alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



Section 302 Certification



I, Bradley J Carver, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GlycoGenesys, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) [Paragraph reserved pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];



c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 17, 2004



|    |  |                                             
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Bradley J Carver                        
|    |  | Bradley J Carver Chief Executive Officer and
|    |  | President (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 23.1
Consent of Independent Auditors
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement(Form S-8 No. 333-88805) pertaining to the Borders Group, Inc. 1998 StockOption Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-79559)pertaining to the Borders Group, Inc. Management Stock Purchase Plan, BordersGroup, Inc. Stock Option Plan, Borders Group, Inc. Employee Stock PurchasePlan, Borders Group, Inc. Director Stock Plan, Borders Group, Inc. 401(k) Plan,and Borders Group, Inc. Savings Plan for Employees Working in Puerto Rico ofour report dated March 11, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of Borders Group, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended January 25, 2004.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Detroit, Michigan March 25, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,289
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                       641
<INVENTORY>                                     23,692
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,137
<PP&E>                                          12,864
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,990
<BONDS>                                            149
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               13
<PREFERRED>                                         69
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,432
<SALES>                                         77,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,508
<CGS>                                           47,073
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (570)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (209)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (361)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (361)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23 (b)**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

 

The Board ofDirectors of Newhall Management Corporation

And Partners of The Newhall Land and Farming Company:

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Numbers033-53767, 033-53769, 033-58171, 333-15303 and 333-57591) of The Newhall Landand Farming Company of our report dated January 16, 2001, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheet of The Newhall Land and Farming Company andsubsidiaries as of December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated statementsof income, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the yearsin the two-year period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in theDecember 31, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K of The Newhall Land and FarmingCompany.

 

 
| /S/  KPMG LLP |
|--------------------|

 

 

Los Angeles,California

March 28,2002

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 263 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 93

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 263

                          [Report No. 103-263]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 3116) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 28, 1993

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                  House Calendar No. 93
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 263

                          [Report No. 103-263]

  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 3116) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1993

    Mr. Frost, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 3116) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That points of order against consideration of the bill 
(H.R. 3116) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes, for 
failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XXI are waived. During 
consideration of the bill, all points of order against provisions in 
the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are 
waived except as follows: beginning with ``Provided'' on page 20, line 
17, through ``operations:'' on page 21, line 21; beginning on page 27, 
line 23, through line 25; beginning on page 108, line 20, through page 
109, line 5; and beginning on page 114, line 3, through page 115, line 
10. Where points of order are waived against only part of a paragraph, 
a point of order against matter in the balance of the paragraph may be 
applied only within the balance of the paragraph and not against the 
entire paragraph. Points of order under clause 2 of rule XXI against 
the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution are waived.
```
#### Branch *v.*State.

(Division A.

Dec. 10, 1934.)

[157 So. 875.

No. 31497.]

*302O. I». Kimbrough, of Greenwood, for appellant.

W. D. Conn, Jr., Assistant Attorney-General, for the state.

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the possession of intoxicating liquor. The appellant’s principal assignment of error is that the evidence on which he was convicted, and which was introduced over his objection, was that of a police officer who obtained it by an unlawful search of the appellant’s automobile.

The search was made by the sheriff of the county, who stated that he searched the appellant’s automobile with*303out a warrant therefor on a statement to> him by Coppage that he, Coppage, had been informed that the appellant would drive a Chevrolet coupe into Itta Bena with a load of whisky therein. Acting on this information, the sheriff patrolled the road on which he was informed the appellant would travel to Itta Bena, and when the appellant approached him, driving a Chevrolet coupe, he and others with him halted the appellant, searched his automobile, and found whisky therein. Coppage was not introduced as a witness.

As the attorney-general admits, the case is ruled by Elardo v. State, 164 Miss. 628, 145 So. 615, wherein the court held that the information on which a police officer is authorized to search for contraband articles without a warrant therefor must be communicated to him as facts within the knowledge of the informant. In other words, that the evidence on which the officer acts in making the search must be such as would have served as a predicate for the issuance of a warrant therefor.

Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersignedofficers of Electronic Systems Technology Inc., a Washington corporation (the"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officers' knowledge andbelief, that:The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form      10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ TOM L. KIRCHNER                                                                     /s/ JON CORREIO    Tom L. Kirchner                                                                                 Jon Correio    Chief Executive Officer                                                                     Chief Financial Officer    Date: March 25, 2005                                                                        Date: March 25, 2005
#### Angelo CALICO, Jr. v. EMPLOYERS’ LIABILITY ASSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 54169.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1973.

In re: Angelo Calico, Jr. applying for certiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 284 So.2d 168.

Writ denied. On the facts found, the judgment of the Court of Appeal is correct.

CALOGERO, J., recused.
# C_2021391EN.01000402.xml

| 27.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 391/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 391/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 31 May 2021 — FH v SunExpress Günes Ekspres Havacilik A.S.

(Case C-337/21)

(2021/C 391/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Frankfurt am Main

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant: FH

Defendant and respondent: SunExpress Günes Ekspres Havacilik A.S.

Question referred

Is Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that, where flights with different air carriers are the subject of a single reservation made via an online agency, a right to compensation exists against the operating air carrier of the first leg of the journey where, although the delay in arrival of the flight of the first leg was less than 3 hours, this led to the connecting flight being missed and, as a result, the delay in arrival of the passenger at the final destination was in excess of 3 hours, and where the operating air carrier of the first leg was neither a party to the contract of carriage for the second leg nor aware that a connecting flight had been booked at the same time with a different air carrier?

By order of the President of the Court of Justice of 28 June 2021, the case was removed from the register of the Court.

---

(1)  Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
#### COLLINS RESTAURANT & LOUNGE CORP., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellants, v. LOUNGE INVESTMENTS CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-725.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 4, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 8.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF W.P. STEWART & CO., LTD.
 JURISDICTION OFSubsidiary
    
    INCORPORATIONW.P. Stewart & Co. (Europe), Ltd.
    
    EnglandNS Money Management Ltd.
    
    BermudaCribewell Investments
    
    CuraçaoTPRS Services N.V.
    
    CuraçaoW.P. Stewart & Co., Inc.
    
    DelawareW.P. Stewart Securities Limited
    
    BermudaW.P. Stewart Asset Management Ltd.
    
    BermudaW.P. Stewart Fund Management Limited
    
    IrelandW.P. Stewart Asset Management (NA), Inc.
    
    New YorkW.P. Stewart Asset Management, Inc.
    
    DelawareW.P. Stewart Asset Management (Europe), Ltd.
    
    BermudaW.P. Stewart Asset Management (Curaçao), N.V.
    
    Netherlands AntillesW.P. Stewart Asset Management (Europe), N.V.
    
    The NetherlandsTPR Curaçao N.V.
    
    Netherlands AntillesWPSH Management N.V.
    
    Netherlands AntillesW.P. Stewart Fund Management S.A.
    
    LuxembourgW.P. Stewart/Hartmann Ltd.
    
    Bermuda
[No. 707-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

November 1, 1971.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Raymond Verice Andrews, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 52682, Theodore S. Turner, J., entered June 26, *9231970. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
#### Sarah Lucille GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. John Samuel GRIFFIN, Jr., Appellee.

No. 68-441.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

May 21, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Opinion issued May 16, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00131-CV

———————————

CHARLOTTE DUBRAY, Appellant

V.

3DDY’S TRUCKING, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 212th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 21-CV-0322

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. No opinion 

has issued.

The Court grants the motion and dismisses this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a); 43.2(f). Any other pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.
#### DEVELOPMENT FINANCING CORP. v. David MOFFETT.

No. 45462.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 3, 1969.

Thomas L. Wallace, Biloxi, for appellant.

Wiesenburg & Lockard, Pascagoula, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
 
 The Board of Directors
 Earth Search Sciences, Inc.
 Lakeside, Montana
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2003 (File No. 333-106630) of our opinion, relating to the consolidated financial statements appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Earth Search Sciences, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
 
 
 /s/ MaloneBailey, LLP
 Houston, Texas
 www.malone-bailey.com
 August 16, 2010
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■

■ ■

★

● ●

●

●

★

● ●

●

●
# C_2021242EN.01001402.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 14 April 2021 — I.L. v Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet

(Case C-241/21)

(2021/C 242/19)

Language of the case: Estonian

Referring court

Riigikohus

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: I.L.

Respondent: Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet

Question referred

Is the first sentence of Article 15(1) of Directive 2008/115/EC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that Member States may keep in detention a third-country national in respect of whom there is a real risk that, while at liberty and prior to removal, he or she will commit a criminal offence, the investigation and punishment of which may substantially impede the execution of the removal process?

---

(1)  Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98, corrigendum OJ 2019 L 240, p. 17).

---
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Billy Ray DAVIDSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 53254.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 20, 1973.

In re: Billy Ray Davidson applying for writs of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ granted. (See order attached).

The petition of the relator, m the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable William T. Bennett, Judge of the Twentieth Judicial District Court for the Parish of West Feliciana, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 18th day of June, 1973, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BONTEX,
INC.'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AS SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
10-Q, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 224
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                           182
<INVENTORY>                                          6,465
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    17,393
<PP&E>                                              24,952
<DEPRECIATION>                                      13,376
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      30,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               18,021
<BONDS>                                              3,270
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  157
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                           9,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        30,235
<SALES>                                              8,059
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     8,074
<CGS>                                                6,138
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        8,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        56
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (683)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (144)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (539)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (539)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.34)



</TABLE>