alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

 

 

# SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

 

1.                                       XImageCorporation, a California corporation

 

2.                                       ImageWareSystems ID Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation

(formerlyImaging Technology Corporation)

 

3.                                       I.W. SystemsCanada Company, a Nova Scotia unlimited liability company

 

4.                                       ImageWareDigital Photography Systems, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (formerlyCastleworks LLC)

 

5.                                       E-FocusWest LLC, a Nevada limited liability company

 

6.                                       G&AImaging, Inc., a Nevada corporation

 

7.                                       DigitalImaging International GmbH, a company formed under German laws

 

8.                                       DigitalImaging Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., a company formed under Singapore laws

 

 

----
# C_2023112EN.01000402.xml

| 27.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Euler Hermes SA Magyarországi Fióktelepe v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

(Case C-482/21, (1) Euler Hermes)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 90 - Taxable amount - Reduction - Insurer paying compensation to policyholders for unpaid debts, including VAT - National legislation denying that insurer, as legal successor, the reduction of the taxable amount - Principle of fiscal neutrality - Principle of effectiveness)

(2023/C 112/05)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Euler Hermes SA Magyarországi Fióktelepe

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Operative part of the judgment

Article 90(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2010/45/EU of 13 July 2010, and the principle of fiscal neutrality

must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State under which the reduction of the taxable amount in the event of non-payment, provided for in that provision, is not applied to an insurer who, under a contract for the insurance of trade debts, pays the insured person, by way of compensation following non-payment of a debt, part of the taxable amount of the taxable transaction at issue including value added tax, even though, pursuant to that contract, that part of the debt together with all associated rights have been assigned to that insurer.

---

(1)  OJ C 471, 22.11.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,188,257
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,892,667
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,435,080)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,189,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,715,909
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,996,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,189,106
<SALES>                                      1,413,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,588,248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             249,920
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                116,736
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            116,736
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   116,736
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Apr 2023
256 La. 874

#### Kenneth N. BENOIT v. AMERICAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON.

No. 50759.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 30, 1970.

In re: American Mutual Insurance Company of Boston applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 236 So.2d 674.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error in the judgment complained of.

McCALEB, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted.
#### The Industrial Commission *v.*Smith.

*'Workmen’s Compensation*— Appeal *to Common Pleas Court*— ■ *Evidence not limited to record*— Section *1465-90, General Code*— Pending *actions*— Rehearing *6y industrial commission.*

(No. 18256

Decided May 13, 1924.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Perry county.

*Mr. Vincent Tague,*prosecuting attorney; *Mr. C. C. Crabhe,*attorney general, and *Mr. R. R. Zurmehly,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Tom O. Crossan*and *Mr. Paul Tague,*for defendant in error.

This cause is reversed upon the authority of *Industrial Commission of Ohio*v. *Vail, ante,*304.

The record of the proceedings of the Industrial Commission disclosing that subsequent to March 11, 1921, the date when it determined that the injury resulting in the death of the husband of the de*666fendant in error was not sustained in the course of and arising out of his employment, the commission entered upon and held a rehearing, the commission will not be heard to say that a rehearing was not granted.

*Judgment reversed.*

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.

Wanamaker, J., not participating.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         213,165
<SECURITIES>                                     5,272
<RECEIVABLES>                                  461,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    304,829
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,000,666
<PP&E>                                      18,781,202
<DEPRECIATION>                            (13,841,119)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,125,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,030,299
<BONDS>                                        836,191
<COMMON>                                        40,357
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,079,635
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,125,482
<SALES>                                      2,102,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,104,731
<CGS>                                        1,066,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,698,861
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              96,054
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                317,943
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            301,943
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   301,943
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
|EXHIBIT 31.2                   
|-------------------------------
|                               
|CERTIFICATION                  
|                               
|I, Danny W. Huff, certify that:
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               
|                               



---

|                    |                                                                                                                                          | b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |                                                                                                                                          |                                                                                                                                                                              
|                    |                                                                                                                                          |                                                                                                                                                                              
|                    |                                                                                                                                          |                                                                                                                                                                              
|Date: July 29, 2004
|                    |                                                                                                                                          |                                                                                                                                                                              
|                    | /s/ DANNY W. HUFF                                     
Danny W. Huff
Executive Vice President -- Finance
    and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Wayne Wetherell, Chief Financial Officerof ImageWare Systems, Inc. (the ***“Company”***), hereby certifies that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

1.                The Company’s annual report on Form10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the ***“Report”***) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company atthe end of the periods covered by the Report and the results of operations ofthe Company for the periods covered by the Report.

 

 
| Dated:   March  31, 2005 |
|----------------------------------------------|
|                                         |
| / s/  Wayne Wetherell                        |   |
| Wayne  Wetherell                             |
| Chief  Financial Officer                     |

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to ImageWare Systems, Inc. and willbe retained by ImageWare Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
#### Craig *v.*State.

(Division B.

March 11, 1935.)

[160 So. 284.

No. 31576.]

W. C. and J. 0. Eastland, of Buleville, for appellant.

*287W. D. Conn, Jr., Assistant Attorney-General, for the state.

Argued orálly by W. C. Eastland, for appellant, and by W. D. Conn, Jr., for the state.

Ethridge, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant, Richard Craig, was indicted for murder •and convicted of manslaughter of one George Rawls, and sentenced to. serve five years in the penitentiary, from which he appeals.

It appears that on the night prior to the killing, George Rawls, the deceased, went to the home of the appellant and was guilty of vicious conduct, having whipped appellant and his sister, who lived with appellant and his wife, and otherwise misbehaved.

*288The appellant was hostler on the plantation of Mrs. Kimbrough in Sunflower county, and, on the morning of the killing, two sons of the deceased and a third party came to the barn where the appellant was working and wanted some farm implements, and they testified that Craig had a pistol and stated that if he had had it the night before he would have used it on the deceased. The two sons of the deceased and the third party undertook to and did take the pistol away from the appellant, and during the scuffle appellant’s wife and mother ran out screaming, one having an axe and the other a fork, to aid the appellant.

The deceased came from the field during this mélée and took the pistol from his sons who had taken it from the appellant, and ordered them back to the field. According to some of the evidence, the deceased was approaching the appellant, and according to other evidence, he was approaching the house, when the appellant seized the pistol, which the deceased had placed in his pocket, and shot. The evidence is conflicting just how the shooting occurred. According- to the state’s evidence, the appellant approached the deceased from behind and seized the pistol and, as the deceased faced him, shot him in the side, and continued to shoot until he was killed, shooting him four times. According to the testimony of the appellant, he grabbed the pistol from the deceased, who made a move as though he was drawing another weapon, and appellant then shot him and continued to shoot until four shots were fired, from which George Bawls died.

In our opinion, it is not necessary to go into the details of the killing and what subsequently occurred. It is sufficient to state that we have carefully examined the record in all its aspects, including the instructions of the court, and we think there is no¡ reversible error. The jury was warranted in finding the appellant guilty of manslaughter. The judgment of the court below will, therefore, be affirmed.

Affirmed.
National Advisory Council for

Environmental Policy and Technology

Teleconference AGENDA

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

3:00 p.m.

– 6:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time

Call

- in number: 1

- 866

- 299

- 3188, Code: 202233006 8

1201 Constitution Ave, NW

EPA East Building, Room 1132

Washington, DC 20004

Purpose : To discuss and approve draft NACEPT recommendations addressing two topics: 1) the

need for technologies that can help address environmental problems experienced by

environmental justice communities and other vulnerable populations, and 2) leadership

development and organizational transformation at EPA.

3 :00 p.m. Welcome and Introd uctions

 Mark Joyce, NACEPT Acting Designated Federal Officer

3 : 10 p.m. Overview of Agenda and Ground Rul es for Teleconference

 Dr. James H. Johnson, Jr., NACEPT Chair

3 :1 5 p.m. Overview of NACEPT Vulnerable Populations Advice Letter

 Dr. D e W itt John and Dr. Mark A. Mitchell

, NACEPT Vulnerable

Populations Workgroup Co

- Chair s

3 : 4 5 p.m. Public Comments on NACEPT Vulnerable Populations Advice Letter

4 : 00 p.m. Discussion and Approval of NACEPT Vulnerable Populations Advice Letter

 Dr. James H. Johnson

, Jr., NACEPT Chair

4:30 p.m. Overview of Fourth NACEPT Advice Letter on EPA Workforce Planning:

Leadership Development and Organizational Transformation

 Leah Ann Lamb

, NACEPT Leadership Workgroup Chair5:00 p.m. Public Comments on Fourth NACEPT Advice Letter on EPA Workforce

Planning: Leadership Development and Organizational Transformation

5: 15 p.m. Discussion and Approval of Fourth NACEPT Advice Letter on EPA

Workforce Planning: Leadership Development and Organizational

Transformation

 Dr. James H. Johnson, Jr., NACEPT Chair

5 : 45 p.m. Closing Remarks

 Dr. James H. Johnson, Jr., NACEPT Chair

6:00 ADJOURN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          28,877
<SECURITIES>                                    36,038
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,885
<ALLOWANCES>                                       900
<INVENTORY>                                        446
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,343
<PP&E>                                          15,795
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,201
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,058
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,921
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,321
<SALES>                                        118,639
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,639
<CGS>                                           19,475
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,124
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (112)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,486)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,916
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,197
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $2.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $2.13
        

</TABLE>
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 39572

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

JOSEPH MICHAEL HOLLADAY ,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2012 Unpublished Opinion No. 647

Filed: September 27, 2012

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS I S AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fif th Judicial District, State of Idaho, Minidoka County. Hon. Jonathan P. Brody , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of one year , for sexual battery of a min or child

, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Shawn F. Wilkerson , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Joseph Michael Holladay pled guilty to sexual battery of a minor child . Idaho Code § 18

-
1508A . The district court sentenced Holladay to a unified term of ten years, with a minimum

period of confinement of one year

. Holladay appeals asserting the district court abused its

discretion by imposing an excessive sentence

. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 1 14, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing2 the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Holla day ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
# C_2021009EN.01003101.xml

| 11.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/31

---

Action brought on 6 November 2020 — Kerstens v Commission

(Case T-672/20)

(2021/C 9/44)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Petrus Kerstens (La Forclaz, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the European Commission’s decision dated 20 January 2020 rejecting Mr Petrus Kerstens’ request for assistance D/517/19 of 17 September 2019 brought under Articles 24 and 12a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the European Commission’s decision dated 20 January 2020 rejecting Mr Petrus Kerstens’ request for assistance D/517/19 of 17 September 2019 brought under Articles 24 and 12a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;

| — | annul the European Commission’s decision dated 31 January 2020 rejecting Mr Petrus Kerstens’ request for assistance D/516/19 of 17 September 2019 brought under Articles 24 and 12a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the European Commission’s decision dated 31 January 2020 rejecting Mr Petrus Kerstens’ request for assistance D/516/19 of 17 September 2019 brought under Articles 24 and 12a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, by applying Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, by applying Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of good administration and infringement of the rights of the defence, and in particular the right to be heard arising from Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in that the applicant was not heard by the Commission prior to the decisions rejecting his requests for assistance.

---