alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023007EN.01001301.xml

| 9.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 November 2022 — Laboratoire Pareva v Biotech3D Ltd & Co. KG, European Commission, French Republic, European Chemicals Agency

(Case C-702/21 P) (1)

(Appeal - Biocidal products - Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 - Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 - Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) - Refusal of approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 1, 5 and 6 - Approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 4 - Teratogenic effect - Human health risk assessment)

(2023/C 7/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Laboratoire Pareva (represented by S. Englebert, M. Grunchard and M. Ombredane, avocats, P. Sellar, advocaat, and by K. Van Maldegem, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: Biotech3D Ltd & Co. KG, European Commission (represented by R. Lindenthal and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents), French Republic (represented by G. Bain and J.-L. Carré, acting as Agents), European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by C. Buchanan, M. Heikkilä and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Laboratoire Pareva to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Laboratoire Pareva to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.

---
#### Frank F. WEBER, Jr., Appellant, v. Betty E. WEBER, Appellee.

No. 71-214.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 30, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; James F. Minnet, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
No. 10687.

#### Kelly *v.*Kelly et al.

Decided February 2, 1909.

Error to Circuit Court of Hardin county.

*Messrs. Smick. & Hoge,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Stickle & Cessna*and *Mr. John H. Clark,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, C. J., Summers, Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur.
#### Duncan W. SINCLAIR, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-19.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 22, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 20, 1973.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction, entered pursuant to jury verdict, of murder in the second degree.

Our examination of the record and consideration of the briefs submitted by the parties indicate that no reversible error was committed in arriving at the judgment appealed herein. The same is accordingly affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
# September 2021
#### IMMEL *v.*STATE

[No. 277,

September Term, 1961.]

*Decided May 10, 1962.*

The cause was argued before Hbndbrson, Hammond, PrBscott, Marbury and Sybbrt, JJ.

*Walter M. Baker*for the appellant.

*567
      *Gerard Wm. Wittstadt, Assistant Attorney General,*with whom were *Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General,*and /. *Albert Roney, Jr., State’s Attorney for Cecil County,*on the brief, for the appellee.

Per Curiam.

The sole question herein involved is a narrow one: Did the evidence offered at the trial below establish that the appellant obtained from the National Bank of Rising Sun (Bank) “any chattel, money or valuable security” within the meaning of Code (1961 Cum. Supp.), Article 27, Section 140 ?

There is no dispute concerning the facts. Appellant was convicted under four counts of an indictment, which charged four different offenses. As a result of certain false pretenses of past or existing facts made by appellant, the Bank credited his account in said Bank with four “deposits.” However, the State failed to show that the appellant ever drew upon any of said deposits, that the Bank ever actually parted with the title or possession of anything of value, or that it suffered any loss.

A bank owns the money deposited with it, subject to the right of the depositors to draw upon it. *Keller v. Frederickstown Sav. Inst.,*193 Md. 292, 66 A. 2d 924; *Horwitz v. Ellinger,*31 Md. 492. In order to obtain a conviction in this case, it was necessary that it be shown that the false representations induced a transfer and the obtaining of the “chattel, money or valuable security” by the appellant. *Willis v. State,*205 Md. 118, 106 A. 2d 85; *Simmons v. State,*165 Md. 155, 167 A. 60; 35 C.J.S. *False Pretenses,*§ 24. We hold that the mere showing of the obtaining of the credits to appellant’s bank account, standing alone, is insufficient to support a conviction of obtaining “any chattel, money or valuable security,” with intent to defraud, *Maxey v. State,*85 Ark. 499. Cf. *Willis v. State, Simmons v. State,*and 35 C.J.S., *False Pretenses,*§ 24, all *supra.*

The Assistant Attorney General, with commendable candor, stated that, in his opinion, the evidence was insufficient to *568support the conviction, but felt that the question should be submitted for our decision.

*Judgment reversed and case remanded for a new trial; the costs to be paid by the county commissioners of Cecil County.*
# INSTRUCTIONS

# 531110 LT Lodging
#### Malcolm Eugene GILE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-118.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 11, 1971.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Norman J. Kapner, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Rodney Durrance, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the briefs and record (oral argument having been waived) we find no error and, therefore, affirm the judgment below.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Annual Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the Operating Partnership) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward J. Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of Highwoods Properties Inc., general partner of the Operating
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ EDWARD J. FRITSCH                                       
|Edward J. Fritsch                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
|October 6, 2006
5-3.D

COMPANY:  Global Marine Inc. (the "Company")

ITEM:     Resolutions of the Board of Directors

SUBJECT:  Termination of Retirement Plan for Outside Directors

DATE:     August 11, 1999


          RESOLVED that the Company's Retirement Plan for Outside
Directors be and hereby is terminated effective the day immediately
preceding the day on which directors are elected at the Company's
annual meeting of stockholders in 2000 and that the present value
of the then-accrued benefit of each participant who is not then
receiving a benefit under the plan be paid to such participant in
the form of a lump sum cash payment, but that each benefit then
being paid under the plan continue to be paid to such recipient, in
such form, and at such time or times as such benefit would have
been paid but for said termination; and it was further

          RESOLVED that, in calculating the present value of
accrued benefits of participants in the Retirement Plan for Outside
Directors for the purpose of determining the amounts of the lump
sum cash payments authorized by the immediately preceding
resolution, (a) a discount rate of six percent be applied, (b) each
participant entitled to receive such payment be deemed to be fully
vested in an accrued benefit under the plan, (c) each such
participant be credited with his service through May 2000, and (d)
each such participant be deemed to have attained age 65; and it was
further

          RESOLVED that the proper officers of the Company be and
hereby are authorized and directed to do or cause to be done any
and all such further acts and things, make any and all such
payments, and negotiate, execute and deliver, for and on behalf of
the Company and in its name, any and all such documents, papers,
instruments and agreements as they may deem necessary or desirable
to effect the intent and purposes of these resolutions.
p130075.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0075

Focus Ready Draft 11/19/2012

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ AH

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1
p130075.eng

 

SAT (concerns) (11/09/2012):

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P1B1T1

Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1ppb,

amide SAR), XB Testing (Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 2
p130075.eng

Page 3
p130075.eng

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0075

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 4
p130075.eng

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0075

 

 

 

Page 5
p130075.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 6
p130075.eng

 

 

 

 

 7
H. Res. 454

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

June 16, 1994.

Resolved, That points of order against consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4556) making appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal

year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes, for

failure to comply with clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI or clause 7

of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of the bill, all

points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to

comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are waived except as

follows: beginning on page 53, line 9, through page 54, line

22.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 484 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 484

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 21, 1994.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 4604) to establish direct spending targets, and for other purposes. 
The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and the amendments made in order by this resolution and 
shall not exceed one hour, with thirty minutes equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Rules and thirty 
minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Government Operations. After general debate the bill 
shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in 
order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the 
five-minute rule an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the 
text of the bill modified by the amendment printed in part 1 of the report of 
the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. That amendment in the 
nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. No other amendment shall be 
in order except those printed in part 2 of the report of the Committee on Rules. 
Each amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be 
offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, 
shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment 
except as specified in the report, and shall not be subject to a demand for 
division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All 
points of order against the amendments printed in part 2 of the report are 
waived. If more than one of the amendments printed in part 2 of the report is 
adopted, only the last to be adopted shall be considered as finally adopted and 
reported to the House. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 
amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such 
amendments as may have been finally adopted. Any Member may demand a separate 
vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the 
bill or to the amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order as original 
text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  219,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,400
<INVENTORY>                                     18,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               231,600
<PP&E>                                       3,600,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,235,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,721,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          393,100
<BONDS>                                        670,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       448,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,721,100
<SALES>                                        865,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               865,400
<CGS>                                          274,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  562,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                260,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                    95,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            164,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  3,100
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   161,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 15




To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Gerber Scientific, Inc.


