alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.7


 


Astrea
Acquisition Corp. 

55 Ocean Lane Drive, Apt. 3021

Key Biscayne, FL 33149


 


[●],
2021


 


Astrea
Acquisition Sponsor LLC

55 Ocean Lane Drive, Apt. 3021

Key Biscayne, FL 33149


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the
registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of securities of Astrea Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the
consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described
in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”),
Astrea Acquisition Sponsor LLC (the “Sponsor”) shall make available to the Company certain office space
and administrative and support services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 55 Ocean Lane Drive,
Apt. 3021, Key Biscayne, Florida 33149 (or any successor location). In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay the Sponsor the
sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. Sponsor hereby agrees
that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account
(the “Trust Account”) to be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”)
and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements
with the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


 


[Signature
Page Follows]


 






     


     


    

 


		Very
                                  truly yours,
	 	 
	 	ASTREA
                                         ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	 	Name:	Felipe
                                         Gonzalez
	 	 	Title:	Chief
                                         Executive Officer



 


	AGREED TO AND
ACCEPTED BY:
	 
	ASTREA ACQUISITION
SPONSOR LLC
	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 
	 	Name:	 	 
	 	Title:	 	 



 


 


[Signature Page to Administrative
Services Agreement]
#### William E. McADOO, Petitioner, v. MODERN FOODS, INC., Glens Falls Insurance Co., and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38871.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 24, 1969.

William D. Roth, of Stanley, Durrance, Woods & Wines, Lakeland, for petitioner.

A. Broaddus Livingston, of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Tampa, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida In*804dustrial Commission bearing date June 25, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for claimant’s attorney’s fee is also denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 264 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 264

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 14, 1993.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2351) to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 1994 and 1995 to 
carry out the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, 
and the Museum Services Act. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed 
with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Education and Labor. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be 
considered as read. No amendment to the bill shall be in order except those 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 
Each amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be 
offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, 
shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, 
and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House 
or in the Committee of the Whole. Points of order against the amendments printed 
in the report for failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XVI are waived. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 
and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 
thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to 
recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IB

House Calendar No. 182

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 470

[Report No. 103–569]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 4454) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for

the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 29, 1994

Mr. DERRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 4454) making appropriations

for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending

September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 4454) making appropriations for

4 the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending Septem5 ber 30, 1995, and for other purposes. All points of order

6 against the conference report and against its consideration
2

HRES 470 RH

1 are waived. The conference report shall be considered as

2 read.

House Calendar No. 182

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 470

[Report No. 103–569]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reother purposes. fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the port to accompany the bill (H.R. 4454) making

JUNE 29, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darrant Gordon, Appellant.

[655 NYS2d 61]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered May 25, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the court properly admitted into evidence, on the People’s rebuttal case, the testimony of a forensic psychiatrist, who recounted certain out-of-court statements made to him by the defendant’s cousin. Inasmuch as the cousin’s statements formed a basis of the expert’s professional opinion, the testimony was permissibly received into evidence *(see,*CPL 60.55 [1]; *see also, People v Rudd,*196 AD2d 666, 667). Moreover, since the defendant had knowledge of the statements, they did not constitute *Brady*material *(see, People v Rodriguez,*223 AD2d 605, 606; *People v Buxton,*189 AD2d 996, 997; *see also, People v Fein,*18 NY2d 162).

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of his right to be present at a material stage of the trial is without merit *(see, People v Velasco,*77 NY2d 469; *People v Patti,*229 AD2d 506; *People v Miranda,*213 AD2d 560).

*377The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental *pro se*brief, are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.
#### Howard Hoak GEER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1032.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 29, 1967.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Richard H. Cooper, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
| (1)  | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                       |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|      |                                                                                                                                                    |
| (2)  | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. |

| August 2, 2010                              |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                        |   |
|                                        |   |
| /s/ Michael A. Neal                         |   |
| Michael A. NealChief Executive Officer      |   |
|                                        |   |
| /s/ Jeffrey S. Bornstein                    |   |
| Jeffrey S. BornsteinChief Financial Officer |   |
# C_2023216EN.01001501.xml

| 19.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB) v BB

(Case C-681/21, (1) BVAEB (Amount of the retirement pension))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Directive 2000/78/EC - Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age - Retirement pension - National legislation providing, with retroactive effect, for a category of civil servants previously advantaged by the national legislation relating to retirement pension rights to be treated in the same way as a category of civil servants previously disadvantaged by that legislation)

(2023/C 216/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB)

Respondent: BB

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1) and (2)(a) and Article 6(1) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation

must be interpreted as precluding, in the absence of an overriding reason in the public interest, national legislation which, in order to end discrimination on grounds of age, provides for the retirement pension scheme for a category of civil servants previously advantaged by the national legislation relating to retirement pension rights to be treated, with retroactive effect, in the same way as the retirement pension scheme for the category of civil servants previously disadvantaged by that legislation.

---

(1)  OJ C 84, 21.2.2022.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30489 Conference Calendar

DONALD BOURQUE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus PHILLIP BLANCHARD, Etc., Et Al.; Defendants,

PHILLIP BLANCHARD, d/b/a B & C BOAT RENTAL, INC; and M/V JOHN B, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-1598

- - - - - - - - - - June 16, 1998 Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Donald Bourque, a seaman on the M/V JOHN B, operated by Phillip Blanchard d/b/a B & C Boat Rental, Inc., was injured while descending the stairs. Bourque argues that the jury’s verdict is unsupported by the evidence. Bourque failed to move for a judgment as a matter ofNo. 97-30489 -2- law at the close of all the evidence. Nor did he move for a judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial following the return of the verdict. Thus, our review is limited to whether there was any evidence to support the jury’s verdict, irrespective of its sufficiency, or whether plain error was committed. Coughlin v. Capitol Cement Co. , 571 F.2d 290, 297 (5th Cir. 1978). Bourque’s testimony was inconsistent as to whether his fall occurred at the top of the stairs where there was no handrail or on the middle steps where a handrail was provided. The jury could have concluded that Bourque fell in the middle of the stairs and that any failure to provide a left side handrail at the top of the stairs, even if unseaworthy or negligent, did not cause his injury. See Guillory v. Domtar Indus. Inc. , 95 F.3d 1320, 1333-34 (5th Cir. 1996)(this court accepts all credibility choices that tend to support the verdict). This appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. Howard V. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
IV

House Calendar No. 174

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 455

[Report No. 103–548]

Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 4554) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 15, 1994

Mr. DERRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 4554)

making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September 30,

1995, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That during consideration of the bill (H.R.

2 4554) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural De3 velopment, Food and Drug Administration, and Related

4 Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September

5 30, 1995, and for other purposes, points of order against
2

HRES 455 RH

1 the following provisions in the bill for failure to comply

2 with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived: beginning on page

3 26, line 3, through line 8; beginning with ‘‘$30,000,000’’

4 on page 42, line 16, through ‘‘housing;’’ on line 17; begin5 ning with ‘‘section’’ on page 43, line 1, through

6 ‘‘$15,750,000’’ on line 2; beginning with ‘‘Provided’’ on

7 page 46, line 5, through ‘‘1993’’ on line 12; beginning with

8 ‘‘Provided’’ on page 46, line 19, through ‘‘1993’’ on page

9 47, line 2; beginning with ‘‘Provided’’ on page 47, line 14,

10 through ‘‘$10,565,000’’ on line 20; beginning with ‘‘of

11 which’’ on page 48, line 5, through ‘‘1993’’ on line 9; the

12 phrase ‘‘the foregoing $19,047,000’’ on page 48, line 13;

13 beginning with ‘‘of which’’ on page 50, line 10, through

14 ‘‘1993’’ on line 14; beginning on page 57, line 1, through

15 ‘‘(7 U.S.C. 612c)’’ on line 12; beginning on page 58, line

16 23, through line 25; beginning on page 59, line 16,

17 through page 60, line 5; beginning on page 69, line 1,

18 through line 6; and beginning on page 70, line 20, through

19 page 71, line 8.

House Calendar No. 774

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 455

[Report No. 103–548]

RESOLUTION

Waiving certain points of order against the bill

for other purposes.the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, andministration, and Related Agencies programs forculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Ad-(H.R. 4554) making appropriations for AgriJUNE 15, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-KSB  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          2,876
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          1,215
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    54,369
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          1,681
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                       109,777
<ALLOWANCE>                                       512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                176,786
<DEPOSITS>                                     79,948
<SHORT-TERM>                                   83,166
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               986
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           94
<OTHER-SE>                                     12,592
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                176,786
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 8,660
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               3,001
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  328
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               11,989
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              3,205
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              7,117
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           4,871
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     205
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (66)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 2,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,217
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      2,217
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,560
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.67
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.15
<LOANS-NON>                                       719
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 2,406
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  443
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     138
<RECOVERIES>                                        2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 512
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              512
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
#### Lesley WINSTON, Appellant, v. Sylvia WINSTON and Winston Insurance Associates, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 73-1385.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 6, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### SOUTHEAST TITLE AND INSURANCE COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. William THOMPSON, Jr., Irene Thompson, Sharon Thompson, a minor, by her next friend, William Thompson, and William Thompson, Appellees.

No. 69-176.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 3, 1970.

Preddy, Haddad, Kutner *&*Hardy, Miami, for appellant.

Caidin, Rothenberg, Kogan & Kornblum and Arthur Rothenberg, Miami, for appel-lee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and SWANN, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on June 24, 1969 (224 So.2d 718) affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed January 28, 1970 (231 So.2d 201) and mandate dated February 13, 1970, reversed this court’s judgment of affirmance and remanded the cause for disposition not inconsistent with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida;

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this *870cause on July 10, 1969 is withdrawn, the majority opinion and judgment of this court filed June 24, 1969 is vacated, the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the partial summary judgment on liability of the circuit court appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16(b) Florida Appellate Rules), 32 F.S.A.