alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 382 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 382

 Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 65) to amend title 
 10, United States Code, to permit retired members of the Armed Forces 
who have a service-connected disability to receive military retired pay 
          concurrently with veterans' disability compensation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 1994

Mr. Bilirakis submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 65) to amend title 
 10, United States Code, to permit retired members of the Armed Forces 
who have a service-connected disability to receive military retired pay 
          concurrently with veterans' disability compensation.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
House shall resolve itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the 
state of the Union for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 65) to amend 
title 10, United States Code, to permit retired members of the Armed 
Forces who have a service-connected disability to receive retired pay 
concurrently with veterans' disability compensation, and the first 
reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order 
against the bill and against its consideration are waived. After 
general debate which shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by Representative Bilirakis of Florida and the chairman of 
the Committee on Armed Services, or their designees, the bill shall be 
considered as having been read for amendment under the five-minute 
rule. No amendment to the bill shall be in order except one amendment 
by, and if ordered by, Representative Bilirakis, or a designee, said 
amendment shall be considered as read, shall not be subject to further 
amendment but shall be debatable for not a exceed one-hour to be 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, and 
all points of order against the amendment are waived.
    If on any day the Committee of the Whole rises and reports that it 
has come to no resolution on the bill, then on the next legislative day 
the House shall, immediately after the approval of the Journal, resolve 
into the Committee of the Whole for further consideration of the bill.
    At the conclusion of the consideration of the bill for amendment 
the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such 
amendment as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and any amendment thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit, with 
or without instructions.

                                 <all>
```
#### Winston L. GARESCHE and Elizabeth Garesche, his wife, Appellants, v. TEXTURED COATINGS OF AMERICA, INC., etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 76-1952.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 22, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1978.

*1208F. Hartselle Baker, Orlando, for appellants.

Ronald A. Cyril, of Nelson, Hesse, Cyril & Weber, Sarasota, for appellee Textured Coatings of America, Inc.

Pierre Lee Steward, Orlando, for appellee Blackton, Inc.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellant sued the manufacturer, distributor and applicator of Tex-Cote, a fiberglass and asbestos material advertised to be an end to painting problems on house exteriors. The complaint alleges breach of warranty, fraud and negligence on the part of the various Defendants in the advertising, manufacturing and applying of the product. Upon a review of the evidence presented we find the court erred in directing a verdict for the Defendants.

For example, Appellants proved they relied upon allegedly untrue statements in a Textured Coatings of America, Inc. brochure which was distributed by or through the other Appellees. Appellants established their reliance thereon was to their detriment and otherwise established a prima fa-cie case against the Appellees. In addition, the uncontroverted proof was that the Tex-Cote, which had deteriorated to an unsightly peeling, could not be removed and it would take $1,650.00 to cover the unappealing areas with aluminum siding. Of course, maybe the Appellees at trial can prove otherwise but the matter should be tried. We remand this matter for trial on all issues.

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

CROSS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Figure 91. Natural gas production by source, 1990-2040 (trillion cubic feet)

Source: http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/MT_naturalgas.cfm Accessed: 1/10/14

Alaska

Coalbed 

Methane

Lower 48 

Offshore

Lower 48 

Onshore 

Conventio

nal Tight gas Shale Gas

1990 0.38 0.27 5.33 9.50 2.13 0.20

1991 0.41 0.35 5.08 9.32 2.38 0.15

1992 0.41 0.56 4.95 9.60 2.15 0.17

1993 0.40 0.75 5.09 9.22 2.42 0.22

1994 0.52 0.86 5.39 9.50 2.32 0.23

1995 0.43 0.96 5.33 9.02 2.58 0.28

1996 0.44 1.11 5.53 8.06 3.55 0.16

1997 0.43 1.18 5.51 7.89 3.66 0.24

1998 0.43 1.31 5.45 7.73 3.85 0.26

1999 0.42 1.39 5.37 7.60 3.78 0.27

2000 0.42 1.51 5.17 7.73 4.03 0.32

2001 0.44 1.60 5.33 7.63 4.25 0.36

2002 0.43 1.65 4.75 7.21 4.44 0.45

2003 0.46 1.70 4.76 6.97 4.68 0.52

2004 0.44 1.72 4.22 6.52 5.09 0.60

2005 0.46 1.73 3.37 6.32 5.43 0.75

2006 0.42 1.76 3.10 6.40 5.82 1.00

2007 0.41 1.78 2.98 6.34 6.26 1.50

2008 0.37 1.99 2.68 6.44 6.43 2.25

2009 0.37 1.72 2.70 5.55 6.80 3.47

2010 0.35 1.69 2.44 5.65 6.34 4.86

2011 0.35 1.71 2.11 5.12 5.86 7.85

2012 0.32 1.67 2.19 5.83 5.76 8.13

2013 0.31 1.69 1.92 5.59 5.89 8.60

2014 0.30 1.67 1.83 5.54 5.85 8.66

2015 0.30 1.64 1.89 5.50 5.85 8.85

2016 0.29 1.70 2.09 5.60 6.08 9.37

2017 0.29 1.71 2.03 5.38 6.21 9.79

2018 0.29 1.73 2.03 5.29 6.31 10.28

2019 0.28 1.73 2.05 5.17 6.37 10.70

2020 0.28 1.71 2.07 5.11 6.40 11.05

2021 0.27 1.70 2.12 5.04 6.44 11.38

2022 0.27 1.70 2.20 4.97 6.49 11.77

2023 0.27 1.69 2.22 4.86 6.54 12.18

2024 0.50 1.67 2.18 4.73 6.56 12.52

2025 0.73 1.66 2.19 4.60 6.56 12.84

2026 0.97 1.67 2.19 4.43 6.59 13.10

2027 1.20 1.67 2.25 4.23 6.61 13.39

2028 1.20 1.68 2.26 4.06 6.61 13.66

2029 1.19 1.69 2.29 3.86 6.65 13.92

2030 1.19 1.69 2.34 3.74 6.67 14.17
2031 1.19 1.69 2.42 3.65 6.71 14.41

2032 1.19 1.70 2.57 3.57 6.75 14.62

2033 1.19 1.70 2.72 3.50 6.79 14.81

2034 1.18 1.71 2.76 3.42 6.87 15.05

2035 1.18 1.73 2.81 3.33 6.96 15.33

2036 1.18 1.78 2.71 3.25 7.07 15.68

2037 1.18 1.87 2.60 3.17 7.16 16.02

2038 1.18 1.96 2.59 3.09 7.23 16.33

2039 1.18 2.04 2.78 3.01 7.28 16.52

2040 1.18 2.11 2.85 2.96 7.34 16.70
#### WINN DIXIE STORES, INC., a corporation, Appellant, v. Jessamine A. BENTON, Appellee.

No. 69-413.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 1, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 732

To provide for fair and nonpartisan administration of Federal elections.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1993

Mr. OWENS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on House Administration

A BILL

To provide for fair and nonpartisan administration of

Federal elections.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That this Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Elections Act

4 of 1993’’.

5 SEC. 2. Each registrar, voting judge, member of a

6 board of elections, or other person (other than an elected

7 official) who, under any provision of State law, has direct

8 responsibility for administration of a Federal election or

9 registration for such election—

10 (1) shall be selected solely on the basis of merit

11 and without regard to political affiliation; and
2

HR 732 IH

1 (2) having been so selected, shall not be dis2 qualified from continuing to carry out that respon3 sibility for any reason other than unfitness or inabil4 ity to perform the functions involved.

5 SEC. 3. As used in this Act, the term—

6 (1) ‘‘Federal election’’ means a general, special,

7 or primary election held solely or in part with re8 spect to the office of President or Vice President, or

9 Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resi10 dent Commissioner to, the Congress; and

11 (2) ‘‘State’’ means a State of the United

12 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth

13 of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the

14 United States.

15 SEC. 4. This Act shall apply to elections held more

16 than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Rhonda Marie WILSON et al. v. N. W. MAGEE et al.

No. 62633.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 15, 1978.

In re: Rhonda Marie Wilson applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of St. Charles.

Granted. It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Multifamily Prepayment File Layout

This report provides one month of Multifamily Prepayment Information.

Report Data Item

Issuer Number

Pool Number

Pool Type

Period Month

Period Year

Penalty Amount

Remaining Principal Balance Amount

For each Issuer Number, the report totals values from the Penalty Amount Data Item.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JOHNSTON
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JULY 4, 1998 AND
FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                         284,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               35,007,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,929,000
<INVENTORY>                                 51,126,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            97,923,000
<PP&E>                                     240,514,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             131,455,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             224,148,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       99,787,000
<BONDS>                                    127,807,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,246,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,375,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               224,148,000
<SALES>                                    148,902,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           148,902,000
<CGS>                                      120,439,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              120,439,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,387,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               294,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,664,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,396,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (893,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,503,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,503,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.14)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022284EN.01000901.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — FCC Česká republika, s.r.o. v Ministerstvo životního prostředí, Městská část Ďáblice, Spolek pro Ďáblice

(Case C-43/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2010/75/EU - Article 3(9) - Integrated pollution prevention and control - Procedure for amending a permit - Participation of the public concerned - Concept of ‘substantial change’ to the installation - Extension of the duration of operation of a landfill)

(2022/C 284/07)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: FCC Česká republika, s.r.o.

Defendants: Ministerstvo životního prostředí, Městská část Ďáblice, Spolek pro Ďáblice

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(9) of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) must be interpreted as meaning that the mere extension of the duration of waste disposal at a landfill, without any change in the maximum approved dimensions of the installation or its total capacity, does not constitute a ‘substantial change’ within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 110, 29.3.2021.

---
# C_2020201EN.01004701.xml

| 15.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/47

---

Action brought on 16 April 2020 — Frommer v EUIPO — Minerva (I-cosmetics)

(Case T-205/20)

(2020/C 201/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Angela Frommer (Unterschleißheim, Germany) (represented by: F. Remmertz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Minerva GmbH (Munich, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark I-cosmetics — European Union trade mark No 8 836 661

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2020 in Case R 675/2019-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party, if it joins the proceedings, to pay the costs, including those incurred by the Applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party, if it joins the proceedings, to pay the costs, including those incurred by the Applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Rule 22 of Commission Regulation (EC) 2868/95. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Rule 22 of Commission Regulation (EC) 2868/95.

---
# C_2020114EN.01001201.xml

| 6.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/12

---

Action brought on 30 January 2020 — IMI 2 Joint Undertaking v CHS

(Case T-53/20)

(2020/C 114/11)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: IMI 2 Joint Undertaking (represented by: D. Waelbroeck, A. Duron and F. Federici, lawyers)

Defendant: Choice Healthcare Solutions Ltd (Cardiff, United Kingdom)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | order the defendant to reimburse to the applicant EUR 128 996,04, plus interest, in relation to Grant Agreement 115011 regarding the project ‘PROactive — Physical Activity as a Crucial Patient Reported Outcome in COPD’, subject to interest at the rate applied by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations plus 3,5 % as of 23 July 2019, until the date of receipt of the funds to be reimbursed to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to reimburse to the applicant EUR 128 996,04, plus interest, in relation to Grant Agreement 115011 regarding the project ‘PROactive — Physical Activity as a Crucial Patient Reported Outcome in COPD’, subject to interest at the rate applied by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations plus 3,5 % as of 23 July 2019, until the date of receipt of the funds to be reimbursed to the applicant;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant concluded a grant agreement with the defendant regarding the project ‘PROactive — Physical Activity as a Crucial Patient Reported Outcome in COPD’.

In support of its application brought on the basis of Article 272 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the applicant relies on breaches of the conditions of the said grant agreement by the defendant with regard to the costs claimed by it.

---
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 30778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14159]



[[Page 30778]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

[F.C.S.C. Meeting and Hearing Notice No. 6-18]


Sunshine Act Meeting

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR part 503.25) and the Government in the Sunshine Act 
(5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
open meetings as follows:
    Tuesday, July 10, 2018: 10:00 a.m.--Issuance of Proposed Decisions 
in claims against Iraq.
    11:00 a.m.--Issuance of Proposed Decisions under the Guam World War 
II Loyalty Recognition Act, Title XVII, Public Law 114-328.
    Status: Open.
    All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 
601 D Street NW, Suite 10300, Washington, DC. Requests for information, 
or advance notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be 
directed to: Patricia M. Hall, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 
601 D Street NW, Suite 10300, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 
616-6975.

Brian M. Simkin,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2018-14159 Filed 6-27-18; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-BA-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 260 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 260

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 29, 1993.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order, 
any rule of the House to the contrary notwithstanding, to take from the 
Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 2493) making appropriations for Agriculture, 
Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes, with the 
Senate amendments to the House amendments to the Senate amendments numbered 29 
and 164 thereto, and to consider: (1) a motion that the House concur in the 
Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment numbered 29 with 
the amendment printed in section 2 of this resolution; and (2) a motion that the 
House concur in the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate 
amendment numbered 164 with the amendment printed in section 3 of this 
resolution. Each Senate amendment shall be considered as read. Each motion shall 
be debatable for one hour, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on each motion to final adoption without 
intervening motion.
    Sec. 2. The House amendment to the Senate amendment to the House amendment 
to the Senate amendment numbered 29 is as follows: In the matter proposed to be 
added by the Senate amendment, insert after the word ``operations'' the 
following: ``, except for marketing year 1993''.
    Sec. 3. The House amendment to the Senate amendment to the House amendment 
to the Senate amendment numbered 164 is as follows: In the matter proposed to be 
added by the Senate amendment, insert before the period at the end of section 
731 the following: ``, except in the case of the Food and Drug Administration''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF OCTOBER 2, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 2, 1999 FOR GENRAD, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AND ITS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,004
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,575
<INVENTORY>                                     44,513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               176,065
<PP&E>                                          83,314
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 276,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,340
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,744
<OTHER-SE>                                     147,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   276,351
<SALES>                                         91,482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               109,246
<CGS>                                           55,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,768
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,768
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,768
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60


</TABLE>