UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 8 1595 Wynkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202·1129 Phone 800-227·8917 hllp:/Iwww.epa.gov/regionOB

Ref: 8P-AR CERTIFIED MAli.

- RETlJR RECEIPT REQUESTED Kenneth Cole Plant Manager Roseburg Forest Products Company P.O. Box 4007 

### Missoula. Montana 59806 RE: Request for Additional Reasonable Progress Information for the Roseburg Forest Products Company

- Missoula Particleboard Facility Pursuant to Section I14(a) ofthe Clean AirAct (42 U.S.C. Section 7414(a») Dear Mr. Cole: 

### As you know. onJuly 

### 19.2006. the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) receiveda letter from the Montana DepartmentofEnvironmental Quality (MDEQ) that stated 

### it was withdrawing its efforts to adopt a stale implementation plan (SIP) for regional haze under EPA's Regional Haze Rule (RHR), found at 40 

### eFR 51.308. Due to Montana's announcement that it would not 

### be addressing the requirements under40 CFR 51.308. EPA Region 8 is moving forward with the technical and policy work needed to implement the requirements ofthe RHR under a Federal implementation plan (FIP). See Section IlO(c)(I) ofthe Clean AirAct (CAA). 42 U.s.C. §7410(c)(I). As part ofoureffort to address requirements underthe RHR for reasonable progress (RP) goals and strategies (see 40 CFR 51 J08(d)(I) and 51.308(dX3)). we previously requested infonnaLion regarding the Roseburg Forest Products Company's Missoula Particleboard Facility. We have reviewed the infonnaLion that you submittcd dated April 14. 2009 in response to OUT January 29. 2009 CAt\. Section 114 information request on the emission units at your facility. Based on the emissions and currentcontrol technology infonnation you submitted. the sander dust boiler and sanderdust burners are sources that warrant further analysis in considering and developing strategies 

### torachieving the RP goal for MonLana. Please submit an analysis ofcontrol options for these units postmarked within 60 days of the date ofthis letter. The analysis must address the four factors included in 40 CFR 

### § 51.308(d)(1 )(i)(A)· the costs ofcompliance. the time necessary for compliancc. theenergy and non-airquality environmental impacts ofcompliance. and**th~** remaining useful Iifc of the potentially atfected sources. We suggest thatthe BestAvailable Retrotit Technology (BART) Guidelines (sec 40 eFR Part 51 Appendix Y) provide additional guidance on how 10 perfonll the cost ofcompliance portion ofthis analysis. Your analysis lllust considerthe full range ofavuilable control technologies and for each technology. you lllust considerthe full range ofemission standards including the most stringent. We understand this is acomplicated endeavor. and we arc available to answer any questions thmyou may have on the RHR orthe RP analysis. We will assist you in any way we can and look forward to working with you. Pursuant to Section 114 ofthe Clean AirAct. 42 U.S.C. *7414. and under authority duly delegated to the undersigned. you are required to provide us with the information specified in this letter. This information will be used by EPA in developing aregional hale FIP. or in the event MDEQ resumes development ora regional haze SIP. in assisting MDEQ in thateffort and/or reviewing aregional haze SIP [or Montana. Furthennore. infonnation requests pursuant to Section 114 ofthe CAA are not limited to sources that are regulated by the particularrule EPA is implementing. Forexample. Section 114(a)(1) says that EPA may gather infonnation from '·any person who owns oroperates any emission source" or "who the Administratorbdieves may have infonnation necessary for the purposes set forth in this subsection." A duly authorized officeroragent ofthe facility mustcertify as true. accurate, and complete the response to this infonnationby signing the enclosed Statement ofCertification and returning it with the response. Such officeroragent must have sufficient knowledge and authority to make such representations on behalfofthe Roseburg Forest Products Company. Please submit your response to: U.s. Environmental Protection Agency Region VII1 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver. CO 80202-1129 Attention: Vanessa Ilinkle, 8P-AR Pursuant to Section 114(e) ofthe CAA. 42 U.S.c. §7414(c). and 40 C.F.R. Part2. Subpart B. Roseburg Forest Products Company is entitled to assert a business confidentiality claim covering any partofthe submitted infonnation. Attachment B specified the assertion and substantiation requirements f()r business confidentiality claims. Failure to assert such aclaim makes the submitted information subjectto public disclosure upon request and without further notice to you. pursuant to the Freedom oflnfonnation Act. 5 U.S.c. Section 552. Information**su~ject** to a business confidentiality claim may only be made available to the public in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Part 2. Subpart B. Aknowing submittal offalse infonnation in response to this request may be actionable under Section I13(c)(2) ofthe CAi\. as well as 18U.S.C. 

### §§IOOI and 1341. Failure to comply**-2~**with the terms ofthis request may subject Roseburg Forest Products Company to enforcement action under Seetion 113 orthe CAlL 42 U.S.c. §7413. Also enclosed with this Request for Information is a Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness Aet (SBREFA) information sheet. The requirements ofthis letter are nol subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980. 44 U.S.c. *35(1l el seq. We appreciate your cooperation in this malter. Ifyou have any questions please call Vanessa flinkle ofmy starrat 303-312-6561.Sincerely.

\ 

## \

# \

. Lv"- 

# "r..-"'- 

# t- Stephen S. Tuber Assistant Regional Administrator Office ofPartnerships and Regulatory Assistance Enclosures

cc: John Bunyak. NPS Sandra Silva. USFWS Thomas Dzomba. USFS

,

- J

-