56080 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Notices 

Directive 5230.09, Clearance of DoD 

Information for Public Release; E.O. 

12333, as amended, United States 

Intelligence Activities; E.O. 13526, 

Classified National Security 

Information; and NSA/CSS Policy 1–30, 

Review of NSA/CSS Information for 

Public Dissemination. 

PURPOSE(S): 

To maintain records relating to the 

pre-publication review of official NSA/ 

CSS information intended for public 

dissemination. 

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE

SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND

THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES: 

In addition to those disclosures 

generally permitted under 5 U.S.C. 

552a(b) of the Privacy Act of 1974, these 

records contained therein may 

specifically be disclosed outside the 

DoD as a routine use pursuant to 5 

U.S.C. 552a(b)(3) as follows: 

To Federal agencies involved in a 

classification review of information 

containing National Security Agency as 

well as other agency and/or government 

information. 

The DoD ‘Blanket Routine Uses’ 

published at the beginning of the NSA/ 

CSS’s compilation of record systems 

also apply to this record system. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING, 

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

STORAGE: 

Paper records in file folders and 

electronic media. 

RETRIEVABILITY: 

Individual’s name, title of the prepublication document, and the case 

number assigned to the pre-publication 

review request. 

SAFEGUARDS: 

Secured by a series of guarded 

pedestrian gates and checkpoints. 

Access to facilities is limited to securitycleared personnel and escorted visitors 

only. With the facilities themselves, 

access to paper and computer printouts 

are controlled by limited-access 

facilities and lockable containers. 

Access to electronic means is controlled 

by computer password protection. 

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL: 

Records are permanently retained and 

will be transferred to the NSA/CSS 

Archives when no longer needed for 

operations. 

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS: 

Deputy Associate Director for Policy 

and Records, National Security Agency/ 

Central Security Service, 9800 Savage 

Road, Ft. George G. Meade, MD 20755– 

6000. 

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE: 

Individuals seeking to determine 

whether information about themselves 

is contained in this system should 

address written inquiries to the National 

Security Agency/Central Security 

Service, Freedom of Information Act/ 

Privacy Act Office, 9800 Savage Road, 

Suite 6248, Ft. George G. Meade, MD 

20755–6248. 

Written inquiries should contain the 

individual’s full name, address and 

telephone number. 

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: 

Individuals seeking access to 

information about themselves contained 

in this system should address written 

inquiries to the National Security 

Agency/Central Security Service, 

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act 

Office, 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6248, 

Ft. George G. Meade, MD 20755–6248. 

Written inquiries should contain the 

individual’s full name, address and 

telephone number. 

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: 

The NSA/CSS rules for contesting 

contents and appealing initial 

determinations are published at 32 CFR 

part 322 or may be obtained by written 

request addressed to the National 

Security Agency/Central Security 

Service, Freedom of Information Act/ 

Privacy Act Office, 9800 Savage Road, 

Suite 6248, Ft. George G. Meade, MD 

20755–6248. 

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: 

Individuals and other NSA personnel 

involved in the publications review 

process. 

EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: 

None. 

[FR Doc. 2010–22969 Filed 9–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES 

SAFETY BOARD 

Sunshine Act Notice 

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities 

Safety Board. 

ACTION: Notification of Change in 

Meeting Location. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of 

the ‘‘Government in the Sunshine Act’’ 

(5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given 

of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 

Board’s public hearing and meeting. 

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS

ANNOUNCEMENT: 75 FR 43495 (July 26, 

2010). 

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED MEETING

LOCATION: Room 133, Richland Federal 

Building, 825 Jadwin Avenue, Richland, 

Washington 99352. 

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The public 

meeting will now be held at Three 

Rivers Convention Center, 7016 W. 

Grandridge Boulevard, Kennewick, 

Washington 99336, (509) 737–3700. 

TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: Session I: 9 

a.m.–1 p.m., October 7, 2010; Session II: 

5 p.m.–9 p.m., October 7, 2010; Session 

III: 8 a.m.–12 p.m., October 8, 2010. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Brian Grosner, General Manager, 

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 

625 Indiana Avenue, NW., Suite 700, 

Washington, DC 20004–2901, (800) 788– 

4016. This is a toll-free number. 

Dated: September 13, 2010. 

Peter S. Winokur, 

Chairman. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23158 Filed 9–13–10; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3670–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army 

Corps of Engineers 

Intent To Prepare a Draft Programmatic 

Environmental Impact Statement 

(PEIS) for the Development of a MultiDecadal Shoreline Protection Plan, 

Known as the Bogue Banks Beach 

Master Nourishment Plan (Master 

Plan), for the 25-Mile Ocean Shoreline 

of Bogue Banks in Carteret County, NC 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers (USACE), Wilmington 

District, Wilmington Regulatory Field 

Office has received a request for 

Department of the Army authorization, 

pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean 

Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers 

and Harbor Act, from Carteret County to 

develop and implement, under an interlocal agreement between the towns on 

Bogue Banks barrier island, a multidecadal Master Plan that would provide 

ocean shoreline protection to 

approximately 25 miles of beach over a 

minimum period of 30 years. 

DATES: A public scoping meeting for the 

Draft PEIS will be held at Crystal Coast 

Civic Center near the Carteret County 

Community College, located at 3505 

Arendell Street in Morehead City, on 

September 30, 2010 at 6 p.m. Written 

comments will be received until 

October 15, 2010. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Notices 56081 

ADDRESSES: Copies of comments and 

questions regarding scoping of the Draft 

PEIS may be submitted to: U.S. Army 

Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, 

Regulatory Division. Attn: File Number 

2009–0293, 69 Darlington Avenue, 

Wilmington, NC 28403. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Questions about the proposed action 

and Draft PEIS can be directed to Mr. 

Mickey Sugg, Project Manager, 

Wilmington Regulatory Field Office, 

telephone: (910) 251–4811. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1. Project 

Description. As a result of significant 

hurricane activity in the 1990’s, the 

County and many of the municipalities 

on Bogue Banks have implemented 

several interim beach nourishment 

activities in order to curb ocean 

shoreline erosion and to help improve 

protection against future storms. For the 

past 10 years, the County has been in a 

cost share agreement with the USACE, 

currently in the Reconnaissance Study 

phase, to conduct a federal 50-year 

Shore Protection Project for Bogue 

Banks to help sustain the island long 

term. However, with the uncertainties of 

the federal long-term plan, the County 

and the beach municipalities have 

determined the need to reevaluate their 

long-term beach nourishment solutions 

for Bogue Banks. The development of 

the Master Plan will involve review all 

of the previous nourishment efforts and 

current plans and formulation of a 

multi-decadal all inclusive nourishment 

plan for the entire barrier island of 

Bogue Banks. 

The Master Plan and PEIS will 

include a comprehensive review of 

present-day beach conditions, a review 

of Carteret County’s and the USACE’s 

previous beach nourishment/beneficial 

use projects, and the development of a 

multi-decadal plan based on 

volumetric/beach elevation thresholds 

for Fort Macon/Atlantic Beach, Pine 

Knoll Shores, Indian Beach/Salter Path, 

and Emerald Isle. The Master Plan will 

address all anticipated beach 

nourishment/maintenance activities 

including but not limited to; Atlantic 

Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW) dredging 

with concurrent beach disposal, 

beneficial use dredging projects/ 

opportunities, FEMA reimbursement 

projects, and other potential sand 

placement or beach maintenance 

activities (beach bulldozing, etc.). 

Potential sand source locations to be 

evaluated in the Draft PEIS could 

include the Ocean Dredged Material 

Disposal Site (ODMDS) located offshore 

of Beaufort Inlet, the USACE nearshore 

placement area, Bogue Inlet, AIWW 

reaches, preliminary USACE offshore 

borrow locations, previously permitted 

Carteret County offshore borrow 

locations, and upland sources. The 

Master Plan will: (a) Establish 

acceptable ranges of in-situ beach 

volumes and elevations, (b) establish 

beach volumetric and elevation triggers 

for nourishment events, (c) continue a 

basis for FEMA reimbursement 

qualifications, (d) conform to the North 

Carolina Division of Coastal 

Management’s (NCDCM) rules for static 

vegetation line exceptions, and (e) 

establish a programmatic approach 

facilitating the authorization and 

scheduling of Bogue Banks’ 

nourishment/maintenance events. 

Natural resource studies and 

investigations which may be conducted 

in support of the plan formulation 

include: (1) Identification and biological 

characterization of estuarine habitat 

types (salt marsh, shellfish, submerged 

aquatic vegetation) in a defined project 

area using aerial mapping and/or 

groundtruth investigations; (2) preproject monitoring of, and/or use of 

existing data, on threatened and 

endangered species and their associated 

habitats as determined through 

coordination with project stakeholders; 

(3) development and/or implementation 

of project monitoring and mitigation 

plans based on the project impact 

assessment, and 4) the development of 

a cumulative impact assessment. 

2. Issues. There are several potential 

environmental issues that will be 

addressed in the PEIS. Additional issues 

may be identified during the scoping 

process. Issues initially identified as 

potentially significant include: 

a. Potential impacts to marine 

biological resources (benthic organisms, 

passageway for fish and other marine 

life) and Essential Fish Habitat. 

b. Potential impacts to threatened and 

endangered marine mammals, birds, 

fish, and plants. 

c. Potential impacts associated with 

using inlets as a sand source. 

d. Potential impacts to public lands, 

such as adjacent State Parks (Hammocks 

Beach and Forth Macon) and Federal 

lands (Cape Lookout National Seashore). 

e. Potential impacts to Navigation, 

commercial and recreational. 

f. Potential impacts to the long-term 

management. 

g. Potential effects on regional sand 

sources and how it relates to sand 

management practices. 

h. Potential effects of shoreline 

protection. 

i. Potential impacts on public health 

and safety. 

k. Potential impacts to recreational 

and commercial fishing. 

l. The compatibility of the material for 

nourishment. 

m. Potential impacts to cultural 

resources. 

n. Cumulative impacts of past, 

present, and foreseeable future dredging 

and nourishment activities. 

3. Alternatives. Several alternatives 

and sand sources are being considered 

for the development of the management 

plan. These alternatives will be further 

formulated and developed during the 

scoping process and an appropriate 

range of alternatives, including the no 

federal action alternative, will be 

considered in the PEIS. 

4. Scoping Process. A public scoping 

meeting (see DATES) will be held to 

receive public comment and assess 

public concerns regarding the 

appropriate scope and preparation of 

the Draft PEIS. Participation in the 

public meeting by federal, state, and 

local agencies and other interested 

organizations and persons is 

encouraged. 

The USACE will consult with the U.S. 

Fish and Wildlife Service under the 

Endangered Species Act and the Fish 

and Wildlife Coordination Act; with the 

National Marine Fisheries Service under 

the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 

Conservation and Management Act and 

the Endangered Species Act; and with 

the North Carolina State Historic 

Preservation Office under the National 

Historic Preservation Act. The USACE 

will also coordinate with the Bureau of 

Ocean Energy Management, Regulation 

and Enforcement, formerly known as 

Minerals Management Service (MMS), 

to ensure the plan complies with the 

Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

(OCSLA). Additionally, the USACE will 

coordinate the PEIS with the North 

Carolina Division of Water Quality 

(NCDWQ) to assess the potential water 

quality impacts pursuant to Section 401 

of the Clean Water Act, and with the 

North Carolina Division of Coastal 

Management (NCDCM) to determine the 

projects consistency with the Coastal 

Zone Management Act. The USACE will 

closely work with NCDCM and NCDWQ 

in the development of the PEIS to 

ensure the process complies with all 

State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) 

requirements. It is the intention of both 

the USACE and the State of North 

Carolina to consolidate the NEPA and 

SEPA processes thereby eliminating 

duplication. 

6. Availability of the Draft PEIS. The 

Draft PEIS is expected to be published 

and circulated by August 2011. A public 

hearing may be held after the 

publication of the Draft PEIS. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
56082 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Notices 

1 16 U.S.C. 824o(e)(4). 

2 16 U.S.C. 824o(a)(7) and (e)(4). 3 72 FR 33462, June 18, 2007. 

Dated: September 3, 2010. 

S. Kenneth Jolly, 

Chief, Regulatory Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–22708 Filed 9–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3720–58–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. IC10–725E–001] 

Commission Information Collection 

Activities (FERC–725E); Comment 

Request; Submitted for OMB Review 

September 3, 2010. 

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

requirements of section 3507 of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 

U.S.C. 3507, the Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission (Commission or 

FERC) has submitted the information 

collection described below to the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review of the information collection 

requirements. Any interested person 

may file comments directly with OMB 

and should address a copy of those 

comments to the Commission as 

explained below. The Commission 

issued a Notice in the Federal Register 

(75 FR 35002, 6/21/2010) requesting 

public comments. FERC received no 

comments on the FERC–725E and has 

made this notation in its submission to 

OMB. 

DATES: Comments on the collection of 

information are due by October 15, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: Address comments on the 

collection of information to the Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission Desk Officer. Comments to 

Created by OMB should be filed 

electronically, c/o 

oira__submission@omb.eop.gov and 

include the OMB Control Number 1902– 

0246 for reference. The Desk Officer 

may be reached by telephone at 202– 

395–4638. 

A copy of the comments should also 

be sent to the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission and should refer to Docket 

No. IC10–725E–001. Comments may be 

filed either electronically or in paper 

format. Those persons filing 

electronically do not need to make a 

paper filing. Documents filed 

electronically via the Internet must be 

prepared in an acceptable filing format 

and in compliance with the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission 

submission guidelines. Complete filing 

instructions and acceptable filing 

formats are available at http:// 

www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide/ 

electronic-media.asp. To file the 

document electronically, access the 

Commission’s Web site and click on 

Documents & Filing, E–Filing (http:// 

www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp), 

and then follow the instructions for 

each screen. First time users will have 

to establish a user name and password. 

The Commission will send an automatic 

acknowledgement to the sender’s e-mail 

address upon receipt of comments. 

For paper filings, the comments 

should be submitted to the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 

Secretary of the Commission, 888 First 

Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, and 

should refer to Docket No. IC10–725E– 

001. 

Users interested in receiving 

automatic notification of activity in 

FERC Docket Number IC10–725E may 

do so through eSubscription at http:// 

www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ 

esubscription.asp. All comments may be 

viewed, printed or downloaded 

remotely via the Internet through 

FERC’s homepage using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ 

link. For user assistance, contact 

ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov or toll-free 

at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY, contact 

(202) 502–8659. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Ellen Brown 

may be reached by e-mail at 

DataClearance@FERC.gov, by telephone 

at (202) 502–8663, and by fax at (202) 

273–0873. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Action: The Commission is requesting 

a three-year extension of the 

information collected by the FERC–725E 

(OMB Control No. 1902–0246). The 

information is required to implement 

the statutory provisions of section 215 

of the Federal Power Act (FPA) (16 

U.S.C. 824o). Section 215 of the FPA 

buttresses the Commission’s efforts to 

strengthen the reliability of the 

interstate grid through the granting of 

authority to provide for a system of 

mandatory Reliability Standards 

developed by the Electric Reliability 

Organization (ERO). Reliability 

Standards that the ERO proposes to the 

Commission may include Reliability 

Standards that are proposed to the ERO 

by a Regional Entity.1 A Regional Entity 

is an entity that has been approved by 

the Commission to enforce Reliability 

Standards under delegated authority 

from the ERO.2 On June 8, 2008 in an 

adjudicatory order, the Commission 

approved eight regional Reliability 

Standards submitted by the ERO as 

proposed by the Western Electricity 

Coordinating Council (WECC).3

WECC is responsible for coordinating 

and promoting electric system 

reliability. In addition to promoting a 

reliable electric power system in the 

Western Interconnection, WECC 

supports efficient competitive power 

markets, ensures open and nondiscriminatory transmission access 

among members, and provides a forum 

for resolving transmission access 

disputes plus the coordination of 

operating and planning activities of its 

members. WECC and the eight other 

regional reliability councils were 

formed due to a national concern 

regarding the reliability of the 

interconnected bulk power systems, the 

ability to operate these systems without 

widespread failures in electric service 

and the need to foster the preservation 

of reliability through a formal 

organization. The eight regional 

Reliability Standards are translations of 

existing reliability criteria and are now 

binding on the applicable subset of 

users, owners and operators of the Bulk 

Power System in the United States 

portion of the Western Interconnection. 

The Commission’s reporting 

requirements are found in 18 CFR Part 

40. 

The eight Reliability Standards do not 

require responsible entities to file 

information with the Commission. 

However, the standards do require 

responsible entities to file periodic 

reports with WECC and to develop and 

maintain certain information for a 

specified period of time, subject to 

inspection by WECC. Specifically the 

eight Reliability Standards require the 

following: 

WECC–BAL–STD–002–0—balancing 

authorities and reserve sharing groups 

are to submit to WECC quarterly reports 

on operating reserves as well as reports 

after any instance of non-compliance. 

WECC–IRO–STD–006–0— 

transmission operators, balancing 

authorities and loadserving entities are 

to document and report to WECC 

actions taken in response to direction to 

mitigate unscheduled flow. The 

standard also requires transmission 

operators to document required actions 

that are and are not taken by responsible 

entities. 

WECC- PRC–STD–001–1—certain 

transmission operators are to submit to 

WECC annual certifications of 

protective equipment. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES