alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 54
          - [WC Docket No. 10-90; Report No. 3095]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Petitions for Reconsideration.

# SUMMARY:

Petitions for Reconsideration (Petitions) have been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding by Patrick R. Halley, on behalf of Mescalero Apache Telecom, Inc. and Martin L. Stern, on behalf of Sacred Wind Communications, Inc.

# DATES:

Oppositions to the Petition must be filed on or before July 23, 2018. Replies to an opposition must be filed on or before August 2, 2018.

# ADDRESSES:

Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Suzanne Yelen, Wireline Competition Bureau, at: (202) 418-7400; email:                         *Suzanne.Yelen@fcc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a summary of the Commission's document, Report No. 3095, released June 25, 2018. The full text of the Petitions is available for viewing and copying at the FCC Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. It also may be accessed online via the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System at:                     *http://apps.fcc.gov/​ecfs/​.*                     The Commission will not send a Congressional Review Act (CRA) submission to Congress or the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the CRA, 5.U.S.C. because no rules are being adopted by the Commission.                

*Subject:*                     Connect America Fund, Report and Order, FCC 18-37, published at 83 FR 18948, May 1, 2018, in WC Docket No. 10-90. This document is being published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e).                     *See also*47 CFR 1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g).                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     2.                

Federal Communications Commission.

Katura Jackson,

Federal Register Liaison Officer, Office of the Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2018-14418 Filed 7-5-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
# WMS Industry Partners

Multiple Award Schedule SIN 517312

For a full list of WMS industry partners, please visit eLibrary.

If you are an industry partner who wants to be added to this list, fill out the Modification Checklist [DOCX - 41 KB].

## Wireless Carrier Services

**IT Customer Support**

Call:  855-482-4348

Hours for live chat and calls:Sun 8 p.m. - Fri 8:30 p.m. CST

Email:  ITCSC@gsa.gov

Other ways to get support >>

Print PageEmail Page

Top

-  IT contract vehicles and purchasing programs-  Overview 
-  Federal credentialing services 
-  Governmentwide Acquisition Contracts 
-  Multiple Award Schedule — IT    -  FASt Lane: Making it easier 
  -  Automated Contact Center Solutions 
  -  CDM Tools 
  -  Cloud and cloud related IT services 
  -  COMSATCOM  
  -  E-Commerce and Subscription Services 
  -  Earth Observation Solutions 
  -  Health IT Services 
  -  Highly Adaptive Cybersecurity Services 
  -  HSPD-12 Product and Service Components 
  -  Identity, Credentialing and Access Management  
  -  IT Professional Services 
  -  IT Training 
  -  Leasing of New Electronic Equipment  
  -  Equipment Maintenance, Repair Services, and Parts 
  -  Wireless Mobility Solutions      -  Order Wireless Mobility Solutions 
    -  WMS Industry Partners 
    -  Federal Mobility Group 
  -  Purchasing of New Electronic Equipment  
  -  PKI Shared Service Providers Program 
  -  Software Licenses  
  -  Software Maintenance Services 
  -  2GIT BPA 
  -  Laptops and Desktops BPA 
  -  SmartBUY BPA 
  -  Buy from MAS Information Technology 
  -  Sell through MAS Information Technology 
-  Telecommunications and network services 
-  CS3 
-  Dashboards and prices paid tools 
-  IT acquisition help 
-  Legacy IT contracts 
-  Information Technology Acquisition University 
-  Information technology category
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 497

Concerning the situation in Rwanda.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 28, 1994

Mr. SAXTON (for himself and Mr. DELLUMS) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

RESOLUTION

Concerning the situation in Rwanda.

Whereas 2,000,000 refugees fled in a mass exodus from the

nation of Rwanda;

Whereas the situation in Rwanda has been characterized as

the greatest refugee crisis in modern times;

Whereas thousands of Rwandan refugees are dying due to

disease and starvation;

Whereas over 1,200 tons of food a day and 1,000,000 gallons

of water are reported to be required to stem death and

sickness among the Rwandan refugees;

Whereas the American people and the United States Government have historically responded to human tragedies

through the delivery of food, medicine, and other life-sustaining supplies; and
2

•HRES 497 IH

Whereas the United States’ ability to transport and deliver

critically-needed humanitarian aid to Rwanda and future

crises is hampered by a declining airlift fleet: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the United States Government should

3 maintain a commitment to mobilize, in concert with the

4 United Nations and the country’s allies, to provide nec5 essary aid to relieve the human suffering resulting from

6 the Rwandan crisis and to take active steps to ensure that

7 the United States possesses the military assets needed to

8 accomplish this vital undertaking.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 172 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 172

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 24, 1993.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1159) to revise, clarify, and improve certain marine safety laws of 
the United States, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall 
be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries. After general 
debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It 
shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment 
under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries now printed in the 
bill. Each section of the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute 
shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 
amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such 
amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in 
the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or 
to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

JOHN LYNCH

PETITION OF: D. WESLEY CORNISH, ESQUIRE :
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: No s . 53 and 54 EM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19 th day of November , 2021, in consideration of the Motion to
Withdraw, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County for that court to determine whether Attorney D. Wesley Cornish should be granted

leave to withdraw.

Court

- appointed counsel’s duty of representation continues through allocatur

review in this Court. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 122 ( instructing that court

- appointed counsel’s
representation continues on direct appeal through allocatur review) . Additionally, counsel
may not unilaterally refuse to continue representation of his or her client. Rather, counsel

must seek leave from a court to withdraw. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 120(B) (providing that an
attorney may not unilaterally withdraw his or her appearance with respect t o a criminal
defendant; rather, a court must determine whether leave to withdraw is warranted). In the event the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County permits Attorney Cornish
to withdraw, the court shall determine whether to appoint new counsel or to permit John
Lynch to proceed pro se

. The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is ORDERED to enter its order regarding this remand within 90 days and to notify this Court promptly of its determination

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          63,235
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,492)
<INVENTORY>                                     55,420
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               196,663
<PP&E>                                         225,431
<DEPRECIATION>                                (37,268)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 760,195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,249
<BONDS>                                        221,435
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    207,000
<COMMON>                                        94,024
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   760,195
<SALES>                                         81,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,348
<CGS>                                           40,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,023)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,508
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,531)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,531)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)


</TABLE>
No. 00-960.

#### Virgin et al. *v.*San Luis Obispo County et al.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



In connection with the Annual Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the Operating Partnership) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Edward J. Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of Highwoods Properties Inc., general partner of the Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ EDWARD J. FRITSCH                                       
|Edward J. Fritsch                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
|February 17, 2006
EXHIBIT NO. 99



Supplemental Segment Information





|In thousands                     | Three Months Ended
July 31,
|-------------------------------- | ---------------------------
|                                 | 2003                       
|Orders Received:                 |                            
|Sign Making & Specialty Graphics | $  73,546                  
|Apparel & Flexible Materials     | 39,321                     
|Ophthalmic Lens Processing       | 17,649                     
|                                 | $130,516                   
|                                 | =======                    
|                                 |                            
|                                 | July 31,2003               
|Backlog:                         |                            
|Sign Making & Specialty Graphics | $      954                 
|Apparel & Flexible Materials     | 27,919                     
|Ophthalmic Lens Processing       | 2,398                      
|                                 | $ 31,271                   
|                                 | =======
#### K. Gordon MURRAY, Appellant, v. Chris ROBINSON, an Individual, d/b/a Captive Productions, Appellee.

No. 77-2067.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 7, 1978.

John Militana of- Militana, Militana & Militana, Miami, for appellant.

Larry Klein and Cone, Owen, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson & McKeown, P. A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*1254DOWNEY, Judge.

Appellant’s brief states: “This is an interlocutory appeal from an Order denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for damages resulting from an alleged breach of an oral agreement for professional services surrounding production, direction and acting of a certain motion picture.” Obviously the cause of action described is one formerly cognizable at law so that an interlocutory appeal is not appropriate to review an order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. We must therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

In passing we note that if we had jurisdiction we would affirm the order appealed from because the record presented by the appellant is totally deficient. Appellant has presented no record and no appendix. We have neither the complaint in question nor the appellant’s motion to dismiss which was denied without comment by the trial court.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CROSS and LETTS, JJ., concur.

1

. We mention this solely because in dismissing the cause for lack of jurisdiction we have to rely solely on appellant’s designation of the nature of the cause of action pleaded.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In connection with the Annual Report of ImageWare Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wayne Wetherell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: April 13, 2012

ImageWare Systems, Inc.



By: /s/ Wayne WetherellWayne WetherellChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2020304EN.01001701.xml

| 14.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/17

---

Action brought on 8 July 2020 — BPCE and Others v SRB

(Case T-448/20)

(2020/C 304/20)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: BPCE (Paris, France) and 44 other applicants (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul decision SRB/ES/2020/24 on the calculation of the 2020 ex-ante contributions to the SRF in so far as it concerns the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul decision SRB/ES/2020/24 on the calculation of the 2020 ex-ante contributions to the SRF in so far as it concerns the applicants;

| — | pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the SRM Regulation, the Implementing Regulation and the Delegated Regulation inapplicable:






  — | Articles 69(1), 69(2), 70(1) and 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the SRM Regulation, the Implementing Regulation and the Delegated Regulation inapplicable:

—

Articles 69(1), 69(2), 70(1) and 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation;

| — | Articles 4(2), 6 and 7 of the Delegated Regulation, and Annex I thereto; |
| --- | --- |

—

Articles 4(2), 6 and 7 of the Delegated Regulation, and Annex I thereto;

| — | Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-444/20, Société générale and Others v SRB.

---
259 La. 758

#### William B. EBERT and William D. Ebert, Jr. v. Anthony B. MACALUSO.

No. 51600.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 28, 1971.

In re: Anthony J. Macaluso applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 248 So.2d 355.

Writ refused. The assignments of error are factual and do not warrant the grant of a writ.
# Official Journal L 313/22 N

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 313 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5122 November 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 313

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5122 November 2008

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1147/2008 of 31 October 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty, as regards Part III.10 of its Annex 1 | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1147/2008 of 31 October 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty, as regards Part III.10 of its Annex 1

1

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

*

Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Cecil McIntosh PEEK, Appellant, v. Margaret Taylor PEEK, Appellee.

No. 70-127.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 30, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, James R. Stewart, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2020068EN.01006301.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/63

---

Action brought on 14 January 2020 – LG Electronics v EUIPO – Staszewski (K7)

(Case T-21/20)

(2020/C 68/71)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea) (represented by: R. Schiffer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Miłosz Staszewski (Wrocław, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark K7 – Application for registration No 14 641 849

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 October 2019 in Case R 401/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---