# CECW

- HS

SUBJECT: Interim Policy for Determining Eligibility Status of Flood Risk Management

Projects for the Rehabilitation Program Pursuant to Public Law (P

. L

. ) 84

- 99

2 direction of the Rehabilitation P rogram and enable its continued implementation while

revis ions to 33 CFR Part 203 (reference 1. f

. ) are developed and promulgated

.

c. This memorandum super s edes the eligibility criteria in A ppendix B of EP 500

- 1

- 1

(reference 1.b.) and supersedes r eference 1. d

. For the current version of the inspection

checklist (entitled Flood Damage Reduction Segment/System Inspection Report), see

Enclosure 2.

d. This memorandum revises the applicab ility of the System

- Wide Improvement

Framework (SWIF) policy in r eference 1. c

.

e. All other policies associated with the Rehabilitation Program including

, but not

limited to, the determination of deferred maintenance activities remain in effect.

f. Eligibility for rehabilitation assistance will be determined pursuant to paragraphs

5 and 6 of this interim policy, which specifies that only a subset of the criteria previously

use d to determine eligibility will continue to be used to make eligibility determinations

during the interim period. Note: v egetation management will not be considered in

making an eligibility determination. A final policy will be established through notice and

comment rulemaking

. Any eligibility criteria eliminated by this interim policy will be

restored, if at all, only through a public rulemaking process.

4

. Applicability

.

a. This policy is effective immediately and applies to all Headquarters ( HQUSACE )

elements, divisions, districts, laboratories, and other field operating activities of USACE.

b. This interim policy provides criteria for eligibility determinations for levee systems

as outlined in p aragraph s 5 and 6 below. Eligibility determinations for channels, dams,

tunnels and debris basins will remain suspended and their status ( either Active or

Inactive) will remain unchanged

.

c. This interim policy does not impact federal coastal storm damage reduction

(CSDR) projects (also known as hurricane and shore protection projects )

. For these

projects

, applicable policies in reference 1.a. still apply.

5

. Eligibility Determination fo r Levee Systems

.

a. Th ese interim eligibility criteria will be used to determine eligibility for

rehabilitation assistance for levee systems until final policy is issued

.

b. Continuing Eligibility for Rehabilitation Assistance

.

# CECW

- HS

SUBJECT: Interim Policy for Determining Eligibility Status of Flood Risk Management

Projects for the Rehabilitation Program Pursuant to Public Law (P

. L

. ) 84

- 99

3 (1) Federal and non

- federal levee systems that are cu rrently Active in the

Rehabilitation Program will be evaluated for continuing eligibility using the interim

eligibility criteria in p aragraph 6. f

. during the next scheduled Continuing Eligibility

Inspection (CEI) or in accordance with Letters of Intent ( LO Is ) and SWIFs (reference

1.c.)

.

(2) Federal and non

- federal l evee systems with a CEI conducted prior to the

date of this memorandum and for which the public sponsor has not been provided an

eligibility determination ( based on reference 1.d. ) will be re evaluated using the interim

eligibility criteria in p aragraph 6. f

. Re evaluations may be conducted using information

from the previous inspection report. T herefore, reinspection may not be necessary

.

(3) Upon request by the public sponsor, federal levee systems that are currently

Inactive in the Rehabilitation Program can be reinspected and reevaluated for eligibility

based on the interim eligibility criteria. Inactive federal levee systems that meet the

interim eligibility criteria may regain Act ive status in the Rehabilitation Program. See

p aragraph 5. c. for more information on Inactive non

- federal levee systems.

(4) Newly constructed federal l evee systems are granted Active status when the

public sponsor assumes operation and maintenance responsibi lities. C EI

determinations for these newly constructed federal levee systems will us e the interim

eligibility criteria in p aragraph 6. f

.

c. Initial Eligibility Inspections (IEIs) for Non

- Federal Levee Systems

.

(1) Non

- federal levee s ystems seeking entry or reentry into the Rehabilitation

Program require an IEI to determine eligibility.

(2) IEIs may be conducted and eligibility determinations will be made using the

interim c riteria provided in p aragraph 6

.

(3) N on

- federal levee syste ms with an IEI conducted prior to the date of this

memorandum and for which the public sponsor has not been provided an eligibility

determination (based on reference 1.d.) will be reevaluated using the interim eligibility

criteria in p aragraph 6. e

.

d. Levee Owner’s Manual and Operation s and Maintenance Responsibilities

.

(1) For non

- federal levee systems, the Levee Owner’s Manual (reference 1. e .)

wi l l continue to serve as a m aintenance reference document. T he eligibility criteria in

the Levee Owner’s Manual that must be met to gain and maintain an Active status in the

# CECW

- HS

SUBJECT: Interim Policy for Determining Eligibility Status of Flood Risk Management

Projects for the Rehabilitation Program Pursuant to Public Law (P

. L

. ) 84

- 99

4 Rehabilitation Program are superseded by this memorandum. Districts will ensure that

public sponsors of non

- federal levee s ystems are aware of these changes.

(2) USACE encourages pub lic sponsors to follow the m aintenance practices in

the Levee Owner’s Manual as an element of best practices in flood risk management

.

(3) USACE will use this interim policy to determine eligibility for the

Rehabilitation Program for f ederal levee syst ems

. Public sponsors of federal levee

systems normally have obligations regarding how they operate and maintain the levee

systems under the authorizing legislation and the terms of the project cooperation

agreement with USACE

. These obligations are independent of any decision to

participate in the R ehabilitation Program.

6

. Interim R ehabilitation P rogram Eligibility Requirements for Levee Systems

. The

following section is in reference to Enclosure 2

, the Flood Damage Reduction

Segment/System Inspection Report (also referred to as Inspection Checklist).

a. The Inspection Checklist will continue to be used for all levee system inspections

. The full inspection report will be provided to public sponsors to provide a complete

ass essment of the levee condition. The full inspection results including an overall

system rating and description of specific deficiencies are critical information public

sponsors need to effectively operate and maintain their levee system, prioritize any

re pairs or improvements and conduct communication and risk reduction activities

. The

overall levee segment and overall levee system ratings will continue to be assigned in

accordance with Enclosure 2 , Sections F

- G on page B

- 5

. Providing up to two year s to

correct Unacceptable items still applies and will still be used to determine the overall

system rating. However

, the overall system rating will no longer be used to determine

status in the Rehabilitation Program. As such Enclosure 2, Section H on pag e B

- 5 does

not apply. Instead paragraphs 6. e . and 6. f . of this interim policy will be used to

determine Active or Inactive status.

b. In accordance with current policy, eligibility determinations will be based on a

levee system basis. If a levee system comprise s more than one levee segment, all

segments must meet the interim eligibility criteria , identified in paragraph s 6.e

. and 6. f

., for the entire levee system to be Active. If one levee segment does not meet the interim

eligibility criteria, the entire levee system will be Inactive.

c. C hannels that are integral to a levee system will be inspected as part of th at

levee system , using existing channel

- related inspection items . However, eligibility

determinations will be based on the levee system. Therefore

, if a levee system is

deemed Active, the associated channel is also considered to be Active and eligible for

rehabilitation assistance.

# CECW

- HS

SUBJECT: Interim Policy for Determining Eligibility Status of Flood Risk Management

Projects for the Rehabilitation Program Pursuant to Public Law (P

. L

. ) 84

- 99

5 d. If inspectors encounter con ditions that put the inspectors at personal risk or

conditions that make it impossible to conduct the inspection, including evaluating the

interim eligibility c riteria, the inspector will end the inspection. The levee system will be

deemed Inactive and reconsideration of status will not occur until final policy issuance or

th e public sponsor may pursue a SWIF ( paragraph 7 and reference 1.c

. ).

e. N on

- federal levee systems must meet all the Ini tial Eligibility requirements of

Enclosure 2

, pages B

- 7 through B

- 9, in addition to the req uire ments identified in

p aragraph 6

. f

. for CEIs.

f. Requirements for eligibility under a C E I

.

(1) All public sponsors must complete the maintenance program information on

page B

- 2 of Enclosure 2.

(2) For non

- federal levee systems, confirmat ion that Initial Eligibility Items 1

- 5 on

page B

- 7 of Enclosure 2 continue to be met and must be documented in the CEI

.

(3) Levee segment/ system has received an Individual Item/Component Rating of

Acceptable or Minimally Acceptable for the following items , which are a subset of the

items of the existing Inspection Checklist :

Levee Embankments

Rated Item Page Number,

Enclosure 2 Item Number

Encroachments B

- 11 3

Closure Structures (Stop Log, Earthen Closures,

Gates, or Sandbags Closures ) B

- 11 4

Slope Stability B

- 12 5

Erosion/Bank Caving B

- 12 6

Animal Control B

- 13 10

Culverts/Discharge Pipes (This item includes both

concrete and corrugated metal pipes.) B

- 13 11

Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe Drainage Systems B

- 14 14

Floodwalls

Rated Item Page Number,

Enclosure 2 Item Number

Encroachments B

- 16 2

Closure Structures (Stop Log Closures and Gates) B

- 16 3

Tilting, Sliding, or Settlement of Concrete Structures B

- 17 5

Foundation of Concrete Structures B

- 17 6

Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe Drainage Systems B

- 18 8

# CECW

- HS

SUBJECT: Interim Policy for Determining Eligibility Status of Flood Risk Management

Projects for the Rehabilitation Program Pursuant to Public Law (P

. L

. ) 84

- 99

6 Interior Drainage System

Rated Item Page Number,

Enclosure 2 Item Number

Culverts/Discharge Pipes B

- 21 9

Sluice/Slide Gates B

- 21 10

Flap Gates/Flap Valves/Pinch Valves B

- 22 11

Pump Stations

Rated Item Page Number,

Enclosure 2 Item Number

Intake and Discharge Pipelines B

- 27 17

Sluice/Slide Gates B

- 27 18

Flap Gates/Flap Valves/Pinch Valves B

- 27 19



# A summary lis t o f the R ated Items that are to be used to determine status for the

Rehabili t ation Program can be found in Enclosure 3

. Enclosure 3 is an optional

document for communicating eligibility information to the public sponsor.

g. Notification procedures outlined for overall system ratings found in Enclosure 2,

Section J

, on page B

- 6 still apply. Results of an eligibility determination in accordance

with this interim policy (paragraph s 6.e. and 6.f.) will be included as part of the final

Inspection Report package provided to the public s ponsor

.

7

. Policy on SWIF Actions

.

a. The policy for the implementation of SW IFs was issued on 29 November 2011

( reference 1. c

. )

. This policy creates a process for working with public sponsors to plan

and implemen t system

- wide improvements. The process consists of a LOI that leads to

the develop ment of a long

- term SWIF , which also provide s for environmental

compliance

. The following paragraphs provide additional detail for processing LOIs and

SWIFs as p art of this interim policy.

b. The policy for SWIFs remains in effect and USACE will continue to process LOIs

a nd SWIFs from public sponsors. Public sponsors are encouraged to continue to

develop SWIFs to improve the performance and reliability of their levee systems.

c. For LOIs that have been approved by HQUSACE, districts will notify the public

spo nsor in writing of its options to : 1) retain its current LOI ; 2) adjust its LOI (and

subsequently its draft SWIF) to focus on actions to address deficiencies to meet the

interim eligibility criteria outlined in p aragraph 6; or 3) terminate its LOI if the i nterim

eligibility criteria can be met without fur ther system

- wide improvements. Public

sponsors must submit notification in writing of their selected option within 60 days of

# CECW

- HS

SUBJECT: Interim Policy for Determining Eligibility Status of Flood Risk Management

Projects for the Rehabilitation Program Pursuant to Public Law (P

. L

. ) 84

- 99

7 district notification. If the public sponsor chooses to adjust its LOI, the sponsor will

provide the district with the proposed changes as p art of its written response. The

district will determine if the changes are sufficient to meet the intent of the SWIF policy

and address the interim eligibility criteria. If the district det ermines the changes are

sufficient, the district will approve the changes to the LOI

, notify the public sponsor

, and

amend the LOI documentation

. The timeline to develop the SWIF ( up to two years) may

be extended as deemed appropriate by the district, not to exceed one additional year.

The f inal amended document will be submitted to the division, the HQ USACE P

. L

. 84

- 99 Program Manager and the HQUSACE point of contact for SWIF.

d. For SWIFs accepted by HQUSACE , districts will notify the public sponsor in

writing of its options to : 1) retain its current SWIF ; 2) adjust its SWIF to focus on actions

to address deficiencies to meet the interim eligibility criteria outlined in paragraph 6; or

3) terminate its SWIF if the interim eligibility criteria can be met without fur ther system

wide improvements. Public sponsors must submit notification in writing of their selected

option within 60 day s of the district notification. If the public sponsor chooses to adjust

its SWIF, the sponsor will provide the district with the proposed changes as p art of its

written response. The district will determine if the changes are sufficient to meet the

intent of the SWIF policy and address th e interim eligibility criteria. If the d istrict

determines the changes are sufficient, the district will approve the changes to the SWIF

, notify the public sponsor and amend the SWIF documentation. The f inal amended

document will be submitted to the division, the HQ USACE P

. L

. 84

- 99 Program Manager

and the H QUSACE point of contact for SWIF

.

e. For LOIs under development, districts will provide public sponsors with the

interim eligibility criteria and their options to: 1) continue to focus the LOI to address all

system

- wide deficiencies; 2) adjust the LOI to focus on actions to address deficiencies

to meet the interim eligibility criteria outlined in paragraph 6 ; or 3) discontinue the LOI

development if the interim elig ibility criteria can be met without further system

- wide

improvements.

f. Environmental compliance and consideration of other requirements, such as

compliance with the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and treaties with Tribes

, must

continue to be integrated into and accomplished as part of an accepted SWIF’s

implementation. Note that the acceptance of a SWIF does not require environmental

compliance because that action only establishes a plan for future action without any

irreversible commitment of resources. Ho wever, the public sponsor’s implementation of

the actions agreed to in the SWIF may trigger environmental compliance requirements,

in which case USACE is responsible for assuring compliance with all applicable

environmental requirements prior to implementa ti on of any SWIF action by the public

sponsor that would affect the environment or other resources. A ny ESA compliance

that is determined to be required for the implementation of a SWIF will be accompl ished

# A

- 1

Enclosure 1: Terms U sed in this D ocument

Active

. A s tatus applied to flood risk management projects concerning participation in the

Rehabilitation Program under the authority of P

. L

. 84

- 99. An Active project must have

met USAC E criteria for entry into the R ehabilitation P rogram . Only Active projects may

receive rehabilitation assistance to repair damages caused by a flood event or coastal

storm.

Continuing Eligibility Inspection (CEI)

. An evaluation of Active federal and non

- f ederal

flood risk management projects conducted in order to make a status determination for the

Rehabilitation Program. Inactive federal flood risk management projects can regain

Active status as a result of a CEI.

Federal Levee System

. For the purposes of this inte rim policy

, a f ederal l evee system

means a levee system that is federally authorized and constructed, with a public sponsor

being responsible for o peration s , maintenance, repair, r eplac ement and r ehabilitation

(OMRR&R)

.

Inactive

. A status applied to flood risk management project s concerning participation in

the Rehabilitation Program under the authority of P

. L

. 84

- 99. Inactive projects include

formerly Active non

- f ederal projects that left Active status voluntarily or non

- f ederal and

f ederal ly authorized projects that have been determined by USACE to no longer meet the

eligibility criteria.

Initial Eligibility Inspection (IEI)

. An evaluation conducted to make a status determination

of non

- f ederal flood risk management projects that are either currently Inactive or that are

seeking to gain entry into the Rehabilitation Program for the first time.

Levee Feature

. A levee feature is a structure that is critical to the functioning of a levee

system. Examples include embankment sect ions, floodwall sections, closure structures,

pumping sta tions, interior drainage works and flood risk management channels.

Levee Segment

. A levee segment is a discrete portion of a levee system that is operated

and maintained by a single entity. A leve e segment may comprise one or more levee

features.

Levee System

. O ne or more segments of e arthen embankment or floodwall and all

appurtenant structures (such as closures, berms, pumping stations, culverts , and

interior drainage) that are interconnected a nd necessary to ensure exclusion of

floodwater from a defined area.

Non

- Federal Levee System

. For the purposes of this interim policy , the term n on

- f ederal

l evee system will refer to those levee systems that have been constructed by a local

government o r public sponsor. O perations and maintenance is also the responsibility of

the local government or public sponsor

.

# A

- 2

Public Sponsor. For purposes of this interim policy , a public sponsor is a public entity that

is a legally constituted public body with full authority and capability to perform the terms of

its agreement as the non

- federal partner of USACE for a project. A public sponsor may

be a state, county, city, town, federally recognized Indian Tribe or tribal organizat ion,

Alaska Native Corporation or any political subpart of a state or group of states.Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportName of Segment / System:Public Sponsor(s):Public Sponsor Representative:Sponsor Phone:Sponsor Email:Corps of Engineers Inspector:Date of Inspection:Inspection Report Prepared By:Date Report Prepared:Internal Technical Review (for Periodic Inspections) By:Date of ITR:Final Approved By:Date Approved:Initial Eligibility InspectionOverall Segment / System Rating:AcceptableContinuing Eligibility Inspection (Routine)Minimally AcceptableType of Inspection:Continuing Eligibility Inspection (Periodic)UnacceptableInstructionsInitial Eligibility InspectionGeneral Items for All Flood Control WorksLevee EmbankmentConcrete FloodwallsSheet Pile and Concrete I-wallsInterior Drainage SystemPump StationsContents of Report:FDR System ChannelsNote: In addition to the report contents indicated here, a plan view drawing ofthe system, with stationing, should be included with this report to referencelocations of items rated less than acceptable. Photos of general systemcondition and any noted deficiencies should also be attached.US Army Corpsof Engineers®Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemPublic Sponsor Pre-Inspection FormUS Army Corpsof Engineers®The following information is to be provided by the levee district sponsor prior to an inspection. This information will be used to help evaluate the organizational capability of thelevee district to manage the levee segment / system maintenance program.1. Levee segment / system and district: (name of the segment / system and levee district)2. Reporting period: (month/day/year to month/day/year)3. Summary of maintenance required by last inspection report:4. Summary of maintenance performed this reporting period:5. Summary of maintenanceplanned next reporting period:6. Summary of changes to segment / system since last inspection:7. Problems/ issues requiring the assistance of the US Army Corps of Engineers:Pre-Inspection FormPage 1 of 2Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Pre-Inspection FormPage 2 of 2Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Public Sponsor Pre-Inspection ReportThe following information is to be provided by the levee district sponsor prior to an inspection8. Levee district organization: (elected orappointed levee district officials and key employees)NamePositionMailing AddressPhone NumberEmail AddressGeneral InstructionsPage 1 of 3Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUSArmyCorpsofEngineers®General Instructions for the Inspection ofFlood Damage Reduction Segments / SystemsA.Purpose of USACE Inspections:The primary purpose of these inspections is to prevent loss oflife and catastrophic damages; preserve the value of Federal investments, and to encourage non-Federal sponsors to bear responsibility fortheir own protection. Inspections shouldassure that Flood Damage Reduction structures and facilities are continually maintained and operated as necessary to obtain the maximum benefits. Inspectionsare also conducted to determine eligibility for Rehabilitation Assistance under authority of PL84-99 for Federal and non-Federal systems. (ER 1130-2-530, ER 500-1-1)B.Types of Inspections:The Corps conducts several types of inspections ofFlood Damage Reduction systems, as outlined below:Continuing Eligibility InspectionsInitial Eligibility InspectionsRoutine InspectionsPeriodic InspectionsIEIs are conducted to determine whether a nonFederally constructedFlood Damage Reductionsystem meets the minimum criteria and standards setforth by the Corps for initial inclusion into theRehabilitation and Inspection Program.RIs are intended to verify propermaintenance, ownerpreparedness, and componentoperation.PIs are intended to verify proper maintenance and component operation and to evaluate operational adequacy,structural stability, and safety of the system. Periodic Inspections evaluate the system's original design criteriavs. current design criteria to determine potential performance impacts, evaluate the current conditions, andcompare the design loads and design analysis used against current design standards. This is to be done toidentify components and features for the sponsor thatneed to be monitored more closely over time orcorrected as needed. (Periodic Inspections are used as the basis of risk assessments.)C.Inspection Boundaries:Inspections should be conducted so as to rate each Flood Damage Reduction "Segment" of the system. The overall system ratingwill be the lowest segment rating in the system.ProjectSystemSegmentA flood damage reduction project is made up of oneor more flood damage reduction systems which wereunder the same authorization.A flood damage reduction system is made up of one or more flood damagereduction segments which collectivelyprovide flood damage reduction to adefined area. Failure of one segment within a system constitutes failure of theentire system. Failure of one systemdoes not affect another system.A flood damage reduction segmentis defined as a discreteportion of a flood damage reductionsystem that is operated andmaintained by a single entity. A flood damage reductionsegment can be made up of one or more features (levee,floodwall, pump stations, etc).D.Land Use Definitions:The following three definitions are intended for use in determining minimum required inspection intervals and initial requirements for inclusion into the Rehabilitation and Inspection Program.Inspections should be considered for all systems that wouldresult in significant environmental or economic impact upon failure regardless of specific land use.AgriculturalRuralUrbanProtected population in the range of zero to 5households per square mile protected.Protected population in the rangeof 6 to 20 households per squaremile protected.Greater than 20 households per square mile; major industrial areas with significant infrastructure investment.Some protected urban areas have no permanent population but may be industrial areas with high valueinfrastructure with no overnight population.General InstructionsPage 2 of 3Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUSArmyCorpsofEngineers®E.Use of the Inspection Report Template:The report template is intended for use inall Army Corps of Engineers inspectionsof levee and floodwall systems and flood damage reduction channels. The section of the template labeled “InitialEligibility" only needs to be completed during Initial Eligibility Inspections of Non-Federally constructed Flood Damage Reduction Systems. The section labeled "General Items" needs to be completedwith every inspection, along with all other sections that correspond to features in the system. The section labeled "Public Sponsor Pre-Inspection Report" is intended for completion before the inspection,if possible.F.Individual Item / Component Ratings:Assessment of individual components rated during the inspection should be based on the criteria provided in the inspection report template, though inspectors may incorporate additional items into thereport based on the characteristics of the system. The assessment of individual components should be based on the following definitions.Acceptable ItemMinimally Acceptable ItemUnacceptable ItemThe inspected item is insatisfactory condition, withno deficiencies, and will function as intended duringthe next flood event.The inspected item has one or more minor deficiencies that need to becorrected. The minor deficiency or deficiencies will not seriously impair thefunctioning of the item as intended during the next flood event.The inspected item has one or more serious deficiencies thatneed to be corrected. The seriousdeficiency or deficiencies willseriously impair the functioning of the item as intended duringthe next flood event.G.Overall Segment / System Ratings:Determination of the overall system ratingis based on the definitions below. Notethat an Unacceptable System Rating may beeither based on an engineering determination that concluded that noteddeficiencies would prevent the system from functioning as intended during the next flood event, or based on the sponsor's demonstrated lack of commitment or inabilityto correct serious deficiencies in atimely manner.Acceptable SystemMinimally Acceptable SystemUnacceptable SystemAll items or components are rated as Acceptable.One or moreitems are rated as Minimally Acceptable or one or more items arerated as Unacceptable and an engineering determination concludes that theUnacceptable items would not prevent the segment / system from performingas intended during the next flood event.One or more items are rated as Unacceptable and would preventthe segment / system from performing as intended, or a seriousdeficiency noted in past inspections (which had previouslyresulted in a minimally acceptable system rating) has not beencorrected within the established timeframe, not to exceed twoyears.H.Eligibility for PL84-99Rehabilitation Assistance:Inspected systems that are not operated and maintained by theFederal government may be Active in the Corps' Rehabilitation andInspection Program (RIP) and eligible for rehabilitation assistance fromthe Corps as defined below:If the Overall System Rating is AcceptableIf the Overall System Rating is MinimallyAcceptableIf the Overall System Rating is UnacceptableThe system is active in the RIP and eligible forPL84-99 rehabilitation assistance.The system is Active in the RIP duringthe time that it takes to make neededcorrections. Active systems are eligible for rehabilitation assistance.However, if the sponsor does not present USACE with proof that seriousdeficiencies (which had previously resulted in a minimally acceptable systemrating) were corrected within the established timeframe, then the system willbecome Inactive in the RIP.The system is Inactive in the RIP, and the status will remainInactive until the sponsor presentsUSACE with proof that allitems rated Unacceptable have been corrected. Inactive systemsare ineligible for rehabilitation assistance.General InstructionsPage 3 of 3Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUSArmyCorpsofEngineers®I.Reporting:After the inspection, the Corps is responsible for assembling an inspection report (or a summary report if it was a Periodic Inspection) including the following information:a.All sections of the report template used during theinspection, including the cover andpre-inspection materials. (Supplemental data collected, and any sections of the template thatweren't used during the inspection do not need to be included with the report.)b.Photos of the general system condition and noted deficiencies.c.A plan view drawing of the system, with stationing,to reference locations of items rated less than acceptable.d.The relative importance of the identified maintenance issues should be specified in the transmittal letter.e.If the Overall System Rating is Minimally Acceptable,the report needs to establish a timeframe for correction of serious deficiencies noted (not to exceed two years) and indicatethat if these items are not corrected within the required timeframe, the system willbe rated as Unacceptable and made Inactivein the Rehabilitation Inspection Program.J.Notification:Reports are to be disseminated as followswithin 30 days of the inspection date.If the Overall System Rating is AcceptableIf the Overall System Rating is MinimallyAcceptableIf the Overall System Rating is UnacceptableReports need to be provided to the local sponsor andthe county emergency management agency.Reports need to be provided to the local sponsor, state emergency managementagency, county emergency management agency, and to the FEMA region.Reports need to be provided to the local sponsor, stateemergency management agency, county emergency managementagency, FEMA region, and tothe Congressional delegationwithin 30 days of the inspection.Initial EligibilityFor use only during Initial Eligibility Inspections of Non-Federally Constructed Flood Damage Reduction Segments / SystemsRated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsAThe Public Sponsor is a legally constituted public body with full authority and capability toperform the terms of its agreement as the non-Federal partner of the Corps for a segment / system,able to pay damages, if necessary, in the event ofits failure to perform. The public sponsor maybe a State, County, City, Town, Federally recognized Indian Tribe or tribal organization, AlaskaNative Corporation, or any political subpart of a State or group of states that has the legal andfinancial authority and capability to provide the necessary cash contributions and the lands,easements, rights-of-way, relocations, borrow, and dredged or excavated materials disposal areas(LERRD's) necessary for the segment / system, and who could legally hold and save the Federalgovernment free from damages that could potentially arise during post-flood rehabilitations orother work on the segment / system.1.Public Sponsor(A or U only)UThe segment / system does not have a public sponsor as defined above.AThe principal function of the segment / systemis to protect people or property from floods.2.Flood Protection(A or U only)UThe segment / system was built or is primarily usedfor channel alignment,navigation, recreation,fish and wildlife, land reclamation, drainage, to protect against land erosion or tidal inflows, or forsome other non-flood related purpose.ASegment / System construction is fully completed.3.Segment /SystemCompletion(A or U only)UThe segment / system is still under construction.AAppropriate local, State, tribal, and/or Federal permits (right-of-way, easements, regulatorypermits, etc.), or waivers thereof, have been obtained for FDR segment / system construction andsubsequent modifications. The segment / system was constructed in accordance with allapplicable Federal, state and local codes, ordinances, and applicable laws.4.ConstructionCompliance(A or U only)UThe appropriate permits (or waivers thereof) havenot been obtained for the segment / system, orthe segment / system was not constructed in accordance with applicable codes, ordinances, andlaws.AIn the case of a levee segment / system, the levee is a primary levee or is a secondary levee whichis designed to protect human life.UThe levee is a secondary levee and was not designed to protect human life.5.Primary LeveeN/AThe FDR segment / system is not a levee segment / system.Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionInitial EligibilityPage 1 of 3Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Initial EligibilityFor use only during Initial Eligibility Inspections of Non-Federally Constructed Flood Damage Reduction Segments / SystemsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionInitial EligibilityPage 2 of 3Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsA• Urban Levees and Floodwalls- Minimum elevation corresponding to a flood level with 10%probability of occurring in a given year (10-year flood).• Agricultural Levees and Floodwalls- Minimum elevation corresponding to a flood level with20% probability of occurring in a given year (5-year flood).• Flood Damage Reduction Channels- Minimum capacity is for a flood with a 10% probabilityof occurring in a given year (10-year flood).Improved channels must additionally providedrainage for at least 1.5 square miles of land and have a capacity of at least 800 cfs. (Interiordrainage channels within the protected area of a levee segment / system are not considered to beflood damage reduction channels under the RIP.)6.MinimumElevation1(A or U only)UThe FDR segment / system does not meet requirements for minimum elevation, capacity, ordrainage area.AThe physical location, cross section, and other design elements of the FDR system are sufficient toprovide reliable flood protection. The FDR segment / system forms a properly closed segment /system. See Table 5-4, EP 500-1-1.7.PhysicalLocation andCross Section (Aor U only)UThe FDR segment / system was not constructed inan appropriate location, does not have anappropriate cross section, is not a properly closed segment / system, or has other shortcomingswith design elements necessary for providing reliable flood damage reduction.AEmbankment fill material is uniform and adequately compacted throughout the entire FDRsegment / system, and the type of embankment material is suitable to prevent slides and seepageproblems.8.Embankment FillMaterial2UEmbankment fill material is not uniform, or there is no compaction and evidence indicates a needfor compaction, or the type of embankment materialis unsuitable and is likely to contribute to thedevelopment of slides or seepage problems.AFoundation material and construction methods adequately address piping, sand boils, seepage, orsettlements that would reduce the level of protection.9.Foundations2UFoundation material and construction methods are such that excessive uncontrolled seepage, sandboils, and piping will occur. Performance historyindicates significant uncontrolled seepage, sandboils or piping.AErosion protection is capable of handling the designed flow velocity for the level of protection forthe entire FDR segment / system. The FDR segment/ system is protected against bank caving andslides in all necessary areas, and has adequatedrainage to protect FDR segment / system slopesfrom runoff erosion.10.Erosion ControlUErosion protection is not present and there is evidence indicating a need for erosion protection.Initial Eligibilityly during Initial Eligibility Inspections of Non-Federally Constructed Flood Damage Reduction Segments / SystemsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionInitial EligibilityPage 3 of 3Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportForuse onUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsAGiven the level of protection provided by the FDR system, interior drainage structures areappropriately sized, situated, and constructed tomove anticipated runoffand seepage out of theprotected area. Pump stations will not becomeinundated during regular operation and their powersystem is adequately designed and reliable.UInterior drainage structures are undersized, poorly constructed,poorly situated, or unreliablydesigned.11.Interior DrainageSystem3(includingculverts, gates,pump stations)N/AThe issue of interior drainage does not apply to this type of FDR segment / system.AStructures are designed and constructed to withstand anticipated loadings.12.Structures3UStructures are unreliably designed or inadequately constructed.1Depending on available data and local Corps policy, the minimumelevation required may be calculated using traditional methods,with the addition of 1 foot of freeboard inagricultural areas and 2 feet of freeboard in urban areas, orusing annual exceedance probability, which numerically accounts for the natural variation and uncertainty whenestimating discharge-probability and stage-discharge functions so thatadditional requirements forelevation are based on the level of uncertainty in the data.2This item should be evaluated based on a review of performance history.If this is not available, some form of engineering assessment is required.3Documentation (plans, at a minimum) required for any necessary engineering evaluation is to be provided by the public sponsor.General Items for All Flood DamageReduction Segments / SystemsFor use during all inspections of all Flood Damage Reduction Segments / SystemsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionGeneral Items for All Flood Damage ReductionSegments / SystemsPage 1 of 1Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsALevee Owner's Manual, O&M Manuals, and/ormanufacturer's operating instructions arepresent.MSponsor manuals are lost or missing or out of date; however, sponsor will obtain manualsprior to next scheduled inspection.1.Operations andMaintenanceManualsUSponsor has not obtained lost or missing manuals identified during previous inspection.AThe sponsor maintains a stockpile of sandbags, shovels, and other flood fight supplies whichwill adequately supply all needs for the initialdays of a flood fight. Sponsor determinesrequired quantity of supplies after consulting with inspector.2.EmergencySupplies andEquipment(A or M only)MThe sponsor does not maintain an adequate supply of flood fighting materials as part of theirpreparedness activities.ASponsor has a written system-specific flood response plan and a solid understanding of how tooperate, maintain, and staff the FDR system during a flood. Sponsor maintains a list ofemergency contact information for appropriate personnel and other emergency responseagencies.3.FloodPreparedness andTraining(A or M only)MThe sponsor maintains a good working knowledge of flood response activities, butdocumentation of system-specific emergency procedures and emergency contact personnel isinsufficient or out of date.Levee EmbankmentsFor use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of levee segments / systemsRated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsAThe levee has little or no unwanted vegetation (trees, bush, or undesirable weeds), except forvegetation that is properly contained and/or situated on overbuilt sections, such that themandatory 3-foot root-free zone is preserved around the levee profile. The levee has beenrecently mowed. The vegetation-free zone extends 15 feet from both the landside andriverside toes of the levee to the centerline of the tree. If the levee access easement doesn'textend to the described limits, then the vegetation-free zone must be maintained to theeasement limits. Reference EM 1110-2-301 or Corps policy for regional vegetation variance.MMinimal vegetation growth (brush, weeds, or trees2 inches in diameter or smaller) is presentwithin the zones described above. This vegetation must be removed but does not currentlythreaten the operation or integrity of the levee.1.UnwantedVegetationGrowth1USignificant vegetation growth (brush, weeds, or any trees greater than 2 inches in diameter) ispresent within the zones described above and mustto be removed to reestablish or ascertainlevee integrity.AThere is good coverage of sod over the levee.MApproximately 25% of the sod cover is missingor damaged over a significant portion or oversignificant portions of the levee embankment. This may be the result of over-grazing orfeeding on the levee, unauthorized vehicular traffic, chemical or insect problems, or burningduring inappropriate seasons.UOver 50% of the sod cover is missing or damaged over a significant portion or portions of thelevee embankment.2.Sod CoverN/ASurface protection is provided by other means.ANo trash, debris, unauthorized farming activity,structures, excavations, or other obstructionspresent within the easement area. Encroachments have been previously reviewed by theCorps, and it was determined that they donot diminish proper functioning of the levee.MTrash, debris, unauthorized farming activity, structures, excavations, or other obstructionspresent, or inappropriate activities noted that should be corrected but will not inhibitoperations and maintenance or emergency operations. Encroachments have not beenreviewed by the Corps.3.EncroachmentsUUnauthorized encroachments or inappropriate activities noted are likely to inhibit operationsand maintenance, emergency operations, or negatively impact the integrity of the levee.4.Closure Structures(Stop Log,Earthen Closures,Gates, or SandbagAClosure structure in good repair. Placing equipment, stoplogs, and other materials are readilyavailable at all times. Components are clearly marked and installation instructions/procedures readily available. Trial erections have been accomplished in accordance with theO&M Manual.Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionLevee EmbankmentsPage 1 of 5Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Levee EmbankmentsFor use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of levee segments / systemsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionLevee EmbankmentsPage 2 of 5Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsUAny of the following issues is cause for this rating: Closure structure in poor condition. Partsmissing or corroded. Placing equipment may notbe available within the anticipated warningtime. The storage vaults cannot be opened during the time of inspection. Components ofclosure are not clearly marked and installation instructions/ procedures are not readilyavailable. Trial erections have not been accomplished in accordance with the O&M Manual.Closures)(A or U only)N/AThere are no closure structures along this component of the FDR segment / system.ANo slides, sloughs, tension cracking, slopedepressions, or bulges are present.MMinor slope stability problems that do not posean immediate threat to the levee embankment.5.Slope StabilityUMajor slope stability problems (ex.deep seated sliding) identified that must be repaired toreestablish the integrity of the levee embankment.ANo erosion or bank caving is observed on the landward or riverward sides of the levee thatmight endanger its stability.MThere are areas where minor erosion is occurring or has occurred on or near the leveeembankment, but levee integrity is not threatened.6.Erosion/ BankCavingUErosion or caving is occurring or has occurred that threatens the stability and integrity of thelevee. The erosion or caving has progressed into the levee section or into the extendedfootprint of the levee foundation and has compromised the levee foundation stability.ANo observed depressions in crown. Recordsexist and indicate nounexplained historicalchanges.MMinor irregularities that do not threaten integrity of levee. Records are incomplete orinclusive.7.Settlement2UObvious variations in elevationover significant reaches. No records exist or records indicatethat design elevation is compromised.AThere are scattered, shallow ruts, pot holes, or other depressions on the levee that areunrelated to levee settlement. The levee crown, embankments, and access road crowns arewell established and drain properly without any ponded water.MThere are some infrequent minor depressions less than 6 inches deep in the levee crown,embankment, or access roads that will pond water.8.Depressions/RuttingUThere are depressions greater than 6 inches deep that will pond water.AMinor longitudinal, transverse, or desiccationcracks with no vertical movement along thecrack. No cracks extend continuously through the levee crest.9.CrackingMLongitudinal and/or transverse cracks up to 6 inches in depth with no vertical movement alongthe crack. No cracks extend continuously through the levee crest. Longitudinal cracks are nolonger than the height of the levee.Levee EmbankmentsFor use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of levee segments / systemsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionLevee EmbankmentsPage 3 of 5Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsUCracks exceed 6 inches in depth. Longitudinal cracks are longer than the height of the leveeand/or exhibit vertical movement along the crack. Transverse cracks extend through the entirelevee width.AContinuous animal burrow control program in place that includes the elimination of activeburrowing and the filling in of existing burrows.MThe existing animal burrow control program needs to be improved. Several burrows arepresent which may lead to seepage or slopestability problems, and they require immediateattention.10.Animal ControlUAnimal burrow control program is not effective oris nonexistent. Significant maintenance isrequired to fill existing burrows, and the levee will not provide reliable flood protection untilthis maintenance is complete.AThere are no breaks, holes, cracks in the discharge pipes/ culverts that would result insignificant water leakage. The pipe shape is stillessentially circular. All joints appear to beclosed and the soil tight. Corrugated metal pipes, if present, are in good condition with 100%of the original coating still in place (either asphalt or galvanizing) or have been relined withappropriate material, which is still in good condition. Condition of pipes has been verifiedusing television camera video taping or visualinspection methods within the past five years,and the report for everypipe is available for review bythe inspector.MThere are a small number of corrosion pinholes or cracks that could leak water and need to berepaired, but the entire length of pipe is still structurally sound and is not in danger ofcollapsing. Pipe shape may be ovalized in some locations but does not appear to beapproaching a curvature reversal. A limited number of joints may have opened and soil lossmay be beginning. Any open joints should be repaired prior to the next inspection.Corrugated metal pipes, if present, may be showing corrosion and pinholes but there are noareas with total section loss. Condition of pipes has been verified using television cameravideo taping or visual inspection methods within the past five years, and the report for everypipe is available for review by the inspector.UCulvert has deterioration and/or has significant leakage; it is in danger of collapsing or asalready begun to collapse. Corrugated metalpipes have suffered 100% section loss in theinvert. HOWEVER: Even if pipes appear to be in good condition, as judged by an externalvisual inspection, an Unacceptable Rating willbe assigned if the condition of pipes has notbeen verified using television camera video taping or visual inspection methods within thepast fiveyears, and reports for allpipes are not available for review bythe inspector.11.Culverts/Discharge Pipes3(This itemincludes bothconcrete andcorrugated metalpipes.)N/AThere are no discharge pipes/ culverts.12.RiprapRevetments &ANo riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to theintegrity of channel bank. Riprap intact with no woody vegetation present.Levee EmbankmentsFor use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of levee segments / systemsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionLevee EmbankmentsPage 4 of 5Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsMMinor riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to theintegrity of the channel bank. Unwanted vegetation must be cleared or sprayed with anappropriate herbicide.USignificant riprap displacement,exposure of bedding, or stonedegradation observed. Scouractivity is undercutting banks, eroding embankments, or impairing channel flows by causingturbulence or shoaling. Rockprotection is hidden bydense brush,trees,orgrasses.Bank ProtectionN/AThere is no riprap protecting this feature of the segment /system, or riprap is discussed inanother section.AExisting revetment protection is properly maintained, undamaged, and clearly visible.MMinor revetment displacement or deterioration that does not pose an immediate threat to theintegrity of the levee. Unwanted vegetation must be cleared or sprayed with an appropriateherbicide.USignificant revetment displacement, deterioration, or exposure of bedding observed. Scouractivity is undercutting banks, eroding embankments, or impairing channel flows by causingturbulence or shoaling. Revetmentprotection is hidden bydensebrush and trees.13.Revetments otherthan RiprapN/AThere are no such revetments protecting this feature of the segment /system.AToe drainage systems and pressure relief wells necessary for maintaining FDR segment /system stability during high water functioned properly during the last flood event and nosediment is observed in horizontal system (ifapplicable). Nothing is observed which wouldindicate that the drainage systems won'tfunction properly during the next flood, andmaintenance records indicate regular cleaning.Wells have been pumped tested within thepast 5years and documentation isprovided.MToe drainage systems or pressure relief wells are damaged and may become clogged if theyare not repaired. Maintenance records are incomplete or indicate irregular cleaning and pumptesting.UToe drainage systems or pressure relief wells necessary for maintaining FDR segment /system stability during flood events have fallen into disrepair or have become clogged. Nomaintenance records. No documentation of the requiredpumptesting.14.UnderseepageRelief Wells/ ToeDrainage SystemsN/AThere are no relief wells/ toe drainage systems along this component of the FDR segment /system.ANo evidence or historyof unrepaired seepage,saturated areas,or boils.MEvidence or history of minor unrepaired seepage or small saturated areas at or beyond thelandside toe but not on the landward slope of levee. No evidence of soil transport.15.SeepageUEvidence or history of active seepage, extensive saturated areas, or boils.Levee EmbankmentsFor use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of levee segments / systemsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionLevee EmbankmentsPage 5 of 5Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®1If there is significant growth on the levee that inhibits theinspection of animal burrows orother items, the inspection should be ended until this item is corrected.2Detailed survey elevations are normally required during Periodic Inspections, and whenever there are obvious visual settlements.3The decision on whether or not USACE inspectors should enter a pipeto perform a detailed inspection must be made at the USACEDistrict level. This decision should be madein conjunction with the District Safety Office, as pipes may beconsidered confined spaces. Thisdecision should consider theage of the pipe, the diameter of the pipe, the apparentcondition of the pipe, and the length of the pipe. If a pipe isentered for the purposes of inspection, the inspector should record observations with a video camera in order that thecondition of the entire pipe, including all joints, can later be assessed. Additionally, the video record provides a baselineto which future inspections can be compared.FloodwallsFor use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of all floodwallsRated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsAA grass-only or paved zone is maintained onboth sides of the floodwall, free of all trees,brush, and undesirable weeds. The vegetation-free zone extends 15 feet from both the landand riverside of the floodwall, at ground-level, to the centerline of the tree. Additionally, an 8-foot root-free zone is maintained around the entire structure, including the floodwall toe, heel,and any toe-drains. If the floodwall access easement doesn't extend to the described limits,then the vegetation-free zone must be maintained to the easement limits. Reference EM 1110-2-301 and/or Corps policy for regional vegetation variance.MMinimal vegetation growth (brush, weeds, or trees2 inches in diameter or smaller) is presentwithin the zones described above. This vegetation must be removed but does not currentlythreaten the operation or integrity of the floodwall.1.UnwantedVegetationGrowth1USignificant vegetation growth (brush, weeds, or any trees greater than 2 inches in diameter) ispresent within the zones described above. This vegetation threatens the operation or integrityof the floodwall and must be removed.ANo trash, debris, unauthorized structures, excavations, or other obstructions present within theeasement area. Encroachments have been previously reviewed by the Corps, and it wasdetermined that they do not diminish proper functioning of the floodwall.MTrash, debris, unauthorized structures, excavations, or other obstructions present, orinappropriate activities noted that should be corrected but will not inhibit operations andmaintenance or emergency operations. Encroachments have not been reviewed by the Corps.2.EncroachmentsUUnauthorized encroachments or inappropriate activities noted are likely to inhibit operationsand maintenance, emergency operations, or negatively impact the integrity of the floodwall.AClosure structure in good repair. Placing equipment, stoplogs, and other materials are readilyavailable at all times. Components are clearly marked and installation instructions/procedures readily available. Trial erections have been accomplished in accordance with theO&M Manual.UAny of the following issues is cause for this rating: Closure structure in poor condition. Partsmissing or corroded. Placing equipment may notbe available within the anticipated warningtime. The storage vaults cannot be opened during the time of inspection. Components ofclosure are not clearly marked and installation instructions/ procedures are not readilyavailable. Trial erections have not been accomplished in accordance with the O&M Manual.3.Closure Structures(Stop LogClosures andGates)(A or U only)N/AThere are no closure structures alongthis component of the FDR segment /system.ANegligible spalling, scaling or cracking. If the concrete surface is weathered or holdsmoisture, it is still satisfactory but should be seal coated to prevent freeze/ thaw damage.4.Concrete SurfacesMSpalling, scaling, and open cracking present, but the immediateintegrity or performance ofthe structure is not threatened. Reinforcingsteel may be exposed. Repairs/ sealing isnecessary to prevent additional damage during periods of thawing and freezing.Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionFloodwallsPage 1 of 3Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®FloodwallsFor use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of all floodwallsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionFloodwallsPage 2 of 3Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsUSurface deterioration or deep cracks present that may result in an unreliable structure. Anysurface deterioration that exposes the sheet piling or lies adjacent to monolith joints mayindicate underlying reinforcement corrosion and is unacceptable.AThere are no significant areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement that would endanger theintegrity of the structure.MThere are areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement(either active or inactive) that need to berepaired. The maximum offset, either laterally or vertically, does not exceed 2 inches unlessthe movement can be shown to be no longer actively occurring. The integrity of the structureis not in danger.5.Tilting, Sliding orSettlement ofConcreteStructures2UThere are areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement (either active or inactive) that threaten thestructure's integrity and performance. Any movement that has resulted in failure of thewaterstop (possibly identified by daylight visible through the joint) is unacceptable.Differential movement of greater than 2 inchesbetween any two adjacent monoliths, eitherlaterally or vertically, is unacceptable unless it can be shown that the movement is no longeractive. Also, if the floodwall is of I-wall construction, then any visible or measurable tiltingof the wall toward the protected side that hascreated an open horizontal crack on the riversidebase of a monolith is unacceptable.ANo active erosion, scouring, or bank caving that might endanger the structure's stability.MThere are areas where the ground is eroding towardsthe base of the structure. Efforts need tobe taken to slow and repair this erosion, but itis not judged to be close enough to the structureor to be progressing rapidly enough to affect structural stability before the next inspection.For the purposes of inspection, the erosion or scour is not closer to the riverside face of thewall than twice the floodwall's underground basewidth if the wall is of L-wall or T-wallconstruction; or if the wall is of sheetpile or I-wall construction, the erosion is not closer thantwice the wall's visible height. Additionally, rate oferosion is such that the wall is expected toremain stabile until the next inspection.6.Foundation ofConcreteStructures1UErosion or bank caving observed that is closerto the wall than the limitsdescribed above, or isoutside these limits but may leadto structural instabilities before the next inspection.Additionally, if the floodwall is of I-wall or sheetpile construction, the foundation isunacceptable if any turf, soil or pavement material got washed away from the landside of theI-wall as the result of a previous overtopping event.AThe joint material is in good condition. The exterior joint sealant is intact and cracking/desiccation is minimal. Joint filler material and/or waterstop is not visible at any point.7.Monolith JointsMThe joint material has appreciable deterioration to the point where joint filler material and/orwaterstop is visible in some locations. This needs to be repaired or replaced to preventspalling and cracking during freeze/ thaw cycles, and to ensure water tightness of the joint.FloodwallsFor use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of all floodwallsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionFloodwallsPage 3 of 3Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsUThe joint material is severely deteriorated orthe concrete adjacent tothe monolith joints hasspalled and cracked, damaging the waterstop; in either case damage has occurred to the pointwhere it is apparent that the joint is no longer watertight and will not provide the intendedlevel of protection during a flood.N/AThere are no monolith joints in the floodwall.AToe drainage systems and pressure relief wells necessary for maintaining FDR segment /system stability during high water functioned properly during the last flood event and nosediment is observed in horizontal system (ifapplicable). Nothing is observed which wouldindicate that the drainage systems won'tfunction properly during the next flood, andmaintenance records indicate regular cleaning.Wells have been pumped tested within thepast 5 years and documentation is provided.MToe drainage systems or pressure relief wells are damaged and may become clogged if theyare not repaired. Maintenance records are incomplete or indicate irregular cleaning and pumptesting.UToe drainage systems or pressure relief wells necessary for maintaining FDR segment /system stability during flood events have fallen into disrepair or have become clogged. Nomaintenance records. No documentation of the required pump testing.8.UnderseepageRelief Wells/ ToeDrainage SystemsN/AThere are no relief wells/ toe drainage systems along this component of the FDR segment /system.ANo evidence or history of unrepaired seepage, saturated areas, or boils.MEvidence or history of minor unrepaired seepage or small saturated areas at or beyond thelandside toe but not on the landward slope of levee. No evidence of soil transport.9.SeepageUEvidence or history of active seepage, extensive saturated areas, or boils.1Inspectors must have as-built drawings available during the inspection so that the lateral distance to the heel and toe of thefloodwalls can be determined in the field.2The sponsor should be monitoring any observed movement to verify whether the movement is active or inactive.Interior Drainage SystemFor use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of interior drainage systemsRated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsANo obstructions, vegetation, debris, or sedimentaccumulation noted within interior drainagechannels or blocking the culverts, inlets, or discharge areas. Concrete joints and weep holesare free of grass and weeds.MObstructions, vegetation, debris, or sedimentare minor and have not impaired channel flowcapacity or blocked more than 10% of any culvert openings, but should be removed. Alimited volume of grass and weeds may be presentin concrete channel joints and weep holes.1.Vegetation andObstructionsUObstructions, vegetation, debris, or sediment have impaired the channel flow capacity orblocked more than 10% of a culvert opening.Sediment and debris removal required to reestablish flow capacity.ANo trash, debris, unauthorized structures, excavations, or other obstructions present within theeasement area. Encroachments have been previously reviewed by the Corps, and it wasdetermined that they do not diminish properfunctioning of the interior drainage system.MTrash, debris, unauthorized structures, excavations, or other obstructions present, orinappropriate activities noted that should be corrected but will not inhibit operations andmaintenance or emergency operations. Encroachments have not been reviewed by the Corps.2.EncroachmentsUUnauthorized encroachments or inappropriate activities noted are likely to inhibit operationsand maintenance, emergency operations, or negatively impact the integrity of this componentof the interior drainage system.ANo trash, debris, structures, orother obstructions present within the ponding areas. Sedimentdeposits do not exceed 10% of capacity.MTrash, debris, excavations, structures, or otherobstructions present, or inappropriate activitiesthat will not inhibit operations and maintenance. Sediment deposits do not exceed 30% ofcapacity.UTrash, debris, excavations, structures, or other obstructions, or other encroachments oractivities noted that will inhibit operations, maintenance, or emergency work. Sedimentdeposits exceeds 30% of capacity.3.Ponding AreasN/AThere are no ponding areas associatedwith the interior drainage system.AFencing is in good condition and provides protection against falling or unauthorized access.Gates open and close freely, locks are in place, and there is little corrosion on metal parts.MFencing or gates are damaged or corroded but appear to be maintainable. Locks may bemissing or damaged.UFencing and gates are damaged or corroded tothe point that replacement is required, orpotentially dangerous features are not secured.4.Fencing andGates1N/AThere are no features noted that require safety fencing.5.Concrete Surfaces(Such as gateANegligible spalling, scaling or cracking. If the concrete surface is weathered or holdsmoisture, it is still satisfactory but should be seal coated to prevent freeze/ thaw damage.Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionInterior Drainage SystemPage 1 of 5Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Interior Drainage SystemFor use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of interior drainage systemsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionInterior Drainage SystemPage 2 of 5Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsMSpalling, scaling, and open cracking present, but the immediateintegrity or performance ofthe structure is not threatened. Reinforcingsteel may be exposed. Repairs/ sealing isnecessary to prevent additional damage during periods of thawing and freezing.USurface deterioration or deep cracks present that may result in an unreliable structure. Anysurface deterioration that exposes the sheet piling or lies adjacent to monolith joints mayindicate underlying reinforcement corrosion and is unacceptable.wells, outfalls,intakes, orculverts)N/AThere are no concrete items in the interior drainage system.AThere are no significant areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement that would endanger theintegrity of the structure.MThere are areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement(either active or inactive) that need to berepaired. The maximum offset, either laterally or vertically, does not exceed 2 inches unlessthe movement can be shown to be no longer actively occurring. The integrity of the structureis not in danger.UThere are areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement (either active or inactive) that threaten thestructure's integrity and performance. Any movement that has resulted in failure of thewaterstop (possibly identified by daylight visible through the joint) is unacceptable.Differential movement of greater than 2 inchesbetween any two adjacent monoliths, eitherlaterally or vertically, is unacceptable unless it can be shown that the movement is no longeractive. Also, if the floodwall is of I-wall construction, then any visible or measurable tiltingof the wall toward the protected side that hascreated an open horizontal crack on the riversidebase of a monolith is unacceptable.6.Tilting, Sliding orSettlement ofConcrete andSheet PileStructures2(Such as gatewells, outfalls,intakes, orculverts)N/AThere are no concrete items in the interior drainage system.ANo active erosion, scouring, or bank caving that might endanger the structure's stability.MThere are areas where the ground is eroding towardsthe base of the structure. Efforts need tobe taken to slow and repair this erosion, but itis not judged to be close enough to the structureor to be progressing rapidly enough to affect structural stability before the next inspection.The rate of erosion