Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2020
                              Laura Brock, PT, DAB CR5522 (2020)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Laura Brock, PT, DAB CR5522 (2020)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Laura Brock, PT,
	(NPI: 1730644964 / PTAN: K301460)
	Petitioner,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-19-1082Decision No. CR5522January 30, 2020

        
              
    

      DECISION
I sustain the determination of a Medicare contractor, as affirmed on reconsideration, to grant Petitioner, Laura Brock, PT, an effective date of May 3, 2019, for reassignment of her Medicare benefits to a third party, Motion PT.
I. Background
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) moved for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for a decision based on the parties’ written exchanges.  With its motion, CMS filed 21 proposed exhibits that it identified as CMS Ex. 1-CMS Ex. 21.  Petitioner filed a brief opposing the motion but filed no exhibits of her own.  Petitioner filed no objection to my receiving CMS’s exhibits into the record.
I receive CMS’s exhibits into the record and decide this case based on the parties’ exchanges.  It is unnecessary that I decide whether the criteria for summary judgment are met here inasmuch as neither party offered the written direct testimony of a witness. Consequently, there is no need to convene an in-person hearing.
Page 2
II. Issues, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
**A. Issue**
The issue is whether a Medicare contractor, acting on behalf of CMS, appropriately granted Petitioner an effective date of May 3, 2019, for reassignment of benefits.
**B. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law**
I take notice that “reassignment of benefits” is a term of art used by the Medicare program to describe a situation in which a supplier of services assigns to a third party the authority to claim benefits for items or services that he or she has rendered.  The term is not defined explicitly by regulations.  However, regulations define the circumstances under which Medicare allows reassignment of benefits.  Generally, Medicare allows an individual supplier to reassign the right to claim benefits only where the reassignment is to a Medicare-participating entity under an employer-employee relationship or under a contractual arrangement.  42 C.F.R. § 424.80(a)-(b).
Regulations also govern the effective date of participation in Medicare.  Stated simply, the *earliest* effective date that a Medicare contractor or CMS will grant to an applicant for participation is the filing date of an application for participation (or, in this case, reassignment of benefits) that the contractor or CMS accepts and processes to completion.  42 C.F.R. § 424.520(d).  If a contractor or CMS finally rejects an application, the sole choice left to the applicant, if he or she wants to participate, is to file a new application.  There is no right of appeal from a rejection of an application to participate.  42 C.F.R. § 424.525(d)*.*
Petitioner sought to reassign the right to file claims to an entity, Motion PT.  That entity first became enrolled in the Medicare program effective May 3, 2019 with authority to claim retroactively to April 3, 2019, for services provided to beneficiaries.  CMS Exs. 20-21.1
Petitioner first filed an application on March 18, 2019, requesting that her authority to claim reimbursement be reassigned to Motion PT, effective February 1, 2019.  CMS Ex. 1.  On May 2, 2019, the contractor rejected this application on the ground that Petitioner failed to provide evidence to the contractor that she was enrolled as a Medicare supplier.  CMS Ex. 5.  On April 3, 2019, Petitioner filed a second enrollment application with the contractor and a separate application that her authority to claim reimbursement be reassigned to Motion PT.  CMS Exs. 3-4.  The contractor rejected these applications on May 13, 2019, because the contractor had not, at that point, received Motion PT’s enrollment application.  CMS Ex. 7.
Page 3
Petitioner filed another reassignment application on May 3, 2019.  CMS Ex. 6.  The contractor erroneously returned this application to Petitioner.  Petitioner filed additional enrollment and reassignment applications on May 13, 2019.  CMS Exs. 8-9.  The contractor processed these applications and, recognizing that it had erroneously returned the May 3 application, granted Petitioner participation and reassignment of benefits, effective May 3, 2019, with the right to claim retrospectively to April 3, 2019, for services rendered to Medicare beneficiaries.  CMS Ex. 15.  Petitioner unsuccessfully requested reconsideration of this determination and then filed a request for a hearing.
As a matter of law, the *earliest*effective date that the contractor could assign to Petitioner was May 3, 2019, for two reasons.  First, it was not until May 3, 2019, that Petitioner filed an application that the contractor accepted and processed.  Previous applications by Petitioner, which the contractor rejected, serve as no basis for Petitioner to claim participating status and Petitioner has no right to appeal the rejections.
Second, the entity to which Petitioner sought to reassign her right to file benefits claims, Motion PT, was not enrolled in Medicare as a supplier prior to May 3, 2019.  Put simply, Motion PT did not exist as a Medicare-participating entity prior to that date and, consequently, Petitioner could not lawfully assign the right to file benefits claims to it prior to May 3, 2019.
I do not find persuasive Petitioner’s arguments that she should have been assigned an earlier effective date.  First, Petitioner asserts that there is a dispute as to whether the contractor properly rejected the applications that Petitioner filed prior to May 3.  From this argument I infer that Petitioner seeks to appeal those rejections.  However, and as I have explained, Petitioner has no right to appeal the rejections.  In this case I may decide only whether the contractor properly assigned an effective date for reassignment of benefits premised on Petitioner’s May 3, 2019 application.  I find that it did, for the reasons that I have stated.
Second, Petitioner apparently contends that she is entitled to file reimbursement claims for her services independently from her reassignment of those claims to Motion PT.  However, Petitioner has not offered any evidence to establish that she was enrolled independently prior to May 3, 2019, nor has she offered proof that she filed claims based on her allegedly independent status.  Moreover, Petitioner’s assertions, if that’s what she is contending, are outside of the ambit of the case before me.  The *only* issue that I have authority to hear and decide is the effective date of Petitioner’s reassignment of benefits to Motion PT.
Finally, in her hearing request, Petitioner asserted that she and her employer suffered financial hardship because of her inability to claim reimbursement for services that she provided prior to April 3, 2019.  That is an equitable claim, essentially consisting of a
Page 4
challenge to the contractor’s review based on fairness grounds.  I have no authority to consider that argument.  *Willie Goffney Jr., M.D.*, DAB No. 2763 at 8-9 (2017).


          /s/
        Steven T. Kessel

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. Motion PT has not challenged its effective participation date. back to note 1 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back