alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000940711
<NAME> FORT THOMAS FINANCIAL CORP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             388
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1397
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       1310
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            3503
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          78353
<ALLOWANCE>                                        366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   88013
<DEPOSITS>                                       63731
<SHORT-TERM>                                      3300
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                887
<LONG-TERM>                                       3454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                       15905
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   88013
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   6373
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  709
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  7082
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                3288
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3517
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3565
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      125
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   3028
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    792
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         517
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.46
<LOANS-NON>                                       1063
<LOANS-PAST>                                       117
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   239
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  366
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 394 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 394   

 To express the sense of the House that Congress has a constitutional 
obligation to conduct oversight of matters related to the operation of 
                            the Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 1994

   Mr. Gephardt (for himself and Mr. Michel) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was considered under suspension of the rules and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To express the sense of the House that Congress has a constitutional 
obligation to conduct oversight of matters related to the operation of 
                            the Government.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that:
            (a) Congress has a constitutional obligation to conduct 
        oversight of matters relating to the operations of the 
        Government, including matters related to any governmental 
        investigations which may, from time to time, be undertaken.
            (b) The Speaker, majority and minority leaders should meet 
        to determine the appropriate timetable, procedures, and forum 
        for appropriate congressional oversight, including hearings on 
        all matters related to ``Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan 
        Association (`MGS&L'), Whitewater Development Corporation and 
        Capital Management Services Inc. (`CMS')''.
            (c) No witness called to testify at these hearings shall be 
        granted immunity under sections 6002 and 6005 of title 18, 
        United States Code, over the objection of Special Counsel 
        Robert B. Fiske, Jr.
            (d) The hearings should be structured and sequenced in such 
        a manner that in the judgment of the leaders they would not 
        interfere with the ongoing investigation of Special Counsel 
        Robert B. Fiske, Jr.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.5



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Miramar Mining Corporation (the Company) on Form 40-F Amendment No. 1 for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony P. Walsh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



September 8, 2005

/s/ Anthony P. Walsh



Anthony P. Walsh

Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Miramar Mining Corporation and will be retained by Miramar Mining Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION
 
 The
undersigned, Thomas C. Shields, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Annual
Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
March 12, 2010
 By:
                    /s/
      Thomas C. ShieldsThomas
      C. ShieldsExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
 
 This
certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by
reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
by reference.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained by
ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
10.61




Third
Amendment
 to
 Employment
Agreement
 
 This
Third Amendment to Employment
Agreement(the “Third Amendment”), is being entered into effective
December 10, 2009 by and between ImageWare Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”) and Mr. Wayne Wetherell (the “Executive”).
 
 Whereas,
the Company and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of
September 27, 2005 and subsequently amended on September 27, 2008 and again on
April 6, 2009 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”);
 
 WHEREAS, the Executive
continues to perform valuable services for the Company and the Company desires
to assure itself of the continuing services of Executive; and
 
 WHEREAS, in consideration of
the foregoing and in order to amend the terms of the Agreement and to provide
for the continued services of the Executive in accordance with the present
intent of the Company and the Executive.
 
 NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration,
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in further consideration of the
mutual covenants contained in the Employment Agreement, the parties do hereby
agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
 
 1.
              Section“2.Term
      of Agreement”strike the
      language “continue until December 31, 2009” and replace it with “continue
      until December 31, 2010”.
 
 
 2.
              Except
      as expressly amended herein, the Employment Agreement shall continue and
      be in full force in all respects.
 
 
  _________________________________                                            _________________________________
 
 ImageWare
Systems,
Inc.                                                                           Wayne
Wetherell
# August 2020
Robert H. Baldwin
   President                B E L L A G I O


June 29, 1999


Mr. Stephen A. Wynn
Chairman of the Board and
 Chief Executive Officer
Mirage Resorts, Incorporated
3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South
Las Vegas, Nevada  89109

  Re:  Amendment No. 3 to Fine Art Rental Agreement

Dear Steve:

This letter  confirms our  agreement that, effective this date, Bellagio
will sell to you, and you will purchase from Bellagio,  the work of fine
art  entitled  "Portrait  of  Dora  Maar" by Pablo Picasso (1942, oil on
panel, 36-1/2 x 28-3/4 inches) (the "Work")  for the  purchase price  of
$10,000,000 in cash.    Pursuant  to Paragraph 3 of the letter agreement
dated   December   31,  1998  between  Bellagio  and  you  (the  "Rental
Agreement"),  this letter further confirms our agreement that, effective
this date, the Work shall be added to Exhibit A to the  Rental Agreement
for the monthly rent of $24,042.

Please  sign  below  to  confirm  your  agreement  to the foregoing.  My
signature below confirms Bellagio's agreement thereto.

Very truly yours,

BELLAGIO



By: ROBERT H. BALDWIN
    -------------------------------------
    ROBERT H. BALDWIN
    President and Chief Executive Officer

I hereby agree to the foregoing.

    STEPHEN A. WYNN
    -------------------------------------
    STEPHEN A. WYNN

cc: Bruce A. Levin
    Peter C. Walsh
    James E. Pettis
    George J. Panek

                 P.O. BOX 7700, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89177-7700

                             EXHIBIT 10.4
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARTHUR SARKISSIAN,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 13-70121

Tax Ct. No. 27511-11

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from a Decision of the

United States Tax Court

Submitted May 13, 2015** 

Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Arthur Sarkissian appeals from the Tax Court’s order dismissing his action

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. 

§ 7482(a)(1). We review for clear error the Tax Court’s factual findings, Williams

v. Comm’r, 935 F.2d 1066, 1068 (9th Cir. 1991), and we affirm. 

FILED

MAY 26 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Tax Court did not clearly err in finding that Sarkissian actually received

the notice of deficiency. See Erhard v. Comm’r, 87 F.3d 273, 274 (9th Cir. 1996)

(notice of deficiency is valid if “the taxpayer actually receives the notice,

regardless of where the IRS mails the notice”); see also Sparkman v. Comm’r, 509

F.3d 1149, 1156 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[T]he Tax Court . . . may disregard

uncontradicted testimony by a taxpayer where it finds that testimony lacking in

credibility.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

We reject Sarkissian’s arguments concerning due process and the IRS’s

alleged intentional failure to send notices to Sarkissian’s tax preparer and attorney. 

AFFIRMED.

2 13-70121
#### H. F. ALLISON, Petitioner, v. MID-FLA. HAULING, INC., etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 42383.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 19, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 260 So.2d 293.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 348

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses

of investigations and studies by the Committee on Foreign Affairs in

the second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 7, 1994

Mr. HAMILTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House

for expenses of investigations and studies by the Committee on Foreign Affairs in the second session of the One

Hundred Third Congress.

1 Resolved, That for expenses of investigations and

2 studies by the Committee on Foreign Affairs (hereinafter

3 in the resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), there

4 shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House not

5 more than $4,145,214.

6 SEC. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made

7 on vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the
2

HRES 348 IH

1 chairman of the Committee, and approved by the Commit2 tee on House Administration.

3 SEC. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolu4 tion for investigations and studies carried out during the

5 period beginning at noon on January 3, 1994, and ending

6 immediately before noon on January 3, 1995.

7 SEC. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution

8 shall be expended in accordance with regulations pre9 scribed by the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
#### Alfreda BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Betty Brown CHILES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. P-83, 84.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 16, 1971.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.

*229Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgments of the lower court appealed from herein are affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
Order entered September 17, 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00194

- CR

EDWARD LAMAR PORTER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 28 3rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18

- 00712

- T



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 13, 2019 first motion for extension of time to

file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief due on or before Oc tober 7, 2019

.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### SPERRY RAND CORP. and James F. Pigott, d/b/a Manufacturers Wholesale Warehouse Service v. CITY OF JACKSON, Mississippi.

No. 46370.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 8, 1971.

Overstreet & Kuykendall, Young, Young & Scanlon, Jackson, for appellant.

John E. Stone, Watkins, Pyle, Ludlam, Winter & Stennis, Jackson, for appellee.

SMITH, Justice:

ON MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AMICUS CURIAE

On February 25, 1971, without an opinion, an order was entered per curiam overruling a motion of the City of Jackson to docket and dismiss the appeal of Sperry Rand Corporation and James F. Pigott, d/b/a Manufacturers Wholesale Warehouse Service.

In overruling the motion, this Court considered the language actually employed in the statute to be controlling. The statute (Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated section 3374-08) grants the right of appeal “to any person interested in or aggrieved by the decree of the chancellor, and who was a party to the proceedings in the chancery court. * * * ” The right is not limited to those parties.who actively participated in the proceedings in that court. The interpolation of “who participated” or “who appeared” or words of similar restrictive import, was not considered to be justified. *575To fulfill the requirements of due process, the statute provides for publication of notice to all owners of property within the area proposed to be annexed. The statutory notice having been given, appellants and others within that classification, became “parties to the proceedings” in the chancery court. This status continued through final decree, which became conclusive and binding upon appellants and will so remain until and unless reversed or modified on appeal.

Their property rights having been adjudicated and the decree being res judicata as to them, appellants have perfected an appeal to this Court within the time and in the manner permitted by statute. This appeal they are entitled to prosecute. As in other cases of appeal, it will be limited to the record as made. No inference of any kind whatever is to be drawn from this ruling as to what limitations, if any, there may or may not be as to grounds for reversal available for assignment by appellants.

Motions on file by other parties for leave to appear and file briefs as amicus curiae are denied.

RODGERS, JONES, BRADY and IN-ZER, JJ., concur.

PATTERSON, J., GILLESPIE, P. J., and ROBERTSON, J., dissent.

ETHRIDGE, C. J., took no part.

PATTERSON, Justice

(dissenting):

I dissent from that portion of this opinion which permits the appeal of Sperry Rand Corporation and James F. Pigott, d/b/a Manufacturers Wholesale Warehouse Service, since I do not believe this is in accord with the legislative intent expressed in Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated section 3374-08 (1956).

GILLESPIE, P. J., and ROBERTSON, J., concur in this dissent.
1927:3

-d - COLA C'Y Cleft: o. Stott.:of IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23-0181 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SANDRA LYNNE JONES, Defendant and Appellant. GRANT Pursuant

to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant

is given anextension

of time until June 26, 2023, to prepare, file, and servethe Appellant's opening brief.05/19/2023Case Number: DA 23-0181
#### Donald E. SPARKS v. L. L. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 38984.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                   EXHIBIT 11

                        Golden West Financial Corporation
        Statement of Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
                 (Dollars in thousands except per share figures)



                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                      March 31
                                                             ---------------------------
                                                                1999           1998
                                                             ------------   ------------

<S>                                                            <C>            <C>      
Earnings Before Extraordinary Item                             $ 120,368      $ 110,081
Extraordinary Item, Net of Tax                                       -0-         (7,710)
                                                             ------------   ------------
Net Earnings                                                   $ 120,368      $ 102,371
                                                             ============   ============

Weighted Average Shares                                       56,580,974     57,126,696
    Add:  Options outstanding at period end                    1,628,905      2,374,600
    Less:  Shares assumed purchased back with
              proceeds of options exercised                    1,063,900      1,492,456
                                                             ------------   ------------
Diluted Average Shares Outstanding                            57,145,979     58,008,840
                                                             ============   ============

Basic Earnings Per Share Calculation:
  Basic Earnings Per Share Before Extraordinary Item           $    2.13      $    1.92
  Extraordinary Item, Net of Tax                                    0.00           (.13)
                                                             ------------   ------------
  Basic Earnings Per Share                                     $    2.13      $    1.79
                                                             ============   ============

Diluted Earnings Per Share Calculation:
  Diluted Earnings Per Share Before Extraordinary Item         $    2.11      $    1.89
  Extraordinary Item, Net of Tax                                    0.00           (.13)
                                                             ------------   ------------
  Diluted Earnings Per Share                                   $    2.11      $    1.76
                                                             ============   ============
</TABLE>