alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022303EN.01004101.xml

| 8.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — QI v Commission

(Case T-122/21) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Evaluation report - 2018 and 2019 evaluation exercises - Unsatisfactory evaluation of managerial performance - General implementing provisions of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations - Validation procedure - Principle of impartiality - Manifest error of assessment)

(2022/C 303/50)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: QI (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and L. Hohenecker, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, lodged at the Court Registry on 25 February 2022, the applicant seeks annulment of her evaluation reports drawn up for the 2018 and 2019 evaluation exercises and of the decision of 16 November 2020 rejecting her complaint against those reports.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls QI’s evaluation report drawn up for the 2019 evaluation exercise; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls QI’s evaluation report drawn up for the 2019 evaluation exercise;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 19.4.2021.

---
EXHIBIT 31
                                                                      ----------

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Earth Search
Sciences, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 21, 2003                        /s/ Larry F Vance
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Larry F Vance
                                              Chairman of the Board and
                                              Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>


                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned Acting Chief Financial Officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:  August 21, 2003                        /s/ Tami J Story
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Tami J Story
                                              Acting Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1170 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1170

  To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to provide for leasing of certain 
                    lands for oil and gas purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 29 (legislative day, June 22), 1993

 Mr. Campbell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to provide for leasing of certain 
                    lands for oil and gas purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Section 1. Section 17 of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 226) is 
amended by adding the following new subsection at the end thereof:
    ``(o)(1) Authority To Lease.--Notwithstanding any other provision 
of law, the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the 
Secretary of Energy, may lease for oil and gas exploration, development 
and production the public domain lands located in Garfield County, 
Colorado, reserved by Executive order of the President dated December 
6, 1916 (as amended by Executive order of the President dated June 12, 
1919), and by Executive order of the President dated September 27, 
1924, subject to valid existing rights, and pursuant to the 
requirements of this Act.
    ``(2) Management.--The Secretary of the Interior, through the 
Bureau of Land Management, shall hereafter manage the surface estate in 
the lands covered by this subsection, pursuant to the Federal Land 
Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701, et seq.), and other 
laws applicable to the public lands.
    ``(3) Royalty.--A lease of lands by the Secretary of the Interior 
under this subsection shall be conditioned upon the payment of a 
royalty pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, except that the 
Secretary may establish a sliding scale royalty of not less than 12.5 
per centum and not more than 25 per centum in amount or value of the 
production removed or sold from the lease.
    ``(4) Existing Equipment.--The lease of lands by the Secretary 
under this subsection may include the transfer, at fair market value, 
of wells, gathering lines, and related equipment owned by the United 
States on the lands referenced in paragraph (1) and suitable for use in 
the exploration, development or production of hydrocarbons on such 
lands.''.

                                 <all>
```
H. Res. 410

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

April 28, 1994.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 3221) to provide for the adjudication of certain

claims against the Government of Iraq. The first reading of

the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on Foreign Affairs. After general debate

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original

bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule

the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by

the Committee on Foreign Affairs now printed in the bill.

Each section of the committee amendment in the nature of

a substitute shall be considered as read. Points of order

against the committee amendment in the nature of a sub-
2

HRES 410 EH

stitute for failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XVI are

waived. No amendment to the committee amendment in the

nature of a substitute shall be in order unless printed in the

portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII before the beginning of consideration of the bill. The amendment caused to be printed in

the Record by Representative Bereuter of Nebraska (relating

to certain commercial claims) may amend portions of the bill

not yet read for amendment. After disposition of all other

amendments to the committee amendment in the nature of a

substitute, it shall be in order to consider an amendment

caused to be printed in the Record by Representative Bonior

of Michigan (relating to humanitarian assistance) and an

amendment caused to be printed in the Record by Representative Solomon of New York (relating to war crimes) in the

order stated. Points of order against each of those amendments for failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XVI are

waived. After disposition of those amendments, no further

amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a

substitute shall be in order. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and

report the bill to the House with such amendments as may

have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote

in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee

of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in
3

HRES 410 EH

the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to

final passage without intervening motion except one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.3


 


 


A NEVADA COMPANY


 


1980 FEDERAL PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE
530, LAS VEGAS, NV 89135


 


December 11th 2020


 


 


David J. Klimczak


Direct Transfer, LLC / Issuer Direct Corporation


One Glenwood Avenue, Suite 1001


Raleigh, NC, 27603


 


 


Re: DKG CAPITAL INC (the “Company”)


 


Dear David,


 


This letter is to inform you
that the Board of Directors has appointing a new transfer agent, Pacific Stock Transfer Company and hereby terminates all services
with your firm as well as any and all agreements relating to your duties as of December 11th 2020. You will need to
promptly file the 17ad-16 ( Notice of Assumption or Termination
of Transfer Agent Services) with DTCC . We are providing the link below for your convenience.


 


http://www.dtcc.com/settlement-and-asset-services/agent-services/dtc-eligible-agent


 


Pacific stock transfer company
will be reaching out to you to coordinate a smooth conversion. Please let us know the primary contact person at your firm to coordinate
the conversion.


 


The Company thanks you for
your past services and sincerely appreciates your cooperation in this matter.


 


/s/ Tesheb Casimir                                             


TESHEB CASIMIR,
CEO

DKG CAPITAL INC
#### T. D. SPILLER, Jr. v. Peggy Mattingly HERPEL, Individually and as testamentary executrix of the Succession of Ama Spiller Mattingly.

No. 60766.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 4, 1977.

In re: Peggy Mattingly Herpel, individually and as Testamentary Executrix of the Succession of AMA Spiller Mattingly, applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Lafourche. 358 So.2d 960.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gene LONDON.

No. 60643.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

Frank J. Gremillion, Hynes & Gremillion, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie Brown, Dist. Atty., Warren J. Hebert, Marilyn C. Castle, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2020191EN.01003501.xml

| 8.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/35

---

Action brought on 9 April 2020 — Davide Groppi v EUIPO — Viabizzuno (Lamps)

(Case T-187/20)

(2020/C 191/47)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Davide Groppi Srl (Piacenza, Italy) (represented by: F. Boscariol de Roberto, D. Capra and V. Malerba, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Viabizzuno Srl (Bentivoglio, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the Court

Design at issue: Community design No 2 503 680-0001

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 January 2020 in Case R 126/2019-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant and respondent to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and respondent to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

---
Exhibit 11 – Statement regarding computation ofper share earnings
 
Earnings  (Loss) Per Common Share: Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing  income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares  outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur  if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into  common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings  of the entity. The primary weighted average number of common shares outstanding was  5,598,146, 5,636,064, and 5,593,667 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999  respectively.

For the Year Ended 2001 Income(Numerator)Shares(Denominator)Per-ShareAmount
Basic EPS Income available to common stockholders
$(10,296)      =========5,083,146      =========$ -      ====
Diluted EPS      Income available to       common stockholders + assumed conversion
$(10,296)      =========5,598,146      =========$ -      ====
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 57

To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a threefifths majority on passage of any bill, amendment, or conference report

that increases revenues.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 1993

Mr. SOLOMON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to

require a three-fifths majority on passage of any bill,

amendment, or conference report that increases revenues.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION l. SUPER-MAJORITY REQUIREMENT OF LEGISLA3 TION RAISING TAXES.

4 (a) RULE XXI.—Rule XXI of the Rules of the House

5 of Representatives is amended by inserting at the end the

6 following new clause:

7 ‘‘9. It shall not be in order in the House to agree

8 to any bill, joint resolution, amendment, or conference re-
2

•HRES 57 IH

1 port that increases revenues, except by a vote of three2 fifths of the Members voting, a quorum being present.’’.

3 (b) RULE XLIX.—Clause 1 of rule XLIX of the

4 Rules of the House of Representatives is amended—

5 (1) in the first sentence by inserting before the

6 first comma the following: ‘‘and if the three-fifths

7 vote requirement of the next sentence is satisfied’’;

8 and

9 (2) in the second sentence by inserting before

10 the period at the end the following: ‘‘, but only if

11 agreed to in the House by at least three-fifths of the

12 Members voting, a quorum being present’’.

13 SEC. 2. LIMITATION.

14 The last sentence of clause 4(b) of rule XI of the

15 Rules of the House of Representatives is amended by in16 serting before the period the following: ‘‘; nor shall it re17 port any rule or order which would waive the requirement

18 of clause 9 of rule XXI to any bill, joint resolution, amend19 ment, or conference report.’’.

Æ
No. 10731.

#### The City of Columbus *v.*The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Decided February 23, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Franklin county.

*Mr. George S. Marshall,*city solicitor; *Mr. Edgar L. Weinland*and *Mr. Fred R. Hoover,*for plaintiff in error.

*474*Mr. W. O.*Henderson, for defendant in error.

Judgment modified as stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment and decree of the said circuit court be and the same hereby is modified so as to require said defendant, The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company to erect or cause to be erected, at its own expense, on so much of its said property, described in the petition, fronting on the east side of said viaduct and its north approach, as lies north of the defendant’s buildings heretofore erected and now existing on a part of its said property and. referred to in the petition; and on so much of its said property described in the petition, fronting on the west side of said viaduct and its north approach, as lies between the north line of the right of way of The Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company and the south line of the building known as the Monj^peny-Hammond Company building, erected since the beginning of this action on a part of said defendant’s property, the south line of said building being at or near the south line of the north abutment of said viaduct, at the same elevation and with the same clearance as that of the viaduct, namely, sixteen feet, three inches, neat and ornamental buildings of the kind of material, size and style of the defendant’s said existing buildings, to be commenced by said defendant within sixty days after this decree has been entered on the journal of this court and to be prosecuted without unnecessary delay, and to be fullv completed within two years after the entry of this decree. And this cour-t doth reserve *475the consideration of all further directions and modifications of said judgment and decree and of the obligation of the said defendant in error to build on other portions of its said property, particularly on that property fronting on. the viaduct south of Maple street, and either party shall be at liberty to apply to the court as occasion shall require. In all other respects said judgment and decree is affirmed. Ordered that the further consideration of this case be adjourned until the further order of the court. Ordered that the cross-petition in error herein be and the same is hereby dismissed at the costs of the said defendant in error herein,' and it is further ordered that the' said defendant in error pay its own costs herein and that plaintiff in error herem recover its costs from the said defendant in error.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ-, concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-42398, 333-42400, 333-42402, 333-42404,
333-62744) of Manufacturers' Services Limited of our report dated February 1,
2002, except for Note 1 and Note 22, as to which the date is March 27, 2002,
relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 2002
#### Charlie Prince FOOTMAN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-642.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

May 14, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2022294EN.01002802.xml

| 1.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — F I S I v EUIPO — Verband der Deutschen Daunen- und Federnindustrie (ECODOWN)

(Case T-338/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark ECODOWN - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001))

(2022/C 294/41)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: F I S I Fibre sintetiche SpA (Oggiono, Italy) (represented by: G. Cartella and B. Cartella, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Verband der Deutschen Daunen- und Federnindustrie eV (Mayence, Germany) (represented by: M. Travostino and N. Bottero, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 April 2021 (Case R 216/2020-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders F I S I Fibre sintetiche SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders F I S I Fibre sintetiche SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.

---
#### McLAIN LINE, Inc., v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

No. 266.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 1, 1937.

*436Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper (Chauncey I. Clark and Frederic Conger, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Earl Appleman, of New York City, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case involves only questions of fact, and as the evidence is confused and the permissible inferences contradictory, the conclusion of the District Judge is final, as we have said again and again. Indeed, we understood upon the argument that the chief reason for the appeal was lest the commissioner in computing damages should feel himself concluded by a passage in the opinion which declared that “ordinarily there is some damage to coal from sea water.” Upon the hearing before him this is not to be taken as a finding either that it is true as it stands, or that the coal at issue was injured by sea water. He will consider the issue afresh, as though the District Judge had not determined it, as he probably did not mean to do anyway.

Decree affirmed.