31072 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 

Title 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA 

effective 

date 

Final rule/citation date Comments 

*******

II. Definitions .................... 1/14/2017 8/2/2018 [Insert Federal Register 

citation], 7/3/2018.

*******

V. Expansion of the Enhanced Emissions Program to the North Front 

Range Area.

1/14/2017 8/2/2018 [Insert Federal Register 

citation], 7/3/2018.

*******

* * * * * (e) * * * 

Title 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA 

effective 

date 

Final rule/citation date Comments 

*******

Maintenance Plans 

*******

Denver Metropolitan Area 

*******

2008 Ozone Moderate Area Attainment Plan.1/14/2017 8/2/2018 [Insert Federal Register citation], 

7/3/2018.

Except RACT for Metal Furniture 

Coatings, Miscellaneous Metal 

Products Coatings, Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations, 

Industrial Cleaning Solvents, 

Aerospace, Oil and Natural Gas 

Industry, and major source 

RACT. 

*******

[FR Doc. 2018–13599 Filed 7–2–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0160; FRL–9980– 

17—Region 9] 

Air Plan Approval; California; YoloSolano Air Quality Management 

District; Negative Declarations 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

approve a revision to the Yolo-Solano 

Air Quality Management District 

(YSAQMD or ‘‘District’’) portion of the 

California State Implementation Plan 

(SIP). This revision concerns the 

District’s negative declarations for 

several volatile organic compound 

(VOC) source categories included in its 

Reasonably Available Control 

Technology (RACT) State 

Implementation Plan Analysis. We are 

approving these negative declarations 

under the Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘the 

Act’’). 

DATES: This rule is effective on August 

2, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0160. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the https://www.regulations.gov 

website. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., Confidential Business 

Information or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available through https://

www.regulations.gov, or please contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section for 

additional availability information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415) 

947–4122, tong.stanley@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 31073 

Table of Contents 

I. Proposed Action 

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses 

III. EPA Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Proposed Action 

On September 13, 2017, YSAQMD 

adopted its Reasonably Available 

Control Technology State 

Implementation Plan (RACT SIP) 

Analysis for the 2008 ozone National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). Included in the District’s 

RACT SIP analysis were several 

negative declarations where the District 

stated that it did not have sources 

subject to the Control Techniques 

Guidelines (CTG) documents listed 

below in Table 1. The District’s RACT 

SIP further stated that the negative 

declarations were for the 1997 and 2008 

ozone NAAQS. On November 13, 2017, 

the California Air Resources Board 

submitted YSAQMD’s RACT SIP, 

including the following negative 

declarations, to the EPA as a SIP 

revision. 

TABLE 1—SUBMITTED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS 1

CTG document CTG document title 

EPA–450/2–77–008 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume II: Surface Coating of Cans, 

Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks. 

EPA–450/2–77–025 ........... Control of Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, Wastewater Separators, and Process Unit Turnarounds. 

EPA–450/2–77–032 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume III: Surface Coating of Metal Furniture. 

EPA–450/2–77–033 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume IV: Surface Coating of Insulation 

of Magnet Wire. 

EPA–450/2–77–034 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume V: Surface Coating of Large Appliances. 

EPA–450/2–77–036 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Storage of Petroleum Liquids in Fixed-Roof Tanks. 

EPA–450/2–78–029 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products. 

EPA–450/2–78–030 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires. 

EPA–450/2–78–032 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume VII: Factory Surface Coating of 

Flat Wood Paneling. 

EPA–450/2–78–033 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume VIII: Graphic Arts-Rotogravure 

and Flexography. 

EPA–450/2–78–036 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment. 

EPA–450/3–82–009 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners. 

EPA–450/3–83–006 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Synthetic Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing 

Equipment. 

EPA–450/3–83–007 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Equipment Leaks from Natural Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants. 

EPA–450/3–83–008 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Manufacture of High-Density Polyethylene, Polypropylene, 

and Polystyrene Resins. 

EPA–450/3–84–015 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in Synthetic Organic Chemical 

Manufacturing Industry. 

EPA–450/4–91–031 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations in Synthetic 

Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry. 

EPA–453/R–96–007 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations. 

61 FR–44050 8/27/96 ........ Control Techniques Guidelines for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Operations (Surface Coating). 

EPA–453/R–97–004 ........... Aerospace (CTG & MACT). 

EPA–453/R–06–003 ........... Control Techniques Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing. 

EPA–453/R–06–004 ........... Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling Coatings. 

EPA 453/R–07–003 ............ Control Techniques Guidelines for Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings. 

EPA 453/R–07–004 ............ Control Techniques Guidelines for Large Appliance Coatings. 

EPA 453/R–07–005 ............ Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings. 

EPA 453/R–08–005 ............ Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives. 

EPA 453/R–08–006 ............ Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings. 

EPA 453/R–08–003 ............ Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings (plastic parts portion only). 

EPA 453/B–16–001 ............ Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry. 

1 Negative declarations are for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 

On May 9, 2018 (83 FR 21235), the 

EPA proposed to approve YSAQMD’s 

negative declarations for the 1997 and 

2008 ozone NAAQS into the California 

SIP. We proposed to approve these 

negative declarations because we 

determined that they comply with the 

relevant CAA requirements. Our 

proposed action contains more 

information on the negative declarations 

and our evaluation. 

II. Public Comments and EPA 

Responses 

The EPA’s proposed action provided 

a 30-day public comment period. During 

this period, we received two anonymous 

comments that were outside the scope 

of this rulemaking. Neither of the 

comments were germane to our 

evaluation of YSAQMD’s negative 

declarations. 

III. EPA Action 

No comments were submitted that 

change our assessment of the suitability 

of the negative declarations in our 

proposed action and duplicated in Table 

1 above. Therefore, as authorized in 

section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is 

fully approving these negative 

declarations for the 1997 and 2008 

ozone NAAQS into the California SIP. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
31074 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 

submissions, the EPA’s role is to 

approve state choices, provided that 

they meet the criteria of the Clean Air 

Act. Accordingly, this action merely 

approves state law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 

FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory 

action because SIP approvals are 

exempted under Executive Order 12866; 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide the EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where the EPA or 

an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. The EPA will 

submit a report containing this action 

and other required information to the 

U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. A major rule cannot take effect 

until 60 days after it is published in the 

Federal Register. This action is not a 

‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by September 4, 

2018. Filing a petition for 

reconsideration by the Administrator of 

this final rule does not affect the finality 

of this action for the purposes of judicial 

review nor does it extend the time 

within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. This action may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: June 20, 2018. 

Michael Stoker, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart F—California 

■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(505) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.220 Identification of plan—in part. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(505) The following plan was 

submitted on November 13, 2017 by the 

Governor’s designee. 

(i) [Reserved] 

(ii) Additional materials. (A) YoloSolano Air Quality Management 

District. 

(1) Reasonably Available Control 

Technology (RACT) State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) Analysis: 

‘‘Table 3—CTG Categories for Which 

YSAQMD Will Adopt a Negative 

Declaration,’’ adopted on September 13, 

2017. 

■ 3. Section 52.222 is amended by 

adding paragraph (a)(14)(ii) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.222 Negative declarations. 

(a) * * * 

(14) * * * 

(ii) The following negative 

declarations are for the 1997 and 2008 

8-hour ozone NAAQS and were adopted 

by the District on September 13, 2017 

and submitted as part of Yolo-Solano 

AQMD’s RACT SIP on November 13, 

2017. 

CTG source category Negative declaration CTG reference document 

Aerospace ....................................... EPA–453/R–97–004 Aerospace (CTG & MACT). 

Automobile and Light-Duty Truck 

Assembly Coatings.

EPA–450/2–77–008 Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume II: 

Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks. 

Automobile and Light-Duty Truck 

Assembly Coatings.

EPA 453/R–08–006 Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings. 

Dry Cleaning ................................... EPA–450/3–82–009 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners. 

Flat Wood Paneling Coatings ......... EPA–450/2–78–032 Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume VII: 

Factory Surface Coating of Flat Wood Paneling. 

Flat Wood Paneling Coatings ......... EPA–453/R–06–004 Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling Coatings. 

Flexible Package Printing ............... EPA–453/R–06–003 Control Techniques Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 31075 

CTG source category Negative declaration CTG reference document 

Graphic Arts Rotogravure and Flexography.EPA–450/2–78–033 Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume VIII: 

Graphic Arts-Rotogravure and Flexography. 

Large Appliance Coating ................ EPA–450/2–77–034 Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume V: 

Surface Coating of Large Appliances. 

Large Appliance Coating ................ EPA 453/R–07–004 Control Techniques Guidelines for Large Appliance Coatings. 

Magnet Wire Coating ...................... EPA–450/2–77–033 Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume IV: 

Surface Coating of Insulation of Magnet Wire. 

Metal Can Coating; Metal Coil 

Coating.

EPA–450/2–77–008 Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume II: 

Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks. 

Metal Furniture Coatings ................ EPA–450/2–77–032 Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume III: 

Surface Coating of Metal Furniture. 

Metal Furniture Coatings ................ EPA 453/R–07–005 Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings. 

Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives EPA 453/R–08–005 Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives. 

Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic 

Parts.

EPA 453/R–08–003 Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings 

(plastic parts portion only). 

Natural Gas/Gasoline ...................... EPA–450/3–83–007 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Equipment Leaks from Natural Gas/Gasoline 

Processing Plants. 

Oil and Gas Industry ....................... EPA 453/B–16–001 Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry.

Paper and Fabric Coating ............... EPA–450/2–77–008 Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources—Volume II: 

Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks. 

Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings ....... EPA 453/R–07–003 Control Techniques Guidelines for Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings. 

Petroleum Liquid Storage Tanks .... EPA–450/2–77–036 Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Storage of Petroleum Liquids in Fixed-Roof 

Tanks. 

Resin Manufacturing ....................... EPA–450/3–83–008 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Manufacture of High-Density 

Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene Resins. 

Resin Manufacturing ....................... EPA–450/3–83–006 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Synthetic Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing Equipment. 

Pharmaceutical Products ................ EPA–450/2–78–029 Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products. 

Refineries ........................................ EPA–450/2–78–036 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment. 

Refineries ........................................ EPA–450/2–77–025 Control of Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, Wastewater Separators, and Process 

Unit Turnarounds. 

Rubber Tire Manufacturing ............. EPA–450/2–78–030 Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires. 

Ship Coatings .................................. 61 FR–44050 8/27/96 Control Techniques Guidelines for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Operations (Surface Coating). 

Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing.EPA–450/3–84–015 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in 

Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry. 

Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing.EPA–450/4–91–031 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry. 

Wood Furniture Coating .................. EPA–453/R–96–007 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Wood Furniture Manufacturing 

Operations. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2018–14197 Filed 7–2–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

44 CFR Part 64 

[Docket ID FEMA–2018–0002; Internal 

Agency Docket No. FEMA–8535] 

Suspension of Community Eligibility 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, DHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule identifies 

communities where the sale of flood 

insurance has been authorized under 

the National Flood Insurance Program 

(NFIP) that are scheduled for 

suspension on the effective dates listed 

within this rule because of 

noncompliance with the floodplain 

management requirements of the 

program. If the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA) receives 

documentation that the community has 

adopted the required floodplain 

management measures prior to the 

effective suspension date given in this 

rule, the suspension will not occur and 

a notice of this will be provided by 

publication in the Federal Register on a 

subsequent date. Also, information 

identifying the current participation 

status of a community can be obtained 

from FEMA’s Community Status Book 

(CSB). The CSB is available at https:// 

www.fema.gov/national-floodinsurance-program-community-statusbook. 

DATES: The effective date of each 

community’s scheduled suspension is 

the third date (‘‘Susp.’’) listed in the 

third column of the following tables. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you want to determine whether a 

particular community was suspended 

on the suspension date or for further 

information, contact Adrienne L. 

Sheldon, PE, CFM, Federal Insurance 

and Mitigation Administration, Federal 

Emergency Management Agency, 400 C 

Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 

212–3966. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP 

enables property owners to purchase 

Federal flood insurance that is not 

otherwise generally available from 

private insurers. In return, communities 

agree to adopt and administer local 

floodplain management measures aimed 

at protecting lives and new construction 

from future flooding. Section 1315 of 

the National Flood Insurance Act of 

1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022, 

prohibits the sale of NFIP flood 

insurance unless an appropriate public 

body adopts adequate floodplain 

management measures with effective 

enforcement measures. The 

communities listed in this document no 

longer meet that statutory requirement 

for compliance with program 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES