alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          50,088
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  487,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                    29,981
<INVENTORY>                                     28,984
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               558,886
<PP&E>                                       4,137,368
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,290,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,560,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          698,102
<BONDS>                                        766,109
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          585,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,096
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,488
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,560,411
<SALES>                                        355,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               355,971
<CGS>                                          131,124
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  278,696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,537
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,231
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,306
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,306
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### ARCADIA MOTOR CO., Inc., a Florida Corporation, and Michael A. Roberts, Appellants, v. Richard BARNARD, Appellee.

No. 69-693.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 27, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
No. 10654.

#### Leisy, Trustee, *v.*The Ohio Savings & Loan Co.

Decided February 23, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Messrs. Solders, Thayer &*Mansfield, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Tanney & Barber,*for defendant in error.

Judgment modified. Grounds stated in journal entry.

This court finds that the sa-id circuit court was in error in finding and holding that there remained owing upon the mortgage debt due from Thomas Franklin to the defendant in error, The Ohio Savings & Loan Company, at the date of the approval of sale, Majr 13, 1896, a sum in excess of six hundred dollars and in adjudging the amount due on the mortgage assumed by said Ada Franklin (now Webber) the purchaser at said .sale to be the sum of $572.84 as of the date of the rendition of judgment by said circuit court, and in these respects the said judgment should be and is reversed, this court holding that the amount assumed as owing on said mortgage MW 13, 1896, was the sum only of six hundred dollars, and that the amount actually due said defendant in error is said sum of six hundred dollars reduced by the payments made on said indebtedness after the said date, which, reckoning interest at the rate of eight per cent., the court finds to be the sum of $161.14, as of the date of said judgment and decree of the circuit court and the said judgment should be modified so as to conform to this finding and order.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
# C_2020129EN.01001301.xml

| 20.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/13

---

Action brought on 19 February 2020 — Boshab v Council

(Case T-107/20)

(2020/C 129/16)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Évariste Boshab (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/2109 of 9 December 2019, in so far as the applicant’s name is maintained at No 7 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/2109 of 9 December 2019, in so far as the applicant’s name is maintained at No 7 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP;

| — | annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2101 of 9 December 2019, in so far as the applicant’s name is maintained at No 7 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2101 of 9 December 2019, in so far as the applicant’s name is maintained at No 7 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005;

| — | rule that the provisions of Article 3(2)(b) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP and Article 2b(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) [No 1183/2005] are unlawful; |
| --- | --- |

—

rule that the provisions of Article 3(2)(b) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP and Article 2b(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) [No 1183/2005] are unlawful;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-95/20, Kazembe Musonda v Council.

---
Verizon North Inc.



EXHIBIT 12





COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|(Dollars in Millions)                                                                            |  | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2003
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |  | $                                  
|Interest expense                                                                                 |  |                                    
|Portion of rent expense representing interest                                                    |  |                                    
|Amortization of capitalized interest                                                             |  |                                    
|                                                                                                 |  |                                    
|Earnings, as adjusted                                                                            |  | $                                  
|                                                                                                 |  |                                    
|                                                                                                 | 
|Fixed charges:                                                                                   |  |                                    
|Interest expense                                                                                 |  | $                                  
|Portion of rent expense representing interest                                                    |  |                                    
|Capitalized interest                                                                             |  |                                    
|                                                                                                 |  |                                    
|Fixed charges                                                                                    |  | $                                  
|                                                                                                 |  |                                    
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                               |  |                                    
|                                                                                                 |  |
ex_222461.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”), dated as of January 21, 2021, is made to the Employment Agreement (the “Original Agreement”), dated as of March 2, 2015, by and between American National Bankshares Inc., a Virginia corporation, and Hunter Gregg Strader.


 


The parties to the Original Agreement wish to amend the Original Agreement to provide for a term ending December 31, 2021, subject to earlier termination in accordance with the provisions of the Original Agreement, and make such other revisions to the Original Agreement as the parties deem appropriate. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Original Agreement.


 


The parties to the Original Agreement, intending to be legally bound, agree to amend the Original Agreement as follows:


 


1.     Section 1, Employment and Acceptance, is replaced in its entirety with the following:


 


“1.     Employment and Acceptance. You shall be employed as Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Officer of the Company. You shall have the duties and responsibilities that are commensurate with your position as determined and as may be reasonably assigned you from time to time by the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. You hereby accept and agree to such employment and agree to carry-out your duties and responsibilities to the best of your ability in a competent, efficient and businesslike manner. You further agree to comply with all the policies, standards and codes of conduct of the Company now or hereafter adopted.”


