alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
l\Iarch 26, 2012 

### GOVERNMENT OF PUERTO RICO GOVERNOR'S OFFICE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD 

### CHAIRMAN'S OFFICE

MRS. JUDI'l1IA. ENCK REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR USEPA- REGION II 290 BROAD\\' AY 25mFLOOR NEWYO!U<::NY 10007-1866 Puerto Rico Designation for the New 1-Hour S02 NAAQS Withdrawn ofinitialrecommendation and newrecommendation 

### PUEHTO HICO 

## VERDE

On June 3, 2012 the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board (PREQB) submitted the initial designation for all areas in Puerto Rico, pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C 7407(d)(1)(A)). PREQB recommended the EPA to classify the Barceloneta/Manati, Guayama, San Juan, and Guayanilla/Ponce areas as "non-attaitunent" under the revised NAAQS for S02. It also proposed that the Mayaguez and Fajardo/Humacao areas be designated as unclassified areas for S02• Tlus itutialrequest was based on monitoring data andresults from a refined air dispersion model. More recently, the PREQB has gathered additional information related to the emission inventory used for the dispersion models demonstration. Since the emission inventmy may not reflect the more recent and available information, as required for the sulfur dioxide designation (75 FR 35569), the PREQB is requesting toretire the reconunendations containedin tl1e letter datedJune 3, 2011. In consequence, the PREQB is now subnutting an "unclassifiable" recommendation for all areas of Puerto Rico. Please feel free to contact me at (787) 767-8056 ifyou have any questions regarding tlus matter, or contactMr. Luis Sierra, Manager ofthe Air QualityArea, at (787) 787-756-8393.



# ;e: I tfiranda

c. GeorgePavlou Jose Font
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                       LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<Table>
<S>                                                                   <C>                       <C>
Brooktrout Holdings, Inc.                                             Delaware                  100%
  Brooktrout Technology, Inc.                                         Delaware                  100%
  Netaccess, Inc.                                                     Delaware                  100%
  Brooktrout Business Trust                                           Massachusetts             100%
    Brooktrout Software, Inc.                                         Delaware                  100%
  Brooktrout Technology Foreign Sales Corporation                     Virgin Islands            100%
  Brooktrout Securities Corporation                                   Massachusetts             100%
Brooktrout Technology Europe, LTD.                                    Massachusetts             100%
Brooktrout Technology (Europe) Limited                                United Kingdom            100%
Interspeed, Inc.                                                      Delaware                   56%
Pelago Networks, Inc.                                                 Delaware                   28%
</Table>
#### James A. HARRELL, Jr. v. STATE of Florida.

No. 38845.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 222 So.2d 291.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Golden  Enterprises,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the third  quarter ended  February 29, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Mark W. McCutcheon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   April 12, 2004



/s/ Mark W. McCutcheon
----------------------
Mark W. McCutcheon
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                       18
Exhibit 4.1





Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


March 16, 2021


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2060


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor


New York, NY 10286


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2060 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-251348 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
# C_2023035EN.01005101.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/51

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — KN v Parliament

(Case T-401/21) (1)

(Institutional law - Member of the EESC - Discharge procedure in respect of the implementation of the EESC’s budget for the 2019 financial year - Resolution of the Parliament designating the applicant as the perpetrator of psychological harassment - Action for annulment - Non-actionable measure - Inadmissibility - Action for damages - Protection of personal data - Presumption of innocence - Duty of confidentiality - Principle of sound administration - Proportionality - Sufficiently serious infringement of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)

(2023/C 35/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: KN (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld and M. Aboudi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: R. Crowe, C. Burgos and M. Allik, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action, the applicant seeks, first, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, annulment of Decision (EU, Euratom) 2021/1552 of the European Parliament of 28 April 2021 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2019, Section VI — European Economic and Social Committee (OJ 2021 L 340, p. 140), and of Resolution (EU) 2021/1553 of the European Parliament of 29 April 2021 with comments forming an integral part of the decision on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2019, Section VI — European Economic and Social Committee (OJ 2021 L 340, p. 141), and, secondly, on the basis of Article 268 TFEU, compensation for the damage which it has allegedly suffered as a result of the contested acts.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders KN to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders KN to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 338, 23.8.2021.

---
IV

House Calendar No. 213

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 517

[Report No. 103–697]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

amendments of the House to the amendment of the Senate to the

bill (H.R. 3355) to amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets

Act of 1968 to allow grants to increase police presence, to expand

and improve cooperative efforts between law enforcement agencies and

members of the community to address crime and disorder problems,

and otherwise to enhance public safety.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 10, 1994

Mr. DERRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the amendments of the House to the amendment of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 3355) to amend

the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of

1968 to allow grants to increase police presence, to expand and improve cooperative efforts between law enforcement agencies and members of the community to

address crime and disorder problems, and otherwise to

enhance public safety.
2

HRES 517 RH

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the amendments of the House to the amendment

4 of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 3355) to amend the Omni5 bus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to allow

6 grants to increase police presence, to expand and improve

7 cooperative efforts between law enforcement agencies and

8 members of the community to address crime and disorder

9 problems, and otherwise to enhance public safety. All

10 points of order against the conference report and against

11 its consideration are waived. The conference report shall

12 be considered as read.

House Calendar No. 213

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 517

[Report No. 103–697]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reenhance public safety. crime and disorder problems, and otherwise to cies and members of the community to address operative efforts between law enforcement agen- crease police presence, to expand and improve co- Safe Streets Act of 1968 to allow grants to in- 3355) to amend the Omnibus Crime Control and to the amendment of the Senate to the bill (H.R. port to accompany the amendments of the House

AUGUST 10, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### Gray vs. Kinsworthy et al.

*Appeal from Iiempstead Circuit Court in Chancery.*

Hempstead, for the appellant.

Watkins & Gallagher, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Compton

delivered the opinion of the Court.

*160The relief sought by the bill was the confirmation of a tax title to certain lands described in the pleadings. *Graij*appeared and answered the bill, setting up title .in himself, and resisting the confirmation.

On the final hearing the court decreed for the complainants, and the defendant appealed.

There is no question in this case which was not decided in *Kinsworthy et al. vs. Mitchell & wife,*at the present-term. And finding no error in the record the decree must be affirmed with costs.

Mr. Justice Rector dissented in this case.
#### Hazel E. ROWLEY, Appellant, v. NATIONAL AIRLINES, INC., and The Travelers Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 72-340.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 13, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Arthur BENWOIR, Jr.

No. 62702.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 15, 1978.

In re: Arthur Benwoir, Jr., applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied. Appeal pending La.C.Cr.Pr. Art. 363.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ViroPharma Incorporated (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Vincent J. Milano                
|Vincent J. Milano                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 1, 2009                          
|                                     
|/s/ Charles A. Rowland, Jr.          
|Charles A. Rowland, Jr.              
|Chief Financial Officer              
|May 1, 2009
#### SKYTEL AVIATION, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. AERSONIC CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-44.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 8, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
★

H. Res. 343

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

February 23, 1994.

Whereas the United States House of Representatives strongly

opposes racism, anti-Catholicism, anti-Semitism, and all

forms of ethnic or religious intolerance;

Whereas the racist, anti-Catholic, and anti-Semitic speech

given by Khalid Abdul Muhammad of the Nation of

Islam at Kean College on November 29, 1993, incites divisiveness and violence on the basis of race, religion, and

ethnicity; and

Whereas Mr. Muhammad specifically justifies the slaughter

of Jews during the Holocaust as fully deserved; disparages the Pope in the most revolting personal terms; and

calls for the assassination of every white infant, child,

man, and woman in South Africa: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) condemns the speech given by Khalid Abdul

3 Muhammad as outrageous hatemongering of the

4 most vicious and vile kind; and
2

HRES 343 EH1S

1 (2) condemns all manifestations and expres2 sions of racism, anti-Catholicism, anti-Semitism, and

3 ethnic or religious intolerance.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### RYDER TRUCK LINES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TEAMSTERS FREIGHT LOCAL UNION NO. 480, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 81-5127.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 14, 1983.

Cecil Branstetter, R. Jan Jennings, Nashville, Tenn., for defendants-appellants.

Robert H. Cowan, Michael Miller, Malcolm McCune, Gracy, Maddin, Cowan & Bird, Nashville, Tenn., for plaintiff-appel-lee.

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular service have voted for rehearing of *234this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

> The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court, 705 F.2d 851, is vacated, issuance of the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal. The Clerk will direct the parties concerning the filing of supplemental briefs.
#### N. M. ISRAELSON, Appellant, v. Estill BREWER et al., Appellees.

No. 73-271.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 8, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                         319,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,790,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                   168,000
<INVENTORY>                                    562,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,871,200
<PP&E>                                       4,849,600
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,609,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,125,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,397,900
<BONDS>                                      9,755,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,759,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,059,100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,125,900
<SALES>                                      4,726,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,726,900
<CGS>                                        3,428,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,428,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               932,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             202,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                164,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            164,400
<DISCONTINUED>                               (240,700)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (76,300)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION OF THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K, WHICH IS ATTACHED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000752634
<NAME>                        EARTH SEARCH SCIENCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             168,637
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       22,245
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   168,637
<PP&E>                                           4,447,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                     624,139
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,992,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,278,445
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              117,845
<PREFERRED>                                        200,000
<COMMON>                                            97,411
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4,895,548)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,992,233
<SALES>                                            881,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   881,000
<CGS>                                             (767,570)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   (1,372,307)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (10,810)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (773,288)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,156,405)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,156,405)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (115,023)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,271,428)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.025)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.025)



</TABLE>
# C_2022266EN.01002501.xml

| 11.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Roos and Others v Parliament

(Joined Cases T-710/21, T-722/21 and T-723/21) (1)

(Public health - Requirement to present a valid EU digital COVID-19 certificate to access the Parliament’s buildings - Legal basis - Freedom and independence of Members of the European Parliament - Obligation to ensure the health of staff in the service of the European Union - Parliamentary immunity - Processing of personal data - Right to respect for private life - Right to physical integrity - Right to security - Equal treatment - Proportionality)

(2022/C 266/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Robert Roos and 17 other applicants whose names appear in the annex to the judgment (represented by: P. de Bandt, M. Gherghinaru, L. Panepinto and V. Heinen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Alves and A.-M. Dumbrăvan, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their actions under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants, who are all elected Members of the European Parliament for the 2019-2024 term, seek the annulment of the Parliament Bureau Decision of 27 October 2021 on exceptional health and safety rules for access to the Parliament’s buildings at its three places of work.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders Robert Roos and the other applicants whose names appear in the annex to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Robert Roos and the other applicants whose names appear in the annex to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 11, 10.1.2022.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
TMBR/Sharp Drilling, Inc.

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (No.33-46699, No. 33-89878 and No. 333-32028) on Form S-8, and the
registration statement (No. 333-23391) on Form S-3, of TMBR/Sharp Drilling, Inc.
of our report dated June 5, 2003 with respect to the balance sheets of
TMBR/Sharp Drilling, Inc. as of March 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years
then ended and all related financial statement schedules, which report appears
in the March 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K/A of TMBR/Sharp Drilling, Inc.
The 2001 financial statements and financial statement schedule of TMBR/Sharp
Drilling, Inc. were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. Those
auditors expressed an unqualified opinion of those financial statements and
financial statement schedule in their report dated May 18, 2001.

                                        /s/ KPMG LLP

Midland, Texas
December 30, 2003