alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 395/30 D

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 395 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4930 December 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 395

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4930 December 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC) No 1897/2006 of 19 December 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 temporarily suspending the autonomous common customs tariff duties on certain industrial, agricultural and fishery products | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 1897/2006 of 19 December 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 temporarily suspending the autonomous common customs tariff duties on certain industrial, agricultural and fishery products

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### John A. LESSER v. CITY OF BATON ROUGE, PARISH OF BATON ROUGE, State of Louisiana.

No. 61988.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 5, 1978.

In re: John A. Lesser, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ withdrawn as moot.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 104

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for one-half of

the expenses of investigations and studies by the Joint Committee on

the Organization of the Congress in the first session of the One Hundred

Third Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1993

Mr. HAMILTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House

for one-half of the expenses of investigations and studies

by the Joint Committee on the Organization of the Congress in the first session of the One Hundred Third

Congress.

1 Resolved, That (a) for one-half of the expenses of in2 vestigations and studies by the Joint Committee on the

3 Organization of the Congress (hereinafter in this resolu4 tion referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including expenses

5 for procurement of consultant services under section

6 202(i) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946,
2

•HRES 104 IH

1 there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House

2 not more than $495,000.

3 (b) Not more than $50,000 of the amount specified

4 in subsection (a) may be used for consultant services re5 ferred to in such subsection.

6 SEC. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made

7 on vouchers signed by the House of Representatives co8 chairman of the Committee and approved by the Commit9 tee on House Administration.

10 SEC. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolu11 tion for investigations and studies carried out during the

12 period beginning at noon on January 3, 1993, and ending

13 on December 31, 1993.

14 SEC. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution

15 shall be expended in accordance with regulations pre16 scribed by the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice of charter renewal.

# SUMMARY:

                        This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act of October 6, 1972, that the Board of                               ( print page 30731)                            Scientific Counselors, National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (BSC, NCEH/ATSDR), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through May 21, 2020.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Cibulas, Ph.D., Designated Federal Officer, Board of Scientific Counselors, National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Department of Health and Human Services, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop F45, Chamblee, Georgia 30341, telephone (770) 488-0662 or fax (770) 488-3377.

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Elaine Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2018-13993 Filed 6-28-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 25 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 25

    Congratulating the people of India on the occasion of the 46th 
              anniversary of their nation's independence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Stearns submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Congratulating the people of India on the occasion of the 46th 
              anniversary of their nation's independence.

Whereas, on August 15, 1947, the people of India were granted their independence 
        from the British Empire;
Whereas the people of India have maintained a free and democratic nation for 46 
        years;
Whereas the Republic of India is the largest democracy in the world;
Whereas the people of the United States seek to maintain friendly ties with the 
        democratic nations of the world; and
Whereas the recent decline in world tensions offers new opportunities for 
        international cooperation at every level: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the people of India on the occasion of 
        the 45th anniversary of India's independence from the British 
        Empire, which will be celebrated on August 14, 1993; and
            (2) looks forward to the continuance of friendly relations 
        between the people of the United States and the people of 
        India.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SIMCALA, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          16,190<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,992
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,051
<PP&E>                                          57,740
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,532
<BONDS>                                         81,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,807
<OTHER-SE>                                      (6,630)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,209
<SALES>                                         55,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,230
<CGS>                                           51,745
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   915
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,587
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,215)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,363)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,853)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,853)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>OF THIS AMOUNT, 6,371 WAS RESTRICTED CASH
</FN>


</TABLE>
H. Res. 393

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

March 23, 1994.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 1804) to improve learning and teaching by providing a national framework for education reform; to promote

the research, consensus building, and systemic changes needed to ensure equitable educational opportunities and high levels of educational achievement for all students; to provide a

framework for reauthorization of all Federal education programs; to promote the development and adoption of a voluntary national system of skill standards and certifications;

and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The

conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### R. H. ALAGOOD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BOSSIER PRESS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13347.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Sept. 26, 1977.

James B. Wells & Associates by A. R. Snell, Bossier City, for defendant-appellant.

Naff, Kennedy, Goodman, Stephens, Donovan & Parnall by Robert J. Donovan, Jr., Shreveport, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BOLIN, PRICE and MARVIN, JJ.

BOLIN, Judge.

Plaintiff, assignee for an office supply company, sued defendant newspaper company for the balance due on an open account. Defendant denied the debt, claiming the parties had a “trade out” agreement whereby defendant was to pay for the merchandise by running advertisements for the supply company in its newspaper. The trial court found only a portion of the debt was paid by the “trade out” and rendered judgment in plaintiff’s favor for the balance. Defendant appeals and we affirm.

The issue is whether the record supports the findings of the trial judge.

Appellant contends the trial judge erred in according any weight to the testimony of plaintiff’s principal witness, a salesman and officer of the supply company. The trier of fact is in much better position than are we to determine the credibility of witnesses, and we find no reason nor basis for disagreeing with his findings in this case.

We adopt the written reasons of the trial court and the judgment is affirmed at appellant’s cost.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert White, Appellant.

[721 NYS2d 767]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Visitacion-Lewis, J.), rendered June 1, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fifth degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years and 3 to 6 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490). There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility *(see, People v Applewhite,*202 AD2d 250, *lv denied*83 NY2d 868).

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Mazzarelli, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 13, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-01222-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF D.C. AND Q.C., CHILDREN
On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-01053-2013



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Ju stices Lang-Miers and Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Before the Court is appellant’s amended moti on to withdraw the appeal. Appellant has

informed the Court that she is unable to continue with the appeal. We grant appellant’s amended
motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

141222F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF D.C. AND Q.C., CHILDREN

No. 05-14-01222-CV On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. 429-01053-2013. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered July 13, 2015.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 244 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 244

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that the 
membership of the Committee on the Rules reflect the ratio of majority 
    to minority party Members of the House at the beginning of the 
                               Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 5, 1993

  Mr. Buyer (for himself, Mr. Fawell, Mr. Livingston, Mr. Quinn, Mr. 
  Istook, Mr. Huffington, Mr. Horn, Mr. Everett, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. 
   Greenwood, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Portman, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
  Calvert, Mr. Grams, Mr. Torkildsen, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. McInnis, Mr. 
Miller of Florida, Mr. Inglis of South Carolina, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. 
 McKeon, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. 
Boehlert, Mr. Solomon, Mr. Doolittle, Mrs. Meyers of Kansas, Mr. Goss, 
Mr. Zimmer, Mrs. Fowler, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Linder, Mr. Petri, Mr. McHugh, 
  Mr. Herger, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Ravenel, Mr. 
 Ramstad, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. Quillen, Mr. Bachus of Alabama, Mr. Canady, 
   Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Blute, Mr. Castle, Mr. Klug, Mr. McCollum, Mr. 
   Schaefer, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, and Mr. Talent) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that the 
membership of the Committee on the Rules reflect the ratio of majority 
    to minority party Members of the House at the beginning of the 
                               Congress.

    Resolved, That clause 6(a) of rule X of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
    ``(3) The membership of the Committee on Rules (and of each of its 
subcommittees) shall reflect the ratio of the majority to minority 
party Members of the House at the beginning of the Congress.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### PIPING INDUSTRY PROGRAM, and Insurance Company of North America, Petitioner, v. Ira Parke SYERS, and Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 40947.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 29, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
SCPW-18-0000466

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

OKHOO HANES, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE HILARY B. GANGNES, Judge of the 

District Court of the First Circuit, Respondent Judge, 

and

SCOTTRADE, INC. and ED BARAOIDAN, Respondents.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CIV. NO. 1SC17-1-2015)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

AND/OR PROHIBITION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ., and

Circuit Judge Browning, in place of McKenna, J., recused)

Upon consideration of petitioner Okhoo Hanes’s petition

for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition, filed on June 1, 2018,

the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof,

and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate

that she is entitled to the requested relief sought by way of an

extraordinary writ. See HRS §§ 633-27 and 633-28; Kema v.

Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of

mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-18-0000466

15-JUN-2018

08:38 AM
the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to

relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the

alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); Honolulu

Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao, 59 Haw. 237, 241, 580 P.2d 58, 62

(1978) (a writ of mandamus and a writ of prohibition are

extraordinary remedies meant to, among other things, restrain a

judge of an inferior court from acting beyond or in excess of his

or her jurisdiction; they are not intended to supersede the legal

discretionary authority of the trial courts or cure a mere legal

error). Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

mandamus and/or prohibition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 15, 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ R. Mark Browning

2
#### LEWIS *v.*WARDEN OF THE MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

[App. No. 35,

September Term, 1962.]

*Decided November 13, 1962.*

Before Bruñe, C. J., and Henderson, Hammond, Prescott, Horney, Marbury and Sybert, JJ.

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated by Judge Dorsey for dismissing the petition, the application for leave to appeal is denied.

*Application denied.*
#### Matter of the Supplementary Proceedings of Simon Eigenmacht, Judgment-Creditor-Respondent, v*.*Peter Herter, Judgment-DebtorAppellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

December, 1911.)

Appeal — Decision — Modification and correction of errors — Exercise of. discretion by court below.

Contempt — Punishment—Amount of fine — Court’s discretion.

Where it does not appear that a judgment creditor has suffered any actual loss or damage by reason of his judgment debtor’s violation of an order in supplementary proceedings, the amount of the fine for contempt of court is in the discretion of the justice granting the order; and the court on appeal has no right to fix the amount.

■ Appeal by the judgment-debtor from an order, of the City Court of the city of Hew York adjudging him guilty of a contempt of court and directing that upon his failure to pay the sum of $448.15 he should be committed to the county jail.

John F. Ooffin, for appellant.

Bernard L. Karliner, for respondent.

*Per Gwriam.*

The justice at Special Term has adjudged that the judgment-debtor is guilty of a contempt of court and that his misconduct was calculated to and did defeat, im*406pair and prejudice the rights and remedies of the judgment-creditor to his actual loss and damage in the sum of $448.15 and then fined him this amount. There is no evidence to support the finding that the judgment-creditor has suffered any actual loss or damage and the order must be reversed on the authority of Ross v. La Cagnina, 68 Misc. Rep. 497.

We have not overlooked that in the case of Roos v. Treubig, 125 N. Y. Supp. 782, this court under similar circumstances, instead of reversing the order, modified it by imposing a fine of $250 and costs. It seems to us that, where the amount of the fine is based upon an erroneous finding of actual loss and damage, this court should not undertake to fix the amount of the fine. The Special Term has the right in its discretion to determine the amount of the fine where no actual loss is shown, and the appellate court has no right to substitute its own discretion.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present:. Giegerich, Lehman and Pendleton, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
TYREESE FAUST

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 4303

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 26, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Frank E. Sheffield , Judge

.

Kevin Robert Alvarez of Anabelle Dias P.A., Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney

General , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF

, B.L. THOMAS

, and OSTERHAUS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Liberty and union, now and forever Abraham Lincoln, 

welcome! 

The President visits the Government Printing Office 

GPO History Talk  February 26, 2013 

 IN october 1863 

GPO had been in business just over three years, at the corner of  North Capitol and H Streets in Northwest 

Washington. 

At the helm was John D Defrees, the Indiana newspaperman whom President 

Lincoln appointed a few weeks after taking office in March, 1861 

Defrees and lincoln were political allies, Defrees having worked hard for Lincoln’s win in Indiana in 1860. They formed a solid working relationship as well, with Defrees acting as a trusted editor. 

By any measure 

GPO’s first few years were a success. The volume of  work steadily 

increased, and savings over the previous contracting system were 

immediate and substantial. 

In 1863 Defrees was able to report that work in the plant was increasing  steadily and 

that thes avings to the taxpayer for that year alone were $280,961 over charges 

for the same work under pre-GPO formulas. The total saved since the 

start of  GPO was computed at $583,935 

In the autumn of  1863, Defrees invited the President to visit GPO and on Saturday, October 

24, Lincoln arrived. 

Two of washington’s 

daily newspapers, the Evening Star and the Daily National Republican 

reported on the visit in their editions for Monday, October 26, 1863 

The star gave it fuller coverage 

It’s interesting 

to note that there were features of  this visit 

that are still part of  GPO celebrations today, including the singing!