alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ernest E. WILLOUGHBY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. David BRADLEY, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. Willie HOWARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. John ST. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. John JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 66716, 66732, 6779, 67177, 67201.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 10, 1967.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Marvin J. Emory, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Barry N. Semet, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

These five appeals present a single question. In each instance the defendant-appellant was convicted of a felony in the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County, Florida. The issue presented in each appeal is whether the judgment is erroneous and must be reversed for a new trial because the record does not affirmatively show that the defendant was accorded and waived the opportunity to present argument at the close of the non-jury trial.

The appellants rely upon Floyd v. State, Fla.1956, 90 So.2d 105. See also Ruffin v. State, Fla.App.1967, 195 So.2d 26. It is urged that the language of the Supreme Court in the Floyd opinion requires the record to affirmatively show that the defendant was tendered the opportunity to present closing argument.

In each of the cases before us, the record does show that after resting his case, the defendant was adjudged guilty. In no instance was the question now presented to this appellate court presented to the trial court by a request for closing argument, an objection to the alleged denial of such, a motion for a mistrial or a motion for a new trial. We think that under these circumstances, the question may not be presented for the first time upon appeal.

See Dukes v. State, 148 Fla. 109, 3 So.2d 754 (1941); § 924.11, Fla.Stat. (1965), F.S.A. Rule 6.7(g), Florida Appellate *11Rules, 32 F.S.A. Cf., Hall v. State, 119 Fla. 38, 160 So. 511.

The judgment and sentence is affirmed in each of the above appeals.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 15—Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information**To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Goodrich CorporationWe are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements and intheir related Prospectuses, of our report dated April 26, 2007 relating to the unaudited condensedconsolidated interim financial statements of Goodrich Corporation that are included in its Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007:     **Registration**    **Number** **Description of Registration Statement** **Filing Date**33-49052 The B.F.Goodrich Company Key Employees’ Stock Option Plan — Form S-8 June 26, 1992     333-03293 The B.F.Goodrich Company Stock Option Plan — Form S-8 May 8, 1996     333-19697 The B.F.Goodrich Company Savings Benefit Restoration Plan — Form S-8 January 13, 1997     333-53879 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan — Form S-8 May 29, 1998     333-53881 Rohr, Inc. 1982 Stock Option Plan, Rohr, Inc. 1989 Stock IncentivePlan and Rohr, Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive Plan — Form S-8 May 29, 1998     333-76297 Coltec Industries Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan and Coltec IndustriesInc. 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors — Form S-8 April 14, 1999     333-77023 The B.F.Goodrich Company Stock Option Plan and Goodrich Corporation2001 Equity Compensation Plan — Form S-8 April 26, 1999     333-60210 Goodrich Corporation Stock Option Plan — Form S-8 May 4, 2001     333-60208 Goodrich Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan — Form S-8 May 4, 2001     333-98165 Shelf Registration for Debt Securities, Series Preferred Stock,Common Stock, Stock Purchase Contracts and Stock Purchase Units —Form S-3 August 15, 2002     333-107866 Goodrich Corporation Employees’ Savings Plan — Form S-8 August 12, 2003     333-107867 Goodrich Corporation Wage Employees’ Savings Plan — Form S-8 August 12, 2003     333-107868 Goodrich Corporation Savings Plan for Rohr Employees — Form S-8 August 12, 2003     333-109247 Goodrich Corporation Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan — Form S-8 September 29, 2003     333-123721 Goodrich Corporation Outside Director Deferral Plan — Form S-8 March 31, 2005     333-124244 Goodrich Corporation 2001 Equity Compensation Plan — Form S-8 April 22, 2005                                                   /s/      Ernst & Young LLP         Charlotte, North Carolina
Exhibit 10.1
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 First
Amendment Company Employee
  Agreement
   Employment and Term
 Term of Employment
 Compensation and Benefits
  Base Salary Base
Salary
   Termination of Employment




---



##### 



Payments Upon Termination of Employment
  Termination upon Expiration of Term of Employment
  Counterparts
  AVATAR HOLDINGS INC.By:
    /s/ Gerald D. KelferName:
    Gerald D. KelferTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer /s/ Randy KotlerRandy Kotler
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SCOLR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gail T. Vitulli,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Gail T. Vitulli
    -------------------------------------
    Gail T. Vitulli
    Principal Financial Officer
    SCOLR, Inc.
    March 19, 2004

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and
not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to SCOLR, Inc. and will be retained by SCOLR,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                       56
<PAGE>   1





                                                       EXHIBIT 11



                            GENERAL HOST CORPORATION
             ADDITIONAL EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Sixteen Weeks Ended  
                                           ----------------------
                                             MAY 18,      May 19,
                                              1997         1996   
                                           ----------   ---------
<S>                                        <C>          <C>
Earnings for full dilution:
  Net income                               $    5,602   $   2,794
  Add interest on 8% Convertible
    Debentures, net of tax effect               1,600       1,600
                                           ----------   ---------
  Net income, as adjusted                  $    7,202   $   4,394
                                           ==========   =========


Shares used for calculating primary
  earnings per share                           24,414      24,414
Additional shares from assumed
  conversion of 8% Convertible Debentures       7,611       7,611
Additional shares resulting from
  assumed exercise of stock options               588           0
                                           ----------   ---------
                                               32,613      32,025
                                           ==========   =========

Fully diluted earnings per share           $      .22   $     .14 (1)
                                           ==========   =========  
</TABLE>


(1)  This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item 601
     (b)(11) although it is contrary to paragraph 40 of APB Opinion 15 because
     it produces an anti-dilutive result.
#### John HORTON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 47594.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 14, 1974.

Eddie H. Tucker, Jackson, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Karen Gil-foy, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.

GILLESPIE, Chief Justice:

John Horton was tried and convicted in the Circuit Court of Hinds County of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill and murder, and was sentenced to ten years in the penitentiary. The evidence was more than ample to support the verdict.

It is contended that the testimony that Horton was wanted on a felony charge when the officer attempted to arrest him should not have been admitted. Officer J. R. Wilkins was shot three times by Horton after Wilkins lost his gun while pursuing Horton in an effort to arrest him. Officer Wilkins testified that the justification for *468the attempt to arrest Horton was that Horton was wanted on a felony charge.

Ordinarily testimony which shows, or tends to show, the commission by the accused of another crime is not admissible. One of the exceptions to this rule is that proof of such other crime is admissible if it sheds light upon the motive for the commission of the crime charged in the indictment. Tanner v. State, 216 Miss. 150, 61 So.2d 781 (1953). Proof that defendant is guilty of another crime is admissible when that fact (1) tends to show that the deceased officer had a right to arrest the appellant without a warrant, or (2) tends to show that the accused knew why he was being arrested, and therefore sheds light on the motive for the commission of the crime for which accused is being tried. White v. State, 70 Miss. 253, 11 So. 632 (1892).

We find no reversible error, and the case should be and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

SMITH, ROBERTSON, SUGG and BROOM, JJ., concur.
# C_2020191EN.01003601.xml

| 8.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/36

---

Action brought on 7 April 2020 — Almea v EUIPO — Sanacorp Pharmahandel (Almea)

(Case T-190/20)

(2020/C 191/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Almea Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Furneaux and E. Humphreys, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sanacorp Pharmahandel GmbH (Planegg, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark Almea — Application for registration No 14 030 126

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 January 2020 in Case R 246/2019-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | decide on costs for the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

decide on costs for the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the General Court.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
G-INVOICING OFFICE HOURS 

GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 

MAY 2, 2023 | GPO G-INVOICING TEAM 
AGENDA 

▪ Background 

▪ Readiness Schedule 

▪ Next Steps 

▪ Questions 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BACKGROUND 

▪ GPO provides a wide range of publishing products and services for the 

Federal government 

▪ General publishing services 

▪ Security products 

▪ Federal Register and Code of Federal Regulations 

▪ Distribution and fulfillment 

▪ And many other solutions 

▪ Highly transactional – process approx. 7000 invoices per month 

▪ Currently implementing Oracle’s integrated G-Invoicing solutions 

▪ GPO will continue to require GPO order forms (e.g., SF-1, 2511, 4044, 4045) 
 

 

 

 

 

READINESS SCHEDULE 

GPO as Buyer/Requesting Agency 

FY 24 – June 1, 2023 

▪ Ready to support: 

▪ GT&Cs – Standard Order Processing 

▪ Buyer Initiated Orders 

▪ GPO will continue to support legacy processes for Trading Partners that are not in G-Invoicing 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

READINESS SCHEDULE 

GPO as Seller/Servicing Agency 

FY 24 – October 1, 2023 

▪ Ready for: 

▪ GT&Cs – Standard Order Processing for Advances 

▪ Orders – Advance Payment Orders (GPO Deposit Accounts) 

▪ GPO will continue to support legacy processing for Trading Partners that are waiting for 7600EZ 

▪ To support Advance Payment Orders GPO is developing an enhanced Deposit Account platform 

▪ Agencies will have access to their GINV Deposit Accounts 

▪ Track 7600B Advance Orders 

▪ View Delivered/Performed information 

▪ View other obligation data related to GPO jobs 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

READINESS SCHEDULE – GPO AS SELLER 

GPO as Seller/Servicing Agency 

FY 24 – April 1, 2024 

▪ Ready for: 

▪ GT&Cs – GPO Print/Publishing (7600EZ) 

▪ Jobs placed using GPO standard forms and Publish.gpo.gov 

▪ EZ process expedites transaction settlements by combining Order and 

Performance phases 

▪ EZ requires fewer data elements 
 

 

 

 

 

NEXT STEPS 

▪ Communicate with your Printing Officers who do business with GPO 

▪ GPO's readiness schedule 

▪ GPO communicates with Agency Printing Officers through Circular 

Letters 

▪ GPO's G-Invoicing Page: https://www.gpo.gov/how-to-work-withus/agency/g-invoicing 

Contact us at GINV@gpo.gov to discuss the best options for your 

Publishing needs in the G-Invoicing environment 
QUESTIONS 
 

U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 

WWW.GPO.GOV 

facebook.com/USGPO | twitter.com/USGPO | instagram.com/USGPO
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08744

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

x 08744\08744_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08744\08744_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

08744\08744_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 08744\08744_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08744\08744_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08744\08744_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08744\08744_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08744\08744_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

08744\08744_Signed_Certification_Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

08744\Supporting Documents\08744_Cover_Letter.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08744\Supporting Documents\08744_Part_A_5-2_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08744\Supporting Documents\08744_Part_A_5-3_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08744\Supporting Documents\08744_Part_D_3-1_D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08744\Supporting Documents\08744_Part_D_3-1_D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08744\Supporting Documents\08744_Part_D_3-1_D-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 142 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 24

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 142

                          [Report No. 103-47]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
 consideration of a certain resolution reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 30, 1993

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                  House Calendar No. 24
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 142

                          [Report No. 103-47]

    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
 consideration of a certain resolution reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 1993

  Mr. Beilenson, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
 consideration of a certain resolution reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI for a two-
thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to a 
resolution reported on the legislative day of March 31, 1993, providing 
for consideration of a conference report to accompany the concurrent 
resolution (H. Con. Res. 64) setting forth the congressional budget for 
the United States Government for the fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, 
1997, and 1998.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<CIK>                           0000040643
<NAME>                          FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. DOLLARS
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          1,124
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   14,248
<ALLOWANCES>                    2,150
<INVENTORY>                     23,019
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                42,085
<PP&E>                          32,066
<DEPRECIATION>                  18,903 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  95,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           10,453
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        1,364
<OTHER-SE>                      45,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    95,382
<SALES>                         23,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                23,415
<CGS>                           14,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   14,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                8,671
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (755)
<INCOME-TAX>                    (264)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (491)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (491)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.13)

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 10

PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL

April 26, 2000



Mr. John Appel
[Address]
[Address]


Dear John:

As we have discussed, it is important to GTE that you remain with the company at
least through the closing of the merger. That being the case, if you remain with
GTE at least through the closing (or, if later, June 30, 2000) but separate as a
result of the merger thereafter, GTE will calculate your lump sum pension
benefit using the interest rate as of July 1, 2000 or the interest rate that
would ordinarily be used given your actual separation date, whichever would
provide you with the highest lump sum benefit. This special interest rate
protection will only be applicable if you elect to receive a lump sum pension
distribution following your separation, and any increase in the amount to which
you are entitled as a result of this commitment will be payable from the general
assets of GTE.

John, I want to thank you again for your flexibility. We need your leadership
now - more than ever. I truly appreciate this additional commitment.

Sincerely,



J. Randall MacDonald
Executive Vice President -
Human Resources & Administration

JRM:wh

c:       J. T. D'Angelo, Jr.
         E. D. Singer
S I O-J 00326-()08 


,'rp'r Or' Ut: i.-I 

! 

f:;;~T.AA . i 

PlltOMOl\lT TRIAD 

AIRPORT AUTHOR lTV ­

March 12,2010 

The Honorable Raymond fL LaHood 

Secretary 	 . 

O.s. D!.'tpartment ofTmnsportation 


l200New Jers:eyAve, SE 


Washingl<ln, DC 20590 


Docket DOT-OST··20 t0..;_ 


Dear Mr. Secrct{lry: 

Thank you for the opportunity Ie) express support for the application for antitrust 

immunity aridproposedjoinl business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan 

Airlines. The proposed alIiwtce between these lwoairUnesis vital for oneworld to 

compete effectively with (he Star_ and SkyTeamatliance, Tbis increased intcralliance 

.	competition will in-turn enIlnnce the benefits ofthc-Depurtll1ent's Open Skies policyfirst by solidifying U.S.~Japan Open Skies, then by serving as Il f()ttndation {br further 

liberalization across Asia. 

Afterll thorough review,! encourage the Department of Transportation to apptOvelhi~ 

application. a$it would e11able these uneworld atUance airlines to work c]oselytogether to 

deliver highly competitive air transporhltion services. Approval fbr AA/JAL alliancewiU 

bave a positive impact on nir trovel by offering customers more service, scheduling and 

pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue to bcncfitfi'oU1 having 

three competitive air alliances to choose from. 

I urge you to q~lickly approve this application. 

Sincerely. 

PIEDMONT TRIA OIlT AUTHOR1TY 

Edward A.-Johnson 

ExeclttiveDil'cctor . 

Pledrnont Triad Airport Authwity 

(ireensboro, North Carollna
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.2


Consent of Independent Accountants


The Board of Directors
James River Bankshares, Inc.
Suffolk, Virginia


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-99156, 333-07999 and 333-61329) of James River
Bankshares, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 1999, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of James River Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as
of December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1998 and
1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ Goodman & Company, L.L.P.

Colonial Heights, Virginia
March 27, 2000
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the use in connection with the registration statement on
Form S-8 for the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan, Registration File No.
333-135694, of Multi-Media Tutorial Services, Inc., incorporated into the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Multi-Media Tutorial Services, Inc., of our report
dated June 5, 2007 to the consolidated financial statements of Multi-Media
Tutorial Services, Inc. as of February 28, 2007 and for the years ended February
28, 2007 and 2006.





                                    /s/ Sherb & Co., LLP
                                        Sherb & Co., LLP
                                        Certified Public Accountants



New York, New York
June 5, 2007