alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 271

Urging the President to initiate the immediate orderly withdrawal of United

States Armed Forces from Somalia, to ensure the safe return of all

members of the Armed Forces being held prisoner by Somali warlords,

and to recover the remains of members of the Armed Forces killed

in Somalia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 6, 1993

Mr. WELDON (for himself, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, and Mr. MICA) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

RESOLUTION

Urging the President to initiate the immediate orderly withdrawal of United States Armed Forces from Somalia,

to ensure the safe return of all members of the Armed

Forces being held prisoner by Somali warlords, and to

recover the remains of members of the Armed Forces

killed in Somalia.

Whereas United States Armed Forces were sent to Somalia

under Operation Restore Hope in December 1992 to establish a secure environment for humanitarian relief

operations;

Whereas 28,000 members of the Armed Forces contributed

to this successful effort which enabled the delivery of food

to Somalians and halted mass starvation;
2

•HRES 271 IH

Whereas the stated intention of the United States Government was to achieve these objectives and promptly hand

over operations to a United Nations peacekeeping force,

and the Commander in Chief of the United States

Central Command stated that this mission had been

achieved in March 1993;

Whereas United States allies, including France, Canada,

Greece, Norway, New Zealand, Sweden, and Turkey,

have withdrawn or are in the process of withdrawing

forces from United Nations operations in Somalia;

Whereas the United States has incurred over $1,500,000,000

in costs associated with Operation Restore Hope and support for continued United Nations operations in Somalia;

Whereas as of October 5, 1993, 23 members of the Armed

Forces have lost their lives and over 150 have been

wounded in Somalia;

Whereas United States citizens have witnessed the brutal

treatment of United States prisoners in Somalia; and

Whereas the United States Government’s commitment in Somalia is open-ended and its military mission vague, and

United States Armed Forces are needlessly being placed

at risk when the United States no longer has a vital interest in the outcome of the civil war in Somalia: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the President should use all necessary

3 resources—

4 (1) to secure the immediate, safe return of

5 those members of the United States Armed Forces

6 being held prisoner by Somalia warloads;
3

•HRES 271 IH

1 (2) to recover the remains of the members of

2 the Armed Forces killed in Somalia; and

3 (3) to begin immediately the orderly withdrawal

4 of United States Armed Forces from Somalia.

Æ
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0801 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-106-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 7.0 $ 595.00 $0 $ 595.00 200 $119,000.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $119,000

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Replacement 7.0 $ 595.00 $29,289 $29,884.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): On Condition 

replacement cost does not include flight test costs.
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
#### David W. CLEMENTS, Petitioner, v. MAULE INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 41908.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 3, 1972.

Certiorari dismissed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
#### Sadie MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-493.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 4, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
         CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP, INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the 1998 Form 10-K/A of CBT Group PLC of our report dated January
30, 1998, on the consolidated financial statements of The ForeFront Group,
Inc., and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and for each of the two years
in the period ended December 31, 1997, included in the Form S-4 Registration
Statement of CBT Group PLC (File No. 333-51159). It should be noted that we
have not audited any financial statements of The ForeFront Group, Inc. and
subsidiaries subsequent to December 31, 1997, or performed any audit procedures
subsequent to the date of our report.
 
                                          /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
 
Houston, Texas
April 30, 1999
 
                                       70
No. 10984.

#### The Columbus, Newark & Zanesville Electric Railway Co. *v.*Wilson.

Decided October 20, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Licking county.

*Mr. W. R. Pomerene*and *Mr. J. R. Fitsgibbon,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Flory & Flory,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, .C. J., Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### BEN’S SELTZER, INC., and John Lee Brown, Petitioners, v. William T. MARKEY et al., Respondents.

No. 41927.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 3, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 254 So.2d 377.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
# C_2020201EN.01005101.xml

| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/51

---

Action brought on 23 April 2020 — Target Brands v EUIPO — The a.r.t. company b&s (art class)

(Case T-221/20)

(2020/C 201/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Target Brands Inc. (Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States) (represented by: A. Norris, Barrister)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The a.r.t. company b&s, SA (Quel, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark art class — Application for registration No 16 888 737

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 February 2020 in Case R 1596/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | reject the opposition decision in respect of all of the remaining contested goods; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition decision in respect of all of the remaining contested goods;

| — | alternatively, remit the matter to the EUIPO for re-consideration; |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively, remit the matter to the EUIPO for re-consideration;

| — | order to pay its costs incurred in connection with this appeal, the appeal before the Board and the Opposition. |
| --- | --- |

—

order to pay its costs incurred in connection with this appeal, the appeal before the Board and the Opposition.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 12

GTE North Incorporated and Subsidiary

STATEMENT OF THE CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Six Months
                                                                     Ended
                                                                 June 30, 1998
                                                                 -------------
<S>                                                                 <C>     
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income before extraordinary charge                                $303,067
  Add - Income taxes                                                 182,623
      - Fixed charges                                                 75,195
                                                                    --------

Adjusted earnings                                                   $560,885
                                                                    ========

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                                  $ 71,251
  Portion of rent expense
      representing interest                                            3,944
                                                                    ========

Adjusted fixed charges                                              $ 75,195
                                                                    ========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                      7.46
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 465 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 465

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 28, 1994.
    Resolved, That during consideration of the bill (H.R. 4624) making 
appropriations for the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 
Development, and for sundry independent agencies, boards, commissions, 
corporations, and offices for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for 
other purposes, all points of order against provisions in the bill for failure 
to comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are waived. The amendment numbered 1 in 
the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution may be offered 
only by a Member designated in the report, may amend portions of the bill not 
yet read for amendment, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for two 
hours equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 
be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of 
the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. Points of order 
against the amendments printed in the report of the Committee on Rules for 
failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the
Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Gerald D. KelferGerald D. KelferPresident and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2022222EN.01002604.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/26

---

Order of the President of the Court of 15 February 2022 — European Union Copper Task Force v European Commission, European Parliament, Council of the European Union

(Case C-828/21 P) (1)

(2022/C 222/44)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.

---
### In The Matter Of: EPA Bristol Bay Public Meeting - New Stuyahok August 13, 2014 Midnight Sun Court Reporters 511 W. 9th Ave. Anchorage, AK 99501 Ph. 907-258-7100 Fax 907-276-6727

To open files, click on the desired file type in bookmark on left. For quick saving or searching multiple files, click attachments tab (or paperclip) on left. For best viewing/searching, use Adobe Reader/Acrobat ver. 9 or higher (www.adobe.com).
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

          In connection with the accompanying  Annual Report of Moro Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-KSB for the period  ended  December  31, 2003 (the
"Report"),  I, David W.  Menard,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: April 13, 2004                                /s/ David W. Menard

                                                     -------------------
                                                     David W. Menard
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2023035EN.01001801.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa — Latvia) — AAS ‘BTA Baltic Insurance Company’ v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs, Tieslietu ministrija

(Case C-769/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public procurement - Directive 2014/24/EU - Article 18(1) - Principles of equal treatment, transparency and proportionality - Decision to withdraw an invitation to tender - Tenders submitted separately by two tenderers belonging to the same economic operator and constituting the two most economically advantageous tenders - Refusal of the successful tenderer to sign the contract - Decision of the contracting authority to refuse the tender of the next tenderer, terminate the procedure and issue a new call for tenders)

(2023/C 35/20)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Administratīvā rajona tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AAS ‘BTA Baltic Insurance Company’

Defendants: Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs, Tieslietu ministrija

Operative part of the judgment

The principle of proportionality, within the meaning of Article 18(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC,

must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which requires the contracting authority to terminate a public procurement procedure where, in the event of withdrawal of the tenderer originally selected for having submitted the most economically advantageous tender, the tenderer which submitted the next most economically advantageous tender constitutes with the tenderer originally selected a single economic operator.

---

(1)  OJ C 84, 21.2.2022.

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         I, Carl W. Balezentis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Lark Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Lark Technologies, Inc.

                                   By:    /s/ CARL W. BALEZENTIS, Ph.D
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Carl W. Balezentis, Ph.D
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


         I, Jon Luksich, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Lark Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December
31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Lark Technologies, Inc.

                                   By:    /s/ JON H. LUKSICH
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Jon H. Luksich
                                          Controller
EXHIBIT 99.13  

**CONSENT OF**

**Darren Lindsay, P. Geo.**

 

To the Board of Directors of Miramar Mining Corporation.

I consent to the reference to me in this annual report on Form 40-F of Miramar Mining Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006 as having prepared resource estimates for the Naartok and Rand portions of the Madrid systems and to the use of my name in this annual report.

Dated as of the 30th day of March 2007

**Darren Lindsay, P. Geo.**

**/s/ Darren Lindsay          **

 

 

 

 

 

----
# GSA Mentor-Protege Program Application

                - Title:  GSA Mentor-Protege Program Application 
                - Form #:         GSA3695      
                - Current Revision Date:  01/2016
                - Authority or Regulation:  APD 2800.12B

PDF versions of forms use Adobe      ReaderTM.      Download Adobe ReaderTM

Search for another form

Print PageEmail Page

Top
#### Janet Morse HOUSE, Appellant, v. William W. HOUSE, Appellee.

No. 70-867.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 15, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stewart F. LaMotte, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Bessie Duke GONZALES and Louis B. Gonzales v. CHECKER CABS, INC., et al.

No. 54390.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 1, 1974.

In re: Bessie Duke Gonzales and Louis B. Gonzales, applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 286 So.2d 718.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.

CALOGERO, J.,

dissents from refusal to grant. Both the trial and appellate courts seem to have required of plaintiff a burden of proof not required of a fare paying common carrier passenger. See Wise v. Prescott, 244 La. 157, 151 So.2d 356 (1963).
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 478

To recognize Mennonite Mutual Aid.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 14, 1994

Mr. BROWN of Ohio submitted the following resolution; which was referred

jointly to the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means

RESOLUTION

To recognize Mennonite Mutual Aid.

Whereas the First Amendment to the Constitution of the

United States firmly establishes that Congress shall make

no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion;

Whereas the Mennonite Church has believed for more than

400 years that genuinely Christian mutual aid must be

practiced within a disciplined congregation where individual responsibility for sharing is assumed;

Whereas Mennonite Mutual Aid (or ‘‘MMA’’) was established

as an official program board of the Mennonite Church;

Whereas MMA is responsible for mutual aid and stewardship

programs and services relating to health care that are in

keeping with biblical imperatives of sharing and compassion as interpreted by the Mennonite Church;
2

•HRES 478 IH

Whereas MMA is operated to reflect Mennonite beliefs and

values which are commonly shared;

Whereas MMA qualifies as a tax-exempt organization under

section 501(c)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;

Whereas MMA bears the risk of insuring its own members

and is subject to regulation by the State insurance commissioner in each State in which it sells coverage; and

Whereas MMA offers its members benefits, such as special

help for costs not included in standard health plans, premium assistance for members with dependents who have

mental or physical disabilities, and assistance with adoption expenses: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That in any national health insurance re2 form legislation that provides for universal coverage, there

3 be a provision that permits Mennonites to continue receiv4 ing their health coverage through Mennonite Mutual Aid.

Æ