alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 16, 2024 No. 24-09

GPO MEDIA CONTACT: GARY SOMERSET 202.512.1957 | mb 202.355.3997 | gsomerset@gpo.gov 

GPO MAKES AVAILABLE NEW STATUTES AT LARGE

DATING BACK TO 1789

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Government Publishing Office (GPO) has added

historical volumes of the United States Statutes at Large (Statutes at Large) to 

GovInfo, the one-stop site for authentic, published information for all three 

branches of the Federal Government. The newly added Volumes 1–64 (1789–1950)

date back to 1789 and include the text of the Declaration of Independence, Articles of 

Confederation, the Constitution, amendments to the Constitution, treaties with 

Indians and foreign nations, presidential proclamations, and treaties and 

international agreements approved by the Senate. GPO added these Volumes to the 

previously existing collection covering the years 1951–2018. The entire Statutes at 

Large collection now covers 1789–2018 (1st–115th Congresses). 

Statutes at Large: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/STATUTE

“Congratulations to our GPO teammates on providing the public easy access to 

these historic documents. The American people are the real beneficiaries of 

having another collection on GovInfo that dates to our country’s humble 

beginnings,” said GPO Director Hugh Nathanial Halpern. “This digitization project 

is just another example of how GPO is delivering on its vision of an America 

Informed.”

The Statutes at Large is the permanent collection of all laws and resolutions 

enacted during each session of Congress. The Statutes at Large is prepared and 

published by the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) of the National Archives and 

Records Administration (NARA). The Volumes were added through collaborative 

digital imaging efforts between the Library of Congress and GPO.

Users may browse each volume on GovInfo by Bills Enacted into Laws, Private 

Laws, Presidential Proclamations, Public Laws, Treaties, and other levels of 
granularity. In addition to these digitally imaged files, GPO will also make available 

a version of each document in the United States Legislative Markup (USLM) XML 

schema in the future. 

GPO is the Federal Government’s resource for publishing trusted information for 

the Federal Government to the American people. The GPO is responsible for the 

production and distribution of information products and services for all three 

branches of the Federal Government, including U.S. passports for the Department 

of State as well as the official publications of Congress, the White House, and other 

Federal agencies in digital and print formats. GPO provides for permanent public 

access to Federal Government information at no charge through www.GovInfo.gov

and partnerships with approximately 1,100 libraries nationwide participating in 

the Federal Depository Library Program. For more information, please visit 

www.gpo.gov.

 ###
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

J.M., the father

, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 4D20

- 2607

[ March 17, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Steven J. Levin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432020DP000038.

Crystal J. Marsh of Marsh Law Firm, P.A., Stuart

, for appellant.

Andrew Feigenbaum of Children’s Legal Service s , West Palm Beach, for appellee Department of Children and Families

.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel

, and Gloria Floyd, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fourth District, West Palm Beach, for appellee the M other

.

ON CON C ESSION OF ERROR

P ER C URIAM

.

Appellant J.M. is a non

- offending f ather appeal ing the trial court’s order finding his child , Z.M., dependent as to the child’s m other but withholding adjudication of dependency. He argues the trial court erred in withholding adjudication under section 39.507(5), Florida Statutes (2020) , because the

m other had uncompleted case plan tasks other than supervision. Some of th os e tasks included: finding stable housing and income, completing a drug treatment program, and completing parenting classes. Appellee Department of Children and Families properly concedes error

, and we reverse.

“Dependency adjudications are reviewed under the abuse of discretion

standard.” A.T.N. v. Fla. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs. , 70 So. 3d 634, 636 (Fla. 1st DCA 20 11) ; see also D . Children v. Dep ’ t of Children & Family Servs

. , 820 So. 2d 980, 982 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (same). “ However, because it appears

the circuit court ’ s order, and the [parties’] arguments on appeal, both rest uponthe interpretation of Chapter 39 ’ s requirements, our review is de novo. ” N.A. v. Dep ’ t of Children & Families , 267 So. 3d 430, 433

– 34 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)

.

Section 39.507(5), Florida Statutes (2020) , states the court may withhold adjudication if it “ finds that the child named in the petition is dependent, but

finds that no action other than supervision in the child ’ s home is required .” (emphasis added). Here, the court should not have withh e ld adjudication as to

the m other because there were “action[s] other than supervision ” that had to be completed. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to enter an order adjudicating the child dependen t and for further proceedings.

Revers ed and remanded.

D AMOORGIAN

, F ORST

, and K LINGENSMITH JJ., concur.

* * *

FINAL UPON RELEASE; NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED; MANDATE ISSUED SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH OPINION.
#### GEORGE BENNETT, d. b. app’t. *vs.*LEWES CHAMBERLAIN, p. b. respondent

A husband is not liable for jewelry and ornaments sold his wife, without his authority; but such authority may be implied from circumstances.

This was an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, in an action of assumpsit, for the price of a gold watch, rings and other jewelry, sold defendant’s *wife.*The defence was, that they were bought without the husband’s authority.

*Lofland,*for plaintiff.

Cullen, for defendant.

*The Court*

charged—1. That the case depended upon the question whether the wife had her husband’s express or implied authority to purchase the articles sold to her and charged to him.

Authority of the husband may be implied for the purchase of necessary provisions of the family, without further proof than that they are bought for the family; but with regard to articles of dress or ornament for the wife, the authority of the husband cannot be implied, except for such articles as are suitable to her condition, and his ability to pay. In such cases, and even in cases of doubtful propriety, if the articles are brought into the family with the husband’s knowledge, and not returned, he will be chargeable. The inquiry was then, whether the watch and jewelry were suitable to the condition of the husband; did she wear and use them with his knowledge—if she did, and the articles were not out of proportion to his means, the jury might infer the wife’s authority to take up such goods on his credit.

Verdict for plaintiff.
| 1.    | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form10-K of ImageWare Systems, Inc.; and |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.    | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  |  |
|--|--|

|  |  |
|--|--|

| Date: May 19, 2020 | ImageWare Systems, Inc. By:/s/ KristinTaylor                  |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               | Kristin Taylor                                                     |
|               | Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer) |
# Amtsblatt C 12A/17.

| | ISSN 1725-2407 |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 12A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 52. Jahrgang17. Januar 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2407

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 12A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

52. Jahrgang17. Januar 2009

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Bekanntmachungen |
| | VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN |
| | Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO) |
| 2009/C 012A/01 | Reserveliste — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AD/96/07 — Referatsleiter(in) (AD 9) deutscher oder französischer Sprache für das Informationsbüro des Europäischen Parlaments in Luxemburg | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

V   Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO)

2009/C 012A/01

Reserveliste — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AD/96/07 — Referatsleiter(in) (AD 9) deutscher oder französischer Sprache für das Informationsbüro des Europäischen Parlaments in Luxemburg

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE
Government National Mortgage Association

Adjustable Rate Multiple Issuer Pool Numbers

CUSIP MIP # POOL 

TYPE

SECURITY 

INTEREST 

RATE

TERM 

YEARS

INITIAL PAY 

DATE

SECURITY 

MARGIN

TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL # OF 

LOAN 

PACKAGES

TOTAL # OF 

MORTGAGES 

(Loans)

 NOTE:

 1 36179YVH4 MA9616 36179YVF8 MA9614 AF 3.500 30 05/20/2024 1.500 $259,065.00 Created April 16, 2024 *The indicated columns represent an aggregated value to date, please see the Finalized MIP Listing for the actual total The Finalized List with the actual totals for each issued MIP will be published on the third business day prior to the end of that Issue Month. This is the aggregated list of the Adjustable Rate Multiple Issuer Pool Numbers for Issue Month of April 2024. 36179Y3K8 MA9802 AT 5.000 30 05/20/2024 1.500 $532,183.00 1 1 1 APRIL 2024 3.500 30 05/20/2024 1.500 $483,088.00 1 1 AT 1 MA9801 $424,634.00 36179Y3J1 4.500 30 05/20/2024 1.500 6 AT 3 MA9624 $3,102,980.00 36179YVR2 6.000 30 05/20/2024 1.500 62

*

AF 7 MA9619 $26,279,739.00 36179YVL5 5.000 30 05/20/2024 1.500 5 AF 4 36179YVJ0 MA9617 36179YVG6 MA9615 AF 4.000 30 05/20/2024 1.500 $2,084,134.00 1

SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT JANET KERR AT 1-800-234-4662, OPTION #3 OR 212-815-3221. 05/20/2024 1.500 $289,987.00 1 1

*

36179Y3V4 MA9812 AF 3.000 30

*

3.000 30 05/20/2024 1.500 $384,615.00 1 1 1 AT 1 MA9800 $206,043.00 36179Y3H5 6.500 30 05/20/2024 1.500 29 AF 4 MA9620 $12,025,074.00 36179YVM3 5.500 30 05/20/2024 1.500 51 AF 4 36179YVK7 MA9618 4.500 30 05/20/2024 1.500 $23,409,534.00 1 AF
256 La. 863

#### Amos L. BLACK v. ETHYL CORPORATION and the Travelers Insurance Company.

No. 50780.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 30, 1970.

In re: Amos L. Black applying for certi-orari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 236 So.2d 607.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in the judgment.
# INSTRUCTIONS

# 531 Appraised-Amended

# 531 BVO

# 531 Special Handling

# 531 Group Move

# 531 Move Mgt

# 531 Property Mgt

# 531 Other Addl Svc
# C_2021038EN.01000101.xml

| 3.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

2 February 2021

(2021/C 38/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2044 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4373 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88075 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1593 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0808 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 156,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,3463 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,900 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 355,70 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4953 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8743 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 8,6629 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5847 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5422 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3361 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6793 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6041 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 344,07 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,0067 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7756 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5810 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 878,40 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8712 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,708 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 90,9307 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,120 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,4904 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,3492 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 87,9060 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2044

JPY

Japanese yen

126,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4373

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88075

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1593

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0808

ISK

Iceland króna

156,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,3463

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,900

HUF

Hungarian forint

355,70

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4953

RON

Romanian leu

4,8743

TRY

Turkish lira

8,6629

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5847

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5422

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3361

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6793

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6041

KRW

South Korean won

1 344,07

ZAR

South African rand

18,0067

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7756

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5810

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 878,40

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8712

PHP

Philippine peso

57,708

RUB

Russian rouble

90,9307

THB

Thai baht

36,120

BRL

Brazilian real

6,4904

MXN

Mexican peso

24,3492

INR

Indian rupee

87,9060

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
263 La. 94

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Georgette HUNDLEY, Diana Hundley et al.

No. 52893.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 17, 1972.

In re: Georgette Hundley and Diana Hundley applying for writ of certiorari and stay order.

Writ granted. See order.

The petition of relators in the above numbered and entitled cause having been duly considered,

The Juvenile Court in and for the Parish of Jefferson Davis is ordered to hold a bail hearing within twenty-four (24) hours and fix bail in accordance with Code of Criminal Procedure Article 317. See State v. Franklin, 202 La. 439, 12 So.2d 211, and In Re: Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1966).
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Leonard T. Sarfati, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[721 NYS2d 297]

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 10, 2000, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a letter carrier for the United States Postal Service after he failed to report his involvement in a motor vehicle accident which occurred during the course of his employment. Although the other motorist wanted the incident to be reported, claimant determined that any damage did not warrant a report and left the scene. It was not until the employer summoned claimant upon his return to the office to discuss the incident that claimant filled out a report. Claimant also was later issued a ticket for leaving the scene of an accident. Inasmuch as claimant’s conduct in failing to follow the employer’s known accident reporting procedures was detrimental to the employer’s interest, substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant’s action amounted to disqualifying misconduct *(see, Matter of Garnica [Dolce Intl.*— Commissioner *of Labor],*261 AD2d 765; *Matter of Johnson [Wayandanch Day Care Ctr.*— Commissioner *of Labor],*257 AD2d 823).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 33-94096) of our report, dated February 6, 1998 on the
consolidated balance sheets of BankIllinois Financial Corporation as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the related statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period
ending December 31, 1997, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1997.

McGLADREY & PULLEN



Champaign, Illinois
March 30, 1998
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-3 (Nos. 333-119198, 333-131876, 333-121004, 333-122433, 333-109511 and
      333-122693) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-113889)
      of
      our report relating to the consolidated financial statements of Apollo Gold
      Corporation dated March 30, 2006, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
      of Apollo Gold Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005.






/s/ ***Deloitte
                & Touche LLP***Independent
                Registered Chartered AccountantsVancouver,
                British
                Columbia, CanadaMarch 31, 2006
#### FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. Harvey EBERHART, Appellee.

No. 77-1451.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 14, 1978.

Preddy, Kutner & Hardy and Howard K. Chema, Miami, for appellant.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, George P. Tel-epas, Miami, for appellee.

Before NATHAN, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the correctness of an order granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and ordering the parties to proceed to arbitration on plaintiff’s uninsured motorist claim. The first point raised is that there were issues of fact regarding whether the plaintiff gave proper notice of the accident. The record reflects that the defense of notice was not raised by the pleadings and was not placed at issue before the trial court. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.110(d) and 1.120(c). The second point is that there were issues of fact as to whether or not the adverse vehicle was a hit and run vehicle as defined by the policy. The question of whether or not a hit and run vehicle was involved is a matter properly subject to determination in arbitration. *Ebens v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company,*278 So.2d 674 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); *Industrial Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. Coquemard,*332 So.2d 636 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Therefore, the order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and ordering the parties to proceed to arbitration is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.3

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel L. Clemmens, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Highwoods Properties, Inc., general partner of the Operating Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ DANIELL.CLEMMENS                                                                 |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Daniel L. ClemmensVice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the General Partner |   |
| March 12, 2008                                                             |   |
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                   EXHIBIT 11

                        Golden West Financial Corporation
        Statement of Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
                 (Dollars in thousands except per share figures)


                                                               Three Months Ended
                                                                    March 31
                                                          -----------------------------
                                                              1998            1997
                                                          -------------   -------------

<S>                                                       <C>             <C>         
Earnings Before Extraordinary Item                        $    110,081    $     83,374
Extraordinary Item, Net of Tax                                  (7,710)            -0-
                                                          -------------   -------------
Net Earnings                                              $    102,371    $     83,374
                                                          =============   =============

Weighted Average Shares                                     57,126,696      57,314,639
    Add:  Options outstanding at quarterend                  2,374,600       2,602,290
    Less:  Shares assumed purchased back with
           proceeds of options                               1,492,456       1,662,346
                                                          -------------   -------------
Diluted Average Shares Outstanding                          58,008,840      58,254,583
                                                          =============   =============

Basic Earnings Per Share Calculation:
  Basic Earnings Per Share Before Extraordinary Item       $      1.92    $      1.45
  Extraordinary Item, Net of Tax                                  (.13)          0.00
                                                          -------------   -------------
  Basic Earnings Per Share                                 $      1.79    $      1.45
                                                          =============   =============

Diluted Earnings Per Share Calculation:
  Diluted Earnings Per Share Before Extraordinary Item     $      1.89    $      1.43
  Extraordinary Item, Net of Tax                                  (.13)          0.00
                                                          -------------   -------------
  Diluted Earnings Per Share                               $      1.76    $      1.43
                                                          =============   =============
</TABLE>