alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REGISTRATION 

NOT TRANSFERABLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA I This certificate DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION must be in the airCERTIFICATE OF AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION craft when operated. 

NATIONALITY AND I AIRCRAFT SERIAL NO. 

REGISTRATION MARKS N 5414P 0 12015 

MANUFACTURER AND MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF AIRCRAFT 

PERSISTENCE MINI NG INC ARMDS 

ICAO Aircraft Address Code: 51557225 

This certificate is 

issued for 

I PERSISTENCE MINING INC registration purposes s 5666 LA JOLLA BLVD# 3 1 5 only and is not a s LA JO LLA CA 92037-7523 certificate of title. u The Federal Aviation 

E Administration does 

0 not determine rights 

of ownership as 

T between private 

0 persons. 

Corporation 0 It is certified that the above described aircraft has been entered on the register of the Federal Aviation Ad

ministration, United States of America. in accordance with the Convention on 

International Civil Aviation dated December 7, 1944, and 

with Title 49, United States Code, 

and regulations issued thereunder. U.S. Department 

DATE OF ISSUE March 3, 201 5 

&6c-) of Transporta tion Federal A viation EXPIRATION DATE March3 1,201 8 ADMINISTRATOR Administ ration 

AC Form 8050.3 (1012010) Supersedes prevtOUs editions 

w 

z 

::; 

D 

UJ 

t: 

D 

D 

5 

,_ 

::> 

!2. 

U .S . Depart•:-'• •• • • .,. ~ of Transport • ;:..!i F ederal A v i ~ • • : 

Administ rat 

Crvil Avtahon Re • • •• : 

P.O. Box 25504 

Oklahoma City, OK 7312~504 

Official Business 

Penalty for Private Use $300 

AC Form 8050-3 (10/2010) Supersed

TO: PERSISTENCE 

M ININ

5666 LA JO LLA BLV

LA JOLLA CA 92037
#### Emerald Enterprises of Rochester, Inc., Appellant, v Chili Plaza Associates et al., Respondents.

[656 NYS2d 1011]

Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff operates a bar and restaurant in Chili-Paul Plaza. Its lease with the owner, defendant Chili Plaza Associates (CPA), provides that CPA will not lease space to a "tavern, saloon or bar.” The lease further provides that "this restriction has no application whatsoever, present or future, to any restaurant * * * conducting a bar and providing for * * * consumption and sale of alcoholic beverages as an incident to its restaurant food service business.” Plaintiff commenced this action to enjoin the operation of a business in the plaza by defendant T. F. Browns, Inc. on the ground that the proposed use of the premises violates the restrictive covenant in the lease.

Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. "In order to obtain a preliminary injunction, the plaintiff must show by clear and convincing evidence that it is likely to succeed on the merits of the action, that it will suffer irreparable injury absent the injunction, and that the balance of the equities is in its favor *(see, Aetna Ins. Co. v Capasso,*75 NY2d 860; *Grant Co. v Srogi,*52 NY2d 496, 517)” *(Key Drug Co. v Luna Park Realty Assocs.,*221 AD2d 598, 599). We agree with the court that plaintiff has not met the first requirement because it failed to establish its clear right to the ultimate relief sought *(see, Little India Stores v Singh,*101 AD2d 727, 728; *City of Buffalo v Mangan, 49*AD2d 697). "[T]he policy of the law is to favor the free and unobstructed use of realty *(Premium Point Park Assn. v Polar Bar,*306 NY 507) and * * * covenants restricting the use of property will be strictly construed against those seeking to enforce them *(Buffalo Academy of Sacred Heart v Boehm Bros.,*267 NY 242)” *(Huggins v Castle Estates,*36 NY2d 427, 430; *see, Sunrise Plaza Assocs. v International Summit Equities Corp.,*152 AD2d 561, *lv denied*75 NY2d 703; *Thrun v Stromberg,*136 AD2d 543, 544).

The court erred, however, in granting defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The proof submitted by plaintiff raises a triable issue of fact whether the bar at the proposed business is to be operated "as an incident to its restaurant food service business.” We *913therefore modify the order and judgment by denying defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment and reinstating the complaint and by vacating the award of costs and disbursements. (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present— Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ. [As amended by unpublished order entered April 25, 1997.]
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00047

- CV

Ramon Ruiz

v.

Selene Peregrino Ruiz §

§

§

§ From the 211th District Court

o f Denton County (201 2

- 30679

- 211 )

September 4 , 2014

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial cour t is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant Ramon Ruiz shall pay all of the costs of

this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

C hief Justice Terrie Livingston
#### PEPSI-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF TAMPA, INC., a corporation, Appellant, v. Christopher TINIUS, a minor, et al., Appellees.

No. 70-271.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 13, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2022095EN.01000701.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 5 October 2021 — Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej v Gmina L.

(Case C-616/21)

(2022/C 95/11)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej

Respondent: Gmina L.

Question referred

Must the provisions of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, (1) in particular Articles 2(1), 9(1) and 13(1) of that directive, be interpreted as meaning that a municipality (a public authority) is to be regarded as a taxable person for VAT purposes in respect of the implementation of a programme for the removal of asbestos from properties located within that municipality which are owned by residents who do not incur any expense in that regard? Or is the implementation of such a programme included in the activities of the municipality as a public authority which are undertaken in order to fulfil its tasks of protecting the health and life of its residents and protecting the environment, in which connection the municipality is not regarded as a taxable person for VAT purposes?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

---
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 371

Requesting the President to designate April 1994 as ‘‘National Savings

Month’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1994

Mr. LAROCCO submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

RESOLUTION

Requesting the President to designate April 1994 as

‘‘National Savings Month’’.

Whereas the United States cannot prosper without the savings and investment of our people;

Whereas American savings amounted to more than 6 percent

of our Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 1981, but

equaled less than 3.5 percent of GDP last year;

Whereas our failure to save means that the United States has

to borrow money abroad;

Whereas the United States has become a debtor nation, importing more than $500,000,000,000 from other countries in the past year in contrast to a net export position

of nearly $400,000,000,000 in 1980;
2

HRES 371 IH

Whereas productivity cannot grow and our standard of living

cannot rise without adequate domestic savings; and

Whereas it is incumbent upon us, for the future well-being

of our Nation, to bring these facts to the attention of the

American people: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the President is hereby authorized and

2 requested to issue a proclamation drawing attention to the

3 importance of savings and investment in America and des4 ignating the month beginning on April 1, 1994, as ‘‘Na5 tional Savings Week’’.

Æ
# • 2124/92

. SPA 9 RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 71: Mining Waste Exclusion II (oontd)
STATE ANALOG IS: FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION EQUIVALENT MORESTRINGENT BROADERIN SCOPE 2124/92 RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 71 Mining Waste Exclusion II 55 FR 2322-2354 January 23, 1990 (Non-HSWA Cluster VI)

Note: This isthe second revision tothe mining waste exclusion. The first occurred at 54 FR 36592 (September 1, 1989) and is addressed by Revision Checklist 65.

FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION WAC 173·303- STATE ANALOG IS: MORE EQUIV- STRINALENT GENT BROADERIN SCOPE

PART 260 • HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL WAC 173-303
SUBPART B- DEFINITIONS
DEFINITIONS 1 revise 'designated

facilitv" 260.10 

### 040 

# x PART 261 -IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
SUBPART A- GENERAL
EXCLUSIONS "§261.4(b)(7)· replaces ·this paragraph" twice; 'roasting, autoclaving, and/or chlorination" replaces "roasting"; insert "(and/or autoclaving and/or chlorination)" after "roasting' within existing parenthetical clause; semi-colons replace a number of . commas; significant

. revisions to last sentence which introduces listofwastes 261.41b)(7) noanalog 

### X 261.4Ib)17)(i) noanalog 

### X
January 23, 1990
- Page 1of2

# C 2124/92 SPA 9 RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 

### 71: Mining Waste Exclusion II (confd)
STATE ANALOG IS: FEDERAL ANALOGOUS MORE BROAD· FEDERAL RCRA STATE EQUIV· STRIN- ERIN REQUIREMENT CITATION CITATION ALENT GENT SCOPE 261.4(b)(7)(ji) noanalog X 261.4(b)(7)(iii) noanalog X 261.4(b)(7)(jv) noanalog X 261.4(b)(7)(v) noanalog X 261.4(b)(7)(vi) noanalog X 261.4(b)(7)(vii) noanalog X 261.4(b)(7)(viii) no analog X 261.4(b)(7)(jx) noanalog X 261.4(b)(7)(x) noanalog X 261.4(b)(7)(xi) no analog X 261.4(b)(7)(xii) noanalog X 261.4(b)(7)(xiii) noanalog X

# C~ 261.4(b)(7)(xiv) noanalog X 261.4(b)(7)(xv) noanalog X revisions tolistof excluded wastes; 261.4(b)(7)(xvi) noanalog X (i)(A)-(E) and (ii)(A)-(T) are replaced 261.4(b)(7)(xvii) noanalog X by(i)-(xx), with deletion offive 261.4(b)(7)(xviii) noanalog X conditionally retained wastes and some 261.4(b)(7)(xix) noanalog X revisions 'in wording forretained wastes 261.4(b)(7)(xx) no analog X PART 262
- STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO GENERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
SUBPART B- THE MANIFEST
USE OF THE MANIFEST add new paragraph stating requirements when shipping hazardous waste toa designated facility in anauthorized State which has-not yet January 23, 1990 • Page 2of2

# • 2/24/92 SPA 9 RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 71: Mining Waste Exclusion II (confd)
STATE ANALOG IS: FEDERAL ANALOGOUS MORE BROADFEDERAL RCRA STATE EQUIV- STRIN- ERIN REQUIREMENT CITATION CITATION ALENT GENT SCOPE obtained authorization to regulate that particular waste as
. hazardous 262.23(el 180(3l(f) 

# x Note that this definition inthe Federal Register (55 FR 2353, January 23,1990) and**i~** 

### the july 1,1990 CFR contains atypographical error. The reference to260.20 should be 262.20


# •

• January 23, 1990
- Page 3of2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             2,655
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         21
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                        5,541
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  11,101
<PP&E>                                            20,860
<DEPRECIATION>                                       803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    39,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              5,018
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            1
<COMMON>                                              15
<OTHER-SE>                                        12,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      39,896
<SALES>                                           44,452
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  44,452
<CGS>                                             27,079
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     27,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    7,368
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                7,368
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                       7,368
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .49
        


</TABLE>