Skip to main content


U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government
              Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you knowDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
                 A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
                  HTTPS**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                 A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
  Menu Close
          HHS Search block
    Search
        








  
  
    

  
      

                                      About HHS
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Programs & Services
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Grants & Contracts
    
                        
                              
      
      
      Laws & Regulations Breadcrumb
    Home
                              About
                              Agencies
                              DAB
                              Decisions
                              ALJ Decisions
                              2018
                              Chinyere Victoria Dimpka, DAB CR5067 (2018)
 Navigate to:
  Departmental Appeals Board (DAB)
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      About DAB
                                            
            
            Organizational Overview
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Who are the Judges?
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Divisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Contact DAB
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Filing an Appeal Online
                                            
            
            DAB E-File
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Operations Division (MOD) E-File
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Different Appeals at DAB
                                            
            
            Appeals to DAB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Procedures
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to Board
                          
            
            Practice Manual
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Guidelines
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Regulations
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      National Coverage Determination Complaints
    
                                                                
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Appeals to the Medicare Appeals Council (Council)
                          
            
            Forms
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Fully Integrated Duals Advantage (FIDA) Demonstration Project
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Alternative Dispute Resolution Services
                                            
            
            Sharing Neutrals
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      ADR Training
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Other ADR Services
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      DAB Decisions
                                            
            
            Board Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      DAB Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Decisions
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Medicare Appeals Council (Council) Decisions
    
                                    
                              
            
      
      
      
      Stakeholder Feedback
    
                                                  
                                                    
            
      
      
      
      Careers
                                            
            
            Open Career Opportunities
    
                                                  
                              
            
      
      
      
      Internships & ExternshipsText resize icon

                    




Chinyere Victoria Dimpka, DAB CR5067 (2018)








  
  
    

  
      
Department of Health and Human Services 
    DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
          Civil Remedies Division





Chinyere Victoria Dimpka
	(OI File No. H-17-40010-9),
	Petitioner,
v.
The Inspector General.
Docket No. C-17-1093Decision No. CR5067April 6, 2018

        
              
    

      DECISION
The Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (the I.G.) excluded Petitioner, Chinyere Victoria Dimpka, from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and all other federal health care programs for five years based on her conviction for a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under the Medicare or a state health care program.  Petitioner sought review of the exclusion.  For the reasons stated below, I affirm the I.G.’s exclusion determination.
I.  Procedural History
By letter dated July 31, 2017, the I.G. notified Petitioner that she was being excluded, effective 20 days from the date of the letter, from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health programs under section 1128(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (Act) (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(1)) for the minimum statutory period of five years.  The I.G. explained he took this action based on Petitioner’s conviction in a Texas court for a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under the Medicare or a state
Page 2
health care program, including the performance of management or administrative services relating to the delivery of such items or services.  I.G. Exhibit (Ex.) 1 at 1.1
On August 15, 2017, Petitioner timely requested a hearing before an administrative law judge.  I held a pre-hearing telephone conference on November 8, 2017, the substance of which is summarized in my November 13, 2017 Order Summarizing Pre-hearing Conference and Setting Briefing Schedule (Summary Order).  *See* 42 C.F.R. § 1005.6.  Among other things, I directed the parties to file pre-hearing briefs articulating their respective arguments as well as identifying witnesses and exhibits in support thereof.  Summary Order at 5-6.
The I.G. filed a brief (I.G. Br.) and four exhibits (I.G. Exs. 1-4), while Petitioner filed a brief (P. Br.) with no exhibits.  The I.G. subsequently filed a reply brief (I.G. Reply).
II.  Decision on the Record
In the absence of objection from Petitioner, I admit I.G. Exs. 1 through 4.
The I.G. does not believe an in-person hearing is necessary to decide this case.  I.G. Br. at 5.  Petitioner requested an in-person hearing to allow her to present testimony from her accountant in order to demonstrate that she was not personally involved in the business she opened, to establish she is not personally responsible for the acts which presumably resulted in her criminal conviction.  P. Br. at 2-3.  However, neither party requested cross-examination of the opposing party’s witnesses.  Therefore, a hearing is unnecessary and the matter may be decided on the written record.  *See*Civ. Remedies Div. Pro. § 19(d).
III.  Issue
Whether the I.G. had a basis to exclude Petitioner from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and all other federal health care programs for five years under 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(1).  *See* 42 C.F.R. § 1001.2007(a)(1).
IV.  Applicable Law
Section 1128(f) of the Act (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(f)) provides Petitioner with rights to an administrative hearing and judicial review of the final action of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary).  The right to a hearing before an ALJ is set forth in 42 C.F.R. §§ 1001.2007(a) and 1005.2, and the rights of both the sanctioned party and the I.G. to participate in a hearing are specified by 42 C.F.R. § 1005.3.
Page 3
The Secretary must exclude from participation in federal health care programs “[a]ny individual or entity that has been convicted of a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under subchapter XVIII of this chapter or under any State health care program.”  42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(1); *see also*42 C.F.R. § 1001.101(a).
An individual is convicted of a criminal offense when:  (1) a judgment of conviction has been entered against him or her in a federal, state, or local court whether an appeal is pending or the record of the conviction is expunged; (2) there is a finding of guilt by a court; (3) a plea of guilty or no contest is accepted by a court; or (4) the individual has entered into any arrangement or program where judgment of conviction is withheld.  42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(i).  The statute does not distinguish between misdemeanor and felony convictions.  There may be no collateral attack of the conviction that provides the basis of the exclusion.  42 C.F.R. § 1001.2007(d).
Section 1128(c)(3)(B) of the Act (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(c)(3)(B)) provides that an exclusion imposed under section 1128(a) of the Act (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)) shall be for a minimum period of five years.  The exclusion is effective twenty days from the date of the notice of exclusion.  42 C.F.R. § 1001.2002(b).  The period of exclusion may be extended based on the presence of specified aggravating factors.  42 C.F.R. § 1001.102(b)*.*  Mitigating factors are considered as a basis for reducing the period of exclusion only if aggravating factors justify an exclusion of longer than five years.  42 C.F.R. § 1001.102(c).
The standard of proof is a preponderance of the evidence.  42 C.F.R. § 1001.2007(c).  Petitioner bears the burden of proof and the burden of persuasion on any affirmative defenses or mitigating factors; the I.G. bears the burden on all other issues.  42 C.F.R. § 1005.15(b).
V.  Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Analysis
My conclusions of law are set forth in bold and followed by pertinent findings of fact and analysis.
**A. Petitioner’s request for hearing was timely, and I have jurisdiction.**
There is no dispute that Petitioner timely requested a hearing.  I therefore have jurisdiction to hear and decide this case.  *See* 42 C.F.R. §§ 1001.2007(a)(1)-(2), 1005.2(a); *see also* 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(f)(1).
Page 4
**B. There is a basis for Petitioner’s exclusion pursuant to section 1128(a)(1) of the Act.**
Exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs is mandated by section 1128(a)(1) of the Act where an individual has been convicted, under Federal or State law, of a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or any state health care program.  42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(1); 42 C.F.R. § 1001.101(a).  The I.G. has established these elements by a preponderance of the evidence.
**1. Petitioner was convicted of a criminal offense within the meaning of section 1128(a)(1) of the Act.**
Petitioner owned Diamex EMS, a provider of ambulance services that improperly billed Medicare for transport of ineligible patients.  I.G. Ex. 4 at 4.  Following a fraud investigation conducted by its Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, the Office of the Texas Attorney General indicted Petitioner on one felony count of Engaging in Organized Criminal Activity.  *Id.* at 5.  On November 30, 2016, Petitioner pleaded guilty to that felony offense.  I.G. Ex. 2 at 1-2.
The Texas state court’s order of deferred adjudication is a conviction within the meaning of the Act, which considers an individual “convicted” of a criminal offense “when the individual . . . has entered into participation in a first offender, deferred adjudication, or other arrangement or program where judgment of conviction has been withheld.”  42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(i)(4); *see also* 42 C.F.R. § 1001.2.  Petitioner’s guilty plea resulted in deferred adjudication and therefore constitutes a “conviction” for a criminal offense as contemplated by 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(1).
Petitioner concedes she was convicted of an offense for which exclusion is required, P. Br. at 2, but now appears to attack her conviction, arguing she was not directly involved in her business and was unaware of the fraudulent billing practices undertaken by her husband and the other employees of the business.  *Id.*at 3.  However, the Secretary’s regulations explicitly prohibit Petitioner from collaterally attacking her conviction before me.  42 C.F.R. § 1001.2007(d) (“When the exclusion is based on the existence of a criminal conviction . . . the basis of the underlying conviction . . . is not reviewable and the individual or entity may not collaterally attack it either on substantive or procedural grounds in this appeal.”).  I therefore conclude that Petitioner was convicted of a criminal offense as contemplated by 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(1).
Page 5
**2. Petitioner’s****criminal offense is related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or a state health care program within the meaning of section 1128(a)(1) of the Act.**
The Act requires Petitioner be excluded from participation in federal programs if she was convicted of an offense relating to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or a state health care program.  *See*42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(1).  The statute requires some “nexus” or “common sense connection” between the offense of which a petitioner was convicted and the delivery of an item or service under a covered program*.  See Berton Siegel, D.O.*, DAB No. 1467 (1994).
Petitioner asserts she was not aware of the billing practices that resulted in her conviction.  P. Br. at 3.  As I explained above, however, I cannot look behind her conviction.  *See*42 C.F.R. § 1001.2007(d).  Looking instead at the facts forming the basis of the offense to which she pleaded guilty, there is no doubt Petitioner’s conviction related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or a state health care program.  Petitioner’s company provided ambulance transportation for Medicare beneficiaries from their residences to non-hospital treatment settings, but billed Medicare as if the transport occurred to hospitals, as Medicare did not cover the former, but only the latter.  I.G. Ex. 4 at 4.  In some instances, Petitioner’s company billed Medicare for ambulance services that never took place, or billed for individual transport of patients who were in fact transported together.  *Id.*
Further, Petitioner admitted in her plea that she acted in concert with other individuals to steal money from Medicare and Texas health care programs.  I.G. Ex. 2 at 1.  The Texas state court with jurisdiction over her case also ordered Petitioner to pay $107,000 in restitution to the victim of the scheme in which she participated, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.  I.G. Ex. 3 at 4.  I therefore conclude that Petitioner was convicted of a criminal offense related to the delivery of an item or service under Medicare or a state health care program as contemplated by 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(1).
**C. Petitioner must be excluded for a minimum of five years; the period of exclusion is therefore reasonable as a matter of law.**
Because I have concluded that a basis exists to exclude Petitioner under 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(3), Petitioner must be excluded for a minimum period of five years.  42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(c)(3)(B); 42 C.F.R. §§ 1001.102(a), 1001.2007(a)(2).  The I.G. has no discretion to impose a lesser period of exclusion, and I may not reduce the period of exclusion below five years.
Page 6
VI.  Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner is excluded from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and all federal health care programs for five years pursuant to section 1128(a)(1) of the Act (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7(a)(1)), effective August 20, 2017.


          /s/
        Bill Thomas

                      Administrative Law Judge
      1. Document 7a in the official case file maintained in the DAB E-File system; for clarity and simplicity, whenever possible I will cite to the exhibits attached to the parties’ respective briefs by the exhibit numbers therein, not the document numbers assigned by the E-file system. back to note 1 Back to top
    Contact HHS
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Careers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      HHS FAQs
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Nondiscrimination NoticeHHS Archive
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Accessibility Statement
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Privacy Policy
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Viewers & PlayersBudget/Performance
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Inspector General
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Web Site Disclaimers
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      EEO/No Fear ActFOIA
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      The White House
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      USA.gov
    
                        
                                            
      
      
      Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
        Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases.

Sign Up
  HHS Headquarters
          200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
                  Washington, D.C. 20201
                  Toll Free Call Center: 1-877-696-6775​ Disclaimer Policy: Links with this icon () mean that you are leaving the HHS website. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot guarantee the accuracy of a non-federal website.
                  Linking to a non-federal website does not mean that HHS or its employees endorse the sponsors, information, or products presented on the website. HHS links outside of itself to provide you with further information.
                  You will be bound by the destination website's privacy policy and/or terms of service when you follow the link.
                  HHS is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on private websites. For more information on HHS's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
 Continue
                  Go back