alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Stefan Rainer Forkert

, * From the 238 th District Court

of Midland County

Trial Court No. CR47750

.

Vs. No. 11

- 16

- 00279

- CR * October 4 , 2018

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Simmons, F .J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.

, Simmons, F .J., sitting by assignment,

and Wright, S.C.J., sitting by

assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              13
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                        989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,122
<PP&E>                                             530
<DEPRECIATION>                                     224
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,101
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,976
<SALES>                                        105,326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,326
<CGS>                                          105,889
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,655
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 343
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,498)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)
        

</TABLE>
| Date:  March      9, 2009 | /s/ Marc T.      Giles                                  |   |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                | Marc      T. GilesPresident      and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|                                |                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |   |
| Date:  March      9, 2009 | /s/ Michael R.      Elia                                     |   |
|                                | Michael      R. EliaExecutive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                |   |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS

10.1     Form of Performance Stock Memorandum dated February 22,
         2000, regarding conditional opportunity to acquire
         Company stock granted to seven executive officers,
         respectively.

10.2     Credit Agreement among Global Marine Inc., Various
         Lending Institutions,  ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., as
         Administrative Agent, Co-Lead Arranger and Book Runner,
         and Credit Lyonnais New York Branch, as Documentation
         Agent and Co-Lead Arranger, dated as of April 7, 2000.

15.1     Letter of Independent Accountants regarding Awareness
         of Incorporation by Reference.

27.1     Financial Data Schedule.  (Exhibit 27.1 is being
         submitted as an exhibit only in the electronic format
         of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q being submitted
         to the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Exhibit
         27.1 shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section
         11 of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 18 of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Section 323 of the
         Trust Indenture Act, or otherwise be subject to the
         liabilities of such sections, nor shall it be deemed a
         part of any registration statement to which it
         relates.)
#### STUARTS *vs.*REYNOLDS. SMITH *vs.*REYNOLDS.

An execution binds from its delivery to the sheriff, who is bound to levy it on all the defendant’s property without special orders.

Pi. fa. issued 25th of April, 1843, levied, &c. Venditioni exponas. Sheriff returns, goods *sold, &c.*

Pi. fa. issued 3d of May, 1843, levied, &c. Venditioni exponas issued, and returned goods sold, &c.

The Stuarts issued their execution against Reynolds, and laid it in the sheriff’s hands on the 25th of April, without any special orders as to the levy, but with orders to summon James Steel as garnishee. Smith, the junior execution creditor, learning that the sheriff had no orders to levy on a crop of corn which was about to be planted, issued his execution and placed it in the sheriff’s hands, with special orders to levy on the crop of corn. The sheriff levied both executions at the same time. The proceeds of sale were brought into court by the sheriff, being claimed by both execution creditors; and the court ordered the money paid to the oldest execution.

An execution binds from the date of its delivery to the sheriff; who is bound, without particular 'directions, to levy it on any property of the defendant that may come to his knowledge. This is the order of his writ? and to depart from it and make the order of preference in respect to each article of property to depend on special orders of the creditors, would be to involve the sheriff, and the law, in great confusion and perplexity.
# C_2020068EN.01006801.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/68

---

Action brought on 16 January 2020 – Forex Bank v EUIPO – Coino UK (FOREX)

(Case T-26/20)

(2020/C 68/76)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Forex Bank AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: A. Jute, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Coino UK Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark FOREX – European Union trade mark No 4 871 836

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 October 2019 in Case R 2460/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | annul the Cancellation Division’s decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Cancellation Division’s decision;

| — | order that the European Union trade mark No 4 871 836 remains in force; |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the European Union trade mark No 4 871 836 remains in force;

| — | order the EUIPO to bear the applicant’s costs of the proceedings before the Cancellation Division, the Boards of Appeal, as well as the General Court with an amount to be specified later. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EUIPO to bear the applicant’s costs of the proceedings before the Cancellation Division, the Boards of Appeal, as well as the General Court with an amount to be specified later.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
EXHIBIT 32
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 Date:  July 29, 2010

/s/ Jeffrey S. GormanJeffrey S. GormanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Wayne L. KnabelWayne L. KnabelChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

162) ll-E-122 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:08 AM Sheet 162 of 264 
P.2 

01-13-1998 10-03RM FROM ZONE'S FIBERGLASS TO 19199410234 P.02 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

A 945 2 

n-E- ni. 

Contact Report 

Robert Jemison, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

Januaiy 9,1997 

Mr. Zane Kline 

Company; Zaac's Fiberglass Shop, Inc. 

Telephone Number: (701)275-8835 

Fax Nunber: (701)275-6157 

Contact Summary: 

Mr. Zane Kline was contacted to update infonnation provided in the 1993 EPA Reinforced 

Plastic/Composites Screening Survey submitted by Zane-s Fiberglass Shop, Inc, for their facility 

located in Scranmn, North Dakota In response to my questions Mr. Kline indicated the following: 

The facility stiU uses pressure-fed rollm 5^^> 

in the fabrication of ceitain products. The resin used in this fabrication process contains 

approxnnately3$% styrene by weight and does not contain a vapor suppressant. No additional 

styrene is added to the resin during the -fabrication process. 

The facility still uses an airless atomized spray gun (Glasscxaft LPA-II) to apply a gel coat 

in tiie fabrication of certam products. Tbe gel coat used in this fabrication process contains 

approximately-MSi styrene by weight No addhkraal styrene or methyl mefliaciylate is added to this 

gelcoat yy% 

,fA' 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

INFO-RMATION IS ACCURATE "^L ^ p*-^^ ^
No. 11134.

#### McKemy, Receiver, et al. *v.*Hunt et al.

Decided October 6, 1908.

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Mr. Albert Mendels on; Mr. Smith W. Bennett*and *Mr. Patterson A.*Reece, for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Joseph T. Harrison; Messrs. Spangenberg & Spangenberg*and *Messrs. Galvin & Bauer,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew and Summers, JJ., concur.
<page>
				     EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund Limited Partnership (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
?Report?), I, Kevin Perry, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter
Management Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	 The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 31, 2005
1

M E M O RANDU M

To : S e w a g e S l udg e I n c i n e r a t o r D o c k e t

F r om : A m

y H a m b r i c k

, U S E P A

D a t e : F e b r u a r y 2011

Sub j ec t: SS I I nv e n t o r y M a p O v e r l a y W it h T r i b a l L a n d s

E P A h a s r ece i v e d c oo r d i n a t e d c o mm e n t s f r o m t h e N T AA ; t h o s e c o mm e n t s ca n b e r e v i e w e d i n t h e pu b li c d o c k e t

, d o c u m e n t n u m b e r

E P A

- HQ

- O A R

- 2009

- 0559

- 0130

. 1

. C o mm e n t e r s r ec o mm

e n d e d t h a t E P A p r o v i d e a m a p o v e r l a y t h a t acc o u n t s f o r b o t h SS I u n it s a n d t r i

b a l

l a n d s s o t r i

b e s ca n ac qu i

r e a b e tt e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g o n h o w t h e y mi g h t b e a ff ec t e d b y s u c h s it e s a n d t h e s e s t a n d a r d s i n g e n e r a l . E P A i s

p r o v i d i n g a m a p o v e r l a y a tt ac h e d t o t h i s m e m o f o r t h e SS I d o c k e t s o t h a t t r i b e s ca n ac qu i

r e a b e tt e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g o n h o w t h e y mi g h t b e

a ff ec t e d b y SS I s i t e s a n d t h e s t a n d a r d s i n g e n e r a l

. F u r t h e r qu e s t i o n s r e g a r d i n g t h e l o ca t i o n o f SS I u n it s ca n b e d i r ec t e d t o t h e E P A s t a ff

c o n t ac t a s li s t e d i n t h e SS I f i n a l s t a n d a r d s a n d gu i d e li n e s

.2
# C_2020287EN.01004402.xml

| 31.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/44

---

Action brought on 17 July 2020 — SBG v EUIPO — VF International (GEOGRAPHICAL NORWAY EXPEDITION)

(Case T-459/20)

(2020/C 287/65)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Super Brand Licencing (SBG) (Villeurbanne, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and A. Sion, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: VF International Sagl (Stabio, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark GEOGRAPHICAL NORWAY EXPEDITION in black, taupe, red and white — EU trade mark No 9 860 834

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 April 2020 in Case R 664/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs, including the costs incurred by the applicant in respect of the proceedings before the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs, including the costs incurred by the applicant in respect of the proceedings before the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, by reason of the incorrect assessment of the existence of bad faith at the time when the application for the mark was filed. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, by reason of the incorrect assessment of the existence of bad faith at the time when the application for the mark was filed.

---
**EXHIBIT 99.9**

** **

**CONSENT OF TETRATECH WEI INC.**

 

March 20, 2012

 

Brigus Gold Corp.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

 

**Re: Brigus Gold Corp.**

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We hereby consent to (i) the use of our name in connection withthe following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F forthe year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 40-F”) of Brigus Gold Corp. (the “Company”) to which this consentrelates: (A) the technical reports entitled “Black Fox Project National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report” dated January6, 2011, “NI 43-101 Technical Report, Pre-feasibility Study, Brigus Gold Corp., Goldfields Project, Saskatchewan, Canada”dated effective October 6, 2011 and “Technical Report and Resource Estimate on the 147 and Contact Zones of the Black FoxComplex, Ontario, Canada” dated December 15, 2011 (collectively, the “Reports”), (B) the Company’s AnnualInformation Form for the year ended December 31, 2011 and (C) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis forthe year ended December 31, 2011, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Reports in theRegistration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-113889, 333-162558 and 333-167757), as amended, as amended, or any relatedabbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) underthe Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplementsthereto and (iii) all other references to us included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statementsand in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.

 

Sincerely,

 

Tetra Tech WEI Inc.
EXHIBIT 15.1





                       ACCOUNTANTS' AWARENESS LETTER



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


Re:      Global Marine Inc. Registration Statements


We are aware that our report dated August 6, 1997, on our review of the
condensed consolidated interim financial information of Global Marine Inc. and
subsidiaries for the three and six months ended June 30, 1997, and included in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is incorporated by reference in (i) the
prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-32088, 33-40961, and 33-63326), respectively, for the
Global Marine Inc. 1989 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, (ii) the prospectus
constituting part of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 33-40266) for the Global Marine Savings Incentive Plan, (iii)
the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-40961) for the Global Marine Inc. 1990
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, (iv) the prospectus constituting part
of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-57691)
for the Global Marine Inc. 1994 Non-Employee Stock Option and Incentive Plan
and (v) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 33-58577) for the proposed offering of
up to $75,000,000 of debt securities, preferred stock and/or common stock.
Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should
not be considered a part of any of said registration statements prepared or
certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.




Houston, Texas                   /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
August 7, 1997
ACTIO N 

# l 6 o S I 0-100302-01 1 CONTRO L NO . N E W JERSE Y GENERA L ASSEMBL Y MAJORIT Y LEADE R JOSEP H CRYA N ASSEMBLYMAN , 20

TM DISTRIC T 98 5 STUYVESAN T AVENU E UNION , NE W JERSEY 0708 3 (908 ) 624-088 0

C 5 Februar y 22 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra y LaHoo d Unite dState s Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Subject : Haned aCombinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-O.ST-2010-001 8 ~ " ^ Dea r Secretary LaHood , I support th e Continental Airline s applicatio n t o provid e dail y nonsto p servic e betwee n Ne w York/Newark an dToky o Haned aairport . Ne w ai r

servic e t o Haneda , whic h i s schedule dt o begi n late r thi s year , i s mad e possibl e b y th e wid e rangin g ope n skie s agreemen t

wit h Japa n achieve db y you r Department . I applau dyou r effort s o n th e histori c ope n skie s agreemen t an dno w urg e yo u t o selec t Continenta l t o provid e servic e connectin g th e U.S.' s financial an dcommercia l cente r at Ne w York/Newark

with Tokyo' s central/downtow n airport . Liberty - Haned aservic e woul dprovid e acritica l lin k betwee n tw o o f

th e world' s larges t

economie s an dwil l hel p boos t trad e an dcommerc e acros s th e Ne w York/Newark regio n an dsecondarily acros s th e entir e northeaster n regio n o f th e U.S . Liberty airport

i s surrounde db y th e larges t populatio n pe r

squar e mil e i n th e country , whic h include s million s o f Asian Americans . Additionally , recen t studie s sho w tha t

for every flight

adde db y Continenta l i n th e Ne w York/Newark region , th e loca l econom y benefit s a s employmen t i s sustained , regiona l income s ar e enhance dan dtrad e expands . A s Continental operate s th e onl y tru e hu b i n th e regio n that connect s Ne w York/Newark an dmuc h o f

th e U.S . t o th e world . Continenta l i s th e righ t

choic e for

ne w Haned aservic e a s communitie s acros s th e entir e eastern U.S . wil l gai n acces s t o Haned avi aconnection s at Liberty . Additionally , Continental Airline s ha s se t itsel f apart a s astron g airlin e with a commitmen t

t o safet y an dexcellenc e for

customers . N o doub t

thi s shoul db e take n int o accoun t whe n awardin g an y rout e t o Haneda . Continental Airline s i s committe dt o th e Asian regio n an dt o nonsto p Toky o Haned aservice . Th e Ne w York/Newark economy , million s o f

American s o n th e U.S . eas t coast , th e airline' s thousand s o f employee s an dhundred s o f thousand s o f U.S . consumer s wil l benefi t fro mContinental' s propose dservic e an dwil l work togethe r t o mak e Libert y Internationa l Airport - Haned aservic e area l success . I urg e yo u t o awar dToky o Haned aright s t o Continenta l Airline s an dmy regio n o f th e U.S . Reg a

' ' J(^epj3^rya n ^ Assemblyman , Distric t 2 0
RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING ON HAY 11, 1982

WHEREAS,

WHEREAS ,

WHEREAS,

the Joint Committee on Printing was created by law to establish
policy for the Government Printing Office and for the Federal
printing establishment, and it has always been the policy of the
Joint Comnittee on Printing to supervise and conduct Government
printing business on a cost-effective and efficient basis

the authority of the Joint Comnittee has been confirmed and
supported by opinions of the Attorney General and the Comptroller
General of the United States, and

this authority extends to all matters involving the GPO personnel
including wages, salaries and compensation,

BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, That prior approval of the Joint Committee on

Printing is necessary for alterations to, or relocation of,
facilities, for changes in the structure of the work-force,
for implementation of new technology and services, and for all
decisions that affect the scope and character of the Federal
printing program.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That no furloughs, reductions in force, or other

adverse personnel actions shall be tmposéd upon GPO employees as
ad hoc solutions to immediate problems until a study of the long-
range printing needs of the Federal Government has been conducted
by GPO/JCP and evaluated by the JCP to determine the future
technological and personnel requirements of the GPO,