alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 580 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 580

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       October 7, 1994.
    Resolved, That a revised edition of the Rules and Manual of the House of 
Representatives for the One Hundred Fourth Congress be printed as a House 
document, and that two thousand additional copies shall be printed and bound for 
the use of the House of Representatives, of which seven hundred copies shall be 
bound in leather with thumb index and delivered as may be directed by the 
Parliamentarian of the House for distribution to officers and Members of 
Congress.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Bombardier Paul·Andre 7/10109 No objection

Aerospace Brossard·Jaimes

Transpon Canada Richard Topham 7/10/09 No objection

National Business Elias Coni, Manager 7/10/09 No objection

Aircaft Assoc Technical Services

(NBAA)

Regional Airline Dave Lotterer, 7117/09 No objection

Assoc (RAA) Technical Advisor
#### Donald W. HARPSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 67-246.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 20, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### MANCHESTER INSURANCE AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Lucius DUNKLEY and Anthony Thompson, Appellees.

No. 73-882.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 24, 1973.

Vernis & Bowling, Coconut Grove, and Robert C. Lane, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Weissenborn, Burr & Hyman, Miami, for appellee (Thompson).

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Farish v. Lum’s, Inc., Fla.1972, 267 So.2d 325.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Golden Triangle Industries, Inc. for the period
ended JUNE 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000042284
<NAME> GOLDEN TRIANGLE INDUSTRIES, INC.

       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          185188
<SECURITIES>                                     28499
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1354817
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     229530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1811534
<PP&E>                                         7008005
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1888084
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7454855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           411901
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       5727
<COMMON>                                           592
<OTHER-SE>                                     7036635
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7454855
<SALES>                                        1828085
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1828490
<CGS>                                           774714
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   774714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                671100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4468
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 439733
<INCOME-TAX>                                    150671
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             289062
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    289062
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6803

ROBERT HOLLAND KOON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES M. CONDON, South Carolina Attorney

General,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Beaufort. C. Weston Houck, Senior District

Judge. (CA-01-3101-9-12)

Submitted: August 3, 2005 Decided: August 16, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Holland Koon, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*On limited remand, the district court found that April 16,

2004, is the earliest date that Koon could have properly delivered

the notice to prison officials for mailing to the court. See Fed.

R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). 

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert Holland Koon seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the

notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

March 16, 2004. The notice of appeal was filed, at the earliest,

on April 16, 2004.* Because Koon failed to file a timely notice of

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period,

we dismiss the appeal. We further deny Koon’s motions for

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
- 3 -

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4565

_____________________________

AARON LEE DURNING,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jan Shackelford, Judge.

June 6, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Candice Kaye Brower, Regional Conflict Counsel, Gainesville, and 

Michael Jerome Titus, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Tabitha Rae Herrera,

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32-2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of The Goldfield Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen R.
Wherry, Senior Vice President, Treasurer, Assistant Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Goldfield Corporation and will be retained by The Goldfield Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ STEPHEN R. WHERRYStephen R. WherrySenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)November 14, 2008
H. Res. 3

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

January 5, 1993.

Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the Speaker on the part of the House of Representatives to join with a committee on the part of the Senate to notify the President of the United States that a

quorum of each House has assembled and Congress is ready

to receive any communication that he may be pleased to

make.

Attest:

Clerk.
## SERVED JANUARY 26,2010

U.S. DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THEMAITER OF 

## MESA AIRLINES, INC. FAA DOCKET No. CP09ALOOll (Civil PenaltyAction) DMS No. FAA-2009-0972 

## ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE This matter currently is scheduled 

### to beheard on January 29,2010. Complainant Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") onJanuary 26,2010, filed a Motion for Continuance (,'Motion"). Respondent MesaAirlines, Inc. ("Respondent") petitioned for bankruptcy onJanuary 5,2010, the Motion recites, and the parties, who are in the process ofsettling the case, need to obtain the approval ofthe bankruptcytrustee for a valid settlement. In these unusual circumstances, the Motion continues, a continuance would be in the best interests ofboth parties. Respondent does not oppose the Motion. For good cause shown, Complainant's Motion is hereby GRANTED. The hearing in this matter is hereby continued; it will berescheduled by 

### subsequent order. 

# f2:LJ) C,**C~~** Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service ListFAA DocketNo. CP09ALOOll (Civil Penalty Action) SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration· 800 IndependenceAvenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite2Wl000 1 

### ONE COpy Christopher Pappaioanou, Respondent's Counsel Director, Legal Affairs Mesa Air Group, Respondent 410 N. 44th Street, Suite 100 Phoenix, AZ 85008 TEL: 602-685-4000 Laura 

### E. Jennings, Complainant's Counsel Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington,DC 20591
. TEL: 202-267-3452 FAX: 202-267-5106 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 Washington, DC20590 TEL: Attorney-Advisor: 202-366-2139 Legal Assistant: 202-366-5121 FAX: 202-366-7536

I Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal
. Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WlOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to
the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"),
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange
          Act; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Mark J. Wright
--------------------------
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and
Vice President of Finance
October 29, 2007
## tvk utkaAtilki

lLa IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 20-0005 

# FILED OCT 20 2020 IN RE THE MOTION OF WARREN D.DERN FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Warren D.Dem has filed a motion for admission to the Bar ofthe State ofMontana pursuant to Rule V ofthe Rules forAdmission,Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions Administrator ofthe State Bar ofMontana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Dem has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, Warren D. Dem may be swom in to the practice of law in the State of Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office ofthe Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. Lrx, DATED this E-4!) day ofOctober, 2020. 10/20/2020

Case Number: PR 20-0005..- 1144



# g --3 / / 4 •) 4 Justices

2
# C_2020262EN.01003301.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/33

---

Action brought on 4 June 2020 — Kfz-Gewerbe v EUIPO — The Blink Fish (Representation of a fish)

(Case T-354/20)

(2020/C 262/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Wirtschaftsgesellschaft des Kfz-Gewerbes mbH (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: N. Hebeis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The Blink Fish Srl (Milan, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Representation of a fish) — European Union trade mark No 17 301 359

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 April 2020 in Case R 2333/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | partially annul the contested decision as far as the following services of the contested European Union trade mark application No 17 301 359 are concerned:






  — | class 35: Advertising, Business management; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

partially annul the contested decision as far as the following services of the contested European Union trade mark application No 17 301 359 are concerned:

—

class 35: Advertising, Business management;

| — | class 38: Telecommunication services; |
| --- | --- |

—

class 38: Telecommunication services;

| — | class 41: Entertainment services, Sporting and cultural activities, Teaching, Training; |
| --- | --- |

—

class 41: Entertainment services, Sporting and cultural activities, Teaching, Training;

| — | order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in the failure to state reasons in the contested decision of the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in the failure to state reasons in the contested decision of the Board of Appeal.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets, the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-11-1999
<CASH>                                         150,099
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  195,997
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,109,487
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,541,230
<PP&E>                                       3,250,316
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,251,143
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,813,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,197,073
<BONDS>                                        427,063
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       232,891
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,365,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,813,384
<SALES>                                      7,500,231
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,500,231
<CGS>                                        5,784,132
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,784,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                322,547
<INCOME-TAX>                                   122,569
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            199,978
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   199,978
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.26


</TABLE>
#### REBECCA BEESON’S Ex’r. *vs.*THOMAS BEESON’S Adm’r.

In an action on a bond with a penal sum, you cannot go beyond the penalty and costs.

Debt on a bond. Rule to show cause why the proceedings should not be staid upon the defendant’s bringing into court the amount of the bond on which this action is founded.

The bond was for $100; conditioned for the payment of an annui-. ty of $20, during the life of Rebecca Beeson. The question was, whether the defendant might not have a stay of proceedings, on payment of the penalty of his bond, with costs; or, in other words, whether interest, or any thing, can be recovered on a bond beyond the penalty. There were five years’ annuity due.

*Bayard,*in support of the rule,

cited 1 *East.*436, *MClure*vs. *Duncan;*1 *Taunton*217; 1 *Saund. Rep.*320, *n.*

*Hamilton*contra,

cited 6 *Term Rep.*299; 3 *Eq. cases ah.*530; 2 *Mh. Rep.*579; 2 *Term Rep.*388; 9 *Cranch*104; 21 *Com. Law Rep.*391 ; 3 *Caine’s Rep.*48 ; 1 *Mass. Rep.*308 ; 2 *Dallas 252.*

The *Chief Justice*

said, the case in Term Reports has been overrul*38ed again and again. The undoubted principle of the common law is; that you cannot, go beyond the penalty, except a shilling by way of nominal damages; But our act of assembly is conclusive *(Digest*78.) All the sections of this law proceed on the same principle, that judgment shall be for the penalty and Costs-.

*Hamilton*and *Booth*for plaintiff

*J. A Bayard*for defendant-.

Buie absolute;
# C_2021035EN.01005201.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/52

---

Action brought on 16 November 2020 — Asian Gear v EUIPO — Multimox (Scooter)

(Case T-685/20)

(2021/C 35/69)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Asian Gear BV (Pijnacker, Netherlands) (represented by: B. Gravendeel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Multimox Holding BV (Rijen, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design No 607 155-0002

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 September 2020 in Case R 1042/2018-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul or vary the contested decision, so that Community design No 607 155-0002 is declared invalid; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul or vary the contested decision, so that Community design No 607 155-0002 is declared invalid;

| — | in the alternative, confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division of 30 April 2018 and annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division of 30 April 2018 and annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs to the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs to the applicant.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

---