alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2020068EN.01006201.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/62

---

Action brought on 13 January 2020 — sprd.net v EUIPO — Shirtlabor (I love)

(Case T-19/20)

(2020/C 68/70)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: sprd.net AG (Leipzig, Germany) (represented by: J. Hellenbrand, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Shirtlabor GmbH (Münster, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘I love’ in black and red — European Union trade mark No 10 023 067

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation procedure

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 October 2019 in Case R 5/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 16(1)(a) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 16(1)(a) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the principle of non-arbitrariness. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principle of non-arbitrariness.

---
#### ENOCH HOLLIS *vs.*JONATHAN MORRIS.

A former recovery is conclusive as to all matters that might have been included in it, unless it be shown that the matter sued for was not in fact included in the former action.

If A. place his goods in the hands ofB. for a fraudulent purpose, a court of justice will not aid him to recover them back.

Assumpsit for the price of a gig and harness, sold and delivered. Pleas, non-assumpsit; payment: set-off, and the act of limitation.

The case was singularly circumstanced on the evidence. Admissions of the defendant that he had bought the gig were proved; and it was also proved that the plaintiff had repeatedly declared that he had *not*sold the gig to defendant, but had hired it to him.

The truth of the matter was, that Hollis, being in' failing circumstances, had placed this gig with other property in the hands of Morris, under pretence of a sale, but really to defraud his creditors. Morris afterwards refusing to give it up, Hollis brought an action of assumpsit (ante p. 3,) in which the defence was as to this gig, that it was not bought but hired. The jury gave a general verdict for the plaintiff, excluding, as he supposed, the price of the gig. The defendant then brought an action of trover for the gig, and recovered a verdict, (ante p. 4;) whereupon Hollis again sued him for the value of the gig.

The defence set up was fraud; and a former recovery; as to which,

Brinckloe, for plaintiff

Cullen, for defendant

*The Court*

charged,

1st. That the former recovery was conclusive on all subjects and causes of action that might have been included in the former suit, *unless*the plaintiff shows by proof, that the matter now sued for, was not in fact included in that action. 16 *Johns. Rep.*136; 2 *Ibid.*

*2d. That if the gig*was placed with the defendant by plaintiff, to defraud his creditors, and there was no actual bona fide sale of it, the plaintiff is not entitled to the aid of a court of justice to recover it back.

Yerdict for defendant
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Galen C. Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to
the annual report on Form 10-K of Coinstar, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                     |  |  |  |                |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  |  | COINSTAR, INC.
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 25, 2013 |  |  |  | By:            |  | /S/ GALEN C. SMITH     
|                     |  |  |  | Name:          |  | Galen C. Smith         
|                     |  |  |  | Title:         |  | Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2004 of Golf Host Resorts, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the
Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, R. Keith Wilt, Vice President & Treasurer
of the Company, certify, that:  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the company. /s/ R. Keith Wilt

Name: R. Keith WiltTitle:
    
    Vice President & Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)Date:
    
    September 24, 2004
Jacket: 571-333

Title: Case Bound Books

Agency: USGS

Bid Opening: 04-052024 at 11:00 AM

Bid Terms Discounted Total

$121,121.00 2.0% 20 days $118,698.58

$149,261.00 2.0% 20 days $146,275.78

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

Monarch Litho

Contractor Name

District Creative Printing
/
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 505 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 203

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 505

                          [Report No. 103-658]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 3841) to amend the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, the 
    Revised Statutes of the United States, and the Federal Deposit 
     Insurance Act to provide for interstate banking and branching.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 3, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                 House Calendar No. 203
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 505

                          [Report No. 103-658]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 3841) to amend the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, the 
    Revised Statutes of the United States, and the Federal Deposit 
     Insurance Act to provide for interstate banking and branching.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 3, 1994

    Mr. Frost, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 3841) to amend the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, the 
    Revised Statutes of the United States, and the Federal Deposit 
     Insurance Act to provide for interstate banking and branching.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
3841) to amend the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, the Revised 
Statutes of the United States, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to 
provide for interstate banking and branching. All points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read.
```
Exhibit
10.2.1 


 


FIRST AMENDMENT
TO EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to the Exclusive
License Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into and made effective the December 22, 2016 (the "Effective Date")
between JMH MD Holdings, having business offices at 6010 Aqua Path, Miami Beach, Florida 33141 (hereinafter referred to as "JMH
MD") and Longeveron, LLC, organized under the laws of Delaware, having business offices 1951 NW 7th
Avenue, Suite 520, Miami, FL 33136, (hereinafter referred to as " LICENSEE").


 


WHEREAS, the Agreement JMH MD and Licensee have
agreed to amend the Agreement as follows:


 


		1)	Section 3.l (a) of the Agreement is amended to state:



 


License Issue Fee of two
hundred and fifty thousand ($250,000.00) is due to JMH MD within five (5) days of the Effective Date of the Agreement.


 


		2)	Section 13 of the Agreement is amended to change LICENSEE's
Suite Number to 520.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized to be effective
as of the Effective Date.


 


	 		Longeveron Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Suzanne Page
			Suzanne Liv Page, J.D.
	Date: April 25, 2018	 	Chief Operating Officer


 


	 	 	JMH MD Holdings
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Joshua Hare
	 	 	Joshua M. Hare, M.D.
	Date:April 26, 2018	 	Manager


 


Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal C 411/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 411 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 598 November 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 411

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 598 November 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 411/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7902 — Marriott International/Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 411/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7902 — Marriott International/Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 411/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2016/C 411/03 | Commission Notice on certain articles of Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 411/02

Euro exchange rates

2

2016/C 411/03

Commission Notice on certain articles of Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 411/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8225 — GeoPost/Corfin 14/BRT) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 15 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 411/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8225 — GeoPost/Corfin 14/BRT) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

15

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
GPO Home
                Inspector General
                
            Report Fraud, Waste and Abuse
            
        
            Overview
            
        
            OIG Leadership
            
        
            Investigations
            
        
            Audits
            
        
            Inspections
            
        
            Semiannual Reports to Congress
            
        
            Plans and Reports
            
        
            Recommendations
            
        
            Whistleblower Protection Program
            
        
            FAQs about the OIG
            
        
            Complaint Form 
  GPO Home Inspector General
 Report Fraud, Waste and Abuse
                        
                    
                        Overview
                        
                    
                        OIG Leadership
                        
                    
                        Investigations
                        
                    
                        Audits
                        
                    
                        Inspections
                        
                    
                        Semiannual Reports to Congress
                        
                    
                        Plans and Reports
                        
                    
                        Recommendations
                        
                    
                        Whistleblower Protection Program
                        
                    
                        FAQs about the OIG
 Stay Informed - New OIG Reports Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse
 nathan deahlNATHAN J. DEAHL
                    Inspector General
 VACANT
                    Assistant Inspector General for Management and Policy
 cynthia lieCYNTHIA LIE
                    Counselor to the Inspector General
 Lori Lau DillardLORI LAU DILLARD
                    Assistant Inspector General for Audit
 connie greeneCONNIE M. GREENE
                    Assistant Inspector General  for Inspections
 Robert StachurskiROBERT STACHURSKI
                    Assistant Inspector General for Investigations
 Facebook
    **
    Twitter
    **
    Instagram
    **
    You Tube
    **
    Pinterest
    **
    Linkedin
    **U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE
Accessibility | Privacy | COOP  | Inspector General
#### Edward J. SANKNER et ux., Appellants, v. HERNANDO COUNTY and Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 72-475.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 15, 1973.

Frank McClung, Brooksville, for appellants.

Stephen F. Myers, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings & Evans, Tampa, for appellees.

*397HOBSON, Judge.

Reversed on authority of Elliott v. Hernando County, et al., 281 So.2d 395, Opinion filed August 15, 1973 (2d D.C.A.Fla.)

MANN, C. J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MID-WEST TEXTILE CO.,

 Appellant,

v.

GUADALUPE FIERRO,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-13-00093-CV

Appeal from the

210th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2011-DCV05558) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss appeal and 

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed, in accordance with 

the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal.

It is further ordered that each party bear their own costs. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 15TH DAY OF MAY, 2013.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-24-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-25-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-24-1999
<CASH>                                              43
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       63
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,133
<PP&E>                                             825
<DEPRECIATION>                                     331
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              989
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,767
<SALES>                                          2,595
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,595
<CGS>                                            1,859
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    151
<INCOME-TAX>                                        59
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 92
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        92
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
        

</TABLE>
# C_2020287EN.01003901.xml

| 31.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/39

---

Action brought on 9 July 2020 –Włodarczyk v EUIPO — Ave Investment (dziandruk)

(Case T-434/20)

(2020/C 287/58)

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Piotr Włodarczyk (Pabianice, Poland) (represented by: M. Bohaczewski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ave Investment sp. z o.o. (Pabianice, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark featuring the word ‘dziandruk’ in red and grey — EU trade mark No 15 742 091

Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 May 2020 in Case R 2192/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court and before the Cancellation Division and Board of Appeal of EUIPO; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court and before the Cancellation Division and Board of Appeal of EUIPO;

| — | in the alternative, order Ave Investment to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court and before the Cancellation Division and Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, order Ave Investment to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court and before the Cancellation Division and Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE

MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ETHAN THOMAS COMMINS

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 985

LT Case No. 2018

- CF

- 57891

- AX

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Opinion filed October 14, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Br evard County

, Stephen G. Henderson , Judge.

Matthew J. Metz , Public Defender,

and Andrew M ich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.2 We affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences that were imposed by

the trial court. We do so , however, witho ut prejudice to Appellant timely

seeking postconviction relief, if he can do so in good faith

. See generally

Lee v. State , 258 So. 3d 1297 (Fla. 201 8); State v. Shelley , 176 So. 3d 914

(Fla. 2015).

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., WALLIS and EDWARDS , JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 521 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 521

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       August 17, 1994.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (S. 2182) to authorize 
appropriations for fiscal year 1995 for military activities of the Department of 
Defense, for military construction, and for defense programs of the Department 
of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths for such fiscal year for the Armed 
Forces, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```