alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 32190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14781]



[[Page 32190]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Notice of Meeting

    Agency: United States Institute of Peace.
    Date/Time: Friday, July 20, 2018 (10:00 a.m.-12:15 p.m.)
    Location: 2301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20037.
    Status: Open Session--Portions may be closed pursuant to Subsection 
(c) of Section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in 
subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, 
Public Law 98-525.
    Agenda: July 20, 2018 Board Meeting: Chairman's Report; Vice 
Chairman's Report; President's Report; Approval of Minutes of the One 
Hundred and Sixty Sixth Meeting (April 20, 2018) of the Board of 
Directors; North Africa Update, Reports from USIP Board Committees; and 
Emerging Security Competition in the Red Sea report.
    Contact: William B. Taylor, Executive Vice President: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94e3e0f5edf8fbe6d4e1e7fde4bafbe6f3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c8bfbca9b1a4a7ba88bdbba1b8e6a7baaf">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: July 5, 2018.
William B. Taylor,
Executive Vice President.
[FR Doc. 2018-14781 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6820-AR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Security Overview

The Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Federal Protective Service (FPS) provides law enforcement and security services such as contract security guards and crime prevention seminars to federally owned and leased facilities. 

The FPS installs and monitors:
                        - Alarm systems 
                        - X-Rays 
                        - Magnetometers
                        - Entry control systems

## Code Adam Alert Program

The Code Adam Act of 2003 [PDF - 857 KB] requires the designated authority for a public federally owned or leased building to establish procedures for a missing child. For more information, view the Code Adam Alert Program slide show [PPT - 874 KB] or the Code Adam page of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC).

## Truck Security Clearance for Deliveries to GS Building

Trucks that deliver materials to GSA’s central office building (1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC) must obtain security clearance from the DHS/FPS Mobile Scanning Unit.

### Inspection Procedure:

                        - When you arrive at the FPS Mobile Scanning Facility (1880 Second Street, SW Washington, DC 20024), present your freight delivery form and driver’s license at the gate.
                        - The guard will check paperwork and direct you to the scanning area.
                        - Truck will be x-rayed and sealed.

### Hours of Operation:

5:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. Monday–Friday5:00 a.m.–1:00 p.m. Saturday 

Print PageEmail Page

Top

-  Facilities Management-  Overview 
-  Facilities Operations 
-  Facility Risk Management 
-  Missing Child Notice Program 
-  Security 
-  Utility Services 
-  Water Quality Management
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00795-CR

Domingo Hernandez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 427TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-08-900236, HONORABLE MELISSA YOUNG GOODWIN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was due June 15, 2009. The brief has not been received and

appellant’s appointed attorney, Leonard Martinez, did not respond to this Court’s notice that the brief

is overdue.

The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether the attorney it appointed to represent

appellant has abandoned the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make appropriate

findings and recommendations. If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who will

effectively represent appellant in this cause. A record from this hearing, including copies of all

findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, shall be forwarded to the Clerk

of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than October 2, 2009. Rule 38.8(b)(3).
2

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson

Abated

Filed: August 31, 2009

Do Not Publish
# L_2009045EN.01S00301.xml

| 14.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 45/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 45/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided to no longer quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                      METROMEDIA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                   THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2001 AND 2000

                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                2001       2000
                                                              --------   --------
<S>                                                           <C>        <C>
Loss per common share--Basic (A):
  Net loss..................................................  $(23,970)  $(16,531)
  Cumulative convertible preferred stock dividend
    requirement.............................................    (3,752)    (3,752)
                                                              --------   --------
  Net loss attributable to common stockholders..............  $(27,722)  $(20,283)
                                                              ========   ========
Weighted average common stock shares outstanding during the
  period....................................................    94,035     93,807
                                                              ========   ========
Loss per common share--Basic:
  Net loss attributable to common stockholders..............  $  (0.29)  $  (0.22)
                                                              ========   ========
</TABLE>

------------------------

(A) In calculating diluted earnings per share, no potential shares of common
    stock are to be included in the computation of diluted earnings per share
    when a loss from continuing operations available to common stockholders
    exists. For the three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000, the Company had
    a loss from continuing operations.
Exhibit 10.30   Summary of Director and Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements  In addition to the compensation arrangements filed as other exhibits to this annual report, Alliance One International, Inc. (the Company) has the following compensation arrangements with its directors and named executive officers.  Compensation Arrangements for Directors  Directors who are employees of the Company or its subsidiaries or who serve as paid consultants to the Company are not compensated for their services as director.   Non-employee directors receive an annual cash retainer paid in quarterly installments.  As of June 1, 2011, such retainer payments were based on the following schedule:  Type of ServiceAnnual RetainerBoard Member$50,000Audit Committee Chair+ $10,000Executive Compensation Committee Chair+ $  7,500Executive Committee Chair+ $  5,000Governance & Nominating Committee Chair+ $  5,000Audit Committee Member+ $12,000Executive Compensation Committee Member+ $12,000Executive Committee Member+ $  3,000Governance & Nominating Committee Member+ $  7,500Lead Independent Director+ $10,000  Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive Officers  The board of directors sets the annual base salary for each of the Companys chief executive officer, chief financial officer and its three other most highly compensated executive officers, based on fiscal 2011 total compensation (such five officers, the named executive officers), subject to minimum annual salary rates of Henry C. Babb, Jr. as set forth in his employment agreement.  As of June 1, 2011, the annual base salary rates for the named executive officers were as follows:  Named Executive OfficerBase SalaryMark W. Kehaya (1)$520,500Robert A. Sheets375,000J. Pieter Sikkel375,000Henry C. Babb, Jr.314,000J. Henry Denny310,000  (1)Mr. Kehaya was named Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer effective December 14, 2010.  In connection with Mr. Kehayas service as Interim Chief Executive Officer, the Company has entered into a consulting agreement with Meriturn Partners, LLC and Mr. Kehaya as a consultant and interim Chief Executive Officer.  Mr. Kehaya is a partner with Meriturn.  Per the consulting agreement, the Company has agreed to pay Meriturn $45,375 per month for Mr. Kehayas services.
July 2012

Dear Guaranty Agency Director:

As you are aware, under the Secretary’s general oversight authority, we asked each Guaranty 

Agency to provide to us, on a monthly basis, a report of the status of the agency’s Federal and 

Operating funds established pursuant to requirements of the Higher Education Act and the 

Department’s regulations. This increased monitoring would allow the Department to identify

areas of concern and to inform of oversight and technical assistance activities. 

Upon review of the 2011 fiscal year data received, we have determined that we would like a 

detailed breakdown of specific data elements. For the 2013 fiscal year, the Department is now 

requesting detailed explanations for the following line items: MD-20, MD-36 (Other Revenues), 

MD-25, MD-39 (Other Expenses), MD-51 (Accounts Receivable from ED), and MD-54 

(Accounts Payable to ED). To guide you in this reporting requirement, we have added additional 

tabs to the monthly annual spreadsheet template that you currently send to us by the 20th of each 

month. Please be sure to update your records and utilize the new template beginning with your 

October 2012 monthly submission.

This modified procedure is to ensure that we are also gathering the guaranty agency data in a 

uniform manner. The updated template now requires that you key in the specified data elements 

mentioned above on their respective tabs. You will continue to see the original template that will 

show the calculated balances of the Federal and Operating Funds, in addition to the Balance 

Sheet section.

As a reminder, the monthly spreadsheets must be submitted to the Department as an attachment 

to the Monthly.Report @ed.gov email address no later than 45 days following the end of the 

month being reported. Please note that there is no change to the current reporting 

requirements—the due date is still the 20th of the month. The “Subject Line” of the email should 

indicate “GA Monthly Fund Report – <name of month>”. The body of the email message must 

include the name of the agency and the name, phone number, and email address of an agency

staff member who we can contact in the event we have questions on the content of the report. If 

appropriate, the agency may include notes and comments that the agency would like the 

Department to consider as we review the data on the report.
Page 2 - Guaranty Agency Director

We appreciate your cooperation. If you have any questions on this reporting requirement, please 

contact the Monthly Reporting Team via email at monthly.report@ed.gov.

Sincerely,

Katrina Turner

Director, Operations Performance Division

Business Operations

Attachment: Reporting Excel Spreadsheet
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0518 SAT Date: 5/6/2014 Print Date: 6/4/2014

Related cases : Health related cases: Ecotox related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 3 Health: ; Eco: chronic concerns only

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 1 1 PMN 1 1 1 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; PMN negl; Keywords : Keywords: IRRIT - E, S, L; AQUATOX Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0518 FATE: Liquid with MP < 0 C (M) log Kow = 5.46 (E); S = 0.045 mg/L/reacts slowly at 25 C (E) Hydrolysis half-life = days VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 8.61 (E)log Fish BCF = 1.90 (E) log Fish BAF = 3.10 (E) POTW removal (%) = PMN 90 via sorption and possible partial biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = PMN mo Sorption to soils/sediments = PMN v.strong PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt methyl 3-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy] p ropyl silanediol. P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = PMN negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes based on physical/chemical p roperties. Concerns are irritation of the eyes, skin and respiratory tract based on solvent irritation and MSDS information. There are also concerns for liver toxicity based on the alkyl silane moiety. Concern level is low - moderate.

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value 0.081 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.10
algal

_ chronic value *
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals; SAR chemical class = siloxane; MW 881; log Kow = 5.46 (EPI); liquid with mp < 0 C (M); S = 0.046 mg/L at 20 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 8

SARs neutral organic chemicals SAR Class siloxane Ecotox Category N eutral Organics
Ecotox Factors Comments:SAT Chair: Doritza Pagan-Rodriguez
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                    Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



     I, Christopher M. Rasmussen, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer), certify that this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained herein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Gateway Energy Corporation and
its subsidiaries for the periods presented.


Date:  November 14, 2008                    /s/  Christopher M. Rasmussen
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Christopher M. Rasmussen
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 (Principal Accounting Officer)
#### CHARLES TUNNEL and WILLIAM A. SHORT *vs.*EBENEZER PETTIJOHN.

To charge a person as a common carrier, it must be shown that the usage of his business includes the goods carried, or that there was a special conti act to carry them.

In case of a change of goods from one carrier to another, when is the delivery complete. Quere.

Capias Case.

The plaintiff declared on an undertaking by the defendant to carry for hire and deliver to him certain goods, &c., to wit: one hogshead of molasses of the value of fifty dollars, which said hogshead of molasses was not delivered according to his said undertaking, but for want of proper care and attention was lost and destroyed. Plea,- not guilty.

The proof established that defendant was in the habit of hauling for hire, goods landed at Milton, belonging to merchants in Georgetown; but one of these merchants testified, that the defendant had refused to carry molasses for him on account of its bulk and weight, and that he had never known him to carry molasses. The hogshead in question was brought from Philadelphia, for Tunnel and Short, by captain Parker, and delivered on the wharf at Milton ; when, defendant’s cart being there, it was placed by Parker’s hands and defendant’s servant in his cart. While placing it, the hogshead rolled and fell from the cart, and the contents were spilled upon the ground and lost.

*Layton*for defendant,

moved a nonsuit—

1st. Because it was not proved that the defendant was a common carrier, at least of this kind of goods, nor was there any special undertaking, as the act of the servant in assisting to place the hogshead in the cart, being out of his usual course of employment, would not bind the master; and

2d. That there was no proof of a delivery to the defendant. His liability would not ^mrnence until there was a complete delivery to him, and the articjg was here lost and destroy ed whilst in thé act of delivery.^ ^

*The Court*

said, to enable the plaintiff to recover, he must prove either a special contract and undertaking by the defendant to carry this hogshead of molasses, or a general usage; that is, that the defendant was a common carrier of goods, including goods of this description. M. general usage to carry goods other than molasses is proved in this case ; but so far as there is proof of usage, it is against the idea of the defendant’s general undertaking to carry molasses. And there seems to be good reason for distinguishing between this *49and other kinds of goods, on account of its bulk and weight, and it also appears that the defendant’s cart is too small for such freight.

*Wootten*for plaintiff.

*Layton*for defendant.

The other is a more difficult question, as to when the defendant’s liability commenced, supposing him to be liable. Was the delivery to him complete, by showing him the hogshead on the wharf, or was the captain of the vessel bound to place it in the cart. But the point is unnecessary, as we are of opinion that the defendant is not liable, under the proof in the case, on the other ground.

Nonsuit ordered.
Order entered November 23, 2015 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01376-CV 

IN RE BRET DAVID FOREMAN 

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 429-51023-2014 

ORDER 

Before Justices Francis, Myers, and Schenck 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator Bret David Foreman’s 

petition for writ of habeas corpus. We GRANT the motion for withdrawal of counsel filed by 

relator’s attorney, Vale Krenik. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding. 

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

 JUSTICE
#### Jacob AVIROM, Appellant, v. Margaret L. GREENBERG, Appellee.

No. 73-1336.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 6, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 184 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58539-58540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23354]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9005-2]

Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 09/10/2012 Through 09/14/2012
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Starting October 1, 2012, EPA will not 
accept paper copies or CDs of EISs for filing purposes; all submissions 
on or after October 1, 2012 must be made through e-NEPA.
    While this system eliminates the need to submit paper or CD copies 
to EPA to meet filing requirements, electronic submission does not 
change requirements for distribution of EISs for public review and 
comment. To begin using e-NEPA, you must first register with EPA's 
electronic reporting site--https://cdx.epa.gov/epa_home.asp

EIS No. 20120302, Final EIS, HUD, CA, Alice Griffith Redevelopment 
Project, Redevelopment of the 4-Arce ``Project Site'' for 
1,200 New Dwelling Units, Retail Development, Open Space and Associated 
Infrastructure, City and County of San Francisco, CA, Review Period 
Ends: 10/22/2012, Contact: Eugene Flannery 415-701-5598.
EIS No. 20120303, Draft EIS, DOE, TX, W.A. Parish Post-Combustion CO2 
Capture and Sequestration Project, Funding, Fort Bend, Wharton, and 
Jackson Counties, TX, Comment Period Ends: 11/05/2012, Contact: Mark J. 
Matarrese 202-586-0491.
EIS No. 20120304, Final EIS, USFS, 00, Mountain Pine Beetle Response 
Project, Implementing Multiple Resource Management Activities, Black 
Hills National Forest, Custer, Fall River, Lawrence, Meade, and 
Pennington Counties, SD and Crook and Weston Counties, WY, Review 
Period Ends: 10/22/2012, Contact: Katie Van Alstyne 605-343-1567.

[[Page 58540]]

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20110108, Draft EIS, USFS, OR, WITHDRAWAL- Kapka Butte Sno-Park 
Project, Proposal to Build a New Sno-Park to Provide more High-
Elevation Parking for Winter Recreationist, Bend-Ft. Rock Ranger 
District, Deschutes National Forest, Deschutes County, OR, Comment 
Period Ends: 06/30/2011, Contact: Beth Peer 541-383-4769. Revision to 
FR Notice Published 06/03/2011; Officially Withdrawn by the Preparing 
Agency

    Dated: September 19, 2012.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2012-23354 Filed 9-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Hedges, Controller and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 10, 2009



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ David A. Hedges                       
|                                          
|David A. Hedges                           
|VP, Controller and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 Date: May 3, 2006
    
    /s/Jeffrey S. GormanJeffrey S. GormanPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/Robert E. KirkendallRobert E. KirkendallSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
  17