alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022198EN.01001602.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/16

---

Appeal brought on 10 December 2021 by NB against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 28 September 2021 in Case T-648/20, NB v Court of Justice of the European Union

(Case C-774/21 P)

(2022/C 198/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: NB (represented by: J.-N. Louis, avocat, N. Maes, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Justice of the European Union

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the order under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the order under appeal;

and, giving judgment itself,

| — | annul the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union not to appoint her to Grade AST10 for appointment/promotion/‘reclassification’ exercise 2014-2018; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union not to appoint her to Grade AST10 for appointment/promotion/‘reclassification’ exercise 2014-2018;

| — | in any event, order the respondent to pay the costs at both instances. |
| --- | --- |

—

in any event, order the respondent to pay the costs at both instances.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of her appeal, the appellant claims that the General Court committed a manifest error of assessment in deciding that the action was inadmissible.

She also claims that the procedure put in place by the institution for the implementation of the 2014 reform of the Staff Regulations as regards appointment/promotion from Grade AST 9 to Grade AST10 is unlawful.

---
Order filed, February 05, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00991-CV

____________

GULF COAST ASPHALT COMPANY, L.L.C. AND TRIFINERY, INC., 

Appellant

V.

RUSSELL T. LLOYD, JOHN M. O’QUINN & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., AND

JOHN M.O’QUINN & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C., Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-61780

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due January 03, 2014. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.
We order Michelle Tucker, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7879
MICHAEL F. DEHONEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARGARET B. SEYMOUR, U. S. Magistrate; WILLIAM B. TRAXLER, U. S. District Judge; WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judges. (CA-96-1539-5-17JI) Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 30, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a South Carolina inmate, appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997), denying his motion to reconsider, and denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. Wehave reviewed the record and the district court's opinions accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Dehoney v. Seymour , No. CA-96-1539-5-17JI (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 1997; Nov. 7, 1997 & Nov. 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 99

                        INDEX TO EXHIBITS

10.1     First Amendment to Global Marine Inc. Executive Supplemental
         Retirement Plan of 1990.

10.2     First Amendment to Global Marine Executive Deferred Compensation Trust.

15.1     Letter of Independent Accountants regarding Awareness of Incorporation
         by Reference.

27.1     Financial Data Schedule.  (Exhibit 27.1 is being submitted as an
         exhibit only in the electronic format of this Quarterly Report on
         Form 10-Q being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
         Exhibit 27.1 shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 of
         the Securities Act of 1933, Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 or Section 323 of the Trust Indenture Act, or otherwise be
         subject to the liabilities of such sections, nor shall it be deemed
         a part of any registration statement to which it relates.)
# Table A-14. Unemployed persons by industry and class of worker, not seasonally adjusted A to Z Index | FAQs | About BLS | Contact Us Subscribe to E-mail Updates

What's New | Release Calendar | Site Map Search BLS.gov



# Economic News Release FONT SIZE: PRINT: CPS CES



### HOUSEHOLD DATA Table A-14. Unemployed persons by indust ry and class of worker, not seasonally adjusted

Industry and class of worker Number of unemployed persons (in thousands) Unemployment rates May 2010 May 2011 May 2010 May 2011 Total, 16 years and over ( 1 ) 14,369 13,421 9.3 8.7

Nonagricultural private wage and salary workers 11,655 10,628 9.9 8.9

Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction 46 32 6.2 3.8 Construction 1,755 1,367 20.1 16.3 Manufacturing 1,584 1,453 10.3 9.6

Durable goods 1,028 920 10.7 9.6 Nondurable goods 556 533 9.7 9.6 Wholesale and retail trade 1,998 1,845 9.8 9.0 Transportation and utilities 461 483 7.8 8.0 Information 319 227 9.8 7.3 Financial activities 618 612 6.8 6.8 Professional and business services 1,624 1,429 11.5 9.8 Education and health services 1,150 1,242 5.4 5.7 Leisure and hospitality 1,601 1,402 12.4 10.6 Other services 498 536 8.1 8.4 Agriculture and related privat e wage and salary workers 163 131 10.8 8.7 Government workers 771 836 3.4 3.9 Self-employed workers, uninco rporated, and unpaid family workers 600 636 5.6 6.1

Footnotes (1) Persons with no previous work experience and person s whose last job was in the U.S. Armed Forces are 

