alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                  ------------
         Section 1350 Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and
                           Principal Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of 1st Independence
Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2007 (the  "Report") of the Company  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  and  the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 6, 2007       /s/ N. William White
                                --------------------------------
                                Name:     N. William White
                                Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)


                            /s/ R. Michael Wilbourn
                                --------------------------------
                                Name:     R. Michael Wilbourn
                                Title:    Executive Vice President
                                          and Chief Financial Officer
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2022418EN.01003301.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 September 2022 — Voco v EUIPO (Shape of packaging)

(Case T-700/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark - Shape of packaging - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2022/C 418/44)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Voco GmbH (Cuxhaven, Germany) (represented by: C. Spintig and S. Pietzcker, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 August 2021 (Case R 117/2021-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Voco GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Voco GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 2, 3.1.2022.

---
# C_2023007EN.01001101.xml

| 9.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Eircom Limited v Commission for Communications Regulation

(Case C-494/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Electronic communications networks and services - Universal service and users’ rights - Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive) - Article 12 - Costing and financing of universal service obligations - Single universal service provider and multiple telecommunications services providers operating in the market - Determination as to whether an unfair burden exists)

(2023/C 7/13)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court (Ireland)

Parties to the main proceedings

Plaintiff: Eircom Limited

Defendant: Commission for Communications Regulation

Notice parties: Vodafone Ireland Limited, Three Ireland (Hutchison) Limited, Three Ireland Services (Hutchison) Limited

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 12 and 13 of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive),

must be interpreted as requiring the competent national regulatory authority, in order to determine whether the net cost of universal service obligations represents an unfair burden on an operator entrusted with such obligations, to examine the characteristics particular to that operator, taking account of its situation relative to that of its competitors in the relevant market.

---

(1)  OJ C 431, 25.10.2021.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Sierra Health Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony M. Marlon, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          13,384
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,658
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,200
<INVENTORY>                                     15,225
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,767
<PP&E>                                       4,000,490
<DEPRECIATION>                                 781,243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,184,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,029,996
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           116
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,054,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                        306,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               306,678
<CGS>                                          250,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  250,270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               648,942
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,583
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (592,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (592,534)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (592,534)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,899
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,166
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (300)
<INVENTORY>                                    166,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               250,549
<PP&E>                                         472,929
<DEPRECIATION>                               (210,233)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 552,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,528
<BONDS>                                        230,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,000
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     177,079
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   552,805
<SALES>                                        687,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               687,050
<CGS>                                          564,889
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  594,835
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,157)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (400)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,027
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,180
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,847
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,847
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1



I, Michel de Rosen, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the registrant, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ViroPharma
Incorporated.



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHEL DE
ROSEN                                                   
|Michel de Rosen                                                          
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
|August 5, 2004
#### CITY OF DANIA, a municipal corporation, Petitioner, v. Gary Ronald TAFT, Respondent.

No. 73-994.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 8, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
    Dated: March 26 , 2009
    By:
    /s/ RODNEY E. OLSONRodney E. OlsonChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
# Forwarded by Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/06/2010 08:58 PM

From: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: "Michael Laney" < mnl@rti.org >

Date: 07/29/2010 03:19 PM

Subject: Emailing: New Facilities List.xlsx

Updated list of new facilities.

Keith W. Barnett

USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

Mail Code D243

‐ 02

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

919

‐ 541

‐ 5605

barnett.keith@epa.gov

(See attached file: New Facilities List.xlsx)SumterCementCompanyCenterHillFLPosponedCancelledNANANameLocationCurrentStartDateinPCAData EstimatedNewDateSubjecttoNewNSPS NewSource‐NESHAPCemex(South)Brooksville,FL2008NoYesCemexNewBraunfels,TX 2008NoYesContinentalCementHannibal,MO2008NoNo‐ThiskilnburnshazardouswasteTexasIndustriesOroGrande,CA2008NoYesAmericanCementCo.Sumterville,FL2009NoYesAshGroveCementForemen,AR2009NoNo‐ThiskilnburnshazardouswasteBuzziUnicemFestus,MO2009NoYesEagleMaterialsFernley,NVPosponedUnknownNANAEssrocCementMartinsburg,WV2009NoYesGCCAmericaPueblo,CO2009NoYesHolcimSt.Genevieve,MO 2009NoYesTexasIndustriesNewBraunfels,TX PosponedCancelledNoNADrakeCementPaulden,Arizona 20102010NoNoFloridaRockNewberry,Florida 20102010NoNoGiantCement/KeystoneBath,Pennsylvania 20102010NoNo‐ThiskilnburnshazardouswasteLafargeHarleyvile,SC20102010NoYesSumterCementCompanyCenterHillFL,PosponedCancelledNANACalPortlandRilliot,CAPosponed2013 Note1YesYesCemexSeligman,AZ20122013YesYesEagleMaterialsLaramie,WYPosponedCancelled Note2 NANAHoustonAmericanCementPerry,GA20122013 Note3YesYesLehighMitchell,IN20122013 Note4YesYesTitanAmericaCastleHayne,NC 20122013 Note5YesYesLafargeGainChain,IL20132013 Note6YesYesNationalCementRagland,AL20132013 Note7YesYesNSPSProposalDate‐June16,2808NESHAPProposalDate‐December2,2005forMercury,THC,andHClNote1‐basedconversationwithCalPortland,JayGradyNote2‐BasedonconversationwithEagleMaterialsNote3‐basednnewspaperarticlestatingfacilityIonholduntil2012andassuming2yearstoconstruct‐Jan2012untilDecember2013Note4‐ConversationwithTimMatz‐LehighNote5‐BasedonassessmentofwhereTitanisinpermittingprocessNote6‐basedonconversationwithMikePelan,LafargeNote7‐basedonconversationwithJohnHolmes,consultanttoNationalCement
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-41329

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PEDRO CHAVEZ RODRIGUEZ, JR., also known as Pedro Rodriguez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:04-CR-560-1

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Pedro Chavez Rodriguez, Jr., has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has filed a response. The record is insufficiently

developed to allow consideration at this time of Rodriguez’s claims of ineffective

assistance of counsel; such a claim generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal

when the claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 21, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-41329 Document: 00511640770 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
No. 10-41329

existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v.

Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions

of the record reflected therein, as well as Rodriguez’s response. We concur with

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, Rodriguez’s

motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-41329 Document: 00511640770 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 0.6834
<CASH>                                           5,304
<SECURITIES>                                       560
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,340
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     14,170
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,642
<PP&E>                                         899,123
<DEPRECIATION>                                 174,549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 840,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          114,057
<BONDS>                                        449,759
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       397,369
<OTHER-SE>                                   (202,796)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   840,329
<SALES>                                         66,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,940
<CGS>                                           52,290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,914
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (139,083)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,261
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (140,134)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (140,134)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.98)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.98)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>USING US GAAP AND SFAS 128, BASIC AND DILUTED EPS ARE BOTH $(1.13).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Winnie Love SONES v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 53224.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 19, 1973.

In re: Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, United Benefit Life Insurance Company and Employers Commercial Union Insurance Company, of America apply for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Ouachita. 272 So.2d 739.

Application denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, its judgment is correct.