alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED  FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S  CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1999
AND  THE  RELATED  CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CASH
FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         118,323
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  182,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                    47,153
<INVENTORY>                                     88,474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               441,882
<PP&E>                                       4,709,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                 767,606
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,653,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          330,694
<BONDS>                                      2,493,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           940
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,618,526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,653,008
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               580,713
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  348,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,832
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,402
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,580
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 49,639
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,569
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,070
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (30,577)
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,493
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        




</TABLE>
<PAGE>
  <TABLE>
  
                                                                                         Exhibit 11
  
  
                                    GTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                            CALCULATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
  
  
  <CAPTION>
                                                      Three Months Ended           Six Months Ended
                                                            June 30                     June 30       
                                                       1998        1997            1998        1997
                                                                     (In Thousands)
  <S>                                              <C>          <C>            <C>         <C>   
  Net income: 
       Before extraordinary charges                 $672,448     $670,527       $814,171    $1,335,874
       Extraordinary charges                               -            -       (319,523)            -
       Consolidated net income                      $672,448     $670,527       $494,648    $1,335,874
       
  Average common shares                              962,407      955,533        960,930       958,115
  
  Adjustments to common shares:
  Add - Employees' stock and stock option plans        9,360        3,040          8,538         3,500
  
  Adjusted average common shares                     971,767      958,573        969,468       961,615
  
  
  EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
  
       Basic (1)    
            Before extraordinary charges            $    .70      $   .70        $   .85      $   1.39
               Extraordinary charges                       -            -           (.33)            -
               Consolidated                         $    .70      $   .70        $   .52      $   1.39
   
       Diluted (2)
            Before extraordinary charges            $    .69      $   .70        $   .84      $   1.39
               Extraordinary charges                       -            -           (.33)            -
               Consolidated                         $    .69      $   .70        $   .51      $   1.39
  
  
  
  
  
  (1)  Computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number
       of common shares outstanding during the period.
  
  (2)  Reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue
       common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of
       common stock.
  
  </TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1
  SUBSIDIARY
    
    STATE OF INCORPORATIONBorders, Inc.
    
    

    ColoradoBorders Direct, LLC
    
    
    VirginiaBorders Fulfillment, Inc.
    
    
    DelawareBorders Online, LLC
    
    
    DelawareBorders Online, Inc.
    
    

    ColoradoBorders Properties, Inc.
    
    


    DelawareBorders/JGE Joint Venture LLC
    
    
    MichiganWalden Online, Inc.
    
    
    ColoradoBGI (UK) Limited
    
    
    U.K.BGP (UK) Limited
    
    
    U.K.Evermatch Limited
    
    
    U.K.Borders Superstores (UK) Limited
    
    
    U.K.Books Etc. Properties, Ltd.
    
    
    U.K.Borders Bookstore (M) SDN.BHD
    
    
    MalaysiaBorders International Services, Inc.
    
    
    MichiganPaperchase Products Limited
    
    
    U.K.Paperchase Limited UK
    
    
    U.K.Paperchase Designs Limited
    
    
    U.K.Paperchase Designs Ireland Limited
    
    
    IrelandBGI Franchise PTY Ltd.
    
    
    Australia
# L_2013257EN.01S00302.xml

| 28.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 257/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 257/s3

---

NOTE TO READERS — WAY OF REFERRING TO ACTS

As of 1 July 2013 the way of referring to acts has changed.

During a transitional period this new practice will coexist with the previous one.

---
#### The State, ex rel. Crabbe, Attorney General, *v.*Poor.

*Public Utilities Commission*— Disqualification *of member*— Own*ership of stock parent corporation*— Subsidiaries *subject to regulation by commission.*

(No. 18176

Decided April 15, 1924.)

In Quo .Warranto.

*Mr-. C. G. Crabbe,*attorney general; *Mr. H. H. Griswold*and *Mr. B. B. Zurmehly,*for relator.

*Mr. John V. Campbell; Mr. T, S. Hogan*and *Messrs. Dinsmore, Shohl & Sawyer,*for defendant.

This cause coming on for hearing upon petition of plaintiff, the answer of defendant and the demurrer of the plaintiff to the answer of the defendant, and the argument of counsel. On consideration whereof, this court treating the demurrer as searching the record do sustain the same to the petition of plaintiff on the authority and reasoning of *United States, ex rel. Attorney General,*v. *Delaware & Hudson Co.,*213 U. S., 366, and *Opinion of the Justices,*75 N. H., 613.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the petition of the plaintiff he dismissed.

*Petition dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.

Wanamaker, J., not participating.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Willie Lee ROPER, Jr., Relator, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections for the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-604.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 13, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas corpus dismissed.
Exhibit
        23.3 – Consent of Ryder Scott





RYDER
                SCOTT COMPANY
            
            FAX
                (713) 651 -0849PETROLEUM
                CONSULTANTS11OO
                LOUISlANA
            SUITE
                38OO
            HOUSTON.
                TEXAS 77OO2-5218
            TELEPHONE
                (713) 651-9191





CONSENT
        OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.





We
        hereby
        consent : (i) the use in the Form 10-K of Hyperdynamics Corporation, a Delaware
        corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 under
        the
        Exchange Act of 1934, of information contained in our reserve report letter
        relating to the reserves and revenue, as of June 30, 2007, of certain interests
        held by HYD resources Corporation, a subsidiary of the Company; (ii) all
        references to such reserve report letter and/or to this firm in the Form
        10-K;
        (iii) our being named as an expert in the Form 10-K.





/s/
                Ryder Scott Company, L.P.RYDER
                SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.





Houston,
        Texas
 September
        27, 2007





1200.
                53C - 6TH AVENUE, S.W.
            CALGARY,
                ALBERTA T2P 358
            TEL
                (403) 262-2799
            FAX
                (403) 262-2790621
                17TH STREET, SUITE 1550
            DENVER,
                COLORADO 8O293-1501
            TEL
                (303) 623-9147
            FAX(303)623-4258
#### Frederick F. CORNISH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-704.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 21, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Humes T. Lasher, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24I0116. THE STATE v. MARQUAVIUS MEADOWS. 

The State charged Marquavius Meadows with carrying a weapon without a

valid license. Meadowsfiled a general and special demurrer, and on January 5, 2024,

the trial court dismissed the charge. After obtaining a certificate for immediate

review, the State filed this interlocutory application. 

The trial court’s order is subject to direct appeal under OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (1),

which permits the State to appeal “an order, decision, or judgment setting aside or

dismissing any indictment, accusation, or a petition alleging that a child has

committed a delinquent act, or any count thereof.” See State v. Mendoza, 190 Ga.

App. 831, 831 (1) (380 SE2d 357) (1989). Moreover, pursuant to OCGA § 5-7-2 (b)

(2), the State was not required to obtain a certificate of immediate review. 

This Court will grant an otherwise timely application for interlocutory appeal

if the lower court’s order issubject to direct appeal. Spivey v. Hembree, 268 Ga. App.

485, 486, n. 1 (602 SE2d 246) (2004). Accordingly, this application is hereby

GRANTED. The State shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice

of appeal with the trial court if it has not already done so. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

February 06, 2024

02/06/2024
No. 00-940.

#### Woods *v.*United States Postal Service et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2020240EN.01003202.xml

| 20.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/32

---

Action brought on 28 May 2020 — Group Nivelles v EUIPO — Easy Sanitary Solutions (Douchegoot)

(Case T-327/20)

(2020/C 240/42)

Language in which the application was lodged: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Group Nivelles (Gingelom, Belgium) (represented by: J.A.M. Jonkhout, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Easy Sanitary Solutions BV (Oldenzaal, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: European Union design (Douchegoot) — European Union design No 107 834 0025

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 March 2020 in Case R 2664/2017-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | declare invalid, correcting the grounds as necessary, the European Union design of Easy Sanitary Solutions BV; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare invalid, correcting the grounds as necessary, the European Union design of Easy Sanitary Solutions BV;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea(s) in law

| — | Infringement of Article 64 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 64 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 63(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 63(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

| — | Infringement of Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 13
- 00151
- CV

S. H., Appellant

v. The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. D
- 1
- FM
- 11
- 004887, THE HONORABL E DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDI NG

O R D E R PER CURIAM

Appellant S. H. filed her notice of appeal on March 4, 2013 . The appellate record

was filed on M arch 14, 2013 , making appellant = s brief due April 3, 2013

. The clerk’s record filed on March 14, 2013 , did not, h owever, include the trial court’s findings of fa ct and conclusions of law and, for that reason, on April 3, 2013, appellant requested a fifteen

- day extension of time to file a brief

. A supplemental clerk’s record including the findings of fact and conclus ion of law was filed with this Court on April 5, 2013.

Recent amendments to the rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a), available at http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/MiscDocket/12/12903200.pdf (providing 180 days fo r court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in gra nting extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion in part andorder counsel to file appellant = s brief no later than April 18 , 2013 . If the brief is not filed by that

date, counsel may be required to show cause why she should not be held in con tempt of court.

It is ordered on April 8, 2013

. Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Goodwin and Field
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000042872
<NAME> FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,683
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  444,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    162,865
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               833,849
<PP&E>                                         686,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                 129,471
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,870,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          477,571
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     16,318
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,929,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,855,546
<SALES>                                        121,618
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               671,964
<CGS>                                           82,937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  420,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               169,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                22,085
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,694
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,294
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,294
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
1 ... S eeT EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 20 8- CV IN T H E IN T E R E S T O F L .J ., J R . A N D L. J. , I I I , CH I LDR EN

----- -----

FR O M THE 3 23 DI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRA NT CO UN TY RD

----- ----- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON AND J UDGME NT 1

----- ----- W e h ave co ns i der ed app el l ant ’ s “M oti o n To Di sm i ss A ppe al . ” I ti s t he cou r t ’ s opi ni on t hatt he m ot i on sh o ul d be gr ant ed; t her ef or e, w e d i sm i ss t he a p p e a l . S eeT EX. R . A PP . P . 4 2 .1 (a )(1 ), 4 3 .2 (f).
P E R CU R I AM P A N E LD : D A U P H IN O T , H O L M A N , a n d G A R D N E R , J J . DEL I VERE D: J ul y 17, 2008
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Donald COLLINS, Respondent.

No. 43333.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 6, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 271 So.2d 156.

CARLTON, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.
ALD-173 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 12-2100

___________

In re: REGINALD YOUNG,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(Related to D.C. Crim. No. 2:05-cr-00307-003)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

May 3, 2012

Before: SLOVITER, FISHER AND WEIS, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: May 17,2012)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM.

In this petition for mandamus, Reginald Young asks us to direct the “respondent” 

to rule on his application for a certificate of appealability. In form, the petition reads less 

like a request for mandamus and more like a motion to expedite proceedings. In any 

case, it is moot; we denied Young’s request for a certificate of appealability. See United 

States v. Young, C.A. No. 12-1577. Therefore, this “mandamus petition” will be denied, 
2

as Young has obtained the ruling he seeks to compel. See Carr v. Am. Red Cross, 17 

F.3d 671, 684 (3d Cir. 1994).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND THE BALANCE SHEET, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,072
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      203
<ALLOWANCES>                                        60
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,337
<PP&E>                                           1,015
<DEPRECIATION>                                     326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              504
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,261
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,108)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,076
<SALES>                                            616
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   616
<CGS>                                              180
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (262)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,874)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,874)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,874)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.61)
        

</TABLE>