Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 129 / Thursday, July 5, 2018 / Notices 31415 

Regulatory section Paperwork requirement Number of 

responses 

Frequency of 

response 

Responses 

per annum 

Reporting 

hours 

Annual 

burden 

hours 

Annual cost 

§ 93.406(a) ................. Annual CFR 200 audit ......................................... 56.00 Annual ..................... 1.00 10.00 560.00 21,879.00 

§ 93.407(a)(1) ............ Program recordkeeping ....................................... 56.00 Annual ..................... 1.00 8.00 44.80 17,503.00 

§ 93.407(a)(2) ............ Project recordkeeping .......................................... 560.00 Annual ..................... 1.00 2.00 1,120.00 43,758.00 

§ 93.407(a)(3) ............ Financial recordkeeping ....................................... 56.00 Monthly ................... 12.00 2.00 1,344.00 52,510.00 

§ 93.407(a)(4) ............ Program administration records .......................... 56.00 Monthly ................... 12.00 8.00 5,376.00 210,040.00 

§ 93.407(a)(5) ............ Records concerning other Federal requirements 56.00 Annual ..................... 1.00 10.00 560.00 21,879.00 

§ 93.408 ..................... Performance reports ............................................ 56.00 Monthly ................... 12.00 2.05 1,680.00 65,638.00 

§ 93.451 ..................... Annual performance reviews ............................... 56.00 Annual ..................... 1.00 8.00 448.00 17,503.00 

Total ................... .............................................................................. 12,130.00 ................................. .................. 265.75 26,219.00 $1,024,376.00 

Total cost: 26,219 hours * $39.07 

Hourly rate for GS12). 

B. Solicitation of Public Comment 

This notice is soliciting comments 

from members of the public and affected 

parties concerning the collection of 

information described in Section A on 

the following: 

(1) Whether the proposed collection 

of information is necessary for the 

proper performance of the functions of 

the agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) The accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the proposed 

collection of information; 

(3) Ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and 

(4) Ways to minimize the burden of 

the collection of information on 

respondents; including using 

appropriate automated collection 

techniques or other forms of information 

technology, e.g., permitting electronic 

submission of responses. 

HUD encourages interested parties to 

submit comment in response to these 

questions. 

C. Authority 

Section 3507 of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35. 

Dated: June 18, 2018. 

Neal Rackleff, 

Assistant Secretary for Community Planning 

and Development. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14353 Filed 7–3–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[FWS–R4–ES–2018–N068; 

FXES11140400000–178–FF04EF2000] 

Four Habitat Conservation Plans for 

Sand Skink and Blue-Tailed Mole 

Skink, Polk and Osceola Counties, FL 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of availability; request 

for comments and information. 

SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife 

Service, announce receipt of four 

incidental take permit (ITP) applications 

and four habitat conservation plans 

(HCPs). Each of the four applicants 

requests an ITP under the Endangered 

Species Act. If granted, the ITPs would 

authorize take of the sand skink and 

blue-tailed mole skink via destruction of 

the species’ feeding, breeding, and 

sheltering habitat. The applicants are 

Tohopekaliga Water Authority; Mystic 

Dunes, LLC; Clay Cut, LLC; and Land 

Acquisition One, LLC. We invite 

comments from the public and Federal, 

Tribal, State, and local governments on 

the four applicants’ HCPs, and our draft 

environmental action statements and 

low-effect screening forms, which 

support categorical exclusions under the 

National Environmental Policy Act. 

DATES: We must receive your written 

comments on or before August 6, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: Obtaining Documents: You 

may obtain copies of the documents by 

any of the following methods: 

• Telephone: Alfredo Begazo, 772– 

469–4234 (telephone). 

• Email: alfredo_begazo@fws.gov. 

• U.S. mail: Alfredo Begazo, South 

Florida Ecological Services Office; Attn: 

[Insert appropriate ITP numbers; see 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION; U.S. Fish 

and Wildlife Service; 1339 20th Street; 

Vero Beach, FL 32960–3559. In 

addition, we will make the documents 

available for public inspection by 

appointment during normal business 

hours at this address. Please call to 

make an appointment. 

Submitting Comments: If you wish to 

comment on any of the documents, you 

may do so via any one of the following 

methods: 

• Email: alfredo_begazo@fws.gov. Use 

‘‘Attn: ITP numbers [Insert appropriate 

ITP numbers; see SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION’’ as your message subject 

line. 

• Fax: Alfredo Begazo, 772–562– 

4288, ‘‘[Attn.: [Insert appropriate ITP 

numbers; see SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION.’’ 

• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: See our 

South Florida Ecological Services Office 

address, above. Be sure to specify 

clearly the ITP applications on which 

you are commenting. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Alfredo Begazo, telephone: 772–469– 

4234. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the 

Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), 

announce receipt of four incidental take 

permit (ITP) applications and four 

habitat conservation plans (HCPs). Each 

of the four applicants requests an ITP 

under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the 

Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 

amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). 

The applicants and potential ITP 

numbers are: 

• Tohopekaliga Water Authority 

(TE69950C–0). 

• Mystic Dunes, LLC (TE69951C–0). 

• Clay Cut, LLC (TE69952C–0). 

• Land Acquisition One, LLC 

(TE69953C–0). 

Each applicant seeks authority to take 

sand skink (Neoseps reynoldsi) and 

blue-tailed mole skink (Eumeces 

egregius) via destruction of the species’ 

feeding, breeding, and sheltering habitat 

incidental to land preparation and 

construction in Polk and Osceola 

Counties, Florida. The applicants’ 

proposed HCPs provide measures to 

mitigate for the effects of their 

respective construction activities on the 

species, which were federally-listed as 

threatened in 1987 (November 6, 1987; 

52 FR 42658). 

Applicants’ Proposed Projects 

• Tohopekaliga Water Authority 

(TE69950C–0) anticipates taking 2.2 

acres of species’ habitat, incidental to 

land preparation and construction in 

Sections 10 and 11, Township 25 South, 

Range 28 East, in Polk County, Florida. 

• Mystic Dunes, LLC (ITP TE69951C– 

0) anticipates taking 6.7 acres of species’ 

habitat incidental to land preparation 

and construction in Section 15, 

Township 25 South, Range 27 East, in 

Osceola County, Florida. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
31416 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 129 / Thursday, July 5, 2018 / Notices 

• Clay Cut, LLC (ITP TE69952C–0) 

anticipates taking 8.6 acres of species’ 

habitat incidental to land preparation 

and construction in Section 3, 

Township 27 South, Range 28 East, in 

Polk County, Florida. 

• Land Acquisition One, LLC (ITP 

TE69953C–0) anticipates taking 11.2 

acres of species’ habitat incidental to 

land preparation and construction in 

Sections 18 and 19, Township 25 South, 

Range 27 East, in Osceola County, 

Florida. 

None of the applicants currently has 

a timeframe for development or specific 

site plans; however, each applicant 

intends to develop its parcel by 

constructing one or more structures and 

parking areas and installing associated 

utilities. 

The applicants propose to mitigate for 

impacts to the species by purchasing 

credits from a Service-approved 

conservation bank as follows: 

• Tohopekaliga Water Authority 

proposes to purchase the equivalent of 

4.4 acres of credits. 

• Mystic Dunes, LLC proposes to 

purchase the equivalent of 13.4 acres of 

credits. 

• Clay Cut, LLC proposes to purchase 

the equivalent of 17.2 acres of credits. 

• Land Acquisition One, LLC 

proposes to purchase the equivalent of 

22.4 acres of credits. 

Our Preliminary Determination 

The Service has made a preliminary 

determination that each of the 

applicants’ projects, including the 

mitigation measures, will individually 

and cumulatively have a minor or 

negligible effect on the species. 

Therefore, we have determined that the 

ITPs for each of these projects would be 

‘‘low effect’’ and qualify for categorical 

exclusions under the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42 

U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 

Public Availability of Comments 

Written comments we receive become 

part of the administrative record 

associated with this action. Before 

including your address, phone number, 

email address, or other personal 

identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can request in your comment 

that we withhold your personal 

identifying information from public 

review, we cannot guarantee that we 

will be able to do so. All submissions 

from organizations or businesses, and 

from individuals identifying themselves 

as representatives or officials of 

organizations or businesses, will be 

made available for public disclosure in 

their entirety. 

Authority: We provide this notice under 

section 10(c) of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 

seq.) and its implementing regulations (50 

CFR 17.22 and 17.32) and NEPA (42 U.S.C. 

4321 et seq.) and its implementing 

regulations (40 CFR 1506.6 and 43 CFR 

46.305). 

Roxanna Hinzman, 

Field Supervisor, South Florida Ecological 

Services Office. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14395 Filed 7–3–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4333–15–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1046] 

Certain Non-Volatile Memory Devices 

and Products Containing Same; Notice 

of Commission Determination To 

Review in Part a Final Initial 

Determination Finding No Violation of 

Section 337; Schedule for Filing 

Written Submissions on the Issues 

Under Review and on Remedy, the 

Public Interest and Bonding; Extension 

of Target Date 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to review 

in part the final initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) issued by the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on 

April 27, 2018, finding no violation of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), as to claims 

1–8 of U.S. Patent No. 6,552,360 (‘‘the 

’360 patent’’); claims 1–10 of U.S. Patent 

No. 6,788,602 (‘‘the ’602 patent’’); and 

claims 11–16 of U.S. Patent No. 

8,035,417 (‘‘the ’417 patent’’). The 

Commission has also determined to 

extend the target date for completion of 

this investigation until September 4, 

2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 

205–3042. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone 202–205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on 202–205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted Inv. No. 337– 

TA–1046 on April 12, 2017, based on a 

complaint filed by Macronix 

International Co., Ltd. of Hsin-chu, 

Taiwan and Macronix America, Inc. of 

Milpitas, California (collectively, 

‘‘Macronix’’). 82 FR 17687–88 (Apr. 12, 

2017). The complaint alleges violations 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain non-volatile memory devices 

and products containing the same that 

infringe one or more of claims 1–8 of the 

’360 patent; claims 1–12 and 16 of the 

’602 patent; and claims 1–7, 11–16, and 

18 of the ’417 patent. The notice of 

investigation named the following 

respondents: Toshiba Corporation of 

Tokyo, Japan; Toshiba America, Inc. of 

New York, New York; Toshiba America 

Electronic Components, Inc. of Irvine, 

California; Toshiba America Information 

Systems, Inc. of Irvine, California; and 

Toshiba Information Equipment 

(Philippines), Inc. of Binan, Philippines 

(collectively, ‘‘Toshiba’’). The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations is a party to 

the investigation. 

On June 16, 2017, the Commission 

determined not to review the ALJ’s 

order (Order No. 11) granting an 

unopposed motion to amend the Notice 

of investigation to add Toshiba Memory 

Corporation of Tokyo, Japan as a 

respondent. See Order No. 11, Comm’n 

Notice of Non-Review (June 16, 2017). 

On October 17, 2017, the Commission 

determined not to review the ALJ’s 

order (Order No. 20) granting an 

unopposed motion to terminate the 

investigation as to claims 11, 12, and 16 

of the ’602 patent. See Order No. 20, 

Comm’n Notice of Non-Review (Oct. 17, 

2017). 

On October 4, 2017, the ALJ held a 

Markman hearing to construe certain 

disputed claim terms. On December 5, 

2017, the ALJ issued Order No. 23 

(Markman Order), setting forth her 

construction of the disputed claim 

terms. 

On January 18, 2018, the Commission 

determined not to review the ALJ’s 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1