alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                    LEWIS GALOOB TOYS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
                          (in thousands, except ratios)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Years ended December 31,
                                                ------------------------
                               1995          1994          1993            1992        1991 
                               ----          ----          ----            ----        ----
<S>                          <C>           <C>           <C>             <C>         <C>     
Net earnings (loss)          $ 9,399       $18,424       $(10,924)       $(2,447)    $(7,540)
Income tax                       600           778              9            238          --
                             -------       -------       --------        -------     -------
Charge (credit)                9,999        19,202        (10,915)        (2,209)     (7,540)
                             -------       -------       --------        -------     -------
Fixed charges:
Interest expense               3,429         2,609          1,836          1,550       1,775
Portion of rental expense        663           505            483            613         728
                             -------       -------       --------        -------     -------
Total fixed charges            4,092         3,114          2,319          2,163       2,503
                             -------       -------       --------        -------     -------
Earnings (loss) before
   income taxes and fixed
   charges                   $14,091       $22,316       $ (8,596)       $   (46)    $(5,037)
                             =======       =======       ========        =======     =======

Preferred dividends
   requirements              $ 3,127(B)    $ 3,127(B)    $  3,127(B)     $ 3,127     $ 3,127

Ratio of pretax income
   to net income                1.06          1.04           1.00           1.00        1.00
                             -------       -------       --------        -------     -------
Preferred dividends
   factored                    3,315         3,252          3,127          3,127       3,127

Total fixed charges            4,092         3,114          2,319          2,163       2,503
                             -------       -------       --------        -------     -------
Total fixed charges and
   preferred dividends       $ 7,407       $ 6,366       $  5,446        $ 5,290     $ 5,630
                             =======       =======       ========        =======     =======
Ratio of earnings to
   fixed charges and
   preferred dividends          1.90          3.51             (A)            (A)         (A)
                             =======       =======       ========        =======     =======
</TABLE>

(A)  Earnings are inadequate to cover fixed charges and preferred dividends in
1993, 1992, and 1991.

(B)  Includes Preferred Stock dividends in arrears.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 569 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 569

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the work of 
      grassroots organizations should not be considered lobbying.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 1994

  Mr. Lewis of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Sam Johnson of 
   Texas, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. Canady, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Talent, Mr. 
 Ehlers, and Mr. Lucas), submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the work of 
      grassroots organizations should not be considered lobbying.

Whereas grassroots organizing and political participation is one of the truest 
        expressions of democracy; and
Whereas lobbying reform legislation may have the unintended effect of infringing 
        on the constitutional rights of citizens who participate in the 
        political system at the grassroots level: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the 104th Congress should take actions necessary to ensure that any 
lobbying reform legislation does not consider the grassroots work of 
organizations to be lobbying.
                                 <all>
```
## Tronox Pigments (Savannah), Inc. BART Exemption Modeling Stack Data 

# I I I UTM East UTM North 

# I Stack Height 

# I Stack Diameter 

# I ExhaustVelocity 

# I Exhaust Temperature 

# I Exhaust Flow

Note: The "Chloride Finishing LineATanks" and "Chloride Finishing Line BTanks" exhaust through the same stack. The "Chloride Finishing Line BTanks" are not a BART-eligiblesource.

Tronox 

# - BART Exemption Modeling Data.xls Stack Data

### Tronox Pigments (Savannah), Inc. BART Exemption Modeling Emission Source Data

Stack ID Sources PMIO H2S04

SulfuricAcid Plant 0.174 

### See Notes 0.15 Notes: The emissionsfrom "Chloride Finishing Line A Tanksnand "Chloride Finishing Line B Tanks" exhaust through the same stack. The "Chloride Finishing Line 

### BTanks" are not a BART-eligible source. Emissions data for the "Chloride Finishing Line B Tanks" are providedfor information purposes only, and should not be incorporated into the BART exemption modeling runs for Stack ID 1024. Forthe Chloride Finishing Line A Tanks, PMI0 emissions are conservatively assumed to be equal to PM emissions. PM emissions were estimated by scaling the PM emissions data reported inthe annual emission statement for calendar year 2003. For the SulfuricAcid Plant, NOx emissions are estimated based on an emission factor used inthe annual emission statements. For the Sulfuric Acid Plant, SO2 and H2S04emissions are estimated based on the emission standards specified in 40 CFR 60 Subpart H (Standards of Performance for SulfuricAcid Plants). The emission standards for SO2 and H2S04are 4.0 lblton and 0.15 Iblton, respectively. For the SulfuricAcid Plant, it is assumed that PMI0 emissions are equal to H2S04emissions. For modeling purposes, emissions of PMlO and H2S04 are not additive.

Tronox 

# - BART Exemption Modeling Data.xls Emission Source Data
# C_2022051EN.01001801.xml

| 31.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social n.o 1 de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 20 September 2021 — NC v BA, DA, DV and CG

(Case C-583/21)

(2022/C 51/23)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social n.o 1 de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: NC

Defendants: BA, DA, DV and CG

Question referred

Does Article 1(1)(a) of Council Directive (EC) 2001/23 of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses, (1) and consequently the contents of the directive, apply to a situation in which the notary in post in a notary’s office — who is both a public official and also the private-sector employer of the office’s employees, with the employment relationship being governed by general employment legislation and by a sectoral Collective Agreement — succeeds the outgoing post-holder, takes on the previous notary’s Protocol, continues to provide services at the same place of work using the same material facilities, and takes on the staff who had worked for the previous notary who had held that post?

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 82, p. 16.

---
Exhibit 31.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Mary G. Merritt, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Preferred Voice,
      Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this quarterly report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      quarterly report.

4.    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
      registrant and I have:

      a.    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
            material information relating to the registrant, including its
            consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
            those entities, particularly during the period in which this
            quarterly report is being prepared;

      b.    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
            of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c.    presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my
            evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
      auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors
      (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a.    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
            controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
            identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
            internal controls; and

      b.    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal controls; and

6.    I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
      significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
      significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
      recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

/s/ Mary G. Merritt
-------------------
Mary G. Merritt
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer
  and Principal Financial Officer)
February 14, 2006
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Pearson plc (the Company) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Fallon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 26, 2015



/s/ John FallonJohn FallonChief Executive Officer
#### Curtis Fern COOPER, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42215.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 24, 1972.

Curtis Fern Cooper, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

The petitioner in the above cause has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Upon consideration it is ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby denied without prejudice to proceed in the trial court to seek, upon proper showing of in-digency, appointment of counsel to represent him in any appellate review including that by way of habeas corpus1 in the First District Court of Appeal, notwithstanding the district court’s sua sponte treatment of petitioner’s pro se assignments of error as a petition for a delayed appeal.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ, concur.

1

. Baggett v. Wainwright, 229 So.2d 239 (Fla.1969).
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 518

Returning to the Senate the Senate amendments to the bill H.R. 4554,

making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and

Drug Administration, and related agencies programs for the fiscal year

ending Septemeber 30, 1995.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1994

Mr. GIBBONS submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Returning to the Senate the Senate amendments to the bill

H.R. 4554, making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural

Development, Food and Drug Administration, and related agencies programs for the fiscal year ending

Septemeber 30, 1995.

1 Resolved, That Senate amendment No. 83 to the bill

2 H.R. 4554 making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural

3 Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Relat4 ed Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September

5 30, 1995, and for other purposes, in the opinion of this

6 House, contravenes the first clause of the seventh section

7 of the first article of the Constitution of the United States
2

HRES 518 ATH

1 and is an infringement of the privileges of this House and

2 that such bill with the Senate amendments thereto be re3 spectfully returned to the Senate with a message commu4 nicating this resolution.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                STATE OR JURISDICTION   TYPE OF
SUBSIDIARY OR PARTNERSHIP                          OF INCORPORATION     INTEREST          % OWNED          OWNED BY
-------------------------                       ---------------------   --------          -------         ----------
<S>                                             <C>                     <C>               <C>             <C>
Chicago Miniature Optoelectronic                     Delaware              C               100%           SLI, Inc.
   Technologies, Inc. ("CMOT")
Chicago Miniature Lamp (Canada) Inc.                 Ontario               C               100            CMOT
IDI Internacional S.A.                               Costa Rica            C               100            CMOT
Chicago Miniature Lamp - Sylvania                    Delaware              C               100            SLI
   Lighting International, Inc. ("CML-SLI")
SLI Lighting Products, Inc. ("SLP")                  Delaware              C               100            SLI
SLI Lighting Solutions, Inc.                         North Carolina        C               100            SLI
SLI Lighting Company                                 Delaware              C               100            SLP
CML Air, Inc.                                        New Hampshire         C               100            SLI
Electro-Mag International, Inc.                      Delaware              C               100            SLI
Alba Speziallampen Holding GmbH                      Germany               LLC             100            SLI
Chicago Miniature Lamp - Sylvania I                  The Netherlands       C               100            CML-SLI
   B.V. ("BVI")
Chicago Miniature Lamp - Sylvania II                 The Netherlands       C               100            BVI
   B.V. ("BVII")
Sylvania Lighting International B.V.                 The Netherlands       C               100            BVII
   ("SLI-BV")
Flowil International (Holding) B.V.                  The Netherlands       C               100            SLI-BV
Badalex Limited                                      United Kingdom        C               100            BVII
</TABLE>

*C = Corporation, LLC = Limited Liability Company,
LP = Limited Partnership Interest, GP = General Partnership Interest
Exhibit No. 15

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Gerber Scientific, Inc.:

|Re: | Registration Statements on Form S-8,
|--- | ------------------------------------
|    | File No. 2-93695, No. 33-58668,     
|    | No. 333-26177, No. 333-42879,       
|    | No. 333-81447, No. 333-83463,       
|    | No. 333-39754, and No. 333-116991   
|    |                                     

With respect to the subject Registration Statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated March  9, 2005 related to our review of interim financial information.



Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such reports are not considered a part of a Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

/ s / KPMG LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

March 9, 2005
1/14/15

Fourth Court Of Appeals r-o :_•"

Court of Appeals Mumber 04-14-00785-cv *■*£*"%.

Trial Court Case-20U-CI-15957

Maryann Castca vs Manuel Castro "I""**- 3-

;■ en -7;

Motion filed by Appellant Maryann Castro, disagree with the trial courts order. Accepting Appellee

Manuel Castro filing on contesting Appellants Affidavit of Indigency.

Appellee Manuel Castro, has not supported me financially during the process of divorce, committed

fraud, adultery, and almost cost me my home support, due to non-payment of mortgage. And is hiding

the fact of Appellants disability, Maryann Castro spousal maintence is needed. Appellant Maryann

Castro is disabled and became disabled during the thirty year marriage, and was defrauded of her right

to spousal maintance Appellee Manuel Castro and mistress overvalue the martial property using

Comparative Market Analysis realtors opinion, to defraud Appellants right to spousal Maintence.

Appellee, Manuel Castro has been supporting his mistress during our marriage Christina Pacheco and

Manuel Castro reside at 624 W. Goodwin, Pleasanton Texas 78064,Appellee Manuel Castro involved in

discriminating against Appellants, Maryann Castro right as a disabled person to apply receive Affidavit of

Indigency, due to neglecting the debts incurred in the marriage, mortgage, student loans, taxes,

insurance, and neglecting support of Appellant Maryann Castro in debts incurred in the marriage.

Appellee, Manuel Castro, is not being honest in the Agreement for Final divorce, Oct30, 2013, Appellant

Maryann Castro suffers from depression, panic attacks, high blood pressure, and type II diabetes.

Appellee Manuel Castro has salary of 70,000 year and has been dishonest in the whole process of

divorce, in the Agreement for Final Divorce signed 10/30/2013 should not have been accepted to due

fraud, overvalue of martial property 1501 Olive, bankruptcy, and discrimination of Appellant MaryAnn

Castro disability.

pray for the court to honor me spousal maintence, and zero dollar to be paid to Manuel Castro for

fraud, adultery, discriminating Appellant Maryann Castro disability who was the spouse of Appellee

Manuel Castro for thirty years.

1501 Olive is Appellant homestead, Appellee Manuel Castro did not prevent foreclosure in the

agreement it states he is to prevent foreclosure, he ignored, and continues to allow his mistress

Christina Pacheco to allow Attorney Joseph Appelt to file harassment fillings to prevent the truth of

fraud, and disability discrimination of Appellant Maryann Castro to be presented in the Court of Appeals.
Appellant Maryann Castro pray for the court to stop Appellee Manuel Castro, of fraud, and non

payment of Spousal Maintence award Appellant Maryann Castro her right of Spousal Maintence,1501

Olive St is not to be sold it is disabled person, Appellants Maryann Castro Homestead since 1995.

Appellant Maryann Castro pray for Justice and to stop the fraud and harassment of Appellee Manuel

Castro and Mistress Christina Pacheco.

Maryann Castro-pro se, Appellant

1501 Olive

Jourdanton,Tx 78026

PACATTITUDE20K3GMAIL.COM

830-496-0133
■"■ :1
:.=*

\,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,091,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,262,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (273,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,436,000
<PP&E>                                   1,085,299,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              29,005,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,177,627,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       49,871,000
<BONDS>                                    482,714,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 627,402,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,177,627,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,739
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            52,856,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          17,344,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             23,613,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                23,613,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67
        

</TABLE>