Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2019
                              Larry Couture, M.D., DAB CR5283 (2019)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Larry Couture, M.D., DAB CR5283 (2019)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Larry Couture, M.D.,
	(PTANs:  00A638433; ZZZ03602Z; CA137965),
	(NPIs:  1649295676; 1679582258),
	Petitioner,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-16-861Decision No. CR5283March 29, 2019

        
              
    

      DECISION
Petitioner, Larry Couture, M.D., is a California physician and the owner of two medical practice groups, Larry H Couture MD Inc. and Couture Medical Group Inc.  He and his practice groups participated in the Medicare program until May 8, 2016, when the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) revoked their enrollments, citing 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(12).  CMS took this action because, in its view, the California Medicaid Agency effectively terminated Petitioner Couture’s Medicaid (referred to as Medi-Cal) enrollment when, effective May 11, 2015, it deactivated his provider number.  Although Petitioner Couture initially (partially) appealed, he withdrew the appeal on June 17, 2015.
Petitioner now appeals his Medicare revocation.
I find that, pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(12), CMS appropriately revoked the Medicare enrollments of Petitioner Couture and his practice groups because the California Medicaid Agency terminated his Medicaid participation, and the state’s action is final.  I therefore affirm CMS’s determination.
Page 2
Background
In revocation notices, dated April 8, 2016, the Medicare contractor, Noridian Healthcare Solutions, revoked the Medicare enrollments of Petitioner Couture, Larry H Couture MD Inc., and Couture Medical Group Inc.  As the notice letters explain, the contractor acted pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(12) because the California Medicaid Agency had terminated Petitioner’s Medi-Cal participation, and his appeal rights had been exhausted.  CMS Ex. 1 at 14-19.
Petitioner requested further review.  CMS Ex. 1 at 1.  In a reconsidered determination, dated July 12, 2016, the contractor acknowledged that Petitioner Couture was allowed to participate in the Medi-Cal program through a managed care plan, but affirmed the revocation because Petitioner was barred from the Medi-Cal program as a fee-for-service provider.  CMS Ex. 3.
Petitioner appealed, and the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment.
**Exhibits**. With its pre-hearing brief and motion for summary judgment (CMS Br.), CMS filed three exhibits (CMS Exs. 1-3).  With his pre-hearing brief, opposition to CMS’s motion, and cross-motion for summary judgment (P. Br.), Petitioner filed fifteen exhibits.  (P. Exs. 1-15).  CMS replied to Petitioner’s cross-motion (CMS Reply), and Petitioner filed a sur-reply (P. Sur-reply).
In the absence of any objections, I admit into evidence CMS Exs. 1-3 and P. Exs. 1-15.
**Summary Judgment**.  Although the parties have moved for summary judgment, I find that this matter may be decided on the written record, without considering whether the standards for summary judgment are satisfied.  In my initial order, I instructed each party to submit the written direct testimony of any proposed witnesses and, if it wished to cross-examine an opposing witness, to state so affirmatively.  Acknowledgment and Pre-hearing Order at 5 (¶¶ 8, 9) (September 9, 2016).  CMS has no witnesses.  Petitioner lists three witnesses and submits their written declarations, but CMS does not ask to cross-examine any of them.  An in-person hearing would therefore serve no purpose, and I may decide this case based on the written record.  *See* Acknowledgment at 5 (¶ 10).
Discussion
***Pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(12), CMS properly revoked Petitioner Couture’s Medicare enrollment and that of his practice groups because the California State Medicaid agency terminated their Medicaid billing privileges, and the state agency’s actions are final***.1
Page 3
**Statute and regulations**.  CMS regulates the Medicare enrollment of providers and suppliers.  Social Security Act (Act) § 1866(j)(1)(A).  It may revoke a supplier’s enrollment in the Medicare program if a state Medicaid agency has terminated his Medicaid billing privileges, and he has exhausted all applicable appeal rights.  42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(12).  So long as I find that these two criteria are met, I must sustain the revocation.  *Douglas Bradley, M.D.*, DAB No. 2663 at 6-7, 16 (2015); *Letantia Bussell, M.D.*, DAB No. 2196 at 13 (2008).
**Termination of Petitioner’s Medicaid billing privileges**.  Petitioner Couture apparently formed a third practice group, Parkview Medical Group.  On behalf of that group, he applied for Medi-Cal enrollment.
In a letter dated April 21, 2015, the California Medicaid Agency (California Department of Health Care Services) advised Petitioner that it was deactivating his and his practice’s Medi-Cal provider numbers (NPI 1649295676; NPI 1679582258) effective 20 days from the date of the letter (i.e., effective May 11, 2015).  CMS Ex. 1 at 22.  The Medi-Cal agency took this action because, in his Parkview application, Petitioner Couture did not disclose disciplinary actions taken against his medical license.  CMS Ex. 1 at 21.
Petitioner appealed Parkview’s denial of enrollment, but apparently did not appeal his own deactivation.  In any event, on June 17, 2015, he withdrew the Parkview appeal.  Petitioner thus exhausted his state appeal rights.  CMS Ex. 1 at 26; CMS Ex. 2.
Notwithstanding the plain language of the state’s notice letter and his exhaustion of his state appeal rights, Petitioner maintains that CMS wrongfully revoked his Medicare enrollment and that of his medical practice groups.  Petitioner concedes that the state agency “deactivated” his fee-for-service enrollment in the Medi-Cal program because he failed to disclose, in his medical group’s application, an earlier reprimand involving his medical license.  However, the state agency has allowed him to participate in the Medi-Cal program as a network provider for a Medi-Cal managed care plan, which, in Petitioner’s view, means that his Medicaid billing privileges were neither terminated nor revoked.
I disagree.  I find that CMS had the authority to revoke Petitioner’s Medicare enrollment (and that of his medical practice groups) because his Medi-Cal billing privileges were terminated.  In reaching this conclusion, I focus on the “nature and effect” of the state’s action and consider whether that action “is consistent with – and likely necessary to achieve – section 424.535(a)(12)’s purpose, which is to coordinate the effort of federally-financed healthcare programs to protect their fiscal integrity and beneficiaries.”  *Douglas Bradley*, DAB No. 2663 at 7.
Here, the California Medicaid Agency denied Petitioner the opportunity to bill the Medi-Cal program because he failed to disclose a disciplinary action involving his medical
Page 4
license.  As the Secretary of Health and Human Service has recognized, this type of omission establishes that a provider/supplier poses a threat to the program’s fiscal integrity.  42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(4) (allowing CMS to revoke Medicare enrollment based on false or misleading information on an enrollment application); 42 C.F.R. §§ 424.535(a)(9) and 424.516(d)(ii) (allowing CMS to revoke Medicare enrollment based on failing to report an adverse legal action).  Thus, the state agency’s termination of Petitioner’s billing privileges and CMS’s revocation of his Medicare enrollment coordinate to protect the fiscal integrity of both programs.
That the state agency allowed Petitioner to participate in Medi-Cal through a managed care organization does not change the potential threat he poses to the fiscal integrity of federally-financed healthcare programs.  Managed care organizations accept a set payment per member per month.  The provider or supplier of the services is removed from the billing, posing less-to-no risk to the program.
No one disputes that the state agency terminated Petitioner’s billing privileges and that its action is final.  That the state agency allowed him limited participation in the Medi-Cal program – participation that does not threaten its financial integrity – does not alter the fact that his fee-for-service enrollment was terminated, which gave CMS the authority to revoke his Medicare enrollment.
Conclusion
I affirm CMS’s determination.  I find that CMS may revoke Petitioner Couture’s Medicare enrollment because the California Medicaid Agency terminated his fee-for-service participation in the program, and that action is final.  CMS may therefore revoke his Medicare enrollment pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(12).


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law to support my decision. back to note 1 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back