alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 949 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 949

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the amount of the 
   loan guaranty for loans for the purchase or construction of homes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 17, 1993

 Mr. Sangmeister introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the amount of the 
   loan guaranty for loans for the purchase or construction of homes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF LOAN GUARANTY FOR LOANS FOR THE 
              PURCHASE OR CONSTRUCTION OF HOMES.

    Subparagraphs (A)(i)(IV) and (B) of section 3703(a)(1) of title 38, 
United States Code, are each amended by striking out ``$46,000'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``$50,750.''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 735 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 735

    To amend the United States Housing Act of 1937 to exclude from 
    consideration as family income for purposes of Federal housing 
 assistance programs certain rebates and refunds for the cost of State 
                   property taxes paid through rent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1993

   Mr. Payne of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the United States Housing Act of 1937 to exclude from 
    consideration as family income for purposes of Federal housing 
 assistance programs certain rebates and refunds for the cost of State 
                   property taxes paid through rent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homestead Rebate Exemption Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF PROPERTY TAX REBATES FROM INCOME.

    Section 3(b)(5) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 
1437a(b)(5)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (F), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (G), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(H) any amounts received after January 1, 1993, 
                by the family in the form of refunds or rebates under 
                State or local law for property taxes paid through rent 
                on the dwelling unit of the family.''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1 Certification I, Andrew S. Prince, certify that:  1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of Precision Aerospace Components, Inc. (the
Company);2.

Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.

As the Companys sole certifying
officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(c)

Disclosed in this report any change
in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.

As the Companys sole certifying
officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit
committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):(a)

All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in
the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.  /s/ Andrew S. PrinceAndrew S. PrinceChief Executive Officer Date: March 26 2008
No. 00-924.

#### Simmons *v.*Connecticut.

App. Ct. Conn. Cer-tiorari denied.
# Official Journal C 246/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 246 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6424 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 246

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6424 June 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2021/C 246/01 | Position (EU) No 27/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy Adopted by the Council on 27 May 2021 | 1 |
| 2021/C 246/02 | Statement of Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 27/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy | 340 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2021/C 246/01

Position (EU) No 27/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy Adopted by the Council on 27 May 2021

1

2021/C 246/02

Statement of Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 27/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy

340

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Goodrich Corporation (the Company) for the quarter
ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certifies, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                           
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
expressed in the Report.

Date: August 12, 2003

| |  |                                             
| |  | --------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Marshall O. Larsen                      
| |  |                                             
| |  | Name: Marshall O. Larsen                    
| |  | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  |                                             
| |  | /s/ Ulrich Schmidt                          
| |  |                                             
| |  | Name: Ulrich Schmidt                        
| |  | Title: Executive Vice President and         
| |  | Chief Financial Officer                     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of the written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Goodrich Corporation
and will be retained by Goodrich Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of General Kinetics Incorporated (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I,
      Franco DeBlasio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.











/s/
      Franco DeBlasio


----------------------------------


Franco
      DeBlasio


Chief
      Financial Officer


January
      17, 2006
AP9 R04

- 30

- 92 S: \ FormsLib \ Civil Bureau \ Civil Courts & Post Judg ment \ Post Trial \ Appeal Status Card Revised 01

- 18

- 2013 DATE : FEB. 2 3 , 2015

NOTICE OF APPEALS

ASSIGNMENT OF COURT THE COURT OF APPEALS

TO: 14TH COURT OF APPEALS

From: Deputy Clerk: PHYLLIS WASHI NGTON

Chris Daniel, District Clerk

Harris County, T E X A S

CAUSE : 2013

- 05124B 334TH DISTRICT COURT

VOLUME PAGE OR IMAGE # 63039636

DUE DATE: 03

- 2

- 15 ATTORNEY TBN # 00783581

NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO THE 14 TH

DATE ORDER SIGNED: 10

- 29

- 14

MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL/REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF F ACT ; DATE : FILED NONE

REQUEST TRANSCRIPT DATE FILED NONE

NOTICE OF APPEAL DATE FILED 02

- 20

- 15

NUMBER OF DAYS: ( CLERKS RECORD ) 10

FILE ORDERED : YES NO IMAGED FILED: YES NO

CODES FOR NOTICE OF APPEAL : BC , C, O A

CHRIS DANIEL

Harris County, District Clerk

By: /s/ PHYLLIS WASHINGTON

PHYLLIS WASHINGTON , Deputy

BC NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

BG NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

– GOVERNMENT

C JUDGMENT BEING APPEALED

D

- ACCELERATED APPEAL

OA NO CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED

O CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED (W/NOTICE OF APPEAL )

NA AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL

### JURN7 (NSA#) JUSTICE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FEB 25, 2015(C1)

INT6510 CIVIL CASE INTAKE OPT:

_____ - INT

GENERAL PARTY INQUIRY PAGE: 1 - 1

CASE NUM: 201305124B_ PJN>

__ TRANS NUM:

_________ CURRENT COURT: 334 PUB?

_ CASE TYPE: DAMAGES (OTH) CASE STATUS: ACTIVE

STYLE: VICNRG LLC (A TEXAS LIMITED LIABI VS FCSTONE, LLC

=============================================================================

**** ACTIVE PARTIES ****

PJN PER/CONN COC BAR PERSON NAME PTY ASSOC. ATTY

NUM NUMBER STAT

_ 00004-0001 DEF FCSTONE GROUP INC

_ 00003-0001 DEF FCSTONE TRADING LLC

_ 00002-0001 DEF FCSTONE, LLC

_ 00001-0001 PLT 08014500 VICNRG LLC (A TEXAS LIMITED LI GLASSER, MARK

==> (4) CONNECTION(S) FOUND

1=INACTIVE 2=ATY. INQ. 3=ACT.ENTRY 4=ISS. SERV. 5=DOC. INQ.

6=CASE INQ. 7=BACKWARD 8=FORWARD 9=PTY. ADDR. 10=REFRESH 11=HELP
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007
(the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/  Gerald D. KelferGerald D. KelferPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### Anna A. Phyfe, Plaintiff, *v.*Nettie Cohen, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Special Term,

November, 1911.)

Fraud — Nature and elements of fraud and liability thelrefor — Matters ' of opinion.

A statement that an apartment house can be altered so that a larger income can be obtained from it is a mere expression of opinion and not a fact which will serve as the foundation of a defense by a vendee to an action for the specific performance of a contract to purchase that it was induced by the false and fraudulent misrepresentation of a material fact.

Action for specific performance.

Stoddard *&*Marks, for plaintiff.

Strouse & Strauss, for defendant.

Newburger, J.

This action is brought for specific performance. Plaintiff is the owner of an apartment house on the south side of Fifty-sixth street, about 225 feet eást of Ninth avenue. On the 17th of March, 1910, a contract was entered into between the plaintiff by one Bedell, her agent, with the defendant whereby the plaintiff agreed to sell and the defendant to pur*270chase the premises. The plaintiff at the time being absent from this country, the contract provided that she was to sign a counterpart thereof on or before the 6th of April, 1910. The defendant paid on account of said contract the sum of $100. On the fifth of April the parties met at the office of the attorney for the defendant, and the plaintiff tendered a counterpart of said contract, duly signed and acknowledged, and demanded that the defendant accept the same and pay to the plaintiff the sum of $4,900 provided in said contract to be-paid upon the delivery of the counterpart. The defendant refused to accept the counterpart or to pay the sum demanded on the ground that she was induced to sign the original contract upon certain representations that had been made by the agent • of the plaintiff, which representations, she, the defendant,' claimed to be false and untrue. The representations referred to consisted in statements made by the agent that the apartment house could be altered so that a larger income could be obtained. Conceding that such representations were made, they were mere expressions of opinion, as they related not to existing facts, but to something that was yet to come into existence. It has been repeatedly held that mere expressions of opinion will not vitiate a contract. As was said in Hickey v. Morrell, 102 N. Y. 461: “ Matters of opinion, stated merely as such, will not in general form the ground to a legal charge of fraud.” The statements made by the agent as to the rent were not statements of a fact, but were simply the expression of an opinion as to what might or could be done if the alterations were made. They were not such representations as would warrant this court in holding that the contract was entered into by fraud. Therefore, .judgment is directed for the plaintiff for specific performance.

Judgment for plaintiff.
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Berthel Growth & Income Trust I (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
J. Berthel, Chief Executive Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company Planning, Inc.,
the Trust Advisor of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


March 15, 2003                              /s/  Thomas J. Berthel
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Thomas J. Berthel
                                                 President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Berthel Fisher & Company
                                                 Planning, Inc.
                                                 Trust Advisor
                                                 Berthel Growth & Income Trust I
<PAGE>   1




Exhibit 12

                    GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
        Statement of the Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in Millions)                                     Three Months Ended   Three Months Ended
                                                            March 31, 1999      March 31, 1999 (a)
                                                       ----------------------  ------------------
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
<S>                                                    <C>                     <C>               
  Income from continuing operations                    $                 35.1  $             35.1
  Add   - Income taxes                                                   22.4                22.4
        - Fixed charges                                                  43.7                18.0
                                                       ----------------------  ------------------

Adjusted earnings                                      $                101.2  $             75.5
                                                       ======================  ==================

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                     $                 41.6  $             15.9
  Portion of rent expense
      representing interest                                               2.1                 2.1
                                                       ----------------------  ------------------

Adjusted fixed charges                                 $                 43.7  $             18.0
                                                       ======================  ==================

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                       2.32                4.19
</TABLE>



(a)     Excludes $25.7 million of interest expense associated with commercial
        paper issued by the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, GTE Funding
        Incorporated (GTE Funding), on behalf of GTE's other domestic telephone
        operating subsidiaries. This interest is approximately equal to the
        interest income received by the Company on affiliate notes between GTE
        Funding and such domestic telephone operating subsidiaries. GTE Funding
        provides short-term financing and investment vehicles and cash
        management services for the Company and six other of GTE's domestic
        telephone operating subsidiaries.
#### Joyce WESTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-550.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 6, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.8



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Brigus Gold Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 27, 2013



| | /s/ Jon Legatto                   
| | ----------------------------------
| | Jon LegattoChief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Brigus Gold Corp. and will be retained by Brigus Gold Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.