Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              Board Decisions
                              2022 Board Decisions
                              Michael Lawton, MD, MBA, DAB No. 3077 (2022)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Michael Lawton, MD, MBA, DAB No. 3077 (2022)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Appellate Division





Michael Lawton, MD, MBA
Docket No. A-22-87Decision No. 3077October 28, 2022

        
              
    

      DETERMINATION TO DECLINE REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION

On August 30, 2022, Michael Lawton*,*MD (Petitioner), filed with the Departmental Appeals Board a document which we treated as a notice of appeal of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) dismissal in *Michael Lawton*, CRD Docket No. C-22-621 (2022).  Petitioner had requested a hearing on the Inspector General’s (I.G.) 1999 exclusion of Petitioner.  The basis of the exclusion was Petitioner’s default on student loans borrowed through the Health Education Assistance Loan (HEAL) program, pursuant to section 1128(b)(14) of the Social Security Act.  The ALJ determined the regulations did not authorize ALJ review of the issues Petitioner raised or the ability to grant the relief sought and dismissed the request in accordance with 42 C.F.R. § 1005.2(e).  After reviewing the record to evaluate the issues presented, we have determined that we need not render a separate decision.  Pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 1005.21(g), we therefore decline review of and summarily affirm the ALJ’s dismissal.

The issue before the Board in this matter is not whether the I.G. had a basis to exclude Petitioner but rather whether the ALJ properly dismissed Petitioner’s request for hearing.  Petitioner’s assertions that, despite the Board’s final decision affirming the exclusion in 2001, the ALJ (and evidently the Board) continue to have authority to review the exclusion is unsupported.1

Page 2

Moreover, Petitioner’s assertions that the ALJ (and the Board) have any authority to compel the I.G. to engage in settlement negotiations or to reinstate (or consider reinstating) Petitioner also lack any legal basis.  Board decision DAB No. 1784 became final and binding in 2001 in light of Petitioner’s decision not to appeal that decision to Federal Court.  *See* 42 C.F.R. § 1005.21(j), (k).  To the extent Petitioner seeks reinstatement, as the ALJ noted, the regulations have established a separate process by which an individual may seek reinstatement.  *See*42 C.F.R. Part 1001, Subpart F.  Neither an ALJ nor the Board plays any role in that process (including the determination of whether a petitioner has fully satisfied debts owed) and thus may not require the I.G. to reinstate an individual or compel the I.G. to engage in settlement negotiations for the purpose of reinstatement.2  *See* 42 C.F.R. § 1001.3002.  Only the I.G. can authorize reinstatement, and if reinstatement is denied, the denial is not subject to administrative or judicial review.  *See* 42 C.F.R. § 1001.3004(c).

Page 3

Thus, because Petitioner has not identified any error in the ALJ’s dismissal of the request for hearing and only seeks to continue to challenge the IG’s exclusion as well as request relief that this administrative body is unable to provide, we decline review.3

Endnotes

1 Petitioner, more than two decades ago, unsuccessfully appealed the I.G.’s 1999 exclusion to the ALJ and the Board, and did not further appeal the matter.  *See* *Michael D. Lawton, M.D.*, DAB No. CR771 (2001), *aff’d*, DAB No. 1784 (2001).  Before the Board, Petitioner renews allegations that a document upon which the exclusion is based was fraudulent, which allegation the ALJ and the Board rejected in the 2001 proceedings.  Petitioner also asserts, evidently for the first time in these renewed proceedings, that he never had any HEAL loans and that the default judgment entered against him by the Superior Court of California, County of Orange on June 15, 1992, in case number 68 17 06 was entered in error and that the same court on that same day actually dismissed the proceedings against him because “the lawsuit was based on a fictitious debt.”  Motion for Reconsideration at 3.  In support of this assertion, Petitioner has submitted a copy of the June 15, 1992, default judgment as well as the purported certified results of a records search from the Superior Court of California, County of Orange reflecting the disposition of “Student Loan Marketing Association vs. Michael D. Lawton,” case number 68 17 06 as “dismissed 6/15/1992.”  The document further indicates that the records of the proceedings were destroyed on December 30, 2004.  To the extent Petitioner is requesting that the Board reconsider its decision in DAB No. 1784 based on the submission of allegedly new evidence, we deny Petitioner’s request.  Petitioner pursued his appeals of the I.G.’s 1999 exclusion and argued that his HEAL loan balance had been discharged in bankruptcy.  During that appeal, the I.G. presented evidence of the 1992 default judgment entered against him as support of the ultimate material fact that Petitioner defaulted on his HEAL loans.  Petitioner, therefore, could have challenged that evidence in the 2001 proceedings, but did not.  Petitioner has not provided any credible reason as to why he would not have done so or why evidence of the alleged dismissal was not available in 2001 (or at any point before the records were allegedly destroyed in 2004).  Moreover, Petitioner’s submission of evidence in 2022 that could have been submitted during the 2001 proceedings is not a prompt allegation of “clear error of fact or law” that could possibly serve as a basis for the Board to reopen DAB No. 1784.  *See Rosa Velia Serrano*, Ruling No. 2019-2 at 5 (2019).

2 Mediation is a voluntary process; thus, both parties must agree to participate.  *See* https://www.hhs.gov/about/agencies/dab/adr-services/mediation/index.html.  Upon learning of Petitioner’s request to mediate, the Board staff attorney assigned to this appeal contacted both parties to inquire whether the I.G. would agree to mediation.  The I.G.’s attorney declined to participate in mediation with Petitioner.  In his subsequent submission to the Board entitled “Motion for Offer of Full Settlement and ADR,” Petitioner indicated that the “DAB replaced” the I.G.’s attorney with the staff attorney for the Board and thus the I.G.’s attorney had no authority to “speak for the DAB.”  To clarify for Petitioner, it is the I.G. that must consent to mediate.  Moreover, the Board does not “replace” any party’s chosen representative with any staff attorney from the Departmental Appeals Board and did not do so in this matter.

3 We also deny Petitioner’s Motion for Offer of Full Settlement and ADR, overrule the I.G.’s objection to Petitioner’s Reply, and deny Petitioner’s Request to file a Motion for an Evidentiary Proceeding.
  
          /s/
        Christopher S. Randolph

                      Board Member
          /s/
        Constance B. Tobias

                      Board Member
          /s/
        Karen E. Mayberry

                      Presiding Board Member Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back