alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Magnetek, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Andrew G. Galef, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David
P. Reiland, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or
Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | /s/ ANDREW G. GALEFAndrew G. Galef
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ DAVID P. REILANDDavid P. Reiland
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer      

Dated: September 10, 2004

---



QuickLinks
# C_2023164EN.01001102.xml

| 8.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije — Slovenia) — SOMEO S.A., formerly PEARL STREAM S.A. v Republika Slovenija

(Case C-725/21, (1) SOMEO)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs Union - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Subheading 9401 90 80 - Parts of seats for motor vehicles - Net for making pockets in the rear part of seats - Protection for the inside of seats)

(2023/C 164/15)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SOMEO S.A., formerly PEARL STREAM S.A.

Defendant: Republika Slovenija

Operative part of the judgment

Heading 9401 of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the versions resulting from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1101/2014 of 16 October 2014, from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1754 of 6 October 2015, and from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1821 of 6 October 2016,

must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘parts’ of a seat of a motor vehicle does not cover goods which are not indispensable for such a seat to fulfil its function.

---

(1)  OJ C 109, 7.3.2022.

---
EXHIBIT NO. 15

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Gerber Scientific, Inc.:





|Re: | Registration Statements on Form S-8,
|--- | ------------------------------------
|    | File No. 2-93695, No. 33-58668,     
|    | No. 333-26177, No. 333-42879,       
|    | No. 333-81447, No. 333-83463 and    
|    | No. 333-39754                       
|    |                                     
|    | Registration Statement on Form S-3, 
|    | File No. 33-58670                   
|    |                                     

With respect to the subject Registration Statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated August 27, 2003 related to our review of interim financial information.



Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act, such reports are not considered a part of a Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

/ s / KPMG LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
September 11, 2003
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION(Not filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned, Larry C. Oldham, the President and Chief Executive Officer ofParallel Petroleum Corporation (“Parallel”), hereby certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Parallel for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the periodic reportingrequirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained inthat Form 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Parallel.Dated:February 28, 2007         /s/ Larry C. Oldham   Larry C. Oldham,   President and Chief Executive Officer        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toParallel Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Parallel Petroleum Corporation and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Jan 2021
H. Res. 512

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

August 11, 1994.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4907) to reform the concept of baseline budgeting. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived.

General debate shall be confined to the bill and the amendments made in order by this resolution and shall not exceed

one hour, with thirty minutes equally divided and controlled

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Rules and thirty minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on Government Operations. After general debate

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original

bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule

the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by
2

HRES 512 EH

the Committee on Rules now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. No other amendment shall be in order except

those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each amendment may be offered only

in the order printed, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, and shall

not be subject to amendment. All points of order against the

amendments printed in the report are waived. If more than

one of the amendments printed in the report is adopted, only

the last to be adopted shall be considered as finally adopted

and reported to the House. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendment as may have been

finally adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the

nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and any amendment thereto to
3

HRES 512 EH

final passage without intervening motion except one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
FALCON SERVICE BULLETIN ADVISORY 

1/2 

DASSAULT AVIATION 

SERVICE BULLETIN : F50-A515 DATE: October 12, 2010 

ATA CHAPTER: 32 COVERED MOD: None 

TITLE: LANDING GEAR - BRAKE SYSTEM – EMERGENCY BRAKE 

SYSTEM INSTALLATION CHECK 

EFFECTIVITY: S/N 2 through 352

REASON: On two occurrences on MYSTERE-FALCON 50 in-service aircraft, it was detected that 

two pipes of the emergency brake system #2 located near the nose landing gear 

bearing were swapped. 

The swapping of these two pipes implies that when L/H brake pedal is depressed, the 

R/H brake unit is activated, and conversely, when the R/H brake pedal is depressed, 

the L/H brake unit is actuated. 

The purpose of this Service Bulletin is to check that the two pipes are correctly installed 

and make sure that the two pipes cannot be swapped during reinstallation after a 

maintenance operation. 

Corrosion Prevention Cockpit/Operations Improvements 

Dispatch Reliability Cabin Comfort 

Operational Availability 

Damage Prevention 

New Technology 

New Regulations 

CRITERIA:

Manufacturer’s Suggested 

DESCRIPTION: This Service Bulletin is divided into two sections: 

• SECTION F50-515-1: the operation consists in checking that the two pipes are not 

 swapped. This section requires two operators. 

• SECTION F50-515-2: the operation consists in painting the ends of the pipes and 

 unions with different colors to identify the pipes. 

RELATED SB’s: None 

COMPLIANCE: Mandatory as per EASA Emergency Airworthiness Directive 

No 2010-0208-E. 

- for Section F50-515-1 before the next flight unless an alternate 

check has been performed by the flight crew in accordance with 

the EASA Emergency Airworthiness Directive.

- for Section F50-515-2 during the next “A” inspection.

- 

LABOR-HRS 

ALLOWANCE: 

Section F50-515-1: 0.5 hour 

Section F50-515-2: 1 hour 

Note : labor hours concern only the work described in this Service Bulletin and do not include other 

maintenance work which may be performed on this occasion. 

MATERIAL INFORMATION: Excluding locally procured material. 

PART NUMBER TO ORDER QTY 2010 VAT FREE UNIT 

PRICE (US$) REMARKS 

None 
FALCON SERVICE BULLETIN ADVISORY 

2/2 

COMMERCIAL PROGRAM: N/A 

FALCONCARE PROGRAM: N/A 

TO ORDER, CONTACT YOUR DASSAULT FALCON SPARES ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE

Prices are subject to change without notice
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q of Golden West Financial Corporation for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, each of the undersigned, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | such Form 10-Q of Golden West Financial Corporation for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in such Form 10-Q of Golden West Financial Corporation for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Golden West Financial Corporation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |  |  |                                                  
|----------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|            |  | 
|May 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Herbert M. Sandler                           
|Date        |  |  |  | Herbert M. Sandler                               
|            |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|            |  |  |  | Golden West Financial Corporation                
|            |  | 
|May 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Marion O. Sandler                            
|Date        |  |  |  | Marion O. Sandler                                
|            |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|            |  |  |  | Golden West Financial Corporation                
|            |  | 
|May 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Russell W. Kettell                           
|Date        |  |  |  | Russell W. Kettell                               
|            |  |  |  | President and Chief Financial Officer            
|            |  |  |  | Golden West Financial Corporation
# Offense/Incident Report

                - Title:  Offense/Incident Report 
                - Form #:         GSA3155      
                - Current Revision Date:  Obsolete
                - Authority or Regulation:  
                - Special Instructions:             This form was transferred to Dept of Homeland Security,  http://www.dhs.gov 

PDF versions of forms use Adobe      ReaderTM.      Download Adobe ReaderTM

Search for another form

Print PageEmail Page

Top
Order entered April 17, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 00130 - CV KELLEY|WITHERSPOON, LLP, ET AL. , Appellant s V. ARMSTRONG INTERNATIO NAL SERVICES, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 11 - 01907 - E 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellee/cross

- appellant’s April 16, 2014 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file its initial brief. Under our local rules, appellee/cross

- appellant must file
a combined appellee’s and cross

- appellant’s brief. See 5th Tex. App. (Dallas) Loc. R. 10(1)(b). Appellee’s combined brief will be due thirty days after appellant’s brief is filed. See 5th Tex. App. (Dallas) Loc. R. 10 (3)(b) . Accordingly, we DENY appelle e/cross

- appellant’s motion as premature. /s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section

906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Burt Sugarman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the first quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (Quarterly Report) of GIANT GROUP, LTD. (Registrant) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
and that information contained in such Quarterly Report presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Dated: May 14, 2004



|       |  |                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/    Burt Sugarman                 
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Evans SMALL, Petitioner, v. Willie BRYANT, Respondent.

No. 42179.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 19, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 258 So.2d 459.

ROBERTS, C. J., and BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ADKINS, J., dissents.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 432

Requiring the House of Representatives to take any legislative action necessary to verify the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment as

a part of the Constitution, when the legislatures of an additional 3

States ratify the Equal Rights Amendment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 23, 1994

Mr. ANDREWS of New Jersey (for himself, Mrs. BYRNE, Mr. ANDREWS of

Maine, Ms. SCHENK, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. DEUTSCH, and Mr.

HOCHBRUECKNER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Requiring the House of Representatives to take any legislative action necessary to verify the ratification of the

Equal Rights Amendment as a part of the Constitution,

when the legislatures of an additional 3 States ratify

the Equal Rights Amendment.

1 Resolved, That, when the legislatures of an additional

2 3 States ratify the Equal Rights Amendment, the House

3 of Representatives shall take any legislative action nec4 essary to verify the ratification of the Equal Rights

5 Amendment as a part of the Constitution.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7552
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TONY DEANGELO MCLAUGHLIN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Wallace W. Dixon, Magistrate Judge. (CR-02-251; CA-04-892-2) Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 3, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tony Deangelo McLaughlin, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tony Deangelo McLaughlin seeks to appeal the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, issued on September 13, 2005. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order McLaughlin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Harry Vernon CHRISTNER, Appellant, v. Philip Leonidas CUMMINS and Allstate Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. 72-234.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alex Cruz, Appellant.

[655 NYS2d 763]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Elbert Hinkson, J.), rendered June 14, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 21/s to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly enhanced defendant’s promised sentence where defendant violated the conditions of the plea. Defendant’s current contention that, having never warned defendant of the possibility of an enhanced sentence, the court was obligated to offer him the opportunity to withdraw the plea, is unpreserved and without merit *(People v Berdecia,*223 AD2d 444). Moreover, an enhanced sentence, with no option to withdraw the plea, was independently justified by the fact that defendant obtained a favorable plea bargain through the use of false pedigree information *(see, People v Costello,*231 AD2d 446). We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Milonas and Tom, JJ.
June 11, 2012

Ms. Aloha Ley Small Community Air Service Development Program US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20303

OST

- 2012

- 0069 Pangborn Memorial Airport (Wenatchee, WA)

Dear Aloha :

SeaPort Airlines is writi ng this letter to convey our strong support of Pangborn Memorial Airport ’s application for a grant under the Small Community Air Service Development (SCASD) Program.

On March 1, 2012 SeaPort initiated service at Wenatchee . This created, for the first time in many years,

a service level of more than one airline and more than one nonstop destination . As a result, we believe

that the limited historical service levels resulted in a large percentage of potential travelers using airports, primarily Spokane and Seattle

. While we are very pleased with the early results of our Wenatchee service, it is not yet profitable on a fully

- allocated basis.

The funds that Pangborn Memorial Airport and its community partners are requesting will help to ensur e travelers in the Wenatchee area are aware of the greater choices now available at their “hometown” airport , as well as increase awareness in the Portland area of the great tourism offerings in the

Wenatchee region

. Finally , we believe the benefits of the marketing program would extend beyond our
own service and equally benefit the long

- standing service offered by Horizon Air.

F or these reasons, we urge you to strongly considering awarding Pangborn Memorial Airport their request for SCASD marketing funds. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have.

Respectfully,

Timothy F. Sieber

VP

– Strategy & Corpo rate Development
emma-ex1026_1513.htm



                                        Exhibit 10.26   

 

Amendment for Distribution Agreement on June 15, 2017

between Emmaus Life Sciences Inc. and Telcon Inc.

 

 

Emmaus Life Sciences Inc.와 Telcon Inc.는 2017년 6월15일 체결된 Distribution Agreement 중 하기와 같이 내용을 수정 또는 추가함을 합의 한다. 

Emmaus Life Sciences Inc. and Telcon Inc. agree to amend or add to the following content in the Distribution Agreement on June 15, 2017.

 

1. II. 의무에서 다음 16항을 추가한다. 

Add the following Paragraph 16 to the obligation.

   “16. “제조자”는 부록 A 상 상품에 대해서신약등록을 위한 3차임상TEST를 시작하고, FDA로부터 승인을 받아야만 한다. 제조자가 2017년7월에 FDA 승인받은 신약 ENDARI의 유사적응증으로 임상3차만 하면 신약을 신청 할 수 있다.

“16. The "manufacturer" must commence a third clinical trial for new drug registration for the products in Appendix A and obtain approval from the FDA. It is possible to apply for a new drug only after the third phase of clinical trials,because it is similar to ENDARI, a new drug approved by the FDA in July 2017.”

 

2. X. 계약기간/계약해제/환불불가 지불액에서 1항을 다음과 같이 수정한다. 

계약기간/계약해지/환불불가/지불액에서 제1항을 다음과 같이 수정한다.

 

 



2. In the term of a contract/ cancellation / non-refundable payment (X), Section 1 shall be amended as follows.

“1. 본 계약은 발효일로부터 효력을 발생하며 상품등록이 완료된 시점부터 2년간 유효하다. 30일전 서면통지로 해지하지 않으면 자동 1년씩 연장된다.” 

“1. This Agreement shall become effective from the effective date and shall be valid for two (2) years from the date the product registration on FDA is completed. If not canceled by written notice 30 days ago, it will be automatically extended by one year.

 

3. 2. “X.계약기간/계약해제/환불불가 지불액에서 3항에서 다음 (d)를 추가한다.

3. 2. “Add the following (d) in Section 3 of the term of a contract/ cancellation / non-refundable payment (X).

 “(d) “제조자”가 II조16항의 의무를 위반하는 경우 발효일로부터 (3) 년 이내에 판매점은 본 계약을 해지할 수 있다.” 

In the event that the "Manufacturer" breaches the obligations of Article II Section 16, the distributor may terminate this contract within three years from the effective date.

 

4. XIII 보상에서  2항에서 다음 (f)를 추가한다. 

   In paragraph 2 of the compensation (XIII), the following (f) is added.

“ (f)  “제조자”가 FDA 승인을 받지 못하여 “판매점”이 X조 3에 따라 판매점이 본 계약을 해지하면 “제조자”는 II 1 에 따라 수령한 금액과 기타 발생한 손해를 배상한다.”

If the "manufacturer" is not approved by the FDA and the "distributor" terminates agreement under Article X Section 3, the "manufacturer" shall reimburse the amount received .

 

 



계약당사자는 2부를 발행하여 각1부씩 보관한다.

The parties to the contract shall issue two copies and keep one copy each.

 

2018년 01월11일

January 11, 2018

 

 

“EMMAUS LIFE SCIENCES INC”

BY:   /s/ WILLIS C LEE

NAME: WILLIS C LEE

TITLE : COO/VICE CHAIRMAN

 

 

“TELCON INC”

BY: /s/ Ji Hoon Kim

NAME: Ji Hoon Kim

TITLE: CEO