Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2023 ALJ Decisions
                              Dawn Whitten, CR6298 (2023)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Dawn Whitten, CR6298 (2023)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Dawn Whitten,
(OI File No.: 4-15-40273-9),
Petitioner,

v.

The Inspector General.
Docket No. C-23-314Decision No. CR6298June 13, 2023

        
              
    

      DECISION

I sustain the determination of the Inspector General (IG) to exclude Petitioner, Dawn Whitten, from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and other federally funded health care programs for a minimum period of five years.  Petitioner was convicted of crimes that mandate her exclusion pursuant to sections 1128(a)(1) and (a)(3) of the Social Security Act (Act).

I.    Background

The IG filed a brief and seven proposed exhibits that are identified as IG Ex. 1 - IG Ex. 7. Petitioner filed a brief and no exhibits.  I receive the IG’s exhibits into evidence.

Neither side offered the testimony of a witness. Consequently, I decide this case based on the parties’ written submissions.

II.    Issues, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

**A.  Issues**

Page 2

The issue is whether Petitioner was convicted of crimes that mandate her exclusion.

**B.  Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law**

Section 1128(a)(1) of the Act mandates exclusion of any individual who is convicted of a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or a state health care program (Medicaid).  Section 1128(a)(3) mandates exclusion of any individual convicted of a criminal offense related to fraud, theft, embezzlement, breach of fiduciary responsibility, or other financial misconduct in connection with the delivery of a health care item or service, or with respect to any act or omission in a health care program other than Medicare or Medicaid, operated by, or financed in whole or in part by any federal, state, or local agency.

The two statutory sections are independent.  It is not necessary to prove that an individual has been convicted of a crime that meets the requirements of both sections to establish a basis for exclusion.  A crime that meets the requirements of either section will suffice.

Here, however, the evidence proves that Petitioner was convicted of crimes that fall within the reach of both sections 1128(a)(1) and (a)(3).

On August 9, 2018, Petitioner pled guilty in federal court to crimes consisting of: conspiracy to commit health care fraud, wire fraud and mail fraud; health care fraud; and aggravated identify theft.  IG Ex. 2; IG Ex. 3.  The court entered a judgment of conviction against Petitioner on that date.

Petitioner was specifically charged with, and pled guilty to, participating in a conspiracy to defraud health care benefits programs, including Medicare and non-federal health insurers.  IG Ex. 2 at 1; IG Ex. 4 at 9.  She participated in the conspiracy in her job as an outside sales representative for a pharmacy that filed fraudulent reimbursement claims with health insurers.  Petitioner’s role in the conspiracy was to generate false prescriptions for medications, on which she forged physicians’ signatures.  IG Ex. 2 at 13, 14, 16.

Petitioner’s sentence for her crimes included a court order that she pay restitution.  IG Ex. 6 at 2.  In an amended restitution order, the court specifically held that a component of the restitution included money owed by Petitioner and a co-conspirator to the Medicare program.  IG Ex. 7 at 2.

Petitioner’s convictions are for crimes that meet the requirement of section 1128(a)(1) that they be “related to” the delivery of an item or service under Medicare.  In this case one need not strain to find a nexus between Petitioner’s crimes and Medicare items or services.  The relationship is palpable.  Medicare was one of the targets of the conspiracy

Page 3

in which Petitioner was a participant.  An object of that conspiracy was to generate false claims for Medicare items or services.  Petitioner’s crimes had a direct and measurable effect on Medicare, as is evidenced by the court’s order that she pay restitution to the program.

Petitioner argues that she was not convicted of a Medicare-related crime because counts of the criminal information involving specific prescriptions to which she entered her guilty plea do not involve prescriptions for Medicare items or services. P. Br. at 3-5.  Rather, according to Petitioner, those prescriptions were for drugs covered by insurers other than Medicare.  *Id*.  That may be true, but it serves as no defense for Petitioner.  She pled guilty to a conspiracy that made Medicare a victim.  She was an active participant in that scheme even if she was not convicted of generating specific false claims for Medicare items or services.  Furthermore, her participation in the conspiracy had an impact on Medicare as is established by the court’s order that she pay restitution to that program; restitution that clearly was intended to make Medicare whole for fraudulent reimbursement claims for Medicare items or services.

The evidence offered by the IG also unequivocally proves that Petitioner pled guilty to crimes that fall within the reach of section 1128(a)(3) of the Act.  Section 1128(a)(3) covers crimes of a financial nature that relate to health care items or services other than Medicare or Medicaid items or services.  Those include fraud committed against private health insurers consisting of false reimbursement claims for items or services covered by those insurers.  The conspiracy to which Petitioner pled guilty included a scheme to defraud private insurers.  Petitioner pled guilty to direct involvement in a scheme to fraudulently obtain money by virtue of false reimbursement claims filed with several non-government health insurers.  IG Ex. 2 at 17-18.

The specific counts of generating fraudulent prescriptions to which Petitioner pled guilty involved prescriptions for medications that were reimbursed by insurers including Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, among others. IG Ex. 2 at 13.  Petitioner’s co-conspirators billed private insurers for fraudulent prescriptions including prescriptions generated by Petitioner.  *Id.* at 14, 16.  As is the case with the elements of the conspiracy that were aimed at Medicare, the conspiracy aimed at private insurers had a direct and palpable relationship to items and services covered by those insurers.

Page 4

The IG elected to exclude Petitioner for a period of at least five years.  That is the minimum exclusion period mandated for exclusions imposed pursuant to sections 1128(a)(1) and (a)(3) of the Act.  Consequently, the length of Petitioner’s exclusion is not an issue in this case.
  
          /s/
        Steven T. Kessel

                      Administrative Law Judge Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back