alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT, Appellant, v. Howard W. CARAWAY et al. (Parcel #5) (George A. Walters and Myrtle H. Walters, his wife), Appellees.

No. P-157.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 1972.

Geoffrey B. Dobson and Barbara Ann McPherson, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Tyrie A. Boyer, of Dawson, Galant, Maddox, Boyer, Sulik & Nichols, Jacksonville, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Anderson v. State Road Department (Fla.App.1968) 204 So.2d 899; Williams v. Simpson (Fla.App.1968) 209 So.2d 262.

SPECTER, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
259 La. 750

#### John A. BROWN v. MID-CITY MOTORS, INC., et al.

No. 51568.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 1971.

In re: Mid-City Motors, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 248 So.2d 27.

Application denied — On the facts found, the opinion of the Court of Appeal is correct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         558,748
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  794,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,130
<INVENTORY>                                     60,413
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,515,944
<PP&E>                                      31,195,598
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,837,838
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,914,698
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          876,645
<BONDS>                                     11,674,625
<COMMON>                                       148,540
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,686,873
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,914,698
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,713,748
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,518,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (43,776)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,035,093
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                204,584
<INCOME-TAX>                                    67,504
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            137,080
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   137,080
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 490

Condemning the terrorist attacks on the Delegation of Argentine Israeli

Associations on July 18, 1994, and a Panamanian commuter plane

on July 20, 1994.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 1994

Mr. ACKERMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Affairs

RESOLUTION

Condemning the terrorist attacks on the Delegation of Argentine Israeli Associations on July 18, 1994, and a Panamanian commuter plane on July 20, 1994.

Whereas the bombing of the Delegation of Argentine Israeli

Associations on July 18, 1994, is the deadliest attack on

Jews in the Western Hemisphere to date, and the worst

attack on Jews outside Israel since World War II;

Whereas the attack on the Delegation of Argentine Israeli

Associations was directed at the center of Jewish life in

Argentina;

Whereas the intimidation of the innocent continues through

bomb threats against the hospital that is caring for the

victims of the attack;
2

•HRES 490 IH

Whereas on July 20, 1994, in another savage terrorist attack, a Panamanian commuter plane was blown up, killing 21 persons, 12 of whom were Jewish;

Whereas the same Lebanon-based group, calling itself the

‘‘Partisans of God’’, took responsibility for both diabolical

acts;

Whereas terrorism, neo-Nazi activities, and anti-Semitic activity throughout the world continue to escalate, and the

safety and security of Jewish people throughout the

world is a matter of serious concern;

Whereas the kind of vicious hatred that motivated these attacks is still prevalent in many countries throughout the

world, including the United States; and

Whereas terrorism must be condemned in the strongest terms

whenever and wherever it occurs: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) extends it condolences to the families and

3 friends who lost loved ones in the bombing of the

4 Delegation of Argentine Israeli Associations on July

5 18, 1994, and the Panamanian commuter plane on

6 July 20, 1994;

7 (2) condemns these inhuman and unforgivable

8 terrorist attacks on innocent people, and calls for

9 worldwide cooperation in bringing the perpetrators

10 of this crime against humanity to justice;

11 (3) expresses support for the Jewish commu12 nities in Argentina and Panama, and their efforts to

13 attain safety and security in their own countries;
3

•HRES 490 IH

1 (4) urges the governments and the people of

2 Argentina and Panama to continue to work to stamp

3 out the scourge of anti-Semitism and neo-Nazism;

4 and

5 (5) condemns anti-Semitism, neo-Nazi activi6 ties, and terrorism wherever they occur, and urges

7 all the members of the world community to do the

8 same.

Æ
# C_2020247EN.01003702.xml

| 27.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/37

---

Action brought on 27 May 2020 — Naturstrom v Commission

(Case T-316/20)

(2020/C 247/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Naturstrom AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: I. Zenke and T. Heymann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant's decision of 26 February 2019 declaring the merger ‘RWE/E.ON Assets’ compatible with the common market (Case M.8871) (OJ 2020 C 111, p. 1); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant's decision of 26 February 2019 declaring the merger ‘RWE/E.ON Assets’ compatible with the common market (Case M.8871) (OJ 2020 C 111, p. 1);

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The action is based on three pleas in law, which are essentially identical or similar to those put forward in Case T-312/20, EVH v Commission.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheets for  CIMARRON-GRANDVIEW GROUP,  INC. at September 30,1999, the Statements
of Income  for  the  year  ended  September 30, 1999,  and  is qualified  in its
entirety by reference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         145,802
<SECURITIES>                                    10,755
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,557
<PP&E>                                           3,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 160,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              767
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       693,949
<OTHER-SE>                                    (533,481)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   160,468
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,640
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,176
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,464
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,464
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,646
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00






</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



Subsidiaries of Borders Group, Inc.


SUBSIDIARY                          STATE OF INCORPORATION
----------                          ----------------------
BB Holdings, Inc.                           Michigan
Borders, Inc.                               Colorado
Borders Fulfillment, Inc.                   Delaware
Borders Management, LLC                     Delaware
Borders Online, LLC                         Delaware
Borders Outlet, Inc.                        Colorado
Borders Properties, Inc.                    Delaware
Planet Music, Inc.                          North Carolina
Niche Marketing Limited, Inc.               Ohio
  d/b/a All Wound Up!                       Ohio
The Library, Ltd.                           Missouri
WB Holdings, Inc.                           Michigan
Walden Book Company, Inc.                   Colorado
Waldenbooks Properties, Inc.                Delaware
Books (UK) Limited
  formerly Books etc. Limited               U.K.
Borders New Zealand Limited                 New Zealand
Borders PTE. Limited                        Singapore
Borders Australia PTY, Limited              Australia
BGI U.K. Limited                            U.K.
BGP U.K. Limited                            U.K.
Paperchase Products Limited *               U.K.


* BGI owns 19.9% with an option to acquire the remaining shares.
Randall $. Fiertz 

Director, Airport Compliance and Management Analysis 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave., SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

RE: City of Watsonville's Action Plan in Response to FAA Policy Change 79 FR 66282-01, 

Docket FAA-2013-0988 

Dear Mr. Fiertz: 

This letter responds to the Federal Aviation Administration's {FAA) amendment of its policy and 

procedures concerning the use of Airport Jet Fuel Sales Tax with the following action plan. In 

November 2014, the FAA adopted an amendment to its "Revenue Use Policy" originally 

adopted in February of 1999. Effective December 8, 2014, such amendment confirmed the 

requirement applied the tax proceeds from sales of aviation fuel. Accordingly, local jurisdictions 

are required to submit an action plan by December 8, 2015 {and allows implementation until 

2017) indicating how the proceeds of taxes related to sales of aviation fuel are utilized for 

aviation purposes. For purposes of complying with this rule, aviation related purposes include 

airport capital and operating costs, and state aviation programs. 

The City of Watsonville voters have enacted three special tax measures since December 30, 

1987 which would be subject to this amended policy: 

Measure Rate Purpose 

• City of Watsonville Public Safety Transactions and Use Tax 0.50% Library 

• Santa Cruz County Public Library Public Library Transactions 0.25% Police & Fire 

and Use Tax 

• City of Watsonville Retirement Sales Tax 0.25% Retirement 

Please note these are special taxes and Prop 218 requires proceeds from these taxes are used 

for the express purpose approved for the voters. Nevertheless, for purposes of responding to 

the FAA's requirement for the submission of a plan; the City estimates the annual amount of 

these revenues could range from $$2,500 to $3,000 depending on demand and prices of jet fuel 

during the year. Since, the City utilizes significant resources in support of aviation capital and 

operating costs for the City's airport; the City believes these expenditures exceed the estimated 
• Access to and from the airport, including roads, and highways 

• Infrastructure including water, and sewer 

Over the next few months, the City will continue working to fully determine the cost or service 

provision to the airport and the sales tax revenue generated from jet fuel sales. 

Please contact me with any questions you may have by phone at 831-768-3470 or e-mail at 

ezequiel.vega@cityofwatsonville.org . 

Sincerely, 

Ezequiel Vega 

Administrative Services Director 

CC: Charles Montoya, City Manager 

Marcela Tavantzis, Assistant City Manager 

Rayvon Williams, Airport Manager
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 12, 2020

No. 04-19-00818-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.R.C., A Child,

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-1390-CV-A

Honorable Dulce Madrigal, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On January 2, 2020, appellant requested a copy of the appellate record and appointment 

of counsel. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution grants indigent criminal 

defendants the right to counsel, but only in criminal cases, not civil cases. Culver v. Culver, 360 

S.W.3d 526, 535 n.17 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2011, no pet.). The clerk’s record indicates this 

case is a modification of child support case that does not involve circumstances that would 

trigger statutory rights to counsel, such as the termination of parental rights or enforcement of 

arrearage through civil or criminal contempt. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 107.012-.013 

(termination of parental rights); see id. § 157.163 (enforcement of arrearage through civil or 

criminal contempt). We therefore DENY appellant’s request for appointment of counsel and 

GRANT appellant’s request for a copy of the record.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of February, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
# C_2021368EN.01001902.xml

| 13.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 368/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/19

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Københavns Byret — Danmark) — Orion Corporation v Lægemiddelstyrelsen, in the presence of: Teva Danmark A/S

(Case C-165/21) (1)

(2021/C 368/32)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 206, 31.05.2021.

---
IV

House Calendar No. 168

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 441

[Report No. 103–529]

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to consideration

of a certain resolution reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 24, 1994

Mr. HALL of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect

to consideration of a certain resolution reported from

the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule

2 XI for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to a resolution reported

5 on the legislative day of May 25, 1994, providing for con6 sideration of the bill (H.R. 4426) making appropriations
2

HRES 441 RH

1 for foreign operations, export financing, and related pro2 grams for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995.
3

HRES 441 RH
House Calendar No. 168

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 441

[Report No. 103–529]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI

tion reported from the Committee on Rules.with respect to consideration of a certain resoluMAY 24, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
# C_2022472EN.01001401.xml

| 12.12.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Oradea — Romania) — Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia and Others v YF and Others

(Case C-301/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Directive 2000/78/EC - Article 2(1) and (2) - Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age - National legislation which leads to a situation in which the remuneration of certain judges is higher than that of other judges of the same rank and performing the same work - Article 1 - Purpose - Exhaustive nature of the discrimination referred to)

(2022/C 472/16)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Oradea

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia, Curtea de Apel Cluj, Tribunalul Bihor, Tribunalul Satu Mare, Tribunalul Sălaj

Respondents: YF, KP, OJ, YS, SL, DB, SH

Other parties to the proceedings: Consiliul Naţional pentru Combaterea Discriminării, Tribunalul Cluj

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 2(1) and (2) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000, establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, must be interpreted as not applying to national legislation which — as interpreted in binding national case-law — leads to a situation in which the remuneration of certain judges appointed after that legislation entered into force is lower than that of judges appointed before that legislation entered into force, where there is no resulting direct or indirect discrimination on grounds of age. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 2(1) and (2) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000, establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, must be interpreted as not applying to national legislation which — as interpreted in binding national case-law — leads to a situation in which the remuneration of certain judges appointed after that legislation entered into force is lower than that of judges appointed before that legislation entered into force, where there is no resulting direct or indirect discrimination on grounds of age.

| 2. | Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as precluding discrimination only where it is based on one of the criteria referred to expressly in Article 1 of that directive. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as precluding discrimination only where it is based on one of the criteria referred to expressly in Article 1 of that directive.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 518 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 518

 Returning to the Senate the Senate amendments to the bill H.R. 4554, 
making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug 
   Administration, and related agencies programs for the fiscal year 
                      ending Septemeber 30, 1995.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 1994

 Mr. Gibbons submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Returning to the Senate the Senate amendments to the bill H.R. 4554, 
making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug 
   Administration, and related agencies programs for the fiscal year 
                      ending Septemeber 30, 1995.

    Resolved, That Senate amendment No. 83 to the bill H.R. 4554 making 
appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug 
Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes, in the opinion of 
this House, contravenes the first clause of the seventh section of the 
first article of the Constitution of the United States and is an 
infringement of the privileges of this House and that such bill with 
the Senate amendments thereto be respectfully returned to the Senate 
with a message communicating this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
The Honorable R. E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern 1 District of Iowa. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-2856

___________ Marilyn J. Bryant, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Monfort Pork Plant; Con Agra, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: December 3, 1997 Filed: December 10, 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Marilyn J. Bryant a

ppeals from the district court’s entry of summary judgment 1 in favor of her former employer in her sex discrimination action. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we conclude that summary judgmen t was properly entered. Because an extended opinion would serve no pre cedential value, we affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.G. 

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic 

Conferences of the International Air 

Transport Association 

OST-2010- OZ6 3 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

lATA AGREEMENT APPROVED & IMMUNIZED 

DOCKET OST- / ^ - 0 ^.^ 3 ACTIO;- DATE VC n ' if , 1<^/C^ 

This approval and grant of antitrust immunity is subject, where applicable, 

to conditions previously imposed. 

This action is effective after 7 days unless a petition is filed under 

14 CFR 385.30 or a review is undertaken on the Department's own motion. 

In view of the agreement's noncontroversial nature and the availability of 

the above pHJ^dure, the 21-day TCriodiai4 CFR 303.42 is waived. 

irector, OfFicewf tntemational Aviation 

8 October 2010 

Comnnunications with respect to 

this document should be sent to 

Douglas E. Lavin 

Regional Vice President - North America 

Intemational Air Transport Association 

1776 K St. N.W. #12'^ Floor 

Washington DC 20006