II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1090

To rescind unauthorized appropriations for fiscal year 1993.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 10, 1993

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations

A BILL

To rescind unauthorized appropriations for fiscal year 1993.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND TABLE OF CONTENTS.

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the

5 ‘‘Spending Priority Reform Act of 1993’’.

6 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—

Sec. 1. Short title and table of contents.

Sec. 2. Use of money for deficit reduction.

TITLE I—AGRICULTURE APPROPRIATIONS

Sec. 101. Cooperative State Research Service—special research grants.

Sec. 102. Cooperative State Research Service—buildings and facilities.

TITLE II—COMMERCE, JUSTICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY,

AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS

Subtitle A—Department of Commerce
2

•S 1090 IS

Sec. 201. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Sec. 202. International Trade Administration.

Subtitle B—Related Agencies

Sec. 211. Small Business Administration.

Subtitle C—Department of State

Sec. 221. Educational and cultural exchange programs.

Sec. 222. North/South Center.

TITLE III—DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS

Subtitle A—Research, Development, Test and Evaluation

Sec. 301. Defense agencies—university grants.

Sec. 302. Defense agencies—electric vehicle technology.

Sec. 303. Army.

Sec. 304. Medical research.

Sec. 305. Navy.

Sec. 306. Air Force.

Subtitle B—Other Department of Defense Programs

Sec. 311. Defense health programs.

Subtitle C—Operations and Maintenance

Sec. 321. Self-powered locks.

Sec. 322. Athletic competitions.

Sec. 323. Army.

Sec. 324. Defense agencies.

Sec. 325. Hawaii volcano observatory.

TITLE IV—ENERGY AND WATER APPROPRIATIONS

Subtitle A—Corps of Engineers

Sec. 401. General investigations.

Sec. 402. Construction, general.

Subtitle B—Department of Energy

Sec. 411. General investigations.

TITLE V—INTERIOR APPROPRIATIONS

Sec. 501. National Park Service.

Sec. 502. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Sec. 503. National Forest Service.

TITLE VI—TRANSPORTATION APPROPRIATIONS

Sec. 601. Airway science grants.

Sec. 602. Highway research, development, and technology.

Sec. 603. Federal-aid highways.

Sec. 604. Federal highway demonstration projects.

Sec. 605. Transit planning and research.
3

•S 1090 IS

TITLE VII—TREASURY, POSTAL SERVICE, AND GENERAL

GOVERNMENT APPROPRIATIONS

Sec. 701. General Services Administration.

Sec. 702. Office of Personnel Management.

TITLE VIII—VETERANS AFFAIRS, HOUSING AND URBAN

DEVELOPMENT, AND INDEPENDENT AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS

Subtitle A—Department of Veterans Affairs

Sec. 801. Construction grants.

Subtitle B—Independent Agencies

Sec. 811. EPA—research and development.

Sec. 812. EPA—abatement, control, and compliance.

Sec. 813. EPA—buildings and facilities.

Sec. 814. Office of Science and Technology Policy.

Sec. 815. NASA—research and development.

Sec. 816. NASA—construction of facilities.

Subtitle C—Department of Housing and Urban Development

Sec. 821. Special purpose grants.

TITLE IX—BLUE SMOKE AND MIRRORS

Sec. 901. Sense of the Congress.

1 SEC. 2. USE OF MONEY FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION.

2 It is the sense of the Congress that any money re3 turned to the Treasury as a result of this Act should be

4 deposited in the General Fund of the Treasury to be ap5 plied against the Federal budget deficit.

6 TITLE I—AGRICULTURE

7 APPROPRIATIONS

8 SEC. 101. COOPERATIVE STATE RESEARCH SERVICE—SPE9 CIAL RESEARCH GRANTS.

10 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

11 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

12 aside for special research grants provided by the
4

•S 1090 IS

1 Secretary of Agriculture under section 2(c) of the

2 Act of August 4, 1965 (7 U.S.C. 450i(c)); and

3 (2) the amounts were—

4 (A) not specifically authorized;

5 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

6 and

7 (C) not the subject of congressional com8 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

9 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

10 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

11 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap12 propriations made by the Agriculture, Rural Devel13 opment, Food and Drug Administration, and Relat14 ed Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–

15 341; 106 Stat. 878–879); and

16 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

17 amounts.

18 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

19 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

20 amounts provided for special research grants (Conference

21 Report to accompany H.R. 5487, House Report 102–815,

22 pages 10–12):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Aflatoxin (IL) ................................................................................................. $134,000

Agribusiness management (MS) ..................................................................... $75,000

Agricultural diversification (HI) .................................................................... $154,000

Agricultural management systems (MA) ........................................................ $261,000

Agricultural processing (GA) ......................................................................... $50,000
5

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Agricultural trade (ND) ................................................................................. $350,000

Alfalfa (KS) .................................................................................................... $125,000

Alternative cropping systems (Southeast) ...................................................... $278,000

Alternative crops (ND) ................................................................................... $700,000

Alternative marine and fresh water species (MS) .......................................... $275,000

Alternative pest control (AR) ......................................................................... $1,400,000

Alternative to dinoseb (OR) ........................................................................... $225,000

Animal waste disposal (MI) ............................................................................ $120,000

Apple quality research (MI) ........................................................................... $94,000

Aquaculture (general) ..................................................................................... $316,000

Aquaculture (MS) ........................................................................................... $700,000

Aquaculture research (IL) .............................................................................. $200,000

Aquaculture (LA) ........................................................................................... $390,000

Asparagus yield decline (MI) .......................................................................... $94,000

Babcoc Institute (WI) .................................................................................... $75,000

Bean and beet (MI) ........................................................................................ $189,000

Beef carcass evaluation and identification (IA, NY, GA, TX, IL) ................ $210,000

Beef fat content (IA) ...................................................................................... $237,000

Biodiesel research (MO) ................................................................................. $50,000

Broom snakeweed (NM) ................................................................................. $200,000

Canola (KS) .................................................................................................... $100,000

Celery fusarium (MI) ..................................................................................... $39,000

Center for animal health and productivity (PA) ............................................ $134,000

Center for rural studies (VT) ......................................................................... $37,000

Chesapeake Bay aquaculture (MD) ............................................................... $437,000

Competitiveness of agricultural products (WA) ............................................. $800,000

CONSOIL (WI) .............................................................................................. $725,000

Controlled environment production systems (PA) .......................................... $240,000

Cool season legume research (ID, WA) ......................................................... $387,000

Cottonseed extraction and oil refining (TX) .................................................. $75,000

Cranberry/blueberry disease and breeding (NJ) ............................................ $260,000

Dairy goat research (TX) ............................................................................... $75,000

Delta rural revitalization (MS) ...................................................................... $175,000

Dogwood anthracnose (GA, NC, TN) ............................................................ $137,000

Dried bean (ND) ............................................................................................ $100,000

Eastern filbert blight (OR) ............................................................................ $85,000

Environmental research (NY) ........................................................................ $575,000

Expanded wheat pasture (OK) ....................................................................... $337,000

Export development (KY) .............................................................................. $227,000

Farm computer technology (GA) ................................................................... $100,000

Farm and rural business finance (IL, AK) .................................................... $125,000

Fish marketing (OR, RI) ............................................................................... $340,000

Floriculture (HI) ............................................................................................ $296,000

Food and Agriculture Policy Institute (IA, MO) ........................................... $750,000

Food irradiation (IA) ..................................................................................... $237,000

Food marketing policy center (CT) ................................................................ $393,000

Food processing center (NE) ......................................................................... $50,000

Food safety consortium (AR, KS, IA) ........................................................... $1,942,000

Food systems research group (WI) ................................................................ $261,000

Forestry marketing (VT, NH) ....................................................................... $50,000

Global change ................................................................................................. $2,000,000

Grasshopper biocontrol (ND) ......................................................................... $75,000

Great Plains agricultural policy center (KS, OK) ......................................... $100,000

Human nutrition research (NY) .................................................................... $735,000

Human nutrition research (IA) ...................................................................... $500,000

Human nutrition (LA) ................................................................................... $800,000

Improved dairy management practices (PA) .................................................. $335,000

Integrated pest management .......................................................................... $4,457,000

Integrated production systems (OK) .............................................................. $190,000

Iowa biotechnology consortium (IA) ............................................................... $2,000,000

Livestock and dairy policy (NY, TX) ............................................................. $525,000

Lowbush blueberry research (ME) ................................................................. $185,000

Low-input agriculture (MN) ........................................................................... $230,000

Maple research (VT) ...................................................................................... $99,000
6

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Michigan institute ........................................................................................... $2,358,000

Midwest agricultural products ........................................................................ $700,000

Midwest plant biotechnology consortium ........................................................ $2,865,000

Milk safety (PA) ............................................................................................. $184,000

Minor crop pest control (HI) ......................................................................... $285,000

Minor use animal drugs (IR–4) ..................................................................... $464,000

Multi-commodity research (OR) ..................................................................... $300,000

Multi-cropping strategies for aquaculture ...................................................... $150,000

National biological impact assessment ........................................................... $300,000

Nematode resistance genetic engineering (NM) ............................................. $150,000

New uses for agricultural products (OH) ...................................................... $140,000

Non-food agricultural products (NE) ............................................................. $110,000

Oil from jojoba (NM) ..................................................................................... $200,000

Oregon—Mass. biotechnology (MA) ............................................................... $256,000

Peach tree short life (SC) .............................................................................. $192,000

Perishable commodities (GA) ......................................................................... $250,000

Pest control alternatives (SC) ........................................................................ $125,000

Pesticide clearance (IR–4) ............................................................................. $3,500,000

Pesticide impact assessment ........................................................................... $2,968,000

Pesticide research (WA) ................................................................................. $667,000

Phytophthora root rot (NM) .......................................................................... $150,000

Potato research ............................................................................................... $1,435,000

Potato utilization (ND) .................................................................................. $250,000

Poultry (GA) ................................................................................................... $516,000

Preservation and processing research (OK) ................................................... $267,000

Procerum root disease (VA) ........................................................................... $25,000

Product development and marketing center (ME) ......................................... $221,000

Red River Corridor (MN, ND) ....................................................................... $200,000

Regional barley gene mapping project ........................................................... $412,000

Regionalized implications of farm programs (MO, TX) ................................ $348,000

Rural development centers (PA, IA, ND, MS, OR) ...................................... $500,000

Rural environmental research (IL) ................................................................ $125,000

Rural housing needs (NE) ............................................................................. $80,000

Rural policies institute (AR, NE, MO) .......................................................... $692,000

Russian wheat aphid (WA, OR, CA) ............................................................. $437,000

Safflower research (ND, MT) ........................................................................ $250,000

Seafood and aquaculture harvesting, processing, and marketing (MS) ......... $361,000

Seafood research (OR) ................................................................................... $327,000

Small fruit research (OR, WA, ID) ............................................................... $187,000

Soil and water research (OH) ........................................................................ $240,000

Southwest consortium for plant genetics and water resources ...................... $400,000

Soybean bioprocessing (IA) ............................................................................ $328,000

Soybean cyst nematode (MO) ......................................................................... $359,000

STEEP II—water quality in Northwest (ID, WA, OR) ................................ $980,000

Stone fruit decline (MI) ................................................................................. $283,000

Subirrigation research (MI) ........................................................................... $531,000

Sunflower insects (ND, SD) ........................................................................... $200,000

Sustainable agriculture and natural resources (PA) ...................................... $100,000

Sustainable agriculture systems (NE) ........................................................... $70,000

Swine research (MN) ...................................................................................... $140,000

TCK smut (wheat) ......................................................................................... $250,000

Tropical and subtropical ................................................................................. $3,320,000

Urban pests (GA) ........................................................................................... $76,000

Water conservation (KS) ................................................................................ $94,000

Water conservation (NV) ............................................................................... $200,000

Water management (AL) ............................................................................... $398,000

Water quality .................................................................................................. $8,950,000

Weed control (ND) ......................................................................................... $500,000

Wheat genetic research (KS) ......................................................................... $159,000

White mold research (OH) ............................................................................. $55,000

Wild rice research (MN) ................................................................................. $88,000

Wood utilization research (OR, MS, MI) ....................................................... $4,153,000

Wool research (TX) ........................................................................................ $250,000

World food systems (IN, OH) ........................................................................ $368,000
7

•S 1090 IS

1 SEC. 102. COOPERATIVE STATE RESEARCH SERVICE—

2 BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES.

3 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

4 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

5 aside for the construction of buildings and facilities

6 of the Cooperate State Research Service; and

7 (2) the amounts were—

8 (A) not specifically authorized;

9 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

10 and

11 (C) not the subject of congressional com12 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

13 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

14 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

15 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap16 propriations made by the Agriculture, Rural Devel17 opment, Food and Drug Administration, and Relat18 ed Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–

19 341; 106 Stat. 879); and

20 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

21 amounts.

22 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

23 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

24 amounts provided for buildings and facilities (Conference

25 Report to accompany H.R. 5487, House Report 102–815,

26 pages 15–16):
8

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Poultry Center of Excellence (AR) ................................................................. $3,189,000

Agriculture Research Complex-Environmental Stress Lab (AZ) ................... $1,100,000

Alternative pest control containment and quarantine, University of California ............................................................................................................... $178,000

Grape importation facility, University of California at Davis ....................... $582,000

Biotechnology Institute, University of Florida-Alachua ................................. $276,000

Center for Advanced Water Technology, Savannah, GA ............................... $376,000

National Laboratory for Environmentally Sound Production Agriculture,

Tifton, GA .................................................................................................. $1,293,000

Vidalia Onion Storage Res. Facility (GA) ..................................................... $194,000

Center for Tropical/Subtropical Agriculture (HI) .......................................... $3,311,000

Biotechnology Facility (ID) ............................................................................ $431,000

Biotechnology Center, Northwestern University (IL) .................................... $517,000

Molecular and Cellular Biotechnology Facility (IN) ...................................... $2,155,000

Throckmorton Plant Science Center, Kansas State University (KS) ............ $1,353,000

Presque Isle Farm building construction (ME) ............................................. $776,000

Institute for Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of

Maryland (MD) ........................................................................................... $862,000

Center for hunger, poverty, nutrition and policy (MS) .................................. $484,000

Food Toxicology Center, Michigan State University ..................................... $4,616,000

Biological Technology Center for Water and Wetlands Resources (MS) ...... $86,000

Bioscience Research Laboratory, Montana State University ......................... $915,000

Biochemistry and Biology, University of Nevada .......................................... $215,000

Plant Bioscience Facility, Rutgers University (NJ) ...................................... $2,623,000

Cornell Research Greenhouse (NY) ............................................................... $376,000

New York Botanical Garden .......................................................................... $3,697,000

Bowman-Gray Center at Wake Forest (NC) ................................................. $3,684,000

Food Processing Pilot Plant—NCI (ND) ...................................................... $375,000

Inst/Ag Health Science and Rural Medicine, Univ. of North Dakota (ND) . $1,864,000

Inst/Ag and Rural Human Research Development, Minot State University

(ND) ........................................................................................................... $1,939,000

Seed Research and Regulatory Facility, North Dakota State University

(ND) ........................................................................................................... $431,000

Plant Science Research Facility, University of Toledo (OH) ........................ $237,000

Seafood Center, Oregon State University (OR) ............................................. $1,824,000

Center for Food Marketing, St. Joseph’s University (PA) ............................ $2,336,000

Building consolidation, University of Rhode Island (RI) ............................... $431,000

Northern Plains Biostress Laboratory, South Dakota State University

(SD) ............................................................................................................ $875,000

Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Research Complex, University

of Tennessee in Knoxville, (TN) ................................................................. $797,000

Nursery Crop Research Station (TN) ............................................................ $367,000

Inst/Biosciences and Technology, Texas A & M (TX) ................................... $603,000

Biotechnology Laboratory, Utah State University (UT) ............................... $658,000

Agriculture Biotechnology Facility, Virginia Polytechnic Institute (VA) ...... $880,000

Animal Disease Biotechnology Facility, Washington State University (WA) $2,258,000

Agriculture Biotechnology/Genetics Facility, University of Wisconsin/Madison (WI) ..................................................................................................... $2,161,000

College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point (WI) . $86,000

Environmental Simulation Facility, University of Wyoming (WY) ............... $431,000
9

•S 1090 IS

1 TITLE II—COMMERCE, JUSTICE,

2 AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY,

3 AND RELATED AGENCIES AP4 PROPRIATIONS

5 Subtitle A—Department of

6 Commerce

7 SEC. 201. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMIN8 ISTRATION.

9 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

10 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

11 aside for construction, the National Ocean Service,

12 the National Marine Fisheries Service, oceanic and

13 atmospheric research, National Weather Service,

14 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

15 construction, and miscellaneous projects; and

16 (2) the amounts were—

17 (A) not specifically authorized;

18 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

19 (C) not the subject of congressional com20 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

21 and

22 (D) first added by the Committee of Con23 ference.

24 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
10

•S 1090 IS

1 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

2 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap3 propriations made by the Departments of Com4 merce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Relat5 ed Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–

6 395; 106 Stat. 1849–1850); and

7 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

8 amounts.

9 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

10 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are as follows (Con11 ference Report to accompany H.R. 5678, House Report

12 102–918, pages 50–66):

13 (1) NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE.—

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Great Lakes Mapping Projects ...................................................................... $465,000

South Carolina Cooperative Geodetic Survey ................................................. $554,000

Land Information Systems ............................................................................. $1,674,000

Observation buoys (CA) (conference) ............................................................. $140,000

Chesapeake Bay Observation buoys (conference) .......................................... $400,000

Institute for Marine Engineers (conference) .................................................. $500,000

South Carolina Wetland Demonstration Project ........................................... $1,800,000

CZM program administration ........................................................................ $3,597,000

Charleston Special Area Management plan ................................................... $960,000

Hawaii Humpback Marine Sanctuary Institute ............................................. $144,000

14 (2) NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE.—

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Stuttgart Aquaculture (AR) ........................................................................... $576,000

Winter Run Chinook Salmon (conference) ..................................................... $500,000

Center for Shark Research ............................................................................. $140,000

Hawaii Stock Management ............................................................................. $500,000

Fish Cooperative Institute .............................................................................. $384,000

Hawaiian Monk Seals ..................................................................................... $520,000

Stellar Sea Lion Recovery Plan ..................................................................... $1,440,000

Hawaiian Sea Turtles ..................................................................................... $240,000

Atlantic Blue Fin Tuna Project ..................................................................... $300,000

Pacific pelagic species management ............................................................... $1,606,000
11

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Beluga Whale Committee ............................................................................... $192,000

Dolphin Safe Technologies ............................................................................. $500,000

East Coast Observers ..................................................................................... $700,000

Export Strategies/Mahi Mahi ......................................................................... $768,000

Andromous Fishery Project ............................................................................ $186,000

Fish Oils ......................................................................................................... $900,000

1 (3) OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH.—

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

VENTS ........................................................................................................... $2,496,000

S.E. U.S. FOCI Program ............................................................................... $1,000,000

Upper New England Marine Research ........................................................... $1,900,000

NOAA Undersea Research Program .............................................................. $15,998,000

2 (4) NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE.—

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Agriculture and fruit frost ............................................................................. $2,316,000

Fire Weather Services .................................................................................... $449,000

3 (5) NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC AD4 MINISTRATION CONSTRUCTION.—

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Boston Biotechnology Innovation Center (conference) .................................. $1,000,000

Woods Hole Marine Biology Center ............................................................... $1,000,000

U. of New Hampshire Biology Center ........................................................... $15,000,000

Mystic, CT Maritime Education and Research Center (conference) ............. $1,000,000

NMFS Charleston Fisheries Laboratory ........................................................ $700,000

Beaufort, NC Laboratory ............................................................................... $182,000

Juneau/Kodiak Laboratory A&E .................................................................... $100,000

5 SEC. 202. INTERNATIONAL TRADE ADMINISTRATION.

6 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
12

•S 1090 IS

1 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

2 aside for special research grants provided for the

3 International Trade Administration;

4 (2) the amounts were—

5 (A) not specifically authorized;

6 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

7 and

8 (C) not the subject of congressional com9 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

10 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

11 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

12 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap13 propriations made by the Department of Commerce,

14 Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agen15 cies Appropriation Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–395; 106

16 Stat. 1851); and

17 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

18 amounts.

19 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

20 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

21 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5678, House Re22 port 102–918, page 67):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Tailored Clothing Technology Corporation (TC 2) ........................................ $3,149,000

National Textile Center .................................................................................. $7,448,000

New Materials Center ..................................................................................... $2,850,000
13

•S 1090 IS

1 Subtitle B—Related Agencies

2 SEC. 211. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.

3 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

4 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

5 aside for salaries and expenses; and

6 (2) the amounts were—

7 (A) not specifically authorized;

8 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

9 (C) not the subject of congressional com10 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

11 and

12 (D) first added by the Committee of Con13 ference.

14 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

15 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

16 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap17 propriations made by the Departments of Com18 merce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Relat19 ed Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–

20 395; 106 Stat. 1862–1863); and

21 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

22 amounts.

23 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

24 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are as follows:
14

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Ohio Dept. of Development International Trade project ............................... $500,000

Small Business Databases (PA) and Transportation Linkages .................... $1,000,000

Worchester Centrum and Exhibition Hall Infrastructure .............................. $1,500,000

St. Vincent/Francis Center for Global Competitiveness ................................. $800,000

Pittsburgh District Pilot Project .................................................................... $100,000

St. Louis Biomedical Center .......................................................................... $400,000

Washington State University Research .......................................................... $500,000

Hazard Community College ............................................................................ $750,000

Morgan County High School .......................................................................... $1,000,000

Kansas Small Business Development Center ................................................. $500,000

Vermont Small Business Development Center ............................................... $1,000,000

Technical Assistance Univ. of Arkansas ........................................................ $465,000

Univ. of Kansas - Science & Tech .................................................................. $4,185,000

Massachusetts Biotech Institute .................................................................... $1,395,000

New York City Library .................................................................................. $930,000

Indiana State University Center for Interdisciplinary Studies ...................... $1,395,000

Center for Manufacturing Products ............................................................... $465,000

St. Louis Biomedical Center .......................................................................... $400,00

1 Subtitle C—Department of State

2 SEC. 221. EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL EXCHANGE PRO3 GRAMS.

4 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

5 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

6 aside for the general enhancement of the exchange

7 programs of the United States Information Agency;

8 and

9 (2) the amounts were—

10 (A) not specifically authorized;

11 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

12 (C) not the subject of congressional com13 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

14 and

15 (D) first added by the Committee of Con16 ference.
15

•S 1090 IS

1 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

2 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

3 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap4 propriations made by the Departments of Com5 merce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Relat6 ed Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–

7 395; 106 Stat. 1870–1871); and

8 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

9 amounts.

10 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

11 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

12 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5678, House Re13 port 102–918, page 97):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

World Scholar-Athlete Games ........................................................................ $800,000

General Enhancement for Exchange Programs ............................................. $9,250,000

14 SEC. 222. NORTH/SOUTH CENTER.

15 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

16 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

17 aside for the North/South Center; and

18 (2) the amounts were—

19 (A) not specifically authorized;

20 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

21 (C) not the subject of congressional com22 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
16

•S 1090 IS

1 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

2 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

3 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap4 propriations made by the Departments of Com5 merce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Relat6 ed Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–

7 395; 106 Stat. 1872); and

8 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

9 amounts.

10 (c) AMOUNT.—Except to the extent obligated, the

11 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

12 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5678, House Re13 port 102–918, page 99):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

North/South Center at the University of Miami, in Miami, Florida ............. $8,700,000

14 TITLE III—DEFENSE

15 APPROPRIATIONS

16 Subtitle A—Research,

17 Development, Test and Evaluation

18 SEC. 301. DEFENSE AGENCIES—UNIVERSITY GRANTS.

19 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

20 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

21 aside for university grants; and

22 (2) the amounts were—

23 (A) not specifically authorized;
17

•S 1090 IS

1 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

2 (C) not the subject of congressional com3 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

4 and

5 (D) first added by the Committee of Con6 ference.

7 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

8 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

9 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap10 propriations made by the Department of Defense

11 Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106

12 Stat. 1893–1895); and

13 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

14 amounts.

15 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

16 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

17 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re18 port 102–1015, pages 14–15):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Texas Regional Institute for Environmental Studies ..................................... $5,000,000

University of Maryland ................................................................................... $7,500,000

University of Scranton ................................................................................... $3,500,000

Spokane Intercollegiate Research and Technology Institute ......................... $15,000,000

Northeastern University ................................................................................. $9,000,000

Colorado State University .............................................................................. $5,000,000

Louisiana State University ............................................................................. $4,000,000

Illinois Institute of Technology ...................................................................... $5,000,000

Loma Linda University .................................................................................. $5,000,000

University of Minnesota ................................................................................. $2,000,000

University of Miami, Florida .......................................................................... $2,000,000

University of Michigan ................................................................................... $500,000

University of Pennsylvania ............................................................................. $7,500,000

Villanova University ....................................................................................... $2,000,000

Medical College of Ohio .................................................................................. $1,000,000

Rochester Institute of Technology .................................................................. $3,000,000
18

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Bryant College of Rhode Island ..................................................................... $2,000,000

Bradley University of Illinois ......................................................................... $7,500,000

University of South Florida ........................................................................... $2,000,000

Science Center of Connecticut ........................................................................ $3,000,000

National Biomedical Research Foundation .................................................... $10,000,000

1 SEC. 302. DEFENSE AGENCIES—ELECTRIC VEHICLE TECH2 NOLOGY.

3 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

4 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

5 aside for electrical vehicle demonstration projects;

6 and

7 (2) the amounts were—

8 (A) not specifically authorized;

9 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

10 and

11 (C) not the subject of congressional com12 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

13 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

14 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

15 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap16 propriations made by the Department of Defense

17 Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106

18 Stat. 1893); and

19 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

20 amounts.
19

•S 1090 IS

1 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

2 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

3 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re4 port 102–1015, page 118):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

For an electrical vehicle demonstration project in the State of Hawaii ........ $5,000,000

For an electrical vehicle demonstration project in Sacramento, CA, involving the McClellan Air Force Base and the Sacramento Municipal Utility

District ........................................................................................................ $2,500,000

5 SEC. 303. ARMY.

6 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

7 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

8 aside for industrial preparedness and manufacturing

9 technology development programs; and

10 (2) the amounts were—

11 (A) not specifically authorized;

12 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

13 and

14 (C) not the subject of congressional com15 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

16 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

17 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

18 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap19 propriations made by the Department of Defense

20 Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106

21 Stat. 1890–1891); and
20

•S 1090 IS

1 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

2 amounts.

3 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

4 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

5 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re6 port 102–1015, pages 125–126):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

For the establishment of a flexible manufacturing center at the Scranton

Army Ammunition Plant ............................................................................ $7,500,000

For large-scale investigation of the GP–160 Vaccine for Acquired Immune

Deficiency Syndrome .................................................................................. $20,000,000

7 SEC. 304. MEDICAL RESEARCH.

8 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

9 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

10 aside for medical research; and

11 (2) the amounts were—

12 (A) not specifically authorized;

13 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

14 (C) not the subject of congressional com15 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

16 and

17 (D) first added by the Committee of Con18 ference, in the case of $185,000,000 of the

19 amount provided for the item listed in sub20 section (c) relating to breast cancer research.

21 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
21

•S 1090 IS

1 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

2 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap3 propriations made by the Department of Defense

4 Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106

5 Stat. 1890–1891); and

6 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

7 amounts.

8 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

9 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

10 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re11 port 102–1015, page 119):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Prostate cancer research ................................................................................ $2,000,000

Breast cancer research ................................................................................... $210,000,000

AIDS research ................................................................................................ $58,891,000

12 SEC. 305. NAVY.

13 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

14 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

15 aside for naval research, development, testing, and

16 evaluation; and

17 (2) the amounts were—

18 (A) not specifically authorized;

19 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

20 (C) not the subject of congressional com21 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

22 and
22

•S 1090 IS

1 (D) first added by the Committee of Con2 ference, in the case of the item listed in sub3 section (c) relating to the West Virginia High

4 Technology Corporation.

5 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

6 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

7 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap8 propriations made by the Department of Defense

9 Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106

10 Stat. 1891–1892); and

11 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

12 amounts.

13 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

14 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

15 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re16 port 102–1015, pages 126):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

For the West Virginia High Technology Corporation .................................... $1,500,000

For the National Center for Acoustics, Mississippi Resource Development

Corporation ................................................................................................. $1,000,000

17 SEC. 306. AIR FORCE.

18 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

19 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

20 aside for projects of the Space Surveillance Network

21 Improvement Program; and

22 (2) the amounts were—
23

•S 1090 IS

1 (A) not specifically authorized;

2 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

3 and

4 (C) not the subject of congressional com5 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

6 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

7 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

8 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap9 propriations made by the Department of Defense

10 Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106

11 Stat. 1892); and

12 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

13 amounts.

14 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

15 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

16 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re17 port 102–1015, page 136):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

To continue the Advanced Electro-Optical System project at the Air Force

Maui Optical Station .................................................................................. $39,500,000

To continue the research program on development of coal-based, high thermal stability and endothermic jet fuels ...................................................... $2,000,000

18 Subtitle B—Other Department of

19 Defense Programs

20 SEC. 311. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAMS.

21 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
24

•S 1090 IS

1 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

2 aside for efforts to prevent brown tree snakes from

3 entering Hawaii from Guam; and

4 (2) the amounts were—

5 (A) not specifically authorized;

6 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

7 and

8 (C) not the subject of congressional com9 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

10 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

11 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

12 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap13 propriations made by the Department of Defense

14 Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106

15 Stat. 1897); and

16 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

17 amounts.

18 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

19 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

20 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re21 port 102–1015, page 151):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

For brown tree snakes .................................................................................... $1,000,000
25

•S 1090 IS

1 Subtitle C—Operations and

2 Maintenance

3 SEC. 321. SELF-POWERED LOCKS.

4 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

5 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

6 aside for providing, to the services and agencies

7 funded by the Department of Defense, self-powered

8 locks necessary to initiate a retrofit program to re9 place locks that do not meet current specifications;

10 and

11 (2) the amounts were—

12 (A) not specifically authorized;

13 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

14 and

15 (C) not the subject of congressional com16 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

17 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

18 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

19 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap20 propriations made by the Department of Defense

21 Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106

22 Stat. 1878–1883); and

23 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

24 amounts.
26

•S 1090 IS

1 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

2 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

3 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re4 port 102–1015, page 55):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

For the Defense Logistics Agency to provide to the Services and Agencies

self-powered locks ....................................................................................... $15,000,000

5 SEC. 322. ATHLETIC COMPETITIONS.

6 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

7 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

8 aside for the World University Competition, the

9 1996 Summer Olympics, and World Cup USA 1994;

10 and

11 (2) the amounts were—

12 (A) not specifically authorized;

13 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

14 and

15 (C) not the subject of congressional com16 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

17 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

18 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

19 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap20 propriations made by the Department of Defense

21 Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106

22 Stat. 1884–1885); and
27

•S 1090 IS

1 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

2 amounts.

3 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

4 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

5 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re6 port 102–1015, page 51):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

For the World University Competition .......................................................... $6,000,000

For the 1996 Summer Olympics .................................................................... $2,000,000

For World Cup USA 1994 ............................................................................. $9,000,000

7 SEC. 323. ARMY.

8 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

9 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

10 aside for procurement of extended cold weather

11 clothing systems; and

12 (2) the amounts were—

13 (A) not specifically authorized;

14 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

15 and

16 (C) not the subject of congressional com17 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

18 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

19 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

20 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap21 propriations made by the Department of Defense
28

•S 1090 IS

1 Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106

2 Stat. 1879); and

3 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

4 amounts.

5 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

6 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

7 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re8 port 102–1015, page 62):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

For the procurement of Extended Cold Weather Clothing Systems .............. $36,000,000

9 SEC. 324. DEFENSE AGENCIES.

10 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

11 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

12 aside for the study, assessment, and identification of

13 nuclear waste disposal by the former Soviet Union,

14 and Project PEACE; and

15 (2) the amounts were—

16 (A) not specifically authorized;

17 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

18 and

19 (C) not the subject of congressional com20 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

21 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

22 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

23 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap-
29

•S 1090 IS

1 propriations made by the Department of Defense

2 Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106

3 Stat. 1928); and

4 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

5 amounts.

6 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

7 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

8 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re9 port 102–1015, pages 27 and 171):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

For the study, assessment, and identification of nuclear waste disposal by

the former Soviet Union in the Arctic region ............................................ $10,000,000

For Project PEACE ....................................................................................... $25,000,000

10 SEC. 325. HAWAII VOLCANO OBSERVATORY.

11 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

12 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

13 aside for monitoring volcanic activity affecting the

14 United States Army Pohakuloa training area; and

15 (2) the amounts were—

16 (A) not specifically authorized;

17 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

18 and

19 (C) not the subject of congressional com20 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

21 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—
30

•S 1090 IS

1 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

2 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap3 propriations made by the Department of Defense

4 Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–396; 106

5 Stat. 1881); and

6 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

7 amounts.

8 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

9 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

10 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5504, House Re11 port 102–1015, page 77):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

For the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory for monitoring volcanic activity affecting the United States Army Pohakuloa Training Area ........................ $500,000

12 TITLE IV—ENERGY AND WATER

13 APPROPRIATIONS

14 Subtitle A—Corps of Engineers

15 SEC. 401. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS.

16 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

17 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

18 aside for surveys and planning activities of the Army

19 Corps of Engineers; and

20 (2) the amounts were—

21 (A) not specifically authorized;

22 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
31

•S 1090 IS

1 (C) not the subject of congressional com2 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

3 and

4 (D) first added by the Committee of Con5 ference.

6 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

7 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

8 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap9 propriations made by the Energy and Water Devel10 opment Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–377;

11 106 Stat. 1317); and

12 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

13 amounts.

14 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

15 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

16 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5373, House Re17 port 102–866, page 25):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Kaumalapau Harbor, HI ................................................................................ $500,000

18 SEC. 402. CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL.

19 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

20 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

21 aside for construction of water resource projects of

22 the Army Corps of Engineers; and

23 (2) the amounts were—
32

•S 1090 IS

1 (A) not specifically authorized;

2 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

3 (C) not the subject of congressional com4 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

5 and

6 (D) first added by the Committee of Con7 ference.

8 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

9 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

10 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap11 propriations made by the Energy and Water Devel12 opment Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–377;

13 106 Stat. 1321–1322); and

14 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

15 amounts.

