alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8180 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to exclude the gray wolf 

from the authority of such Act, to remove the gray wolf from the 

lists of threatened species and endangered species published pursuant 

to such Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 4, 2020 

Mr. TIFFANY (for himself and Mr. STAUBER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to exclude 

the gray wolf from the authority of such Act, to remove 

the gray wolf from the lists of threatened species and 

endangered species published pursuant to such Act, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Managing Predators 

5 Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8180 IH

1 SEC. 2. GRAY WOLF EXCLUDED. 

2 Section 4(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 

3 (16 U.S.C. 1533(a)) is amended— 

4 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘The Sec5 retary shall by regulation’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as 

6 provided in paragraph (4), the Secretary shall by 

7 regulation’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(4) APPLICABILITY TO THE GRAY WOLF.— 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

11 provision of law, this Act does not apply to the gray 

12 wolf (Canis lupus) in Wisconsin, Michigan, Min13 nesota, and Wyoming. 

14 ‘‘(B) DELISTING.—Notwithstanding any other 

15 provision of law, the gray wolf (Canis lupus) in Wis16 consin, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wyoming is re17 moved from the lists of threatened species and en18 dangered species that are published pursuant to this 

19 Act. 

20 ‘‘(C) AUTHORITY IN OTHER STATES.—Notwith21 standing any other provision of law, with respect to 

22 a State other than Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, 

23 or Wyoming, if the population of the gray wolf 

24 (Canis lupus) in such State, as estimated by the 

25 agency of such State that has primary authority 

26 over wildlife management and conservation, is at or 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8180 IH

1 above a population goal established by such agency, 

2 the Secretary may not make a determination under 

3 paragraph (1) that the gray wolf (Canis lupus) in 

4 such State is an endangered species or threatened 

5 species.’’. 

6 SEC. 3. DELISTING OF GRAY WOLF IN CERTAIN STATES. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the gray 

8 wolf (Canis lupus) in Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, 

9 and Wyoming is removed from the lists of threatened spe10 cies and endangered species that are published pursuant 

11 to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 

12 et seq.). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 2, 2019

p0325 

# Order

Clerk April 2, 2019

158280

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158280

COA: 343412

Wayne CC: 13

- 006713

- FC

CARON ADAMS

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 5, 2018 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENI ED, because the defendant has failed to

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999

<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           21,936
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          30,911
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            30,774
<EQUITIES>                                     27,676
<MORTGAGE>                                        112
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   1,557
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 84,990
<CASH>                                          1,383
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              4,687
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          4,273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 98,105
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                18,987
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             7,088
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 18,864
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           1,526
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 2,672
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        2,340
<OTHER-SE>                                     39,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   98,105
<PREMIUMS>                                     25,936
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             4,354
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              1,951
<OTHER-INCOME>                                    385
<BENEFITS>                                     17,275
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     4,765
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            5,773
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,516
<INCOME-TAX>                                      760
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,756
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,756
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.83
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                      0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                 0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                  0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                    0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                     0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             0



</TABLE>
Robert H. Baldwin
    PRESIDENT




                            B E L L A G I O

May 19, 1999




Mr. Stephen A. Wynn
Chairman of the Board and
 Chief Executive Officer
Mirage Resorts, Incorporated
3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South
Las Vegas, Nevada  89109

  Re:  Amendment No. 1 to Fine Art Rental Agreement

Dear Steve:

Pursuant to Paragraph 3  of the letter agreement dated December 31, 1998
between Bellagio and you (the "Rental Agreement"),  this letter confirms
our agreement that, effective this date, the following works of fine art
shall  be added  to Exhibit  A to the Rental Agreement for the following
monthly rent:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                   Work                                     Monthly Rent
     -------------------------------------                  ------------
     <S>                                                      <C>
     "Landscape, Island of la Grand-Jaffe"                    $120,908
     by Georges Seurat (1884, oil on canvas,
     25-5/8 x 31-1/8 inches)

     "Red, Yellow, Orange and Pink on Yellow"                 $ 18,891
     by Mark Rothko (1954, oil on canvas,
     90-1/2 x 54-1/2 inches)
</TABLE>

                P.O. BOX 7700, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89177-7700


                             EXHIBIT 10.2
<PAGE>
Mr. Stephen A. Wynn
May 19, 1999
Page 2


Please  sign  below  to  confirm  your  agreement  to the foregoing.  My
signature below confirms Bellagio's agreement thereto.

Very truly yours,

BELLAGIO




By:  ROBERT H. BALDWIN
     -------------------------------------
     ROBERT H. BALDWIN
     President and Chief Executive Officer


I hereby agree to the foregoing.


     STEPHEN A. WYNN
     -------------------------------------
     STEPHEN A. WYNN

cc:  Bruce A. Levin
     Peter C. Walsh
     James E. Pettis
     George J. Panek
#### PENNSUCO AGGREGATES, INC. and Corporate Group Service, Inc., Petitioners, v. Howard BURKHALTER and Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 44133.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 15, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.48





 


October
21, 2004


 


Mr.
Michael Murphy

Gentris Corporation

133 Southcenter Court, St, 400

Morrisville, NC 27560


 


Dear
Michael:


 


Under
Exhibit B-2 of our lease with Gentris, your company is given an option of adding change orders to the original tenant improvement
contract of up to $10,000. For each $5,000 of tenant improvement money that is amortized into the rent, the rate will increase
by $.08 per annum.


 


We
have attached a copy of the change orders for your suite as of October 12th which total $5,000.00. By signing below,
you are acknowledging the completion of the work and the correlating rent increase of $.08 per square foot per annum. We have
attached a revised rent schedule for your records.


 


	/s/Michael
    Murphy	 	25
    Oct 2004
	Michael
    Murphy	 	Date
	Gentris
    Corporation	 	 


 


	/s/Mitchell
    K. Adams	 	10-21-04
	Michael
    K. Adams	 	Date
	Vice
    President	 	 
	Southport
    Business Park	 	 


 






    	 



     


    

 


Exhibit
A 


Change
Orders


 


[Intentionally
omitted.]


 






    	 



     


    

 


Exhibit
B 


Revised
Rent Schedule


 


[Intentionally
omitted.]
H. Res. 313

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

November 18, 1993.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 796) to assure freedom of access to clinic entrances. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

All points of order against consideration of the bill are

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and the

amendments made in order by this resolution and shall not

exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the

Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall be considered for

amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order

to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment

under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of

a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary

now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of
2

HRES 313 EH

order against the committee amendment in the nature of a

substitute are waived. No amendment to the committee

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules

accompanying this resolution. Each amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an

opponent, and shall not be subject to amendment. All points

of order against the amendment numbered 4 in the report are

waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for

amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to

the House with such amendments as may have been adopted.

Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on

any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to

the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a

substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 10.14a




Pursuant to a letter agreement dated February 16, 1999, the promissory note in
the original principal amount of $7,500,000 issued by the Company to
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (the "Promissory Note") was amended to: (i) extend
the maturity date of the Promissory Note to January 1, 2000; (ii) commencing
June 30, 1999 through the maturity date of the Promissory Note, increase the
interest rate on amounts outstanding under the Promissory Note to a rate per
annum equal to the average LIBOR rate over such period as reported in The Wall
Street Journal plus 4.5%. No other terms of the Promissory Note were affected by
such amendment.
254 La. 787

#### Davis LITTLETON v. ARROW FOOD DISTRIBUTOR, INC., et al.

No. 50027.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 8, 1969.

In re: Arrow Food Distributor, Inc., et al applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 224 So.2d 131.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
live-ex1071_664.htm



Exhibit 10.71

SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 11th day of January 2021, by and between Live Ventures Incorporated (formerly known as LiveDeal, Inc.), a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Jon Isaac (“Executive”).

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have entered into an employment agreement, effective as of January 1, 2013 which was subsequently amended on January 16, 2018 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to further amend the Employment Agreement in the manner reflected herein.

In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements herein contained, intending to be legally bound, the parties agree as follows:

 1.Section 2 of the Employment Agreement hereby is further amended so that the Term is deemed to continue until December 31, 2023, or upon the date of termination of employment pursuant to Section 6 of the Employment Agreement; provided, however, that the Term may be extended as mutually agreed to by the parties.

2.This amendment is deemed to be effective as of December 31, 2020.

3.Except as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

4.This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

 

[Signature Page Follows]




1

 



Exhibit 10.71

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


			
	
LIVE VENTURES INCORPORATED, a Nevada corporation

 
	
 
	
EXECUTIVE

	
By:  __/s/ Michael J. Stein_________

Name:  Michael J. Stein

Title:  Senior Vice President and General Counsel
	
 
	
_____/s/ Jon Isaac___________

Jon Isaac




 

 

2
<PAGE>

                            MVSI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES              EXHIBIT 11

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


                                                      Primary     Fully Diluted
                                                      Earnings      Earnings
Year ended September 30, 1996                         Per Share     Per Share
--------------------------------                     -----------  -------------

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding for the period    10,285,754     10,285,754

Common stock equivalents arising from assumed
 exercise of warrants                                  4,442,849      4,442,849
                                                     -----------  -------------
                                                      14,728,603     14,728,603
                                                     -----------  -------------
                                                     -----------  -------------

Net earnings for the period, as presented            $ 1,012,764    $ 1,012,764

Add: Interest revenue from the assumed purchase of
 government securities, net of tax (A)                   587,036        368,567
                                                     -----------  -------------
Adjusted net earnings                                $ 1,599,800    $ 1,381,331
                                                     -----------  -------------
                                                     -----------  -------------

Earnings per share                                   $      0.11    $      0.09
                                                     -----------  -------------
                                                     -----------  -------------



(A) Results from the 20% limitation on the number of
shares repurchased upon exercise of warrants under
the modified treasury stock method
# Official Journal C 370/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 370 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 598 October 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 370

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 598 October 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 370/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8205 — SEGRO/PSPIB/SELP/Gliwice 5 Logistics Asset) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 370/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8205 — SEGRO/PSPIB/SELP/Gliwice 5 Logistics Asset) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 370/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2016/C 370/03 | Communication from the Government of the Republic of Poland concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 370/02

Euro exchange rates

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2016/C 370/03

Communication from the Government of the Republic of Poland concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 370/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8162 — Daimler/Athlon Car Lease International) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 15 |
| 2016/C 370/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8120 — Hapag-Lloyd/United Arab Shipping Company) (
  1
  ) | 16 |
| 2016/C 370/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8060 — Abbott Laboratories/St. Jude Medical) (
  1
  ) | 17 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 370/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8162 — Daimler/Athlon Car Lease International) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

15

2016/C 370/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8120 — Hapag-Lloyd/United Arab Shipping Company) (
  1
  )

1

16

2016/C 370/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8060 — Abbott Laboratories/St. Jude Medical) (
  1
  )

1

17

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Eugene McArthur BURNEY, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-630.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 19, 1971.

Habeas corpus denied.
259 La. 746

#### J. L. SCIVICQUE v. M. C. KEMP.

No. 51565.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 1971.

In re: M. C. Kemp applying for certiora-ri, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Livingston. 248 So.2d 35.

Writ denied. The result is correct.

McCALEB, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., are of the opinion that the application should be granted as a matter of right. It appears the judgment is in conflict with Edington Drilling Co. v. Yearwood, 239 La. 303, 118 So.2d 419 and Josey v. Howard Lbr. & Supply Co., La.App., 232 So.2d 119.

DIXON, J., dissents from the refusal.
#### P. J. RIZZO et al. v. EMPLOYER’S COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY et al. Elnora H. DUGAS v. FAIR GROUNDS CORPORATION et al.

No. 62665.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Josephine Tusa, wife of/and P. J. Rizzo, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.
#### Kelsey BETHEL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43211.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 14, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Frank F.
Khulusi and Richard M. Finkbeiner and each of them, as attorneys-in-fact, each
with the power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Creative Computers, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
and any amendment to such Form 10-K Annual Report and to file the same, with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting to said attorneys-in-fact, and each
of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact or any of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

   Signature                          Title                         Date
   ---------                          -----                         ----


FRANK F. KHULUSI             Chairman of the Board of           March 30, 1998
---------------------            Directors, President and
Frank F. Khulusi                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 (Principal Executive Officer)

RICHARD M. FINKBEINER        Chief Financial Officer            March 30, 1998
---------------------            (Principal Financial and
                                 Accounting Officer

SAM U. KHULUSI               Director                           March 30, 1998
---------------------
Sam U. Khulusi

AHMED O. ALFI                Director                           March 30, 1998
---------------------
Ahmed O. Alfi
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. William Steven ROUNDTREE and Eddie Chennault, Respondents.

No. 43341.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 6, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 271 So.2d 160.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ADKINS, J., dissents.