alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, SeanP. Washchuk, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vitran Corporation Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: July 26, 2010
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1082

To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise and extend the program

of making grants to the States for the operation of offices of rural

health, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 8 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1993

Mr. COCHRAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise and extend

the program of making grants to the States for the

operation of offices of rural health, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Offices of Rural

5 Health Amendments of 1993’’.
2

•S 1082 IS

1 SEC. 2. REVISION AND EXTENSION OF PROGRAM FOR

2 STATE OFFICES OF RURAL HEALTH.

3 (a) MATCHING FUNDS.—Section 338J(b) of the Pub4 lic Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254r(b)) is amended to

5 read as follows:

6 ‘‘(b) REQUIREMENT OF MATCHING FUNDS.—

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—With respect to the costs to

8 be incurred by a State in carrying out the purpose

9 described in subsection (a), the Secretary may not

10 make a grant under such subsection unless the State

11 agrees to provide non-Federal contributions toward

12 such costs, in cash, in an amount that is not less

13 than $1 for each $1 of Federal funds provided in the

14 grant.

15 ‘‘(2) DETERMINATION OF AMOUNT CONTRIB16 UTED.—In determining the amount of non-Federal

17 contributions in cash that a State has provided pur18 suant to paragraph (1), the Secretary may not in19 clude any amounts provided to the State by the Fed20 eral Government.’’.

21 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section

22 338J(j)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.

23 254r(j)(1)) is amended—

24 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘1992,’’; and
3

•S 1082 IS

1 (2) by inserting before the period the following:

2 ‘‘, and $7,500,000 for each of the fiscal years 1994

3 through 1996’’.

4 (c) TERMINATION OF PROGRAM.—Section 338J(k) of

5 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254r(k)) is

6 amended by striking ‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting

7 ‘‘$32,500,000’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Paul H. Palmer, Chief Financial Officer of Sierra Health Services, Inc. certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Sierra Health Services, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

	a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

	b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 15, 2003	

						By:	/s/ Paul H. Palmer__________

							Name: 	Paul H. Palmer 

							Title: 	Chief Financial Officer
The Directors Global Tech Inc

3509
Auburn Hills, MI 48321 POBox 215107

USA









24 April 2008







Dear Sir/Madam





Global Tech Inc loan









I am writing to confirm that the ioan made to Global Tech Inc on 26 May 2005 by Battlebridge Secretaries Limited for US$100,OOO is interest bearing (at 5% per annum) and is repayable on demand.

There is currently no intention by the directors of Battlebridge Secretaries Limited to demand repayment of the loan for the foreseeable future.





Yours faithfully

Christopher livingston-Campbell Director











Registered Company No: 2978416

Registered Office: Brinkworth House, Brinkworth, placeCityWiltshire, PostalCodeSN15 5DF
No. 10996.

#### McManigal *v.*The Columbus & Hocking Coal & Iron Co.

Decided October 13, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Franklin county.

*Messrs. Addison, Sinks & Babcock,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Outlvwaite, Linn & Thurman*and *Mr. D. N. Postlezvaite,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed, the cause standing for further action in the court of common pleas.

Sitaück, Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
#### S. P. TOLAND, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 8247.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 11, 1937.

P. Robert G. Sjostrom, of Miami, Fla., for petitioner.

Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., and Herman Oliphant, Gen. Counsel, Department of Treasury, and Chester A. Gwinn, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

*572Before FOSTER, SIBLEY, and HUTCHESON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the joint stipulation executed September 4, 1936, for the consolidation of this case with the case entitled David Gross, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent (C.C.A.) 88 F.(2d) 567, and the motion filed by petitioner to enter the same judgment in the above-entitled and numbered cause as was entered by this court in the case entitled David Gross, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, on March 2, 1937, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the judgment of the said United States Board of Tax Appeals in this cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed with direction to correct the tax assessed in accordance with the opinion of' this court rendered on March 2, 1937, in the case of David Gross, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
#### GULFSTREAM YACHT CLUB, INC., Appellant, v. WASHINGTON GENERAL INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 69-1049.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 26, 1970.

Rehearing Denied June 17, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF APRIL 3, 1999 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 3, 1999 FOR
GENRAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,873
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,734
<INVENTORY>                                     38,898
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,896
<PP&E>                                          76,659
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,016
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,333
<OTHER-SE>                                     116,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   220,561
<SALES>                                         36,683
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,110
<CGS>                                           14,382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,815
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 224
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,434
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,888
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,322
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,322
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
        

</TABLE>
#### NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO. v. AUVIL.

No. 38717.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 28, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 222 So.2d 46.
EXHIBIT NO. 31.2

CERTIFICATION

  I, Shawn M. Harrington, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gerber Scientific, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:   December 11, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1129 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1129

 To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to authorize the transfer 
of $20,000,000 in addition to United States War Reserve Stockpiles for 
    Allies in Thailand to support the implementation of a bilateral 
                        agreement with Thailand.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 17 (legislative day, June 15), 1993

  Mr. Pell (by request) introduced the following bill; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to authorize the transfer 
of $20,000,000 in addition to United States War Reserve Stockpiles for 
    Allies in Thailand to support the implementation of a bilateral 
                        agreement with Thailand.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 514(b)(2) 
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321h), as amended by 
section 569 of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related 
Programs Appropriations Act, 1993 (Public Law 102-391, October 6, 1992; 
106 Stat. 1681), is amended by striking out ``of which amount not less 
than $200,000,000 shall be available for stockpiles in Israel, and up 
to $189,000,000 may be made available for stockpiles in the Republic of 
Korea'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``of which amount not less than 
$200,000,000 shall be available for stockpiles in Israel, and up to 
$169,000,000 and $20,000,000 may be available for stockpiles in the 
Republic of Korea and Thailand, respectively''.

                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambassadors International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Brian R. Schaefgen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ Brian R. SchaefgenBrian R. SchaefgenChief Financial OfficerNovember 5, 2004
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: 

 Project No.: 0172.08.005.607 Page 1 of 1 

 Project Name: 2011 Prelim Cat Rev CBI? 

 Yes 

 No 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 

 Incoming 

 Outgoing 

Date: 09/13/11 Time: 2:10 am 

 pm 

Company Name: Arcelormittal Weirton ERG Staff Name: Kimberly Landick 

Contact Name: Dave Minda Contact Phone Number: (304) 797-2288 

General Subject: 2009 DMR Chromium Discharges 

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN 

On September 13, 2011 at 2:10pm I called Dave Minda and asked about the 2009 DMR chromium discharges. 

He confirmed the following discharges: 

Outfall 203 Jan 2009 135,000 ug/L or 135 mg/L 

 Dec 2009 83 ug/L 

 Jan 2010 68200 ug/L 

 Feb 2010 93 ug/L 

Outfall 003 Jan 2009 0.08 mg/L 

He also stated the following NPDES permit limits: 

Outfall 203 Chromium Monitor Only 

Outfall 003 Chromium Daily Max: 2.05 mg/L, Monthly Avg: 0.81 mg/L 

 Fluoride Monitor Only 

Mr. Minda stated that outfall 203 is an internal outfall to outfall 003. There are some treatment steps at outfall 

203 but if more treatment is necessary, it is done at outfall 003. Mr. Minda stated that he is confident in the lab 

results but would contact them if needed. He said that ferric chloride is used to reduce chromium concentrations 

in their wastewater. I thanked Mr. Minda for his time and told him I’d call back with any questions.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 575 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 247
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 575

                          [Report No. 103-846]

  Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill 
  (H.R. 1348) to establish the Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley 
 National Heritage Corridor in the State of Connecticut, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

              October 7 (legislative day, October 6), 1994

   Mr. Moakley, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill 
  (H.R. 1348) to establish the Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley 
 National Heritage Corridor in the State of Connecticut, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order, any rule of the House to the contrary notwithstanding, to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 1348) to establish the 
Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor in the 
State of Connecticut, and for other purposes, with a Senate amendment 
thereto, and to consider a motion that the House concur therein. The 
Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion 
shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural 
Resources. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
motion to final adoption without intervening motion.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 247

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 575

                          [Report No. 103-846]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill 
  (H.R. 1348) to establish the Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley 
 National Heritage Corridor in the State of Connecticut, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

              October 7 (legislative day, October 6), 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```