alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7234

WILLIAM ABDULLAH MUSTAFA, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

THEODIS BECK, Secretary, North Carolina Department of 

Corrections, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., 

Chief District Judge. (1:08-cv-00892-JAB-DPD) 

Submitted: September 24, 2009 Decided: November 16, 2009 

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

William Abdullah Mustafa, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

William Abdullah Mustafa seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mustafa has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-18-031]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

July 10, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        1.                         *Agendas for future meetings:*                         None.                    

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote on Inv. Nos. 701-TA-582 and 731-TA-1377 (Final) (Ripe Olives from Spain). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission by August 1, 2018.

                        5.                         *Outstanding action jackets:*                         None.                    

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

 Issued: June 25, 2018.

William Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-14001 Filed 6-26-18; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
# Fourth Cou **rt of Appeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 23, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00408

- CR

Armando Garcia VILLEGAS

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 4, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 365296

Honorable Jason Garrahan, Judge Presidi ng



### ORDER

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed on September 16, 2015. To date, neither the appellant’s brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. The clerk of this court has attempted to contact counsel by telephone but has been unsuccessful.

It is therefore ORDERED that either the appellant’s brief or a motion for extension of time to file appellant ’ s brief must be filed in this Court within ten days of the date of this

order. Any motion for extension sh ould include a reasonable explanation for the failure to timely file the appellant ’ s brief and the failure to timely file the motion for extension.

If counsel fails to timely respond, we will abate the case to the trial court for an abandonment hearing p ursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(b).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 23rd day of September, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M IGUEL OR OZC O INFANTE, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 14-70716 Age n c y No. A200-157-530 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 24, 2016 * * B e fore : LEAVY, FER NANDEZ, a

nd R AW LINSON, C irc uit Judge s. M igue l Oroz c o Infa

nte , a native and c itiz e n of M e xic o , pe t itions for re vie w of the B o ard of Im

m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism i ssing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) orde r of re m o va l. W e dismi ss thepe t ition for re vie w. 

# FIL ED MAR 02 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r Oroz c o Infa nte ’ s une xha

uste d c onte ntions that the IJ viola

te d his c onstitutiona

l, sta tutory , a nd re gula tory rights to c ounse l by de ny ing his re que st for a

n a dditional c ontinua

nc e , or tha

t he qua lifie s for a sy lum , withholding of rem o v a l, a nd prote c tion under the C onve ntion Against Torture . Se e Tijani v . Holde r , 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th C ir. 2010) (we la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w le ga l c la im s not pre se nte d in a n a lie n’ s a dm inistra

t ive proc e e dings be fore the B IA). W e a lso la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r any c la im of ine ffe c tive a ssista

nc e of c ounse l, be c a

use Oroz c o Infa

nte did not raise it with the B IA in a m otion to re ope n . Se eLiu v . W

ate r s , 55 F.3d 421, 424-25 (9th C ir. 1995) (re quiring e xha ustion of ine ffe c tive a ssista nc e of c ounse l c l a im

through a

m otion to re ope n be fore the B IA). Fina lly , we la c k

jurisdic tion ove r c la im s re g arding prose c utoria l disc re tion, se e V ilc hiz-Soto v . Holde r , 688 F.3d 642 (9th C i r. 2012), a nd do not c o nside r e vide nc e outsidethe a dm inistra tive re c o rd, se eFishe r v . IN S, 79 F.3d 955, 963 (9th C ir. 1996) (e n ba

nc ) (the c ourt’ s re v ie w is limite d to the a dm inistra tive re c o rd). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D.

1 4 - 7 0 7 1 6 2
# C_2020320EN.01002801.xml

| 28.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/28

---

Action brought on 10 August 2020 — Makk v EUIPO — Ubati Luxury Cosmetics (PANTA RHEI)

(Case T-501/20)

(2020/C 320/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Stefan Makk (Graz, Austria) (represented by: I. Hödl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ubati Luxury Cosmetics, SL (Alcobendas, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark PANTA RHEI — International registration designating the European Union No 1 393 404

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 June 2020 in Case R 2337/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and eventually the intervener to pay the costs incurred with the present proceeding before the Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and eventually the intervener to pay the costs incurred with the present proceeding before the Court.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
No. 10715.

#### McCorkle *v.*Williams et al.

Decided November 24, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Mr. Harry R. Weber,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Wm. H. Pugh*and *Mr. Anthony B.*Dunlap, for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
H. Res. 550

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

September 29, 1994.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (S. 349) to provide for the disclosure of lobbying activities to influence the Federal Government, and for other

purposes. All points of order against the conference report

and against its consideration are waived except for the provisions of clause 2 of rule XXVIII (the three-day availability

requirement for conference reports). The conference report

shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,266
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  156,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,784
<INVENTORY>                                    126,756
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               311,940
<PP&E>                                         464,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                 288,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 546,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          196,912
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,382
<OTHER-SE>                                     188,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   546,076
<SALES>                                        178,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               178,699
<CGS>                                          128,384
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,810
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,667
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,624
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,043
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,043
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

I, Frank
A. Lodzinski, certify that:

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GeoResources, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank A. Lodzinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Frank A. LodzinskiFrank A. LodzinskiPrincipal Executive OfficerAugust 6, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JOHNSTON
INDUSTRIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 28, 1997 AND
FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                         900,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               45,049,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,405,000
<INVENTORY>                                 61,542,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           116,104,000
<PP&E>                                     233,564,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             112,887,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             254,163,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,417,000
<BONDS>                                    140,297,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,000
<COMMON>                                     1,246,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,103,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               254,163,000
<SALES>                                    174,502,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           174,502,000
<CGS>                                      142,159,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              142,159,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,357,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               220,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,381,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (8,898,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (2,263,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (6,635,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 152,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,483,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# all_lease09012018
#### Reuel LAWSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-126.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 3, 1970.

Hughlan Long, Public Defender, and Gregory B. Hoppenstand, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on August 5, 1969 (225 So.2d 581) affirming the order of the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed January 28, 1970 (231 So.2d 205) remanded the cause to this court for the jpurpose of a further remand to the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Florida with directions to grant the defendant a hearing on his motion to vacate;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on August 21, 1969 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court and the cause is remanded to the Criminal Court of Record with directions to grant the defendant a hearing on his motion to vacate as set forth in the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16(b) Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.
254 La. 780

#### Richard J. EISWIRTH v. John R. COOPER et al. John R. COOPER v. Richard J. EISWIRTH et al. Ralph P. VOORHIES v. Richard J. EISWIRTH et al.

No. 50021.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 8, 1969.

In re: Richard J. Eiswirth and Hardware Mutual Casualty Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 223 So.2d 884; 223 So.2d 889; 223 So.2d 890.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         237,614
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,984
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               320,013
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    430,795
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      11,170,489
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        10,995,251
<LOANS>                                     25,856,148
<ALLOWANCE>                                    233,277
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,965,477
<DEPOSITS>                                  26,549,828
<SHORT-TERM>                                   267,786
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            598,677
<LONG-TERM>                                  9,427,181
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,399
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,116,606
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              39,965,477
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,367,178
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              152,776
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               562,558
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,082,512
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             923,274
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,331,341
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          751,171
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   (1,406)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                285,119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                576,743
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     360,826
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   360,826
<EPS-BASIC>                                     6.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.02
<LOANS-NON>                                    230,777
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                15,281
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 65,911
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               244,466
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,139
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              233,277
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           233,277
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 291/29 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 291 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4729 November 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 291

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4729 November 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 291/1 | Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, and the Court of Auditors — Balance sheets and accounts of the 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th European Development Funds for the financial year 2003 | 1 |
| 2004/C 291/2 | Statement of Assurance by the Court of Auditors concerning the sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth European Development Funds (EDFs) for the financial year 2003 | 196 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 291/1

Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, and the Court of Auditors — Balance sheets and accounts of the 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th European Development Funds for the financial year 2003

1

2004/C 291/2

Statement of Assurance by the Court of Auditors concerning the sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth European Development Funds (EDFs) for the financial year 2003

196

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN