alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 315I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 315I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6323 September 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 315I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6323 September 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2020/C 315 I/01 | Council Decision of 21 September 2020 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Social Security Systems | 1 |
| 2020/C 315 I/02 | Council Decision of 21 September 2020 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers | 5 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2020/C 315 I/01

Council Decision of 21 September 2020 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Social Security Systems

1

2020/C 315 I/02

Council Decision of 21 September 2020 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers

5

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Portis, *et al., v.*Green.

Illegal consideration. The fact that the consideration for a promissory note sued on was a horse, which the payee, who sues, *knew*was to be *wed*in the service of the *Confederacy,*is a *good defense*to the note.

*Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court.*

Il9n. William M. Harrison, Circuit Judge.

Bell & Oarleton, for appellants.

Rice, Benjamin & Ratcliffe and Black, for appellee.

Bowen, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note, executed by appellants to appellee.

*377Defendants in the circuit court plead that the note ivas given for a horse, and that the appellee, Green, knew that the same was to be used in the service of the Confederate States, against the Government of the United States. A demurrer to this plea having been sustained, to which ruling the defendants excepted and declined to plead over, the court rendered. judgment for the amount of the note, with interest and costs. Defendants appealed.

The case of *Tatum v.*Kelly, decided by this court at its last term, settled the only point in this case. Defendant’s plea was a sufficient defense, and the demurrer thereto should have been overruled. See authorities cited in the case of *Kelly v. Tatum.*

Judgment reversed.

Judge Harrison being disqualified, did not sit in this case,

lion. John "Wiiytock, Special Supreme Judge.
H. Res. 173

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

May 20, 1993.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 45) authorizing the use of

United States Armed Forces in Somalia. The first reading of

the joint resolution shall be dispensed with. General debate

shall be confined to the joint resolution and the amendments

made in order by this resolution and shall not exceed one

hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs. After general debate the joint resolution shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be

in order to consider as an original text for the purpose of

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on

Foreign Affairs now printed in the joint resolution. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be con-
2

HRES 173 EH

sidered as read. Points of order against the committee

amendment in the nature of a substitute for failure to comply

with clause 7 of rule XVI are waived. No amendment to the

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be

in order except those printed in the report of the Committee

on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each amendment

may be offered only in the order printed, may be offered only

by the named proponent or a designee, shall be considered as

read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report

equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment (except that pro

forma amendments for the purpose of debate may be offered

by the chairman or ranking minority member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs), and shall not be subject to a demand

for division of the question in the House or in the Committee

of the Whole. At the conclusion of consideration of the joint

resolution for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the joint resolution to the House with such amendments as

may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate

vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the joint resolution or to the committee

amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening mo-
3

HRES 173 EH

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Johnny WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-507.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 21, 1971.

Appeal from Court of Record for Brow-ard County; Robert W. Tyson, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.2
 
                                  PSINET INC.
 
  CALCULATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE AND WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
                             USED IN CALCULATION(1)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 YEAR ENDED
                                                              DECEMBER 31, 1996
                                                              -----------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Common stock:
  Shares outstanding at beginning of year....................     37,914,932
  Weighted average shares issued during the year ended Decem-
   ber 31, 1996 (2,198,302 shares)...........................      1,463,072
                                                                ------------
                                                                  39,378,004
                                                                ============
Net loss.....................................................   $(55,097,000)
                                                                ============
Basic and diluted loss per share.............................   $      (1.40)
                                                                ============
</TABLE>
--------
(1) For a description of basic and diluted loss per share, see Note 1 of the
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8
    of this Form 10-K.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving                               ( print page 31839)                            customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, August 9, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Otis Simpson at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3332.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be held Thursday, August 9, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Otis Simpson. For more information please contact Otis Simpson at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3332, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues. Otis Simpson. For more information please contact Otis Simpson at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3332, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues.                

The agenda will include a discussion on various letters, and other issues related to written communications from the IRS.

Dated: July 2, 2018.

Terrie English,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2018-14645 Filed 7-6-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 39 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 39

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 25, 1993.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be and is hereby elected as 
chairman of the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on the Budget: Martin Olav Sabo, Chairman.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 338

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses

of investigations and studies by the Committee on Rules in the second

session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1994

Mr. MOAKLEY (for himself and Mr. SOLOMON) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House

for expenses of investigations and studies by the Committee on Rules in the second session of the One Hundred

Third Congress.

1 Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and

2 studies by the Committee on Rules (hereinafter in this res3 olution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including ex4 penses for provision of assistance for members of profes5 sional staff in obtaining specialized training under section

6 202(j) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946,

7 there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House

8 not more than $722,479.
2

HRES 338 IH

1 (b) Not more than $2,500 of the amount specified

2 in subsection (a) may be used for specialized training re3 ferred to in such subsection.

4 SEC. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made

5 on vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

6 chairman of the Committee, and approved by the Commit7 tee on House Administration.

8 SEC. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolu9 tion for investigations and studies carried out during the

10 period beginning at noon on January 3, 1994, and ending

11 immediately before noon on January 3, 1995.

12 SEC. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution

13 shall be expended in accordance with regulations pre14 scribed by the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
# C_2020215EN.01005401.xml

| 29.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/54

---

Action brought on 27 April 2020 — Aerospinning Master Franchising v EUIPO — Mad Dogg Athletics (SPINNING)

(Case T-246/20)

(2020/C 215/62)

Language in which the application was lodged: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Aerospinning Master Franchising s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: K. Labalestra, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. (Venice, California, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘SPINNING’ — European Union trade mark No 175 117

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 February 2020 in Case R 369/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;

| — | Infringement of Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

---
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 3.5



          CANADA                                                          NUMBER
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA                                              330743


                                     [Logo]




                          PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

                  Ministry of Finance and Corporate Relations

                             REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES


                                   COMPANY ACT

                                   CERTIFICATE



                              I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT


                         NO. 96 SAIL VIEW VENTURES LTD.


                   HAS THIS DAY CHANGED ITS NAME TO THE NAME


                          EAST COAST EXPLORATIONS LTD.


                                          GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE

                                                      VICTORIA, BRITISH COLUMBIA

                                               THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1987

                                                                     B. BECKWITH

                                             ASST. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
#### Shirley Jean WRIGHT, Appellant, v. Thompson Truman WRIGHT, Appellee.

No. 70-111.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 24, 1970.

Peter A. Portley, Pompano Beach, for appellant.

Richard R. Kirsch and Ellen S. Mills of Kirsch & Druck, Fort Lauderdale, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion to enforce an alleged oral property settlement and separation agreement.

The order is affirmed but we make no determination of whether the parties reached an agreement, or if so whether it is valid and binding or subject to defenses, as the record does not disclose that these issues have been either alleged or determined by the trial court. Upon appropriate application to that court prior to final hearing in this cause, leave should be granted the parties to amend the pleadings to allege such property settlement agreement, or any defenses to it, as the parties may be advised.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, REED, and OWEN, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.3**CERTIFICATIONSI, Charles E. Moran, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of SkillSoft Public Limited Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Omitted; 4. Omitted; 5. Omitted.        Dated: May 31, 2007 /s/ Charles E. Moran   Charles E. Moran   President and Chief Executive Officer
Table A-14. Unemployed persons by industry and class of worker, 

not seasonally adjusted 

A to Z Index | FAQs | About BLS | Contact Us Subscribe to E-mail Updates

What's New | Release Calendar | Site Map

Search BLS.gov

Economic News Release CES CPS FONT SIZE: PRINT: 

HOUSEHOLD DATA 

Table A-14. Unemployed persons by industry and class of worker, not seasonally 

adjusted

Industry and class of worker

Number of 

unemployed 

persons 

(in thousands)

Unemployment

rates

May 

2010

May 

2011

May 

2010

May 

2011

Total, 16 years and over(1) 14,369 13,421 9.3 8.7

Nonagricultural private wage and salary workers 11,655 10,628 9.9 8.9

Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction 46 32 6.2 3.8

Construction 1,755 1,367 20.1 16.3

Manufacturing 1,584 1,453 10.3 9.6

Durable goods 1,028 920 10.7 9.6

Nondurable goods 556 533 9.7 9.6

Wholesale and retail trade 1,998 1,845 9.8 9.0

Transportation and utilities 461 483 7.8 8.0

Information 319 227 9.8 7.3

Financial activities 618 612 6.8 6.8

Professional and business services 1,624 1,429 11.5 9.8

Education and health services 1,150 1,242 5.4 5.7

Leisure and hospitality 1,601 1,402 12.4 10.6

Other services 498 536 8.1 8.4

Agriculture and related private wage and salary workers 163 131 10.8 8.7

Government workers 771 836 3.4 3.9

Self-employed workers, unincorporated, and unpaid family 

workers 600 636 5.6 6.1

Footnotes 

(1) Persons with no previous work experience and persons whose last job was in the U.S. Armed Forces are 

Home Subject Areas Databases & Tools Publications Economic Releases 

Beta 

Table A-14. Unemployed persons by industry and class of worker, not seasonally adjusted Page 1 of 2

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t14.htm 6/27/2011
Table of Contents 

included in the unemployed total. 

NOTE: Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data. 

Freedom of Information Act | Privacy & Security Statement | Disclaimers | Customer Survey | Important Web Site 

Notices

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics | Division of Labor Force Statistics, PSB Suite 4675, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, 

DC 20212-0001 

www.bls.gov/CPS | Telephone: 1-202-691-6378 | Contact CPS 

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics | Division of Current Employment Statistics, PSB Suite 4860, 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE 

Washington, DC 20212-0001 

www.bls.gov/CES | Telephone: 1-202-691-6555 | Contact CES 

Last Modified Date: June 03, 2011

TOOLS 

Areas at a Glance 

Industries at a Glance 

Economic Releases 

Databases & Tables 

Maps 

CALCULATORS 

Inflation 

Location Quotient 

Injury And Illness 

HELP 

Help & Tutorials 

FAQs 

Glossary 

About BLS 

Contact Us 

INFO 

What's New 

Careers @ BLS 

Find It! DOL 

Join our Mailing Lists 

Linking & Copyright Info 

Table A-14. Unemployed persons by industry and class of worker, not seasonally adjusted Page 2 of 2

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t14.htm 6/27/2011
Exhibit 32


                                  CERTIFICATION

     By  signing  below,  each  of the  undersigned  officers  hereby  certifies
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i) this report fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the  information  contained in this report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Logansport Financial Corp.

     Signed this 29th day of March 2004.



/s/ Dottye Robeson                      /s/ David G. Wihebrink
---------------------------------       ----------------------------------------
(Signature of Authorized Officer)       (Signature of Authorized Officer)


Dottye Robeson                          David G. Wihebrink
---------------------------------       ----------------------------------------
(Typed Name)                            (Typed Name)


Secretary/Treasurer                     President and Chief Executive Officer
---------------------------------       ----------------------------------------
(Title)                                 (Title)





A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to and is being retained by Logansport  Financial  Corporation and will
be  forwarded  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff  upon
request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHENGYONG WENG,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 17

- 70324

Agency No. A205

- 183

- 796

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 5, 2020 * *

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges

.

Chengyong Weng, a native and citizen of China , petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appea ls’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”)

. Ou r

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review f or substantial evidence

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 17

- 70324

the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility

determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034,

1039

- 40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the pet ition for

review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on inconsistencies between Weng ’s testimony and documentary evidence as

to when he began planning to travel to the United States

. See id. at 1048 (adverse

credibility finding reasonable under the totality of the circumstances). Weng ’s

explanation do es not compel a contrary conclusion. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d

1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). I n the absence of credible testimony, in this case,

Weng ’s asylum claim fail s

. See Farah v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.

2003).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Weng’s contentions as to withholding of

removal and CAT relief because he failed to raise them to the BIA

. See Barron v.

Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 677

- 78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to review

claims not presented to the agency).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part

.