alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HARBINGER CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                       826
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,309
<PP&E>                                           9,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,498
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,382
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,496
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,216
<SALES>                                          8,934
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,397
<CGS>                                            1,478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,885
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (193)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,588)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        38
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,654)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambassadors International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Joseph J. Ueberroth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                |  | 
|----------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Joseph J. Ueberroth                         |  | 
|Joseph J. Ueberroth                             |  | 
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer |  | 
|(Principal Executive Officer)                   |  | 
|August 9, 2007                                  |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1


  CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL H. MCILVAIN, PRESIDENT, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
         AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


The undersigned officer of Golden Chief Resources, Inc. hereby certifies that
(a) Golden Chief's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (b information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Golden Chief.


Date: August 8, 2006                        /s/ MICHAEL H. MCILVAIN
                                           ------------------------
                                           Michael H. McIlvain
                                           President, Principal Executive
                                           Officer, and Chief Financial Officer,
                                           Golden Chief Resources, Inc




A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Golden Chief
Resources, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Chief Resources, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1213 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1213

       To make amendments to the Congressional charter for Group 
                 Hospitalization and Medical Services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 1993

   Mr. Nunn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To make amendments to the Congressional charter for Group 
                 Hospitalization and Medical Services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEGAL DOMICILE.

    The first section of the Act entitled ``An Act providing for the 
incorporation of certain persons as Group Hospitalization, Inc.'', 
approved August 11, 1939 (referred to as ``the Act''), is amended by 
adding at the end thereof the following: ``The District of Columbia 
shall be the legal domicile of the corporation.''.

SEC. 2. REGULATORY AUTHORITY.

    (a) In General.--Section 5 of the Act is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``Sec. 5. The corporation shall be licensed and regulated by the 
District of Columbia in accordance with the laws and regulations of the 
District of Columbia.''.
    (b) Repeal.--The Act is amended by striking section 7.

SEC. 3. REIMBURSEMENT OF REGULATORY COSTS BY THE CORPORATION.

    The Act (as amended by section 2) is amended by inserting after 
section 6 the following new section:
    ``Sec. 7. The corporation shall reimburse the District of Columbia 
for the costs of insurance regulation (including financial and market 
conduct examinations) of the corporation and its affiliates and 
subsidiaries by the District of Columbia.''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of 
enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1070 Referred in House (RFH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1070

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 1994

       Referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide that certain politically appointed Federal officers may not 
receive cash awards for a certain period during a Presidential election 
 year, to prohibit cash awards to Executive Schedule officers, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CASH AWARDS TO CERTAIN FEDERAL OFFICERS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 45 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 4507 the following new sections:
``Sec. 4508. Limitation of awards during a Presidential election year
    ``(a) For purposes of this section, the term--
            ``(1) `Presidential election period' means any period 
        beginning on June 1 in a calendar year in which the popular 
        election of the President occurs, and ending on January 20 
        following the date of such election; and
            ``(2) `senior politically appointed officer' means any 
        officer who during a Presidential election period serves--
                    ``(A) in a Senior Executive Service position and is 
                not a career appointee as defined under section 
                3132(a)(4); or
                    ``(B) in a position of a confidential or policy-
                determining character under schedule C of subpart C of 
                part 213 of title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    ``(b) No senior politically appointed officer may receive an award 
under the provisions of this subchapter during a Presidential election 
period.
``Sec. 4509. Prohibition of cash award to Executive Schedule officers
    ``No officer may receive a cash award under the provisions of this 
subchapter, if such officer serves in--
            ``(1) an Executive Schedule position under subchapter II of 
        chapter 53; or
            ``(2) a position for which the compensation is set in 
        statute by reference to a section or level under subchapter II 
        of chapter 53.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for 
chapter 45 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to section 4507 the following:

``4508. Limitation of awards during a Presidential election year.
``4509. Prohibition of cash award to Executive Schedule officers.''.

            Passed the Senate November 24 (legislative day, November 
      23), 1993.

            Attest:

