alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 130 (Friday, July 6, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 31516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14418]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 54

[WC Docket No. 10-90; Report No. 3095]

Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Petitions for Reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Petitions for Reconsideration (Petitions) have been filed in 
the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding by Patrick R. Halley, on behalf 
of Mescalero Apache Telecom, Inc. and Martin L. Stern, on behalf of 
Sacred Wind Communications, Inc.

DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must be filed on or before July 23, 
2018. Replies to an opposition must be filed on or before August 2, 
2018.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Yelen, Wireline Competition 
Bureau, at: (202) 418-7400; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's 
document, Report No. 3095, released June 25, 2018. The full text of the 
Petitions is available for viewing and copying at the FCC Reference 
Information Center, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 
20554. It also may be accessed online via the Commission's Electronic 
Comment Filing System at: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. The Commission 
will not send a Congressional Review Act (CRA) submission to Congress 
or the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the CRA, 5.U.S.C. 
because no rules are being adopted by the Commission.
    Subject: Connect America Fund, Report and Order, FCC 18-37, 
published at 83 FR 18948, May 1, 2018, in WC Docket No. 10-90. This 
document is being published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47 
CFR 1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 2.

Federal Communications Commission.
Katura Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14418 Filed 7-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey L. Wright, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of G&K Services, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this quarterly report; and

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      quarterly report.

Date: February 8, 2005

                                              By: /s/ Jeffrey L. Wright
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Jeffrey L. Wright
                                                  Senior Vice President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  (Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2022257EN.01001201.xml

| 4.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — R. en R. v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit

(Case C-189/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common agricultural policy (CAP) - Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 - Annex II - Statutory management requirement 10 - Regulation (EU) No 1107/2009 - Article 55, first paragraph and first sentence of second paragraph - Direct support schemes - Common rules - Reduction or exclusion of support received under the CAP in whole or in part - Non-compliance with the cross-compliance rules - Use of a plant protection product which is not or is no longer authorised in the Member State concerned and, in the latter scenario, the use-by date of which has expired)

(2022/C 257/16)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: R. en R.

Defendant: Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit

Operative part of the judgment

Statutory management requirement 10, as is provided for in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008, which makes reference to the first paragraph and the first sentence of the second paragraph of Article 55 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC, must be interpreted as meaning that it covers also the use of a plant protection product which is not or is no longer authorised in the Member State concerned and, in the latter scenario, the use-by date of which has expired.

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 14.6.2021.

---
#### John NAVE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-2.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 16, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### PETER M. EVERETT, INC., Appellant, v. Norman INGRAM, Appellee.

No. 69-285.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 11, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 131 (Monday, July 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14654]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

Extension:
    Form SE, SEC File No. 270-289, OMB Control No. 3235-0327

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of 
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this 
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and 
Budget for extension and approval.
    Form SE (17 CFR 239.64) is used by registrants to file paper copies 
of exhibits, reports or other documents that would be difficult or 
impossible to submit electronically, as provided in Rule 311 of 
Regulation S-T (17 CFR 232.311). The information contained in Form SE 
is used by the Commission to identify paper copies of exhibits. Form SE 
is filed by individuals, companies or other entities that are required 
to file documents electronically. Approximately 19 registrants file 
Form SE and it takes an estimated 0.10 hours per response for a total 
annual burden of 2 hours (0.10 hours per response x 19 responses).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; 
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will 
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 
days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    Please direct your written comment to Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Candace 
Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to: 
[email protected].

    Dated: July 3, 2018.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14654 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
No. 11193.

#### Ritchie *v.*The State of Ohio.

Decided November 24, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Stark county.

*Mr. Luther Day,*and *Mr. W. J. Piero,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Charles C. Upham*and *Mr. Wade H. Ellis,*attorney general, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
| 1. | I havereviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ImageWare Systems,Inc.; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:April 21, 2017 | ImageWareSystems, Inc. By:/s/ WayneWetherell  |   |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                | WayneWetherell                                     |   |
|                | ChiefFinancial Officer(PrincipalFinancial Officer) |   |
----

| Legal Entity Name                    | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| Borders Direct, LLC                  | Virginia                      |
| Borders Fulfillment, Inc.            | Delaware                      |
| Borders, Inc.                        | Colorado                      |
| Borders International Services, Inc. | Michigan                      |
| Borders/JGE Joint Venture, LLC       | Michigan                      |
| Borders Online, Inc.                 | Colorado                      |
| Borders Online, LLC                  | Delaware                      |
| Borders Properties, Inc.             | Delaware                      |
| BGI (UK) Limited                     | U.K.                          |
| BGP (UK) Limited                     | U.K.                          |
| Borders Superstores (UK) Limited     | U.K.                          |
| Borders Bookstore (M) SDN.BHD        | Malaysia                      |
| BGI Franchise PTY LTD.               | Australia                     |

----
EX-10.8






 Apria, Inc. has requested confidential treatment of this registration statement and
associated correspondence 
 pursuant to Rule 83 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

 Exhibit 10.8 

June 27, 2018 
 Daniel J. Starck 

 

	Re:	 Amendment of Executive Employment Agreement 



Dear Dan: 
 This letter confirms the amendment, as set forth
below, of your Executive Employment Agreement, dated March 14, 2012, with Apria Healthcare Group Inc., as previously amended by that certain letter of agreement dated December 5, 2012 (the “Agreement”). 

In the event that you become entitled to severance pay pursuant to Section 4 of the Agreement, each payment in a series of payments under the Agreement
shall be deemed to be a separate payment for purposes of Section 409A of the Code of 1986, as amended. 
 Except as expressly provided in the preceding
paragraph, your Agreement continues in effect in accordance with its terms. This letter agreement shall be construed and interpreted consistent with Section 11(a) of the Agreement. 

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at [redacted]. 

 

			
	APRIA HEALTHCARE GROUP INC.


 
			
		
	By:	 	/s/ Celina Scally


 
			
	Name:	 	Celina Scally
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer


  

	
	/s/ Daniel Joseph Starck
	Daniel Joseph Starck
#### James Edward CHRISTIAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-938.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 15, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
(4910-I3-Pj

'ONCURRENCL'

O"""G SVMBOI.

RlN 2120-AA64

Federal Aviation Administration

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AT10N

Airplanes; Airbus Model A330-300 Series Airplanes; and Airbus Model A340-200 an

14 CFR Part 39 ~ (/

(Docket No. FAA-2010-0952; Directorate Identifier 201O-NM-131-AD; Amendme :n7JIG

,Cobb5 <7-0\ \ - a 1-02 • 7

39-*****' AD l4H-&-**-**j ( tv , mNG5'l"MllOl.

~(()(

'm ."E

/t//:V,.

-fzt::>

Ain\'orthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-201. -202, -203, -223, and -243

-300 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administr~tion (FAA), Department of Transportation

"o;;SYMIlOL

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products lis

OlmNG SVM"Ql

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) IN"'.,L""O

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe "ATF.

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: "OUT'NO SYM~O'.

L~mAL""[]

[1']l1eFAA published SFAR 88 (Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88).

By mail referenced 04/00/02/07/01-L296 of March 4th, 2002 and

04/00/02/07/03-L024 of February 3rd. 2003 the JAA [Joint Aviation

Authorities] recommended to the National Aviation Authorities (NAA) the

application of a similar regulation.

DAm

The aim of this regulation is to require * * * a definition review against

explosion hazards.

• • • • • • •
# Determination of Position Sensitivity

                - Title:  Determination of Position Sensitivity 
                - Form #:         GSA3560      
                - Current Revision Date:  02/1992
                - Authority or Regulation:  

PDF versions of forms use Adobe      ReaderTM.      Download Adobe ReaderTM

Search for another form

Print PageEmail Page

Top
**
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § **1350)**
 

The undersigned, as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Georgia-Pacific Corporation, certifies, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2003, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Georgia-Pacific Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.

