alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
I, Jack Friedman, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive    Officer of Friedman Industries, Incorporated, a Texas    corporation, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Friedman Industries, Incorporated;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

          b) [intentionally omitted per SEC release 33-8238]

          c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

          d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

          a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: February 14, 2005 /s/  JACK FRIEDMAN Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          UT
<CIK> 0000053456
<NAME> JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                                 US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                 PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   2,122,465
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                   251,627
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        536,470
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    3,284,242
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              6,194,804
<COMMON>                                      153,713
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                     510,769
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                           768,169  <F1>
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              1,432,651
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         176,500  <F2>
<PREFERRED>                                    12,649
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        1,133,940
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                            163,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      13
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      10,833
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              3,265,218
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               6,194,804
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   1,547,940
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                0
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  1,216,557
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  1,216,557
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                       331,383
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             20,587
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                351,970
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       77,448  <F3>
<NET-INCOME>                                  182,797  <F4>
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     5,513
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                 177,284
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      130,000  <F5>
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      93,319
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        219,689
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME OF $7.
<F2> INCLUDES AMOUNT FOR COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
<F2> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $125,000.
<F3> INCLUDES AMOUNT FOR COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
<F3> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $8,025.
<F4> AMOUNT IS NET OF INCOME TAX EXPENSE OF $91,725.
<F5> REPRESENTS COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS PAID TO PARENT CORPORATION.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  Exhibit 10.6.1

                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

              TALX CORPORATION OUTSIDE DIRECTORS' STOCK OPTION PLAN

On May 15, 2001, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors reviewed
and approved a special stock option award to Outside Directors of 1,000 shares
effective May 1, 2001 at the closing price of the stock on that date and an
adjustment to the annual award to 2,500 shares. The Board of Directors approved
all recommendations of the Compensation Committee on May 15, 2001.




                                       12
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  905,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,700
<INVENTORY>                                     50,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               986,600
<PP&E>                                      10,114,300
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,717,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,389,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,279,100
<BONDS>                                      1,770,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,200
<PREFERRED>                                     15,200
<COMMON>                                       978,300
<OTHER-SE>                                     514,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,389,100
<SALES>                                        767,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               767,100
<CGS>                                          256,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  516,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                210,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                    79,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            130,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   130,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Robert Alton HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Daniel VASQUEZ, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 90-55402.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 20, 1992.

Before: ALARCON, BRUNETTI, and NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In a motion filed on April 18, 1992, Appellant, Robert Alton Harris, asks this *1450court to recall its mandate issued on March 10, 1992, following the denial by the United States Supreme Court of petition for a writ of certiorari. Appellant also petitions this court to grant a rehearing and suggests a rehearing en banc.

Appellant’s motion for recall of the mandate is denied. Appellant has not shown, as required by *Zipfel v. Halliburton Co.,*861 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*486 U.S. 1054, 108 S.Ct. 2819, 100 L.Ed.2d 921 (1988), that exceptional circumstances justify a recall of the mandate.

The Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc also is denied as untimely. *See Adamson v. Lewis,*955 F.2d 614 (9th Cir.1992) (en banc); Fed.R.App.P. 40. We previously stated, in our order denying Petitioner’s motion for stay of mandate and petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc, filed on March 6, 1992, that no future petition for rehearing would be entertained. *See*Fed.R.App.P. 41(b).

NOONAN, Circuit Judge, would grant the motion fpr recall of the mandate, and the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 6592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02301]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-NN06-15-OAR]

Notification of a Public Webinar for the Clean Air Act Advisory 
Committee (CAAAC)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announces a public 
webinar for the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC) on EPA's 
greenhouse gas standards (i.e., the Clean Air Act 111(d) standards). 
The EPA established the CAAAC on November 19, 1990, to provide 
independent advice and counsel to EPA on policy issues associated with 
implementation of the Clean Air Act of 1990. The Committee advises on 
economic, environmental, technical, scientific and enforcement policy 
issues.

Dates & Addresses:  Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. App. 2 Section 10(a) (2), 
notice is hereby given that the CAAAC will hold a webinar on EPA's 
greenhouse gas standards (i.e., the Clean Air Act 111(d) standards) on 
February 20, 2014, from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).
    Inspection of Committee Documents: Documents prepared for the 
meeting will be publicly available on the CAAAC Web site at http://www.epa.gov/oar/caaac/ prior to the meeting. Thereafter, these 
documents will be available by contacting the Office of Air and 
Radiation Docket and requesting information under docket EPA-HQ-OAR-
2004-0075. The Docket office can be reached by email at: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov or FAX: 202-566-9744.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any member of the public who wants 
further information concerning the CAAAC's public webinar may contact 
Jeneva Craig, Designated Federal Officer (DFO), Office of Air and 
Radiation, U.S. EPA by telephone at (202) 564-1674 or by email at 
craig.jeneva@epa.gov. Additional information on these meetings can be 
found on the CAAAC Web site: http://www.epa.gov/oar/caaac/.
    For information on access or services for individuals with 
disabilities, please contact Ms. Jeneva Craig at (202) 564-1674 or 
craig.jeneva@epa.gov, preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting 
to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: January 28, 2014.
Jeneva Craig,
Designated Federal Officer, Clean Air Act Advisory Committee, Office of 
Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2014-02301 Filed 2-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-88805) pertaining to the Borders Group, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-79559) pertaining to the
Borders Group, Inc. Management Stock Purchase Plan, Borders Group, Inc. Stock
Option Plan, Borders Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Borders Group,
Inc. Director Stock Plan, Borders Group, Inc. 401(k) Plan, and Borders Group,
Inc. Savings Plan for Employees Working in Puerto Rico of our report dated March
11, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Borders
Group, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
January 26, 2003.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Detroit, Michigan
April 7, 2003
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

JOHNSTON INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
(in thousands except per share amounts)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The weighted average number of common and common share equivalents on a primary
basis are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        For the Three Months Ended             For the Six Months Ended
                                                       -------------------------------       ------------------------------
                                                           July 3,           July 4,            July 3,           July 4,
                                                            1999              1998               1999              1998
                                                       --------------    -------------       -------------    -------------
<S>                                                    <C>               <C>                 <C>              <C>
Weighted average common shares outstanding                     10,722           10,743              10,722           10,743

Shares issued from assumed exercise of
     incentive stock options (1) (2)                              ---              ---                 ---              ---

Shares issued from assumed exercise of
     nonqualified stock options (1) (2)                           ---              ---                 ---              ---
                                                       --------------    -------------       -------------    -------------
Weighted average number of common and common
     equivalent shares outstanding as adjusted                 10,722           10,743              10,722           10,743
                                                       ==============    =============       =============    =============




Net loss                                               $       (1,905)   $        (568)      $      (3,652)   $      (1,503)
                                                       ==============    =============       =============    =============

Net loss per common share:

     Basic and diluted                                 $        (.18)    $        (.05)      $        (.34)   $        (.14)
                                                       ==============    =============       =============    =============
</TABLE>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1)      Shares issued from assumed exercise of options included the number of
         incremental shares which result from applying the "treasury stock
         method" for options.

(2)      For the three months and six months ended July 3, 1999 and July 4,
         1998, common shares from assumed exercise of stock options are not
         presented as they are antidilutive due to net losses.
Jul 28 2010

Mr. Daniel Gallo 19 Coy Trail Conway, AR 72032

Dear Mr. Gallo:

We have received your July 16, 2010, correspondence withdrawing your March 1, 2010, petition for rulemaking, until you revise your original petition.

Your letter has been placed in the public docket (No. FAA-2010-0231). No further action will be taken on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division
# Official Journal C 55/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 55 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6416 February 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 55

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6416 February 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2021/C 55/01 | Notification by the European Union made in accordance with the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2021/C 55/01

Notification by the European Union made in accordance with the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Hipolito F. Garcia Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse

The Hipolito F. Garcia Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse is located 615 East Houston Street in San Antonio's central business district near the Alamo. The building was named after Federal District Court Judge Garcia who passed away in January of 2002.  

Built in 1937, the building is a six-story, neo-classical, Beaux-Arts style federal building with over 230,000 rentable square feet. Learn more about the historical information of this building, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

A major renovation project worth over $30 million is planned for completion in 2010. This project will make the building more usable for occupants. After the project is completed, the San Antonio Post Office and Courthouse will house the Bankruptcy Courts, executive agencies, and the U.S. Post Office.

 

##           Contacts    

**Greater West Service Center - Corpus Christi/San Antonio**

**210-306-2953

Print PageEmail Page

Top

-  Region 7 | Greater Southwest-  Overview 
-  About Region 7 
-  Buildings and Facilities    -  Arkansas 
  -  Louisiana 
  -  New Mexico 
  -  Oklahoma 
  -  Texas      -  Bridge of the Americas Land Port of Entry 
    -  Brownsville Federal Building and Courthouse 
    -  Brownsville-Gateway Land Port of Entry 
    -  Corpus Christi Federal Courthouse 
    -  Fritz G. Lanham Federal Building 
    -  Galveston U.S. Post Office and Courthouse 
    -  Hipolito F. Garcia Federal Bldg and U.S. Courthse 
    -  Homer Thornberry Building 
    -  J.J. Pickle Federal Building 
    -  Jack Brooks Federal Building 
    -  J. Marvin Jones Federal Building and Mary Lou Robinson United States Courthouse 
    -  La Branch Federal Building 
    -  Mickey Leland Federal Building 
    -  San Antonio Federal Complex 
    -  Santa Fe Federal Building 
    -  San Antonio U.S. Courthouse 
    -  U.S. Land Port of Entry at Laredo, TX 
    -  U.S. Land Port of Entry at Columbus, NM 
  -  Greenville MS U.S. Courthouse 
-  Products and Services 
-  Region 7 Newsroom 
-  Regional Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization 
-  Donations Program
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas EmissionsMeeting Documentation NEDA- CAP 1/13/2011Date Regional StaffContactInformation(Name, email,phone #)Name of Organization (Attachlist of all attendees names andemails if possible)Summary of Discussion(e.g., applicability, reportingrequirements, etc.)WrittenCommentsProvided?Did they alsosubmit to Docket?Date sentto EPACCD1/13/2011Jessica GordonGordon.jessica@epa.govJennifer BohmanBohman.jennifer@epa.govKatherine SiboldSibold.katherine@epa.govRob Kaufman, VP, KochPublic SectorsDon Clay, Consultant toKoch IndustriesLaura Matthews, EHSDirector, InvistaMatt Iwiki, Counsel, BoeingMike Palazzolo, Director,EHS, ALCOAJerry Fulmer, counsel,ALCOALinda Farrington, Manager,Corporate Air Issues, EliLillyMaxine Dewbury, Manager,Corporate Air Issues, Procter& GambleAl Collins, VP, EHS,Occidental Petroleum Corp.Barbara Bankoff, Eli LillyCBI deferral and call for information:(1) Whether to focus on industry sectors in makingcomments, or individual companies' experiences andsensitivities, means of protecting data, etc.(2) How best to use other EPA environmentalprograms as examples of alternative verificationtechniques(3) What level of specificity will EPA need withrespect to examplesof "sensitive CBI" inputs into calculations, thecalculations themselves, and how that information canbe used to derive sensitive information by domesticand international competitors(4) Detail needed to document/back-up assertions bythe FTC in itscomments and whether EPA is pursuing this with FTCitself(5) Whether suggestions about data capture throughelectronic reporting tool and utilizing confidentialityprotocols is relevant in this rulemaking: I think weconcluded this is an all ornothing proposition, so thatif the data is collected this is issue is not relevantbecause EPA currently regards this information as"emissions related" and would not keep it CBI.No N/aDoug Deason, ManagerCorp. Air Issues, ExxonMobilCorp.Jan Laughlin, Manager,Corp Air Issues,ConocoPhillipsAnnabeth Reinert, NewPageSteve Zuiss, Air Manager,InvistaSteve Woock, WeyerhaeuserCorp.Melissa Antoine, SeniorEnvironmental Engineer,Georgia PacificLeslie Ritts, Counsel toNEDA/CAP
# United States Co urt o f Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
May 23, 2003 

### Before
Hon . W ILLIAM J. B AUER , Circuit Judge 

### Hon . F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK , Circuit Judge 

### Hon . ANN C LAIRE W ILLIAMS , Circuit Judge

S TEVEN MARTIN and T AMMY S TOLKA , Plaintiffs-Appellants , 

### No . 02-1135 v. D ONALD N. S NYDER , J R ., et al ., Defendants-Appellees . Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. No. 01-1118 Harold A. Baker, Judge .

Order The opinion of this court issued on May 23, 2003, is amended as follows: Page 2, eighth line from the bottom, change “legitimation” to “welfare”.
#### Bertram N. BERGER and Roberta Berger, his wife, Appellants, v. STATE FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, a Florida corporation, and National Rug Cleaners, Inc., Appellees.

No. 69-666.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 3, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.