alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>
	 	  		  	  EXHIBIT 31.01

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

   b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and



<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of Demeter's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

	b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:   March 15, 2004      /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman
	Jeffrey A. Rothman
	President,
	Demeter Management Corporation,
	general partner of the
	registrant
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               8
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      333
<ALLOWANCES>                                        27
<INVENTORY>                                         20
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   904
<PP&E>                                           4,350
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,658
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              688
<BONDS>                                            648
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           650
<OTHER-SE>                                         425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,938
<SALES>                                            892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   892
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      320
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  39
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    533
<INCOME-TAX>                                       194
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                339
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      5
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       335
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, R. Andrew Kingston , Chief Executive Officer of Dynamotive
Energy Systems Corporation (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                 

| | By:    | /s/
      R. Andrew Kingston
| | ------ | ----------------------------
| | Name:  | R. Andrew Kingston          
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer     
| |        |                             
| | Date:  | April 28, 2008              

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 534

To correct the engrossment of the amendment of the House of Representatives

to the Senate bill (S. 725).

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 20, 1994

Mr. WAXMAN submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To correct the engrossment of the amendment of the House

of Representatives to the Senate bill (S. 725).

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. RETURN.

3 The Senate is requested to return to the House of

4 Representatives the amendment of the House to the Sen5 ate bill (S. 725).

6 SEC. 2. CORRECTION.

7 Upon the return of the House amendment to the Sen8 ate bill (S. 725), the Clerk of the House of Representatives

9 shall make the following change in the engrossment of the
2

HRES 534 ATH

1 House amendment: Strike section 5 and insert the follow2 ing:

3 ‘‘SEC. 5. STATE STANDARDS.

4 ‘‘(a) PREEMPTION.—Section 403A(a) of the Federal

5 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 343–1(a)) is

6 amended—

7 ‘‘(1) in paragraph (1), by inserting at the end

8 the following: ‘except that this paragraph does not

9 apply to a standard of identity of—

10 ‘‘ ‘(A) a State or political subdivision of a

11 State for maple syrup which is of the type re12 quired by sections 401 and 403(g), or

13 ‘‘ ‘(B) a State for fluid milk which is of the

14 type required by sections 401 and 403(g) and

15 which specifies a higher minimum level of milk

16 components than is provided for in the cor17 responding standard of identity promulgated

18 under section 401,’,

19 ‘‘(2) in paragraph (2), by inserting at the end

20 the following: ‘except that this paragraph does not

21 apply to a requirement of a State or political sub22 division of a State which is of the type required by

23 section 403(c) and which is applicable to maple

24 syrup,’,
3

HRES 534 ATH

1 ‘‘(3) in paragraph (3), by inserting at the end

2 the following: ‘except that this paragraph does not

3 apply to a requirement of a State or political sub4 division of a State which is of the type required by

5 section 403(h)(1) and which is applicable to maple

6 syrup,’, and

7 ‘‘(4) by adding at the end the following: ‘For

8 purposes of paragraph (1)(B), the term ‘‘fluid milk’’

9 means liquid milk in final packaged form for bev10 erage use and does not include dry milk, manufac11 tured milk products, or tanker bulk milk.’ ’’.

12 (b) PROCEDURE.—Section 701(e)(1) of such Act (21

13 U.S.C. 371(e)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘or maple syrup

14 (regulated under section 168.140 of title 21, Code of Fed15 eral Regulations)’’.

Æ
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Attn: U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: ON THE MARK MEDIA, LLC dba. ON THE MARK MEDIA/ON THE MARK RENTALS REQUEST AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI Phantom 2 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95) Jeffrey Markham CEO On The Mark Media 10812 Hubbard Way, San Jose, CA 95127 408-250-2444 jeff@otm-media.com
No. 11324.

#### The City of Toledo *v.*Smith.

Decided January 12, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas county.

*Mr. Charles S. Northup,*city solicitor, and *Mr. Charles H. Masters,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Charles A. Aten*and *Mr. Charles K. Friedman,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis, Sitaucic and Price, JJ., concur.
# Buildings and Real Estate Tools

Occupancy Agreement Space Inventory System (OASIS)

The Public Buildings Service has transitioned from eOA to OASIS as its occupancy agreement tool.

Real Estate Disposal Search Tool

For agencies and the public. Search available properties, from office buildings to single-family homes.

Inventory of Owned and Leased Properties (IOLP)

For congressional staffers or businesses seeking opportunities in federal real estate. View data for GSA-owned and -leased properties using our predefined searches.

Rent on the Web (ROW)

For GSA customer agencies. View current monthly or historical rent bills online.

Map of Building Projects

For construction managers, builders, and project teams. Search maps of current and planned GSA construction and renovation/alteration projects.

Sustainable Facilities Tool (SFTool)

For facility managers, designers, tenants, and the general public. Learn about federal sustainability requirements, plan sustainable projects, and search and purchase sustainable products and services.

Print PageEmail Page

Top

-  Tools Overview-  Overview 
-  Buildings and Real Estate Tools    -  Inventory of GSA Owned and Leased Properties 
-  Buying and selling tools 
-  HR Management and Careers Tools 
-  Personal Property disposal and auctions tools 
-  Technology Tools 
-  Training Tools 
-  Travel Tools 
-  Vehicles Tools
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Williams, Appellant.

[721 NYS2d 806]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered November 24, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Vaughan, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The People established at the hearing that the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant based on the testimony of a backup officer involved in a so-called “buy and bust” operation. That officer testified that he received a radio transmission from an undercover officer of a “positive buy” together with a description of the seller and his location. The seller was described as a heavy-set black male, wearing a blue raincoat, blue jeans, and white sneakers. Minutes later, the officer arrested the defendant, who fit the description, approximately one block from the location of the drug transaction. None of the other individuals present at the location matched the undercover officer’s description *(see, People v Ketcham,*93 NY2d 416; *People v Maldonado,*86 NY2d 631, 635-636; *People v Allison,*270 AD2d 148; *People v Pegram,*203 AD2d 391). The defen*570dant’s contention that the description provided by the undercover officer was too meager to support a finding of probable cause is without merit *(see, People v Ketcham, supra; People v Pegram, supra).*The hearing court thus properly denied the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence recovered from his person. O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

EF/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TERRY JOHNSON,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

JEAN HILL,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 07-36083

D.C. No. CV-05-01504-BR

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 

Oregon state prisoner Terry Johnson appeals from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction

FILED

DEC 11 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
EF/Research 2 07-36083

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Johnson contends that the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by

imposing consecutive sentences based on factual findings that were not proven

beyond a reasonable doubt. Our independent review of the record, see Larson v.

Palmateer, 515 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2008), indicates that the state courts’

rejection of Johnson’s Sixth Amendment claim was not contrary to, and did not

involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court law. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1); see also Oregon v. Ice, 129 S. Ct. 711, 714-15 (2009);

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 

AFFIRMED.
#### THE STATE use of ELIZA A. BROWN *vs.*WILLIAM BROWN.

The condition of an administrator’s bond does not extend to rents.

Debt on an administration bond, by an heir at law. Narr suggesting breaches. Pleas, Rep. Issue.

The only question was whether the administrator and his surety were liable on his bond for rents received after the death of the intestate.

Mr. *Wootten*thought the act of assembly not so plain as to preclude argument on this point. He thought the construction should be, that the bond of an administrator did not compel him to receive the rents, but should extend to cases where he did receive them.

Clayton, *Ch. Justice.*

It was decided in Kent, twenty-five years ago, by the late Court of Common Pleas in *Vanhoy's*case that, even under the old law, you could not bring an action on the bond for rents. The reason was, that the condition of the administration bond did not cover rents, but was only for the faithful administration of the goods and chattels, rights and credits of the decedent. Rents are not such. The late Supreme Court made the same decision in the case of *Barber*vs. *M'Clyment’s Ex’rs.*It is true, the act of assembly makes them *quasi*assets for the payment of debts, but they do *6not therefore, come within the condition of the bond. They may be recovered in an action of assumpsit. (Dig. 228.)

*Wootten*for plaintiff,

*Layton*and *Frame*for defendants.

Judgment of nonsuit.
#### THE STATE for the use of WM. M. FOWLER and wife *vs.*THOMAS ROBINSON.

A receipt in full, though strong prima facie evidence of entire payment, is not conclusive. .

Sci. Fa. on a recognizance in the Orphans’ Court. Pleas, payment, set-off, and the act of limitations. Replication, infancy.

The defendant produced a receipt in full from the guardian of Mrs. Fowler. It purported to be in full of two shares of the appraised value of the lands secured by the recognizance; and not merely of a balance, but it did not amount to as much as the two shares with the interest due thereon.

*Layton*for plaintiff.

*Robinson*for defendant.

*The Court*

told the jury that the receipt, though strong prima facie evidence of a payment in full was not conclusive, and might be examined into. If the jury thought there was a mistake, and this appeared to them on the evidence, they might find a sum due the plaintiff, notwithstanding the receipt in full of her guardian.

The plaintiff had a verdict.
# Official Journal C 76A/30 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 76A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4830 March 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 76A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4830 March 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2005/C 076A/1 | Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Medicines Agency

2005/C 076A/1

Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of Borders Group, Inc.

<Table>
<Caption>
SUBSIDIARY                                              STATE OF INCORPORATION
----------                                              ----------------------
<S>                                                     <C>
Borders, Inc.                                              Colorado
Borders Fulfillment, Inc.                                  Delaware
Borders Management, LLC                                    Michigan
Borders Online, LLC                                        Delaware
Borders Online, Inc.                                       Colorado
Borders Outlet, Inc.                                       Colorado
Borders Properties, Inc.                                   Delaware
Walden Book Company, Inc.                                  Colorado
Walden Online, Inc.                                        Colorado
Waldenbooks Properties, Inc.                               Delaware
Borders (UK) Limited
  formerly Books etc. Limited                              U.K.
Borders New Zealand Limited                                New Zealand
Borders PTE. Limited                                       Singapore
Borders Australia PTY, Limited                             Australia
BGI (UK) Limited                                           U.K.
BGP (UK) Limited                                           U.K.
Evermatch Limited                                          U.K.
Books Etc Properties Limited                               U.K.
Meridian Books Limited                                     U.K.
Borders Superstores (UK) Limited                           U.K.
Charing Cross Properties Limited                           U.K.
Borders Development, Inc.                                  Michigan
Borders Bookstore (M) SDN.BHD                              Malaysia
Borders Books Ireland Limited                              Ireland
Borders International Services, Inc.                       Michigan
Paperchase Products Limited                                U.K.
Paperchase Limited                                         U.K.
Paperchase Design Limited                                  U.K.
Planet Music, Inc.                                         North Carolina
The Library, Ltd.                                          Missouri
</Table>