alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
House Calendar No. 105

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 283

[Report No. 103–308]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference re1994, and for other purposes. trict for the fiscal year ending September 30, whole or in part against the revenues of said Dis- of Columbia and other activities chargeable in appropriations for the government of the District port to accompany the bill (H.R. 2492) making

OCTOBER 26, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 105

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 283

[Report No. 103–308]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 2492) making appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in part

against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September

30, 1994, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 1993

Mr. DERRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 2492) making appropriations

for the government of the District of Columbia and other

activities chargeable in whole or in part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September

30, 1994, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That all points of order against the con2 ference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2492) making

3 appropriations for the government of the District of Co-
2

HRES 283 RH

1 lumbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in part

2 against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year

3 ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes, are

4 waived. The motions printed in the joint explanatory state5 ment of the committee of conference to dispose of amend6 ments in disagreement shall be considered as read.
257 La. 861

#### VALLEY LAND CORPORATION v. Garland FIELDER.

No. 51171.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1971.

In re: Valley Land Corporation applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 242 So.2d 358.

Writ denied. The result is correct.

DIXON, J.,

dissents from refusal.
|                                                 |   |              |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|
| SUBSIDIARIES                                         |   | JURISDICTION      |
|                                                 |   |              |
| SkillSoft      Corporation                           |   | Delaware          |
| SkillSoft      Ireland Ltd                           |   | Ireland           |
| SkillSoft      UK Limited                            |   | England           |
| SkillSoft      Asia Pacific Pty Ltd                  |   | Australia         |
| Books24x7.com,      Inc.                             |   | Massachusetts     |
| SkillSoft      Finance Limited                       |   | Grand      Cayman |
| CBT      Technology Limited                          |   | Ireland           |
| SkillSoft      Canada Limited                        |   | Canada            |
| SmartForce      Business Skills Ltd                  |   | Ireland           |
| SmartCertify      Direct, Inc.                       |   | Florida           |
| SkillSoft      New Zealand Ltd                       |   | New      Zealand  |
| SkillSoft      France SARL                           |   | France            |
| SkillSoft      Asia Pacific PTE Ltd                  |   | Singapore         |
| Targeted      Learning Corporation                   |   | Maine             |
| NETg      GmbH                                       |   | Germany           |
| NETg      Australia Pty Limited                      |   | Australia         |
| SkillSoft      NETg Limited                          |   | England           |
| Wave      Technologies Limited                       |   | England           |
| NETg      SA (France)                                |   | France            |
|  SS      Software Service India Private Limited |   |  India       |
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: March 24, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Elyse Steiner, OAQPS

SUBJECT: Meeting with Fuel Cell Energy to discuss the Clean Power Plan

SUMMARY

Meeting with Fuel Cell Energy to discuss the Clean Power Plan. The Clean Power Plan 

for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014 and published in the Federal Register on 

June 18, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Attendees: Chip Bottone, FCE

Frank Wolak, FCE

Bruce Meredith, Bruce Meredith, Inc.

Elyse Steiner, EPA

Kevin Culligan, EPA

Mark DeFigueiredo, EPA
#### John MADDEN et al., Appellants, v. GULF POWER COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. N-474.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 21, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.2









CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM










The Board of Directors


Hyperdynamics Corporation


Sugar Land, Texas







We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 12, 2006 (File No. 333-130976); the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2008 (File No. 333-149774); and the Registration Statement
on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 23, 2008 (File No. 333-148287), of our report dated September 29, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2009 and for the year then ended, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hyperdynamics Corporation.







/s/ GBH CPAS, PC





GBH CPAS, PC


www.gbhcpas.com


Houston, Texas





September 29, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                          UT
<CIK> 0000053456
<NAME> JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                                 US DOLLARS


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                 PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   1,817,546
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                   542,951
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        454,331
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    2,980,832
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              5,795,660
<COMMON>                                      153,713
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                     510,769
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                           711,767  <F1>
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              1,376,249
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         176,500  <F2>
<PREFERRED>                                    12,649
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        1,133,880
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      13
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      10,833
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               39,086
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              3,046,450
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               5,795,660
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     942,895
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                0
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    747,347
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    747,347
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                       195,548
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              4,444
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                199,992
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       50,713  <F3>
<NET-INCOME>                                   90,004  <F4>
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     4,122
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  85,882
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       95,000  <F5>
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      93,677
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        236,067
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<FN>

<F1> INCLUDES ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME OF $7.
<F2> INCLUDES AMOUNT FOR COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
<F2> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $125,000.
<F3> INCLUDES AMOUNT FOR COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
<F3> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $5,350.
<F4> AMOUNT IS NET OF INCOME TAX EXPENSE OF $59,275.
<F5> REPRESENTS COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS PAID TO PARENT CORPORATION.
</FN>


</TABLE>
H. Res. 249

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

September 13, 1993.

Resolved, That the Honorable G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery,

a Representative from the State of Mississippi, be, and he is

hereby, elected Speaker pro tempore during any absence of

the Speaker, such authority to continue not later than September 15, 1993.

Resolved, That the President and the Senate be notified

by the Clerk of the election of the Honorable G.V. (Sonny)

Montgomery as Speaker pro tempore during the absence of

the Speaker.

Attest:

Clerk.
# Official Journal C 23/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 23 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5823 January 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 23

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5823 January 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2015/C 023/01 | Commission communication pursuant to Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws, concerning the competent authorities and single liaison offices (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2015/C 023/01

Commission communication pursuant to Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws, concerning the competent authorities and single liaison offices (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### In re ADOPTION of Laurie Lee MERCER and Gregory Loren Mercer. Gary S. MERCER, Appellant, v. Edward Barry McAULEY, Appellee.

No. 72-343.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 7, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-3147 

DEAN J. BALOURIS, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 

 Respondent. 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board 

in PH0752060495-I-1. 

ON MOTION 

Before PROST, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and MOORE, Circuit 

Judge. 

PROST, Circuit Judge. 

O R D E R

 Dean J. Balouris moves (1) for a stay, pending review in this court, of the Merit 

Systems Protection Board’s January 4, 2008 order that modified the Administrative 

Judge’s initial decision and (2) for an order to reinstate Balouris or pay him his salary 

pending disposition of this petition for review. 

 The Administrative Judge mitigated the agency's removal of Balouris to a 60-day 

suspension. On review, the Board modified the decision to sustain the removal. 

Balouris states that the agency employed Balouris for a period after the Administrative 
Judge’s initial decision but that the agency removed him after the Board's January 4 

order. 

In his motion, Balouris states that he is suffering extreme and undue hardship 

because of his removal. Specifically, Balouris states that his removal from his job is a 

great financial burden. However, in Sampson v. Murray, 415 U.S. 61, 89-92 (1974), the 

Supreme Court held that loss of federal employment and earnings is not an irreparable 

harm warranting interim relief because adequate compensatory or other corrective relief 

could be available at a later date. 

Absent a showing of irreparable harm, Balouris must show a strong likelihood of 

success on the merits to be entitled to a stay, or interim relief, pending review. See

Standard Havens Products v. Gencor Indus., 897 F.2d 511, 512 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (this 

court considers whether a movant has made a strong showing that he is likely to 

succeed on the merits, whether the movant will be irreparably injured absent a stay, 

whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other side, and where the public 

interest lies). See also Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 779 (1987) (to obtain a stay, a 

movant must establish a strong likelihood on the merits or, failing that, nonetheless 

demonstrate a substantial case on the merits provided that the harm factors militate in 

his favor). In his motion, Balouris does not establish a strong likelihood of success on 

the merits. 

 Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

2008-3147 - 2 - 
2008-3147 - 3 - 

 Balouris’s motion is denied. 

 FOR THE COURT 

 March 6, 2008 /s/ Sharon Prost 

 Date Sharon Prost 

 Circuit Judge 

cc: Christo J. Balouris, Esq. 

 Jeanne E. Davidson, Esq. 

s20
#### DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Petitioner, v. Charles MADDOX et al., Respondents.

No. 40737.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 12, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, G J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### TRE-O-RIPE GROVES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Dorothy M. MILLS, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. Q-438.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 24, 1972.

Lawrence J. Phalin, of Mateer & Har-bert, Orlando, for appellant.

John E. Hankal, of Coble, Stewart & McKinnon, Daytona Beach, for appellees.

JOHNSON, Judge.

Appellant appeals from an order dismissing its second amended petition which sought to have certain ad valorem tangible personal property taxes declared illegal, collection enjoined and taxes paid under protest refunded.

Appellant is the lessee in a contract with the National Aeronautics & Space Administration. The contract covers certain citrus groves in Volusia County to which the National Aeronautics & Space Administration holds fee title and which appellant rents for $49,000.00 per year which entitles it to use the land for cultivation and harvesting of citrus fruit. Appellant contends that assessment and collection of the tangible personal property tax is illegal because it is a direct imposition of tax on property of the United States of America which is immune from such tax.

We are of the opinion that the trial court correctly dismissed the second amended petition for the reason that the same failed to state a cause of action. It is well established beyond the need for citation of cases that when Federal property is placed in the hands of private enterprise for gain by that enterprise, the immunity from taxation of the property is lost. We do not feel that appellant has sufficiently alleged facts in its petitions which would give rise to an exception to this rule. The utilization of the property as a predominately public or private purpose, not the character or nature of its owner, is the major criteria in determining liability for taxes. There can be no doubt in the present case that the purposes to which the citrus groves are utilized are essentially private to the appellant, rather than public.

We have considered the remaining points raised by appellant and find them to be substantially without merit.

*121Accordingly, the order dismissing the second amended complaint is affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON, J., concur.
#### In the Interest of A. J., a child, Appellant.

No. 40637.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 7, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 16, 2014 

# Order

Dec ember 16 , 2014

149073 ( 75)(76 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

RAHIM OMARKHAN LOCKRIDGE

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 149073

COA: 310649

Oakland CC: 2011

- 238930

- FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Wayne County Prosecutor’s

Office to extend the time for filing a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief

submitted on December 12, 2014, is accepted for filing

. On further order of the Chief

Justice, the motion of the Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office to participate in oral

argument by sharing ten minutes of the Oakland County Prosecutor’s allotted time for

a rgument is GRANTED.
#### George J. MANDERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-890.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 20, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
MEMORANDUM 

TO: File 

FROM: George Faison 

SUBECT: Presentation to Scrap Tire Workshop 

A presentation was made on February 23, 2010 to the Region 8 State Scrap Tire 

Workshop to provide an overview of the upcoming proposed rule Identification of NonHazardous Secondary Materials that are Solid Wastes. The presentation focused on the 

following topics: 

• Background and Purpose of the Rule 

• Overview of the January 2, 2009 Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

• Possible approaches to address scrap tires and tire derived fuel 

• Next Steps
EX-10.30






 Apria, Inc. has requested confidential treatment of this registration statement and
associated correspondence 
 pursuant to Rule 83 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

 Exhibit 10.30 

AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 TO THE

 APRIA HEALTHCARE GROUP INC. 

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 

The Apria Healthcare Group Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (“the Plan”) is, by way of 

clarification of the administration of the Plan, hereby amended in the following respects, 

effective as of January 1, 2020: 

1.    Section 12.1 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

12.1 Committee Duties. The plan administrator of the Plan for purposes of ERISA (the “Plan Administrator”) is
the Company. The administrative powers and duties of the Company as Plan Administrator are delegated to, and shall to the extent not otherwise exercised by the Company be carried out by, the Committee acting for the Plan Administrator. Such
delegated powers and duties shall include, without limitation, those Committee powers and duties described in this Article 12 and/or elsewhere in the Plan, as it may be amended. The Committee shall consist, from time to time, of the Board, or such
committee(s) as the Board or its delegates shall appoint. Members of the Committee may be Participants under this Plan. The Committee shall act at meetings by affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the Committee. Any action permitted to be
taken at a meeting may be taken without a meeting if, prior to such action, a unanimous written consent to the action is signed by all members of the Committee and such written consent is filed with the minutes of the proceedings of the Committee. A
member of the Committee shall not vote or act upon any matter which relates solely to himself or herself as a Participant. The Chairman or any other member or members of the Committee designated by the Chairman may execute any certificate or other
written direction on behalf of the Committee. When making a determination or calculation, the Committee shall be entitled to rely on information furnished by a Participant or the Company. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the foregoing Amendment, to be effective as provided above, has been executed on behalf of Apria Healthcare Group Inc. by
the officer signing below. 
  

	
	APRIA HEALTHCARE GROUP INC.
	
	
	 /s/ Celina M. Scally

	Celina M. Scally
	 SVP, Chief Human Resources Officer
 Date:
March 10, 2020
Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements Form S-8 (No. 333-08847) pertaining to the Lark Sequencing
Technologies, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan and  Form S-8 (No. 333-35675)
pertaining to the Lark Technologies, Inc. 1997 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan
for Non-Employee Directors of our report dated  February 25, 2000 with respect
to the financial statements of Lark Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Houston, Texas
March 29, 2000
#### CENTURY HOME BUILDERS, INC., Appellant, v. Robert E. SANDERS et al., Appellees.

No. 1061.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Dec. 20, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Security Inquiry Transmittal 

                - Title:  Security Inquiry Transmittal  
                - Form #:         GSA5004      
                - Current Revision Date:  10/2014
                - Authority or Regulation: 

PDF versions of forms use Adobe      ReaderTM.      Download Adobe ReaderTM

Search for another form

Print PageEmail Page

Top