alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05317**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  05317\05317_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 05317\05317_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05317\05317_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05317\05317_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05317\05317_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05317\05317_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05317\05317_PartF.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05317\05317_PartG.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05317\05317_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

05317\Certificate Statement Plant ID_05317.pdf Plant certification statement x 05317\Supporting Documentation\05317_Attachment 1_Part A_Sec. 5_A5-2.jpg Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05317\Supporting Documentation\05317_Attachment 1_Part F_Sec. 5_F5-6.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05317\Supporting Documentation\05317_Attachment 2_Part F_Sec. 5_F5-6.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05317\Supporting Documentation\Attachment 2_Part A_Sec. 5_A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05317\05317_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 05317\05317_Checklist_Template_091710_version12.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05317\05317_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 6 (Thursday, January 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1631-1632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00252]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

Sunshine Act Meeting

    The National Civilian Community Corps Advisory Board gives notice 
of the following meeting:

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, February 12, 2014, 1:30 p.m.-2:30 p.m. (ET).

PLACE: Conference Room 8312, 8th Floor, Corporation for National and 
Community Service Headquarters, 1201 New York Avenue NW., Washington, 
DC 20525.

CALL-IN INFORMATION: This meeting is available to the public through 
the following toll-free call-in number: 800-369-1759 conference call 
access code number 8093685. Kate Becker will be the lead on the call. 
Any interested member of the public may call this number and listen to 
the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls they 
initiate over wireless lines, and the Corporation will not refund any 
incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they initiate 
over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. Replays 
are generally available one hour after a call ends. The toll-free phone 
number for the

[[Page 1632]]

replay is 888-662-6649, replay passcode 2535. The end replay date: 
February 19, 2014, 2:29 p.m. (CT).

STATUS: Open.

Matters To Be Considered: 
I. Meeting Convenes
     Call to Order, Welcome, and Preview of Today's Meeting 
Agenda
     Introduction & Acknowledgements
II. Approval of Previous Meeting's Minutes
III. Director's Report
IV. Program Report
V. Budget and Operations Report
VI. Public Comment

ACCOMMODATIONS: Anyone who needs an interpreter or other accommodation 
should notify the Corporation's contact person by 5:00 p.m., Friday, 
February 7, 2014.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Erma Hodge, NCCC, Corporation for 
National and Community Service, 9th Floor, Room 9802B, 1201 New York 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone: 202-606-6696. Fax: 202-606-
3459. TTY: 800-833-3722. Email: ehodge@cns.gov.

    Dated: January 7, 2014.
Valerie E. Green,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-00252 Filed 1-7-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-P
```
Exhibit
10.17


 


EXTENSION
TO PROMISSORY NOTE


 


This
EXTENSION TO PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Amendment”) is made effective as of February 1, 2020, by Bed Therapies, Inc.,
a Texas corporation, as converted from Bed Therapies, LLC and merged into Omnia Wellness, Inc. (the “Company”), and
Barry Pressman, who is holder of the Company’s Promissory Note (the “Holder”).


 


RECITALS


 


The
Company and Holder entered into agreement on July 31, 2018 (the “Promissory Note”). Pursuant to the consent of the
Holder of the Note, the Note is hereby amended as follows:


 


AGREEMENT


 





1. PRINCIPAL. Section I of the Note is hereby amended and replacing “Maturity Date, January 31st, 2019” with Maturity Date, January 31st, 2021.







 


2.
INTEREST. Section 2 of the Note is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with: Interest on this Note shall commence
accruing on the Issuance Date and shall accrue daily at the Interest Rate of 14% per annum on the outstanding Principal amount
and should be paid monthly. The loan will be in effect for a minimum of twelve months, until the due date of January 31, 2021.
At the option of the Lender, the interest may be paid in the form of any equity or equity linked instrument being sold in an open
offering by the Company at the time the interest payment is due.


 





3. NO ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS. Except for the stated amendments in Section 1 and Section 2 of the Note dated August 1, 2018, all other terms and conditions of the Note remain in full force and effect.




  


4.
EXTENSION FEE. The Company agrees to issue Holder 20,000 common shares of Omnia Wellness, Inc., as consideration for this
Extension to Promissory Note and for the release of the personal guarantees ofJairial Bhuiyan and Nickolay Kukekov.


 


5.
NOTICE TO TRANSFEREES. This Amendment shall be binding on Holder of the Note. The terms of this Amendment shall be binding
upon and shall inure to the benefit of any successors or permitted assigns of the Company and the Holder. Any successor, permitted
assign or transferee of the Note after the date hereof shall be deemed to have acquired the Note as amended by this Amendment.


 


6.
CONSTRUCTION. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings set forth in the Note. The terms
of this Amendment amend and modify the Note as if fully set forth. If there is any conflict between the terms, conditions and
obligations of this Amendment and the Note, this Amendment’s terms, conditions and obligations shall control. Ail other
provisions of the Note not specifically modified by this Amendment are preserved.


 




    	 



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS HEREOF, this Amendment is made effective as of the date first set forth above.


 


	THE
    COMPANY:	 
	 	 	 
	OMNIA
    WELLNESS, Inc.,	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Steve R. Howe	 
	 	Steve
    R. Howe, Chairman	 
	 	 	 
	Accepted
    by:	 
	 	 
	/s/ Barry Pressman	 
	Holder,	 
	Barry Pressman
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 241 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 77

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 241

                          [Report No. 103-220]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 2010) to amend the National and Community Service Act of 
     1990 to establish a Corporation for National Service, enhance 
   opportunities for national service, and provide national service 
 educational awards to persons participating in such service, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 5, 1993

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                  House Calendar No. 77
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 241

                          [Report No. 103-220]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 2010) to amend the National and Community Service Act of 
     1990 to establish a Corporation for National Service, enhance 
   opportunities for national service, and provide national service 
 educational awards to persons participating in such service, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 5, 1993

  Mr. Beilenson, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 2010) to amend the National and Community Service Act of 
     1990 to establish a Corporation for National Service, enhance 
   opportunities for national service, and provide national service 
 educational awards to persons participating in such service, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2010) to amend the National and Community Service Act of 1990 to 
establish a Corporation for National Service, enhance opportunities for 
national service, and provide national service educational awards to 
persons participating in such service, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as 
read.
```
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31174]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14232]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1418 (Preliminary)]


Steel Propane Cylinders From Taiwan; Termination of Investigation

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 20, 2018, the Department of Commerce terminated its 
antidumping duty investigation of imports of steel propane cylinders 
from Taiwan, following petitioners' withdrawal of the petition and 
request that the investigation be terminated. Accordingly, the 
Commission is terminating its antidumping duty investigation concerning 
steel propane cylinders from Taiwan (Investigation No. 731-TA-1418 
(Preliminary)).

DATES: June 26, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lawrence Jones (202-205-3358), Office 
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street 
SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. 
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by 
accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public 
record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

    Authority: This investigation is being terminated under 
authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and pursuant to 
section 207.40(a) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (19 CFR 207.40(a)). This notice is published pursuant to 
section 201.10 of the Commission's rules (19 CFR 201.10).

    By order of the Commission.

    Dated: June 27, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-14232 Filed 7-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### HENRY *W.*STONE *vs.*WM. HEMPHILL JONES.

After judgment in attachment and auditors appointed, payment of the attaching creditor will not arrest the proceeding, which may go on even without substituting another plaintiif.

Domestic attachment issued to November term, 1843. Returned “attached goods as per inventory and appraisement, May 9, 1843, and afterwards, attached lands as per description.”

May 18th, 1844, on motion, judgment, and auditors appointed by the court.

After the appointment of auditors the judgment of the attaching creditor, Stone, was satisfied, and no further proceedings were taken under this attachment until- May term, 1845, when

*Patterson,*for Craige.

*Whitely,*for other creditors.

*Patterson,*for Craige, another creditor,

moved the court to substitute his client for the above plaintiff, in order that thp distribution might take place. He referred to. *Dig.*47, *sec.*4.

*Whitely,*for other creditors,

wished the proceedings to go on, but objected to the motion substituting any one of the creditors, as that would give such creditor a double share in the distribution, without any special diligence on his part.

*The Court*

said the proceedings under the attachment are not necessarily stopped by the payment of the claim of the attaching creditor, after judgment and auditors. appointed. The other creditors have an interest in the proceedings, as they may not issue any second writ of• attachment. A substitution is not necessary, as in the case of the death of the attaching creditor; the proceedings may still be conducted in his name; and the auditors have leave to report to the next term.

Order to auditors to proceed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 129 (Thursday, July 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14359]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-156, OMB Control No. 3235-0288]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

Extension:
    Form 20-F

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Form 20-F (17 CFR 249.220f) is used to register securities of 
foreign private issuers pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') (15 U.S.C. 78l) or as annual 
and transitional reports pursuant to Sections 13 and 15(d) of the 
Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) and 78o(d)). The information required in 
the Form 20-F is used by investors in making investment decisions with 
respect to the securities of such foreign private issuers. We estimate 
that Form 20-F takes approximately 2,649.52 hours per response and is 
filed by approximately 725 respondents. We estimate that 25% of the 
2,649.52 hours per response (662.3806 hours) is prepared by the issuer 
for a total reporting burden of 480,226 (662.3806 hours per response x 
725 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this 
information collection at the following website, www.reginfo.gov. 
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95c6fdf4f2e0f3e1f4cad4fdf8f0f1d5faf8f7bbf0fae5bbf2fae3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c5f646d6b796a786d534d646169684c63616e2269637c226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>; and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Candace 
Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ededccfd1c3efe7e2ece1f6cefdebeda0e9e1f8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ffafadbea0b29e96939d9087bf8c9a9cd1989089">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days 
of this notice.

    Dated: June 28, 2018.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14359 Filed 7-3-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2020271EN.01005302.xml

| 17.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/53

---

Action brought on 3 July 2020 — Bayerische Landesbank v SRB

(Case T-411/20)

(2020/C 271/67)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Bayerische Landesbank (Munich, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger and K. Helle, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 15 April 2020 on the calculation of contributions to the Single Resolution Fund collected in advance for 2020 (SRB/ES/2020/24), including its annexes, in so far as the contested decision, including Annex I and Annex II, concerns the applicant’s contribution; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 15 April 2020 on the calculation of contributions to the Single Resolution Fund collected in advance for 2020 (SRB/ES/2020/24), including its annexes, in so far as the contested decision, including Annex I and Annex II, concerns the applicant’s contribution;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The action is based on eleven pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those put forward in Case T-405/20, DZ Hyp v SRB.

---
Testimony EPA's Proposed Rule "Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Generating Units" Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602 Presented byTheodore Robinson Citizen Power July 31, 2014 Public Hearing

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Good afternoon and thank you for the opportunityto testifytoday. My name is Theodore Robinson and I am a staff attorneywith Citizen Power, a nonprofit public policy, research, education, and advocacy organization based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Since 1996, we have worked toward ensuringthat low-income consumers and environmental interests are represented in the operation ofthe electric generation industry. Citizen Powersupports both the purpose and the general methodologyofthe EPA's proposed rule. It is imperative that our nation effectively regulates greenhouse gases. The four building blocks approach underSection 111(d) is a reasonable and flexible step towards this goal. I would like to emphasize, however, that we viewthis proposed rule as only part ofthe solution. Additional legislation is necessary in orderto further reduce emissions. Although we generally supportthe proposed rule, our recommended changes to specific aspects ofthe rule will be addressed in ourwritten comments. I would like to highlightthree of these comments today. First, we believethat greater reductions than those proposed by the EPA are possible through the application ofthe "best system ofemission reduction." For example,the use ofatarget of8 to 10 percent heat rate improvements forthe existing fleet is supported by the existing literature and the low cost perton ofcarbon dioxide. In addition, we believe that the EIA data supports an energy efficiency "ramp-up" level of .3% instead ofthe proposed .2%. Second, the proposed inclusion of new and preserved nuclearcapacity as a substitute for carbon intensive generating capacity does not adequately reflect the future lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of nuclearfacilities. While wind generation has a consistently small greenhouse gas profile, the impact of nuclear facilities is dependent upon the uranium miningtechnologies used, the quality ofthe uranium ore, the enrichment method, and the carbon intensity ofthe electricity used for enrichment. The future qualityof uranium ore, in particular, may degrade as higher quality mines are depleted, resulting in greater processing and higher emissions in the future. Additionally, the cost ofdisposing of nuclear waste as well as the cost associated with the potential ofa nuclear accident needs to be taken into accountwhen estimatingthe cost of reducing carbon emissions through increasing nuclear capacity.

Third,the use of re-dispatchingto substitute combined cycle natural gas forfossil fuel-fired steam generation has impacts not addressed in the proposed rule. Specifically, the standard of performance musttake into account the environmental impacts of nonair quality health and environmental impacts. The impacts from fracking, which will be increased as a result of redispatching, such as impactstowater quality, should be addressed and quantified in the proposed rule. Thank you again forthe opportunity totestify.
#### Jeffrey Davis et al., Appellants, v William J. Magavern, II, et al., Respondents.

[654 NYS2d 517]

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Keystone Rubber Products Corporation (Keystone) was dissolved on December 31, 1989 after having sold its assets for $6.25 million. One of those assets was real property in the City of Buffalo, which defendants Magavern, Hodgson and Bergan purchased in February 1989 for $45,000. Magavern is a partner in the defendant law firm of Magavern & Magavern, which represented Keystone in its dissolution. Plaintiffs, former stockholders of Keystone, allege in their complaint that the real property was worth at least $350,000. The complaint alleges causes of action against Magavern and his firm for breach of fiduciary duty and failure to disclose a conflict of interest, and a cause of action against Magavern, Hodgson and Bergan for unjust enrichment.

Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. "It is axiomatic that a shareholder has no individual cause of action to recover damages for a wrong against a corporation, even if thát shareholder loses the value of his investment or incurs personal liability in an effort to maintain the solvency of the corporation” *(Elenson v Wax,*215 AD2d 429). To recover for wrongs committed against a corporation, a shareholder must commence a shareholder’s derivative action *(see, Abrams v Donati,*66 NY2d 951, 953, *rearg denied*67 NY2d 758). Here, the complaint alleges wrongs committed against the corporation, for which plaintiffs may sue only derivatively. Plaintiffs lack legal capacity to sue individually for the causes of action they assert *(see,*CPLR 3211 [a] [3]). Their request, made for the first time on appeal, for leave to serve amended pleadings is untimely. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Balio, JJ.