alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Howard S. Modlin, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, and I, William G. Henry, Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer, each of General
DataComm Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), do each hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:
 
 (1) The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended  June 30, 2009 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 This Certification accompanies this Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officer.
 
 
 /s/ Howard S. ModlinDate:    August 14, 2009
Howard S. Modlin,Chairman of the Board, President andChief Executive Officer/s/ William G. HenryWilliam G. HenryVice President, Finance and Administrationand Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal C 219A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.219.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 219A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5631 July 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.219.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 219A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5631 July 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 219A/01 | European Data Protection Supervisor — Publication of a vacancy notice for the positions of European Data Protection Supervisor and Assistant Supervisor — COM/2013/10338 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2013/C 219A/01

European Data Protection Supervisor — Publication of a vacancy notice for the positions of European Data Protection Supervisor and Assistant Supervisor — COM/2013/10338

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 117 | (ET) |
| 118 | |
| 120 | |
| 131 | |
| 143 | |
| 160 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 162 | |
| 166 | |
| 167 | |
| 168 | |
| 172 | |
| 173 | |
| 174 | |
| 176 | (BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |
| 180 | (MT) |
| 182 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 183 | (IT) |
| 191 | |
| 192 | |
| 193 | |
| 194 | |
| 196 | |
| 197 | |
| 199 | |
| 200 | |
| 204 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 210 | (LV) |
| 211 | (PL) |
| 219 | |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

112

(DE/EN/FR)

117

(ET)

118

120

131

143

160

(DE/EN/FR)

162

166

167

168

172

173

174

176

(BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

180

(MT)

182

(DE/EN/FR)

183

(IT)

191

192

193

194

196

197

199

200

204

(DE/EN/FR)

210

(LV)

211

(PL)

219

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**EXHIBIT 31.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brandon H. LaVerne,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed thisAmendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PC Mall, Inc.;and

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date: April 30, 2010 | /s/ Brandon H. LaVerne  |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|
|                      | Brandon H. LaVerne      |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6412

THOMAS RAND, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

ANTHONY J. PADULA, Warden of Lee Correctional Institution, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. 

(3:08-cv-00907-HFF) 

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 2, 2009 

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit 

Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Thomas Rand, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, Melody Jane Brown, Assistant 

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Thomas Rand seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) 

(2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El 

v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Rand has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny Rand’s motion for appointment of counsel 

and for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE JESUS SALGADO

- FRANCO,

Petitioner,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 13

- 74364 Agency No. A075

- 090

- 469

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted December 14, 2016 ** San Francisco, California Before: HAWKINS, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. Jose Jesus Salgado

- Franco, a Mexican citizen, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals ’ (“BIA” ) decision dismissing his appeal and affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his request for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 19 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

le gal de terminations regarding an indi vidual’s eligibility for cancellation of removal, Montero

–

Martinez v. Ashcroft , 277 F.3d 1137, 1145 (9th Cir. 2002), and we review factual findings for substantial evidence, Ali v. Holder , 637 F.3d 1025,
1028

– 29 (9th Cir. 2011). We deny Salgado

- Franco’s pe tition for review.
1. The BIA properly determined that Salgado

- Franco was ineligible for
cancellation of removal because his deportation was previously suspended

. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(c)(6). Although Salgado

- Franco argues that he had obtained suspension o f deportation relief as a derivative of his mother’ s application , reasonable and substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Salgado

Franco received this relief independent of his mother’s claim. The record shows that Salgado

- Franco had completed his own application for suspension of deportation. In his application, Salgado

- Franco described the extreme hardship that he would personally suffer if deported to Mexico; the hardship described was not necessarily dependent on the success of his mother’s application

. Because Salgado

Franco previously received suspension of deportation relief , under § 1229b(c)(6), he is not eligible for cancellation of removal. See Garcia

- Jimenez v. Gonzales , 488 F.3d 1082, 1085 (9th Cir. 2007)

. 2. We lack jurisdiction to review Salgado

- Franco’s contention that he3

remains eligible for cancellation of removal because he was granted suspension of deportation relief af

ter September 30, 1996, because he failed to exhaust this claim
before the BIA. Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004)

. PETITION DENIED.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      Exhibit 12




                     GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY
        Statement of the Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in Millions)                              Three Months Ended   Three Months Ended
                                                     March 31, 2000     March 31, 2000 (a)
                                                   ------------------   ------------------
<S>                                                <C>                 <C>
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income from continuing operations                  $         45.4      $         45.4
  Add - Income taxes                                           28.8                28.8
      - Fixed charges                                          43.9                18.9
                                                     --------------      --------------

Adjusted earnings                                    $        118.1      $         93.1
                                                     ==============      ==============

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                   $         40.3      $         15.3
  Portion of rent expense representing interest                 3.6                 3.6
                                                     --------------      --------------

Adjusted fixed charges                               $         43.9      $         18.9
                                                     ==============      ==============


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                             2.69                4.93
</TABLE>


(a)  Excludes $24.9 million of interest expense associated with commercial paper
     issued by the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, GTE Funding Incorporated
     (GTE Funding), on behalf of GTE's other domestic telephone operating
     subsidiaries. This interest expense is approximately equal to the interest
     income received by the Company on affiliate notes between GTE Funding and
     such domestic telephone operating subsidiaries. GTE Funding provides
     short-term financing and investment vehicles and cash management services
     for the Company and six other of GTE's domestic telephone operating
     subsidiaries.
# CA2007163EN.01000101.xml

| 17.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 163/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 163/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

July 31, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-14789

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-02808-CV-TCB-1

CAROL T. MACKEY,

CALVIN MACKEY,

Plaintiffs-CounterDefendants-Appellants,

versus

FDIC-R,

Defendant-CounterClaimant-Appellee,

JOEL A. FREEDMAN,

DOES 3-10,

Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(July 31, 2009)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, and BOWEN, District

*

Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Carol and Calvin Mackey appeal from the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of the defendant, FDIC-R, on their claims seeking rescission

under the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1635, as well as the court’s dismissal

of their other federal and state law claims.

We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment, applying

the same legal standard used by the district court. Johnson v. Bd. of Regents of

Univ. Of Ga., 263 F.3d 1234, 1242 (11th Cir. 2001).

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the benefit

of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment based

on the magistrate judge’s well-reasoned Report and Recommendation filed on

August 7, 2007.

AFFIRMED.

Honorable Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., United States District Judge for the Southern District *

of Georgia, sitting by designation.

2
# Official Journal L 41/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 41 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6313 February 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 41

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6313 February 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2020/177 of 11 February 2020 amending Council Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 68/193/EEC, 2002/55/EC, 2002/56/EC and 2002/57/EC, Commission Directives 93/49/EEC and 93/61/EEC and Implementing Directives 2014/21/EU and 2014/98/EU as regards pests of plants on seeds and other plant reproductive material (Text with EEA relevance) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DIRECTIVES

*

Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2020/177 of 11 February 2020 amending Council Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 68/193/EEC, 2002/55/EC, 2002/56/EC and 2002/57/EC, Commission Directives 93/49/EEC and 93/61/EEC and Implementing Directives 2014/21/EU and 2014/98/EU as regards pests of plants on seeds and other plant reproductive material (Text with EEA relevance) (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
November 7, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MAHA KHALIFA AL

- LAHIQ, M.D. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00158

- CV V.

ULYSSES L. ROSEMOND , A ppellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, ULYSSES L. ROSEMOND , signed, January 29, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. W e REVERSE the trial court’s order, RENDER judgment dismissing Rosemond’s claims with prejudice, and REMAND to the trial court for determination of reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appea l be paid by appellee ULYSSES L. ROSEMOND

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1694** 

ROBERT DONNELL DONALDSON , Petitioner ,
v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD , Respondent, and DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Intervenor
.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Merit Systems Protection Board . ( DC

- 1221

- 12

- 0356

- B

- 1 )

Submitted : November 30, 2015 D ecided: December 14, 2015

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
.
Robert Donnell Donaldson, Petitioner Pro Se. Katherine Michelle Smith, U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Joshua Ethan Kurland, U .S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Intervenor.
Unpublished opinions are n ot binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Donnell Donaldson seeks review of the Merit System s Protection Board’s order dismissing his whistleblower retaliation appeal. See 5 U.S.C. A. § 7703 (b)(1)(B) ( West Supp. 201 5 ). Our review of the re cord discloses that the Board did not err in concluding that it lacked jurisdiction over Donaldson’s appeal . Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board
. Donaldson v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec. , No. DC

- 1221

- 12

- 0356

- B

- 1 (M .S.P.B. Sept. 16, 2014)
. We further deny Donaldson’s motions for summary disposition, to strike the Board’s entire brief, and to verify the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mat erials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. PETITION DENIED
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 976

To disregard cost-of-living adjustments in tier 1 railroad retirement benefits

in determining eligibility for supplemental security income benefits under

Medicaid.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 18, 1993

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To disregard cost-of-living adjustments in tier 1 railroad

retirement benefits in determining eligibility for supplemental security income benefits under Medicaid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENTS IN TIER 1 RAIL4 ROAD RETIREMENT BENEFITS DISREGARDED

5 IN DETERMINING ELIGIBLITY FOR SUPPLE6 MENTAL SECURITY INCOME BENEFITS

7 UNDER MEDICAID.

8 Section 503 of Public Law 94-566 (90 Stat. 2685)

9 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new
2

•HR 976 IH

1 sentence: ‘‘The preceding provisions of this section shall

2 be applied by treating references to monthly insurance

3 benefits under title II of the Social Security Act as includ4 ing references to tier 1 railroad retirement benefits (as

5 defined in section 86(d)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code

6 of 1986); except that in applying such treatment the 1st

7 month beginning after the date of the enactment of this

8 sentence shall be substituted for ‘June 1977’ and ‘October

9 1990’ shall be substituted for ‘April 1977’.’’

Æ
DANIEL J. LEVITAN

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FI LED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1438

Opinion filed February 5, 2016.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

.

Daniel J. Levitan, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Tallahassee Bureau Chief,

Criminal Appea ls, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

ROBERTS, C.J., WOLF and THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
### ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 001 Attachment Name 3,4-dimethyl-1 H-pyrazole 

### Associated PMN Section Number Pt.I, Sec.B, le. Does not contain CBI



### Report Number DMP_101122926607598H 3 C CH3 CclnncclC 

# / N InChI= I C5HBN2Icl-4-3-6-7-5(4)2/h3H,I -2H3,(H,6,7) N H 3,4-dimethyl-l H-pyrazole
AFS-10-369-E August 24, 2010 Exemption No. 8775B Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-25092

Mr. Glen F. Wattman Director, Office of Aviation Management U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW. Washington, DC 20585

Dear Mr. Wattman:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8775, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated August 5, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Wackenhut Services, Inc. (WSI), a c ontractor for the Department of Energy (DOE), for an exemption from § 91.209(a)(1) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to allow the WSI to provide transportation of special response teams who will conduct night-vision-goggle lights-out training or actual security response for the DOE’s site security plan.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to DOE.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8775, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 8775, as amended, to August 31, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8775, as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8775.

Sincerely,

/s/

Lawrence Fields Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service