alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-02856) pertaining to the LifeRate Systems, Inc. 1993 Stock
Option Plan, as amended, in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-06783) pertaining to the LifeRate Systems, Inc. Employee Stock Option Plan
and in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-04939) dated June 21,
1996, of our report dated February 27, 1998, except as to note 4 as to which
the date is November 2, 1998, with respect to the financial statements of 
LifeRate Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the 
year ended November 5, 1998.

                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 25, 1998

32
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
           [KIRKPATRICK, PHILLIPS & MILLER LETTERHEAD APPEARS HERE]

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                        -------------------------------

We have issued our report dated November 3, 1998, accompanying the consolidated 
financial statements incorporated by reference in the Annual Report of NS&L 
Bancorp, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ending September 30, 1998. We hereby 
consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the registration 
statement of NS&L Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-1566, effective 
February 21, 1996).

                                 /s/ Kirkpatrick, Phillips & Miller, CPA'S, P.C.
                                 ----------------------------------------------

                                     KIRKPATRICK, PHILLIPS & MILLER, CPA'S, P.C.


December 24, 1998
Springfield, Missouri
H. Res. 206

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

July 30, 1993.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2150) to authorize appropriations for fiscal

year 1994 for the United States Coast Guard, and for other

purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman

and ranking minority member of the Committee on Merchant

Marine and Fisheries. After general debate the bill shall be

considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall

be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on

Merchant Marine and Fisheries now printed in the bill. The

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be

considered by title rather than by section. Each title shall be
2

HRES 206 EH

considered as read. Points of order against the committee

amendment in the nature of a substitute for failure to comply

with clause 5(a) of rule XXI are waived. At the conclusion

of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee

shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand

a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in

the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee

amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### RUST, WELLS & HITCH *vs.*EDWARD PRITCHETT.

The sheriff is bound to execute process against the same defendant in the order it is received by him.

Foreign attachment.

The writ of attachment was placed in the sheriff’s hands, with orders to close the defendant’s store; he went to the store to shut it up, and was in the store waiting for the key, when the writ of fieri facias was placed in his hands. He sold the goods and brought the *261proceeds into court; when the execution creditor moved to take it out.

*Mr. Laws*argued the case for the execution creditors; Messrs. *Bates*and *Smithers,*for the attachment creditors, declined to argue it.

*The*Court.

The seizure under the attachment was made when the sheriff entered the store with the writ to execute it. Whilst he was waiting for the key, it was not competent for another creditor to slip in an execution, so as to be ahead of the attachment.

If two writs be placed in the sheriff’s hands on the same day, he is bound to levy or execute first that which was first delivered to him.

Rule discharged.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00316-CR

STANLEY YARBOROUGH,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 12th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 23,744

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due on June 12, 2015. Appellant’s counsel was 

appointed on June 30, 2015. Notwithstanding counsel’s representation that no 

extensions to file the brief have been received, on July 10, 2015, the Court extended the 

time to file appellant’s brief to August 10, 2015. Appellant is now requesting an 

additional 90 day extension to file appellant’s brief.

Appellant’s motion is granted in part. The time to file appellant’s brief is 

extended to September 30, 2015.
Yarborough v. State Page 2

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted in part

Order issued and filed August 27, 2015
254 La. 783

#### Laura T. FRAME, Individually and for and on behalf of the Minors Annie Lillian Frame, Stacy Lynn Frame and Earl Edward Frame, Jr. v. Billy MAJORS and the Travelers Insurance Company.

No. 49954.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 8, 1969.

In re: Laura T. Frame, etc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 224 So.2d 65.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law.

FOURNET, C. J., and BARHAM, J., are of the opinion a writ should be granted in this case. The appellate court obviously failed to properly apply the law to the facts.

We agree the sting of the insect that occurred during the course of decedent’s employment did not cause the thrombosis from which he died. However, the facts clearly show, as testified to by defendant’s expert, Dr. Harvey, the stenosis from which the employee suffered at the time of the accident was *aggravated*by the “sting” to such an extent paralysis resulted, continuing until death. The operation that brought on the thrombosis that caused the death was performed to relieve the pressure on the affected artery, and, in this manner, to relieve the paralysis. In other words, the paralysis was the direct result of the accident and the operation undertaken to relieve the paralysis caused the thrombosis that resulted in the employee’s death. See, Behan v. John B. Honor Co., 143 La. 348, *78*So. 589, L.R.A. 1918 F., 862; Jackson v. Travelers’ Ins. Co., 180 La. 43, 156 So. 169; Hemphill v. Tremont Lbr. Co., 209 La. 885, 25 So. 2d 625; and Bertrand v. Coal Operators Casualty Co., 253 La. 1115, 221 So.2d 816.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Frontier Internet, Inc.
(f/k/a Fremont Corporation) (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the periods
ended: March 31, 2002; June 30, 2002; and September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alex
Gonzalez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Wireless Frontier Internet, Inc. and will be retained by
Wireless Frontier Internet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

May 27, 2004                        /s/ Alex Gonzalez
                                    -----------------
                                  Alex Gonzalez
                                    Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 395 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 395

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 23, 1994.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 4092) to control and prevent crime. The first reading of the bill 
shall be dispensed with. All points of order against the bill and against its 
consideration are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 
not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. After general debate the 
Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion. No further consideration of 
the bill shall be in order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House. 
The requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI for a two-thirds vote to consider a 
report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House 
is waived with respect to a resolution reported on or before the legislative day 
of March 23, 1994, providing for further consideration or disposition of the 
bill.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# Official Journal L 179I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 179I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 623 July 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 179I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 623 July 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | European Council Decision (EU) 2019/1135 of 2 July 2019 electing the President of the European Council | 1 |
| | * | European Council Decision (EU) 2019/1136 of 2 July 2019 proposing to the European Parliament a candidate for President of the European Commission | 2 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

European Council Decision (EU) 2019/1135 of 2 July 2019 electing the President of the European Council

1

*

European Council Decision (EU) 2019/1136 of 2 July 2019 proposing to the European Parliament a candidate for President of the European Commission

2

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Willie A. McDOWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-204.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 19, 1973.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on *194appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. Hunt v. State (Fla.1956) 87 So.2d 584.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-01-1998
<CASH>                                         925,700
<SECURITIES>                                 1,370,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                  902,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    119,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,622,400
<PP&E>                                      10,648,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,085,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,962,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,048,400
<BONDS>                                      1,164,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,612,400
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,137,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,962,200
<SALES>                                      1,364,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,558,500
<CGS>                                        1,093,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,545,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               535,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             112,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (555,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (556,600)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (556,600)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 263 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 263

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 29, 1993.
    Resolved, That points of order against consideration of the bill (H.R. 3116) 
making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1994, and for other purposes, for failure to comply with clause 7 
of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of the bill, all points of order 
against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule 
XXI are waived except as follows: beginning with ``Provided'' on page 20, line 
17, through ``operations:'' on page 21, line 21; beginning on page 27, line 23, 
through line 25; beginning on page 108, line 20, through page 109, line 5; and 
beginning on page 114, line 3, through page 115, line 10. Where points of order 
are waived against only part of a paragraph, a point of order against matter in 
the balance of the paragraph may be applied only within the balance of the 
paragraph and not against the entire paragraph. Points of order under clause 2 
of rule XXI against the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on 
Rules accompanying this resolution are waived.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### WM. D. ANDREWS, agent, d. b. app’lt. *ats.*ALLEN, et al., owners of the schooner Gen. Harrison, pl’ffs. b. respdts.

An agent is liable on his own contract, though his principal be known.

The nonjoinder of proper defendants must be pleaded in abatement.

This was an appeal from the judgment of a Justice of the Peace. Narr., in assumpsit, on the usual counts, and pn a special contract of affreightment. Pleas, non-assumpsit, payment, set-off, discount and act of limitation.

The ship Walter was wrecked near Indian river, in Oct. 1844, *453Wm. Andrews for Nahum Andrews, who had a contract to save the goods, employed captain Allen of the schooner General Harrison, to convey goods from the ship to Philadelphia for $125, and $10 a day for demurrage. Captain Allen was detained at Philadelphia by the revenue officers several days. The consignee paid the freight, and referred the matter of demurrage to Andrews himself.

Layton, for defendants,

moved a nonsuit, 1st. Because the action was brought against an agent, where the principal was known. Where the agent discloses his principal, the only remedy is against the principal. (1 *Chit. Pl.*25, 74; 15 East 62-6; 15 *Ves.*352; *Paley P. & A.*246; 3 *Camp.*817; 2 *M.*& *S.*438.) 2d. Because the evidence showed a *joint*contract of Wm. and Nahum Andrews. 3d. Because the contract was in writing, and could be proved only by the bill of lading, which fixes the freight at $125, without any reservation for demurrage. (17 *Law Lib.*103-5; *Smith on Merc. Law*173-5.)

*The Court*

refused the motion: 1st. An agent contracting personally, is personally liable, though his agency be known, and the principal be disclosed. (2 *Kent’s Com.*630; 1 *Saund. Pl. & Ev.*82, 72.)

2d. If this be a joint contract, it is not a ground for a non-suit. That must be pleaded in abatement. It is no less the contract of W. D. Andrews because it is also the contract of N. Andrews. And if a defendant would object, that not only he, *454but others, made the contract, he must plead it. Not so of a plaintiff. He knows with whom the contract was made.

*Houston,*for plaintiff.

*Layton,*for defendant.

3d. The third ground depends on evidence yet to be produced by the defendant, and cannot be any reason for a nonsuit.

Verdict for plaintiff.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated Program Project Applications (P01).                    

*Date:*                         July 18, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Priti Mehrotra, Ph.D., Chief, Immunology Review Branch Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, Room #3G40 National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC 9823, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 240-669-5066,                         *pmehrotra@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 27, 2018.

Natasha M. Copeland,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-14218 Filed 7-2-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Richard G. NAAS.

No. 62574.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Richard G. Naas applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Ouachita.

Writ denied. Adequate remedy by review in the event of conviction.
**EXHIBIT 99.3**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**FIA Card Services, National Association**

**BA Master Credit Card Trust II**

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of FIA Card Services, National Association (the "Bank"), as Servicer pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 20, 2006 (as amended from time to time, the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") by and between the Bank and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (the "Trustee") does hereby            certify that:

| 1. | The Bank is Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trustee. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.05 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | A review of the Servicer's activities during the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2009 and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such twelve-month period. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 17th day of September 2009.

 

By:   /s/  Elizabeth S. Buie                             

Name:  Elizabeth S. Buie

|   | Title:   | Senior Vice President |
|--------|--------------------|-----------------------|