alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Talon Installation Installation Installation Installation instructions instructions instructions instructions

HOT News!!! This new type UAV is sweeping over the FPV market like fire. Talon can fly stably with large lifting force and small resisting force, and the thrust-weight ratio is only 0.2~0.3:1.
1. With 4S 15000MAH battery,the flying weight is only 2.4KG, and if you equip it with different kinds of aerial tools, its weights just 3KG and wing load is only 48g/dm2.
2. Talon works well under the condition of strong breeze.
3. Easy for installment, detachment and carrying.

Welcome aeromodelling fans, FPV fans, and UAV fans to find our deficiencies!

Material: EPO Wingspan: 1718mm Length : 1100mm Flying Weight: 2500~3000g(88~106oz)
Thrust Force : 3000g WingArea:60 m2 (750sq.in) Wingload:55~66g/d m2 (18~21.6oz/sq.ft)
Drive System: 3648 KV1100 motor ESC : 70A
Servo: 2*9g 2*17g servos Propeller: ≤ 12in Battery: 14.8V, Li-polymer
Control system:4 CH 2.4GHz Transmitte

The main distributor: FPV MODEL ( http://www.fpvmode l .com )

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL



# f·

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL

# X-UAV**FP ~**  NIO!!EL
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 927 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.927
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                                 An Act

  
 
  To designate the Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania as the 
National

                          Aviary in Pittsburgh.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is designated as 
the ``National Aviary in Pittsburgh''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or 
other paper of the United States to the aviary referred to in section 1 
is deemed to be a reference to the ``National Aviary in Pittsburgh''.







                                Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                             Vice President of the United States and    
                                                President of the Senate.`
#### Percy FONTENOT et al. v. Alton OSCHNER, Jr., et al.

No. 61977.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 5, 1978.

In re: Alton Oschner, Jr., et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Evangeline.

Not considered. „Not timely filed. See Rules of Supreme Court Rule X, Sec. 5(b).
#### Lessee of GEORGE GREGG *vs.*JOHN McDANIEL.

Verdict set aside for the introduction of intoxicating liquor into the jury room,

Itt this case, after a trial at bar, and verdict for plaintiff;

*The Court,*

on motion, and after argument, set the verdict aside, and granted a new trial, on the ground that intoxicating liquor had been introduced into the jury room and used, pending their deliberations.

*368
      *Rodney, R. H. Bayard*and *Whitely,*for plaintiff.

*Gray*and *J. A. Bayard,*for defendant.

In the argument of this motion, the following authorities were cited: 1 *Burr. Rep.*393; 1 *Wm. Blac.*348; 7 *Cowen Rep.*362; 4 *Ibid*31-6; 2 *Tidd Pr.*814-15-16; *Bac. Abr. Verd. H.*8, 11.
# Mar 2023
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 486 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 486

 Returning to the Senate S. 729, to amend the Toxic Substances Control 
          Act to reduce the levels of lead in the environment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 1994

 Mr. Gibbons submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Returning to the Senate S. 729, to amend the Toxic Substances Control 
          Act to reduce the levels of lead in the environment.

    Resolved, That the bill of the Senate (S. 729) to amend the Toxic 
Substances Control Act to reduce the levels of lead in the environment, 
and for other purposes, in the opinion of this House, contravenes the 
first clause of the seventh section of the first article of the 
Constitution of the United States and is an infringement of the 
privileges of this House and that such bill be respectfully returned to 
the Senate with a message communicating this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2020262EN.01003401.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/34

---

Action brought on 15 June 2020 — Poupart v Commission

(Case T-376/20)

(2020/C 262/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Nicole Poupart (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of 1 October 2019 to apply the rules of the Staff Regulations in force since 1 May 2004 to the calculation of her old-age pension; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 1 October 2019 to apply the rules of the Staff Regulations in force since 1 May 2004 to the calculation of her old-age pension;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of her action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law alleging infringement of Articles 21 and 22 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.

---
# C_2023286EN.01000601.xml

| 14.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2023 — TUIfly GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-763/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Measures put into effect by the Republic of Austria for Klagenfurt airport, Ryanair and other airlines using that airport - Decision declaring the aid measures partially incompatible with the internal market - Article 107(1) TFEU - Private investor in a market economy - Ex ante incremental profitability analysis - Long-term profitability of the airport - Applicability - Article 107(3)(c) TFEU - Aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas - Relevant assessment criterion for determining compatibility with the internal market - Profitability of the new air routes)

(2023/C 286/06)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: TUIfly GmbH (represented by: L. Giesberts, D and J. Westarp, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck, A. Bouchagiar and J. Ringborg, Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | TUIfly GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

TUIfly GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.

---
Verizon California Inc.





EXHIBIT 99





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Verizon California Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods presented in the Report.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Dated: May 13, 2003 |  | /s/    LAWRENCE T. BABBIO, JR.                                           
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | Lawrence T. Babbio, Jr. Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|                   
|Dated: May 13, 2003 |  | /s/    LAWRENCE R. WHITMAN                                               
|                    |  | Lawrence R. Whitman Chief Financial Officer                              





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Verizon California Inc. and will be retained by Verizon
California Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,389
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                34,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     77,950
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          69,551
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            67,472
<LOANS>                                        350,549<F1>
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,059
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 571,777
<DEPOSITS>                                     420,803
<SHORT-TERM>                                    66,249
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,793
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,668
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 571,777
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 27,853
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,582
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   581
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                38,016
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,922
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,433
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           19,583
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      360
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 132
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 13,447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,065
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,065
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,552
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.60
<LOANS-NON>                                          8
<LOANS-PAST>                                       219
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   104
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,279
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      971
<RECOVERIES>                                       391
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,059
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,059
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
<F1>New of allowance for loan losses of $5,059.
</FN>


</TABLE>
H. Res. 461

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

June 23, 1994.

Resolved, That points of order against consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4603) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and

related agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and making supplemental appropriations for

these departments and agencies for the fiscal year ending

September 30, 1994, and for other purposes, for failure to

comply with clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI or clause 7 of rule XXI

are waived. During consideration of the bill, all points of

order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with

clause 2 of rule XXI are waived except as follows: beginning

with ‘‘notwithstanding’’ on page 3, line 18, through ‘‘Act,’’ on

line 19; beginning with ‘‘That’’ on page 36, line 16, through

‘‘Provided further,’’ on page 37, line 6; and beginning with

‘‘: Provided’’ on page 48, line 25, through ‘‘Treasury’’ on

page 49, line 4. Where points of order are waived against

only part of a paragraph, any point of order against matter

in the balance of the paragraph may be applied only within
2

HRES 461 EH

the balance of the paragraph and not against the entire paragraph. The amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall have precedence over a motion that the Committee of the Whole rise

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as

may have been adopted, if the amendment is offered by a

Member designated in the report.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Deer Island Fish & Oyster Co. *v.*First Nat. Bank of Biloxi.

(Division A.

March 4, 1935.)

[159 So. 656.

No. 30279.]

For prior opinion, see 166 Miss. 162, 146 So. 116.

*285Ford, White *&*Morse, of Gulfport, for clerk and court reporter.

R. W. Boydstun, of Louisville, for the motion to retax costs.

Smith, C. J.,

delivered! the opinion of the court.

The court costs on the appeal herein were taxed by the clerk of this court, paid to him by the appellee, which was charged therewith, and paid by the clerk of this court to the clerk of the court below. A motion has now been made setting forth that the costs so1 paid were excessive, and requesting a retaxation thereof.

Among the several objections made to the motion is, first, R. W. Boydstun, the attorney by whom the motion was filed, is engaged in representing to litigants, against whom costs have been awarded in cases' heretofore decided by this court, that the costs taxed against them and paid are excessive, and offering to obtain a retaxation thereof for a compensation; and that authority to file the ¡motion herein was so obtained; second, the certificate filed with the motion setting forth that the costs are excessive, in accordance with rule 21A of this court, was not made by a “disinterested person.”

The first of these objections presents a very grave charge against the attorney, as will appear from Ex Parte Latham, 161 Miss. 243, 136 So. 625. Whether the charge, if true, would present a matter for action here is not before us, for the proof fails to sustain the charge, the evidence in support thereof being only the ex parte affidavit of the clerk of the court below.

Rule 21A of this court is as follows: “When a complaint is made, in a motion to retax the costs incurred in this court, that a fee allowed based on the number of words of the' instrument, or transcript thereof, or the transcript of the record as an entirety, is incorrect, the *286motion shall be accompanied by a written statement of the true number of snob words, with a certificate of its correctness by a competent disinterested person; without' which no such complaint will be considered.”

The certificate setting forth that the costs allowed and paid are excessive was made by Mrs. W. B. Books, who is the mother-in-law of the attorney by whom this motion was filed. Under his contract with the appellee, the compensation of this attorney for filing the motion is to be one-half of the amount collected thereby. The attorney, therefore, is an interested party here, and his kinship' by affinity to Mrs. Hooks is too near for us to hold that she is a disinterested person within the meaning of rule 21 A. Since the rule'provides that unless a certificate is made by a “disinterested person,” the motion to retax the costs will not be considered, this motion must and will be dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 40 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 40

           Concerning United States assistance to Nicaragua.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 1993

Mr. Penny submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
           Concerning United States assistance to Nicaragua.

Whereas the Nicaraguan economy and people continue to suffer from the effects of 
        the recent civil war and require international attention and assistance;
Whereas the suspension of United States assistance to Nicaragua has contributed 
        to the economic hardship and social unrest, and threatens to undermine 
        the progress which has been made in recent years in the areas of 
        economic, political, and military reform;
Whereas the civil war in Nicaragua has ended and the competing military forces 
        have been largely demobilized and reduced in size;
Whereas the new democratic government has successfully dealt with such 
        macroeconomic problems as hyperinflation and currency stabilization; and
Whereas despite some improvement, there are persistent problems in Nicaragua 
        concerning private property rights, human rights, and military spending: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the President should--
            (1) release all humanitarian, development, and economic 
        assistance that was authorized and appropriated by Congress for 
        Nicaragua in fiscal years 1992 and 1993;
            (2) direct development-related assistance to small farmers 
        and businesses, maternal and child health care programs, 
        education programs for children, and programs that will assist 
        Nicaragua in strengthening and deepening institutions that 
        promote democracy, human rights, and the rule of law; and
            (3) encourage the democratically elected government of 
        Nicaragua to make progress in resolving property disputes, 
        investigating and prosecuting all reported violations of human 
        rights, and reducing military expenditures to regional levels.

                                 <all>
```
[No. 669-1.

Division One—Panel 1.

December 13, 1971.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Charles Russell, *Appellant.*
# C_2022222EN.01002501.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/25

---

Order of the President of the Court of 4 February 2022 — Czech Republic v Republic of Poland, intervener in support of the applicant: European Commission

(Case C-121/21) (1)

(2022/C 222/37)

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Grand Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 14.4.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              11
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      883
<ALLOWANCES>                                        27
<INVENTORY>                                         27
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   903
<PP&E>                                            4357
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              830
<BONDS>                                            648
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           650
<OTHER-SE>                                         248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2897
<SALES>                                           1292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1292
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    (268)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1512
<INCOME-TAX>                                       542
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                971
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      5
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       966
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>