alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.17





 Exhibit 10.17 

PURSUANT TO ITEM 601(B)(10) OF REGULATION S-K, CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND, WHERE APPLICABLE, HAVE BEEN MARKED
“[***],” SUCH REDACTIONS ARE IMMATERIAL AND WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED. 
 AMENDMENT AGREEMENT
NUMBER 1 
 to the Statement of Work dated February 2nd 2018 

(“Amendment”) 
 between 

INNOVIZ Technologies Ltd. (“INNOVIZ”), a corporation duly organised and existing under the laws of Israel, with its domicile at 15 Atir Yeda Street,
Kfar Saba, Israel 
 and 
 MAGNA Electronics Europe
GmbH & Co. OHG (“MAGNA”), a corporation duly organised and existing under the laws of Germany, with its domicile at Kurfürst-Eppstein-Ring 9, 63877 Sailauf, Germany 

(INNOVIZ and MAGNA each a “Party” and jointly “Parties”) 

INTRODUCTION: 
  

	A.	 The Parties entered into a Statement of Work (“SOW”) on 2 February 2018 regarding the
Development Project .“Long Range LiDAR as a key sensor to enable autonomous driving and support diverse ADAS functionality” the customer BMW AG. 


  

	B.	 Article 5 and Article 18 of the SOW provides that changes to the Development Services’ (as defined in the
SOW) and/or to the content of the SOW shall be subject to change management and be made in written form. 


 IT IS AGREED to amend
and supplement, respectively, the Agreement as follows: 
  

	1.	 In deviation of the payment plan in section 10 “Fees and Payment”, [***] as partial sum of the
remaining NRE costs of [***] shall be payable by 15, May 2019 as upfront payment for the following activities: 


 a. [***]

 b. [***] 
 c. [***] 

d. [***] 
 e. [***] 

f. [***] 
 g. [***] 

h. [***] 
 i. [***] 

Further [***] as partial sum of the remaining NRE costs of [***], shall be payable upon delivery of 60 units to Magna’s location in
Tiengen by the 31, August 2019. Delivery costs are to be paid by Innoviz. Innoviz is obliged to deliver these units, on an open book basis and to share all detailed actual costs.  

For reasons of clarity, the amount of [***] will be deducted from the remaining NRE costs of [***]. Hence, the residual amount to be paid after
SOP amounts to [***]. 

  
 1 














	2.	 This Amendment shall form an integral part, and amend and supplement, respectively, the terms and conditions,
of the SOW. Save as explicitly otherwise stated in this Amendment, all terms and provisions of the SOW shall remain in full force and effect. 



Date: May 10, 2019 
 INNOVIZ Technologies Ltd. 

 
 



 
  

					
	MAGNA Electronics Europe GmbH & Co. OHG	 		  	
			
	 /s/ Rainer Bruns
	 		  	 /s/ Ulla Euler

	Name: Rainer Bruns	 		  	Name: Ulla Euler


  
 2
1/)UJ 

.WoW 

cucu 

cucu 

..c.c 

(I) (I) 

00 

00 ~N I I 

00 ~N 111111 

111111 

MM 

! 

'v 

I'll 

\A ~ ,, ~ ;(.) 

I'll Q 

17t1-::l " 

C) 0 ~ ~ J1 

:iltl ~ 1'\ n, 

(1;:1 ' 1"'11£:) '- ~ ~ ~~----~~~~~~~4r-4 !I 

r 
~ 

t> ~ ~ ~ ~ f \II p 

~~, 

\\') ~ "" 7 

D 

l1r ""' .......... "" 

~ 

. j· IS'- :t1 '\ ~ g "0 ;() 

1"11 Q 

I'\ 

~~ 

"V')\ ~ iltl::l ~ g \:\) 0 0 "" e ~ 0"'t) ~ "' ~ ~ L-J ~ ~"1' 

" ~ w ~ , en 

f?~ 

:a~ 

\) Cl) ~ Cl) .:j 1:: 

} ~ :.c 

() ' , en :3 )0 -. )0 •N ~ ' I 

JO 

CJ3..L IV3(-I •N 

'ciJS" 

un 

1111 

JM 

I r~\J\) 

' ~ \-:'\]Of ~" ' ~ 

®~ p ...... (!;::- ~ " r::v I)" ,.._ ~ CTI 

~I) ~ ,>'\) u 1/ArVS., I II E.A!I r nj ~ a S"r:ALI<. .. .._../ 
, II) 

~olo:l 

LJCI) 

LJ CD 

:.c 

, II) (!\ )0 ('. 

)0 AJ 

•N c. 

I I bQ 

)0 ~ •N 

un ~ un 

JCW) 

I ~
NO. 12-15-00126-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF T. W.,

C. W., JR., W. W., S. W. AND D. W.,

CHILDREN

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 392ND 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

On May 8, 2015, D.G.M. filed a pro se “Notice of Partial Appeal” complaining of the 

trial court’s order striking the intervenor (D.G.M.) and his pleadings without prejudice. On May 

20, 2015, this court notified D.G.M., pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.2 and 

42.3, that the information received in this appeal does not contain a final judgment or other 

appealable order. See Metromedia Long Distance, Inc. v. Hughes, 810 S.W.2d 494, 499 (Tex. 

App.–San Antonio 1991, writ denied) (recognizing order dismissing or striking petition in 

intervention may not be appealed by intervenor before entry of final judgment). D.G.M. was 

further informed that the appeal would be dismissed if the information received in the appeal was 

not amended on or before June 19, 2015, to show the jurisdiction of this court. The deadline for 

amendment has passed, and D.G.M. has not shown the jurisdiction of this court. Accordingly, 

the appeal is dismissed, as to D.G.M. only, for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.2, 

42.3.

Opinion delivered July 8, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JULY 8, 2015

NO. 12-15-00126-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T. W., C. W., JR., W. W., S. W. AND D. W., CHILDREN

Appeal from the 392nd District Court 

of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. FAM 15-0010-392)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal 

as to D.G.M. only, and that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction as to D.G.M. only; 

and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 849 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 849

   To amend title 1 of the United States Code to define the type of 
adjournment that prevents the return of a bill by the President, and to 
 authorize the Clerk of the House of Representatives and the Secretary 
 of the Senate to receive bills returned by the President at any time 
              their respective Houses are not in session.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1993

 Mr. Derrick introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly 
              to the Committees on the Judiciary and Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 1 of the United States Code to define the type of 
adjournment that prevents the return of a bill by the President, and to 
 authorize the Clerk of the House of Representatives and the Secretary 
 of the Senate to receive bills returned by the President at any time 
              their respective Houses are not in session.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 1, UNITED STATES CODE.

    Chapter 2 of title 1 of the United States Code is amended by 
inserting at the end thereof the following new section:
``Sec. 115. Adjournment preventing return of bill; Clerk of the House 
              of Representatives and Secretary of the Senate authorized 
              to receive bills returned when their respective Houses 
              not in session
    ``(a) No adjournment of either House of Congress, other than an 
adjournment sine die to end a Congress, prevents the return of a bill 
by the President.
    ``(b) The Clerk of the House of Representatives and the Secretary 
of the Senate are authorized to receive bills returned by the President 
at any time their respective Houses are not in session.''.

SEC. 2. CLERICAL AMENDMENT.

    The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 2 of title 1 of 
the United States Code is amended by adding at the end the following 
new item:

``115. Adjournment preventing return of bill; Clerk of the House of 
                            Representatives and Secretary of the Senate 
                            authorized to receive bills returned when 
                            their respective Houses not in session.''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 145 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 145

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 31, 1993.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. 
Res. 64) setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government 
for the fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998. All points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The 
conference report shall be considered as read. The conference report shall be 
debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget.
    Sec. 2. The chairman of the Committee on the Budget may submit for printing 
in the Congressional Record not later than April 1, 1993, the allocations 
required by section 602(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. The 
allocations so submitted shall be considered to be the allocations otherwise 
required to be included in the joint explanatory statement of the managers on 
the conference report to accompany a concurrent resolution on the budget.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 GLADYS CORLISS,

3 Plaintiff-Appellant,

4 v. No. 32,368 

5 LARRY BOND,

6 Defendant-Appellee.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF QUAY COUNTY

8 Albert Mitchell, District Judge

9 Gladys L. Corliss

10 Tucumcari, NM

11 Pro Se Appellant

12 Larry Bond

13 Tucumcari, NM

14 Pro Se Appellee

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION

16 FRY, Judge.

17 Plaintiff-Appellant Gladys Corliss (Plaintiff) appeals from the district court’s

18 resolution of the underlying civil proceedings. We issued a notice of proposed

19 summary disposition proposing to affirm in most respects, but to reverse as to the
2

1 scope of the order prohibiting Plaintiff from filing unsupervised pleadings. Plaintiff

2 has filed a memorandum in opposition. After due consideration, we remain

3 unpersuaded.

4 We previously set forth our analysis relative to the merits of the various issues

5 suggested by the docketing statement. In the lengthy memorandum in opposition, we

6 understand Plaintiff to continue to raise the same assertions of error. However, we

7 discern nothing new in the memorandum in opposition in the way of persuasive

8 authority or argument. We therefore adhere to our prior assessment with respect to

9 all issues. 

10 The only new matter raised in the memorandum in opposition involves

11 Plaintiff’s inclusion of one or more Court of Appeals judges within the scope of her

12 attacks on the integrity of all other judges who have had any involvement with this

13 case. To the extent that these unsupported assertions are suggested as any basis for

14 relief, we reject Plaintiff’s argument.

15 Accordingly, for the reasons previously stated, we reverse with respect to the

16 scope of the order prohibiting Plaintiff from future unsupervised filings in the district

17 courts of this State, and remand for appropriate modification. See State v. Ngo, 2001-

18 NMCA-041, ¶ 25, 130 N.M. 515, 27 P.3d 1002. In all other respects, the district court

19 is affirmed.
3

1 IT IS SO ORDERED.

2 

3 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

4 WE CONCUR:

5 

6 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

7 

8 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THE QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          80,980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,905
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,974)
<INVENTORY>                                     52,461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               199,194
<PP&E>                                         235,057
<DEPRECIATION>                                (51,271)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 697,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          150,863
<BONDS>                                        183,698
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    207,000
<COMMON>                                        94,035
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   697,026
<SALES>                                        235,689
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               235,689
<CGS>                                          117,442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  270,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,299
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (48,384)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,952
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (55,336)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (55,336)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.71)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 FORM 10-KSB OF CSB FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             871
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     17,118
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             216
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               216
<LOANS>                                         29,142
<ALLOWANCE>                                        222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,920
<DEPOSITS>                                      36,906
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                336
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  48,920
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,235
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  956
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    62
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,253
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,533
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,535
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,718
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       72
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,347
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    431
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         299
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       299
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.76
<LOANS-NON>                                        205
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   171
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       39
<RECOVERIES>                                        18
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  222
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               222
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### DIRECTORY PUBLISHING CO., INC. d/b/a East Bank Telephone Directory v. Joseph LeFRERE d/b/a Air Conditioning & Refrigeration.

No. 62709.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 15, 1978.

In re: Joseph LeFrere d/b/a ABC Air Conditioning & Refrigeration applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.
# FLSA Exemption Determination Checklist - Statutory Non-Exemption

                - Title:  FLSA Exemption Determination Checklist - Statutory Non-Exemption 
                - Form #:         GSA5026      
                - Current Revision Date:  11/2017
                - Authority or Regulation: 

PDF versions of forms use Adobe      ReaderTM.      Download Adobe ReaderTM

Search for another form

Print PageEmail Page

Top
#### BADER BROS. VAN LINES, INC. v. Lyne A. CASTELLANO.

No. 38919.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 225 So.2d 439.
PRINTING PROCUREMENT REGULATION, GPO PUBLICATION 305.3, Rev. 2/24

ELECTRONICALLY ISSUED ON February 20, 2024

This document provides a high-level summary of changes included in the revised Printing 

Procurement Regulation. Change bars appear in the publication’s margins to show the 

location of significant revisions.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

• Contractor delivery of excess quantities (over shipment) was updated.

• Bidder’s Mailing List Application (GPO Form 2524) has been replaced with an online 

registration process using Contractor Connect.

• Several clarifications were added for the AbilityOne Socioeconomic Program, 

including further definition of authorities and fair market pricing information.

• The basis of award used for Fixed-Price Indefinite Quantity Contracts was clarified.

• Small Purchase awards up to $5,000 may now be made without competition 

(increased from the previous $2,500 limit).

• Simplified Purchase Agreement (SPA) purchases may now be made up to $5,000 

without competition (increased from the previous $2,500 limit).

• The SPA Modification Form is required to make changes to SPA Work Orders.

• Regional “Offices” was changed to Regional “Teams” throughout.

• Purchase authority for non-competitive purchases was updated from U.S.C. 3304, to 

U.S.C. 6101(b)(2).

• Incoming requisitions are electronic and no longer require time stamping.

• GPO’s database of customers who are authorized by their agency to place orders has 

been replaced with self-certification by the agency on GPO order forms.

• Individual procurements will continue to be posted publicly. It is now optional for 

GPO to create a bid list to proactively send out solicitation notices inviting vendors 

to bid.

• Bids are to be received by e-mail. Bids are not accepted by mail or facsimile.

• IFB solicitations will invite interested parties to attend a virtual bid opening instead 

of opening bids in person.

• The process for handling late bids was revised to address e-mail instead of postal 

mail.

• GPO Form 915 Quality Assurance Random Copies was replaced with current version 

(dated Feb 2016).

• GPO Form 2524 Solicitation Mailing List Application is not in use and was removed.
Exhibit 31.3
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of SkillSoft Public Limited Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Omitted;4.
    
    Omitted;5.
    
    Omitted.
  /s/
Charles E. MoranCharles E. MoranChairman of the Board,President and Chief Executive Officer -29-
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jerry A. Schneider, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Jerry A. Schneider
____________________________
Jerry A. Schneider
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002