Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2020
                              Brock Field, DC, DAB CR5739 (2020)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Brock Field, DC, DAB CR5739 (2020)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Brock Field, DC,
(PTAN: IB4089002)
(NPI: 1174639686)
Petitioner,

v.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-18-1345Decision No. CR5739October 19, 2020

        
              
    

      DECISION

Petitioner, Brock Field, DC, is a chiropractor, practicing in Iowa, who participates in the Medicare program as a supplier of services.  Following his chiropractic practice’s change of ownership, he applied to reassign his billing privileges to his new employer.  The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) granted his application with a retrospective billing date of March 3, 2018 (and, by inference, an effective date of April 2, 2018).  Petitioner now challenges that effective date.

Because Petitioner filed his subsequently-approved enrollment application on April 2, 2018, I find that April 2 is the correct effective date of his enrollment.

Background

In a letter dated April 12, 2018, the Medicare contractor, Wisconsin Physicians Service Government Health Administrators, advised Petitioner Field that it approved his initial Medicare enrollment application with an “effective date” of March 3, 2018.  CMS Ex. 3.  In fact, the contractor was granting Petitioner a *billing* date of March 3, 2018; the effective date of Petitioner’s enrollment was April 2, 2018 (see discussion below).

Page 2

Petitioner sought reconsideration, complaining that the contractor’s staff provided poor guidance and asking that the effective date of his enrollment be changed to December 12, 2017.  CMS Ex. 4.

In a reconsidered determination, dated July 23, 2018, a contractor hearing officer denied Petitioner the earlier effective date, concluding (in error) that March 3 was the correct effective date.  In fact, March 3 was a retrospective billing date.  CMS Ex. 1.

Petitioner appealed.

CMS moves for summary judgment.  However, because neither party proposes any witnesses, an in-person hearing would serve no purpose.  *See* Acknowledgment and Prehearing Order at 4, 5, 6 (¶¶ 4(c)(iv), 8, 10) (October 2, 2018).  I may therefore decide this case based on the written record, without considering whether the standards for summary judgment are satisfied.

With its motion and brief (CMS Br.), CMS submits four exhibits (CMS Exs. 1-4).  Petitioner submits a written response (P. Br.).

Discussion

***1. On April 2, 2018, Petitioner filed his subsequently-approved application to reassign his billing privileges, and his effective date can be no earlier than that date.  42 C.F.R. § 424.520(d).***1

**Enrollment**.  Petitioner Field participates in the Medicare program as a “supplier” of services.  Social Security Act § 1861(d); 42 C.F.R. § 498.2.  To receive Medicare payments for the services furnished to program beneficiaries, a prospective supplier must enroll in the program.  42 C.F.R. § 424.505.  “Enrollment” is the process by which CMS and its contractors:  1) identify the prospective supplier; 2) validate the supplier’s eligibility to provide items or services to Medicare beneficiaries; 3) identify and confirm a supplier’s owners and practice location; and 4) grant the supplier Medicare billing privileges.  42 C.F.R. § 424.502.

To enroll, a prospective supplier must complete and submit an enrollment application.  42 C.F.R. §§ 424.510(d)(1), 424.515(a).  An enrollment application is either a CMS-approved paper application or an electronic process approved by the Office of

Page 3

Management and Budget.  42 C.F.R. § 424.502.2
  When CMS determines that a prospective supplier meets the applicable enrollment requirements, it grants Medicare billing privileges, which means that the supplier can submit claims and receive payments from Medicare for covered services provided to program beneficiaries.  The effective date for his billing privileges “is the *later*of the date of filing” a subsequently-approved enrollment application or the date that the supplier first began furnishing services at a new practice location.  42 C.F.R. § 424.520(d) (emphasis added).

If a physician or non-physician practitioner meets all program requirements, CMS may allow him to bill retrospectively for up to 30 days prior to the effective date “if circumstances precluded enrollment in advance of providing services to Medicare beneficiaries . . . .”  42 C.F.R. § 424.521(a)(1).  Some Medicare contractors have created confusion because they are inclined to conflate the effective date with the retrospective billing date, as the contractor did in this case.  CMS Exs. 1, 3.  The distinction is important; I have the authority to review “the effective date of . . . supplier approval.”  42 C.F.R. § 498.3(b)(15).  But nothing in the regulations gives me the authority to review CMS’s determinations regarding retrospective billing.

Here, on April 2, 2018, the Medicare contractor received Petitioner’s enrollment application (CMS-855R), which it subsequently approved.  CMS Ex. 2.3
  Thus, pursuant to section 424.520(d), the date Petitioner filed his subsequently-approved enrollment application – April 2, 2018 – is the correct effective date of enrollment.  *Howard M. Sokoloff, DPM, MS, Inc.*, DAB No. 2972 (2019); *Urology Grp. of NJ, LLC*, DAB No. 2860 (2018); *Willie Goffney, Jr., M.D.*, DAB No. 2763 at 7 (2017), *aff’d* *sub. nom.* *Goffney v. Azar*, No. CV 17-8032 MRW (C.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 2019).

Pursuant to its authority under section 424.521(a)(1), CMS allowed Petitioner to bill retrospectively, back to March 3, 2018.

Petitioner, nevertheless, asks for the December 2017 effective date.  He explains that his employer was undergoing a change of ownership.  Its staff called the contractor to ask what documentation he should file but were not given “proper and accurate information

Page 4

in full.”  P. Br. at 2.  Petitioner is not entitled to an earlier effective date based on the inadequate or misleading guidance from a contractor’s employee.  The regulations are explicit, and neither the contractor nor its employees have the authority to change them – by providing misinformation or otherwise.  *See Heckler v. Cmty. Health Servs. of Crawford Cty.*, *Inc.*, 467 U.S. 51, 63 (1984) (holding that those who participate in the Medicare program are supposed to understand its rules); *Hartford HealthCare at Home, Inc.*, DAB No. 2787 at 8-9 (2017) (holding that purportedly misleading language in a state agency’s letters was not material where the regulations vest the Secretary and CMS, not the state agency, with the authority to impose remedies); *Schweiker v. Hansen*, 450 U.S. 785 (1981) (holding that a Social Security Administration employee’s erroneous advice – upon which an applicant for mother’s insurance benefits relied, to her detriment – did not estop the Secretary of Health and Human Services from denying her retroactive benefits for the period for which she was eligible for benefits but had not filed the required written application).

Nor may I grant Petitioner an earlier effective date based on any equitable or policy arguments.  *Sokoloff*, DAB No. 2972 at 9.

Conclusion

Because Petitioner filed his subsequently-approved enrollment application on April 2, 2018, CMS properly granted his Medicare enrollment effective that date.  CMS was authorized to allow him to bill retrospectively.


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law. back to note 1
                      2. CMS’s electronic process is referred to as PECOS (Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System). back to note 2
                      3. Form CMS-855R reassigns a physician’s or practitioner’s billing privileges to a Medicare-eligible entity, which may submit claims and receive payment for Medicare services provided by the practitioner.  On each page of the application (lower left corner), the contractor stamped Petitioner’s paper application with a “Julian date stamp,” which counts the days of the year consecutively.  The first four digits stamped on the application indicate the year filed – 2018.  The next three digits indicate the date filed, the 92nd day of 2018, or April 2.  CMS Ex. 2. back to note 3 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back