32686 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 135 / Friday, July 13, 2018 / Notices 

cause exists for amending [the NOI]’’ 

under Commission Rule 210.14(b), 19 

CFR 210.14(b). See ID at 2–3. 

Specifically, the ID reasons that 

‘‘[c]orrecting a clerical error constitutes 

good cause to amend [the NOI]’’ and 

that ‘‘Complainant did not improperly 

delay in bringing [the Motion].’’ See id. 

at 3. The ID also finds that ‘‘amending 

the [NOI] to add claim 30 will not 

prejudice Respondent’’ because ‘‘[t]he 

parties proceeded throughout discovery 

as if claim 30 was within the scope of 

the Investigation.’’ See id. at 4. 

No petition for review of the subject 

ID was filed. The Commission has 

determined not to review the ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: July 9, 2018. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14954 Filed 7–12–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1122] 

Certain Convertible Sofas and 

Components Thereof; Institution of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on June 

7, 2018, under section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of 

Sauder Manufacturing Company of 

Archbold, Ohio. A supplement to the 

complaint was filed on June 14, 2018. 

The complaint, as supplemented, 

alleges violations of section 337 based 

upon the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain convertible sofas 

and components thereof by reason of 

infringement of U.S. Design Patent No. 

716,576 (‘‘the ’576 patent’’). The 

complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by the applicable Federal 

Statute. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue 

limited exclusion order and a cease and 

desist order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katherine M. Hiner, The Office of 

Docket Services, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, telephone (202) 

205–1802. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

July 6, 2018, ORDERED THAT— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of products identified in 

paragraph (2) by reason of infringement 

of the claim of the ’576 patent; and 

whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘convertible sofas that 

include the unitary combination of two 

upholstered seating areas, each bordered 

on the lateral end with a vertical 

armrest, such areas being separated by 

a flat table member that can be placed 

substantially level with the seating areas 

as well as raised above the level of the 

seating areas to various degrees to 

provide an open space beneath the table 

and for the full width of the table. In 

addition, the sofa includes a full width, 

integral backrest that can be folded 

down on top of the seats and table to 

provide a sleep/rest surface’’; 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Sauder 

Manufacturing Company, 930 West 

Barre Road, Archbold, OH 43502. 

(b) The respondent is the following 

entity alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and is the party upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Krug, Inc., 111 Ahrens Street, Kitchener, 

Ontario, Canada N2C 1L5 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge; 

(5) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations will not be named as a 

party to this investigation. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondent in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of the respondent to file a 

timely response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 135 / Friday, July 13, 2018 / Notices 32687 

Issued: July 9, 2018. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14956 Filed 7–12–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[USITC SE–18–033] 

Government in the Sunshine Act 

Meeting Notice 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United 

States International Trade Commission. 

TIME AND DATE: July 19, 2018 at 11:00 

a.m. 

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 

(202) 205–2000. 

STATUS: Open to the public. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1. Agendas for future meetings: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Vote on Inv. Nos. 731–TA–1378 

and 1379 (Final) (Low Melt Polyester 

Staple Fiber from Korea and Taiwan). 

The Commission is currently scheduled 

to complete and file its determinations 

and views of the Commission by August 

1, 2018. 

5. Outstanding action jackets: None. 

In accordance with Commission 

policy, subject matter listed above, not 

disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 

may be carried over to the agenda of the 

following meeting. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: July 10, 2018. 

William Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2018–15106 Filed 7–11–18; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the 

Compresensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act 

On July 9, 2018, a proposed Consent 

Decree in Emhart Industries, et al. v. 

United States et al., Civil Action No. 

11–023, was filed with the United States 

District Court for Rhode Island. 

The proposed Consent Decree has 

been signed by the United States of 

America, the State of Rhode Island, 

Emhart Industries, Inc., and Black & 

Decker Inc. It will resolve the claims 

between the parties relating to the 

cleanup of the Centredale Manor 

Superfund Site in North Providence, 

Rhode Island under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 

U.S.C. 9601 et seq. The proposed 

Consent Decree requires Emhart and 

Black & Decker to undertake work to 

clean up the Centredale Site and to pay 

the United States’ and Rhode Islands’ 

costs. It also commits the United States 

to pay a portion of the cleanup costs on 

behalf of the Department of Defense. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

proposed Consent Decree. Comments 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, and should 

refer to: Emhart Industries et al. v. 

United States et al., Civil Action No. 

11–023, D.J. Ref. 90–11–3–07101/2. All 

comments must be submitted no later 

than thirty (30) days after the 

publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@

usdoj.gov. 

By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General, 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. 

Box 7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

During the public comment period, 

the proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined and downloaded at this 

Justice Department website: https://

www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. 

We will provide a paper copy of the 

proposed Consent Decree upon written 

request and payment of reproduction 

costs. Please mail your request and 

payment to: Consent Decree Library, 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611. 

Please enclose a check or money order 

for $183.75 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the United 

States Treasury. For a copy of the 

consent decree without appendices, 

send a check for $12.00. 

Robert Maher, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14973 Filed 7–12–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1110–0065] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Extension 

With Change, of a Previously 

Approved Collection 2013 Private 

Industry Feedback Survey 

AGENCY: Cyber Division, Federal Bureau 

of Investigation, Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation 

(FBI), Cyber Division (CyD) has 

submitted the following Information 

Collection Request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and clearance in accordance 

with the established review procedures 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for an additional days 

until August 13, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have additional comments 

especially on the estimated public 

burden or associated response time, 

suggestions, or need a copy of the 

proposed information collection 

instrument with instructions or 

additional information, please contact 

Stacy Stevens, Unit Chief, FBI, Cyber 

Division, 935 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 

Washington, DC 20535 (facsimile: 703– 

633–5797; email: slstevens2@fbi.gov) or 

Stacey Rubin, Management and Program 

Analyst, FBI, Cyber Division, 935 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 

20535 (facsimile: 703–633–5797; email: 

sjrubin@fbi.gov). Written comments 

and/or suggestions can also be directed 

to the Office of Management and 

Budget, Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, Attention 

Department of Justice Desk Officer, 

Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW, 

Washington, DC 20503 or sent to OIRA_

submissions@omb.eop.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES