Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2019
                              La Fuente Ocular Prosthetics, LLC, DAB CR5473 (2019)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




La Fuente Ocular Prosthetics, LLC, DAB CR5473 (2019)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





La Fuente Ocular Prosthetics, LLC,
	(PTAN: 5200600001)
	(NPI: 1811194368),
	Petitioner,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-17-655Decision No. CR5473November 21, 2019

        
              
    

      DECISION
Petitioner, La Fuente Ocular Prosthetics, LLC, is an Oklahoma supplier of durable medical equipment, orthotics, and supplies.  It participated in the Medicare program until November 20, 2016, when the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) revoked its billing privileges.  CMS took this action pursuant to 42 C.F.R. §§ 424.57(c)(2), 424.535(a)(1), and 424.535(a)(2), because the Office of Inspector General (IG) for the Department of Health and Human Services excluded one if its owners from participating in federal health care programs and because the supplier did not report the exclusion to the Medicare contractor.
Petitioner appeals.
I find that CMS is authorized to revoke Petitioner’s Medicare billing privileges for two independent reasons:  1) one of its owners was excluded from program participation; and 2) Petitioner did not report that exclusion to the Medicare contractor.  I therefore affirm CMS’s determination.
Page 2
Background
By letter dated January 6, 2017, the Medicare contractor, National Supplier Clearinghouse, advised Petitioner that its Medicare privileges were revoked, effective November 20, 2016.  As the letter explains, the contractor acted pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(2) because Brandon La Fuente, an owner of La Fuente Ocular Prosthetics LLC, had been excluded from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and all other federal healthcare programs.  The contractor also acted pursuant to 42 C.F.R. §§ 424.535(a)(1) and 424.57(c) because Petitioner did not timely report the exclusion.  CMS Ex. 1 at 9-12.
The contractor imposed a three-year enrollment bar, pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(c)(1).  CMS Ex. 1 at 9.
Petitioner requested reconsideration.  In a reconsidered determination, dated April 6, 2017, a CMS hearing officer upheld the revocation.  CMS Ex. 1 at 1-5.  Petitioner timely appealed and that appeal is now before me.
CMS moves for summary judgment.  Because neither party proposes any witnesses, an in-person hearing would serve no purpose.  *See* Acknowledgment and Pre-hearing Order at 5 (¶¶ 7, 9, 10).  The matter may therefore be decided based on the written record, without considering whether the standards for summary judgment are satisfied.
CMS submits its motion and brief (CMS Br.) with two exhibits (CMS Exs. 1-2).  Petitioner submits its brief and seven exhibits (P. Exs. 1-7).  In the absence of any objections, I admit into evidence CMS Exs. 1-2 and P. Exs. 1-7.
Discussion
***CMS may revoke Petitioner’s Medicare billing privileges because one of its owners was excluded from participating in federal healthcare programs and because Petitioner did not timely report the exclusion to the Medicare contractor***.1
On its face, this case seems straight-forward.  CMS may revoke a supplier’s Medicare billing privileges if any of its owners is excluded from Medicare, Medicaid, and any other federal healthcare program in accordance with section 1128 of the Social Security Act.  42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(2)(i); *see also* Social Security Act (Act) § 1866(b)(2)(C).  If, as here, the revocation is based on a federal exclusion, the effective date of the revocation must be the date of the exclusion.  42 C.F.R. § 424.535(g); *Norman Johnson, M.D.*, DAB
Page 3
No. 2779 at 20 (2017) (holding that ALJs are not permitted to depart from the regulation’s plain text).
Effective November 20, 2016, the IG excluded one of Petitioner’s owners, Brandon R. La Fuente, from participating in all federal health care programs because he had been convicted of a program-related offense.  CMS Ex. 1 at 68; *see* CMS Ex. 1 at 6 (claiming to have severed all ties with Brandon La Fuente as of January 2017); CMS Ex. 1 at 33 (showing that Brandon R. La Fuente was an owner and managing member of the company as of January 1, 2017); CMS Ex. 1 at 42 (transferring Brandon R. La Fuente’s 80% interest in the company to Henry La Fuente, effective January 6, 2017).
Thus, because Petitioner’s owner and managing member was excluded from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal healthcare programs, CMS properly revoked its Medicare enrollment pursuant to section 424.535(a)(2)(i).  The effective date of its revocation must be the date of the owner’s exclusion, November 20, 2016.  42 C.F.R. § 424.535(g).
CMS may also revoke a supplier’s billing privileges if it is not in compliance with enrollment requirements.  42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(1).  Among those requirements, a supplier must respond to questions on its application for billing privileges with “complete and accurate information” and must, within 30 days, report to CMS any changes in the information it has supplied.  42 C.F.R. § 424.57(c)(2).  Here, Petitioner did not, within 30 days, report its owner’s exclusion.  In fact, in a January 2017 enrollment application, Petitioner withheld that information.  The application asked it to report “each final adverse legal action,” including “any suspension or exclusion from participation in . . . a federal or state health care program.”  In response, Petitioner reported that, on July 31, 2015, Brandon La Fuente completed “probation requirements.”  CMS Ex. 1 at 29, 33.  Because Petitioner did not mention the owner’s exclusion, CMS properly revoked its Medicare enrollment under 42 C.F.R. §§ 424.57(c)(2) and 424.535(a)(1).
Petitioner concedes that its owner was excluded from program participation and that it failed to report the exclusion within 30 days, but argues that CMS should not revoke its billing privileges because Brandon La Fuente was not, in fact, convicted; he pled nolo contendere to state charges of Medicare/Medicaid fraud and was given a deferred sentence.  The statute governing exclusions is explicit:  for exclusion purposes, a “conviction” includes a plea of nolo contendere as well as a deferred adjudication or other arrangement where a judgment of conviction has been withheld.  Act § 1128(i) (3).  In any event, Brandon La Fuente’s exclusion is a final determination, by which we are all bound.  Petitioner may not use these proceedings to revisit a legally-binding and administratively-final determination.  *See Karthik Ramaswamy, M.D.*, DAB No. 2563 at 9 (2014) (en banc), *aff’d*,*Ramaswamy v. Burwell*, 83 F. Supp. 3d 846 (E.D. Mo. 2015).
Page 4
Petitioner also points out that it ended its business relationship with Brandon La Fuente, which it did – but not until *after* he had been excluded from program participation.  That it timely reported the severed ties is simply irrelevant to the question of whether it reported the exclusion.
Finally, Petitioner argues that CMS is not required to revoke its billing privileges and should have exercised its discretion not to do so.  My authority here is limited; I may decide whether CMS was legally authorized to revoke.  If so, I must affirm the action.  I may not substitute my own judgments as to how CMS should have exercised its discretion. *Breton L. Morgan, M.D., Inc. and Breton L. Morgan, M.D.*, DAB No. 2933 at 3 (2019).
Conclusion
CMS may revoke Petitioner’s Medicare enrollment because one of its owners was excluded from program participation and because it did not report that exclusion to the Medicare contractor.  I therefore affirm CMS’s determination.


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law to support my decision. back to note 1 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back