alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GEORGE B. EWART, d. b, appellant *vs.*STEPHEN W. MORRELL, p. b., respondent

A blacksmith’s day book is a book of original entries, though memorandums of the charges be first made upon a slate.

Appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, in an action of assumpsit.

The plaintiff offered in evidence his book of original entries to prove his account, which was for work done by him as a blacksmith, and on his voire dire stated that' the entries were usually made on a slate during the day, and transferred to this book by himself or by a clerk at night."

*Platt,*for plaintiff.

*Wales,*for defendant.

*Mr. Wales*

objected to this book going in evidence; and—

The court admitted it.

Verdict for plaintiff.
Exhibit 11                                      
                                     
                                      
                                      
               General DataComm Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                         Calculation of Loss per Share
                      (In thousands except per share data)
                                        
                                        
                                         Three months ended   Nine months ended 
                                              June 30,              June 30,   
                                            1997    1996          1997    1996
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary loss per share:                                 
                                        
 Weighted average number of common 
 shares outstanding                        21,148  20,797      21,063    20,656
 Assumed exercise of certain stock 
 options                                      -       -            -       - 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           21,148  20,797      21,063    20,656
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Net loss                                ($13,820)($7,767)   ($31,212) ($12,314)
 Payment of preferred stock dividends        (450)    -        (1,350)      - 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         ($14,270)($7,767)   ($32,562) ($12,314)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary loss per share                     ($0.67) ($0.37)    ($1.55)   ($0.60)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Primary loss per share:                                 
                                        
The fully-diluted loss per share calculation is identical to the calculation
presented above.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RICHARD G. SCHMIDT, M.D.

v.

STEVEN LEBOON AND CASSANDRA

LEBOON

PETITION OF: STEVEN LEBOON :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 156 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

RICHARD G. SCHMIDT, M.D.

v.

STEVEN LEBOON AND CASSANDRA

LEBOON

PETITION OF: CASSANDRA LEBOON :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 157 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of October, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1934

In re: JANE DOE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:22-cv-00947-PTG-JFA)

Submitted: December 20, 2022 Decided: December 22, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jane Doe, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1934 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jane Doe petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district 

court to grant her in forma pauperis status, leave to proceed under a pseudonym and under 

seal, leave to file electronically, leave to exceed page number requirements, and a 

temporary restraining order. We conclude that Doe is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown, 

LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when 

the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and “has no other adequate means to 

attain the relief [she] desires.” Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795 (cleaned up). 

Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 

503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by Doe is not available by way of 

mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1934 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
#### David Lee WILKINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11946.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Oct. 17, 1972.

*331James S. Gravel, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant.

Cook, Clark, Egan, Yancey & King, by Sidney E. Cook, Shreveport, for defendant-appellee.

Before AYRES, PRICE, and HALL, JJ.

AYRES, Judge.

Appellant having neither appeared nor filed a brief prior to the date fixed for the submission of this case, the appeal is considered abandoned and is.dismissed At appellant’s cost. Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule VII, Section 5(b), as revised on June 1, 1971; 8 LSA-R.S. 1971 P.P., pp. 33-34; 5 LSA-C.C.P. art. 2162; Dunnam v. Gipson, 262 So.2d 825 (La.App., 2d Cir. 1972); Fields v. City of Monroe, 265 So.2d 679 (La.App., 2d Cir. 1972).

Appeal dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - 32 CFR Part 206
          - [Docket ID: DOD-2017-OS-0055]
          - RIN 0790-AJ93

# AGENCY:

Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, DoD.

# ACTION:

Final rule.

# SUMMARY:

This final rule will remove DoD's regulation that relates to the administration of the Boren grants program as sections pertinent to the public were incorporated into the revision of DoD's regulation titled “National Security Education Program (NSEP) and NSEP Service Agreement” on December 5, 2016. This rule has been superseded, is unnecessary, and can be removed.

# DATES:

This rule is effective on June 27, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Sam Eisen at 571-256-0760.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

It has been determined that publication of this CFR part removal for public comment is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to public interest since its content was incorporated into another CFR part for which public comment was taken.

The removal of this part eliminates text which has been superseded at 32 CFR part 208, therefore, it will not change the regulatory impact on the public. This removal is administrative in nature and does not result in a burden reduction or cost savings to the public.

                    DoD internal guidance concerning the administration of the Boren grants program will continue to be published in DoD Instruction 1025.02 available at                     *http://www.esd.whs.mil/​Portals/​54/​Documents/​DD/​issuances/​dodi/​102502_​dodi_​2017.pdf.*

This rule is not significant under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review,” therefore, E.O. 13771, “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs” does not apply.

# List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 206

      - Colleges and universities
      - Grant programs—education

# PART 206—[REMOVED]

Accordingly, by the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 206 is removed.

Dated: June 21, 2018.

Aaron T. Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2018-13759 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
254 La. 778

#### Olan Ray STELL et al. v. L. V. CAYLOR, d/b/a Caylor and Associates.

No. 50002.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 8, 1969.

In re: Olan Ray Stell and Shirley Stell applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 223 So.2d 423.

Writ refused. The judgment is correct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


          <ARTICLE> UT
          <CIK> 0000065350
          <NAME> METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY
          <MULTIPLIER> 1,000
          <CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
                 
          <S>                              <C>        
          <PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
          <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997
          <PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1997
          <PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-1997
          <EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
          <BOOK-VALUE>                        PER-BOOK
          <TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          1,573,059
          <OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>          146,985
          <TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>               230,837
          <TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>             568,824
          <OTHER-ASSETS>                             0
          <TOTAL-ASSETS>                     2,519,705
          <COMMON>                              66,273
          <CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>            370,200
          <RETAINED-EARNINGS>                  294,381
          <TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>       730,854
          <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                100,000  <F1>
          <PREFERRED>                           12,056
          <LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                 563,253
          <SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                    35,290
          <LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                  0
          <COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>        33,252
          <LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>         40,020
          <PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                  0
          <CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              261
          <LEASES-CURRENT>                      27,050
          <OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>       977,669
          <TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      2,519,705
          <GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>            255,260
          <INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                  28,482
          <OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>           172,665
          <TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>           201,147
          <OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>               54,113
          <OTHER-INCOME-NET>                       497
          <INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>        54,610
          <TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>              14,925  <F2>
          <NET-INCOME>                          39,685
          <PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              121
          <EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>         39,564
          <COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              10,000  <F3>
          <TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>             45,160
          <CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                23,222
          <EPS-PRIMARY>                              0
          <EPS-DILUTED>                              0
          <FN>
          <F1> REPRESENTS COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE PREFERRED
          <F1> SECURITIES.
          <F2> INCLUDES DIVIDENDS ON COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
          <F2> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $2,250.
          <F3> REPRESENTS COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS PAID TO PARENT CORPORATION.
          </FN>
                  <PAGE>

</TABLE>
1

From:

Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 7:50 PM

To: RedHill

Subject: Protect our Water from Jet Fuel

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

I am writing to express my extreme concern for the quality of our drinking water threatened by the jet fuel leaking from

Navy storage tanks in Red Hill.  

Please ensure this jet fuel is completely cleaned up immediately. Twenty‐five years is too long to wait before acting to

save our most precious resource. If the leaks cannot be immediately fixed, then the tanks must be emptied.  

I also ask that the public comment period on the negotiated agreement between the U.S. Navy, Environmental

Protection Agency, and Hawaii Department of Health be extended to allow the public meaningful opportunity to

understand and weigh‐in on this important issue.  

Please continue to keep me informed in this decision‐making process.  

Thank you.
#### IRA S. BUSHEY *&*SONS, INC., Libelant-Appellant, v. DALZELLEADER, INC., Respondent-Appellee.

No. 193, Docket 27087.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 7, 1963.

Decided Jan. 21, 1963.

Foley & Martin, New York City (John H. Hanrahan and James S. Reardon, New York City, of counsel), for libel-ant-appellant.

Burlingham, Underwood, Barron, Wright & White, New York City (Stanley R. Wright and John S. Rogers, New York City, of counsel), for respondent-appellee.

Before CLARK, KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant had custody as bailee of the United States naval destroyer escort *Herbert C. Jones*at Gowanus Creek, New York Harbor, where the *Jones*was undergoing extensive overhaul. On February 25, 1958, appellee’s tugboats shifted the *Jones*out of drydock and towed her to a nearby pier. Appellant claims that in the course of this maneuver, appellee negligently towed the *Jones*over and against a rocky bottom, resulting in damage to her hull and propeller.

The burden of proof that damage to the *Jones*was sustained on February 25, 1958 was, of course, on the libelant. There was persuasive evidence that there was no rock or stony material under water in the area of the alleged accident against which the *Jones*could have scraped. The testimony of witnesses at the scene where the accident was supposed to have occurred was conflicting. Neither the pilot nor disinterested Naval personnel aboard the *Jones*felt any bumping or scraping. Of course, the trial judge could disbelieve the contrary assertions of appellant’s witnesses.

The conclusion of the trial court that the appellant had failed to show that the damage was sustained as alleged was not clearly erroneous, and must, accordingly, be affirmed. McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 20, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20 (1954); see Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Gold Standard, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the period ending January 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Amended Quarterly Report"), We, Scott L. Smith, President and director and
Bret C. Decker, Secretary of our Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Amended Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Amended Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

Dated: 6/30/05                           /s/Scott L. Smith
      --------------                     ---------------------------
                                         Scott L. Smith
                                         President and director


Dated: 6/30/05                           /s/Bret C. Decker
      --------------                     ---------------------------
                                         Bret C. Decker
                                         Secretary and director
# L_2007179EN.01S00301.xml

| 7.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 179/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 179/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

In view of the situation which has arisen following enlargement, some editions of the Official Journal of 27, 29 and 30 December 2006 have been published, in a simplified manner, in the official languages of that date.

It has been decided to republish, as corrigenda and in the Official Journal’s traditional presentation, Acts which appear in those Official Journals.

It is for this reason that Official Journals which contain only those corrigenda have been published in the pre-enlargement language versions. The translations of Acts in the languages of the new Member States will be published in a special edition of the Official Journal of the European Union comprising texts of the institutions and the European Central Bank adopted prior to 1 January 2007.

Official Journal of the European Union

Given below is a list of the Official Journals published on 27, 29 and 30 December 2006 and their corresponding corrigenda.

| OJ of 27 December 2006 | Corrected OJ (2007) |
| --- | --- |
| L 370 | L 30 |
| L 371 | L 45 |
| L 373 | L 121 |
| L 375 | L 70 |

OJ of 27 December 2006

Corrected OJ (2007)

L 370

L 30

L 371

L 45

L 373

L 121

L 375

L 70

| OJ of 29 December 2006 | Corrected OJ (2007) |
| --- | --- |
| L 387 | L 34 |

OJ of 29 December 2006

Corrected OJ (2007)

L 387

L 34

| OJ of 30 December 2006 | Corrected OJ (2007) |
| --- | --- |
| L 396 | L 136 |
| L 400 | L 54 |
| L 405 | L 29 |
| L 407 | L 44 |
| L 408 | L 47 |
| L 409 | L 36 |
| L 410 | L 40 |
| L 411 | L 27 |
| L 413 | L 50 |

OJ of 30 December 2006

Corrected OJ (2007)

L 396

L 136

L 400

L 54

L 405

L 29

L 407

L 44

L 408

L 47

L 409

L 36

L 410

L 40

L 411

L 27

L 413

L 50

---
<PAGE>   1





                                                                      EXHIBIT 15





July 2, 1997

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Dear Sirs:

We are aware that the May 18, 1997 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General
Host Corporation which includes our report dated June 11, 1997 (issued pursuant
to the provisions of Statements on Auditing Standards No. 71 and 42), is
incorporated by reference in its Registration Statement No. 33-50020 on Form
S-8 filed on July 27, 1992.  We are also aware of our responsibilities under
the Securities Act of 1933.


Yours very truly,

Price Waterhouse LLP
Detroit, Michigan
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      272
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                         24
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   295
<PP&E>                                           4,740
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              521
<BONDS>                                            792
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           525
<OTHER-SE>                                          51
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,381
<SALES>                                            750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   750
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  36
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    133
<INCOME-TAX>                                        57
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 76
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        76
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 3

PACIFIC HARBOUR CAPITAL LTD.(the "Company")

EXTRACT OF RESOLUTION

AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF THE COMPANY
AS EFFECTED ON JULY 28, 2005

Pursuant to section 42(2)(a)(iv) of the British Columbia Business Corporations Act, the following is an extract of resolutions of the shareholders of Pacific Harbour Capital Ltd. (the "Company") as passed on September 15, 2004, which extract is to be attached to the new Articles of the Company as effected on July 28, 2005.

"2.

the existing Articles of the Company be cancelled, and the form of Articles presented to the Meeting be adopted as the Articles of the Company in substitution for, and to the exclusion of, the existing Articles of the Company and the alterations made to the Companys Articles shall take effect upon deposit of this special resolution at the Companys records office after the Notice of Alteration referred to in Resolution 1 has been filed with the Registrar of Companies."