Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 134 / Thursday, July 12, 2018 / Notices 32265 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 82 FR 30833 

(July 3, 2017). 

2See Letter from Daejin, ‘‘Administrative Review 

of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Steel 

Nails from Korea—Request for Review,’’ dated July 

31, 2017. 

3See Letter from Kowire, ‘‘Steel Nails from the 

Republic of Korea—Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated July 31, 2017. 

4See Letter from the petitioner, ‘‘Certain Steel 

Nails from Korea: Request for Administrative 

Reviews,’’ dated July 31, 2017. 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Administrative Review 

of Certain Steel Nails from Korea: Antidumping 

Duty Questionnaire,’’ dated October 10, 2017. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

Preliminary Results of the 2016–2017 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Certain Steel Nails 

from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by this notice 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum) at 2. 

investigated or reviewed Chinese and 

non-Chinese exporters not listed above 

that have separate rates, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be equal to 

the exporter-specific weighted-average 

dumping margin published for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) for all Chinese exporters 

of subject merchandise that have not 

been found to be entitled to a separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

cash deposit rate established for the 

China-wide entity, 92.84 percent; and 

(4) for all exporters of subject 

merchandise which are not located in 

China and which are not eligible for a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the Chinese 

exporter(s) that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results of review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(l), 

751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(l) of the Act, and 

19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: July 3, 2018. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Discussion of the Methodology 

a. Non-Market Economy Country Status 

b. Separate Rates 

i. Separate Rates Applicants with No 

Evidence of Suspended Entries 

ii. Separate Rate Recipients 

1. Wholly Foreign-Owned Companies 

2. Wholly China-Owned Companies and 

Joint Ventures 

a. Absence of De Jure Control 

b. Absence of De Facto Control 

3. Companies Not Receiving a Separate 

Rate 

c. Separate Rate Assigned to Non-Selected 

Companies 

d. The China-Wide Entity 

e. Application of Facts Available and Use 

of Adverse Interferences 

f. Application of Partial AFA for GGB 

g. Surrogate Country 

h. Date of Sale 

i. Normal Value Comparisons 

j. Determination of Comparison Method 

k. Constructed Export Price 

i. Irrecoverable Value-Added Tax (VAT) 

ii. GGB 

l. Normal Value 

i. Factor Valuations 

ii. Currency Conversion 

5. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2018–14924 Filed 7–11–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–874] 

Certain Steel Nails From the Republic 

of Korea: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2016–2017 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that Daejin Steel Co. (Daejin), Koram 

Inc. (Koram), and Korea Wire Co., Ltd. 

(Kowire), producers/exporters of 

merchandise subject to this 

administrative review, made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value. The period of review (POR) is 

July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017. 

DATES: Applicable July 12, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Galantucci (Kowire), Maliha 

Khan (Daejin), or Trisha Tran (Koram), 

AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2923, 

(202) 482–0895, or (202) 482–4852, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 3, 2017, Commerce published 

in the Federal Register a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty (AD) 

order on certain steel nails (steel nails) 

from Korea.1 On July 31, 2017, Daejin 2

and Kowire 3 each requested an 

administrative review, and Mid 

Continent Steel & Wire, Inc.4 (the 

petitioner) requested an administrative 

review of 206 producers and/or 

exporters, including Daejin, Koram, 

Koram Steel Co. Ltd., and Kowire. On 

September 28, 2017, the petitioner 

withdrew its administrative review 

request with respect to 202 of the 206 

companies identified as producers/ 

exporters in the petitioner’s July 31, 

2017 letter. The petitioner maintained 

its administrative review request with 

respect to: Daejin, Koram, Koram Steel 

Co. Ltd., and Kowire. As such, 

Commerce issued its AD questionnaire 

to these companies on October 10, 

2017.5

Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

Commerce received timely requests to 

conduct an administrative review of 

certain exporters covering the POR. 

Because the petitioner timely withdrew 

its request for review of all of the 

companies listed in the Initiation 

Notice, with the exception of Daejin, 

Koram, Koram Steel Co. Ltd., and 

Kowire, we are rescinding this 

administrative review with respect to 

the remaining companies on which we 

initiated a review pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1). For a list of the 

companies for which we are rescinding 

this review, see Appendix II to this 

notice. 

As discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum, we 

preliminarily determine that Koram is 

the successor-in-interest to Koram Steel 

Co. Ltd.; therefore, we will not calculate 

a separate dumping margin for Koram 

Steel Co., Ltd.6 Accordingly, the three 

companies subject to the instant review 

are: Daejin, Koram, and Kowire. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
32266 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 134 / Thursday, July 12, 2018 / Notices 

7The shaft length of certain steel nails with flat 

heads or parallel shoulders under the head shall be 

measured from under the head or shoulder to the 

tip of the point. The shaft length of all other certain 

steel nails shall be measured overall. 

8See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

9 Id. 

10 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied 

the assessment rate calculation methodology 

adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation 

of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

11See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

12See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of 

Korea: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 80 FR 28955 (May 20, 2015). 

The Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and available 

to all parties in the Central Records 

Unit, room B8024 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly on the internet at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The 

signed and electronic versions of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum are 

identical in content. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

order is certain steel nails having a 

nominal shaft length not exceeding 12 

inches.7 Merchandise covered by the 

order is currently classified under the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) subheadings 

7317.00.55.02, 7317.00.55.03, 

7317.00.55.05, 7317.00.55.07, 

7317.00.55.08, 7317.00.55.11, 

7317.00.55.18, 7317.00.55.19, 

7317.00.55.20, 7317.00.55.30, 

7317.00.55.40, 7317.00.55.50, 

7317.00.55.60, 7317.00.55.70, 

7317.00.55.80, 7317.00.55.90, 

7317.00.65.30, 7317.00.65.60 and 

7317.00.75.00. Certain steel nails subject 

to this order also may be classified 

under HTSUS subheadings 

7907.00.60.00, 8206.00.00.00 or other 

HTSUS subheadings. While the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of this 

order is dispositive. For a full 

description of the scope of the order, see 

the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.8

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Export price is calculated in accordance 

with section 772 of the Act. Normal 

value is calculated in accordance with 

section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.9 A list of topics 

included in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as Appendix 

I to this notice. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

As a result of this review, we 

preliminarily determine the following 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

the period July 1, 2016, through June 30, 

2017: 

Exporter and/or producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Daejin Steel Co .......................... 3.02 

Koram Inc ................................... 10.59 

Korea Wire Co., Ltd .................... 1.10 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the 

administrative review, Commerce shall 

determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this review. 

For any individually examined 

respondents whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis 

(i.e., 0.50 percent), we will calculate 

importer-specific ad valorem duty 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for the importer’s examined sales to the 

total entered value of those same sales 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).10 For entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by each respondent for which it did not 

know its merchandise was destined for 

the United States, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the 

all-others rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company involved in the 

transaction.11 We will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review when the importer-specific 

assessment rate calculated in the final 

results of this review is above de 

minimis. Where either the respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For the 202 companies for which this 

review is rescinded, antidumping duties 

will be assessed at rates equal to the 

cash deposit of estimated antidumping 

duties in effect at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends 

to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after publication of this notice. The final 

results of this review shall be the basis 

for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise 

covered by the final results of this 

review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirement 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

notice of the final results of 

administrative review for all shipments 

of steel nails from Korea entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for the companies 

under review will be the rate 

established in the final results of this 

review (except, if the rate is zero or de 

minimis, no cash deposit will be 

required); (2) for merchandise exported 

by manufacturers or exporters not 

covered in this review but covered in a 

prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the manufacturer 

or exporter participated; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recently completed segment of the 

proceeding for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 11.80 

percent ad valorem, the all-others rate 

established in the less-than-fair value 

investigation.12

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations used in our analysis to 

interested parties in this review within 

five days of the date of publication of 

this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 134 / Thursday, July 12, 2018 / Notices 32267 

13See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). 

14See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

15 Id. 

16See 19 CFR 351.303. 

17See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

351.224(b). Interested parties are invited 

to comment on the preliminary results 

of this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may 

submit case briefs no later than 30 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs, may be filed no 

later than five days after the time limit 

for filing case briefs.13 Parties who 

submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in 

this proceeding are requested to submit 

with each brief: (1) A statement of the 

issues, (2) a brief summary of the 

argument, and (3) a table of 

authorities.14 Executive summaries 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes.15 Case and rebuttal 

briefs should be filed using ACCESS.16

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), any 

interested party may request a hearing 

within 30 days of the publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. If a 

hearing is requested, Commerce will 

notify interested parties of the hearing 

schedule. Interested parties who wish to 

request a hearing, or to participate if one 

is requested, must submit a written 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, filed 

electronically via ACCESS within 30 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice. Requests should contain: (1) The 

party’s name, address, and telephone 

number; (2) the number of participants; 

and (3) a list of the issues to be 

discussed. Issues raised in the hearing 

will be limited to those raised in the 

respective case and rebuttal briefs. 

We intend to issue the final results of 

this administrative review, including 

the results of our analysis of issues 

raised by the parties in the written 

comments, within 120 days of 

publication of these preliminary results 

in the Federal Register, unless 

otherwise extended.17

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: July 5, 2018. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Rescission of Review, In Part 

V. Affiliation 

VI. Duty Absorption Inquiry 

VII. Discussion of the Methodology 

A. Comparisons to Normal Value 

B. Product Comparisons 

C. Date of Sale 

D. Level of Trade 

E. Export Price 

F. Normal Value 

G. Successor-In-Interest Determination— 

Koram 

VIII. Currency Conversions 

IX. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Airlift Trans Oceanic Pvt. Ltd. 

Aironware Enterprise (China) Ltd. 

AM Global Shipping Lines 

Ansing Rich Tech & Trade Co. Ltd. 

Apex Maritime Co., Ltd. 

Apex Shipping Co. Ltd. 

Astrotech Steels Private Limited 

Baoding Jieboshun Trading Corp. Ltd. 

Beijing Jin Heung Co. Ltd. 

Beijing Kang Jie Kong Int’l Cargo Co. Ltd. 

Beijing Qin Li Jeff Trading Co., Ltd. 

Bestbond International Limited 

Bipex Co., Ltd. 

Bollore Logistics Co. Ltd. 

Bolung International Trading Co., Ltd. 

Bon Voyage Logistics Inc. 

Bonuts Hardware Logistics Co. Ltd. 

Brilliant Group Logistics Corp. 

C&D International Freight Forwarding 

C.H. Robinson Freight Services Ltd. 

Caesar International Logistics Co. Ltd. 

Cana (Rizhao) Hardware Co. Ltd. 

Cangzhou Xinqiao Int’l Trade Co. Ltd. 

Capital Freight Management Inc. 

Cargo Services Co. Ltd. 

Caribbean International Co. Ltd. 

Casia Global Logistics Co Ltd 

China Container Line Northern Ltd. 

China Dinghao Co., Ltd. 

China International Freight Co., Ltd. 

China Staple Enterprise Co. Ltd 

Chinatrans International Limited 

Chongqing Welluck Trading Co. Ltd. 

Chosun Shipping Co. Ltd. 

CJ Korea Express Corp. 

CKX Co. Ltd. 

Cohesion Freight (HK) Ltd. 

Consolidated Shipping Services L.L.C. 

Crelux International Co. Ltd. 

Dahnay Logistics Private Ltd. 

Dalian Sunny International Logistics 

DCS Dah Star Logistics Co., Ltd. 

De Well Container Shipping Inc. 

Dezhou Hualude Hardware Products Co., Ltd. 

Dong E Fuqiang Metal Products Co. Ltd. 

DT Logistics Hong Kong Ltd 

Duo-Fast Korea Co., Ltd. 

Dynamic Network Container Line Limited 

E&E Transport International Co., Ltd. 

ECI Taiwan Co., Ltd. 

Eco Steel Co., Ltd. 

Ejem Brothers Limited 

Eumex Line Shenzhen Limited 

Eunsan Shipping & Aircargo Co., Ltd. 

Euroline Global Co., Ltd. 

Expeditors Korea Ltd. 

Faithful Engineering Products Co. Ltd. 

Fastgrow International Co. 

Fastic Transportation Co., Ltd. 

Flyjac Logistics Pvt. Ltd. 

G Link Express Logistics (Korea) Ltd 

GCL Logistics Co., Ltd. 

Global Container Line, Inc. 

Globelink Weststar Shipping 

Glovis America 

Grandee Logistics Ltd. 

Hanbit Logistics Co., Ltd. 

Hanjin Logistics India Private Ltd. 

Hanmi Staple Co., Ltd. 

Hanon Systems 

Hebei Minmetals Co., Ltd. 

Hebei Tuohua Metal Products Co., Ltd. 

Hecny Shipping Ltd. 

Hecny Transportation Ltd. 

Hengtuo Metal Products Co Ltd 

High Link Line Inc. 

Hong Kong Hong Xing Da Trading Co. Ltd. 

Hongyi Hardware Products Co., Ltd. 

Honour Lane Logistics Company 

Honour Lane Shipping Limited 

Huanghua Yingjin Hardware Products Co., 

Ltd. 

Hyundai Logistics Co. Ltd. 

Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd. 

Integral Building Products Inc. 

International Maritime and Aviation LLC 

JAS Forwarding Co. Ltd. 

Je-il Wire Production Co., Ltd. 

Jeil Tacker Co. Ltd. 

Jiangsu Soho Honry Import Export Co. Ltd. 

Jiaxing Slk Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

Jinhai Hardware Co., Ltd. 

Jinheung Steel Corporation 

Jinkaiyi International Industry Co. 

Jinsco International Corp. 

Joo Sung Sea Air Co., Ltd. 

K Logistics Corp. 

K Logistics Inc. 

Kasy Logistics (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. 

King Shipping Company 

Korchina International Logistics Co. Ltd. 

Korea Total Logistics Co. Ltd. 

Kousa International Logistics Co. Ltd. 

Kuehne Nagel Ltd. 

LF Logistics Co. Ltd. 

Linyi Flying Arrow Imp. & Exp. Ltd. 

MR Forwarding China Ltd. 

Maxspeed International Transport Co. Ltd. 

Mingguang Ruifeng Hardware Products Co., 

Ltd. 

Nailtech Co. Ltd. 

Nanjing Caiqing Hardware Co., Ltd. 

Nauri Logistics Co. Ltd. 

NCL Container Lines Co. Ltd. 

Neo Gls 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
32268 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 134 / Thursday, July 12, 2018 / Notices 

1See Supercalendered Paper from Canada: 

Countervailing Duty Order, 80 FR 76668 (December 

10, 2015) (CVD Order). 

2See Letter from Verso, ‘‘Supercalendered Paper 

from Canada/Request for Changed Circumstances 

Review,’’ March 21, 2018 (Verso Request). 

3See Supercalendered Paper from Canada: 

Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review, 83 FR 

22249 (May 14, 2018) (Initiation Notice). 

4See Letter from Verso, et. al., ‘‘Supercalendered 

Paper from Canada (C–122–854): Joint Comments 

on Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review,’’ 

May 21, 2018. 

5See Letter to Verso Corporation, ‘‘Countervailing 

Duty Order on Supercalendered Paper from Canada: 

Changed Circumstances Review; Extension of 

Deadline for Final Results,’’ dated June 21, 2018. 

6See section 782(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.222(g). 

7See Honey from Argentina; Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances 

Neptune Shipping Limited 

Nexen L&C Corp. 

OEC Freight Worldwide Korea Co. Ltd. 

OEC Logistics Co., Ltd. 

OEC World Wide Korea Co. Ltd. 

Oman Fasteners LLC 

Orient Express Container Co., Ltd. 

Oriental Power Logistics Co. Ltd. 

Overseas Distribution Services Inc. 

Overseas International Steel Industry 

Panalpina World Transport (PRC) Ltd. 

Paslode Fasteners (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. 

Promising Way (Hong Kong) Limited 

Pudong Prime International Logistics, Inc. 

Qingdao Chesire Trading Co. Ltd. 

Qingdao D&L Group Ltd. 

Qingdao Hongyuan Nail Industry Co. Ltd. 

Qingdao Master Metal Products Co. Ltd. 

Qingdao Meijialucky Industry and Commerce 

Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Mst Industry and Commerce Co., 

Ltd. 

Qingdao Tiger Hardware Co., Ltd. 

Ramses Logistics Company Limited 

Regency Global Logistics Co., Ltd. 

Ricoh Logistics System Co., Ltd. 

Rise Time Industrial Co. Ltd. 

Sam Un Co. Ltd. 

Scanwell Container Line Ltd. 

Schenker 

Schenker & CO AG 

SDC International Australia PTY Ltd 

Seamaster Global Forwarding 

Seamaster Logistics Sdn Bhd 

Sejung (China) Sea & Air Co., Ltd. 

Shandong Dinglong Imp. & Exp. Co. Ltd. 

Shandong Liaocheng Minghua Metal PR 

Shandong Oriental Cherry Hardware Group 

Co. Ltd. 

Shanghai Haoray International Trade Co. Ltd. 

Shanghai Jade Shuttle Hardware Tools Co., 

Ltd. 

Shanghai Line Feng Int’l Transportation Co. 

Ltd. 

Shanghai Pinnacle International Trading Co., 

Ltd. 

Shanghai Pudong International 

Transportation 

Shanxi Pioneer Hardware Industry Co., Ltd. 

Shanxi Tianli Industries Co., Ltd. 

Shijiazhuang Shuangjian Tools Co. Ltd. 

Shipping Imperial Co., Ltd. 

Sino Connections Logistics Inc. 

S-Mart (Tianjin) Technology Development 

Co., Ltd. 

Sparx Logistics China Limited 

Speedmark International Ltd. 

Suntec Industries Co., Ltd. 

Swift Freight (India) Pvt Ltd. 

T.H.I. Group Ltd. 

The Stanley Works (Langfang) Fastening 

System Co., Ltd. 

Tianjin Bluekin Industries Limited 

Tianjin Coways Metal Products Co. 

Tianjin Free Trade Service Co. Ltd. 

Tianjin Fulida Supply Co. Ltd. 

Tianjin Huixinshangmao Co. Ltd. 

Tianijn Hweschun Fasteners Manufacturing 

Co. Ltd. 

Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd. 

Tianjin Long Sheng Tai 

Tianjin M&C Electronics Co., Ltd. 

Tianjin Wonderful International Trading 

Tianjin Zehui Hardware Co. Ltd. 

Tianjin Zhonglian Metals Ware Co. Ltd. 

Tianjin Zhonglian Times Technology 

Toll Global Forwarding Ltd. 

Top Logistics Korea Ltd. 

Top Ocean Consolidated Service Ltd. 

Toyo Boeki Co. Ltd. 

Trans Knights, Inc. 

Translink Shipping, Inc. 

Transwell Logistics Co. Ltd. 

Transworld Transportation Co. Ltd. 

Trim International Inc. 

TTI Freight Forwarder Co. Ltd. 

Unicorn (Tianjin) Fasteners Co., Ltd. 

UPS SCS (China) Limited 

Vanguard Logistics Services 

W&K Corporation Limited 

Weida Freight System Co. Ltd. 

Woowon Sea & Air Co. Ltd. 

Xi’an Metals and Minerals Imp. Exp. Co. 

Xinjiayuan International Trade Co. 

Xinjiayuan Trading Co., Limited 

Youngwoo Fasteners Co., Ltd. 

You-One Fastening Systems 

Yumark Enterprises Corp. 

Zhaoqing Harvest Nails Co. Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14920 Filed 7–11–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–122–854] 

Supercalendered Paper From Canada: 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review and Revocation 

of Countervailing Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is revoking the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

supercalendered paper (SC paper) from 

Canada. 

DATES: Applicable August 3, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emily Halle or Nicholas Czajkowski, 

AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone 

(202) 482–0176 or (202) 482–1395, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 10, 2015, Commerce 

published the CVD Order on SC paper 

from Canada.1 On March 21, 2018, 

Verso Corporation (Verso) (i.e., the 

petitioner) requested that Commerce 

conduct a changed circumstances 

review (CCR), pursuant to section 

782(h)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 

351.222(g)(l)(i). Verso expressed a lack 

of interest in the enforcement or 

existence of the CVD Order, and 

requested the retroactive revocation of 

the CVD Order, effective August 3, 

2015.2 Commerce published the 

initiation of this CCR on May 14, 2018.3

The parties to this proceeding provided 

comments on May 21, 2018.4 On June 

21, 2018, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.302(b), Commerce extended the 

time limit for completing this CCR.5

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review, and Revocation 

of the Order 

Pursuant to section 751(d)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.222(g), Commerce 

may revoke an antidumping duty or 

CVD order, in whole or in part, based on 

a review under section 751(b) of the Act 

(i.e., a CCR). Section 751(b)(1) of the Act 

requires a CCR to be conducted upon 

receipt of a request which shows 

changed circumstances sufficient to 

warrant a review. Section 782(h)(2) of 

the Act gives Commerce the authority to 

revoke an order if producers accounting 

for substantially all of the production of 

the domestic like product have 

expressed a lack of interest in the order. 

Section 351.222(g) of Commerce’s 

regulations provides that Commerce 

will conduct a CCR under 19 CFR 

351.216, and may revoke an order (in 

whole or in part), if it concludes that: (i) 

Producers accounting for substantially 

all of the production of the domestic 

like product to which the order pertains 

have expressed a lack of interest in the 

relief provided by the order, in whole or 

in part; or (ii) if other changed 

circumstances sufficient to warrant 

revocation exist. Both the Act and 

Commerce’s regulations require that 

‘‘substantially all’’ domestic producers 

express a lack of interest in the order for 

Commerce to revoke the order, in whole 

or in part.6 Commerce has interpreted 

‘‘substantially all’’ to represent 

producers accounting for at least 85 

percent of U.S. production of the 

domestic like product.7 In the Initiation 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1