alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018298EN.01000101.xml

| 23.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2017-2018 SESSION

Sittings of 3 to 6 April 2017

The Minutes of this session have been published in

  OJ C 17, 18.1.2018
  .

TEXTS ADOPTED

Sittings of 26 and 27 April 2017

The Minutes of this session have been published in

  OJ C 28, 25.1.2018
  .

The texts adopted of 27 April 2017 concerning the discharge for the financial year 2015 have been published in

  OJ L 252, 29.9.2017
  .

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
#### ABG INVESTMENT, INCORPORATED, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Joseph GAZIL and Norma Gazil, his wife; Stanley L. Brumley and Jan Brumley, his wife; and Andrew M. Sciabbarrasi, Jr., and Donna Sciabbarrasi, his wife, Appellees.

No. 69-62.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Benjamin A. HOLLAND, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-44.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 5, 1973.

Benjamin A. Holland, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J, and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant *336having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 192 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 192

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       June 10, 1993.  
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2348) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 
bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the 
bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule and shall be 
considered as read. Points of order under clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI against 
provisions in the bill are waived except as follows: beginning on page 31, line 
20, through page 32, line 2. No amendment shall be in order except those printed 
in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each 
amendment may be offered only in the order printed, may be offered only by the 
named proponent or a designee, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable 
for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the 
proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be 
subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. Points of order under clause 2 of rule XXI against 
amendments printed in the report are waived. At the conclusion of consideration 
of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the 
House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 961

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds for the National Aeronautics

and Space Administration’s Advanced Solid Rocket Motor program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 18, 1993

Mr. KLUG (for himself, Mr. HANSEN, Ms. SHEPHERD and Mr. PENNY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science,

Space, and Technology

A BILL

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds for the National

Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Advanced Solid

Rocket Motor program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ASRM Termination

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION.

7 No Federal funds shall be expended for the National

8 Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Advanced Solid

9 Rocket Motor program, except as is necessary to terminate
2

•HR 961 IH

1 contracts in effect before the date of enactment of this

2 Act.

Æ
Exhibit 15—Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Goodrich Corporation
We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following RegistrationStatements and in their related Prospectuses, of our report datedNovember 2,2004 relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financialstatements of Goodrich Corporation and subsidiaries which are included in itsForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004:     **Registration** ** ** ** ****Number** **Description of Registration Statement** **Filing Date**33-49052 The B.F.Goodrich Company Key Employees’Stock Option Plan — Form S-8 June 26, 1992     333-03293 The B.F.Goodrich CompanyStock Option Plan — Form S-8 May 8, 1996     333-19697 The B.F.Goodrich Company SavingsBenefit Restoration Plan — Form S-8 January 13, 1997     333-53879 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan — Form S-8 May 29, 1998     333-53881 Rohr, Inc. 1982 Stock Option Plan,Rohr, Inc. 1989 Stock Incentive Plan andRohr, Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive Plan — Form S-8 May 29, 1998     333-76297 Coltec Industries Inc. 1992 Stock Option PlanColtec Industries Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan forOutside Directors — Form S-8 April 14, 1999     333-77023 The B.F.Goodrich Company Stock OptionPlan — Form S-8 April 26, 1999     333-60210 The B.F. Goodrich Company Stock OptionPlan – Form S-8 May 4, 2001     333-60208 The B.F. Goodrich Company EmployeeStock Purchase Plan – Form S-8 May 4, 2001     333-98165 Shelf Registration for Debt Securities, Series PreferredStock, Common Stock, Stock Purchase Contracts andStock Purchase Units – Form S-3 August 15, 2002     333-107866 Goodrich Corporation Employees’ SavingsPlan – Form S-8 August 12, 2003     333-107867 Goodrich Corporation Wage Employees’ SavingsPlan – Form S-8 August 12, 2003     333-107868 Goodrich Corporation Savings Plan for Rohr Employees – Form S-8 August 12, 2003     333-109247 Goodrich Corporation Directors’ DeferredCompensation Plan – Form S-8 September 29, 2003
November 2, 2004
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
#### Henry MASON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-396.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 15, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Victor J. ZELAZNY and June E. Zelazny, his wife, and Gerald E. Freed and Doris Freed, his wife, jointly and severally, Appellants, v. NOVA LUMBER & TRUSS CO., Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-482.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 22, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Brevard County; Joe A. Cowart, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# Official Journal L 319/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 319 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 584 December 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 319

English edition

Legislation

Volume 584 December 2015

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2015/2219 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) and replacing and repealing Council Decision 2005/681/JHA | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2015/2219 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) and replacing and repealing Council Decision 2005/681/JHA

1

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2015/812 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 amending Council Regulations (EC) No 850/98, (EC) No 2187/2005, (EC) No 1967/2006, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 254/2002, (EC) No 2347/2002 and (EC) No 1224/2009, and Regulations (EU) No 1379/2013 and (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards the landing obligation, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1434/98 ( OJ L 133, 29.5.2015 ) | 21 |
| | * | Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 236/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 laying down common rules and procedures for the implementation of the Union's instruments for financing external action ( OJ L 77, 15.3.2014 ) | 21 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2015/812 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 amending Council Regulations (EC) No 850/98, (EC) No 2187/2005, (EC) No 1967/2006, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 254/2002, (EC) No 2347/2002 and (EC) No 1224/2009, and Regulations (EU) No 1379/2013 and (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards the landing obligation, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1434/98 ( OJ L 133, 29.5.2015 )

( OJ L 133, 29.5.2015 )

21

*

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 236/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 laying down common rules and procedures for the implementation of the Union's instruments for financing external action ( OJ L 77, 15.3.2014 )

( OJ L 77, 15.3.2014 )

21

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section a 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May 16, 2011 | /s/  James R. Harlan                        |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | James R. Harlan                                       |
|                          | Chief Financial Officer (Principal financial officer) |

----
#### In the Interest of D. R. S., a child.

No. 73-405.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 26, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Juvenile Division, Orange County; William C. Grid-ley, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 108

Requiring Members of the House of Representatives to pay $600 from the

Official Expenses Allowance for each instance of extraneous matter printed in that portion of the Congressional Record entitled ‘‘Extensions

of Remarks’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 2, 1993

Mr. GOSS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Requiring Members of the House of Representatives to pay

$600 from the Official Expenses Allowance for each instance of extraneous matter printed in that portion of

the Congressional Record entitled ‘‘Extensions of

Remarks’’.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. PAYMENT REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN EXTEN3 SIONS OF REMARKS.

4 In each case of extraneous matter printed in that por5 tion of the Congressional Record entitled ‘‘Extensions of

6 Remarks’’, a Member of the House of Representatives who

7 submits the matter shall pay $600 out of the Official Ex-
2

•HRES 108 IH

1 penses Allowance of the Member. The amounts so paid

2 shall be credited to the applicable appropriation relating

3 to publication of the Congressional Record.

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF THE SPEAKER.

5 The Speaker shall have authority to specify such

6 standards and to make such determinations as may be

7 necessary to assure compliance with this resolution.

8 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

9 As used in section 1—

10 (1) the term ‘‘extraneous matter’’ means matter

11 not related to the legislative business of the day; and

12 (2) the term ‘‘Member of the House of Rep13 resentatives’’ means a Representative in, or a Dele14 gate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 12

                    BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORPORATION
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                For the Year Ended December 31
                                                                ------------------------------
                                                 1998          1997          1996          1995           1994   
                                             -----------   -----------    -----------   -----------   -----------
                                                           (dollars in thousands)
<S>                                         <C>            <C>            <C>           <C>           <C>        
Interest costs and amortization
   of debt costs                            $    26,273    $    20,308    $     7,868   $       725   $        --
Interest costs capitalized
   during the period                              1,025             --             --            --            --
Interest factor related to
   noncapitalized leases (1)                      5,207          4,456          4,839         2,203         1,632
                                            -----------    -----------    -----------   -----------   -----------

   Total fixed charges                      $    32,505    $    24,764    $    12,707   $     2,928   $     1,632
                                            ===========    ===========    ===========   ===========   ===========


Income before income taxes                       95,911    $    99,784    $    93,812   $    71,370   $    43,194
Total fixed charges                              32,505         24,764         12,707         2,928         1,632
Less:  Interest capitalized                      (1,025)            --             --            --            --
                                            -----------    -----------    -----------   -----------   -----------
Total earnings before
   fixed charges                            $   127,391    $   124,548    $   106,519   $    74,298   $    44,826
                                            ===========    ===========    ===========   ===========   ===========


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  3.9            5.0            8.4          25.4          27.5
</TABLE>




(1)   Interest expense for operating leases with terms of one year or longer is
based on an imputed interest rate for each lease.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Sierra Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Denis Atkins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 4, 2008

/s/ Dennis AtkinsDennis AtkinsChief Financial Officer

1

---
#### Nan A. PERRY, d/b/a Perry Realty, Appellant, v. Louis A. JACOBSEN and Viola Jacobsen, his wife, Appellees.

No. 69-63.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 10, 1970.

C. Bette Wimbish, of Minnis & Williams, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

*751Joseph S. Rodriguez, St. Petersburg, for appellees.

MANN, Judge.

The trial judge found that appellant broker was not entitled to a commission, there being sufficient evidence that she was not the procuring cause of the sale. Salter v. Knowles, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 138.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
#### Reba RICHTER, Appellant, v. Ben T. WADDILL, d/b/a Koin Klean Laundry, Appellee.

No. J-202.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Nov. 14, 1967.

T. Buckingham Bird, Monticello, for appellant.

Hall, Hartwell, Hall &r Canada, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Chambers v. Southern Wholesale, Inc., 92 So.2d 188 (Fla.1957); McKean v. Kloeppel Hotels, Inc., 171 So.2d 552 (Fla.App. 1st, 1965).

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal C 253/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 253 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4919 October 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 253

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4919 October 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 253/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 253/2 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises (1) | 2 |
| 2006/C 253/3 | Adoption of three reference documents for the purpose of Council Directive 96/61/EC concerning integrated pollution prevention and control | 5 |
| 2006/C 253/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4291 — Voestalpine/Profilafroid/SAP) (1) | 6 |
| 2006/C 253/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4256 — Xstrata/Falconbridge) (1) | 6 |
| 2006/C 253/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4332 — MEAS/DSPL/Sadoport) (1) | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 253/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 253/2

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises (1)

2

2006/C 253/3

Adoption of three reference documents for the purpose of Council Directive 96/61/EC concerning integrated pollution prevention and control

5

2006/C 253/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4291 — Voestalpine/Profilafroid/SAP) (1)

6

2006/C 253/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4256 — Xstrata/Falconbridge) (1)

6

2006/C 253/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4332 — MEAS/DSPL/Sadoport) (1)

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
House Calendar No. 117

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 304

[Report No. 103–343]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution

other purposes.propriations for the fiscal year 1994, and for(H.J. Res. 288) making further continuing apNOVEMBER 9, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 117

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 304

[Report No. 103–343]

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 288) making

further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1994, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 9, 1993

Mr. BEILENSON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res.

288) making further continuing appropriations for the

fiscal year 1994, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order, any rule of the House to the contrary

3 notwithstanding, to consider in the House the joint resolu4 tion (H.J. Res. 288) making further continuing appropria5 tions for the fiscal year 1994, and for other purposes. De6 bate on the joint resolution shall not exceed one hour

7 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank-
2

HRES 304 RH

1 ing minority member of the Committee on Appropriations.

2 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on

3 the joint resolution to final passage without intervening

4 motion except one motion to recommit.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joseph O. JENKINS v. Ross MAGGIO, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 60597.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1977.

In re: Joseph Jenkins applying for writ of habeas corpus and remedial writ.

Writ refused. No merit in application.