alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTIONS

Appellate case name: In re DM Works, L.L.C., Relator

Appellate case number: 01

- 16

- 00757

- CV

Trial court case number: 2016

- 47447

Trial court: 151st District Court of Harris County

On November 10 , 2016, th is Court’s Order and Notice of Intent to Dismiss for Want of Jurisdiction, among other things, ordered relator to have a motion to substitute and notice of appearance be filed by a licensed attorney within 10 days of that Order, and ordered Gerald Hopkins, relator’s current counsel who was disqualified by the trial court,
file a motion to withdraw w ith this Court within 10 days of any motion to substitute. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6

. 5 ( d ) . This Court’s Order further ordered relator’s new counsel to file a supplemental appendix complying with this Court’s October 13, 2016 Order, within 10 days of that Nov ember 10, 2016 Order, or else this Court may dismiss this mandamus petition for want of prosecution without further notice. See id. 42.3(b), (c).

On November 18, 2016, Gerald Hopkins filed a motion to withdraw as relator’s
counsel in this Court . On Nove mber 21, 2016, new counsel Stephen Cochell filed a notice of appearance on behalf of relator in this Court, noting that Hopkins had recently informed Cochell of his intent to file his motion to withdraw. Accordingly, because Hopkins already filed a motion to withdraw as counsel in this Court, the Court construes Cochell’s notice of appearance to include a motion to substitute, and GRANTS the
motion s to substitute and withdraw

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5(d). Withdrawing counsel Hopkins is ordered to comply with his notification duties and file a copy of that notice with the Clerk of this Court within 10 days of this Order. See id. 6.5(c). The Clerk of
this Court is directed to remove Gerald Hopkins as counsel for relator and to substitute Stephe n Cochell as lead counsel for relator.Also on November 21, 2016, on behalf of relator, Stephen Cochell filed a motion

for a temporary stay of this Court’s disposition of any pending motions for a period of ten days to allow Cochell time to evaluate the ma tter and confer with his client regarding the need for proceeding with this mandamus petition. On November 22, 2016, counsel for real party in interest, Dimensional Machine Works, L.L.C. (“RPI Dimensional”), filed a response in opposition to relator’s mot ion for temporary stay contending, among other things, that a stay is unnecessary because there are no pending motions before this Court.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the relator’s motion to stay, construed as a stay of this Court’s disposition of RPI Di mensional’s motion to dismiss, filed in this Court on November 7, 2016, which remains pending, and of relator’s requirement to file a supplemental appendix

, for ten days from the date of this Order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: / s/ Laura Carter Higley

 Acting individually

Date: N ovember 29, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 381 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 381

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a three-
fifths majority vote to pass any bill, joint resolution, amendment, or 
                  conference report raising revenues.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 1994

Mr. Hefley (for himself, Mr. Bachus of Alabama, Mr. Bunning, Mr. Burton 
 of Indiana, Mr. Canady, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Emerson, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. 
     Gingrich, Mr. Hansen, Ms. Dunn, Mr. King, Mr. Lightfoot, Mr. 
Livingston, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Myers of Indiana, Mr. Portman, Mr. Ramstad, 
Mr. Stump, Mr. Sundquist, Mr. Torkildsen, and Mr. Linder) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a three-
fifths majority vote to pass any bill, joint resolution, amendment, or 
                  conference report raising revenues.

    Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
    ``8. Any bill, joint resolution, amendment, or conference report 
that raises revenues may be approved in the House only by an 
affirmative vote of at least three-fifths of the Members voting, a 
quorum being present.''.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32-1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Goldfield Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John H. Sottile, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Goldfield Corporation and will be retained by The Goldfield Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: November 14, 2006

|   | /s/ John H.   Sottile                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |                                         |
|   | John H.   Sottile                       |
|   | Chairman of   the Board of Directors,   |
|   | President   and Chief Executive Officer |
# C_2023155EN.01000701.xml

| 2.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2023 — PlasticsEurope v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Federal Republic of Germany, French Republic, ClientEarth

(Case C-119/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Establishment of a list of substances subject to authorisation - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Annex XIV - List of substances identified for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV - Updating of the entry of the substance bisphenol A as ‘a substance of very high concern’)

(2023/C 155/09)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: PlasticsEurope (represented by: R. Cana and E. Mullier, avocates)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: W. Broere and A. Hautamäki, acting as Agents, and by S. Raes, advocaat), Federal Republic of Germany (represented initially by J. Möller and D. Klebs, acting as Agents, and subsequently by J. Möller, acting as Agent), French Republic (represented by: G. Bain and T. Stéhelin, acting as Agents), ClientEarth (represented by: P. Kirch, lawyer)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders PlasticsEurope AISBL to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and ClientEarth; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders PlasticsEurope AISBL to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and ClientEarth;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 163, 3.5.2021.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 461 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 461

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 23, 1994.
    Resolved, That points of order against consideration of the bill (H.R. 4603) 
making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the 
Judiciary, and related agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 1995, and making supplemental appropriations for these departments and 
agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes, 
for failure to comply with clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI or clause 7 of rule XXI are 
waived. During consideration of the bill, all points of order against provisions 
in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived except as 
follows: beginning with ``notwithstanding'' on page 3, line 18, through ``Act,'' 
on line 19; beginning with ``That'' on page 36, line 16, through ``Provided 
further,'' on page 37, line 6; and beginning with ``: Provided'' on page 48, 
line 25, through ``Treasury'' on page 49, line 4. Where points of order are 
waived against only part of a paragraph, any point of order against matter in 
the balance of the paragraph may be applied only within the balance of the 
paragraph and not against the entire paragraph. The amendment printed in the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall have 
precedence over a motion that the Committee of the Whole rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted, if the 
amendment is offered by a Member designated in the report.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on June 11, 2018, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute—Cooperative Research Group on HEDGE IV (“HEDGE IV”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Herndon, VA, has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and HEDGE IV intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On February 14, 2017, HEDGE IV filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 27, 2017 (82 FR 15238).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 30, 2018. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 5, 2018 (83 FR 26092).                

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2018-14585 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                             GTE SOUTH INCORPORATED
              Statement of the Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                  (Unaudited)


(Dollars in Millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                             Nine Months Ended
                                                                             September 30, 1998
                                                                             ------------------
<S>                                                                          <C>        
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income before extraordinary charge                                         $            206.6
  Add - Income taxes                                                                      131.0
      - Fixed charges                                                                      55.8
                                                                             ------------------
Adjusted earnings                                                            $            393.4
                                                                             ------------------
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                                           $             50.6
  Portion of rent expense
      representing interest                                                                 5.2
                                                                             ------------------
Adjusted fixed charges                                                       $             55.8
                                                                             ------------------
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                                         7.05
</TABLE>
#### Willie Davis JUSTICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-442.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 24, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

I, C. Wayne Alderman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-5(e) and 15d-5(e) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

d) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

e) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

c) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

d) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2007



|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/ C. Wayne Alderman           
|Director of Financial Operations
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.6

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas J. McDonald, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of SkillSoft Public Limited
Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Omitted;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [Not applicable]

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  April 14, 2005

                                        /s/ Thomas J. McDonald
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Thomas J. McDonald
                                        Chief Financial Officer
# C_2021053EN.01006101.xml

| 15.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/61

---

Action brought on 21 December 2020 — Nissan Motor v EUIPO — VDL Groep (VDL E-POWER)

(Case T-755/20)

(2021/C 53/77)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nissan Motor Co. Ltd (Yokohama-shi, Japan) (represented by: P. Martini-Berthon, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: VDL Groep BV (Eindhoven, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark VDL E-POWER — Application for registration No 17 895 702

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 October 2020 in Case R 2914/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | allow the present applicant for annulment; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the present applicant for annulment;

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and, as the case may be, the intervener to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and, as the case may be, the intervener to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---