alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 736 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 736

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
the qualified military benefits received by retired military personnel 
    serving as administrators or instructors in the Junior Reserve 
                       Officers' Training Corps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1993

Mr. Rahall (for himself, Mr. Montgomery, Mr. Gingrich, Mr. Solomon, Mr. 
 Parker, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Lewis of Florida, and Mr. Pickett) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
the qualified military benefits received by retired military personnel 
    serving as administrators or instructors in the Junior Reserve 
                       Officers' Training Corps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FOR QUALIFIED MILITARY BENEFITS RECEIVED BY 
              RETIRED MILITARY PERSONNEL SERVING AS ADMINISTRATORS OR 
              INSTRUCTORS IN JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICERS' TRAINING CORPS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 134 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exclusion for certain military 
benefits) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Retired members serving as administrators or 
        instructors in junior reserve officers' training corps.--This 
        subsection shall be applied without regard to section 
        2031(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 15Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Goodrich Corporation We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and in their related Prospectuses, of our report dated
August 2,
2004, relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial
statements of Goodrich Corporation and subsidiaries which are included in its
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004: RegistrationNumber
    
    Description of Registration Statement
    
    Filing Date33-49052
    
    The B.F.Goodrich Company Key Employees
Stock Option Plan  Form S-8

    
    June 26, 1992333-03293
    
    The B.F.Goodrich Company Stock Option Plan  Form S-8
    
    May 8, 1996333-19697
    
    The B.F.Goodrich Company Savings
Benefit Restoration Plan  Form S-8
    
    January 13, 1997333-53879
    
    Directors Deferred Compensation Plan  Form S-8
    
    May 29, 1998333-53881
    
    Rohr, Inc. 1982 Stock Option Plan,
Rohr, Inc. 1989 Stock Incentive Plan and
Rohr, Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive Plan  Form S-8
    
    May 29, 1998333-76297
    
    Coltec Industries Inc. 1992 Stock
Option Plan
Coltec Industries Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan  Form S-8
    
    April 14, 1999333-77023
    
    The B.F.Goodrich Company Stock Option Plan  Form S-8
    
    April 26, 1999333-60210
    
    The B.F. Goodrich Company Stock Option Plan  Form S-8
    
    May 4, 2001333-60208
    
    The B.F. Goodrich Company Employee
Stock Purchase Plan  Form S-8
    
    May 4, 2001333-98165
    
    Shelf Registration for Debt Securities,
Series Preferred Stock, Common Stock,
Stock Purchase Contracts and Stock
Purchase Units  Form S-3
    
    August 15, 2002333-107866
    
    Goodrich Corporation Employees Savings Plan  Form S-8
    
    August 12, 2003333-107867
    
    Goodrich Corporation Wage
Employees

Savings Plan  Form S-8
    
    August 12, 2003333-107868
    
    Goodrich Corporation Savings Plan for
Rohr Employees  Form S-8
    
    August 12, 2003333-109247
    
    Goodrich Corporation Directors
Deferred Compensation Plan  Form S-8
    
    September 29, 2003Charlotte, North Carolina
August 2, 2004
    
    
    
    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          87,774
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,549,399
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (752,436)
<INVENTORY>                                 12,536,224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,737,619
<PP&E>                                       3,033,811
<DEPRECIATION>                                 913,229
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,613,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,822,148
<BONDS>                                         91,415
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 22,333,000
<COMMON>                                         2,384
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,635,103)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,613,344
<SALES>                                     43,323,222
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,458,631
<CGS>                                       29,927,850
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,927,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,900,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,889,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,258,831)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,202
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,289,033)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,289,033)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (2.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.84)


</TABLE>
#### TENNESSEE GAS PIPE LINE CO. v. ADMINISTRATOR, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY of the State of Louisiana, et al.

No. 61908.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Tennessee Gas Pipe Line Co., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to *1153the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Natchitoches. 356 So.2d 114.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
**EXHIBIT 31.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brandon H. LaVerne, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PC Mall, Inc.; and

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date:   April 29, 2011 | /s/   Brandon H. LaVerne  |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                        | Brandon   H. LaVerne      |
|                        | Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----
AEE-15-2651-E, AEE-15-2652-E, AEE-15-2856-E

August 13, 2015

Mr. Jack Bart

President

Tej-Jet, Inc.

98 Byram Shore Road

Greenwich, CT 06830

Dear Mr. Bart:

This letter responds to your three petitions for exemption dated June 3, 2015, requesting an 

exemption from Title 14 of The Code of Federal Regulations, §91.881, for your (or your 

corporation’s) Morane Saulnier MS-760 airplanes. These letters were docketed as Nos. 

FAA-2015-2343 (Tej-Jet, Inc), FAA-2015-2344 (your personal request) and FAA-2015-2345 

(Tej-Jet of Del LLC). Section 91.881 requires that after December 31, 2015, jet airplanes 

with a maximum takeoff weight of 75,000 pounds or less must meet Stage 3 noise 

requirements to operate in the contiguous United States. 

Section 506 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) prohibits the 

operation of jets weighing less than 75,000 pounds that do not meet Stage 3. The FMRA also 

allows for the limited operation of prohibited jets for certain purposes. These provisions are 

listed in the codified statute at 49 USC 47534, and were adopted in 14 CFR at §§91.881 and 

91.883.

The FAA is unable to grant your request for exemption from §91.881 because we have no 

authority to do so. The statute did not grant the FAA any authority to make exceptions to the 

prohibition other than as specified for limited special flight authorizations for specified 

purposes identified in the law.

You noted that your aircraft was excluded from the FAA’s rulemaking that adopted this 

statutory change. Since the FAA was given no authority to change the statute, our analysis 

conducted at the time was not required by law and was not meant to be comprehensive. It 

was designed to give interested persons and affected operators a sense of the range of aircraft 

subject to the statutory prohibition and the anticipated economic impact for some of the more 

common models in operation. 
2

Accordingly, we are taking no further action on your requests and the dockets for these 

requests are being closed. 

Sincerely,

//s//

Lourdes Maurice

Director, Environment and Energy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          37,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                       905
<INVENTORY>                                     29,492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,952
<PP&E>                                         204,616
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,060,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,733
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           345
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,216,979
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,060,214
<SALES>                                        180,880
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               180,880
<CGS>                                          154,539
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  182,937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (11)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,340
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,386)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,323
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,709)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  18,210
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,501
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
#### Willie UNDERWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-834.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 14, 1971.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Vaughan J. Rudnick, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 99.19



CONSENT OF DMA,
Dan Mackie & Associates



March 27, 2013



Brigus Gold Corp.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission



Re: Brigus Gold Corp.



Ladies and Gentlemen:



We hereby consent to (i) the use of our name in connection with
the following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for
the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Form 40-F”) of Brigus Gold Corp. (the “Company”) to which this consent
relates: (A) the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report, Pre-feasibility Study, Brigus Gold Corp., Goldfields
Project, Saskatchewan, Canada” dated effective October 6, 2011 (the “Report”), (B) the Company’s Annual
Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2012 and (C) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for
the year ended December 31, 2012, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report in the
Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-113889, 333-162558 and 333-167757), as amended, and Form F-10 (File No. 333-174604),
as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses
or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to us included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced
Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.



|Sincerely,                   |                  
|---------------------------- | -----------------
|                             |                  
|DMA, Dan Mackie & Associates |                  
|                             |                  
|/s/ Dan Mackie               |                  
|Name:                        | Dan Mackie       
|Title:                       | Authorized person
To Whom it May Concern: 

I would like to inform the FAA that Frank Esposito Esq will not longer be acting as legal counselor for AeroCine LLC. All 

correspondence from this point forth should be sent directly to brianstreem@gmail.com. 

Thank you, 

Brian Streem 

AeroCine LLC 

201.317.8784 

AeroCine LLC 

405 Douglass St Suite 2 

Brooklyn, NY 11217 

September 10th, 2014 

201.317.8784

AeroCine LLC 

405 Douglass St Suite 2 

Brooklyn, NY 11217
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                                   FORM 10-Q/A


(Mark One)

 X    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
---   EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2000
                               -------------------

                                       OR

      TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
---   EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ----------------- to --------------


Commission        Registrant, State of Incorporation,     I.R.S. Employer
File Number       Address and Telephone Number            Identification No.
-----------       -----------------------------------     ------------------

1-6047            GPU, Inc.                                 13-5516989
                  (a Pennsylvania corporation)
                  300 Madison Avenue
                  Morristown, New Jersey 07962-1911
                  Telephone (973) 401-8200


      Indicate by check mark  whether the  registrant  (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934  during  the  preceding  12 months  (or for such  shorter  period  that the
registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X    No
                                             ---    ----

      The number of shares  outstanding of each of the  registrant's  classes of
voting stock, as of October 31, 2000, was as follows:
                                                                   Shares
Registrant      Title                                           Outstanding
----------      -----                                           -----------

GPU, Inc.       Common Stock, $2.50 par value                   121,338,841


<PAGE>


GPU, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies



      GPU, Inc.  hereby amends its quarterly  report filed on Form 10-Q, for the
period  ending  September  30,  2000,  by  amending  Exhibit  12A thereof in its
entirety and replacing it with the attached Exhibit 12A.




                                             1

<PAGE>


GPU, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies



                                   Signatures

      Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.




                                    GPU, INC.



November 13, 2000                By:  /s/ B. L. Levy
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    B. L. Levy, Senior Vice President
                                    and Chief Financial Officer



November 13, 2000                By:  /s/ P. E. Maricondo
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    P. E. Maricondo, Vice President
                                    and Comptroller




                                             2
DATES OF INSERTION . SIGNATUREE AGENCY

Monday, October 15, 2007

You, as vendor, are authorized to publish this advertisement n ‘our newspaper, subject to the terms of this order, as

follows: Advertisement to be published in regular advertising columns, no position specified; caption of two lines and signature

to be in capitals and subject matter and title of officer be set solid in type regularly used (legal)

nitic advertisirjg charge. to be mddi bt the rate charged to and pdld by c.ommercial jd,ertisers for matter Irnildriy set drlcf

• occupying similar space; advertisement to be run in the editions specified above. Vendor agrees that, ri the performance of any

contract awarded to it hereunder, said vendor will not discriminate against any employe &rother persons on account of race, color,

sex, religious creed, ancestry, age or national origin and that the Comrnonwatth, upon receipt of satisfactory evidence of suchdiscrirñination. shall have the right tocaricel said contract. Return this copy at once if you will not accept this advertisement under the termsset forth. . .

Proof of advertising in the form of a tearsheet must be included on Parts 1,2 & 3. Return original and two copies (signed

by the editor or publisher) to Agency listed above. Part 1 must be notarized. Part 4 is yours.

Commonwealth to be billed only for actual number of printed lines published.

DP APP IEAR LDr.[ ORG COSTFUNCTkF — — — ——_____________ 

INVOICE (To be completed by pub!isher): . -- -•••-•—•--——— ———••.- —

.‘\C hr’s pr DAThOFINSER1Ir,N CrUAL NO IECUr1 . C0P!X 1GrALAMOJNT

istAd

. OI 2o() O 0C)

2ndAd

. ... .. .:

I

3rdAd cc6L . :.

GRAND TOTAL- \‘7 SO

PASTE TEARSHEET HERE

Compoiiweaft f Pennsylvania

County of -‘f\’ cI F, (\ — fV\ Before me, the subscriber, a Notary Public in and for said County, persqnally came .--.--‘ V...t ii’ r

who hdulv sworn, dbQi depose nd say thatie Sw CSSi ñ(. 

the L\JL (\AOC k a general newspaper ublished at —____

that the advertisement, of which tearsheet is attached hereto, was published in the regular advertising columhs of said newspaper,

in the editions of said newspaper, in all respects as ordered and itivoiced above; arid that the Commonwealth is not charged

therefor at a rate higher than is charged any ordinary commercial advertiser for a similar amount of matter occupying similar space.and set in a similar manner, in said newspaper. . . . ....

. .

....

C I’

Nc) rAI(l PULJC Natr.a. Seal .

My commission expires lc

This affidavit must be made by the Owner, Publisher, or the designated agent of the owner or pubIish__ Dec. 6,20GB .

R,, 14lV5fld Shflfl Of NQtI

ACCOCNT FUND

(r

OBJ AMOUNT

2. COMPTROLLER
508 Compliance Training

Section 508 training courses are available to Federal 

employees through the Institute at GPO. Courses 

available now include: 

■ 508 Compliance with Adobe Acrobat & MS Word for 

Federal Publishers (3 days)

■ 508 with Fillable Forms for Federal Publishers (2 days)

■ 508 with Adobe InDesign for Federal Publishers 

(3 days)

■ Managing 508 Compliance Workflow for Federal 

Publishers (1 day)

To view courses and register: 

https://www.gpo.gov/customers/theinstitute.htm

508 Compliance Consulting

GPO solutions offer professional assessment and 

consultation services from vendor-neutral industry 

experts. Section 508 consulting services include:

■ Evaluation of your agency’s current level of 

compliance

■ Cost estimates for services needed to meet 

Section 508 requirements

■ Development of Section 508 compliance SOPs 

for your agency

■ Guidance on Section 508 responsibilities and 

standards

■ Identification of staff training needs

508 Compliance Contract Vehicles

GPO offers contracts that provide for:

■ The creation, remediation, and distribution of Section 

508 compliant PDF files from legacy documents or 

electronic files

■ 508 accessibility for fillable PDF’s using Adobe 

LiveCycle

■ An assessment review on how to make a file 

508 compliant

The U.S. Access Board* has ruled 

that Federal agencies covered by 

Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act 

of 1973 have a deadline of January 

18, 2018, to comply. Accessibility 

standards ensure that information 

and communication technology 

is available to and usable by 

individuals with disabilities.

GPO offers a variety of solutions to 

Federal agencies to meet Section 

508 Standards.

To learn more about consulting options and procurement vehicles available to your agency 

contact the GPO National Account Managers (NAMS) directly at 202.512.1904 or email 

NAM@gpo.gov

*https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/communications-and-it/about-the-ict-refresh/final-rule

GPO Solutions Complying with Section 508
261 La. 1067

#### Elisha HALL Sr. v. Austin F. AKIN.

No. 52491.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 1972.

In re: Austin F. Akin applying for cer-tiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Bossier. 260 So.2d 822.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.