Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2019
                              Welim S. Azinge, M.D., DAB CR5373 (2019)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Welim S. Azinge, M.D., DAB CR5373 (2019)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Welim S. Azinge, M.D.,
	(NPI: 1194274167 / PTAN: CB276972),
	Petitioner,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Respondent.
Docket No. C-18-185Decision No. CR5373July 15, 2019

        
              
    

      DECISION
Noridian Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (Noridian), an administrative contractor for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), granted Medicare billing privileges to Welim S. Azinge, M.D. (Petitioner or Dr. Azinge) effective June 6, 2017 and allowed retrospective billing from May 7, 2017. Petitioner requested a hearing before an administrative law judge to dispute this effective date. As explained herein, Noridian correctly determined that Petitioner’s Medicare enrollment and associated billing privileges became effective June 6, 2017 with a retrospective billing date of May 7, 2017. I therefore affirm CMS’s effective date determination.
I. Background
On June 6, 2017, Noridian received a Form CMS-855I to enroll Petitioner in the Medicare program and establish Medicare billing privileges. CMS Exhibit (Ex.) 1 at 2; CMS Ex. 2 at 1-42. Noridian approved this application and enrolled Petitioner in the Medicare program with billing privileges effective June 6, 2017. CMS Ex. 3 at 1.
Page 2
Petitioner requested reconsideration of Noridian’s initial determination and asked that her effective date be changed to October 24, 2016 – the date she began treating Medicare patients. CMS Ex. 4 at 1. In its September 21, 2017 reconsidered determination, Noridian denied Petitioner’s request for an earlier effective date. *Id.*
Petitioner timely requested a hearing before an administrative law judge. I was designated to hear and decide this case and on November 16, 2017, issued an Acknowledgment and Pre-Hearing Order (Pre-Hearing Order) that required each party to file a pre-hearing exchange and any supporting documents. Pre-Hearing Order ¶ 4.
CMS filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (CMS Motion), Memorandum in Support (CMS Br.) and four exhibits (CMS Exs. 1-4) five days after its December 21, 2017 filing deadline. On January 4, 2018, I issued an Order to Show Cause (CMS OSC) giving CMS 10 days to show good cause for its failure to timely fail its pre-hearing exchange. CMS OSC at 1. CMS explained that its late filing was caused by an internal clerical error during transfer from a different regional office. CMS Resp. to OSC at 2. On that basis, I found good cause to allow CMS’s late filing and extended Petitioner’s time to file her pre-hearing exchange accordingly. Order Discharging Show Cause Order and Extending Pre-Hearing Exchange Deadlines at 1.
Petitioner also failed to file her pre-hearing exchange in a timely manner. I therefore issued an Order to Show Cause (Petitioner OSC) on February 15, 2018 giving Petitioner until March 1, 2018 to file her pre-hearing exchange and explain her failure to file timely. Petitioner OSC at 1-2. Petitioner responded that she had been unaware of the prior filing deadlines. P. Response to OSC at 1. Because CMS failed to timely file its pre-hearing exchange, I find good cause to allow Petitioner to file out of time.
Petitioner also submitted three supporting documents.1
 I therefore construe her response to my show-cause order and its accompanying exhibits to constitute her pre-hearing exchange.
II. Decision on the Written Record and Admission of Exhibits
Neither party objected to the exhibits offered by the other. Therefore, in the absence of objection, I admit CMS Exs. 1-4 and P. Exs. 1-3 into evidence. Neither party offered written direct testimony of any witness as part of its pre-hearing exchange, meaning an in-person hearing is not necessary in this matter. Pre-Hearing Order ¶¶ 8-10; Civ. Remedies Div. Pro. 16(b), 19(b). Therefore, I will decide this case on the record, based
Page 3
on the parties’ written submissions and arguments. Civ. Remedies Div. Pro. 19(d). CMS’s motion for summary judgment is denied as moot.
III. Issue
The issue in this case is whether Noridian, acting on behalf of CMS, properly established June 6, 2017, as the effective date for Petitioner’s Medicare billing privileges.
IV. Jurisdiction
I have jurisdiction to decide this case. 42 C.F.R. §§ 498.3(b)(15), 498.5(l)(2); *see also* Social Security Act (Act) § 1866(j)(8) (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1395cc(j)(8)).
V. Discussion
**A. Applicable Law**
The Act authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services to promulgate regulations governing the enrollment process for providers and suppliers. Act §§ 1102, 1866(j) (42 U.S.C. §§ 1302, 1395cc(j)). A “supplier” like Petitioner is “a physician or other practitioner, a facility, or other entity (other than a provider of services) that furnishes items or services” under the Medicare provisions of the Act. Act § 1861(d) (42 U.S.C. § 1395x(d)); *see also* Act § 1861(u) (42 U.S.C. § 1395x(u)).
A supplier must enroll in the Medicare program to receive payment for covered Medicare items or services. 42 C.F.R. § 424.505. The regulations define “*Enroll/Enrollment*” as “the process that Medicare uses to establish eligibility to submit claims for Medicare‐covered items and services.” 42 C.F.R. § 424.502. A supplier seeking billing privileges under the Medicare program must “submit enrollment information on the applicable enrollment application. Once the provider or supplier successfully completes the enrollment process . . . CMS enrolls the provider or supplier into the Medicare program.” 42 C.F.R. § 424.510(a). CMS then establishes an effective date for billing privileges under the requirements stated in 42 C.F.R. § 424.520(d) and may permit a retrospective billing date that is 30 or 90 days prior to the effective date under 42 C.F.R. §§ 424.521(a)(1)-(2).
Page 4
**B. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law2**
***1. Noridian received Dr. Azinge’s Medicare enrollment application on June 6, 2017 and subsequently processed that application to approval, making that date the effective date of her enrollment.***
The effective date3
 for Medicare billing privileges for physicians, non-physician practitioners, and physician or non-physician practitioner organizations is the later of the “date of filing” or the date the supplier first began furnishing services at a new practice location. 42 C.F.R. § 424.520(d). The “date of filing” is the date that the Medicare contractor “receives” a signed enrollment application that the Medicare contractor is able to process to approval. 73 Fed. Reg. 69,726, 69,769 (Nov. 19, 2008); *Donald Dolce,* *M.D.*, DAB No. 2685 at 8 (2016). The regulations allow suppliers to “retrospectively bill” Medicare, meaning CMS permits a supplier to bill Medicare for services occurring up to thirty days before the effective date of enrollment, if certain circumstances apply. 42 C.F.R § 424.521(a)(1).
Petitioner concedes that she did not complete her Medicare enrollment until June 2017. P. Response to OSC at 1. Noridian indicates in its reconsidered determination that it received Petitioner’s Medicare enrollment application on June 6, 2017, which it ultimately approved. CMS Ex. 1 at 2. CMS submitted no evidence to corroborate Noridian’s June 6, 2017 receipt of Petitioner’s enrollment application. However, Dr. Azinge’s enrollment application is postmarked June 2, 2017 by certified priority U.S. mail, so it is reasonable to conclude Noridian received Petitioner’s application on June 6, 2017. CMS Ex. 2 at 28. Because she sent her application by certified mail, Petitioner could easily rebut this date of receipt with U.S.P.S. tracking information; the fact that she has not contested the receipt date asserted by CMS satisfies me that the date of receipt of her enrollment application was in fact June 6, 2017.
Noridian subsequently approved the application that was received June 6, 2017 and assigned a retrospective billing date of May 7, 2017. CMS Br. at 4; CMS Ex. 3 at 1. The plain language of the governing regulations requires me to find the effective date of
Page 5
Petitioner’s Medicare enrollment to be June 6, 2017. 42 C.F.R. §§ 424.520(d), 424.521(a)(1).
***2. I have no authority to consider Dr. Azinge’s equitable arguments.***
The substance of Petitioner’s pre-hearing exchange is devoted to her argument that her Medicare enrollment was delayed due to the inaction of her billing company, which she had relied on to file her enrollment application. P. Response to OSC at 1. Her argument and exhibits make an equitable claim for relief, acknowledging the delay in filing her application, but relying on the quality of treatment she provided to Medicare beneficiaries prior to her filing date. P. Exs. 1-3.
I am fully sympathetic to Petitioner’s position, and recognize she did not personally cause the delay in filing of her enrollment application. However, my jurisdiction in this case is limited to review of CMS’s determination of the effective date of Petitioner’s enrollment application under § 424.520(d). As I have explained, CMS properly determined pursuant to the controlling regulations that June 6, 2017 is Petitioner’s effective date of enrollment, as that is the date Noridian received an application from her that it was able to successfully approve. Though it might be fair to compensate Petitioner for the services she provided to Medicare patients prior to her retrospective billing date, I do not have authority to provide equitable relief based on principles of fairness or equitable estoppel, and thus I am unable change Petitioner’s effective date for that reason. *US Ultrasound*, DAB No. 2302 at 8 (2010) (“Neither the ALJ or the Board is authorized to provide equitable relief by reimbursing or enrolling a supplier who does not meet statutory or regulatory requirements.”).
IV. Conclusion
I affirm CMS’s determination that Petitioner’s effective date for Medicare billing privileges is June 6, 2017, with a retrospective billing date of May 7, 2017.


          /s/
        Bill Thomas

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. For clarity and consistency, Petitioner’s Supporting Documents numbered 11a-11c in DAB E-file are referred to in this opinion as P. Exs. 1-3. back to note 1
                      2. My findings of fact and conclusions of law appear as numbered headings in bold italic type. back to note 2
                      3. Both Noridian’s reconsidered determination and CMS’s brief mistakenly identify May 7, 2017 as the “effective date” of Petitioner’s enrollment. CMS Br. at 4; CMS Ex. 1 at 2. The governing regulations define the “effective date” of enrollment as the date CMS or a contractor receives an enrollment application from a supplier that it eventually approved. See 42 C.F.R. § 424.520(d). Here, May 7, 2017 is the retrospective billing date, which is not the same thing. CMS Ex. 1 at 2; 42 C.F.R. § 424.521(a)(1). For clarity and correctness, I use the term “effective date” in this decision to refer to the effective date established by regulation (June 6, 2017), not the date from which retrospective billing is authorized (May 7, 2017). back to note 3 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back