alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022266EN.01002802.xml

| 11.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/28

---

Order of the General Court of 7 April 2022 — Bloom v Parliament and Council

(Case T-645/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Common fisheries policy - Regulation (EU) 2021/1139 - European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund - Financial support granted under shared management with the Member States - Ineligible operations or expenditure - Derogations from ineligibility - Association for the protection of the marine environment - Legislative act - No individual concern - No direct concern - Right to effective judicial protection - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 266/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bloom (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Saynac and L. Chovet-Ballester, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: G. Ricci and I. Terwinghe, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Naert and A. Nowak-Salles, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking partial annulment of Regulation (EU) 2021/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2021 establishing the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1004 (OJ 2021 L 247, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the European Commission’s application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the European Commission’s application to intervene.

| 3. | Bloom shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Bloom shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.

| 4. | The Commission shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Commission shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 481, 29.11.2021.

---
#### SHELBY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF SHELBY, OHIO, Petitioner, v. Raymond CLOUD, Respondent.

No. 41314.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 16, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 18, 1972.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.
#### James M. RAMSEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-222.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 24, 1973.

James M. Ramsey, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          This schedule contains summary financial information extracted for the
twelve months ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         149,895,000
<SECURITIES>                                    14,452,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,151,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,334,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212,705,000
<PP&E>                                         151,273,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,383,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 317,610,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,383,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           289,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     276,360,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   317,610,000
<SALES>                                        131,159,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,159,000
<CGS>                                           75,820,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   75,820,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,235,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (3,293,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,398,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                       810,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,588,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,588,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.10


</TABLE>
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00450**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  00450\00450_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 00450\00450_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 00450\00450_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 00450\00450_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 00450\00450_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 00450\00450_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00450\Certification Statement Plant ID 00450.pdf Plant certification statement x 00450\Supporting Documents\00450_D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00450\Supporting Documents\00450_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 00450\Supporting Documents\00450_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 00450\00450_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00450\00450_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7370** 

JEFFEREY A. HURLEY , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 2:12

- cv - 00408

- RBS

- TEM )

Submitted : December 19 , 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jefferey A. Hurley, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding p recedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jefferey A. Hurley seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484

- 85 (2000)
. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hurley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Hurley’s motion to compel and motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
# C_2023112EN.01000601.xml

| 27.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — ZS v Zweckverband ‘Kommunale Informationsverarbeitung Sachsen’ KISA, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts

(Case C-560/21, KISA) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - Article 38(3) - Data protection officer - Prohibition on dismissing data protection officer for performing his or her tasks - Requirement for functional independence - National legislation prohibiting the dismissal of a data protection officer without just cause)

(2023/C 112/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ZS

Defendant: Zweckverband ‘Kommunale Informationsverarbeitung Sachsen’ KISA, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts

Operative part of the judgment

The second sentence of Article 38(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which provides that a controller or a processor may dismiss a data protection officer who is a member of staff of that controller or processor solely where there is just cause, even if the dismissal is not related to the performance of that officer’s tasks, in so far as such legislation does not undermine the achievement of the objectives of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 24.1.2022.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF DATASTREAM SYSTEMS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Datastream
Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Larry G. Blackwell, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ LARRY G. BLACKWELLLarry G. BlackwellChief Executive OfficerDatastream Systems, Inc.March 9, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                      NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                     Wholly Owned Subsidiaries of Registrant
                               As of June 1, 2003


N.E.T. APLA, Inc. (State of Incorporation: Delaware)

N.E.T. Cone Sul do Brasil Ltda. (Incorporated Under the Laws of Brazil)

N.E.T. de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Incorporated Under the Laws of Mexico)

N.E.T. Southeast Asia Pte Ltd. (Incorporated Under the Laws of Singapore)

N.E.T. China, Inc. (State of Incorporation: Delaware)

N.E.T. Europe, Ltd. (Incorporated Under the Laws of England)

N.E.T. Europe S.AS. (Incorporated Under the Laws of France)

N.E.T. Federal, Inc. (State of Incorporation: Delaware)

N.E.T. Japan, Inc. (State of Incorporation: Delaware)

Netdotcom Broadband Technologies, Inc. (Incorporated Under the Laws of Canada)

Network Equipment Technologies Europe GmbH (Incorporated Under the Laws of
Germany)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL18-149-000]

                    On July 9, 2018, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. EL18-149-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into whether PSEG Energy Resources & Trade, LLC's rates for Reactive Service may be unjust and unreasonable.                     *PSEG Energy Resources & Trade, LLC,*                     164 FERC 61,018 (2018).                

                    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL18-149-000, established pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

                    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL18-149-000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory                           ( print page 32664)                        Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21 days of the date of issuance of the order.                

Dated: July 9, 2018.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-14981 Filed 7-12-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Harold S. EDWARDS and Virginia Edwards, Individually, etc. v. The STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, et al. EMMCO INSURANCE COMPANY et al. v. The STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, et al.

No. 53286.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 20, 1973.

In re: Harold S. Edwards and Virginia Edwards, Individually, and as administrators of the estate of their minor son, Lawson Edwards, and Emmco Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 271 So.2d 672.

Wrti denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from audited
financial statements for period ended June 30, 1997 and reference is made to the
notes accompanying such financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   204
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,733
<OTHER-SE>                                     925,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       204
<SALES>                                          6,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,139
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,441
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,302)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                146,545<F1>
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   134,243
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>See  Note  B to  financial  statements  regarding  spin-off  of  assets  and
    liabilities.
</FN>
        




</TABLE>
# C_2022109EN.01001302.xml

| 7.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/13

---

Order of the President of the Court of 5 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — PW v Eurowings GmbH

(Case C-697/21) (1)

(Air transport - Compensation to air passengers in the event of cancellation of flights - Means by which the cost of the ticket is reimbursed - Reimbursement by travel voucher - Request to be reimbursed in cash)

(2022/C 109/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: PW

Defendant: Eurowings GmbH

Operative part of the order

Case C-697/21 is removed from the Register of the Court.

---

(1)  Date of filing: 19/11/2021.

---
#### In the Matter of LeJohn M. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Diane S., Appellant; Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent.

[656 NYS2d 986]

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs *(see, Matter of Cherilyn P.,*192 AD2d 1084). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Dillon, J.—Neglect.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.
<PAGE>

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-49549, No. 333-59855, No. 333-30561,
No. 333-89908 and No. 333-64477) and Form S-3 (No. 333-44559, No. 333-30473,
No. 333-70937 and No. 333-45463) of our report dated April 20, 1999 appearing
in P-Com, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended
December 31, 1998.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
September 24, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                         [ARTHUR ANDERSEN LOGO]




                                                                     EXHIBIT 23


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report
and to all references to our Firm included in or made part of this Form 10-K and
to the incorporation by reference of our report included in this Form 10-K into
the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos.
33-44012, 33-44599, 33-64032, 333-2676 and 333-70057) and on Form S-3 (File
No. 333-89649).


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Denver, Colorado,
  April 13, 2000.