alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
History: 

Conrad: 

Your request for information related to the 18 month extension for additional 

sampling from Eramet and Felman 

Troy Hillier to: Conrad Chin 06/05/2012 04:50PM 

"jrego@JonesDay.com", "jeff.mckinney@erametgroup.com" 

Cc: , "Amy M. Lincoln", "rlunn@fpiwv.com", "jkonrady@fpiwv.com" 

, Chuck French, "epamail.epa.gov," 

This message has been replied to and forwarded. 

Thank you for your request following up on our meeting on May first. 

Our team is working on putting the issues with the existing database as well as our plan for addressing those issues into a written form that we can submit to you. 

Since we met, both companies have been working with outside consultants to develop sampling plans to address the data gaps we discussed in our meeting. In addition, both companies have been working with outside engineering firms to explore alternative control strategies for process fugitives. 

All three of these efforts are intended to be complete and through sufficient internal review that we can submit them to you by June 29th. We would like to meet with you and your team again soon after to discuss the proposals. We think the concrete plans will bolster the case for additional time, so we would like to get your input on those plans so that we can make the best case for the additional time for sampling. 

I will follow up with you in the next day or two. 

In the mean time, if you have any questions, I can be reached at 202-669-7832. 

Thank you again for your attention to this issue. 

Troy Hillier 

Policy Navigation Group
Exhibit 99



Supplemental Segment Information

|(In thousands)                     | Quarter ended
      July 31,
|---------------------------------- | ----------------------------
|                                   | 2006                        
|Orders Received:                   |                             
|Sign Making and Specialty Graphics | $  73,867                   
|Apparel and Flexible Materials     | 47,063                      
|Ophthalmic Lens Processing         | 18,382                      
|                                   | $139,312                    







|                                   | July 31,2006 | April 30,2006
|---------------------------------- | ------------ | -------------
|Backlog:                           |              |              
|Sign Making and Specialty Graphics | $  3,407     | $  2,699     
|Apparel and Flexible Materials     | 41,034       | 40,514       
|Ophthalmic Lens Processing         | 953          | 357          
|                                   | $45,394      | $43,570
EXHIBIT 99.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 OF the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Endocardial Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Robert Paulson, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | /s/J. ROBERT PAULSON, JR.J. Robert Paulson, Jr. Chief Financial
OfficerApril 10, 2003
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
AerialZeus, LLC

Request to amendments to FAA 333 exemption

Exemption No. 11939 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–1398

Contact:

Mr. Luis Robles 

CEO AerialZeus, 

LLC 1325 Howe Avenue, 

Suite 213 Sacramento, 

CA 95825
Dear Sir or Madam,

AerialZeus LLC is requesting amendments to their existing 333 exemption as listed and 

described below. The purpose for the amendments is to be able to offer the additional services

alongside the services listed in the existing 333 exemption. Each amendment will serve to 

increase the functionality and usefulness of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) and the increased 

functionality will serve to create safer working environments in the industries in which they are 

deployed.

1. Additional Aircraft

AerialZeus would like to add an additional UASs to the existing exemption. The new aircrafts 

are listed on the new Approved Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Make/Model under section 

333, issued by the Federal Aviation Agency FAA

(HTTPS://WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV/#!DOCUMENTDETAIL;D=FAA-2007-3330-0007).

The new aircrafts include;

• 3D Robotics Solo, listed under number 11

• 3D Robotics Spektre, listed under number 13

• Aeromao AeroMapper 300, listed under number 63

• Aeromao Aeromapper EV2, listed under number 64

• AeroVironment Puma, listed under number 85

• DJI Phantom 4, listed under number 347

• DJI Spreading Wings S900, listed under number 349

• Draganflyer X8, listed under number 368 

• Precision Hawk Lancaster, listed under number 737

• Parrot AR.Drone 2.0, listed under number 739

• SenseFly eBee RTK, listed under number 820

• SenseFly eXom, listed under number 821

2. Additional Sensor

AerialZeus would like to implement LiDAR sensors as to increase 3D-mapping precision and 

volumetric imaging.

3. Additional organizations and industries

AerialZeus would also like to be approved to provide services to other state and private agencies. 

By utilization of aforementioned UAS, and sensors already approved in exemption no. 11939, 

AerialZeus would offer services in the following areas;

• Bridge inspection

• Gas and oil pipeline inspection
• Powerline Inspection

• Solar panel and wind turbines inspection

• Open mine and pit excavation site mapping

• Open mine and pit excavation volumetric-analysis

• Construction site monitoring/Surveying and Topographic Mapping 

• Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation

• Agricultural support to Farmers and R&D institutions 

The listed industries have constant need for regular inspections and monitoring, that either puts 

inspecting personnel in highly risky environments. Therefore, AerialZeus intends to improve the 

quality of data collected, cut costs, and improve safety.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Russell, Appellant.

[656 NYS2d 952]

Mercure, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.), rendered June 24, 1996, convicting defendant *842upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

While an inmate at Franklin Correctional Facility in Franklin County, defendant was found to be in possession of a metal shank. He subsequently pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of l2/3 to 31/3 years, to be served consecutively to the sentence he was serving at the time he committed this crime. On appeal, defendant argues that his guilty plea should be vacated because it was coerced.

Initially, inasmuch as defendant did not move to withdraw his guilty plea or vacate the judgment of conviction, he has waived his right to claim on appeal that his guilty plea was coerced (see, *People v Murray,*233 AD2d 956; *People v Sloan,*228 AD2d 976, *lv denied*88 NY2d 994). Nevertheless, were we to consider the merits, we would find the claim to be without merit. The record discloses that County Court carefully explained to defendant the ramifications of pleading guilty, including the fact that he would be giving up the right to appeal everything except the sentence. Defendant responded that he understood, that he was not forced or threatened into making the plea, and that he was not under the influence of alcohol or medication. We find the colloquy between the court and defendant sufficient to establish that the guilty plea was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made *(see, People v Berezansky,*229 AD2d 768). Therefore, we decline to disturb the judgment of conviction.

Cardona, P. J., Casey, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1(b)

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-99070) pertaining to the Chicago Miniature Lamp, Inc. 1995
Incentive and Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 28,
2000, with respect to the financial statements of Chicago Miniature Lamp
(Canada), Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of SLI, Inc. for the
year ended January 2, 2000.


Hards Pearson

Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Chartered Accountants
March 17, 2000





                                                                               2
# C_2020262EN.01003502.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/35

---

Action brought on 23 June 2020 — DK Company v EUIPO — Hunter Boot (DENIM HUNTER)

(Case T-387/20)

(2020/C 262/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: DK Company A/S (Ikast, Denmark) (represented by: S. Hansen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hunter Boot Ltd (Edinburgh, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark DENIM HUNTER — Application for registration No 14 649 891

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 April 2020 in Case R 849/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | reverse the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

reverse the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | order EUIPO to bear the costs including cost incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear the costs including cost incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | The Board of Appeal has erred in the assessment of the consequence of the (administrative) limitation of the goods in the applicant’s trademark application, and the impact of the figurative element in the applicant’s mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal has erred in the assessment of the consequence of the (administrative) limitation of the goods in the applicant’s trademark application, and the impact of the figurative element in the applicant’s mark;

| — | The Board of Appeal completely ignored the fact that the General Court had already assessed the distinctiveness of the word ‘HUNTER’ for goods in class 25. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal completely ignored the fact that the General Court had already assessed the distinctiveness of the word ‘HUNTER’ for goods in class 25.

---
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert MATTHEWS v. Lewis S. DOHERTY, III, Judge, Nineteenth Judicial District Court. East Baton Rouge Parish.

No. 62697.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 15, 1978.

In re: Robert Matthews applying for writ of mandamus. East Baton Rouge Parish.

Writ denied. Moot. District Judge has ruled.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2013

p1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2013

147679

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147679

COA: 306951

Wayne CC: 11

- 004605

- FC

ELIJAH DUJAUN KEY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 16, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the

case of People v Eliason (Docket No. 147428) is pending on appeal before this Court and

tha t the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the

decision in that case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ORBIT
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000937814
<NAME>                                         Orbit Technologies
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              82
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    82
<PP&E>                                             335
<DEPRECIATION>                                     315
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              169
<BONDS>                                          3,489
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           368
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,689)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       169
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (400)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (635)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (635)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (635)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.02)


</TABLE>
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 362

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the action taken

by the Government of France against seafood imports from United States

is a totally unwarranted act of protectionism.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1994

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. STUDDS, and Mr.

TORKILDSEN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred

jointly to the Committees on Ways and Means and Foreign Affairs

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the action taken by the Government of France against

seafood imports from United States is a totally unwarranted act of protectionism.

Whereas France’s effective embargo by harassment of seafood imports from the United States violates international trade obligations and raises questions about the

usefulness of entering into trade agreements with the European Union and France: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) calls upon the Government of France to

3 stop immediately its embargo and harassment of im4 ports of seafood from the United States;
2

•HRES 362 IH

1 (2) demands that the Government of France

2 compensate United States companies that have had

3 seafood products damaged by its actions; and

4 (3) calls upon the President to identify areas in

5 which appropriate forms of retaliation could be

6 taken against the Government of France for its

7 egregious violation of international trade agree8 ments.

Æ
#### Henry Luke EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-47.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 22, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

I, Frank A. Lodzinski, certify that:

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GeoResources, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank A. Lodzinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Frank A. LodzinskiFrank A. LodzinskiChief Executive OfficerMay 13, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 131 (Monday, July 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14717]



[[Page 31783]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; National Science Board

    The National Science Board, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR 
part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 
1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), 
hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the 
transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

TIME AND DATE: Closed teleconference of the Committee on Strategy of 
the National Science Board, to be held Friday, July 13, 2018 from 3:00 
p.m. to 4:00 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National 
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.

STATUS: Closed

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Chair's opening remarks; discussion of FY 
2020 NSF budget request.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Kathy Jacquart, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. 
Telephone: (703) 292-7000. You may find meeting information and updates 
(time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) at https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/notices.jsp#sunshine.

Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2018-14717 Filed 7-5-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Order entered February 3, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00945

- CR

DESHAUN LANELL CLARK , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 20 4 th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 19

- 53238

- Q



### O RDER

Before the Court is the State ’ s January 29, 2020 motion for extension of time to file its

brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the State ’ s brief due February 28, 202 0. This case

is currently at issue

.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 454 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 173
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 454

                          [Report No. 103-546]

  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 4556) making 
    appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related 
 agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 1994

    Mr. Gordon, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 

    Resolved, That points of order against consideration of the bill 
(H.R. 4556) making appropriations for the Department of Transportation 
and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and 
for other purposes, for failure to comply with clause 2(l)(6) of rule 
XI or clause 7 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of the 
bill, all points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to 
comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are waived except as follows: 
beginning on page 53, line 9, through page 54, line 22.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 173

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 454

                          [Report No. 103-546]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 4556) making 
    appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related 
 agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 14, 1994

       Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Secured Digital Applications,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December  31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Patrick Soon-Hock Lim, Chief Executive Officer (principal  executive officer) of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
--------------------------
Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
Chief Executive Officer
April 10, 2006