alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### David E. GARNETT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. P-239.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 24, 1971.

David E. Garnett, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William W. Herring, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus the respondent, State of Florida, has filed its Return reflecting, inter alia: That on June 17, 1968, Petitioner was found guilty by jury trial on two counts of armed robbery; that the trial court withheld adjudication of guilt and placed Petitioner on three years’ probation, on March 11, 1971, Petitioner’s probation was revoked upon a plea of guilty to violation of probation; and on March 25, 1971, a revocation order was entered. Concurrently therewith the Public Defender for the Second Judicial Circuit was designated to handle any appeal. Presumably, the adjudication of guilt was rendered by the trial court on March 11, 1971. The Public Defender has filed an appeal in this court on behalf of Petitioner docketed in Case No. P-95 reflecting that adjudication of guilt was withheld and that defendant pled guilty to violation of probation. It is presumed that the Public Defender will pursue a direct appeal from the adjudication of guilt rendered on March 11, 1971.

In view of the foregoing, the instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/31 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 305 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 305

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 15, 1993.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2401) to authorize 
appropriations for fiscal year 1994 for military activities of the Department of 
Defense, to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year 1994, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against 
its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EX-10.7






 Apria, Inc. has requested confidential treatment of this registration statement and
associated correspondence 
 pursuant to Rule 83 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

 Exhibit 10.7 

December 5, 2012 
 Daniel J. Starck 

19 Pegasus Dr. 
 Coto De Caza, CA 92679 

 

	 	Re:	 Amendment of Executive Employment Agreement 



Dear Dan: 
 This letter confirms the amendment,
as set forth below, of your Executive Employment Agreement, dated 3/14/2012, with Apria Healthcare Group Inc. (the “Severance Agreement”). 

In the event that you become entitled to severance pay pursuant to Section 4(a) of the Severance Agreement and the timing of your
delivery of the release of claims (as contemplated by Sections 4(a)and 4(d) of the Severance Agreement) could cause the severance pay installments to commence in either of two calendar years, such installments shall commence in the second of those
two years but shall otherwise be paid in accordance with the Severance Agreement. 
 Except as expressly provided in the preceding
paragraph, your Severance Agreement continues in effect in accordance with its terms. This letter shall be construed and interpreted consistent with Section 11(a) of the Severance Agreement. 

 

	
	Apria Healthcare Group Inc.
	
	/s/ Robert S. Holcombe
	By: Robert S. Holcombe
	Title: EVP, General Counsel & Secretary


  

	
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
	
	/s/ Daniel J. Starck
	Daniel J. Starck
#### ALLEN *v.*STATE

[No. 164,

September Term, 1962.]

*Decided February 5, 1963.*

The cause was argued before Bruñe, C. J., and Henderson, Hammond, Horney and Sybert, JJ.

*W. A. C. Hughes, Jr.,*for the appellant.

*Robert C. Murphy, Deputy Attorney General,*with whom were *Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, William J. O’Donnell, State’s Attorney for Baltimore City,*and *George J. He*
      *534
      *linski, Assistant State’s Attorney,*on the brief, for the appellee.

PER Curiam.

The defendant appeals from a conviction of first degree murder, without capital punishment, and the sentence of life imprisonment prescribed therefor by statute. He contends that he, as well as the deceased, had been drinking heavily on the night of the shooting and that he was consequently incapable of the premeditation which must be proven in order to sustain a charge of first degree murder.

There is evidence that the defendant and the deceased had had some words earlier in the evening while they were at a tavern, that the defendant left, went to his home, got a small pistol, returned to the tavern, called the deceased outside and shot him twice, and then went home and to bed. The defendant showed that he was an epileptic and he also claimed that he acted in self-defense.

The trial judge, before whom the defendant was tried without a jury, found on the basis of a medical report that epilepsy played no primary role in the affair and that the defendant was mentally responsible. He also considered and rejected the defense of self-defense. We find no basis upon which to overturn his findings of fact. In *Armstead v. State,*227 Md. 73, 175 A. 2d 24, which was also a first degree murder case in which the defendant suffered from epilepsy and had been drinking heavily, this court refused to adopt the so-called diminished responsibility rule. We think that the *Armstead*case is controlling here.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### MEDICAL HEALTH INDUSTRIES OF FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Emmett S. ROBERTS, as Secretary, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, State of Florida, and E. Douglas Endsley, as Director, Division of Family Services, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, State of Florida, Appellees.

No. T-468.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 27, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed is affirmed and appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  828,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                    43,300
<INVENTORY>                                     47,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,086,000
<PP&E>                                       9,589,700
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,353,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,363,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,139,600
<BONDS>                                      1,770,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,100
<PREFERRED>                                     15,200
<COMMON>                                       978,300
<OTHER-SE>                                     592,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,363,900
<SALES>                                      1,562,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,562,500
<CGS>                                          496,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,007,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                475,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                   180,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            295,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   295,600
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Civil Rights Commission

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of commission telephonic business meeting.

# DATES:

Tuesday, June 26, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. ET.

# ADDRESSES:

Meeting to take place by telephone.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Brian Walch, (202) 376-8371,                         *publicaffairs@usccr.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This business meeting is open to the public by telephone only.

*Participant Access Instructions:*                     Listen Only, Toll Free: 1-888-601-3878, Conference ID: 656-3687. Please dial in 5-10 minutes prior to the start time.                

## Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Program Planning
    - Discussion and Vote on 2018 Report: An Assessment of Minority Voting Rights Access in the United States

II. Adjourn Meeting

Dated: June 20, 2018.

Brian Walch,

Director, Communications and Public Engagement.

[FR Doc. 2018-13527 Filed 6-20-18; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
#### INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. Robert BROWN, Appellee.

No. J-137.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Oct. 5, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 31, 1967.

Isler & Welch, Panama City, for appellant.

Robert B. Staats, Panama City, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed. Rule 4.2, subd. a, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Ernesto S. Clarke, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

[654 NYS2d 475]

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1984 and was also admitted in the *731District of Columbia. He was disbarred by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals by decision and order dated November 7, 1996.

Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves for an order imposing reciprocal discipline upon respondent pursuant to our rules (22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has made no reply to the motion.

It appears from the decision of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals that respondent violated several disciplinary rules by, *inter alia,*misappropriating funds to his own personal use which belonged to his client and her physician.

In view of respondent’s disbarment in the District of Columbia and his failure to appear upon or oppose the instant application, we grant petitioner’s motion. We further find that the ends of justice will be served by imposing the same discipline in this State as was imposed in the District of Columbia, i.e., disbarment *(see, e.g., Matter of Barlow,*220 AD2d 983).

Crew III, J. P., White, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion to impose reciprocal discipline upon respondent be and hereby is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent be and hereby is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further ordered that respondent be and hereby is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and he hereby is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority or to give any opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of section 806.9 (22 NYCRR 806.9) of the rules of this Court regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys.
#### Rodell JENKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-116.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 30, 1973.

Charles J. Cullom, Orlando, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William W. Herring, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of French v. State, Fla.App.1972, 266 So.2d 51, and the opinions therein cited.

REED, C. J., and OWEN and MAGER, TT., concur.
EXHIBIT 23


                  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-21077)
and Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-30397) of our report dated
March 31, 1998 (April 23, 1998 with respect to Note A) on the
financial statements included int he annual report on Form 10-KSB
of Food Court Entertainment Network, Inc. as of and for the year
ended December 31, 1997.

/s/ Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York
May 5, 1998
#### Phillip ACKERMAN, Appellant, v. Marie C. CURRY, Appellee.

No. 73-232.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 10, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-158089, 333-158091, 333-158095, 333-150431, 333-119198,
333-131876, 333-121004, 333-122433, 333-109511, 333-122693, 333-141877 and
333-147992) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-113889) of
our report  dated March 25, 2009, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Apollo Gold Corporation (the “Company”) (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and includes a
separate report titled Comments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
on Canada-United States of America Reporting Differences referring to changes in
accounting principles and substantial doubt on the Company’s ability to continue
as a going concern), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company
for the year ended December 31, 2008.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche
LLP


Independent
Registered Chartered Accountants


Vancouver,
Canada


March 25,
2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          16,374
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,290
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,160
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    101,992
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          13,755
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            13,569
<LOANS>                                        333,644
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,788
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 487,364
<DEPOSITS>                                     418,020
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,561
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,785
<LONG-TERM>                                     11,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,066
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 487,364
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 28,569
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,984
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   651
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                36,204
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,283
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,749
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           20,455
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      670
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  14
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 16,977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,895
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,895
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,304
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.94
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.42
<LOANS-NON>                                        447
<LOANS-PAST>                                     6,333
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,273
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      432
<RECOVERIES>                                        99
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,788
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,788


</TABLE>
# C_2009029EN.01S00301.xml

| 5.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
[No. 617-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

December 13, 1971.]

#### Atlas Electric Service, Inc., *Plaintiff,*v. Strom Construction Co., Inc., *Respondent,*W. A. Botting Plumbing & Heating Co., *Appellant.*
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 372

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives concerning providing

as part of health care reform financial incentives to promote worksite

health promotion programs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 1994

Mr. BROWN of Ohio (for himself and Mr. UPTON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Energy and

Commerce and Education and Labor

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives concerning providing as part of health care reform financial

incentives to promote worksite health promotion programs.

1 Resolved, it is the sense of the House of Representa2 tives that, regardless of the particular approach taken to

3 reform the health care system in the United States, there

4 should be financial incentives for employers to offer work5 site health promotion programs which provide appropriate

6 screening, counseling, and education for employees at the

7 worksite in order to promote health, safety, and personal

8 involvement in preventing illness and injury.
2

•HRES 372 IH

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31246-31247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14208]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Interest Rates

    The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called 
the optional ``peg'' rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This 
rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for 
maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be 
used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. 
This rate will be 2.875 percent for the July-September quarter of FY 
2018.
    Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for 
any third party lender's commercial loan

[[Page 31247]]

which funds any portion of the cost of a 504 project (see 13 CFR 
120.801) shall be 6% over the New York Prime rate or, if that exceeds 
the maximum interest rate permitted by the constitution or laws of a 
given State, the maximum interest rate will be the rate permitted by 
the constitution or laws of the given State.

Dianna L. Seaborn,
Director, Office of Financial Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2018-14208 Filed 7-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
EX-10.12






 Apria, Inc. has requested confidential treatment of this registration statement and
associated correspondence 
 pursuant to Rule 83 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

 Exhibit 10.12 

November 15, 2020 
 Debra L. Morris 

Re:     Amendment of Executive Severance Agreement 

Dear Debra: 
 This letter confirms the amendment, as set forth
below, of your Executive Severance Agreement, dated March 11, 2013, with Apria Healthcare, Inc., now called Apria Healthcare LLC (the “Agreement”). This letter supersedes that certain letter agreement between you and Apria
Healthcare LLC, dated June 27, 2018, in its entirety. 
 In the event that you become entitled to severance pay pursuant to Section 4 of the
Agreement, each payment in a series of payments under the Agreement shall be deemed to be a separate payment for purposes of Section 409A of the Code of 1986, as amended. 

Except as expressly provided in the preceding paragraph, your Agreement continues in effect in accordance with its terms. This letter agreement shall be
construed and interpreted consistent with Section 11(a) of the Agreement. 
 If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Celina
Scally at [redacted]. 
 APRIA HEALTHCARE LLC 

By: /s/ Raoul
Smyth                             

Name: Raoul Smyth 

Title:    Executive Vice President, General Counsel 

Acknowledged and agreed: 
 /s/ Debra L.
Morris                         

Debra L. Morris
| 1.     |   | XImage      Corporation, a California Corporation                                                                   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                |
| 2.     |   | ImageWare      Systems ID Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly Imaging      Technology Corporation)   |
|   |   |                                                                                                                |
| 3.     |   | I.W.      Systems Canada Company, a Nova Scotia unlimited liability      company                                    |
|   |   |                                                                                                                |
| 4.     |   | ImageWare      Digital Photography Systems, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company      (formerly Castleworks LLC) |
|   |   |                                                                                                                |
| 5.     |   | Digital      Imaging International GmbH, a company formed under German    laws                                      |