alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 131 (Monday, July 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14562]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-1863-000]


Coolidge Solar I, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding 
Coolidge Solar I, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is July 18, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1f7f4e3f2fedfddd8dfd4e2c4c1c1dec3c5f1d7d4c3d29fd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="75333027363a1b191c1b10260005051a070135131007165b121a03">[email protected]</span></a> or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, 
call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: June 28, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14562 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### C. Archie CLEMENT, Appellant, v. Claudette B. CLEMENT, Appellee.

No. 72-752.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 16, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 14, 1974.

George W. Greer, Clearwater, for appellant.

Leon Whitehurst, Jr., and David Brow-der, Jr., Clearwater, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

One of the points raised on appeal at first gave us pause, but after having carefully considered that point and having meticulously reviewed the record herein, we conclude that no prejudicial error has been made to appear. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

McNULTY, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.

GOODRICH, LAURENCE I., Associate • Judge, dissents.
Order filed, August 19, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00567-CV

____________

JOHN D. GUIMOND AND MARY GRACE GUIMOND, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF NICOLAS R. GUIMOND, A MINOR, 

Appellant

V.

INTEGRATED GENETICS LAB CORP SPECIALTY TESTING GROUP, 

ET AL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2015-30393

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due August 16, 2016. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Michelle Tucker, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
AIR-15-3344-E September 29, 2015

Exemption No. 8429E Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2004-18023

Mr. Kim Durnwirth

Director Regulatory & Quality System Oversight Boeing Commercial Airplanes P.O. Box 3707, MC 67-XC Seattle, WA 98124-2207

Dear Mr. Durnwirth:

This letter is to inform you that we ha ve granted your petition to extend and amend Exemption No. 8429, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its

effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated July 15, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of The Boeing Company (Boeing) for an extension and amendment of Exemption No. 8429, as amended. That exemption from § 45.29 (b)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), allows Bo eing to affix temporary registra tion marks that are less than

12 inches tall on certain airc raft during production acceptance flights. The amendment you request would add the Boeing South Carolina fa cility (airport ID CHS, Charleston AFBInternational Airport) to the list of those locations where th e use of “window numbers” is allowed under the exemption.

In your petition, you indicate there has been no ch ange in the conditions, public interest, and equivalent level of safety that were th e basis for granting the original exemption.2

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8429, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegate d to me, I grant The Boeing Company (Boeing) an exemption from § 45.29 (b)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federa l Regulations (14 CFR) to allow Boeing to affix temporary registration marks that are less than 12 inches tall on certain aircraft during production acceptance flights, subject to the following Conditions and Limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Boeing may exercise the privileges of th is exemption only for production acceptance flights in new production aircraft manuf actured by Boeing and operated under a special flight permit.

2. Boeing may exercise the privileges of this exemption at only the following locations: (1) Boeing Field; (2) Renton Municipal Air port; (3) Paine Field Ev erett and (4) CHS, Charleston AFB-International Airport.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination da te of Exemption No. 8429, as amended, to October 31, 2017 unless sooner s uperseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

//s//

Dorenda D. Baker Director, Aircraft Certification Service
# C_2023104EN.01000901.xml

| 20.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/9

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Úřad pro přístup k dopravní infrastruktuře — Czech Republic) — RegioJet a.s. v České dráhy a.s.

(Case C-104/21, (1) RegioJet)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 267 TFEU - Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ - Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body - Exercise of judicial or administrative functions - Directive 2012/34/EU - Articles 55 and 56 - Single national regulatory body for the railway sector - Independent regulatory authority for the sector - Entitlement to act on an ex officio basis - Power to impose penalties - Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts - Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

(2023/C 104/10)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Úřad pro přístup k dopravní infrastruktuře

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: RegioJet a.s.

Defendant: České dráhy a.s.

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Úřad pro přístup k dopravní infrastruktuře (Transport infrastructure access authority, Czech Republic), made by decision of 19 February 2021, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 148, 26.4.2021.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1000 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1000

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on anthraquinone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 20 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

Mr. Rockefeller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on anthraquinone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANTHRAQUINONE.

    Heading 9902.30.17 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States is amended by striking out ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/
95''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by this Act applies with 
respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
    (b) Reliquidation.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act 
of 1930 or any other provision of law, upon proper request filed with 
the appropriate customs officer on or before the 90th day after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, any entry of an article described in 
heading 9902.30.17 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992, and
            (2) before the date which is 15 days after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry occurred on or 
after the date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. EVANS FUR COMPANY et al.

No. 6099.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Jan. 4, 1937.

Before EVANS and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Now comes the petitioner by its counsel and presents a joint motion of petitioner and respondent that this petition for enforcement of order of Federal Trade Commission be dismissed. On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this court that this petition for enforcement of order of the Federal Trade Commission be, and the same is hereby, dismissed without prejudice to the right of said Federal Trade Commission, at its option and in its discretion, at any time or times hereafter, to file in this court or other court said petition or a like petition or such petition or papers as said Commission may elect, or to do such other acts as said Commission shall deem to be in the public interest.
|EXHIBIT 31.1                       
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|CERTIFICATION                      
|                                   
|I, Alston D. Correll, certify that:
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   



---

|                        |                                                                                                          | b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |                                                                                                          |                                                                                                                                                                              
|                        |                                                                                                          |                                                                                                                                                                              
|                        |                                                                                                          |                                                                                                                                                                              
|Date: November 10, 2003
|                        |                                                                                                          |                                                                                                                                                                              
|                        | /s/ ALSTON D. CORRELL                            
Alston D. Correll
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2****Certifications**I, Thomas J. Koenig, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Day International Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: August 14, 2006 By: /s/ Thomas J. Koenig       Thomas J. Koenig      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer      (Principal Financial Officer and      Principal Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND ON PAGES 1 THROUGH 3 OF THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                             824
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,347
<ALLOWANCES>                                       563
<INVENTORY>                                     58,297
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,351
<PP&E>                                          54,045
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,260
<BONDS>                                         13,069
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,710
<SALES>                                        155,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,637
<CGS>                                          144,099
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,419)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       779
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,198)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.18)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatements Nos. 33-60591, 333-95113, 333-99865, 333-105705, and 333-115964 ofSierra Health Services, Inc. on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-105403on Forms S-3 of our reports dated March 14, 2005, relating to theconsolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule included atItem 15 (a)(2) of Sierra Health Services, Inc. and management's report on theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Sierra Health Services, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2004.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP.Las Vegas, NevadaMarch 14, 2005
September 17, 2015

Mr. Robert P. Ivers

Velocity Business Solutions

9064 Terwilligers Ridge Drive

Cincinnati, OH 45249

Dear Mr. Ivers:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your June 10, 2015, exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2758, 

but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4