alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-01036-CV

IN RE PEDRO RODRIGUEZ

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 27, 2023

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On November 30, 2023, relator Pedro Rodriguez filed a petition for writ of mandamus. 

After considering the petition and record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief 

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

The stay imposed on November 30, 2023 is lifted. 

PER CURIAM

1

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. CC-16-60, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Veronica Rodriguez and 

Pedro Rodriguez and In the Interest of Pedro Rodriguez III, pending in the County Court at Law, Starr County, Texas, 

the Honorable Orlando Rodriguez presiding.
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700027

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

JOHN E. D. FRITZ

Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: CAPT Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Northwest, 

Silverdale, WA.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Commander Justin L. 

Hawks, JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: CAPT Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 31 May 2017

_________________________

Before CAMPBELL, FULTON, and PETTIT, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
#### Arend FERWERDA d/b/a A and F Farms, Inc., Appellant, v. DIXON FARMS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-378.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 24, 1970.

Will A. Nason of Nason, Gildan & Yeager, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

H. D. Faust and Robert C. Ross of Burns, Middleton, Rogers, Farrell & Faust, Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have thoroughly reviewed the point presented for our review by the appellant’s *456brief and the pertinent portions of the record. On the basis thereof we are of the opinion that no error has been demonstrated by the appellant. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDREN and REED, JJ., and COOPER, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 162

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives relating to the support

of international efforts to bring about democratic reform in the former

Yugoslavia through peaceful and equitable means.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1993

Mr. GEKAS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Affairs

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives relating to the support of international efforts to bring about

democratic reform in the former Yugoslavia through

peaceful and equitable means.

Whereas the leaders of the republics of Slovenia, Croatia,

Serbia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia, and Montenegro

are in disagreement concerning the future of the former

Yugoslavia and the individual republics;

Whereas the European Community (EC) and the Conference

on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) have

played a role in mediating a peaceful resolution to the

former Yugoslavia’s ethnic and governmental crisis;

Whereas violence associated with disagreements among republics and ethnic groups relating to the governing of the
2

•HRES 162 IH

former Yugoslavia has led to the unfortunate deaths of

civilians;

Whereas social and political turmoil in the former Yugoslavia

has crippled indigenous industries and ended tourism;

Whereas economic decline in the former Yugoslavia has been

the direct result of an increasingly unstable political atmosphere and the citizens of the former Yugoslavia have

suffered significantly from such economic decline in the

past year; and

Whereas the future of democracy and the integration of free

market principles in Eastern Europe are inextricably

linked to the future of the former Yugoslavia: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) the appropriate committees of the House of

4 Representatives should conduct hearings on the po5 litical and social turmoil in the former Yugoslavia;

6 (2) all nations and all appropriate international

7 bodies (including the United Nations, the European

8 Community, and the Conference on Security and Co9 operation in Europe) should assist in peacefully re10 solving the political differences of the region and

11 bringing an end to ethnic violence in the former

12 Yugoslavia;

13 (3) the use of force by the military or any citi14 zen of the former Yugoslavia to further a political or
3

•HRES 162 IH

1 ethnic agenda is detrimental to democratic reform;

2 and

3 (4) the Secretary of State should conduct ap4 propriate and timely briefings for Members of Con5 gress relating to the political and social develop6 ments in the former Yugoslavia.

Æ
#### Harrison *v.*Trader and wife.

*-Appeals*— when *transcript must he filed.*The appellant will not be permitted to *file*in this court the transcript of the record after the term to which, the appeal was taken, *except*upon a showing of due diligence, and upon notice to the appellee.

Where the appeal was taken November 19,1867, and the transcript filed July 8,1869, and there is no such showing, or leave of court, the *appeal*is considered as not having reached this court, and the cause is stricken from the docket.

*Appeal from Phillips Circuit Court.*

Hon. Jambs M. Hanks, Circuit Judge.

J. C. Palmer, for appellant.

English, Gantt & English, for appellees.

Harrison, J.

The appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this ease, upon the ground that the appellant had failed to prosecute the same by filing the transcript within the time prescribed by the statute.

The appeal appears to have been taken on the 19th day of November, 1867, hut the transcript was not filed until the 8th day of July, 1869, and then without leave of the court.

Although, as was decided in *Clay’s Ad. v. Notrebe’s Ex.,*11 *Ark.,*631, the appellant does not necessarily forfeit his appeal by failing to file the transcript in the time prescribed by law, he will only be permitted to file it after the term to which it was taken, upon showing that he has used due diligence, and that the failure was not owing to 'laches or neglect, and after notice to the appellee of his application. \

*622The transcript, not having been filed until more than a year after the term to which the appeal was taken, without such showing, or the leave of the court, the appeal has not yet reached this court, and the case is therefore improperly upon the docket, and will be ordered to be stricken from it.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Brosnan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Michael Brosnan
--------------------------------
Michael Brosnan
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2003
#### HENRY LORD *vs.*NATHANIEL HORSEY.

A deposition taken on commission may be attacked by denying the signature of tho witness, or proving a fraudulent personation.

The witnesses signature at the close, covers both direct and cross examination.

Contrary statements cannot be proved to impeach a witness, without notice.

Trover for a negro girl slave. Pleas, not guilty and limitation.

The deposition of a witness taken on commission, executed by F. A. Raybold, commissioner, was offered and objected to; because it was signed by the witness only once, at the close of the examination.

*The Court*

ruled the deposition in, without hearing the other side.

A witness was now called to impeach this deposition, by proving that the signature to it was not in the proper handwriting of the deponent.

This was objected to, because—1. It was too late. The deposition was already in evidence. There was no notice of this attack given to the defendant, or to the witness. 2. By such mode, every deposition would be invalidated. 3. The species of evidence was too feeble to attack.it. 4. It implies fraud and imposition of the grossest character, and seeks to establish it on the weakest kind of evidence. 5. The action of the commissioner, certifying that the true witness did sign, is like the certificate of a judge to the acknowledgment of a deed. 7. The best evidence is proof by the commissioner, respecting the person who was examined.

*Messrs. Layton*replied:—that the objection could not be taken earlier, for the necessity of it could not appear until the deposition was offered in evidence. " Neither can it be attacked, otherwise than by showing from the handwriting that the commissioner was imposed upon, and another person substituted for the witness. If in *318point of fact, this witness was personated, and the true person had never been examined by the commissioner, there must be some mode of attacking the deposition ; and the handwriting is the first point of attack.

*Layton*and *Layton,*for plaintiff.

*Houston*and *Cullen,*for defendant.

*The Court*(Chief Justice dubitante) admitted evidence to contradict the signature of this witness, as tending to show that a person had been imposed on the commissioner, for the witness personated. The proof failed; a person who was present having identified the witness.

*The Court*refused to rule out the deposition.

*Mr. Layton*excepted.

He then offered in evidence a letter addressed by the defendant to one of the witnesses in this cause, making (as was alledged) a different statement from her deposition.

*The Court*ruled it out.

The declarations of a witness not under oath, are admissible in evidence to discredit him, only on two conditions.—1. That the matter of discrepancy shall be material in the cause; and 2. That the witness shall be apprised of the intention so to impeach him by being asked whether he had not made a different statement to the person by whom he is to be impeached.

*Mr. Layton*excepted.

Verdict for defendant.
# Dec 2021
EXHIBIT 32.01



           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350
     OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE



In connection with the Quarterly Report of General
Employment Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an
officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of the
        operations of the Company.



Date:  February 7, 2005             By:  /s/ Herbert F. Imhoff, Jr.
                                    Herbert F. Imhoff, Jr.
                                    Chairman of the Board, Chief
                                    Executive Officer and President
                                    (Chief executive officer)


Date:  February 7, 2005             By:  /s/ Kent M. Yauch
                                    Kent M. Yauch
                                    Vice President, Chief Financial
                                    Officer and Treasurer
                                    (Chief financial officer)
# Official Journal C 110/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.110.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 110 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5617 April 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.110.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 110

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5617 April 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 110/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6870 — GE/Munich RE/Iberdrola Renovables France) (1) | 1 |
| 2013/C 110/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6746 — Mitsui/Severstal/Severstal-SSC-Vsevolozhsk JV) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 110/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6870 — GE/Munich RE/Iberdrola Renovables France) (1)

1

2013/C 110/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6746 — Mitsui/Severstal/Severstal-SSC-Vsevolozhsk JV) (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 110/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2013/C 110/04 | Commission notice concerning the date of application of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin or the protocols on rules of origin providing for diagonal cumulation between the European Union, Albania, Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Egypt, Faeroe Islands, Iceland, Israel, Jordan, Kosovo, Lebanon, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Morocco, Norway, Serbia, Switzerland (including Liechtenstein), Syria, Tunisia, Turkey and West Bank and Gaza Strip | 3 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2013/C 110/05 | National procedure for the allocation of restricted air traffic rights in Poland | 7 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 110/03

Euro exchange rates

2

2013/C 110/04

Commission notice concerning the date of application of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin or the protocols on rules of origin providing for diagonal cumulation between the European Union, Albania, Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Egypt, Faeroe Islands, Iceland, Israel, Jordan, Kosovo, Lebanon, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Morocco, Norway, Serbia, Switzerland (including Liechtenstein), Syria, Tunisia, Turkey and West Bank and Gaza Strip

3

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2013/C 110/05

National procedure for the allocation of restricted air traffic rights in Poland

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
## NO. 12

- 22

- 00259

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

FRANCISCO ZAVALETA, JR.

, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

P

ER CURIAM

A ppellant

, Francisco Zavaleta, Jr.

, filed a motion to dismiss th i s appeal. The mo tion is

signed by App ellan t and his cou nsel

. No decision has been delivered in this appeal.

Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to dismiss is gran ted, a nd the a ppeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.2 (a).

Opinion delivered January 25 , 202 3

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Ho yle, J., and Neeley, J.

( DO NOT PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JANUAR Y 2 5 , 2023

NO. 12

- 22

- 00259

- CR

FRANCISCO ZAVALETA, JR.

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

Appeal from the County Co urt at Law

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 001

- 80074

- 22 )

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to di smiss the

appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, A DJU DGED and

DECREED by this Court th at the mo tion to dismiss b e granted and the appeal be dismissed, and

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J

.
H. Res. 411

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

April 25, 1994.

Resolved, That the House of Representatives has learned

with profound regret and sorrow of the death of Richard

Milhous Nixon, former President of the United States of

America.

Resolved, That in recognition of the many virtues, public

and private, of one who served with distinction as Representative, Senator, Vice President, and President, the Speaker

shall appoint committees of the House to join with such

Members of the Senate as may be designated, to attend the

funeral services of the former President.

Resolved, That the House tenders its deep sympathy to

the members of the family of the former President in their

sad bereavement.

Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms of the House be

authorized and directed to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these resolutions,

and that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be

paid out of the contingent fund of the House.
2

HRES 411 EH

Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions

to the Senate and transmit a copy of the same to the family

of the former President.

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the

former President.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 750 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                         Calendar No. 6

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 750

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979 and to authorize 
     appropriations under that Act for fiscal years 1993 and 1994.

_______________________________________________________________________

             February 18 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

             Read twice and ordered placed on the calendar

                                                         Calendar No. 6
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 750

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 17 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

                                Received

             February 18 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

             Read twice and ordered placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979 and to authorize 
     appropriations under that Act for fiscal years 1993 and 1994.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 18 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 
2417) is amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(b) Authorization.--There are authorized to be appropriated to 
the Department of Commerce to carry out the purposes of this Act--
            ``(1) $42,813,000 for the fiscal year 1993;
            ``(2) such sums as may be necessary for the fiscal year 
        1994; and
            ``(3) such additional amounts, for each such fiscal year, 
        as may be necessary for increases in salary, pay, retirement, 
        other employee benefits authorized by law, and other 
        nondiscretionary costs.''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE ACT.

    Section 20 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 
2419) is amended by striking ``September 30, 1990'' and inserting 
``June 30, 1994''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 16, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GLOBUS WIRELESS, LTD. FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                            319,511
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,873,877
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                     1,143,891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                6,438,363
<PP&E>                                            633,120
<DEPRECIATION>                                    204,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  8,275,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,984,626
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           12,798
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,828,352)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    8,275,272
<SALES>                                         6,296,301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                6,296,301
<CGS>                                           5,163,933
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   5,163,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,350,023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,205,613)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,205,613)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,205,613)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0


</TABLE>