alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.5
 SUTURA, INC.  2006 STOCK OPTION PLAN
 1. Purpose of the Plan
 2. Definitions
            Sutura.2006 Stock Option Plan
    
    -1-




---



##### 



The Wall Street Journal
       Sutura.2006 Stock Option Plan
    
    -2-




---



##### 



i.e.,
 Sutura.2006 Stock Option Plan
    
    -3-




---



##### 



3. Administration of the Plan
 Plan Procedure
 Multiple Administrative Bodies
 Section 162(m)
 Rule 16b-3
 Other Administration
 Grant of Incentive Stock Options
 Powers of the Administrator
 Sutura.2006 Stock Option Plan
    
    -4-




---



##### 



Effect of Administrators Decision
 Liability
 Sutura.2006 Stock Option Plan
    
    -5-




---



##### 



4. Stock Subject To The Plan
 Basic Limitation
 Additional Shares
 5. Eligibility .
 6. Option Terms
 Exercise Price
   Sutura.2006 Stock Option Plan
    
    -6-




---



##### 



Vesting
 Term of Options
 Procedure for Exercise
 Effect of Termination of Service
 Termination of Service
 Disability of Optionee
 Sutura.2006 Stock Option Plan
    
    -7-




---



##### 



Death of Optionee
 Cause
 Post Termination of Service
   Shareholder Rights
 Non-transferability of Options
 Sutura.2006 Stock Option Plan
    
    -8-




---



##### 



7. Incentive Stock Options not
 Eligibility
 Exercise Price
 Dollar Limitation
 10% Shareholder
 Change in Status
 Sutura.2006 Stock Option Plan
    
    -9-




---



##### 



Approved Leave of Absence
 8. Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization
 Changes in Capitalization
 Dissolution or Liquidation
 9. Change in Control
   Sutura.2006 Stock Option Plan
    
    -10-




---



##### 



10. Modification, Extension, and Assumption of Options
 11. Share Escrow/Legends
 Sutura.2006 Stock Option Plan
    
    -11-




---



##### 



12. Tax Withholding
   Stock Withholding
 Stock Delivery
 13. Effective Date and Term of the Plan
 14. Time of Granting Options .
 Sutura.2006 Stock Option Plan
    
    -12-




---



##### 



15. Amendment and Termination of the Plan
 Amendment and Termination
 Effect of Amendment and Termination
 16. Regulatory Approvals
   17. No Employment/Service Rights
 18. Shareholder Approval .
 Sutura.2006 Stock Option Plan
    
    -13-




---



##### 



19. Financial Reports
 20. Market Stand-Off
 Sutura.2006 Stock Option Plan
    
    -14-




---



##### 



21. Governing Law
  SUTURA, INC.By:Its:
 Sutura.2006 Stock Option Plan
    
    -15-
#### AMER PERKINS *vs.*SUSANNAH CARTMELL.

Certiorari to Justice Elliott.

Action for two years’ dower, demand $20 00. After hearing and trial by referees, report and judgment for plaintiff for “ ten dollars annuity due to the plaintiff up to 16th October, 1835.”

The record showed that the cause of action was “ a demand of the plaintiff below of ten dollars per year, against the defendant below, as an annuity payable to her yearly in lieu of dower in a tract of land which belonged to her husband, Thomas Cartmel, *deceased;*and which tract was conveyed by deed to said defendant below, subject to the payment of said annuity.” *a*

The error assigned was, that the cause of action was not within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace.

*Per curiam.*

From the record it appears that the action was for an annuity chargeable on land, and the liability of the defendant as claimed is on account of his having purchased the land charged. There is no privit) of contract between the parties. If liable at all, he is only liable in respect of the land. Non constat, that there are not other liens against the land to its value prior to this.

*202
      *Wales,*for plaintiff in error.

*Boooth,*for defendant.

It can raise neither an express nor implied contract as between these parties; and the remedy, however small the case, is only in equity. If this law be hard it must be changed by the legislature. The cause of action is not cognizable before a justice of the peace.

Judgment reversed.
Exhibit 99.10



Consent of
Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.



Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities c/o
British Columbia Securities Commissions
P.O. Box 10142, Pacific Centre
701 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, BC V7Y 1L2



United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.
20549



Dear Sirs.



RE;  Miramar Mining Corporation  Form 40F / Annual Information Form



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F of Miramar Mining Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003, of the resource and reserve estimates for the Hope Bay project prepared by the MHBL staff in accordance with NI 43-101; the reference to Roscoe Postle as the reviewer of the Naartok-Perrin estimates; and to the use of Roscoe Postles name under in this annual report as a named expert.



Dated as of the 28th day of March, 2005



Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.



Per/s/ David Rennie
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Roland BOURGEOIS.

No. 61744.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 5, 1978.

In re: Roland Bourgeois applying for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Orleans Parish.

Denied.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 345

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses

of investigations and studies by the Committee on Education and Labor

in the second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1994

Mr. FORD of Michigan (for himself and Mr. WILLIAMS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House

for expenses of investigations and studies by the Committee on Education and Labor in the second session of

the One Hundred Third Congress.

1 Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and

2 studies by the Committee on Education and Labor (here3 inafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’),

4 including expenses for—

5 (1) procurement of consultant services under

6 section 202(i) of the Legislative Reorganization Act

7 of 1946; and
2

HRES 345 IH

1 (2) provision of assistance for members of pro2 fessional staff in obtaining specialized training under

3 section 202(j) of such Act;

4 there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House

5 not more than $4,238,064.

6 (b) Not more than $100,000 of the amount specified

7 in subsection (a) may be used for consultant services re8 ferred to in paragraph (1) of such subsection and not more

9 than $10,000 of such amount may be used for specialized

10 training referred to in paragraph (2) of such subsection.

11 SEC. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made

12 on vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

13 chairman of the Committee, and approved by the Commit14 tee on House Administration.

15 SEC. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolu16 tion for investigations and studies carried out during the

17 period beginning at noon on January 3, 1994, and ending

18 immediately before noon on January 3, 1995.

19 SEC. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution

20 shall be expended in accordance with regulations pre21 scribed by the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

   The undersigned, Bami Bastani, President and Chief Executive Officer of
ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  March 15, 2004
                                                 By:  /s/ Bami Bastani
                                                      ------------------------
                                                      Bami Bastani
                                                      President and
                                                      Chief Executive Officer






This certification shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purpose of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be
incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as
being incorporated by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be
retained by ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Schedule of Employee Incentive Stock Options


 




EXHIBIT 10.7

		
	Name

	# of Options Awarded


	 
	 

	Brian Krogol

	83,700


	Victor Galliano

	27,900


	Robert Mattucci

	27,900


	Ramon Mejido

	27,900


	Dagoberto Gonzalez

	10,000


	Margaret Ruiz

	10,000


	 
	 

	Total

	187,400


	 
	 

	Maximum Aggregate Options

	300,000


	Remaining Options in Plan

	112,600
#### THOMAS WEST, of R., d. b. *vs.*PETER *D.*SHOCKLEY, p. b., assignee of WM. B. PARSONS.

Certiorari.

The judgment to which the certiorari was taken was entered July 6, 1837, and execution issued the same day. The exceptions were sufficient to reverse the original judgment; but as the certiorari issued October 13, 1843, more than five years from rendition of the judgment, it was on this account dismissed. This objection was made by Mr. Cullen, counsel for the plaintiff below. And although' the proceeding by scire facias, after the levy under the fi. fa., which still remains undisposed of, was erroneous; the Court said this error did not change the nature of the case. The certiorari being dismissed as regards the original judgment, cannot operate on the proceedings by scire facias.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 456

Electing Representative Lewis of Kentucky to the Committees on Agriculture

and Veterans’ Affairs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 15, 1994

Mr. GINGRICH submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Electing Representative Lewis of Kentucky to the

Committees on Agriculture and Veterans’ Affairs.

1 Resolved, That Representative Ron Lewis of Ken2 tucky be, and is hereby, elected to the following standing

3 committees of the House of Representatives: Committee

4 on Agriculture and Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.

Æ
#### Eugene P. TERLECKI, Appellant, v. Hazel A. TERLECKI, Appellee.

No. 67-925.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 13, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
# Official Journal L 104/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 104 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6215 April 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 104

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6215 April 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2019/608 of 16 January 2019 amending Annex V to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the evidence of formal qualifications and titles of training courses
  (notified under document C(2019) 78)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/609 of 11 April 2019 amending Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU as regards the use of the pathogen identification test for African swine fever, the dispatch of the pigs through areas listed in the Annex and the applicability of the Decision
  (notified under document C(2019) 2739)

   (
  1
  ) | 92 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2019/608 of 16 January 2019 amending Annex V to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the evidence of formal qualifications and titles of training courses
  (notified under document C(2019) 78)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2019) 78)

1

1

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/609 of 11 April 2019 amending Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU as regards the use of the pathogen identification test for African swine fever, the dispatch of the pigs through areas listed in the Annex and the applicability of the Decision
  (notified under document C(2019) 2739)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2019) 2739)

1

92

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 141 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 141

To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit the use 
   of appropriated funds for travel outside of the United States by 
 Members of the House who are not seeking reelection and their spouses 
                          and personal staff.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1993

 Mr. Duncan submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit the use 
   of appropriated funds for travel outside of the United States by 
 Members of the House who are not seeking reelection and their spouses 
                          and personal staff.

    Resolved, That the Rules of the House of Representatives are 
amended by adding at the end the following new rule:

                              ``Rule LIV.

           ``foreign travel of members not seeking reelection

    ``No appropriated funds may be used to pay for or reimburse any 
Member for travel outside of the United States by such Member, or to 
pay or reimburse that Member's spouse, or any personal staff of that 
Member after the earlier of the date upon which--
            ``(1) that Member publicly states his intention not to seek 
        election to the succeeding Congress;
            ``(2) that Member fails to meet the qualifying deadline in 
        his State for election to the succeeding Congress; or
            ``(3) that Member is defeated in any primary or general 
        election.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### ART DIAMOND CENTER v. PURVIS.

No. 38852.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
263 La. 105

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Paul BROUSSARD v. Harold GAUTHE and Lafayette Parish School Board, intervenor.

No. 52877.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 19, 1972.

In re: Harold Gauthe applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 265 So.2d 828.

Application denied. The result is correct.

BARHAM, J.,

concurs in the denial. The action is incorrectly styled one under the “Intrusion into Office Statute” R.S. 42:71-87. The suit is one in Quo' Warran-to. Code of Civil Procedure Arts. 3901-3902. The definition of “Public Offcer” is contained in R.S. 42:71 and does not apply to this officer. “Public Officer” under the Code provisions does include this office holder.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>




                                   EXHIBIT 11

                        Golden West Financial Corporation
        Statement of Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
                 (Dollars in thousands except per share figures)


                                                      Three Months Ended
                                                           March 31
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                     2000            1999
                                                 -------------   -------------

<S>                                              <C>             <C>
Net Earnings                                     $    125,934    $    120,368
                                                 =============   =============

Weighted Average Shares                           159,958,610     169,742,922
    Add:  Options outstanding at period end         5,589,129       4,886,715
    Less: Shares assumed purchased back with
          proceeds of options exercised             4,715,964       3,191,700
                                                 -------------   -------------
Diluted Average Shares Outstanding                160,831,775     171,437,937
                                                 =============   =============

Basic Earnings Per Share                         $        .79    $        .71
                                                 =============   =============

Diluted Earnings Per Share                       $        .78    $        .70
                                                 =============   =============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 12

GTE South Incorporated

STATEMENT OF THE RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Three Months
                                                                       Ended
                                                                      March 31,
                                                                        1997
                                                                      --------
<S>                                                                   <C>
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income from continuing operations                                   $ 72,639
  Add - Income taxes                                                    44,495
       - Fixed charges                                                  15,526
                                                                      --------
Adjusted earnings                                                     $132,660
                                                                      ========
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                                    $ 13,407
  Portion of rent expense
     representing interest                                               2,119
                                                                      --------
Adjusted fixed charges                                                $ 15,526
                                                                      ========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                        8.54
</TABLE>
# C_2020399EN.01004202.xml

| 23.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/42

---

Action brought on 5 October 2020 — Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — Amigüitos pets & life (THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect)

(Case T-616/20)

(2020/C 399/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz and C. Elkemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Amigüitos pets & life, SA (Murcia, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect in colours white, red and black — Application for registration No 15 385 719)

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 July 2020 in Case R 424/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceeding before the General Court and order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs before the EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceeding before the General Court and order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs before the EUIPO.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 91(1) first sentence of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 91(1) first sentence of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 46(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 46(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 46(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 46(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
#### McCULLA v. CALDWELL-SCOTT ENGINEERING.

No. 38884.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
EXHIBIT 15.1



                         ACCOUNTANTS' AWARENESS LETTER


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


Re:  Global Marine Inc. Registration Statements

We are aware that our report dated May 12, 1999, on our review of the
condensed consolidated interim financial information of Global Marine Inc.
and subsidiaries for the three months ended March 31, 1999, and included
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is incorporated by reference in
(i) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-32088, 33-40961, and 33-63326),
respectively, for the Global Marine Inc. 1989 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan, (ii) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-40266) for the Global Marine
Savings Incentive Plan, (iii) the prospectus constituting part of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-40961)
for the Global Marine Inc. 1990 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan,
(iv) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-57691) for the Global Marine Inc.
1994 Non-Employee Stock Option and Incentive Plan, and (v) the combined
prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 33-58577 and 333-49807) for the proposed offering
of up to $500,000,000 of debt securities, preferred stock, and/or common
stock.  Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report
should not be considered a part of any of said registration statements
prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
Act.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
May 13, 1999