alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 568 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 243
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 568

                          [Report No. 103-839]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (S. 21) to designate certain lands in the California Desert as 
wilderness, to establish Death Valley, Joshua Tree, and Mojave National 
                     Parks, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 1994

  Mr. Beilenson, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (S. 21) to designate certain lands in the California Desert as 
wilderness, to establish Death Valley, Joshua Tree, and Mojave National 
                     Parks, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this resolution the 
House shall consider the conference report to accompany the bill (S. 
21) to designate certain lands in the California Desert as wilderness, 
to establish Death Valley, Joshua Tree, and Mojave National Parks, and 
for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report 
and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall 
be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the conference report to final adoption without intervening 
motion except one motion to recommit.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 243

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 568

                          [Report No. 103-839]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (S. 21) to designate certain lands in the California Desert as 
wilderness, to establish Death Valley, Joshua Tree, and Mojave National 
                     Parks, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 5, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
H. Res. 483

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

July 26, 1994.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 3870) to promote the research and development of environmental technologies. The first reading of the

bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under

the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an

original bill for the purpose of amendment under the fiveminute rule an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of H.R. 4799. The amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered by title rather than

by section. Each title shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Com-
2

HRES 476 EH

mittee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such

amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may

demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the

amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order as

original text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Delia PEREZ, Individually and as Guardian of Nicholas E. Perez, Incompetent, Petitioner, v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 44084.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 30, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 5, 1974.

Certiorari denied. 277 So.2d 825.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, ADKINS and McCAIN, JJ., dissent.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Whitemark Homes, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


      Date: November 17, 2004

                                           /s/ Kenneth White
                                           Kenneth White
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                           /s/ Russ Christensen
                                           Russ Christensen
                                           Principal Accounting Officer



      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Whitemark Homes,
Inc. and will be retained by Whitemark Homes, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Jean CHRISTINA, Appellant, v. Elmer H. JONES, Appellee.

No. 67-121.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 7, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6997

JOSEPH HATCHER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. WILLIAM YORK, M.D. , Defendant

- Appellee , and HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department Corrections , Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. ( 1:22

- cv - 00047

- CMH

- IDD )

Submitted : April 25, 2023 Decided: April 27, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER , Circuit Judge , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6997 Doc: 18 Filed: 04/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 32 Joseph Hatcher , Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Salvatore Cottone , BYRNE CANAAN LAW , Richmond, Virginia, f or Appellee

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6997 Doc: 18 Filed: 04/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM: Joseph Hatcher appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Dr.
William York in Hatcher’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifferenc e to
Hatcher’s serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment , and the magistrate judge’s order denying Hatcher’s motion to appoint counsel

. On appeal, we confine our
review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hatcher ’ s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s summary judgment disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“ The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”)

. With respect to the magistrate judge’s denial of Hatcher’s motion to appoint counsel, w e have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Hatcher v. Clarke , No.
1:22

- cv - 00047

- CMH

- IDD (E.D. Va. Jan. 13, 2022; July 28, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before t his court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6997 Doc: 18 Filed: 04/27/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 5D 2 0 23

- 2292 LT Case No. 2023

- CF

- 4189

_____________________________
R ICHARD L EE B RENNER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Jonathan D. Sacks , Judge

. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Kathryn Rollison Radtke
, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Damaris E. Reynolds
, Assistant Attorney General, Tal lahassee , for Appellee.

July 30, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.

H ARRIS , K ILBANE and M AC I VER , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

I, Frank A. Lodzinski, certify that:

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GeoResources, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank A. Lodzinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Frank A. LodzinskiFrank A. Lodzinski Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2007
1

Building Equity into Performance Audits

(4 hours)

Overview

The 2021 Technical Revision to the 2018 Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards 

(Yellow Book) introduced “equity” as a concept for auditors to consider when conducting 

audits. This is an important concept given societal changes and increased knowledge about and 

program accountability for diversity and inclusion-related issues. However, auditors need 

support for interpreting the Yellow Book requirements and identifying implications for planning

and conducting their audits, interpreting results, and appropriately communicating audit 

findings. Through a combination of instructor presentations and interactive class exercises, this 

course seeks to help auditors better understand what equity means in the auditing context and 

what strategies they might use to build equity into their performance audits.

Who Should Attend

This course is designed to help auditors understand the 2021 Yellow Book technical revision 

that added equity as a concept for auditors to review in their work. As a result, both new and 

seasoned auditors will benefit from the material.

CPEs: 4

Course Objectives

At the end of this course, participants should be able to understand

• How equity is defined in the audit setting

• Where equity issues might come from

• How to formulate audit questions to address equity

• How to think through potential sources of criteria and data to assess equity and potential 

analysis approaches

• How to appropriately report results

Course Topics

Introduction and Overview

• Discussion of equity vs. equality

• Equality as an audit objective per the 2021 Yellow Book technical revision

• Sources of equity-related audit questions

• Role of critical thinking and team self-assessment 
2

Planning an Equity-Related Audit

• Review of key audit planning steps

• Planning considerations for equity-related audits 

o Criteria

o Condition and potential tools that may help

o Cause and potential tools that may help

o Effect

Collecting and Analyzing Evidence and Reporting Results for an Equity-Related Audit

• Review of typical data collection methodologies

• Data collection considerations for equity-related audits

• Data analysis considerations for equity-related audits

o Qualitative data

o Quantitative data

o Challenges and potential solutions for equity-related audits

• Reporting audit findings related to equity
#### Richard DENNIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-385.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 12, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 15


May 3, 2000


To Mirage Resorts, Incorporated

We  are  aware  that Mirage Resorts, Incorporated has  incorporated  by
reference  in  its Registration Statements on Form S-8  (File  No.  33-
16037),  on  Form S-8 (File No. 33-48394), on Form S-8  (File  No.  33-
63804), on Form S-8 (File No. 33-60183) and on Form S-8 (File No.  333-
59455)  its  Form  10-Q  for the quarter ended  March  31,  2000  which
includes our report dated April 24, 2000 covering the unaudited interim
financial information contained therein.  Pursuant to Regulation  C  of
the  Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered  a  part  of
these registration statements or a report prepared or certified by  our
firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

Very truly yours,



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 325 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 325

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 25, 1994.
    Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the Speaker on the 
part of the House of Representatives to join with a committee on the part of the 
Senate to notify the President of the United States that a quorum of each House 
has assembled and Congress is ready to receive any communication that he may be 
pleased to make.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8177 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8177

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove from the list 
 of drugs excluded from coverage under the Medicare prescription drug 
 program prescription oral vitamins and mineral products indicated for 
  the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in individuals with chronic 
                            kidney disease.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 4, 2020

  Mr. O'Halleran (for himself, Mr. Bucshon, Mr. Butterfield, and Mr. 
   Mullin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove from the list 
 of drugs excluded from coverage under the Medicare prescription drug 
 program prescription oral vitamins and mineral products indicated for 
  the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in individuals with chronic 
                            kidney disease.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Renal Anemia Innovation Support and 
Expansion Act'' or the ``RAISE Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVING CERTAIN PRESCRIPTION VITAMINS AND MINERAL PRODUCTS 
              FROM THE LIST OF DRUGS EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE UNDER THE 
              MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG PROGRAM.

    Section 1860D-2(e)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395w-102(e)(2)(A)) is amended by inserting ``other than subparagraph 
(F) of such section (relating to prescription vitamin and mineral 
products, except prenatal vitamins and fluoride preparations) if the 
prescription vitamin or mineral product is orally administered and is 
indicated for treatment of iron deficiency anemia in individuals with 
chronic kidney disease,'' after ``other than subparagraph (E) of such 
section (relating to smoking cessation agents),''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Lois L. MORRIS, Appellant, v. Perry MORRIS, Appellee.

No. 68-564.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

May 5, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 131 (Monday, July 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31758-31759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14641]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 30, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice

[[Page 31759]]

President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. American Heartland Bancshares, Inc., Sugar Grove, Illinois; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Community Holdings 
Corporation and thereby indirectly acquire First Secure Bank and Trust 
Company, both of Palos Hills, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 3, 2018.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-14641 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                   BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



                                                  For the Year Ended December 31
                                                  ------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               1996            1995            1994
                                          --------------  --------------  --------------
<S>                                       <C>             <C>             <C>
                                          (in thousands, except share information)
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE
Shares of Common Stock:
 Weighted average shares outstanding ...      62,444,170      61,660,100      61,387,500
                                          ==============  ==============  ==============

Net income .............................    $     55,349    $     43,179    $     26,465
                                          ==============  ==============  ==============

Primary earnings per share
(pro forma 1995 and 1994) (1) ..........    $        .89    $       $.70    $        .43
                                          ==============  ==============  ==============


FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Shares of Common Stock:
 Weighted average shares outstanding ...      62,444,170      61,660,100      61,387,500
 Dilutive effect of options ............         236,517          47,730               -
 Dilutive effect of contingent shares ..         475,828         139,340               -
Fully Diluted Weighted Average
Shares Outstanding .....................      63,156,515      61,847,170      61,387,500
                                          ==============  ==============  ==============

Net income .............................    $     55,349    $     43,179    $     26,465
                                          ==============  ==============  ==============

Fully diluted earnings per share
(pro forma 1995 and 1994) (1) and (2) ..    $        .88    $        .70    $        .43
                                          ==============  ==============  ==============
</TABLE>




(1) Information concerning pro forma earnings per share is included in Note 2,
    "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," of the Notes to Financial
    Statements in the Company's 1996 Annual Report and is incorporated herein by
    reference.
        

(2) Fully diluted earnings per share for all years presented are not disclosed
    in the financial statements because the amounts are not considered dilutive
    under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 15,
    "Earnings Per Share."