 


2.     Section 2, Term, is replaced in its entirety with the following:


“2.     Term. This Agreement is effective as of January 1, 2015 and will expire on December 31, 2021 (the “Employment Period”). For the purposes of this Agreement, the last day of the Employment Period (December 31, 2021) is sometimes referred to as the “Expiration Date” in this Agreement. There will be no renewal of the term of this Agreement unless the Company so elects, and you and the Company thereafter mutually agree in writing by an amendment to this Agreement.”


 


3.     In all other respects, the Original Agreement will remain in full force and effect. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts.


 


 


[Signature page follows]





 










 








 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to the Original Agreement effective as of the date first written above.


 


 


AMERICAN NATIONAL BANKSHARES INC.


 


 


 


By:     /s/ Jeffrey V. Haley_____________________ 


Jeffrey V. Haley


President and Chief Executive Officer


 


 


 


/s/ Hunter Gregg Strader                 


Hunter Gregg Strader
# C_2023155EN.01001101.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — Sdruzhenie ‘Za Zemyata — dostap do pravosadie’, ‘Тhe Green Тank — grazhdansko sdruzhenie s nestopanska tsel’ — Hellenic Republic, NS v Izpalnitelen director na Izpalnitelna agentsia po okolna sreda, ‘TETS Maritsa iztok 2’ EAD

(Case C-375/21, (1) Sdruzhenie ‘Za Zemyata — dostap do pravosadie’ and Others)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Environment - Ambient air quality - Directive 2008/50/EC - Articles 13 and 23 - Limit values for the protection of human health - Exceedance - Air quality plan - Directive 2010/75/EU - Integrated pollution prevention and control - Update of a permit to operate a power plant - Emission limit values - Article 15(4) - Application for a derogation setting less strict emission limit values - Significant pollution - Article 18 - Compliance with environmental quality standards - Obligations of the competent authority)

(2023/C 155/13)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven administrativen sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Sdruzhenie ‘Za Zemyata — dostap do pravosadie’, ‘Тhe Green Тank — grazhdansko sdruzhenie s nestopanska tsel’ — Hellenic Republic, NS

Defendants: Izpalnitelen director na Izpalnitelna agentsia po okolna sreda, ‘TETS Maritsa iztok 2’ EAD

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15(4) of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control), read in conjunction with Article 18 thereof and with Articles 13 and 23 of Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe,

must be interpreted as meaning that when considering a request for a derogation under Article 15(4) of the directive, the competent authority must, taking into account all the relevant scientific data on pollution including the cumulative effect with other sources of the pollutant concerned and the measures under the relevant air quality plan established for a given zone or agglomeration in accordance with Article 23 of Directive 2008/50, refrain from granting such a derogation when that derogation is capable of contributing to exceedance of the air quality standards defined pursuant to Article 13 of Directive 2008/50 or being contrary to the measures included in the plan intended to ensure compliance with those standards and to keep the period of exceedance thereof as short as possible.

---

(1)  OJ C 401, 4.10.2021.

---
#### Rayford HARDISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-619.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 6, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court of Brevard County; Roger F. Dykes, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
257 La. 456

#### Willie HOWARD, Jr. v. PAN AMERICAN FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY.

No. 51035.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 18, 1971.

In re: Willie Howard, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of De-Soto. 240 So.2d 755.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in its judgment.

DIXON, J., takes no part.
Secretary of Natural Resources

TDD (804) 698-4021

www.deq.virginia.gov

Director

(804) 698-4000

1-800-592-5482

SEP 272010

Ms. Diana Esher, DirectorAir Protection Division (3APOO)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Reference:

RECEIVED

SEP 292010

DV1SIO Director (3APOO)

Ambient Air Quality

Standards, Lead, Revision

A09

Dear Ms. Esher:

Pursuant to the requirements of § 110 ofthe Clean Air Act, we are officially requesting

approval of a revision to the Commonwealth of Virginia State Implementation Plan approvedand submitted under the authority of § 10.1-1185 ofthe Code of Virginia and in accordance with

the requirements of 40 CFR Part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of

Implementation Plans).

This revision consists of a regulation (9VAC5 Chapter 30) that contains the ambient air

quality standards set out in 40 CFR Part 50. This action added a lead standard of 1.5 jig/rn 2and

related reference conditions. In addition, the list of appendices to 40 CFR Part 51 was updatedunder documents incorporated by reference, 9VAC5-20-21. The regulation amendments were

adopted by the State Air Pollution Control Board on April 24, 2009 under the authority of § 10.1-

1308 ofthe Code of Virginia.

Enclosed are the following:

1. A true copy of the official regulation (Revision A09) which was published in the

Virginia Register of Regulations on May 25, 2009 after being duly adopted by the

State Air Pollution Control Board on April 24, 2009, certified by the Office ofthe

Attorney General as within the Board’s statutory authority on April 24, 2009, and
3. Public participation record.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please let us know.

Sincely,

David K. Paylor

DKP\kgsTEMPLATES\SIP-REG\RE000

SIP\NONATTN AREAS\20 1 O\A09-SIP.DOC

Enclosures
# C_2022171EN.01003701.xml

| 25.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/37

---

Order of the General Court of 15 February 2022 — eSlovensko Bratislava v Commission

(Case T-304/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Financial provisions - EU programme on promoting safer use of the internet - Designation of the defendant - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 171/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: eSlovensko Bratislava (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented by: B. Fridrich, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà and S. Romoli, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision Ares(2021) 1953853 of 30 March 2021 to terminate the grant agreement concluded with the applicant concerning project 2015 SK IA 0038 (‘Slovak Safer Internet Centre IV’).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | eSlovensko Bratislava is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

eSlovensko Bratislava is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.

---
#### Raymond Eugene ADAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-135.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 28, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[ARTICLE] 5
[LEGEND]
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in real estate, and real
estate joint ventures.  In accordance with industry practice, its balance 
sheet is unclassified.  For full information, refer to the accompanying 
audited financial statements.

<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                  12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          OCT-31-1997
[PERIOD-END]                               OCT-31-1997
[CASH]                                       1,741,456
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                1,119,938
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                     0
[PP&E]                                               0
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                              40,963,845<F1>
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                                0
[BONDS]                                              0
[COMMON]                                             0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[OTHER-SE]                                  39,850,299<F2>
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                40,963,845<F3>
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                            29,219,973<F4>
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                            10,198,844
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0  
[INCOME-PRETAX]                             19,021,129
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                         19,021,129
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                19,021,129
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                   105.21<F5>
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net investments
in real estate of $21,165,553, real estate held for sale of $13,506,748,
investment in joint venture of $2,572,800, net deferred expenses of
$628,834 and other assets of $228,516.
<F2>Other Stockholders' Equity represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and accrued liabilities of 
$940,489 and other liabilities of $173,057.
<F4>Total revenue includes rent of $11,331,966, gains on sales of real estate
of $17,232,823, equity in earnings of joint venture of $209,663, and interest
and other revenues of $445,521.
<F5>Represents net income per Unit of limited partnership interest.
</FN>
</TABLE>
STATE OF DELAWARE
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE



I, EDWARD J. FREEL, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
AMENDMENT OF "CENTRAL ILLINOIS FINANCIAL CO., INC.", CHANGING ITS NAME FROM
"CENTRAL ILLINOIS FINANCIAL CO., INC." TO "BANKILLINOIS FINANCIAL
CORPORATION", FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE TWENTY-SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY,
A.D. 1998, AT 9 O'CLOCK A.M.




/s/EDWARD J. FREEL
EDWARD J. FREEL, SECRETARY OF STATE

AUTHENTICATION:  8962018
DATE: 03/01/98
Page 1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
<PAGE>
                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                    OF THE
                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                     CENTRAL ILLINOIS FINANCIAL CO. INC.


          Central Illinois Financial Co., Inc. (hereinafter called the
"Corporation"), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as amended (the
"DGCL"), does hereby certify that:

          1.   The name of the Corporation is: Central Illinois Financial
Co., Inc.

          2.   The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby
amended by striking out Article I thereof and by substituting in lieu of said
Article the following new Article I:

                                   ARTICLE I

          The name of the Corporation is: BankIllinois Financial Corporation.

          3.   The amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation herein
certified has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Sections
228 and 242 of the DGCL.

Dated as of the 27th day of February, 1998.




CENTRAL ILLINOIS FINANCIAL CO., INC.



/S/Van A. Dukeman
Van A. Dukeman, President
# C_2023071EN.01002902.xml

| 27.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/29

---

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2022 — Steinbach International v Commission

(Case T-566/21) (1)

(Action for annulment - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff and statistical nomenclature - Classification in the Combined Nomenclature - Tariff heading - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2023/C 71/39)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Steinbach International GmbH (Schwertberg, Austria) (represented by: J. Gesinn, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Salyková and L. Mantl, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/957 of 31 May 2021 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2021 L 211, p. 48).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Steinbach International GmbH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Steinbach International GmbH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 490, 6.12.2021.

---
#### CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, Appellant, v. Robert C. CANTWELL, III, Appellee.

No. 72-37.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 6, 1972.

Rehearing Denied July 7, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.