Halloche m Pharm a Co.,Ltd .

HALLOCHE M PHARM ACO.,LTD 

# '^HcavE o

Respondent , ^> R " 5 2t 9 

# DOCKE T FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

Complainant . Cas e NO.2009NE70022 5 Date : Marc h 25 , 201 0 ANSWE R Th e Halloche m Pharm a Co.,Lt d (Hallochem)hereb yfile s it s answe ran d state s th e following : 1 . Ite m 1 o fth e Complaint : den y (1 ) O n Apri l 15th , 2009 , Halloche m has reache d a Purchas e Orde rwit h Alf a Aesa rAccordin g t o tha t Purchas e Order , Alf a Aesa rhas purchase d 25K G Antimon y (III) , an d th e partie s hav e chose n th e FOB terms . (2 ) A s w e al l know , i fFOB i s adopte d i n th e internationa l trade , i t i s th e purchaser' s obligatio n t o appoin t th e carrier ; th e selle rshal l onl yhav e th e obligatio n t o handove rth e good s t o th e carrier . Afte rthat , Halloche m has fulfille d al l th e obligation s a

s th e vendor . I t i s th e buye rwh o shoul d dea l wit h th e procedure s fo r entry . (3 ) Mor e importantly , i n th e abov e mentione d purchas e contract , Alf a Aesa rha s clearl yrequire d tha t th e good s shal l b e shippe d vi a FedEx , an d Alf a Aesa rhas tol d Halloche m hi s Accoun t Numbe ro fFedEx(1319-3098-4 ) i n th e Purchas e Order . Pursuan t t o tha t purchas e contract , Halloche m delivere d th e good s (Antimon y(ill ) t o FedEx , an d FedExshippe d the m t o Alf a Aesar . Th e carriag e fe e aros e fro m th e shipmen t wa s als o pai d b yAlf a Aesar . Obviously , althoug h Halloche m "offered " th e good s t o FedEx , Halloche m i s no t th e tru e consignor . 2 . Ite m 2 o fth e Complaint : admi t • o

" 1 u

„ . - L J K O c j ;

r-T n

- o cr > - r l

- - — A • :: J r o • " ^ f'- Z ' rV'j O

—1 — O COC 3 13 0 ^ 

## s s rAlf a Aesa r, rathe rtha n Hallochem , i s th e actua l consigno rfo rth e shipment . 3 . Ite m 3 o fth e Complaint : admi t 4 . Item 4 o fth e Complaint : admi t (1 ) W e mus t emphasiz e th e fac t tha t Halloche m i s no t th e consignor . (2 ) We jus t hav e th e obligatio n t o finis h th e custo m formalitie s fo rexportation . 5 . Ite m 5 o fth e Complaint : lac k o finformatio n t o admi t o rden y 6 . Ite m 6 o fth e Complaint : W e admi t claus e a ,bu t fo rclaus e b ,w e d o no t have th e enoug h informatio n t o admi t o rdeny . 7 . Ite m 7o fth e Complaint : admi t We mus t emphasiz e th e fac t tha t Halloche m i s no t th e consignor . 8 . Ite m 8 o fth e Complaint : admi t We mus t emphasiz e th e fac t tha t Halloche m i s no t th e consigno r 9 . Ite m 9 o fth e Complaint : den y (1 ) Base d o n th e foregoing , Halloche m i s no t th e tru e consigno rActually , i t i s th e Alf a Aesa rwh o offere d th e shipmen t t o th e Fed Ex . (2 ) Whe n w e handove rth e shipmen t t o FedEx , Halloche m have clearl y describe d th e nam e o fth e substanc e t o b e transported , whic h i s Antimony(lll) . (3 ) Fed E

xfaile d t o fulfil l it s obligatio n o fnotification . Whe n FedExhas accepte d th e package , h e didn' t pu t forwar d an yobjection s relatin g t o th e classification , description , mar k

an d labe l regardin g t o th e shipment . (4 ) A s a n internationa l an d reputabl e expedite d deliverycompany . Fed E xshoul d have refuse d t o accep t th e shipment , whic h di d no t compl ywit h th e order s o f destinatio n country . (5 ) I fFedE xaccep t th e packag e withou t an yobjection , Halloche m ha s th e reaso n t o believ e tha t th e packag e satisfyal l th e requirement s o fth e U.S.A .10 . Ite m 1 0 o fth e Complaint : den y (1 ) W e mus t emphasiz e tha t Halloche m i s no t th e tru e consignor . Actually , i t i s th e Alf a Aesa rwh o offere d th e shipmen t t o th e Fed Ex . Alf a Aesa rshoul d responsibl e fo rfulfillin g al l th e procedure s fo rimport . (2 ) W e understan d tha t Antimon y(III ) i s a kin d o fchemica l substance . Actually , w e have require d Alf a Aesa rt o provid e th e certificatio n fo rentry . Whe n w e reac h th e Purchas e Orde rwit h Alf a Aesar , o n th e basi s o fou rrequirement , Alf a Aesa rissue d a "Toxi cSubstanc e Contro l Act Certification" . Then , Halloche m delivere d th e above-describe d shipmen t t o FedE xafte rHalloche m go t th e certificat e issue d b yAlf a Aesa rSince Alf a Aesa ri s a n US compan yan d th e shipmen t w e delivere d i s th e sampl e th e quantit yo fwhic h i s jus t 25kg , w e have everyreaso n t o believ e tha t Alf a Aesar' s certificatio n i s tru e an d th e above-describe d shipmen t fo rentr yi s no t i n violatio n o fan yapplicabl e rul e o rorde rhereunde r (3 ) Fed E

xfaile d t o fulfil l it s obligatio n o fnotification . Whe n FedE xhas accepte d th e package , h e didn' t pu t forwar d an yobjection s relatin g t o th e classification , description , mar k

an d labe l regardin g t o th e shipment . (4 ) A s a n internationa l an d reputabl e expedite d deliverycompany . Fed E xshoul d have refuse d t o accep t th e shipment , whic h di d no t compl ywit h th e order s o f destinatio n country . (5 ) I fFedExaccep t th e packag e withou t an yobjection , Halloche m has th e reaso n t o believ e tha t th e packag e satisfyal l th e requirement s o fth e U.S.A . 11 . Ite m 1 1 o fth e Complaint : den y (1 ) W e mus t emphasiz e tha t Halloche m i s no t th e tru e consignor . Actually , i t i s th e Alf a Aesa rwh o offere d th e shipmen t t o th e Fed Ex . Alf a Aesa rshoul d responsibl e fo rfulfillin g al l th e procedure s fo rimport . (2 ) We understan d tha t Antimon y(III ) i s a kin d o fchemica l substance . Actually , w e have require d Alf a Aesa rt o provid e th e certificatio n fo rentry . Whe n w e reac h th e Purchas e Orde rwit h Alf a Aesar , o n th e basi s o fou rrequirement , Alf a Aesa rissue d a "Toxi cSubstanc e Contro l Act Certification" . Then , Halloche m delivere d th e

-S S _ • ift ' ± t I •. —rtVabove-describe d shipmen t t o FedE xafte rHalloche m go t th e certificat e issue d byAlf a

Aesar . Since Alf a Aesa ri s a n US compan yan d th e shipmen t w e delivere d i s th e sampl e th e quantit yo fwhic h i s jus t 25kg , w e have everyreaso n t o believ e tha t Alf a Aesar' s certificatio n i s tru e an d th e above-describe d shipmen t fo rentr yi s no t i n violatio n o fan yapplicabl e rul e o rorde rhereunder . (3 ) Fed E

xfaile d t o fulfil l it s obligatio n o fnotification . Whe n FedE xhas accepte d th e package , h e didn' t pu t forwar d an yobjection s relatin g t o th e classification , description , mar k

an d labe l regardin g t o th e shipment . (4 ) A s a n internationa l an d reputabl e expedite d deliverycompany . Fed E xshoul d have refuse d t o accep t th e shipment , whic h di d no t compl ywit h th e order s o f destinatio n country . (5 ) I fFedExaccep t th e packag e withou t an yobjection , Halloche m has th e reaso n t o believ e tha t th e packag e satisfyal l th e requirement s o fth e U.S.A . 12 . Ite m 1 2 o fth e Complaint : den y i (1 ) We mus t emphasiz e tha t Halloche m i s no t th e tru e consigno rActually , i t i s

th e Alf a Aesa rwh o offere d th e shipmen t t o th e Fed Ex . Alf a Aesa rshoul d responsibl e fo rfulfillin g al l th e procedure s fo rimport . (2 ) Whe n w e handove rth e shipmen t t o FedEx , Halloche m hav e clearl y 1 describe d th e nam e o fth e substanc e t o b e transported , whic h i s Antimony(lll) . '} (3 ) Whe n FedE xhas accepte d th e package , h e didn' t pu t forwar d an yobjection s j relatin g t o th e classification , description , mar k an d labe l regardin g t o th e shipment . \ (4 ) I fFedE xaccep t th e packag e withou t an yobjection , Halloche m has th e \ reaso n t o believ e tha t th e packag e satisfyal l th e requirement s o fth e U.S.A . i 13 . Ite m 1 3 o fth e Complaint : den y I (1 ) W e mus t emphasiz e tha t Halloche m i s no t th e tru e consigno rActually , i t i s % \ th e Alf a Aesa rwh o offere d th e shipmen t t o th e Fed Ex . Alf a Aesa rshoul d responsibl e I fo rfulfillin g al l th e procedure s fo rimport . I (2 ) W e understan d tha t Antimon y(III ) i s a kin d o fchemica l substance . Actually , 1 j w e have require d Alf a Aesa rt o provid e th e certificatio n fo rentry . Whe n w e reac h th e 

## I 1 : l a ? I7 U if fi t •+— . Tft

-Purchas e Orde rwit h Alf a Aesar , o n th e basi s o fou rrequirement , Alf a Aesa rissue d a

"Toxi cSubstanc e Contro l Ac t Certification" . Then , Halloche m delivere d th e above-describe d shipmen t t o FedE xafte rHalloche m go t th e certificat e issue d byAlf a Aesar . Since Alf a Aesa ri s a n US compan yan d th e shipmen t w e delivere d i s th e sampl e th e quantit yo fwhic h i s jus t 25kg , w e have ever yreaso n t o believ e tha t Alf a Aesar' s certificatio n i s tru e an d th e above-describe d shipmen t fo rentr yi s no t i n violatio n o fan yapplicabl e rul e o rorde rhereunder . (3 ) Fed E

xfaile d t o fulfil l it s obligatio n o fnotification . Whe n FedE xhas accepte d th e package , h e didn' t pu t forwar d an yobjection s relatin g t o th e classification , description , mar k

an d labe l regardin g t o th e shipment . (4 ) A s a n internationa l an d reputabl e expedite d deliverycompany . Fed E xshoul d have refuse d t o accep t th e shipment , whic h di d no t compl ywit h th e order s o f destinatio n country . (5 ) I fFedE xaccep t th e packag e withou t an yobjection , Halloche m has th e reaso n t o believ e tha t th e packag e satisfyal l th e requirement s o fth e U.S.A . 14 . Ite m 1 4 o fth e Complaint : den y (1 ) W e mus t emphasiz e tha t Halloche m i s no t th e tru e consigno rActually , i t i s th e Alf a Aesa rwh o offere d th e shipmen t t o th e Fed Ex . Alf a Aesa rshoul d responsibl e fo rfulfillin g al l th e procedure s fo rimport . (2 ) Whe n w e handove rth e shipmen t t o FedEx , Halloche m hav e clearl y describe d th e quantit yo fth e shipmen t w e offere d jus t cos t $ 110 0 th e quantit yo f whic h i s 2 5 kg . 15 . Ite m 1 5 o fth e Complaint : den y (1 ) W e mus t emphasiz e tha t Halloche m i s no t th e tru e consigno rActually , i t i s th e Alf a Aesa rwh o offere d th e shipmen t t o th e Fed Ex . Alf a Aesa rshoul d responsibl e fo rfulfillin g al l th e procedure s fo rimport . (2 ) W e understan d tha t Antimon y(III ) i s a kin d o fchemica l substance . Actually , w e have require d Alf a Aesa rt o provid e th e certificatio n fo rentry . Whe n w e reac h th e Purchas e Orde rwit h Alf a Aesar , o n th e basi s o fou rrequirement , Alf a Aesa rissue d a"Toxi cSubstanc e Contro l Ac t Certification" . Then , Halloche m delivere d th e

above-describe d shipmen t t o FedE xafte rHalloche m go t th e certificat e issue d b yAlf a Aesa rSince Alf a Aesa ri s a n US compan yan d th e shipmen t w e delivere d i s th e sampl e th e quantit yo fwhic h i s jus t 25kg , w e have everyreaso n t o believ e tha t Alf a Aesar' s certificatio n i s tru e an d th e above-describe d shipmen t fo rentr yi s no t i n violatio n o fan yapplicabl e rul e o rorde rhereunde r (3 ) Afte rHalloche m receive d th e Certification , Halloche m the n agree d t o delive r Antimon y(III ) t o FedE xpursuan t t o th e Purchas e Orde r (4 ) A s mentione d above , no wtha t i n th e purchase d orde rw e an d Alf a Aesa r choos e th e FOB term , w e onl yhav e th e obligatio n t o shi p th e good s t o th e por t o f th e seller , afte rthat , i t i s th e Purchase rwh o i s responsibl e fo rth e shipmen t fro m th e por t o fth e Selle rt o th e destination . Therefore , Alf a Aesa ra s th e purchase rshoul d dea l wit h th e procedure s fo rentr y.Base d o n th e certificatio n o fth e Alf a Asear , w e ca n believ e tha t th e shipmen t fo rtransportatio n has go t al l th e require d certification . 16 . Ite m 1 6 o fth e Complaint : den y (1 ) I n vie wo fFOB ter m i n th e purchas e order , i t i s th e obligatio n o fAlf a Aesa rt o tak e charg e o fth e shipmen t fro m Chin a t o th e destinatio n i n th e U.S.A . Afte r Halloche m has delivere d th e good s i n China , the n Alf a Aesa rshal l tak e al l th e risk s an d othe rresponsibilities . (2 ) A s th e rea l shippe ro fthi s transportation , Alf a Aesa rshoul d provid e th e copie s o fth e require d shipper' s certificatio n rathe rtha n us . 17 . Ite m 1 7 o fth e complaint : den y (1 ) W e mus t emphasiz e tha t Halloche m i s no t th e tru e consigno rActually , i t i s th e Alf a Aesa rwh o offere d th e shipmen t t o th e Fed Ex . Alf a Aesa rshoul d responsibl e fo rfulfillin g al l th e procedure s fo rimport . (2 ) Fed E

xfaile d t o fulfil l it s obligatio n o fnotification . Whe n FedExhas accepte d th e package , h e didn' t pu t forwar d an yobjection s relatin g t o th e classification , description , mar k

an d labe l regardin g t o th e shipment . (3 ) A s a n internationa l an d reputabl e expedite d deliverycompany . Fed E xshoul d

*6 - ^u . -ffj - 4 + J T ^have refuse d t o accep t th e shipment , whic h di d no t compl ywit h th e order s o f

destinatio n country . (4 ) I fFedExaccep t th e packag e withou t an yobjection , Halloche m has th e reaso n t o believ e tha t th e packag e satisfyal l th e requirement s o fth e U.S.A . 18 . Ite m 1 8 o fth e complaint : den y (1 ) W e mus t emphasiz e th e fac t tha t Halloche m i s no t th e consigno rActually , i t i s th e Alf a Aesa rwh o offere d th e shipmen t t o th e Fed Ex . (2 ) Whe n w e handove rth e shipmen t t o FedEx , Halloche m hav e clearl y describe d th e nam e o fth e substanc e t o b e transported , whic h i s Antimony(lll) . (3 ) A s a n internationa l an d reputabl e expedite d deliver ycompany . Fed E xshoul d have refuse d t o accep t th e shipment , whic h di d no t compl ywit h th e order s o f destinatio n country . (4 ) I fFedE xaccep t th e packag e withou t an yobjection , Halloche m has th e reaso n t o believ e tha t th e packag e satisfyal l th e requirement s o fth e U.S.A . 19 . Ite m 19o fth e complaint : den y (1 ) W e mus t emphasiz e tha t Halloche m i s no t th e tru e consigno rActually , i t i s th e Alf a Aesa rwh o offere d th e shipmen t t o th e Fed Ex . Alf a Aesa rshoul d responsibl e fo rfulfillin g al l th e procedure s fo rimport . (2 ) Whe n FedE xhas accepte d th e package , h e didn' t pu t forwar d an yobjection s relatin g t o th e classification , description , mar k an d labe l regardin g t o th e shipment . (3 ) A s a n internationa l an d reputabl e expedite d deliverycompany . Fed E xshoul d have refuse d t o accep t th e shipment , whic h di d no t compl ywit h th e order s o f destinatio n country . (4 ) I fFedE xaccep t th e packag e withou t an yobjection , Halloche m has th e reaso n t o believ e tha t th e packag e satisfyal l th e requirement s o fth e U.S.A . 20 . Ite m 2 0 o fth e complaint : den y (1 ) W e mus t emphasiz e tha t Halloche m i s no t th e tru e consigno rActually , i t i s th e Alf a Aesa rwh o offere d th e shipmen t t o th e Fed Ex . Alf a Aesa rshoul d responsibl efo rfulfillin g al l th e procedure s fo rimport . (2 ) Whe n FedE xhas accepte d th e package , h e didn' t pu t forwar d an yobjection s relatin g t o th e classification , description , mar k an d labe l regardin g t o th e shipment . (3 ) A s a n internationa l an d reputabl e expedite d deliverycompany . Fed E xshoul d have refuse d t o accep t th e shipment , whic h di d no t compl ywit h th e order s o f destinatio n country . (4 ) I fFedE xaccep t th e packag e withou t an yobjection , Halloche m has th e reaso n t o believ e tha t th e packag e satisfyal l th e requirement s o fth e U.S.A . 21 . Ite m 2 1 o fth e complaint : den y (1 ) A s th e abov e mentioned , FOB i s adopte d i n th e internationa l trade . I t i s th e purchaser' s obligatio n t o appoin t th e carrier , th e selle rshal l onl yhav e th e obligatio n t o handove rth e good s t o th e carrie rI n thi s case , i t i s th e obligatio n o fAlf a Aesa rt o tak e charg e o fth e shipmen t fro m Chin a t o th e destinatio n i n th e U.S.A . Afte r Halloche m has delivere d th e good s i n China , the n Alf a Aesa rshal l tak e al l th e risks an d othe rresponsibilities . (2 ) Therefore , Alf a Aesa rrathe rus , shoul d make emergencyrespons e informatio n immediatel yavailabl e fo ruse . 22 . Ite m 2 2 o fth e complaint : den y (1 ) W e mus t emphasiz e tha t Halloche m i s no t th e tru e consigno rActually , i t i s th e Alf a Aesa rwh o offere d th e shipmen t t o th e Fed Ex . Alf a Aesa rshoul d responsibl e fo rfulfillin g al l th e procedure s fo rimport . (2 ) W e hav e performe d ou rreasonabl e care accordin g t o th e purchas e orde ri n goo d faith . (3 ) Whe n FedE xhas accepte d th e package , h e didn' t pu t forwar d an yobjection s relatin g t o th e classification , description , mar k an d labe l regardin g t o th e shipment . (4 ) A s a n internationa l an d reputabl e expedite d deliverycompany . Fed E xshoul d have refuse d t o accep t th e shipment , whic h di d no t compl ywit h th e order s o f destinatio n country .

•Se rl \ Yi i ± h I •(5 ) I fFedE xaccep t th e packag e withou t an yobjection , Halloche m has th e

reaso n t o believ e tha t th e packag e satisfyal l th e requirement s o fth e U.S.A . 23 . Ite m 2 3 o fth e complaint : den y (1 ) We mus t emphasiz e tha t Halloche m i s no t th e tru e consigno rActually , i t i s th e Alf a Aesa rwh o offere d th e shipmen t t o th e Fed Ex . Alf a Aesa rshoul d responsibl e fo rfulfillin g al l th e procedure s fo rimport . (2 ) A s a n internationa l an d reputabl e expedite d deliverycompany . Fed E xshoul d have refuse d t o accep t th e shipment , whic h di d no t compl ywit h th e order s o f destinatio n country . (3 ) I fFedExaccep t th e packag e withou t an yobjection , Halloche m ha s th e reaso n t o believ e tha t th e packag e satisfyal l th e requirement s o fth e U.S.A . 24 . Ite m 24o fth e Complaint : den y (1 ) W e mus t emphasiz e tha t Halloche m i s no t th e tru e consigno rActually , i t i s th e Alf a Aesa rwh o offere d th e shipmen t t o th e Fed Ex . Alf a Aesa rshoul d responsibl e fo rfulfillin g al l th e procedure s fo rimport . (2 ) W e fee l sorryt o th e ba d effec t cause d b yth e leakag e t o th e environment . We believ e i t i s a n accident . W e promis e tha t w e wil l d o ou rbes t t o avoi d thi s kin d o f acciden t t o happe n again . 25 . Ite m 24o fth e Complaint : den y Alf a Aesa r, rathe rtha n Hallochem , i s th e actua l consigno rfo rth e shipment . (1 ) O n Apri l IS**' , 2009 , Halloche m has reache d a Purchas e Orde rwit h Alf a Aesa r Accordin g t o tha t Purchas e Order , Alf a Aesa rhas purchase d 25K G Antimon y(III) , an d th e partie s hav e chose n th e FOB terms . A s w e al l know , i fFOB i s adopte d i n th e internationa l trade , i t i s th e purchaser' s obligatio n t o appoin t th e carrier.Tth e selle r shal l onl yhave th e obligatio n t o handove rth e good s t o th e carrie ran d prepar e al l th e formalitie s fo rexportation . Afte rthat , i t i s th e Purchase rwh o i s responsibl e fo r th e shipmen t especiall yfo rfinis h th e procedure s fo rentry . I n thi s case , i t i s th e obligatio n o fAlf a Aesa rt o appoin t th e carrie ran d tak e charg e o fth e shipmen t fro m

*ft - i . T ^Chin a t o th e destinatio n i n th e U.S.A . Afte rHalloche m has delivere d th e good s i n

China , the n Alf a Aesa rshal l tak e al l th e risk s an d othe rresponsibilities . Therefore , w e believ e tha t i t i s unfai rt o penaliz e Hallochem . (2 ) Mor e importantly , i n th e abov e mentione d purchas e contract , Alf a Aesa rha s clearl yrequire d tha t th e good s shal l b e shippe d vi a FedEx , an d Alf a Aesa rha s tol d Halloche m hi s Accoun t Numbe ro fFedE x(1319-3098-4 ) i n th e Purchas e Orde r Pursuan t t o tha t purchas e contract , Halloche m delivere d th e good s (Antimon y(III ) t o FedEx , an d FedE xshippe d the m t o Alf a Aesa rTh e carriag e fe e aros e fro m th e shipmen t wa s als o pai d b yAlf a Aesa rObviously , althoug h Halloche m "offered " th e good s t o FedEx , Halloche m i s no t th e tru e consigno rW e thin k i t i s absolutel ywron g an d unfai rt o propos e th e penalt yt o Halloche m i n suc h a larg e amount . 26 . ite m 2 6 o fth e Complaint : den y A s abov e mentioned , Halloche m i s no t th e rea l consignor , unfai rt o propos e th e penalt yt o Halloche m i n suc h a larg e amount . 27 . Ite m 2 7 o fth e Complaint : den y (1 ) Base d o n th e forgoing , Alf a Aesa ri s th e actua l consigno rfo rth e shipment . (2 ) I t i s ou rfirs t tim e t o sig n th e contrac t th e subject-matte ro fwhic h i s th e chemica l substance , wit h th e US Company . Besides , th e shipmen t w e delivere d i s onl yth e sampl e th e quantit yo fwhic h i s 2 5 kg . Fo rou rlac k o fexperiences , firstl yw e believ e tha t Alf a Aesar' s certificatio n i s reliabl e an d th e above-describe d shipmen t fo rentr yi s no t i n violatio n o fan yapplicabl e rul e o rorde ri n US . Secondly , sinc e Fed E xdidn' t pu t forwar d an yobjection s fo rpackagin g whe n w e describe d th e nam e o f th e substance , w e understan d tha t th e packagin g fo rth e above-describe d shipmen t satisfyth e US requirements . (3 ) W e fee l sorryt o th e ba d effec t cause d b yth e leakag e t o th e environment . W e believ e i t i s a n accident . Actually , FAA' s penalt yintend s t o dra wou rattentio n t o th e regulation s relatin g t o entr yformalitie s i n US . W e have realize d ou rnegligenc e durin g thi s transportatio n an d promis e tha t w e wil l rigorousl yobserv e th e rule s an d regulation s o fUS .« 

## y (4 ) I n addition , th e sampl e w e delivere d jus t cos t $ 110 0 .Wit h suc h a smal l

amount , th e FAA's civi l penalt yi n th e amoun t o f$ 42,00 0 i s to o high . Base d o n th e foregoing , w e request s tha t th e Administrativ e La wJudg e coul d orde rth e FA

At o remi t th e fine . I fFA Ahas t o impos e fine s o n us , w e requir e th e FA A t o reduc e th e amoun t pf^th e penalty . /'. • / / Halloche m PRarm a Co,,Ltit. " j President'• ' 'A s 

### ' N ; ' H

Halloche m PharmaCo.,Ltd . 17F,Venu s Scienc e Incubat e Cente r No.eOXingguan g Road , Ne wNort h Zon e Chongqing,Chin a 40112 1

t K I - iJi 4 t

I -