Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2020
                              William Gillen, M.D., ALJ Ruling 2020-8 (HHS CRD Mar. 19, 2020)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




William Gillen, M.D., ALJ Ruling 2020-8 (HHS CRD Mar. 19, 2020)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





William Gillen, M.D.
	(NPI: 1932460441; PTAN: H545000),
	Petitioners,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-17-947Ruling No. 2020-8March 19, 2020

        
              
    

      DISMISSAL
Petitioner, William Gillen, M.D., challenges the effective date of his participation in the Medicare program.  However, the Medicare contractor dismissed, as untimely, his request for reconsideration.  Petitioner then requested this review.  The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) moves to dismiss, arguing that Petitioner has no right to further review because he did not obtain a reconsidered determination.
I grant CMS's motion and dismiss this case.  Petitioner has no right to a hearing because he has not obtained a reconsidered determination.  Moreover, Petitioner is complaining that the Medicare contractor rejected an earlier enrollment application.  I have no authority to review a rejected application.  42 C.F.R. § 424.525(d).  I therefore dismiss this matter pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 498.70(b).
Background
Petitioner Gillen is an Ohio physician who applied for enrollment in the Medicare program.  On June 6, 2016, he submitted a Medicare enrollment application.  P. Ex. 1.  The application was apparently incomplete, and, in a letter dated June 24, 2016, the Medicare contractor (CGS) requested additional information.  The letter emphasized:
**Page 2**
"**Please note – if the information is not submitted until the 30th day and the information is incomplete or incorrect, no additional contact for corrections will be made and the application may be rejected**."  CMS Ex. 9 at 30 (emphasis in original).  Petitioner concedes that he did not submit the required information within the 30 days.  P. Br. at 4.  In a letter dated July 26, 2016, the contractor advised Petitioner that his application was rejected.  CMS Ex. 9 at 33.
On July 28, 2016, Petitioner submitted the information that the contractor had requested in its June 24 letter, and, in a letter dated August 11, 2016, the contractor acknowledged receiving the information on August 2, 2016, which it treated as a new application.  P. Ex. 2.  In a letter dated August 25, 2016, the contractor requested additional information, again warning that the application could be rejected if not submitted within 30 days.  CMS Ex. 9 at 46.  Petitioner claims to have submitted the requested information, but the contractor was obviously not satisfied.  In a letter dated September 26, 2016, the contractor rejected the August 2 application.  CMS Ex. 9 at 56.
Petitioner submitted yet another application on about November 4, 2016.  CMS Ex. 9 at 59; *see* CMS Ex. 9 at 112.  Again, in a letter dated November 16, 2016, the contractor requested additional information.  CMS Ex. 9 at 96, 100.  Although Petitioner claims to have emailed the requested information on December 14, 2016 (CMS Ex. 9 at 99), the contractor either did not receive it or was not satisfied and rejected the application.  CMS Ex. 9 at 112.
Finally, on December 30, 2016, Petitioner submitted another enrollment application.  CMS Exs. 3, 4.  In a letter dated January 12, the contractor requested additional information.  CMS Ex. 5.  Petitioner submitted that information (CMS Ex. 6), and, in a letter dated January 26, 2017, the Medicare contractor advised him that his enrollment application had been approved with an effective date of November 30, 2016.1
  CMS Ex. 7.  The notice also advised that, if he disagreed with the established effective date, Petitioner could request reconsideration before a contractor hearing officer.  CMS Ex. 7 at 2.  The notice incorrectly advised Petitioner that his request had to be submitted "within 60 calendar days of the postmark date of this letter."  CMS Ex. 7 at 2.  In fact, the regulations that govern reconsideration provide that the request must be filed "within 60 days from *receipt of the notice* of the initial determination."  42 C.F.R. § 498.22(b)(3)
**Page 3**
(emphasis added).2
  The date of receipt is presumed to be five days after the date on the notice unless there is a showing that it was, in fact, received earlier or later.  The letter warned that failing to request reconsideration timely "is deemed a waiver of all rights to further administrative review."  CMS Ex. 7 at 2.
Petitioner's request for reconsideration is dated May 11, 2017, long after the deadline.  CMS Ex. 2.  On May 23, 2017, the contractor dismissed Petitioner's request for reconsideration because it was not filed within the designated timeframe.  CMS Ex. 1.
Discussion
To receive Medicare payments for services furnished to program beneficiaries, a Medicare supplier must be enrolled in the Medicare program.  42 C.F.R. § 424.505.  To enroll in Medicare, a prospective supplier must complete and submit an enrollment application.  42 C.F.R. §§ 424.510(d)(1); 424.515(a).  When CMS determines that a supplier meets the applicable enrollment requirements, it grants him Medicare billing privileges.  For physicians, the effective date for billing privileges "is the *later* of the date of filing" a subsequently approved enrollment application or "the date an enrolled physician . . . first began furnishing services at a new practice location."  42 C.F.R. § 424.520(d) (emphasis added).
CMS's determination as to the effective date of enrollment is an "initial determination" that is subject to review under the procedures set forth in 42 C.F.R. Part 498.  42 C.F.R. §§ 498.3(a)(1), (b)(15).  A supplier or prospective supplier dissatisfied with an initial determination may request reconsideration by filing a written request within 60 days from receipt of the notice of the initial determination.  42 C.F.R. §§ 498.5(d)(1); 498.5(l)(1); 498.22.  If CMS (or its contractor) receives a properly-filed request for reconsideration, it makes a reconsidered determination affirming or modifying the initial determination.  42 C.F.R. § 498.24(c).  A supplier or prospective supplier dissatisfied with a reconsidered determination is entitled to a hearing before an administrative law judge.  42 C.F.R. §§ 498.5(d)(2); 498.5(l)(2); 498.40.  The regulations do not provide for a hearing in the absence of a reconsidered determination, even though this "may in certain situations be unfair[.]"  *Ramaswamy v. Burwell*, 83 F. Supp.3d 846, 854 (E.D. Mo. 2015); *Rollington Ferguson, M.D.*, DAB No. 2949 (2019); *Denise A. Hardy*, *D.P.M.*, DAB No. 2464 at 4-5 (2012); *Hiva Vakil, M.D.*, DAB No. 2460 at 4-5 (2012).
**Page 4**
Finally, even if I could overlook the absence of a reconsidered determination (which I cannot), Petitioner could not prevail.  He complains that the contractor rejected his August 2016 application.  P. Br. at 6.  I have no authority to review a rejected application.  42 C.F.R. § 424.525(d).
Conclusion
Because neither CMS nor its contractor issued a reconsidered determination, Petitioner does not have a right to an ALJ hearing.  I therefore dismiss his hearing request pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 498.70(b).


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. As I have noted elsewhere, Medicare contractors sometimes conflate the effective date with the retrospective billing date.  Here, November 30, 2016, is not the effective date of Petitioner's enrollment, which can be no earlier than December 30, 2016, the date he submitted his subsequently-approved enrollment application.  42 C.F.R. § 424.520(d).  CMS may authorize a supplier to bill retrospectively for up to 30 days, which it apparently did here.  See Primary Care of Bonne Terre LLC, DAB CR5053 at 4 (2018). back to note 1
                      2. Although I urge CMS to amend its misleading notice letters so that they accurately reflect the regulations, the error is irrelevant here inasmuch as Petitioner did not request reconsideration until May 11, 2017, well after the 60-day period had expired. back to note 2 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back