alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
House Calendar No. 218

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 532

[Report No. 103–730]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4448)

Historical Park, and for other purposes.to amend the Act establishing Lowell National

SEPTEMBER 20, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 218

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 532

[Report No. 103–730]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4448) to amend the Act

establishing Lowell National Historical Park, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 20, 1994

Mr. MOAKLEY, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4448) to amend

the Act establishing Lowell National Historical Park,

and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of

3 rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 4448) to amend the Act establishing

6 Lowell National Historical Park, and for other purposes.

7 The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Gen-
2

HRES 532 RH

1 eral debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not ex2 ceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair3 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on

4 Natural Resources. After general debate the bill shall be

5 considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It

6 shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the

7 purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the

8 amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by

9 the Committee on Natural Resources now printed in the

10 bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a sub11 stitute shall be considered as read. Points of order against

12 the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute

13 for failure to comply with clause 5(a) of rule XXI are

14 waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for

15 amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

16 to the House with such amendments as may have been

17 adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the

18 House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

19 the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in

20 the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be

21 considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto

22 to final passage without intervening motion except one

23 motion to recommit with or without instructions.
No. 10739.

#### Burns *v.*Burns.

Decided March 2, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Mr. Charles L. Darlington,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Charles W. Baker,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Si-iauck and Price, JJ., concur.
#### ROBERT D. VAN BUSKIRK, INC., and Morris J. Watsky, Appellants, v. SOUTHERN AMERICAN FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 71-993.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 17, 1973.

Rehearing Denied *June*25, 1973.

Burton E. Burdick, of Burdick & Dona-hoe, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant-Robert D. Van Buskirk, Inc.

Theodore Klein, of Fine, Jacobson, Block & Semet, Miami, for appellant-Morris J. Watsky.

John L. Hartnett of the Law Offices of John L. Hartnett, Miami, for appellee-Southern American Fire Ins. Co.

Leon Nichols, of Lane, French, Lane, Carrier & Nichols, Miami, for appellee-Cambridge Mutual Fire Ins. Co.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by Van Buskirk, plaintiff below, and Watsky, defendant and third party plaintiff below, from a final judgment entered in their favor and against Southern American Fire Insurance Company, defendant, and Cambridge Mutual-Fire Insurance Company, third party defendant. The sole point involved is the trial court’s denial of Van Buskirk’s and Watsky’s claim for attorney’s fees under Section 627.0127, F.S. (now Section 627.-428, F.S.1971, F.S.A.).

The trial court’s denial of attorney’s fees was predicated upon the prevailing decision in Southern American F. Ins. Co. v. All Ways Rel. Bldg. Main., Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 11, construing the application of Section 627.0127. Subsequent to the entry of the final judgment and during the pend-*214ency of this appeal the Supreme Court of Florida quashed the aforementioned decision and reinstated the award of attorney’s fees. All Ways Reliable Building Maintenance, Inc. v. Moore, Fla.1972, 261 So.2d 131. Based upon our review of the facts in the case sub judice we are of the opinion that the decision in All Ways Reliable Building Maintenance, Inc. v. Moore, supra, is controlling with respect to the appellants’ entitlement to attorney’s fees.1

Accordingly, that portion of the final judgment relating to attorney’s fees is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

REED, C. J., OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

1

. A recital of the facts is unnecessary to the disposition of this appeal. We would observe, however, that AVatsky as a named beneficiary under a policy of insurance issued by Southern is entitled to recover attorney’s fees under the clear language of Section G27.0127 irrespective of the decision of the Supreme Court in All Ways Reliable Building Maintenance, Inc. v. Moore, Fla.1972, 261 So.2d 131.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Kinetics Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry M. Heimendinger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/    LARRY M. HEIMENDINGERLarry M. HeimendingerChief Executive OfficerOctober 15, 2003




23
#### William MARR, Appellant, v. Anita ANGELO, Appellee.

No. 72-13.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 15 — Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial InformationTo the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Goodrich CorporationWe are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements and intheir related Prospectuses, of our report dated August 2, 2006 relating to the Unaudited CondensedConsolidated Interim Financial Statements of Goodrich Corporation that are included in its Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006:     **Registration**    **Number** **Description of Registration Statement** **Filing Date**33-49052 The B.F.Goodrich Company Key Employees’ Stock Option Plan — Form S-8 June 26, 1992     333-03293 The B.F.Goodrich Company Stock Option Plan — Form S-8 May 8, 1996     333-19697 The B.F.Goodrich Company Savings Benefit Restoration Plan — Form S-8 January 13, 1997     333-53879 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan — Form S-8 May 29, 1998     333-53881 Rohr, Inc. 1982 Stock Option Plan, Rohr, Inc. 1989 Stock Incentive Plan andRohr, Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive Plan — Form S-8 May 29, 1998     333-76297 Coltec Industries Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan and Coltec Industries Inc. 1994Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors — Form S-8 April 14, 1999     333-77023 The B.F.Goodrich Company Stock Option Plan and Goodrich Corporation 2001 EquityCompensation Plan — Form S-8 April 26, 1999     333-60210 Goodrich Corporation Stock Option Plan — Form S-8 May 4, 2001     333-60208 Goodrich Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan — Form S-8 May 4, 2001     333-98165 Shelf Registration for Debt Securities, Series Preferred Stock, Common Stock,Stock Purchase Contracts and Stock Purchase Units — Form S-3 August 15, 2002     333-107866 Goodrich Corporation Employees’ Savings Plan — Form S-8 August 12, 2003     333-107867 Goodrich Corporation Wage Employees’ Savings Plan — Form S-8 August 12, 2003     333-107868 Goodrich Corporation Savings Plan for Rohr Employees — Form S-8 August 12, 2003     333-109247 Goodrich Corporation Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan — Form S-8 September 29, 2003     333-123721 Goodrich Corporation Outside Director Deferral Plan — Form S-8 March 31, 2005     333-124244 Goodrich Corporation 2001 Equity Compensation Plan — Form S-8 April 22, 2005/s/ Ernst & Young LLPCharlotte, North Carolina
H. Res. 433

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

May 24, 1994.

Resolved, That during consideration of the bill (H.R.

4453) making appropriations for military construction for the

Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September

30, 1995, and for other purposes, all points of order against

provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 or

6 of rule XXI are waived.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### DECATUR NEWS, INC., a corporation v. The CITY OF NEW ORLEANS.

No. 54238.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 17, 1973.

In re: Decatur News, Inc. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order.

Writ denied. No showing has been made to justify the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction in view of the provisions of Article 7, Section 94, La. Constitution.

TATE, J., absent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BONTEX,
INC.'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AS SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON 
FORM 10-Q, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                 475
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       11,126
<ALLOWANCES>                                           285
<INVENTORY>                                          7,059
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    19,546
<PP&E>                                              24,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                      12,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      32,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               18,802
<BONDS>                                              2,329
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  157
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                          10,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        32,654
<SALES>                                              8,717
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     8,718
<CGS>                                                6,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        8,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        35
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        10
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     243
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (476)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (96)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (380)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (380)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.24)
        


</TABLE>
----

----

|                                                 | Jurisdiction of | Status at     |
|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|---------------|
| Name                                                 | Incorporation   | June 28, 2009 |
| Magnetek, Inc.                                       | Delaware        | Active        |
| Magnetek Mondel Holding, Inc. (1)                    | Delaware        | Active        |
| Magnetek Alternative Energy, Inc. (1)                | Delaware        | Active        |
| Magnetek (U.K.) Limited (1)                          | England         | Active        |
| Mondel ULC (3)                                       | Canada          | Active        |
| Magnetek National Electric Coil, Inc. (1)            | Delaware        | Inactive      |
| Magnetek de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (2)                 | Mexico          | Inactive      |
| Manufacturas Electricas de Reynosa, S.A. de C.V. (2) | Mexico          | Inactive      |
| Mejor Electronica de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (2)         | Mexico          | Inactive      |
| Servicio de Guarderas, S.C. (2)                      | Mexico          | Inactive      |

| (1)   | 100% owned by Magnetek, Inc. |
|-----------------|------------------------------|

| (2)   | 99% owned by Magnetek, Inc. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------|

| (3)   | 100% owned by Magnetek Mondel Holding, Inc. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------|

