Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2020
                              Justin Heller, M.D., DAB CR5741 (2020)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Justin Heller, M.D., DAB CR5741 (2020)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Justin Heller, M.D.,
(NPI: 1639373590 / PTAN: GR630Z),
Petitioner,

v.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-18-1336Decision No. CR5741October 19, 2020

        
              
    

      DECISION

Petitioner, Justin Heller, M.D., is a physician, practicing in California, who participates in the Medicare program as a supplier of services.  His Medicare billing privileges were deactivated and he subsequently re-enrolled in the program.  The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) granted his application, with an effective date of February 16, 2018, resulting in a 15-day coverage gap.

Because Petitioner filed his subsequently-approved enrollment application on February 16, 2018, I find that February 16 is the correct effective date for his re-enrollment.

Background

In a notice letter dated April 2, 2018, the Medicare contractor, Noridian Healthcare Solutions, advised Petitioner that it approved his revalidated Medicare enrollment application with a gap in billing privileges from February 1 through 15, 2018.  CMS Ex. 10.

Petitioner requested reconsideration.  In his request, he conceded that, in responding to the contractor’s September 2017 request to revalidate his enrollment, his staff had, due to “an inadvertent clerical error,” submitted the wrong application form.  He asked the

Page 2

contractor to make “an exception to [the] timeliness of the revalidation application” and to reinstate his billing privileges with an effective date of February 1, 2018.  CMS Ex. 11 at 2.  In a reconsidered determination, dated July 19, 2018, the contractor affirmed the initial determination.  CMS Ex. 14.  Petitioner appealed.

CMS moves for summary judgment.  However, because neither party proposes any witnesses, an in-person hearing would serve no purpose.  *See* Acknowledgment and Prehearing Order at 4, 5, 6 (¶¶ 4(c)(iv), 8, 10) (September 24, 2018).  I may therefore decide this case based on the written record, without considering whether the standards for summary judgment are satisfied.

CMS submits its motion and brief (CMS Br.) with 15 exhibits (CMS Exs. 1-15).  Petitioner submits a response (P. Br.).  In the absence of any objections, I admit into evidence CMS Exs. 1-15.  *See* Acknowledgment and Pre-hearing Order at 5 (¶ 7).

Discussion

***1. On February 16, 2018, Petitioner filed his subsequently-approved application to reactivate his billing privileges, and the effective date can be no earlier than that date.  42 C.F.R. § 424.520(d).***1

**Enrollment**.  Petitioner Heller participates in the Medicare program as a “supplier” of services.  Social Security Act § 1861(d); 42 C.F.R. § 498.2.  To receive Medicare payments for the services furnished to program beneficiaries, a prospective supplier must enroll in the program.  Act § 1834(j)(1)(A); 42 C.F.R. § 424.505.  “Enrollment” is the process by which CMS and its contractors:  1) identify the prospective supplier; 2) validate the supplier’s eligibility to provide items or services to Medicare beneficiaries; 3) identify and confirm a supplier’s owners and practice location; and 4) grant the supplier Medicare billing privileges.  42 C.F.R. § 424.502.

To enroll, a prospective supplier must complete and submit an enrollment application.  42 C.F.R. §§ 424.510(d)(1), 424.515(a).  An enrollment application is either a CMS-approved paper application or an electronic process approved by the Office of Management and Budget.  42 C.F.R. § 424.502.2
  When CMS determines that a prospective supplier meets the applicable enrollment requirements, it grants Medicare billing privileges, which means that the supplier can submit claims and receive payments

Page 3

from Medicare for covered services provided to program beneficiaries.  For a physician, the effective date for billing privileges “is the *later*of the date of filing” a subsequently-approved enrollment application or “the date that the supplier first began furnishing services at a new practice location.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.520(d) (emphasis added).

**Revalidation and deactivation**.  To maintain his billing privileges, a supplier must, at least every five years, resubmit and recertify the accuracy of his enrollment information, a process referred to as “revalidation.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.515.  In addition to periodic revalidations, CMS may, at other times and for its own reasons, ask a supplier to recertify the accuracy of his enrollment information.  42 C.F.R. § 424.515(d)-(e).  Within 60 days of receiving CMS’s notice to recertify, the supplier must submit an appropriate enrollment application with complete and accurate information and supporting documentation.  42 C.F.R. § 424.515(a)(2).

If, within 90 days from receipt of CMS’s notice, the supplier does not furnish complete and accurate information and all supporting documentation or does not resubmit and certify the accuracy of its enrollment information, CMS may deactivate his billing privileges, and no Medicare payments will be made.  42 C.F.R. §§ 424.540(a)(3), 424.555(b).  To reactivate his billing privileges, the supplier must complete and submit a new enrollment application.  42 C.F.R. § 424.540(b)(1).  It is settled that, following deactivation, section 424.520(d) governs the effective date of reenrollment.  *Howard M. Sokoloff, DPM, MS, Inc.*, DAB No. 2972 (2019); *Urology Grp. of NJ, LLC*, DAB No. 2860 (2018); *Willie Goffney, Jr., M.D.*, DAB No. 2763 at 7 (2017), *aff’d sub nom.*  *Goffney v. Azar*, No. CV 17-8032 MRW (C.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 2019).

I have no authority to review a deactivation.  *Sokoloff*, DAB No. 2972 at 6; *Ark. Health Grp*., DAB No. 2929 at 7-9 (2019).

**Petitioner’s deactivation and reenrollment**.  Here, in a notice letter, dated September 1, 2017, the contractor advised Petitioner to revalidate his Medicare enrollment by updating or confirming all of the information in his record.  The letter specifies that both the record for Justin Heller and the record for his medical group (to which he reassigned his benefits) needed to be revalidated.  It directed him to revalidate, no later than November 30, 2017, by updating his information through PECOS or by submitting an updated paper application (Form CMS-855).  The letter warned that, if he did not respond, his enrollment could be deactivated and he would not be paid for services rendered during the period of deactivation.  CMS Ex. 1.

Page 4

On October 16, 2017,3
 Petitioner filed an enrollment application, CMS-855R, which is used to reassign the physician’s billing privileges to a third party, in this case, the physician’s medical practice.  CMS Ex. 2.  However, Petitioner did not submit an application for himself (CMS 855I).  In a letter dated November 16, 2017, the contractor advised Petitioner that he had submitted the wrong application form and directed him to submit a completed CMS 855I application.  CMS Ex. 3.

Petitioner did not then submit the correct form, and, in a notice dated December 22, 2017, the contractor noted that Petitioner had not revalidated by the November 30, 2017 deadline and again warned that, if Petitioner’s enrollment were deactivated, he would not be paid for services rendered during the period of deactivation.  CMS Ex. 4.

Petitioner did not respond.  In a notice dated February 15, 2018, the contractor advised him that his billing privileges were stopped, effective February 1, 2018, because he had not revalidated his enrollment record or had not responded to requests for more information.  The notice instructed Petitioner to revalidate his enrollment record through PECOS or to submit an updated paper enrollment application, CMS-855.  CMS Ex. 5.

On**February 16, 2018,** Petitioner filed, via PECOS, his Medicare enrollment application (CMS-855I), which the contractor subsequently approved.  CMS Ex. 6.  Thus, pursuant to section 424.520(d), the date Petitioner filed his subsequently-approved enrollment application – February 16, 2018 – is the correct effective date of enrollment.  *Sokoloff,* DAB No. 2972; *Urology Grp.*, DAB No. 2860; *Goffney,* DAB No. 2763 at 7.

Petitioner, however, argues that he is entitled to an effective date based on the date he filed his CMS-855R application (October 16, 2017) because that application was “closed” rather than rejected.  P. Br. at 5.  The Departmental Appeals Board considered a similar argument in *Decatur Health Imaging, LLC*, where the supplier (an independent diagnostic testing facility) argued that its effective date should be based on the date it filed its CMS-855R application (which, as here, the contractor closed) ending the reassignment of benefits to a former (deceased) owner, rather than the date it filed its CMS-855B application, reporting a change in ownership.  Citing the plain language of the regulation, the Board held that the facility’s CMS-855R application was not processed to approval and that the correct effective date of reenrollment must be the date that the supplier filed the application that the contractor subsequently approved, the CMS-855B.  *Decatur Health Imaging, LLC*, DAB No. 2805 at 3-6 (2017).

Page 5

**The issue that is not before me:  the deactivation**.  As the discussion above shows, the case before me is straight-forward.  Petitioner, however, also complains about the deactivation of his enrollment.  He argues:

That the contractor’s September 1, 2017 notice letter, which directed him to revalidate, was “impermissibly vague and ambiguous, leading [him] to believe that he needed to submit form CMS-855R within the prescribed timeframe.”  P. Br. at 2.  This argument strains credulity.  The instructions are easily understood:  revalidate for yourself (Justin Heller) and for your medical practice (Avors Medical Group); use the correct form.  CMS Ex. 1.
	Moreover, even if the September 1 letter confused him, the contractor’s November 16, 2017 letter – to which he did not respond – could not have been more direct:  you submitted the wrong application; “please mail a completed CMS 855I application.”  CMS Ex. 3.
	That the November 16 letter, which included no filing deadline or timeframe, was effectively a new revalidation notice.  The contractor should not have deactivated his enrollment because he filed his February 16 application within 90 days of the November 16 letter.  P. Br. at 6.  He bases this claim on the flimsiest of foundations:  that the November 16 letter tells him exactly which form he must submit and the September 1 letter does not.  The September 1 letter instructs him to submit “the right version of CMS-855,” which is a more than adequate instruction.  CMS Ex. 1 at 1.  Moreover, although the contractor gave Petitioner multiple notices and opportunities to avoid deactivation, it never changed the initial deadline – November 30, 2017 – which was based on the regulations, 42 C.F.R. §§ 424.540(a)(3), 424.555(b). 
	If Petitioner had any doubts about the deadline, the contractor’s December 22, 2017 letter surely laid them to rest.  The letter reiterated the “due date of November 30, 2017.”  CMS Ex. 4 at 1.  And, even though he was well past that deadline, Petitioner could have avoided a payment gap by revalidating his enrollment immediately.  Instead, he delayed for another eight weeks,Thus, Petitioner’s attacks on the deactivation are exceptionally weak.  But even if they had merit (which they do not), I simply have no authority to review the deactivation.  *Sokoloff*, DAB No. 2972 at 6; *Ark. Health Grp*., DAB No. 2929 at 7-9 and cases cited therein.

Finally, Petitioner argues that he should be allowed to bill retrospectively, as authorized by 42 C.F.R. § 424.521.  Under section 424.521(a)(1), CMS may authorize a physician to bill retrospectively for up to 30 days prior to the effective date of enrollment, if

Page 6

circumstances precluded enrollment in advance of providing services to Medicare beneficiaries.  The decision to grant or deny retrospective billing is within CMS’s discretion and I have no authority to review it.  *Wishon Radiological Med. Grp., Inc*., DAB No. 2941 at 5 n.3 (2019).**Conclusion**

Because Petitioner filed his subsequently-approved reenrollment application on February 16, 2018, CMS properly granted his Medicare reenrollment effective that date.


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law. back to note 1
                      2. CMS’s electronic process is referred to as PECOS (Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System). back to note 2
                      3. The Medicare contractor stamped Petitioner’s paper application with a “Julian date stamp,” which counts the days of the year consecutively.  The first two digits stamped on the application (upper left-hand corner) indicate the year – 2017.  The next three digits indicate the date – the 289th day of 2017 or October 16, 2017. back to note 3 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back