Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2018
                              Laurie Diane Trainer, DAB CR5096 (2018)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Laurie Diane Trainer, DAB CR5096 (2018)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Laurie Diane Trainer,
	(O.I. File No.: H-17-40340-9),
	Petitioner,
v.
The Inspector General.
Docket No. C-18-229Decision No. CR5096May 14, 2018

        
              
    

      DECISION
Petitioner, Laurie Diane Trainer, was a registered nurse (R.N.) in the State of Florida.  The State of Florida Board of Nursing (State Board) found that Petitioner had violated the nursing practice statute by failing to meet minimal standards of acceptable and prevailing nursing practice.  Based on these findings, the State Board revoked Petitioner’s R.N. license.  Now, pursuant to section 1128(b)(4) of the Social Security Act (Act), the Inspector General (I.G.) has excluded Petitioner from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs until she regains her Florida R.N. license.
For the reasons set forth below, I find that Petitioner’s R.N. license was revoked for reasons bearing on her professional competence or professional performance.  The I.G. therefore had a legal basis to exclude her from program participation.  The duration of the exclusion is the minimum required by section 1128(c)(3)(E) of the Act; accordingly, it is reasonable as a matter of law.
Page 2
I.  Background
In a letter dated August 31, 2017, the I.G. advised Petitioner that she was excluded from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs because her license to provide health care as a registered nurse in the State of Florida was revoked, suspended, or otherwise lost for reasons bearing on her professional competence, professional performance, or financial integrity.  I.G. Exhibit (Ex.) 1.  The letter explained that section 1128(b)(4) of the Act authorizes the exclusion.  *Id.*  Petitioner timely requested review.  I convened a telephone prehearing conference and issued an Order and Schedule for Filing Briefs and Documentary Evidence (Briefing Order).
Pursuant to the Briefing Order, the I.G. submitted a brief and six proposed exhibits (I.G. Br.; I.G. Exs. 1-6).  Petitioner submitted answers to the questions posed in the informal short form brief which this office provided to her (P. Br.).  She did not offer any exhibits, nor did she object to any of the exhibits proposed by the I.G.  Therefore, in the absence of objection, I admit into evidence I.G. Exs. 1-6.
The parties agree that this case may be resolved without an in-person hearing.  I.G. Br. at 6; P. Br. at 3.  I therefore decide this case based on the written record.  *See*Briefing Order ¶ 9
II.  Discussion
***A. The I.G. is authorized to exclude Petitioner because the Florida State Board revoked Petitioner’s R.N. license for reasons bearing on her professional competence or professional performance.1***
The Act authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) to exclude from program participation an individual whose license to provide health care is revoked, suspended, or otherwise lost for reasons bearing on her professional competence, professional performance, or financial integrity.  Act § 1128(b)(4).  The Secretary has delegated this exclusion authority to the I.G.  42 C.F.R. § 1001.501(a).
Petitioner does not dispute that her R.N. license was revoked.  P. Br. at 1.  Nor does she directly challenge the conclusion that the State Board revoked her license for reasons bearing on her professional competence or professional performance, within the meaning of section 1128(b)(4) of the Act.  P. Br.  There can be no doubt that these elements are satisfied in the present case.
Page 3
The State Board’s Final Order revoking Petitioner’s license adopted the facts alleged in the Administrative Complaint in Petitioner’s case.  I.G. Ex. 5 at 1.  The Administrative Complaint recounts that Petitioner was employed as an R.N. at a long-term care facility, when a resident of the facility collapsed and Petitioner found the resident unresponsive, but still breathing.  I.G. Ex. 5 at 5.  Thereafter, according to the Administrative Complaint, Petitioner failed to assess the resident properly, failed to stay with the resident or ensure that he was adequately supervised, and failed to apply the facility’s Automated External Defibrillator, or otherwise attempt or apply resuscitation techniques, even though the resident did not have a “Do Not Resuscitate” order.  I.G. Ex. 5 at 5-6.  When emergency medical services arrived at the facility, they found the resident in cardiac arrest, and he was subsequently pronounced dead at the hospital.  I.G. Ex. 5 at 6.
Based on Petitioner’s conduct, the Administrative Complaint charged that Petitioner’s R.N. license was subject to disciplinary action because she “failed to meet minimal standards of acceptable and prevailing nursing practice” in violation of Fla. Stat. § 464.018(1)(n).  I.G. Ex. 5 at 6‐7.  The State Board’s Final Order revoked Petitioner’s license based on its conclusion that the conduct described above violated Fla. Stat. § 464.018(1)(n).  I.G. Ex. 5 at 2.  A license revocation based on an individual’s failure to meet minimal acceptable standards of nursing practice is, on its face, related to the individual’s professional competence and professional performance.  Accordingly, the I.G. had a basis to exclude Petitioner pursuant to section 1128(b)(4) of the Act.
In her informal brief, Petitioner argues, essentially, that the incident on which the State Board relied to revoke her license did not occur as the Board alleged.  She represents that she did assess the resident and did not leave him unattended, but “made sure the CNA [certified nursing assistant] stayed with the Resident to continue monitoring the person while [Petitioner] called emergency services (911) and [Petitioner] was speaking distance away from [the CNA].”  P. Br. at 2-3.  Even if I were inclined to credit Petitioner’s version of events,2
 I have no authority to look behind the State Board’s conclusion that Petitioner failed to adhere to minimum standards of acceptable nursing practice in her treatment of the resident at issue.  To do so would represent an impermissible collateral attack on the State Board’s decision to revoke Petitioner’s license.  *See* 42 C.F.R. § 1001.2007(d) (providing that, where an exclusion is based on an agency’s prior determination where the facts were adjudicated and a final decision was made, the underlying basis for that determination is not reviewable and may not be collaterally attacked).
Page 4
***B. As a matter of law, Petitioner must be excluded until she regains her R.N. license in Florida.*******
Petitioner does not explicitly argue that I should reduce the period of her exclusion, but such an argument may be implicit in her statement that “[n]ursing has been [her] livelihood for over 30 years” and she has “a lot to still offer the community.”  P. Br. at 4.  These arguments are essentially equitable.  However, equitable considerations are not a basis to overturn or shorten Petitioner’s exclusion.  I may not “review the I.G.’s decision to impose an exclusion .  .  . on the ground that the excluded person is a good person or well-thought of in the profession or suffering from the loss of his/her vocation.”  *Donna Rogers*, DAB No. 2381 at 6 (2011); *see also Stefan Murza, D.C.*, DAB No. 2848 at 4 (2018).
Rather, the Act requires that Petitioner’s period of exclusion “shall not be less than the period during which the individual’s . . . license. . . is revoked, suspended, or surrendered .  .  .  .”  Act § 1128(c)(3)(E); *see also*42 C.F.R. § 1001.501(b).  I note that, effective February 13, 2017, 42 C.F.R. § 1001.501 was amended by adding a new subsection (c).  *See*82 Fed. Reg. 4100, 4113-14 (Jan. 12, 2017).  Subsection 1001.501(c) authorizes the I.G. to consider early reinstatement of an individual if, after being fully informed of the circumstances leading to the exclusion, a state licensing authority (other than the one that originally suspended or revoked the individual’s license) grants the individual a new health care license or takes no adverse action against an existing health care license.  *Id.*at 4113.  In the present case, Petitioner has not presented any facts from which I could conclude that a state other than Florida issued her a nursing license or took no action on an existing license.  And, even if the record included such facts, I have no authority to direct that Petitioner be granted early reinstatement in any event.  The regulations delegate to the I.G. the discretion to grant or deny early reinstatement.  *See*42 C.F.R. §§ 1001.3002(f); 1001.3004(c).
III.  Conclusion
For the above reasons, I conclude that the I.G. had a legal basis to exclude Petitioner from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and all other federal health care programs for so long as her R.N. license is revoked in the State of Florida.


          /s/
        Leslie A. Weyn

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. My findings of fact and conclusions of law are set out in bold italic type. back to note 1
                      2. I note that Petitioner did not submit her statement of the facts as an affidavit or declaration under penalty of perjury, even though my Briefing Order directed parties to do so. Briefing Order ¶ 7(c)(ii). Nevertheless, even had she offered sworn testimony, this would not alter my conclusion that such testimony would represent an impermissible collateral attack on Petitioner’s license revocation. back to note 2 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back