CECW-HS

SUBJECT: Interim Policy for Determining Eligibility Status of Flood Risk Management 

Projects for the Rehabilitation Program Pursuant to Public Law (P.L.) 84-99 

2

direction of the Rehabilitation Program and enable its continued implementation while 

revisions to 33 CFR Part 203 (reference 1.f.) are developed and promulgated.

c. This memorandum supersedes the eligibility criteria in Appendix B of EP 500-1-1

(reference 1.b.) and supersedes reference 1.d. For the current version of the inspection 

checklist (entitled Flood Damage Reduction Segment/System Inspection Report), see 

Enclosure 2.

d. This memorandum revises the applicability of the System-Wide Improvement 

Framework (SWIF) policy in reference 1.c.

e. All other policies associated with the Rehabilitation Program including, but not 

limited to, the determination of deferred maintenance activities remain in effect. 

f. Eligibility for rehabilitation assistance will be determined pursuant to paragraphs 

5 and 6 of this interim policy, which specifies that only a subset of the criteria previously 

used to determine eligibility will continue to be used to make eligibility determinations 

during the interim period. Note: vegetation management will not be considered in 

making an eligibility determination. A final policy will be established through notice and 

comment rulemaking. Any eligibility criteria eliminated by this interim policy will be 

restored, if at all, only through a public rulemaking process.

4. Applicability.

a. This policy is effective immediately and applies to all Headquarters (HQUSACE)

elements, divisions, districts, laboratories, and other field operating activities of USACE. 

b. This interim policy provides criteria for eligibility determinations for levee systems

as outlined in paragraphs 5 and 6 below. Eligibility determinations for channels, dams, 

tunnels and debris basins will remain suspended and their status (either Active or 

Inactive) will remain unchanged. 

c. This interim policy does not impact federal coastal storm damage reduction 

(CSDR) projects (also known as hurricane and shore protection projects). For these 

projects, applicable policies in reference 1.a. still apply.

5. Eligibility Determination for Levee Systems.

a. These interim eligibility criteria will be used to determine eligibility for 

rehabilitation assistance for levee systems until final policy is issued.

b. Continuing Eligibility for Rehabilitation Assistance.
CECW-HS

SUBJECT: Interim Policy for Determining Eligibility Status of Flood Risk Management 

Projects for the Rehabilitation Program Pursuant to Public Law (P.L.) 84-99 

3

(1) Federal and non-federal levee systems that are currently Active in the 

Rehabilitation Program will be evaluated for continuing eligibility using the interim 

eligibility criteria in paragraph 6.f. during the next scheduled Continuing Eligibility 

Inspection (CEI) or in accordance with Letters of Intent (LOIs) and SWIFs (reference 

1.c.).

(2) Federal and non-federal levee systems with a CEI conducted prior to the 

date of this memorandum and for which the public sponsor has not been provided an 

eligibility determination (based on reference 1.d.) will be reevaluated using the interim 

eligibility criteria in paragraph 6.f. Reevaluations may be conducted using information 

from the previous inspection report. Therefore, reinspection may not be necessary.

(3) Upon request by the public sponsor, federal levee systems that are currently 

Inactive in the Rehabilitation Program can be reinspected and reevaluated for eligibility 

based on the interim eligibility criteria. Inactive federal levee systems that meet the 

interim eligibility criteria may regain Active status in the Rehabilitation Program. See 

paragraph 5.c. for more information on Inactive non-federal levee systems. 

(4) Newly constructed federal levee systems are granted Active status when the 

public sponsor assumes operation and maintenance responsibilities. CEI 

determinations for these newly constructed federal levee systems will use the interim 

eligibility criteria in paragraph 6.f.

c. Initial Eligibility Inspections (IEIs) for Non-Federal Levee Systems.

(1) Non-federal levee systems seeking entry or reentry into the Rehabilitation 

Program require an IEI to determine eligibility.

(2) IEIs may be conducted and eligibility determinations will be made using the 

interim criteria provided in paragraph 6.

(3) Non-federal levee systems with an IEI conducted prior to the date of this 

memorandum and for which the public sponsor has not been provided an eligibility 

determination (based on reference 1.d.) will be reevaluated using the interim eligibility 

criteria in paragraph 6.e.

d. Levee Owner’s Manual and Operations and Maintenance Responsibilities.

(1) For non-federal levee systems, the Levee Owner’s Manual (reference 1.e.)

will continue to serve as a maintenance reference document. The eligibility criteria in 

the Levee Owner’s Manual that must be met to gain and maintain an Active status in the
CECW-HS

SUBJECT: Interim Policy for Determining Eligibility Status of Flood Risk Management 

Projects for the Rehabilitation Program Pursuant to Public Law (P.L.) 84-99 

4

Rehabilitation Program are superseded by this memorandum. Districts will ensure that 

public sponsors of non-federal levee systems are aware of these changes.

(2) USACE encourages public sponsors to follow the maintenance practices in 

the Levee Owner’s Manual as an element of best practices in flood risk management.

(3) USACE will use this interim policy to determine eligibility for the 

Rehabilitation Program for federal levee systems. Public sponsors of federal levee 

systems normally have obligations regarding how they operate and maintain the levee 

systems under the authorizing legislation and the terms of the project cooperation 

agreement with USACE. These obligations are independent of any decision to 

participate in the Rehabilitation Program.

6. Interim Rehabilitation Program Eligibility Requirements for Levee Systems. The 

following section is in reference to Enclosure 2, the Flood Damage Reduction 

Segment/System Inspection Report (also referred to as Inspection Checklist).

a. The Inspection Checklist will continue to be used for all levee system inspections. 

The full inspection report will be provided to public sponsors to provide a complete 

assessment of the levee condition. The full inspection results including an overall 

system rating and description of specific deficiencies are critical information public 

sponsors need to effectively operate and maintain their levee system, prioritize any 

repairs or improvements and conduct communication and risk reduction activities. The 

overall levee segment and overall levee system ratings will continue to be assigned in 

accordance with Enclosure 2, Sections F-G on page B-5. Providing up to two years to 

correct Unacceptable items still applies and will still be used to determine the overall 

system rating. However, the overall system rating will no longer be used to determine 

status in the Rehabilitation Program. As such Enclosure 2, Section H on page B-5 does 

not apply. Instead paragraphs 6.e. and 6.f. of this interim policy will be used to 

determine Active or Inactive status.

b. In accordance with current policy, eligibility determinations will be based on a 

levee system basis. If a levee system comprises more than one levee segment, all 

segments must meet the interim eligibility criteria, identified in paragraphs 6.e. and 6.f.,

for the entire levee system to be Active. If one levee segment does not meet the interim 

eligibility criteria, the entire levee system will be Inactive.

c. Channels that are integral to a levee system will be inspected as part of that

levee system, using existing channel-related inspection items. However, eligibility 

determinations will be based on the levee system. Therefore, if a levee system is 

deemed Active, the associated channel is also considered to be Active and eligible for 

rehabilitation assistance. 
CECW-HS

SUBJECT: Interim Policy for Determining Eligibility Status of Flood Risk Management 

Projects for the Rehabilitation Program Pursuant to Public Law (P.L.) 84-99 

5

d. If inspectors encounter conditions that put the inspectors at personal risk or 

conditions that make it impossible to conduct the inspection, including evaluating the 

interim eligibility criteria, the inspector will end the inspection. The levee system will be 

deemed Inactive and reconsideration of status will not occur until final policy issuance or 

the public sponsor may pursue a SWIF (paragraph 7 and reference 1.c.).

e. Non-federal levee systems must meet all the Initial Eligibility requirements of

Enclosure 2, pages B-7 through B-9, in addition to the requirements identified in 

paragraph 6.f. for CEIs. 

f. Requirements for eligibility under a CEI.

(1) All public sponsors must complete the maintenance program information on 

page B-2 of Enclosure 2.

(2) For non-federal levee systems, confirmation that Initial Eligibility Items 1-5 on 

page B-7 of Enclosure 2 continue to be met and must be documented in the CEI.

(3) Levee segment/system has received an Individual Item/Component Rating of 

Acceptable or Minimally Acceptable for the following items, which are a subset of the 

items of the existing Inspection Checklist:

Levee Embankments

Rated Item Page Number, 

Enclosure 2

Item Number

Encroachments B-11 3

Closure Structures (Stop Log, Earthen Closures, 

Gates, or Sandbags Closures)

B-11 4

Slope Stability B-12 5

Erosion/Bank Caving B-12 6

Animal Control B-13 10

Culverts/Discharge Pipes (This item includes both 

concrete and corrugated metal pipes.)

B-13 11

Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe Drainage Systems B-14 14

Floodwalls

Rated Item Page Number, 

Enclosure 2

Item Number

Encroachments B-16 2

Closure Structures (Stop Log Closures and Gates) B-16 3

Tilting, Sliding, or Settlement of Concrete Structures B-17 5

Foundation of Concrete Structures B-17 6

Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe Drainage Systems B-18 8
CECW-HS

SUBJECT: Interim Policy for Determining Eligibility Status of Flood Risk Management 

Projects for the Rehabilitation Program Pursuant to Public Law (P.L.) 84-99 

6

Interior Drainage System

Rated Item Page Number, 

Enclosure 2

Item Number

Culverts/Discharge Pipes B-21 9

Sluice/Slide Gates B-21 10

Flap Gates/Flap Valves/Pinch Valves B-22 11

Pump Stations

Rated Item Page Number, 

Enclosure 2

Item Number

Intake and Discharge Pipelines B-27 17

Sluice/Slide Gates B-27 18

Flap Gates/Flap Valves/Pinch Valves B-27 19

A summary list of the Rated Items that are to be used to determine status for the 

Rehabilitation Program can be found in Enclosure 3. Enclosure 3 is an optional

document for communicating eligibility information to the public sponsor. 

g. Notification procedures outlined for overall system ratings found in Enclosure 2, 

Section J, on page B-6 still apply. Results of an eligibility determination in accordance 

with this interim policy (paragraphs 6.e. and 6.f.) will be included as part of the final 

Inspection Report package provided to the public sponsor. 

7. Policy on SWIF Actions.

a. The policy for the implementation of SWIFs was issued on 29 November 2011

(reference 1.c.). This policy creates a process for working with public sponsors to plan 

and implement system-wide improvements. The process consists of a LOI that leads to 

the development of a long-term SWIF, which also provides for environmental 

compliance. The following paragraphs provide additional detail for processing LOIs and 

SWIFs as part of this interim policy.

b. The policy for SWIFs remains in effect and USACE will continue to process LOIs 

and SWIFs from public sponsors. Public sponsors are encouraged to continue to 

develop SWIFs to improve the performance and reliability of their levee systems.

c. For LOIs that have been approved by HQUSACE, districts will notify the public 

sponsor in writing of its options to: 1) retain its current LOI; 2) adjust its LOI (and 

subsequently its draft SWIF) to focus on actions to address deficiencies to meet the 

interim eligibility criteria outlined in paragraph 6; or 3) terminate its LOI if the interim 

eligibility criteria can be met without further system-wide improvements. Public 

sponsors must submit notification in writing of their selected option within 60 days of 
CECW-HS

SUBJECT: Interim Policy for Determining Eligibility Status of Flood Risk Management 

Projects for the Rehabilitation Program Pursuant to Public Law (P.L.) 84-99 

7

district notification. If the public sponsor chooses to adjust its LOI, the sponsor will 

provide the district with the proposed changes as part of its written response. The 

district will determine if the changes are sufficient to meet the intent of the SWIF policy 

and address the interim eligibility criteria. If the district determines the changes are 

sufficient, the district will approve the changes to the LOI, notify the public sponsor, and 

amend the LOI documentation. The timeline to develop the SWIF (up to two years) may 

be extended as deemed appropriate by the district, not to exceed one additional year. 

The final amended document will be submitted to the division, the HQUSACE P.L. 84-

99 Program Manager and the HQUSACE point of contact for SWIF.

d. For SWIFs accepted by HQUSACE, districts will notify the public sponsor in 

writing of its options to: 1) retain its current SWIF; 2) adjust its SWIF to focus on actions 

to address deficiencies to meet the interim eligibility criteria outlined in paragraph 6; or 

3) terminate its SWIF if the interim eligibility criteria can be met without further systemwide improvements. Public sponsors must submit notification in writing of their selected 

option within 60 days of the district notification. If the public sponsor chooses to adjust 

its SWIF, the sponsor will provide the district with the proposed changes as part of its 

written response. The district will determine if the changes are sufficient to meet the 

intent of the SWIF policy and address the interim eligibility criteria. If the district 

determines the changes are sufficient, the district will approve the changes to the SWIF,

notify the public sponsor and amend the SWIF documentation. The final amended 

document will be submitted to the division, the HQUSACE P.L. 84-99 Program Manager

and the HQUSACE point of contact for SWIF. 

e. For LOIs under development, districts will provide public sponsors with the 

interim eligibility criteria and their options to: 1) continue to focus the LOI to address all 

system-wide deficiencies; 2) adjust the LOI to focus on actions to address deficiencies 

to meet the interim eligibility criteria outlined in paragraph 6; or 3) discontinue the LOI 

development if the interim eligibility criteria can be met without further system-wide 

improvements.

f. Environmental compliance and consideration of other requirements, such as 

compliance with the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and treaties with Tribes, must 

continue to be integrated into and accomplished as part of an accepted SWIF’s 

implementation. Note that the acceptance of a SWIF does not require environmental 

compliance because that action only establishes a plan for future action without any 

irreversible commitment of resources. However, the public sponsor’s implementation of 

the actions agreed to in the SWIF may trigger environmental compliance requirements, 

in which case USACE is responsible for assuring compliance with all applicable 

environmental requirements prior to implementation of any SWIF action by the public 

sponsor that would affect the environment or other resources. Any ESA compliance 

that is determined to be required for the implementation of a SWIF will be accomplished 

A-1

Enclosure 1: Terms Used in this Document

Active. A status applied to flood risk management projects concerning participation in the 

Rehabilitation Program under the authority of P.L. 84-99. An Active project must have 

met USACE criteria for entry into the Rehabilitation Program. Only Active projects may 

receive rehabilitation assistance to repair damages caused by a flood event or coastal 

storm.

Continuing Eligibility Inspection (CEI). An evaluation of Active federal and non-federal

flood risk management projects conducted in order to make a status determination for the 

Rehabilitation Program. Inactive federal flood risk management projects can regain 

Active status as a result of a CEI.

Federal Levee System. For the purposes of this interim policy, a federal levee system

means a levee system that is federally authorized and constructed, with a public sponsor 

being responsible for operations, maintenance, repair, replacement and rehabilitation

(OMRR&R).

Inactive. A status applied to flood risk management projects concerning participation in 

the Rehabilitation Program under the authority of P.L. 84-99. Inactive projects include 

formerly Active non-federal projects that left Active status voluntarily or non-federal and 

federally authorized projects that have been determined by USACE to no longer meet the 

eligibility criteria. 

Initial Eligibility Inspection (IEI). An evaluation conducted to make a status determination 

of non-federal flood risk management projects that are either currently Inactive or that are 

seeking to gain entry into the Rehabilitation Program for the first time.

Levee Feature. A levee feature is a structure that is critical to the functioning of a levee 

system. Examples include embankment sections, floodwall sections, closure structures, 

pumping stations, interior drainage works and flood risk management channels.

Levee Segment. A levee segment is a discrete portion of a levee system that is operated 

and maintained by a single entity. A levee segment may comprise one or more levee 

features.

Levee System. One or more segments of earthen embankment or floodwall and all 

appurtenant structures (such as closures, berms, pumping stations, culverts, and 

interior drainage) that are interconnected and necessary to ensure exclusion of 

floodwater from a defined area.

Non-Federal Levee System. For the purposes of this interim policy, the term non-federal 

levee system will refer to those levee systems that have been constructed by a local 

government or public sponsor. Operations and maintenance is also the responsibility of 

the local government or public sponsor.
A-2

Public Sponsor. For purposes of this interim policy, a public sponsor is a public entity that 

is a legally constituted public body with full authority and capability to perform the terms of 

its agreement as the non-federal partner of USACE for a project. A public sponsor may 

be a state, county, city, town, federally recognized Indian Tribe or tribal organization, 

Alaska Native Corporation or any political subpart of a state or group of states.
Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System 

Inspection Report

Name of Segment / System: Public Sponsor(s): Public Sponsor Representative: Sponsor Phone: Sponsor Email: Corps of Engineers Inspector: Date of InspectioInspection Report Prepared By: Date Report PrepareInternal Technical Review (for Periodic Inspections) By: Date of ITRFinal Approved By: Date Approve

Initial Eligibility Inspection Overall Segment / System Rating: Acceptable

 Continuing Eligibility Inspection (Routine) Minimally Acc

Type of Inspection:

 Continuing Eligibility Inspection (Periodic) Unacceptable 

Instructions

 Initial Eligibility Inspection  General Items for All Flood Control Works 

Levee Embankment

 Concrete Floodwalls  Sheet Pile and Concrete I-walls 

Interior Drainage System

 Pump Stations 

Contents of Report: 

 FDR System Channels 

Note: In addition to the report contents indicated here, a pthe system, with stationing, should be included with this relocations of items rated less than acceptable. Photos of gecondition and any noted deficiencies should also be attache

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-1
Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System 

Public Sponsor Pre-Inspection For

m

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

The following information is to be provided by the levee district sponsor prior to an inspection. This information will be used to help evaluate thlevee district to manage the levee segment / system maintenance program. 

1. Levee segment / system and district: (name of the segment / system and levee district) 2. Reporting period: (month/day/year to month/day/year) 3. Summary of maintenance required by last inspection report: 4. Summary of maintenance performed this reporting period: 5. Summary of maintenance planned next reporting period: 6. Summary of changes to segment / system since last inspection: 7. Problems/ issues requiring the assistance of the US Army Corps of Engineers: 

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-2
Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Public Sponsor Pre-Inspection Report The following information is to be provided by the levee district sponsor prior to an inspection 8. Levee district organization: (elected or appointed levee district officials and key employees) Name Position Mailing Address Phone Number Email Addre

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-3
Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corpsof Engineers®

General Instructions for the Inspection of Flood Damage Reduction Segments / S

A. Purpose of USACE Inspections: 

The primary purpose of these inspections is to prevent loss of life and catastrophic damages; preserve the value of Federal investments, and to encourage non-Federal 

their own protection. Inspections should assure that Flood Damage Reduction structures and facilities are continually maintained and operated as necessary to obtain 

are also conducted to determine eligibility for Rehabilitation Assistance under authority of PL 84-99 for Federal and non-Federal systems. (ER 1130-2-530, ER 500-

B. Types of Inspections: 

The Corps conducts several types of inspections of Flood Damage Reduction systems, as outlined below: 

Continuing Eligibility Inspections 

Initial Eligibility Inspections 

Routine Inspections Periodic Inspections 

IEIs are conducted to determine whether a nonFederally constructed Flood Damage Reduction system meets the minimum criteria and standards set forth by the Corps for initial inclusion into the Rehabilitation and Inspection Program. 

RIs are intended to verify proper maintenance, owner preparedness, and component operation. 

PIs are intended to verify proper maintenance and component operation structural stability, and safety of the system. Periodic Inspections evalu

vs. current design criteria to determine potential performance impacts, compare the design loads and design analysis used against current desigidentify components and features for the sponsor that need to be monitocorrected as needed. (Periodic Inspections are used as the basis of risk 

C. Inspection Boundaries: 

Inspections should be conducted so as to rate each Flood Damage Reduction "Segment" of the system. The overall system rating will be the lowest segment rating in 

Project System 

A flood damage reduction project is made up of one or more flood damage reduction systems which were under the same authorization. 

A flood damage reduction system is made up of one or more flood damage reduction segments which collectively provide flood damage reduction to a defined area. Failure of one segment within a system constitutes failure of the entire system. Failure of one system does not affect another system. 

A flood damage reduction portion of a flood damage 

maintained by a single entsegment can be made up ofloodwall, pump stations, 

D. Land Use Definitions: 

The following three definitions are intended for use in determining minimum required inspection intervals and initial requirements for inclusion into the Rehabilitatio

Inspections should be considered for all systems that would result in significant environmental or economic impact upon failure regardless of specific land use. 

Agricultural Rural Urban 

Protected population in the range of zero to 5 households per square mile protected. 

Protected population in the range of 6 to 20 households per square mile protected. 

Greater than 20 households per square mile; major industrial areas with 

Some protected urban areas have no permanent population but may be iinfrastructure with no overnight population. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-4
Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corpsof Engineers®

E. Use of the Inspection Report Template: 

The report template is intended for use in all Army Corps of Engineers inspections of levee and floodwall systems and flood damage reduction channels. The section 

Eligibility" only needs to be completed during Initial Eligibility Inspections of Non-Federally constructed Flood Damage Reduction Systems. The section labeled "Gwith every inspection, along with all other sections that correspond to features in the system. The section labeled "Public Sponsor Pre-Inspection Report" is intended 

if possible. 

F. Individual Item / Component Ratings: 

Assessment of individual components rated during the inspection should be based on the criteria provided in the inspection report template, though inspectors may in

report based on the characteristics of the system. The assessment of individual components should be based on the following definitions. 

Acceptable Item Minimally Acceptable Item Un

The inspected item is in satisfactory condition, with no deficiencies, and will function as intended during the next flood event. 

The inspected item has one or more minor deficiencies that need to be corrected. The minor deficiency or deficiencies will not seriously impair the functioning of the item as intended during the next flood event. 

The inspected item has onneed to be corrected. The seriously impair the functithe next flood event. 

G. Overall Segment / System Ratings: 

Determination of the overall system rating is based on the definitions below. Note that an Unacceptable System Rating may be either based on an engineering determ

deficiencies would prevent the system from functioning as intended during the next flood event, or based on the sponsor's demonstrated lack of commitment or inabil

timely manner. 

Acceptable System Minimally Acceptable System Unac

All items or components are rated as Acceptable. One or more items are rated as Minimally Acceptable or one or more items are 

rated as Unacceptable and an engineering determination concludes that the 

Unacceptable items would not prevent the segment / system from performing as intended during the next flood event. 

One or more items are ratethe segment / system from deficiency noted in past inresulted in a minimally accorrected within the estabyears. 

H. Eligibility for PL84-99 Rehabilitation Assistance: 

Inspected systems that are not operated and maintained by the Federal government may be Active in the Corps' Rehabilitation and Inspection Program (RIP) and elig

the Corps as defined below: 

If the Overall System Rating is Acceptable If the Overall System Rating is Minimally Acceptable If the Overall Sy

The system is active in the RIP and eligible for PL84-99 rehabilitation assistance. 

The system is Active in the RIP during the time that it takes to make needed 

corrections. Active systems are eligible for rehabilitation assistance. However, if the sponsor does not present USACE with proof that serious deficiencies (which had previously resulted in a minimally acceptable system rating) were corrected within the established timeframe, then the system will 

become Inactive in the RIP. 

The system is Inactive in tInactive until the sponsor items rated Unacceptable are ineligible for rehabilita

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-5
Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corpsof Engineers®

I. Reporting: 

After the inspection, the Corps is responsible for assembling an inspection report (or a summary report if it was a Periodic Inspection) including the following inform

a. All sections of the report template used during the inspection, including the cover and pre-inspection materials. (Supplemental data collected, 

weren't used during the inspection do not need to be included with the report.) 

b. Photos of the general system condition and noted deficiencies. c. A plan view drawing of the system, with stationing, to reference locations of items rated less than acceptable. 

d. The relative importance of the identified maintenance issues should be specified in the transmittal letter. 

e. If the Overall System Rating is Minimally Acceptable, the report needs to establish a timeframe for correction of serious deficiencies noted (n

that if these items are not corrected within the required timeframe, the system will be rated as Unacceptable and made Inactive in the Rehabilit

J. Notification: 

Reports are to be disseminated as follows within 30 days of the inspection date. 

If the Overall System Rating is Acceptable If the Overall System Rating is Minimally Acceptable If the Overall Sy

Reports need to be provided to the local sponsor and the county emergency management agency. 

Reports need to be provided to the local sponsor, state emergency management agency, county emergency management agency, and to the FEMA region. 

Reports need to be providemergency management aagency, FEMA region, anwithin 30 days of the insp

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-6
Initial Eligibility 

For use only during Initial Eligibility Inspections of Non-Federally Constructed Flood Damage Reduction Segments / Systems 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/R

A 

The Public Sponsor is a legally constituted public body with full authority and capability to perform the terms of its agreement as the non-Federal partner of the Corps for a segment / system, able to pay damages, if necessary, in the event of its failure to perform. The public sponsor may be a State, County, City, Town, Federally recognized Indian Tribe or tribal organization, Alaska Native Corporation, or any political subpart of a State or group of states that has the legal and financial authority and capability to provide the necessary cash contributions and the lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, borrow, and dredged or excavated materials disposal areas (LERRD's) necessary for the segment / system, and who could legally hold and save the Federal government free from damages that could potentially arise during post-flood rehabilitations or other work on the segment / system. 

1. Public Sponsor 

(A or U only) 

U The segment / system does not have a public sponsor as defined above. A 2. Flood Protection The principal function of the segment / system is to protect people or property from floods. (A or U only) U 

The segment / system was built or is primarily used for channel alignment, navigation, recreation, 

fish and wildlife, land reclamation, drainage, to protect against land erosion or tidal inflows, or for some other non-flood related purpose. 

A 3. Segment / Segment / System construction is fully completed. 

System Completion (A or U only) U The segment / system is still under construction. 

A 

Appropriate local, State, tribal, and/or Federal permits (right-of-way, easements, regulatory permits, etc.), or waivers thereof, have been obtained for FDR segment / system construction and subsequent modifications. The segment / system was constructed in accordance with all applicable Federal, state and local codes, ordinances, and applicable laws. 

4. Construction 

Compliance (A or U only) 

U 

The appropriate permits (or waivers thereof) have not been obtained for the segment / system, or the segment / system was not constructed in accordance with applicable codes, ordinances, and laws. 

A In the case of a levee segment / system, the levee is a primary levee or is a secondary levee which is designed to protect human life. U The levee is a secondary levee and was not designed to protect human life. 

5. Primary Levee 

N/A The FDR segment / system is not a levee segment / system. 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-7
Initial Eligibility 

For use only during Initial Eligibility Inspections of Non-Federally Constructed Flood Damage Reduction Segments / Systems 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/R

A 

• Urban Levees and Floodwalls- Minimum elevation corresponding to a flood level with 10% probability of occurring in a given year (10-year flood). • Agricultural Levees and Floodwalls- Minimum elevation corresponding to a flood level with 20% probability of occurring in a given year (5-year flood). • Flood Damage Reduction Channels- Minimum capacity is for a flood with a 10% probability of occurring in a given year (10-year flood). Improved channels must additionally provide drainage for at least 1.5 square miles of land and have a capacity of at least 800 cfs. (Interior drainage channels within the protected area of a levee segment / system are not considered to be flood damage reduction channels under the RIP.) 

6. Minimum 

Elevation1

(A or U only) 

U 

The FDR segment / system does not meet requirements for minimum elevation, capacity, or drainage area. 

A 

The physical location, cross section, and other design elements of the FDR system are sufficient to provide reliable flood protection. The FDR segment / system forms a properly closed segment / system. See Table 5-4, EP 500-1-1. 

7. Physical 

Location and Cross Section (A or U only) 

U 

The FDR segment / system was not constructed in an appropriate location, does not have an appropriate cross section, is not a properly closed segment / system, or has other shortcomings with design elements necessary for providing reliable flood damage reduction. 

A 

Embankment fill material is uniform and adequately compacted throughout the entire FDR segment / system, and the type of embankment material is suitable to prevent slides and seepage problems. 

8. Embankment Fill 

Material2

U 

Embankment fill material is not uniform, or there is no compaction and evidence indicates a need for compaction, or the type of embankment material is unsuitable and is likely to contribute to the development of slides or seepage problems. 

A Foundation material and construction methods adequately address piping, sand boils, seepage, or settlements that would reduce the level of protection. 9. Foundations2U 

Foundation material and construction methods are such that excessive uncontrolled seepage, sand boils, and piping will occur. Performance history indicates significant uncontrolled seepage, sand boils or piping. 

A 

Erosion protection is capable of handling the designed flow velocity for the level of protection for the entire FDR segment / system. The FDR segment / system is protected against bank caving and slides in all necessary areas, and has adequate drainage to protect FDR segment / system slopes from runoff erosion. 

10. Erosion Control 

U Erosion protection is not present and there is evidence indicating a need for erosion protection. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-8
Initial Eligibility 

ly during Initial Eligibility Inspections of Non-Federally Constructed Flood Damage Reduction Segments / Systems 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

For use on

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/R

A 

Given the level of protection provided by the FDR system, interior drainage structures are 

appropriately sized, situated, and constructed to move anticipated runoff and seepage out of the 

protected area. Pump stations will not become inundated during regular operation and their power system is adequately designed and reliable. 

U 

Interior drainage structures are undersized, poorly constructed, poorly situated, or unreliably 

designed. 

11. Interior Drainage 

System3

(including culverts, gates, pump stations) 

N/A The issue of interior drainage does not apply to this type of FDR segment / system. 

12. Structures A Structures are designed and constructed to withstand anticipated loadings. 3

U Structures are unreliably designed or inadequately constructed. 

1 Depending on available data and local Corps policy, the minimum elevation required may be calculated using traditional methods, with the addition o

agricultural areas and 2 feet of freeboard in urban areas, or using annual exceedance probability, which numerically accounts for the natural variation 

estimating discharge-probability and stage-discharge functions so that additional requirements for elevation are based on the level of uncertainty in th

2 This item should be evaluated based on a review of performance history. If this is not available, some form of engineering assessment is required. 3 Documentation (plans, at a minimum) required for any necessary engineering evaluation is to be provided by the public sponsor.Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-9
General Items for All Flood Damage Reduction Segments / Systems 

For use during all inspections of all Flood Damage Reduction Segments / Systems 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

General Items for A

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System 

Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

A 

Levee Owner's Manual, O&M Manuals, and/or manufacturer's operating instructions are 

present. 

M 

Sponsor manuals are lost or missing or out of date; however, sponsor will obtain manuals prior to next scheduled inspection. 

1. Operations and 

Maintenance Manuals 

U Sponsor has not obtained lost or missing manuals identified during previous inspection. A 

The sponsor maintains a stockpile of sandbags, shovels, and other flood fight supplies which will adequately supply all needs for the initial days of a flood fight. Sponsor determines 

required quantity of supplies after consulting with inspector. 

2. Emergency 

Supplies and Equipment (A or M only) 

M The sponsor does not maintain an adequate supply of flood fighting materials as part of their preparedness activities. 

A 

Sponsor has a written system-specific flood response plan and a solid understanding of how to 

operate, maintain, and staff the FDR system during a flood. Sponsor maintains a list of emergency contact information for appropriate personnel and other emergency response agencies. 

3. Flood 

Preparedness and Training (A or M only) 

M 

The sponsor maintains a good working knowledge of flood response activities, but documentation of system-specific emergency procedures and emergency contact personnel is insufficient or out of date. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-10
Levee Embankments 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of levee segments / systems 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

A 

The levee has little or no unwanted vegetation (trees, bush, or undesirable weeds), except for 

vegetation that is properly contained and/or situated on overbuilt sections, such that the mandatory 3-foot root-free zone is preserved around the levee profile. The levee has been recently mowed. The vegetation-free zone extends 15 feet from both the landside and riverside toes of the levee to the centerline of the tree. If the levee access easement doesn't extend to the described limits, then the vegetation-free zone must be maintained to the easement limits. Reference EM 1110-2-301 or Corps policy for regional vegetation variance. 

M 

Minimal vegetation growth (brush, weeds, or trees 2 inches in diameter or smaller) is present 

within the zones described above. This vegetation must be removed but does not currently threaten the operation or integrity of the levee. 

1. Unwanted 

Vegetation Growth1

U 

Significant vegetation growth (brush, weeds, or any trees greater than 2 inches in diameter) is 

present within the zones described above and must to be removed to reestablish or ascertain levee integrity. 

A There is good coverage of sod over the levee. 

M 

Approximately 25% of the sod cover is missing or damaged over a significant portion or over 

significant portions of the levee embankment. This may be the result of over-grazing or feeding on the levee, unauthorized vehicular traffic, chemical or insect problems, or burning during inappropriate seasons. 

U Over 50% of the sod cover is missing or damaged over a significant portion or portions of the levee embankment. 

2. Sod Cover 

N/A Surface protection is provided by other means. 

A 

No trash, debris, unauthorized farming activity, structures, excavations, or other obstructions 

present within the easement area. Encroachments have been previously reviewed by the Corps, and it was determined that they do not diminish proper functioning of the levee. 

M 

Trash, debris, unauthorized farming activity, structures, excavations, or other obstructions present, or inappropriate activities noted that should be corrected but will not inhibit operations and maintenance or emergency operations. Encroachments have not been reviewed by the Corps. 

3. Encroachments 

U Unauthorized encroachments or inappropriate activities noted are likely to inhibit operations and maintenance, emergency operations, or negatively impact the integrity of the levee. 

4. Closure Structures 

(Stop Log, Earthen Closures, Gates, or Sandbag 

A 

Closure structure in good repair. Placing equipment, stoplogs, and other materials are readily 

available at all times. Components are clearly marked and installation instructions/ procedures readily available. Trial erections have been accomplished in accordance with the O&M Manual. 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-11
Levee Embankments 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of levee segments / systems 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

U 

Any of the following issues is cause for this rating: Closure structure in poor condition. Parts missing or corroded. Placing equipment may not be available within the anticipated warning 

time. The storage vaults cannot be opened during the time of inspection. Components of closure are not clearly marked and installation instructions/ procedures are not readily available. Trial erections have not been accomplished in accordance with the O&M Manual. 

Closures) (A or U only) 

N/A There are no closure structures along this component of the FDR segment / system. 

A No slides, sloughs, tension cracking, slope depressions, or bulges are present. 

M Minor slope stability problems that do not pose an immediate threat to the levee embankment.

5. Slope Stability 

U Major slope stability problems (ex. deep seated sliding) identified that must be repaired to reestablish the integrity of the levee embankment. A No erosion or bank caving is observed on the landward or riverward sides of the levee that might endanger its stability. 

M There are areas where minor erosion is occurring or has occurred on or near the levee embankment, but levee integrity is not threatened. 

6. Erosion/ Bank 

Caving 

U 

Erosion or caving is occurring or has occurred that threatens the stability and integrity of the 

levee. The erosion or caving has progressed into the levee section or into the extended footprint of the levee foundation and has compromised the levee foundation stability. 

A No observed depressions in crown. Records exist and indicate no unexplained historical changes. 

M Minor irregularities that do not threaten integrity of levee. Records are incomplete or inclusive. 

7. Settlement2

U Obvious variations in elevation over significant reaches. No records exist or records indicate that design elevation is compromised. A 

There are scattered, shallow ruts, pot holes, or other depressions on the levee that are unrelated to levee settlement. The levee crown, embankments, and access road crowns are 

well established and drain properly without any ponded water. 

M There are some infrequent minor depressions less than 6 inches deep in the levee crown, embankment, or access roads that will pond water. 

8. Depressions/ 

Rutting 

U There are depressions greater than 6 inches deep that will pond water. A Minor longitudinal, transverse, or desiccation cracks with no vertical movement along the crack. No cracks extend continuously through the levee crest. 9. Cracking 

M 

Longitudinal and/or transverse cracks up to 6 inches in depth with no vertical movement along 

the crack. No cracks extend continuously through the levee crest. Longitudinal cracks are no longer than the height of the levee. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-12
Levee Embankments 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of levee segments / systems 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

U 

Cracks exceed 6 inches in depth. Longitudinal cracks are longer than the height of the levee and/or exhibit vertical movement along the crack. Transverse cracks extend through the entire 

levee width. 

A Continuous animal burrow control program in place that includes the elimination of active burrowing and the filling in of existing burrows. 

M 

The existing animal burrow control program needs to be improved. Several burrows are present which may lead to seepage or slope stability problems, and they require immediate 

attention. 

10. Animal Control 

U 

Animal burrow control program is not effective or is nonexistent. Significant maintenance is 

required to fill existing burrows, and the levee will not provide reliable flood protection until this maintenance is complete. 

A 

There are no breaks, holes, cracks in the discharge pipes/ culverts that would result in significant water leakage. The pipe shape is still essentially circular. All joints appear to be closed and the soil tight. Corrugated metal pipes, if present, are in good condition with 100% of the original coating still in place (either asphalt or galvanizing) or have been relined with appropriate material, which is still in good condition. Condition of pipes has been verified using television camera video taping or visual inspection methods within the past five years, and the report for every pipe is available for review by the inspector.

M 

There are a small number of corrosion pinholes or cracks that could leak water and need to be repaired, but the entire length of pipe is still structurally sound and is not in danger of collapsing. Pipe shape may be ovalized in some locations but does not appear to be approaching a curvature reversal. A limited number of joints may have opened and soil loss may be beginning. Any open joints should be repaired prior to the next inspection. Corrugated metal pipes, if present, may be showing corrosion and pinholes but there are no areas with total section loss. Condition of pipes has been verified using television camera video taping or visual inspection methods within the past five years, and the report for every 

pipe is available for review by the inspector.

U 

Culvert has deterioration and/or has significant leakage; it is in danger of collapsing or as already begun to collapse. Corrugated metal pipes have suffered 100% section loss in the invert. HOWEVER: Even if pipes appear to be in good condition, as judged by an external visual inspection, an Unacceptable Rating will be assigned if the condition of pipes has not been verified using television camera video taping or visual inspection methods within the 

past five years, and reports for all pipes are not available for review by the inspector.

11. Culverts/ 

Discharge Pipes3

(This item includes both concrete and corrugated metal pipes.) 

N/A There are no discharge pipes/ culverts. 

12. Riprap 

Revetments & A No riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to the integrity of channel bank. Riprap intact with no woody vegetation present. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-13
Levee Embankments 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of levee segments / systems 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

M 

Minor riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the channel bank. Unwanted vegetation must be cleared or sprayed with an appropriate herbicide. 

U 

Significant riprap displacement, exposure of bedding, or stone degradation observed. Scour activity is undercutting banks, eroding embankments, or impairing channel flows by causing turbulence or shoaling. Rock protection is hidden by dense brush, trees, or grasses. 

Bank Protection 

N/A There is no riprap protecting this feature of the segment / system, or riprap is discussed in another section. 

A Existing revetment protection is properly maintained, undamaged, and clearly visible. 

M 

Minor revetment displacement or deterioration that does not pose an immediate threat to the 

integrity of the levee. Unwanted vegetation must be cleared or sprayed with an appropriate herbicide. 

U 

Significant revetment displacement, deterioration, or exposure of bedding observed. Scour activity is undercutting banks, eroding embankments, or impairing channel flows by causing turbulence or shoaling. Revetment protection is hidden by dense brush and trees. 

13. Revetments other 

than Riprap 

N/A There are no such revetments protecting this feature of the segment / system. 

A 

Toe drainage systems and pressure relief wells necessary for maintaining FDR segment /

system stability during high water functioned properly during the last flood event and no sediment is observed in horizontal system (if applicable). Nothing is observed which would indicate that the drainage systems won't function properly during the next flood, and maintenance records indicate regular cleaning. Wells have been pumped tested within the 

past 5 years and documentation is provided.

M 

Toe drainage systems or pressure relief wells are damaged and may become clogged if they are not repaired. Maintenance records are incomplete or indicate irregular cleaning and pump 

testing. 

U 

Toe drainage systems or pressure relief wells necessary for maintaining FDR segment /

system stability during flood events have fallen into disrepair or have become clogged. No maintenance records. No documentation of the required pump testing.

14. Underseepage 

Relief Wells/ Toe Drainage Systems 

N/A There are no relief wells/ toe drainage systems along this component of the FDR segment / system. 

A No evidence or history of unrepaired seepage, saturated areas, or boils.

M Evidence or history of minor unrepaired seepage or small saturated areas at or beyond the landside toe but not on the landward slope of levee. No evidence of soil transport. 

15. Seepage 

U Evidence or history of active seepage, extensive saturated areas, or boils. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-14
Levee Embankments 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of levee segments / systems 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

1 If there is significant growth on the levee that inhibits the inspection of animal burrows or other items, the inspection should be ended until this item 2 Detailed survey elevations are normally required during Periodic Inspections, and whenever there are obvious visual settlements. 3 The decision on whether or not USACE inspectors should enter a pipe to perform a detailed inspection must be made at the USACE District level. T

in conjunction with the District Safety Office, as pipes may be considered confined spaces. This decision should consider the age of the pipe, the diam

condition of the pipe, and the length of the pipe. If a pipe is entered for the purposes of inspection, the inspector should record observations with a vidcondition of the entire pipe, including all joints, can later be assessed. Additionally, the video record provides a baseline to which future inspections c

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-15
Floodwalls 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of all floodwalls 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

A 

A grass-only or paved zone is maintained on both sides of the floodwall, free of all trees, 

brush, and undesirable weeds. The vegetation-free zone extends 15 feet from both the land and riverside of the floodwall, at ground-level, to the centerline of the tree. Additionally, an 8-foot root-free zone is maintained around the entire structure, including the floodwall toe, heel, and any toe-drains. If the floodwall access easement doesn't extend to the described limits, then the vegetation-free zone must be maintained to the easement limits. Reference EM 1110-2-301 and/or Corps policy for regional vegetation variance. 

M 

Minimal vegetation growth (brush, weeds, or trees 2 inches in diameter or smaller) is present 

within the zones described above. This vegetation must be removed but does not currently threaten the operation or integrity of the floodwall. 

1. Unwanted 

Vegetation Growth1

U 

Significant vegetation growth (brush, weeds, or any trees greater than 2 inches in diameter) is 

present within the zones described above. This vegetation threatens the operation or integrity of the floodwall and must be removed. 

A 

No trash, debris, unauthorized structures, excavations, or other obstructions present within the easement area. Encroachments have been previously reviewed by the Corps, and it was 

determined that they do not diminish proper functioning of the floodwall. 

M 

Trash, debris, unauthorized structures, excavations, or other obstructions present, or 

inappropriate activities noted that should be corrected but will not inhibit operations and maintenance or emergency operations. Encroachments have not been reviewed by the Corps. 

2. Encroachments 

U Unauthorized encroachments or inappropriate activities noted are likely to inhibit operations and maintenance, emergency operations, or negatively impact the integrity of the floodwall. A 

Closure structure in good repair. Placing equipment, stoplogs, and other materials are readily 

available at all times. Components are clearly marked and installation instructions/ procedures readily available. Trial erections have been accomplished in accordance with the O&M Manual. 

U 

Any of the following issues is cause for this rating: Closure structure in poor condition. Parts missing or corroded. Placing equipment may not be available within the anticipated warning 

time. The storage vaults cannot be opened during the time of inspection. Components of closure are not clearly marked and installation instructions/ procedures are not readily available. Trial erections have not been accomplished in accordance with the O&M Manual. 

3. Closure Structures 

(Stop Log Closures and Gates) (A or U only) 

N/A There are no closure structures along this component of the FDR segment / system. 

A 

Negligible spalling, scaling or cracking. If the concrete surface is weathered or holds moisture, it is still satisfactory but should be seal coated to prevent freeze/ thaw damage. 

4. Concrete Surfaces 

M 

Spalling, scaling, and open cracking present, but the immediate integrity or performance of 

the structure is not threatened. Reinforcing steel may be exposed. Repairs/ sealing is necessary to prevent additional damage during periods of thawing and freezing. 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-16
Floodwalls 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of all floodwalls 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

U 

Surface deterioration or deep cracks present that may result in an unreliable structure. Any surface deterioration that exposes the sheet piling or lies adjacent to monolith joints may indicate underlying reinforcement corrosion and is unacceptable. 

A There are no significant areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement that would endanger the integrity of the structure. 

M 

There are areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement (either active or inactive) that need to be 

repaired. The maximum offset, either laterally or vertically, does not exceed 2 inches unless the movement can be shown to be no longer actively occurring. The integrity of the structure is not in danger. 

5. Tilting, Sliding or 

Settlement of Concrete Structures2

U 

There are areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement (either active or inactive) that threaten the structure's integrity and performance. Any movement that has resulted in failure of the 

waterstop (possibly identified by daylight visible through the joint) is unacceptable. Differential movement of greater than 2 inches between any two adjacent monoliths, either laterally or vertically, is unacceptable unless it can be shown that the movement is no longer active. Also, if the floodwall is of I-wall construction, then any visible or measurable tilting of the wall toward the protected side that has created an open horizontal crack on the riverside base of a monolith is unacceptable. 

A No active erosion, scouring, or bank caving that might endanger the structure's stability. 

M 

There are areas where the ground is eroding towards the base of the structure. Efforts need to 

be taken to slow and repair this erosion, but it is not judged to be close enough to the structure or to be progressing rapidly enough to affect structural stability before the next inspection. For the purposes of inspection, the erosion or scour is not closer to the riverside face of the wall than twice the floodwall's underground base width if the wall is of L-wall or T-wall construction; or if the wall is of sheetpile or I-wall construction, the erosion is not closer than twice the wall's visible height. Additionally, rate of erosion is such that the wall is expected to remain stabile until the next inspection. 

6. Foundation of 

Concrete Structures1

U 

Erosion or bank caving observed that is closer to the wall than the limits described above, or is 

outside these limits but may lead to structural instabilities before the next inspection. Additionally, if the floodwall is of I-wall or sheetpile construction, the foundation is unacceptable if any turf, soil or pavement material got washed away from the landside of the I-wall as the result of a previous overtopping event. 

A 

The joint material is in good condition. The exterior joint sealant is intact and cracking/ 

desiccation is minimal. Joint filler material and/or waterstop is not visible at any point. 

7. Monolith Joints 

M 

The joint material has appreciable deterioration to the point where joint filler material and/or waterstop is visible in some locations. This needs to be repaired or replaced to prevent spalling and cracking during freeze/ thaw cycles, and to ensure water tightness of the joint. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-17
Floodwalls 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of all floodwalls 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

U 

The joint material is severely deteriorated or the concrete adjacent to the monolith joints has 

spalled and cracked, damaging the waterstop; in either case damage has occurred to the point where it is apparent that the joint is no longer watertight and will not provide the intended level of protection during a flood. 

N/A There are no monolith joints in the floodwall. 

A 

Toe drainage systems and pressure relief wells necessary for maintaining FDR segment / 

system stability during high water functioned properly during the last flood event and no sediment is observed in horizontal system (if applicable). Nothing is observed which would indicate that the drainage systems won't function properly during the next flood, and maintenance records indicate regular cleaning. Wells have been pumped tested within the past 5 years and documentation is provided. 

M 

Toe drainage systems or pressure relief wells are damaged and may become clogged if they are not repaired. Maintenance records are incomplete or indicate irregular cleaning and pump 

testing. 

U 

Toe drainage systems or pressure relief wells necessary for maintaining FDR segment / system stability during flood events have fallen into disrepair or have become clogged. No maintenance records. No documentation of the required pump testing. 

8. Underseepage 

Relief Wells/ Toe Drainage Systems 

N/A There are no relief wells/ toe drainage systems along this component of the FDR segment / system. 

A No evidence or history of unrepaired seepage, saturated areas, or boils. 

M 

Evidence or history of minor unrepaired seepage or small saturated areas at or beyond the 

landside toe but not on the landward slope of levee. No evidence of soil transport. 

9. Seepage 

U Evidence or history of active seepage, extensive saturated areas, or boils. 

1 Inspectors must have as-built drawings available during the inspection so that the lateral distance to the heel and toe of the floodwalls can be determi2 The sponsor should be monitoring any observed movement to verify whether the movement is active or inactive. Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-18
Interior Drainage System 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of interior drainage systems 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

A 

No obstructions, vegetation, debris, or sediment accumulation noted within interior drainage 

channels or blocking the culverts, inlets, or discharge areas. Concrete joints and weep holes are free of grass and weeds. 

M 

Obstructions, vegetation, debris, or sediment are minor and have not impaired channel flow 

capacity or blocked more than 10% of any culvert openings, but should be removed. A limited volume of grass and weeds may be present in concrete channel joints and weep holes. 

1. Vegetation and 

Obstructions 

U 

Obstructions, vegetation, debris, or sediment have impaired the channel flow capacity or blocked more than 10% of a culvert opening. Sediment and debris removal required to reestablish flow capacity. 

A 

No trash, debris, unauthorized structures, excavations, or other obstructions present within the easement area. Encroachments have been previously reviewed by the Corps, and it was 

determined that they do not diminish proper functioning of the interior drainage system. 

M 

Trash, debris, unauthorized structures, excavations, or other obstructions present, or 

inappropriate activities noted that should be corrected but will not inhibit operations and maintenance or emergency operations. Encroachments have not been reviewed by the Corps. 

2. Encroachments 

U 

Unauthorized encroachments or inappropriate activities noted are likely to inhibit operations 

and maintenance, emergency operations, or negatively impact the integrity of this component of the interior drainage system. 

A No trash, debris, structures, or other obstructions present within the ponding areas. Sediment deposits do not exceed 10% of capacity. 

M 

Trash, debris, excavations, structures, or other obstructions present, or inappropriate activities 

that will not inhibit operations and maintenance. Sediment deposits do not exceed 30% of capacity. 

U 

Trash, debris, excavations, structures, or other obstructions, or other encroachments or 

activities noted that will inhibit operations, maintenance, or emergency work. Sediment deposits exceeds 30% of capacity. 

3. Ponding Areas 

N/A There are no ponding areas associated with the interior drainage system. 

A Fencing is in good condition and provides protection against falling or unauthorized access. Gates open and close freely, locks are in place, and there is little corrosion on metal parts. 

M Fencing or gates are damaged or corroded but appear to be maintainable. Locks may be missing or damaged. 

U Fencing and gates are damaged or corroded to the point that replacement is required, or potentially dangerous features are not secured. 

4. Fencing and 

Gates1

N/A There are no features noted that require safety fencing. 

5. Concrete Surfaces 

(Such as gate A Negligible spalling, scaling or cracking. If the concrete surface is weathered or holds moisture, it is still satisfactory but should be seal coated to prevent freeze/ thaw damage. 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-19
Interior Drainage System 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of interior drainage systems 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

M 

Spalling, scaling, and open cracking present, but the immediate integrity or performance of 

the structure is not threatened. Reinforcing steel may be exposed. Repairs/ sealing is necessary to prevent additional damage during periods of thawing and freezing. 

U 

Surface deterioration or deep cracks present that may result in an unreliable structure. Any surface deterioration that exposes the sheet piling or lies adjacent to monolith joints may indicate underlying reinforcement corrosion and is unacceptable. 

wells, outfalls, intakes, or culverts) 

N/A There are no concrete items in the interior drainage system. 

A There are no significant areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement that would endanger the integrity of the structure. 

M 

There are areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement (either active or inactive) that need to be 

repaired. The maximum offset, either laterally or vertically, does not exceed 2 inches unless the movement can be shown to be no longer actively occurring. The integrity of the structure is not in danger. 

U 

There are areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement (either active or inactive) that threaten the structure's integrity and performance. Any movement that has resulted in failure of the 

waterstop (possibly identified by daylight visible through the joint) is unacceptable. Differential movement of greater than 2 inches between any two adjacent monoliths, either laterally or vertically, is unacceptable unless it can be shown that the movement is no longer active. Also, if the floodwall is of I-wall construction, then any visible or measurable tilting of the wall toward the protected side that has created an open horizontal crack on the riverside base of a monolith is unacceptable. 

6. Tilting, Sliding or 

Settlement of Concrete and Sheet Pile Structures2 

(Such as gate wells, outfalls, intakes, or culverts) 

N/A There are no concrete items in the interior drainage system. 

A No active erosion, scouring, or bank caving that might endanger the structure's stability. 

M 

There are areas where the ground is eroding towards the base of the structure. Efforts need to 

be taken to slow and repair this erosion, but it is not judged to be close enough to the structure or to be progressing rapidly enough to affect structural stability before the next inspection. The rate of erosion is such that the structure is expected to remain stabile until the next inspection. 

U Erosion or bank caving observed that may lead to structural instabilities before the next inspection. 

7. Foundation of 

Concrete Structures3

(Such as culverts, inlet and discharge structures, or gatewells.) 

N/A There are no concrete items in the interior drainage system. 

A The joint material is in good condition. The exterior joint sealant is intact and cracking/ desiccation is minimal. Joint filler material and/or waterstop is not visible at any point. 8. Monolith Joints 

M 

The joint material has appreciable deterioration to the point where joint filler material and/or waterstop is visible in some locations. This needs to be repaired or replaced to prevent spalling and cracking during freeze/ thaw cycles, and to ensure water tightness of the joint. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-20
Interior Drainage System 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of interior drainage systems 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

U 

The joint material is severely deteriorated or the concrete adjacent to the monolith joints has 

spalled and cracked, damaging the waterstop; in either case damage has occurred to the point where it is apparent that the joint is no longer watertight and will not provide the intended level of protection during a flood. 

N/A There are no monolith joints in the interior drainage system. 

A 

There are no breaks, holes, cracks in the discharge pipes/ culverts that would result in 

significant water leakage. The pipe shape is still essentially circular. All joints appear to be closed and the soil tight. Corrugated metal pipes, if present, are in good condition with 100% of the original coating still in place (either asphalt or galvanizing) or have been relined with appropriate material, which is still in good condition. Condition of pipes has been verified using television camera video taping or visual inspection methods within the past five years, and the report for every pipe is available for review by the inspector. 

M 

There are a small number of corrosion pinholes or cracks that could leak water and need to be 

repaired, but the entire length of pipe is still structurally sound and is not in danger of collapsing. Pipe shape may be ovalized in some locations but does not appear to be approaching a curvature reversal. A limited number of joints may have opened and soil loss may be beginning. Any open joints should be repaired prior to the next inspection. Corrugated metal pipes, if present, may be showing corrosion and pinholes but there are no areas with total section loss. Condition of pipes has been verified using television camera video taping or visual inspection methods within the past five years, and the report for every pipe is available for review by the inspector. 

U 

Culvert has deterioration and/or has significant leakage; it is in danger of collapsing or as 

already begun to collapse. Corrugated metal pipes have suffered 100% section loss in the invert. HOWEVER: Even if pipes appear to be in good condition, as judged by an external visual inspection, an Unacceptable Rating will be assigned if the condition of pipes has not been verified using television camera video taping or visual inspection methods within the past five years, and reports for all pipes are not available for review by the inspector. 

9. Culverts/ 

Discharge Pipes4

N/A There are no discharge pipes/ culverts. 

A 

Gates open and close freely to a tight seal or minor leakage. Gate operators are in good 

working condition and are properly maintained. Sill is free of sediment and other obstructions. Gates and lifters have been maintained and are free of corrosion. Documentation provided during the inspection. 

M 

Gates and/or operators have been damaged or have minor corrosion, and open and close with resistance or binding. Leakage quantity is controllable, but maintenance is required. Sill is 

free of sediment and other obstructions. 

U Gates do not open or close and/or operators do not function. Gate, stem, lifter and/or guides may be damaged or have major corrosion. 

10. Sluice / Slide 

Gates5

N/A There are no sluice/ slide gates. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-21
Interior Drainage System 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of interior drainage systems 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

A Gates/ valves open and close easily with minimal leakage, have no corrosion damage, and have been exercised and lubricated as required. 

M Gates/ valves will not fully open or close because of obstructions that can be easily removed, or have minor corrosion damage that requires maintenance. 

U Gates/ valves are missing, have been damaged, or have deteriorated to the point that they need to be replaced. 

11. Flap Gates/ 

Flap Valves/ Pinch Valves1

N/A There are no flap gates. 

A Trash racks are fastened in place and properly maintained. 

M 

Trash racks are in place but are unfastened or have bent bars that allow debris to enter into the pipe or pump station, bars are corroded to the point that up to 10% of the sectional area may 

be lost. Repair or replacement is required. 

U Trash racks are missing or damaged to the extent that they are no longer functional and must be replaced. (For example, more than 10% of the sectional area may be lost.) 

12. Trash Racks 

(non-mechanical) 

N/A There are no trash racks, or they are covered in the pump stations section of the report. 

A All metal parts are protected from corrosion damage and show no rust, damage, or deterioration that would cause a safety concern. 

M Corrosion seen on metallic parts appears to be maintainable. 

U Metallic parts are severely corroded and require replacement to prevent failure, equipment damage, or safety issues. 

13. Other Metallic 

Items 

N/A There are no other significant metallic items. 

A No riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to the integrity of channel bank. Riprap intact with no woody vegetation present. 

M 

Minor riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the channel bank. Unwanted vegetation must be cleared or sprayed with an appropriate herbicide. 

U 

Significant riprap displacement, exposure of bedding, or stone degradation observed. Scour activity is undercutting banks, eroding embankments, or impairing channel flows by causing turbulence or shoaling. Rock protection is hidden by dense brush, trees, or grasses. 

14. Riprap 

Revetments of Inlet/ Discharge Areas 

N/A There is no riprap protecting this feature of the segment / system, or riprap is discussed in another section. 

15. Revetments other 

than Riprap A No riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to the integrity of channel bank. Riprap intact with no woody vegetation present. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-22
Interior Drainage System 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of interior drainage systems 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

M 

Minor riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the channel bank. Unwanted vegetation must be cleared or sprayed with an appropriate herbicide. 

U 

Significant riprap displacement, exposure of bedding, or stone degradation observed. Scour 

activity is undercutting banks, eroding embankments, or impairing channel flows by causing turbulence or shoaling. Rock protection is hidden by dense brush, trees, or grasses. 

N/A There are no such revetments protecting this feature of the segment / system. 

1 Proper operation of this item must be demonstrated during the inspection. 2 The sponsor should be monitoring any observed movement to verify whether the movement is active or inactive. 3 Inspectors must have as-built drawings available during the inspection so that the lateral distance to the heel and toe of the floodwalls can be determi4 The decision on whether or not USACE inspectors should enter a pipe to perform a detailed inspection must be made at the USACE District level. T

in conjunction with the District Safety Office, as pipes may be considered confined spaces. This decision should consider the age of the pipe, the diam

condition of the pipe, and the length of the pipe. If a pipe is entered for the purposes of inspection, the inspector should record observations with a vidcondition of the entire pipe, including all joints, can later be assessed. Additionally, the video record provides a baseline to which future inspections c

5 Proper operation of the gates (full open and closed) must be demonstrated during the inspection if no documentation is available. Be aware of both moperators. Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-23
Pump Stations 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of pump stations 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

A 

Operation, maintenance and inspection records are present at the pump station and are being 

used and updated, and personnel have been trained in pump station operations. Names and last training date shown in the record book. 

M Operation, maintenance and inspection records are present but not adequately used and updated. 

1. Pump Stations 

Operating, Maintenance, Training, & Inspection Records 

U No operation, maintenance and inspection records are present, or refresher training for personnel has not been conducted. A 

Operation and Maintenance Equipment Manuals and/or posted operating instructions are 

present and updated as required, and adequately cover all pertinent pump station features. O&M manuals include points of contact for manufacturers and suppliers of major equipment used in the facility. 

M 

Operation and Maintenance Equipment Manuals and/or posted operating instructions are present and adequately cover all pertinent pump station features. However, they are incomplete and the necessary updates have not been made. 

2. Pump Station 

Operations and Maintenance Equipment Manuals 

U Operation and Maintenance Equipment Manuals are not available. A Safety compliance inspection reports by applicable local, state, or federal agencies available for review. 3. Safety Compliance 

M No safety compliance inspection reports are available for review. 

A A telephone, cellular phone, two-way radio, or similar device is available to pump station operator and maintenance personnel. 4. Communications (A or M only) 

M A telephone, cellular phone, two-way radio, or similar device is not available to pump station operator and maintenance personnel. 

A The building is in good structural condition with no major foundation settlement problems. The roof is not leaking, intake & exhaust louvers are clear of debris, fans are operational, etc. 

M 

There are minor structural defects, minimal foundation settlement, leaks, or other conditions noted that need repair. Defects do not threaten the structural integrity or stability of the building, and will not impact pumping operations. 

5. Plant Building 

U The structural integrity or stability of the building is threatened, or there is damage to the building that threatens safety of the operator or impacts pumping operations. A Fencing is in good condition and provides protection against falling or unauthorized access. Gates open and close freely, locks are in place, and there is little corrosion on metal parts. 

M Fencing or gates are damaged or corroded but appear to be maintainable. Locks may be missing or damaged. 

6. Fencing and 

Gates1

U Fencing and gates are damaged or corroded to the point that replacement is required, or potentially dangerous features are not secured. 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-24
Pump Stations 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of pump stations 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

N/A There are no features noted that require safety fencing. 

A 

All pumps are properly maintained and lubricated. Systems are periodically tested and 

documented for review. No vibration, cavitation noises or unusual sounds are noted when the pump is operated. Bearing temperature sensor records don't indicate any problems. 

M 

Minor deficiencies noted that need to be closely monitored or repaired, such as the presence of slight vibrations, leakage of packing gland, bearing temperature sensors are inoperable or no record is present. However, the pumps are operational and are expected to perform through the next period of usage. 

7. Pumps1

U 

Major deficiencies identified that may significantly reduce pumping operations. For example, 

bearing sensor records indicate problems, excessive vibration noted, impellers are badly corroded, or there are eroded or missing blades. 

A 

All items are operational. Preventative maintenance and lubrication is being performed and the system is periodically subjected to performance testing. Instrumentation, alarms, bearing 

sensors and auto shutdowns are operational. 

M Systems have minor deficiencies, but are operational and will function adequately through the next flood. Bearing sensors are not operational. 

8. Motors, Engines, 

Fans, Gear Reducers, Back Stop Devices, etc. 

U One or more of the primary motors or systems is not operational, or noted deficiencies have not been corrected. A Clear of debris, sediment, or other obstructions. Procedures are in place to remove debris accumulation during operation. 

M 

Debris, sediment, or other obstructions may be present and must be removed, but the sump/ wet well will function as intended during the next flood. Procedures are in place to remove debris accumulation during operation. 

9. Sumps / Wet well 

U Large debris or excessive silt present which will hinder or damage pumps during operation, or no procedures established to remove debris accumulation during operation. A Drive chain, bearing, gear reducers, and other components are in good operating condition and are being properly maintained. 

M The trash rake is in need of maintenance, but is still operational. 

U Trash rake not operational or deficiencies will inhibit operations during the next flood event. 

10. Mechanical 

Operating Trash Rakes1

N/A There are no mechanical trash rakes. 

A Trash racks are fastened in place and properly maintained. 11. Non-Mechanical Trash Racks 

M 

Trash racks are in place but are unfastened or have bent bars that allow debris to enter into the pipe or pump station, bars are corroded to the point that up to 10% of the sectional area may be lost. Repair or replacement is required. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-25
Pump Stations 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of pump stations 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

U Trash racks are missing or damaged to the extent that they are no longer functional and must be replaced. (For example, more than 10% of the sectional area may be lost.) 

N/A There are no trash racks, or they are covered in the pump stations section of the report. 

A Fuel system is operational, day tank present and operational, fuel fresh and rotated regularly. 

M Fuel system is operational and of adequate capacity, but day tank is missing or fuel is not fresh and rotated regularly. 

U Fuel system not functional. 

12. Fuel System for 

Pump Engines 

N/A No fuel system. 

A 

The normal power source and backup generators, if installed, are operational, properly exercised and well maintained. Surge protection, grounding, lightning protection, 

transformers, and automatic/manual transfer of main power to backup system is working. 

M 

Normal power source and backup units, if applicable, are operational with minor discrepancies or maintenance, inspection and exercising record is present but not up to date. Preventative maintenance or repairs are required. 

13. Power Source 

U Normal power source or generators are not operational and must be repaired; or generator, if required, is not on site. A Operational and maintained free of damage, corrosion, and debris. Preventative maintenance and system testing is being performed periodically. 

M Operational with minor discrepancies. Preventative maintenance or repairs are required, but the components are expected to function adequately during the next flood event. 

14. Electrical 

Systems2

U Components of the electrical system will not function adequately during the next flood event and must be replaced. A Results of megger tests on pump motors or critical power cables show that the insulation meets manufacturer's or industry standards. Tested within the last year. 

M 

Megger testing not conducted within the past year. If megger tests on pump motors indicate that insulation resistance is below the manufacturer's or industry standard, but the resistance can be corrected with proper application of heat, this is minimally acceptable. (The application of heat does not relate to critical power cables.) 

15. Megger Testing 

on Pump Motors and Critical Power Cables 

U 

Megger tests not conducted within past two years, or tests indicate that insulation resistance is low enough that the equipment will not be able to meet design standards of operation; or evidence of arcing or shorting is detected visually. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-26
Pump Stations 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of pump stations 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

A All enclosures, panels, conduits, and ducts are protected from corrosion damage and show no rust, damage, or deterioration that would cause a safety concern. 

M Minor surface corrosion which appears to be maintainable. Cleaning and painting required. 

16. Enclosures, 

Panels, Conduit and Ducts 

U Severely corroded and must be replaced to prevent failure, equipment damage, or safety issues. A Intake and discharge pipelines have no corrosion and paint is intact, except for minor touch up required. Pipe couplings and anchors have no leakage or corrosion. 

M Intake and discharge pipelines have minor corrosion and repair and painting is required. Pipe coupling with anchors have minor leakage, corrosion and require bolts to be tightened. 

17. Intake and 

Discharge Pipelines 

U Intake and discharge pipelines have major corrosion and replacement is required. Pipe coupling with anchors have major leakage and is heavily corroded and requires replacement. A 

Gates open and close freely to a tight seal or minor leakage. Gate operators are in good working condition and are properly maintained. Sill is free of sediment and other obstructions. Gates and lifters have been maintained and are free of corrosion. Documentation provided during the inspection. 

M 

Gates and/or operators have been damaged or have minor corrosion, and open and close with resistance or binding. Leakage quantity is controllable, but maintenance is required. Sill is free of sediment and other obstructions. 

U Gates do not open or close and/or operators do not function. Gate, stem, lifter and/or guides may be damaged or have major corrosion. 

18. Sluice/ Slide 

Gates3

N/A There are no sluice/ slide gates. 

A Gates/ valves open and close easily with minimal leakage, have no corrosion damage, and have been exercised and lubricated as required. 

M Gates/ valves will not fully open or close because of obstructions that can be easily removed, or have minor corrosion damage that requires maintenance. 

U Gates/ valves are missing, have been damaged, or have deteriorated to the point that they need to be replaced. 

19. Flap Gates/ 

Flap Valves/ Pinch Valves1

N/A There are no gates on discharge lines from pump station. 

20. Cranes1

A Cranes operational and have been inspected and load tested in accordance with applicable standards within the last year. Documentation is on hand. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-27
Pump Stations 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of pump stations 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

M Cranes have not been inspected or operationally tested within the past year, or there are visible signs of corrosion, oil leakage, etc, requiring maintenance. 

U Cranes are not operational, and this may prevent the pump station from functioning as required. No documentation available on cranes. 

N/A There are no cranes. 

A All metal parts are protected from corrosion damage and show no rust, damage, or deterioration that would cause a safety concern. 

M Corrosion seen on metallic parts appears to be maintainable. 

U Metallic parts are severely corroded and require replacement to prevent failure, equipment damage, or safety issues. 

21. Other Metallic 

Items (Equipment, Ladders, Platform Anchors, etc) 

N/A There are no other significant metallic items. 

1 Proper operation of this item must be demonstrated during the inspection. 2 Check motor control center, circuit breakers, pilot lights, volt meters, ammeters, sump level indicator, gate position indicators, remote operating syst

telemetry systems. Also, check interior and exterior lighting; especially lighting near trash rack screens, ladders, walkways, etc. 

3 Proper operation of the gates (full open and closed) must be demonstrated during the inspection if no documentation is available. Be aware of both m

operators. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-28
Flood Damage Reduction Channels 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of flood damage reduction channels 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

A No obstructions, vegetation, debris, or sediment accumulation within the channel. Concrete channel joints and weep holes are free of grass and weeds. 

M 

Obstructions (including log jams), vegetation, debris, or sediment are minor and have not 

impaired channel flow capacity, but should be removed. Sediment shoals have not developed to the extent that they can support vegetation other than non-aquatic grasses. A limited volume of grass and weeds may be present in concrete channel joints and weep holes. 

1. Vegetation and 

Obstructions 

U 

Obstructions (including log jams), vegetation, debris or sediment have impaired the channel flow capacity. Sediment shoals are well established and support woody and/or brushy 

vegetation. Sediment and debris removal required to re-establish flow capacity. 

A No shoaling or minor, non-vegetated shoaling is present. 

M 

More widespread vegetated and non-vegetated shoaling is present. Non-aquatic grasses are present on shoal. No trees or brush is present on shoal, and channel flow is not significantly 

reduced. Sediment and debris removal recommended. 

2. Shoaling1

(sediment deposition) 

U 

Shoaling is well established, stabilized by saplings, brush, or other vegetation. Shoals are 

diverting flow to channel walls. Channel flow capacity is reduced and maintenance is required. 

A 

No trash, debris, unauthorized structures, excavations, or other obstructions present within the easement area. Encroachments have been previously reviewed by the Corps, and it was 

determined that they do not diminish proper functioning of the channel. 

M 

Trash, debris, unauthorized structures, excavations, or other obstructions present, or 

inappropriate activities noted that should be corrected but will not inhibit operations and maintenance or emergency operations. Encroachments have not been reviewed by the Corps. 

3. Encroachments 

U Unauthorized encroachments or inappropriate activities noted are likely to inhibit operations and maintenance, emergency operations, or negatively impact the integrity of the channel. A No head cutting or horizontal deviation observed. 

M Head cutting and horizontal deviation evident, but is less than 1 foot from the designed grade or cross section. 

4. Erosion 

U Head cutting and horizontal deviation of more than 1 foot from the designed grade or cross section. Corrective actions required to stop or slow erosion. A Negligible spalling, scaling or cracking. If the concrete surface is weathered or holds moisture, it is still satisfactory but should be seal coated to prevent freeze/ thaw damage. 5. Concrete Surfaces 

M 

Spalling, scaling, and open cracking present, but the immediate integrity or performance of 

the structure is not threatened. Reinforcing steel may be exposed. Repairs/ sealing is necessary to prevent additional damage during periods of thawing and freezing. 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Da

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-29
Flood Damage Reduction Channels 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of flood damage reduction channels 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Da

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

U 

Surface deterioration or deep cracks present that may result in an unreliable structure. Any surface deterioration that exposes the sheet piling or lies adjacent to monolith joints may indicate underlying reinforcement corrosion and is unacceptable. 

N/A There are no concrete items in the channel. 

A There are no significant areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement that would endanger the integrity of the structure. 

M 

There are areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement (either active or inactive) that need to be 

repaired. The maximum offset, either laterally or vertically, does not exceed 2 inches unless the movement can be shown to be no longer actively occurring. The integrity of the structure is not in danger. 

U 

There are areas of tilting, sliding, or settlement (either active or inactive) that threaten the structure's integrity and performance. Any movement that has resulted in failure of the 

waterstop (possibly identified by daylight visible through the joint) is unacceptable. Differential movement of greater than 2 inches between any two adjacent monoliths, either laterally or vertically, is unacceptable unless it can be shown that the movement is no longer active. Also, if the floodwall is of I-wall construction, then any visible or measurable tilting of the wall toward the protected side that has created an open horizontal crack on the riverside base of a monolith is unacceptable. 

6. Tilting, Sliding or 

Settlement of Concrete Structures2

N/A There are no concrete items in the channel. 

A No active erosion, scouring, or bank caving that might endanger the structure's stability. 

M 

There are areas where the ground is eroding towards the base of the structure. Efforts need to 

be taken to slow and repair this erosion, but it is not judged to be close enough to the structure or to be progressing rapidly enough to affect structural stability before the next inspection. For the purposes of inspection, the erosion or scour is not closer to the riverside face of the wall than twice the floodwall's underground base width if the wall is of L-wall or T-wall construction; or if the wall is of sheetpile or I-wall construction, the erosion is not closer than twice the wall's visible height. Additionally, rate of erosion is such that the wall is expected to remain stabile until the next inspection. 

U 

Erosion or bank caving observed that is closer to the wall than the limits described above, or is 

outside these limits but may lead to structural instabilities before the next inspection. Additionally, if the floodwall is of I-wall or sheetpile construction, the foundation is unacceptable if any turf, soil or pavement material got washed away from the landside of the I-wall as the result of a previous overtopping event. 

7. Foundation of 

Concrete Structures3

N/A There are no concrete items in the channel. 

8. Slab and Monolith 

Joints A The joint material is in good condition. The exterior joint sealant is intact and cracking/ desiccation is minimal. Joint filler material and/or waterstop is not visible at any point. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-30
Flood Damage Reduction Channels 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of flood damage reduction channels 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Da

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Rated Item Rating Rating Guidelines Location/Re

M 

The joint material has appreciable deterioration to the point where joint filler material and/or waterstop is visible in some locations. This needs to be repaired or replaced to prevent spalling and cracking during freeze/ thaw cycles, and to ensure water tightness of the joint. 

U 

The joint material is severely deteriorated or the concrete adjacent to the monolith joints has 

spalled and cracked, damaging the waterstop; in either case damage has occurred to the point where it is apparent that the joint is no longer watertight and will not provide the intended level of protection during a flood. 

N/A There are no concrete items in the channel. 

A Gates/ valves open and close easily with minimal leakage, have no corrosion damage, and have been exercised and lubricated as required. 

M Gates/ valves will not fully open or close because of obstructions that can be easily removed, or have minor corrosion damage that requires maintenance. 

U Gates/ valves are missing, have been damaged, or have deteriorated to the point that they need to be replaced. 

9. Flap Gates/ 

Flap Valves/ Pinch Valves4

N/A There are no flap gates. 

A No riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to the integrity of channel bank. Riprap intact with no woody vegetation present. 

M 

Minor riprap displacement or stone degradation that could pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the channel bank. Unwanted vegetation must be cleared or sprayed with an appropriate herbicide. 

U 

Significant riprap displacement, exposure of bedding, or stone degradation observed. Scour 

activity is undercutting banks, eroding embankments, or impairing channel flows by causing turbulence or shoaling. Rock protection is hidden by dense brush, trees, or grasses. 

10. Riprap 

Revetments & Banks 

N/A There is no riprap protecting this feature of the segment / system, or riprap is discussed in another section. 

A Existing revetment protection is properly maintained, undamaged, and clearly visible. 

M 

Minor revetment displacement or deterioration that does not pose an immediate threat to the 

integrity of the levee. Unwanted vegetation must be cleared or sprayed with an appropriate herbicide. 

U 

Significant revetment displacement, deterioration, or exposure of bedding observed. Scour 

activity is undercutting banks, eroding embankments, or impairing channel flows by causing turbulence or shoaling. Revetment protection is hidden by dense brush and trees. 

11. Revetments other 

than Riprap 

N/A There are no such revetments protecting this feature of the segment / system. 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-31
Flood Damage Reduction Channels 

For use during Initial and Continuing Eligibility Inspections of flood damage reduction channels 

Key: A = Acceptable. M = Minimally Acceptable; Maintenance is required. U = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. FDR = Fl

Flood Da

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

1 If weather and flow conditions allow, inspectors should walk in the channel and probe shoal areas in order to estimate extent of blockage of the cross

shoaling is present. 

2 The sponsor should be monitoring any observed movement to verify whether the movement is active or inactive. 3 Inspectors must have as-built drawings available during the inspection so that the lateral distance to the heel and toe of the floodwalls can be determi4 Proper operation of this item must be demonstrated during the inspection. Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-32
Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report 

US Army Corps of Engineers® 

Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System 

Supplemental Data Sheet

This form is intended for the Corps' internal use and may not need to be updated with every inspection. 

Name of Segment / System: 

Sponsor: Location: River Basin: Project Description: Authority that Project was Constructed Under: Date of Construction: Approximate Annual Maintenance Costs: 

Construction: Federally Constructed Non-Federally Constructed Maintenance: Federally Maintained Non-Federally Maintained 

National Flood Insurance Program: 

a. Is the project currently NFIP? Yes No 

b. If in the NFIP, Date of Certification (per 44 CFR 65.10): 

Datum Information: 

a. Datum used for the design and construction of this project is: b. Current recommended datum for this project is: 

c. Has the Project been converted to the current recommended datum? Yes No 

Levee Embankment Data: Protected Features (For use in preparing estimates and PIRs): 

a. Levee Designed Gage Function Reading/Station: a. Total acres protected: b. Level of Protection Provided: b. Total agriculture production acres protected: c. Average Height of Levee: c. Towns: d. Average Crown Width: d. Businesses: e. Average Side Slope: e. Residences: 

f. Roads: g. Utilities: h. Barns: i. Machine Sheds: j. Outbuildings: k. Irrigation Systems: l. Grain Bins: m. Other Facilities: 

Enclosure 2: Flood Damage Reduction Segment / System Inspection Report

B-33
C-1

Enclosure 3: Subset of Inspection Items for Rehabilitation Program Eligibility 

Determination

In order to be eligible, all of the following items must be rated A, M, N/A or Yes.

Note: Item numbers listed below refer to their placement in the Inspection Checklist 

(Enclosure 2). 

Rehabilitation Program Eligibility Determination

Yes Public sponsor provided maintenance information per the Public Sponsor PreNo Inspection Form.

Yes

No Non-federal levee system meets Initial Eligibility criteria.

N/A

If either of the above items is marked “No” the levee system is not eligible. 

Rating Rated Item

Levee Embankments

A

M

U

3. Encroachments

A

U

N/A

4. Closure Structures (Stop Log, Earthen Closures, Gates, or Sandbag 

Closures)

A

M

U

5. Slope Stability

A

M

U

6. Erosion/ Bank Caving

A

M

U

10. Animal Control

A

M

U

N/A

11. Culverts/Discharge Pipes (This item includes both concrete and corrugated 

metal pipes.)

A

M

U

N/A

14. Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe Drainage Systems

Floodwalls

A

M

U

2. Encroachments

A

U

N/A

3. Closure Structures (Stop Log Closures and Gates)

A

M

U

5. Tilting, Sliding, or Settlement of Concrete Structures
C-2

A

M

U

6. Foundation of Concrete Structures

A

M

U

N/A

8. Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe Drainage Systems

Interior Drainage System

A

M

U

N/A

9. Culverts/Discharge Pipes

A

M

U

N/A

10. Sluice/Slide Gates

A

M

U

N/A

11. Flap Gates/Flap Valves/Pinch Valves

Pump Stations

A

M

U

17. Intake and Discharge Pipelines

A

M

U

N/A

18. Sluice/Slide Gates

A

M

U

N/A

19. Flap Gates/Flap Valves/Pinch Valves

Rehabilitation Program Status

Active System meets all interim eligibility criteria, including having received a 

rating of A, M, N/A or Yes for all subset items and is therefore eligible for 

rehabilitation assistance. 

Inactive System does not meet interim eligibility requirements. 

Comments: