alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020433EN.01006201.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/62

---

Action brought on 15 October 2020 — JP v Commission

(Case T-638/20)

(2020/C 433/77)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: JP (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of 17 July 2019 not placing the applicant on the reserve list of successful candidates of Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 — Administrators (AD7), along with the decision of 10 December 2019 rejecting the Applicant’s request for review; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 17 July 2019 not placing the applicant on the reserve list of successful candidates of Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 — Administrators (AD7), along with the decision of 10 December 2019 rejecting the Applicant’s request for review;

| — | annul the decision of 7 July 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 5 March 2020; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 7 July 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 5 March 2020;

| — | order the defendant to compensate the damages suffered by the applicant; and, |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to compensate the damages suffered by the applicant; and,

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging, firstly, an infringement of the principle according to which the members of the Selection Board shall have the necessary abilities to make an objective assessment of the performance and professional qualifications of the candidate during the field-related interview, secondly, a breach of the principle of equal treatment, and finally, a breach of the principle of legitimate expectations. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging, firstly, an infringement of the principle according to which the members of the Selection Board shall have the necessary abilities to make an objective assessment of the performance and professional qualifications of the candidate during the field-related interview, secondly, a breach of the principle of equal treatment, and finally, a breach of the principle of legitimate expectations.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of the principle according to which the composition of the selection board must be sufficiently stable. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of the principle according to which the composition of the selection board must be sufficiently stable.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging several manifest errors of assessment. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging several manifest errors of assessment.

---
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2013 - 0213 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM207AD

40 - 25 - 25, R 1 --- 8/23/10 40 - 25 - 25, R 2 --- 2/21/11 45 - 25 - 35, R 1 --- 8/23/10 45 - 25 - 35, R 2 --- 2/21/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
# Official Journal L 376/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 376 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4927 December 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 376

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4927 December 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 1920/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (recast) | 1 |
| | * | Directive 2006/113/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the quality required of shellfish waters (codified version) | 14 |
| | * | Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 concerning misleading and comparative advertising (codified version) (1) | 21 |
| | * | Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property (codified version) | 28 |
| | * | Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market | 36 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Regulation (EC) No 1920/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (recast)

1

*

Directive 2006/113/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the quality required of shellfish waters (codified version)

14

*

Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 concerning misleading and comparative advertising (codified version) (1)

21

*

Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property (codified version)

28

*

Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market

36

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
  /s/ Marshall O. LarsenName:
    Marshall O. LarsenTitle:
    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Scott E. KuechleName:
    Scott E. KuechleTitle:
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### WILLIAM R. THOMPSON and R. THOMPSON *vs.*JOHN THOMPSON.

Count upon an account stated necessary to meet evidence of a promise to pay a mere balance without proof of items.

Assumpsit. The narr. contained a count for goods sold and de-i livered; one for money lent and advanced; for money paid, laid out and expended; and for money had and received. There was no count on an account stated. The pleas were, non-assumpsit, payment, discount, and the act of limitation.

Plaintiffs proved a presentment of their bill to defendant in August, 1835, who said it had been of long standing, and he had been much favored by plaintiff’s indulgence. He then promised payment.

The account \yas drawn off thus:

“ John Thompson, to William R. Thompson & Co., Dr,

To balance of account, $125 36.”

*Bayard*.

In every case of assumpsit the party must show a consideration for the promise. This account contains no items, and does not show any consideration. I deny that a promise to pay a mere balance without any thing else appearing, is a valid promise, for there is no consideration proved. It is nudum pactum.

*Hamilton*.

The narr. is for goods sold and delivered. The account presented is for a balance due on account of such sale, and there is proof of a promise to pay that balance. Such promise is binding,

*Bayard*.

The account does not show that it was for goods sold and delivered.

*By the Court.*

The plea is non-assumpsit to counts for goods sold and delivered, money lent, money paid, and money had and received : and the proof is of a promise to pay the balance of an account stated without specification of items. Thus far there is no proof of a sale *203of goods, and the evidence of a promise is applicable only on the supposition that an account had been stated between the parties, and a promise by the defendant to pay the balance. But there is no count on an account stated.

*Hamilton,*for plaintiffs.

*J. A. Bayard,*for defendant.

We shall tell the jury, however, that if they have other evidence that this balance claimed was for goods sold and delivered, they may find for the plaintiffs; but on the present evidence we should have to direct a verdict for defendant.

The plaintiffs finally recovered.
No. 11006.

#### The Salem Company v. Tetlow.

Decided October 27, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Columbiana county.

*Messrs. Billingsley & Clark,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs, Anderson, McNab & Anderson; Mr. C. S. Speaker*and *Mr. G. T. Farrell,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Si-iatjck, Crew, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 32113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14774]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-1915-000]


Bowfin KeyCon Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding 
Bowfin KeyCon Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is July 23, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c7a796e7f7352505552596f494c4c534e487c5a594e5f125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a2e4e7f0e1edcccecbccc7f1d7d2d2cdd0d6e2c4c7d0c18cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: July 2, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14774 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2023024EN.01001701.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/17

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Napoli — Italy) — VB v Comune di Portici

(Case C-777/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Article 56 TFEU - Freedom to provide services - Road traffic - Registration and taxation of motor vehicles - Vehicle registered in a Member State - Driver residing in the Member State where the vehicle is registered and in another Member State - Legislation of a Member State prohibiting persons who have resided in that Member State for more than 60 days from driving in that Member State a vehicle registered in another country)

(2023/C 24/23)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Napoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: VB

Respondent: Comune di Portici

Operative part of the order

Article 49 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which prohibits a self-employed worker who has resided in that Member State for more than 60 days from driving in that Member State a vehicle registered in another Member State where the vehicle is neither intended to be used essentially in the first Member State on a permanent basis nor is, in fact, used in that manner.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 4.4.2022.

---
#### James A. CHIEVES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-42.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 10, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 74 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 74

    To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a 
   rollcall vote on passage of any measure making appropriations or 
                           providing revenue.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1993

 Mr. Hutchinson submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                       to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a 
   rollcall vote on passage of any measure making appropriations or 
                           providing revenue.

    Resolved, That rule XV of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
is amended by inserting at the end thereof the following new clause:
    ``7. The House shall not pass or adopt, as the case may be, any 
bill or joint resolution, or conference report thereon, making 
appropriations or providing revenue except by a rollcall vote, and the 
yeas and nays shall be considered as ordered.''.

                                 <all>
```
No. 11149.

#### McGuire *v.*Harmon, Receiver.

Decided January 26, 1909.

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Messrs. Strieker & Johnson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Harmon, Colston, Goldsmith & Hoadley,*for defendant in error.

*464Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Si-iauck and Price, JJ., concur.
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL FAN S

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Thursday, February 21 , 2013

Room 8E

- 089



## Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) seeks comments, information, and data from interested parties on the

Framework document s addressing potential energy conservation standards for commercial and industrial

fan s & blowers

.



## Agenda

9:00

– 9:15 am Welcome and Introductions , Opening Remarks

Doug Brookman

9:15

– 9:30 am Introduction and Rulemaking Process Overview

Charles Llenza

Summary of the rulemaking process.

9:30

– 10:30 am Authority, Definitions, and Regulatory Options

Charles Llenza

Summary presentation and discussion regarding statutory authority of

fan s /blowers for which DOE is conside ring standards and definitions

.

10:30 – 10: 45 am 

## Break

10:45

– 11:0 0 am Test Procedure and Efficiency Metrics

Alex Lekov

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the industry test procedures f or

commercial and industrial fan s /blowers and efficiency metrics

.

11: 00

– 11:45 am Market and Technology Assessment and Screening Analysis

Alex Lekov

Summary presentation and discu ssion regarding the proposed approach and

factors c onsidered for the market assessment and screen ing analysis

11:45 – 12 :30 am Engineering Analysis

Samuel Jasinski

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the proposed approach and

factors considered for the engineering analysis

12:30

– 1:30 pm 

## LunchU.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL FANS



## Agenda (cont.)

1: 30

– 2: 00 p m Markups Analysis; Energy Use Analysis

Dave Winiarski

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors

considered for the markups to determine equipment price analysis, energy use

analysis, and life

- cycle cost and payback period analysis.

2: 00

– 2: 30 pm Life- Cycle Costs and Payback Period Analysis

Alex Lekov

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors

considered for the markups to determine equipment price analysis, energy use

analysis, and life

- cycle cost and payback period analysis.

2:30

– 2:45 pm 

## Break

2:45 – 3: 00 pm Shipments Analysis and National Impact Analysis

Alex Lekov

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors

considered for the shipments analysis and n ational impact analysis

3:00

– 3:15 pm Preliminary Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Samuel Jasinski

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors

considered for the shipments analysis, national impact analysis, utility impact

analysis, and emissions impact analysis.

3:15

– 3:30 pm NOPR Analysis

Alex Lekov

Summary pres entation and discussion regarding the analysis that will be

conducted in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) stage

.

3: 30

– 4:00 pm Next Steps and Closing Remarks

Charles Llenza
EXHIBIT NO. 99



Supplemental Segment Information

|In thousands                     | Three Months Ended
July 31, |              
|-------------------------------- | --------------------------- | -------------
|                                 |                             | (Restated)   
|                                 | 2002                        | 2001         
|Orders Received:                 |                             |              
|Sign Making & Specialty Graphics | $  66,508                   | $  64,886    
|Apparel & Flexible Materials     | 38,660                      | 40,839       
|Ophthalmic Lens Processing       | 21,626                      | 20,437       
|                                 | $126,794                    | $126,162     
|                                 | =======                     | =======      
|                                 |                             |              
|                                 | July 31,2002                | April 30,2002
|Backlog:                         |                             |              
|Sign Making & Specialty Graphics | $  1,203                    | $   1,089    
|Apparel & Flexible Materials     | 27,266                      | 27,284       
|Ophthalmic Lens Processing       | 5,096                       | 4,276        
|                                 | $33,565                     | $ 32,649     
|                                 | ======                      | ======
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 56

Relating to the prosecution of Saddam Hussein and responsible members

of the Iraqi Government for war crimes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 1993

Mr. SOLOMON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Affairs

RESOLUTION

Relating to the prosecution of Saddam Hussein and

responsible members of the Iraqi Government for war crimes.

1 The House finds that—

2 (1) as ordered by Saddam Hussein, Iraq en3 gaged in unprovoked aggression in its conquest and

4 occupation of Kuwait;

5 (2) the Iraqi occupation force has treated Ku6 waiti citizens barbarously;

7 (3) Saddam Hussein used American and Euro8 pean civilians as ‘‘human shields’’ in an attempt to

9 protect strategic facilities throughout Iraq and has
2

HRES 56 IH

1 now directed that captured American and Allied

2 prisoners of war be used for the same purpose;

3 (4) Saddam Hussein ordered his military to

4 launch missile attacks against innocent civilians in

5 Israel and Saudi Arabia; and

6 (5) Former President Bush and President Clin7 ton have rightly warned Saddam Hussein and Iraqi

8 Government officials that they would be held respon9 sible for any abuses they have caused: Now, there10 fore, be it

11 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep12 resentatives to urge the President to request the United

13 Nations to establish a tribunal to charge Saddam Hussein

14 and other responsible Iraqi Government officials for war

15 crimes, acts of aggression, and crimes against humanity

16 they have committed.

Æ