alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022284EN.01003302.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/33

---

Order of the General Court of 2 May 2022 — Airoldi Metalli v Commission

(Case T-328/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Dumping - Imports of aluminium extrusions originating in China - Act imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty - Importer - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Act not of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 284/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Airoldi Metalli SpA (Molteno, Italy) (represented by: M. Campa, M. Pirovano, D. Rovetta, G. Pandey, P. Gjørtler and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/546 of 29 March 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of aluminium extrusions originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2021 L 109, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Airoldi Metalli SpA shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Airoldi Metalli SpA shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.

---
257 La. 616

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. W. D. UTZ v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51130.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1971.

In re: W. D. Utz applying for writs of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ granted. Evidentiary hearing ordered limited to whether involuntary plea coerced by failure of authorities to give medical treatment.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1023

To provide that no funds may be expended in fiscal year 1994 by the

Department of the Interior for the conduct of preleasing and leasing

activities in the Atlantic for Outer Continental Shelf Lease Sale 164

in the April 1992 proposal for the Outer Continental Shelf Natural

Gas and Oil Resource Management Comprehensive Program, 1992–1997.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mr. BRADLEY) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and

Natural Resources

A BILL

To provide that no funds may be expended in fiscal year

1994 by the Department of the Interior for the conduct

of preleasing and leasing activities in the Atlantic for

Outer Continental Shelf Lease Sale 164 in the April

1992 proposal for the Outer Continental Shelf Natural

Gas and Oil Resource Management Comprehensive Program, 1992–1997.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That no funds may be expended in fiscal year 1994 by

4 the Department of the Interior for the conduct of

5 preleasing and leasing activities in the Atlantic for Outer
2

S 1023 IS

1 Continental Shelf Lease Sale 164 in the April 1992 pro2 posal for the Outer Continental Shelf Natural Gas and

3 Oil Resource Management Comprehensive Program,

4 1992–1997.

Æ
# C_2021513EN.01001701.xml

| 20.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 513/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 513/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pfälzisches Oberlandesgericht (Germany) lodged on 24 August 2021 — MS v Saatgut Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH

(Case C-522/21)

(2021/C 513/25)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Pfälzisches Oberlandesgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Defendant and appellant: MS

Applicant and respondent: Saatgut Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH

Question referred

Is Article 18(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1768/95 of 24 July 1995 implementing rules on the agricultural exemption provided for in Article 14(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 on Community plant variety rights, (1) in so far as a minimum level of compensation of quadruple the licence fee can be claimed under the conditions laid down therein, compatible with Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community plant variety rights (‘the Basic Regulation’), (2) in particular with the first sentence of Article 94(2) of that regulation?

---

(1)  OJ 1995 L 173, p. 14.

(2)  OJ 1994 L 227, p. 1.

---
# C_2021242EN.01000801.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 23 March 2021 — absoluts-bikes and more- GmbH & Co. KG v the-trading-company GmbH

(Case C-179/21)

(2021/C 242/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: absoluts-bikes and more- GmbH & Co. KG

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: the-trading-company GmbH

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the mere existence of a manufacturer’s guarantee trigger the information requirement under Article 6(1)(m) of Directive 2011/83/EU? (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the mere existence of a manufacturer’s guarantee trigger the information requirement under Article 6(1)(m) of Directive 2011/83/EU? (1)

| 2. | If Question 1 is answered in the negative: Is the information requirement under Article 6(1)(m) of Directive 2011/83 triggered by the mere mention of a manufacturer’s guarantee in the trader’s offering or is it triggered only if the mention of such a guarantee is readily apparent to the consumer? Is there also an information requirement if it is readily apparent to the consumer that the trader provides access to only the manufacturer’s information concerning the guarantee? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If Question 1 is answered in the negative: Is the information requirement under Article 6(1)(m) of Directive 2011/83 triggered by the mere mention of a manufacturer’s guarantee in the trader’s offering or is it triggered only if the mention of such a guarantee is readily apparent to the consumer? Is there also an information requirement if it is readily apparent to the consumer that the trader provides access to only the manufacturer’s information concerning the guarantee?

| 3. | Must the information on the existence and conditions of a manufacturer’s guarantee as required under Article 6(1)(m) of Directive 2011/83 contain the same details as a guarantee under Article 6(2) of Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees (2) or are fewer details sufficient? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Must the information on the existence and conditions of a manufacturer’s guarantee as required under Article 6(1)(m) of Directive 2011/83 contain the same details as a guarantee under Article 6(2) of Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees (2) or are fewer details sufficient?

