alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1997, Statement of Operations and
Statement of Cash Flows for the period ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          17,678
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,245
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,344
<INVENTORY>                                     83,495
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               219,216
<PP&E>                                          48,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,680
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 558,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          195,133
<BONDS>                                        131,951
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     95,825
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   558,626
<SALES>                                        405,458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               405,458
<CGS>                                          147,708
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  147,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               215,171
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   375
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,334
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,297
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,110
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,187
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,187
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1050

To designate the Federal building located at 525 Griffin Street in Dallas,

Texas, as the ‘‘A. Maceo Smith Federal Building’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 27 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. MITCHELL (for Mr. KRUEGER) introduced the following bill; which was

read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 525 Griffin

Street in Dallas, Texas, as the ‘‘A. Maceo Smith Federal

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 525 Griffin Street

5 in Dallas, Texas, is designated as the ‘‘A. Maceo Smith

6 Federal Building’’.

7 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record,

9 map, or other paper of the United States to the building
2

S 1050 IS

1 referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference to

2 the ‘‘A. Maceo Smith Federal Building’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          10,039
<SECURITIES>                                    36,782
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,128
<ALLOWANCES>                                       188
<INVENTORY>                                        264
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,547
<PP&E>                                           9,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,137
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,451
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,307
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,911
<SALES>                                         66,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,324
<CGS>                                           10,479
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,213)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,958
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,385
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,573
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,573
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.26


</TABLE>
#### James Edward WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-301.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 10, 1971.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Warren H. Petersen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446.

LILES, Acting C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 573

Requiring Members of the House of Representatives to pay, from the Official

Expenses Allowance, the actual cost of extraneous matter printed in

that portion of the Congressional Record entitled ‘‘Extensions of Remarks’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 6, 1994

Mr. POMEROY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Requiring Members of the House of Representatives to pay,

from the Official Expenses Allowance, the actual cost

of extraneous matter printed in that portion of the Congressional Record entitled ‘‘Extensions of Remarks’’.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. PAYMENT REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN EXTEN3 SIONS OF REMARKS.

4 In each case of extraneous matter printed in that por5 tion of the Congressional Record entitled ‘‘Extensions of

6 Remarks’’, the actual cost involved shall be paid out of

7 the Official Expenses Allowance of the Member who sub8 mits the matter. The amounts so paid shall be credited
2

•HRES 573 IH

1 to the applicable appropriation relating to publication of

2 the Congressional Record.

3 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF THE SPEAKER.

4 The Speaker shall have authority to specify such

5 standards and to make such determinations as may be

6 necessary to assure compliance with this resolution.

7 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

8 As used in this resolution—

9 (1) the term ‘‘actual cost’’ means the actual

10 cost, as determined by the Public Printer;

11 (2) the term ‘‘extraneous matter’’ means matter

12 not related to the legislative business of the day; and

13 (3) the term ‘‘Member of the House of Rep14 resentatives’’ means a Representative in, or a Dele15 gate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress.

Æ
Exhibit 24 - Consent of Registered Public Accountants

 

 

MOE O’SHAUGHNESSY & ASSOCIATES, P.S.Certified Public Accountants

 

CONSENT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

Board of DirectorsElectronic Systems Technology, Inc.Kennewick, Washington

 

We hereby consent to the use of our opinion, dated February 16, 2007,on the financial statements of Electronic Systems Technology, Inc., for the years endedDecember 31, 2006 and 2005 in the Form 10-KSB.

 

MOE O'SHAUGHNESSY & ASSOCIATES, P.S.
/s/ JENNY E. ANDERSON

Jenny E. Anderson,Certified Public Accountant

 

Spokane, WashingtonFebruary 23, 2007

427 W. Sinto Avenue, Ste. 200, Spokane, Washington 99201Phone (509) 325-4900  Fax (509-325-9345 E-Mail moaps@qwest.net
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1089

To extend the existing suspension of duty on 6-Hydroxy-2-naphthalenesulfonic

acid, and its sodium, potassium, and ammonium salts.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 10, 1993

Mr. DANFORTH (for himself and Mr. KOHL) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To extend the existing suspension of duty on 6-Hydroxy2-naphthalenesulfonic acid, and its sodium, potassium,

and ammonium salts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF

4 DUTY ON 6-HYDROXY-2-NAPHTHALENE5 SULFONIC ACID, AND ITS SODIUM, POTAS6 SIUM, AND AMMONIUM SALTS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.10 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended

9 by striking ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/95’’.

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—
2

•S 1089 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered,

3 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on

4 or after the 15th day after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act.

6 (2) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION TO CERTAIN

7 ENTRIES.—Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tar8 iff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provi9 sion of law, upon proper request filed with the ap10 propriate customs officer before the 90th day after

11 the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, or

12 withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any

13 goods described in subheading 9902.29.10 of the

14 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States

15 that was made—

16 (A) after December 31, 1992; and

17 (B) before the 15th day after the date of

18 the enactment of this Act;

19 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though the

20 amendment made by subsection (a) applied to such

21 entry or withdrawal.

Æ
J

- A16014

- 23

NON

- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

- SEE SUPERIOR COURT O.P. 65.37

LEONARD J. GITTER

v.

ELENA BELOGOLOVSKY

Appellant :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1664 MDA 2022

Appeal from the Order Entered November 18, 2022 In the Court of Common Pleas of Union County Civil Division at No(s): 17

- 0702

BEFORE: PANELLA, P.J., BENDER, P.J.E., and McCAFFERY, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, P.J.: FILED: AUGUST 18, 2023

This case having been remanded to the trial court by way of this Court’s

Order and Memorandum Opinion filed June 16, 2023, and there being no merit

to the argument that the trial court should recuse, this appeal is hereby

quashed so that the matter may ret urn to the trial court for a determination

in accordance with the June 16, 2023 remand with instructions. See L.J.G. v.

E.B. , No. 1261 MDA 2022 (Pa. Super. Filed June 16, 2023) (unpublished

memorandum). 1

Appeal quashed.

_________________ __________ ______ ____ _______

1 In her appellate brief at this docket number, filed before our decision in 1261 MDA 2022, Appellant conceded that a resolution of that appeal “may render some or all the issues raised in this appeal moot.” Appellant’s Brief at 2.J

- A16014

- 23

- 2

-

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 8 / 18 /2023
[No. 571-41016-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

July 19, 1971.]

#### Joseph S. Pratto, *Appellant,*v. Lucy Ann Pratto, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. D-920, Richard J. Ennis, J., entered February 11, 1969. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
Exhibit 31.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Mary G. Merritt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Preferred Voice,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c. presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


/s/ Mary G. Merritt
-------------------
Mary G. Merritt
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer
  and Principal Financial Officer)
November 14, 2005


                                       18
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 453 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 453

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
                        the situation in Rwanda.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 1994

Mr. Hastings submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
                        the situation in Rwanda.

Whereas an ethnic cleansing of the minority Tutsi tribe is being carried out by 
        the majority Hutu tribe in Rwanda;
Whereas as many as 500,000 innocent people may have been slaughtered;
Whereas there has been little to no progress in brokering a cease-fire after 
        more than two months of slaughter;
Whereas international observers have stated that a cease-fire does not seem to 
        be forthcoming;
Whereas more than 500,000 children have been orphaned;
Whereas Catholic clergy have been executed;
Whereas millions of people face starvation;
Whereas the United Nations has been unable to resolve the conflict in Rwanda;
Whereas the United States on February 25, 1989, ratified and entered into the 
        Convention of the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide;
Whereas the convention stipulates that genocide, whether committed during peace 
        or war, is an international crime which must be prevented and punished; 
        and
Whereas the Convention defines genocide as the intentional destruction of any 
        national, ethnic, racial, or religious group, in whole or in part, by 
        killing its members, causing them serious physical or mental harm, 
        imposing conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical 
        destruction: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) strongly condemns the atrocities being carried out in 
        Rwanda; and
            (2) calls such atrocities genocide.

                                 <all>
```
#### Daniel Pinkowski, Respondent, v All-States Sawing and Trenching, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[736 NYS2d 769]

Mugglin, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Nolan, Jr., J.), entered November 27, 2000 in Saratoga County, which denied a motion by defendants All-States Sawing and Trenching, Inc. and Justin Balog to, inter alia, stay the action against them.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries sustained in two separate accidents, one of which *874involved a motor vehicle owned by defendant All-States Sawing and Trenching, Inc. and driven by defendant Justin Balog (hereinafter collectively referred to as defendants). Six months later, after issue was joined, defendants moved to stay the action against them and sever the causes of action against them from those against defendant Frank Ryan. The stay was sought on the ground that Balog was in active military service and would soon be stationed in Germany *(see,*Military Law § 304). Supreme Court denied the motion and defendants appeal.

We reject defendants’ argument that they established a prima facie entitlement to a stay pursuant to Military Law § 304 by asserting that Balog was in active military service in Germany. Both Military Law § 304 and its federal counterpart require a showing that the ability to prosecute or defend the action will be materially affected by the military service *(see, Guzman v Warenda,*161 AD2d 1017, 1018, *appeal dismissed 76*NY2d 885). As noted by Supreme Court, defendants’ motion papers contained no claim that their defense would be materially affected by Balog’s military service.

On appeal, defendants contend that Balog’s testimony, in person at trial, is essential to the defense. Nothing in the record demonstrates that, as a result of his military service, Balog will in fact be unavailable to so testify. Nor is there anything in the record to demonstrate that this action was anywhere near ready for trial when defendants moved for the stay. Assuming, as defense counsel “anticipates,” that Balog will be stationed in Germany for three years, there is no claim that defendants’ ability to prepare for trial will be materially affected or that there is some impediment which will prevent Ba-log from appearing at trial. Accordingly, we find no abuse of discretion in Supreme Court’s refusal to stay the action and, inasmuch as defendants do not otherwise seek review of the severance aspect of the motion, the order is affirmed.

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6002

ROBERT L. GROOMS, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SUPERINTENDENT, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (CA-04-673-7)

Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 2, 2005

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert L. Grooms, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert L. Grooms, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) without prejudice. The order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Grooms has not made the requisite

showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We also deny Grooms’ motion to appoint counsel

and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 87 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 87

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
 investigations and studies by the Committee on Post Office and Civil 
    Service in the first session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 17, 1993

Mr. Clay submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
 investigations and studies by the Committee on Post Office and Civil 
    Service in the first session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

    Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and studies by 
the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service (hereinafter in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including expenses for 
procurement of consultant services under section 202(i) of the 
Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, there shall be paid out of the 
contingent fund of the House not more than $1,997,572.
    (b) Not more than $175,000 of the amount specified in subsection 
(a) may be used for consultant services referred to in such subsection.
    Sec. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers 
authorized by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, 
and approved by the Committee on House Administration.
    Sec. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolution for 
investigations and studies carried out during the period beginning at 
noon on January 3, 1993, and ending immediately before noon on January 
3, 1994.
    Sec. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution shall be 
expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on 
House Administration.

                                 <all>
```