alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
___________

No. 96-1034

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Ronald Wayne Thomas, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

__________

 Submitted: August 1, 1996 

 Filed: August 27, 1996

__________

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After a jury found Ronald Wayne Thomas guilty of one count of

possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C), the district court sentenced him to 151 months

imprisonment and three years supervised release. On appeal, Thomas argues

that the district court improperly assessed a two level increase for

possession of a revolver, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1).

We agree with the district court's assessment of the § 2D1.1(b)(1)

increase. The revolver in question--a .357 magnum--was found underneath

the mattress in the bedroom of Thomas's apartment at the time of his

arrest. Police also found a container of crack cocaine in the adjacent

bathroom. The proximity of
-2-

Thomas, the drugs, and the revolver established a sufficient nexus between

the revolver and Thomas's criminal activity. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1),

comment. (n.3) (increase applies if weapon is present, unless clearly

improbable that weapon was connected with offense); United States v. Betz,

82 F.3d 205, 210-11 (8th Cir. 1996) (government showed sufficient nexus

between weapon and criminal activity where drugs and guns were accessible

and on premises from which defendant conducted drug-related activities).

Contrary to Thomas's suggestion, the increase was proper even though the

revolver was unloaded. See United States v. Overstreet, 5 F.3d 295, 297

(8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (rejecting challenge to increase on ground

that weapon was not dangerous as it was not loaded); United States v.

Rowley, 975 F.2d 1357, 1363-64 (8th Cir. 1992) (affirming increase where

unloaded weapons found where defendant also kept drugs).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### The State vs. Branum.

.The prosecutor is not liable for costs, under the statute, triiere, instead of a trial, a nolle prosequi is entered.

*Appeal from Tell Circuit Court.*

Hon. John J. Clendenin, Circuit Judge.

Hollowell, attorney general for the state.

Batson and Cravens, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Compton

delivered the opinion of the Court.

On an indictment, found in the Yell Circuit Court at September term, 1859, against William Aikin, for assault and battery, the name of Hiram Branum, the party injured, was endorsed as prosecutor. At a subsequent term, a *nolle pros,*was entered, and judgment for costs rendered against Branum. The case is brought here on appeal from the decision of the court below sustaining Branum’s motion in arrest of judgment, and the question is, was Branum liable for the costs?

In a certain class of prosecutions — to which this case belongs — the. statute requires the name of the party injured to be endorsed on the indictment as prosecutor; and then provides that if any indictment, so endorsed, shall be returned “ not a true bill,” or if the defendant be acquitted on the trial, the prosecutor shall be adjudged to pay the costs. *Dig., chap,*52, *secs. 89, 90,*91. The prosecutor, in the case *before*us, was *541clearly not liaftle. The entering a *nolle pros,*is not a trial within the meaning of the statute, or in any other sense, and unless there is a trial, where a true bill has been found, the prosecutor is not to be burdened with the costs — the law is so written, and we most apply it.

Let the judgment be affirmed.
# Former President's Domestic Mail

                - Title:  Former President's Domestic Mail 
                - Form #:         GSA1789A      
                - Current Revision Date:  Obsolete
                - Authority or Regulation: 

PDF versions of forms use Adobe      ReaderTM.      Download Adobe ReaderTM

Search for another form

Print PageEmail Page

Top
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 329

Designating 1994 as a year to honor the memory and leadership qualities

of the Honorable Thomas P. ‘‘Tip’’ O’Neill, Jr., the late Speaker of

the House of Representatives.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 25, 1994

Mr. ROSE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Designating 1994 as a year to honor the memory and leadership qualities of the Honorable Thomas P. ‘‘Tip’’ O’Neill,

Jr., the late Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Whereas the death of the late Speaker of the House of Representatives, Thomas P. ‘‘Tip’’ O’Neill, Jr., on January

5, 1994, has created not only a personal loss to his many

friends and colleagues, but also a great loss to the Nation;

Whereas Speaker O’Neill, is remembered by all for his dedication to good government and his love for the people of

the United States;

Whereas Speaker O’Neill’s compassion and goodness of heart

and his spirit of cooperation and conciliation were evident

to all who knew him;
2

HRES 329 IH

Whereas in the House of Representatives and in his life,

Speaker O’Neill’s personal charm and political skill transcended differences of personality and party;

Whereas Speaker O’Neill presided over the House of Representatives from the Ninety-fifth Congress through the

Ninety-ninth Congress and emerged as one of the greatest American political leaders of this century; and

Whereas it is appropriate that the House of Representatives

rededicate itself to the principles of leadership personified

by Speaker O’Neill: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That 1994 is designated as a year to honor

2 the memory and leadership qualities of the Honorable

3 Thomas P. ‘‘Tip’’ O’Neill, Jr., the late Speaker of the

4 House of Representatives.

5 SEC. 2. There shall be available from the contingent

6 fund of the House of Representatives such sums as may

7 be necessary to carry out this resolution.

8 SEC. 3. The Committee on House Administration of

9 the House of Representatives shall have authority to pre10 scribe regulations to carry out this resolution.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In connection with the Annual Report of Wheeling-Pittsburgh
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James P. Bouchard, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ James P. Bouchard  
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
Exhibit to

this report and should not be considered filed as a part of this report.
# C_2022064EN.01002802.xml

| 7.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 26 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Constitucional — Portugal) — Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira v VectorImpacto — Automóveis Unipessoal Lda

(Case C-136/21) (1)

(2022/C 64/40)

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 189, 17.5.2021.

---
257 La. 860

#### CRESCENT FORD TRUCK SALES, INC. v. SELECT BANANA, INC.

No. 51163.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1971.

In re: Select Banana, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 242 So.2d 276.

Writ denied. No error of law.
Emerald Kalama Chemical , LLC

1296 Third Street NW, Kalama, WA 98625 / Phone: 360

- 673

- 0317

www.emeraldmaterials.com 

## New Chemical Substance Physical Properties

Physical Properties

Physical State @ Ambient Liquid

Specific Gravity @ 25°C 0.9899

Viscosity @ 8.1°C 53.0 cP

Boiling Point @ 760 mmHg 247°C

Boiling Point @ 3 mmHg 129.7°C
**Exhibit 21.1**

# SUBSIDIARIESOF REGISTRANT

| 1.     |   | XImage Corporation, a  California Corporation                                                              |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 2.     |   | ImageWare Systems ID  Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly Imaging Technology Corporation)        |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 3.     |   | I.W. Systems Canada  Company, a Nova Scotia unlimited liability company                                    |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 4.     |   | ImageWare Digital Photography Systems, LLC, a Nevada limited  liability company (formerly Castleworks LLC) |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 5.     |   | E-Focus West LLC, a Nevada limited liability company                                                       |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 6.     |   | Digital Imaging International GmbH, a company formed under German  laws                                    |

 

----
NUMBER 13

- 14

- 00274

- CV



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

MARI REGALADO, Appellant,

v.

SERGIO MUNOZ JR.

, Appellee.

On appeal from the 139th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas

.



### ORDER

Before Chief Justice Val d ez and Justices Perkes and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court regarding the briefing schedule for this accelerated

appeal under the Texas Election Code. The Honorable Robert M. Blackmon ordered that

appellant’s brief was to be filed with this Court by June 6, 2014. See T EX

. E LEC

. C ODE

A NN

. § 232.014(d) (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.). The election code also

provides that this Court may review these deadlines on motion of a party. See id

.2

Appellant’s counsel states in his motion that he has not “been furnished” with a copy of

th e clerk’s record, which was filed in this Court on May 22, 2014. This Court attempted

to email a copy of the record to appellant’s counsel; however, we were unable to do so

due to technical difficulties with the filing system. On June 3, 2014, we finally submitted

a copy of the clerk’s record and reporter’s record to appellant’s counsel. Appellee has

filed a response to the motion opposing any extension to file the brief.

The Court, having considered appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the

b rief, appellee’s response

, and the nature of th e case, is of the opinion that the motion for

extension of time to file the brief should be granted in part with order. The Court GRANTS

IN PART appellant’s motion for extension of time and ORDERS appellant’s brief to be

filed in this cause on or before June 10, 2014. The Court further ORDERS appellee’s

brief to be filed in this cause ten days thereafter, or on or before, June 20, 2014. The

Court will not favorably entertain further motions for extension of time in this case

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the

4 th day of Ju ne , 201 4

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6279

JORGE GEVARA, a/k/a Jorge Galeas, 

Plaintiff – Appellant, 

v. 

