alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23.1



                            INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Taitron Components Incorporated:

We consent to the inclusion of our report dated February 11, 1998, relating to
the balance sheet of Taitron Components Incorporated as of December 31, 1997,
and the related statement of earnings, shareholders equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1997,  which report
appears in the December 31, 1998, annual report on Form 10-K of Taitron
Components Incorporated.  This consent should not be regarded as in any way
updating the aforementioned report or representing that we performed any
procedures subsequent to the date of such report.




/s/ KPMG,LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 22, 1999
#### William Charles DREHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-855.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 25, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 12

GTE California Incorporated and Subsidiary

STATEMENT OF THE CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Three
                                                          Months Ended
                                                         March 31, 1998
                                                         --------------
<S>                                                         <C>      
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income continuing operations                              $108,096 
  Add - Income taxes                                          72,568 
      - Fixed charges                                         34,779 
                                                            -------- 
Adjusted earnings                                           $215,443 
                                                            ======== 
                                                                     
Fixed charges:                                                       
  Interest expense                                          $ 30,741 
  Portion of rent expense representing interest                4,038 
                                                            -------- 
Adjusted fixed charges                                      $ 34,779 
                                                            ======== 
                                                                     
CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                 6.19 
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                               Highwoods/Forsyth
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      18,157,000              18,157,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,053,000              27,053,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   555,000                 555,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            62,230,000              62,230,000
<PP&E>                                   2,688,257,000           2,688,251,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              87,046,000              87,046,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,707,240,000           2,707,240,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       52,152,000              52,152,000
<BONDS>                                    978,558,000             978,558,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                288,155,000             288,155,000
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                               1,388,375,000           1,388,375,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,707,240,000           2,707,240,000
<SALES>                                     89,687,000             266,933,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            91,214,000             273,165,000
<CGS>                                       27,748,000              76,743,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               44,093,000             124,003,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,522,000              10,216,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,623,000              47,394,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             30,976,000              91,552,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         30,976,000              91,552,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,411,000               6,945,000
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                23,420,000              71,490,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41                    1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41                    1.53


</TABLE>
# C_2020247EN.01003701.xml

| 27.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/37

---

Action brought on 27 May 2020 — TEAG v Commission

(Case T-315/20)

(2020/C 247/50)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: TEAG Thüringer Energie AG (Erfurt, Germany) (represented by: I. Zenke and T. Heymann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant's decision of 26 February 2019 declaring the merger ‘RWE/E.ON Assets’ compatible with the internal market, Case M.8871 (OJ 2020 C 111, p. 1); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant's decision of 26 February 2019 declaring the merger ‘RWE/E.ON Assets’ compatible with the internal market, Case M.8871 (OJ 2020 C 111, p. 1);

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The action is based on three pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those put forward in Case T-312/20, EVH v Commission.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 491 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 491

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 28, 1994.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2448) to improve the accuracy of radon testing products and services, 
to increase testing for radon, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 
shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. After general 
debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It 
shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment 
under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Energy and Commerce now printed in the bill. 
Each section of the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 
considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment 
the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments 
as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on 
any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT 13.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
The under signed , Gary Clifford, the Chief Financial Officer of CounselCorporation (the “Company”), has executed this certification in connection withthe filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s AnnualReport on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”).The undersigned hereby certifies that:
3. the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 4. the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Gary Clifford  Gary Clifford Chief Financial Officer
Date: June 17, 2004
13.2
Qualified Products List for Government Printing Papers

JCP Code O‐90 Printable Plastic Film (Synthetic Paper)                                                  

The brand names of synthetic papers listed below have been tested by U. S. Government Publishing

Office (GPO) and their physical properties were determined to meet the requirements of the JCP Paper

Standards.  Questions can be emailed to: qcimd@gpo.gov.

Brand Name/Product    Manufacturer/Supplier   Website

Teslin       PPG Industries     www.teslin.com

Expert Premium    AppFactory     www.appfactorydigital.com

Polyart       Arjobex       www.polyart.com

YUPO       YUPO       www.yupousa.com

REVLAR       RELYCO       www.relyco.com

Hop‐Syn     HOP Industries     www.hopsyn.com

Note:   Some of the synthetic papers listed are exclusively for offset printing.    Some of these papers can

be used for both offset printing and in copiers and printers.    Contact the manufacturer of the synthetic

paper for specific limitations and for end use applications.

This information is current as of October 2018.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17

                            [FRESENIUS MEDICAL LOGO]

                             C O N F I D E N T I A L

INTERNAL MEMO                                   FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE
                                                NORTH AMERICA
                                                Corporate Headquarters
                                                Executive Offices

TO:       Rice Powell                           95 Hayden Avenue
                                                Lexington, MA 02420

                                                Phone: (781) 402-9000, Ext. 4202
                                                Fax: (781) 402-9724
FROM:     Ben Lipps

DATE:     October 25, 2002

SUBJECT:  RETENTION BONUS
================================================================================

Rice,

Under your leadership, the Products Division has been a stable and successful
part of our business. You have developed a strong management team and led them
to meet the challenges in the industry and to focus on supporting FMC's business
initiatives. I commend you on your contributions and thank you again for all
your hard work and dedication to our success.

In anticipation of continued challenges and achievements, I would like to offer
you a retention bonus to ensure your continued contributions to FMC. The total
retention bonus would be equal to $300,000. The bonus will be paid over the next
three years: $100,000 in November 2003, $100,000 in November 2004 and $100,000
in November 2005 and would be contingent upon your continued employment through
November 2005.

Please indicate your acceptance of this retention bonus by signing below and
returning a copy of this letter to Brian O'Connell in Human Resources.

As with any compensation plan, this retention bonus is confidential. If you have
any questions, please discuss them with Brian O'Connell or me only. I look
forward to a continued strong working relationship with you as we face the many
challenges ahead.

CONCUR:

/s/ Rice Powell                                       10/15/02
-------------------------------------          --------------------------
    Rice Powell                                         Date
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying quarterly report of GIANT GROUP, LTD. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the 
Quarterly Report), I, Burt Sugarman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2004 
|                       
|/s/ Burt Sugarman      
|Chief Executive Officer
# C_2020414EN.01004401.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/44

---

Action brought on 5 October 2020 — Standardkessel Baumgarte Holding v EUIPO (Standardkessel)

(Case T-617/20)

(2020/C 414/66)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Standardkessel Baumgarte Holding GmbH (Duisburg, Germany), (represented by J. Vogtmeier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the procedure before EUIPO

Mark at issue: Application for the EU word mark ‘Standardkessel’ — Application for registration No 18 017 986

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 July 2020 in Case R 2665/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 77/388/EC by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia’

(COM(2004) 295 final)

(2005/C 120/20)

On 30 June 2004 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 262 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposal.

In view of the urgency of the work, the European Economic and Social Committee decided at its 412th plenary session of 27 and 28 October 2004 to appoint Mr Pezzini as rapporteur-general and adopted the following opinion by 121 votes for, none against and three abstentions.

1.   Introduction

2.   General comments

Brussels, 28 October 2004.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

----

(1)  Unemployment in the EU at the time was close to 10 %. The extraordinary Luxemburg European Council (1997) had focused on unemployment. Research by the European Academy of Avignon had revealed levels of undeclared work in the EU of up to 28 %. See also the EESC opinion on undeclared work (OJ C 101 of 12.4.1999, p. 30)

(2)  COM(2003) 397 final of 23 July 2003

(3)OJ C 209 of 22.7.1999

OJ C 32 of 5.2.2004

----
256 La. 850

#### William E. McCRAY, M.D. and William P. Cloyd, Jr., M.D. v. Jimmie D. COLE, Ph. D.

No. 50754.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 30, 1970.

In re: Jimmie D. Cole applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 236 So.2d 863.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

Limited to consideration of assignment of error no. 1. In all other respects the application is refused.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert Paul HEBERT v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53824.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1973.

In re: Robert Paul Hebert applying for writs of mandamus and habeas corpus

Granted. See Order.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Walter C. Peters, Judge of the 31st Judicial District Court for the Parish of Jefferson Davis, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 3rd day of December, 1973, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 21st day of January, 1974, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
EXHIBIT 15



November 13, 1997



To Mirage Resorts, Incorporated

We  are  aware  that  Mirage  Resorts,  Incorporated  has  incorporated  by
reference  in its  Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 33-16037),
on Form S-8  (File No. 33-48394), on  Form S-8 (File No. 33-63804), on Form
S-8 (File  No. 33-60183), on  Form S-3  (File No. 33-65317) and on Form S-3
(File No. 333-39029)  its Form  10-Q  for the  quarter ended  September 30,
1997, which includes our report dated November 13, 1997  covering  the  un-
audited  interim  financial  information  contained  therein.  Pursuant  to
Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a
part of these registration statements or a report  prepared or certified by
our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

Very truly yours,



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130874 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130874 

 COA: 264999 

Saginaw CC: 02-021048-FC 

ROBERT JAY JACKSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
Redirecting from /content/state-tax-information/ to /smarttax/tax-information-by-state
----

|                                                                           |                | Percentage               |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------------------------|
| Name      of Subsidiary                                                        | Country      of     | of      Ownership        |
|                                                                           |  Incorporation | (if      less than 100%) |
|                                                                           |                |                     |
|                                                                           |                |                     |
| Taitron      Components Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                                   | Mexico              | 60%                      |
| Taitron      Components Taiwan Branch (U.S.A.)                                 | Taiwan              |                     |
| Taitron      Components Incorporated e Representações do Brasil LTDA | Brazil              |                     |
| Taitron      (Yangzhou) Electronic Trade Co. Ltd. Shanghai Branch              | China               |                     |
| Taitron      (Yangzhou) Electronic Trade Co. Ltd.                              | China               |                     |
| Taitron      (Yangzhou) Electronic Co. Ltd.                                    | China               |                     |

----
Exhibit 21


LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT (1):

Subsidiary
----------

American Safety Razor Corporation

American Safety Razor of Canada Limited

ASR Holdings, Inc.

The Hewitt Soap Company, Inc.

Industrias Manufactureras ASR de Puerto Rico, Inc.

Megas Beauty Care, Inc.

Megas de Puerto Rico, Inc.

Personna International de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

Personna International Limited

Personna International UK Limited

Personna International (Deutschland) GmbH

Personna International de Puerto Rico, Inc.

Personna Israel Ltd.

Valley Park Realty, Inc.




(1) Each subsidiary is 100% owned by the Company or certain of its subsidiaries.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Bennie J. HUDGENS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 53810.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1973.

In re: Bennie J. Hudgens applying for writs of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The application is moot.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13

                             SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                               BORDERS GROUP, INC.
                         MANAGEMENT STOCK PURCHASE PLAN



         Borders Group Management Stock Purchase Plan (as amended, the "Plan")
is hereby amended in the following particulars effective as of March 21, 2002:

         1.       Paragraph (c) of Article 2 of the Plan is hereby amended to
                  read as follows:

                  "(c) "Annual Bonus" shall mean the bonus earned by a
                  Participant under the Annual Bonus Plan or as otherwise
                  approved by the Committee."

         Except as herein amended, the Plan remains in full force and effect.



                                          BORDERS GROUP, INC.



                                          By:  /s/ GREGORY P. JOSEFOWICZ
                                               ------------------------------
                                               Gregory P. Josefowicz