alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.1



   GLOBAL MARINE EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN OF 1990


                         FIRST AMENDMENT


     Global Marine Inc. ("GMI") established the Global Marine
Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan of 1979 (the "Prior Plan")
for the purpose of providing a method of attracting mid-career
executives for key positions within top management by
supplementing the retirement benefit under the Global Marine
Retirement Plan for Employees and any other retirement plan. 
Effective May 9, 1990, the Prior Plan was amended and restated in
its entirety as the Global Marine Executive Supplemental
Retirement Plan of 1990 (the "Plan"),  and Global Marine
Corporate Services Inc. (the "Company") was substituted for GMI
as Plan sponsor with GMI guaranteeing all benefits under the
Plan.  The Company and GMI, in the exercise of the power under
Section 3.1 of the Plan to amend the Plan, do by these presents
amend Section 2.3(c) of the Plan, effective May 9, 1990, to read
as follows:

         "(c)The participant's total years and
         completed months of employment by an
         Employer, to a maximum of fifteen (15)
         years."

         Terms used in this First Amendment and not defined
herein are used as they are defined in the Plan.  References in
the Plan to "this Plan" (and indirect references such as "hereof"
and "herein") are amended to refer to the Plan as amended by this
First Amendment.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and GMI have caused
these present to be executed by their duly authorized officers
this 6th day of May 1997.

                         GLOBAL MARINE CORPORATE SERVICES INC.


                         By:  /S/ J. L. MCCULLOCH
                              President


                         GLOBAL MARINE INC.


                         By:  /S/ J. L. MCCULLOCH
                              Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7558

DUY NGOC TRAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District

Judge. (CA-03-79-3)

Submitted: December 11, 2003 Decided: December 23, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Duy Ngoc Tran, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Duy Ngoc Tran seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) as

untimely. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

§ 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack

v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676,

683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Tran has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny Tran’s motion for transcripts at government

expense, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                            2,841
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        16
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                       3,842
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 10,339
<PP&E>                                                           18,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   37,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             6,413
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           1
<COMMON>                                                             15
<OTHER-SE>                                                       10,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     37,109
<SALES>                                                          31,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 31,143
<CGS>                                                            18,603
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    18,603
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   5,532
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               5,532
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      5,532
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       .37
        


</TABLE>
#### Tommie MOORE, Petitioner, v. GRANT-SHOLK CONSTRUCTION CO., Inc., Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Company, and the Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 40928.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 2, 1971.

*648L. Barry Keyfetz, of Ser & Keyfetz, Miami, for petitioner.

Fred C. Vavant, of Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Davant, Miami, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By motion to strike, we are asked by respondents employer and carrier to remove from the record on appeal the directions for preparation of the record on certiorari, and copies of briefs submitted by the parties during proceedings below in this workmen’s compensation hearing.

The motion is denied. Florida Appellate Rule 4.1, 32 F.S.A., which governs this case, provides the minimum contents of the record on appeal (or cer-tiorari) which will permit the Court an adequate review of prior proceedings. Also, see Florida Appellate Rule 3.6. The Rule is not intended to preclude inclusion in the record on appeal or record on cer-tiorari of any instruments or papers filed in the action which counsel deems to be pertinent and necessary. Instruments which are not necessary to inform this Court fully and adequately will be treated as surplusage and disregarded. It is not the intent of this order to preclude consideration of a motion to strike on proper grounds, but to discourage such motions grounded on technical and non-prejudicial noncompli-anee with the Rules. This will expedite disposition of the action, especially in workmen’s compensation cases such as the action *sub judice.*

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, TT., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6679

DILLARD J. MURRAY, II, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-04-640-7-SGW) Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 5, 2005 Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dillard J. Murray, II, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Dillard J. Murray, II, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000), as procedurally defaulted, and denying his motion for default judgment. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Murray has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 456 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 456

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 15, 1994.
    Resolved, That Representative Ron Lewis of Kentucky be, and is hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives: 
Committee on Agriculture and Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7234

WILLIAM ABDULLAH MUSTAFA, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. THEODIS BECK, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:08-cv-00892-JAB-DPD)

Submitted: September 24, 2009 Decided: November 16, 2009

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Abdullah Mustafa, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Abdullah Mustafa seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mustafa has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 10573.

#### The Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. *v.*Grose by etc.

Decided December 8, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Hancock county.

*Mr. F. W. Stevens; Mr. C. G. Cunningham■; Mr. H. F. Burket; Mr. Edward Colston*and *Messrs. Seiders & Cunningham,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John W. Grimm; Mr. Ross J. Wetherald*and *Messrs. Ross & Kinder,*for defendant in error.

Judgment reversed and judgment in favor of plaintiff in error, on authority of *Railroad Company*v. *Harvey, 77*Ohio St., 235.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,832
<SECURITIES>                                        89
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,539
<ALLOWANCES>                                       233
<INVENTORY>                                      1,802
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,905
<PP&E>                                           2,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,315
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           599
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         12,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,417
<CGS>                                            4,202
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,710
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,063
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,647
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,647
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $2.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# uCongrea of the Eniteb 6tateg

wou g e of Repre5eutatibeg Wa g fjington, )M

,C 20515-3307 WEB PAGE: www.house.gov/mcintyre



# October 18, 2013 CO-CHAIRMAN 

## SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES CAUCUS

CO-CHAIRMAN 

## CONGRESSIONAL WATERWAYS CAUCUS

CO-CHAIRMAN 

## CONGRESSIONAL CAUCUSES ON THE UNITED KINGDOM AND SCOTLAND

CO-CHAIRMAN 

## U.S. AIR FORCE CAUCUS CO-CHAIRMAN 

## TASK FORCE ON RESPONSIBLE

FATHERHOOD CO-CHAIRMAN 

## CONGRESSIONAL CAUCUS ON YOUTH SPORTS CO-CHAIRMAN 

## CONGRESSIONAL PRAYER CAUCUS 

# MIKE McINTYRE 7TH DISTRICT, NORTH CAROLINA 

## COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES

RANKING MEMBER SUBCOMMITTEE ON SEAPOWER AND PR0.IECTION FORCES SUBCOMMITTEE ON TACTICAL AIR AND LAND FORCES 

## COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE SUBCOMMITTEE ON LIVESTOCK, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND CREDIT SU9COMMITTEE ON CONSERVATION, ENERGY AND FORESTRY U.S. HELSINKI COMMISSIONER 

## ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE 

# The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 Dear Administrator McCarthy: I am writing to request that the EPA lower the 2014 volumes for Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) to keep the total volumes of ethanol below the 10 percent threshold. 

# As you know, the EPA is uniquely situated to provide temporary relief to the market through adjustment of the required RFS volume levels. With Americans using less gasoline, many refiners are struggling to meet the biofuels mandate without putting engines at risk. As such, I respectfully request that the EPA evaluate the availability of renewable fuels as well as the constraints on consumption, and consider lowering the federal mandate to align with gasoline market conditions and realities.

Sincerely, 

# ^ Mike McIntyre Member of Congress

2428 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING 119 COURTHOUSE DRIVE 497 OLDE WATERFORDE WAY SMITHFIELD TOWN NALL 

### WASHwcroN, DC 20515-3307 P.O. Box 2107 SUiTF 206 350 MARKET STREET

(202)225-2731 ELIZABETHTOWN, NC 28337 LELAND, NC 28451 

### P.O. Box 761 FAx:(202)225-5773 (910)862-1487 (910)399-1134 SMITHFIELD, NC 27577 FAx:(910)862-2286 FAx:19101399-4172

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Exhibit 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement of
American Safety Razor Company and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No.  333-38779)
of our report dated  February 12, 1999,  except as to the  information  entitled
"Cotton Matters"  presented in Note 11, for which the date is March 26, 1999, on
our audits of the  consolidated  financial  statements  and financial  statement
schedule of American  Safety Razor Company and  subsidiaries  as of December 31,
1998 and 1997, and for the years ended December 31, 1998,  1997, and 1996, which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.






                                              PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Richmond, Virginia
March 26, 1999
#### Mattie N. PARKER, Appellant, v. Jack D. HYNDMAN, Appellee.

No. J-130.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Feb. 20, 1968.

S. Perry Penland and James C. Handly, Jr., Jacksonville, for appellant.

Boyd, Jenerette & Leemis, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Mrs. Parker, appealed from an adverse summary judgment in an automobile collision case.

On July 18, 1965, between 6:00 and 7:00 p. m. on a rainy day, Jack Hyndman was driving his Volkswagen south in the right-hand lane of Interstate 75 near Lake City. He had an accident and departed the scene leaving his Volkswagen unattended and parked on the traveled portion of the roadway. Minutes later Mrs. Parker, also traveling south in the right-hand lane, ran into the parked Volkswagen.

Mrs. Parker brought this action alleging that the proximate cause of her accident was Hyndman’s negligence in leaving his car parked in the traffic lane of the Interstate Highway. Defendant answered alleging contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff, and later moved for summary judgment based on the pleadings and depositions of the parties.

Mrs. Parker deposed that she was driving about 30 or 35 miles per hour; her lights were on and her windshield wipers were operating, but it was not dark and she had no trouble with visibility; she first saw the Volkswagen when she was about half a mile away; its lights were not burning; she continued to see it as she drove along; from the time she first saw it, there were no cars between her and the Volkswagen; although she was gradually overtaking it, she did not realize that the Volkswagen *40wasn’t moving until she was about four car-lengths away; and at that time there were cars passing her in the left lane so all she could do was to put on brakes and skid into the Volkswagen.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and resolving all inferences in her favor, the trial judge correctly concluded that, although Hyndman was negligent, the proximate cause of Mrs. Parker’s accident was her own negligence, since she admittedly saw the prior accident while 2,640 feet away but took no precautions for her own safety.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1





|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|Certification of CEO and CFO                 
|Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,          
|As Adopted Pursuant to                       
|Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Housing Programs Ltd. (the "Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: March 31, 2008   
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: March 31, 2008   



This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON , D . C . 2 04 60

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION 

## M EM ORANDUM Subjec t: From : To : Summary of S t a keholder Mee tin gs Cari ssa Cyran D ockets E PA- I IQ-O A R- 20 13 - 0602. E PA -H Q-OA R- 20 1 3 -0603. and E P A -1 IQO A R- 20 1 3 -04 95 T hi s mem o randum s ummari zes meetin gs w ith s tak e h o lders during the week of June 22 . 20 15 . On Jun e 23, Associate Assis t a n t A dmini s trator for Cl imate and Se ni o r Co unsel fo r A ir and Rad iation .J oseph Goffman m et wi th r ep res e ntati ve s f rom th e Na tion a l Allia n ce or Forest Owner s . ig n-in s heet attac hed. O n Jun e 24, Act in g Ass is tant Ad mini s tra to r for Air a nd Radi a tion Jan e t McCabe and Assoc ia t e Ass istan t Ad mini strato r for C li mate a nd Se ni or Co un se l for A ir and Radi a tion J o seph Goffm a n met with Govern or o f the Stale of Hawaii Dav id l ge and Cindy McMillan. Dir ec to r o f Co mmuni cati o n s for the State of Hawaii.

Internet Address (URL) · http //www epa gov R ec ycled / Re c y cl able • Pr•nted w•th Vegetable Od Based Inks on IOO'o Postconsumer Process Chlorone Free Recycled Paper

### Date: June 23, 2015 

### Meeting : Ge n eral Discussion Rule(s) Discussed: 

# c,p 

# p Written Materials?



### ~ Name Organization Phone Number

**N~b** ---'--- '>--/------- --#-n-F--1- --j



# _....:::...... **EJ .r__:;_llf=-J__~_**  2 tJ 

# 2 

# 561/

# Z7P 1



# ~ I
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. C. W. TITUS, Incorporated.

No. 1480.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

March 8, 1937.

James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

L. E. Cahill, of Tulsa, Old, for respondent.

Before LEWIS, PHILLIPS, and BRATTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for review dismissed on stipulation.