alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                                                           5 

        
<S>                                                   <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   12-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1995 
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-01-1995 
<PERIOD-END>                                              DEC-31-1995 
<CASH>                                                         97,997 
<SECURITIES>                                                  128,445 
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              226,442 
<PP&E>                                                          2,974 
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 22,663 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                229,416 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,585,552 
<BONDS>                                                             0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                                         0 
<COMMON>                                                       13,427
<OTHER-SE>                                                  8,363,766 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               (1,356,136) 
<SALES>                                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    0 
<CGS>                                                               0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0 
<CHANGES>                                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                        0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   (0.02) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0 

         

</TABLE>
Third Department,

March, 1997

(March 4, 1997)

#### In the Matter of Joel M. Proyect, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

[658 NYS2d 460]

Per Curiam.

Respondent was suspended for five years by this Court, effective May 15, 1993 *(Matter of Proyect,*192 AD2d 868). He now seeks reinstatement to practice prior to expiration of the five-year period. Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, opposes the application.

In 1992, respondent pleaded guilty to the Federal felony of manufacturing (i.e., growing) marihuana, a crime classified as serious under Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (d). He was sentenced to five years in prison and four years of supervised release upon his release from prison. In arguing for early consideration of an application for reinstatement, respondent states that his family has been economically devastated by his sentence and suspension, that he was a model prisoner, that he was granted early and full release from Federal custody in November 1996 (although he remains under Federal probation supervision), that he has not consumed any controlled or addicting substances (i.e., drugs or alcohol) for three and a half years, and that he is successfully employed by a Manhattan wholesale merchandise distributor.

The rules of this Court state that an attorney may apply for reinstatement upon expiration of the period of suspension (22 NYCRR 806.12 [a]). We therefore decline to consider respondent’s reinstatement application at this time. However, in view of the above circumstances, we grant respondent permission to *641submit an application for reinstatement as early as January 1998. In addition to the usual proofs *(see,*22 NYCRR 806.9, 806.12) , any reinstatement application submitted by respondent must also contain proof of his compliance with the attorney registration statute and rules, documentation of his full release from Federal custody, a copy of his agreement to participate in the Lawyer Assistance Program of the New York State Bar Association, a report from his probation officer, and the results of a psychiatric examination.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s petition be and hereby is granted only to the extent of permitting respondent to submit an application for reinstatement in January 1998, in accordance with the terms of this decision and the procedures set forth in this Court’s rule on reinstatement (22 NYCRR 806.12) , and the petition be and hereby is otherwise denied.
#### Larry ATKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-233.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 25, 1972.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty of robbery by a jury, adjudicated guilty, and sentenced. On this appeal he urges two points. The first is that he should be discharged because *his*trial was not held within the time prescribed by Rule 3.191, R.Cr.P., 33 F.S.A. We hold that this point does not present grounds for appellant’s discharge because he twice received continuance of trial; the first continuance was achieved by stipulation to substitute counsel, while the second continuance was received by withdrawing waiver of jury trial on the date set for non-jury trial. See Rule 3.191(f), R.Cr.P., F.S.A., and State ex rel. Butler v. Cullen, Fla.1971, 253 So.2d 861.

Appellant’s second point urges error upon the denial of his motion for a mistrial. It does not present reversible error for the reasons stated in Cornelius v. State, Fla.1950, 49 So.2d 332, and Richardson v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 530. See also Cox v. State, Fla.App.1969, 219 So.2d 762.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 21

                                SUBSIDIARIES

  1.   PSINet Pipeline New York, Inc. (formerly known as The Pipeline Network
       Inc.), a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York.

  2.   InterCon Systems Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of
       the State of Delaware.

  3.   EUnet GB Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of the United
       Kingdom.

  4.   PSINet U.K. Limited (formerly Performance Systems International
       Limited), a corporation organized under the laws of the United Kingdom.

  5.   PSINet Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of Canada.

  6.   PSINet Japan Inc. (PSI Japan, Kabushiki Kaisha), a corporation organized
       under the laws of Japan.

  7.   PSINet Pipeline USA, Inc. a corporation organized under the laws of the
       State of Delaware.

  8.   PSI Pipeline Holdings, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of
       the State of Delaware.

  9.   PSINet Holdings, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the
       State of Delaware.

  10.  InterPak, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of
       Delaware.

  11.  PSINet Publishing Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of
       the State of Delaware.

  12.  PSINet Security Services Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of
       the State of Delaware.

  13.  PSINet Pipeline U.K. Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of
       the United Kingdom.

  14.  PSINet Ireland Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of the
       Republic of Ireland.

  15.  PSINet Europe Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of the
       Republic of Ireland.

  16.  PSINet Europe Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State
       of Delaware.

  17.  PSINet Telecom Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of the
       State of Delaware.
# C_2022024EN.01000901.xml

| 17.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court — Ireland) — European arrest warrants issued in respect of SN, SD

(Case C-479/21 PPU) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Article 50 TEU - Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community - Article 217 TFEU - Trade and Cooperation Agreement with the United Kingdom - Protocol (No 21) on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European arrest warrant - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - Continuation under the Withdrawal Agreement, on a transitional basis, of the European arrest warrant regime in respect of the United Kingdom - Application to a European arrest warrant of provisions relating to the surrender mechanism established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement with the United Kingdom - Regimes binding on Ireland)

(2022/C 24/11)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Supreme Court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: SN, SD

Intervening parties: Governor of Cloverhill Prison, Ireland, Attorney General, Governor of Mountjoy prison

Operative part of the judgment

Article 50 TEU, Article 217 TFEU and Protocol (No 21) on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, annexed to the TEU and the TFEU, must be interpreted as meaning that Article 62(1)(b) of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, read in conjunction with the fourth paragraph of Article 185 thereof, and Article 632 of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, are binding on Ireland.

---

(1)  OJ C 391, 27.9.2021.

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Pasquale A. Ambrogio, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the second quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (“Quarterly Report”) of GIANT GROUP, LTD.(“Company” or “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this Quarterly Report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for the periods presented in thisQuarterly Report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I amresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Company is made known to us during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period ended of June 30, 2004 covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theCompany’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Company’s independent auditor and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting.
House Calendar No. 178

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 466

[Report No. 103–564]

RESOLUTION

Waiving certain points of order against the bill

poses.ending September 30, 1995, and for other purthe revenues of said District for the fiscal yearactivities chargeable in whole or in part againsternment of the District of Columbia and other(H.R. 4649) making appropriations for the govJUNE 28, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 178

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 466

[Report No. 103–564]

Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 4649) making appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and other

activities chargeable in whole or in part against the revenues of said

District for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 28, 1994

Mr. GORDON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 4649)

making appropriations for the government of the District

of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole

or in part against the revenues of said District for the

fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other

purposes.

1 Resolved, That all points of order against consider2 ation of the bill (H.R. 4649) making appropriations for

3 the government of the District of Columbia and other ac-
2

HRES 466 RH

1 tivities chargeable in whole or in part against the revenues

2 of said District for the fiscal year ending September 30,

3 1995, and for other purposes, are waived. During consid4 eration of the bill, all points of order against provisions

5 in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI

6 are waived.
Opinion issued Febru ary 14 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 11

- 01102

- CV

MONROE J. LEWIS , Appellant

V.

KOA GROUP, INC

. , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 993111



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Monroe J. Lewis has failed to timely file a brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

.
P. 38.6( a ) ( governing time to file brief ), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to

file brief).2 Appellant’s brief was first due on May 28, 2012. After being notified that
this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
38.8(a)(1) (authorizing dismissal for failure to file brief); 42.3(b) (allowing
involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the a ppeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown

.
EX-4.3





 Exhibit 4.3 

CERTIFICATE OF CORPORATE DOMESTICATION 

OF OAKTREE ACQUISITION CORP. 

Pursuant to Section 388 
 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware 
 Oaktree Acquisition Corp., presently a Cayman Islands exempted company limited by
shares (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY: 
 1. The Company was first incorporated on April 9, 2019 under the laws of the
Cayman Islands. 
 2. The name of the Company immediately prior to the filing of this Certificate of Corporate Domestication with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware was Oaktree Acquisition Corp. 
 3. The name of the Company as set forth in the Certificate of
Incorporation being filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in accordance with Section 388(b) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware is “Hims & Hers Health, Inc.” 

4. The jurisdiction that constituted the seat, siege social, or principal place of business or central administration of the Company
immediately prior to the filing of this Certificate of Corporate Domestication was the Cayman Islands. 
 5. The domestication has been
approved in the manner provided for by the document, instrument, agreement or other writing, as the case may be, governing the internal affairs of the Company and the conduct of its business or by applicable
non-Delaware law, as appropriate. 
 [Signature Page Follows] 

  
 [Signature Page to
Certificate of Domestication] 













 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate to be executed by its duly
authorized officer on this 20th day of January, 2021. 
  

			
	OAKTREE ACQUISITION CORP., a Cayman
	Islands exempted company limited by shares


 
			
		
	By:	 	/s/ Zaid Pardesi


 
			
	    Name: Zaid Pardesi
	    Title: Chief Financial Officer



  
 [Signature Page to
Certificate of Domestication]
Jacket: 604-659

Title: FY19 2HSJ 0319 - PATH SELF-MAILER (CONTROL; CONTROL TEST & UNIVERSAL GENDER)

Agency: DLA

Bid Opening: Feburary 21, 2019 at 2:00 PM

Bid Terms Discounted Total

$167,761.00 2.0% 20 days $164,405.78

$195,950.00 0.0% 0 days $195,950.00

MONARCH LITHO, INC

Contractor Name

CENVEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      50,948,294
<SECURITIES>                                10,591,665
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,203,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                   411,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,262,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            89,140,096
<PP&E>                                       8,606,123
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,846,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             100,695,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,158,061
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,271
<OTHER-SE>                                  93,528,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               100,695,857
<SALES>                                     49,173,298
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,173,298
<CGS>                                       21,431,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               46,181,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,415,854
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (3,326,745)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,902,548
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,419,670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,482,878
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,482,878
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 229/24 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 229 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5924 June 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 229

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5924 June 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 229/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 May 2016 to 31 May 2016(Published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 229/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 May 2016 to 31 May 2016(Published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION(Not filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned, Larry C. Oldham, the President and Chief Executive Officer ofParallel Petroleum Corporation (“Parallel”), hereby certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Parallel for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the periodic reportingrequirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained inthat Form 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Parallel.Dated:February 20, 2008              /s/ Larry C. Oldham   Larry C. Oldham,   President and Chief Executive Officer        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toParallel Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Parallel Petroleum Corporation and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Clarence T. BIRK, Appellant, v. STANDARD PARTS OF FORT LAUDERDALE, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-347.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 22, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Humes T. Lasher, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.