alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                          3D

                       Articles of Amendment to change name to
                               KALAN GOLD CORPORATION.


<PAGE>

                                ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT 
                                        TO THE
                              ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION


Pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado Business Corporation Act, the
undersigned corporation adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its
Articles of Incorporation:

FIRST: The name of the corporation is KNIGHT NATURAL GAS, INC.

SECOND: The following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was adopted on
November 12, 1996. as prescribed by the Colorado Business Corporation Act, by a
vote of the shareholders.  The number of shares voted for the amendment was
sufficient for approval.

ARTICLE I. The name of the Corporation is KALAN GOLD CORPORATION.

THIRD:  The manner, if not set forth in such amendment, in which any exchange,
reclassification, or cancellation of issued shares provided for in the amendment
shall be effected, is as follows: None.


This amendment is effective immediately.


                                       KNIGHT NATURAL GAS, INC.



                                       By:     ///Signed///              
                                          ----------------------------------- 
                                               Its President
                                               Title
259 La. 748

#### In the Matter of Succession of Lacy Brandon Petersen CHRISTENSEN.

No. 51564.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 1971.

In re: Dudley E. Petersen, Individually and as Executor of the Succession of Lacy Brandon Petersen Christensen applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 248 So.2d 45.

Writ refused. The result is correct.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000914 30-MAY-2017 05:22 PM
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 34 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 34

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 21, 1993.
    Resolved, That the following named Members, Resident Commissioner, and 
Delegates, be, and they are hereby, elected to the following standing committees 
of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Armed Services: Tim Holden, Pennsylvania; [vacancy]; and 
[vacancy].
    Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs: Calvin Dooley, California; 
Ron Klink, Pennsylvania; and Eric Fingerhut, Ohio.
    Committee on Education and Labor: Ron de Lugo, Virgin Islands; Eni 
Faleomavaega, American Samoa; and Scotty Baesler, Kentucky.
    Committee on Foreign Affairs: Don Edwards, California; Frank McCloskey, 
Indiana; Tom Sawyer, Ohio; and [vacancy].
    Committee on Government Operations: Collin Peterson, Minnesota (to rank 
following Gary A. Condit, California); Don Payne, New Jersey; [vacancy]; 
[vacancy]; [vacancy]; [vacancy]; [vacancy]; [vacancy]; [vacancy]; [vacancy]; and 
[vacancy].
    Committee on House Administration: Charles Rose, North Carolina, Chairman; 
Al Swift, Washington; William (Bill) Clay, Missouri; Sam Gejdenson, Connecticut; 
Martin Frost, Texas; Thomas J. Manton, New York; Steny Hoyer, Maryland; Gerald 
D. Kleczka, Wisconsin; Dale E. Kildee, Michigan; Butler Derrick, South Carolina; 
Barbara Kennelly, Connecticut; and Ben Cardin, Maryland.
    Committee on the Judiciary: Xavier Becerra, California.
    Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries: Tom Andrews, Maine (to rank 
following H. Maring Lancaster, North Carolina); Maria Cantwell, Washington; 
Peter Deutsch, Florida; and [vacancy].
    Committee on Natural Resources: Howard Berman, California; Lane Evans, 
Illinois; Patsy Mink, Hawaii; Tom Barlow, Kentucky; and Tom Barrett, Wisconsin.
    Committee on Post Office and Civil Service: William (Bill) Clay, Missouri, 
Chairman; Patricia Schroeder, Colorado; Frank McCloskey, Indiana; Gary L. 
Ackerman, New York; Thomas C. Sawyer, Ohio; Paul E. Kanjorski, Pennsylvania; 
Eleanor Holmes Norton, District of Columbia; Barbara-Rose Collins, Michigan; 
Leslie Byrne, Virginia; Mel Watt, North Carolina; Albert Wynn, Maryland; 
[vacancy]; [vacancy]; [vacancy]; and [vacancy].
    Committee on Science, Space and Technology: Lynn Woolsey, California; Nathan 
Deal, Georgia; Bobby Scott, Virginia; and Xavier Becerra, California (in lieu of 
ranking as provided for in H. Res. 8).
    Committee on Small Business: Martin Lancaster, North Carolina; Tom Andrews, 
Maine (in lieu of ranking as provided for in H. Res. 8); and [vacancy].
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lendon Rae COLE.

No. 62700.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 15, 1978.

In re: Lendon Rae Cole, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Union.

*782Writ denied. Mandamus application moot. Minute entry of August 24th indicates relator has obtained the relief prayed for.
#### Rosalind COLE, Appellant, v. James L. COLE, Jr., Appellee.

No. 73-913.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 28, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Thomas E. Sholts, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Marion CAPALLIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-474.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 20, 1973.

Robert P. Miller, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of the order denying his motion to vacate and set aside a judgment and sentence which were entered after appellant pled guilty to second-degree murder.

We have given full consideration to the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties. It appearing therefrom that appellant, has failed to demonstrate that prejudicial error was committed in the proceedings below, the order appealed herein is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal C 258A/10 O

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 258A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5110 October 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 258A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5110 October 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 258A/01 | Vacancy Notice for Director (grade AD 14) of the European Training Foundation (ETF) Turin, Italy — COM/2008/10118 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2008/C 258A/01

Vacancy Notice for Director (grade AD 14) of the European Training Foundation (ETF) Turin, Italy — COM/2008/10118

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### W. E. DEACON and Clifford R. Freeman, Appellants, v. ORLANDO R. I., INC., Appellee.

No. 70-121.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 14, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; B. C. Muszynski, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Wayne EAKES, Appellant, v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee.

No. 46357.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 8, 1971.

W. D. Moore, Philadelphia, Helen Mc-Dade, DeKalb, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Timmie Hancock, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.17.1
                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                     ---------------------------------------

     This  First  Amendment  is made as of the 24th day of  March  2003,  by and
between RADO ENTERPRISES,  INC., a Pennsylvania corporation (the "Company"), and
ANTONIO D. RADO, an individual ("Rado").

                                   Background
                                   ----------

     The Company and Rado entered into an Employment  Agreement  dated September
30, 2002 (the  "Agreement").  As more fully set forth herein, the parties to the
Agreement desire to amend the Agreement in certain respects.

                                    Agreement
                                    ---------

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants set forth herein, and
intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:

     1. Amendments.  Subsections  (i),(ii) and (iii) of Subparagraph A., Section
7. Profit  Participation  Payments.  of the Agreement is hereby  deleted and the
following new  subsections  (i), (ii) and (iii) are hereby  substituted in their
place:

          "(i) twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount, if any, by which the net
          pre-tax  earnings of the Company  during each such twelve month period

<PAGE>

          equals or exceeds $725,000 and is less than $1,000,000; and

          (ii)  twenty-seven  and one-half  percent (27 1/2%) of the amount,  if
          any, by which the net pre-tax earnings of the Company during each such
          twelve  month  period  equals or exceeds  $1,000,000  and is less than
          $1,250,000; and

          (iii)  thirty  percent  (30%) of the amount,  if any, by which the net
          pre-tax  earnings of the Company  during each such twelve month period
          equals or exceeds $1,250,000."

     2. Modification. Except as otherwise specifically set forth in Paragraph 1,
the  Agreement  shall not be amended or modified in any respect  whatsoever  and
shall  continue  in full  force and  effect.

     3. Capitalized Terms. Except as specifically provided otherwise herein, all
capitalized  terms used herein shall have the  meanings  ascribed to them in the
Agreement.

     4.  Effective  Time.  The  amendments to the Agreement  made in Paragraph 1
hereof shall be effective from and after the date of the  Agreement.  IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment as of the day and
year first above written.

                                            RADO ENTERPRISES, INC.


Attest: __________________          By:     /S/ David W. Menard
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David W. Menard, Chairman

<PAGE>


Witness: _________________                  /S/ Antonio D. Rado
                                            -------------------
                                            ANTONIO D. RADO, Individually
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOHN ANTONIO CRUZ,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 135 MM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25 th day of March , 2024, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
1

SkyViewHD®, 250 International Parkway, Suite 250, Lake Mary, FL 32746

Phone: 407-430-2271│www.skyviewhd.com

GPS Development, LLC

d/b/a SkyViewHD®

250 International Parkway

Suite 250

Lake Mary, FL 32746

April 6, 2016

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition for Amendment to Exemptions Numbers 11399 and 11399-A

Dear Sir/Madam:

On April 20, 2015, the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) granted GPS 

Development, LLC d/b/a SkyViewHD® (“SkyViewHD”) with an exemption from the Federal 

Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) - Exemption No. 11399, Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–

0147.

On July 10, 2015, the FAA granted an amendment to Exemption No. 11399 which added

additional Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“UAS”) to the list of aircraft SkyViewHD is 

permitted to fly - Exemption No. 11399A.

With this new Petition, SkyViewHD requests the opportunity to operate any UAS that has

previously been approved by the Secretary of Transportation under Section 333 of the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 including any and all aircraft found on the List of 

Approved Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) under Section 333 (the “List”). The List, which is 

updated monthly, is posted at www.regulations.gov under docket number FAA-2007-3330. 

SkyViewHD requests that it be authorized to operate any UAS on that list, including those added

to the List in future monthly updates to the List, when said UAS weighs less than 55 pounds 

including payload. SkyViewHD requests the ability to operate these additional UASs for as long 

any SkyViewHD exemption is valid.
2

SkyViewHD®, 250 International Parkway, Suite 250, Lake Mary, FL 32746

Phone: 407-430-2271│www.skyviewhd.com

SkyViewHD will continue to comply with all of the conditions and limitations imposed 

in Exemption Nos. 11399 and 11399-A as well as any future exemptions granted to SkyViewHD.

Other than the ability to operate the additional UASs referenced above, there will be no change 

in the conditions and procedures relative to SkyViewHD’s operation of its UASs and the 

continued emphasis on public safety which were the basis for the initial grants of Exemption Nos.

11399 and 11399-A.

Due to the fact that the requested amendment includes UASs which have already been 

approved by the FAA, under docket number FAA-2007-3330, and will not set any precedent or 

otherwise raise any new issues, SkyViewHD respectfully requests the FAA to determine good 

cause exists to grant the requested amendment.

SkyViewHD respectfully requests the FAA grant an amendment to the prior exemption as 

noted herein.

Respectfully submitted,

Philip A. K. Stiles, Esq.

President and General Counsel

GPS Development, LLC d/b/a SkyViewHD
#### JAMES ROWLAND *vs.*GEORGE HICKMAN.

A writ of error does not lie to the Court of General Sessions of the Peace and gaol delivery.

This was a writ of error to the Court of General Sessions of the Peace, in and for Sussex county, in a case of petition, order and return laying out a private road.

*Layton,*for plaintiff in error.

*Cullen,*for defendant in error.

*Mr. Cullen,*

on the first day of the term, at the June term, 1847, moved the court to quash this writ, on the ground that no writ of error lies by the constitution to the Court of General Sessions.

*Mr. Layton*

opposed the motion, and desired to be heard upon the question.

*The Court,*

unanimously, directed that the writ should be quashed, the same having issued improvidently, and not being given by the constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE GATEWAY
ENERGY CORPORATION FORM 10-QSB FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          62,942
<SECURITIES>                                   691,387
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,017,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    230,421
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,062,094
<PP&E>                                       9,438,579
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,009,215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,135,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,348,362
<BONDS>                                        601,522
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,828,050
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,358,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,135,991
<SALES>                                      3,335,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,682,835
<CGS>                                        2,554,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,712,277<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,024
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (651,250)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (651,250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (651,250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES $373,412 OF NON-CASH EXPENSES
</FN>


</TABLE>
H. Res. 357

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

February 10, 1994.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 3345) to amend title 5, United States Code,

to eliminate certain restrictions on employee training; to provide temporary authority to agencies relating to voluntary

separation incentive payments; and for other purposes. The

first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of

order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and the amendments made

in order by this resolution and shall not exceed one hour

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on Post Office and Civil

Service. After general debate the bill shall be considered for

amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order

to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment

under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of
2

HRES 357 EH

a substitute printed in part 1 of the report of the Committee

on Rules accompanying this resolution. The amendment in

the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. No

amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute

shall be in order except the amendment printed in part 2 of

the report of the Committee on Rules, which may be offered

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order

against the amendments printed in the report of the Committee on Rules are waived. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of

a substitute made in order as original text. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening mo-
3

HRES 357 EH

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11

                       W. R. GRACE & CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES AND EARNINGS USED IN PER SHARE COMPUTATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)


The weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding were as
follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       3 Mos. Ended                  9 Mos. Ended
                                                  9/30/95    -    9/30/94       9/30/95   -   9/30/94
                                                  -----------------------       ---------------------
<S>                                                  <C>         <C>

Weighted average number of shares of Common
Stock outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        96,708      93,995          95,330      93,893

Additional dilutive effect of outstanding options
(as determined by the application of the treasury
stock method). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         2,392         660           2,392         756
                                                      ------      -------         ------       ------

Weighted average number of shares of Common
Stock outstanding assuming full dilution . . .        99,100      94,655          97,722      94,649
                                                      ------      ------          ------      ------
                                                      ------      ------          ------      ------

</TABLE>


Income/(loss) used in the computation of earnings per share were as follows
(dollars in millions, except per share):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                          3 Mos. Ended               9 Mos. Ended
                                                     9/30/95    -   9/30/94      9/30/95   -   9/30/94
                                                     ----------------------      ---------------------
<S>                                                    <C>         <C>            <C>         <C>
Net income/(loss). . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         $21.7       $76.0          $147.9      $(20.1)

Dividends paid on preferred stocks . . . . . .           (.1)        (.2)            (.4)        (.4)
                                                       -----       -----          ------      ------

Income/(loss) used in per share computation of
   earnings and in per share computation of
   earnings assuming full dilution . . . . . .         $21.6       $75.8          $147.5      $(20.5)
                                                       -----       -----          ------      ------
                                                       -----       -----          ------      ------

Earnings/(loss) per share. . . . . . . . . . .         $ .22        $.81           $1.55      $ (.22)

Earnings/(loss) per share assuming full dilution       $ .22        $.80           $1.51      $ (.22)

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Harriet Marie JACKSON.

No. 54289.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 4, 1974.

In re: Harriet Marie Jackson applying for Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus and Habeas Corpus.

Writ Granted. See Order.

No ascertainable basis appears from the record to warrant the arrest and confinement of relator; accordingly,

Ordered that relator be released forwith on obligations of the previous bail bond fixed in this matter.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 399

Resolution electing Representative Obey as Chairman of the Committee on

Appropriations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 12, 1994

Mr. HOYER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Resolution electing Representative Obey as Chairman of the

Committee on Appropriations.

1 Resolved, That Representative Obey of Wisconsin is

2 hereby elected Chairman of the Committee on Appropria3 tions.

Æ