April 20, 2015 

 Exemption No. 11398 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–0145 

Mr. Marco F. Zvanik 

Ventus Wind, LLC 

7202 Greystone Lane 

Frisco, TX 75034 

Dear Mr. Zvanik: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated January 20, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Ventus Wind, LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an exemption. The 

exemption would allow the petitioner to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to 

conduct aerial inspections of its legacy power generation customers and to expand to support 

the growth of new customers in the onshore and offshore regions of the United States. 

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and 

the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 
2 

Airworthiness Certification 

The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the DJI Phantom 2, DJI Phantom 2 Vision+, DJI 

Inspire 1, and DJI Spreading Wings S-1000. 

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products 

and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates. In accordance with the statutory criteria 

provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112−95 in reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in 

consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the 

aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft 

meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA finds that the requested relief from 

14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness 

Certificates, and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is 

not necessary. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection. The FAA has issued grants of 

exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. 

In Grants of Exemption Nos. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 

11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (see

Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. 

FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned 

aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or 

crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in 

addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled 

by this exemption is in the public interest. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of 

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213; 

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 

11213 also apply to the situation you present; and 

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, 

delegated to me by the Administrator, Ventus Wind LLC. is granted an exemption from 

14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 

91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to 
3 

the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data. This 

exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

In this grant of exemption, Ventus Wind, LLC is hereafter referred to as the operator. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Phantom 2, 

DJI Phantom 2 Vision+, DJI Inspire 1, and DJI S-1000 when weighing less than 

55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a 

new petition or a petition to amend this exemption. 

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are 

not permitted. 

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The 

exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine 

compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at 

airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the 

aircraft manufacturer. 

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL. 

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. 

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than 

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate or 

U.S. driver’s license. 

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within 

the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used 

to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS 

capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times; 

electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must 

be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the 

duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties 

required of the VO. 

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its 

operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of 

exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating 
4 

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the 

Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and 

limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, 

the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. 

Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating 

documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the 

operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised 

documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The 

operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension 

or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or 

revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then the 

operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS 

Integration Office (AFS−80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or 

revisions to the operating documents. 

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation 

or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo 

a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. 

Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at 

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such 

a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property. 

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is 

in a condition for safe operation. 

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the 

UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre-flight inspection must account for all 

potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the 

inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is 

prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the 

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. 

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, 

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and 

aircraft components. 

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer 

safety bulletins. 

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, 

commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a 

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a 

state, the District of Colombia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal 
5 

government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate. 

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the 

ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be 

operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC 

qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs 

(training, proficiency, and experience-building) and determining the PIC’s ability to 

safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated 

under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, 

training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During 

training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for 

flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA 

with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119. 

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All 

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights 

under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized. 

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as 

denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not 

denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current 

FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s 

management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption 

holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available 

to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. 

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC. 

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a 

pre-determined location within the private or controlled-access property. 

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies. 

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the 

intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve 

power recommended by the manufacturer if greater. 

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All 

operations shall be conducted in accordance with an ATO-issued COA. The 
6 

exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct 

operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA. 

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification 

(N−Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must 

be as large as practicable. 

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and 

any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the 

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. These 

documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement 

official upon request. 

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and 

activities at all times. 

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless: 

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons 

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure 

that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises 

where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of 

the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety 

of nonparticipating persons; and 

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission 

for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of 

the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not 

present an undue hazard. 

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered 

nonparticipating persons under this exemption. 

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. 

Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be 

obtained for each flight to be conducted. 

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported 

to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be 
7 

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions 

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov. 

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and 

television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply. 

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) 

as documented in this grant of exemption. 

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this 

exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards 

District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming. The 3-day 

notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities 

must include at least the following: 

a. Dates and times for all flights; 

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted 

under this grant of exemption; 

c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on-scene operation of 

the UAS; 

d. Make, model, and serial or N−Number of UAS to be used; 

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming; 

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners 

and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those 

who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request; 

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and 

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, 

town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes 

essential to accomplish the operation. 

