alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.15



                        ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                        --------------------------------


FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA ("FMC") and JERRY A. SCHNEIDER ("EMPLOYEE")
hereby amend the Employment Agreement ("Agreement") between FMC and EMPLOYEE
dated July 1, 1997 as follows:

1.   Except as specifically modified herein, the Agreement shall remain in full
     force and effect.

2.   Paragraph 4b shall be modified as follows:

     For 1997, EMPLOYEE will have special payment options for incentive
     compensation and may elect one of the following options on or before
     October 31, 1997:

          i)   To receive a guaranteed payment of $100,000 when executive
               payments are made in 1998, or

          ii)  To fully participate in the MBP, without pro-ration, for 1997 and
               receive payment in 1998 based upon actual funding of the MBP, or

          iii) To have FMC purchase EMPLOYEE'S home in Atlanta for its appraised
               value not to exceed $75,000.00 over EMPLOYEE'S total documented
               cost basis.

     If option iii) is selected and selection of option ii) would have generated
     incentive compensation greater than $75,000, EMPLOYEE will be paid the
     difference in stock options.

Written notice of this election must be sent to Human Resources on or before
October 31, 1997.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Addendum to be executed by the
undersigned duly authorized persons as of this 18th day of September, 1997.


FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA


By:      /s/ Ben Lipps                                /s/ Jerry A. Schneider
         -------------                                ----------------------
         Ben J. Lipps, its Chief                      Jerry A. Schneider
         Executive Officer
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 139

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a threefifths vote to adopt any rule reported from the Committee on Rules

disallowing germane amendments to a bill or resolution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1993

Mr. GILCHREST (for himself, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. GINGRICH, Mr. CRANE, Mr.

LIVINGSTON, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. WOLF, Mr. LIGHTFOOT, Mr. RAMSTAD,

Mr. EWING, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. COLLINS

of Georgia Mr. BAKER of California, Mr. BACHUS of Alabama, Mr. ZIMMER, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. HERGER, Mr. RAVENEL, Mr.

WELDON, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. KLUG, Mr.

BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. COBLE, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. SCHAEFER, Mr.

SANTORUM, Mr. KASICH, Mr. REGULA, Mr. KYL, Mr. HASTERT, Mr.

SAXTON, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. CANADY, Mr. EMERSON, Mr. KOLBE,

Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut, Mr. DORNAN and Mr. GALLEGLY) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

require a three-fifths vote to adopt any rule reported

from the Committee on Rules disallowing germane

amendments to a bill or resolution.

1 Resolved, That clause 4 of rule XI of the Rules of

2 the House of Representatives is amended by adding at the

3 end the following new paragraph:
2

•HRES 139 IH

1 ‘‘(e) The affirmative vote of three-fifths of those vot2 ing, a quorum being present, is required to adopt any rule

3 or order reported by the Committee on Rules providing

4 for the consideration of any bill or resolution that limits

5 the right of Members to offer germane amendments filed

6 with the Committee on Rules at least 3 calendar days be7 fore consideration of the bill or resolution that would oth8 erwise be subject to amendment under House rules.’’.

Æ
H. Res. 185

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

May 26, 1993.

Resolved, That Rob Portman of Ohio be, and is hereby,

elected to the following standing committees of the House of

Representatives: the Committee on Government Operations

and the Committee on Small Business.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-165151 on Form S-8 of Colonial Properties Trust of our report dated June 15, 2012 , relating to our audit of the financial statements and supplemental schedule of the Colonial Properties Trust Amended and Restated 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 11-K of the Colonial Properties Trust Amended and Restated 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan for the year ended December 31, 2011 .








/s/ Sellers, Richardson, Holman & West, LLP





Birmingham, Alabama





June 15, 2012
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 15

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to provide certain

qualifications pertaining to service as a Member, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. DORNAN of California submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

provide certain qualifications pertaining to service as a

Member, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That the Rules of the House of Representa2 tives are amended by adding at the end thereof the follow3 ing new rule:

4 ‘‘RULE .

5 ‘‘LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF TERMS OF MEMBERS.

6 ‘‘1. No person may serve any term or portion thereof

7 as a Member if such person has served as a Member for

8 each of the six terms immediately preceding such term.
2

HRES 15 IH

1 ‘‘2. For purposes of this rule, service as a Member

2 in any term which commences before 1993 may not be

3 included in determining the number of terms served.

4 ‘‘3. This rule may only be amended or repealed by

5 a recorded vote.’’.

Æ
#### Henry Cornelious FINN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-131.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 20, 1973.

Robert P. Miller, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Andrew W. Lindsey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs filed herein, the appellant having failed to file his brief in proper person within the thirty days allowed by this Court. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate that reversible error was committed in the trial court. Accordingly, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
| (1)  | The      report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                            |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      registrant. |

| August      3, 2009                                   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                  |   |
|                                                  |   |
| /s/Michael      A. Neal                               |   |
| Michael      A. NealChief      Executive Officer      |   |
|                                                  |   |
| /s/Jeffrey      S. Bornstein                          |   |
| Jeffrey      S. BornsteinChief      Financial Officer |   |

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 12

GTE Northwest Incorporated and Subsidiary
STATEMENT OF THE CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Thousands of Dollars)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Nine Months Ended
                                                                  September 30, 1997
                                                                  ------------------
<S>                                                              <C>
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income from continuing operations                               $          163,289
  Add - Income taxes                                                          90,978
       - Fixed charges                                                        43,295
                                                                  ------------------
Adjusted earnings                                                 $          297,562
                                                                  ==================

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                                $           40,746
  Portion of rent expense
     representing interest                                                     2,549
                                                                  ------------------
Adjusted fixed charges                                            $           43,295
                                                                  ==================




RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                              6.87
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                          UT
<CIK> 0000065350
<NAME> METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                                 US DOLLARS


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                 PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   1,086,139
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                   147,627
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                        200,880
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    2,042,490
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,477,136
<COMMON>                                       66,273
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                     400,200
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            50,709  <F1>
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                517,182
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         100,000  <F2>
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          496,884
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 26,477
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  50,025
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              2,286,568
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               3,477,136
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     203,056
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                0
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    147,737
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    147,737
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        55,319
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              2,800
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 58,119
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       14,115  <F3>
<NET-INCOME>                                   26,493  <F4>
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  26,493
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       10,000  <F5>
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      45,843
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        (13,551)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<FN>

<F1> INCLUDES ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME OF $20,635.
<F2> REPRESENTS TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $100,000.
<F3> INCLUDES AMOUNT FOR TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $1,838.
<F4> AMOUNT IS NET OF INCOME TAX EXPENSE OF $17,511.
<F5> REPRESENTS COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS PAID TO PARENT CORPORATION.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 203 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 56

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 203

                          [Report No. 103-147]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 2445) making 
  appropriations for energy and water development for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 22, 1993

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                  House Calendar No. 56
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 203

                          [Report No. 103-147]

  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 2445) making 
  appropriations for energy and water development for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 1993

