alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, William A. Carter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
November 8, 2010





/s/ William A. CarterWilliam
      A. Carter, M.D.Chief
      Executive Officer




1
NEW MEXCO ENVRONMENTAL W CENTER July 16, 2010 The Honorable Lisa Jackson Administrator united States Environmental Protection Agency
By electronic mail Arid Rios Building (livnat.alexander@epa.gov) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mail Code: 11OIA Washington,
DC 20460 Re: Request for Public Hearings
onthe Proposed Coal Ash Rule and Request for Extension of the Comment Period Dear Administrator Jackson: I write for the New Mexico Environmental Law Center (the Law Center) concerning the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) proposed public hearings concerning the proposed coal ash rule. Throughout
the country, citizens are expressing great interest
in conveying their knowledge and experiences directly
tothe APA. According

tothe federal register notice, EPA will be accepting such requestsuntil July 21, 2010. We hope that all such requestswill be duly considered. It is critical that the voices of the most affected communities

be heard in this process.

It has cometoourattention that citizens and groups
in Western Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Georgia, and the Ohio Valley areinterested

in attending
anEPA public hearing. All of these areashave endured significant adverse impacts from coal ash mismanagement.

We therefore support the requestsfor public hearings

in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Roane County, Tennessee, Atlanta, Georgia; and Louisville, Kentucky. We also are requesting

a 60-day extension

tothe public comment period toensuretime for sufficient public hearings and toensurethat the many complex issues presented

in the proposed rule are adequately addressed. Thank youin advance for yourconsideration

of these requests. Your ru1y, 4 DougldMeiklejohn Executye Director

/ Copy: Steve Souders, EPA (SoudersSteve@epam ?jJpgpy) 1405 Luisa Street, Suite 5, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 Phone (505) 989-9022
Fax (505) 989-3769 nmelc@nmelc.org Printedonelementalchlorinefree.100%recycled poshconsumer, recycledpaper
<PAGE>   1




                                                                    EXHIBIT 12


GTE North Incorporated and Subsidiary

STATEMENT OF THE CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Six Months Ended
                                                                      June 30, 1997
                                                                   --------------------

<S>                                                                <C>
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income from continuing operations                                $            334,538
  Add - Income taxes                                                            197,772
        - Fixed charges                                                          68,014
                                                                   --------------------
Adjusted earnings                                                  $            600,324
                                                                   ====================

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                                 $             63,226
  Portion of rent expense
      representing interest                                                       4,788
                                                                   --------------------
Adjusted fixed charges                                             $             68,014
                                                                   ====================

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                                 8.83

</TABLE>
#### Marilyn JACOBS, Appellant, v. Ruth L. SUTTON, Justice of the Peace, Third District of Dade County, Florida, et al., Appellees.

No. 40658.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 7, 1972.

Eugene P. Spellman, Miami, for appellant.

Richard E. Gerstein, State’s Atty. and Richard J. Registro, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

By direct appeal appellant attacks the constitutionality of Fla.Stats. §§ 37.21, 923.04, and 923.05, F.S.A., providing respectively: grounds for issuance of a peace warrant; form for petition for peace warrant; and form for peace warrant. In our judgment appellant’s arguments are substantially without merit, and the statutes in question comport with the requirements of the Florida and Federal Constitutions.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., and SPECTOR, District Court Judge, concur.

CARLTON, J., dissents.
SERVED: March 8, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

~ , ') :.·. ':' ! I .... _, , .,.L ~ t' '. • i 

In The Matter Of: 

AERIAL CROP 

PROTECTION, INC. 

Respondent 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2012-1262 

·caseNo. 20liS0190332 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On March 7, 2013, an Order Reserving Respondent's Motion, Directing the FAA to File 

a Supplemental Statement, and Granting/Denying Other Relief was filed. Among other things, 

this Order reserved the Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and ordered 

the FAA to file a supplemental statement in support of its Motion for Decision on the Pleadings 

or in the Alternative, Motion for Hearing on Sanction Only. 

Later that same day, on March 7, 2013, the FAA filed a Withdrawal of Complaint stating 

that the. parties had reached a settlement. 

After reviewing all relevant caselaw, decisions, regulations, statutory authority, and being · 

fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The parties' pending motions are deemed moot. 

2. The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference set for March 19, 201), at 11:00 a.m. 

Eastern time is cancelled. 

3, Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the FAA has withdrawn its Complaint, and this 

proceeding is·dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention:· Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Ms. Andrea Michelle Harper, Esq. 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 561·}99-9910 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

. Mr. Preston J. Fields, Sr., Esq. 

Respondent's Counsel 

Preston J. Fields, P.A. 

11211 Prosperity Farms Rd., Ste. C-301 

Palm Beach, FL 33410 

TEL: 561-799-9910 

FAX: 561-799-0388 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

ONE COPY 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-1262 

(Civil Penalty Action) . 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal · 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 

20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 131 (Monday, July 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14585]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on Hedge IV

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 11, 2018, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research Institute--
Cooperative Research Group on HEDGE IV (``HEDGE IV'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Volkswagen Group 
of America, Inc., Herndon, VA, has been added as a party to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and HEDGE IV intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On February 14, 2017, HEDGE IV filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on March 27, 2017 (82 FR 15238).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 30, 
2018. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on June 5, 2018 (83 FR 26092).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-14585 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
# C_2022095EN.01004503.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/45

---

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Yajun (PREMILITY)

(Case T-46/21) (1)

(2022/C 95/65)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.

---
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MARK E. SANBORN,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,

Respondent.

______________________

2013-3046

______________________

Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board in 

case no. DA315H110431-B-1.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Mark E. Sanborn, moves without opposition for a 60-

day extension of time to file his principal brief.

Upon Consideration Thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. The petitioner’s brief is due on 

or before April 30, 2013.

Case: 13-3046 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 02/27/2013
 MARK SANBORN v. ARMY 2

FOR THE COURT

 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly

 Clerk

s27

Case: 13-3046 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 02/27/2013
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 567

Honoring the memory of the late Claude Harris, Jr.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 4, 1994

Mr. HILLIARD (for himself, Mr. BEVILL, Mr. BROWDER, Mr. CRAMER, Mr.

CALLAHAN, Mr. EVERETT, and Mr. BACHUS of Alabama) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Honoring the memory of the late Claude Harris, Jr.

Whereas Claude Harris, Jr., was a native Alabamian, born in

Bessemer, and later residing in Tuscaloosa, Alabama;

Whereas Claude Harris, Jr., was a Member of the House of

Representatives from 1987 to 1993;

Whereas Claude Harris, Jr., served admirably on the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Agriculture, and Veterans’ Affairs;

Whereas, at his death, Claude Harris, Jr., was the United

States Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama;

Whereas Claude Harris, Jr., was a man of rare strength and

courage, tempered by true compassion and love;
2

•HRES 567 IH

Whereas Claude Harris, Jr., was a man seen by his peers as

a statesman, a gentleman, and a good friend;

Whereas Claude Harris, Jr., displayed courage as he gallantly

fought against his cancer; and

Whereas Claude Harris, Jr., will be sorely missed, not only

by his former colleagues in the Congress, but also by all

true lovers of democracy and freedom: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors

2 the memory of the late Claude Harris, Jr., a former

3 Representative.

4 SEC. 2. The Clerk of the House of Representatives

5 shall transmit a copy of this resolution to the family of

6 the late Claude Harris, Jr.

Æ
#### WILLIAM HUKILL, deft. b. appellant, *vs.*ROBERT BAILEY, plff. b. appellate.

Appeal from the judgment of John Conwell, Esq. a justice of the peace.

This was an action againt a constable for neglecting to return an execution at the suit of Bailey against James Spencer, delivered to him to be executed. The plaintiff declared in debt on the statute and the deft demurred generally and specially. *Dig.*341, *sec.*IS.

*Booth,*for plff.

*Read, Jr. for deft*

*Note.*This was before the supplement (8 *vol. 265,)*which gives jurisdiction to the justices of the peace.

The court sustained the demurrer on the authority of *Humphries*vs. *Webster, ante*34.

The remedy is by action on the case founded on the neglect of duty and consequent statutory liability. Perhaps debt on the statute would lie. Chitty says whenever a statute imposes a penalty, debt will lie. Quere.—Is not this a penalty?

Judgment for demurrant.
* Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30516 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus KIM ANDREA WEBB, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CR-50086

- - - - - - - - - - December 18, 1997 Before WISDOM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM: * Kim Andrea Webb pleaded guilty to count 5 of an indictment charging him with wire fraud and has appealed the district court’s restitution order. Webb contends that the restitution order was imposed in violation of the Victim and Witness Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3663. Because Webb failed to object to the restitution order in the district court, we review this issue under the plain error standard. See United States v.No. 97-30516 -2- Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc) (citing United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 730-35 (1993)). Webb concedes that the victims of his “employment testing” scheme are entitled to restitution. He argues, however, that certain other victims were who were enticed to extend credit to him for airline tickets and hotel rooms were victims of an entirely different scheme and were not entitled to restitution under § 3663(a)(1). Webb has not shown that the error is plain and has affected his substantial rights. See Olano , 507 U.S. at 732-35. Moreover, the issue presented involves a question of fact. “[Q]uestions of fact capable of resolution by the district court upon proper objection at sentencing can never constitute plain
error.” United States v. McCaskey , 9 F.3d 368, 376 (5th Cir. 1993) (internal quotation marks omitted). The judgment is
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CITADEL TECHNOLOGY, INC. (FORMERLY CITADEL COMPUTERS
SYSTEMS INCORPORATED) FOR THE YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                           8,555
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  435,615
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               950,150
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,163,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,397,129
<BONDS>                                        478,044
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         51
<COMMON>                                       257,813
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,028,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,163,034
<SALES>                                      1,613,326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,613,326
<CGS>                                           78,429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               368,897
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             128,929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,522,710)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,522,710)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022284EN.01003701.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/37

---

Order of the General Court of 20 May 2022 — VP v Cedefop

(Case T-534/21) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Temporary staff - Request for renewal of a contract for an indefinite period - Decision not to renew - Action for annulment and for damages - Actionable measure - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2022/C 284/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: VP (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (represented by: A. Guillerme, T. Bontinck, L. Burguin and T. Payan, lawyers)

Re:

By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant, VP, seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) of 2 March 2021 and, secondly, compensation for the damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | VP shall bear her own costs as well as the costs incurred by European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop), including the costs of the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

VP shall bear her own costs as well as the costs incurred by European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop), including the costs of the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 431, 25.10.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          97,818
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,389,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,890
<INVENTORY>                                  3,310,550
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,681,041
<PP&E>                                       3,678,995
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,642,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,904,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,687,079
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,401
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,626,540
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,904,031
<SALES>                                      2,989,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,032,202
<CGS>                                        1,957,321
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  502,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                517,867
<INCOME-TAX>                                   210,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   307,267
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>