alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022368EN.01000901.xml

| 26.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/9

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 June 2022 — Joëlle Mélin v European Parliament

(Case C-541/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Law governing the institutions - Implementing measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament - Article 33(1) and (2) - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Recovery of undue payments - Plea of illegality - Principle of legal certainty - Principle of protection of legitimate expectations - Assessment of the evidence - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

(2022/C 368/11)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Joëlle Mélin (represented by: F. Wagner, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and T. Lazian, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Ms Joëlle Mélin shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Joëlle Mélin shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 17.1.2022.

---
#### Sal VARRI, Appellant, v. F. H. WOODY and Lucille Woody, his wife, Appellees.

No. 69-577.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 8, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Betty GRAVITT et al., Appellants, v. The HERTZ CORPORATION et al., Appellees.

No. 71-1329.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 26, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 138 (Wednesday, July 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 33970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15306]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10465]


Town Hall Meeting on Modernizing the Columbia River Treaty Regime

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State (Department) will hold a Town Hall 
meeting in Portland, Oregon, to discuss the modernization of the 
Columbia River Treaty (CRT) regime.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 6, 2018, from 5:30 p.m. to 
approximately 7:00 p.m., Pacific Time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Bonneville Power 
Administration's Rates Hearing Room, 1201 Lloyd Blvd. Suite 200, 
Portland, OR 97232.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan May, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5714383b223a353e36053e21322503253236232e17242336233279303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86c5e9eaf3ebe4efe7d4eff0e3f4d2f4e3e7f2ffc6f5f2e7f2e3a8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>, 202-647-2170.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Town Hall is part of the Department's 
public engagement on the modernization of the CRT regime. The meeting 
is open to the public, up to the capacity of the room. Requests for 
reasonable accommodation should be made to the email listed above, on 
or before August 30, 2018. The Department will consider requests made 
after that date, but might not be able to accommodate them. Information 
regarding the proposed agenda, and other information about the meeting, 
can be found at https://www.state.gov/p/wha/ci/ca/topics/c78892.htm or 
by emailing the email address listed above. If you are unable to attend 
in person, you can listen to the Town Hall via phone by calling 1-888-
330-1716 and entering the passcode 19431467#.

Cynthia A. Kierscht,
Director, Office of Canadian Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2018-15306 Filed 7-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-29-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1205 Referred in House (RFH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 1205

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 1993

                Referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Fluid Milk Promotion Act of 1990 to define fluid milk 
  processors to exclude de minimis processors, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fluid Milk Promotion Amendments Act 
of 1993''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF FLUID MILK PROCESSOR.

    (a) Fluid Milk Processor.--Paragraph (4) of section 1999C of the 
Fluid Milk Promotion Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 6402(4)) is amended to read 
as follows:
            ``(4) Fluid milk processor.--The term `fluid milk 
        processor' means any person who processes and markets 
        commercially more than 500,000 pounds of fluid milk products in 
        consumer-type packages per month.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1999J(e) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 
6409(e)) is amended by inserting after ``4504(g))'' the following: ``, 
and that are fluid milk processors,''.

            Passed the Senate July 1 (legislative day, June 30), 1993.

            Attest:

                                             WALTER J. STEWART,

                                                             Secretary.
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WILLIE E. COBB

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 15

- 1711

[ March 23, 2016 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; Robert E. Belanger , Judge; L.T. Case No.

562009CF000718A

.

Willie E. Cobb, Avon Park, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard

Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Dismissed. See Godwin v. S tate, 593 So. 2d 211 (Fla

. 1992).

C IKLIN

, C.J., T

AYLOR and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### M., O. & R. R. Railroad Co. vs. Turrentine.

The decision in *M., O.*t$* *R. R. Railroad*Co. as. *Caster,*20 *Ark.*455, as t* notice oí assessments of stock under the charter of the company, approved.

*Appeal from Sevier Circuit Court.*

lion. Len B. Green, Circuit Judge.

Watkins & Gallagher, for the appellant.

*446Mr. Chief Justice English

delivered the opinion of the court.

The M., O. & R. R. R. R. Co. brought assumpsit against Turrentine for assessments ma.de upon shares taken by him in the capital stock of the company.

There were several counts in the declaration. The defendant interposed a demurrer to the first count, and pleaded the general issue to the others. The court sustained the demurrer, and the plaintiff rested. The issue to the other counts was submitted to the court, and, the plaintiff declining to introduce any evidence, judgment was rendered for defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.

