alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          11,125
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                       550
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,113
<PP&E>                                           4,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,239
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,795
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,911
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,665
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,974
<INCOME-TAX>                                       795
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,179
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,179
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23


</TABLE>
261 La. 1051

#### X-L FINANCE COMPANY, Inc. v. Charles COURNS and Leon Taylor.

No. 52463.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 1972.

In re: X-L Finance Company, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 260 So.2d 751.

Writ refused. We find no error of law in the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

TATE and DIXON, JJ.,

dissent, believing that United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Green, 252 La. 227, 210 So.2d 328 (1968) should be reconsidered.

BARHAM, J., not participating.
#### John SCOTT, Appellant, v. George CUMMINGS, Appellee.

No. L-379.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 11, 1970.

Lacy Mahon, Jr., of Mahon & Mahon, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Eugene Loftin, Jacksonville, for appellee.

*450PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a revised final judgment entered by the trial court in a nonjury trial whereby the court’s original judgment in the amount of $960.-00 was increased to $4,000.00.

The case arose out of an assault and battery committed by appellant upon appel-lee when the latter was caught by appellant encroaching upon what appellant appeared to believe were his exclusive conjugal prerogatives. The sole issue presented for our consideration is the trial court’s authority in a nonjury trial to amend an earlier judgment by increasing same. Appellant contends that Rule 1.530 (a), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 31 F.S.A., prohibits the opening of a judgment if one has been entered unless additional testimony is taken. We do not agree with appellant’s interpretation of the cited rule.

Rule 1.530(a), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, is as follows:

> *“Jury and Non-Jury Actions. A*new trial may be granted to all or any of the parties and on all or a part of the issues. On a motion for a rehearing of matters heard without a jury, including summary judgments, the court may open the judgment if one has been entered, take additional testimony and enter, a new judgment.”

The well reasoned revised final judgment recited as the basis for the increased amount of damages that the first final judgment failed to include damages for pain and suffering. The court perceived this failure to have been an error in law which he thought should be rectified by revising the judgment so as to include damages for pain and suffering. We think the trial court’s action is fully authorized by this court’s interpretation of the cited rule in Pensacola Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Costa, Fla.App., 195 So.2d 250, wherein we stated:

> “ * * * In a court action, however, there will be many times when proper relief may be accorded by something far less than actual new trial, such as the taking of additional testimony, the amendment of the findings of fact, conclusions of law, or the judgment.”

An interpretation of the cited rule in a manner consistent with the pronouncements of this court in th.e above case requires af-firmance of the revised final judgment herein.

JOHNSON, C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
#### DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Nick MALTEZO et al., Appellees.

No. FF-391.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 25, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 29, 1977.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., E. Wilson Crump, II, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

David W. Palmer, Crestview, T. Patterson Maney, Shalimar, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This .interlocutory appeal having been found to be without substantial merit, the appeal is DISMISSED.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Ben Harper, Senior Vice President-Finance andSecretary/Treasurer of Friedman Industries, Incorporated, aTexas corporation, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Friedman Industries, Incorporated;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

          b) [intentionally omitted per SEC release 33-8238]

          c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

          d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

          a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: February 14, 2005 /s/  BEN HARPER Senior Vice President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer
TS-EUTM01

Attachment #8

Pt. 2, Sec. B, End

Worker/Occupational Exposure and Envi ronmental Release I nformation on the

New Chemical Substance at Industr ial Sites Controlled by Others
## NUMBER 13

- 2 2

- 00 12 4

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN RE GREAT LAKES INSURANCE SE

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

.



## ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

On March 2 5 , 2022, r elator Great Lakes Insurance SE ( Great Lakes) filed a petition

for writ of mandamus asserting that the trial court abused its discretion by denying Great

Lake’s motion to dismiss the underlying lawsuit b ased on a contractual forum selection

clause. The Court requ ests that the real part ies in interest, Michael L. Hurst

, Phillip R.

