alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Monte E. Taylor, Jr., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of GeneLink, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)for the registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];     c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 

 
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls.        Date: October 15, 2007 By:  /s/ Monte E. Taylor, Jr.    Monte E. Taylor, Jr.,     Chief Executive Officer and
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 242 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 242

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives respecting waivers 
                               of rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 5, 1993

  Mr. Buyer (for himself, Mr. Fawell, Mr. Livingston, Mr. Quinn, Mr. 
  Istook, Mr. Huffington, Mr. Horn, Mr. Everett, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. 
   Greenwood, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Portman, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
  Calvert, Mr. Grams, Mr. Torkildsen, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. McInnis, Mr. 
Miller of Florida, Mr. Inglis of South Carolina, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. 
 McKeon, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. 
Boehlert, Mr. Solomon, Mr. Doolittle, Mrs. Meyers of Kansas, Mr. Goss, 
Mr. Zimmer, Mrs. Fowler, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Linder, Mr. Petri, Mr. McHugh, 
  Mr. Herger, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Ravenel, Mr. 
 Ramstad, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. Quillen, Mr. Bachus of Alabama, Mr. Canady, 
 Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, and Mr. Talent) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives respecting waivers 
                               of rules.

    Resolved, That clause 4 of rule XI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(e) The affirmative percentage of those voting that is required 
to adopt any rule or order reported by the Committee on Rules providing 
for the consideration of any bill or resolution that waives any rule of 
the House shall be the same as the affirmative percentage of those 
voting that is required by the rules of the House to waive that 
rule.''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         119,967                 335,552
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  593,220                 302,475
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    889,500                 500,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,750,208               1,179,011
<PP&E>                                         303,462                 212,225
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,671                  45,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,083,717               1,384,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          921,993                 825,653
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     1,103,547                 716,600
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,083,717               1,384,194
<SALES>                                      3,000,406               2,929,284
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,017,359               2,954,220
<CGS>                                        1,884,334               1,962,538
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,884,334               1,962,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               795,858                 730,146
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,000                  68,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                310,168                 192,996
<INCOME-TAX>                                   135,513                  69,511
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            174,655                 123,881
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   174,655                 123,881
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13                     .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13                     .09
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 361 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 361

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
investigations and studies by the Committee on House Administration in 
         the second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 1994

Mr. Rose submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
investigations and studies by the Committee on House Administration in 
         the second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

    Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and studies by 
the Committee on House Administration (hereinafter in this resolution 
referred to as the ``Committee''), including expenses for--
            (1) procurement of consultant services under section 202(i) 
        of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946; and
            (2) provision of assistance for members of professional 
        staff in obtaining specialized training under section 202(j) of 
        such Act;
there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House not more 
than $1,994,288.
    (b) Not more than $225,000 of the amount specified in subsection 
(a) may be used for consultant services referred to in paragraph (1) of 
such subsection and not more than $20,000 of such amount may be used 
for specialized training referred to in paragraph (2) of such 
subsection.
    Sec. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers 
authorized by the Committee, signed by the chairman of the Committee, 
and approved by the Committee on House Administration.
    Sec. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolution for 
investigations and studies carried out during the period beginning at 
noon on January 3, 1994, and ending immediately before noon on January 
3, 1995.
    Sec. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution shall be 
expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on 
House Administration.

                                 <all>
```
No. 00-983.

#### Yuasa, Inc. *v.*International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine and Furniture Workers, AFL-CIO, Local 175.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2022237EN.01001402.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Eight Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — SIA ‘PRODEX’ v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

(Case C-72/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Tariff headings - Subheading 4418 20 - Scope - Doors and their frames and thresholds - MDF panels and mouldings - First sentence of general rule 2(a) for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature - Incomplete or unfinished article - Concept)

(2022/C 237/18)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa (Senāts)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SIA ‘PRODEX’

Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Operative part of the judgment

Subheading 44180 20 of the Combined Nomenclature, read in conjunction with the first sentence of general rule 2(a) for the interpretation of that nomenclature, in Annex 1 to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in its version resulting from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1001/2013 of 4 October 2013, must be interpreted as covering, as separate articles, goods described as wooden panels and mouldings, the profile and decorative finish of which objectively indicate that they are intended for the manufacture of door frames and thresholds, even if incomplete or unfinished, provided that those goods have undergone working which renders them exclusively usable as such and that they thus have the essential characteristics of finished articles.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 19.4.2021.

---
#### Glenn Terrell TREECE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-78.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 26, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Robert W. Tyson, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                       1,149,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,437,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                   168,000
<INVENTORY>                                    835,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,763,200
<PP&E>                                       4,916,200
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,645,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,598,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,747,200
<BONDS>                                      9,764,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,759,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,935,100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,598,600
<SALES>                                      6,204,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,204,200
<CGS>                                        4,483,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,483,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,280,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             268,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                171,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            171,500
<DISCONTINUED>                               (240,700)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                117,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      Exhibit 10

PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL

April 26, 2000



Mr. John Appel
[Address]
[Address]


Dear John:

As we have discussed, it is important to GTE that you remain with the company at
least through the closing of the merger. That being the case, if you remain with
GTE at least through the closing (or, if later, June 30, 2000) but separate as a
result of the merger thereafter, GTE will calculate your lump sum pension
benefit using the interest rate as of July 1, 2000 or the interest rate that
would ordinarily be used given your actual separation date, whichever would
provide you with the highest lump sum benefit. This special interest rate
protection will only be applicable if you elect to receive a lump sum pension
distribution following your separation, and any increase in the amount to which
you are entitled as a result of this commitment will be payable from the general
assets of GTE.

John, I want to thank you again for your flexibility. We need your leadership
now - more than ever. I truly appreciate this additional commitment.

Sincerely,



J. Randall MacDonald
Executive Vice President -
Human Resources & Administration

JRM:wh

c:       J. T. D'Angelo, Jr.
         E. D. Singer
# C_2020433EN.01006501.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/65

---

Action brought on 27 October 2020 — Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking v NG

(Case T-649/20)

(2020/C 433/80)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer, and B. Mastantuono, acting as Agent)

Defendant: NG

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | order the defendant to pay Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking the sum of EUR 168 062,23 in relation to Grant Agreement No 632420 ‘FIMAC, FAST impact cross-analysis methodology for Composite leading edge Structures’ under the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Union, plus interest at the rate of 3,5 % applied by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations, as from 13 July 2019 until the date of actual payment; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking the sum of EUR 168 062,23 in relation to Grant Agreement No 632420 ‘FIMAC, FAST impact cross-analysis methodology for Composite leading edge Structures’ under the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Union, plus interest at the rate of 3,5 % applied by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations, as from 13 July 2019 until the date of actual payment;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following plea in law:

The defendant has failed to fulfil its contractual obligations by failing to reimburse the amount relating to staff costs, held not to be eligible for funding. As a result, the applicant issued, on 12 July 2019, a debit note for the amount of EUR 168 062,23 already paid to Alpha Consulting Service Srl, which has been removed from the commercial register. Pursuant to Italian law, the defendant is liable for Alpha Consulting Service Srl’s failure to fulfil its contractual obligations since it took over the role of shareholder, liquidator and representative of Alpha Consulting Service Srl, which has been removed from the commercial register. The objections made by the company after the debit note was issued are generic, incomplete and not supported by evidence and, therefore, appear to be entirely unfounded. As a result, the applicant is entitled to seek recovery and reimbursement of the amount paid, plus default interest.

---
# Official Journal C 21/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 21 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6514 January 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 21

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6514 January 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 21/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10444 – RWE GENERATION / MESSER INDUSTRIEGASE / KREIS DÜREN / SIEMENS PROJECT VENTURES / JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 21/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10428 – CDPQ / OTPPB / CMLIC) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2022/C 21/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10364 – ECI / BONAK / FAST GROUP) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 21/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10444 – RWE GENERATION / MESSER INDUSTRIEGASE / KREIS DÜREN / SIEMENS PROJECT VENTURES / JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 21/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10428 – CDPQ / OTPPB / CMLIC) (
  1
  )

1

2

2022/C 21/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10364 – ECI / BONAK / FAST GROUP) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2022/C 21/04 | Public holidays 2022 | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2022/C 21/04

Public holidays 2022

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 21/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10539 – SOUTH32 / KGHM / SIERRA GORDA) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 5 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 21/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10539 – SOUTH32 / KGHM / SIERRA GORDA) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

5

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigendum to Joint statement by the European Parliament and by the Council and to Statement by the Commission ( OJ C 523, 28.12.2021 ) | 7 |

Corrigenda

Corrigendum to Joint statement by the European Parliament and by the Council and to Statement by the Commission ( OJ C 523, 28.12.2021 )

( OJ C 523, 28.12.2021 )

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1995
<CASH>                                          61,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  899,900<F2>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    569,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,232,000
<PP&E>                                       3,397,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,588,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,361,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,088,800
<BONDS>                                      1,311,300
<COMMON>                                        94,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,400
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,446,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,361,100
<SALES>                                        853,400<F3>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               857,700
<CGS>                                          500,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  500,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,400<F4>
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,900<F4>
<DISCONTINUED>                                  24,600<F5>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
<FN>
<F1>Restated to reflect the classification of Grace's health care segment as
a discontinued operation.
<F2>Amount shown is net of allowances.
<F3>Excludes sales reported by the discontinued health care segment of $491.8
million for the first quarter of 1995.
<F4>Includes a pretax provision of $20 million ($12.5 million after-tax)
relating to corporate governance activities.
<F5>In June 1995, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had
approved a plan to spin off NMC. As a result, Grace has classified its
health care segment as a discontinued operation.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>