### Home Subject Areas Databases & Tools Publications Economic Releases
Beta 

## Page 1 of 2 Table A-14. Unemployed persons by industry and class of worker, not seasonally adjuste d

6/27/2011 htt p ://www.bls. g ov/news.release/em p sit.t14.htm

### Table of Contents included in the unemployed total. NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.

Freedom of Information Act | Privacy & Security Statement | Disclaimers | Customer Survey | Important Web Site Notices U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics | Division of Labor Force St atistics, PSB Suite 4675, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington,
DC 20212-0001 www.bls.gov/CPS | Telephone: 1-202-691-6378 | Contact CPS U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics | Divisi on of Current Employment Statistics, PS B Suite 4860, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20212-0001 www.bls.gov/CES | Telephone: 1-202-691-6555 | Contact CES 

### Last Modified Date: June 03, 2011

TOOLS Areas at a Glance Industries at a Glance Economic Releases Databases & Tables Maps CALCULATORS Inflation Location Quotient Injury And Illness HELP Help & Tutorials FAQs Glossary About BLS Contact Us INFO What's New Careers @ BLS Find It! DOL Join our Mailing Lists Linking & Copyright Info 

## Page 2 of 2 Table A-14. Unemployed persons by industry and class of worker, not seasonally adjuste d

6/27/2011 htt p ://www.bls. g ov/news.release/em p sit.t14.htm
# C_2023179EN.01003601.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2023 — B&Bartoni v EUIPO — Hypertherm (Electrode to insert into a torch)

(Case T-617/21) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing an electrode to insert into a torch - Ground for invalidity - Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Component part of a complex product)

(2023/C 179/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: B&Bartoni spol. s r.o. (Dolní Cetno, Czech Republic) (represented by: E. Lachmannová, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Hypertherm, Inc. (Hanover, New Hampshire, United States) (represented by: J. Day, Solicitor, and T. de Haan, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 July 2021 (Case R 2843/2019-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders B&Bartoni spol. s r.o. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders B&Bartoni spol. s r.o. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 471, 22.11.2021.

---
#### William DeAngelis, Appellant, v Board of Education of the City of New York et al., Respondents.

[721 NYS2d 558]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated July 17, 2000, as denied that branch of his motion which was for leave to serve a late notice of claim in connection with an injury he sustained on October 26, 1998.

*449Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

When deciding a motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the court must consider (1) whether the plaintiff has demonstrated a reasonable excuse for his or her failure to serve a timely notice of claim, (2) whether the municipality to be served acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within the 90 days after the claim arose or a reasonable time thereafter, (3) whether the plaintiff was an infant, or mentally or physically incapacitated, and (4) whether the delay would substantially prejudice the municipality in maintaining its defense on the merits (see, *Matter of Kittredge v New York City Hous. Auth.,*275 AD2d 746; *Rogers v City of Yonkers,*271 AD2d 593; *Matter of Guiliano v Town of Oyster Bay,*244 AD2d 408). This determination is left to the sound discretion of the court (see, *Ortega v New York City Hous. Auth.,*167 AD2d 337). Here, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the motion which was for leave to serve a late notice of claim in connection with an injury the plaintiff sustained on October 26, 1998. The plaintiff failed to demonstrate either a reasonable excuse for his delay, that the respondents acquired actual knowledge of the claim, or that the respondents would not be prejudiced. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheet of Global Marine Inc. and subsidiaries as
of 6-30-97 and the related condensed consolidated statement of operations for
the six months ended 6-30-97, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         116,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  133,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,600
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               276,700
<PP&E>                                         863,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                 273,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,008,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          115,700
<BONDS>                                        223,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,200
<OTHER-SE>                                     613,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,008,300
<SALES>                                          4,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               443,400
<CGS>                                            2,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  309,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                119,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (43,100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            162,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   162,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .92
        

</TABLE>
House Calendar No. 19

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 132

[Report No. 103–36]

RESOLUTION

Providing for the further consideration of the bill

30, 1993, and for other purposes.propriations for the fiscal year ending September(H.R. 1335) making emergency supplemental apMARCH 17, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 19

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 132

[Report No. 103–36]

Providing for the further consideration of the bill (H.R. 1335) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September

30, 1993, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 17, 1993

Mr. DERRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for the further consideration of the bill (H.R.

1335) making emergency supplemental appropriations

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for

other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider further in the House the

3 bill (H.R. 1335) making emergency supplemental appro4 priations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993,

5 and for other purposes. All points of order against the bill

6 are waived. It shall be in order to consider one amend-
2

HRES 132 RH

1 ment, if offered by the chairman of the Committee on Ap2 propriations. The amendment shall be considered as read,

3 shall be debatable for ten minutes equally divided and con4 trolled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be

5 subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a de6 mand for division of the question. All points of order

7 against the amendment are waived. The previous question

8 shall be considered as ordered on the amendment and on

9 the bill to final passage without intervening motion except

10 one motion to recommit, if offered by Representative

11 Michel of Illinois or his designee. A motion to recommit

12 with instructions shall be debatable for one hour equally

13 divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent.
# C_2021481EN.01001802.xml

| 29.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 481/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 481/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 16 September 2021 — CC v VO

(Case C-572/21)

(2021/C 481/24)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta domstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: CC

Defendant: VO

Question referred

Does the court of a Member State retain jurisdiction under Article 8(1) of the Brussels II Regulation (1) if the child concerned by the case changes his or her habitual residence during the proceedings from a Member State to a third country which is a party to the 1996 Hague Convention (see Article 61 of the regulation)?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1).

---
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

 

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Housing Programs Ltd. (the "Partnership"), for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as theequivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B.Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
Exhibit 10.18
                                                                   -------------



                               AMENDMENT NUMBER 2
                                     TO THE
                             DICTAPHONE CORPORATION
                          MANAGEMENT STOCK OPTION PLAN


     AMENDMENT, dated as of August 1, 1997, to the Dictaphone Corporation 
Management Stock Option Plan (the "Plan").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Dictaphone Corporation
(the "Company") has determined that it desires to amend the Plan to increase the
number of shares of Company common stock issuable thereunder and to make certain
clarifying changes; and

     WHEREAS, Section 11(b) of the Plan provides that the Board may amend the
Plan from time to time;

     NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

     1.   INCREASE IN SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN.  Section 2 of the Plan  is  hereby
amended by replacing the number 850,000 in each place it appears in such Section
with the number 1,200,000, and by deleting the second sentence of such Section.

     2.   CLARIFYING CHANGES.  (a) Section 6(e)(i) of the Plan is hereby amended
by (i)  deleting  the words "for up to  425,000  Option  Shares"  from the first
sentence thereof, (ii) deleting the words "prior to the fifth anniversary of the
Effective  Date"  where they  occur  preceding  the first  proviso to the second
sentence thereof:

          "and Service Options granted after the Effective Date shall
          vest and become exercisable in accordance with such
          schedules as may be established by the Board of Directors
          or the Committee"

     (b)  Section 6(e)(ii) of the Plan is hereby amended by (i) deleting the
words "for up to 425,000 Option Shares" from the first sentence thereof, (ii)
deleting the words "prior to the fifth anniversary of the Effective Date" where
they occur in the second sentence therof, and (iii) replacing all of the second
sentence thereof prior to the first proviso thereto with the following:

          "Performance Options shall become exercisable on the
          tenth anniversary of the relevant date of grant (prior to the
          expiration of such Options), unless sooner accelerated
          based on achieving (x) in the case of Performance Options
          granted on the Effective Date, the Target Enterprise

<PAGE>


          Values as set forth in Schedule I hereto, or (y) in the case
          of Performance Options granted after the Effective Date,
          such performance goals as may be established by the
          Board of Directors or the Committee."

     3.   EFFECTIVE DATE.  This Amendment Number 2 shall be effective as of the
date first above written.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Withdrawal of Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.

# SUMMARY:

The Shasta-Trinity National Forest is withdrawing its Notice of Intent issued on April 22, 2011, for preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the I-5 Corridor Fuels Reduction Project. No significant issues were identified during this scoping period or any other opportunity to comment. Upon further evaluation, it also appears that there are no potential significant impacts to the human environment associated with the project. As a result, the Forest is withdrawing its intent to prepare an EIS and is now preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA). All comments previously received regarding this project will be retained and considered in the development of the EA. If it is determined that the project may have significant impacts, the EIS process will be reinitiated and a notice of intent will be published.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Questions concerning this notice and requests to be added to the project mailing list should be directed to Andrew Spain, Shasta Lake Ranger District, Shasta-Trinity National Forest, 14225 Holiday Road, Redding, CA 96003. Telephone: (530) 242-5548. Email:                         *aspain@fs.fed.us.*                         Individuals who have previously submitted comments on this project will remain on the project mailing list and do not need to contact the Forest.                    

Dated: June 8, 2018.

Chris French,

Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System .

[FR Doc. 2018-14578 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3411-15-P