alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

GENOVESE DRUG STORES, INC.
EXHIBIT 11
----------
STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Twelve Weeks Ended          Forty Weeks Ended
                                                 -------------------------   -------------------------
                                                 November 6,   November 7,   November 6,   November 7,
                                                        1998          1997          1998          1997
                                                 -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                                              <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>        

Weighted average shares outstanding (a)               13,756        13,661        13,740        13,620

Equivalent shares - dilutive stock bonus (a)              27            70            27            70

Equivalent shares - dilutive stock options (a)           280           237           305           211
                                                 -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------

Dilutive shares outstanding (a)                       14,063        13,968        14,072        13,901
                                                 ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========

Net income                                       $     2,528   $       517   $     6,975   $     3,629
                                                 ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========

Net income per common share (a) - Basic          $       .18   $       .04   $       .51   $       .27
                                                 ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========

Net income per common share (a) - Diluted        $       .18   $       .04   $       .50   $       .26
                                                 ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
</TABLE>


(a)      Adjusted, where appropriate, to retroactively reflect the effect of a
         10 percent stock dividend distributed on January 14, 1998.

                                       9
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 179 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 179

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 25, 1993.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (S. 1) to amend the Public 
Health Service Act to revise and extend the programs of the National Institutes 
of Health, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 131 (Monday, July 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14526]



[[Page 31781]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

National Institute of Corrections


Advisory Board; Notice of Meeting

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of the National 
Institute of Corrections (NIC) Advisory Board. The meeting will be open 
to the public.
    Name of the Committee: NIC Advisory Board.
    General Function of the Committee: To aid the National Institute of 
Corrections in developing long-range plans, advise on program 
development, and recommend guidance to assist NIC's efforts in the 
areas of training, technical assistance, information services, and 
policy/program development assistance to Federal, state, and local 
corrections agencies.
    Date and Time: 8:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m. on Friday, August 17, 2018.
    Location: National Institute of Corrections, 500 First Street NW, 
2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20534, (202) 514-4202.
    Contact Person: Shaina Vanek, Acting Director, National Institute 
of Corrections, 320 First Street NW, Room 5002, Washington, DC 20534. 
To contact Ms. Vanek, please call (202) 514-4202.
    Agenda: On August 17, 2018, the Advisory Board will discuss/address 
the following topics: (1) Brief Agency Report from the NIC Acting 
Director, (2) briefings from NIC Division Chiefs, and (3) updates from 
partner agencies and associations.
    Procedure: On August 17, 2018, the meeting is open to the public. 
Interested persons may present data, information, or views, orally or 
in writing, on issues pending before the committee. Written submissions 
may be made to the contact person on or before August 13, 2018. Oral 
presentations from the public will be scheduled between approximately 
11:15 a.m. to 11:45 a.m. and 3:45 p.m. and 4:15 p.m. on August 17, 
2018. Time allotted for each presentation may be limited. Those 
desiring to make formal oral presentations should notify the contact 
person and submit a brief statement of the general nature of the 
evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of 
proposed participants, and an indication of the approximate time 
requested to make their presentation on or before August 13, 2018.
    General Information: NIC welcomes the attendance of the public at 
its advisory committee meetings and will make every effort to 
accommodate persons with physical disabilities or special needs. If you 
require special accommodations due to a disability, please contact 
Shaina Vanek at least 7 days in advance of the meeting. Notice of this 
meeting is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 
app. 2).

Shaina Vanek,
Acting Director, National Institute of Corrections.
[FR Doc. 2018-14526 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-36-M
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 309

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a twothirds, rollcall vote to increase the statutory limit on the public debt.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 10, 1993

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself and Mr. HALL of Texas) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

require a two-thirds, rollcall vote to increase the statutory limit on the public debt.

1 Resolved, That rule XLIX of the Rules of the House

2 of Representatives is amended to read as follows:

3 ‘‘RULE XLII

4 ‘‘INCREASING THE STATUTORY LIMIT ON THE PUBLIC

5 DEBT

6 ‘‘1. It shall not be in order to pass or adopt, as the

7 case may be, any bill or joint resolution, or conference re8 port thereon, increasing the statutory limit on the public

9 debt except—
2

•HRES 309 IH

1 ‘‘(1) by a rollcall vote, and the yeas and nays

2 shall be considered as ordered; and

3 ‘‘(2) upon the affirmative vote of two-thirds of

4 those voting, a quorum being present.

5 ‘‘2. The House may waive the provisions of clause

6 1 for any fiscal year during which a declaration of war

7 is in effect.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Sierra Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Denis Atkins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: October 22, 2008

/s/ Dennis AtkinsDennis AtkinsChief Financial Officer



1

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Floyd J. LEONARD.

No. 62723.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 15, 1978.

In re: Floyd J. Leonard, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Terrebonne.

Writ denied.
House Calendar No. 107

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 287

[Report No. 103–310]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution

other purposes.propriations for the fiscal year 1994, and for(H.J. Res. 283) making further continuing apOCTOBER 27, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 107

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 287

[Report No. 103–310]

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 283) making

further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1994, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 27, 1993

Mr. MOAKLEY, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order, any rule of the House to the contrary

3 notwithstanding, to consider in the House the joint resolu4 tion (H.J. Res. 283) making further continuing appropria5 tions for the fiscal year 1994, and for other purposes. De6 bate on the joint resolution shall not exceed one hour

7 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank8 ing minority member of the Committee on Appropriations.

9 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on
2

HRES 287 RH

1 the joint resolution to final passage without intervening

2 motion except one motion to recommit.
#### THE STATE *vs.*HUGH LAFFERTY.

Police officers of Wilmington;—their duty in making arrests of disorderly persons.

The defendant was indicted for an assault and battery on Samuel Barclay.

The defendant was a city watchman and arrested the prosecuting witness at a house in Fifth street, between Orange and Tatnall, about half past 11 o’clock at night. Barclay resisted and after-wards fled. Lafferty struck him several times with a stick. When arrested Barclay was seated with others at a table playing dominoes and drinking beer.

The case rested on the questions whether the defendant arrested Barclay under circumstances requiring the interference of the police officers; and whether, after the arrest, he used unnecessary force and violence in attempting to carry him to a place of custody.

*By the*Court.

The watchmen of Wilmington are officers to put a stop to disorder in that city; and if necessary, to arrest and detain disorderly and riotous persons. Such officers have the right, and it is their duty, to arrest all drunken and disorderly persons who are disturbing the public peace. It is their duty to arrest persons who are not drunken, if by their noise and disorder they are disturbing the public peace and annoying the citizens generally, It has been held to be an indictable offence to blow a trumpet at night through the streets. And if these and all other peace officers were prompt in discharging their duty, there would be fewer indictments of disorderly houses, and fewer complaints of disorderly conduct, leading to riots and breaches of the peace. The entry of such houses by the officers to suppress disorder, and the arrest of disorderly persons therein, is commendable; and for the public good such officers ought to have every reasonable countenance and protection^ by the court and jury.^ The limit to that protection is where officer *abuses*his power by arresting a person who is not disorderly or connected with disorderly persons; or who does not resist, or make force necessary. The officer has no right to use force where no force is necessary, or reasonably anticipated to be necessary; nor ever to beat an unresisting man. For such abuse of authority he would be very properly held responsible even to an *exemplary*extent ; but where he keeps within the line of his duty he is entitled to protection. The jury will judge of this matter from the evidence.

Verdict guilty—fine $5 and costs.
# Realty Services Overview

GSA provides workspace and related services for over 100 federal client agencies serving more than one million workers through the GSA's Public Buildings Service. Whenever possible, client agencies are located in existing government-owned space. If suitable space in the government inventory is not available, GSA acquires leased space in privately owned buildings.

GSA also provides related real estate services including the operation and maintenance of buildings and outleasing programs. Real estate services provided to clients appear in federal agencies’ monthly electronic rent bills. GSA has simplified these bills so agencies have a clearer understanding of the costs they are charged for their workspace and services.

## Find your agency's telework coordinator

## Leasing Policy and Procedures

                            - National Broker Contract
                            - Security Standards for Leased Buildings
                            - Lease Inventory

## Real Property Disposal

                            - Outleasing
                            - How to Dispose of Federal Real Property
                            - The Disposal Process
                            - Finding Federal Property
                            - Excess Real Property Available to Federal Agencies
                            - Surplus Real Property Available for Public Use

## National Accounts Program

                            - National Accounts Teams

## Rental Policy and Procedures

                            - Pricing Policy
                            - Reimbursable Work Authorizations
                            - Rent Library

## Site Selection & Relocation

                            - Site Selection Guide [PDF - 2 MB]
                            - Site Acquisition Handbook Brochure [PDF - 1 MB]

Print PageEmail Page

Top

-  Real Estate Services-  Overview 
-  Leasing 
-  Reimbursable Services Program 
-  Rental policy and procedures 
-  Site Selection & Relocation 
-  For Businesses Seeking Opportunities 
-  For Federal Customers 
-  For Workers in Federal Buildings 
-  Overview
#### Jerry A. BURRIS, Petitioner, v. DURWIN DIVISION, R. P. Hewitt & Associates, and Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 43603.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 19, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Verizon Florida Inc.



EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Verizon Florida Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the
Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods presented in the Report.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Dated: November 12, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    LAWRENCE T. BABBIO,
JR.Lawrence T. Babbio, Jr. Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: November 12, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    John F. KillianJohn F. Killian Chief Financial Officer                                          



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Verizon Florida Inc. and will be retained by Verizon Florida Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                               Verizon North Inc.

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Six Months Ended
(Dollars in Millions)                                        June 30, 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                  <C>

Income before provision for income taxes                               $479.0
Equity in loss from affiliate                                             2.0
Interest expense                                                         52.4
Portion of rent expense representing interest                            15.3
Amortization of capitalized interest                                       .6
                                                            --------------------

Earnings, as adjusted                                                  $549.3
                                                            ====================

Fixed charges:
Interest expense                                                       $ 52.4
Portion of rent expense representing interest                            15.3
Capitalized interest                                                       .8
                                                            --------------------

Fixed Charges                                                          $ 68.5
                                                            ====================

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                       8.02
                                                            ====================
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31
                         Certification

I, Douglas O. Hart, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of the MBNA Master Credit
Card Trust II;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and based upon my
knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under that servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

Date:  September 22, 2005


/s/ Douglas O. Hart
Douglas O. Hart
Senior Executive Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            10,719
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                          36
<MORTGAGE>                                          67
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  11,538
<CASH>                                             876
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                             250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,428
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  11,638
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         14
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,428
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                796
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   8
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     336
<BENEFITS>                                           0
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                         60
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    150
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       101
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.24
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Bob POPE, Appellant, v. James L. STOUGH, Appellee.

No. 76-1651.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 20, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 27, 1978.

Michael D. Jones and Kenneth D. Morse, of Jones & Bishop, Altamonte Springs, for appellant.

Joseph L. Goldstein, of Mateer, Harbert, Bechtel & Phalin, P. A., Orlando, for appel-lee.

*1199PER CURIAM.

We have studied the briefs and record in this case and find no reversible error demonstrated by the points raised on appeal. Our review of the record indicates to us that appellant adduced evidence in support of his legal position and that the trial court on controverted evidence decided the issue against appellant.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.