Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2019
                              Ethan E. Bickelhaupt, M.D., DAB CR5349 (2019)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Ethan E. Bickelhaupt, M.D., DAB CR5349 (2019)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Ethan E. Bickelhaupt, M.D.,
	(NPI: 1760427389),
	Petitioner,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-19-337Decision No. CR5349June 19, 2019

        
              
    

      DECISION
Petitioner, Ethan E. Bickelhaupt, M.D., is a psychiatrist, who practices in the State of Kansas.  He participated in the Medicare program until September 20, 2011, when the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services (IG) excluded him from participating in federal health care programs.  The IG took this action because Petitioner Bickelhaupt was convicted of felony offenses related to the unlawful manufacture, distribution, prescription, or dispensing of a controlled substance.  Petitioner recently applied for re-enrollment in the program but, because of his felony conviction, and because he did not report that conviction on his Medicare application, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) denied him re-enrollment.  Petitioner now appeals the denial.
I find that CMS is authorized to deny Petitioner Bickelhaupt’s re-enrollment application because, within the ten years preceding his filing, he was convicted of felonies that CMS reasonably determined are detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries.  I therefore affirm CMS’s determination.
Page 2
Background
By letter dated August 6, 2018, the Medicare contractor, Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance Corporation, denied Petitioner Bickelhaupt’s application for enrollment in the Medicare program.  CMS Exhibit (Ex.) 2.  The contractor based its denial on 42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(3) and 424.530(a)(4) and cited two factors:  1) Petitioner was convicted of two drug-related felonies; and 2) he did not specifically disclose those convictions on his application.  CMS Ex. 2 at 1.
Petitioner requested reconsideration.  In a reconsidered determination, dated November 1, 2018, a CMS hearing officer upheld the denial, concluding that:
Petitioner was convicted of felony offenses that CMS determined are “detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries”; and
	On his application for re-enrollment, Petitioner certified, as true, information that was, in fact, misleading or false, in that he failed to disclose all final adverse legal actions imposed against him, specifically, his felony convictions.CMS Ex. 4. Petitioner appealed, and that appeal is now before me.
CMS moves for summary judgment.  CMS proposes no witnesses.  Petitioner lists two witnesses:  himself and the CMS hearing officer who decided the reconsidered determination.  CMS has not asked to cross-examine Petitioner.  *See* Acknowledgment and Pre-hearing Order at 5 (¶ 9).  For reasons discussed below, I have denied Petitioner’s request that I subpoena the CMS hearing officer.  Because there are no witnesses to be further examined or cross-examined, an in-person hearing would serve no purpose.  *See* Acknowledgment and Pre-hearing Order at 5-6 (¶¶ 8, 9, 10).  The matter may therefore be decided based on the written record, without considering whether the standards for summary judgment are satisfied.1
CMS has submitted its motion and brief (CMS Br.), along with six exhibits (CMS Exs. 1-6).  Although given ample opportunity to do so, Petitioner did not respond to CMS’s motion and brief, but has submitted four exhibits (P. Exs. 1-4).  In the absence of any other objections, I admit into evidence CMS Exs. 1-6 and P. Exs. 1-4.
Page 3
Discussion
**Petitioner’s subpoena request**.  Petitioner asked that I subpoena the CMS hearing officer so that he can question her about “what, if any, steps CMS undertook in making a ‘case by case determination’ regarding whether Petitioner’s conviction provided a legal basis to deny his enrollment application.”  Petitioner’s Request for Issuance of a Subpoena at 3 (¶ 12).  CMS opposes my issuing the subpoena.
I deny Petitioner’s request for two reasons:  1) the testimony he seeks is irrelevant; and 2) CMS’s deliberative processes are privileged.
I may issue a subpoena if it is reasonably necessary “for the full presentation of a case.”  42 C.F.R. § 498.58(a).  I receive into evidence witness testimony that is relevant and material.  42 C.F.R. § 498.60(b).  Here, my review is limited to whether CMS had the authority to deny Petitioner’s enrollment.  If so, I must affirm the denial; I may not review the processes by which CMS exercised its discretion to deny enrollment.  *See* discussion, below.  The hearing officer’s testimony is therefore irrelevant.
Moreover, because I review this matter *de novo*, the process by which CMS arrived at its conclusions is irrelevant.  *See* *Fady Fayad*, *M.D.*, DAB No. 2266 at 11-12 (2009) (holding that the *de novo* proceeding before an ALJ cured alleged deficiencies of the reconsidered determination), *aff’d, Fayad v. Sebelius,* 803 F. Supp. 2d 699 (E.D. Mich. 2011); *accord Heckler v. Campbell*, 461 U.S. 458, 462 n.6 (1983) (holding that hearings held pursuant to section 205(b) of the Social Security Act are *de novo*).
In any event, the testimony sought is privileged. Petitioner is not entitled to discover an agency’s (or a hearing officer’s) internal deliberations.
***CMS may deny Petitioner enrollment in the Medicare program because, within the last ten years, he was convicted of felonies that CMS reasonably finds detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries. 42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(3)***.2
**Statute and regulations**. CMS may deny a provider’s or supplier’s enrollment in the Medicare program if, within the preceding ten years, he was convicted of a felony offense that CMS “has determined to be detrimental to the best interests of the program and its beneficiaries.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(3); *see also* Act §§ 1842(h)(8) (authorizing the Secretary to deny enrollment to a physician who has been convicted of a felony offense that the Secretary has determined is “detrimental to the best interests of the program or program beneficiaries”) and 1866(b)(2)(D) (authorizing the Secretary to deny enrollment
Page 4
after he ascertains that the provider has been convicted of a felony that he “determines is detrimental to the best interests of the program or program beneficiaries”).
Offenses for which billing privileges may be denied include – but are not limited to –financial crimes such as extortion, embezzlement, income tax evasion, insurance fraud, and similar crimes; a felony that places the Medicare program or its beneficiaries at immediate risk (such as malpractice); and “[a]ny felonies that would result in mandatory exclusion under section 1128(a) of the Act.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(3)(i)(B), (C), (D).  Section 1128 crimes include:  program-related crimes; crimes related to the neglect or abuse of patients in connection with the delivery of a health care item or service; crimes relating to health care fraud; and *crimes relating to the unlawful manufacture, distribution, prescription, or dispensing of a controlled substance*.  *See* 42 C.F.R. § 1001.101.
**Petitioner’s felony offenses**.  On September 2, 2010, Petitioner Bickelhaupt was convicted on two felony counts:  1) of knowingly and intentionally distributing and dispensing a controlled substance, outside the scope of professional practice and for no legitimate medical purpose, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C); and 2) acquiring or obtaining a controlled substance by misrepresentation, fraud, forgery, deception, or subterfuge, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(a)(3) and (d).  CMS Ex. 3; P. Ex. 4 at 1-2 (Bickelhaupt Dec. ¶¶ 6, 7); *see Ethan Edwin Bickelhaupt, M.D.*, DAB CR2554 (2012), *aff’d*, DAB No. 2480 (2012).
Because of these convictions, the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (IG) excluded him from participating in all federal health care programs for a minimum period of five years.  P. Ex. 2; P. Ex. 4 at 3 (Bickelhaupt Decl. ¶¶ 13, 14).  Section 1128(a)(4) of the Act mandates that the IG exclude from program participation any individual or entity convicted of a felony “relating to the unlawful manufacture, distribution, prescription, or dispensing of a controlled substance.”  *See* 42 C.F.R. § 1001.101(d).
The five years passed, and Petitioner requested reinstatement.  In a letter dated October 18, 2016, the IG approved his request and recommended that he contact his Medicare contractor to determine his options for participating in the program.  P. Ex. 1.
**Petitioner’s re-enrollment application**.  In an application filed on July 18, 2018, Petitioner applied for re-enrollment in the Medicare program.  CMS Ex. 1.  He disclosed his exclusion (writing “OIG Sanctioned”), but did not mention his felony convictions.  CMS Ex. 1 at 3.
Pointing to the IG’s approval of his reinstatement request, his ongoing sobriety, his personal accomplishments, his employer’s and patients’ need for his services, and his
Page 5
generally good character, Petitioner maintains that his Medicare enrollment should be allowed and that CMS abused its discretion in denying it.  CMS Exs. 3, 5, 6; P. Exs. 1, 3.
Exclusion under section 1128 and denial of enrollment under 42 C.F.R. § 424.530 (as authorized by sections 1842(h)(8) and 1866(b)(2)(D) of the Act) are separate and distinct enforcement tools, each with its own requirements and consequences.  *See Fayad,* DAB No. 2266 at 12, *citing Abdul Razzaque Ahmed, M.D.*, DAB No. 2261 at 13 (2009).  That the IG may have imposed a minimum period of exclusion does not preclude CMS from making its own, independent determination regarding a supplier’s re-enrollment.  Indeed, the statute and regulations mandate that it do so.
My review authority here is limited.  I may determine whether the regulatory elements required for denial of enrollment under section 424.530(a) are present, and, if the record establishes that they are, I must affirm.  *John A. Hartman*, *D.O.*, DAB No. 2911 at 17 (2018); *Douglas Bradley, M.D.*, DAB No. 2663 at 6-7, 13-14 (2015) and cases cited therein.  By regulation, Petitioner’s felony offenses *are* detrimental to the best interests of the program and its beneficiaries.  Not only did he abuse his position as a psychiatrist, authorized to prescribe controlled substances, to obtain drugs for himself, his crimes subjected him to exclusion under section 1128(a).  *See Bickelhaupt,* DAB CR2554 at 5.  Because Petitioner’s conviction was among those specifically enumerated in section 424.530(a)(3), CMS may deny his Medicare enrollment without regard to equitable or other factors.  *See Fayad,* DAB No. 2266 at 15-17.
Thus, CMS justifiably determined that Petitioner was convicted of felonies detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries and may deny his enrollment in the Medicare program.  Because this, by itself, justifies the denial of enrollment, I need not consider whether Petitioner also filed a misleading enrollment application (although he unquestionably did not reveal his felony convictions).
Conclusion
CMS may deny Petitioner Bickelhaupt’s Medicare enrollment application because he was convicted of felonies that CMS reasonably determined are detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries.  I therefore affirm CMS’s determination.


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. That I decide this case based on the written record does not mean that Petitioner has not had a hearing. Courts recognize that, although a case may be decided on summary judgment or based on the written record, the administrative law judge, by considering the evidence and applying the law, has granted the petitioner a hearing, as required by sections 205(b) and 1866(h) of the Social Security Act (Act). See CNG Transmission Corp. v. FERC, 40 F.3d 1289, 1293 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (holding that a “paper hearing” satisfies statutory requirements for “notice and opportunity for hearing.”). back to note 1
                      2. I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law to support my decision. back to note 2 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back