alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF    2002**     The undersigned, Louis J. Rampino, the President and Chief    Executive Officer and Ronald J. Nicolas, Jr., the Senior    Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting    Officer and Treasurer of Fremont General Corporation (the    “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    § 1350, hereby certify that, to the best of our    knowledge:      (i)      the Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    for the period ended June 30, 2007 of the Company (the    “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934, except that the Report was not filed within the time    period required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and      (ii)     the financial statements and disclosures contained in the Report    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial    condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: October 8, 2007     /s/ LOUIS J. RAMPINO        Louis J. Rampino  *President and Chief Executive Officer*       Date: October 8, 2007     /s/ RONALD J. NICOLAS, JR.        Ronald J. Nicolas, Jr.  *Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Western Sierra Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Chaffee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 4, 2008

/s/ Michael M. ChaffeeMichael ChaffeeChief Executive Officer

1

---
# Official Journal C 24A/29 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 24A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5129 January 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 24A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5129 January 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | COMMISSIONDirectorate-General for Communication (DG COMM) |
| 2008/C 024A/01 | Call for expression of interest for a Head of Representation in Finland (Temporary agent — grade AD12) — COM/2008/10055 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

COMMISSIONDirectorate-General for Communication (DG COMM)

2008/C 024A/01

Call for expression of interest for a Head of Representation in Finland (Temporary agent — grade AD12) — COM/2008/10055

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# How GSA Helps Citizens and Consumers

## Accessibility    

                            - Accessible facility design
                            - Making technology accessible to all

More information on accessibility >>

## Appreciating government buildings    

                            - Fine Arts program
                            - Art in Architecture program
                            - Find historic buildings by architectural style
                            - Find historic buildings by timeline
                            - Find a historic building
                            - View historic buildings documentaries

## Child care    

                            - Find child care centers in GSA managed spaces
                            - Child care library
                            - Resources for parents

More information on child care >>

## Consumer information    

                            - USA.gov  - U.S. government’s official web portal
                            - 1-844-USA-GOV1 (872-4681)  - toll-free USA.gov Contact Center
                            - catalog.gpo.gov  - read, download, and order government consumer-related publications
                            - GobiernoUSA.gov  - consumer information in Spanish

## Government property for sale    

Property for disposal/sale

## How GSA helps the community    

                            - Environmental programs
                            - Urban Development/Good Neighbor program

## Security and emergency response    

                            - Code Adam alert
                            - Missing children
                            - Emergency management
                            - Disaster relief

Print PageEmail Page

Top
# October 2021
#### Joseph Francis DAWSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. Q-99.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 31, 1972.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender; and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

RAWLS, Judge.

Dawson appeals a judgment of convic tion and sentences of two counts of manslaughter and one count of driving while under the influence of alcoholic beverages. His primary contention is that a blood sample was taken from his body contrary to the provisions of F.S. § 322.261, F.S.A. The facts surrounding the extraction of blood from Dawson fall squarely within those detailed in the Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Mitchell, 245 So.2d 618 (Fla.1971), and thus this contention is without merit. Dawson also urges that a view of the scene by the jury was improperly conducted. This record discloses that the view was conducted under the careful supervision of the trial judge without any improper influences.

Finally, Dawson contends that the two 20-year and the one 6-month concurrent sentences are improper because only one transaction was involved. As to counts one and two of manslaughter, the words in the sentence of the Court reading “to run concurrently” are deleted; thus one sen*117tence of 20 years for these two counts shall stand. Stewart v. State, 184 So.2d 489 (4 Fla.App.1966). The concurrent sentence of 6 months imposed for driving while under the influence of alcoholic beverages resulted from a separate offense and therefore constitutes a proper sentence.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed; the sentences are amended as stated above. It is not necessary that appellant be returned for resentencing.

SPECTOR, C. J., and JOHNSON, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Secured Digital Applications, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Patrick Soon-Hock Lim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Patrick Soon-Hock Lim

Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
Chief Executive Officer

April 12, 2004
Exhibit 3.4


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
              TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                       SECURED DIGITAL APPLICATIONS, INC.

     Pursuant  to  the  provisions  of  Section  242  of  the  Delaware  General
Corporations Code, Secured Digital  Applications,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation
(the "Corporation"),  adopts the following articles of amendment to its articles
of incorporation:

     1. The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation
is hereby amended by replacing paragraph "(a)" in Article IV:

          (a)  Authorized  Capital  Stock.  The total  number of shares of stock
which the  Corporation  shall have authority to issue is  351,000,000  shares of
capital stock,  consisting of (i) 350,000,000  shares of common stock, par value
$0.00001 per share (the "Common  Stock") and (ii) 1,000,000  shares of preferred
stock, par value $0.10 per share (the "Preferred Stock").

     2. This  Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of  Incorporation  has
been duly adopted by the unanimous written consent of the Corporation's Board of
Directors and a majority of the  Corporation's  stockholders  in accordance with
the provisions of the Delaware  General  Corporations Law and the By-Laws of the
Corporation.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this  Certificate  of  Amendment  to the  Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation is caused to be signed by its Secretary of
the Board this 20th day of July, 2004.


                         SECURED DIGITAL APPLICATIONS, INC.


                          By:/s/ Valerie Hoi-Fah Looi
                          -----------------------------
                          Valerie Hoi-Fah Looi, Secretary
House Calendar No. 112

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 298

[Report No. 103–334]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reand for other purposes. gram, to establish a system of worker profiling, the emergency unemployment compensation pro- port to accompany the bill (H.R. 3167) to extend

NOVEMBER 8, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 112

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 298

[Report No. 103–334]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 3167) to extend the emergency unemployment compensation

program, to establish a system of worker profiling, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 8, 1993

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 3167) to extend the emergency

unemployment compensation program, to establish a system of worker profiling, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 3167) to extend the emergency un4 employment compensation program, to establish a system

5 of worker profiling, and for other purposes. All points of
2

HRES 298 RH

1 order against the conference report and against its consid2 eration are waived. The conference report shall be consid3 ered as read.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2447 

_____________________________

NAYMONTIE NASHARED ENOCH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

David P. Kreider, Judge.

December 18, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and B.L. THOMAS and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Kevin P. Steiger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham,

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30616

Conference Calendar

 

TOBY IHLI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STUART F. SAMSON, M.D.,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-2715

- - - - - - - - - -

June 17, 1998

Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Toby Ihli appeals the dismissal of his civil rights suit for

failure to state a claim. See Fed. R. App. P. 12(b)(6). He

argues that the district court did not apply the correct standard

under Rule 12(b)(6) and that there are conceivable sets of facts

under his claim which, if proved, would support a cause of action

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He also argues that the court erred by

dismissing the complaint with prejudice.

We have independently reviewed the arguments and the
No. 97-30616

-2-

appellate record. We conclude that the district court did not

err in its conclusion that Ihli failed to state a claim because

his allegations did not implicate the deprivation of a

constitutional right. See Lowrey v. Texas A & M Univ. Sys., 117

F.3d 242, 246-47 (5th Cir. 1997); Daniel v. Ferguson, 839 F.2d

1124, 1128 (5th Cir. 1988). Nor did the district court err in

dismissing the complaint with prejudice.

AFFIRMED.
# Official Journal C 11/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 11 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6411 January 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 11

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6411 January 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| 2021/C 11/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Research Executive Agency for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 1 | 1 |
| 2021/C 11/02 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 2 | 4 |
| 2021/C 11/03 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 2 | 8 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

2021/C 11/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Research Executive Agency for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 1

1

2021/C 11/02

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 2

4

2021/C 11/03

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 2

8

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigendum to the Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 1 ( OJ C 407, 26.11.2020 ) | 12 |

Corrigenda

Corrigendum to the Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 1 ( OJ C 407, 26.11.2020 )

( OJ C 407, 26.11.2020 )

12

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

s0830 

# Order

September 9, 2010

141090

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141090 COA: 295109 Wayne CC: 89-009530-FC ANDRE JAMES HAMPTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 30, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

D AVIS



### , J., not participating. I recuse myse lf and am not participating because I was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
# Real Estate Solutions

Looking for space to lease, build out, or considering new construction? Agencies can rely on GSA to deliver innovative office space and workspace solutions at best value - due to their extensive experience and knowledge of the local real estate market. **GSA is the largest property owner and manager of office and warehouse space in the Washington, DC area.**

Agencies can count on GSA's experts to suggest work space solutions through leasing, renovating or constructing new buildings where appropriate. Real estate services that GSA offers include:
                        - Space needs and requirement development
                        - Acquisition strategy and Market research
                        - Lease negotiations and agency client representation
                        - Development of Solicitations for Offers (SFOs)
                        - Space planning and interior design
                        - Renovations, build-outs, and new construction 
                        - Relocation services and move-in coordination
                        - Final walk-through and punch list repairs

Federal agencies can also obtain services such as child care, cafeterias and concessions, moving and transportation, and physical and building security in government-owned and leased buildings managed by GSA.

