alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex-10.30

   
 LOAN
 AGREEMENT
 September 2, 2020
  
 Rain Communications Corp. (the “Lender”) with an address at 1130 West Pender Street, Unit 820, Vancouver, BC V6E 4A4, advanced USD$6,000 (the “Principal Sum”) to Cell MedX Corp. (the “Borrower”) of 123 W. Nye Ln, Suite 446, Carson City, NV 89706. The Lender advanced the funds on September 2, 2020.
  
 The Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 6% per year (the “Interest”) calculated from September 2, 2020 (the “Effective Date”). The Borrower is liable for repayment of the Principal Sum, accrued Interest, and any additional costs that the Lender incurs in trying to collect the amount owed to him under the terms of this Loan Agreement.
  
 The Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.
  
 	 LENDER
	 BORROWER

	 Rain Communications Corp.
	 Cell MedX Corp.

	  
	  

	 Per:
	 Per:

	  
	  

	  
	  

	 /s/ Raph Biggar
	 /s/  Yanika Silina

	 Raph Biggar, President
	 Yanika Silina, CFO


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
 PROMISSORY NOTE
  
 	 Principal Amount: USD$6,000
	 September 2, 2020


  
  
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED Cell MedX Corp., (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to the order of Rain Communications Corp. (the “Lender”) the sum of $6,000 lawful money of the United States of America (the “Principal Sum”) together with the Interest accrued on the Principal Sum calculated from September 2, 2020 (“Effective Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate as defined below.
  
 For the purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 6 per cent per year. Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective rate of 6.2% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.
  
 The Borrower may repay the Principal Sum, and the Interest in whole or in part at any time.
  
 The Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour of this promissory note.
  
  
 BORROWER
 Cell MedX Corp.
  
 Per:
  
  
 /s/ Yanika Silina
 Yanika Silina, CFO
EXHIBIT 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, Theodore R. Sanders, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of PC Mall, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 27, 2006 |  | /s/ Theodore R. Sanders
|                     |  | Theodore R. Sanders    
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Tyronne PARKER and Leonard Foster.

No. 61404.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 19, 1978.

John M. Lawrence, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for Tyronne Parker.

Dean A. Andrews, Jr., New Orleans, for Leonard Foster.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendants Tyronne Parker and Leonard Foster were charged by bill of information with armed robbery of Paulette and Frank Stewart. Parker and Foster were tried jointly before a jury, found guilty, and each was sentenced to 50 years at hard labor on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. Defendant Parker relies on twelve assignments of error for reversal of his conviction; Foster relies on one assignment.

All of the assignments are without merit.

*Decree*

Accordingly we affirm defendant’s convictions and sentences.

AFFIRMED.

SUMMERS, J., concurs.
# L_2006364EN.01S00301.xml

| 20.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 364/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 364/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

From 1 January 2007, the structure of the Official Journal will be modified in the direction of a clearer classification of the acts published which preserves, nevertheless, essential continuity.

The new structure, with examples illustrating its use in the classification of acts, can be consulted on the EUR-Lex site on the following address:

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm

---
#### BORG-WARNER ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Howard C. BEACH and Beach’s Siesta Key Marine, Inc., Appellees.

No. 72-857.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 20, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 FOR 10-KSB OF CSB FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             763
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             779
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     16,931
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             215
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               215
<LOANS>                                         26,282
<ALLOWANCE>                                        171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,423
<DEPOSITS>                                      35,855
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                169
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  46,423
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,187
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,041
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    76
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,304
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,638
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,638
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,666
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       63
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    464
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         345
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       345
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.74
<LOANS-NON>                                        410
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   165
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       61
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  171
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               171
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
[No. 506-3.

Division Three.

May 15, 1972.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Robert J. Stevens, *Appellant.*
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 328

Expressing the condolences of the House on the death of Representative

Thomas P. ‘‘Tip’’ O’Neill, Jr.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 25, 1994

Mr. MOAKLEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to.

RESOLUTION

Expressing the condolences of the House on the death of

Representative Thomas P. ‘‘Tip’’ O’Neill, Jr.

1 Resolved, That the House has learned with profound

2 sorrow of the death of the Honorable Thomas P. ‘‘Tip’’

3 O’Neill, Jr., former Member of the House for 17 terms

4 and Speaker of the House of Representatives for the Nine5 ty-fifth, Ninety-sixth, Ninety-seventh, Ninety-eighth and

6 Ninety-ninth Congresses.

7 Resolved, That in the death of the Honorable Thomas

8 P. ‘‘Tip’’ O’Neill, Jr. the United States and the Common9 wealth of Massachusetts have lost a valued and eminent

10 public servant and citizen.
2

HRES 328 ATH

1 Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolu2 tions to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the

3 family of the deceased.

4 Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it ad5 journ as a further mark of respect to the memory of the

6 deceased.

Æ
#### SCHOOL BOARD OF MARION COUNTY, Florida, Petitioner, v. Ida L. HIPPERLING and Division of Employment Security, Florida Department of Commerce, Respondents.

No. DD-469.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 13, 1977.

*1183John P. McKeever, of Pattillo, MacKay & McKeever, Ocala, for petitioner.

Kenneth Hart and Alex D. Littlefield, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for writ of certiorari denied.

RAWLS, Acting C. J, and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
#### Robert Casimiro RUMORE, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42386.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 18, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 260 So.2d 877.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, Mc-CAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ„ dissent.
Exhibit 10.5(d)

 

Exercise of Option To
 Purchase Shares

 

To:          ANGION BIOMEDICA CORP.

 

The undersigned hereby irrevocably exercises a Stock Option for the purchase of [      ] shares (the “Shares”) of Common Stock of Angion Biomedica Corp. (the “Company”) granted under its 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, and evidenced by Stock Option Certificate No. [      ] 2015-[   ], dated [      ].

 

The undersigned herewith makes payment of the purchase price for the Shares in the amount of $[      ] [the number of Shares written above multiplied by the exercise price of $[      ] per Option Share] by one of the following choices (please initial the desired choice):

 

o ( i) delivery of cash or a check payable to the order of Angion Biomedica Corp.;

 

o (ii)* delivery of shares of Common Stock held for at least six months (if required to avoid negative accounting treatment) having a Fair Market Value (as defined in the Plan) equal as of the date of exercise to the aggregate cash exercise price for the Shares as to which the Option is being exercised;

 

o (iii)* having the Company retain from the Shares otherwise issuable upon exercise of the Option, a number of Shares having a Fair Market Value equal as of the date of exercise to the aggregate exercise price for the number of Shares as to which the Option is being exercised; or

 

o (iv)* in accordance with a cashless exercise program established with a securities brokerage firm and approved by the Administrator.

 

*These choices are subject to (a) the discretion of the Administrator and (b) at the time of exercise, the Common Stock is listed on a national securities exchange or traded in the U.S. over-the counter market.

 

As part of this Option exercise, and as a condition to the delivery of the stock certificate for the Shares, the undersigned agrees to become a party to a Stockholders Agreement covering the rights and obligations of certain holders of the Common Stock, which Agreement shall be in the form presented by the Company.  In the event the Shares are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the undersigned shall provide such representations as may be required by the Company to fulfill any exemptions that may be sought from registration under said Act, and the undersigned acknowledges the resale restrictions on the Shares imposed by said Act and that the certificates representing the Shares may include legends thereon reflecting such resale restrictions and as set forth in the Plan.

 

Kindly issue the stock certificate for the Shares in accordance with the instructions given below:

 

1











	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Print   name
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Signature
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Instructions   for issuance of stock:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Address
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Social   Security Number
    	
 
    	
 
    
					


 

2
#### Robert GISSENDANNER, Samuel Choice and John Forest Smalley, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2225.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 5, 1969.

Rehearings Denied Dec. 2, 1969.

J. Leonard Fleet, of Fuer, Fleet & Abram, Hollywood, for appellants.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James M. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed. Callendar v. State, Fla.1966, 181 So.2d 529.

CROSS, C. J., and WALDEN and Mc-CAIN, JJ., concur.
#### Sylvia SALAS and Ramon Salas, individually, and as Guardian of Sylvia Salas, a minor, Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-792.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 27, 1971.

Rehearing Denied May 26, 1971.

Gaine & Gaine, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellants.

Richard E. Hardwick, Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellee.

*529Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

HENDRY, Judge.

The appellant-defendants, the Salas’, seek review of an adverse final summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff-ap-pellee Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company in its declaratory judgment action to determine rights under an automobile insurance policy.

The appellants generally contend that the “family-household” exclusion is contrary to the purpose of § 627.0851, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. We reject this contention and affirm the judgment.

Two automobiles collided near an intersection leading to the parking area of Crandon Park. Appellant Sylvia Salas was riding as a passenger in an uninsured automobile owned and operated by her brother, Raymond Salas, Jr. The other car was owned by Marian C. Kees and was operated by Richard Kees; the Kees’ vehicle was insured by Allstate Insurance Company.

Sylvia Salas, a minor, and her brother are both residents in the household of their father, appellant Raymond Salas. Their father is the named insured in a policy issued by appellee-Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company. The policy contains uninsured motorist coverage, but contains the following limitation:

> “This policy does not apply: * * * Under the Uninsured Motorists Coverage,

> “(q) to bodily injury to an insured while occupying a highway vehicle (other than an insured automobile) owned by the named insured or by any person resident in the same household who is related to the named insured by blood, marriage or adoption, or through being struck by such a vehicle

The minor appellant, Sylvia Salas, made a claim under the uninsured motorist provision of the policy, alleging gross negligence on the part of her brother, the owner-operator of the vehicle in which she was a passenger. An arbitration hearing was scheduled, and then appellee filed the present complaint for a declaratory decree, alleging that it was not liable under the uninsured motorist provision containing a “family-household” exclusion.

While certain exclusions from uninsured motorist coverage have been struck down, nevertheless “family-household” exclusions of this type have been upheld by this court. National Union Indemnity Company v. Hodges, Fla.App.1970, 238 So.2d 673.

We think the trial court was correct in refusing to strike down the “family-household” exclusion in question.

Therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.
# C_2020390EN.01004001.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/40

---

Action brought on 15 September 2020 — Cara Therapeutics v EUIPO — Gebro Holding (KORSUVA)

(Case T-584/20)

(2020/C 390/57)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Cara Therapeutics, Inc. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented by: J. Day, Solicitor and T. de Haan, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gebro Holding GmbH (Fieberbrunn, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark KORSUVA — Application for registration No 17 816 844

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 July 2020 in Case R 2450/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | uphold the decision of the Opposition Division of 27 January 2018 in Opposition No B 002437922; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the decision of the Opposition Division of 27 January 2018 in Opposition No B 002437922;

| — | allow the contested application to proceed to registration; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the contested application to proceed to registration;

| — | order EUIPO and Gebro Holdings GmbH to bear their own costs and pay those of the Applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and Gebro Holdings GmbH to bear their own costs and pay those of the Applicant.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.47
                                  [LETTERHEAD]



Direct Tel: 0181 873 5455
Direct Fax: 0181 873 5256


Mr Jeff Henry
Silverwood
9 Fairmile Lane
Cobham
Surrey
KT11 2DL
                                                                 16th April 1996

Dear Jeff,

I refer to our recent discussions and now write to confirm, consistent with
those discussions, that your employment with NYNEX CableComms Limited (the
"Company") will cease, effective 30th April 1996.

In consideration of the Company's treatment of your leaving as being by reason
of "redundancy" (for purposes only of your retaining certain rights under the
Company's Inland Revenue Approved Employee Share Option Plan), you have agreed
that such consideration shall be in full and final settlement of all and any
claims, whether contractual, statutory or otherwise, that you may have against
the Company and any of its employees or any other Company within the NYNEX
Group relating to your employment or cessation of your employment including,
without limitation, any claims for notice or other payments under any contract,
agreement, understanding or policy.

Please confirm your agreement to the terms of this letter by signing and
returning a copy of this letter to me.

Thank you for your contributions to the business during your tenure, and all
the best in your future endeavours.

Yours sincerely,


/s/      John F. Killian
------------------------------------
         JOHN F. KILLIAN
President and Chief Executive Officer


AGREED:

     Signed  /s/     Jeff Henry
           -------------------------------------

     Dated -------------------------------------
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 20 2 3

- 0685 LT Case No. 202 0

- 102141

- CFDL

_____________________________
J ASON R ASHARD E DWARDS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County

. James R. Clayton , Judge

. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Victoria Rose Cordero
, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell E. Sanders , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee

.

May 14, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.

L AMBERT , E ISNAUGLE , and S OUD , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 29136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13528]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-18-029]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE:  June 28, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE:  Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS:  Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Agendas for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Vote on Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1369-1372 (Final) (Fine Denier 
Polyester Staple Fiber from China, India, Korea, and Taiwan). The 
Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its 
determinations and views of the Commission by July 13, 2018.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: June 19, 2018.
William Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-13528 Filed 6-20-18; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P