alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 421 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 155

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 421

                          [Report No. 103-502]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (S. 2000) to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 1995 
through 1998 to carry out the Head Start Act and the Community Services 
                Block Grant Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 11, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                 House Calendar No. 155
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 421

                          [Report No. 103-502]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (S. 2000) to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 1995 
through 1998 to carry out the Head Start Act and the Community Services 
                Block Grant Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 1994

 Mr. Hall of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (S. 2000) to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 1995 
through 1998 to carry out the Head Start Act and the Community Services 
                Block Grant Act, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (S. 2000) to authorize 
appropriations for fiscal years 1995 through 1998 to carry out the Head Start 
Act and the Community Services Block Grant Act, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are 
waived.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Steven B. Solomon certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of CT Holdings Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of CT Holdings Enterprises, Inc.


/s/ STEVEN B. SOLOMON
---------------------
Steven B. Solomon
President and Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2007


I, Richard Connelly certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of CT Holdings Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of CT Holdings Enterprises, Inc.


/s/ RICHARD CONNELLY
--------------------
Richard Connelly
Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1168 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1168

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain 
   deductions of school bus drivers shall be allowable in computing 
                         adjusted gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 29 (legislative day, June 22), 1993

 Mr. Johnston introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain 
   deductions of school bus drivers shall be allowable in computing 
                         adjusted gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEDUCTIONS OF SCHOOL BUS DRIVERS ALLOWABLE IN COMPUTING 
              ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 62(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain trade and business deductions 
of employees) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Certain expenses of school bus drivers.--The 
                deductions allowed by part VI (section 161 and 
                following) which consist of expenses paid or incurred 
                by the taxpayer in connection with the performance by 
                the taxpayer of services as an employee while driving a 
                school bus (as defined in section 4221(d)(7)(C)).''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1992.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 10.2** **GERBER    SCIENTIFIC, INC.** **2006 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN**

 
**Contents**          Article 1.     Establishment, Purpose, and    Duration     1           Article 2.     Definitions     1           Article 3.     Administration     4           Article 4.     Shares Subject to This Plan    and Maximum Awards     5           Article 5.     Eligibility and Participation     6           Article 6.     Stock Options     7           Article 7.     Stock Appreciation Rights     8           Article 8.     Restricted Stock and Restricted    Stock Units     9           Article 9.     Performance Units/Performance    Shares     10           Article 10.     Cash-Based Awards and Other    Stock-Based Awards     11           Article 11.     Transferability of Awards     12           Article 12.     Performance Measures     12           Article 13.     Nonemployee Director Awards     13           Article 14.     Dividend Equivalents     13           Article 15.     Beneficiary Designation     14           Article 16.     Rights of Participants     14           Article 17.     Change in Control     14           Article 18.     Effective Date, Amendment,    Modification, Suspension, and Termination     15           Article 19.     Withholding     15           Article 20.     Successors     16           Article 21.     General Provisions     16    

 
**Article 1.**
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the second quarter ended November 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Patty Townsend, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   August 26, 2004


/s/ Patty Townsend
------------------
Patty Townsend
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                       23
#### Joseph and Sylvia BERTRAND v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO.

No. 62033.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 5, 1978.

In re: Joseph and Sylvia Bertrand, applying for writs of certiorari. Parish of St. Charles.

Writ denied.
Exhibit 15.1





Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Israel Chemicals Ltd:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-205518) on Form S-8 of Israel Chemicals Ltd.
(“the Company”) of our report dated March 14, 2017, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position
of the Company as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes
in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, which report appears in the December 31, 2016 annual report on Form
20-F of the Company.



/s/ Somekh Chaikin



Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants (Israel)
Member Firm of KPMG International
Tel Aviv, Israel
March 14, 2017
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: Project No.: 0172.08.005.607 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: 2011 Prelim Cat Rev 

### CBI? Yes No TELEPHONE CALL RECORD Incoming Outgoing Date: 09/13/11 Time: 2:10 am pm

Company Name: Arcelormittal Weirton ERG Staff Name: Kimberly Landick

Contact Name: Dave Minda Contact Phone Number: (304) 797-2288 General Subject: 2009 DMR Chromium Discharges



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On September 13, 2011 at 2:10pm I called Dave Minda and asked about the 2009 DMR chromium discharges. He confirmed the following discharges:

Outfall 203 Jan 2009 135,000 ug/L or 135 mg/L Dec 2009 83 ug/L Jan 2010 68200 ug/L Feb 2010 93 ug/L Outfall 003 Jan 2009 0.08 mg/L

He also stated the following NPDES permit limits:

Outfall 203 Chromium Monitor Only Outfall 003 Chromium Daily Max: 2.05 mg/L, Monthly Avg: 0.81 mg/L Fluoride Monitor Only

Mr. Minda stated that outfall 203 is an internal outfall to outf all 003. There are some treatment steps at outfall 203 but if more treatment is necessary, it is done at outfall 003. Mr. Minda stated that he is confident in the lab results but would contact them if needed. He said that ferric chloride is used to reduce chromium concentrations in their wastewater. I thanked Mr. Minda for his tim e and told him I’d call back with any questions.
#### Senja WIRTA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, Individually and as Trustee for Mary Weaver Krapish and Louis M. Ream; and Rober C. Ream, Individually and as Trustee for Louis M. Ream, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 278.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 15, 1937.

J. Alfred Anderson, of New York City, for appellant.

Sage, Gray, Todd & Sims, of New York City (Melber Chambers and Edward H. Spencer, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.
#### Fred J. Fuller, Respondent, *v.*The Queens Land and Title Co., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

March, 1913.)

Counterclaim—pleading — action on promissory note — insufficiency of.

In an action on a promissory note against the maker allegations of plaintiff’s breach of an agreement to operate a certain hotel rented of defendant for a term at the agreed rental of ten per cent, of all gross receipts by plaintiff, pleaded as a counterclaim, .states a cause of action, and a judgment entered on a verdict directed for plaintiff on the ground that the counterclaim is insufficient in law upon its face will he reversed.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, entered in favor of the plaintiff upon a verdict directed by the court.

Arthur B. La Far, for appellant.

Stephen M. Hoye (Albert E. Richardson, of counsel), for respondent.

Seabury, J.

The complaint sets forth a cause of action upon two promissory notes. The answer pleaded a counte r-*618claim. Upon the trial the court held that the counterclaim was insufficient in law on the face thereof, and directed a verdict for the plaintiff. The counterclaim alleged that plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement, whereby plaintiff rented a certain hotel to the defendant for the term commencing Hay 15, 1912, and ending November 1, .1912, and that the plaintiff agreed to operate said hotel during that term “ at the agreed rental of ten per cent of all gross receipts received by said plaintiff in the operation of said hotel.” The counterclaim also set forth the breach of this agreement, and that, by reason of the breach, the defendant sustained damage. These allegations state a cause of action. It is sought to defend the ruling made below on the ground that the counterclaim contained no allegation that gross receipts were realized from the operation of the hotel. How could there be any receipts if the plaintiff refused, in violation, of his contract, to operate the hotel? It was this refusal on the part of the plaintiff which constitúted a breach of contract on his part. For this breach the defendant was entitled to recover damages. Whether or not the defendant could have established his damage by competent proof, we are not now in a position to determine. We cannot determine from an inspection of the pleadings that the defendant was unable to prove the damages resulting from the plaintiff’s breach of contract. The counterclaim stated a cause of action, and should not have been summarily disposed of by a motion upon the pleadings.

Gerard and Bijur, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
#### James J. REEVES, Appellant, v. UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Inc., a corporation, Appellee.

No. O-439.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 1972.

Edward T. Barfield, of Hahn, Reeves & Barfield, Pensacola, for appellant.

Antony E. Fiorentino, Pensacola, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a final judgment in a garnishment proceeding in favor of plaintiff-appellee.

Our examination of the record and consideration of the briefs and oral arguments submitted by the parties indicate that no reversible error was committed in arriving at the judgment herein appealed.

Said judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 448

Amending the Code of Official Conduct of the Rules of the House of Representatives to require the temporary step aside of a chairman or ranking

minority party member who is indicted.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1994

Mr. REYNOLDS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Standards of Official Conduct

RESOLUTION

Amending the Code of Official Conduct of the Rules of

the House of Representatives to require the temporary

step aside of a chairman or ranking minority party member who is indicted.

1 Resolved, That (a) rule XLIII of the Rules of the

2 House of Representatives is amended by inserting after

3 clause 12 the following new clause:

4 ‘‘13. The chairman or ranking minority party mem5 ber of a standing, select, or special committee of the

6 House or of a joint committee of the Congress, or any

7 subcommittee thereof, who is indicted for a felony for

8 which a sentence of two or more years imprisonment may
2

•HRES 448 IH

1 be imposed, shall cease to exercise the powers of chairman

2 or ranking minority party member, as the case may be,

3 and shall step aside in favor of the next ranking member

4 of the committee or subcommittee who shall serve as act5 ing chairman or acting ranking minority party member,

6 as the case may be, unless or until the charges are dis7 missed or reduced to less than a felony for which a sen8 tence of two or more years imprisonment may be im9 posed.’’.

10 (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall

11 apply to any individual who is chairman or ranking minor12 ity party member of a standing, select, or special commit13 tee of the House or of a joint committee of the Congress,

14 or any subcommittee thereof, who is indicted for a felony

15 described in that amendment or is under indictment for

16 such a felony on the date this resolution is agreed to.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 26, 2014

h1119

Order 

Clerk

November 26, 2014

149509 & (10)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149509

COA: 320360

Marquette CC: 12-050758-FC

AXEL GABRIEL ACEVEDO,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2014 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is 

DENIED.
#### Carl BOSTIC, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 7654.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 4, 1937.

W. B. Bartels, of Columbus, Ohio, for appellant.

Francis C. Canny, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for the United States.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that the appeal in this cause has been abandoned, it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is, docketed and dismissed, the costs to be charged against the government as constructive earnings.
# C_2021513EN.01002901.xml

| 20.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 513/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 513/29

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2021 — Troy Chemical Company and Troy v Commission

(Case T-297/21 R)

(Interim measures - Biocidal products - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/348 - Approval of carbendazim as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 7 (film preservatives) and 10 (masonry preservatives) - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)

(2021/C 513/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Troy Chemical Company BV (Delft, Netherlands), Troy Corp. (Florham Park, New Jersey, United States) (represented by: D. Abrahams, H. Widemann and L. Gorywoda, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lindenthal and M. Farley, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, first, suspension of operation of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/348 of 25 February 2021 approving carbendazim as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 7 and 10 (OJ 2021 L 68, p. 174), and, second, the grant of any other interim measures which the General Court considers appropriate.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ViroPharma Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michel de Rosen                                                      
|Michel de Rosen                                                          
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors
|November 8, 2005                                                         
|                                                                         
|/s/ Vincent J. Milano                                                    
|Vincent J. Milano                                                        
|Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer                    
|November 8, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CELERIS CORPORATION DATED SEPTEMBER 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,372,260
<SECURITIES>                                 3,051,643
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,964,766
<ALLOWANCES>                                   287,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,794,014
<PP&E>                                       1,338,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,132,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,719,440
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,923
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,381,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,132,064
<SALES>                                      6,632,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,632,149
<CGS>                                        4,504,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,706,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,155,268)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,155,268)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 475,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,680,268)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.86)


</TABLE>