alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Principal ExecutiveOfficer****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)**

I, Lori A. Jones, of Analytical Surveys, Inc.,certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the yearended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) which this statement accompanies fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Analytical Surveys, Inc.
| Dated: December 22, 2006 |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
| /s/ Lori A. Jones        |   |
| Lori A. Jones            |
| Chief Executive Officer  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C §1350)



I, Lori A. Jones, of Analytical Surveys, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2004 (the
Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Analytical Surveys, Inc.



Dated: December 10, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Lori A. Jones      
|Lori A. Jones          
|Chief Financial Officer
# C_2021431EN.01000901.xml

| 25.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/9

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) made on 11 August 2021 — Eircom Limited v Commission for Communications Regulation

(Case C-494/21)

(2021/C 431/08)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court (Ireland)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Eircom Limited

Defendant: Commission for Communications Regulation

Notice parties: Vodafone Ireland Limited, Three Ireland (Hutchinson) Limited, Three Ireland Services (Hutchinson) Limited

Questions referred

In circumstances where:

| 1. | the telecommunications market has been liberalised and there are multiple telecommunication services providers operating in the market; |
| --- | --- |

1.

the telecommunications market has been liberalised and there are multiple telecommunication services providers operating in the market;

| 2. | one service provider (the ‘Universal Service Provider’ or ‘USP’) has been selected by the National Regulatory Authority (‘NRA’) to perform Universal Service Obligations (‘USOs’); |
| --- | --- |

2.

one service provider (the ‘Universal Service Provider’ or ‘USP’) has been selected by the National Regulatory Authority (‘NRA’) to perform Universal Service Obligations (‘USOs’);

| 3. | it has been determined by the NRA that there is a positive net cost associated with the performance of the USOs (‘USO Net Cost’); and |
| --- | --- |

3.

it has been determined by the NRA that there is a positive net cost associated with the performance of the USOs (‘USO Net Cost’); and

| 4. | it has been determined by the NRA that the USO Net Cost is material compared to the administrative costs of the establishment of a sharing mechanism in respect of the USO Net Cost amongst participants in the market; |
| --- | --- |

4.

it has been determined by the NRA that the USO Net Cost is material compared to the administrative costs of the establishment of a sharing mechanism in respect of the USO Net Cost amongst participants in the market;

If the NRA is required, pursuant to its obligations under the Universal Services Directive 2002/22 (1), to consider whether the USO Net Cost is excessive in view of the ability of the USP to bear it, account being taken of all the USP's characteristics, in particular, the quality of its equipment, its economic and financial situation and its market share (as referred at para. 42 of Base) is it permissible under the Directives for the NRA to conduct that assessment by having regard exclusively to the characteristics/situation of the USP, or is it required to assess the characteristics/situation of the USP relative to its competitors in the relevant market?

---

(1)  Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) (OJ 2002, L 108, p. 51).

---
#### OCALA NATIONAL FOREST CAMPSITE CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. LAKE IMPROVEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. M-469.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 12, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                                          0000947011
<NAME>                                         Royce Biomedical, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         154,001
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,875
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          182,063
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       14,296
<OTHER-SE>                                     (76,993)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,875
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  36,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (36,704)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (36,704)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (36,704)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)



</TABLE>
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 97

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives respecting curriculum

to teach about the horrors of nazism.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 18, 1993

Mr. SAXTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and Labor

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives

respecting curriculum to teach about the horrors of nazism.

Whereas the brutal murder of millions upon millions of innocent people and the unspeakable attempt to commit genocide against the Jews by the Nazis are crimes unparalleled in the history of mankind and constitute acts which

cannot be forgiven and forgotten;

Whereas despite the enormity of the atrocities carried out by

the Nazis, it has been erroneously argued that time

should heal all wounds and that generations born after

the Holocaust should not have to bear responsibility for

that tragedy; and

Whereas since a crucial linchpin to Nazi ideology was racism,

it is incumbent on our society to teach its children that

racism in any form is an anathema to all mankind and
2

•HRES 97 IH

that any group which advocates a policy of racial supremacy is no less guilty than the Nazi and Fascist governments which murdered millions in the name of racial purity: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House that the

2 Department of Education should develop a curriculum for

3 instructing primary and secondary school children in the

4 history of the Nazi rise to power in Germany, the social

5 and economic forces which were the foundations of na6 zism, and the resulting Holocaust which was perpetrated

7 against humanity by the Nazis.

Æ
# C_2022084EN.01002801.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/28

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 15 November 2021 — YV v Stadtverkehr Lindau (B) GmbH

(Case C-685/21)

(2022/C 84/36)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: YV

Defendant: Stadtverkehr Lindau (B) GmbH

Question referred

Does ‘insurer’ within the meaning of Article 11(1) and Article 13(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (1) include an undertaking which, although not an insurance undertaking, is liable under the applicable law as ‘quasi insurer’ for the motor vehicles kept by it, as if it were an insurer under the provisions of insurance law, due to a derogation from the obligation in respect of compulsory insurance within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Directive 2009/103/EC? (2)

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast) (OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1).

(2)  Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability (codified version) (OJ 2009 L 263, p. 11).

---
Exhibit 99(q)

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Newhall Land and Farming Company for the year ended December 31,
2002, I, Donald L. Kimball, Chief Financial Officer (interim) of Newhall Management Corporation, (Principal Financial Officer), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|Dated: March 24, 2003 |  | THE NEWHALL LAND AND FARMING COMPANY
(a California Limited Partnership)
Registrant
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |                                                                                   
|                      |  | By:                                                                               
|                      |  |                                                                                   
|                      |  | By:                                                                               
|                      |  |                                                                                   
|                      |  | By:                                                                               

---
**Exhibit 32**
**CERTIFICATION**
Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in hiscapacity as an officer of Vitran Corporation Inc., that, to his knowledge, theQuarterly Report of Vitran Corporation Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of Vitran Corporation Inc.     Date: October 20, 2004 By: /s/ RICHARD E. GAETZ      Rick E. Gaetz   Chief Executive Officer     Date: October 20, 2004 By: /s/ SEAN P. WASHCHUK      Sean P. Washchuk   Chief Financial Officer
# C_2021349EN.01001601.xml

| 30.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/16

---

Appeal brought on 21 May 2021 by Ryanair DAC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 14 April 2021 in Case T-379/20, Ryanair v Commission (SAS, Sweden; Covid-19)

(Case C-320/21 P)

(2021/C 349/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Ryanair DAC (represented by: E. Vahida and F.-C. Laprévote, avocats, S. Rating, abogado, I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, dikigoros, and V. Blanc, avocate)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, French Republic, Kingdom of Sweden, SAS AB

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal;

| — | declare in accordance with Articles 263 and 264 TFEU that Commission Decision C(2020) 2784 final of 24 April 2020 on State Aid SA.57061 (2020/N) — Sweden — Compensation for the damage caused by the COVID-19 outbreak to Scandinavian Airlines is void; and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare in accordance with Articles 263 and 264 TFEU that Commission Decision C(2020) 2784 final of 24 April 2020 on State Aid SA.57061 (2020/N) — Sweden — Compensation for the damage caused by the COVID-19 outbreak to Scandinavian Airlines is void; and

| — | order the Commission to bear its own costs and pay those incurrent by Ryanair, and order the interveners at first instance and in this appeal (if any) to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to bear its own costs and pay those incurrent by Ryanair, and order the interveners at first instance and in this appeal (if any) to bear their own costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the appellant relies on six pleas in law.

First plea in law: the General Court erred in law in rejecting the appellant’s claim that the Commission breached the requirement that aid granted under Article 107(2)(b) TFEU is not to make good the damage suffered by a single victim.

Second plea in law: the General Court erred in law and committed a manifest distortion of the facts in the application of Article 107(2)(b) TFEU and the proportionality principle in relation to damage caused to SAS AB by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Third plea in law: the General Court erred in law in rejecting the appellant’s claim that the non-discrimination principle has been unjustifiably violated.

Fourth plea in law: the General Court erred in law and committed a manifest distortion of the facts in rejecting the appellant’s claim on the infringement of the freedom of establishment and the free provision of services.

Fifth plea in law: the General Court erred in law and committed a manifest distortion of the facts regarding the failure to open a formal investigation procedure.

Sixth plea in law: the General Court erred in law and committed a manifest distortion of the facts regarding the failure to state reasons.

---
#### BANKERS LIFE & CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, licensed to transact business in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. CANAVERAL INDIAN RIVER GROVES, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 71-453.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 13, 1972.

Rehearing Denied May 8, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2023024EN.01003201.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/32

---

Order of the President of the Ninth of the Court of 6 October 2022 — Ryanair DAC, Laudamotion GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-581/21 P) (1)

(2023/C 24/43)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 462, 15.11.2021.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6310

RONALD NELSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STEVEN J. GAL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-01-4588-2-22-AJ)

Submitted: April 17, 2002 Decided: May 9, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Nelson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Nelson v. Gal, No. CA-01-4588-2-22-AJ (D.S.C. filed Jan.

30, entered Jan. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### HEATH *v.*GLOSTER.

1. Circuit Court Commissioners — Appeal—General Appearance Waived Irregularities in Appeal.

General appearance by plaintiff in circuit court waived any irregularities in appeal by defendant from judgment rendered by eireuit court commissioner.

2. Costs — Vexatious Appeal.

Where, after dismissal of defendant’s appeal to eireuit court from judgment rendered by eireuit court commissioner, plaintiff confessed error and offered to reinstate appeal, which defendant refused, and appealed to Supreme Court, said appeal being vexatious, defendant is required to pay taxable costs and additional fee of $100.

*292Appeal from Wayne; Jayne (Ira W.), J.

Submitted October 14, 1931.

(Docket No. 119, Calendar No. 35,858.)

Decided December 8, 1931.

Summary proceedings before circuit court commissioner by Charles C. Heath against Joanna (Roster to recover possession of land. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appealed to circuit court. From order dismissing appeal, defendant appeals.

Reversed, with costs to plaintiff.

*George B. Murphy,*for plaintiff.

*J. Gilbert Quail,*for defendant.

McDonald, J.

The defendant purchased certain property on land contract from Joseph P. Manning. Subsequently Manning assigned his interest therein to Charles C. Heath, the plaintiff in this suit. Defendant defaulted in her payments. The plaintiff declared a forfeiture and began summary proceedings before the circuit court commissioner. He had judgment. Defendant appealed. The plaintiff entered his general appearance, after which he filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because of a variance between the notice of appeal filed with the circuit court commissioner and that filed with proof of service. From the order of dismissal the defendant has appealed.

The court erred in dismissing the appeal. Having entered a general appearance, the plaintiff waived any irregularity in the notice. *Gotfredson Land Co.*v. *Shevitz,*251 Mich. 75.

Though the defendant is entitled to a reversal of the judgment, it will be with costs to the plaintiff. There was no excuse for the appeal to this court. *293After judgment in the circuit court, the plaintiff conceded error and offered a written stipulation to set aside the order of dismissal and to reinstate the appeal. The defendant refused. The appeal was vexatious and seems to'have been pursued for delay. The defendant will be required to pay the taxable costs in this court with an additional fee of $100.

The judgment is reversed, with costs to the plaintiff.

Butzel, C. J., and Wiest, Clark, Potter, Sharpe, North, and Fead, JJ., concurred.
#### CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. Henry J. DARCANTEL.

No. 54185.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1973.

In re: Henry J. Darcantel applying for writ of certiorari and supervisory writs.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7432 

RICHARD E. DAVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR OHAR, Head of Medical Services,

Greensville Correctional Center,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (CA-05-524-CMH-BRP)

Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: February 2, 2006

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard E. Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Richard E. Davis appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Davis v.

Ohar, No. CA-05-524-CMH-BRP (E.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2005). Davis’

motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT NO. 15

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Gerber Scientific, Inc.:



|Re: | Registration Statements on Form S-8,
|--- | ------------------------------------
|    | File No. 2-93695, No. 33-58668,     
|    | No. 333-26177, No. 333-42879,       
|    | No. 333-81447, No. 333-83463 and    
|    | No. 333-39754                       
|    |                                     
|    | Registration Statement on Form S-3, 
|    | File No. 33-58670                   
|    |                                     

With respect to the subject Registration Statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated November 24, 2003 related to our review of interim financial information.



Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act, such reports are not considered a part of a Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

/ s / KPMG LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
December 11, 2003
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Analytical Surveys, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-53950, No. 33-59940 and No. 333-47365 on Form S-8 of Analytical Surveys, Inc.
of our report dated December 6, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Analytical Surveys, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2002 and
2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended September 30, 2001, which report appears in the
September 30, 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K on Analytical Surveys, Inc.


KPMG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
December 16, 2002


                                       60