April 20, 2015

Exemption No. 11398 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–0145

Mr. Marco F. Zvanik Ventus Wind, LLC 7202 Greystone Lane Frisco, TX 75034

Dear Mr. Zvanik:

This letter is to inform you that we have gran ted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you th e conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated January 20, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Ventus Wind, LLC (hereinafter petitioner or oper ator) for an exemption. The exemption would allow the petitioner to opera te an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial inspections of its legacy power generation customers and to expand to support the growth of new customers in the onshore and offshore regions of the United States.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner.2

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petiti oner are the DJI Phantom 2, DJI Phantom 2 Vision+, DJI Inspire 1, and DJI Spreading Wings S-1000.

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates . In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112

− 95 in reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, a nd limited operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation, the S ecretary of Transportation has de termined that this aircraft meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, th e FAA finds that the re quested relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates , and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is

not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial da ta collection. The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all materi al respects to those pr esented in your petition. In Grants of Exemption No s. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial ( see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC ( see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. ( see Docket No.

FAA

− 2014

− 0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifica tions described by the petition er and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of signi ficantly greater proporti ons, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gi ves the FAA good cause to find th at the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for re questing an exemption, I find that—

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously re quested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213 also apply to the situ ation you present; and

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a gr ant of exemption is in the public interest. Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S. C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, Vent us Wind LLC. is granted an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a )(1), 91.409(a)(1) an d (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to3

the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data. This exemption is subject to the conditi ons and limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Ventus Wind, LLC is hereafter referred to as the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions an d limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Phantom 2, DJI Phantom 2 Vision+, DJI Inspire 1, and DJI S-1000 when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are not permitted.

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine compliance with the 87 knot speed restricti on. In no case will the UA be operated at airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level (AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate or

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PI C and VO at all times. The VO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times; electronic messaging or texting is not perm itted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The PIC must en sure that the VO can perform the duties required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating4

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepa ncy exists between the conditions and limitations in this exemption and the pro cedures outlined in the operating documents,

the conditions and limitations herein ta ke precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the pr ocedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revi se its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and pr esent updated and revised documents to the Administrator or any la w enforcement official upon request. The operator must also present updated and revise d documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS

− 80) may be contacted if questi ons arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that aff ect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, e .g. replacement of a flight cr itical component, must undergo a functional test flight prio r to conducting further opera tions under this exemption. Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at least 500 feet from other people. The functi onal test flight must be conducted in such a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the UAS is in a condition for safe flight. Th e pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e .g. inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manu facturer’s maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exempti on must comply with all manufacturer safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC mu st hold either an airline transport, commercial, private, recreational, or sport pi lot certificate. The PIC must also hold a

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a state, the District of Colombia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal5

government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PI C is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to ope rate unless the PIC demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a ma nner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distan ces from persons, vessels, vehi cles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs (training, proficiency, and e xperience-building) and determining the PIC’s ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted dur ing dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and expe rience-building flights, al l persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonpartic ipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparti cipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditi ons (VMC). Flights under special visual flight rule s (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical mile s of an airport reference point (ARP) as denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facil ity Directory (AFD) or for airports not denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption holder. The letter of agreement with the ai rport management must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a pre-determined location within the pr ivate or controlled-access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the even t of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a f light unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the intended operation and to operate after that fo r at least five minutes or with the reserve power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Author ization (COA). All operations shall be conducted in accorda nce with an ATO-issued COA. The6

exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct operations that cannot be conducted unde r the terms of the attached COA.

22. All aircraft operated in accord ance with this exemption must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N

− Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure th e safe operation and flight of the UAS and any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. These

documents must be made available to th e Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give wa y to all manned aviation operations and

activities at all times.

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently pr otect nonparticipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety of nonparticipating persons; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or struct ures has granted permission for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or es sential persons are not considered nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over priv ate or controlled-access property with permission from the property owner/cont roller or authorized representative. Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS

− 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be7

reported to the National Transportation Sa fety Board (NTSB) per instructions

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

.

If this exemption permits operations for th e purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM)

as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction ove r the area of proposed filming. The 3-day notification may be waived w ith the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of the person res ponsible for the on-s cene operation of the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N

− Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PI Cs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtain ed permission from property owners

and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those who gave permission must be made av ailable to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holde r or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, includi ng maps or diagrams of any area, city, town, county, and/or state over which film ing will be conducted and the altitudes essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer th an 500 feet from pa rticipating persons consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the exemption holder’s MPTOM.8

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS operations must comply with al l applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight St andards ServiceVENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC

.

Regulatory Docket No. _______________

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF:

VENTUS WIND LLC,

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (14 CFR) PART 21

SECTIONS ; §§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103, 91.109, 91.119,

91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409 (a)(2), and 91.417(a)

and (b).

CONCERNING OPERATION OF AN UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM

PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE

FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012

Submitted on January 20 , 2015

Ventus Wind LLC.

Marco F. Zvanik (Pro Se.)

7202 Greystone Lane

Frisco, Texas 75034

Tel: (214) 908

- 9444

Email: mzvanik@ventuswind.comVENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS ...............................................

......................... . . .3

SUMMARY ........................................................................

........ .................................. .4

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER .....

.................... ................. ..4

BACKGROUND .............................................

.................... .. ....................................... ..5

BAS IS FOR PETITION .................................................................

............ .................. ..10

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER ..............................

....................... .10

SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH VENTUS

,

SEEKS EXEMP TION......

........................................... ........ . ... 11

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF VENTUS SEEKS AND THE

REASON VENTUS , SEEKS RELIEF & REASONS WHY GRANTING

VENTUS

, REQUEST WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ‘.... .12

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION WOULD

NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY ...........................

.................... .16

FLIGHT OPERATIONS...................................................................21

CONCLUSION ..........................................................................................

. ................ . .. . 24VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 3 GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level

ATC Air Traffic Control

COA Certificate of Authorization

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation

NAS National Airspace System

Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333

SMS Safety Management System

UAV Unmanned Aircraft System

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions

VTOL Vertical Take Off and LandingVENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 4 SUMMARY

Ventus Wind LLC.

, seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.23(b),

61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b) (2), 91.103, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) and

(b), 91.405(a), 1.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b)., as well as the restricted

category airworthiness certification standards specified in 14 C.F.R. § 21.185, including the

requirement to have a certificate of airworthiness as contemplated by 14 C.F.R. Part 21.

This exemption will permit Ventus Wind , LLC. to operate its various Unmanned Aircraft

Vehicles (“ UAV ”) at or above wind power gen eration facilities, onshore oil & gas facilities

,

onshore pipelines and other remote/uninhabited locations , while keeping the documents required

by the regulations at the ground control station and immediately accessible to the pilot in

command. Furthermore, the exemption will relieve Ventus , LLC. f rom the airworthiness

certificate standards and the requirement to have a certificate of airworthiness issued for its

UAV . This exemption will also pe rmit any required markings concerning the operational status

of its UAV to be displayed on the main section of the unmanned aircraft.

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

Ventus , LLC. ( Hereinafter referred to as “ Ventus ”) is a 5 year old wind power plant

inspection firm with a long and well

- recognized history in 3 rd party inspectio ns, Operations &

Maintenance, Expert Witness Services and Root Cause Analysis of failures in the power

generation and composites industry

. Ventus has an extensive history of utilizing multi

- rotor

Vertical Take Off and Landing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , (VTOL) (UAV ’s ), for the purpose of

making highly accurate aerial inspection s of wind turbine rotor blades and onshore pipeline s for

a range of clients and various similar applications.

Since 2009, Ventus has been operating a variety of VTOL aircraft for wind power plant

aerial inspecti ons and will continue to acquire additional UAV’s all under 55 lbs in weight

. As

set forth in this Petition, Ventus seeks to operate its UAV ’s for the special purpose of aerial

inspections of its legacy power generation customers and to expand to support the gr owth of new

customers in the on shore and offshore regions of the United States

. Ventus plans to do this with

a continued focus on safety and the highest standards of quality, maintenance and reliability.VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 5 B ACKGROUND

Unm anned Aircraft Vehicle : DJI PHANTOM II UAV

Ventus seeks an exemption to operate its existing DJI PHANTOM II UAV, for

compensation or hire within the national airspace system (“NAS”).

The DJI PHANTOM II UAV is comprised of a VTOL unmanned aircraft and a

transportable ground station. The DJI PHANTOM II UAV has a maximum gross weight of

approximately one (1 ) pound and the following technical and operational specifications:

Weight (Battery & Propellers included)

- 1030g

Hover Accuracy (Ready to Fly)

- Vertical: 0.8m; Horizontal: 2.5m

Max Yaw Angular Velocity

- 200°/s

Max Tilt Angle

- 35°

Max Ascent / Descent Speed

- Ascent: 6m/s; Descent: 2m/s

Max Flight Speed

- 15m/s

Diagonal Length

- 350mm

Power Consumption

- 5.6W

Flight Time

- 25mins

Take

- off Weight

- ≤1300g

Operating Temperature

-- 10°C ~ 50°C

Supported Battery

- DJI Intelligent Battery

Type

- 3S LiPo

Capacity

- 5200mAh, 11.1V

Charging Environm ent Range

- 0 °C to 40 °C

Discharging Environment Range

-- 20 °C to 50 °C

Operating Frequency

- 2.4GHz ISM

Communication Distance (open area)

- 1000m

Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER)

-- 97dBm

Working Current/Voltage

- 100 mA@6V

Battery

- 4 AA Batteries

The DJI PHANTOM II unmanned aircraft is equipped with four (4) propellers driven byVENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 6

Four (4) Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motor s

.

F IGURE 1 : VENTUS ’s DJI PHANTOM II with GoPro Hero 3 Camera System

1 Ventus will submit an Aircraft Registration Application for each UAV upon the grant of the

exemptions sought by this Petition.

Unm anned Aircraft Vehicle : Inspire 1 UAV

Ventus seeks an exemption to operate its existing Inspire 1, UAV, for compensation or

hire within the national airspace system (“NAS”).

The Inspire 1 UAV is comprised of a VTOL unmanned aircraft and a transportable

ground station. The Inspire 1 UAV has a maximum gross weight of approximately six and one

half (6.5) pounds and the following technical and operational specifications:VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 7

Aircraft Mod el T600

Weight (Battery Included) 2935 g

H overing Accuracy (GPS mode) V ertical: 0.5 m

Horizontal: 2.5 m

Max Angular Velocity Pitch: 300°/s

Yaw: 150°/s

Max Tilt Angle 35°

Max Ascent Speed 5 m/s

Max Descent Speed 4 m/s

Max Speed 22 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind)

Max Flight Altitude 4500 m

Max Wind Speed Resistance 10 m/s

Max Flight Time Approximately 18 minutes

Motor Model DJI 3510

Propeller Model DJI 1345

Indoor Hovering Enabled by default

Operating Temperature Range

- 10° to 40° C

Diagonal Distance 559 to 581 mm

Dimensions 438 x 451 x 301 mm

FIGURE 2: VENTUS ’S INSPIRE 1 WITH BUILT IN VIDEO/CAMERA SYSTEMVENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 8

2 Ventus will submit an Aircraft Registration Application for each UAV upon the grant of the

exemptions sought by this Petition.

Unm anned Aircraft Vehicle: S1000 UAV

Ventus seeks an exemption to operate its existing S1000, UAV, for compensation or hire

within the national airspace system (“NAS”).

The S1000 UAV is comprised of a VTOL unmanned aircraft and a transportable ground station.

The S1000 UAV has a maximum gross weight of approximately nine and one half (9.5) pounds

and the following technical and operational specifications:

Diagonal Wheelbase : 1045mm

Frame Arm Length : 386mm

Frame Arm Weight : 325g (Including Motor, ESC, Propeller )

Center Frame Diameter : 337.5mm

Center Frame Weight : 1330g (with Landing Gear Mounting Base, Servos)

Landing Gear Size : 460mm (Length) ×511mm (Width) ×305mm (Height),

(Top width: 155 mm)

Motor: Stator Size : 41× 14mm

KV : 400rpm/V

Max Power : 500W

Weight : 158g (with Cooling Fan)

Working Current : 40A

Working Voltage : 6S LiPo

Signal Frequency : 30Hz ~ 450Hz

Drive PWM Frequency : 8KHz

Weight : 35g (with Radiators)

Foldable Propeller : (1552/1552R)

Propeller Size : 15×5.2inchVENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 9

