alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Application Under the Equal Access )

to Justice Act of

-- ) ) ADT Construction Group, Inc. by )

Timothy S. Cory, Chapter 7 Trustee ) ) Under Contract No. DACA09-03-C-0009 ) APPEARANCES FORTHEAPPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 55307

John W. Ralls, Esq. W. Samuel Niece, Esq.

Ralls, Gruber & Niece LLP San Mateo, CA Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney John F. Bazan, Esq. Gilbert H. Chong, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. Army Engineer District, Los Angeles DISMISSAL BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE SHACKLEFORD The parties have resolved the captioned application under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Accordingly, the application is dismissed withprejudice. Dated: 8 February 2016

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContractAppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals on an application for fees and other expenses incurred in connection with ASBCA No. 55307, Appeal ofADT Construction Group, Inc. by Timothy S. Cory, Chapter 7 Trustee, rendered in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 

### § 504. Dated:

2 JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02482

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 02482\02482_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02482\02482_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 02482\02482_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02482\02482_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02482\02482_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02482\02482_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02482\02482_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

02482\Certification Statement Plant ID 02482.pdf Plant certification statement

02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Daniel Map 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Daniel Map 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Daniel NPDES WB-1 Flow Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Daniel NPDES WB-2 Flow Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Daniel NPDES WB-3 Flow Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Plant Daniel ICR Section D Drawings D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Plant Daniel ICR Section D Drawings D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Plant Daniel ICR Section D Drawings D-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02482\Supplemental Documents\02482_Plant Daniel ICR Section D Drawings D-4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,624
<SECURITIES>                                    01,567
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                       863
<INVENTORY>                                     39,401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         454,698
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 504,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        222,825
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   504,824
<SALES>                                        259,845
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               322,506
<CGS>                                          152,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  207,293
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 90,392
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             90,392
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    90,392
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.85


</TABLE>
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 75

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses

of investigations and studies by the Committee on Small Business in

the first session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. LAFALCE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House

for expenses of investigations and studies by the Committee on Small Business in the first session of the One

Hundred Third Congress.

1 Resolved, That for expenses of investigations and

2 studies by the Committee on Small Business (hereinafter

3 in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), there

4 shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House not

5 more than $1,090,000.

6 SEC. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made

7 on vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the
2

HRES 75 IH

1 Chairman of the Committee, and approved by the Commit2 tee on House Administration.

3 SEC. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolu4 tion for investigations and studies carried out during the

5 period beginning at noon on January 3, 1993, and ending

6 immediately before noon on January 3, 1994.

7 SEC. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution

8 shall be expended in accordance with regulations pre9 scribed by the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
Dear FAA Program Analyst,

I would like to close this docket number FAA-2015-1903 due to the fact it is a duplicate

petition request. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at the number below.

John Pope

Lewis Communications

o: 205-980-0774

c: 205-721-0657
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 77

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses

of investigations and studies by the Committee on Natural Resources

in the first session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. MILLER of California submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House

for expenses of investigations and studies by the Committee on Natural Resources in the first session of the

One Hundred Third Congress.

1 Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and

2 studies by the Committee on Natural Resources (herein3 after in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’),

4 including expenses for—

5 (1) procurement of consultant services under

6 section 202(i) of the Legislative Reorganization Act

7 of 1946; and
2

HRES 77 IH

1 (2) provision of assistance for members of pro2 fessional staff in obtaining specialized training under

3 section 202(j) of such Act;

4 there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House

5 not more than $2,268,318.

6 (b) Not more than $2,500 of the amount specified

7 in subsection (a) may be used for consultant services re8 ferred to in paragraph (1) of such subsection and not more

9 than $4,378 of such amount may be used for specialized

10 training referred to in paragraph (2) of such subsection.

11 SEC. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made

12 on vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

13 Chairman of the Committee, and approved by the Commit14 tee on House Administration.

15 SEC. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolu16 tion for investigations and studies carried out during the

17 period beginning at noon on January 3, 1993, and ending

18 immediately before noon on January 3, 1994.

19 SEC. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution

20 shall be expended in accordance with regulations pre21 scribed by the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Fiscal Years Ended
                                        ---------------------------
                                          1997      1996      1995
                                        -------    ------    ------
<S>                                       <C>       <C>       <C>
Weighted average common shares     
 outstanding during the period            5,981     5,883     4,385

Common share equivalents                      0       257       385
                                        -------    ------    ------   
Total                                     5,981     6,140     4,770
                                        =======    ======    ======

Net Income                              ($4,688)   $2,743    $9,753

Interest on convertible debentures           --        --       $35
                                        -------    ------    ------
Adjusted net income                     ($4,688)   $2,743    $9,788
                                        =======    ======    ======

Earnings per share                      ($0.78)    $0.45     $2.05
                                        =======    ======    ======
</TABLE>
# C_2022037EN.01002202.xml

| 24.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/22

---

Appeal brought on 25 November 2021 by Gerardo Galeote (T-243/20) against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 15 September 2021 in Joined Cases T-240/20 to T-245/20, Arnaoutakis and Others v Parliament

(Case C-715/21 P)

(2022/C 37/30)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Gerardo Galeote (represented by: J. M. Martínez Gimeno, abogado, D. Sarmiento Ramírez-Escudero, abogado, E. Arnaldos Orts, abogado, and F. Doumont, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal in its entirety;

| — | rule on the dispute and annul the Parliament’s decision in so far as it rejects the appellant’s application to be granted a voluntary additional pension on the ground that he has not reached the required age of 65; |
| --- | --- |

—

rule on the dispute and annul the Parliament’s decision in so far as it rejects the appellant’s application to be granted a voluntary additional pension on the ground that he has not reached the required age of 65;

| — | order the Parliament to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and the costs of the proceedings before the General Court in Case T-243/20. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Parliament to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and the costs of the proceedings before the General Court in Case T-243/20.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The grounds of appeal allege: (i) the Bureau’s lack of competence to take the decision of the Bureau of 2018, inter alia in so far as it lays down substantive conditions for rights conferring prospective entitlement before the entry into force of the Staff Regulations; (ii) infringement of the first sentence of Article 27(2) of the Staff Regulations by reason of non-observance of rights conferring prospective entitlement prior to the entry into force of the Staff Regulations; (iii) infringement of the principle of equality and non-discrimination and of the principle of proportionality; and (iv) infringement of the principle of legal certainty (lack of transitional measures) and the principle of legitimate expectations.

---
U.S. General Services Administration

When certain items are no longer required by the federal government, 

the items are declared surplus by GSA and made available for transfer 

to State Agencies for Surplus Property (SASPs). In accordance with 

the law, SASPs have been established by each state to distribute 

Federal Surplus Property to eligible state and local governments and 

nonprofit recipients called donees. Competing SASP requests for 

surplus are allocated by GSA based upon a set of predetermined 

criteria. The SASPs receive applications and determine the 

eligibility status of the donees based on eligibility requirements 

established by congressional statutes and implementing regulations 

developed by GSA. SASPs also provide procedures for donees to 

follow in acquiring federal surplus, and enforce the conditions and 

use restrictions placed on the property. Most SASPs operate on a selfsustaining basis and may require recipients to pay a service charge to 

cover handling, transportation and administrative expenses.

State and local governments may also receive donations of surplus 

property certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as 

desirable or necessary for public airport use. FAA establishes 

the eligibility requirements for public airports and makes eligibility 

determinations. Requests for surplus property for public airport use, 

like requests from SASPs for use by donees, must be approved by 

GSA. Surplus personal property includes all types and categories of 

property, with the exception of land or other real property, certain 

naval vessels, and records of the federal government. Examples 

of available property include: 

For more information, visit:

www.gsa.gov/propertydonations

The federal government purchases literally millions 

of products–supplies, equipment, and vehicles– 

every year to assist government agencies in doing 

their jobs. Given the sheer bulk of the purchasing, a 

large surplus is inevitable. This surplus is managed 

by GSA through the Federal Surplus Personal 

Property Donation Program.

Federal Surplus Personal Property 

Donation Program

•	Hand and machine tools

•	Officemachines andsupplies

•	Furniture

•	Appliances

•	Medical supplies

•	Hardware

•	Clothing

•	Motor vehicles

•	Boats

•	Airplanes

•	Construction equipment

•	Textiles

•	Communications equipment

•	Electronic equipment
# C_2022318EN.01003502.xml

| 22.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2022 — bet-at-home.com Entertainment v EUIPO (bet-at-home)

(Case T-640/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for registration of the EU figurative mark bet-at-home - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2022/C 318/48)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: bet-at-home.com Entertainment GmbH (Linz, Austria) (represented by: R. Paulitsch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the reversal of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 5 August 2021 (Case R 2143/2020-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders bet-at-home.com Entertainment GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders bet-at-home.com Entertainment GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 471, 22.11.2021.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KAREEM FARRELL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-2335

[December 28, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Gary L. Sweet, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 562010CF2086A.

Kareem Farrell, Wewahitchka, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Jackie Devon COOK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-679.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 16, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Carlton E. GREGG, W. E. Cobb and Marion A. Cobb, his wife, W. J. Cody and Charles M. Johnston, Appellants, v. Frank G. DOMBROE, Appellee.

No. 67-501.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 3, 1968.

Appeal dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

**CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY**

**Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**

(All dollar amounts in thousands)

|                                        |          | **Year Ended December 31,** |     |
|---------------------------------------------|---------------|-----------------------------|----------|
|                                        |          |                             |     |
|                                        |          |                        | **2002** |   |   | **2001** |   |   | **2000** |   |   | **1999** |   |   | **1998** |   |
|                                        |          |                             |          |   |  |  |   |  |  |   |  |  |   |  |  |   |
| Income (loss) before income taxes           |          |                        | 58,139   |   |   | (7,317 | ) |   | 56,138 |   |   | 77,027 |   |   | 26,816 |   |
| Fixed charges                               |          |                        | 15,418   |   |   | 17,147 |   |   | 19,837 |   |   | 17,861 |   |   | 19,645 |   |
| Amortization of capitalized interest        |          |                        | 553      |   |   | 552 |   |   | 534 |   |   | 686 |   |   | 609 |   |
| Capitalized interest                        |          |                        | 319      |   |   | 118 |   |   | (300 | ) |   | (588 | ) |   | (1,940 | ) |
|                                        |          |                             |          |   |  |  |   |  |  |   |  |  |   |  |  |   |
| Earnings                                    |          |                        | 74,429   |   |   | 10,500 |   |   | 76,209 |   |   | 94,986 |   |   | 45,130 |   |
|                                        |          |                             |          |   |  |  |   |  |  |   |  |  |   |  |  |   |
| Imputed interest relating to rental expense |          |                        | 464      |   |   | 468 |   |   | 460 |   |   | 470 |   |   | 169 |   |
| Interest expense                            |          |                        | 14,954   |   |   | 16,679 |   |   | 19,377 |   |   | 17,391 |   |   | 19,476 |   |
|                                        |          |                             |          |   |  |  |   |  |  |   |  |  |   |  |  |   |
|                                        | Fixed charges |                        |     | 15,418 |   |   | 17,147 |   |   | 19,837 |   |   | 17,861 |   |   | 19,645 |   |
|                                        |          |                             |          |   |  |  |   |  |  |   |  |  |   |  |  |   |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges          |          |                        | 4.8      | x |   | 0.6 | x |   | 3.8 | x |   | 5.3 | x |   | 2.3 | x |
|                                             |               |                             |          |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
 State or JurisdictionName
    
    of IncorporationPicor Corporation
    
    Delaware, USAV*I Chip Corporation
    
    Delaware, USAVLT, Inc.
    
    California, USAVicor GmbH
    
    GermanyVICR Securities Corporation
    
    Massachusetts, USAVicor France SARL
    
    FranceVicor Italy SRL
    
    ItalyVicor Hong
Kong Ltd.
    
    Hong KongVicor U.K. Ltd.
    
    United KingdomVicor B.V.
    
    NetherlandsVicor Japan Company, Ltd.
    
    JapanVicor Development Corporation
    
    Delaware, USAAegis Power
Systems, Inc.
    
    Delaware, USAMission
Power Systems, Inc.
    
    Delaware, USANorthwest
Power Integration, Inc.
    
    Delaware, USAConverpower Corporation
    
    Delaware, USAFreedom
Power Systems, Inc.
    
    Delaware, USA
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 344 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 344

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
  investigations and studies by the Committee on Science, Space, and 
  Technology in the second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1994

Mr. Brown submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
  investigations and studies by the Committee on Science, Space, and 
  Technology in the second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

    Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and studies by 
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology (hereinafter in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including expenses for--
            (1) procurement of consultant services under section 202(i) 
        of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946; and
            (2) provision of assistance for members of professional 
        staff in obtaining specialized training under section 202(j) of 
        such Act;
there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House not more 
than $2,959,438.
    (b) Not more than $25,000 of the amount specified in subsection (a) 
may be used for consultant services referred to in paragraph (1) of 
such subsection and not more than $19,031.78 of such amount may be used 
for specialized training referred to in paragraph (2) of such 
subsection.
    Sec. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers 
authorized by the Committee, signed by the chairman of the Committee, 
and approved by the Committee on House Administration.
    Sec. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolution for 
investigations and studies carried out during the period beginning at 
noon January 3, 1994, and ending immediately before noon on January 3, 
1995.
    Sec. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution shall be 
expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on 
House Administration.

                                 <all>
```
#### William C. FREIMUTH, Appellant, v. Theresa FREIMUTH, Appellee.

No. 70-933.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 7, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.