alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 951 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 951

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment of 
   the cemetery plot allowance for veterans eligible for burial in a 
 national cemetery but interred in a State veterans cemetery, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 17, 1993

 Mr. Sangmeister introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment of 
   the cemetery plot allowance for veterans eligible for burial in a 
 national cemetery but interred in a State veterans cemetery, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CEMETERY PLOT ALLOWANCE FOR VETERANS ELIGIBLE FOR BURIAL IN 
              A NATIONAL CEMETERY BUT INTERRED IN A STATE VETERANS 
              CEMETERY.

    Section 2303 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end thereof the following:
    ``(c) In addition to the benefits provided for under section 2302 
of this title and subsection (a) of this section, in the case of a 
veteran who--
            ``(1) is eligible for burial in a national cemetery under 
        section 2402 of this title, and
            ``(2) is buried (without charge for the cost of a plot or 
        interment) in a cemetery, or a section of a cemetery, that (A) 
        is used solely for the interment of persons eligible for burial 
        in a national cemetery, and (B) is owned by a State or by an 
        agency or political subdivision of a State,
the Secretary shall pay to such State, agency, or political subdivision 
the sum of $150 as a plot or interment allowance for such veteran.''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN FEDERAL AID TO STATES VETERANS' CEMETERIES.

    Paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 2408(b) are each amended by 
striking out ``50 percent'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``65 
percent.''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED ELSEWHERE IN THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1998
<CASH>                                          10,063
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,404
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,920
<INVENTORY>                                     79,949
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               157,543
<PP&E>                                         324,713
<DEPRECIATION>                                 129,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 536,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,913
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,248
<OTHER-SE>                                     202,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   536,206
<SALES>                                        255,987
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               255,987
<CGS>                                          144,876
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  217,306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    60
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,030
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,021
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,675
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,925
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,925
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .87
        

</TABLE>
[No. 236-3.

Division Three.

December 22, 1971.]

#### Roger B. Scott, *Appellant,*v. The Department of Labor and Industries, *Respondent.*
Exhibit
99.1










April
      14,
      2009
                                  
                                  Analyst
      Contact:
                                  Christy
      Williamson918-588-7163Media
      Contact:
                                  Brad
      Borror918-588-7582




ONEOK
Partners Declares Quarterly Distribution
 
 TULSA,
Okla. – April 14, 2009 – The board of directors of the general partner of ONEOK
Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) has declared a quarterly cash distribution of $1.08
per unit, effective for the first quarter 2009, resulting in an annualized cash
distribution of $4.32 per unit. The distribution is payable May 15, 2009, to
unitholders of record as of April 30, 2009.
 
 The
distribution is unchanged from the fourth quarter 2008.
 
 ONEOK
Partners has increased its distribution 35 percent since April 2006, when a
subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. became general partner.
  
 ONEOK
Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited
partnerships, and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and
transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier
natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent
and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a
wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy
company, which owns 47.7 percent of the overall partnership interest. ONEOK is
one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy
services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related
services throughout the U.S.
 
 For more
information about ONEOK Partners, L.P., visit the Web site:
www.oneokpartners.com.
 
 Some of
the statements contained and incorporated in this news release are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements relate to
financial adjustments in connection with the accelerated share repurchase
program and other matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements in certain circumstances.
OKS-FD
 
  ###
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 29577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13555]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Justice Department.

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal of the Executive Advisory Board of 
the National Domestic Communications Assistance Center.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, Title 5, United States Code, Appendix, and Title 41 of 
the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, section 101-6.1015, notice is 
hereby given that the Charter of the National Domestic Communications 
Assistance Center (NDCAC) Executive Advisory Board (EAB) has been 
renewed. The Charter is on file with the General Services 
Administration. The Attorney General determined that the NDCAC EAB is 
in the public interest and is necessary in connection with the 
performance of duties of the United States Department of Justice. These 
duties can best be performed through the advice and counsel of this 
group.
    The purpose of the EAB is to provide advice and recommendations to 
the Attorney General or designee, and to the Director of the NDCAC that 
promote public safety and national security by advancing the NDCAC's 
core functions: law enforcement coordination with respect to technical 
capabilities and solutions, technology sharing, industry relations, and 
implementation of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act 
(CALEA). The EAB consists of 15 voting members from Federal, State, 
local and tribal law enforcement agencies. Additionally, there are two 
non-voting members as follows: A federally-employed attorney assigned 
to the NDCAC to serve as a legal advisor to the EAB, and the DOJ Chief 
Privacy Officer or designee to ensure that privacy and civil rights and 
civil liberties issues are fully considered in the EAB's 
recommendations. The EAB is composed of eight State, local, and/or 
tribal representatives and seven federal representatives.
    The EAB functions solely as an advisory body in compliance with the 
provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The Charter has been 
filed in accordance with the provisions of the Act.

Alice Bardney-Boose,
Designated Federal Officer, National Domestic Communication Assistance 
Center, Executive Advisory Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-13555 Filed 6-22-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-02-P
Memorandum to the Docket - Notes from Call with Wade Thomason from United States 

Department of Agriculture Extension at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Date of Conversation: May 26th, 2011

1. Double-Cropping Winter Barley

 Winter barley is almost always double-cropped with soybeans

 Barley is grown October to June - soybeans would be planted the next day in small grain 

stubble

 Most common system--3 crops in 2 years

o barley (October to June), soy (June to November), then the next rotation would 

either be cover crop or fallow, then corn the following year, then barley again

 What are the main factors dictating a farmer's decision to plant winter barley? 

o Profitability—growers think of barley and wheat as winter crops in combination 

with soybeans

o Optimum soybean yields occur with full season (not double cropped); in doublecropping system, barley is harvested June 10-15 whereas wheat is harvested a 

bit later. So soy can be planted earlier when double-cropped with barley, thus 

higher soy yield

o Winter barley in Mid-Atlantic and Southeast goes almost strictly to animal feed—

pigs and poultry are the largest

o Barley is a very common cover crop (grows well without a lot of inputs)

 Is winter barley primarily grown on land that would otherwise remain fallow if winter 

barley wasn't planted?

o Increase in barley acres leads to decrease in full year soybean–probably not 

displacing wheat

o Barley is planted and harvested earlier than wheat

o Is wheat more valuable than barley? Yes, human consumption market

 They don’t grow any spring barley in the Mid Atlantic or Southeast

 Spring barley isn’t double cropped—spring barley is spring planted and summer 

harvested, therefore uses most of the growing season (western regions have a 3-4 

monoth growing season—rest of the time is left fallow, not cropped with another cash 

crop)

2. Barley market

 Is there a difference in the markets for spring and winter barley?

o Not so much difference; the main distinction is between feed barley and malt 

barley. Most barley in the west is intended for malting industry (much higher 

value than feed barley)

o A fair portion of malt barley grown for that purpose doesn’t meet malting 

standards and goes towards feed

o Most of the good malt barley is spring (but there could be trend toward 

increasing winter barley varieties suitable for malting)
#### Evelyn Davis, Executrix of the Estate of Lucile Ames, deceased, Appellant, *v.*Allegheny County Health Department and Department of Building Inspection of the City of Pittsburgh and Harold Cammon and Mrs. Harold Cammon, Appellees.

Argued November 8, 1974,

before Judges Wilkinson, Jr., Ro&ers and Blatt, sitting as a panel of three.

*14
      *Martin Croissant,*for appellant.

*Wayne D. Gerhold,*Special Assistant County Solicitor, with him *Stephen. A. Zappala,*County Solicitor, for appellee, Allegheny County Health Department.

*George J. Zweibel,*for appellees, Harold Cammon and Mrs. Harold Cammon.

December 2, 1974:

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Evelyn Davis, Executrix of the estate of Lucile Ames, has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County dismissing her appeal from a determination of the Allegheny County Health Department that rents of a dwelling owned by Lucile Ames in her lifetime remaining on deposit in an escrow account should be disbursed to a tenant.

The premises in question was certified unfit for human habitation on October 11, 1972, entitling the tenant, a Mr. Harold Cammon, to withhold payment of rent to the landlord but requiring the tenant to deposit the rent in an escrow account pursuant to the “Rent Withholding Act,” Act of January 24,1966, P. L. (1965) 1534, *as amended,*35 P.S. §1700-1. The property continued to be unfit for habitation and so certified on April 13, 1973 and November 15, 1973. On February 9, *151974, after hearing, the County Health Department ordered the escrowed rent to be paid to the tenant as provided by the Act of Assembly just cited. The lower court affirmed.

If we understand the appellant’s brief and argument, she complains first of a denial of due process because “a member of the health department cannot act as administrator and prosecutor.” While employees of the Health Department inspected the property and certified it unfit, the hearing on the issue of these certifications and the disbursement of the rent withheld was not conducted by the inspectors but by a hearing examiner appointed for the purpose. On appeal, a hearing de novo was conducted in the court below. The appellant was represented in both proceedings by counsel. Obviously, the appellant’s rights to due process were fully served throughout these proceedings.

The only other comprehensible argument advanced by the appellant in opposition to the court’s order is based upon the fact that the rent withholding card authorizing deposit of the rents in escrow was by inadvertence issued by the Department to “Mrs. Harold Cammon,” the name used by a woman then (and apparently now) living with Mr. Cammon, who visited the Department’s offices at Mr. Cammon’s request for the purpose of procuring the card. The record establishes that Mr. Cammon was the tenant on the lease, that he occupied the premises, that he supplied the money deposited in escrow, and that “Mrs. Cammon” makes no claim to the fund. The court below properly held that the money belongs to Mr. Cammon.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Borders Group,Inc. of our report dated April 10, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofBorders Group, Inc., included in the 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders of Borders Group, Inc.We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration Statements:(1) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-88805) pertaining to the Borders Group, Inc. 1998Stock Option Plan,(2) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-79559) pertaining to the Borders Group, Inc.Management Stock Purchase Plan, Borders Group, Inc. Stock Option Plan, Borders Group, Inc.Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Borders Group, Inc. Director Stock Plan, Borders Group, Inc.401(k) Plan, and Borders Group, Inc. Savings Plan for Employees Working in Puerto Rico,(3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-114403) pertaining to the Borders Group, Inc. 2004Long-Term Incentive Plan,(4) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-120367) pertaining to the Borders Group, Inc.Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan,(5) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-134847) pertaining to the Borders Group, Inc. 401(k)Plan, and(6) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-141863) pertaining to the registration of commonstock, warrants, subscription rights, debt securities, stock purchase contracts and stockpurchase units of Borders Group, Inc.of our report dated April 10, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofBorders Group, Inc. incorporated herein by reference and our report dated April 10, 2008, withrespect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Borders Group, Inc.included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Borders Group, Inc. for the year ended February 2,2008./s/ Ernst& Young LLP
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

            FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES AND EARNINGS USED IN PER SHARE
                                   COMPUTATION
                        (DOLLARS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED           SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                 JUNE 30,                    JUNE 30,
                                                           --------------------        --------------------
                                                            2001          2000          2001          2000
                                                           ------        ------        ------        ------
<S>                                                        <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>

  The weighted average number of shares of
    Common Stock were as follows ..................        90,000        90,000        90,000        90,000
                                                           ======        ======        ======        ======
</TABLE>

       Income used in the computation of earnings per share were as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED           SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                   JUNE 30,                   JUNE 30,
                                                          ------------------------     -----------------------
                                                             2001           2000          2001         2000
                                                          ---------      ---------     ---------     ---------
<S>                                                       <C>            <C>           <C>           <C>
  CONSOLIDATED

  Net income .......................................      $  30,663      $  25,169     $  53,813     $  48,263

  Dividends paid on preferred stocks ...............           (130)          (130)         (260)         (260)
                                                          ---------      ---------     ---------     ---------
  Income used in per share computation of earnings..      $  30,533      $  25,039     $  53,553     $  48,003
                                                          =========      =========     =========     =========
  Basic and fully dilutive earnings per share ......      $    0.34      $    0.28     $    0.60     $    0.53
                                                          =========      =========     =========     =========
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 80 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 80

   To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out a pilot 
    program to improve the ability of Members of Congress to assist 
          constituents with respect to benefits for veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Gosar, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, and 
 Mrs. Lesko) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out a pilot 
    program to improve the ability of Members of Congress to assist 
          constituents with respect to benefits for veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Phoenix VA Congressional Oversight 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PILOT PROGRAM TO IMPROVE CONSTITUENT SERVICES.

    (a) Pilot Program.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall carry 
out a pilot program to improve the ability of Members of Congress to 
assist constituents pursuant to subsections (b) and (c).
    (b) Congressional Relations Team.--In carrying out the pilot 
program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall establish a dedicated 
congressional relations team at the location specified in subsection 
(d). Such team shall consist of employees of the Department of Veterans 
Affairs whose only duties relate to assisting Members and committees of 
Congress with respect to casework issues at each health care system of 
the Department in such location.
    (c) Use of Space.--Upon request of any Member of Congress from the 
State of the location specified in subsection (d), the Secretary shall 
authorize the Member to use a facility of the Department at such 
location for the purposes of meeting with constituents of the Member.
    (d) Location.--The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program in 
Arizona, including at the Phoenix health care system of the Department.
    (e) Report.--Not later than two years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on 
Veterans' Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate a 
report on the pilot program under subsection (a), including whether the 
Secretary recommends expanding such pilot program.
                                 <all>
```
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 3146 Dir ID: 2014 - NM - 249 - AD