alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
14eFR ParI 39 [4910-13-PJ

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON Federal Aviation Administration



# O'll61 IDocket No. F'-2oq'2.*

# Zr**; Di7~t~/ite Identifier 2010-NM-17I-AD; Amendment 

# 39_'1tL ;AD 2010-**-**) RlN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2CIO (Regional Jet Series 700,701, & 702); Model CL-600-2Dl5 (Regional Jet Series 705); and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule; request forcomments. SUM:MARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the products list uT~C SYMOOL

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAn An originated by an aviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl d~scribes the unsafe condition as: During maintenance atthe vendor's facility, some HSTAs [horizontal stabilizer trim actuators] were assembled with the incorrect load bearing balls. The materi ofthese discrepant balls has lower wear characteristics and as such, has a shorte expected life. Ifnot corrected, this condition can result inthe HSTAjam leadin to difficulties in controlling the aircraft. \;TING .YMIlO\.



## * 

## * * 

## * * 

## * * * The unsafe condition ispossible loss ofcontrollability ofthe airplane. This AD require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described inthe MeAl. 

### ,~149111-13-1'1 ,-<)X<:"H"J
.."'<:' ~·_"rr"",·; •. """. DEI' ARTMENT OJ1TRANSI'ORTA nON Fcderl1l Aviation Admillistration
14

## em 1'.,-1 39 ANE-171 Il>ockct No. FAA-20lO~**"'**; Directorate I*ntificr 2010wNMw171 wAD; Amendmen( 39~***"""; AD 2010-**-**1 '~"'~lS"v C. ·\jr'HI(

# ...- :?/O~/J<,tO
ANE-171 RfN 2120-AA64 Ainvorthincss Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Rcgional.lct Series 700, 70J, & 702); Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705); and Model 

## " , to ANE·J I

11-"" 

### .".;",..

# ..'-'"~ 

# •.

• • • • 

# • • 

# • • This AI) rcqHir~s actions that arc intended to address the unsafe condition described in tondilion on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: I During maintenance at the vendor's facility, some HSTAs lhorizontal stabiliz~
.. r trim actuator] were assembled with the incorrect load bearing balls. The matcriul of these discrepant balls has lower wear characteristics and as such, has ashorler CXPCCll..-d

lile. If not corrected, this condition can result ill the HS-rA jam lending to difficulties incontrolling the aircral\
. origiD<ltcd

hy till_asi<tlion authority of another country to identify and correct un unsaJe above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation

SUMMARY; We arc adopting anew airworthiness directive (1\0) forthe products li~[ed ~ AcnON: Finnl rule; rcquc:;t forcomments. (DOT). CL-600~2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes

the MeAl.
# C_2022222EN.01000401.xml

| 7.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/4

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 31 January 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi — Poland) — TM v EJ

(Case C-28/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles - Directive 2009/103/EC - Article 3 - Compulsory cover of damage to property - Scope - Legislation of a Member State excluding loss of earnings from cover by compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles)

(2022/C 222/05)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: TM

Defendant: EJ

Operative part of the order

Must the first paragraph of Article 3 of Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability be interpreted as not precluding a provision of national law under which compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles does not cover damage consisting of loss of earnings, on condition that that limitation of cover applies without any difference in treatment depending on the Member State of residence of the injured party or of the owner or holder of the damaged vehicle.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 10.5.2021.

---
# Official Journal L 88/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 88 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6624 March 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 88

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6624 March 2023

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2023/675 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2023 laying down conservation and management measures for the conservation of southern bluefin tuna | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2023/675 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2023 laying down conservation and management measures for the conservation of southern bluefin tuna

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 05a0111n.06 Filed: February 14, 2005 No. 04-3006 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RICHARD ENGLAND, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. TIMOTHY E. BIGHAM, Defendant-Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Before: SUHRHEINRICH, ROGERS, and COOK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Timothy Bigham appeals the dist rict court’s order denying summary judgment to the defendant. After reviewing the record, the par ties’ briefs, and the applicable law, this court determines that no jurisprudential purpose woul d be served by a panel opinion and affirms the district court’s decision for the reas ons stated in that court’s opinion.
Exhibit 10.4


 


Supplementary Agreement


 


	Lessor:	Neighborhood Committee of Dongqili Community, Caiyuan Street, Taishan District, Tai’an City (hereinafter referred to as “Party A”)
	 	 
	Lessee:	Tai’an Tony Fun Shopping Mall Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Party B”)


 


Per friendly consultation, in the spirit
of mutual benefit and reciprocity as well as mutual understanding and mutual accommodation, and based on the “Lease”
and “Supplementary Agreement” signed by both parties on June 28, 2013 and July 28, 2017 respectively, both parties
hereby agree unanimously to amend the amount of rent as follows:


 


		1.	Party B has paid RMB 2,105,098 in total to Party A for the rent.



 


		2.	Both parties will not amend the paid rent as mentioned above, however, for the rent through July
31, 2021, both parties agree that:



 


		1)	The amount of rent from August 1, 2016 to July 31, 2017 is RMB 2,105,098.



 


		2)	The amount of rent from August 1, 2017 to July 31, 2018 is RMB 2,105,098.



 


		3)	The amount of rent from August 1, 2018 to July 31, 2019 is RMB 2,455,948.



 


		4)	The amount of rent from August 1, 2019 to July 31, 2020 is RMB 2,455,948.



 


		5)	The amount of rent from August 1, 2020 to July 31, 2021 is RMB 4,093,246.



 


		3.	In case of any discrepancy among different versions, this Supplementary Agreement shall prevail
on the adjusted clauses, the unchanged clauses shall be performed pursuant to the previous agreements.



 


		4.	This Supplementary Agreement shall be performed beginning on July 6, 2018.



 


		5.	This Supplementary Agreement is made in quadruplicate, each party holds two copies respectively,
and it will come into effect after the signature of both parties.



 





		Party
                          A:	Neighborhood
Committee of Dongqili Community, Caiyuan Street, Taishan District, Tai’an City



 


	Authorized representative (Signature) /s/ Yunqing Cao
	 	 
	Date of signature: 	July 6, 2018







 





		Party
                          B:	Tai’an
Tony Fun Shopping Mall Co., Ltd.



 


	Authorized representative (Signature) /s/ Zhiqiang Han
	 
	Date of signature: 	July 6, 2018
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1



                         ACCOUNTANTS' AWARENESS LETTER



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated August 8, 2001, on our review of the
condensed consolidated interim financial information of Global Marine Inc. and
subsidiaries (the "Company") as of and for the period ended June 30, 2001, and
included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter then
ended is incorporated by reference in (i) the prospectus constituting part of
the Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-32088,
33-40961 and 33-63326), respectively, for the Global Marine Inc. 1989 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan and the Global Marine 1998 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan, (ii) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-80383, 333-40244, 33-32088,
33-40961, and 33-63326) for the Global Marine 1998 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan, (iii) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-40266) for the Global Marine Savings
Incentive Plan, (iv) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-40961) for the Global
Marine Inc. 1990 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, (v) the prospectus
constituting part of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 33-57691) for the Global Marine Inc. 1994 Non-Employee Stock
Option and Incentive Plan, (vi) the prospectus constituting part of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-40244) for
the Global Marine Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan, (vii) the
combined prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration Statements
on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 33-58577 and 333-49807) for the proposed offering
of up to $500,000,000 of debt securities, preferred stock and/or common stock,
and (viii) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-45908) for the resale of up to
$600,000,000 principal amount at maturity of Zero Coupon Convertible Debentures
due June 23, 2020, and shares of common stock of the Company issuable upon
conversion thereof.

Very truly yours,


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Houston, Texas
August 9, 2001
### Kruger, Brett (OST) From: Sent: To: 

### Cc: Robert F. Selig [rselig@craa.com] Monday, February20, 2012 5:57 PM Karen Erazo Alexander Vander Bellen; Carl Nelson; Daniel Weiss; Ed Faberman; Howard Kass; Jeff Manley; Joanne Young; Johnathan Hill; Marshall Sinick; Robert E. Cohn; Robert F. Selig; Stephen Morrissey; Rosenberg, Esta (OST); Hedberg, Brian (OST); Kruger, Brett (OST); Nicole Noll Subject: Re: Exemption Renewal Application 

### Lansinghas no objections and fully supports the application. Bob Selig ExecutiveDirector CapitalRegion AirportAuthority Lansing, MI48906 517-886-3711 OnFeb 20, 2012, at 5:21PM, "KarenErazo" <Karen.Erazo@suncountry.corn>wrote: MN Airlines, LLC d/b/a Sun CountryAirlines is filing the attached exemption renewal application with the US Departmet of Transportation today. In order to expedite action on the request, please provide a response as to whether or not you objectto this application by replying to this e-mail, Thankyou,

Karen Erazo Manager, Legal Affairs Phone: 651-681-3950 Fax: 651-681-3901 Book Online at www.suncountry.com!



### <OST-2002-12211 Renewal ExemptionApplication.pdf>

1
|   | a)  All      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,      process, summarize and report financial information;  and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b)  Any      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control      over financial reporting. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                | /s/ Michael R.      Elia                   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael      R. Elia Executive      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting      Officer(Principal      FinancialOfficer) |
EXHIBIT 99.9




CONSENT OFWARDROP ENGINEERING INC.





March 31, 2011





Brigus Gold Corp.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Brigus Gold Corp.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





We hereby consent to (i) the use of our name in connection with the following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 40-F”) of Brigus Gold Corp. (the “Company”) to which this consent relates: (A) the technical report entitled “Black Fox Project National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report” dated January 6, 2011 (the “Report”), (B) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2010 and (C) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2010, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-113889 and 333-162558), as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to us included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.





Sincerely,





Wardrop Engineering Inc.





/s/ Andrew MacKenzieName: Andrew MackenzieTitle:   Authorized person
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 348 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 348

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
 investigations and studies by the Committee on Foreign Affairs in the 
           second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 1994

Mr. Hamilton submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
 investigations and studies by the Committee on Foreign Affairs in the 
           second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

    Resolved, That for expenses of investigations and studies by the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs (hereinafter in the resolution referred to 
as the ``Committee''), there shall be paid out of the contingent fund 
of the House not more than $4,145,214.
    Sec. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers 
authorized by the Committee, signed by the chairman of the Committee, 
and approved by the Committee on House Administration.
    Sec. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolution for 
investigations and studies carried out during the period beginning at 
noon on January 3, 1994, and ending immediately before noon on January 
3, 1995.
    Sec. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution shall be 
expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on 
House Administration.

                                 <all>
```
|   | a)  All      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,      process, summarize and report financial information;  and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b)  Any      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control      over financial reporting. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                  |                    /s/      Michael R.      Elia                    |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael      R. Elia Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer) |
# Sheet1

# Sheet2

# image1.png
No. 11489.

#### Gayman et al. *v.*The State, ex rel. Rulison, Prosecuting Attorney.

Decided November 24, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Mr. Theodore IT or siman,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Frank F. Dins-more; Mr. IT. M. Rulison,*prosecuting attorney, and *Messrs. Doyle & Lewis,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew and Summers, JJ., concur.

Price, C. J. and Crew, J.,

concur on the sole ground that the

committee appointed under the joint resolution had no power to act after the final adjournment of the legislature which could not reconvene of its own motion.
#### Sol ROVIN, Appellant, v. Joseph A. GARFIELD, Janet Garfield, his wife, and the Continental Building of Miami, Inc., a Florida, corporation, Appellees.

No. 67-282.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 20, 1968.

Milton E. Grusmark and Natalie Baskin, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Nicholson, Howard, Brawner & Lovett, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in a suit for specific performance appeals a final judgment for the defendants. The suit prayed as follows:

> “1. That this Court take jurisdiction of the parties hereto and of the subject matter of this cause.

> “2. That upon final hearing hereof, this Court enter its appropriate decree mandatorily requiring Defendants, JOSEPH A. GARFIELD and JANET GARFIELD, his wife, to cause the conveyance of the real property described herein in accordance with the agreement between the parties, marked Exhibit ‘B’.

> “3. That upon final hearing hereof, this Court upon appropriate decree order and direct the Defendant, JOSEPH A. GARFIELD, to execute the agreement marked Exhibit ‘B’ and perform such other and further steps or execute such other and further documents as may be be necessary and proper to complete the apartment building project contemplated by said agreement.”

*11The trial court found (1) that no oral agreement or contract ever was reached between the plaintiff or any of the defendants relating to the subject matter of this action; (2) that if the parties had ever reached an oral agreement or contract, it-would have been within the purview of the Florida Statute of Frauds, § 725.01, Fla. Stat. F.S.A. and (3) that the equities in the action were with the defendants.

Our examination of the record and briefs convinces us that the decree is sustainable on any of the three grounds set forth. The final judgment is affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Webster Lumber Co. v. Lincoln, 94 Fla. 1097, 115 So. 498 (1927).

Affirmed.
#### James Henry HILLENGAS, Petitioner, v. Burton R. QUINN, Sheriff of Citrus County, Respondent.

No. 73-491.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 8, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
October 19, 2015

Mr. Michael C. Vogt

CEO Chief Scientist

North American Robotics

P.O. Box 818

Prior Lake, MN 55372

Dear Mr. Vogt :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Part 21 and § § 45.23(b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103(b)(2), 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a),

91.203(a)(b), 91.405(a), 407(a)(1), 409(a)(2), and 417(a)(b) of Ti tle 14, Code of Federal

Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should

do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request, posted to the public docket on July 22, 2015

, on behalf of

North American Robotics filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 3091 , but we are unable to process

your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81

(copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the

following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

a t least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34