alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Thomas J. Shaw,certify that:

1.             I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Retractable Technologies, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.             Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.            Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

c.             Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a.             Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and reportfinancial information; and

b.            Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date:       May 15, 2007

 
|        |   | /s/ Thomas J. Shaw       |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |   | THOMAS J. SHAW           |   |
|   |   | PRESIDENT, CHAIRMAN, AND |   |
|   |   | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  |   |

 

----
# C_2021502EN.01001202.xml

| 13.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 502/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 502/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Schleswig-Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 13 August 2021 — SI and Others v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-497/21)

(2021/C 502/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Schleswig-Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: SI, TL, ND, VH, YT, HN

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Questions referred

| 1. | Is national legislation under which an application for international protection can be rejected as an inadmissible subsequent application compatible with Article 33(2)(d) and Article 2(q) of Directive 2013/32/EU (1) if the unsuccessful initial asylum procedure was conducted in a different EU Member State? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is national legislation under which an application for international protection can be rejected as an inadmissible subsequent application compatible with Article 33(2)(d) and Article 2(q) of Directive 2013/32/EU (1) if the unsuccessful initial asylum procedure was conducted in a different EU Member State?

| 2. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative: Is national legislation under which an application for international protection can be rejected as an inadmissible subsequent application compatible with Article 33(2)(d) and Article 2(q) of Directive 2013/32/EU even if the unsuccessful initial asylum procedure was conducted in Denmark? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative: Is national legislation under which an application for international protection can be rejected as an inadmissible subsequent application compatible with Article 33(2)(d) and Article 2(q) of Directive 2013/32/EU even if the unsuccessful initial asylum procedure was conducted in Denmark?

| 3. | If the answer to Question 2 is in the negative: Is national legislation under which an application for asylum is inadmissible in the event of a subsequent application and which makes no distinction in that respect between refugee status and subsidiary protection status compatible with Article 33(2)[(d)] of Directive 2013/32/EU? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If the answer to Question 2 is in the negative: Is national legislation under which an application for asylum is inadmissible in the event of a subsequent application and which makes no distinction in that respect between refugee status and subsidiary protection status compatible with Article 33(2)[(d)] of Directive 2013/32/EU?

---

(1)  Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).

---
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


Board of Directors
GFSB Bancorp, Inc.

     We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements
(Nos.  333-07131 and 333-51498) on Form S-8 of GFSB Bancorp,  Inc. of our report
dated  July 18,  2003,  relating  to the  consolidated  statement  of  financial
condition  of  GFSB  Bancorp,  Inc.  as  of  June  30,  2003,  and  the  related
consolidated  statements  of earnings  and  comprehensive  earnings,  changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ending June 30, 2003 and 2002,
which report  appears in the June 30, 2003 annual  report on Form 10-KSB of GFSB
Bancorp, Inc.


                                        /s/ Neff + Ricci LLP
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Neff + Ricci LLP

September 26, 2003

Albuquerque, New Mexico
No. 11135.

#### Richards, Receiver, *v.*Anderson.

Decided October 13, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Mahoning county.

*Messrs. Miller & Huxley; Mr. Smith W. Bennett*and *Mr. Patterson A.*Reece, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Hine, Kennedy & Robinson*and *Mr. S. S. Conroy,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
# C_2022432EN.01002701.xml

| 14.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2022 — Privatbrauerei Eichbaum v EUIPO — Anchor Brewing Company (STEAM)

(Case T-609/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark STEAM - Genuine use of the mark - Nature of use - Article 18(1), second subparagraph, heading (a), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2022/C 432/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Privatbrauerei Eichbaum GmbH & Co. KG (Mannheim, Germany) (represented by: M. Schmidhuber and E. Levenson, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: G. Sakalaitė-Orlovskienė and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Anchor Brewing Company LLC (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: I. Kuschel and W. von der Osten-Sacken, lawyers)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Privatbrauerei Eichbaum GmbH Co. KG, seeks partial annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 July 2021 (Case R 780/2020-2), relating to revocation proceedings between the applicant and the intervener.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Privatbrauerei Eichbaum GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Privatbrauerei Eichbaum GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 471, 22.11.2021.

---
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

UTILITY ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant

v.

DIGITAL ALLY, INC., Appellee

______________________

2016

- 1626

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014

- 00725.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

S TEPHEN M. S CHAETZEL , Meunier Carlin & Curfman, LLC, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by D AVID S. M ORELAND

.

J ENNIFER C. B AILEY , Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, argued for appellee. Also represented by A DAM
P RESCOTT S EITZ

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE

, T ARANTO

, and C HEN

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 10, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14690]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

[Docket ID OCC-2018-0016]


Minority Depository Institutions Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of the Treasury, Office of the Comptroller of the 
Currency (OCC).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The OCC has determined that the renewal of the charter of the 
OCC Minority Depository Institutions Advisory Committee (MDIAC) is 
necessary and in the public interest. The OCC hereby gives notice of 
the renewal of the charter.

DATES: The charter of the OCC MDIAC has been renewed for a two-year 
period that began on June 25, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly F. Cole, Deputy Comptroller 
for Compliance Supervision and Designated Federal Officer, (202) 649-
7260, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20219.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of the renewal of the MDIAC charter 
is hereby given, with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, 
pursuant to section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. App. The Comptroller of the Currency has determined that the 
renewal of the MDIAC charter is necessary and in the public interest to 
provide advice and information about the current circumstances and 
future development of minority depository institutions, in accordance 
with the goals established by section 308 of the Financial Institutions 
Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), Public Law 101-
73, Title III, 103 Stat. 353, 12 U.S.C. 1463 note, which are to 
preserve the present number of minority depository institutions, 
preserve the minority character of minority depository institutions in 
cases involving mergers or acquisitions, provide technical assistance, 
and encourage the creation of new minority depository institutions.

    Dated: July 3, 2018.
Joseph M. Otting,
Comptroller of the Currency.
[FR Doc. 2018-14690 Filed 7-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4810-33-P
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,000
<SECURITIES>                                   [BLANK]
<RECEIVABLES>                                  548,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (400,067)
<INVENTORY>                                    [BLANK]
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               312,330
<PP&E>                                         499,197
<DEPRECIATION>                               (418,531)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,485,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,756,780
<BONDS>                                        259,641
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          600,000
<PREFERRED>                                    [BLANK]
<COMMON>                                        52,084
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,183,374)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,485,130
<SALES>                                        811,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               836,000
<CGS>                                          259,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  911,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,893,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               269,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             218,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,760,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   [BLANK]
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,542,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 [BLANK]
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                [BLANK]
<CHANGES>                                      [BLANK]
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,760,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)


</TABLE>
#### Paul MASSEY, Relator, v. Phillip A. FEDERICO, Respondent.

No. 74-279.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 8, 1974.

Prohibition denied.
H. Res. 441

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

May 25, 1994.

Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI

for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee

on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House is

waived with respect to a resolution reported on the legislative

day of May 25, 1994, providing for consideration of the bill

(H.R. 4426) making appropriations for foreign operations,

export financing, and related programs for the fiscal year

ending September 30, 1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
VI

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1186

For the relief of Olga D. Zhondetskaya.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 30, 1993

Mr. COHEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Olga D. Zhondetskaya.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GRANT OF NATURALIZATION TO OLGA D.

4 ZHONDETSKAYA.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, Olga D. Zhondetskaya shall be naturalized

7 as a citizen of the United States upon the filing of the

8 appropriate application and upon being administered the

9 oath of renunciation and allegiance in an appropriate cere10 mony pursuant to section 337 of the Immigration and Na11 tionality Act.
2

•S 1186 IS

1 (b) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

2 FEES.—Subsection (a) shall apply only if the application

3 for naturalization is filed with appropriate fees within 1

4 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Albert Stanley EDGE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-324.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 20, 1968.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Edward J. Winter, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Willoughby v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 203 So.2d 10; and 29 Am.Jur. 2, Evidence, § 382.
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 32150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14842]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 701-TA-588 (Final)]

Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From India

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject 
investigation, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that an industry in the United States is not materially injured 
or threatened with material injury, and the establishment of an 
industry in the United States is not materially retarded by reason of 
imports of polytetrafluoroethylene resin from India, provided for in 
subheadings 3904.61.00 and 3904.69.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 
of the United States, that have been found by the U.S. Department of 
Commerce (``Commerce'') to be subsidized by the government of India.\2\ 
\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ 83 FR 23423, May 21, 2018.
    \3\ Commissioner Kearns did not participated in this 
investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission, pursuant to section 705(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 
1671d(b)), instituted this investigation effective September 28, 2017, 
following receipt of a petition filed with the Commission and Commerce 
by The Chemours Company FC LLC, Wilmington, Delaware. The final phase 
of the investigation was scheduled by the Commission following 
notification of a preliminary determination by Commerce that imports of 
polytetrafluoroethylene resin from India were being subsidized within 
the meaning of section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b(b)). Notice 
of the scheduling of the final phase of the Commission's investigation 
and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by 
posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the 
notice in the Federal Register on March 23, 2018 (83 FR 12815). The 
hearing was held in Washington, DC, on May 17, 2018, and all persons 
who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by 
counsel.
    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 705(b) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)). It completed and filed its 
determination in this investigation on July 6, 2018. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4801 (July 2018), 
entitled Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from India: Investigation No. 
701-TA-588 (Final).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: July 6, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-14842 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
Exhibit
10.2


 


**CERTAIN
INFORMATION, MARKED BY [******], HAS BEEN EXCLUDED BECAUSE IT BOTH (I) IS NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL
IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.**


 


	 		 


 


		


 


Amendment
to Strategic Partnership Agreement Dated November 23, 2020


 


The
parties to the strategic partnership agreement dated November 23, 2020, Mthemovement Kings Pte Ltd and Kraig Biocraft Laboratories,
Inc., for good and valuable consideration, with sufficiency and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged agree to the following
amendment to the strategic partnership agreement.


 


The
parties hereby agree that clause 9 shall be deleted in its entirety and be replace with the following new clause 9 as follows:


 


9.
Commencement, duration and termination


 


The
effective commencement date of this working relationship will be the date of the signing of this SPA and the working relationship
shall remain in force for a period of 60 months from the commencement date.


 


Upon
commencement, and as consideration for its ownership position in the SpydaSilk brand and Joint Venture, KBLB shall issue 1,000,000
share of KBLB stock to MK.


 




    	Page
                                         1
                                         of 2



     


    

 


**CERTAIN
INFORMATION, MARKED BY [******], HAS BEEN EXCLUDED BECAUSE IT BOTH (I) IS NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL
IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.**


 


Upon
commencement, and as consideration for the exclusive sales agreement, MK will issue to KBLB a prepayment of $250,000 to be credited
to the first shipment of spidersilk thread.


 


The
working relationship can be terminated at any time by mutual agreement of the Parties following a consultation period of 120 (one
hundred and twenty) calendar days or such period as agreed otherwise between the parties. In such circumstances, MK will prepare
an up to date statement of account if applicable. If applicable, and in accordance with this statement of account, the Parties
will honour their share of committed expenditure. MK will repay to KBLB any unused SpydaSilk brand funds.


 


The
working relationship will not be automatically renewed and will be reviewed before the end date with a view to assessing delivery
against the objectives set out in this SPA and whether a renewed working relationship aligns with the strategies and objectives
of the Parties.


 


Approved
and signed for on behalf of KBLB (USA) by:


 


	Name:
    	Jon
    Rice	 
	Title:
    	COO	 
	Date:
    	December
    7, 2020	 


 


Approved
and signed for on behalf of MK by:


 


	Name:
    	Walter
    Wee H G	 
	Title:
    	Director
    (Operations)	 
	Date:	 	 


 


Approved
and signed for on behalf of Kings Global Consultants by:


 


	Name:
    	[******]	 
	Title:
    	CEO
    	 
	Date:	 	 


 


Approved
and signed for on behalf of Kings Group by:


 


	Name:	[******]	 
	Title:
    	Director
    Kings Defence Technologies PTE LTD	 
	Date:	 	 


 




    	Page
                                         2
                                         of 2