alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                  WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
           OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
              AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH RULE 13a-14(b)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

In  connection  with the Annual Report of  Commonwealth  Income & Growth Fund II
(the  "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending  December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the undersigned,  the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company respectively,  each hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant  to ss.  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  to such
officer's knowledge, that: (a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the year ended  December  31, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934;  and  (b)
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                       -------------------------------------
                                       George S. Springsteen
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       March 30, 2005


                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Kimberly A. Springsteen
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       March 30, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
<page>
				     EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Diversified
Futures Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Lee Horwitz, Chief
Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Lee Horwitz

Name:		Lee Horwitz
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 23, 2007
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**Section 302 Certification**

 

I, Lainie Goldstein, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.; and

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| May 23, 2017 | /s/ LAINIE GOLDSTEIN        |
|-------------------|-----------------------------|
|              | Lainie Goldstein            |
| * *          | *Chief   Financial Officer* |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 132 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 132

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 18, 1993.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider further in the House the bill (H.R. 1335) making emergency supplemental 
appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for other 
purposes. All points of order against the bill are waived. It shall be in order 
to consider one amendment, if offered by the chairman of the Committee on 
Appropriations. The amendment shall be considered as read, shall be debatable 
for ten minutes equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, 
shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for 
division of the question. All points of order against the amendment are waived. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the amendment and on the 
bill to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit, 
if offered by Representative Michel of Illinois or his designee. A motion to 
recommit with instructions shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: ORDER AMENDING RULE 1959 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE : : : : : : : NO. 652 CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES DOCKET

**ORDER**
**PER CURIA M**  **AN D**  **NOW**, this 27th day of October, 201 6, upon the recommendation of the Domestic Relations Procedural Rules Committee ; the proposal having been submitted without publication pursuant to Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(a)(3): **IT IS**  **ORDERED** pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rule 1959 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure is amended in the attached form. This **ORDER** shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective in 60 days

.
Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined. Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-80007,333-21341,333-29517,33-56525 and 333-44087) on Form S-8 of ACT
Networks, Inc. of our report dated July 29, 1998 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of ACT Networks, Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1998.


                                                   ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Woodland Hills, California
September 25, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000751255
<NAME> DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1985-1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          86,724
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,182
<PP&E>                                      20,981,357
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,803,650
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 375,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,916
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     339,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   375,408
<SALES>                                        408,826
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               411,171
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  175,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                235,291
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            235,291
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   235,291
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 Date:  May 3, 2007
    /s/ Jeffrey S. GormanJeffrey S. GormanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) /s/ Robert E. KirkendallRobert E. KirkendallSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)  18
House Calendar No. 190

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 491

[Report No. 103–622]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2448)

and for other purposes.ucts and services, to increase testing for radon,to improve the accuracy of radon testing prodJULY 27, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 190

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 491

[Report No. 103–622]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2448) to improve the accuracy

of radon testing products and services, to increase testing for radon,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 1994

Mr. MOAKLEY, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution, which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2448) to improve the accuracy of radon testing products and services, to increase testing for radon, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of

3 rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 2448) to improve the accuracy of

6 radon testing products and services, to increase testing for
2

HRES 491 RH

1 radon, and for other purposes. The first reading of the

2 bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be con3 fined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally di4 vided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minor5 ity member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce.

6 After general debate the bill shall be considered for

7 amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order

8 to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amend9 ment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the na10 ture of a substitute recommended by the Committee on

11 Energy and Commerce now printed in the bill. Each sec12 tion of the committee amendment in the nature of a sub13 stitute shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of

14 consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee

15 shall rise and report the bill to the House with such

16 amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may

17 demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

18 adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to

19 the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute.

20 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on

21 the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without

22 intervening motion except one motion to recommit with

23 or without instructions.
#### Arthur G. RANDALL and Ruth I. Randall, his wife, Appellants, v. CLEARWATER BEACH BANK, Appellee.

No. 71-234.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 19, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
Henrik Weber

observe productions

1003 Hazel Court

Chesapeake, VA 23325

Dear Federal Aviation Administration, 

Thank you for your letter from August 27, 2015, informing me about your need for 

additional information. Please see below the information you requested. Please don’t 

hesitate to get in touch if there’s anything else I can provide. You can reach me via 

815-212-9151.

Comment	Tracking	Number:	1jz-8jcx-b1e7

"How your request would benefit the public as a whole"

Over the last five years, I have frequently worked for non-profit organizations, one 

based locally and one internationally, helping them to fulfill their mission, creating 

awareness videos, by donating my skills and equipment. Granting me the necessary 

exemptions would benefit these and other non-profit organizations. 

Please grant me the exemptions so that I can continue to be of service to these nonprofit organizations, while complying with FAA regulations. 

"Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support

your petition"

For the past four years, I have been involved in UAV operations, assembling, 

maintaining and flying. Safety is always my highest priority. If there would be a 

situation that would compromise the safety and wellbeing of those around me, I 

would abort the flight. 

The UAV that I’m operating can be set to fly only within a given

distance and altitude, which protects people and structures because it automatically

stays within my desired limits.
This invisible, GPS-enabled “geofence” prevents me from accidentally flying into 

unwanted areas or obstacles; furthermore I ́m creating a safe flight by only flying line 

of sight.

If the Intelligent Flight Battery is running low, or the UAV loses the connection with 

the remote controller for any reason, the aircraft will automatically return to the 

takeoff point and land safely. Anytime during the “coming home” sequence I can 

abort the flight and take control manually to ensure everybody’s safety. 
The UAV automatically logs and remembers the details of every flight. Complete 

flight route, flight time, flight distance, flight location, and cached versions of any 

photos and videos taken during the flight are logged for future reference and 

maintenance records. At the same time, an advanced flight recorder constantly records 

data from all of my UAV’s internal mechanisms, which can be easily shared with the 

manufacturer if there is ever any questions or issue.

Furthermore the UAV is equipped with a warning system that informs me about 

possible flight restrictions. Before every flight I inspect the area or potential 

restrictions or dangers, and I am conscious of the feedback that the UAV gives me 

throughout the flight. Please see below for additional manufacturer’s information 

about no-fly zones and the ability for the UAV to automatically stay grounded when 

in a no-fly zone.
H. Res. 416

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

May 5, 1994.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4296) to make unlawful the transfer or possession of assault weapons. The first reading of the bill shall be

dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of

the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the

bill and shall not exceed two hours equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on the Judiciary. After general debate the bill

shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in

the bill shall be considered as read. All points of order

against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. No amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute and no other amendment
2

HRES 416 EH

to the bill shall be in order. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendment as may have been

adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered

on the bill and any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with

or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    State or Jurisdiction    Type of
Subsidiary or Partnership                              of Incorporation     Interest        %Owned                 Owned By
-------------------------                           ---------------------   --------        ------                 --------
<S>                                                 <C>                     <C>`            <C>                    <C>
Chicago Miniature Optoelectronic                        Delaware               C             100%                  SLI, Inc.
    Technologies, Inc. ("CMOT")
Chicago Miniature Lamp (Canada) Inc.                    Ontario                C             100                   CMOT
IDI Internacional S.A.                                  Costa Rica             C             100                   CMOT
Chicago Miniature Lamp - Sylvania                       Delaware               C             100                   SLI
    Lighting International, Inc. ("CML-SLI")
SLI Lighting Products, Inc. ("SLP")                     Delaware               C             100                   SLI
SLI Lighting Solutions, Inc.                            North Carolina         C             100                   SLI
SLI Lighting Company                                    Delaware               C             100                   SLP
CML Air, Inc.                                           New Hampshire          C             100                   SLI
Electro-Mag International, Inc.                         Delaware               C             100                   SLI
Alba Speziallampen Holding GmbH                         Germany                LLC           100                   SLI
Chicago Miniature Lamp - Sylvania I                     The Netherlands        C             100                   CML-SLI
    B.V. ("BVI")
Chicago Miniature Lamp - Sylvania II                    The Netherlands        C             100                   BVI
    B.V. ("BVII")
Sylvania Lighting International B.V.                    The Netherlands        C             100                   BVII
    ("SLI-BV")
Flowil International (Holding) B.V.                     The Netherlands        C             100                   SLI-BV
Badalex Limited                                         United Kingdom         C             100                   BVII
</TABLE>

*C=Corporation, LLC=Limited Liability Company, LP=Limited Partnership Interest,
GP=General Partnership Interest
#### Stacy J. LEA, Appellant, v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a railroad corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-312.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 14, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 4, 1970.

Green & Hastings, Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for appellant.

Dixon, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In an action filed in the circuit court of Dade County, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., the appellant sought damages for personal injuries against the appellee railroad company. The action presented claims for four separate injuries, alleged to have been suffered by the appellant on August 14 and 15, November 15 and November 30 of 1964. Upon trial a directed verdict was entered in favor of the defendant railroad company. Judgment was entered thereon, and the plaintiff appealed.

On consideration of the record and briefs we find no error in the action of the trial court in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant railroad company on the claims for injuries of August 14 and 15 and November 15 of 1964, and affirm the judgment to that extent.

*866Regarding the injury claimed to have occurred on November 30, 1964, while plaintiff was attempting to board a flat car of a train in motion, we hold that the evidence was. sufficient to submit to the jury the question of whether employer negligence played a part in producing appellant’s injury of November 30, 1964, directly or by aggravation, under the tests therefor as outlined in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U.S. 500, 77 S.Ct. 443, 1 L.Ed.2d 493. See also, Conner v. Butler, 361 U.S. 29, 80 S.Ct. 21, 4 L.Ed.2d 10; reversing Conner v. Butler, Fla.App. 1959, 109 So.2d 183.

The judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the cause is remanded to the circuit court for a new trial on the issues raised with relation to the injury alleged to have occurred on November 30, 1964.

It is so ordered.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CECELIA ANYIKA

- FRANCIS,

Respondent

v.

YUSUFU ANYIKA,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 50 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of May, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40305

Summary Calendar

 

CHARLES MELVIN JACKSON, JR., 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH MITCHELL, Etc.; ET AL., Defendants,

JOSEPH MITCHELL, Dentist, 

Coffield Unit, 

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:01-CV-159

--------------------

December 10, 2002

Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dr. Joseph Mitchell appeals the district court’s denial of

summary judgment based on qualified immunity. An order denying

qualified immunity is immediately appealable if based on

conclusions of law rather than the presence of a genuine issue of 

material fact. See Palmer v. Johnson, 193 F.3d 346, 350 (5th

Cir. 1999). However, “if the district court concludes that the
No. 02-40305

-2-

summary judgment record raises a genuine issue of material fact

with respect to whether the defense of qualified immunity is

applicable, then that decision is not immediately appealable.” 

Id. at 351. 

 We conclude, as did the magistrate judge, that there are

genuine issues of material fact as to the existence of a serious

dental need that preclude the grant of summary judgment on the

basis of qualified immunity. Consequently, this court does not

have jurisdiction over Dr. Mitchell’s interlocutory appeal. See

Palmer, 193 F.3d at 351. 

We decline to exercise our pendent appellate jurisdiction

over the magistrate judge’s denial of Dr. Mitchell’s statute-oflimitations defense because it is not “inextricably intertwined”

with the denial of qualified immunity. See Thornton v. General

Motors Corp., 136 F.3d 450, 454 (5th Cir. 1998). 

APPEAL DISMISSED.