Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2021
                              Cristina Tobon-Chung, FNP, DAB CR5848 (2021)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Cristina Tobon-Chung, FNP, DAB CR5848 (2021)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Cristina Tobon-Chung, FNP,
(NPI: 1053735019),
Petitioner,

v.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-19-652Decision No. CR5848April 8, 2021

        
              
    

      DECISION

Petitioner, Cristina Tobon-Chung, is a nurse practitioner, licensed in Florida, who, until October 10, 2018, participated in the Medicare program as a supplier of services.  The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) revoked her enrollment, pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(7), because she knowingly allowed other suppliers to use her billing number.

Petitioner appeals the revocation.

I find that CMS appropriately revoked Petitioner Tobon-Chung's Medicare enrollment because she allowed other suppliers to bill the program under her billing number.

Background

In a revocation notice, dated September 10, 2018, the Medicare contractor, Noridian Healthcare Solutions, advised Petitioner Tobon-Chung that it revoked her Medicare enrollment, effective October 10, 2018.  The contractor also imposed a three-year reenrollment bar.  As the notice letter explains, the contractor acted pursuant to 42 C.F.R.

**Page 2**

§ 424.535(a)(7), because Petitioner allowed four other nurse practitioners, three of whom were not enrolled in Medicare, to bill the program using her National Provider Identifier (NPI) number.  CMS Ex. 3.

Petitioner requested reconsideration.  CMS Ex. 2; P. Ex. 1.  In a reconsidered determination, dated February 7, 2019, a CMS hearing officer affirmed the revocation, finding that Petitioner knowingly allowed five (not four) nurse practitioners to bill the Medicare program using her NPI.  CMS therefore properly revoked her billing privileges under section 424.535(a)(7).  CMS Ex. 1 at 5.1

Petitioner again appealed.

**Summary judgment**.  Although CMS has moved for summary judgment, I find that this matter may be decided on the written record, without considering whether the standards for summary judgment are satisfied.  In my initial order, I instructed each party to submit the written direct testimony of any proposed witnesses and, if it wished to cross-examine an opposing witness, to state so affirmatively.  Acknowledgment and Pre-hearing Order at 5 (¶¶ 8, 9) (April 11, 2019).  CMS listed no witnesses.  Petitioner listed three witnesses and provided their written direct testimony (P. Exs. 3, 4, 5).  CMS objects to the testimony of Petitioner's witnesses, arguing that it is irrelevant.  In the alternative, CMS asks to cross-examine the witnesses.

In fact, I find that the testimony is relevant.  Petitioner and her witnesses attack an attestation statement that CMS cites (CMS Ex. 4), but, in doing so, they also admit that the substance of that statement is accurate:  she allowed others, with whom she worked, to use her Medicare billing number.  I am authorized to admit testimony and documentary evidence that is relevant and material.  42 C.F.R. § 498.60(b).  Because I find this testimony relevant and material, I admit it.

For reasons that I do not understand, CMS has asked to cross-examine Petitioner's witnesses.  As the following discussion shows, nothing elicited through cross‐examination would change the outcome here, so I deny CMS's request.  I find that an in-person hearing would serve no purpose and that I may decide this case based on the written record without considering whether the standards for summary judgment are met.  *See* Acknowledgment and Pre-hearing Order at 6 (¶ 10).2

**Page 3**

CMS has filed a pre-hearing brief and motion for summary judgment (CMS Br.), with five exhibits (CMS Exs. 1-5).  Petitioner filed a pre-hearing brief and response to CMS's motion (P. Br.), with five exhibits (P. Exs. 1-5), including the testimony of her three witnesses.  I admit into evidence CMS Exs. 1-5 and P. Exs. 1-5.  CMS filed a reply.

Discussion

***Because Petitioner Tobon-Chung knowingly allowed four other nurse practitioners to bill the Medicare program using her NPI, CMS properly revoked her Medicare enrollment.  42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(7)***.3

CMS regulates the Medicare enrollment of providers and suppliers.  Social Security Act (Act) § 1866(j)(1)(A).  A supplier enrolled in the Medicare program "is prohibited from . . . allowing another individual to use its Medicare billing number."  42 C.F.R. § 424.550(a).  CMS may revoke a supplier's enrollment if the supplier "knowingly sells to or allows another individual to use its billing number."  42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(7).  Under section 424.535(a)(7), "a basis for revocation exists whenever a supplier knowingly permits another individual or entity to use its billing number to claim payment for any services."  *Kermit E. White, M.D., & Kermit E. White, M.D., P.C.*, DAB No. 2765 at 7 (2017).

Here, Petitioner concedes that she allowed other nurse practitioners, with whom she worked, to bill the Medicare program using her NPI.  P. Br. at 3  ("Petitioner admits that five [family nurse practitioners] were 'working under her NPI number.'"); *see* P. Ex. 3 at 1, 2 (Tobon-Chung Decl. ¶¶ 5, 8); P. Ex. 4 at 2 (Chung Decl. ¶ 9); P. Ex. 5 at 2 (Rosas Decl. ¶ 8).  CMS was therefore authorized to revoke her Medicare enrollment and billing privileges.

Petitioner, however, claims that she acted out of ignorance rather than from any intent to defraud the Medicare program.  She characterizes her actions as an "education" issue, rather than fraud.  Notwithstanding section 424.550(a), she maintains that she simply did not know that it was improper to allow others to use her NPI.  Because she acted out of ignorance, she argues, she did not "knowingly" violate the Medicare regulations.  P. Br. at 3-4; P. Ex. 3, *passim*.

**Page 4**

In support of this, Petitioner points to the results of an audit performed by a Medicare Unified Program Integrity Contractor (UPIC).  P. Ex. 2 at 42, 122-125, 255-261.  According to Petitioner, the "investigation determined that the billing errors were not fraud or abuse, and that this was just a provider education issue."  P. Br. at 4.  There are two problems with this position:  first, that is not what the audit concluded; and, second, even if it were, it is irrelevant.

I did not see a specific audit finding that exonerated Petitioner.4
  Rather, the auditors concluded that, because of improper billing practices from March 3, 2017 through May 4, 2018, the Medicare program overpaid her a total of $784,172.  P. Ex. 2 at 258.  The UPIC also reminded her that she is "charged with knowledge of pertinent coverage requirements for services provided and billing procedures" and "has a duty to familiarize [herself] with the legal requirements for cost reimbursement."  Because she participates in the program, she is "considered to have constructive knowledge of CMS manual instructions, bulletins, contractors' written guides, and directives."  P. Ex. 2 at 260.

Another UPIC notice, dated February 5, 2019, warns Petitioner that action taken pursuant to the audit "**does not relieve you of any civil or criminal liability, nor does it offer a defense to any further administrative, civil, or criminal actions against you**."  P. Ex. 2 at 261 (emphasis in original).

Moreover, section 424.535(a)(7) does not require a finding of intentional fraud.  That Petitioner knowingly allowed others – including individuals who were not enrolled in the program – to use her NPI justifies the revocation.  Her purported ignorance does not excuse the conduct.  When she enrolled in the program, she promised to abide by Medicare laws, regulations, and program instructions and had a duty to familiarize herself with those requirements.  *Gulf South Med.. & Surgical Inst. and Kenner Dermatology Clinic, Inc.*, DAB No. 2400 at 9 (2011) and cases cited therein.  Thus, even if Petitioner accurately characterized the audit results, they are irrelevant.

Because of her impossibly high billing, a CMS investigator interviewed Petitioner and obtained a written attestation in which she admitted allowing others to use her NPI.  CMS Ex. 4.  Petitioner makes much of the CMS investigator's conduct in obtaining that attestation and maintains that she neither understood nor agreed to its contents.  She claims that the investigator directed her to change the statement "we are 5 FNP [family nurse practitioners] working under my NPI" to "we are 5 FNP billing under my NPI."  CMS Ex. 4 at 1; P. Ex. 3 at 1-2 (Tobon-Chung Decl. ¶ 5).  I do not consider this a substantive change.  Moreover, the attestation also says that the "group work is billed to Medicare under my NPI," and Petitioner has not challenged that statement.  CMS Ex. 4 at

**Page 5**

1; P. Ex. 1 at 11.  Indeed, independent of the attestation, Petitioner concedes that she allowed others to bill, using her NPI.  P. Ex. 3 at 2 (Tobon-Chung Decl. ¶¶ 7, 8).  I therefore find her complaints irrelevant.

Finally, I have no authority to provide equitable relief nor to reduce the length of the enrollment bar.  *Cornelius M. Donohue, DPM*, DAB No. 2888 at 10 (2018); *Mohammad Nawaz, M.D., PA*, DAB No. 2687 at 15-16 (2016).

Conclusion

I affirm CMS's determination.  CMS may revoke Petitioner Tobon-Chung's Medicare enrollment because she knowingly allowed others to bill the Medicare program using her NPI, in contravention of 42 C.F.R. § 424.550(a).  42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(7).


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. Although five suppliers billed under Petitioner's NPI, one of them was Petitioner herself. back to note 1
                      2. In the alternative, no material facts are in dispute, and this case could be decided on summary judgment.  See Fal-Meridian, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 604 F.3d 445, 449 (7th Cir. 2010) ("All it means for a decision to be based on a grant of summary judgment is that there are no issues that would benefit from being resolved in an evidentiary hearing."). back to note 2
                      3. My findings of fact/conclusions of law are set forth, in italics and bold, in the discussion captions of this decision. back to note 3
                      4. The audit documents are buried in the 417-page P. Ex. 2.  Petitioner cites to the exhibit number only, leaving it to the judge to pore through the exhibit in search of the provisions upon which she relies. back to note 4 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back