alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice of a determination concerning a petition to add a class of employees from the Feed Materials Production Center (FMPC), in Fernald, Ohio, to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938, Telephone 1-877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by email to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On June 21, 2018, the Secretary of HHS                           ( print page 33223)                        determined that the following class of employees does not meet the statutory criteria for addition to the SEC as authorized under EEOICPA:                

“(1) All employees of the Department of Energy (DOE), its predecessor agencies, and their contractors and subcontractors who worked in any area of the Feed Materials Production Center at Fernald, Ohio, from January 1, 1984, through December 31, 1989; and (2) all employees of the DOE, its predecessor agencies, National Lead of Ohio, or NLO, Inc., in any area of the Feed Materials Production Center from January 1, 1979, through December 31, 1983.”

Authority:42 U.S.C.7384q.

 John J. Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2018-15094 Filed 7-16-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                      NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
 
                               AS OF JUNE 1, 1997
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                               <C>
N.E.T. APLA, Inc................................................  (State of Incorporation: Delaware)
 
N.E.T. China, Inc...............................................  (State of Incorporation: Delaware)
 
N.E.T. Credit Corporation.......................................  (State of Incorporation: California)
 
N.E.T. Europe Ltd...............................................  (Incorporated Under the Laws of England)
 
N.E.T. Europe S.A...............................................  (Incorporated Under the Laws of France)
 
N.E.T. Federal, Inc.............................................  (State of Incorporation: Delaware)
 
N.E.T. International, Inc.......................................  (Incorporated Under the Laws of Barbados)
 
Network Equipment Technologies Europe GmbH......................  (Incorporated Under the Laws of Germany)
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1222

MUHAMMED WALLIYULLAH KARIM ABDUL QADIR, a/k/a

Muhammad W.K. Abdul Qadir,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES H. MCBRIDE, individually and as ExMayor and Head of Cheraw Town Council; BILL

TAYLOR, Sergeant, individually and as the

Cheraw Town Administrator; GEORGE HARTZELL,

individually and as the Magistrate for the

Town of Cheraw; JAMES TILLEY, individually and

as the Magistrate of the County of Chesterfield; HARRY DRAKEFORD, individually and as

Ex-Chief for the Town of Cheraw; J. A. GRAVES,

individually and Chief of the Cheraw City Police Department; JOHN SPEARS, individually and

as officer of the Cheraw City Police Department; RANDY MALLOY, individually and as officer of the Cheraw City Police Department;

OFFICER MCCLAIN, individually and as officer

of the Cheraw City Police Department; UNKNOWN

NAMES OF INSURANCE COMPANIES OR AGENTS FOR

DEFENDANTS, individually and as agents for

each insurance company; UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS OF

THE CITY OF CHERAW; COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,

SOUTH CAROLINA; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA;

UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS OF CHESTERFIELD GENERAL

HOSPITAL, individually and in their official

capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-94-780-4-19BC)
2
3

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Muhammed Walliyullah Karim, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod,

GRIGGS, SPRUILL & HARRIS, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal

on the reasoning of the district court. Karim Abdul Qadir v.

McBride, No. CA-94-780-4-19BC (D.S.C. Feb. 1, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
4
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

                CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

        Computation of Ratio of EBITDA, as Adjusted, to Interest Expense

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Year Ended December 31,
                                                        --------------------------------------------
                                                         2001      2000      1999     1998     1997
                                                        ------   -------   -------   ------   ------
<S>                                                     <C>       <C>       <C>      <C>      <C>
Income (loss) before Income Taxes....................   (7,317)   56,138    77,027   26,816   44,316
Add:  Interest Expense, Net..........................   16,316    18,756    16,345   16,954   13,977
Exclude Gain/Loss on Fixed Assets....................      802       (28)      (13)     308    1,054
Depreciation (Cash Flow).............................   30,204    28,852    26,331   26,659   24,374
                                                        ------   -------   -------   ------   ------

EBITDA, As Adjusted..................................   40,005   103,718   119,690   70,737   83,721
                                                        ------   -------   -------   ------   ------

Interest Expense, Net................................   16,316    18,756    16,345   16,954   13,977

Ratio EBITDA, As Adjusted to Interest Expense, Net ..      2.5       5.5       7.3      4.2      6.0
</TABLE>

                                       1
256 La. 611

#### Douglas M. JONES v. SOUTHERN TUPELO LUMBER COMPANY et al.

No. 50563.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Douglas M. Jones applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Livingston.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
        - News Releases

#  News Releases 

**Collected by:** U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 

**Archived since:**Sep, 2013

**Description:**
This collection includes HHS news and announcements from 1991+.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Science & Health

**Creator:**    	    OS/ASPA

## Narrow Your Results

**Creator**

Sort By:
- Count
- (A-Z)
              - HHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs (ASPA) (1)

**Group**

Sort By:
- Count
- (A-Z)
              - HHS News Releases (1)

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear
            - Date :  2013           X        
            - Date :  2013           X        
            - Categories :  HHS Administrative           X        

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (1 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### 	  Title:       Statement by HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Supreme Court Ruling on Defense of Marriage Act    	  

### URL:     https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2013/06/26/statement-hhs-secretary-kathleen-sebelius-supreme-court-ruling-defense-marriage-act.html

**Description:**	  	Today's Supreme Court decision finding the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional is a victory for equality, which is a core belief of this administration.	  

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

**Creator:**    	    HHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs (ASPA)

**Date:**        	2013        

**Group:**    	    HHS News Releases

**Categories:**        	HHS Administrative        

Page 1 of 1  (1 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
#### Martin LEMLICH and Ray Lemlich, his wife, Appellants, v. Eleanor M. TOWNSEND and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 73-16.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 9, 1973.

Martin Lemlich, Miami, for appellants.

Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl, Miami and Michael B. Davis, West Palm Beach, for appellees.

Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and SAM SPECTOR, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

See Karkeet v. Snyder, Fla.App.1973, 275 So.2d 302.
# C_2023329EN.01001701.xml

| 18.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/17

---

Order of the President of the Court of 21 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bihor — Romania) — M.I.A., P.R.-M., V.-C.I-C, F.C.R., P (formerly T.) Ş-B., D.R., P.E.E., F.I. v Tribunalul Cluj, Tribunalul Mureş, Tribunalul Hunedoara, Tribunalul Suceava, Tribunalul Galaţi, in the presence of: Consiliul National pentru Combaterea Discriminârii

(Case C-644/21, (1) Tribunalul Cluj and Others)

(2023/C 329/21)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 95, 28.2.2022.

---
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual  Report of Sierra Health  Services,  Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  I, Anthony
M. Marlon, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Anthony M. Marlon, M.D.
Anthony M. Marlon, M.D.
March 24, 2003

---
#### Gayla WOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-133.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 16, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 4 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 4

  Authorizing the Clerk of the House to inform the President that the 
House of Representatives had elected Thomas S. Foley, a Representative 
   from the State of Washington, Speaker, and Donnald K. Anderson, a 
       citizen of the State of California, Clerk of the House of 
                            Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Whitten submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the Clerk of the House to inform the President that the 
House of Representatives had elected Thomas S. Foley, a Representative 
   from the State of Washington, Speaker, and Donnald K. Anderson, a 
       citizen of the State of California, Clerk of the House of 
                            Representatives.

    Resolved, That the Clerk be instructed to inform the President of 
the United States that the House of Representatives has elected Thomas 
S. Foley, a Representative from the State of Washington, Speaker; and 
Donnald K. Anderson, a citizen of the State of California, Clerk of the 
House of Representatives of the One Hundred Third Congress.

                                 <all>
```
251 La. 70

#### Ecklin CHAUVIN, Jr. v. Wingate M. WHITE, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 48925.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1967

In re: Ecklin Chauvin, Jr., applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. Considering the return made by the Attorney General and the Parole Board’s, there is no merit to the application.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 2, 2022

No. 04-22-00097-CV

Sharyn DACBERT,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee

v.

MEDICAL CENTER OPHTHALMOLOGY ASSOCIATES, L.L.P. and Michael Singer,

Appellees/Cross- Appellants

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-06670

Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s/Cross-Appellee’s Third Motion to Extend Time for Filing 

Appellant’s/Cross-Appellee’s Brief is hereby GRANTED. Appellant’s/Cross-Appellee’s Brief is 

due on or before June 6, 2022.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of June, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
Exhibit 32.1
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Joseph J. Ueberroth

Joseph J. UeberrothChairman, President andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)July 30, 2008
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit No. 4
Fashion Tech International, Inc.
Form 10-K
File No. 2-93231-NY



$22,000.00                                   04/12/1999

Fashion Tech International, Inc., after date, for value
received, I/we jointly and severally, promise to pay to
SONOS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION  or order Twenty Two Thousand
and no/100 DOLLARS with interest payable when due at the
rate of 8 percent per annum form 04-12-99 until paid, both
before and after judgment.  And we hereby agree, that in
case this note after maturity, is referred to an attorney,
either with or without suit, to pay a reasonable attorney's
fee.  The holder shall have the right to declare this note
due for default in payment of interest.

                         Fashion Tech International, Inc.

                         By: /s/
                             E-16
<PAGE>
257 La. 452

#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Hoyt GARRICK.

No. 51056.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 18, 1971.

In re: Hoyt Garrick, applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Washington. 242 So.2d 278.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Nos. 96-10014 & 96-10015

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TERRY MARTIN CHAMBERS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(4:92-CR-185-E)

October 29, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Terry Martin Chambers appeals his convictions for bank robbery and using

and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence. Chambers robbed a second bank

after pleading guilty to and while awaiting sentenc e on a prior bank robbery.1 United States v. Carr

, 740 F.2d 339 (5th C ir. 1984), c ert

. denied

, 471 U.S. 1004

(1985).

2 Chambers contends that the district court should have allowed the withdrawal of

his guilty pleas, claiming that they were coerced and because the government could

not prove the presence of a gun during the robbery. Chambers also contends that

the district court abused its discretion in denying his recusal motion, asserting that

the district court showed prejudice by summarily denying his motion, imputing

pe rjury to him, and dismissing his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Chambers further claims that his offense level should have be en reduced for his

minor role in the offenses and for acceptance of responsibility. Finally, Chambers

contends that the government failed to prove that the banks’ deposits were insured

by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a requirement for establishing

federal jurisdiction.

The record clearly reflects that: (1) the guilty pleas were knowingly and

voluntarily entered; (2) withdrawal was not warranted; (3) Ch ambers did not

explain his delay in moving to withdraw the pleas; (4) Chambers did not assert his

innocence; and (5) the performa nce of Chambers’ counsel did not justify

withdrawal of the pleas. 1 There is nothing in the record to occasion a reasonable

person to harbor any doubt regarding the district court’s impartiality. The district2 United States v. Jordan , 49 F.3d 152 (5th Cir. 1995).

3 U.S.S.G. §§ 3B1.2, comment. (nn.1 & 3); §§

3E1.1, comment. (nn.3 & 4); United States v. Mitchell

, 31 F.3d 271 (5th Cir.), cert

. denied

, 115 S.Ct. 455 (1994).

4 United States v. Branch , 46 F.3d 440 (5th Cir. 1995).

3 court did not abuse its discretion in denying Chambers’ motion for recusal. 2

The record contains no support for either the contention that Chambers had

a minor role in the offense or that he accepted responsibility. The district court did

not err in denying these reductions in Chambers’ offense level. 3

Chambers stipulated that the banks were insured by the FDIC; no more proof

was required to establish federal jurisdiction. 4

No issue raised on appeal has m erit and the judgments appealed are

AFFIRMED.
# C_2022463EN.01003902.xml

| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — Zegers v Commission

(Case T-663/21) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Retirement pension - Transfer of national pension rights - Condition requiring acquisition before entry into the service of the European Union - Recognition by the national authority of a period after entry into the service of the European Union)

(2022/C 463/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tanja Zegers (Hoeilaart, Belgium) (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and M. Brauhoff, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the European Commission’s decision of 3 December 2020, by which the Commission rejected her request for transfer to the European Union of pension rights she had acquired in the Netherlands.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 17.1.2022.

---
##### 



Exhibit 23.2 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Parallel Petroleum Corporation
Midland, Texas We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3
(No.33-90296, No. 333-112518 and No. 333-119725) and Form S-8 (No. 33-57348, No. 333-34617, No.
333-669380 and No. 333-117533) of Parallel Petroleum Corporation of our reports dated February 28,
2005, relating to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and the effectiveness of Parallel
Petroleum Corporations internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP Houston, Texas March 15, 2005