alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
10.59




Third
Amendment
 To
 Change
of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement
 
 This
Third Amendment (the
“Third Amendment”) to Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreementis made this 10h day
of December, 2009, by and between ImageWare Systems, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on the one hand, and David Harding, Vice President
of Engineering and Chief Technical Officer, on the other hand (the “Executive”).
 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the
Executive entered into a Change of Control and Severance Benefits Agreement
dated as of May 21, 2007 which was then  subsequently amended on
September 27, 2008and again on
April 6, 2009  (the “Severance Agreement”); and
 
 WHEREAS, the Executive
continues to perform valuable services for the Company and the Company desires
to assure itself of the continuing services of Executive; and
 
 WHEREAS, in consideration of
the foregoing and in order to amend the terms of the Agreement and to provide
for the continued services of the Executive in accordance with the present
intent of the Company and the Executive.
 
 NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration,
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in further consideration of the
mutual covenants contained in the Severance Agreement, the parties do hereby
agree that the Severance Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
 
 Section“2.Term of
Agreement”strike the
language “continue until December 31, 2009” and replace it with “continue until
December 31, 2010”.
 
 
 
 
 _________________________________                                                             _________________________________
 
 ImageWare
Systems,
Inc.                                                                                       
     David Harding
EXHIBIT
10.51




Second
Amendment
 to
 Employment
Agreement
 
 This
Second Amendment to Employment
Agreement(the “Second Amendment”), is being entered into effective April
6, 2009 by and between ImageWare Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”) and Mr. Wayne Wetherell (the “Executive”).
 
 Whereas,
the Company and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of
September 27, 2005 and subsequently amended on September 27, 2008 (as amended,
the “Employment Agreement”);
 
 WHEREAS, the Executive
continues to perform valuable services for the Company and the Company desires
to assure itself of the continuing services of Executive; and
 
 WHEREAS, in consideration of
the foregoing and in order to amend the terms of the Agreement and to provide
for the continued services of the Executive in accordance with the present
intent of the Company and the Executive.
 
 NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration,
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in further consideration of the
mutual covenants contained in the Employment Agreement, the parties do hereby
agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
 
 1.           Section
9 of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with
the following:
 
 9.
              Code Section
      409A.  "In the event that any amount or benefit to be
      paid or provided to Executive under Section 5 of this Agreement
      would give rise to the imposition of any tax under Section 409A of
      the Code ("Section 409A"), the Company will not pay any such
      amounts or provide any such benefits during the six-month period
      following Executive's “separation of service (as defined in Section
      409A).  If any amount or benefit is not paid or provided to
      Executive as a result of the previous sentence, on the first day
      following the six-month period
      after the Executive's separation of service, the Company
      will pay pr provide Executive a lump-sum amount equal to the cumulative
      amounts that would have otherwise been paid to Executive during such
      six-month period but were not paid.  Thereafter, Executive will
      receive his remaining  amounts and benefits in accordance with
      this Agreement."
 
 2.
              Section“2.Term
      of Agreement”strike the
      language “continue until June 30, 2009” and replace it with “continue
      until December 31, 2009”.
 
  3.
              Except
      as expressly amended herein, the Employment Agreement shall continue and
      be in full force in all respects.
 
 
 
 
 _________________________________                                            _________________________________
 
 ImageWare
Systems,
Inc.                                                                           Wayne
Wetherell
No. 10692.

#### Mitchell, Auditor, *v.*The State, ex rel. Neal.

Decided February 9, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Knox county.

*Messrs. H. H. & R. M. Greer*and *Mr. Columbus Ezvalt,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. L. B. Houck; Mr. F. V. Owen*and *Mr. Robt. J.*King, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.5



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Miramar Mining Corporation (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony P. Walsh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



March 30, 2005

/s/ Anthony P. Walsh



Anthony P. Walsh

Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Miramar Mining Corporation and will be retained by Miramar Mining Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Nicholas Keating, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

June 13, 2006

/s/ C. NICHOLAS KEATING, JR.C. Nicholas Keating, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2021297EN.01001601.xml

| 26.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/16

---

Appeal brought on 1 April 2021 by Ryanair DAC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 17 February 2021 in Case T-238/20, Ryanair v Commission

(Case C-209/21 P)

(2021/C 297/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Ryanair DAC (represented by: E. Vahida and F. C. Laprévote, avocats, S. Rating, abogado, I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, dikigoros, and V. Blanc, avocate)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, French Republic, Kingdom of Sweden

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal;

| — | declare in accordance with Articles 263 and 264 TFEU that Commission Decision C(2020) 2366 final of 11 April 2020 on State Aid SA.56812 (2020/N) — Sweden — COVID-19: Loan guarantee scheme to airlines is void; and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare in accordance with Articles 263 and 264 TFEU that Commission Decision C(2020) 2366 final of 11 April 2020 on State Aid SA.56812 (2020/N) — Sweden — COVID-19: Loan guarantee scheme to airlines is void; and

| — | order the Commission to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Ryanair, and order the interveners at first instance and in this appeal (if any) to bear their own costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Ryanair, and order the interveners at first instance and in this appeal (if any) to bear their own costs;

alternatively:

| — | set aside the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment under appeal;

| — | refer back the case to the General Court for reconsideration; and |
| --- | --- |

—

refer back the case to the General Court for reconsideration; and

| — | reserve the costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

reserve the costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the appellant relies on five pleas in law.

First, the General Court infringed EU law in rejecting the appellant’s claim that the non-discrimination principle has been unjustifiably violated.

Second, the General Court made an error in law and distorted the facts regarding the appellant’s claim on free movement of services.

Third, the General Court made an error in law in rejecting the application of the balancing test.

Fourth, the General Court made an error in law and distorted the facts regarding the Commission’s failure to state reasons.

Fifth, the General Court made an error in law and distorted the facts regarding the Commission’s failure to open a formal investigation procedure.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.3841
<CASH>                                         113,761
<SECURITIES>                                       590
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,858
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     82,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               262,185
<PP&E>                                         555,575
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,394
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 810,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,872
<BONDS>                                        242,218
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       378,925
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   810,207
<SALES>                                         47,484
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,484
<CGS>                                           56,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,895)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,113)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,113)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2021035EN.01005301.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/53

---

Action brought on 16 November 2020 — Asian Gear v EUIPO — Multimox (Scooter)

(Case T-686/20)

(2021/C 35/70)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Asian Gear BV (Pijnacker, Netherlands) (represented by: B. Gravendeel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Multimox Holding BV (Rijen, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design No 607 155-0004

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 September 2020 in Case R 1043/2018-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul or vary the contested decision, so that Community design No 607 155-0004 is declared invalid; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul or vary the contested decision, so that Community design No 607 155-0004 is declared invalid;

| — | in the alternative, confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division of 30 April 2018 and annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division of 30 April 2018 and annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs to the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs to the applicant.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

---
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 17

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any additional

revenues resulting from the imposition of, or any change in, any tax

or fee should be applied to reducing our Nation’s public debt.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. DUNCAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

any additional revenues resulting from the imposition

of, or any change in, any tax or fee should be applied

to reducing our Nation’s public debt.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that any revenues resulting from the imposi3 tion of, or any change in, any tax or fee should be applied

4 to reducing our Nation’s public debt if such imposition

5 or change is pursuant to a law enacted after the date that

6 this resolution is adopted.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         152,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,700
<INVENTORY>                                     60,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               283,400
<PP&E>                                       4,911,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,392,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,806,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          712,800
<BONDS>                                        257,600
<COMMON>                                         7,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,073,300
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,244,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,806,900
<SALES>                                        867,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               978,100
<CGS>                                          351,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  613,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               218,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 96,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    96,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
# C_2023164EN.01000501.xml

| 8.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 March 2023 — American Airlines Inc. v European Commission, Delta Air Lines Inc.

(Case C-127/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Concentrations between undertakings - Air transport market - Concentration declared compatible with the internal market - Commitments entered into by the parties to the concentration - Decision granting grandfathering rights - Concept of ‘appropriate use’)

(2023/C 164/05)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: American Airlines Inc. (represented by: J.-P. Poitras, avocat, J. Ruiz Calzado, abogado, and J. Wileur, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: T. Franchoo, H. Leupold and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents), Delta Air Lines Inc. (represented by: C. Angeli, avocate, M. Demetriou, Barrister-at-Law, and I. Giles, advocaat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders American Airlines Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and Delta Air Lines Inc. in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders American Airlines Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and Delta Air Lines Inc. in the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 163, 3.5.2021.

---
#### AMOS STAYTON *vs.*ZADOC WILLEY.

A justice of the peace cannot grant a new trial in an action of trespass.

Certiorari.

Record. *“ Willey*vs. *Stayton.*Summons'issued 23d Oct. 1835, for $12,'in an action of trespass, for damage done in carrying away corn out of lot of ground as per account filed ; returnable 30th October, instant, when the parties appeared and plaintiff asked a postponement, which was granted, and the case continued to 13th November next; when the parties appeared again, the case was referred. Referees report no cause of action. Judgment. December 25th 1835, the plaintiff appeared and craved a second trial by referees, which is granted. Trial had and report and judgment for plaintiff for $8 25.

Exceptions : — 1st. That the summons issued in an action of trespass without any written statement of the injury complained of. 2d. That the'justice granted a new trial in an action of trespass, which by law he could not do. *(Digest*360, 326.) 3d. Because it does not appear that the referees were sworn, which has been decided to be a fatal error. *Ray use of Moon*vs. Hall, 1 *Harr. Rep.*106.

*Cullen*for plaintiff in error.

*The Court*

directed a reversal, on the ground taken in the *second*exception, thereby deciding that a justice of the peace cannot grant a new trial in an action of trespass.

Judgment reversed.
Henrik Weber observe p roductions 1003 Hazel Court C hesapeake, VA 23325

Dear Federal Aviation Administration,

Thank you for your letter from August 27, 2015, informing me about your need for additional information. Please see below the information you requested. Please don ’ t hesi tate to get in touch if there ’ s anything else I can provide. You can reach me via
815

- 212

- 9151.

Comment	Tracking	Number: 1jz

- 8jcx

- b1e7



### "How your request would benefit the public as a whole"

Over the last five years, I have frequently worked for non

- profit organizations, one based locally and one internationally, helping them to fulfill their mission, creating awareness videos, by donatin g my skills and equipment. Granting me the necessary exemptions would benefit these and other non

- profit organizations.

Please grant me the exemptions so that I can continue to be of service to these non

profit organizations, while complying with FAA reg ulations.



### "Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your petition"

For the past four years, I have been involved in UAV operations, assembling, maintaining and flying. Safety is always my highest priority. If there would be a situation that would compromise the safety and wellbeing of those around me, I would abort the flight.

The UAV that I’ m operating can be set to fly only within a g iven distance and altitude

, which protects people and structures because it automatically stays within my desired limits.This invisible, GPS

- enabled “geofence” prevents me from accidentally flying in to unwanted areas or obstacles; furthermo re I ́m creating a saf e flight by only flying line of sight

.

If the Intelligent Flight Battery is running low, or the UAV loses the connection with the remote controller for any reason, the aircraft will automatically return to the takeoff point and land safely. Anytime during the “co ming home” sequence I can abort the flight and take control manually to ensure everybody’s safety.The UAV automatically logs and remembers the details of every flight. Complete flight route , flight time, flight distance, flight location, and cached versions of any photos and videos taken during the flight are logged fo r future reference and maintenance records. At the same time, an advanced flight recorder constantly records data from all of my UAV’s internal mechanisms, which c an be easily shared with the

m anufacturer if there is ever any questions or issue.

Furtherm o re the UAV is equipped with a w arning system that informs me abo ut possible flight restrict ion s. Befor e every flight I inspect the area or potential restrictions or dangers, and I am conscious of the feedback that the UAV gives me throughout the flight. Pl ease see below for additional manufacturer’s information about no

- fly zones and the ability for the UAV to automatically s tay grounded when in a no

- fly zone.