Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2019
                              Vincent Koh, M.D., DAB CR5262 (2019)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Vincent Koh, M.D., DAB CR5262 (2019)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Vincent Koh, M.D.,
	(OI File No. 2-13-40348-9),
	Petitioner,
v.
The Inspector General
Docket No. C-19-78Decision No. CR5262March 5, 2019

        
              
    

      DECISION
Petitioner, Vincent Koh, M.D., is a physician, licensed to practice in the State of New York.  He owned a medical practice that specialized in the care and treatment of cancer patients.  He pled guilty to one count of receiving in interstate commerce and delivering a misbranded drug.  Based on his guilty plea, the Inspector General (IG) has excluded him for five years from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs, as authorized by section 1128(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (Act).  Petitioner appeals the exclusion.  For the reasons discussed below, I find that the IG properly excluded Petitioner Koh and that the statute mandates a minimum five-year exclusion.
Background
In a letter dated September 28, 2018, the IG notified Petitioner that he was excluded from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs for a period of five years because he had been convicted of a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or a state health care program.  The letter explained that section 1128(a)(1) of the Act authorizes the exclusion.  IG Ex. 1.
Page 2
Petitioner timely requested review.
The IG submitted a written argument (IG Br.) and six exhibits (IG Exs. 1-6).  Petitioner responded to the IG’s brief (P. Br.) and submitted 12 exhibits (P. Exs. 1-12).  The IG filed a reply.
In the absence of any objections, I admit into evidence IG Exs. 1-6 and P. Exs. 1-12.
The parties agree that an in-person hearing is not necessary.  IG Br. at 8; P. Br. at 19.
Discussion
***Petitioner must be excluded from program participation for a minimum of five years because he was convicted of a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare.  Act § 1128(a)(1).***1
Under section 1128(a)(1) of the Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services must exclude an individual who has been convicted under federal or state law of a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or a state health care program.  42 C.F.R. § 1001.101(a).
Petitioner Koh was a physician who maintained a private medical practice, specializing in the care and treatment of cancer patients.  IG Ex. 3 at 4.  His practice purchased oncology drugs from a Canadian company that sold drugs obtained from foreign sources.  The drugs were less expensive than those sold in the United States, but they were not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), did not include the same ingredients as the approved drugs, did not include directions for use, and did not meet FDA labeling requirements.  IG Ex. 3 at 3-5.  Petitioner Koh prescribed these drugs to his New York patients and, in some instances, billed the Medicare program for the drugs and for administering them.  IG Ex. 3 at 4; IG Ex. 5 at 4.
Petitioner was charged with one count of receiving in interstate commerce and delivering a misbranded drug.  IG Ex. 2.  He pled guilty, admitting that he received and distributed drugs that the Food and Drug Administration had not approved for distribution or use in the United States.  IG Ex. 3 at 3.  On May 21, 2018, the federal district court for the Northern District of New York accepted Petitioner’s plea and entered judgment against him.  IG Ex. 4.
Page 3
While the criminal action was pending, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York brought a parallel civil action, alleging violations of the federal False Claims Act.  Petitioner Koh also settled that action.  Among other admissions, he agreed that:
his patients included individuals covered by the Medicare program;
	he prescribed non-approved drugs to his patients;
	Medicare generally pays for FDA-approved drugs only;
	a physician who submits a claim for a covered drug represents that the drug administered is an FDA-approved drug; and
	he “submitted or caused to be submitted knowingly false claims for payment to Medicare Part B for payment of non-FDA-approved drugs and for the administration of such drugs.”IG Ex. 5 at 1, 4.  Petitioner agreed to pay the United States $500,000 in settlement, “of which $250,000 constitutes restitution.”  IG Ex. 5 at 4.
There is no doubt that the Petitioner’s False Claims Act settlement is tied directly to his criminal conviction.  In the sentencing memorandum he submitted to the criminal court, he pointed out that, as part of the civil action, he paid the government $500,000, so any additional fine would be “redundant and thoroughly unnecessary.”  IG Ex. 6 at 4.
Petitioner, nevertheless, maintains that his crime was not “related to” the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or a state healthcare program.  He argues that I may not consider the evidence adduced during the civil proceedings because civil proceedings require a lesser burden of proof than criminal proceedings.  Petitioner cites no direct support for this *non sequitur* of an argument, but lists cases in which the program connection was established by the criminal record.  Obviously, where the record of a conviction establishes the connection, the relatedness standard is met; but it does not follow that the connection can be established through the record of the conviction alone.  In fact, it is well-settled that, in determining whether a conviction is program-related, I may look beyond the four corners of the criminal court record, and consider extrinsic evidence to determine the facts and circumstances underlying a conviction.  42 C.F.R. § 1005.17(g) (evidence of “crimes, wrongs, or acts other than those at issue in the instant case is admissible in order to show motive, opportunity, intent, knowledge, preparation, identity, lack of mistake, or existence of a scheme”); *Janet R. Constantino*, DAB No. 2666 at 7-8 (2015) (holding that the basis for the underlying conviction may be established by judicial records *or other probative evidence*); *Narendra M. Patel*, *M.D.*, DAB No. 1736 (2000) (stating that the Departmental Appeals Board has “repeatedly”
Page 4
held that the basis for an exclusion need not appear in the court records, but may be demonstrated “by extrinsic evidence of the underlying facts and circumstances . . . .”, *aff’d*,*Patel v. Thompson*, 319 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2003).
Pointing to the “strict liability” nature of his misdemeanor conviction, Petitioner suggests that it shows that he did not intend to violate the law and therefore poses no risk to program integrity.  I find two problems with this position:  1) as a factual matter, he admitted in the False Claims Act settlement that he “knowingly” submitted the false claims to the Medicare program; and 2) the exclusion statute “does not require any knowledge on the part of a petitioner of the relationship between the offense and the program but only that the factual relationship between the offense and the program exist . . . .”  *Lyle Kai, R. Ph*., DAB No 1979 at 5 (2005), *aff’d*,*Kai v. Leavitt*, No. 05‐00514 BMK (D. Haw. July 17, 2006).
Finally, Petitioner submits evidence (letters from colleagues and patients) attesting to his good character and skills as a physician and discussing the impact his exclusion will have on his patients.  P. Exs. 11, 12.  Such arguments are not relevant.  My authority is constrained by the regulations, and I may not review the IG’s determination to impose a mandatory exclusion “on the ground that the excluded person is a good person or well-thought of in the profession or suffering from the loss of his/her vocation.”  *Donna Rogers*, DAB No. 2381 at 6 (2011).
Because his criminal conviction was directly related to the delivery of services under the Medicare program, Petitioner is subject to exclusion.  An exclusion brought under section 1128(a)(1) must be for a minimum period of five years.  Act § 1128(c)(3)(B); 42 C.F.R. § 1001.2007(a)(2).
Conclusion
The IG properly excluded Petitioner from participating in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal health care programs, and I sustain the five-year exclusion.


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law. back to note 1 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back