alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DelawareAvllltlon Museum Foundation 21871 Aviation Ave Georaetown, DE 19947

443-458-8926 Phone

410.749-2588 Fax www.delawareaylatlonmuseum.om
Federal Aviation Administration Attn: Rules Docket, AGC -10 Office ofChief Counsel 800 Independence Avenue Washington, DC 20591

cc: U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 400

## ih Street SW, Room PL 401 Washington, DC 20591-0001
Dear Sirs:
Re: Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation, petitionerfor extension of Exemption 10872, Docket Number FAA-2013-0506.
The Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation requests an extension of Exemption 10872 which is scheduled to terminate September 30, 2015. In consideration ofthe public interest and safety in which the original petition was granted, the Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation submits the following information to supportthis request: • The conditions and terms that were detailed inthe original petition remain unchanged. • The exemption has been in effect since September 2013 without incident, accident, or injury. • The Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation has established and adhered to all ofthe conditions and limitations, maintenance and training requirements detailed in Exemption 10872.DelawareAviation Museum Foundation 21871 Aviation Ave Georaetown, DE 19947

443-458-8926 Phone

410-749-2588 Fax www
.delawareaviationmuseum.org

If I can be offurther assistance to you inyour review ofthis request, please do not hesitate to contact me at (410) 991-2356, or larrydkelley@aol.com.

# c{;;;JJ~**/.f~~~** larry D. Kelley RPh Director
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.15


Ronald Rosenzweig                                                    27 May 2003
19509 Planters Point Drive
Boca Raton, FL 33434


Subject:  Amendment - Agreement June 1, 1999



Dear Ron:

This is to confirm the extension of the Agreement dated June 1, 1999 between you
and ANADIGICS, Inc. (and extended from July 2, 2002 through July 2, 2003),
regarding your employment by the Company. The existing agreement set to expire
July 2, 2003, will be extended through July 2, 2004 with the same terms and
conditions.

If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please sign and return to John
Warren, a copy of this letter.


Very truly yours,




Bami Bastani
President & Chief Executive Officer
ANADIGICS, Inc.


Accepted and agreed to as stated.


Ronald Rosenzweig
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10320

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN JOSE ALVARES-ALEMAN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:13-CR-59-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Jose AlvaresAleman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Alvares-Aleman has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 2, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-10320 Document: 00512991374 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/02/2015
No. 14-10320

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-10320 Document: 00512991374 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/02/2015
# Official Journal C 92A/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2014.092.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 92A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5729 March 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2014.092.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 92A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5729 March 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2014/C 092A/01 | Reserve lists — Open competition — EPSO/AD/248/13 — Administrators (AD 6) in the buildings sector | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2014/C 092A/01

Reserve lists — Open competition — EPSO/AD/248/13 — Administrators (AD 6) in the buildings sector

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Adoption memo for 8(a) STARS III 

DATE: October 16, 2021

MEMORANDUM FOR: Jaclyn Rubino

Executive Director, Strategic Programs Division

FROM: James Lewis

Executive Director Strategic Solutions Office

SUBJECT: Adoption of 8(a) STARS III Government Wide Acquisition 

Contract (GWAC) as a Mandatory Strategic Sourcing Vehicle. 

Purpose

Protecting the country from ever-evolving threats requires an array of robust Information 

Technology (IT) services. The ability to store, analyze, and securely share data across Department 

of Homeland Security (DHS) Components is critical. Having access to vendors who can provide 

innovative IT services-based capabilities is required for success. The DHS Strategic Solutions 

Office (SSO) recommends the adoption of the 8(a) STARS III GWAC into its Eagle NextGen IT 

Strategic Solutions portfolio.

Rationale

This next-generation GWAC builds on the 8(a) STARS II framework, which was the most utilized 

IT strategic solution in the DHS Eagle NextGen portfolio. 8(a) STARS III is a small business set 

aside GWAC that provides flexible access to customized IT solutions. Adopting 8(a) STARS III

will give DHS access to emerging, cutting-edge technologies unavailable in the current Eagle 

NextGen portfolio of small business GWAC’s. Emerging technologies available under 8(a)

STARS III include;

• Artificial Intelligence (including Machine Learning, Deep Learning/Neural Networks, 

Natural Language Generation)

• Autonomic Computing

• Blockchain / Distributed Ledger

• Quantum Computing

• Robotic Process Automation

• Technological Convergence

• Virtual Reality (including Augmented Reality, Extended Reality, Mixed Reality)

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Washington, DC 20528
Adoption memo for 8(a) STARS III 

Protecting the DHS IT infrastructure is foundational, as cybersecurity is a growing concern 

worldwide. The theft of sensitive information and data using malicious cyber practices is a 

threat to national security. Vendors on the 8(a) STARS III GWAC must meet Cybersecurity 

Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) standards. These standards set clear requirements for 

contractors when it comes to cybersecurity. CMMC compliance will support the DHS objective 

of promoting good cybersecurity hygiene standards.

As referenced earlier, 8(a) STARS III is a small business set aside. Adopting this GWAC into the 

Eagle NextGen IT portfolio is consistent with DHS’s commitment to supporting Executive Order 

(EO) 13985 titled “Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through 

the Federal Government.” It also promotes the DHS commitment to ensuring Department-wide 

contract vehicles and adopted Best-in-Class contracts provide maximum opportunities for small 

and socio-economic designated businesses.

Concurrence:

___________________________________________

Jaclyn Rubino

 Executive Director, Strategic Programs Division
#### DADE COUNTY v. BAL HARBOUR CLUB, INC.

No. 38721.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. So.2d 428. 222
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:34 AM

To: 'mvrjohnson@outlook.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - Avigators [FAA-2014-0720]

Dear Mr. Michael V. R. Johnson:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2014‐

0720).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

•             Describe the aircraft make(s) and model(s) for the proposed UAS operation.  The description(s) should include

the following: size, maximum weight (including payload), and aircraft type (i.e. ‐ fixed‐wing,rotorcraft, lighter‐than‐

air).  This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

•             Identify the type of power source for each proposed aircraft.

•             Provide information regarding the radio frequency spectrum(s).  This information can be located in the aircraft

manual(s).

•             Your petition references a pre‐flight briefing and/or checklist on page four.  Describe the process used to

determine if the UAS is airworthy and in safe condition for operation in the NAS.

•             Describe the process used to document UAS discrepancies and the corrective action taken in the aircraft

record.  Examples of processes include (1) the petitioner has elected to use its own process to maintain its UAS and

ensure that only airworthy and safe UAS will be allowed to operate in the NAS and (2) the petitioner has elected to

maintain its UAS in accordance with the manufacturer maintenance and inspection recommendations.

•             Your petition references the materials listed below, however the materials were not submitted for the

record.  Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

•             Operator’s Manual (Ref. Pg. #7, 8 petition)

•             Operating handbook (Ref. Pg. #10 petition)

•             Flight manual (Ref. Pg. #10 petition)

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 3/5/2015.  If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
2
RE: GE submission

Kline, Kelley (GE Indust, ConsInd) to: Monica Shimamura 10/23/2008 06:05 PM

Follow Up: Normal Priority. 

Thank you, and we are looking forward to working with you on it and answering

any questions you may have.

Kelley

-----Original Message-----

From: Shimamura.Monica@epamail.epa.gov [

mailto:Shimamura.Monica@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 5:05 PM

To: Kline, Kelley (GE Indust, ConsInd)

Subject: GE submission

Hi Kelley,

We received GE's SNAP submission today.

Thank you,

Monica

Monica Shimamura

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Stratospheric Protection Division

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW (6205J)

Washington DC 20460

(tel) 202.343.9337

(fax) 202.343.2362

Address for hand delivery (UPS/Fed Ex/etc):

1310 L St. NW, 10th Floor (1027N)

Washington DC 20005

.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o> .· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o> ,.· ́ ̄`·. ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o>

 ̧.· ́ ̄`·..· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o> .· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o>.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ >< ((((o>

.· ́ ̄`·.><((((o> ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧ ><((((o>.· ́ ̄`·.><((((o> ̧.· ́ ̄`·. ̧><((((o>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 385 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 385

    Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit 
consideration of any measure proposing a balanced-budget constitutional 
  amendment until the Congressional Budget Office certifies that the 
Federal budget has been in balance for the two most recently completed 
                             fiscal years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 1994

 Ms. Margolies-Mezvinsky submitted the following resolution; which was 
                   referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit 
consideration of any measure proposing a balanced-budget constitutional 
  amendment until the Congressional Budget Office certifies that the 
Federal budget has been in balance for the two most recently completed 
                             fiscal years.

    Resolved, That rule XXII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
    ``7. It shall not be in order in the House to consider any measure 
proposing a constitutional amendment to balance the Federal budget 
until the Director of the Congressional Budget Office certifies, in 
writing, to the House that the Federal budget has been in balance for 
the two most recently completed fiscal years before the consideration 
of that measure.''.