**Business opportunities**

GSA provides quality work space by partnering with the finest real estate, construction, brokerage and facilities management companies, A/E firms, and building owners. Working together, GSA, Federal agencies and industry partners collaborate to provide high quality work space solutions.

Visit work space business opportunities to find out how to join our growing portfolio of industry partners, view the projected forecast for work space related needs, or to lease office space to GSA.

Print PageEmail Page

Top

-  Region 11 | National Capital-  Overview 
-  About NCR 
-  Buildings and Facilities 
-  Products and Services    -  Child Care Services 
  -  Property Disposal 
  -  Property Management Services 
  -  Real Estate Solutions 
  -  Technology Partners 
  -  Workspace Partners 
  -  Emergency Management 
-  Region 11 Newsroom 
-  Small Business Opportunities 
-  GSA Celebrates CIS Groundbreaking 
-  PBS Commissioner Speaks at Bisnow Event
EXHIBIT
31.3



CERTIFICATION



I,
Frank F. Khulusi, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PCM, Inc.; and



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.



|Date:
    April 30, 2019 | /s/
    Frank F. Khulusi   
|------------------------ | ---------------------------
|                         | Frank
    F. Khulusi       
|                         | Chief
    Executive Officer
#### SAMUEL CROSSAN’S Adm’x. *vs.*SAMUEL GLASS, Adm’r of DAVID JUSTICE, deceased.

Judgment on an award in a case against an administrator, is a judgment of assets, and does not bind the defendant personally, unless assets be found, although there be no plea of piene administravit.

A judgment was rendered in this case on the award of a referee, in an action of assumpsit. The award did not find assets, and the judgment was entered generally, in a suit brought against the defendant as administrator, in which he pleaded the general issue, and thfre was no plea of piene administravit.

*1A*fi. fa. was issued against him as administrator, which the sh|rifflevied upon his own goods.

*Mr. Whitely*

now obtained a rule to show, cause why this levy should not be set aside.

*Mr. Wales,*

showed cause.—The action was brought against the *343defendant as administrator. He pleaded the general issue non-assumpsit, and did not plead that he had fully administered the estate. This was an admission of assets. The case was then referred to Judge Hall, who made award generally. There being no such plea of want of assets, the judgment is in effect a judgment de bonis propriis.

*Whitely,*for the rule.

*Wales,*contra.

Whitely.

—The award of the referee does not find assets, and the act of assembly says that the judgment against an executor or administrator on the report of referees, shall not be conclusive that he has assets, unless it be found by the report that he has assets. *(Dig.*225.) This judgment therefore, is one of assets, and the exe. cution properly follows it, and commands the sheriff to levy on the goods of the intestate in the hands of the administrator; but the sheriff has levied on the goods of the administrator.

*The Court*

set aside the levy. It might happen in case there are no assets, that by this levy the administrator would be compelled to pay the debt, without any means of remuneration.

Levy set aside.
Exhibit 4.2

LOGO



Exhibit 4.2

SPECIMEN

COMMON STOCK COMMON STOCK

NUMBER SHARES

CSR 0000 Coinstar

INCORPORATED UNDER THE CUSIP 19259P 30 0

LAWS OF
THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

This Certifies that

is the record holder of

FULLY PAID AND
NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF

COINSTAR, INC.

transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or duly authorized attorney on surrender of this certificate property
endorsed. This certificate shall not be valid countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.

WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the signature of its duly authorized officers.

COINSTAR, INC.

INCORPORATED

OCTOBER 12, 1993

DELAWARE

Dated:

SECRETARY CHAIR OF THE BOARD

COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:

MELLON INVESTOR
SERVICES LLC

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

BY

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

©NORTHERN BANK NOTE COMPANY



---

LOGO



COINSTAR, INC.

THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO SO REQUESTS A STATEMENT OF THE POWERS,
DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE, PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL, OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK OR SERIES THEREOF OF THE CORPORATION, AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR RIGHTS. SUCH
REQUESTS MAY BE MADE TO THE CORPORATION OR THE TRANSFER AGENT.

The following abbreviations, when used in the
inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM- as tenants in common

TEN ENT- as tenants
by the entireties

JTTEN- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common

COM PROP- as community property

UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- Custodian

(Cust) (Minor)

under Uniform Gifts to Minors

Act

(State)

UNIFTRF MIN ACT-

Custodian (until age)

(Cust)

under Uniform Transfers

(Minor)

to Minors Act

(State)

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.

For Value
Received,

hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)

Shares

of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint

Attorney to

transfer the-said stock on-the books of the within-named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated,

NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY
PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.

SIGNATURE GUARANTEED:

THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION, (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS
AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM) PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.