alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023155EN.01002102.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/21

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 March 2023 — Gerardo Galeote (C-715/21 P), Graham Watson (C-716/21 P) v European Parliament

(Joined Cases C-715/21 P and C-716/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Law governing the institutions - Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament - Amendment of the additional voluntary pension scheme - Individual decision fixing additional voluntary pension rights - Plea of illegality - Competence of the Bureau of the Parliament - Rights acquired or in the process of being acquired - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Legal certainty)

(2023/C 155/25)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: Gerardo Galeote (C-715/21 P), Graham Watson (C-716/21 P) (represented by: E. Arnaldos Orts, abogado, F. Doumont, avocat, J. Martínez Gimeno and D. Sarmiento Ramírez-Escudero, abogados)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker, N. Görlitz and T. Lazian, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeals; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeals;

| 2. | Orders Mr Gerardo Galeote and Mr Graham Watson to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Gerardo Galeote and Mr Graham Watson to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 37, 24.1.2022.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF DATASTREAM SYSTEMS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Datastream
Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned C. Alex Estevez, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ C. ALEX ESTEVEZC. Alex EstevezChief Financial OfficerDatastream Systems, Inc.March 9, 2004
#### Jimmy Ross FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1062.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


           (Not filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Patricia R. Elledge, the
Chief Financial Officer of TMBR/Sharp Drilling, Inc. ("TMBR"), hereby certifies
that the Annual Report on Form 10K of TMBR for the year ended March 31, 2003
fully complies with the periodic reporting requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in that Form 10K
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of TMBR.

Dated: June 26, 2003



                                   /s/ Patricia R. Elledge
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Patricia R. Elledge, Chief Financial Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to TMBR/Sharp Drilling, Inc. and will be retained by TMBR/Sharp
Drilling, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
H. Res. 581

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

October 7, 1994.

Resolved, That any organizational caucus or conference

in the House of Representatives for the One Hundred Fourth

Congress may begin on or after November 27, 1994.

SEC. 2. As used in this resolution, the term ‘‘organizational caucus or conference’’ means a party caucus or conference authorized to be called under section 202(a) of House

Resolution 988, Ninety-third Congress, agreed to on October

8, 1974, and enacted into permanent law by chapter III of

title I of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1975 (2

U.S.C. 29a(a)).

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 21


LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT (1):

Subsidiary

ACME Chaston Puerto Rico, Inc.

American Safety Razor Corporation

American Safety Razor of Canada Limited

ASR Holdings, Inc.

Bond Blades International, Ltd.

The Hewitt Soap Company, Inc.

Industrias Manufactureras ASR de Puerto Rico, Inc.

Megas Beauty Care, Inc.

Personna International de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

Personna International Limited

Personna International UK Limited

Personna International (Deutschland) GmbH

Personna International de Puerto Rico, Inc.

Valley Park Realty, Inc.




(1) Each subsidiary is 100% owned by the Company or certain of its subsidiaries.



<PAGE>
#### David Wayne CLAVILLE v. STATE.

No. 37703.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 1969.

Appeals dismissed without opinion.
Exhibit  32
                              THE GILLETTE COMPANY
                                 Certification
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                              United States Code)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of the
undersigned  officers  of The  Gillette  Company,  a Delaware  corporation  (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Form
10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and  information  contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



Date:  August 5, 2003                   /s/ James M. Kilts
                                        ------------------------------
                                        James M. Kilts
                                        Chairman of the Board
                                        and Chief Executive Officer


Date:  August 5, 2003                   /s/ Charles W. Cramb
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Charles W. Cramb
                                        Senior Vice President
                                        and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Gillette Company and will be retained by The Gillette Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the first quarter ended August 29, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark W. McCutcheon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   October 9, 2008



/s/ Mark W. McCutcheon
----------------------
Mark W. McCutcheon
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon
request.


                                      107
#### Marion Margaret LUCCIOLA and Dorothy J. Collins, Petitioners, v. Ursula G. COOPER and Elva W. Minshall, Respondents.

No. 42912.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 17, 1972.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-51057

Summary Calendar

JUSTO GONZALEZ, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY; TOGO D. WEST, JR.,

Secretary of the Army,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(EP-96-CV-466-F)

August 13, 1998

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

J usto Gonzalez, Jr. (Gonzalez) filed suit in federal court

against appellees, U.S. Department of the Army and Togo D. West,

Jr., Secretary of the Army (the Army), asserting that the Army

refused to promote him to Garrison Manager at Fort Bliss because of

sex and national origin discrimination. Gonzalez also alleged the

Army retalia ted against him because he filed an EEO complaint

challenging the Army’s discriminatory failure to promote. Gonzalez2

moved for partial summary judgment on his discrimination claim on

October 10, 1997. The Army moved for summary judgment on

Gonzalez’s dis crimination and retaliation claims on October 14,

1997. The district court denied Gonzalez’s motion for partial

summary judgment and granted the Army’s motion for summary judgment

on both of Gonzalez’s asserted causes of action on November 14,

1997. Gonzalez timely appealed.

We have carefully reviewed the brie fs, the reply brief, the

record excerpt and relevant portions of the record itself. For the

reasons stated by the district court in its 31-page Order signed

under date of November 10, 1997 a nd filed under date of November

14, 1997, we AFFIRM the Final Judgment of the district court signed

under date of November 12, 1997 and filed under date of November

14, 1997.

AFFIRMED

.
#### The STATE, use of MEDFORD, *vs.*SPENCE, REDDEN and HOUSTON.

Hand-writing may be proved by a person who never saw the party write, if he have otherwise a knowledge of the character of his hand-writing.

Debt on a constable’s bond.

At the trial a witness was called to prove the hand-writing of the subscribing witness to the bond. He had never seen the party write, but *he*had seen a long account acknowledged by him to be his handwriting ; and from this he offered to swear to his belief of the signa» *349ture. The testimony was objected, to and admitted by the court. (See *2 Stark. Ev.*373, &c.)

*Brinckloe,*for plaintiff.

*Robinson,*for defendant.
#### PALO VERDE IRRIGATION DISTRICT v. James H. JORDAN et al.

No. 8427.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 15, 1937.

Stewart, Shaw & Murphey, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

A. Heber Winder, of Riverside, Cal., and W. Coburn Cook, of Turlock, Cal., for appellees.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of motion of appellees, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeal in above cause dismissed for failure of appellant to file record and docket cause; mandate to issue as provided in rule 32.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF GOLDEN TRIANGLE ROYALTY & OIL, INC. FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           33427
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   884798
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       3152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                973228
<PP&E>                                         5313144
<DEPRECIATION>                                (954929)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5831021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           161460
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          3833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     5655165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5831021
<SALES>                                        1966776
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1967867
<CGS>                                           324586
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1643281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                821559
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 852160
<INCOME-TAX>                                    204231
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             647929
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    647929
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
#### Carlos G. HEGEL, Appellant, v. Ann P. HEGEL, Appellee.

No. 72-1413.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 17, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 7, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 12-3722

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v. Demetrius McCalister, also known as M eechie, also known as Lil'D, also known as Meechie Loc lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________ Submitted: June 7, 2013 Filed: June 7, 2013 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Demetrius McCalister directly appeal s the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pled guilty to charges involving drugs and firearms. His counsel has moved to withdraw and ha s filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), acknowledging that McCalister entered into a plea agreement containing an appeal waiver, but arguing that the district c ourt, having granted a downward variance, abused its discretion by not imposing a more lenient sentence. Upon careful review, this court concludes that the appeal waiv er is enforceable. See United States v. Jennings , 662 F.3d 988, 990 (8th Cir. 2011) (court should enforce appeal waiver if both waiver and plea ag reement were entered into knowingly and voluntarily, appeal is within waiver’s sc ope, and no miscarriage of justice would result); see also United States v. Azure , 571 F.3d 769, 772 (8th Cir. 2009) (de novo review of whether defendant waived right to appeal sent ence). Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), this court finds no nonfrivolous issues outside the scope of the appeal waiver. The appeal is dismissed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2-
EXHIBIT 32.1


                 CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL H. MCILVAIN, PRESIDENT
         AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


The undersigned officer of Golden Chief Resources, Inc. hereby certifies that
(a) Golden Chief's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (b information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Golden Chief.


Date: March 17, 2006                             /s/ MICHAEL H. MCILVAIN
                                                 -------------------------
                                                 Michael H. McIlvain
                                                 President and Chief
                                                 Financial Officer,
                                                 Golden Chief Resources, Inc




A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Golden Chief
Resources, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Chief Resources, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Michael LaPLANTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-219.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Marion D. WRAY, Appellant, v. Vincent M. WRAY, Appellee.

No. 70-70.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 12, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Knott, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Levin FUSILIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Atney FOURNERAT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 6446.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

May 24, 1978.

Devillier, Ardoin & Morrow, Anthony J. Fazzio and David Cook, Eunice, for plaintiff-appellant.

Guillory, McGee & Mayeux, A. Frank McGee, Eunice, for defendant-appellee.

Before WATSON, GUIDRY and CUT-RER, JJ.

WATSON, Judge.

Plaintiff, Levin Fusilier, filed this suit October 14,1975, to claim a right of passage across the land of defendant, Atney Fournerat. Plaintiff alleged that his property in Acadia Parish, Louisiana constituted an enclosed estate as defined in LSA-C.C. art. 699.

The evidence supports the trial court’s factual conclusion that plaintiff’s property is not an enclosed estate, because a public road on the East designated as “E” is accessible to him and makes it unnecessary for him to use public road “A” lying across defendant’s property to the West.

*1061According to the testimony of a police juror, J. D. Sittig, Sr., road “E” has been continuously maintained by the police jury for nine years as a gravel road, which is used for a school bus route. Road “E” leads to the property of plaintiff’s brother, Jacques Fusilier, with whom he entered into a partition January 3, 1953. The adjoining property on the West is adjacent to defendant’s and was acquired by plaintiff from defendant’s ancestor in title after the partition. However, both this property and that partitioned are accessible from road “E”. Prior to the partition the Fusiliers owned an undivided interest in the property served by road “E” and plaintiff retained a right of passage across his brother’s property after the partition under the provisions of LSA-C.C. art. 701. Plaintiff in deposition admitted the existence of wagon or sawmill roads affording ample passage between his property and that of his brother. Plaintiff in direct testimony admitted using road “E” for access to his property prior to the partition. The only obstacle to plaintiff’s present use of this road is a canal which he himself constructed. Plaintiff’s brother has never denied him a right-of-way across the property and in fact granted him a right-of-way for the canal. The bulldozer which was used to construct the canal was brought in from road “E”.

Thus plaintiff’s property is not an enclosed estate and he is not entitled to a right of passage across defendant’s land.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the trial court herein is affirmed at the cost of plaintiff-appellant, Levin Fusilier.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the first quarter ended August 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mark W. McCutcheon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: August 26, 2004



/s/ Mark W. McCutcheon
----------------------
Mark W. McCutcheon
President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




                                       21
Order entered November 23, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-15-01376-CV

IN RE BRET DAVID FOREMAN

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-51023-2014



### ORDER Before Justices Franci s, Myers, and Schenck

Based on the Court’s opini on of this date, we DENY relator Bret David Foreman’s

petition for writ of habeas corpus. We GRANT the motion for withdrawal of counsel filed by

relator’s attorney, Vale Krenik. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE