alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
115 0 Chariwel l Caniag e Wa y S

Eas t Lansing . M I 4SS2 3 l-cbruai- y7 , 201 2 Docke t Managcincn l Facilil y U.S . Depl . ofTransporiaiio n Docke t No . r.AA-2012-00S 9 1200Nc\ v Jerse y Ave . Sf i Wes t Buildin g Glan dl-loor . Roo mW-12014 0 Washinmon . D C 2059 0 

### x'-ARTMtNTO F •RAMSPORiATIO M •'nKn'OPFRATiON S 

### m i Ft C !E

5 3

RI: : Su nCountr y Slo t

I:.\cmptio nDocke t

No . FAA-2012-00S 9 T o Who mI

I Ma v Concern : Su nCountr y currentl y operate s dail y non-sto p tliglU s fro mLansing . Michigan , l o Washington' s Reaga nAirpor t an dback . Th e llighl s ar c currentl y se t u p t o allo w individual s t o actuall y perlbr mwor k activitie s o nth e da y o f th e (ligh t

durin g anorma l work day . Operatin g i

nLansin g for

jus t th e pas t te nmonths , 48,00 0 passenger s hav e flow nthi s rout e an dth e deman dlo r th e servic e ha s increase dsignillcantly . Thi s servic e provide s ou r

governmen t

official s wit hth e abilit y l o complet e task s an dwor k i naver y cfUcien t manne r i neithe r location . I

naddition , th e servic e allow s academic s an dothe r professional s fro mMichiga nStat e Universit y t o mee t wit hU.S . governmen t agencie s i

na timel y manne r

withou t signillcantl y impactin g classroo mschedule s an dresearc h activities . Michiga nSlat e Universit y i s on e o f th e 1 0 larges t

universitie s inth e countrV ; a s wel l a s havin g on e o f th e larges t

internationa l studen t

bodie s i nth e U.S . Bein g abl e t o interac t i natimel y manne r

withWashington . D C i s essentia l t o th e functionin g o f thi s majo r university . Pleas e conside r

thes e factor s i

ndecidin g Su nCountry' s fate wit hrespec t t o continuin g l o offe r ihei r non-sto p ilight s t o an dfro mWashingto nDC . Man y people , beside s nic , lov e thi s servic e an dwis hi

t t o continue . Sincerely . . . <^i::^

- 

# (P'^J^^^^ ^ Pi^ ^ Lind aKohl . Ph.D

-

i;-"v;,. : \\i:y.-•••'.' . * i; q"=< ; qc;;j.;?u< " i«>' . • ^ ^ "

- . - ' ' . .••"•.:';: . ;;^;i(_ : :•;•-?•'- • i u r -j . ••; • '•. -.•.T : I ::'. • ^i.'Gi.:r,.' ' • ; ;"':.i^!;;'" i '..:,: . ..• : ; " . : : • ' ; • . • " •'' • -:-• ' •••••!•'•' "

• -• . • 1 ;':;•; • . : •) • !' \" i •'•-. . . \." • • ' . " . • ' " '•'•','• ' • • • '- '
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MACKIE
DESIGNS INC.'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS 
OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,126,610
<SECURITIES>                                 9,487,637
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,829,202
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,434,156)
<INVENTORY>                                 35,611,548
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            83,715,464
<PP&E>                                      32,711,275
<DEPRECIATION>                             (9,661,805)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             120,743,268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       39,254,405
<BONDS>                                     24,804,169
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    28,451,991
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,664,342
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               120,743,268
<SALES>                                     66,117,081
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            66,117,081
<CGS>                                       40,376,706
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               40,376,706
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,360,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (804,911)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,196,378
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,940,566
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,230,212
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,230,212
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6653

JERRY NATHAN DEAL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, SCDC Commissioner; CHARLES M.

CONDON, Attorney General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-1676-0-21)

Submitted: December 8, 1998 Decided: January 13, 1999

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Nathan Deal, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Deal appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Deal v. Moore, No. CA-97-1676-0-21 (D.S.C. Mar. 27, 1998).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Golden  Enterprises,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the third  quarter ended  February 29, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Patty Townsend, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   April 12, 2004



/s/ Patty Townsend
------------------
Patty Townsend
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



                                       19
#### Charles R. FREEMAN, Appellant, v. Barbara Lynne FREEMAN, Appellee.

No. 72-243.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 28, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 10, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Rita Marie NORTHEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-556.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 8, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1




                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------

                              RASTER GRAPHICS, INC.

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-13165) pertaining to the 1988 Stock Option Plan,
1996 Stock Plan, 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 1996 Directors' Stock
Option Plan of Raster Graphics, Inc. of our report dated January 24, 1997
(except for Note 13, as to which the date is March 8, 1997) with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Raster Graphics, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


         Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Raster
Graphics, Inc., listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



San Jose, California
March 28, 1997
# C_2021382EN.01000702.xml

| 20.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 22 March 2021 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v GE

(Case C-173/21)

(2021/C 382/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG

Defendant: GE

The case was removed from the register of the Court of Justice by order of the President of the Court of 14 June 2021.

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Section 302 Certification**

 

I, Strauss Zelnick, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| January 9, 2015 | /s/ STRAUSS ZELNICK                                        |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Strauss Zelnick 

*Chairman   and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ViroPharma Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Vincent J. Milano                
|Vincent J. Milano                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|April 28, 2010                       



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Charles A. Rowland, Jr.
|Charles A. Rowland, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer    

April 28, 2010

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     fds
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000946822
<NAME>                        @dfsy5eu
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         18,250
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  208,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,474
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               840,702
<PP&E>                                         268,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                 50,251
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,639,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,509,995
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10,941
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,819,953)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,639,115
<SALES>                                        269,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               269,496
<CGS>                                          293,771
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  720,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               82
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             57,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (801,839)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (801,839)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (801,839)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.08)
        


</TABLE>
# C_2023112EN.01003201.xml

| 27.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2023 –PBL and WA v Commission

(Case T-538/21) (1)

(State aid - Aid to a professional football club - Refusal to register a complaint lodged by one of the members of a football club - Status of interested party)

(2023/C 112/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Penya Barça Lyon: Plus que des supporters (PBL) (Bron, France) and WA (represented by: J. Branco, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and G. Braga da Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action, the applicants seek, under Article 263 TFEU, first, annulment of the Commission’s decision COMP.C.4/AH/mdr 2021(092342) of 1 September 2021 on the status of a complaint submitted in connection with alleged State aid granted to the Paris Saint-Germain football club (SA.64489), and, second, directions to be issued to the European Commission.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders Penya Barça Lyon: Plus que des supporters (PBL) and WA to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Penya Barça Lyon: Plus que des supporters (PBL) and WA to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 431, 25.10.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,058
<PP&E>                                       1,122,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                 801,984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 351,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,063
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   351,416
<SALES>                                        138,672
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               138,672
<CGS>                                           53,838
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  44
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 84,259
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,797
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             50,462
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    50,462
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Arnold SMITH v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, Section “A”.

No. 53876.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 11, 1973.

In re: Arnold Smith applying for writs of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Granted. See Order.

ORDER

In this matter, the application, with annexed documents and the return of the trial judge, dated September 19, 1973, having been duly considered,

It is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that an out-of-time-appeal be and the same is hereby granted to applicant Arnold Smith from his conviction and sentence in the proceeding entitled State of Louisiana v. Arnold Smith, No. 224-868, on the Docket of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, said sentence dated October 13, 1972.

It is Further Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the said Arnold Smith, applicant herein, shall have ninety (90) days from and after the date hereof within which to perfect said out-of-time-appeal.

It is Further Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the Orleans Parish Indigent Defenders’ Board shall prosecute said appeal on behalf of said Arnold Smith, without delay and in a thorough and professional manner, making such motions for extensions of time to the Judge of the District Court as may be necessary and proper under the circumstances.
#### Virginia Fleming et al., Appellants, v Michael Beckerman et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[655 NYS2d 986]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated July 3, 1996, which denied their motion to vacate an order of the same court, dated March 15, 1994, dismissing the complaint upon their default in appearing for argument of the defendant Michael Beckerman’s motion to compel discovery.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

*562The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the order dismissing the complaint *(see, Khavkin v Green Park Essex,*199 AD2d 468; *Nadel v Breitfeld,*188 AD2d 645; *Long Is. Trust Co. v PTI Intl. Corp.,*166 AD2d 504; *Chery v Anthony,*156 AD2d 414). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 62 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 62

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
 investigations and studies by the Committee on Education and Labor in 
          the first session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February, 3, 1993

Mr. Ford of Michigan (for himself, Mr. Williams, Mr. Goodling, and Mrs. 
Roukema) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
 investigations and studies by the Committee on Education and Labor in 
          the first session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

    Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and studies by 
the Committee on Education and Labor (hereinafter in this resolution 
referred to as the ``Committee''), including expenses for--
            (1) procurement of consultant services under section 202(i) 
        of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946; and
            (2) provision of assistance for members of professional 
        staff obtaining specialized training under section 202(j) of 
        such Act;
there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House not more 
than $4,036,251.
    (b) Not more than $100,000 of the amount specified in subsection 
(a) may be used for consultant services referred to in paragraph (1) of 
such subsection and not more than $10,000 of such amount may be used 
for specialized training referred to in paragraph (2) of such 
subsection.
    Sec. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers 
authorized by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, 
and approved by the Committee on House Administration.
    Sec. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolution for 
investigations and studies carried on during the period beginning at 
noon on January 3, 1993, and ending immediately before noon on January 
3, 1994.
    Sec. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution shall be 
expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on 
House Administration.

                                 <all>
```
#### 255 Pinelawn Co. et al., Respondents-Appellants, v Continental Insurance Company, Appellant-Respondent.

[656 NYS2d 881]

Appeal by the defendant from so much of an order *432of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), dated March 11, 1996, as denied its motion, *inter alia,*for a discovery sanction pursuant to CPLR 3126 and, *sua sponte,*ordered the plaintiffs to file a note of issue forthwith. Cross appeal by the plaintiffs, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, as denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Lally at the Supreme Court. Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.