alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MALLOW HOTEL CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Andrew J. SARDONI et al., Trustees, etc.

No. 6378.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

March 15, 1937.

Frank P. Slattery, of Wilkes-Barre, Pa., for appellant.

James P. Harris and Neil Chrisman, both of Wilkes-Barre, Pa., Arthur Butler Graham, of New York City, and R. J. Doran, of Wilkes-Barre, Pa., for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS, and BIGGS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

After argument and full consideration had, this appeal is dismissed and the order of Judge Johnson, which reads as follows: ^ * * It is ordered that the proceedings for the reorganization of the Mallow Hotel Corporation filed to No. 9287 In Bankruptcy in this Court, and the proceedings for the reorganization of the Wilkes-Barre Hotel Company filed to No. 9476 In Bankruptcy in this Court, be and the same are hereby consolidated for the purpose of effecting a reorganization of the Mallow Hotel Corporation, Debtor, and the Wilkes-Barre Hotel Company, Debtor, under the proposed joint reorganization, * * * ” is affirmed.
#### Pansy CRAINE, Appellant, v. George BETHY and Ruby Reynolds, Appellees.

No. 70-448.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 27, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**PCMALL, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**(ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of PC Mall, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Frank F. Khulusi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as ofthe date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2)  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods indicated.

 

This Certification has not been, and shall not bedeemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

March 16, 2010

 
| /s/ Frank F. Khulusi    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Frank F. Khulusi        |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
#### Alfred Connizzo et al., Appellants, v K-Mart Corporation, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[736 NYS2d 614]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), entered November 2, 2000, which, upon an order of the same court entered April 26, 2000, granting the motion of the defendant K-Mart Corporation for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against that defendant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The respondent made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that it did not create or have actual or constructive notice of the oil spill upon which the injured plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell *(see,*CPLR 3212 [b]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Florio, J.P., O’Brien, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.
L~ r,-F :_ U i L ~ 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON D.C . 20460 

OFFICE OF 

PREVENTION, PESTICIDES, AND 

TOXIC SUBS TANCES 

SEP 11 2009 

Michael A. Santoro 

Director 

Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs 

3M Company 

3M Center, Building 0236-O1-B-10 

St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 

REC'D SrP 17 200q 

RE: EPA Comments on the 3M Phase III Work Plan dated July, 2009 

Dear Mr. Santoro, 

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is providing its comments on the 3M Phase 

3 Work Plan per Section V.E .2 .m of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between EPA 

and the 3M Company/Dyneon, LLC, hereinafter referred to as 3M . EPA appreciates, the 

opportunity to review 3M Phase 3 Work Plan. 

EPA has carefully reviewed the Work Plan and has a few comments which are included 

in the attachment . We believe that a conference call should enable us to discuss these remaining 

issues . We look forward to the discussions which will occur pursuant to the MOU prior to 

implementing the Work Plan. 

. 

Attachment 

illis, Director 

hemical Control Division 

cc: Cathy Fehrenbacher Mail Code 7406M 

Laurence Libelo Mail Code 7406M 

EPA Docket No. EPA-HQ-OPPT-2004-0112 

RECD S E P 17 2.009 
EPA Comments on the 3M Phase 3 Work 

Plan 

Phase 3 Sampling Program and Other Activities 

The work plan states on page 3-1 that no additional surveys of residential water use are 

planned with 2 miles around the 3M plant. We are aware that 3M is working with Region 4 to 

address this issue and therefore agree that it not be included within this Work Plan. 

Soil and Sediment 

EPA questions why surface soil samples for soil and sediments are defined as the 0-12 

inch zone on page3-11 . This is inconsistent with previous sampling and with the borings for the 

wells. If it is necessary to have the full top twelve inches for root zone information, then the 0-

6" and 6-12" zones can be averaged. It is important for the former analyses to be comparable to 

the future analyses . 

Vegetative e_U4take Study 

1 . EPA questions why the concentrations of PFOA in reference soils (-8ng/g) are being 

used for the laboratory testing of plants . The contaminated sludge farm soil concentration ranges 

of PFOA should be used as a guide for the laboratory testing as well as the reference 

concentrations . Off-site soil sampling in the WEEC area west of the 3M plant established that 

PFOA can be found in off-site soils at levels comparable to on-site sludge farm soils. (pg. 3-17) 

2. Page 3-19 states that plants grown in the greenhouse will be washed with cold water 

before analysis. Why do the plants grown in a greenhouse need to be washed since they will not 

be exposed to the effects of air deposition, rain, or run-off from PFOA contaminated sources? 

Revision of the SLEA 

Please clarify whether the vaporization and aerosolization studies planned will consider 

the potential gas emissions from heavily contaminated sludge farm soils for on-site workers. 

This was not mentioned on pg. 3-21 . It is not clear whether or not all of the sludge farm soils 

will be eventually capped.
1 Participant List US EPA Listening Session on Greenhouse Gas Sta ndards for Utilities and Petroleum Refineries Session with Petroleum Refiners March 4, 2011

FIRST LAST TITLE ORGANIZATION Randy Armstrong Environmental Issues Director Shell Exploration and Production Company Charles Bennett Senior Advanced Environmental Professional Marathon Petroleum Company Roger Christy Environmental Issues Coordinator Chevron Government Affairs Steve Cousins Vice President of Government Affairs Lion Oil Company Howard Feldman Director, Regulatory and Scientific Affairs American Petroleum Institute David Friedman Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs National Petrochemical and Refiners Association Matthew Hodges Senior Manager, Regulatory Affairs Valero Energy Corporation Bob Neufeld Vice President of Environment and Governmental Relations Wyoming Refining Company Derek Wheeler Regulatory Affairs Manager ExxonMobil
EXHIBIT 32.2   NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 26, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Wagenseller, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  June 8, 2010  /s/ DAVID WAGENSELLER David Wagenseller Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 325 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 325

 Providing for a committee to notify the President of the assembly of 
                             the Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 1994

 Mr. Gephardt submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for a committee to notify the President of the assembly of 
                             the Congress.

    Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the 
Speaker on the part of the House of Representatives to join with a 
committee on the part of the Senate to notify the President of the 
United States that a quorum of each House has assembled and Congress is 
ready to receive any communication that he may be pleased to make.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-89928) pertaining to the ANADIGICS, Inc. Stock Option
Plan, 1994 Long-Term Incentive and Share Award Plan, 1995 Long-Term Incentive
Share Award Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-32533 and Form S-8 No. 333-63836) pertaining to the
ANADIGICS, Inc. 1997 Long-Term Incentive and Share Award Plan for Employees, of
our report dated January 29, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of ANADIGICS, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.


                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

MetroPark, New Jersey
March 27, 2002


                                       49
257 La. 169

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Pinky GOODEN.

No. 51013.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1970.

In re: Pinky Gooden applying for writ of certiorari.

The application is not considered. Sentence has not been imposed. The application is premature.
#### Jerry ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-282.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 25, 1970.

Jerry Roberts, in pro. per., for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and J. Christian Meffert, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*473PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ„ concur.
#### Donald S. ANDREWS et al., Appellants, v. Carvel C. LINDEN et al., Appellees.

No. 73-575.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 18, 1973.

Richard P. Kenney, Miami, for appellants.

Patton, Kanner, Nadeau, Segal & Stobs and Thomas C. Britton, Miami, for appel-lees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

An action filed by the appellants against Indian Creek Village and its councilmen claimed invalidity of an amendment to the charter of the municipality whereby nonresident property owners were included as persons entitled to register and vote in general or special elections of the municipality. The trial court entered judgment upholding the amendment, and the plaintiffs appealed.

The judgment included the following:

> “Ordered and Adjudged that the charter amendment submitted to the electorate of Indian Creek Village on March 30, 1973, is valid and constitutional. A city charter may permit non-resident property owners to participate in city elections. 29 C.J.S. Elections § 19d; Hisgen v. Rileigh, Fla.App.1959, 115 So.2d 715. Recent federal decisions, following Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15, 1969, 395 U.S. 621, 89 S.Ct. 1886, 23 L.Ed. 583, have held it unlawful to restrict elections solely to property owners. However, there is no reason from anything held or said in these decisions to conclude that it would be unlawful to expand the franchise to include property owners. This decision has been made by the residents of the Village in an election restricted to residents. This charter amendment recognizes the stake that property owners have in Village government and gives them a right to participate.

> “Under the Dade County Home Rule Amendment to the Florida Constitution, Article VIII, § 6(e) [F.S.A.] the method provided by the Dade County Home Rule Charter, § 5.03, is the only way in which a city charter can be amended in Dade County. Indian Creek Village followed that procedure in submitting this amendment to its electorate. Plaintiffs have shown no reason why it should be declared invalid.”

We have considered the contentions of the appellants presented on the appeal and conclude that no reversible error has been shown. In our view the trial court properly decided the case on the applicable law, *399and we find no need to enlarge thereon. Hisgen v. Rileigh, Fla.App.1959, 115 So.2d 715, cited and relied on by the trial court supports the judgment.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10.2

                          GLOBAL MARINE
               1998 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN

                         First Amendment
                   ____________________________


     The Global Marine 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the
"Plan") is hereby amended as follows, effective upon approval of
this Amendment by the stockholders of Global Marine Inc. at said
company's 2000 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournment
thereof:

     1.  Clause I in the first sentence of paragraph 6.2(a)(i) of
the Plan, which currently reads "(I) 7,500,000 shares of stock;" is
hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: "(I) 15,000,000
shares of stock;".

     2.  Terms used in this Amendment and not defined herein are
used herein as they are defined in the Plan.  References in the
Plan to "this Plan" (and indirect references such as "hereof" and
"herein") are amended to refer to the Plan as amended by this
Amendment.

     3.  Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall remain
in full force and effect.
#### Frederick PEIRCE, Jr., Appellant, v. BOCA LOUNGE, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-69.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 586

Expressing their profound thanks and appreciation to the Honorable Thomas

S. Foley, Speaker of the House of Representatives, for the very fair

and impartial manner with which he has presided over our deliberations

and performed the arduous duties of the chair during his tenure as

Speaker.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 29, 1994

Mr. MICHEL submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing their profound thanks and appreciation to the

Honorable Thomas S. Foley, Speaker of the House of

Representatives, for the very fair and impartial manner

with which he has presided over our deliberations and

performed the arduous duties of the chair during his

tenure as Speaker.

1 Resolved, That Members of the House express their

2 profound thanks and appreciation to the Honorable Thom3 as S. Foley, Speaker of the House of Representatives for

4 the very fair and impartial manner with which he has pre-
2

HRES 586 ATH

1 sided over our deliberations and performed the arduous

2 duties of the chair during his tenure as Speaker.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000751256    
<NAME>                              DYCO OIL AND GAS PROGRAM 1985-2 LTD PSHIP
                                     
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                    26,412
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                             13,786
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          40,198
<PP&E>                                22,431,129
<DEPRECIATION>                        22,391,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           134,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      4,238
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                               121,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             134,196
<SALES>                                  126,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         143,847
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            125,841
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           18,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       18,006
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              18,006
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               4.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        
 

</TABLE>
# C_2023216EN.01000901.xml

| 19.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 April 2023 — Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di San Paolo v European Commission

(Case C-492/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Healthcare services - Direct grants to public hospitals in the Lazio Region (Italy) - Decision finding that there is no State aid - Articles 106 and 107 TFEU - Concepts of ‘undertaking’ and ‘economic activity’)

(2023/C 216/11)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di San Paolo (represented by: F. Rosi, avvocato)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: M. Pere, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di San Paolo to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di San Paolo to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 471, 22.11.2021.

---
# C_2021289EN.01002402.xml

| 19.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 6 April 2021 — Italy Emergenza Cooperativa Sociale v Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Cosenza

(Case C-214/21)

(2021/C 289/34)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant: Italy Emergenza Cooperativa Sociale

Defendant and respondent: Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Cosenza

Intervener: ANPAS — Associazione Nazionale Pubbliche Assistenze Odv

Question referred

Does Article 10(h) of Directive 2014/24/EU (1) — together with recital 28 of that directive — preclude national legislation which provides that contracts for the provision of emergency ambulance transport services may be directly awarded, on a preferential basis, solely to voluntary organisations — provided that they have been registered for at least six months in the national third sector register, belong to a network of associations and are accredited under the relevant sectoral regional legislation (if any) and on the condition that such an award ensures that the service can be provided within a framework of effective contributions to social goals, which pursues objectives of solidarity, in an economically efficient and appropriate manner and in accordance with the principles of transparency and non-discrimination — to the exclusion of other non-profit organisations, and more specifically social cooperatives, such as non-profit-making social enterprises, including social cooperatives which offer rebates to their members in relation to activities of general interest, within the meaning of Article 3(2a) of Legislative Decree No 112/2017?

---

(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).

---