32262 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 134 / Thursday, July 12, 2018 / Notices 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 81 FR 86694 

(December 1, 2016). 

2See Letter from Verso, ‘‘Supercalendered Paper 

from Canada: Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

January 3, 2017; see Letter from Catalyst, 

‘‘Supercalendered Paper from Canada: Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ December 9, 2016; see 

Letter from Irving, ‘‘Supercalendered Paper from 

Canada, Inv. No. C–122–854—Request for 

Administrative Review and Request for Expansion 

of Review Period,’’ December 23, 2016; see Letter 

from PHP, ‘‘Supercalendered Paper from Canada: 

Request for Administrative Review,’’ December 9, 

2016; see Letter from Resolute, ‘‘Supercalendered 

Paper from Canada: Request for Administrative 

Review (8/3/15–12/31/15),’’ December 19, 2016. 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 

10457 (February 13, 2017). 

4See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 83 FR 57219 

(December 4, 2017). 

5See Letter from Verso, ‘‘Supercalendered Paper 

from Canada: Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

December 29, 2017; see Letter from Irving, 

‘‘Supercalendered Paper from Canada, Inv. No. 

C–122–854—Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

December 15, 2017; see Letter from PHP, 

‘‘Supercalendered Paper from Canada: Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ December 20, 2017; see 

Letter from Resolute, ‘‘Supercalendered Paper from 

Canada: Request for Administrative Review 

(1/1/2016–12/31/2016),’’ December 21, 2017. 

6See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 

8058 (February 23, 2018). 

7See Supercalendered Paper from Canada: Final 

Results of Changed Circumstances Review and 

Revocation of Countervailing Duty Order, signed 

July 5, 2018. 

A business analysis of the proposed 

new fee site has shown that people 

desire having a variety of recreation 

opportunities and experiences on the 

Flathead National Forest, such as lakeorientated developed campgrounds. A 

market analysis of surrounding 

recreation sites with similar amenities 

indicates that the proposed fee is 

comparable and reasonable. 

Dated: July 5, 2018. 

Glenn Casamassa, 

Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest 

System. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14911 Filed 7–11–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–18–2018] 

Production Activity Not Authorized; 

Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 26—Atlanta, 

Georgia; PBR, Inc. d/b/a SKAPS 

Industries (Non-Woven Geotextiles); 

Athens, Georgia 

On March 9, 2018, PBR, Inc. d/b/a 

SKAPS Industries (SKAPS) submitted a 

notification of proposed production 

activity to the FTZ Board for its facility 

within FTZ 26—Site 29, in Athens, 

Georgia. 

The notification was processed in 

accordance with the regulations of the 

FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including 

notice in the Federal Register inviting 

public comment (83 FR 13473, March 

29, 2018). On July 9, 2018 the applicant 

was notified of the FTZ Board’s decision 

that further review of the activity is 

warranted. The production activity 

described in the notification was not 

authorized. If the applicant wishes to 

seek authorization for this activity, it 

will need to submit an application for 

production authority, pursuant to 

Section 400.23. 

Dated: July 9, 2018. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14928 Filed 7–11–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–122–854] 

Supercalendered Paper From Canada: 

Notice of Rescission of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review; 2015 and 

2016 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is rescinding the 

administrative reviews of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

supercalendared paper (SC paper) from 

Canada for the period of review August 

3, 2015, through December 31, 2015, 

and the period of review January 1, 

2016, through December 31, 2016. 

DATES: Applicable July 12, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emily Halle or Nicholas Czajkowski, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office I, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–0176 or 

(202) 482–1395, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 1, 2016, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the CVD order 

on SC paper from Canada for the period 

of review (POR) of August 3, 2015, 

through December 31, 2015.1 Commerce 

received timely-filed requests from 

Verso Corporation (Verso); Catalyst 

Paper Corporation, Catalyst Pulp and 

Paper Sales Inc., and Catalyst Paper 

(USA) Inc. (collectively, Catalyst); Irving 

Paper Limited (Irving); Port Hawkesbury 

Paper LP (PHP); and Resolute FP 

Canada Inc and Resolute FP US Inc. 

(collectively, Resolute), in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), to conduct 

an administrative review of the CVD 

order.2 Based upon this request, on 

February 13, 2017, in accordance with 

section 751(a) of the Act, Commerce 

published a notice of initiation.3

On December 4, 2017, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the CVD order 

on SC paper from Canada for the period 

of review (POR) of January 1, 2016, 

through December 31, 2016.4 Commerce 

received timely-filed requests from 

Verso Corporation, Irving Paper 

Limited, Port Hawkesbury Paper LP, 

and Resolute FP Canada Inc and 

Resolute FP US Inc., in accordance with 

section 751(a) of the Act, to conduct an 

administrative review of the CVD 

order.5 Based upon this request, on 

February 23, 2018, in accordance with 

section 751(a) of the Act, Commerce 

published a notice of initiation.6

On July 5, 2018, Commerce revoked 

the CVD order on SC paper.7

Rescission of Administrative Reviews 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.222(g), 

Commerce revoked the CVD order on SC 

paper from Canada. The effective date of 

the revocation of the CVD order is 

August 3, 2015. As a result of the 

revocation, we instructed U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to 

discontinue the suspension of 

liquidation and the collection of cash 

deposits of estimated countervailing 

duties, to liquidate all unliquidated 

entries that were entered on or after 

August 3, 2015, without regard to 

countervailing duties, and to refund all 

CVD cash deposits on all such 

merchandise, with applicable interest. 

These administrative reviews cover the 

period August 3, 2015 through 

December 31, 2015, and the period 

January 1, 2016 through December 31, 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 134 / Thursday, July 12, 2018 / Notices 32263 

1For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum 

for the Preliminary Results of the 2016–2017 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished, from the People’s 

Republic of China’’ (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum), issued concurrently with and 

hereby adopted by this notice. 

2These companies are: (1) Apex Maritime 

Shanghai Co., Ltd.; (2) Crossroads Global Trading 

Co., Ltd.; (3) Honour Lane Shipping Ltd.; (4) 

Kinetsu World Express China Co., Ltd.; (5) Luoyang; 

(6) Pacific Link Intl Freight Forwarding Co., Ltd.; (7) 

Shanghai Dizhao Industrial Trading Co., Ltd.; (8) 

Thi Group Shanghai Ltd.; (9) Weifang HaoxinConmet Mechanical Products Co., Ltd.; (10) Yantai 

Huilong Machinery Parts Co.; Ltd.; (11) Zhejiang 

Machinery Import & Export Corp.; and (12) Zhejiang 

Zhaofeng Mechanical & Electronic Co., Ltd. 

3See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 8. 

Pursuant to Commerce’s change in practice, 

Commerce no longer considers the NME entity as 

an exporter conditionally subject to administrative 

reviews. See Antidumping Proceedings: 

Announcement of Change in Department Practice 

for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings and Conditional Review of the 

Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping 

Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65970 (November 

4, 2013). Under this practice, the NME entity will 

not be under review unless a party specifically 

requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a review of the 

entity. Because no party requested a review of the 

entity, the entity is not under review and the 

entity’s rate is not subject to change. 

2016. Because the revocation is 

retroactive to August 3, 2015, the 

periods covered by these ongoing 

administrative reviews are no longer 

subject to the CVD order, and there is no 

basis for conducting the administrative 

review. Therefore, Commerce is 

rescinding these administrative reviews. 

Assessment 

Because we ordered the liquidation of 

the entries subject to these 

administrative reviews, as a result of the 

revocation of the CVD order, there is no 

need to issue additional instructions to 

CBP. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with section 751 of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: July 5, 2018. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14922 Filed 7–11–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–601] 

Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts 

Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results and Intent To 

Rescind the Review in Part; 2016–2017 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is conducting an 

administrative review (AR) of the 

antidumping duty order on tapered 

roller bearings and parts thereof, 

finished and unfinished (TRBs), from 

the People’s Republic of China (China). 

The AR covers 20 exporters, of which 

Commerce selected two exporters for 

individual examination (i.e., GGB 

Bearing Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. 

(GGB); and Luoyang Bearing 

Corporation (Group) (Luoyang)). The 

period of review (POR) is June 1, 2016, 

through May 31, 2017. We preliminarily 

determine that sales of subject 

merchandise have been made below 

normal value (NV). Interested parties are 

invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable July 12, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Medley, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4987. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

includes tapered roller bearings and 

parts thereof. The subject merchandise 

is currently classifiable under 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 

8482.20.00, 8482.91.00.50, 8482.99.15, 

8482.99.45, 8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 

8483.30.80, 8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 

8483.90.80, 8708.70.6060, 8708.99.2300, 

8708.99.4850, 8708.99.6890, 

8708.99.8115, and 8708.99.8180. The 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes 

only; the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive.1

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Act. For GGB, we calculated 

export prices in accordance with section 

772 of the Act. Because China is a nonmarket economy (NME) within the 

meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, 

for GGB, NV was calculated in 

accordance with section 773(c) of the 

Act. We preliminary find that Luoyang 

is ineligible for a separate rate and is 

part of the China-wide entity. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov, and to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

room B8024 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be found at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The 

signed Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

A list of the topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

attached as the Appendix to this notice. 

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

Which Are Eligible for a Separate Rate 

As indicated in the ‘‘Preliminary 

Results of Review’’ section below, we 

preliminarily determine that a 

weighted-average dumping margin of 

6.87 percent applies to the six firms not 

selected for individual review which are 

eligible for a separate rate. For further 

information, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum at ‘‘Separate 

Rate Assigned to Non-Selected 

Companies.’’ 

Preliminary Results of Review 

Twelve companies involved in the 

administrative review did not 

demonstrate that they are entitled to a 

separate rate.2 Therefore, we 

preliminarily finds these companies to 

be part of the China-wide entity.3 The 

rate previously established for the 

China-wide entity is 92.84 percent. One 

additional company, Hangzhou 

Xiaoshan Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. 

(Dingli), could not demonstrate that it 

had a suspended entry during the POR; 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1