alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered January 9, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 008 45

- CR

CARLOS NAVAR R O

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F1 1

- 5 9312

- X



### O RDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant

has been deprived of the clerk’s and reporter’s records because of ineffective counsel, indigence,

or for any other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the clerk’s and reporter’s records. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment
of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for th e delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can

be filed.

 The trial court shall next determine the date by which the clerk’s record will be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written

findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY

DAYS of the date of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be

reinstated th irty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received,

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 77 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 77

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
investigations and studies by the Committee on Natural Resources in the 
            first session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1993

Mr. Miller of California submitted the following resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
investigations and studies by the Committee on Natural Resources in the 
            first session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

    Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and studies by 
the Committee on Natural Resources (hereinafter in this resolution 
referred to as the ``Committee''), including expenses for--
            (1) procurement of consultant services under section 202(i) 
        of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946; and
            (2) provision of assistance for members of professional 
        staff in obtaining specialized training under section 202(j) of 
        such Act;
there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House not more 
than $2,268,318.
    (b) Not more than $2,500 of the amount specified in subsection (a) 
may be used for consultant services referred to in paragraph (1) of 
such subsection and not more than $4,378 of such amount may be used for 
specialized training referred to in paragraph (2) of such subsection.
    Sec. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers 
authorized by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, 
and approved by the Committee on House Administration.
    Sec. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolution for 
investigations and studies carried out during the period beginning at 
noon on January 3, 1993, and ending immediately before noon on January 
3, 1994.
    Sec. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution shall be 
expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on 
House Administration.

                                 <all>
```
#### SOLOMON BOSTON, d. b., *vs.*SARAH TENNANT, p. b.

The justice’s record should state that the cause was heard on the *■proofs*and allegations of the plaintiff, but if the record shows that it was so it will be sufficient.

Certiorari to Justice Wilson.

The record showed that this action was on a book account, a copy of which, as well as of the defendant’s account against plaintiff, was sent up. The defendant not appearing, the justice gave judgment against him by default. He afterwards appeared and claimed a new trial by referees, which was granted, and the trial had. The record slated that the referees “ appear, are sworn respectively, and proceed to the investigation of parties’ accounts, &c., and report in favor of plaintiff, for the sum of $45 91.” Judgment rendered on the report for 045 91 debt and $2 50 costs.

The exception was, that the record did not show that the referees heard the cause upon the *proofs,*as well as upon the allegations of the parties; but the court said that this was sufficient.

*Ridgely,*for plaintiff in error.

Wootten, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             240
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1126
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       1256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2967
<PP&E>                                            4674
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    8216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3089
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                        2624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      8216
<SALES>                                           9808
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  9808
<CGS>                                             5959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    23
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (814)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (5)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (547)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    236
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1045
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.71)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                          361800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3032400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4068800
<PP&E>                                        12330900
<DEPRECIATION>                                  977400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                16392000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2942700
<BONDS>                                         152600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           261400
<PREFERRED>                                    8454200
<COMMON>                                          6300
<OTHER-SE>                                   (4178400)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  16392000
<SALES>                                        8368200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8368200
<CGS>                                          4755700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6920900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              490000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 332500
<INCOME-TAX>                                    319000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             332500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    300600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
November 29, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

PETER HENERY, Appellant

NO. 14-09-00996-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard ON REMAND from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals 

on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this 

Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment 

AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision be certified below for observance.
# C_2008052EN.01S00301.xml

| 26.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 26 February 2008, in Official Journal of the European Union C 52 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Third supplement to the 26th complete edition’ and the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — First supplement to the 26th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see: http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32106-32107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL18-182-000]


ISO New England Inc.; Notice of Institution of Section 206 
Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On July 2, 2018, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. EL18-
182-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 
U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into whether ISO New 
England Inc.'s Transmission, Markets and Services Tariff is unjust and 
unreasonable. ISO New England Inc., 164 FERC ] 61,003 (2018).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL18-182-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.
    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL18-182-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR

[[Page 32107]]

385.214, within 21 days of the date of issuance of the order.

    Dated: July 2, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14773 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
|EXHIBIT 31.2                   
|-------------------------------
|                               
|CERTIFICATION                  
|                               
|I, Danny W. Huff, certify that:
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               



---

|                       |                                                                                                                                        | b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |                                                                                                                                        |                                                                                                                                                                              
|                       |                                                                                                                                        |                                                                                                                                                                              
|                       |                                                                                                                                        |                                                                                                                                                                              
|Date: October 28, 2004
|                       |                                                                                                                                        |                                                                                                                                                                              
|                       | /s/ DANNY W. HUFF                                    
Danny W. Huff
Executive Vice President - Finance
    and Chief Financial Officer
#### LANDIS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. HEALTH EDUCATION AUTHORITY of Louisiana.

No. 8757.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

May 10, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1978.

Joseph E. Friend, Dodge, Friend, Wilson & Spedale, New Orleans, for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

George G. Kiefer, Kiefer, Glorioso & Fleming, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

John A. Stewart, Jr., New Orleans, for Associated General Contractors of La., Inc., amicus curiae.

Before REDMANN, LEMMON and GU-LOTTA, JJ.

REDMANN, Judge.

A construction contract between a business corporation and a governmental agency contained a stipulation for arbitration of disputes. Neither the corporation’s nor the public agency’s resolution authorizing the contract included express authority to stipulate for arbitration. On this appeal from a judgment ordering the public agency to arbitrate, we hold that the contractual stipulation for arbitration was not authorized by either party to the contract and is therefore unenforceable.

“[T]he power [of attorney] must be express . . . [to] refer a matter to arbi*1046tration.” La.C.C. 2997. Even the power to compromise “does not include that of submitting or referring to arbitrators.” C.C. 2998.

The trial judge reasoned that apparent authority or ratification (by having arbitrated an earlier dispute) should bind both parties. We disagree. The Civil Code does not permit implied authority to bind to arbitration. Neither pre-contract actions nor a post-contract submission of one dispute constitutes “express” authority to manda-taries to bind either the corporation or the public agency to future arbitration of disputes.

Reversed at plaintiff’s cost.

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Amicus curiae shares plaintiff’s misapprehension of the facts. No resolution by either plaintiff or defendant authorized signing of *this*contract, or of any “contract as a whole”, or even of a “contract in the A.I.A. form” (which contains an arbitration clause “as boilerplate”).

A resolution authorizing a corporate officer to sign some specific entire contract, either described in or attached to the resolution, would constitute authorization by the corporation for the delegated signer to bind the corporation to every clause of that contract. But a *general*authority by resolution to “sign contracts” or the like does not constitute the necessary *special*authority to the signer to bind the corporation to arbitrate. Much less does a resolution (like defendant’s here) which specifies many provisions to be contained in the contract but is silent on arbitration.

Rehearing is refused.
#### NOBLE T. JERMAN *vs.*DANIEL HUDSON.

If an instrumentary witness cannot be found, proof of his hand-writing will be suflicient.

On a return of non est inventus to an attachment against a witness, the party will be let into other proof.

Where the witness cannot be had, proof of *Ms*hand-writing and not that of the party, is the proper proof of the instrument.

Case. Narr., special count, and the common money counts. Plea, general issue.

The action was by assignee against assignor of a judgment. Daniel Hudson recovered a judgment against one Cathel, and assigned it under his hand and seal and before two witnesses *(Digest*42,) to James A. Hudson, who in like manner assigned to plaintiff. Jerman executed the judgment against Cathel, but got nothing. The sheriff returned *“*nulla bona.” And thereupon, he brought suit against the first assignor.

The attesting witnesses to the assignments were summoned, but did not appear. An attachment was prayed and issued against them which was returned “ not found.”

The plaintiff then asked to be permitted to make other proof of the *135assignments, and proposed to prove the hand-writing of Daniel Hudson, the assignor.

*Brinckloe,*for plaintiff.

*Robinson,*for defendant.

*The Court*

admitted him to make other proof, but required that proof to apply to the hand-writing of the subscribing witnesses; which the plaintiff being unable to make, he suffered a

Nonsuit.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 10, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31975-31976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLWY920000. L51040000.FI0000. 18XL5017AR]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
WYW178348, Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As provided for under the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as 
amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for 
reinstatement of competitive oil and gas lease WYW178348 from Wold 
Energy Partners LLC, Samson Resources Company, and GasCo LP for land in 
Converse County, Wyoming. The lessees filed the petition on time, along 
with all rentals due since the lease terminated under the law. No 
leases affecting this land were issued before the petition was filed. 
The BLM proposes to reinstate the lease.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erik Norelius, Acting Branch Chief for 
Fluid Minerals Adjudication, Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming State 
Office, 5353 Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming, 82003; 
phone 307-775-6176; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#690c07061b0c05001c290b0504470e061f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eb8e8584998e87829eab898786c58c849d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf may call 
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact Mr. 
Norelius during normal business hours. The FRS is available 24 hours a 
day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above 
individual. A reply will be sent during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee agreed to the amended lease terms 
for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre, or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16 \2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and the $159 cost of 
publishing this notice. The lessee met the requirements for 
reinstatement of the lease per Sec. 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral 
Leasing Act

[[Page 31976]]

of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). The BLM proposes to reinstate the lease 
effective December 1, 2015 under the original terms and conditions of 
the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.

    Authority: 30 U.S.C. 188(e)(4) and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(b)(2)(v).

Erik Norelius,
Acting Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 2018-14727 Filed 7-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D.G .
Agreements Adopte d b yth e Traffi c Conference s of th e Internationa l Ai r Transpor t Associatio n 

## OST-2010 - OZ6 3

APPLICATIO N FO R APPROVA L O F AGREEMENT S

B Y TH E INTERNATIONA L AI R TRANSPORT ASSOCIATIO N lAT A AGREEMEN T APPROVE D & IMMUNIZE D DOCKET OST - / ^ - 0 ^.^ 3 ACTIO; - DAT E VC n ' if , 1<^/C ^ Thi s approval an dgran t

o f antitrus t immunity i s subject , wher e applicable , to condition s previousl y imposed . Thi s actio n i s effectiv e after 7 day s unles s apetitio n i s file dunde r 1 4 CF R385.3 0 o r

arevie w i s undertake n o n th e Department' s ow n motion . I n view o f th e agreement' s noncontroversia l natur e an dth e availability o f th e abov e pHJ^dure , th e 21-da y TCriodiai4 CF R303.4 2 i s waived .

irector , OfFicewf

tntemationa l Aviatio n 

### 8 Octobe r201 0 Comnnunication s wit h respec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t t o Douglas E . Lavi n Regiona l Vic e Presiden t - Nort h Americ a Intemationa l Ai rTranspor t Associatio n 177 6 KSt . N.W . #12'^

Floo r Washingto n D C 2000 6