alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Brian C. Smith Jr.

SHERMAN UAS

5 Locust Lane Sherman, CT 06784

860

- 350

- 2473

January 21, 2016

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington , DC 20590

RE: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b) ; 14 CFR Part 21 ; 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b); 91.7 (a) ; 91.9 (b) (2) ; 91.103 (b); 91.109 ; 91.119 ; 91.121; 91.151(a) ; 91.203 (a) & (b) ; 91.405 (a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2) ; 91.417 (a) & (b)

.

Dear Sir or Madam:

I tried to upload the Operators manual for the DJI Phantom 3 Professional as part of my 333 exemption package. The file size is 13.2 Mb and will not upload to the Regulations.gov website as it’s too large.

The operator’s manual for the DJI Phantom 3 Professional as well as the quick start manual are

available online at http://www.dji.com/product/phantom

- 3/download

.

If you have any questions, please contact me at the information above.

S i ncerely,

Brian C. Smith Jr.
H. Res. 264

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

October 14, 1993.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2351) to authorize appropriations for fiscal

years 1994 and 1995 to carry out the National Foundation

on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, and the Museum Services Act. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

on Education and Labor. After general debate the bill shall

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The

bill shall be considered as read. No amendment to the bill

shall be in order except those printed in the report of the

Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each

amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the

report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the
2

HRES 264 EH

report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the

time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by

the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the

Whole. Points of order against the amendments printed in

the report for failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XVI are

waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for

amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to

the House with such amendments as may have been adopted.

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the

bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### VICO CONCRETE COMPANY, INC. v. Guy ANTLEY.

No. 54138.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1973.

In re: Guy W. Antley applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Ouachi-ta. 283 So.2d 830.

Writ denied. The result is correct.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.2(a)


                               AMENDMENT TO THE
                                   BYLAWS OF
                           DATASTREAM SYSTEMS, INC.

     Article III, Section 3.7 of the Bylaws of Datastream Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") is hereby amended by deleting such Section 3.7 in its entirety and
replacing it with the following:

          3.7  Action Without Meetings.  Any action required or
               -----------------------
          permitted to be taken at any meeting of the Board of
          Directors or any committee thereof may be taken without
          a meeting if all members of the Board of Directors or
          such committee, as the case may be, consent thereto in
          writing, or by electronic transmission (including email
          transmissions), and the writing or writings or electronic
          transmission or transmissions are filed with the minutes
          of proceedings of the Board of Directors or such committee.
          Such filing shall be in paper form if the minutes are
          maintained in paper form and shall be in electronic form
          if the minutes are maintained in electronic form."

     This amendment to the Bylaws was authorized by the affirmative vote of a
majority of the directors of the Company on March 16, 2001.

                                    DATASTREAM SYSTEMS, INC.



Date: March 22, 2001                By: /s/ Larry G. Blackwell
     ---------------                   ---------------------------
                                        Mr. Larry G. Blackwell
                                        Chairman of the Board and
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                    ATTEST:



Date: March 22, 2001                    /s/ C. Alex Estevez
     ---------------                ------------------------------
                                        C. Alex Estevez
                                        Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 309 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 309

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a two-
  thirds, rollcall vote to increase the statutory limit on the public 
                                 debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 10, 1993

Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself and Mr. Hall of Texas) submitted 
 the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a two-
  thirds, rollcall vote to increase the statutory limit on the public 
                                 debt.

    Resolved, That rule XLIX of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended to read as follows:

                              ``rule xlii

          ``increasing the statutory limit on the public debt

    ``1. It shall not be in order to pass or adopt, as the case may be, 
any bill or joint resolution, or conference report thereon, increasing 
the statutory limit on the public debt except--
            ``(1) by a rollcall vote, and the yeas and nays shall be 
        considered as ordered; and
            ``(2) upon the affirmative vote of two-thirds of those 
        voting, a quorum being present.
    ``2. The House may waive the provisions of clause 1 for any fiscal 
year during which a declaration of war is in effect.''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 257 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 257

Providing for the consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 38) 
 proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
 respect to the number of terms of office of Members of the Senate and 
                     the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 1993

Mr. McCollum submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 38) 
 proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with 
 respect to the number of terms of office of Members of the Senate and 
                     the House of Representatives.

    Resolved, That immediately after the adoption of this resolution 
the House shall resolve itself into the Committee of the Whole House on 
the state of the Union for the consideration of the joint resolution 
(H.J. Res. 38) proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 
States with respect to the number of terms of office of Members of the 
Senate and the House of Representatives, and the first reading of the 
joint resolution shall be dispensed with. After general debate which 
shall be confined to the joint resolution and which shall not exceed 
six hours to be equally divided and controlled by Representative 
McCollum of Florida, or a designee, and a Member opposed thereto, the 
joint resolution shall be considered for amendment under the five-
minute rule. At the conclusion of the consideration of the joint 
resolution for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the joint 
resolution to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted, 
and the previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 
resolution and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except one motion to recommit.

                                 <all>
```
#### WATSCO, INC., etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Melvin KOENIG and Pearl Koenig, Respondents.

No. 42237.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 13, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 261 So.2d 851.

ROBERTS, C. J„ and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
| (1)  | The      report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                            |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      registrant. |

| November      2, 2009                                 |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                  |   |
|                                                  |   |
| /s/      Michael A. Neal                              |   |
| Michael      A. NealChief      Executive Officer      |   |
|                                                  |   |
| /s/      Jeffrey S. Bornstein                         |   |
| Jeffrey      S. BornsteinChief      Financial Officer |   |
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Renell A. VaSALLE.

No. 54241.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 4, 1974.

In re: Renell A. VaSalle applying for Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition and/or mandamus.

Not considered. Relator has an adequate remedy for review in the event of conviction.

SANDERS, C. J., is also of the opinion that the ruling of the trial judge is correct on the merits.
#### Leonard Robert SELFRIDGE, Jr., Petitioner, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Respondent.

No. 70-302.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 8, 1970.

Certiorari dismissed.
#### GORDON THOMPSON CHEVROLET, INC., a corporation, Appellant, v. Starling J. GARMON, Appellee.

No. N-318.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 5, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 2, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
Officers Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) I, Allan Silber, Chief Executive Officer of Counsel Corporation, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Counsel
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls procedures (as defined
in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and
have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any changes in the companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control
over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the
Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management of other employees who have a significant role in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date:
    
    June 17, 2004
    
    

/s/ Allan SilberAllan SilberChief Executive Officer
 12.1
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 293

_____________________________
N ATHANIEL S TEWART , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , D EPT

. OF C ORRECTIONS , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Karen Gievers , Judge

. March 29, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , W INOKUR , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Nathaniel Stewart, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee; Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Gayla Grant, Assis tant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections
, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### H. B. MEISELMAN, Petitioner, v. SEMINOLE DRUG CORPORATION, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 42389.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 19, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 260 So.2d 226.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 382

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 65) to amend title 10,

United States Code, to permit retired members of the Armed Forces

who have a service-connected disability to receive military retired pay

concurrently with veterans’ disability compensation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 9, 1994

Mr. BILIRAKIS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 65) to

amend title 10, United States Code, to permit retired

members of the Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability to receive military retired pay concurrently with veterans’ disability compensation.

1 Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this

2 resolution the House shall resolve itself into the Commit3 tee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for the

4 consideration of the bill (H.R. 65) to amend title 10, Unit5 ed States Code, to permit retired members of the Armed

6 Forces who have a service-connected disability to receive

7 retired pay concurrently with veterans’ disability com-
2

HRES 382 IH

1 pensation, and the first reading of the bill shall be dis2 pensed with. All points of order against the bill and

3 against its consideration are waived. After general debate

4 which shall not exceed one hour equally divided and con5 trolled by Representative Bilirakis of Florida and the

6 chairman of the Committee on Armed Services, or their

7 designees, the bill shall be considered as having been read

8 for amendment under the five-minute rule. No amendment

9 to the bill shall be in order except one amendment by, and

10 if ordered by, Representative Bilirakis, or a designee, said

11 amendment shall be considered as read, shall not be sub12 ject to further amendment but shall be debatable for not

13 a exceed one-hour to be equally divided and controlled by

14 the proponent and an opponent, and all points of order

15 against the amendment are waived.

16 If on any day the Committee of the Whole rises and

17 reports that it has come to no resolution on the bill, then

18 on the next legislative day the House shall, immediately

19 after the approval of the Journal, resolve into the Commit20 tee of the Whole for further consideration of the bill.

21 At the conclusion of the consideration of the bill for

22 amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

23 to the House with such amendment as may have been

24 adopted. The previous question shall be considered as or25 dered on the bill and any amendment thereto to final pas-
3

HRES 382 IH

1 sage without intervening motion except one motion to re2 commit, with or without instructions.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-18-029]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

 United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

 June 28, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

 Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

 Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        1.                         *Agendas for future meetings:*                         None.                    

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote on Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1369-1372 (Final) (Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from China, India, Korea, and Taiwan). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission by July 13, 2018.

                        5.                         *Outstanding action jackets:*                         None.                    

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: June 19, 2018.

William Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-13528 Filed 6-20-18; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### John B. HUFSTETLER, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Respondent.

No. 70-894.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 16, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
# C_2020095EN.01004301.xml

| 23.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/43

---

Action brought on 4 February 2020 — Hauz 1929 v EUIPO — Houzz (HAUZ LONDON)

(Case T-66/20)

(2020/C 95/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hauz 1929 Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: N. Lyberis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Houzz, Inc. (Palo Alto, California, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark HAUZ LONDON — Application for registration No 17 593 823

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 November 2019 in Case R 884/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | partially annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

partially annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the applicant in the present proceedings, including those incurred before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the applicant in the present proceedings, including those incurred before EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# Official Journal C 147A/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 147A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4923 June 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 147A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4923 June 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 147A/1 | Internal Market and Services Directorate-General — Publication of a vacancy for a Director-General (Grade AD15) — COM/2006/10028 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Commission

2006/C 147A/1

Internal Market and Services Directorate-General — Publication of a vacancy for a Director-General (Grade AD15) — COM/2006/10028

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Henry J. CONNOR, Appellant, v. Leeaine WATSON et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1258.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 29, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Etheria Verdell JACKSON, Appellee.

No. GG-376.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 14, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 16, 1977.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Donald G. Nichols, of Dawson, Galant, Maddox, Sulik & Nichols, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

When we consider the evidence on the question of the voluntariness of the statements and admissions of appellee in the light most favorable to appellee, which we must do, we find no error in the trial court granting the motion to suppress same.

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.