Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2023 ALJ Decisions
                              Samuel Nathan Richmeier, DAB CR6239 (2023)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Samuel Nathan Richmeier, DAB CR6239 (2023)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Samuel Nathan Richmeier,
(OI File No. B-21-41354-9),
Petitioner,

v.

The Inspector General.
Docket No. C-23-74Decision No. CR6239February 21, 2023

        
              
    

      DECISION

Although the record in this case provides few underlying details, it seems that Petitioner Richmeier fabricated case management notes, which his employer used to bill, fraudulently, the Ohio Medicaid program.  Petitioner was charged with one misdemeanor count of possession of criminal tools (the false case management notes), to which he pleaded guilty.  Based on this, the Inspector General (IG) has excluded him for five years from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs, as authorized by section 1128(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (Act).

Petitioner appeals.

For the reasons discussed below, I find that the IG properly excluded Petitioner.  Because the statute mandates a minimum five-year exclusion, the length of his exclusion is, by law, reasonable.

Background

In a letter dated September 30, 2022, the IG notified Petitioner that he was excluded from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs for a period of

Page 2

five years because he had been convicted of a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or a state health care program.  The letter explained that section 1128(a)(1) of the Act authorizes the exclusion.  IG Ex. 1.

Petitioner timely requested review.

The IG submitted a written argument (IG Br.) and four exhibits (IG Exs. 1-4).  Petitioner also submitted a brief (P. Br.).  The IG submitted a Reply (IG Reply).  In the absence of any objections, I admit into evidence IG Exs. 1-4.

The parties agree that an in-person hearing is not necessary.  IG Br. at 3; P. Br. at 3.

Discussion

Petitioner must be excluded from program participation for a minimum of five years because he was convicted of a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under a state health care program.  Act §1128(a)(1).1Under section 1128(a)(1) of the Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services must exclude an individual who has been convicted under federal or state law of a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or a state health care program.  42 C.F.R. § 1001.101(a).

**The conviction**.  In a complaint issued on September 21, 2021, Petitioner was charged with one misdemeanor count of Possessing Criminal Tools, in violation of Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.24(A).  The complaint charged that, on or about March 16, 2020, through April 30, 2020, “as part of a course of criminal conduct,” Petitioner “did . . . possess or have under [his] control any substance, device, instrument, or article, with purpose to use it criminally, to wit:  *false case management notes which [Petitioner] caused to be billed to the Ohio Department of Medicaid* in Franklin, Ohio.”  IG Ex. 3 (emphasis added).

On November 5, 2021, Petitioner pleaded guilty to the charge.  IG Ex. 2.  The court accepted his plea, imposed a fine, and ordered him to pay $247.50 in restitution to the Ohio Department of Medicaid.  IG Ex. 2.

Petitioner’s crime was thus unquestionably related to the delivery of an item or service under a state health care program.  He created case management records for services that

Page 3

he did not provide.  His employer billed the Ohio Medicaid program for the phantom services.  Ohio Medicaid reimbursed the employer, and the employer then paid Petitioner.  *See* IG Ex. 4.  His conviction falls squarely within the statutory and regulatory definition of “conviction,” and his crime was directly related to the delivery of services under a state health care program.  He is therefore subject to exclusion.

**Petitioner’s defenses**.  Petitioner complains that, at the time of his conviction, no one mentioned that he might be subject to an exclusion.  This does not alter the fact of his conviction, which does not require a showing that he was advised of all potential consequences of his guilty plea.  *Janet R. Constantino*, DAB No. 2666 at 10 (2015) (citing *Ioni D. Sisodia*, DAB No. 2224 at 7 (2008)).

Petitioner also suggests that his crime was, in fact, the result of an innocent mistake and involved very little money, which he repaid.  He points out that the events occurred during the beginning of the COVID outbreak, which was a confusing time, causing him to submit electronically incorrect information.  Such a collateral attack on his conviction is precluded by regulation:

When the exclusion is based on the existence of a criminal conviction . . .  by [a] Federal, State, or local court . . .  where the facts were adjudicated and a final decision was made, the basis for the underlying conviction . . . is not reviewable and the individual or entity may not collaterally attack it, either on substantive or procedural grounds in this appeal.

42 C.F.R. § 1001.2007(d); *Yolanda Hamilton, M.D.*, DAB No. 3061 at 9-10 (2022); *Funmilola Mary Taiwo*, DAB No. 2995 at 8 (2020); *Marvin L. Gibbs, Jr., M.D.*, DAB No. 2279 at 8-10 (2009); *Roy Cosby Stark*, DAB No. 1746 (2000).

That his crime involved a relatively small amount of money does not alter the facts that he was convicted and that his crime was related to the delivery of an item or service under the Medicaid program – the two elements that compel an exclusion.

Finally, Petitioner complains about the length of time it has taken for the IG to act.  An administrative law judge has no authority to review the timing of the IG’s determination to impose an exclusion.  An effective date cannot be changed based on how long after his conviction the IG imposes the exclusion.  *Rita Patel*, DAB No. 2884 at 6-7 (2018); *Tanya A. Chuoke, R.N.*, DAB No. 1721 (2000); *Samuel W. Chang, M.D.*, DAB No. 1198 (1990).

An exclusion brought under section 1128(a)(1) must be for a minimum period of five years.  Act § 1128(c)(3)(B); 42 C.F.R. § 1001.102(a).

Page 4

Conclusion

For these reasons, I conclude that the IG properly excluded Petitioner from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and all federal health care programs, and I sustain the five-year exclusion.



Endnotes

1   I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law.
  
          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back