alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 131 (Monday, July 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14638]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, August 30, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Billups at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(214) 413-6523.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Thursday, August 30, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time via 
teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. For more information please 
contact Lisa Billups at 1-888-912-1227 or (214) 413-6523, or write TAP 
Office, 1114 Commerce Street, Dallas, TX 75242-1021, or post comments 
to the website: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various committee issues for submission to 
the IRS and other TAP related topics. Public input is welcomed.

    Dated: July 2, 2018.
Terrie English,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2018-14638 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2000, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             106
<SECURITIES>                                     2,002
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,394
<ALLOWANCES>                                       858
<INVENTORY>                                     16,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,495
<PP&E>                                          65,374
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,642
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,864
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,659
<SALES>                                        125,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,809
<CGS>                                           86,170
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,459
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,188
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    992
<INCOME-TAX>                                       125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                867
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       867
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06





</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CT Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven B. Solomon,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ STEVEN B. SOLOMON
---------------------
Steven B. Solomon
Chief Executive Officer

April 14, 2004


<PAGE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CT Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Connelly,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ RICHARD CONNELLY
--------------------
Richard Connelly
Chief Financial Officer

April 14, 2004


<PAGE>
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: August 6, 2015 519631

________________________________ In the Matter of ALBERT HARRIOTT, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT MICHAEL SHEAHAN, as Superintendent of Five Points Correctional Facility, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: June 8, 2015 Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ.

__________ Albert Harriott, Elmira, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Determination confirmed. No opinion. Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ., concur.-2- 519631

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
#### Julian Nathan TYSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. P-156.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 11, 1971.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Vera Winter Lee, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the third quarter ended February 29, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Patty Townsend, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   April 10, 2008



/s/ Patty Townsend
------------------
Patty Townsend
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon
request.

                                       22
H. Res. 506

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

August 4, 1994.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 3474) to reduce administrative requirements

for insured depository institutions to the extent consistent

with safe and sound banking practices, to facilitate the establishment of community development financial institutions,

and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The

conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Anna ADAMS, Appellant, v. Maria A. PETRAS, Appellee.

No. 641.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Aug. 30, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 27, 1967.

J. Luther Drew, of Ives & Davis, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Larry Klein, of Miller, Cone, Owen, Wagner & Nugent, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment entered in favor of the defendant pursuant to a jury verdict in an automobile accident occurring at an intersection in Lake Worth, Florida.

Examination of the record on appeal and consideration of the briefs and oral arguments of counsel fail to reveal the existence *106of reversible error in this cause. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS, J., SPECTOR, SAM, and NANCE, L. CLAYTON, Associate Judges, concur.
#### Horace WADE v. STATE.

No. 38772.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
# C_2021320EN.01003801.xml

| 9.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/38

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 June 2021 — Portugal v Commission

(Case T-95/21 R)

(Interim relief - State aid - State aid scheme implemented by Portugal in favour of the Madeira Free Zone - Application of that aid scheme in breach of Commission Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2021/C 320/43)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, L. Borrego, P. Barros da Costa, M. Marques and A. Soares de Freitas, acting as Agents, and by M. Gorjão Henriques and A. Saavedra, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission (represented by: P. Arenas and G. Braga da Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for interim measures seeking, first, suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal in favour of the Madeira Free Zone (MFZ) — Regime III and, second, that the Commission be ordered not to publish that decision in the Official Journal of the European Union until a judgment has been delivered in the main proceedings.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed;

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of LOUD Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, James T. Engen and TimO’Neil, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 6, 2003 | By:    |   | /s/ James T. Engen                      |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   |   | James T. Engen                          |   |
|                          |   |   | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|                          |   |   |                                    |   |
|                          |   |   |                                    |   |
|                          |   |   | /s/ Tim O’Neil                     |   |
|                          |   |   | Tim O’Neil                         |   |
|                          |   |   | *Chief Financial Officer*               |   |
|                               |        |        |                                         |        |  |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LOUDTechnologies Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COMC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY AS OF DECEMBER
31, 1996 INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM-10KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          57,180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  738,724
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     97,040
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               914,047
<PP&E>                                         205,446
<DEPRECIATION>                                  90,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,047,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          591,652
<BONDS>                                        166,667
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       124,981
<OTHER-SE>                                     163,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,047,049
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,033,583
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,142,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               929,986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (120,099)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,446
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (122,545)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (122,545)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023223EN.01001902.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 May 2023 — Ryanair v Commission (SAS II; COVID-19)

(Case T-238/21) (1)

(State aid - Danish and Swedish air transport markets - Aid granted by Denmark and Sweden to an airline in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic - Recapitalisation of SAS - Decision not to raise any objections - Actions for annulment - Individual concern - Substantial effect on the competitive position - Admissibility - Temporary Framework for State aid measures - Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State - Compliance with the requirements of the Temporary Framework)

(2023/C 223/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, F.-C. Laprévote, V. Blanc, S. Rating and I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, J. Carpi Badía and A. Bouchagiar, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: M. Søndahl Wolff, C. Maertens and C. Grønbech-Jensen, acting as Agents, and by R. Holdgaard, lawyer), Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: C. Meyer-Seitz, H. Shev, A. Runeskjöld, M. Salborn Hodgson, R. Shahsavan Eriksson, H. Eklinder and O. Simonsson, acting as Agents), SAS AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: F. Sjövall and A. Lundmark, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 5750 final of 17 August 2020 on State Aid SA.57543 (2020/N) — Denmark and SA.58342 (2020/N) — Sweden — COVID-19 recapitalisation of SAS AB.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2020) 5750 final of 17 August 2020 on State Aid SA.57543 (2020/N) — Denmark and SA.58342 (2020/N) — Sweden — COVID-19 recapitalisation of SAS AB; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2020) 5750 final of 17 August 2020 on State Aid SA.57543 (2020/N) — Denmark and SA.58342 (2020/N) — Sweden — COVID-19 recapitalisation of SAS AB;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ryanair DAC, with the exception of those related to the interventions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ryanair DAC, with the exception of those related to the interventions;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the Kingdom of Sweden and SAS to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by Ryanair as a result of their respective interventions. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the Kingdom of Sweden and SAS to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by Ryanair as a result of their respective interventions.

---

(1)  OJ C 242, 21.6.2021.

---
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                                                    ------------




                  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned Acting Chief Financial Officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:  July 12, 2004                         /s/ Tami J Story
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Tami J Story
                                             Acting Chief Financial Officer
1 

### Sutton, Lisa

From: Mastro, Donna
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 7:04 AM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Sutton, Lisa; Johansen, Amy Subject: FW: SSM SIP Call Final Rule

Attachments: McCabe letter to air directors final SSM SI P call 05-22-15.pdf; SSM SIP final rule_Fact Sheet.pdf

WV

Donna L. Mastro - EPA Region III – ORC - Air Branch Chief - (215) 814-2777

From: Esher, Diana

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:49 PM

To: Fred Durham; laura.m.crowder@wv.gov

Cc: Mastro, Donna; Arnold, David; Fernandez, Cristina; Johansen, Amy Subject: SSM SIP Call Final Rule



### I’m writing to inform you that earlier t oday, the Administrator signed a final action to ensure states have in place air pollution rules that appl y to sources at all times, includi ng periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction (SSM).

EPA is calling for 36 states, including your state, to make changes to their State Implementation Plans (SIPs), to protect public health and ensure consistency with th e Clean Air Act and EPA’s current SSM Policy. In response to this action, your state will need to correct specific SSM provisions in your state plan as indicated in

the final action.

The Clean Air Act allows a maximum of 18 months from the issuance of the final action to submit a SIP revision. Therefore your revised SIP subm ission is due to EPA by November 22, 2016.

For your information, here is the link to the pre-p ublication version of the final action signed today. http://www.epa.gov/airquality/ur banair/sipstatus/emissions.html SSM provisions for West Virginia ar e addressed in final action’s prepub lication version, unde r section IX, at subsection D. 4 (p. 457).

I have also attached a copy of a no tification letter signed by Acting Assistant Administrator Janet McCabe and a copy of the SSM Fact Sheet for your information.

We will continue to work closely with you to ensure this SIP revision process is as effi cient as possible. Please let me know if your have any questions.

Diana Esher Director, Air Prot ection Division EPA Region 3

215-814-2706 esher.diana@epa.gov