alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harold L. COOLING v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY.

No. 53108.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1973.

In re: United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 269 So. 2d 294.

Writ refused. No error of law.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be granted.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. James A. SOWELL.

No. 54260.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 4, 1974.

In re: James A. Sowell applying for Writs of Certiorari and Mandamus.

Writ denied. There is no error of law in the judgment complained of.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,881
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  456,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                    75,176
<INVENTORY>                                    181,261
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               897,705
<PP&E>                                         722,434
<DEPRECIATION>                                 283,542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,634,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,302,416
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     16,318
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,590,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,634,907
<SALES>                                        125,080
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               794,694
<CGS>                                           86,630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  544,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               123,643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                17,301
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,896
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,227
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,669
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,669
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 30927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14128]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-1813-000]

Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing 
Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization: Power Up 
Energy, LLC

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Power Up Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is July 16, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
[email protected]. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: June 25, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14128 Filed 6-29-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Sf 

### ATE OF MISSISSIPPI HALEY BARBOUR

GOVERNOR MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUIY TRUDY D. FISHER, ExEClITJVE DIRECTOR
June 

### 27,2011
Mrs. Gwendolyn Keyes-Fleming Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IV 

### 61 Forsyth Street Atlanta, Georgia 

### 30303-3104
Re: Southeastern Wood Preserving Canton, Madison County, MS Dear Mrs. Keyes-Fleming: TheU. S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) letter ofJune 

### 13,2011, requested written support for EPA to proceed with the National Priorities List (NPL) listingprocess for the Southeastern Wood Preserving site. I have reviewed the matter and concur with EPA's decision to proceed with the listing process with theunderstanding that no commitment offinancial resources is beingmade onthepart ofthe State ofMississippi regarding costs associated with a cleanup at the Southeastern Wood Preserving site at this time. The State looks forward to working with EPA inthis matterto ensure protection ofhuman health and the environment. Should you need anything further from the State onthis matter, please feel free to contact me at 

### 601-961-5221. Verytruly yours,

# ~,b~ Jerry 

### B. Banks, P.E., BCE Chief, Groundwater Assessment 

### & Remediation Division
cc: TrudyD. Fisher

OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL POST OFFICE Box 2261· JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39225-2261· TEL: (601) 961-5171· FAX: (601) 354-6612. www.dcq.state.ms.us AN EQUAL OPPORTUNllY EMPLOYER
#### Ernest McCLOUD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-218.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 26, 1973.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Vaughn J. Rudnick, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000039743
<NAME>                        LBU, Inc.                  
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             67,450    
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     170,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                       25,000
<INVENTORY>                                     1,615,319
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                2,239,451
<PP&E>                                            424,414
<DEPRECIATION>                                    120,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  2,640,538
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,192,619
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        1,124,923
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    2,640,538
<SALES>                                         1,313,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,365,299
<CGS>                                             886,938
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     886,938
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  484,948
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                33,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (92,121)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (21,188)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      70,933
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.50)
        


</TABLE>
ATTACHMENT A:

NO 2 Pollution Control Measures in the District of Columbia

Control Measures District Regulation and

Latest Effective Date Latest EPA

Approval into SIP

POINT SOURCE MEASURES

Nitrogen Oxide Emissions 20 DCMR § 804 3/15/1985 8/28/1995, 60 FR 44431

NOx R A CT 20 DCMR § 805 4/16/2004 12/28/2004, 69 FR 77645,

69 FR 77647

NOx SIP Call 20 DCMR Ch. 10 12/8/2000 12/22/2000, 65 FR 80783

Minor New Source Review (NSR)

and Nonattainment NSR 20 DCMR §§ 200

and 204 (respectively) 4/29/1997 7/31/1997, 62 FR 40937;

12/28/2004, 49 FR 77647

ONROAD MEASURES

High

- Tech (Enhanced) Inspections and

Maintenance Parts of 18 DCMR §§

4, 6, 7, 11, 26, and 99 (varies) 6/11/1999, 64 FR 31498;

4/10/1986, 51 FR 12322
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Warren R. Nelson, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Shells Seafood Restaurants, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; and

(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation.

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:

March 10, 2005

/s/WARRENR. NELSON

Warren R. Nelson

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
SERVED: APRll25, 2012 .{.!::c**;~~.rrl·r,** '1 !: '1 1

- 1 ·**~,** ,. · '""**~** i/ 1 rV r I\ ..... U.S. DEPARTMENT OF**TRANSPORTATIO~}:(;)~!TSF)'Qff~{lO/:J** OFFICE OF HEARINGS · .. · "d•\t. ( f·EhAi IONS WASHINGTON, DC IN THE MATTER OF 'GREAT LAKES AVIATION FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0204 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING

21 p f: :21 This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011NM210022) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. Ronnie A Yoder ,, Chief Administrative Law. Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST

ORIGINAL 

### & ONE COPY

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur WrightBuilding-. Suite 2Wl000 1

ONE COPY
Timothy R. Thornton,

### Respondent's Counsel Briggs and Morgan, P.A. 2200 IDS Center 80 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-2157 TEL: 612-977-8400 FAX: 612-977-8650

Kyle E. Lomazow, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Northwest MountainRegion, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FPC(: 425-227-1007 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0204 (Civil Penalty Action)

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., WilburWrightBuilding-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430.



### -2-
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, in connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Goodrich Corporation
(the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certifies, that, to such officers knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report. Date: May 5, 2005 /s/ Marshall O. LarsenName:
    Marshall O. LarsenTitle:  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Ulrich SchmidtName:
    Ulrich SchmidtTitle:  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**FROZEN
      FOOD EXPRESS INDUSTRIES, INC.**


**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc.
      (the "company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Stoney M. Stubbs, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (a) the Report fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      company.




Dated:
                November 6, 2007
            
            /s/
                Stoney M. Stubbs, Jr.Stoney
                M. Stubbs, Jr.
              Chairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive
                Officer
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section a 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  February      3, 2010 | /s/      Kent M. Yauch                                                                        |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Kent      M. Yauch                                                                            |
|                                   | Vice      President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal financial      officer) |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF BERTHEL GROWTH & INCOME TRUST I AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND THE AUDITED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE TRUST FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,047
<SECURITIES>                                 8,387,598
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,308
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,000,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,461,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          870,995
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,590,958
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,590,958
<SALES>                                        550,725
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               550,725
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               383,496
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                167,229
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            167,229
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   167,229
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    16.70<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    16.70
<FN>
<F1>NET INCOME PER BENEFICIAL SHARE IS BASED ON THE WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF SHARES
OUTSTANDING WHICH WAS 10,013 SHARES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### INDIAN LAKE CLUB, a non-profit corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Reginald G. HAINSWORTH and Ruth B. Hainsworth, et al., Appellees.

No. 69-401.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 1, 1970.

*722Page S. Jackson, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Joe R. Young, Jr., of Bradley, Johnson, Nelson & Young, Lake Wales, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Indian Lake Club v. Hainsworth, Fla.App. 1968, 212 So. 2d 915.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 9, 2018

s0306 

# Order

Clerk March 9, 2018

155856

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155856

COA: 337343

Berrien CC: 04

- 404393

- FC

RODNEY ALLAN HUBBARD,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 4, 2017 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

M ARKMAN

, C.J., ( concurring ).

On defendant’s direct appeal, I concurred in the order denying leave to appeal but

observed “that this Court, in an appropri ate case, should revisit its conclusion in People v

Tobey , 401 Mich 141, 148 (1977), that voiceprint evidence is inadmissible because it has

not ‘achieved general scientific acceptance as a reliable identification device

. . . .’ ”

People v Hubbard , 480 M ich 898 (2007) ( M ARKMAN , J., concurring). I noted that at that

time, “[s]ince Tobey was decided, 11 other states have addressed the admissibility of

voiceprint evidence: five states have admitted such evidence,

. . . and six states have

rejected such evid ence

. . . .” Id . I continue to believe that this Court at some point

should revisit the admissibility of voiceprint evidence; however, in my judgment, this is

not the case to do so because defendant previously submitted the same voiceprint analysis

in c onjunction with his unsuccessful second motion for relief from judgment. Therefore,

defendant cannot receive relief on that basis in the instant motion for relief from

judgment. See MCR 6.508(D)(2). Accordingly, I concur in this Court’s order denying

le ave to appeal.