alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ANDREW MAGUYER *vs.*JARED HAWTHORN.

In trover, proof of the misuse or abuse of the thing is evidence of a conversion; and no demand and refusal is necessary, though the original taking was lawful.

Trover. Plea, not guilty.

Hawthorn borrowed a dearborn wagon and harness of Maguyer, and in the use of it his horse ran off and broke it. He sent the wagon to a carriage maker’s to be mended; paid the bill, and gave Maguyer an order for it; which, however, being informal and not including the harness, was never presented. The carriage was mended ; and no person sending for it, it was wheeled into the road, where it stood for a long time and became injured by the weather and by accident.

On this state of facts *Rodney,*for defendant, moved a nonsuit, for want of evidence of a conversion.

*Rodney*.

The case is one of lending. So stated, and so proved. The original taking, therefore, was lawful In order to create a conversion of an article delivered on loan, or in any case where the possession of defendant is lawful, there must be a demand and refusal, A tortious taking is itself a conversion ; but not so of a lawful possession. There is in this case, no proof of a demand and refusal to give the wagon up; on the contrary, Hawthorn sent plaintiff an order for it, which he refused to use because of some alledged informality,

*The Court,*(Harrington J. dissenting) refused to non-suit the plaintiff.

*72
      *Read jr.*for plaintiff.

*Rodney*for defendant.

T. Claytok, *Chief Justice.*

The property came into defendant’s possession by borrowing. His possession was therefore lawful, and without some act inconsistent with the lawfulness of such possession, trover would not lie for it. Merely keeping the dearborn, however long, without misusing it, would not be a conversion, and a demand and refusal to deliver up, would be necessary to this action. The demand and refusal is, however, not a conversion, but only evidence of a conversion. Other acts are equally evidence of a conversion, as misuser or great injury to the thing. 1 *Chitty PL*154; *2 Sawnd. PL Ev.*881. Here the defendant broke the carriage; sent it to one place, and the harness to another; let it stand in the road for two years, without returning or paying any attention to it, until it was almost destroyed. We think this a conversion if the jury find the facts so.

Nonsuit refused and plaintiff had a verdict.
#### Deane ALLEN et al., Appellants, v. Howard Lee COMBS et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1462.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 29, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### DOWLING v. STATE ex rel. McGREEVY.

No. 38795.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                                  SUBSIDIARIES
 
Deliverex Acquisition Corp.
DPAS Acquisition Corp.
Imagent Acquisition Corp.
Leonard Archives Acquisition Corp.
Permanent Records Acquisition Corp.
Recordex Acquisition Corp.
California Medical Record Service Acquisition Corp.
Texas Medical Record Service Acquisition Corp.
Minnesota Medical Record Service Acquisition Corp.
ZIA Information Analysis Group, Inc.
Researchers Acquisition Corp.
Deliverex Sacramento Acquisition Corp.
B&B (Baltimore-Washington) Acquisition Corp.
Premier Acquisition Corp.
Robert A. Cook Acquisition Corp.
RAC (California) Acquisition Corp.
CH Acquisition Corp.
DISC Acquisition Corp.
The Rust Consulting Group, Inc.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1
 PC MALL, INC.
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
As of December 31, 2007
  SUBSIDIARIES
    
    JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATIONAF Services, LLC
    
    DelawareOnsale, Inc.
    
    DelawareOSRP, LLC
    
    DelawarePC Mall Canada, Inc.
    
    QuebecPC Mall Gov, Inc. (1)
    
    DelawarePC Mall Sales, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaSARCOM, Inc. (2)
    
    DelawareWareforce Corp. (3)
    
    Delaware
 
 (1)
    
    On September 7, 2006, PC Mall Gov, Inc., through GMR Systems, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary, acquired the products business from Government Micro Resources, Inc. As a result,
PC Mall Gov also conducts its business from time-to-time under the name PC Mall Gov, Inc. dba
GMRI.(2)
    
    Acquired by PC Mall, Inc. on September 17, 2007.(3)
    
    Previously WF Acquisition Sub, Inc. Effective December 1, 2005, CCIT, Inc. merged with WF
Acquisition Sub, Inc. and the name of the combined entity was changed to Wareforce Corp.
#### Joseph Perriconi, Respondent, v St. John’s Preparatory High School, et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[736 NYS2d 698]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant St. John’s Preparatory High School appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Plug, J.), dated December 14, 2000, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and the defendant Paris Maintenance Company, Inc., separately appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as denied its separate motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motions are granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured when he tripped and fell on a raised and cracked portion of the public sidewalk abutting property owned by the defendant St. John’s Preparatory High School and maintained by the defendant Paris Maintenance Company, Inc. An abutting landowner will be liable to a pedestrian injured by a defect in a public sidewalk when the owner either created the defect or caused it to occur by a special use, or when a statute or ordinance obligates the owner to maintain the sidewalk and makes the owner liable for injuries caused by a breach of that obligation (see, *Capobianco v Mari,*267 AD2d 191). Although there was evidence that the defendants repaired the sidewalk on the block where the plaintiff fell, they made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by relying upon the plaintiffs own deposition testimony that no repairs had been made in the area where the accident occurred *(see, Yass v Deepdale Gardens,*187 AD2d 506). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Consequently, summary judgment should have been granted to the defendants. Goldstein, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Crane, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 349 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 349

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
investigations and studies by the Committee on Natural Resources in the 
           second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 1994

Mr. Miller of California submitted the following resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
investigations and studies by the Committee on Natural Resources in the 
           second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

    Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and studies by 
the Committee on Natural Resources (hereinafter in this resolution 
referred to as the ``Committee''), including expenses for--
            (1) procurement of consultant services under section 202(i) 
        of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946; and
            (2) provision of assistance for members of professional 
        staff in obtaining specialized training under section 202(j) of 
        such Act;
there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House not more 
than $2,243,095.
    (b) Not more than $2,500 of the amount specified in subsection (a) 
may be used for consultant services referred to in paragraph (1) of 
such subsection and not more than $100 of such amount may be used for 
specialized training referred to in paragraph (2) of such subsection.
    Sec. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers 
authorized by the Committee, signed by the chairman of the Committee, 
and approved by the Committee on House Administration.
    Sec. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolution for 
investigations and studies carried out during the period beginning at 
noon on January 3, 1994, and ending immediately before noon on January 
3, 1995.
    Sec. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution shall be 
expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on 
House Administration.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 249 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 249

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 13, 1993.
    Resolved, That the Honorable G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery, a Representative from 
the State of Mississippi, be, and he is hereby, elected Speaker pro tempore 
during any absence of the Speaker, such authority to continue not later than 
September 15, 1993.
    Resolved, That the President and the Senate be notified by the Clerk of the 
election of the Honorable G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery as Speaker pro tempore during 
the absence of the Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Peter DOUGLASS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-375.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 13, 1973.

Phillip Hubbart, Public Defender, and Steven Rappaport, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal by the defendant below from conviction of aggravated assault, appellant contends the court committed error in denying his motion for acquittal at the close of the case on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction.

The appellant has not demonstrated insufficiency of the evidence. On the contrary, the record reveals there was ample evidence to sustain the conviction. Although contradicted by the defendant, there was evidence the defendant struck the victim in the face and threatened him manually with a hammer.

No reversible error having been made to appear, the judgment is affirmed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 884

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the deduction limitation which applies to State legislators who reside within 50 miles of

the capitol building of the State.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 16, 1993

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself and Mr. ZELIFF) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the deduction limitation which applies to State legislators

who reside within 50 miles of the capitol building of

the State.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRAVEL EXPENSES OF CERTAIN STATE LEGIS4 LATORS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (h) of section 162 of

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to State leg7 islators’ travel expenses away from home) is amended by

8 striking paragraph (4).
2

•HR 884 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

3 December 31, 1992.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,492
<SECURITIES>                                     6,007
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                       508
<INVENTORY>                                      5,287
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,605
<PP&E>                                           5,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,323
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,966
<SALES>                                         51,590
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,590
<CGS>                                           25,181
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,875
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (713)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,234
<INCOME-TAX>                                       493
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                741
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       741
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
#### IBERIA, LINEAS AEREAS DE ESPANA, S. A., Appellant, v. Charles KNAPP, etc., Appellee.

No. 72-1405.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 10, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 29 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 29

   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Federal 
               excise tax rates should not be increased.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Neal of North Carolina submitted the following resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Federal 
               excise tax rates should not be increased.

Whereas the Federal Government imposes excise taxes on a variety of items, 
        including cigarettes, wine, beer, distilled spirits, gasoline, telephone 
        services, and air transportation;
Whereas Federal excise tax revenues were $36.8 billion in 1988 which was 3.9 
        percent of all Federal revenues for that year;
Whereas State governments depend heavily on excise taxes to finance essential 
        services, and increases in Federal excise taxes during this decade have 
        (by reducing consumption) already reduced State revenues by $3.7 billion 
        and will cost them that much again before 1994;
Whereas Federal excise taxes are imposed on transactions regardless of the 
        income levels of the consumers and as such are regressive taxes which 
        cause economic hardships to those least capable of paying additional 
        taxes;
Whereas the Tax Reform Act of 1986 was designed to assist low and middle income 
        taxpayers and any increase in excise tax rates would directly contradict 
        the intent of that Act;
Whereas increasing selective taxes such as excise taxes is bad budgetary policy 
        in attempting to meet the deficit reduction targets; and
Whereas no sound policy basis exists to support proposals to increase the 
        current Federal excise tax rates: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
Federal excise tax rates should not be increased.

                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

2:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 5, 2018.

# PLACE:

Closed Commission Hearing, Room 10800.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

Commissioner Stein, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the closed meeting in closed session.

The subject matters of the closed meeting will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; please contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: June 28, 2018. 

Brent J. Fields, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-14392 Filed 6-29-18; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 355

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the people of

the United States should be encouraged to practice random acts of kindness.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 9, 1994

Mr. TUCKER (for himself, Mr. LEHMAN, Mr. THOMAS of California, Mr. VALENTINE, Mr. WYNN, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. WATT, and Ms. ROYBALALLARD) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the people of the United States should be encouraged

to practice random acts of kindness.

Whereas the incidence of random acts of violence in the

United States has reached epidemic levels;

Whereas the Surgeon General of the United States estimates

that, every day in the United States, 135,000 children

carry guns to school;

Whereas every day in the United States 3 children are killed

by child abuse, 9 children are murdered, 13 children are

killed by guns, 30 children are wounded by guns, 307

children are arrested for crimes of violence, 7,945 chil-
2

•HRES 355 IH

dren are reported abused or neglected, and 5,703 teenagers are victims of violent crime;

Whereas every 4 hours a child in the United States commits

suicide;

Whereas, in the United States, every 6 minutes a rape is

committed, and every year between 3,000,000 and

4,000,000 women are battered by their partners and

more than 200,000 women are stalked;

Whereas, every year in the United States, there are 4.7 random acts of violence committed against every 1,000 persons 65 years of age or older;

Whereas, every year in the United States, there are 758.1

random acts of violence for every 100,000 persons in the

United States, and 235 firearm-related acts of violence

for every 100,000 persons in the United States;

Whereas there are 238,000,000 handguns in the United

States;

Whereas, in 1992 in the United States, there were 1,730

anti-Semitic incidents, the total number of white-supremacist groups rose 27 percent above the number from

the previous year, and a record number of bias-related incidents, including 31 murders, were reported;

Whereas hate crimes against Asians comprised 8.9 percent of

all hate crimes documented in Los Angeles County in

1990;

Whereas the United States strongly opposes random acts of

violence, and all forms of intolerance and mean-spiritedness based on ethnicity, religion, race, gender, or sexual

orientation; and
3

•HRES 355 IH

Whereas Professor Chuck Wall of Bakersfield College has

committed his efforts to promoting random acts of kindness among all people: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the people of the United States should

3 be encouraged to practice random acts of kindness, in the

4 spirit of compassion, kindness, and goodwill toward all

5 persons.

Æ