alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

Duke Marshall Marshall Unit 3

1 8/3/2010 8:50 8/3/2010

2 8/3/2010 11:06 8/3/2010

3 8/3/2010 12:37 8/3/2010

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date
Measured Value 

(ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used 

10:03 [<0.0575] Dry Method 26A

12:16 [<0.0570] Dry Method 26A

13:49 [<0.0561] Dry Method 26A

Method 26A

Method 26A

Method 26A

Test End Time

Chlorine Emission Test Results
Data Flag (ADL, 

BDL, DDL)

Test Method 

Comments

BDL RL based on MDL[<0.00017] 12.5

BDL RL based on MDL[<0.00017] 12.9

BDL RL based on MDL[<0.00016] 12.9

Calculated 

Emission Rate 

(lb/mmBtu)

Steam Output 

(1000 lb/hr)

Total Heat 

Input 

(mmBtu/hr)

Flue Gas 

Moisture 

(%)
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

11.39 8.08 1,926,479 122.5

11.45 8.01 1,923,024 123.9

11.42 8.00 1,899,892 124

Flue Gas 

Flow Rate 

(dscfm)

Flue Gas 

Temperature 

(F)

Fuel #1 Flue Gas 

CO2 (%)

Flue Gas 

O2 (%)
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Fuel #2 Fuel #3
Fuel Input 

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure

Measurement 

Method

Other Supporting Information

Fuel #4
EXHIBIT 2.1 - Form 8-K dated November 2, 1999

                UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                           WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549


                                    FORM 8-K



                                 CURRENT REPORT
   Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                       Date of Report:  November 2,  1999




                       ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY INC.
                           (A Washington Corporation)

                         Commission File no. 000-27793
                   IRS Employer Identification no. 91-1238077

                              415 N. Quay St. #4
                             Kennewick  WA  99336
                   (Address of principal executive offices)


     Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(509) 735-9092



























<PAGE>
ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS

On November 2, 1999, the Company was notified by Software Corporation
Of America (SCA), with whom the Company teams with in Mobile Data Computer
(MDC) projects, that SCA had been acquired by Motorola Corporation, a
competitor of the Company in certain markets.  After consultation with
Management of SCA, the Company was assured that the Company's business
relationship with SCA is not expected to change, due to Motorola's market
strategy differing from the Company's in the MDC marketplace.


















































<PAGE>
                                SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned here unto duly authorized.

ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC.


    /s/   T.L. KIRCHNER

By: T.L. Kirchner
President
Date: November 9, 1999
1

Sutton, Lisa

From: Mastro, Donna

Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 7:04 AM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Sutton, Lisa; Johansen, Amy

Subject: FW: SSM SIP Call Final Rule

Attachments: McCabe letter to air directors final SSM SIP call 05-22-15.pdf; SSM SIP final rule_Fact 

Sheet.pdf

WV

Donna L. Mastro - EPA Region III – ORC - Air Branch Chief - (215) 814-2777 

From: Esher, Diana  

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:49 PM

To: Fred Durham; laura.m.crowder@wv.gov

Cc: Mastro, Donna; Arnold, David; Fernandez, Cristina; Johansen, Amy

Subject: SSM SIP Call Final Rule

I’m writing to inform you that earlier today, the Administrator signed a final action to ensure states have in 

place air pollution rules that apply to sources at all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, or 

malfunction (SSM). 

EPA is calling for 36 states, including your state, to make changes to their State Implementation Plans (SIPs), to 

protect public health and ensure consistency with the Clean Air Act and EPA’s current SSM Policy. In 

response to this action, your state will need to correct specific SSM provisions in your state plan as indicated in 

the final action. 

The Clean Air Act allows a maximum of 18 months from the issuance of the final action to submit a SIP 

revision. Therefore your revised SIP submission is due to EPA by November 22, 2016. 

For your information, here is the link to the pre-publication version of the final action signed today. 

http://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/emissions.html

SSM provisions for West Virginia are addressed in final action’s prepublication version, under section IX, at 

subsection D. 4 (p. 457). 

I have also attached a copy of a notification letter signed by Acting Assistant Administrator Janet McCabe and a 

copy of the SSM Fact Sheet for your information. 

We will continue to work closely with you to ensure this SIP revision process is as efficient as possible. Please 

let me know if your have any questions. 

Diana Esher 

Director, Air Protection Division 

EPA Region 3 

215-814-2706 

esher.diana@epa.gov
# C_2020175EN.01003302.xml

| 25.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/33

---

Action brought on 20 March 2020 — Tornado Boats International v EUIPO — Haygreen (TORNADO)

(Case T-167/20)

(2020/C 175/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Tornado Boats International ApS (Lystrup, Denmark) (represented by: M. Hoffgaard Rasmussen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: David Haygreen (Colwyn Bay, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trademark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark TORNADO — European Union trade mark No 10 097 368

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 January 2020 in Case R 1169/2018-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | reject the cancellation. |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the cancellation.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
p. 1



# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 114 ) ll-K-(B)-10 3 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:52 AM Sheet 114 of 325P. 2

_ = 

# f ) ENERG

YAN D ENVIRONMENTA L ANALYSIS , INC . "-MBM0 3

Apri l 6 , 198 3

Mr . Rober t Shor t Economi c Analysi s Branch U.S . Environmenta l ProtectionAgenc y Mai l Drop-1 2 Researc hTriangl e Park , N C 2771 1 Subject : EP

A Contrac t No . 68-02-3564 , WorkAssignmen t # 9 Dea r Robert : Attache di s th

e propose dindustria l fossi l fue l deman dprojection s for th e industria l boile r NSP S SO - impac t analysis . Thes e projection s ar e consisten t wit hthe proposedindustria l fossi l fue l pric e forecast s datedApri l 4 , 1983 . 

### Sincerely ,



# J. /yO~s~ kfefy*^- Ti m Hogan TH:m k Attachmen t cc : A l WeheP. 3

,...-*• . r. » "

PROJECTION S O F INDUSTRIAL FOSSI L FUE L DEMAND ' (IO 1 2 Btu )

Demand Regio n 

### 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 . 

### 10 . Ne wEngland Ne wYork/Ne wJerse y Middl e Atlanti c Sout hAtlanti c Midwes t Southwes t Centra l Nort hCentra l Wes t Northwes t U.S . TOTAL 198 5 206. 2 528. 6 1,021. 3 1,450. 1 2,194. 8 3,284. 8 496. 4 371. 8 697. 5 350. 1 10,601. 5 199 0 227. 0 582. 2 1,127. 6 1,604. 9 2,3f2. 5 3,602. 8 530. 4 405. 3 794. 7 389. 5 11,576. 9 199 5 247. 5 637. 8 1,224.9 , 1,754. 0 2,506. 7 3,948. 8 581. 8 438. 1 858. 4 421. 5 12,619. 4

Include s coal , residua l an d distillat e fue l oi l an d natura l ga s con sumptio n i n boiler s an d proces s hea t equipment . Exclude s fue l demand fo r feedstock s o r rawmaterials .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         817,796
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               817,796
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 817,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,528
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,591,201)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   817,796
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               840,953
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               493,216
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             437,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (89,263)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (89,263)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (89,263)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2022064EN.01000501.xml

| 7.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/5

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Belgium) — Monument Vandekerckhove NV v Stad Gent

(Case C-316/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 2014/24/EU - Conduct of the procedure - Choice of participants and award of contracts - Article 63 - Tenderer relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority - Failure to meet the requirements relating to the technical and professional ability of the tenderer by the entity on whose capacities the tenderer intends to rely - Obligation to allow that tenderer to replace that entity - Principle of proportionality)

(2022/C 64/06)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Monument Vandekerckhove NV

Defendant: Stad Gent

Other parties: Denys NV, Aelterman BVBA

Operative part of the order

The second subparagraph of Article 63(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, read in conjunction with the principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination and proportionality as set out in Article 18(1) of that directive, must be interpreted as meaning that, where it ascertains that an entity on whose capacity an economic operator intends to rely does not fulfil the selection criteria, the contracting authority is obliged to request that the economic operator replace that entity, if it does not wish to be excluded from the public procurement procedure concerned.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.

---
#### Ellie G. IRVIN v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 46696.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 15, 1972.

Johnny N. Tackett, Aberdeen, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by John M. Kinard, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

RODGERS, Presiding Justice.

The appellant Ellie G. Irvin was indicted by the Grand Jury of Monroe County, Mississippi, on a charge of pointing, aiming and discharging a deadly weapon at and toward one Bobby McKay. He was con*242victed and sentenced to serve a term of six months in the county jail and to pay a fine of five hundred dollars ($500.00). One-half of the fine and three months of the jail sentence were suspended.

The appellant has appealed from this judgment and now contends that the trial court was in error in granting an instruction defining the burden of proof in that the court failed to require the State to prove the guilt of the defendant to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis consistent with defendant’s innocence. Moreover, it is said that the overwhelming weight of the evidence was against a verdict of guilt, therefore, the court should have directed a verdict of not guilty.

We have examined the testimony and instructions shown in the record on appeal, and we are convinced that the testimony presented a factual issue for the jury and that the instructions given the jury were proper.

The trial court does not restrict the State to instructions requiring proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence, except in cases where the gist of the crime is based upon circumstantial evidence. Anderson v. State, 246 Miss. 821, 152 So.2d 702 (1963).

In the instant case there is substantial and sufficient eyewitness testimony to the crime of pointing and aiming a pistol at the prosecuting witness by the defendant — not in self-defense nor in the lawful discharge of official duty. It is true that these witnesses did not see the gun fire, but they heard it fire. Hearing is one of the five senses by which a witness may perceive another person’s actions. Moreover, in the instant case the defendant testified that he shot at the tires of the automobile in which the prosecuting witness made his escape. In order to sustain a conviction under Section 2013, Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated (1956) it is not necessary to show that the defendant shot at or intended to kill the prosecuting witness. It is only necessary to show that the defendant discharged the firearm “so intentionally pointed or aimed.”

The sentence and judgment of the trial court are affirmed.

Affirmed.

BRADY, PATTERSON, SMITH and SUGG, JJ., concur.
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| June 7, 2011                          |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                  |   |   |
|                                  |   |   |
|  /s/ C. NICHOLAS KEATING, JR.    |   |   |
|                                  |   |   |
| C. Nicholas Keating, Jr.              |   |   |
|                                  |   |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

----
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                  ------------
         Section 1350 Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and
                           Principal Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of 1st Independence
Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2006 (the  "Report") of the Company  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  and  the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 1, 2006       /s/ N. William White
                                --------------------------------
                                Name:     N. William White
                                Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)


                            /s/ R. Michael Wilbourn
                                --------------------------------
                                Name:     R. Michael Wilbourn
                                Title:    Executive Vice President
                                          and Chief Financial Officer
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1,095,824
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                   350,000
<INVENTORY>                                    201,574
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,513,684
<PP&E>                                         513,098
<DEPRECIATION>                                 276,455
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,211,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          570,631
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,520
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,636,732
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,211,883
<SALES>                                        454,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               454,439
<CGS>                                          1,318,314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,318,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               491,581
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,305
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,434,229)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,434,229)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,434,229)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.97)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 131 (Monday, July 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14640]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Line 
Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone 
Line Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel 
is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, August 14, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4115.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone 
Line Project Committee will be held Tuesday, August 14, 2018, at 3:00 
p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make 
oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to 
limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Rosalind Matherne. For more information please contact 
Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115, or write TAP 
Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or 
contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will 
include various IRS issues.
    The committee will be discussing toll-free issues and public input 
is welcomed.

    Dated: July 2, 2018.
Terrie English,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2018-14640 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. David DENNIS, Relator, v. L. L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-269.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 24, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas Corpus dismissed.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |                                          |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | **/s/** **S****TEPHEN****R. W****HERRY** |
|   | Stephen                            R. Wherry Senior                            Vice President, Chief Financial Officer(Principal                            Financial and Accounting Officer), Treasurer                            and Assistant Secretary August                            14, 2007 |

----