alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 473 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 473

To raise awareness about domestic violence against women in the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 1994

Mr. Manton (for himself, Mr. Pallone, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Owens, and 
 Mr. Meehan) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To raise awareness about domestic violence against women in the United 
                                States.

Whereas men must start talking to men about ending the violence against women, 
        and start teaching their sons that the physical, sexual, emotional, or 
        financial abuse of women will not be tolerated by our society;
Whereas corporate America must speak up and use its vast resources to increase 
        awareness about domestic violence, as they have done successfully 
        through national campaigns against substance abuse and child abuse;
Whereas the Center for Disease Control reports that domestic violence is the 
        leading cause of injury for women between the ages of 15 and 44, more 
        than car accidents, rapes, and muggings combined;
Whereas approximately 29 percent of all female murder victims in 1992 were 
        killed by their husbands or boyfriends;
Whereas 25 percent of women treated in hospital emergency rooms are there as a 
        result of domestic violence;
Whereas 2,500,000 women are victimized each year, and 1 out of every 3 women 
        killed dies as a result of domestic battery;
Whereas the American Medical Association estimates that 25 percent of all women 
        in the United States will be abused by a current or former partner some 
        time during their lives;
Whereas every 15 seconds a woman is battered in a domestic dispute; and
Whereas every 6 hours a woman dies in the United States as a result of domestic 
        violence: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
there is a need for a national campaign to heighten awareness about 
domestic battery, and to end the silence that surrounds this type of 
violence.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-60012

Summary Calendar

EDGAR ERNESTO MARTINEZ-DE LEON,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A098 592 670

Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

An in absentia order of removal was entered by the Immigration Judge on

June 28, 2005, requiring the removal of Edgar Ernesto Martinez-De Leon

(Martinez) to El Salvador. On December 23, 2009, Martinez moved to reopen the

removal proceedings so that he could apply for asylum. The BIA dismissed the

motion to reopen as untimely filed. Martinez has petitioned this court for review

of the BIA’s decision. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 11, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-60012 Document: 00511663386 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/11/2011
No. 11-60012

Martinez contends that the BIA abused its discretion by refusing to reopen

his removal proceedings because he was never properly served with Notice to

Appear (NTA). The BIA found that Martinez was personally served with an

NTA on March 30, 2005, which set forth the date and time of his hearing. The

NTA bears Martinez’s signature and fingerprint; it explained the consequences

of failing to appear, and it indicated that Martinez was advised orally in Spanish

of the time and place of his hearing and the consequences of failing to appear. 

The hearing was held on the date set forth in the NTA, but Martinez did not

appear.

The BIA concluded thatMartinez was properly notified of the immigration

hearing. This finding is supported by substantial evidence. See Kohwarien v.

Holder, 635 F.3d 174, 178 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez raises no argument with

respect to the BIA’s conclusion that he had failed to make any showing of

changed circumstances in El Salvador. Issues not raised in an alien’s petition

for review of a decision by the BIA are deemed abandoned. Soadjede v. Ashcroft,

324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003). 

Martinez’s remaining arguments go to the BIA’s alternative holding that

he had made an inadequate showing that he is entitled to asylum and

withholding of removal; he contends also that the BIA failed to explain

adequately its reasons for denying relief. The BIA’s reasons provided an

adequate basis for this court’s review. See Hernandez-Cordero v. USINS, 819

F.2d 558, 563 (5th Cir. 1987) (en banc). Because Martinez has not shown that

the BIA abused its discretion in determining that his motion to reopen was

untimely, we have not considered whether the BIA abused its discretion in

determining that Martinez had not made a prima facie showing of eligibility for

asylum or withholding of removal. See Choudhury v. Holder, 418 F. App’x 318,

320 (5th Cir. 2011)(unpublished). The petition for review is DENIED. 

2

Case: 11-60012 Document: 00511663386 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/11/2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             421
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                       939
<INVENTORY>                                     17,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,833
<PP&E>                                          66,604
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,296
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,305
<SALES>                                        189,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               189,465
<CGS>                                          129,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   173
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,570
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,507
<INCOME-TAX>                                       200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,307
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,307
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16




</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                   Exhibit 11


                      THE NEWHALL LAND AND FARMING COMPANY

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER UNIT
                         (in thousands, except per unit)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Years Ended December 31,
                                                                ---------------------------------------
 Partnership Units                                                 1997          1996           1995
                                                                 -------        -------        -------
<S>                                                              <C>            <C>            <C>   
   Average number of units outstanding during the period          34,520         35,292         36,241
   Net units issuable in connection with dilutive
   options based upon use of the treasury stock method               230            119             31
                                                                 -------        -------        -------
   Average number of primary units                                34,750         35,411         36,272
                                                                 =======        =======        =======
 Net income                                                      $44,493        $41,889        $27,317
                                                                 =======        =======        =======
 Net income per unit                                             $  1.29        $  1.19        $   .75
                                                                 =======        =======        =======
 Net income per unit - assuming dilution                         $  1.28        $  1.18        $   .75
                                                                 =======        =======        =======
</TABLE>
IV

House Calendar No. 225

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 547

[Report No. 103–749]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 4602) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 26, 1994

Mr. GORDON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 4602) making appropriations

for the Department of the Interior and related agencies

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for

other purposes.

1 Resolved, That all points of order against the con2 ference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4602) making

3 appropriations for the Department of the Interior and re4 lated agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30,
2

HRES 547 RH

1 1995, and for other purposes, and against its consider2 ation are waived.

House Calendar No. 225

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 547

[Report No. 103–749]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reSeptember 30, 1995, and for other purposes. and related agencies for the fiscal year ending appropriations for the Department of the Interior port to accompany the bill (H.R. 4602) making

SEPTEMBER 26, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial  statements included in the Form 10-K of American Safety Razor Company
for the year ended  December  31,  1997,  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000750339
<NAME>                                         AMERICAN SAFETY RAZOR COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1434
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  48738
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3461
<INVENTORY>                                    51488
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103308
<PP&E>                                         114649
<DEPRECIATION>                                 41706
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 254081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          38572
<BONDS>                                        121505
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       121
<OTHER-SE>                                     59318
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   254081
<SALES>                                        296607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               296607
<CGS>                                          196991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  196991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               595
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                24639
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9570
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            15069
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   15069
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.23
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                             571
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,211
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,309
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,856
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,844
<LOANS>                                        102,307
<ALLOWANCE>                                        407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,321
<DEPOSITS>                                      88,883
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,175
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           218
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 121,321
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  128
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    39
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,167
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,176
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,277
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              890
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       35
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    274
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         274
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       181
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     3.0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       457
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   372
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  407
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               407
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
# C_2023015EN.01004001.xml

| 16.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 November 2022 — Financiere Batteur v EUIPO — Leno Beauty (by L.e.n.o beauty)

(Case T-779/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark by L.e.n.o beauty - Earlier national word mark LAINO - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2023/C 15/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Financiere Batteur (Hérouville-Saint-Clair, France) (represented by: P. Greffe and F. Donaud, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Leno Beauty Sas (Vintimille, Italy)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 October 2021 (Case R 514/2021-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Financiere Batteur to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Financiere Batteur to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.

---
#### Randolph L. HOPKINS, Jr., Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 72-1135.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 16, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2023252EN.01004401.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — Aprile and Commerciale Italiana v EUIPO — DC Comics (Representation of a bat in an oval surround)

(Case T-735/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Figurative EU trade mark representing a bat in an oval surround - Absolute grounds for invalidity - Distinctive character - No descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Restriction of the goods covered by the application for a declaration of invalidity - Obligation to state reasons)

(2023/C 252/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Luigi Aprile (San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Italy), Commerciale Italiana Srl (Nola, Italy) (represented by: C. Saettel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: DC Comics (Burbank, California, United States) (represented by: G. Glas, P. Van Dyck and E. Taelman, lawyers)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 September 2021 (Case R 1447/2020-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Luigi Aprile and Commerciale Italiana Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Luigi Aprile and Commerciale Italiana Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 24.1.2022.

---
# C_2023083EN.01002201.xml

| 6.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 January 2023 — Rolex v EUIPO — PWT (Device of a crown)

(Case T-726/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark representing a crown - Earlier EU figurative marks representing a crown and ROLEX - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - No injury to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001))

(2023/C 83/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Rolex SA (Geneva, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Sueiras Villalobos, P. Tent Alonso and V. Gigante Pérez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: PWT A/S (Aalborg, Denmark) (represented by: A. Skovfoged Melgaard and C. Barrett Christiansen, lawyers)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 August 2021 (Case R 2389/2020-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Rolex SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Rolex SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 10.1.2022.

---
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1169

To provide an exception to the coverage of State and local employees under

Social Security.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 29 (legislative day, JUNE 22), 1993

Mr. JOHNSTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To provide an exception to the coverage of State and local

employees under Social Security.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO COVERAGE OF STATE AND

4 LOCAL EMPLOYEES UNDER SOCIAL SECU5 RITY.

6 (a) EMPLOYMENT UNDER OASDI.—Subparagraph

7 (F) of section 210(a)(7) of the Social Security Act (42

8 U.S.C. 410(a)(7)) is amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (iv),
2

•S 1169 IS

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (v),

2 and

3 (3) by inserting after clause (v) the following

4 new clause:

5 ‘‘(vi) by an individual who is characterized

6 as a part-time, seasonal, or temporary employee

7 by such retirement system;’’.

8 (b) EMPLOYMENT UNDER FICA.—Subparagraph

9 (F) of section 3121(b)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code

10 of 1986 is amended—

11 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (iv),

12 (2) by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (v),

13 and

14 (3) by inserting after clause (v) the following

15 new clause:

16 ‘‘(vi) by an individual who is characterized

17 as a part-time, seasonal, or temporary employee

18 by such retirement system;’’.

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

20 this section shall apply with respect to service performed

21 after December 31, 1992.

Æ