                                             WALTER J. STEWART,

                                                             Secretary.
```
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02482**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 

### 02482\02482_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 02482\02482_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 

### 02482\02482_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02482\02482_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02482\02482_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02482\02482_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02482\02482_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 02482\Certification Statement Plant ID 02482.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Daniel Map 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Daniel Map 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Daniel NPDES WB-1 Flow Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Daniel NPDES WB-2 Flow Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Daniel NPDES WB-3 Flow Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Plant Daniel ICR Section D Drawings D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Plant Daniel ICR Section D Drawings D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Plant Daniel ICR Section D Drawings D-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Plant Daniel ICR Section D Drawings D-4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
.
3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
<PAGE>   1

                                  Exhibit 10(v)

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                      THE NEWHALL LAND AND FARMING COMPANY
                             1995 OPTION/AWARD PLAN


        This First Amendment to The Newhall Land and Farming Company 1995
Option/Award Plan (the "Plan") is adopted as of November 19, 1997.

        The last sentence of paragraph 1.3.A of the Plan, which previously read
as follows:

        "The aggregate number of depositary units that may be issued under the
        Plan will not exceed 600,000, subject to adjustment in accordance with
        the terms of the Plan."

Is hereby amended to read as follows:

        "The aggregate number of depositary units that may be issued under the
        Plan will not exceed 3,650,000, subject to adjustment in accordance with
        the terms of the Plan."

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Newhall Land and Farming Company (a California
Limited Partnership) has adopted this First Amendment to The Newhall Land and
Farming Company 1995 Options/Award Plan.


                              THE NEWHALL LAND AND FARMING COMPANY
                              (A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)

                              By:     Newhall Management Limited Partnership,
                                      Managing General Partner

                              By:     Newhall Management Corporation,
                                      Managing General Partner



                              By:    /s/ THOMAS H. ALMAS
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                     Name:   Thomas H. Almas
                                     Title:  Vice President - Administration
                                                and Secretary
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1174

AN ACT

For the relief of Olga D. Zhondetskaya.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1174

AN ACT

For the relief of Olga D. Zhondetskaya.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1174 ES

1 SECTION 1. GRANT OF NATURALIZATION TO OLGA D.

2 ZHONDETSKAYA.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi4 sion of law, Olga D. Zhondetskaya shall be naturalized

5 as a citizen of the United States upon the filing of the

6 appropriate application and upon being administered the

7 oath of renunciation and allegiance in an appropriate cere8 mony pursuant to section 337 of the Immigration and Na9 tionality Act.

10 (b) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

11 FEES.—Subsection (a) shall apply only if the application

12 for naturalization is filed with appropriate fees within 1

13 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the Senate July 15 (legislative day, June

30), 1993.

Attest:

Secretary.
#### Joseph O’KEEFE, as Administrator of the Estate of Gary O’Keefe, a minor, Deceased, and Joseph O’Keefe, a minor, Deceased, Appellant, v. BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, a non-profit corporation doing business in Palm Beach County, et al., Appellees (two cases).

Nos. 73-688, 73-726.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 15, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Tom Shotts, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7255

TAYBRONNE A. WHITE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN KISER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:20-cv-00199-JPJ-PMS)

Submitted: April 18, 2022 Decided: May 13, 2022

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Taybronne A. White, Appellant Pro Se. Leanna Catherine Minix, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Taybronne A. White seeks to appeal the district court’s final order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that White has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### Emily Louise CASE, Administratrix of the Succession of Joseph Rodney Morvant v. RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY. Mrs. Jeanette SANCHEZ v. RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 62007.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 5, 1978.

In re: Emily Louise Case and Jeanette Sanchez, applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of St. Charles. 355 So.2d 601.

Denied.
#### Ephriam Benjamin and Israel W. Benjamin, copartners, trading as Benjamin Brothers, Respondents, *v.*Daniel J. Brownstein, Philip A. Newmark and Henry W. Louis, Individually and as Copartners, Trading as Brownstein, Newmark & Louis, Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January, 1913.)

City Court of city of New York — motion — costs.

Where by oversight an order affirming an order of the City Court of the city of New York granting a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence does not grant the costs of the motion *85and disbursements, the proper practice is to move for a resettlement of the order.

An order of the City Court of the city of New York, denying defendant’s motion to strike from plaintiff’s bill of costs, taxed after the entry of the order of affirmance of the order for a new trial, items of twenty dollars before argument, forty dollars for argument, and forty-eight dollars and thirty-eight cents for disbursements, must be reversed with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Appeal by the defendants from an order of the City Court of the city of New York denying a motion to strike out certain items from a bill of costs taxed by plaintiffs.

David Bernstein, for appellants.

Morris & Samuel Meyers, for respondents.

*Per Curiam:*

Upon an appeal to this court from an order made at a Special Term of the City Court granting or denying a motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, only ten dollars costs and disbursements are allowable. Brennan v. Joline, 70 Misc. Rep. 537. Disbursements are not taxable unless so specified in the order. Wilson v. Lange, 84 N. Y. Supp. 519. The omission in the order of this court to grant the plaintiffs ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the affirmance of the order granting a new trial in the City Court upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, was evidently an oversight, and the plaintiffs should have applied for a re-settlement of the order. Unless the defendants will stipulate that the plaintiffs may tax ten dollars costs and their disbursements, a motion to re-settle the order will be entertained. As the case now stands, however, the order appealed from must be reversed with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the item of twenty dollars before argument, forty dollars for argument and forty-eight dollars and thirty-eight cents disbursements, stricken from the bill of costs allowed in the lower court as appeal costs, etc.

Present: Seabuky, Lehman and Page, JJ.

Order reversed with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1037

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1991 with respect to the application

of such Act.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 27 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mrs. MURRAY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1991 with respect to

the application of such Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice for Wards Cove

5 Workers Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

7 Section 402 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (42

8 U.S.C. 1981 note) is amended—

9 (1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘(a) IN GEN10 ERAL.—’’; and
2

•S 1037 IS

1 (2) by striking subsection (b).

2 SEC. 3. APPLICATION AND CONSTRUCTION.

3 (a) APPLICATION.—For purposes of determining the

4 application of the amendments made by the Civil Rights

5 Act of 1991, such amendments shall apply to a case that

6 was subject to section 402(b) of the Civil Rights Act of

7 1991 (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment

8 of this Act) in the same manner and to the same extent

9 as such amendments apply to any case brought under title

10 VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e et

11 seq.) that was not subject to section 402(b) of the Civil

12 Rights Act of 1991.

13 (b) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act shall be

14 construed to alter, or shall be considered to be evidence

15 of, congressional intent regarding the application of such

16 amendments to any case that was not subject to section

17 402(b) of the Civil Rights Act of 1991.

Æ
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000728 20-NOV-2014 09:45 AM