alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Norman BIE, Appellant, v. Henry M. PUTNEY, Appellee.

No. 73-109.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 27, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ViroPharma Incorporated (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michel de Rosen                                                      
|Michel de Rosen                                                          
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors
|                                                                         
|August 1, 2006                                                           



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Vincent J. Milano                                                         
|Vincent J. Milano                                                             
|Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
|                                                                              
|August 1, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their                           ( print page 32122)                        views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than July 26, 2018.                

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City*                     (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

                    1.                     *Robert Claypool, Maysville, Missouri, and Mary Claypool, Pella, Iowa;*                     to acquire voting shares of Fairport Bancshares, Inc., Maysville, Missouri, and thereby indirectly acquire The Bank of Fairport, Maysville, Missouri.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 6, 2018.

Ann Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-14846 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
# C_2021368EN.01001801.xml

| 13.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/18

---

Order of the President of the Court of 17 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln — Germany) — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v TZ

(Case C-10/21) (1)

(2021/C 368/27)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 88, 15.03.2021.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No.33-33013, No. 33-33063, No. 33-65157, and No. 33-68860 on Forms S-8 and
Registration Statement No. 33-45815 on Form S-3 of Network Equipment
Technologies, Inc. of our reports dated April 16, 1997, appearing and
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Network
Equipment Technologies, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 1997.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
San Jose, California
June 23, 1997
#### Sylvester HENDERSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-935.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 8, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2023216EN.01003702.xml

| 19.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/37

---

Order of the President of the Court of 16 February 2023 — Oriol Junqueras i Vies v European Parliament, intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-824/21 P) (1)

(2023/C 216/47)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 84, 21.2.2022.

---
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                        THREE           NINE
                                                                                     MONTHS ENDED   MONTHS ENDED
                                                        YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,     SEPTEMBER 30,  SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                    ------------------------------   -------------  ------------
                                                    1994       1995         1996         1997           1997
                                                    ----       ----         ----         ----           ----
<S>                                                 <C>      <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>
Income per share calculations:

Income (Loss) before extraordinary item             $281     $  1,765     $  2,331    $ (12,592)    $  (14,083)

Extraordinary item                                    --           --           64           --            229
                                                    ----     --------     --------     --------        --------

Net income                                          $281     $  1,765     $  2,267     $(12,592)    $  (14,312)
                                                    ====     ========     ========     ========     ===========

Weighted average number
 of common and common
 equivalent shares are as follows:
   Weighted average common
    shares outstanding                                          3,184       10,273       12,360         12,243
   Shares issued from assumed
    exercise of options and
    warrants (1)                                                  211          182          157            171
                                                    ----     --------     --------     --------       ---------
   Weighted average number
    of shares outstanding                            N/A        3,395       10,455       12,517         12,414
                                                    ====     ========     ========     ========      ==========

Income per common and common equivalent shares:

   Income before extraordinary item                          $   0.52     $   0.23     $  (1.01)         (1.15) 

   Extraordinary item                                              --         0.01           --           0.02
                                                    ----     --------     --------     --------       ---------

   Net income                                        N/A     $   0.52     $   0.22     $  (1.01)         (1.17)
                                                    ====     ========     ========     ========       =========
</TABLE>


- ------------------------------------------

(1)  Shares issued from assumed exercise of options and warrants include the
     number of incremental shares which would result from applying the "treasury
     stock method" for options and warrants, APB 15, paragraph 38 and Staff
     Accouting Bulletin No. 83.
#### M. R. BELL and Certified Pulpwood Dealers Self-Insurers’ Fund, Petitioners, v. Willie HOPKINS and Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 40983.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 25, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
PROMISSORY
NOTE




$45,000.00
      CDN
              October 1st,
      2008





FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the
undersigned Global Clean Energy, Inc., a Maryland corporation ("Maker") promises
to pay to the order of Howard Stupp ("Lender"), at his principal office, or at
such other place as may be designated in writing by the holders of this
Promissory Note ("Note"), the principal sum of FORTY FIVE THOUSAND 00/100
CANADIAN DOLLARS ($45,000.00 CDN) (the "Principal Sum").  The unpaid
Principal Sum shall bear interest at 7.5% per annum and shall be due in twelve
(12) months.





All payments to be made under this Note
shall be payable in lawful money of the Canada which shall be legal tender for
public and private debts at the time of payment.





In the event that an action is
instituted to collect this Note, or any portion thereof, Maker promises to pay
all costs of collection, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys'
fees, court costs, and such other sums as the court may establish.





In the event of a default under this
Note when due, then the holder of this Note, at its election, may declare the
entire unpaid Principal Sum due and payable.





Every provision hereof is intended to
be several.  If any provision of this Note is determined, by a court
of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, such
illegality, invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the other provisions
hereof, which shall remain binding and enforceable.





