alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORMS
10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED APRIL 2, 1997 AND JANUARY 1, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-1997             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-02-1996             JAN-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1997             APR-02-1997
<CASH>                                      67,400,000              46,800,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,965,000              42,900,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 6,165,000                       0
<INVENTORY>                                191,700,000             213,300,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           379,400,000             389,400,000
<PP&E>                                   1,277,000,000           1,093,600,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           (174,600,000)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,733,500,000           1,731,400,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      311,000,000             293,400,000
<BONDS>                                    853,600,000             861,700,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       91,500,000              95,400,000
<PREFERRED>                                 50,900,000              52,800,000
<COMMON>                                       300,000                 300,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 289,900,000             295,300,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,733,500,000           1,731,400,000
<SALES>                                    314,500,000             345,700,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           314,500,000             345,700,000
<CGS>                                      267,200,000             269,100,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              310,300,000             302,800,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,200,000               (800,000) 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          25,200,000              26,600,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (19,800,000)              17,100,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               (8,000,000)               6,900,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (15,400,000)               6,400,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                 900,000
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (15,400,000)               7,300,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.56)                    0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.56)                    0.20
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 33223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15093]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Determination Concerning a Petition To Add a Class of Employees 
to the Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and 
Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice of a determination concerning a petition to 
add a class of employees from the Grand Junction Facilities, in Grand 
Junction, Colorado, to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the 
Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 
(EEOICPA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director, 
Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-46, 
Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938, Telephone 1-877-222-7570. Information 
requests can also be submitted by email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e7a3a4a6b4a7a4a3a4c9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0246414351424146412c454d54">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 21, 2018, the Secretary of HHS 
determined that the following class of employees does not meet the 
statutory criteria for addition to the SEC as authorized under EEOICPA:

    ``All employees who worked in any area of the Grand Junction 
Facilities in Grand Junction, Colorado, from January 1, 1986, 
through July 31, 2010.''

    Authority: 42 U.S.C.7384q.

John J. Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2018-15093 Filed 7-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Calendar No. 72

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1010

[Report No. 103–49]

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Federal

Election Commission for fiscal year 1994.

MAY 24 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Read twice and placed on the calendar
II

Calendar No. 72

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1010

[Report No. 103–49]

To authorize appropriations for the Federal Election Commission for fiscal

year 1994.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 24 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. FORD, from the Committee on Rules and Administration, reported the

following original bill; which was read twice and placed on the calendar

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Federal Election

Commission for fiscal year 1994.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the second sentence of section 314 of the Federal

4 Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 439c) is amend5 ed by striking out ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘1978,’’ and by inserting

6 after ‘‘1981’’ the following: ‘‘, and $23,654,000 for the

7 fiscal year ending September 30, 1994’’.
<Page>



                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

              STATEMENT DETAILING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

     For the year ended July 31, 2006 per audited Financial Statements:

                - net income (loss)                             $(3,926,921)

         Weighted Average Number of Shares
         Outstanding Calculated as follows:            12,818,189
                                                       ==========

            Number of Shares          Weight          Weighted Average
                                                      Number of Shares

              12,818,189               1.00               12,818,189
                                                          ----------
                                                          12,818,189

         Income (Loss) Per Share                                    $($0.31)


     For the year ended July 31, 2005 per audited Financial Statements:

                - net income (loss)                             ($7,363,054)

         Weighted Average Number of Shares
         Outstanding Calculated as follows:            12,860,438
                                                       ==========
            Number of Shares          Weight         Weighted Average
                                                     Number of Shares

              12,997,551               0.04                  519,902
              12,976,451               0.04                  519,058
              12,938,051               0.04                  517,522
              12,909,751               0.04                  516,390
              12,862,651               0.04                  514,506
              12,818,189               0.80               10,273,060
                                                          ----------
                                                          12,860,438

         Income (Loss) Per Share                                     ($0.57)
#### Abraham Weinstein, Plaintiff, *v.*David Helfenberg, Defendant.

(County Court, Kings County,

November, 1912.)

County Court — jurisdiction — actions — counterclaim affecting.

Where the complaint in a County Court action to recover a sum of money only demands judgment for a sum not exceeding $2,000, the court has jurisdiction to try the action and render judgment upon defendant’s counterclaim irrespective of its amount

Demurrer to counterclaim.

Frank Weinstein, for plaintiff.

Israel H. Perkins, for defendant.

Dike, J.

A demurrer is interposed here to the counterclaim contained in the amended answer of the defendant. The first ground of demurrer is that the court has not jurisdiction of the subject thereof.

The amended answer sets forth by way of counterclaim that the defendant has performed all acts properly to be performed by him under the alleged contract in question, but that owing to certain acts of the plaintiff the defendant has been damaged in the sum of $8,000 and asks that the complaint be dismissed and for judgment in his favor for that amount.

The jurisdiction of the county court in actions for the recovery of a sum of money only is limited by section 14 of article VI of the Constitution and section 340 of the Code of Civil Procedure to actions in which the complaint demands judgment for a sum not exceeding $2,000. There seems to have been certain doubt as to whether the court would have jurisdiction to pass upon a counterclaim, as in the case at bar, exceeding on its face the $2,000 limitation fixed by the Constitution and the Code. Having obtained jurisdiction under the complaint, and all the parties being *191before the court, it would seem, to my mind, a grievous burden that a defendant could not avail himself of a counterclaim'under such conditions, and that the entire controversy should not be settled and adjusted at that time. The limitation is upon the amount in the complaint; there is no limitation as to what may be counterclaimed in the answer. That such a practice should obtain, seems tó me eminently proper. It is along the lines of economy to litigants as well as a means of speedy adjustment of differences at one time. Nor am I able to see, in view of the decision in the case of Howard Iron Works v. Buffalo Elevating Co., 176 N. Y. 1, how there can be any further doubt.

