alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Golden Triangle Industries, Inc. for the period
ended March 31, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000042284
<NAME> GOLDEN TRIANGLE INDUSTRIES, INC.
       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          218124
<SECURITIES>                                     51363
<RECEIVABLES>                                   969798
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1229285
<PP&E>                                         7045395
<DEPRECIATION>                               (1420488)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6771048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           308611
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      20017
<COMMON>                                          1966
<OTHER-SE>                                     6233889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6771048
<SALES>                                         762898
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                762913
<CGS>                                           159787
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   159787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                300500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                320,306
<INCOME-TAX>                                    167627
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             152679
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    152679
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 200218 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Goldfield Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, John H. Sottile,Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Goldfield Corporation and will beretained by The Goldfield Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: August 13, 2003

/s/  John H. SottileJohn H. Sottile Chairman of the Board of Directors,    President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GeneLink, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John R. DePhillipo, as
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods shown in such report.


Date: March 28, 2003           By:         /s/ John R. DePhillipo
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                      John R. DePhillipo, Chief Executive
                                        Officer and Chief Financial Officer
ft 3
● ● ● ●●● ●●● ● ● ● Note: No traverse point shall be within 1.0" of the stack walls (see Sections 11.3.1) Typical vertical exhaust stack Equivalent downstream diameter (B): All points at least 1.0" from stack wall: A B Stack diameter: Upstream diameter (A):

16 12 8

Duct diameters upstream from flow disturbance or stack exit (Distance A) 0.50 0.75 1.00 20 24 Total points: Points per port: 1 2 4.4 14.6 15.7 3 4
N/A N/A N/A

5 6 flowInlet Inside wall Distance (in) 12 7.664 15.708Total minimum number of traverse points 2.50 2.25 0.25 0.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00

12 4 6 1 Duct diameters downstream from flow disturbance (Distance B) 5 4 3 0 8 Diameters 12" to 24" 24 20 16 Diameters > 24"Total minimum number of traverse points

0All sampling locations that havean upstream diameter less tha 0.5or a downstream diameter of lessthan 2.0 do not meet EPA Method1 specifications

2 9 8 7 24 20 12 4 8 16 #N/A #N/A N/A N/A N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 58.1

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 29.6 70.4 85.4 95.6

#N/A 

## TransAlta Centralia Coal-Fired Boiler Scrubber Outlets
inches inches inches inches see note Pass Pass

111.7 Downstream diameter (B): Number of ports being used: Equivalent upstream diameter (A): Outside port Distance (in) 21.7 2 2.521

#N/A 257.3 310.9 347.3 357.0 900.0 2736.0 6.00

341.3 #N/A 

## TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT (PARTICULATE) CIRCULAR STACKS OVER 24 INCHES

Pass

304.9 52.1 105.7 251.3 Port length:

Example: Location of 12 points Point % Diameter 6

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A DUCT AREA = 695.127
[No. 264-3.

Division Three.

May 28, 1971.]

#### Richard C. Hart, *Respondent,*v. Richard Shumway *et al., Appellants.*

*R. E. Mansfield,*for appellants.

*Kelly Hancock,*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment for damages against the defendants for breach of an oral logging contract. Defendants appeal.

This is a factual appeal wherein defendants claim *59there is insufficient evidence to support the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the trial court. We have carefully reviewed the entire record and conclude the findings are amply supported by the evidence. We will not substitute our findings for those of the trial court in such circumstance. *Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.,*54 Wn.2d 570, 343 P.2d 183 (1959). The findings of fact sustain the conclusions of law.

Judgment affirmed.
#### In re ESTATE of Rosella M. SAGER, Deceased. In re ESTATE of Dwight E. SAGER, Deceased.

Nos. 371, 372.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 5, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 16, 1967.

Granvel S. Kirkland, of Fee Parker & Neill, Fort Pierce, for appellants-Sager.

Angus Sumner, of Sumner & Bryan, Fort Pierce, for appellee-Winters.

CROSS, Judge.

This is an appeal by the residual beneficiaries, Dwight Sager, Jr., as guardian of Steven D. Sager and Stuart E. Sager, minors, and Dwight Sager, Jr., individually, from final orders of the county judge’s court awarding attorney’s fees and executrix’s fees in the Estates of Rosella M. Sager and Dwight E. Sager.

The primary thrust of this appeal is that the fees awarded were excessive.

This court has carefully reviewed this cause and all assignments of error and finds there is competent substantial evidence to support the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial judge..

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., concurs.

MACMILLAN, HUGH, Associate Judge, dissents.
# C_2020390EN.01004301.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/43

---

Action brought on 29 September 2020 — Skechers USA v EUIPO (ARCH FIT)

(Case T-598/20)

(2020/C 390/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Skechers USA, Inc. II (Manhattan Beach, California, United States) (represented by: T. Holman, A. Reid, Solicitors, J. Bogatz and Y. Stone, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark ARCH FIT — Application for registration No 18 079 677

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 July 2020 in Case R 2631/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,070,785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,603
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,373,407
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,525,208)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,225,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,613,312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,012,266
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,225,467
<SALES>                                      1,290,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,832,174
<CGS>                                          625,948
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  860,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               470,002
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             243,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,258,637
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,258,637
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,258,637
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit23.1**

