alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                    EXHIBITS


EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Three months ended                    Nine months ended
                                                               September 30,                        September 30,
                                                      ------------------------------        ----------------------------
                                                          1996               1995              1996              1995
                                                      -----------        -----------        ----------        ----------
<S>                                                    <C>                <C>               <C>               <C>       
Weighted average common shares outstanding             12,885,000         11,244,565        12,879,708        10,414,855

Net effect of dilutive stock equivalents based
   on the treasury stock method using ending
   market price                                           772,660          1,089,246           885,314         1,091,808

Sale of common stock from the initial public
   offering assumed to repay amounts due to
   pre-IPO shareholders for undistributed S
   Corporation earnings                                        --            594,734                --           958,183
                                                      -----------        -----------        ----------        ----------
Total weighted average shares outstanding              13,657,660         12,928,545        13,765,022        12,464,846
                                                      ===========        ===========        ==========        ==========

Net income                                            $ 1,346,320                           $6,104,768
                                                      ===========                           ==========

Net income per share                                  $      0.10                           $     0.44
                                                      ===========                           ==========
                    
Pro forma data:
    Pro forma net income                                                 $ 2,435,853                          $ 6,657,971
                                                                         ===========                          ===========

    Pro forma net income per share                                       $      0.19                          $      0.53
                                                                         ===========                          ===========
                                  
</TABLE>


                                       15
EXHIBIT 32.1


           CERTIFICATION OF M. H. MCILVAIN, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT,
    PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18
                               U.S.C. SECTION 1350


The undersigned officer of American Resources Resources, Inc. hereby certifies
that (a) American Resource's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (b information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of American Resources.


Date: June 26, 2008                  /s/ M. H. MCILVAIN
                                       ----------------
                                       M. H. McIlvain
                                       Exec. Vice President, and Chief
                                       Financial Officer,
                                       American Resource Technologies, Inc.
<page>


					  EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund Limited Partnership (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I,
Jeffrey A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		March 31, 2006
#### In the Matter of Lavasia V., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[655 NYS2d 370]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Leah Marks, J.), entered December 11, 1995, which adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent, upon a finding that she committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted assault in the second degree and assault in the third degree, and placed her on probation for a period of one year, unanimously modified, on the law, only to the extent of vacating the finding regarding the crime of attempted assault in the second degree and, as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.

Inasmuch as respondent was charged with acts constituting the class E felony of attempted assault in the second degree, the presentment agency’s failure to present any evidence at the fact-finding hearing establishing the requisite element of an attempt to cause physical injury to the complainant by means of a dangerous instrument, to wit: a sneaker, requires the vacatur of the court’s finding to that effect. Concur—Williams, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification

I, Howard E. Ehler, certify that:

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GeoResources, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Howard E. Ehler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Howard E. EhlerHoward E. EhlerChief Financial OfficerMay 13, 2008
No. 00-998.

#### Rapoport et al. *v.*State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2021391EN.01001501.xml

| 27.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 391/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 391/15

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court (Ireland) made on 3 August 2021 — Criminal proceedings against SN and SD. Other parties: Governor of Cloverhill Prison, Ireland, Attorney General, Governor of Mountjoy prison

(Case C-479/21)

(2021/C 391/22)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Supreme Court

Criminal proceedings against

SN and SD

Questions referred

| 1. | Can the provisions of the Withdrawal Agreement, which provide for the continuance of the EAW (1) regime in respect of the United Kingdom, during the transition period provided for in that agreement, be considered binding on Ireland having regard to its significant AFSJ (2) content; and |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can the provisions of the Withdrawal Agreement, which provide for the continuance of the EAW (1) regime in respect of the United Kingdom, during the transition period provided for in that agreement, be considered binding on Ireland having regard to its significant AFSJ (2) content; and

| 2. | Can the provisions of the Agreement on Trade and Cooperation which provide for the continuance of the EAW regime in respect of the United Kingdom after the relevant transition period, be considered binding on Ireland having regard to its significant AFSJ content? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Can the provisions of the Agreement on Trade and Cooperation which provide for the continuance of the EAW regime in respect of the United Kingdom after the relevant transition period, be considered binding on Ireland having regard to its significant AFSJ content?

---

(1)  European Arrest Warrant.

(2)  Area of freedom security and justice.

---
EXHIBIT10.1

 

 

 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT

between
<PAGE>   1

                                                               Exhibit 23.1(a)



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-99070) pertaining to the Chicago Miniature Lamp, Inc. 1995
Incentive and Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan of our report dated February 11,
2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
SLI, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
January 2, 2000.



Ernst & Young LLP

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 15, 2000
EXHIBIT 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-110460, 333-115724, 333-15933, 333-24187 and 333-28415) of Magnetek, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses, and in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-58929, 333-04021, 333-17889, 333-45935, 333-45939, 333-90645, 333-90647, 333-75418, 333-129362 and 333-146898) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1989 Incentive Stock Compensation Plan of Magnetek, Inc., Magnetek, Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, Magnetek, Inc. Deferral Investment Plan, Magnetek, Inc. 1997 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, Magnetek, Inc. Amended and Restated Director Compensation and Deferral Investment Plan, 1999 Stock Incentive Plan of Magnetek, Inc., 2000 Employee Stock Plan of Magnetek, Inc., Magnetek, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 1999 Stock Incentive Plan of Magnetek, Inc., 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of Magnetek, Inc. and Executive Employment Agreement for Thomas G. Boren, and the Amended and Restated Director and Officer Compensation and Deferral Investment Plan, of our report dated August 31, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Magnetek, Inc. listed in Item 15(a).
















/s/ Ernst & Young LLPMilwaukee, Wisconsin





Date: August 31, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 556 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 556

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 30, 1994.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 6) to extend for six 
years the authorizations of appropriations for the programs under the Elementary 
and Secondary Education Act of 1965, and for certain other purposes. All points 
of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 21, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Navistar 

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on April 11, 2011 between Navistar and EPA and 

included the following individuals:

Navistar: John Zagone, Graham Weller, Phillip Gronberg, Ning Lei, and David Piech

EPA: Byron Bunker, Houshun Zhang, Allen Duncan, Matt Brusster, and Angela Cullen

The discussion focused on technology paths to reduce GHG emissions and fuel consumption 

from heavy-duty engines, including the following:

 Turbomachinery, including variable geometry and dual stage with double turbines and 

compressors

 Exhaust Gas NOx Reduction system

 Air management

 Combustion improvement through calibration, higher injection pressure, and improved 

aftertreatment control

 Short term parasitic reductions through low viscosity lubricants and crank shaft seal 

improvements 

 Long term improvements through reductions in rotating mass, piston ring/cylinder liner 

friction, and variable flow pumps

The individuals also discussed the engine development process and the impact of OBD 

calibration on the timing, which can add 6 to 9 months to the development process. A typical 

engine development process can take between 3 and 4.75 years.
No. 00-1005.

#### Osijo *v.*Weiner et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
#### HAMPTON UTILITIES COMPANY, Inc., etc., Petitioner, v. HAMPTON HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Inc., etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 41658.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 23, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed. 252 So.2d 286.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
# C_2023094EN.01000701.xml

| 13.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Consejo General de Colegios Oficiales de Farmacéuticos de España (CGCOF) v Administracíon General del Estado

(Case C-469/21, (1) CGCOF)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Medicinal products for human use - Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 - Repositories system containing information on safety features - Creation of an interface integrated into the national repository and managed by the public authorities - Obligation to use a specific application for certain medicinal products)

(2023/C 94/06)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Consejo General de Colegios Oficiales de Farmacéuticos de España (CGCOF)

Defendant: Administracíon General del Estado

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 of 2 October 2015 supplementing Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council by laying down detailed rules for the safety features appearing on the packaging of medicinal products for human use, in particular Articles 25, 31, 32, 35, 36 and 44 thereof,
  must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation providing for the creation of an interface, as a tool for accessing the national repository, that is owned and managed by the public authorities. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 of 2 October 2015 supplementing Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council by laying down detailed rules for the safety features appearing on the packaging of medicinal products for human use, in particular Articles 25, 31, 32, 35, 36 and 44 thereof,

must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation providing for the creation of an interface, as a tool for accessing the national repository, that is owned and managed by the public authorities.

| 2. | Delegated Regulation 2016/161, in particular Articles 25, 31, 32, 35, 36 and 44 thereof,
  must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which (i) requires pharmacies to use an interface owned and managed by the public authorities when they supply medicinal products financed by the national health system and (ii) requires the entity managing the national repository to integrate that interface into the national repository. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Delegated Regulation 2016/161, in particular Articles 25, 31, 32, 35, 36 and 44 thereof,

must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which (i) requires pharmacies to use an interface owned and managed by the public authorities when they supply medicinal products financed by the national health system and (ii) requires the entity managing the national repository to integrate that interface into the national repository.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 17.1.2022.

---
July 19, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building ground floor

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition for Extension of Exemption: Exemption No. 6002J, FAA Docket No. 

2002-12804

Dear Sir or Madam:

On December 16, 1994, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) granted Exemption 

No. 6002 to Helicopter Association International (HAI) and the Association of Air 

Medical Services (AAMS) (hereinafter, the “Petitioners”). This exemption, from 

§43.3(a) of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR), was granted “to the extent necessary

to allow pilots employed by member operators of the petitioners, not permitted under 

§43.3(g) to perform preventative maintenance, to remove and reinstall LOX [Liquid 

Oxygen System] containers in their aircraft, after receiving and documenting appropriate 

training in this task by a properly certificated airframe mechanic,” subject to certain 

conditions and limitations stated therein. 

Since the first Exemption No. 6002 was granted, it has been extended every two years. 

The latest extension, Exemption No. 6002J will expire, by its own terms, on January 31, 

2016.

The conditions and circumstances pursuant to which Exemption No. 6002 was originally 

granted remain unchanged. Experience with Exemption No. 6002 demonstrates that the 

public interest is served and a level of safety equivalent to regulation is maintained when 

properly trained air medical service pilots are permitted to remove and reinstall LOX 

containers in their aircraft. Pursuant to FAR §11.87, good cause exists to waive 

publication of this petition for extension of exemption in the Federal Register, because 

the extension, if granted, would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this 

petition would be a detriment to the Petitioners and the public.
Exemption No. 6002 remains vital to the public interest despite the addition to the federal 

aviation regulations of subsection 14 CFR § 43.3(i), which authorizes properly trained 

pilots of certain aircraft operated pursuant to 14 CFR part 135 to remove and reinstall

“approved cabin-mounted medical oxygen bottles” only “when no tools are required.” 

Exemption 6002 authorizes trained air medical aircraft pilots “to remove and reinstall 

LOX containers in their aircraft” using simple hand tools when “no special tools are 

required to perform the container exchange,” subject to the conditions stated therein. 

Therefore, HAI and AAMS petition the Administrator to extend Exemption No. 6002 for 

an additional two-year term, or for such longer term as the Administrator may deem 

appropriate. The Petitioners further ask the Administrator to find good cause exists to 

waive publication. 

Sincerely,

Matthew S. Zuccaro

President

cc: Mr. Rick Sherlock, CEO, AAMS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Management and Budget

# AGENCY:

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget.

# ACTION:

Extension of comment period.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within the Office of Management and Budget is extending the comment period for its Maritime Deregulatory request for information (RFI), by 45 days until August 30, 2018. Please note, OIRA intends to make all submissions publicly available on                         *www.regulations.gov.*

# DATES:

Written comments should be submitted by August 30, 2018. Late comments will be considered to the extent possible.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments, identified by “Maritime Regulatory Reform RFI,” by any of the following methods: Federal Rulemaking Portal:                         *http://www.regulations.gov.*                         Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Email:                         *OMB.DeregulatoryRFI@OMB.eop.gov.*                         Include “Maritime Regulatory Reform RFI” in the subject line of the message.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This extension of comment period pertains to the RFI published in 83 FR 22993 pertaining to maritime regulatory reform, docket number 2018-10539. For more information, please see                     *https://www.regulations.gov/​docket?​D=​OMB-2018-0002.*

Neomi Rao,

Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2018-14958 Filed 7-12-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 30, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2342 Lower Tribunal No. F01-34236

________________ 

### Daniel Deleon, Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Joseph Perkins, Judge. Daniel Deleon, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMAS, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.