    Mr. Frost, from the Committee on Rules, reported the folloiwng 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 2445) making 
  appropriations for energy and water development for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That during consideration in the Committee of the Whole 
House on the State of the Union of the bill (H.R. 2445) making 
appropriations for energy and water development for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes, all points of order 
against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 or 6 
of rule XXI are waived except as follows: beginning on page 35, line 
17, through line 25. No amendment affecting the subject of the 
Superconducting Super Collider (other than as part of general reduction 
of amounts provided in the bill) shall be in order except one offered 
by Representative Slattery of Kansas or a designee. That amendment 
shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by its 
proponent and an opponent and shall not be subject to amendment or to a 
demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of 
the Whole.
```
#### Golda Mae Smith TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Leonard Ray TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11804.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

March 28, 1972.

*154Martin S. Sanders, Jr., Winnfield, for plaintiff-appellant.

John W. King, Winnfield, for defendant-appellee.

Before AYRES, HEARD and HALL, JJ.

AYRES, Judge.

This is an action by plaintiff, Golda Mae Smith Taylor, for a separation from bed and board from defendant, Leonard Ray Taylor, on the grounds that his cruel treatment was of such a nature as to make their living together insupportable in that for six months prior to their separation defendant had continually verbally abused her and accused her of acts of infidelity and unfaithfulness. Defendant denied these allegations, and, by reconvention, demanded a divorce from plaintiff claiming that she was guilty of numerous acts of adultery.

After trial, there was judgment rejecting the demands of both plaintiff and defendant. From this judgment plaintiff appealed. Inasmuch as defendant neither appealed nor answered plaintiff’s appeal, the judgment rejecting his reconventional demand is now final.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in applying the doctrine of comparative rectitude and in failing to grant her a separation because of defendant’s continuous cursing, abusing, and reviling of her as well as committing other acts of cruelty.

Counsel appears to be mistaken as to the basis of the judgment below. In arriving at the decision, the court stated that it was of the opinion “that both parties have failed to make proof required for the relief sought . . . . ” This language clearly indicates that the decision of the trial court was based on a failure of proof, not on comparative rectitude.

Only the uncorroborated testimony of plaintiff supports the position that she was forced by defendant’s cruelty to separate from him. Obviously, the court did not believe her uncorroborated testimony. Plaintiff testified that she had been accused of unfaithfulness and infidelity and had been cursed and abused. To us, the record discloses adequate reasons for discussions between the parties of indiscretions by plaintiff. Other than that defendant “cursed” and “abused” her, there was no testimony that plaintiff had been humiliated, embarrassed, or shocked, or that the language used was so intended or so treated by her.

As noted above, the trial court, after hearing and observing the witnesses as they were testifying, concluded that plaintiff had not established her case to a legal certainty by a clear preponderance of the evidence. We cannot conclude from the record before us that the trial court erred in finding that plaintiff failed to prove her case.

For the reasons assigned above, the judgment is affirmed at plaintiff-appellant’s costs.

Affirmed.
# Official Journal L 35/8 Fe

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 35 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 488 February 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 35

English edition

Legislation

Volume 488 February 2005

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 January 2005 laying down requirements for feed hygiene (1) | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 184/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 January 2005 on Community statistics concerning balance of payments, international trade in services and foreign direct investment | 23 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 January 2005 laying down requirements for feed hygiene (1)

1

*

Regulation (EC) No 184/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 January 2005 on Community statistics concerning balance of payments, international trade in services and foreign direct investment

23

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal L 40I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 040I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6313 February 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 040I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6313 February 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/189 of 12 February 2020 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/190 of 12 February 2020 implementing Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/189 of 12 February 2020 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/190 of 12 February 2020 implementing Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 16

- 00236

- CR

KIHEEM GRANT , Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 278th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 27563

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Kiheem Grant appeals the trial court’s judgment of conviction signed on March
28, 2016. Grant was required to file a notice of appeal within 30 days of the date he was
sentenced in open court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.2(a)(1). His notice of appeal filed o n July
19, 2016 is untimely. We have no jurisdiction of an untimely appeal and this appeal must

be dismissed. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (no appellate
jurisdiction where notice of appeal is untimely). Further, because the trial court’sGrant v. State Page 2

certificate of right of appeal that Grant signed indicates that the underlying criminal case
was a plea bargain case and Grant has no right to appeal, and because it also indicates
that Grant waived his right to appeal, this appeal must be d ismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 25.2(d) (“The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the
right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.”); Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (plea bargain); Monreal v. State , 99 S.W.3d 615,
622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (waiver of appeal).
For the reasons stated, this appeal is dismissed. 1

TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appea l dismissed Opinion delivered and filed July 27, 2016 [CR 25]

1 A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment of this Court is rendered. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review, that petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either the day this Court’s judgment was rendere d or the day the last timely motion for rehearing was overruled by this Court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 68.2(a).
#### William Edwin CONNERY, Petitioner, v. PERDIDO KEY, INC., Respondent.

No. 43356.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 12, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 270 So.2d 390.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.