alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-110460, 333-115724, 333-15933, 333-24187 and 333-28415) of Magnetek, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses, and in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-58929, 333-04021, 333-17889, 333-45935, 333-45939, 333-90645, 333-90647, 333-75418,
333-129362 and 333-146898) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1989 Incentive Stock Compensation Plan of Magnetek, Inc., Magnetek, Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, Magnetek, Inc. Deferral Investment Plan, Magnetek, Inc. 1997 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, Magnetek, Inc. Amended and Restated Director Compensation and Deferral Investment Plan, 1999 Stock Incentive Plan of Magnetek, Inc., 2000 Employee Stock Plan of Magnetek, Inc., Magnetek, Inc. Employee
Stock Purchase Plan and 1999 Stock Incentive Plan of Magnetek, Inc., 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of Magnetek, Inc. and Executive Employment Agreement for Thomas G. Boren, and the Amended and Restated Director and Officer Compensation and Deferral Investment Plan, of our reports dated August 31, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Magnetek, Inc. listed in Item 15(a) and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Magnetek, Inc.,
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 28, 2009.











/s/ Ernst & Young LLPMilwaukee, Wisconsin





Date: August 31, 2009
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 529

To affirm this Nation’s tradition of hunting on wildlife refuges.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 21, 1994

Mr. WILLIAMS (for himself, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. LAROCCO,

Mr. HANSEN, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Ms. LAMBERT, Mr. FIELDS of

Texas, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. DICKEY, Mr. WALSH, Mr. BARCIA of Michigan,

Mr. CLEMENT, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. BREWSTER, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. HERGER, Mr. PARKER, Mr. PACKARD, Mr. EMERSON, and Mr.

BOUCHER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

RESOLUTION

To affirm this Nation’s tradition of hunting on wildlife

refuges.

Whereas the first national wildlife refuge was established in

1903; and since that time the number has grown to four

hundred and ninety-nine refuges located in all regions of

the United States;

Whereas the Refuge System can selectively accommodate a

variety of recreational uses and is authorized to do so

under existing law;

Whereas the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration

Act explicitly authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to

permit recreational hunting on national wildlife refuges;
2

•HRES 529 IH

Whereas recreational hunting is a traditional public use of

wildlife refuges enjoyed by millions of Americans;

Whereas recreational hunters provide vital funds for refuge

acquisition through Duck Stamp purchases and other

means;

Whereas recreational hunting is an important management

tool for maintaining certain wildlife populations and protecting biodiversity;

Whereas professional refuge managers have pursued policies

that helped protect endangered species and restore our

great herds of elk, deer, antelope, and flocks of migratory

birds;

Whereas some people for philosophical reasons would prohibit

appropriate and sometimes necessary recreational hunting on refuges and other public lands; and

Whereas the United States Fish and Wildlife Service is conducting a review of the public uses of National Wildlife

refuges, including traditional hunting and fishing, to determine the compatibility of these uses with refuge purposes: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Congress of the United States rec2 ognizes the need for and desirability of recreational hunt3 ing and fishing on national wildlife refuges; recognizes

4 both the financial and organizational support provided by

5 these recreational activities to our national wildlife refuges

6 and other Federal lands; and commends our professional

7 refuge managers who work diligently to enhance our wild8 life resources.

Æ
H. Res. 523

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

August 18, 1994.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 4603) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and

related agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and making supplemental appropriations for

these departments and agencies for the fiscal year ending

September 30, 1994, and for other purposes. All points of

order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered

as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
From: Christopher Bolduc [mailto:cabolduc@lbl.gov]  

Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 10:23 PM

To: Richard Parker

Cc: rick.anderson@faypwc.com; tballo@earthjustice.org; ScottB@lvmetals.com;

john.caskey@nema.org; jerry.corkran@cooperindustries.com;

john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov; adelaski@standardsasap.org; Teckman@nwcouncil.org;

gbf1@pge.com; carlos.gaytan@ge.com; rgreeson@federalpacific.com;

bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com; jhodge@howard.com; mhyland@appanet.org;

dave.millure@metglas.com; snadel@aceee.org; wes.patterson@us.abb.com;

Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com; Raymond.Polinski@atimetals.com;

artrosenfeld@gmail.com; srosenstock@eei.org; rroy@nrdc.org;

robert.saint@nreca.coop; chuck.simmons@pgnmail.com; BermanEconomics@gmail.com;

Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; greg.coulter405@gmail.com; Jim.creevy@nema.org;

ahofmann@publicpower.org; pkumar@publicpower.org; jmauer@standardsasap.org;

Aaron.Meyers@cooperindustries.com; jrossetti@mlgw.org; Paul.Ryan@hitmet.com;

jerry.schoen@aksteel.com; bsmith@federalpacific.com; mwaltner@nrdc.org;

kwinder@mleainc.com; cabolduc@lbl.gov; Brian Coffey; kcoughlin@lbl.gov;

brenda.edwards@ee.doe.gov; jeremiah.freeman@ee.doe.gov; Caitlin Johnson; Zhimei

Luo; emily.marchetti@ee.doe.gov; Michael Rivest; gjrosenquist@lbl.gov;

charlied@uus.org; phopkinson@hvolt.com; James.Lass@cleco.com;

maheshsampat@bellsouth.net; DYoung@energy‐solution.com;

chad.kennedy@us.schneider‐electric.com; eduardorobles@eaton.com;

vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com; thomas.patzner@us.schneider‐electric.com;

carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.com; Raba, Jim

Subject: MV Liquid‐immersed LCC and NIA Results

Dear Committee Members,

Please find the draft LCC and NIA results for liquid‐immersed medium‐voltage

transformers (design lines 1 ‐ 5) attached.

A summary of changes and additional sensitivities will be distributed before next

week's meeting.

Thank you,

‐‐ Chris Bolduc

‐‐‐‐ 

Chris Bolduc

Energy Efficiency Standards Group

Environmental Energy Technologies Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

t. 416‐535‐7546 c. 647‐832‐4021
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2428

HARRY G. NEMEC; ELIZABETH H. NEMEC, Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
JESSE MO RLEY, JR., Salesman #13477, Lowe's Home Center, Incorpor ated; JAMES REIKERT,Salesman #44306, Lowe's Home Center, Incorporated; JOHN ACHENG, Manager, Lowe's CorporateHeadquarters; GLENN A. WILSON, Technical Services, Hoover Wood Products; JOSEPH DOZIER, Vice President, Hoover Wood Products; ALLEN HORNE, Champion International Corporation,Forest Products; GARY BROUGHTON, Champion International Corporation, Forest Products; GARY YOUNG, Champion International Corporation,Forest Products; SHERI ELDRIDGE, Champion International Corporation, Forest Products; ALAN JONES, Champion International Corporation, Forest Products, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-407-2) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 22, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harry G. Nemec, Elizabeth H. Nemec, Appellants Pro Se. ColleenTreacy Dickerson, HEILIG, MCKENRY, FRAIM & LOLLAR, Norfolk, Virginia; Heather Ann Mullen, WILLIAMS, KELLY & GREER, Norfolk, Virginia; Thomas Brian Kelly, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, MCCAMMON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's order dismissing their diversity action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction after finding that they failed to establish that the amount in controversy exceeded $50,000. 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nemec v. Morley , No. CA-95-407-2 (E.D. Va. June 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
H. Res. 526

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

August 21, 1994.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider a further conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3355) to amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to allow grants to increase

police presence, to expand and improve cooperative efforts between law enforcement agencies and members of the community to address crime and disorder problems, and otherwise

to enhance public safety. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The

conference report shall be considered as read. The conference

report shall be debatable for eighty minutes, with twenty minutes controlled by the chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary, forty minutes controlled by the ranking minority

member of the Committee on the Judiciary, and twenty minutes controlled by Representative Castle of Delaware. The

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the conference report to final adoption without intervening motion
2

HRES 526 EH

except one motion to recommit, which may contain instructions only if offered by Representative Michel of Illinois or his

designee.

Attest:

Clerk.
CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brian  Richardson,  Chief  Financial  Officer of  DynaMotive  Energy  Systems
Corporation (the "Company"),  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

(i)               the Annual  Report on Form 20-F of the  Company for the fiscal
                  year ended  December  31,  2003 (the  "Annual  Report")  fully
                  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)              the   information   contained  in  the  Annual  Report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.




                    By: /s/ Brian Richardson
                    -----------------------------------------------
                    Name:   Brian Richardson
                    Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date:               May 17, 2004



This  written  statement  is being  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the  Company's  Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed
original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.

This  certification  accompanies  this  Annual  Report on Form 20-F  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall  not,  except to the
extent  required  by such Act, be deemed  filed by the  Company for  purposes of
Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended (the  "Exchange
Act").  Such  certification  will not be deemed to be  incorporated by reference
into any filing under the  Securities  Act of 1933, as amended,  or the Exchange
Act,  except to the extent  that the  Company  specifically  incorporates  it by
reference.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-14-0518

SAT Date: 5/6/2014

Print Date: 6/4/2014

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 3 Health: ; Eco: chronic concerns only

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 1 1 PMN

1 1 1 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ; PMN negl;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRRIT - E, S, L; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-14-0518

FATE: 

Liquid with MP < 0 C (M)

log Kow = 5.46 (E); 

S = 0.045 mg/L/reacts slowly at 25 C (E)

Hydrolysis half-life = days

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 8.61 (E)

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
log Fish BCF = 1.90 (E)

log Fish BAF = 3.10 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = PMN 90 via sorption and possible partial biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = PMN mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = PMN v.strong

PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt methyl 3-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]propyl silanediol. 

 P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = PMN negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes based on physical/chemical 

properties. Concerns are irritation of the eyes, skin and respiratory tract based on solvent 

irritation and MSDS information. There are also concerns for liver toxicity based on the alkyl 

silane moiety. Concern level is low - moderate. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value 0.081

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.10

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals; 

SAR chemical class = siloxane; MW 881; log Kow = 5.46 (EPI); liquid with mp < 0 C (M); S = 

0.046 mg/L at 20 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and 

mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

8

SARs neutral organic chemicals

SAR Class siloxane

Ecotox Category Neutral Organics

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
 

 SAT Chair: Doritza Pagan-Rodriguez

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 131 (Monday, July 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14581]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--PXI Systems Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 14, 2018, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. (``PXI 
Systems'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Coherent Solutions Ltd., Auckland, NEW ZEALAND, has been 
added as a party to this venture.
    Also, Circuit Check, Inc., Maple Grove, MN; Virginia Panel, 
Waynesboro, VA; Beijing Pansino Solutions Technology Co., Beijing, 
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; and Digalog Systems Inc., New Berlin, WI, 
have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    In addition, the following members have changed their names: VI 
Service Network to JX Instrumentation, Shanghai, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF 
CHINA; and Pentair Technical Solutions GmbH to nVent, Straubenhardt, 
GERMANY.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and PXI Systems intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 26, 
2018. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on April 24, 2018 (83 FR 17851).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-14581 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
EX 10.40




Fourth Amendment


to


Employment Agreement




This Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement(the “Fourth Amendment”), is being entered into effective March 10, 2011 by and between ImageWare Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Mr. S. James Miller Jr. (the “Executive”).





WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of September 27, 2005 and subsequently amended on September 27, 2008 and again on April 6, 2009 and again on December 10, 2009 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”);




WHEREAS, the Executive continues to perform valuable services for the Company and the Company desires to assure itself of the continuing services of Executive; and




WHEREAS, in consideration of the foregoing and in order to amend the terms of the Agreement and to provide for the continued services of the Executive in accordance with the present intent of the Company and the Executive.




NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in further consideration of the mutual covenants contained in the Employment Agreement, the parties do hereby agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:




1.
Section“2.Term of Agreement”strike the language “continue until December 31, 2011” and replace it with “continue until December 31, 2012”.




2.
Except as expressly amended herein, the Employment Agreement shall continue and be in full force in all respects.








/s/ ImageWare Systems, Inc.

/s/ S. James MillerImageWare Systems, Inc.

S. James Miller
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Larry BARR v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53891.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1973.

In re: Larry Barr applying for remedial writs and writ of habeas corpus.

Granted. Evidentiary hearing ordered.

SANDERS, C. J., SUMMERS and MARCUS, JJ., dissent from the granting of the writ.
# C_2020390EN.01004002.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/40

---

Action brought on 28 September 2020 — Unimax Stationery v EUIPO — Mitsubishi Pencil (UNI-MAX)

(Case T-591/20)

(2020/C 390/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Unimax Stationery (Daman, India) (represented by: A. Hempel and C. Schmidt, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mitsubishi Pencil Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark UNI-MAX in orange, red, white and black — European Union trade mark No 14 466 932

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 July 2020 in Case R 371/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Whitemark Homes, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
                November 26, 2007*/s/
                Douglas A. Kanter*Douglas
                A. KanterPresidentDate:
                November 26, 2007*/s/
                Russ Christensen*Russ
                ChristensenActing
                Principal Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Whitemark Homes, Inc. and will be retained
      by Whitemark Homes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.