alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 184 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 184

   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to direct the 
Speaker to allow the televising of special order speeches of Members at 
  a location in the Capitol other than the Hall of the House, and to 
 eliminate the televising of these speeches as part of the proceedings 
                             of the House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 1993

Mr. Taylor of Mississippi (for himself, Mr. Hefner, Mr. Kanjorski, Ms. 
  Slaughter, Mr. Bryant, Mrs. Unsoeld, Mr. Laughlin, Mr. Tanner, Ms. 
     Lambert, Mr. Peterson of Florida, Mr. Clement, Mr. Penny, Mr. 
 Rostenkowski, Mr. Volkmer, Mr. Ford of Michigan, Mr. Murtha, and Mr. 
 Orton) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to direct the 
Speaker to allow the televising of special order speeches of Members at 
  a location in the Capitol other than the Hall of the House, and to 
 eliminate the televising of these speeches as part of the proceedings 
                             of the House.

    Resolved, That (a) rule I of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``13. (a) He shall at a location in the Capitol other than the Hall 
of the House allow the unedited audio and visual broadcasting and 
recording of special order speeches by Members which shall not be part 
of the proceedings of the House.
    ``(b) He shall provide for the scheduling of special order speeches 
by Members under this clause by the majority and minority leaders.
    ``(c) Paragraphs (b)(2), (3), and (4) and paragraph (c) of clause 9 
of this rule shall apply to coverage made available under this 
clause.''.
    (b)(1) The first sentence of clause 9(a) of rule I of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives is amended by inserting ``, except special 
order speeches of Members'' after ``Representatives''.
    (2) The first sentence of clause 9(b)(1) of rule I of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives is amended by inserting ``, except special 
order speeches of Members'' before the period.

                                 <all>
```
#### Barham *v.*White.

(Division A.

Oct. 29, 1934.)

[157 So. 465.

No. 31347.]

*304Herbert Holmes, of Senatobia, and Gerald Chatham, of Hernando, for appellant.

*305Dinkins & Floyd and T. N. Gore, both of Marks, for appellee.

Argued orally by Herbert Holmes, for appellant, and by T. N. Gore, for appellee.

Cook, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

An execution was issued by the circuit clerk of Quit-man county on an enrolled judgment in favor of the appellant, C. E. Barham, and against C. D. Williams. This execution was levied on a warrant of Quitman county, payable to the said C. D. Williams, which at the time of the levy was signed, sealed, and detached from the warrant hook, ready for delivery to the payee, but still in the possession of the clerk of the board of supervisors *306of said county. Thereafter, and before sale of the warrant under execution, the appellee, R. P. White, filed an affidavit claiming the said warrant as his property, and, upon issue thereon tendered by the plaintiff in execution, the cause was heard and judgment entered quashing the levy, on the ground that the warrant was not subject to levy prior to its delivery to the payee thereof.

The court below based this ruling upon language of the court in the case of Beckett v. McCaslin, 161 Miss. 557, 137 So. 519, 520, wherein the court said: “a county warrant is but a voucher for an indebtedness, Cleveland State Bank v. Exchange Bank, 119 Miss. 868, 81 So. 170, and it has no vitality until it leaves the hands of the county officer, and is delivered to the payee or his agent. (Citing authorities.) Conceding for the purpose of the decision that the warrant would have been subject to levy as personal property of the payee, after completion of the issuance thereof by delivery, it had no vitality and was not subject to levy at the time the sheriff levied the execution and took it into his possession.”

Unless the language of the court above quoted is to be restricted, it appears to be controlling. The appellant urges as a distinguishing feature between that case and the case at bar that, in the Beckett case, the warrant had not been signed and sealed by the clerk at the time of the levy, while in the case at bar the warrant was complete with the exception of manual delivery to' the payee; and it is argued that the allowance of the claim by the board of supervisors, and the subsequent signing and sealing thereof by the clerk, constitute such symbolical delivery thereof as will subject it to' process against the payee. We do not think these cases can be distinguished on that ground. The Beckett case, supra, expressly held that a county warrant has no vitality and is not subject to levy until it leaves the hands of the county officer, and is delivered to the payee or his agent. Therefore, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Affirmed.
J-A21003-16 

NON -PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 

ESTATE OF LYDIA F. SHEARLDS 

APPEAL OF: DEREE J. NORMAN 

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA 

No. 3061 EDA 2015 

Appeal from the Decree September 11, 2015 

In the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County 

Orphans' Court at No(s): 384 OF 2015; File # 2315 -0941 

BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., DUBOW, J., and MUSMANNO, J. 

MEMORANDUM BY BENDER, P.J.E.: FILED NOVEMBER 08, 2016 

Deree J. Norman appeals pro se from the decree entered by the 

orphans' court on September 11, 2015, that denied his petition seeking to 

compel Michelle Shearlds to return personal property, i.e., the West Catholic 

class ring, which he claims was taken from the estate of Lydia F. Shearlds 

without consent of the Executrix, Maria Slocum. After review, we affirm. 

Initially, we note that Mr. Norman's brief contains a list of ten 

questions, but the argument section of his brief, which covers a little over 

two pages, is not divided into separate sections as required by Pa.R.A.P. 

2119(a) (stating, "[t]he argument shall be divided into as many parts as 

there are questions to be argued, and shall have at the head of each part ... 

the particular point treated therein, followed by such discussion and citation 

of authorities as are deemed pertinent "). Based upon this error alone, the 

arguments Mr. Norman attempts to put forth are difficult to assess, but we 

choose not to quash the appeal for this reason. 
J-A21003-16 

Rather, we review this case in relation to the issues raised, but also 

conclude that the orphans' court correctly determined that Mr. Norman did 

not have standing to file the petition to compel. Having examined the 

certified record, Mr. Norman's brief,' the applicable law, and the thorough 

opinion authored by the Honorable Chad F. Kenny, President Judge of the 

Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, dated February 2, 2016, we 

conclude that Judge Kenny's well- reasoned opinion properly disposes of the 

issues presented. Accordingly, we adopt Judge Kenny's opinion as our own 

and affirm the September 11, 2015 decree on that basis. 

Decree affirmed. 

Judgment Entered. 

J: seph D. Seletyn, 

Prothonotary 

Date: 11/8/2016 

' No other briefs were filed with this Court. 

-2
##### 



Exhibit 31(b) CERTIFICATION I, Robert A. Wolf, Chief Financial Officer of Viseon, Inc., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Viseon, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting;  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls. Date: September 28, 2004 /s/ Robert A.
Wolf
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             454
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  206,293
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,875
<INVENTORY>                                     19,095
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,449
<PP&E>                                       3,546,098
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,198,661
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,687,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          495,978
<BONDS>                                        591,139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       448,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,687,381
<SALES>                                        564,253
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               564,253
<CGS>                                          183,817
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  374,997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,758
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                162,497
<INCOME-TAX>                                    59,597
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            102,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  3,100
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    99,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-28516 

09-OCT-2012 

02:23 PM 

NO. SCWC-28516
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

GERARD R. LALES, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,
 

vs.
 

WHOLESALE MOTORS COMPANY, dba JN AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, JOHNNY


MARTINEZ, and GARY MARXEN, SR., Petitioners/Defendants-Appellees.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(ICA NO. 28516; CV. NO. 03-1-2415)
 

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ.,


and Circuit Judge Browning, in place of Pollack, J., recused)
 

Petitioners/Defendants-Appellees JN Group, Inc., fka
 

Wholesale Motors, Inc., dba JN Automotive Group, Johnny Martinez
 

and Gary Marxen, Sr.’s application for writ of certiorari, filed
 

on September 4, 2012, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled
 

for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate
 

clerk regarding scheduling.
 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 9, 2012. 

Christopher J. Muzzi for 

petitioners 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 Daphne E. Barbee for


respondent /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ R. Mark Browning
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                    GTE NORTHWEST INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY
        Statement of the Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in Millions)                                                 Nine Months Ended
                                                                      September 30, 1998
                                                                      ------------------

<S>                                                                        <C>      
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income before extraordinary charge                                       $   164.8
  Add - Income taxes                                                            95.8
      - Fixed charges                                                           44.5
                                                                           ---------
Adjusted earnings                                                          $   305.1
                                                                           =========
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                                         $    41.3
  Portion of rent expense representing interest                                  3.2
                                                                           ---------
Adjusted fixed charges                                                     $    44.5
                                                                           =========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                              6.86
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.33

 

Amendment No. 1 to the Consultant Service
 Agreement concluded on 1st October 2019

 

BETWEEN

 

Biophytis SA, a public limited company with a share capital of 5,362,650.80 euro whose registered office is located at 14 avenue de l’Opéra, 75001 Paris, registered with the Paris Trade and Companies Register under number 492 002 225 and represented by Mr Stanislas Veillet, duly authorised for the purposes hereof (hereinafter the “Customer”);

 

AND

 

SUCCESSFUL LIFE SAS, a simplified joint stock company with a sole shareholder, with a share capital of 1,000 euro whose registered office is located at 54 Rue Dombasle, 75015 Paris, registered with the Paris Trade and Companies Register under number 832 104 574 R.C.S. represented by Mr Jean Mariani, duly authorised for the purposes hereof (hereinafter the “Provider”).

 

The Customer and the Service Provider are hereinafter referred to collectively as the Parties and individually as a Party.

 

WHEREAS:

 

On 1st October 2019, Biophytis SA and Successful Life SAS concluded for a period of twelve (12) months, namely until 30 September 2020, a contract hereinafter “the Agreement” for the purpose of providing the Customer with the services of the “Chairman of the Scientific Committee” as well as scientific and strategic advice.

 

THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY AGREED:

 

ARTICLE 1: PURPOSE

 

The purpose of this Amendment No. 1 is to extend the term of the Agreement.

 

ARTICLE 2: TERM

 

The Agreement is extended for a period of twelve (12) months, namely until 30 September 2021 and will be renewed by tacit agreement.

 

The provisions of the Agreement not modified by this Amendment No. 1 and which are not contrary thereto, shall remain in force.

 

Done in Paris

 

In two copies On 1st October 2020

 

	
/s/ Stanislas Veillet
    	
 
    	
/s/ Jean Mariani
    
	
Biophytis SA
    	
 
    	
Successful Life SAS
    
	
Represented by Mr Stanislas Veillet
    	
 
    	
Represented by Mr Jean Mariani
#### JOHN CALDWELL *vs.*ISAAC MILLER.

A return of “ served by copy, left at a house *said*to be the boarding house of defendant,” is not sufficient *to*authorize a judgment by default.

Certiorari to Justice Wiley.

The return of service of the summons was *“*served on the defendant by leaving a copy at the house of Michael Kinch, said to be the boarding house of said defendantand it was held to be insufficient. The judgment was by default.

*J. A. Bayard,*for plaintiff in error.

Judgment reversed.

*Memorandum.*— During the winter vacation, the Hon. Thomas Clayton, Chief Justice of the State, resigned; and the Hon. John M. Clayton.,.of Kent, was appointed to succeed him.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JOHNSTON
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MARCH 29, 1997 AND
FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                         304,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               45,234,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,469,000
<INVENTORY>                                 67,733,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           127,538,000
<PP&E>                                     236,863,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             109,704,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             275,601,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       48,384,000
<BONDS>                                    144,881,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,000
<COMMON>                                     1,246,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,424,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               275,601,000
<SALES>                                     86,778,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            86,778,000
<CGS>                                       69,773,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               69,773,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,346,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               104,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,340,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,260,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   900,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,360,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 164,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,524,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Mrs. H. Hotchkiss NEAL, a widow, Appellant, v. Al C. AVERY, Mayor, J. Leroy Croft, James H. Jurney, Jack L. Sanders and George Talbot, Jr., as City Councilmen of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, City of Delray Beach, Florida, and William R. Haggart, Appellees.

No. 655.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 12, 1967.

Joseph D. Farish, Jr., and Theodore Babbitt, of Farish & Farish, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

John Ross Adams, Delray Beach, for ap-pellees city and city councilmen.

Ronald Sales, of Sales & Houston, West Palm Beach, for appellee Haggart.

*98PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, H. Hotchkiss Neal, appeals a final decree declining to grant an injunction restraining the defendants, Al C. Avery et al., and the City of Delray Beach, Florida, from relocating an alley.

The court has carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs and oral argument of counsel for the parties. From such consideration we find no reversible error.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS and CROSS, JJ., and WEISSING, LOUIS, Associate Judge, concur.
400

0 3800 3600 3400 3200 3000 2800 2600 2400 2200 2000 1800

1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 300 200 10075 50

79

1086

13579 108642

123456789 10

108642

13579

108642 .25 Hel

vetica .5 Helvetic

a

1 Helvetica

1.5 Helvetica

2 Helvetica

2.5 Helvetica

2.5 Arial

2 Arial

1.5 Arial 1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial .25 Hel

vetica .5 Helvetic

a

1 Helvetica

1.5 Helvetica

2 Helvetica

2.5 Helvetica

2.5 Arial

2 Arial

1.5 Arial 1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial .25 Hel

vetica .5 Helvetic

a

1 Helvetica

1.5 Helvetica

2 Helvetica

2.5 Helvetica

2.5 Arial

2 Arial

1.5 Arial 1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial .25 Hel

vetica .5 Helvetic

a

1 Helvetica

1.5 Helvetica

2 Helvetica

2.5 Helvetica

2.5 Arial

2 Arial

1.5 Arial 1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial .25 Helvetica .5 Helvetica

1 Helvetica

1.5 Helvetica

2 Helvetica

2.5 Helvetica

2.5 Arial

2 Arial

1.5 Arial 1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial .25 Hel

vetica .5 Helvetic

a

1 Helvetica

1.5 Helvetica

2 Helvetica

2.5 Helvetica

2.5 Arial

2 Arial

1.5 Arial 1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial .25 Helvetica .5 Helvetica

1 Helvetica

1.5 Helvetica

2 Helvetica

2.5 Helvetica

2.5 Arial

2 Arial

1.5 Arial 1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial .25 Hel

vetica .5 Helvetic

a

1 Helvetica

1.5 Helvetica

2 Helvetica

2.5 Helvetica

2.5 Arial

2 Arial

1.5 Arial 1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial .25 Helvetica .5 Helvetica

1 Helvetica

1.5 Helvetica

2 Helvetica

2.5 Helvetica

2.5 Arial

2 Arial

1.5 Arial

1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial .25 Helvetica .5 Helvetica 1 Helvetica 1.5 Helvetica 2 Helvetica 2.5 Helvetica2.5 Arial 2 Arial 1.5 Arial 1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial .25 Helvetica .5 Helvetica

1 Helvetica

1.5 Helvetica

2 Helvetica

2.5 Helvetica

2.5 Arial

2 Arial

1.5 Arial

1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial .25 Helvetica .5 Helvetica 1 Helvetica 1.5 Helvetica 2 Helvetica 2.5 Helvetica2.5 Arial 2 Arial 1.5 Arial 1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial .25 Helvetica .5 Helvetica

1 Helvetica

1.5 Helvetica

2 Helvetica

2.5 Helvetica

2.5 Arial

2 Arial

1.5 Arial

1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial .25 Helvetica .5 Helvetica 1 Helvetica 1.5 Helvetica 2 Helvetica 2.5 Helvetica2.5 Arial 2 Arial 1.5 Arial 1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial .25 Helvetica .5 Helvetica 1 Helvetica 1.5 Helvetica 2 Helvetica 2.5 Helvetica2.5 Arial 2 Arial 1.5 Arial 1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial .25 Helvetica .5 Helvetica 1 Helvetica 1.5 Helvetica 2 Helvetica 2.5 Helvetica2.5 Arial 2 Arial 1.5 Arial 1 Arial .5 Arial .25 Arial