alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Kinetics Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sandy B. Sewitch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/    SANDY B. SEWITCHSandy B. SewitchChief Financial Officer October 15, 2003




24
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL FANS 

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Room 8E-089

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) seeks comments, information, and data from interested parties on the 

Framework documents addressing potential energy conservation standards for commercial and industrial 

fans & blowers. 

 

Agenda

9:00 – 9:15 am Welcome and Introductions, Opening Remarks 

 Doug Brookman 

 

9:15 – 9:30 am Introduction and Rulemaking Process Overview

 Charles Llenza 

 Summary of the rulemaking process.

9:30 – 10:30 am Authority, Definitions, and Regulatory Options

 Charles Llenza

Summary presentation and discussion regarding statutory authority of 

fans/blowers for which DOE is considering standards and definitions. 

10:30 – 10:45 am Break

10:45 – 11:00 am Test Procedure and Efficiency Metrics

 Alex Lekov 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the industry test procedures for 

commercial and industrial fans/blowers and efficiency metrics. 

11:00 – 11:45 am Market and Technology Assessment and Screening Analysis

 Alex Lekov 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the proposed approach and 

factors considered for the market assessment and screening analysis

11:45 – 12:30 am Engineering Analysis

 Samuel Jasinski

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the proposed approach and 

factors considered for the engineering analysis

12:30 – 1:30 pm Lunch 
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL FANS

Agenda (cont.)

1:30 – 2:00 pm Markups Analysis; Energy Use Analysis 

 Dave Winiarski

 Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors 

 considered for the markups to determine equipment price analysis, energy use 

 analysis, and life-cycle cost and payback period analysis. 

2:00 – 2:30 pm Life-Cycle Costs and Payback Period Analysis 

 Alex Lekov 

 Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors 

 considered for the markups to determine equipment price analysis, energy use 

 analysis, and life-cycle cost and payback period analysis. 

2:30 – 2:45 pm Break

2:45 – 3:00 pm Shipments Analysis and National Impact Analysis

 Alex Lekov 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors 

considered for the shipments analysis and national impact analysis 

3:00 – 3:15 pm Preliminary Manufacturer Impact Analysis

 Samuel Jasinski

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors 

considered for the shipments analysis, national impact analysis, utility impact 

analysis, and emissions impact analysis. 

3:15 – 3:30 pm NOPR Analysis

 Alex Lekov 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the analysis that will be 

conducted in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) stage. 

3:30 – 4:00 pm Next Steps and Closing Remarks 

 Charles Llenza
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>   5 
        
<S>                                                               <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              OCT-31-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                                                    OCT-31-1996 
<CASH>                                                            40,009 
<SECURITIES>                                                           0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     10,525 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0 
<INVENTORY>                                                       76,316
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 175,767 
<PP&E>                                                           130,076 
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   307,647 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            104,610 
<BONDS>                                                                0 
<COMMON>                                                           3,803 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0       
<PREFERRED>                                                            0 
<OTHER-SE>                                                       199,234 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     307,647 
<SALES>                                                          281,059 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 430,407 
<CGS>                                                            233,202 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  1,145,361 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                19,191 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (734,145) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (734,145) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0 
<CHANGES>                                                              0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (734,145) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       (.21) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (.21) 
         






</TABLE>
PBS Office of Project Delivery

MEMORANDUM FOR: ePM/ePMXpress Users

SUBJECT: Deactivation of ePM/ePMXpress, User Access Removed July 22, 2022

As part of the transition to Kahua, ePM/ePMXpress will be deactivated and no longer used.

Below are 3 key ePM/ePMXpress decommissioning milestones to keep in mind:

● June 30, 2022 - Last day to update projects in ePM/ePMXpress that have not been

migrated to Kahua

● July 22, 2022 - Active ePM/ePMXpress users are deactivated

● October 15, 2022 - ePM/ePMXpress is taken offline and any project not migrated to

Kahua will be archived to the Enterprise Management Document System (EDMS)

Deployment of Kahua is currently underway across the organization. Active

ePM/ePMXpress projects are migrated to Kahua the week before instructor-led training.

Please check the deployment schedule to see when your projects were or will be migrated.

The transition impacts projects included in deployment Phases 1, 2, and 3 and does not

include leased projects in Phase 4. EDMS training will be offered in the Fall.

Please submit a ticket using the Kahua Support & Feedback Form if you need access to

Kahua or if you have questions about decommissioning.

As ePM/ePMXpress users, we wish to thank you for your dedication to project management

and for your ongoing support as we transition together to our new project management

system of record, Kahua.
# Official Journal L 220/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.220.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 220 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5517 August 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.220.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 220

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5517 August 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2012/466/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 3 August 2011 on the aid SA. 26980 (C 34/09 (ex N 588/08)) which Portugal is planning to grant to Petrogal
  (notified under document C(2011) 5546)

   (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2012/466/EU

*

Commission Decision of 3 August 2011 on the aid SA. 26980 (C 34/09 (ex N 588/08)) which Portugal is planning to grant to Petrogal
  (notified under document C(2011) 5546)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2011) 5546)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Staunton.

#### Union Insurance Company of Canton v. Damascus Lumber Company, Inc.

September 18, 1924.

Absent, Campbell, J.

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Washington county, in an action of assumpsit. Judgment, for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

*Affirmed,*

*George Bryan*and *Pennington, Price & Jones,*for the-plaintiff in error.

*Hutton & Hutton*and *L. P. Summers,*for the defendant in error.

West, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to a judgment for $2,537.63, with interest from December 6, 1922, till paid, rendered in an action on a fire insurance policy.

The pleadings, orders of court, errors assigned and evidence in this case are identical with those in *American-Insurance Company*v. *Damascus Lumber Company, Inc.,*139 Va. 380, 124 S. E. 269, in which an opinion was handed down today.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment in the instant case will be affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 354 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 354

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that 
committee reports accompanying authorization and revenue bills include 
     employment impact statements prepared by the Director of the 
                      Congressional Budget Office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 1994

  Mr. Gallo (for himself, Mr. Solomon, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Canady, Mr. 
    Armey, Mr. Machtley, Mr. Quinn, and Mr. Hastert) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that 
committee reports accompanying authorization and revenue bills include 
     employment impact statements prepared by the Director of the 
                      Congressional Budget Office.

    Resolved, That clause 2(l) of rule XI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
    ``(8) Each report of a committee on each authorization or revenue 
bill or joint resolution of a public character shall contain a detailed 
analytical statement prepared by the Director of the Congressional 
Budget Office of the estimated impact, if any, of that bill or joint 
resolution on public sector and private sector employment over the 5-
fiscal year period beginning with the fiscal year in which it is to 
become effective.''.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                             GTE SOUTH INCORPORATED
               Statement of the Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in Millions)                             Three Months Ended
                                                    March 31, 1999
                                                 -------------------
<S>                                              <C>     
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income from continuing operations                    $   68.2
  Add - Income taxes                                       43.8
      - Fixed charges                                      20.5
                                                       --------

Adjusted earnings                                      $  132.5
                                                       ========
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                     $   18.2
  Portion of rent expense
      representing interest                                 2.3
                                                       --------

Adjusted fixed charges                                 $   20.5
                                                       ========


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                         6.46
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-98314, 33-98316, 33-98318, 33-98320, 33-99464,
33-99466, 33-99470, 333-04008) of PSINet Inc. of our report dated February 6,
1998, except as to the first three paragraphs of Note 11, which are as of
February 25, 1998 appearing on page 45 of this Form 10-K.
 
Price Waterhouse LLP
 
March 19, 1998
Washington, D.C.
Exhibit 13.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Mark Williamson, the Chief Financial Officer of International Power plc, certify that to the best of my knowledge (i) the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of International Power plc.

|Date: 9 June 2005 |                                                          
|----------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                  | /s/MARK WILLIAMSONMark Williamson
Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
#### Treaist ELLENBERGER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PETERSBURG, etc., Appellee.

No. 72-986.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Mar. 1, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Kenneth H. SMITH, Petitioner, v. Jack KING and the Florida Real Estate Commission, Respondents.

No. 69-484.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 16, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 12, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          77,610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  702,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                    73,558
<INVENTORY>                                     40,726
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               815,765
<PP&E>                                       9,853,704
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,168,112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,148,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,233,078
<BONDS>                                      1,195,429
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     49,984
<COMMON>                                     1,400,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     251,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,148,740
<SALES>                                      1,590,934
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,590,934
<CGS>                                          532,750
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,134,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   675
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,633
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                403,843
<INCOME-TAX>                                   158,084
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            245,759
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   245,759
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Larry ANDERSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-237.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 24, 1973.

Larry Anderson, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

*491PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Berthel Growth & Income Trust I (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
J. Berthel, Chief Executive Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company Planning, Inc.,
the Trust Advisor of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


March 12, 2007                      /s/  Thomas J. Berthel
                                    -----------------------------------
                                         Thomas J. Berthel
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         Berthel Fisher & Company Planning, Inc.
                                         Trust Advisor
                                         Berthel Growth & Income Trust I
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,377
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  849,043
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,589
<INVENTORY>                                     46,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               978,985
<PP&E>                                       9,679,297
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,527,487
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,044,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,414,278
<BONDS>                                      1,520,086
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,298
<PREFERRED>                                     15,208
<COMMON>                                       978,351
<OTHER-SE>                                     457,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,044,362
<SALES>                                        772,069
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               772,069
<CGS>                                          260,325
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  483,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                258,411
<INCOME-TAX>                                    97,448
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            160,963
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  3,543
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   157,420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

ZION BULLITT AVENUE LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

WESTMORELAND COUNTY TAX CLAIM 

BUREAU, WESTMORELAND COUNTY 

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT 

CORPORATION, AND CITY OF 

JEANNETTE, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 341 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter.
#### William BOTWINIK v. Sam KANTER.

No. 38798.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 223 So.2d 397.