alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE GREAT
ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC. 10-Q FOR THE 12 AND 28 WEEKS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 9, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-24-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-09-2000
<CASH>                                           96394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   191032
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     801034
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1166277
<PP&E>                                         1976000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3363026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1133815
<BONDS>                                        1055561
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         38347
<OTHER-SE>                                      800357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3363026
<SALES>                                        2439534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2439534
<CGS>                                          1735281
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1735281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                691844
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               22132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8297)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2923
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5374)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5374)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Gloston HEBERT v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 53829.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1973.

In re: Gioston Hebert applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, and mandamus.

Writ denied. The minute entry at the time of the guilty plea and the evidence heard at the hearing satisfy us that the plea was properly entered.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. The record at time of plea does not satisfy Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). At the evidentiary hearing the Assistant District Attorney testified *un-qualifiedly and unequivocally*that the judge did not in 1970, at the time of this plea, interrogate the defendant relative to the free and voluntary nature of the plea under Boykin. The most that the judge did was ask the lawyer if he had informed defendant of his constitutional rights. This does not satisfy Boykin in the requirements of our state jurisprudence.

DIXON, J., dissents from refusal.
# C_2022051EN.01001401.xml

| 31.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/14

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei conti — Sezione regionale di controllo per la Campania — Italy) — Comune di Camerota

(Case C-161/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Directive 2011/85/EU - Directive 2011/7/EU - Economic and monetary policy - Local authority in financial difficulty - Financial rebalancing plan - National legislation suspending the investigative powers of the Court of Auditors due to the health crisis related to the COVID-19 pandemic - Article 267 TFEU - Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ - No dispute before the referring body - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2022/C 51/17)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte dei conti — Sezione regionale di controllo per la Campania

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Comune di Camerota

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei conti — Sezione regionale di controllo per la Campania (Court of Auditors — Regional Audit Division for Campania, Italy), made by decision of 9 March 2021, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.

---
263 La. 112

#### Robert MATTHEWS v. The DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al.

No. 52894.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 19, 1972.

In re: Robert Matthews applying for writs of certiorari and mandamus.

Writ not considered. This is a civil proceeding, and relator has not shown that he has exhausted his remedy of applying for review in the court of appeal.
Exhibit 32-1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 200218 U.S.C SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Goldfield Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, John H. Sottile, Chairman of the Board of Directors,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to The Goldfield Corporation and will beretained by The Goldfield Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: August 15, 2005

/s/ John H. SottileJohn H. Sottile Chairman of the Board of Directors,    President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,053                  33,976
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,203                   2,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21                     149
<INVENTORY>                                        281                     863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,787                  37,439
<PP&E>                                           1,018                   2,339
<DEPRECIATION>                                     574                     847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,625                  41,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,444                   4,317
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           19,248                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,321                  61,912
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,539)                (26,347)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,625                  41,051
<SALES>                                          4,137                   9,538
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,137                   9,538
<CGS>                                            1,841                   3,612
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,841                   3,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,270                  12,777
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    16                     128
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  50                     307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,822)                 (6,816)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,822)                 (6,816)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,822)                 (6,816)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (5.03)                  (2.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.03)                  (2.92)


</TABLE>
#### MILLER YACHT SALES, INC., Appellant, v. Fred P. TASNER, Appellee.

No. 71-1098.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; George W. Tedder, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Isabel BLANCO, Appellant, v. DON SAN CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-986.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 14, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 6, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Annual Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the Operating Partnership) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward J. Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of Highwoods Properties Inc., general partner of the Operating
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ EDWARD J. FRITSCH                                       
|Edward J. Fritsch                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
|March 15, 2007
# C_2023112EN.01000602.xml

| 27.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Bremen — Germany) — LB GmbH v Hauptzollamt D

(Case C-635/21, (1) LB GmbH (Air loungers))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Tariff classification - Heading 9401 - Scope - Air sofas (‘air loungers’))

(2023/C 112/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Bremen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: LB GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt D

Operative part of the judgment

Heading 9401 of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1821 of 6 October 2016, must be interpreted as not covering a type of ‘air sofa’ consisting of an inner tube made of plastic film and an outer covering made of textile fabric.

---

(1)  OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          88,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,501,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,005,000
<INVENTORY>                                 32,587,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            62,254,000
<PP&E>                                      91,056,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,503,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             187,059,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       47,299,000
<BONDS>                                    133,333,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,429,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               187,059,000
<SALES>                                    257,264,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           257,264,000
<CGS>                                      203,781,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              203,781,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            45,052,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          16,677,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,844,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,844,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,844,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.64)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 411 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 411

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 25, 1994.
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives has learned with profound regret 
and sorrow of the death of Richard Milhous Nixon, former President of the United 
States of America.
    Resolved, That in recognition of the many virtues, public and private, of 
one who served with distinction as Representative, Senator, Vice President, and 
President, the Speaker shall appoint committees of the House to join with such 
Members of the Senate as may be designated, to attend the funeral services of 
the former President.
    Resolved, That the House tenders its deep sympathy to the members of the 
family of the former President in their sad bereavement.
    Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms of the House be authorized and directed 
to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these 
resolutions, and that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be paid out 
of the contingent fund of the House.
    Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions to the Senate and 
transmit a copy of the same to the family of the former President.
    Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark 
of respect to the memory of the former President.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Roy A. GARLAND.

No. 62021.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 5, 1978.

In re: Roy A. Garland, applying for writs of certiorari, review, prohibition, mandamus. Parish of Jefferson.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
[No. 1089-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

May 1, 1972.]

#### D. H. May, *Appellant,*v. Neila M. Cook *et al., Respondents.*
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 531

To express the sense of the House regarding the appropriate portrayal of

men and women of the Armed Forces in the upcoming National Air

and Space Museum’s exhibit on the Enola Gay.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 19, 1994

Mr. ROBERTS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the House regarding the appropriate

portrayal of men and women of the Armed Forces in

the upcoming National Air and Space Museum’s exhibit

on the Enola Gay.

Whereas the role of the Enola Gay during World War II was

momentous in helping to bring World War II to a merciful end, which resulted in saving the lives of Americans

and Japanese;

Whereas the current script for the National Air and Space

Museum’s exhibit on the Enola Gay is revisionist and offensive to many World War II veterans;

Whereas the Federal law states that ‘‘the Smithsonian Institute shall commemorate and display the contributions

made by the military forces of the Nation toward creat-
2

•HRES 531 IH

ing, developing, and maintaining a free, peaceful, and

independent society and culture in the United States’’;

Whereas the Federal law also states that ‘‘the valor and sacrificial service of the men and women of the Armed

Forces shall be portrayed as an inspiration to the present

and future generations of America’’; and

Whereas, in memorializing the role of the United States in

armed conflict, the National Air and Space Museum has

an obligation under the Federal law to portray history in

the proper context of the times: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House that any

2 exhibit displayed by the National Air and Space Museum

3 with respect to the Enola Gay should reflect appropriate

4 sensitivity toward the men and women who faithfully and

5 selflessly served the United States during World War II

6 and should avoid impugning the memory of those who

7 gave their lives for freedom.

Æ
#### Stephen Robert ELLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-298.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 21, 1973.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Robert C. Parker, Jr., Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Enoch J. Whitney, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a hitchhiker, was convicted of murdering a good Samaritan who stopped and gave him a lift in total disregard of the increasing danger inherent in such practice.

The primary contention made in support of reversal is that there was no evidence of premeditation since it appeared that appellant had been taking drugs.

We reject this contention. Appellant’s ability to formulate his intent to rob his benefactor is ample evidence that his resort to drugs did not have such a disabling effect on him as to negate his ability to intend the consequence of his own acts.

The judgment is affirmed on authority of Leiby v. State, Fla., 50 So.2d 529, and Larry v. State, Fla., 104 So.2d 352.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      11,698,392
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         700,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 96,847,273
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      96,847,273
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        96,847,273
<LOANS>                                    498,726,352
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,603,128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             674,898,251
<DEPOSITS>                                 573,260,794
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,493,842
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          8,031,077
<LONG-TERM>                                 46,637,162
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       466,551
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,008,828
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             674,898,251
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             46,390,060
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,642,242
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               161,952
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            52,194,254
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          23,593,922
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          25,521,661
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       26,672,593
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                4,458,636
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             179,303
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             29,208,247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,160,588
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,658,110
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,658,110
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.86
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,709,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,332,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,970,597
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                5,188,037
<RECOVERIES>                                   361,932
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,603,128
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,603,128
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 479

Returning to the Senate the Senate amendments to the bill H.R. 4359.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 14, 1994

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Returning to the Senate the Senate amendments to the bill

H.R. 4359.

1 Resolved, That Senate amendment No. 104 to the bill

2 H.R. 4539 making appropriations for the Treasury De3 partment, the United States Postal Service, the Executive

4 Office of the President, and certain Independent Agencies,

5 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for

6 other purposes, in the opinion of this House, contravenes

7 the first clause of the seventh section of the first article

8 of the Constitution of the United States and is an in9 fringement of the privileges of this House and that such

10 bill with the Senate amendments thereto be respectfully
2

HRES 479 ATH

1 returned to the Senate with a message communicating this

2 resolution.

Æ
#### ARROWHEAD DEVELOPMENT CORP. et al., Appellants, v. Richard LOWE et al., Appellees.

No. 70-936.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 26, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Lamar Warren, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[No. 891-1.

Division Three.

September 27, 1971.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Ernest Cather Russell, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 54137, Edward E. Henry, J., entered November 10, 1971. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.