alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 10, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14733]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLWY920000. L51040000.FI0000. 18XL5017AR]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
WYW174754, Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As provided for under the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as 
amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for 
reinstatement of competitive oil and gas lease WYW174754 from Hot 
Springs Resources Ltd for land in Natrona County, Wyoming. The lessee 
filed the petition on time, along with all rentals due since the lease 
terminated under the law. No leases affecting this land were issued 
before the petition was filed. The BLM proposes to reinstate the lease.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erik Norelius, Acting Branch Chief for 
Fluid Minerals Adjudication, Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming State 
Office, 5353 Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming, 82003; 
phone 307-775-6176; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f1949f9e83949d9884b1939d9cdf969e87"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbded5d4c9ded7d2cefbd9d7d695dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf may call 
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact Mr. 
Norelius during normal business hours. The FRS is available 24 hours a 
day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above 
individual. A reply will be sent during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee agreed to the amended lease terms 
for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre, or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and the $159 cost of 
publishing this notice. The lessee met the requirements for 
reinstatement of the lease per Sec. 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). The BLM proposes to reinstate the 
lease effective October 1, 2012, under the original terms and 
conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates 
cited above.

    Authority:  30 U.S.C. 188(e)(4) and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(b)(2)(v).

Erik Norelius,
Acting Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 2018-14733 Filed 7-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with the Annual Report of GFSB Bancorp,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Richard C. Kauzlaric,
President, and Jerry R. Spurlin, Chief Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/Richard C. Kauzlaric                      /s/Jerry R. Spurlin
----------------------------------           -----------------------------------
Richard C. Kauzlaric                         Jerry R. Spurlin
President                                    Chief Financial Officer




October 26, 2004



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### MISSISSIPPI STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. W. N. HAGGARD.

No. 46255.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 24, 1971.

W. H. Jolly, Columbus, for appellant.

Burgin, Gholson, Hicks & Nichols, Columbus, for appellee.

SMITH, Justice:

This is an eminent domain case. Mississippi State Highway Commission appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Lowndes County entered pursuant to a jury award of $25,000 to W. N. Haggard as compensation and damages for the taking for highway purposes of a small portion of certain commercial property owned by the latter.

As is not unusual, the testimony of witnesses for the Commission fixed the amount to which Haggard was entitled at a figure considerably lower than the award; that of Haggard and his witnesses at a far greater sum. In addition to this conflicting testimony there was a view of the property by the jury.

While the award seems to us quite high, the amount of it, after all, was for the jury. This Court has said many times that it will not interfere with a jury verdict un*640less we are able to say from the record that it was so grossly excessive as to evince passion or prejudice on the part of the jury in returning ■ it. The estimates given by the opposing witnesses were so widely disparate as to be virtually irreconcilable. And while the award is several times the amount considered to be due by the witnesses for the Commission, it is only about half that reflected by the testimony of Haggard and his witnesses. In addition, it is to be remembered that the jury saw the property itself.

Since we cannot say from the record in this case that the award falls within that class of grossly excessive verdicts evincing passion or prejudice on the part of the jury, and may not substitute our judgment for that of the jury, the judgment appealed from must be affirmed. Mississippi Power Company v. Head, 218 So.2d 24 (Miss.1968); Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Ferguson, 190 So.2d 455 (Miss.1966).

Affirmed.

ETHRIDGE, C. J., and RODGERS, PATTERSON and ROBERTSON, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 11.


MUSTANG.COM, INC.

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(In thousands, except earnings per share)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
                                                                     Three Months            Twelve Months
                                                                        Ended                    Ended
                                                                     December 31,             December 31,
                                                                    1998       1999          1998      1999
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                              <C>       <C>           <C>      <C>
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                 4,099      5,757         3,707    4,822
Common stock equivalents from outstanding stock options                  0          0             0        0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average common and common stock equivalents outstanding              4,099      5,757         3,707    4,822
============================================================================================================
Net Income (Loss)                                                 $   (147)  $   (574)      $(1,157)    (906)
============================================================================================================
Earnings (Loss) per share - BASIC (1)                             $   (.04)  $   (.10)      $ ( .31) $  (.19)
============================================================================================================
</TABLE>

(1) Fully diluted earnings per share have not been presented because the effects
are not material.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[No. 861-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

October 26, 1971.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Richard Clayton James, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 54263, Horton Smith, J., entered October 29, 1970. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Jesse Armstrong, Respondent.

[655 NYS2d 545]

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Finnegan, J.), dated November 9, 1995, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 (1) to set aside a jury verdict convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and granted a new trial.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the motion is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

The trial court granted the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30 (1), based solely on the alleged ineffectiveness of trial counsel. Consequently, any other application for relief on any other basis is not properly before this Court *(see,*CPL 470.15 [1]). Further, since the facts which formed the basis of the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel did not appear in the trial record, the trial court erred in granting relief on that basis in the absence of a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 *(see, People v Grossfeld,*216 AD2d 319; *People v Leka,*209 AD2d 723). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            1855
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               85
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1776
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1861
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   105
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        6
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   225
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (126)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (126)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.53)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023104EN.01001002.xml

| 20.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/10

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — The Navigator Company SA, Navigator Pulp Figueira SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-459/21, (1) The Navigator Company and Navigator Pulp Figueira)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 176 - Exclusions from the right to deduct VAT - Less favourable scheme compared to the mechanism for deducting expenses provided for in respect of a direct tax governed by national law - Principle of equivalence - Inapplicability)

(2023/C 104/12)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: The Navigator Company SA, Navigator Pulp Figueira SA

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Operative part of the judgment

The principle of equivalence must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, maintained pursuant to the second paragraph of Article 176 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, and which establishes a total or partial exclusion of the right to deduct VAT paid in respect of certain motor vehicle expenses, travel and accommodation expenses and entertainment expenses as well as legal costs, even though such expenses are covered by a scheme which is allegedly more favourable, in terms of the deductibility of those expenses, in the context of a direct tax governed by national law.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 11, 10.1.2022.

---
# C_2022303EN.01000702.xml

| 8.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Port de Bruxelles, Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v Infrabel SA

(Case C-229/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Trans-European transport network - Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 - Article 15(1) - Inland waterways transport infrastructures - Inland ports - Obligation of a Member State to connect inland ports with road or rail transport infrastructures - Removal of the connection with one of those two types of transport infrastructure - Conditions)

(2022/C 303/09)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Port de Bruxelles, Région de Bruxelles-Capitale

Respondent: Infrabel SA

Interveners: FIF-FSI (Fonds d’Infrastructure Ferroviaire) SA, État belge, Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, Port de Bruxelles SA, Lineas SA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU, must be interpreted as meaning that, where an inland port which forms part of the comprehensive network, within the meaning of Article 6(1) and (2) of that regulation, has connections to both road and rail transport infrastructures, it precludes the removal of one of those two types of connection, save in exceptional circumstances. The failure to maintain the connection in question as a result of non-compliance with that provision, or the economic exploitation of the land occupied by those infrastructures, do not constitute such circumstances.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7879

MICHAEL F. DEHONEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARGARET B. SEYMOUR, U. S. Magistrate; WILLIAM

B. TRAXLER, U. S. District Judge; WILLIAM J.

CLINTON, President of the United States,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., William B.

Traxler, Jr., District Judges. (CA-96-1539-5-17JI)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 30, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a South Carolina inmate, appeals the district

court's orders denying relief on his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named

Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) complaint

under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997), denying his motion to

reconsider, and denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find that this appeal

is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Dehoney v. Seymour, No. CA-96-1539-5-17JI

(D.S.C. Sept. 30, 1997; Nov. 7, 1997 & Nov. 25, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. 1350

Each of the undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Gerber Scientific, Inc., hereby certifies that, on the date hereof:

(i)	The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gerber Scientific, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2006 filed the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)	Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gerber Scientific, Inc.



|Date:  September 8, 2006 | /s/ Marc T. Giles                                   | 
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------- | 
|                         | Marc T. Giles
President and Chief Executive Officer | 



| | /s/ Jay Zager                                                  | 
| | -------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Jay Zager
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-17-1997
<CASH>                                        51567000
<SECURITIES>                                 134230000
<RECEIVABLES>                                 59608000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  270689000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             543977000
<PP&E>                                      1530516000
<DEPRECIATION>                               709358000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1493827000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        348523000
<BONDS>                                      182603000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      62486000
<OTHER-SE>                                   815520000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1493827000
<SALES>                                      928936000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             928936000
<CGS>                                        663731000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                904340000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4404000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               24596000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9684000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           14912000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  14912000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        


</TABLE>
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 33

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President

should call for a vote in the General Assembly and Security Council

of the United Nations to convene a United Nations Conference on Reforms, and should initiate proposals to expand the membership of the

Security Council and strengthen the United Nations peacekeeping role.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1993

Mr. PENNY (for himself, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. HUGHES) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the President should call for a vote in the General Assembly and Security Council of the United Nations to

convene a United Nations Conference on Reforms, and

should initiate proposals to expand the membership of

the Security Council and strengthen the United Nations

peacekeeping role.

Whereas the United Nations has more than tripled its membership since it was chartered in 1945;

Whereas the permanent membership of the United Nations

Security Council has remained unchanged with 5 members since its creation in 1945;
2

•HRES 33 IH

Whereas the nonpermanent membership of the Security

Council was expanded from 6 to 10 members in 1963;

Whereas the end of the Cold War has resulted in a new international balance of power, as well as in new global problems and threats, which create the need for a more representative United Nations Security Council and a more

effective and efficient United Nations peacekeeping role;

and

Whereas in the last 4 years the United Nations has established 13 peacekeeping operations involving a total of

47,000 troops and an annual budget of more than

$2,000,000,000: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the President—

3 (1) should call for a vote in the General Assem4 bly and Security Council of the United Nations to

5 convene a United Nations Conference on Reforms;

6 (2) should initiate a proposal to expand the

7 United Nations Security Council by creating a new

8 group of permanent members without the veto power

9 and by increasing the number of nonpermanent

10 members; and

11 (3) should initiate a proposal to create a United

12 Nations Endowment Fund for Peacekeeping Oper13 ations and a United Nations Peacekeeping Reserve

14 Force.

Æ
VERIZON NORTH INC.





EXHIBIT 12





COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES





Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002(Dollars in Millions)Income before provision for income taxes

$
702.3Equity in loss from affiliate


2.0Interest expense


78.4Portion of rent expense representing interest


24.3Amortization of capitalized interest


.9Earnings, as adjusted

$
807.9Fixed charges:Interest expense

$
78.4Portion of rent expense representing interest


24.3Capitalized interest


1.1Fixed Charges

$
103.8Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


7.78