alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022294EN.01002701.xml

| 1.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2022 — Apple v EUIPO — Swatch (THINK DIFFERENT)

(Case T-26/21 to T-28/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Earlier EU word marks THINK DIFFERENT - No genuine use of the marks - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(2022/C 294/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Apple Inc. (Cupertino, California, United States) (represented by: I. Junkar, I. Fowler, M. Petersenn and B. Lüthge, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Swatch AG (Biel/Bienne, Switzerland) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

Re:

By its three actions based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 November 2020 (Cases R 2011/2018-4, R 2012/2018-4 and R 2013/2018-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Cases T-26/21 to T-28/21 for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases T-26/21 to T-28/21 for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions;

| 3. | Orders Apple Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Apple Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.

---
House Calendar No. 22

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 137

[Report No. 103–39]

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the

from April 1, 1993, through May 31, 1993.and studies by certain committees of the HouseHouse for continuing expenses of investigations

MARCH 23, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 22

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 137

[Report No. 103–39]

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for continuing

expenses of investigations and studies by certain committees of the House

from April 1, 1993, through May 31, 1993.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 23, 1993

Mr. FROST, from the Committee on House Administration, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered

to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House

for continuing expenses of investigations and studies by

certain committees of the House from April 1, 1993,

through May 31, 1993.

1 Resolved, That there shall be available from the con2 tingent fund of the House such amounts as may be nec3 essary for continuance of investigations and studies by the

4 standing committees of the House, the Permanent Select

5 Committee on Intelligence, and the Joint Committee on
2

•HRES 137 RH

1 the Organization of the Congress, for the period beginning

2 immediately after midnight on March 31, 1993, and end3 ing at midnight on May 31, 1993, on the same terms and

4 conditions as amounts were available to such committees

5 for the period beginning at noon on January 3, 1993, and

6 ending at midnight on March 31, 1993, pursuant to clause

7 5(f) of rule XI of the Rules of the House, except that the

8 entitlement percentage shall be 8.33 percent.
#### Charles Anthony WALKER, a/k/a Anthony Charles Walker, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 72-673, 72-674 and 72-675.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 16, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 29, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 11

                                 EXHIBIT NO. 11

                      BUREAU OF ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING, INC.

                    CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        Nine Months                Nine Months
                                                                  Ended September 30, 1996    Ended September 30, 1995
                                                                  ------------------------    ------------------------
<S>                                                               <C>                            <C>
Net loss                                                              $  (3,434,229)               $  (1,232,504)
                                                                      ==============               ==============

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                       3,523,969                    2,859,018
Stock options and warrants issued prior to initial public
offering at prices less than initial public offering price                         0                       56,625
                                                                           =========                    =========

Other stock options and warrants (a)                                               0                            0
                                                                           =========                    =========
Total weighted average common shares and equivalent common
shares                                                                     3,523,969                    2,915,643
                                                                           =========                    =========


Loss per share                                                             $  (0.97)                    $  (0.42)
                                                                           =========                    =========
</TABLE>


------------------

(a)  Stock options and warrants issued subsequent to December 31, 1994 were not
     dilutive and accordingly not considered in the calculation above.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. ENTERPRISE PROPERTIES, LTD., a Florida limited partnership and Logan J. Manders, Relators, v. E. B. LEATHERMAN, as Clerk of the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida and the Honorable Harvie Duval, as Circuit Judge thereof, Respondents.

No. 71-120.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 3, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
#### John Albert McMICHAEL, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42088.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 6, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 258 So.2d 26.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
#### Donald Harold BARTZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-296.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 25, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1169 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1169

 To provide an exception to the coverage of State and local employees 
                         under Social Security.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 29 (legislative day, June 22), 1993

 Mr. Johnston introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide an exception to the coverage of State and local employees 
                         under Social Security.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO COVERAGE OF STATE AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES UNDER 
              SOCIAL SECURITY.

    (a) Employment Under OASDI.--Subparagraph (F) of section 210(a)(7) 
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 410(a)(7)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (iv),
            (2) by inserting ``or'' at the end of clause (v), and
            (3) by inserting after clause (v) the following new clause:
                    ``(vi) by an individual who is characterized as a 
                part-time, seasonal, or temporary employee by such 
                retirement system;''.
    (b) Employment Under FICA.--Subparagraph (F) of section 3121(b)(7) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (iv),
            (2) by inserting ``or'' at the end of clause (v), and
            (3) by inserting after clause (v) the following new clause:
                    ``(vi) by an individual who is characterized as a 
                part-time, seasonal, or temporary employee by such 
                retirement system;''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to service performed after December 31, 1992.

                                 <all>
```
#### Willie W. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-157.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 16, 1971.

W. C. Airth, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

*227PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 12.2

               California Steel Industries, Inc. and Subsidiary

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Computation Of Ratio Of EBITDA,
                                                  As Adjusted To Interest Expense

                                                                                         Year ended December 31,
                                                                       --------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     (All dollar amounts in thousands)
                                                                         1999       1998       1997       1996       1995
<S>                                                                     <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Income before Income Taxes............................................  77,027     26,816     44,316     67,725    46,988
Add: Interest Expense - Net...........................................  16,345     16,954     13,977     10,145    16,332
Exclude Gain/Loss on Fixed Assets.....................................     (13)       308      1,054      2,518     2,916
Depreciation (Cash Flow)..............................................  26,331     26,659     24,374     18,844    18,623
                                                                        ------     ------     ------     ------    ------
EBITDA, As Adjusted................................................... 119,690     70,737     83,721     99,232    84,859
                                                                        ======     ======     ======     ======    ======

Interest Expense, Net.................................................  16,345     16,954     13,977     10,145    16,332
Ratio EBITDA, As Adj to Interest Expense, Net.........................     7.3        4.2        6.0        9.8       5.2
</TABLE>
#### AMOCO OIL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 45176.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 12, 1974.

Certiorari dismissed.
#### Leroy MARTIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1171.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 11, 1972.

*239Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Bennett H. Brummer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

After a non-jury trial, the appellant was found guilty of (1) breaking and entering a dwelling with intent to commit grand larceny, and (2) grand larceny. He was adjudged guilty and sentenced. On this appeal he urges the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment. The only arguable issue is whether there was sufficient proof of the value of the property taken in order to prove that the taking was grand larceny and not petit larceny. See Todd v. State, Fla.App.1966, 187 So.2d 908.

Our review of the record convinces us that the proof was sufficient. The owner set the value of the stolen television set at $160.00. The owner’s statement was supported by the fact that the television set was purchased for that cost exactly 30 days prior to the theft and was in good working condition. Cf. State v. Phillips, 1971, 83 N.M. 5, 487 P.2d 915. These factors distinguish this case from Todd v. State, supra, and numerous cases holding that the purchase price alone of used personal property is not sufficient to establish value.

Affirmed.
Exhibit No. 32

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. 1350

Each of the undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Gerber Scientific, Inc., hereby certifies that, on the date hereof:

(i)	The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Gerber Scientific, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2005 filed the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)	Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gerber Scientific, Inc.



|Date:  March 10, 2006 | /s/ Marc T. Giles                                   | 
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------- | 
|                      | Marc T. Giles
President and Chief Executive Officer | 



| | /s/ Jay Zager                                               | 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Jay Zager
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

d0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

137063 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137063 

 COA: 275207 

Oakland CC: 2006-208247-FH 

KEONTA JERMAIN GILES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 17, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for the quarterly period ending June, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         141,513
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  996,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,000
<INVENTORY>                                    635,796
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,215,468
<PP&E>                                       2,696,403
<DEPRECIATION>                                 313,264
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,248,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,703,011
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,775,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,172
<OTHER-SE>                                     494,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,248,127
<SALES>                                      1,121,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,121,261
<CGS>                                        1,104,190
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,104,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               130,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,678
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (566,925)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,457
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (577,382)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (577,382)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.92)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the second quarter ended November 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mark W. McCutcheon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   January 12, 2005



/s/ Mark W. McCutcheon
----------------------
Mark W. McCutcheon
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden
Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

                                       22
# C_2022359EN.01006002.xml

| 19.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/60

---

Order of the President of the Court of 30 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — YV v Stadtverkehr Lindau (B) GmbH

(Case C-685/21) (1)

(2022/C 359/69)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 84, 21.2.2022.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

REVIEW AND VACATUR OF LOCAL
ORPHANS’ COURT RULES :

:

:

: NO. 771

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1 st day of June , 201 8

, upon the recommendati on of the Orphans'
Court Procedural Rules Committee :

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania
that:

1) The continued necessity of existing local orphans’ court rules governing guardianship proceedings as of Ju ne 1, 2019 shall be reviewed by the President Judge or his or her designee in light of the Order of this Court, see No. 770 Supreme Court Rules Docket ( June 1 , 2018 )

, rescinding and replacing Rules 14.1 through 14.5 and forms G

- 01 through G

- 04, and amending Rules 1.5 and 5.10 through 5.12 , and Index to Appendix of the Pennsylvania Orphans’ Court
Rules. 2) A local orphans’ court rule d eemed necessary shall be submitted to the Orphans’
Court Procedural Rules Committee no later than December 1, 201 8 for review in
accordance with Pa. O.C. Rule 1.5 and Pa

. R.J.A. No. 103(d). 3) A local orphans’ court rule governing guardianship proceedings not adopted in
accordance with Pa. O.C. Rule 1.5 and Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(d) shall be vacated
effective June 1, 2019

.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b) and shall
be effective immediately.
Exhibit 99



Supplemental Segment Information

|(In thousands)                     | Quarter ended      January 31, | Nine months ended January 31,
|---------------------------------- | ------------------------------ | -----------------------------
|                                   | 2007                           | 2006                         
|Orders Received:                   |                                |                              
|Sign Making and Specialty Graphics | $ 69,926                       | $ 62,986                     
|Apparel and Flexible Materials     | 46,797                         | 49,242                       
|Ophthalmic Lens Processing         | 18,711                         | 16,693                       
|                                   | $135,434                       | $128,921                     







|(In thousands)                     | January 31,2007 | April 30,2006
|---------------------------------- | --------------- | -------------
|Backlog:                           |                 |              
|Sign Making and Specialty Graphics | $ 1,529         | $  2,699     
|Apparel and Flexible Materials     | 39,603          | 40,514       
|Ophthalmic Lens Processing         | 800             | 357          
|                                   | $41,932         | $43,570