alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11
                          GENRAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Three Months Ended                 Six Months Ended
                                           -----------------------------   ----------------------------
                                                 July 4,        June 28,        July 4,        June 28,
                                                    1998            1997           1998            1997
                                           -------------    ------------   ------------    ------------
<S>                                        <C>              <C>            <C>             <C>         
Basic earnings per share:

Net (loss) income available to
    common stockholders                    $ (11,940,000)   $  7,921,000   $ (3,032,000)   $ 19,638,000
                                           =============    ============   ============    ============

Weighted average number of
   common shares outstanding                  28,286,000      26,697,000     27,887,000      26,414,000
                                           =============    ============   ============    ============

Basic earnings per share                   $       (0.42)   $       0.30   $      (0.11)   $       0.74
                                           =============    ============   ============    ============

Diluted earnings per share:

Net (loss) income available to
   common stockholders                     $ (11,940,000)   $  7,921,000   $ (3,032,000)   $ 19,638,000
                                           =============    ============   ============    ============

Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding                         28,286,000      26,697,000     27,887,000      26,414,000

Weighted average incremental shares from
the assumed conversion of stock options
   and restricted stock awards                      --         1,480,000           --         1,682,000
                                           -------------    ------------   ------------    ------------
          Total:                              28,286,000      28,177,000     27,887,000      28,096,000
                                           =============    ============   ============    ============

Diluted earnings per share                 $       (0.42)   $       0.28   $      (0.11)   $       0.70
                                           =============    ============   ============    ============

</TABLE>
[No. 553-2.

Division Two.

December 22, 1971.]

#### Darrell John Dedo *et al., Respondents,*v. Jacob J. David *et al., Appellants,*Tom MacPherson Realty, *Respondent.*
AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Hedges, Controller and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 31, 2009



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ David A. Hedges                       
|                                          
|David A. Hedges                           
|VP, Controller and Chief Financial Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 927

To designate the Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania as the

National Aviary in Pittsburgh.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 17, 1993

Mr. COYNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

A BILL

To designate the Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh,

Pennsylvania as the National Aviary in Pittsburgh.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is

5 designated as the ‘‘National Aviary in Pittsburgh’’.

6 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in any law, regulation, document,

8 record, map, or other paper of the United States to the

9 aviary referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘National Aviary in Pittsburgh’’.
2

•HR 927 IH

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1191

MUZEM ACHA TITUS,

 Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: August 29, 2022 Decided: September 20, 2022

Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Danielle L.C. Beach, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW 

ASSOCIATES PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant 

Attorney General, Shelley Goad, Assistant Director, Kristin Moresi, Trial Attorney, Office 

of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1191 Doc: 27 Filed: 09/20/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Muzem Acha Titus, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an 

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the 

Immigration Judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, 

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have thoroughly

reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to 

any of the administrative factual findings, see U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial 

evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re 

Titus (B.I.A. Jan. 27, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1191 Doc: 27 Filed: 09/20/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GeneLink, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Monte E. Taylor, Jr., as
Acting Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods shown in such report.


Date: April 7, 2006                     By: /s/ Monte E. Taylor, Jr.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Monte E. Taylor, Jr., Acting Chief
                                            Executive Officer and Acting Chief
                                            Financial Officer
#### ATLAS PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. John V. DIDICH, as Administrator of the Estate of Kay Didich, a minor, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 67-973.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 12, 1967.

Dixon, Dejarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell, Miami, for appellant.

Stephens, Demos & Magill, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellee has petitioned this court for review of a supersedeas order entered by the trial court. See rule 5.10 F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.

An unsecured money judgment was entered against the defendant in the court below in the amount of $75,000, based on a verdict which awarded to the plaintiff John V. Didich individually the sum of $20,-000, and to the plaintiff in his capacity as administrator of the estate of Kay Didich, deceased, awarded $20,000 compensatory damages and $35,000 punitive damages.

The defendant made a partial payment of $20,000 on the judgment, to Didich individually, and paid the adjudged costs. The defendant then appealed, naming as appellee Didich in his capacity as administrator. On the appellant’s application to the trial court for an order fixing the amount and conditions of supersedeas bond, the trial court entered the order which is now under review, in which it was provided that the appeal should operate as a stay *29or supersedeas of the unpaid balance of the judgment ($55,000) upon filing a bond in the amount of $25,000, “conditioned as required by law.”

The appellee contends that the supersede-as bond was required to be for the full amount of the judgment remaining unpaid, plus such sum as the trial court should require in addition for interest and costs, citing rule 5.7 F.A.R., and § 59.13 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The appellant argues that it was within the discretion of the trial judge to grant a stay or supersedeas of this unsecured money judgment without requiring a supersedeas bond for the full amount thereof remaining unpaid.

Florida Appellate Rule 5.7, relied on by the appellee, is clear and definite to the effect that on supersedeas of such a; money judgment “the bond shall be conditioned to satisfy the judgment or decree or any modification not increasing the amount thereof, in full, including costs, interest (if chargeable), and damages for delay, in event the appeal be dismissed or the judgment, order or decree is affirmed.” Section 59.13(3) Fla.Stat., F.S.A. is to like effect.

We hold, as contended for by the appel-lee, that the supersedeas order entered by the trial court failed to satisfy the requirements of the cited rule and statute. Accordingly, the challenged order is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to enter an order fixing the amount and conditions of supersedeas bond as provided for in such case by rule 5.7 F.A.R., and § 59.13(3) Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; whereupon, the appellant may elect to proceed with its appeal without supersedeas, or to supersede the judgment by filing bond as so required.

It is so ordered.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BONTEX,
INC.'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AS SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         349
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                   195
<INVENTORY>                                    7,023
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20,111
<PP&E>                                         24,634
<DEPRECIATION>                                 12,777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 33,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19,899
<BONDS>                                        2,383
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       157
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   33,031
<SALES>                                        28,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               29,003
<CGS>                                          21,922
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  29,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               24
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               144
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,240)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (388)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (852)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (852)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.54)
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14280]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 83 FR 29582, 25 Jun 
2018.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: Thursday, June 28, 
2018 at 10:00 a.m.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The following item will not be considered 
during the Open Meeting on Thursday, June 28, 2018:
    <bullet> Whether the Commission should enter into a revised 
memorandum of understanding with the Commodity Futures Trading 
Commission that would update and supersede the existing regulatory 
coordination memorandum of understanding between the two agencies.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: June 28, 2018.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14280 Filed 6-28-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 130 (Friday, July 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14492]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Management 
Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The 
grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential 
trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention 
and Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--DP19-001, Health Promotion 
and Disease Prevention Research Centers.
    Dates: August 26-30, 2018.
    Times: August 26, 2018, 4:00 p.m.-7:00 p.m., EDT and August 27-
30, 2018, 8:30 a.m.-6:30 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton 
Road NE, Global Communications Center, Auditorium B, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30333.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Jaya Raman Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop F80, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-6511, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6308150256230007004d040c15"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0368756236436067602d646c75">[email protected]</span></a>.

    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine Baker
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2018-14492 Filed 7-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0801 Directorate Identifier: 2012

-NM

- 106

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet
Inspection 7.0 $ 595.00 $0 $ 595.00 200 $119,000.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: 0 

### Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $119,000 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

Replacement 7.0 $ 595.00 

### $ 29,289 $29,884.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic **Analysis** ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : On Condition replacement cost does not include flight test costs.

### E **xecutive Order 12866:**

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
#### Dwight BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1169.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 21, 1972.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Bennett H. Brummer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Barry Scott Richard, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Mead v. State, Fla.1956, 86 So.2d 773; State v. Graham, Fla.1970, 238 So.2d 618.
#### Patricia Ann PEARSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-1121.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 22, 1978.

ORDERED, sua sponte, the Appellant herein having failed to file an Affidavit of Insolvency for purposes of this appeal or having failed to pay the required Fifty ($50.00) and 00/100 Dollars service charge (filing fee) within Twenty (20) days after the entry of this Court’s May 25, 1978 Order, the above-styled cause, commenced by the filing of a Notice of Appeal on May 9, 1978 in Palm Beach County Circuit Court Case No. 77-1260 CF, is hereby dismissed. (See *Williams v. State,*Fla., 324 So.2d 74, 77 note 3 [1975]).
INDEX TO EXHIBITS

    10.1   Global Marine 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.

    10.2   Form of Performance Stock Memorandum dated February 10,
           1998 regarding conditional opportunity to acquire Company
           stock granted to eight executive officers, respectively,
           and dated May 5, 1998 regarding conditional opportunity
           to acquire Company stock granted to one executive officer.

    10.3   Employment Agreement dated May 5, 1998, among the Company,
           Global Marine Corporate Services Inc., and Robert E. Rose.

    10.4   Shipbuilding Contract dated 27 February 1998 relating to
           Hull No. 1739 between Harland and Wolff Shipbuilding and
           Heavy Industries Limited and Global Marine International
           Services Corporation.

    10.5   Shipbuilding Contract dated 28 March 1998 relating to Hull
           No. 1740 between Harland and Wolff Shipbuilding and Heavy
           Industries Limited and Global Marine International Services
           Corporation.

    15.1   Letter of Independent Accountants regarding Awareness of
           Incorporation by Reference.

    27.1   Financial Data Schedule.  (Exhibit 27.1 is being submitted
           as an exhibit only in the electronic format of this
           Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q being submitted to the
           Securities and Exchange Commission.  Exhibit 27.1 shall
           not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 of the
           Securities Act of 1933, Section 18 of the Securities
           Exchange Act of 1934 or Section 323 of the Trust Indenture
           Act, or otherwise be subject to the liabilities of such
           sections, nor shall it be deemed a part of any registration
           statement to which it relates.)
#### The LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, Appellant, v. TOWER 2450, INC., etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 77-423.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 27, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 2, 1978.

Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann & Jennings and Tom E. Scott, Jr., and Frank A. Shepherd, Miami, for appellant.

Leo Greenfield, North Miami, Friedman & Britton and Ed A. Kaufman, Samuel Fletcher, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

*1224PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. Baumgartner,*99 Fla. 987, 128 So. 241 (1930); *Lehman v. Trust Co. of America,*57 Fla. 473, 49 So. 502 (Fla.1909).