alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 507

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

August 5, 1994.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4217) to reform the Federal crop insurance

program, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined

to the bill and the amendments made in order by this resolution and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on Agriculture. After general debate the bill shall

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It

shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Agriculture now printed in the bill, modified by the

amendments printed in part 1 of the report of the Committee
2

HRES 507 EH

on Rules accompanying this resolution. The committee

amendment in the nature of a substitute, as modified, shall

be considered as read. All points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute, as modified, are

waived. Before consideration of any other amendment it shall

be in order to consider the amendments printed in part 2 of

the report of the Committee on Rules. Each amendment

printed in part 2 of the report may be offered only by a

Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read,

shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally

divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent,

and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All

points of order against the amendments printed in part 2 of

the report are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the

nature of a substitute, as modified. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments
3

HRES 507 EH

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except

one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Willard Timothy MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-796.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 21, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
"THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IT QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS."
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                               5
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,366
<ALLOWANCES>                                        24
<INVENTORY>                                      1,337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,800
<PP&E>                                          14,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,368
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,716
<BONDS>                                          4,112
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,805
<SALES>                                          3,405
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,405
<CGS>                                            2,531
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    244
<INCOME-TAX>                                        99
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                145
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       145
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Georgia-Pacific Group EPS - Primary 1.15
The Timber Company EPS - Primary 0.53
<F2>Georgia-Pacific Group EPS - Diluted 1.13
The Timber Company EPS - Diluted 0.53
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
No. 11035.

#### The Cincinnati Traction Company *v.*Rieck.

Decided October 20, 1908.

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Messrs. Kinkead, Rogers & Ellis,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Strieker & Johnson,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur. Price, C. J., not participating.
Exhibit 32

                   Certification Accompanying Periodic Report
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                              (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350)

The undersigned, Eric Claus, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Great
Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. ("Company"), and Brenda M. Galgano, Senior
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies
that (1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 14, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
the results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  July 21, 2008                 /s/ Eric Claus
                                      --------------
                                      Eric Claus
                                      President
                                      and
                                      Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  July 21, 2008                 /s/ Brenda M. Galgano
                                      ---------------------
                                      Brenda M. Galgano
                                      Senior Vice President,
                                      Chief Financial Officer



                                       62
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 526 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 526







                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       August 21, 1994.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider a further conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3355) to amend 
the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to allow grants to 
increase police presence, to expand and improve cooperative efforts between law 
enforcement agencies and members of the community to address crime and disorder 
problems, and otherwise to enhance public safety. All points of order against 
the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference 
report shall be considered as read. The conference report shall be debatable for 
eighty minutes, with twenty minutes controlled by the chairman of the Committee 
on the Judiciary, forty minutes controlled by the ranking minority member of the 
Committee on the Judiciary, and twenty minutes controlled by Representative 
Castle of Delaware. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
conference report to final adoption without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit, which may contain instructions only if offered by Representative 
Michel of Illinois or his designee.
            Attest:






                                                                          Clerk.`
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                          UT
<CIK> 0000077227
<NAME> PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                                 US DOLLARS


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                 PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   1,213,192
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                   364,365
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        192,794
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    1,933,377
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,703,728
<COMMON>                                      105,812
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                     285,486
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            51,459  <F1>
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                442,757
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         100,000  <F2>
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          424,687
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             21,200
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                100,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      13
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     2,037
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   11
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              2,613,023
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               3,703,728
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     220,105
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                0
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    166,473
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    166,473
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        53,632
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                847
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 54,479
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        9,108  <F3>
<NET-INCOME>                                   26,942  <F4>
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  26,942
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       45,000  <F5>
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      28,437
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        (44,426)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<FN>

<F1> INCLUDES ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME OF $10,252.
<F2> REPRESENTS TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $100,000.
<F3> INCLUDES AMOUNT FOR TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $1,835.
<F4> AMOUNT IS NET OF INCOME TAX EXPENSE OF $18,429.
<F5> REPRESENTS COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS PAID TO PARENT CORPORATION.
</FN>


</TABLE>
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2170/2004

of 17 December 2004         

apportioning, for the 2004/05 marketing year, 5 000 tonnes of short flax fibre and hemp fibre as national guaranteed quantities between Denmark, Greece, Ireland, Italy and Luxembourg

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000 of 27 July 2000 on the common organisation of the markets in flax and hemp grown for fibre (1), and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 2004/05 marketing year, the apportionment in national guaranteed quantities provided for in Article 3(2)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000 shall be as follows:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 16 November 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 December 2004.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 393/2004 (OJ L 65, 3.3.2004, p. 4).

(2)OJ L 35, 6.2.2001, p. 18. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1401/2003 (OJ L 199, 7.8.2003, p. 3).

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 2 3, 2019 

# Order

Clerk October 2 3, 2019

1 5 9744

- 5 ( 5 9 )

MICHAEL J. LONG, Personal Representative

of the ESTATE OF MICHAEL KNUDSEN

, Plaintiff/Counter

- Defendant

- Appellee

, SC: 1 59744

v COA: 34 1412

Grand Traverse CC:

2016

- 031437

- NM

GEOFFREY FIEGER and FIEGER LAW

, PC,

Defendants/Counter

- Plaintiffs/Third

- Party

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

and

RICHARD M GOODMAN, GOODMAN

KALAHAR, DEAN A ROBB, and DEAN ROBB

LAW FIRM,

Third

- Party Defendants

- Appellees

.

_______ ________________________________ ___ /

ZACHARY ALLEN KOTT

- MILLARD

, Plaintiff/Counter

- Defendant

- Appellee,

SC: 1 59745

v COA: 34141 4

Grand Traverse CC:

2016

- 031442

- NM

GEOFFREY FIEGER and FIEGER LAW, PC,

Defendants/Counter

- Plaintiffs/Third

- Party

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

and

RICHARD M GOODMAN, GOODMAN

KALAHAR, DEAN A ROBB, and DEAN ROBB

LAW FIRM,

Third

- Party Defendants

- Appellees

.

_______________________________________ ___ /

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of appellant s to extend the time for filing

their reply is GRANTED

. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or

be fore Novem ber 7 , 2019.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

# SUBSIDIARIES OFREGISTRANT

 
| 1.     |   | XImage Corporation, a California corporation                                                               |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 2.     |   | ImageWare Systems ID Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly  Imaging Technology Corporation)        |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 3.     |   | I.W. Systems Canada Company, a Nova Scotia unlimited liability  company                                    |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 4.     |   | ImageWare Digital Photography Systems, LLC, a Nevada limited  liability company (formerly Castleworks LLC) |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 5.     |   | E-Focus West LLC, a Nevada limited liability company                                                       |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 6.     |   | G&A Imaging, Inc., a Nevada corporation                                                                |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 7.     |   | Digital Imaging International GmbH, a company formed under German  laws                                    |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 8.     |   | Digital Imaging Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., a company formed under  Singapore laws                             |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      19,157,000              19,157,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,413,000              17,413,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,261,000              34,261,000
<PP&E>                                   1,407,575,000           1,407,575,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              42,969,000              42,969,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,429,488,000           1,429,488,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,632,000              27,632,000
<BONDS>                                    555,876,000             555,876,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 845,980,000             845,980,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,429,488,000           1,429,488,000
<SALES>                                     46,511,000             125,987,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,224,000             132,302,000
<CGS>                                       12,564,000              33,657,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,113,000              54,762,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,849,000               5,636,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,260,000              25,230,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,002,000              46,674,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,002,000              46,674,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0               2,432,000
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,002,000              44,242,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38                    1.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38                    1.47



</TABLE>
# C_2023063EN.01000601.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Romania) — TJ v Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări

(Case C-392/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Directive 90/270/EEC - Article 9(3) - Work with display screen equipment - Protection of workers’ eyes and eyesight - Special corrective appliances - Spectacles - Acquisition by the employee - Arrangements for the employer to meet the costs)

(2023/C 63/07)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: TJ

Respondent: Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 9(3) of Council Directive 90/270/EEC of 29 May 1990 on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment (fifth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 87/391/EEC)
  must be interpreted as meaning that ‘special corrective appliances’ provided for in that provision include spectacles aimed specifically at the correction and prevention of visual difficulties relating to work involving display screen equipment. Moreover, those ‘special corrective appliances’ are not limited to appliances used exclusively for professional purposes. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 9(3) of Council Directive 90/270/EEC of 29 May 1990 on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment (fifth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 87/391/EEC)

must be interpreted as meaning that ‘special corrective appliances’ provided for in that provision include spectacles aimed specifically at the correction and prevention of visual difficulties relating to work involving display screen equipment. Moreover, those ‘special corrective appliances’ are not limited to appliances used exclusively for professional purposes.

| 2. | Article 9(3) and (4) of Directive 90/270
  must be interpreted as meaning that the employer’s obligation, laid down in that provision, to provide the workers concerned with a special corrective appliance, may be met by the direct provision of the appliance to the worker by the employer or by reimbursement of the necessary expenses incurred by the worker, but not by the payment of a general salary supplement to the worker. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 9(3) and (4) of Directive 90/270

must be interpreted as meaning that the employer’s obligation, laid down in that provision, to provide the workers concerned with a special corrective appliance, may be met by the direct provision of the appliance to the worker by the employer or by reimbursement of the necessary expenses incurred by the worker, but not by the payment of a general salary supplement to the worker.

---

(1)  OJ C 391, 27.9.2021.

---