alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than July 13, 2018.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta*                     (Kathryn Haney, Director of Applications) 1000 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *Applications.Comments@atl.frb.org*:                

                    1.                     *Robert Ward Mullins II, Huntsville, Alabama, and Holly S. Mullins, Vinemont, Alabama;*                     to become members of the previously approved Mullins Family Control Group which controls FCB Bancshares, Inc., Cullman, Alabama, and thereby indirectly controls Premier Bank of the South, Good Hope, Alabama.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 25, 2018.

Ann Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-13914 Filed 6-27-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# C_2020240EN.01003101.xml

| 20.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/31

---

Action brought on 27 May 2020 — eins energie in sachsen v Commission

(Case T-318/20)

(2020/C 240/39)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG (Chemnitz, Germany) (represented by: I. Zenke and T. Heymann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant’s decision of 26 February 2019 declaring the concentration ‘RWE/E.ON Assets’ to be compatible with the internal market, Case M.8871 (OJ 2020 C 111, p. 1); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant’s decision of 26 February 2019 declaring the concentration ‘RWE/E.ON Assets’ to be compatible with the internal market, Case M.8871 (OJ 2020 C 111, p. 1);

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-312/20, EVH v Commission.

---
# C_2021481EN.01002901.xml

| 29.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 481/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 481/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Power Horse Energy Drinks v EUIPO — Robot Energy Europe (UNSTOPPABLE)

(Case T-3/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark UNSTOPPABLE - Absolute grounds for refusal - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Lack of descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001))

(2021/C 481/41)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Power Horse Energy Drinks GmbH (Linz, Austria) (represented by: M. Woller, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Robot Energy Europe (Mijas, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 October 2020 (Case R 232/2020-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Power Horse Energy Drinks and Robot Energy Europe.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Power Horse Energy Drinks GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Power Horse Energy Drinks GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 62, 22.2.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,247,591
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,659,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    300,998
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,970,226
<PP&E>                                      22,948,618
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,341,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,194,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,550,641
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    339,407
<COMMON>                                     2,687,211
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,562,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,194,222
<SALES>                                      5,959,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,026,500
<CGS>                                        4,975,752
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,596,854
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                429,646
<INCOME-TAX>                                    34,530
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            395,116
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   395,116
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021217EN.01002001.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrative Court, Autonomous Section for the Province of Bolzano (Italy) lodged on 18 February 2021 — SG v Autonomous Province of Bolzano

(Case C-103/21)

(2021/C 217/30)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Administrative Court, Autonomous Section for the Province of Bolzano

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: SG

Defendant: Autonomous Province of Bolzano

Questions referred

| 1. | Did the aid authorised by Commission Decision SA.32113 (2010/N) of 25 July 2012 to cover 80 % of the costs of the construction of mini-hydroelectric power plants for the generation of electrical energy for own consumption from renewable energy sources for the benefit of mountain huts and hostels in high alpine areas, for which connection to the electricity grid is not feasible without disproportionate effort in technical and financial terms, expire on 31 December 2016? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Did the aid authorised by Commission Decision SA.32113 (2010/N) of 25 July 2012 to cover 80 % of the costs of the construction of mini-hydroelectric power plants for the generation of electrical energy for own consumption from renewable energy sources for the benefit of mountain huts and hostels in high alpine areas, for which connection to the electricity grid is not feasible without disproportionate effort in technical and financial terms, expire on 31 December 2016?

| 2. | If that question is answered in the affirmative: |
| --- | --- |

2.

If that question is answered in the affirmative:

| 2.1 | Is it then necessary to assess whether Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 (1) is to be interpreted as meaning that, in the case where aid is misused, the Commission must issue a recovery decision before the public authorities intervene? |
| --- | --- |

2.1

Is it then necessary to assess whether Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 (1) is to be interpreted as meaning that, in the case where aid is misused, the Commission must issue a recovery decision before the public authorities intervene?

| 2.2 | Is it necessary to assess whether the abovementioned aid is compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU, since it serves to facilitate the development of certain economic areas, or whether it is liable to distort competition and affect trade between Member States? |
| --- | --- |

2.2

Is it necessary to assess whether the abovementioned aid is compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU, since it serves to facilitate the development of certain economic areas, or whether it is liable to distort competition and affect trade between Member States?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ 2015 L 248, p. 9).

---
<PAGE>

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT. THE
CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND ARE DENOTED BY [*]. THE
CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

OWENS-BROCKWAY
PLASTIC CONTAINERS
a unit of Owens-Illinois Plastics Group

                                                                  August 1, 1997

        AMENDMENT TO EXISTING SUPPLY AGREEMENT BETWEEN USA DETERGENTS AND
                  OWENS-BROCKWAY PLASTICS OF NOVEMBER 29, 1994

USA Detergents has agreed to purchase [*] of their [*], per agreement dated May
29, 1997, [*] of its [*] needs, per agreement dated June 7, 1997, and all of
their current and replacement [*] and [*] needs, per agreement dated June 2,
1997.

Points of Agreement:

                  1.) This amends the November 29, 1994 to reflect the mechanism
                  for implementing the [*] in the [*] as provided in the May 29,
                  1997 Trigger Sprayer Supply Agreement, lower label prices per
                  attached schedule and lower Non-DBS prices.

                  2.) Lower prices to USA Detergents and supply of new items by
                  Owens-Brockway will be effective August 1, 1997.

                  Price implementation may be subject to reverting to pre August
                  1, 1997 pricing if accounts receivable are not with the stated
                  [*] status by September 1, 1997, or at Owens-Brockway's agreed
                  upon timing.

                  All Terms and conditions of the November 29, 1994 and
                  subsequent amendments remain in full effect except to the
                  extent they are inconsistent herewith.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                  <C>
USA Detergents, Inc.                                 Owens-Brockway Plastic Products Inc.
                                                     on behalf of itself and Owens-Illinois
                                                     Closure Inc. and Owens Label
                                                     and its affiliated companies

By:  /s/ Dan Parker                                  By:  /s/ David L. Andrulonis
     --------------------------------------               ----------------------------------

Title:  Vice President Materials Management          Title:  V.P. Household Business Unit
     --------------------------------------               ----------------------------------

Date:             9/11/97                            Date:             9/12/97
     --------------------------------------               ----------------------------------

</TABLE>


<PAGE>


                                 USA DETERGENTS
                                NON-DBS PROPOSAL

                                       [*]

USA-8-97          YCJ              SCHEDULE I
**Exhibit10.46**

**FIRST AMENDMENT**

**TO THE**

**2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**

**OF**

**MAGNETEK,INC.**

MagneTek,Inc. (the “Company”) hereby amends the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of MagneTek,Inc. (the “Plan”), pursuant to Section 15 of the Plan, as follows:

1.             Section 11.7 of thePlan, as set forth below, is hereby deleted in its entirety from the Plan.

Section 11.7 ***Sub-Committees***. The Board ofDirectors or the Committee may from time to time appoint one or moreSub-Committees (as defined below) comprised of one or more officers, directorsor others, which Sub-Committee shall have the powers of the Committee describedin Section 6 of this Plan solely with respect to the grant of Options toemployees who are not then officers of the Company within the meaning of Rule16a-1(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act, if and as such Rule is then ineffect. Each such Sub-Committee may be subject to any such additionalrestrictions or limitation as the Board of Directors or the Committee mayimpose at any time. Each Sub-Committee so appointed may be disbanded by theBoard of Directors or the Committee at any time, *provided*that no such termination shall affect the validity of any Option theretoforeapproved by any such Sub-Committee. For purposes of this Plan, the “*Sub-Committee*” shall mean any sub-committee, comprised ofone or more individuals, of the Committee appointed as provided in Section 2.1.The aggregate number of Shares subject to Options granted by a Sub-Committeehereunder during any calendar year to any one individual shall not exceed15,000.

2.             This First Amendment shall be effective as ofApril 24, 2007.

3.             This First Amendment amends only theprovisions of the Plan noted above.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused thisFirst Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized representative on this22nd day of August, 2007.
|        | MAGNETEK, INC. |
|--------|----------------|
|   |           |
|   | By:            | /s/ Marty J. Schwenner |   |
|   |           |   |
|   | Its:           | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|        |                |  |  |  |  |

 

----
#### Booker T. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-692.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 9, 1972.

Rehearing Denied March 15, 1972.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and Edwin T. Mulock, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See McCullers v. State, Fla. App. 1st 1962, 143 So.2d 909; Solloa v. State, Fla.App. 3d 1969, 227 So.2d 217.

LILES, Acting C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
# C_2023179EN.01002801.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2023 — Plusmusic v EUIPO — Groupe Canal + (+music)

(Case T-344/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark +music - Earlier national figurative mark + - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark acquired through use)

(2023/C 179/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Plusmusic AG (Dietikon, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Maier and A. Spieß, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Groupe Canal + (Issy-les-Moulineaux, France) (represented by: M. Georges-Picot and C. Cuny, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment in part of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 April 2021 (Case R 1236/2020-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 April 2021 (Case R 1236/2020-5) in so far as it found that there was a likelihood of confusion in respect of the goods and services in Classes 11, 25, 35, 37 and 42; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 April 2021 (Case R 1236/2020-5) in so far as it found that there was a likelihood of confusion in respect of the goods and services in Classes 11, 25, 35, 37 and 42;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Plusmusic AG, EUIPO and Groupe Canal + to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Plusmusic AG, EUIPO and Groupe Canal + to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT July Term 2014

JEANNE E. CHARLES
, Appellant,

v.

H & R BL OC K BANK
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 13

- 2895

[ September 10, 2014 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Sherwood Bauer, Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No.

562010CA003619

.

Ramon Rubio of the Law Office of Ramon Rubio, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Wm. David Newman, Jr. of Choice Legal Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

In this mortgage foreclosure case, we accept appellee ’s concession that

the trial court erred in granting appellee final summary judgment because appellee did not properly serve pleadings, including an amended complaint, motio n for s ummary judgment and hearing notice, on appellant

at the designated e

- mail address. Accordingly, we reverse this case and

remand it to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and Remanded.

G ROSS
, T

AYLOR and M AY
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Solelyin connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of RetractableTechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the United StatesSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned Thomas J. Shaw, Chief Executive Officer, and Douglas W. Cowan,Chief Financial Officer, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)      The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

 

 
| Date:  May 15, 2008 |   | /s/  Thomas J. Shaw                         |   |
|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | THOMAS J. SHAW                              |
|                     |   | PRESIDENT, CHAIRMAN,  AND                   |
|                     |   | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                     |
|                     |   |                                        |
|                     |   |                                        |
|                     |   | /s/  Douglas W. Cowan                       |   |
|                     |   | DOUGLAS W. COWAN                            |
|                     |   | VICE PRESIDENT AND  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-88805) pertaining to the Borders Group, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan,
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-79559) pertaining to the Borders
Group, Inc. Management Stock Purchase Plan, Borders Group, Inc. Stock Option
Plan, Borders Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Borders Group, Inc.
Director Stock Plan, Borders Group, Inc. 401(k) Plan, and Borders Group, Inc.
Savings Plan for Employees Working in Puerto Rico, the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-114403) pertaining to the Borders Group, Inc. 2004 Long-Term
Incentive Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-120367)
pertaining to the Borders Group, Inc. Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan
of our report dated April 5, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Borders Group, Inc. and Borders Group, Inc.'s management's
assessment of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting of Borders Group, Inc. included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 23, 2005.

                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Detroit, Michigan
April 5, 2005
ex_228216.htm


EXHIBIT 4.2


 


 


CORTLAND BANCORP


194 West Main Street


Cortland, OH 44410


 


March 17, 2021


 


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, NE


Washington, D.C. 20549


 


Re: Cortland Bancorp Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


Cortland Bancorp, an Ohio corporation, is today filing an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (the "Form 10-K"), as executed on March 17, 2021.


 


Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Cortland Bancorp hereby agrees to furnish the Commission, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements defining the rights of holders of its long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to the Form 10-K. No such instrument or agreement represents long-term debt exceeding 10% of the total assets of Cortland Bancorp and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.


 


Very truly yours,


 


 


	/s/ James M. Gasior
	
			James M. Gasior

			
	
			President and Chief Executive Officer 


			(Principal Executive Officer)