Hurst, Jimmy L. Williams, Vivian E. Williams, and Wager & Associates, Inc., or any others

whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought

, file a response to the

petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten ( 10) days from the date of2

this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

28th day of Mar ch , 202 2

.
For GPO Use Only 

Deposit Account (Printing and Binding) Form 4045 

Date received 

Check Only One Action (Establish, Replenish, Refund, or Transfer) New BAC 

Date BAC and Establish a New Deposit Account New Deposit Account Amount $ password sent 

Replenish an Existing Deposit Account to customer

Date DD Form 448-2
 

signed and sent
 

Refund Request on a Deposit Account back to customer
 

Billing Address Code (BAC) 

Billing Address Code (BAC) Replenish Amount $ 

Refund Amount $ 

Transfer Request From BAC To BAC Amount of Transfer $
 

MIPR — (Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request) and acceptance of MIPR attached.
 

(Required for IPAC Funding) 

Agency Location Code (ALC) Business Event Type Code (BETC) 

Treasury Account Symbol (TAS) 

Sub-level Allocation Transfer Agency 

Prefix Code (2) Agency Identifier (3) Identifier (3) 

Beginning Period 

of Availability (4) 

Ending Period of 

Availability (4) 

Availability Type 

Code (1) 

Main Account 

Code (4) 

Sub-Account 

Code (3) 

Update: Change administrator Add a backup administrator 

AGENCY DEPOSIT ACCOUNT ADMINISTRATOR 

Contact information (Administrator or Finance POC) 

Name 

Department or Government Establishment 

Address 

Phone Ext. Fax 

Bureau/Office 

Email 

AGENCY FINANCE POINT-OF-CONTACT INFORMATION 

Name 

Address 

Phone Ext. Fax Email 

LOA or MIPR Information 

(Go to https://www.gpo.gov/docs/default-source/finance-options-pdf-files/sf1-loa.pdf for more information.) 

Additional Information 

I certify that the advanced transfer of funds is authorized by law and necessary to the conduct of official Government business of the above-mentioned 

establishment. I understand that this form authorizes the transfer of funds for the Deposit Account Program and that my Government establishment is 

responsible for ensuring that the funds are available for the fiscal year in which they are obligated with a Standard Form 1. 

Authorizing Signature (must be on file with GPO) Title Date 

IPAC Submit completed form to the Accounts Receivable 

FUNDING & Collections Office at arc@gpo.gov 

For further information regarding Deposit Accounts go to 

https://www.gpo.gov/docs/default-source/forms-standards-pdf-files/

depositacct_form4045_inst.pdf or call 202.512.1189. 

CHECK Mail completed form with check, made payable to the: 

FUNDING U.S. Government Publishing Office 

732 North Capitol Street, NW 

Room B-622, Disbursing Office 

Washington, DC 20401 

Please indicate “Deposit Account” and your BAC on check. 

GPO Form 4045 R. 03/2015
| (1)  | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                       |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. |

| May 6, 2010                                 |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                        |   |
|                                        |   |
| /s/ Michael A. Neal                         |   |
| Michael A. NealChief Executive Officer      |   |
|                                        |   |
| /s/ Jeffrey S. Bornstein                    |   |
| Jeffrey S. BornsteinChief Financial Officer |   |
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40917

 Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE VIRGILIO ZELAYA-RAMIREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-98-CR-244-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Jose Virgilio Zelaya-Ramirez has

moved to withdraw and filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Zelaya-Ramirez has not filed a

response. Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion

to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**Certification
      of CEO and CFO Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10Q of Frawley Corporation (the
      “Company”) for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael P.
      Frawley as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
      hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/Michael
                P. FrawleyName:
            Michael
                P. FrawleyTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
            December
                02, 2008





This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Ronald C. BRUGH and Lora L. Brugh, his wife, Appellants, v. GULF LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. M-185.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 24, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 26, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STEELE v. COMMERCIAL COATING CORPORATION.

No. 38505.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF
ERNST & YOUNG, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-84051, 333-38240, 333-70502, 333-70130 and 333-72416), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 29, 1999 pertaining to the shares issued in conjunction with the acquisition of Knowledge Well Limited and
Knowledge Well Group Limited, on May 31, 2000 pertaining to the shares issued in conjunction with the acquisitions of Learning Productions LLC and the net assets of AES, on September 28, 2001 pertaining to the shares issued in conjunction with the
acquisition of icGlobal, on October 22, 2001 pertaining to the shares issued in conjunction with the acquisition of the assets of IMPAXselling and on October 29, 2001 pertaining to the shares issued in conjunction with the acquisition of SkillScape
Solutions Inc., on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-06409, 333-25245, 333-35745, 333-57031, 333-68499, 333-83927, 333-86861, 333-32380 and 333-46640), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 20, 1996 pertaining to the 1994 Share Option Plan,
on April 16, 1997 pertaining to the 1996 Supplemental Stock Plan and Applied Learning Limited Executive Stock Plan, on September 16, 1997 pertaining to the 1994 Share Option Plan, on June 17, 1998 pertaining to The Forefront Group, Inc. Amended
and Restated 1992 Stock Option Plan, The Forefront Group, Inc. Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan and The Forefront Group, Inc. 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, on December 7, 1998 pertaining to the Amended and Restated
1994 Share Option Plan, on July 28, 1999 pertaining to the Knowledge Well Limited 1998 Share Option Plan and the Knowledge Well Group Limited 1998 Share Option Plan, on September 10, 1999 pertaining to the 1994 Share Option Plan and the 1995
Employee Share Purchase Plan, on March 14, 2000 pertaining to the 1996 Supplemental Stock Plan, on March 14, 2000 pertaining to the 1996 Supplemental Stock Plan and on September 29, 2000 pertaining to the 1994 Share Option Plan and the 1996
Supplemental Stock Plan, of our reports dated January 16, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.





By:

/s/    ERNST & YOUNGErnst & Young





Dublin, Ireland


Date:  March 8th, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERNALLY
PREPARED FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,186
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                       437
<INVENTORY>                                      4,007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,511
<PP&E>                                          13,620
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,219
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,222
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           905
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,739
<SALES>                                          8,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,180
<CGS>                                            5,892
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,657
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    72
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    484
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                484
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       484
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 10.68**

 

**Summary of Executive Bonus Plan**

 

On February 9, 2005, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors adopted an executive bonus planeffective beginning January 1, 2005. Under this executive bonus plan, for each fiscal quarter our eligible executive officers may participate in a bonus pool equaling an aggregate of up to ten percent of any amount by which our adjusted income forthe relevant quarter exceeds our adjusted income for the same quarter of the prior year. For the purposes of the executive bonus plan, “adjusted income” is our aggregate pretax income for the quarter for our core business segment (i.e.,excluding our eCOST.com and OnSale.com segments), less certain costs that will be determined on a quarterly basis by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. The Compensation Committee will allocate amounts to eligible participants basedon factors identified by the Compensation Committee, including the achievement of specified individual performance targets. Currently, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President—Marketing and Executive VicePresident—Enterprise Sales are eligible to participate in this executive bonus plan.****
House Calendar No. 127

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 317

[Report No. 103–385]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reciations, and for other purposes. funding for the resolution of failed savings asso- port to accompany the bill (S. 714) to provide

NOVEMBER 19, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 127

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 317

[Report No. 103–385]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (S. 714) to provide funding for the resolution of failed savings

associations, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 19, 1993

Mr. DERRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (S. 714) to provide funding for the

resolution of failed savings associations, and for other

purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (S. 714) to provide funding for the reso4 lution of failed savings associations, and for other pur5 poses. All points of order against the conference report
2

HRES 317 RH

1 and against its consideration are waived. The conference

2 report shall be considered as read.