Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2018
                              Dr. Robert Kanowitz, DAB CR5215 (2018)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Dr. Robert Kanowitz, DAB CR5215 (2018)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Dr. Robert Kanowitz
	(NPI: 1205866464)
	Petitioner,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-18-968Decision No. CR5215November 20, 2018

        
              
    

      DECISION
Petitioner, Dr. Robert Kanowitz, is a podiatrist, licensed to practice in Pennsylvania.  He participated in the Medicare program until July 19, 2012, when the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services (IG) excluded him from participating in federal health care programs.  The IG took this action because Petitioner Kanowitz was convicted of criminal offenses related to the delivery of an item or service under a state health care program.  Petitioner recently reapplied for program enrollment but, because of his felony convictions, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) denied his application.  Petitioner now appeals the denial.
I find that CMS is authorized to deny Petitioner Kanowitz’s reenrollment application because, within the ten years preceding his filing, he was convicted of felonies that CMS reasonably determined are detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries.  I therefore affirm CMS’s determination.
Background
By letter dated March 9, 2018, the Medicare contractor, Novitas Solutions, denied Petitioner Kanowitz’s application for enrollment in the Medicare program.  CMS Ex. 2.
Page 2
The contractor acted pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(3) because Petitioner was convicted of felonies that CMS determined are detrimental to the best interests of the program and its beneficiaries.  CMS Ex. 2 at 1.
Petitioner requested reconsideration.  In a revised reconsidered determination, dated May 25, 2018 (which amended a May 8, 2018 determination), a CMS hearing officer upheld the denial, citing Petitioner’s felony convictions for theft by deception – false impression (18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3922(a)(1)) and submitting claims for services not rendered (62 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 1407(a)(9)).  CMS Ex. 15.  Petitioner timely appealed, and that appeal is now before me.
CMS moves for summary judgment, which Petitioner opposes.  Because neither party proposes any witnesses, an in-person hearing would serve no purpose.  *See* Acknowledgment and Pre-hearing Order at 5-6 (¶¶ 8, 9, 10).  The matter may therefore be decided based on the written record, without considering whether the standards for summary judgment are satisfied.
CMS has submitted its brief (CMS Br.) and sixteen exhibits (CMS Exs. 1-16).1
  Petitioner has submitted his brief and fourteen exhibits (P. Exs. 3-13, 13a, 14, and 15).2
 In the absence of any objections, I admit into evidence CMS Exs. 1-16 and P. Exs. 3-6 and 15.
Discussion
***CMS may deny Petitioner enrollment in the Medicare program because, within the last ten years, he was convicted of felonies that CMS reasonably finds detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries.3***
*Statute and regulations*.  CMS may deny a provider’s or supplier’s enrollment in the Medicare program if, within the preceding ten years, he was convicted of a felony offense that CMS “has determined to be detrimental to the best interests of the program and its beneficiaries.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(3); *see also* Social Security Act (Act) §§ 1842(h)(8) (authorizing the Secretary to deny enrollment to a physician who has been convicted of a felony offense that the Secretary has determined is “detrimental to the best
Page 3
interests of the program or program beneficiaries”) and 1866(b)(2)(D) (authorizing the Secretary to deny enrollment after he ascertains that the provider has been convicted of a felony that he “determines is detrimental to the best interests of the program or program beneficiaries”).
Offenses for which billing privileges may be denied include – but are not limited to –financial crimes such as extortion, embezzlement, income tax evasion, insurance fraud, and similar crimes; a felony that places the Medicare program or its beneficiaries at immediate risk (such as malpractice); and felonies “outlined in section 1128 of the Act.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.530(a)(3)(i)(B), (D).  Section 1128 crimes include:  *program-related crimes*; crimes related to the neglect or abuse of patients in connection with the delivery of a healthcare item or service; crimes relating to health care fraud; and crimes relating to the unlawful manufacture, distribution, prescription, or dispensing of a controlled substance.  *See* 42 C.F.R. § 1001.101.
*Petitioner’s felony offenses*.  Petitioner Kanowitz was charged in Pennsylvania state court with multiple felony counts:  receiving stolen property; theft by deception – false impression; submitting false/fraudulent medical assistance claims; submitting claims for services not rendered; and submitting claims with false information.  CMS Ex. 5 at 2.  On November 22, 2010, he pled *nolo contendere* and was convicted on two felony counts:  theft by deception, in violation of 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3922(a)(1); and submitting claims for services not rendered by the provider, in violation of 62 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 1407(a)(9).  CMS Ex. 5 at 2-3.
Because of these convictions, the IG excluded him from participating in all federal health care programs for a minimum period of five years.  CMS Ex. 6.  Section 1128(a)(1) of the Act mandates that the IG exclude an individual who has been convicted of a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or a state health care program.
The five years passed, and Petitioner requested reinstatement.  In a letter dated August 11, 2017, the IG approved his request and recommended that he contact his Medicare contractor to determine his options for participating in that program.  CMS Ex. 7.
*Petitioner’s reenrollment application*.  In an application filed on November 22, 2017, Petitioner applied for reenrollment in the Medicare program.  CMS Ex. 4.  He disclosed his criminal convictions and the exclusion but told the contractor that he had been reinstated, his medical license had never been “taken away,” and Highmark Blue Shield had granted him preferred provider status.  CMS Ex. 4 at 8.  Pointing to these factors, along with his acceptance by other insurers and his veracity on the application form, Petitioner maintains that his Medicare enrollment should be allowed.
Page 4
Exclusion under section 1128 and denial of enrollment under 42 C.F.R. § 424.530 (as authorized by sections 1842(h)(8) and 1866(b)(2)(D) of the Act) are separate and distinct enforcement tools, each with its own requirements and consequences.  *See Fady Fayad, M.D.*, DAB No. 2266 at 12 (2009), *citing Abdul Razzaque Ahmed, M.D.*, DAB No. 2261 at 13 (2009).  That the IG may have imposed a minimum period of exclusion does not preclude CMS from making its own, independent determination regarding a supplier’s reenrollment.  Indeed, the statute and regulations mandate that it do so.
Citing a series of ALJ decisions, Petitioner favorably compares his own criminal activity to that of others denied enrollment based on felony convictions.  But my review authority here is limited.  I may determine whether the regulatory elements required for denial of enrollment under section 424.530(a) are present, and, if the record establishes that they are, I must affirm.  *See Douglas Bradley, M.D.*, DAB No. 2663 at 6-7, 13-14 (2015) and cases cited therein.  By regulation, Petitioner’s felony offenses *are* detrimental to the best interests of the program and its beneficiaries.  Not only were his offenses “financial crimes,” similar to insurance fraud, they subjected him to exclusion under section 1128(a).  Because Petitioner’s convictions were among those specifically enumerated in section 424.530(a), CMS may deny his Medicare enrollment without regard to equitable or other factors.  *See Fayad*, DAB No. 2266 at 15-17.
Thus, CMS justifiably determined that Petitioner was convicted of felonies that are detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries and may deny his enrollment in the Medicare program.
Conclusion
CMS may deny Petitioner Kanowitz’s Medicare enrollment application because he was convicted of felonies that CMS reasonably determined are detrimental to the best interests of the Medicare program and its beneficiaries.  I therefore affirm CMS’s determination.


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. In its exhibit list, CMS lists seventeen exhibits but it submitted only sixteen. back to note 1
                      2. Petitioner marked as exhibits some documents that are not exhibits. His brief and his exhibit list are marked as P. Exs. 1 and 2. P. Exs. 7-13, 13a, and 14 are decisions by administrative law judges, which need not be admitted as exhibits. back to note 2
                      3. I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law to support my decision. back to note 3 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back