Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2021
                              Ann Marie Nelson, DAB CR5886 (2021)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Ann Marie Nelson, DAB CR5886 (2021)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Ann Marie Nelson,
(OI File No.: L-18-40102-9),
Petitioner,

v.

The Inspector General, Respondent.
Docket No. C-21-549Decision No. CR5886June 14, 2021

        
              
    

      DECISION

Respondent, the Inspector General (IG) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, excluded Petitioner, Ann Marie Nelson, from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and all other federal health care programs for five years pursuant to Section 1128(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (Act) (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(1)).  Petitioner challenges the exclusion before me.  For the reasons stated below, I conclude the IG had a basis for excluding her from program participation.  I affirm the IG's exclusion determination.

I.  Case Background and Procedural History

On February 26, 2021, the IG issued notice to Petitioner that she was being excluded from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs for five years.  IG Ex. 1.  The IG cited section 1128(a)(1) of the Act, which mandates exclusion when an individual is convicted of a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or a State health care program.  *Id.*  Petitioner timely sought review and I was designated to hear and decide this case.

I conducted a pre-hearing telephone conference on March 31, 2021, the substance of which is memorialized in my April 2, 2021 Order (Summary Order), and set forth a schedule for submission of arguments and evidence by the parties.  The IG submitted a

**Page 2**

brief (IG Br.) and six exhibits (IG Exs. 1-6), while Petitioner submitted a brief in three parts (P. Br.) and four exhibits (P. Exs. 1-4).

Neither party objected to the opposing party's proposed exhibits.  I therefore admit IG Exs. 1-6 and P. Exs. 1-4 into evidence.

II.  A Decision on the Record is Appropriate.

Neither party indicated a hearing was necessary in this matter.  P. Br. at 1; IG Br. at 5.  I therefore issue this decision based on the record before me.  Civ. Remedies Div. P. § 19(d).

III.  Issues

The issues in this case are limited to determining if the IG has a basis for excluding Petitioner from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and all other federal health care programs.  *See* 42 C.F.R. § 1001.2007(a)(1).

IV.  Jurisdiction

I have jurisdiction to hear and decide this case.  42 C.F.R. §§ 1001.2007(a)(1)-(2), 1005.2(a); *see also* 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(f)(1).

V. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Analysis1

***1. Petitioner was convicted of a criminal offense related to the delivery of a health care item or service under the Medicare program requiring exclusion under 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(1).***

The IG must exclude an individual from participation in federal health care programs if the individual was convicted of a criminal offense related to the delivery of a health care item or service under the Medicare program.  42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(1).  Here, Petitioner concedes she was convicted of an offense requiring exclusion.  P. Br. at 1.  Nevertheless, because the nature and circumstances of her offense of conviction are relevant to the outcome here, I note them for the record.

On December 23, 2019, Petitioner was charged by indictment in Yavapai County, Arizona with five criminal counts, including one count of Unsworn Falsification, a Class 2 misdemeanor, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 2704(A)(1), 13-707, and 13-802, committed on or about May 13, 2009.  IG Ex. 2 at 2, 5, 7-9, 11, 13-14.  Petitioner subsequently pleaded guilty to the Unsworn Falsification charge to resolve the criminal action against her.  IG

**Page 3**

Exs. 3 and 4.  At the change of plea hearing, Petitioner admitted that on or around May 13, 2009, she worked "for a physician, Dr. Ham . . . who [as part of his practice would] have his employees amend readings for vision so that the readings would be seen by, in some cases, a public servant – people who worked for Medicare, and approve the benefit of the payment whereas they might not have otherwise qualified . . ."  IG Ex. 6 at 9-10.

Petitioner admitted that on at least one occasion, she in fact amended patient vision readings to permit a claim for Medicare benefits to be made.  *Id.*  On August 28, 2020, the Yavapai County Superior Court of Arizona (state court) entered judgment against Petitioner and sentenced her to two months' unsupervised probation.  IG Ex. 5.  Petitioner fulfilled the terms of her probation and applied to have the judgment against her set aside and vacated.  DAB E-file Dkt. No. C-21-549, Doc. No. 3.  On December 9, 2020, the state court granted her application.  *Id.*

Though Petitioner concedes the nature of her conviction warrants exclusion, P. Br. at 2, I note for the record that the facts to which Petitioner admitted in open court clearly establish she was convicted of a criminal offense related to the delivery of a health care item or service under the Medicare program requiring exclusion under 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(1).  *See Travers v. Shalala*, 20 F.3d 993, 998 (9th Cir. 1994) (affirming conviction for filing fraudulent claims with the Medicaid program is "a program‐related offense" and "such financial misconduct is exactly what Congress sought to discourage" through imposing exclusions).

In her hearing request, Petitioner asserts that I should consider the fact that the state court ultimately set aside her conviction, which I take as an argument that she was therefore not truly convicted within the meaning of the Act.  P. Req. for Hearing.  However, the Act defines a person as "convicted" when "a judgment of conviction has been entered" by a court, regardless of whether that judgment is later "expunged."  42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(i)(1); *see also* 42 C.F.R. § 1001.2 (defining "convicted" to include judgments that are "expunged or otherwise removed").

As the IG correctly observed, the state court vacated its judgment against Petitioner pursuant to A.R.S. 13.905(A), an Arizona law which permits an individual convicted of a criminal offense to apply to have judgment of guilt set aside upon fulfillment of his or her sentence and conditions of probation.  IG Br. at 3; DAB E-file Dkt. No. C-21-549, Doc. No. 3.  This law specifies that even if a conviction is set aside, that conviction "may be . . . [u]sed as a conviction if the conviction would be admissible had it not been set aside."  A.R.S. § 13-905(E)(1).

Had the state court actually overturned Petitioner's conviction and returned her to a state of presumed innocence, her argument that the IG's exclusion action lacked foundation would be well taken.  But the state court's action here is clearly more akin to a post-conviction expungement, as contemplated by the Act.  The fact that the state court

**Page 4**

subsequently dismissed the criminal judgment against Petitioner upon successful completion of her term of probation does not matter; Petitioner remains "convicted" within the meaning of the Act.

***2. Petitioner must be excluded for a minimum of five years.***

Because I have concluded that a basis exists to exclude Petitioner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(1), she must be excluded for a minimum of five years.  42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(c)(3)(B).

VI. Conclusion

I affirm the IG's determination to exclude Petitioner from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and all other federal health care programs for a period of five years.


          /s/
        Bill Thomas

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. My findings of fact and conclusions of law appear as numbered headings in bold italic type. back to note 1 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back