alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14315]



[[Page 31157]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Neural Control of Mobility in Aging.
    Date: July 25, 2018.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 
2C223, 7201 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Isis S. Mikhail, MD, MPH, DRPH, National 
Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 
2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7704, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83cecac8cbc2cacfcac3cec2cacfadcdcacbadc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d606466656c6461646d606c646103636465036a627b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 28, 2018.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-14315 Filed 7-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2023-1012

LT Case No. 2016-CA-1693

_____________________________

MARLEN JARAMILLO, as Personal 

Representative of the Estate of 

Osben Jaramillo,

Appellant,

v.

SAL TARABOULOUS and SUSAN 

TARABOULOUS,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County.

Dawn P. Fields, Senior Judge.

Brian J. Lee, of Morgan & Morgan, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Scot E. Samis, of Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP, 

St. Petersburg, for Appellees.

July 30, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SOUD, BOATWRIGHT, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
<PAGE>





EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-89928) pertaining to the ANADIGICS, Inc. Stock Option Plan,
1994 Long-Term Incentive and Share Award Plan, 1995 Long-Term Incentive Share
Award Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-32533) pertaining to the ANADIGICS, Inc. 1997 Long-Term
Incentive and Share Award Plan for Employees, of our report dated January 27,
2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
ANADIGICS, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1999.



                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

MetroPark, New Jersey
March 22, 2000
#### SUCCESSION of Roy Watson SHARBINO v. ADMINISTRATION.

No. 4352.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 28, 1974.

Writ Refused May 17, 1974.

Pharis & Pharis, by James A. Pharis, Jr., Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant.

Irving Ward-Steinman, Alexandria, for defendants-intervenors-appellees.

Before CULPEPPER, MILLER and PONDER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment was rendered in this case on November 5, 1973. An application for rehearing was timely filed by the Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants, and we denied the application on December 3, 1973. On December 21, 1973, the Appellants filed a Notice of Intent to Seek Writs To The Supreme Court. The Appellants attached to this Notice a request that this Court certify certain questions regarding the case to the Supreme Court under the authority granted this Court by Article VII, Section 25 of the Constitution of 1921 and LSA-R.S. 13:4449.

We do not consider Appellant’s request to certify questions to the Supreme Court for the reason that this Court is without jurisdiction to consider the matter after the rehearing has been denied.

Application denied.
# C_2020320EN.01002901.xml

| 28.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/29

---

Action brought on 11 August 2020 — Guo v EUIPO — Sand Cph (sandriver)

(Case T-505/20)

(2020/C 320/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Xiuling Guo (Shanyang Town, China) (represented by: L. Le Stanc, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sand Cph A/S (Copenhagen, Denmark)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark sandriver — European Union trade mark No 15 856 297

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2020 in Case R 2019/2019-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare admissible the action brought against the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare admissible the action brought against the contested decision;

| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the General Court and the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the General Court and the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 60(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by finding that there was a likelihood of confusion for the public between the earlier European Union word mark No 3 105 491 and the applicant’s later semi-figurative European Union trade mark No 15 856 297. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 60(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by finding that there was a likelihood of confusion for the public between the earlier European Union word mark No 3 105 491 and the applicant’s later semi-figurative European Union trade mark No 15 856 297.

---
[No. 679-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

January 10, 1972.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. John Anthony Savoie, *Defendant,*Wayne Delbert Forgue, *Appellant.*
EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Board of Directors

Datastream Systems, Inc.:



We consent to incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements on Forms
S-8 of Datastream Systems, Inc., of our reports dated September 12, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Datastream Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, the related financial statement schedule, managements assessment of internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Datastream Systems, Inc.:



|     |  |                     |  |            
|---- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------
|Form |  | Registration Number |  | Filing Date
|S-8  |  | 33-                 |  | 5/13/1996  
|S-8  |  | 333-                |  | 10/10/1997 
|S-8  |  | 333-00080           |  | 4/17/1998  
|S-8  |  | 333-00314           |  | 4/17/1998  
|S-8  |  | 333-03579           |  | 4/17/1998  
|S-8  |  | 333-37655           |  | 4/17/1998  
|S-8  |  | 333-57055           |  | 6/17/1998  
|S-8  |  | 333-79085           |  | 5/21/1999  
|S-8  |  | 333-81663           |  | 6/28/1999  
|S-8  |  | 333-43980           |  | 8/17/2000  
|S-8  |  | 333-43982           |  | 8/17/2000  
|S-8  |  | 333-59320           |  | 4/20/2001  
|S-8  |  | 333-99145           |  | 9/04/2002  
|S-8  |  | 333-107431          |  | 7/29/2003  



Our report dated September 12, 2005,
on managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, expresses our opinion that Datastream Systems, Inc. did not
maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, because of the effect of the material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that explains
those material weaknesses.



/s/ KPMG LLP



Greenville, South Carolina

September 12, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 113 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 113

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to allow Members to 
  utilize the services of volunteers in their offices, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 1993

  Mr. Manzullo (for himself and Mr. McInnis) submitted the following 
        resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to allow Members to 
  utilize the services of volunteers in their offices, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Resolved, That (a) rule XLV of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended--
            (1) in clause 1 by striking ``No'' and inserting ``Except 
        as provided by clause 5, no''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new clause:
    ``5.(a) A Member may accept the services of any number of 
volunteers to perform official duties of a ministerial nature assigned 
by that Member.
    ``(b) The Committee on House Administration shall prescribe 
regulations to carry out this clause.''.
    (b) The regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration to carry out clause 5 of rule XLV of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives shall prohibit the utilization by any Member's 
office of the services of any volunteer who is receiving compensation 
from any other source for the time during which that individual is 
volunteering his services to that Member.

                                 <all>
```
#### STATE *vs.*SAMUEL THAWLEY.

.Dying declarations; when admissible.

The state of the deceased's health at the time of the injury, is evidence.

His character as a violent man, is not evidence.

Kent,

April term, 1845.

Indictment, murder of Waitman Vickery.

The deceased lived about nine days after receiving a blow on the head from the defendant. On the day he was struck, and every day afterwards, until he became insensible, he said he should die. His declarations as to the cause and extent of the injury were offered and objected to, as not being made under the perfect conviction of a dying state; and as not being competent to prove that the blow was the cause of death.

*The Court,*

*(Milligan*

dissenting,) admitted these declarations as dying declarations; though they said that as to the wound being the cause of the death; and also as to the condition of the deceased at the time of the declarations, they would be open to remark before the jury, in connection with general evidence of his intemperate habits, and low state of health. *(Ros. Ev.*32; *Mosely’s Case,*1 *Moo. Cr. Ca.*97, *a.)*

The defence set up was, that the blow was struck in self-defence ; and a witness was asked whether the deceased was not a violent man, and in the habit of attacking others with dangerous weapons!

It was objected that the character of the deceased was not in issue, and, after argument—■

*The Court,*

*(Harrington*

dubitante) rejected the evidence.

Booth, *Chief*Justice.

—The testimony offered is the general character of the deceased as a violent man. From the fact, that we cannot find any case in the books, where this evidence has been admitted, nor any principle which would admit it, we feel constrained to reject the evidence. We do not see how the character of the deceased as a quarrelsome or fighting man is in issue. The question is, guilty, or not guilty of murder. The homicide being made out, it lies on the defendant to reduce the offence below the grade of murder, and he must do this by evidence of facts, and not by the mere general bad character of the deceased. If such evidence is admissible it would follow that the character of the prisoner as a peaceable or violent man must be admissible, for it is certainly as important to know his character as that of the deceased. Yet, it is *563perfectly well settled that the defendant’s character cannot be- in. quired into, unless he puts it in issue.

Judge Harrington’s doubt arose from the fact, that in four cases-within his knowledge, this evidence had been admitted without objection, viz., State *vs.*Cochlan, Elason, Saul Thompson, and Prince Tilghman. He thought it might possibly come within the reason of the principle, that “ in particular cases where the character of the-prosecutor is mingled with the transaction in question, it forms a point material to the issue, and may consequently be inquired into.”" *(Ros. Ed.*88.)

The defendant was- acquitted.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11



             FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES AND EARNINGS USED IN PER SHARE COMPUTATION
                        (DOLLARS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       THREE MONTHS ENDED      NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                          SEPTEMBER 30,          SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                       ------------------      -----------------
                                                        1998        1997        1998       1997
                                                       ------       -----      -------    ------ 
<S>                                                    <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>
The weighted average number of shares of
   Common Stock were as follows.....................   90,000      90,000       90,000    90,000
                                                       ======      ======      =======    ======   


Income used in the computation of earnings per share were as follows:



<CAPTION>

                                                       THREE MONTHS ENDED      NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                          SEPTEMBER 30,          SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                       ------------------      ------------------
                                                         1998        1997        1998        1997
                                                       -------     ------      -------    -------   
<S>                                                    <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>       

Net Earnings - Continuing Operations ................  $14,165     $9,807      $36,715    $27,587   
Dividends paid on preferred stocks ..................     (130)      (130)        (390)      (390)  
                                                       -------     ------      -------    -------   
Income used in per share computation                                                                
    of earnings .....................................  $14,035     $9,677      $36,325    $27,197   
                                                       =======     ======      =======    =======   
                                                                                                    
Basic and fully dilutive earnings per                                                               
   share - Continuing Operations ....................  $  0.16     $ 0.11      $  0.41    $  0.30   
                                                       =======     ======      =======    =======   
                                                       
</TABLE>
#### KAR PRODUCTS, INC., and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Petitioners, v. Carol M. ARMSTRONG, widow of Lanier Douglas Armstrong, Deceased, and Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 43278.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 15, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

.ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
USDA United Forest	 Northern Region States Region One 

Department of Service 200 East Broadway 

Agriculture	 Missoula, MT 59802 

File Code: 2580 

Date: NOV 9 2007 

Laurel Dygowski 

Regional Haze Coordinator 

Air Quality Planning and Management Unit 

US EPA - Region 8 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

Denver, CO 80202-1129 

Dear Ms. Dygowski: 

The USDA Forest Service Northern Region is pleased to provide the following comments in 

regards to the BART Analysis submitted by Ash Grove Cement. 

•	 We concur with the analysis provided by EC/R that a greater level of control ofNOx 

emissions can be achieved using SNCR and a low NOx burner than what is quoted by 

Ash Grove. Ash Grove should redo its calculations based on the highest potential1eve1 

of control. 

•	 The Forest Service would like to see more information pertaining to the actual level of 

PM10 control provided by the existing control devices. The Forest Service is concerned 

about the high levels of PM10 emissions even with the existing controls in place. 

•	 When assessing deciview improvements or costs per deciview for improvements, Ash 

Grove should consider all Class I areas, not just Gates of the Mountains. 

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this analysis. 

Sincerely, 

~AJ01Lu- 4t/ntM;.it.. 

(THOMAS L. TIDWELL
 

Regional Forester
 

Caring for the Land and Serving People	 Printed on Recycled Paper \i...
#### Herman JACKSON, Jr., Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-996.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 17, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 354

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that committee reports accompanying authorization and revenue bills include employment impact statements prepared by the Director of the Congressional

Budget Office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 9, 1994

Mr. GALLO (for himself, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. CANADY, Mr.

ARMEY, Mr. MACHTLEY, Mr. QUINN, and Mr. HASTERT) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

require that committee reports accompanying authorization and revenue bills include employment impact statements prepared by the Director of the Congressional

Budget Office.

1 Resolved, That clause 2(l) of rule XI of the Rules of

2 the House of Representatives is amended by adding at the

3 end the following new subparagraph:

4 ‘‘(8) Each report of a committee on each authoriza5 tion or revenue bill or joint resolution of a public character

6 shall contain a detailed analytical statement prepared by

7 the Director of the Congressional Budget Office of the es-
2

•HRES 354 IH

1 timated impact, if any, of that bill or joint resolution on

2 public sector and private sector employment over the 5-

3 fiscal year period beginning with the fiscal year in which

4 it is to become effective.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>  9
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  information  extracted from the consolidated  financial
statements  of NS&L  Bancorp  for the  year  ended  September  30,  2000  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      2,982
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         80
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   173
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     23,202
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       22,824
<LOANS>                                    44,540
<ALLOWANCE>                                    63
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             72,809
<DEPOSITS>                                 48,256
<SHORT-TERM>                               11,309
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           904
<LONG-TERM>                                 1,808
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                       10
<OTHER-SE>                                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             10,124
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             1,500
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           3,286
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              109
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            4,895
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          2,143
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          2,764
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       2,131
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  13
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             1,815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               737
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    482
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  482
<EPS-BASIC>                                   .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .74
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                               2.35
<LOANS-NON>                                     3
<LOANS-PAST>                                   49
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               63
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  33
<RECOVERIES>                                   20
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              63
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           63
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         0


</TABLE>
#### Jackie Lee HARRISON, Petitioner, v. Honorable Gunter STEPHENSON, Judge, Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Polk County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-395.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 7, 1973.

“Prohibition dismissed.”