alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION

I, Tami J Story, Acting Chief Financial Officer of Earth Search Sciences, Inc.,
certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Earth Search
Sciences, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

          (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: August 10, 2005                   /s/ Tami J Story
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Tami J Story
                                        Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT July Term 2014

PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., d/b/a PUBLIX SUPER MARKET
,

Petitioner

,

v.

SYLVIA JOHN
, Respondent

.

No. 4D 14

- 1892

[ November 19, 2014 ]

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Dwight L. Geiger , Judge; L.T. Case No. 562013CA000421

.

Katherine E. Giddings and Kristen M. Fiore of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Kathryn D. Anderson of Reich & Mancini, P.A., Port St. Lucie, fo r respondent.

P ER C URIAM

.

We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the April 24, 2014 order granting respondent’s motion to compel production. On remand,

the circuit court shall conduct an in camera review to determine whether the October 11, 2009 incident report is protected by the work product privilege. If the court determines that the document is so protected, it shall not order production unless respondent makes a “showing that [respondent] has need of the materials in the preparation of the case and is unable without undue hardship to obtain the substantial equivalent of the materials by other means.” Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(b)( 4 ); see also Publix Super M

kts. , Inc. v. Anderson , 92 So. 3d 922 , 92 3 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2012); Lloyd’s Underwriters at London v. El

- Ad Villagio Cond

. Ass ’n , 976 So. 2d

28 , 28 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2008).

S TEVENSON

, G ROSS and G ERBER
, JJ., concur.- 2

- * * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jimmy TONEY.

No. 60606.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 3, 1978.

J. Daniel Rivette and Rena M. Price, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Patrick Fanning, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  (1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-65096) pertaining to the Virco Mfg. Corporation 1993 Stock Incentive Plan,(2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-32539) pertaining to the Virco Mfg. Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan,(3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-51717) pertaining to the Virco Mfg. Corporation Employee Stock Ownership
Plan,(4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-74832) pertaining to the Virco Mfg. Corporation 401(K) Savings Plan, and(5)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-143874) pertaining to the Virco Mfg. Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan;
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 523 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 216
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 523

                          [Report No. 103-709]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 4603) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, 
 Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies programs for 
  the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and making supplemental 
 appropriations for these departments and agencies for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 17, 1994

  Mr. Beilenson, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 4603) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, 
 Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies programs for 
  the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and making supplemental 
 appropriations for these departments and agencies for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
4603) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, 
and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies programs for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 1995, and making supplemental appropriations 
for these departments and agencies for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 1994, and for other purposes. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived. The 
conference report shall be considered as read.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 216

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 523

                          [Report No. 103-709]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 4603) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, 
 Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies programs for 
  the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and making supplemental 
 appropriations for these departments and agencies for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            August 17, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Whitemark Homes, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: August 19, 2003             By:  /s/ KENNETH WHITE
                                  Kenneth White
                                  Chief Executive Officer

                                  By:  /s/ MITCHELL R. GORDON
                                  Mitchell R. Gordon
                                  Chief Financial Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Whitemark Homes,
Inc. and will be retained by Whitemark Homes, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.1  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-148442, and No. 333-149753 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement No. 333-49837, No. 333-44436, No. 333-101962, and No. 333-153079 on Form S-8 of our reports dated June 8, 2010, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc., and the effectiveness of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. for the year ended March 26, 2010.  /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP  San Jose, California June 8, 2010
#### Clarence MACKEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-120.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 12, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Gerald D. LOVELACE, Appellant, v. Ana Maria SOBRINO, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1376.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 24, 1973.

Knight, Peters, Hoeveler, Pickle, Nie-moeller & Flynn, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellant.

Spence, Payne & Masington, Miami, Richard E. Hardwick, Coral Gables, Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-defendant, a third party plaintiff below, seeks review of an adverse summary judgment entered in favor of the alleged insurer on the basis of coverage by the company of the appellant in a personal injury “dog bite” case. We reverse.

We have carefully considered the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and have concluded that the trial court erroneously entered summary final judgment in favor of appellee without a hearing on the motions and prior to the completion of scheduled discovery proceedings that were relevant to the issues involved. Accordingly, the order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee and denying *515same to appellant1 are hereby reversed and the cause is remanded for a hearing on said motions based upon the record now before this court, and any other matters that are properly presented to the court prior to said hearing.

Appellant’s petition for attorney’s fees on this appeal is denied without prejudice to his right to apply to the trial court in the event that appellant prevails below on the issue of coverage. See Daleo v. Bert & Bette Bayfront 66 Marine, Fla.App.1973, 273 So.2d 113.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

1

. While it appears that both parties moved for summary judgment that fact does not bind the lower court to render same where the prerequisites for summary judgment are not met. See, Osceola County v. Goodman, Fla.App.1973, 276 So.2d 210.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 522 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 215
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 522

                          [Report No. 103-707]

    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
 consideration of a certain resolution reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 16, 1994

   Mr. Derrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
 consideration of a certain resolution reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI for a two-
thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to a 
resolution reported on or before the legislative day of August 19, 
1994, providing for consideration or disposition of the conference 
report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3355) to amend the Omnibus Crime 
Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to allow grants to increase police 
presence, to expand and improve cooperative efforts between law 
enforcement agencies and members of the community to address crime and 
disorder problems, and otherwise to enhance public safety.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 215

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 522

                          [Report No. 103-707]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
 consideration of a certain resolution reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            August 16, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
No. 11097.

#### The Hocking Valley Railway Co. *v.*Klunk.

Decided February 16, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Marion county.

*Mr. C. O. Hunter,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Pugh & Pugh*and *Mr. F. S. Monnett,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear and Price, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Docket ID: DOD-2018-OS-0042]

# AGENCY:

Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability (NOA).

# SUMMARY:

DLA announces the availability of an Environmental Assessment (EA) documenting the potential environmental effects associated with the proposed action to upgrade the main gate access control point at Defense Distribution Depot, San Joaquin, California, and surrounding area.

# DATES:

The public comment period will end on August 13, 2018.

# ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments, identified by DOD-2018-OS-0042, to one of the following:

*Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.*                         Follow the instructions for submitting comments.                    

*Mail:*                         Department of Defense, Office of the Deputy Chief Management Officer, Directorate for Oversight and Compliance, Regulatory and Advisory Committee Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Mailbox #24, Suite 08D09, Alexandria, VA 22350-1700.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ira Silverberg at 571-767-0705 during normal business hours Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (EDT) or by email:                         *ira.silverberg@dla.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The EA has been prepared as required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and DLA Regulation 1000.22, Environmental Considerations in Defense Logistics Agency Actions.

The EA posted to the docket provides additional information about the proposed action.

The EA is available in hardcopy at the Tracy Branch Library, 20 East Eaton Avenue, Tracy, CA 95376.

Dated: July 9, 2018.

Shelly E. Finke,

Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2018-14927 Filed 7-11-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
No. 10678.

#### The Jung Brewing Co. *v.*Schmidt.

Decided December 15, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Messrs. Harmon, Colston, Goldsmith & Hoadley*and *Mr. Oscar Stoehr,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Renner & Renner; Mr. Eugene JJeim*and *Mr. Gustave R. W erner,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.-

Price, C. J., Shauck, Summers, Spear and ÜAVisj JJ., concur.
# C_2022451EN.01000601.xml

| 28.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 451/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 451/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — flightright GmbH v American Airlines Inc.

(Case C-436/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 3(1)(a) - Scope - Article 2(f) to (h) - Concept of ‘ticket’ - Concept of ‘reservation’ - Concept of ‘connecting flight’ - Reservation through a travel agency - Article 7 - Compensation for air passengers in the event of a long delay to a flight - Transport operation consisting of a number of flights operated by separate operating air carriers - Connecting flight departing from an airport located in a Member State with a stop in Switzerland and final destination in a third country)

(2022/C 451/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: flightright GmbH

Defendant: American Airlines Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(h) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91

must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of a ‘connecting flight’ covers a transport operation made up of a number of flights operated by separate operating air carriers which do not have a specific legal relationship, where those flights have been combined by a travel agency which has charged an overall price and issued a single ticket for that operation, with the result that a passenger departing from an airport located in the territory of a Member State who suffers a long delay to the arrival at the destination of the last flight may rely on the right to compensation pursuant to Article 7 of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 452, 8.12.2021.

---
# C_2022011EN.01001302.xml

| 10.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 26 July 2021 — The Navigator Company, S.A., Navigator Pulp Figueira, S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-459/21)

(2022/C 11/18)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: The Navigator Company, S.A., Navigator Pulp Figueira, S.A.

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Question referred

Does the principle of equivalence preclude national VAT legislation, such as that laid down in Article 21(1) of the Código do Imposto sobre o Valor Acrescentado (Value Added Tax Code) (CIVA), maintained under the standstill clause, which excludes entirely, or in the proportion of 50 % of input VAT, the right to deduct VAT on motor vehicle expenses, travel and accommodation expenses and entertainment expenses, these being, in the context of corporation tax, fully deductible as expenses (without prejudice to ex post verification and subject to certain conditions), or, in the context of autonomous taxation, effectively deductible in a proportion greater than 50 %?

---