alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-  Office of the General Counsel (OGC) 
-  About OGC 
-  Key Personnel      -  Immediate Office of the General Counsel 
  -  Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Division 
  -  Children, Family and Aging Division 
  -  Civil Rights Division 
  -  Ethics Division 
  -  Food and Drug Division 
  -  General Law Division 
  -  Legislative Division 
  -  National Complex Litigation and Investigations Division 
  -  Public Health Division 
  -  Regional Offices 
-  Offices      -  Division Offices 
  -  Regional Offices 
-  Careers      -  Career Information Session 
  -  Open Career Opportunities 
  -  Practice Areas 
  -  Benefits and Programs 
  -  Where to Apply 
-  Contact OGC 

                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   
                      -   

# HHS Advisory Opinions

The Office of the General Counsel (“OGC”), at the sole discretion of the General Counsel, may issue Advisory Opinions either (i) in response to requests by the public soliciting the views of the General Counsel on significant legal issues or (ii) *sua sponte* to clarify the Department’s legal position on a critical issue.  The OGC Advisory Opinions represent the then current views of the General Counsel and are subject to modification as warranted.  The Advisory Opinions do not create binding legal norms, are not meant to bind the public in any way, do not have the force and effect of law, and are not final agency action.

## Current Advisory Opinions

                          - Advisory Opinion 21-02
                          - Advisory Opinion 21-01
                          - Advisory Opinion 20-06  WITHDRAWN *
                          - Advisory Opinion 20-05
                          - Advisory Opinion 20-04
                          - Advisory Opinion 20-03
                          - Advisory Opinion 20-02
                          - Advisory Opinion 20-01

*People using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in these files. For assistance, contact the HHS Office of the General Counsel at (202) 690-7998 or by emailing Barbara.McGarey@hhs.gov.

Content last reviewed June 24, 2021
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

217 CA 11-01367 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL PANAGGIO, DECEASED, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT,

AND ORDER

GRANDE’ VIE, LLC, GRANDE’ VIE REALTY, LLC, ANTHONY J. MARASCO AND ANTHONY M. DIMARZO, RESPONDENTS-PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

GATES & ADAMS, P.C., ROCHESTER (ANTHONY J. ADAMS, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS.
PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP, BUFFALO (ALAN J. BOZER OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Ann Marie Taddeo, J.), entered April 13, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75. The judgment confirmed in part the award of the arbitrator.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: March 23, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
# Official Journal C 516/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 516 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6421 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 516

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6421 December 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 516/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products on 20 December 2021
  (Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 516/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products on 20 December 2021
  (Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Press WIGGINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-564.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 29, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, and Department of Legal Affairs, as State agencies, Appellants, v. Arthur GRIGGERS, surviving spouse, and Frances Chilton, heir of the Estate of Margie E. Griggers, Deceased, Appellees.

No. R-103.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 30, 1972.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Paul W. Lambert, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.

Allen W. Lindsay, of Lindsay & Lindsay, Milton, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Gladstone v. Kling (Fla.App.1966) 182 So.2d 471; Old Equity Life Insurance Company v. Levenson (Fla.App.1965) 177 So.2d 50.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C §1350)



I, Lori A. Jones, of Analytical Surveys, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003 (the
Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Analytical Surveys, Inc.



|Dated: December 23, 2003
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ Lori A. Jones       
|Lori A. Jones           
|Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Sierra Health Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony M. Marlon, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
**** EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Whitemark Homes, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:  July
      14,
      2008




/s/
                Douglas Kanter
              Chief
                Executive Officer and
              Acting
                Principal Financial Officer






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Whitemark Homes, Inc. and will be retained
      by Whitemark Homes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
#### GUARDIAN MORTGAGE INVESTORS and Charter Advisory Company, Appellants, v. URBAN MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., a Georgia Corporation, Appellee.

No. GG-186.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 18, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 14, 1977.

James H. Post of Smith, Hulsey, Schwalbe & Nichols, Jacksonville, for appellants.

Dana G. Bradford, II, and Alan Chipper-field of Mahoney, Hadlow & Adams, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Having deliberated the briefs and arguments of counsel, we reconsider our previous order denying motion to dismiss the interlocutory appeal and determine we are without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.

*1120THE INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

McCORD, C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned
officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief,
that:




(1) The
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2008 (the "Form
10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all materials
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      July 1, 2008/s/LarryF.VanceLarry F. VanceChief
      Executive Officer




This
certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
#### PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. L. P. EVANS MOTORS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 67-828.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 29, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Charles DURHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-436.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 19, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Brevard County; Joe A. Cowart, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### PROTECTOR SECURITY CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. Harry E. BELLIN, Appellee.

No. 72-1208.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 14, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Richard H. Cooper, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 2036

PHILLIP MICHAEL PRIDGEN, SR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JURGEN LEIJEKKEN, CEO Hireright; JANET MILLER, Manager, Hireright; WILL WAINRIGHT, Escalation Specialist , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Catherine C. Blake , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv - 01323

- CCB )

Submitted : November 29, 2018 Decided: December 3, 2018

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Phillip Michael Pridgen, Sr. , Appellant Pro Se. Meredith Lynn Schramm

- Strosser , LITTLER MENDELSON PC , Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Phillip Michael Pridgen, Sr. , appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civ il action for lack of personal jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). Because it is possible that Pridgen could cure the defects in his complaint through amendment, the district court’s order he seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral or der. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y , 807 F.3d 619, 623

- 25, 628

- 30 (4th Cir. 2015) ; Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066

- 67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Pridgen to file an amended complaint. We deny Pridgen’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument beca use the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
[No. 302-3.

Division Three.

January 4, 1972.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Guy Myron Rutherford, *Appellant.*
#### Allen L. FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-1076.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 10, 1971.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, Carl V. M. Coffin, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s original direct appeal from a judgment and sentence imposed upon conviction of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and petit larceny was frustrated by an untimely filed notice of appeal by court appointed counsel.

We grant petitioner a belated review of the judgment and sentence equivalent to a direct appeal by means of this habeas corpus proceeding. Henninger v. State, Fla.1970, 230 So.2d 149.

We have heard and considered oral argument of counsel for the respective parties, examined the briefs and record, and conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is affirmed and habeas corpus denied.

Habeas corpus denied.

REED, C. J., CROSS, J., and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge, concur.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the use of our report dated November 19, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Analytical Surveys, Inc.and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of and for the year ended September 30, 2004, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Analytical Surveys, Inc. as of September 30, 2004. 

 

Our report contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has sufferedsignificant operating losses in 2004 and prior years and does not currently have external financing in place to fund working capital requirements, which raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Theconsolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. 

 

/s/ PANNELL KERR FORSTER OF TEXAS, P.C. 

 

Houston, Texas 

December 10, 2004
#### Jerry WESLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-541.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 8, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 65

To authorize and direct the Committee on Appropriations to create a new

Subcommittee on Veterans’ Affairs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1993

Mr. SOLOMON (for himself and Mr. STUMP) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

To authorize and direct the Committee on Appropriations

to create a new Subcommittee on Veterans’ Affairs.

1 Resolved, That the Committee on Appropriations is

2 hereby authorized and directed to establish a new Sub3 committee on Veterans’ Affairs with exclusive subcommit4 tee jurisdiction over the Department of Veterans Affairs

5 and its programs, and the name of the existing sub6 committee having such jurisdiction shall be redesignated

7 accordingly.

Æ
#### Thomas BOWMAN and Mary Bowman, Appellants, v. EMPLOYERS MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, Appellee.

No. 71-88.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 25, 1971.

Jim C. Jones, P.A., Tampa, for appellants.

Vernon W. Evans, Jr., of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings & Evans, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Allen v. Employers Service Corporation, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 454.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.

MANN, J., dissents for reasons expressed in the cited case.
Exhibit 31.2

I, Richard Connelly, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CT Holdings, Inc., a
Delaware corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: April 13, 2005

/s/ RICHARD CONNELLY
--------------------
Richard Connelly, Chief Financial Officer
Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 216 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 216

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          July 1, 1993.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2118) making 
supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and 
for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered 
as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2022418EN.01003101.xml

| 31.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — Segimerus v EUIPO — Karsten Manufacturing (MONSOON)

(Case T-627/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark MONSOON - Absolute ground for invalidity - Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 34 of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2022/C 418/41)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Segimerus Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: G. Donath, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Karsten Manufacturing Corp. (Phoenix, Arizona, United States) (represented by: M. Körner, lawyer)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 July 2021 (Case R 1125/2020-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Segimerus Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Karsten Manufacturing Corp. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Segimerus Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Karsten Manufacturing Corp.

---

(1)  OJ C 471, 22.11.2021.

---
#### KESTER SOLDER COMPANY, Appellant, v. BERRY SOLDER CO., Inc., The American Metal Company, Ltd., and Arthur S. Berry, Appellees.

No. 260.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 1, 1937.

Duell & Kane, of New York City (Benjamin H. Sherman, Alexander C. Mabee, and Charles W. Hills, Jr., all of Chicago, 111., of counsel), for appellant.

Ward, Crosby & Neal, of New York City (S. Mortimer Ward, Jr., and James B. L. Orme, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree (14 F.Supp. 863) affirmed on opinion below.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

February 15, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00434

- CV

Roger WIATREK

, Appellant

v.

Laura WIATREK

, Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas Trial Court No. 14

- 12

- 0756

- CVW The Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’ s Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Response Brief is GRANTED. The Appellee ’ s brief is due on March 19, 2018. No further extensions of time will be granted abse n t extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 15th day of February, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court