Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2020
                              In re LCD Complaint: Urological Supplies (L33803), DAB CR5520 (2020)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




In re LCD Complaint: Urological Supplies (L33803), DAB CR5520 (2020)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





*In re LCD Complaint:*
	Urological Supplies (L33803)
Docket No. C-19-1028Decision No. CR5520January 29, 2020

        
              
    

      DECISION DISMISSING COMPLAINT
I dismiss the complaint in this case.  The party alleging to be aggrieved no longer qualifies as an aggrieved party inasmuch as a Medicare contractor paid the reimbursement claim that is the basis for the complaint in this case.
The party claiming to be aggrieved challenged a Medicare local coverage determination (LCD), LCD ID Number L33803, alleging that she had been denied coverage based on that LCD by Noridian Healthcare Solutions, a Medicare contractor.  On September 20, 2019, I issued an acknowledgment of receipt of an acceptable complaint, an order to the contractor to file the LCD record with me, and a briefing schedule for the aggrieved party and the contractor.
On January 6, 2020, the contractor filed a letter response.  In that letter, the contractor requested an extension of time to file a final brief because the contractor was engaging in an “LCD reconsideration process . . . which will address this matter.”  I infer from that statement that the contractor presently is considering whether to maintain, modify, or rescind the LCD at issue.
However, the contractor also stated that, on January 2, 2020, it had reviewed the aggrieved party’s claim for reimbursement and “individual consideration was granted.” Thus, according to the contractor, the aggrieved party “has immediate relief in this matter.”
Page 2
The aggrieved party filed a response to the contractor’s letter on January 9, 2020.  In her response, the aggrieved party argues that I have no authority to stay the case.  Additionally, the aggrieved party disputes the contractor’s assertion that she has been provided with “immediate relief.”  According to the aggrieved party, it is unclear which of her claims for services have been paid.  She argues, additionally, that there is no guarantee that the contractor will not deny future claims for services based on the LCD.
In order to have standing as an aggrieved party, an individual challenging an LCD must be:  “in need of items or services that are the subject of the coverage determination.”  Social Security Act (Act) § 1869(f)(5); 42 C.F.R. § 426.110.  An individual who has received reimbursement from Medicare for a claimed service has no standing to challenge an LCD.  Likewise, an individual who is denied coverage for a claimed service based on an LCD loses standing to challenge the LCD if the contractor subsequently determines to pay the claim.  *See* Act § 1869(f)(5); 42 C.F.R. §§ 426.110, 426.320(a).
The regulation makes it clear that the burden falls entirely on the aggrieved party to establish that a reimbursement claim has been denied based on the provisions of an LCD.  42 C.F.R. § 426.330.  Absent proof that a specific claim has been denied, the aggrieved party has no standing to challenge the LCD.  In this case, the aggrieved party continues to assert that it is possible, or perhaps, likely, that the contractor has denied claims for services based on the terms of the LCD at issue.  However, the aggrieved party has not identified any specific claims for services that remain outstanding and that the contractor has denied.  Given that, there exists no basis for me to continue this case.
Furthermore, the possibility that the contractor may deny reimbursement claims in the future based on the terms of an LCD provides no basis for a hearing.  The regulation is clear:  there must be an actual, specific, denied claim predicated on the language of an LCD in order to create a basis for a hearing.
Finally, the aggrieved party argues that there may exist a class of Medicare beneficiaries who will be denied reimbursement for services based on the LCD even if she receives reimbursement.  The aggrieved party asserts that this possibility provides a basis for me to hear this case.  I disagree.  The regulations only allow for multiple parties to challenge an LCD in the circumstances where *each* challenging party meets the regulatory definition of an aggrieved party.  42 C.F.R. § 426.410(b)(1).  In order for me to grant a hearing, there must be an aggrieved party whose claim for reimbursement has been denied, specifically, based on the terms of an LCD.  Speculation that other individuals’ claims might be denied provides no ground for a hearing.
The aggrieved party has not established that there exist any claims for Medicare services that the contractor has denied predicated on the LCD at issue.  Consequently, no basis exists for this case to proceed and I must dismiss the complaint.
Page 3
Likewise, I deny the contractor’s request that I stay the case.  There is nothing for me to stay. The contractor may reconsider its LCD; however, I have no jurisdiction over that action.
  
          /s/
        Steven T. Kessel

                      Administrative Law Judge Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back