alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 201 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 201

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 17, 1993.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2403) making appropriations for the Treasury Department, the United 
States Postal Service, the Executive Office of the President, and certain 
Independent Agencies, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for 
other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of 
order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause 7 of 
rule XXI are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the 
bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of 
order under clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI against provisions in the bill are waived 
except as follows: beginning with ``Provided'' on page 17, line 2, through 
``Code:'' on line 5; beginning on page 19, line 22, through page 20, line 16; 
and beginning on page 62, line 22, through page 63, line 2. Where points of 
order are waived against only part of a paragraph, a point of order against 
matter in the balance of the paragraph may be applied only within the balance of 
the paragraph and not against the entire paragraph. It shall be in order to 
consider the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution if offered by a named proponent or a designee. That 
amendment shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified 
in the report equally divided and controlled by its proponent and an opponent, 
and shall not be subject to amendment. All points of order against the amendment 
printed in the report are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill 
for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 
such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[No. 606-1.

Division One—Panel 1.

November 22, 1971.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Richard M. Sattler, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 52990, Solie M. Ringold, J., entered May 26, *9251970. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion pursuant to RCW 2.06.040.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 458 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 458

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 22, 1994.
    Resolved, That during consideration of the bill (H.R. 4602) making 
appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes, all points of 
order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 or 6 of 
rule XXI are waived except as follows: beginning on page 80, line 10, through 
line 19.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

# **SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT**

 
| 1.     |   | XImage Corporation, a California Corporation                                                               |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 2.     |   | ImageWare Systems ID Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly  Imaging Technology Corporation)        |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 3.     |   | I.W. Systems Canada Company, a Nova Scotia unlimited liability  company                                    |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 4.     |   | ImageWare Digital Photography Systems, LLC, a Nevada limited  liability company (formerly Castleworks LLC) |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 5.     |   | E-Focus West LLC, a Nevada limited liability company                                                       |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 6.     |   | Digital Imaging International GmbH, a company formed under German  laws                                    |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 7.     |   | Digital Imaging Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd., a company formed under  Singapore laws                             |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          54,012
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,101
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,898
<PP&E>                                         149,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 186,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,626
<BONDS>                                         33,820
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     28,135
<COMMON>                                           406
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,888
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   186,181
<SALES>                                        121,902
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,902
<CGS>                                           94,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                77,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,362
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (46,078)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       476
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,602)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,602)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.14)
        

</TABLE>
#### Joseph Colpani et al., Respondents, v Prevor Marketing International, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[655 NYS2d 987]

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Prevor Marketing International appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated July 19, 1996, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There exist triable issues of fact with respect to the liability of the defendant Prevor Marketing International *(see, Start v Sugarcreek Stores,*234 AD2d 933; *Farrell v McIntosh, 221*AD2d 312; *Detone v Bullit Courier Serv.,*140 AD2d 278). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
House Calendar No. 144

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 397

[Report No. 103–452]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of a certain motion to

suspend the rules.

MARCH 23, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 144

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 397

[Report No. 103–452]

Providing for consideration of a certain motion to suspend the rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 23, 1994

Mr. FROST, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of a certain motion to suspend

the rules.

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on

2 the legislative day of Thursday, March 24, 1994, for the

3 Speaker to entertain a motion that the House suspend the

4 rules and pass the bill (S. 349) to provide for the disclo5 sure of lobbying activities to influence the Federal Govern6 ment, and for other purposes, as amended, insist on the

7 House amendment thereto, and request a conference with

8 the Senate thereon.
No. 00-915.

#### DuPont *v.*Tangusso et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Fischer Imaging Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Kirwan, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  DAVID KIRWAN |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| David Kirwan                |
| *Chief Financial  Officer*  |
| March 31, 2005              |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on National Science and Engineering Policy (SEP), pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

# TIME AND DATE:

Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 1:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE:

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. An audio link will be available for the public. Members of the public must contact the Board Office to request the public audio link by sending an email to                         *nationalsciencebrd@nsf.gov*                         at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference.                    

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Chair's opening remarks; plans for the July SEP meeting and the status of “Reimagining S&E Indicators”.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Matt Wilson (                        *mbwilson@nsf.gov*), 703/292-7000.                    

                        Meeting information and updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​meetings/​notices/​.jsp#sunshine.*                         Please refer to the National Science Board website                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for additional information.                    

Ann Bushmiller,

Senior Counsel to the National Science Board. 

[FR Doc. 2018-14604 Filed 7-3-18; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
SERVED: MAY 27, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CAROLINA BLUE AIR, LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPIOEAOOIO 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2010-0972 

r< U 

T\!LNT OF 

^OHlATiON 

1 \ A 3:50 

ORDER OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

DISMISSING PROCEEDING WITH PREJUDICE 

By letter dated May 9, 2011, Respondent's Representative states that the parties "have 

reached a settlement in the matter"' and that Respondent withdravk's its "request for a Formal 

Hearing in the above referenced case." Accordingly, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

The FAA shall send the Judge and the Docket a copy of any compromise order or final 

order assessing civil penalty. 

SO ORDERED. 

lie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law 

Attachment - Service List 

' The letter, received via facsimile on May 9, 2011, is not accompanied by a certificate of service, but includes a 

letter, signed by both Respondent's Representative and Complainant's Counsel, confirming the terms of a settlement 

agreement, which include Respondent's filing, by May 9, 2011, "a withdrawal of its request for hearing." The rules 

require filing and service by personal delivery or mail. 14 C.F.R. §§ 13.210(a), 13.211(a). Parties must ensure that 

all submissions are properly filed with the Hearing Docket and serve a copy, with certificate of service, on all parties 

and the Judge. 
'" '*'/ '•j-''^wr'W. '?-\'.tf/-

g ^A ' FAA Docket?^©. CPIOEAOOIO , 

t^ (Civil Penalty A$!tion) 

ORIO] 

federal Aviation Administration 

^Independence Avenue, S.W. 

>yashingt<to, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, ^^ 

Wilbur Wright Building 

Eugene A.. McDonough, Respondent'^ 

pKMSident,lM!illion Air Richmond ,/ TJ^J 

4G0Portu|eeRoad 

Ipci^o^to^mational Airport 

|id&uM % 23250-2417 

tBL: 8PI422-3700 

PAX: it2-40U 

^ciiiaryi^ Berman, Complainant's Cou 

^>ffice ofJie Begional Counsel 

iastem Region 

|A^atV|^I|aza 

&ockaWapB6uIevard 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

IBL : 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

"the Honojabte Ronnie A. Yoder, 

i Chief AdnUnistrative Law Judge 

iJ.S/Depstoi^t of Transportation '• 

§mce of gearings, M-20, Room E12-320 

1200 Nevil<asey Avenue, S.E. 

Washin|i^aDC 20590 

L: Jte66-2142 

AX: 2(i-366-7536 

;,U.S.Mail. Ebr service 

|9i]^^9y(liajPM^CHi..(300 lodependepce A' 

3591; mmoi : Hearing Docket Clerk, 

M^''^tt»n.Cia>tk«Uo4 ;i>&:<ii.«.JS. )BS&.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 548 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 548

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that aviators who 
 meet the qualification standards of the Air Forces Escape and Evasion 
 Society should be granted recognition for meritorious service by the 
                         Department of Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 1994

 Mr. Stearns submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that aviators who 
 meet the qualification standards of the Air Forces Escape and Evasion 
 Society should be granted recognition for meritorious service by the 
                         Department of Defense.

Whereas aviators from throughout the armed forces have served the United States 
        with great courage and distinction in every conflict during this 
        century;
Whereas thousands of aviators, in the course of performing their missions, have 
        been shot down behind enemy lines;
Whereas many of the aviators have overcome long odds and great hardships to 
        return to their units and resume their service to the United States;
Whereas the aviators faced the added responsibility of maintaining the secrecy 
        of their escape and evasion methods in order to protect the lives of 
        those who assisted them and future aviators;
Whereas the secrecy requirement prevented the aviators from petitioning for 
        recognition of their achievements for decades after the fact;
Whereas the Air Forces Escape and Evasion Society has served as the 
        representative for the aviators and established strict qualifications 
        for membership in the organization; and
Whereas the Department of Defense has not provided any specific recognition to 
        aviators who escaped and evaded capture behind enemy lines: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
aviators who meet the qualification standards of the Air Forces Escape 
and Evasion Society should be granted recognition for meritorious 
service by the Department of Defense.
                                 <all>
```
Dallas County 

Public Defender’s Office

 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., 9th Floor, LB 2  Dallas Texas 75207-4313  Phone: (214) 653-3550  Fax: (214) 653-3539 

 September 16, 2015 

Ms. Lisa Matz, Clerk 

Dallas Court of Appeals 

George L. Allen, Sr. Courts Building

600 Commerce Street, Suite 200 

Dallas, Texas 75202-4653 

RE: Troy Hooper v. State of Texas

Trial Court No.: F12-71997-R 

 Appellate Court No.: 05-13-01286-CR

Certification of Compliance with Rule 48.4

Dear Ms. Matz: 

Pursuant to Rule 48.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, I certify that on July 

30, 2015, I sent to Mr. Hooper a copy of this Court’s opinion and judgment, along with 

notification of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review under Rule 68. This 

notification was sent certified mail, return receipt requested, to Mr. Hooper at his last known 

address. 

I have enclosed a copy of the return receipt, received by our office on August 10, 

2015. The date of delivery is reflected as August 6, 2015. Please include this letter in the 

official papers in this cause. 

Thank you for your assistance in this matter. 

 Sincerely, 

 /s/ Julie Woods

 Julie Woods 

 Assistant Public Defender 

Enclosure

cc: Dallas County Criminal District Attorney’s Office, Appellate Section

ACCEPTED

05-13-01286-CR

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

9/17/2015 9:42:37 AM

LISA MATZ

CLERK

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 9/17/2015 9:42:37 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
111 Complete items 1~ 2, and 3. Also complete 

item 4 jf Restricted Delivery is desired~ 

!II Print your nam~ and address on-th,e revefSe 

so that we can return t.he card to you . 

• Attach this card to the back ofthe mailpieceJ 

or on the front if space permits. 

1. Article Addressed to: 

D. Is delivery address i 

If YES. enter delivery address below: D No 

3. Service Type 

hi Certifjed Mail® 

fI Registered 

o Insured 

o Priority Mail Express""" 

o Return Receipt for Merchandise 

o I 

2. Article Number 

~ (Transfer from Service label) 7013 2250 0002 2038 9084 

PS Form 381 1, July 201 ~ Domestic Return Receipt
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BONTEX,
INC.'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AS SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
10-Q, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,621
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,367
<ALLOWANCES>                                       214
<INVENTORY>                                      5,760
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,323
<PP&E>                                          22,231
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,622
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,691
<BONDS>                                          2,387
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              157
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,779
<SALES>                                         22,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,718
<CGS>                                           15,741
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   617
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    763
<INCOME-TAX>                                       302
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                461
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       461
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>