Weight : 13g

Takeoff Weight : 6.0Kg ~ 11.0Kg

Total Weight : 4.2Kg

Power Battery : LiPo (6S

、 10000mAh~20000mAh

、 15C(Min))

Max Power Consumption : 4000W

Hover Power Consumption : 1500W (@9.5Kg Takeoff Weight)

Hover Time : 15min (@15000mAh & 9.5Kg Takeoff Weight)

Working Environment Temperature :

- 10 °C ~ +40 °C

For A2 flight controller :

Basic: Roll 120%, Pitch 120%, Yaw 120%

Attitude: Roll 170%, Pitch 170%, Vertical 120%

For WooKong

- M flight con t roller :

Basic: Roll 180%, Pitch 180%, Yaw 120%

Attitude: Roll 180%, Pitch 180%, Vertical 120%

FIGURE 3 : VENTUS ’S S1000 WITH ADDED VIDEO/CAMERA SYSTEMVENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 10

Proven Operational History of: DJI PHANTOM II

, S1000 a nd Inspire 1 UAV in the NAS

The DJI PHANTOM II , S1000 and Inspire 1 UAV’s are currently operating safely within

the NAS . Ventus has been operating UAV ’s under 55 lb s for the past 5 years without any

recorded incident, accident or failure.

BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, Ventus Wind , LLC.

, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section

333, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, hereby petitions the Administrator

for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 4 5.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a),

91.9(b) (2), 91.103, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 1.407(a)(1),

91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). , as well as the restricted category airworthiness certification

standards specified in 14 C.F.R. § 21.185, including the requirement to have a certificate of

airworthiness as contemplated by 14 C.F.R. Part 21.

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, Ventus provides the following information in support of

its petition for exemption:

A) Name a nd Address Of The Petitioner.

The name and address of the Petitioner is:

Ventus Wind , LLC.

Mailing Address: 7202 Greystone

, Frisco, Texas 75034

General Office: 2488 North Pearl Street, Dallas, TX 75201

The point of contact for this Petition and spec ific contact information is as follows:

Marco F. Zvanik

.

Ventus Wind LLC.

Mailing Address: 7202 Greystone Lane

, Frisco, Texas 75034

Tel: ( 214 ) 908

- 9444

Email: mzvanik@ventuswind .comVENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 11

The Specific Sections o f 14 C.F.R. From Which Ventus Seeks Exemption.

1. 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) (1)

Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes the procedural requirements for

the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR §91.203 (a) (1). Give n the size and

limited operating area associated with the aircraft to be utilized by Ventus , an exemption from

Part 21 Subpart H meets the requirements of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and

Section 333 of the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C.§44701 (f)) and Section 333

of the Reform Act both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an

airworthiness certificate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability,

and proximity to airports an d populated areas of the particular UAV . In all cases, an analysis of

these criteria demonstrates that the UAV operated without an airworthiness certificate, in the

restricted environment and under the conditions proposed will be at least as safe, or safer , than a

conventional aircraft (fixed wing or rotorcraft) operating with an airworthiness certificate

without the restrictions and conditions proposed.

All of t he UAV ’s to be operated hereunder are less th an 55 lbs. fully loaded, carry neither a

pilot nor passenger, carry no explosive materials or flam mable liquid fuels, and operate

exclusively within a secured area as set out in the Ventus Operations Manual. Unlike other civil

aircraft, operations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and monito red by both the

operator, pursuant to the Manual’s requirements, and under the requirements and in compliance

with local public safety requirements, to provide security for the area of operation as is now done

with conventional inspections . The FAA will ha ve advance notice of all operations. These safety

enhancements, which already apply to civil aircraft operated in connection with power

generation inspections , provide a greater degree of safety to the public and property owners the n

conventional operation s conducted with airworthiness certificates issued under 14 C.F.R.

Part 21, Subpart H. Lastly, application of these same criteria demonstrates that there is no

credible threat to national security posed by the UAV ’s, due to their size, speed of operation,

location of operation, lack of explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and inability to carry

a substantial external load.VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 12

2. 14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b). Marking of the Aircraft

The regulation requires: When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the

registration number is displayed on limited, restricted or light

- sport category aircraft or

experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraft

near each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot stat ion, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more

than 6 inches high, the words "limited," "restricted," "light

- sport," "experimental," or

"provisional," as applicable.

Even though the UAV will have no airworthiness certificate, an exemption may be

needed a s the UAV will have no entrance to the cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which the

w ord s "limited," "restricted," "light

- sport," "experimental," or "provisional," can be placed.

Given the size of the UAV , two

- inch lettering will be i mpossible. The word " e xperimental,"

may be placed on one of the rotor arms of each UAV

, in compliance with §45.29 (f). The

equivalent level of safety will be provided by having the UAV s marked on their rotor arm as

required by §45.29 (f) where the pilot, observer and others working with the UAV will see the

identification of the UAV as "experimental,".

The FAA has issued the following exemptions to this regulation to Exemptions Nos.

10700, 8738, 10167 and 10167A

.

3. 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) & (b): Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: Pilot in

Command.

Sections 61.113 (a) & (b) limit private pilots to non

- commercial operations. Because the

UAV s will not carry a pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can ach ieve the equivalent

level of safety of current operations by requiring the PIC operating the aircraft to have a private

pilot’s license rather than a commercial pilot’s license to operate these small UAV s . Unlike a

conventional aircraft that carri es the pi lot and passengers, Ventus’ UAV s are remotely controlled

with no living thing on board. The area of operation is controlled and restricted, and all flights

are planned and coordinated in advance as set forth in the Ventus Operations Manual VSI

- 005

Rev. 2 (Manual) . The level of safety provided by the requirements included in the Manual

exceeds that provided by a single individual holding a commercial pilot’s certificate operating a

conventional aircraft. The risks associated with the operati on of the UAV s are so diminished

from the level of risk associated with commercial operations contemplated by Part 61 whenVENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 13

drafted, that allowing operations of the se UAV s as requested with a private pilot as the PIC

exceeds the present level of safety achi eved by 14 C.F.R. §61.113 (a) & (b).

4. 14 C.F.R. §91.7(a): Civil aircraft airworthiness.

The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy

condition. As there will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the aircraft, should this

exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist for determining airworthiness.

Given the size of the aircraft and the requirements contained in the Manual for maintenance and

use of safety check lists prior to each flight, as set forth in Sections J, L and Q, an equivalent

level of safety will be provided.

5. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft.

Section 91.9 (b) (2) provides:

No person may operate a U.S.

- registered civil aircraft ...

(2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by §21.5 of

this chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved airplane or

Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or

any combinat ion thereof.

The UAV s, given their size and configuration have no ability or place to carry such a flight

manual on the aircraft, not only because there is no pilot on boa rd, but because there is no room

or capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft.

The equivalent level of safety will be maintained by keeping the flight manual at the

ground control point where the pilot flying the UAV will have immediate access to it. The FAA

has issued the following exemptions to this regulation: Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299,

9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, 10167A, 10602, 32827, and 10700.VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 14

6. 14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight action

This regulation requires each pilot in command to take certain actions before flight to

insure the safety of flight. As FAA approved rotorcraft flight manuals will not be provided for

t he aircraft an exemption will be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be provided as set

forth in the Manual. The PIC will take all actions including rev iewing weather, flight battery

requirements, landing and takeoff distances and aircraft performance data before initiation of

flight.

7. 14 C.F.R. §91.109: Flight instruction:

Section 91.103 provides that no person may operate a civil aircraft (except a mann ed free

balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual

controls.

UAV s and remotely piloted aircraft, by their desi gn do not have fully functional dual

controls. Flight control is accomplished through the use of a control box that communicates with

the aircraft via radio communications. The FAA has approved exemptions for flight training

without fully functional dual controls for a number of aircraft and for flight instruction in

experimental aircraft. See Exemption Nos.5778K & 9862A. The equivalent level of safety

provided by the fact that neither a pilot nor passengers will be carried in the aircraft and by the

size and speed of the aircraft.

