alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07213

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

07213\07213_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

07213\07213_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07213\07213_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07213\07213_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07213\07213_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07213\07213_PlantID_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07213\Certification Statement Plant ID 07213.PDF Plant certification statement

07213\Supporting Documentation\07213_MAP-1 Garden City Station.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07213\Supporting Documentation\07213_WB-1 Garden City Station.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a Virginia corporation, Mercantile-Safe Deposit and Trust Company, a Maryland corporation, and C. E. Heinmuller, of Baltimore County, Maryland, Petitioners, v. TAMPA PHOSPHATE RAILROAD COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Respondent.

No. 67-322.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Sept. 6, 1967.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 451 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 451

 Requiring that travel awards that accrue by reason of official travel 
 of a Member, officer, or employee of the House of Representatives be 
               used only with respect to official travel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1994

 Ms. English of Arizona (for herself, Mr. Fingerhut, Ms. Shepherd, Mr. 
 Frank of Massachusetts, Ms. Margolies-Mezvinsky, Mr. Coppersmith, Mr. 
 Kolbe, Mr. Kyl, and Mr. Becerra) submitted the following resolution; 
      which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Requiring that travel awards that accrue by reason of official travel 
 of a Member, officer, or employee of the House of Representatives be 
               used only with respect to official travel.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``Official Travel Reform 
Resolution''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF TRAVEL AWARDS.

    Notwithstanding any provision of law or any rule, regulation, or 
other authority, any travel award that accrues by reason of official 
travel of a Member, officer, or employee of the House of 
Representatives may be used only with respect to official travel.

SEC. 3. REGULATIONS.

    The Committee on House Administration of the House of 
Representatives shall have authority to prescribe regulations to carry 
out this resolution.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

    As used in this resolution--
            (1) the term ``travel award'' means any frequent flier 
        mileage, free travel, discounted travel, or other travel 
        benefit, whether awarded by coupon, membership, or otherwise; 
        and
            (2) the term ``official travel'' means, with respect to the 
        House of Representatives, travel performed for the conduct of 
        official business of the House of Representatives.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Whitemark Homes, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

      Date: May 10, 2005

                                       /s/ Kenneth White
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Kenneth White
                                       Chief Executive Officer


      Date: May 10, 2005

                                       /s/ Russ Christensen
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Russ Christensen
                                       Acting Principal Financial Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Whitemark Homes,
Inc. and will be retained by Whitemark Homes, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00886-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.C.G., a Child

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-13767

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 6, 2023

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

On August 21, 2017, the trial court signed an order establishing the parent-child 

relationship and determining conservatorship and visitation. Appellant’s notice of appeal was due 

on September 20, 2017, or a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was due on 

October 5, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3; see generally Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 

615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (“[A] motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant 

acting in good faith files a [notice of appeal] beyond the time allowed by Rule [26.1], but within

the fifteen-day period in which the appellant would be entitled to move to extend the filing deadline 

under Rule [26.3].” (emphasis added)).

On October 2, 2023, after the deadline to file the notice of appeal, Appellant, the child’s 

father, filed a notice of appeal. On October 26, 2023, we advised Appellant that a timely notice 
04-23-00886-CV

- 2 -

of appeal is necessary to invoke this court’s appellate jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. See 

generally Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617. We ordered Appellant to show cause in writing to this 

court by November 6, 2023, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

Appellant responded on November 5, 2023, that this court maintains jurisdiction to 

consider his appeal because it concerns standing, which may be challenged at any time. We agree 

that standing may be challenged at any time. See Tex. Ass’n of Bus. v. Tex. Air Control Bd., 852 

S.W.2d 440, 444 (Tex. 1993). However, an order from the trial court may only be appealed within 

thirty days of its entry under Rule 26.1. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. See generally Verburgt, 959 

S.W.2d at 617. We now dismiss this appeal of the trial court’s August 21, 2017 order for want of 

jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
No. 10559.

#### Silby *v.*Haviland et al.

Decided December 23, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court oí Eluron county.

*Messrs. McKnight & Thomas,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. C. P., L. W. & R. D. Wickham,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 92

Electing Representatives Wheat, McDermott, Norton, Levin, Lewis of Georgia,

and Jefferson to the Committee on the District of Columbia; and Representative Spratt to the Committee on Government Operations to rank

following Representative Towns.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 18, 1993

Mr. HOYER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Electing Representatives Wheat, McDermott, Norton, Levin,

Lewis of Georgia, and Jefferson to the Committee on

the District of Columbia; and Representative Spratt to

the Committee on Government Operations to rank following Representative Towns.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

2 are hereby, elected to the following standing committees:

3 COMMITTEE ON THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: Alan

4 Wheat, Missouri; Jim McDermott, Washington; Eleanor

5 Holmes Norton, District of Columbia; Sander M. Levin,

6 Michigan; John Lewis, Georgia; and William J. Jefferson,

7 Louisiana.
2

HRES 92 ATH

1 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS: John

2 M. Spratt, Jr., South Carolina, to rank following

3 Edolphus Towns, New York.

Æ
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely
in connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Retractable Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned Thomas J. Shaw, Chief Executive Officer, and Douglas W. Cowan, Chief Financial Officer, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.



