Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2020
                              Mariam Hakopyan, DAB CR5526 (2020)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Mariam Hakopyan, DAB CR5526 (2020)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Mariam Hakopyan,
	(OI File No. H-19-40935-9),
	Petitioner,
v.
The Inspector General,
	Respondent.
Docket No. C-19-1117Decision No. CR5526February 5, 2020

        
              
    

      DECISION
I sustain the determination of the Inspector General (IG) to exclude Petitioner, Mariam Hakopyan, from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and other federally funded health care programs for a minimum period of five years.
I. Background
The IG filed a brief (IG brief), a reply brief (IG reply), plus four proposed exhibits that are identified as IG Ex. 1-IG Ex. 4. Petitioner filed a brief (Petitioner’s brief), a reply to the IG reply (Petitioner’s reply), and two proposed exhibits that are labeled as “Exhibit A” and “Exhibit B.” I receive the parties’ proposed exhibits into the record.
II. Issues, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
**A.   Issue**
The issue is whether Petitioner was convicted of a criminal offense within the meaning of section 1128(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (Act).
**Page 2**
**B.   Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law**
There are no disputed facts.  Petitioner pled nolo contendere in a California State court to one count of presenting false Medi-Cal claims, a crime under California law.  IG Ex. 4; *see* IG Ex. 2.  I take notice that Medi-Cal is California’s state Medicaid program.  The court in which she entered her plea accepted it.  IG Ex. 4.
Section 1128(a)(1) of the Act mandates the exclusion of any individual who is convicted of a criminal offense relating to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or a State Medicaid program.  A conviction for presenting a false Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement claim plainly falls within the ambit of section 1128(a)(1).  A false Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement claim is an attempted theft from one of these programs and, for that reason, relates directly to Medicare or Medicaid items or services.
An individual is “convicted” of a crime if that person offers either a plea of guilty or nolo contendere that a court accepts or where it enters a judgment of conviction against that individual.  Act § 1128(i)(1), (3); 42 C.F.R. § 1001.2.
Here, the undisputed facts plainly establish a basis for Petitioner’s exclusion pursuant to section 1128(a)(1).  She was convicted of a crime, having pled nolo contendere to the charge, and the court having accepted that plea.  The crime related to the delivery of a Medicaid item or service, consisting of filing a false claim for Medi-Cal reimbursement, a crime under California State law.
Petitioner advances several arguments to challenge the IG’s determination to exclude her.  I find these arguments to be without merit.
First and foremost, Petitioner argues that she was not “convicted” of a crime.  She asserts that her plea was conditional in the sense that she was allowed to withdraw it with court approval.  IG Ex. 3.  Petitioner avers that she successfully completed the terms of her sentence and withdrew her plea.  That, according to Petitioner, erased her conviction and eliminated any basis for the IG to exclude her.  Petitioner’s brief at 2, 4; *see* P. Ex. B.
Petitioner remains “convicted” of a crime for purposes of section 1128(a)(1) even though she subsequently withdrew her nolo contendere plea.  Subsequent expungement of a plea does not erase a conviction as is defined by section 1128(i) of the Act.  Act § 1128(i)(1). The law is explicit in stating that expungement of a conviction under State law does not eliminate a basis for exclusion.  *Id.*  Once a conviction is entered in a State court, it is the federal definition of “convicted” that determines whether an exclusion must be imposed.  *Travers v. Shalala*, 20 F.3d 993 (9th Cir. 1994).
**Page 3**
Petitioner argues that, even if she was convicted of a crime, it was not a crime that falls within the definition of section 1128(a)(1) of the Act. Petitioner’s brief at 6; Petitioner’s reply at 2. She asserts that she was a program director at a rehabilitation facility and acted as an administrator of records and “did not represent or participate in the delivery of services or preparation of billing for services.” Petitioner’s reply at 2. According to Petitioner, that facility did not provide medical care to patients. Therefore, she contends, her conviction was unrelated to the delivery of a Medicaid item or service. Petitioner’s brief at 6; Petitioner’s reply at 2.
However, the fact is that Petitioner was convicted explicitly of presenting a false Medicaid claim, whatever were the types of services that her employer may have provided. IG Ex. 4; *see* IG Ex. 2. The authority to exclude Petitioner springs directly from that conviction. Indeed, at this juncture, the conviction is definitive. It is explicit – Petitioner was convicted of presenting a false Medicaid claim. That conviction, in and of itself, triggers the mandatory exclusion requirement of section 1128(a)(1).
Petitioner argues that she was denied due process because the IG did not exclude her immediately upon her conviction but did so only about a year and one-half after Petitioner entered her plea of nolo contendere. I do not have authority to address this argument. There is nothing in the Act nor in the implementing regulations that permits me to review the timing of the IG’s exclusion determination where the IG has a legal basis to exclude. *See* Act § 1128; 42 C.F.R. Part 1001; *James W. Marshall, Jr., D.O*., DAB No. 2796 (2017), *summarily aff’g James W. Marshall, Jr., D.O*., ALJ Ruling No. 2017-9 (2017); *Kris Durschmidt*, DAB No. 2345 at 3 (2010).
Petitioner contends additionally that the IG should have considered excluding her under the permissive exclusion provisions of section 1128(b)(1) of the Act, rather than pursuant to the mandatory exclusion requirement of section 1128(a)(1). Section 1128(b)(1) permits the IG to exclude, for among other things, an individual who is convicted of a misdemeanor relating to fraud, theft, embezzlement, breach of fiduciary responsibility, or other financial misconduct in connection with the delivery of a health care item or service. Act § 1128(b)(1)(A)(i).
Petitioner’s argument notwithstanding, section 1128(b)(1) does not carve out exceptions to section 1128(a)(1) of the Act. Section 1128(a)(1) explicitly defines what falls within its reach, and Petitioner’s conviction falls squarely within the reach of that section. Section 1128(b)(1) addresses those convictions that are not explicitly covered by section 1128(a)(1), including misdemeanor convictions of crimes related to health care items or services *other than* Medicare or Medicaid items or services.
**Page 4**
Finally, I note that the length of Petitioner’s exclusion – at least five years – is not at issue in this case. The Act mandates an exclusion of at least five years of any individual who is convicted of a section 1128(a)(1) crime. Act § 1128(c)(3)(B).
  
          /s/
        Steven T. Kessel

                      Administrative Law Judge Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back