alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.13





 Exhibit 10.13 

 
 



 
 October 22, 2012 
 Jeff
Walsh 
 34 Barbemon 
 Newport Coast, CA 92657 

Dear Jeff: 
 We are pleased to extend you the following offer with
loanDepot, LLC (“loanDepot”). 
  

	1.	 Position. Executive Vice President. You will report to Anthony Hsieh in this position.



  

	2.	 Compensation. $300,000 annually paid semi-monthly. 



 

	3.	 Bonus. You will be eligible to participate in the annual Management Incentive Plan with a target of up
to 100% of your base pay. Payout of 100% of your target can be achieved if established goals are met and the Company meets its goals as approved by the Board and as per the Management Incentive Plan. Personal objectives and goals or other components
of the bonus plan are to be discussed with Anthony Hsieh and all other loanDepot Management Incentive Plan criteria for payout will apply once approved. If your goals and the company goals exceed target, you will be eligible for additional bonus
consideration. 


  

	5.	 Equity. You are eligible to receive $2,000,000 equity value in loanDepot. This award to you will be
based on a valuation of $500,000,000 with a 5 year vesting schedule with acceleration upon change of control. For clarity, the shares are internal shares, not publically traded and would comport with loanDepot’s standard 2009 Incentive
Equity Plan terms. 


  

	6.	 Policies. You must abide by loanDepot’s policies and procedures, including all policies contained
in loanDepot’s Employee Handbook, which you can find on the Company intranet. 


  

	7.	 No Reliance. You acknowledge that you are not relocating your residence or resigning employment in
reliance on any promise or representation by loanDepot regarding the kind, character, or existence of such work, or the length of time such work will last, or the compensation therefore. 



 

	8.	 At Will. Your employment with loanDepot is at will, and either you or loanDepot may terminate the
employment relationship at any time with or without notice for any reason. No loanDepot representative has the authority to modify the at will nature of your employment except for the CEO of loanDepot, and any such modification must be in writing
signed by both you and the CEO of loanDepot. 















 



 
  


	9.	 Modification. loanDepot reserves the right to modify your position, duties, compensation, benefits,
and/or other terms and conditions of employment at any time in its sole discretion, as allowed by law, except for the at will employment policy. 


  

	10.	 Prior Verbal Agreements. This letter supersedes any prior verbal agreements or representations regarding
your employment with loanDepot. 


  

	11.	 Offer. If this offer is not accepted in writing within 3 days of the date of this letter, this offer
will be automatically revoked at that time. 


 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. 

Sincerely, 
 Anothy Hsieh 

CEO 
 Acknowledged. Accepted and Agreed by: 

 

					
	 /s/ Jeff Walsh
	 		  	Date: 10/24/12
	Signature	 		  	
			
	 Jeff Walsh
	 		  	
	Printed Name
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 495 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 495

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 29, 1994.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House a concurrent resolution waiving the requirement in section 
132 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 that the Congress adjourn sine 
die not later than July 31 of each year. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution to final adoption without 
intervening motion.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. No. DA 19
- 0614 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GARY HANSEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until April 18, 2022, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 15 2022

03/15/2022

Case Number: DA 19-0614
#### Williston JACKSON and Tyrone Reid, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 66-831, 66-832.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 3, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit No. 15

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Gerber Scientific, Inc.:





|Re: | Registration Statements on Form S-8,
|--- | ------------------------------------
|    | File No. 2-93695, No. 33-58668,     
|    | No. 333-26177, No. 333-42879,       
|    | No. 333-81447, No. 333-83463 and    
|    | No. 333-39754                       
|    |                                     
|    |                                     

With respect to the subject Registration Statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated August 24, 2005 related to our review of interim financial information.



Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act, such reports are not considered a part of a Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

/ s / KPMG LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
August 24, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      17,612,177
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,773,778
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 86,911,305
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    322,762,293
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,424,847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             454,709,695
<DEPOSITS>                                 400,337,675
<SHORT-TERM>                                 8,376,472
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          5,155,313
<LONG-TERM>                                  8,281,449
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       200,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,358,786
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             454,709,695
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             27,261,734
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,612,478
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               725,679
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            33,599,891
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          16,595,417
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          17,426,105
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       16,173,786
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  834,140
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               7,509
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             14,901,551
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,885,330
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,458,986
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,458,986
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.79
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.27
<LOANS-NON>                                    565,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   470,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,209,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                1,230,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    83,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,425,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,425,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
No. 10925.

#### Jones, Exr., et al. *v.*Fronfield et al.

Decided October 20, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Jackson county.

*Messrs McGillivray & Armstrong,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. C. S. Mauk*and *Mr. Timothy S. Hogan,*for defendants *436in error.

Judgment modified and cause remanded to the court of common pleas for further proceedings according to law. Grounds stated in journal entry.

This court being of opinion that the circuit court, in an error case, has not power to make' a finding of facts which calls for review by this court, or conclusively binds the court of common pleas, nor to render final judgment except in a case of a finding of controlling facts by the trial court, or they are conceded, it is considered and adjudged that the said judgment of the circuit court be modified as follows: As to the finding of facts therein contained the said judgment is reversed and the said judgment reversing the judgment of the court of common pleas and remanding said cause to said court for further proceedings is affirmed, and said cause is ordered remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Jackson county for further proceedings according to law.

Shauck, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### THE STATE, use of Derrickson, et. al. *vs.*EBE WALTER, Executor of ARTHUR WEST, deceased.

A bequest of the proceeds of the sale of lands to a church is *void.*

Debt on an administration bond. Case stated.

The case stated set forth, that Arthur West died in the year 1831, having duly made his last will and testament, wherein, after sundry *152legacies, he directed that all his lands, and all the residue of his personal estate, should be sold within six months after his decease, at public vendue for cash; and, after all his just debts should be fully-satisfied, that the residue or balance of the money shall be equally divided between the three Methodist churches, namely: Antioch, Salem and the Head of the Sound church. And he appointed the said Ebe Walter his executor. That after payment of debts there remained for distribution under the residuary clause, the sum of $501-03. The cestuis que use are the heirs at law of Arthur West.

The question stated was “ is the residuary bequest of the balance of the money of the estate of the testator, composed as that balance is, entirely of the proceeds of the sale of the real estate of the testator’s land, to the three churches of Antioch, Salem, and the Head of the Sound, a void bequest. And if so, does that balance go to the heirs at law of the testator? If the court are of opinion that the bequest is void, and that the balance should go over to the heirs at law of the testator, then judgment to be entered for plaintiff; but if the court should be of opinion that the said bequest is valid, then judgment to be entered for defendant.

*C. G. Ridgely,*for plaintiff.

*Thomas Robinson, jr.,*for defendant.

*The Court,*

without hearing argument, gave judgment for plaintiff, on the authority of the lesse of *Furguson, et. al.*vs. *Hedges,*1 *Harr. Rep, 524,*and *The State use of Wiltbank, et. al.*vs. *Wiltbank’s administrator,*(ante p. 18.)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                                                          Exhibit 12



                                                                                   The Gillette Company

                                                                             Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                              Three months     Three months
Dollars in millions                              ended            ended
                                              March 31, 2004   March 31, 2003       2003       2002       2001       2000       1999
                                             ---------------  ---------------      -----      -----      -----      -----      -----
<S>                                                   <C>               <C>       <C>       <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>
Earnings:
 Income from continuing operations before
 income taxes                               $            530              376      1,964      1,752      1,342      1,288      1,912
       Interest expense                                   12               14         54         84        145        223        136
       Interest portion of rental expense                 10               11         41         43         31         25         20
       Amortization of capitalized interest                2                3         10         10          9          6          5

                                                       -----            -----      -----      -----      -----      -----      -----
       Earnings available for fixed charges $            554              404      2,069      1,889      1,527      1,542      2,073
                                                       =====            =====      =====      =====      =====      =====      =====

Fixed Charges:
       Interest expense                     $             12               14         54         84        145        223        136
       Interest capitalized                                1                1          2          4         11         23         13
       Iterest portion of rental expense                  10               11         41         43         31         25         20

                                                       -----            -----      -----      -----      -----      -----      -----
       Total fixed charges                  $             23               26         97        131        187        271        169
                                                       =====            =====      =====      =====      =====      =====      =====



Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                      24.1             15.5       21.4       14.5        8.2        5.7       12.3
                                                       =====            =====      =====      =====      =====      =====      =====

</TABLE>
#### H. L. COBLE CONSTRUCTION CO., a North Carolina corporation, and Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Petitioners, v. The CITY OF ORLANDO, a municipal corporation, Respondent.

No. 44503.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 17, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 4, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 282 So.2d 25.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1
<PAGE>



                        [Neff & Company, LLP letterhead]




                       Consent of Independent Accountants



Board of Directors
GFSB Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
333-07131)  on Form S-8 of GFSB  Bancorp,  Inc. of our report  dated  August 14,
1998,  relating to the  consolidated  statement of  financial  condition of GFSB
Bancorp,  Inc. as of June 30, 1998, and the related  consolidated  statements of
earnings,  changes in  stockholders'  equity and cash flows for the year  ending
June 30, 1998,  which report  appears in the June 30, 1998 annual report on Form
10-KSB of GFSB Bancorp, Inc.



                                            /s/ Neff & Company, LLP

   
^October 7, 1998
Albuquerque, New Mexico
EXHIBIT
10.2


 





 


March
11, 2021


 


 


Petroleum
Independent & Exploration LLC


25025
I-45 North, Suite 420


The
Woodlands, TX 77380


 


		Re:	That
                                         certain warrant to purchase up to 2,625,000 shares of Common Stock of Empire Petroleum
                                         Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), represented by Common
                                         Share Warrant Certificate No. PIE-1 issued on August 6, 2020 (the “PIE-1 Warrant
                                         Certificate”) to Petroleum Independent & Exploration LLC, a Nevada limited
                                         liability company (“PIE”)



 


That
certain warrant to purchase up to 1,800,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company represented by Common Share Warrant Certificate
No. PIE-2 issued on August 6, 2020 (the “PIE-2 Warrant Certificate”) to PIE


 


That
certain warrant to purchase up to 8,136,518 shares of Common Stock of the Company represented by Common Share Warrant Certificate
No. PIE-3 issued on August 6, 2020 (the “PIE-3 Warrant Certificate”) to PIE


 


That
certain warrant to purchase up to 11,066,667 shares of Common Stock of the Company represented by Common Share Warrant Certificate
No. PIE-4 issued on August 6, 2020 (the “PIE-4 Warrant Certificate” and, collectively with the PIE-1 Warrant Certificate,
the PIE-2 Warrant Certificate, and the PIE-3 Warrant Certificate, the “PIE Warrant Certificates”) to PIE


 


Ladies
and gentlemen:


 


For
valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and PIE hereby agree to amend the
Warrant Certificates as follows:


 


1.       The
references to the Vesting Event (as defined in the PIE-2 Warrant Certificate) in the PIE-2 Warrant Certificate is hereby removed.
For the avoidance of doubt, as of the date first set forth above, the PIE-2 Warrant Certificate shall be immediately exercisable
in full in accordance with the terms and conditions described therein as amended by this letter.


 


2.       All
payments of Exercise Price (as defined in the Warrant Certificates) shall be made to and used by the Company.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and PIE have caused this amendment to the Warrant Certificates to be duly executed and attested,
all as of the day and year first above written.


 


EMPIRE
PETROLEUM CORPORATION


 


By:  /s/
Michael R. Morrissett         


Name: Michael R. Morrissett


Title:
President


 


 


By:  /s/
Thomas W. Pritchard          


Name:
Thomas W. Pritchard


Title:
CEO


 


 


 


Acknowledged
and agreed this 11th day of March, 2021.


 


PETROLEUM
INDEPENDENT & EXPLORATION LLC


 


 


By:  /s/
Phil E.
Mulacek                 



Name:
Phil E. Mulacek


Title:
Manager
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           31280
<SECURITIES>                                      8398
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 45263
<PP&E>                                           27692
<DEPRECIATION>                                     559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   72504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5922
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        100317
<OTHER-SE>                                     (33820)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     72504
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   912
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (888)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (888)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (888)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Luna, Appellant.

[655 NYS2d 933]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Roberts, J.), rendered on or about January 30, 1995, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Tom and Andrias, JJ.
# C_2020247EN.01002401.xml

| 27.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/24

---

Action brought on 7 May 2020 — MKB Multifunds v Commission

(Case T-277/20)

(2020/C 247/34)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: MKB Multifunds BV (Zierikzee, Netherlands) (represented by: J. van de Hel en R. Rampersad, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Commission of 27 February 2020 concerning State aid SA.55704 (2019/FC) — The Netherlands — Alleged aid related to the Dutch Venture Initiative (‘DVI’); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Commission of 27 February 2020 concerning State aid SA.55704 (2019/FC) — The Netherlands — Alleged aid related to the Dutch Venture Initiative (‘DVI’);

| — | order the Commission to reopen its investigation; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to reopen its investigation;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the applicant puts forward three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea: the Commission erred in determining that the investments of DVI, a fund-of-funds structure, in private equity funds were market conform. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea: the Commission erred in determining that the investments of DVI, a fund-of-funds structure, in private equity funds were market conform.

| 2. | Second plea: the Commission erred in determining that the overall fee structure of the European Investment Fund (EIF) was in line with the fee structure of a comparable market operator of fund-of-funds. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea: the Commission erred in determining that the overall fee structure of the European Investment Fund (EIF) was in line with the fee structure of a comparable market operator of fund-of-funds.

| 3. | Third plea: the Commission erred in determining that the investment by the Netherlands Government in DVI’s fund-of-funds structure was market conform. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea: the Commission erred in determining that the investment by the Netherlands Government in DVI’s fund-of-funds structure was market conform.

---