alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 2.1 - Form 8-K dated January 15, 2001

       UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                        WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549
                                FORM 8-K



                            CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                Date of Report:  January 15, 2001




                 ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY INC.
                      (A Washington Corporation)

                   Commission File no. 000-27793
            IRS Employer Identification no. 91-1238077

                       415 N. Quay St. #4
                      Kennewick  WA  99336
             (Address of principal executive offices)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(509) 735-9092































<PAGE>
ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS

The Company was informed on January 15, 2001 of the death of
Company Director, Arthur W. Leighton.  Mr. Leighton's death from
respiratory difficulties was sudden and unexpected.

Mr. Leighton was an original director of the Company and was expected
to participate on the Company's Audit Committee.  The Company intends
to operate the Audit Committee with two members until that time when
a Director with the necessary expertise can be located to serve on
both the Board of Directors and Audit Committee of the Company.
















































<PAGE>
                               SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC.

/s/ T. L. KIRCHNER

By: T.L. Kirchner
President
Date: January 26, 2001
] 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The U w Offices Of 

MARH & ASSOCIATES 

3325 Wilshire Blvd.. Suite 1350 

Los Angeles, Gilifomia 90010 

(213) 487-9190; Fax (213) 487-9484 

David Maili (SM 206917) 

Simon H Zjnger(SB# 102775) 

Gordon Turner (SB# 228215 

Attorneys for Entertainment Fusion Group 

'HFARTMENTOF 

•'• I'UKLI OrrfiAilOMS 

:0!; m 2\ A n 0 3 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.D. 

lii the matter of: 

ENTERTAINMENT FUSION GROUP 

) FAA Docket: Not Assigned 

) FAACaseNo. 2011NM710001 

) DMSNo.:FA-2011-1290 

) 

) Judge: Richard C. Goodwin 

) 

TO: HONORABLE GOODWIN 

MOTION FOR LATE FILING OF ANSWER 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Entertainment Fusion Group brings this Motion for leave 

to file its answer to the complaint late. An agreement was entered into for Entertainment.Fusion 

Group to file its Answer by February 3, 2012. The answer was not filed on February 3, 2012, but 

has been filed, by federal express (with fax copies served on interested parties) on February 10, 

2012. As there appears to be no prejudice to all parties, it is requested by Entertainment Fusion 

Group that their answer be allowed filed on February 10, 2012. 

DATED: February 10, 2012 MARH & ASSOCIATES 

By: . 

/ -^lORDON TURNER 

Attorneys for Entertaimnent 

Fusion Group 

MOTION FOR LATE FILING OF ANSWER 

Z:\MyFiles\Civil\3SI6 Entertainment Fusion\Mot4LiteFiling.wpd 
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

I, the undersigned, say: I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. 

I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within action. My business address is 3325 

Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1350, Los Angeles, California 90010. 

On February 10,20121 served the foregoing documents described asMOTION FOR LATE 

FILING on the interested parties in this action by faxing A TRUE COPY THEREOF addressed as 

follows: 

Kyle E. Lomazow 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue 

Renton, WA 98057 

Fax:425-227-1007 

Hon. Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, —20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Fax: 202-366-7536 

Executed February 10, 2012 at Los Angeles, California. 

MOTION FOR LATE FILING OF ANSWER 

Z.\MyFilesdviHJSI6 Entertainmenr Fusion\Mot4LateFi}ing.\^'pd
#### MURRAY et al. *v.*WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 37,

September Term, 1961.]

*Decided November 20, 1961.*

Before Bruñe, C. J., and Henderson, Hammond, Prescott, Horney, Marbury and SybeRT, JJ.

PER Curiam.

Two brothers seek leave to appeal their petitions (in almost identical language) for relief under the P. C. P. A. On May 3, 1960, they plead guilty to murder in the Circuit Court for Dorchester County, and, after hearing testimony, Chief Judge Henry determined they were guilty of second degree murder, and sentenced them to 18 years’ confinement. No appeal followed.

Their petitions were dismissed by the court below on June 2, *6471961. The applications for leave to appeal were not filed until August 11, 1961; hence they were too late. Code (1961 Cum. Supp.), Article 27, Section 64S-I.

The applications set forth eight alleged complaints, and quote the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth (Section 1) Amendments to the United States Constitution. Judge Henry had a full hearing upon their petitions, and he was unable to discover any merit in their contentions. After reading the petitions and the transcript of the proceedings at the hearing, we arrive at the same conclusion. For the reasons set forth in Judge Henry’s opinion and the delay in asking leave to appeal, the applications will be denied.

*Applications denied.*
#### Thomas E. MURCHISON, Appellant, v. Robert NORMAN, Appellee.

No. 71-883.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 22, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE ex rel. CITY OF OPA LOCKA v. Gene WILLIAMS.

No. 38542.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 220 So.2d 708.
EXHIBIT 2.4 - Form 8-K dated December 9, 1996



         UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                        WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

                               FORM 8-K



                             CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  


                    Date of Report:  December 9, 1996



                     ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY INC.
                        (A Washington Corporation)

                      Commission File no. 2-92949-S
                IRS Employer Identification no. 91-1238077

                           415 N. Quay St. #4
                          Kennewick  WA  99336
                  (Address of principal executive offices)


    Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(509) 735-9092




























<PAGE>
ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS

On December 9, 1996,  Mr. Art Leighton, a Director for the Company,
purchased 25,000 shares of Company stock from the open market. 
Mr. Leighton stated that his  decision to purchase Company stock was 
primarily influenced by the opinion that the Company stock is currently
undervalued.  As a result of the purchase, Mr. Leighton's holding in the 
Company increased to 84,000 shares, representing 1.7% of the 4,953,667
shares of outstanding common stock as of December 9, 1996.


















































<PAGE>
                                SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the 
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the 
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC.

  T.L. KIRCHNER
  
By: T.L. Kirchner
President
Date: December 16, 1996
EXHIBIT (23)-1-

                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the partners of Unimar Company

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statement (Post-effective amendment No. 2 on Form S-3 to Form S-
14 (No. 2-93037)) of Unimar Company of our report dated March 5,
1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Unimar
Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the
related consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows and
changes in partners' capital and comprehensive income for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which
report appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-
K of Unimar Company.




                                          KPMG LLP


       





Houston, Texas
March 19, 1999
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

December 16, 2010

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Environmental Groups

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on Friday, December 10, 2010 between several 

environmental groups and EPA and included the following individuals:

Luke Tonafel (NRDC), Don Anair (UCS), Therese Langer (ACEEE), Siddiq Khan 

(ACEEE), Coralie Cooper (NESCAUM), Vickie Patton (EDF), Drew Kodjak (ICCT), 

Hilary Sinnamon (EDF), Ben Sharpe (ICCT), Jesse Prentice-Dunn (Sierra Club)

EPA: Byron Bunker, Cheryl Bynum, Tony Fernandez, and Angela Cullen

The discussion focused on stringency of the proposed engine and vehicle standards, advanced 

technology credits, and data collection.
251 La. 65

#### French JORDAN v. The 26TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE et al.

No. 48919.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 22, 1967.

In re: French Jordan applying for writ of certiorari or review. 202 So.2d 681.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.
EX-10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE 
 THIS
FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE (the “Amendment”) is dated as of the 15th day of February, 2021 and is made by and between Osprey Technology Acquisition Corp. II (the “Maker”) and Osprey Technology Sponsor II,
LLC (the “Payee”). 
 RECITALS 
  

	A.	 Maker executed that certain Promissory Note dated September 30, 2020 in the principal sum of up to Three
Hundred Thousand dollars ($300,000) (the “Note”). 


  

	B.	 The Note matured on December 31, 2020. 



 

	C.	 Maker and Payee have agreed to make certain amendments to the Note. 



 

	D.	 Unless otherwise set forth herein, all other provisions of the Note shall remain in full force and effect.



  

	E.	 All capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment will have the meanings given to them in the Note.



 In consideration of these promises, the mutual covenants contained in this Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
 1.    Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended and
restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “Principal. The principal balance of this Note shall be
repayable on the earlier of (the “Maturity Date”) (a) the date on which Maker consummates an initial public offering (“IPO”) and (b) June 30, 2021. The principal balance may be prepaid at any time.” 

[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date
first above written. 
  

			
	MAKER:
	
	OSPREY TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION CORP. II
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David DiDomenico

	Name:	 	David DiDomenico
	Title:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	
	PAYEE:
	
	OSPREY TECHNOLOGY SPONSOR II, LLC
		
	By:	 	 Jeffrey F. Brotman

	Name:	 	Jeffrey F. Brotman
	Title:	 	Secretary



  
 Signature page to
First Amendment to Promissory Note
#### George F. ROBINSON v. William P. ATKINS and the Democratic Executive Committee of Claiborne Parish.

No. 53353.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 12, 1973.

In re: George F. Robinson applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Claiborne. 275 So.2d 444.

Writ refused. No error of law.
Exhibit 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Solely in connection with the filing of theQuarterly Report of Retractable Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the United StatesSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned Thomas J. Shaw, Chief Executive Officer, and Douglas W. Cowan,Chief Financial Officer, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the issuer.

 

Date:                    November 15, 2010

 

 
|   | /s/  Thomas J. Shaw                         |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | THOMAS  J. SHAW                             |
|   | PRESIDENT,  CHAIRMAN, AND                   |
|   | CHIEF  EXECUTIVE OFFICER                    |
|   |                                        |
|   |                                        |
|   | /s/  Douglas W. Cowan                       |
|   | DOUGLAS  W. COWAN                           |
|   | VICE  PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |

 

----
# C_2023179EN.01003501.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)

(Case T-588/21) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a part of the fluid distribution equipment - Ground for invalidity - Non-compliance with requirements for protection - Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function - Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)

(2023/C 179/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by: T. Wuttke and J. Lewandowski, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Koopman International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: G. van den Bergh, A. van Hoek and B. Brouwer, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Tinnus Enterprises LLC, seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 July 2021 (Case R 1008/2018-3) (‘the contested decision’).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Tinnus Enterprises LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Koopman International BV. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Tinnus Enterprises LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Koopman International BV.

---

(1)  OJ C 471, 22.11.2021.

---
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Denis Gallant, certify that:



1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Smart-tek Solutions, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of

material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements

made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,

not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial

information included in this report, fairly present in all material

respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of

the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for

establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as

defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant

and have:



(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such

disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our

supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the

registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known

to us by others within those entities, particularly during the

period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls

and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about

the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of

the end of the period covered by this report based on such

evaluation; and



(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal

control over financial reporting that occurred during the

registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially

affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the

registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on

our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,

to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's

board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design

or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are

reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to

record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or

other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's

internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Denis Gallant

------------------------------

Denis Gallant

Chief Financial Officer



May 12, 2006
#### Dorothy O. ENGELS, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 68-636.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

May 21, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
# C_2022064EN.01001102.xml

| 7.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/11

---

Appeal brought on 1 October 2021 by Cora against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 20 July 2021 in Case T-500/19, Coravin v EUIPO — Cora (CORAVIN)

(Case C-619/21 P)

(2022/C 64/18)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Cora (represented by: M. Georges-Picot, avocate)

Other parties to the proceedings: Coravin, Inc. and European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

By order of 13 December 2021, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) ruled that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed.

---
#### PENNANT, INC., and Waterways Development Corporation, both Florida corporations, Appellants, v. HALGREEN, INC., and Ballance Homes, Inc., both Florida corporations, Appellees.

No. 73-353.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 11, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles MATHIS.

No. 60696.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

Paul J. Carmouche, Shreveport, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John A. Richardson, Dist. Atty., Ronald R. Inderbitzin, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

        Subsidiaries of Merchants and Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc.

The following bank subsidiaries are state banks and are organized under the laws
of the State of Wisconsin.

Lincoln State Bank
Grafton State Bank
Franklin State Bank
Community Bank of Oconto County
The Reedsburg Bank
Fortress Bank of Westby

The following bank subsidiary is a state bank and is organized under the laws of
the State of Iowa:

Fortress Bank of Cresco

The following bank subsidiary is a national bank and is organized under the laws
of the United States:

Fortress Bank, N.A.

The following non-bank subsidiaries are organized under the laws of the State of
Wisconsin:

CBG Financial Services, Inc.
Link Community Financial Services, LLC.
Keith C. Winters & Associates, LTD.
CBG Mortgage, Inc.
Fortress Mortgage Services Company
Lincoln Neighborhood Redevelopment Corporation
CBG Services, Inc.
Merchants Merger Corp.
Merchants New Merger Corp.

The following non-bank subsidiaries are organized under the laws of the State of
Nevada:

M&M Lincoln Investment Corporation
Westby Investment Company, Inc.
Reedsburg Investment Corp.
GSB Investments, Inc.
CBOC Investments, Inc.

All such subsidiaries are wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by Merchants and
Manufacturers Bancorporation, Inc.

                                       41