                                 <all>
```
# C_2020279EN.01005001.xml

| 24.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/50

---

Action brought on 26 June 2020 — Allergan Holdings France v EUIPO — Dermavita Company (JUVEDERM)

(Case T-397/20)

(2020/C 279/63)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Allergan Holdings France SAS (Courbevoie, France) (represented by: J. Day, Solicitor and T. de Haan, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dermavita Company SARL (Beirut, Lebanon)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark JUVEDERM — European Union trade mark No 2 196 822

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 April 2020 in Case R 877/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul points 3 and 4 of the operative part of the decision insofar as it dismissed the applicant appeal against the revocation of its EU trade mark registration No 2 196 822 JUVEDERM for ‘dermal implants’, and ordered the applicant to bear its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul points 3 and 4 of the operative part of the decision insofar as it dismissed the applicant appeal against the revocation of its EU trade mark registration No 2 196 822 JUVEDERM for ‘dermal implants’, and ordered the applicant to bear its own costs;

| — | order EUIPO and Dermavita Company Ltd to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant, including those incurred by the applicant before the Fourth Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and Dermavita Company Ltd to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant, including those incurred by the applicant before the Fourth Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 64(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 64(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# For industry providers

GSA offers federal agencies two methods to procure relocation services. If you would like your services to be an option for agencies, you must become an approved vendor either through the Multiple Award Schedule or CHAMP.

## Multiple Award Schedule

Agencies procure these services through the GSA MAS SIN 531:
                        - Homesale Assistance
                        - Entitlement Counseling
                        - Expense Management
                        - Group Move Services
                        - Property Management

To become an approved vendor on the Multiple Awards Schedule, visit the Roadmap for New Schedule Offerers for the solicitation documents. Contact the National Customer Service Center after completing the solicitation documents at NCSCcustomer@gsa.gov for assistance.

### CHAMP

The Centralized Household Goods Traffic Management Program (CHAMP) is a tender procurement method where agencies purchase household goods moving services and extended storage. To become an approved transportation service provider in CHAMP, visit the Acquisition Gateway. Approved CHAMP providers manage the entire transportation process via an online system called Transportation Management Services Solution (TMSS) 2.0.

### Acquisition Gateway resources

For current employee relocation resources, vendor approval process, and procurement information, visit ERRC on the Acquisition Gateway.
                        - Visit the  Acquisition Gateway .
                        - Click on the blue "Category Management" button, then under Government-wide Categories select "Travel".
                        - In the left side navigation menu select "Employee Relocation" to expand the menu.
                        - Under the "Household Goods Services" page you can find more information about CHAMP, how to become an approved service provider, details on the Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI), and requirements for Request for Offers (RFO) and Household Goods Tender of Service (HTOS).

##           Employee Relocation Hallway    

## Employee Relocation Resource Center

Visit the Employee Relocation Resource Center on the  Acquisition Gateway for governmentwide relocation solutions, program information, tools, and best practices.

Print PageEmail Page

Top

-  Employee Relocation Resource Center-  Overview 
-  For agencies 
-  For industry providers 
-  Reference library
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION of CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT to SECTION 1350 of CHAPTER 63 of TITLE 18 of the UNITED STATES CODE,

as ADOPTED PURSUANT to

SECTION 906 of THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Frischs Restaurants, Inc. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 9, 2010 (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Registrant certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |     |  |                        
|------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|April 5, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Craig F. Maier     
|              |  |     |  | Craig F. Maier         
|              |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification is being
furnished as required by Rule 13a  14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as other
otherwise stated in such filing.
# C_2020262EN.01003501.xml

| 10.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/35

---

Action brought on 16 June 2020 — Moloko Beverage v EUIPO — Nexus Liquids (moloko)

(Case T-383/20)

(2020/C 262/47)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Moloko Beverage GmbH (Göppingen, Germany) (represented by: D. Wieland, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nexus Liquids GmbH (Bielefeld, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘moloko’ — European Union trade mark No 16 415 838

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 March 2020 in Case R 1485/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and register European Union trade mark No 16 415 838 also for the goods:
  tobacco and tobacco products, including tobacco substitutes; flavourings and solutions for vaporisers for personal use and electronic cigarettes |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and register European Union trade mark No 16 415 838 also for the goods:

tobacco and tobacco products, including tobacco substitutes; flavourings and solutions for vaporisers for personal use and electronic cigarettes

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court and Nexus Liquids GmbH to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings before EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court and Nexus Liquids GmbH to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings before EUIPO.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---