alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AERO TRADER 

7000 MERRILL AVENUE, BOX 19 

HANGAR A497, CHINO AIRPORT 

CHINO, CALIF. 91710 

(909) 597-4020 

May 4, 2016 

The Rules Docket (AGC-200) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, DC. 20591 

B-25 PARTS & MANUALS 

WARBIRD MAINTENANCE & RESTORATIONS 

Re: Petition for Exemption from Federal Aviation Regulation 14 CFR 91.315 

To Permit Flight Training For Compensation Or Hire In A Limited Category B-25 Aircraft 

To Whom It May Concern: 

AERO TRADER currently holds FAA Exemption No. 11073 to allow AERO TRADER to 

conduct initial and recurrent training in its North American B-25 (Limited Category) for 

compensation or hire. AERO TRADER wishes to renew this exemption, which expires on 

September 30, 2016, for the operation of AERO TRADER's North American B-25 aircraft. 

Very truly yours, 

Carl W

Scholl
# C_2020423EN.01003901.xml

| 7.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 423/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 423/39

---

Action brought on 22 September 2020 — YG v Commission

(Case T-599/20)

(2020/C 423/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: YG (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the European Commission dated 14 November 2019 not to include the applicant on the list of promoted officials for 2019; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Commission dated 14 November 2019 not to include the applicant on the list of promoted officials for 2019;

| — | annul the decision dated 11 June 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint against the decision of the European Commission dated 14 November 2019 not to include the applicant on the list of promoted officials; and, |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision dated 11 June 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint against the decision of the European Commission dated 14 November 2019 not to include the applicant on the list of promoted officials; and,

| — | order the reimbursement of the applicant’s incurred legal costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the reimbursement of the applicant’s incurred legal costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a violation of Article 45 of S.R. — Manifest errors of assessment — absence of comparative assessment:






  — | regarding both the evaluation of the applicant’s appraisal reports and the method of the comparative assessment ((i) on the absence of any comparative assessment and (ii) on the lack of comparative assessment with staff members from the same DG and of the same grade). |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a violation of Article 45 of S.R. — Manifest errors of assessment — absence of comparative assessment:

—

regarding both the evaluation of the applicant’s appraisal reports and the method of the comparative assessment ((i) on the absence of any comparative assessment and (ii) on the lack of comparative assessment with staff members from the same DG and of the same grade).

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a violation of Article 25, second indent, of S.R. (duty to state reasons). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a violation of Article 25, second indent, of S.R. (duty to state reasons).

---
#### Johnnie JOHNSON v. John P. OWEN and N.O.P.S.I. et al.

No. 62564.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 15, 1978.

In re: Johnnie Johnson applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 359 So.2d 272.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the *786record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6531

JAMES EDWARD LOWE, III, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus DOCTOR SHAH, Medical Officer; DOCTOR GUZMAN, Medical Officer; DOCTOR ALLEN, Clinical Director; PA/MLP YIRGA, Physician Assistant; PA/MLP HILLETEWORK, Physician Assistant; PA/MLP OSORIO, Physician Assistant; DOCTOR BHULLER, Defendants - Appellees, and JAMES M. BROOKS, Warden; HARLEY LAPPIN, Regional Director Mid-Atlantic Region; KATHLEEN HAWK-SAWYER, Director, Defendants,
versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Party in Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-1423-1) Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: July 1, 2005- 2 - Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Edward Lowe, III, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c)* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). - 3 - PER CURIAM: James Edward Lowe, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens * complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lowe v. Shah , No. CA-03-1423-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Windell LONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-931.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 28, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
THE FORM 10-KSB FOR THE ANNUAL PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         566,767
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  144,652
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,350
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               700,774
<PP&E>                                         600,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                 388,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 919,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          437,690
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,671
<OTHER-SE>                                     456,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   919,304
<SALES>                                      1,856,336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,856,336
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,890,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             203,604
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,227,718)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,227,718)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,227,718)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)




</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Harris Ravine, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-K of Fischer Imaging Corporation;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, thisannual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this annualreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;

 

4.The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

 

b.Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisannual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annualreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c.Disclosed in this annual reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

5.The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

 

a.All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b.Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  March 31, 2005 | /s/  HARRIS  RAVINE           |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                  | Harris  Ravine                          |
|                  | *Chief Executive Officer and President* |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            1048
<SECURITIES>                                        87
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6218
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1135
<INVENTORY>                                         74
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  8060
<PP&E>                                           59376
<DEPRECIATION>                                   47851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   19761
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5389
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           570
<OTHER-SE>                                       13802
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     19761
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 20974
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    19187
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   226
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1561
<INCOME-TAX>                                        16
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1545
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1545
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
Appendix V

PCE’s for the Alameda Whipsnake 

Assessment Endpoint Measure of Ecological Effect 

(PCE 1) Scrub/shrub communities with a 

mosaic of open and closed canopy 

Distribution of EC25 for monocots (seedling 

emergence, vegetative vigor, or ECOTOX 

Distribution of EC25 for dicots (seedling emergence, 

vegetative vigor, or ECOTOX)

(PCE 2) Woodland or annual grassland 

plant communities contiguous to lands 

containing PCE 1: 

Distribution of EC25 for monocots (seedling 

emergence, vegetative vigor, or ECOTOX 

Distribution of EC25 for dicots (seedling emergence, 

vegetative vigor, or ECOTOX)

(PCE 3) Lands containing rock outcrops, 

talus, and small mammal burrows 

within or adjacent to PCE 1 and or PCE 2 

Distribution of EC25 for monocots (seedling 

emergence, vegetative vigor, or ECOTOX 

Distribution of EC25 for dicots (seedling emergence, 

vegetative vigor, or ECOTOX) 

Most sensitive mammal acute LD50 (guideline or 

ECOTOX) 

Most sensitive mammal chronic NOAEC (guideline 

or ECOTOX)
NOx lnstallation mld Component Suppliers 

## WORLDWIDE UTILITY PLANS NOx Installation and Component Suppliers THE MciLVAINE COMPANY Pag.e I of (i


# .- I .!

-11



# .. f!! 

# ,- H Ifl o Z

"0 ../' '.D 

### ._.- f----.- 156

-- 

### 350 

## -_

... 350 

### kloo**~OO** [350

-- 156

. ... 

### 113 156 1075 156**~o (~ounh'Y:IJapan**  pl:lIIt lI:lll\(' ,tn rt II p lilli' " id

### uti1il~ Ilal11l;' supplier

### tcrhllolo~, l'flki('IIl"

### ~J~~ 1970 iChila

## --~**~hubu** Electric

## ---_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_:r.-M~H;I===:~========;S~C=R~--.j---+r70~O:':'--1 1977 Kainan

_ _ __ . 1 

### lKansai Electric F B:..;:3.::..bc:....;.o .::..ck Hitachi 

### FS..;;.Cc::..;R,--_ 75 1978:hita :5

### ~hubll Electric 

### Babcock'Hitachi ._... .. SCR -·;-8:'"':0:0----+-- 1978 I\..-:hita J K::hubu Electric 

## --"-"--BabCock Hitachi:---PS-'-C';;'R'----+=g:"::O-'_--**'~~_~~--~-+~--E:=-=~~=-7-----"'** 

## __**'~~=~~:"""'---E=--~~--1----1** 1978 Himeii 1 lKansai Electric

### ._~_._ .. fIHl;-;;-

### f.S~C:::R~--t----+~-~ 

# 19n- 6hi :2**ro~)'o** Electric P_ower 

# 'HI =,CR 1978 Ooi '__ .)

### rr~ Electric Power
.. IHl ---tS:-::IC::::R=--

__ --t-

__ -f:..::.;:.._-J 1978 Shin Kokura 3 Kvushu EleclrIC POWCI'___

_

### _~1HI.------ .....

### S::..;IC:::.:'::;;..t--~-- 1978 Shin Kokura 

### IKvushu Electric Power [MHI 

### SCI{ 1978 lYokohama 1 

### rrokvo Electric Power

- ------+B..:ca:.:...b-CI)-c-k-H-i-ta--c-hi----------fSCR 

# 1978-**IYok()~uka---** 

### 14 [Tokyo 

### Electric Power MHI

_**~CR** 1978, bsaka iKansai Electric 

### 1I'v1.H 1**~CR** 1994

__ .**...------~---.--** 

### --1------
..**L~78,19~Q.t~nagasaki** Higashi 

### I 

## ,L Kansai Electric !Babcock 

### Hitachi SCR 0 1978, I 990 Iosaka
. _ Kansai 

### Electric MHI

### ----+.S:-:'C::'R~---F:-.---J::::....:..::_-~ 1979 Kudamatsu 1-3 [Chugokt! Electric

### ~HI iSCR

## ~'---All1agasaki**~:~-** Kansai Electric

-- ._-

## SCR-------i~-,o---f~::::.......--J f....--.-
.. _ .- .. f---.
.. .**198~.** __ rKasugadc Dalsa'_I**~~lIsal** ElectriC
...... .. _ .. __**.~** __ .... IHl +S::-:'(::::i,..:....'

__ 

## -+**-+13~1.:::.3_-t** 1980 Nishi Nag<?X!:!.. _ 6 

### ,.JlUbuElectric_ IHI**~_t:S-:::(C=R'----** __ F-0

__**-+5..:::00~---l** 

### 1980 

### Iosaka , Kansai Electric 

### MHI SCR .__ 156 1 Q80 Sakaiko _.- 1 Kan"sa'-j -E-h;-·c-t-r-ic-----**iM~** 

# - - OCR 75 "1250 - 

### 1980 Sakaiko

- 

# '5**-lKa~sai Eleclri~**  _-.-- .. -

__ -_.- .. -

### -"(B;;'beOck·~·-:II-ta-c-;-h~1**---E~:-"'-,c:-':-'R::......---+-17-=-5-----f:~-** 

## l)86
..**_=~bi~n ~-·**  6 l<:!!ns!!J Elcctric ._ ....... __

## .~- ... !Y'HI

## _.~ ..

## ----~=~SC'R 

## .**~~_._ -25-'O-,,_~="""-**  !980
.. _ Shin!.()l1oscki

m.

_ )lugoku EIcClric

__ ._.___ __**_~L** 

## _._ SCR**~1=--50=--_---l..:...1 7.~5.**  __**~O_** .. _ Shin NagoY:l_

_ 3 :'hubu Elcct_o_c -1..:.- M

:.;;.H:..:;.'_ SCR

_ _ _ 

### 220

_ http://www.mellvalnecornp:llly.COlll/utility/sllhscriber/Uti) I [y I' IansfwwlIti I i lyplanspages/NOx mktcoumry I .asp?collntry=J ;lpa n 1i7120l)fl
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 278 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 278

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to permit Members, 
 in specified circumstances, to vote by secure electronic device from 
                            their districts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 15, 1993

  Mr. Kasich (for himself, Mrs. Schroeder, Mr. Condit, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
Lightfoot, Mr. Hall of Ohio, Ms. Waters, Mr. Ravenel, Mr. Abercrombie, 
  Mr. de Lugo, Mr. Portman, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Filner, Mr. Kingston, Mr. 
Hoekstra, Mr. Ortiz, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, and Mr. Lipinski) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to permit Members, 
 in specified circumstances, to vote by secure electronic device from 
                            their districts.

    Resolved, (a) That rule I of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
    ``13.(a) He shall devise and implement a system subject to his 
direction and control to allow each Member to vote in the House and in 
the Committee of the Whole using a secure, electronic device from a 
location (which the Speaker shall approve) within that Member's 
congressional district if the Member notifies the Speaker that any of 
the following circumstances exist--
            ``(1) the Member is seriously ill;
            ``(2) the Member's spouse, child, or stepchild is seriously 
        ill;
            ``(3) a child has been born to the Member or the Member's 
        spouse within the past 2 weeks;
            ``(4) the Member's spouse, child, stepchild, parent, or 
        sibling has died within the past 2 weeks; or
            ``(5) a natural disaster as declared by the President or 
        the Governor has occurred within the Member's district within 
        the past 2 weeks;
and that Member obtains the prior written approval of the Speaker.
    ``(b) As used in this clause, the term `seriously ill' has the same 
meaning as the term serious health condition (except a mental 
condition) as defined in section 101 of the Family and Medical Leave 
Act of 1993.''.
    (b) The Committee on Rules is authorized and directed to report any 
amendments to the Rules of the House of Representatives by September 
21, 1994, necessary to effectuate clause 13 of rule I.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a list of all subsidiaries of Kalan Gold Corporation as of
December 31, 1999.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Name of Subsidiary                   Jurisdiction of Incorporation
                                     Or Organization
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                  <C>
Animated Electronic Industries Sdn   Malaysia
Bhd ("AEI"), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company

Vistel (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, a 51%     Malaysia
owned subsidiary of AEI.

Perwimas Telecommunications Sdn      Malaysia
Bhd, a 70% owned subsidiary of AEI.
</TABLE>
#### Catherine H. CARTER, Managing Trustee of the Howarth Trust, Appellant, v. Mary S. HOWARTH, Appellee.

No. U-35.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 20, 1973.

*443Gordon H. Harris and Phillip R. Finch, of Gray, Adams, Harris & Robinson, Orlando, for appellant.

Robert A. Meade, Jr., of Duffett, Barry & Seps, Ormond Beach, and Sidney H. Taylor, De Land, for appellee.

JOHNSON, Acting Chief Judge.

This interlocutory appeal seeks reversal of the trial court’s order granting defendant-appellee’s motion to add certain named persons as parties defendants.

In her capacity as managing trustee of the Howarth Trust, appellant instituted the present action by seeking a restraining order to forestall litigation affecting trust assets. By an amended restraining order, the trial court permitted defendants to file any defenses, answers, motions, counter- or cross-claims, notices or other such pleadings. Thereafter, defendant moved to add certain persons as parties defendants upon the ground that the central issue of the case as embraced in the pleadings subsequently filed by appellee, is the validity of the trust itself.

The trial court granted appellee’s motion to add as parties those persons named as beneficiaries of the Howarth Trust and certain persons who had purchased property from said Trust. Appellant now contends that this ruling was erroneous.

We do not agree. In light of the well-known principles that all persons materially interested in the subject matter of a suit should be made parties thereto and that all persons whose rights or interests may be affected by the cancellation of an instrument are proper and necessary parties, we do not believe that the trial judge abused his discretion in granting appellee’s motion to add parties defendants.

The appellant having failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in entering the order appealed herein, the same is accordingly affirmed.

SPECTOR, J., and YAWN, THERON A., Associate Judge, concur.