alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  CFO Certification

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Electronic Systems Technology Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jon Correio, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ JON CORREIO
Jon Correio                                                                        
Chief Financial Officer                                                               
Date:  March 24, 2009
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Axion International Holdings, Inc. (the
Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended herein as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Gary Anthony, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the
      Company.





Date:
      January 28, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      Gary AnthonyGary
      AnthonyChief
      Financial Officer
# C_2022294EN.01002901.xml

| 1.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Polo Club Düsseldorf v EUIPO — Company Bridge and Life (POLO CLUB DÜSSELDORF EST. 1976)

(Case T-355/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark POLO CLUB, DÜSSELDORF EST. 1976 - Earlier national figurative mark POLO CLUB - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2022/C 294/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Polo Club Düsseldorf GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: C. Weil, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Company Bridge and Life, SL (Elche, Spain) (represented by: J. Gracia Albero and D. Gómez Sánchez, lawyers)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Polo Club Düsseldorf GmbH & Co. KG, seeks, in essence, the annulment and alteration of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 April 2021 (Case R 1667/2020-1) (‘the contested decision’).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Polo Club Düsseldorf GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs, including those necessarily incurred by Company Bridge and Life, SL for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Polo Club Düsseldorf GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs, including those necessarily incurred by Company Bridge and Life, SL for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.

---
#### Robert JANKOWSKI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-436.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 20, 1968.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Marvin J. Emory, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Cross v. State, 96 Fla. 768, 119 So. 380.
#### GEORGE RHODES *vs.*WILLIAM SILVERS.

In case for malicious prosecution plff. must prove the prosecution, acquittal, want of probable cause and malice of deft.

Case, for malicious prosecution. Plea, non cul; issue.

*128This was an action for a malicious prosecution instituted by the deft, against the plff. before justice Paris, for a violation of the Sabbath day. *Upon*this charge the deft, obtained a state’s process against Rhodes, and had him arrested under circumstances of great outrage. The charge was founded upon the act of assembly of this state. *Digest*483.

*Harrington Justice,*

charged the jury that it was incumbent on the plff. to prove the prosecution commenced and conducted at the instigation of the déft.; the termination of that prosecution in favor of the accused; the want of probable cause for the prosecution, and the malicious motive of the deft.

That the damages were in the discretion of the jury, and should he proportioned to the damage the plff. had sustained, and the aggravation of the case by the very violent means made use of in the arrest and detention of the accused. Some legal damage must be made out; but the arrest of the person, or his detention however short, and the expense incurred by the accused in consequence of the accusation, should be considered in fixing the amount of the damages.

The jury gave a verdict for $122 00.
#### Ethel C. PEIRCE, etc., v. Gertrude L. CROCKER et al.

No. 6093.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Nov. 19, 1936.

Ivor Jeffreys, of Chicago, 111., for appellant.

John S. Lord, C. H. G. Heinfelden, and A. C. Wetterstrom, all of Chicago, 111., for appellee.

Before EVANS and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On motion of counsel f'or appellants and pursuant to stipulation of counsel, it is ordered and adjudged that this cause be docketed in this court, and that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed without costs to either party, that each party pay his own costs in this court and in the court below, and that the bond for damages executed by appellants and surety thereon be canceled, and the liability of the obligators discharged. It is further ordered that the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.
#### Solomon Dean ISREAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-422.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 29, 1971.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Vera Winter Lee, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*746PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD IC., and RAWLS, JJ„ concur.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1147 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 131 ) IV-E-4 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:54

PM Sheet 131 of 242P. 2 

# Km? UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y AN N ARBOR.'VHCHIGA N 4810 5 OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N 

## SEP / I 198 7

MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : Measuremen t o f Undergroun d Tan k Emptying Losse s b y Su n Oi l Compan

y FROM :
TO : THRU : Joh

n F . Anderson , Senio r Projec t Man a Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Br a Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1 Cheste r J . France , Chief^,- ^ Standard s Developmen t aiWS u nch

On Augus t 17 , 198 7 I spok e wit h Mr . Jac k Freeman t o obtai n detail s abou t testing Su n Oi l ha s bee n doing t o measur e emptying an

d breathing losse s fro mundergroun

d gasolin e storag e tanks . Theyha

d reportedl yno t foun d an yemission s fro

mtank s equippe d wit h ven t valves . Mr . Freema n explaine d thei r procedur e an d confirme d th

e fac t tha t thei r measurement s detecte d no outflo wfro mthe tan

k vent s teste d during routin e statio n use . B ythe us e o f a pai r o f one-wa

ybal l valves , Su n wa s abl e t o separat e inflowfro m outflo wan

d measure d eac h wit h ga s meters . Mr . Freema n sai d the averag e inflowwa s abou t 3 0 percen t o f th e volume o f the fue l dispensed , an d tha t ther e wa s no outflo wa t an ytim e (da y or night) . Measurement s wer e take n a t tw o stations , on e o f whic h wa s ope n 2 4 hour s a day . interestingly , Mr . Freeman note d tha t the typ e o f chec k valv e whic h the yus e i s neve r completel ysealed . I t i s designe d t o maintai n a smal l opening a t al l times . Eve n so , i t appeare d t o provid e sufficien t flow restrictio n t o eliminat e tan k breathing .
Exhibit 23.1








Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








The Board of Directors


Hyperdynamics Corporation


Houston, Texas





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 12, 2006 (File No. 333-130976); the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2008 (File No. 333-149774); and the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 23, 2008 (File No. 333-148287), of our report dated September 30, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2008 and for the year ended June 30, 2008 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hyperdynamics Corporation.








/s/ Malone & Bailey, PC


Houston, Texas


www.malone-bailey.com





September 30, 2008
#### Stanley B. GOLDBERG and Joyce Goldberg, his wife, Petitioners, v. Walter S. MACKAUF et al., Respondents.

No. 44108.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 17, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 280 So.2d 71.

ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DE-KLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, Acting- C. J., dissents.
# C_2021189EN.01001201.xml

| 17.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Constitucional (Portugal) lodged on 3 March 2021 — Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira v VectorImpacto — Automóveis Unipessoal Lda.

(Case C-136/21)

(2021/C 189/13)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Constitucional

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Respondent: VectorImpacto — Automóveis Unipessoal Lda

Question referred

Can Article 110 TFEU, either on its own or in conjunction with Article 191 TFEU, particularly paragraph 2 thereof, be interpreted as not precluding a rule of national law which fails to take account of the environmental component when applying reductions reflecting the average depreciation in the value of vehicles in the national market to the tax levied on second-hand vehicles with a permanent registration plate issued by other Member States of the European Union, thereby enabling the amount of tax calculated in accordance with this provision to be more than the tax levied on equivalent domestic second-hand vehicles?

---
# C_2022266EN.01002701.xml

| 11.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/27

---

Order of the General Court of 7 April 2022 — Mendus v EUIPO — (CENSOR.NET)

(Case T-336/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 266/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Iaroslav Mendus (Kyiv, Ukraine) (represented by: P. Kurcman, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Re:

By document lodged at the Court Registry on 15 June 2021, the applicant brought the present action for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 April 2021 (Case R 1225/2020-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign CENSOR.NET as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Mr Iaroslav Mendus. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Mr Iaroslav Mendus.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,865
<SECURITIES>                                       347
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,450
<ALLOWANCES>                                       996
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,633
<DEPRECIATION>                                      98
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         38,371
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           240
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   149,333
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,008
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,457
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,025
<INCOME-TAX>                                       979
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,047
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,047
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
#### NORTH AMERICAN ROCKWELL CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Petitioner, v. Charles Samuel MOYER, an incompetent, by and through William Trickel, Jr., as Guardian of the Estate of the person of Charles Samuel Moyer, an Incompetent, Respondents.

No. 70-305.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 24, 1970.

Certiorari dismissed.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 584

Requesting that the Secretary of the Interior withdraw proposed regulations

concerning rights-of-way granted under section 2477 of the Revised Statutes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1994

Mr. ORTON (for himself, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, and Mr. HANSEN) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Natural

Resources

RESOLUTION

Requesting that the Secretary of the Interior withdraw proposed regulations concerning rights-of-way granted under

section 2477 of the Revised Statutes.

Whereas in 1866 the Congress established, through section

2477 of the Revised Statutes, a procedure for granting

rights-of-way across unreserved public lands to local governments to ensure reasonable access by the public to

and across public lands and resources;

Whereas thousands of such valid rights-of-way were conveyed

to State and local governments through this mechanism

until the statute was repealed by section 706 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (90 Stat.

2793);
2

•HRES 584 IH

Whereas section 701 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2786; 43 U.S.C. 1701

note) specifically recognized and protected all valid existing rights-of-way granted under section 2477 of the Revised Statutes;

Whereas these rights-of-way are valid property rights held in

trust for the public by State and local governments;

Whereas these rights-of-way continue to be critical to ensuring access to and across public lands;

Whereas there is an established body of case law, legislative

history, historical precedents, and departmental decisions

that does not appear to be reflected in the proposed regulations of the Department of the Interior affecting these

rights-of-way;

Whereas the proposed regulations appear to substantially

conflict with existing law and congressional intent to such

an extent that the established public comment process is

inadequate to address the many fundamental problems

raised by the proposed regulations; and

Whereas it appears that the proposed regulations seek to exceed the authority granted to the Department of the Interior under the Constitution, through political and legal

precedent, and by Executive order: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives requests

2 that the Secretary of the Interior—

3 (1) withdraw the proposed regulations regard4 ing rights-of-way granted under section 2477 of the

5 Revised Statutes; and
3

•HRES 584 IH

1 (2) reissue the proposed regulations for public

2 review and comment only after the proposed regula3 tions have been redrafted to adequately reflect and

4 comply with all pertinent laws, Executive orders,

5 rules, regulations, and historical and legal prece6 dents.

Æ
Hide Options Show Options


×
 Digitally signed by Pagefreezer Signature:
                    Archive Date:
                    End Date:


PDF export
                        ×
                We are preparing your PDF. Downloading will start momentarily.

                    Please try again later.


1st snapshot
 2nd snapshot
 Compare Close


Compare Web Pages Compare
 ×
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1165 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1165

    To provide for judicial review of Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
decisions on petitions for enforcement actions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 25 (legislative day, June 22), 1993

  Mr. Lieberman (for himself and Mr. Baucus) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for judicial review of Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
decisions on petitions for enforcement actions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be referred to as the ``Nuclear Enforcement 
Accountability Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT PETITIONS AND JUDICIAL REVIEW.

    Section 189 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2239) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``d. Enforcement Petitions.--
            ``(1) In general.--Any person may petition the Nuclear 
        Regulatory Commission to institute a proceeding to modify, 
        suspend, or revoke a license, or for such other action as may 
        be proper.
            ``(2) Standards for granting.--The Commission shall grant 
        any request under paragraph (1) if the petitioner demonstrates 
        material evidence reasonably indicating that--
                    ``(i) the holder of the license with respect to 
                which a request has been made under paragraph (1) is in 
                significant noncompliance with the terms of the 
                license, this chapter, or the Commission's regulations, 
                or
                    ``(ii) the activities of the license present a 
                substantial hazard to the public health and safety or 
                common defense and security.
            ``(3) Judicial review.--Any Commission order denying a 
        request under this subsection shall be subject to judicial 
        review in accordance with chapter 158 of title 28, United 
        States Code, and chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code.''.

                                 <all>
```
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 327

Providing for the hour of meeting of the House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 25, 1994

Mr. MOAKLEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Providing for the hour of meeting of the House.

1 Resolved, That until otherwise ordered, the hour of

2 meeting of the House shall be noon on Mondays and Tues3 days; 2 p.m. on Wednesdays; 11 a.m. on all other days

4 of the week up to and including May 15, 1994; and that

5 from May 16, 1994, until the end of the second session,

6 the hour of daily meeting of the House shall be noon on

7 Mondays and Tuesdays and 10 a.m. on all other days of

8 the week.

Æ
#### ASSOCIATES DISCOUNT CORPORATION v. Frank DOBBINS.

No. 47129.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 7, 1973.

Dan Coit, Meridian, Billy E. Harris, Quitman, for appellant.

Riddell & Dabbs, Quitman, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clarke County; Lester F. Williamson, Judge.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., RODGERS, P. J., and PATTERSON, SMITH, ROBERTSON and WALKER, JJ.

Affirmed.