alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Swanson, Brian (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: Cc: 

### Subject: Ridenour, Phil <PRidenou@washco-md.net> Wednesday, June 13, 2012 1:21 PM Swanson, Brian (OSD; Devany, Dennis (OST) Larsen, Greg; David Hackett; Tom Cooper HGR Comments


### Good afternoon Dennis and Brian, 

## DOl-**05f'-2.00ftt~**

## 2.6220

Afterreceiving the e-mail below from DavidHackettrepresenting SunAir, LLC, HagerstownRegional Airport concurs thatthe Essential Air Servicecontract shouldbe awarded to SunAirwith service to lAD to commence as soon as possible. Accordingto their latest e-mail, theyhave fulfilled the obligations wehad a concern with and we lookforward to working with them to get the new serviceestablished at HGR. Ifyou have any questions orneedfurther clarification, feel free to contactme, Thanks verymuch for all your efforts and support ofthe EAS program and HagerstownRegional Airport! Bestregards, Phil

Phil Ridenour, C.M. Airport Director Hagerstown Regional Airport 18434 Showalter Rd Hagerstown, MD 21742 240-313-2777 Cell- 301-573-1360 www.flyhagerstown.com Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success. 

### cften"'J.<fotd



### From: David Hackett [mailto:davidfhackett@hotmail.com] 

### Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 12:59 PM 

### To: Ridenour, Phil; Larsen, Greg 

### Cc: Tom Cooper 

### Subject: DOT CommentsPhilI spoke to Greg a couple ofdays ago and mentioned that clarifying comments should be sentto DOT about the Sun Air bid. I do think we have all the bases covered, particularly now thatthe IAD gate access has been resolved (we are not going to use United and thus will have more schedule flexibility). I think itwould be preferable ifyou sent a follow-up letter, but ifSun Air needs to do it Mr Cooper will send something in. 1To recap: 

### 1. As you saw, we now have the show cause order for scheduled authority, as anticipated. 2. The interline agreements are set (we will have all the majors except for Southwest and JetBiue). 3. The aircraft have already been purchased and are on the ramp in FLL ready to go (one plane will be reallocated from its current service to give us three). 4. IAD facilities have been obtained. 5. We will wantto work with you on marketing to make sure the community knows better service is available. We will want to take direction from you on whatto do and where. There is no real fixed budget
.....we will want to do what makes sense and is needed, but naturally have to watch the overall expenditure. Let me know ifyou have other questions, and how you would like to follow up with DOT. Thanks. Best regards David Hackett 561-789-1050

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF DICTAPHONE CORPORATION AT MARCH 31,
1997, AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,756
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                       762
<INVENTORY>                                     54,319
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,677
<PP&E>                                          61,692
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 494,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,364
<BONDS>                                        342,294
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,777
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            95
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,695
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   494,661
<SALES>                                         58,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,167
<CGS>                                           29,596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,933)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,099
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,834)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,834)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.90)
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

_________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 4, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 125250(59) Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 125250 

v COA: 242050 

Oakland CC: 01-177534-FC 

NICHOLAS JAMES JACKSON, 

Defendant-Appellee/ant. 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendant-appellant for

extension of the time for filing his reply brief is considered, and it is GRANTED. 

c100405 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 4, 2005 

Clerk
No. 11140.

#### Bell, Jr., *v.*Brinkerhoff.

Decided February 9, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Richland .county.

*Messrs. Cummings, McBride & Wolfe*and *Messrs. Jones & James,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. H. E. Bell,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J.,' Spear, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, David W. Qualls, Chief Financial Officer of Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp. (the Registrant), do hereby certify
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (Section 906) that, based on my knowledge:



(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.



|                         |  |  | 
|------------------------ |  |  | 
|Dated: November 26, 2003 |  |  | 
|                         |  |  | 
|                         |  |  | 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Registrant and will be retained by Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                 CLARITI TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Adopted in accordance with the provisions
                Of Section 228 and 242 of the General Corporation
                         Law of the State of Delaware
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The undersigned, Peter S. Pelullo, President, and Ernest J. Cimadamore,
Secretary of Clariti Telecommunications International, Ltd. ("the
Corporation"), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State
of Delaware, do hereby certify as follows:

     FIRST, that the Board of Directors of the Corporation duly adopted a
resolution proposing and declaring advisable the following amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation.

     RESOLVED, that the Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation be amended
to provide for a new article 4.1, which shall immediately follow Article 4, and
which shall read as follows:

     "4.1  Each share of common stock, par value $.001, of the Corporation that
is issued and outstanding as of 4:30 p.m. EDT on July 3, 2000 (the "Conversion
Time") is hereby converted into and reconstituted as one-fourth (1/4) of a
share of fully paid and non-assessable common stock, par value $.001, effective
as of the Conversion Time.  No fractional shares shall be issued upon such
conversion and reconstitution, and the number of shares of common stock to be
issued shall be rounded up to the nearest whole share. "

     SECOND, that the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the applicable provisions of Sections 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware, as amended, by obtaining written consent in accordance with
Section 228 of said law signed by holders of the outstanding stock of the
Corporation having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be
necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares
entitled to vote thereon were present.

     THIRD, that the capital of the said Corporation shall not be reduced under
or by any reason of said amendment.

     FOURTH, that the effective date and time of this amendment shall be 4:30
p.m. EDT on July 3, 2000.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Clariti Telecommunications International, Ltd. has
caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by Peter S. Pelullo, its
President, and attested by Ernest J. Cimadamore, its Secretary, effective this
3rd day of July 2000.




ATTEST:                          Clariti Telecommunications International, Ltd.
                                 a Delaware Corporation



By: s/Ernest J. Cimadamore             By: s/Peter S. Pelullo
    ----------------------                 ------------------
    Ernest J. Cimadamore, Secretary        Peter S. Pelullo, President
# C_2023071EN.01000401.xml

| 27.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2023 — Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v European Commission, Orlen Lietuva AB

(Case C-42/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Rail freight market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU - Access by third-party undertakings to infrastructure managed by Lithuania’s national railway company - Removal of a section of railway track - Concept of ‘abuse’ - Actual or likely exclusion of a competitor - Exercise by the General Court of its powers of unlimited jurisdiction - Reduction of the fine)

(2023/C 71/04)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB (represented by: K. Apel, W. Deselaers and P. Kirst, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Cleenewerck de Crayencour, A. Dawes, H. Leupold and G. Meessen, acting as Agents), Orlen Lietuva AB (represented by: C. Conte, avvocato, and C. Thomas, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and by Orlen Lietuva AB. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and by Orlen Lietuva AB.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 22.3.2021.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1006 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 119

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1006

                          [Report No. 103-78]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel Arbitrage 
                                  II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                June 29 (legislative day, June 22), 1993

                       Reported without amendment

                                                       Calendar No. 119
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1006

                          [Report No. 103-78]

 To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel Arbitrage 
                                  II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 20 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

 Mr. Hollings introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

                June 29 (legislative day, June 22), 1993

              Reported by Mr. Hollings, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel Arbitrage 
                                  II.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation for the vessel 
Arbitrage II, United States official number 962861.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-18-2018]

On March 9, 2018, PBR, Inc. d/b/a SKAPS Industries (SKAPS) submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 26—Site 29, in Athens, Georgia.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (83 FR 13473, March 29, 2018). On July 9, 2018 the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that further review of the activity is warranted. The production activity described in the notification was not authorized. If the applicant wishes to seek authorization for this activity, it will need to submit an application for production authority, pursuant to Section 400.23.                

Dated: July 9, 2018.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-14928 Filed 7-11-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
|                                   |                                     |                                          |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                   |                                          |
|                              |                                |                                     |
| Date:                  August 10, 2005 |                                     | /s/ *William                  D. Rigsby* |
|                                   |                                          |
|                                   | William D. Rigsby                        |
|                                   | Chief                  Executive Officer |

|                                 |                                                |                                       |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                     |
|                            |                                           |                                  |
| Date:                August 10, 2005 |                                           | /s/ *Russ                Christensen* |
|                                 |                                                     |
|                                 | Russ Christensen                                    |
|                                 | Acting                  Principal Financial Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 50 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 50

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that in light of 
current economic conditions the Federal taxes on gasoline, diesel fuel, 
             and home heating fuel shall not be increased.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1993

 Mr. Solomon submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that in light of 
current economic conditions the Federal taxes on gasoline, diesel fuel, 
             and home heating fuel shall not be increased.

Whereas many sectors of the Nation's economy have yet to recover from the recent 
        economic downturn;
Whereas an energy tax increase would reduce personal consumption, considered to 
        be the engine of the American economy, and an increase in gasoline, 
        diesel fuel, and home heating fuel taxes would seriously hinder economic 
        recovery;
Whereas an increase in the Federal excise tax on gasoline by 10 cents per gallon 
        would further damage the economy in that such tax would increase the 
        Consumer Price Index by 0.3 percent, and place an undue hardship on 
        senior citizens, and low income Americans living on a fixed income.
Whereas Federal, State, and local taxes account for nearly 30 percent of the 
        retail price of gasoline;
Whereas all States already tax gasoline and 20 States in the last 2 years have 
        increased, or have considered increasing, their taxes on gasoline; and
Whereas an energy tax, including the gasoline, diesel fuel, and home heating 
        fuel taxes, are regressive in that less affluent Americans must spend a 
        greater proportion of their income to pay those taxes than do more 
        affluent Americans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
in light of the current economic conditions the Federal taxes on 
gasoline, diesel fuel, and home heating fuel shall not be increased.

                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofFischer Imaging Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the periodending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Kirwan, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 1, 2006 | /s/ DAVID KIRWAN                      |   |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | David Kirwan*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
#### Gerald SWINDLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 66-948.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 12, 1967.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Marvin J. Emory, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., BARKDULL, J., and LOPEZ, AQUILI-NO, Jr., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal reversal is sought of orders of the trial court summarily denying two petitions for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The appellant was charged with separate crimes of larceny of an automobile in two informations. When arraigned he pleaded not guilty. Trial upon one of the informations resulted in his conviction and a sentence to confinement in the state penitentiary for five years. Thereafter he changed his plea to guilty to the other charge, was adjudged guilty and was sentenced to a like period of confinement, to be served concurrently. While so confined appellant filed motions in each of the cases under Rule 1. We have considered appellant’s contentions in the light of the record and briefs and find no reversible error. In the proceedings and trial in the court below the defendant was represented by private counsel of his choice. His present challenge of the quality of that representation is not a basis for relief under Rule 1. Williams v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 167 So.2d 795; Messer v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 169 So.2d 378. As to the case which was tried, the contentions in the motion relating to matters occurring at trial were stated as conclusions not supported by allegations of fact. Dancy v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 208; Murray v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 236. Moreover, such matters were reviewable on appeal. Austin v. State, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 730, 732; Harper v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 168 So.2d 325, 326; Brooks v. State, Fla.App.1966, 188 So.2d 883; Brooks v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 194 So.2d 303, 304. The Rule 1 motion directed to the conviction and sentence in the case in which the defendant *133pleaded guilty failed to present grounds necessitating evidentiary hearing, and the trial judge correctly denied the motion.

Affirmed.