alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### I-T-E Imperial Corporation, Appellant, *v.*Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellee.

Argued January 6, 1975,

before President Judge Bowman and Judges Crumlish, Jr., Kramer, Wilkinson, Jr., Mencer, Rogers and Blatt.

*551
      *Frank A. Sinon,*with him *Dean A. Weidner,*and *Rhoads, Sinon & Reader,*for appellant.

*Vincent J. Dopko,*Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

June 6, 1975:

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

This case is companion to *Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Commonwealth,*19 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 523, 339 A.2d 912 (1975).

I-T-E Imperial Corporation, a Delaware corporation, has appealed from the settlement of its foreign excise tax for the year ending December 31, 1968. It contends that the “Foreign Excise Tax Act,” Act of July 25, 1953, P.L. 560,1
      *as amended,*72 P.S. 1861 et seq., when compared to the “Domestic Excise Tax Act,” Act of July 25, 1953, P.L. 564,2
      *as amended,*72 P.S. 1827.2, demonstrates discrimination against it and other foreign corporations in violation of Article 8, Section 1 (the uniformity clause) of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. I-T-E is represented by the *552same counsel as represented the taxpayer in *Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Commonwealth, supra,*and its mentioned attacks on the Act of July 25, 1958, P.L. 560 are identical to those made upon the Excise Tax on Foreign Corporations of the Tax Reform Code of 1971, Act of March 4, 1971, P.L. 6, Article X, §§ 8001-8006 (Supp. 1974-1975), which replaced the “Foreign Excise Tax Act” without change pertinent to our considerations here.

For the reasons fully explored in *Columbia, supra,*we reject the appellant’s contentions and enter the following:

Order

And now, this 6th day of June, 1975, the appeal of I-T-E Imperial Corporation is dismissed and the settlement appealed from is approved; unless exceptions are filed within thirty days of the filing of this order, the Chief Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Commonwealth in the amount of $123,821.53, and to mark the same satisfied as to the amount of $123,736 previously paid by the appellant.

. Repealed by Section 1005 of the Tax Reform Code of 1971, 72 P.S. §8005 (Supp. 1974-1975).

. Repealed by Section 8 of the Act of July 12, 1972, P.L. 769, 1972, Purdon’s Legislative Service, Issue No. 2, pages 458, 461.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JEFFREY HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 557 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JEFFREY HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 558 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
258 La. 556

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Ennis BENNETT v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 51362.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 26, 1971.

In re: Ennis Bennett applying for writs of habeas corpus, mandamus and certiorari.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the relief sought.
[No. 440-3.

Division Three.

March 28, 1972.]

#### Virginia Coble, *Respondent,*v. Cecilia Gonzales, *Appellant.*
Exhibit 99.3


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Avery  Communications,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q/A for the period  ending  September  30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Patrick J. Haynes,  III,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Patrick J. Haynes, III
--------------------------
Patrick J. Haynes, III
Chief Executive Officer
December 16, 2002


<PAGE>
# C_2023338EN.01001701.xml

| 25.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — SMA Mineral v Commission

(Case T-215/21) (1)

(Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - System for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances - Installation using an intermediate product covered by a product benchmark - Rejection of data relating to the free allocation of allowances concerning that installation - Manifest errors of assessment)

(2023/C 338/21)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: SMA Mineral AB (Filipstad, Sweden) (represented by: E. Larsson, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Wils, B. De Meester and P. Carlin, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Article 1(2) of Commission Decision (EU) 2021/355 of 25 February 2021 concerning national implementation measures for the transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances in accordance with Article 11(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2021 L 68, p. 221).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 297, 26.7.2021.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1244 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1244

To extend the temporary suspension of the duty on 3,4-diaminophenetole 
                          dihydrogen sulfate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 15 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

  Mr. Chafee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of the duty on 3,4-diaminophenetole 
                          dihydrogen sulfate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3,4-DIAMINOPHENETOLE DIHYDROGEN SULFATE.

    Heading 9902.29.45 of subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/
92'' and inserting ``12/31/94''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by this Act applies with 
respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
    (b) Reliquidation.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act 
of 1930 or any other provision of law, upon proper request filed with 
the appropriate customs officer on or before the 90th day after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, any entry of an article described in 
subheading 9902.29.45 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992, and
            (2) before the date which is 15 days after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry occurred on or 
after the date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### GALAXIE HOMES OF TAMPA, INC. v. GIFFORD.

No. 38842.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 223 So.2d 108.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HARBINGER CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEP-30-1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  ALL AMOUNTS HAVE BEEN RETROACTIVELY RESTATED
TO REFLECT A THREE-FOR-TWO STOCK SPLIT IN THE FORM OF A STOCK DIVIDEND PAID ON
MAY 15, 1998 AND A DISCONTINUED OPERATION EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          52,156
<SECURITIES>                                    48,410
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,724
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               143,726
<PP&E>                                          41,769
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 183,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,023
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,281
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   183,308
<SALES>                                         34,772
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,650
<CGS>                                            3,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                88,353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  64
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,932)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       705
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (14,637)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (8,185)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,822)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.55)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                        -------------------------------
                                        





THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ANALYTICAL SURVEYS, INC.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 33-
24142, No. 33-33948, No. 33-53950 and No. 33-59940) on Form S-8 of Analytical
Surveys, Inc. of our report dated October 31, 1997, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Analytical Surveys, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30,
1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended September 30, 1997, which report appears in the September 30, 1997
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Analytical Surveys, Inc.



                              KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


Denver, Colorado
December 24, 1997
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on May 30, 2018, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute—Cooperative Research Group on Mechanical Stratigraphy and Natural Deformation in the Permian Strata of Texas and New Mexico: Implications for Exploitation of the Permian Basin (“Permian Basin”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, CONOCOPHILLIPS Company, Houston, TX, has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Permian Basin intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 18, 2017, Permian Basin filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 12, 2017 (82 FR 22159).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 9, 2018. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 25, 2018 (83 FR 24347).                

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2018-14572 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
# Official Journal C 138A/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 138A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4913 June 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 138A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4913 June 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2006/C 138A/1 | | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2006/C 138A/1

1

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2006/C 138A/2 | Corrigendum to Notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/38/05 to constitute a reserve of English language linguistic administrators (AD 5) in the field of translation (
  Official Journal of the European Union C 290 A of 23 November 2005
  ) | 3 |

Corrigenda

2006/C 138A/2

Corrigendum to Notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/38/05 to constitute a reserve of English language linguistic administrators (AD 5) in the field of translation (
  Official Journal of the European Union C 290 A of 23 November 2005
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 290 A of 23 November 2005

3

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

13.6.2006

| 13.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 138/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 138/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---

Corrigenda

| 13.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 138/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 138/3

---

Corrigendum to Notice of Open Competition EPSO/AD/38/05 to constitute a reserve of English language linguistic administrators (AD 5) in the field of translation

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 290 A of 23 November 2005
  )

(2006/C 138 A/01)

On page 6, section B, third paragraph of point 1, Admission tests — marking:

for:

‘For all admission tests, the 120 candidates (2) with the highest combined marks for the tests (and a pass-mark in each) will be invited to submit a full application with a view to possible admission to the following stage of the competition.’,

read:

read

“For all admission tests, the 240 candidates (2) with the highest combined marks for the tests (and a pass-mark in each) will be invited to submit a full application with a view to possible admission to the following stage of the competition.’

---
#### James Murtha, Respondent, v Diane Kalhorn, Appellant.

[656 NYS2d 905]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.), dated June 12, 1996, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff met his burden of demonstrating the existence of factual issues with respect to whether he suffered a "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The medical reports from the plaintiff’s treating physicians and the more recent report submitted by the plaintiff’s treating *497chiropractor present objective quantified evidence of the extent or degree of limitation with respect to the use of the plaintiff s dorso-lumbar spine and the duration of the limitation *(see, Bates v Peeples,*171 AD2d 635; *Swenning v Wankel,*140 AD2d 428). Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.
#### Thelma EPPS v. B. J. BUZBEE, doing business as Heavy Haulers, et al.

No. 53289.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 20, 1973.

In re: Thelma Epps applying for Cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 271 So.2d 543.

Writ denied. Under facts found by the court of appeal, the result is correct.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.1
 
  
  Parent US Borrower UK Borrower GMAC Administrative Agent Loan Party Loan Parties Lender Lenders Ableco Collateral Agent Agent Agents Loan Agreement
 Monthly Financial Deliverable Monthly Financial Deliverable Deadline Section 7.01(a)(iii) Designated Monthly Financial Deliverable Requirement Blocked Account Deliverable Deliverables Blocked Account Deliverable
Deadline Delivery Deadlines Section 8.01(a) Designated Blocked Account Deliverable Requirement Designated Events of Default




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



Very truly yours,ABLECO FINANCE LLC,
as Collateral Agent, and on behalf of itself, and its
affiliate assigns, as LendersBy:
    
    /s/ Daniel E. WolfTitle:
    
    PresidentGMAC COMMERCIAL FINANCE LLC, as Administrative
Agent and as a LenderBy:Title:




---



##### 



Very truly yours,ABLECO FINANCE LLC,
as Collateral Agent, and on behalf of itself, and its
affiliate assigns, as LendersBy:Title:GMAC COMMERCIAL FINANCE LLC, as Administrative
Agent and as a LenderBy:
    
    /s/ Christopher GauchTitle:
    
    Senior Managing Director




---



##### 



FORTRESS CREDIT FUNDING I LP, as a LenderBy:
    
    Fortress Credit Funding I GP LLC, its general partnerBy:
    
    /s/ Constantine DakoliasTitle:
    
    CHIEF CREDIT OFFICERFORTRESS CREDIT FUNDING II LP,
as a LenderBy:
    
    Fortress Credit Funding II GP LLC, its general partnerBy:
    
    /s/ Constantine DakoliasTitle:
    
    CHIEF CREDIT OFFICERFORTRESS CREDIT FUNDING
III LP, as a LenderBy:
    
    Fortress Credit Funding III GP LLC, its general partnerBy:
    
    /s/ Constantine DakoliasTitle:
    
    CHIEF CREDIT OFFICERFORTRESS CREDIT FUNDING
IV LP, as a LenderBy:
    
    Fortress Credit Funding IV GP LLC, its general partnerBy:
    
    /s/ Constantine DakoliasTitle:
    
    CHIEF CREDIT OFFICER




---



##### 



FORTRESS CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES I LP, as a LenderBy:
    
    Fortress Credit Opportunities I GP LLC,its general partnerBy:
    
    /s/ Constantine DakoliasTitle:
    
    CHIEF CREDIT OFFICERFORTRESS CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES II LP, as a LenderBy:
    
    Fortress Credit Oportunities II GP LLC,its general partnerBy:
    
    /s/ Constantine DakoliasTitle:
    
    CHIEF CREDIT OFFICERFCCD LIMITED, as a LenderBy:
    
    /s/ Constantine DakoliasTitle:
    
    CHIEF CREDIT OFFICER




---



##### 



ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO BY:LOUD TECHNOLOGIES INC., as US BorrowerBy:
    
    /s/ Timothy P. ONeilTitle:
    
    CFOGRACE ACQUISITIONCO LIMITED,
 as UK BorrowerBy:
    
    /s/ Timothy P. ONeilTitle:
    
    VP-DirectorLOUD TECHNOLOGIES EUROPE PLC, as a Foreign GuarantorBy:
    
    /s/ James T. EngenTitle:
    
    DirectorMACKIE DESIGNS INC., as a US GuarantorBy:
    
    /s/ Timothy P. ONeilTitle:
    
    VPSIA SOFTWARE COMPANY, INC.,
as a US GuarantorBy:
    
    /s/ Timothy P. ONeilTitle:
    
    VP




---



##### 



SLM HOLDING CORP.,
as a US GuarantorBy:
    
    /s/ Timothy P. ONeilTitle:
    
    VPST. LOUIS MUSIC, INC., 
as a US GuarantorBy:
    
    /s/ Timothy P. ONeilTitle:
    
    VP
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1037 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1037

 To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1991 with respect to the application 
                              of such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 27 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

  Mrs. Murray introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1991 with respect to the application 
                              of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice for Wards Cove Workers 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 402 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (42 U.S.C. 1981 note) 
is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``(a) In General.--''; 
        and
            (2) by striking subsection (b).

SEC. 3. APPLICATION AND CONSTRUCTION.

    (a) Application.--For purposes of determining the application of 
the amendments made by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, such amendments 
shall apply to a case that was subject to section 402(b) of the Civil 
Rights Act of 1991 (as in effect on the day before the date of 
enactment of this Act) in the same manner and to the same extent as 
such amendments apply to any case brought under title VII of the Civil 
Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.) that was not subject to 
section 402(b) of the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
    (b) Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to alter, 
or shall be considered to be evidence of, congressional intent 
regarding the application of such amendments to any case that was not 
subject to section 402(b) of the Civil Rights Act of 1991.

                                 <all>
```