Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2020
                              Paul L. Grazia, DAB CR5773 (2020)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Paul L. Grazia, DAB CR5773 (2020)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Paul L. Grazia
(OI File No.: 1-18-40042-9),
Petitioner,

v.

The Inspector General.
Docket No. C-20-671Decision No. CR5773December 8, 2020

        
              
    

      DECISION

Petitioner, Paul L. Grazia, requested a hearing regarding the Inspector General’s (IG’s) determination to exclude him from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs under section 1128(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (Act).  Petitioner concedes that the IG has a basis to exclude him.  Petitioner’s sole argument is that he is eligible for a waiver of the exclusion pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 1001.1801.  The decision to grant or deny a waiver request is a matter of the IG’s discretion and is not subject to review by an administrative law judge.  42 C.F.R. § 1001.1801(a), (f).  Therefore, Petitioner’s hearing request does not raise any issue that is within my power to adjudicate.  Accordingly, I dismiss Petitioner’s hearing request as required by 42 C.F.R. § 1005.2(e)(4).

I.     Background and Procedural History

By letter dated June 30, 2020, the IG notified Petitioner that he was being excluded from Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs pursuant to section 1128(a)(1) of the Act.  IG Exhibit (Ex.) 1.  The IG explained that Petitioner was excluded based on his conviction in the United States District Court, District of Maine (federal district

**Page 2**

court), of a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or a State health care program, including performance of management or administrative services related to the delivery of items or services, under any such program.  *Id.*

Petitioner timely requested a hearing before an administrative law judge.  On August 25, 2020, I held a telephone prehearing conference, the substance of which is summarized in an Order and Schedule for Filing Briefs and Documentary Evidence (Order).  *See* 42 C.F.R. § 1005.8.  Among other things, I directed the parties to file short-form briefs.  Order ¶ 7.b.  In accordance with the Order, the IG filed a brief (IG Br.) and five exhibits (IG Exs. 1-5).  Additionally, the IG filed a reply brief (IG Reply).  Petitioner did not object to any of the IG’s proposed exhibits; therefore, I admit IG Exs. 1-5 into the record.  42 C.F.R. § 1005.8(c); Order ¶ 8; Civil Remedies Division Procedures § 14(e).

Petitioner filed a brief (P. Br.) and additional submissions, which he did not mark as exhibits.  *See*Docket Entries #14-#16 in DAB E-File.  While I have considered Petitioner’s submissions, they are not material to my decision.  Docket Entry #15 in DAB E‐File is a request to waive Petitioner’s exclusion.  Docket Entry #16 in DAB E‐File consists of a number of documents, including letters of recommendation from some of Petitioner’s professional colleagues.  Petitioner’s waiver request pertains to an issue that is not properly before me, as I explain below.  The letters of recommendation and other documents in Docket Entry #16 in DAB E-File appear to be intended to show that Petitioner is trustworthy and unlikely to offend again.  However, Petitioner has conceded that the IG has a basis to exclude him, and I lack authority to reduce Petitioner’s exclusion below the statutory minimum period of five years.  Act, § 1128(c)(3); 42 C.F.R. § 1001.102(a).

The parties agree that this case does not require an in-person hearing.  IG Br. at 8; P. Br. at 2.1
  I therefore decide this case based on the written record.

II.     Issues

Ordinarily, the issues to be decided in an IG exclusion case are whether the IG had a basis for excluding an individual and whether the length of the exclusion is unreasonable.   42 C.F.R. § 1001.2007(a)(1).  However, in the present case, Petitioner has conceded that the IG has a basis to exclude him.  *See*P. Br. at 2.  Therefore, the only issue is whether Petitioner’s request for relief is one that I may consider.

**Page 3**

III.     Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Analysis

***A.  The IG was required to exclude Petitioner from participation in Medicare and other federal health care programs because Petitioner was convicted of an offense described in section 1128(a)(1) of the Act.***2

Section 1128(a)(1) of the Act (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(1)) provides:

(a) Mandatory exclusion.