16 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

17 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

18 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5373, House Re19 port 102–866, pages 35–41):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Molly Ann’s Brook, NJ .................................................................................. $1,000,000

St. George Harbor, AK .................................................................................. $3,000,000

Cochiti Lake, NM ........................................................................................... $1,900,000

20 Subtitle B—Department of Energy

21 SEC. 411. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS.

22 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
33

•S 1090 IS

1 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

2 aside for energy supply, research, and development

3 activities; and

4 (2) the amounts were—

5 (A) not specifically authorized;

6 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

7 (C) not the subject of congressional com8 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

9 and

10 (D) first added by the Committee of Con11 ference.

12 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

13 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

14 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap15 propriations made by the Energy and Water Devel16 opment Appropriations Act, 1993 (Pub. L. 102–377;

17 106 Stat. 1333); and

18 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

19 amounts.

20 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

21 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

22 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5373, House Re23 port 102–866, pages 73–74):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Bishop Science Center, HI ............................................................................. $10,000,000
34

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Ambulatory Research and Education Building, Oregon Health Sciences

University ................................................................................................... $10,000,000

Center for Energy and Environmental Resources, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge ....................................................................................... $10,000,000

Advanced Technologies Institute, University of Connecticut ......................... $10,000,000

Biomedical Research Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham ......... $10,000,000

Cancer Treatment Facility for the Indiana University School of Medicine at

Indianapolis ................................................................................................ $10,000,000

Cancer Institute of New Jersey ...................................................................... $10,000,000

Northeast Environmental Resource and Renewal Facility—Mayfield, Pennsylvania ....................................................................................................... $6,800,000

Center for Advanced Industrial Process, Washington State University,

Washington ................................................................................................. $8,000,000

Hahnemann University Ambulatory Care and Teaching Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ...................................................................................... $10,000,000

Midwest Plant Biotechnology Consortium (U. of Chicago and Washington

U.) ............................................................................................................... $2,500,000

1 TITLE V—INTERIOR

2 APPROPRIATIONS

3 SEC. 501. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE.

4 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

5 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

6 aside for the operation of the National Park Service;

7 and

8 (2) the amounts were—

9 (A) not specifically authorized;

10 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

11 and

12 (C) not the subject of congressional com13 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

14 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

15 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

16 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap17 propriations made by the Department of the Interior
35

•S 1090 IS

1 and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993

2 (Pub. L. 102–381; 106 Stat. 1381–1383); and

3 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

4 amounts.

5 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

6 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

7 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5503, House Re8 port 102–901, pages 28–30):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Birmingham Heritage Corridor, AL .............................................................. $250,000

Horseshoe Curve NHL, PA ............................................................................ $250,000

National Constitution Center, PA .................................................................. $250,000

Native Hawaiian Culture and Arts Program, HI .......................................... $2,000,000

Wheeling National Heritage Area, WV .......................................................... $2,324,000

William Douglas Outdoor Education Center, CA .......................................... $250,000

August Canal NHL, GA ................................................................................. $75,000

Botto House, American Labor Museum, NJ ................................................. $140,000

Kershaw House, SC ........................................................................................ $125,000

Lincoln Center, IL .......................................................................................... $1,700,000

Walk on the Mountain, WA ........................................................................... $2,000,000

Mimbres NM, NM .......................................................................................... $150,000

9 SEC. 502. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE.

10 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

11 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

12 aside for construction projects; and

13 (2) the amounts were—

14 (A) not specifically authorized;

15 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

16 and

17 (C) not the subject of congressional com18 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.
36

•S 1090 IS

1 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

2 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

3 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap4 propriations made by the Department of the Interior

5 and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993

6 (Pub. L. 102–381; 106 Stat. 1379–1380); and

7 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

8 amounts.

9 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

10 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

11 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5503, House Re12 port 102–901, pages 23–26):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Appropriate technology transfer for rural areas ............................................ $1,300,000

Forensics Laboratory, OR .............................................................................. $195,000

Lake Champlain activities .............................................................................. $500,000

Biodiversity initiative, University of Nevada-Reno, NV ................................. $1,050,000

Patuxent (Maintenance) ................................................................................. $100,000

Leetown (environmental and handicapped fishing complex) .......................... $75,000

Co-op unit vacancies ....................................................................................... $73,000

Audubon Species Institute, LA ...................................................................... $8,672,000

Bowerman Basin NWR, WA .......................................................................... $500,000

California Condor breeding facility, CA ......................................................... $400,000

Cameron Prairie National Wildlife Refuge, LA ............................................. $2,900,000

Cape Romain National Wildlife Refuge, OR .................................................. $600,000

Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge, VA .................................................. $400,000

Coquille Point National Wildlife Refuge, OR ................................................. $400,000

Craig Brook NFH, ME .................................................................................. $400,000

DC Booth Hatchery, SD ................................................................................ $1,250,000

Dexter National Fish Hatcher, NM ............................................................... $1,428,000

Hakalau National Wildlife Refuge, HI .......................................................... $300,000

Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, AK .............................................................. $2,500,000

Las Vegas National Wildlife Refuge, NM ...................................................... $2,000,000

National Education and Training Center, WV .............................................. $15,000,000

Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge, OH ........................................................... $2,700,000

Pacific Institute of Natural Sciences, OR ...................................................... $1,700,000

Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, MD ........................................................ $626,000

Tishomingo National Wildlife Refuge, OK .................................................... $450,000

Wichita Environmental Education Center, KA .............................................. $2,000,000
37

•S 1090 IS

1 SEC. 503. NATIONAL FOREST SERVICE.

2 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

3 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

4 aside for projects of the National Forest Service;

5 and

6 (2) the amounts were—

7 (A) not specifically authorized;

8 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

9 and

10 (C) not the subject of congressional com11 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

12 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

13 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

14 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap15 propriations made by the Department of the Interior

16 and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993

17 (Pub. L. 102–381; 106 Stat. 1397–1399); and

18 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

19 amounts.

20 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

21 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

22 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5503, House Re23 port 102–901, pages 47–55):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Termiticides at Gulfport, MS ......................................................................... $120,000

Blue Mountains Institute at LaGrande, OR .................................................. $100,000

Hardwoods ecology at Asheville, NC .............................................................. $200,000
38

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Integrated forest management center, AR ..................................................... $200,000

Global change at Raleigh, NC ........................................................................ $72,000

Southwestern forestry, Fort Collins, CO ........................................................ $300,000

Timber and Watershed at Honolulu, HI ........................................................ $100,000

Genetics at Rhinelander, WI .......................................................................... $65,000

Management Practices at Parsons, WV ......................................................... $60,000

Timber bridges for West Virginia University, WV ........................................ $200,000

Tannins at Pineville, LA ................................................................................ $100,000

Columbia Gorge economic development grants .............................................. $750,000

Fire protection for Burton/Santini lots at Lake Tahoe ................................. $200,000

Ohio Harbor tree planting, OH ...................................................................... $500,000

Urban Forestry:.

Chicago, IL ............................................................................................. $1,000,000

Ohio Arbor, OH ...................................................................................... $500,000

Tacoma, WA ........................................................................................... $100,000

Bremerton, WA ....................................................................................... $50,000

Port Orchard, WA .................................................................................. $50,000

Atlanta, GA ............................................................................................. $500,000

Northern New Jersey, NJ ...................................................................... $500,000

Chesapeake Bay forest management .............................................................. $150,000

Center for Semi-Arid Agroforestry ................................................................. $200,000

Aerial Fire Depot, Missoula, MT ................................................................... $600,000

Ranger District Office, Helena, MT .............................................................. $650,000

Ranger District Office, Androscoggin, NH .................................................... $1,350,000

Winding Stair NRA, OK ................................................................................ $1,100,000

Oconee National Forest .................................................................................. $1,000,000

Southeast Alaska Visitors Center ................................................................... $2,500,000

Toiyabe National Forest (Kyle Station) ........................................................ $100,000

Monongahela National Forest ........................................................................ $911,000

Timberline Lodge ........................................................................................... $771,000

Multnomah Falls ............................................................................................ $250,000

Green Mountain National Forest ................................................................... $375,000

Kisatchie National Forest storm damage ...................................................... $350,000

White Mountain National Forest ................................................................... $350,000

Timber roads in Dixie National Forest .......................................................... $8,500,000

Recreation roads in Dixie National Forest .................................................... $250,000

1 TITLE VI—TRANSPORTATION

2 APPROPRIATIONS

3 SEC. 601. AIRWAY SCIENCE GRANTS.

4 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

5 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

6 aside for the airway science program; and

7 (2) the amounts were—

8 (A) not specifically authorized;

9 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;
39

•S 1090 IS

1 (C) not the subject of congressional com2 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

3 and

4 (D) first added by the Committee of Con5 ference.

6 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

7 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

8 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap9 propriations made by the Department of Transpor10 tation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,

11 1993 (Pub. L. 102–388; 106 Stat. 1525–1526); and

12 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

13 amounts.

14 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

15 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

16 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5518, House Re17 port 102–924, page 32):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Middle Tennessee State University ................................................................ $556,000

Embry-Ridele University (FL, AL) ................................................................ $11,500,000

Henderson State University (AR) .................................................................. $2,235,000

University of Alaska ....................................................................................... $6,884,000

18 SEC. 602. HIGHWAY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND TECH19 NOLOGY.

20 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
40

•S 1090 IS

1 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

2 aside for highway research, development, and tech3 nology; and

4 (2) the amounts were—

5 (A) not specifically authorized;

6 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

7 (C) not the subject of congressional com8 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

9 and

10 (D) first added by the Committee of Con11 ference.

12 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

13 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

14 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap15 propriations made by the Department of Transpor16 tation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,

17 1993 (Pub. L. 102–388; 106 Stat. 1527); and

18 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

19 amounts.

20 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

21 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

22 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5518, House Re23 port 102–924, page 34):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

University of California (San Diego) research on the use of composite materials in construction ................................................................................. $1,600,000
41

•S 1090 IS

1 SEC. 603. FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS.

2 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

3 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

4 aside for construction and maintenance of Federal5 Aid Highways; and

6 (2) the amounts were—

7 (A) not specifically authorized;

8 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

9 and

10 (C) not the subject of congressional com11 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

12 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

13 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

14 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap15 propriations made by the Department of Transpor16 tation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,

17 1993 (Pub. L. 102–388; 106 Stat. 1529–1531); and

18 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

19 amounts.

20 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

21 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

22 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5518, House Re23 port 102–924, pages 38–40):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Highway Safety and Economic Development Demonstration (MS) .............. $6,400,000

Climbing Lane and Highway Safety Demonstration (PA) ............................ $3,840,000

Kentucky Bridge Demonstration Project ....................................................... $6,400,000
42

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Virginia HOV Safety Demonstration Project ................................................ $1,600,000

Bicycle Transportation Demonstration Project (MI) ..................................... $304,000

Pennsylvania Reconstruction Demonstration Project .................................... $6,400,000

Pennsylvania Toll Road Demonstration Project ............................................ $3,200,000

1 SEC. 604. FEDERAL HIGHWAY DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS.

2 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

3 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

4 aside for Federal Highway Administration dem5 onstration projects; and

6 (2) the demonstration projects were—

7 (A) not specifically authorized;

8 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

9 and

10 (C) not the subject of congressional com11 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

12 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

13 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

14 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap15 propriations made by the Department of Transpor16 tation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,

17 1993 (Pub. L. 102–388; 106 Stat. 1531); and

18 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

19 amounts.

20 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

21 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

22 amounts provided for Federal Highway Administration
43

•S 1090 IS

1 studies (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5518,

2 House Report 102–924, pages 40–41):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Appalachian corridors:.

New York: Corridor ‘‘T’’ ........................................................................ $16,000,000

West Virginia:.