The demurrer is, therefore, overruled, with costs.

Demurrer overruled, with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 585 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 585

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                   November 29, 1994.  
    Resolved, That the Speaker is hereby authorized and directed to administer 
the oath of office to the gentleman from Oklahoma, Mr. Steve Largent.
    Resolved, That the question of the final right of Mr. Steve Largent to a 
seat in the One Hundred Third Congress be referred to the Committee on House 
Administration.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2023286EN.01002401.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/24

---

Order of the President of the Court of 10 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bihor — Romania) — F.O.L. v Tribunalul Cluj with the participation of Consiliul Naţional pentru Combaterea Discriminării

(Case C-643/21, (1) Tribunalul Cluj)

(2023/C 286/29)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 25.2.2022.

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ViroPharma Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michel de Rosen                                                      
|Michel de Rosen                                                          
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors
|August 3, 2005                                                           
|                                                                         
|/s/ Vincent J. Milano                                                    
|Vincent J. Milano                                                        
|Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer                    
|August 3, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,048
<SECURITIES>                                        91
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                       218
<INVENTORY>                                      1,726
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,535
<PP&E>                                           6,016
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,532
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           599
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,366
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,506
<SALES>                                         14,347
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,347
<CGS>                                            4,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,723
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,378
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,345
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,345
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $3.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $3.14
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

	   <ARTICLE> 5
	   <MULTIPLIER> 1,000
	          
	   <S>                                 <C>
	   <PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
	   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   SEP-30-19
	   <PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-19
	   <CASH>                                18,443
	   <SECURITIES>                               0
	   <RECEIVABLES>                         43,033
	   <ALLOWANCES>                           2,181
	   <INVENTORY>                           44,958
	   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                       9,666
	   <PP&E>                               126,959
	   <DEPRECIATION>                        80,237
	   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                       198,388
	   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 52,813
	   <BONDS>                               23,435
	   <COMMON>                               2,112
	   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
	   <PREFERRED>                                0
	   <OTHER-SE>                           114,973
	   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         198,388
	   <SALES>                              178,092
	   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                     221,193
	   <CGS>                                104,506
	   <TOTAL-COSTS>                        129,335
	   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                     115,983
	   <LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
	   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     2,355
	   <INCOME-PRETAX>                      (26,480)
	   <INCOME-TAX>                           1,150
	   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (27,630)
	   <DISCONTINUED>                             0
	   <EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
	   <CHANGES>                                  0
	   <NET-INCOME>                         (27,630)
	   <EPS-PRIMARY>                          (1.40)
	   <EPS-DILUTED>                          (1.40)
	           
	   
</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

LR/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE RIVERA CID,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-71927

Agency No. A095-576-083

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 15, 2009** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Jose Rivera Cid, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

FILED

JAN 08 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
LR/Research 2 07-71927

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Singh v. Gonzales, 

491 F.3d 1090, 1095 (9th Cir. 2007), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the 

petition for review. 

The BIA acted within its discretion in denying as untimely Rivera Cid’s 

motion to reopen because it was filed more than 90 days after the BIA’s final

removal order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (motion to reopen must be filed 

within 90 days of final administrative removal order), and Rivera Cid did 

not show that he acted with the due diligence required for equitable tolling, see 

Singh, 491 F.3d at 1096-97. 

To the extent Rivera Cid contends that the BIA violated his due process 

rights by disregarding his hardship evidence, the contention is not supported by 

the record and does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim. See MartinezRosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Nick E. STAMATHIS, Respondent.

No. 44790.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 20, 1974.

Norman A. Faulkner, Tallahassee, and Bruce Marger, St. Petersburg, for complainant.

J. E. Satterfield, Clearwater, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on the Petition of The Florida Bar for approval of a conditional guilty plea and entry of final order of discipline.

A formal complaint was filed against respondent by The Florida Bar on August 21, 1973. Subsequently, pursuant to the provisions of Integration Rule 11.-13(6) (b), 32 F.S.A., respondent tendered a conditional guilty plea subject to approval by the Supreme Court in exchange for the imposition of an 89 day suspension, taxation of costs and probation for a three year period which probation would consist of quarterly reports filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court with a copy to Staff Counsel for The Florida Bar.

The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar accepted the conditional guilty plea in November, 1973, subject to the approval by this Court.

We hereby approve the conditional guilty plea and respondent is hereby suspended to and including May 20, 1974, and he is directed to file quarterly reports with the Clerk and' a copy to Staff Counsel for The Florida Bar, and execution is hereby directed to issue for the costs against respondent in the amount of $348.20. The respondent may continue to work on pending cases which are listed on an inventory of pending cases to be filed by the respondent with the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Florida, Bar Counsel and Staff Counsel within 20 days after the date of this order.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the first quarter ended September 2, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark W. McCutcheon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   October 11, 2005



/s/ Mark W. McCutcheon
----------------------
Mark W. McCutcheon
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                       23
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, that:





(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 20013 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 20, 2014/s/Larry VanceLarry VanceChief Executive Officer





This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.