alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   The Gillette Company

                                                                             Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                              Three months     Three months
Dollars in millions                              ended            ended
                                              March 31, 2003   March 31, 2002       2002       2001       2000       1999       1998
                                             ---------------  ---------------      -----      -----      -----      -----      -----
<S>                                                   <C>               <C>       <C>       <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>
Earnings:
 Income from continuing operations before
 income taxes                               $            376              323      1,752      1,342      1,288      1,912      1,656
       Interest expense                                   14               20         84        145        223        136         94
       Interest portion of rental expense                 11               10         43         31         25         20         17
       Amortization of capitalized interest                3                3         10          9          6          5          4

                                                       -----            -----      -----      -----      -----      -----      -----
       Earnings available for fixed charges $            404              356      1,889      1,527      1,542      2,073      1,771
                                                       =====            =====      =====      =====      =====      =====      =====

Fixed Charges:
       Interest expense                     $             14               20         84        145        223        136         94
       Interest capitalized                                1                1          4         11         23         13         18
       Iterest portion of rental expense                  11               10         43         31         25         20         17

                                                       -----            -----      -----      -----      -----      -----      -----
       Total fixed charges                  $             26               31        131        187        271        169        129
                                                       =====            =====      =====      =====      =====      =====      =====



Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                      15.5             11.5       14.5        8.2        5.7       12.3       13.7
                                                       =====            =====      =====      =====      =====      =====      =====

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the first quarter ended September 2, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Patty Townsend, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   October 13, 2005



/s/ Patty Townsend
------------------
Patty Townsend
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



                                       24
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the third quarter ended March 3, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Patty Townsend, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

Dated:   April 11, 2006



/s/ Patty Townsend
------------------
Patty Townsend
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon
request.

                                       25
#### L. A. DURHAM, Petitioner, v. SIMKINS PAPER COMPANY et al., Respondents.

No. 40692.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 16, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

LOIS B. CHANDLER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CASUAL CORNER GROUP,

INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee,  No. 00-2209 and

CLAUDIO DELVECCHIO, President and

CEO in his official capacity and in

his personal capacity; KAREN

RASMUSSEN, In her official capacity

and in her personal capacity,

Defendants. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.

T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge.

(CA-99-1626-A)

Submitted: May 17, 2001

Decided: May 25, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 
COUNSEL

Lois B. Chandler, Appellant Pro Se. David C. Burton, Sean Michael

Gibbons, Steven David Brown, WILLIAMS, MULLEN, CLARK &

DOBBINS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Lois B. Chandler appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Casual Corner in her employment discrimination

action. Claims submitted to this court on appeal from the district

court’s grant of summary judgment are subject to de novo review. See

Mitchell v. Data General Corp., 12 F.3d 1310, 1313 (4th Cir. 1993).

Chandler first claims that Casual Corner’s failure to promote her

to the position of store manager was an adverse employment action.

The district court, however, properly found no adverse action because

it was undisputed that Chandler never applied for the position. See

Shackleford v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP, 190 F.3d 398, 400 (5th Cir.

1999). 

Chandler’s second cause of action alleged Casual Corner acted

adversely in withholding quarterly bonuses. The employer asserted

legitimate reasons in conformance with their written disciplinary policy for the actions it undertook, and Chandler offered no evidence that

the actions taken were pretextual. See Taylor v. Virginia Union University, 193 F.3d 219, 230 (4th Cir. 1999). 

Accordingly, we find no reversible error and affirm the judgment

of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

2 CHANDLER v. CASUAL CORNER GROUP
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

CHANDLER v. CASUAL CORNER GROUP 3
#### David Harvey BOOTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-443.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 14, 1971.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Frank H. White, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Warren H. Petersen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged and convicted under the narcotic laws of the State of Florida. He appeals his judgment and sentence, presenting three points on appeal. We find no merit in points one and three. However, point two is well taken.

Appellant, an indigent, was sentenced to the maximum of five years in prison and $5,000 fine. The sentence also provided that if appellant failed to pay the fine he would have to serve an additional year in prison.

In this court’s recent opinion in Dunn v. State, 247 So.2d 26, filed April 14, 1971, we held that under the U. S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Williams v. Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 90 S.Ct. 2018, 26 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970), a sentence as imposed against an indigent in the case sub judice is improper and must be modified.

Accordingly, that portion of the sentence which provides that if appellant fails to pay the $5,000 fine he must serve an additional year in prison is vacated. In all other respects the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Affirmed as modified.

LILES, Acting C. J., and HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Charles T.
Bernhardt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
November 8, 2010





/s/Charles T. BernhardtCharles
      T. Bernhardt, CPAChief
      Financial Officer





1
[No. 995-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

October 26, 1971.]

#### Agnes D. Sawina, *Appellant,*v. Edward A. Sawina, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 681148, Lloyd Shorett, J., entered June 18, 1968. *Remanded*with instructions by unpublished opinion pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
#### Charles Louis ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-897.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 21, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32

<PAGE>



     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Whitemark  Homes,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  Barry Reese,  the Principal
Executive and Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


September 5, 2012                 By:  /s/ Barry Reese
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Barry Reese, Principal Executive and
                                       Financial Officer

<PAGE>
EX-4.4





 Exhibit 4.4 
  





 
 See Restrictions on Reverse Side 
organized under
the laws of the state of delaware 
NUMBER SHARES 
LONESTAR RESOURCES US INC.

COMMON STOCK 
CUSIP 54240F 20 2 
The Corporation is Authorized to Issue 90,000,000 Shares Common Stock—$0.001 Par Value Per Share 
This Certifies that SPECIMEN is the owner of fully paid and non-assessable Shares of the Common Stock of LONESTAR RESOURCES US INC.
transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the
Corporation. 
CHASE C. BOOTH, SECRETARY 
FRANK D. BRACKEN, III, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
authorized signature 












 



 
 THE CORPORATION IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE MORE THAN ONE CLASS OR 
SERIES OF STOCK. THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE TO 
EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO SO
REQUESTS A COPY OF THE POWERS, 
DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE RIGHTS OF EACH 
OUTSTANDING CLASS OR SERIES OF STOCK OF THE CORPORATION, AND THE 
QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS
OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES 
AND/OR RIGHTS. 
For Value Received,

TRANSFEROR NAME 
hereby sells, 
assigns and transfers unto 
ASSIGNEE NAME 
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER
OF ASSIGNEE 
ASSIGNEE NAME 
represented by the within certificate, and hereby 
Amount of shares units or other ownership
interest 
irrevocably constitute and appoint 
Dated 
The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of this certificate in every particular without any alteration or change. 
Witness Signature 
Transferor Signature 
Signature(s) Guaranteed: 
Attorney to transfer said ownership on the books of the within named
Company with full power of substitution in the premises. 
NOTICE: 
THE
SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE 
GUARANTOR INSTITUTION, (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND 
LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN 
AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE
MEDALLION PROGRAM), 
PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. 
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws
or regulations. Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the list. 
TEN COM – as tenants in common 
TEN ENT – as tenants by the entities 
JT TEN –as joint tenants with rights of
survivorship and not as tenants in common 
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT – Custodian (Minor) 
Under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State)
#### Arthur WILBORN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-65.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Jerry THOMAS and Florida Audubon Society et al., Appellants, v. PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al., Appellees.

No. 71-141.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 5, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                          $5,728
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                       376
<INVENTORY>                                      2,045
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,726
<PP&E>                                           5,680
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,246
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           762
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,985
<SALES>                                         15,569
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,569
<CGS>                                            4,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,739
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,748
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,991
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,991
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $5.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, James T. Engen,certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of LOUD Technologies Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Dated: November 13,  2006 | By:    | /s/ James T. Engen                                |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   | James T. Engen                                    |
|                           |   | *Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0054

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

THOMAS CURRAN

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 7, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 1 2024

05/01/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0054
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 295

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2872) to prevent and punish

crime, to strengthen the rights of crime victims, to assist State and

local efforts against crime, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 4, 1993

Mr. MCCOLLUM submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2872) to

prevent and punish crime, to strengthen the rights of

crime victims, to assist State and local efforts against

crime, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That immediately after the adoption of this

2 resolution the House shall resolve itself into the Commit3 tee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for the

4 consideration of the bill (H.R. 2872) to prevent and pun5 ish crime, to strengthen the rights of crime victims, to as6 sist State and local efforts against crime, and for other

7 purposes, the first reading of the bill shall be dispensed

8 with, and all points of order against the bill and against
2

HRES 295 IH

1 its consideration are hereby waived. After general debate

2 which shall be confined to the bill, and which shall not

3 exceed three hours equally divided and controlled by the

4 chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

5 on the Judiciary, the bill shall be considered for amend6 ment under the five-minute rule. At the conclusion of the

7 consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee

8 shall rise and report the bill to the House with such

9 amendments as may have been adopted. The previous

10 question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

11 amendments thereto to final passage without intervening

12 motion except one motion to recommit, with or without

13 instructions.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the second quarter ended November 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark W. McCutcheon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   August 26, 2004


/s/ Mark W. McCutcheon
----------------------
Mark W. McCutcheon
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                       22