alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[GRAPHIC OMITTED]




January 7, 1997

Tyler Runnels
TR Winston & Company, Inc.
1999 Avenue of the Stars #1950
Los Angeles, CA  90067

RE: AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE WITH PREFERRED TELECOM, INC.

Dear Mr. Runnels:

Pursuant  to our  discussions,  this letter  will serve as  confirmation  of our
agreement to amend the prior Loan Agreement and Promissory  Note entered into by
and between Bisbro  Investments  Company Ltd.  ("Bisbro") and Preferred Telecom,
Inc. ("Preferred"), dated November 12, 1996 ("Loan Agreement" and "Note").

For and in consideration of the additional $50,000  contributed by First Capital
Financial Services  Corporation  ("First Capital"),  Preferred and Bisbro hereby
consent and agree that all  references  to the loan amount of $100,000  shall be
amended to read "$150,000" and said $50,000 contribution will be governed by the
same Loan  Agreement  and Note as referred to above,  and First  Capital will be
granted the same rights proportionately thereof,  including but not limited to a
proportionate  share  of the  rights  in the  collateral,  and  warrants  issued
pursuant thereto.

This letter will also  acknowledge and confirm that the Secured  Promissory Note
dated  December 1, 1996 in the amount of $50,000 is canceled and  superseded  by
this letter,  and that the Loan Agreement now consists of a total  obligation by
Preferred  to Bisbro and First  Capital  in the total  amount of  $150,000  plus
applicable  interest,  options  and  warrants,  in  consideration  for  $100,000
tendered on November 12, 1996, and $50,000 on December 27, 1996.

Very truly yours,


Gary J. Graham


AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

Bisbro Investments Company Ltd.              Preferred Telecom, Inc.

Bader Al-Rezaihan                            Dennis L. Gundy, President & C.O.O.

                                             G. Ray Miller, Chairman & C.E.O.

      9250 EAST COSTILLA AVENUE o SUITE 650 o ENGLEWOOD o COLORADO o 80112
       PHONE 303.792.0414 o FAX 303.792.0533 CORPDAL:61691.1 26287-00001
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
        - News Releases

#  News Releases 

**Collected by:** U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 

**Archived since:**Sep, 2013

**Description:**
This collection includes HHS news and announcements from 1991+.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Science & Health

**Creator:**    	    OS/ASPA

## Narrow Your Results

**Creator**

Sort By:
- Count
- (A-Z)
              - HHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs (ASPA) (1)

**Categories**

Sort By:
- Count
- (A-Z)
              - Affordable Care Act (1)

**Group**

Sort By:
- Count
- (A-Z)
              - HHS News Releases (1)

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear
            - Date :  2013           X        
            - Date :  2013           X        
            - topic :  Affordable Care Act, Holidays and Observances           X        

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (1 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### 	  Title:       Statement by HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on LGBT Health Awareness Week    	  

### URL:     https://www.hhs.gov/about/2013/03/25/statement-by-hhs-secretary-kathleen-sebelius-on-lgbt-health-awareness-week.html

**Description:**	  	Shortly after the Affordable Care Act was enacted, President Obama asked me to identify steps we could take at the Department of Health and Human Services to improve the health and well-being of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) Americans.	  

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

**Creator:**    	    HHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs (ASPA)

**Date:**        	2013        

**Group:**    	    HHS News Releases

**Categories:**    	    Affordable Care Act

**topic:**        	Affordable Care Act, Holidays and Observances        

Page 1 of 1  (1 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation;
 (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
    Dated: May 15, 2008
    By:
    /s/ James T. EngenJames T. EngenChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Elizabeth Cusack, Appellant-Respondent, v Waldbaum, Inc., Respondent, and Gloss Boss Maintenance, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.

[736 NYS2d 687]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, (O’Connell, J.), dated October 6, 2000, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Waldbaum, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and the defendant Gloss Boss Maintenance, Inc., cross-appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

*475Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as cross-appealed from, on the law, the cross motion is granted, and the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against the defendant Gloss Boss Maintenance, Inc., are dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendants are awarded one bill of costs.

The plaintiff, Elizabeth Cusack, sustained injuries when she slipped and fell while walking through the entrance door of a supermarket owned by the defendant Waldbaum, Inc. (hereinafter Waldbaum). Before this occurrence, the defendant Gloss Boss Maintenance, Inc. (hereinafter Gloss Boss) cleaned the supermarket floor pursuant to an oral contract with Waldbaum. Thereafter, the plaintiff commenced this action against Waldbaum and Gloss Boss.

“On a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint based upon lack of notice, the defendant is required to make a prima facie showing affirmatively establishing the absence of notice as a matter of law” *(Goldman v Waldbaum, Inc.,*248 AD2d 436, 437). Here, in support of its motion for summary judgment, Waldbaum made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment by demonstrating that it did not have notice of the alleged slippery condition which caused the plaintiff to fall. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted Waldbaum’s motion for summary judgment (see, *Baer v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co.,*264 AD2d 791).

However, the Supreme Court improperly denied the cross motion of Gloss Boss for summary judgment because the contract between Gloss Boss and Waldbaum did not constitute a comprehensive and exclusive property maintenance obligation which the parties could have reasonably expected to displace Waldbaum’s duty as a landowner to safely maintain the property *(see, Sapone v Commercial Bldg. Maintenance Corp.,*262 AD2d 393; *Agbi v York Intl. Corp.,*249 AD2d 430; *cf., Polka v Servicemaster Mgt. Servs. Corp.,*83 NY2d 579, 587-588). As such, Gloss Boss did not assume a duty to the plaintiff *(see, Sapone v Commercial Bldg. Maintenance Corp., supra).*Florio, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
#### Mrs. Gladys HAMMONS v. William STEPHENSON et al.

No. 44791.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 4, 1968.

Cumbest, O’Barr & Shaddock, Pascagou-la, for appellant.

Megehee & Brown, Pascagoula, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-01-1999
<CASH>                                           5,540
<SECURITIES>                                        10
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                        27
<INVENTORY>                                        483
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,823
<PP&E>                                          63,120
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,990
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           345
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,694
<SALES>                                          7,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,003
<CGS>                                            6,306
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,795
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,949)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (562)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,388)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,388)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0643 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-SW-096-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        22407531
<SECURITIES>                                  65308219
<RECEIVABLES>                                 10429731
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             103397045
<PP&E>                                         8728760
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3957959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               140897482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         26079574
<BONDS>                                         402776
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         97727
<OTHER-SE>                                   114317405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 140897482
<SALES>                                       38457283
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              38457283
<CGS>                                         26972653
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 26972653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               26918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               15274035
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5040991
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           10233044
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  10233044
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambassadors International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, John A. Ueberroth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Timothy T. Fogarty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/   John A. Ueberroth
John A. Ueberroth
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2002
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/   Timothy T. Fogarty

Timothy T. Fogarty
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

20
P.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

257) ll-K- (I) -70 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:57 AM Sheet 257 of 325 
P.2 

Wo) 

n-K-CI)-70 

INDUSTRIAL BOILER NSPS IMPACT ANALYSIS, SEVENTH ROUND 

TEST CASES: IFCAM MODEL RESULTS. 

EEA, Inc. 

October 8, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-70
#### P. L. CARNEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 4140.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Jan. 18, 1973.

James A. Bolen, Jr., Alexandria, for defendant-appellant.

Kramer & Kennedy, by Ralph W. Kennedy, Jr., Alexandria, Gist, Methvin & Trimble, by H. B. Gist, Jr., Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before HOOD, CULPEPPER and MILLER, JJ.

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

HOOD, Judge.

This case is before us on a motion to dismiss an appeal taken by defendants, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Glaser Construction Company, Inc., insofar as the appeal may affect or relate to a summary judgment rendered by the trial court on May 18, 1972. We deny the motion.

The suit was instituted originally against Liberty Mutual and Glaser, and these defendants filed a third party action against Employers Mutual Insurance Company of Wisconsin. A summary judgment was rendered by the trial court on May 18, 1972, dismissing the third party action against Employers Mutual. Liberty Mutual and Glaser appealed from that judgment, and the appeal was timely perfected by filing an appeal bond on August 17, 1972.

After the above mentioned summary judgment was rendered, the case was tried on its merits, and the trial judge rendered judgment on September 14, 1972, in favor of plaintiff and against defendants, Liberty Mutual and Glaser. The defendants then took a separate appeal from that judgment, and that appeal was timely perfected by the filing of an appeal bond on November 6, 1972. The record has been lodged in this court on both of those appeals.

Employers Mutual, the third party defendant, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal insofar as it affects the summary judgment rendered on May 18, 1972, alleging as grounds for the relief sought that the appeal was taken too late. In that motion it alleges that no appeal was taken from the summary judgment rendered on May 18, 1972, and that the appeal taken from the judgment rendered on September 14, 1972, was too late to affect the summary judgment.

The record discloses that neither the mover nor its counsel were ever notified of the fact that a separate appeal had been taken from the summary judgment rendered on May 18, 1972. They thus were not aware of the fact that such an appeal had been granted and perfected when the motion to dismiss the appeal was filed. The mover concedes that its motion to dis-

*382miss should be denied if a separate appeal from the summary judgment was, in fact, perfected timely. We find that an appeal from the summary judgment was granted and perfected within the delays allowed by law.

The failure of the clerk of court to mail a notice of the appeal to counsel of record for the mover does not affect the validity of the appeal. LSA-C.C.P. art. 2121.

For the reasons assigned, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Motion denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ashton Woodbourne, Appellant.

[656 NYS2d 891]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered February 24, 1995, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, assault in the second degree, unlawful imprisonment, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the inference of his guilt is consistent with, and flows naturally from, the facts proved *(see, People v White,*162 AD2d 646, 647, citing *People v Kennedy,*47 NY2d 196, 202). The proof was sufficient for the jury to infer that it was equally the purpose of both the defendant and his coperpetrator to cause the death of the victim, and that the defendant therefore possessed the requisite mental culpability for the commission of each offense for which he stands convicted *(see, People v White, supra,*at 648; *People v Allah,*71 NY2d 830, 832; *People v Ramos,*130 AD2d 688, 689). The People were not obligated to prove that the defendant fired the fatal shot *(see, People v Brathwaite,*63 NY2d 839; *People v White, supra).*Rather, the existence of intent to kill may be inferred from the totality of the conduct of the defendant and the surrounding circumstances *(see, People v White, supra,*at 648; *see also, People v Bracey,*41 NY2d 296, 301; *People v Armistead,*178 AD2d 607, 608; *People v Turner,*141 AD2d 878; *People v Santana,*141 AD2d 778, 779).

The defendant’s remaining contention that a *Dunaway*hear*548ing should have been held is unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Miguel,*53 NY2d 920; *People v Martin,*50 NY2d 1029; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245, 250). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.