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3Nos. 33-31932, 33-40222, 33-41854, 33-43856, 33-58766,333-110460, 333-115724, 333-15933, 333-24187 and 333-28415)of Magnetek, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses, and in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-31439, 33-33887, 33-34112,33-34834, 33-44519, 33-58929, 333-04021, 333-17889,333-45935, 333-45939, 333-90645, 333-90647 and 333-75418)pertaining to the 1987 Stock Option Plan of Magnetek, Inc., the Magnetek, Inc.FlexCare Plus Retirement Savings Plan, the 1989 Incentive Stock CompensationPlan of Magnetek, Inc., the Magnetek Unionized Employee Savings Plan, theAmended and Restated 1989 Incentive Stock Compensation Plan of Magnetek, Inc.,the Second Amended and Restated 1989 Incentive Stock Compensation Plan ofMagnetek, Inc., the Magnetek, Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock OptionPlan, the Magnetek, Inc. Deferred Investment Plan, the Magnetek, Inc.1997 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, the Magnetek, Inc. Amendedand Restated Director Compensation and Deferral Investment Plan, the 1999 StockIncentive Plan of Magnetek, Inc., the 2000 Employee Stock Plan of Magnetek, Inc.and the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Magnetek, Inc. of our reportsdated September 28, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and financial statement schedule of Magnetek, Inc. listedon Item 15(a), Magnetek, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Magnetek, Inc., included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended July 2, 2006.
|  | /s/ ERNST &  YOUNG LLP |
|--|----------------------------|

 

WoodlandHills, California

September 28, 2006

----
EXHIBIT 11

                  GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
          STATEMENTS OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (Unaudited)
                      (Millions, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
                                       Three Months
                                     Ended March 31,
                              ---------------------------
                                     1997      1996
                                     ----      ----
<S>                                   <C>       <C>
Income
-------------
Income before extraordinary item $     90  $     50
Extraordinary item, net of tax          -         -
                                 --------   -------

Net income                       $     90  $     50
                                 ========   =======

Weighted Average Shares
-----------------------
Common shares outstanding,
 net of restricted stock           90,979    90,478

Add - shares assumed to
 be issued under long-term
 incentive (restricted stock),
 stock option and stock
 purchase plans at the average
 market price                         380       563
                                 --------  --------

Primary shares                     91,359    91,041
                                 --------  --------

Add - additional shares assumed
 to be issued under long-term
 incentive (restricted stock),
 stock  option and stock
 purchase plans at quarter end
 market price (if higher than
 average market price)                  -         6
                                 --------  --------

Fully diluted shares               91,359    91,047
                                 ========   =======


Income Per Share
-----------------------
Income before extraordinary item $    .99  $    .55
Extraordinary item, net of tax        -         -
                                 --------  --------

Net income                       $    .99  $    .55
                                 ========   =======

Income Per Share - Primary
---------------------------------
Income before extraordinary item $    .99  $    .55
Extraordinary item, net of tax       -         -
                                 --------  --------

Net income                       $    .99  $    .55
                                 ========   =======



Income Per Share - Fully Diluted
---------------------------------------
Income before extraordinary item $    .99  $    .55
Extraordinary item, net of tax       -         -
                                 --------  --------

Net income                       $    .99  $    .55
                                 ========   =======

</TABLE>
A single presentation of income per share is made on the Statements of Income
because the effects of assuming issuance of common shares under long-term
incentive, stock option and stock purchase plans are either antidilutive or
insignificant.
#### Willie Frank JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-285.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 24, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Jose A. Gonzalez, Jr., Judge.

Appeal quashed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements included in the Form 10-K of American Safety Razor Company
for the year ended December 31, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000750339
<NAME>                                         AMERICAN SAFETY RAZOR COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1434
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  48738
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3461
<INVENTORY>                                    51488
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103308
<PP&E>                                         114649
<DEPRECIATION>                                 41706
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 254081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          38572
<BONDS>                                        121505
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       121
<OTHER-SE>                                     59318
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   254081
<SALES>                                        296607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               296607
<CGS>                                          196991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  196991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               595
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                24639
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9570
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            15069
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   15069
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.23
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         108,446
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,396
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               207,842
<PP&E>                                         542,736
<DEPRECIATION>                                 449,564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 795,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,129
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           849
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,379,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   795,765
<SALES>                                        142,771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,816
<CGS>                                           46,815
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               210,229
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (92,085)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (92,085)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (92,085)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Wallace J. CLOUD v. The Hon. Eugene W. McGEHEE, Division “I”, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge.

No. 61952.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 5, 1978.

In re: Wallace J. Cloud applying for writ of mandamus. East Baton Rouge Parish.

Writ denied. On the basis of return by the trial judge there is no merit in the application.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 21, 2011 

h1114 

Order 

 

November 21, 2011 

143465 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143465 

 COA: 303998 

CYNTHIA LITTLETON, Wayne CC: 10-002762-FH 

Defendant-Appellant. 10-002761-FH 

____________________________________/ 10-003284-FH 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court with 

instructions to amend the judgment of sentence in Case No. 10-002761-FH to reflect a 

sentence of 12 to 48 months in accordance with the sentence evaluation offered pursuant 

to People v Cobbs, 443 Mich 276 (1993). In all other respects, leave to appeal is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be 

reviewed by this Court.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Billy MOUDY.

No. 60370.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

Jesse L. Means, Jr., Wilson R. Ramshur, Willis & Ramshur, St. Francisville, for defendant-appellant.

Billy Moudy, in pro. per.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leon A. Picou, Jr., Dist. Atty., A. Z. Butterworth, Sp. Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.