alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE ATTENTION OF CANDIDATES FOR REGISTRATION IN THE DATABASE OF INDIVIDUAL EXPERTS MANAGED BY EUROPEAID

(2005/C 159 A/03)

Candidates for registration in the database of individual experts currently managed by EuropeAid are hereby informed that the system is being phased out in all areas and subareas other than those relating to humanitarian aid managed by DG ECHO:

With effect from the publication of this information notice, the ‘Call for applications from individual experts for technical assistance to third countries in the context of the European Community's external cooperation’ (SCRE/111508/C/SV), published in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 274A of 26 September 2000, and the system for online registration and updating of applications in the database will be retained only in respect of the areas and subareas necessary for carrying out humanitarian aid missions managed by DG ECHO:

No new applications for registration will be accepted for the other areas. The files of all candidates who have a valid registration in the database at this date will be retained in the database until 30 April 2006, unless the Commission is otherwise instructed by the expert in a letter sent by registered mail. After that date, the details of experts in areas and subareas not listed above will be deleted.

----

----
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201800174

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

Michael D. CARDONA

Staff Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Major John L. Ferriter, USMC.

For Appellant: Lieutenant Gregory Hargis, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 13 September 2018

_________________________

Before FULTON, CRISFIELD, and RUSSELL, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

FOR THE COURT

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 181

Providing for the termination of official funding of certain legislative service

organizations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 24, 1993

Mr. ROBERTS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Providing for the termination of official funding of certain

legislative service organizations.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF OFFICIAL FUNDING OF CER3 TAIN LEGISLATIVE SERVICE ORGANIZA4 TIONS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection

6 (b), effective July 1, 1993, no legislative service organiza7 tion may—

8 (1) receive amounts from the clerk hire allow9 ance or the official expenses allowance; or
2

•HR 181 IH

1 (2) use office space or any other facility or serv2 ice that is paid for from official funds.

3 (b) SPECIAL RULE.—Subsection (a) shall not apply

4 with respect to one legislative service organization for each

5 political party represented in the House, if such legislative

6 service organization is devoted solely to legislative research

7 and legislative support for the Members of the House who

8 are affiliated with such political party.

9 SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

10 As used in section 1, the term ‘‘legislative service or11 ganization’’ has the meaning given that term in paragraph

12 (1) of the regulation of the Committee on House Adminis13 tration on legislative service organizations, dated October

14 21, 1981.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30234 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARISTOBULO JORI-BANGUERA, also known as Edwin Diaz-Trinidad, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CR-83-1-G

-------------------- November 17, 1999 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Aristobulo Jori-Banguera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jori-Banguera has filed no response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,888
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                       321
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,501
<PP&E>                                           2,607
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,883
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,338
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,904
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    704
<INCOME-TAX>                                       280
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                424
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       424
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
# C_2009018EN.01S00301.xml

| 24.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 18/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 18/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF GOLF-TECHNOLOGY HOLDING, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BYY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          60,106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  759,801
<ALLOWANCES>                                   232,652
<INVENTORY>                                  1,061,815
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,287,457
<PP&E>                                         377,764
<DEPRECIATION>                                 140,598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,881,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,752,654
<BONDS>                                        737,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        399
<COMMON>                                         4,350
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,881,111
<SALES>                                      3,544,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,544,183
<CGS>                                        1,745,007
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,015,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,469,717
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               320,187
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,584,111)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,584,111)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,584,111)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
260 La. 1069

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Nolie CALTON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 52203.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 1972.

In re: Nolie Calton applying for remedial writs and habeas corpus.

Application denied; the showing made does not warrant the exercise of our jurisdiction.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 151

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the income tax

imposed on social security benefits should not be increased.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 2, 1993

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. FIELDS of Texas, Mr. ROTH, Mr.

KYL, Mr. LIGHTFOOT, Mr. ZIMMER, Mrs. FOWLER, Mr. ROGERS, Mrs.

VUCANOVICH, Mr. WALSH, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. ZELIFF, and Mr. CANADY)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the income tax imposed on social security benefits should

not be increased.

Whereas over 9,000,000 social security recipients would be

adversely affected by the President’s current proposal of

an increase in the tax on social security benefits;

Whereas those affected by this tax increase would pay on average an extra $483 per year;

Whereas without an inflation adjustment, the percentage of

affected seniors who would in effect be taxed twice on the

same income will rise significantly in 5 years;

Whereas under the President’s current proposals, middle

class senior citizens would be expected to pay more taxes
2

•HRES 151 IH

not only on social security benefits, but also on Medicare

premiums and energy costs;

Whereas the proposed increase in the tax on social security

benefits is the only part of the President’s plan which is

conceded to be a tax increase on a segment of the middle

class;

Whereas many senior citizens on fixed incomes cannot be

without these much-needed benefits in this current economic climate;

Whereas senior citizens have historically been the target of

numerous measures to place on them heavy burdens,

such as proposed freezes in their cost-of-living adjustment and the initial implementation of the tax on social

security benefits;

Whereas such a tax increase would affect not only current

middle- and upper-class senior citizens but also millions

of future social security beneficiaries, and

Whereas almost three-quarters of all Americans oppose an increase in taxation on social security benefits: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the income tax imposed on social security

3 benefits should not be increased.

Æ
House Calendar No. 65

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 927

[Report No. 103–169]

A BILL

Pennsylvania as the National Aviary in Pittsburgh.

To designate the Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh,

JULY 13, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IB

House Calendar No. 65

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 927

[Report No. 103–169]

To designate the Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania as the

National Aviary in Pittsburgh.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 17, 1993

Mr. COYNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

JULY 13, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh,

Pennsylvania as the National Aviary in Pittsburgh.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is

5 designated as the ‘‘National Aviary in Pittsburgh’’.
2

HR 927 RH

1 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in any law, regulation, document,

3 record, map, or other paper of the United States to the

4 aviary referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference

5 to the ‘‘National Aviary in Pittsburgh’’.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERNALLY
PREPARED FOR 9 MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH 10Q FOR PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         161,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,509,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (400,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,508,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,131,000
<PP&E>                                       5,853,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,175,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,086,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,556,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,348,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,086,000
<SALES>                                      9,192,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,089,000
<CGS>                                        5,625,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,326,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,588,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             694,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,549,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,573,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,573,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 222 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
  H. RES. 222

Providing for the public release of documentation and testimony before 
                   the House Post Office Task Force.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 1993

 Mr. Michel submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the public release of documentation and testimony before 
                   the House Post Office Task Force.

Whereas on July 22, 1992, the House of Representatives voted to transmit to the 
        Committee on Standards of Official Conduct the committee report and all 
        records obtained by the Task Force to Investigate the Operation and 
        Management of the House Post Office;
Whereas the report of the Committee on House Administration selectively included 
        portions of the transcript of the proceedings of the Task Force in the 
        appendix of their Report;
Whereas efforts in the One hundred second Congress to release the full 
        transcript of the Task Force were defeated in the House on July 22, 
        1992, and July 23, 1992;
Whereas the former Postmaster of the House of Representatives, Robert V. Rota, 
        from 1978 continuing until April 1992 conspired, confederated, and 
        agreed with other persons, including Members of Congress, to commit 
        offenses against the United States;
Whereas the former Postmaster has pled guilty to making false statements to the 
        Task Force and discussed with his supervisor of accounts the need to 
        withhold information during interviews with United States Postal 
        Inspectors and the congressional committee investigating the House Post 
        Office;
Whereas the former Postmaster engaged in a cover up of the exchange of vouchers 
        and postage stamps for cash beginning in May 1980 and continued 
        throughout the House investigation of the post office; and
Whereas the integrity of the House of Representatives has been impugned by the 
        actions of Mr. Rota and others: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Committee on House Administration is directed to 
immediately make public complete transcripts of all proceedings of the 
Task Force, including depositions and statements of witnesses and any 
tapes of such proceedings.

                                 <all>
```
#### Robert DENMARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1066.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 4, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 233 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 233

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        August 4, 1993.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2401) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1994 for military 
activities of the Department of Defense, to prescribe military personnel 
strengths for fiscal year 1994, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 
bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and the amendment 
in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Armed Services now 
printed in the bill and shall not exceed two hours equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed 
Services. After general debate the Committee shall rise without motion. No 
further consideration of the bill shall be in order except pursuant to a 
subsequent order of the House.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph Goffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 03/22/2012 12:04 AM

Subject: Revised GHG NSPS preamble

Dom,

The attached version of the preamble responds to the comments your staff provided on transitional units 

as well as a few other fixes. We also fixed a few inconsistencies in chapter 5 of the RIA

- Kevin

EGU NSPS preamble 3-21.docx

 

RIA chap 5.docx
#### Warren W. BOHN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-172.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 31, 1978.

*1234Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Karen M. Gottlieb, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and HEN-DRY and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Warren Bohn, appeals the summary denial of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850.

In a negotiated guilty plea to second degree murder, Bohn received a prison sentence of 25 years. Subsequently, he filed the instant motion to vacate attacking his judgment and sentence on the following grounds: (1) the sentencing judge failed to find a factual basis to support the guilty plea; (2) he did not plead guilty; (3) the presentence investigation report contained errors in that it listed a prior felony when, in fact, there was no felony because he was a juvenile at the time of commission, thus this information was to be suppressed; (4) the police report contained fabrications and distortions; and (5) the court erred in declaring him partially indigent for costs when, in fact, he was totally indigent. The judge who sentenced Bohn also considered the motion to vacate and then summarily denied it for the reasons that the record affirmatively showed that Bohn pled freely and voluntarily with the aid and consultation of counsel and the evidence admitted at the guilty plea proceedings affirmatively showed that there was a basis in fact to support the plea of guilty. The judge further found that the motion to vacate was insufficient in substance to support the prayed for relief.

The established law is that the trial court need not conduct a hearing on the merits when the grounds of the motion to vacate are totally insufficient or are refuted by the record after the required examination thereof. *State v. Weeks,*166 So.2d 892 (Fla.1964); *Maisonave v. State,*171 So.2d 443 (Fla.3d DCA 1965).

Examining Bohn’s motion to vacate in light of the above principles of law, we find that grounds 1, 2 and 5 are clearly refuted by the record. Turning next to the remaining grounds 3 and 4, we note that these allegations are unsupported as the reports are not attached to the motion and there are no affidavits of anyone who read the reports to the effect that they are erroneous or distorted. See *Stringer v. State,*246 So.2d 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). In addition, a reading of the transcript of the sentencing hearing reflects that the judge was aware that Bohn had no previous convictions, and there was no mention of any prior convictions. Last, the same judge who adjudicated Bohn guilty and imposed *1235sentence upon him denied the subject motion to vacate, and implicit in the denial was the fact that any errors in the presen-tence report and/or in the police report did not influence him when he imposed the sentence upon Bohn. Cf. *Iacovetti v. United States,*534 F.2d 1189, 1191 (5th Cir. 1976).

Affirmed.