---

(1)  Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64).

(2)  OJ 1999 L 171, p. 12.

---
# C_2021242EN.01000401.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Śródmieścia w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 9 February 2021 — B.S., Ł.S. v M.

(Case C-82/21)

(2021/C 242/06)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Śródmieścia w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: B.S., Ł.S.

Defendant: M.

Question referred

Must Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, as well as the principles of equivalence, effectiveness and legal certainty, be interpreted as precluding a judicial interpretation of national legislation to the effect that a consumer’s claim for the reimbursement of amounts unduly paid on the basis of an unfair term in a contract concluded between a seller or supplier and a consumer is subject to a ten-year limitation period which begins to run from the date of each performance by the consumer, even in the case where the consumer was not aware of the unfair nature of that term?

---

(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.

---
# C_2022138EN.01001701.xml

| 28.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional (Spain) lodged on 31 December 2021 — Endesa Generación, S.A.U. v Tribunal Económico Administrativo Central

(Case C-833/21)

(2022/C 138/19)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Audiencia Nacional

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Endesa Generación, S.A.U.

Defendant: Tribunal Económico Administrativo Central

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the Spanish legislation which provides for a tax on coal used for electricity generation compatible with Article 14(1)(a) of Directive 2003/96/EC, (1) when, despite stating that its aim is to protect the environment, that aim is not reflected in the structure of the tax and the tax levied is used to finance the costs of the electricity system? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the Spanish legislation which provides for a tax on coal used for electricity generation compatible with Article 14(1)(a) of Directive 2003/96/EC, (1) when, despite stating that its aim is to protect the environment, that aim is not reflected in the structure of the tax and the tax levied is used to finance the costs of the electricity system?

| 2. | Is it possible to consider that the environmental aim is given concrete expression in the structure of the tax on the ground that the tax rates are set in relation to the calorific value of coal used for electricity generation? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is it possible to consider that the environmental aim is given concrete expression in the structure of the tax on the ground that the tax rates are set in relation to the calorific value of coal used for electricity generation?

| 3. | Is the environmental aim achieved simply by reason of the fact that taxes have been imposed on certain non-renewable energy products and that no tax is levied on the use of such products where they are considered to be less harmful to the environment? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is the environmental aim achieved simply by reason of the fact that taxes have been imposed on certain non-renewable energy products and that no tax is levied on the use of such products where they are considered to be less harmful to the environment?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51).

---
#### Isiah HAMILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-632.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

May 16, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 11, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00700

- CV

IN RE IMPLICITY MANA GEMENT COMPANY

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez , J ustice

Irene Rios , Justice

On October 10 , 20 1 9 , relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a n emergency

motion to sta y litigation pending final resolution of the petition for writ of manda mus

. This

court believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further

consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The respondent an d the real part y in interest may file

a response to the petition in t his court no later than October 29, 2019

. Any such response must

conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

Relator ’ s request for a stay is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART

. The trial

court’s September 16, 2019 “Order on Defendant, American Risk Insurance Company ’s Second

Amended Motion to Compel and For Sanctions ” is STAYED pending final resolution of the

petition for writ of mandamus. The trial court’ s hearing scheduled f or October 14, 2019 on (1)

relator ’ s motion to quash the subject depositions and (2) the real party in interest ’ s motion to

enforce the taking of the subject dep ositions and for sanctions is STAYED pending final

resolution of the petiti on for writ of manda mus. Relator ’ s request to stay all trial court

proceedings in the underlying case is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on October 11, 2019

. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_______________________ Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016CI11019 , styled Implicity Management Company v. American Risk

Insurance Co., Inc. , pending in the 224th Judicial District C ourt

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Cathleen M.

Stryker presid ing.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 139 (Thursday, July 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34143-34144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15358]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C.,

[[Page 34144]]

as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; NIDA International Research and Training Program 
Support Services (1158).
    Date: August 9, 2018.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Susan O. McGuire, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Extramural Policy and Review, National Institute 
on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 6001 Executive 
Blvd., Room 4245, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-827-5817, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#68050b0f1d011a0d1b07280509010446060100460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d404e4a58445f485e426d404c444103434445034a425b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No.: 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 13, 2018.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-15358 Filed 7-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2023296EN.01003002.xml

| 21.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 July 2023 — OC v EEAS

(Case T-770/21) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Staff of the EEAS - Psychological harassment - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Refusal of the request - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Concept of ‘psychological harassment’ - Manifest error of assessment - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff)

(2023/C 296/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: OC (represented by: L. Levi, N. Flandin and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: K. Kouri, R. Spáč and A. Ireland, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 10 September 2020 by which the latter refused her request for assistance.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders OC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 31.1.2022.

---
EXHIBIT 99.3-THE COMPANY'S FORM 8-K/A DATED FEBRUARY 9, 1996


                 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549
                                   FORM 8-K/A



                         CURRENT REPORT (AMENDED)
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
 


                    Date of Report:  February 9, 1996




                      ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY INC.
                         (A Washington Corporation)

                         Commission File no. 2-92949-S
                  IRS Employer Identification no. 91-1238077

                             415 N. Quay St. #4
                            Kennewick  WA  99336
                  (Address of principal executive offices)


     Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(509) 735-9092
<PAGE>
ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS

In preparation of year end financial statements, bad debt expense will 
be incurred, and the Company's accounts receivable balance will be 
reduced, in the amount of $57,204 for amounts owed to the Company by 
Diversified Engineering, of Richmond, Virginia.  Due to lack of payment 
on the part of Diversified Engineering, it was considered necessary by 
Management to reduce the Company's accounts receivable balance for 
those amounts not paid by Diversified.

The Company's products, with a value of $57,204, were provided to 
Diversified in the summer of 1995 for installation in a water treatment 
plant project.  To date the Company has not received any payments. The 
Company has retained counsel, and is examining legal options to 
expedite collection of the amounts owed to the Company.

<PAGE>
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by 
the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC.

T.L. KIRCHNER
  
By: T.L. Kirchner
President
Date: MAR 15 1996
# C_2022158EN.01000201.xml

| 11.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/2

---

Appeal brought on 24 August 2021 by Antonius Maria Vervloet and Cornelia Wilhelmina Vervloet-Mulder against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 25 June 2021 in Case T-211/21 Vervloet and Vervloet-Mulder v AREB

(Case C-526/21 P)

(2022/C 158/02)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Appellants: Antonius Maria Vervloet, Cornelia Wilhelmina Vervloet-Mulder (represented by: P. Van der Veld, advocaat)

Other party to the proceedings: Agència Estatal de Resolució d’Entitats Bancàries (AREB)

By order of 1 March 2021, the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) declares the appeal manifestly inadmissible and Antonius Maria Vervloet and Cornelia Wilhelmina Vervloet-Mulder are ordered to bear their own costs.

---
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1102

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-(a-acetonyl benzyl)-4-hydroxycoumarin

sodium salt.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 15, 1993

Mr. ROTH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-(a-acetonyl benzyl)-

4-hydroxycoumarin sodium salt.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 3-(A-ACETONYL BENZYL)-4-HYDROXYCOUMARIN

4 SODIUM SALT.

5 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar6 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

7 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 3-(a-acetonyl

benzyl)-4-

hydroxycoumarin sodium

salt (provided

for in subheading

2932.29.20) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/96 ’’.
2

•S 1102 IS

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fourteen weeks ended March 4, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark W. McCutcheon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   April 12, 2005


/s/ Mark W. McCutcheon
----------------------
Mark W. McCutcheon
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                       25
EXHIBIT 23.1






INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements
Nos. 33-42222,  33-41542,  33-41543,  33-59187,  33-60901,  33-60591,  33-82474,
333-68399  and  333-95113 of Sierra  Health  Services,  Inc. on Forms S-8 of our
report dated February 14, 2000,  appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Sierra Health Services, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1999.

Las Vegas, Nevada
March 24, 2000


<PAGE>
# C_2021297EN.01001501.xml

| 26.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/15

---

Appeal brought on 28 January 2021 by Topcart GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 18 November 2020 in Case T-377/19, Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office

(Case C-48/21 P)

(2021/C 297/15)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Topcart GmbH (represented by: M. Hoffmann, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Carl International

By order of 12 May 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) did not allow the appeal to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.

---