alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[No. 278-3.

Division Three.

January 25, 1972.]

#### Northwest Business Investment Corporation *et al., Respondents,*v. Albert H. Farmer, *Appellant.*
H. Res. 305

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

November 15, 1993.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 2401) to authorize appropriations for fiscal

year 1994 for military activities of the Department of Defense, to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year

1994, and for other purposes. All points of order against the

conference report and against its consideration are waived.

The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 99.25





CONSENT OF G. H. GIROUX




March 28, 2011





Brigus Gold Corp.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Brigus Gold Corp.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





I hereby consent to (i) the use of my name in connection with the following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 40-F”) of Brigus Gold Corp. (the “Company”) to which this consent relates: (A) the technical report entitled “2006 Resource Estimation Campamento Gold Project on the Ixhuatan Property, Chiapas State, Mexico” dated June 22, 2006 (the “Report”), (B) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2010 and (C) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2010, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-113889 and 333-162558), as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.





Sincerely,




/s/ G. H. GirouxName: G. H. Giroux, MASc, P. Eng.
261 La. 1061

#### Lawrence J. BOUDREAUX, Jr. v. ELITE HOMES, INC.

No. 52409.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 1972.

In re: Elite Homes, Inc. and Bill Dillon applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 259 So.2d 669.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<CIK> 0000053456
<NAME> JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,050,214
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    572,762
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         495,157
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     3,223,013
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,341,146
<COMMON>                                       153,713
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      510,769
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            840,631    <F1>
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,505,113
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          206,500    <F2>
<PREFERRED>                                     37,741
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,133,653
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              92,300
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  95,500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   40,012
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        2,500
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                77,227
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               3,150,600
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,341,146
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      907,914
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            27,984
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     783,502
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     811,486
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         96,428
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               4,204
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 100,632
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        52,790    <F3>
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,842
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      4,802
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   43,040
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        95,000    <F4>
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       87,232
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         139,693
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS OF $425.
<F2> INCLUDES AMOUNT FOR COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
<F2> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $125,000.
<F3> INCLUDES AMOUNT FOR COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
<F3> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $5,350.
<F4> REPRESENTS COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS PAID TO PARENT CORPORATION.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 438 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 438

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a two-
thirds vote to adopt a rule disallowing germane amendments to a bill or 
                              resolution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 1994

 Mr. Portman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                       the Committee on the Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a two-
thirds vote to adopt a rule disallowing germane amendments to a bill or 
                              resolution.

    Resolved, That clause 4 of rule XI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(e) The affirmative vote of two-thirds of those voting, a quorum 
being present, is required to adopt any rule or order reported by the 
Committee on Rules providing for the consideration of any bill or 
resolution that limits the right of Members to offer germane 
amendments, if that bill or resolution would otherwise be subject to 
amendment under House rules.''.

                                 <all>
```
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 359

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses

of investigations and studies by the Committee on Small Business in

the second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1994

Mr. LAFALCE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House

for expenses of investigations and studies by the Committee on Small Business in the second session of the One

Hundred Third Congress.

1 Resolved, That for expenses of investigations and

2 studies by the Committee on Small Business (hereinafter

3 in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), there

4 shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House not

5 more than $1,073,000.

6 SEC. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made

7 on vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the
2

HRES 359 IH

1 chairman of the Committee, and approved by the Commit2 tee on House Administration.

3 SEC. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolu4 tion for investigations and studies carried out during the

5 period beginning at noon on January 3, 1994, and ending

6 immediately before noon on January 3, 1995.

7 SEC. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution

8 shall be expended in accordance with regulations pre9 scribed by the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
H. Res. 285

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

October 26, 1993.

Whereas Polly Klaas was abducted at knifepoint by a stranger who entered her home in Petaluma, California, late at

night on October 1, 1993, while her mother was sleeping

in the adjacent room;

Whereas hundreds of generous volunteers have donated their

time, energy, and funds to the search for Polly by establishing the Polly Klaas Search Center, which has distributed over 7,000,000 flyers with pictures of Polly and her

suspected abductor nationwide;

Whereas the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the

Petaluma Police Department have also dedicated substantial resources and worked tirelessly on the search for

Polly;

Whereas despite the continuing work of the community and

law enforcement agencies, efforts to locate Polly have not

yet succeeded;

Whereas abducted children are often recovered as a direct result of photographs that are distributed nationwide;

Whereas the United States Postal Service is not permitted to

offer free postage for mailings concerning kidnapped children; and
2

•HRES 285 EH

Whereas the Polly Klaas Search Center is currently facing severe financial difficulties due to the high cost of postage:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the Attorney General and the Director

3 of the Federal Bureau of Investigation should cooperate

4 with the United States Postal Service and the Polly Klaas

5 Search Center to use nationwide mailings to disseminate

6 as quickly as possible information concerning the kidnap7 ping of Polly Klaas.

8 SEC. 2. The community of Petaluma, California, the

9 Petaluma Police Department, and the Federal Bureau of

10 Investigation are commended for their hard work on the

11 Polly Klaas kidnapping case.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Fred McMILLIAN, Petitioner, v. POWELL BROTHERS, INC., Heavy Constructors, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 36129.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 24, 1968.

J. H. Kaiser, of Sams, Anderson, Alper & Spencer, Miami, and William F. Daniel, of Cotten, Shivers, Gwynn & Daniel, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Anthony J. Beisler, of Beisler, Thomas & Pearson, Fort Lauderdale, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petition, briefs and argument in this cause we conclude that the commission properly affirmed the deputy’s award of temporary total disability compensation, subject to future determination of permanent disability compensation *5benefits for claimant’s back injury and psychiatric complications.

The writ of certiorari is accordingly discharged.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
263 La. 105

#### Almon JOHNSON et al. v. B. L. SWEAT.

No. 52876.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 19, 1972.

In re: B. L. Sweat and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Vernon. 265 So.2d 801.

Application denied; the judgment complained of is not final.
#### LISTON HOUSTON *vs.*WILLIAM E. JESTER’S Adm’r.

On a certiorari to a judgment *by default*founded on a return of *served*by *leaving a copy at the defendant's place of*abode, the court permitted proof to be given that the defendant did not reside in the state.

Certiorari to Justice Hammersley.

The judgment was by default, and the question was upon the regularity of the service of the summons.

*Frame,*for plaintiff in error.

*Buffington,*for defendant in error.

*The Court*

decided that it was not necessary for the constable’s return to set forth that the copy was left at the defendant’s place of abode *in the presence of a member of his family.*A return of “ served by leaving a copy at the defendant’s place of abode” is sufficient. *Gibbons*vs. *Mason,*1 *Harr. Rep.*452.

The defendant below now made affidavit that he was not an inhabitant of the state at the time of the alledged service; and the judgment was reversed on this ground. The affidavit was not denied ; if it had been, the court would have ordered testimony to be taken by deposition on this point.

The act of assembly provides, section 3, *(Dig.*332,) that “ service by leaving a copy shall *not be*made and shall not be of any effect, unless the defendant shall at the time of such service be an inhabitant of, and have a known place of abode in the county wherein the proceeding shall be.”

Judgment reversed.
EXHIBIT 15





To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Gerber Scientific, Inc.


            Re: Registration Statements on Form S-8,
                File No. 2-93695, No. 33-58668,
                No. 333-261777, No. 333-42879,
                No. 333-81447, and No. 333-83463

                Registration Statement on Form S-3,
                File No. 33-58670


With   respect   to  the  subject  Registration  Statements,   we
acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report  dated
August  18,  1999  related  to our review  of  interim  financial
information.

Pursuant  to  Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act, such  reports
are not considered a part of a Registration Statement prepared or
certified  by an accountant or a report prepared or certified  by
an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



/s/ KPMG LLP


Hartford, Connecticut
September 7, 1999
#### Maston G. O’NEAL, Jr., Appellant, v. Edwin H. HALLETT, Appellee.

No. 69-676.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 3, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Paul HAYNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-689.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 11, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7296** 

ARTHUR R. CARTER , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. WARDEN, FCI Edgefield , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken
. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv - 01257

- TMC )

Submitted : December 11, 2012 Decided: December 20, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Arthur R. Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Arthur R. Carter , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denyin g relief on hi s 28 U.S.C. A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2012) p etition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. Warden , No. 1:12

- cv 01257

- TMC (D.S.C. July 25, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### Annette Duplechan WALL and Sidney Wall v. George MURRELL and Joyce Murrell.

No. 53894.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 14, 1973.

In re: Annette Duplechan Wall and Sidney Wall, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the court of appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 280 So.2d 865.

Writ denied. On the facts found, the judgment of the Court of Appeal is correct.

DIXON, J., concurring in the denial.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 340

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses

of investigations and studies by the Committee on Agriculture in the

second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1994

Mr. DE LA GARZA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House

for expenses of investigations and studies by the Committee on Agriculture in the second session of the One

Hundred Third Congress.

1 Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and

2 studies by the Committee on Agriculture (hereinafter in

3 this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including

4 expenses for—

5 (1) procurement of consultant services under

6 section 202(i) of the Legislative Reorganization Act

7 of 1946; and
2

HRES 340 IH

1 (2) provision of assistance for members of pro2 fessional staff in obtaining specialized training under

3 section 202(j) of such Act;

4 there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House

5 not more than $2,257,937.00.

6 (b) Not more than $12,000,00 of the amount speci7 fied in subsection (a) may be used for consultant services

8 referred to in paragraph (1) of such subsection and not

9 more than $2,000.00 of such amount may be used for spe10 cialized training referred to in paragraph (2) of such sub11 section.

12 SEC. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made

13 on vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 chairman of the Committee, and approved by the Commit15 tee on House Administration.

16 SEC. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolu17 tion for investigations and studies carried out during the

18 period beginning at noon on January 3, 1994, and ending

19 immediately before noon on January 3, 1995.

20 SEC. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution

21 shall be expended in accordance with regulations pre22 scribed by the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
#### LANDIS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. HEALTH EDUCATION AUTHORITY OF LOUISIANA.

No. 62765.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 15, 1978.

In re: Landis Construction Company, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 359 So.2d 1045.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GeneLink, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Monte E. Taylor, Jr., as
Acting Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods shown in such report.


Date: May 10, 2006                      By: /s/ Monte E. Taylor, Jr.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Monte E. Taylor, Jr.,
                                            Acting Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ellen McDaniel FLOOD.

No. 53153.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1973.

In re: Ellen McDaniel Flood applying for remedial writ and stay order.

Application denied. Under Article 313 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure, the evidence adduced is insufficient to show that the proof of guilt is not evident or presumption great. Hence, the ruling of the trial judge is correct.

BARHAM, J.,

dissents from the refusal to grant writs. As I have previously stated in dissent the *sole original*reason for permitting those charged with “capital offenses” to be denied bail was to insure their appearance at subsequent trial. In fact, appearance for trial is the *sole stated purpose*of bail requirements in any case. As originally enforced and executed the death penalty in “capital cases” meant certain death upon a finding of guilt. Denial of bail in those cases was to secure one who from fear of *certain*death might conceal himself and deny the state a trial for the offense. Time and circumstances have so changed as to make concealment almost impossible. More importantly without the death penalty there is no more reason for one charged with a “capital offense” to depart and conceal himself than for one charged with armed robbery, distribution of narcotics, or some multiple offenses. These defendants pose a greater threat to the safety of the community and society and may be subjected to far more severe sentences than most “capital” offenders. Bail should be permitted here under the showing of the good character and reputation of this defendant. Abolishment of the “capital offense” abolished the restrictions for bail.
[Cite as State v. Chaney, 2017-Ohio-148.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

BUTLER COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2016-06-117 

 : D E C I S I O N 

 - vs - 1/17/2017 

 : 

MATTHEW S. CHANEY, : 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. CR2015-11-1752 

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 

High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for plaintiff-appellee 

Neal D. Schuett, 121 West Main Street, Oxford, Ohio 45056, for defendant-appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of 

the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the 

Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. 

{¶ 2} Counsel for appellant, Matthew S. Chaney, has filed a brief with this court 

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that 

a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the 
Butler CA2016-06-117 

- 2 - 

trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be 

predicated; (2) lists five potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 

744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to 

determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant 

on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief 

and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that 

it is wholly frivolous. 

 M. POWELL, P.J., HENDRICKSON and PIPER, JJ., concur.