alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023024EN.01000701.xml

| 23.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 November 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-166/21) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages - Directive 92/83/EEC - Exemption from the harmonised excise duty - Ethyl alcohol used for the production of medicines - Article 27(1)(d) - Exemption conditional on placing the alcohol under a duty suspension arrangement - No facility to obtain a refund of the excise duty paid - Principle of proportionality)

(2023/C 24/08)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented initially by C. Perrin and M. Siekierzyńska, and subsequently by C. Perrin and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna and A. Kramarczyk-Szaładzińska, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: O. Serdula, M. Smolek and J. Vláčil, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Poland; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Poland;

| 3. | Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 26.4.2021.

---
EX 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of ImageWare Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the periods ending December 31, 2009 and 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, S. James Miller, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date: January 17, 2012

ImageWare Systems, Inc.



By: /s/ S. James Miller, Jr.S. James Miller, Jr.Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2020191EN.01002301.xml

| 8.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/23

---

Action brought on 20 March 2020 — TrekStor v EUIPO — Yuneec Europe (Breeze)

(Case T-158/20)

(2020/C 191/31)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: TrekStor Ltd (Hongkong, China) (Represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch, N. Willich and N. Achilles, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Yuneec Europe GmbH (Kaltenkirchen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark Breeze — Application No 16 369 613

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 January 2020 in Case R 470/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear its own costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
No. 00-955.

#### Hurley et ux. *v.*Motor Coach Industries, Inc.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### Source Categories[1] Emissions (tons/yr)%Cumulative % Hydrochloric Acid Production 2.23E-01 0.05 0.05 Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (MON) 2.99E+00 0.62 0.67 Municipal Landfills 4.00E+02 82.69 83.36 Plastics Materials and Resins Manufacturing [2] 1.21E+01 2.49 85.85 Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production 5.77E+01 11.93 97.77 Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) 3.37E-01 0.07 97.84 Sewage Sludge Incineration 3.17E+00 0.65 98.50 Tire Production 6.76E-02 0.01 98.51 Unsupported Plastics Film & Sheet 7.20E+00 1.49 100.00

Total Emissions483.73 100.00

Foot Notes [1] Chemical Manufacturing: Alkalies and Chloride (not subject to Chlorine Production MACT) were not included in the Nov. 2002 Inventory [2] Plastics Materials and Resins Manufacturing (Nov. 2002 Inventory) was titled Polymers and Resins (I,II,IV) in the May 1999 Report 

### Vinyl Chloride
[No. 379-3.

Division Three.

July 27, 1971.]

#### Mary Ann Kain, *Respondent,*v. John T. Kain, *Petitioner.*

Certiorari to review a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 176791, Raymond F. Kelly, J., entered March 12, 1971. *Remanded*with instructions by unpublished opinion pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Pasquale A. Ambrogio, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the third quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (“Quarterly Report”) of GIANT GROUP, LTD.(“Company” or “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this Quarterly Report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for the periods presented in thisQuarterly Report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Company is made known to us during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period ended of September 30, 2004 covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s independent auditor and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 394 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 394

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 22, 1994.
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that:
            (a) Congress has a constitutional obligation to conduct oversight of 
        matters relating to the operations of the Government, including matters 
        related to any governmental investigations which may, from time to time, 
        be undertaken.
            (b) The Speaker, majority and minority leaders should meet to 
        determine the appropriate timetable, procedures, and forum for 
        appropriate congressional oversight, including hearings on all matters 
        related to ``Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan Association (`MGS&L'), 
        Whitewater Development Corporation and Capital Management Services Inc. 
        (`CMS')''.
            (c) No witness called to testify at these hearings shall be granted 
        immunity under sections 6002 and 6005 of title 18, United States Code, 
        over the objection of Special Counsel Robert B. Fiske, Jr.
            (d) The hearings should be structured and sequenced in such a manner 
        that in the judgment of the leaders they would not interfere with the 
        ongoing investigation of Special Counsel Robert B. Fiske, Jr.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 203 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 203

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 23, 1993.
    Resolved, That during consideration in the Committee of the Whole House on 
the State of the Union of the bill (H.R. 2445) making appropriations for energy 
and water development for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for 
other purposes, all points of order against provisions in the bill for failure 
to comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are waived except as follows: beginning 
on page 35, line 17, through line 25. No amendment affecting the subject of the 
Superconducting Super Collider (other than as part of general reduction of 
amounts provided in the bill) shall be in order except one offered by 
Representative Slattery of Kansas or a designee. That amendment shall be 
debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by its proponent and an 
opponent and shall not be subject to amendment or to a demand for division of 
the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### MILLER YACHT SALES, INC., Petitioner, v. PACEMAKER, INC., a foreign corporation, Respondent.

No. 69-753.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 4, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-83499; File No. SR-BOX-2018-17)]

                    On May 14, 2018, BOX Options Exchange LLC (the “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [1]                                          and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2]                                          a proposed rule change to amend Rules 7150 and 7245 to provide certain account type information in its Price Improvement Period and Complex Price Improvement Period auction notifications. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 31, 2018.[3]                                          The Commission received no comment letters on the proposal. On June 20, 2018, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-BOX-2018-17).                

                        For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[4] 

Eduardo A. Aleman,

Assistant Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             17 CFR 240.19b-4.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                                                     *See*                         Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83317 (May 24, 2018), 83 FR 25074.                    
        Back to Citation      

4.                                 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2018-13886 Filed 6-27-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### Lyle F. Stevenson, Jr., Appellant, v City of Rome et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[656 NYS2d 1022]

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court *947did not err in settling the record in the appeal from the order dismissing the complaint *(Stevenson v City of Rome,*237 AD2d 946 [decided herewith]; *see,*CPLR 5526). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J.—Settle Record.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Doerr, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.
### Appendix V PCE’s for the Alameda Whipsnake

Assessment Endpoint Measure of Ecological Effect (PCE 1) Scrub/shrub communities with a mosaic of open and closed canopy Distribution of EC 25 for monocots (seedling emergence, vegetative vigor, or ECOTOX
Distribution of EC 25 for dicots (seedling emergence, vegetative vigor, or ECOTOX) 

### (PCE 2) Woodland or annual grassland plant communities contiguous to lands containing PCE 1: Distribution of EC 25 for monocots (seedling emergence, vegetative vigor, or ECOTOX
Distribution of EC 25 for dicots (seedling emergence, vegetative vigor, or ECOTOX) 

### (PCE 3) Lands containing rock outcrops, talus, and small mammal burrows within or adjacent to PCE 1 and or PCE 2 Distribution of EC 25 for monocots (seedling emergence, vegetative vigor, or ECOTOX
Distribution of EC 25 for dicots (seedling emergence, vegetative vigor, or ECOTOX)
Most sensitive mammal acute LD 50 (guideline or ECOTOX) Most sensitive mammal chronic NOAEC (guideline or ECOTOX)
#### Dr. Herman EGER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF DENTISTRY, Appellee.

No. 40873.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 16, 1971.

Appeal dismissed. 243 So.2d 653.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles E. Moran, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of SkillSoft Public
      Limited Company; and

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this annual report.

Dated: September 22, 2003                  /s/ Charles E. Moran
                                           --------------------
                                           Charles E. Moran
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       6
#### EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED MISSILES & SPACE COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 81-4542.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 13, 1983.

Philip Sklover, Washington, D.C., argued for plaintiff-appellant; Susan B. Reilly, E.E.O.C., Washington, D.C., on brief.

B. Scott Silverman, San Francisco, Cal., argued for defendant-appellee; Morrison & Foerster, San Francisco, Cal., Ralph A. Hur-vitz, Sunnyvale, Cal., on brief.

Before BROWNING, MERRILL and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In this case the Supreme Court, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 3530, 77 L.Ed.2d 1383, has granted certiorari, has vacated the judgment of this Court, 680 F.2d 1243, and has remanded the case to this Court for further consideration in light of *Newport News*
      *567
      *Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company*v. *EEOC,*462 U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 2622, 77 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983).

The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to that Court for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court decision in *Newport News.*
# C_2021382EN.01002402.xml

| 20.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/24

---

Order of the President of the Court of 24 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Nokia Technologies Oy v Daimler AG, in the presence of: Continental Automotive GmbH and Others

(Case C-182/21) (1)

(2021/C 382/34)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 28.6.2021.

---
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 588

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to provide for transition

salary continuation for certain committee staff.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 29, 1994

Mr. MINETA submitted the following resolution; which was referred jointly to

the Committees on Rules and House Administration

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

provide for transition salary continuation for certain

committee staff.

1 Resolved, That clause 6 of rule XI of the Rules of

2 the House of Representatives is amended by adding at the

3 end the following new paragraph:

4 ‘‘(j)(1) For purposes of this paragraph:

5 ‘‘(A) The term ‘committee’ means a standing,

6 select, or special committee, or commission of the

7 House, or a joint committee of the Congress whose

8 funds are disbursed by the Clerk of the House.

9 ‘‘(B) The term ‘eligible staff member’ means an

10 individual employed by a committee or subcommittee
2

•HRES 588 IH

1 thereof for at least 183 days (whether or not service

2 was continuous) prior to the termination of employ3 ment as described in subdivision (C) and whose pay

4 is disbursed by the Clerk of the House.

5 ‘‘(C) The term ‘displaced staff member’ means

6 an eligible staff member whose service as an em7 ployee of the House is terminated solely and directly

8 as a result of a change in the political party of the

9 individual occupying the position of chairman or

10 ranking minority member of a committee and who is

11 certified as a displaced staff member by the chair12 man and ranking minority member of the committee

13 to the Clerk of the House. Such certification shall be

14 made no later than 60 days after the date of such

15 change.

16 ‘‘(2) The Clerk of the House shall notify the Commit17 tee on House Administration of the name of each dis18 placed staff member.

19 ‘‘(3)(A) Each displaced staff member shall, upon ap20 plication to the Clerk of the House and approval by the

21 Committee on House Administration, continue to be paid

22 at his respective salary for a period not to exceed 60 days

23 following the staff member’s date of termination or until

24 the staff member becomes otherwise gainfully employed,

25 whichever is earlier.
3

•HRES 588 IH

1 ‘‘(B) A statement in writing by any such employee

2 that he was not gainfully employed during such period or

3 the portion thereof for which payment is claimed shall be

4 accepted as prima facie evidence that he was not so em5 ployed.

6 ‘‘(4) Funds necessary to carry out this paragraph

7 shall be available from the contingent fund of the House.’’.

Æ
#### GEORGE HOUSTON and wife *vs.*JAMES JAMISON’S Adm’r.

•Interest may be recovered on arrears 'of an annuity -given in lieu of dower, though there be a power -of distress.

'This was an action of debt on a deed securing an annuity to Mrs. Houston in lieu of dower, to recover the arrears, ¡and interest. The deed contained a clause of distress.

The question was whether the plaintiff could recover interest on the arrears of an annnity which was granted in lieu of dower, and *Beeson’s Ex’r.,*vs. *Beeson’s Jldm’rs.*1 *Harr. Rep.*106, and *Waples*vs. *Waples, Ibid*392, *(n.)*were cited.

*W. H. Rogers,*for plaintiff.

*Gray,*for defendant.

*Mr. Gray*

submitted that although interest might be recovered in the cases cited, where the party had no right of distress, ’he. should not recover interest where he bad that remedy; in analogy to the decisions which have been made refusing interest in the action of replevin on a distress for rent arrear.

But the *Court*said, the only reason why the general principle allowing interest as it is adopted in this country, had not been applied to the case referred to, was from the peculiar language, of the act-of assembly. *(Dig.*364.)

Verdict for arrears and interest.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 67

Designating membership on certain standing committees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. HOYER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating membership on certain standing committees.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members, Resi2 dent Commissioner, and Delegates, be, and they are here3 by, elected to the following standing committees of the

4 House of Representatives:

5 COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Pat Williams, Mon6 tana; and Blanche M. Lambert, Arkansas.

7 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS: Floyd

8 H. Flake, New York; James A. Hayes, Louisiana; Craig

9 A. Washington, Texas; Barbara-Rose Collins, Michigan;

10 Corrine Brown, Florida; Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky,

11 Pennsylvania; Lynn C. Woolsey, California; [vacancy]; and

12 [vacancy].
2

HRES 67 ATH

1 COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Maxine Waters,

2 California; and [vacancy].

3 COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT:

4 Jim McDermott, Washington, Chairman; George (Buddy)

5 Darden, Georgia; Benjamin L. Cardin, Maryland; Kweisi

6 Mfume, Maryland; Robert A. Borski, Pennsylvania; and

7 Thomas C. Sawyer, Ohio.

Æ