----

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996  
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1997  
<CASH>                                            51,378  
<SECURITIES>                                           0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                    236,261  
<ALLOWANCES>                                      19,496  
<INVENTORY>                                       14,865  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 321,061  
<PP&E>                                         3,261,462  
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,056,369  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,613,365  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            347,209  
<BONDS>                                          697,309  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            448,000  
<PREFERRED>                                            0  
<COMMON>                                               0  
<OTHER-SE>                                      (27,887)  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,613,365  
<SALES>                                          263,749  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 263,749  
<CGS>                                             89,331  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    180,613  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                13,497  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   74,740  
<INCOME-TAX>                                      26,673  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               48,067  
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0  
<CHANGES>                                              0  
<NET-INCOME>                                      48,067  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0  
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 32119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL18-173-000]


Notice of Institution of Section 206 Proceeding and Refund 
Effective Date

Monongahela Power Company
Potomac Edison Company
West Penn Power Company
AEP Indiana Michigan Transmission Company, Inc.
AEP Kentucky Transmission Company, Inc.
AEP Ohio Transmission Company, Inc.
AEP West Virginia Transmission Company, Inc.
Appalachian Power Company
Indiana Michigan Power Company
Kentucky Power Company
Kingsport Power Company
Ohio Power Company
Wheeling Power Company
Commonwealth Edison Company
Commonwealth Edison Company of Indiana, Inc.
Dayton Power and Light Company
Virginia Electric and Power Company
Public Service Electric and Gas Company
PECO Energy Company
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
Baltimore Gas and Electric Company
Jersey Central Power & Light Company
Potomac Electric Power Company
Atlantic City Electric Company
Delmarva Power & Light Company
UGI Utilities Inc.
Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc.
CED Rock Springs, LLC
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative
Rockland Electric Company
Duquesne Light Company
Neptune Regional Transmission System, LLC
Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company
Linden VFT, LLC
American Transmission Systems, Incorporated
City of Cleveland, Department of Public Utilities, Division of 
Cleveland Public Power
Duke Energy Ohio, Inc.
Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc.
City of Hamilton, OH
Hudson Transmission Partners, LLC
East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc.
City of Rochelle
ITC Interconnection LLC
Mid-Atlantic Interstate Transmission, LLC
Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Ohio Valley Electric Corporation

    On July 2, 2018, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. EL18-
173-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 
U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation to require the above-
captioned PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Transmission Owners to refile 
Schedule 12 of the PJM Tariff to clearly specify its Open Access 
Transmission Tariff or show cause why Schedule 12 should not be 
revised. Monongahela Power Company, et al., 164 FERC ] 61,002 (2018).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL18-173-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL18-173-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21 
days of the date of issuance of the order.

    Dated: July 2, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14771 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 45

Providing that the House of Representatives should defeat any legislation

designed to stimulate the economy during fiscal year 1993 or 1994

if that legislation would also increase the size of the annual budget

deficit for that year.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. GILLMOR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Operations

RESOLUTION

Providing that the House of Representatives should defeat

any legislation designed to stimulate the economy during

fiscal year 1993 or 1994 if that legislation would also

increase the size of the annual budget deficit for that

year.

Whereas the new Administration has not stated whether the

budget submission to Congress for fiscal year 1994 will

increase or decrease the size of the annual budget deficit;

Whereas the fiscal year 1992 budget deficit was

$290,000,000,000, the largest budget deficit in our history;

Whereas interest payments on the public debt are currently

the third largest item in the annual Federal budget, con-
2

•HRES 45 IH

suming over $200,000,000,000 each year at the expense

of other more important national priorities;

Whereas the ballooning public debt currently exceeds

$4,000,000,000,000; and

Whereas any short-term economic gain arising from new deficit spending in fiscal year 1993 or 1994 is not worth the

additional long-term debt burden that would be handed

down to our children: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that any legislation which would provide a

3 short-term economic stimulus to the economy, but would

4 also increase the size of the fiscal year 1993 or 1994

5 budget deficit, should not be enacted into law.

Æ
# C_2021263EN.01000601.xml

| 5.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Ilfov (Romania) lodged on 26 March 2021 — SR v EW

(Case C-196/21)

(2021/C 263/08)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Ilfov

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant-applicant: SR

Appellant-defendant: EW

Interveners: FB, CX, IK

Question referred

Where a court decides to summon interveners in civil proceedings, is the ‘applicant’, within the meaning of Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007, (1) the court in the Member State which decides to summon the interveners or the litigant in the proceedings pending before that court?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents), and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 (OJ 2007 L 324, p. 79).

---