alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mr. John S. Hovenga OpinionNo. C-512

ExecutiveDirector Board of Regents of State Re: Whether or not the reTeachers Colleges quirementsof Article Sam Houston State Office Bldg. 266313-2, Vernon's Civil Austin, TeXaS Statutes,are met by stud.ents

who take and pass an advanced standing examinationin American History and Texas Dear Mr. Hovenga: History?

We are in receipt of your letter requestingan opinion from this office on the above captionedquestion.

Senate Bill 254, Acts 54th Legislature, Regular Session, 1955, **Is** codifiedas Article 2663b-2, Vernon's Civil Statutea. Section 1, Article 2663b-2, Vernon's Civil Statutes, is quoted as follows:

'Section1. No person after July 1, 195& shall be granted an undergraduatedegree of any kind from any Institutionof higher learning supported or maintainedby the State of TeXaB, or from any junior college receiving state aid, except that he or Bhe has taken and pasaed six semester hours in American History provided that any student shall have the option, at his or her request, to substitutethree semester hours,of Texas History for three of the six semesterhours in American **HlBtory** required by the terms of this Act." The answer to your pestion requires 2 determination of the meaning of the phrase taken and passed, as such phrase appears in the context of Section 1, Article 2663b-2,Vernon's Civil Statutes<

-2413-Mr. John S. Hovenga,page 2 (C-512)

It is our opinion that the plain and unambiguous language of Section 1, supra, requires the taking and. passing of courseB of instructionconsistingof six semesterhours in AmericanHistory or the sum of three semesterhours in American History and three semesterhours in Texas History. This requirement may not be met by taking and passing advanced standingexaminations in American or Texas History by those who have not taken and passed the courses required in Section 1.

In Volume 53, Tex.Jur.2d,Statutes, I\164, p. 2&O241, It is stated,:

"If the language of a statute is unambiguous, and its meaning IB clear, the statutewill be construedand given effect accordingto its terms. In such a case, the court is not concernedwith the policy or wisdom of the act, nor with the probabilitythat its operationfill entail disaBtroUS or miSchieVOUBresults.

SUMMARY Under the provisionsof Section 1, Article 2663b-2, Vernon's Civil Statutes,a studentwho takes and passes an advanced standingexamination in the field of AmericanHistory or Texas History does not fulfill the requirementsof such statute by merely passing such examination. Very truly yours, WAGGONER CARR Attorney General

1RWjr:mkh
APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE

w. 0. Shultz, Chairman John Reeves Harold Kennedy Sam Kelley " Ivan R. Williams,Jr. 1 Assistant

APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: T. B. Wright

-2414-
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 131 (Monday, July 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14555]



[[Page 31742]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Number: PR18-62-000.
    Applicants: Rocky Mountain Natural Gas LLC.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: Rocky Mountain 
Natural Gas LLC SOC Filing to be effective 6/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 6/26/18.
    Accession Number: 20180626-5073.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/17/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-909-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Cherokee 
AGL--Replacement Shippers--Jul 2018 to be effective 7/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 6/27/18.
    Accession Number: 20180627-5033.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/9/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-910-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate--Boston Gas to 
BBPC 796772 to be effective 7/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 6/27/18.
    Accession Number: 20180627-5073.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/9/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-911-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate--Noble Energy 
#8951606 eff 7-1-18 to be effective 7/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 6/27/18.
    Accession Number: 20180627-5114.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/9/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: June 28, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14555 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Dennis J. KELSO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-284.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 8, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32-2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of The Goldfield Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen R.
Wherry, Senior Vice President, Treasurer, Assistant Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Goldfield Corporation and will be retained by The Goldfield Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ STEPHEN R. WHERRYStephen R. WherrySenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer), Treasurer and Assistant SecretaryMay 13, 2008




26
# C_2022084EN.01002401.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vredegerecht te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 11 November 2021 — Fluvius Antwerpen v MX

(Case C-677/21)

(2022/C 84/31)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Vredegerecht te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Fluvius Antwerpen

Defendant: MX

Questions referred

Must Article 2(1)(a), read in conjunction with Article 14(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC, (1) be interpreted as meaning that the unlawful usage of energy is a supply of goods, being the transfer of the right to dispose of tangible property as owner?

If not, must Article 14(2)(a) of Directive 2006/112/EC be interpreted as meaning that the unlawful usage of energy is a supply of goods, being a transfer, by order made by or in the name of a public authority or in pursuance of the law, of the ownership of property against payment of compensation?

Must Article 9(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC be interpreted as meaning that, if Fluvius Antwerpen is entitled to compensation for unlawfully used energy, it is to be regarded as a taxable person since the unlawful usage is the result of an ‘economic activity’ of Fluvius Antwerpen, namely the exploitation of tangible property for the purposes of obtaining income therefrom on a continuing basis?

If Article 9(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC must be interpreted as meaning that the unlawful usage of energy constitutes an economic activity, must the first paragraph of Article 13(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC then be interpreted as meaning that Fluvius Antwerpen is a public authority and, if so, must the third paragraph of Article 13(1) then be interpreted as meaning that the unlawful usage of energy is the result of an activity of Fluvius Antwerpen that is not carried out on such a small scale as to be negligible?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

---
#### Jimmie NARRON, Petitioner, v. Robert E. EGGERS and Richardson Tractor Company, Respondents.

No. 41921.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 17, 1972.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1972.

Sam D. Phillips, Jr., of Phillips & Babbitt, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert M. Montgomery, Jr., of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto, Dean & Hal-lowes, Jacksonville, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, has certified that its decision in this cause is one passing upon a question of great public interest. Article V, Section 4(2), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. The factual circumstances, background and the question involved are set forth in the *214decision of the District Court reported at 254 So.2d 382 (4th D.C.A. Fla.1971). For the order certifying the question as requested in Rupp v. Jackson, 238 So.2d 86 (Fla.1970), see 256 So.2d 22.

We have reviewed the decision below, the record in the cause, the briefs of counsel, and' have heard oral argument. It is our judgment that the decision of the District Court appropriately disposes of the issue raised. See also, Adkins, Florida Criminal and Civil Discovery, § 3-24, at page 118 (1970). Accordingly, the opinion certified is approved as the response of this Court.

The writ of certiorari is discharged.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### Sylvester Lee LEE v. STATE.

No. 38824.

Supreme Court *of*Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Burt Sugarman, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the second quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (“Quarterly Report”) of GIANT GROUP, LTD.(“Company” or “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this Quarterly Report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for the periods presented in thisQuarterly Report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I amresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to us during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this QuarterlyReport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period ended of June 30, 2004 covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting;and 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s independent auditor and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Fischer Imaging Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DavidKirwan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Date: March  31, 2006 | /s/    DAVID KIRWAN         |   |
|--------|----------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                       | David Kirwan*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
| (1) | the                Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the Three Months Ended                September                30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of                Section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects,                the financial condition and results of operations of the Company                as                of and for the periods presented in the                Report. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                               |   |   |                                                                                                                               |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                               |   |   |                                                                                                                               |
| By:    | /s/ John              W. Burns                                                                                                |   | By:    | /s/ Bradley              J. Carver                                                                                            |
|   |                                                                                                                                    |   |   |                                                                                                                                    |
|   | Name:                  John W. BurnsTitle:       SVP, CFO              Secretary |   |   | Name:                  Bradley J. CarverTitle:       CEO,              President |

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    The Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended
January 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
the Company.
  /s/ Robert A. Virtue

Robert A. VirtuePresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of theBoard (Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Robert E. Dose

Vice President  Finance, Secretary and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT NO. 10.6

 

MEMORANDUM

 

 

To:  Marc T. Giles

From:  Edward E. Hood, Jr., Chairman

Management Development and Compensation Committee

Re:  Appointments 

Gerber Scientific, Inc. (the "Company")

Date:  December 7, 2001 

 

On November 29, 2001, the Board of Directors of Gerber Scientific, Inc. (the "Board") appointed you President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a Director of the Company.  Effective November 30, 2001, the Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Board (the "Committee") has set your base salary at $345,000 per year, payable in accordance with the regular payroll practices of the Company for executives, less applicable deductions.  The Committee has also set your bonus target under the Company's 2000-2004 Executive Annual Incentive Bonus Plan (the "Executive Bonus Plan") at 75%.  Further, the Committee, effective December 7, 2001, has awarded you options to purchase 50,000 shares of the Common Stock of the Company, pursuant to the Company's 1992 Employee Stock Plan.  

For the fiscal year ending April 30, 2002, your bonus will be calculated as follows:  for the period May 1, 2001 through November 30, 2001, your bonus will be based on the Gerber Technology, Inc. results and the target will be 50% of the pro rata portion of your base salary as of April 30, 2001; for the period December 1, 2001 through April 30, 2002, your bonus will be based on the results at Gerber Scientific, Inc., and the target will be 75% of the pro rata portion of your base salary as of April 30, 2002.

You will retain the title of President and CEO of Gerber Technology, Inc. until such time as a successor is appointed.  

If this memorandum sets forth our agreement on the subject matter hereof, kindly sign and return to the Company the enclosed copy of this memorandum, which will then constitute our agreement on this subject.

 

 

Edward E. Hood, Jr., Chairman

Management Development and

Compensation Committee 

of the Board of Directors 

Agreed this 13th day of December, 2001. 

 

____________________________

Marc T. Giles
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2010

p0621 

# Order

June 28, 2010

140347 & (31) (34)

CURTIS TATE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140347 COA: 294071 Ingham CC: 09-000727-AA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 4, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions
for miscellaneous relief are DENIED.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1006

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel Arbitrage II.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 20 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel

Arbitrage II.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 for the vessel Arbitrage II, United States official number

9 962861.

Æ