Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2020
                              Dave R. Pinakin d/b/a A-One Grocery / Corner Cupboard, DAB TB5204 (2020)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Dave R. Pinakin d/b/a A-One Grocery / Corner Cupboard, DAB TB5204 (2020)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Center for Tobacco Products,
	Complainant,
v.
Dave R. Pinakin
	d/b/a A-One Grocery / Corner Cupboard,
	Respondent.
Docket No. T-20-924FDA Docket No. FDA-2019-H-5684Decision No. TB5204July 30, 2020

        
              
    

      INITIAL DECISION AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT
The Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) began this matter by serving an administrative complaint on Respondent, Dave R. Pinakin d/b/a A-One Grocery / Corner Cupboard, at 162 Willow Street, Waterbury, Connecticut 06710, and by filing a copy of the complaint with the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Division of Dockets Management.  The complaint alleges that Respondent opened packages of cigarettes intended for the sale of individual cigarettes, thereby violating the Act and its implementing regulations at 21 C.F.R. pt. 1140.  The complaint also alleges that CTP previously initiated a civil penalty action against Respondent.  The prior action concluded after an Initial Decision and Default Judgment was entered against Respondent A-One Grocery / Corner Cupboard for at least three violations of the Act.  Therefore, CTP seeks a $2,282 civil money penalty against Respondent A-One Grocery / Corner Cupboard for a total of four violations within a 24-month period.
Respondent timely answered CTP’s complaint; however during the course of these administrative proceedings, Respondent failed to comply with judicial orders and
Page 2
procedures governing this proceeding and failed to defend its actions, which interfered with the speedy, orderly, or fair conduct of this proceeding.  21 C.F.R. § 17.35(a).  Accordingly, pursuant to 21 C.F.R. § 17.35(c)(3), I strike Respondent’s answer and issue this decision of default judgment.
I.  Background and Procedural History
As provided for in 21 C.F.R. §§ 17.5 and 17.7, on December 9, 2019, CTP served the complaint on Respondent A-One Grocery / Corner Cupboard by United Parcel Service.  On January 7, 2020, Respondent timely filed an answer.  On January 16, 2020, I issued an Acknowledgment and Pre-Hearing Order (APHO) acknowledging receipt of Respondent’s answer and establishing procedural deadlines for this case.  On February 18, 2020, CTP filed its Notice of Appearance and a Status Report.  In the Status Report, CTP stated that “[t]he parties have been unable to reach a settlement in this case.”
On March 18, 2020, CTP filed an Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadlines and Notice of Pending Settlement.  On March 20, 2020, I issued an Order Granting Motion to Extend Deadlines, which extended the deadline for CTP’s pre-hearing exchange to May 6, 2020, and Respondent’s pre-hearing exchange to May 27, 2020.  On April 20, 2020, CTP filed its second Motion to Extend Deadlines.  CTP asserted that it had received payment from Respondent, but had experienced delays in finalizing the settlement agreement with Respondent.  On April 21, 2020, I granted CTP’s motion and issued an order which extended the deadline for CTP’s pre-hearing exchange to May 21, 2020.  I noted that the deadline for Respondent’s pre-hearing exchange would remain as May 27, 2020.
On May 21, 2020, CTP filed its Informal Brief, Complainant’s List of Proposed Witnesses and Exhibits, and twelve exhibits (CTP Exs. 1-12).  To date, Respondent has not filed a pre-hearing exchange.
On June 1, 2020, I issued an Order Scheduling Pre-Hearing Conference setting a telephone pre-hearing conference for June 10, 2020, at 11:00 AM Eastern Time.  *See* 21 C.F.R. § 17.21(a), (c).  The parties were directed to call in to the conference using the telephone number and passcode provided in the June 1, 2020 Order.  The June 1, 2020 Order was served on Respondent via DAB E-File.  *See* June 1, 2020 Order, at 3.
On June 10, 2020, I held a pre-hearing conference.  Representatives for CTP appeared on the call, but Respondent neither appeared at the pre-hearing conference call nor provided any response to the June 1, 2020 Order.
On June 11, 2020, I issued an Order to Show Cause directing Respondent by June 18, 2020, to show cause for its failure to comply with my June 1, 2020, Order.  I warned Respondent that failure to show cause may result in sanctions including the issuance of a default judgment finding Respondent liable for the violations listed in the Complaint and
Page 3
imposing a civil money penalty.  The June 11, 2020, Order was served on Respondent via DAB E-File.  *See* June 11, 2020, Order, at 3.  Respondent did not respond to the June 11, 2020, Order to Show Cause for its failure to comply with the June 1, 2020, Order.
II.  Sanctions
The regulations authorize me to impose sanctions on any party for:
(1) Failing to comply with an order, subpoena, rule, or procedure governing the proceeding;
	(2) Failing to prosecute or defend an action; or
	(3) Engaging in other misconduct that interferes with the speedy, orderly, or fair conduct of the hearing.
21 C.F.R. § 17.35(a).  Any sanction “shall reasonably relate to the severity and nature of the failure or misconduct.”  21 C.F.R. § 17.35(b).
I conclude that sanctions against Respondent are warranted.  During the course of this administrative proceeding, Respondent repeatedly failed to comply with orders and procedures governing this proceeding and failed to defend its action.  21 C.F.R. § 17.35(a)(1), (2).  Specifically, Respondent failed to appear at the pre-hearing conference call as scheduled by the June 1, 2020, Order.  *See*21 C.F.R. § 17.21(a), (c).  Respondent had notice of the pre-hearing conference scheduled for June 10, 2020, yet failed to call in.  Respondent’s failure to appear for the pre-hearing conference call is compounded by its failure to comply with my June 11, 2020, Order, which afforded Respondent until June 18, 2020, to show cause for its failure to comply with my June 1, 2020, Order to appear at the pre-hearing conference.  The June 11, 2020, Order also cautioned that Respondent’s failure to do so may result in sanctions including the issuance of a default judgment against Respondent and imposing a civil money penalty.  Despite this clear warning, Respondent still failed to respond to the June 11, 2020, Order to Show Cause.
In the absence of any explanation from Respondent, I find no basis to excuse Respondent’s repeated failure to comply with the judicial orders in this proceeding.  Respondent did not comply with two orders and procedures governing this proceeding.  *See*June 1, 2020 Order; June 11, 2020 Order; *see also*21 C.F.R. § 17.35(a)(1).  Respondent’s failure to appear at the pre-hearing conference call and failure to show cause suggest that it has abandoned its defense of this case.  21 C.F.R. § 17.35(a)(2).  Accordingly, I find that Respondent failed to comply with orders and procedures governing this proceeding and failed to defend its action, thereby authorizing the imposition of sanctions under the provisions of 21 C.F.R. § 17.35(a).
Page 4
The harshness of the sanctions I impose must relate to the nature and severity of the misconduct or failure to comply.  21 C.F.R. § 17.35(b).  I find that Respondent’s actions are sufficient to warrant striking its answer and issuing a decision by default, without further proceedings.  *Id.*As the Departmental Appeals Board has recognized in a similar case involving a party’s failure to comply with judicial orders, this conduct is sufficiently egregious to warrant striking Respondent’s answer and issuing an initial decision by default.  *Joshua Ranjit Inc. d/b/a 7-Eleven 10326*, DAB No. 2758 (2017)(concluding that “the ALJ acted within his authority under the regulations and did not abuse his discretion in striking Respondent’s Answer as a sanction for Respondent’s failure to respond to the ALJ’s orders.”); *see KKNJ, Inc. d/b/a Tobacco Hut 12*, DAB No. 2678, at 10 (2016)(concluding that “the ALJ did not abuse her discretion in sanctioning Respondent’s ongoing failure to comply with the ALJ’s directions by striking Respondent’s answer to the Complaint”); *see also Action Convenience Service Inc. d/b/a Marathon 113*, CRD No. TB2472 (2018) (striking Respondent’s filings and issuing a default judgment as a sanction for Respondent’s failure to appear at the pre-hearing conference call, failure to show cause, and failure to participate in the hearing process); *Whistlin’ Jack Lodge, Inc. d/b/a Whistlin’ Jack Lodge*, CRD No. TB1715 (2017) (striking Respondent’s answer and issuing a default judgment as a sanction for Respondent’s failure to appear at two scheduled pre-hearing conferences).  Therefore, pursuant to 21 C.F.R. § 17.35(a) and (b), I strike Respondent’s answer for failing to comply with judicial orders and procedures governing this proceeding and for failing to defend its action, which interfered with the speedy, orderly, or fair conduct of this proceeding.
III.  Default Decision
Striking Respondent’s answer leaves the complaint unanswered.  Pursuant to 21 C.F.R. § 17.11, I assume that the facts alleged in the complaint (but not its conclusory statements) are true.  Specifically:
On May 6, 2019, CTP initiated a previous civil money penalty action, CRD Docket Number T-19-2754, FDA Docket Number FDA-2019-H-2135, against Respondent for at least three1
 violations of the Act.  CTP alleged those violations to have occurred at Respondent’s business establishment, 162 Willow Street, Waterbury, Connecticut 06710, on March 12, 2018, and February 9, 2019;Page 5
The previous action concluded when an Initial Decision and Default Judgment was entered by an Administrative Law Judge, “finding that all of the violations alleged in the Complaint occurred”;
	An FDA-commissioned inspector conducted a subsequent inspection on September 11, 2019, at Respondent’s business establishment located at 162 Willow Street, Waterbury, Connecticut 06710.  During this inspection, the inspector observed a box of individual Newport cigarettes behind the sales counter in the establishment.  Additionally, Respondent’s employee stated to the inspector that the establishment sells individual cigarettes.These facts establish Respondent A-One Grocery / Corner Cupboard’s liability under the Act.  The Act prohibits misbranding of a regulated tobacco product.  21 U.S.C. § 331(k).  A regulated tobacco product is misbranded if sold or distributed in violation of regulations issued under section 906(d) of the Act.  21 U.S.C. § 387f(d); *see also*21 U.S.C. § 387c(a)(7)(B); 21 C.F.R. § 1140.1(b).  The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued the regulations at 21 C.F.R. pt. 1140 under section 906(d) of the Act.  21 U.S.C. § 387a-1; *see also* 21 U.S.C. § 387f(d)(1); 75 Fed. Reg. 13,225, 13,229 (Mar. 19, 2010); 81 Fed. Reg. 28,974, 28,975-76 (May 10, 2016).  Under 21 C.F.R. § 1140.14(b)(1), no retailer may sell regulated tobacco products to any person younger than 18 years of age.  Under 21 C.F.R. § 1140.14(b)(2)(i), retailers must verify, by means of photographic identification containing a purchaser’s date of birth, that no regulated tobacco product purchasers are younger than 18 years of age.  Under 21 C.F.R. § 1140.14(a)(4), no retailer may break or otherwise open any cigarette package to sell individual cigarettes.
	Under 21 C.F.R. § 17.2, a $2,282 civil money penalty is permissible for four violations of the regulations found at 21 C.F.R. pt. 1140 within a 24-month period.
Order
For these reasons, I enter default judgment in the amount of $2,282 against Respondent Dave R. Pinakin d/b/a A-One Grocery / Corner Cupboard.  Pursuant to 21 C.F.R. § 17.11(b), this order becomes final and binding upon both parties after 30 days of the date of its issuance.


          /s/
        Catherine Ravinski

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. The complaint alleges two violations were committed on March 12, 2018, and two on February 9, 2019.  In accordance with customary practice, CTP counted the violations at the initial inspection as a single violation, and all subsequent violations as separate individual violations.  See Orton Motor, Inc. d/b/a Orton’s Bagley v. U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Serv., 884 F.3d 1205 (D.C. Cir. 2018). back to note 1 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back