alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
258 La. 917

#### RED BALL MOTOR FREIGHT, INC. v. LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.

No. 51489.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 11, 1971.

In re: Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. applying for writs of certiorari and mandamus.

Writ granted with stay order.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Lewis S. Doherty, III, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 17th day of June, 1971, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through its counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

It is further ordered that, in the meantime and until the further orders of this court, all proceedings against the relator in said Nineteenth Judicial District Court shall be stayed and suspended.

Appeal dismissed June 16, 1971, see 249 So.2d 200.
#### Barry Z. ROSE, Appellant, v. The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, Appellee.

Nos. 70-1284, 71-23.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 29, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 9, 1971.

Gustafson & Caldwell and Bryson K. Lovejoy, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellant.

Snyder, Young & Stern, and Joseph Teichman, No. Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

These appeals are from separate judgments in two proceedings each seeking distribution of income of a testamentary trust to a vested remainderman. The appeals were argued together. The trial court denied the claimed right to distribution and we affirm. See Mahan v. Lummus, 160 Fla. 505, 35 So.2d 725 (1948); Weed v. Knox, 157 Fla. 896, 27 So.2d 419 (1946).
# Frequently asked questions

Find answers to questions regarding asset management and GSA Public Buildings Service real property operations by selecting the links below.

**Real Property Asset Management FAQs** are contained on the Federal Real Property Profile reporting FAQs page and within the guidance documents on annual real property reporting located in the Federal Real Property Council library.

**Real Property Operational FAQS** can be found on the PBS Facility Management page.

**Have federal real property questions?**Ask the Real Property Team.

If you cannot access the form, you can email your questions to realpropertypolicy@gsa.gov.

Print PageEmail Page

Top

-  Real Property Policy Division overview-  Overview 
-  Asset Management 
-  Regulations Management 
-  Councils/Committees 
-  Data Collection and Reports 
-  Federal Meeting Facilities 
-  Training 
-  Library 
-  Frequently asked questions
Exhibit No. 99.1



Supplemental Segment Information





|In thousands                     | Three Months Ended
July 31,
|-------------------------------- | ---------------------------
|                                 | 2005                       
|Orders Received:                 |                            
|Sign Making & Specialty Graphics | $  69,262                  
|Apparel & Flexible Materials     | 43,239                     
|Ophthalmic Lens Processing       | 16,209                     
|                                 | $128,710                   
|                                 | =======                    
|                                 |                            
|                                 | July 31,2005               
|Backlog:                         |                            
|Sign Making & Specialty Graphics | $      565                 
|Apparel & Flexible Materials     | 39,453                     
|Ophthalmic Lens Processing       | 3,537                      
|                                 | $ 43,555                   
|                                 | =======
#### Lester GATES and Mallie Kaiser Jackson, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1052.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 13, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
OFFICE OF **THE** ATTORNEY GENERAL OF **TEXAS** AUSTIN

Bonorable Forrester I&mock Cr.%mhal DistriatAttorney uaxahaohle,Texan
DQer sir1 op~on No. o-3018 Bsr salary of CKnlnty
tullg considered by thin department, pue8t as followal

**“ Does**  **an Audl8or**  thmmnnd population twenty-reven

and derlvs his salary unde 1645 s-l, R.c.s., ant **mentioned** ituationand controlling

‘a AnnaOetsd *xsr $wal aa-- tafAona1 (La

a looal and affairs of 

### oounties, by 

### Certain

provisions of xaa Oiril Btatutes, vere special law atbamptopini0n It0.

0-2973. 5~1, 

### V.A.T.O.S.,

appliesin your let-bQr are ale0 tional as a leaal end epeold. lrv atte@ilng to regulate 

### the afTaIr of a county,under the cuth~~~tlercited In Opinion So. 

### O-2973. we wlc1orre h0Petith a oopy or salid opinion. The folloving~rovisiaxmof A%'tlale 1645, Vm'non'rr Annotated Texao Civil Bbatutes,vill control the questionEonarable Forreatelr Hsnooak, Pege 2

herein;
"In any countyhaving a population of thlrtyfive thousand (35,000)inhabitants,or over, according to the pmaeding Federal Census, 

### or having a tsx valuationof Fifteen lrullion Dollars (@5,000,000), or over, aooordlng to the last approved tsx ro&la, there shall be bienniallyappointed m Auditor of Amounts and 

### Flnanaea, the title of said of’fioer to be County Auditor,who shall hold his ofilce 

### Sor two (2) years, and who shall reoelve 

### as oolqpensation for hle serviceuOne Hundred and Tventy-fiveDollars ($125) for each million dollars, or ppsjor 

### portion thereof on the assessed valuation,the annual salary to be computed from the last approved tax rolls; raid annual salary from county fund#:~ll--not exceed Three Thousand; Six Hundred Dollar8 ($3,600)....' Under tb@ Sacta stated the oounty auditor's salary should be set on the basis outlined&r Artiale 1645, nupra, ($125.00on each mllllon dollarsvaluition OF major portion thereof,which in this instancewould **be** 27 x 4125.00 inasmuch as one-halfmillion is not a major portion of one million) and the proper amount for said 

### salaryis the mm of (3,375.OO.

Trusting that this satisfactorily 

### ansvero

your inqulry, we are

very truly yourll ATTORHEYWRERALOFTEXAS

WJFIAW ImLosm
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-80007, 333-21341 and 333-29517) on Form S-8 of ACT Networks, Inc. of
our report dated July 29, 1997 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of ACT Networks, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1997.

                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                ----------------------------
                                                    Ernst & Young LLP

Woodland Hills, California
September 26, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>       5
                
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Jul-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            Aug-01-1995  
<PERIOD-END>                              Jul-31-1996
<CASH>                                     1,173,000                          
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  119,000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,312,000
<PP&E>                                       213,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               133,000 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1,459,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        388,000
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,000
<COMMON>                                      15,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 1,055,000   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1,459,000
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,000
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (2,253,000)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (21,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            21,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (2,251,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (2,251,000)       
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               62,000
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                              (2,189,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.16) 
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements (No.
333-10249,  333-10251, and 333-21253) on Form S-8 of Smithway Motor Xpress Corp.
of our report  dated  February  4, 1998,  relating to the  consolidated  balance
sheets of Smithway Motor Xpress Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1997,  which report  appears in the December 31, 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Smithway Motor Xpress Corp.



                                            /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Des Moines, Iowa
March 11, 1998
<PAGE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Gorman-Rupp Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U. S. C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officers knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. Date:  May 4, 2005
    /s/ Jeffrey S. GormanJeffrey S. GormanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) /s/ Robert E. KirkendallRobert E. KirkendallSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350 and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 18
Page 8(b)
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Western Power Equipment Corp, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Repost"), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
          Securities Exchange Act o f1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"),
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange
          Act; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Mark J. Wright
--------------------------
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting
Officer and Vice President of Finance
September 28, 2005
#### Do Sun PARK v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 62627.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Do Sun Park applying for certiora-ri, or writ of review, to the Court of Ap*1221peal, First Circuit. Civil Service Commission.

Writ denied.
00 srq T ~

s UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

o 

# ~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

## 0

+l qC PROZ to, 2 

### J U IN 3 0 2014

Mr. J. R. Stroble Director, National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221

Dear Mr. Stroble: OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION



### We received your letter dated June 26, 2014, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the draft recertification memo the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) plans to issue to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). We concur with the draft recertification memo to recertify ORNL's TRU waste characterization program including the Tier 1 change for modifications to the IQ3. This change was evaluated during our continued compliance inspection in February 2014 and approved in our June 18, 20141etter.

In accordance with EPA regulations at 40 CFR 194.8 (69 FR 42571-42583), on August 21, 2008, EPA approved ORNL's contact-handled (CH) transuranic (TRU) waste characterization program (See EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49, I1-A4-103) and on February 3, 2009, EPA approved ORNL's remote-handled (RH) TRU waste characterization program (See EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49, II-A4-111).

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft recertification memo for ORNLCCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Rajani Joglekar (202-343-9462) or Ed Feltcorn (202-343-9422).

Sincerely,



## ~ . Edward Feltcorn Center for Waste Management and Regulations

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable 9 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100%, Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper

### cc: (Electronic Distribution)

Alton Harris, DOE HQ EM Joe Franco, CBFO Norma Castaneda, CBFO NTP Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP Tom Morgan, CBFO NTP Jon Richards, EPA Region 4 Trais Kliphuis, NMED Site Documents, CBFO Tom Peake, EPA Raymond Lee, EPA
#### Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, Respondent, v Patterson-Stevens, Inc., et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Patterson-Stevens, Inc., Plaintiff, v Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, Defendant. (Action No. 2.)

(Appeal No. 1.)

[656 NYS2d 1023]

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs *(see, Loafin’ Tree Rest, v Pardi*[appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 985). (Appeal from Order and Judgment of *965Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.—Dismiss Causes of Action.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Doerr, Balio and Fallon, JJ.
### CORRECTED MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 15

- 00499

- CR

CHRISTOPHER ERNEST B RAUGHTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

Appeal from the 228th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1389139).

TO THE 228TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 14th day of July 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or

to reverse your order was determined. This Court made it s order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the order signed by the court on April 20, 2015. After submitting the case on the appellate record, the Court holds that the trial court’s order contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court aff irms

the trial court’s order.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.

Judgment rendered July 14, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Huddle, and Lloyd.WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

October 2, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
**
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § **1350)**
 

The undersigned, as the Executive Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Georgia-Pacific Corporation, certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2003, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Georgia-Pacific Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and not be relied upon for any other purpose. 

 

/s/ DANNY W. HUFF                       

**
EXHIBIT 15


November 4, 1999


To Mirage Resorts, Incorporated

We  are  aware  that  Mirage Resorts, Incorporated has  incorporated  by
reference   in   its   Registration  Statements  on  Form S-8 (File  No.
33-16037),  on  Form  S-8 (File No. 33-48394),  on  Form  S-8 (File  No.
33-63804),  on Form  S-8  (File No. 33-60183) and on Form S-8 (File  No.
333-59455) its Form 10-Q for the  quarter ended September 30, 1999 which
includes  our  report  dated  November 4,  1999  covering  the unaudited
interim financial information contained therein.  Pursuant to Regulation
C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of
these  registration  statements  or  a  report  prepared or certified by
our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

Very truly yours,



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
# C_2023205EN.01000501.xml

| 12.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 April 2023 — Council of the European Union v Aisha Muammer Mohamed El-Qaddafi

(Case C-413/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya - List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union - Retention of Ms El-Qaddafi’s name on the lists - Sufficiently solid factual basis - Obligation to state reasons)

(2023/C 205/06)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Aisha Muammer Mohamed El-Qaddafi (represented by: S. Bafadhel, Barrister)

Intervener in support of the appellant: French Republic (represented by: J.-L. Carré, A.-L. Desjonquères and W. Zemamta, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Aisha Muammer Mohamed El-Qaddafi; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Aisha Muammer Mohamed El-Qaddafi;

| 3. | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 382, 20.9.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-13-1995
<CASH>                                          70,999
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    104,892
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               189,173
<PP&E>                                         397,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                 152,461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 459,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          167,164
<BONDS>                                        156,515
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,752
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   459,510
<SALES>                                        328,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               330,848
<CGS>                                          233,867
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  233,867
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,296
<INCOME-TAX>                                       177
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,119
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,119
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1




Exhibit 12

GTE South Incorporated

STATEMENT OF THE RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Three Months
                                                                   Ended
                                                                 March 31,
                                                                   1998
                                                                ------------
<S>                                                              <C>           
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income before extraordinary charge                             $ 75,857      
  Add - Income taxes                                               48,168      
      - Fixed charges                                              17,878      
                                                                 --------      
Adjusted earnings                                                $141,903      
                                                                 ========      
                                                                               
Fixed charges:                                                                 
  Interest expense                                               $ 15,044      
  Portion of rent expense                                                      
      representing interest                                         2,834      
                                                                 --------      
                                                                               
Adjusted fixed charges                                           $ 17,878      
                                                                 ========      
                                                                               
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                   7.94      
</TABLE>