Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Notices 30199 

(UFSAR). The proposed changes do not affect 

the probability of inadvertent operation or 

failure. Therefore, the probabilities of the 

accidents previously evaluated in the UFSAR 

are not affected. 

The proposed changes do not affect the 

ability of the PRHR HX and IRWST to 

perform their design functions. The designs 

of the PRHR HX and IRWST continue to meet 

the same regulatory acceptance criteria, 

codes, and standards as required by the 

UFSAR. In addition, the proposed changes 

maintain the capabilities of the PRHR HX 

and IRWST to mitigate the consequences of 

an accident and to meet the applicable 

regulatory acceptance criteria. 

The proposed changes do not affect the 

prevention and mitigation of other abnormal 

events (e.g., anticipated operational 

occurrences, earthquakes, floods and turbine 

missiles), or their safety or design analyses. 

Therefore, the consequences of the accidents 

evaluated in the UFSAR are not affected. 

Therefore, the proposed amendment does 

not involve a significant increase in the 

probability or consequences of an accident 

previously evaluated. 

2. Does the proposed amendment create 

the possibility of a new or different kind of 

accident from any accident previously 

evaluated? 

Response: No. 

The proposed changes do not affect the 

operation of any systems or equipment that 

may initiate a new or different kind of 

accident, or alter any SSC such that a new 

accident initiator or initiating sequence of 

events is created. 

The proposed changes do not affect any 

other SSC design functions or methods of 

operation in a manner that results in a new 

failure mode, malfunction, or sequence of 

events that affect safety-related or nonsafety 

related equipment. Therefore, this activity 

does not allow for a new fission product 

release path, result in a new fission product 

barrier failure mode, or create a new 

sequence of events that result in significant 

fuel cladding failures. 

Therefore, the requested amendment does 

not create the possibility of a new or different 

type of accident from any accident 

previously evaluated. 

3. Does the proposed amendment involve 

a significant reduction in a margin of safety? 

Response: No. 

The proposed changes maintain existing 

safety margins. The proposed changes verify 

and maintain the capabilities of the PRHR 

HX and IRWST to perform their design 

functions. Therefore, the proposed changes 

satisfy the same design functions in 

accordance with the same codes and 

standards as stated in the UFSAR. These 

changes do not affect any design code, 

function, design analysis, safety analysis 

input or result, or design/safety margin. 

No safety analysis or design basis 

acceptance limit/criterion is challenged or 

exceeded by the proposed changes, and no 

margin of safety is reduced. 

Therefore, the requested amendment does 

not involve a significant reduction in a 

margin of safety. 

The NRC staff has reviewed the 

licensee’s analysis and, based on this 

review, it appears that the three 

standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are 

satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff 

proposes to determine that the 

amendment request involves no 

significant hazards consideration. 

Attorney for licensee: M. Stanford 

Blanton, Balch & Bingham LLP, 1710 

Sixth Avenue North, Birmingham, AL 

35203–2015. 

NRC Branch Chief: Jennifer L. DixonHerrity. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day 

of June, 2018. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Jennifer L. Dixon-Herrity, 

Chief, Licensing Branch 4, Division of New 

Reactor Licensing, Office of New Reactors. 

[FR Doc. 2018–13736 Filed 6–26–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. 052–00025 and 052–00026; 

NRC–2008–0252] 

Southern Nuclear Operating Company, 

Inc.; Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, 

Units 3 and 4; Changes to 

Construction Fitness-for-Duty 

Commitments 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: License amendment application; 

opportunity to comment, request a 

hearing, and petition for leave to 

intervene. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is considering 

issuance of an amendment to Combined 

Licenses (NPF–91 and NPF–92), issued 

to Southern Nuclear Operating 

Company, Inc. (SNC), and Georgia 

Power Company, Oglethorpe Power 

Corporation, MEAG Power SPVM, LLC, 

MEAG Power SPVJ, LLC, MEAG Power 

SPVP, LLC, Authority of Georgia, and 

the City of Dalton, Georgia (together 

‘‘the licensees’’), for construction and 

operation of the Vogtle Electric 

Generating Plant (VEGP), Units 3 and 4, 

located in Burke County, Georgia. 

DATES: Submit must be filed by July 27, 

2018. Requests for a hearing or petition 

for leave to intervene must be filed by 

August 27, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2008–0252. Address 

questions about NRC dockets to Jennifer 

Borges; telephone: 301–287–9127; 

email: Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For 

technical questions, contact the 

individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

document. 

• Mail comments to: May Ma, Office 

of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7– 

A60, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 

0001. 

For additional direction on obtaining 

information and submitting comments, 

see ‘‘Obtaining Information and 

Submitting Comments’’ in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

B. Kallan, Office of New Reactors, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–000; telephone: 

301–415–2809; email: Paul.Kallan@

nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Obtaining Information and 

Submitting Comments 

A. Obtaining Information 

Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2008– 

0252 when contacting the NRC about 

the availability of information for this 

action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this 

action by any of the following methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2008–0252. 

• NRC’s Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the 

ADAMS Public Documents collection at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ 

adams.html. To begin the search, select 

‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then 

select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS 

Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, 

please contact the NRC’s Public 

Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 

1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by 

email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The 

application for amendment, dated June 

15, 2018, is available in ADAMS under 

Accession No. ML18166A347. 

• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and 

purchase copies of public documents at 

the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. 

B. Submitting Comments 

Please include Docket ID NRC–2008– 

0252 in your comment submission. 

The NRC cautions you not to include 

identifying or contact information that 

you do not want to be publicly 

disclosed in your comment submission. 

The NRC posts all comment 

submissions at http://

www.regulations.gov as well as entering 

the comment submissions into ADAMS. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
30200 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Notices 

The NRC does not routinely edit 

comment submissions to remove 

identifying or contact information. 

If you are requesting or aggregating 

comments from other persons for 

submission to the NRC, then you should 

inform those persons not to include 

identifying or contact information that 

they do not want to be publicly 

disclosed in their comment submission. 

Your request should state that the NRC 

does not routinely edit comment 

submissions to remove such information 

before making the comment 

submissions available to the public or 

entering the comment submissions into 

ADAMS. 

II. Introduction 

The NRC is considering issuance of an 

amendment to Combined License Nos. 

NPF–91 and NPF–92, issued to SNC and 

Georgia Power Company for operation 

of the VEGP, Units 3 and 4, located in 

Burke County, Georgia. 

The proposed changes would revise 

commitments related to the construction 

fitness-for-duty (FFD) program 

described in the VEGP, Units 3 and 4 

Updated Final Safety Analysis Report 

(UFSAR). Specifically, the change 

would involve the creation of a new 

type of FFD Authorization that would 

allow construction workers temporary 

access to the construction site pending 

completion of all pre-access FFD 

requirements. The individual will not 

be given assignments to work on safety 

or security-related structures, systems, 

and components prior to the completion 

of the FFD requirements. 

Before any issuance of the proposed 

license amendment, the NRC will need 

to make the findings required by the 

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended 

(the Act), and NRC’s regulations. 

The NRC has made a proposed 

determination that the license 

amendment request involves no 

significant hazards consideration. Under 

the NRC’s regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, 

this means that operation of the facility 

in accordance with the proposed 

amendment would not (1) involve a 

significant increase in the probability or 

consequences of an accident previously 

evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of 

a new or different kind of accident from 

any accident previously evaluated; or 

(3) involve a significant reduction in a 

margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR 

50.91(a), the licensee has provided its 

analysis of the issue of no significant 

hazards consideration, which is 

presented below: 

1. Does the proposed amendment involve 

a significant increase in the probability or 

consequences of an accident previously 

evaluated? 

Response: No. 

The proposed changes to the Vogtle 

Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) 3 and 4 

Updated Final Safety Analysis Report 

(UFSAR) commitment related to the 

construction worker Fitness-for-Duty (FFD) 

program do not affect the design of a system, 

structure, or component (SSC) used to meet 

the design bases of the nuclear plant. Nor do 

the changes affect the construction or 

operation of the nuclear plant itself, so there 

is no change to the probability or 

consequences of an accident previously 

evaluated. Changing the VEGP 3 and 4 FFD 

program commitments do not affect 

prevention and mitigation of abnormal events 

(e.g., accidents, anticipated operational 

occurrences, earthquakes, floods, or turbine 

missiles) or their safety or design analyses. 

No safety-related SSC or function is 

adversely affected. The changes neither 

involve nor interface with any SSC accident 

initiator or initiating sequence of events, so 

the probabilities of the accidents evaluated in 

the UFSAR are not affected. Because the 

changes do not involve any safety-related 

SSC or function used to mitigate an accident, 

the consequences of the accidents evaluated 

in the UFSAR are not affected. 

Therefore, the proposed amendment does 

not involve a significant increase in the 

probability or consequences of an accident 

previously evaluated. 

2. Does the proposed amendment create 

the possibility of a new or different kind of 

accident from any accident previously 

evaluated? 

The proposed changes to the VEGP 3 and 

4 UFSAR commitment related to the 

construction worker FFD program do not 

affect the operation of any systems or 

equipment that may initiate a new or 

different kind of accident or alter any SSC 

such that a new accident initiator or 

initiating sequence of events is created. The 

changes do not affect the design of an SSC 

used to meet the design bases of the nuclear 

plant. Nor do the changes affect the 

construction or operation of the nuclear 

plant. Consequently, there is no new or 

different kind of accident from any accident 

previously evaluated. The changes do not 

affect safety-related equipment, nor do they 

affect equipment that, if it failed, could 

initiate an accident or a failure of a fission 

product barrier. In addition, the changes do 

not result in a new failure mode, 

malfunction, or sequence of events that could 

affect safety or safety-related equipment. 

No analysis is adversely affected. No 

system or design function or equipment 

qualification is adversely affected by the 

changes. This activity will not allow for a 

new fission product release path, nor will it 

result in a new fission product barrier failure 

mode, nor create a new sequence of events 

that would result in significant fuel cladding 

failures. 

Therefore, the proposed amendment does 

not create the possibility of a new or different 

kind of accident from any accident 

previously evaluated. 

3. Does the proposed amendment involve 

a significant reduction in a margin of safety? 

Response: No. 

The proposed changes to the VEGP 3 and 

4 UFSAR commitment related to the 

construction worker FFD program do not 

alter any safety-related equipment, applicable 

design codes, code compliance, design 

function, or safety analysis. Consequently, no 

safety analysis or design basis acceptance 

limit/criterion is challenged or exceeded by 

the proposed changes, thus the margin of 

safety is not reduced. 

Therefore, the proposed amendment does 

not involve a significant reduction in a 

margin of safety. 

The NRC staff has reviewed the 

licensee’s analysis and, based on this 

review, it appears that the three 

standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are 

satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff 

proposes to determine that the license 

amendment request involves no 

significant hazards consideration. 

The NRC is seeking public comments 

on this proposed determination that the 

license amendment request involves no 

significant hazards consideration. Any 

comments received within 30 days after 

the date of publication of this notice 

will be considered in making any final 

determination. 

Normally, the Commission will not 

issue the amendment until the 

expiration of 60 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. The 

Commission may issue the license 

amendment before expiration of the 60- 

day notice period if the Commission 

concludes the amendment involves no 

significant hazards consideration. In 

addition, the Commission may issue the 

amendment prior to the expiration of 

the 30-day comment period should 

circumstances change during the 30-day 

comment period such that failure to act 

in a timely way would result, for 

example, in derating or shutdown of the 

facility. Should the Commission take 

action prior to the expiration of either 

the comment period or the notice 

period, the Commission will publish a 

notice of issuance in the Federal 

Register. Should the Commission make 

a final no significant hazards 

consideration determination, any 

hearing will take place after issuance. 

The Commission expects that the need 

to take this action will occur very 

infrequently. 

III. Opportunity To Request a Hearing 

and Petition for Leave To Intervene 

Within 60 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, any persons 

(petitioner) whose interest may be 

affected by this action may file a request 

for a hearing and a petition to intervene 

(petition) with respect to the action. 

Petitions shall be filed in accordance 

with the Commission’s ‘‘Agency Rules 

of Practice and Procedure’’ in 10 CFR 

part 2. Interested persons should 

consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.309, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Notices 30201 

which is available at the NRC’s PDR, 

located at One White Flint North, Room 

O1–F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first 

floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852. The 

NRC’s regulations are accessible 

electronically from the NRC Library on 

the NRC’s website at http://

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/cfr/. If a petition is filed 

within 60 days, the Commission or a 

presiding officer designated by the 

Commission or by the Chief 

Administrative Judge of the Atomic 

Safety and Licensing Board Panel, will 

rule on the petition; and the Secretary 

or the Chief Administrative Judge of the 

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 

Panel will issue a notice of a hearing or 

an appropriate order. 

As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a 

petition shall set forth with particularity 

the interest of the petitioner in the 

proceeding, and how that interest may 

be affected by the results of the 

proceeding. The petition should 

specifically explain the reasons why 

intervention should be permitted with 

particular reference to the following 

general requirements: (1) The name, 

address, and telephone number of the 

petitioner; (2) the nature of the 

petitioner’s right under the Act to be 

made a party to the proceeding; (3) the 

nature and extent of the petitioner’s 

property, financial, or other interest in 

the proceeding; and (4) the possible 

effect of any decision or order which 

may be entered in the proceeding on the 

petitioner’s interest. The petition must 

also set forth the specific contentions 

which the petitioner seeks to have 

litigated at the proceeding. 

Each contention must consist of a 

specific statement of the issue of law or 

fact to be raised or controverted. In 

addition, the petitioner shall provide a 

brief explanation of the bases for the 

contention and a concise statement of 

the alleged facts or expert opinion 

which support the contention and on 

which the petitioner intends to rely in 

proving the contention at the hearing. 

The petitioner must also provide 

references to those specific sources and 

documents of which the petitioner is 

aware and on which the petitioner 

intends to rely to establish those facts or 

expert opinion to support its position on 

the issue. The petition must include 

sufficient information to show that a 

genuine dispute exists with the 

applicant on a material issue of law or 

fact. Contentions shall be limited to 

matters within the scope of the 

proceeding. The contention must be one 

which, if proven, would entitle the 

petitioner to relief. A petitioner who 

fails to satisfy these requirements with 

respect to at least one contention will 

not be permitted to participate as a 

party. 

Those permitted to intervene become 

parties to the proceeding, subject to any 

limitations in the order granting leave to 

intervene, and have the opportunity to 

participate fully in the conduct of the 

hearing with respect to resolution of 

that person’s admitted contentions 

consistent with the NRC’s regulations, 

policies, and procedures. 

Petitions for leave to intervene must 

be filed no later than 60 days from the 

date of publication of this notice. 

Requests for hearing, petitions for leave 

to intervene, and motions for leave to 

file new or amended contentions that 

are filed after the 60-day deadline will 

not be entertained absent a 

determination by the presiding officer 

that the filing demonstrates good cause 

by satisfying the three factors in 10 CFR 

2.309(c)(1)(i) through (iii). 

If a hearing is requested, and the 

Commission has not made a final 

determination on the issue of no 

significant hazards consideration, the 

Commission will make a final 

determination on the issue of no 

significant hazards consideration. The 

final determination will serve to decide 

when the hearing is held. If the final 

determination is that the amendment 

request involves no significant hazards 

consideration, the Commission may 

issue the amendment and make it 

immediately effective, notwithstanding 

the request for a hearing. Any hearing 

held would take place after issuance of 

the amendment. If the final 

determination is that the amendment 

request involves a significant hazards 

consideration, then any hearing held 

would take place before the issuance of 

any amendment unless the Commission 

finds an imminent danger to the health 

or safety of the public, in which case it 

will issue an appropriate order or rule 

under 10 CFR part 2. 

A State, local governmental body, 

Federally-recognized Indian Tribe, or 

agency thereof, may submit a petition to 

the Commission to participate as a party 

under 10 CFR 2.309(h)(1). 

The petition should state the nature 

and extent of the petitioner’s interest in 

the proceeding. The petition should be 

submitted to the Commission by August 

27, 2018. The petition must be filed in 

accordance with the filing instructions 

in the ‘‘Electronic Submissions (EFiling)’’ section of this document, and 

should meet the requirements for 

petitions set forth in this section, except 

that under 10 CFR 2.309(h)(2) a State, 

local governmental body, or Federallyrecognized Indian Tribe, or agency 

thereof does not need to address the 

standing requirements in 10 CFR 

2.309(d) if the facility is located within 

its boundaries. A State, local 

governmental body, Federallyrecognized Indian Tribe, or agency 

thereof may also have the opportunity to 

participate under 10 CFR 2.315(c). 

If a hearing is granted, any person 

who does not wish, or is not qualified, 

to become a party to the proceeding 

may, in the discretion of the presiding 

officer, be permitted to make a limited 

appearance pursuant to the provisions 

of 10 CFR 2.315(a). A person making a 

limited appearance may make an oral or 

written statement of position on the 

issues, but may not otherwise 

participate in the proceeding. A limited 

appearance may be made at any session 

of the hearing or at any prehearing 

conference, subject to the limits and 

conditions as may be imposed by the 

presiding officer. Details regarding the 

opportunity to make a limited 

appearance will be provided by the 

presiding officer if such sessions are 

scheduled. 

IV. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing) 

All documents filed in NRC 

adjudicatory proceedings, including a 

request for hearing, a petition for leave 

to intervene, any motion or other 

document filed in the proceeding prior 

to the submission of a request for 

hearing or petition to intervene 

(hereinafter ‘‘petition’’), and documents 

filed by interested governmental entities 

participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c), 

must be filed in accordance with the 

NRC’s E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139; 

August 28, 2007, as amended at 77 FR 

46562, August 3, 2012). The E-Filing 

process requires participants to submit 

and serve all adjudicatory documents 

over the internet, or in some cases to 

mail copies on electronic storage media. 

Participants may not submit paper 

copies of their filings unless they seek 

an exemption in accordance with the 

procedures described below. 

To comply with the procedural 

requirements of E-Filing, at least 10 

days prior to the filing deadline, the 

participant should contact the Office of 

the Secretary by email at 

hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone 

at 301–415–1677, to request (1) a digital 

identification (ID) certificate, which 

allows the participant (or its counsel or 

representative) to digitally sign 

documents and access the E-Submittal 

server for any proceeding in which it is 

participating; and (2) advise the 

Secretary that the participant will be 

submitting a petition (even in instances 

in which the participant, or its counsel 

or representative, already holds an NRCissued digital ID certificate). Based upon 

this information, the Secretary will 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
30202 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Notices 

establish an electronic docket for the 

hearing in this proceeding if the 

Secretary has not already established an 

electronic docket. 

Information about applying for a 

digital ID certificate is available on the 

NRC’s public website at http://

www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/ 

getting-started.html. System 

requirements for accessing the ESubmittal server are available on the 

NRC’s public website at http://

www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/ 

adjudicatory-sub.html. Participants may 

attempt to use other software not listed 

on the website, but should note that the 

NRC’s E-Filing system does not support 

unlisted software, and the NRC 

Electronic Filing Help Desk will not be 

able to offer assistance in using unlisted 

software. 

Once a participant has obtained a 

digital ID certificate and a docket has 

been created, the participant can then 

submit a petition. Submissions should 

be in Portable Document Format (PDF). 

Additional guidance on PDF 

submissions is available on the NRC’s 

public website at http://www.nrc.gov/ 

site-help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html. A 

filing is considered complete at the time 

the documents are submitted through 

the NRC’s E-Filing system. To be timely, 

an electronic filing must be submitted to 

the E-Filing system no later than 11:59 

p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. 

Upon receipt of a transmission, the EFiling system time-stamps the document 

and sends the submitter an email notice 

confirming receipt of the document. The 

E-Filing system also distributes an email 

notice that provides access to the 

document to the NRC’s Office of the 

General Counsel and any others who 

have advised the Office of the Secretary 

that they wish to participate in the 

proceeding, so that the filer need not 

serve the documents on those 

participants separately. Therefore, 

applicants and other participants (or 

their counsel or representative) must 

apply for and receive a digital ID 

certificate before a hearing petition to 

intervene is filed so that they can obtain 

access to the document via the E-Filing 

system. 

A person filing electronically using 

the NRC’s adjudicatory E-Filing system 

may seek assistance by contacting the 

NRC Electronic Filing Help Desk 

through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link located 

on the NRC’s public website at http://

www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by email to 

MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at 1–866–672–7640. The NRC 

Electronic Filing Help Desk is available 

between 9 a.m. and 7 p.m., Eastern 

Time, Monday through Friday, 

excluding government holidays. 

Participants who believe that they 

have a good cause for not submitting 

documents electronically must file an 

exemption request, in accordance with 

10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper 

filing stating why there is good cause for 

not filing electronically and requesting 

authorization to continue to submit 

documents in paper format. Such filings 

must be submitted by: (1) First class 

mail addressed to the Office of the 

Secretary of the Commission, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention: 

Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or 

(2) courier, express mail, or expedited 

delivery service to the Office of the 

Secretary, 11555 Rockville Pike, 

Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention: 

Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. 

Participants filing a document in this 

manner are responsible for serving the 

document on all other participants. 

Filing is considered complete by firstclass mail as of the time of deposit in 

the mail, or by courier, express mail, or 

expedited delivery service upon 

depositing the document with the 

provider of the service. A presiding 

officer, having granted an exemption 

request from using E-Filing, may require 

a participant or party to use E-Filing if 

the presiding officer subsequently 

determines that the reason for granting 

the exemption from use of E-Filing no 

longer exists. 

Documents submitted in adjudicatory 

proceedings will appear in the NRC’s 

electronic hearing docket which is 

available to the public at http://

ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded 

pursuant to an order of the Commission, 

or the presiding officer. Participants are 

requested not to include personal 

privacy information, such as social 

security numbers, home addresses, or 

home phone numbers in their filings, 

unless an NRC regulation or other law 

requires submission of such 

information. However, in some 

instances, a request to intervene will 

require including information on local 

residence in order to demonstrate a 

proximity assertion of interest in the 

proceeding. With respect to copyrighted 

works, except for limited excerpts that 

serve the purpose of the adjudicatory 

filings and would constitute a Fair Use 

application, participants are requested 

not to include copyrighted materials in 

their submission. 

For further details with respect to this 

action, see the application for license 

amendment dated June 15, 2018. 

Attorney for licensee: Mr. M. Stanford 

Blanton, Balch & Bingham LLP, 1710 

Sixth Avenue North, Birmingham, AL 

35203–2015. 

NRC Branch Chief: Jennifer DixonHerrity. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day 

of June, 2018. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Jennifer L. Dixon-Herrity, 

Chief, Licensing Branch 4, Division of 

Licensing, Siting, and Environmental 

Analysis, Office of New Reactors. 

[FR Doc. 2018–13757 Filed 6–26–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. MC2018–184 and CP2018–258; 

MC2018–185 and CP2018–259] 

New Postal Products 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recent Postal Service filing for the 

Commission’s consideration concerning 

negotiated service agreements. This 

notice informs the public of the filing, 

invites public comment, and takes other 

administrative steps. 

DATES: Comments are due: June 29, 

2018. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http://

www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit 

comments electronically should contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section by 

telephone for advice on filing 

alternatives. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 

202–789–6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Docketed Proceeding(s) 

I. Introduction 

The Commission gives notice that the 

Postal Service has filed request(s) for the 

Commission to consider matters related 

to negotiated service agreement(s). The 

requests(s) may propose the addition or 

removal of a negotiated service 

agreement from the market dominant or 

the competitive product list, or the 

modification of an existing product 

currently appearing on the market 

dominant or the competitive product 

list. 

Section II identifies the docket 

number(s) associated with each Postal 

Service request, the title of each Postal 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES