alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023083EN.01000501.xml

| 6.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/5

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — Pesticide Action Network Europe, Nature and Progrès Belgique ASBL, TN v État belge

(Case C-162/21, (1) Pesticide Action Network Europe and Others)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Environment - Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 - Placing of plant protection products on the market - Article 53(1) - Emergency situations in plant protection - Derogation - Scope - Seeds treated with plant protection products - Neonicotinoids - Active substances posing high risks to bees - Prohibition of the placing on the market and outside use of seeds treated with plant protection products containing those active substances - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/784 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/785 - Non-applicability of the derogation - Protection of human and animal health and the environment - Precautionary principle)

(2023/C 83/05)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Pesticide Action Network Europe, Nature et Progrès Belgique ASBL, TN

Defendant: État belge

Intervening parties: Sesvanderhave SA, Confédération des Betteraviers Belges ASBL, Société Générale des Fabricants de Sucre de Belgique ASBL (Subel), Isera & Scaldis Sugar SA (Iscal Sugar), Raffinerie Tirlemontoise SA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC

must be interpreted as not permitting a Member State to authorise the placing on the market of plant protection products for seed treatment, or the placing on the market and use of seeds treated with those products, where the placing on the market and use of seeds treated with those products have been expressly prohibited by an implementing regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 242, 21.6.2021.

---
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14104]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0618]


Agency information Collection Activity: Application by Insured 
Terminally Ill Person for Accelerated Benefits

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice to withdraw.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 22, 2018, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 
erroneously posted a consecutive 30-day Federal Register Notice 
(Application by Insured Terminally Ill Person for Accelerated Benefits) 
Document Number: 2018-13397; OMB control number: 2900-0618.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Harvey-Pryor, Enterprise 
Records Service (005R1B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, at 202-461-5870.

Correction

    VA wishes to inform the public that it is withdrawing FR Document 
Number: 2018-13397, 83 FR 29155. This was a duplicate 30-day Public 
Notice published in error. The correct and initial 30-day Notice posted 
May 24, 2018, Volume 83, No. 101, page 24163, FR Document Number: 2018-
11131, which has since concluded.

    Dated: June 26, 2018.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Cynthia D. Harvey-Pryor,
Department Clearance Officer, Office of Quality, Privacy and Risk, 
Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2018-14104 Filed 6-29-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
# C_2020201EN.01003301.xml

| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/33

---

Action brought on 19 March 2020 — BG v Parliament

(Case T-164/20)

(2020/C 201/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: BG (represented by: A. Tymen, L. Levi, and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant’s decision dated 20 May 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance of July 2017; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant’s decision dated 20 May 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance of July 2017;

| — | if needed, annul the defendant’s decision dated 10 December 2019 rejecting the applicant’s complaint dated 20 August 2019; |
| --- | --- |

—

if needed, annul the defendant’s decision dated 10 December 2019 rejecting the applicant’s complaint dated 20 August 2019;

| — | grant compensation of the applicant’s moral harm suffered by the fault of the defendant, evaluated at the sum of 50 000 Euro; |
| --- | --- |

—

grant compensation of the applicant’s moral harm suffered by the fault of the defendant, evaluated at the sum of 50 000 Euro;

| — | reimburse the applicant’s incurred costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

reimburse the applicant’s incurred costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging the violation of the fundamental right to be heard (article 41, paragraph 2, a) of the Charter). |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging the violation of the fundamental right to have his affairs treated impartially and fairly (article 41, paragraph 1, of the Charter) and the violation of article 24 SR and of the duty of care. |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging the violation of the fundamental right to receive a decision that states reasons (article 41, paragraph 2, c) of the Charter and article 25 SR). |
| --- | --- |

3.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging an error of assessment and breach of articles 12a and 24 SR.
  On the request for compensation, the applicant exposes the fault committed by the defendant, the damage she suffered and the link between the fault and the damage. |
| --- | --- |

4.

On the request for compensation, the applicant exposes the fault committed by the defendant, the damage she suffered and the link between the fault and the damage.

---
#### Horace D. DANLEY, Appellant, v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. OF FORT LAUDERDALE, INC., Appellee.

No. 71-169.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 26, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Jose A. Gonzalez, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Hedges, Controller and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2008



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ David A. Hedges                       
|David A. Hedges                           
|VP, Controller and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 505 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 505

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        August 4, 1994.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3841) to amend the 
Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, the Revised Statutes of the United States, and 
the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to provide for interstate banking and 
branching. All points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2021391EN.01000301.xml

| 27.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 391/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 391/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 22 February 2021 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v NB

(Case C-108/21)

(2021/C 391/04)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG

Defendant: NB

Question referred

Does a strike by the air carrier’s own employees that is called by a trade union constitute an extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1)?

The case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the President of the Court of 17 June 2021.

---

(1)  Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

---
# C_2021228EN.01002302.xml

| 14.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) lodged on 26 March 2021 — R. en R. v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit

(Case C-189/21)

(2021/C 228/31)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: R. en R.

Defendant: Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit

Question referred

Must management requirement (SMR) 10, as laid down in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008, (1) which refers to Article 55, first and second sentences, of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC, (2) be interpreted as meaning that that management requirement also covers the situation in which use is made of a plant protection product which is not authorised in the Member State concerned pursuant to that latter regulation?

---

(1)  OJ 2013 L 347, p. 549.

(2)  OJ 2009 L 309, p. 1.

---
# C_2021044EN.01005101.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/51

---

Action brought on 9 December 2020 — Perry Street Software v EUIPO — Toolstream (SCRUFFS)

(Case T-720/20)

(2021/C 44/74)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Perry Street Software, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: M. Hawkins, solicitor and T. Dolde, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Toolstream Ltd (Yeovil, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark SCRUFFS — International registration designating the European Union No 1 171 590

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 September 2020 in Case R 550/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party before the Board of Appeal (assuming it intervenes in the proceedings) to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party before the Board of Appeal (assuming it intervenes in the proceedings) to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Failure to carry out a full examination and distortion of facts and evidence pursuant to Article 72(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Failure to carry out a full examination and distortion of facts and evidence pursuant to Article 72(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
#### Alfred J. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-14.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 7, 1970.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Brown v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 55; Brown v. State, Fla.1970, 237 So.2d 129, Opinion filed June 24, 1970.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT NO. 15











To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Gerber Scientific, Inc.







|Re: | Registration Statements on Form S-8,
|--- | ------------------------------------
|    | File No. 2-93695, No. 33-58668,     
|    | No. 333-26177, No. 333-42879,       
|    | No. 333-81447, No. 333-83463 and    
|    | No. 333-39754                       
|    |                                     
|    | Registration Statement on Form S-3, 
|    | File No. 33-58670                   
|    |                                     

With respect to the subject Registration Statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated
March 14, 2001 related to our review of interim financial information.



Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act, such reports are not considered a part of a Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.











/ s / KPMG LLP





KPMG LLP









Hartford, Connecticut
March 16, 2001
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Mark S. Hauf, certify that:
*1.* I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofMetromedia International Group, Inc.; *2.* Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport; and *3.* Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this quarterly reportfairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report, *4.* The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
*a)* designed such disclosure control and proceduresor caused such disclosure controls and procedure to bedesigned under our supervision to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared; *b)* evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisquarterly report, our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation; and *c)* disclosed in this quarterly report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by this quarterlyreport that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
*5.* The registrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):
*a)* all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlsover financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and *b)* any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.   Date: June 17, 2004   /s/ MARK S. HAUF   Mark S. Hauf *President, Chief Executive Officer and* *Chairman of the Board* *(Principal Executive Officer)*
58
No. 10776.

#### Royer *v.*Shanafelt, Admr.

Decided December 22, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Portage county.

*Mr. I. H. Phelps*and *Mr. A. S. Cole,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. H. Dussel*and *Messrs. Cushing &*Siddall, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Si-iauck, Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John L. Cutter, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Friendly Ice Cream Corporation;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: July 30, 2004 |                                   |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                | /s/  JOHN  L. CUTTER         |
|                | Chief  Executive Officer and President |

 

----