alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 130 (Friday, July 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31568-31569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14472]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1103 (Second Review)]


Certain Activated Carbon From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on certain 
activated carbon from China would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 
1675(c)), instituted this review on February 1, 2018 (83 FR 4681) and 
determined on May 7, 2018 that it would conduct an expedited review (83 
FR 24345, May 25, 2018).
    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determination in this review on June 29, 2018. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4797 (June 2018), 
entitled Certain Activated Carbon from

[[Page 31569]]

China: Investigation No. 731-TA-1103 (Second Review).

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: June 29, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-14472 Filed 7-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
# C_2020255EN.01002701.xml

| 3.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/27

---

Action brought on 8 June 2020 — Jiruš v EUIPO — Nile Clothing (Racing Syndicate)

(Case T-356/20)

(2020/C 255/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Václav Jiruš (Vitín, Czech Republic) (represented by: J. Zedníková, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nile Clothing AG (Sutz, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Racing Syndicate — European Union trade mark No 11 801 065

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 March 2020 in Case R 1488/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and refer the case back for reconsideration; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and refer the case back for reconsideration;

| — | oblige the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to compensate the applicant for all costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

oblige the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to compensate the applicant for all costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 72(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 72(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 511

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a rollcall

vote on passage of any measure making appropriations, providing revenue, or increasing the statutory limit on the public debt, and in certain

other instances.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 8, 1994

Mr. SANTORUM submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

require a rollcall vote on passage of any measure making

appropriations, providing revenue, or increasing the statutory limit on the public debt, and in certain other

instances.

1 Resolved, That (a) this resolutuion may be cited as

2 the ‘‘Taxpayers’ Right to Know Resolution’’.

3 (b) Rule XV of the Rules of the House of Representa4 tives is amended by inserting at the end the following new

5 clause:

6 ‘‘7. (a) It shall not be in order in the House or in

7 the Committee of the Whole to pass or adopt, as the case
2

•HRES 511 IH

1 may be, any bill or joint resolution, or conference report

2 thereon, described in paragraph (c) except by rollcall vote,

3 a quorum being present, and the yeas and nays shall be

4 considered as ordered.

5 ‘‘(b) It shall not be in order in any committee to order

6 reported any bill or joint resolution described in subpara7 graph (c) except by rollcall vote, approved by a majority

8 of the members voting, a quorum being present.

9 ‘‘(c) Subparagraphs (a) and (b) apply to bills and

10 joint resolutions that—

11 ‘‘(1) make or continue an appropriation;

12 ‘‘(2) increase the statutory limit on the public

13 debt;

14 ‘‘(3) amend the Congressional Budget and Im15 poundment Control Act of 1974 or the Balanced

16 Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985

17 or change the congressional budget process;

18 ‘‘(4) provide revenue;

19 ‘‘(5) establish, extend, or raise any user fee; or

20 ‘‘(6) authorize the enactment of new budget au21 thority.’’.

Æ
# C_2020279EN.01006001.xml

| 24.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/60

---

Action brought on 8 July 2020 — Sedus Stoll v EUIPO — Kappes (Sedus ergo+)

(Case T-429/20)

(2020/C 279/74)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Sedus Stoll AG (Dogern, Germany) (represented by: M. Goldmann and J. Thomsen)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wolfgang Kappes (Bochum, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ — Application for registration No 144 074 98

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 March 2020 in Case R 1303/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | dismiss the appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division in Case B 2 863 929; and |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss the appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division in Case B 2 863 929; and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union and order the potential intervener (Wolfgang Kappes) to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union and order the potential intervener (Wolfgang Kappes) to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings before EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
| 1.   | The name of the corporation (hereinafter the “Corporation”) is ImageWare Systems, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The reference to “2,000” in Section 2 of the Corporation’s Certificate of Designation of Series D 8% Convertible Preferred Stock is hereby deleted and replaced with “3,000”. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | The amendment herein certified has been duly adopted and written consent has been given in accordance with the provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Brian C. Smith Jr.

SHERMAN UAS

5 Locust Lane

Sherman, CT 06784

860-350-2473

January 21, 2016

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal 

Aviation Regulations from 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 CFR Part 21; 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b); 

91.7 (a); 91.9 (b) (2); 91.103(b); 91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a) & (b); 

91.405 (a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.417 (a) & (b).

Dear Sir or Madam:

I tried to upload the Operators manual for the DJI Phantom 3 Professional as part of my 333 

exemption package. The file size is 13.2 Mb and will not upload to the Regulations.gov website 

as it’s too large. 

The operator’s manual for the DJI Phantom 3 Professional as well as the quick start manual are 

available online at http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-3/download.

If you have any questions, please contact me at the information above. 

Sincerely,

Brian C. Smith Jr.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000938145
<NAME> EASCO,INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                          13,245
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,478
<INVENTORY>                                     27,143
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,782
<PP&E>                                         102,708
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,047
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,806
<BONDS>                                         85,000
<COMMON>                                           124
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   230,457
<SALES>                                        333,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               333,011
<CGS>                                          282,967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  282,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,209
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,295
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,021
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,163)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,318)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,318)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.17)


</TABLE>
### J-A21003-16
NON

### -PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE 

### SUPERIORCOURT

### I.O.P. 

### 65.37 ESTATE OF LYDIA F. SHEARLDS APPEAL OF: DEREE J. NORMAN IN THE SUPERIORCOURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 3061 EDA 2015 Appeal 

### fromthe Decree 

### September 11, 2015 In

### the Court ofCommon Pleas 

### of Delaware County Orphans' Courtat No(s): 384 OF

### 2015; File # 2315-0941
BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., DUBOW, J., and MUSMANNO, J. MEMORANDUM BY BENDER, P.J.E.: 

### FILED NOVEMBER

### 08,

### 2016 Deree J. Norman appeals 

### pro se 

### from the decree entered by 

### the 

### orphans' court on 

### September 11, 2015, 

### that denied his 

### petition seeking to compel Michelle Shearlds to 

### return personal 

### property, i.e.,

### the WestCatholic class 

### ring, which he claims was 

### taken 

### from the estate of Lydia F. Shearlds 

### without consentofthe Executrix, Maria Slocum. 

### After review, we

### affirm. 

### Initially, we note 

### that Mr. Norman's 

### brief contains a list of ten questions, but the 

### argument section of his 

### brief, which covers a 

### little over two pages, is not divided into separate sections as required by Pa.R.A.P. 

### 2119(a) (stating, 

### "[t]he argument shall be divided into as 

### many parts as 

### there are 

### questions to be 

### argued, and shall have atthe head 

### ofeach 

### part

... 

### the 

### particular pointtreatedtherein, followed by such discussion and 

### citation of 

### authorities as are deemed 

### pertinent"). Based upon 

### this error alone, 

### the 

### arguments Mr. Norman 

### attempts to 

### put 

### forth are 

### difficult to assess, 

### but we choose notto quash 

### theappeal 

### forthis reason.

### J-A21003-16
Rather, we review 

### this case in 

### relation to 

### the issues raised, but also conclude 

### that the orphans' court correctly determined 

### that Mr. Norman did not have standing to file the 

### petition to compel. Having examined the certified record, Mr. 

### Norman's 

### brief,' the applicable law, and 

### the 

### thorough opinion authored by 

### the Honorable Chad F. Kenny, President Judge 

### of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, dated February 2, 2016, we conclude 

### that Judge Kenny's 

### well-reasoned opinion 

### properly disposes 

### of the issues presented. Accordingly, we 

### adopt Judge Kenny's opinion as our own and 

### affirm the September 11, 2015 decree on

### that basis. Decree 

### affirmed. Judgment Entered.


## J:seph D. 

### Seletyn, Prothonotary
Date: 

### 11/8/2016



### ' No 

### otherbriefswere filed

### with thisCourt. 

## -2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6997

JOSEPH HATCHER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM YORK, M.D.,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department Corrections,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:22-cv-00047-CMH-IDD)

Submitted: April 25, 2023 Decided: April 27, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6997 Doc: 18 Filed: 04/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Joseph Hatcher, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Salvatore Cottone, BYRNE CANAAN LAW, 

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6997 Doc: 18 Filed: 04/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Hatcher appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Dr. 

William York in Hatcher’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to 

Hatcher’s serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and the magistrate 

judge’s order denying Hatcher’s motion to appoint counsel. On appeal, we confine our 

review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hatcher’s 

informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s summary judgment 

disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 

775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under 

Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). With respect 

to the magistrate judge’s denial of Hatcher’s motion to appoint counsel, we have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Hatcher v. Clarke, No. 

1:22-cv-00047-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Jan. 13, 2022; July 28, 2022). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6997 Doc: 18 Filed: 04/27/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Annual Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the Operating Partnership) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Terry L. Stevens, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Highwoods Properties Inc., general partner of the
Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ TERRY L. STEVENS                                             
|Terry L. Stevens                                                 
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
|March 15, 2007
EXHIBIT 23




NEFF & RICCI
----------------------
                 LLP




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


Board of Directors
GFSB Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
333-07131) on Form S-8 of GFSB Bancorp,  Inc. of our report dated July 30, 1999,
relating to the consolidated  statement of financial  condition of GFSB Bancorp,
Inc. as of June 30, 1999,  and the related  consolidated  statements of earnings
and comprehensive  earnings,  changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for
the years ending June 30, 1999 and 1998,  which  report  appears in the June 30,
1999 annual report on Form 10-KSB of GFSB Bancorp, Inc.





/s/ NEFF & RICCI LLP
-------------------------------------------------
September 24, 1999
Albuquerque, New Mexico









                   CONSULTANTS & CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                 7001 Prospect Lace, NE * Albuquerque, NM 87110
            (505) 883-6612 * Fax (505) 830-6282 * e-mail: neff@nm.net
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 10, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14725]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLWY920000. L51040000.FI0000. 18XL5017AR]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
WYW096788, Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As provided for under the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as 
amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for 
reinstatement of competitive oil and gas lease WYW096788 from Bearcat 
Energy LLC (Colorado), Elly B Beard 2007 Trust and Leeman Minerals LLC 
for land in Converse County, Wyoming. The lessees filed the petition on 
time, along with all rentals due since the lease terminated under the 
law. No leases affecting this land were issued before the petition was 
filed. The BLM proposes to reinstate the lease.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Hite, Branch Chief for Fluid 
Minerals Adjudication, Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming State Office, 
5353 Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming, 82003; phone 
307-775-6176; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5a6adacb1a085a7a9a8eba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e4878c8d9081a4868889ca838b92">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf may call 
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact Mr. Hite 
during normal business hours. The FRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 
days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. 
A reply will be sent during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessees agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre, or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16 \2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and the $159 cost of 
publishing this notice. The lessee met the requirements for 
reinstatement of the lease per Sec. 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). The BLM proposes to reinstate the 
lease effective July 1, 2015, under the amended terms and conditions of 
the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. 30 
U.S.C. 188 (e)(4) and 43 CFR 3108.2-3 (b)(2)(v)

Christopher Hite,
Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 2018-14725 Filed 7-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>