alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
uCongrea of the Eniteb 6tateg 

wouge of Repre5eutatibeg 

Wagfjington, )M,C 20515-3307 

WEB PAGE:


www.house.gov/mcintyre

October 18, 2013 

CO-CHAIRMAN 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES CAUCUS 

CO-CHAIRMAN 

CONGRESSIONAL WATERWAYS CAUCUS 

CO-CHAIRMAN 

CONGRESSIONAL CAUCUSES ON


THE UNITED KINGDOM AND SCOTLAND 

CO-CHAIRMAN 

U.S. AIR FORCE CAUCUS 

CO-CHAIRMAN 

TASK FORCE ON RESPONSIBLE 

FATHERHOOD


CO-CHAIRMAN 

CONGRESSIONAL CAUCUS ON 

YOUTH SPORTS


CO-CHAIRMAN 

CONGRESSIONAL PRAYER CAUCUS 

MIKE McINTYRE 

7TH DISTRICT, NORTH CAROLINA 

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES 

RANKING MEMBER


SUBCOMMITTEE ON


SEAPOWER AND PR0.IECTION FORCES 

SUBCOMMITTEE ON


TACTICAL AIR AND LAND FORCES 

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE 

SUBCOMMITTEE ON LIVESTOCK, 

RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND CREDIT 

SU9COMMITTEE ON CONSERVATION,


ENERGY AND FORESTRY 

U.S. HELSINKI COMMISSIONER 

ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY AND


COOPERATION IN EUROPE

The Honorable Gina McCarthy 

Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Dear Administrator McCarthy: 

I am writing to request that the EPA lower the 2014 volumes for Renewable Fuel 

Standard (RFS) to keep the total volumes of ethanol below the 10 percent 

threshold. 

As you know, the EPA is uniquely situated to provide temporary relief to the 

market through adjustment of the required RFS volume levels. With Americans 

using less gasoline, many refiners are struggling to meet the biofuels mandate 

without putting engines at risk. As such, I respectfully request that the EPA 

evaluate the availability of renewable fuels as well as the constraints on 

consumption, and consider lowering the federal mandate to align with gasoline 

market conditions and realities. 

Sincerely,

Mike McIntyre 

^ 

Member of Congress 

2428 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING	

119 COURTHOUSE DRIVE	

497 OLDE WATERFORDE WAY	

SMITHFIELD TOWN NALL 

WASHwcroN, DC 20515-3307	

P.O. Box 2107 SUiTF 206 350 MARKET STREET 

(202)225-2731

	

ELIZABETHTOWN, NC 28337

	

LELAND, NC 28451 P.O. Box 761 

FAx:(202)225-5773

	

(910)862-1487

	

(910)399-1134

	

SMITHFIELD, NC 27577 

FAx:(910)862-2286

	

FAx:19101399-4172 

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 506 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 506

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        August 4, 1994.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3474) to reduce 
administrative requirements for insured depository institutions to the extent 
consistent with safe and sound banking practices, to facilitate the 
establishment of community development financial institutions, and for other 
purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2021217EN.01003102.xml

| 7.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/31

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 9 April 2021 — Le Port de Bruxelles v Infrabel SA and Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v Infrabel SA

(Case C-229/21)

(2021/C 217/42)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Le Port de Bruxelles, Région de Bruxelles-Capitale

Respondent: Infrabel SA

Interested parties: Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, Le Port de Bruxelles, Lineas SA

Question referred

Where an inland port — which forms part of the core network — is already connected to the road and to the rail network, does Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU, (1) construed in isolation or in conjunction with other provisions of that regulation, lay down an obligation to keep and to maintain both those links or an obligation to refrain from removing one of them, even merely by failing to maintain it?

---

(1)  OJ 2013 L 348, p. 1.

---
<PAGE>

                                       EXHIBITS

    
EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                               Three months ended
                                                                    March 31, 
                                                           -------------------------
                                                               1998           1997
                                                           -----------   ------------
<S>                                                        <C>           <C>
Numerator:
   Numerator for basic and diluted income per share -
      net income                                           $ 1,157,504   $ 1,139,636 
                                                           -----------   ------------
Denominator:                                                                         
   Denominator for basic income per share - weighted                                 
      average common shares                                 12,682,012     12,885,000
                                                                                     
   Effect of dilutive securities:                                                    
      Stock options, net                                      326,682        433,973 
                                                           -----------   ------------
   Denominator for diluted income per share                13,008,694     13,318,973 
                                                           -----------   ------------
Basic income per share                                     $     0.09     $     0.09 
                                                           -----------   ------------
                                                           -----------   ------------
Diluted income per share                                   $     0.09     $     0.09 
                                                           -----------   ------------
                                                           -----------   ------------

</TABLE>
                                          13
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 543 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 543

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 29, 1994.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 4926) to require the Secretary of the Treasury to identify foreign 
countries which may be denying national treatment to United States banking 
organizations and to assess whether any such denial may be having a significant 
adverse effect on such organizations, and to require Federal banking agencies to 
take such assessments into account in considering applications by foreign banks 
under the International Banking Act of 1978 and the Bank Holding Company Act of 
1956. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to 
consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 
rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs now printed in the bill. Each section of the 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. 
At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 
rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 
adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment 
adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment 
in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2021349EN.01001901.xml

| 30.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 4 June 2021 — R.J. R. v Valstybės įmonė Registrų centras

(Case C-354/21)

(2021/C 349/24)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: R.J. R.

Respondent: Valstybės įmonė Registrų centras

Question referred

Must point (l) of Article 1(2) and Article 69(5) of Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession be interpreted as not precluding legal rules of the Member State in which the immovable property is situated under which the rights of ownership can be recorded in the Real Property Register on the basis of a European Certificate of Succession only in the case where all of the details necessary for registration are set out in that European Certificate of Succession?

---

(1)  OJ 2012 L 201, p. 107.

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, James T. Engen, certifythat:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of LOUD Technologies Inc.;

 

2.  Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)  Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of director:

 

(a)  All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: November  6, 2003 | By:    |   /s/  James T. Engen                     |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   |   James  T. Engen                         |
|                          |   |   *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

1

----
# C_2021382EN.01001601.xml

| 20.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I (Germany) lodged on 29 June 2021 — KT, NS v FTI Touristik GmbH

(Case C-396/21)

(2021/C 382/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht München I

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: KT, NS

Defendant: FTI Touristik GmbH

Question referred

Do restrictions imposed due to an infectious disease that is prevalent at the travel destination constitute a lack of conformity within the meaning of Article 14(1) of Directive (EU) 2015/2302 (1) even if, because of the worldwide spread of the infectious disease, such restrictions were imposed both in the traveller’s place of residence and in other countries?

---

(1)  Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements, amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC (OJ 2015 L 326, p. 1).

---
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-130579) and Form S-8 (No. 333-112093) of Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corporation of our report dated March 16, 2007, except as to the going concern uncertainty described in Note 27, which is as of
August 9, 2007, relating to the financial statements, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form
10-K/A.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|                              
|Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania      
|August 9, 2007
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by 
reference in this registration statement, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form
S-8 to Form S-4 Registration Statement (File No. 33-90350) of our report dated 
March 8, 1996, of the consolidated balance sheet of Quantum Financial Holdings, 
Inc. (a Maryland corporation) and subsidiary as of December 31, 1995 and the 
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity 
and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994.

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Baltimore, Maryland,
  May 8, 1997
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO SANCHEZ OCHOA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

ED W. CAMPBELL, Director of Yakima

County Department of Corrections;

SCOTT HIMES, Chief of the Yakima

County Department of Corrections;

YAKIMA COUNTY, 

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 17-35679

D.C. No. 1:17-cv-03124-SMJ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Salvador Mendoza, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 9, 2018

Seattle, Washington

Before: RAWLINSON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and FREUDENTHAL,**

Chief District Judge.

 

FILED

MAR 30 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Nancy Freudenthal, Chief United States District Judge

for the District of Wyoming, sitting by designation.
Defendants-Appellants Ed W. Campbell, Scott Himes, and Yakima County

(collectively, the County) appeal the district court’s order granting PlaintiffAppellee Antonio Sanchez Ochoa’s (Sanchez Ochoa) request for a temporary

restraining order (TRO). The TRO required that the County: remove a notation

from its online jail roster indicating that Sanchez Ochoa was being detained

pursuant to an immigration hold; physically release Sanchez Ochoa should he post

bond on his state charges; and refrain from relying on an administrative warrant to

hold or otherwise communicate to third parties that Sanchez Ochoa was being held

due to his immigration status. Reviewing subject matter jurisdiction de novo,

including questions of mootness, we dismiss the case as moot and vacate the TRO. 

See Diaz v. First Am. Home Buyers Prot. Corp., 732 F.3d 948, 951 (9th Cir. 2013)

(citation omitted). 

Following the district court’s entry of the TRO, Sanchez Ochoa posted bond

and left the Yakima County Jail. Outside the jail, federal immigration authorities

apprehended Sanchez Ochoa and took him into custody. 

At oral argument, plaintiff’s counsel represented to the Court that Sanchez

Ochoa has been deported, and the state criminal charges have been resolved. 

These factual circumstances have removed any actual or live controversy between

the parties, as enforcement of the TRO can no longer provide Sanchez Ochoa any

2
relief. Thus, this appeal has been rendered moot. See Bishop Paiute Tribe v. Inyo

Cty., 863 F.3d 1144, 1155 (9th Cir. 2017). 

APPEAL DISMISSED. INJUNCTION (TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER) VACATED.

3
#### Murray SIMON, Appellant, v. Honorable Marvin U. MOUNTS, Jr., as Judge of the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, Criminal Division, Appellee.

No. 44884.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 19, 1974.

Cause dismissed.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and BOYD, JJ., concur.

CARLTON, (Ret.) J., dissents.
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, James T. Engen,certify that:

1.  I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LOUD Technologies Inc.;

2.  Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

(a)  All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)  Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Dated: August 14, 2006 | By:    | /s/ James T. Engen                                 |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | James T. Engen                                     |
|                        |   | *Chairman, President and Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                     STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                      HIGHWOODS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

     In connection with the Annual Report of Highwoods Realty Limited
Partnership (the "Operating Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carman J. Liuzzo, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Highwoods Properties Inc., general partner of the Operating
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Operating Partnership.

  /s/ CARMAN J. LIUZZO
-----------------------------------
Carman J. Liuzzo
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 25, 2003