alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 265 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 265

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 15, 1993.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 3167) to extend the emergency unemployment compensation program, to 
establish a system of worker profiling, and for other purposes. The first 
reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the 
bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. After 
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
rule. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means 
now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill 
for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule an amendment in the 
nature of a substitute consisting of the bill, modified by the amendments 
recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill. The 
amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points 
of order against the amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. No 
amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order 
except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution. Each amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the 
report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be 
considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, and shall not 
be subject to amendment. All points of order against the amendments printed in 
the report are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 
amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such 
amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in 
the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or 
to the amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order as original text. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 
thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Irving A. SCHAUFELBERGER, Appellant, v. MISTER SOFTEE, INC., a New Jersey corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-1222.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 8, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 12


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   The Gillette Company

                                                                             Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                              Six months        Six months
Dollars in millions                              ended            ended
                                               June 30, 2003   June 30, 2002       2002       2001       2000       1999       1998
                                             ---------------  ---------------      -----      -----      -----      -----      -----
<S>                                                   <C>               <C>       <C>       <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>
Earnings:
       Income from continuing operations
         before income taxes                $            859              748      1,752      1,342      1,288      1,912      1,656
       Interest expense                                   30               44         84        145        223        136         94
       Interest portion of rental expense                 22               20         43         31         25         20         17
       Amortization of capitalized interest                5                5         10          9          6          5          4

                                                       -----            -----      -----      -----      -----      -----      -----
       Earnings available for fixed charges $            916              817      1,889      1,527      1,542      2,073      1,771
                                                       =====            =====      =====      =====      =====      =====      =====

Fixed Charges:
       Interest expense                     $             30               44         84        145        223        136         94
       Interest capitalized                                1                2          4         11         23         13         18
       Iterest portion of rental expense                  22               20         43         31         25         20         17

                                                       -----            -----      -----      -----      -----      -----      -----
       Total fixed charges                  $             53               66        131        187        271        169        129
                                                       =====            =====      =====      =====      =====      =====      =====



Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                      17.3             12.4       14.5        8.2        5.7       12.3       13.7
                                                       =====            =====      =====      =====      =====      =====      =====

</TABLE>
# C_2021382EN.01001401.xml

| 20.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 17 June 2021 — Freikirche der Siebenten-Tags-Adventisten in Deutschland KdöR

(Case C-372/21)

(2021/C 382/18)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: Freikirche der Siebenten-Tags-Adventisten in Deutschland KdöR

Respondent authority: Bildungsdirektion für Vorarlberg

Questions referred

| 1. | In the light of Article 17 TFEU, does a situation in which a religious society that is recognised and established in one Member State of the European Union applies in another Member State for subsidisation of a private school which is recognised as denominational by that religious society and which is operated in that other Member State by an association registered under the law of that other Member State fall within the scope of EU law, in particular Article 56 TFEU?
  If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: |
| --- | --- |

1.

In the light of Article 17 TFEU, does a situation in which a religious society that is recognised and established in one Member State of the European Union applies in another Member State for subsidisation of a private school which is recognised as denominational by that religious society and which is operated in that other Member State by an association registered under the law of that other Member State fall within the scope of EU law, in particular Article 56 TFEU?

If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative:

| 2. | Is Article 56 TFEU to be interpreted as precluding a national rule which provides, as a condition for the subsidisation of denominational private schools, that the applicant must be recognised as a church or religious society under national law? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is Article 56 TFEU to be interpreted as precluding a national rule which provides, as a condition for the subsidisation of denominational private schools, that the applicant must be recognised as a church or religious society under national law?

---
# C_2023083EN.01001802.xml

| 6.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 January 2023 — Romania v Commission

(Case T-33/21) (1)

(EAGGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred by Romania - National rural development programme 2007-2013 - Methods for calculating the rates of support relating to sub-measure ‘1a’ of Measure 215 - Welfare payments for ‘fattening pigs’ and ‘gilts’ - Increase of at least 10 % of the available space allocated to each animal - Obligation to state reasons - Legitimate expectations - Legal certainty - Legal classification of the facts - Article 12(6) and (7) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 907/2014 - Guidelines on the calculation of the financial corrections in the framework of the conformity and financial clearance of accounts procedures)

(2023/C 83/21)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Romania (represented by: E. Gane and L.-E. Baţagoi, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Aquilina, A. Biolan and M. Kaduczak, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, Romania seeks annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1734 of 18 November 2020 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2020 L 390, p. 10), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by Romania for the financial years 2017 to 2019 in the amount of EUR 18 717 475,08.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1734 of 18 November 2020 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by Romania under the EAFRD for the financial years 2017 to 2019 in the amount of EUR 18 717 475,08; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1734 of 18 November 2020 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by Romania under the EAFRD for the financial years 2017 to 2019 in the amount of EUR 18 717 475,08;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 163, 3.5.2021.

---
# Official Journal C 64A/28 F

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 64A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6028 February 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 64A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6028 February 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2017/C 64 A/01 | Selection Procedure PE/195/S — Temporary staff member — Head of Unit (AD 14) — List of suitable candidates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2017/C 64 A/01

Selection Procedure PE/195/S — Temporary staff member — Head of Unit (AD 14) — List of suitable candidates

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

78 

CAF 15-01211 

PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF SANDRA L. COUGHLIN, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KELLY J. COUGHLIN, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

HOPPE & ASSOCIATES, INC., BUFFALO (BERNADETTE M. HOPPE OF COUNSEL),

FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

DEBORAH J. SCINTA, ORCHARD PARK, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

DAVID E. BLACKLEY, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, LOCKPORT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Lisa Bloch

Rodwin, J.), entered July 2, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Family

Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition seeking

modification of the custody provisions in the judgment of divorce with

prejudice. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously modified on the law by providing that the petition is

dismissed without prejudice, and as modified the order is affirmed

without costs. 

Same memorandum as in Matter of Coughlin v Coughlin ([appeal No.

1] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 10, 2017]).

Entered: February 10, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT  32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Dean Wicker, the Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chief Financial Officer of Newsearch, Inc. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY,
that:

     1.   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
          31, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 28th day of October, 2004.


                                   By /s/ Dean Wicker
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                          Dean Wicker, Chief Executive Officer,
                                          President and Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Newsearch, Inc. and will be retained by Newsearch, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the second quarter ended November 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Patty Townsend, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   January 12, 2005



/s/ Patty Townsend
------------------
Patty Townsend
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden
Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

                                       23
#### C. Susann PENDLETON, Appellant, v. Paul J. PENDLETON, Appellee.

No. 71-189.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 26, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2022222EN.01000702.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 7 October 2021 — Financijska agencija v MINERAL-SEKULINE d.o.o.

(Case C-622/21)

(2022/C 222/11)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Financijska agencija

Respondent MINERAL-SEKULINE d.o.o.

Question referred

Can the rule laid down in the second part of the first sentence and in the second sentence of Article 177(3) of the Sudski poslovnik (Rules of Procedure of the Courts), which provides that ‘a case before a court of second instance shall be deemed to be closed on the date on which the decision is sent from the court office, after the case has been returned by the Registration Service. The Registration Service shall be required to return the file to the court office as promptly as possible after receipt thereof. The decision shall then be notified within a further period of eight days’ be considered compatible with Article 19(1) TEU and Article 47 of the Charter?

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DEON MARKEY GLISPY,

Appellant,

v. Case Nos. 5D21-2172

 5D21-2173

LT Case Nos. 2020-CF-022890-A

2019-CF-049435

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Opinion filed October 3, 2022 

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Brevard County, 

David C. Koenig, Judge. 

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and 

Victoria Rose Cordero, Assistant Public 

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, 

for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 
2

Deon Markey Glispy appeals the judgment and sentence imposed 

following the violation and revocation of his community control. We review 

the trial court’s finding of a violation of community control for competent, 

substantial evidence. See Kegler v. State, 313 So. 3d 824, 827 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2021). Glispy had been placed on community control in connection with two 

criminal convictions, including the sale of cocaine. Sixteen days later, he 

was arrested for—among other things—selling cocaine. Competent, 

substantial evidence supported the trial court’s findings on these multiple 

new law violations.

The trial court erred, however, when it concluded that Glispy had 

violated community control by failing to remain confined in his home. This 

condition had exceptions for work-related travel, public service work, or 

special activities. The State did not elicit any competent, substantial 

evidence to support this violation. The community control officer did not 

testify; the State presented no evidence that Glispy’s absence from home 

had not been approved. 

Because it is clear the trial court was focused on Glispy’s drug-related 

violations and not his failure to remain at home, a remand for resentencing 

is unnecessary. See Payet v. State, 47 Fla. L. Weekly D1705, D1705 (Fla. 

5th DCA Aug. 12, 2022). We therefore affirm the trial court’s revocation of 
3

Glispy’s community control but remand for it to strike its finding that Glispy

violated condition sixteen of his community control. 

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, EISNAUGLE and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32-1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Goldfield Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John H. Sottile, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Goldfield Corporation and will be retained by The Goldfield Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:  May 10, 2006

| /s/ John H. Sottile                   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                       |   |
| John H. Sottile                       |   |
| Chairman of the Board of Directors,   |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1117 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1117

To amend the Agricultural Act of 1949 to permit producers on a farm who 
    were prevented from planting the 1993 crop of corn because of a 
 disaster to devote conservation use acreage under the 0/92 program to 
                   soybeans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 16 (legislative day, June 15), 1993

Mr. Pressler (for himself and Mr. Durenberger) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Agricultural Act of 1949 to permit producers on a farm who 
    were prevented from planting the 1993 crop of corn because of a 
 disaster to devote conservation use acreage under the 0/92 program to 
                   soybeans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PREVENTED PLANTED DISASTER ASSISTANCE FOR 1993 CROP OF FEED 
              GRAINS.

    The first sentence of section 105B(c)(1)(F)(ii) of the Agricultural 
Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1444f(c)(1)(F)(ii)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``crambe, and'' and inserting ``crambe,''; 
        and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``and, in the case of producers on a farm who are 
        eligible for a prevented planting disaster payment under 
        paragraph (2)(A) for the 1993 crop of corn, soybeans''.

                                 <all>
```