alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Albert DAWSON.

No. 61170.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 19, 1978.

Raymond J. LeJeune, Mamou, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. William Pu-cheu, Dist. Atty., A. Bruce Rozas, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Albert Dawson was charged by bill of information with second degree murder in violation of La.R.S. 14:30.1. After trial by jury, defendant was found guilty of manslaughter and sentenced to serve twenty-one years at hard labor with credit for time served. On his original appeal, defendant made no assignment of errors as required by La.Code Crim.P. art. 844. Finding no errors “discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence” (La.Code Crim.P. art. 920(2)), this court affirmed his conviction and sentence.1 Subsequently, defendant applied to the district court for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging the incompetence of counsel on appeal in that counsel failed to perfect assignments of error. After hearing, the writ was denied by the district court. Upon defendant’s application to this court for relief, we granted the writ of habeas corpus and ordered the district court to appoint an attorney to perfect *976assignments of error on a new appeal.2 On his new appeal, defendant relies upon two assignments of error for reversal of his conviction and sentence.

We have reviewed the record and find the two assignments of error to be without merit. Accordingly, we affirm defendant’s conviction and sentence.

DECREE

For the reasons assigned, defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

1

. *State v. Dawson,*333 So.2d 637 (La.1976).

2

. *State ex rel. Dawson v. Maggio,*350 So.2d 1222 (La.1977).
#### Eddie WHITE, Appellant, v. Marvin ROGGENKAMP and Aetna Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. 73-54.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 28, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; William B. Akridge, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# Official Journal L 243/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.243.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 243 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5215 September 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.243.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 243

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5215 September 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Louis J. TSAVARIS, Petitioner, v. Carol T. TSAVARIS, Respondent.

No. 40935.

Supreme Court of Florida

June 23, 1971.

The petition for rehearing is granted and it is ordered that the writ heretofore issued is discharged as having been improvidently issued.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 99.6





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Miramar Mining Corporation (the Company) on Form 40-F Amendment No. 1 for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Elaine Bennett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



September 8, 2005

/s/Elaine Bennett



Elaine Bennett

Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Miramar Mining Corporation and will be retained by Miramar Mining Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Oct 2020
# Official Journal L 52/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 52 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6620 February 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 52

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6620 February 2023

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/361 of 28 November 2022 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and the Council as regards rules for the use of certain veterinary medicinal products for the purpose of prevention and control of certain listed diseases  (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/361 of 28 November 2022 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and the Council as regards rules for the use of certain veterinary medicinal products for the purpose of prevention and control of certain listed diseases  (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### U. I. P. CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Petitioner, v. William G. KRANICH, Respondent.

No. 44311.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 16, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 281 So.2d 50.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
#### DADE COUNTY, Florida, Appellant, v. Ethel M. WOMACK, on her own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 73-243.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 20, 1973.

*442Stuart Simon, County Atty., Jon I. Gordon, and Lisa Bennett, Asst. County Attys., don and Lisa Bennett, Asst. County Attys., Miami, for appellant.

Robert F. Williams, Steven Wisotsky, Miami, for appellant.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order requiring Dade County to pay the costs of publication, which are required under § 62.031 (6), Fla.Stat. F.S.A.

The appellant contends that the court was in error in ruling, as a matter of law, that § 57.081, Fla.Stat. F.S.A. (1971) required the County to pay the cost of publication for indigent parents who wished to change the names of their minor children, when they could not obtain personal service of process upon the missing parent.

We reverse upon the authority of Grissom v. Dade County, Fla.App.1973, 279 So.2d 899, and authorities cited therein,1 and the matter is returned to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

1

. It is noted that Grissom v. Dade. County, supra, was decided subsequent to the date of the order under review in this matter.
#### In re INTEGRATION RULE AMENDMENT. In re MIAMI LAW SCHOOL CIVIL TRIAL PRACTICE PROGRAM.

No. 36763.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 17, 1968.

Walter H. Beckham, Jr., Miami, for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

This matter has been heard on the petition of Walter H. Beckham, a member of The Florida Bar, on behalf of the Law School of the University of Miami.

It appears that said Law School desires to offer a course in trial practice involving training in the actual mechanics of civil trial practice and procedure, and seeks the approval of this Court in order to preclude any real or apparent violation of The Integration Rule, or, The Canons of Ethics. The proposed program was approved by action of the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar on November 10, 1967, and by the Board of Directors of the Dade County Bar Association on May 4, 1967.

It further appears that the proposed program offers a valuable aspect of legal education on an internship basis which may properly be made available to all Florida law students.

It is therefore ordered that the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar be amended by adding thereto Article XVIII, to be designated “Law School Civil Practice Program” and to read as follows:

> “Any law student in an accredited Florida law school may gratuitously assume the role of an advocate in a law school-sponsored trial practice program directly supervised by a lawyer licensed to practice in Florida, and involving insured non-personal injury claims only, wherein the rights of the claimants will be finally determined pursuant to the voluntary submission and agreement of all parties in interest.”

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 298 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 298

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    November 9, 1993.  
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3167) to extend the 
emergency unemployment compensation program, to establish a system of worker 
profiling, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 12

GTE South Incorporated
STATEMENT OF THE RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Thousands of Dollars)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Six Months Ended
                                                      June 30, 1997
                                                     ----------------
<S>                                                        <C>
Net earnings available for fixed charges:    
  Income from continuing operations                        $137,807
  Add - Income taxes                                         84,569
       - Fixed charges                                       29,342
                                                           --------
Adjusted earnings                                          $251,718
                                                           ========
Fixed charges:                               
  Interest expense                                          $26,271
  Portion of rent expense                    
     representing interest                                    3,071
                                                            -------
Adjusted fixed charges                                      $29,342
                                                            =======
                                             
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                             8.58
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


          <ARTICLE> UT
          <CIK> 0000053456
          <NAME> JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
          <MULTIPLIER> 1,000
          <CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
                 
          <S>                              <C>
          <PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
          <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997
          <PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1997
          <PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-1997
          <EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
          <BOOK-VALUE>                        PER-BOOK
          <TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          2,916,233
          <OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>          400,274
          <TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>               403,597
          <TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>             988,184
          <OTHER-ASSETS>                             0
          <TOTAL-ASSETS>                     4,708,288
          <COMMON>                             153,713
          <CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>            510,769
          <RETAINED-EARNINGS>                  860,159
          <TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>     1,524,641
          <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                229,000  <F1>
          <PREFERRED>                           37,741
          <LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>               1,173,141
          <SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                     7,900
          <LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                  0
          <COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>             0
          <LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>         45,884
          <PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>             20,000
          <CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              600
          <LEASES-CURRENT>                      89,231
          <OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     1,580,150
          <TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      4,708,288
          <GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>            510,443
          <INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                  29,345
          <OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>           398,626
          <TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>           427,971
          <OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>               82,472
          <OTHER-INCOME-NET>                     3,179
          <INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>        85,651
          <TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>              27,331  <F2>
          <NET-INCOME>                          58,320
          <PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            3,162
          <EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>         55,158
          <COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              20,000  <F3>
          <TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>             89,902
          <CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>               165,117
          <EPS-PRIMARY>                              0
          <EPS-DILUTED>                              0
          <FN>
          <F1> INCLUDES COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE PREFERRED
          <F1> SECURITIES OF $125,000.
          <F2> INCLUDES DIVIDENDS ON COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
          <F2> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $2,675.
          <F3> REPRESENTS COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS PAID TO PARENT CORPORATION.
          </FN>
                  <PAGE>

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

                                     by the
               Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

      In connection with the Annual Report of LION, Inc., a Washington
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
each of Randall D. Miles, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve Thomson, Chief
Financial Officer, of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbaines-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350), that to his knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/ Randall D. Miles                         /s/ Steve Thomson
------------------------------               -----------------------------------
Randall D. Miles                             Steve Thomson

April 10, 2006                               April 10, 2006
------------------------------               -----------------------------------


                                       1
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed November 4, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-01138-CV 

TRISTAN MICHAEL SIMON, Appellant 

V. 

JENNIFER NICOLE SIMON, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-21-10641 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Pedersen 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

Appellant filed a notice of appeal to challenge a default judgment for divorce. 

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal because the trial court 

has granted his motion for new trial. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

221138F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

TRISTAN MICHAEL SIMON, 

Appellant 

No. 05-22-01138-CV V. 

JENNIFER NICOLE SIMON, 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 330th District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-21-10641. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Burns. Justices Molberg and 

Pedersen participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee Jennifer Nicole Simon recover her costs of 

this appeal from appellants Tristan Michael Simon. 

Judgment entered November 4, 2022.
#### Robert J. FARRIS v. INTERSTATE ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. 53182.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 8, 1973.

In re: Robert J. Farris applying for certi-orari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 270 So.2d 230.

Writ refused. No error of law.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Form 10-K and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000941547
<NAME> HF BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,027
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              29
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,355
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    254,490
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         178,163
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           175,464
<LOANS>                                        484,669
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 984,749
<DEPOSITS>                                     839,655
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             14,067
<LONG-TERM>                                     50,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,961
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 984,749
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 32,407
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               34,115
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                66,522
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              38,083
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,084
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           22,438
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      384
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,039
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 27,137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,278)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     (2,516)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,516)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.50
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,217
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 6,589
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 11,109
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,068
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,712
<RECOVERIES>                                        77
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,780
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,780
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,426
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 12


                             GTE SOUTH INCORPORATED
               Statement of the Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


(Dollars in Millions)                                  Nine Months Ended
                                                       September 30, 1999
                                                       ------------------

<S>                                                    <C>
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income from continuing operations                    $           244.6
  Add - Income taxes                                               157.3
      - Fixed charges                                               56.5
                                                       -----------------

Adjusted earnings                                      $           458.4
                                                       =================

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                     $            52.1
  Portion of rent expense representing interest                      4.4
                                                       -----------------
Adjusted fixed charges                                 $            56.5
                                                       =================

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                  8.11
</TABLE>