alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7721

WILLIAM F. ALLEN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EARL FRAZIER, Property Owner; ANN COBERLY,

Renter,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior

District Judge. (CA-98-161)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William F. Allen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Earl Frazier, Ann Coberly,

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William F. Allen, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint as frivolous under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this

appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Allen v. Frazier, No. CA-98-

161 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2009028EN.01S00301.xml

| 4.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
PROGRAM 1424S

-------- ---------------------------------- -------

March 1, 2018 thru February 28, 2019 (option thru 2/2023)

BASIS

ITEM OF

NUMBER ITEM DESCRIPTION AWARD UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST

-------- ---------------------------------- -------

I. PRINTING & BINDING:

 (a) Complete cover

 (1) Makeready and/or Setup 12 $1,300.00 $15,600.00 $650.00 $7,800.00 $564.08 $6,768.96 $750.00 $9,000.00 $500.00 $6,000.00

 (2) Running per 1,000 copies 59 $275.00 $16,225.00 $350.00 $20,650.00 $93.64 $5,524.76 $190.00 $11,210.00 $85.00 $5,015.00

 (b) Text (black ink) - per page

 (1) Makeready and/or Setup 1,937 $16.00 $30,992.00 $20.00 $38,740.00 $18.93 $36,667.41 $22.50 $43,582.50 $15.00 $29,055.00

 (2) Running per 1,000 copies 9,637 $6.75 $65,049.75 $9.20 $88,660.40 $7.01 $67,555.37 $7.50 $72,277.50 $6.00 $57,822.00

 (c) Text (four-color process) - per page

 (1) Makeready and/or Setup 344 $30.00 $10,320.00 $25.00 $8,600.00 $77.39 $26,622.16 $55.00 $18,920.00 $65.00 $22,360.00

 (2) Running per 1,000 copies 1,740 $7.00 $12,180.00 $8.85 $15,399.00 $7.78 $13,537.20 $8.00 $13,920.00 $6.75 $11,745.00

II. ADDITIONAL OPERATIONS: DUE to AA's ONLY

 (a) PDF CONTENT proofs

per trim/page-size unit 72 $3.00 $216.00 $4.00 $288.00 $5.00 $360.00 $20.00 $1,440.00 $0.50 $36.00

 (b) Digital color CONTRACT proofs

per trim/page-size unit 2 $20.00 $40.00 $7.00 $14.00 $12.50 $25.00 $5.00 $10.00 $2.00 $4.00

III. PACKING AND SEALING FOR

DISTRIBUTION:

 (a) Affixing labels & translucent wafer seal to

singles (including cost of mailing

 tab) - each 35,591 $0.08 $2,847.28 $0.15 $5,338.65 $0.045 $1,601.60 $0.08 $2,847.28 $0.06 $2,135.46

 (b) Affixing labels to envelopes

 (including cost of inserting copy(s)

 indicated and printing envelopes) -

 each 19,849 $0.10 $1,984.90 $0.25 $4,962.25 $0.045 $893.21 $0.60 $11,909.40 $0.10 $1,984.90

 (c) Affixing labels to jiffy bags/suitable

 carton (including cost of inserting

 copy(s) indicated) - each 192 $1.00 $192.00 $1.00 $192.00 $2.00 $384.00 $2.00 $384.00 $1.00 $192.00

 (d) Affixing labels to string tied copies

 (including cost of string tying copies

 indicated) - each 5 $2.00 $10.00 $0.75 $3.75 $2.00 $10.00 $1.00 $5.00 $2.00 $10.00

*NOTE* No additional charge will be allowed for polywrap in lieu of wafer $155,656.93 $190,648.05 $159,949.66 $185,505.68 $136,359.36

seals in Item III (a) or kraft envelopes in Item III (b) 3.00% $4,669.71 1.00% $1,906.48 0.00% $0.00 2.00% $3,710.11 0.00% $0.00

$150,987.22 $188,741.57 $159,949.66 $181,795.57 $136,359.36

-------- ---------------------------------- -------

TOTAL

DISCOUNT

NET TOTAL

AWARDED

GATEWAY PRESS, INC.

McDonald & Eudy Printers, 

INC. Publication Printers Corp CURRENT CONTRACTOR

Louisville, KY Temple Hills, MD Denver, CO

Gray Graphics Corp - Capitol 

Heights, MD

GRAY GRAPHICS CORP

Capitol Heights, MD
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, <br><br>against<br><br>Jovanni Cecilio, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Lisa A. Sokoloff, J., at plea, Tamiko A. Amaker, J., at sentencing, Alexander M. Tisch, J., at resentencing), rendered December 12, 2014, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated and unlicensed driving, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Lisa A. Sokoloff, J., at plea, Tamiko A. Amaker, J., at sentencing, Alexander M. Tisch, J., at resentencing), rendered December 12, 2014, dismissed, as moot.</p><p>Defendant pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated (<i>see</i> Vehicle and Traffic Law ยง 1192[2]) and unlicensed driving (<i>see</i> Vehicle and Traffic Law ยง 509[1]), and was sentenced to a conditional discharge, requiring, inter alia, installation of an ignition interlock device for one year. Defendant subsequently admitted to violating the terms of the conditional discharge and waived a hearing on the issue (<i>see </i>CPL 410.70[1]; <i>People v McDevitt</i>, 97 AD3d 1039, 1040 [2012], <i>lv denied </i>20 NY3d 987 [2012]), and, as a result, was resentenced to a one-year extension of the ignition interlock device requirement.</p><p>On appeal, defendant contends that he was improperly resentenced for violating the conditional discharge because the original sentencing court neither pronounced a sentence of a conditional discharge nor specifically stated how long he had to comply with the ignition interlock device requirement. However, inasmuch as defendant has served the resentence imposed, his appeal has been rendered moot (<i>see People v Baker</i>, 100 AD3d 1154, 1155 [2012]; <i>People v Contrano</i>, 274 AD2d 760 [2000]).</p><p>Were we not to dismiss the appeal as moot, we would affirm. The resentencing was based upon defendant's admission that he violated the conditional discharge and hearing waiver (<i>see People v McMillan</i>, 166 AD3d 1231, 1232 [2018]), which admission and waiver are not now challenged. In any event, defendant's contention that he was not informed of the conditional discharge is without merit, since he executed a written acknowledgment of the terms and duration of the conditional discharge at the original sentencing (<i>see</i> CPL 410.10).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur<i><br>Decision Date: November 15, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></i></partyblock>
***Exhibit 13.1******Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of ASML Holding N.V. (the “Company”) for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), Eric Meurice, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and PeterT.F.M. Wennink, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of his knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company./s/ Eric Meurice
# Official Journal C 152A/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 152A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4930 June 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 152A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4930 June 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2006/C 152A/1 | | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2006/C 152A/1

1

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2006/C 152A/2 | Corrigendum to Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/46-47/06 to constitute a reserve of administrators (AD5) with Bulgarian and Romanian citizenship in the fields of European public administration, law, economics and audit (Official Journal of the European Union C 145 A of 21 June 2006) | 3 |
| 2006/C 152A/3 | Corrigendum to Notice of open competitions EPSO/AST/14-15/06 to constitute a reserve of assistants (AST1) with Bulgarian and Romanian citizenship in the secretarial field (Official Journal of the European Union C 145 A of 21 June 2006) | 5 |

Corrigenda

2006/C 152A/2

Corrigendum to Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/46-47/06 to constitute a reserve of administrators (AD5) with Bulgarian and Romanian citizenship in the fields of European public administration, law, economics and audit (Official Journal of the European Union C 145 A of 21 June 2006)

Official Journal of the European Union C 145 A of 21 June 2006

3

2006/C 152A/3

Corrigendum to Notice of open competitions EPSO/AST/14-15/06 to constitute a reserve of assistants (AST1) with Bulgarian and Romanian citizenship in the secretarial field (Official Journal of the European Union C 145 A of 21 June 2006)

Official Journal of the European Union C 145 A of 21 June 2006

5

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Opinion issued April 16, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00859-CV

———————————

MOHAMMAD RAMEEL SHEIKH, Appellant

V.

SCF RC FUNDING IV LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2021-56085

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Mohammad Rameel Sheikh, representing that the parties have 

reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences in this appeal and 
2

the underlying litigation, has filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(a). No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c).

Accordingly, we grant appellant’s agreed motion and dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a); 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Guerra.
# Official Journal L 329/6 De

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 329 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 516 December 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 329

English edition

Legislation

Volume 516 December 2008

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1192/2008 of 17 November 2008 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1192/2008 of 17 November 2008 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code

1

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

*

Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Certification of
CFO





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Frequency Electronics, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan L.
Miller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Alan L.
      Miller
              
              October
      22, 2009Alan L. MillerChief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.




This
certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”).  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.
EX-4.9






 Exhibit 4.9 

SUPPLEMENTAL WARRANT INDENTURE 
 THIS
SUPPLEMENTAL WARRANT INDENTURE dated for reference as of November 7, 2019 
 BETWEEN: 

TRULIEVE CANNABIS CORP., a corporation existing under the laws of British Columbia (the “Corporation”) 

AND: 
 ODYSSEY TRUST COMPANY, a trust
company existing under the laws of Alberta and registered to carry on business in the provinces of British Columbia and Alberta (the “Warrant Agent”) 

WHEREAS: 
  

	A.	 The Corporation and the Warrant Agent are parties to a warrant indenture dated as of June 18, 2019 (the
“Indenture”) which provides for the issuance of up to 1,470,000 Warrants (as defined in the Indenture) subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in the Indenture; and 



 

	B.	 In accordance with Section 8.1(g) of the Indenture, the parties hereto agree to enter into this
Supplemental Warrant Indenture to amend the Indenture to provide for the issuance of additional Warrants, as set forth herein. 


 NOW
THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants herein and such other good and valuable consideration exchanged between the Corporation and the Warrant Agent, the receipt and sufficiency of which is agreed to and acknowledged by each of the
parties, the Corporation and the Warrant Agent covenant and agree as follows: 
  

	1.	 The Indenture shall be amended to increase the maximum number of Warrants created and authorized for issuance
pursuant to Section 2.1 from “1,470,000” to “3,030,000”. 


  

	2.	 The Indenture shall be modified in accordance with this Supplemental Warrant Indenture, and this Supplemental
Warrant Indenture shall form part of the Indenture for all purposes and every Warrantholder (as that term is defined in the Indenture) shall be bound thereby. 



 

	3.	 All capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Supplemental Warrant Indenture shall have the same meanings
ascribed thereto in the Indenture and any references herein to articles, section numbers and paragraphs shall refer to the articles, section numbers and paragraphs in the Indenture. 



 

	4.	 This instrument may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which so executed shall be deemed to be
an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. 


 [Remainder of page
intentionally left blank] 













 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Supplemental Warrant Indenture to be duly executed
as of the day and year first referenced above. 
  

			
	TRULIEVE CANNABIS CORP.


			
		
	By:	 	






			
	 Authorized Signatory



			
	
	ODYSSEY TRUST COMPANY


			
		
	By:	 	






			
	 Authorized Signatory



			
		
	By:	 	






			
	 Authorized Signatory
ELVIS TROTMAN

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 0 2 28

Opinion filed February 6, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Anabelle Dias of Anabelle Dias P.A., Tallahassee , for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits

.

LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
# Official Journal L 296/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 296 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6014 November 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 296

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6014 November 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2015 of 9 November 2017 laying down technical information for the calculation of technical provisions and basic own funds for reporting with reference dates from 30 September 2017 until 30 December 2017 in accordance with Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2015 of 9 November 2017 laying down technical information for the calculation of technical provisions and basic own funds for reporting with reference dates from 30 September 2017 until 30 December 2017 in accordance with Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### BROADWAY *v.*WARDEN OF THE MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

[App. No. 30,

September Term, 1962.]

*Decided November 19, 1962.*

Before Bruñe, C. J., and Henderson, Hammond, Prescott, Horney and Sybert, JJ.

Per Curiam.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Anderson on the petition below, the application for leave to appeal is hereby denied.

*Application denied.*
#### August J. MAILHOS et al. v. Victor OSBON.

No. 7081.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

June 30, 1967.

Walter J. Horrell, Covington, for appellants.

Robert E. Leake, Jr., of Hammett, Leake & Hammett, New Orleans, for appellee.

Before LANDRY, ELLIS, and BAILES, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge.

For the reasons set forth in the case of Mailhos et al. v. Osbon, d/b/a Osbon Electric Contractors et al., 201 So.2d 108 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1967), the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

Affirmed.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 26

To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit putting

the question on final passage of any measure until copies of that measure

have been available to Members for at least one day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. ZELIFF submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

To amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to

prohibit putting the question on final passage of any

measure until copies of that measure have been available

to Members for at least one day.

1 Resolved, That rule XXIII of the Rules of the House

2 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the

3 following new clause:

4 ‘‘10. (a) Except as provided by paragraph (b), it shall

5 not be in order to put the question upon final passage

6 of any bill or resolution until printed copies of that bill

7 or resolution have been available for all Members for at
2

•HRES 26 IH

1 least one calendar day (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and

2 legal holidays).

3 ‘‘(b) Paragraph (a) may be suspended upon the joint

4 request of the Speaker and minority leader based upon

5 a determination of national emergency and an affirmative

6 vote of two-thirds of the Members voting, a quorum being

7 present, to suspend that paragraph for a particular bill

8 or resolution.’’.

Æ
#### GLADNEY v. WARDEN OF THE MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 63,

September Term, 1962.]

*Decided February 15, 1963.*

Before Bruñe, C. J., and Henderson, Hammond, Prescott, Horney, Marbury and Sybert, JJ.

Per Curiam.

For the reasons given by Judge Manley for denying relief below, this application for leave to appeal is hereby denied.