alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on June 8, 2018, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), R Consortium, Inc. (“R Consortium”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Ketchum Trading LLC, Chicago, IL, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and R Consortium intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On September 15, 2015, R Consortium filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section                           ( print page 29825)                        6(b) of the Act on October 2, 2015 (80 FR 59815).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on December 21, 2016. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 31, 2017 (82 FR 8845).                

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2018-13673 Filed 6-25-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
#### Bruce A. LOMBARD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42263.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 19, 1972.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Verizon South Inc.



EXHIBIT 12





COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|(Dollars in Millions)                                                                            |  | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2003
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |  | $                                  
|Interest expense                                                                                 |  |                                    
|Portion of rent expense representing interest                                                    |  |                                    
|Amortization of capitalized interest                                                             |  |                                    
|                                                                                                 |  |                                    
|Earnings, as adjusted                                                                            |  | $                                  
|                                                                                                 |  |                                    
|                                                                                                 | 
|Fixed charges:                                                                                   |  |                                    
|Interest expense                                                                                 |  | $                                  
|Portion of rent expense representing interest                                                    |  |                                    
|Capitalized interest                                                                             |  |                                    
|                                                                                                 |  |                                    
|Fixed charges                                                                                    |  | $                                  
|                                                                                                 |  |                                    
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                               |  |                                    
|                                                                                                 |  |
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 388 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 141

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 388

                          [Report No. 103-436]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 3345) to amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate 
    certain restrictions on employee training; to provide temporary 
   authority to agencies relating to voluntary separation incentive 
                   payments; and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 16, 1994

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                 House Calendar No. 141
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 388

                          [Report No. 103-436]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 3345) to amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate 
    certain restrictions on employee training; to provide temporary 
   authority to agencies relating to voluntary separation incentive 
                   payments; and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 1994

   Mr. Moakley, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
  bill (H.R. 3345) to amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate 
    certain restrictions on employee training; to provide temporary 
   authority to agencies relating to voluntary separation incentive 
                   payments; and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
3345) to amend title 5, United States Code, to eliminate certain 
restrictions on employee training; to provide temporary authority to 
agencies relating to voluntary separation incentive payments; and for 
other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
```
#### GAS SERVICE CORP., etc., et al., Appellants, v. Paul R. STEARNS, etc., Appellee.

No. 70-551.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 20, 1971.

Rehearing Denied May 26, 1971.

Adams, George & Wood and David L. Willing, Miami, for appellants.

Dudziak, Dressier, Jaczynski, Gaer & Cunningham, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON C. J„ and HENDRY, J., and BALABAN, HENRY L., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Paikin v. Beach Cabs, Inc., Fla.App. 1966, 187 So.2d 93.
#### Commonwealth of Pennsylvania *v.*Buti, Appellant.

Argued May 7, 1934.

*386Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker, and James, JJ.

*Anne*X *Alpern,*for appellant.

*Earl R. Jackson,*Assistant District Attorney, and with him *A. T. Park,*District Attorney, for appellee.

July 13, 1934:

Opinion by

Trexler, P. J.,

The defendant was convicted upon an indictment charging him with arson. Motions for a new trial and arrest of judgment were refused, and this appeal followed.

The evidence offered was circumstantial, and the question before us is whether there was sufficient testimony to warrant conviction. It may be summarized as follows:

The defendant was in possession of the premises and had control of them, and spent some time in them several hour before the fire. At the time of the fire the doors and windows of the house were barricaded, an electric fan was in such a position that a jury could believe that it had been used to stir the blaze; photographic film of celluloid, an inflammable material, was strewn over the house from the seat of the blaze to other rooms and were tied together by twine and *387this showed great care in the preparation so’ that if once a blaze came up it would travel; rags soaked with turpentine were found at the place where the fire started and three other places, some being pushed between the plaster and the wall. In addition to these facts it developed that the defendant carried both property and household goods insurance, and he would have profited by the destruction of them. At the time the fire was discovered, neither the defendant nor any of his family were at the house, but were at a friend’s home about one mile away. The defendant hurt his case by statements inconsistent with subsequent declarations when he returned to his home after the fire. He stated to the police he had not been home since seven o’clock that morning and that he had sent his son home to fix the fire. At the trial he testified that he was home from 6:30 in the evening until 8 P. M. The fire occurring at approximately 11:30 P. M. When he appeared upon the scene he gave no evidence of excitement, but was calm. The fire was, no doubt, of an incendiary character.

The case of Commonwealth v. Pane, 110 Pa. Superior Ct. 367, 168 A. 510, cited by the appellant differs materialy from the present. In that case it appeared that the defendant did not have any interest in any insurance on the building that might have been placed upon it. Each case must be decided on its own facts. Considering all the testimony we think the conclusion reached by the jury was justified by the evidence produced.

The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted to the court below and it is ordered that the defendant appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence or any part of it which had not been performed at the time the appeal in this case was made a supersedeas.
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic 

Conferences of the International Air 

Transport Association 

OST-2011- OO? / 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

lATA AGREEMENT APPROVED & IMMUNIZED A . 

DOCKET OST-J:!;fi,._ajttL. ^ / r .: '• \TE /' ^ ^^/ ^ ^ // 

This appro va'. nv.i :?,vrv. or^'itiirn:.; iiv:r.., • :ct, where applicable, 

tocondji'ons !) c>':r.;:;:v ;;v:; OLJCI. 

This ^.c'j.i.n ;; J:;";.:'i\i- lii ji 7 dnys ii-ih:.: n / ::.'••"! ';: iiicd i;n(ier 

14 Cl-k 383 J o ?ra,i..v.-rv.' is i.:rs;le:;^;,';;; oi- 'i'.; tJc,_:::. ••.;h!'s oivn motion 

In view ol the :;i/.-,oc;riirit'.s ncicontrcvcisirJ lUauro a;;i.i li;c availability ot 

the above prpetitiurs, the 21-diiy period in 14,Ci>R 303.42 is waived. 

Rv- ^ 7f^«- M /^ T /" ^ z.a^t y 

tor. Office of International Aviation 

5 May 2011 

Communications with respect to 

this document should be sent to 

Douglas E. Lavin 

Regional Vice President - North America 

International Air Transport Association 

1776 K.St.N.W. #12* Floor 

Washington DC 20006
August 14, 2015

Mr. Robert Buhrow

Peninsular Aerial Services, LLC

2445 Pimlico Lane

Melbourne, FL 32934

Dear Mr. Buhrow:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2) and 

91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we 

cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your May 5, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Peninsular Aerial Services, 

LLC into the public docket (No. FAA−2015−1699), but we are unable to process your request 

any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 

(copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the 

following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ORBIT
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              20
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    20
<PP&E>                                             335
<DEPRECIATION>                                     295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,610
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           325
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,802)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       133
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     7
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (877)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (877)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (877)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  $(0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(0.03)
        

</TABLE>
### ATTACHMENT **F Work She**  **ets used to Calculate Respondent Labor Costs**  This attachment is available as part of the electronic **docket EPA -** **HQ -**  **OPP -** **2013 -**  **0 742**  and is part of the ICR’s Supporting Statement . **Respondent Labor Costs Item**  **Formula Labor Category** **2** 

### Managerial **Technical Clerical**  Unloaded Hourly Rate 1 = W $54.34 $28.88 $17.23 

### Benefits Percentage 3 Lb = B/W 44.6% 44.6% 44.6% 

### Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $24.24 $12.88 $7.68 

### Loaded Hourly Rate Wb = W+B = W(1+Lb) $78.58 $41.76 $24.91 

### Overhead Percentage 4 Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50% 

### Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo $39.29 $20.88 $12.46 

### Fully Loaded Hourly Rate Wf = Wb+ OH = W+B+ OH $117.86 $62.64 $37.37 1. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, NAICS 325300

– Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing, May 2012, http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_325300.htm 2. Standard Occupati onal Codes: Management: 11 - 0000, Management Occupations Technical: 19 - 0000, Life Physical, and Social Science Occupations Clerical: 43 - 0000, Office and Administrative Support Occupations 3. Total benefits/wages based on June 2013 Employer costs for employee compensation, All Civilian nonfarm workers, ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/ocwc/ect/ececqrtn.pdf 

### 4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition , EPA -452 - 02 - 001, January 2002, pp . 2 - 34. The loading for indirect costs is within the range of 20 - 70% of the loaded labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.

### Work Sheets used to Calculate EPA and Federal Government **Labor Costs**

This attachment is available as part of the electronic **docket EPA -** **HQ -**  **OPP -** **2013 -**  **0742** and is part of the ICR’s Supporting Statement **EPA and Federal Government Labor Costs Item**  **Formula Labor Category** **2** 

### Managerial **Technical Clerical**  Unloaded Hourly Rate 1 = W $55.66 $36.11 $20.59 

### Benefits Percentage 3 Lb = B/W 44.6% 44.6% 44.6% 

### Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $24.82 $16.11 $9.18 

### Loaded Hourly Rate Wb = W+B = W(1+Lb) $80.48 $52.22 $29.77 

### Overhead Percentage 4 Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50% 

### Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo $40.24 $26.11 $14.89 

### Fully Loaded Hourly Rate Wf = Wb +OH = W+B+ OH $120.73 $78.32 $44.66 1. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, NAICS 999100

– Federal Executive Branch, May 2012, http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_999100.htm 2. Standard Occupational Codes: Management: 11 - 0000, Management Occupations Technical: 19 - 0000, Life Physical, and Social Science Occupations Clerical: 43 - 0000, Office and Administrative Support Occupations 3. Total benefits/wages based on June 2013 Employer costs for employee compensation, All Civilian nonfarm workers, ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/ocwc/ect/ececqrtn.pdf 

### 4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition , EPA -452 - 02 - 001, January 2002 , pp. 2 - 34. The loading for indirect costs is within the range of 20 - 70% of the loaded labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.
[No. 501-2.

Division Two.

March 8, 1972.]

#### Peninsula Fuel Company, *Appellant,*v. Ronald L. Dotson *et al., Respondents.*
257 La. 855

#### Theodule VIDRINE v. MICHIGAN MILLERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 51135.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1971.

In re: Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. 242 So.2d 249.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### THE STATE *vs.*NEAL McGONIGAL.

Drunkenness as a defence.

Indicted for larceny.

The defence was, that the prisoner was so drunk as to render him irresponsible.

Judge Wootten

charged the jury, that drunkenness was no excuse or palliation for a crime; but drunkenness long continued produces the disease of mania a potu, which deprives the party of reason, and incapacitates, him from distinguishing between right and wrong. In this stage it becomes a kind of insanity. The jury woujd have to distinguish between the mere phrenzy of drunkenness, and the fixed insanity produced by continued dissipation. If the prisoner was in the latter condition, he could not be held responsible, otherwise he ought to be convicted. Verdict not guilty.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Western Power Equipment Corp, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Repost"), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
          Securities Exchange Act o f1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"),
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange
          Act; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ C. Dean McLain
------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and President
September 28, 2005
254 La. 779

#### Thomas Edward HAIRE v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY v. Gayle SMITH et al.

No. 50006.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 8, 1969.

In re: Gayle Smith and Allstate Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster. 224 So.2d 531, 224 So.2d 536.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.