Corridor ‘‘G’’ or ‘‘H’’ ...................................................................... $80,000,000

Corridor ‘‘L’’ ................................................................................... $24,000,000

Sky Harbor Airport Access Road, AZ ............................................................ $6,000,000

Lock and Dam No. 4 Road (Pine Bluff, AR) ................................................ $6,400,000

Highway 156 Bypass (Hollister), CA ............................................................. $960,000

Access Road to Ontario International Airport, CA ........................................ $3,200,000

Florida: Northeast Dade Bikepaths:.

City of North Miami ............................................................................... $400,000

City of North Miami Beach .................................................................... $400,000

Florida U.S. 27 (Palm Beach County) .......................................................... $1,760,000

Biscayne Boulevard/U.S. 1 Connect Port/Miami to I–395, FL ..................... $2,400,000

17th Street tunnel project (Fort Lauderdale) ............................................... $4,912,000

Lake Lanier Access Project, GA .................................................................... $2,624,000

Kihei-Haleakal Highway, HI .......................................................................... $4,000,000

Saddle Road, Island of Hawaii, HI ................................................................ $960,000

U.S. 63 from Waterloo to Minnesota State Border, IA ................................. $3,520,000

5th Street to 6th Street, Waterloo, IA ........................................................... $2,000,000

Des Moines to Burlington Connector, IA ....................................................... $8,000,000

I–65 and State Rt 46 Interchange Project (Columbus), IN .......................... $6,400,000

Muncie State Road 67 (I–69 to Muncie Bypass), IN .................................... $4,992,000

U.S. 54/Kellogg Freeway, KS ........................................................................ $6,160,000

Woodrow Wilson Bridge, MD ......................................................................... $5,000,000

M–84 Bay Road -- Saginaw and Bay Counties, MI ...................................... $100,000

Grand Rapids I–96 Bypass, MI ..................................................................... $768,000

Bristol Road Relocation Project (Flint and Genesse Counties), MI .............. $1,440,000

U.S. 31 (City of Niles and City of Benton Harbor), MI ............................... $320,000

Maple Road Extension, Walled Lake, MI ...................................................... $2,000,000

Multi-Modal Transportation Center, St. Louis, MO ...................................... $640,000

I–90 Interchange, Belgrade, MT .................................................................... $2,000,000

U.S. 64 (East of Jordan Lake to U.S.–64/U.S.–1 Interchange in Cary),

NC .............................................................................................................. $4,640,000

Newcastle Verrillion Bridge, SD .................................................................... $3,296,000

Route 21 widening -- RR/Highway Bridge ‘‘NJ Transit Bridge’’ (Newark),

NJ ............................................................................................................... $1,200,000

I–280 Down Connector (including acquisition for First Street Ramp), NJ . $1,504,000

Route 21 Viaduct Advanced Property Acquisition ......................................... $2,880,000

Airport Access from I–25 (Albuqerque) Sunport Boulevard, NM ................. $4,400,000

I–15 Sahara Avenue Interchange (Las Vegas), NV ...................................... $11,460,000

U.S. 395 Extension from South Virginia to Mt. Rose Highway ................... $2,700,000

I–15 Spring Mountain Interchange (Las Vegas), NV ................................... $6,000,000

Design Improvements on Miller Highway (New York City), NY .................. $1,696,000

Exit 26 Bridge (Mohawk River Valley) (Schenectady County), NY .............. $1,280,000

Pond Creek Road, Grant County, OK ........................................................... $3,360,000

Donora Industrial Park Access Road (Donora--Monessen Bridge/I–70), PA $640,000

U.S. Route 6 Bypass/widening (Wysox, Towanda and Tunkhannock Boroughs), PA .................................................................................................. $1,280,000

U.S. 202 between King of Prussia and Montgomeryville, PA ....................... $1,440,000

I–81 (vicinity of Wilkes-Barre) (Exits 43–46 corridor project), PA ............. $2,880,000

SR 56 Rehabilitation, PA ............................................................................... $9,600,000

Walnut Street/Bluff Furnace Park (Chattanooga), TN ................................ $320,000

U.S.-Mexico Border Highway (Loop 375) (El Paso), TX ............................. $1,600,000

U.S. Route 89 between Farmington and Ogden, UT .................................... $2,400,000

I–15/University Interchange, Provo, UT ....................................................... $4,240,000

Christiansted Bypass (St. Croix), VI ............................................................. $544,000
44

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Snohomish County HOV (Evert and Seattle)/park-n-ride projects

(Lynwood), WA ........................................................................................... $320,000

State Route 509, East-West Corridor project (Port of Tacoma), WA .......... $1,520,000

Scenic Byways Project: U.S. 101 (WA, OR, CA) .......................................... $4,000,000

1 SEC. 605. TRANSIT PLANNING AND RESEARCH.

2 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

3 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

4 aside for transit planning and research; and

5 (2) the amounts were—

6 (A) not specifically authorized;

7 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

8 (C) not the subject of congressional com9 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

10 and

11 (D) first added by the Committee of Con12 ference.

13 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

14 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

15 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap16 propriations made by the Department of Transpor17 tation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,

18 1993 (Pub. L. 102–388; 106 Stat. 1536–1537); and

19 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

20 amounts.

21 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

22 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following
45

•S 1090 IS

1 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5518, House Re2 port 102–924, page 49):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Florida International University and University of South Florida ................ $3,000,000

3 TITLE VII—TREASURY, POSTAL

4 SERVICE, AND GENERAL GOV5 ERNMENT APPROPRIATIONS

6 SEC. 701. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION.

7 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

8 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

9 aside for design and construction grants funded

10 through the Federal Buildings Fund, under the ju11 risdiction of the General Services Administration;

12 and

13 (2) the amounts were—

14 (A) not specifically authorized;

15 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

16 and

17 (C) not the subject of congressional com18 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

19 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

20 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

21 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap22 propriations made by the Treasury, Postal Service,
46

•S 1090 IS

1 and General Government Appropriations Act, 1993

2 (Pub. L. 102–393; 106 Stat. 1744–1745); and

3 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

4 amounts.

5 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

6 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

7 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5488, House Re8 port 102–919, pages 6–7 and 51–53):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Construction of a new parking facility in Newark, New Jersey .................... $9,000,000

Expansion of the Scranton, Pennsylvania Mail Facility ................................ $3,000,000

Centers for Disease Control, site, acquisition, and improvements in Atlanta,

Georgia ....................................................................................................... $26,000,000

For construction of a Center of Disease Control laboratory in Atlanta,

Georgia ....................................................................................................... $30,000,000

For construction of a Center of Disease Control Campus in Atlanta, Georgia ............................................................................................................... $15,000,000

For construction of a new United States Courthouse facility in Brookyn,

New York .................................................................................................... $15,000,000

For a Courthouse in Albany, Georgia ............................................................ $6,000,000

9 SEC. 702. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.

10 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

11 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

12 aside for the establishment of health promotion and

13 disease prevention programs for Federal employees;

14 and

15 (2) the amounts were—

16 (A) not specifically authorized;

17 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

18 and
47

•S 1090 IS

1 (C) not the subject of congressional com2 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

3 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

4 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

5 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap6 propriations made by the Treasury, Postal Service,

7 and General Government Appropriations Act, 1993

8 (Pub. L. 102–393; 106 Stat. 1754–1755); and

9 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

10 amounts.

11 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

12 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

13 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5488, House Re14 port 102–919, page 59):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Expanded efforts for health promotion for federal employees ....................... $1,000,000

15 TITLE VIII—VETERANS AFFAIRS,

16 HOUSING AND URBAN DEVEL17 OPMENT, AND INDEPENDENT

18 AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS

19 Subtitle A—Department of

20 Veterans Affairs

21 SEC. 801. CONSTRUCTION GRANTS.

22 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
48

•S 1090 IS

1 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

2 aside for construction grants; and

3 (2) the amounts were—

4 (A) not specifically authorized;

5 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

6 (C) not the subject of congressional com7 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

8 and

9 (D) first added by the Committee of Con10 ference.

11 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

12 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

13 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap14 propriations made by the Departments of Veterans

15 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and

16 Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993

17 (Pub. L. 102–389; 106 Stat. 1576); and

18 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

19 amounts.

20 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

21 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

22 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5679, House Re23 port 102–902, page 14):
49

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Relocation of the regional office in Jackson, MS ........................................... $16,300,000

Planning and design of a joint project with the College of Medicine for the

relocation of medical school functions and renovation of buildings 2, 3,

and 5 at the Mountain Home, TN, VA Medical Center ............................ $2,800,000

1 Subtitle B—Independent Agencies

2 SEC. 811. EPA—RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.

3 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

4 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

5 aside for research and development; and

6 (2) the amounts were—

7 (A) not specifically authorized;

8 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

9 (C) not the subject of congressional com10 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

11 and

12 (D) first added by the Committee of Con13 ference.

14 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

15 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

16 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap17 propriations made by the Departments of Veterans

18 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and

19 Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993

20 (Pub. L. 102–389; 106 Stat. 1596); and

21 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

22 amounts.
50

•S 1090 IS

1 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

2 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

3 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5679, House Re4 port 102–902, pages 41–43):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Adirondack Destruction Assessment Program ............................................... $500,000

Center for Environmental Management ......................................................... $3,200,000

National Academy of Sciences study of wetlands .......................................... $400,000

American Water Works Association Research Foundation ............................ $575,000

Southeast Environmental Research Center .................................................... $2,000,000

Center for Excellence in Polymer Research and Environmental Study ......... $1,200,000

Nutrient loading research project in Boston Harbor and Massachusetts

Bay. These funds should be allocated to the Naragansett Laboratory ...... $400,000

Interagency coordination of Great Lakes ....................................................... $125,000

Water Environment Research Foundation ..................................................... $700,000

Energy and Environmental Research Center at the University of North

Dakota for a cradle-to-grave assessment and control technology development program for toxic metal emissions .................................................... $1,600,000

Recycling and reuse technology development project at the Iowa Waste Reduction Center ............................................................................................ $700,000

Urban waste management research at the University of New Orleans ......... $700,000

National ultraviolet monitoring center, a national program to monitor the

ultraviolet flux reaching the Earth’s surface. The monitoring center is to

be established at the University of Georgia, Athens, GA ........................... $700,000

Pollution prevention research and development center at the University of

Connecticut ................................................................................................. $1,450,000

Center for Analysis of Environmental Change to provide comprehensive approaches needed for wise management of the Columbia and Snake Rivers

ecosystem resources .................................................................................... $250,000

5 SEC. 812. EPA—ABATEMENT, CONTROL, AND COMPLIANCE.

6 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

7 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

8 aside for abatement, control, and compliance; and

9 (2) the amounts were—

10 (A) not specifically authorized;

11 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

12 (C) not the subject of congressional com13 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

14 and
51

•S 1090 IS

1 (D) first added by the Committee of Con2 ference.

3 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

4 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

5 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap6 propriations made by the Departments of Veterans

7 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and

8 Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993

9 (Pub. L. 102–389; 106 Stat. 1596–1597); and

10 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

11 amounts.