This Note is made in the Province of
Quebec and it is mutually agreed that Quebec law shall apply to the
interpretation of the terms and conditions of this Note.





All agreements between the holder of
this Note and Maker are hereby expressly limited so that in no contingency or
event what­soever, whether by reason of deferment or acceleration of the
maturity of this Note or otherwise, shall the rate of interest hereunder exceed
the maximum permissible under applicable law with respect to the
holder.  If, from any circumstances whatsoever, the rate of interest
resulting from the payment and/or accrual of any amount of interest hereunder,
at any time that payment of interest is due and/or at any time that interest is
accrued, shall exceed the limits prescribed by such applicable law, then the
payment and/or accrual of such interest shall be reduced to that resulting from
the maximum rate of interest permissible under such applicable
law.  This provision shall never be superseded or waived.





The makers, endorsers, and/or
guarantors of this Note do hereby severally waive presentment, demand, protest
and notices of protest, demand, dishonor and nonpayment.









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
instrument is executed as of the date first hereinabove set forth.





GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY,
      INC.By:
              /s/ Kenneth AdesskyKenneth
      Adessky,C.F.O
#### Ralph H. WALTER as Tax Assessor of Duval County v. R. C. B. S. CORPORATION.

No. 38948.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 225 So.2d 426.
**Exhibit 32**
**CERTIFICATION**
Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in hiscapacity as an officer of Vitran Corporation Inc., that, to his knowledge, theQuarterly Report of Vitran Corporation Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of Vitran Corporation Inc.     Date: July 20, 2004By:  /s/ RICHARD E. GAETZ      Rick E. Gaetz   Chief Executive Officer     Date: July 20, 2004By:  /s/ KEVIN A. GLASS      Kevin A. Glass   Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,069
<INVENTORY>                                     13,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,881
<PP&E>                                          57,229
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,941
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,378
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,567
<SALES>                                         54,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,072
<CGS>                                           36,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,250)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,275)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        



</TABLE>
# C_2022237EN.01001401.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I — Germany) — Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG v HARTING Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Harting Electric GmbH & Co. KG

(Case C-44/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual property - Directive 2004/48/EC - Article 9(1) - European patent - Interim measures - Power of national judicial authorities to issue an interlocutory injunction to prevent an imminent infringement of an intellectual property right - National case-law dismissing applications for interim measures where the validity of the patent in question has not been confirmed, at the very least, by a decision given at first instance in opposition or invalidity proceedings - Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law)

(2022/C 237/17)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht München I

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG

Defendants: HARTING Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Harting Electric GmbH & Co. KG

Operative part of the judgment

Article 9(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights must be interpreted as precluding national case-law under which applications for interim relief for patent infringement must, in principle, be dismissed where the validity of the patent in question has not been confirmed, at the very least, by a decision given at first instance in opposition or invalidity proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 10.5.2021.

---
#### Edmond Joseph POIRE, Appellant, v. Anna Mary POIRE, Appellee.

No. 68-616.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

May 14, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0339 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-051-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model SA.315B Alouette III, SE.3160 Alouette III,

SA.316B Alouette III, SA.316C Alouette III, SA.319B Alouette III, SA 3180-ALOUETTE 

ASTAZOU, SA 318B-ALOUETTE ASTAZOU, and SA 318 C-ALOUETTE ASTAZOU 

Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 63 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: This purpose of this AD is to prevent temporary loss of tail rotor drive and subsequent 

loss of control of the helicopter. 

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $13 for inspecting the free-wheel cage assembly

$1,986 for modifying any affected free-wheel 

cage assembly

Labor per Helicopter

(8 x $85/work-hour for the 

inspection)

(8 x $85/work-hour for the 

modification)

$680

$680

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter

Inspection

Modification

$693

$2,666

Total US Fleet Cost

Inspection $43,659

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Rao Edupuganti
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011
-NM - 045
- AD **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
# C_2022051EN.01002001.xml

| 31.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht (Austria) lodged on 20 October 2021 — Climate Corporation Emissions Trading GmbH v Finanzamt Österreich

(Case C-641/21)

(2022/C 51/27)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Climate Corporation Emissions Trading GmbH

Respondent authority: Finanzamt Österreich

Question referred

Is Directive 2006/112/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/8/EC, (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the national authorities and courts must regard the place of supply of a service, which, under the written law, is formally located in the other Member State, in which the recipient of the supply is established, as being within the national territory if the domestic taxable person supplying the service should have known that, in supplying it, he or she was participating in value added tax evasion committed in the context of a chain of supplies?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1), as amended by Council Directive 2008/8/EC of 12 February 2008 amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the place of supply of services (OJ 2008 L 44, p. 11).

---
#### Robert L. RUITER v. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 38368.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 1969.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.