alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Doyle CONNER, as Commissioner of Agriculture, and the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services of the State of Florida, Appellants, v. FLORIDA POULTRY FEDERATION, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. P-256.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 16, 1972.

Robert A. Chastain, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Richard O. Jacobs, of Ulmer, Wood-worth & Jacobs, St. Petersburg, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See State ex rel. Graham v. Nash Johnson & Sons’ Farms, Inc., 263 N.C. 66, 138 S.E.2d 773 (1964).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ricardo Bernardes,

1. I have reviewed this annual report
on Form 10-K of California Steel Industries, Inc. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant
and we have:

(a) design such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or person performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 25, 2008



By:

/s/ RICARDO BERNARDESRicardo BernardesExecutive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: 11/12/14 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013
- 0602 FROM: Ray

Saracino , EPA Region 9 SUBJECT: November 6, 2014 M eeting with Arizona Officials and Stakeholders Regarding

Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on November 6, 2014 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2 , 2014 and published in the Federal Register on June 18, 2014. **ATTENDEES External Stakeholders**  ADEQ: Eric Massey , Steve Burr Tucson Electric Power: Erik Bakken, Jeff Yockey , Mike Sheehan Salt River Project: Kara Montalvo, Barbara Sprungl , Grant Smedley Arizona Corporation Commission: Steve Olea, Margaret ‘Tob y’ Little, Ed Stoneburg , B Gray , and L ori Lustig Arizona Electric Power Coop: L ogan Gernet Arizona Public Service: Ann Becker, Nancy Nesky , Paul Smith, Charles Spell Tristate: Brian Nelson , Andy Berger Sierra Southwest Co

- op: Michelle Freeark Jordan, Bischoff & Hiser: Eric Hiser Tai Wallace Maureen Scott Harry Sauthoff **EPA** Erika Wilson, Office of Atmospheric Programs (OAP) Misha Adamantiades, OAP Christian Fellner, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Colin Boswell, OAQPS David Solomon, OAQPS Angela Shatas, OAQPS Chris Sherry , OAP Matt Clouse, OAP Jeremy Mark, OAPAmy

Z impfer, Associate Director R9 Air Division Ray Saracino, R9 Anita Lee, R9 **Attachment** filename: 111(d) Docket Memo Attachment _141017 AZ 111d Questions EPA HQ Follow

- Up
EXHIBIT 10.26


                               AMENDMENT NUMBER 3
                                   TO THE
                             DICTAPHONE CORPORATION
                          MANAGEMENT STOCK OPTION PLAN


          AMENDMENT,  dated as of July 28, 1999, to the  Dictaphone  Corporation
Management Stock Option Plan (the "Plan").

                             W I T N E S S E T H :

          WHEREAS,   the  Board  of  Directors   (the   "Board")  of  Dictaphone
Corporation  (the "Company") has determined that it desires to amend the Plan to
increase the number of shares of Company common stock issuable thereunder and to
make certain clarifying changes; and

          WHEREAS,  Section  11(b) of the Plan provides that the Board may amend
the Plan from time to time;

          NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

          1.  INCREASE IN SHARES  SUBJECT TO THE PLAN.  Section 2 of the Plan is
hereby  amended by  replacing  the number  1,200,000 in each place it appears in
such Section with the number 1,500,000.

          2. EFFECTIVE  DATE.  This Amendment  Number 3 shall be effective as of
the date first above written.
EXHIBIT 24.3

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Harris Ravine, David Kirwan and Mary Beth Wallingford the undersigned's true
and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each with full power and substitution for the undersigned and in the undersigned's name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to
sign Fischer Imaging Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-K") and any or all amendments to the
Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto each of said
attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that either of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his substitute
or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereto.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be executed as of this 13th day of April, 2004.

| |  | /s/TAYLOR SIMONTONSignature
| |  | ---------------------------
| |  | Taylor SimontonPrint Name: 

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                            EXHIBIT 15.1



                         ACCOUNTANTS' AWARENESS LETTER



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated May 9, 2001, on our review of the condensed
consolidated interim financial information of Global Marine Inc. and
subsidiaries (the "Company") as of and for the period ended March 31, 2001, and
included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then
ended is incorporated by reference in (i) the prospectus constituting part of
the Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-32088,
33-40961 and 33-63326), respectively, for the Global Marine Inc. 1989 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan and the Global Marine 1998 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan, (ii) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-80383, 333-40244, 33-32088,
33-40961, and 33-63326) for the Global Marine 1998 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan, (iii) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-40266) for the Global Marine Savings
Incentive Plan, (iv) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-40961) for the Global
Marine Inc. 1990 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, (v) the prospectus
constituting part of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 33-57691) for the Global Marine Inc. 1994 Non-Employee Stock
Option and Incentive Plan, (vi) the prospectus constituting part of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-40244) for
the Global Marine Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan, (vii) the
combined prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration Statements
on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 33-58577 and 333-49807) for the proposed offering
of up to $500,000,000 of debt securities, preferred stock and/or common stock,
and (viii) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-45908) for the resale of up to
$600,000,000 principal amount at maturity of Zero Coupon Convertible Debentures
due June 23, 2020, and shares of common stock of the Company issuable upon
conversion thereof.

Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
May 9, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,912,204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,620,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    380,386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               621,326
<PP&E>                                      24,002,950
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,265,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,419,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,306,005
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    339,407
<COMMON>                                     2,687,211
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,916,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,419,497
<SALES>                                      4,919,322
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,059,662
<CGS>                                        4,061,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,762,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                297,602
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,547
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            296,055
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   296,055
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
Order entered February 3, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00945-CR

DESHAUN LANELL CLARK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F19-53238-Q

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s January 29, 2020 motion for extension of time to file its 

brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the State’s brief due February 28, 2020. This case 

is currently at issue.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
# C_2021422EN.01000401.xml

| 18.10.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 422/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 422/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 16 July 2021 — Agenzia delle Entrate v Contship Italia SpA

(Case C-433/21)

(2021/C 422/05)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Agenzia delle Entrate

Respondent: Contship Italia SpA

Question referred

Do Articles 18 (ex Article 12 TEC) and 49 (ex Article 43 TEC) TFEU preclude national legislation which, like Article 30(1)(5) of legge 23 dicembre 1994, n. 724 (Law No 724 of 23 December 1994), in the version applicable ratione temporis, prior to the amendments introduced by legge 27 dicembre 2006, n. 296 (Law No 296 of 27 December 2006), excludes from the measures to prevent tax avoidance by non-operational companies — based on minimum revenue and income thresholds relative to the value of specific corporate assets, which, if not met, is a sign that the company is non-operational and means that the taxable income must be determined by way of presumption — only companies and entities whose securities are traded on Italian regulated markets and not companies and entities whose securities are traded on foreign regulated markets, as well as the companies that control or are controlled by, even indirectly, those listed companies and entities?

---
# C_2021349EN.01001502.xml

| 30.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania) lodged on 23 April 2021 — Uniqa Asigurări SA v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală de Soluționare a Contestațiilor and Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

(Case C-267/21)

(2021/C 349/19)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Uniqa Asigurări SA

Respondents: Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală de Soluționare a Contestațiilor and Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

Question referred

In interpreting Article 59 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, (1) can claims settlement services supplied by correspondent companies for an insurance company, in the name and on behalf of the latter, be classified in the category of services supplied by consultants, engineers, consultancy firms, lawyers, accountants and other similar services, as well as data processing and the provision of information?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

---
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 10


PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL

April 26, 2000



Mr. John Appel
[Address]
[Address]


Dear John:

As we have discussed, it is important to GTE that you remain with the company at
least through the closing of the merger. That being the case, if you remain with
GTE at least through the closing (or, if later, June 30, 2000) but separate as a
result of the merger thereafter, GTE will calculate your lump sum pension
benefit using the interest rate as of July 1, 2000 or the interest rate that
would ordinarily be used given your actual separation date, whichever would
provide you with the highest lump sum benefit. This special interest rate
protection will only be applicable if you elect to receive a lump sum pension
distribution following your separation, and any increase in the amount to which
you are entitled as a result of this commitment will be payable from the general
assets of GTE.

John, I want to thank you again for your flexibility. We need your leadership
now - more than ever. I truly appreciate this additional commitment.

Sincerely,



J. Randall MacDonald
Executive Vice President -
Human Resources & Administration

JRM:wh

c:   J. T. D'Angelo, Jr.
     E. D. Singer
#### Sidney KITCHEN, Jr. v. FONTENOT CONSTRUCTION CO.

No. 62620.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Sidney Kitchen, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Tangipa-hoa.

Writ denied.
LEARN MORE: https://www.gsa.gov/hcats

BEST IN CLASS 

PROFILE: BMO

HCaTS Unrestricted (HCaTS U), HCaTS

Small Business (HCaTS SB) and HCaTS 8(a)

provide reliable, flexible, fast and efficient ways

to obtain best-value, customized solutions for

human capital management and training

requirements. These Tier 3 solutions expedite

the procurement of complex services by using

FAR 16.5 streamlined acquisition procedures.

BUYING TRAINING & 

HUMAN CAPITAL SERVICES 

HAS NEVER BEEN EASIER

● Pre-vetted, Highest Technically Rated Contractors 

with Fair and Reasonable Pricing

● Average PALT <60 days

● Maximizes small business utilization goals

● All contract types, including hybrids

● Commercial and non-commercial services for both 

CONUS and OCONUS

● Ancillary services & ODCs at the task order level

● No protests under $10 Million

2 EASY WAYS TO ACCESS 

1. DIRECT BUY ACQUISITION - Receive a Delegation 

of Procurement Authority, build and buy directly.

2. ASSISTED ACQUISITION SERVICES - Provides 

custom acquisition, project, and financial 

management support services for the full life cycle 

of the acquisition, including scope reviews, 

requirements statements and solicitation 

development, COR services and more.

$658M+ Obligations

280+ Task Orders

67% Task Orders to Small Businesses

36% $ Obligated to Small Businesses

85 Small Business Vendors

BY THE NUMBERS (FY 2017 - FY 2021) 

BEST IN CLASS PROFILE:

FLEXIBLE & TIME SAVING

“THE CONTRACT 

VEHICLE IS VERY EASY 

TO USE WITH QUALITY 

VENDORS.”

~ Contracting Officer

Department of Homeland Security 

Transportation Security Administration
# C_2021189EN.01001001.xml

| 17.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla y León (Spain) lodged on 11 February 2021 — Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León v Delia

(Case C-86/21)

(2021/C 189/10)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla y León

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León

Respondent: Delia

Questions referred

| 1. | Do Article 45 TFEU and Article 7 of Regulation No [492]/2011 (1) preclude a national provision such as Article 6(2)(c) of Decree 43/2009 of 2 July 2009, which prohibits the recognition of periods of service in a particular occupational category in a public health service of another Member State of the European Union? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do Article 45 TFEU and Article 7 of Regulation No [492]/2011 (1) preclude a national provision such as Article 6(2)(c) of Decree 43/2009 of 2 July 2009, which prohibits the recognition of periods of service in a particular occupational category in a public health service of another Member State of the European Union?

| 2. | If the answer to question 1 is affirmative, could the recognition of periods of service in the public health system of a Member State be made conditional on the prior adoption of general approval criteria for the career systems of staff of the health services of Member States of the European Union? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to question 1 is affirmative, could the recognition of periods of service in the public health system of a Member State be made conditional on the prior adoption of general approval criteria for the career systems of staff of the health services of Member States of the European Union?

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1).

---
EXHIBIT NO. 15



To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Gerber Scientific, Inc.:







|Re: | Registration Statements on Form S-8,
|--- | ------------------------------------
|    | File No. 2-93695, No. 33-58668,     
|    | No. 333-26177, No. 333-42879,       
|    | No. 333-81447, No. 333-83463 and    
|    | No. 333-39754                       
|    |                                     
|    | Registration Statement on Form S-3, 
|    | File No. 33-58670                   
|    |                                     

With respect to the subject Registration Statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated March
10, 2003 related to our review of interim financial information.



Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act, such reports are not considered a part of a Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.





/ s / KPMG LLP







Hartford, Connecticut
March 10, 2003
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 48

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses

of investigations and studies by the Committee on Ways and Means

in the first session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. ROSTENKOWSKI submitted the following resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House

for expenses of investigations and studies by the Committee on Ways and Means in the first session of the One

Hundred Third Congress.

1 Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and

2 studies by the Committee on Ways and Means (hereinafter

3 in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), includ4 ing expenses for procurement of consultant services under

5 section 202(i) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of

6 1946, there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of

7 the House not more than $4,992,000.
2

HRES 48 IH

1 (b) Not more than $10,000 of the amount specified

2 in subsection (a) may be used for consultant services re3 ferred to in such subsection.

4 SEC. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made

5 on vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

6 Chairman of the Committee, and approved by the Commit7 tee on House Administration.

8 SEC. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolu9 tion for investigations and studies carried out during the

10 period beginning at noon on January 3, 1993, and ending

11 immediately before noon on January 3, 1994.

12 SEC. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution

13 shall be expended in accordance with regulations pre14 scribed by the Committee on House Administration.

Æ