8. 14 C.F.R. §91.119: Minimum safe altitudes

Section 91.119 estab lishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119(d)

allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person

operating the helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the

FAA. As this exemption is for a UAV that is a multi

- rotor VTOL and the exemption requests

authority to operate at altitudes up t o 4 00 ft. AGL, or not more than 200 ft. above an elevated

platform from which operations are planned, an exemption may be needed to allow such

operations. As set forth herein, except for the limited conditions stated in the Manual, the UAV

will never operate at higher than 4 00 ft. AGL. It will however be operated in a restricted area

with securit y perimeter, where buildings and people will not be exposed to operations without

their pre

- obtained consent.VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 15

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed of the UAV s

as well as the location where they will be operated. No flight will be taken without the

permission of the property owner or local officials. Because of the advance notice to the property

owner and participants in the filming activity, all affected individuals will be aware of the

planned flight oper ations as s et forth in the Manual. Compared to flight operations with aircraft

or rotorcraft weighting far more than the maximum 55 lbs. proposed herein and the lack of

flammable fuel, any risk associated with these operations is far less than those presently

present ed with conventional aircraft operating at or below 4 00 ft. AGL in the power generation

industry. In addition, the low

- altitude operations of the UAV s will ensure separation between

these small UAV operations and the operations of conventional aircraft tha t must comply with

Section 91.119.

9. 14 C.F.R. §91.121 Altimeter Settings

This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by

reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate

altimeter setting available before departure.” As the UAV may not have a barometric altimeter,

but instead a GPS altitude read out, an exemption may be needed. An equivalent level of safety

will be achieved by the operator, pursuant to the Manu al and Safety Check list, confirming the

altitude of the launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight.

10. 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions

Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual from beginning “a fli ght in an airplane under

VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel

to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed

– (1) During the

day, to fly after that for at least 3 0 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45

minutes.”

The batteries powering all of Ventus’ UAV ’s provide approximately 3 5 minutes of

powered flight. To meet the 30 minute reserve requirement in 14 CFR §91.151, UAV flights

would be limite d to approximately five (5 ) minutes in length. Given that this limitation would

prohibit the flight of the UAV’s a longer time frame for flight in daylight or night VFR

conditions is reasonable.VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 16

Ventus believes that an exemption from 14 CFR §91.151(a) fall s within the scope of

prior exemptions. See Exemption 10673 (allowing Lockheed Martin Corporation to operate

without compliance with FAR 91.151 (a)). Operating the small UAV , in a tightly controlled area

where only people and property owners or official re presentatives who have signed waivers will

be allowed, with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel, does not engender the type of risks that

Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the small UAV

. Additionally, limiting UAV flights to 5 minutes would greatly reduce the utility for

which the exemption will be granted.

Ventus believes that an equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to

25% of battery power . This restriction would be more than adequate to return the UAV ’s to their

planned l anding zone from anywhere in their limited operating area.

Similar exemptions have been granted to other operations, including Exemptions 2689F,

5745, 10673, and 10808.

11. 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircr aft Certification and Registration

The regulation provides in pertinent part:

(a) Except as provided in § 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft

unless it has within it the following:

(1) An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate. . . .

(b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate

required by paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued

under §91.715 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to

passeng ers or crew.

All of Ventus’ UAV ’s fully loaded weigh no more than 55 lbs and are operated without

an onboard pilot. As such, there is no ability or place to carry certification and registration

documents or to display them on the UAV ’s

. An equivalent leve l of safety will be achieved by keeping these documents at the ground

control point where the pilot flying the UAV will have immediate access to them, to the extent

they are applicable to the UAV . The FAA has issued numerous exemptions to this regulation. AVENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 17

representative sample of other exceptions includes Exemption Nos. 9565, 9665, 9789, 9789A,

9797, 9797A, 9816A, and 10700.

12. 14 C.F.R. §91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections

These regulations require that an aircraft o perator or owner “shall have that aircraft

inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as

provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of

this chapter.. .,” and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43.

Given that these section s and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness

certificate, thes e sections will not apply to Ventus . Maintenance will be accomplished by V entus

pursuant to the flight manual and operating handbook as referenced in the Manual.(See Sections

L and Q) An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because these small UAV s are very

limited in size and will carry a small payload and operate only i n restricted areas for limited

periods of time. If mechanical issues arise the UAV can land immediately and will be operating

from no higher than 4 00 feet AGL. As prov ided in the Manual, Ventus will ensure that every

UAV is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance, and keep a log

of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the operator is the person most familiar with the

aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condit ion to provide the

equivalent level of safety.

13. The Extent Of Relief Ventus Seeks And The Reason Ventus Seeks Relief From 14

C.F.R. § 21.185.

Ventus seeks relief from the airworthiness certificate requirements of the Federal

Aviation Regulations and proposes to commercially operate the DJI PHANTOM II and Inspire 1

UAV , without an airworthiness certificate, for the special purpose of conducting aerial inspection

services for its customers , pursuant to specific operating limitations and a Safety Management

System (“SMS”). Ventus seeks relief from the airworthiness certificate requirements of 14

C.F.R. § 21.185 to the extent that the DJI PHANTOM II and Inspire 1 UAV, which have not yet

been type certificated by t he FAA, may be operated as if they were a restricted category aircraft

for a single, defined, special purpose operation (i.e., aerial inspection ).VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 18

Pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333 (“Section

333”), Ventus seeks relief from the ai rworthiness certificate requirements of the FAR because

operation of the DJI PHANTOM II and Inspire 1 UAV will not create a hazard to users of the

NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Section 333 sets forth the

requirements for considering whether a UAV will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the

public or pose a threat to national security. Further, Section 333 provides the authority for such

UAV to operate without airworthiness certification.

Specifically, Section 333 s tates the following, in part:

(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

-- In making the determination under

subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum

--

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight,

speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation

within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system

or the public or pose a threat to national security; and

(2) whethe r a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness

certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for the

operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1set forth below,

numerous f

actors, including the proven safe operational history of the DJI PHANTOM II

,

S1000 and Inspire 1 UAV in the NAS, as well as the specific parameters of Ventus ’

intended operation pursuant to this exemption, demonstrate that the DJI PHANTOM II

,

S1000 and Ins pire 1 UAV have in the past, and will continue in the future, to operate

safely in the NAS without creating a hazard to other aircraft or people on the ground.

Accordingly, the FAA may approve operation of the DJI PHANTOM II , S1000 and

Inspire 1 UAV

, without an airworthiness certificate, by setting forth specific operating

limitations to ensure a level of safety equivalent to what would be provided by

airworthiness certification.VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 19 *********

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is prov ided for publication in the

Federal Register, should it be determined that publication is needed:

Ventus seeks an exemption from the following rules:

14 C.F.R. §21, subpart H; 14 C.F.R 45.23(b); §§ 61.113( a) & (b); 91.7(a); 91.9 (b) (2);

91.103 (b);91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151 (a); 91.203(a) and (b); 91.405(a); 91.407 (a)

(1); 91. 409 (a) (2); 91.409 (a) (2), 91.417 (a) & (b), as well as the restricted category

airworthiness certification standards specified in 14 C.F.R. § 21.185 to operate

commercially unmanned vehicle (55lbs or less) for aerial inspections.

A pproval of exemptions allowing commercial operations of UAV s in the power

generation inspection industry will enhance safety by reducing risk. Conventional power

generation inspection s , using persons dangling from ropes at altitudes of 300 to 450 feet are

potential cause for falls, death or injury

. In contrast, a Ventus UAV weighing fewer than 55 lbs.

and powered by batteries eliminates virtua lly all human risk to serious falls given that the PIC is

on the ground

. Every Ventus UAV is carried to the inspection site and not flown. The UAV ’s will carry

no p assengers or crew and, therefore, will not expose them to the risks associated with manned

aircraft flights. The operation of small UAV s, weighting less than 55 lbs., conducted in the strict

conditions outlined a bove, will provide an improved level of safety supporting the grant of the

exemptions requested herein, including exempting the Ventus from the requirements of Part 21

and allowing commercial operations. These lightweight aircraft operate at slow speeds, close to

the ground, and in a sterile environment and, as a result, are far safer than conventional

ope rations conducted by humans dangling from ropes

.

Reasons Why Granting Ventus ’s Request Would Be In The Public Interest

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing Ventus to safely,

efficiently, and economically perform aerial inspection services of power generation facilities,

onshore oil and gas platforms, pipelines and land developers Additionally, use of the VentusVENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 20

UAV ’s will increase worker safety by reducing human exposure to rope access work at extreme

heights , increase the frequency of power generation inspections being performed there by

increase power plant safety and provide significant benefits to the reduction in costs associated

with the maintenance of power generation facilities

. Notably, the benefits of the proposed

operation of the Ventus UAV will be realized without implicating any privacy issues.

Figures 4 & 5: Photos of Current Rope Access Inspection TechniquesVENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 21

Privacy :

All flights will occur over private or controlled access property with the property owner’s

prio r consent and knowledge . Aerial inspections will be of power generation equipment,

production facilities or buildings in remote or uninhabited areas

. Set forth below are pictures of aerial inspections conducted in the day environment, as

performed today using humans on ropes. The grant of this exemption request will provide

improved safety in day operations.

Flight Operation s:

Flight Operations pursuant to the exemption sought would b e limited to a reas that are not

in t he proximity of a irports or over populated a reas. Ventus proposes to only conduct aerial

inspection flight operations over private land, in rural areas of the United States that are not near

populated areas, airports, helipads, or state roads.

Specifically, Ventus’ proposed area s of aerial inspections include rural areas that are:

1. Not populated areas as depicted on VFR Sectional Aeronautical Charts;

2. Not within five (5) miles of any airport or helipad;

3. Not within one hundred (100) meters of state roads having more than two lanes; and

4. Not within fifty (50) meters of state roads having two lanes or less.

Ventus has been operating all of its UAV ’s by regulations such as the ICAO (International Civil

Aviation Organization) and the FAA’s own national airspace regulations. In order to increase

flight safet y and prevent accidental flights in restricted areas, all of Ventus’ UAV’s will be

operated utilizing Category “ A ” No Fly Zone restrictions.VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 22 Figure 4: E xample of Category “ A ” No Fly Zone for VentusVENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 23

A buffer or exclusion zone for flight operations will also be implemented around state

roads. Since the roads are represented geometrically as lines, the buffer s re sult as a one hundred

(100m) corridor around state roads with more than two lanes, and fifty (50) meters around state

roads with two lanes or less. In summary, Ventus seeks to operate its UAV’s only over rural

areas , while maintaining safe distances from any populated areas, airports, helipads, or

roadways.

Operation Of Ventus ’ UAV’s Will Be Conducted Pursuant To “VSI

- 005 UAS Operations

Manual (For UAS’s under 55 lb s)

. ”

Ventus’ Operations Manual VSI

- 005 will control operation UAV’s and will significantly

contribute to maintaining the level of safety contemplated by the airworthiness certificate

requirements from which Ventus now seeks rel ief. Pursuant to the Operations Manual and 14

C.F.R. § 43.13, entitled Performance Rules (general), each person performing maintenance,

alteration, or preventive maintenance on any of Ventus’ UAV’s , motor s , propeller s
, hardware,

guidance systems or applia nce s shall use the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the

current manufacturer's maintenance manual or Instructions for Continued Airworthiness

prepared by its manufacturer, or other methods, techniques, an d practices acceptable to the

Admini strator. Each person shall use the tools, equipment, and tes t apparatus necessary to assure

completion of the work in accordance with accepted industry practices.

A copy of the Operations Manual , which is proprietary information to Ventus , is attached

here to as Exhibit B, and is to be held in a separate file pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.35(b).3

Flight Operations Of Ventus’ UAV’s Are Limited To Line Of Sight Of The PIC With A

Safety Observer.

Ventus will only utilize PIC’s with a valid Recreational or Private Pilot rating certificate

issued by the FAA for operation of all UAV’s and a Class II Medical Certificate

. Additionally,

all pilots will be assisted by a safety observer. The pilot in command and safety observer must

meet the requirements as set forth by the Operations Manual adopted by Ventus for flight

operations of the UAV’s

.VENTUS SECTION 333 PETITION 7202 Greystone, Frisco, Texas 75034 Page 24

CONLUSION:

Satisfaction of the criteria provided in Section 333 o f the Reform Act of 2012

-- size,

weight, speed, operating capabilities, proximity to airports an d populated areas and operation

within visual line of sight and national security

– provide more than adequate justification for the

grant of the requested exemptions allowing commercial operation of applicant’s UAS in the

power generation industry pursuan t to the Manual appended hereto.

________________ ___________ __ Submitted on January 20 , 201 5

Marco F. Zvanik (Pro Se.)

7202 Greystone Lane

Frisco, Texas 75034

Tel: (214) 908

- 9444

Email: mzvanik@ventuswind.com