Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2019
                              Shiloh First Health Care, Inc. DAB CR5499 (2019)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Shiloh First Health Care, Inc. DAB CR5499 (2019)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Shiloh First Health Care, Inc.
	(CCN: 747215),
	Petitioner,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-20-75Decision No. CR5499December 23, 2019

        
              
    

      DECISION ON REMAND
I reaffirm and incorporate by reference without modification the decision that I issued in this case on March 20, 2018, granting summary judgment in favor of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). *Shiloh First Health Care, Inc.*, DAB CR5052 (2018).
Petitioner appealed that decision to the Departmental Appeals Board (“Board”). On October 24, 2019, a Board appellate panel remanded the case to me, concluding that Petitioner had raised a genuine issue of material fact, thereby precluding the entry of summary judgment. *Shiloh First Health Care, Inc.*, DAB No. 2974 (2019). The appellate panel predicated its decision on the contents of an unsworn statement by Bibian Mukoro, who had been employed as a nurse by Petitioner. P. Ex. 2 in CRD Docket No. C-17-187. In its decision, the Board panel variously referred to Ms. Mukoro’s unsworn statement as an “affidavit” or a “declaration,” signifying that Ms. Mukoro had made it under oath or penalty of perjury.
However, Ms. Mukoro’s statement, being unsworn, is neither a declaration nor an affidavit and is a document that I would exclude from evidence were this case to proceed to a hearing. Consequently, that statement has no significance in deciding whether
Page 2
a material fact dispute exists.  For that reason, summary judgment remains the appropriate resolution of this case.1
At the heart of this case lie the questions of whether Petitioner’s staff reused a lancet device on multiple patients in violation of recognized standards of care and whether the staff used an improper technique for sanitizing the lancet after each use.  In my decision, I found that the undisputed material facts established that Petitioner’s staff did reuse a lancet and utilized an improper technique for sanitizing it.  *Shiloh*, DAB CR5052 at 3.  I based my decision on admissions made by Ms. Mukoro to a Texas state survey agency surveyor.  *Id.*  Ms. Mukoro’s statement attempts to rebut those admissions.  However, and as I have explained, Ms. Mukoro did not make any statements under oath or penalty of perjury.
The administrative law judge to whom this case originally was assigned issued an initial pre-hearing order.  That order told the parties that they must exchange as an exhibit the written direct testimony of any proposed witness.  The parties were instructed that:  “A witness statement must be submitted in the form of an affidavit under oath or as a written declaration that the witness signs under penalty of perjury for false testimony.”  December 21, 2016 Acknowledgment and Pre-hearing Order (“Order”) at 5, ¶ 8.
The Order also addressed the possibility of summary judgment, stating that:  “I will decide each motion for summary disposition according to the principles of Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and appropriate case law.”  Order at 4, ¶ 5.a.
Rule 56 unambiguously requires a party disputing an issue of material fact to establish a legitimate dispute based on admissible evidence.  “A party may object that the material cited to support or dispute a fact cannot be presented in a form that would be admissible in evidence.”  Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(2).
Ms. Mukoro’s statement is inadmissible as evidence because it does not comply with Paragraph 8 of the Order.  I would exclude this statement from evidence were Petitioner to offer it at a hearing.  Petitioner may not rely on that statement as a basis for establishing a fact dispute.
Petitioner argues that Ms. Mukoro’s statement establishes a fact dispute.  However, it has not shown how that statement would be admissible at a hearing.  For that reason, and as I have explained, Petitioner may not base its contention that there is a fact dispute on Ms. Mukoro’s statement.  Petitioner has not offered any other admissible evidence to
Page 3
establish a fact dispute in this case, and, for that reason, summary judgment remains the appropriate form for disposition.
Finally, Petitioner argues that CMS should be compelled to consider Petitioner’s offer of settlement.  I have no authority to compel CMS to consider or accept a settlement offer. Whether or not to accept a settlement offer lies entirely within CMS’s discretion.


          /s/
        Steven T. Kessel

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. In fairness to the appellate panel, it likely was misled by my mischaracterization at one point in my decision of Ms. Mukoro’s statement as an “affidavit.” I regret that erroneous characterization but, nevertheless, the fact remains that her statement is unsworn and not made under penalty of perjury, and is therefore inadmissible. back to note 1 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back