alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                               5                       
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                               2,295
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,302
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          7,978
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    20,457
<PP&E>                                              48,008
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (10,245)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     135,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               52,631
<BONDS>                                             26,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                12
<OTHER-SE>                                          51,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       135,053
<SALES>                                             12,487
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    81,570
<CGS>                                                9,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      102,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (23,471)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (9,388)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (14,083)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        229
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (14,312)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (1.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (1.15)
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 32124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14756]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Committee on Breast Cancer in Young Women, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention; Notice of Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 
October 6, 1972, that the Advisory Committee on Breast Cancer in Young 
Women (ACBCYW), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department 
of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period 
through June 17, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Temeika L. Fairley, Ph.D., Designated 
Federal Officer, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and 
Health Promotion, CDC, 5770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop K52, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30341, Telephone (770) 488-4518, Fax (770) 488-4760. Email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#58393b3a3b212f183b3c3b763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="accdcfcecfd5dbeccfc8cf82cbc3da">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2018-14756 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Robert Delacy SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-691.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 27, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
31.3



CERTIFICATION



I,
Frank F. Khulusi, certify that:



1.       I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PCM, Inc.; and



2.       Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.



|Date: May 1, 2017 | /s/
    Frank F. Khulusi
|----------------- | ------------------------
|                  | Frank F. Khulusi        
|                  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.1


 


CYCLACEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


200 Connell Drive, Suite 1500


Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922


 


January 14, 2021


 


Mr. Spiro Rombotis


c/o Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


200 Connell Drive, Suite 1500


Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922


 


Dear Mr. Rombotis:


 


Reference is made to the agreement between
us (the “Agreement”) made as of January 1, 2019. This will confirm our agreement to extend the Agreement through the
period ended June 30, 2021, effective as of January 1, 2021. Please confirm your agreement to the foregoing by signing below in
the space provided.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	CYCLACEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Paul McBarron
	 	Name:	Paul McBarron
	 	Title:	EVP, Finance & COO


 


	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:	 
	 	 
	/s/ Spiro Rombotis	 
	Spiro Rombotis
#### People, Respondent, v Louise K. Nolley, Appellant.

[656 NYS2d 1005]

Motion for reargument denied. Memorandum: We have considered the issues raised in defendant’s *pro se*supplemental brief and conclude that they lack merit. Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Balio and Fallon, JJ.
#### Early Lee DAVIS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-65.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 3, 1972.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Steven E. Rohan, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order revoking appellant’s probationary sentences and imposing two sentences of two years in the *79State prison, said sentences to run concurrently.

We have given full consideration to the record on appeal and the briefs filed herein, and it appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that prejudicial error was committed in the proceedings below, the order appealed herein is affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and JOHNSON and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
#### Ex parte TURPIN WRIGHT.

Judgment cannot be entered against husband and wife on a bond and warrant of attorney given by the wile *dum, sola.*

*■Mr. Cullen*

moved for leave to enter judgment at the suit of Turpin Wright, against Isaac Bradley and Eliza Ann his wife, on a bond and warrant of attorney to confess judgment given by the said Eliza Ann, before her marriage with the said Isaac. He founded his motion on an affidavit of the marriage, and that the bond (which he produced) was still due and unpaid.

*Cullen*.

The application is reasonable in principle, and sustained by precedent. Without it injustice would be done to the creditor. He cannot reach the husband’s property' by a judgment against the wife, yet by force of the marriage, her property has become his, and if she were to die, the creditor’s remedy is gone. Yet the law makes the husband liable for the wife’s debts; and justly, for he has her property, and he should take her *cum onere. 3 Burr. Rep.*1460. Leave granted to enter judgment for husband and wife, on bond with warrant given *to wife*before marriage. *2 Chitty Rep.*114; 18 *Com. Law. Rep.*269. Judgment allowed to be entered up against husband and wife, on a warrant of attorney given by the wife dum sola. 1 *Shower*91; 3 *Harr. Digest*568; *Tide!*570.

*Per curiam.*

We refuse the motion. There is no authority given to enter judgment against, the husband; the terms of the warrant do not authorize it. The case in 18th *Com. Law Rep.,*seems not to have been much considered; there was no objection made. A case in 1 *Salk.*117, 399, is against it, and we think on sound principles.

Motion refused.
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 11

                        Golden West Financial Corporation
              Statement of Computation of Earnings (Loss) Per Share
                 (Dollars in thousands except per share figures)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Three Months Ended          Six Months Ended
                                                June 30                    June 30
                                        ------------------------   ------------------------
                                           1997         1996          1997         1996
                                        -----------   ----------   -----------  -----------
<S>                                     <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>    
  Earnings Before Cumulative Effect of
     Change in Accounting for Goodwill  $   87,277    $  79,585    $  170,651   $  158,178
  Cumulative Effect of Change in
     Accounting for Goodwill                   -0-          -0-           -0-     (205,242)
                                        -----------   ----------   ----------   -----------
  Net Earnings (Loss)                   $    87,277   $   79,585   $  170,651   $  (47,064)
                                        ===========   ==========   ==========   ===========

  Average Number of Common
     Shares Outstanding                  56,892,526    58,283,423   57,102,416   58,536,031
                                        ===========    ==========   ==========   ===========

  Earnings Per Share Before Cumulative
    Effect of Change in Accounting for
    Goodwill                            $     1.54     $    1.35    $     2.99   $     2.69
  Cumulative Effect of Change in
    Accounting for Goodwill                   0.00          0.00          0.00        (3.49)
                                        -----------   ----------   ----------   -----------
  Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share      $     1.54     $    1.35    $     2.99   $     (.80)
                                        ===========   ==========   ===========  ===========
</TABLE>


                                       34
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2013

p1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2013

147851 & (16)(17)

PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147851

COA: 314404

Luce CC: 2007

- 000889

- FC

TAMMY JO WILLIAMS

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). T he

motions for appointment of counsel and remand are DENIED.
#### Calvin LEE v. Charles D. LANCASTER, Jr.

No. 5307.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

May 4, 1972.

Rehearing Denied May 9, 1972.

*125Gerald J. Martinez, Everhardt & Martinez, Metairie, for plaintiff-appellant.

Ben C. Toledano, Porteous, Toledano, Hainkel & Johnson, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.

Before REGAN, SAMUEL, CHASEZ, REDMANN, LEMMON, GULOTTA, and BOUTALL, JJ.

PER' CURIAM.

Plaintiff, the democratic candidate for Representative of House District 80, appeals a judgment which dismissed, on exception to the court’s jurisdiction, plaintiff’s demand that defendant, the Republican candidate who won the general election, be declared ineligible for failure to meet the residency requirements for legislators stated by Const, art. 3 § 9.1

But Const, art. 3 § 10 provides:

> “Each house shall be the judge of the qualifications, election, and returns of its own members, choose its own officers, except the president of the Senate, determine the rules of its procedure, not inconsistent with the' provisions -of this Constitution, and may punish its members for disorderly conduct and contempt, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds of all its members elected, may expel a member.”

Where art. 3 § 10 is applicable, as in the case of a general election contest, the courts have no jurisdiction. State ex rel. O’Donnell v. Houston, 40 La.Ann. 598, 4 So. 482 (1888).

 Plaintiff argues eligibility under art. 3 § 9 is not among the “qualifications” of which the House is the judge under art. 3 § 10. To the contrary, we hold that it is precisely those qualifications (including residency) which are stated by art. 3 § 9 of which § 10 makes the House the judge.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

. “Every elector under this Constitution shall be eligible to a seat in the House of Representatives, and every elector who has reached the age of twenty-five years shall be eligible to a seat in the Senate; provided, that no person shall be eligible to the Legislature unless at the time of his election he has been a citizen of the State for five years, and an actual resident of the district or parish or ward of the parish of Orleans from which he may be elected for two years immediately preceding his election. The seat of any member who may change his residence from the district or parish or ward of the parish of Orleans which he represents shall thereby be vacated, any declaration of a retention of domicile to the contrary notwithstanding; and members of the Legislature shall be elected for a term of four years.”
# C_2023112EN.01000901.xml

| 27.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 February 2023 — Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union

(Case C-708/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 - Article 2b and Article 9(2) - Decision 2010/788/CFSP - Article 3(2) and Article 9(2) - Applicant continuing to be included on the lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures - Decision (CFSP) 2019/2109 - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2101)

(2023/C 112/11)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Évariste Boshab (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M.-C. Cadilhac and S. Lejeune, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Évariste Boshab to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Évariste Boshab to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 51, 31.1.2022.

