alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 29128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13413]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; NEI Cooperative Agreement (UG1) and Clinical Trial Planning 
Grant (R34) Applications.
    Date: July 13, 2018.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate cooperative agreement 
applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Anne E. Schaffner, Ph.D., Chief, Scientific 
Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye 
Institute, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, MSC 9300, Bethesda, MD 
20892-9300, (301) 451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#55343026153b303c7b3b3c3d7b323a23"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="04656177446a616d2a6a6d6c2a636b72">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; NEI Research Project Grant Applications (R01).
    Date: July 25, 2018.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Brian Hoshaw, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer 
National Eye Institute National Institutes of Health, Division of 
Extramural Research 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, Rockville, MD 
20892, 301-451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e48c8b978c859386a489858d88ca8a8d8cca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="40282f3328213722002d21292c6e2e29286e272f36">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 19, 2018.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-13413 Filed 6-21-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
House Calendar No. 15

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 115

[Report No. 103–26]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendfor other purposes. gency unemployment compensation program, and ment to the bill (H.R. 920) to extend the emerMARCH 4, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 15

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 115

[Report No. 103–26]

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 920)

to extend the emergency unemployment compensation program, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1993

Mr. MOAKLEY from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the

bill (H.R. 920) to extend the emergency unemployment

compensation program, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House, any rule of

3 the House to the contrary notwithstanding, a motion to

4 take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 920) to extend

5 the emergency unemployment compensation program, and

6 for other purposes, with the Senate amendment thereto,

7 and to concur in the Senate amendment. The Senate
2

HRES 115 RH

1 amendment shall be considered as read. The motion shall

2 be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled

3 by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

4 Committee on Ways and Means or their respective des5 ignees. The previous question shall be considered as or6 dered on the motion to final adoption without intervening

7 motion. The motion shall be divided for a separate vote

8 on concurring in section 7 of the Senate amendment, any

9 rule of the House to the contrary notwithstanding.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metromedia International Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated
this 10th day of October, 2003.

| |  | METROMEDIA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.                                                   
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/MARK S. HAUFMark S. Hauf President, Chief Executive Office and Chairman of the
Board

---

QuickLinks
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 821

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility for burial in

national cemeteries to persons who have 20 years of service creditable

for retired pay as members of a reserve component of the Armed Forces.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. BONILLA (for himself and Mr. STENHOLM) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility

for burial in national cemeteries to persons who have

20 years of service creditable for retired pay as members

of a reserve component of the Armed Forces.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR BURIAL IN NATIONAL CEME4 TERIES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2402 of title 38, United

6 States Code, is amended—

7 (1) by redesignating paragraph (6) as para8 graph (7); and
2

•HR 821 IH

1 (2) by adding after paragraph (5) the following

2 new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(6) Any person who at the time of death was entitled

4 to retired pay under chapter 67 of title 10 or would have

5 been entitled to retired pay under that chapter but for

6 the fact that the person was under 60 years of age.’’.

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) Section

8 2301(e) of such title is amended by striking out ‘‘section

9 2402(6)’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘section 2402(7)’’.

10 (2) Section 2306(a)(2) of such title is amended by

11 striking out ‘‘(6)’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘(7)’’.

Æ
March 12, 2015

Mr. Steven R. Mitchell

Producer/Director

eMedia Films – Lake tahoe

P.O. Box 3250 Olympic Valley, CA 96146

Dear Mr. Mitchell:

This letter is to inform you that we are unabl e to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we cannot proce ss your request and what you s hould do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your March 4, 2015, exemption request on behalf of eMedia Films – Lake Tahoe into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0523), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or ar guments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any fu rther, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requi res you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days , we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additiona l time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Nia Daniels Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                           2,405
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                   30,245
<ALLOWANCES>                     1,713
<INVENTORY>                     45,382
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                11,240
<PP&E>                         142,090
<DEPRECIATION>                  94,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 171,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           54,768
<BONDS>                         21,448
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                        800 
<COMMON>                         2,158
<OTHER-SE>                      88,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   171,373
<SALES>                        123,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               156,400
<CGS>                           68,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   89,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                96,523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              (1,475)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (30,912)
<INCOME-TAX>                       300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (31,212)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                   (31,212)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (1.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (1.55)
        


</TABLE>
#### Gilbert William SCHEEL, Appellant, v. ADVANCE MARKETING CONSULTANTS, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 72-279.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 11, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 907 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 907

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate the effect of the 
parental exception to the kidnaping prohibition in cases of kidnapings 
                 in violation of valid custody orders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 1993

  Mr. Owens introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate the effect of the 
parental exception to the kidnaping prohibition in cases of kidnapings 
                 in violation of valid custody orders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 1201(a) of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting ``(unless such 
parent's custody of such minor at the time of the conduct constituting 
the offense is in violation of a court order or decree)'' after 
``except in the case of a minor by the parent thereof''.

                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE CRIMINAL 

PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

:

:

:

:

No. 525

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES 

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 2020, the Honorable Michele K. Santicola, 

Allegheny County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Criminal Procedural Rules 

Committee for a term of six years, commencing January 1, 2021.
#### Marjorie Merriweather POST, Petitioner, v. Bernice LUNNEY and James Lunney, Respondents.

No. 41190.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 14, 1971.

Upon consideration of motion to consolidate, said motion is denied and the petition filed herein is dismissed as being moot since the Court has granted certiorari in Post v. Lunney, case no. 41,077 based on the certificate of the District Court of Appeal dated May 18, 1971, 248 So.2d 504.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and DELKE, JJ., concur.
#### THE STATE *vs.*WILLIAM TURNER.

“ Exporting” a slave means carrying oat for the purpose of sale.

The act entitles the slave to his freedom, but this must be judicially decided, and can. not be tried collaterally.

After a decree of freedom, and pending an appeal, the slave is not a competent witness.

The defendant was indicted for exporting a slave; Daniel Webb. The status of the negro boy was proved, and the fact that Turner, his master, took him out of the State by night, and confined him in a private jail, at Salisbury, from which he escaped. Suit was instituted for his freedom, founded on these facts; and a decree of freedom entered, from which the master took an appeal, which was still pending.

The negro boy was called as a witness and objected to.

*Mr.*Houston.

His freedom is not yet established. The appeal is still pending.

*Attorney Greneral.*

The freedom of the boy is a consequence of the act of exportation, not of the judgment of the court. It requires no judgment to make him free. From the moment it is proved in this case that Daniel Webb was carried over the line, this court will regard him as a free man. No security has been given on the appeal. (Digest, 154.)

*502
      *By the*Court.

The right of appeal, if under the act of 1797, *(Digest,*409,) is without any restriction requiring security for costs; and indeed there was not, under that act any propriety in requiring security for costs, for the master was liable at all events to the costs; and if the appeal is regulated by the Constitution, *(art.*6, § 19,) the qualification imposed on the effect of an appeal without security, has reference only to the further proceeding upon the judgment of the court below; and not to the effect of the judgment appealed from.

A judgment lawfully appealed from, is for the time removed; its force suspended; the consequences flowing from it for the time avoided.

The effect of this judgment, therefore, in establishing Webb’s freedom cannot be, at present, to make him a witness. And that freedom must be established by a judgment—an existing valid judgment on that question. For though the freedom when established, relates to the time of the act which entitled him to his freedom, we do not agree with the argument that this fact can be ascertained collaterally.

The witness was rejected.

The Chief Justice charged as follows:—The indictment is for exporting a slave. Export means to send or carry out of the State, for the purpose of sale, trade or disposition. *(Digest,*153, § 9.)

The State must prove that Dan was a slave; that he was exported by the defendant to Maryland, to be left there, sold or disposed of as a slave.

The true meaning of the term *" export”*in this connection, is the taking or carrying out as an article of trade or merchandize. It is a mercantile term.

If a man carry his slave as a body servant, for his own use, and bring him back, it is not exporting.

Verdict guilty.
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 893

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the possession or transfer

of assault weapons.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 16, 1993

Mr. GUTIERREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

APRIL 12, 1994

Additional sponsors: Mr. RANGEL, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. JOHNSTON

of Florida, Mr. RUSH, Ms. FURSE, Mrs. BYRNE, Mr. SERRANO, Mr.

BLACKWELL, and Mr. CONYERS)

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the

possession or transfer of assault weapons.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION AGAINST POSSESSION OR TRANS4 FER OF ASSAULT WEAPONS.

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 922 of title 18, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow7 ing:
2

•HR 893 SC

1 ‘‘(s)(1)(A) It shall be unlawful for any person to pos2 sess an assault weapon, unless the weapon was lawfully

3 and continuously possessed by the person since before the

4 date of the enactment of this subsection.

5 ‘‘(B) It shall be unlawful for any person to transfer

6 an assault weapon.

7 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any firearm

8 which the Secretary has determined is of a type that is

9 generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily

10 adaptable to sporting purposes.’’.

11 (b) ASSAULT WEAPON DEFINED.—Section 921(a) of

12 such title is amended by adding at the end the following:

13 ‘‘(29) The term ‘assault weapon’ means—

14 ‘‘(A) any repeating firearm which uses a por15 tion of the energy of a firing cartridge to extract the

16 fired cartridge case and chamber the next round,

17 and which requires a separate pull of the trigger to

18 fire each cartridge; and

19 ‘‘(B) any shotgun which contains its ammuni20 tion in a revolving cylinder.’’.

21 (c) PENALTIES.—

22 (1) UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OR TRANSFER OF

23 ASSAULT WEAPON.—Section 924(a)(1)(B) of such

24 title is amended by striking ‘‘or (q)’’ and inserting

25 ‘‘(r), or (s)’’.
3

•HR 893 SC

1 (2) ENHANCED PENALTY FOR POSSESSION OR

2 USE OF ASSAULT WEAPON DURING CRIME OF VIO3 LENCE OR DRUG TRAFFICKING CRIME.—Section

4 924(c)(1) of such title is amended by striking ‘‘and

5 if the firearm is a short-barreled rifle, short-barreled

6 shotgun’’ and inserting ‘‘if the firearm is an assault

7 weapon, a short-barreled rifle, or a short-barreled

8 shotgun,’’.

Æ
#### LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS v. B. D. MOORING.

No. 54253.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 25, 1974.

In re: B. D. Mooring applying for Writs of Certiorari, (Review), Prohibition and Mandamus.

Writ denied. Under the allegations made, no error of law or fact is shown in this contempt proceeding.

s DIXON, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
03/14/201 1 ie:O G FA X 202493514 2 FA A * DM S @|001/00 2



### ' i^PARTMEN T O F U.S . DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N ••;: ; iASPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S , n:;:<t f OPERATIONS WASHINGTON , D C 20! ! MA R1 5 A B : 5 3 I n th e Matte r

o f Donn aDeVaney , FA A Docke t No , CPlOWPOO l 1 DM S No. : FA A 2010-078 5 FAA Region : Wester n Pacifi c Responden t

Judge : Richar dC . Goodwi n MOTIO N T O WITHDRA W COMPLAIN T To : Th e Honorabl e RichardC . Goodwi n an dRespondent ; Th e Regiona l Counse l for th e Western-Pacifi c Region , Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA ) throug h counsel , hereb y file s thi s Motion for Withdrawal o f

th e Complain t

an dseek s dismissa l o f

thi s action . Thi s motio n i s base do n th e fact th e pitrtie s hav e settle dthi s matter , therefore ahearin g i s n o longer required . Respectfull y submitted , NAOM I TSUD A Regional Counse l Ry ; Ada mRunke i Attorne y Rated : MA

R0 2 20: i 

# ^BCEiVE D ^BARIN G DOCKE T03/14/201 1 1G:0 G FA X 202483514 2 FA A * DM S gl002/00 2

CERTIFICAT E O f

SHRVIC R I hereb y certif

y that o n thi s date I hav e sent

b y facsimil e wher e indicate dan d place di n th e Unite dState s mail , postag e prepaid , certifie dmai l —retur n receip t requeste d Complainant' s Motio n t o Withdra w Complaint , addresse da s follows ; ORIGINAL AN D ON

E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n SO O Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W100 0 ONE COP Y Hon . Richar dC . Goodwi n

Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Ave. , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-23 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Facsimile : (202 ) 366-753 6 Donn aR . DeVane y 21 2 Steeplebroo k

Dr . Sprin g Branch , TX 7807 0 Dated : MA

R0 2 201 1



# . 7 Jef f Kamberg(I.ega l Technici ; Offic e o f th e Regional Couns

^ Federal Aviatio n Administratio n Western-Pacifi c Regio n I-awndale , Californi a
Air Monitoring OverviewPresented to Dr. Kenneth OldenPresented by Bruce Lippy, CIH, CSPOperating Engineers National HazmatMost Recent DataAsbestosEPA has collected 442 ambient air samples forasbestos from 16 stations, 27 were above AHERAstandard (6%).EPA and OSHA collected 177 bulk samples, 48were >1% asbestos (27%)IUOE has collected inside cab TEM samples andhas documented levels above AHERA in roughlyone-thirdOne sample was a 0.7 s/cc concentration but allsmall fibers.DioxinEPA collected 4 stations for dioxin onSept. 16thLevels were at or just above the EPAstandard for action (30 year exposure)MetalsOSHA has taken 53 samples of metalsincluding lead, iron oxide, zinc oxide, copperand berylliumAll were below the OSHA PELsIUOE has documented lead in the dustaround 120 ppm and airborne below 5ug/m3IUOE <LOD for cadmium, cobalt, chromium,magnesium, nickel, zinc, and iron oxideVOCsFour OSHA samples exceeded PEL forbenzene at 0.5 ppmSample on 9-22 had a level of 3.2ppmEPA found 30 ppm at ground level in smokeIUOE found benzene in cabs but in ppb levelsIUOE collected four TO15 EPA samples forbroad scan of VOCs (60 cmpds) and foundnearly all <LOD except acetoneCarbon monoxideOSHA took 9 personal samples 1-15ppm, well below the OSHA PELNIOSH reported grab samples for usersof gas powered equipment approachingthe IDLH level.SilicaOSHA collected 40 samples. Most <LODhighest was 50% of PELOSHA collected several on OperatingEngineersFreonFreon has been picked up by severalorganizationsIUOE found it in every cab sampled butin ppb levels.