Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2019
                              Jacqueline Leventhal, DAB CR5342 (2019)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Jacqueline Leventhal, DAB CR5342 (2019)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Jacqueline Leventhal,
	(PTAN: V113534),
	(NPI: 1245494731),
	Petitioner,
v.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Docket No. C-17-11Decision No. CR5342June 7, 2019

        
              
    

      DECISION
Petitioner, Jacqueline Leventhal, was a Nevada doctor of osteopathy who participated in the Medicare program until August 4, 2016, when the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) revoked her enrollment, citing 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(12).  CMS took this action because the Nevada Medicaid Agency terminated her Medicaid enrollment, effective July 22, 2014, and she had exhausted her appeal rights.
Petitioner now appeals the revocation.
I find that, pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(12), CMS appropriately revoked Petitioner Leventhal’s Medicare enrollment because the Nevada Medicaid Agency terminated her Medicaid participation, and the state’s action was final.  I therefore affirm CMS’s determination.
Background
In a revocation notice, dated July 5, 2016, the Medicare contractor, Noridian Healthcare Solutions, revoked Petitioner Leventhal’s Medicare enrollment, effective August 4, 2016.
Page 2
As the notice letter explains, the contractor acted pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(12) because the Nevada Medicaid Agency had terminated Petitioner’s Medicaid participation, and her appeal rights had been exhausted.  CMS Ex. 3.
Petitioner requested further review.  CMS Ex. 4.  In a reconsidered determination, dated August 5, 2016, the contractor affirmed the revocation, noting that Petitioner offered no evidence to show that her Medicaid enrollment “is in process/pending.”  CMS Ex. 1.
Petitioner appealed.  CMS has filed a motion for summary judgment (CMS Br.), and Petitioner filed a brief (P. Br.).
**Exhibits**.  With its motion, CMS submits four exhibits (CMS Exs. 1-4).  With her brief, Petitioner submits three exhibits (P. Exs. 1-3).  In the absence of any objections, I admit into evidence CMS Exs. 1-4.
CMS objects to my admitting P. Exs. 1 and 2, arguing that Petitioner did not specifically identify the documents as “new,” which my pre-hearing order directs her to do.  My pre‐hearing order reflects the regulations governing these proceedings, which mandate that I exclude “new” documentary evidence, i.e., evidence not presented at the reconsideration, unless I find good cause for Petitioner submitting the evidence for the first time at the ALJ level.  42 C.F.R. § 498.56(e).  The documents in question are obviously new.  P. Ex. 1, titled “Notice of Revalidation in Nevada Medicaid,” is dated November 17, 2016, more than three months after the contractor issued its reconsidered determination.  Petitioner could not have submitted it at the reconsideration level because it did not then exist.  Similarly, P. Ex. 2 is a list of “Nevada Exclusions/Sanction.”  According to Petitioner, the document is dated December 12, 2016.  Petitioner’s Exhibit List at 2.  I see no evidence of that date; however, because the document includes “effective dates” of termination through late December 2016, I am satisfied that it was generated after the contractor issued its reconsidered determination.
Although Petitioner did not specifically label these documents as “new evidence,” I am not going to penalize Petitioner, who is pro se, for failing to state the obvious.
I therefore admit P. Exs. 1-3.
**Summary Judgment**.  Although CMS has moved for summary judgment, I find that this matter may be decided on the written record, without considering whether the standards for summary judgment are satisfied.  In my pre-hearing order, I instructed each party to submit the written direct testimony of any proposed witnesses and, if it wished to cross-examine an opposing witness, to state so affirmatively.  Acknowledgment and Pre-hearing Order at 5 (¶¶ 8, 9) (October 7, 2016).  CMS has no witnesses.  Petitioner mentions one witness but has not submitted her written declaration, so that witness will not be allowed to testify.  Acknowledgment at 6 (¶ 12).  An in-person hearing would
Page 3
therefore serve no purpose, and I may decide this case based on the written record.  *See* Acknowledgment at 5 (¶ 10).
Discussion
***Pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(12), CMS properly revoked Petitioner Leventhal’s Medicare enrollment because the Nevada State Medicaid Agency terminated her Medicaid billing privileges, and the state agency’s action is final***.1
**Statute and regulations**.  CMS regulates the Medicare enrollment of providers and suppliers.  Social Security Act (Act) § 1866(j)(1)(A).  It may revoke a supplier’s enrollment in the Medicare program if a state Medicaid agency has terminated her Medicaid billing privileges, and she has exhausted all applicable state appeal rights.  42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(12).  So long as I find that these two criteria are met, I must sustain the revocation.  *Douglas Bradley, M.D.*, DAB No. 2663 at 6-7, 16 (2015), *citing Letantia Bussell, M.D.*, DAB No. 2196 at 13 (2008).
**Termination of Petitioner’s Medicaid billing privileges**.  In a letter dated July 22, 2014, the Nevada Medicaid Agency (Nevada Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Health Care Financing and Policy) advised Petitioner that, effective immediately, it was terminating its contractual relationship with her.  CMS Ex. 2.  The Medicaid Agency took this action because Petitioner’s professional license had been suspended, effective June 13, 2014.  CMS Ex. 2.
Petitioner does not claim that she appealed the state’s action.
CMS thus had the authority to revoke Petitioner’s Medicare enrollment.
Petitioner submits evidence that she subsequently reapplied to the state agency and that her Medicaid billing privileges have been reinstated.  Hearing Request Attachment (document 1c); P. Exs. 1, 2; *see* CMS Ex. 4.  Assuming the impediment to her re-enrollment has been removed, Petitioner may reapply for enrollment after her re-enrollment bar ends (which it has).  42 C.F.R. § 424.535(c).  But this does not invalidate the revocation.
Petitioner also claims that the State Medicaid Agency made a mistake and her witness, a representative from that agency, “might testify” that she was placed on the Medicaid exclusion list “inappropriately.”  P. Br. at 2.  Petitioner had an opportunity to challenge her Medicaid exclusion through the state’s review process, and she opted not to take that opportunity.  Termination of her Medicaid participation was therefore final.  To be
Page 4
reinstated, she had to reapply, which she did.  And, in her September 29, 2016 Medicaid application, she discloses that her medical license was suspended from June 12, 2014, through April 15, 2015.  Hearing Request Attachment (document 1c at 5).  She also submits a September 28, 2015 letter from the Nevada Board of Osteopathic Medicine, confirming that her license was suspended, that she successfully participated in what appears to be a substance abuse rehab program, and that she was cleared to practice medicine (with conditions), effective April 15, 2015.  Hearing Request Attachment (document 1c at 18).  These documents confirm that Petitioner lost her medical license and was subsequently terminated from participating in the state Medicaid program.
Conclusion
I affirm CMS’s determination.  I find that CMS was authorized to revoke Petitioner Leventhal’s Medicare enrollment because the Nevada Medicaid Agency terminated her participation in the state program, and she did not appeal.  CMS was therefore authorized to revoke her Medicare enrollment pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 424.535(a)(12).


          /s/
        Carolyn Cozad Hughes

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. I make this one finding of fact/conclusion of law to support my decision. back to note 1 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back