alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Eva Ella DUPRE v. CALCASIEU SOUTHERN MAID PAPER COMPANY.

No. 53096.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 15, 1973.

In re: Calcasieu Southern Maid Paper Company applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Allen. 269 So.2d 308.

Writ denied. There is no error of law in the judgment.
No. 00-959.

#### Young et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 372/2005

of 3 March 2005         

fixing the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2277/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For tenders notified from 25 February to 3 March 2005, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2277/2004, the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported shall be 30,18 EUR/t and be valid for a total maximum quantity of 153 000 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 396, 31.12.2004, p. 35.

(3)OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
EXHIBIT 15.1




                  ACCOUNTANTS' AWARENESS LETTER



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


Re:  Global Marine Inc. Registration Statements

We are aware that our report dated August 11, 2000, on our review
of the condensed consolidated interim financial information of
Global Marine Inc. and subsidiaries for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2000, and included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q is incorporated by reference in (a) the prospectus
constituting part of the Company's Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-32088, 33-40961, and 33-63326),
respectively, for the Global Marine Inc. 1989 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan, (b) the prospectus constituting part of the
Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos.
333-80383, 333-40244, 33-32088, 33-40961, and 33-63326) for the
Global Marine 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, (c) the
prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-40266) for the Global
Marine Savings Incentive Plan, (d) the prospectus constituting
part of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 33-40961) for the Global Marine Inc. 1990 Non-
Employee Director Stock Option Plan, (e) the prospectus
constituting part of the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 33-57691) for the Global Marine Inc. 1994
Non-Employee Stock Option and Incentive Plan, (f) the combined
prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 33-58577 and 333-49807)
for the proposed offering of up to $500,000,000 of debt
securities, preferred stock, and/or common stock, and (g) the
prospectus consisting part of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-40244) for the Global
Marine Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan.  Pursuant to
Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should
not be considered a part of any of said registration statements
prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and
11 of that Act.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Houston, Texas
August 11, 2000
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 347

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses

of investigations and studies by the Committee on Armed Services in

the second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 7, 1994

Mr. DELLUMS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House

for expenses of investigations and studies by the Committee on Armed Services in the second session of the One

Hundred Third Congress.

1 Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and

2 studies by the Committee on Armed Services (hereinafter

3 in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), includ4 ing expenses for—

5 (1) procurement of consultant services under

6 section 202(i) of the Legislative Reorganization Act

7 of 1946; and
2

HRES 347 IH

1 (2) provision of assistance for members of pro2 fessional staff in obtaining specialized training under

3 section 202(j) of such Act;

4 there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House

5 not more than $2,669,197.

6 (b) Not more than $40,000 of the amount specified

7 in subsection (a) may be used for consultant services re8 ferred to in paragraph (1) of such subsection and not more

9 than $8,000 of such amount may be used for specialized

10 training referred to in paragraph (2) of such subsection.

11 SEC. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made

12 on vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

13 chairman of the Committee, and approved by the Commit14 tee on House Administration.

15 SEC. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolu16 tion for investigations and studies carried out during the

17 period beginning at noon on January 3, 1994, and ending

18 immediately before noon on January 3, 1995.

19 SEC. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution

20 shall be expended in accordance with regulations pre21 scribed by the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
# C_2021028EN.01005701.xml

| 25.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/57

---

Action brought on 13 November 2020 — Pluscard Service v EUIPO (PLUSCARD)

(Case T-669/20)

(2021/C 28/86)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Pluscard Service-Gesellschaft für Kreditkarten-Processing mbH (Saarbrücken, Germany) (represented by: M. Dury, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark PLUSCARD — Application for registration No 1 494 424

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 September 2020 in Case R 638/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that:

| — | the reasons given by EUIPO and the conclusions drawn by EUIPO shall be revisited; |
| --- | --- |

—

the reasons given by EUIPO and the conclusions drawn by EUIPO shall be revisited;

| — | the registration of the sign PLUSCARD should therefore be granted as applied for, for all classes, including classes applied for; |
| --- | --- |

—

the registration of the sign PLUSCARD should therefore be granted as applied for, for all classes, including classes applied for;

| — | furthermore, due to the distinctive language barriers complicating the resolution of this case, the summoning of oral proceedings is requested and encouraged. |
| --- | --- |

—

furthermore, due to the distinctive language barriers complicating the resolution of this case, the summoning of oral proceedings is requested and encouraged.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           14946
<SECURITIES>                                     10732
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 21637
<PP&E>                                           40676
<DEPRECIATION>                                     931
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   67430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1022
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        102439
<OTHER-SE>                                     (37025)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     67430
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   569
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1222)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1222)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1222)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2020433EN.01006101.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/61

---

Action brought on 15 October 2020 — Delifruit v Commission

(Case T-629/20)

(2020/C 433/76)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Delifruit, SA (Guayaquil, Ecuador) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, P. Sellar and S. Saez Moreno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the application admissible and well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the application admissible and well-founded;

| — | partially annul the Contested Act, as amended by Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/1085, in so far as it establishes the maximum residue levels for chlorpyrifos for bananas at 0,01 mg/kg; and, |
| --- | --- |

—

partially annul the Contested Act, as amended by Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/1085, in so far as it establishes the maximum residue levels for chlorpyrifos for bananas at 0,01 mg/kg; and,

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks the partial annulment of the Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/1085 of 23 July 2020 amending Annexes II and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos-methyl in or on certain products (1), as amended by Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/1085 (2).

In support of the action, the applicant alleges the Commission has committed a manifest error of assessment by not taking into account a relevant factor (a substantive study disproving one of the alleged reasons for the adoption of the maximum residue limit) in its assessment leading to the adoption of the contested act, and, in so doing, has also infringed Article 14(2) (a) and (f) of Regulation 396/2005 which require that all relevant and available data be taken into account by it.

---

(1)  OJ 2020 L 239, p. 7

(2)  OJ 2020 L 245, p. 31

---
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Last Will and Testament of Mary A. Waldron, Deceased.

(Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

November, 1911.)

Wills — Probate, establishment and annulment — Probate — Costs — Allowance to unsuccessful contestant.

The executor named in an instrument that has been admitted to probate as a last will and testament may be allowed his costso and necessary disbursements and expenses in an unsuccessful contest of the probate of a later will, but can only be allowed the amounts he has actually expended.

Proceeding upon the probate of a will.

M. E. McGoldrick, for proponent.

Joyce & Kavanagh, for contestant.

Myles Purvin, special guardian.

Ketoham, S.

Before the propounded paper came to light a will of earlier date was admitted to probate. In this earlier will the husband of the testatrix was named as executor, and *311upon its probate létters were issued to Mm, which he still holds.

• As such executor, he has contested the later will, without success. He now asks that he be awarded costs, necessary disbursements and expenses incurred by him in the attempt to sustain the will in which he was named.

It will be the finding of the court that he propounded the earlier will in good faith and, if necessary, that he has waged the present contest in good faith.

By the amendment, in 1911, of section 2558 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is provided that, if the unsuccessful contestant *“*is named as an executor in a paper propounded by him, in good faith, as the last will of the decedent * * * such person so named as executor may, in the discretion of the surrogate, be awarded costs and all necessary disbursements made by him and all expenses incurred in the attempt to sustain the will.”

While the profession has supposed that this- amendment was provoked by the case of Dodd v. Anderson, 197 Ü5T. Y. 466, and was in tended, to indemnify the unsuccessful proponent for his outlays made in good faith, such intention, if conceived by the Legislature, has been so obscured that only the most zealous and generous construction will reveal it.

The text of the statute is, however, perfectly adapted to the present case, of one who, holding letters under ■ another will, is an unsuccessful contestant of the instrument admitted tc probate.

The statute only permits the allowance of disbursements made ” and expenses “ incurred,” and the decree will be held until proof is made of the sums actually paid

Decreed accordingly.
### Public Hearing

Department of Ecology Air Quality Program

Including the Puget Sound Ozone Maintenance Plan

in the State Implementation Plan

The Department of Ecology (Ecology) is holding a public hearing on proposed changes to the

State Implementation Pl an (SIP). The SIP is a statewide plan for meeting federal air quality

standards.

Background information

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revised the air quality standard for ozone air

pollution to better protect public health

. EPA changed th e standard from a one

- hour standard to

an eight

- hour standard. When EPA changes an air quality standard, the Clean Air Act requires

states to develop a plan to implement, maintain, and enforce the revised standard. States submit

these plans to EPA for ap proval. If EPA approves a state’s plan, it becomes part of the SIP.

The Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( P SCAA) developed a n Ozone Maintenance Plan SIP

revision for the Central Puget Sound area

. The Central Puget Sound area includes Pierce

County, nearly al l of King Count y

, and western Snohomish County

. PSCAA’s plan update s the

previous maintenance plan to the new eight

- hour standard. Th e plan shows the Central Puget

Sound area will continue to meet the eight

- hour ozone standard through 2015. The plan als o includes a contingency plan in case the area exceeds or violates the eight

- hour ozone standard.

Public hearing schedule

Ecology will hold a hearing t o receive public comment on including PS CAA’ s maintenance plan

in the SIP :

Tuesday, October 2 , 200 7 Department of Ecology

2:00 p.m. Northwest Regional Office

3190 160 th Avenue SE

Bellevue , WA 98008

- 5452

You can review copies of the SIP revision at the following locations:

Department of Ecology Department of Ecology

Air Quality Program Northwest Regional Office

300 Desmond Drive 3190

– 160 th Avenue SE

Lacey, WA 98503 Bellevue, WA 98008

- 5452

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Everett Public Library

1904 3 rd Avenue, Suite 105 2702 Hoyt Avenue

Seattle, WA 98101

- 2038 Everett, WA 98 201

Pierce County Library

3005 112th St. E

Tacoma, WA 98446

- 2215How to comment

You can comment in person at the hearing

, or mail, email or FAX your comments to:

Doug Schneider

Department of Ecology

P.O. Box 4700

Olympia, WA 98504

- 7600

FAX: (360) 40 7

- 7534

Email: dsch461@ecy.wa.gov

You must provide your comments by 5:00 p.m

. October 2, 2007

.

For more information

Doug Schneider

Department of Ecology

P.O. Box 4700

Olympia, WA 98504

- 7600

Phone: (360) 407

- 6874

FAX: (360) 407

- 7534

Email: dsch461@ecy.wa.gov

If you have special accommodation needs, please call Tami Dahlgren of the Air Quality

Program at (360) 407

- 6800 by September 25 . If you have a hearing loss

, call 711 for Washington

Relay Service. If you have a speech disability

, call 877

- 833

- 6341.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 30162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL18-175-000]


American Municipal Power, Inc.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on June 20, 2018, American Municipal Power, Inc. 
submitted a filing of proposed cost-based revenue requirement for the 
provision of Reactive Supply and Voltage Control from Generation or 
Other Sources Service under Schedule 2 of the PJM Interconnection, 
L.L.C. Open Access Transmission Tariff.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
website that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bafcffe8f9f5d4d6d3d4dfe9cfcacad5c8cefadcdfc8d994ddd5cc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="70363522333f1e1c191e15230500001f020430161502135e171f06">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 11, 2018.

    Dated: June 21, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-13854 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Surface Transportation Board

                    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (WB18-19—6/20/18) for permission to use data from the Board's 2016 and 2017 Masked Carload Waybill Samples. A                           ( print page 31254)                        copy of this request may be obtained from the Board's website under Docket No. WB 18-19.                

The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.

*Contact:*                     Alexander Dusenberry, (202) 245-0319.                

Jeffrey Herzig,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2018-14278 Filed 7-2-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4915-01-P