alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of Natural Resources Revenue

          - [Docket No. ONRR-2016-0001; DS63644000 DR2000000.CH7000 189D0102R2]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Office of Natural Resources Revenue, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR) is withdrawing the temporary physical address change published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on April 27, 2016 for courier services and personal deliveries.                    

# DATES:

The cancellation takes effect on July 16, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Darrel Redford, Supervisory Accountant, at (303) 231-3085, or email to                         *Darrel.Redford@onrr.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

As of July 16, 2018, all courier services and deliveries should be made to ONRR, at the Denver Federal Center, Building 85, Entrance N-1, West 6th Ave. and Kipling St., Denver, Colorado 80225. Visitor parking is available in the north parking lot near Entrance N-1, which is the only entrance on the north side of Building 85. To request service, please use the courtesy phone and call Janet Giron at (303) 231-3088.

Authority:44 U.S.C. 1505.

Gregory J. Gould,

Director for Office of Natural Resources Revenue.

[FR Doc. 2018-15112 Filed 7-13-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4335-30-P
# C_2021391EN.01001602.xml

| 27.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 391/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 391/16

---

Appeal brought on 13 August 2021 by Health Information Management (HIM) against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 9 June 2021 in Case T-235/19, Health Information Management (HIM) v Commission

(Case C-500/21 P)

(2021/C 391/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Health Information Management (HIM) (represented by: P. Zeegers, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the present appeal admissible and well founded and, consequently; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present appeal admissible and well founded and, consequently;

| — | set aside paragraphs 93 to 97 and 117 to 185 of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 9 June 2021 delivered in Case T-235/19, Health Information Management v Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside paragraphs 93 to 97 and 117 to 185 of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 9 June 2021 delivered in Case T-235/19, Health Information Management v Commission;

| — | set aside points 1, 2, 3 and 5 of the operative part of the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside points 1, 2, 3 and 5 of the operative part of the judgment under appeal;

| — | refer the case back to the General Court in order to enable that court to rule on the claim brought by the appellant in its application lodged on 4 April 2019; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the General Court in order to enable that court to rule on the claim brought by the appellant in its application lodged on 4 April 2019;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the entirety of the costs and expenses, including the costs and fees of the appellant’s adviser, the amount of which is provisionally fixed at EUR 15 000 excluding VAT. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the entirety of the costs and expenses, including the costs and fees of the appellant’s adviser, the amount of which is provisionally fixed at EUR 15 000 excluding VAT.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

In support of the appeal, Health Information Management relies on three grounds: (i) infringement of the rights of the defence and of the right to good administration enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; (ii) failure to fulfil the obligation to state reasons under the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU; and (iii) infringement and misapplication of Article 272 TFEU and, consequently, infringement of the principles of impartiality and proportionality.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
condensed  consolidated balance sheet of Dictaphone Corporation at June 30, 1998
and the condensed  consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended
June 30, 1998 and is qualified  in its  entirety by reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                            1,000  
                                                               
<S>                                              <C>           
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           6-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1998  
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-1998  
<CASH>                                                  5,896  
<SECURITIES>                                                0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                          74,231  
<ALLOWANCES>                                            2,421  
<INVENTORY>                                            51,178  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      141,195  
<PP&E>                                                 62,621  
<DEPRECIATION>                                         33,820  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        441,542  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  81,702  
<BONDS>                                               342,933  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  22,325  
<PREFERRED>                                                 0  
<COMMON>                                                  130  
<OTHER-SE>                                           (19,123)  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          441,542  
<SALES>                                               101,219  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      168,810  
<CGS>                                                  91,969  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         170,968  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     19,719  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (21,222)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                            (334)  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (21,556)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0  
<CHANGES>                                                   0  
<NET-INCOME>                                         (21,556)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               0  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0  
                                                               
                                                               

</TABLE>
# C_2023063EN.01003901.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 January 2023 — Hecht Pharma v EUIPO — Gufic BioSciences (Gufic)

(Case T-346/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark Gufic - Genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Public and outward use - Extent of use - Nature and form of use - Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered)

(2023/C 63/48)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Hecht Pharma GmbH (Bremervörde, Germany) (represented by: C. Sachs and J. Sachs, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Schäfer, D. Hanf and A. Ringelhann, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Gufic BioSciences Ltd (Mumbai, India) (represented by: A. Wehlau and T. Uhlenhut, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks partial annulment and alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 June 2021 (Case R 2738/2019-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hecht Pharma GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hecht Pharma GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);

| 3. | Orders Gufic BioSciences Ltd to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Gufic BioSciences Ltd to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-9040-3]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564-7156 or                     *https://www2.epa.gov/​nepa/​*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements

Filed 07/02/2018 Through 07/06/2018

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-public/​action/​eis/​search.*

EIS No. 20180153, Draft, USFS, CA, Omya Sentinel & Butterfield Quarries Expansion, Comment Period Ends: 08/28/2018, Contact: Scott Eliason 909-382-2830

EIS No. 20180154, Final, USFWS, TX, Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Barton Springs/Edwards Aquifer Conservation District Habitat Conservation Plan, Review Period Ends: 08/13/2018, Contact: Marty Tuegel 505-248-6651

EIS No. 20180155, Draft, USACE, CO, Adams and Denver Counties Colorado General Investigation Study, Comment Period Ends: 08/28/2018, Contact: Jeffrey Bohlken 402-995-2671

Dated: July 10, 2018.

Robert Tomiak,

Director, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2018-15017 Filed 7-12-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PROSOURCE, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996             DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996             DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                       3,179,000               2,325,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              200,584,000             230,089,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,177,000               2,585,000
<INVENTORY>                                131,816,000             140,432,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           357,089,000             387,880,000
<PP&E>                                      69,807,000              73,016,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              25,676,000              20,509,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             465,924,000             489,173,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      247,188,000             271,964,000
<BONDS>                                    169,981,000             163,220,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        53,000                  52,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,999,000              49,369,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               465,924,000             489,173,000
<SALES>                                  3,068,010,000           3,461,837,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         3,068,010,000           3,461,837,000
<CGS>                                    2,832,161,000           3,193,270,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,832,161,000           3,193,270,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           251,377,000             255,927,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,352,000               1,845,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,941,000              14,678,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (26,205,000)               (699,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 9,605,000                (85,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (16,600,000)               (784,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0               (772,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (16,600,000)             (1,556,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.13)                  (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### RICHARD F. ALLEN & Co. *vs.*ELIZABETH BABCOCK.

A lunatic may defend by next friend without having a commission.

Lunacy may be set up against a note at least as between the original parties or against the first indorser.

Rule to show cause why a judgment should not be set aside and the deft, let into a trial.

The rule in this case was founded on an affidavit of Joseph K. Eyre, the brother ánd next friend of the deft., setting forth: That the above-mentioned judgment was obtained at the present term of this court, by default, in a suit of foreign attachment; that the cause of action in said suit was two supposed promissory notes, for one thousand dollars each, drawn by Benjamin Ashburner to the order of Elizabeth Babcock, at four months, and purporting to be endorsed by her; that at the time of the supposed indorsement, and for a long time before, the said Elizabeth Babcock was, and yet is, afflicted with mental derangement, and so far deprived of her reason as to be incapable of doing any business; that she is now confined in the Frank-ford hospital; and that the said supposed indorsements were made without any good or valuable consideration as far as regards the said Elizabeth Babcock.

*Bayard*

objected that the deft, ór any one for her had no right to controvert this judgment without taking out a commission of lunacy.

*The court*

said there were two questions: whether a party could be permitted to stultify himself, and secondly, whether a lunatic can institute proceedings by next friend. There is some doubt whether a man can stultify himself by *plea,*but no doubt he can do so on evidence under the general issue. It might be impolitic to permit the defence of lunacy to an indorsed note after it is put in circulation; but this note is in the hands of the first indorser, and it was his duty to inquire not only into the solvency of the indorser, but into the legality of the indorsement. This is a case also of foreign attachment, where the judgment is without appearance, or, so far as appears, without notice, it is a case therefore of a judgment without trial, and the motion commends itself to the favorable consideration of the court. As to the other question, a late author, the only one we have had an opportunity of examining, lays it down that a lunatic can sue *349or defend by next friend. *Shelford on Lunacy,*395. *2 Law Library, 250.*

*Booth,*for defendant.

*J. A. Bayard,*for plaintiff.

Rule absolute, *(a)***Judgment to remain as security.

(a)

**On a trial at the following term, when the jury returned into the box, the plff.’s were called and refused to answer. The court doubted whether, standing as this case did on the record, the plff could choose to be non pros’d.; they therefore took the verdict for the deft, and laid a rule to show cause why this verdict should not be set aside and judgment of non pros, entered. This rule was made absolute without argument.

Judgment of non pros.
No. 00-1055.

#### Sphere Drake Underwriting Management, Ltd. *v.*Royal Insurance Company of America.

Ct. App. Tex., 9th Dist. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1089 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1089

       To extend the existing suspension of duty on 6-Hydroxy-2-
   naphthalenesulfonic acid, and its sodium, potassium, and ammonium 
                                 salts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 1993

Mr. Danforth (for himself and Mr. Kohl) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the existing suspension of duty on 6-Hydroxy-2-
   naphthalenesulfonic acid, and its sodium, potassium, and ammonium 
                                 salts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 6-HYDROXY-2-
              NAPHTHALENE-SULFONIC ACID, AND ITS SODIUM, POTASSIUM, AND 
              AMMONIUM SALTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.10 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/92'' and 
inserting ``12/31/95''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
        applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
        warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Retroactive application to certain entries.--
        Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
        U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper request 
        filed with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th day 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or 
        withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any goods 
        described in subheading 9902.29.10 of the Harmonized Tariff 
        Schedule of the United States that was made--
                    (A) after December 31, 1992; and
                    (B) before the 15th day after the date of the 
                enactment of this Act;
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though the amendment 
        made by subsection (a) applied to such entry or withdrawal.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1177 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1177

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
   Veterans' Advisory Committee on Education, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 29 (legislative day, June 22), 1993

Mr. Rockefeller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
   Veterans' Advisory Committee on Education, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

    Section 3692(c) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking out ``December 31, 1993'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
``December 31, 1997''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO MAINTAIN REGIONAL OFFICE IN THE 
              PHILIPPINES.

    Section 315(b) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking out ``March 31, 1994'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
``September 30, 1995''.

                                 <all>
```