Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 130 / Friday, July 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules 31511 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA– 

2018–0581; Product Identifier 2018– 

NM–029–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by August 20, 

2018. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

Model 777–200, –200LR, –300, and –300ER 

series airplanes, certificated in any category, 

as identified in Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 777–25–0649, Revision 1, 

dated October 6, 2017. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 25, Equipment/furnishings. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by a report that 

showed a non-compliance exists on some inservice galley attendant seat fitting 

installations. The non-compliance could 

result in flight attendant seats failing in a 

high-G crash. We are issuing this AD to 

address non-compliant flight attendant seats, 

which could fail in a high-G crash and result 

in potential injury to flight attendants and 

consequent inability of the flight attendants 

to assist with passenger evacuation in a 

timely manner. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Required Actions 

Within 6 years after the effective date of 

this AD, do all applicable actions identified 

as ‘‘RC’’ (required for compliance) in, and in 

accordance with, the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 777–25–0649, Revision 1, 

dated October 6, 2017. 

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, 

FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs 

for this AD, if requested using the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 

14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your 

principal inspector or local Flight Standards 

District Office, as appropriate. If sending 

information directly to the manager of the 

certification office, send it to the attention of 

the person identified in paragraph (i)(1) of 

this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9- 

ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair, 

modification, or alteration required by this 

AD if it is approved by the Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO 

Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be 

approved, the repair method, modification 

deviation, or alteration deviation must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(4) For service information that contains 

steps that are labeled as RC, the provisions 

of paragraphs (h)(4)(i) and (h)(4)(ii) of this 

AD apply. 

(i) The steps labeled as RC, including 

substeps under an RC step and any figures 

identified in an RC step, must be done to 

comply with the AD. If a step or substep is 

labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC 

requirement is removed from that step or 

substep. An AMOC is required for any 

deviations to RC steps, including substeps 

and identified figures. 

(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be 

deviated from using accepted methods in 

accordance with the operator’s maintenance 

or inspection program without obtaining 

approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps, 

including substeps and identified figures, can 

still be done as specified, and the airplane 

can be put back in an airworthy condition. 

(i) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Allison Buss, Aerospace Engineer, 

Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems 

Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 

South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; 

phone and fax: 206–231–3564; email: 

Allison.buss@faa.gov. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data 

Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., 

MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600; 

telephone 562–797–1717; internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this 

referenced service information at the FAA, 

Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 

216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information 

on the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call 206–231–3195. 

Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on June 

21, 2018. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Director, System Oversight Division, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14425 Filed 7–5–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2018–0350; FRL–9979– 

54—Region 6] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Oklahoma; 

General SIP Updates 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean 

Air Act (CAA or the Act), the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

is proposing to approve revisions to the 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) for 

Oklahoma submitted by the State of 

Oklahoma designee with a letter dated 

February 14, 2017. The submittal covers 

updates to the Oklahoma SIP, as 

contained in annual SIP updates for 

2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, and 

incorporates the latest changes to EPA 

regulations. This action will address the 

revisions submitted to the Oklahoma 

SIP pertaining to incorporation by 

reference of federal requirements and 

emission inventory reporting 

requirements. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before August 6, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket No. EPA–R06– 

OAR–2018–0350, at http://

www.regulations.gov or via email to 

wiley.adina@epa.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from Regulations.gov. 

The EPA may publish any comment 

received to its public docket. Do not 

submit electronically any information 

you consider to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, please 

contact Adina Wiley, 214–665–2115, 

wiley.adina@epa.gov. For the full EPA 

public comment policy, information 

about CBI or multimedia submissions, 

and general guidance on making 

effective comments, please visit http:// 

www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets. 

Docket: The index to the docket for 

this action is available electronically at 

www.regulations.gov and in hard copy 

at the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the index, some information may be 

publicly available only at the hard copy 

location (e.g., copyrighted material), and 

some may not be publicly available at 

either location (e.g., CBI). 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
31512 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 130 / Friday, July 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Adina Wiley, (214) 665–2115, 

wiley.adina@epa.gov. To inspect the 

hard copy materials, please schedule an 

appointment with Ms. Adina Wiley or 

Mr. Bill Deese at (214) 665–7253. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

I. Background 

Section 110 of the Act requires states 

to develop air pollution regulations and 

control strategies to ensure that air 

quality meets the EPA’s National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards. These 

ambient standards are established under 

section 109 of the Act and they 

currently address six criteria pollutants: 

Carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, 

ozone, lead, particulate matter, and 

sulfur dioxide. The state’s air 

regulations are contained in its SIP, 

which is basically a clean air plan. Each 

state is responsible for developing SIPs 

to demonstrate how the NAAQS will be 

achieved, maintained, and enforced. 

The SIP must be submitted to EPA for 

approval and any changes a state makes 

to the approved SIP also must be 

submitted to the EPA for approval. 

The Oklahoma Secretary of Energy 

and Environment submitted revisions 

for approval by EPA on February 14, 

2017. The submittal addresses air 

pollution regulations and control 

strategies adopted and codified in the 

Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC) 

under Title 252 (DEQ), Chapter 100 (Air 

Pollution Control), Subchapter 2 and 

Appendix Q—Incorporation by 

Reference; Subchapter 5—Registration, 

Emission Inventory and Annual 

Operating Fees; Subchapter 13—Open 

Burning; Subchapter 17—Incinerators; 

Subchapter 25—Visible Emissions and 

Particulates; Subchapter 31—Control of 

Emission of Sulfur Compounds; 

Appendix E—Primary Ambient Air 

Quality Standards; and Appendix F— 

Secondary Ambient Air Quality 

Standards. The EPA has proposed 

separate action to address the February 

14, 2017, submission of revisions to 

OAC 252:100, Subchapters 13, 17, 25, 

31, and Appendices E and F. See the 

rulemaking docket EPA–R06–OAR– 

2017–0145. In this action we are only 

addressing the February 14, 2017, 

submitted revisions to OAC 252:100, 

Subchapters 2, 5, and Appendix Q. 

II. The EPA’s Evaluation 

The accompanying Technical Support 

Document for this action includes a 

detailed analysis of the submitted 

revisions to the Oklahoma SIP. With the 

exception of Subchapter 5 discussed 

below, the revisions are minor or nonsubstantive in nature and do not change 

the intent of the originally approved SIP 

requirements. Our analysis indicates 

that the SIP revision package submitted 

on February 14, 2017, has been 

developed in accordance with the CAA 

and the State provided reasonable 

notice and public hearing. The revisions 

to OAC 252:100, Subchapter 2 and 

Appendix Q update the incorporation 

by reference dates so that the Oklahoma 

SIP maintains consistency with federal 

requirements. The revisions to OAC 

252:100, Subchapter 5 substantively 

revise the emission inventory reporting 

requirements. The ODEQ is revising the 

reporting schedule for sources with 

permits by rule to align with the ThreeYear Cycle Inventory of the National 

Emission Inventory specified in 40 CFR 

51.30(b). ODEQ is clarifying that permit 

exempt and de minimis facilities as 

defined in OAC 252:100, Subchapter 7 

are not subject to emission inventory 

reporting requirements unless annual 

emissions from the facility exceed the 

federal emission thresholds listed in 40 

CFR part 51, Appendix A. The ODEQ is 

also providing the ability for the 

Director to require emission inventory 

reporting from any facility with the 

potential to emit any regulated air 

pollutant if the data is needed for 

program planning or compliance with 

State or Federal rules, regulations, 

standards or requirements. The EPA has 

determined it is appropriate to approve 

revisions to the Oklahoma SIP because 

these revisions maintain consistency 

with federal requirements and will not 

interfere with any applicable 

requirement concerning attainment and 

reasonable further progress or any other 

applicable CAA requirements. 

III. Proposed Action 

We are proposing to approve revisions 

to the Oklahoma SIP that revise the 

incorporation by reference dates for 

federal requirements and update the 

emission inventory reporting 

requirements. We have determined that 

the revisions submitted on February 14, 

2017, were developed in accordance 

with the CAA and EPA’s regulations. 

Therefore, under section 110 of the Act, 

the EPA proposes approval of the 

following revisions to the Oklahoma 

SIP: 

• Revisions to OAC 252:100–2–3 and 

Appendix Q adopted on April 25, 2013; 

effective July 1, 2013; 

• Revisions to OAC 252:100–2–3 and 

Appendix Q adopted on June 19, 2014; 

effective September 12, 2014; 

• Revisions to OAC 252:100–2–3 and 

Appendix Q adopted on June 8, 2015; 

effective September 15, 2015; 

• Revisions to OAC 252:100–2–3 and 

Appendix Q adopted on June 9, 2016; 

effective September 15, 2016; 

• Revisions to OAC 252:100–5–2 

adopted on June 19, 2014; effective 

September 12, 2014; 

• Revisions to OAC 252:100–5–2.1 

adopted on June 19, 2014; effective 

September 12, 2014; 

• Revisions to OAC 252:100–5–2.1 

adopted June 9, 2016; effective 

September 15, 2016; and 

• Revisions to OAC 252:100–5–3 

adopted on June 19, 2014; effective 

September 12, 2014. 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

In this action, we are proposing to 

include in a final rule regulatory text 

that includes incorporation by 

reference. In accordance with the 

requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, we are 

proposing to incorporate by reference 

revisions to the Oklahoma regulations as 

described in the Proposed Action 

section above. We have made, and will 

continue to make, these documents 

generally available electronically 

through www.regulations.gov and in 

hard copy at the EPA Region 6 office 

(please contact Adina Wiley for more 

information). 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely proposes to approve state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 

FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory 

action because SIP approvals are 

exempted under Executive Order 12866; 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 130 / Friday, July 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules 31513 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the proposed rule does 

not have tribal implications and will not 

impose substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

oxides, Volatile organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: June 28, 2018. 

Anne Idsal, 

Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14493 Filed 7–5–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0442; FRL–9980– 

11—Region 1] 

Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; 

Action on Single Source Orders and 

Revision to Definitions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revisions submitted by the State of New 

Hampshire. The revisions incorporate a 

single source order into the New 

Hampshire SIP, remove a previously 

approved order from the SIP, and 

approve various definitions used within 

New Hampshire’s air pollution control 

regulations. This action is being taken 

under the Clean Air Act. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before August 6, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01– 

OAR–2017–0442 at https://

www.regulations.gov, or via email to 

mcconnell.robert@epa.gov. For 

comments submitted at Regulations.gov, 

follow the online instructions for 

submitting comments. Once submitted, 

comments cannot be edited or removed 

from Regulations.gov. For either manner 

of submission, the EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, please 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

For the full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets. Publicly available docket 

materials are available at https://

www.regulations.gov or at the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 

New England Regional Office, Office of 

Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality 

Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square— 

Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA requests 

that if at all possible, you contact the 

contact listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob 

McConnell, Environmental Engineer, 

Air Quality Planning Unit, Air Programs 

Branch (Mail Code OEP05–02), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 1, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 

100, Boston, Massachusetts, 02109– 

3912; (617) 918–1046; 

mcconnell.robert@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Background and Purpose 

II. Description and Review of Submittals 

a. Order for the Diacom Corporation 

b. Withdrawal of Order for the Kalwall 

Corporation 

c. Revisions to Env-A 101, Definitions 

III. Proposed Action 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background and Purpose 

On July 24, 2017, the New Hampshire 

Air Resources Division (ARD) submitted 

a revision to its SIP consisting of an 

order establishing reasonably available 

control technology (RACT) requirements 

for the Diacom Corporation. On June 22, 

2017, the New Hampshire ARD 

submitted a SIP revision that requested 

removal from the SIP of a previously 

approved RACT order for the Kalwall 

Corporation. On November 14, 2003, the 

New Hampshire ARD submitted a 

number of SIP revision requests to EPA, 

including a request to revise its set of 

definitions used within its air pollution 

control regulations. We are proposing to 

approve these three SIP revision 

requests for the reasons stated below. 

II. Description and Review of 

Submittals 

a. Order for the Diacom Corporation 

On July 24, 2017, the New Hampshire 

ARD submitted to EPA as a SIP revision 

request order RO–0002 establishing 

RACT requirements to limit emissions 

of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) 

for the Diacom Corporation located in 

Amherst, New Hampshire. The Diacom 

Corporation requested a source-specific 

RACT order for VOCs for an adhesives 

process that requires use of a high 

solvent-based product necessary to 

obtain an extremely thin, monomolecular layer of adhesive onto fabrics 

used in the production of diaphragms 

for the aerospace, automotive, medical, 

and food processing industries. 

Diacom’s request included a technical 

justification and an evaluation of 

capture and control device technologies 

that were evaluated. No cost effective 

capture and control technologies were 

uncovered from the evaluation. New 

Hampshire reviewed and concurred 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS