alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,825
<OTHER-SE>                                    (110,499)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,674
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               153,235
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                771,281
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   618,046
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Reinstated and Dismissed and Memorandum

Opinion filed March 2 8 , 2024
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 23

- 00159

- CV

PAUL TRCKA , Appellant

V. GULF STREAM CONSTRUCTION, LLC , Appellee
On Appeal from the 400th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20

- DCV

- 271523

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a December 1, 202 2 final order dismissing the underlying case for want of prosecution

. The notice of appeal was filed on March 7 , 2023. The trial court found that appellant received notice of the final order on December 9, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.2(c). On February 26, 2024, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss th is appeal based on a settlement that makes this appeal moot

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. We dismiss the appeal the want of jurisdiction

. PER CURIAM
Panel c onsists of Justice s Wise, Spain, and Hassan.
# C_2020114EN.01001601.xml

| 6.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/16

---

Action brought on 13 February 2020 — Qx World v EUIPO — Mandelay (SCIO)

(Case T-86/20)

(2020/C 114/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Qx World Kft. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: Á. László and A. Cserny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mandelay Kft. (Szigetszentmiklós, Hungary)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark SCIO — European Union trade mark No 11 191 194

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2019 in Case R 1312/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the contested decision in a way to annul the first instance decision and remit the case to EUIPO’s Cancellation Division for further prosecution; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision in a way to annul the first instance decision and remit the case to EUIPO’s Cancellation Division for further prosecution;

| — | as an alternative, annul both the contested decision and the first instance decision and remit the case to EUIPO’s Cancellation Division for further prosecution. |
| --- | --- |

—

as an alternative, annul both the contested decision and the first instance decision and remit the case to EUIPO’s Cancellation Division for further prosecution.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of essential procedural requirements. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of essential procedural requirements.

---
257 La. 859

#### Murriell CUMMINGS v. PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 51159.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1971.

In re: Murriell Cummings applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 242 So.2d 8.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.
#### Bevens et *al.*vs. Baxter.

The 19th section, chapter 154, Gould's Digest, Acta of 1854, page 109, Acte of 1852, page 42, are public acts in their character and subject matter, though local in their application, aud the courts are bound to take judicial notice of them.

*388
      *Appeal from Independence Circuit Court.*

Hon. Wn. R. Cain Circuit Judge.

Bevens, for the appellant.

Mr. Chief Justice English

delivered the opinion of the court!

This suit was brought by Baxter as school commissioner of section 16, township 13 north, range 6 west, on a bond executed to McGuire, his predecessor in the same office.

A demurrer was interposed to the declaration on the ground that the special acts under which the plaintiff held the office of school commissioner for the section and township recited in the bond, and in the declaration, were private statutes, of which the court could not take judicial notice, and should have been set out in the declaration. The demurrer was overruled,' and final judgment for plaintiff.

For the acts in question, see *Gould’s Digest, chap.*154, *sec.*79; *Acts of*1854, *p.*109; *Acts of*1852, *p.*42, and acts there referred to.

The acts are not private statutes as supposed by appellants. They are local in their application, relating, as they do, to the sixteenth section and common schools of a particular township, but they are, nevertheless, public acts in their character and subject matter, and the courts are bound to take judicial notice of them. *McCuen vs. State (No.*1), 19 *Ark.*630.

Judgment affirmed.
#### Glenda Louise CARTER, Appellant, v. Larry J. CARTER, Appellee.

No. M-462.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 18, 1970.

Albert S. C. Millar, Jr., Jacksonville, for appellant.

R. Hudson Olliff, Jacksonville, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has taken this interlocutory appeal seeking to reverse the lower court’s order denying appellant’s motion to modify *462the final judgment in this cause. The said final judgment awarded custody of the child to the appellee. No appeal of that order was taken.

In the order denying modification of the final judgment, the trial court found from the evidence that the best interests and welfare of the child require that she remain in the custody of appellee. Our consideration of the record, briefs, and argument of counsel leads us to the view that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the interlocutory order appealed herein. The trial court’s express finding in the order appealed that the best interests and welfare of the child require that her custody remain with the appellee causes the issues herein to be controlled by the principles enunciated by this court in Ritsi v. Ritsi, 160 So.2d 159 (Fla.App.1964).

Accordingly, the interlocutory order reviewed herein is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             771
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,338
<ALLOWANCES>                                       372
<INVENTORY>                                        824
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,082
<PP&E>                                          58,683
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,262
<BONDS>                                         14,886
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,159
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,431
<SALES>                                         18,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,642
<CGS>                                            7,786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    54
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,022
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,708
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,071
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,637
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    320
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Georgia COLHOUN, Appellant, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., a corporation, and Edward Castle, Appellees.

No. 70-930.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 6, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 15


August 4, 1999


To Mirage Resorts, Incorporated

We  are  aware  that  Mirage Resorts, Incorporated has  incorporated  by
reference   in   its   Registration  Statements  on  Form S-8 (File  No.
33-16037),  on  Form  S-8 (File No. 33-48394),  on  Form  S-8 (File  No.
33-63804),  on  Form  S-8  (File  No. 33-60183),  on Form S-8 (File  No.
333-59455),  on  Form S-3 (File No. 333-39029) and on Form S-3 (File No.
333-77973)  its  Form  10-Q  for  the  quarter ended June 30, 1999 which
includes our  report dated August 4, 1999 covering the unaudited interim
financial  information  contained therein.  Pursuant to Regulation C  of
the  Securities  Act  of  1933,  that report is not considered a part of
these  registration  statements  or  a  report  prepared or certified by
our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

Very truly yours,



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
# Official Journal L 47/20 F

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 47 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6120 February 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 47

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6120 February 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2018/229 of 12 February 2018 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise and repealing Commission Decision 2013/480/EU (notified under document C(2018) 696)
   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2018/229 of 12 February 2018 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise and repealing Commission Decision 2013/480/EU (notified under document C(2018) 696)
   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2018) 696)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN 0648-XG322

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice; public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Advisory Panel and River Herring and Shad Advisory Panel of the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) will hold a joint meeting.

# DATES:

                        The meeting will be held on Tuesday, July 17, 2018, from 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. For agenda details, see                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                        .                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held via webinar with a telephone-only audio connection to participate:                         *http://mafmc.adobeconnect.com/​msb-rh-s/​.*                         Telephone instructions are provided upon connecting, or the public can call direct: (800) 832-0736, Rm: *7833942#.                    

*Council address:*                         Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331 or on their website at                         *www.mafmc.org.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 526-5255.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the meeting is to provide input on the pending framework action that addresses mackerel rebuilding, mackerel specifications, and the river herring and shad cap for the mackerel fishery.

## Special Accommodations

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should be directed to M. Jan Saunders, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior to any meeting date.

Dated: June 27, 2018.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2018-14137 Filed 6-29-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
----

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices

(2005/C 153/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)

NOTE:

More information about harmonised standards on the Internet at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/standardization/harmstds/

----

(1)  ESO: European Standardisation Organisation:

(2)OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37.

(3)OJ L 217, 5.8.1998, p. 18.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 319 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 319

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 21, 1993.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 3) to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide for 
a voluntary system of spending limits and benefits for congressional election 
campaigns, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be 
dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and the amendments 
made in order by this resolution and shall not exceed one hour equally divided 
and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
House Administration. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 
amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an 
original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on House 
Administration now printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in 
part 1 of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. The 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute, as modified, shall be 
considered as read. No amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute, as modified, shall be in order except the amendment printed in part 
2 of the report of the Committee on Rules, which may be offered only by a Member 
designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 
the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent 
and an opponent, and shall not be subject to amendment. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendment as may have been adopted. Any Member may 
demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 
the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a substitute made in 
order as original text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit, which may not include instructions. After passage 
of H.R. 3, it shall be in order to take from the Speaker's table the bill S. 3 
and to consider the Senate bill in the House. It shall be in order to move to 
strike all after the enacting clause of the Senate bill and to insert in lieu 
thereof the provisions of H.R. 3 as passed by the House. If the motion is 
adopted and the Senate bill, as amended, is passed, then it shall be in order to 
move that the House insist on its amendments to S. 3 and request a conference 
with the Senate thereon.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
258 La. 920

#### LOUISIANA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY v. CHURCHILL FARMS, INC.

No. 51471.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 11, 1971.

In re: Churchill Farms, Inc. applying for writs of review, certiorari, and prohibition.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction.
#### Joe Artis COUNCIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-244.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

May 9, 1969.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; Edward J. Hanlon, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           14205
<SECURITIES>                                     16740
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 27376
<PP&E>                                           37359
<DEPRECIATION>                                     746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   73936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             6122
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        102189
<OTHER-SE>                                     (35342)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     73936
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1405
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1164)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1164)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1164)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
|   | a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                   |         /s/ Michael R. Elia                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael R. Elia Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |