alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Arguelles M.D., P.C., as Assignee of JOSEPH DORCEAN, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Omni Indemnity Company, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Ulysses Bernard Leverett, J.), entered June 14, 2013. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>Arguelles M.D., P.C. as Assignee of Marie Francoeur v Omni Indem. Co.</i> (— Misc 3d —, 2016 NY Slip Op — [appeal No. 2013-1541 Q C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.</p><p>Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Elliot, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: March 30, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,936,084
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    939,635
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,040,036  
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       121,407
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 196,762
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,233,924
<COMMON>                                       284,087
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      501,486
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            784,810
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,570,383
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           25,000
<PREFERRED>                                     78,475
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,699,245
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      269,210
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  114,977
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     88,578
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 6,723
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,381,333
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                5,233,924
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,217,007
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           160,161
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,712,676
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,872,837
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        344,170
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              16,804
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 360,974
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       109,367 <F1>
<NET-INCOME>                                   251,607
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0 <F1>
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  251,607
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       178,423
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       69,545
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         539,141
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.20
<FN>
<F1> PREFERRED DIVIDEND OF SUBSIDIARY INCLUDED IN INTEREST EXPENSE
        



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 187 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 187

Designating certain minority membership on certain standing committees 
                             of the House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 1993

Mr. Michel submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating certain minority membership on certain standing committees 
                             of the House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Agriculture: Mr. Smith, Michigan; and Mr. Everett, 
Alabama.
    Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries: Mrs. Bentley, Maryland; 
Mr. Taylor, North Carolina; and Mr. Torkildsen, Massachusetts.
    Committee on Veterans Affairs: Mr. Stearns, Florida; and Mr. King, 
New York.

                                 <all>
```
1/)UJ .WoW cucu cucu ..c.c (I) (I) 00 00 **~N** I
I 00 **~N** 111111 111111 MM ! 'v I'll \A **~** ,, **~** ;(.) I'll Q " 17t1-::l C) 0 **~ ~**  J1 :iltl **~** 1'\ n, (1;:1

' 1"'11£:) '- **~ ~** **~~ ----~~~~~~~** 

**4r -4**  !I r\¥ **~** )> **~~ ~**  **~ ~**  - **~**0 **~** '}J .! **~ ~**  **~** \.._....< **)::>~ ~~**  ; **~** '\ **~ ~**  ' £1 R c m - **~** 'o f<:::. 7' **~ ~**  l **~**
**~** (}. ' **~ ~**  **~ ~**  N-, **~** SJ .). r- **~ ~** \'\ t> **~ ~**  **~ ~**  f \II p **~~,** \ \') **~** "" 7 D l1r ""' .......... **~** ""
. j· IS'- :t1 '\ **~** g "0 ;() **~** 1"11 Q "V')\ I'\ **~~** iltl::l **~** g \:\) 0 0 "" e **~** 0"'t) **~** "' **~ ~**  L-J **~ ~"1'**  " **~** w **~** ,en

**f?~ :a~**  \) Cl)

.:j 1:: **~**Cl)

} **~** :.c

()' ,en

:3 )0

-. )0

**~** •N ' I JO

CJ3..L IV3(-I•N

'ciJS" un 1111 JM I
**r~\J\) ~** 
**~"** ' \-:'\]Of **®~** ' **~**

p ......

**~** (!;::- " r::v I)" **~**,.._
CTI **~I) ~**  ,>'\)

u 1/ArVS., I II E.A!I r nj **~** S"r:ALI<. a .. .._../**~** )> **~~ ~** - **~**c. jJ **~ ~**  **~ ):)~**  **~~ ~** **~** '\ , II) **~olo:l** LJCI) LJ CD :.c , II) (!\ )0
('. )0 AJ •N c. I
I bQ )0 **~** •N **~** un un JCW) I

**~**
#### RUSKIN VEGETABLE CORPORATION et al., Petitioners, v. SPECIAL DISABILITY FUND OF the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and the Industrial Relations Commission, Department of Commerce, Respondents.

No. 40756.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 14, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


             FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES AND EARNINGS USED IN PER SHARE
                                   COMPUTATION
                        (DOLLARS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED         NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                       SEPTEMBER 30,              SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                   ----------------------    ----------------------
                                                     2000         1999         2000        1999
                                                   ---------    ---------    ---------   ----------
<S>                                                <C>           <C>         <C>          <C>
The weighted average number of shares of
  Common Stock were as follows .................      90,000       90,000       90,000       90,000
                                                   =========    =========    =========    =========
</TABLE>


         Income used in the computation of earnings per share were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED         NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                       SEPTEMBER 30,              SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                   ----------------------    -----------------------
CONSOLIDATED                                         2000         1999         2000          1999
                                                   ---------    ---------    ---------    ----------
<S>                                                <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Net income (loss)...............................   $  27,669    $(387,205)   $  75,933    $(348,174)

Dividends paid on preferred stocks .............        (130)        (130)        (390)        (390)
                                                   ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
Income (loss) used in per share
  computation of earnings.......................   $  27,539    $(387,335)   $  75,543    $(348,564)
                                                   =========    =========    =========    =========

Basic and fully dilutive earnings per share ....   $    0.31    $   (4.30)   $    0.84    $   (3.87)
                                                   =========    =========    =========    =========
</TABLE>
# C_2020287EN.01004602.xml

| 31.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/46

---

Action brought on 22 July 2020 — Ryanair v Commission

(Case T-465/20)

(2020/C 287/68)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, F. Laprévote, S. Rating and I. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the European Commission’s decision (EU) of 10 June 2020 on State Aid SA.57369 (2020/N) COVID-19 — Portugal — Aid to TAP (1); and, |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the European Commission’s decision (EU) of 10 June 2020 on State Aid SA.57369 (2020/N) COVID-19 — Portugal — Aid to TAP (1); and,

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs.
  The applicant has also requested that its action be determined under the expedited procedure as referred to in Article 23a of the Statute of the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

The applicant has also requested that its action be determined under the expedited procedure as referred to in Article 23a of the Statute of the Court of Justice.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision does not establish that the aid falls within the material scope of the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines (R&R Guidelines). (2) |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision does not establish that the aid falls within the material scope of the Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines (R&R Guidelines). (2)

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission misapplied Article 107(3)(c) TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission misapplied Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that the decision violates the principles of non-discrimination, free provision of services and free establishment. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that the decision violates the principles of non-discrimination, free provision of services and free establishment.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Commission failed to initiate a formal investigation procedure. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Commission failed to initiate a formal investigation procedure.

| 5. | Fifth plea in law, alleging that the decision violated the Commission’s duty to state reasons. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Fifth plea in law, alleging that the decision violated the Commission’s duty to state reasons.

---

(1)  European Commission Decision (EU) of 10 June 2020 on State Aid SA.57369 (2020/N) COVID-19 — Portugal — Aid to TAP (OJ 2020 C 228, p. 1)

(2)  Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty (OJ 2014, C 249, p. 1)

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------





    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Western Power & Equipment Corp, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to
the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"),
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange
          Act; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Mark J. Wright
------------------------
Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Accounting Officer
and Vice President of Finance
October 26, 2006
No. 52.

#### Iver Olbers *v.*U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation et al.

Error to the Circuit’Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Argued October 15,16,1925-.

Decided October 26, 1925.

*Mr. J. Frank Staley,*Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom *Solicitor General Beck*and *Assistant Attorney General Letts*were on the brief, for defendants in error.

*Per Curiam.*

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of *Chicago Junction Ry. Co.,*222 U. S. 222, 224; *Boehmer*v. *Pennsylvania R. R. Co.,*252 U. S. 495, 498. *Mr. S. B. Axtell*for plaintiff in error.
Order entered April 16, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00251
- CR
BRYAN KEITH ARELLANE S, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219
- 82219
- 2013



### O RDER
T he Court GRANTS court reporter Susan Jane Lindley’s April 14, 2015 motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record.
We ORDER Ms. Lindley to file the reporter’s record within THIRTY (30) DAYS from
the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
#### In re TRUST under the Will of Newell BOWEN, Deceased. MERCANTILE NATIONAL BANK et al., Petitioners, v. William T. BOWEN, and Bessie Bowen, as Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of Cecil Bowen, Sr., Deceased, Respondents.

No. 40491.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 12, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 240 So.2d 318.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

BOYD, J., dissents.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

# SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

 
| 1.     |   | XImage  Corporation, a California Corporation                                                              |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 2.     |   | ImageWare  Systems ID Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly Imaging  Technology Corporation)  |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 3.     |   | I.W. Systems  Canada Company, a Nova Scotia unlimited liability company                                    |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 4.     |   | ImageWare Digital Photography Systems, LLC, a Nevada limited  liability company (formerly Castleworks LLC) |
|   |   |                                                                                                       |
| 5.     |   | Digital Imaging International GmbH, a company formed under German  laws                                    |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 165 (Friday, August 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 51608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20846]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Funding Availability for the Small Business 
Transportation Resource Center Program

AGENCY: Department of Transportation (DOT), Office of the Secretary of 
Transportation (OST), Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business 
Utilization (OSDBU).

ACTION: Notice of Funding Availability; Extension of closing and award 
dates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action extends the closing and award dates for a Notice 
of Funding Availability for the Small Business Transportation Resource 
Center in the Mid-Atlantic Region that was published on July 20, 2012, 
77 FR 42790. USDOT OSDBU is extending the closing date to allow 
eligible entities time to adequately submit a proposal.

DATES: The submission period for the Notice of Funding Availability 
published on July 20, 2012 closing on September 3, 2012 is extended 
until September 17, 2012, 5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. Also, the 
notice of award for the competed region on or before August 17, 2012 is 
extended until October 1, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Proposals must be electronically submitted to OSDBU via 
email at SBTRC@dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information concerning 
this notice, contact Ms. Patricia Martin, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W56-462, Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: 
1-800 532 1169. Email: patricia.martin@dot.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the July 20, 2012 document (Notice No. 
USDOT-OST-OSDBU-SBTRC2012-11; Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0092), the 
Department of Transportation (DOT), Office of the Secretary (OST), 
Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU) 
announces the opportunity for; (1) business centered community-based 
organizations; (2) transportation-related trade associations; (3) 
colleges and universities; (4) community colleges or; (5) chambers of 
commerce, registered with the Internal Revenue Service as 501 C(6) or 
501 C(3) tax-exempt organizations, to compete for participation in 
OSDBU's Small Business Transportation Resource Center (SBTRC) program 
in the Mid-Atlantic Region.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 15, 2012.
Brandon Neal,
Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization,Office 
of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2012-20846 Filed 8-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Edward R. KIRKLAND, Petitioner, v. E. Thom RUMBERGER, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Seminole County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-427.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 20, 1970.

Prohibition denied.
Exhibit
23   Consent of
Independent Auditors   We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-27979, 333-34169, 333-71858, 333-89930 and 333-106573) and the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-84971, 333-41424, 333-58126, 333-84086,
333-102620 and 333-108668) of our report dated January 26, 2004, with respect
to the financial statements of Endocardial Solutions, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.  /s/ Ernst & Young
  LLPMinneapolis, MinnesotaMarch 15, 2004
No. 00-944.

#### Neslo *v.*Cain, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41481 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JORJE JUAREZ-ARTEZ, JR Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-299-2
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent JorjeJuarez-Artez, Jr., (Juarez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Juarez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR
. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 349

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses

of investigations and studies by the Committee on Natural Resources

in the second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 7, 1994

Mr. MILLER of California submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House

for expenses of investigations and studies by the Committee on Natural Resources in the second session of the

One Hundred Third Congress.

1 Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and

2 studies by the Committee on Natural Resources (herein3 after in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’),

4 including expenses for—

5 (1) procurement of consultant services under

6 section 202(i) of the Legislative Reorganization Act

7 of 1946; and
2

HRES 349 IH

1 (2) provision of assistance for members of pro2 fessional staff in obtaining specialized training under

3 section 202(j) of such Act;

4 there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House

5 not more than $2,243,095.

6 (b) Not more than $2,500 of the amount specified

7 in subsection (a) may be used for consultant services re8 ferred to in paragraph (1) of such subsection and not more

9 than $100 of such amount may be used for specialized

10 training referred to in paragraph (2) of such subsection.

11 SEC. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made

12 on vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

13 chairman of the Committee, and approved by the Commit14 tee on House Administration.

15 SEC. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolu16 tion for investigations and studies carried out during the

17 period beginning at noon on January 3, 1994, and ending

18 immediately before noon on January 3, 1995.

19 SEC. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution

20 shall be expended in accordance with regulations pre21 scribed by the Committee on House Administration.

Æ