# Part 70 Air Quality Permit

Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

P.O. Box 326 Harleyville, SC 29448

(Permit updated 12/8/05 and 11//8/06)



### In accordance with the provisions of the Pollution Contr ol Act, Sections 48

- 1

- 50(5) and 48

- 1

- 110(a), and the 1976 Code of Laws of South Carolina, as amended, Regulation 61

- 62, the above named permittee is hereby granted permission to discharge air contaminants into the ambient air. The Bureau of Air Quality au thorizes the operation of this facility and its applicable equipment specified herein in accordance with the plans, specifications and other information submitted in the Title V permit application dated March 15, 2002.

This permit is subject to and condit ioned upon the terms, limitations, standards, and schedules contained in or specified on the 90 pages, with the accompanying attachments, of this permit.

Permit Number: TV

- 0900

- 0004 Effective Date: January 1, 2003

Issue Date: October 23, 2002 Expiration Date: September 30, 2007

__________________________________ Director, Engineering Services Division Bureau of Air Quality

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 2 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

RECORD OF REVISIONS

Revision

Number Final

Revision

Date Type of Revision

(AA, MM, SM) Description of Change (Specific Parts

, Sections, and Tables Revised or Added)

1 7/02/04 AA, MM Modified permit to include the requirements of construction permits 0900

- 0004

- DZ, 0900

- 0004

- EA

and 0900

- 0004

- EB. Also updated facility contact

information.

2 12/8/05 AA, MM Modified permit to incl ude the requirements of construction permit 0900

- 0004

- EC, new equipment additions and insignificant activity additions. Also

removed all SC Standard 4 Section VIII individual

PM emission limits and all alternative monitoring and waiver of recordkeeping or reporting conditions.

C ondition 4.B.6 m odified for CERR.

3 11/8/06 AA Modified permit to include part of condition 21 from the PSD construction permit, 0900

- 0004

- EF

issued 8/18/06. The new non

- methane VOC BACT limits were incorporated. Changes were made t o Tables 5.21 and 6.10. Conditions 5.E.2 (l) and 6.B.6 (ee) were added and condition 6.B.6 (bb) changed.

References to old NMVOC limit in table 5.29 were

removed.

3 11/8/06 MM Modified permit to incorporate three construction permits:

1. EE issued 2/27/0 6 for a new Marl Silo 12. Table

5.5 was modified.

2. EG issued 6/15/06 for an additional raw material feed system. Table 5.6 and 5.18 were modified, and

condition 5.E.1(g) added. 3. EH issued 7/31/06 for upgrading of the Fredenhagen clinker conveyor. Table 5.3 and 5.10 were modified, and condition 5.E.4(c) added.

3 11/8/06 MM A

- frame: Table 5.26 (old Table 5.32) modified to remove 40 CFR 63, Subpart LLL applicability and added Standard 4 requirements. Condition 5.E.6 (a) was deleted and condition 5.E.6 (c ) was added, to reflect Standard 4 applicability.

3 11/8/06 AA Change all references from facility name to owner/operator in parts 5 and 6.

AA = Administrative Amendment

MM = Minor Modification

SM = Significant Modification



### Send copies of all revisions to Permit File, Main File, Regional EQC Office, US EPA, and Facility

Contact.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 3 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

A. Applicable Permit Dates

B. Facility Information

C. Facility Address

D. Facility Billing Address

Part 2.0 APPLICABILITY

Pa rt 3.0 GENERAL CONDITIONS

A. Permit Issuance

B. Permit Expiration and Renewal

C. Severability

D. Fee Assessment and Payment

E. Submittal of Information

F. Public Participation

G. Permit Reopening

H. Temporary Sources

I. Emergency Provisions

J. Property Ri ghts

K. Economic Incentives, Marketable Permits, Emission Trading

L. Title IV Sources

M. Administrative Permit Amendments

N. Minor Permit Modifications

O. Significant Modification Procedures

P. Duty to Comply Q. Inspection and Entry

R. Compliance Requireme nts
S. Schedule of Compliance

T. Need to Halt or Reduce Activity Not a Defense

U. Operational Flexibility

Part 4.0 FACILITY WIDE REQUIREMENTS

A. Emissions Limits and Standards

B. Facility Wide Conditions

Part 5.0 EMISSION UNIT REQUIREMENTS

A. Emission Unit Description

B. Control Devices Description

C. Equipment Description

D. Emissions Limits and Standards

E. Emission Unit Conditions

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 4 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### Part 6.0 MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

A. Monitoring and Reporting

B. Monitoring and Reporting Conditions

Part 7.0 ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS

A. Specific Conditions

B. Operational Flexibility

C. Compliance Schedule

D. Permit Shield

ATTACHMENT A

- Modeled Emission Rates

ATTACHMENT B

- Insignificant Activities

ATTACHMENT C

- Applicable and Non

- applicable Federal and St ate Regulations

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 5 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### PART 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

A. APPLICABLE PERMIT DATES

ISSUE DATE: October 23, 2002

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 2003

EXPIRATION DATE: September 30, 2007

RENEWAL APPLICATION DUE: March 31, 2007

B. FACILITY INFORMATION

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTACT Gary Fields

CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER 843

- 462

- 7651 Ext. 3191

CONTACT FAX NUMBER: 843

- 462

- 7679

INTERNET E

- MAIL ADDRESS: Gary.Fields@lafarge

- na.com FACILITY LOCATION: Highway 453 and I

- 26

COUNTY Dorchester SIC CODE(S): 3241 NAICS CODE(S): 327310

AFS C ODE: 4503500004

C. FACILITY ADDRESS

FACILITY NAME: Lafarge Building Materials, Inc.

ADDRESS: 463 Judge Street CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: Harleyville, SC 29448

D. FACILITY BILLING ADDRESS

FACILITY NAME: Lafarge Building Materials, Inc.

ADDRESS: 463 Judge St reet CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: Harleyville, SC 29448

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 6 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### PART 2.0 APPLICABILITY [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.3(a)]

The following sources are subject to permitting requirements of Part 70:

1. Any major source;

2. Any source, including an area source, subject to a standard, limitation, or other requirement under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act (Act);

3. Any source, including an area source, subject to a standard or other requirement under Section 112 of the Act, except that a source is not required to obtain a permit solely because it is subject to regulations or requirements under Section 112(r) of the Act;

4. Any affected source under the Title IV Acid Rain Program;

5. Any source in a source category designated by the Administrator of the US Environmental

Pr otection Agency (US EPA) (Administrator) pursuant to this Section; and

6. Any source listed in SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.3(a) that is exempt from the requirement to obtain a permit under SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.3(b) may opt to apply for a permit under this

Pa rt 70 program.

The following source categories are exempted from the obligation to obtain a Part 70 permit, but are not exempted from other SC Department of Health and Environmental Control (Department) and US EPA requirements [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.3(b) (4)]:

1. All sources and source categories that would be required to obtain a permit solely because they are subject to 40CFR60, Subpart AAA

- Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters; and

2. All sources and source categories that would be required to obtain a permit solely because they are subject to 40 CFR 61, Subpart M

- National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Asbestos, Section 61.145, Standard for Demolition and Renovation.

PART 3.0 GENERAL CONDITIONS

This sect ion describes conditions and provisions applicable to all Part 70 sources. Specific source category conditions and requirements are contained in Part 5.0 of this permit. (Revised 05/21/99)



### A. PERMIT ISSUANCE [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(a)(1)]

A permit, permit modification, or renewal may be issued only if the following conditions have been

met:

1. The Department has received a complete application for a permit, permit modification, or permit renewal;

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 7 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### 2. Except for modifications qualifying for minor per mit modification procedures under SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(e)(2) and (3), the Department has complied with the requirements for public participation under SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(h);

3. The Department has complied with the requirements for notifying and responding to affected States under SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.8(b);

4. The conditions of the permit provide for compliance with all applicable requirements and the requirements of Part 70; and

5. The Administrator has received a copy of the proposed permit and any notices required under SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.8(a) and (b), and has not objected to issuance of the permit under SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.8(c) within the required time frame.

A Title V operating permit does not excuse any facility from the preconstr uction permitting requirements under SC Regulation 61

- 62.1.

B. PERMIT EXPIRATION AND RENEWAL [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(c)] (Revised 11/13/98)



### Permit expiration terminates the source’s right to operate unless a timely and complete renewal application has been submitted consistent with SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.5(a)(1)(iii), 62.70.5(a)(2)(iv), and 62.70.7(b). In this case, the permit shall not expire until the renewal permit has been issued or denied. All terms and conditions of the permit including any per mit shield that may be granted pursuant to SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(f) shall remain in effect until the renewal permit has been issued or denied.

Permits being renewed are subject to the same procedural requirements, including those for public participati on, affected State and US EPA review, that apply to initial permit issuance.

C. SEVERABILITY [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(5)]

The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit, or application of any provision of this permi t to any circumstance is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit shall not be affected thereby.

D. FEE ASSESSMENT AND PAYMENT [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(7)]

The owners or operators of Pa rt 70 sources shall pay fees to the Department consistent with the fee schedule approved pursuant to South Carolina Regulation 62.70.9.

E. SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(6)(v)]

The permittee shall furnish to the Department, withi n a reasonable time, any information that the Department may request, in writing, to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking, reissuing, or terminating the permit or to determine compliance with the permit. Upon request, the permittee shall also furnish to the Department copies of records required to be kept by the permit or,

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 8 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### for information claimed to be confidential, the permittee may furnish such records directly to the Administrator along with a claim of confidentiality. The Department m ay also request that the permittee furnish such records directly to the Administrator along with a claim of confidentiality.

F. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(h)]

Except for modifications qualifying for minor permit modification procedur es, all permit proceedings, including initial permit issuance, significant modifications, and renewals, shall provide adequate procedures for public notice including offering an opportunity for public comment and hearing on the draft permit. These procedu res shall meet all requirements of SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(h).

G. PERMIT REOPENING [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(f)] (Revised 05/21/99)



### This permit shall be reopened and revised under any of the following circumstances:

1. Additional applicable requiremen ts under the Act become applicable to a major Part 70 source for which three or more years remain on the original term of the permit. Such revisions shall be made not later than eighteen (18) months following promulgation of relevant standards or regulati ons unless the regulation specifically provides for a longer compliance period. No such reopening is required if the effective date of the requirement is later than the date on which the permit is due to expire, unless the original permit or any of

its te rms and conditions has been extended pursuant to SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(c)(1)(ii).

2. Additional requirements, including excess emission requirements, become applicable to an affected source under the acid rain program. Excess emissions offset plans sh all be deemed to be incorporated into this permit upon approval by the Administrator.

3. The Department or EPA determines that the permit contains a material mistake or that inaccurate statements were made in establishing the emissions standards or other terms or conditions of the permit.

4. The Administrator or the Department determines that the permit must be revised or revoked to assure compliance with the applicable requirements.

In addition, the permit may be modified, revoked, reopened, and reissued, or terminated for cause by the Department. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or of a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit conditi on. [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(6)(iii)]

Proceedings to reopen and issue a permit shall follow the same procedures as apply to initial permit issuance and shall affect only those parts of the permit for which cause to reopen exists. Such reopenings shal l be as expeditious as practicable. Reopenings shall not be initiated before a notice of such intent is provided to the Part 70 source by the Department at least thirty (30) days in advance of the date that the permit is to be reopened, except that the De partment may provide a shorter time period in the case of an emergency.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 9 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### H. TEMPORARY SOURCES [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(e)]

In accordance with SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(e), the Department may issue a single permit authorizing emissions from similar operat ions by the same source owner or operator at multiple temporary locations. The operation must be temporary and involve at least one change in location during the term of the permit. No sources subject to Title IV of the Act shall be permitted as a

tempor ary source.

I. EMERGENCY PROVISIONS [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(g)(3)] (Revised 05/21/99)



### In the case of an emergency, as defined in SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(g), the permittee shall verify an affirmative defense of emergency through properly signed, cont emporaneous operating logs, or other

relevant evidence that:

1. An emergency occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the emergency;

2. The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated; and

3. During the period of the e mergency the permittee took all reasonable steps to minimize levels of emissions that exceeded the emission standards, or other requirements in the permit.;

Additionally, the permittee shall submit verbal notification of the emergency to the Department

wi thin twenty

- four (24) hours of the time when emission limitations were exceeded, followed by written notifications within thirty (30) days. This notice fulfills the requirement of SC Regulation

61

- 62.70.6(a)(3)(iii)(B). This notice must contain a descrip tion of the emergency, any steps taken to mitigate emissions, and corrective actions taken.

This provision is in addition to any emergency or upset provision contained in any applicable requirement. In any enforcement proceeding, the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an emergency has the burden of proof.

J. PROPERTY RIGHTS [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(6)(iv)]

This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privilege.

K. ECONOMIC INCENTIVES, MARKETABLE PERM ITS, EMISSION TRADING [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(8)]

No permit revision shall be required, under any approved economic incentives, marketable permits, emissions trading and other similar programs or processes for changes that are provided for in this

p ermit.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 10 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### L. TITLE IV SOURCES [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(4)]

The permittee is prohibited from emissions exceeding any allowances that the source lawfully holds under Title IV of the Act or the regulations promulgated thereunder. No permit revision s hall be required for increases in emissions that are authorized by allowances acquired pursuant to the acid rain program, provided that such increases do not require a permit revision under any other applicable requirement. No limit shall be placed on the number of allowances held by a source. The source may not, however, use allowances as a defense for noncompliance with any other applicable requirement. Any such allowances shall be accounted for according to the procedures established in regulations pr omulgated under Title IV of the Act.

Where an applicable requirement of the Act is more stringent than an applicable requirement of regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Act, both provisions shall be incorporated into the permit and shall be enfor ceable by the Administrator. [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(1)(ii)]

M. ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT AMENDMENTS [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(d)(3)]

An administrative permit amendment as defined in SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(d) can be made by the Department consistent with the following:

1. The Department shall take no more than sixty (60) days from receipt of a request for an administrative permit amendment to take final action on such request, and may incorporate such changes without providing notice to the public or affected States provided that it designates any such permit revisions as having been made pursuant to this paragraph.

2. The Department shall submit a copy of the revised permit to the Administrator.

3. The source may implement the changes addressed in the request for an administrative amendment immediately upon submittal of the request, except transfer/ownership which must comply with SC Regulation 61

- 62.1, Section II(E).

N. MINOR PERMIT MODIFICATIONS [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(e)(2)]

Minor permit mod ifications can be made by the Department in accordance with SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(e)(2)(i). An application requesting the use of minor permit modification procedures shall meet the requirements of SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.5(c) and shall include items as specified in SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(e)(2)(ii).

The Department may modify the procedure outlined in SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(e)(2) to process groups of a source's applications for certain modifications eligible for minor permit modification processing. G roup processing of minor permit applications will proceed as outlined in SC Regulation

61

- 62.70.7(e)(3).

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 11 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### O. SIGNIFICANT MODIFICATION PROCEDURES [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(e)(4)]

Significant permit modification procedures shall be used for applicatio ns requesting permit modifications listed in SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(e)(4)(i). Significant permit modifications shall meet all requirements of this Part 70, including those for applications, public participation, review by affected States, and review by EPA, as they apply to permit issuance and permit renewal.

P. DUTY TO COMPLY [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(6)(i)]

The permittee must comply with all of the conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance

constitutes a violation of the SC Pollution Co ntrol Act and/or the Federal Clean Air Act and is grounds for enfor action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or for denial of permit renewal application.

Q. INSPECTION AND ENTRY [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(c)(2)]

Upon pr esentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, the permittee shall allow the Department or an authorized representative to perform the following:

1. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a Part 70 source is located or emissi ons

- related activity is conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of the permit.

2. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of the permit.

3. Inspect any facilities, equipment ( including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit.

4. As authorized by the Act and/or the SC Pollution Control Act, sample or monitor at reasonable times substances or parameters fo r the purpose of assuring compliance with the permit or applicable requirements.

R. COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(c)(5)] (Revised 05/21/99)



### Consistent with SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(3), this permit contains compliance certificatio n, testing, monitoring, reporting, and record keeping requirements sufficient to assure compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. Any document (including reports) shall contain a certification by a responsible official or designee that meet s the requirements of SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.5(d).

The responsible official or designee shall certify, annually, compliance with the conditions of this permit. The compliance certification shall include the following:

1. The identification of each term or condition of the permit that is the basis of the certification.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 12 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### 2. The identification of the methods or means used for determining the compliance status with each term and condition during the certification period, and whether such methods

or means p rovide continuous or intermittent data.

3. The status of compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit for the period covered by the certification.

4. Such other facts as the Department may require to determine the compliance status of the

so urce.

5. All compliance certifications shall be submitted to the Administrator as well as to the Department.

The annual compliance certification shall be sent to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the South Carolina Department of Health and E nvironmental Control

- Bureau of Air Quality (SC

DHEC

- BAQ) at the following addresses:

US EPA, Region 4 SC DHEC

- BAQ

Air Enforcement Branch Technical Management Section 61 Forsyth Street 2600 Bull Street Atlanta, GA 30303 Columbia, SC 29201

S. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.5(c)(8)] (Revised 5/21/99)



### The permittee shall submit a compliance schedule that contains the following for all Part 70 sources that are not in compliance with all applicable rules:

1. A description of th e source's compliance status and where appropriate a compliance schedule with respect to all applicable requirements as follows:

(a) For applicable requirements with which the source is in compliance, a statement that during the permit term the source wil l continue to comply with such requirements.

(b) For applicable requirements that will become effective during the permit term, a statement that the source will meet such requirements on a timely basis, unless a more detailed schedule is expressly require d by the applicable requirement.

(c) A schedule of compliance for sources that are not in compliance with all applicable requirements at the time of permit issuance. This schedule shall include a narrative description of how the source will achieve compl iance, a schedule of remedial measures, including an enforceable sequence of actions with milestones, leading to compliance with all applicable requirements. This compliance schedule shall be at least as stringent as that contained in any judicial consent decree or administrative order to which the source is subject. Any such schedule of compliance shall be supplemental to, and shall not sanction noncompliance with, the applicable requirements on which it is based.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 13 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### 2. A schedule for submission of certifi ed progress reports no less frequently than every six (6) months for sources required to have a schedule of compliance to remedy a violation. Progress reports shall meet the requirements of SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(c)(4)(i) and (ii).

3. The compliance pl an content requirements specified in this paragraph shall apply and be included in the acid rain portion of a compliance plan for an affected source, except as specifically superseded by regulations promulgated under Title IV of the act with regard to

the schedule and method(s) the source will use to achieve compliance with acid rain

emissions limitations.

T. NEED TO HALT OR REDUCE ACTIVITY NOT A DEFENSE [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(6)(ii)]

It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement act ion that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit.

U. OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(e)(5)]

In accordance with SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(e) (5), a permitted facility is authorized to make changes within their facility without requiring a permit revision, if the changes are not modifications under Title I of the Act and the changes do not exceed the emissions allowable under this permit. The p ermitted facility shall provide the Administrator and the Department written notification as required by SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(e)(5) at least seven (7) days prior to such changes.

PART 4.0 FACILITY WIDE REQUIREMENTS

A. LIMITATIONS, STANDARDS, AND OT HER REQUIREMENTS

Table 4.1 contains summaries of facility wide limitations, standards, and other requirements.

TABLE 4.1 EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS

Pollutant Limit/Standard Regulation State Only Requirement Condition

Number

State New

Source Review As Specified in Attachment A SC 61

- 62.1, Section II (A) Yes 4.B.2

4.B.3

Toxic Air Pollutants As Specified in Attachment A SC 62.5, Std No. 8 Yes 4.B.3

Hazardous Air Pollution Comply with Regulation SC 61

- 62.4 No N/A

Open Burning Comply With Regulation SC 61

- 62.2 No N/A

Fugitive Emissions Comply With Regulation SC 61

- 62.6, Sec III No N/A

Ozone Depleting

Substances Specific To Subpart 40CFR82, Subpart F No 4.B.7

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 14 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 4.1 EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS

Pollutant Limit/Standard Regulation State Only Requirement Condition

Number

Asbestos Specific To Subpart 40CFR61.145 No 4.B.8



### The maximum allowable emission limits a bove are derived from the various Federal and State regulations that govern the operation of this type of facility. All applicable facility wide emission limits and corresponding regulations are listed above. Additional operating requirements, which

may be more stringent than those above, are contained in Part 5.0, Part 6.0, and Part 7.0 of this permit.

B. FACILITY WIDE CONDITIONS (Revised 11/13/98)

Condition

Number Condition

1. In accordance with SC Regulation 61

- 62.1, Section II, the permittee must comply with all applicable statutes and regulations of the United States and the State of South Carolina. This permit does not relieve the permittee from compliance with applicable local laws, ordinances, and regulations.

Condition

Number Condition

2. Air dispersion modeling (or other method) has demonstrated that this facility’s operation will not interfere with the attainment and maintenance of any state or federal standard. Any changes in the parameters used in the air dispersion modeling may requi re a review by the facility to determine continuing compliance with these standards. These potential changes include any decrease in stack height, decrease in stack velocity, increase in stack diameter, decrease in stack exit temperature, increase in buil ding height or building additions, increase in emission rates, decrease in distance between stack and property line, changes in vertical stack orientation, and installation of a rain cap that impedes vertical flow. Parameters that are not required in

the determination will not invalidate the demonstration if they are modified. The emission rates used in the determination are listed in Attachment A of this permit. Higher emission rates may be administratively incorporated into Attachment A of this permit provided a demonstration using these higher emission rates shows the attainment and maintenance of any state or federal standard or with any other applicable requirement. Variations from the input parameters in the demonstration shall not constitute a vio lation unless

the maximum allowable ambient concentrations identified in the standard are exceeded.

3. The owner/operator shall maintain this facility in compliance with the pollutant limitations in Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, and/or the emission rat es as listed in Attachment A of this Part 70 operating permit, whichever is more restrictive. This is a State Only enforceable requirement. Should the facility wish to increase the emission rates listed in Attachment A, it may do so by the administrative process specified in condition 4.B.2

4. A list of equipment which are considered insignificant pursuant to SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.5(c) has been submitted with your Title V application and reviewed by our staff. The list, including source descriptions

a nd citation for exemption, is summarized in Attachment B of the permit. Attachment B excludes those activities identified in Part A of the insignificant activities list. Written notification to the Bureau of Air Quality is required for the addition of an y new equipment which may meet the definition of insignificant or exempt as described above, excluding those sources listed in Part A of the insignificant activities list. (Revised 11/13/98)

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 15 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

Condition

Number Condition

5. In accordance with SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section II, (C)(3), for all sources not required to have continuous emissions monitors, in the event of any malfunction of air pollution control equipment or system, process upset or other equipment failure which results in discharges of air contaminants lasting for one hour or more and which are greater than those discharges described for normal operation in the permit application shall be reported to the local Environmental Quality Control (EQC) District office within twenty

- four (24) hours after the beginning of the occurr ence. The permittee shall also submit a written report within thirty (30) days of the occurrence. This report shall be submitted to the Manager of the Technical Management Section, Bureau of Air Quality (BAQ). The report shall contain as a minimum, the f ollowing: the identity of the emission unit and associated equipment where excess emissions occurred, the magnitude of excess emissions, the time and duration of excess emissions, the steps taken to remedy the malfunction and to prevent a recurrence,

docu mentation that control equipment and processes were at all times maintained and operated, to the maximum extent practicable, in a manner that was consistent with good practice for minimizing emissions. Such a report shall in no way serve to excuse, otherw ise justify, or in any manner affect any potential liability or enfor action resulting from the occurrence. This defines the Department’s definition of prompt in its relation to the degree of reporting as specified by SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(3)(iii)(b)

.

6. The owners or operators of Part 70 sources shall complete and submit emissions inventories as required consistent with the schedule approved pursuant to SC Regulation 61

- 62.1, Section III. This requirement notwithstanding, an emissions inventory ma y be required at any time in order to determine the compliance status of any facility.

Condition

Number Condition

7. The permittee shall comply with the standards for recycling and emissions reduction pursuant to 40CFR82, Subpart F, Protection of Strat ospheric Ozone, Recycling and Emissions Reduction, except as provided for motor vehicle air conditioners (MVAC’s) in Subpart B. If the permittee performs a service on motor (fleet)

vehicles that involves ozone

- depleting substance refrigerant in MVAC’s, th e permittee is subject to all applicable requirements of 40CFR82, Subpart B, Servicing of MVAC’s.

8. The permittee shall comply with the standards of performance for asbestos abatement operations pursuant to 40CFR61.145 and SC Regulation 61

- 86.1, includi ng, but not limited to, requirements governing training, licensing, notification, work practice, cleanup, and disposal.



### PART 5.0 EMISSION UNIT REQUIREMENTS

A. EMISSION UNIT DESCRIPTIONS

Table 5.1 is a description of the emission units located at this facility.

TABLE 5.1 EMISSION UNIT DESCRIPTIONS

Unit ID Unit Description Control Device Description

01 Quarry/Raw Material Handling Equipment None (Wet Process)

02 Kiln System Equipment Baghouses

03 Clinker Handling Equipment Baghouses

04 Finish Mill Equipment Baghouses

05 Cement Loadout Equipment Baghouses

06 Miscellaneous Sources None

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 16 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### B. CONTROL DEVICE DESCRIPTIONS

Tables 5.2 through 5.9 list descriptions of the air pollution control devices located at this facility.

TABLE 5.2 UNIT ID 02 (KI LN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICES)

Control

Device

ID Control Device

Description Install

(Modify)

Date Pollutant

Controlled Filter

Config Filter

Material Filter

Area (ft 2 ) Air/Cloth

Ratio Cleaning

Method Inlet

Flow

Rate (acfm)

CD01 Kiln Ba ghouse

Solios Model 2/15/73

(2/15/97) (1/1/04) PM Multi

Compartment Gore

- Tex 102,461 3.40 Pulse

Jet 368,000

CD33 Pulverized

Ash Silo

Dust Collector C&W Dust Systems

KR Series 2/15/98 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 750 6.0 Pulse

Jet 1,200

CD03 Marl Silo No .2

Roof Dust Collector

Fuller Model

#48

- 4

- 2000

Also controls

emissions

from some

Cement Loadout Equipment 2/15/73 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 2,000 6.5 Pulse

Air 13,000

CD09 Blend Silo

Roof Dust Collector

In

- House Fabrication 2/15/73

(3/15/97) PM Closed

Suction Poly

- Felt 1,850 8.11 Pulse

Jet 15,000

CD10 Kiln Feed Silo

Roof Dust Collector

Flow Air HEPA

Model #10

- 64

- 1047 2/15/73

(4/15/97) PM Closed

Suction Polyester 750 10.0 Pulse

Jet 4,200

CD35 Kiln Feed Elevator

Dust Collector 4/5/97 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 750 10.0 Pulse

Jet 2,000

CD36 Precalciner Coal

Mill

Dust Collector

Amerex Industries

Model #RP

- 12

- 294 12/1/97 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 4,650 4.3 Pulse

Jet 25,000

CD37 Precalciner Coal Bin

Dust Collector BACT Engineering

Model #BP

- 1612RC 12/1 /97 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 750 6.0 Pulse

Jet 1,000

CD39 Kiln Feed Bin

Dust Collector Micropoll Model

#05

- 17

- 005 3/5/97 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 1,850 8.0 Pulse

Air 2,370

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 17 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 5.3 UNIT ID 03 (CLINKER HANDLING SYSTEM EQUIPMENT AIR POLLUTION CO NTROL DEVICES)

Control

Device

ID Control Device

Description Install

(Modify)

Date Pollutant

Controlled Filter

Config Filter

Material Filter

Area (ft 2 ) Air/Cloth

Ratio Cleaning

Method Inlet

Flow

Rate (acfm)

CD11 Clinker Cooler Baghouse

Fuller Model

#156

- 12

- 19500 2/15/73 (3/5/97) PM Closed

Suction Polyester 750 6.0 Pulse

Jet 98,700

CD12 Clinker Belt Dust Collector 2/15/73 (2/15/98) (replaced 2006) PM Closed

Suction -- 1,536 3.26 Pulse

Jet 5,000

CD13 Clinker Silo Roof Dust

Collector No.2

Fuller Model

#48

- 4

- 2000 2/15/73 PM Closed

Suction Poly

- Felt 2,000 6.5 Pulse

Jet 13,000

CD04 Clinker Silo Roof Dust

Collector No.1

Fuller Model

#48

- 4

- 1500 2/15/73 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 1,500 6.67 Pulse

Jet 10,000

CD32 Clinker Shed Dust Collector

Flex

- Kleen Model WR TS

- 80 2004 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 848 3.9 Pulse

Jet 3,000

CD14 Clinker Silo No.1

Belt Transfer Dust Collector

Dalamatic Model

DLM V30/15 8/15/93 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 315 9.52 Pulse

Jet 3,000

CD15 Clinker Silo No.2

Belt Transfer Dust Collector

Dalamatic Model

DLM V30/15 8/15/93 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 315 9.52 Pulse

Jet 3,000

CD16 Clinker Silo No.21

Belt Transfer Dust Collector

Dalamatic Model

DLM V30/15 8/15/93 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 315 9.52 Pulse

Jet 3,000

CD17 Clinker Silo No.2 2

Belt Transfer Dust Collector

Dalamatic Model

DLM V30/15 8/15/93 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 315 9.52 Pulse

Jet 3,000

CD07 Clinker Silo No.31

Belt Transfer

Dust Collector

Dalamatic Model

DLM V30/15 8/15/93 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 315 9.52 Pulse

Je t 3,000

CD05 Clinker Silo No.32

Belt Transfer Dust Collector

Dalamatic Model

DLM V30/15 8/15/93 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 315 9.52 Pulse

Jet 3,000

CD18 Outside Clinker No.1

Transfer Dust Collector

Dalamatic Model

DLM V30/15 8/15/93 PM Closed

Suction P olyester 315 9.52 Pulse

Jet 3,000

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 18 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 5.4 UNIT ID 04 (FINISH MILL SYSTEM EQUIPMENT AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE )

Control

Device

ID Control Device

Description Install

(Modify)

Date Pollutant

Controlled Filter

Config Filter

Material Filter

Area (ft 2 ) Air/Cloth

Ratio Cleaning

Method Inlet

Flow

Rate (acfm)

CD38 Finish Mill No.3

High Efficiency

Dust Collector

Flow Air HEPA

Model #10

- 64

- 543 2/15/97 PM Closed

Suction Surfcoat Polyester 17,200 3.49 Pulse

Jet 60,000

CD18 Outside Clinker No.1

Transfer

Dust Collector

Dalamatic DLM

V30/15 8/15/93 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 315 9.52 Pulse

Jet 3,000

CD08 Finish Mill No.3

Dust Collector

Fuller Model

#48

- 7

- 3500 2/15/73

(2/15/97) PM Closed

Suction Surfcoat Polyester 3,500 5.14 Pulse

Jet 18,000

N/A Stilling Shed 2002 PM N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

CD19 Outside Clinker No.2

Transfer

Dust Collector

Dalamatic DLM

V30/15 8/15/93 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 315 9.52 Pulse

Jet 3,000

CD20 Finish Mill No.1

Dust Collector

Fuller Model

#48

- 9

- 4500 2/15/73 PM Closed

Suction P oly

- Felt 4,650 4.3 Pulse

Air 20,000

CD21 Finish Mill No.1

Nuisance

Dust Collector

Fuller Model

#24

- 3

- 1000 5/1/86 PM Closed

Suction Poly

- Felt 1,050 5.71 Pulse

Jet 6,000

CD22 Finish Mill No.2

Dust Collector

Fuller Model

#48

- 9

- 4500 2/15/73 PM Closed

Suction Poly

- Felt 4,650 4.3 Pulse

Air 20,000

CD23 Finish Mill No.2

Nuisance

Dust Collector

Fuller Model

#24

- 3

- 750 5/1/86 PM Closed

Suction Poly

- Felt 750 6.0 Pulse

Air 4,500

CD24 Finish Mill No.2

High Efficiency

Dust Collector

Staclean Model

#928

- 14

- ADR 2/1/87 P M Closed

Suction Surfcoat Polyester 17,200 3.49 Pulse

Jet 60,000

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 19 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 5.5 UNIT ID 05 ( CEMENT LOADOUT SYSTEM EQUIPMENT AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICES)

Control

Device

ID Control Device

Description Install

(Modify)

Date Pollutant

Controlled Filter

Conf ig Filter

Material Filter

Area (ft 2 ) Air/Cloth

Ratio Cleaning

Method Inlet

Flow

Rate (acfm)

CD25A Cement Silo Roof

Dust Collector No.1

Fuller Model

#78

- 3

- 2438 2/15/73 PM Closed

Suction Poly

- Felt 2,450 6.12 Pulse

Air 15,000

CD30/31B Marl Silo

No.12 Loado ut
Dust Collector Silo

D.C. No.2 Torrit Cartridge 6/1/96 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 3,250 7.0 Pulse

Air 10,000

CD25C/25D Masonry Bagging

2 Dust Collectors

Staclean Model

#168

- 12

- AD 4/15/94

(6/1/96) PM Closed

Suction Polyester 1,000 6.0 Pulse

Jet 7,600

CD26/27 Cement Loadout No.1

Dust Collector

Midwest International

MV Series Vaculoader 7/15/93 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 150 10.2 Pulse

Jet 1,950

CD28/29 Cement Loadout No.2

Dust Collector

Midwest International

MV Series Vaculoader 7/15/93 PM Closed

Suct ion Polyester 150 10.2 Pulse

Jet 1,950

CD30/31A Cement Loadout No.3

Dust Collector

Midwest International

MV Series Vaculoader 7/15/93 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 150 10.2 Pulse

Jet 1,950

CD40 Bagged Cement

Cleaning Station IAC (45 Series) 1/5/97 PM Close d

Suction Polyester 312 9.5 Pulse

Jet 3,000

CD03 Marl Silo No.2

Roof Dust Collector

Fuller Model

#48

- 4

- 2000

Also controls

emissions from some Kiln System Equipment 2/15/73 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 2,000 6.5 Pulse

Air 13,200

CD42 800 acfm Pulse Jet

Du st Collector,

associated with the

Marl Silo No. 12 2006 PM Closed

Suction Polyester 270 3.0 Pulse Jet 800

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 20 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### C. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIONS

A description of the equipment located at this facility is provided in the following tables:

TABLE 5.6 UNIT ID 01 (Q UARRY/RAW MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIONS)

Equip

ID Equipment Description Equipment

Manufacture

Date Install

(Modify)

Date Design

Capacity Control

Device

ID Stack

ID

1054000 MMD Quarry Crusher

(Crushes wet quarried marl) 2/15/98 1998 (2004) 140 0 tph None NP03

1002000 B2 Marl Conveyor

(Transports wet quarried marl) 4/15/95 1995 (2004) 1400 tph None NP04

1001000 Stamler Feeder

(Reclaim hopper for wet quarried marl) 2/15/73 1973 (2004) 335 tph None NP07

4114000 Clay Box Feeder System

(Feeds cla y to raw mill feed belt) 2/15/98 1998 100 tons None NP15

4122010 Ash Box Feeder System

(Feeds ash to raw mill feed belt) 2/15/98 1998 110 tons None NP16

4104000

4106000 Marl Box Feeder System

(Feeds marl to raw mill feed belt) 2/15/98 1998 500 tons None NP08

4124010 Iron Ore Feeder System

(Feeds iron ore to raw mill feed belt) 2/15/98 1998 100 tons None NP17

4101000 Old Quarry Crusher (Stamler Feeder) 2/15/73 1973 (2004) 1,400 tph None NP01

1005000 B5 Mobile Belt Conveyor

(Transports wet quarried marl) 2/15/73 1973 (2004) 1,400 tph None NP04

1006000 B6 Belt Conveyor 2/15/73 1973 1,400 tph None NP04

1008000 Marl Conveyor/Radial Stacker

(Stockpiles wet quarried marl) 2/15/73 1973 1,400 tph None NP05

1004000 B4 Mobile Belt Conveyor 2004 2004 1,400 tph N one NP04

HRL213HO05 Raw Material Feed System 5

-- Material Hopper 2006 2006 Iron 8 TPH;

other

material 20

TPH None Fugitive

HRL213BC03 Raw Material Feed System 5

-- Conveyor

Belt 2006 2006 None Fugitive

HRL213WF01 Raw Material Feed System 5

-- Weigh

Fe eder 2006 2006 None Fugitive

TABLE 5.7 UNIT ID 02 (KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIONS)

Equip

ID Equipment Description Install (Modify)

Date Design

Capacity Control

Device

ID Stack

ID

11309000

11311000 2 Coal Reclaim Hoppers

(Store crushed undried coa l) 6/1/77 25 tph None NP37

11310000 Reclaim Belt Conveyor

to Coal Day Tank (Transports dry pulverized coal) 6/1/77 25 tph None NP37

11316000 South Coal Day Tank

(Stores pulverized coal for front end firing) 6/1/77 43 tons None NP37

11325000 Pre

- Cal Coal Day Tank

(Stores pulverized coal for front end firing) 6/1/77 100 tons None NP37

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 21 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

11321000 Coal Cyclone Dust Collector

Collects heavy dust particles from Dust Exhaust

for Inclusion in coal supply (Part of process and not a control device) 6/1/77 25,000 ds cfm None NP37

TABLE 5.8 UNIT ID 02 (KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIONS)

Equip

ID Equipment Description Install (Modify)

Date Design

Capacity Control

Device

ID Stack

ID

11323000 Coal Day Tank Screw Conveyor

(Transports pulverized dry coal) 6/1/77 25 tph None NP37

11324000 Pre

- Cal Coal Day Tank Belt Conveyor

(Transports pulverized dry coal) 6/1/77 25 tph None NP37

11317000 672 Kiln Coal Mill Feed Conveyor

(Transports crushed, undried coal) 6/1/77 25 tph None NP37

11320000 672 Kiln Coal Mill

(Pulverizes Dry Coal for Crusher Air Heater) 6/1/77 25 tph None NP37

11301000 Coal Transfer from C32 Belt

(Transports uncrushed and undried coal) 6/1/77 25 tph None NP37

5001000 Blend Silo

(Blends/homogenizes raw meal) 2/15/73 2,090 tons CD09 NP37

4172000 Raw Mea l FK Pump

(Transports raw meal to the blend silo) 2/15/73 250 tph CD09 CD09

4172020 Pneumatic Transfer Piping to Blend Silo

(Transports raw meal to the blend silo) 2/15/73 250 tph CD09 CD09

5003010 Blend Silo Airslides

(Transports raw meal into the ble nd system) 2/15/73 250 tph CD09 CD09

6101000 Four Stage Preheater

(Preheat and partially calcinates kiln feed prior to Rotary Kiln and includes meal curtain) 2/15/98 (2005) 220 tph CD01 EP01

6101020 Precalciner

(Calcinates kiln feed prior to entering Rot ary Kiln) 2/15/98 220 tph CD01 EP01

11400000 Tire Fuel System

(Delivers whole tires to kiln riser duct) 2/15/90 3.0 tph CD01 EP01

11057000 Kiln Gas

- Oil Burner System

(Delivers No.2 gas/fuel oil to Rotary Kiln) 2/15/73 250,000 ft 3 /hr CD01 EP01

6105000 R otary Kiln

(Converts kiln feed to clinker by calcinations and sintering) 2/15/73 160 tph CD01 EP01

6129030 2 Clinker Cooler Product Recovery Cyclones

(Collects clinker dust particles for recycling back into the process. Part of process and not a control d evice) 2/15/73 80,000 ft 3 /min

@ 700 o F CD01 EP01

4140000 Vertical Raw Mill System

(Grinds and dries raw materials into meal) 2/15/98 272 tph

Raw Material CD01 EP01

4160000 4 Vertical Raw Mill Cyclones

(Removes product from Vertical Raw Mill) (Part of process and not a control device) 2/15/98 330,000 ft 3 /min

@ 220 o F CD01 EP01

4156000 Auxiliary Air Heater

(Provides additional heat to preheater) 2/15/73 60E+06Btu/hr CD01 EP01

216BC01 VRM Recirc Lower Enclosed Conveyor 2005 150 tph CD01 EP01

216BE01 VR M Reject Enclosed Elevator 2005 150 tph CD01 EP01

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 22 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

216BC02 VRM Recirc Upper Enclosed Conveyor 2005 150 tph CD01 EP01

4127000 Pulverized Ash Silo (Stores pulverized ash) 2/15/98 200 tons CD33 EP33

4003040 Marl Silo No.2 (Stores dry marl) 2/15/73 500 tons CD03 EP03

11303000 Coal Crusher Tower (Crushes coal) 6/1/77 200 tph None NP35

TABLE 5.9 UNIT ID 02 (KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIONS)

Equip

ID Equipment Description Install (Modify)

Date Design

Capacity Control

Device

ID Stack

ID

11303010 Coal Grizz ly (Crushes coal) 6/1/77 200 tph None NP35

11307000 Radial Stacker Belt

(Stockpiles crushed undried coal) 6/1/77 200 tph None NP35

4130000 Raw Mill Feed Belt Conveyor

(Transports raw materials to raw mill) 2/15/98 440 tph None NP18

4132000 Vertical Ra w Mill Feed Bin

(Feeds raw material into raw mill) 2/15/98 60 tons None NP20

5019000 Kiln Feed Elevator

(Transports kiln feed into kiln system) 2/15/97 272 tph

Raw Material CD35 EP35

6200000 Precalciner Coal Mill

(Pulverizes dry crushed coal) 2/15/98 9.0 tph CD36 EP36

6212000 Precalciner Coal Bin

(Staging bin for pulverized coal) 2/15/98 30 tons CD37 EP37

5018000 Kiln Feed Bin (Staging bin for kiln feed) 2/15/97 50 tons CD39 EP39

3028000 Rail Road Coal Unloading Hopper 6/1/77 200 tph None

3032000 925’ Coal Inclined Belt Conveyor 6/1/77 200 tph None

5002000 Kiln Feed Silo (Stores kiln feed) 2/15/97 5,750 tons CD10 EP10

5026000 Raw Meal CP Transfer Pump

(Transports kiln feed into the kiln system) 2/15/73 272 tph

Raw Material CD10 EP10

5014090 Pn eumatic Transfer Piping to Kiln Feed Silo

(Transports kiln feed into the kiln silo) 2/15/73 272 tph

Raw Material CD10 EP10

5016030 Kiln Feed Silo Airslides

(Transports kiln feed into the kiln system) 2/15/73 272 tph

Raw Material CD10 EP10

TABLE 5.10 UNI T ID 03 (CLINKER HANDLING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIONS)

Equip

ID Equipment Description Install (Modify)

Date Design

Capacity Control

Device

ID Stack

ID

6115000 Clinker Cooler

(Cools clinker produced by the Rotary Kiln) 2/15/73 (2/15/97) 160 tph CD11 EP11

6125 000 Clinker Cooler Heat Exchanger

(Removes excess heat from clinker cooler exhaust) 6/1/88 160 tph CD11 EP11

6125130 Clinker Cooler Screw Conveyors

(Transports clinker dust from heat exchanger) 6/1/88 160 tph CD11 EP11

6133000 Fredenhagen Clinker Conveyo r

(Transports cooled clinker to clinker silo) 2/15/73 (2/15/93) 160 tph CD12 EP12

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 23 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

6138000

6139000

6140000 3 Clinker Elevators

(Transports clinker to clinker silos) 2/15/73 (2/15/98) 160 tph CD12 EP12

7003010 Clinker Silo No.1 (Stores Clinker) 2/15/73 4, 000 tons CD13 EP13

7005010 Clinker Silo No.2 (Stores Clinker) 2/15/73 4,000 tons CD13 EP13

TABLE 5.11 UNIT ID 03 (CLINKER HANDLING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIONS)

Equip

ID Equipment Description Install (Modify)

Date Design

Capacity Control

Device

ID Stack

ID

7103010 Clinker Silo No.21 (Stores Clinker) 2/15/73 4,000 tons CD13 EP13

7105010 Clinker Silo No.22 (Stores Clinker) 2/15/73 4,000 tons CD13 EP13

4001020 Clinker Silo No.31 (Stores Clinker) 2/15/73 3,000 tons CD04 EP04

4002020 Clinker Silo No.32 (Store s Clinker) 2/15/73 4,000 tons CD04 EP04

7003000 Clinker Silo No.1 Belt Transfer Feed

(Transports clinker to Finish Mill No.1) 2/15/73 75 tph CD14 EP14

7005000 Clinker Silo No.2 Belt Transfer Feed

(Transports clinker to Finish Mill No.2) 2/15/73 75 tph CD 15 EP15

7103000 Clinker Silo No.21 Belt Transfer Feed

(Transports clinker to Finish Mill No.2) 2/15/73 75 tph CD16 EP16

7105000 Clinker Silo No.22 Belt Transfer Feed

(Transports clinker to Finish Mill No.2) 2/15/73 75 tph CD17 EP17

4001000 Clinker Silo No.31 Belt Transfer Feed

(Transports clinker to Finish Mill No.3) 2/15/73 (2/15/98) 75 tph CD07 EP07

4002000 Clinker Silo No.32 Belt Transfer Feed

(Transports clinker to Finish Mill No.3) 2/15/73 (2/15/98) 75 tph CD05 EP05

6134000 Reclaim Crusher

(Crushe s reclaim material from storage to clinker silos) 2/15/73 10 tph CD18 NP22

6156000 Fringe Clinker Silo (Stores fringe clinker) 2/15/73 1,592 tons None NP23

7101000 Fringe Clinker Silo Belt Transfer Feed

(Transports fringe clinker to Finish Mill No.1) 2/1 5/73 75 tons None NP23

TABLE 5.12 UNIT ID 04 (FINISH MILL EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIONS)

Equip

ID Equipment Description Install (Modify)

Date Design

Capacity Control

Device

ID Stack

ID

2126000 Gypsum Silo (Stores gypsum) 2/15/73 800 tph None NP29

2126000 Gyp sum Silo (Stores gypsum) 2/15/73 (2/15/98) 300 tph None NP29

7007000 Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.1

(Transports gypsum to Finish Mill No.1) 2/15/73 10 tph None NP30

7107000 Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.2

(Transports gypsum to Finish Mill No.2) 2/15/73 10 tph None NP24

4007000 Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.3

(Transports gypsum to Finish Mill No.3) 2/15/98 10 tph None NP25

7007010 Synthetic Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.1

(Transports synthetic gypsum to Finish Mill No.1) 8/15/90 10 tph N one NP32

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 24 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 5.13 UNIT ID 04 (FINISH MILL EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIONS)

Equip

ID Equipment Description Install (Modify)

Date Design

Capacity Control

Device

ID Stack

ID

7107010 Synthetic Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.2

(Transports synthetic gypsum to Fi nish Mill No.2) 8/15/90 10 tph None NP33

4008000 Synthetic Gypsum Hopper/Feed Belt Transfer No.3

(Transports synthetic gypsum to Finish Mill No.3) 1/4/01 10 tph None NP34

7014000 Finish Mill No.1

(Grinds clinker and gypsum into cement) 2/15/73 (8/15/86) 65 tph CD21 EP21

7041000 No.1 Mill Cement FK Pump (Transports cement to silos) 2/15/73 65 tph CD21 EP21

7037000 No.1 Mill Cement After Cooler (Cools cement) 2/15/73 65 tph CD21 EP21

7021000 No.1 Mill Material Transfer

(Transports cement in mill circu it) 2/15/73 65 tph CD21 EP21

7029000 No.1 Mill Separator (Classifies cement) 2/15/73 65 tph CD20 EP20

7019000 Finish Mill No.1 Bucket Elevator 2/15/73 65 tph CD20 EP20

7114000 Finish Mill No.2

(Grinds clinker and gypsum into cement) 2/15/73 (8/15/86) 6 5 tph CD22 EP22

7141000 No.2 Mill Cement FK Pump

(Transports cement to cement silos) 2/15/73 65 tph CD22 EP22

7137000 No.2 Mill Cement After Cooler (Cools cement) 2/15/73 65 tph CD22 EP22

7119000 Finish Mill No.2 Bucket Elevator 2/15/73 65 tph CD22 EP22

7123000 No.2 High Efficiency Separator (Classifies cement) 8/15/86 65 tph CD24 EP24

7118000 No.2 Material Transfer

(Transports cement in mill circuit) 2/15/73 65 tph CD23 EP23

4014000 Finish Mill No.3

(Grinds clinker and gypsum into cement) 2/15/98 60 tph CD08 EP08

4036000 No.3 Mill Cement FK Pump

(Transports cement to cement silos) 2/15/98 60 tph CD08 EP08

4050000 No.3 Material Transfer

(Transports cement in mill circuit) 2/15/98 60 tph CD08 EP08

4020000 2 Finish Mill No.3 Bucket Elevators 2/1 5/98 60 tph CD08 EP08

4052000 No.3 High Efficiency Separator (Classifies cement) 2/15/98 60 tph CD38 EP38

7006000 Outside Clinker No.1/Belt Transfer

(Transport outside clinker to Finish Mill No.1) 2/15/73 45 tph CD18 EP18

7106000 Outside Clinker No.2/Be lt Transfer

(Transport outside clinker to Finish Mill No.2) 2/15/73 45 tph CD19 EP19

7006010

7106010 Clinker Reclaim Bin 2/15/73 45 tph Shed EP18

EP19

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 25 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 5.14 UNIT ID 05 (CEMENT LOADOUT EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIONS)

Equip

ID Equipment Description Insta ll (Modify)

Date Design

Capacity Control

Device

ID Stack

ID

8103000 Marl Silo No.3

(Stores ground marl for bagged masonry) 2/15/73 (9/1/94) 250 tons CD03 EP03

2126000 Marl Fringe Bin (Stores fringe marl) 2/15/73 1,076 tons CD03 EP03

8112000 Marl Silo No .12

(Stores ground marl for bagged masonry) 2/15/73 (2/15/98) 925 tons CD41/CD42 EP41/

EP42

8109000 Marl Silo No.4

(Stores ground marl for bagged masonry) 9/1/94 175 tons CD41 EP41

8011000 Cement Loadout No.3

(Loadout for Cement Silos No.1, No.2 and No. 3) 2/15/98 65 tph CD30/31B EP26

8017000 Cement Silos Nos. 1

- 11

(Each silo used for cement storage) 2/15/73 35,000 tons (Total) CD25A EP25

8001000 Cement Silo No.13 (Silo used for cement storage) 2/15/73 1,185 tons CD25A EP25

4036040

7141030 Pneumatic Tr ansfer Piping to Cement Silos

(Transports cement to cement silos) 2/15/73 130 tph CD25A EP25

8011010 Cement Silo Aeration Units

(Conditions cement for transport) 2/15/73 12.0 psig CD25A EP25

8214000 Bagged Cement Cleaning Station

(Removes dust from bag ged cement and masonry) 2/15/73 340 tph CD40 EP40

8125000 Cement Packhouse Airslide

(Transports cement and ground marl to packhouse) 9/1/94 65 tph CD25C/25D EP25

8131000 Mixer (Mixes cement and ground marl) 9/1/94 65 tph CD25C/25D EP25

8135000 Mixer Di scharge Hopper

(Transports portland and masonry cement) 9/1/94 65 tph CD25C/25D EP25

8142010 Packer Screw Conveyor

(Transports portland and masonry cement) 9/1/94 65 tph CD25C/25D EP25

8137000 Packer Elevator

(Transports portland and masonry cement) 9/1 /94 65 tph CD25C/25D EP25

8138000 2 Vibrating Screens

(Each Screens portland and masonry cement) 9/1/94 65 tph CD25C/25D EP25

8139000 Packer Hopper (Stores portland and masonry cement) 9/1/94 65 tph CD25C/25D EP25

8141000 Haver Packer (Bags portland an d masonry cement) 9/1/94 65 tph CD25C/25D EP25

8142020 Waste Screw Conveyor

(Transports portland and masonry cement) 9/1/94 65 tph CD25C/25D EP25

8011000 North Scale Cement Loading System

(Weighs and dispenses cement to bulk truck) 2/15/73 340 tph CD26/2 7 EP26/27

8011040 Airslide System to North Scale Loading Spout

(Transports cement to truck) 2/15/73 340 tph CD26/27 EP26/27

8011060 North Scale Loading Spout (Truck)

(Transports cement to truck) 2/15/73 340 tph CD26/27 EP26/27

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 26 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 5.15 UNIT ID 05 ( CEMENT LOADOUT EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIONS)

Equip

ID Equipment Description Install (Modify)

Date Design

Capacity Control

Device

ID Stack

ID

8017000 Center Scale Loading System

(Weighs and dispenses cement to bulk truck) 2/15/73 340 tph CD28/29 EP28/29

801704 0 Airslide System to Center Scale Loading Spout

(Transports cement to truck) 2/15/73 340 tph CD28/29 EP28/29

8017090 Center Scale Loading Spout(Truck

- Rail)

(Transports cement to truck) 2/15/73 340 tph CD28/29 EP28/29

8023000 South Scale Cement Loading Sy stem

(Weighs and dispenses cement to bulk truck) 2/15/73 340 tph CD30/31A EP30/31

8023040 Airslide System to South Scale Loading Spout

(Transports cement to truck) 2/15/73 340 tph CD30/31A EP30/31

8023090 South Scale Loading Spout(Truck

- Rail)

(Transport s cement to truck) 2/15/73 340 tph CD30/31A EP30/31

TABLE 5.16 UNIT ID 06 (MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES DESCRIPTIONS)

Equip

ID Equipment Description Install (Modify)

Date Design

Capacity Control

Device

ID Stack

ID

6175000 Storage A Frame

(Covered outside stor age area used to store clinker, raw materials or coal) 2/15/73 55,000 tons None NP39



### D. EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS

Tables 5.17 through 5.26 contain summaries of the emission unit emission limits and standards.

TABLE 5.17 EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARD S (UNIT ID 01 QUARRY/RAW MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT) Equip

ID Pollutant/Standard Limit Reference

Method Regulation State Only Condition

Number

1002000

1005000

1004000 CONVEYOR

TRANSFER POINT

VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from B2 Marl Conveyor B5 Marl Conveyor

B4 Mobile Belt Conveyor 10% Opacity

from Each conveyor transfer point when conveying

unsaturated

materials Method 9

and 40CFR60.675(c) 40CFR60.11(b) 40CFR60.672(b) No 5.E.1(a)

1002000

1005000

1004000 CONVEYOR

TRANSFER POINT

VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from

B2 Marl Conveyor B5 Marl Conveyor B4 Mobile Belt Conveyor No Visible

Emissions

from Each conveyor transfer point when conveying

saturated materials Method 22 40CFR60.672(h) No 5.E.1(a)

4114000

4122010

4104000

4106000

4124010 VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from Clay Box F eeder System Ash Box Feeder System Marl Box Feeder System Iron Ore Box Feeder System 10% Opacity

Each Method 9 40CFR63.1348 No 5.E.1(b)

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 27 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 5.18 EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT ID 01 QUARRY/RAW MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT) Equip

ID Pollutant/Stan dard Limit Reference

Method Regulation State Only Condition

Number

1054000 FUGITIVE EMISSIONS

from MMD Quarry Crusher 15% Opacity Method 9

and 40CFR60.675(c) 40CFR60.11(b) 40CFR60.672(c) No 5.E.1(c)

N/A VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from Marl Ripping

Marl Transfer Loadout No.1 Marl Stockpile Clay Stockpile Iron Ore Stockpile Ash Stockpile Silica Stockpile Calcium Stockpile Sand Stockpile 20% Opacity

Each Method 9 SC Regulation 61

- 62.5

Standard 4 Section IX(B) No 5.E.1(d)

4101000 VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from Old Quarry C rusher 20% Opacity Method 9 SC Regulation 61

- 62.5

Standard 4 Section IX(B) No 5.E.1(d)

1008000 CONVEYOR

TRANSFER POINT

VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from Marl Conveyor/Radial

Stacker 40% Opacity

From Each

Transfer Point Method 9 SC Regulation 61

- 62.5

Standard 4

Sect ion IX(A) No 5.E.1(e)

1001000 VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from

Stamler Feeder 40% Opacity Method 9 SC Regulation 61

- 62.5

Standard 4 Section IX(A) No 5.E.1(f)

HRL213HO05; HRL213BC03;

HRL213WF01 Opacity 20% Method 9 SC Regulation 61

- 62.5, Standard 4, Section IX No 5.E.1(g)

TABLE 5.19 EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT ID 02 KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT)

Equip

ID Pollutant/Standard Limit Reference

Method Regulation State Only Condition

Number

4130000

4132000 TRANSFER POINT

VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from

Raw Mill Feed Belt Con veyor Kiln Feed Elevator 10% Opacity

From Each

Transfer

Point Method 9 40CFR63.1348 No 5.E.2(a)

6101000

6101020

11400000

11057000

6105000

6129030

4140000

4160000

4156000 PM EMISSIONS

from

Main Kiln Stack See

Condition Method 5 SC Regulation 61

- 62.5

Sectio n IV No 5.E.2(b)

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 28 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

4132000 VISIBLE EMISSIONS

From

Vertical Raw Mill Feed Bin 10% Opacity Method 9 40CFR63.1348 No 5.E.2(c)

TABLE 5.20 EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT ID 02 KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT)

Equip

ID Pollutant/Standard Limit Reference

Method Regu lation State Only Condition

Number

11303000

11303010

11309000

11311000

11316000

11325000

11321000

11320000

6200000

6212000

3028000

3032000 VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from

Coal Crusher Tower Coal Grizzley 2 Coal Reclaim Hoppers South Coal Day Tank

Pre

- Cal Coal Day Tank Coal Cyclone Dust Collector

672 Kiln Coal Mill

Precalciner Coal Mill

Precalciner Coal Bin Rail Road Coal Unloading Hopper

925’ Coal Inclined Belt Conv 20% Opacity

Each Method 9 40CFR60.252(c) No 5.E.2(d)

11307000

11310000

11323000

11324000

11317000

1 1301000 CONVEYOR TRANSFER POINT

VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from

Radial Stacker Belt Reclaim Belt Conveyor to Coal Day Tank Coal Day Tank Screw Conveyor

Pre

- Cal Coal Day Tank Belt Conveyor 672 Kiln Coal Mill Feed Conveyor

Coal Transfer from C32 Belt 20% Opacity

From Each

Transfer

Point Method 9 40CFR60.252(c) No 5.E.2(e)

4127000

4003040

5001000

4172000

5002000

5026000

5014090

5003010

5002000

4172000

5014090

5016030

5018000 VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from

Pulverized Ash Silo

Marl Silo No.2

Blend Silo Raw Meal FK Pump

Pneumati c Transfer Piping to Blend Silo

Blend Silo Airslides

Kiln Feed Silo Raw Meal CP Transfer Pump Pneumatic Transfer Piping to Kiln Feed Silo

Kiln Feed Silo Airslides

Kiln Feed Bin 10% Opacity

Each Method 9 40CFR63.1348 No 5.E.2(f)

6105000 VISIBLE EMISSIONS

f rom Main Kiln Stack 20% Opacity Method 9 SC Regulation 61

- 62.5

Section IV

and 40CFR63.1343(b) No 5.E.2(g)

6105000 METAL AND HCl EMISSIONS

from Rotary Kiln See

Condition BAQ

Approved

Method SC Regulation 61

- 62.5

Standard 3 Section III(A) Yes 5.E.2(h)

6105 000

6200000 MAXIMUM PERCENT

EXITING KILN GAS VOLUME

from Rotary Kiln

Precalciner Coal Mill See

Condition BAQ

Approved

Method SC Regulation 61

- 62.5

Standard 7

Avoidance No 5.E.2(i)

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 29 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 5.21 EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT ID 02 KILN SYSTEM EQUIP MENT)

Equip

ID Pollutant/Standard Limit Reference

Method Regulation State Only Condition

Number

6105000

6200000 CRITERIA POLLUTANT

EMISSIONS (SO 2 , NO

x CO)

from Rotary Kiln

Precalciner Coal Mill See Condition BAQ Approved

Method SC Regulation 61

- 62.5

Sta ndard 7

Avoidance No 5.E.2(j)

6105000 Rotary Kiln

Dioxin/Furan Emissions See Condition Method 23 40CFR63.1343(b)(3) No 5.E.2(k)

6105000 Preheater/Precalciner Kiln #1 and

Precalciner Coal Mill; NMVOC emissions 0.55 lb

NMVOC/ton

clinker 18 and 25A

for NMVO C SC Regulation 61

- 62.5,

Standard 7 No 5.E.2 (l)

TABLE 5.22 EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT ID 03 CLINKER HANDLING EQUIPMENT)

Equip

ID Pollutant/Standard Limit Reference

Method Regulation State Only Condition

Number

6115000 Clinker Cooler PM Emissi ons 0.10 lb/ton dry feed (0.050 kg/Mg) Method 5 40CFR63.1345(a)(1) No 5.E.3(a)

6115000

6125000

7003010

7005010

7103010

7105010

4001020

4002020

6134000

6156000 VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from

Clinker Cooler Clinker Cooler Heat Exchanger

Clinker Silo No.1

Clinker Si lo No.2

Clinker Silo No.21

Clinker Silo No.22

Clinker Silo No.31

Clinker Silo No.32

Reclaim Crusher Fringe Clinker Silo 10% Opacity

Each Method 9 40CFR63.1345(a)(2)

and

40CFR63.1348 No 5.E.3(b)

6125130

6133000

6138000

6139000

6140000

7003000

7005000

71030 00

7105000

4001000

4002000

7101000 TRANSFER POINT

VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from Clinker Cooler Screw Conveyors Fredenhagen Clinker Conveyor

3 Clinker Elevators

Clinker Silo No.1 Belt Transfer Feed

Clinker Silo No.2 Belt Transfer Feed

Clinker Silo No.21 Belt Trans fer Feed

Clinker Silo No.22 Belt Transfer Feed

Clinker Silo No.31 Belt Transfer Feed

Clinker Silo No.32 Belt Transfer Feed Fringe Clinker Silo Belt Transfer Feed 10% Opacity

From

Each

Transfer Point Method 9 40CFR63.1348 No 5.E.3(c)

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 30 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 5.23 EM ISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT ID 04 FINISH MILL SYSTEM EQUIPMENT)

Equip

ID Pollutant/Standard Limit Reference

Method Regulation State Only Condition

Number

2126000

7014000

7041000

7037000

7021000

7029000

7019000

7114000

7141000

7137000

7119000

712300 0

7118000

4014000

4036000

4050000

4020000

4052000 VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from 2 Gypsum Silos, Finish Mill No.1 Finish Mill No.2, No.1 Mill Cement FK Pump

No.1 Mill Separator

No.1 Mill Material Transfer

Finish Mill No.1 Bucket Elevator No.2 Mill Cement FK Pump

No.2 Mill Cement After Cooler

Finish Mill No.2 Bucket Elevator No.2 High Efficiency Separator

No.2 Material Transfer Finish Mill No.3, No.3 Mill Cement FK Pump

No.3 Material Transfer

2 Finish Mill No.3 Bucket Elevators No.3 High Efficiency Separator

Clin ker Reclaim Hopper 10% Opacity

Each Method 9 40CFR63.1347

and

40CFR63.1348 No 5.E.4(a)

7007000

7107000

4007000

7007010

7107010

4008000

7006000

7106000 CONVEYOR TRANSFER POINT

VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.1 Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.2 Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.3 Synthetic Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.1 Synthetic Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.2 Synthetic Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.3

Outside Clinker No.1/Belt Transfer

Outside Clinker No.2/Belt Transf er 10%

Opacity

From

Each

Transfer

Point Method 9 40CFR63.1348 No 5.E.4(b)

6133000 Opacity 20% Method 9 SC Regulation 61

- 62.5, Standard 4,

Section IX No 5.E.4(c)

TABLE 5.24 EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT ID 05 CEMENT LOADOUT EQUIPMENT)

Equip

ID Po llutant/Standard Limit Reference

Method Regulation State Only Condition

Number

8142010

8142020

8137000 TRANSFER POINT

VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from Packer Screw Conveyor Waste Screw Conveyor

Packer Elevator 10% Opacity

From

Each

Transfer

Point Method 9 40CFR63. 1348 No 5.E.5(a)

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 31 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 5.25 EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT ID 05 CEMENT LOADOUT EQUIPMENT)

Equip

ID Pollutant/Standard Limit Reference

Method Regulation State Only Condition

Number

8017000

8001000

4036040

7141030

8011010

8125000

8131000

8135 000

8138000

8139000

8141000

8011000

8011040

8011060

8017000

8017040

8017090

8023000

8023040

8023090

8103000

2126000

8112000

8109000

8011000

8214000 VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from

Cement Silos Nos. 1

- 11 and Cement Silo No.13 Pneumatic Transfer Piping to Cement Silos

Cement Silo Aeration Units

Cement Packhouse Airslide Mixer, Mixer Discharge Hopper 2 Vibrating Screens, Packer Hopper

Haver Packer North Scale Cement Loading System Airslide System to North Scale Loading Spout North Scale Loading Spout(Truck)

Center Sc ale Cement Loading System Airslide System to Center Scale Loading Spout Center Scale Loading Spout(Truck

- Rail) South Scale Cement Loading System Airslide System to South Scale Loading Spout South Scale Loading Spout(Truck

- Rail) Marl Silo No.3, Marl Fringe Bin Marl Silo No.12, Marl Silo No.4 Cement Loadout No.3, Bagged Cement Cleaning Station 10% Opacity

Each Method 9 40CFR63.1348 No 5.E.5(b)

TABLE 5.26 EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT ID 06 MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES/EQUIPMENT)

Equip

ID Pollutant or Stan dard Limit Reference

Method Regulation State Only Condition

Number

6175000 VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from Storage A Frame See

Condition Method 9 SC Standard 4,

Section IX and X No 5.E.6 (c)

N/A VISIBLE EMISSIONS

from Overburden Removal and Unloading 20% Opacity Method 9 SC Standard 4 Section IX(B) No 5.E.6(b)



### The maximum allowable emission limits contained in Tables 5.22 through 5.32 are derived from the various Federal and State regulations that govern the operation of this type of source. All applicable

facil ity wide emission limits and corresponding regulations are listed in Tables 5.22 through 5.32. Additional operating requirements which may be more stringent than those above are contained in Part 4.0, Part 6.0, and Part 7.0 of this permit.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 32 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### E. EMISS ION UNIT CONDITIONS

EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT ID 01 QUARRY/RAW MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT)

Condition

Number Condition

5.E.1(a) (40CFR60.11(c) and 40CFR60.672(b)) Visible emissions from each conveyor transfer point of the B2

Marl Conveyor, B5 Marl Conveyor and the B4 Mobile Belt Conveyor when conveying unsaturated materials shall not exhibit an opacity greater than 10% as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9 and the procedures of 40CFR60.675(c) and 40CFR60.11(b). No visible emissions are allowed from each conveyor transfer point when conveying saturated materials as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 22. These visible emission standards apply at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown

and malfunction.

5.E.1(b) (40CFR63. 6(h) and 40CFR63.1348) Visible emissions from the Clay Box Feeder System, Ash Box

Feeder System, Marl Box Feeder System and Iron Ore Feeder System shall each not exhibit an opacity greater than 10% as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. This visible emission standard applies at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction.

5.E.1(c) (40CFR60.11(c) and 40CFR60.672(c)) Fugitive emissions from the MMD Quarry Crusher shall not

exhibit an opacity greater than 15% as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9 and the procedures of 40CFR60.675(c) and 40CFR60.11(b). This visible emission standard applies at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction.

5.E.1(d) (SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 4 Section IX(B)) Visible emissions (including fugitive emissions) from

the Marl Ripping, Marl Transfer Loadout No.1, Marl Stockpile, Clay Stockpile, Iron Ore Stockpile, Ash Stockpile, Silica Stockpile, Calcium Stockpile and the Old Quarry Crusher shall each not exhibit an opacity of greater than 20%. For this emission limitation, EPA Method 9 shall be used to define and quantify opacity from this unit. Any changes to the implementation of the reference test method shall be made through the requirements of SC Regulation 6 1

- 62.1, Section IV (Source Tests) and SC Regulation

61

- 62.70.7 (Permit issuance, renewal, reopenings and revisions).

5.E.1(e) (SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 4 Section IX(A)) Visible emissions (including fugitive emissions) from

each conveyor transfer point of the Marl Conveyor/Radial Stacker shall not exhibit an opacity greater than 40%. For this emission limitation, EPA Method 9 shall be used to define and quantify opacity from this unit. Any changes to the implementation of the reference test method shall be made through the requirements of SC Regulation 61

- 62.1, Section IV (Source Tests) and SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7 (Permit issuance, renewal, reopenings and revisions).

5.E.1(f) (SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 4 Section IX(A)) Visible emissions (inc luding fugitive emissions) from

the Stamler Feeder shall not exhibit an opacity greater than 40%. For this emission limitation, EPA Method 9 shall be used to define and quantify opacity from this unit. Any changes to the implementation

of the reference t est method shall be made through the requirements of SC Regulation 61

- 62.1, Section IV (Source Tests) and SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7 (Permit issuance, renewal, reopenings and revisions).

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 33 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT ID 01 QUARRY/RAW MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT)

Condition

Number Condition

5.E.1(g) In accordance with SC Regulation 61

- 62.5, Standard No. 4

- E missions from Process Industries, Section

VIII

- Other Manufacturing, particulate matter emissions shall be limited to the rate specified by use of the following equations: for process weight rates less than or equal to 30 tons per hour (E = 4.10P 0.67 ) and for process weight rates greater than 30 tons per hour (E = 55.0P 0.11

- 40) where E = the allowable emission rate in pounds per hour and P = process weight rate in tons per hour. As such, each process’s allowable particulate matter emission limit is limi ted to the amount shown in the table below at its nominal production rating:

Process Emission Limit (lbs/hr) Process Weight Rate

(tons/hr)
Line 1 Raw Material Processing (Raw mill feed, kiln feed, and coal mill systems) 71.54 619

EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT ID 02 KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMEN T)

Condition

Number Condition

5.E.2(a) (40CFR 63.6(h) and 40CFR63.1348) Visible emissions from each transfer point of the Raw Mill Feed

Belt Conveyor and Kiln Feed Elevator shall not exhibit an opacity that excee ds 10% as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. This visible emission standard applies at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction.

5.E.2(b) (SC Regulation 62.5 Standard 4 Section IV) Particulate matter emissions (E(lb/hr )) from the Main Kiln

Stack shall not exceed the allowable particulate matter emission limit as specified in paragraph (b)(1) of

this condition.

(b)(1) E(lb/hr) = ((3.269E

- 05)(P 3 ))

- ((0.01049)(P 2 )) + ((1.164)(P)) + 2.823 (P in tph)

5.E.2(c) (40CFR63.6( h) and 40CFR63.1348) Visible emissions from the Vertical Raw Mill Feed Bin shall not

exhibit an opacity greater than 10% as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. This visible emission standard applies at all times except during periods of startup, shu tdown and malfunction.

5.E.2(d) (40CFR60.11(c) and 40CFR60.252(c)) Visible emissions from the Coal Crusher Tower, Coal Grizzley,

Coal Reclaim Hoppers, South Coal Day Tank, Pre

- Cal Coal Day Tank, Coal Cyclone, Dust Collector, 672 Kiln Coal Mill, Precalci ner Coal Mill, Precalciner Coal Bin, Rail Road Coal Unloading Hopper and the 925’ Coal Inclined Conveyor Belt shall each not exhibit an opacity greater than 20% as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. This visible emission standard applies at all tim es except during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction.

5.E.2(e) (40CFR60.11(c) and 40CFR60.252(c)) Visible emissions from each conveyor transfer point of the

Radial Stacker Belt, Reclaim Conveyor Belt to Coal Day Tank, Coal Day Tank Screw Conveyo r, Pre

Cal Coal Day Tank Belt Conveyor, 672 Kiln Coal Mill Feed Conveyor and Coal Transfer from C32 Belt shall not exhibit an opacity greater than 20%.as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. This visible emission standard applies at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown and

malfunction.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 34 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT ID 02 KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMEN T)

Condition

Number Condition

5.E.2(f) (40CFR63.6(h) and 40CFR63.1348) Visible emissions from the Pulverized Ash Silo, Marl Silo No.2,

Blend Silo, Raw Meal FK Pump, Pneumatic Transfer Piping to Blend Silo, Blend Silo Airslides, Ki ln Feed Silo, Raw Meal CP Transfer Pump, Pneumatic Transfer Piping to Kiln Feed Silo, Kiln Feed Silo Airslides and the Kiln Feed Bin shall each not exhibit an opacity greater than 10% as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9 This visible emission stand ard applies at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction.

5.E.2(g) (SC Regulation 62.5 Standard 4 Section IV, 40CFR60.6(h) and 40CFR63.1343(b)) Visible emissions

from the Main Kiln Stack shall not exhibit an opacity greater tha n 20% as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. This visible emission standard applies at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction.

EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT ID 02 KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMEN T)

Condition

Number Condit ion

5.E.2(h) (SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 3 Section III(A)) Nickel, Cadmium, Chromium, Arsenic, Lead, and

Hydrochloric Acid emissions from the Rotary Kiln shall not exceed the emission limitations listed in Table 5.27 when burning any wastes other than virgin fuels in the Rotary Kiln.

5.E.2(i) (SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 7 Avoidance) To remove the Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville

Plant) from SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 7 applicability, the maximum amount of the flue gas

volume at standar d conditions exiting the Precalciner Coal Mill shall not exceed the limits as stated in

Table 5.28.

5.E.2(j) (SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 7 Avoidance) To remove the owner/operator from SC Regulation 61

-

62.5 Standard 7 applicability, emissions of SO 2 , NO

x , and CO from the Rotary Kiln and Precalciner Coal

Mill shall not exceed the limits as stated in Table 5.29.

5.E.2(k) (40CFR63.6(f) and 40CFR63.1343(b)(3)) Dioxin/Furan emissions from the Rotary Kiln shall not exceed

0.20 ng TEQ/dscm corrected to 7% o xygen. Dioxin/furan emissions from the Rotary Kiln may exceed 0.20 ng TEQ/dscm but no more than 0.40 ng TEQ/dscm corrected to 7% oxygen provided that the combustion gas temperature at the inlet to the initial dry particulate matter control device is 400°F or lower based on the average of the test run average temperatures. This Dioxin/Furan emission standard applies at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction.

5.E.2 (l) (BACT limit for VOC) In accordance with SC Regulation 61

- 6 2.5, Standard 7, the BACT limits for

VOC emissions has been determined to be the following:

Process BACT limits for NM VOC

PH/PC Kiln #1 and

PCM 0.55 lb/ton of clinker; 3

- hour block averages; periodic

performance tests every 30 months

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 35 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 5.27

EM ISSION LIMITS WHEN B URNING ANY WASTES OT HER THAN VIRGIN FUEL S IN THE ROTARY KILN

Emission Constituent Emission Limitation (lb/10 6 Btu Input)

Nickel (Ni) 6.00E

- 03 Cadmium (Cd) 1.00E

- 04 Chromium (Cr) 7.40E

- 04 Arsenic (As) 1.70E

- 04 Lead (Pb) 5.00E

- 03

H ydrochloric Acid (HCl) 0.45

TABLE 5.28 MAXIMUM P ERCENT OF EXITING KI LN GAS VOLUME AT STA NDARD CONDITIONS

Source VSM On

- Mode Limit (%) VSM Off

- Mode Limit (%)

Rotary Kiln/PCM 95.0/5.0 95.0/5.0

TABLE 5.29

KILN STACK AND PRECA LCINER COAL MILL CRI TERIA P OLLUTANT EMISSION LI MITS

Source VSM On Mode Limit (lb/ton clinker) VSM Off Mode Limit (lb/ton clinker)

SO 2 NO

x CO Non

- Methane

VOC* SO 2 NO

x CO Non

- Methane

VOC* Rotary Kiln 1.71 4.56 8.835

-- 3.42 4.56 8.835

-- PCM 0.09 0.24 0.465

-- 0.18 0.24 0.465

-- Totals 1.80 4.80 9.30

-- 3.60 4.80 9.30

-- *Replaced with new BACT limit, as per Table 5.21.

EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT ID 03 CLINKER HANDLING EQU IPMENT)

Condition

Number Condition

5.E.3(a) (40CFR63.1345(a)(1)) Particulate matter emissions f rom the Clinker Cooler shall not contain particulate matter in excess of 0.050 kg/Mg (0.10 lb/ ton) of feed (dry basis) to the Rotary Kiln.

5.E.3(b) (40CFR63.6(h), 40CFR63.1345(a)(2) and 40CFR63.1348) Visible emissions from the Clinker Cooler,

Clinker S ilo No.1, Clinker Silo No.2, Clinker Silo No.21, Clinker Silo No.22, Clinker Silo No.31, Clinker Silo No.32, Reclaim Crusher and Fringe Clinker Silo shall each not exhibit an opacity greater than 10% as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. This visib le emission standard applies at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction.

5.E.3(c) (40CFR63.6(h) and 40CFR63.1348) Visible emissions from each transfer point of the Clinker Screw

Conveyors, Fredenhagen Clinker Conveyor, 3 Cli nker Elevators, Clinker Silo No.1 Belt Transfer Feed, Clinker Silo No.2 Belt Transfer Feed, Clinker Silo No.21 Belt Transfer Feed, Clinker Silo No.1 Belt Transfer Feed, Clinker Silo No.22 Belt Transfer Feed, Clinker Silo No.32 Belt Transfer Feed and Fringe Clinker Silo Belt Transfer Feed shall not exhibit an opacity greater than 10% as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. This visible emission standard applies at all times except during periods of startup,

shutdown and malfunction.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 36 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

EMISSION LIMIT S AND STANDARDS (UNIT 04 FINISH MILL SYSTEM E QUIPMENT)

Condition

Number Condition

5.E.4(a) (40CFR63.6(h), 40CFR63.1347 and 40CFR63.1348) Visible emissions from the 2 Gypsum Silos, Finish

Mill No.1, Finish Mill No.2, No.1 Mill Cement FK Pump, No.1 Mil l Separator, No.1 Mill Material Transfer, Finish Mill No.1 Bucket Elevator, No.2 Mill Cement FK Pump, No.2 Mill Cement After Cooler, Finish Mill No.2 Bucket Elevator, No.2 High Efficiency Separator, No.2 Material Transfer, Finish Mill No.3, No.3 Mill Cement FK Pump, No.3 Material Transfer, two( 2) Finish Mill No.3 Bucket Elevators, the No.3 High Efficiency Separator and Clinker Reclaim Hopper shall each not exhibit an opacity greater than 10% as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. This visible emission standard applies at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction.

EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT 04 FINISH MILL SYSTEM E QUIPMENT)

Condition

Number Condition

5.E.4(b) (40CFR63.6(h) and 40CFR63.1348) Visible emissio ns from each conveyor transfer point of the Gypsum

Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.1, Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.2 Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.3, Synthetic Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.1

, Synthetic Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.2, Syntheti c Gypsum Silo/Feed Belt Transfer No.3, Outside Clinker No.1/Belt Transfer and the Outside Clinker No.2/Belt Transfer shall not exhibit an opacity greater than 10% as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. This visible emission standard applies at all t imes except during periods of startup, shutdown and

malfunction.

5.E.4(c) In accordance with SC Regulation 61

- 62.5, Standard No. 4

- Emissions from Process Industries, Section VIII

- Other Manufacturing, particulate matter emissions shall be limited to t he rate specified by use of the following equations: for process weight rates less than or equal to 30 tons per hour (E = 4.10P 0.67 ) and for process weight rates greater than 30 tons per hour (E = 55.0P 0.11

- 40) where E = the allowable emission rate in po unds per hour and P = process weight rate in tons per hour. As such, each process’s allowable particulate matter emission limit is limited to the amount shown in the table below at its nominal production rating:

Process Emission Limit (lbs/hr) Process Wei ght Rate

(tons/hr)
Clinker conveying and storage (Line 1) 56.51 166

EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT 05 CEMENT LOADOUT EQUIP MENT)

Condition

Number Condition

5.E.5(a) (40CFR63.6(h) and 40CFR63.1348) Visible emissions from each transfer point of t he Packer Screw

Conveyor, Waste Screw Conveyor and Packer Elevator shall not exhibit an opacity greater than 10% as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. This visible emission standard applies at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown an d malfunction.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 37 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UNIT 05 CEMENT LOADOUT EQUIP MENT)

Condition

Number Condition

5.E.5(b) (40CFR63.6(h) and 40CFR63.1348) Visible emissions from Marl Silo No.3, Marl Fringe Bin, Marl Silo

No.12, Cement Silos Nos 1

- 11, Marl Silo No.4, Cement Silo No.13, Mixer, Packer Hopper, Haver Packer, Cement Loadout No.3, Pneumati c Transfer Piping to Cement Silos, Cement Silo Aeration Units, Cement Packhouse Airslide, Mixer Discharge Hopper, 2 Vibrating Screens, North Scale Cement Loading System, Airslide to North Scale Loading Spout, North Scale to Loading Spout (Truck), Center Scale Cement Loading System, Airslide to Center Scale Loading Spout, Center Scale to Loading Spout(Truck

- Rail), South Scale Cement Loading System, Airslide to South Scale Loading Spout, South Scale to Loading Spout (Truck

- Rail) and the Bagged Cement Cleani ng Station shall each not exhibit an opacity greater than 10% as determined by 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. This visible emission standard applies at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction.

EMISSION LIMITS AND STANDARDS (UN IT ID 06 MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES/EQUIPMENT)

Condition

Number Condition

5.E.6(b) (SC Regulation 62.5 Standard 4 Section IX(B)) Visible emissions (including fugitive emissions) from

Overburden Removal and Unloading shall not exhibit an opacity greater than 2 0% For this emission limitation, EPA Method 9 shall be used to define and quantify opacity from this unit. Any changes to the implementation of the reference test method shall be made through the requirements of SC Regulation 61

- 62.1, Section IV (Source Te sts) and SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7 (Permit issuance, renewal, reopenings and revisions).

5.E.6 (c) (Storage A

- frame) In accordance with SC Regulation 61

- 62.5, Standard No. 4

- Emissions from Process

Industries, Section IX

- Visible Emissions (Where Not Sp ecified Elsewhere), where construction or modification began on or before December 31, 1985, emissions (including fugitive emissions) shall not exhibit an opacity greater than 40%.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 38 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### PART 6.0 MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS [SC Regulation 61

- 62.1, Section II]; [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(3)(i)(B)]

A. MONITORING AND REPORTING

Tables 6.1 through 6.15 contain summaries of the monitoring and reporting required of this facility.

TABLE 6.1 MONITORING AND REPORTING (STARTUPS, SHUTDOWNS AND MALFUNCTION S)

Unit

ID Pollutant/Parameter Limit Required Monitoring Monitoring

Frequency Reporting

Frequency Condition

Number
01, 02 03, 04 05, 06 40CFR63 Subpart LLL

SSM Plan Requirements N/A Develop

SSM

Plan N/A N/A 6.B.1(a)

01, 02 03, 04 05, 06 Operation and Maintenance of Sources Subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL During

SSM N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.1(b)

01, 02 03, 04 05, 06 Records of Corrective Actions Taken During Periods of SSM When Such Actions

Are Consistent with the Procedures Specified in an Affect ed Source's SSM Plan N/A Recordkeeping See

Condition N/A 6.B.1(c)

01, 02 03, 04 05, 06 Records of Corrective Actions Taken During Periods of SSM when Such Actions

are Not Consistent with the Procedures Specified in an Affected Source's SSM Plan N/A Recor dkeeping See

Condition N/A 6.B.1(d)

01, 02 03, 04 05, 06 Records of the SSM Plan(s) N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.1(e)

01, 02 03, 04 05, 06 Immediate SSM Reports N/A Submit Report N/A See

Condition 6.B.1(f)

01, 02 03, 04 05, 06 Revisions to a SSM Plan N /A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.1(g)

01, 02 03, 04 05, 06 SSM Records for Process Equipment N/A Recordkeeping See

Condition N/A 6.B.1(h)

01, 02 03, 04 05, 06 Periodic SSM Reports N/A Submit Report N/A See

Condition 6.B.1(i)

TABLE 6.2 MONITORING AND REPORT ING ( CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Unit ID Pollutant/Parameter Limit Required Monitoring Monitoring

Frequency Reporting

Frequency Condition

Number
02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) CMS Requirements for the Combining

of Effluents N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B. 2(a)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Reporting Requirements for Multiple

CMS N/A Submit Report N/A See

Condition 6.B.2(b)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) CMS Operation and Maintenance N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.2(c)

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 39 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 6.3 MONITORING AND REPORTING ( CONTIN UOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Unit ID Pollutant/Parameter Limit Required Monitoring Monitoring

Frequency Reporting

Frequency Condition

Number
02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) CMS Installation N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.2(d)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Minimum Pr ocedures for COMS N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.2(e)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Records of CMS Zero (Low

- Level) and

High

- Level Calibration Drifts for CMS except CPMS N/A Monitor

and

Record Drifts Daily N/A 6.B.2(f)

02 (6105000) CPMS System Response Chec ks N/A Check System Response Daily N/A 6.B.2(g)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Records of All CMS Calibration

Checks N/A Recordkeeping N/A N/A 6.B.2(h)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Records of All Adjustments and

Maintenance Performed on CMS N/A Recordkeeping N/A N/A 6.B.2(i)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) CMS Quality Control Program N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.2(j)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Out of Control CMS N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.2(k)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Records of CMS Malfunction or

Inoperat ive Periods N/A Recordkeeping N/A N/A 6.B.2(l)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Records of All Required CMS

Measurements N/A Recordkeeping N/A N/A 6.B.2(m)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Records of Date and Time that Identify

Inoperative CMS Periods N/A Recordkeep ing N/A N/A 6.B.2(n)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Records of Date and Time that Identify

Out of Control CMS Periods N/A Recordkeeping N/A N/A 6.B.2(o)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Records of Total Process Operating

Time During the Reporting Period N/A Record keeping N/A N/A 6.B.2(p)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Records of the Specific Identification of

Each Period of Excess Emissions and Parameter Monitoring Exceedances N/A Recordkeeping N/A N/A 6.B.2(q)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Records of CMS Malfunctions,

Corrective Actions and Repairs N/A Recordkeeping N/A N/A 6.B.2(r)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Records of All CMS Measurements

Needed to Demonstrate Compliance

With A Relevant Standard N/A Recordkeeping N/A N/A 6.B.2(s)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Reduction of COMS and CEMS Data N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.2(t)

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 40 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 6.4 MONITORING AND REPORTING ( CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Unit ID Pollutant/Parameter Limit Required Monitoring Monitoring

Frequency Reporting

Frequency Condition

Number
02, 03 (610500 0) (6115000) Emission Data Units of Measurement N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.2(u)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Use of Monitoring Data Recorded During

Periods of Unavoidable CMS Breakdowns,

Out

- Of

- Control Periods, Repairs, Maintenance Periods, Calibration Checks and Zero (Low

- Level) and High

- Level Adjustments N/A Recordkeeping N/A N/A 6.B.2(v)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Request to Reduce the Frequency of

Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Reports N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.2(w)

02, 03 (6105000) (61 15000) Recording of CMS Data N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.2(x)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Content and Submittal Dates for Excess

Emissions and CMS Performance Reports N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.2(y)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Records of Procedures th at are Part of a

CMS Quality Control Program N/A Recordkeeping N/A N/A 6.B.2(z)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Summary Report Content Requirements N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.2(aa)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Submission of Only the Summary Report N/A See Co ndition N/A See

Condition 6.B.2(bb)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Reduction in the Frequency of Submitting

Excess Emissions and CMS Performance and/or Summary Reports N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.2(cc)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Submission of Both the Summ ary Report

and the Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Report N/A See Condition N/A See

Condition 6.B.2(dd)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Excess Emissions and CMS Performance

Reports and/or Summary Reports N/A See Condition N/A See

Condition 6.B.2(ee)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Resumption of the Normal Frequency of

Submitting Excess Emissions and CMS Performance and/or Summary Reports N/A See Condition N/A See

Condition 6.B.2(ff)

TABLE 6.5 MONITORING AND REPORTING (AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT )

Unit

I D Pollutant/Parameter Limit Required Monitoring Monitoring

Frequency Reporting

Frequency Condition

Number
01, 02 03, 04 05, 06 Air Pollution Control and Monitoring Equipment Maintenance Records N/A Recordkeeping N/A N/A 6.B.3(a)

01, 02 03, 04 05, 06 Oper ation and Maintenance of

Air Pollution Control Equipment N/A See Condition See

Condition N/A 6.B.3(b)

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 41 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

01, 02 03, 04 05, 06 Records of the Occurrence and Duration of Air Pollution Control and Monitoring Equipment N/A Recordkeeping N/A N/A 6.B.3(c)

TABLE 6.6 MONITORING AND REPORTING ( REGULATION APPLICABILITY DETERMINATIONS)

Unit

ID Pollutant/Parameter Limit Required Monitoring Monitoring

Frequency Reporting

Frequency Condition

Number
01, 02 03, 04 05, 06 Recordkeeping Requirement

for Regulation Applicabi lity Determinations N/A Recordkeeping N/A N/A 6.B.4(a)

TABLE 6.7 MONITORING AND REPORTING ( CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS)

Equip ID Pollutant/Parameter Limit Required Monitoring Monitoring

Frequency Reporting

Frequency Condition

Number
02, 03 (6105000) (6 115000) CMS Performance Evaluations N/A Conduct

Performance

Evaluations N/A N/A 6.B.5(a)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Notification of CMS Performance

Evaluations N/A Submit

Notification N/A See

Condition 6.B.5(b)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Content of

CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan N/A Develop

Evaluation

Plan N/A N/A 6.B.5(c)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Submission of

CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan N/A Submit

Evaluation

Plan N/A See

Condition 6.B.5(d)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Department Appro val

of

CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.5(e)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Department Failure to

Approve or Disapprove a CMS

Performance Evaluation Plan N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.5(f)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Conduc t of

CMS Performance Evaluations and

CMS Performance Evaluation Dates N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.5(g)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Reporting of

CMS Performance Evaluation Results N/A Submit Report N/A See

Condition 6.B.5(h)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) A lternative to

CEMS Relative Accuracy Test N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.5(i)

TABLE 6.8 MONITORING AND REPORTING ( CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS)

Equip ID Pollutant/Parameter Limit Required Monitoring Monitoring

Frequency Reporting

Frequency Condition

Numb er 02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Department Rescission of

Approval to use the Alternative to the CEMS Relative Accuracy Test N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.5(j)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Content of Petition to use the Alternative

to the CEMS Relative Accura cy Test N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.5(k)

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 42 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

02 (6105000) PM CEMS Correlation Tests N/A See

Condition See

Condition N/A 6.B.5(l)

02 (6105000) Content and Submission of

PM CEMS Correlation Test Plan N/A Develop

and

Submit

Plan N/A See

Condition 6.B.5(m)

0 2 (6105000) Stack Sampling Team and

PM CEMS Correlation Tests N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.5(n)

02 (6105000) Department Approval or Disapproval

of PM CEMS Test Plan N/A See

Condition N/A See

Condition 6.B.5(o)

TABLE 6.9 MONITORING AND REPORTING (POLL UTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Unit ID Pollutant/Parameter Limit Required Monitoring Monitoring

Frequency Reporting

Frequency Condition

Number
02, 03 04 05, 06 Notification of PPT N/A Submit

Notification N/A See

Condition 6.B.6(a)

02, 03 04 05, 06 Submissio n of PPT Plan N/A Submit

Test Plan N/A See

Condition 6.B.6(b)

02, 03 04 05, 06 Content of PPT Plan N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.B.6(c)

02, 03 04 05, 06 PPT Method Audit Program N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.6(d)

02, 03 04 05, 06 Department Approval of PPT Plan N/A See

Condition N/A See

Condition 6.B.6(e)

02, 03 04 05, 06 Department Failure to Approve or

Disapprove a PPT Plan N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.6(f)

02, 03 04 05, 06 PPT Facilities N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.6(g)

02, 03 04 05, 06 Conduct of PPT N/A S ee Condition N/A N/A 6.B.6(h)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Required Number of PPT Runs N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.6(i)

02, 03 04 05, 06 Written Request to

Use an Alternative PPT Method N/A See

Condition N/A See

Condition 6.B.6(j)

02, 03 04 05, 06 Depa rtment Approval of

Alternative PPT Methods N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.6(k)

02, 03 04 05, 06 Department Dispute of the Results

Obtained by the Use of an Alternative

PPT N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.B.6(l)

TABLE 6.10 MONITORING AND REPORTING (POLLUTANT PERFORMAN CE TESTING)

Unit ID Pollutant/Parameter Limit Required Monitoring Monitoring

Frequency Reporting

Frequency Condition

Number
02, 03 04 05, 06 Final Written Reporting of

PPT Results N/A Submit Report N/A See

Condition 6.B.6(m)

02, 03 04 05, 06 Failure of PPT N/A See

Condition N/A See

Condition 6.B.6(n)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Conduct of

PPT and Reduction of Data N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.6(o)

02, 03 04 05, 06 Waiver of PPT N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.B.6(p)

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 43 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

02, 03 04 05, 06 Request to Waive a PPT N/A See

Condition N/A See

Condition 6.B.6(q)

02, 03 04 05, 06 Department Approval of Request to

Waive a PPT N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.B.6(r)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Use of COMS During PPT N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.6(s)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Reduction of CO MS Data During a

PPT N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.6(t)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Proper Operation of a COMS During

a PPT N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.6(u)

02, 03 (6105000) (6115000) Use of COMS Data In Lieu of

40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9

Observations During a PPT N/A See

Condition N/A N/A 6.B.6(v)

02 (6105000) PPT for

Rotary Kiln Dioxin/Furan Emissions See

Condition 5.E.2(k) Conduct

Performance

Test See

Condition See

Condition 6.B.6(m) 6.B.6(w)

02 (6105000) PPT for Changes in Operations that

may Af fect Compliance with the Rotary Kiln Dioxin/Furan Emission

Limit N/A See

Condition See

Condition See

Condition 6.B.6(m) 6.B.6(x)

03 (6115000) PPT for

Clinker Cooler PM Emissions See

Condition 5.E.3(a) Conduct

Performance

Test See

Condition N/A 6.B.6(y)

03 (6105000) PPT for Rotary Kiln PM Emissions See

Condition 5.E.2(b) Conduct

Performance

Test See

Condition See

Condition 6.B.6(m) 6.B.6(z)

02, 03 04 05, 06 Additional Performance Testing N/A See

Condition See

Condition N/A 6.B.6(aa)

02, 03 (6105000) ( 6200000) PPT for Rotary Kiln and Precalciner

Coal Mill SO 2 , NO

x , CO, HCl, Ni, Cd, Cr, As and Pb Emissions See

Conditions 5.E.2(h) 5.E.2(j) Conduct

Performance

Test See

Condition See

Condition 6.B.8(m) 6.B.6(bb)

See

Condition Initial PPT for Visible Emiss ions from

Sources Subject to 40CFR63.1348 See

Table 5.19 through

Table 5.26 Conduct

Performance

Test See

Condition See

Condition 6.B.6(m) 6.B.6(cc)

02 (6105000) (6200000) Pollutant Performance Test for

Rotary Kiln and Precalciner Coal

Mill NO

x Emissions See

Condition 5.E.2(j) Conduct

Performance

Test See

Condition See

Condition 6.B.6(m) 6.B.6(dd)

02, 03 (6105000) (6200000) PPT for Rotary Kiln and Precalciner

Coal Mill for NMVOC See

Conditions 5.E.2(l) Conduct

Performance

Test Initially,

every 30

months S ee

Condition 6.B.6(ee)

TABLE 6.11 MONITORING AND REPORTING (PERIODIC VISIBLE EMISSIONS MONITORING OF SOURCES SUBJECT TO 40CFR63.1348 )

Unit

ID Pollutant/Parameter Limit Required Monitoring Monitoring

Frequency Reporting

Frequency Condition

Number

02, 0 3 04 05, 06 Visible Emissions Monitoring of

Sources Subject to 40CFR63.1348

After Initial Visible Emissions Test has been Completed See

Table 5.19 through

Table 5.26 See

Condition See

Condition N/A 6.B.7(a)

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 44 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

02, 03 04 05, 06 Visible Emissions Monitoring of a

Finish Mill’s Sweep and Air Separator

PMCD After the Initial Visible Emissions Test has been Completed See

Table 5.23 See

Condition See

Condition N/A 6.B.7(b)

TABLE 6.12 MONITORING AND REPORTING (WRITTEN OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN )

Unit

ID Poll utant/Parameter Limit Required Monitoring Monitoring

Frequency Reporting

Frequency Condition

Number
02, 03 04 05, 06 40CFR63 Subpart LLL Written

Operations and Maintenance Plan N/A See Condition N/A N/A 6.B.8(a)

TABLE 6.13 MONITORING AND REPORTING (UN IT ID 01 QUARRY/RAW MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT)

Unit

ID Pollutant/Parameter Limit Required Monitoring Monitoring

Frequency Reporting

Frequency Condition

Number

01 (1002000) Conveying Saturated and Unsaturated

Materials Using the 2 Mobile Marl

Conveyors See

Condition 5.E.1(a) See Condition N/A See

Condition 6.B.9(a)

01 Quarry Equipment Inspections of

Quarry Equipment Processing

Unsaturated Materials N/A Conduct Inspections

and

Maintenance Weekly N/A 6.B.9(b)

01 Quarry Equipment

Like for Like Replacemen ts N/A See Condition N/A See

Condition 6.B.9(c)

01 Visible Emission Monitoring of

Quarry Equipment Processing

Unsaturated Materials N/A Conduct

Visual

Observations Weekly N/A 6.B.9(d)

01 Physical or Operational Change in

Quarry Operations N/A Submit

No tification N/A See

Condition 6.B.9(e)

TABLE 6.14 MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 02 ROTARY KILN)

Unit

ID Pollutant/Parameter Limit Required Monitoring Monitoring

Frequency Reporting

Frequency Condition

Number

02 (6105000) Continuous Monitoring of

Ro tary Kiln Dioxin/Furan Emissions See

Condition 5.E.2(k) See

Condition Continuous N/A 6.B.10(a)

02 (6105000) Continuous Monitoring of

Rotary Kiln Visible Emissions 20% Opacity COMS Continuous N/A 6.B.10(b)

02 (6105000) Continuous Monitoring of

Rotary Ki ln PM Emissions See

Condition 5.E.2(b) CPMS Continuous N/A 6.B.10(c)

02 (6105000) Records of

Rotary Kiln Clinker Production and

Feed Rates See

Condition Recordkeeping N/A N/A 6.B.10(d)

02 (6105000) Rotary Kiln Permitted Fuels See

Condition See

Condition See

Condition N/A 6.B.10(e)

02 (6105000) Sulfur Content of Rotary Kiln Fuels See

Condition See

Condition See

Condition N/A 6.B.10(f)

02 (6105000) Maximum Percent Kiln Gas Volume

for Vertical Spindle Mill Modes See

Condition See

Condition See

Condition N/A 6.B.10(g)

02 (6105000) Rotary Kiln

Combustion System Inspections N/A Conduct Inspections See

Condition N/A 6.B.10(h)

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 45 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

02 (6105000) Visible Emission Monitoring of

Uncontrolled Coal Processing Equipment See

Conditions 5.E.2(d) 5.E.2(e) Conduct

Visual

Observations Weekly N/A 6.B.10(i)

02 (6105000) Maximum Rotary Kiln

PMCD Inlet Gas Temperature Limit See

Condition 5.E.2(k) See

Condition See

Condition N/A 6.B.10(j)

02 (6105000) Total NO

x Emissions

Recordkeeping and Reporting See

Condition 5.E.2(n) Su bmit

Report N/A See

Condition 6.B.10(k)

TABLE 6.15 MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 03 CLINKER COOLER)

Unit

ID Pollutant/Parameter Limit Required Monitoring Monitoring

Frequency Reporting

Frequency Condition

Number

03 (6115000) Continuous Monitoring of

Clinker Cooler Visible Emissions 10% Opacity COMS Continuous N/A 6.B.11(a)



### B. MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (STARTUPS, SHUTDOWNS AND MALFUNCTIONS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.1(a) 40CFR63 Subpart LLL S SM Plan Requirements

(40CFR63.6(e)(3)(i) and 40CFR63.6(e)(3)(vi)) When a source becomes subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL, the owner/operator shall develop and implement a written Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan for operating and maintaining the sour ce subject to that subpart during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction. The plan shall describe in detail, procedures for operating and maintaining the source during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction and also include a program of corre ctive action for malfunctioning process, air pollution control and air pollution monitoring equipment used to comply with a relevant standard. The owner/operator may choose to maintain a separate Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan for each source subj ect to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL or choose to maintain one plan for all sources subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. If the owner/operator chooses to maintain one plan, when new sources subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL are added, it shall revise the plan to include the required information for that source no later than 180 calendar days after placing it in operation. To satisfy the requirements to develop a startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, the owner/operator may use the affected source's SOP manual, OSHA or othe r plan, provided the alternative plans meet all the requirements of this condition and are made available for inspection by Department personnel.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (STARTUPS, SHUTDOWNS AND MALFUNCTIONS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B .1(b) Operation and Maintenance of Sources Subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL During SSM

(40CFR63.6(e)(3)(ii)) During periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, the owner/operator shall for a source subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL, operate and maintain it (including associated air pollution control and monitoring equipment) in accordance with the procedures specified in its Startup, Shutdown and

Malfunction Plan.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 46 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (STARTUPS, SHUTDOWNS AND MALFUNCTIONS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.1(c) Records of Corrective Actions Taken During Periods of SSM When Such Actions Are Cons istent with the

Procedures Specified in an Affected Source's SSM Plan (40CFR63.6(e)(3)(iii), 40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(b)(2)(v))) For process and air pollution control equipment subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL,

the owner/operator shall record all inf ormation necessary to demonstrate conformance with an affected source's Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan when all actions taken during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction (including corrective actions to restore malfunctioning process and ai r pollution control and monitoring equipment to its normal or usual manner of operation) are consistent with the procedures specified in the plan. The information needed to demonstrate conformance with the Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan may be reco rded using a "checklist," or some other effective form of recordkeeping, in order to minimize the recordkeeping burden for conforming events. These records shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years following the date of each occurrence. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic ta pe disks, or on microfiche.

6.B.1(d) Records of Corrective Actions Taken During Periods of SSM when Such Actions are Not Consistent with

the Procedures Specified in an Affected Source's SSM Plan (40CFR63.6(e)(3)(iv), 40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(b)(2) (iv)) For process and air pollution control equipment subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL,

the owner/operator shall record the actions taken during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction (including corrective actions to restore malfunctioning process and air pollution control and monitoring equipment to its normal or usual manner of operation) when such actions are not consistent with the procedures specified in an affected source's Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan. These records shall

be retained f

or a calendar period of five(5) years following the date of each occurrence. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

6.B.1(e) Records of the SSM Plan(s)

(40CFR63.6(e)(3)(v)) The owner/operator shall maintain the current written Startup, Shutdown and

Malfunction Plan(s) on

- site and on

- file that it developed for sources subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL and make it (them) available for inspection by Department personnel. In addition, if a Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Plan is subsequently revised as provided in c ondition 6.B.1(g), the owner/operator shall

maintain on

- site and on

- file each previous (i.e., superseded) version of that Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan and make each previous version available for inspection by Department personnel for a period of five(5) calendar years after revision of a plan. If at any time after adoption of a Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan an affected source ceases operation or is otherwise no longer subject to the provisions of 40CFR63 Subpart LLL, the owner/operator shall retain a copy of the most recent plan on

- site and on

- file for a period of five(5) calendar years from the date the source ceases operation or is no longer subject to that subpart and make the plan available to Department personnel upon request.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 47 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (STARTUPS, SHUTDOWNS AND MALFUNCTIONS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.1(f) Immediate Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Reports

(40CFR63.6(e)(3)(iv), 40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(d)(5)(ii)) Notwithstanding the allowance to reduce the frequency of reporting for Periodic Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction reports specified by condition 6.B.1(i), any time an action taken by the owner/operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction (including actions taken to correct a malfunction) is not consistent with the procedures specified in an affected source's Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan, it shall report the actions taken for that event within two(2) working days to the Regional EQC Office after commenci ng actions inconsistent with the plan followed by a written letter within seven(7) working days after the end of the event. The immediate report required under this paragraph shall consist of a telephone call (or facsimile (FAX) transmission) to the Regio nal EQC Office within two(2) working days after commencing actions inconsistent with the plan. It shall be followed by a written letter addressed to the Regional EQC Office, delivered or postmarked within seven(7) working days after the end of the event, t hat contains the name, title and signature of the responsible official who is certifying its accuracy, explaining the circumstances of the event, the reasons for not following the Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan and whether any excess emissions and /or parameter monitoring exceedances are believed to have occurred. Notwithstanding the requirements of the previous sentence, the owner/operator may make alternative reporting arrangements, in advance, with the Department. These reports shall also be ret ained for a calendar period of five(5) years following the date of each occurrence. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of reports shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years of reports may be retained off

- site. Such records of reports may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on

microfiche.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 48 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (STARTUPS, SHUTDOWNS AND MALFUNCTIONS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.1(g) Revisions to a SSM Plan

(40CFR63.6(e)(3)(vii) and 40CFR63.6(e)(3)(viii)) The Department may require the owner/operator to make changes to an affected source’s Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan. The Department may require

re asonable revisions to a Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan for any of the reasons specified by paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(4) of this condition. The owner/operator may periodically revise a Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Plan for an affected sour ce as necessary to satisfy the requirements of 40CFR63 Subpart LLL or to reflect changes in equipment or procedures at the affected source. Unless the Department specifies otherwise, the owner/operator may make such revisions to a Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan without prior approval by the Department. However, each such revision to a Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan shall be reported in the semiannual report required by condition 6.B.1(i). If a Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan fails to address or inadequately addresses an event that meets the characteristics of a malfunction (as defined in condition 6.B.1(h)) but was not included in the plan at the

time that the owner/operator developed the plan, then it shall revise the plan wi thin 45 calendar days after the event to include detailed procedures for operating and maintaining the source during similar malfunction events and a program of corrective action for similar malfunctions of process or air pollution control and monitoring e quipment. In the event that the owner/operator makes any revision to a Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan which alters the scope of the activities at a source which are deemed to be a startup, shutdown, malfunction, or otherwise modifies the applicabil ity of any emission limit, work practice requirement, or other requirement in an applicable standard, the revised plan shall not take effect until after

the owner/operator has provided a written notice describing the revision to the Department.

(g)(1) A p lan does not address a startup, shutdown, or malfunction event that has occurred.

(g)(2) A plan fails to provide for the operation of the source (including associated air pollution control and monitoring equipment) during a startup, shutdown, or malfunct ion event in a manner consistent with safety and good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions to the levels required by the

relevant standards.

(g)(3) A plan does not provide adequate procedures for correcting malfunctioning process an d/or air pollution control and monitoring equipment as quickly as practicable.

(g)(4) A plan includes an event that does not meet the definition of a startup, shutdown or malfunction as defined in condition 6.B.1(h).

6.B.1(h) SSM Records for Process Equ ipment

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.99 Subpart B Section 99.44(c)(2)), 40CFR60.7(b), 40CFR63.2, 40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(b)(2)(i)) A startup is defined as the setting in operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose and a shutdown is defined as the cessation of operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose. A malfunction is defined as any sudden, infrequent and not reasonably preventable failure of air pollution control and monitoring equi pment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner. Failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctions. The owner/operator shall record the occurrence and duration of each startup, s hutdown or malfunction of operation of process equipment subject to 40CFR60 Subpart Y, 40CFR60 Subpart OOO and 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. These records shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years following the date of each startup, shutdown or malf unction. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, o n magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 49 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (STARTUPS, SHUTDOWNS AND MALFUNCTIONS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.1(i) Periodic Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Reports

(40CFR63.6(e)(3)(iii), 40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40 CFR63.10(d)(5)(i)) For all sources subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL, if actions taken by the owner/operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction of an affected source (including actions taken to correct a malfunction) are consistent with the procedures specified in a source's Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan, then the owner/operator shall state such information in a Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Report. Reports shall only be required if a startup, shutdown, or malfunction occurred during the r eporting period and they shall include the number, duration and a brief description of each startup, shutdown, or malfunction. The Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Report shall consist of a letter, containing the name, title and signature of the responsib le official who is certifying its accuracy and be submitted to the Department semiannually (or on a more frequent basis if specified otherwise in a relevant standard or as established otherwise). The Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Report shall be addres sed to the Manager of the Technical Management Section, Bureau of Air Quality and delivered or postmarked by the 30th calendar day following the end of each calendar half (or other calendar reporting period, as appropriate). If the owner/operator is requi red to submit Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Reports (or other periodic reports), the Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Reports may be submitted simultaneously with the Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Reports (or other reports). If Startup, Shut down and Malfunction Reports are submitted with Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Reports (or other periodic reports) and the Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) receives approval to reduce the frequency of reporting for the latter, the frequ ency of reporting for the Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Reports also may be reduced if the Department does not object to the intended change. The procedures to implement the allowance in the preceding sentence shall be the same as the procedures specif ied for Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Reports (see conditions 6.B.2(w), 6.B.2(cc), 6.B.2(dd) and 6.2.B(ee)). These reports shall also be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years following the date of each occurrence. At a minimum, the most r ecent two(2) years of reports shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years of reports may be

retained off

- site. Such records of reports may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.2(a) CMS Requirements for the Combining of Effluents

(40CFR63.8(b)(2)(i) and 40CFR63.8(b)(2)(ii)) When the emissions from two(2) or more affected sources are combined before being released to the atmosphere, the owner/operator may install an applicable CMS for each emission stream or for the combined emissions streams, provided the monitoring is sufficient to demonstrate comp liance with a relevant standard. If a relevant standard is a mass emission standard and the emissions from one affected source are released to the atmosphere through more than one emission point,

then the owner/operator shall install an applicable CMS at e ach emission point unless the installation of fewer systems is approved by the Department or provided for in a relevant standard (e.g., instead of requiring that a CMS be installed at each emission point before the effluents from those points are

channeled to a common control device, the standard specifies that only one CMS is required to be installed at the vent of the control device).

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 50 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.2(b) Reportin g Requirements for Multiple CMS

(40CFR63.8(b)(3)) When more than one CMS is used to measure the emissions from one affected source (e.g., multiple breechings, multiple outlets), the owner/operator shall report the results as required for each CMS. However, when one CMS is used as a backup to another CMS, it shall report the results from the CMS used to meet the monitoring requirements of 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. If both such CMS are used during a particular reporting period to meet the monitoring requirements o f 40CFR63 Subpart LLL, then the owner/operator shall report the results from each CMS for the relevant compliance period.

6.B.2(c) CMS Operation and Maintenance

(40CFR63.8(c)(1) and 40CFR63.8(c)(4)) For an affected source required by 40CFR63 Subpart LLL to be monitored using a CMS, the owner/operator shall maintain and operate each CMS in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices. For all CMS, the owner/operator hall keep the necessary parts for routine repairs of the affected CMS equ ipment readily available and comply with the written Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan that it implemented as specified in condition 6.B.1(a). Except for system breakdowns, out

- of

- control periods, repairs, maintenance periods, calibration checks and z ero (low

- level) and high

- level calibration drift adjustments, all CMS, including COMS and CEMS, shall be in continuous operation.

6.B.2(d) CMS Installation

(40CFR63.8(c)(2) and 40CFR63.8(c)(3)) All CMS shall be installed such that representative measure s of emissions or process parameters from an affected source are obtained. In addition, CEMS shall be located according to procedures contained in the applicable performance specification(s). Unless stated otherwise,

the owner/operator shall ensure that th e read out (the portion of the CMS that provides a visual display or record), or other indication of operation, from any CMS required for compliance with an emission standard is readily accessible on

- site for operational control or inspection by the operat or of the equipment. All CMS shall be installed, operational and the data verified as specified in a relevant standard either prior to or in conjunction with conducting performance tests. Verification of operational status shall, at a minimum, include comp letion of the manufacturer's written specifications or recommendations for installation, operation, and calibration of the system.

6.B.2(e) Minimum Procedures for COMS

(40CFR63.8(c)(5)) Unless otherwise approved by the Department, the minimum procedures for COMS shall include a method for producing a simulated zero opacity condition and an upscale (high

- level) opacity condition using a certified neutral density filter or other related technique to produce a known obscuration of the light beam. Such proce dures shall provide a system check of all the analyzer's internal optical surfaces and all electronic circuitry, including the lamp and photodetector assembly normally used in the measurement of opacity.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 51 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.2(f) Records of CMS Zero (Low

- Level) and High

- Level Calibration Drifts for CMS except CPMS

(40CFR63.8(c)(6) and 40CFR63.10(b)(1)) The owner/operator for a CMS that s not a CPMS, which is

inst alled in accordance with the provisions of 40CFR63 Subpart LLL and the applicable CMS performance specification(s), shall monitor and record the zero (low

- level) and high

- level calibration drifts at least once daily in accordance with the written procedu re specified in the CMS Performance Evaluation Plan as specified by condition 6.B.7(c). The zero (low

- level) and high

- level calibration drifts shall be adjusted, at a minimum, whenever the 24

- hour zero (low

- level) drift exceeds two times the limits of th e applicable performance specification(s) specified in the relevant standard. The system shall allow the amount of excess zero (low

- level) and high

- level drift measured at the 24

- hour interval checks to be recorded and quantified whenever specified. For CO MS, all optical and instrumental surfaces exposed to the effluent gases shall be cleaned prior to performing the zero (low

- level) and high

- level drift adjustments; the optical surfaces and

instrumental surfaces shall be cleaned when the cumulative automati c zero compensation, if applicable, exceeds 4% opacity. These records shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years following the date of each calibration check. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on

- site

and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on

microfiche.

6.B.2(g) CPMS System Response Checks

(40CFR63.8(c )(6) and 40CFR63.10(b)(1)) Once a CPMS is required to be installed and operating, the CPMS shall be calibrated prior to use for the purposes of complying with this condition. The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) shall check the CPMS daily for indication that the system is responding. If the CPMS system includes an internal system check, results shall be recorded and checked daily for proper operation. These records shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years following

the date of each system response check. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records shall be

retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on comp uter floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on

microfiche.

6.B.2(h) Records of All CMS Calibration Checks

(40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(b)(2)(x)) The owner/operator shall record all calibration checks of CMS subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. These rec ords shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years following the date of each calibration check. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records

shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retaine d off

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks,

or on microfiche.

6.B.2(i) Records of All Adjustments and Maintenance Performed on CMS

(40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(b)(2)(xi)) T he owner/operator shall record all adjustments and maintenance performed on CMS required by 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. These records shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years following the date of each adjustment or maintenance action. At a

minimu m, the most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape dis ks, or on microfiche.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 52 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.2(j) CMS Quality Control Program

(40CFR63.8(d)) The owner/operator shall follow the CMS Quality Control Program(s) that it de veloped and implemented for the CMS required by 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. As part of the CMS Quality Control Program, it shall develop and submit to the Department for approval a site

- specific CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan for the required CMS performanc e evaluation. In addition, the CMS Quality Control Program shall include, at a minimum, a written protocol that describes procedures for each of the operations listed in paragraphs (j)(1) through (j)(6) of this condition. The results of this CMS Quality Co ntrol Program will be considered by the Department when it determines the validity of monitoring data. The owner/operator shall keep these written procedures on

- site and on

- file for the life of an affected source or until the affected source is no longer s ubject to the provisions of 40CFR63 Subpart LLL and make then available to Department personnel upon request. If a CMS Quality Control Plan is revised, then owner/operator shall keep previous (i.e., superseded) versions of the plan on

- site and on

- file for a calendar period of five(5) years after the date of each revision to the plan and made available to Department personnel upon request. Revisions to a plan do not require a formal operating permit modification. Where relevant (e.g., program of corrective a ction for a malfunctioning continuous monitoring system) these written procedures may be incorporated as part of an affected source's Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan to avoid duplication of planning and recordkeeping efforts.

(j)(1) Initial and any subsequent calibration of the CMS.

(j)(2) Determination and adjustment of the calibration drift of the continuous monitoring system.

(j)(3) Preventive maintenance of the continuous monitoring system, including spare parts inventory.

(j)(4) Data recordi ng, calculations, and reporting.

(j)(5) Accuracy audit procedures, including sampling and analysis methods.

(j)(6) Program of corrective action for a malfunctioning CMS.

6.B.2(k) Out of Control CMS

(40CFR63.8(c)(7) ) A CMS is out of control if

- the zero (low

- level), mid

- level (if applicable), or high

- level calibration drift exceeds two times the applicable calibration drift specification in the applicable performance specification or in the relevant standard, the CMS fails a performance test audit (e.g., cylinder gas audit), relative accuracy audit, relative accuracy test audit, linearity test audit or the COMS calibration drift exceeds two times the limit in the applicable performance specification in the relevant standard. When

a CMS is out of contro l, the owner/operator shall take the necessary corrective action and repeat all necessary tests which indicate that the system is out of control. The owner/operator shall take corrective action and conduct retesting until the performance requirements are b elow the applicable limits. The beginning of the out

- of

- control period is the hour that the owner/operator conducts a performance check (e.g., calibration drift) that indicates an exceedance of performance requirements. The end of the out

- of

control period is the hour following the completion of corrective action and successful demonstration that the system is within the allowable limits. During the period the CMS is out of control, recorded data shall not be used in data averages and calculations, or to me et any established data availability requirement.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 53 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.2(l) Records of CMS Malfunction or Inoperative Periods

(40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(b)(2)(vi )) The owner/operator shall record each period during which a CMS required by 40CFR63 Subpart LLL is malfunctioning or inoperative (including out

- of

- control periods). These records shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years following the date of each CMS malfunction or inoperative period. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records shall be

retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on

microfiche.

6.B.2(m) Records of All Required CMS Measurements

(40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(c)(1)) The owner/operator shall record all required CMS measurements (including monitoring data recorded during unavoidable CMS breakdowns and out

- of

control periods) for CMS required by 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. These records shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years following the date of each CMS measurement. At a minimum, the most r ecent two(2) years of records shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may

be retained off

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on micr ofiche.

6.B.2(n) Records of the Date and Time that Identify Inoperative CMS Periods

(40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(c)(5)) The owner/operator shall record the date and time identifying each calendar period during which a CMS required by 40CFR63 Subpart LLL is inoperative except for zero (low

- level) and high

- level checks. These records shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years following the date of each inoperative CMS period. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records

shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks,

or on microfiche.

6.B.2(o) Records of the Date and Time that Identify Out of Control CMS Periods

(40CFR63.8(c)(7), 40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(c)(6)) The owner/operator shall record the date and time identifying each calendar period during which a CMS required by 40CFR63 Subpart LLL is out of

con trol. A CMS is out of control if the zero (low

- level), mid

- level (if applicable), or high

- level calibration drift exceeds two(2) times the applicable calibration drift specification in the applicable performance specification or in the relevant standard, t he CMS fails a performance test audit (e.g., cylinder gas audit), relative accuracy audit, relative accuracy test audit, or linearity test audit; or the COMS calibration drift exceeds two times the limit in the applicable performance specification in the r elevant standard. These records shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years following the date of each out of control CMS period. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on

- site and on

- file.

Records for the rema ining three(3) years may be retained off

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

6.B.2(p) Records of Total Process Operating Time During the Reporting Period

(4 0CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(c)(13)) The owner/operator shall record the total process operating time during the reporting period for sources subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. These records shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years following the date of each record. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on compute r floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 54 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.2(q) Records of the Specific Identification of Each Period of Excess Emissions and Parameter Monitoring

Exceedances (40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(c)(8)) The owner/operator shall record the specific identification (i.e., the date and time of commencement and completion) of each period of excess emissions and parameter monitoring exceedances, as defined 40CFR63 Subpart LLL that occurs during startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions of the affected source and occurs during periods other than startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions of the affected source. These records shall be retained for a calendar p eriod of five(5) years following the date of each exceedance. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records

shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks,

or on microfiche.

6.B.2(r) Records of CMS Malfunctions, Corrective Actions and Repairs

(40CFR63.10(b)(1), 40CFR63.19(c)(10), 40CFR63.10(c)(11), 40CFR63.10(c)(12) and 40CFR63.10(c )(15))

The owner/operator shall record the nature and cause of any CMS malfunction (if known), the corrective action taken or preventive measures adopted and the nature of the repairs or adjustments to the CMS that was inoperative or out of control for any CMS required by 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. In order to satisfy these recordkeeping requirements and to avoid duplicative recordkeeping efforts, the owner/operator may use the affected source's Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan or records kept to satisfy the recordkeeping requirements of the Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Plan provided that such plan and records adequately address the recordkeeping requirements this condition. These records shall be retained for a calendar period of five(5) years follo wing the date of each malfunction, corrective action and/or repair. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off

- site. Such records may be maintain ed on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

6.B.2(s) Records of All CMS Measurements Needed to Demonstrate Compliance With A Relevant Standard

(40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(b)(2)(vii)) The owner/ operator shall record all required measurements needed to demonstrate compliance with 40CFR63 Subpart LLL

. To demonstrate compliance with that subpart, the records shall include, but are not limited to, 15

- minute averages of CMS data, raw performance

testi ng measurements and raw performance evaluation measurements that support the data that the owner/operator is required to report. Where a CEMS is automated and the calculated data averages do not exclude periods of CEMS breakdown or malfunction, in lieu of maintaining a file of all CEMS subhourly,

the owner/operator shall retain the most recent consecutive three averaging periods of subhourly measurements and a file that contains a hard copy of the data acquisition system algorithm used to reduce

the measur ed data into the reportable form of the standard. An automated CEMS is defined as a CEMS that records and reduces the measured data to the form of the pollutant emission standard through the use of a computerized data acquisition system. Where the measured data from a CEMS is manually reduced to obtain the reportable form of the standard, and the calculated data averages do not exclude periods of CEMS breakdown or malfunction, in lieu of maintaining a file of all CEMS subhourly measurements, the owner/opera tor shall retain all subhourly measurements for the most recent reporting period. The subhourly measurements shall be retained for 120 calendar days from the date of the most recent Summary or Excess Emission Report submitted to the Department The Departme nt, upon notification, may require the Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) to maintain all measurements if it determines these records are required to more accurately assess the compliance status of the affected source These records shall be

ret ained for a calendar period of five(5) years following the date of each measurement. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off

- site. Such record s may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 55 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.2(t) Reduction of COMS and CEMS D ata

(63CFR63.2 and 40CFR63.8(g)(2)) The owner/operator shall for a COMS reduce all data to 6

- minute averages calculated from 36 or more data points equally spaced over each 6

- minute period. Data from CEMS for measurement other than opacity, unless otherwis e specified in a relevant standard, shall be reduced to one(1)

- hour averages computed from four or more data points equally spaced over each one(1)

- hour period, except during periods when calibration, quality assurance, or maintenance activities are being performed. During periods when calibration, quality assurance, or maintenance activities are being performed, a valid hourly average shall consist of at least two data points with each representing a 15

- minute period. Alternatively, an arithmetic or integr ated 1

- hour average of CEMS data may be used. A six(6)

- minute period is defined as, with respect to opacity determinations, any one of the 10 equal parts of a one(1)

- hour period. A one(1)

- hour period, unless otherwise defined in an applicable subpart, is d efined as any 60

- minute period commencing on the hour.

6.B.2(u) Emission Data Units of Measurement

(40CFR63.8(g)(4)) All emission data shall be converted into the units of measurement of the relevant standard for reporting purposes using the conversion p rocedures specified in that standard. After conversion, the data may be rounded to the same number of significant digits as used in that standard to specify the emission limit (e.g., rounded to the nearest 1% opacity).

6.B.2(v) Use of Monitoring Data Rec orded During Periods of Unavoidable CMS Breakdowns, Out

- Of

- Control Periods, Repairs, Maintenance Periods, Calibration Checks and Zero (Low

- Level) and High

- Level Adjustments (40CFR63.8(g)(5)) Monitoring data recorded during periods of unavoidable CMS

breakd owns, out

- of

- control periods, repairs, maintenance periods, calibration checks, and zero (low

- level) and high

- level adjustments shall not be included in any computed data average. If the owner/operator complies with the requirements of 63.10(b)(2)(vii)(A) or 63.10(b)(2)(vii)(B) (condition 6.B.2(s)), data averages shall include any data recorded during periods of monitor breakdown or malfunction.

6.B.2(w) Request to Reduce Frequency of Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Reports

(40CFR63.10(e)(3)(ii)) Not withstanding the frequency of reporting requirements specified in condition 6.B.2(ee), if the owner/operator is required by a relevant standard to submit Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Reports and/or Summary Reports on a quarterly (or more frequent) basis, it may reduce the frequency of reporting for that standard to semiannual if the requirements of paragraphs (w)(1) through (w)(3) are met.

(w)(1) If for one full year (e.g., 4 quarterly or 12 monthly reporting periods) the affected source's excess emissions and CMS Performance Reports continually demonstrate that the source is in compliance with

the relevant standard.

(w)(2) The owner/operator continues to comply with all applicable recordkeeping and monitoring requirements.

(w)(3) The Departme nt does not object to a reduced frequency of reporting for the affected source.

6.B.2(x) Recording of CMS Data

(40CFR63.8(g)(3)) The monitoring data obtained from CMS may be recorded in reduced or nonreduced form (e.g., ppm pollutant and percent O 2 or ng /J of pollutant).

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 56 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.2(y) Content and Submittal Dates for Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Reports

(40CFR63.8(c)(7), 40CFR63.8(c)(8), 40CFR63.10(c)( 5), 40CFR63.10(c)(6), 40CFR63.10(c)(7), 40CFR63.10(c)(8), 40CFR63.10(c)(10), 40CFR63.10(c)(11), 40CFR63.10(c)(12), 40CFR60.10(c)(13), and 40CFR63.10(e)(3)(v)) All Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Reports and all Summary Reports, if required, shall be d elivered or postmarked by the 30th day following the end of each calendar half or quarter, as appropriate to the Manager of the Technical Management Section, Bureau of Air Quality. Written reports of excess emissions or exceedances of process or control sy stem parameters shall include all the information as specified in paragraphs (y)(1) through (y)(10). When no excess emissions or exceedances of a parameter have occurred, or a CMS has not been inoperative, out of control, repaired, or adjusted, such

inform ation shall be stated in the report.

(y)(1) The reports shall contain the name, title, and signature of the responsible official who is certifying the accuracy of the report.

(y)(2) The date and time identifying each period during which the CMS was inope rative except for zero (low

- level) and high

- level checks.

(y)(3) The date and time identifying each period during which the CMS was out of control. A CMS is out of control if the zero (low

- level), mid

- level (if applicable), or high

- level calibration drif t exceeds two times the applicable calibration drift specification in the applicable performance specification or in the relevant standard, the CMS fails a performance test audit (e.g., cylinder gas audit), relative accuracy audit, relative

accuracy test a udit, or linearity test audit; or the COMS calibration drift exceeds two times the limit in the applicable performance specification in the relevant standard.

(y)(4) The specific identification (i.e., the date and time of commencement and completion) of e ach period of excess emissions and parameter monitoring exceedances, as defined in the relevant standard(s), that occurs during startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions of the affected source.

(y)(5) The specific identification (i.e., the date and time of co mmencement and completion) of each time period of excess emissions and parameter monitoring exceedances, as defined in the relevant standard(s), that occurs during periods other than startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions of the affected source.

(y)(6) The nature and cause of any malfunction (if known).

(y)(7) The corrective action taken or preventive measures adopted.

(y)(8) The nature of the repairs or adjustments to the CMS that was inoperative or out of control.

(y)(9) The total process operating tim e during the reporting period.

(y)(10) All information concerning CMS out

- of

- control periods, including start dates, end dates, hours and descriptions of the corrective actions taken.

6.B.2(z) Records of Procedures that are Part of a CMS Quality Control Program

(40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(c)(14)) The owner/operator shall record all procedures that are part of a quality control program developed and implemented for CMS subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. The record of procedures shall be retained for a c alendar period of five(5) years following the origin date of each procedure. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained off

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 57 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.2(aa) Summary Report Content Requirements

( 40CFR63.10(e)(3)(vi) and 40CFR63.1354(b)(9)) If required to submit a Summary Report, the owner/operator shall submit one Summary Report for the hazardous air pollutants monitored at each affected source (unless the relevant standard specifies that more tha n one summary report is required, e.g., one summary report for each hazardous air pollutant monitored). The summary report shall be entitled “Summary Report (Gaseous and Opacity Excess Emission and CMS Performance)” and contain the information specified b y paragraphs (aa)(1) through (aa)(16).

(aa)(1) The company name and address of the affected source.

(aa)(2) An identification of each hazardous air pollutant monitored at the affected source.

(aa)(3) The beginning and ending dates of the reporting perio d.

(aa)(4) A brief description of the process units.

(aa)(5) T he emission and operating parameter limitations specified in the relevant standard(s).

(aa)(6) The monitoring equipment manufacturer(s) and model number(s).

(aa)(7) The date of the latest CM S certification or audit.

(aa)(8) The total operating time of the affected source during the reporting period.

(aa)(9) An emission data summary (or similar summary if it monitors control system parameters), including the total

duration of excess emission s during the reporting period (recorded in minutes for opacity and hours for gases), the total duration of excess emissions expressed as a percent of the total source operating time during that reporting period, and

a breakdown of the total duration of exc ess emissions during the reporting period into those that are due to startup/shutdown, control equipment problems, process problems, other known causes, and other unknown causes.

(aa)(10) A CMS performance summary (or similar summary if it monitors contro l system parameters), including the total CMS downtime during the reporting period (recorded in minutes for opacity and hours for gases), the total duration of CMS downtime expressed as a percent of the total source operating time during that reporting per iod, and a breakdown of the total CMS downtime during the reporting period into periods that are due to monitoring equipment malfunctions, nonmonitoring equipment malfunctions, quality assurance/quality control calibrations, other known causes, and other unknown causes.

(aa)(11) A description of any changes in CMS, processes, or controls since the last reporting period.

(aa)(12) The name, title, and signature of the responsible official who is certifying the accuracy of the report and the date of the rep ort.

(aa)(13) All exceedences of maximum control device inlet gas temperature limits specified in condition 6.B.12(j).

(aa)(14) All failures to calibrate thermocouples and other temperature sensors as required by condition 6.B.12(a)

(aa)(15) The resul ts of any combustion system component inspections conducted within the reporting period as required by condition 6.B.12(h).

(aa)(16) All failures to comply with any provision of the Operation and Maintenance plan specified by condition 6.B.10(a).

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 58 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONIT ORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.2(bb) Submission of Only the Summary Report

(40CFR63.10(e)(3)(vii)) If the total duration of excess emissions or process or control system parameter

exceedances for the reporting period is less than 1% of the total operating time for the reporting period and CMS downtime for the reporting period is less than 5% of the total operating time for the reporting period, the owner/operator only needs to submit the Summ ary Report and the full Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Report need not be submitted unless required by the Department.

6.B.2(cc) Reduction in the Frequency of Submitting Excess Emissions and CMS Performance and/or Summary Reports

(40CFR63.10(e)(3)( iii)) The frequency of submitting Excess Emissions and CMS Performance and/or Summary Reports required to comply with a relevant standard may be reduced only after the owner/operator notifies the Department in writing of its intention to make such a chan ge and the Department does not object to the intended change. In deciding whether to approve a reduced frequency of reporting, the Department may review information concerning a source's entire previous performance history during the five(5) year recordkee ping period prior to the intended change, including performance test results, monitoring data, and evaluations of the owner/operator conformance with operation and maintenance requirements. Such information may be used by the Department to make a judgment about a source's potential for noncompliance in the future. If the Department disapproves the owner/operator request to reduce the frequency of reporting, the Department will notify it in writing within 45 calendar days after receiving notice of the owner/ operator intention. The notification from the Department to the owner/operator will specify the grounds on which the disapproval is based. In the absence of a notice of disapproval within 45 calendar days, approval is automatically granted.

6.B.2(dd) Sub mission of Both the Summary Report and the Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Report

(40CFR63.10(e)(3)(viii)) If the total duration of excess emissions or process or control system parameter exceedances for the reporting period is 1% or greater of the to tal operating time for the reporting period, or the total CMS downtime for the reporting period is 5% or greater of the total operating time for the reporting period, then owner/operator shall submit both the Summary Report and the Excess Emissions and CM S Performance Report.

6.B.2(ee) Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Reports and/or Summary Reports

(40CFR63.10(e)(3)(i)) For sources subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL required by that subpart to be monitored by a CMS, the owner/operator shall submit an Ex cess Emissions and CMS Performance Report and/or a Summary Report to the Department for those CMS. Reports shall be submitted Semiannually, except when more frequent reporting is specifically required by a relevant standard and the Department determines on a case

by

- case basis that more frequent reporting is necessary to accurately assess the compliance status of a source.

6.B.2(ff) Resumption of the Normal Frequency of Submitting Excess Emissions and CMS Performance and/or Summary

Reports (40CFR63.10(e)( 3)(iv)) As soon as CMS data indicate that a source is not in compliance with any applicable emission limitation or operating parameter, the frequency of reporting for Excess Emissions and CMS Performance and/or Summary Reports shall revert to the original submission frequency and the owner/operator shall submit an Excess Emissions and CMS Performance and/or Summary Report for the noncomplying emission points at the next appropriate reporting period following the noncomplying event. After demonstrating ong oing compliance with the applicable emission limitation or operating parameter for another full year, the owner/operator may again request approval from the Department to reduce the submission frequency of reporting for that standard.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 59 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.3(a) Air Pollution Control and Monitoring Equipment Maintenance Records

(40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(b)(2)(iii)) The owner/operator shall record all required maint enance performed on the air pollution control and monitoring equipment required by 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three(3) years may be retained of f

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

6.B.3(b) Operation and Maintenance of Air Pollution Control Equipment

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(3)(i)(B)) The owner /operator shall maintain the differential pressure across each dust collector between the Department approved differential pressure ranges as specified in Tables 1 and 2 of the Air Pollution Control Device Operations and Maintenance Plan. The differential pressure of each dust collector shall be monitored and recorded concurrently with visible emission monitoring. If the differential pressure of a dust collector deviates from the specified differential pressure range, then the owner/operator shall perform a nd record a visual emission observation and a reason for the deviation from the specified pressure range. If the visual emission observation exceeds the opacity limit for the source(s) then the Emergency Response Protocol of the plan shall be followed. All visible emissions monitoring, inspections, reporting, recordkeeping and preventative maintenance shall be performed as specified by the Air Pollution Control Device Operations and Maintenance Plan. If a problem is found during an inspection

of a dust coll ector, then the inspection shall be documented and include the date and time of inspection, list the problem(s) found and the corrective action(s) taken. All records shall be kept on

- file and on

- site for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date of record and made available to Department personnel upon

request.

6.B.3(c) Records of the Occurrence and Duration of Air Pollution Control and Monitoring Equipment Malfunctions

(40CFR63.10(b)(1) and 40CFR63.10(b)(2)(ii)) The owner/operator shall record the occurrence and duration of each malfunction of the air pollution control and monitoring equipment required by 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. At a minimum, the most recent two(2) years of records shall be retained on

- site and on

- file. Records for the remaining three (3) years may be retained off

- site. Such records may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on computer floppy disks, on magnetic tape disks, or on microfiche.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 60 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( REGULATION APPLICABILITY DETERMINA TIONS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.4(a) Recordkeeping Requirement for Regulation Applicability Determinations

(40CFR63.10(b)(3)) If the owner/operator determines that a stationary source that emits (or has the potential to emit, without considering controls) one or more hazardous air pollutants regulated by any standard established pursuant to Clean Air Act Section 112(d) or Clean Air Act Section 112(f) and that stationary source is in the source category regulated by the relevant standard, but that source is not subject to the relevant standard (or other requirement established under 40CFR63) because of limitations on the source's potential to emit or an exclusion, then the owner/operator shall keep a record of the applicability

determination on

- sit e and on

- file for a calendar period of five(5) years after the determination, or until the source changes its operations to become an affected source, whichever comes first. The record of applicability determination shall also be signed by the person makin g the determination and include an analysis (or other information) that demonstrates why the owner/operator believes the source is unaffected (e.g., because the source is an area source). The analysis (or other information) shall be sufficiently detailed

t o allow the Department to make a finding about the source's applicability status with regard to the relevant standard or other requirement. If relevant, the analysis shall be performed in accordance with requirements established in 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. Als o, if relevant, the analysis should be performed in accordance with EPA guidance materials published to assist sources in making applicability determinations under Clean Air Act Section 112, if any.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CMS PERFORMANCE E VALUATIONS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.5(a) CMS Performance Evaluations

(40CFR63.8(e)(1)) During the pollutant performance tests required by conditions 6.B.6(a) through 6.B.6(bb) and at any other time the Department may require, the owner/operator fo r an affected source being monitored by a CMS shall conduct a performance evaluation of that CMS. Such performance evaluation shall be conducted according to the applicable specifications and procedures described in conditions 6.B.7(b) through 6.B.7(h) or in the relevant standard.

6.B.5(b) Notification of CMS Performance Evaluations

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section IV(D)(2) and 40CFR63.8(e)(2)) The owner/operator shall notify the Manager of the Source Evaluation Section, Bureau of Air Quality in writing of the date of the CMS performance evaluation simultaneously with the notification of the pollutant performance test date or at least 60 calendar days prior to the date the CMS performance evaluation is scheduled to begin if no pollutant performance test is required. In the event the owner/operator is unable to conduct the CMS performance evaluation on the date specified in the notification, it shall notify the Department as soon as practical by telephone and follow up in writing within 30 calendar days. Tele phone notification shall include a description of the circumstance(s) causing the cancellation of the CMS performance evaluation and a projected date that the evaluation will take place. The written follow

- up report shall include a description of the cond ition(s) which prevented the evaluation from being conducted, and when applicable, what corrective action was performed, or what equipment repairs were required.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 61 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.5(c) Content of CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section IV(C), 40CFR63.8(e)(3)(i) and 40CFR63.8(e)(3)(ii)) Before conducting a required CMS performance evaluation, the owner/operator shall develop a site specifi c CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan. The CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan shall include the applicable information specified by 6.B.8(c), evaluation program objectives, an evaluation program summary, the performance evaluation schedule, data quality objectives and both an internal and external QA program. Data quality objectives are the pre

- evaluation expectations of precision, accuracy, and completeness of data. The internal QA program shall include, at a minimum, the activities planned by routine operators and analysts to provide an assessment of CMS performance. The external QA program shall include, at a minimum, systems audits that include the opportunity for on

- site evaluation by the Department of instrument calibration, data

validation

, sample logging and documentation of quality control data and field maintenance activities.

6.B.5(d) Submission of CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section IV(B), 40CFR63.8(e)(3)(iii) and 40CFR63.8(e)(3)(iv)) The owner/operator

shall submit a site

- specific CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan to the Manager of the Source Evaluation Section, Bureau of Air Quality for approval at least 60 calendar days before a required Pollutant Performance Test or CMS performance evaluation is schedule d to begin, or on a mutually agreed upon date. The review and approval of the CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan by the Department will occur with the review and approval of the site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan. The Department may request

ad ditional relevant information after the submittal of a plan.

6.B.5(e) Department Approval of the CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section IV(B) and 40CFR63.7(c)(3)) The Department will notify the owner/operator of approval or i ntention to deny approval of the site

- specific CMS Performance Evaluation Test Plan within 30 calendar days after receipt of the original plan and within 30 calendar days after receipt of any supplementary information. Before disapproving the plan, the Dep artment will notify the owner/operator of its intention to disapprove the plan together with a notice of the information and findings on which the intended disapproval is based and a notice of opportunity for the owner/operator to present,
within 30 calen dar days after it is notified of the intended disapproval, additional information to the Department before final action on the plan.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 62 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B. 5(f) Department Failure to Approve or Disapprove a CMS Performance Evaluation Plan

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section IV(B), 40CFR63.8(e)(3)(v) and 40CFR63.8(e)(3)(vi)) In the event that the Department fails to approve or disapprove a site

- specific CMS Perform ance Evaluation Test Plan within the time period specified in condition 6.B.7(e) and the owner/operator intends to demonstrate compliance using the monitoring method(s) specified in the relevant standard, it shall conduct the CMS performance

evaluation wi thin the specified time using the specified method(s) in the relevant standard. If the owner/operator intends to demonstrate compliance by using an alternative to a monitoring method specified in the relevant standard, it shall refrain from conducting th e CMS performance evaluation until the Department approves the use of the alternative method. If the Department does not approve the use of the alternative method within 30 calendar days before the CMS performance evaluation is scheduled to begin,

the CMS performance evaluation deadlines specified condition 6.B.7(g) may be extended such that the owner/operator shall conduct the CMS performance evaluation within 60 calendar days after the Department approves the use of the alternative method. Neither the sub mission of a site

- specific CMS Performance Evaluation Test Pan for approval, nor the Department’s approval or disapproval of a plan, nor the Department’s failure to approve or disapprove a plan in a timely manner shall relieve the owner/operator of legal responsibility for compliance with any applicable provisions or with any other applicable Federal, State, or local requirement; or prevent the Department from implementing, enforcing or taking any other action under the Clean Air Act.

6.B.5(g) Conduct of CMS Performance Evaluations and CMS Performance Evaluation Dates

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section IV(D) and 40CFR63.8(e)(4)) The owner/operator shall conduct a performance evaluation of a required CMS during any required Pollutant Performance Test in accor dance with the applicable performance specification as specified in the relevant standard and if applicable, SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Section IV(D). Notwithstanding the requirement in the previous sentence, if the owner/operator for an affected source elects to submit COMS data for compliance with a relevant opacity emission standard, it shall conduct a performance evaluation of the COMS as specified in the relevant standard, before the required pollutant performance test is conducted in time to submit the res ults of the CMS performance evaluation as specified in condition 6.B.7(h). If a Pollutant Performance Test is not required or the requirement for a Pollutant Performance Test has been waived, the owner/operator for an

affected source shall conduct the CMS performance evaluation no later than 180 calendar days after the appropriate compliance date for the affected source as specified in the relevant standard.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS)

Condition

Number Condition

6. B.5(h) Reporting of CMS Performance Evaluation Results

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section (F) and 40CFR63.8(e)(5)) The owner/operator shall furnish the Department with a written report of the results of the CMS performance evaluation simultaneously with the re sults of the Pollutant Performance Test or within 60 calendar days of completion of the CMS performance evaluation if no pollutant performance test is required, unless otherwise specified in a relevant standard. The report of performance results shall cont ain the applicable information specified in condition 6.B.8(m) and include the raw data from the CMS performance evaluation. If the owner/operator uses a COMS to determine opacity compliance during any required pollutant performance test, it shall furnish the Department with two(2) or, upon request, three(3) copies of a written report of the results of the required COMS performance evaluation. The copies shall be provided to the Manager of the Source Evaluation Section, Bureau of Air Quality at least 15 ca lendar days before the required pollutant performance test is

conducted.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 63 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.5(i) Alternative to the CEMS Relative Accuracy Test

(40CFR63.8(f)(6)(i)) An alternative to the test method for determining CEMS relative accuracy is available

for affected sour ces with emission rates demonstrated to be less than 50% of the relevant standard. The owner/operator may petition the Department to substitute the CEMS relative accuracy test in Section 7 of Performance Specification 2 with the procedures in Section 10 if the results of a Pollutant Performance Test or other tests performed demonstrate that the emission rate of the pollutant of interest in the units of the relevant standard is less than 50% of the relevant standard. For affected sources subject to emissio n limitations expressed as control efficiency levels, the owner/operator may petition the Department to substitute the CEMS relative accuracy test with the procedures in Section 10 of Performance Specification

2 if the control device exhaust emission rate is less than 50% of the level needed to meet the control efficiency requirement. The alternative procedures do not apply if the CEMS is used continuously to determine compliance with a relevant standard.

6.B.5(j) Department Rescission of Approval to use the Alternative to the CEMS Relative Accuracy Test

(40CFR63.8(f)(6)(iii)) The Department will review its permission to use an alternative to the CEMS relative accuracy test and may rescind such permission if the CEMS data from a successful completion of t he alternative relative accuracy procedure indicate that the affected source's emissions are approaching the level of the relevant standard. The criterion for reviewing the permission is that the collection of CEMS data

shows that emissions have exceeded 7 0% of the relevant standard for any averaging period, as specified in the relevant standard. For affected sources subject to emission limitations expressed as control efficiency levels, the criterion for reviewing the permission is that the collection of C EMS data shows that exhaust emissions have exceeded 70% of the level needed to meet the control efficiency requirement for any averaging period, as specified in the relevant standard. The owner/operator for an affected source shall

maintain records and det ermine the level of emissions relative to the criterion for permission to use an alternative for relative accuracy testing. If this criterion is exceeded, then the owner/operator shall notify the Department within 10 calendar days of such occurrence and in clude a description of the nature and cause of the increased emissions. The Department will review the notification and may rescind permission to use an alternative and require the owner/operator to conduct a relative accuracy test of the CEMS as specified in Section 7 of Performance Specification 2.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.5(k) Content of Petition to use the Alternative to the CEMS Relative Accuracy Test

(40CFR63.8(f)(6)(ii)) The petition to use an alternative to the relative accuracy test shall include a detailed description of the procedures to be applied, the location and the procedure for conducting the alternative, the concentration or response levels of the alternative relat ive accuracy materials, and the other equipment checks included in the alternative procedure(s). The Department will review the petition for completeness and applicability. The Department's determination to approve an alternative will depend on the intende d use of the CEMS data and may require specifications more stringent than in Performance Specification 2.

6.B.5(l) PM CEMS Correlation Tests

(40CFR63.1357(a) and 40CFR63.1357(e)) If the owner/operator is conducting PM CEMS correlation tests (that is, cor relation with manual stack methods) it is exempt from any particulate matter and opacity standards of 40CFR63 Subpart LLL that are applicable to the Rotary Kiln. It is also exempt from any permit or other emissions, operating parameter or other limitation on workplace practices that are applicable to the Rotary Kiln to ensure compliance with any particulate matter and opacity standards of 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. The particulate matter and opacity standards and associated operating limits and conditions will no t be waived for more than 96 hours, in the aggregate, for a correlation test, including all runs and conditions.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 64 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS ( CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.5(m) Content and Submission of PM CEMS Correlation Test Plan

(40CFR63.1357(b)) The owner/operator shall develop a PM CEMS correlation tes t plan. The plan shall t be submitted to the Department for approval at least 90 calendar days before the correlation test is scheduled to be conducted and include the applicable information contained in condition 6.B.8(c) and in (m)(1) through (m)(4) of t his condition.

(m)(1) The number of test conditions and the number of runs for each test condition.

(m)(2) The target particulate matter emission level for each test condition.

(m)(3) How the operation of the affected source will be modified to attain t he desired particulate matter

emission rate.

(m)(4) The anticipated normal particulate matter emission level.

6.B.5(n) Stack Sampling Team and PM CEMS Correlation Tests

(40CFR63.1357(d)) The stack sampling team shall be on

- site and prepared to perform P M CEMS correlation testing no later than 24 hours after operations are modified to attain the desired particulate matter emissions concentrations, unless the correlation test plan documents that a longer period is appropriate.

MONITORING AND REPORTING C ONDITIONS ( CMS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.5(o) Department Approval or Disapproval of the PM CEMS Test Plan

(40CFR63.7(c)(3)(i), 40CFR63.7(c)(3)(iii) and (40CFR63.1357(c)) The Department will review and approve or disapprove the PM CEMS Correlation Test Plan. The Department will notify the owner/operator of approval or intention to deny approval of the plan within 30 calendar days after receipt of the original plan and within 30 calendar days after receipt of any supplementary information. Before disapproving any PM CEMS Correlation Test Plan, the Department will notify the owner/operator of its intention to disapprove the plan together with a notice of the information and findings on which the intended disapproval is based and a notice of opportunity for the owner/operator to present, within 30 calendar days after it is notified of the intended disapproval, additional information to the Department before final action on the plan. If the Department fails to approve or disappr ove the PM CEMS Correlation Test Plan within the specified time period the plan shall be considered approved, unless the Department has requested

additional information.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 65 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condi tion

Number Condition

6.B.6(a) Notification of Pollutant Performance Test

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section IV(D), 40CFR63.7(b)(1) and 40CFR63.7(b)(2)) For the Pollutant Performance Tests required by conditions 6.B.8(w) through 6.B.8(bb), the owner/operator shall notify the Department in writing of its intention to conduct a test at least 60 calendar days before it is initially scheduled to begin. In the event the owner/operator is unable to conduct the pollutant performance test on the date specified in the notification, it shall notify the Department as soon as practical by telephone and follow up in writing within 30 calendar days. Telephone notification shall include a description of the circumstance(s) causing the cancellation of the pollution performance test and a projected retest date. The

written follow

- up report shall include a description of the condition(s) which prevented the evaluation from being conducted, and when applicable, what corrective action was performed, or what equipment repairs

were r equired. This notification of delay in conducting the pollutant performance test shall not relieve the owner/operator of legal responsibility for compliance with any other applicable provisions of this part or with any other applicable Federal, State, or l ocal requirement, nor will it prevent the Department from implementing, enforcing or taking any other action under the Clean Air Act.

6.B.6(b) Submission of Pollutant Performance Test Plan

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section IV(B),40CFR63.7(c)(2(iv) and 40CF R63.7(c)(2)(v)) The owner/operator

shall submit a site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan to the Manager of the Source Evaluation Section, Bureau of Air Quality for approval at least 60 calendar days before the pollutant performance test or CMS perf

ormance evaluation is scheduled to begin, or on a mutually agreed upon date. The Department may request additional relevant information after the submittal of the plan.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 66 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORM ANCE TESTING)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.6(c) Content of the Pollutant Performance Test Plan

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section IV(C), SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Section IV(E), 40CFR63.7(a), 40CFR63.7(c)(2)(i), 40CFR63.7(c)(2)(ii), 40CFR63.7(c)(2)(iii) and 40 CFR63.1349(a)) Before conducting a required Pollutant Performance Test, the owner/operator , for an affected source, shall develop and submit a

site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan for approval to the Manager of the Source Evaluation Section,

Bure au of Air Quality. The Pollutant Performance Test Plan shall include the applicable information in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(40), a test program summary, the test schedule, data quality objectives and both an internal and external QA program. Data qu ality objectives are the pretest expectations of precision, accuracy and completeness of data. The internal QA program shall include, at a minimum, the activities planned by routine operators and analysts to provide an assessment of test data precision (i .e. the sampling and analysis of replicate samples). The external QA program shall include, at a minimum, application of plans for a test method performance audit during the performance test. The performance audits consist of blind audit samples provided b y the Department and analyzed during the performance test in order to provide a measure of test data bias. The external QA program may also include systems audits that include the opportunity for on

- site evaluation by the Department of instrument calibrati on, data validation, sample logging, and documentation of quality control data and field maintenance activities.

(c)(1) Facility name, address, and telephone number, and name of facility contact.

(c)(2) Facility permit number and source identification nu mber.

(c)(3) Name, address, and telephone number of the company contracted to perform the source test.

(c)(4) Name, address, and telephone number of the laboratory contracted to perform the analytical analysis of the Pollutant Performance Test samples.

(c)(5) Description and overall purpose of the tests (i.e. demonstrate compliance, establish emission factors).

(c)(6) Citation of any applicable State or Federal regulation or permit condition requiring the tests.

(c)(7) Description of the process incl uding a description of each phase of batch or cyclic processes, and the time required to complete each phase.

(c)(8) Process design rates and normal operating rates.

(c)(9) Proposed operating rate and conditions for the source test.

(c)(10) Methods inc luding proposed calculations, equations, and other related information that will be used to demonstrate and verify the operating rate during the Pollutant Performance Test.

(c)(11) Description of any air pollution control equipment.

(c)(12) Description of any stack gas or opacity monitoring systems.

(c)(13) Description of all air pollution control monitors (i.e. pressure gauges, flow indicators, cleaning cycle timers, electrostatic precipitator voltage meters) when applicable.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 67 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPO RTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.6(c) (continued) Content of the Pollutant Performance Test Plan (continued)

(c)(14) A list of process and air pollution control operating parameters that will be recorded du ring the tests, the responsible party who will record these readings, and the frequency at which readings will be recorded.

(c)(15) Identification of any risks associated with sampling location and accessibility, toxic releases, electrical hazards, or any other unsafe conditions, and a plan of action to correct or abate these hazards.

(c)(16) List of all necessary or required safety equipment including respirators, safety glasses, hard hats, safety shoes, hearing protection, and other protective equipment

.

(c)(17) Description of sampling and analytical methods to be used.

(c)(18) Number of tests to be conducted and the number of runs comprising a test.

(c)(19) Duration of each test run.

(c)(20) Description of minimum sampling volumes for each test run.

(c)(21) Location where samples will be recovered.

(c)(22) Explanation of how blank and recovery check results and analytical non

- detects will be used in final

emission calculations.

(c)(23) Maximum amount of time a sample will be held after collection prior to analysis.

(c)(24) Method of storing and transporting samples.

(c)(25) Schematics of sampling sites (include stack dimensions and distances upstream and downstream from disturbances).

(c)(26) A description of all emission points, including fugit ive emissions, associated with the process to be tested, and when applicable, the method that will be used to measure or include these emissions during the

Pollutant Performance Test.

(c)(27) Procedure for verifying absence of cyclonic or non

- parallel sta ck gas flow.

(c)(28) Citation of the QA/QC procedures specified in the EPA Reference Methods and the EPA Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume III.

(c)(29) Chain

- of

- custody procedures and copies of chain

- of

- custody form s.

(c)(30) Procedure for conditioning particulate matter filters (before and after testing).

(c)(31) Procedure for conducting leak checks on vacuum lines, pitot tubes, flexible bags, orsats, etc.

(c)(32) Equipment calibration frequencies, ranges, and ac ceptable limits.

(c)(33) Minimum detection limits of analytical instrumentation.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 68 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.6(c) (continued) Content of the Pollutant Performance Test Plan (cont inued)

(c)(34) Names, addresses and responsible persons of all sub

- contracting laboratories and a description of analytical methods to be used, chain

- of

- custody procedures and QA/QC measures.

(c)(35) QA/QC measures associated with the collection and anal ysis of process or raw material samples and the frequency at which these samples will be collected.

(c)(36) Methods for interference and matrix effects checks, and number of replicate analyses.

(c)(37) Methods and concentrations for internal standards (s tandards additions prior to extraction).

(c)(38) Methods and concentrations for surrogate standards (standards additions to collection media prior to sampling).

(c)(39) Methods for recovery checks, field blanks, lab blanks, reagent blanks, proof rinse bl anks and analytical blanks.

(c)(40) Proposed range of recoveries for data acceptability and method of data interpretation if sample recovery is not within the proposed range.

6.B.6(d) Pollutant Performance Test Method Audit Program

(SC Regulation 61

- 62. 1 Section IV(E) and 40CFR63.7(c)(4)) The owner/operator shall analyze performance audit samples during each Pollutant Performance Test. The owner/operator shall request performance audit materials 30 days prior to the test date. Audit materials including c ylinder audit gases may be obtained by contacting the appropriate EPA Regional Office or the Department. The Department will have sole discretion to require any subsequent remedial actions of the owner/operator based on the performance audit results. If t he Department fails to provide the required performance audit materials to the owner/operator in time to analyze the performance audit samples during a performance test, the requirement to conduct a performance audit is waived for that performance test. Wa iver under this condition of the requirement to conduct a performance audit for a particular performance test does not constitute a waiver of the requirement to conduct a performance audit for future required performance tests.

6.B.6(e) Department Approv al of the Pollutant Performance Test Plan

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section IV(B) and 40CFR63.7(c)(3)(i)) The Department will notify owner/operator of approval or intention to deny approval of the site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan within 30

calend ar days after receipt of the original plan and within 30 calendar days after receipt of any supplementary information. Before disapproving any site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan, the Department will notify the owner/operator of its intention to disapprove the plan together with a notice of the information and findings on which the intended disapproval is based and a notice of opportunity for the owner/operator to present, within 30 calendar days after it is notified of the intended disapproval, a dditional information to the Department before final action on the plan.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 69 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.6(f) Department Failure to Approve or Disapprove a Pollutant Performanc e Test Plan

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section IV(B), 40CFR63.7(c)(3)(ii) and 40CFR63.7(c)(3)(iii)) In the event that the Department fails to approve or disapprove the site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan within the time period specified in condition 6.B.8(e) and the owner/operator intends to demonstrate compliance using the test method(s) specified in the relevant standard or with only minor changes to those tests methods, the owner/operator shall conduct the performance test within the specified ti me using the specified method(s).

If the owner/operator intends to demonstrate compliance by using an alternative to any test method specified in the relevant standard, then it is authorized to conduct the performance test using an alternative

test method after the Department approves the use of the alternative method when the Department approves

the site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan or after the alternative method is approved. The owner/operator is authorized to conduct the performance test wit hin 60 calendar days after it is authorized to demonstrate compliance using an alternative test method. Neither the submission of a site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan for approval, nor the Department’s approval or disapproval of a plan, nor

the Department’s failure to approve or disapprove a plan in a timely manner shall relieve the owner/operator of legal responsibility for compliance with any applicable provisions or with any other applicable Federal, State, or local requirement; or prevent th e Department from implementing, enforcing or taking any other

action under the Clean Air Act.

6.B.6(g) Pollutant Performance Testing Facilities

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section IV(D)(6) and 40CFR63.7(d)) Since the owner/operator is required to

conduct Pol lutant Performance Tests, it shall at the Department’s request provide the applicable performance testing facilities as specified by paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(6) of this condition.

(g)(1) Sampling ports adequate for test methods applicable to such so urce. This includes constructing the air pollution control system such that volumetric flow rates and pollutant emission rates can be accurately determined by applicable test methods and procedures and providing a stack or duct free of cyclonic flow

durin g performance tests, as demonstrated by applicable test methods and procedures

(g)(2) Safe sampling platform(s) and/or sites(s)

(g)(3) Safe access to sampling platform(s) and/or site(s).

(g)(4) Utilities for sampling and testing equipment.

(g)(5) Depar tment access to the facility to observe the performance tests.

(g)(6) Equipment and supplies necessary for the safe testing of a source.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 70 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.6 (h) Conduct of Pollutant Performance Tests

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section IV(D)(5) and 40CFR63.7(e)(1)) Unless approved otherwise by the Department, the owner/operator shall ensure that Pollutant Performance Tests are conducted while a source is operating at the maximum expected production rate, other production rate or operating parameter which would result in the highest emissions for the pollutants being tested. Examples of the operating parameters that may effect emission rates are the type and composit ion of raw materials and fuels, isolation of control equipment modules, product types and dimensions, thermal oxidizer combustion temperature and atypical control equipment settings. Operations during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction shall not constitute representative conditions for the purpose of a performance test, nor shall emissions in excess of the level of the relevant standard during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction be considered a

violation of the relevant standard unless otherwise specified in the relevant standard or a determination of noncompliance is made. Upon request, the owner/operator shall make available to the Department such records as may be necessary to determine the conditions of performance tests.

6.B.6(i) Required Number of Pollutant Performance Test Runs

(40CFR63.7 ( e)(3)) Unless otherwise specified in a relevant standard or test method, each Pollutant Performance Test shall consist of three separate runs using the applicable test method. Each run shall be conducted for the time and under the conditions specified in the relevant standard. For the purpose of determining compliance with a relevant standard, the arithmetic mean of the results of the three runs shall apply. Upon receiving approval from the Depar tment, results of a test run may be replaced with results of an additional test run as specified in paragraphs (i)(1) through (i)(4) of this condition.

(i)(1) A sample is accidentally lost after the testing team leaves the site.

(i)(2) Conditions occur i n which one of the three runs must be discontinued because of forced shutdown

(i)(3) Extreme meteorological conditions occur.

(i)(4) Other circumstances occur that are beyond the owner/operator control.

6.B.6(j) Written Request to Use an Alternative Po llutant Performance Test Method

(40CFR63.7(f)(1) and 40CFR63.1358(b)(3)) Until authorized to use an intermediate change, major change or alternative to a performance test method, the owner/operator remains subject to the test method requirements of the rel evant standard. The owner/operator for a required Pollutant Performance Test may use an alternative test method from that specified in a relevant standard provided that it notifies the Manager of the Source Evaluation Section, Bureau of Air Quality of its intention to use an alternative test method at least 60 calendar days before the Pollutant Performance Test is scheduled to begin. In the case of a major change it shall also notify EPA Region IV. The owner/operator shall use 40CFR63 Appendix A

Method 301 to validate the alternative test method. This may include the use of specific procedures of Method 301 if use of such procedures are sufficient to validate the alternative test method. The results of the Method 301 validation process shall be submitted alo ng with the notification of intention and the justification for not using the specified test method in the relevant standard. The owner/operator may submit the information required in this paragraph well in advance of the 60 calendar day deadline to ensure a timely review by the Department in order to meet the performance test date specified in the relevant

standard.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 71 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.6(k) Approval of Alternative Poll utant Performance Test Methods

(40CFR63.7(f)(3), 40CFR63.7(f)(5), 40CFR63.7(f)(6) and 40CFR63.1358(b)(3)) The Department or EPA Region IV (in the case of a major change) will determine whether the owner/operator validation of the proposed alternative test method is adequate and issue an approval or disapproval of the alternative test method. A major change to a test method is a modification to a federally enforceable test method that uses unproven technology or procedures or is an entirely new method (somet imes necessary when the required test method is unsuitable). If the owner/operator intends to demonstrate compliance by using an alternative to any test method specified in the relevant standard, then it is authorized to conduct the performance test using an alternative test method after the Department or EPA Region IV approves the use of the alternative

method. The owner/operator is authorized to conduct the Pollutant Performance Test within 60 calendar days after it is authorized to demonstrate compliance using an alternative test method. Neither the validation and approval process nor the failure to validate an alternative test method shall abrogate the owner/operator responsibility to comply with the applicable requirements. If the owner/operator uses an alternative test method for an affected source during a required Pollutant Performance Test, it shall continue to use the alternative test method for subsequent performance tests until approval is received from the Department or EPA Region IV to use anoth er test method.

6.B.6(l) Dispute of the Results Obtained by the Use of an Alternative Performance Test Method

(40CFR63.7(f) and 40CFR63.1358(b)(3)) If the Department or EPA Region IV (in the case of a major change) finds reasonable grounds to dispute the results obtained by an alternative test method for the purposes of demonstrating compliance with a relevant standard, it may require the use of the test method specified in the relevant standard.

6.B.6(m) Final Written Reporting of Pollutant Performanc e Test Results

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section IV(F) and 40CFR63.7(g)(1)) The owner/operator shall submit a Final Written Report of the final Pollutant Performance Test results to the Department by the close of business on the 30th day following the compl etion of the test, unless an alternative date has been requested in and approved with the site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan prior to testing or is otherwise specified in a

relevant Federal or State standard. The Final Pollutant Performance Test Report for each site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan shall contain, at a minimum, the applicable information specified in paragraphs (m)(1) through (m)(19).

(m)(1) Summary of the results.

(m)(2) Emission calculations and emission rates in units of the applicable standard, permit limit, etc.

(m)(3) Allowable emission rates in units of the applicable standard, permit limit, etc.

(m)(4) Source compliance status.

(m)(5) Process operating rates.

(m)(6) Methods including actual calculations, equat ions and other related information that were used to demonstrate and verify the operating rate during the performance test.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 72 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.6(m) (continued) Final Written Reporting of Pollutant Performance Test Results (continued)

(m)(7) Chain of custody records.

(m)(8) Certification of all reference standards used.

(m)(9) Signature of a responsible facility representative who can verify process operating rates and

parameters.

(m)(10) Legible copies of all raw laboratory data (for example, filter tare and final weights, titrations, chromatograms, spectrograms, analyzer measurements, etc.).

(m)(11) Legible copies of all raw field data (for example, strip charts, field data forms, field calibration forms, etc.).

(m)(12) Legible copies of applicable stack gas or opacity monitoring system readings identified in the approved site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan.

(m)(13) Legible copies of all applicable pro cess and air pollution control operating parameter readings identified in the approved site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan.

(m)(14) Results of all calibrations and QA/QC measures and checks identified in the approved site

- specific

Pollutant Perf

ormance Test Plan.

(m)(15) Results of performance audits.

(m)(16) Description of any deviations from the proposed process operations as approved in the site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan during testing.

(m)(17) Description of any deviations from approved sampling methods/procedures.

(m)(18) Description of any deviations from approved analytical procedures.

(m)(19) Description of any problems encountered during sampling and analysis and an explanation of how

each was resolved.

6.B.6(n) Fai lure of a Pollutant Performance Test

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.1 Section IV(G)) Within 15 calendar days of the submission of a Final Pollutant Performance Test Report that indicates non

- compliance with a relevant standard, the owner/operator shall

submit to t he Department a written plan which includes at a minimum the information specified by paragraphs (n)(1) through (n)(4) of this condition.

(n)(1) The interim actions being taken to minimize emissions pending demonstration of compliance.

(n)(2) The correct ive actions that have been taken or that are proposed to return the source to compliance.

(n)(3) The method that will be used to demonstrate the source has returned to compliance (i.e. retest and proposed date).

(n)(4) Any changes necessary to update the site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan prior to a retest.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 73 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.6(o) Conduct of Pollutant Performance Tests and Reduction of Data

(40CFR63.7(e)(2), 40 CFR63.90 and 40CFR63.1358(b)(3)) Pollutant Performance tests shall be conducted and the data obtained from a Pollutant Performance Test reduced in accordance with the applicable test methods and procedures unless the Department or EPA Region IV determine s otherwise as specified by paragraphs (o)(1) through (o)(4) of this condition.

(o)(1) The Department specifies or approves, in specific cases, the use of a test method with minor changes in methodology Such changes may be approved in conjunction with app roval of the site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan. A minor change to a test method is defined as a modification to a federally enforceable test method that does not decrease the stringency of the emission limitation or standard, has no

national si gnificance (e.g., does not affect implementation of the applicable regulation for other affected sources, does not set a national precedent, and individually does not result in a revision to the test method)

and is site

- specific, made to reflect or accommo date the operational characteristics, physical constraints, or safety concerns of an affected source.

(o)(2) The Department or EPA Region IV approves the use of an intermediate or major change or alternative to a test method the results of which the Depa rtment or EPA Region IV has determined to be adequate for indicating whether a specific affected source is in compliance. A intermediate change to test

method is defined as a within

- method modification to a federally enforceable test method involving “prov en technology” (generally accepted by the scientific community as equivalent or better) that is applied on a

site

- specific basis and that may have the potential to decrease the stringency of the associated emission limitation or standard. Though site

- speci fic, an intermediate change may set a national precedent for a source category and may ultimately result in a revision to the federally enforceable test method. In order to be approved, an intermediate change must be validated according to 40CFR63 Appendix A Method 301 to demonstrate that it provides equal or improved accuracy and precision. A major change to a test method is defined as a modification to a federally enforceable test method that uses “unproven technology or procedures” (not generally accepte d by the scientific community) or is an entirely new method (sometimes necessary when the required test method is unsuitable). A major change to a test method may be site

specific, or may apply to one or more sources or source categories, and will almost a lways set a national precedent. In order to be approved, a major change must be validated according to 40CFR63 Appendix A

Method 301.

(o)(3) The Department or EPA Region IV approves shorter sampling times or smaller sample volumes when necessitated by pr ocess variables or other factors.

(o)(4) The Department waives the requirement for Pollutant Performance Tests because the owner/operator for an affected source has demonstrated by other means to the Department’s satisfaction that the affected

source is i n compliance with the relevant standard.

6.B.6(p) Waiver of a Pollutant Performance Test

(40CFR63.7(h)(1) and 40CFR63.7(h)(2)) Until a waiver of a Pollutant Performance Testing requirement has been granted by the Department, the owner/operator for an aff ected source remains subject to the applicable performance testing requirements in the relevant standard. Individual performance tests may be waived upon written application to the Department if, in its judgment, the source is meeting the relevant

standard (s) on a continuous basis, a source is being operated under an Extension of Compliance or the owner/operator has requested an Extension of Compliance and the Department is still considering that

request.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 74 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.6(q) Request to Waive Pollutant Performance Tests

(40CFR63.7(h)(3)) If a request is made for an Extension of Compliance, the application for a waiver of an

initial Pollutant Performance Test shall acco mpany the information required for the request for an Extension of Compliance. If no Extension of Compliance is requested or if the owner/operator has requested an Extension of Compliance and the Department is s till considering that request, the applicati on for a waiver of an initial Pollutant Performance Test shall be submitted at least 60 calendar days before scheduled date of the performance test if the site

- specific test Pollutant Performance Test Plan is not submitted. If an application for a waiver of a subsequent performance test is made, the application may accompany any required Compliance Progress Report, Compliance Status Report or Excess Emissions and CMS Performance but it shall be submitted at least 60 calendar days before the scheduled date of the performance

test if the site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan is not submitted. Any application for a waiver of a performance test shall include information justifying the owner/operator request for a waiver, such as the

technical or econom ic infeasibility, or the impracticality, of the affected source performing the required test.

6.B.6(r) Department Approval of the Request to Waive a Pollutant Performance Test

(40CFR63.7(h)(4) and 40CFR63.7(h)(5)) The Department will approve or deny a re quest for a waiver of a Pollutant Performance Test when it approves or denies an Extension of Compliance, approves or disapproves a site

- specific Pollutant Performance Test Plan, makes a determination of compliance following the submission of a required Compliance Status Report or Excess Emissions and CMS Performance Report or makes a determination of suitable progress towards compliance following the submission of a Compliance Progress Report, whichever is applicable. Approval of any request to waive a

P ollutant Performance Test shall not abrogate the Department's authority under the Clean Air Act or in any way prohibit the Department from later canceling the waiver. The cancellation will be made only after notice is given to the owner/operator.

6.B.6(s ) Use of a COMS During Pollutant Performance Tests

(40CFR63.6(h)(7)(i) and 40CFR63.10(e)(4)) The owner/operator for an affected source required to be continuously monitored using a COMS shall record the monitoring data produced during a Pollutant

Performan ce Test and shall furnish the Department with a written report of the monitoring results. The report of COMS data shall be submitted simultaneously with the Final Written Report of the Pollutant Performance Test Results as specified in condition 6.B.8(k).

6.B.6(t) Reduction of COMS Data During a Pollutant Performance Test

(40CFR63.6(h)(7)(iii)) For the purposes of determining compliance with an opacity emission standard during a required Pollutant Performance Test using COMS data, the COMS data shall be r educed to six(6)

- minute averages over the duration of the mass emission performance test.

6.B.6(u) Proper Operation of a COMS During a Pollutant Performance Test

(40CFR63.6(h)(7)(iv)) If the owner/operator uses a COMS for compliance purposes it is respon sible for demonstrating that it has complied with the CMS performance evaluation requirements, that the COMS has been properly maintained, operated, and data quality

- assured and that the resulting data have not been altered in any way.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 75 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.6(v) Use of COMS Data in Lieu of 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9 Observations During a Pollutant

Performance Test (40CFR63.6(h)(7)(ii) and 40CFR63.6(h)(7)(v)) Whenever a n opacity emission test method has not been specified in an applicable subpart or the owner/operator is required to conduct 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9 observations for an affected source, it may submit, for compliance purposes, COMS data results produce d during any required Pollutant Performance Test in lieu of Method 9

data. If the owner/operator elects to submit COMS data for compliance with an opacity emission standard, it shall notify the Department in writing of that decision simultaneously with t he notification of the date that a Pollutant Performance Test is scheduled to begin. Once the owner/operator has notified the Department to that effect, the COMS data results will be used to determine opacity compliance during subsequent Pollutant Performa nce Tests unless the owner/operator notifies the Department in writing to the contrary no later than with the notification of the date that a subsequent Pollutant Performance Test is scheduled to begin. Except as provided in this condition, the results of continuous monitoring by a COMS that indicate that the opacity at the time visual observations were made was not in excess of the emission standard are probative but not conclusive evidence of the actual opacity of an emission, provided that the

owner/o perator for an affected source proves that, at the time of the alleged violation, the instrument used was properly maintained, met 40CFR60 Appendix B Performance Specification 1 and that the resulting data have not been altered in any way.

6.B.6(w) Pollu tant Performance Test for Rotary Kiln Dioxin/Furan Emissions

(40CFR63.7(a)(2), 40CFR63.7(g)(3) and 40CFR63.1349(b)(3)) Within 180 calendar days after June 14, 2002, the owner/operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the Rotary Kiln Dioxin/Furan emission limit specified in condition 5.E.2(q) by conducting a performance test for the kiln using 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 23. The owner/operator shall demonstrate initial compliance by conducting separate performance tests while the raw mill of the in

- line kiln/raw mill is under normal operating conditions and

while the raw mill of the in

- line kiln/raw mill is not operating. Each performance test shall consist of three(3) separate runs and each run shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the Rotary Kiln is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The duration of each run shall be at least three(3) hours and the sample volume for each run shall be at least 2.5 dscm (90 dscf). The

concentration shall be determined for each run and the arithmetic average of the concentrations measured for the three(3) runs shall be calculated and used to determine compliance. The temperature at the inlet to the Rotary Kiln shall be continuously recorded during the period of the Method 23 test and the continuous temperature records shall be included in the Final Pollutant Performance Test Report. One(1)

- minute average temperatures shall be calculated for each minute of each run of the test. The run average temperature shal l be calculated for each run, and the average of the run average temperatures shall be determined and included in the performance test report and will determine the applicable temperature limit for condition 6.B.10(a). Pollutant Performance Tests for Dioxi n/Furan emissions shall be repeated every 30 months from the date of the previous performance test. The owner/operator shall conduct each performance test as specified in this condition and according to conditions 6.B.6( a) through 6.B.6(v). A copy of th e test results shall also be kept on

- site and on

- file for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date testing was completed and made available to Department personnel upon request.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 76 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.6(x) Pollutant Performance Tests for Changes in Operations that may Affect Compliance with the Rotary Kiln

Dioxin/Furan Emission Limit (40CFR63.7(g)(3), 40CFR63.1349(e)(1)) and 40CFR63.1349(e)(3)) If the

owner /operator plans to undertake a change in operations that may adversely affect compliance with the Rotary Kiln Dioxin/Furan emission limit specified in condition 5.E.2(o), then it shall conduct a performance test and establish new temperature limit(s) withi n 180 calendar days after the change. In preparation for and while conducting a performance test required by this condition, the owner/operator may operate under the planned operational change conditions for a period not to exceed 360 hours. The owner/o perator shall submit temperature and other monitoring data that are recorded during the pretest operations to the Department. The owner/operator shall provide the Department with a written notice at least 60 calendar days prior to undertaking an operationa l change that may adversely affect compliance with the Dioxin/Furan emission limit or as soon as practicable where 60 calendar days advance notice is not feasible. The written notice shall include a description of the planned change, the emissions standar ds that may be affected by the change and a schedule for completion of the required performance test, including when the planned operational change period would begin. The performance test shall be conducted and completed within 360 hours after the planned operational change period begins. The owner/operator shall conduct the performance test as specified in this condition and according to conditions 6.B.6(a) through 6.B.6(v). A copy of the test results shall also be kept on

- site and on

- file for a calenda r period of five(5) years from the date testing was completed and made available to Department personnel upon request.

6.B.6(y) Pollutant Performance Test for Clinker Cooler PM Emissions

(SC Regulation 62.5 Standard 4 Section XII(A)(2), 40CFR63.7(g)(3), 40CFR63.1349(b)(1)(i) 40CFR63.1349(b)(1)(ii) and 40CFR63.1349(b)(1)(iii)) The owner/operator shall demonstrate compliance with the Clinker Cooler PM emission limit specified by condition 5.E.3(a) by conducting a performance test using 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 5. Each performance test shall consist of three(3) separate runs under the conditions that exist when the Clinker Cooler is operating at the representative performance conditions in accordance with condition 6.B.8(h). Each run shall be conducted fo r at least one(1) hour and the minimum sample volume shall be 0.85 dscm (30 dscf). The average of the three runs shall be used to determine compliance. A determination of the PM collected in the impingers (“back half”) of the Method 5 particulate sampling train is not required to demonstrate initial compliance with the PM standards of this subpart. However, this shall not preclude the Department from requiring a determination of the "back half" for other purposes. Suitable methods shall be used to determi ne the kiln or inline kiln/raw mill feed rate, except for fuels, for each run and the emission rate (E) of PM shall be computed for each run using Equation 1 of condition 6.B.6(z). Pollutant Performance Tests for PM emissions from the Clinker Cooler

shall be repeated every 24 months from the date of the previous performance test. The owner/operator shall conduct each performance test according to conditions 6.B.6(a) through 6.B.6(v). A copy of the test results shall also be kept on

- site and on

- file for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date testing was completed and made available to Department personnel upon request.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 77 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.6(z) Polluta nt Performance Test for Rotary Kiln PM Emissions

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 3 Section VIII(D)(7), SC Regulation 62.5 Standard 4 Section XII(A)(2), 40CFR63.1349(b)(1)(i), 40CFR63.1349(b)(1)(ii), 40CFR63.1349(b)(1)(iii) and 40CFR63.1349(b)(1)(v)

and 63 .1349(e)(2)) The owner/operator shall demonstrate compliance with the Rotary Kiln PM emission limit specified by condition 5.E.2(c) by conducting separate performance tests using 40CFR60 Appendix A

Method 5 while the raw mill of the in

- line kiln/raw mill i s under normal operating conditions and while the

raw mill of the in

- line kiln/raw mill is not operating. Each performance test shall consist of three(3) separate runs under the conditions that exist when the Rotary Kiln is operating at the representative performance conditions in accordance with condition 6.B.8(h). Each run shall be conducted for at least one(1) hour and the minimum sample volume shall be 0.85 dscm (30 dscf). The average of the three runs shall be used to determine compliance. A determina tion of the PM collected in the impingers (“back half”) of the Method 5 particulate sampling train is not required to demonstrate initial compliance with the PM standards of this subpart. However, this shall not preclude the Department from requiring a de termination of the “back half” for other purposes. Suitable methods shall be used to determine the kiln feed rate, except for fuels, for each run and the emission rate of PM shall be computed for each run using Equation 1. The opacity exhibited during the period of the required Method 5 performance tests shall be determined through the use of a

COM. The maximum six

- minute average opacity during the three Method 5 test runs shall be determined during each Method 5 test run, and used to demonstrate initial c ompliance with the applicable visible emission limits. Pollutant Performance tests for PM emissions from the Rotary Kiln shall be repeated every 24 months from the date of the previous performance test. If the owner/operator plans to undertake a change

in operations that may adversely affect compliance with the PM emission limit then it shall conduct a performance test within 180 calendar days after the change. The owner/operator shall conduct each performance test as specified in this condition and accor ding to conditions 6.B.6(a) through 6.B.6(v). A copy of the test results shall also be kept on

- site and on

- file for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date testing was completed and made available to Department personnel upon request.

(1) E = (( C

s )(Q sd ))/P

E = Emission rate of particulate matter, kg/Mg of kiln feed.

C

s = Concentration of PM, kg/dscm.

Q sd = volumetric flow rate of effluent gas, dscm/hr.

P = total kiln feed (dry basis), Mg/hr.

6.B.6(aa) Additional Performance Testing

(40CFR63 .7(a)(3)) The Department reserves the right to require performance testing on any source within

the owner/operator that it deems to be necessary. This includes all sources for which a particulate matter emission limit has been specified and there exists an accurate and approved EPA method for determining particulate matter emissions.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 78 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.6(bb) Pollutant Performance Test for Rotary Kiln and Precalcin er Coal Mill SO 2 , NO

x , CO, HCl, Ni, Cd, Cr, As and Pb

Emissions (SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 3 Section VIII(D)(7), SC Regulation 62.5 Standard 4 Section XII(A)(2) and SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 7(m)(2)) The owner/operator shall demonstrate complia nce with the emission limits in Table 5.27 and 5.29 by conducting a Pollutant Performance Test for SO 2 , NO

x , CO, HCl, Ni, Cd, Cr, As and Pb emissions from the Rotary Kiln. The performance test shall be conducted on the kiln stack and precalciner coal mil l stack concurrently for both the vertical spindle mill on and off modes. The performance test shall also be performed at the maximum percent kiln gas volume. Rotary Kiln fuels used during the performance

test shall be selected to result in the worst case emissions (i.e. use the most polluting fuels). The Pollutant

Performance Test for SO 2 , NO

x , CO, HCl, Ni, Cd, Cr, As and Pb emissions from the Rotary Kiln shall be repeated every 24 months from the date of the previous test. The owner/operator shall conduct each performance test according to conditions 6.B.68(a) through 6.B.6(v). A copy of the test results shall also be kept on

- site and on

- file for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date testing was completed and made available to Department

person nel upon request.

6.B.6(cc) Initial Pollutant Performance Test for Visible Emissions from Sources Subject to 40CFR63.1348

(40CFR63.7(a)(2)(iii), 40CFR63.1349(b)(2) and 40CFR63.1349(c)) Within 180 calendar days after a new source becomes subject to 40CFR6 3.1348 and within 180 calendar days after June 14, 2002 for the sources listed in Tables 6.16 through 6.23, the owner/operator shall conduct an initial Pollutant Performance Test for visible emissions from that equipment. If the Storage A Frame is still be ing used to store clinker on June 10, 2003, the owner/operator shall conduct an initial Pollutant Performance Test for visible emissions from within 180 calendar days from June 10, 2003. If the Storage A Frame begins storing clinker anytime after June 10, 2003, the owner/operator shall conduct an initial Pollutant Performance Test for visible emissions within 180 calendar days of the date that clinker was stored. The initial performance test shall be conducted in accordance with 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9 and under the conditions that exist when the affected sources are operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six(6)

- minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be

used to determine whether a n affected source is in initial compliance with the relevant standard. The duration of the Method 9 test shall be three(3) hours (30 6

- minute averages), except that the test duration may be reduced to one(1)

- hour if there are no individual readings great er than 10% opacity and no more than three readings of 10% for the first one(1)

- hour period. The owner/operator shall conduct each performance test according to conditions 6.B.6( a) through 6.B.6(v). A copy of the test results shall also be kept on

- site an d on

- file for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date testing was completed and made available to Department personnel upon request. This Method 9 test shall be repeated every 60 months from the date that the previous Method 9 test was completed.

6.B.6(dd) Pollutant Performance Test for Rotary Kiln and Precalciner Coal Mill NO

x Emissions

(SC Regulation 62.5 Standard 4 Section XII(A)(2), SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 7(m)(2), SC Regulation 61

- 62.99 Subpart B Section 99.44(b)(1) and SC Regulation 61

- 62.99 Subpart B Section 99.44(c)(3)) The owner/operator shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable NO

x emission limit by conducting a Pollutant

Performance Test for NO

x emissions from the Rotary Kiln. The performance test shall be conducted on t he kiln stack and precalciner coal mill stack concurrently for both the vertical spindle mill on and off modes. The performance test shall also be performed at the maximum percent kiln gas volume. Rotary Kiln fuels used during the performance test shall b e selected to result in the worst case emissions (i.e. use the most polluting fuels). The

Pollutant Performance Test for NO

x emissions from the Rotary Kiln shall be repeated every 12 months from the date of the previous test. The owner/operator shall condu ct each performance test according to conditions 6.B.6(a) through 6.B.6(v). A copy of the test results shall also be kept on

- site and on

- file for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date testing was completed and made available to Department person nel upon request.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 79 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TESTING)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.6 (ee) (In

- Line Kiln/Raw Mill #1 and Precalciner Coal Mill (PCM), associated with Kiln #1) Within 180 days after the

new BACT limit of 0.55 lb/ton of clinker comes into effect, the owner/operator shall conduct a performance test of

the I

- line Kiln/Raw Mill #1PCM, and its associated air pollution control devices in order to verify and record the

non

- methane VOC emission rate. Thereafter, subsequent tests shall be performed at least every 30 months for non

methane VOCs following the initial test, and at such other times as may be required by the Bureau of Air Quality (BAQ) under section 114 of the Clean Air Act. Method 18 and 25A for the VOC emission limit. The source tests shall be conducted while the facility is operating at the m aximum expected production rate or other production rate or operating parameter, which would result in the highest emissions for the pollutants being tested. Source tests conducted under any other conditions may result in production limitations. The owner or operator shall ensure that the source tests are conducted in accordance with requirements listed in SC Regulation 61

- 62.1, Section IV, Source Tests. The Bureau must be notified at least 60 days prior to any source test so that a Bureau representative m ay be present. Source test methodology must be approved by this Bureau.

Nothing in this paragraph is intended or operates to preclude modification to or relief from the source test requirements in this Permit where otherwise authorized by S.C. Code Ann. R. 61

- 62.1, Section IV.

TABLE 6.16 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE EMISSIONS (UNIT ID 02 KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID Source Description

4130000 Raw Mill Feed Belt Conveyor

4132000 Vertical Raw Mill Feed Bin

6101000 Fo ur Stage Preheater

6101020 Precalciner

6129030 2 Clinker Cooler Product Recovery Cyclones

4160000 Four Vertical Raw Mill Cyclones

4127000 Pulverized Ash Silo

4003040 Marl Silo No.2

5001000 Blend Silo

4127000 Raw Meal FK Pump

4172020 Pneumatic Pipin g to Blend Silo

5003010 Blend Silo Airslides

5002000 Kiln Feed Silo

5026000 Raw Meal CP Transfer Pump

5014090 Pneumatic Transfer Piping to Kiln Feed Silo

5016030 Kiln Feed Silo Airslides

5019000 Kiln Feed Elevator

5018000 Kiln Feed Bin

TABLE 6.17 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE EMISSIONS (UNIT ID 03 CLINKER HANDLING EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID Source Description

6125000 Clinker Cooler Heat Exchanger

6125130 Clinker Cooler Screw Conveyors

6133000 Fredenhagen Clinker Conveyor

6138000

6139000

6140000 3 Clinker Elevators

7003010 Clinker Silo No.1

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 80 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 6.17 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE EMISSIONS (UNIT ID 03 CLINKER HANDLING EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID Source Description

7005010 Clinker Silo No.2

TABLE 6.18 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE EMISSIONS (UNIT ID 03 CLINKER HANDLING EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID Source Description

710301 0 Clinker Silo No.21

7105010 Clinker Silo No.22

4001020 Clinker Silo No.31

4002020 Clinker Silo No.32

7003000 Clinker Silo No.1 Belt Transfer Feed

7005000 Clinker Silo No.2 Belt Transfer Feed

7103000 Clinker Silo No.21 Belt Transfer Feed

7105000 Cli nker Silo No.22 Belt Transfer Feed

4001000 Clinker Silo No.31 Belt Transfer Feed

4002000 Clinker Silo No.32 Belt Transfer Feed

6134000 Reclaim Crusher

6156000 Fringe Clinker Silo

7101000 Fringe Clinker Silo Belt Transfer Feed

TABLE 6.19 SOURCES REQU IRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE EMISSIONS (UNIT ID 04 FINISH MILL SYSTEM EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID Source Description

2126000 2 Gypsum Silos

7007000 Gypsum Silo Feed Belt Transfer No.1

7107000 Gypsum Silo Feed Belt Transfer No.2

4007000 Gypsu m Silo Feed Belt Transfer No.3

7007010 Synthetic Gypsum Silo Feed Belt Transfer No.1

7107010 Synthetic Gypsum Silo Feed Belt Transfer No.2

4008000 Synthetic Gypsum Hopper/Feed Belt Transfer No.3

7006000 Outside Clinker No.1/Belt Transfer

7106000 Outsi de Clinker No.2/Belt Transfer

7006010

7106010 Clinker Reclaim Bin

7014000 Finish Mill No.1

TABLE 6.20 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE EMISSIONS (UNIT ID 04 FINISH MILL SYSTEM EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID Source Description

7041000 N o.1 Mill Cement FK Pump

7029000 No.1 Mill Separator

7037000 No.1 Mill Cement After Cooler

7021000 No.1 Mill Material Transfer

7019000 Finish Mill No.1 Bucket Elevator

7114000 Finish Mill No.2

7141000 No.2 Mill Cement FK Pump

7137000 No.2 Mill Cemen t After Cooler

7123000 No.2 High Efficiency Separator

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 81 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 6.20 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE EMISSIONS (UNIT ID 04 FINISH MILL SYSTEM EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID Source Description

7118000 No.2 Material Transfer

7119000 Finish Mill No.2 Bucket Elevator

4014000 Finish Mill No.3

4036000 No.3 Mill Cement FK Pump

4050000 No.3 Material Transfer

4052000 No.3 High Efficiency Separ ator

4020000 2 Finish Mill No.3 Bucket Elevators

TABLE 6.21 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE EMISSIONS (UNIT ID 05 CEMENT LOADOUT EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID Source Description

8103000 Marl Silo No.3

2126000 Marl Fringe Bin

8112000 Marl Silo No.12

8109000 Marl Silo No.4

8011000 Cement Loadout No.3

8017000 Cement Silos Nos. 1

- 11

8001000 Cement Silo No.13

TABLE 6.22 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE EMISSIONS (UNIT ID 05 CEMENT LOADOUT EQUIPMENT)

Equip ID Source Description

4036040

7141030 Pneumatic Transfer Piping to Cement Silos

8011010 Cement Silo Aeration Units

8214000 Bagged Cement Cleaning Station

8125000 Cement Packhouse Airslide

8131000 Mixer

8135000 Mixer Discharge Hopper

8142010 Packer Screw Conveyor

8137000 Packer Elevator

8138000 2 Vibrating Screens

8139000 Packer Hopper

8141000 Haver Packer

8142020 Waste Screw Conveyor

8011000 North Scale Cement Loading System

8011040 Airslide System to North Scale Loading Spout

8011060 No rth Scale Loading Spout (Truck)

8017000 Center Scale Loading System

8017040 Airslide System to Center Scale Loading Spout

8017090 Center Scale Loading Spout (Truck

- Rail)

8023000 South Scale Cement Loading System

8023040 Airslide System to South Scale Loading Spout

8023090 South Scale Loading Spout (Truck

- Rail)

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 82 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

TABLE 6.23 SOURCES REQUIRING A POLLUTANT PERFORMANCE TEST FOR VISIBLE EMISSIONS (UNIT ID 06 MISCELLANEOUS SOURCES) Equip

ID Source Description

6175000 Storage A Frame

MONITORING AND REP ORTING CONDITIONS (PERIODIC VISIBLE EMISSIONS MONITORING OF SOURCES SUBJECT TO 40CFR63.1348 )

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.7(a) Visible Emissions Monitoring of the Sources Subject to 40CFR63.1348 After Initial Visible Emissions Test

has been Completed (40CFR63.1350(a)(4)) After the initial visible emissions test required by condition 6.B.6(cc) is complete, the owner/operator shall monitor the new sources and the sources listed in Tables 6.16 through 6.26 for visible emissions by conducting while the aff ected sources are in operation, a monthly one(1)

- minute visible emissions test in accordance with 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 22 and follow the procedure specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4) of this condition. This monitoring shall

include the St orage A Frame if it is being used to store clinker. If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner/operator shall conduct a six(6)

- minute test of opacity in accordance with 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. The Method 9 test shall begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. The requirement to conduct Method 22 visible emissions monitoring does not apply to any totally enclosed conveying system transfer point, regardless of the location of the transfer point. At totally enclosed conveying system transfer point is defined as a conveying system transfer point that is enclosed on all sides, top, and bottom. All Method 22 and Method 9 visible observations shall be documented and recorded in a log. This log shall include the date and time of each Method 22 test, if applicable the date and time of the Method 9 test, whether any Method 22 emissions were observed and if applicable the Method 9 opacity of the visible emissions. If Method 22 visible emissions are observed then

the time the corrective actions specified in the operations and maintenance plan were initiated shall also be recorded in the log. This log shall be kept on

- site and all entries kept for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date of log entry.

(a)(1) If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner/operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semiannually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semian nual test, then testing of that affected source shall resume on a monthly basis and that schedule maintained until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(a)(2) If no visible emissions are observed during the semiannual test f or any affected source, the owner/operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi

- annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, then testing of that affected source shall

resume on a month ly basis and that schedule maintained until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(a)(3) If any partially enclosed or unenclosed conveying system transfer point is located in a building, the owner/operator has the option to c onduct a Method 22 test according to the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) and (a )(2) of this condition for each such conveying system transfer point located within the building, or for the building itself.

(a)(4) If visible emissions from a building are monitored, the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this condition apply to the monitoring of the building. In addition to the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) , the owner/operator shall also test visible emissions from each side, r oof and vent of the building for at least 1 minute. The test must be conducted under normal operating conditions.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 83 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (PERIODIC VISIBLE EMISSIONS MONITORING OF SOURCES SUBJECT TO 40CFR63.1348 )

Condition

Number Conditi on

6.B.7(b) Visible Emissions Monitoring of a Finish Mill’s Sweep and Air Separator PMCD After the Initial Visible

Emissions Test has been Completed (40CFR63.1350(e)) After the initial visible emissions test required by condition 6.B.6(cc) is comple te, the owner/operator for each Finish Mill shall monitor opacity by conducting daily visual emissions observations of the mill sweep and air separator PMCD in accordance with the procedures of 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 22. The Method 22 monitoring shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at normal operating conditions. The duration of the Method 22 test shall be 6 minutes. If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner/operator shall initiate, within one(1)

- hour, t he corrective actions specified in the site specific Operations and Maintenance Plan. Within 24 hours of the end of the Method 22 test in which visible emissions were observed, the owner/operator shall conduct a followup Method 22 test of each stack from w hich visible emissions were observed during the previous Method 22 test. If visible emissions are observed during the followup Method 22 test from any stack from which visible emissions were observed during the previous Method 22 test, the owner/operator shall conduct a visual opacity test of each stack from which emissions were observed during the follow up Method 22 test in accordance with 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. The duration of

the Method 9 test shall be 30 minutes. All Method 22 and Method 9 visib le observations shall be documented and recorded in a log. This log shall include the date and time of each Method 22 test, if applicable the date and time of the Method 9 test, whether any Method 22 emissions were observed and if applicable the Method 9 o pacity of the visible emissions. If Method 22 visible emissions are observed then the time the corrective actions specified in the operations and maintenance plan were initiated shall also be recorded in the log. This log shall be kept on

- site and all ent ries kept for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date of log entry.

MONITORING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS (WRITTEN OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN )

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.8(a) 40CFR63 Subpart LLL Written Operations and Maintenance Plan

(40CFR63.1350(a) and 40CFR63.1350(b)) When a source becomes subject to the applicable provisions of 40CFR63 Subpart LLL, the owner/operator shall prepare for that source a written operations and maintenance plan. Each source’s plan shall be submitted to the Department for review and approval no later than 180 days after the source becomes subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL unless the source already has a Department approved plan. Each plan shall include the applicable information listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4) of this condition. Failure to comply with any provision of the operations and maintenance plan shall be a violation of the standard.

(a)(1) Procedures to be used during an inspection of the components of the combustion system of the Rotary Kiln at least once per year as specified by condition 6.B12(h).

(a)(2) The corrective actions to be taken when required by conditions 6.B.9(a) and 6.B.9(b).

(a)(3) Procedures for proper operation and maintenance of the affected source and air pollution control devices in order to meet the emission limits and operating limits of 40CFR63.1343 through

40CFR63.1348.

(a)(4) Procedures to be used to periodically monitor affected sources subject to opacity standards under

40CFR63.1346 and 4 0CFR63.1348. Such procedures shall include the provisions of condition 6.B.9(a).

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 84 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 01 QUARRY/RAW MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.9(a) Conveying Saturated and Unsaturated Materials Using the 2 Mobile Marl Conveyors

(40CFR60.672(b), 40CFR60.672(h) and 40CFR60.676(g)) If the owner/operator subsequently conveys unsaturated materials on one or all of the Marl Conveyors which normally convey saturated materials it shall submit a report of this cha nge within 30 days following such change to the Department. The effected mobile conveyor is then subject to the 10% opacity limit specified in 40CFR60.672(b) and the emission test requirements of 40CFR60.11. Likewise, if owner/operator conveys saturated ma terials on one or both of the 2 Mobile Marl Conveyors that normally conveys unsaturated material, it shall submit a report of this change within 30 days following such change to the Department and EPA Region 4. The affected mobile conveyor is then subject to the no visible emission limit specified in 40CFR60.672(h).

6.B.9(b) Quarry Equipment Inspections of Quarry Equipment Processing Unsaturated Materials

(40CFR70.6(a)) If a quarry conveyor belt or quarry crusher processes unsaturated materials then the owner/operator shall conduct weekly equipment inspections and perform maintenance as necessary. All inspections shall be documented if any problems are found. This documentation shall include the date and time of inspection, the equipment type and its iden tification, clearly identify any problems(s) and list the corrective action(s) taken. All documented inspections shall be kept on

- site and on

- file for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date of inspection and made available to Department personnel upon request.

6.B.9(c) Quarry Equipment Like for Like Replacements

(40CFR60.670(d) and 40CFR60.676(a)) If the owner/operator replaces a piece of quarry equipment that is subject to the provisions of 40CFR60 Subpart OOO with a piece of equipment of equ al or lesser size than the original piece, the replacement piece is exempt from the initial source test requirements as outlined in

40CFR60.672. owner/operator shall also submit to the Department, the information contained in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c) (4) of this condition. The replacement piece of equipment is still subject to the opacity or no visible emission standards as applicable. If the entire production line is replacement then source testing must be conducted as specified in 40CFR60.672.

(c)(1 ) For a crusher, grinding mill, bucket elevator, bagging operation, or enclosed truck or railcar loading station the rated capacity in tons per hour of the existing facility being replacement and the rated capacity in tons per hour of the replacement equip ment.

(c)(2) For a screening operation the total surface area of the top screen of the existing screening operation being replacement and the total surface area of the top screen of the replacement screening operation.

(c)(3) For a conveyor belt the widt h of the existing belt being replacement and the width of the replacement conveyor belt.

(c)(4) For a storage bin the rated capacity in tons of the existing storage bin being replacement and the rated capacity in tons of replacement storage bins.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 85 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 01 QUARRY/RAW MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.9(d) Visible Emission Monitoring of Quarry Equipment Processing Unsaturated Materials

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(3)(i)(B)) If a quarry con veyor belt or quarry crusher processes unsaturated

materials then the owner/operator shall monitor for visible emissions by conducting while the affected source(s) are in operation a weekly visible emissions test in accordance with 40CFR60 Appendix A Metho d 9, 40CFR60.675(c) and 40CFR60.11(b). All visible observations shall be documented and dated in a log. This log shall include the observation date, equipment identification, whether any visible emissions were observed and their opacity. This log shall be kept on

- site and all log entries kept for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date of log entry. If visible emissions exceed the opacity limits specified in conditions 5.E.1(a) through 5.E.1(f) then the owner/operator shall locate and correct the p roblem(s) causing the exceedance immediately. The source of any excess visible emissions and the actions taken to eliminate them shall also be recorded in the log.

6.B.9(e) Physical or Operational Change in Quarry Operations

(40CFR60.7(a)(4)) The owner/o perator shall submit a notification of any physical or operational change in quarry operations to the Department which may increase the emission rate of any air pollutant to which a standard applies, unless that change is specifically exempted under an app licable subpart or in 40CFR60.14(e). This notice shall be postmarked within 60 calendar days or as soon as practicable before the change is commenced and include information describing the precise nature of the change, present and proposed emission control systems, productive capacity of the facility before and after the change, and the expected completion date of the change. The Department may request additional relevant information subsequent to this notice.

MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 02 KILN SY STEM EQUIPMENT) (ROTARY KILN)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.10(a) Continuous Monitoring of Rotary Kiln Dioxin/Furan Emissions

(40CFR63.1350(f)) The owner/operator shall calibrate, maintain and operate a temperature monitoring system to continuously moni tor Dioxin/Furan emissions by continuously recording the temperature of the Rotary Kiln exhaust gases. The recorder response range shall include zero(0) and 1.5 times either of the average temperatures established according to the requirements of condition 6.B.6(w). The reference method shall be a National Institute of Standards and Technology calibrated reference thermocouple

- potentiometer system or alternate reference, subject to approval by the Department. The three(3)

- hour rolling average temperature sh all be calculated as the average of 180 successive one(1)

- minute average temperatures. Periods of time when one(1)

- minute averages are not available shall be ignored when calculating three(3)

- hour rolling averages. When one(1)

- minute averages become

availa ble, the first one(1)

- minute average shall be added to the previous 179 values to calculate the three(3)

- hour rolling average. When the operating status of the raw mill of the in

- line kiln/ raw mill is changed from off to on, or from on to off the calculat ion of the three

- hour rolling average temperature shall begin anew, without considering previous recordings. The calibration of all thermocouples and other temperature sensors shall be verified at least once every three(3) months.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 86 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 02 KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT) (ROTARY KILN)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.10(b) Continuous Monitoring of Rotary Kiln Visible Emissions

(40CFR63.8(c)(4)(i) and 40CFR63.1350(c)) The owner/operator shall calibrate, maintain and operate in

ac cordance with 40CFR63 Subpart A and 40CFR60 Appendix B Performance Specification 1 a COMS to measure the opacity of the visible emissions discharged into the atmosphere from the Rotary Kiln. This COMS shall complete a minimum of one cycle of sampling and a nalyzing for each successive 10

- second period and one cycle of data recording for each successive 6

- minute period. For this COMS, the owner/operator shall also maintain a log of the span and zero from each calibration of the monitor. This log shall be kept on

- site and each log entry kept for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date of entry and made available to Department personnel upon request.

6.B.10(c) Continuous Monitoring of Rotary Kiln Particulate Matter Emissions

(40CFR63.1350(k)) The owne r/operator shall install, calibrate, maintain and operate a CPMS to measure the particulate matter discharged to the atmosphere from the Rotary Kiln. However, compliance with the requirements to install, calibrate, maintain and operate the monitor is not r equired until such time that the EPA promulgates all applicable performance specifications and operational requirements.

6.B.10(d) Records of Rotary Kiln Clinker Production and Feed Rates

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 7 and SC Regulation 61

- 62.99 Subpa rt B Section 99.44(c)(4)) The owner/operator shall keep records of the clinker production and kiln feed rates. The clinker production and kiln feed rates shall be recorded daily. For the purpose of remaining a synthetic minor plant under the

Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program specified by SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 7, the owner/operator is limited to a maximum clinker production rate for the Rotary Kiln of 1,095,000 tons/year (12 month rolling sum). The owner/operator shall not excee d 20% of this production limit with the vertical spindle mill in the off mode and shall accomplish at least 80% of this production limit with the vertical spindle mill in the on mode. The owner/operator shall record the monthly Rotary Kiln clinker producti on for both the vertical spindle mill on and off modes. These records shall be maintained on

- site and on

- file for a calendar period of five(5) years from the initial recording date and made available to Department personnel upon request.

6.B.10(e) Hot Ga s Generator and Rotary Kiln Permitted Fuels

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 2 and SC Regulation 62.5 Standard 8) The owner/operator is permitted to burn diesel fuel, coal, synthetic coal, shredded used tires, whole used tires, natural gas, on

- site generate d specification used oil, on

- site generated materials (i.e. absorbent pads and wipes) and No.6 Virgin Fuel Oil or any fuel approved by the Department. Non

- regulated wastes (Non

- Hazardous Waste as specified by 40CFR 262.11) are also permitted for use as Ro tary Kiln and Hot Gas Generator fuels if no additional equipment is required for their handling and the Sulfur and Nitrogen content of the waste is not higher than that of the coal used by the facility. If a non

- regulated waste requires additional handling equipment, then

the owner/operator shall obtain Department approval prior to using that waste as a fuel. The use of any other substances as fuel is prohibited without prior written approval from the Department. The on

- site generated

used oil shall be anal yzed for the constituents and parameters as specified by 40CFR279.11. If the on

- site generated used oil does not meet the allowable levels for the constituents and parameters in 40CFR279.11,

then the owner/operator shall gain approval from the Department b efore it can be used as a fuel. Records shall be kept on

- site and on

- file that show each non

- regulated waste or waste stream used as a fuel is not a hazardous waste as defined by SC Regulation 61.79

- 262.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 87 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 02 KILN SY STEM EQUIPMENT) (ROTARY KILN)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.10(f) Sulfur Content of Rotary Kiln Fuels

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 7 Avoidance) The maximum percent sulfur content of the fuel(s) burned in the Rotary Kiln shall be established by utiliz ing the weighted percent sulfur contained in the fuel(s) during the most recent Pollutant Performance Test for compliance with the SO 2 limits contained in this permit. Once the weighted percent is established, the owner/operator shall record daily the fuel s burned in the Rotary Kiln and maintain records that indicate the weighted percent sulfur in these fuels do not exceed the maximum percent established during the Pollutant Performance Test. The weighted percent sulfur

content of the fuel shall be based on the actual sulfur content of the individual fuels and the amount of the individual fuels burned in the kiln system. Compliance with the weighted sulfur content shall be determined

on a 12

- month rolling sum basis. These records shall be maintained on

- site and on

- file for a calendar period of five(5) calendar years and made available to Department personnel upon request.

6.B.10(g) Maximum Percent Kiln Gas Volume for Vertical Spindle Mill Modes

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.5 Standard 7 Avoidance) The volume of the flue gas exiting the PCM at standard conditions shall not exceed 5.0% of the flue gas volume exiting the kiln system. with the vertical spindle

mill in the on or off mode. The owner/operator shall record the percentage of kiln gas volume exiting this

stac k for each change in the vertical spindle mill mode. These records shall be maintained on

- site and on

file for a calendar period of five(5) calendar years and made available to Department personnel upon

request.

6.B.10(h) Rotary Kiln Combustion System I nspections

(40CFR63.1350(i)) Unless this requirement has been removed by the EPA, then the owner/operator shall conduct an inspection of the components of the Rotary Kiln combustion system at least once per year. The initial combustion system inspection sh all take place within one(1) calendar year of June 14, 2002. After the date of inspection, subsequent inspections shall be conducted within one(1) calendar year of the previous inspection date. All inspections shall be documented and include the date and t ime of inspection, clearly identify any problems and list the corrective action(s) taken. Each documented inspection shall be

maintained on

- site and on

- file for a calendar period of five(5) years from the date of inspection and made available to Department personnel upon request. If this requirement has been removed by the EPA, Rotary Kiln combustion system inspections are no longer required but records of any previous inspections shall be kept on

- site and on

- file as required by this condition.

6.B.10(i) Visible Emission Monitoring of Uncontrolled Coal Processing Equipment

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(a)(3)(i)(B)) The owner/operator shall monitor for visible emissions from the Coal Crusher Tower, Coal Grizzley, Radial Stacker Belt, Coal Reclaim Hoppers, Recla im Belt to Coal Day Tank, South Coal Day Tank, Pre

- Cal Coal Day Tank, Coal Cyclone Dust Collector, Coal Day Tank Screw Conveyor, Pre

- Cal Coal Day Tank Belt Conveyor, 672 Kiln Coal Mill Feed Conveyor, 672 Kiln Coal Mill, Rail Road Coal Unloading Hopper, 925 ’ Coal Inclined Belt Conveyor and Coal Transfer from C32 Belt by conducting while the affected source(s) are in operation a weekly visible emissions test in accordance with 40CFR60 Appendix A Method 9. All visible observations shall be documented and dated in a log. This log shall include the observation date, equipment identification, whether any visible emissions were observed and their opacity. This log shall be kept on

- site and all log entries kept for a calendar period of five(5) years

from the date of log entry. If visible emissions exceed the applicable opacity limits for this equipment then

the owner/operator shall locate and correct the problem(s) causing the exceedance immediately. The source of any excess visible emissions and the actions taken to eliminate them shall also be recorded in the log.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 88 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 02 KILN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT) (ROTARY KILN)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.10(j) Maximum Rotary Kiln PMCD Inlet Gas Temperature Limit

(40CFR63.1344(a) and 40CFR63.134 4(b)) Since the Rotary Kiln is subject to a Dioxin/Furan emission limitation as specified in condition 5.E.2(o), the owner/operator shall operate the Rotary Kiln such that the temperature of the gas at the inlet to the Rotary Kiln PMCD does not exceed the applicable temperature limit

when the raw mill of the in

- line kiln/raw mill is operating and not operating. The temperature limit shall be determined during the Pollutant Performance Test required by condition 6.B.6(w). Monitoring of the temperature shall be as required by condition 6.B.10(a).

6.B.10(k) Total NO

x Emissions Recordkeeping and Reporting

(SC Regulation 61

- 62.99 Subpart B Section 99.44(a)(2) and SC Regulation 61

- 62.99 Subpart B Section 99.44(c)(1)) T he owner/operator shall maintain daily reco rds of NO

x emissions in lb NO

x /ton of clinker for the control periods as defined in this condition. It shall also submit a report to the Department by October 31 of each year documenting the total NO

x emissions. For the control period that starts on May 3 1, 2004, the report shall document the total emissions from May 31 through September 30. For all subsequent control periods, the report shall document the total NO X emissions from May 1 through September 30. These records

shall be maintained on

- site and on

- file for a calendar period of five(5) calendar years and made available to Department personnel upon request.

MONITORING AND REPORTING (UNIT ID 03 CLINKER HANDLING EQUIPMENT) (CLINKER COOLER)

Condition

Number Condition

6.B.11(a) Continuous Monitoring of Clinker Cooler Visible Emissions

(40CFR63.8(c)(4)(i), 40CFR63.1350(d)(1) and 40CFR63.1350(d)(3)) The owner/operator shall monitor opacity at each point where emissions are vented from the clinker cooler. It shall install, calibrate, maintain,

and conti nuously operate a continuous opacity monitor located at the outlet of the clinker cooler PMCD to continuously monitor the opacity. The COMS shall be installed, maintained, calibrated, and operated as required by 40CFR63 Subpart A and 40CFR60 Appendix B Per formance Specification 1. To remain in compliance, the opacity shall be maintained such that the six(6)

- minute average opacity for any six(6)

- minute block period does not exceed 10%. If the average opacity for any six(6)

- minute block period exceeds 10% it constitutes a violation of the standard. This COMS shall complete a minimum of one cycle of sampling and analyzing for each successive 10

- second period and one cycle of data recording for each successive 6

- minute period.



### PART 7.0 ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS

A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

Condition

Number Condition

7.A.1 Applicability of Regulations

The owner/operator is subject to all applicable provisions of 40CFR60 Subpart A, 40CFR60 Subpart Y, 40CFR60 Subpart OOO, 40CFR63 Subpart A and 40C FR63 Subpart LLL. It is also subject to all applicable provisions of the SC State Air Pollution Control Standards.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 89 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

Condition

Number Condition

7.A.2 Conduct of Non

- Enclosed Operations

(SC Standard 4 Section X) All non

- enclosed operations shall be conducted in such a manner that a

m inimum of particulate matter becomes airborne. In no case shall established ambient air quality standards be exceeded at or beyond the property line. The owner/operator shall maintain dust control of the premises and any roadway it owns or controls by pavi ng, or other suitable measures. Oil treatment is prohibited. All crushing, drying, classification and like operations shall employ a suitable control device acceptable to the Department, and shall discharge no more particulate matter than that specified in this permit.

7.A.3 Prohibited Activities

(40CFR63.4(a)(1)) The owner/operator shall not operate any affected source subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL in violation of the applicable requirements of that subpart. Affected sources subject to and in complia nce with either an Extension of Compliance or an exemption from compliance are not in violation of the applicable requirements. An Extension of Compliance can be granted by the EPA, Department or by

the President of the United States under Clean Air Act Se ction 112(i)(4).

7.A.4 Circumvention

(40CFR60.12 and 40CFR63.4(b)) The owner/operator shall not build, erect, install, or use any article, machine, equipment, or process to conceal an emission that would otherwise constitute noncompliance with

a relevan t standard. Such concealment includes, but is not limited to the use of diluents to achieve compliance with a relevant standard based on the concentration of a pollutant in the effluent discharged to the atmosphere and the use of gaseous diluents to achiev e compliance with a relevant standard for visible

emissions.



### B. OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(e)(5)]

No proposed reasonably anticipated operating scenarios identified in the permittee’s Part 70 Application.

C. COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE [ SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.5(c)(8)]

Not applicable at this time.

### Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 90 of 90

(Permit updated12/8/05 and 11/8/06)



### D. PERMIT SHIELD [SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.6(f)]

A copy of the “applicability determination” Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) submitted with it’s Part 70 permit ap plication is included as Attachment C. Compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit shall be deemed compliance with any applicable requirements as of the date of permit issuance. The permittee shall also be shielded from any

non

- applicable req uirements as agreed upon by the Department as specified in Attachment C.

SC Regulation 61

- 62.5, Standard No. 7

Nothing in the permit shield or in any Part 70 permit shall alter or affect the provisions of Section 303 of the Act, Emergency Orders, of the Clean Air Act; the liability of the permittee for any violation of applicable requirements prior to or at the time of permit issuance; the applicable requirements of the Acid Rain Program, consistent with Section 408(a) of the Clean Air Act; or the abilit y of EPA to obtain information from a source pursuant to Section 114 of the Clean Air Act. In addition, the permit shield shall not apply to emission units in noncompliance at the time of permit issuance, minor permit modifications (SC Regulation

61

- 62.7 0.7(e)(2)), group processing of minor permit modifications (SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(e)(3)), or operational flexibility (SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(e)(5)), except as specified in SC Regulation 61

- 62.70.7(e)(5)(iii).

### ATTACHMENT A

Modeled Emission Rates January 21, 1998

Laf arge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 1 of 2

MODELING DESCRIPTION: As built modeling . Inorganic toxics modeled by doubling the PM 10 

### emission rate to get a TSP rate and then using an analysis of the components to calculate a maximum emission rate for that toxic (based on it’s percentage content in TSP). Tables 1 through 3 list the result s. No emission rates were listed in the modeling summary.

TABLE 1. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (STANDARD NO. 2)

Pollutant Averaging

Time Model

Used Maximum Modeled

Concentration (  g/m 3 ) Background

Concentration (μg/m 3 ) Total

(μg/m 3 ) Standard

(μg/m 3 )

S O 2 3 HOUR ISCST3 224 34 258 1300

24 HOUR ISCST3 77 17 94 365

ANNUAL ISCST3 8 3 11 80

TSP ANNUAL ISCST3 27 27 54 75

PM 10 24 HOUR ISCST3 78 29 107 150

ANNUAL ISCST3 13 21 34 50

CO 1 HOUR ISCST3 1497 14882 16379 40000

8 HOUR ISCST3 435 6067 6502 10 000

GASEOUS

FLUORIDES 12 HOUR ISCST3 0.069 N/A 0.07 3.7

24 HOUR ISCST3 0.060 N/A 0.06 2.9

1 WEEK ISCST3 N/A N/A 0 1.6

1 MONTH ISCST3 0.013 N/A 0.01 0.8

NO 2 ANNUAL ISCST3 14 8 22 100

LEAD QUARTERLY ISCST3 0.012 0.03 0.04 1.5

### ATTACHMENT A

Modeled Emission Rates January 21, 1998

Laf arge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 2 of 2

TABLE 2. CLASS II PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION (STANDARD NO. 7)

Pollutant Averaging Time Model Used Maximum Modeled

Concentration (μg/m 3 ) Standard (μg/m 3 )

PM 10 24 HOUR ISCST3 19 30

ANNUAL ISCST3 3 17

SO 2 3 HOUR ISCST3 224 512

24 HOUR ISCST3 56 91

ANNUA L ISCST3 8 20

TABLE 3. TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS MODELED (STANDARD NO. 8)

Pollutant CAS Number Averaging Time Model Used Maximum Modeled Concentration (μg/m 3 ) Standard (μg/m 3 )

Antimony Compounds N/A 24 HOURS ISCST3 0.00520 2.50

Arsenic 7440382 24 HOURS ISC ST3 0.0906 1.00

Benzene 71432 24 HOURS ISCST3 0.0596 150.00

Beryllium 7440417 24 HOURS ISCST3 0.00690 0.01

Cadmium 7440439 24 HOURS ISCST3 0.0206 0.25

Chromium (+6) Compounds N/A 24 HOURS ISCST3 0.183 2.50

Cobalt Compounds N/A 24 HOURS ISCST3 0.0185 0 .25

Ethyl Benzene 100414 24 HOURS ISCST3 0.0994 4350.00

Manganese Compounds N/A 24 HOURS ISCST3 0.827 25.00

Mercury 7439976 24 HOURS ISCST3 0.0231 0.25

Nickel 7440020 24 HOURS ISCST3 0.0305 0.50

Phosphorous 7723140 24 HOURS ISCST3 0.368 0.50

Selenium Compounds N/A 24 HOURS ISCST3 0.193 1.00

Xylene 1330207 24 HOURS ISCST3 0.398 4350.00

### ATTACHMENT B

Insignificant Activities Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 1 of 2

(Permit Updated (12/8/05)



### Tables 1 and 2 contain a list of equipment and activities which are considered insignificant pursuant to South Carolina Regulation 61

- 62.70.5(c). Sources listed belo w are not exempt from any otherwise applicable state or federal requirements including, but not limited to, opacity standards, ambient air quality standards, and air toxic standards.

TABLE 1. INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES

Equip

ID Source Description Design

Ca pacity Date

Listed Install

Date Basis

N/A No.6 Fuel Oil Storage Tank 1,125,000 gal 1999 2/15/73 Tank not subject to NSPS due to install date and insignificant emissions

N/A Large Grinding Aid Tank 10,000 gal 1999 2/15/73 Tank not subject to NSPS due to i nstall date and insignificant emissions

N/A Air Entrainment Tank 5,876 gal 1999 2/15/73 Tank not subject to NSPS due to install date and insignificant emissions

N/A 2 Diesel Fuel Storage Tanks 6,000 gal Each 1999 2/15/73 Tank Size

N/A Used Oil Tank 300 gal 1999 N/A Tank Size

N/A 4 Bulk Lubricating Oil

Auxiliary Storage Tanks 1,000 gal Each 1999 2/15/73 Tank Sizes

N/A 10 Truck Shop Used Oil

Wagon Auxiliary Storage

Tanks 55 gal Each 1999 N/A Tank Sizes

N/A Fueling Truck 1,000 gal 1999 N/A Truck Tan k Size

and Insignificant Emissions

N/A Lubricant and Solvent Drums 35 to 300 gal

Each 1999 N/A Drum Size

and Insignificant Emissions

N/A Portable Air Compressor 250 Hp 1999 N/A Insignificant Emissions

N/A Alternative Fuels

Unloading Dump Hopper

With Screw Conveyor 40 tons 1999 1999 Insignificant Emissions

N/A Air Entrainment Tank 5,876 gal 1999 2/15/73 Tank Size

and Insignificant Emissions

N/A Alternative Fuels

Covered Conveyor Belt (Unloads dump hopper into bucket elevator) 15 tph 1999 1999 Insign ificant Emissions

N/A Alternative Fuels

Bucket Elevator (Elevator from grade level to approximately 100 ft above grade level) 15 tph 1999 1999 Insignificant Emissions

### ATTACHMENT B

Insignificant Activities Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 2 of 2

(Permit Updated (12/8/05)

TABLE 2. INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES

Equip

ID Source Description Design Capacity Date

Listed Install

(Modify)

Date Exemption Basis

N/A Alternative Fuels

Covered Conveyor Belt (Conveyor belt to preheater tower) N/A 1999 1999 Insignificant Emissions

N/A Alternative Fuels

Intermediate bin with screw conveyor (Discharge to the precalcine r chute) 7 tph (600 ft 3 ) 1999 1999 (2005) Insignificant Emissions

N/A AF Covered Screw Conveyor for the Discharge

to the Precalciner Shoot and/or AF Air Driven Eductor for the Discharge to the Precalciner

Shoot 7 tph 2005 2005 Insignificant Emissions

N/A Portable Vacuum System N/A 1999 2001 Insignificant Emissions

N/A Diesel Fuel Auxiliary Storage Tank 20,000 gal 2004 1998 Tank not subject to NSPS

due to tank size

N/A Cummins Model DGFA

Diesel Generator 150 kW 2005 2005 Generator Size

### ATTACHMENT C

A pplicable and Non

- Applicable Federal and State Regulations Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 1 of 4

Tables 1 thro ugh 6 contain the Federal and South Carolina air pollution regulations, which were specified in the Part 70, permit application and determined as applicable and

non

- applicable by the Department as of the date of this permit issuance. This attachment may b e revised by the Department in the event of a change in the nature or emission of pollutants at the source or promulgation of new or revised regulations.

TABLE 1. STATE REGULATIONS

Regulation Applicable Not Applicable Reason

62.1 Section I (Definitions ) X Definitions

62.1 Section II (Permit Requirements) X Cement manufacturing equipment is source of air

contaminants.

62.1 Section III (Emissions Inventory) X Inventory already conducted for Title V permit

62.1 Section IV (Source Tests) X The Laf arge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) Rotary Kiln and Clinker Cooler are required to be

tested.

62.2 (Prohibition of Open Burning) X Open burning prohibited at the plant

62.3 (Air Pollution Episodes) X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) is required to comply.

62.4 (Hazardous Air Pollutant Conditions) X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) manufacturing equipment is a source of HAP’s and fugitive dust.

62.5 Standard 1 (Fuel Burning Operations) X The Lafarge Buildi ng Materials (Harleyville Plant) does not have any sources that meet the definition of fuel burning.

62.5 Standard 2 Ambient Air Quality Standards X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) manufacturing equipment emits criteria pollutants.

62 .5 Standard 3

Waste Combustion and Reduction X If anything other than virgin fuel is burned then this standard applies. The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) uses non

- regulated wastes as Rotary Kiln fuels which are other than virgin fuels.

62.5 Standard 4

Emissions from Process Industries X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) Rotary Kiln and Clinker Coolers are specified as subject to this regulation.

62.5 Standard 5 Volatile Organic Compounds X This standard specifies c ertain process industries. Cement plants are not specified so this is not applicable.

62.5 Standard 6 Alternative Emission Limitation Options X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) has not requested any alternative emission

limitations and so this is not applicable.

62.5 Standard 7 Prevention of Significant Deterioration X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) is subject but has taken emission limits to remove themselves from applicability.

62.5 Standard 8 (Toxic Air Pollutan ts) X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) manufacturing equipment emits toxic air pollutants.

### ATTACHMENT C

A pplicable and Non

- Applicable Federal and State Regulations Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 2 of 4

TABLE 2. STATE REGULATIONS

Regulation Applicable Not Applicable Reason

62.6 Section I Control of Fugitive Particulate Matter

in

Non

- Attainme nt Area X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) is located in an

attainment area.

62.6 Section II Control of Fugitive Particulate Matter

in

Problem Areas X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) is not located in a problem area.

62.6 Section III

Control

of Fugitive Particulate Matter Statewide X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) manufacturing equipment is a source of fugitive dust.

62.7 (Good Engineering Practice Stack Height) X The Lafarge Building Materi als (Harleyville Plant) Rotary Kilns emit through a stack.

62.63

National Emission Standards

for

Hazardous Air Pollutants X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) is a major HAP source.

62.68 (Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions) X T he Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) does not store any liquids subject to this regulation.

62.70 (Title V Operating Permit Program) X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) emissions are greater

than thresholds.

62.72 (Acid Rai n Program) X A cement plant is not a source type listed in the applicability section of this regulation.

TABLE 3. FEDERAL REGULATIONS (40CFR60 NEW SOURCE PEFORMANCE STANDARDS)

Subpart Applicable Not Applicable Reason

40CFR60 Subpart A (General Provi sions) X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) is subject to 40CFR60 Subpart Kb, 40CFR60 Subpart Y and 40CFR60 Subpart OOO.

40CFR60 Subpart F

Standards of Performance for Cement Plants X This subpart does not apply for sources complying wit h 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) is complying with 40CFR63 Subpart LLL.

40CFR60 Subpart Y Standards of Performance for Coal Preparation Plants X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) has coal prepara tion equipment subject to the provisions of this subpart.

### ATTACHMENT C

A pplicable and Non

- Applicable Federal and State Regulations Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 3 of 4

TABLE 4. FEDERAL REGULATIONS (40CFR60 NEW SOURCE PEFORMANCE STANDARDS)

Subpart Applicable Not Applicable Reason

40CFR60 Subpart OOO

Standards of Performance For Nonmetallic Mineral

Processi ng Plants X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) has quarry and marl handing equipment subject to this subpart.

Other New Source Performance Standards X All other New Source Performance Standards of 40CFR60 except 40CFR60 Subpart Y and 40C FR60 Subpart OOO do not apply because they apply to other types of sources. The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) is either not a type of source or does not operate equipment covered by those New

Source Performance Standards.

TABLE 5. FEDERA L REGULATIONS (40CFR61 NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS)

Subpart Applicable Not Applicable Reason

All NESHAPS X All NESHAPS do not apply because they apply to other source types. The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plan t) is either not a source type or does not operate a source type covered by those NESHAPS.

TABLE 6. FEDERAL REGULATIONS (40CFR63 NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES)

Subpart Applicable Not Applicable Reason

Subpart A (General Provisions) X The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) is subject to 40CFR63 Subpart LLL. 40CFR63 Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry X The La farge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) has equipment subject to this subpart.

Other National Emission Standards for Hazardous

Air Pollutants X All other subparts except 40CFR63 Subpart LLL do not apply because they apply to other

source types. The Lafarge Building Materials (Harleyville Plant) is either not a source type or does not operate a source type covered by those subparts.

### ATTACHMENT C

A pplicable and Non

- Applicable Federal and State Regulations Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

TV

- 0900

- 0004 Page 4 of 4

TABLE 7. FEDERAL REGULATIONS (OTHER REGULATIONS)

Subpart Applicable Not Applicable Reason

40CFR 64 (Compliance As surance Monitoring) X CAM has been incorporated into the requirements of 40CFR63 Subpart LLL

### PERMIT ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

acfm Actual Cubic Feet Per Minute

AMM Alternative Monitoring Method

As Arsenic

AST Auxiliary Storage Tank BAQ SC Departm ent of Heath and Environmental Control, Bureau of Air Quality

Be Beryllium

Btu British Thermal Unit

Cd Cadmium

CEMS Continuous Emission Monitoring System

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CMS Continuous Monitoring System

Co Cobalt

CO Carbon Monoxide

COM Cont inuous Opacity Monitor Config Configuration

CPMS Continuous Particulate Monitoring System

Cr Chromium

dscfm Dry Standard Cubic Feet Per Minute

EPA Environmental Protection Agency Equip Equipment

ft 3 Cubic Feet gal Gallon

HCl Hydrochloric Acid Hp Horsepower

hr Hour

H 2 O Water

ID Identification

lb pound

LBM Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

Max. Maximum

Mn Manganese

m 3 Cubic Meter

N/A Not Applicable

Ni Nickel

No. Number

NO

x Nitrous Oxides

NSPS New Source Performance Standards

OSHA Occupatio nal Safety And Health Administration

P Process Rate

PMCD Particulate Matter Control Device

PCM Precalciner Coal Mill

PM Particulate Matter

PM 10 Particulate Matter of size 10 microns or less

PM/hr Pounds of Particulate Matter per Hour

ppm Parts Per Million psig Gauge Pressure in Pounds Per Square Inch

PPT Pollutant Performance Test QA Quality Assurance QC Quality Control

Sb Antimony

SC South Carolina

Se SeleniumSOP Standard Operating Procedure

SO 2 Sulfur Dioxide

SSM Startup, Shutdown an d Malfunction

syn Synthetic tph Tons Per Hour
tpy Tons Per Year

TSP Total Suspended Particulate

TxDF Textile Derived Fuel

VE Visible Emission

VOC Volatile Organic Compound VSM Vertical Spindle Mill

% Percent

### December 8, 2005

Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

P.O. Box 326 Harleyville, SC 29448

ATTENTION: Gary Fields

Re: Revised Title V Operating Permit TV

- 0900

- 0004

Dear Mr. Fields:

Enclosed please find your revised Title V Permit TV

- 0900

- 0004 that in corporates the requirements of construction permit 0900

- 0004

- EC and adds a new generator to the insignificant activities list . This permit replaces your previously issued operating permit.

Please review this permit carefully. Should you notice any errors or omissions, notify your permit engineer, Kirk Schneider, of this office, at (803) 898

- 4023.

Sincerely,

Carl W. Richardson, P.E., Director Engineering Services Division Bureau of Air Quality

CWR:KGS:pe

Enclosure

cc: Mark Hiott, Region 7 Charlesto n EQC Office

Scott Miller , EPA Region IV (via e

- mail)

TV

- 0900

- 0004

### November 8, 2006

Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. (Harleyville Plant)

P.O. Box 326 Harleyville, SC 29448

ATTENTION: Gary Fields

Dear Mr. Fields:

Enclosed please find your upda ted Title V Operating Permit No. 0900

- 0004, which will replace your Title V Operating Permit, previously issued December 8, 2005. Attachment A, B and C has not been updated and will not be

re

- issued. 

### Pursuant to the South Carolina Administrative Procedure s Act, this permit decision may be appealed in accordance with applicable state law. Please see the enclosed Notice of Appeal Procedure, effective July 01, 2006, for guidelines on appeal submittals.

The updated Title V Operating Permit reflects the follo wing modifications:

1. Added condition 21 from the PSD construction permit 0900

- 0004

- EF, issued August 18, 2006. The new

non

- methane VOC BACT limits were incorporated.

2. Incorporated construction permit 0900

- 0004

- EE for a new Marl Silo 12.

3. Incorporated constru ction permit 0900

- 0004

- EG for an additional raw material fed system.

4. Incorporated construction permit 0900

- 0004

- EH for the upgrading of the Fredenhagen clinker conveyor.

5. Removed 40 CFR 63, Subpart LLL applicability for the storage A

- frame, as per a letter form BAQ to Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. dated February 15, 2006.

Please examine this updated permit carefully for errors or omissions and notify the appropriate staff member, Veronica Barringer, (803

- 898

- 4127) or e

- mail at barrinv@dhec.sc.gov promptl y if any are discovered.

Sincerely,

Rhonda B. Thompson, P.E., Director Engineering Services Division Bureau of Air Quality

RBT:EAVB:pe

Enclosure

cc: Mark Hiott, Region 7, Charleston EQC Office James Purvis, EPA Region IV (via e

- mail)

TV

- 0900

- 0004

### Notice of Appeal Procedure

The following procedures are in effect beginning July 1, 2006, pursuant to 2006 Act No. 387:

1. This decision of the S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control (Department) becomes the final agency decision 15 days after notice of the decision has been mailed to the applicant or respondent, unless a written request for final review is filed with the Department by the applicant, permittee, licensee, or affected person.

2. An applicant, permittee, licensee, or affected pers on who wishes to appeal this decision must file a written request for final review with the Clerk of the Board at the following address or by facsimile

at 803

- 898

- 3393.

Clerk of the Board

SC DHEC

2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201

3. The request for fin al review should include the following:

a. the grounds on which the Department’s decision is challenged and the specific changes sought in the decision

b. a statement of any significant issues or factors the Board should consider in deciding how

to handle the ma tter

c. a copy of the Department’s decision or action under review

4. In order to be timely, a request for final review must be received by the Clerk of the Board within 15 days after notice of the decision has been mailed to the applicant or respondent. If th e 15th day occurs on a weekend or State holiday, the request is due to be received by the Clerk of the Board on the next working day. The request for final review must be received by the Clerk of the Board by 5:00 p.m. on the date it is due.

5. If a timel y request for final review is filed with the Clerk of the Board, the Clerk will provide additional information regarding procedures.

6. The Board of Health and Environmental Control has 60 days from the date of receipt of a request

for final review to con duct a final review conference. The conference may be conducted by the Board, its designee, or a committee of three members of the Board appointed by the chair.

7. If a final review conference is not conducted within 60 days, the Department decision becom es the final agency decision, and a party may request a contested case hearing before the Administrative Law Court within 30 days after the deadline for the final review conference.

The above information is provided as a courtesy; parties are responsibl e for complying with all applicable legal requirements.