alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             373
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (439)
<INVENTORY>                                     31,927
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,120
<PP&E>                                          38,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (16,107)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 339,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,173
<BONDS>                                        196,725
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   339,176
<SALES>                                        132,479
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,479
<CGS>                                           76,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  121,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   125
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,880
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    393
<INCOME-TAX>                                       956
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (563)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (563)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (5.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (5.63)
        

</TABLE>
#### Olin DORSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-66.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 10, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 8, 1973.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Thomas C. Turner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Parrish v. State (Fla.App.1957), 97 So.2d 356.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K„ JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             653
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              70
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,500
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               741
<LOANS>                                         89,380
<ALLOWANCE>                                        671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,849
<DEPOSITS>                                      70,870
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,578
<LONG-TERM>                                     13,739
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  99,849
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,762
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  280
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   271
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,313
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,843
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 639
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,831
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       68
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,449
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,550
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,550
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,020
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.81
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,263
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   704
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      158
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  614
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               614
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Jack Lee ADAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-171.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 23, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-QSB of General Devices,  Inc., for the three months ended March 31, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000040528
<NAME>                                         GENERAL DEVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            20
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  20
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    20
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         100
<OTHER-SE>                                       (80)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      20
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   9
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (9)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (9)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (9)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

I, Frank A. Lodzinski, certify that:

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GeoResources, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank A. Lodzinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Frank A. LodzinskiFrank A. LodzinskiChief Executive OfficerNovember 5, 2009
# C_2020390EN.01004101.xml

| 16.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 390/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 390/41

---

Action brought on 28 September 2020 — Univers Agro v EUIPO — Shandong Hengfeng Rubber & Plastic (AGATE)

(Case T-592/20)

(2020/C 390/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Univers Agro EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: C. Hernández-Martí Pérez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Shandong Hengfeng Rubber & Plastic Co. Ltd (Dongying, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trademark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark AGATE — European Union trade mark No 16 440 596

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 July 2020 in Case R 725/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | declares the EUTM No 16 440 596 as a valid trade mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

declares the EUTM No 16 440 596 as a valid trade mark;

| — | order EUIPO, and if applicable, the intervener, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO, and if applicable, the intervener, to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by considering the EUTM proprietor acted in bad faith when the application for the mark was filed; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by considering the EUTM proprietor acted in bad faith when the application for the mark was filed;

| — | Infringement of Article 60(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 60(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
#### T. W. OTWELL v. HOWARD LUMBER COMPANY, INC.

No. 54125.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1973.

In re: T. W. Otwell applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, Parish of Jackson. 283 So.2d 826.

Writ denied. Under the facts found by the Court of Appeal we cannot find error in the result.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 
**- 6486** 

VEOTIS HARDING , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.

JOHN W. OWENS , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:13

- hc

- 02212

- BO )

Submitted : August 27, 2015 Decided: September 3, 2015

Before WILKINSON and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Veotis Harding , Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Veotis Harding seeks to appeal the district court’s order
construing his “motion of actual innocence” as one under 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) , and docketing it within his criminal case.
The motion is proceeding in Harding’s criminal docket. * This
court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1291 (20 12 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (20 12 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The

order Harding seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Although the clerk’s order accompanying the district court’s order states that “respondent’s motion to dismiss is granted and this action is hereby dismissed,” the motion is proceeding under Harding’s criminal docket. Thus, the clerk’s order is erroneous.
# Release of Claims

                - Title:  Release of Claims 
                - Form #:         GSA1142      
                - Current Revision Date:  05/2015
                - Authority or Regulation:  PBS P 2800.6A

PDF versions of forms use Adobe      ReaderTM.      Download Adobe ReaderTM

Search for another form

Print PageEmail Page

Top
# C_2020320EN.01002501.xml

| 28.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/25

---

Action brought on 3 August 2020 — H&H v EUIPO — Giuliani (Swisse)

(Case T-486/20)

(2020/C 320/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Health and Happiness (H&H) Hong Kong Ltd (Hong Kong, China) (represented by: D. Rose, L. Flascher, Solicitors and N. Saunders, QC)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Giuliani SpA (Milan, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Swisse in the colours red, black and white — European Union trade mark No 3 252 152

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 May 2020 in Case R 2185/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 63(2) and 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 63(2) and 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;

| — | Infringement of Article 146(7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 146(7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 7 in conjunction with Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7 in conjunction with Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2020191EN.01003502.xml

| 8.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/35

---

Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Chiquita Brands v EUIPO — Fyffes International (HOYA)

(Case T-189/20)

(2020/C 191/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Chiquita Brands LLC (Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States) (represented by: W. Pors, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fyffes International Unlimited Company (Dublin, Ireland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark HOYA in colours yellow, blue and black — European Union trade mark No 10 612 166

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 January 2020 in Case R 962/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | grant the applicant’s application for revocation in full; |
| --- | --- |

—

grant the applicant’s application for revocation in full;

| — | order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the full costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the full costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 64(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 64(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of the prohibition of reformatio in peius and Article 71(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the prohibition of reformatio in peius and Article 71(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                                            [BORDERS GROUP LOGO]

                       STATEMENT OF GREGORY P. JOSEFOWICZ,
     CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF BORDERS GROUP, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory P. Josefowicz, certify that the Form 10-K for the year ended January
28, 2006, of Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Borders Group, Inc.

Date: April 5, 2006

/s/ GREGORY P. JOSEFOWICZ
-----------------------------------------------
Gregory P. Josefowicz
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Borders Group, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Borders Group, Inc. and will be retained by Borders Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. Res. 439

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

June 21, 1994.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (S. 24) to reauthorize the independent

4 counsel law for an additional 5 years, and for other pur5 poses. All points of order against the conference report

6 and against its consideration are waived.

Attest:

Clerk.
H. Res. 203

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

June 23, 1993.

Resolved, That during consideration in the Committee of

the Whole House on the State of the Union of the bill (H.R.

2445) making appropriations for energy and water development for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for

other purposes, all points of order against provisions in the

bill for failure to comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are

waived except as follows: beginning on page 35, line 17,

through line 25. No amendment affecting the subject of the

Superconducting Super Collider (other than as part of general reduction of amounts provided in the bill) shall be in

order except one offered by Representative Slattery of Kansas

or a designee. That amendment shall be debatable for one

hour equally divided and controlled by its proponent and an

opponent and shall not be subject to amendment or to a de-
2

HRES 203 EH

mand for division of the question in the House or in the

Committee of the Whole.

Attest:

Clerk.
H. Res. 236

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

March 11, 1994.

Whereas the values of sacrificial love and integrity are fundamental in developing the moral character essential to

maintaining a strong Nation;

Whereas parents by their example of sacrifical love and the

transmission of moral and cultural values play a crucial

and determinant role in the development of youth;

Whereas time has demonstrated that the traditional American family is the most stable and secure environment in

which parents can successfully rear future generations;

Whereas the current breakdown of the traditional American

family is a major factor contributing to the rise of crime,

teen pregnancy, educational failure, substance abuse, and

suicide among our Nation’s youth; and

Whereas it is in the interest of society and government to

adopt policies, that help families stay together by

strengthening and sustaining fathers and mothers in fulfilling their parental roles: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That on Parents Day, July 28, 1994, all

2 private citizens, organizations and governmental and legis3 lative bodies at the local, State and Federal level are en4 couraged in recognize this day through proclamations, ac-
2

HRES 236 EH

1 tivities and educational efforts in the furtherance of rec2 ognizing, uplifting and supporting the role of parents in

3 the rearing of their children.

Attest:

Clerk.