alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021138EN.01001802.xml

| 19.4.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/18

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court (Ireland) made on 14 January 2021 — SRS, AA v Minister for Justice and Equality

(Case C-22/21)

(2021/C 138/24)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Supreme Court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: SRS, AA

Defendant: Minister for Justice and Equality

Questions referred

| 1. | Can the term member of the household of an EU citizen, as used in Article 3 of Directive 2004/38/EC (1), be defined so as to be of universal application throughout the EU and if so what is that definition? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can the term member of the household of an EU citizen, as used in Article 3 of Directive 2004/38/EC (1), be defined so as to be of universal application throughout the EU and if so what is that definition?

| 2. | If that term cannot be defined, by what criteria are judges to look at evidence so that national courts may decide according to a settled list of factors who is or who is not a member of the household of an EU citizen for the purpose of freedom of movement? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If that term cannot be defined, by what criteria are judges to look at evidence so that national courts may decide according to a settled list of factors who is or who is not a member of the household of an EU citizen for the purpose of freedom of movement?

---

(1)  Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (OJ 2004, L 158, p. 77).

---
ex_232262.htm


 


Exhibit 10.17


 


Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy


 


Compensation for our non-employee directors consists of cash, restricted stock units and stock options. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the compensation paid to non-employee directors for their service on the Board and its committees and recommends any changes considered appropriate to the full Board for its approval. Each member of our Board who is not our employee receives an annual retainer of $40,000. In addition, our non-employee directors receive the following cash compensation for Board services, as applicable:


 


	 	
			•

				
			the Board Chair receives an additional annual retainer of $30,000;

			



 


	 	
			•

				
			the Audit Committee Chair receives an additional annual retainer of $20,000;

			



 


	 	
			•

				
			the Compensation Committee Chair receives an additional annual retainer of $15,000;

			



 


	 	
			•

				
			the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair receives an additional annual retainer of $10,000;

			



 


	 	
			•

				
			an Audit Committee member receives an additional annual retainer of $10,000;

			



 


	 	
			•

				
			a Compensation Committee member receives an additional annual retainer of $7,500; and

			



 


	 	
			•

				
			a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee member receives an additional retainer of $5,000.

			



 


Beginning in February 2021, upon election or appointment to our Board, a new non-employee director will be granted an initial stock option to purchase 30,000 shares of our common stock, which will vest as to 1/3rd of the shares subject to the option on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant and as to the remaining shares subject to the option on an equal monthly basis over the following two-year period, and 15,000 RSUs, which will vest as to 1/3rd of the RSUs on each anniversary of the date of grant over a three-year period. Each non-employee director who is then serving as a director or who is elected to our Board on the date of an annual meeting will be granted a stock option to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock, which will vest in full on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, and 10,000 RSUs, which will vest in full on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant.


 


All Board and committee retainers accrue and are payable on a quarterly basis at the end of each calendar quarter of service. We reimburse our non-employee directors for travel, lodging and other reasonable expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at Board or committee meetings.
#### Joseph POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 811.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District..

Jan. 22, 1968.

W. D. Frederick, Jr., Public Defender, Orlando, and Joseph Powell, in pro. per., for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., Vero Beach, for appellee.

*48WALDEN, Chief Judge.

ON MOTION FOR A COPY OF APPELLEE’S BRIEF, AND TIME TO FILE REPLY

This motion was filed in propria persona by defendant-appellant, Joseph Powell.

The defendant was tried and found guilty of murder in the second degree. The public defender was duly directed to represent the indigent defendant on appeal. It appears that the appellate process has been tracked. The public defender has filed the appellant’s brief and the state has filed its brief in response.

However, defendant, claiming a right to represent himself independently and in addition to the efforts being expended on his behalf by the public defender, filed his separate brief. In other words, defendant contends that he is entitled both to be represented by the public defender and to be represented by himself, in propria persona, “ * * * reserving the right to let his counsel perfect those points in the brief prepared by counsel, if counsel so desires.” He rests this contention on Section 11, Declaration of Rights, Florida Constitution, F. S.A.

This contention has been answered as concerns procedures in Florida trial courts. The rule is that a defendant represented by counsel has no absolute right to participate and represent himself and that the matter is subject to the exercise of sound discretion by the trial courts.1

We believe the rule to be sound and equally applicable and needed in the appellate courts of this state. Absent some compelling reason reflected in an application for permission and absent this court’s consent for an appellant to represent himself and to be also represented by counsel, we believe that a party on appeal represented by counsel has no right, in propria persona, to file additional briefs and appellate papers. To permit this would clearly interfere with the time schedules and the filing and service of papers. Such practice would frustrate and confuse the appellate process and administration of justice.

It appearing that defendant is being adequately and effectively represented by counsel, it is ordered that:

> 1. Appellant’s in propria persona brief filed on October 31, 1967, is stricken sua sponte.

> 2. Appellant’s in propria persona motion for a copy of appellee’s brief, and time to file reply is denied.

McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.

1

. Thompson v. State, Fla.App.1967, 194 So.2d 649. See also 77 A.L.R.2d 1233.
260 La. 689

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Billy PERRY v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52099.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 8, 1972.

In re: Billy Perry applying for writs of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Application denied. Since the case has been assigned for hearing in the trial court on February 14, 1972, the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction is unwarranted.
Exhibit 4.2


 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM


 


We have issued our report dated March 16, 2021, with respect
to the financial statement of m+ funds Trust, Series 1-17 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6
(File No. 333-252545) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


 


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


March 16, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 78 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 78

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
    investigations and studies by the Committee on Public Works and 
 Transportation in the first session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1993

 Mr. Mineta submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
    investigations and studies by the Committee on Public Works and 
 Transportation in the first session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

    Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and studies by 
the Committee on Public Works and Transportation (hereinafter in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including expenses for--
            (1) procurement of consultant services under section 202(i) 
        of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946; and
            (2) provision of assistance for members of professional 
        staff in obtaining specialized training under section 202(j) of 
        such Act;
there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House not more 
than $3,103,247.
    (b) Not more than $50,000 of the amount specified in subsection (a) 
may be used for consultant services referred to in paragraph (1) of 
such subsection and not more than $30,000 of such amount may be used 
for specialized training referred to in paragraph (2) of such 
subsection.
    Sec. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers 
authorized by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, 
and approved by the Committee on House Administration.
    Sec. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolution for 
investigations and studies carried out during the period beginning at 
noon on January 3, 1993, and ending immediately before noon on January 
3, 1994.
    Sec. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution shall be 
expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on 
House Administration.

                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20038 Conference Calendar

RAY LEE MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BROWN & wILLIAMSON; RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CV-2116

-------------------- April 11, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ray Lee Morgan, Texas prisoner # 299341, challenges the district court’s dismissal as frivolous of his civil lawsuit against two tobacco companies, alleging that they had caused him to become addicted to tobacco, which he has smoked for 35 years, injuring his respiratory system. Morgan has not alleged any basis for federal jurisdiction, and the district court’s dismissal of his complaint was thus
proper. See Bickford v. Int’l Speedway Corp. , 654 F.2d 1028,No. 01-20038 -2- 1031 (5th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 30920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XG321


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Committee and 
River Herring and Shad Committee of the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management 
Council (Council) will hold a joint meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, July 18, 2018, from 8:30 
a.m. to 12:30 p.m.. For agenda details, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar with a telephone-only 
audio connection to participate: http://mafmc.adobeconnect.com/msb-rh-s/. Telephone instructions are provided upon connecting, or the public 
can call direct: (800) 832-0736, Rm: *7833942#.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331 or 
on their website at www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is to develop 
recommendations to the Council on the pending framework action that 
addresses Atlantic mackerel rebuilding, 2019-21 Atlantic mackerel 
specifications, and the river herring and shad cap for the Atlantic 
mackerel fishery.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to M. Jan Saunders, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to any meeting date.

    Dated: June 27, 2018.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-14136 Filed 6-29-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, a Department of the State of Florida, Petitioner, v. George L. HOWARD, State of Florida Department of Administration, the Career Service Commission, Respondents.

No. Q-160.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 1972.

Rehearing Denied April 21, 1972.

Rivers Buford, Jr., and Gene T. Sellers, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Roger W. Foote. Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari denied.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               7
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1459
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                       1385
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3025
<PP&E>                                           14012
<DEPRECIATION>                                    7648
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   13108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2693
<BONDS>                                           3954
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                        3567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     13108
<SALES>                                           9844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  9844
<CGS>                                             7691
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     7691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   710
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    354
<INCOME-TAX>                                       151
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                203
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       203
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.21
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely in connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report
of Retractable Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Thomas J.
Shaw, Chief Executive Officer, and Douglas W. Cowan, Chief Financial Officer, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Thomas J. ShawTHOMAS J. SHAW PRESIDENT, CHAIRMAN, AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/s/ Douglas W. CowanDOUGLAS W. COWAN CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
# C_2020255EN.01002601.xml

| 3.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/26

---

Action brought on 29 May 2020 — EAB v EUIPO (RADIOSHUTTLE)

(Case T-341/20)

(2020/C 255/33)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: EAB AB (Smålandsstenar, Sweden) (represented by: J. Norderyd and C. Sundén, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for registration of EU word mark RADIOSHUTTLE — Application No 179 709 13

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2020 in Case R 1428/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision, and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision, and

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c) and 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c) and 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

Subject: 

From: 

To: 

Summary of Stakeholder Meetings 

Carissa Cyran 

Dockets EPA-I IQ-OAR-20 13-0602. EPA-HQ-OAR-20 13-0603. and EPA-1 IQOA R-20 13-0495 

This memorandum summarizes meetings with stakeholders during the week of June 22. 20 15. 

On June 23, Associate Assistant Administrator for Climate and Senior Counsel for Air and 

Rad iation .J oseph Goffman met with representati ves from the National Alliance or Forest 

Owners. ign-in sheet attached. 

On June 24, Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation Janet McCabe and Associate 

Assistant Administrator for Climate and Senior Counsel for Air and Radi ation Joseph Goffman 

met with Governor o f the Stale of Hawaii David lge and Cindy McMillan. Director of 

Communications for the State of Hawaii. 

Internet Address (URL) · http //www epa gov 

Rec ycled/Recyclable • Pr•nted w•th Vegetable Od Based Inks on IOO'o Postconsumer Process Chlorone Free Recycled Paper 
Date: June 23, 2015 

Meeting: General Discussion 

Rule(s) Discussed: c,p p 

Written Materials? ~ 

Name Organization Phone Number 

---'---N~b 

'>--/------- --#-n-F--1- --j _....:::...... EJ.r__:;_llf=-J__~_ 2 tJ 2 561/ Z7P 1 

~ I
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 492 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 492

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 28, 1994.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (S. 208) to reform the concessions policies of the National Park Service, 
and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 
Points of order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply with 
section 302(f) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are waived. General 
debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Natural Resources. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to 
consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 
rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Natural Resources now printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in 
the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each section 
of the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute, as modified, shall be 
considered as read. Points of order against the committee amendment in the 
nature of a substitute, as modified, for failure to comply with clause 5(a) of 
rule XXI are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 
amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such 
amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in 
the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or 
to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute, as modified. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 
thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<page>
					  EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Diversified
Futures Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis,
President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President

Date:		March 23, 2007