alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021019EN.01006301.xml

| 18.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/63

---

Action brought on 13 November 2020 — Dr. August Wolff v EUIPO — Combe International (Vagisan)

(Case T-679/20)

(2021/C 19/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel (Bielefeld, Germany) (represented by: A. Thünken, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Combe International Ltd (New York, New York, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark Vagisan — International registration designating the European Union No 10 985 168

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 September 2020 in Case R 2459/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | annul the decision of the Cancellation Division of the EUIPO No 000018101 C of 11 September 2019, |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Cancellation Division of the EUIPO No 000018101 C of 11 September 2019,

| — | order the EUIPO and, as the case may be, the intervener to bear the costs of the proceedings and the costs incurred by proceedings before the EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EUIPO and, as the case may be, the intervener to bear the costs of the proceedings and the costs incurred by proceedings before the EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
No. 11279.

#### The Toledo Railways & Light Co. *v.*Wettstein, Admr.

Decided November 10, 1908.

Error to the Circuit Court of Lucas *440county.

*Messrs. Smith & Baker,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Orion W. Nelson,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, Crew, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



In connection with the Annual Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the Operating Partnership) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward J. Fritsch, President and Chief Executive Officer of Highwoods Properties Inc., general partner of the Operating Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    EDWARD J. FRITSCH                                    
|Edward J. Fritsch                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
|January 19, 2005
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT (2)SCHEDULE UNDER REVIEW PENDING RECEIPT OF INFORMATIONSTP AIA DC AMENDMENTSAFETY REVIEW COMPLETEDRULEMAKINGSCHEDULEDTOSHIBA DC RENEWALNOT SCHEDULEDRULEMAKINGNOT SCHEDULEDGE-HITACHI DC RENEWALNOT SCHEDULEDRULEMAKINGNOT SCHEDULED03/08/11ABWR DESIGN CENTER REVIEWABWR DESIGN CERTIFICATION RENEWAL20052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018New Reactor Licensing ApplicationsSchedules By Calendar Year1 OF 3Tue 03/08/11ISSUEDDC AMENDMENTSAFETY REVIEW COMPLETEDRULEMAKINGSCHEDULEDUTHERN - VOGTLE ESPISSUEDSOUTHERN - VOGTLE (GA) (2)SCHEDULEDSOUTH CAROLINA E&G - SUMMER (2)SCHEDULEDPROGRESS ENERGY - LEVY COUNTY (FL) (2)SCHEDULEDFLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT - TURKEY POINT (2)SCHEDULE UNDER REVIEWDUKE - LEE STATION (SC) (2)SCHEDULEDPROGRESS ENERGY - HARRIS (NC) (2)SCHEDULEDTVA - BELLEFONTE (AL) (2)REVIEW SUSPENDED 9/29/2010DESIGN CERTIFICATION - EPRSCHEDULEDRULEMAKINGSCHEDULEDUNISTAR - CALVERT CLIFFS (MD) (1)SCHEDULEDAMERENUE - CALLAWAY (1)REVIEW SUSPENDED 6/23/2009PPL GENERATION - BELL BEND (1)SCHEDULE UNDER REVIEW PENDING RECEIPT OF INFORMATIONUNISTAR - NINE MILE PT (NY) (1)REVIEW SUSPENDED 12/01/2009ATION - ESBWRSAFETY REVIEW COMPLETEDRULEMAKINGSCHEDULEDISSUEDDOMINION - NORTH ANNA (VA) (1)APPLICANT CHANGED TECHNOLOGY 6/30/10ISSUEDENTERGY - GRAND GULF (MS) (1)REVIEW SUSPENDED 01/09/09ENTERGY - RIVER BEND (LA) (1)REVIEW SUSPENDED 01/09/09DTE - FERMI (MI) (1)SCHEDULEDDESIGN CERTIFICATION - USAPWRSCHEDULEDRULEMAKINGSCHEDULEDLUMINANT - COMANCHE PEAK (TX) (2)SCHEDULEDDOMINION - NORTH ANNA (VA) (1)SCHEDULED03/08/11AP1000 DESIGN CENTER REVIEWEPR DESIGN CENTER REVIEWESBWR DESIGN CENTER REVIEWUSAPWR DESIGN CENTER REVIEW20052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018New Reactor Licensing ApplicationsSchedules By Calendar Year2 OF 3Tue 03/08/11DESIGN CERTIFICATION - KEPCONOT SCHEDULEDRULEMAKINGNOT SCHISSUEDSOUTHERN - GREENFIELD SITENOT SCHEDULEDUNNAMED SCOLNOT SCHEDULEDPSEG ESPSCHEDULEDBLUE CASTLE PROJECT (UT) (1)NOT SCHEDULEDEXELON - VICTORIA CTY (TX) (2)SCHEDULEDCALLAWAY (MO) (1)NOT SCHEDULEDNuScale DCNOT SCHEDULEDRULEMAKINGNOT SCHEDULEDB&W mPower DCNOT SCHEDULEDRULEMAKINGNOT SCHEDULEDTVA Clinch River Construction Permit ApplicationNOT SCHEDULEDTVA Clinch River Operating License ApplicationNGNP Prototype COLNOT03/08/11UNANNOUNCED TECHNOLOGYKEPCO DESIGN CENTER REVIEWADVANCED REACTORS20052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018New Reactor Licensing ApplicationsSchedules By Calendar Year3 OF 3Tue 03/08/11
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 160 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 160

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
 States should seek a final and conclusive account of the whereabouts 
                and definitive fate of Raoul Wallenberg.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 1993

Mr. Engel submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
 States should seek a final and conclusive account of the whereabouts 
                and definitive fate of Raoul Wallenberg.

Whereas Raoul Wallenberg, a Swedish citizen and diplomat, was responsible for 
        saving the lives of 15,000 Hungarian Jews through the issuance of 
        Swedish passports and for helping an additional 100,000 Hungarian Jews 
        escape Nazi authorities during World War II;
Whereas on January 17, 1945, Raoul Wallenberg was taken into ``protective 
        custody'' by Soviet troops, in violation of all international standards 
        of diplomatic immunity;
Whereas Raoul Wallenberg was later arrested by Soviet troops on charges of 
        spying, and finally taken to Lubyanka Prison in Moscow, where he was 
        reported to have died on July 17, 1947, of a heart attack;
Whereas conflicting reports and information have surfaced over the last 45 years 
        claiming that Raoul Wallenberg was executed by Soviet authorities or in 
        fact is still alive in the former Soviet Union;
Whereas the Soviet Union has now ceased to exist and has been succeeded by the 
        Commonwealth of Independent States which has pursued democratic reform 
        while seeking to address Soviet atrocities of the past; and
Whereas the time has come to finally put an end to all speculation and confusion 
        as to the fate of Raoul Wallenberg: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) gratefully acknowledges the cooperation of the Soviet 
        and now Russian authorities in providing records and personal 
        effects of Raoul Wallenberg to his family;
            (2) requests that the President pursue, through diplomatic 
        discussions with the Government of the Russian Federation, an 
        investigation into the whereabouts and definitive fate of Raoul 
        Wallenberg; and
            (3) requests that the results of this investigation be made 
        public.

                                 <all>
```
Forwarded by Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/06/2010 08:58 PM

From: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US                                                             

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov                                                            

Cc:   "Michael Laney" <mnl@rti.org>                                                          

Date: 07/29/2010 03:19 PM                                                                    

Subject:   Emailing: New Facilities List.xlsx                                                

Updated list of new facilities.

Keith W. Barnett

USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

Mail Code D243‐02

Research Triangle Park, NC  27711

919‐541‐5605

barnett.keith@epa.gov

(See attached file: New Facilities List.xlsx)
Sumter Cement Company Center Hill FL Posponed Cancelled NA 

Name Location Current Start Date in PCA Data Estimated New Date Subject to New 

Cemex (South) Brooksville, FL 2008 No Cemex New Braunfels, TX 2008 No 

Continental Cement Hannibal, MO 2008 No 

Texas Industries Oro Grande, CA 2008 No American Cement Co. Sumterville, FL 2009 No Ash Grove Cement Foremen, AR 2009 No 

Buzzi Unicem Festus, MO 2009 No 

Eagle Materials Fernley, NV Posponed Unknown NA 

Essroc Cement Martinsburg, WV 2009 No 

GCC America Pueblo, CO 2009 No 

Holcim St. Genevieve, MO 2009 No Texas Industries New Braunfels, TX Posponed Cancelled No 

Drake Cement Paulden, Arizona 2010 2010 No 

Florida Rock Newberry, Florida 2010 2010 No Giant Cement/Keystone Bath, Pennsylvania 2010 2010 No 

Lafarge Harleyvile, SC 2010 2010 No 

Sumter Cement Company Center Hill, FL Posponed Cancelled NA Cal Portland Rilliot, CA Posponed 2013 Note 1 Yes 

Cemex Seligman, AZ 2012 2013 Yes Eagle Materials Laramie, WY Posponed Cancelled Note 2 NA 

Houston American Cement Perry, GA 2012 2013 Note 3 Yes Lehigh Mitchell, IN 2012 2013 Note 4 Yes Titan America Castle Hayne, NC 2012 2013 Note 5 Yes 

Lafarge Gain Chain, IL 2013 2013 Note 6 Yes National Cement Ragland, AL 2013 2013 Note 7 Yes 

NSPS Proposal Date ‐ June 16, 2808

NESHAP Proposal Date ‐ December 2, 2005 for Mercury, THC, and HCl

Note 1 ‐ based conversation with Cal Portland, Jay GradyNote 2‐ Based on conversation with Eagle MaterialsNote 3 ‐ based n newspaper article stating facility I on hold until 2012 and assuming 2 years to construct‐Jan 2012 until December 2013

Note 4‐ Conversation with Tim Matz ‐ Lehigh

Note 5 ‐ Based on assessment of where Titan is in permitting process

Note 6 ‐ based on conversation with Mike Pelan, LafargeNote 7 ‐ based on conversation with John Holmes, consultant to National Cement
#### SOUTHEAST CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH, INC., Sydney E. Coon, and Norma S. Coon, Appellants, v. CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF HOLLYWOOD, a national banking association, Appellee.

No. 71-245.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 30, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Louis Weissing, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 241ST DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 14th

day of January, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

FLOYD WOODS, Appellant

NO. 12-14-00358-CR; Trial Court No. 241-1073-14

NO. 12-14-00359-CR; Trial Court No. 241-1074-14

n

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THESE CAUSES came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to 

dismiss the appeals herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED 

and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeals be 

dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 12th day of March, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
# Official Journal C 237/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.237.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 237 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5413 August 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.237.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 237

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5413 August 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 237/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |
| 2011/C 237/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 5 |
| 2011/C 237/03 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (2) | 8 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 237/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

2011/C 237/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

5

2011/C 237/03

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (2)

8

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 237/04 | Euro exchange rates | 9 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 237/04

Euro exchange rates

9

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 237/05 | Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures | 10 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

European Commission

2011/C 237/05

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I to the Treaty |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I to the Treaty

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Gerald A. LEWIS, etc., Appellant, v. INCOME DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al., Appellees.

No. 50382.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 10, 1977.

As Corrected On Denial of Rehearing Jan. 26, 1978.

*1170William B. Corbett, Jr. and Richard E. Gentry, Asst. Gen. Counsels, Tallahassee, for appellant.

John W. McWhirter, Jr., of Cason, McWhirter, Henderson & Stokes, Tampa, for appellees.

BOYD, Justice.

In a certiorari proceeding before the District Court of Appeal, Second District, the constitutional validity of a statute was directly passed upon for the first time in this cause. We have jurisdiction of this appeal. Article V, Section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution.

Subsection (3) of Section 494.08, Florida Statutes, was declared unconstitutional by the District Court. We agree and, because the opinion of the District Court1 is so well written and reasoned, we adopt it as our own.

 We hereby declare subsection (3) of Section 494.08, Florida Statutes, unconstitutional.2 The cause is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion. We approve the District Court’s remand for reconsideration of a lesser penalty appropriate for guilt of the remaining two specifications.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, Jj., concur.

1

. *Income Development Corp.*v. *Lewis,*336 So.2d 440 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

2

. The Legislature may regulate mortgage broker fees and commissions, but it must be done in a way that will give mortgage brokers better notice of what fees and commissions are excessive.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
"THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996."
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              43
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,386
<ALLOWANCES>                                        15
<INVENTORY>                                      1,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,039
<PP&E>                                          13,817
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,337
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,969
<BONDS>                                          4,253
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,497
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,249
<SALES>                                          3,145
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,145
<CGS>                                            2,476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,476
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   230
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    154
<INCOME-TAX>                                        64
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 90
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        90
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Taitron Components Incorporated (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s
knowledge:
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.
    Dated:  March
      31, 2009
                      By:
                      /s/ Stewart WangStewart
      WangChief
      Executive Officer and President(Principal
      Executive Officer)Dated:  March
      31, 2009
                      By:
                      /s/ David VanderhorstDavid
      VanderhorstChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
#### Joseph SILAS, Petitioner, v. The BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DADE COUNTY, Florida, etc., Respondent.

No. 42449.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 19, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 261 So.2d 870.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Lloyd WASHINGTON v. Oliver P. SCHULINGKAMP, Judge, Section “F” Criminal District Court.

No. 62607.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Lloyd Washington applying for writ of mandamus, prohibition. Parish of Orleans.

Not considered. Application has not been made to the trial court since the appeal was finally disposed of.
Document

EXHIBIT 10.2

Performance Guarantee Confirmation
Reference is made to a Performance Guarantee dated as of December 16, 2014 made by the undersigned in favour of the Purchaser (the “Performance Guarantee”).  The undersigned acknowledges and confirms that the performance guarantee remains in full force and effect notwithstanding the entering into of this ninth amendment.   
Dated as of the 15th day of January, 2021.


												
			WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION



	By:	
		Name:    David A. Dykstra
		Title:    Chairman and Chief Operating Officer
		
	By:	
		Name:    Kathleen M. Boege
		Title:    Executive Vice President, General 
    Counsel, and Corporate Secretary







Signature Page to Ninth Amending Agreement
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CHRISTOPHER KING

,

Defendant Below

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE

,

Plaintiff Below

, Appellee. §

§ No. 338 , 2018

§

§ Court Below : Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID Nos. 1408020918 &

§ 1408022997 (K)

§

§

§

Submitted: July 6, 2018

Decided: August 6 , 2018

Before STRINE

, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR

, Justices.

O R D E R

A fter careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s

motion to affirm, and the record, we conclude that the judgment below should be

affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court order, dated June 11, 2018, denying the

appellant’s moti on for a progress report

. The Superior Court was not required to

issue a progress report on the appellant’s service of his twenty

- four

- year, non

suspended Level V sentence

.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Affirm is

GRANTED and the judgm ent of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice