alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Matter of J. S.

Appellate case number: 01-10-00646-CV

Trial court case number: 1000824J

Trial court: 313th District Court of Harris County

This is an appeal from a proceeding under the Texas Juvenile Justice Act, in which the 

juvenile, J.S., was adjudicated delinquent. Appellant, J.S.’s mother, filed a pro se notice of 

appeal under her own signature. On September 20, 2011, this Court issued an order abating this 

appeal and directing the trial court to conduct a hearing and make appropriate findings on 

whether J.S. retained his right to appeal and wished to prosecute the appeal. A reporter’s record 

of the hearing was ordered to be filed within 20 days of our order. A clerk’s record of all 

documents filed in the trial court, including the findings and recommendations requested in our 

September 20, 2011 order, was ordered to be filed within 30 days of our order. Although a 

clerk’s record was filed on October 18, 2011, it did not include the findings and 

recommendations requested in our order. The reporter’s record has not been filed.

Accordingly, the appeal remains abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this 

Court’s active docket. We order the trial court to conduct a hearing within 15 days of this order 

to determine (1) whether J.S. retained his right to appeal and (2) whether both appellant and J.S. 

wish to prosecute this appeal. If the trial court finds that J.S. did not waive his right to appeal and 

that both appellant and J.S. wish to pursue this appeal, the trial court is ordered to appoint 

appellate counsel for J.S.

The trial court shall have a court reporter record the hearing. The court reporter is 

ordered, at no cost to appellants, to file a reporter’s record of the hearing within 30 days of this 

order. We further order the district clerk, at no cost to appellants, to file, within 30 days of this 

order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing all documents filed in the trial court, including 

the findings and recommendations ordered herein.

This appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the reporter’s record 

and the supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings and recommendations

ordered herein are filed in this Court. The Court will consider an appropriate motion to reinstate 

the appeal filed by any party.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 8, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                5
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000

<S>
                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     APR-28-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                          JUL-29-2000
<CASH>                                                      6,185
<SECURITIES>                                                8,272
<RECEIVABLES>                                               3,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  262
<INVENTORY>                                                11,190
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           29,342
<PP&E>                                                     17,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                              4,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             96,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       6,420
<BONDS>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                      858
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 81,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               96,100
<SALES>                                                    11,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           11,074
<CGS>                                                      10,665
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              10,665
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            1,404
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (705)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 (176)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (529)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                520
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (9)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (.01)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 6, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60778 Summary Calendar

MAHMOOD SHAHID, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A72 054 470

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Mahmood Shahid petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). This court lacks jurisdiction to consider the denial of Shahid’s application for asylum because the BIA denied the application as untimely. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3). Regarding the withholding of removal, Shahid conclusionally argues that he has a reasonable fear of future persecution, butNo. 04-60778 -2- he does not specify on what statutorily protected ground he would be persecuted, nor does challenge the Immigration Judge’s finding that he holds no political opinion and is not a member of any particular social group. He has thus abandoned any challenge to those findings. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). His claim for withholding of removal fails because, even if it is assumed that the evidence established a likelihood of future persecution, such persecution must be based on one of the enumerated grounds. See Efe v. Ashcroft , 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir. 2002) ; 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(b)(1). His claim for relief under the CAT similarly fails because there is no evidence that he would be subjected to any government-sponsored torture if returned to Pakistan. See Bah v. Ashcroft , 341 F.3d 348, 352 (5th Cir. 2003); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.18(a)(1). The petition for review is DENIED.
Exhibit 32

                            SFG FINANCIAL CORPORATION


            Certification of Procedures Followed in Connection with
                        Sarbanes-Oxley Act Certification

The undersigned, Chairman of SFG Financial Corporation, a Delaware Corporation (
the "Company") hereby certifies, for purposes of documenting the steps followed
by the officer in connection with the execution and delivery to the Securities
and Exchange Commission of the attached certification as follows:

(1)    I reviewed in detail the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period
       ending January 31,2004, (the "Report") shortly before the certification
       was provided.

(2)    I discussed the substance of the Report with each of the Company's
       outside auditors. These discussions took place at various times and
       covered principally the financial statement portions of the reports
       (including the notes which are an integral part of the financial
       statements) and related financial disclosures. These discussions included
       my verifying that the financial statements in the report are accurate and
       complete, and are properly prepared and consolidated. I confirm that the
       outside auditors were satisfied that the notes to the financial
       statements read clearly and that the notes fairly explain the company's
       significant accounting principles and significant estimates, as well as
       disclose all material contingencies and "off balance sheet" transactions
       and commitments known to them. In addition, my discussions with outside
       auditors included a discussion of any material issues that came up in
       their review of the financial statements and the resolution of those
       issues .I also verified with the outside auditors that internal controls
       are in place and operating to warrant reliance upon the financial and
       business information provided by management.

(3)    I confirmed that the consolidated financial statements included in the
       Report are accurate and complete in all material respects, reflect all
       transactions of the Company during and for the statement period following
       accounting principles consistent with those applied in prior periods, and
       that all period end adjustments have been made in a manner consistent
       with the accounting principles in prior periods (other than usual and
       customary year end adjustments in the case of interim statements).

(4)    As a result of the foregoing procedures, I concluded that, to the best of
       my knowledge, I was able to provide the certification without exception.


       In witness whereof, I have executed this certification as of the 28th day
of October 2005.

       /s/ John A. Dugan
       -----------------
 Name: John A. Dugan
       Chairman
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Roy Deloatch, Respondent.

[655 NYS2d 932]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence Tonetti, J.), entered on or about April 15, 1996, which granted defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence, unanimously affirmed.

The hearing court’s conclusion that the police lacked probable cause to arrest defendant was based on its rejection of the testimony of the People’s witness, and we see no reason to disturb that credibility determination. Defendant’s failure to establish a privacy interest in the automobile from which the contraband was recovered is irrelevant, since there was no probable cause in the first instance to take from defendant’s person the keys that provided access to that vehicle *(see, Wong Sun v United States,*371 US 471; *People v Parris,*136 AD2d 882, *Iv dismissed*71 NY2d 1031). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Tom and Andrias, JJ.
#### Harold Jackson LOWRY, Jr., Appellant, v. Lila Ann DUNN, a minor, by her father and next friend, Ted Dunn and Ted Dunn, Individually, Appellees.

No. 70-656.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 4 0 0 9 4 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. G E R O N I M O S A L V A D O R S A N T O S

- N U E Z , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 1 : 0 9

- C R

- 1 0 0 5

- 1

B e f o r e S M I T H , D E N N I S , a n d C L E M E N T , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e a t t o r n e y a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t G e r o n i m o S a l v a d o r S a n t o s - N u e z h a s

m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. S a n t o s - N u e z h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 26 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40094 Document: 00511274820 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010
## Cover Letter

{XXX}

Page 1 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### 74827928249 SPEC150629817354109 DO504W

X X

X Page 2 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### X



## X Page 3 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX

XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 

## X

X
X X

X X Page 4 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 5 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 6 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X NMR 8500 0 0 Analytical Public.pdf


### XXX XXX X 36.8 0 

### XXX XXX X 23.2 0 

### XXX XXX X 23.2 0 

### XXX XXX X 16.8 0
Page 7 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X 390950 IES Public.pdf 

## X XXX
XXX See Attachment 003 (Structure Public.pdf)

Structure Public.pdf Page 8 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX

Diphenylmethane diisocyanate prepolymer 

## X

Page 9 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### XXX XXX 

## X

X Raw material for flexible foam XXX 

### X 100 18 0 0 100 0

Page 10 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONNone - substance is shipped directly to the customer.

Page 11 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 12 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 13 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 14 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### XXX 

## X

See Attachment 005 (Use Public v2.pdf)

Use Public v2.pdf Page 15 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONP10SB1(a)(4)1 Part II, Section B, 1(a)(4). Operation Site Locations

XXX

Page 16 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONA 4 8 15 Body-covering clothing, gloves, safety goggles, general and/or local ventilation 18 18 B 4 8 15 Body-covering clothing, gloves, safety goggles, general and/or local ventilation 18 9

1 0.001 Landfill (cured foam with trace residual PMN substance)

Page 17 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 18 SANITIZED SUBMISSION001 MW and Spectrum Public Analytical Public.pdf Pt.I, Sec.B, 2a. 3 002 IES Public IES Public.pdf Pt.I, Sec.B, 2c. 1 003 Structure Public Structure Public.pdf Pt.I, Sec.B, 2e. 1 004 SDS Public SDS Public pdf.pdf 13 005 Use Public Use Public v2.pdf Pt.2, Sec.B, 1a. 2

Page 19 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 20 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 001 Attachment Name MW and Spectrum Public 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 2a. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number SPEC150629817354109

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 002 Attachment Name IES Public 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 2c. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number SPEC150629817354109

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 003 Attachment Name Structure Public 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 2e. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number SPEC150629817354109

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 004 Attachment Name SDS Public 

## Associated PMN Section Number

N/A Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number SPEC150629817354109

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 005 Attachment Name Use Public 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.2, Sec.B, 1a. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number SPEC150629817354109
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-078-020-6-454-CV

IN RE THE STATE OF TEXAS	RELATORLENNAR CORPORATION,	RELATORS

BARBARA WELKE, JACK DAWSON, 

DOUG MURPHY, AND DONNY HENDRIX	

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s’ petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator’s’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

	Relators shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL A:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, WALKER and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED:  January 23, 2007December 21, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Golden  Enterprises,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the third quarter ended March 2, 2007, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Mark W. McCutcheon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: April 11, 2007



/s/ Mark W. McCutcheon
----------------------
Mark W. McCutcheon
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon
request.


                                       23
# Official Journal C 39A/5 Fe

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 39A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 585 February 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 39A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 585 February 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2015/C 039A/01 | Reserve list — Open competition — EPSO/AD/273/13 — Lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — English-language (EN) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2015/C 039A/01

Reserve list — Open competition — EPSO/AD/273/13 — Lawyer-linguists (AD 7) — English-language (EN)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,338,391
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,746
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,379,137
<PP&E>                                      97,451,109
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,594,902
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              88,153,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,304,181
<BONDS>                                     42,057,088
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  41,247,678
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                88,153,571
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,537,296
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,286,522
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,003,726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,025,396
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,025,396
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,025,396
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   116.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   116.78
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Paul CASTILLO, Petitioner, v. Honorable Alfonso C. SEPE, As Judge, etc., Respondent.

No. 42394.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 6, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 261 So.2d 582.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 586 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 586

  Expressing their profound thanks and appreciation to the Honorable 
Thomas S. Foley, Speaker of the House of Representatives, for the very 
     fair and impartial manner with which he has presided over our 
deliberations and performed the arduous duties of the chair during his 
                           tenure as Speaker.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 1994

Mr. Michel submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing their profound thanks and appreciation to the Honorable 
Thomas S. Foley, Speaker of the House of Representatives, for the very 
     fair and impartial manner with which he has presided over our 
deliberations and performed the arduous duties of the chair during his 
                           tenure as Speaker.

    Resolved, That Members of the House express their profound thanks 
and appreciation to the Honorable Thomas S. Foley, Speaker of the House 
of Representatives for the very fair and impartial manner with which he 
has presided over our deliberations and performed the arduous duties of 
the chair during his tenure as Speaker.
                                 <all>
```
#### Russell H. KEUSCH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-680.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 7, 1972.

Rehearing Denied May 17, 1972.

Gerald Kogan, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted by verdict of a jury of buying, receiving or aiding in the concealment of stolen property (34,000 pounds of beef). Upon consideration of the contentions presented on appeal by the defendant, in the light of the record, briefs and arguments, we find no reversible error has been shown. The refusal to suppress evidence obtained upon the search was proper, based on evidence submitted at the hearing thereon. Carter *205v. State, Fla.App.1967, 199 So.2d 324, 334; Brown v. State, Fla.App.1970, 230 So.2d 177. Appellant’s contention of insufficiency of the evidence is found to be without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.