Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2020
                              Monica Ferguson, DAB CR5585 (2020)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Monica Ferguson, DAB CR5585 (2020)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Monica Ferguson,
	(OI File No. H-18-42349-9),
	Petitioner,
v.
The Inspector General.
Docket No. C-20-19Decision No. CR5585April 10, 2020

        
              
    

      DECISION
Petitioner, Monica Ferguson, was a licensed nurse practitioner, working in Oregon.  Citing a long list of offenses, including professional and fiscal improprieties, the Oregon Department of Human Services, Aging and People with Disabilities (state agency) terminated her Medicaid provider enrollment.  Thereafter, as authorized by section 1128(b)(5) of the Social Security Act (Act), the Inspector General (IG) excluded her from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs, at least until the state agency reinstates her program participation.  Petitioner appeals the IG exclusion.
For the reasons discussed below, I sustain the IG’s determination.
Background
In a letter dated August 30, 2019, the IG advised Petitioner Ferguson that, because the Oregon state agency suspended, excluded, or otherwise sanctioned her “for reasons bearing on [her] professional competence, professional performance or financial integrity,” the IG was excluding her from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs.  Her exclusion would remain in effect until the state agency
Page 2
reinstated her participation in the Medicaid program.  The letter explained that section 1128(b)(5) of the Act authorizes the exclusion.  IG Ex. 2.
Petitioner timely requested review.
The parties have submitted written arguments.  (IG Br.; P. Br.).  With her brief, the IG submitted four exhibits (IG Exs. 1-4).  With her brief, Petitioner submitted 14 exhibits (P. Exs. 1-10 and P. Exs. 12-15).  The IG also submitted a reply brief.  In the absence of any objections, I admit into evidence IG Exs. 1-4 and P. Exs. 1-10 and 12-15.
I instructed the parties to indicate in their briefs whether an in-person hearing would be necessary and, if so, to explain why, identify any proposed witness, and “submit witness testimony in the form of an affidavit or sworn declaration.”  Order and Schedule for Filing Briefs and Documentary Evidence at 4 (¶ 7) (November 1, 2019); *see* attached Informal Brief of Petitioner at 2-3 (¶ II); 42 C.F.R. § 1005.16(b) (authorizing the ALJ to admit testimony in the form of a written statement).
The IG indicates that an in-person hearing is not necessary.  IG Br. at 6.  Petitioner, however, asserts that an in-person hearing “could be helpful,” but she identifies no specific witnesses and offers no written declarations.  P. Br. at 43-44.  Instead, she attacks the integrity of the state administrative process and describes her (unnamed) potential witnesses as character witnesses:  they “would speak of [her] performance, competence, character as a [n]urse practitioner, [n]urse, person, mother, daughter, friend or colleagues.”  P. Br. at 44.  I must exclude evidence that is irrelevant or immaterial.  42 C.F.R. § 1005.17(c).  As the following discussion explains, this testimony would be irrelevant because Petitioner may not use these proceedings to attack collaterally the state administrative process.  Nor may I alter the exclusion on the grounds that she is a “good person” or otherwise well thought of in her professional life.
I therefore conclude that an in-person hearing would serve no purpose, and this case may be decided based on the written record.
Discussion
***Because a state regulatory authority terminated Petitioner Ferguson’s participation in a state medical assistance program for reasons bearing on her professional competence, professional performance or financial integrity, the IG appropriately excluded her from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal health care programs.***1
Page 3
The Act authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services to exclude from program participation an individual who has been suspended, excluded, or otherwise sanctioned under a state health care program for reasons bearing on her professional competence, professional performance, or financial integrity.  Act § 1128(b)(5); 42 C.F.R. § 1001.601(a)(ii).
Here, Petitioner Ferguson was a nurse practitioner, licensed in the State of Oregon, who worked as a Medicaid-enrolled homecare worker.  Citing violations of program rules, the state agency terminated her Medicaid enrollment.  IG Ex. 3.  She appealed, and, in a decision issued September 13, 2018, a state administrative law judge affirmed the termination, based on Petitioner’s fiscal improprieties (repeated overbilling and double billing) and her failing to report her arrest for a potentially disqualifying crime (driving under the influence of intoxicants – opioids and amphetamines).  IG Ex. 4.
Thus the Oregon state agency suspended, excluded, or otherwise sanctioned Petitioner from a state health care program for reasons bearing on her financial integrity as well as her professional competence or performance.  *See Richard R. Jimenez*, DAB No, 2986 (2020) (characterizing as bearing on his professional competence or performance a nursing assistant’s failing to comply with his duty to report a shoplifting arrest and conviction).
Petitioner attacks the state agency’s investigation and final decision, arguing that the state ALJ erred in determining that she had committed financial improprieties.  P. Br. at 12, 18.  Federal regulations preclude such a collateral attack:
When the exclusion is based on the existence of a . . . civil judgment  . . . by another Government agency, or any other prior determination where the facts were adjudicated and a final decision was made, the basis for the underlying . . . determination is not reviewable and the individual or entity may not collaterally attack it, either on substantive or procedural grounds in this appeal.
42 C.F.R. § 1001.2007(d); *Marvin L. Gibbs, Jr., M.D.*, DAB No. 2279 at 8-10 (2009); *Roy Cosby Stark*, DAB No. 1746 (2000).
Petitioner also submits letters from friends and colleagues attesting to her good character.  P. Ex. 2.  But these arguments do not alter the undisputed facts underlying her termination from the state Medicaid program.  My authority is limited by the regulations, and I may not review the IG’s decision to exclude an individual “on the ground that she is a good person or well-thought-of in the profession . . . .”  *Donna Rogers*, DAB No. 2381 at 6 (2011).
Page 4
Petitioner also argues that, in imposing an exclusion, the IG violated her due process and other rights.  I have no authority to review Petitioner’s constitutional challenges.  *Donna Rogers*, DAB No. 2381 at 5 (2011); *Susan Malady*, DAB No. 1816 (2001); *see also* 42 C.F.R. § 1005.4(c)(1).
Finally, the statute and regulation also require that Petitioner’s period of exclusion “shall not be less than the period during which . . . the individual . . . is excluded or suspended from a Federal or State health care program.”  Act § 1128(c)(3)(E); 42 C.F.R. § 1001.601(b)(1).
Conclusion
Because she was excluded from the state Medicaid program for reasons bearing on her professional competence, professional performance, and financial integrity, the IG is authorized to exclude Petitioner Ferguson from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal health care programs for as long as the state Medicaid exclusion continues.


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law. back to note 1 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back