alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-44012, 33-44599,
33-64032, 333-2676, 333-70057 and 333-57130) pertaining to the Stock Option Plan and the Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan of our report dated
April 14, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Fischer Imaging Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2003.



Denver,
Colorado
April 14, 2004

---

QuickLinks
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 2 1

- 784 V

UNPUBLISHED

SARAH HOLBROOK

- LIPSCOMB on behalf of her minor child, M.L.,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: October 1 9 , 2021

Withdrawal of petition ; Order concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

On January 22, 2021

, Sarah Holbrook

- Lipscomb filed a petition for compensation

on behalf of her minor child, M.L., under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 1 0 through 34

. 2 Petitioner allege d that M.L. suffered injuries after receiving a human papillomavirus vaccination on January 23, 2018. ECF

no. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “ that the petitioner may withdraw the petition

under section 300aa

— 21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section

300aa

— 21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master. ” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 12 (g ). O n October 1 9 , 2021

, Petitioner timely filed a notice to withdraw

the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. § 300aa

— 21(b).

In light of Petitioner ’ s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. §

300aa

— 21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner ’ s request to withdraw the petition is GRANTED . Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment “on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office.

IT IS S O ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this

case

, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755.
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


           (Not filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Larry C. Oldham, the
President and Chief Executive Officer of Parallel Petroleum Corporation
("Parallel"), hereby certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Parallel
for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the periodic reporting
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
information contained in that Form 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Parallel.

Dated: March 22, 2004



                                     /s/ Larry C. Oldham
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Larry C. Oldham,
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Parallel Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Parallel
Petroleum Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.




<PAGE>





                                                                   Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION



           (Not filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Steven D. Foster, the Chief
Financial Officer of Parallel Petroleum Corporation ("Parallel"), hereby
certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Parallel for the year ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the periodic reporting requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in
that Form 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Parallel.



Dated: March 22, 2004



                                     /s/ Steven D. Foster
                                    -------------------------------
                                    Steven D. Foster,
                                    Chief Financial Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Parallel Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Parallel
Petroleum Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### Lee Ward LeBOEUF v. AETNA LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY.

No. 11513.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Oct. 17, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 21, 1977.

Laurence E. Best, Houma, for plaintiff and appellee.

Robert L. Morris, Houma, for defendant and appellant.

Before BLANCHE, COVINGTON and CHIASSON, JJ.

BLANCHE, Judge.

Aetna Life Insurance Company, defendant-appellant, appeals from a judgment by the trial court ordering it to pay the plaintiff-appellee back payments due him and commence the monthly payments under a group long-term disability plan carried by the plaintiff-appellee’s employer.

The case turns upon the facts and expert opinion collected in four depositions and the testimony of two witnesses before the trial court as applied to the definitions of “reasonable occupation” and “total disability” as defined in the group policy.

The policy definitions are:

> “(b) ‘Reasonable occupation’, as to any employee, means any gainful activity for which the employee is, or may reasonably become, fitted by education, training, or experience, but shall not mean any such activity if it is in connection with an approved rehabilitation program.

> “(c) ‘Total disability’ or ‘totally disabled’ means, during the first twenty-four months of any period of disability, that the employee is unable, solely because of disease or injury, to work at his own occupation; and, thereafter during the continuance of such period of disability, that the employee is unable, solely because of disease or injury, to work at any reasonable occupation.” (Exhibit D-4, p. 6)

The question before the trial court was whether the plaintiff-appellee’s back condition was so disabling, in fact, as to meet the test under the “reasonable occupation” and “total disability” definitions. The answer to this question depends largely on the terms of the foregoing policy provisions defining the disability and the nature of plaintiff’s disability.

*1267The evidence shows that the plaintiffs disability is of such a nature and degree that he cannot meet the reasonable demands of an employer who would otherwise consider the plaintiff as a prospective employee. The witnesses stated that because of his age, his necessity for frequent rest periods and other factors he is unemployable and cannot engage in any gainful occupation for which he is fitted by education, training and experience. Thus, we can only conclude that by the testimony we have reviewed, the plaintiff has proved his claim of total disability.

Absent a showing in the record of manifest error by the trier of fact, this Court will affirm the trial court’s factual determination.

The defendant-appellant is to pay all costs of this appeal.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. 1350

Each of the undersigned, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Gerber Scientific, Inc., hereby certifies that, on the date hereof:

(i)	The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gerber Scientific, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)	Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gerber Scientific, Inc.



Date:  March 7, 2008
/s/ Marc T. GilesMarc T. Giles
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2022222EN.01000501.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/5

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘Konservinvest’ OOD v ‘Bulkons Parvomay’ OOD

(Case C-35/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs - Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Designations of Origin and Geographical indications - Article 9 - Transitional national protection - Geographical indication designating an agricultural product, registered under the legislation of a Member State and protected at national level)

(2022/C 222/06)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘Konservinvest’ OOD

Defendant:‘Bulkons Parvomay’ OOD

Operative part of the order

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State providing for a national system for the registration and protection of qualified geographical designations relating to agricultural products and foodstuffs falling within the scope of that regulation, which is intended to apply only to disputes relating to infringements of the rights arising from those designations between traders from that Member State which produce, in that Member State, the products for which those designations have been registered under that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 22.3.2021.

---
# C_2021263EN.01000602.xml

| 5.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/6

---

Appeal brought on 30 March 2021 by Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 20 January 2021 in Case T-328/17 RENV, Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — M. J. Dairies (BBQLOUMI)

(Case C-201/21 P)

(2021/C 263/09)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (represented by: S. Malynicz QC, S. Baran, Barrister, V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), M. J. Dairies EOOD

By order of 21 May 2021 of the Vice-President, the Court of Justice held that the appeal is dismissed as inadmissible and that Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi shall bear its own costs.

---
No. 10484.

#### Breece *v.*The Colonial Lumber Company.

Decided October 20, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Lawrence county.

*Mr. A. R. Johnson*and *Mr. F. E.*Dougherty, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Miller &*Miller, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT NO. 10.4

 

 

MEMORANDUM

 

 

To:  George M. Gentile

From:  Edward E. Hood, Jr., Chairman

Management Development and Compensation Committee

Re:  Appointment as Chairman of the Board 

Gerber Scientific, Inc. (the "Company")

Date:  December 7, 2001 

 

 

The Board of Directors of Gerber Scientific, Inc. (the "Board"), with you abstaining, appointed you Chairman of the Board effective November 29, 2001.

In this non-executive position you will receive a fee of $12,500 per month in addition to your compensation as a non-employee Director of the Company.  This fee will be paid to you on the first Monday of each month and will be paid to you until you cease to be Chairman of the Board for any reason.

Effective December 7, 2001, you will receive a one-time special stock option award to purchase 50,000 shares of the Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant.  The options will fully vest one year from the date of your appointment, on November 29, 2002.

 

 

 

Edward E. Hood, Jr., Chairman

Management Development and

Compensation Committee 

of the Board of Directors
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  December 6, 2011 | Frederic F. Brace                                         |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                              | Chief Administrative Officer, Chief Restructuring Officer |
|                              | Chief Financial Officer                                   |
259 La. 751

#### Mrs. Dolores L. ROBERTSON v. Martin G. STAUB and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company.

No. 51575.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 1971.

In re: Dolores L. Robertson applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 248 So.2d 353.

Writ denied. On the facts found there is no error of law in the judgment.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

UTILITY ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Appellant

v. 

DIGITAL ALLY, INC.,

Appellee 

______________________ 

2016-1626

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-

00725.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

STEPHEN M. SCHAETZEL, Meunier Carlin & Curfman, 

LLC, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented 

by DAVID S. MORELAND. 

JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, 

KS, argued for appellee. Also represented by ADAM 

PRESCOTT SEITZ. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
# C_2022198EN.01001102.xml

| 16.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2022 — European Commission v Ireland

(Case C-126/21) (1)

(Action for failure to fulfil obligations - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Mutual recognition of decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention - Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA - Failure to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the framework decision - Failure to notify to the European Commission)

(2022/C 198/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Tomkin and S. Grünheid, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Ireland (represented by: M. Browne, M. Lane and J. Quaney, acting as Agents, and by M. Gray, Senior Counsel)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23 October 2009 on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention and by failing to notify the text of such provisions to the European Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 27 of that framework decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23 October 2009 on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention and by failing to notify the text of such provisions to the European Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 27 of that framework decision;

| 2. | Orders Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ireland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 26.4.2021.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GeneLink, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Monte E. Taylor, Jr., as
Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge
that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods shown in such report.


Date: April 9, 2007                     By: /s/ Monte E. Taylor, Jr.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Monte E. Taylor, Jr.,
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### WATSON *v.*WARDEN OF THE MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 48,

September Term, 1961.]

*Decided March 27, 1962.*

Before Bruñe, C. J., and Henderson, PIorney, Marbury, and Sybert, JJ.

Per Curiam.

Application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief is denied for the reasons set out in the opinion of the court below.
Alaska Department of Fish and Game

ADF&G Home » Fishing » Commercial

Commercial Fisheries

Fisheries by Area

Quick Links

News Releases & 

Announcements

 Licenses/Permits

 Regulations

 e-Library

 Jobs

Scientific and Technical 

Publications

Alaska Board of Fisheries

Commercial Fisheries Entry 

Commission

Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute

Older News Releases 

Prior to May 31, 2011

Alaska’s commercial fisheries are diverse, valuable, harvest a 

variety of finfish and shellfish species, and include both large 

and small vessels. Catcher processors over 300 feet in length 

operate in the Bering Sea pollock fishery while open skiffs of 20 

feet fish for salmon, herring, and halibut close to shore. In 

between all sizes and configurations of vessels work their 

respective fishing grounds.

Alaska’s largest and most valuable fisheries target salmon, 

pollock, crab, herring, halibut, shrimp, sablefish, and Pacific 

cod. The total value of Alaska’s commercial fisheries is $1.5

billion to the fishermen; with a wholesale value of $3.6 billion. 

Economists have estimated the seafood industry to contribute

$5.8 billion and 78,500 jobs to the Alaskan economy. Fisheries 

management in Alaska is based on scientific assessments and 

monitoring of harvested populations and is regarded as a

model of successful natural resource stewardship.

» Learn More

Adobe Acrobat PDF files require a free viewer 

available directly from Adobe. 

2011 Southeast Alaska Pink 

Salmon Sex Ratios by 

District

2011 NSEI (Chatham Strait) 

Sablefish Quota 

Announcement (PDF 235 

kB)

Preliminary Alaska 

Commercial Salmon 

Catches (Blue Sheet)

Upper Cook Inlet Offshore 

Test Fish Project

Commercial Fisheries, Alaska Department of Fish and Game Page 1 of 2

http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=fishingCommercial.main 8/25/2011
Commercial Fisheries, Alaska Department of Fish and Game Page 2 of 2

http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=fishingCommercial.main 8/25/2011
H. Res. 70

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

February 4, 1993.

Resolved, That the following named Member be elected

to the following standing Committee of the House of Representatives:

STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT: Nancy Pelosi, California, to rank after Benjamin L. Cardin, Maryland.

Attest:

Clerk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22-0203
IN RE THE PARENTING OF: R.D.R., A Minor Child, RICHARD DANE RENN,

Petitioner and Appellant, and NATALIA MERION BURCAR,

Respondent and Appellee. 

# FILED JUL 01 2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Suprerne Court State of Montana ORDER

Upon consideration ofAppellant's motion for extension oftime, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant has until September 2, 2022, within which to file the openingbrief. No further ext,

ensions will be granted. DATED this ' 'day ofJuly, 2022. For the Court,

ChiefJustice 07/01/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0203