alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

1000 DEFENSE PENTAGON 

WASHINGTON, DC 20301 - 1000 

AUG 1 6 2012 

MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS 

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF 

DIRECTORS OF THE DEFENSE AGENCIES 

DIRECTORS OF THE DOD HELD ACTIVITIES 

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Small Business Contracting 

Small businesses are a key component of the Defense industrial base. As the acquisition 

community works to provide our Warfighters with the tools necessary to accomplish their 

missions safely and successfully, small businesses significantly contribute to the depth and 

breadth of products, services, and solutions. It is up to you to take advantage of current 

opportunities to utilize small businesses as we support our Warfighters. 

The FY 2012 small business prime contracting goal for the Department is 22.5 percent. 

Thus far this fiscal year, we are not meeting our goal and must take immediate action. 

Throughout the remaining months of this fiscal year and throughout FY 2013, you are to 

maximize the use of all available authorities to acquire products and services from small 

, businesses in support of our Warfighters and to achieve the Department's goals. 

cc: 

Directors, Office of Small Business Programs 

OSD009984-12
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 30937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14101]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 16, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. James Bradley Doran, Columbia, Missouri; to acquire voting 
shares of Green City Bancshares, Inc., Green City, Missouri, and 
thereby indirectly acquire Farmers Bank of Green City, Green City, 
Missouri.
    In addition, James Bradley Doran has applied to become a member of 
the Doran/Grotenhuis Family Group, which owns voting shares of Green 
City Bancshares.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 26, 2018.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-14101 Filed 6-29-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Howard
S. Modlin, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, and I,
William G. Henry, Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial
Officer, each of General DataComm Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), do each
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

      (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2006 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      This Certification accompanies this Form 10-QSB as an exhibit, but shall
not be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the
certifying officer.



                                     /s/ Howard S. Modlin
                                     --------------------
Date: May 15, 2006                   Howard S. Modlin,
                                     Chairman of the Board, President and
                                     Chief Executive Officer


                                     /s/ William G. Henry
                                     --------------------
                                     William G. Henry
                                     Vice President, Finance and Administration
                                     and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 194 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 194

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the proposed 
 tax increase on social security benefits should not be enacted and if 
                      enacted should be repealed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1993

  Mr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Canady, Mr. Bunning, Mr. 
 Dornan, Mr. Baker of Louisiana, Mr. Blute, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Walsh, 
 Mrs. Vucanovich, Mr. Pombo, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Inglis of South Carolina, 
 Mr. Emerson, Mr. Zimmer, Mr. Rogers, Mr. Bachus of Alabama, Mr. King, 
  Mrs. Fowler, Mr. Roth, Mr. Franks of New Jersey, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. 
   Royce, and Mr. Kyl) submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the proposed 
 tax increase on social security benefits should not be enacted and if 
                      enacted should be repealed.

Whereas the House of Representatives has narrowly passed President Clinton's 
        budget proposal;
Whereas a diverse of coalition of senior citizen groups, along with the vast 
        majority of grassroots seniors nationwide, are opposed to the social 
        security tax increase included in the budget;
Whereas over 9,000,000 social security recipients will be adversely affected by 
        a social security tax increase proposal;
Whereas those affected by this taxation will pay on average an extra $483 per 
        year;
Whereas without an inflation adjustment, the percentage of affected seniors who 
        are in effect taxed twice on the same income will rise significantly in 
        5 years;
Whereas the social security tax proposal is the only part of the President's 
        plan which concedes to be a targeted tax increase on a segment of the 
        middle class;
Whereas many fixed income senior citizens cannot be without these much-needed 
        benefits in this current economic climate;
Whereas senior citizens have historically shared a heavy burden and been the 
        target of numerous measures, such as a freeze in their cost-of-living 
        adjustment and the implementation of the social security tax; and
Whereas such a tax increase would affect not only current middle- and upper-
        class senior citizens but also millions of future social security 
        beneficiaries: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the proposed increase in tax on social security benefits should not be 
enacted and if enacted should be repealed.

                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2016

a0922 

# Order

Clerk September 29, 2016

153242

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153242

COA: 322998

Midland CC: 13

- 005531

- FH

SHAWN KRISTI DICKEN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 12, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it appearing to this Court that the

cases of People v Steanhouse (Docket No. 152849) and People v Masroor (Docket Nos.

15294 6

- 8) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases

may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that

the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          86,078
<SECURITIES>                                   100,953
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,553
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,364)
<INVENTORY>                                     90,177
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               321,524
<PP&E>                                          58,468
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,872)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 757,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,329
<BONDS>                                         57,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    207,000
<COMMON>                                        68,984
<OTHER-SE>                                     262,903
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   757,717
<SALES>                                         60,219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,219
<CGS>                                           37,317
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,003
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,476)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       487
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,963)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,963)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)
        

</TABLE>
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

GOJET AIRLINES, LLC. 

(Windshield Ice) 

EIVED 

I ' 2 2010 

• j n Q DOCKET 

FAA Docket No. CP10CE0004 

DMSNo. FAA-2010-0190 

Judge: ALJ Richard C. Goodwin 

NOTICE OF DEPOSITION 

To: David Kessler, ESQ. 

FAA/Central Region 

Office of Regional Counsel 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, IVIissouri 64106-2641 

iz:> 

Please take notice that at 1:00 p.m. on June 11, 2010 at St. Louis Flight 

Standards District Office, 10801 Pear Tree Lane, Suite 200, St. Ann, Missouri 

Respondent's Counsel will take the oral deposition of Dean Adam, before a Notary 

Public or before some other officer authorized by law to administer oaths. Said 

deposition will be recorded by stenographic means and will continue until such time as it 

is complete. 

Dated submitted, : fYVavi o(5, ^DI D 

. , j IVED 

Tiitted,/ ^ r\ 

s lll^sq . 

JUf j » 2 2010 

HEARINa DOCKET 

David J. A. Hayes 

Vice President & General Counsel 

Trans States Holdings, Inc. 

11495 Navaid Road 

Bridgeton, Missouri 63044 

Phone: (314)222-4316 

Fax: (314)222-4311 

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT 

GOJET AIRLINES LLC 
^ 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I David J.A. Hayes, III, hereby certify that on May Jlg , 2010, I served the 

foregoing Notice of Deposition on the following parties' counsel or designated 

representative at the address indicated via facsimile & U.S. Mail, postage prepaid. 

Original & One Copy: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

One Copy: 

David B. Kessler 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Central Region, ACE-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

DOT Building 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, ALJ 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1998             OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0                 113,037
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0               1,304,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                  23,514
<INVENTORY>                                          0               3,571,384
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0               5,182,092
<PP&E>                                               0               4,659,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0               3,010,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0               7,002,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                  21,291
<OTHER-SE>                                           0               4,704,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0               7,002,089
<SALES>                                      2,302,369               7,201,616
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,302,369               7,201,616
<CGS>                                        1,465,639               4,682,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  519,130               1,583,633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,000                   9,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,120                  42,360
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                305,480                 892,664
<INCOME-TAX>                                   125,200                 366,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   180,280                 526,264
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08                     .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08                     .24
        

</TABLE>
#### Lewis LEEDS, Appellant, v. The TUITION PLAN, INC., a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-1050.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 29, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
House Calendar No. 142

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 393

[Report No. 103–447]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference

purposes.skill standards and certifications; and for otherand adoption of a voluntary national system ofeducation programs; to promote the developmenta framework for reauthorization of all Federalcational achievement for all students; to providecational opportunities and high levels of edusystemic changes needed to ensure equitable edupromote the research, consensus building, andtional framework for education reform; toprove learning and teaching by providing a nareport to accompany the bill (H.R. 1804) to imMARCH 21, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 142

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 393

[Report No. 103–447]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 1804) to improve learning and teaching by providing a national

framework for education reform; to promote the research, consensus

building, and systemic changes needed to ensure equitable educational

opportunities and high levels of educational achievement for all students;

to provide a framework for reauthorization of all Federal education

programs; to promote the development and adoption of a voluntary

national system of skill standards and certifications; and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 21, 1994

Mr. DERRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 1804) to improve learning and

teaching by providing a national framework for education

reform; to promote the research, consensus building, and

systemic changes needed to ensure equitable educational

opportunities and high levels of educational achievement

for all students; to provide a framework for reauthorization of all Federal education programs; to promote the
2

HRES 393 RH

development and adoption of a voluntary national system

of skill standards and certifications; and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 1804) to improve learning and

4 teaching by providing a national framework for education

5 reform; to promote the research, consensus building, and

6 systemic changes needed to ensure equitable educational

7 opportunities and high levels of educational achievement

8 for all students; to provide a framework for reauthoriza9 tion of all Federal education programs; to promote the de10 velopment and adoption of a voluntary national system of

11 skill standards and certifications; and for other purposes.

12 All points of order against the conference report and

13 against its consideration are waived. The conference re14 port shall be considered as read.
# C_2023035EN.01001201.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie — Poland) — X sp. z o.o. sp.k. v Z

(Case C-419/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2011/7/EU - Combating late payment in commercial transactions - Article 2(1) - Concept of ‘commercial transactions’ - Compensation for recovery costs incurred by the creditor due to late payment by the debtor - Article 6 - Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 - Several late payments for supplies of goods or services under a single contract)

(2023/C 35/13)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: X sp. z o.o. sp.k.

Defendant: Z

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 2(1) of Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions
  must be interpreted as meaning that:
  the concept of ‘commercial transactions’ referred to therein covers each successive delivery of goods or provision of services carried out under a single contract. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 2(1) of Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions

must be interpreted as meaning that:

the concept of ‘commercial transactions’ referred to therein covers each successive delivery of goods or provision of services carried out under a single contract.

| 2. | Article 6(1) of Directive 2011/7, read in conjunction with Article 4 of that directive,
  must be interpreted as meaning that:
  where a single contract provides for successive deliveries of goods or provision of services, each requiring payment within a specified period, the fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 by way of compensation for recovery costs is payable to the creditor for each late payment. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 6(1) of Directive 2011/7, read in conjunction with Article 4 of that directive,

must be interpreted as meaning that:

where a single contract provides for successive deliveries of goods or provision of services, each requiring payment within a specified period, the fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 by way of compensation for recovery costs is payable to the creditor for each late payment.

---

(1)  OJ C 490, 6.12.2021.

---