alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1


LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a list of all subsidiaries of Secured Digital Applications,
Inc. as of December 31, 2003.


Name of Subsidiary                 Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EyStar Media Inc.,                                                     Delaware
a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company

Animated Electronic Industries Sdn Bhd (AEI),                          Malaysia
a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company

Perwimas Telecommunications Sdn Bhd,                                   Malaysia
a 86.4% owned subsidiary of AEI

Asiaco Multi Corporation Sdn Bhd (AMC)                                 Malaysia
a wholly owned subsidiary of AEI

Temasya Wira Sdn Bhd                                                   Malaysia
a 60% owned subsidiary of AEI

Secured Shipping Sdn Bhd                                               Malaysia
a wholly owned subsidiary of AEI

Asiaco Material Handling (East Coast) Sdn Bhd                          Malaysia
a 80% owned subsidiary of AMC

Asiaco Logistic Sdn Bhd                                                Malaysia
a 67% owned subsidiary of AMC

Asiaco Services Sdn Bhd                                                Malaysia
a 60% owned subsidiary of AMC
# C_2022084EN.01003401.xml

| 21.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/34

---

Order of the President of the Court of 26 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats 's-Hertogenbosch — Netherlands) — E, F v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid

(Case C-456/21) (1)

(2022/C 84/46)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 391, 27.9.2021.

---
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 548

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that aviators who

meet the qualification standards of the Air Forces Escape and Evasion

Society should be granted recognition for meritorious service by the

Department of Defense.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 26, 1994

Mr. STEARNS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

aviators who meet the qualification standards of the Air

Forces Escape and Evasion Society should be granted

recognition for meritorious service by the Department

of Defense.

Whereas aviators from throughout the armed forces have

served the United States with great courage and distinction in every conflict during this century;

Whereas thousands of aviators, in the course of performing

their missions, have been shot down behind enemy lines;

Whereas many of the aviators have overcome long odds and

great hardships to return to their units and resume their

service to the United States;
2

•HRES 548 IH

Whereas the aviators faced the added responsibility of maintaining the secrecy of their escape and evasion methods

in order to protect the lives of those who assisted them

and future aviators;

Whereas the secrecy requirement prevented the aviators from

petitioning for recognition of their achievements for decades after the fact;

Whereas the Air Forces Escape and Evasion Society has

served as the representative for the aviators and established strict qualifications for membership in the organization; and

Whereas the Department of Defense has not provided any

specific recognition to aviators who escaped and evaded

capture behind enemy lines: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that aviators who meet the qualification

3 standards of the Air Forces Escape and Evasion Society

4 should be granted recognition for meritorious service by

5 the Department of Defense.

Æ
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0797

SAT Date: 8/16/2013

Print Date: 9/30/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: Analogs: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: No exposures needed

Ecotox:

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0797

FATE: 

log Koc = 2.46 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.92 (E)

log Fish BAF = 1.36 (E) 
POTW removal (%) = 19 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate - strong

PBT Potential: P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Not absorbed through the skin as the neat material; poor

absorption through the skin if in solution; moderate absorption from the lung and GI tract 

(pchem). No significant health concerns.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 0.46 oer *

fish _ chronic value 0.037

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR chemical class = 

; MW 

(P); ; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured 

concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

4

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category None

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2104

ROBERT M. WYNE; NICOLAS W. LEWIS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus MEDO INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA02-1812-RDB) Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 1, 2005 Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert M. Wyne, Nicolas W. Lewis, Appellants Pro Se. Sharon A. Israel, JENKENS & GILCHRIST, P.C., Houston, Texas, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert M. Wyne and Nicolas W. Lewis appeal the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of Medo Industries, Inc., and denying their motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the reasoning of the district court, seeWyne v. Medo Indus., Inc. , No. CA-02-1812-RDB (D. Md. Mar. 25, 2004), and find no abuse of the district court’s discretion in its denial of the motion for reconsideration. Collison v. International Chem. Workers Union , 34 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir. 1994). We grant Appellants’ motion to place Appellants’ materials under seal. We deny Appellants’ motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 427

To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a rollcall

vote on passage of any measure making appropriations or providing revenue.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1994

Mr. GOODLATTE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to

require a rollcall vote on passage of any measure making

appropriations or providing revenue.

1 Resolved, That rule XV of the Rules of the House

2 of Representatives is amended by inserting at the end

3 thereof the following new clause:

4 ‘‘7. The House shall not pass or adopt, as the case

5 may be, any bill or joint resolution, or conference report

6 thereon, making appropriations or providing revenue ex7 cept by a rollcall vote, and the yeas and nays shall be con8 sidered as ordered.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE GOLD
STANDARD, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                                2,376,958 <F1>
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            13,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      2,405,064
<PP&E>                                                   66,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        2,904,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    13,438
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                  1,269
<OTHER-SE>                                            2,889,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          2,904,391
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              0
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        154,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (91,201)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.08)
<FN>
<F1>
Includes certificates of deposit.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 200215 U.S.C. SECTION 7241

I, John H. Sottile, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Goldfield Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.    (paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986)

c.    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d.    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

 

----

 

a.    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 13, 2003

 

 

/s/  John H. SottileJohn H. Sottile Chairman of the Board of Directors,     President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Rocco Macri, certify that:

1     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of W.P. Stewart & Co.,
      Ltd.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and
      have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
      annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the company's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board
      of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: March 16, 2005

/s/ Rocco Macri
-------------------------------------------------
Rocco Macri
Deputy Managing Director--Chief Financial Officer
#### William J. TUGYA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-424.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 27, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.41
                                    AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                           LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT

        This Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement is entered into as of
August 25, 1997, by and between Silicon Valley Bank ("Bank") and AG Associates,
Inc. ("Borrower").

                                    RECITALS

        Borrower and Bank are parties to that certain Loan and Security
Agreement dated as of August 2, 1996, as amended, (the "Agreement"). Borrower
has asked Bank to amend certain provisions of the Agreement.
Bank has agreed to do so in accordance with the terms of this Amendment.

        NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

        1.     Sections 6.8 and 6.11 are amended to read as follows (and
Exhibit D is amended to reflect such changes to be in the form of Exhibit D
attached hereto):

               6.8 Quick Ratio. Borrower shall maintain, as of the last day of
each fiscal quarter, a ratio of Quick Assets to Current Liabilities of at least
1.25 to 1.00.

               6.11 Profitability. Borrower shall not suffer a loss in excess of
$550,000 for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 1997 or a loss in excess of
$100,000 for the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 1997. Borrower shall be
profitable for each fiscal quarter thereafter.

        2.     Unless otherwise defined, all capitalized terms in this Amendment
shall be as defined in the Agreement. Except as amended, the Agreement remains
in full force and effect.

        3.     Borrower represents and warrants that the Representations and
Warranties contained in the Agreement are true and correct as of the date of
this Amendment, and that no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing.

        4.     This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute
one instrument.

        5.     As a condition to the effectiveness of this Amendment, Borrower
shall reimburse Bank for the Bank Expenses incurred in connection with this
Amendment.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of
the first date above written.

                                  AG ASSOCIATES, INC.

                                  By
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                  Title
                                       -----------------------------------------

                                  SILICON VALLEY BANK

                                  By
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                  Title
                                       -----------------------------------------

                                       1
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Whitemark Homes, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:  May
      12,
      2006


By:
            /s/ *William
              D. Rigsby*William
              D. RigsbyChief
              Executive Officer


Date:  May
      12,
      2006




By:
            /s/ *Russ
              Christensen*Russ
              ChristensenActing
              Principal Financial Officer






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Whitemark Homes, Inc. and will be retained
      by Whitemark Homes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.