alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 136 (Monday, July 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 32852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15126]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP17-495-000; CP17-494-000]


Jordan Cove Energy Project, L.P.; Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline, 
L.P.; Notice of Meeting

    The environmental staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(Commission) along with representatives of the U.S. Forest Service, 
Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will 
meet with representatives of the Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower 
Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians to discuss the proposed Jordan Cove LNG and 
Pacific Connector Pipeline Projects. The meeting will be held at the 
location and time listed below:

North Bend Public Library--Big Meeting Room, 1800 Sherman Avenue, North 
Bend, OR 97459, Phone: (541) 756-0400, Tuesday, July 17, 2018, 1:00 
p.m. PDT

    Members of the public and intervenors in the referenced proceeding 
may attend and observe this meeting; however, participation will be 
limited to tribal representatives and agency personnel. If tribal 
representatives decide to disclose information about a specific 
location which could create a risk or harm to an archeological site or 
Native American cultural resource, the public will be excused for that 
portion of the meeting. A summary of the meeting will be entered into 
the Commission's administrative record.
    If you plan to attend this meeting, please contact Mr. John 
Peconom, Environmental Project Manager at (202) 502-6352 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d69cb9beb8f886b3b5b9b8b9bb96b0b3a4b5f8b1b9a0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f75505751116f5a5c505150527f595a4d5c11585049">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: July 10, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-15126 Filed 7-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DWQ Topics

 

NJDEP Dental Amalgam Program

 

Dental Amalgam NJDEP Online Registraton and Certification 

Going forward, dental facilities will be required to certify between 10/1 and 12/31 of each year, with the 

certification covering the period 10/1 to 9/30 of the reporting year. 

 

The NJDEP dental amalgam program is applicable ONLY to those 

dental facilities that generate amalgam waste through placement 

and/or removal of amalgam. 

Discharges to Septic Systems 

The Bureau of Nonpoint Pollution Control (BNPC) has issued a New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination 

System Discharge to Ground Water (NJPDES-DGW) general permit for Dental Facilities Onsite Wastewater 

Treatment Systems. For more information, please contact the Bureau of Nonpoint Pollution Control or read 

more regarding the K2 General Permit. 

Discharges to Public Sanitary Sewer 

Discharges into public sanitary sewers are regulated by the Bureau of Pretreatment and Residuals. All dental 

facilities subject to this regulation were required to implement Best Management Practices, or BMPs, by 

October 1, 2008, and must install an amalgam separator that meets the ISO 11143 criteria by October 1, 2009. 

Facilities that opened after October 1, 2007 shall immediately install an amalgam separator. Each dental 

facility subject to this regulation shall register and certify compliance annually with the NJDEP. 

 

The renewal period is from

October 1 through December 31 of each year. 

Revised guidance manuals (updated September 28, 2010) are available.

Prior manuals may no longer be applicable. 

RESOURCES: 

On-line Registration User Manuals File 

Type 

Dental Facility Registration Manual for New

Registrants

DWQ - Dental Amalgam Program Page 1 of 2

http://www.state.nj.us/dep/dwq/Dental_Amalgam_Overview.htm 5/6/2011
AFTER PRINTING THE APPROPRIATE MANUAL CLICK HERE TO BEGIN REGISTRATION 

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: 

 

If you have questions or need additional information regarding discharges to the 

public sanitary sewer, contact the Bureau of Pretreatment and Residuals at 609-

633-3823. 

 

 

Dental Facility Guidance Manual for Renewal

Registration

Rules

Best Management Practices

Fact Sheet

Amalgam Separators

department: water quality home | njdep home | about dep | index by topic | programs/units | dep online

statewide: njhome | my new jersey | people | business | government | departments | search

State of New Jersey, 1996-2005 

Department of Environmental Protection 

P. O. Box 402 

Trenton, NJ 08625-0402 

Last Updated: November 22, 2010 

DWQ - Dental Amalgam Program Page 2 of 2

http://www.state.nj.us/dep/dwq/Dental_Amalgam_Overview.htm 5/6/2011
this is don's test opinion.
Exhibit 31.2



I, Vincent J. Milano, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the registrant, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ViroPharma
Incorporated.



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Vincent J. Milano                                
|Vincent J. Milano                                    
|Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



August 3, 2005
# C_2022051EN.01001802.xml

| 31.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social n.o 1 de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 20 September 2021 — JD v BA, DA, DV and CG

(Case C-584/21)

(2022/C 51/24)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social n.o 1 de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: JD

Defendants: BA, DA, DV and CG

Question referred

Does Article 1(1)(a) of Council Directive (EC) 2001/23 of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses, (1) and consequently the contents of the directive, apply to a situation in which the notary in post in a notary’s office — who is both a public official and also the private-sector employer of the office’s employees, with the employment relationship being governed by general employment legislation and by a sectoral Collective Agreement — succeeds the outgoing post-holder, takes on the previous notary’s Protocol, continues to provide services at the same place of work using the same material facilities, and takes on the staff who had worked for the previous notary who had held that post?

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 82, p. 16.

---
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3363

___________ Jack E. McCoy, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * American Federation of Labor and * [Unpublished] Congress of Industrial Organizations, * and AFL-CIO Retirement Plan, * Employer Identification Number * 52-6044583, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 21, 1997 Filed: July 23, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circui t Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jack E. McCoy asserted a number of causes of action against the defendan t union in his complaint, but appeals only from the trial court's order entering judgment against him on his claim that the union di scriminated against him on account of his age in refusing to transfer him to another job, in violation of 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 and-2-

IowaCode Ann. §§ 216.1-216.20. The trial court, after a full bench trial, found that Mr. McCoy had not made out a prima facie case because he had not proved t hat he was qual ified for the position to which he requested a transfer. See Clements v. Genera l Accident Ins. Co. , 821 F.2d 489, 491 (8th Cir. 1987). After a review of the record, we cannot say that the trial court clearly erred in reaching this factual conclusion.
Mr. McCoy contends that we ought to review this record de novo , rather than for clear error, because the trial judge who rendered judgment did not preside during the first part of the trial and did not, therefore, have an opportunity to judge th e demeanor of the witnesses. We reject this contention. First of all, Mr. McCoy does no t direct our attention to any decided case that supports his novel argument, and we know of none. Second, Mr. M cCoy consented to the procedure that was employed in this case. Most importantly, perhaps, the rule th at Mr. McCoy urges us to adopt might well undermine the utility of agreements between parties to a lawsuit allowing a trial cou rt to decide a case on the basis of a written record, including depositions an d affidavits, a result to which we would not like to contribute. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1995
<CASH>                                          47,671
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,800
<INVENTORY>                                     50,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               171,084
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          299,219
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,733
<OTHER-SE>                                   (169,868)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,084
<SALES>                                        589,504
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               589,504
<CGS>                                          429,059
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  285,494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               374,158
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (499,207)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (499,207)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (499,207)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        




</TABLE>
#### SUCCESSION of Freddie Robertson KILLINGSWORTH and Mrs. Rome Schlater Johnston Tuttle et al. v. Edward Hill SCHLATER et al.

No. 53156.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 1, 1973.

In re: Mrs. Rome Schlater Johnston Tuttle, et al applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit Parish of Iberville, 270 So.2d 196.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1083

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that veterans’

allowances and benefits administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs

are not included in gross income.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 8 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1993

Mr. ROCKEFELLER (for himself, Mr. DECONCINI, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. AKAKA,

Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. CAMPBELL, and Mr. JEFFORDS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on

Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that veterans’ allowances and benefits administered by

the Secretary of Veterans Affairs are not included in

gross income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Tax Fairness

5 Act of 1993’’.
2

•S 1083 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF VETERANS’

2 BENEFITS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 134(b)

4 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to quali5 fied military benefit) is amended by adding at the end

6 thereof the following flush sentence:

7 ‘‘For purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘qualified

8 military benefit’ includes any veterans’ allowance or

9 benefit administered by the Secretary of Veterans

10 Affairs.’’.

11 (b) LIMITATION ON MODIFICATIONS.—Paragraph (3)

12 of such section is amended—

13 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking out ‘‘sub14 paragraph (B)’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘sub15 paragraphs (B) and (C)’’; and

16 (2) by adding at the end the following:

17 ‘‘(C) EXCEPTION FOR VETERANS BENE18 FITS.—Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to any

19 veterans’ allowance or benefit administered by

20 the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.’’.

21 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

22 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

23 December 31, 1984.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 135 (Friday, July 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 32689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14958]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Maritime Regulatory Reform

AGENCY: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of 
Management and Budget.

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within 
the Office of Management and Budget is extending the comment period for 
its Maritime Deregulatory request for information (RFI), by 45 days 
until August 30, 2018. Please note, OIRA intends to make all 
submissions publicly available on www.regulations.gov.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by August 30, 2018. Late 
comments will be considered to the extent possible.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments, 
identified by ``Maritime Regulatory Reform RFI,'' by any of the 
following methods: Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. 
Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#66292b24482203140301130a071209141f34202f26292b244803091648010910"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5faf8f79bf1d0c7d0d2c0d9d4c1dac7cce7f3fcf5faf8f79bd0dac59bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>. Include ``Maritime Regulatory 
Reform RFI'' in the subject line of the message.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This extension of comment period pertains to 
the RFI published in 83 FR 22993 pertaining to maritime regulatory 
reform, docket number 2018-10539. For more information, please see 
https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=OMB-2018-0002.

Neomi Rao,
Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2018-14958 Filed 7-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3110-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Preferred Voice, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Mary G. Merritt, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|                           
|/s/ Mary G. Merritt        
|Mary G. Merritt            
|Principal Executive Officer
|Principal Financial Officer
|February 13, 2004
#### Leroy COLBROTH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41008.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 27, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 21, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ, concur.
PAGE1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT



 The Partners
 T. Rowe Price Realty Income Fund I,
 A No-Load Limited Partnership:
 
 We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of T. Rowe
 Price Realty Income Fund I, A No-Load Limited Partnership as of
 September 30, 1995 and 1994, and the related statements of
 operations, partners' capital and cash flows for each of the
 years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1995.  In
 connection  with our audits of the aforementioned financial
 statements, we also have audited the information included in
 the related financial statement schedules as of and for each of
 the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1995. 
 These financial statements and financial statement schedules
 are the responsibility of the Partnership's management.  Our
 responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
 statements and financial statement schedules based on our
 audits.
 
 We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted
 auditing standards.  Those standards require that we plan and
 perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
 the financial statements and financial statement schedules are
 free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on
 a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
 in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing
 the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
 by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
 statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a
 reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
 In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
 position of T. Rowe Price Realty Income Fund I, A No-Load
 Limited Partnership as of September 30, 1995 and 1994, and the
 results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the
 years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1995, in
 conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. 
 Also, in our opinion, the information included in the related
 financial statement schedules as of and for each of the years
 in the three-year period ended September 30, 1995 when
 considered in relation to the basic financial statements 
 


 <PAGE>2
 
 taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the
 information set forth therein.
 
 
                                                                 

   
                                                                 

   
                                                                 

 KPMG Peat Marwick LLP  
                                                                 

 Chicago, Illinois
 October 20, 1995