BETTY INPOLD, 

Defendant – Appellee, 

and 

ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR.; ROBERT C. LEWIS; RICHARD NEELY; 

LAWRENCE PARSONS; JEFFREY T. SMITH; JUDY ATWATER; DENNIS E. 

MARSHALL; D. HOUSE; J. HYATT; E. COLEMAN, 

Defendants. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00454-RJC) 

Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 24, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit 

Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Jorge Gevara, Appellant Pro Se.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
3

PER CURIAM: 

Jorge Gevara seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his motions for reconsideration and leave to amend 

his complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over 

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory 

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-47 (1949). The order Gevara seeks to appeal is neither a 

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FRONTIER TELEPHONE OF ROCHESTER, INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>        0000936105
<NAME>       FRONTIER TELEPHONE OF ROCHESTER, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,406
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,646
<INVENTORY>                                        710
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,951
<PP&E>                                         930,479
<DEPRECIATION>                                 597,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 430,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,455
<BONDS>                                         40,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       232,165
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,673
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   430,485
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               326,794
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  233,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   640
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 90,283
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,610
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             58,673
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    58,673
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-05-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                          27,390
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (9,369)
<INVENTORY>                                    149,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               353,160
<PP&E>                                         371,315
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (30,105)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 775,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          255,370
<BONDS>                                        238,530
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           293
<OTHER-SE>                                     217,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   775,463
<SALES>                                        773,068
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               773,068
<CGS>                                          533,484
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  713,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,247
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,892
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,188
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,156
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,032
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,032
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
        


</TABLE>
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/09 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.56 N 76.20 WMeters AGL
U. S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE | Keeping America Informed | OFFICI AL | DIGITAL | SECURE

732 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC 20401-0001 http://www.gpo.gov | www.facebook.com/USGPO | twitter.com/USGPO

CIRCULAR LETTER NO. 1096

September 28, 2022

TO: Printing and Publishing Officials of the Federal Government

SUBJECT: GPO’s Regional Offices to Operate as Fully Virtual Agency Procurement Services (APS) 

Teams

Effective October 1, 2022, GPO will operate its Regional APS Offices as virtual teams. Since March, 

2020, our regional offices have successfully operated using almost 100% telework. Based on GPO’s 

success with remote operations, GPO believes our teams will continue to be able to serve you 

effectively and efficiently. 

Related to eliminating our physical locations, GPO has realigned and restructured the Regional APS 

Teams. GPO has completed some merging and renaming to best reflect the geographic area 

covered by each Regional APS Team. Alternate Contract Solutions and Agency Procurement 

Services Teams in Washington, DC are unchanged.

New Regional APS Team Former GPO Offices Included

Northeast Region Columbus, Philadelphia, Boston

MidAtlantic Region Virginian Beach, Charleston

Southeast Region Atlanta

Northcentral Region Chicago

Southcentral Region Dallas, San Antonio

Mountain Region Denver

Southwest Region San Francisco

Northwest Region Seattle

To find the updated email addresses, phone numbers and a full list of staff for each team 

see https://www.gpo.gov/how-to-work-with-us/agency/services-foragencies/procurement-services-team. 
A color-coded map depicting the updated geographic areas for the Regional APS teams is 

accessible @ https://www.gpo.gov/docs/default-source/forms-standards-pdffiles/nationwide-procurement-teams-oct-2022.pdf

GPO is committed to providing the same timely procurement consulting and support 

services for all your printing and publishing requirements that you expect to receive. To 

reinforce this commitment, GPO’s customers are welcome to work with any APS Team they 

prefer.

Beginning October 1st, please use the new team email addresses and phone numbers for 

the submission of orders and communication. To insure there is no disruption in service, 

the previous Regional Office email addresses will be automatically forwarded to the new 

addresses provided.

As always, we will serve you with the same devotion to quality, cost savings, and expertise that you 

have come to expect from GPO. We believe the new team structure will reinforce these GPO core 

values.

If you have any questions about information contained in this Circular Letter, please 

contact your GPO National Account Manager at nam@gpo.gov or (202) 512-1904.

Sincerely,

SANDRA MacAFEE

Managing Director, Customer Services
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130874 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130874 COA: 264999 Saginaw CC: 02-021048-FC ROBERT JAY JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk