alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023083EN.01002002.xml

| 6.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 January 2023 — YAplus DBA Yoga Alliance v EUIPO — Vidyanand (YOGA ALLIANCE INDIA INTERNATIONAL)

(Case T-443/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark YOGA ALLIANCE INDIA INTERNATIONAL - Earlier EU figurative mark yoga ALLIANCE - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2023/C 83/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: YAplus DBA Yoga Alliance (Arlington, Virginia, United States), (represented by: A. Thünken, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Swami Vidyanand (Villupuram, India) (represented by: L. Saglietti and E. Bianco, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 May 2021 (Case R 1062/2020-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders YAplus DBA Yoga Alliance to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders YAplus DBA Yoga Alliance to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 368, 13.9.2021.

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Masakazu Kurushima, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 28, 2005
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Whitemark Homes, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:November
      18, 2005


*/s/ William
              D. Rigsby*William
                D. Rigsby
              Chief Executive
                Officer


Date:
      November 18,
      2005


*/s/ Russ
              Christensen*Russ
                Christensen
              Acting Principal Financial
                Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Whitemark Homes, Inc. and will be retained
      by Whitemark Homes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Fixed Income Market Structure Advisory Committee (“FIMSAC”) will hold a public meeting on Monday, July 16, 2018 at 9:30 a.m.

# PLACE:

The meeting will be held in Multi-Purpose Room LL-006 at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

                        The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and will be open to the public. Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Doors will open at 9:00 a.m. Visitors will be subject to security checks. The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        On June 20, 2018, the Commission published notice of the Committee meeting (Release No. 34-83475), indicating that the meeting is open to the public and inviting the public to submit written comments to the Committee. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting.                              ( print page 32162)    

The agenda for the meeting will include updates and presentations from the FIMSAC subcommittees.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information, please contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: July 9, 2018.

Brent J. Fields,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-14960 Filed 7-9-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
# C_2022002EN.01002401.xml

| 3.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 15 October 2021 — NN v Regione Lombardia

(Case C-636/21)

(2022/C 2/29)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant: NN

Defendant and respondent: Regione Lombardia

Question referred

Does Article 220 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1323 (2) of 2 August 2019 preclude national legislation (such as the Ministerial Decree of 15 January 2020 enacted by the Italian Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry Policies) which is interpreted and applied so as to limit access to compensation for damage caused by avian influenza only to undertakings that have not ceased operating on the date of submission of the application?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 671).

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1323 of 2 August 2019 on exceptional market support measures for the eggs and poultrymeat sectors in Italy (OJ 2019 L 206, p. 12).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000751255
<NAME> DYCO OIL AND GAS PROGRAM 1985-1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          58,496
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,222
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,718
<PP&E>                                      20,980,051
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,776,281
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 329,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     290,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   329,229
<SALES>                                        414,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               416,689
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  327,865
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 88,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             88,824
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    88,824
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    21.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000529

26-JUL-2018

07:54 AM
SCWC-16-0000355 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

DEBBIE S. QUEL, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant/Appellant,

vs. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF HAWAI # I,

Respondent/Respondent-Appellee/Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-16-0000355; CIVIL NO. 15-1-1308) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant/Appellant Debbie S. Quel’s application for writ of certiorari filed on July 6, 2018, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, August 27, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000355 27-AUG-2018 03:55 PM
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT KARI FAMBRO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1855 ) DEBORAH FAMBRO and JOHN ) DICKSON, ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed February 22, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; James Pierce, Judge. Lawrence P. Cartelli of Lawrence P. Cartelli, P.A., Tavares, for Appellant. Jane H. Grossman, St. Petersburg, for Appellee Deborah Fambro. No appearance for remaining Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, SALARIO, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
# C_2022398EN.01001101.xml

| 17.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/11

---

Appeal brought on 19 December 2021 by Ioana-Felicia Rosca against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 20 October 2021 in Case T-434/19, Rosca v Commission

(Case C-802/21 P)

(2022/C 398/12)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Ioana-Felicia Rosca (represented by: L.-O. Tufler, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

By order of 07/09/2022, the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) held that the appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded and that Ms Ioana-Felicia Rosca should bear her own costs.

---
[No. 619-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

June 14, 1971.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael L. Berger, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 53347, Robert M. Elston, J., entered June 5, 1970. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
# C_2021338EN.01001202.xml

| 23.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 4 June 2021 — Criminal proceedings against HYA and Others

(Case C-348/21)

(2021/C 338/14)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Parties to the main proceedings

HYA and Others

Question referred

Is a national law which provides that the right of an accused person to be present in proceedings is safeguarded and the public prosecutor’s office properly discharges its obligation to prove the guilt of the accused person compatible with Articles 8(1) and 6(1) of Directive 2016/343, (1) read in conjunction with recitals 33 and 34 thereof, and the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter if the testimony given at the pre-trial stage of the proceedings by witnesses who cannot be examined for objective reasons is introduced at the trial stage of the criminal proceedings, whereby those witnesses were examined solely by the prosecution and without the participation of the defence, but before a judge, and the prosecution could have provided the defence with the opportunity to participate in that examination at the pre-trial stage, but did not do so?

---

(1)  Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings (OJ 2016 L 65, p. 1).

---
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of The Gillette Company (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30,  2002 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, James M. Kilts,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ James M. Kilts

James M. Kilts
Chief Executive Officer
August 5, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 135 (Friday, July 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 32681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[18XL1109AF LLUTG02000 L13100000.DO0000]


Notice of Termination of the San Rafael Swell Master Leasing 
Plan, Utah

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of termination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The preparation of an Environmental Assessment associated with 
the San Rafael Swell Master Leasing Plan Amendment is no longer 
required, and the process is hereby terminated. Pursuant to Section 
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as 
implemented by the Council on Environmental Quality regulations, the 
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announced its intent to prepare an EA. 
The Notice of Intent (NOI) was published in the Federal Register on May 
18, 2016. The Plan Amendment would have considered modifying oil and 
gas leasing decisions on approximately 525,000 acres in portion of the 
Price and Richfield Field Offices in Emery and Wayne Counties, Utah.

DATES: Termination of the planning process for Rafael Swell Master 
Leasing Plan Amendment takes effect immediately.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Conrad, Price Field Manager, 125 
South 600 West, Price, Utah 84501, telephone (435) 636-3600, email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f0c0c00011d0e0b2f0d030241080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f093939f9e829194b0929c9dde979f86">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the 
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
to contact the above individual during normal business hours. FRS is 
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question 
with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal 
business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Since the publication of the NOI, the BLM 
issued Washington Office Instruction Memo 2018-034, which terminates 
the Master Leasing Process.

    Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10.

Edwin L. Roberson,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 2018-15016 Filed 7-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Thomas Santmyer, Appellant, v City of Syracuse, Respondent.

[654 NYS2d 547]

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in dismissing the complaint on the ground that General Municipal Law § 207-c bars a civil action by a police officer against his employer for an intentional tort. "Section 207-c benefits are applied for and determined in a manner identical to Workers’ Compensation benefits” *(O'Dette v Parton,*190 AD2d 1074, 1075). "Intentional injuries are not covered by the Workers’ Compensation Law, and an employee may bring a tort action for such wrongs against the offending employer” *(Burlew v American Mut. Ins. Co.,*63 NY2d 412, 417; *see also, Elson v Consolidated Edison Co.,*226 AD2d 288; *Ferguson v Davis Auto World,*207 AD2d 991; *Ralph v Oliver,*186 AD2d 977). We therefore conclude that injuries intentionally inflicted upon a police officer by the employer are not covered by General Municipal Law § 207-c and that the officer may bring an action to recover for such injuries. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Nicholson, J.—Dismiss Complaint.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.
#### Eugene MONTGOMERY et ux. v. Donald PARRISH.

No. 47182.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 18, 1973.

Rehearing Denied June 29, 1973.

J. A. White, Durant, for appellants.

J. R. Gilfoy, Lexington, for appellee.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and INZER, ROBERTSON, WALKER and BROOM, JJ-

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-11275

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ERICK ALEJANDRO LOZANO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:18-CR-14-1

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Erick Alejandro 

Lozano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lozano has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 2, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-11275 Document: 00514941139 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/02/2019
No. 18-11275

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-11275 Document: 00514941139 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/02/2019