alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MELBOURNE CIVIC IMPROVEMENT BOARD, an agency of the former City of Melbourne, John B. Yeisley, Orren H. Cross, James Adsit, M. H. Arbogast, Harding C. Bailey, individually and as duly appointed members of the Melbourne Civic Improvement Board, Appellants, v. CITY OF MELBOURNE, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-342.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 433 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 165

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 433

                          [Report No. 103-523]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 4453) making 
appropriations for military construction for the Department of Defense 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 23, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                 House Calendar No. 165
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 433

                          [Report No. 103-523]

  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 4453) making 
appropriations for military construction for the Department of Defense 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 1994

 Mr. Hall of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 4453) making 
appropriations for military construction for the Department of Defense 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That during consideration of the bill (H.R. 4453) making 
appropriations for military construction for the Department of Defense 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes, 
all points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to 
comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are waived.
```
# C_2022472EN.01002101.xml

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/21

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 October 2022 — CE v Committee of the Regions

(Case C-539/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil Service - Temporary Staff - Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union - Article 2(c) - Contract for an indefinite period - Early termination with notice - Article 47(c)(i) - Breakdown in relationship of trust - Terms implementing the notice - Manifest error of assessment and error of law - Omissions - Action for annulment and for damages)

(2022/C 472/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: CE (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: Committee of the Regions (represented by: S. Bachotet and M. Espárrago Arzadun, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders CE to bear her costs and to pay those incurred by the Committee of the Regions. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders CE to bear her costs and to pay those incurred by the Committee of the Regions.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 24.1.2022.

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Howard S. Modlin,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, and I, William G.
Henry, Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer,
each of General DataComm Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), do each hereby
certify, except to the extent such Report is deemed incomplete for failure to
have quarterly financial review by independent auditors, to the best of my
knowledge that:





(1) The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended  December
31, 2009 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not be deemed
as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying
officer.





/s/ Howard S. ModlinDate:  February
      16, 2010
              Howard
      S. Modlin,Chairman
      of the Board, President andChief
      Executive Officer





/s/ William G. HenryWilliam
      G. HenryVice
      President, Finance and Administrationand
      Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Golden  Enterprises,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the first  quarter  ended  August 31, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Patty Townsend,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   October 8, 2004



/s/ PATTY TOWNSEND
------------------------------------------
Patty Townsend
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Gwynne P. DAVIS and Edith D. Benjamin, Appellants, v. John N. ARFARAS and Frances J. Arfaras, Appellees.

No. 67-170.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 19, 1968.

John L. Estes, of Mosley & Donahey, Clearwater, for appellants.

Harold S. Wilson, of Wilson & Walker, Largo, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Sutton v. Crane, Fla.App.1958, 101 So.2d 823 and Kaminsky v. Wye, Fla.App.1961, 132 So.2d 44.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and SHANNON and PIERCE, JJ., concur.
IV

House Calendar No. 249

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 579

[Report No. 103–851]

Providing for the adoption of the resolution (H. Res. 578) amending the

Rules of the House of Representatives to apply certain laws to the

House of Representatives, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1994

Mr. MOAKLEY, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for the adoption of the resolution (H. Res. 578)

amending the Rules of the House of Representatives

to apply certain laws to the House of Representatives,

and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That House Resolution 578 is hereby

2 adopted.
House Calendar No. 249

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 579

[Report No. 103–851]

RESOLUTION

Providing for the adoption of the resolution (H.

poses.House of Representatives, and for other purRepresentatives to apply certain laws to theRes. 578) amending the Rules of the House of

OCTOBER 7, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
# C_2023071EN.01001402.xml

| 27.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/14

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022 — Council v FI (C-313/21 P) and Commission v FI (C-314/21 P)

(Joined Cases C-313/21 P and C-314/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 182 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Civil service - Pension - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 20 of Annex VIII - Grant of a survivor’s pension - Surviving spouse of a former official who was in receipt of invalidity allowance - Marriage entered into after that official became entitled to invalidity allowance - Condition that the marriage must have lasted for at least five years at the date of the official’s death - Article 19 of Annex VIII - Marriage entered into before that official became entitled to invalidity allowance - No condition as to the minimum duration of the marriage - Plea of illegality in respect of Article 20 of Annex VIII - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 20 - Principle of equal treatment - Article 21(1) - Principle of non-discrimination - Article 52(1) - No arbitrary or manifestly inappropriate differentiation in the light of the objective pursued by the EU legislature)

(2023/C 71/17)

Language of the case: French

Parties

In Case C-313/21 P:

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, M. Alver, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: FI, European Commission, European Parliament

In Case C-314/21 P:

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: T.S. Bohr, B. Mongin, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: FI, European Parliament, Council of the European Union

By order of 22 December 2022, the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 10 March 2021, FI v Commission (T-694/19, not published, EU:T:2021:122), dismissed the action brought by FI in Case T-694/19, ordered FI to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Commission in Case T-694/19 and in Cases C-313/21 P and C-314/21 P and ordered the European Parliament to bear the costs incurred in Case T-694/19.

---

(1)  Date of filing: 19.5.2021.

---
No. 10757.

#### The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. *v.*Waddell.

Decided February 23, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Marion county.

*Messrs. Mouser & Quigley*and *Mr. L. J.*Hackney, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Jacoby & Donithen*and *Messrs. Scoñeld, Durfee & Scofield,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear and Price, JJ., concur.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 21, 2011

t1114 

# Order

November 21, 2011

143562

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143562 COA: 304597 Muskegon CC: 10-058968-FC JORY PATRICK LANG, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 25, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Johnny C. HARRIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-672.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 24, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Mark King Leban, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Linda C. Hertz (Legal Intern), for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to withdraw his waiver of jury in a criminal trial.

The state has conceded in its brief that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion and we are in accord with the state’s view. Floyd v. State, Fla.1956, 90 So.2d 105.

*411The judgment and sentence appealed are reversed with directions to grant defendant a new trial.

Reversed with directions.
# C_2023063EN.01000701.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Hauptzollamt Hamburg v Shell Deutschland Oil GmbH

(Case C-553/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2003/96/EC - Taxation of energy products and electricity - Fourth indent of Article 5 - Differentiated rates of excise duty according to whether those products are for business or non-business use - Optional tax exemptions and reductions - Submission of an application for an optional tax reduction after the expiry of the period prescribed for that purpose but before the expiry of the period for assessment of the tax concerned - Principle of legal certainty - Principle of effectiveness - Principle of proportionality)

(2023/C 63/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Hauptzollamt Hamburg

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Shell Deutschland Oil GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

The principle of effectiveness and the principle of proportionality, as a general principle of EU law, must be interpreted, in the context of implementing a provision such as that in the fourth indent of Article 5 of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity — which allows Member States to apply, under certain conditions, differentiated rates of taxation between business and non-business use, for energy products and electricity referred to in that directive — as precluding national legislation under which the competent authorities of a Member State are required to reject, automatically and without exception, an application for tax relief lodged within the period for assessment of the tax at issue as laid down in national law, on the sole ground that the applicant failed to comply with the period prescribed by that law for the submission of such an application.

---

(1)  OJ C 490, 6.12.2021.

---
# C_2021320EN.01001202.xml

| 9.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 31 March 2021 — TU and SU v BRD Groupe Société Générale S.A. and Next Capital Solutions Limited

(Case C-200/21)

(2021/C 320/15)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul București

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: TU and SU

Respondents: BRD Groupe Société Générale S.A. and Next Capital Solutions Limited

Question referred

Does Directive 93/13/EEC (1) preclude a rule of national law, such as that resulting from Article 712 et seq. of Chapter VI of the Code of Civil Procedure, which lays down a period of 15 days within which a debtor may, by way of an objection to enforcement, rely on the unfairness of a contractual term of the enforceable instrument, given that an action seeking to establish the existence of unfair terms in an enforceable instrument is not subject to any time limit and, in this connection, a debtor may seek suspension of enforcement of the instrument under Article 638(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure?

---

(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).

---
#### James E. STILL, Petitioner, v. RAMADA INN, SOUTH, and Florida Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. O-265.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 13, 1971.

Brownlee & Denius, Orlando, for petitioner.

Patrick H. Mears and Alex Littlefield, Jr., Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the denial of unemployment benefits to him is not supported by the evidence, nor that Respondent Industrial Relations Commission departed from essential requirements of law in entering the decision appealed herein.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ„ concur.
#### Lillie A. SKAGGS, Appellant, v. Orville J. SKAGGS, Appellee.

No. 71-147.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 17, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
### JAN-19-201 1 04:6 9 P H AIC S 1907874257 6 P . 0 2

ve s P.< X Bo x 123 1 . ;ia 3 Churc h Sircc L Wnuigci! . Alftslu

i 9^)92 9 VH.mrm^^^y S * Fa x (907)H7'^257 6 www.akics.orfl ; 

### ";\R[MENTO F .•J^;PORTATIO N ::' i OPERATION S

Januar y 19,2 0 U Th e Honorabl e RA

y LaHoo d Secretary U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 No w Jene y Avenue . S.fi . Washington . D.C . 2095 0 Re : Continuatio n o f

Alask aAirlines * EasentiB l Ai r Servic e a t Coivlovj) , Oustavus , Petersburg , Wrangell , an d Yakuta i Alaska , Docke t

OST-1998-489 9 Dea r Secretary LaHood : Thi s lette r

i s t o expres s th e suppor t o f Alask aIslan dCommunit y Service s (AICS ) for Alask a Airline s t o continu e providin g essentia l ai r servic e t o SoiUheas t

Alaska . AIC S i s acommunity-beise d Community Healtt

i Cente r locate di n Wrungcl l Alask atha t provide r acomprehensive , inlegrftUsdomi y o f primary care , dental , pharmaceutical , soda l an dbehaviora l health flervlces t o si x rura l islan dcommunitie s i n Southeas t Alaska

- AIC S utilize s th e essentia l ai r servic e provide dh y Alask aAirline s i n anumbe r o f ways . Fo r example , th e Tiddin o primar y car e clini c utilize s th e lervic e fo r transportinf

i test s t o outsid e IsbonUorie e andbringin g vifiiting phymoian specialist s int o th e communit y an dove r 22 5 Alaska n childre n dealin g wit h mental health Is^e s ayea r us e thi s servic e t o trave l t o AICS' s Crofuring RWildernes s Expedition s program . Hi e essentia l ai r

servic e prnvida

H b y Alnsk aAirlin^ u i s crudu l t o th e succesfiAil dail y operation s o f AIC S an dou r

continue dabilit y t o support th e healt h andwell"bcia g o f conununitie s i n Southeas t AlasloL A s such , AIC S respectfull y urge s th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n t o continu e providin g essentia l ai r service s t o Southeas t

Alask athroug h Alask aAirlines . Than k yo u to r you r oonsideration « Marie Walke r Executiv e Directo r Alask aIslan dCommunit y Service s
# C_2023015EN.01001201.xml

| 16.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — Harman International Industries Inc. v AB SA

(Case C-175/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 34 and 36 TFEU - Free movement of goods - Intellectual property - EU trade mark - Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 15 - Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark - Placing on the market within the European Economic Area (EEA) - Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark - Place of first marketing of products by the proprietor of the trade mark or with its consent - Proof - Directive 2004/48/EC - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Effective judicial protection - Operative part of judicial decisions not identifying the products covered - Difficulties in implementation - Restricted scope of action before the competent court for enforcement - Fair trial - Rights of the defence - Principle of the equality of arms)

(2023/C 15/11)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Harman International Industries Inc.

Defendant: AB SA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark, read in combination with the second sentence of Article 36 TFEU, Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. and Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights,

must be interpreted as

not precluding a judicial practice by which the operative part of the decision upholding an action for infringement of an EU trade mark is drafted in terms which, owing to their general nature, leaves it to the authority with competence to enforce that decision to determine the products to which that decision applies, provided that, in the context of the enforcement procedure, the defendant is permitted to contest the determination of the products covered by that procedure and that a court may examine and decide, in compliance with the provisions of Directive 2004/48, which products have in fact been placed on the market in the European Economic Area by the proprietor or with its consent.

---

(1)  OJ C 242, 21.6.2021.

---
#### RESORT PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Minnesota corporation, d/b/a Leisure Time Rentals, et al., Appellants, v. V. David LEAVIN, Appellee.

No. 73-1427.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 6, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
# Leadership Self-Assessment 

                - Title:  Leadership Self-Assessment  
                - Form #:         GSA720      
                - Current Revision Date:  08/2011
                - Authority or Regulation: 

PDF versions of forms use Adobe      ReaderTM.      Download Adobe ReaderTM

Search for another form

Print PageEmail Page

Top
#### In the Matter of Kyle Michael M., an Infant. Tammy Lynn A., Appellant; Roy S., Respondent.

[722 NYS2d 661]

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the petition of the biological mother and granting the cross petition of the biological father, each seeking to change the name of the parties’ infant son, without conducting a hearing to determine whether “the interests of the infant will be substantially promoted by the change” (Civil Rights Law § 63). The record is insufficient to establish whether either name change requested would substantially promote the *955interests of the infant, and thus we reverse the order and remit the matter to Supreme Court for a hearing on the petition and cross petition. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J. — Name Change.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Wisner, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.