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons 

consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the 

exemption holder’s MPTOM. 
8 

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS 

operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, 

parts 45, 47, 61, and 91. 

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John S. Duncan 

Director, Flight Standards Service 

 
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC.

Regulatory Docket No. _______________

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF:

VENTUS WIND LLC,

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (14 CFR) PART 21

SECTIONS; §§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103, 91.109, 91.119, 

91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) 

and (b).

CONCERNING OPERATION OF AN UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM

PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE

FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012

Submitted on January 20, 2015

Ventus Wind LLC.

Marco F. Zvanik (Pro Se.)

7202 Greystone Lane

Frisco, Texas 75034

Tel: (214) 908-9444

Email: mzvanik@ventuswind.com
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 Page

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS ...........................................................................3

SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................4

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER ............................................4

BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................5

BASIS FOR PETITION .................................................................................................10

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER ......................................................10

SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH VENTUS, 

SEEKS EXEMPTION.............................................................11

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF VENTUS SEEKS AND THE 

REASON VENTUS, SEEKS RELIEF & REASONS WHY GRANTING 

VENTUS, REQUEST WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ‘.....12

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION WOULD 

NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY ................................................16

FLIGHT OPERATIONS...................................................................21

CONCLUSION ...............................................................................................................24
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 3

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level

ATC Air Traffic Control

COA Certificate of Authorization

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation

NAS National Airspace System

Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333

SMS Safety Management System

UAV Unmanned Aircraft System

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions

VTOL Vertical Take Off and Landing 
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 4

SUMMARY

Ventus Wind LLC., seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.23(b), 

61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b) (2), 91.103, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) and 

(b), 91.405(a), 1.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b)., as well as the restricted 

category airworthiness certification standards specified in 14 C.F.R. § 21.185, including the 

requirement to have a certificate of airworthiness as contemplated by 14 C.F.R. Part 21. 

This exemption will permit Ventus Wind, LLC. to operate its various Unmanned Aircraft 

Vehicles (“UAV”) at or above wind power generation facilities, onshore oil & gas facilities, 

onshore pipelines and other remote/uninhabited locations, while keeping the documents required 

by the regulations at the ground control station and immediately accessible to the pilot in 

command. Furthermore, the exemption will relieve Ventus, LLC. from the airworthiness 

certificate standards and the requirement to have a certificate of airworthiness issued for its 

UAV. This exemption will also permit any required markings concerning the operational status 

of its UAV to be displayed on the main section of the unmanned aircraft.

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

Ventus, LLC. (Hereinafter referred to as “Ventus”) is a 5 year old wind power plant 

inspection firm with a long and well-recognized history in 3rd party inspections, Operations & 

Maintenance, Expert Witness Services and Root Cause Analysis of failures in the power 

generation and composites industry. Ventus has an extensive history of utilizing multi-rotor 

Vertical Take Off and Landing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, (VTOL) (UAV’s), for the purpose of 

making highly accurate aerial inspections of wind turbine rotor blades and onshore pipelines for 

a range of clients and various similar applications. 

Since 2009, Ventus has been operating a variety of VTOL aircraft for wind power plant 

aerial inspections and will continue to acquire additional UAV’s all under 55 lbs in weight. As 

set forth in this Petition, Ventus seeks to operate its UAV’s for the special purpose of aerial 

inspections of its legacy power generation customers and to expand to support the growth of new 

customers in the onshore and offshore regions of the United States. Ventus plans to do this with 

a continued focus on safety and the highest standards of quality, maintenance and reliability.
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 5

BACKGROUND

Unmanned Aircraft Vehicle: DJI PHANTOM II UAV

Ventus seeks an exemption to operate its existing DJI PHANTOM II UAV, for 

compensation or hire within the national airspace system (“NAS”). 

The DJI PHANTOM II UAV is comprised of a VTOL unmanned aircraft and a 

transportable ground station. The DJI PHANTOM II UAV has a maximum gross weight of

approximately one (1) pound and the following technical and operational specifications:

Weight (Battery & Propellers included)-1030g

Hover Accuracy (Ready to Fly)-Vertical: 0.8m; Horizontal: 2.5m

Max Yaw Angular Velocity-200°/s

Max Tilt Angle-35°

Max Ascent / Descent Speed-Ascent: 6m/s; Descent: 2m/s

Max Flight Speed-15m/s

Diagonal Length-350mm

Power Consumption-5.6W

Flight Time-25mins

Take-off Weight-≤1300g

Operating Temperature--10°C ~ 50°C

Supported Battery-DJI Intelligent Battery 

Type-3S LiPo

Capacity-5200mAh, 11.1V

Charging Environment Range-0°C to 40°C

Discharging Environment Range--20°C to 50°C

Operating Frequency-2.4GHz ISM

Communication Distance (open area)-1000m

Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER)--97dBm

Working Current/Voltage-100 mA@6V

Battery-4 AA Batteries

The DJI PHANTOM II unmanned aircraft is equipped with four (4) propellers driven by 
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 6

Four (4) Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motors.

FIGURE 1: VENTUS’s DJI PHANTOM II with GoPro Hero 3 Camera System

1 Ventus will submit an Aircraft Registration Application for each UAV upon the grant of the 

exemptions sought by this Petition.

Unmanned Aircraft Vehicle: Inspire 1 UAV

Ventus seeks an exemption to operate its existing Inspire 1, UAV, for compensation or 

hire within the national airspace system (“NAS”). 

The Inspire 1 UAV is comprised of a VTOL unmanned aircraft and a transportable 

ground station. The Inspire 1 UAV has a maximum gross weight of approximately six and one 

half (6.5) pounds and the following technical and operational specifications:
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 7

Aircraft Model T600

Weight (Battery Included) 2935 g

Hovering Accuracy (GPS mode) Vertical: 0.5 m

Horizontal: 2.5 m

Max Angular Velocity Pitch: 300°/s

Yaw: 150°/s

Max Tilt Angle 35°

Max Ascent Speed 5 m/s

Max Descent Speed 4 m/s

Max Speed 22 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind)

Max Flight Altitude 4500 m

Max Wind Speed Resistance 10 m/s

Max Flight Time Approximately 18 minutes

Motor Model DJI 3510

Propeller Model DJI 1345

Indoor Hovering Enabled by default

Operating Temperature Range -10° to 40° C

Diagonal Distance 559 to 581 mm

Dimensions 438 x 451 x 301 mm

FIGURE 2: VENTUS’S INSPIRE 1 WITH BUILT IN VIDEO/CAMERA SYSTEM
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 8

2 Ventus will submit an Aircraft Registration Application for each UAV upon the grant of the 

exemptions sought by this Petition.

Unmanned Aircraft Vehicle: S1000 UAV

Ventus seeks an exemption to operate its existing S1000, UAV, for compensation or hire 

within the national airspace system (“NAS”). 

The S1000 UAV is comprised of a VTOL unmanned aircraft and a transportable ground station. 

The S1000 UAV has a maximum gross weight of approximately nine and one half (9.5) pounds 

and the following technical and operational specifications:

Diagonal Wheelbase: 1045mm

Frame Arm Length: 386mm

Frame Arm Weight: 325g (Including Motor, ESC, Propeller )

Center Frame Diameter: 337.5mm

Center Frame Weight: 1330g (with Landing Gear Mounting Base, Servos)

Landing Gear Size: 460mm (Length) ×511mm (Width) ×305mm (Height), 

(Top width: 155 mm)

Motor: Stator Size: 41×14mm

KV: 400rpm/V

Max Power: 500W

Weight: 158g (with Cooling Fan)

Working Current: 40A

Working Voltage: 6S LiPo

Signal Frequency: 30Hz ~ 450Hz

Drive PWM Frequency: 8KHz

Weight: 35g (with Radiators)

Foldable Propeller: (1552/1552R) 

Propeller Size: 15×5.2inch
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 9

Weight: 13g

Takeoff Weight: 6.0Kg ~ 11.0Kg

Total Weight: 4.2Kg

Power Battery: LiPo (6S、10000mAh~20000mAh、15C(Min))

Max Power Consumption: 4000W

Hover Power Consumption: 1500W (@9.5Kg Takeoff Weight)

Hover Time: 15min (@15000mAh & 9.5Kg Takeoff Weight)

Working Environment Temperature: -10 °C ~ +40 °C 

For A2 flight controller:

Basic: Roll 120%, Pitch 120%, Yaw 120%

Attitude: Roll 170%, Pitch 170%, Vertical 120%

For WooKong-M flight controller:

Basic: Roll 180%, Pitch 180%, Yaw 120%

Attitude: Roll 180%, Pitch 180%, Vertical 120%

FIGURE 3: VENTUS’S S1000 WITH ADDED VIDEO/CAMERA SYSTEM
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 10

Proven Operational History of: DJI PHANTOM II, S1000 and Inspire 1 UAV in the NAS

The DJI PHANTOM II, S1000 and Inspire 1 UAV’s are currently operating safely within 

the NAS. Ventus has been operating UAV’s under 55lbs for the past 5 years without any 

recorded incident, accident or failure. 

BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, Ventus Wind, LLC., pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation 

Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 

333, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, hereby petitions the Administrator 

for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 

91.9(b) (2), 91.103, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 1.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b)., as well as the restricted category airworthiness certification 

standards specified in 14 C.F.R. § 21.185, including the requirement to have a certificate of 

airworthiness as contemplated by 14 C.F.R. Part 21. 

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, Ventus provides the following information in support of 

its petition for exemption:

A) Name and Address Of The Petitioner.

The name and address of the Petitioner is:

Ventus Wind, LLC.

Mailing Address: 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034

General Office: 2488 North Pearl Street, Dallas, TX 75201

The point of contact for this Petition and specific contact information is as follows:

Marco F. Zvanik.

Ventus Wind LLC.

Mailing Address: 7202 Greystone Lane, Frisco, Texas 75034

Tel: (214) 908-9444

Email: mzvanik@ventuswind.com
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 11

The Specific Sections of 14 C.F.R. From Which Ventus Seeks Exemption.

1. 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) (1)

Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes the procedural requirements for 

the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR §91.203 (a) (1). Given the size and 

limited operating area associated with the aircraft to be utilized by Ventus, an exemption from 

Part 21 Subpart H meets the requirements of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and 

Section 333 of the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C.§44701 (f)) and Section 333 

of the Reform Act both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an 

airworthiness certificate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability, 

and proximity to airports and populated areas of the particular UAV. In all cases, an analysis of 

these criteria demonstrates that the UAV operated without an airworthiness certificate, in the 

restricted environment and under the conditions proposed will be at least as safe, or safer, than a 

conventional aircraft (fixed wing or rotorcraft) operating with an airworthiness certificate 

without the restrictions and conditions proposed.

All of the UAV’s to be operated hereunder are less than 55 lbs. fully loaded, carry neither a

pilot nor passenger, carry no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and operate 

exclusively within a secured area as set out in the Ventus Operations Manual. Unlike other civil 

aircraft, operations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and monitored by both the 

operator, pursuant to the Manual’s requirements, and under the requirements and in compliance 

with local public safety requirements, to provide security for the area of operation as is now done 

with conventional inspections. The FAA will have advance notice of all operations. These safety

enhancements, which already apply to civil aircraft operated in connection with power 

generation inspections, provide a greater degree of safety to the public and property owners then 

conventional operations conducted with airworthiness certificates issued under 14 C.F.R.

Part 21, Subpart H. Lastly, application of these same criteria demonstrates that there is no

credible threat to national security posed by the UAV’s, due to their size, speed of operation,

location of operation, lack of explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and inability to carry

a substantial external load.
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 12

2. 14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b). Marking of the Aircraft

The regulation requires: When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the 

registration number is displayed on limited, restricted or light-sport category aircraft or

experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraft 

near each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more 

than 6 inches high, the words "limited," "restricted," "light-sport," "experimental," or 

"provisional," as applicable.

Even though the UAV will have no airworthiness certificate, an exemption may be

needed as the UAV will have no entrance to the cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which the 

words "limited," "restricted," "light-sport," "experimental," or "provisional," can be placed. 

Given the size of the UAV, two-inch lettering will be impossible. The word "experimental," 

may be placed on one of the rotor arms of each UAV, in compliance with §45.29 (f). The 

equivalent level of safety will be provided by having the UAVs marked on their rotor arm as 

required by §45.29 (f) where the pilot, observer and others working with the UAV will see the 

identification of the UAV as "experimental,".

The FAA has issued the following exemptions to this regulation to Exemptions Nos. 

10700, 8738, 10167 and 10167A.

3. 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) & (b): Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: Pilot in 

Command.

Sections 61.113 (a) & (b) limit private pilots to non-commercial operations. Because the

UAVs will not carry a pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can achieve the equivalent

level of safety of current operations by requiring the PIC operating the aircraft to have a private

pilot’s license rather than a commercial pilot’s license to operate these small UAVs. Unlike a

conventional aircraft that carries the pilot and passengers, Ventus’ UAVs are remotely controlled 

with no living thing on board. The area of operation is controlled and restricted, and all flights 

are planned and coordinated in advance as set forth in the Ventus Operations Manual VSI-005 

Rev. 2 (Manual). The level of safety provided by the requirements included in the Manual 

exceeds that provided by a single individual holding a commercial pilot’s certificate operating a 

conventional aircraft. The risks associated with the operation of the UAVs are so diminished 

from the level of risk associated with commercial operations contemplated by Part 61 when 
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 13

drafted, that allowing operations of these UAVs as requested with a private pilot as the PIC 

exceeds the present level of safety achieved by 14 C.F.R. §61.113 (a) & (b).

4. 14 C.F.R. §91.7(a): Civil aircraft airworthiness.

The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy

condition. As there will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the aircraft, should this

exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist for determining airworthiness.

Given the size of the aircraft and the requirements contained in the Manual for maintenance and

use of safety check lists prior to each flight, as set forth in Sections J, L and Q, an equivalent

level of safety will be provided.

5. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft.

Section 91.9 (b) (2) provides:

No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil aircraft ...

(2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by §21.5 of 

this chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved airplane or 

Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or 

any combination thereof.

The UAVs, given their size and configuration have no ability or place to carry such a flight

manual on the aircraft, not only because there is no pilot on board, but because there is no room 

or capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft.

The equivalent level of safety will be maintained by keeping the flight manual at the

ground control point where the pilot flying the UAV will have immediate access to it. The FAA

has issued the following exemptions to this regulation: Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299,

9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, 10167A, 10602, 32827, and 10700.
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 14

6. 14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight action

This regulation requires each pilot in command to take certain actions before flight to

insure the safety of flight. As FAA approved rotorcraft flight manuals will not be provided for 

the aircraft an exemption will be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be provided as set 

forth in the Manual. The PIC will take all actions including reviewing weather, flight battery 

requirements, landing and takeoff distances and aircraft performance data before initiation of 

flight.

7. 14 C.F.R. §91.109: Flight instruction:

Section 91.103 provides that no person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free 

balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual

controls.

UAVs and remotely piloted aircraft, by their design do not have fully functional dual

controls. Flight control is accomplished through the use of a control box that communicates with

the aircraft via radio communications. The FAA has approved exemptions for flight training

without fully functional dual controls for a number of aircraft and for flight instruction in

experimental aircraft. See Exemption Nos.5778K & 9862A. The equivalent level of safety

provided by the fact that neither a pilot nor passengers will be carried in the aircraft and by the

size and speed of the aircraft.

8. 14 C.F.R. §91.119: Minimum safe altitudes

Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119(d) 

allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person

operating the helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the

FAA. As this exemption is for a UAV that is a multi-rotor VTOL and the exemption requests 

authority to operate at altitudes up to 400 ft. AGL, or not more than 200 ft. above an elevated 

platform from which operations are planned, an exemption may be needed to allow such 

operations. As set forth herein, except for the limited conditions stated in the Manual, the UAV

will never operate at higher than 400 ft. AGL. It will however be operated in a restricted area 

with security perimeter, where buildings and people will not be exposed to operations without 

their pre-obtained consent.
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 15

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed of the UAVs

as well as the location where they will be operated. No flight will be taken without the 

permission of the property owner or local officials. Because of the advance notice to the property 

owner and participants in the filming activity, all affected individuals will be aware of the 

planned flight operations as set forth in the Manual. Compared to flight operations with aircraft 

or rotorcraft weighting far more than the maximum 55 lbs. proposed herein and the lack of

flammable fuel, any risk associated with these operations is far less than those presently

presented with conventional aircraft operating at or below 400 ft. AGL in the power generation

industry. In addition, the low-altitude operations of the UAVs will ensure separation between 

these small UAV operations and the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with 

Section 91.119.

9. 14 C.F.R. §91.121 Altimeter Settings

This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by

reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate

altimeter setting available before departure.” As the UAV may not have a barometric altimeter,

but instead a GPS altitude read out, an exemption may be needed. An equivalent level of safety 

will be achieved by the operator, pursuant to the Manual and Safety Check list, confirming the 

altitude of the launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight.

10. 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions

Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual from beginning “a flight in an airplane under

VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel

to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed – (1) During the

day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45

minutes.”

The batteries powering all of Ventus’ UAV’s provide approximately 35 minutes of 

powered flight. To meet the 30 minute reserve requirement in 14 CFR §91.151, UAV flights 

would be limited to approximately five (5) minutes in length. Given that this limitation would 

prohibit the flight of the UAV’s a longer time frame for flight in daylight or night VFR 

conditions is reasonable.
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 16

Ventus believes that an exemption from 14 CFR §91.151(a) falls within the scope of

prior exemptions. See Exemption 10673 (allowing Lockheed Martin Corporation to operate

without compliance with FAR 91.151 (a)). Operating the small UAV, in a tightly controlled area

where only people and property owners or official representatives who have signed waivers will

be allowed, with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel, does not engender the type of risks that

Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the small UAV.

Additionally, limiting UAV flights to 5 minutes would greatly reduce the utility for 

which the exemption will be granted.

Ventus believes that an equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to

25% of battery power. This restriction would be more than adequate to return the UAV’s to their

planned landing zone from anywhere in their limited operating area.

Similar exemptions have been granted to other operations, including Exemptions 2689F,

5745, 10673, and 10808.

11. 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and Registration

The regulation provides in pertinent part:

(a) Except as provided in § 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft

unless it has within it the following:

(1) An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate. . . .

(b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate

required by paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued

under §91.715 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to

passengers or crew.

All of Ventus’ UAV’s fully loaded weigh no more than 55 lbs and are operated without 

an onboard pilot. As such, there is no ability or place to carry certification and registration 

documents or to display them on the UAV’s.

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping these documents at the ground

control point where the pilot flying the UAV will have immediate access to them, to the extent

they are applicable to the UAV. The FAA has issued numerous exemptions to this regulation. A 
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 17

representative sample of other exceptions includes Exemption Nos. 9565, 9665, 9789, 9789A, 

9797, 9797A, 9816A, and 10700.

12. 14 C.F.R. §91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections

These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft

inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as 

provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of 

this chapter...,” and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43.

Given that these sections and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness

certificate, these sections will not apply to Ventus. Maintenance will be accomplished by Ventus

pursuant to the flight manual and operating handbook as referenced in the Manual.(See Sections 

L and Q) An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because these small UAVs are very 

limited in size and will carry a small payload and operate only in restricted areas for limited 

periods of time. If mechanical issues arise the UAV can land immediately and will be operating 

from no higher than 400 feet AGL. As provided in the Manual, Ventus will ensure that every

UAV is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance, and keep a log 

of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the operator is the person most familiar with the 

aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to provide the

equivalent level of safety.

13. The Extent Of Relief Ventus Seeks And The Reason Ventus Seeks Relief From 14 

C.F.R. § 21.185.

Ventus seeks relief from the airworthiness certificate requirements of the Federal

Aviation Regulations and proposes to commercially operate the DJI PHANTOM II and Inspire 1 

UAV, without an airworthiness certificate, for the special purpose of conducting aerial inspection 

services for its customers, pursuant to specific operating limitations and a Safety Management 

System (“SMS”). Ventus seeks relief from the airworthiness certificate requirements of 14 

C.F.R. § 21.185 to the extent that the DJI PHANTOM II and Inspire 1 UAV, which have not yet 

been type certificated by the FAA, may be operated as if they were a restricted category aircraft 

for a single, defined, special purpose operation (i.e., aerial inspection). 
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 18

Pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333 (“Section

333”), Ventus seeks relief from the airworthiness certificate requirements of the FAR because

operation of the DJI PHANTOM II and Inspire 1 UAV will not create a hazard to users of the 

NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Section 333 sets forth the 

requirements for considering whether a UAV will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the 

public or pose a threat to national security. Further, Section 333 provides the authority for such 

UAV to operate without airworthiness certification.

Specifically, Section 333 states the following, in part:

(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.--In making the determination under

subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum--

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight,

speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation

within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system

or the public or pose a threat to national security; and

(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness

certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for the

operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1set forth below, 

numerous factors, including the proven safe operational history of the DJI PHANTOM II, 

S1000 and Inspire 1 UAV in the NAS, as well as the specific parameters of Ventus’

intended operation pursuant to this exemption, demonstrate that the DJI PHANTOM II, 

S1000 and Inspire 1 UAV have in the past, and will continue in the future, to operate 

safely in the NAS without creating a hazard to other aircraft or people on the ground. 

Accordingly, the FAA may approve operation of the DJI PHANTOM II, S1000 and 

Inspire 1 UAV, without an airworthiness certificate, by setting forth specific operating

limitations to ensure a level of safety equivalent to what would be provided by 

airworthiness certification.
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 19

*********

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the

Federal Register, should it be determined that publication is needed:

Ventus seeks an exemption from the following rules:

14 C.F.R. §21, subpart H; 14 C.F.R 45.23(b); §§ 61.113(a) & (b); 91.7(a); 91.9 (b) (2);

91.103 (b);91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151 (a); 91.203(a) and (b); 91.405(a); 91.407 (a) 

(1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.409 (a) (2), 91.417 (a) & (b), as well as the restricted category 

airworthiness certification standards specified in 14 C.F.R. § 21.185 to operate

commercially unmanned vehicle (55lbs or less) for aerial inspections.

Approval of exemptions allowing commercial operations of UAVs in the power 

generation inspection industry will enhance safety by reducing risk. Conventional power 

generation inspections, using persons dangling from ropes at altitudes of 300 to 450 feet are 

potential cause for falls, death or injury. In contrast, a Ventus UAV weighing fewer than 55 lbs. 

and powered by batteries eliminates virtually all human risk to serious falls given that the PIC is 

on the ground. 

Every Ventus UAV is carried to the inspection site and not flown. The UAV’s will carry 

no passengers or crew and, therefore, will not expose them to the risks associated with manned 

aircraft flights. The operation of small UAVs, weighting less than 55 lbs., conducted in the strict

conditions outlined above, will provide an improved level of safety supporting the grant of the

exemptions requested herein, including exempting the Ventus from the requirements of Part 21 

and allowing commercial operations. These lightweight aircraft operate at slow speeds, close to 

the ground, and in a sterile environment and, as a result, are far safer than conventional

operations conducted by humans dangling from ropes.

Reasons Why Granting Ventus’s Request Would Be In The Public Interest

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing Ventus to safely, 

efficiently, and economically perform aerial inspection services of power generation facilities, 

onshore oil and gas platforms, pipelines and land developers Additionally, use of the Ventus 
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 20

UAV’s will increase worker safety by reducing human exposure to rope access work at extreme 

heights, increase the frequency of power generation inspections being performed thereby 

increase power plant safety and provide significant benefits to the reduction in costs associated 

with the maintenance of power generation facilities. Notably, the benefits of the proposed 

operation of the Ventus UAV will be realized without implicating any privacy issues.

Figures 4 & 5: Photos of Current Rope Access Inspection Techniques
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 21

Privacy:

All flights will occur over private or controlled access property with the property owner’s 

prior consent and knowledge. Aerial inspections will be of power generation equipment, 

production facilities or buildings in remote or uninhabited areas.

Set forth below are pictures of aerial inspections conducted in the day environment, as 

performed today using humans on ropes. The grant of this exemption request will provide

improved safety in day operations.

Flight Operations:

Flight Operations pursuant to the exemption sought would be limited to areas that are not 

in the proximity of airports or over populated areas. Ventus proposes to only conduct aerial 

inspection flight operations over private land, in rural areas of the United States that are not near 

populated areas, airports, helipads, or state roads.

Specifically, Ventus’ proposed areas of aerial inspections include rural areas that are:

1. Not populated areas as depicted on VFR Sectional Aeronautical Charts;

2. Not within five (5) miles of any airport or helipad;

3. Not within one hundred (100) meters of state roads having more than two lanes; and

4. Not within fifty (50) meters of state roads having two lanes or less.

Ventus has been operating all of its UAV’s by regulations such as the ICAO (International Civil 

Aviation Organization) and the FAA’s own national airspace regulations. In order to increase 

flight safety and prevent accidental flights in restricted areas, all of Ventus’ UAV’s will be 

operated utilizing Category “A” No Fly Zone restrictions. 
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 22

Figure 4: Example of Category “A” No Fly Zone for Ventus
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 23

A buffer or exclusion zone for flight operations will also be implemented around state

roads. Since the roads are represented geometrically as lines, the buffers result as a one hundred 

(100m) corridor around state roads with more than two lanes, and fifty (50) meters around state 

roads with two lanes or less. In summary, Ventus seeks to operate its UAV’s only over rural 

areas, while maintaining safe distances from any populated areas, airports, helipads, or 

roadways.

Operation Of Ventus’ UAV’s Will Be Conducted Pursuant To “VSI-005 UAS Operations 

Manual (For UAS’s under 55 lbs).”

Ventus’ Operations Manual VSI-005 will control operation UAV’s and will significantly 

contribute to maintaining the level of safety contemplated by the airworthiness certificate 

requirements from which Ventus now seeks relief. Pursuant to the Operations Manual and 14 

C.F.R. § 43.13, entitled Performance Rules (general), each person performing maintenance, 

alteration, or preventive maintenance on any of Ventus’ UAV’s, motors, propellers, hardware, 

guidance systems or appliances shall use the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the 

current manufacturer's maintenance manual or Instructions for Continued Airworthiness

prepared by its manufacturer, or other methods, techniques, and practices acceptable to the 

Administrator. Each person shall use the tools, equipment, and test apparatus necessary to assure 

completion of the work in accordance with accepted industry practices.

A copy of the Operations Manual, which is proprietary information to Ventus, is attached 

hereto as Exhibit B, and is to be held in a separate file pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.35(b).3

Flight Operations Of Ventus’ UAV’s Are Limited To Line Of Sight Of The PIC WithA 

Safety Observer.

Ventus will only utilize PIC’s with a valid Recreational or Private Pilot rating certificate 

issued by the FAA for operation of all UAV’s and a Class II Medical Certificate. Additionally, 

all pilots will be assisted by a safety observer. The pilot in command and safety observer must 

meet the requirements as set forth by the Operations Manual adopted by Ventus for flight

operations of the UAV’s. 
VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 24

CONLUSION:

Satisfaction of the criteria provided in Section 333 of the Reform Act of 2012--size, 

weight, speed, operating capabilities, proximity to airports and populated areas and operation 

within visual line of sight and national security – provide more than adequate justification for the 

grant of the requested exemptions allowing commercial operation of applicant’s UAS in the

power generation industry pursuant to the Manual appended hereto.

_____________________________

Submitted on January 20, 2015

Marco F. Zvanik (Pro Se.)

7202 Greystone Lane

Frisco, Texas 75034

Tel: (214) 908-9444

Email: mzvanik@ventuswind.com