alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jerome D. LOEHR.

No. 60737.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 1977.

In re: Jerome D. Loehr applying for writs of review.

Granted.

*1214The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Robert M. Fleming, Judge of the 16th Judicial District, Court for the Parish of St. Mary, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 28th day of November, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
# C_2020201EN.01005401.xml

| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/54

---

Action brought on 28 April 2020 — Biovene Cosmetics v EUIPO — Eugène Perma France (BIOVÈNE)

(Case T-232/20)

(2020/C 201/69)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Biovene Cosmetics, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Estella Garbayo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Eugène Perma France (Saint-Denis, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark BIOVÈNE — Application for registration No 16 052 029

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 February 2020 in Case R 739/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul and invalidate the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul and invalidate the contested decision;

| — | annul and invalidate the decision of the Opposition Division; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul and invalidate the decision of the Opposition Division;

| — | modify these decisions and agree the granting the application for the trade mark at issue in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

modify these decisions and agree the granting the application for the trade mark at issue in its entirety;

| — | order EUIPO and Eugène Parma France to bear the costs of the present appeal proceedings, the opposition and appeal proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and Eugène Parma France to bear the costs of the present appeal proceedings, the opposition and appeal proceedings before EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
#### EASTERN STEAMSHIP LINES, INC. v. FRANCE.

No. 38828.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 223 So.2d 574.
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed November 4, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-01138-CV
TRISTAN MICHAEL SIMON, Appellant V. JENNIFER NICOLE SIMON, Appellee
On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-21-10641

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justi ce Molberg, and Justice Pedersen Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellant filed a notice of appeal to ch allenge a default judgment for divorce.
Before the Court is appellant’s motion to di smiss the appeal beca use the trial court
has granted his motion for new trial. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

221138F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

TRISTAN MICHAEL SIMON, Appellant

No. 05-22-01138-CV V.

JENNIFER NICOLE SIMON, Appellee On Appeal from the 330th District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-21-10641. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Pedersen participating.

In accordance with this Court’s op inion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that appellee Jennifer Nicole Simon recover her costs of this appeal from appellants Tristan Michael Simon.

Judgment entered November 4, 2022.
EXHIBIT 32
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 Date: November 3, 2010

/s/ Jeffrey S. GormanJeffrey S. GormanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Wayne L. KnabelWayne L. KnabelChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 283 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 105

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 283

                          [Report No. 103-308]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 2492) making appropriations for the government of the 
  District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in 
 part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 26, 1993

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                 House Calendar No. 105
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 283

                          [Report No. 103-308]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 2492) making appropriations for the government of the 
  District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in 
 part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 26, 1993

   Mr. Derrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 2492) making appropriations for the government of the 
  District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in 
 part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That all points of order against the conference report to 
accompany the bill (H.R. 2492) making appropriations for the government 
of the District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or 
in part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes, are waived. The 
motions printed in the joint explanatory statement of the committee of 
conference to dispose of amendments in disagreement shall be considered 
as read.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN 0648-XG321

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice; public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Committee and River Herring and Shad Committee of the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) will hold a joint meeting.

# DATES:

                        The meeting will be held on Wednesday, July 18, 2018, from 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.. For agenda details, see                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                        .                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held via webinar with a telephone-only audio connection to participate:                         *http://mafmc.adobeconnect.com/​msb-rh-s/​.*                         Telephone instructions are provided upon connecting, or the public can call direct: (800) 832-0736, Rm: *7833942#.                    

*Council address:*                         Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331 or on their website at                         *www.mafmc.org.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 526-5255.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the meeting is to develop recommendations to the Council on the pending framework action that addresses Atlantic mackerel rebuilding, 2019-21 Atlantic mackerel specifications, and the river herring and shad cap for the Atlantic mackerel fishery.

## Special Accommodations

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should be directed to M. Jan Saunders, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior to any meeting date.

Dated: June 27, 2018.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2018-14136 Filed 6-29-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**LEONARD GEORDLEY ANGLADE,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 894 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 30th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allo wance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: GECU,

 Relator.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-11-00139-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Relator, GECU, asks this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against the Honorable

Linda Y. Chew, Judge of the 327th District Court of El Paso County. To be entitled to mandamus

relief, a relator must meet two requirements. First, the relator must show that the trial court clearly

abused its discretion. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second,

the relator must demonstrate that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Id. at 136. Based on the

record before us, we conclude that Relator is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the

petition is denied. See TEX.R.APP.P. 52.8(a).

June 15, 2011 

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

Chew, C.J., not participating
#### The FIRST STATE BANK OF MIAMI, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Patrick McGROTTY and Lansing J. Roy, Appellees.

No. HH-389.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 15, 1978.

*1274Robert A. Koppen of Koppen & Watkins, Miami, for appellant.

James L. Tomlinson and John F. Roscow, III, of Scruggs, Carmichael, Long, Tomlin-son, Roscow, Pridgeon, Helpling & Young, Gainesville, for appellees.

BOYER, Judge.

By interlocutory appeal the Bank seeks review of an order of the trial court relating to change of venue. Clearly one of the counts of the complaint places venue in Alachua County from whence appellant seeks to have venue transferred. Appellant claims that count of the complaint to be without merit and urges that the trial court, as well as this court, should determine the merit of that count of the complaint incident to a determination of proper venue. Determination of the merits of a properly stated cause of action is to be determined at trial and not upon venue issue. Further, even were we inclined to test the merits of the second count of the complaint on appeal, which we are not, it nevertheless appears that appellees’ position is supported by *Croker v. Powell,*115 Fla. 733, 156 So. 146 (1934) and *M. A. Kite Company v. A. C. Samford, Inc.,*130 So.2d 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961).

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and MASON, ERNEST E., Associate Judge, concur.
H. Res. 444

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

May 26, 1994.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4454) making appropriations for the legislative

branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and

for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule and shall

be considered as read. Points of order against provisions in

the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are

waived. No amendment shall be in order except those printed

in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this

resolution. Each amendment may be offered only in the order

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member des-
2

HRES 444 EH

ignated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not

be subject to amendment except as specified in the report,

and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All

points of order against amendments printed in the report are

waived. The chairman of the Committee of the Whole may

postpone until a time during further consideration in the

Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any

amendment made in order by this resolution. The chairman

of the Committee of the Whole may reduce to not less than

five minutes the time for voting by electronic device on any

postponed question that immediately follows another vote by

electronic device without intervening business, provided that

the time for voting by electronic device on the first in any

series of questions shall be not less than fifteen minutes. At

the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit, or to recommit with in-
3

HRES 444 EH

structions if offered by Representative Young of Florida or

a designee.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 320 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 320

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 22, 1993.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 3400) to provide a more effective, efficient, and responsive 
government. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points or 
order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and the amendments made in order by this resolution and 
shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader 
and the Minority Leader. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 
amendment under the five-minute rule. In lieu of the committee amendments now 
printed in the bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute specified in 
part 1 of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution 
shall be considered as adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. 
The bill, as so amended, shall be considered as the original bill for the 
purpose of further amendment. All points of order against the bill, as so 
amended, are waived. The bill, as so amended, shall be considered as read. No 
amendment to the bill, as so amended, shall be in order except those printed in 
part 2 of the report of the Committee on Rules. Each amendment may be offered 
and shall be disposed of only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 
only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable under the terms specified in the report, shall not be subject to 
amendment except as specified in the report, and shall not be subject to a 
demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 
Whole. All points of order against the amendments printed in the report are 
waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
Committee shall rise and report the bill, as so amended, to the House with such 
further amendment as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate 
vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the 
bill, as so amended, or to any further amendment in the nature of a substitute 
adopted in the Committee of the Whole. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill, as so amended, and any amendment thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit, which may not 
include instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# Official Journal C 112A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.112.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 112A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5619 April 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.112.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 112A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5619 April 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2013/C 112A/01 | Reserve lists — Open competitions — EPSO/AD/230/12 (AD 5) and EPSO/AD/231/12 (AD 7) | 1 |
| 2013/C 112A/02 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/247/12 — Head of unit (AD 12) — Site Management and Nuclear Safety Institute for Transuranium Elements (Karlsruhe, Germany), Joint Research Centre, European Commission | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2013/C 112A/01

Reserve lists — Open competitions — EPSO/AD/230/12 (AD 5) and EPSO/AD/231/12 (AD 7)

1

2013/C 112A/02

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/247/12 — Head of unit (AD 12) — Site Management and Nuclear Safety Institute for Transuranium Elements (Karlsruhe, Germany), Joint Research Centre, European Commission

7

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (DE/EN/FR) |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

112

(DE/EN/FR)

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 3/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 3 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 588 January 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 3

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 588 January 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 003/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2015/C 003/02 | Special Report No 20/2014 — ‘Has ERDF support to SMEs in the area of e-commerce been effective?’ | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2015/C 003/03 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 3 |
| 2015/C 003/04 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 3 |
| 2015/C 003/05 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 003/01

Euro exchange rates

1

Court of Auditors

2015/C 003/02

Special Report No 20/2014 — ‘Has ERDF support to SMEs in the area of e-commerce been effective?’

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2015/C 003/03

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

3

2015/C 003/04

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

3

2015/C 003/05

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2015/C 003/06 | Notice of open competition | 5 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2015/C 003/06

Notice of open competition

5

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN