alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021242EN.01001202.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 9 April 2021 — ‘HA.EN.’ UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija

(Case C-227/21)

(2021/C 242/16)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘HA.EN.’ UAB

Defendant: Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija

Question referred

Is Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, (1) in conjunction with the principle of fiscal neutrality, to be interpreted as prohibiting or not prohibiting a practice of national authorities under which the right of a taxable person to deduct input VAT is denied where that person, when acquiring items of immovable property, knew (or should have known) that the supplier, due to his insolvency, would not pay (or would not be able to pay) the output VAT into the State budget?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

---
|   | (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 780(d); and                 |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|   | (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                           |   |                        |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                           |   |
| By:                                                            |   | /s/ B. Fred Oden, III  |   |   |
| President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |                        |
**Exhibit 32(c)**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1)    | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and        |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Georgia Power Company. |

 

 

 

|   | /s/Michael D. Garrett

Michael D. Garrett

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/Cliff S. Thrasher

Cliff S. Thrasher

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

  |

 

Date:  November 29, 2007
#### Kenneth L. STRINGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-17.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 26, 1972.

Rehearing Denied July 21, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Ricardo Bernandes, in my capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of California Steel
Industries, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:



the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003, filed by California Steel Industries, Inc., on March 8, 2004, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in such annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
California Steel Industries, Inc.



Dated: March 8, 2004



By:

/s/    RICARDO BERNARDESRicardo BernardesExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 135 (Friday, July 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 32699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14969]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: July 13, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria W. Votsch, 202-268-6525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[reg] hereby 
gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on July 
9, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS Request 
to Add Priority Mail Contract 453 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-191, CP2018-
267.

Maria W. Votsch,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-14969 Filed 7-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

YUDITH PEREZ

- LOPEZ
, Appellant,

v.

JUMBO EXPRESS, INC., et al

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3493

[ May 17, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Joseph Marx , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502015CA008676XXXXMB

.

Maria Abellon of Abellon, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Michael K. Mittelmark of Michaud, Mittelmark, Marowitz & Asrani PLLC,

Boca Raton , for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

D AMOORGIAN

, F ORST and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
|   | a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                   |   /s/ Michael R. Elia                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael R. Elia Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 547 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 225
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 547

                          [Report No. 103-749]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 4602) making appropriations for the Department of the 
Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     1995, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 1994

    Mr. Gordon, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 4602) making appropriations for the Department of the 
Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     1995, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That all points of order against the conference report to 
accompany the bill (H.R. 4602) making appropriations for the Department 
of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1995, and for other purposes, and against its 
consideration are waived.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 225

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 547

                          [Report No. 103-749]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 4602) making appropriations for the Department of the 
Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     1995, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 26, 1994

       Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 70 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 70

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 4, 1993.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be elected to the following 
standing Committee of the House of Representatives:
    Standards of Official Conduct: Nancy Pelosi, California, to rank after 
Benjamin L. Cardin, Maryland.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2021462EN.01002401.xml

| 15.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/24

---

Appeal brought on 8 February 2021 by Likvidacijska masa iza Mesoprodukt d.o.o. and Gojko Čuljak against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 28 January 2021 in Case T-603/20, Likvidacijska masa iza Mesoprodukt d.o.o. and Gojko Čuljak v European Commission

(Case C-171/21 P)

(2021/C 462/25)

Language of the case: Croatian

Parties

Appellants: Likvidacijska masa iza Mesoprodukt d.o.o. and Gojko Čuljak (represented by: I. Žalac, odvjetnik)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

By order of 1 September 2021, the Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded, dismissed the application for legal aid lodged by Likvidacijska masa iza Mesoprodukt d.o.o. and Mr Gojko Čuljak, and ruled that Likvidacijska masa iza Mesoprodukt d.o.o. and Mr Čuljak are to bear their own costs.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 113 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 113

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to require that persons comply 
with State and local firearms licensing laws before receiving a Federal 
                      license to deal in firearms.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 21 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

  Mr. Moynihan (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to require that persons comply 
with State and local firearms licensing laws before receiving a Federal 
                      license to deal in firearms.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL FIREARMS LICENSING LAWS 
              REQUIRED BEFORE ISSUANCE OF FEDERAL LICENSE TO DEAL IN 
              FIREARMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 923(d)(1) of title 18, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (D);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (E) 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(F) in the case of an application for a license to engage 
        in the business of dealing in firearms--
                    ``(i) the applicant has complied with all 
                requirements imposed on persons desiring to engage in 
                such a business by the State and political subdivision 
                thereof in which the applicant conducts or intends to 
                conduct such business; and
                    ``(ii) the application includes a written statement 
                which--
                            ``(I) is signed by the chief of police of 
                        the locality, or the sheriff of the county, in 
                        which the applicant conducts or intends to 
                        conduct such business, the head of the State 
                        police of such State, or any official 
                        designated by the Secretary; and
                            ``(II) certifies that the information 
                        available to the signer of the statement does 
                        not indicate that the applicant is ineligible 
                        to obtain such a license under the law of such 
                        State and locality.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to applications for a license that is issued on or after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2337

DENNIS R. COOKISH,

Plaintiff- Appellant,

versus

KEYSTONE FINANCIAL BANK, N.A., formerly known

as American Trust Bank,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-99-

2209-L)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 21, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis R. Cookish, Appellant Pro Se. William Stuart Heyman, GORDON,

FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER & HOLLANDER, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s orders are marked as “filed”

on August 10, 1999 and September 13, 1999, the district court’s

records show that they were entered on the docket sheet on August

11, 1999, and September 15, 1999, respectively. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the

date that was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Dennis R. Cookish appeals two district court orders dismissing

his complaint filed pursuant to the Right to Financial Privacy Act

as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West Supp. 1999) and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this

appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Cookish v. Keystone Financial, No. CA-99-2209-L (D. Md. Aug. 11 & Sept. 15, 1999).* We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2020209EN.01002902.xml

| 22.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/29

---

Action brought on 18 March 2020 — JP v Commission

(Case T-179/20)

(2020/C 209/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: JP (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of 17 July 2019 not placing the applicant on the reserve list of successful candidates of Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 — Administrators (AD7), along with the decision of 10 December 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for review; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 17 July 2019 not placing the applicant on the reserve list of successful candidates of Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 — Administrators (AD7), along with the decision of 10 December 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for review;

| — | order the defendant to compensate the damages occurred; and, |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to compensate the damages occurred; and,

| — | order that defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle according to which the members of the Selection Board shall have the necessary abilities to make an objective assessment of the performance and professional qualifications of the applicant during the field-related interview, breach of the principle of equal treatment and breach of the principle of legitimate expectations. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle according to which the members of the Selection Board shall have the necessary abilities to make an objective assessment of the performance and professional qualifications of the applicant during the field-related interview, breach of the principle of equal treatment and breach of the principle of legitimate expectations.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle according to which the composition of the selection board must be sufficiently stable. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle according to which the composition of the selection board must be sufficiently stable.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment.

---
No. 10705.

#### Alkire *v.*Yates.

Decided February 16, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Pickaway county.

*Mr. Clarence Curtain*and *Messrs. Abernethy & Folsom,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. W. Adkins*and *Messrs. Snyder & Lindsay,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Spear, Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
    Dated: May 25, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Timothy P. ONeilTimothy P. ONeilChief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President,
Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
# C_2021513EN.01002001.xml

| 20.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 513/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 513/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 20 September 2021 — LM and NO v HUK-COBURG-Allgemeine Versicherung AG

(Case C-577/21)

(2021/C 513/29)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: LM and NO

Defendant: HUK-COBURG-Allgemeine Versicherung AG

Questions referred

| 1. | Is it contrary to Article 1(1) of Directive 84/5/EEC for the notion of ‘personal injuries’ to be interpreted as meaning that such injury exists in the case of psychological pain and suffering caused to a child by the death of a parent as a result of a road traffic accident only where that pain and suffering has resulted in pathological damage to the child’s health? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is it contrary to Article 1(1) of Directive 84/5/EEC for the notion of ‘personal injuries’ to be interpreted as meaning that such injury exists in the case of psychological pain and suffering caused to a child by the death of a parent as a result of a road traffic accident only where that pain and suffering has resulted in pathological damage to the child’s health?

| 2. | Does the principle that a national court is to interpret national law in conformity with EU law apply where the national court applies not its own national law but that of another Member State of the European Union? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the principle that a national court is to interpret national law in conformity with EU law apply where the national court applies not its own national law but that of another Member State of the European Union?

---