alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Howard COKER, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. SPACE PAINTING, INC., Sun Art Decorators, Inc., Paul Smith Construction Company, General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Company, Michigan Mutual Liability, Self-Insured and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents, Cross-Petitioners.

No. 38362.

Supremo Court of Florida.

Sept. 24, 1969.

Irvin A. Meyers, of Meyers, Mooney & Langston, Orlando, for petitioner, cross-respondent.

Paul Bernardini, of Sands, Smalbein, Eu-bank, Johnson & Rosier, Daytona Beach, for Space Painting, Inc.

C. E. Miller, of Wieland & Miller, Orlando, for Paul Smith Construction Co.

Heskin A. Whittaker, of Whittaker, Pyle & Wood, Orlando, for Sun Art Decorators, Inc. and Michigan Mutual Liability Company, respondents, cross-petitioners.

Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondent.

PER CURIAM.

By petition and two cross-petitions for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 4, 1969. Our consideration of the petitions, the records and briefs, and oral argument having been heard, leads us to conclude that the petition and cross-petitions for certiorari should be and they are hereby denied.

Attorney’s fee in the amount of $200.00 is awarded to claimant’s attorney for filing briefs in opposition to the cross-petitions.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Alfred THOMAS, Jr.

No. 53999.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 11, 1973.

In re: Alfred Thomas, Jr. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order.

Granted. See Order

On considering the petition of relator in the above entitled and numbered cause,

Ordered that proceedings are stayed for a period of thirty (30) days to permit the State of Mississippi to furnish a statement of facts and an amplified affidavit showing probable cause.
#### MINI-SUN ART, INC., a Florida corporation, Relator, v. The JUDGES OF the COUNTY COURT OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, Respondents.

No. 73-450.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 29, 1973.

Prohibition dismissed.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1168

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain deductions of school bus drivers shall be allowable in computing adjusted

gross income.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 29 (legislative day, JUNE 22), 1993

Mr. JOHNSTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that certain deductions of school bus drivers shall be

allowable in computing adjusted gross income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTIONS OF SCHOOL BUS DRIVERS AL4 LOWABLE IN COMPUTING ADJUSTED GROSS

5 INCOME.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 62(a) of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain

8 trade and business deductions of employees) is amended
2

•S 1168 IS

1 by adding at the end thereof the following new subpara2 graph:

3 ‘‘(C) CERTAIN EXPENSES OF SCHOOL BUS

4 DRIVERS.—The deductions allowed by part VI

5 (section 161 and following) which consist of ex6 penses paid or incurred by the taxpayer in con7 nection with the performance by the taxpayer of

8 services as an employee while driving a school

9 bus (as defined in section 4221(d)(7)(C)).’’

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

12 December 31, 1992.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Whitemark Homes, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

      Date: November 22, 2004
                                       /s/ Kenneth White
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Kenneth White
                                       Chief Executive Officer

      Date: November 22, 2004
                                       /s/ Russ Christensen
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Russ Christensen
                                       Acting Principal Financial Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Whitemark Homes,
Inc. and will be retained by Whitemark Homes, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### ST. MORITZ HOTEL, Petitioner, v. Jimmy C. DAUGHTRY and the Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 41616.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 30, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           29995
<SECURITIES>                                       328
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2515
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (3)
<INVENTORY>                                        165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 36638
<PP&E>                                            3743
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1993)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   42129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            26557
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            68
<OTHER-SE>                                       15333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     42128
<SALES>                                           1982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1982
<CGS>                                             4029
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (54)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1993)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       615
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1378)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1378)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 425

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit voting

by proxy in committees and subcommittees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1994

Mr. GOODLATTE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

prohibit voting by proxy in committees and subcommittees.

1 Resolved, That clause 2(f) of rule XI of the Rules of

2 the House of Representatives is amended to read as fol3 lows:

4 ‘‘(f) No vote by any member of any committee or sub5 committee with respect to any measure or matter may be

6 cast by proxy.’’.

Æ
H. Res. 487

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

July 21, 1994.

Resolved, That the bill of the Senate (S. 1030) entitled

the ‘‘Veterans Health Programs Improvement Act of 1994’’,

in the opinion of this House, contravenes the first clause of

the seventh section of the first article of the Constitution of

the United States and is an infringement of the privileges of

this House and that such bill be respectfully returned to the

Senate with a message communicating this resolution.

Attest:

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-71-2018]

On May 9, 2018, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Port of Long Beach, grantee of FTZ 50, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 50, on behalf of VF Outdoor, LLC, in Ontario, Santa Fe Springs and Corona, California.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (83 FR 22441, May 15, 2018). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 50R was approved on July 10, 2018, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 50's 2,000-acre activation limit.                

Dated: July 10, 2018.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-15113 Filed 7-13-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
CERTIFICATION

I, Tami J Story, Acting Chief Financial Officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc.,
certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Earth Search
Sciences, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

          (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: July 12, 2005
                               ----------------------------------
                               Tami J Story
                               Acting Chief Financial Officer
                               (Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2020201EN.01004001.xml

| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/40

---

Action brought on 10 April 2020 — Chanel v EUIPO — Innovative Cosmetic Concepts (INCOCO)

(Case T-196/20)

(2020/C 201/53)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Chanel (Neuilly sur-Seine, France) (represented by: J. Passa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Innovative Cosmetic Concepts LLC (Clifton, New Jersey, United States of America)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark INCOCO — International registration designating the European Union No 1 189 828

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 January 2020 in Case R 194/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the principle of good administration. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principle of good administration.

---
#### WOMENS SERVICES, P.C., a Nebraska Professional Corporation; G. William Orr, M.D. and Raymond L. Schulte, M.D., Appellees, v. Paul L. DOUGLAS, Attorney General for the State of Nebraska and Donald L. Knowles, County Attorney for the County of Douglas, State of Nebraska, Appellants. Raymond L. SCHULTE, M.D., Appellee, v. Paul L. DOUGLAS, Attorney General for the State of Nebraska and Donald L. Knowles, County Attorney for the County of Douglas, State of Nebraska, Appellants. Marvin L. DIETRICH, M.D., Appellee, v. Paul L. DOUGLAS, Attorney General of the State of Nebraska and Donald L. Knowles, County Attorney for the County of Douglas, Nebraska, Appellants.

No. 82-2292.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 19, 1983.

Decided June 28, 1983.

Frank Susman, Roselee Adlin, Susman, Schermer, Rimmel & Parker, St. Louis, Mo., Lawrence I. Batt, Garber & Batt, Michael T. Levy, Levy & Lazer, P.C., Omaha, Neb., for appellees.

Robert C. Sigler, Omaha, Neb., for appellants.

Before ROSS, ARNOLD and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Womens Services filed this action on March 30, 1981, challenging the constitutionality of certain sections of the Nebraska criminal code regulating abortion. Neb. Rev.Stat. §§ 28-326(6), 329, 330 and 331 (1981). The district court1 originally dismissed the case on abstention grounds on March 26, 1981. This court reversed and remanded for trial. *Womens Services P.C. v. Douglas,*653 F.2d 355 (8th Cir.1981).

On July 30, 1981, the district court ruled that the above-cited sections were facially unconstitutional. The court awarded plaintiffs attorney fees totalling $29,936.10. Defendants appeal the judgment of the district court finding the statutes unconstitutional and also appeal the award of attorney fees.

*466Upon a careful review of the record and briefs of the parties in this case we conclude that the judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact which are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. Further, we find no abuse of discretion in the award of attorney fees. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of Judge Urbom’s memoranda and order. *See*8th Cir. R. 14.

1

. The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Latif M. Nathani, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Preferred Voice, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b. evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):



a. all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
and



b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Latif M. Nathani         
|Latif M. Nathani             
|Chairman and CEO             
|(Principal Executive Officer)
|August 16, 2004
H. Res. 542

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

September 26, 1994.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4008) to authorize appropriations for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for fiscal

years 1994 and 1995, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order

against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate

shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour,

with thirty minutes equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Merchant Marine and Fisheries and thirty minutes equally

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. After general debate the bill shall be considered for

amendment under the five-minute rule. In lieu of the committee amendments now printed in the bill, it shall be in order
2

HRES 542 EH

to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment

under the five-minute rule an amendment in the nature of a

substitute consisting of the text of H.R. 5046. That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered by title

rather than by section. Each title shall be considered as read.

All points of order against that amendment in the nature of

a substitute are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of

a substitute made in order as original text. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.