12 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

13 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

14 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5679, House Re15 port 102–902, pages 44–47):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Alternative fuels demonstration project in the South Coast Air Quality

Management District .................................................................................. $600,000

National Rural Water Association ................................................................. $3,300,000

NRWA’s groundwater protection program .................................................... $1,000,000

Indian multimedia grants ............................................................................... $1,000,000

National High Altitude Center ....................................................................... $350,000

Documentary of the Hudson River Highlands ............................................... $210,000

Tar-Pamlico River Basin nonpoint source demonstration and watershed

pilot program .............................................................................................. $350,000

EPA’s environmental statistics initiative ....................................................... $750,000

Cleanup of contaminated sediments in the Buffalo River ............................. $800,000

Continued work on the Maumee River and Bay basinwide assessment of

hazardous waste sites ................................................................................. $1,250,000

Saginaw River Watershed .............................................................................. $1,000,000

Underground injection control program ......................................................... $200,000

Continued work on the Spokane aquifer ........................................................ $1,000,000

EPA’s Region V Lake/Watershed management plan ..................................... $850,000

Wetlands mitigation bank prototype in Warrenton, OR ................................ $150,000

Wetlands demonstration project on the Susquehanna River in Northeastern

Pennsylvania ............................................................................................... $700,000

Wetlands study of the McKenzie River Basin ............................................... $600,000

Conduct a groundwater study of the Calumet Lake Region .......................... $200,000

Hayward Marsh Wetlands restoration ........................................................... $750,000
52

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Innovative and alternative wastewater treatment demonstration project in

the Florida Keys ......................................................................................... $500,000

Methane Energy and Agriculture Development Program .............................. $750,000

Pilot project on microsale chemistry techniques to support innovative research in pollution prevention .................................................................... $250,000

Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization for additional

training for minority and women contractors ............................................ $50,000

Canaan Valley, West Virginia, wetlands complex .......................................... $250,000

Diary pollution research ................................................................................. $550,000

Lake water quality activities by the State of New Jersey, including activities at Strawbridge Lake, and continuing work at Lake Musconetcong

and Alcyon Lake, or other lakes the State deems appropriate. This sum

should be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other Federal assistance $550,000

St. Croix River International Waterway Commission .................................... $100,000

Oyster reseeding in the Chesapeake Bay ....................................................... $1,000,000

Lake Pontchartrain water quality improvements ........................................... $3,800,000

Northwest Indian tribes for coordinated and cooperative environmental protection approaches ...................................................................................... $2,500,000

Multimedia project funding to be utilized by the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona to continue to meet solid waste needs assessment and planning requirements of the Arizona tribes ................................................................ $1,000,000

High Altitude In-Use Compliance Center ...................................................... $200,000

National demonstration project of onsite wastewater treatment technologies

and management systems ........................................................................... $1,500,000

Small Towns Environment Program to aid small communities in new approaches to design and construct water and wastewater systems ............. $700,000

Small business pollution prevention demonstraiton program in New Jersey $450,000

Investigate the causes and develop potential solutions to the algal bloom

crisis in West Maui ..................................................................................... $400,000

Continuation of a nonpoint source pollution study in Nebraska, Iowa, and

Kansas to study the origins and migrations of nonpoint source pollution,

using advanced land-imaging techniques .................................................... $1,500,000

Restore Decker Lake in West Valley City, UT .............................................. $1,000,000

Cleanup of Black Hawk Lake near Wall Lake, IA ........................................ $400,000

Integrated pollution prevention initiative at the New Jersey Institute of

Technology .................................................................................................. $2,000,000

Northeast States for coordinated air use management for interstate pollution control and ozone reduction ................................................................ $300,000

Association of State and Interstate Water Pollution Control Administrators

(conference) ................................................................................................ $400,000

Grand River Basin nonpoint source pollution program ................................. $400,000

Consortium for International Earth Science Information Network

(CIESIN) (conference) ............................................................................... $4,000,000

1 SEC. 813. EPA—BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES.

2 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

3 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

4 aside for buildings and facilities; and

5 (2) the amounts were—

6 (A) not specifically authorized;
53

•S 1090 IS

1 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

2 and

3 (C) not the subject of congressional com4 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

5 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

6 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

7 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap8 propriations made by the Departments of Veterans

9 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and

10 Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993

11 (Pub. L. 102–389; 106 Stat. 1598–1599); and

12 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

13 amounts.

14 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

15 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

16 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5679, House Re17 port 102–902, pages 51–55):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Environmental Health Science Research Center at Columbia University ..... $10,000,000

Grant for the Christopher Columbus Center of Marine Research and Exploration .......................................................................................................... $12,500,000

Grant for the Maine Quarternary Studies Institute ...................................... $1,000,000

Grant to the University of Utah for an Intermountain Regional Network

and Scientific Computation Center ............................................................ $5,000,000

For a research program in cooperation with the Association of Minority

Health Professions Schools. ....................................................................... $4,000,000

For a study of human health impacts of contaminated fish .......................... $3,000,000

For chemical sensitivity/low level chemical and environmental exposure

workshops ................................................................................................... $250,000

For a PCB exposure study in Monroe County, IN ........................................ $250,000

For the Lipari information network ............................................................... $50,000

For NIEHS worker training grants ............................................................... $20,000,000

For NIEHS basic research grants ................................................................. $20,000,000

For the Gulf Coast Hazardous Substance Research Center .......................... $2,500,000

For Clark Atlanta University Hazardous Substance Research Center ......... $3,000,000

For the SITE program to develop the Mine Waste Pilot Program ............... $2,500,000
54

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

For a grant to the Ocean County Utilities Authority, in the State of New

Jersey, for necessary modifications and replacements to the CarverGreenfield sewage treatment plant ............................................................. $19,000,000

For a grant for necessary work to remove and reroute existing sewer lines

at the Centennial Olympic site in the City of Atlanta, GA ........................ $7,000,000

For a grant to the State of Arizona for an interceptor/collection system in

the City of Avondale, AZ ............................................................................ $10,000,000

1 SEC. 814. OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY.

2 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

3 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

4 aside for activities associated with CIESIN; and

5 (2) the amounts were—

6 (A) not specifically authorized;

7 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

8 (C) not the subject of congressional com9 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

10 and

11 (D) first added by the Committee of Con12 ference.

13 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

14 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

15 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap16 propriations made by the Departments of Veterans

17 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and

18 Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993

19 (Pub. L. 102–389; 106 Stat. 1604); and
55

•S 1090 IS

1 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

2 amounts.

3 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

4 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

5 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5679, House Re6 port 102–902, page 60):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

For activities associated with the Consortium for International Earth

Science Information Network (CIESIN) .................................................... $2,000,000

7 SEC. 815. NASA—RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.

8 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

9 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

10 aside for research and development; and

11 (2) the amounts were—

12 (A) not specifically authorized;

13 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

14 and

15 (C) not the subject of congressional com16 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

17 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

18 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

19 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap20 propriations made by the Departments of Veterans

21 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and
56

•S 1090 IS

1 Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993

2 (Pub. L. 102–389; 106 Stat. 1608–1609); and

3 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

4 amounts.

5 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

6 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

7 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5679, House Re8 port 102–902, pages 66–71):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

For the Consortium for International Earth Science Information Network

(CIESIN) .................................................................................................... $20,000,000

For the National Technology Transfer Center, Wheeling Jesuit College,

Wheeling, WV ............................................................................................. $4,400,000

For AdaNet .................................................................................................... $2,100,000

For the Nebraska Department of Education to expand the NASA Teacher

Resource Center at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln ....................... $400,000

For the Classroom of the Future, WV ........................................................... $2,800,000

For the Oregon system of higher education for computer network infrastructure for advanced technology research and education projects .......... $4,500,000

For distance learning activities at the Marine Science Center at Oregon

State University .......................................................................................... $500,000

For the University of Utah Intermountain Network and Scientific Computation Center ........................................................................................... $10,000,000

For expansion of the capacity for informal science education activities at

the Cosmosphere at Hutchinson, Kansas ................................................... $4,000,000

9 SEC. 816. NASA—CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES.

10 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

11 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c) are set

12 aside for construction of facilities; and

13 (2) the amounts were—

14 (A) not specifically authorized;

15 (B) not awarded on a competitive basis;

16 and
57

•S 1090 IS

1 (C) not the subject of congressional com2 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings.

3 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

4 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

5 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap6 propriations made by the Departments of Veterans

7 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and

8 Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993

9 (Pub. L. 102–389; 106 Stat. 1609); and

10 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

11 amounts.

12 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

13 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

14 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5679, House Re15 port 102–902, page 70):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

For a Consortium for International Earth Science International Earth

Science Information Network (CIESIN) facility ........................................ $42,000,000

For constructing, equipping, and furnishing the Delta College science

learning center and planetarium ................................................................ $8,000,000

16 Subtitle C—Department of Housing

17 and Urban Development

18 SEC. 821. SPECIAL PURPOSE GRANTS.

19 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—
58

•S 1090 IS

1 (1) the grants listed in subsection (c) are ‘‘Spe2 cial Purpose Grants’’ funded under Annual Con3 tributions for Assisted Housing;

4 (2) until the enactment of the Department of

5 Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of

6 1989 (12 U.S.C. 1701q–1), Special Purpose Grants

7 were funded by the Secretary of Housing and Urban

8 Development’s discretionary fund under section 107

9 of the Housing and Community Development Act of

10 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5307);

11 (3) the Department of Housing and Urban De12 velopment Reform Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 1701q–

13 1) eliminated the use of the Secretary’s discretionary

14 fund for Special Purpose Grants;

15 (4) Congress continues to fund Special Purpose

16 Grants through Annual Contributions to Assisted

17 Housing, in violation of the spirit of the Department

18 of Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of

19 1989 (12 U.S.C. 1701q–1); and

20 (5) the grants listed in subsection (c) were—

21 (A) not specifically authorized;

22 (B) not the subject of congressional com23 mittee or subcommittee authorization hearings;

24 (C) not awarded on a competitive basis;

25 and
59

•S 1090 IS

1 (D) first added by the Committee of Con2 ference, in the case of the item listed in sub3 section (c) relating to economic development in

4 the county of Aroostook, Maine, and the city of

5 Presque Isle, Maine, and all subsequent items.

6 (b) RESCISSION.—There are rescinded—

7 (1) the amounts listed in subsection (c), which

8 were set aside or otherwise made available out of ap9 propriations made by the Departments of Veterans

10 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and

11 Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993

12 (Pub. L. 102–389; 106 Stat. 1571); and

13 (2) the underlying appropriations for the

14 amounts.

15 (c) AMOUNTS.—Except to the extent obligated, the

16 amounts rescinded by subsection (b) are the following

17 (Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5679, House Re18 port 102–902):

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Tacoma, WA job opportunity and neighborhood revitalization project ......... $1,500,000

Seattle community action capitol project for social services and working

capital to assist four areas in Seattle, WA ................................................ $1,350,000

North East Community Center Association in Spokane, WA ....................... $150,000

City of Santa Fe, NM for infrastructure development connected with the

Tierra Contenta Affordable Housing program ........................................... $1,500,000

Facility for the Roadrunner Food Bank in Albuquerque, NM ...................... $1,000,000

Wayne Miner homeownership project in Kansas City, MO ........................... $1,700,000

Multi-purpose social services center for at-risk children, youth and adults

in Springfield, MO ...................................................................................... $300,000

Water tower for the Joplin Industrial Park in Joplin, MO ........................... $250,000

Expansion of the Swope Parkway Health Center in Kansas City, MO ......... $3,000,000

Day care center for low-income residents at the Wherry complex in Pine

Lawn, MO ................................................................................................... $450,000

To the city of Tulsa, OK for the Kendall-Whittier neighborhood demonstration program ............................................................................................... $750,000
60

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

To the city of Oklahoma City, OK for infrastructure needs in conjunction

with the Oklahoma School of Science and Mathematics ............................ $2,750,000

City of Enid, OK for providing educational opportunities through the Enid

Economic Development Authority .............................................................. $500,000

Continued rehabilitation of the Windsor Park neighborhood in North Las

Vegas, Nevada ............................................................................................ $1,000,000

Economic development and natural resources infrastructure repair along

the Atlantic coast of New Jersey ............................................................... $1,000,000

Lead-paint demonstration project in the City of Newark, New Jersey ......... $1,500,000

Arkansas Enterprise Group to create a wood products modernization and

market development fund ........................................................................... $250,000

Community-based health insurance program in two rural communities in

the Mississippi River delta region of Arkansas .......................................... $1,000,000

Manufacturing incubator facility in North Dakota to develop emerging

technologies that generate business in rural areas .................................... $1,500,000

Infrastructure improvements in low-income housing in Grand Forks, ND ... $1,000,000

Construction of a new public health facility in Merced County, CA ............. $1,000,000

Infrastructure demolition and repair in Richardson Bay in the Marin

County, California area .............................................................................. $2,500,000

Creation of business outreach centers sponsored by the Council of Jewish

Organizations in New York ........................................................................ $1,000,000

Acquisition and renovation of two facilities that serve developmentally disabled children to be run by the Hebrew Academy for Special Children in

New York .................................................................................................... $2,000,000

Expansion of non-profit neighborhood social service centers run by the

Greater Rochester Foundation in Rochester, NY ...................................... $2,000,000

Low-income housing in the Village of Kaiser, NY ......................................... $500,000

Erie County Industrial Development Agency for an advanced training center in Erie County, NY ............................................................................... $500,000

Renovation of the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit at the Children’s Hospital

of Buffalo, NY ............................................................................................ $2,000,000

Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc., an Arizona state non-profit organization, for

a new housing initiative to leverage the purchase of RTC properties and

to provide technical assistance to other non-profit groups to participate

in this program ........................................................................................... $300,000

Bethel New Life, Inc. in Chicago, IL for adapting a hospital complex into a

facility that provides housing, health care and community social services

to a distressed area of Chicago .................................................................. $250,000

Children’s health care project in Hartford, CT ............................................. $2,000,000

Old State House project in Hartford, CT ...................................................... $3,000,000

Infrastructure improvements in the Planeview area of Wichita, Kansas ...... $1,200,000

City of Topeka, KS to acquire and renovate an abandoned facility as a law

enforcement facility .................................................................................... $1,000,000

Cypress Drug and Alcohol Recovery program in Olathe, KS ........................ $250,000

Wichita Children’s Home in Wichita, KS ...................................................... $500,000

Job training and placement activities for disadvantaged and

underrepresented youth at the America-First Printing Center in Atlanta,

GA ............................................................................................................... $250,000

Restoration of the Liberty Theater in Columbus, GA in conjunction with

the city’s 5th and 6th Avenue Area Redevelopment Plan .......................... $1,000,000

Restoration of the Lucas Theater in Savannah, Georgia’s historic district,

as part of the city’s urban revitalization plan ............................................ $1,000,000

King Center in Atlanta, GA for activities to combat poverty, racism and violence, including technical assistance, direct grants and community capacity-building activities ............................................................................. $2,100,000

Land acquisition by the city of Vienna, GA in conjunction with an economic development project that involves a new poultry processing facility $900,000

River Park Residential Development project in Salt Lake City, UT ............ $2,200,000

Creation of a West Salt Lake City Affordable Housing Enhancement fund

in Salt Lake City, UT ................................................................................ $1,700,000

Utah Technology Finance Corporation .......................................................... $500,000

Utah Fund for Rural Development ................................................................ $250,000

Provo City, UT and Utah County, UT women and children shelter for

transitional housing for abused spouses and their children ....................... $500,000
61

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Provo City, UT and Utah County, UT Franklin neighborhood preservation

and homeownership program ...................................................................... $350,000

Midvale City Housing and Economic Development agency for activities connected with the Sharon Steel superfund site in Midvale, UT .................... $350,000

Housing rehabilitation and revitalization in Ogden, UT ............................... $800,000

To the City of Cleveland to implement the plan of the Cleveland Foundation’s Commission on Poverty to combat persistent poverty ..................... $1,500,000

Infrastructure to connect the Alliance Community Hospital and an on-site

nursing home in Alliance, OH .................................................................... $1,250,000

Individual home acquisition program run by the Iowa Finance Authority ... $1,500,000

Neighborhood improvement in the Hilltop section of Davenport, IA ............ $1,000,000

Dismantling, environmental cleanup and upgrading of the Gra-Iron Foundry in Marshalltown, IA ............................................................................... $200,000

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Battered Persons Advocacy project in Roseburg, OR .................................... $100,000

Job training for displaced timber workers and fishermen in Oregon ............ $2,500,000

Approximately 89 units of single-room occupancy housing to help with displacement of individuals resulting from the construction of a federal

courthouse in Portland, OR ........................................................................ $2,200,000

Water, sewer, housing rehabilitation and community improvements in the

Arthurtown, Taylors, and Little Camden Communities in Richland County, SC .......................................................................................................... $3,000,000

Day care and head start facilities in conjunction with an affordable housing

project in Beaufort County, SC .................................................................. $500,000

Improvement of existing social service and public health facilities in Fairfield County, SC ......................................................................................... $1,000,000

Continued infrastructure development in the Hawaiian Home Lands .......... $1,200,000

Continued assistance to two sugarcane mills on Hilo-Hamakua Coast of

Hawaii ......................................................................................................... $1,300,000

New affordable housing initiatives in Hawaii, including a women’s shelter

in the Maui County, additional housing initiatives in Kauai County, and

site acquisition and development for use as assisted housing development

run by non-profit groups in the City and County of Honolulu .................. $2,900,000

Small business loan project run by the City of New Orleans, LA ................. $250,000

Housing and comprehensive services for homeless women and their families

at the ‘‘My House’’ project in New Orleans, LA ....................................... $350,000

Continuation of activities in the City of New Orleans, LA to provide job

training, education, and functional skills to at risk residents of public

housing, in conjunction with Loyola University ......................................... $5,000,000

Project Hope in Milwaukee, WI for low-income homeownership counseling

and drug education activities ...................................................................... $750,000

Wisconsin small business development center ................................................ $1,000,000

University/neighborhood crime intervention demonstration program at Milwaukee, WI ................................................................................................. $650,000

Regional demonstration center for advanced care for the elderly at the New

England Deaconness Hospital in Boston, MA ........................................... $5,000,000

Expansion of the Gateway project at the Omaha Nebraska Housing Authority in Omaha, NE ................................................................................ $600,000

Mercade Economic Development Project in South Omaha, NE .................... $200,000

Renovation and equipment for the expansion of the rural health education

network in Kearney, NE ............................................................................ $900,000

Expansion of the Panhandle Community Health Center in Scottsbluff, NE $900,000

Cathedral Health Care System’s Women’s and Children’s Service Network

for construction, renovation, site work and medical equipment in Newark, NJ ....................................................................................................... $4,500,000

New Jersey Institute of Technology to continue the test of affordable housing technologies .......................................................................................... $300,000

Development of an outdoor learning facility for disabled children in

Willingsboro, NJ ......................................................................................... $150,000

Renovation of three senior centers in Atlantic County, NJ ........................... $300,000
62

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Comprehensive economic development activities in Penns Grove, NJ ........... $400,000

Hammonton Revitalization Corporation of Hammonton, NJ to revitalize

Hammonton’s central business district ...................................................... $400,000

Site clearance and design work on the Newark/University Heights Science

Park in Newark, NJ ................................................................................... $1,500,000

Economic revitalization and infrastructure repair in the following Vermont

communities: Montpelier, $1,250,000; Randolph, $1,000,000; and Hardwick, $750,000 ........................................................................................... $3,000,000

Vermont Housing and Conservation Board to assist in constructing or rehabilitating up to seven affordable housing projects located in up to six

Vermont communities ................................................................................. $2,000,000

Five following existing economic development revolving loan funds in Vermont, for loan activity for startup, expansion and improvement of small

business development, to be divided evenly among the five funds in

$300,000 increments: the Vermont Job Start Program; the Transition

Fund of the Economic Development Council of Northern Vermont; the

Small Entrepreneurial Loan Fund of the Northern Community Investment Corporation; the Town of Hartford Business Revolving Loan Fund;

and the Town of Bennington Revolving Loan Fund .................................. $1,500,000

Renovation of the Eddystone Center as a center for homeless veterans in

Detroit, MI ................................................................................................. $1,800,000

Infrastructure improvements for the City of Albion, MI ............................... $900,000

Community stabilization and revitalization project in Flint, MI ................... $800,000

Health care and social service facility for the citizens of central Mississippi

and the Mississippi Delta region ................................................................ $6,000,000

To the Kentucky Highlands Investment Corporation for economic development activities in McCeary County, KY ..................................................... $200,000

To the Mountain Association for Community Economic Development for

the development of flexible manufacturing networks in eastern Kentucky $250,000

Development of a technology-based business information center in Manchester, NH ................................................................................................ $1,000,000

Program planning and development of a model community-based rural

health network headquartered at the Carolinas Medical Center in Charlotte, NC ..................................................................................................... $3,000,000

Expansion of Uplift, Inc. and for the development of statewide activities

and services for at-risk children and families in North Carolina ............... $300,000

Activities of the Eastern North Carolina Poverty Committee to expand affordable housing opportunities for rural residents of Eastern North

Carolina ...................................................................................................... $200,000

Construction of a regional fire training center and related equipment in

Clinton, TN ................................................................................................ $1,000,000

Renovation and development of the Lehigh Park community service center

in Philadelphia, PA .................................................................................... $1,000,000

To provide grants and technical assistance to community development corporations through the Philadelphia Development Partnerships to develop

affordable housing in Philadelphia, PA ...................................................... $500,000

To Genesis II, Inc., in Philadelphia, PA for renovation of a residential drug

treatment facility ........................................................................................ $750,000

Community facilities in Nanty Glo, PA ......................................................... $75,000

Community facilities in Garrett, PA .............................................................. $50,000

Construction of a child development center in Buckhannon, WV ................. $3,200,000

Continued renovation of an abandoned building to convert into an economic

development and training facility in Elkins, WV ....................................... $700,000

An addition to a local fire and emergency rescue facility in McDowell

County, WV ................................................................................................ $100,000

Development of an integrated community center and health clinic through

the use of an abandoned facility in Shepherdstown, WV ........................... $500,000

Construction of an ambulatory care center and health science library in

Hinington, WV ........................................................................................... $4,500,000

Construction of a science and technology facility to provide training, advanced technology, and electronic computational capability in

Shepherdstown, WV .................................................................................... $4,000,000
63

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

To complete construction of the Mid-Atlantic Aviation and Training Center

near Clarksburg, WV .................................................................................. $1,800,000

Construction of a facility for the Mountaineer Food Bank in Gassaway,

WV .............................................................................................................. $950,000

Thunder Child Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Center near Sheridan, WY ...................................................................................................... $1,000,000

To the Community Enterprise Development Corporation of Alaska to promote economic development in Alaska Native villages through the development and marketing of native prototype products and their production

components ................................................................................................. $350,000

Downtown economic development activities in Sioux Falls, SD .................... $100,000

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Economic development project, including environmental cleanup, pollution

abatement, and job retention and creation activities, in the county of

Arostook, ME and the city of Presque Isle, ME ........................................ $2,275,000

To continue the Neighborhood Development Demonstration ........................ $2,000,000

To Lowell, MA, to demolish and/or rehabilitate abandoned properties to

combat arson, gangs, and drugs ................................................................. $1,000,000

To Lawrence, MA, to demolish and/or rehabilitate abandoned properties to

combat arson, gangs, and drugs; and for computer hardware for City

hall to assess arson damage ....................................................................... $1,200,000

To Methuen, MA, for public safety equipment and to purchase and rehabilitate vacant property for use as a human services center ...................... $650,000

To relocate, renovate and expand the Middlesex Shelter homeless facility in

Lowell, Massachusetts ................................................................................ $650,000

To Oregon City, Oregon, for an economic development project, including

site acquisition, wetlands restoration, and final design and planning for a

western frontier-Oregon Territory historical center ................................... $3,000,000

Restoration and renovation of the Lamar and Pickens County, Alabama,

courthouses ................................................................................................. $1,500,000

Freedom Ranch in Blount County, Alabama, to provide housing for homeless and abused children ............................................................................. $500,000

To Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to establish the Institute for the Advancement of Mathematics and Science Teaching .............................................. $2,500,000

To the Philadelphia (PA) Regional Port Authority for revitalization of the

Tioga Marine Terminal .............................................................................. $1,000,000

Southwest Development Financing, Inc. to capitalize a revolving loan fund

to encourage economic development and tourism in Southwest Virginia .. $1,000,000

To the Ark-Tex Council of Governments, located in Bowie County, TX, for

infrastructure, community or economic development activities .................. $1,500,000

To the East Texas Council of Governments, located in Kilgore, TX, for infrastructure, community or economic development activities in Wood,

Camp, Gregg, Harrison, Marion, Rusk, Upshur, or Panola counties ........ $500,000

Child development center and social service facility in Longview, TX .......... $400,000

Expansion, equipment and infrastructure associated with the Rusk County

Exposition Center in Rusk County, TX ..................................................... $250,000

To the Upshur County Civic Improvement Foundation, located in Upshur

County, TX, for community development activities ................................... $850,000

Renovation of an industrial building for Focus: HOPE Center for Advanced Technologies in Detroit, MI ........................................................... $2,900,000

Central Norristown redevelopment project in PA .......................................... $400,000

To the City of Mackinac Island, MI, to restore historic buildings and for

other municipal purposes ............................................................................ $1,900,000

Establishment of a Wellness Institute by Marquette General Hospital, in

Marquette, MI ............................................................................................ $480,000

To Enterprise Development, Inc. of Columbia, SC, for a video conferencing

and training facility .................................................................................... $1,500,000

To the Bay County Building Authority in Bay County, MI, for a conference center and for other municipal purposes ....................................... $5,900,000
64

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

Housing rehabilitation and for creating employment opportunities in the

Eastside Neighborhood in Tacoma, WA .................................................... $500,000

To Los Angeles, CA, for the East Los Angeles Community Union for commercial redevelopment activities ................................................................. $1,750,000

To Los Angeles, CA, for a loan fund to be administered by a nonprofit

community organization in support of small business revitalization that

will create a beneficial impact on employment, income, savings, and the

development of a stronger community economic base in South Central

Los Angeles ................................................................................................ $1,750,000

To the City of San Jose, CA, for the Mexican Heritage Plaza and Gardens

project ......................................................................................................... $1,000,000

To develop a business incubator program in the Rio Linda/North Highlands area of California, to provide job training and start-up business assistance to low-income residents in those areas ......................................... $500,000

Dixon, CA, sewer plant expansion to bring the sewage treatment facility

into compliance, which will help reduce housing costs for low and moderate income families .................................................................................. $500,000

To West Sacramento, CA, for the Margaret McDowell Senior Center

project ......................................................................................................... $500,000

Washington State University Affordable Housing program .......................... $200,000

Handicapped access project at the Spokane Marketplace in Spokane, WA. . $200,000

To Agri-Technics International, of Pullman, WA, for rural economic development activities. ........................................................................................ $150,000

Handicapped access projects in three rural areas: $84,000 at Preston Hall,

Waitsburg, WA; $7,000 for City Hall, Starbuck, WA; and $30,000 for

the North County (Cutter) Theater, Metaline Falls, WA. ......................... $121,000

Walla Walla Small Business Center program in Walla Walla County, WA. . $77,000

Spokane (WA) Food Bank to purchase a warehouse. ................................... $500,000

Migrant farmerworkers’ housing in Hillsborough County, FL. ..................... $2,200,000

To Murfreesboro, TN, to renovate the Bradley Academy for a multi-purpose community/cultural/heritage and civic center. .................................... $480,000

Community development in Astoria, NY. ....................................................... $1,500,000

People’s Firehouse, Inc. for community development activities in Brooklyn,

NY. ............................................................................................................. $1,000,000

Hispanic Information and Telecommunications Corporation in New York,

NY. ............................................................................................................. $500,000

Storm water drainage improvements in Smallwood Village in Charles County, MD. ....................................................................................................... $225,000

Opportunity Park, in Bowie, MD. .................................................................. $200,000

Rehabilitation of facilities in the Nanjemoy community in Charles County,

MD. ............................................................................................................. $500,000

Restoration of a well under the jurisdiction of the Potomac Heights Home

Owners Association in western Charles County, MD. ................................ $125,000

To Tulsa, OK, for the Kendall-Whittier neighborhood revitalization and

stabilization demonstration project. ........................................................... $1,000,000

To Nanticoke, PA, for infrastructure and economic development activities. . $1,800,000

To the City of Toledo, OH, to create a strong community anchor in the

heart of the downtown, concentrating on restoring the Toledo Farmers’

Market and helping rehabilitate the nearby abandoned Portside Marketplace. ........................................................................................................... $2,000,000

To the City of Toledo, OH, to work in conjunction with the Toledo Area

Transit Authority and other agencies to renovate Central Union Terminal through abandoned building demolition and site improvements. ......... $1,000,000

To the City of Oregon, OH, for completion of a sanitary sewer system serving the city and the adjacent unincorporated village of Harbor View. ...... $500,000

Relocation of the Camillus House shelter and medical clinic in Miami, FL. $2,000,000

Emergency repair and restoration of the water supply system for the City

of Landers, CA. .......................................................................................... $3,800,000

Permanent restoration of public buildings and equipment in the Big Bear

area of San Bernardino County, CA. ......................................................... $2,750,000

Project Access programs of the Green Hills Rural Development Corporation in Trenton, Missouri, and the Northwest Missouri Regional Development Corporation in Maryville, Missouri. ................................................... $800,000
65

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

To continue the economic development activities of the Redwood Region

Economic Development Commission in Humboldt County, CA. ................ $850,000

South Chandler housing and community redevelopment in Chandler, Arizona. ............................................................................................................ $1,000,000

Construction and public improvements near Crestline in San Bernardino

County, CA. ................................................................................................ $375,000

Downtown renovation and the revitalization of central city recreation infrastructure serving low- and moderate-income citizens in Lewiston, Maine. $1,150,000

Infrastructure improvements related to the construction of low- and moderate-income housing in Ames, Iowa. ......................................................... $950,000

Casa Pacifica shelter care facility in Ventura County, CA. ........................... $960,000

An economic development project based at the Indian Hills Community

College in Ottuma, Iowa. ............................................................................ $400,000

To construct a new facility for the Boys and Girls Club of San Marcos, CA. $500,000

Facility costs for the Boys and Girls Club of Escondido, CA. ...................... $375,000

Equipment for Children’s Hospital and Health Center of San Diego, CA. ... $1,375,000

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

To the Mesa Grande Indian Tribe of San Diego County, CA, for a manufacturing plant for factory-built wood frame structures ............................ $1,250,000

Drug elimination demonstration program at a state-owned public housing

complex known as Levister Towers in Mount Vernon, NY ........................ $1,000,000

Construction of a senior center in the Town of Smithfield, RI ..................... $600,000

To Newburyport, MA, for renovation/addition to police facilities .................. $1,300,000

Monroe County, PA, Housing Authority to rehabilitate a low-income elderly

and disabled housing project ...................................................................... $700,000

Lackawanna Junior College, Scranton, PA, to establish the National Career Prep and Distance Training Center for low-income and public housing residents ............................................................................................... $1,800,000

Feasibility study on infrastructure improvements needed for the economic

development of the Peoria, Illinois, area .................................................... $1,500,000

Capital repairs to the facilities operated by Federated Dorchester Neighborhood Houses, Inc. in Dorchester, MA ................................................... $2,000,000

To the West Virginia High-Technology Consortium for a high-technology

incubator facility in Marion County, WV, to promote emerging technologies in rural areas ................................................................................ $1,000,000

To the City of Wheeling, WV, for educational and recreational opportunities for at-risk youth and the acquisition and renovation of dilapidated

housing ........................................................................................................ $600,000

To the City of Morgantown, WV, for downtown renewal and revitalization

activities ...................................................................................................... $1,000,000

To Arthurdale Heritage, Inc., for needed revitalization and infrastructure

improvements to the Community of Arthurdale, WV ................................ $500,000

City of Mannington, WV, to rehabilitate arson damaged areas and for

other revitalization projects within the Mannington district ...................... $400,000

Victory Housing, Inc., to build Bartholomew House, a facility for the frail

elderly, in Montgomery County, MD .......................................................... $1,500,000

Facility improvements at the Laurel Mountain Recreation Area in

Ligonier, PA ............................................................................................... $1,300,000

Renovation of Point Stadium in Johnstown, PA ........................................... $1,360,000

To renovate Perry School in Washington, DC, into a multi-purpose service

center designed to meet the poverty-related needs of the community ....... $1,000,000

Temporary shelter for families while their homes are undergoing lead-based

paint abatement in Newark, NJ ................................................................. $1,500,000

To establish a center for Pacific Rim Studies at the University of San

Francisco, CA ............................................................................................. $1,500,000

North Carolina Housing Trust Fund ............................................................. $1,000,000

To New York City, NY, for New York City Medical College to improve

health care delivery in the city ................................................................... $2,000,000

Clayton Housing Authority’s (New Mexico) comprehensive improvement

project ......................................................................................................... $500,000
66

•S 1090 IS

Program, project, or activity: Amount of

rescission:

To the City of Elkhart, Indiana, to establish an Elkhart Entrepreneur’s

Revolving Loan Fund ................................................................................. $900,000

To the City of Chicago’s (IL) Low-Income Housing Trust Fund ................. $1,300,000

Expansion of the Salesian Boys and Girls Club in East Los Angeles, CA ... $500,000

To Cibola County, NM, for a multi-agency visitor center to provide economic benefits for the western part of New Mexico ................................... $1,500,000

To the Bay Area Foundation in Bay City, MI, for municipal infrastructure,

economic development, and other municipal purposes ............................... $2,747,000

Community Development Resource Center in western Monroe County, NY,

at Roberts Wesleyan College ...................................................................... $2,000,000

Renovation of facilities in the Adirondack Destruction Assessment Program

in NY .......................................................................................................... $1,500,000

To develop a training program in East Cleveland (OH) for single mothers

to enable them to be economically self sufficient ....................................... $2,000,000

Hitchcock Center in Cleveland, OH, for assistance to women who are substance abusers ............................................................................................. $1,000,000

To Michigan State University for continuation of an urban extension program ............................................................................................................ $300,000

Bellefaire Residential Treatment Center for Children in Cleveland, OH, for

renovation activities and to enhance special service needs ......................... $2,000,000

Katheryn Tyler Multi-Purpose Family Center in Cleveland, OH .................. $1,000,000

Urban redevelopment and small business development project in Kalamazoo, MI ................................................................................................... $650,000

Redevelopment of the Broadway Corridor project in Gary, IN ..................... $1,500,000

To the City of Chicago (IL) for non-profit counseling organizations for a

prepurchase and foreclosure-prevention counseling demonstration program ............................................................................................................ $900,000

New Directions project for homeless veterans in Los Angeles, CA ............... $1,500,000

City of Chicago’s (IL) Preservation Predevelopment Program ..................... $1,300,000

1 TITLE IX—BLUE SMOKE AND

2 MIRRORS

3 SEC. 901. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.

4 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that the tactic

5 of delaying obligations in the appropriations process is an

6 irresponsible budgeting technique which will only serve to

7 exacerbate the budget deficit and the national debt.

8 (b) SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.—It is the sense of

9 the Congress that, with regard to the appropriations proc10 ess, ‘‘forward funding’’ tactics should no longer be utilized

11 and the Congress should operate within the funding limits

12 prescribed for each fiscal year.
67

•S 1090 IS

Æ

S 1090 IS——2

S 1090 IS——3

S 1090 IS——4

S 1090 IS——5