alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023223EN.01002101.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 May 2023 — Bastion Holding and Others v Commission

(Case T-289/21) (1)

(State aid - Measures to support enterprises in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Netherlands - Decision not to raise any objections - Temporary framework for State aid measures - Obligation to state reasons)

(2023/C 223/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Bastion Holding BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands), and the 35 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: B. Braeken, X.Y.G. Versteeg, T. Hieselaar and L. Elzas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and M. Farley, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: J. Langer and M. Bulterman, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission decision C(2021) 1872 final of 15 March 2021 on State Aid SA.62241 (2021/N) — The Netherlands — Third amendment of the direct grant scheme to support the fixed costs for enterprises affected by the COVID-19 outbreak.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bastion Holding BV and the other applicant parties whose names are listed in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bastion Holding BV and the other applicant parties whose names are listed in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 278, 12.7.2021.

---
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Virco
Mfg. Corporation (the "Company"), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

         -        the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period
                  ended January 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements
                  of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         -        the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operation of the Company.

Dated:  April 25, 2003

/s/ Robert A. Virtue
--------------------
    Robert A. Virtue
    President

/s/  Robert E. Dose
-------------------
Robert E. Dose
Vice President--Finance
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambassadors International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Joseph J. Ueberroth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Joseph J. Ueberroth
|Joseph J. Ueberroth    
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 7, 2006         

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350
and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
263 La. 108

#### Gerald D. NORRIS v. STATE of Louisiana et al.

No. 52878.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 19, 1972.

In re-: Gerald D. Norris applying for writ of mandamus.

Application denied. The return of the District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans shows that he will endeavor to secure the return of Applicant to Louisiana for trial.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a) AND UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Joseph J. Ueberroth, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ambassadors
International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. November 5, 2004/s/ Joseph J. UeberrothJoseph
J. UeberrothPresident andChief Executive Officer
-  News 
-  Blog 
-  HHS Live 
-  Podcasts 
-  Media Guidelines for HHS Employees 

                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 25, 2023**

**Contact:                            HHS Press Office               202-690-6343media@hhs.gov**

# Statement from HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra on Missouri’s Emergency Regulation Restricting Access to Gender-Affirming Care

“At a time when our communities are facing true threats to their health and well-being – in the form of natural disasters, gun violence, and simply putting food on the table – some states and their elected officials have chosen to not focus on these issues but rather on a crisis of their own manufacturing.

“To date, we have seen at least a dozen states take steps to restrict access to gender-affirming treatment, primarily targeting trans youth, their families and caretakers, and their health care providers. These actions strip parents and guardians of their ability to make the most intimate of decisions and interfere with the independent medical judgement of health care providers. Most tragically, these actions send a message to our trans, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming youth that partisan politics matters more than their mental or physical health.

“The Emergency Regulation issued by the Attorney General of Missouri on April 13, 2023, is an egregious attack on the bodily autonomy of transgender people and an unconscionable interference with the practice of medicine by dedicated and trained professionals.

“We must not lose sight of the humanity of the people impacted by these laws. We will continue to fight on behalf of all Americans to ensure they have access to the care and support they need.”

https://www.hhs.gov/newsHHS on Facebook@HHSgovHHS Email UpdatesApril 25, 2023

## Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases

Sign Up

## Subscribe to RSS

Receive latest updates

## Related News Releases

                          -  OASH Health Equity Fact Sheet 
                          -  OCR Health Equity Factsheet 
                          -  HHS Crisis Resources for Oklahoma 

## Related Blog Posts

                          -    Commemorating the Olmstead Anniversary with Revitalized Enforcement Initiative 

## Media Inquiries

For general media inquiries, please contact media@hhs.gov.

Content last reviewed April 25, 2023
# C_2022064EN.01001601.xml

| 7.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 9 November 2021 — BA v Finanzamt X

(Case C-670/21)

(2022/C 64/25)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: BA

Defendant: Finanzamt X

Question referred

Are Articles 63(1), 64 and 65 TFEU to be interpreted as precluding national legislation of a Member State on the levying of inheritance tax which, for the purposes of calculating inheritance tax, provides that developed immovable property forming part of personal assets which is located in a third country (in this case: Canada) and is let for residential purposes is to be taken into account at its full value, whereas immovable property forming part of personal assets which is located within the national territory, in a Member State of the European Union or in a State of the European Economic Area and is let for residential purposes is to be taken into account at only 90 % of its value in the calculation of inheritance tax?

---
EXHIBIT 23
                                                                      ----------

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of Western Power & Equipment Corp. of our report dated
October 15, 2002 relating to the financial statements and the financial
schedules which appear in this Form 10-K/A2.



MOSS ADAMS LLP

Beaverton, Oregon
November 27, 2002

<PAGE>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of Western Power & Equipment Corp. of our report dated
October 6, 2001 relating to the financial statements and the financial schedules
which appear in this Form 10-K/A2.



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Portland, Oregon
November 27, 2002
#### HENRY GIBBONS, Jr. *vs.*PARK MASON.

Constable’s return must show whether the service was personal, or by leaving a copy at delt.’s house.

It need not state all the requisites, but if it shows that any of them were not observed, it will be bad.

Service by leaving a copy at the deft.’s *office*is not a good service.

Certiorari.

Summons issued. Constable returns—“Summoned by copy left at the deft.’s office.” Judgment by default, the constable having verified the service by making oath “that he did duly serve this warrant in the manner set forth in the note of service indorsed.” Exception. That the service of the summons was not made according to law.

*Richard H. Bayard,*for plff.

*Non constat*that the office is not a part of the deft.’s house, and the constable having sworn that he *duly*served the process, it will be taken to be so, unless the contrary appear. If the office be distinct from the deft.’s place of abode, it should be shown by the other side. All the requisites of the service need not be stated in the return. “Service by copy” would be *453a good return, because it would be construed to mean that the service was by leaving a copy at the deft.’s place of abode in the presence of one or more of the family or neighbors, as the law directs. *Big.*331.5.3.'

*Hamilton.*

The law requires a service at the dwelling-house in a certain manner. This return shows a different service; a service at the office. The oath does not help the case, because it is merely that the service was duly made *in the manner indorsed.*

*JR. H. Bayard,*for plaintiff.

*Hamilton,*for defendant.

*The Court.*

The act requires that notice should be left at the dwelling-house of the deft, in the presence of some member of his family or neighbors. It is a wise provision to insure notice to the party before a judgment by default shall bind him. Here the service was at an office, a place where the family do not usually reside. The constable need not state in his'return that all the requisites to a legal service were observed; but if he states any thing which shows that the service was not regular, the judgment cannot be sustained.

Judgment reversed.
#### Johnnie JOHNSON et al. v. John P. OWEN, New Orleans Public Service, Inc., et al.

No. 62552.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 15, 1978.

In re: Mrs. Carrie Nelson Fernandez, Individually and as Testamentary Executrix of the Succession of Rebecca Davis, widow of Frank Schief, Jr., et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans # 8501. 359 So .2d 272.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### Fred DAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-33.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 20, 1970.

W. Paul Thompson, De Funiak Springs, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., John A. Zebedee, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Hunt v. State, 200 So.2d 212 (Fla.App.1967).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINGTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
-  News 
-  Blog 
-  HHS Live 
-  Podcasts 
-  Media Guidelines for HHS Employees 

                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 11, 2023**

**Contact:                            HHS Press Office               202-690-6343media@hhs.gov**

# HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra Statement on End of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency

Today, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra released the following statement on the end of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE):

"Thanks to the Biden-Harris Administration's whole-of-government approach to combatting COVID-19, our country is in a better place than at any point during the pandemic.

"We have learned many lessons during the last two and a half years and have worked to strengthen our preparedness and response efforts by creating resiliency in the domestic supply chain, building capacity to ensure adequate stockpiles, and fostering innovation through projects like Project NextGen.

"HHS and the leadership across the Department remain focused on protecting the health and well-being of all Americans, particularly those at highest at risk, including seniors and immunocompromised people, making sure we don’t leave the uninsured behind and monitoring the latest subvariants so we're prepared and ready to manage the risks of the virus moving forward. The PHE is ending, but COVID-19 remains a public health priority, and our work to protect the American public will continue."

https://www.hhs.gov/newsHHS on Facebook@HHSgovHHS Email UpdatesMay 11, 2023

## Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases

Sign Up

## Subscribe to RSS

Receive latest updates

## Related News Releases

                          -  HHS, DHS, and FEMA Announce Completion of Multi-Year Review of State Efforts to Provide Language Access During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency 
                          -  Readout of HHS Secretary Becerra’s Meeting with Pharmacy CEOs on COVID-19 Therapeutics Commercialization 
                          -  Readout of HHS Meeting with Health Care Providers on COVID-19 Therapeutics Commercialization 

## Related Blog Posts

                          -    Calling innovators! HHS Long COVID Healthathon launches with $25K in prizes 
                          -    Reflections from the Deputy Director of the HHS Office of Long COVID Research and Practice 
                          -    Driving Long COVID Innovation with Health+ Human-Centered Design 

## Media Inquiries

For general media inquiries, please contact media@hhs.gov.

Content last reviewed May 11, 2023
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1993
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1993
<CASH>                                          44,973
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,111,584
<ALLOWANCES>                                    68,644
<INVENTORY>                                  6,164,147
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,114,947
<PP&E>                                       5,399,546
<DEPRECIATION>                                 647,878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,883,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,638,962
<BONDS>                                        247,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     207,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,883,163
<SALES>                                     11,406,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,406,491
<CGS>                                        8,797,053
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,516,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,723
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,254,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,116,447)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (442,758)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (673,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                    (826,165)
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,499,854)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-33013,  No. 33-33063,  No. 33-65157,  No. 33-68860 and No. 333-49837 on Forms
S-8 and  Registration  Statement No.  33-45815 on Form S-3 of Network  Equipment
Technologies,   Inc.  of  our  reports  dated  April  15,  1998,  appearing  and
incorporated  by  reference  in  this  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K of  Network
Equipment Technologies, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 1998.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
June 24, 1998
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Douglas COODY.

No. 54001.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 4, 1973.

In re: Douglas Coody applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order.

Writ denied. Insufficient showing to warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction at this time. Adequate remedy is afforded relator in the event of conviction.