Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2018
                              Jeffrey Sattora, DAB CR5129 (2018)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Jeffrey Sattora, DAB CR5129 (2018)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Jeffrey Sattora,
	OI File No. H-17-42321-9),
	Petitioner,
v.
The Inspector General.
Docket No. C-18-557Decision No. CR5129July 21, 2018

        
              
    

      DECISION
Petitioner, Jeffrey Sattora, was a physician assistant, working in New York, who used a forged prescription to purchase the narcotic Percocet.  He was caught and pled guilty in Oneida City Court to one misdemeanor count of possessing a forged instrument.  Based on his conviction, the Inspector General (IG) excluded him for three years from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs, as authorized by section 1128(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (Act).  Petitioner appeals.
For the reasons discussed below, I find that the IG is authorized to exclude Petitioner under section 1128(b)(3) and that no mitigating factor justifies shortening the length of the exclusion.
Background
Petitioner Sattora was a licensed physician assistant working under the direction of physicians at a health care center in Oneida, New York.  IG Ex. 4 at 1, 3.  Using the name and prescription pad of a center physician, he presented to a Walgreen’s pharmacy a forged prescription for Percocet tablets.  IG Ex. 4.  A suspicious pharmacist contacted the
Page 2
physician’s medical practice and confirmed that it was stolen from the physician without his knowledge.  IG Ex. 4 at 5.
Petitioner was charged with four misdemeanors:  second degree criminal possession of a forged instrument, first degree falsifying business records, third degree identity theft, and the unlawful manufacture, sale, prescription, distribution, dispensing, administering, possessing, or transporting of a controlled substance.  IG Ex. 2.  On January 27, 2016, he pled guilty to one misdemeanor count of possessing a forged instrument.  IG Ex. 3.
In a letter dated January 31, 2018, the IG notified Petitioner that he was excluded from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs for a period of three years, because he had been convicted of a misdemeanor criminal offense “related to the unlawful manufacture, distribution, prescription or dispensing of a controlled substance . . . .”  IG Ex. 1.  Petitioner requested review.
The IG submitted a brief (IG Br.) and four exhibits (IG Exs. 1-4).  Petitioner also submitted a brief (P. Br.), with four exhibits, which (contrary to Civil Remedies Division procedures and my explicit instructions) he labeled Exs. A through D.  In the absence of any objections, I admit into evidence IG Exs. 1-4 and P. Exs. A-D.  The IG submitted a reply brief (IG Reply).
The parties agree that an in-person hearing is not necessary.  IG Br. at 6; P. Br. at 3.1
  I therefore close the record and issue this decision based on the parties’ written submissions.
Issue
The issues before me are:  whether the IG has a basis for excluding Petitioner from program participation; and, if so, whether the length of the exclusion is reasonable.
Page 3
Discussion
***1. Because Petitioner was convicted of a misdemeanor criminal offense relating to the unlawful manufacture, distribution, prescription, or dispensing of a controlled substance, the IG may exclude him from participating in all federal health care programs.2***
Section 1128(b)(3) of the Act allows the Secretary of Health and Human Services to exclude from participation in all federal health care programs an individual who has been convicted, under federal or state law, of a misdemeanor criminal offense relating to the unlawful manufacture, distribution, prescription, or dispensing of a controlled substance.  42 C.F.R. § 1001.401.  Among others who are subject to exclusion under section 1128(b)(3) is any individual who is, or has ever been, a health care practitioner or has ever been employed in any capacity in the health care industry.  42 C.F.R. § 1001.401(a).
Petitioner admits that he was convicted of a misdemeanor criminal offense.  He does not deny that his offense was related to the unlawful prescription or dispensing of a controlled substance – which it plainly was – but suggests that excluding him would not serve public policy.  P. Br. at 5.  He admitted the crime (albeit, after he was caught) and took steps to treat his substance use disorder.  But these equitable arguments have no bearing on whether Petitioner’s exclusion was legally permissible, and I have no authority to determine whether the IG should have exercised his authority to exclude. *Igor Mitreski, M.D.*, DAB No. 2665 at 4 (2015).
All of the criteria for imposing an exclusion under section 1128(b)(3) have been met in this case.  Petitioner was a health care practitioner, employed in the health care industry.  He was convicted of a misdemeanor related to the unlawful prescription or dispensing of a controlled substance.  The IG was therefore authorized to exclude him from program participation.
***2. No mitigating circumstance justifies shortening the length of Petitioner’s three-year exclusion.***
A permissive exclusion based on section 1128(b)(3) is for three years unless the Secretary determines, in accordance with published regulations, that a shorter period is appropriate because of mitigating circumstances or that a longer period is appropriate because of aggravating circumstances.  Act § 1128(c)(3)(D); 42 C.F.R. § 1001.401(c)(1).  The regulations list as mitigating just one circumstance:  that the individual’s cooperation with federal or state officials resulted in:  others being convicted or excluded; other cases
Page 4
being investigated; reports being issued by the appropriate law enforcement agency identifying program vulnerabilities or weaknesses; or civil money penalties being imposed against others.
That Petitioner “cooperated” with law enforcement in his own case, after he was caught, does not create a mitigating circumstance.  He complains that, because of its nature, his crime did not lend itself to the level of cooperation and the results required by the regulation.  I’ve no doubt that the drafters of the regulation recognized the obvious fact that this factor would apply to a limited number of crimes.  At the time 42 C.F.R. § 1001.401 was initially promulgated, “[c]ommenters contended that cooperation itself should be considered mitigating, regardless of whether another individual or entity was sanctioned.”  57 Fed. Reg. 3298, 3315 (Jan. 29, 1992).  The drafters responded that while cooperation generally factors into the decision whether to exclude at all, “only significant cooperation should be considered mitigating, and the imposition of a sanction as a result of cooperation establishes that the cooperation was significant.”  *Id.*  A later amendment to the regulation expanded this mitigating factor, but only to include situations where cooperation led to additional investigations or law enforcement issuing reports identifying program vulnerabilities or weaknesses.  *See* 63 Fed. Reg. 46,676, 46,681, 46,688 (Sept. 2, 1998).  Limiting the scope of mitigation is well within the authority granted the Secretary by section 1128(c), and I am bound to follow the Secretary’s regulations.
Conclusion
The IG was authorized to exclude Petitioner from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal health care programs, and no mitigating circumstance justifies shortening the length of the three-year exclusion.


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. Petitioner nevertheless suggests that his testimony “would be helpful as the mitigating factors relate specifically to Petitioner’s own conduct and treatment for [substance use disorders].”  P. Br. at 3-4.  As I explain below, however, Petitioner’s proffered testimony is not relevant to the issues before me and therefore is not admissible.  42 C.F.R. § 1005.17(c); see Order and Schedule for Filing Briefs and Documentary Evidence at 3-4 (¶ 7) (March 15, 2018). back to note 1
                      2. My findings of fact/conclusions of law are set forth, in italics and bold, in the discussion captions of this decision. back to note 2 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back