alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Sands Regent (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                           |  |                                                      
|-------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                           | 
|Dated:    October 25, 2006 |  | /s/    Ferenc B. Szony                               
|                           |  | Ferenc B. Szony President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certifications is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Sands Regent (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the annual period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                           |  |                                                                    
|-------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:    October 25, 2006 |  | /s/    Cornelius T. Klerk                                          
|                           |  | Cornelius T. Klerk Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 255

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any laws enacted

pertaining to the reform of our Nation’s health care system should

apply to Members of Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 23, 1993

Mr. BLUTE submitted the following resolution which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

any laws enacted pertaining to the reform of our Nation’s health care system should apply to Members of

Congress.

Whereas the President of the United States has made the reform of our Nation’s health care system a priority;

Whereas the President’s own health care reform plan is intended to apply to every citizen of the United States;

Whereas Members of Congress will play a significant role in

determining the type of health care system that will serve

every citizen; and

Whereas the citizens of this country have a right to expect

that any health care system to which they belong shall
2

•HRES 255 IH

be at least as good as that available to Members of Congress: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that any law enacted pertaining to the reform

3 of our Nation’s health care system should apply to Mem4 bers of Congress.

Æ
**MEMORANDUM**

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495 and EPA-HQ-OAR-20 13-0603

RE: Telephone Conversation with Mr. Mike Monea ( SaskPower), February 2, 2016

On February 2, 2016, Dr. Nick Hutson (US EPA/OAR) a nd Mr. Steven Silverman (US EPA/OGC) spoke by
teleconference for about 20 minutes with Mr. Mike M onea, President, Carbon Capture & Storage Initiatives with SaskPower (Saskatchewan, Canada). Mr. Monea leads the CCS project at SaskPower Boundary Dam Unit 3 (BD3), which has installed full scale CCS. The purpose of the call was to discuss BD3’s recent performance with respect to CO 2 capture, and the overall operation of the CCS syst em.

During the call, Mr. Monea made the following point s:
 The reported operating issues the plant has faced a re not unexpected in the initial startup period of operation of a complex emission control s ystem.

 Most of the issues that have affected system operat ion have been related to ancillary systems rather directly to the carbon capture system itself . The chemistry of the capture system has worked as designed throughout the operating period. Among the ancillary issues were valve and duct design (they were initially installed too close together in some plant areas), and the amine storage vessel which was delivered with visib le hairline cracks in the vessel floor and “weeped” – i.e., showed visible accumulated moistur e – and had to be replaced;

 In initial months of operation, super heater steam temperature needed to be recalibrated and leaky steam valves replaced to avoid degradation of amines due to overheating;

 The plant was taken down for maintenance in Septemb er and October to address various operational issues related to sodium-based sub-micr on particles that were fouling demisters at
the exit of the SO 2 scrubber upstream of the carbon capture system;

 The plant captured CO 2 at a rate of approximately 45% over its initial ye ar of operation (415,000 tonnes captured);

 SaskPower did incur some penalties in its first 6 m onths of operation for delivering less CO 2 to the EOR site than the contract called for; Mr. Mone a expects that the operation will run at a net profit to SaskPower over the full year, and thereaf ter; and

 Any issue regarding whether to add CCS to other Bou ndary Dam units relates to questions of manpower, not to questions about efficacy of the CC S technology.

Overall, Mr. Monea is optimistic that operating iss ues have been resolved. He cited the plant’s performance in November, December and January, wher e capture rates have exceeded contractual amounts, and where capture rates increa sed each month. He also noted that the plant met 90% “nameplate” capacity each time it was operated to maximize carbon capture. Mr. Monea also told us that the company has commenc ed a CCS “knowledge center”, coupled with on-line posting of plant operating results in order to disseminate information about Boundary Dam operations in a highly transparent man ner.
# C_2023179EN.01003001.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products (Fluid distribution equipment)

(Case T-505/21) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing fluid distribution equipment - Ground for invalidity - Non-compliance with requirements for protection - Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function - Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)

(2023/C 179/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by: T. Wuttke and J. Lewandowski, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 June 2021 (Case R 1003/2018-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Tinnus Enterprises LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Tinnus Enterprises LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 401, 4.10.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MILTOPE
GROUP INC. FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         301,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,417,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 16,432,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,406,000
<PP&E>                                      16,042,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,313,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,440,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,510,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,845,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,440,000
<SALES>                                     65,708,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,708,000
<CGS>                                       52,336,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               65,331,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,361,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (984,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (984,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (984,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023216EN.01004101.xml

| 19.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 April 2023 — Rochem Group v EUIPO — Rochem Marine (ROCHEM)

(Case T-548/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark ROCHEM - Earlier national figurative mark ROCHEM MARINE - Relative ground for invalidity - Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark - Articles 15 and 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2023/C 216/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Rochem Group AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: K. Guridi Sedlak, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rochem Marine Srl (Genoa, Italy) (represented by: R. Gioia and L. Mansi, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 June 2021 (Case R 1546/2019-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Rochem Group AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Rochem Group AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 422, 18.10.2021.

---
# C_2021490EN.01002302.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/23

---

Action brought on 28 September 2021 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-601/21)

(2021/C 490/24)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Stobiecka-Kuik, G. Wils and P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by adding exemptions, relating to the production of certain documents, printed matter and stamps and markings, which are not provided for in Directive 2014/24/EU on public procurement, (1) the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 1(1) and (3) and Article 15(2) and (3) of Directive 2014/24/EU, read in conjunction with Article 346(1)(a) TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by adding exemptions, relating to the production of certain documents, printed matter and stamps and markings, which are not provided for in Directive 2014/24/EU on public procurement, (1) the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 1(1) and (3) and Article 15(2) and (3) of Directive 2014/24/EU, read in conjunction with Article 346(1)(a) TFEU;

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In transposing Directive 2014/24, Poland exempted the production of a wide range of documents, printed matter and stamps and markings from the scope of the procedures provided for in that directive. The exemptions introduced by Poland concern public documents (such as, for instance, national ID cards, passport documents and sailors’ service record books); excise stamps, legal markings and vehicle inspection stickers; ballot papers and holographic markings placed on voting rights certificates; microprocessors with software used for the management of public documents; and IT systems and databases essential for the use of public documents. According to the Commission, the introduction of those exemptions amounts to infringement of Directive 2014/24, since the scope of that directive has been limited in a manner that is not justified by the provisions of Directive 2014/24 or Article 346 TFEU. The Commission relies on the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-187/16, Commission v Austria, as an important precedent in that regard.

In the context of the pre-litigation procedure, Poland has argued that there is a need to protect the security of official documents. While agreeing that there is a need to guarantee the security and authenticity of those documents, the Commission considers that Poland has not demonstrated that the required protection, including protection against falsification or protection connected with the provisions on the protection of personal data, cannot be realised in the context of the public procurement procedure provided for in Directive 2014/24.

---

(1)  OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. §1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Masakazu Kurushima, in my capacity as the President and Chief Executive Officer of California Steel Industries, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:



the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004, filed by California Steel Industries, Inc., on March 28, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in such annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of California Steel Industries, Inc.



Dated: March 28, 2005



By:

/s/ Masakazu KurushimaMasakazu Kurushima,President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Sean P. Washchuk, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofVitran Corporation Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theAudit Committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

Date: October 26, 2010
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements Form S-8 (No. 333-08847) pertaining to the Lark Sequencing
Technologies, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan and Form S-8 (No. 333-35675)
pertaining to the Lark Technologies, Inc. 1997 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan
for Non-Employee Directors of our report dated  March 1, 1999, with respect
to the financial statements of Lark Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Houston, Texas
March 30, 1999
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

This 31th day of March, 2003.


/s/ David D. Stovall
--------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Annette Banks
--------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
#### Lavonia Dewitt HUTCHINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. II-85.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 26, 1978.

*1161Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael H. Davidson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pleaded guilty to burglary and was sentenced under Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1975) to three years incarceration, three years suspended, to be followed by three years probation with the special condition thereof that appellant spend four months in the county jail with credit for sixty-three (63) days jail time previously served. Within the probationary period, an affidavit for violation of probation was filed. The court found that appellant had violated his probation, and consequently sentenced appellant to five years imprisonment with credit for sixty-three (63) days previously served.

Upon the revocation of probation, the court was authorized to impose any sentence which might have been originally imposed. *State v. Jones,*327 So.2d 18 (Fla.1976). Accordingly, the sentence of five years imprisonment was proper. See Sections 810.02(3), 775.082(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1975). However, the court was required to credit appellant with all time previously served in jail, including that time served as a condition of probation. *State*v. *Jones,*supra;*DeForest v. State,*356 So.2d 52 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1978). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and the cause is remanded for proper sentencing. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

McCORD, C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

D.C. KING, A.Y. MARKS, S.A. DOMINGUEZ

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

ALEXANDRE C. ROBINSON

CORPORAL (E-4), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201500418

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 10 September 2015.

Military Judge: Col J.K. Carberry, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, 1st Battalion, 7th 

Marines, 1st Marine Division, MCAGCC, Twentynine Palms, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LtCol D.C. Young, USMC.

For Appellant: LCDR W. Scott Stoebner, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian K. Keller, Esq.

22 March 2016

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted without 

assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved 

by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military 

Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 For the Court 

 R.H. TROIDL 

 Clerk of Court