alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition at June 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and the
Statement of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 1998 (Unaudited)
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,002,167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,036,689
<PP&E>                                         168,840
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,371,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          403,897
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       130,722
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,822,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,371,154
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,548
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,901,660
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,835,204)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,835,204)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
257 La. 452

#### CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. Judy Marie MERRICK.

No. 51100.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 13, 1971.

In re: Judy Marie Merrick applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The ruling complained of is correct.
[No. 867-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

June 14, 1971.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Orville Williams, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 4432, Phillip G. Sheridan, J., entered November 16, 1970. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
H. Res. 515

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

August 19, 1994.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4908) to authorize the hydrogen and fusion research, development, and demonstration programs, and the

high energy physics and nuclear physics programs of the Department of Energy, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall

be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. After general debate the bill shall be considered for

amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered by title rather than by section. Each title shall be

considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the

bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the

bill to the House with such amendments as may have been
2

HRES 515 EH

adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered

on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without

intervening motion except one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
263 La. 110

#### Leland F. HORTMAN et al. v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, State of Louisiana.

No. 52885.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 19, 1972.

In re: Leland F. Hortman et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Sabine. 265 So.2d 812.

Application denied. On the facts found by the court of appeal, the application fails to demonstrate error of law.
#### Ernest PRITCHETT, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 72-124.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 20, 1973.

Charles W. Musgrove, Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William W. Herring, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The court having heretofore granted petitioner delayed appellate review of his 1964 conviction of assault with intent to commit rape, finds that no error has been demonstrated, and the judgment and sentence are therefore severally affirmed and the writ denied.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: August 6, 2015 519631 

________________________________

In the Matter of ALBERT 

HARRIOTT,

Petitioner,

v

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

MICHAEL SHEAHAN, as 

Superintendent of Five

Points Correctional

Facility,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: June 8, 2015

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ.

__________

Albert Harriott, Elmira, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H.

Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of respondent which found petitioner

guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Determination confirmed. No opinion.

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ., concur.
-2- 519631 

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D23- 1099 LT Case No. 2019
- CF

- 004956 -A

_____________________________ J AVO N L. M AXWELL , Appella nt,
v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee
.

_____________________________ On a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Robert W. Hodges, Judge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Steven N. Gosney, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. F ebruary 13, 2024
P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . E DWARDS , C.J., H ARRIS , and B OATWRIGHT , J J., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

January 15, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00891

- CV

WEBB COUNTY

, Appellant

v.

Juan C. Garcia LINO , Individually and as Representative of the Estates of Suleika R. Fonseca

Saldivar, Deceased, and Alessandra Juliette Garcia, Deceased, Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CVA000356D3 Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Because the notice of appeal did not show it was served on each co urt reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record

, c ontra T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 51.017(a)

, on January 13, 2020, we ordered Appellant to file an amended notice of appeal certifying proper service on the responsible court reporter(s)

. Appellant timely complied ; our January 13, 2020 order is SATISFIED.
The reporter’s record is due on January 16 , 2020.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 15th day of January, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 15

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Frischs Restaurants, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying interim
consolidated balance sheet of Frischs Restaurants, Inc. (an Ohio Corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 16, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the
twenty-eight week and twelve week periods ended December 16, 2008 and December 11, 2007. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information
consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheet as of June 3, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated July 28, 2008, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                      
|----------------------
|GRANT THORNTON LLP    
|                      
|/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
|Cincinnati, Ohio      
|January 19, 2009
# C_2023155EN.01000601.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 March 2023 — European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators v Aquind Ltd

(Case C-46/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Energy - Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 - Article 17 - Request for exemption relating to an electricity interconnector - Refusal decision from the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) - Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 - Article 19 - Board of Appeal of ACER - Intensity of the review)

(2023/C 155/07)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (represented by: P. Martinet and E. Tremmel, acting as Agents, and by B. Creve, advokat)

Other party to the proceedings: Aquind Ltd (represented by: J. Bille, C. Davis, S. Goldberg and E. White, Solicitors)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the main appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the main appeal;

| 2. | Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the cross-appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the cross-appeal;

| 3. | Orders the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) to bear its own costs relating to the main appeal and to pay those incurred by Aquind Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) to bear its own costs relating to the main appeal and to pay those incurred by Aquind Ltd;

| 4. | Orders the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) and Aquind Ltd to bear their own costs relating to the cross-appeal. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) and Aquind Ltd to bear their own costs relating to the cross-appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 22.3.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                       5,205,448
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,174,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,347,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,691,578
<PP&E>                                      31,519,632
<DEPRECIATION>                             (7,155,541)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             103,182,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,047,266
<BONDS>                                        102,654
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,927
<OTHER-SE>                                  61,623,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               103,182,937
<SALES>                                      2,967,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,093,782
<CGS>                                        1,790,515
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,032,592
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,873,985
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             296,461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                893,936
<INCOME-TAX>                                   353,105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            540,831
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 64,290
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   476,541
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        



</TABLE>
# C_2022318EN.01001901.xml

| 22.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/19

---

Order of the President of the Court of 30 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa — Juízo Local Cível de Lisboa — Portugal) — DS, CF, DT, CL v Orbest, SA

(Case C-704/21) (1)

(Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Compensation and assistance to passengers - Cancellation or long delay of flights - Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation - Extraordinary circumstances - Collision of a catering vehicle with an aircraft parked at the airport)

(2022/C 318/26)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa — Juízo Local Cível de Lisboa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: DS, CF, DT, CL

Defendant: Orbest, SA

Operative part of the order

Case C-704/21 is removed from the Register of the Court.

---

(1)  Date of filing: 23.11.2021.

---
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Robert L. SHEVIN, Appellant, v. Robert C. FULLER, Appellee.

No. 72-535.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 10, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR '95 AND '96 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         734,247
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  804,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     87,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,673,351
<PP&E>                                       1,129,995
<DEPRECIATION>                                 710,207
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,124,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,105,804
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,326
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,014,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,124,129
<SALES>                                      4,192,406
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,192,406
<CGS>                                        1,850,533
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,016,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,007
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,249
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                161,931
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            161,931
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   161,931
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 555 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 234
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 555

                          [Report No. 103-766]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4299) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1995 for 
 intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States 
     Government, the Community Management Account, and the Central 
  Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 1994

  Mr. Beilenson, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4299) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1995 for 
 intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States 
     Government, the Community Management Account, and the Central 
  Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Resolved, That all points of order against the conference report to 
accompany the bill (H.R. 4299) to authorize appropriations for fiscal 
year 1995 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the 
United States Government, the Community Management Account, and the 
Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for 
other purposes, and against its consideration are waived.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 234

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 555

                          [Report No. 103-766]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4299) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1995 for 
 intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States 
     Government, the Community Management Account, and the Central 
  Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 29, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 425 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 425

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit voting 
               by proxy in committees and subcommittees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1994

Mr. Goodlatte submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit voting 
               by proxy in committees and subcommittees.

    Resolved, That clause 2(f) of rule XI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended to read as follows:
    ``(f) No vote by any member of any committee or subcommittee with 
respect to any measure or matter may be cast by proxy.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### Thomas HUTCHINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES1 et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11424.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

July 11, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 24, 1977.

J. Arthur Smith, III, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellant.

Anthony J. Clesi, Jr., Baton Rouge, for defendants-appellees.

Before SARTAIN, COVINGTON and LOTTINGER, JJ.

1

. The correct name of the defendant is State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

SARTAIN, Judge.

For reasons this day assigned in *McMillan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al,*La.App., 349 So.2d 949, the judgment of the district court in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Helen J. McMillan Stilley, and against plaintiff, Thomas Hutchinson, is hereby reversed and set aside; and, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of plaintiff, Thomas Hutchinson, and against Linda T. Oliphant, Helen J. McMillan Stilley and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, in solido, in the sum of $2,930.00, together with legal interest thereon from date of judicial demand, until paid. In all other respects the judgment appealed is affirmed. The costs in these consolidated cases are assessed one-third to Mrs. McMillan, individually, and two-thirds against Mrs. Linda T. Opiphant and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, in solido.

REVERSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART AND RENDERED.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Jessie McGEE v. Charles FOTI, Jr., Sheriff Orleans Parish Prison.

No. 61996.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 5, 1978.

In re: Jessie McGee applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans.

Denied.