alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James Tarrity and Louise Tarrity, his wife, Plaintiffs, *v.*Pittston Area School District and State Public School Building Authority, Defendants.

Argued March 4, 1975,

before President Judge Bowman and Judges Crumlish, Jr., Kramer, Wilkinson, Jr., Mencer, Rogers and Blatt.

*Lewis W. Wetzel,*with him *John C. Eiehorn*and *Joseph J. Musto,*for plaintiffs.

*J. Earl Langan,*with him *James R. Clippinger,*for defendants.

March 27, 1975:

Per Curiam,

The plaintiffs in this equity suit complained of the obstruction placed by the defendants across a roadway, the right to the use of which the plaintiffs claim by prescriptive right. After trial, the chancellor concluded that the plaintiffs had acquired an easement to use the roadway, which the defendants had unlawfully obstructed and by decree nisi made November 15, 1974, directed the defendants to remove the obstruction, to provide a practical roadway for the plaintiffs’ use and restrained future interference with the plaintiffs’ easement.

*176The defendants have filed exceptions of a general nature to the operative findings and conclusions of the chancellor’s adjudication which are now before us after argument.

The essential finding was that the plaintiffs, the owners of a residential premises at 66 Reynolds Street, Borough of Hughestown, Luzerne County since April 1947, did after that date continuously, openly, notoriously, adversely, and under a claim of right, use an extension of Reynolds Street as access to a road leading to the City of Pittston and that this use continued until the extension was obstructed by the defendants in November, 1971. The evidence supporting the plaintiffs’ use of Reynolds Street extension during the period mentioned was not seriously contested. The defendants’ principal defense was that the plaintiffs’ use was with the permission of the defendants’ predecessors in ownership of the land over which the extension passed, until obstructed by the defendants. The chancellor found, based on testimony of a prior owner that, while the plaintiffs’ use was not objected to, it was not permissive.

The defendants, as mentioned, except generally to these central findings and additionally to findings concerning events long antedating the plaintiffs’ acquisition of their residence on Reynolds Street. A review of the record on these exceptions demonstrates that all of the findings excepted to are supported by the evidence. The conclusions excepted to follow from the findings.

We therefore enter the following:

Final Order

And now, this 27th day of March, 1975, it is ordered that all of the defendants’ exceptions to the findings, conclusions and decree nisi be and they are dismissed, and that the Prothonotary be and he hereby is directed to enter the decree nisi of November 5,1974 as a final decree in this suit.
From: Baldyga, Lyndsey [LBaldyga@tecoenergy.com]

Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 3:01 PM

To: Hofmeister, Art

Cc: Burrows, Byron T.; Lukcic, David M.

Subject: CO2e Emission Limit

Art,

In order to maintain the current project schedule, TEC agrees to leave the limit as proposed in the 

permit application including startup and shutdown. Please let me know if there are any questions.

Thank you,

Lyndsey Baldyga

Environmental Health & Safety

Air Programs: Engineer I

Phone: 813-228-4740

Ext. 34740

Mobile: 813-309-0376

Lbaldyga@tecoenergy.com

NOTICE: This email is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have 

received this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately, delete this email from your system and do not copy or disclose it to 

anyone else. Although we take precautions to protect against viruses, we advise you to take your own precautions to protect against viruses 

as we accept no liability for any which remain.
# Region 6 | Heartland

The Heartland Region is the center of the continental United States. We proudly serve our customers and citizens in Iowa, Kansas, Missouri and Nebraska.

# Region 6 | Heartland

The Heartland Region is the center of the continental United States. We proudly serve our customers and citizens in Iowa, Kansas, Missouri and Nebraska.

##                     Dwayne Huffman and team tackle the NFL Draft’s impact in Kansas City            

          GSA Region 6 Zonal Branch Chief and Regional Emergency Coordinator Dwayne Huffman     

##                     Terrance Cowley named PBS acquisition director            

          He replaces David Rumsey, who was previously promoted to Deputy Regional Commissioner.    

                    Buildings & Facilities                                      - Iowa
                          - Kansas
                          - Missouri
                          - Nebraska
                          - Art in Architecture Program
                          - Historic Preservation Program
                          - Real Estate Services

                    Products & Services            
Region 6 is home to GSA's Heartland Acquisition Center -- the federal government's hardware superstore. When it comes to tools and facilities management, we've got you covered:
                          - Assisted Acquisition Services
                          - National Customer Service Center
                          - Heartland Acquisition Center
                          - How to get on a MAS Contract

                    About Region 6                                      - Events
                          - Jobs
                          - Key Contacts

                    Small Business Opportunities            
  We are advocates for small, small disadvantaged, veteran, service-disabled veteran-owned, HUBZone, and women business owners.

                    Region 6 Newsroom                                      - Feature Stories
                          - News Releases
                          - Social and Other Media

                    Other Services            
Whatever your need, GSA can fulfill it. We've highlighted a few offerings:
                          - Emergency Management
                          - Telecommunications and Network Services
                          - Vehicles and Fleet Service

Print PageEmail Page

Top
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION





The
      undersigned, Thomas C. Shields, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer of ANADIGICS, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Annual
      Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





Dated:
      February 27, 2007


By:
            /s/
                Thomas C. ShieldsThomas
                C. ShieldsExecutive
                Vice President and
                Chief Financial Officer







This
      certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated
      by
      reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of
      1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
      by reference.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to ANADIGICS, Inc. and will be retained by
      ANADIGICS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.
263 La. 371

#### Bennie J. HUDGENS et ux. v. John H. GUNN et al.

No. 52946.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 16, 1972.

In re: Bennie J. Hudgens and Geneva Julius Hudgens applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 267 So.2d 771.

Application denied. The ruling of the Court of Appeal is correct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  320,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,600
<INVENTORY>                                     20,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               329,400
<PP&E>                                       4,588,200
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,872,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,249,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          414,100
<BONDS>                                        796,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        400
<COMMON>                                       525,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     181,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,249,900
<SALES>                                        813,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               813,400
<CGS>                                          247,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  519,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                260,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                   101,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            158,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   158,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EX-10.8





 Exhibit 10.8 

December 5, 2012 
 Daniel J. Starck 

[Redacted] 
  

	 	Re:	 Amendment of Executive Employment Agreement 



Dear Dan: 
 This letter confirms the amendment,
as set forth below, of your Executive Employment Agreement, dated 3/14/2012, with Apria Healthcare Group Inc. (the “Severance Agreement”). 

In the event that you become entitled to severance pay pursuant to Section 4(a) of the Severance Agreement and the timing of your
delivery of the release of claims (as contemplated by Sections 4(a)and 4(d) of the Severance Agreement) could cause the severance pay installments to commence in either of two calendar years, such installments shall commence in the second of those
two years but shall otherwise be paid in accordance with the Severance Agreement. 
 Except as expressly provided in the preceding
paragraph, your Severance Agreement continues in effect in accordance with its terms. This letter shall be construed and interpreted consistent with Section 11(a) of the Severance Agreement. 

 

	
	Apria Healthcare Group Inc.
	
	/s/ Robert S. Holcombe
	By: Robert S. Holcombe
	Title: EVP, General Counsel & Secretary


  

	
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
	
	/s/ Daniel J. Starck
	Daniel J. Starck
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 843 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 144

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 843

                          [Report No. 103-100]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To withdraw certain lands located in the Coronado National Forest from 
the mining and mineral leasing laws of the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                July 20 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

                       Reported without amendment

                                                       Calendar No. 144
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                               H. R. 843

                          [Report No. 103-100]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 13 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                July 20 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

              Reported by Mr. Johnston, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To withdraw certain lands located in the Coronado National Forest from 
the mining and mineral leasing laws of the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cave Creek Canyon Protection Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF LANDS WITHIN CAVE CREEK CANYON DRAINAGE.

    (a) Withdrawal.--Subject to valid existing rights, after the date 
of enactment of this Act lands within the Cave Creek Canyon Drainage 
are withdrawn from entry, location, or patent under the general mining 
laws, the operation of the mineral and geothermal leasing laws and the 
mineral material disposal laws.
    (b) Definition.--For the purposes of this Act, the term ``Cave 
Creek Canyon Drainage'' means lands and interest in lands owned by the 
United States within the area depicted on the map of record entitled 
``Cave Creek Mineral Withdrawal'', dated November 1, 1991. The map 
shall be on file and available for public inspection in the offices of 
the Forest Service, Department of Agriculture.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 11, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Hollis *v.*Moore.

No judgment can be rendered for the plaintiff when there is a good plea in the case unanswered.

*Appeal from Crawford Circuit Court.*.

H011. Thomas Boles, Circuit Judge.

Jesse Turner, for plaintiff in error.

William Walker, contra.

Clendenin, J.

The appellee commenced his action of trespass *vi et armis*in the circuit.court. The defendant, after service had, appeared and filed three pleas of not guilty, a special plea of justification, and the statute of limitation. The cause was submitted to a jury, and a verdict rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant moved for a new trial, and, upon his motion being overruled, he tendered his bill of exceptions, and appealed.

Upon examining the transcript of the record in this case, we find that there were no issues made up, or tendered to the pleas of the defendant. The pleas, therefore, stood unanswered, and it is certainly a clear proposition that a plaintiff would not be entitled to judgment when there is a good plea in the case unanswered ; and this has been the uniform ruling of this court. *Williams, et al., v.*Perkins, *21*Ark., *18; Reagan v.*Irvin, *decided at this term.*

As the record is now before us, we do not feel authorized to decide upon the other points assigned for error. For the error indicated, the ease must be reversed, and remanded to the circuit court, with directions to that court to grant the defendant a new trial, and to permit the parties to perfect their pleadings.
# C_2021044EN.01005901.xml

| 8.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/59

---

Action brought on 16 December 2020 — Freundlieb v EUIPO (CRYSTAL)

(Case T-732/20)

(2021/C 44/81)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Andreas Freundlieb (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: J. Vogtmeier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark CRYSTAL — EU trade mark No 8 372 591

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 October 2020 in Case R 1056/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and order that his rights in EU trade mark No 8 372 591 be re-established in accordance with his application; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and order that his rights in EU trade mark No 8 372 591 be re-established in accordance with his application;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 104(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 104(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
(Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I,  R.  Llee  Chapman,  Chief  Financial Officer of Apollo Gold Corporation (the
"Company"),  do  hereby  certify  in  accordance  with  U.S. C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.  The  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003,
     as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
     (the  "Periodic  Report"),  fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  March 30, 2004


                                /s/  R.  Llee  Chapman
                                ----------------------
                                R. LLEE CHAPMAN
                                CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 329 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 329

Designating 1994 as a year to honor the memory and leadership qualities 
 of the Honorable Thomas P. ``Tip'' O'Neill, Jr., the late Speaker of 
                     the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 1994

Mr. Rose submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating 1994 as a year to honor the memory and leadership qualities 
 of the Honorable Thomas P. ``Tip'' O'Neill, Jr., the late Speaker of 
                     the House of Representatives.

Whereas the death of the late Speaker of the House of Representatives, Thomas P. 
        ``Tip'' O'Neill, Jr., on January 5, 1994, has created not only a 
        personal loss to his many friends and colleagues, but also a great loss 
        to the Nation;
Whereas Speaker O'Neill, is remembered by all for his dedication to good 
        government and his love for the people of the United States;
Whereas Speaker O'Neill's compassion and goodness of heart and his spirit of 
        cooperation and conciliation were evident to all who knew him;
Whereas in the House of Representatives and in his life, Speaker O'Neill's 
        personal charm and political skill transcended differences of 
        personality and party;
Whereas Speaker O'Neill presided over the House of Representatives from the 
        Ninety-fifth Congress through the Ninety-ninth Congress and emerged as 
        one of the greatest American political leaders of this century; and
Whereas it is appropriate that the House of Representatives rededicate itself to 
        the principles of leadership personified by Speaker O'Neill: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That 1994 is designated as a year to honor the memory and 
leadership qualities of the Honorable Thomas P. ``Tip'' O'Neill, Jr., 
the late Speaker of the House of Representatives.
    Sec. 2. There shall be available from the contingent fund of the 
House of Representatives such sums as may be necessary to carry out 
this resolution.
    Sec. 3. The Committee on House Administration of the House of 
Representatives shall have authority to prescribe regulations to carry 
out this resolution.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Parent

Coastal Financial Corporation

Subsidiary                                     Percentage       State of
----------                                     ----------       --------
                                               Owned            Incorporation
                                               -----            -------------

Coastal Federal Savings Bank                   100%             United States

Coastal Federal Mortgage, Inc.                 100%             South Carolina

Coastal Investor Services, Inc.                100%             South Carolina

Coastal Technology Solutions                   100%             South Carolina

Coastal Federal Holding Corporation            100%             Delaware

Coastal Real Estate Investment                 100%             North Carolina
  Corporation (3)

Coastal Mortgage Bankers and                   100%             South Carolina
  Realty Co., Inc. (1)

Shady Forest Development                       100%             South Carolina
  Corporation (2)

Sherwood Development                           100%             South Carolina
  Corporation (2)

Ridge Development Corporation (2)              100%             South Carolina

501 Development Corporation (2)                100%             South Carolina

North Beach Investment, Inc. (2)               100%             South Carolina

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1)  First tier subsidiaries of Coastal Federal.
(2)  Second tier  subsidiaries of Coastal Federal and first tier subsidiaries of
     Coastal Mortgage.
(3)  First tier operating  subsidiary of Coastal  Federal  Holding  Corporation,
     consolidated with Coastal Federal for Regulatory Reporting.


                                       56
#### Grace G. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Adolphus LEWIS, Appellee.

No. O-287.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 24, 1971.

Truett & Watkins, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Lawrence Renfroe, Tallahassee, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having *703failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Adler v. Segal, 108 So.2d 773 (Fla.App.1969).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, J J., concur.