Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2018
                              Opal Joiner, CRNA, DAB CR5118 (2018)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Opal Joiner, CRNA, DAB CR5118 (2018)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Opal Joiner, CRNA,
	(NPI:  1003884826)
	Petitioner,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
	Respondent
Docket No. C-18-363Decision No. CR5118June 15, 2018

        
              
    

      DECISION
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), acting through its administrative contractor, Novitas Solutions (Novitas), denied Petitioner Opal Joiner’s enrollment application pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(4).  Petitioner challenges the enrollment denial.  For the reasons discussed below, I affirm CMS’ denial of Petitioner’s enrollment application.
I. Background
Petitioner is a certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) who was licensed to practice in Texas and Florida.  On January 17, 2013, the Texas Board of Nursing suspended Petitioner’s nursing license, stayed the suspension, and subjected Petitioner to a two-year probationary period for use of controlled substances or chemical dependency.  P. Ex. 5 at 4-14.  On January 3, 2014, the Florida Board of Nursing, relying on the adverse action taken by Texas, suspended Petitioner’s license to practice in Florida.  CMS Ex. 11 at 13-16; P. Ex. 7.  The Florida Board of Nursing reinstated Petitioner’s license on August 25,
Page 2
2015.  CMS Ex. 11 at 6; P. Ex. 8.  The Texas Board of Nursing notified Petitioner on August 1, 2016 that she had met the terms of her probationary period and was eligible to apply for reinstatement.  CMS Ex. 2 at 30.
On January 19, 2017, Petitioner submitted an application to reactivate her enrollment as a supplier in the Medicare program.  *Id.* at 28, 45.  In Section 3 of the application, Petitioner marked the box “Yes” in response to the question “Have you, under any current or former name or business identity, ever had a final adverse legal action listed on page 12 of this application imposed against you?”  *Id.* at 15.  That section also provided a table for applicants to report “each final adverse legal action, when it occurred, the Federal or State agency . . . that imposed the action, and the resolution, if any.”  *Id.*  Petitioner reported the Texas Board of Nursing had suspended her license, and that she resolved the matter by completing the terms of the suspension.  *Id.*  Petitioner also indicated she had attached details, which were appended to her application.  *Id.* at 30-44.  She made no mention of the suspension imposed by the Florida Board of Nursing.
On July 7, 2017, Novitas notified Petitioner by letter that it denied her Medicare enrollment application because she had provided false or misleading information by failing to report an adverse action against her, in violation of 42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(4).  CMS Ex. 1 at 20.  Petitioner timely requested reconsideration, *see* CMS Ex. 9 at 5, which Novitas denied on October 24, 2017.  CMS Ex. 13.
Petitioner, through counsel, timely requested a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ), and I was designated to hear and decide this case.  On December 22, 2017, I issued an Acknowledgment and Pre‐hearing Order (Pre‐hearing Order) setting forth a briefing schedule.  CMS submitted its pre-hearing exchange consisting of a motion for summary judgment (CMS Br.), thirteen exhibits, and its exhibit list, on February 1, 2018.  On March 1, 2018, Petitioner filed her pre-hearing exchange consisting of her motion for summary judgment (P. Br.), fifteen exhibits, and witness and exhibit lists.
II. Admission of Exhibits and Decision on the Record
There being no objection from Petitioner, I admit CMS Exhibits 1 through 13 into the record.  Similarly, with no objection from CMS as to Petitioner’s exhibits, I admit Petitioner Exhibits 1 through 15 into the record.
Petitioner has proposed four witnesses, but failed to submit their direct written testimony as explicitly required in my initial acknowledgment order.  Pre-hearing Order at 5.  Even if she had provided this testimony in writing, CMS has not identified witnesses to testify in this matter or requested cross‐examination of Petitioner’s witnesses.  Consequently, I
Page 3
will not hold an in-person hearing in this matter, and I issue this decision based on the written record.1
 CRDP § 19(d).
III. Issues
Whether CMS has a legitimate basis under 42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(4) to deny Petitioner’s enrollment application seeking Medicare billing privileges for submitting false or misleading information on the enrollment application.
IV. Jurisdiction
I have jurisdiction to decide this case.  42 C.F.R. §§ 498.3(b)(17), 498.5(*l*)(2).
V. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Analysis
**A. Applicable Law.**
As a CRNA, Petitioner is a supplier of health care services for purposes of the Medicare program.  *See* 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(d); 42 C.F.R. §§ 400.202 (definition of supplier), 410.69(b).  In order to participate in the Medicare program as a supplier, an individual must meet certain criteria to enroll and receive billing privileges.  42 C.F.R. §§ 424.505, 424.510.  CMS may deny a supplier’s enrollment for any reason stated in 42 C.F.R. § 424.530, which includes providing false or misleading information:
(4)  *False or misleading information.*  The provider or supplier has submitted false or misleading information on the enrollment application to gain enrollment in the Medicare program.  (Offenders may be referred to the Office of Inspector General for investigation and possible criminal, civil, or administrative sanctions.)
42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(4).
**B. CMS properly denied Petitioner’s enrollment application because she submitted false or misleading information in that application.**
The relevant and dispositive facts are not in dispute.  The Texas Board of Nursing took adverse action against Petitioner in January 2013, suspending her nursing license and then staying that suspension while imposing a two-year probationary period to address Petitioner’s chemical dependency issues.  P. Ex. 5 at 4-14.  The state of Florida, where
Page 4
Petitioner was also licensed, took its own disciplinary action as a result and suspended Petitioner’s nursing license in January 2014.  CMS Ex. 11 at 13-16.  The application for enrollment Petitioner submitted in January 2017 clearly asked her to identify any adverse legal actions imposed against her, and further defined such actions to include “any revocation or suspension of a license to provide health care by any State licensing authority.”  CMS Ex. 2 at 14.  That application also required Petitioner to certify that her answers were “true, correct, and complete.”  CMS Ex. 2 at 27.  Petitioner clearly identified her suspension and probation in Texas as an adverse action against her, but failed to disclose the related Florida suspension.  CMS Ex. 2 at 15.  Accordingly, the record demonstrates a legitimate basis for CMS to deny Petitioner’s enrollment application.  42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(4).
In response, Petitioner does not deny the existence of the Florida suspension or her failure to report it in her application.  Instead, she first argues she was not required to disclose the Florida suspension because Florida’s action was improper, given the expired status of her license at the time.  P. Br. at 5-9.  Petitioner’s argument kicks up an impressive cloud of dust, but fails to obscure the unavoidable outcome here.  Even if she believed at the time of her enrollment application that Florida had improperly suspended her license (an assumption for which there is no evidentiary support), the plain terms of the application required Petitioner to disclose the suspension, even if her attorney later discovered a reason to attack its validity.  Her argument is therefore without merit.
Petitioner also confusingly cites 42 C.F.R. § 424.516 for the proposition that she retains the right to correct her application, well after the fact.  P. Br. at 9.  That regulation obliges applicants to update their pending applications upon discovery of information that would render any part of the application untrue, incomplete, or incorrect.  P. Ex. 13 at 26.  But Petitioner obviously knew of her suspension in Florida prior to the submission of this application for enrollment.  In any case, the regulation in question requires applicants to report adverse legal actions (the provision to which Petitioner presumably refers) within 30 days of that action.  42 C.F.R. § 424.516(d)(1)(ii).
Petitioner also asserts CMS violated her due process rights by citing a different omission from her application in its brief before me than that found in its reconsidered determination.  P. Br. at 10-11.  Specifically, she believes CMS improperly relies on her failure to disclose her revocation of billing privileges by CMS administrative contractor First Coast Services.  P. Br. at 5-6, citing CMS Br. at 4.  This argument is something of a red herring; even if true that CMS could not properly cite that omission in its brief before me, it is clear CMS’ contractor Novitas relied solely on her failure to report the suspension of her Florida license, at both the initial and reconsidered levels, to deny her enrollment.  CMS’ reference to the billing revocation in its summary judgment motion, even if improper, is irrelevant to the outcome before me.  I rely solely on Petitioner’s failure to report her license suspension by the state of Florida in her application to determine CMS was authorized to deny her enrollment.  Petitioner has received adequate
Page 5
notice of the basis for denial of her enrollment application and has been afforded sufficient opportunity to contest that decision at several levels of administrative decision-making, including formal adjudication before me.  Her due process claim is without merit.
Finally, Petitioner argues in passing that her failure to disclose her suspension in her application was not deliberate and at worst, a mistake.  P. Br. at 11.  But even if I credit Petitioner with entirely benign motives in her failure to identify one of two license suspensions imposed against her, the Departmental Appeals Board has consistently observed in a similar context that where false or misleading information was submitted on an application, CMS need not show evidence of intent to mislead or to misrepresent.  Instead, CMS must show an applicant submitted false or misleading information certified to be true in his or her application.  *Sandra E. Johnson, CRNA*, DAB No. 2708 at 15 (2016), (quoting *Mark Koch, D.O.*, DAB No. 2610 at 4-5 (2014)); *Patrick Brueggeman, D.P.M.*, DAB No. 2725 (2016).  As I have explained, the record clearly supports such a finding.
VI. Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, I affirm CMS’ determination to deny Petitioner’s Medicare enrollment application.


          /s/
        Bill Thomas

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. As such, I need not address the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, which are denied as moot.  However, as I discuss further below, there is no dispute as to the material facts, which incontrovertibly lie in CMS’ favor, and which Petitioner does not attempt to rebut. back to note 1 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back