Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2020
                              Sanique D. Clarke, DAB CR5544 (2020)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Sanique D. Clarke, DAB CR5544 (2020)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Sanique D. Clarke,
	(O.I. File No. H-19-40499-9),
	Petitioner,
v.
The Inspector General.
Docket No. C-19-1144Decision No. CR5544February 26, 2020

        
              
    

      DECISION
Petitioner, Sanique D. Clarke, was a certified nursing aide who worked at a nursing home in Queens County, New York.  She was charged with endangering the welfare of an incompetent or physically disabled person (a felony) and willful violation of health laws (a misdemeanor).  She ultimately pled guilty to one count of disorderly conduct.  Based on her conviction, the Inspector General (IG) has excluded Petitioner for five years from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs, as authorized by section 1128(a)(2) of the Social Security Act (Act).  Petitioner appeals the exclusion.
For the reasons discussed below, I find that the IG properly excluded Petitioner Clarke and that the statute mandates a minimum five-year exclusion.
Background
In a letter dated July 31, 2019, the IG notified Petitioner that she was excluded from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs for a period of five years because she had been convicted of a criminal offense related to the neglect or
Page 2
abuse of patients in connection with the delivery of a health care item or service.  The letter explained that section 1128(a)(2) of the Act authorizes the exclusion.  IG Ex. 1.
Petitioner timely requested review.
Each party submitted a written argument (IG Br.; P. Br.).  The IG submitted four proposed exhibits (IG Exs. 1-4).  With her brief, Petitioner submitted one exhibit (P. Ex. 1). In the absence of any objections, I admit into evidence IG Exs. 1-4 and P. Ex. 1.1
The parties agree that an in-person hearing is not necessary.  IG Br. at 9; P. Br. at 5.
Discussion
***Petitioner must be excluded from program participation for a minimum of five years because she was convicted of a criminal offense related to the neglect or abuse of a patient in connection with the delivery of a health care item or service.  Act §*** ***1128(a)(2 ).***2
Under section 1128(a)(2) of the Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services must exclude an individual who has been convicted, under federal or state law, of “a criminal offense related to neglect or abuse of patients, in connection with the delivery of a health care item or service.”  42 C.F.R. § 1001.101(b).  The “delivery of a health care item or service” includes providing any item or service to an individual to meet his or her physical, mental, or emotional needs or well-being, whether or not it is reimbursed by Medicare, Medicaid, or any federal health care program.  *Id*.
Here, Petitioner Clarke was working as a certified nursing aide at a nursing home located in Queens, New York.  IG Ex. 2 at 4; IG Ex. 3.  On the night of April 22, 2016, she was assigned to care for a seriously impaired resident.  The resident’s care plan required a two-person assist and mechanical lift in order to transfer or shower the resident.  Disregarding the care plan, Petitioner attempted to transfer and shower the resident without assistance; the resident fell and fractured a thigh bone.  IG Ex. 2 at 4; IG Ex. 3; P. Ex. 1 at 3.
Page 3
In a felony complaint dated February 7, 2017, Petitioner was charged with:
one felony count of endangering the welfare of an incompetent or physically disabled person, in violation of section 260.25 of the New York Penal Code; and
	one misdemeanor count of willful violation of health laws, in violation of sections 12-(b)2 and 2803-d(7) of the New York Public Health Law.IG Ex. 3; P. Ex. 1 at 3.
On September 18, 2017, Petitioner pled guilty to disorderly conduct, a violation of the New York Penal Code.  New York Penal Law § 240.20; IG Ex. 4; P. Ex. 1 at 3.  Her plea was conditioned on:  1) her cooperating with the state’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit to make a video detailing the allegations against her, apparently for the state agency’s use in nursing home training; and 2) her not working for any entity enrolled in a government-funded healthcare program, including Medicare and Medicaid; and her not enrolling in any of these programs.  IG Ex. 2 at 1, 3; P. Ex. 1 at 4.  She was ordered to pay surcharge fees of $95 and $25.  So long as she met the conditions of her plea agreement, the charges would be dismissed after a year.  IG Ex. 4.  However, failing to meet the conditions would subject her to a maximum of 15 days’ imprisonment.  IG Ex. 2 at 1.
The court accepted her guilty plea.  IG Ex. 4.
Petitioner nevertheless argues that she was not convicted of a crime within the meaning of section 1128(a)(2) because disorderly conduct is a “violation” but not a “crime.”  In fact, the violation is defined in the New York penal code, and it carries a potential jail term (albeit a relatively short one).  When she entered her plea agreement, Petitioner acknowledged that she was entitled to the same protections as any criminal defendant (right to counsel; right to a speedy trial by judge or jury; right to confront the witnesses against her; right to remain silent; appeal rights).  IG Ex. 2.  Because a violation carries with it all of the indicia of any criminal charge, my colleagues have unfailingly agreed that the IG reasonably considers the offense a “criminal offense” under section 1128.  *See Esohe Agbonkpolor*, DAB CR5527 (2020); *Funmilola Mary Taiwo*, DAB No. CR5498 (2019); *Crystal Courtney-Wade*, DAB CR5256 (2019); *Yamilet Martinez*, DAB CR5238 at 2-3 (2019); *Marie J. Jeanty*, DAB CR4970 at 5 (2017); *Tara Lyn Justin*, DAB CR4689 (2016).
Petitioner also argues that her conviction was ultimately vacated and characterizes the proceeding as a “deferred prosecution” rather than a “deferred adjudication.”  The statute and regulations provide that a person is “convicted” when “a judgment of conviction has been entered” regardless of whether that judgment has been (or could be) expunged or otherwise removed.  Act § 1128(i)(1); 42 C.F.R. § 1001.2.  Here, Petitioner entered into a plea agreement and the court entered judgment against her.  IG Exs. 2, 4.  She was
Page 4
required to pay a fine and meet other conditions.  Only after all the conditions were satisfied was she able to have her conviction vacated.  Had she violated its terms, she’d have been subject to “any legal sentence” the court chose to impose, without further prosecution.  IG Ex. 2 at 1.  She was thus convicted and her conviction was subsequently vacated.
For purposes of section 1128, a vacated conviction is nevertheless a conviction.  Individuals who participate in “deferred adjudication or other program or arrangement where judgment of conviction has been withheld” are also “convicted” within the meaning of the statute.  Act § 1128(i)(4); 42 C.F.R. § 1001.2.  The Departmental Appeals Board characterizes as “well established” the principle that a “conviction” includes “diverted, deferred and expunged convictions regardless of whether state law treats such actions as a conviction.”  *Henry L. Gupton*, DAB No. 2058 at 8 (2007), *aff’d sub nom. Gupton v. Leavitt*, 575 F. Supp. 2d 874 (E.D. Tenn. 2008).
Petitioner also suggests that her crime was not related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare, Medicaid, or any federal healthcare program.  P. Ex. 1 at 8-9; P. Br. at 4-5.
Although the disorderly conduct statute does not mention patient neglect or abuse, the facts underlying Petitioner’s conviction establish that it was related to neglect.  The Board has long rejected efforts to limit section 1128 review to the bare elements of the offense on which the individual was convicted.  *See Narendra M. Patel, M.D.* DAB No. 1736 at 7 (2000), *aff’d sub nom. Patel v. Thompson*, 319 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2003) (“We thus see nothing in section 1128(a)(2) that requires that the necessary element of the criminal offense must mirror the elements of the exclusion authority, nor that all statutory elements required for an exclusion must be contained in the findings or record of the state criminal court.”);*Timothy Wayne Hensley*, DAB No. 2044 (2006); *Scott D. Augustine*, DAB No. 2043 (2006); *Lyle Kai, R. Ph*., DAB No. 1979 at 5 (2005), *aff’d sub nom. Kai v. Leavitt*, No. 05-00514 BMK (D. Haw. July 17, 2006) (holding that an offense is “related to” the delivery of a healthcare item or service, if there is “a nexus or common-sense connection” between the conduct giving rise to the offense and the delivery of a healthcare item or service); *Berton Siegel, D.O.*, DAB No 1467 at 5 (1994); *Carolyn Westin*, DAB No. 1381 (1993), *aff’d sub nom.* *Westin v. Shalala*, 845 F. Supp. 1446 (D. Kan. 1994).
At the time she entered her guilty plea, Petitioner Clarke admitted that, in caring for a seriously disabled nursing home resident, she disregarded his care plan and attempted to shower him without the assistance of a second caregiver and without using the required lift.  As a result, he fell to the floor and fractured his thigh bone.  IG Ex. 2 at 4.  Her admissions remove all doubt that her disorderly conduct conviction stemmed from her neglecting a seriously impaired nursing home patient.
Page 5
For these reasons, Petitioner Clarke was “convicted” within the meaning of section 1128(a)(2) and she is subject to exclusion.  *See Robert C. Hartnett*, DAB No. 2740 (2016).
Petitioner also raises some Constitutional claims, which I have no authority to review.  P. Br. at 5-7; *Donna Rogers*, DAB No. 2381 at 5 (2011); *Susan Malady*, DAB No. 1816 (2001); *see* 42 C.F.R. § 1005.4(c)(1).
Finally, an exclusion brought under section 1128(a)(2) must be for a minimum period of five years.  Act § 1128(c)(3)(B); 42 C.F.R. §§ 1001.102(a), 1001.2007(a)(2).
Conclusion
For these reasons, I conclude that the IG properly excluded Petitioner from participating in Medicare, Medicaid and all federal health care programs, and I sustain the five-year exclusion.


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. P. Ex. 1 consists of a second written argument with six attachments, marked Exhibits A through F (P. Ex. A-F). back to note 1
                      2. I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law. back to note 2 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back