is such that the structure is expected to remain stabile until the nextinspection.UErosion or bank caving observed that may leadto structural instabilities before the nextinspection.7.Foundation ofConcreteStructures3(Such as culverts,inlet anddischargestructures, orgatewells.)N/AThere are no concrete items in the interior drainage system.AThe joint material is in good condition. The exterior joint sealant is intact and cracking/desiccation is minimal. Joint filler material and/or waterstop is not visible at any point.8.Monolith JointsMThe joint material has appreciable deterioration to the point where joint filler material and/orwaterstop is visible in some locations. This needs to be repaired or replaced to preventspalling and cracking during freeze/ thaw cycles, and to ensure water tightness of the joint.Interior Drainage SystemFor use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of interior drainage systemsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionInterior Drainage SystemPage 3 of 5Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsUThe joint material is severely deteriorated orthe concrete adjacent tothe monolith joints hasspalled and cracked, damaging the waterstop; in either case damage has occurred to the pointwhere it is apparent that the joint is no longer watertight and will not provide the intendedlevel of protection during a flood.N/AThere are no monolith joints in the interior drainage system.AThere are no breaks, holes, cracks in the discharge pipes/ culverts that would result insignificant water leakage. The pipe shape is stillessentially circular. All joints appear to beclosed and the soil tight. Corrugated metal pipes, if present, are in good condition with 100%of the original coating still in place (either asphalt or galvanizing) or have been relined withappropriate material, which is still in good condition. Condition of pipes has been verifiedusing television camera video taping or visualinspection methods within the past five years,and the report for every pipe is available for review by the inspector.MThere are a small number of corrosion pinholes or cracks that could leak water and need to berepaired, but the entire length of pipe is still structurally sound and is not in danger ofcollapsing. Pipe shape may be ovalized in some locations but does not appear to beapproaching a curvature reversal. A limited number of joints may have opened and soil lossmay be beginning. Any open joints should be repaired prior to the next inspection.Corrugated metal pipes, if present, may be showing corrosion and pinholes but there are noareas with total section loss. Condition of pipes has been verified using television cameravideo taping or visual inspection methods within the past five years, and the report for everypipe is available for review by the inspector.UCulvert has deterioration and/or has significant leakage; it is in danger of collapsing or asalready begun to collapse. Corrugated metalpipes have suffered 100% section loss in theinvert. HOWEVER: Even if pipes appear to be in good condition, as judged by an externalvisual inspection, an Unacceptable Rating willbe assigned if the condition of pipes has notbeen verified using television camera video taping or visual inspection methods within thepast five years, and reports for all pipes are not available for review by the inspector.9.Culverts/Discharge Pipes4N/AThere are no discharge pipes/ culverts.AGates open and close freely to a tight seal orminor leakage. Gate operators are in goodworking condition and are properly maintained. Sill is free of sediment and otherobstructions. Gates and lifters have been maintained and are free of corrosion.Documentation provided during the inspection.MGates and/or operators have been damaged or have minor corrosion, and open and close withresistance or binding. Leakage quantity is controllable, but maintenance is required. Sill isfree of sediment and other obstructions.UGates do not open or close and/or operators do notfunction. Gate, stem, lifter and/or guidesmay be damaged or have major corrosion.10.Sluice / SlideGates5N/AThere are no sluice/ slide gates.Interior Drainage SystemFor use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of interior drainage systemsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionInterior Drainage SystemPage 4 of 5Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsAGates/ valves open and close easily with minimal leakage, have no corrosion damage, andhave been exercised and lubricated as required.MGates/ valves will not fully open or close because of obstructions that can be easily removed,or have minor corrosion damage that requires maintenance.UGates/ valves are missing, have been damaged, orhave deteriorated to the point that they needto be replaced.11.Flap Gates/Flap Valves/Pinch Valves1N/AThere are no flap gates.ATrash racks are fastened in place and properly maintained.MTrash racks are in place but are unfastened or have bent bars that allow debris to enter into thepipe or pump station, bars are corroded to the point that up to 10% of the sectional area maybe lost. Repair or replacement is required.UTrash racks are missing or damaged to the extent that they are no longer functional and mustbe replaced. (For example, more than10% of the sectional area may be lost.)12.Trash Racks(non-mechanical)N/AThere are no trash racks, or they are covered inthe pump stations section of the report.AAll metal parts are protected from corrosion damage and show no rust, damage, ordeterioration that would cause a safety concern.MCorrosion seen on metallic parts appears to be maintainable.UMetallic parts are severely corroded and require replacement to prevent failure, equipmentdamage, or safety issues.13.Other MetallicItemsN/AThere are no other significant metallic items.ANo riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to theintegrity of channel bank. Riprap intact with no woody vegetation present.MMinor riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to theintegrity of the channel bank. Unwanted vegetation must be cleared or sprayed with anappropriate herbicide.USignificant riprap displacement,exposure of bedding, or stonedegradation observed. Scouractivity is undercutting banks, eroding embankments, or impairing channel flows by causingturbulence or shoaling. Rock protection is hidden by dense brush, trees, or grasses.14.RiprapRevetments ofInlet/ DischargeAreasN/AThere is no riprap protecting this feature of the segment / system, or riprap is discussed inanother section.15.Revetments otherthan RiprapANo riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to theintegrity of channel bank. Riprap intact with no woody vegetation present.Interior Drainage SystemFor use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of interior drainage systemsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionInterior Drainage SystemPage 5 of 5Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsMMinor riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to theintegrity of the channel bank. Unwanted vegetation must be cleared or sprayed with anappropriate herbicide.USignificant riprap displacement,exposure of bedding, or stonedegradation observed. Scouractivity is undercutting banks, eroding embankments, or impairing channel flows by causingturbulence or shoaling. Rock protection is hidden by dense brush, trees, or grasses.N/AThere are no such revetments protectingthis feature of the segment / system.1Proper operation of this item must bedemonstrated during the inspection.2The sponsor should be monitoring any observed movement to verify whether themovement is active or inactive.3Inspectors must have as-built drawings available during the inspection so that the lateral distance to the heel and toe of thefloodwalls can be determined in the field.4The decision on whether or not USACE inspectors should enter a pipeto perform a detailed inspection must be made at the USACEDistrict level. This decision should be madein conjunction with the District Safety Office, as pipes may beconsidered confined spaces. Thisdecision should consider theage of the pipe, the diameter of the pipe, the apparentcondition of the pipe, and the length of the pipe. If a pipe isentered for the purposes of inspection, the inspector should record observations with a video camera in order that thecondition of the entire pipe, including all joints, can later be assessed. Additionally, the video record provides a baselineto which future inspections can be compared.5Proper operation of the gates (full open and closed) must be demonstrated during the inspection if no documentation is available. Be aware of both manual and electricaloperators.Pump StationsFor use during Initial and ContinuingEligibility Inspections of pump stationsRated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsAOperation, maintenance and inspection recordsare present at the pump station and are beingused and updated, and personnel have been trained in pump station operations. Names and lasttraining date shown in the record book.MOperation, maintenance and inspection records are present but not adequately used andupdated.1.Pump StationsOperating,Maintenance,Training, &InspectionRecordsUNo operation, maintenance and inspection records are present, or refresher training forpersonnel has not been conducted.AOperation and Maintenance Equipment Manualsand/or posted operating instructions arepresent and updated as required, and adequatelycover all pertinent pump station features.O&M manuals include points of contact for manufacturers and suppliers of major equipmentused in the facility.MOperation and Maintenance Equipment Manualsand/or posted operating instructions arepresent and adequately cover all pertinent pump station features. However, they areincomplete and the necessary updates have not been made.2.Pump StationOperations andMaintenanceEquipmentManualsUOperation and Maintenance Equipment Manuals are not available.ASafety compliance inspection reports by applicablelocal, state, or federal agencies availablefor review.3.SafetyComplianceMNo safety compliance inspection reports are available for review.AA telephone, cellular phone, two-way radio, orsimilar device is available to pump stationoperator and maintenance personnel.4.Communications(A or M only)MA telephone, cellular phone, two-way radio, or similar device is not available to pump stationoperator and maintenance personnel.AThe building is in good structural condition with no major foundation settlement problems.The roof is not leaking, intake & exhaust louversare clear of debris, fans are operational, etc.MThere are minor structural defects, minimal foundation settlement, leaks, or other conditionsnoted that need repair. Defects do not threatenthe structural integrity or stability of thebuilding, and will not impact pumping operations.5.Plant BuildingUThe structural integrity or stability of the building is threatened, or there is damage to thebuilding that threatens safety of the operator or impacts pumping operations.AFencing is in good condition and provides protection against falling or unauthorized access.Gates open and close freely, locks are in place, and there is little corrosion on metal parts.MFencing or gates are damaged or corroded but appear to be maintainable. Locks may bemissing or damaged.6.Fencing andGates1UFencing and gates are damaged or corroded tothe point that replacement is required, orpotentially dangerous features are not secured.Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionPump StationsPage 1 of 5Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Pump StationsFor use during Initial and ContinuingEligibility Inspections of pump stationsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionPump StationsPage 2 of 5Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsN/AThere are no features noted that require safety fencing.AAll pumps are properly maintained and lubricated. Systems are periodically tested anddocumented for review. No vibration, cavitation noises or unusual sounds are noted when thepump is operated. Bearing temperature sensor records don't indicate any problems.MMinor deficiencies noted that need to be closely monitored or repaired, such as the presence ofslight vibrations, leakage of packing gland, bearing temperature sensors are inoperable or norecord is present. However, the pumps areoperational and are expected to perform throughthe next period of usage.7.Pumps1UMajor deficiencies identified that may significantly reduce pumping operations. For example,bearing sensor records indicate problems, excessive vibration noted, impellers are badlycorroded, or there are eroded or missing blades.AAll items are operational. Preventative maintenance and lubrication is being performed andthe system is periodically subjected to performance testing. Instrumentation, alarms, bearingsensors and auto shutdowns are operational.MSystems have minor deficiencies, but are operational and will function adequately through thenext flood. Bearing sensors are not operational.8.Motors, Engines,Fans, GearReducers, BackStop Devices, etc.UOne or more of the primary motors or systemsis not operational, or noted deficiencies havenot been corrected.AClear of debris, sediment, or other obstructions. Procedures are in place to remove debrisaccumulation during operation.MDebris, sediment, or other obstructions may bepresent and must be removed, but the sump/wet well will function as intended during the next flood. Procedures are in place to removedebris accumulation during operation.9.Sumps / Wet wellULarge debris or excessive silt present which willhinder or damage pumps during operation, orno procedures established to remove debris accumulation during operation.ADrive chain, bearing, gear reducers, and other components are in good operating condition andare being properly maintained.MThe trash rake is in need of maintenance, but is still operational.UTrash rake not operational or deficiencies will inhibit operationsduring the next flood event.10.MechanicalOperating TrashRakes1N/AThere are no mechanical trash rakes.ATrash racks are fastened in place and properly maintained.11.Non-MechanicalTrash RacksMTrash racks are in place but are unfastened or have bent bars that allow debris to enter into thepipe or pump station, bars are corroded to the point that up to 10% of the sectional area maybe lost. Repair or replacement is required.Pump StationsFor use during Initial and ContinuingEligibility Inspections of pump stationsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionPump StationsPage 3 of 5Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsUTrash racks are missing or damaged to the extent that they are no longer functional and mustbe replaced. (For example, more than10% of the sectional area may be lost.)N/AThere are no trash racks, or they are covered inthe pump stations section of the report.AFuel system is operational, day tank present and operational, fuel fresh and rotated regularly.MFuel system is operational and of adequate capacity, but day tank is missing or fuel is not freshand rotated regularly.UFuel system not functional.12.Fuel System forPump EnginesN/ANo fuel system.AThe normal power source and backup generators, if installed, are operational, properlyexercised and well maintained. Surge protection, grounding,lightning protection,transformers, and automatic/manual transfer of main power to backup system is working.MNormal power source and backup units, if applicable, are operational with minor discrepanciesor maintenance, inspection and exercising recordis present but not up to date. Preventativemaintenance or repairs are required.13.Power SourceUNormal power source or generators are not operational and must be repaired; or generator, ifrequired, is not on site.AOperational and maintained free of damage, corrosion, and debris. Preventative maintenanceand system testing is being performed periodically.MOperational with minor discrepancies. Preventative maintenance or repairs are required, butthe components are expected to function adequately during the next flood event.14.ElectricalSystems2UComponents of the electrical system will not function adequately during the next flood eventand must be replaced.AResults of megger tests on pump motors or critical power cables show that the insulationmeets manufacturer's or industry standards.Tested within the last year.MMegger testing not conducted within the past year. If megger tests on pump motors indicatethat insulation resistance is below the manufacturer's or industry standard, but the resistancecan be corrected with proper application of heat, this is minimally acceptable. (Theapplication of heat does not relate to critical power cables.)15.Megger Testingon Pump Motorsand Critical PowerCablesUMegger tests not conducted within past two years,or tests indicate that insulation resistance islow enough that the equipment will not be able to meet design standards of operation; orevidence of arcing or shorting is detected visually.Pump StationsFor use during Initial and ContinuingEligibility Inspections of pump stationsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionPump StationsPage 4 of 5Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsAAll enclosures, panels, conduits, and ducts are protected from corrosion damage and show norust, damage, or deterioration that would cause a safety concern.MMinor surface corrosion which appears to be maintainable. Cleaning and painting required.16.Enclosures,Panels, Conduitand DuctsUSeverely corroded and must be replaced to prevent failure, equipment damage, or safetyissues.AIntake and discharge pipelines have no corrosion and paint is intact, except for minor touch uprequired. Pipe couplings and anchors have no leakage or corrosion.MIntake and discharge pipelines have minor corrosion and repair and painting is required. Pipecoupling with anchors have minor leakage, corrosion and require bolts to be tightened.17.Intake andDischargePipelinesUIntake and discharge pipelines have major corrosion and replacement is required. Pipecoupling with anchors have major leakage and is heavily corroded and requires replacement.AGates open and close freely to a tight seal orminor leakage. Gate operators are in goodworking condition and are properly maintained. Sill is free of sediment and otherobstructions. Gates and lifters have been maintained and are free of corrosion.Documentation provided during the inspection.MGates and/or operators have been damaged or have minor corrosion, and open and close withresistance or binding. Leakage quantity is controllable, but maintenance is required. Sill isfree of sediment and other obstructions.UGates do not open or close and/or operators do notfunction. Gate, stem, lifter and/or guidesmay be damaged or have major corrosion.18.Sluice/ SlideGates3N/AThere are no sluice/ slide gates.AGates/ valves open and close easily with minimal leakage, have no corrosion damage, andhave been exercised and lubricated as required.MGates/ valves will not fully open or close because of obstructions that can be easily removed,or have minor corrosion damage that requires maintenance.UGates/ valves are missing, have been damaged, orhave deteriorated to the point that they needto be replaced.19.Flap Gates/Flap Valves/Pinch Valves1N/AThere are no gates on discharge lines from pump station.20.Cranes1ACranes operational and have been inspected and load tested in accordance with applicablestandards within the last year. Documentation is on hand.Pump StationsFor use during Initial and ContinuingEligibility Inspections of pump stationsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionPump StationsPage 5 of 5Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsMCranes have not been inspected or operationally tested within the past year, or there are visiblesigns of corrosion, oil leakage,etc, requiring maintenance.UCranes are not operational, and this mayprevent the pump station from functioning asrequired. No documentation available on cranes.N/AThere are no cranes.AAll metal parts are protected from corrosion damage and show no rust, damage, ordeterioration that would cause a safety concern.MCorrosion seen on metallic parts appears to be maintainable.UMetallic parts are severely corroded and require replacement to prevent failure, equipmentdamage, or safety issues.21.Other MetallicItems(Equipment,Ladders, PlatformAnchors, etc)N/AThere are no other significant metallic items.1Proper operation of this item must bedemonstrated during the inspection.2Check motor control center, circuit breakers, pilot lights, volt meters, ammeters, sump level indicator, gate position indicators, remote operating systems, including SCADA andtelemetry systems. Also, check interior and exterior lighting; especially lighting near trash rack screens, ladders, walkways,etc.3Proper operation of the gates (full open and closed) must bedemonstrated during the inspection if no documentation is available. Be aware of both manual and electricaloperators.Flood Damage Reduction ChannelsFor use during Initial and Continuing EligibilityInspections of flood damage reduction channelsRated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsANo obstructions, vegetation, debris, or sedimentaccumulation within the channel. Concretechannel joints and weep holes are free of grass and weeds.MObstructions (including log jams), vegetation, debris, or sediment are minor and have notimpaired channel flow capacity, but should be removed. Sediment shoals have not developedto the extent that they can support vegetation other than non-aquatic grasses. A limitedvolume of grass and weeds may be present in concrete channel joints and weep holes.1.Vegetation andObstructionsUObstructions (including log jams), vegetation, debris or sediment have impaired the channelflow capacity. Sediment shoals are well established and support woody and/or brushyvegetation. Sediment and debris removal required to re-establish flow capacity.ANo shoaling or minor, non-vegetated shoaling is present.MMore widespread vegetated and non-vegetated shoaling is present. Non-aquatic grasses arepresent on shoal. No trees or brush is presenton shoal, and channel flow is not significantlyreduced. Sediment and debris removal recommended.2.Shoaling1(sedimentdeposition)UShoaling is well established, stabilized by saplings, brush, or other vegetation. Shoals arediverting flow to channel walls. Channel flow capacity is reduced and maintenance isrequired.ANo trash, debris, unauthorized structures, excavations, or other obstructions present within theeasement area. Encroachments have been previously reviewed by the Corps, and it wasdetermined that they do not diminish proper functioning of the channel.MTrash, debris, unauthorized structures, excavations, or other obstructions present, orinappropriate activities noted that should be corrected but will not inhibit operations andmaintenance or emergency operations. Encroachments have not been reviewed by the Corps.3.EncroachmentsUUnauthorized encroachments or inappropriate activities noted are likely to inhibit operationsand maintenance, emergency operations, or negatively impact the integrity of the channel.ANo head cutting or horizontal deviation observed.MHead cutting and horizontal deviation evident, butis less than 1 foot from the designed gradeor cross section.4.ErosionUHead cutting and horizontal deviation of morethan 1 foot from the designed grade or crosssection. Corrective actions required to stop or slow erosion.ANegligible spalling, scaling or cracking. If the concrete surface is weathered or holdsmoisture, it is still satisfactory but should be seal coated to prevent freeze/ thaw damage.5.Concrete SurfacesMSpalling, scaling, and open cracking present, but the immediateintegrity or performance ofthe structure is not threatened. Reinforcingsteel may be exposed. Repairs/ sealing isnecessary to prevent additional damage during periods of thawing and freezing.Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionFlood Damage Reduction ChannelsPage 1 of 4Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Flood Damage Reduction ChannelsFor use during Initial and Continuing EligibilityInspections of flood damage reduction channelsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionFlood Damage Reduction ChannelsPage 2 of 4Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsUSurface deterioration or deep cracks present that may result in an unreliable structure. Anysurface deterioration that exposes the sheet piling or lies adjacent to monolith joints mayindicate underlying reinforcement corrosion and is unacceptable.N/AThere are no concrete items in the channel.AThere are no significant areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement that would endanger theintegrity of the structure.MThere are areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement(either active or inactive) that need to berepaired. The maximum offset, either laterally or vertically, does not exceed 2 inches unlessthe movement can be shown to be no longer actively occurring. The integrity of the structureis not in danger.UThere are areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement (either active or inactive) that threaten thestructure's integrity and performance. Any movement that has resulted in failure of thewaterstop (possibly identified by daylight visible through the joint) is unacceptable.Differential movement of greater than 2 inchesbetween any two adjacent monoliths, eitherlaterally or vertically, is unacceptable unless it can be shown that the movement is no longeractive. Also, if the floodwall is of I-wall construction, then any visible or measurable tiltingof the wall toward the protected side that hascreated an open horizontal crack on the riversidebase of a monolith is unacceptable.6.Tilting, Sliding orSettlement ofConcreteStructures2N/AThere are no concrete items in the channel.ANo active erosion, scouring, or bank caving that might endanger the structure's stability.MThere are areas where the ground is eroding towardsthe base of the structure. Efforts need tobe taken to slow and repair this erosion, but itis not judged to be close enough to the structureor to be progressing rapidly enough to affect structural stability before the next inspection.For the purposes of inspection, the erosion or scour is not closer to the riverside face of thewall than twice the floodwall's underground basewidth if the wall is of L-wall or T-wallconstruction; or if the wall is of sheetpile or I-wall construction, the erosion is not closer thantwice the wall's visible height. Additionally, rate oferosion is such that the wall is expected toremain stabile until the next inspection.UErosion or bank caving observed that is closerto the wall than the limitsdescribed above, or isoutside these limits but may leadto structural instabilities before the next inspection.Additionally, if the floodwall is of I-wall or sheetpile construction, the foundation isunacceptable if any turf, soil or pavement material got washed away from the landside of theI-wall as the result of a previous overtopping event.7.Foundation ofConcreteStructures3N/AThere are no concrete items in the channel.8.Slab and MonolithJointsAThe joint material is in good condition. The exterior joint sealant is intact and cracking/desiccation is minimal. Joint filler material and/or waterstop is not visible at any point.Flood Damage Reduction ChannelsFor use during Initial and Continuing EligibilityInspections of flood damage reduction channelsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionFlood Damage Reduction ChannelsPage 3 of 4Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Rated ItemRatingRating GuidelinesLocation/Remarks/RecommendationsMThe joint material has appreciable deterioration to the point where joint filler material and/orwaterstop is visible in some locations. This needs to be repaired or replaced to preventspalling and cracking during freeze/ thaw cycles, and to ensure water tightness of the joint.UThe joint material is severely deteriorated orthe concrete adjacent tothe monolith joints hasspalled and cracked, damaging the waterstop; in either case damage has occurred to the pointwhere it is apparent that the joint is no longer watertight and will not provide the intendedlevel of protection during a flood.N/AThere are no concrete items in the channel.AGates/ valves open and close easily with minimal leakage, have no corrosion damage, andhave been exercised and lubricated as required.MGates/ valves will not fully open or close because of obstructions that can be easily removed,or have minor corrosion damage that requires maintenance.UGates/ valves are missing, have been damaged, orhave deteriorated to the point that they needto be replaced.9.Flap Gates/Flap Valves/Pinch Valves4N/AThere are no flap gates.ANo riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to theintegrity of channel bank. Riprap intact with no woody vegetation present.MMinor riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to theintegrity of the channel bank. Unwanted vegetation must be cleared or sprayed with anappropriate herbicide.USignificant riprap displacement,exposure of bedding, or stonedegradation observed. Scouractivity is undercutting banks, eroding embankments, or impairing channel flows by causingturbulence or shoaling. Rock protection is hidden by dense brush, trees, or grasses.10.RiprapRevetments &BanksN/AThere is no riprap protecting this feature of the segment / system, or riprap is discussed inanother section.AExisting revetment protection is properly maintained, undamaged, and clearly visible.MMinor revetment displacement or deterioration that does not pose an immediate threat to theintegrity of the levee. Unwanted vegetation must be cleared or sprayed with an appropriateherbicide.USignificant revetment displacement, deterioration, or exposure of bedding observed. Scouractivity is undercutting banks, eroding embankments, or impairing channel flows by causingturbulence or shoaling. Revetment protection is hidden by dense brush and trees.11.Revetments otherthan RiprapN/AThere are no such revetments protectingthis feature of the segment / system.Flood Damage Reduction ChannelsFor use during Initial and Continuing EligibilityInspections of flood damage reduction channelsKey: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Flood Damage ReductionFlood Damage Reduction ChannelsPage 4 of 4Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®1If weather and flow conditions allow, inspectors should walk in the channel and probeshoal areas in order to estimate extentof blockage of the cross-sectional area whereshoaling is present.2The sponsor should be monitoring any observed movement to verify whether the movement is active or inactive.3Inspectors must have as-built drawings available during the inspection so that the lateral distance to the heel and toe of thefloodwalls can be determined in the field.4Proper operation of this item must bedemonstrated during the inspection.Supplemental Data SheetPage 1 of 1Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemInspection ReportUS Army Corpsof Engineers®Flood Damage Reduction Segment / SystemSupplemental Data SheetThis form is intended for the Corps' internal useand may not need to be updated with every inspection.Name of Segment /System:Sponsor:Location:River Basin:Project Description:Authority that Project was Constructed Under:Date of Construction:Approximate Annual Maintenance Costs:Construction:Federally ConstructedNon-Federally ConstructedMaintenance:Federally MaintainedNon-Federally MaintainedNational Flood Insurance Program:a.Is the project currently NFIP?YesNob.If in the NFIP, Date of Certification (per 44 CFR 65.10):Datum Information:a.Datum used for the design and construction of this project is:b.Current recommended datum for this project is:c.Has the Project been converted to the current recommended datum?YesNoLevee Embankment Data:Protected Features (For use in preparing estimates and PIRs):a.Levee Designed Gage Function Reading/Station:a.Total acres protected:b.Level of Protection Provided:b.Total agriculture production acres protected:c.Average Height of Levee:c.Towns:d.Average Crown Width:d.Businesses:e.Average Side Slope:e.Residences:f.Roads:g.Utilities:h.Barns:i.Machine Sheds:j.Outbuildings:k.Irrigation Systems:l.Grain Bins:m.Other Facilities:

# C

- 1

Enclosure 3: Subset of I nspection I tems for Rehabilitation Program Eligibility

Determination

In order to be eligible, all of the following items must be rated A, M, N/A or Yes.

Note: Item numbers listed below refer to their placement in the Inspection Checklist

(Enclosure 2).

Rehabilitation Progra m Eligibility Determination

Yes Public sponsor provided maintenance information per the Public Sponsor Pre

Inspection Form

. No

Yes

Non

- federal levee system meets Initial Eligibility criteria. No

N/A

If either of the above items is marked “No” the levee system is not eligible.

Rating Rated Item

Levee Embankments

A

M

U 3. Encroachments

A

U

N/A 4. Closure Structures (Stop Log, Earthen Closures, Gates, or Sandbag

Closures)

A

M

U 5. Slope Stability

A

M

U 6. Erosion/ Bank Caving

A

M

U 10. Animal Control

A

M

U

N/A 11. Culverts/Discharge Pipes (This item includes both concrete and corrugated

metal pipes

. )

A

M

U

N/A 14. Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe Drainage Systems

Floodwalls

A

M

U 2. Encroachments

A

U

N/A 3. Closure Structures (Stop Log Closures and Gates)

A

M

U 5. Tilting, Sliding, or Settlement of Concrete Structures

# C

- 2

A

M

U 6. Foundation of Concrete Structures

A

M

U

N/A 8. Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe Drainage Systems

Interior Drainage System

A

M

U

N/A 9. Culverts/Discharge Pipes

A

M

U

N/A 10. Sluice/Slide Gates

A

M

U

N/A 11. Flap Gates/Flap Valves/Pinch Valves

Pump Stations

A

M

U 17. Intake and Discharge Pipelines

A

M

U

N/A 18. Sluice/Slide Gates

A

M

U

N/A 19. Flap Gates/Flap Valves/Pinch Valves

Rehabilitation Program Status

Active System meets all interim eligibility criteria, including having received a

rating of A, M, N/A or Yes for all subset items and is therefore eligible for

rehabilitation assistance.

Inactive System does not meet interim eligibility requirements.

Comments: