alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32-1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of The Goldfield Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John H.
Sottile, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Goldfield Corporation and will be retained by The Goldfield Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ JOHN H. SOTTILEJohn H. SottileChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)November 14, 2008
#### Robert Ralph MORET, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41939.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 6, 1972.

Certiorari dismissed, sua sponte. 255 So.2d 273.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 21.1



                      NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                     Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries of Registrant
                               as of June 24, 1998

<TABLE>
<S>                                                    <C>
N.E.T. APLA, Inc.................................      (State of Incorporation: Delaware)

N.E.T. China, Inc................................      (State of Incorporation: Delaware)

N.E.T. Credit Corporation........................      (State of Incorporation:  California)

N.E.T. Europe Ltd................................      (Incorporated Under the Laws of England)

N.E.T. Europe S.A................................      (Incorporated Under the Laws of France)

N.E.T. Federal, Inc..............................      (State of Incorporation: Delaware)

N.E.T. International, Inc........................      (Incorporated Under the Laws of Barbados)

N.E.T. Japan, Inc................................      (State of Incorporation: Delaware)

Network Equipment Technologies Europe GmbH.......      (Incorporated Under the Laws of Germany)
</TABLE>
#### Archie FORREST, Petitioner, v. Robert William BOYD, Respondent.

No. 41686.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 23, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 252 So.2d 300.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
[No. 489-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

June 14, 1971.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Loney Louis Johnson, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 52571, Story Birdseye, J., entered March 25, 1970. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SkillSoft Public
Limited Company (the "Company") for the period ended January 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Thomas J. McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

            (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: April 15, 2004                   /s/Thomas J. McDonald
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Thomas J. McDonald
                                        Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 207 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 207

Impeaching Robert F. Collins, judge of the United States District Court 
for the Eastern District of Louisiana, of bribery and other high crimes 
                           and misdemeanors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 1993

     Mr. Brooks (for himself and Mr. Fish) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Impeaching Robert F. Collins, judge of the United States District Court 
for the Eastern District of Louisiana, of bribery and other high crimes 
                           and misdemeanors.

    Resolved, That Robert F. Collins, judge of the United States 
District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, is impeached of 
bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors.

                                 <all>
```
#### WESTERN CONTRACTING CORP. v. Claude R. KIRK, Jr.

No. 38261.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 1969.

Appeal dismissed without opinion. 216 So.2d 503.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1017

To withhold all United States funds from the United Nations unless the

United Nations carries out certain administrative and budgetary reforms.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. PRESSLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Foreign Relations

A BILL

To withhold all United States funds from the United Nations

unless the United Nations carries out certain administrative and budgetary reforms.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, notwithstanding any provision of law or treaty, no

4 United States funds shall be made available to the United

5 Nations or any of its specialized agencies unless the Presi6 dent certifies to the Congress that—

7 (1)(A) the United Nations has established a

8 permanent position of inspector general within its

9 administrative staff;
2

•S 1017 IS

1 (B) the United Nations inspector general has

2 begun to carry out his duties; and

3 (2) the United Nations is conducting budgetary

4 audits, reviewing those audits, and implementing

5 corrective measures, if necessary.

Æ
#### Harry T. BEGG, III, et al. v. The ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF the ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS et al.

No. 62621.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Harry T. Begg, III, etc., et al., applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.
# C_2020255EN.01002801.xml

| 3.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/28

---

Action brought on 8 June 2020 — Team Beverage v EUIPO — Zurich Deutscher Herold Lebensversicherung (Team Beverage)

(Case T-359/20)

(2020/C 255/36)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Team Beverage AG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch, N. Willich und N. Achilles, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Zurich Deutscher Herold Lebensversicherung AG (Bonn, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark Team Beverage — Application for registration No 17 665 704

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 April 2020 in Case R 2727/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 18 and 47 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 10 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 18 and 47 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 10 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
August 6, 2015 

Dear Mr. Kadiwal: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA−2015−1804). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 8/20/15. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 11

        FRESENIUS NATIONAL MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES AND
                    EARNINGS USED IN PER SHARE COMPUTATIONS

     The weighted average number of shares of common Stock outstanding were 
as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   (IN THOUSANDS)
                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED     NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                         SEPTEMBER 30,         SEPTEMBER 30,
                                     -------------------    ------------------
                                       1996       1995        1996      1995
                                     --------    -------    -------    -------
<S>                                  <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Weighted average number of shares
  of Common Stock outstanding         $91,092    $96,708    $95,188    $95,330 
</TABLE>
 
     Income used in the computation of earnings per share was as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE)
                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED     NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                         SEPTEMBER 30,         SEPTEMBER 30,
                                     -------------------    ------------------
                                       1996       1995        1996      1995
                                     --------    -------    -------    -------
<S>                                  <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Net income                            $(2,518    $20,710    $62,881    $83,831 
Dividends paid on preferred
  stocks                                 (230)      (131)      (391)      (392) 
                                      -------    -------    -------    -------
Income used in per share 
computation of earnings               $(2,388)   $20,579    $62,490    $83,439 
                                      =======    =======    =======    =======

Earnings per share                    $  0.03    $  0.21    $  0.66    $  0.88 
</TABLE>


                                      I-31
# C_2023164EN.01000502.xml

| 8.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 March 2023 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria

(Case C-174/21) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2008/50/EC - Ambient air quality - Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations - Article 260(2) TFEU - Obligation to take the necessary measures to comply with such a judgment - Failure to fulfil that obligation alleged by the European Commission - Lack of clarity of the letter of formal notice as to whether the judgment still had to be complied with on the reference date - Principle of legal certainty - Inadmissibility)

(2023/C 164/06)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Noll-Ehlers and I. Zaloguin, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Bulgaria (represented initially by L. Zaharieva, T. Mitova and M. Georgieva, and finally by L. Zaharieva and T. Mitova, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Bulgaria; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Bulgaria;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 206, 31.5.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheet of Global Marine Inc. and subsidiaries
as of 3-31-00 and the related condensed consolidated statement of income for
the three months ended 3-31-00, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          31,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,300
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               161,400
<PP&E>                                       2,393,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 488,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,246,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,400
<BONDS>                                        595,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,500
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,136,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,246,900
<SALES>                                          3,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               204,100
<CGS>                                            1,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  175,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,600
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07






</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 989

To provide that the State Health Insurance Program of Hawaii is eligible

for reimbursement from certain funds appropriated to the Public Health

and Social Services Emergency Fund, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 18, 1993

Mrs. MINK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To provide that the State Health Insurance Program of

Hawaii is eligible for reimbursement from certain funds

appropriated to the Public Health and Social Services

Emergency Fund, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HAWAII STATE HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, expenses

5 incurred over the 12-month period beginning on the date

6 of enactment of this Act by the State of Hawaii for operat7 ing its State Health Insurance Program (SHIP) shall be

8 eligible for reimbursement from funds appropriated to the
2

•HR 989 IH

1 Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund under

2 Public Law 102–366 and under subsequent appropriations

3 Acts.

Æ
# C_2023104EN.01001201.xml

| 20.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/12

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto — Juízo Central Cível da Póvoa de Varzim — Portugal) — Gencoal S.A. v Conceito Norte — Consultadoria de Gestão, Lda., BT

(Case C-669/21, (1) Gencoal)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Absence of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2023/C 104/14)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto — Juízo Central Cível da Póvoa de Varzim

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gencoal S.A.

Defendants: Conceito Norte — Consultadoria de Gestão, Lda., BT

Other party: Companhia de Seguros Allianz Portugal SA

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto — Juízo Central Cível da Póvoa de Varzim (District Court, Oporto — Central Civil Court No 5, Póvoa de Varzim, Portugal), made by decision of 21 October 2021, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.

---
RONALD COOPER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5197

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 9, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Frank E. Sheffield, Judge.

Ronald Cooper, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           9,793
<SECURITIES>                                   114,870
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                       621
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               174,266
<PP&E>                                         584,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 773,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,591
<BONDS>                                        462,868
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           225
<OTHER-SE>                                     212,148
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   773,707
<SALES>                                        315,659
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               315,659
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  227,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,588
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,838
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,838
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 29, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00319

- CV

Joseph Aaron HENRY

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15802A Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Pro se Appellant’s brief was due to be filed in this appeal on or before August 5, 2016.

Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed. Appellant filed a letter requesting judicial notice; however, this letter d id not constitute an appellate brief. Therefore, this Court

ordered a ppellant to file his brief on or before August 22, 2016. Appellant has not filed a

response.

Because no b rief has been filed, it is ORDERED appellant show cause in writing within ten days from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(a).

Response should include a reasonable explanation for fail ure to timely file the brief and

should demonstrate affirmative steps taken to remedy the deficienc y . If appellant intend s for the response to act as a motion for extension of time, it must comply with Rule 10.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Proced ure and the Fourth Court of Appeals’ local rules. If appellant no longer wishes to pursue this appeal, the response should include a motion to dismiss.

If this Court does not receive an adequate response within ten days, the appeal will be

dismiss ed for want of prosecution. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1).

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of August, 201 6

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court