alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 239

Urging the President to withdraw all United States Armed Forces from

Somalia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 4, 1993

Mr. MICA (for himself, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. WELDON, Mr. BONILLA, Mr.

RAMSTAD, Mr. JACOBS, Mr. CRANE, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. WALSH, Mr.

POMBO, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. LIGHTFOOT, and Mr. ZELIFF) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign

Affairs

RESOLUTION

Urging the President to withdraw all United States Armed

Forces from Somalia.

Whereas United States Armed Forces made significant contributions to the United States-led force in Somalia

under Operation Restore Hope which established a secure

environment for the conduct of humanitarian relief operations in Somalia;

Whereas over 25,000 United States troops were deployed

under Operation Restore Hope and several of such troops

lost their lives;

Whereas, although originally projected to cost only

$200,000,000 to $300,000,000, the United States in-
2

•HRES 239 IH

curred nearly $800,000,0000 in costs in connection with

Operation Restore Hope;

Whereas on May 4, 1993 the United Nations assumed control

of peacekeeping operations in Somalia from the United

States;

Whereas more than 4,000 American troops remain in Somalia and the deployment of such troops incurs additional

costs each and every day to the United States; and

Whereas the United States is courting potential disaster in

Somalia with American troops being fired upon and suffering numerous casualties: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the President should withdraw all United

3 States Armed Forces from Somalia.

Æ
#### CHARLES B. ESHER, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. J. CALAF AND PAPA, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-861.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 3, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Eleanor A. G. CALLAHAN, Petitioner, v. COUNTY OF DADE, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42199.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 19, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 259 So.2d 504.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C
Inthe Matter ofAaron Goldring

DocketNo. FAA-201501317

Case No. 2015EA150014 Administrative LawJudge 

### I.E. Sullivan

COMPLAINANT'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

## 07 2016 

## 1\IG DOCr<ET

T11e Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the above-captioned case by its designated representatives withdraws the Complaint in this case. This request is made pursuant to Section 13.215 ofthe Rules ofPractice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions, 14 CFR, Part 13, Subpart G.

Date: 

## SEP 0 1 2016 Respectfully submitted, Patricia A. MeNall Acting Assistant ChiefCounsel

for Enforc- .ent
By: 

# f-ffFt-Hr.

Enforcemen D vision, Northeast Team I Aviation Pl a Jamaica, NY 11434 Email: Camille.Castillo@faa.gov Telephone: (718)553-3278 (direct) (718) 995-5699 (fax)

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certifY that on this day copies ofthe foregoing Complainant's Withdrawal ofComplaint were sent First Class mail and fax as follows: Judge J. E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (EI!-310) Washington, DC 20590 FAX: 202-366-7536 I hereby certifY that on this day copies ofthe foregoing Complainant's Withdrawal of Complaint were sent First Class mail, certified mail, Return Receipt Requested and Email as follows: 

### Mr. Aaron Goldring 1824 Hendrickson Street Brooklyn, NY 11234 Email: aaron@goldringtech.com
I hereby certifY that on this day copies ofthe foregoing Complainant's Withdrawal ofComplaintwere sent first class mail as follows: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430

Date: Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000


## SEP 0 12016



# ~~: Management and ProgramAnalyst Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434
EXHIBIT 10.1

                   Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                            as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of ASML Holding N.V. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Doug
Dunn, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Peter T.F.M. Wennink, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Doug J. Dunn
----------------------------------
Name:    Doug J. Dunn
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Date:    March 7, 2003


/s/ Peter T.F.M. Wennink
----------------------------------
Name: Peter T.F.M. Wennink
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:   March 7, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

GORDON C. REID, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

No. 17-6100 

(D.C. No. 5:12-CV-01416-M) 

(W.D. Okla.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________ 

Before BACHARACH, BALDOCK, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.**

_________________________________ 

Gordon C. Reid appeals the district court’s dismissal of his suit under the 

Federal Tort Claims Act for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The United States has 

filed a Motion for Voluntary Remand explaining that it recently discovered that the 

record it provided to the district court was incomplete. The government states that it 

will withdraw the motion to dismiss it filed below and proceed with a new motion on 

 * This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines 

of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for 

its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. ** On October 15, 2018 the court issued an order vacating the oral argument 

hearing originally set for November 13, 2018. After examining the Motion for 

Voluntary Remand and response this panel has determined unanimously that oral 

argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered 

submitted without oral argument. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

October 26, 2018

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
2 

the full record or with discovery. Further, the government will ask the district court 

to appoint counsel for Mr. Reid. 

Mr. Reid has filed a response to the motion agreeing that the case must be 

remanded given the government’s discovery as to the record and joining the 

government’s suggestion that counsel be appointed in the district court. Given the 

circumstances of the government’s motion, Mr. Reid also asks this court to consider 

waiving the filing fee for this appeal. 

The filing fee is prescribed by statute, and we have no authority to waive it. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) (providing that a prisoner appealing a civil case “shall be 

required to pay the full amount of a filing fee”). Consequently, we deny Mr. Reid’s 

request to be relieved of his obligation to make partial payments towards that fee. Id. 

The government’s Motion for Voluntary Remand is granted. This matter is 

fully remanded to the district court with instructions to vacate its judgment dated 

March 28, 2017 and to conduct any and all proceedings necessary for a full review of 

all of Mr. Reid’s claims in light of the government’s representation that it will 

withdraw its motion to dismiss. In addition, given the government’s statement that it 

will ask the district court to appoint counsel for Mr. Reid, the district court is 

strongly encouraged to consider the appointment of counsel. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

Entered for the Court 

Per Curiam
House Calendar No. 24

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 142

[Report No. 103–47]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI

tion reported from the Committee on Rules.with respect to consideration of a certain resoluMARCH 30, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 24

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 142

[Report No. 103–47]

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to consideration

of a certain resolution reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 30, 1993

Mr. BEILENSON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect

to consideration of a certain resolution reported from

the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule

2 XI for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to a resolution reported

5 on the legislative day of March 31, 1993, providing for

6 consideration of a conference report to accompany the con7 current resolution (H. Con. Res. 64) setting forth the con-
2

HR 142 RH

1 gressional budget for the United States Government for

2 the fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998.
Order entered October 10, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00224-CR

SYLVIA RENE WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-81042-10

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s October 7, 2013 motion to extend time to file her reply 

brief. We ORDER the reply brief received on October 1, 2013 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
#### Patrick C. BUCKLEY, a minor, Appellant, v. Michael R. MILLER and Allstate Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 69-794.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 8, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Feb 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                          UT
<CIK> 0000053456
<NAME> JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                                 US DOLLARS


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                 PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   1,818,982
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                   519,968
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        406,870
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    3,098,875
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              5,844,695
<COMMON>                                      153,713
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                     510,769
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                           718,994  <F1>
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              1,383,476
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         198,167  <F2>
<PREFERRED>                                    12,649
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        1,133,820
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  10,846
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               44,957
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              3,060,780
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               5,844,695
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     452,745
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                0
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    356,750
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    356,750
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        95,995
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              5,648
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                101,643
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       25,743  <F3>
<NET-INCOME>                                   45,570  <F4>
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     2,461
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  43,109
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       45,000  <F5>
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      95,397
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        149,642
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<FN>

<F1> INCLUDES ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME OF $7.
<F2> INCLUDES AMOUNT FOR COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
<F2> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $125,000.
<F3> INCLUDES AMOUNT FOR COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
<F3> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $2,675.
<F4> AMOUNT IS NET OF INCOME TAX EXPENSE OF $30,330.
<F5> REPRESENTS COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS PAID TO PARENT CORPORATION.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Bodegard Mitchell, Appellant, *v.*Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Appellee.

*502Argued March 6, 1975,

before Judges Crumlish, Jr., Kramer and Rogers, sitting as a panel of three.

*Stephen R. Krone,*for appellant.

*Charles G. Hasson,*Assistant Attorney General, with him *Sydney Reuben,*Assistant Attorney General, and *Robert P. Kane,*Attorney General, for appellee.

April 23, 1975:

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

This is a direct administrative appeal by a claimant from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirming a denial of an interstate benefits claim on the ground that claimant had voluntarily terminated his employment with a Pennsylvania employer without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature under section 402(b) (1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5,1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, *as amended,*43 P.S. §802(b)(1). Claimant’s admitted conduct of jumping ship to attend to his hospitalized brother in California brings him within our recent decision in *Crumbling v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review,*14 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 546, 322 A. 2d 746 (1974). We held in Crumbling that section 402(b)(1) must be construed together with section 402(b) (2), 43 P.S. §802 (b)(2), rendering ineligible a claimant voluntarily terminating his or her employment *503for marital, filial or domestic obligations or circumstances, so that a voluntary termination to care for sick family members will not constitute cause of a necessitous or compelling nature under section 402(b) (1). As we indicated in *Crumbling,*we are bound by the expressed will of the Legislature.

Order

And Now, this 23rd day of April, 1975, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review is affirmed.
#### FORTE AND TABLADA, INC. v. CITY OF PLAQUEMINE.

No. 62350.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 2, 1978.

In re: City of Plaquemine applying for supervisory writs. Parish of Iberville. 358 So.2d 684.

Writ denied and stay order recalled.
#### MATTHEW MACKLIN, et al., Road Commissioners of W. C. Creek Hundred, *vs.*JOHN RUTH, et al.

*3*udgment by default, in an action on a bond with a collateral condition, admits a cause of action ; and the execution need not be proved on inquiry of the damages.

This was an action against the defendant John Ruth and the others, his sureties, as collector of road taxes for W. C. Creek hundred, New Castle County.

The declaration was on a lost bond; and the defendant suffeted judgment to go by default, and an order was made in the nature of a writ of inquiry to charge the jury attending at this term, to inquire of the damages, &c.

The jury were sworn “well and truly to inquire, and true inquisition make and return, of the damages and costs sustained by the plaintiff on occasion of the breaches of the condition of the writing obligatory assigned in the declaration in this cause,” &c.

*Mr. Rogers*

opened to the jury, and stated that as a judgment had been rendered by default, he should proceed to show the damages without any proof of the bond, or of its loss; as the judgment by default admits the cause of action.

*Mr. Gray,*who now appeared for the defendant,

insisted that the plaintiff was bound to produce the bond, or prove its loss. (2 *Saund. Pl. & Ev.*90; 3 *Term Rep.*301.)

*88*Rogers,*for plaintiffs.

*Gray,*for defendants.

*The Court*

thought there was no analogy between this case and the one cited of an action on a promissory note, which is of itself evidence of the debt, and therefore, its production necessary. But this is an action on a bond with a collateral condition; which, if produced, would have no effect in proving or disproving the matter now to be tried, which is the amount of damages occasioned by breach of the condition of the bond. This breach must be proved independently of the bond; the existence of which is admitted by the judgment by default, which admits a cause of action; to what amount must be the subject of proof.

The jury made and returned an inquisition in the case, assessing the damages and costs at $529 61.
# March 2019

# image1.png
Robert H. Baldwin
   President                
                                 BELLAGIO


April 21, 1998



Mr. Stephen A. Wynn
Chairman of the Board, President
 and Chief Executive Officer
Mirage Resorts, Incorporated
3400 Las Vegas Boulevard South
Las Vegas, Nevada  89109

Dear Steve:

This confirms the agreement this date between Bellagio and you with respect
to the work of fine art entitled "Femme Assise" by Pablo Picasso (1949, oil
on  canvas,  51-1/4 x 38-1/4 inches) (the "Work"), which you purchased from
an independent party on April 7, 1998 at a purchase price of $2,500,000.

     1.   The  January 14, 1998 agreement between Bellagio and you, as sub-
sequently  amended (the "Original Agreement"), is hereby amended to provide
that, effective this date, the Exhibit `B' Art referenced therein which you
are renting to Bellagio shall include the Work.

     2.   The  terms of  the rental  of the Work shall be the same as those
set forth in the  Original Agreement  with respect  to the Exhibit `B' Art,
except  that  the  annual  rental  for the  Work, payable  in equal monthly
installments in advance, shall be $30,000.

     3.   The  Work  shall  be  maintained  on public display and  shall be
available  for educational  purposes in  any hotel-casino  operated  by any
wholly owned  subsidiary of Mirage Resorts, Incorporated in conformity with
the  requirements  of  NRS  361.068(k)  and  NRS  374  and  any regulations
promulgated thereunder.

                               Exhibit 10.1
<PAGE>
Mr. Stephen A. Wynn
Mirage Resorts, Incorporated
April 21, 1998
Page Two

Please sign below to confirm your agreement to the foregoing.  My signature
below confirms Bellagio's agreement thereto.

Very truly yours,

BELLAGIO


By:  ROBERT H. BALDWIN
     -------------------
     ROBERT H. BALDWIN
     President and Chief Executive Officer

I hereby agree to the foregoing.

     STEPHEN A. WYNN
     -------------------
     STEPHEN A. WYNN


cc:  Bruce A. Levin
     Peter C. Walsh
     James E. Pettis

                P.O. BOX 7700, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA  89177-7770
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US$
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1.00
<CASH>                                             876,805
<SECURITIES>                                     1,246,875
<RECEIVABLES>                                      292,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (25,000)
<INVENTORY>                                        843,868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,318,380
<PP&E>                                             884,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (279,746)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,950,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              634,946
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            52,937
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,899,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,950,190
<SALES>                                          2,399,579
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,559,678
<CGS>                                            1,371,525
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,371,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,254,178
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (50,800)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,116,825)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,116,825)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,116,825)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.21)
        


</TABLE>