Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2019
                              Dhiraj Kotwal, M.D., ALJ Ruling 2020-4 (HHS CRD Nov. 13, 2019)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Dhiraj Kotwal, M.D., ALJ Ruling 2020-4 (HHS CRD Nov. 13, 2019)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Dhiraj Kotwal, M.D.
	(NPI: 1205918851; PTAN: 538034)
	Petitioner,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-17-630Ruling No. 2020-4November 13, 2019

        
              
    

      DISMISSAL
Petitioner, Dhiraj Kotwal, M.D., challenges the effective date of his participation in the Medicare program.  However, the Medicare contractor dismissed, as untimely, his request for reconsideration.  Petitioner then requested this review.  The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) moves to dismiss, arguing that Petitioner has no right to further review because he did not obtain a reconsidered determination.
Although the contractor obviously misunderstands the regulations governing the timeliness of appeals and may have improperly dismissed Petitioner’s request, I have no choice but to grant CMS’s motion and dismiss this case pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 498.70(b).
Background
Petitioner Kotwal is a Texas physician, specializing in infectious diseases.  CMS Ex. 1; P. Ex. 1.  He applied for enrollment in the Medicare program, and, in a letter dated November 4, 2016, the Medicare contractor, Novitas Solutions, Inc., advised him that his enrollment application had been approved with an effective date of August 28, 2016.
Page 2
The notice also advised that, if he disagreed with the established effective date, he could request reconsideration before a contractor hearing officer.  CMS Ex. 4.
The notice incorrectly advised Petitioner that his request had to be submitted “within 60 calendar days of the postmark date of this letter.”  CMS Ex. 4 at 3.  In fact, the regulations that govern reconsideration provide that the request must be filed “[w]ithin 60 days from *receipt of the notice* of initial determination.”  42 C.F.R. § 498.22(b)(3) (emphasis added).  The date of receipt is presumed to be five days after the date on the notice unless there is a showing that it was, in fact, received earlier or later.  The regulations also require CMS to extend the time for filing if the affected party shows good cause for missing the deadline.  42 C.F.R. § 498.22(d)(2).  Here, the contractor’s notice letter says nothing about the Petitioner’s right to request an extension of time.1
CMS also seems to be under the misapprehension that the date of filing is the date the contractor receives the request.  While this is true of enrollment applications, the rules for requesting review under section 498 differ.  The Departmental Appeals Board has long maintained that appeals filed pursuant to the section 498 regulations are deemed filed when they are mailed.  *Riverview Village*, DAB No. 1840 (2002).
Petitioner’s request for reconsideration is dated November 21, 2016.  It appears that Petitioner submitted it three times, and that the first of these may have been filed timely.  CMS Ex. 5 at 5 (“Second Attempt”); CMS Ex. 5 at 19 (“Third Attempt”); *see* CMS Ex. 5 at 9, 23; P. Ex. 1 at 2 (Kotwal Decl. ¶ 10); P. Ex. 3 at 3, 7 (showing mailing date of December 23, 2016, within the 60-day deadline); P. Ex. 10 (showing delivery date of December 24, 2016, signed by G. Welsh).
In any event, on March 3, 2017, the contractor dismissed Petitioner’s request for reconsideration because it was not filed within “the designated timeframe.”  CMS Ex. 7.
Discussion
To receive Medicare payments for services furnished to program beneficiaries, a Medicare supplier must be enrolled in the Medicare program.  42 C.F.R. § 424.505.  To enroll in Medicare, a prospective supplier must complete and submit an enrollment application.  42 C.F.R. §§ 424.510(d)(1), 424.515(a).  When CMS determines that a supplier meets the applicable enrollment requirements, it grants him Medicare billing privileges.  For physicians, the effective date for billing privileges “is the *later* of the date of filing” a subsequently-approved enrollment application or “[t]he date that the supplier first began furnishing services at a new practice location.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.520(d) (emphasis added).
Page 3
CMS’s determination as to the effective date of enrollment is an “initial determination” that is subject to review under the procedures set forth in 42 C.F.R. Part 498.  42 C.F.R. § 498.3(a)(1), (b)(15).  A supplier or prospective supplier dissatisfied with an initial determination may request reconsideration by filing a written request within 60 days from receipt of the notice of the initial determination.  42 C.F.R. §§ 498.5(d)(1), (*l*)(1), 498.22.  If CMS (or its contractor) receives a properly-filed request for reconsideration, it makes a reconsidered determination affirming or modifying the initial determination.  42 C.F.R. § 498.24(c).  A supplier or prospective supplier dissatisfied with a reconsidered determination is entitled to a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ).  42 C.F.R. §§ 498.5(d)(2), (*l*)(2), 498.40.
The regulations do not provide for a hearing in the absence of a reconsidered determination, even though this “may in certain situations be unfair.”  *Ramaswamy v. Burwell*, 83 F. Supp.3d 846, 854 (E.D. Mo. 2015); *Rollington Ferguson, M.D.*, DAB No. 2949 (2019); *Denise A. Hardy*, *D.P.M.*, DAB No. 2464 at 4-5 (2012); *Hiva Vakil*, *M.D.*, DAB No. 2460 at 4-5 (2012).2
Conclusion
Because neither CMS nor its contractor issued a reconsidered determination, Petitioner does not have a right to an ALJ hearing.  I therefore dismiss his hearing request pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 498.70(b).


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. I urge CMS to amend its misleading notice letters so that they accurately reflect the regulations. back to note 1
                      2.  But this issue is ultimately not settled.  In a Social Security appeal brought pursuant to section 405(g) of the Social Security Act, the Supreme Court recently determined that the Appeals Council’s dismissal of a request for review is a “final decision . . . made after a hearing” and thus subject to federal court review.  The Supreme Court explicitly left open the question of whether a federal court may review dismissals made at the lower levels of the administrative review process.  Smith v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1765 at 1777 n.17 (2019).  In arguing that such a dismissal is not reviewable, an agency advocate might prefer a less disturbing set of facts than those presented here.  back to note 2 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back