The causes of demurrer do not appear in the record, and no counsel has appeared here for the appellee, to point out the supposed defects in the count demurred to. '

The clerk, in entering the judgment sustaining the demurrer, states that the court sustained the demurrer because in the averment of notice, to the appellee, of the assessments made upon his stock, the word *due*was not inserted before^the word *notice.*

The declaration alleges the date of each assessment, and avers the last one sued for to have been made 27th November, 1856, to be paid 1st March following. The suit was commenced 10th July, 1858.

After setting out the assessments upon the appellee’s stock, the time when made, the amount of each, when due and payable, the interest chargeable thereon, and the aggregate amount in arrear, notice is averred thus: *“*Of all which said assesssments, installments, or calls, at the county aforesaid, on the said day on which they were respectively made, as aforesaid, the said Charles P. Turrentine had notice, and w'as requested to pay the same.”

The averment of notice was sufficient, according to the decision in *M., O.*& *Red River Railroad Company vs. Gaster,*20 *Ark.*455.

Perceiving no other objection to the count that could be considered on a general demurrer, the judgment must be reversed’ *447and the cause remanded, with instructions to the court to overrule the demurrer to the first count of the declaration, and permit the appellee to answer over thereto.
# C_2022284EN.01006002.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/60

---

Order of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — NQ v Council and Others

(Case T-803/21) (1)

(2022/C 284/82)

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 109, 7.3.2022.

---
# C_2022119EN.01005901.xml

| 14.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/59

---

Order of the General Court of 27 January 2022 — About You v EUIPO — Safe 1 Immobilieninvest (Y/O/U), (Y/O/U YOUR ORIGINAL U) and (/Y/O/U YOUR ORIGINAL U)

(Joined Cases T-23/21, T-50/21 and T-51/21) (1)

(2022/C 119/84)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 8.3.2021.

---
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Denis Gallant, certify that:



1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Smart-tek Solutions, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of

material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements

made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,

not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial

information included in this report, fairly present in all material

respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of

the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for

establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as

defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant

and have:



(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such

disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our

supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the

registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known

to us by others within those entities, particularly during the

period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls

and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about

the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of

the end of the period covered by this report based on such

evaluation; and



(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal

control over financial reporting that occurred during the

registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth

quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially

affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the

registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on

our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,

to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's

board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design

or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are

reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to

record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or

other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's

internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Denis Gallant

------------------------------

Denis Gallant

Chief Financial Officer



November 13, 2006
# C_2022037EN.01003302.xml

| 24.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/33

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 November 2021 — VP v Cedefop

(Case T-534/21 R)

(Interim relief - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Application for interim measures - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 37/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: VP (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (represented by: T. Bontinck, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU for, first, suspension of the application of the act of Cedefop’s Executive Board to support the conclusion of its Executive Director that he re-establish the post of internal legal adviser and to initiate a selection procedure and for, second, an order to Cedefop that it keep vacant a temporary agent post at grade AD suitable for reinstating the applicant in the post of legal adviser.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
**EXHIBIT
32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**


**18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
connection with the Annual Report of Sierra Health Services, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc R.
Briggs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
Marc R. Briggs


Marc R.
Briggs


Chief
Financial Officer


April 30,
2007
Opinion issued August 13 , 202 4

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO S . 01 - 2 4 - 00 5 79 - C R 01 - 24 - 005 80 - CR 01 - 24 - 00581 - CR 01 - 24 - 00 582 - CR 01 - 24 - 00583 - CR

——————————— IN RE JESSER SANDOVAL , RELATOR

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator , Jesser Sandoval , has filed th ese petition s for writ of mandamus complaining that the trial court should appoint him a new defense attorney. 1

1 The underlying case s are The State of Texas v. J e sser Sandoval , cause number s 16 96530, 1696531, 1696532, 17 4 1419, and 1825559 , pending in the 232nd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Josh Hill , presiding.2

We deny the petition s for writ of mandamus. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly , Landau, and Rivas

- Molloy

. Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 477 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 477

To declare that July 12, 1994, be recognized as ``Kashmir World Action 
                                 Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 1994

  Mr. Burton of Indiana submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To declare that July 12, 1994, be recognized as ``Kashmir World Action 
                                 Day''.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) declares that on July 12, 1994, the world's news media, 
        governmental bodies, and citizens focus attention on the 
        continuous abuse of human rights perpetrated against the 
        Kashmiri people;
            (2) calls on all parties to the Kashmir dispute to abide by 
        international standards of human rights and humanitarian law 
        and cease extrajudicial killings, torture, and other human 
        rights violations;
            (3) calls on the Indian government to restore due process 
        of law and support the initiatives of independent and 
        nongovernmental organizations in monitoring against human 
        rights abuses; and
            (4) calls on the governments of both India and Pakistan to 
        recognize and respond to the call for self-determination, a 
        right which was historically promised but never exercised by 
        the people of Kashmir and to reactivate the role of the United 
        Nations as a catalyst in this process which would include full 
        participation of the Kashmiri people.
                                 <all>
```
# Region 9 | Pacific Rim

The Pacific Rim Region covers a vast and diverse territory that reaches from Window Rock, Arizona to Seoul, Korea.

# Region 9 | Pacific Rim

The Pacific Rim Region covers a vast and diverse territory that reaches from Window Rock, Arizona to Seoul, Korea.

##                     GSA Announces $100 Million Investment at Arizona’s San Luis I Land Port of Entry for Green Expansion as Part of President Biden’s Investing in America Agenda            

          The U.S. General Services Administration announced $98.9 million in Inflation Reduction Act funding for low-embodied carbon construction materials and emerging and sustainable technologies to incorporate into the San Luis I Land Port of Entry.    

##                     GSA hosts community stakeholder engagement meetings for LPOE projects in Calexico and San Luis            

          Regional GSA associates met with local and regional stakeholders in Calexico and San Luis to update them on the port modernization and expansion projects currently taking place in their communities.     

                    Buildings & Facilities            
The Pacific Rim Region manages 180 federal buildings and over 900 leases in:ArizonaCaliforniaHawaiiNevada

                    Products & Services            
Whatever your need, GSA can fulfill it. We've highlighted a few offerings: Assisted Acquisition ServicesCustomer ServiceEmergency ManagementReal Estate Account Management

 

                    About Region 9            
EventsJobsKey ContactsWelcome Message

                    Small Business Opportunities	            
We are advocates for small, small disadvantaged, veteran, service-disabled veteran-owned, HUBZone, and women business owners. 

                    Region 9 Newsroom            
For the MediaFeature StoriesPacific Rim Press ReleasesSocial and Other Media

 

                    Land Ports of Entry            
The Pacific Rim Region manages 14 land ports of entry along the U.S./Mexico border and has active projects at:Calexico West Land Port of EntryDouglas Commercial Land Port of EntryOtay Mesa Land Port of EntryRaul Hector Castro Land Port of EntrySan Luis I Land Port of EntrySan Ysidro Land Port of Entry

Print PageEmail Page

Top
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6578

JEROME HONEYMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FRANK DREW, Sheriff; DR. GONZALES; NURSE HANSON; NURSE HOLCOM; NURSE PLUMMER; MAJOR SMITH;

E. C. MORRIS; DAVID K. SMITH; CORRECTIONAL

OFFICER ZUMBRO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-583-R)

Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 10, 1996

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Honeyman, Appellant Pro Se. David Ernest Boelzner, WRIGHT,

ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia; Jeff Wayne Rosen,

ADLER, ROSEN & PETERS, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia; Alexander

Leonard Taylor, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Honeyman v. Drew, No. CA-95-583-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 26, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2021391EN.01001801.xml

| 27.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 391/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 391/18

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 July 2021 — CCPL and Others v Commission

(Case T-130/21 R)

(Interim relief - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Retail food packaging market - Decision imposing fines - Financial guarantee - 2006 Guidelines on the method for setting fines - Ability to pay - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No prima facie case)

(2021/C 391/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: CCPL — Consorzio Cooperative di Produzione e Lavoro SC (Reggio Emilia, Italy), Coopbox Group SpA (Bibbiano, Italy) and Coopbox Eastern s.r.o. (Nové Mesto nad Váhom, Slovakia) (represented by: E. Cucchiara and E. Rocchi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and T. Baumé, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2020) 8940 final of 17 December 2020 replacing the fines set by Commission Decision C(2015) 4336 final of 24 June 2015 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement to the extent that it concerns CCPL — Consorzio Cooperative di Produzione e Lavoro SC, Coopbox Group SpA and Coopbox Eastern s.r.o. (Case AT.39563 — Retail food packaging), in so far as it requires the applicants to provide a financial guarantee or to make provisional payment of the fines imposed.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---