alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

83 FR 29582, 25 Jun 2018.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

The following item will not be considered during the Open Meeting on Thursday, June 28, 2018:
      - Whether the Commission should enter into a revised memorandum of understanding with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission that would update and supersede the existing regulatory coordination memorandum of understanding between the two agencies.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: June 28, 2018.

Brent J. Fields,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-14280 Filed 6-28-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
1

WIND FIELDS IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 

DURING THE 2008 WILD FIRES 

Introduction:

The MM5 model was used to develop wind fields to assess the transport of smoke 

originating from wildfires that occurred in Northern California in June and July 2008. 

The MM5 model was set up with three nested grids to study the meteorology. 

Synoptic conditions:

A large scale pressure system located off the coast of California had dominated the 

area and induced subsidence motion and associated high temperatures that were 

conducive the occurrence of wildfire events (Figure 1). Dominant wind over California 

was from the northwest while the local scale winds had changing wind direction, owing 

to topography as well as local temperature differences.

Model Simulations:

June 23 and 26, 2008 and July 11, 19, and 23, 2008 were chosen as smoke episodes 

that affected the Sacramento Valley during the summer of 2008. Two model 

simulations were carried out; with one starting on June 21, 2008 00Z and ending on 

June 27, 2008 00Z, and another starting on July 9, 2008 00Z and ending on July 24, 

2008 12Z. 

Results:

Wind vectors and associated streamlines predicted by the model near the surface on 

June 23 and 26, and July 11, 19, and 23 were plotted and hourly variations were 

examined. The wind vectors (Figures 2, 4, 6, 8, 10) and streamlines (Figures 3, 5, 7, 9, 

11) confirmed the hourly surface observations that downslope winds, generated by 
2

cooling of air near the surface on the western sides of Sierra Nevada Mountains in 

northern California, were largely responsible in carrying the smoke plumes originating 

from the wildfires burning in Northern California.
3

Figure 1: Sea level pressure affecting the area on June 23, 2008 at 00Z.
4

Figure 2: Wind vectors predicted by the model at 15Z on June 23, 2008.
5

Figure 3: Streamlines predicted by the model at 15Z on June 23, 2008.
6

Figure 4: Wind vectors predicted by the model at 12Z on June 26, 2008.
7

Figure 5: Streamlines predicted by the model at 12Z on June 26, 2008.
8

Figure 6: Wind vectors predicted by the model at 15Z on July 11, 2008.
9

Figure 7: Streamlines predicted by the model at 15Z on July 11, 2008.
10

Figure 8: Wind vectors predicted by the model at 13Z on July 19, 2008.
11

Figure 9: Streamlines predicted by the model at 13Z on July 19, 2008.
12

Figure 10: Wind vectors predicted by the model at 12Z on July 23, 2008.
13

Figure 11: Streamlines predicted by the model at 12Z on July 23, 2008.
# all_lease08012018
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 112 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 112

 Concerning the December 1992 presidential election in the Republic of 
                                 Korea.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1993

Mr. Foglietta submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Concerning the December 1992 presidential election in the Republic of 
                                 Korea.

Whereas free and fair presidential elections provide the basis for peaceful 
        transition of power and the legitimacy of a newly elected president;
Whereas the Republic of Korea held its first free and fair presidential election 
        on December 18, 1992; and
Whereas the legitimately elected President Kim Young-sam will enjoy a strong 
        relationship with the United States: Now, therefore be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) applauds former President Roh Tae-Woo's advocacy and 
        administration of the free and fair presidential election held 
        on December 18, 1992, in the Republic of Korea;
            (2) recognizes such election as symbolizing the commitment 
        of the Republic of Korea to a democratic form of government;
            (3) recognizes President Kim Young-sam as a harbinger of 
        democracy in the Republic of Korea; and
            (4) wishes President Kim Young-sam well in his presidency.

                                 <all>
```
#### Doris K. COBURN and her husband, H. Jules Coburn, Appellants, v. DELMONICO HOTEL CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 66-1056.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 3, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 31, 1967.

Podhurst & Orseck, Miami, for appellants.

West & Goldman, Frates, Fay, Floyd & Pearson and Larry Stewart, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs below from an adverse summary judgment. The action was by the appellant Doris K. Co-burn for damages for personal injuries suffered by her in a fall on the premises of a hotel owned and operated by the appellee. She was joined in the action by her husband who sought derivative damages.

The plaintiff Doris Coburn alleged that while a guest of the hotel she fell on a shuffleboard court on the pool deck while proceeding to a nearby telephone after being paged. It was alleged that the shuffleboard court was raised 3% inches above the pool deck level and was substantially the same brownish color as the pool deck. Plaintiffs charged defendant with negligence by maintaining the premises in an unsafe condition and alleged the condition was such as to constitute a trap.

The defendant denied negligence and pleaded contributory negligence. Following discovery depositions the trial court *31granted the defendant s motion for summary judgment. We find error, and reverse on the authority of Miceli v. Lifter, Fla.App. 1964, 161 So.2d 253. The pleadings and the evidence which was before the court presented triable issues of negligence and contributory negligence which could not properly be resolved on motion for summary judgment.

Reversed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 786

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the exclusion from

gross income for veterans’ benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1993

Mr. MONTGOMERY (for himself, Mr. STUMP, Mr. EVANS, Mr. ROWLAND, Mr.

SLATTERY, Mr. SANGMEISTER, and Mr. BISHOP) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify

the exclusion from gross income for veterans’ benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF VETERANS’

4 BENEFITS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 134(b)

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to quali7 fied military benefit) is amended by adding at the end

8 thereof the following new flush sentence:

9 ‘‘For purposes of this paragraph and notwithstand10 ing paragraph (3), the term ‘qualified military bene-
2

•HR 786 IH

1 fit’ includes any allowance or benefit administered

2 by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.’’

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning on

5 or after January 1, 1984.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,080
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    125,627
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          65,509
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            65,581
<LOANS>                                        298,257<F1>
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 537,373
<DEPOSITS>                                     409,898
<SHORT-TERM>                                    49,963
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,805
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,650
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 537,373
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 27,495
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,574
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   945
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                38,014
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,988
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,962
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           19,052
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      535
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  60
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,995
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,995
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,074
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.84
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,126
<LOANS-PAST>                                       415
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   121
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,306
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      811
<RECOVERIES>                                       249
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,279
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,279
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
<F1>New of allowance for loan losses of $5,279.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 411

Expressing the profound regret and sorrow of the House of Representatives

on the death of Richard Milhous Nixon, former President of the United

States of America.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 25, 1994

Mr. MICHEL submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the profound regret and sorrow of the House

of Representatives on the death of Richard Milhous

Nixon, former President of the United States of America.

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives has

2 learned with profound regret and sorrow of the death of

3 Richard Milhous Nixon, former President of the United

4 States of America.

5 Resolved, That in recognition of the many virtues,

6 public and private, of one who served with distinction as

7 Representative, Senator, Vice President, and President,

8 the Speaker shall appoint committees of the House to join
2

HRES 411 ATH

1 with such Members of the Senate as may be designated,

2 to attend the funeral services of the former President.

3 Resolved, That the House tenders its deep sympathy

4 to the members of the family of the former President in

5 their sad bereavement.

6 Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms of the House

7 be authorized and directed to take such steps as may be

8 necessary for carrying out the provisions of these resolu9 tions, and that the necessary expenses in connection there10 with be paid out of the contingent fund of the House.

11 Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolu12 tions to the Senate and transmit a copy of the same to

13 the family of the former President.

14 Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it ad15 journ as a further mark of respect to the memory of the

16 former President.

Æ
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Brian Lee

177 Daisy St

Woodland Park, CO 80863

Section 333 February 7, 2016

I will fly the aircraft in locations were it is unlikely to effect traffic or be a distraction to traffic.

The aircraft will be set to maintain a maximum flight ceiling of 200 feet.

I will not fly directly overhead of people.

I will fly the aircraft within a visual line of sight at all times.

I will not fly within 5 miles of an airport unless I have contacted the airport and control tower before flying.

I will not fly near people or stadiums.

The aircraft weighs less than the 55 pound limit.

I will not be careless or wreckless with the aircraft.

Granting the exemption will be in the best interest of the public by providing additional information and otherwise unavailable data from

an aerial perspective for correctly determining liability of parties involved in insurance claims.

Granting the exemption for mineral/precious gem prospecting will benefit the public by aiding in the location of precious metals that are

necessary for the overall good of the economy.

The aircraft will be used for multiple purposes including insurance claims handling such as accident scene investigation for aerial

photographs and video and for accessing unsafe or difficult to access locations such as steep or dangerous roofs.

Another use for this aircraft will be mineral/precious gem prospecting for locating potential mining locations to view and search areas

that have difficult and or limited access and to record promising locations for further review.

Frequent flight practice during a wide variety or weather and light conditions will be necessary.

The make of the aircraft is DJI the model is the Phantom 3 Advanced.

My current registration number is FA3A3YFPMC

Issued date is 12/25/2015 expiration date is 1212/24/2012/24/2018
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 163 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 38

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 163

                          [Report No. 103-78]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2) to establish national voter registration procedures for 
               Federal elections, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 4, 1993

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                  House Calendar No. 38
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 163

                          [Report No. 103-78]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2) to establish national voter registration procedures for 
               Federal elections, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 1993

    Mr. Frost, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2) to establish national voter registration procedures for 
               Federal elections, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That during consideration of the conference report to 
accompany the bill (H.R. 2) to establish national voter registration 
procedures for Federal elections, and for other purposes, points of 
order against the conference report for failure to comply with clause 3 
of rule XXVIII are waived.
```
#### VIBRO MFG. CO., Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 130, Docket 27747.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 8, 1963.

Decided Jan. 9, 1963.

*254Charles E. Wetzler, President, Vibro Mfg. Co., Inc., Woodside, N. Y., for petitioner.

Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lee A. Jackson, Robert N. Anderson, and Alan D. Pekelner, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before CLARK, KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The Commissioner mailed to the petitioner a notice of deficiency in federal income tax for the calendar year 1958 by certified mail on May 29, 1961. The notice stated that the taxpayer might file a petition for a redetermination of the deficiency within ninety days. On September 8, 1961, 102 days after the mailing of the notice, the taxpayer mailed his petition for redetermination, which was filed with the Tax Court three days later. Since the failure to file a petition within ninety days from the mailing of the notice of deficiency, 26 U.S.C. § 6213 (a), is a jurisdictional defect, Pfeifer v. Commissioner, 272 F.2d 383 (2d Cir. 1959), the Tax Court dismissed the petition after notice was given to the petitioner by the Commissioner and an opportunity given to file an affidavit in opposition.

The decision of the Tax Court was entered on November 27, 1961. The petition for review of that decision was filed in the Tax Court on July 11, 1962, more than seven months thereafter. In so doing, the petitioner failed to comply with 26 U.S.C. § 7483, which requires this filing to be completed within three months after the decision of the Tax Court is rendered. The taxpayer attempts to excuse its noneompliance by a claim of delinquent mails. Nonetheless, the statutory restriction is absolute, and untimely filing of the petition for review deprives this Court of jurisdiction to entertain the petition. See Lasky v. Commissioner, 235 F.2d 97 (9th Cir. 1956), aff’d per curiam, 352 U.S. 1027, 77 S.Ct. 594, 1 L.Ed.2d 598 (1957); Commissioner v. Realty Operators, Inc., 118 F.2d 286 (5th Cir. 1941).

Even were we to hold that delayed receipt of notice of the Tax Court’s decision excused the taxpayer’s untimely filing of its petition for review, we would be constrained to affirm the decision of the Tax Court. Section 6213(a) clearly provides that the petition for redetermination of tax deficiency must be filed within 90 days of the date of mailing of the notice of deficiency. Petitioner’s failure to comply is again explained by delinquent mails; it argues that the Commissioner’s notice of deficiency was not received until June 9, 1961. Even if the date of receipt of the notice rather than the date of its mailing were the operative date to commence the running of the ninety-day period, taxpayer’s petition was nonetheless untimely. The Tax Court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction was therefore appropriate.

Petition for review dismissed.
#### Glenn Roy STUBBS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-698.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 28, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Russell H. McIntosh, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# Report a website issue

This page is for reporting problems and errors you experienced while using GSA.gov.

**Please note:** 
                        - We are unable to address issues related to other websites. Although we link to other GSA websites, we can only update pages with  www.gsa.gov  in the web address (URL).
                        - We review all reported issues carefully but we are unable to respond directly to you.

Examples of website issues:
                        - Links that are broken or go to the wrong place.
                        - Mistakes in our content.
                        - Out-of-date phone numbers, addresses, or agency program names.
                        - Pages or features that do not display or work properly.

To report other issues, please visit our contact us page. 

## Describe the issue

Print PageEmail Page

Top

-  Website Information-  Overview 
-  A-Z index 
-  Accessibility statement 
-  Digital strategy 
-  Report a website issue 
-  Web records 
-  Website policies