alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smithway Motor Xpress Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G.
Larry Owens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

                                               /s/ G. Larry Owens
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              G. Larry Owens
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              March 16, 2005
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, WayneG. Wetherell, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-KSB of ImageWare Systems, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.               The small business issuer’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

 

(a)          designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

 

(b)         [Reserved]

 

(c)          evaluated the effectiveness of the small businessissuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

(d)         disclosed in this report any change in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The small business issuer’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)          all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: | May 20, 2004 |                    | /s/ Wayne G. Wetherell |
|--------|--------------|-------------------------|------------------------|
|   |         | Wayne G. Wetherell      |
|   |         | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Anna KAPLOWITZ, Appellant, v. Ruth WEISS and Ralph Kaplowitz, Appellees.

No. 72-1144.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 8, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 12

GTE Southwest Incorporated

STATEMENT OF THE RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Six Months Ended
                                                                   June 30, 1997
                                                                  ----------------
<S>                                                                <C>
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income from continuing operations                                $151,230
  Add - Income taxes                                                 77,666
       - Fixed charges                                               31,343
                                                                   --------
Adjusted earnings                                                  $260,239
                                                                   ========
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                                 $ 29,630
  Portion of rent expense
     representing interest                                            1,713
                                                                   --------
Adjusted fixed charges                                             $ 31,343
                                                                   ========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                     8.30
</TABLE>
#### Janvier C. KNIGHT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-193.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 7, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2023164EN.01000601.xml

| 8.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Colt Technology Services SpA and Others v Ministero della Giustizia and Others

(Case C-339/21, (1) Colt Technology Services and Others)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Electronic communications networks and services - Directive (EU) 2018/1972 - Article 13 - Conditions attached to the general authorisation - Annex I, Part A, point 4 - Enabling of legal interception by competent national authorities - Article 3 - General objectives - National legislation on the reimbursement of costs associated with interception activities that telecommunications operators are ordered by the judicial authorities to carry out - Absence of full reimbursement mechanism - Principles of non-discrimination, proportionality and transparency)

(2023/C 164/07)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Colt Technology Services SpA, Wind Tre SpA, Telecom Italia SpA, Vodafone Italia SpA, Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Procura Generale della Repubblica presso la Corte d’appello di Reggio Calabria, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Cagliari, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Roma

Defendants: Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Procura Generale della Repubblica presso la Corte d’appello di Reggio Calabria, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Cagliari, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Roma, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Locri, Wind Tre SpA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13, read in the light of Article 3 of Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code, and point 4 of Part A of Annex I to that directive, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which does not require full reimbursement of the costs actually incurred by providers of electronic communications services when they enable the legal interception of electronic communications by the competent national authorities, provided that that legislation is non-discriminatory, proportionate and transparent.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-05-1995
<CASH>                                          26,431
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    143,739
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,353
<PP&E>                                         398,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                 157,087
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 454,009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          156,293
<BONDS>                                        176,359
<COMMON>                                        31,752
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   454,009
<SALES>                                        424,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               427,243
<CGS>                                          309,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  309,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,486)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (706)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,780)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (2,793)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,573)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2020087EN.01002901.xml

| 16.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 87/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 87/29

---

Action brought on 3 February 2020 — Group v EUIPO — Iliev (GROUP Company TOURISM & TRAVEL)

(Case T-57/20)

(2020/C 87/35)

Language in which the application was lodged: Bulgarian

Parties

Applicant: Group EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: D. Dragiev and A. Andreev, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kosta Iliev (Sofia, Bulgaria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark ‘GROUP Company TOURISM & TRAVEL’ in the colours purple, grey, black, violet, orange, red, and yellow — Application for registration No 10 640 449

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 November 2019 in Case R 2059/2018-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO, and the intervener, if any, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO, and the intervener, if any, to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Order entered January 9, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00845-CR

CARLOS NAVARRO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-59312-X

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the clerk’s and reporter’s records because of ineffective counsel, indigence, 

or for any other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the clerk’s and reporter’s records. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment 

of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is 

indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to 

assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the 

trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has 

abandoned the appeal.
 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

 The trial court shall next determine the date by which the clerk’s record will be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written 

findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY 

DAYS of the date of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be 

reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
From: Christopher Bolduc [mailto:cabolduc@lbl.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 10:23 PM

To: Richard Parker

Cc: rick.anderson@faypwc.com; tballo@earthjustice.org; ScottB@lvmetals.com;

john.caskey@nema.org; jerry.corkran@cooperindustries.com;

john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov; adelaski@standardsasap.org; Teckman@nwcouncil.org;

gbf1@pge.com; carlos.gaytan@ge.com; rgreeson@federalpacific.com;

bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com; jhodge@howard.com; mhyland@appanet.org;

dave.millure@metglas.com; snadel@aceee.org; wes.patterson@us.abb.com;

Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com; Raymond.Polinski@atimetals.com;

artrosenfeld@gmail.com; srosenstock@eei.org; rroy@nrdc.org;

robert.saint@nreca.coop; chuck.simmons@pgnmail.com; BermanEconomics@gmail.com;

Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; greg.coulter405@gmail.com; Jim.creevy@nema.org;

ahofmann@publicpower.org; pkumar@publicpower.org; jmauer@standardsasap.org;

Aaron.Meyers@cooperindustries.com; jrossetti@mlgw.org; Paul.Ryan@hitmet.com;

jerry.schoen@aksteel.com; bsmith@federalpacific.com; mwal tner@nrdc.org;

kwinder@mleainc.com; cabolduc@lbl.gov; Brian Coffey; kcoughlin@lbl.gov;

brenda.edwards@ee.doe.gov; jeremiah.freeman@ee.doe.gov; Caitlin Johnson; Zhimei

Luo; emily.marchetti@ee.doe.gov; Michael Rivest; gjrosenquist@lbl.gov;

charlied@uus.org; phopkinson@hvolt.com; James.Lass@cleco.com;

maheshsampat@bellsouth.net; DYoung@energy

‐ solution.com;

chad.kennedy@us.schneider

‐ electric.com; eduardorobles@eaton.com;

vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com; thomas.patzner@us.schneider

‐ electric.com;

carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.com; Raba, Jim

Subject: MV Liquid

‐ immersed LCC and NIA Results

Dear Committee Members,

Please find the draft LCC and NIA results for l iquid

‐ immersed medium

‐ voltage

transformers (design lines 1

‐ 5) attached.

A summary of changes and additional sensitivities will be distributed before next

week's meeting.

Thank you,

‐‐ Chris Bolduc

‐‐‐‐

Chris Bolduc

Energy Efficiency Standards Group

Environmental Energy Technologies Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

t. 416

‐ 535

‐ 7546 c. 647

‐ 832

‐ 402 1
---




Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





|Th | e Board of Directors
|-- | --------------------

|Ga | rden Fresh Restaurant Corp.
|-- | ---------------------------




We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 33-93568, No. 333-57615, No. 333-93359 and No. 333-48440) on Form S-8 of Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp.
of our report dated November 8, 2001, except as to Note 3, which is as of December 3, 2001, relating to the balance sheets of Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp. as of September 30, 2000 and 2001, and the related statements of operations,
shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended September 30, 2001, which report appears in the September 30, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K of Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp.





| | /s/ | KPMG LLP
| | --- | --------




|San | Diego, California
|--- | -----------------

|De | cember 27, 2001
|-- | ---------------
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 506 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 204

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 506

                          [Report No. 103-659]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 3474) to reduce administrative requirements for insured 
 depository institutions to the extent consistent with safe and sound 
    banking practices, to facilitate the establishment of community 
      development financial institutions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 3, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                 House Calendar No. 204
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 506

                          [Report No. 103-659]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 3474) to reduce administrative requirements for insured 
 depository institutions to the extent consistent with safe and sound 
    banking practices, to facilitate the establishment of community 
      development financial institutions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 3, 1994

  Mr. Beilenson, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 3474) to reduce administrative requirements for insured 
 depository institutions to the extent consistent with safe and sound 
    banking practices, to facilitate the establishment of community 
      development financial institutions, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
3474) to reduce administrative requirements for insured depository 
institutions to the extent consistent with safe and sound banking 
practices, to facilitate the establishment of community development 
financial institutions, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read.
```
# C_2021035EN.01005701.xml

| 1.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/57

---

Action brought on 3 December 2020 — Škoda Investement v EUIPO — Škoda Auto (Device of arrow with wing)

(Case T-712/20)

(2021/C 35/75)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Škoda Investement a.s. (Plzeň, Czech Republic) (represented by: L. Lorenc, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Škoda Auto a.s. (Mladá Boleslav, Czech Republic)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark (Representation of a device of arrow with wing) — Application for registration No 17 991 861

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 October 2020 in Case R 284/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 9 December 2019 concerning Opposition No B003083007 to the full extent; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 9 December 2019 concerning Opposition No B003083007 to the full extent;

| — | remit the case to the Opposition Division for further examination with respect to all goods and services applied for; |
| --- | --- |

—

remit the case to the Opposition Division for further examination with respect to all goods and services applied for;

| — | order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Incorrect assessment of the legal effects of a procedurally illegal first-instance decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

Incorrect assessment of the legal effects of a procedurally illegal first-instance decision.

---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-1335

_____________________________

TRAVIS THURSTON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—

Original Jurisdiction.

July 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate 

counsel is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Travis Thurston, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.