alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022073EN.01000901.xml

| 14.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) lodged on 29 October 2021 — VZW Belgische Vereniging van de Industrie van Plantenbeschermingsmiddelen (PHYTOFAR) v Vlaams Gewest

(Case C-658/21)

(2022/C 73/12)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VZW Belgische Vereniging van de Industrie van Plantenbeschermingsmiddelen (PHYTOFAR)

Defendant: Vlaams Gewest

Question referred

Must Article 5(1) of Directive 2015/1535/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015‘laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services’ be interpreted as meaning that a prohibition on the use of pesticides containing glyphosate on land in private use by users who do not have a phytosanitary licence is deemed to concern a technical regulation which must be communicated to the European Commission in accordance with the provisions of that article?

---

(1)  OJ 2015 L 241, p. 1.

---
#### HANNAH BENJAMIN, Executrix of WILLIAM BENJAMIN, deceased, *vs.*ANDREW BOYCE.

Plaintiff having declared in the name of H. R, executrix of *William*E. instead of *Wolf*B., was permitted to amend after issue joined.

Nark, in assumpsit. Application to amend the pleadings.

The plaintiff sued and declared in the above name; defendant appeared and pleaded to the suit. Issue was joined, and the case set down for trial.

*317*Macbeth*

now moved to amend the narr. by substituting *Wolf*Benjamin for *William*Benjamin, and thus make the suit stand Hannah Benjamin, executrix of Wolf Benjamin *vs.*Andrew Boyce.

The amendment was resisted. It was said by Mr. Bayard, as *amicus curies,*that chief justice *Taney,*in the last circuit court for the Delaware district, had decided that this was not a cause of non-suit, but the objection could only be taken on a plea in abatement. The case he referred to was *SheireU Sy Shewed*vs. *McCabe.*See *Saund. PI. ¿y Ev.*Abatement, *Misnomer; 2 Brod. Sy Bingh.*34; 6 *Serj. ¿y Lowb.*9 ; 10 *Mass. Rep.*252 ; 1 *Chitty Plead.*440.

*Macbeth,*for plaintiff.

*Hamilton,*for defendant.

*The Court.*

— It was once doubted if a mistake of the *plaintiff’s*Christian or surname were not ground of nonsuit, but it is now settled that the mistake must be pleaded in abatement, even in the case of a corporation.

But this is not the case of a misnomer of plaintiff’s Christian or surname, but a misdescription of the character in which she sues, to wit, as administratrix of William, instead of Wolf, Benjamin. Then does the principle cover this.

The defendant has given special bail. What would be the effect of the amendment as to the bail? Undoubtedly a discharge. And on what principle ? That the parties in the action are changed — > that it is now another suit. And if so, is the defendant bound to answer on his present appearance to this new suit? We will think of it.

*The Court*afterwards (chief justice hesitante) permitted the amendment, and the cause was continued. See act Jeofails, 8 *Del. Laws,*44. *(a)*

(a)

 Collins et al. vs. Townsend. Com. Pleas, Sussex, April Term, 1797. in this case the court, on motion of *Miller*for the plaintiffs, permitted the writ and declaration to be amended by striking out the names of two of the plaintiffs, on payment of the costs of the term. Chief Justice, J. M. Clayton’s MS. notes, p. 19.
#### In the Matter of Dwayne J. Holley, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[735 NYS2d 832]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

*770Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the unauthorized use of controlled substances after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. Substantial evidence was presented at the hearing supporting the determination of petitioner’s guilt, including the misbehavior report, the hearing testimony of the reporting officer, and the positive laboratory test results *(see, Matter of Garcia v Goord,*273 AD2d 560, 561; *Matter of Selby v Coombe,*249 AD2d 597). Petitioner’s contention that there was insufficient evidence of an unbroken chain of custody of his urine sample is refuted by the record which shows that the sample never left the custody of the reporting officer who collected, stored and tested it *(see,*7 NYCRR 1020.4 [e]; *see also, Matter of Symmonds v Goord,*244 AD2d 737). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been examined and determined to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 900 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 900

 To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the appointment 
       of an additional district judge for the District of Idaho.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 1993

 Mr. LaRocco introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the appointment 
       of an additional district judge for the District of Idaho.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the item relating 
to Idaho in the table contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``2'' and inserting ``3''.

