32074 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2018 / Notices 

1See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain 

Folding Gift Boxes from the People’s Republic of 

China, 67 FR 864 (January 8, 2002) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 83 

FR 4641 (February 1, 2018). 

3See Domestic Interested Parties’ letters, ‘‘Third 

Five-Year (Sunset) Review of Antidumping Duty 

Order on Folding Gift Boxes from the People’s 

Republic of China/The Domestic Industry’s Notice 

of Intent to Participate,’’ dated February 16, 2018, 

and ‘‘Third Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Folding Gift Boxes 

From the People’s Republic of China/Substantive 

Response to the Notice of Initiation,’’ dated March 

5, 2018. 

4See Certain Folding Gift Boxes From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Expedited Third Sunset Review and Continuation of 

the Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 26414 (June 7, 

2018), and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

5See Investigation No. 731–TA–921 (Third 

Review): Folding Gift Boxes From China: 83 FR 

30777 (June 29, 2018), and USITC Publication 4800 

(July 2018), Folding Gift Boxes From China: 

Investigation No. 731–TA–921 (Third Review). 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5139. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 8, 2002, we published the 

Order on certain folding gift boxes from 

China.1 On February 1, 2018, we 

published the notice of initiation of the 

third sunset review of the Order, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2

Because domestic interested parties 

submitted a complete and adequate 

response, but respondent interested 

parties did not participate in the sunset 

review, we conducted the sunset review 

on an expedited basis, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2).3 As a result 

of this expedited sunset review, we 

determined that revocation of the Order 

would likely lead to a continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and, therefore, 

notified the ITC of the magnitude of the 

margins of dumping likely to prevail 

should the order be revoked, pursuant 

to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c) of the 

Act.4 On June 29, 2018, the ITC 

published its determination, pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Act, that revocation 

of the Order would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time.5

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the Order 

are certain folding gift boxes. Folding 

gift boxes are a type of folding or knockdown carton manufactured from paper 

or paperboard. Folding gift boxes are 

produced from a variety of recycled and 

virgin paper or paperboard materials, 

including, but not limited to, claycoated paper or paperboard and kraft 

(bleached or unbleached) paper or 

paperboard. The scope of the Order 

excludes gift boxes manufactured from 

paper or paperboard of a thickness of 

more than 0.8 millimeters, corrugated 

paperboard, or paper mache. The scope 

also excludes those gift boxes for which 

no side of the box, when assembled, is 

at least nine inches in length. 

Folding gift boxes included in the 

scope are typically decorated with a 

holiday motif using various processes, 

including printing, embossing, 

debossing, and foil stamping, but may 

also be plain white or printed with a 

single color. The subject merchandise 

includes folding gift boxes, with or 

without handles, whether finished or 

unfinished, and whether in one-piece or 

multi-piece configuration. One-piece 

gift boxes are die-cut or otherwise 

formed so that the top, bottom, and 

sides form a single, contiguous unit. 

Two-piece gift boxes are those with a 

folded bottom and a folded top as 

separate pieces. Folding gift boxes are 

generally packaged in shrink-wrap, 

cellophane, or other packaging 

materials, in single or multi-box packs 

for sale to the retail customer. The scope 

excludes folding gift boxes that have a 

retailer’s name, logo, trademark or 

similar company information printed 

prominently on the box’s top exterior 

(such folding gift boxes are often known 

as ‘‘not-for-resale’’ gift boxes or ‘‘giveaway’’ gift boxes and may be provided 

by department and specialty stores at no 

charge to their retail customers). The 

scope of the Order also excludes folding 

gift boxes where both the outside of the 

box is a single color and the box is not 

packaged in shrink-wrap, cellophane, 

other resin-based packaging films, or 

paperboard. 

Imports of the subject merchandise 

are classified under Harmonized Tariff 

Schedules of the United States (HTSUS) 

subheadings 4819.20.0040 and 

4819.50.4060. These subheadings also 

cover products that are outside the 

scope of the Order. Furthermore, 

although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, our written description of the 

scope of the Order is dispositive. 

Continuation of the Order 

As a result of the determinations by 

Commerce and the ITC that revocation 

of the Order would likely lead to a 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and material injury to an industry in the 

United States, pursuant to section 

751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the 

continuation of the Order. U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection will continue to 

collect cash deposits at the rates in 

effect at the time of entry for all imports 

of subject merchandise. 

The effective date of the continuation 

of the Order will be the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of continuation. Pursuant to 

section 751(c)(2) of the Act, Commerce 

intends to initiate the next five-year 

review of this order not later than 30 

days prior to the fifth anniversary of the 

effective date of continuation notice. 

This five-year (sunset) review and this 

notice are in accordance with sections 

751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and 

published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). 

Dated: July 5, 2018. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the, Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14825 Filed 7–10–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–588–854] 

Certain Tin Mill Products From Japan: 

Continuation of Antidumping Duty 

Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of the 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) and the 

International Trade Commission (ITC) 

that revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on certain tin mill products 

(tin mill products) from Japan would 

likely lead to a continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States, Commerce is publishing a notice 

of continuation of the AD order. 

DATES: Applicable July 11, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Yasmin Bordas, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3813. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 28, 2000, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2018 / Notices 32075 

1See Certain Tin Mill Products from Japan: 

Notice of Antidumping Duty Order, 65 FR 52067 

(August 28, 2000). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 

82 FR 20314 (May 1, 2017). 

3See Certain Tin Mill Products from Japan: Final 

Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 41933 (September 

5, 2017) (Final Results). 

4See Tin- and Chromium-Coated Steel Sheet 

from Japan: Investigation No. 701–TA–860 (Third 

Review), USITC Publication 4795 (June 2018); see 

also Tin- and Chromium-Coated Steel Sheet from 

Japan; Determination, 83 FR 29568 (June 25, 2018). 

5A full description of the scope of the order is 

contained in the memorandum to Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the 

non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from 

James Maeder, Senior Director performing the 

duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 

Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Certain Tin Mill Products from Japan’’ 

(Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated August 

29, 2017. 

1See Cast Iron Soil Pipe Fittings from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative 

Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment 

of Final Determination With Final Antidumping 

Duty Determination, 82 FR 60178 (December 19, 

2017) (Preliminary Determination). 

AD order on tin mill products from 

Japan.1 On May 1, 2017, Commerce 

published the notice of initiation of the 

third sunset review of the AD order on 

tin mill products from Japan, pursuant 

to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act).2 Commerce 

conducted this sunset review on an 

expedited basis, pursuant to section 

751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) because it 

received a complete, timely, and 

adequate response from a domestic 

interested party but no substantive 

responses from respondent interested 

parties. As a result of the review, 

Commerce determined, pursuant to 

sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c) of the Act, 

that revocation of the AD order would 

likely lead to a continuation or 

recurrence of dumping.3 Commerce, 

therefore, notified the ITC of the 

magnitude of the dumping margins 

likely to prevail should the AD order be 

revoked. On June 25, 2018, the ITC 

published notice of its determination, 

pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of 

the Act, that revocation of the AD order 

on tin mill products from Japan would 

likely lead to a continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time.4

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the 

antidumping duty order are tin mill flatrolled products that are coated or plated 

with tin, chromium or chromium 

oxides. Flat-rolled steel products coated 

with tin are known as tin plate. Flatrolled steel products coated with 

chromium or chromium oxides are 

known as tin-free steel or electrolytic 

chromium-coated steel. The 

merchandise covered by the order is 

currently classified in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS), under HTSUS subheadings 

7210.11.0000, 7210.12.0000, 

7210.50.0000, 7212.10.0000, and 

7212.50.0000 if of non-alloy steel and 

under HTSUS subheadings 

7225.99.0090, and 7226.99.0180 if of 

alloy steel. 

The HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes. 

The written description of the scope of 

the order remains dispositive.5

Continuation of the Order 

As a result of the determinations by 

Commerce and the ITC that revocation 

of the AD order would likely lead to a 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and material injury to an industry in the 

United States, pursuant to section 

751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the 

continuation of the AD order on tin mill 

products from Japan. 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

will continue to collect AD cash 

deposits at the rates in effect at the time 

of entry for all imports of subject 

merchandise. The effective date of the 

continuation of the order will be the 

date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of continuation. 

Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, 

Commerce intends to initiate the next 

five-year sunset review of the order not 

later than 30 days prior to the fifth 

anniversary of the effective date of 

continuation. 

This five-year sunset review and this 

notice are in accordance with section 

751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and 

published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). 

Dated: July 3, 2018. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14826 Filed 7–10–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–063] 

Cast Iron Soil Pipe Fittings From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Affirmative Countervailing Duty 

Determination 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that 

countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

Cast Iron Soil Pipe Fittings (soil pipe 

fittings) from the People’s Republic of 

China (China). The period of 

investigation is January 1, 2016, through 

December 31, 2016. 

DATES: Applicable July 11, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dennis McClure or Jinny Ahn, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–5973 or (202) 482–0339, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The mandatory respondents in this 

investigation are Shanxi Xuanshi 

Industrial Group Co., Ltd. (Shanxi 

Xuanshi), Shijiazhuang Chengmei 

Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Shijiazhuang 

Chengmei), and Wor-Biz International 

Trading Co., Ltd. (Anhui) (Wor-Biz). On 

December 19, 2017, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

Preliminary Determination of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) investigation 

of cast iron soil pipes from China.1 In 

the Preliminary Determination, 

Commerce aligned the final CVD 

determination with the final 

determination in the companion 

antidumping duty (AD) investigation, in 

accordance with section 705(a)(1) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(4). 

On January 23, 2018, Commerce 

exercised its discretion to toll all 

deadlines affected by the closure of the 

Federal Government from January 20 

through 22, 2018. In accordance with 

Commerce’s practice, if the new 

deadline falls on a non-business day, 

the deadline will become the next 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES