Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2020
                              Angela Johnson, DAB CR5774 (2020)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Angela Johnson, DAB CR5774 (2020)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Angela Johnson,
Petitioner,

v.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-20-665Decision No. CR5774December 9, 2020

        
              
    

      DECISION

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), acting through its Medicare administrative contractor, Palmetto GBA (Palmetto), denied Angela Johnson’s (Petitioner’s) Medicare enrollment application pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(1).  Palmetto denied Petitioner’s enrollment application because Petitioner, a licensed cosmetologist and phlebotomist, does not qualify to enroll in Medicare as a provider or as a supplier of medical and other health services.  Petitioner challenges the enrollment denial.  For the reasons set forth below, I affirm that CMS had a legal basis to deny Petitioner’s application for enrollment as a supplier in the Medicare program.

I.  Background and Procedural History

Petitioner describes herself as a “Home Health Professional . . . caring for disabled persons and elderly . . . .”  *See*CMS Exhibit (Ex.) 1 at 29.  In February 2020, Petitioner mailed Palmetto a completed Form CMS‐855I, the Medicare Enrollment Application for Physicians and Non-Physician Practitioners (enrollment application), to request enrollment as a Medicare supplier.  *Id*. at 1, 36.  Petitioner checked a number of boxes under the heading “Physician Specialty,” although she does not claim to be a physician.  *Id.*at 8.  Petitioner added the following note:  “Home Health Services include help [with]

**Page 2**

all these, legal issues, occupational therapy, sanitation (design services billed separately) [illegible] nutritional services for home health to heart patient.”  *Id.* Petitioner also checked boxes to indicate that she is a non-physician practitioner with the following specialties:  occupational therapist in private practice (Petitioner added “unlicensed” next to this check box); registered dietician or nutrition professional (Petitioner underlined “Nutrition Professional”); and undefined non-physician practitioner specialty (Petitioner added “licensed cosmetologist (for proof of professional skilled sanitation home health [services])”.  *Id.*at 9.  Petitioner attached to her application a copy of her current Tennessee Cosmetology License.  *Id.*at 31.

By letter dated March 5, 2020 (notice), Palmetto denied Petitioner’s enrollment application pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(1).  CMS Ex. 2.  Palmetto explained that, as a cosmetologist, Petitioner does not qualify as a provider of services or a supplier of medical and health services.  *Id.*at 1.  The notice informed Petitioner of her right to request reconsideration.  *Id.*at 1-2.  In a letter dated March 12, 2020, Petitioner requested reconsideration.  CMS Ex. 3.  In her reconsideration request, Petitioner argued that her cosmetology license qualifies her to provide home health care to a disabled Medicare patient.  *Id.*at 1.  She further represented that she is licensed and certified in venipuncture and phlebotomy.  *Id.* By letter dated May 22, 2020, Palmetto issued a reconsidered determination finding the enrollment denial proper pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(1).  CMS Ex. 4.

Petitioner timely requested a hearing.  *See*Docket Entry #1 in the Departmental Appeals Board (DAB) Electronic Filing System (E-File).  The case was assigned to me and, on July 27, 2020, my office acknowledged Petitioner’s hearing request and provided a copy of my Standing Prehearing Order (Prehearing Order).  Pursuant to the Prehearing Order, CMS submitted a Motion for Summary Judgment (CMS Br.) and four exhibits (CMS Exs. 1‐4).  Petitioner filed a Response to CMS’s Motion for Summary Judgment (P. Br.).  Petitioner additionally filed a number of letters and emails that are not labeled as exhibits.  *See, e.g.*, Docket Entries #9, 9a, 10, 11 in DAB E-File.  On October 27, 2020, I issued an order closing the record.  Docket Entry #15 in DAB E-File.  On December 2, 2020, in disregard of my October 27 Order, Petitioner submitted an email to my office containing attachments that she requested be made a part of the record.  *See*Docket Entries #16, 16a, and 16b in DAB E-File.  I do not consider these submissions because they were offered after the record was closed.  I have considered the remainder of Petitioner’s submissions in reaching this decision.

Petitioner did not object to the exhibits offered by CMS.  Therefore, in the absence of objection, I admit CMS Exs. 1‐4 into the record.  My Prehearing Order advised the parties that they must submit written direct testimony for any proposed witness and that an in-person hearing would only be necessary if the opposing party requested an opportunity to cross-examine a witness.  Prehearing Order ¶¶ 8-10; Civil Remedies

**Page 3**

Division Procedures (CRDP) §§ 16(b), 19(b); *Pac. Regency Arvin*, DAB No. 1823 at 8 (2002) (holding that the use of written direct testimony for witnesses is permissible so long as the opposing party has the opportunity to cross‐examine those witnesses).  Neither party submitted the written direct testimony of any witness.  Consequently, an in‐person hearing is not required, and I issue this decision based on the written record, without regard to whether the standards for summary judgment are met.  Prehearing Order ¶¶ 8-11; CRDP § 19(d).  I deny CMS’s motion for summary judgment as moot.

II.  Issue

The issue in this case is whether CMS had a legal basis to deny Petitioner’s application for enrollment as a supplier in the Medicare program.

III.  Jurisdiction

I have jurisdiction to hear and decide this case.  42 C.F.R. §§ 498.3(b)(17), 498.5(*l*)(2); *see also* Social Security Act (Act), § 1866(j)(8) (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1395cc(j)(8)).

IV.  Discussion

**A.  Statutory and Regulatory Background**

The Act authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) to establish regulations for enrolling providers and suppliers in the Medicare program.  Act, § 1866(j)(1)(A) (42 U.S.C. § 1395cc(j)(1)(A)).  Petitioner is a prospective supplier of health care services for purposes of the Medicare program.  *See* Act, § 1861(d) (42 U.S.C. § 1395x(d)); 42 C.F.R. § 400.202 (definition of supplier).  In order to enroll in the Medicare program and receive billing privileges, suppliers must meet certain criteria.  42 C.F.R §§ 424.505, 424.510, 424.516.  The regulations define *enrollment*as “the process that Medicare uses to establish eligibility to submit claims for Medicare‐covered items and services . . . .”  42 C.F.R. § 424.502.  As applicable here, section 424.516(a)(2) provides that a supplier must be in “[c]ompliance with Federal and State licensure, certification, and regulatory requirements, as required, based on the type of services or supplies the . . . supplier . . . will furnish and bill Medicare.”

Pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(1), CMS may deny a prospective supplier’s enrollment application if CMS determines that the supplier fails to comply with any enrollment requirements.  Specifically, the regulation authorizes denial of enrollment under the following circumstances:

The provider or supplier is determined to not be in compliance with the enrollment requirements in this subpart P

**Page 4**

or in the enrollment application applicable for its provider or supplier type, and has not submitted a plan of corrective action as outlined in part 488 of this chapter.

42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(1).

**B.  Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Analysis**

***1.  The services of an independent home health caregiver do not qualify as home health services under Medicare Part A or as medical and other health services under Medicare Part B.***

***2.  An individual may only enroll in Medicare to supply covered medical and health services.***

I have read Petitioner’s submissions and considered her arguments.  Petitioner’s position that she should be enrolled as a Medicare supplier reflects a basic misunderstanding of the Medicare program.  Medicare is a statutory health benefit program for elderly and disabled individuals (beneficiaries).  This means that, even though an item or service may be helpful to a beneficiary, if that item or service does not fall within the definition of a Medicare benefit, that item or service is not covered by Medicare.  The Medicare statute also defines the term “supplier” as an individual or entity that “furnishes items or services under [Medicare].”  Act, § 1861(d) (42 U.S.C. § 1395x(d)); *see also US Ultrasound*, DAB No. 2302 at 5 (2010).  Thus, if Petitioner did not or does not furnish items or services that are covered by Medicare, she does not meet the statutory definition of a Medicare supplier.  *See US Ultrasound*, DAB No. 2302 at 5-6.

In the present case, Petitioner represents that she furnishes home health services to two Medicare beneficiaries, B.J. and D.J.1
  *See*CMS Ex. 1 at 26; *see also*Docket Entry #4 in DAB E-File.  However, Petitioner failed to present any evidence that she furnishes or has furnished home health services that are covered by Medicare.  Home health benefits are covered under Medicare Part A.  To be payable under the Medicare Part A home health benefit, all of the following conditions must be satisfied:

The beneficiary must be under the care of a physician who must certify (and periodically recertify) that home health services are required;
	the beneficiary must be confined to his or her home;
	the beneficiary must need a skilled service such as intermittent skilled nursing care or physical or speech therapy; and**Page 5**

a physician must establish and periodically review a plan for furnishing such services to the beneficiary.Act, §§ 1814(a)(2)(C); 1861(m).  Further, payment for home health services under Medicare Part A is made to home health agencies (HHAs), which are providers of services.  Act, §§ 1835(a); 1861(o), (u).  An individual, such as Petitioner, does not qualify to enroll in Medicare as an HHA, as Petitioner appears to acknowledge.  *See*Docket Entry #12 in DAB E-File at 4.  Nor does Petitioner contend that she is employed by a Medicare-participating HHA.2

In addition, health care items or services that do not qualify as home health benefits under Medicare Part A are not eligible for Medicare coverage and payment unless they meet the definition of medical and other health services under Medicare Part B.  *See*Act, § 1861(s); *see also* 42 C.F.R. Part 410.  The majority of medical and other health services covered by Medicare Part B consist of physician services and medical devices and supplies.  *Id.* The services of certain licensed non‐physician practitioners qualify for coverage under Medicare Part B, but those practitioners are specified in the statute and regulations.  *See, e.g.*, 42 C.F.R. § 410.12(a)(2) (Part B services must be furnished by facilities or entities specified in the regulations); 42 C.F.R. § 424.5(a)(2) (services must be furnished by a qualified supplier).  The statute and regulations recognize the following licensed non‐physician practitioners, among others:

physical and occupational therapists (Act, § 1861(s)(2)(D); *see also*Act, § 1861(g), (p); 42 C.F.R. §§ 410.59, 410.60);
	physician assistants (Act, § 1861(s)(2)(K)(i); 42 C.F.R. § 410.74);
	nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists (Act, § 1861(s)(2)(K)(ii); 42 C.F.R. §§ 410.75, 410.76);
	clinical psychologists (Act, § 1861(s)(2)(M); 42 C.F.R. § 410.71);
	clinical social workers (Act, § 1861(s)(2)(N); 42 C.F.R. § 410.73);
	certified registered nurse anesthetists (Act, § 1861(s)(11); 42 C.F.R. § 410.69); and
	speech-language pathologists (Act, § 1861(*ll*); 42 C.F.R. § 410.62).In summary, Medicare Part B does not cover the services of “freelance” home health providers because they are not among the licensed health care practitioners specified in the statute and regulations.  This is so even if Petitioner is licensed as a cosmetologist or phlebotomist.  Enrollment as a Medicare supplier is only available to practitioners and entities that are eligible to submit claims for Medicare-covered items and services.  *See*42 C.F.R. § 424.502 (definition of *Enroll/Enrollment*).  The record is devoid of evidence

**Page 6**

that Petitioner furnished home health services covered under Medicare Part A to B.J., D.J., or to any other Medicare beneficiary.  Nor has Petitioner established that she is licensed to furnish any service covered by Medicare Part B.  Because Petitioner did not and could not furnish home health services covered by Medicare Part A or medical and other health services covered by Medicare Part B to an eligible beneficiary, there is no basis to enroll her as a Medicare supplier.

***3.  CMS had a legal basis to deny Petitioner’s Medicare enrollment application under 42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(1) because Petitioner does not qualify as a non-physician practitioner eligible for enrollment.***

CMS may deny a supplier’s enrollment in the Medicare program if the “supplier is determined to not be in compliance with the enrollment requirements in this subpart P or in the enrollment application applicable for its . . . supplier type, and has not submitted a plan of corrective action as outlined in part 488 of this chapter.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(1).  To qualify for Medicare enrollment, suppliers must provide documentation concerning “[a]ll applicable Federal and State licenses” and “[d]ocumentation associated with regulatory and statutory requirements necessary to establish a . . . supplier’s eligibility to furnish Medicare covered items or services to beneficiaries in the Medicare program.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.510(d)(2)(iii).  Suppliers must be in compliance with Title XVIII of the Act and applicable Medicare regulations as well as federal and state licensure, certification, and regulatory requirements, based on the type of services or supplies the supplier will furnish and bill Medicare.  42 C.F.R. § 424.516(a)(1)-(2).

Based on these authorities, CMS may deny a prospective supplier enrollment if Medicare Part B does not authorize payment for the supplier’s services.  *Erin Wells, IBCLC*, DAB CR4734 at 4 (2016) (citing *Peter McCambridge, C.F.A.*, DAB CR1961 (2009), *aff’d,*DAB No. 2290 (2009)).  As I have explained above, Petitioner is not among the specified licensed non-physician practitioners who are eligible to furnish items or services covered by Medicare Part B.  Therefore, she has not furnished the documentation “necessary to establish [her] eligibility to furnish Medicare covered items or services to beneficiaries in the Medicare program.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.510(d)(2)(iii).  Accordingly, CMS and its contractor had a legal basis to deny Petitioner’s application to enroll as a Medicare supplier.

***4.  I lack authority to grant Petitioner’s additional requests for relief.***

In addition to her request to be enrolled as a Medicare supplier, Petitioner also requests “deposit of . . . funds that are past due into [her] personal [account],” and to have certain Palmetto employees removed from their positions based on what Petitioner characterizes as unethical actions.  *See, e.g.*, Docket Entry #10 in DAB E-File at 3.

**Page 7**

Regarding Petitioner’s request for payment, I do not have jurisdiction to consider whether Medicare claims are covered and payable.  Claims appeals are heard by administrative law judges of the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals.  *See*42 C.F.R. Part 405, Subpart I.

Regarding Petitioner’s complaints about the actions of Palmetto employees, based on the record before me, I see no evidence of improper actions by such employees.  However, even if some impropriety occurred, that would be a matter between CMS and its contractor.  The only matter properly before me is whether CMS had a lawful basis to deny Petitioner’s enrollment application.  42 C.F.R. § 498.3(b)(17).  I therefore lack jurisdiction over Petitioner’s additional requests for relief.

V.  Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, I affirm CMS’s determination to deny Petitioner’s application for Medicare enrollment and billing privileges.


          /s/
        Leslie A. Weyn

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. I refer to the beneficiaries by their initials to protect their privacy. back to note 1
                      2. If she were providing services to Medicare beneficiaries as an employee of a HHA, Petitioner would be paid by the HHA and not by Medicare directly. back to note 2 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back