alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00155-CR

MANUEL ALEJANDRO GARZA,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 371st District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1548886D)

February 17, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment and the attached Order to 

Withdraw Funds are modified to delete the $228 fine and the $25 time-payment fee

without prejudice to future assessment if, more than thirty days after mandate issues,

Manuel Alejandro Garza has failed to fully pay any fine, court cost, or restitution

imposed. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as modified.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
No. 11042.

#### Carter et al. *v.*Foss et al.

Decided January 26, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Lake county.

*Mr. Plarry E. Hammer*and *Messrs. Alvord & Reynolds,*for plaintiffs in error. *Mr. G. N. Tuttle; Mr. E. F. Blakely; Mr. Martin A. Tuttle*and *Mr. Homer Harper,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
 This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Krupp
Realty Fund 7 Financial Statements for the nine months ended December 31, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,254,160
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  275,083<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               493,350
<PP&E>                                      30,629,611<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                            (15,656,594)<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,995,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          808,885
<BONDS>                                     14,502,371<F4>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,684,354<F5>
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,995,610
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,795,059<F6>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,781,346<F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,164,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (151,137)<F8>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F8>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F8>
<FN>
<F1>Includes all receivables included in "prepaid expenses and other assets" on
 the Balance Sheet.
<F2>Multi-family complexes of $20,463,471, retail center of $9,742,806 and
deferred expenses of $423,334.
<F3>Accumulated depreciation of $15,523,683 and accumulated amortization of
$132,911.
<F4>Represents mortgage notes payable.
<F5>Total deficit of the General Partners of ($261,729) and equity of Limited
Partners of $2,946,083.
<F6>Includes all revenue of the Partnership.
<F7>Includes operating expenses of $1,848,242, real estate taxes of $465,010 and
depreciation and amortization of $1,468,094.
<F8>Net loss allocated ($1,511)to the General Partners and ($149,626) to the
Limited Partners.  Average net loss per Unit of Limited Partner interest is
($5.50).






</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JAMES DAVID HELMUTH, § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

James David Helmuth pleaded guilty to continuing sexual abuse of a child, and the jury

assessed punishment at thirty-five years. He now attempts to appeal his conviction. We have

received the trial court’s certification showing that Appellant waived his right to appeal. See TEX.

R.APP. P. 25.2(d). The certification is signed by the trial court, Appellant, and Appellant’s counsel.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered April 8, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
No. 11314.

#### Caito *v.*Smiley, Exr., et al.

Decided December 15, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Messrs. Morse, Tuttle & Harper*and *Messrs. Healy, Ferris & McAvoy,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Powell & Smiley; Mr. John Nicholas; Mr. Samuel A. West*and *Mr. B. T. Archer,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Sitaucic, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
Mnnd:\torv Honitori.n('f Rcnuircmr.nt!J 

·1-1onitoring in!ltru.'llcnt!l shall be ·provided, installed, calibrated, maint~incd and continuou::.ly ope::-at:ed by the owner of the following 

stntionary !lOurce C<ltegorie!l to meu!lurc air c.o:1t<Hninant crni::.s ion~ or 

Op3city fr6m Dource~ for which there i::. an applicable federal, !lt~tc, 

or locul cmi::.sion standard. 

(1) Fo:Jsil-fucl fired sten.:n generator!> v.•ith a heat input of 250 

million Briti!lh 'l'he::-rn<::.l Unit~ (63 r.tillion }:ilosru;n ci:!loric!l) 

or mora per hour with a u~c factor of at lea::;t 300~ per yc3r. 

n. Oxides of nitrogen. 

b. Carbon dioxide or oxygen. 

c. Opacity except: where gnseous fuel i::. the only fuel 

burned, or \·:here oil or a mixture of CJ<l!l and oil is the 

only fuel burned and the source i~ able to comply with the 

applicable p~rticulatc matter and op~city regulations 

without collection equipment, and v:hcrc the source hil!l not 

been found since occe~cr 31, 1970, through admini~trative 

or judicinl. proceeding!l, to be in viol~tion of Regulation 

1 of the North Coast Air nasin. 

d. so2 , if control cquip~ent is used. 

(2) All sulfur recovery plants and sulfuric ucid plants, so2. 

(3) Nitric Acid Pl~nts 

n. All new nitric acid plants, oxides of nitrogen. 

b. All cxi~ting nitric acid plants of greater than 300 tons 

per duy production cap~city. the production cupucity 

being expressed as 100 percent ucid, oxides of nitrogen. 

·(4) CO boilers of rcgcncrator!l of fluid catalytic cracking units; 

CO boilcr9 of fluid coker~ if feed rate i~ greater ~1cn 10.000 

barrel~ (1,500,000 liter2) per duy. 

b. Op;,.city. 

All nlon i tor ing cnlibrn tion~, reporting requirement!~ and spec if icn t:io; 

slmll be in accor~nncc with the rcquirornent:2 of ,\ppcndix D of thin 

_Regulation 1 of the California North connt J\ir nanin.
# C_2022368EN.01002003.xml

| 26.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/20

---

Order of the President of the Court of 1 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Holland — Netherlands) — Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane, kantoor Eindhoven

(Case C-809/21) (1)

(2022/C 368/34)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 28.3.2022.

---
# C_2022432EN.01000601.xml

| 14.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2022 — Health Information Management (HIM) v European Commission

(Case C-500/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Arbitration clause - Grant agreements concluded under the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Policy Support Programme - Audit report - Debit notes issued by the European Commission for the recovery of certain sums - Action for annulment - Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) - Counterclaim - Full repayment of the grants concerned - Rights of the defence - Principle of sound administration - Impartiality - Principle of proportionality - Obligation to state reasons)

(2022/C 432/07)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Health Information Management (HIM) (represented by: P. Zeegers, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà and M. Ilkova, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Health Information Management (HIM) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Health Information Management (HIM) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 391, 27.9.2021

---
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Whitemark Homes, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:August
              14, 2006
            
            /s/
              *William
              D. Rigsby*William
                D. Rigsby
              Chief
                Executive Officer




Date:August
              14, 2006
            
            /s/*Russ
                Christensen*Russ
                Christensen
              Acting
                Principal Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Whitemark Homes, Inc. and will be retained
      by Whitemark Homes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
#### David CHRISTIAN and Bruce Morehouse, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-251.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 18, 1972.

*84Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Lewis S. Kimler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants were charged and convicted of possession of marijuana, for which they were sentenced to confinement in the county jail for a period of thirty days, and placed on probation for a year. They were arrested for soliciting a ride on a public roadway. In their possession were two back packs and a pillow case. Inventory search thereof at the police station revealed the marijuana in the pillow case. Both defendants admitted ownership of the contents of the pillow case, including the marijuana.

Appellants contend the trial court erred in denying their motion to suppress such evidence; in admitting their inculpa-tory statements; and that the evidence was insufficient to prove the allegation of their possession of the marijuana. Upon consideration thereof in the light of the record and briefs we hold those contentions are without merit. The motion to suppress was properly denied. State v. Gustafson, Fla.1972, 258 So.2d 1. The defendants’ admission of ownership of the marijuana was made following due information as to their rights, in accordance with the Miranda decision. No objection was made in the trial court, on constitutional grounds, to the admission thereof. The evidence of possession was sufficient.

Affirmed.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 94

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses

of investigations and studies by the Committee on the Judiciary in

the first session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 18, 1993

Mr. BROOKS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House

for expenses of investigations and studies by the Committee on the Judiciary in the first session of the One

Hundred Third Congress.

1 Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and

2 studies by the Committee on the Judiciary (hereinafter in

3 this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including

4 expenses for provision of assistance for members of profes5 sional staff in obtaining specialized training under section

6 202(j) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946,

7 there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House

8 not more than $2,764,007.
2

•HRES 94 IH

1 (b) Not more than $5,000 of the amount specified

2 in subsection (a) may be used for specialized training re3 ferred to in such subsection.

4 SEC. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made

5 on vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

6 Chairman of the Committee, and approved by the Commit7 tee on House Administration.

8 SEC. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolu9 tion for investigations and studies carried out during the

10 period beginning at noon on January 3, 1993, and ending

11 immediately before noon on January 3, 1994.

12 SEC. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution

13 shall be expended in accordance with regulations pre14 scribed by the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
# C_2020443EN.01002601.xml

| 21.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 443/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 443/26

---

Action brought on 21 October 2020 — Dermavita Company v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVÉDERM VOLUMA)

(Case T-636/20)

(2020/C 443/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dermavita Company SARL (Beirut, Lebanon) (represented by: D. Todorov, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Allergan Holdings France SAS (Courbevoie, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark JUVÉDERM VOLUMA –European Union trade mark No 6 547 301

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 August 2020 in Case R 1016/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | ask EUIPO to deem the appeal filed; |
| --- | --- |

—

ask EUIPO to deem the appeal filed;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the Applicant before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the Applicant before the General Court.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 101(4), 104, 106 and 107 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 101(4), 104, 106 and 107 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2022198EN.01004602.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Ionfarma v EUIPO — LG Electronics (AION)

(Case T-465/21) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark AION - Earlier national figurative mark ION and earlier word mark IONFARMA - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2022/C 198/67)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ionfarma, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: S. Correa Rodríguez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Lapinskaite and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 May 2021 (Case R 2223/2020-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Ionfarma and LG Electronics.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ionfarma, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ionfarma, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 382, 20.9.2021.

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135822(70) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135822 

 COA: 270194 

Wayne CC: 06-001037-01

ANTHONY DWAYNE JAMES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 28, 

2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d0721 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 29, 2008 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 61 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                   House Calendar No. 9

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. RES. 61

                          [Report No. 103-12]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
 consideration of a certain resolution reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            February 3, 1993

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                   House Calendar No. 9
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 61

                          [Report No. 103-12]

    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
 consideration of a certain resolution reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1993

    Mr. Gordon, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI for a two-
thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is hereby waived with respect to 
a resolution providing for consideration of a bill relating to family 
and temporary medical leave for certain employees.
```
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, that:
 
 (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2009 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: July 13, 2009/s/Larry VanceLarry VanceChief Executive Officer
 
 This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
Exhibit 32.1

                              THE GILLETTE COMPANY
                                 Certification
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
                                     Code)


Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code, the undersigned, James M. Kilts,  Chief Executive Officer
of The Gillette Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Date:   October 28, 2004                   /s/ James M. Kilts
                                           ___________________________________
                                           James M. Kilts
                                           Chairman of the Board, President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Gillette Company (the "Company") and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.