**FORM A -1** 

**PA RENT COMPA**  **NY INFORMA TION** 
**I. Parent Company / Legal Corporate Owner Information**
1. Legal Parent Company/ Legal Corporate Name Johns Manville 2. Address 717 17th Street 3. City Denver 4. State CO 5. Zip Code 80217 6. County Denver
7. Size of Company (approximate number of employ ees including all subsidiaries, branches, and related establishments owned): 6,491 (end of 2009)



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM A -2** 

**FA CILITY INFORMA** 

**TION**
**II. Facility Information** Facility 1
Facility Name Johns Manville Plant 8 Facility Address Street 925 Carpenter Rd. City Defiance State Ohio Zip Code 43512 County Defiance County Facility Coordinates Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 41.302732 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.340206 Specific location represented (e.g., front door of main building, centroid of property , etc.) Centroid of property
Number of employees attached to the wool fiberglass manufacturing facility : See CBI Subm ittal
Design capacity

of the plant (tons/y r) See CBI Subm ittal

Ty pe(s) of process(es) (rotary spin, flame attenuation) at this plant Glass melting furnaces, rotary spin manufacturing line, and flame attenuation m anufacturing line
Operation schedule hrs/day 24 days/y r 365
Identify what state and local air pollution rules and regulations, including permit requirements, your plant is subject to. (Please provide copies of permit(s) and permit IDs) Ohio EPA Facility ID: 0320010005 Title V permit P0086884 (See attachment A)

**III. Technical Contact**

Name James Smargiassi Technical Contact Title Environm ental Manager Telephone (419) 784-7963 Facsimile (Fax) (419) 784-7995



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsEmail 

### smargiassij@jm.com

**IV. Other**
Is the facility

a major source of HAP? Yes
If No, did the facility take a limit of its potential HAP emissions to avoid classification as a major source: NA
Does the facility

manufacture other products in addition to wool fiberglass? No
If Yes, list the other products manufactured at the facility

. NA

Are there any

HAP em issions associated with any co-located facilities? List unit operations, e.g., boiler, and pollutant/emissions. Process W ater Settling Pond - phenol, methanol, formaldehyde RICE Emergency

Generators - formaldehyde, benzene, acrolein, xy lene Natural Gas Boilers (< 10.0mmbtu/hr) - mercury , dioxin, hydrogen chloride, lead QC Test Ovens - phenol, methanol, formaldehyde Resin Tanks - phenol, methanol, formaldehyde Solvent Parts W ashers - benzene, toluene



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM A -2** 

**FA CILITY INFORMA** 

**TION**
**II. Facility Information**
Facility Name Facility Address Street City State Zip Code County Facility Coordinates Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Specific location represented (e.g., front door of main building, centroid of property , etc.)
Number of employees attached to the wool fiberglass manufacturing facility : Design capacity

of the plant (tons/y r)

Ty pe(s) of process(es) (rotary spin, flame attenuation) at this plant
Operation schedule hrs/day days/y r Identify what state and local air pollution rules and regulations, including permit requirements, your plant is subject to. (Please provide copies of permit(s) and permit IDs)

**III. Technical Contact**

Name Technical Contact Title Telephone Facsimile (Fax) Facility 2

Johns Manville Plant 2
408 Perry

St. Defiance Ohio 43512 Defiance County

41.285796 -84.364979
Centroid of property

See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal

Glass melting furnaces and flame attenuation manufacturing line

24 365

Ohio EPA Facility

ID: 0320010005 Title V permit P0086884 (See attachment A)

James Smargiassi Environm ental Manager (419) 784-7963 (419) 784-7995



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsEmail

**IV. Other**
Is the facility

a major source of HAP?
If No, did the facility take a limit of its potential HAP emissions to avoid classification as a major source:
Does the facility

manufacture other products in addition to wool fiberglass?
If Yes, list the other products manufactured at the facility

.

Are there any

HAP em issions associated with any co-located facilities? List unit operations, e.g., boiler, and pollutant/emissions. 

### smargiassij@jm.com

Yes

NA

No

NA

RICE Emergency

Generators - formaldehyde, benzene, acrolein, xy lene Natural Gas Boilers (< 10.0mmbtu/hr) - mercury , dioxin, hydrogen chloride, lead QC Test Ovens - phenol, methanol, formaldehyde Resin Tanks - phenol, methanol, formaldehyde Solvent Parts W ashers - benzene, toluene



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown). 19
For each process line: Process Line 81 Process line identification names or numbers Line 81
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) flame attenuation Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) See CBI Subm ittal Age of process equipment (y rs) 51 Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product See CBI Subm ittal

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Not available



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 82 Process Line 84 Line 82 Line 84

flame attenuation flame attenuation See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal 50 47 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

Not available Not available



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 86 Line 86

flame attenuation See CBI Subm ittal 30 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal

Not available



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 87 Line 87

flame attenuation See CBI Subm ittal 2 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal

Not available



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 88 Line 88

flame attenuation See CBI Subm ittal 36 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal

Not available



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 89 Line 89
rotary spin See CBI Subm ittal 15 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 800 Line 800
rotary spin See CBI Subm ittal 5 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal

Not available



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 801 Line 801
rotary spin See CBI Subm ittal 5 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 802 Line 802
rotary spin See CBI Subm ittal 5 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 803 Line 803
rotary spin See CBI Subm ittal 5 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 804 Line 804
rotary spin See CBI Subm ittal 5 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 805 Line 805
rotary spin See CBI Subm ittal 5 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 806 Line 806
rotary spin See CBI Subm ittal 5 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 807 Process Line 21 Line 807 Line 21
rotary spin flame attenuation See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal 5 51 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal Not available



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 23 Line 23

flame attenuation See CBI Subm ittal 54 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal

Not available



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 24 Line 24

flame attenuation See CBI Subm ittal 57 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal

Not available



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-1**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**I. Overview of Plant Operations**
Number of process lines. Include lines that are currently operational or that are temporarily shutdown. (Do not include lines permanently shutdown).
For each process line: Process line identification names or numbers
Ty pe of process line (e.g., rotary spin, flame attenuation) Maximum annual production rate (tons/y r) Age of process equipment (y rs) Remaining economic life of process line (y rs) List of products produced and most recent annual production (tons/y r; specify year) for each product

Please attach detailed schematics of each process line. Process Line 25 Line 25

flame attenuation See CBI Subm ittal 56 Indefinite (due to rebuild capabilities) See CBI Subm ittal

Not available



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-2**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**II. Process - Raw materials Handling and Storage**
Molten glass preparation Raw m aterials and proportions by wt (%) See CBI Subm ittal

Method(s) of convey ing each raw material to furnace/pots Silos and calibrated weigh scales, sent to mix by enclosed conveyors with bin vents and dust collectors. Binder and Additives List each raw material, including premixed materials, in the binder formulation and its proportion by wt (%) See CBI Subm ittal List steps in preparing binder, including storage temperature (° F) and holding tim e (hrs) See CBI Subm ittal Total yearly

consumption of binder (gal/y r) See CBI Subm ittal Cost of binder ($/gal) for most recent year (specify year) See CBI Subm ittal
Are binder storage and mixing tanks vented to outside/inside? Resin tanks and pre-react tanks vented outside



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls Method of treating vent air from storage and mix tanks Lines 800-807 have formaline neutralizing filter. Storage tanks for line 81 - 88 and 23 - 25 are equipped with potassium permanganate filters. Emission control during liquid raw material transfer from vehicles to storage tanks. Pressurized unloading with storage tanks vented to atmosphere. Describe future source reduction plans and schedules to reformulate binders; List each constituent, proportions wt (%), cost ($/gal) for reformulation See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-3**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**III. Process - Glass Melting Furnace**
For each Glass Melting Furnace: Furnace 2601 Furnace 2603 Melter 89 Process unit identification name/number Furnace 2601 Furnace 2603 Melter 89 (3 Melters)
Process line(s) served (identification name/number) 81,82,84,86,87,88,21, 23,24,25 81,82,84,86,87,88,21, 23,24,25 89 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 41.285236 41.285339 41.303383 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.364872 -84.365119 -84.340764 Stack or vent height (units) 75ft 75ft 70ft Stack or vent diameter (units) 5 ft 5 ft 3.83 ft Manufacturer and model JM Proprietary JM Proprietary JM Proprietary Date of original installation 1/1/1960 1/1/1960 11/1/1995

Estimate of remaining lifetime (y rs) Indefinite (due to continued
ma intenance) Indefinite (due to continued
ma intenance) Indefinite (due to continued
ma intenance) Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild JM is not familiar with the term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar with the term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar with the term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. Frequency

of a major rebuild NA NA NA Cost of ty pical major rebuild NA NA NA Date of last major rebuild NA NA NA Purpose of last major rebuild NA NA NA Increase or decrease in emissions NA NA NA
Fuel ty pe: electric, gas, or oil gas-fired gas-fired gas-fired (forhearth), electric (melter) Fuel consumption rate (KW /ton of glass or Btu/ton of glass) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal
List HAPs that are in refractory material Chromium Compounds Chromium Compounds Chromium Compounds Design production rate (tons/day) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Actual glass pull rate (tons/day) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Vent gas flow rate (acfm @ ° F) 75,000 @ 310 75,000 @ 310 25,000 @ 130 Temperature (° F) of molten glass in furnace and forehearth (if applicable) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce
em issions None See CBI Subm ittal None Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-3**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**III. Process - Glass Melting Furnace**
For each Glass Melting Furnace: Process unit identification name/number
Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Manufacturer and model Date of original installation

Estimate of remaining lifetime (y rs) Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild Cost of ty pical major rebuild Date of last major rebuild Purpose of last major rebuild Increase or decrease in emissions
Fuel ty pe: electric, gas, or oil Fuel consumption rate (KW /ton of glass or Btu/ton of glass)
List HAPs that are in refractory material Design production rate (tons/day) Actual glass pull rate (tons/day) Vent gas flow rate (acfm @ ° F) Temperature (° F) of molten glass in furnace and forehearth (if applicable) Melter 100 Melter 200 Furnace 300 M100 M200 M300

801,802,800 803,804,800 805,806,807,800 41.306152 41.306152 41.306152 -84.338994 -84.338994 -84.338994 50ft 50ft 50ft 1.27 ft 1.27 ft 1.27 ft JM Proprietary JM Proprietary JM Proprietary

3/1/2007 1/1/2007 11/1/2006 Indefinite (due to continued
ma intenance) Indefinite (due to continued
ma intenance) Indefinite (due to continued
ma intenance)

JM is not familiar with the term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar with the term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar with the term "major rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA electric gas-fired (startup) electric gas-fired (startup) electric gas-fired (startup) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Chromium Compounds Chromium Compounds Chromium Compounds See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal 2,960 @ 200 2,960 @ 200 2,960 @ 200

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce
em issions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

None None None See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-4**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**IV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame A ttenuation** 

For each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame Attenuation Process Line 81 Process Line 82 Process unit identification name/number Unit 81 Hot End Unit 82 Hot End Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Line 81 Line 82 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 41.303025/41.303252 See tab C-9 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.339297/-84.339375 See tab C-9
Stack or vent height (units) 38 ft See tab C-9
Stack or vent diameter (units) 5x6ft rectangle (both stacks) See tab C-9 Number of fiber forming devices (spinners) per line. See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Method of attenuating fiber (e.g., air, flame, or air and flame). Indicate ty pe of burner used (if flame). flame attenuation, gas burner flame attenuation, gas burner Is there a forehearth between the furnace and the forming section? no no Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. Frequency

of a major rebuild NA NA Cost of ty pical major rebuild NA NA Date of last major rebuild NA NA Purpose of last major rebuild NA NA Increase or decrease in emissions NA NA If modular, number of modules and plenums NA NA Presence of water overspray and application rate (gpm) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Binder applied and application rate (gpm) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Other material applied and application rate (gpm) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Temperature of glass fiber when binder is applied (°F) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Temperature of binder when applied to fibers (°F) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Method of evenly

distributing fibers onto forming converyor See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Formed mat thickness (in.) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Forming air flow rate (acfm @ °F) 100,000acfm @ 180F 100,000acfm @ 110F
Percent of forming air recirculated and percent exhausted 0% recirculated 100% exhausted 0% recirculated 100% exhausted



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce
em issions See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-4**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**IV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame A ttenuation** 

For each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame Attenuation Process unit identification name/number Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)
Stack or vent height (units)
Stack or vent diameter (units) Number of fiber forming devices (spinners) per line. Method of attenuating fiber (e.g., air, flame, or air and flame). Indicate ty pe of burner used (if flame). Is there a forehearth between the furnace and the forming section? Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild Cost of ty pical major rebuild Date of last major rebuild Purpose of last major rebuild Increase or decrease in emissions If modular, number of modules and plenums Presence of water overspray and application rate (gpm) Binder applied and application rate (gpm) Other material applied and application rate (gpm) Temperature of glass fiber when binder is applied (°F) Temperature of binder when applied to fibers (°F) Method of evenly

distributing fibers onto forming converyor Formed mat thickness (in.) Forming air flow rate (acfm @ °F)
Percent of forming air recirculated and percent exhausted Process Line 84 Process Line 86 Unit 84 Hot End Unit 86 Hot End Line 84 Line 86 41.303337/41.303347 41.303325/41.303327 -84.339716/-84.339078 -84.339933/-84.340005

35 ft 40 ft
5x6ft rectangle (both stacks) East: 5 ft square We st: 5 ft square See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal
flame attenuation, gas burner flame attenuation, gas burner

no no

JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal 100,000acfm @ 140F 80,000acfm @ 130F 0% recirculated 100% exhausted 0% recirculated 100% exhausted



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce
em issions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-4**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**IV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame A ttenuation** 

For each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame Attenuation Process unit identification name/number Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)
Stack or vent height (units)
Stack or vent diameter (units) Number of fiber forming devices (spinners) per line. Method of attenuating fiber (e.g., air, flame, or air and flame). Indicate ty pe of burner used (if flame). Is there a forehearth between the furnace and the forming section? Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild Cost of ty pical major rebuild Date of last major rebuild Purpose of last major rebuild Increase or decrease in emissions If modular, number of modules and plenums Presence of water overspray and application rate (gpm) Binder applied and application rate (gpm) Other material applied and application rate (gpm) Temperature of glass fiber when binder is applied (°F) Temperature of binder when applied to fibers (°F) Method of evenly

distributing fibers onto forming converyor Formed mat thickness (in.) Forming air flow rate (acfm @ °F)
Percent of forming air recirculated and percent exhausted Process Line 87 Process Line 88 Unit 87 Hot End Unit 88 Hot End Line 87 Line 88 41.303166 41.303391/41.303395 -84.340118 -84.340263/-84.340327

48 ft 40 ft

7 ft x 5 ft Rect. 6 ft x 6 ft Square (both stacks) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal
flame attenuation, gas burner flame attenuation, gas burner

no no

JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal 100,000acfm @ 120F 120,000acfm @ 130F 0% recirculated 100% exhausted 0% recirculated 100% exhausted



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce
em issions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-4**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**IV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame A ttenuation** 

For each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame Attenuation Process unit identification name/number Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)
Stack or vent height (units)
Stack or vent diameter (units) Number of fiber forming devices (spinners) per line. Method of attenuating fiber (e.g., air, flame, or air and flame). Indicate ty pe of burner used (if flame). Is there a forehearth between the furnace and the forming section? Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild Cost of ty pical major rebuild Date of last major rebuild Purpose of last major rebuild Increase or decrease in emissions If modular, number of modules and plenums Presence of water overspray and application rate (gpm) Binder applied and application rate (gpm) Other material applied and application rate (gpm) Temperature of glass fiber when binder is applied (°F) Temperature of binder when applied to fibers (°F) Method of evenly

distributing fibers onto forming converyor Formed mat thickness (in.) Forming air flow rate (acfm @ °F)
Percent of forming air recirculated and percent exhausted Process Line 89 Process Line 801 Unit 89 Hot End Fiberizer #801 Line 89 Line 801 41.303383 41.306196 -84.340764 -84.338608

70ft 51.6 ft

46in 5 ft See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal rotary disc natural gas/air rotary disc & flame attenuation natural gas/air

Yes Yes

JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. NA N/A NA N/A NA N/A NA N/A NA N/A 3 NA See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal 157,500acfm @ 85F 23,000acfm @ 85 F 0% recirculated 100% exhausted 0% recirculated 100% exhausted



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce
em issions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-4**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**IV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame A ttenuation** 

For each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame Attenuation Process unit identification name/number Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)
Stack or vent height (units)
Stack or vent diameter (units) Number of fiber forming devices (spinners) per line. Method of attenuating fiber (e.g., air, flame, or air and flame). Indicate ty pe of burner used (if flame). Is there a forehearth between the furnace and the forming section? Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild Cost of ty pical major rebuild Date of last major rebuild Purpose of last major rebuild Increase or decrease in emissions If modular, number of modules and plenums Presence of water overspray and application rate (gpm) Binder applied and application rate (gpm) Other material applied and application rate (gpm) Temperature of glass fiber when binder is applied (°F) Temperature of binder when applied to fibers (°F) Method of evenly

distributing fibers onto forming converyor Formed mat thickness (in.) Forming air flow rate (acfm @ °F)
Percent of forming air recirculated and percent exhausted Process Line 802 Process Line 803 Fiberizer #802 Fiberizer #803 Line 802 Line 803 41.306196 41.306196 -84.338731 -84.338828

51.6 ft 51.6 ft

5 ft 5 ft See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal rotary disc & flame attenuation natural gas/air rotary disc & flame attenuation natural gas/air

Yes Yes

JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NA NA See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal 23,000acfm @ 85 F 23,000acfm @ 85 F 0% recirculated 100% exhausted 0% recirculated 100% exhausted



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce
em issions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-4**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**IV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame A ttenuation** 

For each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame Attenuation Process unit identification name/number Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)
Stack or vent height (units)
Stack or vent diameter (units) Number of fiber forming devices (spinners) per line. Method of attenuating fiber (e.g., air, flame, or air and flame). Indicate ty pe of burner used (if flame). Is there a forehearth between the furnace and the forming section? Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild Cost of ty pical major rebuild Date of last major rebuild Purpose of last major rebuild Increase or decrease in emissions If modular, number of modules and plenums Presence of water overspray and application rate (gpm) Binder applied and application rate (gpm) Other material applied and application rate (gpm) Temperature of glass fiber when binder is applied (°F) Temperature of binder when applied to fibers (°F) Method of evenly

distributing fibers onto forming converyor Formed mat thickness (in.) Forming air flow rate (acfm @ °F)
Percent of forming air recirculated and percent exhausted Process Line 804 Process Line 805 Fiberizer #804 Fiberizer #805 Line 804 Line 805 41.306196 41.306196 -84.338932 -84.339042

51.6 ft 51.6 ft

5 ft 5 ft See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal rotary disc & flame attenuation natural gas/air rotary disc & flame attenuation natural gas/air

Yes Yes

JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NA NA See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal 23,000acfm @ 85 F 23,000acfm @ 85 F 0% recirculated 100% exhausted 0% recirculated 100% exhausted



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce
em issions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-4**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**IV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame A ttenuation** 

For each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame Attenuation Process unit identification name/number Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)
Stack or vent height (units)
Stack or vent diameter (units) Number of fiber forming devices (spinners) per line. Method of attenuating fiber (e.g., air, flame, or air and flame). Indicate ty pe of burner used (if flame). Is there a forehearth between the furnace and the forming section? Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild Cost of ty pical major rebuild Date of last major rebuild Purpose of last major rebuild Increase or decrease in emissions If modular, number of modules and plenums Presence of water overspray and application rate (gpm) Binder applied and application rate (gpm) Other material applied and application rate (gpm) Temperature of glass fiber when binder is applied (°F) Temperature of binder when applied to fibers (°F) Method of evenly

distributing fibers onto forming converyor Formed mat thickness (in.) Forming air flow rate (acfm @ °F)
Percent of forming air recirculated and percent exhausted Process Line 806 Process Line 807 Fiberizer #806 Fiberizer #807 Line 806 Line 807 41.306196 41.306196 -84.339155 -84.339227

51.6 ft 51.6 ft

5 ft 5 ft See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal rotary disc & flame attenuation natural gas/air rotary disc & flame attenuation natural gas/air

Yes Yes

JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NA NA See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal 23,000acfm @ 85 F 23,000acfm @ 85 F 0% recirculated 100% exhausted 0% recirculated 100% exhausted



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce
em issions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-4**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**IV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame A ttenuation** 

For each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame Attenuation Process unit identification name/number Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)
Stack or vent height (units)
Stack or vent diameter (units) Number of fiber forming devices (spinners) per line. Method of attenuating fiber (e.g., air, flame, or air and flame). Indicate ty pe of burner used (if flame). Is there a forehearth between the furnace and the forming section? Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild Cost of ty pical major rebuild Date of last major rebuild Purpose of last major rebuild Increase or decrease in emissions If modular, number of modules and plenums Presence of water overspray and application rate (gpm) Binder applied and application rate (gpm) Other material applied and application rate (gpm) Temperature of glass fiber when binder is applied (°F) Temperature of binder when applied to fibers (°F) Method of evenly

distributing fibers onto forming converyor Formed mat thickness (in.) Forming air flow rate (acfm @ °F)
Percent of forming air recirculated and percent exhausted Process Line 21 Process Line 23 Unit 21 hot end Unit 23 Hot End Line 21 Line 23 41.286357/41.286332 41.286260/41.286226 -84.365001/-84.365041 -84.365097/-84.365073 E1: 47.0 ft E2: 43.0 ft E4: 40.0 ft E5: 40.0 ft E1: 2.38 ft square E2: 5.64 ft square E4: 2.12 ft square E5: 2.12 ft square See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal
flame attenuation, gas burner flame attenuation, gas burner

no no

JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal 80,000acfm @ 125F 65,000acfm @ 175F 0% recirculated 100% exhausted 0% recirculated 100% exhausted



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce
em issions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-4**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**IV. Process - Forming -- Rotary Spin / Flame A ttenuation** 

For each Forming Operation -- Rotary Spin/Flame Attenuation Process unit identification name/number Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places)
Stack or vent height (units)
Stack or vent diameter (units) Number of fiber forming devices (spinners) per line. Method of attenuating fiber (e.g., air, flame, or air and flame). Indicate ty pe of burner used (if flame). Is there a forehearth between the furnace and the forming section? Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild Cost of ty pical major rebuild Date of last major rebuild Purpose of last major rebuild Increase or decrease in emissions If modular, number of modules and plenums Presence of water overspray and application rate (gpm) Binder applied and application rate (gpm) Other material applied and application rate (gpm) Temperature of glass fiber when binder is applied (°F) Temperature of binder when applied to fibers (°F) Method of evenly

distributing fibers onto forming converyor Formed mat thickness (in.) Forming air flow rate (acfm @ °F)
Percent of forming air recirculated and percent exhausted Process Line 24 Process Line 25 Unit 24 Hot End Unit 25 Hot End Line 24 Line 25 41.286183/41.286151 41.286127/41.286095 -84.365132/-84.365116 -84.365159/-84.365170 E6: 40.0 ft E7: 40.0 ft E8: 40.0 ft E9: 40.0 ft E6: 2.12 ft square E7: 2.12 ft square E8: 2.12 ft square E9: 2.12 ft square See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal
flame attenuation, gas burner flame attenuation, gas burner

no no

JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine maintenace. NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal 85,000acfm @ 175F 70,000acfm @ 150 0% recirculated 100% exhausted 0% recirculated 100% exhausted



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce
em issions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-5**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**V. Process - Curing**

For each Curing Oven: Curing Oven 81 Curing Oven 82 Curing Oven 86 Curing Oven 87 Process unit identification name/number P043 P044 P029 P093

Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Line 81 Line 82 Line 86 Line 87 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 41.303411 41.303411 41.303411 41.303436 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.339496 -84.339496 -84.339496 -84.340107 Stack or vent height (units) 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft Stack or vent diameter (units) 46" Square 46" Square 46" Square 46" Square Method of curing thermal thermal thermal thermal Manufacturer and model JM Custom JM Custom JM Custom JM Custom Date of original installation 6/1/1959 6/1/1960 6/1/1990 6/1/1954 Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar

with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar

with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar

with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. Frequency

of a major rebuild NA NA NA NA Cost of ty pical major rebuild NA NA NA NA Date of last major rebuild NA NA NA NA Purpose of last major rebuild NA NA NA NA Increase or decrease in emissions NA NA NA NA Fuel ty pe: electric, gas, or oil natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas
Fuel consumption rate (KW /hr or BTU/hr) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Moisture content wt (%) of formed mat:

inlet See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal outlet <1% <1% <1% <1% Air flow rate (acfm @ ° F) from curing 64,000 @ 105 65,000 @ 105 60,000 @ 85 17,000 @ 100 Exhaust air temperature (° F) 105 105 85 100
Residence time of product (mins) See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Binder content of cured product (LOI) 6-22.5% 6-22.5% 6-22.5% 6-22.5%



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive
ma intenance procedures See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce emissions See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-5**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**V. Process - Curing**

For each Curing Oven: Process unit identification name/number

Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Method of curing Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild Cost of ty pical major rebuild Date of last major rebuild Purpose of last major rebuild Increase or decrease in emissions Fuel ty pe: electric, gas, or oil
Fuel consumption rate (KW /hr or BTU/hr) Moisture content wt (%) of formed mat:

inlet outlet Air flow rate (acfm @ ° F) from curing Exhaust air temperature (° F)
Residence time of product (mins) Binder content of cured product (LOI) Curing Oven 89 Curing Oven 800 Curing Oven 801 Curing Oven 802 P051 P085 P065 P068

Line 89 Lines 801, 802,

803, 804, 805, 806, and 807. Line 801 Line 802 41.304026 41.305904 41.305823 41.305823 -84.340593 -84.338447 -84.338608 -84.338731 50ft 44 ft 44 ft 44 ft 4' round 1.75' round 1.75' round 1.75' round thermal thermal thermal thermal JM Custom JM Custom JM Custom JM Custom

11/1/1995 2/1/2007 7/1/2007 5/1/2007

JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar

with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar

with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar

with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal <1% <1% <1% <1% 17,000 @ 440 5,000 @ 150 2,000 @ 230 1,500 @ 200

440 150 230 200

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal 5-16% 5-7% 5-7% 5-7%



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive
ma intenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce emissions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-5**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**V. Process - Curing**

For each Curing Oven: Process unit identification name/number

Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Method of curing Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild Cost of ty pical major rebuild Date of last major rebuild Purpose of last major rebuild Increase or decrease in emissions Fuel ty pe: electric, gas, or oil
Fuel consumption rate (KW /hr or BTU/hr) Moisture content wt (%) of formed mat:

inlet outlet Air flow rate (acfm @ ° F) from curing Exhaust air temperature (° F)
Residence time of product (mins) Binder content of cured product (LOI) Curing Oven 803 Curing Oven 804 Curing Oven 805 Curing Oven 806 P071 P074 P077 P080

Line 803 Line 804 Line 805 Line 806 41.305823 41.305823 41.305823 41.305823 -84.338828 -84.338932 -84.339042 -84.339155 44 ft 44 ft 44 ft 44 ft 1.75' round 1.75' round 1.75' round 1.75' round thermal thermal thermal thermal JM Custom JM Custom JM Custom JM Custom

3/1/2007 11/1/2006 12/1/2006 8/1/2006

JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar

with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar

with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar

with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal <1% <1% <1% <1% 2,200 @ 185 1,530 @ 200 3,300 @ 220 2,000 @ 270

185 200 220 270

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal 5-7% 5-7% 5-7% 5-7%



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive
ma intenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce emissions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-5**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**V. Process - Curing**

For each Curing Oven: Process unit identification name/number

Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Method of curing Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild Cost of ty pical major rebuild Date of last major rebuild Purpose of last major rebuild Increase or decrease in emissions Fuel ty pe: electric, gas, or oil
Fuel consumption rate (KW /hr or BTU/hr) Moisture content wt (%) of formed mat:

inlet outlet Air flow rate (acfm @ ° F) from curing Exhaust air temperature (° F)
Residence time of product (mins) Binder content of cured product (LOI) Curing Oven 807 Curing Oven 21 Curing Oven 23 Curing Oven 24 P083 P325 P316 P317

Line 807 Line 21 Line 23 Line 24 41.305823 41.286296 41.286228 41.286165 -84.339227 -84.364896 -84.365009 -84.365052 44 ft 40 ft 40 ft 40 ft 1.75' round 2' square 2' square 2' square thermal thermal thermal thermal JM Custom JM Custom JM Custom JM Custom

3/1/2007 1/1/1999 6/1/1956 6/1/1953

JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar

with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar

with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. JM is not familiar

with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal <1% <1% <1% <1% 1,700 @ 200 9,000 @ 400 45,000 @ 90 44,000 @ 100

200 400 90 100

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal 5-7% 5-15% 5-7% 5-7%



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive
ma intenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce emissions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-5**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**
**V. Process - Curing**

For each Curing Oven: Process unit identification name/number

Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Method of curing Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Major rebuilds:

W hat constitues a major rebuild Frequency

of a major rebuild Cost of ty pical major rebuild Date of last major rebuild Purpose of last major rebuild Increase or decrease in emissions Fuel ty pe: electric, gas, or oil
Fuel consumption rate (KW /hr or BTU/hr) Moisture content wt (%) of formed mat:

inlet outlet Air flow rate (acfm @ ° F) from curing Exhaust air temperature (° F)
Residence time of product (mins) Binder content of cured product (LOI) Curing Oven 25 P318

Line 25 41.286089 -84.365084 40 ft 2' square thermal JM Custom

6/1/1954

JM is not familiar with the term "m ajor rebuild." JM conducts periodic routine
ma intenace. NA NA NA NA NA natural gas

See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal <1% 40,000 @ 75 75

See CBI Subm ittal 5-7%



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of routine/preventive
ma intenance procedures Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce emissions Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal

See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-6**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**

**VI. Process - Cooling**

For each Cooling Operation: Cooling Operation 89 Process unit identification name/number 89 Cooling Table
Process line(s) served (identification name/number) Line 89 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 41.305279 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.340553 Stack or vent height (units) 60 ft Stack or vent diameter (units) 48 in round Cooling air flow rate (acfm @ ° F) 22,000 Percentage of cooling air recirculated (if any) 0 Cooling air temperature (°F) 90 Nature and frequency of routine/preventive
ma intenance procedures See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls Describe process modification(s) since 1999 that reduce emissions See CBI Subm ittal
Describe future source reduction plans and schedules See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-7**

**PLA NT OPERA** 

**TIONS**

**VII. Process - Use of Solvents**

Use of Solvents

Volatile solvents used at your facility (where and how used) By agreement this question was limited to HAP containing solvents. W e interpret this question to apply to wool fiberglass lines, from melting through cooling. None List each solvent used and quantity (gal/y r) N/A Emission control device(s) used to control emissions from solvent usage/storage? N/A



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM B-8**

**PROCESS OPERA**

**TIONS**

VIII. Pollution Prevention
Please describe any

work practices, pollution prevention techniques, and control strategies evaluated and/or implemented at each process unit at your facility

(e.g., binder reformulation, alternative fuels usage, etc.) to reduce emissions of PM and HAPs you identified in Form E. You m ust specify

the year in which the facility im plem ented the practice/technique and identify the emission reductions (if measured) from these practices/techniques. See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM C-1**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 
**I. Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP)**

For each ESP: ESP Process line(s) (identification name/number) Furnace ESP

Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Furnace 201, Furnace 203, followed by

a ipolishing baghouse in series to emission point E19 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 41.285311 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.365384 Stack or vent height (units) 66 Stack or vent diameter (units) 5 ft round

Manufacturer and model United McGill Model 3- 300 Date of original installation 4/1/1979

Number of collection plates and configuration 3 fields - 36 plates per field, straight-verticle plates Gas flow rate to ESP (acfm @ ° F) 77000 acfm @ 320 F Inlet gas temperature (° F) 460 Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 400 Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.076 Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.0038 Average stack opacity (%) 0 Pressure drop across ESP (in. H 2 O gauge) (-2) to 20 Plate area (ft2 ) 11250 Vendor guarantee on ESP efficency (attach copy) None
Method of plate cleaning and frequency Mechanical Rapping, 70 mi nute cycle. Flow rate of plate washwater to ESP (gpm), if applicable NA Temperature of plate washwater to ESP (° F), if applicable NA Source of plate washwater used for cleaning, if applicable NA Concentration (mg/l) of dissolved and suspended solids in plate washwater, if applicable NA Conditioning agents used and amounts (in gpm or lbs/hr), if applicable NA



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsAmount of wastewater generated (gpd), if applicable NA

Amount of wastewater recycled (gpd), if applicable NA Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd), if applicable NA Method of wastewater disposal, if applicalbe NA Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) 23,000 Quantitiy

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) 23,000 Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) 500
Method of solid waste disposal Recycle and Hazardous waste

Nature and frequency of routine/preventive maintenance procedures **Daily** : Inspect and service water pum ps. **Weekly** : Clean and inspect spray

nozzles and rotary valves on coolers and EP m otors. **Monthly:** Clean and inspect compressed air driers. **Quarterly:** Calibrate voltage transmitters. **Semi-A nnually**  : Inspect drag chain re-feed conveyor and EP ductwork. **An nually**  : Perform EP shutdown and cleaning; check and replace solenoid valves; perform inspection of entire unit. Problems experienced with control device within the last five ye ars; how were problems solved? No major issues

Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor ESP performance, including parameters monitored Inlet/Outlet temperatures, primary voltage/current, secondary voltage/current, and field spark rate. Describe any

plans to replace or upgrade ESP See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM C-2**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**II. Scrubber**

For each Scrubber: Scrubber A Scrubber B Scrubber C
Process line(s) (identification name/number) 89 Collection Module A 89 Collection Module B 89 Collection Module C Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) P048 P049 P050 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 41.303286 41.303327 41.303357 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.340737 -84.340684 -84.340641 Stack or vent height (units) 90ft 95ft 96ft Stack or vent diameter (units) 7' round 6.75' round 6' round

Manufacturer and model Clean Gas Systems, Inc., Model #156 Clean Gas Systems, Inc., Model #144 Clean Gas Systems, Inc., Model #126 Date of original installation 11/1/1995 11/1/1995 11/1/1995 Ty pe (e.g., venturi, orifice) Venturi Venturi Venturi Gas flow rate to scrubber (acfm @ ° F) 63,000 54,000 40,500 Inlet gas temperature (° F) 100 100 100 Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 90 90 90 Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.0146 0.0171 0.0152 Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.0044 0.0051 0.0046 Average stack opacity (%) 0 - 15 % 0 - 15 % 0 - 15 % W ater flow rate to scrubber (gpm) 441 372 271 Percent of scrubber water from recycled wastewater 92% 91% 91%
Source of scrubbing water and type of pretreatment. Substance(s) added as part of pretreatment and amount used (gpm or lbs/hr) City water, no pretreatment City water, no pretreatment City water, no pretreatment
HAP composition of wastewater (mg/L) 280.58mg/L phenol, 80.22mg/L formaldehyde 280.58mg/L phenol, 80.22mg/L formaldehyde 280.58mg/L phenol, 80.22mg/L formaldehyde
Concentration (mg/L) of dissolved and suspended solids in scrubbing water Dissolved = 2784.0mg/L, Suspended = 116.0mg/L Dissolved = 2784.0mg/L, Suspended = 116.0mg/L Dissolved = 2784.0mg/L, Suspended = 116.0mg/L Scrubbing water temperature (° F) Am bient Am bient Am bient Liquid/gas ratio (gal/10 3acfm) 7.00 6.89 6.69 Pressure drop across scrubber (in. H 2 O gauge) 9.6 9.5 9.5



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsAmount of wastewater generated (gpd) 0 0 0

Amount of wastewater recycled (gpd) 627840 528480 383040 Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) 7200 7200 7200 Method of wastewater disposal POTW POTW POTW Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) 2,500 2,500 1,500 Quantity

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) 0 0 0 Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) 2,500 2,500 1,500 Method of solid waste disposal Non-Hazardous Landfill Non-Hazardous Landfill Non-Hazardous Landfill Vendor guarantee on scrubber efficiency (attach copy) no guarantee no guarantee no guarantee

Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures **Quarterly:** dp transmitter and water flowm eter calibrated. **An nual:**  shutdown and clean out. **An nual:**  Inspect and rebuild fan and ductwork. **Quarterly:** dp transmitter and water flowm eter calibrated. **An nual:**  shutdown and clean out. **An nual:**  Inspect and rebuild fan and ductwork. **Quarterly:** dp transmitter and water flowm eter calibrated. **An nual:**  shutdown and clean out. **An nual:**  Inspect and rebuild fan and ductwork.

Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problem s solved? scrubbers and venturi dam pers get plugged from debris, require frequent cleanouts scrubbers and venturi dam pers get plugged from debris, require frequent cleanouts scrubbers and venturi dam pers get plugged from debris, require frequent cleanouts
Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor scrubber performance, including parameters monitored CMS water flow, dp across venturi CMS water flow, dp across venturi CMS water flow, dp across venturi Plans to replace or upgrade scrubber See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM C-2**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**II. Scrubber**

For each Scrubber:
Process line(s) (identification name/number) Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units)

Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Ty pe (e.g., venturi, orifice) Gas flow rate to scrubber (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature (° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) W ater flow rate to scrubber (gpm) Percent of scrubber water from recycled wastewater
Source of scrubbing water and type of pretreatment. Substance(s) added as part of pretreatment and amount used (gpm or lbs/hr)
HAP composition of wastewater (mg/L)
Concentration (mg/L) of dissolved and suspended solids in scrubbing water Scrubbing water temperature (° F) Liquid/gas ratio (gal/10 3acfm) Pressure drop across scrubber (in. H 2 O gauge) Scrubber Cooling Scrubber 801 Scrubber 802
Line 89 Cooling Scrubber Line 801 Scrubber Line 802 Scrubber

P052 P064 P067

41.303905 41.306196 41.306196 -84.340660 -84.338608 -84.338731 60 ft 51.6 ft 51.6 ft 48" round 5' round 5' round Clean Gas Systems, Inc., Model #96 Clean Gas Systems Model 102 Clean Gas Systems Model 102 11/1/1995 6/1/2007 5/1/2007 Venturi Venturi Venturi

22,000 23000 23000 92 120 120 65 85 85 0.0066 0.061 0.061 0.0020 0.018 0.018 0 - 10 % 0 - 5 % 0 - 5 % 139 220 220 90% 100% 100%
City water, no pretreatment process water; pretreatment RO and Hydrofloat process water; pretreatment RO and Hydrofloat 280.58mg/L phenol, 80.22mg/L formaldehyde Formaldehyde: 702.46 Phenol: 639.97 Formaldehyde: 702.46 Phenol: 639.97
Dissolved = 2784.0mg/L, Suspended = 116.0mg/L Dissolved: 693.0 mg/L Susp.: 148.0 mg/L Dissolved: 693.0 mg/L Susp.: 148.0 mg/L Am bient Am bient Am bient 6.32 9.57 9.57 8.5 10 - 30 10 - 30



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsAmount of wastewater generated (gpd)

Amount of wastewater recycled (gpd) Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) Method of wastewater disposal Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Method of solid waste disposal Vendor guarantee on scrubber efficiency (attach copy)

Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures

Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problem s solved?
Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor scrubber performance, including parameters monitored Plans to replace or upgrade scrubber 0 0 0 192960 316800 316800 7200 0 0 POTW NA NA

1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 Non-Hazardous Landfill Non-Hazardous Landfill Non-Hazardous Landfill no guarantee no guarantee no guarantee
**Quarterly:** dp transmitter and water flowm eter calibrated. **An nual:**  shutdown and clean out. **An nual:**  Inspect and rebuild fan and ductwork. **Bi-monthly** : Inspect and clean scrubber **Quarterly** : Calibrate
me ters **Bi-monthly** : Inspect and clean scrubber **Quarterly** : Calibrate
me ters scrubbers and venturi dam pers get plugged from debris, require frequent cleanouts scrubbers and venturi dam pers get plugged from debris, require frequent cleanouts scrubbers and venturi dam pers get plugged from debris, require frequent cleanouts CMS water flow, dp across venturi CMS water flow, dp across venturi CMS water flow, dp across venturi See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM C-2**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**II. Scrubber**

For each Scrubber:
Process line(s) (identification name/number) Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units)

Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Ty pe (e.g., venturi, orifice) Gas flow rate to scrubber (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature (° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) W ater flow rate to scrubber (gpm) Percent of scrubber water from recycled wastewater
Source of scrubbing water and type of pretreatment. Substance(s) added as part of pretreatment and amount used (gpm or lbs/hr)
HAP composition of wastewater (mg/L)
Concentration (mg/L) of dissolved and suspended solids in scrubbing water Scrubbing water temperature (° F) Liquid/gas ratio (gal/10 3acfm) Pressure drop across scrubber (in. H 2 O gauge) Scrubber 803 Scrubber 804 Scrubber 805

Line 803 Scrubber Line 804 Scrubber Line 805 Scrubber

P070 P073 P076

41.306196 41.306196 41.306196 -84.338828 -84.338932 -84.339042 51.6 ft 51.6 ft 51.6 ft 5' round 5' round 5' round Clean Gas Systems Model 102 Clean Gas Systems Model 102 Clean Gas Systems Model 102 3/1/2007 2/1/2007 1/1/2007 Venturi Venturi Venturi

23000 23000 23000 120 120 120 85 85 85 0.061 0.061 0.061 0.018 0.018 0.018 0 - 5 % 0 - 5 % 0 - 5 % 220 220 220 100% 100% 100% process water; pretreatment RO and Hydrofloat process water; pretreatment RO and Hydrofloat process water; pretreatment RO and Hydrofloat Formaldehyde: 702.46 Phenol: 639.97 Formaldehyde: 702.46 Phenol: 639.97 Formaldehyde: 702.46 Phenol: 639.97
Dissolved: 693.0 mg/L Susp.: 148.0 mg/L Dissolved: 693.0 mg/L Susp.: 148.0 mg/L Dissolved: 693.0 mg/L Susp.: 148.0 mg/L Am bient Am bient Am bient 9.57 9.57 9.57 10 - 30 10 - 30 10 - 30



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsAmount of wastewater generated (gpd)

Amount of wastewater recycled (gpd) Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) Method of wastewater disposal Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Method of solid waste disposal Vendor guarantee on scrubber efficiency (attach copy)

Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures

Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problem s solved?
Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor scrubber performance, including parameters monitored Plans to replace or upgrade scrubber 0 0 0 316800 316800 316800 0 0 0 NA NA NA

1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 Non-Hazardous Landfill Non-Hazardous Landfill Non-Hazardous Landfill no guarantee no guarantee no guarantee

**Bi-monthly** : Inspect and clean scrubber **Quarterly** : Calibrate
me ters **Bi-monthly** : Inspect and clean scrubber **Quarterly** : Calibrate
me ters **Bi-monthly** : Inspect and clean scrubber **Quarterly** : Calibrate
me ters scrubbers and venturi dam pers get plugged from debris, require frequent cleanouts scrubbers and venturi dam pers get plugged from debris, require frequent cleanouts scrubbers and venturi dam pers get plugged from debris, require frequent cleanouts CMS water flow, dp across venturi CMS water flow, dp across venturi CMS water flow, dp across venturi See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM C-2**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**II. Scrubber**

For each Scrubber:
Process line(s) (identification name/number) Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units)

Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Ty pe (e.g., venturi, orifice) Gas flow rate to scrubber (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature (° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) W ater flow rate to scrubber (gpm) Percent of scrubber water from recycled wastewater
Source of scrubbing water and type of pretreatment. Substance(s) added as part of pretreatment and amount used (gpm or lbs/hr)
HAP composition of wastewater (mg/L)
Concentration (mg/L) of dissolved and suspended solids in scrubbing water Scrubbing water temperature (° F) Liquid/gas ratio (gal/10 3acfm) Pressure drop across scrubber (in. H 2 O gauge) Scrubber 806 Scrubber 807

Line 806 Scrubber Line 807 Scrubber

P079 P082

41.306196 41.306196 -84.339155 -84.339227 51.6 ft 51.6 ft 5' round 5' round Clean Gas Systems Model 102 Clean Gas Systems Model 102 2/1/2007 1/1/2007 Venturi Venturi

23000 23000 120 120 85 85 0.061 0.061 0.018 0.018 0 - 5 % 0 - 5 % 220 220 100% 100% process water; pretreatment RO and Hydrofloat process water; pretreatment RO and Hydrofloat Formaldehyde: 702.46 Phenol: 639.97 Formaldehyde: 702.46 Phenol: 639.97
Dissolved: 693.0 mg/L Susp.: 148.0 mg/L Dissolved: 693.0 mg/L Susp.: 148.0 mg/L Am bient Am bient 9.57 9.57 10 - 30 10 - 30



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsAmount of wastewater generated (gpd)

Amount of wastewater recycled (gpd) Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) Method of wastewater disposal Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Method of solid waste disposal Vendor guarantee on scrubber efficiency (attach copy)

Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures

Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problem s solved?
Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor scrubber performance, including parameters monitored Plans to replace or upgrade scrubber 0 0 316800 316800 0 0 NA NA

1,000 1,000 0 0 1,000 1,000 Non-Hazardous Landfill Non-Hazardous Landfill no guarantee no guarantee

**Bi-monthly** : Inspect and clean scrubber **Quarterly** : Calibrate
me ters **Bi-monthly** : Inspect and clean scrubber **Quarterly** : Calibrate
me ters scrubbers and venturi dam pers get plugged from debris, require frequent cleanouts scrubbers and venturi dam pers get plugged from debris, require frequent cleanouts CMS water flow, dp across venturi CMS water flow, dp across venturi See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM C-3**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**III. Mechanical Collector**

For each Mechanical Collector: Mechanical Collector 1 Process line(s) (identification name/number) 

### None Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Ty pe of mechanical collector Gas flow rate to collector (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature (° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) Overall pressure drop (in. H 2 O gauge) Vendor guarantee on mechanical collector efficiency (attach copy) Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Method of solid waste disposal
Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Problems experienced with control device within the last five ye ars; how were problems solved? Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor performance, including parameters monitored Plans to replace or upgrade mechanical collector



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM C-4**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**IV. Fabric Filter**

For each Fabric Filter: Furnace Baghouse Line 89 Baghouse Pipe Melter Baghouse Process line(s) (identification name/number) Furnace Baghouse Line 89 Melter DC
Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Furnace 2601, 2603 Production Line 89 Melter #1, Melter #2, Melter #3 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 41.285099 41.303383 41.306152 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.365577 -84.340764 -84.338994 Stack or vent height (units) 75ft 70ft 50ft Stack or vent diameter (units) 5' round 4' round 1.27' round

Manufacturer and model Wh eelabrator Air Pollution Control, Model Pulse Jet III, 4-mod Hosokawa Mikropul, Model TR Mikro-Pulsaire Flex Kleen - 100BVB36XL(III)G Date of original installation 10/1/1993 6/1/1998 11/1/2006 Number of compartments 4 3 2 Number of bags per compartment 288 180 36 Filter material and coatings applied Nomex felt polyester Nomex felt Fabric weight (oz/yd 2 ) 14 oz. 16 oz 14 oz. Filter surface area (ft2 ) 26380 2118.6 457 Gas flow rate to filter (acfm @ ° F) 60,000 25,000 8,880 Inlet gas temperature (° F) 350 90 375 Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 283 90 375 Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.0038 0.029 0.825451959 Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.0019 0.0029 0.00825452 Average stack opacity (%) 0 0 0 Overall pressure drop (in. H 2 O gauge) 2-20 0.5-10 0.5 - 10

Method and frequency of bag cleaning bags replaced upon bag leak alarm, scheduled replacement every

4 years bags replaced upon bag leak

alarm, scheduled replacement every

5 years bags replaced upon bag leak

alarm, scheduled
ma intenance Vendor guarantee on fabric filter efficiency (attach copy) No guarantee No guarantee No guarantee Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) 350000 330000 11000



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsQuantity of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) 348500 0 0 Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) 1500 330000 11000 Method of solid waste disposal Hazardous waste landfill Hazardous waste landfill Non-hazardous landfill

Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures **Weekly:** baghouse fan motor inspected. **Monthly:** Inspect and repair pulse valves; Bag leak functionalty

test **Quarterly:** Meter inspection; dp monitor calibration **Semiannual** : inspect ductwork, feed conveyor, rotary valves **An nually**  : One module cleanout and bag changes on rotating schedule; zero calibration of leak detector. **Quarterly:** Meter inspection. **Semiannual:** baghouse inspection (internal). **An nual:**  shutdown for booster fan and internal components. **Monthly:** dust collector inspection, daily

mechanic checklist. **Quarterly:** Meter inspection.

Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problems solved? None None None
Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor performance, including parameters monitored Bag leak detection system, differential pressure monitor. Bag leak detection system, differential pressure monitor. Bag leak detection system, differential pressure monitor. Plans to replace or upgrade fabric filter See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM C-5**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**V. Thermal Incinerator**

For each Thermal Incinerator: Thermal Oxidizer Process line(s) (identification name/number) Line 89 RTO
Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) P052 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 41.305557 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.340553 Stack or vent height (units) 50 ft Stack or vent diameter (units) 4' round Manufacturer and model ABB, No Model Date of original installation 6/1/1995 Fuel ty pe: gas or oil Natural gas Fuel consumption rate (BTU/hr) 9,000,000 Inlet gas flow rate (acfm @ ° F) 35,000 Inlet gas temperature (° F) 1,100 Combustion chamber gas temperature ( ° F) 1552F minimum Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 360 Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.1218 Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.0024 Average stack opacity (%) 0% Excess air (%) unknown Residence time (sec) at temperature (° F) 2sec @1552F Percent heat recovery 0 Vendor guarantee on incinerator efficiency (attach copy) No guarantee



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsNature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures **Weekly -** Drain accumulated tank **Semiannual -** Shutdown and rebuild m edia,
me chanical, electrical.

Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problems solved? 1) Vary ing tem perature throughout TO media; difficult to operate efficiently 2) Plugging of media bed following process upsets inside oven forcing expensive rebuild of bed 3) Methane buildup in ductwork leading to TO. Solved problem by

installing LEL m eters in ductwork.

Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor incinerator performance, including parameters monitored Thermocouples and PLC to
mo nitor - temp, air flow, differential pressure, LEL, power loss, other alarms Plans to replace or upgrade thermal incinerator See CBI Subm ittal



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM C-6**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**VI. High Velocity A ir Filter (HVA** **F)**

For each HVAF: HVAF 1 HVAF 1 Process line(s) (identification name/number) North HEAF South HEAF
Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Line 21 (P325) and 24 (P317) Curing Oven operations Line 21 (P325) and 24 (P317) Curing Oven operations Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 41.286228 41.285847 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.364979 -84.365132 Stack or vent height (units) 40' 36' Stack or vent diameter (units) 3.2 ft 3.2 ft Manufacturer and model JM Design JM Design Date of original installation 1-Jun-1970 1-Jun-1970 Inlet gas flow rate (acfm @ ° F) 55000 @ 150 55000 @ 150 Inlet gas temperature (° F) 120 120 Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 100 100 Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.0008 0.0008 Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.00064 0.00064 Average stack opacity (%) 0-5% 0-5% W ater spray

pressure (sdig), if applicable NA NA W ater spray

rate (gpm), if applicable NA NA Filter face velocity

(acfm/ft2 ) 5200 5200

Maximum pressure drop across mat (in. H 2 O gauge) None None
Vendor guarantee on HVAF efficiency (attach copy) No guarentee No guarentee Method and frequency of filter mad advancement Rotation chain Rotation chain Amount of wastewater generated (gpd) None None Amount of wastewater recycled (gpd) None None Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) None None Method of wastewater disposal None None Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) 1500 lbs 1500 lbs



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsQuantity of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) None None Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) 1500 lbs 1500 lbs Method of solid waste disposal Non hazardous landfill Non hazardous landfill Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Bim onthly Cleanouts Bim onthly Cleanouts Problems experienced with control device within the last five years; how were problems solved? None None
Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor HVAF performance, including parameters monitored None None Plans to replace or upgrade HVAF No current plans No current plans



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM C-7**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**VII. Mist Eliminator**

For each Mist Eliminator: Mist Eliminator 1 Process line(s) (identification name/number) 

### None Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) Manufacturer and model Date of original installation Ty pe of mist eliminator Gas flow rate to mist eliminator (acfm @ ° F) Inlet gas temperature (° F) Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) Average stack opacity (%) Velocity

in m ist elim inator (ft/sec) Pressure drop (in. H 2 O gauge) For chevron blade mist eliminators: Spacing between blades (in.) W ashing frequency of blades For mesh pad mist eliminators: Number of pads or elements Thickness of pad (in.) or element dimensions Density

of pad, (lb/ft 3 ) W ashing frequency of pad
Vendor guarantee on mist eliminator efficiency (attach copy) Amount of wastewater generated (gpd)



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsAmount of wastewater recycled (gpd)

Amount of wastewater disposed of (gpd) Method of wastewater disposal Quantity

of solid waste collected (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste recycled (lbs/y r) Quantity

of solid waste disposed of (lbs/y r) Method of solid waste disposal
Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Problems experienced with control device within the last five ye ars; how were problems solved? Continuous monitoring method(s) used to monitor mist eliminator performance, including parameters monitored Plans to replace or upgrade mist eliminator



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM C-8**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 
**VIII. Ventilation System**
For each Ventilation System: Air Makups Process line(s) (identification name/number) 

### None Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) For general or building ventilation: Ventilation system used Airflow control system used Number of air changes per hour For unit or local ventilation: Enclosure or hood design used



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls Volume of enclosure or hood Capture velocity (ft/sec) Distance between hood and emission source (ft)



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM C-9**

**AI R POLLUTION CONTROL** 

**IX. Other**

For each Other Air Pollution Control Device (APCD): Line 82 Spray Tower Process line(s) (identification name/number) Line 82 Spray Tower Equipm ent/process(es) controlled. Include emission point designations (e.g., E3, E4 from plot plan) P012 Latitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) 41.303123 Longitude (decimal degrees, six decimal places) -84.339584 Stack or vent height (units) Stack or vent diameter (units) 11x7ft rectangle Manufacturer and model JM Custom Date of original installation 1996 Inlet gas flow rate (acfm @ ° F) 88,560 Inlet gas temperature (° F) 175 Outlet gas temperature ( ° F) 144.8



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls Inlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.0066 Outlet grain loading (gr/dscf) 0.0056 Average stack opacity (%) Not measured regularly
Description JM Custom spray tower used for PE abatement

Nature and frequency of preventive maintenance procedures Filters and spray tower cleaned out every

4 weeks.



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM D**

**PROCESS LINE STA RTUP A**  **ND SHUTDOWN**
1. For each startup and shutdown (SS) that occurred during the last five years, please provide the following information requested in A. through J.

Startup: the setting in operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose. Shutdown: the cessation of operation of an affected source or portion of an affected source for any purpose.

Process Unit **Furnace 300** Dates of Startup/Shutdown **7/8/2009** A. Using the definitions provided above, indicate whether the event was a startup or shutdown; Shutdown and Startup

B. A description of the event, including identification of the
em issions source or sources associated with the startup or shutdown; Em ergency refractory

repair on the throat section of the melter was scheduled to occur. The unit was cooled and following repair was restarted to production. Upon startup, batch material clogged the exhaust vent causing the melter to overpressurize

C. W hether any

permit condition was exceeded and, if so, what permit condition was exceeded; PTI 03-16294 conditions exceeded, Part III.A.III.2 Part III.A.III.5

D. W hether the event was covered by any contingency

plan for controlling emissions during startup and shutdown events and, if so, whether the plan was followed; if the plan was not followed, why not; Event was not covered under a contingency plan. Event was an em ergency situation E. The duration of the event; 6 hours F. The actions taken to minimize emissions during the event, including the use of any backup control systems; None

G. Estimates or measurements, if any , of emissions during the event; if you did not have the ability to quantify

emissions during the event, please explain why ; PM: 90 lbs Nox: 0.13 lbs OC: 0.93 lbs SO2: 2.4 lbs CO: 4.7 lbs



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsH. W hether the emission profile of each unit was different during

startup and shutdown than during normal operating conditions and, if so, how emissions were different and why ; please provide any supporting information; No difference expected I. All performance test data collected during each period of SS; the test method used for each event; when the testing was conducted and why ; the test conditions at the time of testing; and whether the tests were associated with a routine startup or shutdown; and No performance testing conducted during S&S events J. All monitoring data, including control system parameter
mo nitoring, collected during each period of SS. not readily available
If this information is contained in periodic and immediate SS reports (either stand-alone or contained within the periodic excess emissions report) submitted to your permitting authority , you may submit copies of those reports instead. See Attachment C

2. Are there any

ty pes of startup or shutdown events that you have been able to elim inate? If so, please describe the ty pe of event and explain how these events were elim inated. Wehave m odified the location of the exhaust vents on Melter 200 to prevent similar incidents. Melter 100 exhaust vent will be relocated in Fall of 2010. 3. Please submit a copy of your SS plan if you are required to develop one. See CBI Subm ittal 4. Please provide all performance test data collected during periods of SS over the last 5 years. Indicate the test method used for each event. No performance testing conducted during S&S events 5. Please provide all m onitoring data, including control system parameter monitoring, collected during periods of SS over the last 5 ye ars. See CBI Subm ittal 6. Optional: Do you wish to recommend a standard that would apply during startup or shutdown? If so, please describe the event to which the standard would apply ; the recommended standard (this could be an emission limitation, work practice, or operational standard) that would apply during the period; the basis for the recommended standard; why and how the standard would m inim ize
em issions during the event; and how would compliance be determined and/or monitored. No



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM E**

**PRESENCE OF A IR POLLUTA**  **NTS IN EMISSION POINTS a** 
Please provide any

existing emissions information and data covering hazardous air pollutants (HAP) and particulate matter (PM) for each listed process. Identify the appropriate box for which you are providing specific process information and/or pollutant em issions data.

**Me lting Furnace**  **Forming Curing**  Particulate Matter (PM, PM 2.5, PM Condensable) Chromium Compounds and Hexavalent Chromium (including any Cr speciation data) Other metal HAP (As, Be, Cd, Co, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se) Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Formaldehyde Phenol Methanol Other organic HAP The existing data requested here has been provided to EPA by the industry’s trade association, the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association (“NAIMA”). The existing data provided by NAIMA was set forth in NAIMA’s May 5, 2010 letter to EPA. The representative existing emissions data provided from fiber glass companies included test results for the following pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate
ma tter, hydrogen fluoride, metals (antimony , arsenic, bery llium , cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium), mercury , and hexavalent chromium. The representative existing emissions data provided from mineral wool companies included test results for the following pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, carbony l sulfide, hydrogen fluoride, metals (antimony , arsenic, bery llium , cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium ), mercury , and hexavalent chromium. The scope of the existing data provided was the result of consensus reached by EPA, NAIMA, and industry representatives. In addition to the existing data submitted to EPA, extensive new emissions data is being collected from virtually all companies through the “BTEC, Inc. Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Mineral W ool and W ool Fiberglass Emissions Test Program.” This Test Program will collect and subm it to EPA, through EPA’s Electronic Reporting Tool, representative emissions data for the following pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, carbony l sulfide, hydrogen fluoride,
me tals (antimony , arsenic, bery llium , cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium), mercury , and hexavalent chromium.



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM E**

**PRESENCE OF A IR POLLUTA**  **NTS IN EMISSION POINTS a** 
Please provide any

existing emissions information and data covering hazardous air pollutants (HAP) and particulate matter (PM) for each listed process. Identify the appropriate box for which you are providing specific process information and/or pollutant em issions data.

Particulate Matter (PM, PM 2.5, PM Condensable) Chromium Compounds and Hexavalent Chromium (including any Cr speciation data) Other metal HAP (As, Be, Cd, Co, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se) Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Formaldehyde Phenol Methanol Other organic HAP **Cooling** The existing data requested here has been provided to EPA by the industry’s trade association, the North American Insulation Manufacturers Association (“NAIMA”). The existing data provided by NAIMA was set forth in NAIMA’s May 5, 2010 letter to EPA. The representative existing emissions data provided from fiber glass companies included test results for the following pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate
ma tter, hydrogen fluoride, metals (antimony , arsenic, bery llium , cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium), mercury , and hexavalent chromium. The representative existing emissions data provided from mineral wool companies included test results for the following pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, carbony l sulfide, hydrogen fluoride, metals (antimony , arsenic, bery llium , cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese, nickel, and selenium ), mercury , and hexavalent chromium. The scope of the existing data provided was the result of consensus reached by EPA, NAIMA, and industry representatives. In
data submitted to EPA, extensive new emissions data is being collected from virtually all companies through the “BTEC, Inc. Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Mineral W ool and W ool Fiberglass Emissions Test Program.” This Test Program will collect and subm it to EPA, through EPA’s Electronic Reporting Tool, representative emissions data for the following pollutants: formaldehyde, methanol, phenol, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, carbony l sulfide, hydrogen fluoride,
me tals (antimony , arsenic, bery llium , cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, manganese,



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM F-1**

**COST**
**I. Process Unit (e.g., cupola, curing oven, etc.):**

For each Process Unit: Process Unit 1 Process Unit ID All Units Process Line ID
**II. Capital Costs**

Base year JM objects to this request in its entirety

because it seeks information that is not relevant to the EPA Adm inistrator’s review obligations pursuant to Clean Air Act Section 112(d)(6) and 112(f)(2). Total capital cost, including costs for individual pieces, if available. See Above **III. A nnual Operating Costs**  Base year (most recent fiscal year) See Above Total annual operating costs See Above
Maintenance materials and replacement parts (specify costs by item ) See Above Raw m aterials costs See Above Labor ($/yr) for each labor class See Above (hr/hr) for each labor class See Above Utilities (breakdown for each utility) See Above W aste treatment and/or disposal See Above Costs associated with any work practices and pollution prevention techniques that are employed at your facility See Above Savings associated with heat recovery and wastewater and/or solid waste returned to process from APCD (or sold to another user) See Above Indirect costs See Above Other (specify) See Above



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsPlease provide the annual report to shareholders or equivalent for the most

recent fiscal year. If reports are not available, provide annual sales and profits (or profit margin) for the most recent fiscal year. If company is publicly owned, please provide a web link to this information. See Above

Identify the market range (regional, national, international) of your products. N/A Can your product(s) be substituted by another product(s)? If so, please list yo ur product(s) and substituted product(s).

Identify the market range (regional, national, international) of your products. National

Can your product(s) be substituted by another product(s)? If so, please list yo ur product(s) and substituted product(s). Wo ol fiberglass is used as insulation, as are cellulose (scrap newspaper) treated to resist fires, spray

foam, foam boards, cotton treated to resist fires, and sheep wool treated to resist fires. W ool fiberglass insulation is preferred over these alternative insulation
ma terials because it is easily , economically , and safety installed in various building settings, has superior fire performance capabilities, and a 70- ye ar history

of proven performance and durability

.



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls**FORM F-2**

**COST**

**I. A ir Pollution Control Device (A**  **PCD)** See form F-1

For each APCD: APCD 1 APCD ID Process Unit ID

**II. Capital Costs**

Base year JM objects to this request in its entirety because it seeks information that is not relevant to the EPA Adm inistrator’s review obligations pursuant to Clean Air Act Section 112(d)(6) and 112(f)(2). APCD equipm ent purchase cost and what was included See Above List the cost for each piece of auxiliary equipm ent for each APCD not included above See Above Installation cost See Above Land purchase cost See Above Total capital cost See Above Method of financining APCD See Above Retrofit installation See Above Field erected or modular See Above

**III. A nnual Operating Costs**  Base year (most recent fiscal year) See Above Maintenance materials and replacement parts (specify costs by item ) See Above Raw m aterials costs See Above



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xlsLabor

($/yr) for each labor class See Above (hr/hr) for each labor class See Above Utilites (breackdown for each utility) See Above W aste treatment and/or disposal See Above Indirect costs See Above Other (specify) See Above Total annual operating cost (most recent fiscal year) See Above

Attach annual report to shareholders or equivalent for the most recent fiscal year. Alternatively , if company is publicly

owned, you can provide your company's web link to this information. See Above



### EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042-DRAFT-0009.xls