alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 513

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

August 12, 1994.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4906) to amend the Congressional Budget and

Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to limit consideration of

nonemergency matters in emergency legislation. The first

reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order

against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate

shall be confined to the bill and the amendments made in

order by this resolution and shall not exceed one hour divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on Rules. After general debate the bill shall

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule and

shall be considered as read. No amendment shall be in order

except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules

accompanying this resolution. Each amendment may be offered only in the order printed, may be offered only by a
2

HRES 513EH

Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read,

shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally

divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent,

and shall not be subject to amendment. All points of order

against the amendments printed in the report are waived. If

more than one of the amendments printed in the report is

adopted, only the last to be adopted shall be considered as

finally adopted and reported to the House. At the conclusion

of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee

shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendment as may have been finally adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and any

amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 15.1       




                  ACCOUNTANTS' AWARENESS LETTER



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Re:  Global Marine Inc. Registration Statements

We are aware that our report dated November 7, 1997, on our review of the
condensed consolidated interim financial information of Global Marine Inc. and
subsidiaries for the three and nine months ended September 30, 1997, and
included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is incorporated by reference
in (i) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-32088, 33-40961, and 33-63326),
respectively, for the Global Marine Inc. 1989 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan, (ii) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-40266) for the Global Marine
Savings Incentive Plan, (iii) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-40961) for the Global
Marine Inc. 1990 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, (iv) the prospectus
constituting part of the Company's  Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 33-57691) for the Global Marine Inc. 1994 Non-Employee
Stock Option and Incentive Plan and (v) the prospectus constituting part of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 33-58577)
for the proposed offering of up to $75,000,000 of debt securities, preferred
stock and/or common stock.  Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act
of 1933, this report should not be considered a part of any of said registration
statements prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and
11 of that Act.


/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Houston, Texas
November 10, 1997
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-20813

Summary Calendar

KATHY COON,

Plaintiff−Appellant,

versus

CORELOGIC, INCORPORATED; FNC, INCORPORATED,

Defendants−Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 4:18-CV-2260

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kathy Coon appeals the summary judgment on her various statutory 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 31, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-20813 Document: 00515365929 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2020
No. 19-20813

2

and common-law claims regarding her termination as a long-time employee of 

FNC, Incorporated, which she sued along with its owner, CoreLogic, Incorporated. On October 28, 2019, the district court issued a lengthy and impressively thorough Order explaining why Coon had not established a prima facie

case and why, even if she had, she is entitled to no relief.

We have reviewed the briefs, the pertinent law, and the briefs. The dismissal resulting from the summary judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for 

the reasons convincingly explained by the district court.

 Case: 19-20813 Document: 00515365929 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/31/2020
No. 10696.

#### John Deere Plow Co. *v.*Dungan.

Decided February 16, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Pickaway county.

*Mr. E. B. Kinkead*and *Mr. Meeker Terwilliger,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Charles Gerhardt,*for defendant in error.

"Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers and Price, JJ., concur.
# C_2020304EN.01002101.xml

| 14.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/21

---

Action brought on 28 July 2020 — Bigben Connected v EUIPO — Forsee Power (FORCE POWER)

(Case T-478/20)

(2020/C 304/25)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Bigben Connected (Fretin, France) (represented by: M. Chaminade, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Forsee Power (Paris, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark FORCE POWER — Application for registration No 16 541 377

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 May 2020 in Case R 2184/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the opposing party to pay the costs, including those of the proceedings before the Opposition Division and those of the appeal before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the opposing party to pay the costs, including those of the proceedings before the Opposition Division and those of the appeal before the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2021490EN.01002201.xml

| 6.12.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 490/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/22

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 8 September 2021 — Hauptzollamt Hamburg v Shell Deutschland Oil GmbH

(Case C-553/21)

(2021/C 490/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Hauptzollamt Hamburg

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Shell Deutschland Oil GmbH

Question referred

Does the principle of proportionality under EU law apply also to the optional tax reduction provided for in the fourth indent of the first sentence of Article 5 of Directive 2003/96/EC, (1) such that the Member State may not refuse to grant the tax reduction after the period for making an application under national law has expired, if assessment has not yet been time-barred at the time the application is received by the competent authority?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51).

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Richard A. PASS.

No. 62605.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Richard A. Pass applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans.

Not considered. Application has not been first filed in the district court.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellant v. Robert C. CURTIS et al.

No. 17160.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Dec. 5, 1962.

Murray L. Galinson, Asst. U. S. Atty., for appellant.

K. C. Weyl, Duluth, Minn., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court, 207 F. Supp. 536, dismissed on motion of appellant.
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

I N THE MATT ER OF B .L .C., A J UVENI L E § § § § § § No. 08-10-00186- CV

Appea l from 289th District Court of B exar County , Texas (TC # 2007-JUV-02757)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION The appea l is befor e the Court for a deter mination whether it should be dismiss ed. Finding there is no appea lable orde r, we dismiss the appe al for w ant of jurisdiction. 1
On September 19, 2007, the State file a petitio n alleg ing Appellant eng ag ed in delinquent conduct by

committing indece ncy

with a child by sexual contac t. By its petition, the S tate sought

a deter minate sentenc e. A jury found that Appellant eng ag ed in delinquent conduct as alleg ed in the petition. The jury found that Appellant was in need of reha bilitation, sentenc ed him to five y ear s in the Tex as Youth Commi ssion with possible transfe r t o the Tex as Departmen t o f C ri m i nal J ustice
I nstitut ional Division, and rec ommended that he be place d on probation outside of his home. Shortly before Appellant’s eig hteenth birthday , the State filed a motion to transfe r the deter minate sentenc e probation to an adult district c ourt. The trial court signe d an order on Marc h 5, 2010 transfe rring Appellant’s juvenile deter minate sentenc e probation to a criminal district court pursuant to Section 54.051 of the Texas Fa mily Code. T E X .F A M .C O D E AN N
. §54.051 (Ve rn on

T h i s c a s e w a s t r a n s f

e r r e d f r o m t h e F o u r t h C o u r t o f A p p e a l s t o t h e E i g h t h C o u r t o f A p p e a l s p u r s u a n t t o a 1 d o c k e t e q u a l i z a t i o n o r d e r i s s u e d b y t h e S u p r e m e C o u r t o f T e x a s
. S e e T E X
. G O V ’ T C O D E A N N
. § 7 3

. 0 0 1 ( V e r n o n 2 0 0 5 )

.2008). The transfe r beca me eff ective on Appellant’s eig hteenth birthday , April 2, 2010. See
T E X .F A M .C O D E AN N
. §54.051(d). On May 14, 2010, the trial cour

t held a hea

ring on Appellant’s written objections to ch an g es in the conditions of probation, but the court declined to amend the condition s
. Appellant there afte r filed notice of appea l stating an intention to challeng e matters raised by written motion and ruled on by the trial cour

t on May 14, 2010.
On J uly 19, 2010, we sent Appellant noti ce of o u r i n tent to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant’s counsel has filed a written response conce ding that Appellant did not file notice of appea l from the transfe r order , and even if he had, the transfe r order is not appea lable. We
ag ree
. See In the Matter of J.H. , 176 S.W .3d 677, 679 (Tex.App.--Dal l as 2005, no pet.). Additionally , counsel corr ectly states that the trial court’s ref usal to amend the conditions of probation is not appea lable. See Basaldua v. State , 558 S.W .2d 2, 5 (Tex.Crim.App. 1977). 2
Acc ording ly , we dismiss the appea l for wa nt of jurisdiction.

September 29, 2010 ANN CRAWFORD McCL URE, J ustice
Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ

.

T h e C o u r t c o m m e n d s c o u n s e l f o r f i l i n g a c a n d i d a n d t h o r o u g h r e s p o n s e t o t h e i n q u i r y . 2
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 426 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 426

To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to allow Members to 
   require rollcall votes to strike specific line items contained in 
                          appropriation bills.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1994

Mr. Goodlatte submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to allow Members to 
   require rollcall votes to strike specific line items contained in 
                          appropriation bills.

    Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by inserting at the end the following new 
clause:
    ``8. Any Member may demand a rollcall vote to strike any line item 
in any measure making or continuing appropriations if supported by 49 
other Members. If that vote does not occur, then it shall be in order 
for that Member to make a point of order against further consideration 
of that measure by the House.''.

                                 <all>
```
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06

- 14

- 00090

- CV

In the Interest of X.R.L., S.J.S., and Z.N.S., Children

(No. 2013

- 2155

- DR IN 307TH DISTRICT COURT OF GREGG COUNT Y)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

SUPPLEMENT AL CLERK'S RECORD

MOTION FEE

CLERK'S RECORD

REPORTER'S RECORD

FILING $10.00
$21.00 $10.00
$287.00 $596.00
$195.00 INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT ALEX TYRA, APPT ATTY

ALEX TYRA, APPT ATTY
ALEX TYRA, APPT ATTY
ALEX TYRA, APPT ATTY

BRAN DY BONNER, APPT ATTY
BRANDY BONNER, APPT ATTY

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause,

as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of

the COURT OF APPEALS for the Sixth District of Texas, this
June 19, 2015

.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___

________________________ Deputy
Exhibit 10.4


 


FoxWayne
Enterprises Acquisition Corp.


1
Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 1039


New
York, New York 10020


 


January
19, 2021


 


FoxWayne
Enterprises Acquisition Sponsor LLC


1
Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 1039


New
York, New York 10020


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the
registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of FoxWayne Enterprises Acquisition Corp.’s (the “Company”) securities and continuing until the
earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in
each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination
Date”), FoxWayne Enterprises Acquisition Sponsor LLC shall make available to the Company certain office space, utilities
and secretarial support as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 1 Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 1039, New
York, New York 10020 (or any successor location). In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay FoxWayne Enterprises Acquisition
Sponsor LLC the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. FoxWayne
Enterprises Acquisition Sponsor LLC hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or
to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) to be established upon
the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a
result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the
Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


[Signature
Page Follows]


 




    	-1-



     


    

 


	 	Very
    truly yours,
	 	 
	 	FOXWAYNE
    ENTERPRISES ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 
	 	By:
    	/s/
    Robb Knie
	 	Name:
    	Robb
    Knie
	 	Title:	Chief
    Executive Officer



 


	AGREED
    TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 
	FOXWAYNE
    ENTERPRISES ACQUISITION SPONSOR, LLC	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Robb Knie	 
	Name:	Robb
    Knie	 
	Title:	Managing
    Member	 


 




    	-2-
Emerald Kalama Chemical , LLC
1296 Third Street NW, Kalama, WA 98625 / Phone: 360

- 673

- 0317

www.emeraldmaterials.com 

### Emerald Performance Materials
P

- Isopropyl Cinnamic Aldehyde Production Forecast

2014

- 2017

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION. THIS
INFORMATION IS INTENDED FOR USE SOLELY BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OF THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVALUATING A NEW SUBSTANCE PREMANUFACTURE NOTICE.



### New Substa nce Name : 2

- Propenal, 3

- [4

- (1

- methylethyl)phenyl]

- Trade Name s : P

- Isopropyl Cinnamic Aldehyde; PICA ; CYCLEMAX STEP 1

Calendar Year Maximum Production (kg)
2014 7,000 2015 33,000 201 6 58,000
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134091 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134091 COA: 260771 Wayne CC: 04-011411-01 ERNEST HALL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 17, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Fischer Imaging Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, StevenDurnil, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Date: March  31, 2006 | /s/   STEVEN  DURNIL                   |   |
|--------|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                       | Steven  Durnil*Chief Executive Officer and President* |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF DICTAPHONE CORPORATION AT MARCH 31,
2000 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 3 MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,002
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,851
<INVENTORY>                                     39,470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,035
<PP&E>                                          80,872
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 448,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,248
<BONDS>                                        363,965
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           51,379
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                    (82,569)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   448,529
<SALES>                                         53,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,258
<CGS>                                           54,190
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (5)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,355)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,355)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>