Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2018
                              Kim Lehnert, Psychology, PhD, PLLC, DAB CR5186 (2018)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Kim Lehnert, Psychology, PhD, PLLC, DAB CR5186 (2018)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Kim Lehnert, Psychology, PhD, PLLC,
	Petitioner
	v.
	Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-18-1125Decision No. CR5186September 17, 2018

        
              
    

      DECISION
The request for hearing of Petitioner, Kim Lehnert, Psychology, PhD, PLLC, is dismissed pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 498.70(c).1
  Petitioner’s request for hearing was not timely filed and Petitioner has not shown good cause to extend the time for filing the request for hearing.
I.  Background and Facts
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) notified Petitioner by letter dated February 28, 2018, that CMS determined on reconsideration not to change the effective date of her opt-out period.  CMS advised Petitioner that if she was unsatisfied with the reconsidered determination she could request a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ).  CMS advised Petitioner that she must file a request for hearing within 60 days of receipt of the CMS notice of the reconsidered determination.  CMS Exhibit (Ex.) 1 at 1-4.
Petitioner requested a hearing before an ALJ by letter dated June 26, 2018, postmarked July 2, 2018, which is the date of filing.
Page 2
Petitioner’s request for hearing was docketed and assigned to me on July 18, 2018.  I issued an Acknowledgement and Prehearing Order on July 18, 2018 (Prehearing Order).  On August 7, 2018, CMS filed a motion to dismiss (CMS Motion) Petitioner’s request for hearing on grounds that it was not timely filed.  Pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 498.17(b), Petitioner had 20 days or until August 27, 2018, to respond to the CMS motion to dismiss.  Petitioner filed no response and, thereby, waived the right to do so.
II.  Issues, Conclusions
**A.  Issues**
Whether good cause exists to extend the time for filing the request for hearing in this case; and
Whether the request for hearing should be dismissed because it was untimely filed.
**B.  Applicable Law**
If CMS notifies a physician or practitioner of a determination that the physician or practitioner has failed to timely renew his or her opt‐out, the physician or practitioner has a right to request a reconsidered determination and review by an ALJ in accordance with 42 C.F.R. pt. 498.  42 C.F.R. §§ 405.450(a), 498.3(b)(19), 498.5.  The regulations are clear regarding the requirements for timely filing a request for hearing:
The affected party or its legal representative or other authorized official must file the request in writing within 60 days from receipt of the notice of initial, reconsidered, or revised determination unless that period is extended . . . .
42 C.F.R. § 498.40(a)(2).  The 60-day period runs from the date of receipt by the affected party, which is presumed to be five days after the date of the notice, unless it is shown that the notice was received earlier or later.  42 C.F.R. §§ 498.40(a)(2), 498.22(b)(3).
I have the discretion to extend the period for filing a request for hearing if the petitioner files a “written request for extension of time stating the reasons why the request was not filed timely,” and I find good cause for the late filing is shown.  42 C.F.R. § 498.40(c).  Although the legislative history for 42 C.F.R. § 498.40 is not helpful in understanding the application of these regulatory provisions in this case, the requirement for timely filing a written request for hearing is commonly viewed as the means by which administrative finality can be achieved, i.e., if there is no deadline for filing and an affected party may file at any time, the record on an action may never be closed.
Page 3
I may dismiss an untimely request for hearing, if I do not grant an extension of the time to file.  42 C.F.R. § 498.70(c).
**C.  Conclusions of Law and Analysis**
My conclusions of law are set forth in bold followed by my findings of fact and discussion.
**1.  Petitioner failed to file her request for hearing within the 60-day period provided by the regulation.  42 C.F.R. § 498.40(a)(2).**
**2.  Petitioner has not shown good cause to extend the period for filing her request for hearing by 54 days.  42 C.F.R. § 498.40(c).**
**3.  Dismissal of Petitioner’s request for hearing pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 498.70(c) is appropriate.**
The CMS notice of the reconsidered determination in this case is dated February 28, 2018.  CMS Ex. 1 at 1.  CMS concedes that the notice was not mailed until March 5, 2018.  CMS Motion at 1, 4; CMS Ex. 2.  Pursuant to 42 C.F.R. §§ 498.40(a)(2) and 498.22(b)(3), it is presumed that Petitioner received the CMS notice on March 10, 2018, five days after it was actually mailed.  The evidence does not show that Petitioner received the notice either earlier or later than March 10, 2018.
Petitioner had 60 days from receipt of the CMS notice to file her request for hearing.  Therefore, Petitioner had until Wednesday, May 9, 2018, to file her request for hearing.  Petitioner did not file her request for hearing until it was postmarked by the United States Postal Service on July 2, 2018.  Petitioner missed the deadline for filing her request for hearing by 54 days.  Therefore, Petitioner’s request for hearing was filed late.
I am granted discretion by 42 C.F.R. § 498.70(c) to dismiss a request for hearing that is not timely filed and for which the time for filing has not been extended.  Therefore, dismissal is permitted in this case if I determine not to extend the period for filing the request for hearing by 54 days.
Pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 498.40(c)(2), I may only extend the period for filing a request for hearing for good cause.  Petitioner has not responded to the CMS motion to dismiss and does not assert good cause exists.  Petitioner did not acknowledge in her request for hearing that it was untimely or request an extension of time to file.  Nevertheless, I have examined the record to determine whether there is good cause to extend the time for filing the request for hearing.  I conclude good cause for an extension has not been shown under any reasonable definition of the term.
Page 4
The regulations do not define the term “good cause.”  Furthermore, the Departmental Appeals Board (Board) has never provided a precise or complete definition of “good cause.”  *West Side House LTC Facility*, DAB No. 2791 at 5‐6 (2017) (citing *Rutland Nursing Home*, DAB No. 2582 at 5 (2014)).  Relevant Board decisions turn on evaluation of the facts and determination on a case-by-case basis whether the facts fit within any reasonable definition of good cause.  *See e.g.*, *West Side*, DAB No. 2791; *Rutland*, DAB No. 2582; *Nursing Inn of Menlo Park*, DAB No. 1812 (2002); *Cary Health & Rehab. Ctr.*, DAB No. 1771 at 27 (2001).
I have examined Petitioner’s request for hearing and the various supporting documents she submitted as well as the exhibits offered by CMS.  Petitioner explained the unfortunate family circumstances that contributed to her failure to timely attend to her opt‐out status.  But, the circumstances that she presented do not address why she failed to timely file her request for hearing.  I conclude that good cause does not exist to extend the period for filing the request for hearing by 54 days.  Accordingly, the request for hearing is dismissed.
III.  Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner’s request for hearing is dismissed.


          /s/
        Keith W. Sickendick

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. References are to the 2017 revision of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.), unless otherwise indicated. back to note 1 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back