alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1234 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1234

   To authorize the payment of Servicemen's Group Life Insurance in 
 accordance with title 38, United States Code, as amended effective on 
 December 1, 1992, in the case of certain members of the Armed Forces 
          killed in an aircraft accident on November 30, 1992.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 15 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

  Mr. Baucus introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the payment of Servicemen's Group Life Insurance in 
 accordance with title 38, United States Code, as amended effective on 
 December 1, 1992, in the case of certain members of the Armed Forces 
          killed in an aircraft accident on November 30, 1992.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, for purposes of 
applying subsection (e) of section 1967 of title 38, United States 
Code, to the 13 members of the Air Force killed on November 30, 1992, 
in the mid-air collision of two C-141 Starlifter aircraft during a 
night air-to-air refueling exercise near Harlem, Montana, the amendment 
made by section 201 of Public Law 102-568 (adding such subsection to 
such section 1967) shall be treated as having become effective on 
November 30, 1992 (rather than on December 1, 1992).

                                 <all>
```
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       of
                            Periodic Financial Report
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
                                  Section 1350

I, Gilles Therrien, Vice-President, Finance and Administration, and Chief
Financial Officer of Sand Technology Inc., hereby certify that the Annual Report
on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year ended July 31, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sand
Technology Inc.

Date: January 27, 2006.

                                  /s/ Gilles Therrien
                                      Vice-President, Finance and Administration
                                      and Chief Financial Officer

This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other
purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
<PAGE>   1
  EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENTS RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                           COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

  The following tabulation presents the calculation of primary and fully
  diluted earnings per common share for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998
  and 1997.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       1999          1998          1997
                                                                    ----------    ----------    ----------

  <S>                                                               <C>           <C>           <C>
  Reported net income...........................................    $1,658,110    $3,579,493    $3,512,278
                                                                    ==========    ==========    ==========

  Earnings on common shares.....................................    $1,658,110    $3,579,493    $3,512,278
                                                                    ==========    ==========    ==========

  Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic............     4,429,303     3,994,798     3,807,232
                                                                    ==========    ==========    ==========

  Earnings per common share- basic
    Income from continuing operations...........................    $      .37    $      .90    $      .92
                                                                    ==========    ==========    ==========

    Net income..................................................    $      .37    $      .90    $      .92
                                                                    ==========    ==========    ==========

  Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted..........     4,595,072     4,052,259     3,830,231
                                                                    ==========    ==========    ==========

  Earnings per common share- diluted
    Income from continuing operations...........................    $      .36    $      .88    $      .92
                                                                    ==========    ==========    ==========

    Net income..................................................    $      .36    $      .88    $      .92
                                                                    ==========    ==========    ==========
</TABLE>


             [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank]
Exhibit 32.1
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Arthur A. Rodney

Arthur A. Rodney
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)May 15, 2009
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Willie Medford, Jr., Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00095

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 354th District Court of Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 28497 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Jus tice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, Willie Medford, Jr., has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 28 , 2014 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### The Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Cleveland *v.*Featherstone.

*Board of education*— Compensation *of cleric*— Section *4181, General Code*— Increase *during term*— Cleric *not an*“officer’’— *Section 20, Article II, Constitution.*

(No. 18260

Decided May 20, 1924.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Mr. *Geo. W. Perry,*assistant director of law, for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. William W. Dawson,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reason that the election of the defendant in error by the board of education of the city school district of the city of West Park on January 5, 1920, as clerk of that board, did not confer upon him any function of sovereignty or constitute him an officer within the prohibition of Section '20, Article II of the Constitution of Ohio. The board of education under the power conferred by Section 4781, General Code, having in good faith fixed his compensation at the amounts which are here sought to be recovered, the receipt thereof by the defendant in error was not unlawful.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.

Wanamaker, J., not participating.
# C_2021182EN.01002801.xml

| 10.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/28

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 2 February 2021 — Rigall Arteria Management Sp. z o.o. sp. k. v Bank Handlowy w Warszawie S.A.

(Case C-64/21)

(2021/C 182/41)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in cassation: Rigall Arteria Management Sp. z o.o. sp. k.

Other party to the proceedings: Bank Handlowy w Warszawie S.A.

Question referred

In the light of the wording and purpose of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents, (1) must that provision be understood as conferring on a self-employed commercial agent an absolute right to commission on a contract concluded during the term of an agency contract with a third party whom he or she has previously acquired as a customer for transactions of the same kind, or may that entitlement be contractually excluded?

---

(1)  OJ 1986 L 382, p. 17.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 72 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 72

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
 investigations and studies by the Committee on Armed Services in the 
            first session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1993

 Mr. Dellums submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
 investigations and studies by the Committee on Armed Services in the 
            first session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

    Resolved, That (a) expenses of investigations and studies by the 
Committee on Armed Services (hereinafter in this resolution referred to 
as the ``Committee''), including expenses for--
            (1) procurement of consultant services under section 202(i) 
        of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946; and
            (2) provision of assistance for members of professional 
        staff in obtaining specialized training under section 202(j) of 
        such Act;
there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House not more 
than $2,650,233.
    (b) Not more than $40,000 of the amount specified in subsection (a) 
may be used for consultant services referred to in paragraph (1) of 
such subsection and not more than $8,000 of such amount may be used for 
specialized training referred to in paragraph (2) of such subsection.
    Sec. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers 
authorized by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, 
and approved by the Committee on House Administration.
    Sec. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolution for 
investigations and studies carried out during the period beginning at 
noon on January 3, 1993, and ending immediately before noon on January 
3, 1994.
    Sec. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution shall be 
expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on 
House Administration.

                                 <all>
```
#### Jane Dixon TOPPING, as Executrix of the Estate of John Reid Topping, Appellant, v. HOTEL GEORGE V, Appellee.

No. 72-86.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 8, 1972.

*389Harold. S. Wilson, Clearwater, for appellant.

Lawrence A. Lempert, of Law Offices of Samuel Hyman, Tampa, for appellee.

McNULTY, Judge.

Summary judgment was entered upon an account stated in favor of appellee-hotel and against the estate of John Reid Topping. The sole evidence upon which said summary judgment was entered were answers to interrogatories propounded to ap-pellee by appellant and an affidavit of ap-pellee’s attorney in New York in which he states that he is familiar with the books and records of appellee, that said records reflect an account with appellant’s decedent, and that he, the affiant, understands there was an agreement between appellee’s agents or employees and the decedent that the latter owed such account.

As to the affidavit, it clearly appears that it is pure hearsay. The affiant is not the agent or employee of appellee with personal knowledge of the facts nor is he the person in whose charge, custody and control appellee’s business records are entrusted within the contemplation of the “shop book” rule. As noted, he is merely appel-lee’s attorney seeking collection of the alleged debt. Moreover, it appears that he is not the agent or employee of appellee with whom appellant’s decedent had any agreement or understanding. As such hearsay evidence it is incompetent to support a summary judgment in the light of Rule 1.-510(e), R.C.P., 31 F.S.A., which provides as follows:

> “Supporting and opposing affidavits *shall he made on personal knowledge, shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein.*. . . ” . (Italics supplied.)

Concerning the answers to the interrogatories, they contribute nothing in the way of evidence otherwise supporting the judgment in favor of appellee. First of all, the interrogatories were propounded following receipt of the aforesaid affidavit of appel-lee’s attorney. They relate to the identity of the affiant, his position with appellee and the hearsay matters testified to by such affiant. Finally, and compounding error, the answers to such interrogatories were again sworn to only by the aforesaid attorney and not by other appropriate agents or employees of appellee with knowledge of the facts. In sum, the answers to the interrogatories merely affirmatively establish the hearsay nature of the affidavit referred to above and they relate to no other matters or establish no other facts upon which summary judgment might otherwise be predicated.

Accordingly, summary judgment entered herein is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with *390the controlling provisions of Rule 1.510, R.C.P., or, in the alternative, for the entry of an order denying summary judgment.

Reversed.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
#### Floyd E. BENNETT and Reva Bennett, his wife, Earl Draper and Frances Draper, his wife, Appellants, v. O. L. WILLIAMS, Appellee.

No. 70-299.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 5, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Day International Group, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Thomas J. Koenig, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

|                                         |  | 
|---------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Thomas J. Koenig                    
|Thomas J. Koenig
Chief Financial Officer | 
|August 6, 2004                           | 
|
# C_2023179EN.01002902.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — ZR v EUIPO

(Case T-400/21) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Vacancy notice - Application for interinstitutional transfer - First paragraph of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations - Transfer refusal - Priority order - Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations - Equal treatment - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Duty of care - Corrigendum)

(2023/C 179/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZR (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: G. Predonzani and K. Tóth, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 September 2020 rejecting her application for a transfer to EUIPO.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders ZR to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ZR to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 368, 13.9.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         366,837
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      15,894,080
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,455,502
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,701,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,571,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,701,347
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,812,472
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  861,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                647,257
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            647,257
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   647,257
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                             661
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,024
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (100)
<INVENTORY>                                     43,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,622
<PP&E>                                          73,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,302
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            54
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,225
<SALES>                                        224,349
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,349
<CGS>                                          163,728
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  163,728
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,011
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    67
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,413
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,209
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,209
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of this Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1238

To extend the temporary suspension of the duty on 1-chloro-5-hexanone.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 15 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To extend the temporary suspension of the duty on 1-chloro5-hexanone.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 1-CHLORO-5-HEXANONE.

4 Heading 9902.30.20 of subchapter II of chapter 99

5 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States

6 is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/

7 31/94’’.

8 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by this Act

10 applies with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from
2

•S 1238 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

3 (b) RELIQUIDATION.—Notwithstanding section 514

4 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law,

5 upon proper request filed with the appropriate customs of6 ficer on or before the 90th day after the date of the enact7 ment of this Act, any entry of an article described in sub8 heading 9902.30.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of

9 the United States that was made—

10 (1) after December 31, 1992, and

11 (2) before the date which is 15 days after the

12 date of the enactment of this Act,

13 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry

14 occurred on or after the date that is 15 days after the

15 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