alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending March 28, 2003 as filed
withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Hubert A. J. Whyte, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Hubert A. J. Whyte
                                        -----------------------
                                        Hubert A. J. Whyte
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        June 19, 2003

In connection with the Annual Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending March 28, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John F. McGrath, Jr. Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ John F. McGrath
                                        -----------------------
                                        John F. McGrath
                                        Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                                        June 19, 2003
# C_2022463EN.01004001.xml

| 5.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 463/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2022 — Les Bordes Golf International v EUIPO — Mast-Jägermeister (LES BORDES)

(Case T-696/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark LES BORDES - Earlier international figurative mark consisting of inter alia a stag’s head - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2022/C 463/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Les Bordes Golf International (Saint-Laurent-Nouan, France) (represented by: M. Maier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Mast-Jägermeister SE (Wolfenbüttel, Germany) (represented by: C. Drzymalla, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Les Bordes Golf International, seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 September 2021 (Case R 67/2021-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Les Bordes Golf International to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Les Bordes Golf International to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 2, 3.1.2022.

---
# Leases
Exhibit 99





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Solely in connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Retractable Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2002, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Thomas J. Shaw, Chief Executive Officer, and Douglas W. Cowan, Chief Financial Officer, do hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.








/s/    Thomas J. Shaw THOMAS J. SHAWPRESIDENT, CHAIRMAN, ANDCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/s/    Douglas W. Cowan DOUGLAS W. COWANCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
# C_2007023EN.01S00301.xml

| 1.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 1 February 2007, in Official Journal of the European Union C 23 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species —25th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/..........). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/sales_agents_en.html).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu.

Image

---
EXHIBIT 11
  
                         GTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   CALCULATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE 
  
  
                                                       Three Months Ended
                                                            March 31     
                                                       1998          1997   
                                                         (In Thousands)
  
  Net income (loss):   
     Before extraordinary charges                    $ 141,723      $665,347 
     Extraordinary charges                            (319,523)         -    
     Consolidated net income (loss)                  $(177,800)     $665,347 
  
  Average common shares                                959,449       960,434
  
  Adjustments to common shares:
     Add:  Employees' stock and 
             stock option plans                          8,469         3,820
  
  Adjusted average common shares                       967,918       964,254
  
  EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
     Basic (1) 
       Before extraordinary charges                      $ .15          $.69 
       Extraordinary charges                              (.33)           - 
           Consolidated                                  $(.18)         $.69
  
     Diluted (2)
       Before extraordinary charges                      $ .15          $.69
       Extraordinary charges                              (.33)           - 
           Consolidated                                  $(.18)         $.69 
   
  (1)   Computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common
        stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares
        outstanding during the period.  
  
  (2)   Reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or
        other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into
        common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock.
#### In the Interest of H. J., a Child. Juvenile Court Case No. 11451.

No. 2486.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

May 14, 1969.

Appeal from Juvenile Court, Orange County; D. A. Yergey, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                                                          Exhibit 12



                                                                                   The Gillette Company

                                                                             Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                                Nine months     Nine months
Dollars in millions                               ended            ended
                                            September 30, 2004 September 30, 2003   2003       2002       2001       2000       1999
                                             ---------------  ------------------   -----      -----      -----      -----      -----
Earnings:
 Income from continuing operations before
 income taxes                               $          1,801            1,452      1,964      1,752      1,342      1,288      1,912
       Interest expense                                   37               43         54         84        145        223        136
       Interest portion of rental expense                 31               33         41         43         31         25         20
       Amortization of capitalized interest                7                8         10         10          9          6          5

                                                       -----            -----      -----      -----      -----      -----      -----
       Earnings available for fixed charges $          1,876            1,536      2,069      1,889      1,527      1,542      2,073
                                                       =====            =====      =====      =====      =====      =====      =====

Fixed Charges:
       Interest expense                     $             37               43         54         84        145        223        136
       Interest capitalized                                1                1          2          4         11         23         13
       Interest portion of rental expense                 31               33         41         43         31         25         20

                                                       -----            -----      -----      -----      -----      -----      -----
       Total fixed charges                  $             69               77         97        131        187        271        169
                                                       =====            =====      =====      =====      =====      =====      =====



Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                      27.0             20.0       21.4       14.5        8.2        5.7       12.3
                                                       =====            =====      =====      =====      =====      =====      =====

<S><C>
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                               PROSOURCE, INC.
                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
                     FOR THE PERIODS ENDED MARCH 29, 1997
                              AND MARCH 30, 1996
               (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                 (UNAUDITED)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     MARCH 29,       MARCH 30,
                                                       1997            1996
                                                     --------        --------
<S>                                                  <C>             <C>
Net loss applicable to common stock                   $(6,014)       $(19,200)
                                                      =======        ========

Weighted average common shares outstanding              9,347           5,280

Additional shares assuming exercise of stock
 option and warrants                                       --              --
                                                      -------        --------

     Shares used for primary earnings per share         9,347           5,280
                                                      =======        ========
Earnings per share:

     Net earnings (loss)                              $ (0.64)       $  (3.64)
                                                      =======        ========
</TABLE>

Earnings-per-share has been computed using the weighted average number of common
and common equivalent shares outstanding during each period. Common-equivalent
shares (consisting of options and warrants) have been excluded during periods of
net loss since they would be antidilutive.



                                       14
#### Halfmoon Bridge Company, Plaintiff, *v.*The Canal Board et al., Defendants.

(Supreme Court, Albany Special Term,

November, 1912.)

Bridges — trespassing or interfering with highway — injunctions — Barge Canal Act, § 4.

The canal board and its agents will be restrained by injunction from trespassing upon or interfering with a highway bridge over the Mohawk river where it is being enlarged as a part of the barge eanal although said bridge has been lawfully operated as a toll .bridge, unless said board construct as required by statute a new bridge and approaches or appropriate said bridge as prescribed by section 4 of the Barge Canal Act.

Motion for injunction *¡rendente lite.*

Thomas O’Connor (Collin, Wells & Hughes, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Thomas Carmody, attorney-general, Henry S. Bacon, deputy attorney-general, for defendants.

Chester, J.

There appears to be no distinction in-principle between the plaintiff’s application for an injunction in this case and that of the plaintiff in Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. v. Canal Board, 146 App. Div. 151; modified and affirmed in 204 N. Y. 471, where it was held that a railroad company *285was entitled, to a judgment restraining the defendants and their agents from trespassing upon or interfering with a railroad bridge over a stream used for and in the construction and improvement of the barge canal unless either the state constructs a new bridge and approaches thereto or appropriates for the canal the bridge and its approaches in the manner prescribed by the statute. The Barge Canal Act (Laws of 1903, chap. 147) provides in section 3, that “new bridges shall be built over the canals to take the place of existing bridges wherever required or rendered necessary by the new location of the canals.” The case referred to had reference to a railroad bridge. The bridge in question here is a highway bridge over the Mohawk river where that is being enlarged as a part of the barge canal, and it is none the less a highway bridge because the plaintiff has been permitted under the law.to operate it as a toll bridge. The statute mentioned is broad enough to cover bridges of either class.

Under the authority of the case cited, the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction restraining the defendants and their agents from trespassing upon or interfering with its bridge or overflowing the same with water, unless they construct as required by the statute a new bridge and approaches or appropriate the said bridge as well as its approaches in the manner prescribed by section 4 of said chapter 147 of the Laws of 1903.

Motion granted.
Exhibit 99(p)

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Newhall Land and Farming Company for the year ended December 31,
2002, I, Gary M. Cusumano, President and Chief Executive Officer of Newhall Management Corporation (Principal Executive Officer), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|Dated: March 24, 2003 |  | THE NEWHALL LAND AND FARMING COMPANY
(a California Limited Partnership)
Registrant
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |                                                                                   
|                      |  | By:                                                                               
|                      |  |                                                                                   
|                      |  | By:                                                                               
|                      |  |                                                                                   
|                      |  | By:                                                                               

---
# C_2021513EN.01001501.xml

| 20.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 513/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 513/15

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Lennestadt — Germany) — Nemzeti Útdíjfizetési Szolgáltató Zrt. v NW

(Case C-30/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Article 1(1) - Substantive scope - Concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ - Proceedings seeking to recover a charge relating to the use of a toll road)

(2021/C 513/22)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Lennestadt

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Nemzeti Útdíjfizetési Szolgáltató Zrt.

Defendant: NW

Operative part of the order

Article 1(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’, within the meaning of that provision, covers an action to recover, through legal proceedings, a charge relating to the use of a toll road, brought by a company authorised in accordance with the law, which classifies the relationship arising from that usage as being governed by private law.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 26.4.2021.

---
#### Edwin M. NICHOLS, Appellant, v. William BOGERT and Maria Bogert, his wife, Appellees.

No. 69-666.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 27, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 File No. 33-65189, No. 333-03291, No. 333-15665, No. 333-53151 and No.
333-63051) pertaining to the various employee and director stock option plans
and agreements of CT Holdings, Inc. of our report dated April 10, 2001, with
respect to the financial statements of CT Holdings, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB) for the ten months ended December 31, 2000.

                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Dallas, Texas
April 10, 2001
# C_2023063EN.01003801.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — SY v Commission

(Case T-312/21) (1)

(Civil service - Recruitment - Notice of competition - Open Competition EPSO/AD/374/19 - Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the competition reserve list - Action for annulment - Amendment of the notice of competition after a part of the admission tests have been carried out - Lack of legal basis - Legitimate expectations - Legal certainty - Force majeure - Equal treatment - Entitlement to special arrangements - Organisation of the tests remotely - High pass rate of internal candidates - Action for failure to act)

(2023/C 63/47)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: SY (represented by: T. Walberer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Hohenecker, T. Lilamand and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action based on Article 270 TFUE and on Article 91 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, the applicant seeks, in essence, first, the annulment of the addendum to the notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/374/19 (OJ 2020 C 374 A, p. 3), which amended the rules for the tests in that competition on account of the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, of the invitation by the European Commission of 20 November 2020 to sit a test, of the reserve list drawn up at the end of that competition in the field of competition law, of the decisions concerning the recruitment of candidates carried out on the basis of that reserve list and of the review decision of the competition selection board confirming the decision not to include his name on the reserve list. He requests, secondly, in the alternative, that, in the judgment to be delivered, the Court specify the detailed requirements to be complied with by the Commission in order to restore the applicant to the legal position he was in prior to the illegality committed by that selection board, in order to enable the latter to include his name on the reserve list. He requests, thirdly, that the Court find that the Commission infringed Article 265 TFEU by failing to issue a decision in respect of the applicant’s administrative complaint of 17 January 2021.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders SY to bear his own costs and to pay one half of the costs incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders SY to bear his own costs and to pay one half of the costs incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to bear one half of its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to bear one half of its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 310, 2.8.2021.

---
United States Steel Corporation – Keetac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request

April 24, 2012

Item 12

Provide an electronic Excel workbook listing the following information from the NOX

and/or SO2 continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) from the date the

CEMS were installed to present. Provide the information on an hourly basis, where

applicable. The Excel workbook must include the following:

a. CEMS identifying name or marker;

b. CEMS location;

c. Pollutant monitored;

d. Date and time;

e. NOX/ SO2 emissions rate in pounds per million British thermal units

(lb/mmBtu);

f. Raw NOX/ SO2 in ppm;

g. NOX/ SO2 emissions rate in pounds per hour;

h. Flow rate in actual cubic feet per minute (acfm); and 

i. Furnace temperature in °F.

Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or 

were consulted in the preparation of the response: 

Stephani Campbell, Chrissy Bartovich

Answer: 

An Excel spreadsheet is included in this submittal providing the information requested for this 

item with the exception of item (e). As discussed during the April 12, 2012 conference call, 

Keetac does not maintain such records and therefore it has no information that is responsive to 

item (e). In addition, U. S. Steel is providng the response to item (h) in scfm (wet) as that is the 

way the data are kept; and it does not have such data in acfm as requested.
#### Carey BLACKWELL, Appellant, v. Catherine C. BLACKWELL, Appellee.

No. 72-890.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 6, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.