alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                    ACT MANUFACTURING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   Computation of Net Income Per Common Share

                 Twelve Months Ended December 31, 1999 and 1998
                      (in thousands except per share data)
                                  (unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Twelve Months
                                                                     Ended
                                                                ---------------
                                                                 1999    1998
                                                                ------- -------
<S>                                                             <C>     <C>
BASIC NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

Net income as reported......................................... $ 6,234 $ 3,093
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
  Common Stock.................................................  13,265  12,665
                                                                ------- -------

  Basic net income per common share............................ $   .47 $   .24

DILUTED NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

Net income as reported......................................... $ 6,234 $ 3,093
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
  Common stock.................................................  13,265  12,665
  Effect of stock options......................................     651     311
                                                                ------- -------

  Diluted net income per common share.......................... $   .45 $   .24
</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROBERT LEE HALL, III,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-888

[June 7, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence M. Mirman, 

Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 432013CF000875A, 432013CF000951A and 

432013CF000953A.

Robert Lee Hall, III, Jasper, pro se.

No response required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### S. Leo GRICE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clyde HAY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13427.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Sept. 26, 1977.

Evans & Auer by Frank M. Auer, Shreveport, for defendant-appellant.

Baker, Culpepper & Brunson by Bobby L. Culpepper, Jonesboro, Hal R. Henderson, Arcadia, for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIUM.

Upon lodging of the record in this case involving a possessory action, the court noted probable lack of jurisdiction due to failure of the appellant to post an appeal bond within the thirty-day period for taking an appeal provided by LSA-C.C.P. Arts. 3662, 2123 and 2087.

Appellant was notified of our probable lack of jurisdiction and failed to respond to our order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed.

Judgment was signed May 13, 1977. Appellant applied for a new trial on May 24, which motion was denied June 14. Appellant timely filed a motion for appeal on July 12, but failed to furnish security until July 18 which was not timely.

At appellant’s cost, the appeal is dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles NEWMAN.

No. 54153.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1973.

In re: Charles Newman applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and/or mandamus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
## Facility Data

Facility Name - DEC ID 

### Utica Metal Products **6-3016-00065** Address 1526 Lincoln Ave. Utica, NY 13502 Type of business Job Shop # of Employees 

### 73 Hours of Operation per year 

### 2500 Annual Revenue ($) 

### 5,000,000 

## Process Type Decorative electroplating 

## Tank Design and Operation Dim ensions (inches) 

### 34L x 22Wx 36H Rectifier Capacity 

### 0-12 volts, 750 amps, 9 KW Annual Hours of Operation 

### 2500 

## Emisison Control Technology Type of control/control device fume supressant - Zero-Mist Liquid R control device operating parameters 45 dynes/cm Em ission test data Complete test report 

## Exhaust design Em ission point EP00002

Stack height (m) 

### 9.7536 32 feet Stack diameter (m) 

### 0.256 inches: 16.5 Lx 19.25 W Exit velocity

(m/sec) 

### 2.05 6.725 ft/sec cubic meters per minute 

### 25 890 cfm Exit temperature (K) 

### 294 70 degrees F 

## Other Available Supporting Documents Em ission Inventory

Report 1997 Chromium release lbs/yr 

### 0.01 Permit Application/Operating permit Title V - online http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/32249.html Process flow diagrams/plant layout Attached: 3 drawings in 2 filesinches: 16.5 Lx 19.25 W 6.725 ft/sec 70 degrees FRinse Rinse Drip tray Rinse Rinse Nickel Rinse Bright Nickel Vat

Sem i Bright Nickel Rinse

Rinse Rectifier Controls

Chrome Plating Tank

Ni Strip

Nickel Activator Pickleen AS-10 Hot Rinse

Not to Scale DI Rinse Rinse Warm rinse Rinse Zincate Electro Cleaner Sparkleen 367 Caustic Rinse Nickel Pickle 5% Rinse

### Nickel Chrome Plate

tank length width depth freeboard **activator** 36 36 36 4 202.02 179.57 **160 cleaner** 48 30 36 4 224.47 199.53 **nickel pickle** 60 30 36 3 280.58 257.20 **Semi-bright nickel** 72 30 36 4 336.70 299.29 **Bright nickel** 72 30 36 4 336.70 299.29 **chrome** 34 22 36 4 116.60 103.64 **chrome spray rinse** 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81 **chrome rinse 1** 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81 **chrome rinse 2** 24 24 36 4 3.00 79.81 **chrome rinse 3** 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81 **chrome rinse hot** 24 24 36 4 89.79 79.81



# Process Tank Volumes

maximum volume operating

volume
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, each of the undersigned officers of GlycoGenesys, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



|(1) | the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Report.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 23, 2005



|       |  |                    |  |        |  |                     
|------ |  | ------------------ |  | ------ |  | --------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ John W. Burns  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Bradley J Carver
|Name:  |  | John W. Burns      |  | Name:  |  | Bradley J Carver    
|Title: |  | SVP, CFO Secretary |  | Title: |  | CEO President
Exhibit 31.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (Exchange Act), pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Burt Sugarman, certify that:



1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the third quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (Quarterly Report) of GIANT GROUP, LTD. (Company or Registrant);



2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to us by others within the Company, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Quarterly
Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants Board of Directors:



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|Dated: |  | November 13, 2003                    
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Burt Sugarman                    
|      
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,938
<SECURITIES>                                        92
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,914
<ALLOWANCES>                                       307
<INVENTORY>                                      1,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,518
<PP&E>                                           6,287
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,911
<BONDS>                                          1,302
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           762
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,232
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,674
<SALES>                                         12,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,345
<CGS>                                            3,308
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,315
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,596
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,719
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,719
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $4.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Earnings of Gerber Scientific, Inc.
as of and for the nine-month period ended January 31, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          25,743
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     70,520
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               203,163
<PP&E>                                         129,543
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,039
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 334,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,006
<BONDS>                                          7,002
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,392
<OTHER-SE>                                     217,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   334,265
<SALES>                                        310,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               310,189
<CGS>                                          171,304
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  289,329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,388)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,982
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,282
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,282
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
        

</TABLE>
#### Jeremy Wilcox CARROLL, formerly Jeremy Wilcox Allen, Appellant, v. Frederick Corey ALLEN, Appellee.

No. 1071.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 25, 1970.

Appeal from Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court, Palm Beach County; Emery J. Newell, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Rudolph HOLMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-231.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

May 9, 1969.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; Edward J. Hanlon, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Taitron Components Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 
 Dated:  March 31, 2010
By:
/s/ Stewart WangStewart WangChief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)Dated:  March 31, 2010
By:
/s/ David VanderhorstDavid VanderhorstChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
# C_2020271EN.01004201.xml

| 17.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/42

---

Action brought on 7 June 2020 — Kozhuvchanka uvoz-izvoz Kavadarci v EUIPO (NASHE MAKEDONSKO PILSNER BEER MACEDONIAN PREMIUM BEER)

(Case T-357/20)

(2020/C 271/53)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Applicant: Drushtvo za proizvodvsto, trgovija i uslugi Kozhuvchanka d.o.o. uvoz-izvoz Kavadarci (Kavadarci, Republic of North Macedonia) (represented by: A. Ivanova, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for registration of European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘NASHE MAKEDONSKO PILSNER BEER MACEDONIAN PREMIUM BEER’ — Application for registration No 17 967 530

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 April 2020 in Case R 1729/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | allow the action and declare that the trade mark application may proceed to registration. |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the action and declare that the trade mark application may proceed to registration.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
cc: Hon. Jennifer Elliott, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Patrick Raymond Ty11 

Roger P. Croteau & Associates, Ltd. 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 44e*
#### Edward M. HAYES, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of his minor child, Jack E. Hayes v. F. A. TALLEY, Administrator of the Estate of his minor child, Frank Earl Talley and the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company.

No. 8264.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

March 15, 1971.

Iddo Pittman, Jr., of Pittman & Matheny, Hammond, for appellant.

Dale E. Branch of Seal, Lee & Branch, Bogalusa, Richard P. Massony, of McDonald & Buchler, Metairie, Martin A. Smith, Jr., of Fritchie, Fritchie & Smith, Slidell, for appellees.

Before LANDRY, ELLIS and BLANCHE, JJ.

BLANCHE, Judge.

For the reasons set forth in the consolidated case entitled “Jack R. Welch and Willis C. McDonald vs. Edward M. Hayes, F. A. Talley, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company,” No. 8263, La.App., 246 So.2d 864, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, with all costs assessed to defendant-appellant.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 479 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 479

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 14, 1994.
    Resolved, That Senate amendment No. 104 to the bill H.R. 4539 making 
appropriations for the Treasury Department, the United States Postal Service, 
the Executive Office of the President, and certain Independent Agencies, for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes, in the opinion of 
this House, contravenes the first clause of the seventh section of the first 
article of the Constitution of the United States and is an infringement of the 
privileges of this House and that such bill with the Senate amendments thereto 
be respectfully returned to the Senate with a message communicating this 
resolution.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Richard M. ADLER v. Susan ADLER.

No. 62705.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 15, 1978.

In re: Richard M. Adler, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, CALOGERO, and MARCUS, JJ., would grant a writ.
No. 10725.

#### Freese et al., Exrs., v. Freese.

Decided February 23, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Crawford county.

*Mr. W. J. Geer,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Kennedy & Kennedy*and *Messrs. Leuthold & Leuthold,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
#### Dennis M. SKOP v. Carl D. BROREIN.

No. 38797.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 222 So.2d 250.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

         The undersigned, Thomas C. Shields, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



Dated:  March 3, 2003


                                                   /s/ Thomas C. Shields
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Thomas C. Shields
                                                   Senior Vice President
                                                   and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2021320EN.01001401.xml

| 9.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/14

---

Appeal brought on 1 April 2021 by Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 27 January 2021 in Case T-817/19, Olimp Laboratories v EUIPO

(Case C-219/21 P)

(2021/C 320/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. (represented by: M. Kondrat, adwokat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

By order of 24 June 2021, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. shall bear its own costs.

---