            Re: Registration Statements on Form S-8,
                File No. 2-93695, No. 33-58668,
                No. 333-26177, No. 333-42879,
                No. 333-81447, No. 333-83463, and
                No. 333-39754

                Registration Statement on Form S-3,
                File No. 33-58670


With   respect   to  the  subject  Registration  Statements,   we
acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report  dated
August  16,  2000  related  to our review  of  interim  financial
information.

Pursuant  to  Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act, such  reports
are not considered a part of a Registration Statement prepared or
certified  by an accountant or a report prepared or certified  by
an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



/s/ KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP


Hartford, Connecticut
September 13, 2000
# STATE OF LOUISIANA



# COURTOF APPEAL, FIRSTCIRCUIT

JOHNNY COVINGTON VERSUS CLARK SAND CO., INC.; CLEMCO INDUSTRIES CORPORATION F/K/ A CLEMCO SERVICES CORP.; DEPENDABLE ABRASIVES, INC.; E.D. BULLARD COMPANY; EMPIRE ABRASIVE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, L.P.; LEHIGH HANSON, INC. ( A SUBSIDIARY OF HEIDELBERGCEMENT GROUP) F/K/ A HANSON AGGREGATES, INC. F/K/ A HANSON AGGREGATES CENTRAL, INC. F/K/ A PIONEER SOUTH CENTRAL, INC. F/K/ A PIONEER CONCRETE OF TEXAS, INC.; INGERSOLL-RAND CORPORATION; LEROI COMPRESSOR A/K/ A ROTARY COMPRESSION TECHNOLOGIES; 3M COMPANY; RUEMELIN MANUFACTURING CO., INC.; SANSTORM, INC.; BOB SCHMIDT MANUFACTURING, INC.; SOUTHERN SILICA OF LOUISIANA, INC.; SPECIALTY SAND COMPANY; SULLAIR COMPRESSOR CORPORATION; AND TXI OPERATIONS, L.P. NO. 2022 CW 1204



### MARCH 6, 2023

In Re: Empire Abrasive Equipment Company, L.P., applying for

supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 649436.
BEFORE: WELCH, PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. AHP WIL Welch, J., dissents and would issue a briefing schedule.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14227]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[CDC-2018-0006; Docket Number NIOSH-306]


Final National Occupational Research Agenda for Services

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 
of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NIOSH announces the availability of the final National 
Occupational Research Agenda for Services.

DATES: The final document was published on June 26, 2018.

ADDRESSES: The document may be obtained at the following link: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/nora/sectors/serv/agenda.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Novicki, M.A., M.P.H, 
(<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#256b6a7764664a4a57414c4b44514a57654641460b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="743a3b2635371b1b06101d1a15001b06341710175a131b02">[email protected]</span></a>), National Institute for Occupational Safety 
and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop E-20, 
1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, phone (404) 498-2581 (not a 
toll free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 29, 2018, NIOSH published a 
request for public review in the Federal Register [83 FR 4058] of the 
draft version of the National Occupational Research Agenda for 
Services. All comments received were reviewed and addressed where 
appropriate.

John J. Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2018-14227 Filed 7-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2020287EN.01004601.xml

| 31.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/46

---

Action brought on 17 July 2020 — SBG v EUIPO — VF International (GEOGRAPHICAL NORWAY)

(Case T-461/20)

(2020/C 287/67)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Super Brand Licencing (SBG) (Villeurbanne, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and A. Sion, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: VF International Sagl (Stabio, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark GEOGRAPHICAL NORWAY — EU trade mark No 11 048 147

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 April 2020 in Case R 661/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs, including the costs incurred by the applicant in respect of the proceedings before the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs, including the costs incurred by the applicant in respect of the proceedings before the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, by reason of the incorrect assessment of the existence of bad faith at the time when the application for the mark was filed. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, by reason of the incorrect assessment of the existence of bad faith at the time when the application for the mark was filed.

---