alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) I, Paul J. Mooney, Chief Financial Officer of Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corporation
(the registrant), certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of
Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Dated:
March 15, 2004
    
    /s/ Paul J. MooneyPaul J. MooneyChief Financial Officer
 86
H. Res. 171

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

May 20, 1993.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 873) entitled the ‘‘Gallatin Range Consolidation and Protection Act of 1993’’. The first reading of the

bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Natural Resources. After general debate

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original

bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule

the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by

the Committee on Natural Resources now printed in the bill.

Each section of the committee amendment in the nature of

a substitute shall be considered as read. Points of order

against the committee amendment in the nature of a sub-
2

HRES 171 EH

stitute for failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XVI are

waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for

amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to

the House with such amendments as may have been adopted.

Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on

any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to

the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a

substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. 1350

Each of the undersigned, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Gerber Scientific, Inc., hereby certifies that, on the date hereof:

(i)	The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gerber Scientific, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)	Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gerber Scientific, Inc.



|Date:  October 31, 2007 | /s/ Marc T. Giles                                                            | 
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                        | Marc T. Giles
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
IV

House Calendar No. 209

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 513

[Report No. 103–690]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4906) to amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to limit consideration of nonemergency matters in emergency legislation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 9, 1994

Mr. DERRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4906) to amend

the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act

of 1974 to limit consideration of nonemergency matters

in emergency legislation.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of

3 rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 4906) to amend the Congressional

6 Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to limit
2

HRES 513 RH

1 consideration of nonemergency matters in emergency leg2 islation. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed

3 with. All points of order against consideration of the bill

4 are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill

5 and the amendments made in order by this resolution and

6 shall not exceed one hour divided and controlled by the

7 chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

8 on Rules. After general debate the bill shall be considered

9 for amendment under the five-minute rule and shall be

10 considered as read. No amendment shall be in order except

11 those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules ac12 companying this resolution. Each amendment may be of13 fered only in the order printed, may be offered only by

14 a Member designated in the report, shall be considered

15 as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the

16 report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and

17 an opponent, and shall not be subject to amendment. All

18 points of order against the amendments printed in the re19 port are waived. If more than one of the amendments

20 printed in the report is adopted, only the last to be adopt21 ed shall be considered as finally adopted and reported to

22 the House. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill

23 for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the

24 bill to the House with such amendment as may have been

25 finally adopted. The previous question shall be considered
3

HRES 513 RH

1 as ordered on the bill and any amendment thereto to final

2 passage without intervening motion except one motion to

3 recommit with or without instructions.
House Calendar No. 209

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 513

[Report No. 103–690]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4906)

islation.ation of nonemergency matters in emergency legpoundment Control Act of 1974 to limit considerto amend the Congressional Budget and ImAUGUST 9, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### William O. REED, Appellant, v. Jule FINK and Julie Miron, Appellees.

No. S-322.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 20, 1973.

Andrew G. Pattillo, Jr., John P. Mc-Keever, of Pattillo, MacKay & McKeever, Ocala, Austin S. Mittler and Eric Von Salzen, and Hogan & Hartson, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Eli H. Subin, of Subin, Shams & Rosen-bluth, Orlando, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the' briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed and the appeal dismissed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 469 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 181
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 469

                          [Report No. 103-568]

  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 4650) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 1994

    Mr. Frost, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 4650) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That points of order against consideration of the bill 
(H.R. 4650) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes, for 
failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XXI are waived. During 
consideration of the bill, all points of order against provisions in 
the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are 
waived.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 181

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 469

                          [Report No. 103-568]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 4650) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 29, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
[No. 174-3.

Division Three.

April 12, 1972.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Robert E. Williams, *Appellant.*
263 La. 97

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Aubrey Leon HAYNES v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 52858.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 17, 1972.

In re: Aubrey Leon Haynes applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. The application for mandamus is moot in view of the return of the district judge. As shown therein, relator is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus on the merits.
Exhibit
10.29


 


REVENUE
PARTICIPATIOIN RIGHTS AGREEMENT


AMENDMENT
#1


 


THAT
REVENUE PARTICIPATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT is hereby AMENED as of this date to evidence the agreement of the parties to an abatement
and forbearance as follows:


 


WHEREAS


 


	 	A.	The
    original Revenue Participation Rights Agreement (the “Agreement”) although not fully executed and signed by both
    parties is acknowledged to have been entered into in 2018; however, due to certain extenuating circumstances the Parties agreed
    to delay any obligation of MJ Holdings until the 2020 accounting for the late 2019 harvest. 
	 	B.	The
    first amounts due under the Agreement was in April 2020 in the amount of $36,022.87, of which $14,422.37 has been paid.
	 	C.	The
    parties agreed that due to the negative impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, it is not in the best interests of the Parties to
    require MJ Holdings pay the balance that otherwise would have been due in 2020; to wit, $21,600.50.
	 	D.	The
    parties desire to waive the balance due as set forth above and extend the Agreement by one year for and in consideration of
    a fixed amount that will become due and payable in the final year of the contract. 


 


NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and undertakings set forth in this AMENDMENT #1, and the payment of $10.00,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows:


 


	 	1.	Accept
    as amended hereby that REVENUE PARTICIPATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) referenced above is reaffirmed,
	 	2.	The
    abovestated recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein,
	 	3.	Paragraph
    3. (a) regarding Yearly Calculation is hereby modified to add the following sentence at the end of the paragraph: “The
    2020 obligation is paid in full. On April 30, 2027, MJ Holdings shall pay an exit fee of $26,000.” 
	 	4.	Paragraph
    3. (b) regarding Annual Disbursement is hereby modified to add the following sentence at the end of the paragraph: “The
    2020 obligation is paid in full. In addition to the foregoing disbursements through May 31, 2026, on or before April 30, 2027,
    MJ Holdings shall pay an exit fee of $26,000.”


 


[Signatures
on the following page]


 




    	 	 	 



    	 	 	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this instrument to be duly executed and delivered this 8th day of December 2020.


 


	MJ
    HOLDINGS, INC.	 
	 	 
	By:
    	 	 
	 	Roger
    Bloss, Interim CEO	 


 


	LET’S
    ROLL NV LLC	 	BLUE
    SKY COMPANIES, LLC
	By
    its Managing Partner 	 	 	 
	BLUE
    SKY COMPANIES, LLC	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
    	 	 	By:
    	 
	 	Wallace
    Cheves, Manager	 	 	Wallace
    Cheves, Managing Partner
	 	BLUE
    SKY COMPANIES, LLC	 	 	 


 


[Signature
page for Amendment #1 to the Revenue Participation Rights Agreement]


 


The
balance of this page is intentionally left blank
#### Alexander BISCUITTI, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41736.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 20, 1972.

Rehearing Denied May 10, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 253 So.2d 750.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
258 La. 547

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. John MITCHELL v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51320.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 26, 1971.

In re: John Mitchell applying for writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, certiorari, and/or prohibition.

Writ refused. The trial court has ordered an evidentiary hearing in this case. The application to this court is now moot.
#### Nell MIMS, Appellant, v. J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, Appellee.

No. 1-316.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Aug. 1, 1967.

Sistrunk & Kaler, Jacksonville, for appellant.

James C. Rinaman, Jr., and Mattox S. Hair, of Marks, Gray, Yates, Conroy & Gibbs, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on ap*89peal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Grail v. Risden (Fla.App.1964), 167 So.2d 610; Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc. v. Patty, (Fla.1959), 109 So.2d 5; Commercial Credit Corporation v. Varn (Fla.App.1959), 108 So.2d 638.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
H. Res. 421

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

May 12, 1994.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (S. 2000) to authorize appropriations for fiscal years

1995 through 1998 to carry out the Head Start Act and the

Community Services Block Grant Act, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and

against its consideration are waived.

Attest:

Clerk.
Richmond.

#### Talley v. Town of South Boston.

April 10, 1924.

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Halifax county.

*Reversed.*

*William Leigh, Jr.,*and *Volney E. Howard,*for the plaintiff in error.

*Jas. S. Easley*and *Frank L. McKinney,*for the defendant in error.

Per Curiam.

This case involves the jurisdiction of the mayor of the town of South Boston over offenses committed more than one mile beyond the corporate limits of the town. This question was settled adversely to the claim of the mayor of said town in the cases of *Jordan*v. *South Boston, Gerst*v. *Commonwealth ex rel South Boston,*and *Banks v. Commonwealth ex rel South Boston, ante*page 838, 122 S. E. 265, decided at this term of the court For the.reasons stated in the opinion delivered in those cases, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Halifax county in this case will be reversed, the verdict of the jury set aside, and the case dismissed at the costs of the town of South Boston.

*Reversed.*
Exhibit
10.5


 


Power
& Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp. 

321 North Clark Street, Suite 2440


Chicago,
IL 60654

[●], 2021


 


XPDI
Sponsor LLC

321 North Clark Street, Suite 2440


Chicago,
IL 60654


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration
statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of
the securities of Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until
the earlier of (i) the completion by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in
each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination
Date”), XPDI Sponsor LLC (the “Sponsor”) shall take steps directly or indirectly to make available
to the Company certain office space, secretarial and administrative services (including without limitation certain financial modeling
and related services) as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 321 North Clark Street, Suite 2440, Chicago,
IL 60654 (or any successor location). In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay an affiliate of the Sponsor a sum of $10,000
per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. The Sponsor hereby agrees that it
does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the
“Trust Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”)
and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements
with the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


[Signature
Page Follows]


 






     


     

    

 





	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	POWER & DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:	Patrick C. Eilers
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer


 


[Signature
Page to Administrative Services Agreement]


 






    2


     

    

 


	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 
	XPDI SPONSOR LLC	 
	 	 
	By:	 	 
	Name: 	John McGarrity	 
	Title: 	Secretary	 


 


[Signature
Page to Administrative Services Agreement]


 


 


3
#### S. David MEYERS, Appellant, v. ALDEN DRUG, INC., a Massachusetts corporation, etc., Appellee.

No. 1680.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Dec. 20, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Official Journal C 64/18 F

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 64 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6218 February 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 64

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6218 February 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 64/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — first supplement to the 37th complete edition | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 64/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — first supplement to the 37th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN