alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 265

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

October 15, 1993.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 3167) to extend the emergency unemployment

compensation program, to establish a system of worker

profiling, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Ways and Means. After general debate the

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill, it shall

be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment under the five-minute rule an amendment in the

nature of a substitute consisting of the bill, modified by the
2

HRES 265 EH

amendments recommended by the Committee on Ways and

Means now printed in the bill. The amendment in the nature

of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order

against the amendment in the nature of a substitute are

waived. No amendment to the amendment in the nature of

a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution.

Each amendment may be offered only in the order printed in

the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in

the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for

the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled

by the proponent and an opponent, and shall not be subject

to amendment. All points of order against the amendments

printed in the report are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as

may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate

vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order as original text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening mo-
3

HRES 265 EH

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
TITLE: "Various Forms" PROGRAM: 2809-SP

TERM: April 1, 2015 to March 31, 2016 (w/up to Four Options)

 


Basis Copy's in a Flash Lithexcel

Item No. DESCRIPTION of State 050 Code 23314 State 300 Code 52436

Award UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST

I. PRINTING AND CUTTING TO SIZE (except 

Items II & III):

Running per 100 copies

(a) Format"A", (up to 5 1⁄2 x 8 1⁄2) per printed side.......... 2700 x 2.25 6,075.00 1.50 4,050.00

(b) Format, "B", (over 5 1⁄2 x 8 1⁄2 up to 8 1⁄2 x 11) 

 per printed side........................................... 510 x 4.00 2,040.00 2.20 1,122.00

(c) Format "C",(over 8 1⁄2 x 11 up to 17 x11) 

 per printed side........................................... 10 x 7.00 70.00 4.00 40.00

II. PAPER: Per 100 leaves

(a) White Offset Book, 75 g/m2 (50 lb.) or White 

Writing , 75 g/m2 (20 lb.)................................. 1330 x 1.25 1,662.50 1.20 1,596.00

(b) Colored Writing, 75 g/m2 (20 lb.)....................... 180 x 1.50 270.00 1.60 288.00

(c) White or Colored Index, 200 g/m2 (110 lb.).......... 180 x 5.00 900.00 6.00 1,080.00

III. ADDITIONAL OPERATIONS:

(a) Folding....................................per 100 sheets 200 x 1.00 200.00 1.50 300.00

(b) Shrink-film packaging....................each package 525 x 0.10 52.50 0.50 262.50

CONTRACTOR TOTALS $11,270.00 $8,738.50

DISCOUNT if any 2% 10 Days 1.00% 87.39

DISCOUNTED TOTALS AWARDED $11,270.00 $8,651.12

Basis Texas Digital Copy & Print

Item No. DESCRIPTION of State 420 Code 86459 

Award UNIT RATE COST

I. PRINTING AND CUTTING TO SIZE (except 

Items II & III):

Running per 100 copies

(a) Format"A", (up to 5 1⁄2 x 8 1⁄2) per printed side.......... 2700 x 1.50 4,050.00

(b) Format, "B", (over 5 1⁄2 x 8 1⁄2 up to 8 1⁄2 x 11) 

 per printed side........................................... 510 x 1.80 918.00

(c) Format "C",(over 8 1⁄2 x 11 up to 17 x11) 

 per printed side........................................... 10 x 3.50 35.00

II. PAPER: Per 100 leaves

(a) White Offset Book, 75 g/m2 (50 lb.) or White 

Writing , 75 g/m2 (20 lb.)................................. 1330 x 0.60 798.00

(b) Colored Writing, 75 g/m2 (20 lb.)....................... 180 x 1.00 180.00

(c) White or Colored Index, 200 g/m2 (110 lb.).......... 180 x 2.75 495.00

III. ADDITIONAL OPERATIONS:

(a) Folding....................................per 100 sheets 200 x 1.50 300.00

(b) Shrink-film packaging....................each package 525 x 0.20 105.00

CONTRACTOR TOTALS $6,881.00

DISCOUNT if any 1% 10 Days

DISCOUNTED TOTALS $6,881.00

 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                     SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      Name of Subsidiary                        Jurisdiction of Incorporation
      ------------------                        -----------------------------
      <S>                                       <C>
      CBT Systems USA, Ltd.                            Delaware
      Personal Training Systems, Inc.                  California
      Fidalco Limited                                  Ireland
      CBT Systems Limited                              Ireland
      CBT Systems UK Limited                           England
      CBT Systems Africa (Proprietary) Limited         South Africa
      CBT Finance Limited                              Grand Cayman
      CBT (Technology) Limited                         Ireland
      CBT Systems Canada Limited                       Canada
      CBT Systems Deutscheland GmbH                    Germany
      Applied Learning Ltd.                            Australia
      CBT Systems Benelux, B.V.                        The Netherlands
      Ben Watson Associates Ltd.                       Canada
      CBT Systems Middle East Limited                  Bahamas
      CBT Systems Scandinavia Limited                  Sweden
      ForeFront Direct, Inc                            Florida
</TABLE>
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 The
        undersigned, Bami Bastani, President and Chief Executive Officer of ANADIGICS,
        Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Annual Report of the Company
        on
        Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934
        and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
 
 
 Dated:
        February 29,
        2008
 By:
              /s/
                  Bami BastaniBami
                  BastaniPresident
                  andChief
                  Executive Officer
 
  This
        certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated
        by
        reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act
        of
        1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
        by reference.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained
        by
        ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
        its
        staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Chang-On International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August 16, 2010





By:        /s/ Bing Xiao


Bing Xiao


President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,


Principal Accounting Officer, Director
H. Res. 44

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

January 26, 1993.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

they are hereby, elected to the Committee on the Budget:

Wally Herger, California, and Jim Bunning, Kentucky, to

rank after Olympia J. Snowe, Maine; and David L. Hobson,

Ohio, to rank after Wayne Allard, Colorado.

Attest:

Clerk.
Open Data Publication Process

**Internal Clearance Processing**

The EIDM team has collaborated with representatives of the GSA Office of General Counsel (OGC), the GSA Freedom of Information Access Office (FOIA) and the GSA Privacy Officer to develop an internal clearance process for GSA datasets prior to their release. We agreed that our goal is proactive disclosure of datasets but we will ensure that the clearance process has risk mitigation included. The process that has been implemented includes:

· Program Manager, the data owner, will approve the dataset and metadata for public release and seek approval from their management. Associate Administrator within the SSO will provide approval to the SSO Portfolio Data Manager (PDM). The PDM is assigned by the SSO management as an SSO liaison to the DMWG.

· If Datasets contain other agencies’ data, the SSO will need to coordinate approval/concurrence by Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 

· Datasets must be sent through GSA's internal clearance processing whether or not the datasets have been approved for release by OMB.

· If the OMB does not concur to publish the dataset, the dataset will be included in the GSA Enterprise Data Inventory and posted on MAX portal but not posted at www.gsa.gov/data with other public datasets.

· Datasets, along with a spreadsheet containing the metadata, should be sent directly to the FOIA office and cc: opendata@gsa.gov by the PDM or member of the DMWG.

· FOIA Officer will forward to OGC through the GSA FOIA system. OGC will coordinate with the GSA Privacy Officer.

· If OGC approves the dataset for release, then the PDM is notified by OGC. OGC closes out the FOIA entry.

· The PDM will prepare the datasets for release and notify the SSO data owners and DMWG.

**Access Level Determination**

Through consultation and coordination with the GSA FOIA office, OGC and Chief Privacy Officer, the decision was made to first use the GSA FOIA exceptions as a basis for initial access level determination. These FOIA exemptions are consistent governmentwide, not solely a GSA policy. Additional privacy analysis is performed within the FOIA, OGC and Chief Privacy offices to ensure Personal Identifiable Information (PII) is not disclosed through the release of a data asset, and that the “mosaic effect” will not create additional security and privacy concerns. The reviewers will document in the Enterprise Data Inventory the reasons for the restricted and private access level determinations.
#### Concepcion DOMENECH et al., Appellants, v. Arnold LOOMIS, Appellee.

No. 73-425.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 4, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





The Board of Directors
Downey Financial Corp.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements (No.
333-30483) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-50416) on Form S-3 of Downey Financial Corp.
of our report  dated  January 17,  2002,  relating to the  consolidated  balance
sheets of Downey  Financial  Corp.  as of December  31,  2001 and 2000,  and the
related consolidated statements of income,  comprehensive income,  stockholders'
equity  and cash  flows for each of the  years in the  three-year  period  ended
December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2001,  annual report
on Form 10-K of Downey Financial Corp.


                                /s/ KPMG LLP
                                ------------

Los Angeles, California
March 7, 2002
#### Melvin J. BLACKMAN, Jr, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42863.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 16, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 265 So.2d 734.

ROBERTS, C. J, and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ, concur.

BOYD and McCAIN, JJ, dissent.
I, Scott J. Sloane, Environmental Program Specialist III, of the Department of Environmental

Conservation, being sworn, state the following:As required by AS 44.62.190, notice of the proposed adoption of changes to 18 AAC 50.030 State air

quality control plan has been given by being:

(I) published in a newspaper or trade publication;(2) furnished to interested persons;(3) furnished to appropriate state officials;(4) furnished to the Department of Law, along with a copy of the proposed regulations;(5) electronically transmitted to incumbent State of Alaska legislators;(6) furnished to the Legislative Affairs Agency, Legislative Legal and Research Services;

(7) posted on the Alaska Online Public Notice System as required by AS 44.62.1 75(aX I) and (b)

and 44.62.I90(aXI); and

(8) furnished electronically, along with a copy of the proposed regulations, to the

Legislative Affairs Agency, the chair ofthe Resources Committee of the

Alaska Senate and House of Representatives, the Administrative Regulation Review

Committee, and the legislative council.

As required by AS 44.62.190(d), additional regulations notice information regarding the proposedadoption of the regulation changes described above has been furnished to interested persons and those in(5) and (6) of the list above. The additional regulations notice information also has been posted on the

Alaska Online Public Notice System.

DATE: uf /2,2°/I

Ju2au, Alaska

Scott J. SWai(EPS Ill

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this IZ’day of,9t2QL ,2L) (I.

(t167. rt7

[NOTARY SEAL] Notary PubI id’and for the

State of Alaska

STATE OF ALASKA My commission expires: tc) (1

OFFICIAL SEAL

Cassidy Y. Kearney

NOTARY PUBLIC

My CommissIon Expires With Office.
#### S. Fred SINGER, Appellant, v. The UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI, Appellee.

No. 70-1244.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 7, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Jack Falk, Judge.

Feibelman, Friedman, Britton .& Stettin and Alfred R. Camner, Miami, for appellant.

Mershon, Sawyer, Johnston, Dunwody & Cole and William J. Dunaj, Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the authority of Bryant v. Food Machinery and Chemical Corporation Niagara Chemical Div., Fla.App. 1961, 130 So.2d 132.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 29543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13541]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Advance Notification of Sunset Review; Correction

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

    Background: On June 1, 2018, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) 
published the July 2018 Advance Sunset Review Notice,\1\ in which 
Commerce inadvertently listed the initiation of Lemon Juice from 
Argentina (A-357-818) for July 2018. The sunset review of Lemon Juice 
from Argentina is not scheduled to be initiated in July 2018; the error 
was based on a former suspension agreement, which was superseded by a 
new agreement on October 26, 2016.\2\ This notice serves to correct the 
July 2018 Advance Sunset Review Notice. There will be no sunset reviews 
initiated in July 2018, because Lemon Juice from Argentina was the only 
case for which a sunset review was scheduled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 
Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Review, 83 
FR 25436 (June 1, 2018) (July 2018 Advance Sunset Review Notice).
    \2\ See Lemon Juice from Argentina: Continuation of Suspension 
of Antidumping Investigation, 81 FR 74395 (October 26, 2016).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Applicable (June 1, 2018).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD 
Operations, Customs and Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4735.
    This correction notice of initiation is being published in 
accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218 (c).

    Dated: June 20, 2018.
James Maeder,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2018-13541 Filed 6-22-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14262]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Charter Amendment of Department of Defense Federal Advisory 
Committees

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Amendment of federal advisory committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense (DoD) is publishing this notice to 
announce that it is amending the charter for the Defense Innovation 
Board (``the Board'').

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Freeman, Advisory Committee 
Management Officer for the Department of Defense, 703-692-5952.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board's charter is being amended in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) of 1972 (5 
U.S.C., Appendix, as amended) and 41 CFR 102-3.50(d). The DoD is 
amending the charter for the Board previously announced in the Federal 
Register on April 18, 2018 (83 FR 17153) to reflect a change in the 
committee's sponsor. The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and 
Engineering will be the sponsor for the Board. The amended charter and 
contact information for the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) can be 
obtained at http://www.facadatabase.gov/.

    Dated: June 28, 2018.
Shelly E. Finke,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2018-14262 Filed 7-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Broadband Networks, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Patrick Soon-Hock Lim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
-------------------------
Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
Chief Executive Officer
March 28, 2003


A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906 has
been provided to Digital Broadband Networks, Inc. and will be retained by
Digital Broadband Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OLIVERIO ORTEGA-SORIANO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-73460

Agency No. A078-101-921

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 21, 2015** 

Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Oliverio Ortega-Soriano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

FILED

SEP 25 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
the agency’s continuous physical presence determination, Gutierrez v. Mukasey,

521 F.3d 1114, 1116 (9th Cir. 2008), and review de novo questions of law,

Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the

petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that

Ortega-Soriano knowingly and voluntarily accepted administrative voluntary

departure in lieu of removal proceedings where the administrative voluntary

departure agreement, Form I-826, reflected that it was read to him in Spanish

before he signed it. See Gutierrez, 521 F.3d at 1117-18 (requiring some evidence

that the alien was informed of and accepted the terms of the voluntary departure

agreement); cf. Ibarra-Flores v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 614, 619-20 (9th Cir. 2006)

(insufficient evidence that alien knowingly and voluntarily accepted voluntary

departure where record did not contain Form I-826 and petitioner’s testimony

suggested that he accepted return due to misrepresentations by immigration

officers). The agency therefore properly concluded that, due to this voluntary

departure during the relevant ten year period, Ortega-Soriano did not meet the

continuous physical presence requirement for cancellation of removal. See 8

U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A); Vasquez-Lopez v. Ashcroft, 343 F.3d 961, 974 (9th Cir.

2003) (per curiam). 

2 13-73460
Ortega-Soriano’s claim that his right to due process was violated by the

events leading to his 2002 departure is not supported by the record. 

Padilla-Martinez v. Holder, 770 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2014) (“To prevail on a

due-process claim, a petitioner must demonstrate both a violation of rights and

prejudice.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 13-73460