alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION**

**302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Mary G. Merritt, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-QSB of Preferred Voice, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report. 

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have: 

 

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or cause such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on such evaluation; and 

 

c. disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting; 

 

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls. 

 

/s/ Mary G. Merritt

 

Mary G. Merritt 

Vice President Finance 

(Principal Executive Officer  

and Principal Financial Officer) 

November 14, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

          - [NARA-2018-044]

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice; SES Performance Review Board appointments.

# SUMMARY:

The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is appointing members of NARA's Performance Review Board (PRB). The members of the PRB are: Debra Steidel Wall, Deputy Archivist of the United States; William J. Bosanko, Chief Operating Officer; and Micah M. Cheatham, Chief of Management and Administration. These appointments supersede all previous appointments.

# DATES:

These appointments are effective on July 19, 2018.

# ADDRESSES:

Valorie Findlater, Office of Human Capital, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Valorie Findlater at 301-837-3754.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The authority for this notice is 5 U.S.C. 4314(c), which also requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES Performance Review Boards. The Board shall review the initial appraisal                           ( print page 34165)                        of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor and recommend final action to the appointing authority regarding matters related to senior executive performance.                

David S. Ferriero,

Archivist of the United States.

[FR Doc. 2018-15407 Filed 7-18-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
        - News Releases

#  News Releases 

**Collected by:** U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 

**Archived since:**Sep, 2013

**Description:**
This collection includes HHS news and announcements from 1991+.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Science & Health

**Creator:**    	    OS/ASPA

## Narrow Your Results

**Creator**

Sort By:
- Count
- (A-Z)
              - HHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs (ASPA) (1)

**Categories**

Sort By:
- Count
- (A-Z)
              - Fraud (1)

**Group**

Sort By:
- Count
- (A-Z)
              - HHS News Releases (1)

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear
            - Date :  2015           X        
            - Date :  2015           X        
            - HHS_Official :  Richard Kronick, Sylvia Mathews Burwell           X        

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (1 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### 	  Title:       National patient safety efforts save 87,000 lives and nearly $20 billion in costs    	  

### URL:     https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2015/12/01/national-patient-safety-efforts-save-lives-and-costs.html

**Description:**	  	A report released by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) today shows that thanks in part to provisions of the Affordable Care Act, an estimated 87,000 fewer patients died in hospitals and nearly $20 billion in health care costs were saved as a result of a reduction in hospital-acquired conditions from 2010 to 2014.	  

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

**Creator:**    	    HHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs (ASPA)

**Date:**        	2015        

**Group:**    	    HHS News Releases

**Categories:**    	    Fraud

**HHS Official:**        	Richard Kronick, Sylvia Mathews Burwell        

Page 1 of 1  (1 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
#### Michael V. COSTELLO, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 71-958.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 22, 1971.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### Peay, Receiver, etc., vs. Ramsey.

R is not within the power of the legislature to compel the Receiver of the *Real Estate Bank*to receive the bonds of the State issued to the *State Bank*in payments of debts due to the *Real Estate Bank. .*

*Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Com*t.

Hon. John J. Clendenin, Circuit Judge!

S. H. Hempstead for the appellant.

Watkins & Gallagher, for the appellee.

*92Mr. Chief Justice English

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Peay, as Receiver in Chancery of the assets of the Real Estate Bank, brought an action of debt, in the Pulaski Circuit Court, against Ramsey, on a bond for $200, which constituted a part of the assets of the bank.

The defendant pleaded a tender before suit, in “ bonds of the “ State of Arkansas, issued by said State to and for the benefit “ and in behalf of the Bank of the State,” etc.

The plaintiff demurred to the plea, the Court overruled the demurrer, and the plaintiff declining to plead over, final judgment was rendered for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.

If it was the intention of the legislature, as it perhaps was, by the act of 12th January, 1853. *(Pamphlet Acts of*1862, *p.*196), to compel the Receiver of the Real Estate Bank to receive the bonds of the State issued to the *Bank of the State*in payment of debts due to the *Real Estate*Bank, the act is in conflict with that provision of the Constitution of the United States which declares that *no State shall make any thing but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts.*

The Bank of the State being exclusively a State institution, debts due to it are in effect due to the State, and she may provide for their payment in her own bonds, as she has done, or in any thing else that she is willing to accept in lieu of money. See *Fagan, etc. vs. Stillwell,*19 *Ark.*285.

But the debts due the Real Estate Bank do not belong to the State. They are held by the Receiver in trust for the benefit of the creditors of the bank, under the deed of assignment, and the individuals who compose the stockholders of the bank, etc.

The Real Estate Bank was in no way bound for the payment of the bonds issued by the State for the benefit of the Bank of the State, and if the legislature could compel the Receiver of the Real Estate Bank to take these bonds in payment of debts due to it, they could also make the paper of any bank, or the bonds of any other corporation or State, however depreciated, a legal tender in payment of such debts. (See *Paup et al. vs. Drew,*10 *How.*219; 2 *Story on Con. sec.*1372.

*93The judgment of the Court below is reversed, and the cause remanded, etc.

Absent, Mr. Justice Rector.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2036

PHILLIP MICHAEL PRIDGEN, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JURGEN LEIJEKKEN, CEO Hireright; JANET MILLER, Manager, Hireright; 

WILL WAINRIGHT, Escalation Specialist,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01323-CCB)

Submitted: November 29, 2018 Decided: December 3, 2018

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Michael Pridgen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Meredith Lynn Schramm-Strosser, 

LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Michael Pridgen, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice his civil action for lack of personal jurisdiction. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial 

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Because it is possible that Pridgen 

could cure the defects in his complaint through amendment, the district court’s order he 

seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, 807 F.3d 619, 623-25, 628-30 (4th Cir. 2015);

Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 

1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to 

the district court with instructions to allow Pridgen to file an amended complaint. We 

deny Pridgen’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
#### Gus E. JOHNSON and David R. Wise, Appellants, v. STOCKTON, WHATLEY, DAVIN & COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 74-15.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 13, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 15.1




                  ACCOUNTANTS' AWARENESS LETTER



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


Re:  Global Marine Inc. Registration Statements

We are aware that our report dated May 10, 2000, on our review of
the condensed consolidated interim financial information of
Global Marine Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of and for the
period ended March 31, 2000 and included in the Company's quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in (i)
the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-32088, 33-40961, and 33-63326),
respectively, for the Global Marine Inc. 1989 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan, (ii) the prospectus constituting part of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No.
33-40266) for the Global Marine Savings Incentive Plan, (iii) the
prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-40961) for the Global
Marine Inc. 1990 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, (iv)
the prospectus constituting part of the Company's  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-57691) for the Global
Marine Inc. 1994 Non-Employee Stock Option and Incentive Plan,
(v) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-80383)
for the Global Marine 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, and
(vi) the combined prospectus constituting part of the Company's
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 33-58577
and 333-49807) for the proposed offering of up to $500,000,000 of
debt securities, preferred stock, and/or common stock.  Pursuant
to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report
should not be considered a part of any of said registration
statements prepared or certified by us within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
May 11, 2000
#### Michael R. HOGAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF IOWA, Appellee.

No. 91-2573.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 15, 1991.

Decided Dec. 24, 1991.

*225Paul T. Shinkle of Cedar Falls, Iowa, argued, for appellant.

Thomas McGrane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Des Moines, Iowa, argued, for appellee.

Before BOWMAN, Circuit Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and BEAM, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Michael R. Hogan appeals from an order of the district court1 dismissing his habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm.

Hogan is presently confined in Nevada under a sentence of death arising from a 1984 murder. *See Hogan v. State,*103 Nev. 21, 732 P.2d 422, *cert. denied,*484 U.S. 872, 108 S.Ct. 201, 98 L.Ed.2d 153 (1987). Hogan filed the instant habeas petition seeking to void a 1971 Iowa conviction for manslaughter, which was used as an aggravating circumstance in the penalty phase of the murder trial.

The district court correctly held that Hogan was not “in custody” for purposes of § 2254. The sentence for the 1971 Iowa conviction expired in 1974 when Hogan was discharged from parole. *See Hogan v. State,*454 N.W.2d 360, 360 (Iowa 1990). In *Maleng v. Cook,*490 U.S. 488, 492, 109 S.Ct. 1923, 1926, 104 L.Ed.2d 540 (1989) (per curiam), the Supreme Court held that “once the sentence for a conviction has completely expired, an individual is not ‘in custody’ under that conviction for purposes of habeas corpus attack (and therefore a federal court has no jurisdiction),” even though the conviction was used to enhance a subsequent conviction. *Taylor v. Armontrout,*877 F.2d 726, 726 (8th Cir.1989) (per curiam). *See also Flittie v. Solem,*882 F.2d 325, 326-29 (8th Cir.1989) (en banc) (Beam, J., concurring).

Moreover, it is clear that since neither petitioner nor his Nevada custodian was within the State of Iowa, a federal court sitting in Iowa lacked in personam jurisdiction to entertain Hogan’s habeas petition or to grant him habeas relief. *See Lee v. United States,*501 F.2d 494, 501 (8th Cir.1974).

Accordingly, the judgment of dismissal for want of jurisdiction is affirmed.2
      *See*8th Cir.R. 47B.

. The Honorable David R. Hansen, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

. Our disposition is, of course, without prejudice to Hogan filing a habeas corpus petition challenging his death sentence in federal district court in Nevada. *See Taylor,*877 F.2d at 726-27 *226
        *(Malerig*permits habeas challenge to current sentence as enhanced by expired sentence).
#### Leroy TROY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-502.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 26, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Walter DAVIS v. Charles C. FOTI, Jr., Sheriff.

No. 62040.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 15, 1978.

In re: Walter Davis, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied. It appears that defendant has not been sentenced twice for the same crime. His sentence on 1/9/76 in Section C, Criminal District Court # 251-374 was for a different offense than that on 2/5/74 Section G, Criminal District Court # 239-823, although in the former instance his multiple bill incorporated as a prior conviction that in # 239-823.
#### Application of Bayani Virata FAYLONA.

No. 61475.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 3, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 3, 1978.

*1348In re: Bayani Virata Faylona applying for Admission to the Louisiana Bar.

ORDER

Writ granted.

MARCUS, Justice.

IT IS ORDERED that the Committee on Bar Admissions permit Bayani Virata Fay-lona to take the Bar Examination commencing February 13, 1978. Prior to certification, the Committee shall hold a hearing at which applicant shall be afforded an opportunity to demonstrate that the law school of the University of Manila, from which applicant graduated, satisfies the standards for approval of the American Bar Association.

SANDERS, C. J., dissents.

SUMMERS, J., dissents for reasons assigned.

DIXON, J.,

concurs in the order, being of the opinion the graduate degree in law from Tulane, preceded by graduation from the school of law of the U. of Manila may satisfy the requirements for taking the bar exam.

SANDERS, C. J.,

dissents from this action, but would instruct the Committee on Bar Admissions to develop rules governing foreign law schools.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents. The showing made does not satisfy the rules applicable to admission. Due to the late application the Association has had no opportunity to determine applicant’s qualifications.
Exhibit 23.1
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Virco Mfg.Corporation of our reports dated March 18, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of Virco Mfg. Corporation, Virco Mfg. Corporation management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Virco Mfg. Corporation, included in the Annual Report toStockholders of Virco Mfg. Corporation for the year ended January 31,2005.
Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Virco Mfg. Corporation listed in Item15. This schedule is the responsibility of Virco Mfg. Corporation’s management. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, as to which the dateis March 18, 2005, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relationto the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects theinformation set forth therein.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:
(1)  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-65096) pertaining to the Virco Mfg. Corporation 1993Stock Incentive Plan, (2)  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-32539) pertaining to the Virco Mfg. Corporation 1997Stock Incentive Plan, (3)  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-51717) pertaining to the Virco Mfg. CorporationEmployee Stock Ownership Plan, and (4)  Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-74832) pertaining to the Virco Mfg. Corporation401(K) Savings Plan
of our report dated March 18, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of VircoMfg. Corporation incorporated herein by reference, our report dated March 18, 2005, with respect toVirco Mfg. Corporation management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of VircoMfg. Corporation, incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respectto the financial statement schedule of Virco Mfg. Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) of Virco Mfg. Corporation.    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Los Angeles, California
#### Margaret MICELI v. The UNITED STATES of America.

No. 6114.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Dec. 15, 1936.

James R. Fleming, of Ft. Wayne, Ind., for appellee.

Before EVANS and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It is ordered by the court that this cause be docketed in this court and that the appeal taken on November 6, 1936, be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00894-CR

Adam Paul EANNARINO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR8490

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED November 10, 2015.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
#### GOLDFARB ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. MOORE MEATS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-253.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 24, 1973.

Byrd V. Duke, Jr., North Miami, for appellant.

Verne L. Freeland, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Luzi, Fla.App.1967, 194 So.2d 63; Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Morgan, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 632; Land v. Patroni, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 94.