alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Verizon South Inc.





EXHIBIT 99





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Verizon South Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods presented in the Report.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Dated: May 13, 2003 |  | /s/ LAWRENCE T. BABBIO, JR.                      
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | Lawrence T. Babbio, Jr.                          
|                    |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|                   
|Dated: May 13, 2003 |  | /s/ LAWRENCE R. WHITMAN                          
|                    |  | Lawrence R. Whitman                              
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer                          





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Verizon South Inc. and will be retained by Verizon South Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. Res. 115

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

March 4, 1993.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider in the House, any rule of the

House to the contrary notwithstanding, a motion to take

from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 920) to extend the

emergency unemployment compensation program, and for

other purposes, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to

concur in the Senate amendment. The Senate amendment

shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for

one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and

Means or their respective designees. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the motion to final adoption

without intervening motion. The motion shall be divided for

a separate vote on concurring in section 7 of the Senate
2

HRES 115 EH

amendment, any rule of the House to the contrary notwithstanding.

Attest:

Clerk.
254 La. 776

#### Austin B. WISE v. EMPLOYERS MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN et al.

No. 49995.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 8, 1969.

In re: The Travelers Insurance Company and Superior Casing Crews, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Assumption. 224 So.2d 33.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.
# Official Journal C 116A/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2009.116.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 116A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5221 May 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2009.116.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 116A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5221 May 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions |
| 2009/C 116A/01 | Notice of open competition — Information Officer — Brussels Liaison Office — EF/TA/09/05 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

2009/C 116A/01

Notice of open competition — Information Officer — Brussels Liaison Office — EF/TA/09/05

1

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2009/C 116A/02 | Corrigendum to the notices of open competitions EPSO/AD/163/09 — Administrators (AD 6/AD 9) in the field of Data Protection and EPSO/AST/90/09 — Assistants (AST 3) in the field of Data Protection (OJ C 98 A, 29.4.2009) | 3 |

Corrigenda

2009/C 116A/02

Corrigendum to the notices of open competitions EPSO/AD/163/09 — Administrators (AD 6/AD 9) in the field of Data Protection and EPSO/AST/90/09 — Assistants (AST 3) in the field of Data Protection (OJ C 98 A, 29.4.2009)

(OJ C 98 A, 29.4.2009)

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2009/C 116A/03 | REVIEW OF ‘COMPETITION’ C A OJs | s3 |

2009/C 116A/03

REVIEW OF ‘COMPETITION’ C A OJs

s3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### FLORIDA KEYS BOYS CLUB, INC., et al., Appellants, v. James C. PELEKIS et al., Appellees.

No. 72-571.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 1, 1972.

*59Edward C. Vining, Jr., and R. M. MacArthur, M. Charles Nackley, Jr., Miami, for appellants.

Jepeway, Gassen & Jepeway, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal the appellant seeks review of a protective order entered in a pending proceeding in the trial court preventing the taking of a fourth deposition from the ap-pellee, James C. Pelekis.

From the record on appeal it appears that after the deposition of the appellee had been taken, he amended his answer and counterclaim by an allegation charging certain of the appellants with the act of forgery or with a conspiracy to perpetrate a forgery in the execution of a warranty deed to certain property. *This was a new and different charge from that contained in earlier pleadings filed by the cotmterclaim-ant.*It is a very serious charge, one which if true would not only have a material effect on the outcome of the pending litigation but, in all probability, could result in action being taken by certain government agencies. In light of the age of the ap-pellee, it would not be unreasonable to assume that the appellants did desire to preserve his testimony for use at trial in the event he should predecease the trial date. Town of New Castle v. Rand, 101 N.H. 201, 136 A.2d 914; Rule 1.290(d), R.C.P., 30 F.S.A.

Such orders are generally within the discretion of a trial court. City of Miami Beach v. Wolfe, Fla.1955, 83 So.2d 774; Spector v. Alter, Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 517; Burgin v. Florida Gas Utilities Co., Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 267. We find that in the instant case, because of the seriousness of the charge made by the last amended counterclaim, the appellants should be permitted to take the oral deposition of the appellee, James C. Pelekis. It has long been recognized that oral depositions offer a better opportunity to determine the true nature of past events in contrast to written interrogatories. 10 Fla.Jur., Depositions, § 21; 7 Fla.L.Rev. 5.

Therefore, for the above reasons, the order here under review be and the same is hereby reversed.
# Official Journal C 421A/17 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 421A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5817 December 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 421A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5817 December 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2015/C 421A/1 | Reserve Lists — Open Competition EPSO/AD/293/14 — Administrators (AD 7) | 1 |
| 2015/C 421A/2 | Reserve lists — Open Competition EPSO/AST/133/14 — Information and communication technology (ICT) (AST 3) | 5 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2015/C 421A/1

Reserve Lists — Open Competition EPSO/AD/293/14 — Administrators (AD 7)

1

2015/C 421A/2

Reserve lists — Open Competition EPSO/AST/133/14 — Information and communication technology (ICT) (AST 3)

5

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 30993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14258]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act: Notice of Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold 
a meeting on July 17, 2018, 10:00 a.m. at the Board's meeting room on 
the 8th Floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, 
Chicago, Illinois 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:
    Portion open to the public:
    (1) Executive Committee Reports.
    The person to contact for more information is Martha Rico-Parra, 
Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    For the Board.

    Dated: June 28, 2018.
Martha Rico-Parra,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-14258 Filed 6-28-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
TITLE: "MISCELLANEOUS NEWSLETTERS" /PROGRAM 2852-SP

TERM: DECEMBER 1, 2012 to NOVEMBER 30, 2013 (W/OPTIONS)

Basis BKR Printing

Item No. DESCRIPTION of

Award UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE 

I. COMPLETE PRODUCT:

(a) Format A per page 

Black Ink or a Color Other Than Black 

1. Makeready and/or Setup Charges 36 x 25.50 918.00 30.00 1,080.00 35.00 1,260.00 16.02. Per 100 Copies 690 x 1.15 793.50 2.00 1,380.00 2.50 1,725.00 1.3

Each Additional Color of Ink

3. Makeready and/or Setup 22 x 13.55 298.10 30.00 660.00 25.00 550.00 20.04. Per 100 Copies 300 x 0.94 282.00 1.00 300.00 2.00 600.00 1.5

(b) Format B per page

Black Ink or a Color Other Than Black

1. Makeready and/or Setup 8 x 42.50 340.00 48.00 384.00 60.00 480.00 22.02. Running Per 100 Copies 660 x 1.56 1,029.60 3.90 2,574.00 6.00 3,960.00 2.6

Each Additional Color of Ink 

3. Makeready and/or Setup 8 x 16.58 132.64 48.00 384.00 45.00 360.00 27.04. Per 100 Copies 660 x 1.33 877.80 2.00 1,320.00 2.00 1,320.00 2.9

II. ADDITIONAL OPERATIONS:

(a) Digital content proofs..............each page-size unit 44 x 1.45 63.80 5.00 220.00 10.00 440.00 6.0

(b) Timework........................................ per hour 2 x 60.00 120.00 80.00 160.00 150.00 300.00 118.0

III. SHIPPING CHARGES: over 120 lbs

(a) Cost per cwt.............Delivered/Shipped to Zone 1 1 x NC 89.00 89.00 100.00 100.00 36.9

(b) Cost per cwt.............Delivered/Shipped to Zone 2 13 x 33.00 429.00 88.00 1,144.00 125.00 1,625.00 39.9

CONTRACTOR TOTALS $5,284.44 $9,695.00 $12,720.00 

DISCOUNT if any 5.00% 264.22 1.00% 96.95 0.25% 31.80 0.25% 

DISCOUNTED TOTALS $5,020.22 $9,598.05 $12,688.20 

AWARDED

430-08870

LITHEXCEL NPC Inc

300-52436 370-64115

Produ

120

 PAGE 1 OF 1
1 From:

Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 7:50 PM

To: RedHill

Subject: Protect our Water from Jet Fuel

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

I am writing to express my extreme concern for the quality of our drinking water threatened by the jet fuel leaking from

Navy storage tanks in Red Hill.

Please ensure this jet fuel is completely cleaned up immediately. Twenty

‐ five years is too long to wait before acting to

save our most pre cious resource. If the leaks cannot be immediately fixed, then the tanks must be emptied.

I also ask that the public comment period on the negotiated agreement between the U.S. Navy, Environmental

Protection Agency, and Hawaii Department of Health be extended to allow the public meaningful opportunity to

understand an d weigh

‐ in on this important issue.

Please continue to keep me informed in this decision

‐ making process.

Thank you.
EXHIBIT 32.01



                 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350
          OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE



In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Employment
Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his
capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          the operations of the Company.



Date:  February 4, 2008             By:  /s/ Herbert F. Imhoff, Jr.
                                        Herbert F. Imhoff, Jr.
                                        Chairman of the Board, Chief
                                        Executive Officer and President
                                        (Chief executive officer)


Date:  February 4, 2008             By:  /s/ Kent M. Yauch
                                        Kent M. Yauch
                                        Vice President, Chief Financial
                                        Officer and Treasurer
                                        (Chief financial officer)
#### Nancy Mona FAULKNER and Leonard John Metcalfe, as Administrators of the Estate of Edward Bazil Faulkner, Deceased, Nancy Mona Faulkner, individually and as parent, next friend and guardian of Frank Edward Faulkner, Joan Helen Faulkner and John Charles Faulkner, infants; and Livia Varkonyi, individually and as parent, next friend and guardian of Laszlo Varkonyi and Judith Varkonyi, infants, Appellants, v. S. A. EMPRESA de VIACO AIREA RIO GRANDENSE (VARIG), and the Boeing Company, Appellees.

No. 68-471.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 20, 1969.

*806Ralph *&*Anderson, Miami, for appellants.

Batchelor, Brodnax, Guthrie & Kindred, Knight, Underwood, Peters, Hoeveler & Pickle, Miami, Theodore E. Wolcott, New York City, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, as plaintiffs in the trial court, seek review of an order of dismissal of their action sounding in tort upon the doctrine of forum non conveniens.1 We affirm.

The accident out of which the cause of action arose occurred in Lima, Peru. The plaintiffs-decedents were not residents of the United States; they had no contact with this country; they did not purchase their tickets here; their journeys were solely outside of the United States, and we find no abuse of discretion in the trial judge dismissing the action upon, the doctrine of forum non conveniens. Hagen v. Viney, 124 Fla. 747, 169 So. 391; Southern Railway Company v. McCubbins, Fla.App.1967, 196 So.2d 512; Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 67 S.Ct. 839, 91 L.Ed. 1055. Compare Hubbard v. Southern Railway Co., Cir.Ct. Dade Co.1959, 14 Fla.Supp. 10; Baker v. Atlantic Const. Line Railroad Co., Cir.Ct. Duval Co.1963, 21 Fla.Supp. 21.

Therefore, for the reasons above stated, the order here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

. The appellants have a cause of action pending in the courts of the State of New York as a result of the accident in question. Varkonyi v. S. A. Empresa de Viaco Airea R. G., 22 N.Y.2d 333, 292 N.Y.S.2d 670, 239 N.E.2d 542.
#### Ex parte George KEGLEY.

77-258.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 10, 1978.

PER CURIAM:

WRIT DENIED.

BLOODWORTH, MADDOX, FAULKNER, JONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

TORBERT, C. J., and ALMON, SHORES and EMBRY, JJ. dissent.
#### Sixto Adames, Respondent, v Rafael A. Aponte, Appellant.

[721 NYS2d 796]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated May 11, 2000, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

After the defendant established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether he sustained a significant limitation of use of a body function or system as a result of the subject accident (s*ee,*Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; *Tsivikas v Budget Rent A Car Sys.,*278 AD2d 405; *McMonagle v Independent Coach Corp.,*276 AD2d 678; *Grossman v Wright,*268 AD2d 79). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Ritter, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
tvk

utkaAtilkilLa

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

PR 20-0005 FILED

OCT 2 0 2020

IN RE THE MOTION OF WARREN D. DERN FOR

ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF

MONTANA

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Warren D. Dem has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of Montana

pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions

Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on

Character and Fitness has certified that Dem has provided the necessary documentation

and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V.

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions

Administrator, Warren D. Dem may be swom in to the practice of law in the State of

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk

of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State

Bar of Montana. Lrx,

DATED this E-4!) day of October, 2020.

10/20/2020

Case Number: PR 20-0005
..- 1144

g--3/ /4 )•4

Justices

2
p130069.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0069 Focus Ready Draft 11/19/2012

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ EV PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

Page 1p130069.eng

SAT (concerns) (11/09/2012): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Ecotox Related Cases:

Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P1B1T1 . Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb.), No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

Page 2p130069.eng

Page 3p130069.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0069

Page 4p130069.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0069

Page 5p130069.eng

Page 6p130069.eng

Page 7
263 La. 363

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joseph MOSES v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 52899.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 16, 1972.

In re: Joseph Moses applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction. The evidentiary hearing held reveals that applicant did not sustain the burden of proof.
# May 2020
#### Lloyd J. BENNETT, Jr., Appellant, v. George TEGZES, Jr., et al., Appellees.

No. 67-218.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 12, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 12(a)

		    FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
	     COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
											       Six Months Ended
												 June 30, 2000
												   (millions)


<S>                                                                                                    <C>
Earnings, as defined:
  Net income ..............................................................................            $ 204
  Income taxes ............................................................................              101
  Fixed charges included in the determination of net income, as below .....................               71
  Distributed income of independent power investments......................................               33
  Less: Equity in earnings of independent power investments ...............................               16

    Total earnings, as defined ............................................................            $ 393

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges ........................................................................            $  64
  Rental interest factor ..................................................................                3
  Fixed charges included in nuclear fuel cost .............................................                4
  Fixed charges included in the determination of net income ...............................               71
  Capitalized interest ....................................................................               12

    Total fixed charges, as defined .......................................................            $  83

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ........................................................             4.73
</TABLE>