Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2018
                              Alexander Rozenberg, M.D., DAB CR5139 (2018)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Alexander Rozenberg, M.D., DAB CR5139 (2018)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Alexander Rozenberg, M.D.,
	(NPI:  1760554141),
	Petitioner,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-18-568Decision No. CR5139April 5, 2019

        
              
    

      DECISION
Petitioner, Alexander Rozenberg, M.D., is a New York physician who participated in the Medicare program until March 8, 2010, when CMS revoked his enrollment and imposed a three-year bar on reenrollment.  CMS took this action because, on February 20, 2009, Petitioner Rozenberg was convicted of falsifying business records, a felony.  He recently reapplied for program enrollment but, because of his felony conviction, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) denied his application.  Petitioner now appeals the denial.
I find that CMS is authorized to deny Petitioner Rozenberg’s reenrollment application because, within the ten years preceding his filing, he was convicted of a felony that CMS reasonably determined is detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries.  I therefore affirm CMS’s determination.
Background
By letter dated November 6, 2017, the Medicare contractor, National Government Services, denied Petitioner Rozenberg’s application for reenrollment in the Medicare program.  CMS Exhibit (Ex.) 6.  As the letter explains, the contractor acted pursuant to
Page 2
42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(3) because Petitioner was convicted of a felony that CMS determined is detrimental to the best interests of the program and its beneficiaries.
Petitioner requested reconsideration.  In a reconsidered determination, dated January 22, 2018, a CMS hearing officer upheld the denial, citing Petitioner’s felony conviction for falsifying business records in the first degree.  P. Ex. 1; *see* CMS Ex. 1.  Petitioner timely appealed and that appeal is now before me.
CMS moves for summary judgment, which Petitioner opposes.  Because neither party proposes any witnesses, an in-person hearing would serve no purpose.  *See* Acknowledgment and Pre-hearing Order at 5 (¶¶ 8, 9, 10).  The matter may therefore be decided based on the written record, without considering whether the standards for summary judgment are satisfied.
CMS has submitted its brief (CMS Br.) and seven exhibits (CMS Exs. 1-7).  Petitioner submits his brief and four exhibits (P. Exs. 1-4).  In the absence of any objections, I admit into evidence CMS Exs. 1-7 and P. Exs. 1-4.
Discussion
***CMS may deny Petitioner enrollment in the Medicare program because, within the last ten years, he was convicted of falsifying business records, a felony that CMS reasonably finds detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries***.1
**Statute and regulations**.  CMS may deny a provider’s or supplier’s enrollment in the Medicare program if, within the preceding ten years, he was convicted of a felony offense that CMS “has determined to be detrimental to the best interests of the program and its beneficiaries.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(3); *see also* Social Security Act (Act) §§ 1842(h)(8) (authorizing the Secretary to deny enrollment to a physician who has been convicted of a felony offense that the Secretary has determined is “detrimental to the best interests of the program or program beneficiaries”) and 1866(b)(2)(D) (authorizing the Secretary to deny enrollment after he ascertains that the provider has been convicted of a felony that he “determines is detrimental to the best interests of the program or program beneficiaries”).
Offenses for which billing privileges may be denied include – but are not limited to – felony crimes against persons, such as murder, rape, assault, and similar crimes; financial crimes such as extortion, embezzlement, income tax evasion, insurance fraud, and similar crimes; a felony that places the Medicare program or its beneficiaries at immediate risk (such as malpractice); and felonies “outlined in section 1128 of the Act.”  42 C.F.R.
Page 3
424.530(a)(3).  Section 1128 crimes include:  program-related crimes; crimes related to the neglect or abuse of patients in connection with the delivery of a healthcare item or service; *crimes relating to health care fraud*; and crimes relating to the unlawful manufacture, distribution, prescription, or dispensing of a controlled substance.  *See* 42 C.F.R. § 1001.101.
**Petitioner’s felony offense**.  Petitioner Rozenberg was charged in New York state court with multiple counts of insurance fraud, falsifying business records, grand larceny, and other crimes.  CMS Ex. 1.  He was ultimately convicted on one misdemeanor count of insurance fraud and one felony count of falsifying business records.  CMS Ex. 1 at 4.  Specifically, in billing a health insurance company, he falsely claimed that he had provided a higher level of medical service (“consultation”) than he actually provided (“initial evaluation”).  He was sentenced to 15 days confinement, five years’ probation, and 300 hours of community service.  CMS Ex. 4 at 2.
Based on his felony conviction:
CMS revoked his Medicare billing privileges, effective March 8, 2010, and imposed a three-year bar on reenrollment.  CMS Ex. 2.The Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services (IG) excluded him from participating in all federal health care programs for a minimum period of five years.  *See* CMS Ex. 3.In a determination and order dated December 17, 2010, the New York State Board for Medicine revoked his medical license.  CMS Ex. 4 at 3-4.**Petitioner’s reenrollment application**.  In an application filed on August 21, 2017, Petitioner applied for reenrollment in the Medicare program.  CMS Ex. 5.
Petitioner maintains that his Medicare enrollment should be allowed.  First, he points to the Inspector General’s June 2, 2010 notice letter, which proposed his exclusion under section 1128(a) of the Social Security Act (Act), and, citing section 1128(c)(3)(B) of the Act, advised him that the minimum period of exclusion is five years.  P. Br. at 1-2; *see* CMS Ex. 3.  Petitioner suggests that section 1128(c)(3)(B) precludes CMS from denying his reenrollment because more than five years have passed since he was excluded.  His period of exclusion “expired” on June 3, 2015, so, he maintains, CMS must now allow him to reenroll.  P. Br. at 2.
But exclusion under section 1128 and denial of enrollment under 42 C.F.R. § 424.530 (as authorized by sections 1842(h)(8) and 1866(b)(2)(D) of the Act) are separate and distinct enforcement tools, each with its own requirements and consequences.  *See Fady Fayad, M.D.*, DAB No. 2266 at 12 (2009), *citing Abdul Razzaque Ahmed, M.D.*, DAB No. 2261
Page 4
at 13 (2009).  That the IG may have imposed a minimum period of exclusion does not preclude CMS from making its own, independent determination regarding a supplier’s reenrollment.  Indeed, the statute and regulations mandate that it do so.
Petitioner characterizes his crime as a minor billing error that cost the Medicare program only $25.18.  Putting aside the fact that innocent billing errors do not, as a general rule, result in felony convictions, I am not authorized to review the validity of that conviction.  A denial of enrollment under section 424.530(a)(3) derives from the supplier’s (or provider’s) felony conviction.  Section 424.530(a)(3) does not authorize me to review the underlying conviction.  *See Douglas Bradley, M.D.*, DAB No. 2663 at 15-16 (2015).
Petitioner also challenges CMS’s claim that I lack the authority to review its determination that an offense is detrimental to the best interests of the program or program beneficiaries.  P. Br. at 2.  In fact, my review authority is limited.  I may determine whether the regulatory elements required for denial of enrollment under section 424.530(a) are present, and, if the record establishes that they are, I must affirm. *See Bradley*, DAB No. 2663 at 6-7, 13-14 and cases cited therein.
Moreover, in this case, I need not even consider whether I have the authority to review CMS’s exercise of its discretion to deny enrollment; by regulation Petitioner’s felony offense *is* detrimental to the best interests of the program and its beneficiaries.  Not only was his a “financial crime,” similar to insurance fraud, it was a felony that subjected him to exclusion under section 1128(a).  Because Petitioner’s conviction was among those specifically enumerated in section 424.530(a), CMS may deny his Medicare enrollment without regard to equitable or other factors.   *See Fayad*, DAB No. 2266 at 15-17.
Thus, CMS justifiably determined that Petitioner was convicted of a felony detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries and may deny his enrollment in the Medicare program.
Conclusion
CMS may deny Petitioner Rozenberg’s Medicare enrollment application because he was convicted of a felony that CMS reasonably determined is detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries.  I therefore affirm CMS’s determination.


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law to support my decision. back to note 1 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back