32630 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 135 / Friday, July 13, 2018 / Notices 

3 In these final results, Commerce applied the 

assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

4See, e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality 

Steel Plate Products from the Republic of Korea: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and New Shipper Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 

62712, 62714 (September 12, 2016). 

Commerce will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

For DSM and Hyundai Steel, we 

calculated importer-specific assessment 

rates on the basis of the ratio of the total 

amount of antidumping duties 

calculated for each importer’s examined 

sales and the total entered value of the 

sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).3 For entries of subject 

merchandise during the period of 

review produced by DSM or Hyundai 

Steel for which it did not know its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. We intend to issue 

liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days 

after publication of the final results of 

these reviews. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of 

this notice for all shipments of CTL 

plate from Korea entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the date of publication, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for the companies 

listed above will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this review but 

covered in a prior completed segment of 

the proceeding, the cash deposit rate 

will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most 

recent period; (3) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation but 

the producer has been covered in a prior 

complete segment of this proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the producer of the merchandise; (4) 

the cash deposit rate for all other 

manufacturers or exporters will 

continue to be 0.98 percent,4 the allothers rate determined in the less-thanfair-value investigation, adjusted for the 

export-subsidy rate in the companion 

countervailing duty investigation. These 

cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a violation subject to sanction. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: July 9, 2018. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive duties and 

functions of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

Summary 

Background 

Scope of the Order 

Discussion of the Issue 

Comment: Home Market Date of Sale 

[FR Doc. 2018–15018 Filed 7–12–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Environmental Technologies Trade 

Advisory Committee (ETTAC) Public 

Meeting 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Administration, DOC. 

ACTION: Notice of an open meeting of a 

Federal Advisory Committee. 

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the 

schedule and proposed agenda of a 

meeting of the Environmental 

Technologies Trade Advisory 

Committee (ETTAC). 

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for 

Tuesday, July 24, 2018 from 9:00 a.m.– 

2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). 

The deadline for members of the public 

to register or to submit written 

comments for dissemination prior to the 

meeting is 5:00 p.m. EDT on Friday, July 

13, 2018. The deadline for members of 

the public to request auxiliary aids is 

5:00 p.m. EDT on Friday, July 13, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place 

at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 

1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 

Washington, DC 20230. The address to 

register and obtain call-in information; 

submit comments; or request auxiliary 

aids is: Ms. Amy Kreps, Office of Energy 

& Environmental Industries (OEEI), 

International Trade Administration, 

Room 28018, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230 or email: 

amy.kreps@trade.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Amy Kreps, Office of Energy & 

Environmental Industries (OEEI), 

International Trade Administration, 

Room 28018, 1401 Constitution Avenue, 

NW, Washington, DC 20230 (Phone: 

202–482–3835; Fax: 202–482–5665; 

email: amy.kreps@trade.gov) 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

meeting will take place on July 24 from 

9:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. EDT. The general 

meeting is open to the public and time 

will be permitted for public comment 

from 1:30–2:00 p.m. EDT. Members of 

the public seeking to attend the meeting 

are required to register in advance. 

Those interested in attending must 

provide notification by Friday, July 13, 

2018 at 5:00 p.m. EDT, via the contact 

information provided above. This 

meeting is physically accessible to 

people with disabilities. Requests for 

sign language interpretation or other 

auxiliary aids should be directed to 

OEEI at (202) 482–3835 no less than one 

week prior to the meeting. Requests 

received after this date will be accepted, 

but it may not be possible to 

accommodate them. 

Written comments concerning ETTAC 

affairs are welcome any time before or 

after the meeting. To be considered 

during the meeting, written comments 

must be received by Friday, July 13, 

2018 at 5:00 p.m. EDT to ensure 

transmission to the members before the 

meeting. Minutes will be available 

within 30 days of this meeting. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 135 / Friday, July 13, 2018 / Notices 32631 

1See Certain Steel Nails from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 2012–2013, 80 FR 

18816 (April 8, 2015) and accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum (Final Results). 

2See Xi’an Metals & Minerals Import & Export 

Co., Ltd. v. United States, 256 F.Supp. 3d 1346, 

1356 (CIT September 6, 2017) (Remand Order). 

3 Id., at 1359. 

4See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Remand, Consol. Court No. 15–00109, Slip 

Op. 17–120 (CIT 2017), dated December 21, 2017 

(AR5 Remand Redetermination), available at http:// 

enforcement.trade.gov/remands/17-120.pdf. 

5 Id., at 7–14. 

6 Id., at 15–16. 

7 Id., at 19. 

8See Xi’an Metals & Minerals Import & Export 

Co., Ltd. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 15– 

00109, Slip Op. 18–70 (CIT June 19, 2018) (Final 

Judgment) at 3. 

9 Id., at 2–3. 

10See ‘‘Amended Final Results for the Fifth 

Administrative Review of Certain Steel Nails from 

Continued 

Topic to be considered: At this final 

meeting of the current (2016–2018) 

ETTAC charter, interagency 

representatives of the Trade Promotion 

Coordinating Committee’s 

Environmental Trade Working Group 

(TPCC ETWG) will respond to the 

recommendations that the ETTAC 

presented to the Secretary of 

Commerce’s designee on May 15. The 

meeting will be co-chaired by senior 

officials from the International Trade 

Administration and the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency. The 

ETTAC’s recommendations cover two 

primary themes: (1) Recommendations 

regarding how the U.S. Government can 

help level the playing field, address 

barriers and increase opportunities for 

U.S. environmental exporters through 

market development efforts, export 

financing, and trade policy engagements 

and negotiations; and recommendations 

aimed at improving the overall quality 

of services delivered by the U.S. 

Government to U.S. environmental 

exporters through enhancements to 

digital tools aimed at improving lead 

generation, lead dissemination, and 

metrics and tracking. The 

recommendations were developed by 

the ETTAC’s three subcommittees: 

Trade Promotion and Export Market 

Development, Professional Services and 

Infrastructure Advancement, and Trade 

Policy and American Competitiveness. 

OEEI will make the final agenda 

available to the public at least one week 

prior to the meeting. Please email 

amy.kreps@trade.gov or contact 202– 

482–3835 for a copy. 

Background: The ETTAC is mandated 

by Section 2313(c) of the Export 

Enhancement Act of 1988, as amended, 

15 U.S.C. 4728(c), to advise the 

Environmental Trade Working Group of 

the Trade Promotion Coordinating 

Committee, through the Secretary of 

Commerce, on the development and 

administration of programs to expand 

U.S. exports of environmental 

technologies, goods, services, and 

products. The ETTAC was originally 

chartered in May of 1994. It was most 

recently re-chartered until August 2018. 

Dated: July 9, 2018. 

Man Cho, 

Deputy Director, Office of Energy and 

Environmental Industries. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14994 Filed 7–12–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–909] 

Certain Steel Nails From the People’s 

Republic of China: Notice of Court 

Decision Not in Harmony With the 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

and Notice of Amended Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On June 19, 2018, the United 

States Court of International Trade 

(Court) issued its final judgment in 

Xi’an Metals & Minerals Import & 

Export Co., Ltd. v. United States, 

Consol. Court No. 15–00109, sustaining, 

in part, and vacating, in part, the U.S. 

Department of Commerce’s (Commerce) 

final remand results in the fifth 

administrative review of certain steel 

nails from the People’s Republic of 

China (China). Commerce is notifying 

the public that the final judgment in this 

case is not in harmony with Commerce’s 

final results of the administrative 

review, covering the period of review 

(POR) August 1, 2012, through July 31, 

2013, and that Commerce is amending 

the final results with respect to the 

dumping margin assigned to The 

Stanley Works (Langfang) Fastening 

Systems Co., Ltd. (Stanley). The margin 

for Xi’an Metals & Minerals Import & 

Export Co., Ltd. (Xi’an Metals) remains 

unchanged as a result of the Court’s 

final judgment. 

DATES: Applicable June 19, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Matthew Renkey, AD/CVD Operations 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2312. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 8, 2015, Commerce issued 

the Final Results, in which it 

determined weighted-average dumping 

margins of 13.19 percent for Stanley and 

72.52 percent Xi’an Metals.1 On 

September 6, 2017, the Court remanded 

to Commerce certain aspects of the Final 

Results, ordering Commerce to 

reconsider, in relevant part: (1) The 

potential double counting of certain 

labor costs by including line items such 

as ‘‘Salary & Bonus,’’ ‘‘Welfare,’’ and 

‘‘Social Security and Compensation’’ as 

selling, general, and administrative 

(SG&A) expenses in the surrogate 

financial ratios; 2 and (2) the presence of 

a transcription error in Stanley’s postverification factors of production (FOP) 

database.3

On December 21, 2017, Commerce 

filed the AR5 Remand Redetermination 

with the Court.4 Under respectful 

protest, Commerce recalculated the 

surrogate financial ratios by 

reclassifying certain labor-related line 

items from the selling, general, and 

administrative expenses numerator, to 

the materials, labor, and energy 

denominator of the financial ratios.5

Additionally, under respectful protest, 

Commerce corrected the transcription 

error present in Stanley’s postverification FOP database.6 As a result 

of these modifications, there were 

changes to the dumping margins 

assigned to both Xi’an Metals and 

Stanley. The resulting antidumping 

margins for Xi’an Metals and Stanley 

were 64.27 percent and 8.04 percent, 

respectively.7

On June 19, 2018, the Court sustained 

the AR5 Remand Redetermination with 

respect to the correction of the 

transcription error in Stanley’s FOP 

database.8 In addition, the Court vacated 

the remand order with respect to the 

issue of the calculation of the surrogate 

financial ratios, and reinstated this 

aspect of Commerce’s Final Results.9 In 

light of the Court’s Final Judgment, the 

dumping margin for Xi’an Metals is 

unchanged from its dumping margin 

assigned in the Final Results. 

Additionally, because the Court 

reinstated the Final Results with respect 

to the calculation of the surrogate 

financial ratios, for these amended final 

results, we recalculated Stanley’s 

dumping margin to reflect only the 

correction of the transcription error in 

Stanley’s FOP database.10


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES