alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.30


 


AMENDMENT
TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment (the “Amendment”) dated and effective on December 14, 2020 is by and between MJ Holdings, Inc. a
Nevada corporation whose address is 1300 South Jones Blvd, Suite 104, Las Vegas, NV 89146 (the “Company”) and Sylios
Corp (the “Consultant”), a Florida corporation whose address is 501 1st Ave N., Suite 900, St. Petersburg,
FL 33701, (individually, a “Party”; collectively, the “Parties”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS,
on August 25, 2020, the Company and Consultant entered into a Consulting Agreement (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and Consultant have agreed to modify the Compensation to the Consultant (section 5 of the Agreement).


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the Parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


	 	1.	Consultant
    shall receive a total of $10,000 cash compensation and 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of the date
    of this Amendment, the Consultant has received all cash compensation.


 


IN
WITNESS, WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed, all as of the day and year first above written.


 


	COMPANY:	 	CONSULTANT:
	 	 	 
	MJ
    HOLDINGS, INC.	 	SYLIOS
    CORP
	1300
    South Jones Blvd, Suite 104	 	501
    First Ave N, Suite 901
	Las
    Vegas, NV 89146	 	St.
    Petersburg, FL 33701
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	By:
    	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Roger
    J. Bloss	 	Jimmy
    Wayne Anderson
	Its:
    	Interim
    Chief Executive Officer	 	Its:
    	President
	Date:
    	December
    14, 2020	 	Dated:
    	December
    14, 2020
GPO Home
                Inspector General
                
            Report Fraud, Waste and Abuse
            
        
            Overview
            
        
            OIG Leadership
            
        
            Investigations
            
        
            Audits
            
        
            Inspections
            
        
            Semiannual Reports to Congress
            
        
            Plans and Reports
            
        
            Recommendations
            
        
            Whistleblower Protection Program
            
        
            FAQs about the OIG
            
        
            Complaint Form 
  GPO Home Inspector General
 Report Fraud, Waste and Abuse
                        
                    
                        Overview
                        
                    
                        OIG Leadership
                        
                    
                        Investigations
                        
                    
                        Audits
                        
                    
                        Inspections
                        
                    
                        Semiannual Reports to Congress
                        
                    
                        Plans and Reports
                        
                    
                        Recommendations
                        
                    
                        Whistleblower Protection Program
                        
                    
                        FAQs about the OIG
 Stay Informed - New OIG Reports Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Audits The Audits Division helps improve the management of GPO programs and activities by providing timely, balanced, credible, and independent financial and financially-related audits that address the economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of GPO operations. Audit reports identify opportunities for enhancing management of program operations and provides GPO with constructive recommendations to improve its services. OIG audits are performed in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.
 Government Publishing Office Telework Program 
March 15, 2024
 Payments to Employees Covered by the FECA 
June 5, 2023
 Management and Use of Official Time 
March 20, 2023
  Management Letter - Non-Information Technology

September 30, 2023
 GPO FY2023 Annual Report

September 30, 2023/2022
 Archives
 Fiscal Year 2023Fiscal Year 2022Fiscal Year 2021Fiscal Year 2020Fiscal Year 2019Fiscal Year 2018Fiscal Year 2017Fiscal Year 2016Fiscal Year 2015Fiscal Year 2014Fiscal Year 2013Fiscal Year 2012Fiscal Year 2011Fiscal Year 2010Fiscal Year 2009Fiscal Year 2008Fiscal Year 2007Fiscal Year 2006Fiscal Year 2005Fiscal Year 2004
 Facebook
    **
    Twitter
    **
    Instagram
    **
    You Tube
    **
    Pinterest
    **
    Linkedin
    **U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE
Accessibility | Privacy | COOP  | Inspector General
No. 11110.

#### Anderson et al. *v.*The City of Cleveland et al.

Decided December 15, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. Charles W. Poland*and *Mr. P. H. Kaiser,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Newton D. Baker,*city solicitor; *Mr. E. K. Wilcox*and *Mr. John .H. Clarke,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23


<PAGE>


[Logo]
NEFF & RICCI
-----------------------
                    LLP




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


Board of Directors
GFSB Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
333-07131) on Form S-8 of GFSB Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated August 3, 2000,
relating to the consolidated  statement of financial  condition of GFSB Bancorp,
Inc. as of June 30, 2000,  and the related  consolidated  statements of earnings
and comprehensive  earnings,  changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for
the years ending June 30, 2000 and 1999,  which  report  appears in the June 30,
2000 annual report on Form 10-KSB of GFSB Bancorp, Inc.

/s/ NEFF & RICCI LLP
-----------------------
September 25, 2000
Albuquerque, New Mexico



                   CONSULTANTS & CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                 7001 Prospect Lace, NE * Albuquerque, NM 87110
            (505) 883-6612 * Fax (505) 830-6282 * e-mail: neff@nm.net
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 907

To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate the effect of the parental

exception to the kidnaping prohibition in cases of kidnapings in violation

of valid custody orders.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 16, 1993

Mr. OWENS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate the

effect of the parental exception to the kidnaping prohibition in cases of kidnapings in violation of valid custody

orders.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 1201(a) of title 18, United States Code, is

4 amended by inserting ‘‘(unless such parent’s custody of

5 such minor at the time of the conduct constituting the

6 offense is in violation of a court order or decree)’’ after

7 ‘‘except in the case of a minor by the parent thereof’’.

Æ
#### John LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-777.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 5, 1971.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Humes T. Lasher, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
732 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC 20401-0001

Jacket: ____________________ Program: _________________________ Print Order: _______________________ 

Quality Assurance Random Copies – Sampling/Shipping Instructions

Dear Contractor:

As indicated in the specifications, you are requested to provide Random Copies on this order.

Use the following sampling plan and shipping instructions for selecting and shipping these copies, 

which will be inspected against the attributes specified in the contract.

These copies are different from, and do not take the place of, the Departmental Random 

(blue label) Copies, if required. See the specifications for instructions regarding Departmental 

Random Copies.

1. Divide the entire lot into equal sub lots, (see table).

2. Select 1 copy (QARC) from each sub lot, (see table).

Do not choose copies from the same general

area in each sub lot.

3. Sign and date the attached “Certificate of Selection

of Random Copies” (GPO Form 917 R12/15) and

include it with the Random Copies.

4. Include in the package a copy of the Purchase Order and Specifications for Small Purchase

and Formal Bids, or a copy of the Print Order and contract specifications for Term Contracts as

applicable.

5. Use the attached business reply yellow label (GPO Form 915) to mail the Random Copies

to the Quality Control For Published Products Section.

Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated.

Sincerely,

Rob Coates

Manager

PSS, Quality Control for Published Products

Attachments

GPO Form 2686 (revised 5/16) 

Quality Assurance Random Copy (QARC)

Sampling Plan

Quantity No. of Sub lots / QARC’s

500 thru 3200 13

3,201 thru 10,000 20

10,001 thru 35,000 32

35,001 and over 50
#### PAN AMERICAN TIRE COMPANY, Appellant, v. GOLD COAST EQUIPMENT CO., INC., Appellee.

No. 74-284.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 6, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                   LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF ACT NETWORKS, INC.

ACT Networks (BNS), Inc., a Delaware corporation
ACT Networks, Inc. - Wireless Networks Systems, a Delaware corporation
ACT Networks (Canada), Inc., a Canadian corporation
ACT Networks do Brasil, LTD, a Brazil limited company
ACT Networks (Asia) LTD, a limited company incorporated in China
ACT Networks (1997), FSC, a foreign sales corporation incorporated in Barbados
ACT Networks (Europe) LTD, a limited company incorporated in the United Kingdom
ACT Networks PTY LTD, an Australian limited company
3174697 Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation



                                       38
#### Jack Donald JONES and Donald Wayne Guy, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. S-222, S-263.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 7, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32079-32080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14609]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-520-803]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From the United 
Arab Emirates: Notice of Correction to Partial Rescission of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.


DATES: Applicable July 11, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Huston, Office VII, Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4261.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  On June 18, 2018, the Department of 
Commerce (Commerce) published a notice to rescind the antidumping 
administrative review for Flex Middle East FZE (Flex) covering the 
period November 1, 2016 through October 31, 2017.\1\ The Partial 
Rescission Notice contained an inadvertent error in the assessment

[[Page 32080]]

section of the notice, specifically the Partial Rescission Notice did 
not cite the correct period for which Commerce will instruct U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties. The 
corrected assessment section appears below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip from 
the United Arab Emirates: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 83 FR 28196 (June 18, 2018) 
(Partial Rescission Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    Commerce will instruct U.S. CBP to assess anti-dumping duties on 
all appropriate entries. Subject merchandise of Flex will be assessed 
antidumping duties at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated 
antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 
warehouse, for consumption, during the period November 1, 2016, through 
October 31, 2017, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce 
intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date 
of publication of this notice.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 
CFR 351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: June 29, 2018.
Scot Fullerton,
Director, Office VI, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2018-14609 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Michael, 

Mike Sharkey <msharkey@hamilton.net> 

Tuesday, January 27, 2015 12:33 PM 

Martin, Michael (OST) 

EAS Decision Extension 

North Platte Airport Authority would like to request a decision extension regarding our communities' EAS air carrier 

recommendation until 28 February 2015. This will give us time to see how ADI's appeal and apparent reapplication 

process is going. In the meantime please hold Great Lakes in. 

Your assistance in this matter is very much appreciated. We can only guess how stressful this whole process must be for 

you and Kevin. 

Best regards, 

Mike Sharkey 

Airport Manager 

1
#### Janice M. KENNEDY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-879.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 1, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
----

----

|                                                      | Jurisdiction      of | Status      at |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|----------------|
| Name                                                      | Incorporation        | June 27, 2010  |
| Magnetek      Mondel Holding, Inc. (1)                    | Delaware             | Active         |
| Magnetek      Alternative Energy, Inc. (1)                | Delaware             | Active         |
| Magnetek      (U.K.) Limited (1)                          | England              | Active         |
| Mondel      ULC (3)                                       | Canada               | Active         |
| Magnetek      National Electric Coil, Inc. (1)            | Delaware             | Inactive       |
| Magnetek      de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (2)                 | Mexico               | Inactive       |
| Manufacturas      Electricas de Reynosa, S.A. de C.V. (2) | Mexico               | Inactive       |
| Mejor      Electronica de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (2)         | Mexico               | Inactive       |
| Servicio      de Guarderas, S.C. (2)                      | Mexico               | Inactive       |

|   | (1) | 100%      owned by Magnetek, Inc. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------|

|   | (2) | 99%      owned by Magnetek, Inc. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------|

|   | (3) | 100%      owned by Magnetek Mondel Holding,Inc. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------|

----

----
#### Townsend vs. Wells.

The agent, who pays the taxes upon land for the owner, is a competent witness to prove the payment, on a petition for confirmation by a purchaser of the land at tax sale.

*Appeal from Drew Circuit Cou't in Chancery.*

Hon. J. C. Murray, Circuit Judge.

Winter, for appellant.

Garland *&*Randolph, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Fairchild

delivered the opinion of the court.

To a petition for confirmation of a tax title to several tracts of land, brought by Wells on the chancery side of the Drew circuit court, Townsend obtained leave to appear, and contest the tax sale of one of the pieces of land, and filed an answer setting up the fact that no taxes were due to the State on that piece of land, as the respondent, the owner of the land, paid them on the day that the land was advertised to be sold, before the hour of sale. The answer is formal, stating the main fact of defense so as to be a bar to the confirmation of the sale of the piece of land mentioned in it; and upon the hearing the respondent offered to prove the fact, and every allegation of the answer in denial of the petition, by the written statement of John S. Winter, which, by consent, was to be received as formal proof, if competent testimony.

The bill of exceptions runs thus: “ Which statement, on motion of the petitioner’s solicitor, was suppressed by the court on *582account of the interest of the witness arising out of his former relations with respondent, as stated in his statement.” There was no former relation between Winter and the respondent mentioned in the statement, but that Winter paid the taxes on respondent’s lands in Drew county the year that this land in controversy was sold to petitioner, and also in 1852, the year afterwards, and that he was paid for so doing.

Out of this relation no interest arose to exclude Winter’s statement. He was a competent witness for all that relation; and if the court had rebuked the petitioner’s solicitors for interposing a frivolous objection to the *competency of*the *testimony,*we should have approved its course. But as the court sustained the objection, and the respondent had no other witness by whom to establish his defense, we reverse the decree, and remand the case for further proceedings according to law.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 28653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13265]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of IPERT Applications.
    Date: July 26, 2018.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Washington Marriott at Metro Center, 775 12th Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20005.
    Contact Person: Lisa A. Dunbar, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General 
Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, 
Room 3AN12, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2849, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2347564d4142514f634e424a4f0d4d4a4b0d444c55"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1a7e6f74787b68765a777b737634747372347d756c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives; 93.859, Biomedical Research and 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 14, 2018.
David D. Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-13265 Filed 6-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Emerging and sustainable technology program details

GSA will use $975 million in Inflation Reduction Act funding to upgrade federal buildings across the country with emerging and sustainable technologies.

By leveraging Inflation Reduction Act funds, GSA expects to more than double the $975 million investment in sustainable technologies, deploying a total of $1.9 billion in private and public funding to support sustainable technologies.

This investment will avoid 2.3 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions over the equipment’s lifetime and will save enough energy to power over 300,000 American homes. At the same time, it will boost the American economy by supporting 5,000 jobs per year, adding $2.4 billion to U.S. GDP and avoiding $467 million in energy costs for American taxpayers over the next two decades.

The Inflation Reduction Act funds will impact about 40 million square feet — about 20% — of the GSA federal buildings portfolio and expand the agency’s sustainable building portfolio to 134 million square feet. Through these projects, 28 buildings will achieve net zero emissions and 100 more buildings will become all-electric (in addition to the approximately 200 that are already all-electric).

Print PageEmail Page

Top

-  Inflation Reduction Act-  Overview 
-  IRA clean construction projects 
-  E&ST program details 
-  HPGB program details 
-  LEC program details