/s/ ALSTON D. CORRELL                

**
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 148

EX PA R TE A R TE M I O G O N Z A LO LO PE Z , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 2 0 0 6 CR0 4 5 2 - D3 ( A) I N T HE 3 4 1 S T DI S TR I CT COURT FROM W EBB CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pur s u an t to th e p r o v is io n s o f A rti c le 1 1
. 0 7 o f th e T e xa s Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr o c edure , the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applica nt was convic ted of attempted ca pital murder and sente nced to life imprisonment. Ap pli c ant c on te nd s th at his c ouns e l r e nd e re d in e ff e c tiv e a ssi sta

nc e becau se he fa ile d to timely file a notice of appe al. We r emande d this a pplication to the trial court for f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law
. T h e tr ia l c o urt ha s d e te r

mi n e d th at t

r ia l c o un s e l f

a il e d to ti me ly f il e a n o ti c e o f a p p e a l. We2

find, there fore , that Applica n t is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of

-time appe al of the judgme nt of conviction in Cause No. 2006CR0452-D3(A) from the 341stJ udicial District Court of Webb County . Applicant is order ed returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of
a pp e a l so that he may

the n, wi th t

he a id o f co un se l, obt a in a me anin g fu l app e a l. Al l ti me lim its sh a ll be ca lculated a s if the sentenc e had be en imposed on the d at e on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appe al, he must take aff irmative steps to file a wr itten notice of ap p ea l in the trial court within 30 day s after the mandate of this Court iss ue s.

Deliver ed: May

6, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
[No. 306-2.

Division Two.

May 24, 1972.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Joseph Mello, *Appellant.*
#### Alfred S. AUSTIN and R. S. Austin, partners, d/b/a Austin Development Company, Appellants, v. Albert P. DURSO, Appellee.

No. 70-264.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 18, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 14, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                         Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
Datastream Systems, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 of Datastream Systems, Inc., of our reports dated
February 2, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Datastream
Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive
income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2000, and related schedule, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Datastream Systems, Inc:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
   Form                     Registration Number              Filing Date
------------           -----------------------------    ---------------------
<S>                        <C>                              <C>
  S-8                            333-00314                   1/16/1996
  S-8                            333-00080                   1/16/1996
  S-8                            333-03579                   5/13/1996
  S-8                            333-37655                  10/10/1997
  S-8                            333-50395                   4/17/1998
  S-8                            333-50397                   4/17/1998
  S-8                            333-50399                   4/17/1998
  S-8                            333-57055                   6/17/1998
  S-8                            333-79085                   5/21/1999
  S-8                            333-81663                   6/28/1999
  S-8                            333-43980                   8/17/2000
  S-8                            333-43982                   8/17/2000
</TABLE>

                                                    /s/ KPMG LLP

Greenville, South Carolina
March 29, 2001
##### 



Page 14 of 14  GENESEE CORPORATION
 EXHIBIT 32
 
  (i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Steven M. MorseSteven M. MorsePresident (Principal Executive Officer)September 6, 2007
 
  (iii)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(iv)
    
    The information contained in the Report presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Steven M. MorseSteven M. MorseTreasurer (Principal Financial Officer)September 6, 2007
#### JOHNNY BROWN’S, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. AMERICAN FIDELITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 70-1226.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
House Calendar No. 18

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 131

[Report No. 103–35]

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the concurrent

1997, and 1998.ernment for the fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996,congressional budget for the United States Govresolution (H. Con. Res. 64) setting forth the

MARCH 16, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 18

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 131

[Report No. 103–35]

Providing for the consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res.

64) setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for the fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 16, 1993

Mr. BEILENSON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the concurrent resolution

(H. Con. Res. 64) setting forth the congressional budget

for the United States Government for the fiscal years

1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of

3 rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 64) set-
2

HRES 131 RH

1 ting forth the congressional budget for the United States

2 Government for the fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997,

3 and 1998. The first reading of the concurrent resolution

4 shall be dispensed with. All points of order against the

5 concurrent resolution and against its consideration are

6 waived. General debate shall be confined to the congres7 sional budget and shall not exceed ten hours, with seven

8 hours (including four hours on the subject of economic

9 goals and policies) equally divided and controlled by the

10 chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

11 on the Budget, two hours controlled by Representative

12 Mfume of Maryland, and one hour controlled by Rep13 resentative Solomon of New York. After general debate

14 the Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion. No

15 further consideration of the concurrent resolution shall be

16 in order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the

17 House.