Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2020
                              Emilio Francisco Montero, M.D.,P.A., DAB CR5553 (2020)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Emilio Francisco Montero, M.D.,P.A., DAB CR5553 (2020)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Emilio Francisco Montero, M.D., P.A.,
	(PTAN: ED228A)
	(NPI: 1932411063),
	Petitioner,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-17-886Decision No. CR5553March 6, 2020

        
              
    

      DECISION
Petitioner, Emilio Francisco Montero, M.D., P.A., is a psychiatrist, practicing in Florida, who, until recently, participated in the Medicare program.  The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has revoked his billing privileges, citing abusive billing practices; specifically, CMS charges that he billed for services to Medicare beneficiaries who were dead at the time those services were ostensibly provided.
Petitioner appeals.  CMS has moved for summary judgment.  I agree that this case presents no genuine issue of material fact and that CMS is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.  The undisputed evidence establishes that Petitioner Montero repeatedly billed the Medicare program for services he could not have provided because the beneficiaries to whom the services were purportedly provided were no longer living.  CMS therefore properly revoked his billing privileges.
Page 2
Background
By letter dated October 11, 2016, CMS advised Petitioner that his Medicare billing privileges were revoked effective November 10, 2016, because he billed for services purportedly provided to 15 Medicare beneficiaries between March 3, 2014, and March 14, 2016, but those beneficiaries were deceased on the dates of service.  In doing so, Petitioner violated 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(8)(i).  CMS Ex. 1.  Attached to the notice was a list of the 15 Medicare beneficiaries whom CMS identified as deceased on the dates of service, along with the billed dates of service and the dates of the beneficiaries’ deaths.  CMS Ex. 1 at 3-4.  Pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(c), the contractor also imposed a three-year re-enrollment bar.  CMS Ex. 1 at 2.
Petitioner requested reconsideration.  CMS Ex. 2.  In a reconsidered determination, dated March 13, 2017, the CMS hearing officer found that Petitioner had submitted claims for 15 beneficiaries who were dead on the purported dates of service, and she upheld the revocation.  CMS Ex. 3.
Petitioner appealed, and CMS has moved for summary judgment.
With its memorandum in support of summary judgment (CMS Br.), CMS submits seven exhibits (CMS Exs. 1-7).  Petitioner submits a response to CMS’s motion (P. Br.), accompanied by five exhibits (P. Exs. 1-5).
Discussion
***The parties agree that Petitioner billed the Medicare program for services that he could not have provided because the beneficiaries to whom the services were purportedly provided were no longer living.  CMS therefore properly revoked Petitioner’s Medicare enrollment pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(8).1***
**Program rules**. CMS regulates the Medicare enrollment of providers and suppliers.  Social Security Act (Act) § 1866(j)(1)(A).  It may revoke a supplier’s billing privileges if he abuses them by submitting a claim or claims for services that he could not have furnished to a specific individual on the date of service, such as “where the beneficiary is deceased.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(8)(i)(A).  If a supplier’s billing privileges have been
Page 3
revoked, CMS must bar his re-enrollment for at least one year, but for no more than three years, depending on the severity of the basis for revocation.  42 C.F.R. § 424.535(c)(1).2
**Summary judgment**. The Departmental Appeals Board has, on multiple occasions, discussed the well-settled principles governing summary judgment.  *See*, *e.g*., *1866ICPayday.com, L.L.C.*, DAB No. 2289 at 2-3 (2009).  Summary judgment is appropriate if a case presents no genuine issue of material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.  *Donald W. Hayes, D.P.M*., DAB No. 2862 at 7-8 (2018); *1866ICPayday*, DAB No. 2289 at 2; *Illinois Knights Templar Home*, DAB No. 2274 at 3-4 (2009), and cases cited therein.  Here, Petitioner concedes that his employee billed the Medicare program for services that he could not have provided (and did not provide) because the beneficiaries identified in the billings were dead.  Because these dispositive facts are not in dispute, CMS is entitled to summary judgment.  *See* *Zille Shah, M.D. and Zille Huma Zaim, M.D., PA*, DAB No. 2688 at 5-6 (2016); *Mohammad Nawaz, M.D., and Mohammad Zaim, M.D., PA*, DAB No. 2687 at 5 (2016).
**The erroneous billing**. Petitioner Montero is a psychiatrist with a practice in Florida. The parties agree that, between March 3, 2014, and March 14, 2016, he – or his employee, on his behalf – submitted 32 Medicare claims for services ostensibly provided to 15 beneficiaries.  However, he could not have provided the services because the beneficiaries were dead on the billed dates of service.  CMS Ex. 1 at 3-4; CMS Exs. 4-7; P. Br. at 2 (“[T]he prohibited billings that were the cause of the Medicare revocation were made by his longtime employee”); P. Ex. 3 at 1 (Montero Decl. ¶ 4) (“After March 2016, I discovered that Mrs. Hendrix had improperly billed Medicare for a few patients.  At the time, I believed that such improper billing was careless and a mistake”).
Thirty-two erroneous claims justify revoking a supplier’s Medicare enrollment.  Indeed, the plain language of the regulation authorizes CMS to revoke billing privileges based on a single claim.  42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(8)(i) (authorizing revocation if the supplier submits “*a claim* or claims for services that could not have been furnished . . .”).  CMS, however, has indicated that it will not revoke billing privileges unless its finds at least three instances of abusive billing practices.  73 Fed. Reg. 36,448, 36,455 (June 27, 2008); *see John M. Shimko, D.P.M.*, DAB No. 2689 (2016) (upholding a revocation based on 19 claims for services associated with 12 beneficiaries on 18 dates of service and concluding that nothing in the language of the regulation or its preamble suggests that CMS must find a minimum claims error rate before revoking billing privileges under section 424.535(a)(8)).
Petitioner blames his employee, whom he fired in October 2016.  Initially, he asserted that, without his knowledge, she “became quite careless and mistaken in her billings on a few occasions.”  P. Ex. 1 at 2.  He now maintains that she was also stealing from his
Page 4
medical practice, and her improper billing may have been purposeful (although he concedes that he does not know why she would have intentionally submitted false claims).  P. Ex. 3 at 1 (Montero Decl. ¶¶ 4, 6, 7).  Purposeful or inadvertent, a physician is responsible for claims submitted on his behalf or at his direction.  His efforts to assign blame elsewhere “do not relieve him of his responsibility for the improper claims or bar CMS from revoking his billing privileges.”  *Howard B. Reife, D.P.M.*, DAB No. 2527 at 8 (2013).
Conclusion
The undisputed evidence establishes that Petitioner Montero, or his employee on his behalf, repeatedly billed the Medicare program for services that he could not have provided because the beneficiaries were dead on the purported dates of service.  CMS therefore properly revoked his billing privileges and is entitled to summary judgment.


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law. back to note 1
                      2. I cite to the regulation in effect on the date of the initial determination. back to note 2 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back