                                 <all>
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-1388

_____________________________

VICTOR VAUGHAN REED,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Jeb T. Branham, Judge.

September 15, 2021

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, JAY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

 

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Victor Vaughan Reed, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<PAGE>

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT. THE
CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND ARE DENOTED BY [*]. THE
CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

                                O-I CONFIDENTIAL

                          OWENS-ILLINOIS CLOSURE, INC.
                                        &
                              USA DETERGENTS, INC.

                        TRIGGER SPRAYER SUPPLY AGREEMENT

        This SUPPLY AGREEMENT dated May 29, 1997, is made and entered into by
and between USA Detergents, Inc. and Owens-Illinois Closure Inc.
("Owens-Brockway") with a mailing address of One SeaGate, 29 LDP, Toledo, Ohio
43666, Attention David Andrulonis.

STANDARD 0188 TRIGGER SPRAYER

Includes polyethylene nozzle cup, 302ss Spring and Ball, foamed polyethylene
liner, spray/stream/off nozzle, and 28/400 closure. Components in standard USA
Detergents, Inc. color combinations.

QUANTITIES

[*] Supply Agreement [*].

TERM OF AGREEMENT

The term of this Supply Agreement shall be from July 1, 1997 through January 31,
2001.

[*]

RESIN PRICE ADJUSTMENT

[*].

CONSIDERATION

In Consideration for [*] Supply Agreement, Owens-Illinois Inc. will provide [*]
for all USA Detergents [*] purchases. This price reduction will take effect once
[*] shipments begin [*] and continue until the end of this agreement while all
conditions are met.

OPTIONS

Features and upgrades will be quoted separately and added to the above base
prices as appropriate.

TERMS

[*].
Freight - Delivered to North Brunswick, N.J.  08902-1469.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                           <C>
                  USA DETERGENTS INC.                                  OWENS-ILLINOIS CLOSURE INC.

BY:      /S/  DAN PARKER                                      BY:      /S/  DAVID L. ANDRULONIS
         -----------------------------------                           -----------------------------------
TITLE:   VP - MATERIALS MANAGEMENT                                     TITLE:   VP  BUSINESS UNIT MANAGER
         -----------------------------------                           -----------------------------------
DATE:    JULY 22, 1997                                        DATE:    JULY 23, 1997
         -----------------------------------                           -----------------------------------
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, each of the undersigned officers of GlycoGenesys, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



|(1) | the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Report.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:
May 17, 2004

|       |  |                      |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|------ |  | -------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  |                      |  | 
|By:    |  | /s/    John W. Burns |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/    Bradley J Carver
|       |  |                      |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|Name:  |  | John W. Burns        |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Bradley J Carver       
|Title: |  | SVP, CFO Secretary   |  |  |  | Title: |  | CEO President
#### Lester J. CHASE, Appellant, v. Joan T. CHASE, Appellee.

No. 67-490.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 19, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.
H. Res. 388

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

March 23, 1994.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 3345) to amend title 5, United States Code,

to eliminate certain restrictions on employee training; to provide temporary authority to agencies relating to voluntary

separation incentive payments; and for other purposes. All

points of order against the conference report and against its

consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
Order entered February 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01401-CR

ELIZABETH CLEMONS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-73435-Y

ORDER

We GRANT Official Court Reporter Sharon Hazlewood’s February 10, 2013 request for 

an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be due THIRTY 

DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
# C_2021128EN.01001502.xml

| 12.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) lodged on 22 January 2021 — Sense Visuele Communicatie en Handel vof (also trading under the name De Scharrelderij) v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit

(Case C-36/21)

(2021/C 128/22)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Sense Visuele Communicatie en Handel vof (also trading under the name De Scharrelderij)

Defendant: Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit

Question referred

Does EU law preclude an assessment on the basis of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations under national law of whether a national administrative body has created expectations contrary to a provision of EU law and has thus acted unlawfully under national law in failing to compensate the injured party for the damage suffered as a result, where the injured party cannot successfully invoke the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations under EU law because it involves an unambiguous provision of EU law?

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL18-178-000]

                    On June 29, 2018, the Commission instituted a proceeding in Docket No. EL18-178-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), to determine the just and reasonable replacement rate, based on its finding that PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.'s currently effective Open Access Transmission Tariff is unjust, unreasonable, and unduly discriminatory or preferential.                     *Calpine Corporation*                     v.                     *PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.,*                     163 FERC ¶ 61,236 (2018).                

                    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL18-178-000, established pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL18-178-000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21 days of the date of issuance of the order.

Dated: July 2, 2018.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-14772 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ROBERT DILUZIO,

Petitioner

v.

JOHN WETZEL, SECRETARY OF THE 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; 

BERNADETTE MASON, FACILITY 

MANAGER OF SCI MAHANOY; L. 

KRASNER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF 

PHILADELPHIA, PHILA. COUNTY 

COMMON PLEAS JUDGEMENT OF 

SENTENCE AT: CP-51-CR-0008130-2015,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 29 EM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2020, the “Emergency Motion Seeking Release 

from Respondent[’]s Custody” is DENIED.
#### Hubert Lee SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-895.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 8, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2021320EN.01001201.xml

| 9.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/12

---

Appeal brought on 25 March 2021 by Turk Hava Yollari AO against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 27 January 2021 in Case T-382/19, Turk Hava Yollari v EUIPO — Sky (skylife)

(Case C-185/21 P)

(2021/C 320/14)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Turk Hava Yollari AO (represented by: R. Almaraz Palmero, abogada)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Sky Ltd

By order of 29 June 2021, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Turk Hava Yollari AO should bear its own costs.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 200218 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Goldfield Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Stephen R. Wherry, Vice President, Treasurer and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Goldfield Corporation and will beretained by The Goldfield Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: August 13, 2003

/s/ Stephen R. WherryStephen R. Wherry Vice President, Treasurer and   Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, July 11, 2018, 01:00 p.m. to July 11, 2018, 04:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6710 B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 12, 2018, 83 248540 27338.                

The meeting date has changed from July 11, 2018, 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. to August 14, 2018, 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: June 29, 2018.

Michelle D. Trout,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-14454 Filed 7-5-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Gerald PERRY v. Hon. Matthew BRANIFF, Judge.

No. 61989.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 5, 1978.

In re: Gerald Perry applying for supervisory and remedial writs. Parish of Orleans.

Denied; appeal pending (C.Cr.P. 363) appeal has been lodged — # 62,109.
<PAGE>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                     EXHIBIT 3.2



         CANADA                                                 NUMBER
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
                                                                330743


                                        [SEAL]


                             Province of British Columbia
                     Ministry of Finance and Corporate Relations
                                REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES


                                     COMPANY ACT


                             CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION



                                I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT

                            No. 96 SAIL VIEW VENTURES LTD.



                 HAS THIS DAY BEEN INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANY ACT






                             GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE

                                  AT VICTORIA, BRITISH COLUMBIA,


                                  THIS 23RD DAY OF JULY, 1987.

                                  /s/ Roberta J. London

                                  ROBERTA J. LONDON
                                  DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Jeanette JOHNSON, wife of/and Warren Johnson v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, INC., and John B. Owen (Consolidated with Johnnie JOHNSON v. John B. OWEN and New Orleans Public Service, Inc., and Rebecca Davis, widow of Frank Schief, Jr., etc., et al.

No. 62554.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 15, 1978.

In re: Jeanette Johnson, wife of/and Warren Johnson, applying for certiorari, or *785writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 359 So.2d 272.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.