1/2/2014 ID eA Center

1 Date: 3/20/201 3 From: Clive D’Souza and Edward Steinfeld, IDeA Center, University at Buffalo To: Marsha Mazz, U.S. Access Board **RE: Summary analysis of wheelbase measurements**  **on wheeled mobility device**  **s Introduction**  The following memo is a brief analysis of the wheelbase dimension for wheeled mobility devices in t he anthropometry of wheeled mobility database. **Wheelbase Definition**  For the purpose of this analysis, wheelbase is defined as the distance from the center of the primary drive wheel to the center of the caster measured parallel to the floor. The larger of the dimensions measured on the right and left side of the mobility device were considered for the analysis. The sample considered is the analysis of wheelbase is a sub - set comprising 242 the overall sample of 500 wheeled mobility users . Only one set of casters on mid -wheel drive wheelchairs were measured and so these devices are not excluded in the current analysis. Table 1 shows the m inimum, maximum and percentile values of the wheelbase dimension for manual wheelchairs, front - and rear-wheel drive power chairs, 3 - and 4 -wheel electric scooters. 

### Table **1 : Range and percentile values for wheelbase**  **(inches) b** **y mobility device type Mobility Device Type**  **Sample Size**  **(N=242) Min** 

**Value Percentile**  **Max Value**  **5 10**  **25 50**  **75 90**  **95** Manual Wheelchair 158 11.9 14.7 15.1 15.7 16.5 18.3 20.2 20.9 23.9 Power chair - Front wheel drive 40 13.2 13.6 16.4 18.8 20.2 25 27.2 27.9 29.1 Power chair - Rear wheel drive 30 12.2 14.1 15.8 16.6 17.9 19.4 20.7 21.3 21.6 Scooter - 3 wheel 11 28.2 28.2 28.3 30.3 32.4 34.4 36.4 . 36.8 Scooter - 4 wheel 3 33.8 33.8 33.8 33.8 34 . . . 34.5 **Observations:**1/2/2014 ID eA Center

2 1. W heelbase dimensions for manual wheelchairs and rear-wheel drive power chairs were similar to each other but slightly less than the wheelbase for front wheel drive power chairs 2. Both 3 - and 4 - wheeled electric scooters had a larger wheelbase dimensions compa red to manual and power wheelchairs. This sample had just three 4-wheeled scooters which limits detailed comparisons with 3 -wheeled scooters For platforms designed to accommodate wheeled mobility devices, additional space beyond the whe elbase should be provided . It would be very difficult for the occupant to have the powered device come to rest on a platform that is the exact length as its wheelbase or even a few inches more. F ine control (for example less than 1 in. increments) is difficult when operati ng powered wheelchair and scooter devices. T he wheelchair scale we used ha d a leveled surface of length 30 in. long with a bevel of 5 in. each at both ends (i.e., total length of 40 in.). Power wheelchair and scooter users often had trouble getting positioned exactly on the leveled portion of the platform requiring additional time and verbal assistance from an assistant/aide to get properly situated. Larger devices including power wheelchairs would often get positioned with two wheels on the bevel ed ge. We have observed that this causes an uneven weight distribution on the scale and could cause power wheelchairs to tip over when making short quick forward - reverse maneuvers in trying to get positioned on the platform. Including s ome aids to facilitate positioning would be a good idea also , for example, lines on either end with contrasting color and raised ridges at the ends of the level part of the platform. **Recommendations** Based on the data in Ta ble 1 and the observations above , we recommend:

- a minimu m flat surface of 40 in. length for platforms accommodating wheeled mobility devices including scooters

- a minimum flat surface of 33 in. length for platforms accommodating wheeled mobility devices excluding scooters

- aids that can help wheelchair users mount the platform and position their chairs fully on the level surface.