The Secretary shall exclude the following individuals and entities from participation in any Federal health care program (as defined in section 1128B(f)):

(1) Conviction of program-related crimes

Any individual or entity that has been convicted of a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under [Medicare] or under any State health care program.

The IG presented evidence that Petitioner pleaded guilty to one count of making false statements relating to health care matters in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1035.  IG Ex. 5 at 1.  The federal district court adjudicated Petitioner guilty and sentenced him to one year’s probation and to pay MaineCare3
 $2400.00 in restitution, among other things.  *Id.*at 1, 2, 5.  The IG offered evidence that the conduct for which Petitioner was convicted consisted of falsifying medical records to support claims for reimbursement from MaineCare.  IG Ex. 3.

Petitioner was convicted of a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under a state health care program, within the meaning of section 1128(a)(1).  An individual is “convicted” when, among other things, a court makes a finding of guilt against the individual or accepts the individual’s guilty plea.  Act, § 1128(i) (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(i)).  MaineCare is a state health care program.  42 C.F.R. § 1000.10 (definition of *State health care program*); *see also*IG Ex. 3 at 1.  Court-ordered restitution to a state Medicaid program establishes a rebuttable presumption that the underlying offense was related to the delivery of an item or service under the program.  *See, e.g.*, *Johnnelle*

**Page 4**

*Johnson Bing*, DAB CR1938 at 6 (2009) (citing *Alexander Nepomuceno Jamias*, DAB CR1480 (2006)), *aff’d*, *Johnnelle Johnson Bing*, DAB No. 2251 (2009).  The IG is required to exclude an individual convicted of a program-related crime for a minimum period of five years.  Act, § 1128(c)(3); 42 C.F.R. § 1001.102(a).  Petitioner concedes that he was convicted of an offense for which exclusion is required.  P. Br. at 1-2.

Petitioner’s sole argument is that he qualifies for a waiver of his exclusion pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 1001.1801.  *Id.*at 3; *see also*Docket Entry #15 in DAB E-File.  However, as I discuss in the following section of this decision, the applicable regulations do not permit me to waive an exclusion imposed by the IG.

***B.  I dismiss Petitioner’s hearing request pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 1005.2(e)(4), because Petitioner has not raised any issue that I have authority to address.***

Petitioner argues that he is eligible for a waiver of the exclusion under 42 C.F.R. § 1001.1801 and should be allowed to participate in all capacities in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal health programs because he is the sole source of essential specialized services in the Portland, Maine community.  *See*Docket Entry #15 in DAB E-File.  As the IG correctly points out, only the administrator of a federal health care program is authorized to request a waiver.  *See*IG Reply at 2 (citing 42 C.F.R. § 1001.1801).  Excluded individuals or entities may not request a waiver directly.  *Id.*

Moreover, even if the request for waiver of Petitioner’s exclusion had come to me from the administrator of a federal health care program, I could not consider the request.  The applicable regulation delegates authority to the IG to grant or deny a waiver request.  42 C.F.R. § 1001.1801(a).  The regulation goes on to prohibit further administrative or judicial review of the IG’s action on a waiver request:  “The decision to grant, deny or rescind a request for a waiver is not subject to administrative or judicial review.”  42 C.F.R. § 1001.1801(f).  Accordingly, to the extent Petitioner is requesting that I grant him a waiver of his exclusion, I am without authority to grant the relief he seeks.

The regulation codified at 42 C.F.R. § 1005.2(e)(4) provides that an administrative law judge “will dismiss” a party’s hearing request if “[t]he petitioner’s . . . hearing request fails to raise any issue which may properly be addressed in a hearing.”  Therefore,

**Page 5**

because I have determined that the only issue which Petitioner raises is foreclosed from my review, I dismiss Petitioner’s hearing request.


          /s/
        Leslie A. Weyn

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. Petitioner’s brief is not paginated.  I refer to the PDF page numbers as they appear in the E-Filed document. back to note 1
                      2. My findings of fact/conclusions of law appear as headings in bold italic type. back to note 2
                      3. MaineCare is a program of the Maine Department of Health and Human Services that administers the Maine Medicaid program, among other things.  See IG Ex. 3 at 1. back to note 3 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back