alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020103EN.01003301.xml

| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/33

---

Action brought on 3 February 2020 — Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v EUIPO (MASTIHACARE)

(Case T-60/20)

(2020/C 103/47)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou (Chios, Greece) (represented by: A-E. Malami, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for international registration designating the European Union of the word mark MASTIHACARE — Application for registration No 1388895;

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 November 2019 in Case R 692/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | admit the present action; |
| --- | --- |

—

admit the present action;

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | permit the registration under No 1388895 of the international trade mark ‘MASTIHACARE’ designating the EU, for all goods in Class 3; |
| --- | --- |

—

permit the registration under No 1388895 of the international trade mark ‘MASTIHACARE’ designating the EU, for all goods in Class 3;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs under Article 190(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs under Article 190(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in the failure to state reasons in the contested decision of the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in the failure to state reasons in the contested decision of the Board of Appeal.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark (OJ 2017 L 154, p. 1).

---
# Official Journal C 431A/15 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 431A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6015 December 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 431A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6015 December 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 431 A/01 | Publication of a vacancy for the Executive Director of the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) — Lisbon (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2017/20025 | 1 |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2017/C 431 A/02 | Call for applications | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2017/C 431 A/01

Publication of a vacancy for the Executive Director of the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) — Lisbon (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2017/20025

1

Court of Justice of the European Union

2017/C 431 A/02

Call for applications

6

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 109

To amend section 923 of title 18, United States Code, to require the keeping

of records with respect to dispositions of ammunition, and to require

a study of the use and possible regulation of sales of ammunition.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself and Mr. CHAFEE) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend section 923 of title 18, United States Code, to

require the keeping of records with respect to dispositions

of ammunition, and to require a study of the use and

possible regulation of sales of ammunition.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RECORDS OF DISPOSITION OF AMMUNITION.

4 (a) AMENDMENT OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES

5 CODE.—Section 923(g) of title 18, United States Code,

6 is amended—

7 (1) in paragraph (1)(A) by inserting after the

8 second sentence ‘‘Each licensed importer and manu-
2

•S 109 IS

1 facturer of ammunition shall maintain such records

2 of importation, production, shipment, sale, or other

3 disposition of ammunition at his place of business

4 for such period and in such form as the Secretary

5 may by regulations prescribe. Such records shall in6 clude the amount, caliber, and type of ammuni7 tion.’’; and

8 (2) by adding at the end thereof the following

9 new paragraph:

10 ‘‘(6) Each licensed importer or manufacturer of am11 munition shall annually prepare a summary report of im12 ports, production, shipments, sales, and other dispositions

13 during the preceding year. The report shall be prepared

14 on a form specified by the Secretary, shall include the

15 amounts, calibers, and types of ammunition that were dis16 posed of, and shall be forwarded to the office specified

17 thereon not later than the close of business on the date

18 specified by the Secretary.’’.

19 (b) STUDY OF CRIMINAL USE AND REGULATION OF

20 AMMUNITION.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall re21 quest the National Academy of Sciences to—

22 (1) prepare, in consultation with the Secretary,

23 a study of the criminal use and regulation of ammu24 nition; and
3

•S 109 IS

1 (2) to submit to Congress, not later than July

2 31, 1996, a report with recommendations on the po3 tential for preventing crime by regulating or restrict4 ing the availability of ammunition.

Æ
# C_2021490EN.01004202.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Ciano Trading & Services CT & S and Others v Commission

(Case T-45/21) (1)

(Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Sustainable restoration for the Commission in Brussels and its surroundings - Annulment of the tendering procedure - Legitimate expectations - Abuse of rights)

(2021/C 490/50)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Ciano Trading & Services CT & S SpA (Fiumicino, Italy), Silvia Brizio (Venaria Reale, Italy), Laurence André (Grivegnée, Belgium), Lidia Pacitti (Neder-over-Heembeek, Belgium) (represented by: D. Gillet and S. Van Besien, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Van Noyen and M. Ilkova, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission decision of 20 November 2020 annulling tendering procedure OIB/2019/CPN/0039 concerning sustainable restoration for the Commission in the Brussels-Capital Region and its surroundings.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ciano Trading & Services CT & S SpA, Silvia Brizio, Laurence André and Lidia Pacitti to pay the costs relating to the main proceedings and to the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ciano Trading & Services CT & S SpA, Silvia Brizio, Laurence André and Lidia Pacitti to pay the costs relating to the main proceedings and to the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.

---
#### Elise Cecile SAUCE, wife of/and Larry A. Sauce, Individually, etc., et al. v. R. A. BUSSELLE, Allstate Insurance Co., etc., et al.

No. 53922.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 20, 1973.

In re: Elise Cecile Sauce, wife of/and Larry A. Sauce, Individually and on behalf of their minor children, Corey P. Sauce, Jed A. Sauce, Derin A. Sauce, Shane T. Sauce, Neysa A. Sauce and C. W. Ram-shur and Mrs. C. W. Ramshur applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

SANDERS, C. J., takes no part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  from  unaudited
Statements of Financial  Condition at Decmber 31, 1998 and unaudited  Statements
of Operations for the six-months ended December 31, 1998, which are contained in
the body of the  accompanying  Form 10-Q and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                       0
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           31,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             0
<PP&E>                                                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         830,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        0
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                 1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                               34,783
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            830,456
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             0
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         2,093
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (2,093)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              (912)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (1,181)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (1,181)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023007EN.01000802.xml

| 9.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie — Belgium) — VP Capital NV v Belgische Staat

(Case C-414/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of establishment - Article 49 and 54 TFEU - Transfer of a company’s registered office to a Member State other than that in which it was incorporated - Recovery of write-downs recorded prior to the transfer - Exemption - Comparability of situations)

(2023/C 7/10)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van Cassatie

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: VP Capital NV

Respondent: Belgische Staat

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 TFEU does not preclude national tax legislation under which increases in value of shares in companies recorded by a company in a Member State, after the transfer of its registered office in that Member State, are treated as being expressed but unrealised capital gains, without taking into account whether those shares gave rise to the recording of write-downs by that company on a date on which it was a taxable resident of another Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 368, 13.9.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 1,
2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                              19
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,539
<ALLOWANCES>                                        28
<INVENTORY>                                      2,027
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,777
<PP&E>                                          15,977
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,937
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,323
<BONDS>                                          5,476
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           155
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,157
<SALES>                                          5,421
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,421
<CGS>                                            4,047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,027
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   265
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     4
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    377
<INCOME-TAX>                                       143
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                234
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       234
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Georgia-Pacific Group EPS - Basic    1.13
The Timber Company EPS - Basic           0.49
<F2>Georgia-Pacific Group EPS - Diluted  1.11
The Timber Company EPS - Diluted         0.49
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Sam N. SPODOFORA and Jerold R. Smith, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. R-354, R-355.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 13, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 25, 1974.

Dan R. Warren, R. M. Cass, Jr., and Joseph Garlovsky, of Judge, Warren, Cass & Garlovsky, Daytona Beach, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Donald K. Rudser, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The record on appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties herein having been fully considered and it appearing therefrom that appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgments appealed are therefore Affirmed.

SPECTOR, Acting C. J., JOHNSON and BOYER, JJ., concur.
258 La. 560

#### UNIVERSAL C. I. T. CREDIT CORPORATION v. Carl A. SPRING.

No. 51358.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 3, 1971.

In re: Carl A. Spring applying for cer-tiorari,'or writ of review, to the' Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangi-pahoa. 242 So.2d 73.

Not considered. Not timely filed.
3/12/2015 TDCJ Offender Details 4^ OOO- O)

Texas Department of Criminal Justice too Home 5jH New Offender Search

Offender Information Details

Return to Search list

SID Number:

TDCJ Number:

Name:

Race:

Gender:

DOB:

Maximum Sentence Date:

Current Facility:

Projected Release Date:

Parole Eligibility Date:

Offender Visitation Eligible:

50113494

01977794

WIESEMEYER.RUSSELL

W

M

1987-07-16

NOT AVAILABLE

EAST TEXAS TREATMENT FACILITY

NOT AVAILABLE

NOT AVAILABLE

YESInformation provided is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times

per day

on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family

members and

friends are encouraged to call the unit prior to traveling for a visit.

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE:

Scheduled Release Date:

Scheduled Release Type:

Scheduled Release

Location:

Offense History:

Offender is not scheduled for release at

this time.

Will be determined when release date is

scheduled.

Will be determined when release date is

scheduled.

Offense Date Offense Sentence Date County Case No. Sentence (YY-MM-DD)

http://offender.tdcj ,state.tx.us/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=50113494 1/2
3/12/2015 TDCJ Offender Details

Return to Search list

The Texas Department of Criminal Justice updates this information regularly to ensure that it is

complete and accurate, however this information can change quickly. Therefore, the information on

this site may not reflect the true current location, status, scheduled termination date, or other

information regarding an offender.

For questions and comments, you may contact the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, at (936)

295-6371 or webadmin&.tdcj.texas.aov. This information is made available to the public and law

enforcement in the interest ofpublic safety. Any unauthorized use of this information is forbidden and

subject to criminal prosecution.

New Offender Search TDCJ Home Page

http://offender.tdcj .state.tx.us/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=50113494 2/2
# C_2021098EN.01001502.xml

| 22.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 19 January 2021 — ‘Konservinvest’ OOD v ‘Bulkons Parvomay’ OOD

(Case C-35/21)

(2021/C 98/15)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven kasatsionen sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in cassation:‘Konservinvest’ OOD

Respondent in cassation:‘Bulkons Parvomay’ OOD

Question referred

Does Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs allow, outside the cases of transitional protection provided for in that provision, a national system for the registration and protection of geographical indications for agricultural products and foodstuffs covered by that regulation, and does that provision leave Member States free to apply at national level other rules that are applicable in parallel (similar to the parallel system for trade marks) in order to settle legal disputes concerning infringements of the right to such a geographical indication between local traders who produce and market agricultural products and foodstuffs covered by Regulation No 1151/2012 within the Member State in which the geographical indication was registered?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ 2012 L 343, p. 1).

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 83 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 83

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the cost-of-
living adjustment provisions under title II of the Social Security Act 
                          should be preserved.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 1993

  Mr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Emerson, Ms. Danner, Mr. 
Quinn, Mr. Fields of Texas, Mr. King, Mr. Machtley, Mr. Lightfoot, and 
 Mr. Rahall) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the cost-of-
living adjustment provisions under title II of the Social Security Act 
                          should be preserved.

Whereas the social security cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) was authorized by 
        the Congress in 1972 so that recipients' benefits could keep up with the 
        ever-rising cost of keeping modest means;
Whereas the annual COLA is based on the Consumer Price Index as determined by 
        the Department of Labor;
Whereas social security is off budget and thus should be free from political 
        considerations;
Whereas the social security trust funds currently total over $300,000,000, 
        guaranteeing that retirees will continue to receive funds well into the 
        next century;
Whereas a freeze on the COLA would affect all 48,000,000 social security 
        beneficiaries, including children and disabled individuals;
Whereas 500,000 senior citizens would fall under the poverty line in the event 
        of such a freeze;
Whereas a COLA freeze is compounded year after year, never to be recouped by the 
        recipient;
Whereas that senior citizens cannot afford to be without much-needed funds in 
        this current economic climate;
Whereas elderly social security beneficiaries already have $1 of every $3 earned 
        over $10,560 taken away due to the social security earnings test; and
Whereas the notch problem also substantially reduces millions of senior 
        citizens' retirement checks: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the provisions of section 215(i) of the Social Security Act providing 
for cost-of-living adjustments under the old-age, survivors, and 
disability insurance program under title II of such Act are essential 
to the integrity of such program and must not be interrupted or 
restricted.

                                 <all>
```