Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2020
                              Sullivan County Auditor, DAB CR5648 (2020)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Sullivan County Auditor, DAB CR5648 (2020)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Sullivan County Auditor,
	(PTAN: 781430),
	Petitioner,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-18-337Decision No. CR5648July 7, 2020

        
              
    

      DECISION
Petitioner, Sullivan County Auditor, operates the Sullivan County Ambulance Service in Sullivan County, Indiana.  The ambulance service participates in the Medicare program as a supplier of services.  After its Medicare billing privileges were deactivated, it applied to reenroll in the program.  The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) granted the application, effective June 16, 2017, resulting in a two-week coverage lapse.  Petitioner now challenges that effective date and asks that the lapse in coverage be eliminated.
Because Petitioner filed its subsequently-approved reenrollment application on June 16, 2017, June 16 is the earliest possible effective date for its reactivation.  *Howard M. Sokoloff, DPM, MS, Inc.*, DAB No. 2972 (2019); *Urology Grp. of NJ, LLC*, DAB No. 2860 (2018); *Willie Goffney, Jr., M.D.*, DAB No. 2763 at 7 (2017), *aff’d* *Goffney v. Azar*, No. CV 17-8032 MRW (C.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 2019).
Background
In a notice dated August 10, 2017, the Medicare contractor, Wisconsin Physicians Service, advised Petitioner that it approved the supplier’s revalidated Medicare
Page 2
enrollment with a lapse in coverage from June 2 through 15, 2017.  CMS Ex. 7 at 1.  Petitioner requested reconsideration.  *See* CMS Ex. 8.
In a reconsidered determination dated October 16, 2017, the contractor affirmed the effective date and the coverage lapse.  CMS Ex. 8.  Petitioner appealed.
CMS moves for summary judgment.  However, because neither party proposes any witnesses, an in-person hearing would serve no purpose.  *See* Acknowledgment and Pre‐hearing Order at 3, 5 (¶¶ 4, 10) (December 21, 2017).  I may therefore decide this case based on the written record, without considering whether the standards for summary judgment are satisfied.
CMS submits its motion and brief (CMS Br.) with eight exhibits (CMS Exs. 1-8).  Petitioner submits its written response and an additional copy of its hearing request with attached documents, which are not marked as exhibits.  In the absence of any objections, I admit into evidence CMS Exs. 1-8.  *See* Acknowledgment and Pre-hearing Order at 5 (¶ 7).  I decline to sort out Petitioner’s documents, although I have reviewed them.  Some duplicate CMS’s exhibits, and the rest address the deactivation, which, as discussed below, I have no authority to review.
Discussion
***Petitioner filed its subsequently-approved enrollment application on June 16, 2017, and its Medicare reactivation enrollment can be no earlier than that date.  42 C.F.R. § 424.520(d).***1
**Enrollment**.  Petitioner participates in the Medicare program as a “supplier” of services.  Social Security Act § 1861(d); 42 C.F.R. § 498.2.  To receive Medicare payments for the services furnished to program beneficiaries, a supplier must enroll in the program.  42 C.F.R. § 424.505.  “Enrollment” is the process by which CMS and its contractors: 1) identify the prospective supplier; 2) validate the supplier’s eligibility to provide items or services to Medicare beneficiaries; 3) identify and confirm a supplier’s owners and practice location; and 4) grant the supplier Medicare billing privileges.  42 C.F.R. § 424.502.
To enroll, a prospective supplier must complete and submit an enrollment application.  42 C.F.R. §§ 424.510(d)(1), 424.515(a).  An enrollment application is either a CMS‐approved paper application or an electronic process approved by the Office of
Page 3
Management and Budget.  42 C.F.R. § 424.502.2
  When CMS determines that a prospective supplier meets the applicable enrollment requirements, it grants Medicare billing privileges, which means that the supplier can submit claims and receive payments from Medicare for covered services provided to program beneficiaries.  For ambulance suppliers, the effective date for billing privileges “is the *later*of the date of filing” a subsequently-approved enrollment application or “the date that the supplier first began furnishing services at a new practice location.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.520(d) (emphasis added).
**Revalidation and deactivation**.  To maintain its billing privileges, a supplier must, at least every five years, resubmit and recertify the accuracy of its enrollment information, a process referred to as “revalidation.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.515.  In addition to periodic revalidations, CMS may, at other times and for its own reasons, ask a supplier to recertify the accuracy of its enrollment information.  42 C.F.R. § 424.515(d)-(e).  Within 60 days of receiving CMS’s notice to recertify, the supplier must submit an appropriate enrollment application with complete and accurate information and supporting documentation.  42 C.F.R. § 424.515(a)(2).
If, within 90 days from receipt of CMS’s notice, the supplier does not furnish complete and accurate information and all supporting documentation, or does not resubmit and certify the accuracy of its enrollment information, CMS may deactivate its billing privileges, and no Medicare payments will be made.  42 C.F.R. §§ 424.540(a)(3), 424.555(b).  To reactivate its billing privileges, the supplier must complete and submit a new enrollment application.  42 C.F.R. § 424.540(b)(1).  It is settled that, following deactivation, section 424.520(d) governs the effective date of reenrollment.  *Sokoloff*, DAB No. 2972 at 6-7; *Urology Grp.*, DAB No. 2860 at 7; *Goffney*, DAB No. 2763 at 7.
I have no authority to review a deactivation.  *Sokoloff*, DAB No. 2972 at 6; *Ark. Health Grp.*, DAB No. 2929 at 7-9 (2019).
**Petitioner’s deactivation and reenrollment**.  In a notice letter, dated February 7, 2017, the contractor directed Petitioner to revalidate its Medicare enrollment by updating or confirming the information in its record.  The letter directed Petitioner to the PECOS website and explained that a supplier could revalidate through the PECOS system or by mailing to the contractor a completed CMS-855 Medicare enrollment application.  The letter warned that Petitioner had to revalidate by April 30, 2017, or risk losing its Medicare billing privileges; the letter explained that, during the period of deactivation, Medicare would not pay for the services rendered.  CMS Ex. 1.
Page 4
On May 1, 2017, via PECOS, Petitioner submitted its reenrollment application.  CMS Ex. 2 at 1.
In a letter, dated May 2, 2017, the contractor acknowledged that it received Petitioner’s enrollment application, but the application did not include some required documentation (vehicle registrations and a letter certifying that the county was legally and financially responsible for Medicare payments).  The letter warned that, if Petitioner failed to submit the requested information within 30 days, its application would be rejected.  CMS Ex. 3.
Petitioner responded on May 31, 2017, providing the vehicle registration materials.  CMS Ex. 4 at 8-10.  It did not provide certification of the county’s responsibilities.  CMS Ex. 4.
By letter, dated June 7, 2017, the contractor advised Petitioner that its Medicare billing privileges were stopped, effective June 2, 2017, because the ambulance service did not revalidate its enrollment application and did not respond to the contractor’s request for more information.  The letter directed Petitioner to submit a new Medicare enrollment application that included the missing information.  CMS Ex. 5.
Petitioner maintains that it did not receive the contractor’s May 2 development letter until May 31, and that it responded within 30 days of that date, so it should not have been deactivated.  Petitioner’s Response.  Regardless of the merits of Petitioner’s argument, I have no authority to review a deactivation.  *Ark. Health Grp.*, DAB No. 2929 at 7-9 and cases cited therein.3
On *June 16, 2017*, Petitioner filed, via PECOS, a new application that included the previously missing certification of responsibility.  CMS Ex. 6.4
  In a letter dated August 10, 2017, the contractor approved the revalidated application, with a lapse in coverage from June 2 through 15, 2017.  CMS Ex. 7.  Thus, pursuant to section 424.520(d), the date Petitioner filed its subsequently-approved enrollment application – June 16, 2017 – is the correct effective date of enrollment.  *Sokoloff*, DAB No. 2972 at 6-7; *Urology Grp*.*,* DAB No. 2860 at 7-9; *Goffney*, DAB No. 2763 at 7.
I have no authority to grant Petitioner an earlier effective date based on any equitable or policy arguments.  *Sokoloff*, DAB No. 2972 at 9.
Page 5
Conclusion
Because Petitioner filed its subsequently-approved reenrollment application on June 16, 2017, CMS properly granted its Medicare reenrollment effective that date.


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law. back to note 1
                      2. CMS’s electronic process is referred to as PECOS (Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System). back to note 2
                      3. CMS makes a compelling argument that Petitioner, in fact, timely received the May 2 notice, but the issue is irrelevant because I have no authority to review the deactivation. back to note 3
                      4. CMS did not submit a copy of the June 16 application; however, Petitioner does not dispute that it filed a reenrollment application on that date. back to note 4 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back