# C_2020247EN.01002001.xml

| 27.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/20

---

Action brought on 8 May 2020 — JS v SRB

(Case T-271/20)

(2020/C 247/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: JS (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of 14 June 2019 decision communicated to the applicant on 17 June 2019 and rejecting his request for assistance of 2 May 2019; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 14 June 2019 decision communicated to the applicant on 17 June 2019 and rejecting his request for assistance of 2 May 2019;

| — | annul in addition, and so far as necessary, the decision communicated to the applicant on 29 January 2020 rejecting his complaint of 14 September 2019; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul in addition, and so far as necessary, the decision communicated to the applicant on 29 January 2020 rejecting his complaint of 14 September 2019;

| — | order compensation of the non-material prejudice suffered by the applicant which can be evaluated, ex aequo et bono, at EUR 20 000; |
| --- | --- |

—

order compensation of the non-material prejudice suffered by the applicant which can be evaluated, ex aequo et bono, at EUR 20 000;

| — | order furthermore compensation of his quantified and evidenced material prejudice evaluated at EUR 77 408; |
| --- | --- |

—

order furthermore compensation of his quantified and evidenced material prejudice evaluated at EUR 77 408;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a breach of Article 12a(3) of the Staff Regulations and of Article 2.1 of the SRB policy adopted by decision of the plenary session of the SRB of 29 November 2017. (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a breach of Article 12a(3) of the Staff Regulations and of Article 2.1 of the SRB policy adopted by decision of the plenary session of the SRB of 29 November 2017. (1)

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a breach of Article 24 of the Staff Regulations and of Article 7.3 of the said SRB policy. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a breach of Article 24 of the Staff Regulations and of Article 7.3 of the said SRB policy.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty of care.
  With regard to the request for compensation, the applicant relies on the fault committed by the defendant, the damage he suffered and the link between the fault and the damage. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty of care.

With regard to the request for compensation, the applicant relies on the fault committed by the defendant, the damage he suffered and the link between the fault and the damage.

---

(1)  Policy on protecting the dignity of the person and preventing psychological harassment and sexual harassment.

---