alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <PAGE>
  <ARTICLE> 5
  <MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
         
  <S>                            <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
  <PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1998
  <CASH>                                              953
  <SECURITIES>                                          0
  <RECEIVABLES>                                     4,647
  <ALLOWANCES>                                          0
  <INVENTORY>                                         825
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6,825
  <PP&E>                                           57,822
  <DEPRECIATION>                                   34,403
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   41,918
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10,196
  <BONDS>                                          14,912
  <COMMON>                                             49
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
  <PREFERRED>                                           0
  <OTHER-SE>                                        7,770
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     41,918
  <SALES>                                          12,162
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 12,162
  <CGS>                                            10,138
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                    10,138
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     44
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  675
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1,380
  <INCOME-TAX>                                        565
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 815
  <DISCONTINUED>                                        0
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (320)
  <CHANGES>                                             0
  <NET-INCOME>                                        495
  <EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .52
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                       .51
  
          
  
</TABLE>
#### JACOB DERRICKSON vs. JOHN L. MORRIS’ Adm’r.

A receipt in full, though strong evidence, is not conclusive.

Case. Declaration on a promissory note. Plea, payment. Issue.

This was an action on a note given by Thomas Conwell and John L. Morris, as his surety, to Derrickson, the plaintiff, for $180, dated 25th March, 1827, and payable in instalments, all of which fell due before 25th March, 1831. On the back of the note was credited $64 83 *in full;*and Conwell produced the following receipt:

Received, 5th August, 1833, of Thomas Conwell, $64 83, *in full of all demands*up to this date.

(Signed,) Jacob Derrickson.

The defendant also proved the payment by plaintiff of a medical account to John L. Morris, after this note fell due.

On the part of the plaintiff, it was shown that the calculation was made and receipt written by a third person ; that Derrickson was an illiterate man ; and it was contended that this payment was in full of the *interest*up to the date, and that no part of the principal had been paid. The interest due at the time amounted to the sum paid.

*Gray,*for plaintiff!

*Gilpin*and *J. A.Bayard,*for defendant.

*The Court*

charged the jury that a receipt in full of all demands was very strong evidence that the money had been paid, but *not conclusive,*if the party signing the receipt can satisfy the jury that there was a mistake, or any other matter showing that payment to the amount had not in fact been made. *Roscoe Ev.*36.

The plaintiff had a verdict.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and statement of operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                  17,623,728
<SECURITIES>                            19,394,551
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,127,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        36,181,216
<PP&E>                                     531,760
<DEPRECIATION>                           (245,207)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          38,527,311
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   11,818,423
<BONDS>                                    160,938
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     6,765
<OTHER-SE>                              26,541,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            38,527,311
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         6,153,085
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (10,078,741)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (10,078,741)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                          (10,078,741)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (1.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (1.45)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Predictive Markers.                    

*Date:*                         July 10, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Room 2C-212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Alicja L. Markowska, DSC, Ph.D., Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666,                         *markowsa@nia.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 28, 2018.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-14313 Filed 7-2-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2016

EDWARD L. DUTTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND; SAM HSU, Captain; MARCUS 

WESTOVER; D. SUGURE, Officer; JENNIFER POWELL, Officer; 

MARCUS JONES, Lieutenant; JOY TURNER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District 

Judge. (8:08-cv-03504-DKC)

Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 2, 2010

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward L. Dutton, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Prestigiacomo Via, 

Chief, Edward Barry Lattner, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, 

Rockville, Maryland; Danielle E. Marone, Jo Anna Schmidt, 

SCHMIDT, DAILEY & O’NEILL, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland; James F. 

Shalleck, Montgomery, Maryland; Lindsay Nichole Warnes, 

Rockville, Maryland; Jessica Lynn Ellsworth, Steven Paul 

Hollman, HOGAN & HARSON, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Edward L. Dutton appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See Dutton v. Montgomery

County Maryland, No. 8:08-cv-03504-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 11, 2009). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 3.3

                            CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP

                                       OF

                        DIGITAL BROADBAND NETWORKS, INC.
                            (a Delaware corporation)

                                       AND

                       SECURED DIGITAL APPLICATIONS, INC.
                            (a Delaware corporation)


                UNDER SECTION 253 OF THE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW

                            OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

         The undersigned corporations organized and existing under and by virtue
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

         DO HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST: That the name and state of incorporation of each of the constituent
corporations of the merger are as follows:

            NAME                                    STATE OF INCORPORATION
            ----                                    ----------------------

   Digital Broadband Networks, Inc.                          Delaware

   Secured Digital Applications, Inc.                        Delaware


     SECOND: That 100% of the outstanding stock of Secured Digital Applications,
Inc. is owned by Digital Broadband Networks, Inc.

     THIRD: That the name of the surviving corporation of the merger is Digital
Broadband Networks, Inc., which will continue its existence as said surviving
corporation under the name Secured Digital Applications, Inc.

     FOURTH: That the Certificate of Incorporation of Digital Broadband
Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation, the surviving corporation, shall be the
Certificate of Incorporation of the surviving corporation, except that article
FIRST relating to the name shall be struck and shall be substituted in lieu
therefor the following article:

     "FIRST: The name of the corporation is Secured Digital Applications, Inc."

<PAGE>


     FOURTH: That the members of the Board of Directors of Digital Broadband
Networks, Inc. unanimously adopted the following resolution by written consent
on the 22nd day of January 2004:

     RESOLVED, that the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Secured Digital
Applications, Inc., be merged with and into the Company, and that upon the
filing of the appropriate certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of
the State of Delaware, the Company's name shall be changed to Secured Digital
Applications, Inc.

     FIFTH: This merger shall be effective on January 28, 2004.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate this
23rd day of January 2004.


                        DIGITAL BROADBAND NETWORKS, INC.


                          By: /s/ Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
                              -----------------------------------
                              Name: Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
                              Title: President



                       SECURED DIGITAL APPLICATIONS, INC.


                          By: /s/ Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
                              ----------------------------------
                              Name: Patrick Soon-Hock Lim
                              Title: President
# C_2020068EN.01006501.xml

| 2.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/65

---

Action brought on 15 January 2020 — FF IP v EUIPO — Seven (the DoubleF)

(Case T-23/20)

(2020/C 68/73)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: FF IP Srl (Mantua, Italy) (represented by: M. Locatelli, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Seven SpA (Leini, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark the DoubleF — Application for registration No 15 780 001

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 October 2019 in Case R 2588/2018-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | declare the trade mark the DoubleF registrable as an EU trade mark in respect of all the goods in Classes 18 and 35, as set out in application for registration No 15 780 001; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the trade mark the DoubleF registrable as an EU trade mark in respect of all the goods in Classes 18 and 35, as set out in application for registration No 15 780 001;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
H. Res. 301

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

November 10, 1993.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 3116) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30,

1994, and for other purposes. All points of order against the

conference report and against its consideration are waived.

The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
CompDent Corporation, on Form S-8 (File Numbers 33-97372 and 33-12227) of our
report dated February 17, 1999, except as to the information presented in Note 8
for which the date is March 29, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedules of CompDent Corporation
as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1998, which report is included in the Annual Report on Form
10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 29, 1999
----

LIST OF APPOINTMENTS MADE BY THE COUNCIL

(January, February and March 2005) (social field)

(2005/C 88/01)

----
EXHIBIT
                                                                           4.14


                               EXTENSION AGREEMENT
                                      WITH
                                 BRIAN J. MURPHY


                                       62


<PAGE>


                               EXTENSION AGREEMENT

         It is hereby agreed that the Consulting Agreement dated February 15,
2001 between us is hereby extended from June 1, 2001 to August 30, 2001. In
payment of the services performed or to be performed during the aforesaid
extension period, it is further agreed that J-Bird Music Group, Ltd. will issue
to Brian Murphy 70,000 shares of its common stock.

                                                        Signed:

                                                J-Bird Music Group, Ltd.
                                                By: /s/Hope D. Trowbridge
                                                -------------------------
                                                Hope D. Trowbridge
                                                President


                                                /s/Brian J. Murphy
                                                ------------------
                                                Brian J. Murphy


                                       63
<PAGE>
                               99.3 CERTIFICATION


          (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002 of Golf Host Resorts, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on the date hereof
(the "Report") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Merrick Kleeman, President of the
Company, certify, that:

     1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the company.



                                                  /s/ Merrick Kleeman
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  Name:   Merrick Kleeman
                                                  Title:     President
                                                  (Chief Executive Officer)
                                                  Date:   April 2, 2002
#### FORLER *v.*WILLIAMS.

1. Tenancy in Common — Right to Accounting by Cotenant— Pleading.

Bill by cotenant for accounting for use and occupation of land states no case indicating liability to account, where it alleges no ouster, no promise to pay, and nothing to indicate that defendant occupied other than as of right as tenant in common.

2. Same — Accounting Might be Had in Partition Suit.

Accounting for use and occupation of land by cotenant might properly be had in suit for partition.

3. Judgment — Res Judicata — Estoppel — Tenancy in Common— Right to Accounting by Cotenant — Partition.

Tenant in common is estopped from having accounting for use and occupation of land by eotenant, where, in previous suit for partition, accounting was pleaded and tendered by said co-tenant, but was disregarded by plaintiff.

As to liability to account for use and occupation between tenants in common, see annotation in 28 L. R. A. 829; 29 L. R. A. (N. S.) 224; L. R. A. 1918B, 606; 27 A. L. R. 184; 39 A. L. R. 408.

Appeal from Wayne; Webster (Arthur), J.

Submitted January 5, 1932.

(Docket No. 25, Calendar No. 36,077.)

Decided April 4, 1932.

Bill by Norman Forler against Thomas Williams for an accounting as to use of real estate. Bill dismissed. Plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

*Louis B. Ver Wiebe,*for plaintiff.

*Lynch & Ilinks,*for defendant.

Clark, C. J.

The bill was dismissed. Plaintiff has appealed. Facts are stated in *Forler*v. *Williams,*242 Mich. 639, and in *Williams*v. *Richards,*250 Mich. 165.

*687Plaintiff by this bill seeks accounting of defendant, a tenant in common with Mm, for use and occupation of land. Tliis bill states no case indicating liability to account-. It alleges no ouster, no promise to pay, notMng to indicate that defendant occupied other than as of right as a tenant in common. *Everts*v. *Beach,*31 Mich. 136 (18 Am. Rep. 169); *Davis*v. *Filer,*40 Mich. 310.

Accounting was pleaded and tendered, but it was disregarded by plaintiff here, in the case of *Williams*v. *Richards, supra,*a bill for partition. There such accounting might have been proper. We quote syllabus of *Frenzel*v. *Hayes,*242 Mich. 631:

> “Although one cotenant may not recover rent from another cotenant who with his consent occupied the premises’ owned in common, yet where the question arises in partition proceedings in equity, and particularly when the possession has been exclusive, the court has recognized that in adjusting the equities of the parties the one who has had exclusive use and occupation of the premises should account therefor.”

Partition in *Williams*v. *Richards,*to which parties here were parties, was decreed and decree affirmed. It is too late to have accounting, which the record indicates might have been had in connection with the partition, but not otherwise. Plaintiff is estopped.

Decree affirmed, with costs to appellee.

McDonald, Potter, Sharpe, North, Fead, Wiest, and Butzel, JJ., concurred.
#### BARNETT FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF JACKSONVILLE and William Marshall Smith, Jr., as Executors of the Will of Gertrude M. Alford, also known as Marie Gertrude Alford, Deceased, Appellants, v. George BOTNER, Appellee.

No. 785.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

June 28, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 10, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.