Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2020
                              Robert Fleming, Jr. PT, DAB CR5611 (2020)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Robert Fleming, Jr. PT, DAB CR5611 (2020)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Robert Fleming, Jr. PT,
	(PTAN: 1026513486)
	(NPI: 1447298708)
	Petitioner,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-18-204Decision No. CR5611May 13, 2020

        
              
    

      DECISION
Petitioner, Robert Fleming, Jr., is a physical therapist, licensed in Alabama, who participates in the Medicare program as a supplier of services.  After his Medicare billing privileges were deactivated, he applied to reenroll in the program.  The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) granted the application, effective February 16, 2017, resulting in a lengthy coverage lapse.  Petitioner now asks for an earlier effective date.  *See* P. Ex. 9 (asking that his effective date “be pushed back to a date that would make it possible to bill for any services provided by Mr. Fleming that would fall in to the timely filing range as of the date of this [request for reconsideration].”).
Because Petitioner filed his subsequently-approved enrollment application on February 16, 2017, I find that February 16 is the correct effective date for his enrollment.  *Howard M. Sokoloff, DPM, MS, Inc.*, DAB No. 2972 at 6-7 (2019); *Urology Grp. of NJ, LLC*, DAB No. 2860 at 7 (2018); *Willie Goffney, Jr., M.D.*, DAB No. 2763 at 7 (2017), *aff’d sub nom.* *Goffney v. Azar*, No. CV 17-8032 MRW (C.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 2019).
Page 2
Background
In a notice letter dated May 15, 2017, the Medicare contractor, Cahaba, advised Petitioner that it approved his Medicare enrollment effective February 9, 2017.  CMS Ex. 2 at 1; P. Ex. 7.  The effective date was incorrect, and, in a letter dated October 3, 2017, the contractor amended the effective date to February 16, 2017.  CMS Ex. 2 at 4.  Petitioner requested reconsideration.  CMS Ex. 3; P. Ex. 9.
In a reconsidered determination, dated September 25, 2017, the contractor affirmed the February 16 effective date.  CMS Ex. 1; P. Ex. 8.  Petitioner appealed.
**Summary judgment**.  Petitioner moves for summary judgment, which CMS opposes.  I find that this matter may be decided on the written record, without considering whether the standards for summary judgment are satisfied.  The initial order in this case instructed the parties to list any proposed witnesses and to submit their written direct testimony.  Acknowledgment and Pre-hearing Order at 3, 5 (¶¶ 4(c)(iv), 8) (November 20, 2017).  The order also directed the parties to indicate which, if any, of the opposing side’s witnesses the party wished to cross-examine and explained that an in-person hearing would be needed only if a party wishes to cross-examine the opposing side’s witness.  *Id*. at 5 (¶¶ 9, 10).  Petitioner lists no witnesses.  Although CMS lists one witness and provides her written declaration (CMS Ex. 7), Petitioner has not asked to cross-examine her.  An in-person hearing would therefore serve no purpose, and I may decide this case based on the written record without considering whether the standards for summary judgment are met.
Petitioner submits his motion and brief (P. Br.) with 11 exhibits (P. Exs. 1-11).  CMS submits its pre-hearing brief and response to Petitioner’s motion (CMS Br.) with seven exhibits (CMS. Exs. 1-7).  In the absence of any objections, I admit into evidence P. Exs. 1-11 and CMS Exs. 1-7.  *See* Acknowledgment and Pre-hearing Order at 5 (¶ 7).
Discussion
***Petitioner filed his subsequently-approved enrollment application on February 16, 2017, and his Medicare reactivation enrollment can be no earlier than that date.  42 C.F.R. § 424.520(d).***1
**Enrollment**.  Petitioner participates in the Medicare program as a “supplier” of services.  Social Security Act § 1861(d); 42 C.F.R. § 498.2.  To receive Medicare payments for the services furnished to program beneficiaries, a prospective supplier must enroll in the
Page 3
program.  42 C.F.R. § 424.505.  “Enrollment” is the process by which CMS and its contractors:  1) identify the prospective supplier; 2) validate the supplier’s eligibility to provide items or services to Medicare beneficiaries; 3) identify and confirm a supplier’s owners and practice location; and 4) grant the supplier Medicare billing privileges.  42 C.F.R. § 424.502.
To enroll, a prospective supplier must complete and submit an enrollment application.  42 C.F.R. §§ 424.510(d)(1), 424.515(a).  An enrollment application is either a CMS‐approved paper application or an electronic process approved by the Office of Management and Budget.  42 C.F.R. § 424.502.2
   When CMS determines that a prospective supplier meets the applicable enrollment requirements, it grants Medicare billing privileges, which means that the supplier can submit claims and receive payments from Medicare for covered services provided to program beneficiaries.  For a non‐physician practitioner, the effective date for billing privileges “is the *later*of the date of filing” a subsequently-approved enrollment application or “the date that the supplier first began furnishing services at a new practice location.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.520(d) (emphasis added).
**Revalidation and Deactivation**.  To maintain his billing privileges, a supplier must, at least every five years, resubmit and recertify the accuracy of his enrollment information, a process referred to as “revalidation.”  42 C.F.R. § 424.515.  In addition to periodic revalidations, CMS may, at other times and for its own reasons, ask a supplier to recertify the accuracy of his enrollment information.  42 C.F.R. § 424.515(d) and (e).  Within 60 days of receiving CMS’s notice to recertify, the supplier must submit an appropriate enrollment application with complete and accurate information and supporting documentation.  42 C.F.R. § 424.515(a)(2).
If, within 90 days from receipt of CMS’s notice, the supplier does not furnish complete and accurate information and all supporting documentation or does not resubmit and certify the accuracy of his enrollment information, CMS may deactivate his billing privileges, and no Medicare payments will be made.  42 C.F.R. §§ 424.540(a)(3), 424.555(b).  To reactivate his billing privileges, the supplier must complete and submit a new enrollment application.  42 C.F.R. § 424.540(b)(1).  It is settled that, following deactivation, section 424.520(d) governs the effective date of reenrollment.  *Sokoloff*, DAB No. 2972 at 6-7; *Urology Grp.*, DAB No. 2860 at 7; *Goffney*, DAB No. 2763 at 7.
I have no authority to review a deactivation.  *Sokoloff*, DAB No. 2972 at 6; *Ark. Health Grp*., DAB No. 2929 at 7-9 (2019).
Page 4
**Petitioner’s deactivation and reenrollment**.  In a notice letter, dated *February 26, 2013*, the contractor directed Petitioner to revalidate his Medicare enrollment by updating or confirming the information in his record.  The letter directed Petitioner to submit **IMMEDIATELY** an updated paper CMS-855 Medicare enrollment application or to review, update, and certify his information through the PECOS system.  The letter warned that Petitioner had to revalidate within 60 calendar days of the letter’s postmark date, or risk deactivation of his Medicare billing privileges.  CMS Ex. 4.
Petitioner maintains that he submitted his reactivation packet on July 30, 2015.  P. Ex. 1.  However, the contractor denies receiving any response to its revalidation request.  CMS Ex. 5 at 1; CMS Ex. 7 (Bell Decl. ¶¶ 6, 8).  In any event, no matter how compelling the circumstances, I have no authority to review a deactivation.  *Ark. Health Grp*., DAB No. 2929 at 7-9, and cases cited therein.
By letter dated *May 16, 2015*, the contractor advised Petitioner that his billing privileges were stopped, effective May 15, 2015, because he had not responded to the February 26, 2013 revalidation request.  The letter advised Petitioner that, in order to resume billing, he should **IMMEDIATELY** submit an updated paper enrollment application, or he should review, update, and certify his information via PECOS.  CMS Ex. 5.
Petitioner denies receiving this letter.  He claims that his billing agent made multiple calls to the contractor, but heard only an automated message advising that the contractor was “making every effort” to process a “higher than normal” number of applications.  The message asked that the caller not resubmit an application because that could delay processing.  P. Br. at 2; *see* P. Exs. 2, 3.  On February 9, 2017, the billing agent finally spoke to a contractor representative and learned that the 2015 application “had been lost.”  P. Br. at 2; *see* P. Ex. 3.
On *February 16, 2017*, Petitioner filed a Medicare enrollment application that the contractor approved.  CMS Ex. 6; CMS Ex. 7 (Bell Decl. ¶ 7); *see* P. Ex. 5.  Thus, pursuant to section 424.520(d), the date Petitioner filed his subsequently-approved enrollment application – February 16, 2017 – is the correct effective date of enrollment.  *Sokoloff*, DAB No. 2972 at 6-7; *Urology Grp.*, DAB No. 2860 at 7-9; *Goffney*, DAB 2763 at 7.
I have no authority to grant Petitioner an earlier effective date based on equitable and policy arguments.  *Sokoloff*, DAB No. 2972 at 9.
Page 5
Conclusion
Because Petitioner filed his subsequently-approved reenrollment application on February 16, 2017, CMS properly granted his Medicare reenrollment effective that date.


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law. back to note 1
                      2. CMS’s electronic process is referred to as PECOS (Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System). back to note 2 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back