alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
  SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Annual Report of Network CN Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB/A, Amendment No. 1, for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Daley Mok, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
   /s/
      Daley MokDaley
      MokChief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      11, 2008
#### WOLF *vs.*HEATHERS.

General rule as to notice of inquisition or sale of land.

Kent,

October term, 1845.

In this case an inquisition on lands having been set aside for want of proper notice to the' defendant, the court made the following general rule:

No. 45. Notice of holding inquisitions on land, or of sale, shall be served personally on the defendant if residing in the county. If he does not reside in the county, notice shall be served on the tenant, or if there be no tenant, shall be left at the mansion house or other notorious place on the premises.
<PAGE>

                           ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT OF

                            GTE SOUTH INCORPORATED
                            ----------------------


                                      ONE

The name of the corporation is GTE South Incorporated

                                      TWO

Section 1 of the Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company is hereby
amended so as to read in its entirety as follows:

     1.  The name of the corporation is:  Verizon South Inc.

                                     THREE

The foregoing amendment was adopted on June 15, 2000.

                                     FOUR

The amendment was adopted by unanimous written consent of the shareholder.


     The undersigned Assistant Secretary declares that the facts herein stated
are true as of June 30, 2000.


                                GTE SOUTH INCORPORATED



                                By: /s/ Rosalynn Christian
                                   --------------------------------------
                                        Rosalynn Christian
                                        Assistant Secretary



                       See instructions on the reverse.

                                     NOTE

Other methods of amending articles of incorporation are (i) by adoption of the
amendment(s) by vote of the shareholders, as set out in Section 13.1-707 of the
Code of Virginia or (ii) by action of the board of directors or of the
incorporators without the vote of shareholders, as set out in Section 13.1-706
or 13.1-709.
<PAGE>

                                 INSTRUCTIONS

1.   The law requires that the articles be typewritten or printed in black.
White, opaque paper 8 1/2" by 11" in size must be used.  A minimum of a 1"
margin must be provided on the left, top and bottom margins and 1/2" on the
right margin.  Use only one side of a page.

2.   The Certificate of Amendment cannot be issued unless the corporation has
paid all fees and taxes assessed by the Commission.

3.   The articles must be executed in the name of the corporation by the
chairman or any vice-chairman of the board of directors, the president or any
other of its officers authorized to act on behalf of the corporation.



SEND THE ARTICLES ALONG WITH THE $25 FILING FEE PLUS ANY ADDITIONAL CHARTER FEE
                                                ----
AMOUNT REQUIRED BY ANY INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF THE
CORPORATION (SEE SECTION 13.1- 615.1B OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA) TO THE CLERK OF
THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION, P. O. BOX 1197, RICHMOND, VA 23218-1197.
(Street address:  1300 East Main Street, Richmond, VA  23219.) PLEASE MAKE
CHECK PAYABLE TO THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION. (804) 371-9733.



VA005 - 3/24/00 C T System Online
<PAGE>

                                                         Exhibit 23.2




                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 333-38560, 333-32586, and 333-92119 on Form S-3 and Registration
Statement No. 333-44786 on Form S-8 of HomeSeekers.com, Incorporated of our
report dated July 22, 1999 and August 4, 1999 on the consolidated balance
sheet of HomeSeekers.com, Inc. as of June 30, 1999, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for the year
then ended, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
HomeSeekers.com, Incorporated for the year ended June 30, 2000.






ALBRIGHT, PERSING & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Reno, Nevada
October 6, 2000
254 La. 781

#### Mrs. Evelyn FRANCIS v. UNIVERSAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 50010.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 8, 1969.

In re: Universal Life Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 223 So.2d 188.

The application is denied. The judgment complained of is correct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JULY 4, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 4, 1998 FOR GENRAD, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                                          U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUL-04-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                     1
<CASH>                                                         16,143
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  67,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    1,355
<INVENTORY>                                                    37,074
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              124,248
<PP&E>                                                         85,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 48,770
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                212,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          34,127
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       28,901
<OTHER-SE>                                                    120,877
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  212,012
<SALES>                                                        41,163
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               58,940
<CGS>                                                          20,358
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  30,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               53,882
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (12,612)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     (672)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (11,940)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (11,940)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (0.42)
        

</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. R I C HA R D F E R R E R AS DA VI D, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 10373 D. C. No . 1 : 0 8 - c r - 0 0 0 6 4 - FM TG

ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

for the D i stri ctof G uam F r a nc e s T y di ngc o- G a t e w ood, C hi e f J udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J une 29, 2010 ** B e f o r e : A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , a n dG R A B E R , C ir c u it J u d g e s . R i char d F erre ra s D avi d app ea l s f rom the 10 8-m on th sent ence i m po se d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on f ori m port a t i on of

m e tha m phe t a m i ne hy dr oc hl or i de ( i c e ) , i n vi ol a t i on of 21 U . S . C . §§ 952( a ) a nd 960. W e ha ve j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED JU L 21 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 10373 2 D a v idc o n te n d s th e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o c e d u r a llye rr e db yf a ilin g to a d e q u a te ly c ons i de rhi s a r gum e nttha tthe tw o- l e ve l e nha nc e m e ntf ori m port a t i on of m etham ph et am i ne un der U . S . S . G . § 2 D 1. 1(b)(4) cr ea t ed an un w arrant ed se nt enci ng di spar i ty am on g si m i l ar l y s i tuat ed defendant s. T he re cord ref l ec t s that th e d i stri ctco u rtl i st en ed t o th e p art i es’ arg u m en t s an dd i dn o to th erw i se p r o c e d u r a llye rr . Se e U n ite d S ta tes v . Ca r ty , 520 F . 3d 984, 995 ( 9th C i r . 2008) (e n b anc) . D av i dfu rth er co n t en d s h i s sen t en ce i s su b st an t i v el y u n reaso n ab l e b ecau se th e i mp o rt a t i o n e n h a n c e me n ti s a rb i tr a ry , d o e s n o tp r o p e r l yr e f l e c tth e 1 8 U . S. C. § 3553( a ) f

a c t or s , a nd unf

a i r l yove r s t a t e s hi s of

f e ns e c onduc t . I n l i ghtof the to ta lityo f

th e c ir c u m s ta n c e s a n dth e § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) s e n te n c in g f a c to r s , th e s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . See G al l v. U ni ted States , 55 2 U . S . 38 , 51 (200 7); Ca r ty , 5 2 0 F .3 da t 9 9 3 . AF F I RME D.
# Small business resources

The resources below will help you learn more about doing business with us, government contracting opportunities, and marketing your contract.
                        -  Contact information for small business support 
                        -  OSDBU events 
                        -  Government contracting fact sheets 
                        -  Training resources 
                        -  Doing business with GSA video series 
                        -  Interagency task force on veterans small business development 
                        -  Research the federal market 
                        -  Explore business models 
                        -  Register your business 
                        -  Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer programs 
                        -  Small Business non-retaliation policy 
                        -  Resources for 8(a) Business Development Program GSA Multiple Award Schedule vendors 
                        -  Frequently asked questions 

Print PageEmail Page

Top

-  Small business-  Overview 
-  Small business goals and performance 
-  Small business resources    -  Contact information for small business support 
  -  OSDBU events 
  -  Government contracting factsheets 
  -  Training resources 
  -  Doing business with GSA video series 
  -  Interagency Task Force on Veterans Small Business  
  -  Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Programs 
  -  Small Business Non-Retaliation Policy 
  -  Resources for small socioeconomic GSA Multiple Award Schedule vendors 
  -  Frequently Asked Questions 
-  Register your business 
-  Forecast of contracting opportunities
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,029,850
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         143,806
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               152,847
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      12,053,422
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        11,862,984
<LOANS>                                    109,344,406
<ALLOWANCE>                                    718,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             130,901,364
<DEPOSITS>                                 107,343,379
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,200,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,831,091
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,211,856
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,315,038
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             130,901,364
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,760,804
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              940,568
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               165,425
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,866,797
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,018,715
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,036,014
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,830,783
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   15,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,811,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,664,796
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,093,796
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,093,796
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.83
<LOANS-NON>                                    814,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               703,547
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              718,547
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           718,547
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
#### Ronald WHEELER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1475.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July *24,*1973.

Pollack, Yocom & Haggard, Alvin E. Entin, Miami, and Michael Litman, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant defendant seeks review of his convictions and sentences on the charges of unlawful sale and possession of a narcotic drug.

Upon careful consideration of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, we have concluded that no reversible error regarding appellant’s convictions has been made to appear. However, we have noted, and the state has conceded an error in the sentencing of the appellant. See, Yost v. State, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 469. Accordingly, the convictions are hereby affirmed, but the sentences are vacated, and this cause is remanded with directions that the appellant defendant is presented to the trial court and properly sentenced in accord herewith.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part with directions.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 Date:  August 4, 2006
    /s/Jeffrey S. GormanJeffrey S. GormanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/Robert E. KirkendallRobert E. KirkendallSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### STATE EX REL. PATRICK SHEEHAN v. C. S. REED.1

February 4, 1916.

Nos. 19,721—(268).

Case followed.

Upon the relation of Patrick Sheehan this court granted its writ of *habeas corpus*directed to the warden of the state prison.

Relator discharged.

*Theodore W. Thomson,*for relator.

*Lyndon A. Smith,*Attorney General, and *O. Louis Weeks,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

1

 Reported in 156 N. W. 128.

Per Curiam.

The facts in this case are substantially the same as in the case of State v. Reed, supra, page 295, 156 N. W. 128. The same principles of law apply. The petitioner is accordingly ordered discharged.
#### CHARLES BUSH, Adm’r. of ESAU COXE *vs.*PATRICK DEVINE.

If credit be given to an agent, with knowledge of the principal, the latter cannot be charged. If without knowledge of the principal, he may afterwards be charged before settlement between the principal and agent.

Assumpsit for goods sold, &c. Pleas, non assumpsit, &c., &c.

The action was for bricks sold by Coxe, in his life-time, to James Kane, but which were really for defendant. The bricks were charged to James Kane, agent for Patrick Devine.

The defence set up—1. That the bricks were furnished to Kane, as principal; 2. that a part of them were furnished to one Davis, a sub-contractor.

*Mr. Bayard*

offered the books of Esau Coxe in evidence, to prove that a separate account was kept against Davis, and they were objected to.

*Mr. Bayard*

excepted to this opinion.

*The Court*

ruled them out for this purpose, saying they were admissible only to charge the party to the suit, and not to show accounts between other persons.

*The Chief Justice*

charged:—1. If knowing the principal, a sale be made to an agent, and credit be given to the agent, the seller cannot turn round and sue the principal.

*376*Bayard,*for plaintiff.

*Rogers,*for defendant.

2. If a sale be made to an agent, without knowledge of the principal, and the principal be afterwards discovered, the seller may sue the principal, though he charge the goods to the agent; provided he do so at such time as will not disturb any settlement as between principal and agent. *[Roscoe Ev.,*216,, *Bate*vs. *Burr;*4 *Harr. Rep.,*130; 1 *Camp. Rep.,*867.)

Verdict for plaintiff.
Exhibit 23.1 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

Coinstar, Inc: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-30985, 333-89975, 333-63108, 333-98297, 333-100870, 333-120547, and 333-127293) on Form S-8 and registration statements (Nos. 333-120546, 333-123326 and 333-130000) on Form S-3 of Coinstar, Inc. of our reports datedMarch 8, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Coinstar, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income,and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Coinstar, Inc. 

Our report dated March 8, 2007 on the consolidated financial statements referred to above refers to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” effectiveJanuary 1, 2006. 

Our report dated March 8, 2007, on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company acquired Travelex Money Transfer Limited (now known as “Coinstar MoneyTransfer” or “CMT”), during 2006, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, the internal control over financialreporting associated with CMT, which had total assets of $55.8 million, and total revenues of $9.0 million, included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Our audit of internalcontrol over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of CMT. 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington 

March 8, 2007
# C_2013225EN.01008101.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/81

---

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2013 — Cosma Moden v OHMI — s.Oliver Bernd Freier (COSMA)

(Case T-398/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 225/179

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cosma Moden GmbH & Co. KG (Emsdetten, Germany) (represented by: J. Meyer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: s.Oliver Bernd Freier GmbH & Co. KG (Rottendorf, Germany) (represented by: S. Körber and B. Bleifeld, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 July 2012 (Case R 2011/2010-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Cosma Moden GmbH & Co. KG and s.Oliver Bernd Freier & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall bear their own costs and each shall pay half of the costs of the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall bear their own costs and each shall pay half of the costs of the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 331, 27.10.2012.

1

---