alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 457

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

June 21, 1994.

Whereas on June 21, 1964, James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner gave their lives at a young

age in an effort to guarantee the rights that are the

birthright of every citizen of the United States, particularly the right to vote;

Whereas James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael

Schwerner were part of a movement that helped to

achieve the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the

Voting Rights Act of 1965 and other milestones in the

progress of this Nation toward achieving the goal of ensuring equal rights, equal opportunities and equal justice

for all;

Whereas during the 30 years after the deaths of James

Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner, this

Nation has benefitted tremendously from the removal of

many barriers to full participation by every citizen of this

Nation in political, educational and economic life;

Whereas the lives and resultant deaths of James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner have come to

symbolize the dream of brotherhood and sisterhood

among citizens of this Nation from all races, religions

and ethnic backgrounds and serve to inspire all citizens—
2

HRES 457 EH

in particular young citizens—to be dedicated to the ideals

of justice, equality, citizenship and community;

Whereas the lifework of these men and thousands of other

young students who traveled to Mississippi remains unfinished until all barriers are removed that bar the full

participation of every citizen of this Nation in the democratic process of this Nation, especially the electoral process; and

Whereas the Nation continues to need the leadership and involvement of all its citizens, in particular the young, in

solving problems in their communities and improving the

lives of those in need: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that—

(1) June 21, 1994, is designated as Freedom Summer Remembrance Day;

(2) the House of Representatives expresses the importance of citizens—regardless of party, ideology, age,

race, creed, and socio-economic status—working to improve this Nation and address issues most critical to

their communities;

(3) the Voting Rights Act of 1965 has helped to

fulfill the promise of democracy in this Nation; and
3

HRES 457 EH

(4) the House of Representatives reaffirms the goal

of removing remaining barriers to full voter participation

in this Nation.

Attest:

Clerk.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yf i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f

orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). D A T / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. L OR E AN O G OME Z - VI L L A, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 09- 10163 D. C . No . 2 : 0 3 - C R - 0 0 7 5 1 - J AT ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona J a m e s A . T e i l bor g, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r17, 2009 ** B e f o r e : A L A R C Ó N , T R O T T , a n dT A S H I M A , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . L oreano G om ez -V i l l a app ea l s f rom the 18 -m on th sent ence i m po se d f ol l ow i ng the r e voc a t i on of s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED DE C 16 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSD AT / Res ea r ch 09- 10163 2 G om e z - V i l l ac ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtpr oc e dur a l l ye rr e d by , a m ong o th e rth in g s , im p o s in g a n ab o v e - G u id e lin e s v a r ia n c e w ith o u t a d e q u a te ly c ons i de r i ng hi s m i t i ga t i on a r gum e nt s tha the ha d r e turne d t o the U ni t e d S t a t e s t o be w ith h is c h ild r e n . H is c o n te n tio n s a r e b e lie db yth e r e c o r d . See U ni ted States v. Ca r ty , 5 2 0 F .3 d9 8 4 , 9 9 2 - 9 3 , 9 9 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( e n b a n c ) ; see a l so U ni ted States v. L eo n a rd , 48 3 F . 3d 63 5, 63 7 (9th C i r. 20 07 ). In addi t i on , the re cord ref l ec t s that h is s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le , u n d e rth e to ta lityo f th e c ir c u m s ta n c e s . See G al l v. U ni ted States , 55 2 U . S . 38 , 51 -52 (20 07 ). AF F I RME D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          23,796
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  332,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,681
<INVENTORY>                                     47,519
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               418,543
<PP&E>                                       5,523,114
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,395,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,723,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          490,739
<BONDS>                                        942,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,600
<COMMON>                                       650,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     215,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,723,693
<SALES>                                        423,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               423,998
<CGS>                                          161,667
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  321,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,555
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 85,697
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,658
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             56,039
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    462
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,577
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### CREDITHRIFT OF AMERICA NO. 3, INC. v. Anna O. MARGIOTTA et al.

No. 62022.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 5, 1978.

In re: Credithrift of America No. 3, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.
# C_2022095EN.01000402.xml

| 28.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/4

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — VX v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-224/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Direct taxation - Taxation of capital gains on immovable property - Articles 63 and 65 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Discrimination - Higher tax liability on capital gains on immovable property made by non-residents - Election for taxation under the same procedures as residents)

(2022/C 95/06)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VX

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Operative part of the order

Articles 63 and 65(1) TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State relating to personal income tax which, as regards capital gains arising from the sale of immovable property situated in that Member State, systematically makes non-residents subject to a higher tax liability than that which would be applied, for the same type of transaction, to capital gains made by residents, notwithstanding the option available to non-residents to opt for the regime applicable to residents.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 28.6.2021

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                 DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                           105,913
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 205,913
<PP&E>                                                            19,837
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    51,595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   225,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          2,646,620
<BONDS>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                          17,435
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (2,438,305)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     225,750
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       0
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               7,342,622
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             4,356,091
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (11,698,713)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (11,698,713)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (11,698,713)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (.07)



</TABLE>
#### James W. GORMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-959.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 14, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Alfred WITTCOP, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Respondent.

No. 70-937.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 18, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### Charles SIMON, Appellant, v. Sally SIMON, Appellee.

No. 73-353.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 13, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; George W. Tedder, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# C_2021019EN.01006901.xml

| 18.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/69

---

Action brought on 16 November 2020 — Freshly Cosmetics v EUIPO — Misiego Blázquez (IDENTY BEAUTY)

(Case T-688/20)

(2021/C 19/75)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Freshly Cosmetics, SL (Reus, Spain) (represented by: P. Roiger Bellostes, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Francisco Misiego Blázquez (Madrid, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark IDENTY BEAUTY — Application for registration No 17 913 910

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 September 2020 in Case R 205/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and grant the registration of European Union trade mark No 17 913 910 IDENTY BEAUTY in respect of all the goods and services in Class 3; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and grant the registration of European Union trade mark No 17 913 910 IDENTY BEAUTY in respect of all the goods and services in Class 3;

| — | order the proprietor of the earlier mark to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the proprietor of the earlier mark to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
No. 10663.

#### Sands, an Infant, by etc., *v.*The Betts Street Furniture Co.

Decided January 26, 1909.

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Messrs. Cogan & Williams,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Robertson & Buchwalt'r,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Summers, Spear, Davis, Sitauck and Price,, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Louis Lee LOAFT, Relator, v. COURT OF RECORD OF BROWARD COUNTY, Nels R. Pearson, Judge, Respondent.

No. 71-1063.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 12, 1972.

Prohibition denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,580
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  186,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,361)
<INVENTORY>                                    164,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               388,348
<PP&E>                                         210,111
<DEPRECIATION>                                (86,442)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 865,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          167,837
<BONDS>                                        470,566
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,262
<OTHER-SE>                                     191,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   865,691
<SALES>                                        448,114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               448,114
<CGS>                                          257,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  257,609
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               174,819
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,784
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,098)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,064)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,034)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,034)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 554 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 230
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 554

                          [Report No. 103-759]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4650) making appropriations for the Department of Defense 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1994

    Mr. Frost, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4650) making appropriations for the Department of Defense 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That all points of order against the conference report to 
accompany the bill (H.R. 4650) making appropriations for the Department 
of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other 
purposes, and against its consideration are waived.

                                                 House Calendar No. 230

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 554

                          [Report No. 103-759]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4650) making appropriations for the Department of Defense 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 28, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### AERODEX, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. Willie BUCKNER et al., Respondents.

No. 36705.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 14, 1968.

Summers Warden, Miami, for petitioners.

George F. Taylor, Jr., of Spencer & Taylor, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date July 21, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
No. 10701.

#### Walch et al. *v.*Eagan et al.

Decided February 2, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas .county.

*Mr. Ralph Emery,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Gilbert Harmon,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                      $2,791,453
<SECURITIES>                                  $240,033
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $4,007,029
<PP&E>                                        $192,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $4,442,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         $103,432
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       $18,698
<OTHER-SE>                                  $4,424,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                $4,442,801
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               $49,799
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $391,368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              $439,555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             $(439,555)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         $(439,555)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                $(439,555)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.20






 Apria, Inc. has requested confidential treatment of this registration statement and
associated correspondence 
 pursuant to Rule 83 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

 Exhibit 10.20 

December 1, 2020 
 Mark E. Litkovitz 

[redacted] 
  

	Re:	 Amendment of Executive Vice President Agreement 



Dear Mark E. Litkovitz: 
 This letter confirms the amendment, as
set forth below, of your Executive Vice President Severance Agreement, dated April 30, 2014, with Apria Healthcare Group Inc. (the “Agreement”). 

In the event that you become entitled to severance pay pursuant to Section 4 of the Agreement, each payment in a series of payments under the Severance
Agreement shall be deemed to be a separate payment for purposes of Section 409A of the Code of 1986, as amended. 
 Except as expressly provided in the
preceding paragraph, your Agreement continues in effect in accordance with its terms. This letter agreement shall be construed and interpreted consistent with Section 11(a) of the Severance Agreement. 

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Celina Scally at [redacted]. 

 

			
	APRIA HEALTHCARE GROUP INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Celina M. Scally

	Name:	 	Celina M. Scally
	Title:	 	Chief Human Resources Officer


  

	
	Acknowledged and agreed:
	
	 /s/ Mark E. Litkovitz

	Mark E. Litkovitz
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: Bill Neuffer/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Mariana 

Cubeddu/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 09/28/2011 03:40 PM 

Subject: RIN 2060-AQ10 

Hi Bill,

We have concluded review of RIN 2060-AQ10, Review of New Source Performance Standards for Nitric 

Acid Plants--Subpart G. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,

Cortney

________________________________________________

Cortney Higgins

Policy Analyst

OMB/OIRA/NRE

202.395.7856

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
No. 11325.

#### Ryan *v.*The State of Ohio.

Decided December 15, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Athens county.

*Mr. W. O. Henderson*and *Messrs. Grosvenor, Jones & Worstell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. S. V.*McMahon, prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. W. A. Carey,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.