alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          17,958
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  544,964
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    156,910
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               953,288
<PP&E>                                         756,111
<DEPRECIATION>                                 121,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,960,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          585,167
<BONDS>                                      1,611,778
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     16,318
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,842,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,960,499
<SALES>                                        344,398
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,926,845
<CGS>                                          247,720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,201,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                71,285
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             136,373
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,813
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,513
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 267

Electing Representative Michael N. Castle of Delaware to the Committee

on Education and Labor; considered and agreed to.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 4, 1993

Mr. MICHEL submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Electing Representative Michael N. Castle of Delaware to

the Committee on Education and Labor; considered and

agreed to.

1 Resolved, That Representative Michael N. Castle of

2 Delaware be, and is hereby, elected to the Committee on

3 Education and Labor.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 679

To restore and increase the deduction for the health insurance costs of

self-employed individuals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 1993

Mr. HOLDEN (for himself, Mr. KOLBE, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mr. EMERSON, and Mr. OLVER) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To restore and increase the deduction for the health

insurance costs of self-employed individuals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS

4 OF SELF-EMPLOYED INDIVIDUALS IN5 CREASED AND MADE PERMANENT.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 162(l)

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special

8 rules for health insurance costs of self-employed individ9 uals) is amended by striking ‘‘25 percent’’ and inserting

10 ‘‘the applicable percentage’’.
2

•HR 679 IH

1 (b) DEDUCTION MADE PERMANENT; APPLICABLE

2 PERCENTAGE.—Paragraph (6) of section 162(l) of such

3 Code is amended to read as follows:

4 ‘‘(6) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE.—For purposes

5 of paragraph (1)—

In the case of taxable

years beginning in The applicable

calendar year: percentage is:

1992, 1993, or 1994 .................................. 25 percent

1995 or 1996 ............................................. 50 percent

1997 or thereafter ..................................... 100 percent.’’

6 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (a) of

7 section 110 of the Tax Extension Act of 1991 is amended

8 by striking paragraph (2).

9 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

11 December 31, 1991.

Æ
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00336

- CV

In re Austin Materials, LLC

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8 (a)

.

Relator ’ s request for emergency relief is also denied.

_______________________ ___________________

Melissa Goodwin , Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Filed: June 17 , 2022
# Official Journal C 247/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.247.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 247 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5517 August 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.247.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 247

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5517 August 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 247/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6645 — Mitsubishi Corporation/Mitsubishi Electric Corporation/Melco de Colombia) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 247/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6645 — Mitsubishi Corporation/Mitsubishi Electric Corporation/Melco de Colombia) (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 247/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2012/C 247/03 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 247/02

Euro exchange rates

2

2012/C 247/03

Euro exchange rates

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 247/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6554 — EADS/STA/EFW JV) (1) | 4 |
| 2012/C 247/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6611 — Arla/Milk Link) (1) | 5 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2012/C 247/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6554 — EADS/STA/EFW JV) (1)

4

2012/C 247/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6611 — Arla/Milk Link) (1)

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 192/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 192 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5129 July 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 192

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5129 July 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | OPINIONS |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2008/C 192/01 | Opinion No 2/2008 on a proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 implementing Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom on the system of the Communities' own resources | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

OPINIONS

Court of Auditors

2008/C 192/01

Opinion No 2/2008 on a proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 implementing Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom on the system of the Communities' own resources

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**EXHIBIT 31**

 

CAREADVANTAGE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 

 

CERTIFICATIONS 

 

I, Dennis J. Mouras, Chief Executive Officer and acting Principal Financial Officer of CareAdvantage, Inc. certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CareAdvantage, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation to the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditorsand the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which could adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 31, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 17 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 17

     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any 
additional revenues resulting from the imposition of, or any change in, 
 any tax or fee should be applied to reducing our Nation's public debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mr. Duncan submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any 
additional revenues resulting from the imposition of, or any change in, 
 any tax or fee should be applied to reducing our Nation's public debt.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
any revenues resulting from the imposition of, or any change in, any 
tax or fee should be applied to reducing our Nation's public debt if 
such imposition or change is pursuant to a law enacted after the date 
that this resolution is adopted.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amendment to the Quarterly Report of Metromedia International Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the
period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated
this 24th day of February, 2004.

| |  | METROMEDIA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.                                                                                                                             
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/HAROLD F. PYLE, IIIHarold F. Pyle, III Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

---

QuickLinks
4/1/2015 

FLOATER TRANCHE RESET RATE FILE LAYOUT 

File Name: FRRYYYYXXX.txt 

Field Name Description Position Length 

Series The Ginnie Mae REMIC Series number formatted as: 

 GNMA-YYYY-XXX Where: GNMA = Ginnie Mae REMIC Identifier  YYYY = REMIC Year of Issuance  XXX = the actual Ginnie Mae deal number NOTE: Hyphens must be included 

1-14 14 Alpha 

GNMLeft j

Tranche Name The alpha/numeric number assigned to the tranche 

underlying the series. 

15-22 8 Alpha 

CUSIP The nine character S&P CUSIP number assigned to the 

tranche. 

23-31 9 Alpha 

Reset Rate The applicable interest rate formula result on the tranche 

on which the interest payment will be made on the next payment date. 

32-45 14 Nume

Right blank

Filler 46-47 2 Payment Date The date on which the P and/or I payments will be made 

for the tranche. The format is YYYYMMDD. 

48-55 8 Nume

Filler 56-57 2 Accrual Period Begins The date from which interest first accrues on the tranche. 

The format is YYYYMMDD. 

58-65 8 Nume

Filler 66-67 2 Accrual Period Ends The date from which interest accrual ends on the tranche. 

The format is YYYYMMDD. 

68-75 8 Nume
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 316 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 316

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 20, 1993.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 51) to provide for the admission of the State of New Columbia into 
the Union. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and the amendment made in order by this resolution 
and shall not exceed three hours equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on the District of Columbia. After 
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 
amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on the District of Columbia now printed in the 
bill, modified by the amendment printed in part 1 of the report of the Committee 
on Rules accompanying this resolution. The committee amendment in the nature of 
a substitute, as modified, shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute, as modified, are 
waived. No amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute, 
as modified, and no other amendment to the bill shall be in order. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 
and report the bill to the House with such amendment as may have been adopted. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### JEHU & THOMAS CLARK *vs.*WILLIAM C. PRITCHETT.

The record entry of a judgment amended in the Court of Appeals.

Writ of Error to the Superior Court of New Castle county.

Tried before the Chancellor and Judges Milligan and Wootten.

*Mr. Bates, jr.,*

assigned as error, that the narr set out a judgment for $485 45, as the foundation of the action; and the judgment here rendered was for $920 28, as a gross sum for the debt, and no part for damages. There was no count for interest.

*Mr. Wales,*for defendant in error,

said the informality, if any, was cured by statute. “ Judgment shall not be reversed for any clerical misprison or defect of form.” (8 *Del. Laws,*67.)

Johns, Chancellor.

The rule, of the English courts on the subject of amendments is, that they may be made by any court having possession of the record, in any matter that tends to the furtherance of justice. Such amendments are not made under the statute of jeofails, but under the general authority of the court. (7 *Term Rep.,*696; *1P. & Duer. Pr.,*601; *Ibid,*301.) Our act of assembly uses the words of the English authorities in allowing amendments tending to the furtherance of justice. It authorizes the court before whom a record is, even after judgment, “to order any amendment that will tend to the furtherance of justice.” (8 *vol.,*67.) Judgment may be amended after error brought. Such judgment may be amended by changing it from “de bonis propris” to “ de bonis testatoris si,” &c., &c. (Dougl., 116; *Burr.,*2730; *Sellon's Prac.,*407.) So if the judgment do not say that the damages *284occasione detentionis debiti were awarded ex assensu suo, it may be amended, though it has been assigned for error. Amendments allowed after argument on error. *(Str.,*786.) After judgment the court below could not amend this judgment, but the record being before this court the judgment may be amended in the respects here excepted to, either under the English practice or under our Constitution and act of assembly.

*Mr.*Bates, *jr.,*for plaintiff.

*Mr.*Bayard, for defendant

The only amendment necessary to perfect this judgment, is to insert the words “by way of damages,” and make the other corresponding alterations.

Judgment.—It is therefore ordered by the Court of Errors and Appeals, that the judgment and decree in the'court below, upon the plea of nul tiel record, be and the same is hereby amended, by striking out the words “to wit, the debt, interestandcosts,” and inserting after the words “ record of the said judgment, ” the words “ and also interest thereon byway of damages,” so that the judgment in that part hereby amended, will be in these words : “ his said debt mentioned in the record of said judgment, and also interest thereon by way of damages.” And it is further ordered by the said court, that the order of the Superior Court, by which it was referred to the prothonotary to ascertain the amount of said judgment, and the amount ascertained by him under said order of reference, as also the several writs of execution, and all proceedings subsequent to said judgment, be and the same are hereby set aside.

Judge Wootten dissented.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 914

AN ACT

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to desscenic rivers system, and for other purposes. tucky as components of the national wild and ignate certain segments of the Red River in Ken-
★

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 914

AN ACT

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate

certain segments of the Red River in Kentucky as components of the national wild and scenic rivers system, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Red River Designation

5 Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 Congress finds that—
2

•HR 914 EH1S

1 (1) the natural, scenic, and recreational quali2 ties of the Red River in Kentucky are unique and ir3 replaceable resources; and

4 (2) the majority of the Red River corridor is

5 within the Red River National Geologic area, which

6 contains sedimentary rock formations unique to

7 Kentucky and the United States, and should there8 fore be preserved for public enjoyment.

9 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF RIVER.

10 Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16

11 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol12 lowing new paragraph:

13 ‘‘( )(A) RED RIVER, KENTUCKY.—The 19.4-mile seg14 ment of the Red River extending from the Highway 746

15 Bridge to the School House Branch, to be administered

16 by the Secretary of Agriculture in the following classes:

17 ‘‘(i) The 9.1-mile segment known as the ‘Upper

18 Gorge’ from the Highway 746 Bridge to Swift Camp

19 Creek, as a wild river. This segment is identified as

20 having the same boundary as the Kentucky Wild

21 River.

22 ‘‘(ii) The 10.3-mile segment known as the

23 ‘Lower Gorge’ from Swift Camp Creek to the School

24 House Branch, as a recreational river.
3

•HR 914 EH1S

1 ‘‘(B) There are authorized to be appropriated such

2 sums as are necessary to carry out this paragraph.’’.

3 SEC. 4. LIMITATION.

4 Nothing in this Act, or in the amendment to the Wild

5 and Scenic Rivers Act made by this Act, shall be construed

6 as authorizing any acquisition of any scenic easement that

7 without the consent of such landowner would affect any

8 regular use of relevant lands that was exercised prior to

9 the acquisition of such easement.

Passed the House of Representatives October 18,

1993.

Attest:

Clerk.