alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 350 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 350

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
    investigations and studies by the Committee on Public Works and 
Transportation in the second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 1994

 Mr. Mineta submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
    investigations and studies by the Committee on Public Works and 
Transportation in the second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

    Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and studies by 
the Committee on Public Works and Transportation (hereinafter in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including expenses for--
            (1) procurement of consultant services under section 202(i) 
        of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946; and
            (2) provision of assistance for members of professional 
        staff in obtaining specialized training under section 202(j) of 
        such Act;
there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House not more 
than $3,170,666.
    (b) Not more than $50,000 of the amount specified in subsection (a) 
may be used for consultant services referred to in paragraph (1) of 
such subsection and not more than $30,000 of such amount may be used 
for specialized training referred to in paragraph (2) of such 
subsection.
    Sec. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers 
authorized by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, 
and approved by the Committee on House Administration.
    Sec. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolution for 
investigations and studies carried out during the period beginning at 
noon on January 3, 1994, and ending immediately before noon on January 
3, 1995.
    Sec. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution shall be 
expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on 
House Administration.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

           (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2003 of Golf Host Resorts, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on the date hereof (the
"Report") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, R. Keith Wilt, Vice President & Treasurer
of the Company, certify, that:

         1)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the company.



                                       /s/ R. Keith Wilt
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:  R. Keith Wilt
                                       Title: Vice President & Treasurer
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)
                                       Date: November 24, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14313]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Predictive Markers.
    Date: July 10, 2018.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Room 2C-212, 7201 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Alicja L. Markowska, DSC, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#650804170e0a121604250b0c044b0b0c0d4b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="127f7360797d656173527c7b733c7c7b7a3c757d64">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 28, 2018.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-14313 Filed 7-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# all_lease01012020

# ESRI_MAPINFO_SHEET

DO NOT EDIT  For Esri use only
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 37

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Federal excise

taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel collected from vehicles shall be used

exclusively for purposes of meeting the Nation’s surface transportation

needs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1993

Mr. UPTON (for himself and Mr. HOEKSTRA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Ways and Means

and Public Works and Transportation

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the Federal excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel collected from vehicles shall be used exclusively for purposes

of meeting the Nation’s surface transportation needs.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the Federal excise taxes on gasoline and

3 diesel fuel collected from vehicles shall be used exclusively

4 for purposes of meeting the Nation’s surface transpor5 tation needs.

Æ
H. Res. 397

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

March 24, 1994.

Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the

legislative day of Thursday, March 24, 1994, for the Speaker

to entertain a motion that the House suspend the rules and

pass the bill (S. 349) to provide for the disclosure of lobbying

activities to influence the Federal Government, and for other

purposes, as amended, insist on the House amendment thereto, and request a conference with the Senate thereon.

Attest:

Clerk.
June 3, 2015

Mr. Bret McComb, PE President, CEO Precision Design & Drafting, Inc.

11768 Atwood Rd Aurburn, CA 95603

Dear Mr. McComb, PE.:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your January 24, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Precisoin Design & Drafting, Inc. into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0280), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,640
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  334,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,527
<INVENTORY>                                     21,243
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               360,435
<PP&E>                                       4,418,751
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,772,562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,186,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          416,078
<BONDS>                                        800,542
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        412
<COMMON>                                       525,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     151,802
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,186,640
<SALES>                                        775,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               775,310
<CGS>                                          262,690
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  511,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                235,253
<INCOME-TAX>                                    91,279
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            143,974
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    243
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   143,731
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### ELISHA PROCTOR, Negro *vs.*THE STATE.

In a penal proceeding before a special jurisdiction, the record must show every thing necessary to bring the defendant within the statute.

Certiorari to Justice Hazzard. The record was as follows:—

Capias issued February 7, 1855, by Justice Hazzard, to any constable of Sussex county, commanding him “ to bring Elisha Proctor, free negro, forthwith *to answer to a complaint of non-residence."*

“ The State of Delaware *vs.*Elisha Proctor, n.—Coming into this State a non-resident free negro. Complaint by Major W. Allen ; copias issued February 7, 1853, returnable February 21, 1853. ‘ Brought forthwith, saith T. W. Dawson, constable.’ And now, to wit: this 21st day of February, A. D. 1853, after hearing the allegations and proofs of the said parties, judgment is hereby given against the said defendant, for the sum of fifty dollars fine, and one dollar and fifty-five cents costs, one-half to be paid to the said State of Delaware, and the other half to be paid to the said Major W. Allen, the informer; and the said defendant was ordered to give surety in the sum of fifty dollars, that he would leave the State in five days from this date, and on his default in both the payment of the fine and costs, and the giving of the security, he was committed to the public jail.”

The copy of the complaint of Major W. Allen stated, “ that Elisha Proctor, a free negro, hath come into this State, after a voluntary absence of more than sixty days from this State; and that the said Elisha was not at the time engaged in any occupation of mariner or waterman, nor was he absent as a wagoner or messenger in the actual employment of a citizen of this State.”

The exceptions were—1. That the record did not show that Proctor was at the date of the act “in relation to free negroes and slaves,” March 5, 1851, a non-resident free negro. 2. That it did not show him to have been a non-resident on the 1st of January, 1853, when the Revised Code took effect. 3. That the justice had no jurisdiction, unless this was shown. 4. That the record did not show whether the offence charged was before or since January 1, 1853. 5. Nor how or when he lost his residence. 6. That chapter 52, section 2, of the Revised Code is unconstitutional—1. For depriving citizens of liberty, without jury trial. 2. For expelling them the State, without jury trial. 3. That the justice had no jurisdiction in the case.

*388
      *Layton,*for plaintiff in error.

*Cullen,*contra.

*The Court*

reversed the judgment, on the ground that the record did not show at what *time*the offence was committed; nor against what *law,*whether the act of 1851 or the Revised Code of 1853.

In a specially delegated jurisdiction and a proceeding under a penal law, the record must show every thing requisite to bring the case within the jurisdiction, and the offence within the law. That is not done in this case. The charge for which the defendant was arrested, is indeed no offence at all. Neither had the magistrate found him guilty of any offence, unless it be by inference, from having heard “ the allegations and proofs of the parties.”

Judgment reversed.
#### JAMES JOHNSON *vs.*AMOS STAYTON.

The obstructing a public road is not the ground of private action, without special damage.

This was an action of trespass on the case, for obstructing the plaintiff’s right of way over a public road. Some of the counts laid it as a private road. No special damage was laid. The obstruction was proved in a public highway.

*Mr. Cullen, jr.,*

moved a nonsuit; and cited 4 *Law Lib., Woolrich on Ways;*3 *Blac. Com.,*219; 8 *Cow. Rep.,*146; *Clinton's Digest,*1927 ; 7 *Cow. Rep ,*609; 28 *Wend. Rep.,*446 ; 1 *Esp. Rep.,*148; 4 *Mau. & Selw.,*101; 5 *Denio Rep.,*213; 2 *Bing. Rep.,*263; 2 *Ib., new series,*281; 9 *Com. Law.,*407; 29 *Ib.)*

*Mr. Layton,*contra.

The road is laid in two counts as a public road, in others as a private right of way» We may go before the *363jury on either. We are not bound to submit to a nonsuit. (3 *U. S. Dig.,*68.)

*Layton,*for plaintiff.

*Cullen*and *Houston,*for defendant.

*By the Court.*

Booth, *Chief*Justice.

The declaration joins, perhaps property, counts for obstructing a public road, with a count for obstructing a private road, and for obstructing a private right of way. The entire proof offered in reference to the character of this road is, that it is a public road. For obstructions to a public road, the remedy is by indictment. If one individual might maintain a private action for the obstruction of a public road, every person might. Such action cannot be maintained, without the allegation and proof of special damage. There is no such allegation or proof in this case, and the plaintiff must be nonsuited.

It is true that the plaintiff may, as he says, refuse to submit to the nonsuit, and go to the jury; but it will be a mere waste of time, as we shall charge the jury according to this ruling.

