alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,925,237
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,516,686
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    294,648
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,385,732
<PP&E>                                      22,876,549
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,332,664
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,694,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,330,058
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    339,407
<COMMON>                                     2,687,211
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,282,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,694,967
<SALES>                                     12,469,520
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,606,925
<CGS>                                       10,182,773
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,396,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (53,500)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,210,344
<INCOME-TAX>                                    89,354
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,120,990
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,120,990
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
Order entered June 27, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00094-CR

No. 05-18-00095-CR

No. 05-18-00096-CR

MATTHEW BARRETT O'SHEA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F15-51850-R, F15-75167-R & F15-75168-R

ORDER

Before the Court is the June 21, 2018 request of court reporter Debi Harris for an 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record in appellate cause number 05-18-00094-CR. We 

GRANT the request to the extent that we ORDER the reporter’s record in all three of the above 

appeals filed within TEN DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          29,029
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,083
<PP&E>                                           2,977
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   184,167
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,069
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (219)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,758
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,866
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,892
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,892
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .97



</TABLE>
State of California

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Addendum to the Final Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking

ADOPTION OF REGULATION FOR MOBILE CARGO HANDLIN G EQUIPMENT AT

PORTS AND INTERMODAL RAIL YARDS

Public Hearing Date: September 22 , 201 1 Agenda Item: 11

- 7

- 5 Addendum Prepared: September 1 4 , 2012

CORRECT ION TO TEST PROCEDURE

Explanation of the deletion of the test method from subsection (n):

The test method 40 CFR Part 94 (as amended in 2007) was removed from the list of test methods in subsection (n) of the CHE regulation to correct the error made by including it. This test method is applicable only to marine engines and not to the off

road engines used in CHE.

Regarding the deletion of one of the tests allowed to be used for demonstrating that certain equipment meet the applicable emission standards: “Testing conducted to meet the requirements for U.S. EPA certification of systems providing remanufacture to a

cleaner standard.” This testing is applicable to marine and locomotive engines and not

to the off

- road engines used in CHE. EPA has a certific ation program set up for the remanufacture of marine and locomotive engines, however it does not have a similar program set up for off

- road engines used in CHE. Consequently, this testing is not applicable to off

- road engines used in CHE and removing this test method does not modify the options available to the regulated community.

Pursuant to Govt. Code Section 11346.2(b)(7) , the Board found in the notice of

pro posed rulemaking discussion of C omparable Federal Regulations, tha t the regulation

does not duplicate or conflict with Federal law. Federal authority to regulate nonroad engines used in CHE is limited to new, while the CHE regulation addresses in

- use nonroad engines

.
#### STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellant, v. CONE BROTHERS CONTRACTING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

P-500.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 8, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 21, 1972.

Geoffrey B. Dobson and Barbara Ann McPherson, Tallahassee, for appellant.

J. Rex Farrior, Jr., of Shackleford, Far-rior, Stallings & Evans, Tampa, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

This Court has reviewed the record, briefs and heard oral argument, and we are of the opinion and so hold that the trial court did correctly construe the pertinent paragraphs of the Specifications in question, and that the appellant was bound, at least, by an implied warranty that the materials in question were suitable for the job which was the subject of the contract between appellant and appellee. The verdict and judgment are therefore affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and JOHNSON and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 64 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 64

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
  the important contributions of the men and women in the number one 
         industry of New York State, the agriculture industry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1993

 Mr. Solomon submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                      the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
  the important contributions of the men and women in the number one 
         industry of New York State, the agriculture industry.

Whereas October 17, 1993 is the 12th Annual Celebration of New York Agriculture 
        known as the New York State Farm Harvest Celebration;
Whereas agriculture is New York State's largest industry with an annual farm 
        value of almost $3,000,000,000;
Whereas New York's thirty-eight thousand five hundred farms provide employment 
        for some one hundred and thirteen thousand individuals and total in-
        State food employment reaches four hundred and twenty-five thousand;
Whereas a viable and strong agricultural industry is not only beneficial to New 
        York's farm and food industry, but to the economy of New York State, 
        hundreds of local communities and to all consumers in and out of New 
        York State;
Whereas New York State is a tremendous agricultural resource base with abundant 
        rainfall, productive soils, sufficient growing season and proximity to 
        the Nation's largest markets;
Whereas New York State is a leader in the production of a variety of products 
        such as dairy, cheese, apples, grapes, onions, potatoes, cabbage, sweet 
        corn, nursery plants, tart cherries, beets, and maple syrup for the 
        United States; and
Whereas New York farms are an important provider to the Nation of a variety of 
        agricultural goods such as cattle, eggs, green beans, lettuce, 
        cauliflower, celery, poultry, grain, hay, and others: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives, 
that we honor the important contributions of New York's farmers and 
other men and women in the New York State agriculture industry.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K, WHICH IS ATTACHED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000752634
<NAME>                        EARTH SEARCH SCIENCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         51,666
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               51,666
<PP&E>                                         4,020,376
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (179,916)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,951,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,521,217
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          517,845
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       68,531
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,029,141)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,951,914
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,281,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (305,297)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,549,823)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,549,823)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,549,823)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.04)
        


</TABLE>
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 20 2 3

- 1012 LT Case No. 20 16

- C A

- 1693

_____________________________
M ARLEN J ARAMILLO , as Personal Representative of the Estate of Osben Jaramillo
, Appellant,

v.

S AL T ARABOULOUS and S USAN T ARABOULO U S , Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County

. Dawn P. Fields
, Senior Judge

.
Brian J. Lee, of Morgan & Morgan, Jacksonville
, for Appellant.

Scot E. Samis, of Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP, St. Petersburg
, for Appellee s

. July 30, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
S OUD , B OATWRIGHT , and K ILBANE , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 129 (Thursday, July 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14432]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 26, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Robert L. Triplett III, Senior 
Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Independent Bank Group, Inc., McKinney, Texas; to acquire 
Guaranty Bancorp, and thereby indirectly acquire Guaranty Bank and 
Trust Company, both of Denver, Colorado.
    2. VBT Financial Corporation, San Antonio, Texas; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring Vantage Bank Texas, San Antonio, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 29, 2018.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-14432 Filed 7-3-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
No. 10851.

#### The Brown Manufacturing Co. *v.*Robinson et al.

Decided February 2, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Summit county.

*Messrs.**466Wilcox, *Parsons, Burch & Adams,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Grant, Sieber &*Mather, for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Davis and Price, JJ., concur.
#### Clifford Kenton SHOWERS, Appellant, v. The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellee.

No. 7647.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 2, 1937.

Elmer McClain, of Lima, Ohio, and Edgar W. Tait, of Urbana, Ohio, for appellant.

Vance Brand and G. V. Fromme, both of Urbana, Ohio, and Davis Harrison, of Indianapolis, Ind., for appellee.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This day the appeal of Clifford Kenton Showers, appellant, is hereby docketed and dismissed at the cost of the appellant.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 189

Honoring cultural achievements of the Voice of America.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1993

Mr. MICHEL (for himself and Mr. GILMAN) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

RESOLUTION

Honoring cultural achievements of the Voice of America.

Whereas the Voice of America is the global radio network of

the United States Government, seeking to promote understanding abroad for the United States, its people, culture, and policies;

Whereas the Voice of America’s charter calls upon it to provide consistently reliable and authoritative news, balanced

and comprehensive information about the United States,

and official pronouncements of the United States Government;

Whereas the Voice of America broadcasts are not directed to

audiences in the United States, so that most Americans

have no first-hand knowledge of the professionalism and

patriotism that are the hallmark of such broadcasts;
2

HRES 189 IH

Whereas the Voice of America tells America’s story to the

world on a daily basis, not only in terms of news and politics and policy, but also by reflecting the complexity, diversity, and excellence of American art and culture;

Whereas chief among our Nation’s indigenous art forms is

jazz;

Whereas since 1955, Willis Conover of Voice of America has

been broadcasting the best of American jazz to millions

around the world;

Whereas during that time, the music of Duke Ellington,

Charlie Parker, Ella Fitzgerald, Benny Goodman, Dizzy

Gillespie, and other great American artists, broadcast by

Mr. Conover, have come to symbolize the freedom and

creativity of democracy for those denied freedom; and

Whereas Mr. Conover has said ‘‘Jazz is a liberating kind of

music . . . every emotion—love, anger, joy, sadness—

can be communicated with the vitality and spirit that

characterizes our country at its best—which is of course

the same freedom that people everywhere should enjoy.’’:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives ap2 plauds the Voice of America for disseminating the very

3 best of American culture to those in other lands, exempli4 fied in the work of Willis Conover who for thirty-eight

5 years has made a unique and important contribution to

6 the cause of international understanding and good will.

Æ
AGENDA

• Part 1 – EPA statistical analysis

• Mercury NESHAP Floor• PM NESHAP Floor

• Part II – Holcim NESHAP Issues
EPA Analysis

• EPA statistical analysis – (reproduction of EPA Hg Floor) started out 

daily Hg emissions, applied variance adjus

and temporal corrections 

• EPA claims that the UPL can be used to 

convert any data to any frequency of compliance.

• See Table 1
Using 30-day Average

• Based on EPA’s analysis and EPA’s desire to esta

30-day limit – gives rise to following question 

– “How would the final floor differ if the Hg analysi

completed using 30

-day averages rather than dai

values?” 

• Using EPA analysis except all data represented a 30-day • The variance was recalculated for 30-day• The intra-quarry was changed from daily to 30-day ave• The temporal correction was also changed to 30-day
Using 30-day Average

• In this re-analysis m equals 1, because data is a

expressed as 30-day average and there is no neconvert from daily to 30-day

• Findings showed that using daily values 

underestimated the floor by 

-40%.

• Certainly EPA’s conclusions will be that’s an art

industry only likes it because it provides a high

• See Table 2
EPA Analysis

• Logic would suggest that either way sh

provide approximately the same floor. 

• Can EPA explain why using daily values 

be more appropriate than using 30-day when the limit will be based on a 30-daemission limit?
Used THC Data to Test EPA Appr

• In an effort to test this logical approach vs

approach, we used the THC data set 

• First we determine the actual 99th percent

five sources 

• Applied the UPL equation to each and in e

case the UPL underestimated the actual 9percentile
THC Data Results

• Final evaluation included analysis of the to

THC sources

– Determined the long term actual 99th percent

the five sources

– Created subset databases of 30, 60, 90, and 1

values

– These daily values underwent the same statis

analysis used by EPA for establishing the Hg flthe exception of the intra-quarry adjustment)

• Completed the analysis using 30-day rollin

averages to avoid the conversion from daidays as part of the UPL calculation
Findings of THC Analysis

UPL From Daily Values

30-day 30-Day ave Normal Log N

Rolling Ave. Actual 99th UPL (18.7) % Diff UPL (18.7) 

30 27.6 7.9 -71.4 3.7 60 27.6 6.5 -76.5 3.1 90 27.6 7.5 -72.7 4.9 

120 27.6 9.1 -66.9 5.0 

UPL starting out with 30day average

30-day 30-Day ave Normal

Rolling Ave. n Actual 99th UPL (18.7) % Diff

30 33 27.6 25.7 -6.7
Particulate Matter

• As part of PCA comments 

– we stated EPA did not utilize all available P

collected by the industry. 

• Industry contains approximately 150 kil• Each source has collected at least two 

tests (of three runs) since the NESHAP affected date.

• PM floor should include at least 18 sou

not 6 sources
Particulate Matter

• UPL approach is questionable

– Fact the conversion from daily to 30-day a

is flawed as shown by the THC validation

– High probability that one hour data conve

30-day averages will have the same results THC data