---
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

October 5, 2012 

ERRATA 

______________________ 

Appeal No. 2012-3110 

STEPHEN W. GINGERY, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 

Decided: October 5, 2012 

______________________ 

This opinion is nonprecedential. Please add the following 

to the top of the first page of the opinion: 

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
[No. 927-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

October 18, 1971.]

#### Jack Dwight Barnard, *Respondent,*v. Carolyn M. Barnard, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. D-17230, Ward Roney, J., entered April 23, 1970. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
# C_2021452EN.01000701.xml

| 8.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 452/7 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Pitești (Romania) lodged on 19 July 2021 — SC Avicarvil Farms SRL v Ministerul Agriculturii și Dezvoltării Rurale, Agenția pentru Finanțarea Investițiilor Rurale, Agenția de Plăti și Intervenție în Agricultură, Agenția de Plăți și Intervenție în Agricultură — Centrul Județean Vâlcea (Case C-443/21) (2021/C 452/07) Language of the case: Romanian Referring court Curtea de Apel Pitești Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: SC Avicarvil Farms SRL Defendants: Ministerul Agriculturii și Dezvoltării Rurale, Agenția pentru Finanțarea Investițiilor Rurale, Agenția de Plăti și Intervenție în Agricultură, Agenția de Plăți și Intervenție în Agricultură — Centrul Județean Vâlcea Question referred Does Article 143 of Regulation No 1303/2013, ( 1 ) in conjunction with Article 310 TFEU (principle of sound financial management) and Article 40(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 ( 2 ) [reproduced in Article 33(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 ( 3 )], together with the principles of the protection of legitimate expectations and of legal certainty, preclude an administrative practice of the national authorities involved in the implementation of a non-repayable financial support measure which, as a result of a calculation error found by the European Court of Auditors, have issued acts ordering a reduction in the amount of the financial support granted in the PNSR, approved by European Commission Decision C(2012) 3529 of 25 May 2012, before the adoption of a new European Commission decision excluding from financing amounts exceeding the additional costs and income foregone resulting from the commitments made, as a result of those calculation errors? ( 1 )  Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 320). ( 2 )  Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2005 L 277, p. 1). ( 3 )  Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 487).

---
[No. 542-1.

Division Three.

September 27, 1971.]

#### Doris Berks Miracle, *Appellant,*v. Hugh Miracle, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 91726, Edward M. Nollmeyer, J., entered December 8, 1971. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:34 AM

To: 'mvrjohnson@outlook.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Info rmation - Avigators [FAA-2014-0720]

Dear Mr. Michael V. R. Johnson:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2014

‐ 0720). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

• Describe the aircraft make(s) and model(s) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include

the following: size, maximum weight (including payload), and aircraft type (i.e.

‐ fixed

‐ wing,rotorcraft, lighter

‐ than

‐ air). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

• Identify the type of power source for each proposed aircraft.

• Provide information regarding the radio frequency spectrum(s). This information can be located in the aircraft

manual(s).

• Your petition references a pre

‐ flight briefing and/or checklist on page four. Describe the process used to

determine if the UAS is airworthy and in safe condition for operation in the NAS.

• Describe the process used to document UAS discrepancies and the corrective action taken in the aircraft

record. Examples of processes include (1) the petitioner has elected to use its own process to maintain its UAS and

ensure that only airworthy and safe UAS will be allowed to operate in the NAS and (2) the petitioner has elected to

maintain its UAS in accordance with the manufacturer maintenance and inspection recommendations.

• Your petition references the materials listed below, however the materials were not submitted for the

record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

• Operator’s Manual (Ref. Pg. #7, 8 petition)

• Operating handbook (Ref. Pg. #10 petition)

• Flight manual (Ref. Pg. #10 petition)

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 3/5/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 95212
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

KIMBERLEY ANN KARDELIS

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT
FROM RETIRED STATUS :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 24 6 DB 201 8 (No. 18 RST 2019)

Attorney Registration No. 63827

( Cumberland County )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25 th day of February

, 201 9 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated February 11 , 2019

, is approved and it is ORDERED

that Kimberley Ann Kardelis

, who has been on Retired Status

, has never been suspended

or disbarred, and has demonstrated that s he has the moral qualifications, competency

and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and

is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of th e Bar of this Commonwealth. The

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall

be paid by the Petitioner.