The plaintiff submitted to a nonsuit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ESI AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         654,529
<SECURITIES>                                 8,060,303
<RECEIVABLES>                                  475,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,827,061
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,222,804
<PP&E>                                       3,942,741
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,668,305)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,621,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,345,830
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,118
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,329,703
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,621,591
<SALES>                                      1,950,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,950,497
<CGS>                                        3,624,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,624,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,736,319
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              86,644
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,685,275)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,685,275)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.63)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 22 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 22

  Prohibiting the use of appropriated funds for acquisition of voter 
          registration lists for the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Roberts submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Prohibiting the use of appropriated funds for acquisition of voter 
          registration lists for the House of Representatives.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. APPROPRIATED FUNDS NOT TO BE USED FOR ACQUISITION OF VOTER 
              REGISTRATION LISTS.

    Notwithstanding any law, rule, or other authority, no appropriated 
funds may be used for acquisition of voter registration lists for the 
House of Representatives.

SEC. 2. CONTRACT TERMINATION.

    The Clerk of the House of Representatives shall take such action as 
may be necessary, in accordance with applicable law--
            (1) to terminate any contract or other agreement that 
        violates section 1; and
            (2) to dispose of any voter registration list acquired 
        under such a contract or agreement.

                                 <all>
```
#### CENTRAL NATIONAL INSURANCE GROUP OF OMAHA, Appellant, v. Giraldo GONZALEZ, a minor, by and through his mother, and next friend, Lilia Gonzalez, and Lilia Gonzalez, Individually, Appellees.

No. 72-810.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 8, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### PRELIMINARY AGENDA U.S. DEPARTMENT OFENERGY OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY PUBLIC HEARING ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL PACKAGED BOILERS, AND COMMERCIAL WATER HEATERS, HOT WATER SUPPLY BOILERS AND UNFIRED HOT WATER STORAGETANKS
PLACE OFHEARING:

DATE AND TIME:


### PURPOSE OFTHE HEARING FORREST AL BUILDING 1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, SW ROOM 1E-245 WASHINGTON, DC 20585 TELEPHONE: 202/586-9127 TELEFAX: 202/586-4617 WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20,2000 9:00 A.M.

- 5:00 P.M.

The purpose ofthis public hearing is to hear the views ofinterested persons on the proposedrequirements for commercial packaged boilers, and commercialwater heaters, hot water supply boilers, and unfired hot water storage tanks. The Department will consider the views presented andcomments submitted in formulating a final rule.


### I. OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS II. AGENDA REVIEW ffi. 

### COMMERCIAL PACKAGED BOILERS

- TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION A. General Statements B. Definition and Scope ofCoverage 1. Method ofShipment and Assembly 2. Boiler Application 3. Boiler Capacity 4. Boiler Operation C. TestProcedures for the Measurement ofEnergy Efficiency 1. Test Procedure and Test Conditions for Low Pressure Boilers 2. Test Procedure and Test Conditions for High Pressure Boilers 3. Boilers Designed for Low Water Temperature Applications

### • I 4. Condensing Boilers 5. Modular Boilers and Multiple Boilers 6. Testing and Rating a Steam and HotWater Boiler D. Other Topics IV. COMMERCIAL WATER HEATERS, HOT WATER SUPPLY BOILERS AND UNFIRED HOT WATER STORAGETANKS

- TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION A. General Statements B. Definitions and Coverage 1. Instantaneous WaterHeaters 2. HotWater Supply Boilers 3. Heat Pump WaterHeaters 4. Waste Heat Recovery WaterHeaters C. TestProcedures for the Measurement ofEnergyEfficiency 1. Gas-firedWater Heaters 2. Oil-fired Water Heaters 3. Electric Water Heaters D. Unfired Hot Water Storage Tanks 1. Exemption from and application ofMaximum Heat Loss Requirement 2. Unfired Hot Water Storage Tank Test Procedure E. OtherTopics 

# v. ADJOURNMENT
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 133469 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133469 COA: 274816 St. Clair CC: 05-000254-FH CARL DOUGLA S JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 6, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk