alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 Date:  October 27, 2008
    /s/Jeffrey S. GormanJeffrey S. GormanPresident and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) /s/Robert E. KirkendallRobert E. KirkendallSenior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)  21
# EUR-Lex - 51996IP0152 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 51996IP0152

**Resolution on the violation of the constitutional rights of the indigenous peoples of Brazil **

*
Official Journal C 065 , 04/03/1996 P. 0164 *

B4-0152, 0159, 0210 and 0228/96

Resolution on the violation of the constitutional rights of the indigenous peoples of Brazil

The European Parliament,

- having regard to its earlier resolutions on the need to protect the rights of the indigenous peoples of Brazil, in particular its resolution of 12 October 1995 ((OJ C 287, 30.10.1995, p. 202.)),

A. whereas indigenous peoples' 'native' right to their land is enshrined in the Brazilian Constitution,

B. recalling that the history of the struggle of the indigenous peoples to achieve institutional recognition of their rights has been a long and tragic one, punctuated by massacres and murders, and the demarcation of territory has been constantly accompanied by pressure being brought to bear on the authorities and by intimidation, illegal occupation, violence and murder,

C. noting that Decree 1775 establishes the right of any 'interested party' to challenge Indian possession of land reserved for them by Decree 22/91, but whose demarcation has not yet been fully completed in the Serviço do Património da União (land register), following pressure from powerful landowners, gold prospectors and mining and forestry companies, and whereas only half the land reserved for the indigenous peoples had been demarcated by 1995 and the demarcation process has been frozen,

1. Strongly condemns this decision, taken despite the clear requests of the European Parliament and the clearly stated opposition of the Brazilian public, many international organizations and the indigenous peoples' defence groups; supports all current initiatives calling for the revision of the federal decree and the anxieties expressed by the chairman of the Human Rights Committee of the Brazilian Congress and by other Brazilian groups providing assistance to indigenous peoples;

2. Calls on the Council and the Commission to make the Brazilian authorities aware of their disapproval, to demand guarantees concerning funding for the reserved areas in the context of the pilot programmes, and to make consideration of the position of the indigenous peoples an obligatory part of their political, economic and trade relations with Brazil;

3. Instructs its Delegation for relations with South America to raise this matter with its Brazilian colleagues at the earliest opportunity;

4. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the President and the Government of Brazil, the Chairman of the Human Rights Committee of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the Council of the Indigenous Peoples of Brazil and the National Forum for the Defence of Indigenous Rights.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL NOZZI, an individual;

NIDIA PELAEZ, an individual; LOS

ANGELES COALITION TO END

HUNGER AND HOMELESSNESS, a

non-profit organization, on behalf of

themselves and similarly situated

persons,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY

OF LOS ANGELES; RUDOLPH

MONTIEL, in his official capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 13-56223

D.C. No.

2:07-cv-00380-

GW-FFM

ORDER

Filed January 29, 2016

Before: Stephen Reinhardt and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit

Judges and Miranda M. Du,* District Judge.

* The Honorable Miranda M. Du, District Judge for the U.S. District

Court for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.
2 NOZZI V. HACLA

ORDER

The opinion filed November 30, 2015, and appearing at

806 F.3d 1178 (9th Cir. 2015), is hereby amended as follows:

1. Slip op. at 47, line 2: after “to ‘preserve the appearance of

justice’” but before the end of the sentence and the citation

Id., insert: “and avoid any suggestion that the district judge

originally assigned to the case designated the judge to whom

the case is reassigned.”

2. Slip op. at 47, line 2: after the Id. citation that now

follows the above amendment, insert the following footnote: 

“By this order, we imply no concern that the two judges

would be less than fully objective and fair were the case

reassigned to them. We are also aware that any assignment

would be made in a random manner under the regular

procedures of the district court and would in no way be

influenced by Judge Wu’s suggestion. It is solely the public

perception of unfairness that concerns us.”

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the

petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en

banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for

rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on

whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. 

The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are

DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or petitions for

rehearing en banc will be entertained.

The petition for leave to file a late, oversized brief of

amicus curiae on behalf of the Housing and Development

Law Institute is also DENIED.
H. Res. 279

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

October 20, 1993.

Resolved, That during the consideration of amendments

reported from conference in disagreement on the bill (H.R.

2520) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September

30, 1994, and for other purposes, motions printed in the

joint explanatory statement of the committee of conference to

dispose of amendments in disagreement, and the motion

printed in section 2 of this resolution, shall be considered as

read. Points of order under clause 7 of rule XVI against the

motions printed in the joint explanatory statement of the

committee of conference to dispose of the amendments of the

Senate numbered 10, 24, 81, 102, 123, and 125, and the motion printed in section 2 of this resolution to dispose of the

amendment of the Senate numbered 18, are waived.

SEC. 2. The motion to dispose of the amendment of the

Senate numbered 18 is as follows:
2

HRES 279 EH

‘‘Mr. Yates moves that the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 18,

and concur therein with an amendment, as follows:

‘‘In lieu of the matter proposed by said amendment, insert ‘: Provided, That none of the funds under this head shall

be used to conduct new surveys on private property unless

specifically authorized in writing by the property owner’.’’.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and South Broward Hospital District, Petitioners, v. Artie KITTRELL, Respondent.

No. 69-788.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

March 11, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
#### Samuel C. Grudberg, an Infant, by Isaac B. Grudberg, Guardian ad litem, Appellant, *v.*George Ehret, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

March, 1913.)

Negligence — automobile accident — appeal.

Where, in an action for personal injuries, it appears that while defendant’s automobile was at a standstill in a public street, plaintiff after pulling out abother boy’s foot which was stuck between barrels on the automobile then jumped off, the fact that without warning the automobile backed up a hill a distance of five feet running over plaintiff and injuring him calls for some explanation by defendant; and a judgment entered on the dismissal of the complaint ait the close of plaintiff’s case will be reversed.

Appeal■ by the plaintiff from a judgment of the City Court of the city of Mew York, entered upon a dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s evidence.

*628Jacob Grudberg (Clayton J. Heermance, of counsel), for appellant.

' Ashbel P. Pitch, Mott & Grant (Grant 0. Fox, of counsel), for respondent.

Gerard, J.

The evidence offered by plaintiff disclosed that plaintiff and another boy ran after defendant’s automobile, and the other boy jumped on it, and then when some one yelled “ Get off,” the other boy tried to get off, but in getting down got stuck between the barrels on the automobile and the plaintiff went to his assistance and pulled out his foot. At this time the automobile had stopped, and, the friend being free, plaintiff jumped off, but just at this time the automobile, without warning, backed up hill a distance of five feet, running over the plaintiff.

It makes no difference whether the friend was a trespasser on the automobile, or whether plaintiff came to his assistance or not. The plaintiff had a right to be in the public street. The automobile of defendant was at a stop and the unexplained sudden backing of the automobile, without any warning, calls at least for some explanation on the part of the defendant. See Lundy v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 1 Misc. Rep. 100 ; Smith v. American Ice Co., 152 App. Div. 484.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Seabuby and Bijub, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 364

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses

of investigations and studies by the Committee on Post Office and

Civil Service in the second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 22, 1994

Mr. CLAY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House

for expenses of investigations and studies by the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service in the second session

of the One Hundred Third Congress.

1 Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and

2 studies by the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

3 (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Commit4 tee’’), including expenses for procurement of consultant

5 services under section 202(i) of the Legislative Reorga6 nization Act of 1946, there shall be paid out of the contin7 gent fund of the House not more than $1,889,736.
2

HRES 364 IH

1 (b) Not more than $60,000 of the amount specified

2 in subsection (a) may be used for consultant services re3 ferred to in such subsection.

4 SEC. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made

5 on vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

6 Chairman of the Committee, and approved by the Commit7 tee on House Administration.

8 SEC. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolu9 tion for investigations and studies carried out during the

10 period beginning at noon on January 3, 1994, and ending

11 immediately before noon on January 3, 1995.

12 SEC. 4. Amount made available under this resolution

13 shall be expended in accordance with regulations pre14 scribed by the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-80007, 333-21341, 333-29517, 33-56525, 333-44087 and 333-85845) on Form
S-8 of ACT Networks, Inc. of our report dated July 26, 1999 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of ACT Networks, Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1999.



Woodland Hills, California
September 24, 1999


                                       39
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
                                  Exhibit 27.1

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE GOLD STANDARD, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS
REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENT
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                       APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                                               2,230,000
<SECURITIES>                                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           13,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     2,257,295
<PP&E>                                                                 281,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         227,750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       2,744,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    6,978
<BONDS>                                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                                 1,269
<OTHER-SE>                                                           2,735,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         2,744,008
<SALES>                                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                             0
<CGS>                                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       339,725
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       (245,126)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   (245,126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          (245,126)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                              (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            (0.20)


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 69/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.069.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 69 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 543 March 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.069.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 69

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 543 March 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 069/01 | Commission Decision of 22 February 2011 concerning the adoption of a financing decision for 2011 in the framework of the second programme of Community action in the field of health (2008-2013) and on the selection, award and other criteria for financial contributions to the actions to this programme (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 069/01

Commission Decision of 22 February 2011 concerning the adoption of a financing decision for 2011 in the framework of the second programme of Community action in the field of health (2008-2013) and on the selection, award and other criteria for financial contributions to the actions to this programme (1)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 131 (Monday, July 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on Mechanical 
Stratigraphy and Natural Deformation in the Permian Strata of Texas and 
New Mexico: Implications for Exploitation of the Permian Basin

    Notice is hereby given that, on May 30, 2018, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research Institute--
Cooperative Research Group on Mechanical Stratigraphy and Natural 
Deformation in the Permian Strata of Texas and New Mexico: Implications 
for Exploitation of the Permian Basin (``Permian Basin'') has filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, CONOCOPHILLIPS 
Company, Houston, TX, has been added as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Permian Basin intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 18, 2017, Permian Basin filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on May 12, 2017 (82 FR 22159).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 9, 2018. 
A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act on May 25, 2018 (83 FR 24347).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-14572 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 12

GTE Southwest Incorporated
STATEMENT OF THE RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Nine Months Ended
                                                                    September 30, 1997
                                                                   ---------------------

<S>                                                                <C>
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income from continuing operations                                $             230,596
  Add - Income taxes                                                             118,717
      - Fixed charges                                                             49,334
                                                                   ---------------------
Adjusted earnings                                                  $             398,647
                                                                   =====================

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                                 $              46,046
  Portion of rent expense
      representing interest                                                        3,288
                                                                   ---------------------
Adjusted fixed charges                                             $              49,334
                                                                   =====================

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                                  8.08
</TABLE>
#### A. G. STOKES v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 46950.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 30, 1972.

Peter Lalat, Biloxi, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by J. B. Garretty, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, SMITH, ROBERTSON and SUGG, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Harrison County; Leslie B. Grant, Judge.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.3



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Anthony P. Walsh, certify that:



I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Miramar Mining Corporation;



1.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



2.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



3.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                             
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2005 |  | By: |  | Anthony P. Walsh

Anthony P. Walsh
Chief Executive Officer