alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 99.24**

 

**CONSENT OF DAN MACKIE**

** **

March 15, 2012

 

Brigus Gold Corp.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

 

**Re: Brigus Gold Corp.**

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

I hereby consent to (i) the use of my name in connection withthe following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F forthe year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 40-F”) of Brigus Gold Corp. (the “Company”) to which this consentrelates: (A) the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report, Pre-feasibility Study, Brigus Gold Corp., GoldfieldsProject, Saskatchewan, Canada” dated effective October 6, 2011 (the “Report”), (B) the Company’s AnnualInformation Form for the year ended December 31, 2011 and (C) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis forthe year ended December 31, 2011, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report in theRegistration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-113889, 333-162558 and 333-167757), as amended, and Form F-10 (File No. 333-174604),as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commissionpursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectusesor amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference inthe above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.

 

Sincerely,
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
  /s/ Marshall O. LarsenName: Marshall O. LarsenTitle: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Scott E. KuechleName: Scott E. KuechleTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# SIN 532112
254 La. 786

#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Alfred Bernet BROWNE et al.

No. 50026.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 8, 1969.

In re: Alfred Bernet Browne et al applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Iberville. 224 So.2d 51.

Writ Refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.

SANDERS and SUMMERS, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gold Standard, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), We, Scott L. Smith, President and director and Bret C. Decker,
Secretary of our Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

Dated: 3/16/05                           /s/Scott L. Smith
      --------------                     ---------------------------
                                         Scott L. Smith
                                         President and director


Dated: 3/16/05                           /s/Bret C. Decker
      --------------                     ---------------------------
                                         Bret C. Decker
                                         Secretary and director
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                               COUNSEL CORPORATION
                             OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

June 30, 2003

         The undersigned Allan Silber, duly appointed and incumbent officer of
Counsel Corporation, a Canadian Corporation ("Corporation"), in connection with
the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the annual period ended
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), does hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that to the best
of his knowledge:

        (a)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (b)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Corporation.


         By:      /s/ Allan Silber
                  ------------------------------
         Name:    Allan Silber
         Title:   Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 156 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 156

   Repealing rule XLIX of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
          relating to the statutory limit on the public debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 1993

 Mr. Stearns submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Repealing rule XLIX of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
          relating to the statutory limit on the public debt.

    Resolved, That rule XLIX of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is repealed.

                                 <all>
```
# Refund

                - Title:  Refund 
                - Form #:         GSA3635      
                - Current Revision Date:  03/2011
                - Authority or Regulation:  

PDF versions of forms use Adobe      ReaderTM.      Download Adobe ReaderTM

Search for another form

Print PageEmail Page

Top
#### LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. George W. WILSON et al.

No. 54080.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1973.

In re: Thomas C. Watson and Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 282 So.2d 745.

Writ denied. On the facts found, the judgment of the Court of Appeal is correct.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion that an error of law, probably affecting the result, was made by the Court of Appeal. Under existing jurisprudence, R.S. 32:234 does not control when an intersection is controlled by both red and yellow flashing lights.
[No. 976-1.

Division One—Panel 1.

May 30, 1972.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael Thomas McKnight *et al., Appellants.*
#### *In re*EDDY ESTATE. APPEALS BY CYNTHIA MILLS CLEVELAND.

Supplemental Opinion.

1. Trusts — Attorney Fees — Evidence.

Allowance of fee of $22,500 for attorneys for testamentary trustee is affirmed under testimony taken pursuant to reference by the Supreme Court.

2. Costs — Consolidated Appeals — Attorney Pees — Order op Reference.

Costs are allowed to appellee testamentary trustee upon affirmance of all orders and judgments in consolidated appeals, except costs resulting from hearing before circuit court commissioner on Supreme Court’s order of reference with respeet to reasonableness of fees for attorney for testamentary trustee.

References for Points in Headnotes

[1,2] 54 Am Jur, Trusts § C36.

Appeal from Saginaw; Huff (Eugene Snow), J.

Submitted June 5, 1958.

(Docket Nos. 31-36, Calendar Nos. 47,606-47,611.)

Decided April 14, 1959.

Rehearing denied June 5, 1959.

In the matter of the testamentary trust established by the will of Arthur D. Eddy, deceased. In compliance with Supreme Court’s order of reference, testimony in respect to reasonableness of attorney fees was taken and filed.

Orders of lower court affirmed.

*William Alfred Lucking,*for plaintiff.

*John D. Currie, Gilbert A. Currie*and *Thomas G. Long,*for defendants.

*121Kelly, J.

In our decision of October 13, 1958, in the above ease, reported in 354 Michigan 334, we stated (pp 352, 353):

“We reserve judgment as to whether fees in the amount of $22,500 allowed attorneys O’Keefe and Rockwith were reasonable, and we refer this question to the circuit court with instructions that a circuit court commissioner be designated for the sole purpose of taking any further proof that either appellant or appellees desires to introduce in regard to the reasonableness of the legal fees paid to attorneys O’Keefe and Rockwith. Ten copies of such testimony shall be forwarded by said circuit court commissioner to the clerk of this Court.”

The hearing before the circuit court commissioner was held on January 23, 1959. Testimony was offered on behalf of appellee by attorneys Jerome Weadock, Carl H. Smith, Sr., and Karl K. Leibrand. No testimony was offered by appellant.

The testimony establishes that the attorney fees of $15,000 to William 0. O’Keefe and $7,500 to Frank A. Rockwith were reasonable, and the trial court’s allowance of such fees is affirmed.

This concludes all matters presented in these appeals, and the findings of the trial court in the respective cases are affirmed. Costs to appellee, with the exception of the costs resulting from the hearing before the circuit court commissioner which are to be taxed against appellee.

Dethmers, O. J., and Carr, Smith, Black, Edwards, Voelkbr, and Kavanagh, JJ., concurred.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. AM A NDA FR IER , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-10469

D.C . No. 2:12-c r-00372-GM N M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ne v a da Gloria M . Nava rro, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d M arc h 10, 2014 ** B e fore : PR EGER SON, LEAVY, a n d M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s . Am anda Frie r a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 46-m onth se nte nc e im

pose d following her guilty -ple a c onvic tion for posse ssion of a fire arm by

a c onvic te d fe lon, in viola

tion of 18 U.S.C . §§ 922(g)(1) a nd 924(a )(2). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED

MAR 13 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Frie r first c onte nds tha t the distric t c ourt did not c onside r he r m i tiga ting argum e nts. There c ord be lie s this c onte ntion. Frie r ne xt c o n te nds tha t the se nte nc e is substa n tive ly unre a sona

ble in light of her history

and c ha ra c t e ristic s. The distric t c o urt did not a

buse its disc re tion in im

posing Frie r’ s se nte n c e . Se e Gall v . Unite d State s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The low-e nd Guide line s se n te nc e is substa ntive ly re a sona ble in light of the

18 U.S.C . § 3553(a) se nte nc ing fa c tors a nd the t ota lity of the c irc um sta n c e s, inc luding Frie r’ s c rim ina l history and the ne e d to prote c t the public . S

e e id . AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 0 4 6 9 2
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 3

Authorizing the Speaker to appoint a committee of two Members to join

with a like committee of the Senate to notify the President that a

quorum of each House has been assembled and that the Congress is

ready to receive any communications he may be pleased to make.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. GEPHARDT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the Speaker to appoint a committee of two Members to join with a like committee of the Senate to

notify the President that a quorum of each House has

been assembled and that the Congress is ready to receive

any communications he may be pleased to make.

1 Resolved, That a committee of two Members be ap2 pointed by the Speaker on the part of the House of Rep3 resentatives to join with a committee on the part of the

4 Senate to notify the President of the United States that

5 a quorum of each House has assembled and Congress is

6 ready to receive any communication that he may be

7 pleased to make.
2

•HRES 3 ATH

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 127 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 127

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress, in 
    providing funds for any fiscal year for programs to assist the 
 homeless, should appropriate one-third of those funds for programs to 
assist the homeless that are administered by the Secretary of Veterans 
                                Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1993

Mr. Stump submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress, in 
    providing funds for any fiscal year for programs to assist the 
 homeless, should appropriate one-third of those funds for programs to 
assist the homeless that are administered by the Secretary of Veterans 
                                Affairs.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
one-third of the funds appropriated for any fiscal year for programs to 
assist the homeless should be appropriated to the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs for programs to assist homeless veterans that are administered 
by that Secretary.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 12 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 12

    Providing for mandatory drug testing of Members of the House of 
                            Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

Mr. Barton of Texas (for himself, Mr. Shays, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, 
Mr. Bliley, and Mr. Ramstad), submitted the following resolution; which 
         was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for mandatory drug testing of Members of the House of 
                            Representatives.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. MANDATORY DRUG TESTING OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF 
              REPRESENTATIVES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any law, rule, or other authority 
to the contrary, the contingent fund of the House of Representatives 
shall be available for payment of expenses of a program for testing of 
Members of Congress for illegal use of controlled substances.
    (b) Contract for Testing Services.--Not later than 6 months after 
the date on which this resolution is agreed to, the Clerk of the House 
of Representatives shall contract with a private, nongovernmental 
entity for testing services to carry out subsection (a).
    (c) Procedures.--The testing program under this resolution--
            (1) shall be mandatory for each Member of the House of 
        Representatives;
            (2) except as otherwise provided in this resolution, shall 
        be conducted in accordance with the Mandatory Guidelines for 
        Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs, as prescribed pursuant 
        to section 503 of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1987 (5 
        U.S.C. 7301 note);
            (3) shall be carried out so that 10 percent of the Members 
        are randomly tested in each month;
            (4) shall require that the final results of each test be 
        provided to (A) the Member involved and (B) the Committee on 
        Standards of Official Conduct, which, in any case of positive 
        results, shall take such action as may be necessary under the 
        rules of the House of Representatives; and
            (5) shall require that the final results of each test be 
        included in a biennial report of the Clerk of the House of 
        Representatives and printed as a House document in October of 
        each even-numbered year.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    As used in this resolution--
            (1) the term ``controlled substance'' has the meaning given 
        that term in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 
        U.S.C. 802); and
            (2) the term ``Member of the House of Representatives'' 
        means a Representative in, or a Delegate or Resident 
        Commissioner to, the Congress.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.2


 


CYCLACEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


200 Connell Drive, Suite 1500


Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922


 


January 14, 2021


 


Mr. Paul McBarron


c/o Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


200 Connell Drive, Suite 1500


Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922


 


Dear Mr. McBarron:


 


Reference is made to the agreement between
us (the “Agreement”) made as of January 1, 2019. This will confirm our agreement to extend the Agreement through the
period ended June 30, 2021, effective as of January 1, 2021. Please confirm your agreement to the foregoing by signing below in
the space provided.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	CYCLACEL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Spiro Rombotis
	 	Name:	Spiro Rombotis
	 	Title:	President & CEO


 


	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:	 
	 	 
	/s/ Paul McBarron	 
	Paul McBarron
EXHIBIT 32.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF DATASTREAM SYSTEMS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Datastream
Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned C. Alex Estevez, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ C. ALEX ESTEVEZC. Alex EstevezPresident and Chief Financial OfficerDatastream Systems, Inc.September 15, 2005
# Managing the federal rulemaking process

Together the eRulemaking Program Management Office and the Regulatory Information Service Center manage a suite of systems that support the federal rulemaking process.

Learn more about how members of the public canparticipate in federal rulemaking.

Print PageEmail Page

Top

-  Regulations-  Overview 
-  Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 
-  Federal management regulation 
-  Federal travel regulation 
-  Managing the federal rulemaking process (eRulemaking)    -  How members of the public can contribute to the re 
  -  Services for federal rulemaking agencies
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 388 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 388

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 23, 1994.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3345) to amend title 
5, United States Code, to eliminate certain restrictions on employee training; 
to provide temporary authority to agencies relating to voluntary separation 
incentive payments; and for other purposes. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference 
report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Louis F. LUCIO.

No. 61352.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 19, 1978.

A. J. Boudreaux, Staff Appeals Counsel, Indigent Defender Bd., New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John M. Mam-oulides, Dist. Atty., James D. Maxwell, Asst. Dist. Atty., Abbott J. Reeves, Director, Research and Appeals Div., Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged by bill of information with the crime of aggravated battery, La. R.S. 14:34. The defendant was found guilty as charged and sentenced to serve ten years at hard labor. On appeal he relies on two assignments of error for reversal of his conviction and sentence.

We have examined the entire record and find that the errors complained of probably did not result in a miscarriage of justice, were not prejudicial to the substantial rights of accused, and did not constitute a substantial violation of a constitutional or statutory right. Accordingly, we affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence.

CALOGERO, J., concurs and assigns reasons.

CALOGERO, Justice,

concurring.

By assignment of error number 1 defendant properly complains of inadmissible hearsay. What an officer had related to him by witnesses about the event shortly after the stabbing was not part of the res *985gestae, as the state contends. Nonetheless, I concur in the affirmance of this conviction believing that there was insufficient prejudice to warrant a reversal.
#### Catherine MERCOGLIANO, Petitioner, v. EMPIRE STATE ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 43281.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 15, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

ERVIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.