alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ASD SYSTEMS, INC. THE FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          20,157
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (37)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,667
<PP&E>                                           9,880
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,615)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,741
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,174
<SALES>                                          5,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,037
<CGS>                                            4,588
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,588
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,902
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,299)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,154)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,154)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.76)


</TABLE>
#### JOHN LOGAN vs. THE FARMERS’ BANK.

A party is not entitled to have his case continued for want of material papers, without specifying them, so as to show their materiality.

Capias case to November term, 1853.

At the May term, 1854, the case came up for trial; and,

*Mr. Rogers,*for the plaintiff,

moved a continuance, founded on an affidavit that the plaintiff had been unable to discover certain papers material to the case, and which he hoped to procure by the next term.

The continuance was opposed by Messrs. *Bradford*and *J. A. Bayard,*for the defendants,

who contended that a lawful ground for the continuance had not been laid. They insisted that the papers should be specified, in order that they might know not only their materiality, but ascertain what diligence had been used to procure them; that they might produce them if in their power, or that the affiant might be subjected to criminal liability in case he swears falsely. They said, by reference to the practice in continuing causes for inability to procure the attendance of witnesses, it was constantly required that the names of the witnesses should be disclosed; and, *438under circumstances, that the matters to be proved by the witnesses shall be disclosed.

Rogers, for plaintiff.

*J. A. Bayard*and Bradford, for defendants.

*The Court*

refused the continuance, unless the papers were specified. This was necessary, in order to test the amount of diligence used in discovering them.

The case was afterwards continued.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Ben J. Lipps, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ BEN J. LIPPS
---------------------------
Ben J. Lipps
November 14, 2002
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1066

HARRY R. BAILEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge; James K. Bredar, Magistrate Judge. (CA-98-3706-CCB) Submitted: June 30, 2000 Decided: July 19, 2000 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen F. Shea, WILLONER, CALABRESE & ROSEN, P.A., College Park,Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Nadira Clark, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Arthur J. Fried, General Counsel, Charlotte J. Hardnett,Principal Deputy General Counsel, John M. Sacchetti, Associate General Counsel, Frieda Schlemeyer Colfelt, Office of General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994). 2 PER CURIAM: Harry R. Bailey appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security. * Bailey brought this action in the district court pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g) (West Supp. 2000), seeking review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security determining that Bailey could not exclude resources for basic living expenses fromhis countable income as expenditures necessary to fulfill the occupational goals embodied in his Plan to Achieve Self Support. See 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1225-1227 (1999). Bailey also sought review of the Commissioner’s refusal to waive recovery of the overpayment which resulted from the improper exclusion. See 20 C.F.R. § 416.550 (1999). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm onthe reasoning of the magistrate judge. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
** **

**EXHIBIT 99.16**

 

**CONSENT OF MARVIN SILVA**

** **

March 20, 2012

 

Brigus Gold Corp.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

 

**Re: Brigus Gold Corp.**

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

I hereby consent to (i) the use of my name in connection withthe following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F forthe year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 40-F”) of Brigus Gold Corp. (the “Company”) to which this consentrelates: (A) the technical report entitled “Black Fox Project National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report” dated January6, 2011 (the “Report”), (B) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2011 and (C)the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2011, (ii) the inclusion or incorporationby reference of information derived from the Report in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-113889, 333-162558and 333-167757), as amended, as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of theforegoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned includedor incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplementsthereto.

 

Sincerely,
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 15, 2017

No. 04-17-00432-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.G.G. ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PA00058

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

State’s motion for extension of time to file brief is GRANTED. We order the brief due 

January 2, 2018.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of December, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
[No. 1032-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

May 30, 1972.]

#### Jerome R. Wicklund *et al., Respondents,*v. Petrolane Northwest Supply Co., *Appellant.*
Opinion issued January 23, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00021-CR

———————————

IN RE JOSHUA TYRONE LANE, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Joshua Tyrone Lane, has filed a pro se “Original Application for Writ 

of Mandamus.” Relator seeks to compel the respondent district judge to conduct a 

hearing regarding whether relator’s application for a writ of habeas corpus meets the 
2

exceptions for subsequent writs for felony convictions, pursuant to Section 4 of 

Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

1

In 2009, this Court affirmed relator’s felony convictions for murder and two 

counts of aggravated robbery. See Lane v. State, Nos. 01-08-00460-CR, 01-09-

00645-CR, 01-09-00646-CR, 2009 WL 3400956 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 

Oct. 22, 2009, pet. ref’d) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication). 

Thus, because this petition involves final felony convictions, we lack jurisdiction 

because the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction over Article 

11.07 post-conviction habeas applications arising from final felony convictions. See 

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a) (West 2017); Padieu v. Court of 

Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (orig. 

proceeding) (per curiam).

Accordingly, we construe the application as a petition for a writ of mandamus

and dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Lloyd.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

 

1 The petition indicates that the underlying case is The State of Texas v. Joshua Tyrone 

Lane, No. 54972, 300th District Court, Brazoria County, Texas, the Honorable K. 

Randall Hufstetler presiding.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LADARIUS ADAM LEWIS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4688

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed October 11, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Samantha L. Ward, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Frederick W. Vollrath, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant..

Carolyn Snurkowski, Associate Deputy 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia 

Richards, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, SALARIO, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
#### BASIN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION et al., Defendants-Appellees, Independent Refiners Association of America, Applicant for Intervention in the District Court, Appellant.

No. 5-22.

Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals.

March 7, 1977.

Before INGRAHAM, VAN OOSTER-HOUT and JOHNSON, Judges.

ORDER

For the reasons stated in this Court’s opinion entered in *Basin, Inc.*v. *Federal Energy Administration et al.,*Em.App.1977, 552 F.2d 931, it is ORDERED that the issues presented in this case be and are hereby declared MOOT.
#### CLARK *v.*WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 52,

September Term, 1962.]

*Decided January 30, 1963.*

Before the full Court.

PER Curiam.

For the reasons given in the lower court’s opinion, as well as upon the authority of *Ellinger v. Warden,*224 Md. 648, this application for leave to appeal from denial of post conviction relief is hereby denied.
#### Steven Kulovits Trucking and State Workmen’s Insurance Fund, Insurance Carrier, Appellants, *v.*Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board and Larry C. Miller, Appellees.

*418Argued January 9, 1975,

before Judges Kramer, Wilkinson, Jr. and Mencer, sitting as a panel of three.

*Frank J. Toole, Sr.,*Special Assistant Attorney General, with him *John E. O’Connor,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellants.

*Joseph F. Leeson,*with him *James N. Diefenderfer,*for appellees.

February 18, 1975:

Opinion by

Judge Kramer,

This is an appeal by Steven Kulovits Trucking and State Workmen’s Insurance Fund (hereinafter collectively referred to as Kulovits) from an adjudication by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which awarded compensation to Larry C. Miller (Miller).

Miller was injured in an automobile accident on October 5, 1972, and he filed a claim for workmen’s compensation on October 19, 1972. The primary legal issue involved in Miller’s claim is the question of whether he was in the course of his employment when he was injured. The referee decided Miller was not in the *419course of his employment when he sustained his injuries and, therefore, denied compensation. On appeal the Board concluded that the referee had erred in concluding that Miller was not in the course of his employment when he was injured and, therefore, the Board reversed the referee and awarded compensation for total disability. Kulovits now appeals to this Court, arguing that Miller was not in the course of his employment when he was injured and that the Board erred when it reversed the referee’s decision.

We are precluded from considering the merits of Kulovits’ appeal because it was not timely filed. Section 427 of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, *as*amended, 77 P.S. §873 (Supp. 1974-1975), requires that appeals to this Court be taken within 20 days after notice of the Board’s action has been served. Section 406 of the Act, 77 P.S. §717 (Supp. 1974-1975), provides in pertinent part: “any notice or copy shall be deemed served on the date when mailed. ...” The Board’s decision in this case was mailed on May 16, 1974, and Kulovits’ appeal was not filed in this Court until June 6, 1974. In computing statutory time periods, we are required to exclude the first day and include the last day. *See*Section 1908 of the Statutory Construction Act of 1972, 1 Pa. C.S. §1908. Kulovits’ appeal was filed one day late, and, therefore, this Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. *See Findlay Refractories Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board,*13 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 279, 320 A. 2d 399 (1974); *General v. E. Roseman Co.,*10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 569, 312 A. 2d 609 (1973). In accordance with the above, we therefore

Order

And Now, this 18th day of February, 1975, the appeal of Steven Kulovits Trucking and State Workmen’s Insurance Fund is hereby dismissed.
[No. 835-1.

Division One—Panel 1.

April 10, 1972.]

#### Dale A. Crowe, *Appellant,*v. Rothenbuhler Engineering *et al., Respondents.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 24, 2009 

s0217 

Order 

 

February 24, 2009 

137743 

TONI LANETT JAMISON, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137743 

 COA: 285061 

Muskegon CC: 76-001227-DP 

ANTHONY CRAIG WILLIAMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 8, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Judy McLain TWILLEY v. Hill McLAIN, Jr.

No. 45706.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 30, 1970.

Louie Bishop, Waynesboro, Roland C. Lewis, Don H. Evans, Jackson, for appellant.

W. Vol Jones, William Vol Jones, Jr., Waynesboro, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 117

Limiting the Official Mail Allowance for Members of the House for the

second session of this Congress to 80 percent of that allowance for

the first session, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1993

Mr. WISE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

RESOLUTION

Limiting the Official Mail Allowance for Members of the

House for the second session of this Congress to 80

percent of that allowance for the first session, and for

other purposes.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON OFFICIAL MAIL ALLOWANCE.

3 The Official Mail Allowance for each Member of the

4 House for the second session of this Congress may not

5 exceed 80 percent of that allowance for the first session

6 of this Congress.
2

•HRES 117 IH

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF THE DEFICIT.

2 Any moneys saved as a result of section 1 and any

3 amount that is made available for the Official Mail Allow4 ance for a session of this Congress and is not used for

5 that session for that purpose shall be returned to the

6 Treasury for the purpose of deficit reduction.

7 SEC. 3. REGULATIONS.

8 The Committee on House Administration shall have

9 authority to prescribe regulations to carry out this resolu10 tion.

11 SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

12 As used in this resolution, the term ‘‘Member’’ means

13 a Representative in, or a Delegate or Resident Commis14 sioner to, the Congress.

Æ
[No. 396-3.

Division Three.

February 17, 1972.]

#### Gerald R. Moro, *Appellant,*v. A. R. Kinkade *et al., Respondents.*
EXHIBIT 15

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of
Directors and Shareholders

Frischs Restaurants, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying interim consolidated balance sheet of Frischs Restaurants, Inc. (an Ohio Corporation) and subsidiaries as of September 22, 2009, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the sixteen week periods ended September 22, 2009 and September 23, 2008. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A
review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to
be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of June 2, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders equity and cash flows for the year
then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated July 24, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
|Cincinnati, Ohio      
|October 26, 2009
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18



                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                               BORDER GROUP, INC.
                              ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN



         The Border Group, Inc. Annual Incentive Bonus Plan (the "Plan") is 
hereby amended as follows:

         1.   The following sentence is hereby added to the end of Section 6(a) 
              of the Plan:

              "Notwithstanding  any other  provision of the Plan,  the actual 
              Bonus paid to any Participant for any Plan year shall not exceed 
              $900,000."

         Except as herein amended, the Plan shall remain in full force and
effort.


                                             BORDERS GROUP, INC.



                                             By: /s/ George R. Mrkonic
                                                ---------------------------
                                                George R. Mrkonic
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 2 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 2

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 5, 1993.
    Resolved, That the Senate be informed that a quorum of the House of 
Representatives has assembled; that Thomas S. Foley, a Representative from the 
State of Washington, has been elected Speaker; and Donnald K. Anderson, a 
citizen of the State of California, has been elected Clerk of the House of 
Representatives of the One Hundred Third Congress.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```