alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JULY 1, 2000 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED
JULY 1, 2000 FOR GENRAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,639
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,673
<INVENTORY>                                     72,818
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               201,667
<PP&E>                                          96,123
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 366,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,649
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,993
<OTHER-SE>                                     164,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   366,552
<SALES>                                         70,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,324
<CGS>                                           40,740
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,694
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,612)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       581
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,031)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,031)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:FAA-2013-0981
# Official Journal L 121/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.121.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 121 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5410 May 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.121.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 121

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5410 May 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 of 9 May 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision 2011/273/CFSP of 9 May 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Syria | 11 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 of 9 May 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision 2011/273/CFSP of 9 May 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Syria

11

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Clomere HEBERT, Jr., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY et al., Defendants-Relators.

No. 3633.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Aug. 16, 1971.

Voorhies, Labbé, Fontenot, Leonard & McGlasson by J. Winston Fontenot, Lafayette, for defendants-relators.

Frank M. Brame of Brame, Stewart & Bergstedt, Plauche, Sanders, Smith & Hebert by Allen L. Smith, Jr., Scofield & Bergstedt by John B. Scofield, Hall, Rag-gio & Farrar by Richard B. Cappel, Jones, Kimball, Patin, Harper, Tete & Wetherill by John A. Patin, Hunt, Godwin, Painter & Roddy by E. C. Hunt, Jr., Lake Charles, for defendant-respondent.

*392O. J. Weber, Beaumont, Tex., for respondent-plaintiff.

Raleigh Newman, McLeod & Rozas by William L. McLeod, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and CUL-PEPPER, JJ.

SAVOY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in Stanford Benoit et al. v. International Harvester Company et al., 251 So.2d 389 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1971), decided this date, the order of the trial court requiring defendant, Mack Abraham, to produce documents of his financial ability is reversed, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views herein expressed. Costs of this proceeding are assessed to Prior Products, Inc., Respondent in Opposition to Writs.

Reversed and remanded.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RAHEEM WILLIS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 375 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of January, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# Official Journal C 398A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 398A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6225 November 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 398A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6225 November 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Union Intellectual Property Office |
| 2019/C 398 A/01 | Vacancy notice — VEXT/19/72/AD 14/BOA — President BOA | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Union Intellectual Property Office

2019/C 398 A/01

Vacancy notice — VEXT/19/72/AD 14/BOA — President BOA

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 12  

                      GTE NORTH INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY
        Statement of the Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in Millions)                            Nine Months Ended
                                                September 30, 1998
                                                ------------------
<S>                                                 <C>      
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income before extraordinary charge                $   445.2
  Add - Income taxes                                    266.1
      - Fixed charges                                   108.3
                                                    ---------
Adjusted earnings                                   $   819.6
                                                    =========
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                  $    96.1
  Portion of rent expense representing interest          12.2
                                                    ---------
Adjusted fixed charges                              $   108.3
                                                    =========


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                       7.57
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)

                                      For six months      For three months
                                      ended June 30,      ended June 30,
                                      1997       1996      1997      1996

Net income                            ($1,185)   ($4,403)  ($491)    ($2,174)

Shares:

Weighted average number of shares
  of common stock outstanding     3,807,020  3,766,193  3,809,954  3,771,072

Shares assumed issued (less shares
  assumed pruchased for treasury)
  on stock option agreements         1,307      12,663        55      21,712

Rounding                              (327)        144        (9)        216
                                 3,808,000   3,779,000  3,810,000  3,793,000

Net Income per Common Share         ($0.31)     ($1.17)   ($0.13)    ($0.57)
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 616

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to permit members of national

securities exchanges to effect certain transactions with respect to accounts for which such members exercise investment discretion.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. MARKEY (for himself and Mr. FIELDS of Texas) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to permit

members of national securities exchanges to effect certain

transactions with respect to accounts for which such

members exercise investment discretion.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS.

4 Section 11(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of

5 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78k(a)(1)) is amended—

6 (1) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘(other

7 than an investment company)’’;
2

•HR 616 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara2 graph (G);

3 (3) by redesignating subparagraph (H) as sub4 paragraph (I); and

5 (4) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the fol6 lowing new paragraph:

7 ‘‘(H) any transaction for an account with re8 spect to which such member or an associated person

9 thereof exercises investment discretion if such mem10 ber—

11 ‘‘(i) has obtained, from the person or per12 sons authorized to transact business for the ac13 count, express authorization for such member

14 or associated person to effect such transactions

15 prior to engaging in the practice of effecting

16 such transactions;

17 ‘‘(ii) furnishes the person or persons au18 thorized to transact business for the account

19 with a statement at least annually disclosing

20 the aggregate compensation received by the ex21 change member in effecting such transactions;

22 and

23 ‘‘(iii) complies with any rules the Commis24 sion has prescribed with respect to the require25 ments of clauses (i) and (ii); and’’.
3

•HR 616 IH

Æ
Order entered April 17, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00130-CV

KELLEY|WITHERSPOON, LLP, ET AL., Appellants

V.

ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL SERVICES, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-01907-E

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee/cross-appellant’s April 16, 2014 unopposed motion for an 

extension of time to file its initial brief. Under our local rules, appellee/cross-appellant must file 

a combined appellee’s and cross-appellant’s brief. See 5th Tex. App. (Dallas) Loc. R. 10(1)(b). 

Appellee’s combined brief will be due thirty days after appellant’s brief is filed. See 5th Tex. 

App. (Dallas) Loc. R. 10(3)(b). Accordingly, we DENY appellee/cross-appellant’s motion as 

premature.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and the statement of earnings and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000040834
<NAME> GENERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          48,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  289,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,400
<INVENTORY>                                    164,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               562,400
<PP&E>                                         584,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 346,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,382,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          368,000
<BONDS>                                        226,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     535,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,382,800
<SALES>                                        374,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               374,400
<CGS>                                          264,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  343,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
        

</TABLE>
#### Morton, *et al., v.*State, use Seckendorff.

The declaration on an executor’s bond for a legacy is fatally defective unless it alleges an order of the probate court to pay the legacy and a refusal by the executor.

*Held:*That the suit in this' case could not be considered as based on the 191st section of the administrative statute, as it does not seek a recovery for the benefit of all persons' interested in the .estate, nor is the capacity in which the plaintiff sues averred.

*Error to Desha Circuit Court.*

Hon. Vm. M. Harrison, Circuit Judge.

Compton, J.

This was a suit in the name of the State for the use of Ernestine Yon Seckendorff, against the principal and sureties in the bond of an executor.

*47The plaintiff assigned, in her declaration, four breaches of the condition of the bond; and the defendants failing to appear, judgment by default tras entered against them. ’ A jury was then ordered to inquire into the truth of the breaches, and assess the plaintiff’s damages, who found for the defendants • on the first breach, and for the plaintiff on the second, third and fourth breaches, and assessed her damages at $3,800; for which judgment was rendered, and the defendants brought error.

The judgment of the court below can not be sustained. The declaration, though evidently framed with a view to section 191, chap. 4, Gould’s Dig., does not 'seek a recovery for the benefit of all persons interested in the estate, as under that section it should do, for the alleged waste and mismanagement of the estate, but proceeds, in the individual right of the plaintiff' below, for the recovery of the value of a legacy for her sole benefit; which, it is alleged, was bequeathed to her by the testator, and by the executor converted to his own use, making the value of the legacy the measure of the damages claimed. Treating the action as founded on the refusal of the executor to pay the plaintiff below her legacy, the declaration is fatally defective; because it is nowhere averred that the probate court ordered him to pay it. Without such order, and refusal by the executor to obey it, on demand, there was no right of action on his bond. If the suit could be regarded — and we think it can not — as based on the 191st section of the statute, the declaration is equally defective; because, if for no other reason, the capacity in which the plaintiff below sues, whether as legatee, distributee, creditor, or other person interested in the estate, is not averred, such persons only being entitled to sue under this section of the statute. These views are in accordance with the decisions of this court in *State, use of Wallace, v. Ritter, 9 Ark., (4 Eng.,) 244; Porter v. State, use, &c., id., 226;*and *Gordon v. State, use, &c., 11 Ark., (6 Eng.,) 12,*where the questions here involved are fully discussed and settled.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded, with leave.to the plaintiff' in the court below to amend her declaration.
Page 1 of 3

I. COMPLETE PRODUCT

(a) Black ink

(1) Makeready and/or setup...........per page .......... 9,225 $0.50 $4,612.50 $0.40 $3,690.00 NC $0.00 $0.49 $(2) Running...........per page, per 100 copies .......... 109,343 $1.20 $131,211.60 $0.73 $79,820.39 $1.45 $158,547.35 $0.96 $10

TOTAL OFFER: $135,824.10 $83,510.39 $158,547.35 $109

DISCOUNT: 1.00% $1,358.24 3.00% $2,505.31 0.00% $0.00 0.50% $

NET OFFER: $134,465.86 $81,005.08 $158,547.35 $108

FREIGHT CHARGES $16,703.11 

DISCOUNTED OFFER WITH FREIGHT $97,708.19 

Prepared by: TFReviewed by: FM

UNIT 

RATE COST UNIT RATE COS

Alcom Printing 

Marleysville, PA

D & D Business, Inc

Printing 

Willowbrook, I

Bhadra Corporation d/b/a Boss 

and Hughes 

ITEM DESCRIPTION Houston, TX

BASIS 

OF 

AWARD

A+W Graphics 

Dallas, TX

UNIT 

RATE COST

Program 5546-S Contract Term: August 1, 2013 through July 31, 2014 plus four option y

Title: Training Manuals in Black Ink Only, Over 400 Copies

UNIT 

RATE COST
Page 2 of 3

I. COMPLETE PRODUCT

(a) Black ink

(1) Makeready and/or setup...........per page .......... 9,225 $4.00 $36,900.00 $1.00 $9,225.00 $5.00 $46,125.00 $0.46 $4,24(2) Running...........per page, per 100 copies .......... 109,343 $0.70 $76,540.10 $1.70 $185,883.10 $2.50 $273,357.50 $0.66 $72,16

TOTAL OFFER: $113,440.10 $195,108.10 $319,482.50 $76,409

DISCOUNT: 1.00% $1,134.40 0.00% $0.00 1.00% $3,194.83 0.25% $191

NET OFFER: $112,305.70 $195,108.10 $316,287.67 $76,218

FREIGHT CHARGES $16,292

DISCOUNTED OFFER WITH FREIGHT $92,511

Prepared by: TFReviewed by: FM

NPC, Inc 

Claysburg, PA

UNIT RATE COST

UNIT RATE UNIT RATE COST COST UNIT RATE

ITEM DESCRIPTION

BASIS 

OF 

AWARD

Gray Graphics 

Capitol Heights, MD

K-B Offset Printing, Inc 

State College, PA

COST

WBC Inc. d/b/a Lithexcel 

Albuquerque, NM

Program 5546-S Contract Term: August 1, 2013 through July 31, 2014 plus four option y

Title: Training Manuals in Black Ink Only, Over 400 Copies
Page 3 of 3

I. COMPLETE PRODUCT

(a) Black ink

(1) Makeready and/or setup...........per page .......... 9,225 $0.45 $4,151.25 NC $0.00 $0.60 $5,535.00 $0(2) Running...........per page, per 100 copies .......... 109,343 $0.75 $82,007.25 $1.50 $164,014.50 $1.033 $112,951.32 $0

TOTAL OFFER: $86,158.50 $164,014.50 $118,486.32 

DISCOUNT: 4.00% $3,446.34 1.00% $1,640.15 5.00% $5,924.32 2.0

NET OFFER: $82,712.16 $162,374.35 $112,562.00 

FREIGHT CHARGES $11,627.99 

DISCOUNTED OFFER WITH FREIGHT $94,340.15 

Prepared by: TFReviewed by: FM

ITEM DESCRIPTION BASIS OF AWARD

Program 5546-S Contract Term: August 1, 2013 through July 31, 2014 plus four option y

Title: Training Manuals in Black Ink Only, Over 400 Copies

Texas Digital Copy 

San Antonio, TX

The P. A. Hutchison Company 

Mayfield, PA

W

M

UNIT 

RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNI

RAT

TPS Enterprises Inc 

Newton, IL

UNIT RATE COST
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Ray UPTAIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 76-3685

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 26, 1977.

Rehearing Denied June 29, 1977.

*1109Jerry A. Kirby, Monroe, La. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

Donald E. Walter, U. S. Atty., Dosite H. Perkins, Jr., Brian P. Joffrion, Asst. U. S. Attys., Shreveport, La., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before THORNBERRY, RONEY and HILL, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir., see *Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et*al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

After his indictment and arrest for wire fraud, violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, appellant failed to appear in court on the appointed trial date, and was indicted for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3150. At Uptain’s trial for jumping bail, two court-appointed attorneys acted as counsel, and he also questioned some of the witnesses. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. We affirm.

Uptain now brings forward four points, none of which have any merit. He objects to the trial judge’s ruling permitting his attorney to testify as to notice of the trial date given to him; to the attorney’s testimony concerning FBI Agent Cox who was not called as a witness; to the failure of the trial judge to enter a judgment of acquittal; and to the judge’s action in admitting an out-of-court statement Uptain allegedly made.

Counsel’s message to his client concerning the date of trial was not a privileged communication. *See, e. g., United States*v. *Bourassa,*411 F.2d 69 (10 Cir. 1969), cert. *denied,*396 U.S. 915, 90 S.Ct. 235, 24 L.Ed.2d 192 (1969); *United States v. Hall,*346 F.2d 875 (2 Cir. 1965), *cert. denied,*382 U.S. 910, 86 S.Ct. 250, 15 L.Ed.2d 161 (1965). The attorney’s testimony concerning his comments to Agent Cox only uncovered what was already known; *i. e.,*that he had written two letters to Uptain informing him of the date and time of trial. The judge certainly made no error by not granting a judgment of acquittal. Uptain’s guilt was clearly proven. Finally, Uptain’s statement was a volunteered, unsolicited statement that he blurted out during the trial.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS INDUSTRIES, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JUNE 30, 1997, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND
CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,510
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,693
<INVENTORY>                                      9,491
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,381
<PP&E>                                         102,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,730
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,686
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,921
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,693
<SALES>                                         14,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,942
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  146,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,139
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   786
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,923
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,780
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,143
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,143
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>