alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Warren C. SCHUUR and Carolyn Schuur, his wife, Appellants, v. CAROLINA MOON COURT, a/k/a Carolina Moon Trailer Park, Frank Fernandez, individually and as Trustee of Trust created by Gumersindo Fernandez Estate, d/b/a Carolina Moon Court, and/or Carolina Moon Trailer Park, and the Trust Created By Gumersindo Fernandez Estate, Appellees. Granville GILLETTE, Pearl Gillette and Sue Gillette, Appellants, v. CAROLINA MOON COURT, a/k/a Carolina Moon Trailer Park, Frank Fernandez, individually and as Trustee of Trust created by Gumersindo Fernandez Estate, d/b/a Carolina Moon Court, and/or Carolina Moon Trailer Park, and Trust Created By Gumersindo Fernandez Estate, Appellees.

Nos. 69-333, 69-334.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 30, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 12, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### The FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, a stock company, Petitioner, v. James P. SELVAGE and Helen Selvage, his wife, Respondents.

No. 40770.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 30, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 30, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 242 So.2d 161.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Richard Lee PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-463.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 3, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Seminole County; Dominick J. Salfi, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 21

Providing for savings in the operations of the House of Representatives

to be achieved by transferring functions to private sector entities and

eliminating staff positions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. ROBERTS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing for savings in the operations of the House of

Representatives to be achieved by transferring functions

to private sector entities and eliminating staff positions.

1 Resolved, That, not later than the end of the One

2 Hundred Second Congress, the Speaker shall take such

3 action as may be necessary to transfer the activities and

4 entities listed in section 2 to the private sector in order

5 to achieve the annual cost savings and staff reductions

6 specified in such section, which amount to annual cost sav7 ings of $25,858,000 (estimated) and staff reductions of

8 1,015 positions.
2

•HRES 21 IH

1 SEC. 2. The activities, entities, annual cost savings,

2 and staff reductions referred to in the first section are

3 as follows:

4 (1) House Restaurant System, annual cost sav5 ing: $1,800,000, staff reduction: 220 positions (esti6 mated).

7 (2) House Post Office, annual cost saving:

8 $3,900,000, staff reduction: 160 positions.

9 (3) House Recording Studio, annual cost sav10 ing: $1,950,000, staff reduction: 42 positions.

11 (4) Office Supply, annual cost saving:

12 $1,070,000, staff reduction: 37 positions.

13 (5) Furnishings Office, annual cost saving:

14 $4,180,000, staff reduction: 147 positions.

15 (6) House Information Systems, annual cost

16 saving: $5,050,000, staff reduction: 127 positions.

17 (7) Photography Office, annual cost saving:

18 $540,523, staff reduction: 14 positions.

19 (8) Barbershop, annual cost saving: $160,737,

20 staff reduction: 7 positions.

21 (9) Beauty Shop, annual cost saving: $252,000,

22 staff reduction: 11 positions.

23 (10) Folding Room, annual cost saving:

24 $4,100,000, staff reduction: 168 positions.
3

•HRES 21 IH

1 (11) Child Care Center, annual cost saving:

2 $394,737, staff reduction: 18 positions.

3 (12) Capitol Police, annual cost saving:

4 $2,400,000, staff reduction: 64 positions.

5 (13) Democratic Personnel Committee: annual

6 cost saving, $105,000, staff reduction: 2 positions.

Æ
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

37 38 39 40



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/19 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Edwin C. Philbrick and Paul M. Warburg, as Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Julia Hallgarten, Deceased.

(Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

November, 1911.)

Wills — Interpretation and construction — Terms defining the nature and quality of estates or interests — Fiduciary or individual, legal or equitable and other qualified interests — Trusts implied.

A bequest to one with the added words, “ it being understood between us that she is to spend said amount in charity, both in the Kingdom of Italy and in the City of New York, U. S. A.,” is not a personal bequest to the legatee, but was intended to be held by ' her in trust and used for'purposes so indefinite and uncertain as to render the gift-'void.

Proceeding upon the judicial settlement of the accounts of .executors.

Duer, Strong & Whitehead (Marshal Stearns, of counsel), for executors.

Thomas Garmody, Attorney-General, for State.

*328Cohalan, S.

Testatrix died on the 1st day of June, 1909, leaving a last will and testament dated March 21, 1908, and a codicil thereto dated December 16, 1908. Upon the judicial settlement of the accounts of the proceedings of the executors the question of the validity of the following paragraph of the codicil is raised: “ I give, devise and bequeath the amount which has been bequeathed to me by'the.last will and testament *of my*son to my daughter, it *being*understood between us that she is to. spend said amount in charity, both in the. Kingdom of Italy .and in the City of Hew Yorlc, U. S. A.”'

The bequest evidently was intended by the testatrix not for the personal benefit of-the legatee, but to be held by her in trust and used for the general purpose specified by her. Gross v. Moore, 68 Hun, 412, 414; affd., 141 N. Y. 559, upon opinion below; Matter of Keenan, 107 App. Div. 234. That purpose may.comprehend a variety or infinitude of objects and purposes as contradistinguished from beneficiaries, any one of which may or may not have been contemplated by the testatrix, making utterly improbable the ascertainment and execution of her purposes and intentions by any court owing to their great indefiniteness and uncertainty.

The bequest mustj' therefore, be declared void, and this notwithstanding the greatly enlarged powers to make gifts for charitable and benevolent objects given by chapter 701, Laws of 1893, and chapter 291, Laws of 1901, which, so far as they affect -personal property, are now embodied in section 12, article 2, chapter 41 of the Consolidated Laws. Matter of Scott, 31 Misc. Rep. 86, 87; Manley v. Fiske, 66 id. 390, and 139 App. Div. 667; Matter of Shattuck, 193 N. Y. 446. The amount ineffectually attempted to. be bequeathed passes bo the residuary legatees under the will of decedent.

Decreed accordingly.
#### ARTBOHL INC., a Florida corporation, and Donald A. Bohl and Dorothy Z. Bohl, his wife, Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL ART GUILD, LTD., a Florida corporation, and Marketing Associates International Corporation, a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 69-399.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 8, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 12, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
House Calendar No. 150

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 414

[Report No. 103–485]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3254)

Science Foundation, and for other purposes.to authorize appropriations for the National

APRIL 28, 1994

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 150

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 414

[Report No. 103–485]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3254) to authorize appropriations

for the National Science Foundation, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1994

Mr. HALL of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3254) to authorize appropriations for the National Science Foundation,

and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of

3 rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 3254) to authorize appropriations

6 for the National Science Foundation, and for other pur7 poses. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.
2

HRES 414 RH

1 General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not

2 exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the

3 chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

4 on Science, Space, and Technology. After general debate

5 the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five6 minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original

7 bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute

8 rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute rec9 ommended by the Committee on Science, Space, and Tech10 nology now printed in the bill. The committee amendment

11 in the nature of a substitute shall be considered by title

12 rather than by section. Each title of the committee amend13 ment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as

14 read. Points of order against the committee amendment

15 in the nature of a substitute for failure to comply with

16 clause 5(a) of rule XXI are waived. At the conclusion of

17 consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee

18 shall rise and report the bill to the House with such

19 amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may

20 demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

21 adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to

22 the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute.

23 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on

24 the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without
3

HRES 414 RH

1 intervening motion except one motion to recommit with

2 or without instructions.
#### AMFAC DRUG SUPPLY COMPANY v. William J. DRAGO, d/b/a Nottingham Pharmacy, et al.

No. 61648.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 3, 1978.

In re: Amfac Drug Supply Co., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 358 So.2d 962.

Writ granted. Appeal reinstated.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 228

To declare that July 28, 1993, be recognized as Parents Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 1993

Mr. BURTON of Indiana submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

RESOLUTION

To declare that July 28, 1993, be recognized as Parents

Day.

Whereas the values of sacrificial love and integrity are fundamental in developing the moral character essential to

maintaining a strong nation;

Whereas parents by their example of sacrificial love and the

transmission of moral and cultural values play a crucial

and determinant role in the development of youth;

Whereas time has demonstrated that the traditional American family is the most stable and secure environment in

which parents can successfully rear future generations;

Whereas the current breakdown of the traditional American

family is a major factor contributing to the rise of crime,

teen pregnancy, educational failure, substance abuse, and

suicide among our Nation’s youth; and
2

HRES 228 IH

Whereas it is in the interest of society and government to

adopt policies that help families stay together by

strengthening and sustaining fathers and mothers in fulfilling their parental roles: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That on Parents Day, July 28, 1993, all

2 private citizens, organizations, and governmental and leg3 islative bodies at the local, State, and Federal level are

4 encouraged to recognize this day through proclamations,

5 activities, and educational efforts in the furtherance of

6 recognizing, uplifting, and supporting the role of parents

7 in the rearing of their children.

Æ
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05355

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 05355\05355_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05355\05355_Completeness_Checklist1.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

05355\05355_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05355\05355_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05355\05355_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05355\05355_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05355\05355_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05355\05355_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

05355\Certification Statement_05355.pdf Plant certification statement

05355\Supporting Documentation\05355_A5[1].2 MAP-1.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05355\Supporting Documentation\05355_A5[1].2 MAP-2.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05355\Supporting Documentation\05355_A5[1].2 MAP-3.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05355\Supporting Documentation\05355_A5[1].2 MAP-4.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05355\Supporting Documentation\05355_A5[1].2 MAP-5.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05355\Supporting Documentation\05355_A5[1].2 MAP-6.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05355\Supporting Documentation\05355_A5[1].2 MAP-7 PROPERTY LINE.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05355\Supporting Documentation\05355_A5[1].3 WB-1.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05355\Supporting Documentation\D3[1].1 D-1 POND SYSTEM.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05355\Xcel Energy Certification Statement.pdf Cover Letter / Plant certification statement

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# Jan 2022
#### Antonio GARCIA, Appellant, v. COZY COVE MARINA, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-222.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 30, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; James F. Minnet, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
IV

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 426

To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to allow Members

to require rollcall votes to strike specific line items contained in appropriation bills.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1994

Mr. GOODLATTE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to

allow Members to require rollcall votes to strike specific

line items contained in appropriation bills.

1 Resolved, That rule XXI of the Rules of the House

2 of Representatives is amended by inserting at the end the

3 following new clause:

4 ‘‘8. Any Member may demand a rollcall vote to strike

5 any line item in any measure making or continuing appro6 priations if supported by 49 other Members. If that vote

7 does not occur, then it shall be in order for that Member

8 to make a point of order against further consideration of

9 that measure by the House.’’.
2

•HRES 426 IH

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 219 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 219

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 21, 1993.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, elected 
to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Government Operations: Gene Green, Texas, and Bart Stupak, 
Michigan.
    Committee on Armed Services: Sam Farr, California.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Carryetta COOK, widow of Deceased Employee Donald R. Cook et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al., Respondents.

No. 36405.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 26, 1967.

Steve M. Watkins, of Truett & Watkins, Tallahassee, Eugene W. Harris, of Peterson, Peterson & Harris, Lakeland, for petitioners.

Wm. C. Blake, Jr., of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 7, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis*69pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ-, concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. John MITCHELL v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 53907.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 14, 1973.

In re: John Mitchell applying for writs of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ refused. A certified copy of the trial court records shows that the district judge denied the petition for habeas corpus on September 6, 1973. Hence, this application is moot.
# C_2020247EN.01004102.xml

| 27.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/41

---

Action brought on 29 May 2020 — 4B Company v EUIPO — Deenz (Pendants (jewellery))

(Case T-329/20)

(2020/C 247/57)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: 4B Company Srl (Montegiorgio, Italy) (represented by: G. Brogi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Deenz Holding Ltd (Dubai, United Arab Emirates)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design No 2 100-0001

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 March 2020 in Case R 2449/2018-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it annulled the decision of the Cancellation Division, granted the application to maintain Community design No 21 00-0001 in amended form and allowed the design in amended form to be included on the register and published in the Community Designs Bulletin, and, as a result, confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division of 15 October 2018 in Case ICD 10 654; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it annulled the decision of the Cancellation Division, granted the application to maintain Community design No 21 00-0001 in amended form and allowed the design in amended form to be included on the register and published in the Community Designs Bulletin, and, as a result, confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division of 15 October 2018 in Case ICD 10 654;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement and misinterpretation of Article 25(6) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement and misinterpretation of Article 25(6) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

---
#### William ADAMS v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 53177.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1973.

In re: St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 270 So.2d 307.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
#### In the Matter of ADOPTION OF Norma Sue MOSLEY, a Minor. Norman B. MOSLEY et al., Appellants, v. Martha Mosley ADEN, Appellee.

No. 46138.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 15, 1971.

Fred Witty, Greenwood, for appellants.

Fraiser & Burgoon, Greenwood, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 290 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 290

    Providing that the House may not adjourn to end this session of 
  Congress until it receives the report of the Joint Committee on the 
    Organization of the Congress and votes upon its recommendations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 28, 1993

 Mr. Cooper submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Providing that the House may not adjourn to end this session of 
  Congress until it receives the report of the Joint Committee on the 
    Organization of the Congress and votes upon its recommendations.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives may not agree to a 
resolution providing for adjournment sine die for the first session of 
this Congress until the House has received the report of the Joint 
Committee on the Organization of the Congress and voted upon its 
recommendations.

                                 <all>
```
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 236

To declare that July 28, 1994, be recognized as Parents Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 4, 1993

Mr. BURTON of Indiana submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

RESOLUTION

To declare that July 28, 1994, be recognized as Parents

Day.

Whereas the values of sacrificial love and integrity are fundamental in developing the moral character essential to

maintaining a strong Nation;

Whereas parents by their example of sacrifical love and the

transmission of moral and cultural values play a crucial

and determinant role in the development of youth;

Whereas time has demonstrated that the traditional American family is the most stable and secure environment in

which parents can successfully rear future generations;

Whereas the current breakdown of the traditional American

family is a major factor contributing to the rise of crime,

teen pregnancy, educational failure, substance abuse, and

suicide among our Nation’s youth; and
2

HRES 236 IH

Whereas it is in the interest of society and government to

adopt policies, that help families stay together by

strengthening and sustaining fathers and mothers in fulfilling their parental roles: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That on Parents Day, July 28, 1994, all

2 private citizens, organizations and governmental and legis3 lative bodies at the local, State and Federal level are en4 couraged in recognize this day through proclamations, ac5 tivities and educational efforts in the furtherance of rec6 ognizing, uplifting and supporting the role of parents in

7 the rearing of their children.

Æ
No. 11584.

#### The State, ex rel. McMahon, Prosecuting Attorney, *v.*Madigan, Treasurer, et al.

Decided December 23, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. Sylvester V. McMahon,*prosecuting attorney, and *Messrs. Ford, Snyder & Tilden,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. H. IT. McKeehan; Mr. John L. Cannon*and *Mr. Frank S. Day,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew and Davis, JJ., concur.