FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC U IT JULY 2, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H]

I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 15654 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 7 - 0 0 0 4 4 - CR- FTM - 2 9 SPC U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s C U A H T E M O C C A R B A J A L - L O P E Z , a .k .a . C u au h te m o c C a rb a ja l L o p e z , a .k .a . C a rb a

ja l L . C u au h te m o c , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( Ju l y 2, 2008) B efo re A N D E R S O N , H U L L an d W IL S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M:2

C uaht em oc C arbaj al -L op ez appeal s hi s 57-m on th sent ence i m po se d for re entryi nt o the U ni t ed S t at es af t erdepo rt at i on . O n app ea l , C arbaj al -L op ez ar gu es th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u r t im p o s e d a n u n r e a s o n ab le s e n te n c e b e c au s e it ( 1 ) f a ile d to a de qua t e l y c ons i de rhi s m i t i ga t i on e vi de nc e , ( 2) di d notgi ve s pe c i f i c r e a s ons f

or th e s e n te n c e im p o s e d , a n d ( 3 ) f o c u s e d to o h e a v ily o n th e o f f e n s e o f c o n v ic tio n . Fo rth e r e a s o n s s e tf

o r th b e l o w , w e a f

f i rm. O urr e vi e w of

the f i na l s e nt e nc e i m pos e d by the di s tr i c tc our ti s f or r e a s o n ab le n e s s . U

ni te d State s v . A gbai , 49 7 F . 3d 12 26 , 12 29 (11th C i r. 20 07 ) ( per c ur i a m ) . T he S upr e m e C our tha s e xpl a i ne d tha tthe r e a s onabl e ne s s s t a nda r d m e a ns r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n . G al l

v. U ni ted Stat es , 1 2 8 S. Ct . 5 8 6 , 5 9 7 , 1 6 9 L. E d. 2d 44 5 (20 07 ). T he di s tr i c tc our tm us ti m pos e as e nt e nc e tha ti s both pr oc e dur a l l y a nd s u b s ta n tiv e ly r e a s o n ab le . Id . A s e nt e nc e i s pr oc e dur a l l y unr e a s onabl e i f the di s tr i c tc our ti m pr ope r l y c a l c ul a t e d the gui de l i ne i m pr i s onm e ntr a nge , tr e a t e d the G ui del i nes a s m andat ory, fa i l ed t o con si der the approp ri at e s t atut ory f ac t ors, base d th e s e n te n c e o n c le a r ly e rr o n e o u s f a c ts , o rf a ile d to a d e q u a te ly e x p la in its r e a s o n in g . I

d. I f the di s tr i c tc our tm a de no pr oc e dur a l e rr or s , the n the s ubs t a nt i ve r e a s o n ab le n e s s o f

th e s e n te n c e is r e v ie w e d to d e te rm in e w h e th e rth e s e n te n c e is s u p p o r te d b y th e 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) f a c to r s . I d. a t 6 0 0 .3

T h e § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) f

a c to r s in c lu d e : (1) the nature a nd ci rc um st ance s of the offens e a nd the hi st ory a nd c ha r a c t e r i s t i c s of

the de f e nda nt ; ( 2) the ne e d t o r e f l e c tthe s e r i ous ne s s of

the of f e ns e , t o pr om ot e r e s pe c tf orthe l a w , a nd t o pr ovi de j us tpuni s hm e ntf orthe of f e ns e ; ( 3) the ne e d f

or d e te rr e n c e ; ( 4 ) th e n e e d to p r o te c t th e p u b lic ; ( 5 ) th e n e e d to prov i de the defendantw i th n ee ded edu ca t i on al or vo ca t i on al tra i ni ng or m edi ca l ca re ; (6) the ki nd s of s ent ence s a vai l abl e; (7) the S ent enci ng G ui del i nes r ange; (8) pert i nentpo l i cy s ta te m e n ts o f

th e S e n te n c in g C o m m is s io n ; ( 9 ) th e n e e d to a v o id unw a nt e d s e nt e nc i ng di s pa r i t i e s ; a nd ( 10) the ne e d t o pr ovi de r e s titu tio n to v ic tim s . U ni ted Stat es v. T

al ley , 431 F . 3d 784, 786 ( 11th C i r . 2005) ( pe rc ur i a m ) . W he n a di stri ctcourtse nt ence s adefe nd antw i thi n the gu i del i nes r ange, on l y abri ef di s c us s i on of

the r e a s ons f

orthe s e nt e nc e i s r e qui r e d a nd the di s tr i c tc our tne e d not e x p lic itly a d d r e s s e a c h o f th e s e n te n c in g f

a c to r s . Se e U

n ite d S ta te s v . Sc o tt , 426 F . 3d 1324, 1329 ( 11th C i r . 2005) ( hol di ng tha tnothi ng i n B oo ke rr e qui r e s tha tthe di s tr i c tc our ts t a t e i tha s e xpl i c i t l y c ons i de r e d e a c h § 3553( a ) f a c t or ) . “ [ W ] he n the d i s tr i c tc o u r ti m p o s e s as e n t e n c e wi th i n th e a d v i s o ry Gu i d e l i n e s r a n g e , we ordi nari l y w i l l expectthatchoi ce t o b e are as on abl e one. ” T al ley , 4 3 1 F .3 d a t 7 8 8 . T h e d is tr ic t c o u r t d id n o t im p o s e a n u n r e a s o n ab le s e n te n c e b e c au s e it c orr e c t l y appl i e d the gui de l i ne s a nd a de qua t e l y c ons i de r e d a l l the s e nt e nc i ng fa ct ors i n i m po si ng a w i thi n-gu i del i nes s ent ence . A cc ordi ng l y, w e a ff i rm C arbaj al -L op ez ’ s s ent ence .4

AF F I RME D.