alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Second Stage Review.                    

*Date:*                         July 20, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Room 2W200, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ramesh Vemuri, Ph.D., Chief, Scientific Review Branch, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C-212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7700,                         *rv23r@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 28, 2018.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-14314 Filed 7-2-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### SOLOMON TOWNSEND *vs.*WILLIAM M. BONWILL and WILLIAM H. McBride.

In replevin, on a distress for rent arrear at a share rent, a witness who examined the crop to form an opinion as to quantity, may give that opinion in evidence.

Replevin on a taking as a distress for rent. Plea, riens in arrear.

The renting was for two-fifths the corn, and the sole question was, whether the full amount had been delivered. A witness who had examined the field for that purpose, was asked to give an estimate of the amount of corn raised ; and this testimony was objected to.

*Smithers,*for plaintiff.

*Comegys,*for defendant.

*The Court*

permitted it to go to the jury.

The plaintiff had a verdict.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                    Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



         I, Christopher M. Rasmussen, Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Accounting Officer), certify that this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
that the information contained herein fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Gateway Energy Corporation
and its subsidiaries for the periods presented.


Date:  May 11, 2007                         /s/  Christopher M. Rasmussen
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                 Christopher M. Rasmussen
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 (Principal Accounting Officer)
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 14

- 00316

- CR

STANLEY YARBOROUGH

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 12th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 23,744

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due on June 12, 2015. Appellant’s counsel was

appointed on June 30, 2015. Notwithstanding counsel’s representation that no

extensions to file the brief have been received, on July 10, 2015, the Court extended the

time to file appellant’s brief to August 10, 2015. Appellant is now requesting an

additional 90 day extension to file appellant’s br ief.

Appellant’s motion is granted in part. The time to file appellant’s brief is

extended to September 30, 2015.Yarborough v. State Page 2 PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted in part

Order issued and filed August 27, 2 015
#### AARON MARSHALL, d. b. *vs.*JOHN BURTON, p. b.

On certiorari, the court will not reverse a judgment for error in taxing costs; but will correct the record in this respect.

Certiorari to Justice William Russel.

There were three suits below by Burton *vs.*Marshall; the first for $12 50, on a bill for corn; the second for $4 13, on a due bill, and the third for $43 07, on account.

The defendant brought forward a book charge against the plaintiff, amounting to $36 00, with credits entered to the amount of $35 00. The first case was submitted, on the demand of the plaintiff, to referees, and the parties agreed that the referees should take into consideration all the matters in controversy, in all the three suits. The referees reported in favor of plaintiff for $3 00, and the justice entered judgment for that sum and for costs, amounting to $10 06.

*By the*Court.

These three claims might properly have been embraced in one suit, and the plaintiff could not split them properly. Yet he might waive a part of his claim. The suit for $12 50 might therefore have been maintained, without objection on this score; and the result of it any way would prevent a recovery in the other cases. If the defendant in this case had pleaded his set-off of $36, to that case, it would have decided that, and the objection of splitting a cause of action would have been fatal as to the other. But the parties agreed not only to refer the three cases, but that the referees, properly appointed in this case, might consider all matters in controversy between the parties, and the judgment was on a report regularly made for $3 00 debt and $10 06 costs. Among these costs arc $1 30, belonging to the other cases, which is error; but it will not do to reverse a judgment for error in taxing costs. We correct the amount of costs, and affirm the judgment.

Judgment affirmed; costs taxed at $8 76, instead of $10 06.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission gives notice that it has formally requested that the parties to the below listed agreements provide additional information pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 40304(d). This action prevents the agreements from becoming effective as originally scheduled. Interested parties may file comments within fifteen (15) days after publication of this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

*Agreement No.:*                     201143-017.                

*Title:*                     West Coast MTO Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     APM Terminals Pacific, Ltd.; Eagle Marine Services, Ltd.; Everport Terminal Services Inc.; International Transportation Service, Inc.; LBCT LLC; Pacific Maritime Services, L.L.C.; SSA Terminals (Pier A), LLC; SSA Terminals, LLC; Total Terminals International, LLC; TraPac Inc.; West Basin Container Terminal LLC; and Yusen Terminals LLC.                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: June 29, 2018.

Rachel E. Dickon,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-14417 Filed 7-3-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P
Exhibit 1.1

SANPAOLO IMI

ARTICLES AND BY-LAWS

SANPAOLO IMI S.p.A.A Company registered in the Register of Banks
Reporting Bank for Bank of Italy purposes of the SANPAOLO IMI Banking Group
registered in the Register of Banking Groups
Registered Office at Piazza San Carlo 156, Turin, Italy
Share capital of Euro 5,217,679,140.80 wholly paid up
Tax code, V.A.T. number and Turin Company Register 06210280019
Italian Banking Association code number 1025-6
Member of the Interbank Deposit Guarantee Fund

Registered
in the Turin Company Register on 2 December 2004

---



CONTENTS

|SECTION I    |  | CONSTITUTIONREGISTERED OFFICELIFE AND PURPOSE OF THE COMPANY |  | pag. 2 
|------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------
|SECTION II   |  | EQUITY CAPITAL AND SHARES                                      |  | pag. 3 
|SECTION III  |  | SHAREHOLDERS' MEETING                                          |  | pag. 4 
|SECTION IV   |  | DIRECTORS                                                      |  | pag. 6 
|SECTION V    |  | THE GENERAL MANAGER                                            |  | pag. 10
|SECTION VI   |  | BOARD OF STATUTORY AUDITORS AND ACCOUNTING CONTROL             |  | pag. 11
|SECTION VII  |  | LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND CORPORATE SEAL                        |  | pag. 14
|SECTION VIII |  | FINANCIAL RESULTS AND PROFITS                                  |  | pag. 14
|SECTION IX   |  | STATUTORY OFFICES                                              |  | pag. 15
|SECTION X    |  | RECESS                                                         |  | pag. 15
|SECTION XI   |  | WINDING UP                                                     |  | pag. 16

1

---



SECTION I  CONSTITUTIONREGISTERED OFFICELIFE AND PURPOSE OF THE COMPANY

ARTICLE 1

ARTICLE 2

ARTICLE 3

ARTICLE 4

ARTICLE 5

SECTION II  EQUITY CAPITAL AND SHARES

ARTICLE 6

2

---



ARTICLE 7

SECTION III  SHAREHOLDERS' MEETING

ARTICLE 8

3

---



ARTICLE 9

ARTICLE 10

ARTICLE 11

ARTICLE 12

ARTICLE 13

4

---



SECTION IV  DIRECTORS

ARTICLE 14

ARTICLE 15

5

---



ARTICLE 16

ARTICLE 17

6

---



ARTICLE 18

7

---



SECTION V  THE GENERAL MANAGER

ARTICLE 19

SECTION VI  BOARD OF STATUTORY AUDITORS AND ACCOUNTING CONTROL

ARTICLE 20

8

---





9

---





ARTICLE 21

SECTION VII  LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND CORPORATE SEAL

ARTICLE 22

10

---





SECTION VIII  FINANCIAL RESULTS AND PROFITS

ARTICLE 23

SECTION IX  STATUTORY OFFICES

ARTICLE 24

SECTION X  RECESS

ARTICLE 25

11

---



SECTION XI  WINDING UP

ARTICLE 26

12

---



QuickLinks
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00018

- CV

Steve McDaniel and Ginger

McDaniel

v.

Larry Miller, as judge of the

Municipal Court; Sherrill Johnson, as

Court Administrator; and Matthew

C.G. Boyle, as Town Attorney for the

Municipal Court of the Town of

Argyle, Texas §

§

§

§

§

§ From t he 16th District Court

o f Denton County ( 2012

- 10603

- 16 )

March 21 , 2013

P er C uriam



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the ap peal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdic tion.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM2 

## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00018

- CV

STEVE MCDANIEL AND G INGER

MCDANIEL APPELLANTS

V.

LARRY MILLER, AS JUD GE OF

THE MUNICIPAL COURT;

SHERRILL JOHNSON, AS COURT

ADMINISTRATOR; AND M ATTHEW

C.G. BOYLE, AS TOWN

A TTORNEY FOR THE MUNI CIPAL

COURT OF THE TOWN OF

ARGYLE, TEXAS APPELLEES

----------

FROM THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

----------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

----------

Appellants Steve McDaniel and Ginger McDaniel attempt to appeal from

an order gra nting a plea to the jurisdiction. The trial court granted the plea on

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

September 27, 2012, and Appellants filed a motion to reinstate on October 30,

2012; Appellants’ notice of appeal was therefore due December 26, 2012, but

was not filed until January 11, 2013. 2 See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(3). We

notified Appellants of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal

because the notice of appeal was not timely filed, and we informed them that the

appeal would be dismissed unless they , or any party desiring to continue the

appeal, filed with the court, on or before February 8, 2013, a response showing

grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received a res ponse.

Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; an d GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: March 21 , 2013

2 Appellants appear to have complied with rule of civil procedure 5 in filing

their motion to reinstate. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 5.
EASA AD Cancellation Notice No.: 2010-0083-CN

EASA Form 116 Page 1/2 

## EASA AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE CANCELLATION NOTICE AD No.: 2010-0083-CN

Date: 20 September 2010

Note: This Airworthiness Directive Cance llation Notice is issued by EASA, acting in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 on behalf of the European Community, its Member States and of the European third countri es that participate in the activities of EASA under Article 66 of that Regulation. 

### Type Approval Holder’s Name:
AIRBUS Type/Model designation(s):
A330 and A340-200/-300 aeroplanes TCDS Number: EASA.A.004, EASA.A.015 Foreign AD: Not applicable

Cancellation: This notice cancels EASA AD 2010-0083 dated 03 May 2010.



### ATA 28 Fuel – Fuel Pump Non-Return Valve (NRV) – Operational Test

Manufacturer(s): Airbus (f ormerly Airbus Industrie) Applicability: Airbus A330 aeroplanes, models - 201, -202, -203, -223, -243, -301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342 and -343, all manufacturer serial numbers. Airbus A340 aeroplanes, models -211, - 212, -213, -311, -312 and -313, all manufacturer serial numbers. Reason: It has been assessed that multiple NRV failures in combination with certain trapped fuel cases could pot entially increase the quantity of unusable fuel on the aeroplane, possibly leading to fuel starvation which could result in engines in-flight s hut down and would constitute an unsafe condition. To prevent and detect this condition, EASA issued EASA AD 2010-0083. Based on in service experience, main ly on the results of the operational test required by EASA AD 2010-0083, Airbus has performed a safety analysis on the NRV to check if the safety objectives are met. This analysis of the Collector Cell motive flow line NRV, taking into account all failure scenarios, concl udes that the previous non compliance can be alleviated. Consequently, no uns afe condition exists any more on the affected NRV. For the reasons described above, EASA AD 2010-0083 is cancelled. Effective Date: 20 September 2010EASA AD Cancellation Notice No.: 2010-0083-CN

EASA Form 116 Page 2/2 Compliance Not applicable
Ref. Publications: None Remarks: 1. Enquiries regarding this AD Cancellation Notice should be referred to the AD Focal Point - Airworthiness Directives, Safety Management & Research Section, Certification Directorate, EASA. E-mail: ADs@easa.europa.eu

. 2. For any questions concerning the technical content of this AD Cancellation Notice, please contact: AIRBUS SAS – Airworthiness Office – EAL. Fax: +33 5 61 93 45 80. E-mail: airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com

.
#### Buren S. WEBSTER et al., Petitioners, v. William H. HARMON, Respondent.

No. 40435.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 7, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 240 So.2d 69.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

DREW, J. (Retired), dissents.
# C_2020262EN.01002801.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/28

---

Action brought on 29 April 2020 — Moviescreens Rental v EUIPO — the airscreen company (AIRSCREEN)

(Case T-250/20)

(2020/C 262/38)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Moviescreens Rental GmbH (Damme, Germany) (represented by: D. Schulz and P. Stelzig, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG (Münster, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark AIRSCREEN — EU trade mark No 3 244 662

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 February 2020 in Case R 2527/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | amend the contested decision, in so far as in it, the Board of Appeal upheld the decision of the Cancellation Division, which had rejected the application for invalidity of the contested trade mark in relation to the goods at issue in the present case in
  Class 9 Inflatable motion picture screens; giant screens; silver screens
  Class 17 Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) frames fillable with air; flexible PVC surfaces
  Class 19 Transportable structures, not of metal; giant screen frames, not of metal; |
| --- | --- |

—

amend the contested decision, in so far as in it, the Board of Appeal upheld the decision of the Cancellation Division, which had rejected the application for invalidity of the contested trade mark in relation to the goods at issue in the present case in

Class 9 Inflatable motion picture screens; giant screens; silver screens

Class 17 Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) frames fillable with air; flexible PVC surfaces

Class 19 Transportable structures, not of metal; giant screen frames, not of metal;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) and Article 59(3), in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) and Article 59(3), in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) and Article 59(3), in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) and Article 59(3), in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# L_2004242EN.01S00301.xml

| 14.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 242/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 242/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

In view of the situation which has arisen following enlargement, some editions of the Official Journal of 30 April 2004 have been published, in a simplified manner, in the 11 official languages of that date.

It has been decided to republish, as corrigenda and in the Official Journal’s traditional presentation, Acts which appear in those Official Journals.

It is for this reason that Official Journals which contain only those corrigenda have been published in the 11 pre-enlargement language versions. The translations of Acts in the languages of the new Member States will be published in a special edition of the Official Journal of the European Union comprising texts of the institutions and the European Central Bank adopted prior to 1 May 2004.

Official Journal of the European Union

Given below is a list of the Official Journals published on 30 April and their corresponding corrigenda.

| OJ of 30 April 2004 | Corrected OJ |
| --- | --- |
| L 139 | L 226 of 25 June |
| L 144 | L 199 of 7 June |
| L 146 | L 225 of 25 June |
| L 149 | L 215 of 16 June |
| L 150 | L 185 of 24 May |
| L 151 | L 208 of 10 June |
| L 152 | L 216 of 16 June |
| L 153 | L 231 of 30 June |
| L 154 | L 189 of 27 May |
| L 155 | L 193 of 1 June |
| L 156 | L 202 of 7 June |
| L 157 | L 195 of 2 June |
| L 158 | L 229 of 29 June |
| L 159 | L 184 of 24 May |
| L 160 | L 212 of 12 June |
| L 161 | L 206 of 9 June |
| L 164 | L 220 of 21 June |
| L 165 | L 191 of 28 May |
| L 166 | L 200 of 7 June |
| L 167 | L 201 of 7 June |

OJ of 30 April 2004

Corrected OJ

L 139

L 226 of 25 June

L 144

L 199 of 7 June

L 146

L 225 of 25 June

L 149

L 215 of 16 June

L 150

L 185 of 24 May

L 151

L 208 of 10 June

L 152

L 216 of 16 June

L 153

L 231 of 30 June

L 154

L 189 of 27 May

L 155

L 193 of 1 June

L 156

L 202 of 7 June

L 157

L 195 of 2 June

L 158

L 229 of 29 June

L 159

L 184 of 24 May

L 160

L 212 of 12 June

L 161

L 206 of 9 June

L 164

L 220 of 21 June

L 165

L 191 of 28 May

L 166

L 200 of 7 June

L 167

L 201 of 7 June

---