November 15, 2004



/s/ Thomas J. ShawTHOMAS J. SHAWPRESIDENT, CHAIRMAN, ANDCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/s/ Douglas W.
CowanDOUGLAS W. COWANVICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
#### Joseph R. ANDROSCO v. SOLICITOR OF VOLUSIA COUNTY.

No. 38566.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  252,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,700
<INVENTORY>                                     18,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               266,400
<PP&E>                                       3,638,500
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,247,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,794,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          307,200
<BONDS>                                        765,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       448,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,794,100
<SALES>                                        280,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               280,500
<CGS>                                           83,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 86,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             54,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 418 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 418

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                           May 5, 1994.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. 
Res. 218) setting forth the congressional budget for the United States 
Government for the fiscal years 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999. All points of 
order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read. The conference report shall 
be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on the Budget.
    Sec. 2. Rule XLIX shall not apply with respect to the adoption by the 
Congress of the conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. 
Con. Res. 218) setting forth the congressional budget for the United States 
Government for the fiscal years 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2022158EN.01000301.xml

| 11.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 23 December 2021 — UP v Centre public d’action sociale de Liège

(Case C-825/21)

(2022/C 158/04)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UP

Defendant: Centre public d’action sociale de Liège

Question referred

Do Articles 6 and 8 of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (1) preclude a rule of national law under which the consequence of granting authorisation conferring a right to stay in the context of the examination of an application for leave to remain for the purpose of medical treatment, considered to be admissible in the light of the criteria set out above, is that the third-country national is entitled to stay, even temporarily and irregularly, during the examination of that application and that the return decision previously adopted in an asylum procedure, with which the grant of such authorisation is incompatible, is impliedly withdrawn?

---

(1)  Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98).

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   Page 16 of 16


                               GENESEE CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genesee Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending January 28, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Steven
M. Morse, President (as Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (i)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) The information contained in the Report presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.


                                        /s/ Steven M. Morse
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Steven M. Morse
                                        President (Principal Executive Officer)
                                        March 13, 2006

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Genesee Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending January 28, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Steven
M. Morse, Treasurer (as Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (iii) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (iv) The information contained in the Report presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.


                                        /s/ Steven M. Morse
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Steven M. Morse
                                        Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
                                        March 13, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7445

RONALD WAYNE LEWIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SUHASINI N. SHAH, Medical Doctor, FCI Petersburg,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 11-7450

RONALD WAYNE LEWIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HARLEY LAPPIN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief 

District Judge. (3:10-cv-00568-JRS; 3:10-cv-00130-JRS)

Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 22, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Wayne Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Ronald Wayne Lewis 

appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation 

of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil rights 

actions in which he alleged that he received inadequate medical 

care. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Lewis v. Shah, No. 3:10-cv-00568-JRS (E.D. Va. 

Oct. 18, 2011); Lewis v. Lappin, No. 3:10-cv-00130-JRS (E.D. Va. 

Oct. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Margaret L. McMANUS, Appellant, v. James W. McMANUS, Appellee.

No. 70-353.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 5, 1970.

*474Carlton L. Weidemeyer, of Wightman, Rowe & Weidemeyer, Clearwater, for appellant.

Leslie D. Franklin and James C. Wallace, III, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

LILES, Judge.

Appellant and appellee were divorced in 1969, and the court awarded custody of the three minor children of the parties to the appellee father. The order of the court awarding custody also prevented either party from removing the children from the State of Florida.

Subsequently, the father petitioned the court for modification of the final decree, seeking permission to remove the children to the State of Michigan. The mother contested modification and asked that the decree be modified giving her custody of the children. At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial judge granted appellee’s petition to remove the children to the State of Michigan and this appeal ensued.

We believe the trial court erred in granting the father permission to remove the children to the State of Michigan, thereby rendering visitation of the children by their mother a nullity. The mother has been seeing the children almost daily. This arrangement seems to be in the best interests of the children whose ages are 8, 9 and 10. To remove these children from the State of Florida to the State of Michigan would for all intents and purposes nullify the mother’s opportunity to visit the children and have them visit with her.

The testimony shows that appellant mother has remarried and provides an adequate home and surroundings for the visitation of the children. The uncontradicted testimony of Dr. Rosenblum also shows that the best interest of the children would best be served by remaining where the mother could visit with the children.

For these reasons the order allowing the father to remove the children from the State of Florida is hereby reversed, and the order denying appellant’s motion for a change of custody is affirmed.

Reversed in part and affirmed in part.

PIERCE, J., concurs.

HOBSON, C. J., dissents.

Hobson, Chief Judge

(dissenting).

I feel that the trial court’s order should be affirmed in its entirety.
Ryder Scott Company
Petroleum Consultants

1100 Louisiana                                         Fax (713) 651-0849
Suite 3800  Houston, TX  77002-5218              Telephone (713) 651-9191






                      CONSENT OF PETROLEUM CONSULTING FIRM




      We consent to the  reference to our name included in this Annual Report on
Form  10-K  for  the  year  ended December 31, 2000 for Dyco Oil and Gas Program
1985-1 Limited Partnership.



                                    //s// Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

                                    RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.






Houston, Texas
January 31, 2001