alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
GENOVESE DRUG STORES, INC.

Exhibit 11

STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   Twelve Weeks Ended           Forty Weeks Ended
                                -------------------------   -------------------------
                                November 8,  November 10,   November 8,  November 10,
                                   1996          1995          1996          1995
                                -----------  ------------   -----------  ------------
<S>                               <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>    
Primary:

Weighted average shares
 outstanding (A)                   11,121        11,085        11,110        11,084

Equivalent shares--
 dilutive stock options (B)            --            --            --            --
                                  -------       -------       -------       -------
                                   11,121        11,085        11,110        11,084
                                  -------       -------       -------       -------

Net income                        $ 2,351       $ 1,788       $ 5,452       $ 4,604
                                  -------       -------       -------       -------

Net income per common
  share (A)                       $   .21       $   .16       $   .49       $   .42
                                  =======       =======       =======       =======
</TABLE>


(A)  Adjusted, where appropriate, to reflect the effect of the 10 percent stock
     dividend distributed on January 4, 1996.

(B)  The effect of equivalent shares of dilutive stock options is not
     significant to net income per common share for any period presented.

There is no significant difference between primary and fully diluted net income
per common share.




                                       -9-
#### E. C. LUNSFORD, Appellant, v. H. K. TERRY, Appellee.

No. 71-1351.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 13, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
### FAA-110930-023

U
. S. D epartme n t of Transportat i o n Federal Aviation Administration 

## OCT 2 0 . 2011 Ms. Gale A. Brewer Counci l Member, District 6 The Council of The City ofNew York 563 Columbus Avenue at 87th Street New York, NY 10024 Dear Ms. Brewer : 800 Indepe n dence Ave
., SW
. Washington, DC 2059 1

Administrator Babbitt asked me to respond to your letter of September 26 concerning your petition for rulemaking regarding the placement of registration numbers on helicopters. We appreciate your effort to submit a petition for rulemaking , however, the petition is incomplete
. T o consider the petition we need a more complete explanation of your proposed action and its purpose. You should propose the language for a new or amended rule , or the language you would remove from the current rule
. Most important, as the proponent for a change in the regulations , you n eed to provide an explanation of why your proposed action would be in the p ublic interest, along with information and arguments that support your proposed act ion, including relevant technical and scientific data. These requirements are set out in our rules and we have also enclosed a copy of 14 CFR 

### § 11
. 71 for your informa t ion. Your letter has been added to Docket No. FAA-2011-1030
. P leas e provide the additional information within 30 days of r e ceipt of this letter so that we can proces s your petition as quickly as possible. If you have any quest ions or concerns or need additional time, please contact Frances Shaver, Office ofRulemaking, at 202-26 7- 4059. Sincerely,

# ~~~ Margaret Gilligan Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety Enclosure
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Pasquale A. Ambrogio, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the second quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (“Quarterly Report”) of GIANT GROUP, LTD.(“Company” or “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this Quarterly Report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for the periods presented in thisQuarterly Report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I amresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Company is made known to us during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period ended of June 30, 2003 covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theCompany’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Company’s independent auditor and the Audit committee of the Board of Directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 14, 2003 

 

/s/    PASQUALE A. AMBROGIO

----
EXHIBIT 23


<PAGE>
                           [LOGO] ATKINSON & CO. LTD.
                   CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS - CONSULTANTS



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement of
GFSB  Bancorp,  Inc.  on Form  S-8  (filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on June  28,  1996)  of our  report  dated  August  11,  1997 on the
consolidated  financials  statements  of GFSB  Bancorp,  Inc.,  included in this
Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of GFSB  Bancorp,  Inc.  for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 1997.



                                             /s/Atkinson & Co., Ltd.
                                             Atkinson & Co., Ltd.



Albuquerque, New Mexico
September 29, 1997



                 Telephone (505) 843-6492 - Fax (505) 843-6817
               707 Broadway NE, Suite 400 Albuquerque, NM 87102 -
                      PO Box 25246, Albuquerque, NM 87125
[LOGO] Member                                          [LOGO AAFI] ASSOCIATED
       -------------                                               ACCOUNTING
       Division for CPA Firms AICPA                                FIRMS
                                                                   INTERNATIONAL
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 30923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14189]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army, Army Corps of Engineers


Notice of Solicitation of Applications for Stakeholder 
Representative Members of the Missouri River Recovery Implementation 
Committee; Correction

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice; extension of application deadline; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Army Corps of Engineers published a document in the 
Federal Register of June 4, 2018, soliciting applications to fill 
vacant stakeholder representative member positions on the Missouri 
River Recovery Implementation Committee (MRRIC). The document contained 
an incomplete list of stakeholder interest categories. There are three 
additional stakeholder interest categories. The Corps is also extending 
the deadline for submitting applications to August 2, 2018.

DATES: The agency must receive completed applications and endorsement 
letters no later than August 2, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Rabbe, 816-389-3837.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of June 4, 2018, in FR Doc. 2018-11891, on 
page 25655, correct the fourth paragraph in the third column as 
follows:
    This Notice is for individuals interested in serving as a 
stakeholder member on the Committee. Members and alternates must be 
able to demonstrate that they meet the definition of ``stakeholder'' 
found in the Charter of the MRRIC. Applications are currently being 
accepted for representation in the stakeholder interest categories 
listed below:
    a. Environmental/Conservation Org;
    b. Hydropower;
    c. Local Government;
    d. Major Tributaries;
    e. Navigation;
    f. Recreation;
    g. Thermal Power;
    h. Water Supply;
    i. Conservation Districts;
    j. Irrigation; and
    k. Fish & Wildlife.

    Dated: June 25, 2018.
Mark Harberg,
Program Manager for the Missouri River Recovery Program (MRRP).
[FR Doc. 2018-14189 Filed 6-29-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4565

_____________________________
A

ARON L EE D URNING , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jan Shackelford , Judge

. June 6, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , M AKAR , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Candice Kaye Brower, Regional Conflict Counsel, Gainesville, and Michael Jerome Titus
, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, f or Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Tabitha Rae Herrera
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
When a Public Health Emergency (PHE) is declared, 

Federal Supply Schedule contractors are available 

and ready to support. State, local, tribal and territorial 

governments can now benefit from the speed, savings, 

and ease of use of the Federal Supply Schedules when 

supporting declared Public Health Emergencies.

These new eligible ordering entities are now authorized to 

access all Federal Supply Schedules for the purchase of 

products and services when expending federal grants funds 

in response to Public Health Emergencies (PHEs) declared by 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 319 

of the Public Health Services Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 247d.

Federal Grantees Purchasing via Federal Supply Schedules in 

Response to Public Health Emergencies 

Access to the Federal Supply Schedules under this program 

is limited to state, local, tribal and territorial governments 

receiving grant funds in direct response to the PHE.

•	 Participation is voluntary for state, local, tribal and territorial 

governments, as well as Schedule contractors. 

•	 While GSA recommends that eligible purchasing officials 

follow the Schedule ordering procedures outlined in Federal 

Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 8.4, to ensure receiving the best 

value from Schedule contractors, use of these procedures are 

not mandated under this program. 

•	 When purchasing from Schedules, state, local, tribal and 

territorial governments should follow the ordering and 

competitive procedures that meet their own procurement 

regulations and any requirements stipulated in the grant 

funding. 

•	 Orders may be placed directly with participating Schedule 

contractors.

•	 The following language should be included on all task or delivery 

orders placed by state, local, tribal and territorial governments 

under this program:

This order is placed under Federal Supply Schedule 

number ________________ pursuant to GSA policy that 

authorizes state, local, territorial and tribal government 

entities, as authorized users for purchasing goods 

and services, when expending federal grant funds in 

response to Public Health Emergencies (PHEs) declared 

by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under 

section 319 of the Public Health Services Act, codified at 

42 U.S.C. § 247d.

For additional information on GSA Schedule ordering procedures, 

please visit www.gsa.gov/schedules-ordering.

Federal Grantee Access to Schedules in 

Response to Public Health Emergencies

For more information on all GSA State and Local Programs, 

visit: www.gsa.gov/stateandlocal

U.S. General Services Administration
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed financial statements included in the Company's Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such condensed financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          42,049
<SECURITIES>                                    33,687
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,508
<ALLOWANCES>                                       945
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,229
<PP&E>                                           7,953
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,211
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,265
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,010
<OTHER-SE>                                       (360)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    99,211
<SALES>                                         37,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,026
<CGS>                                            1,868
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,983
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  50
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,687
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,647
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,040
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34


</TABLE>
##### 



GOODRICH CORPORATION
Four Coliseum Centre
2730 West Tyvola Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217

May 14, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:
     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Goodrich Corporation (the Company) for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certifies, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                           
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
expressed in the Report.

| |  |                                                            
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Marshall O. Larsen                                     
| |  |                                                            
| |  | Name: Marshall O. Larsen                                   
| |  | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer               
| |  |                                                            
| |  | /s/ Ulrich Schmidt                                         
| |  |                                                            
| |  | Name: Ulrich Schmidt                                       
| |  | Title: Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Goodrich Corporation and will be retained by Goodrich Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 21.1 - SUBSIDIARIES



|                                               |  |  |  |                              
|---------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|DIRECT SUBSIDIARIES                            |  |  |  | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
|AuburnBank                                     |  |  |  | Alabama                      
|Auburn National Bancorporation Capital Trust I |  |  |  | Alabama                      
|                                               |  | 
|INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES                          |  |  |  |                              
|Banc of Auburn, Inc.                           |  |  |  | Alabama                      
|Auburn Mortgage Corporation                    |  |  |  | Alabama
# L_2005102EN.01S00301.xml

| 21.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

EEA Joint Committee Decision No 138/2004 was published in OJ L 342 of 18 November 2004, on page 30.

---
# C_2023252EN.01000401.xml

| 17.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/4

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof, Austria) — Staatlich genehmigte Gesellschaft der Autoren, Komponisten und Musikverleger Reg. Gen. mbH (AKM) v Canal+ Luxembourg Sàrl

(Case C-290/21, (1) AKM (Provision of satellite package in Austria))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual property - Copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission - Directive 93/83/EEC - Article 1(2) - Communication to the public by satellite - Concept - Satellite package provider - Broadcasting of programmes in another Member State - Place of the act of exploitation by which that provider participates in such communication)

(2023/C 252/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Staatlich genehmigte Gesellschaft der Autoren, Komponisten und Musikverleger Reg. Gen. mbH (AKM)

Defendant: Canal+ Luxembourg Sàrl

Interveners in support of the defendant: Tele 5 TM-TV GmbH, Österreichische Rundfunksender GmbH & Co. KG, Seven.One Entertainment Group GmbH, ProSiebenSat.1 PULS 4 GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(2)(b) of Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993 on the coordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission

must be interpreted as meaning that, where a satellite package provider is required to obtain, for the communication to the public by satellite in which it participates, the authorisation of the holders of the copyright and related rights concerned, that authorisation must be obtained, such as that granted to the broadcasting organisation concerned, only in the Member State in which the programme-carrying signals are introduced into the chain of communication leading to the satellite.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.

---
<PAGE>

                                                         Exhibit 23.1











Independent Auditors' Report


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Hello Direct, Inc.

Under date of January 22, 1999, we reported on the balance sheets of 
Hello Direct, Inc. as of December 31, 1998, and the related statements 
of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years 
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, as contained in the 
annual report on Form 10-K.  In connection with our audits of the 
aforementioned financial statements, we also audited the related 
financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index.  This 
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's 
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this 
financial statement schedule based on our audits.  In our opinion, such 
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic 
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material 
respects the information set forth therein.


                                                   /s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
January 22, 1999
EXHIBIT 32
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 Date:  July 25, 2008
    /s/Jeffrey S. GormanJeffrey S. GormanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) /s/Robert E. KirkendallRobert E. KirkendallSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)  23