alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 931

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to require the Secretary of

the Treasury to issue to the trust funds under the old-age, survivors,

and disability insurance program certificates evidencing obligations of

the United States held by such trust funds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 17, 1993

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to require

the Secretary of the Treasury to issue to the trust funds

under the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program certificates evidencing obligations of the United

States held by such trust funds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Invest5 ment Certification Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 931 IH

1 SEC. 2. CERTIFICATION OF OBLIGATIONS ISSUED TO THE

2 TRUST FUNDS.

3 Section 201(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

4 401(d)) is amended by inserting after the fifth sentence

5 the following new sentence: ‘‘Each obligation issued for

6 purchase by the Trust Funds under this subsection shall

7 be accompanied by a certificate of the Secretary of the

8 Treasury evidencing the principal amount, date of matu9 rity, and interest rate of such obligation, and stating on

10 its face that such obligation shall be incontestable in the

11 hands of the Trust Fund to which it is issued, that such

12 obligation is supported by the full faith and credit of the

13 United States, and that the United States is pledged to

14 the payment of the obligation with respect to both prin15 cipal and interest.’’.

16 SEC. 3. TREATMENT OF OUTSTANDING OBLIGATIONS.

17 Not later than 60 days after the date of the enact18 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall issue

19 to the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust

20 Fund or the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund, as

21 applicable, a certificate for each obligation which has been

22 issued to the Trust Fund under section 201(d) of the So23 cial Security Act and which is outstanding as of such date.

24 Each such certificate shall evidence the principal amount,

25 date of maturity, and interest rate of such obligation, and

26 shall state on its face that such obligation shall be incon-
3

•HR 931 IH

1 testable in the hands of the Trust Fund to which it was

2 issued, that such obligation is supported by the full faith

3 and credit of the United States, and that the United

4 States is pledged to the payment of the obligation with

5 respect to both principal and interest.

Æ
#### BENJAMIN P. TOWNSEND *vs.*JOHN S. TOWNSEND.

What items are properly chargeable in a book account.

Assumpsit for goods sold, &c., money lent, &c., with the common counts. Pleas, non assumpsit-.

*Mr. Platt*put in the plaintiff’s book of original entries, with his oath, &c.

*126*Mr. Rodney*objected to the following items of charge in the plaintiff’s books:—

1. To a bay horse sold him $45. 2. Hire of wagon; *tallage and tavern expenses. ‘*3. Lot of wheat on the ground $14. 4. Corn delivered by J. T. Townsend $28. 5. Oats delivered by Samuel Stanton; sold for 35 cents, charged 70. 6. A stove omitted (interlined) $10. 7. One grubbing hoe of J. Stevens $1 50. 8. Balance on settlement $1 45. 9. Sharpening a hoe of Stevens 121⁄2 cents.

*Platt, for*plaintiff.

*Rodney,*for defendant.

*By the*Court:

The plaintiff’s book of accounts is not evidence of cash lent or of cash paid. It is not sufficient evidence in itself of a balance due on a settlement between the parties; the entry of *“a*bay horse $45,” needs confirmation by other evidence of the sale and price; a horse is not an article of ordinary merchandise; “ tallage and tavern expenses” must be a charge for cash paid for tallage and tavern expenses; arid is not proper. The *“*lot of wheat on the ground” also needs confirmation.
[No. 151-3.

Division Three.

March 30, 1972.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. James Richard Floyd Kennedy, *Appellant.*
#### M. D. FUTCH and Kay Best, Appellants, v. Phillip R. CONSOLO and Celia A. Consolo, his wife, Appellees.

No. 69-24.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 4, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 26, 1969.

Robert C. Lane, Miami, for appellants.

Sibley, Giblin, Levenson & Ward, Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants were plaintiffs below, who brought this action to recover a commission, allegedly owed them by the appellees, due to the sale of real property. At trial, the court entered a directed verdict in favor of the appellees, finding that there was no issue of fact for the jury to determine and that as a matter of law, appel-lees were entitled to final judgment in their favor. We affirm the entry of directed verdict. The record on appeal shows that the broker here voluntarily abandoned his efforts to find a purchaser for the property within a reasonable time, and further, that the appellees did not interfere with the broker’s efforts.

Therefore, the final judgment being appealed is hereby affirmed. See Shuler v. Allen, Fla.1955, *76*So.2d 879.
F OR P UBLICATION



### UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT

M I C H A E L N O Z Z I , an individual; N I D I A P E L

A E Z , an individual; L O S A N G E L E S C O A L I T I O N T O E N D H U N G E R A N D H O M E L E S S N E S S , a non-profit org aniz ation, on behalf of themselves and similarly

situated persons, Plaintiffs-Appellants
,

v

.

H O U S I N G A U T H O R

I T Y O F T H E C I T Y O F L O S A

N G E L E S ; R

U D O L P H M O N T I E L , in his official capacity
,

Defendants-Appellees

. N o. 13-56223

D.C. No. 2:07-cv-00380- GW -F F M

ORDER

F iled J anuary

29, 2016

B efore: Stephen Reinhardt and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit J udg es and Miranda M. Du, * District J udg e.

* T h e Ho n o rab l e M i r an d a M. D u , District J u d g e f o r th e U.S. District Co u rt f o r th e District o f

Nev ad a, sittin g b y

d esig n atio n

.N O Z Z I V

. HACL A

2

ORDER

The opinion file d November 30, 2015, and appearing at 806 F .3d 1178 (9th Cir. 2 0 15), is hereby a mended as follows:

1. Slip o p. a t 47, line 2: after “to ‘preserve the appearance o f justice’” but before the end of the sentence and the citation Id.
, i n s e r t : “ and avoid any sug g estion that the district judg e orig inally assig ned to the case desig nated the judg e to whom the case is reassig

ned.”

2. Sli p o p

. at 47, line 2: after the Id. citation that n ow follows the above amendment, insert the following footnote: “B y this order, w e i m p l y no concern that the two judg e s would b e less than fully objective a n d fair were the case reassig ned to them. W e are also aware tha t a n y a s sig nment would b e m a d e in a random manner under the reg ular procedures of the district court and w o u l d in n o way be influenced by

J udg e W u’s sug g estion. I t is solely the public perception of unfairness that concerns us.”

W ith these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the p etition for rehearing en banc. T he full court has been adv i s e d of the petition for rehearing en banc
, and no judg e has r equested a vote on whether to rehear the matter e n b a n c. F ed. R. App. P. 35. The petitions for re h e a ri n g and rehearing en b anc a re DENIED

. No further petitions f or r ehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained.

The petition for leave to file a late, oversiz ed b r i e f o f amicus curiae on behalf of the Housing and Development L aw I nstitute is also DENIED

.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 1, 2018

NO. 03

- 17

- 00280

- CR

Judy Stailey, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 7 OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, J USTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED

— OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the rec ord and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the

court below.
NUMBERS 13-10-00209-CV AND 13-10-210-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF V.L., K.L., AND J.L., CHILDREN

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 319th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yanez, Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jacob D. Lopez, perfected appeals from judgments rendered against 

him in favor of appellee, Yvonne Garza Lopez. On April 12, 2010, in separate letters, the 

Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above causes were

originally due on March 19, 2010, and that the deputy district clerk, Arnold Garcia, had 

notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's 

record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be 

taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). 
2

Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date 

of receipt of this notice, the appeals would be dismissed for want of prosecution. 

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notices. Accordingly, the appeals

are DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

20th day of May, 2010.
[No. 200-3.

Division Three.

December 17, 1971.]

#### Clinton G. Austin, *Appellant,*v. The Department of Labor and Industries, *Respondent.*
Exhibit
10.8


 


FoxWayne
Enterprises Acquisition Corp.


1
Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 1039


New
York, New York 10020


___________,
2021


 


FoxWayne
Enterprises Acquisition Sponsor LLC


1
Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 1039


New
York, New York 10020


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


This
letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the
registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of FoxWayne Enterprises Acquisition Corp.’s (the “Company”) securities and continuing until the
earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in
each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination
Date”), FoxWayne Enterprises Acquisition Sponsor LLC shall make available to the Company certain office space, utilities
and secretarial support as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 1 Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 1039, New
York, New York 10020 (or any successor location). In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay FoxWayne Enterprises Acquisition
Sponsor LLC the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. FoxWayne
Enterprises Acquisition Sponsor LLC hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or
to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) to be established upon
the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a
result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the
Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


[Signature
Page Follows]


 




    	 



     


    

 


	 	Very
    truly yours,
	 	 
	 	FOXWAYNE
    ENTERPRISES ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:
    	 
	 	Name:	Robb
    Knie
	 	Title:	Chief
    Executive Officer


 


	AGREED
    TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 
	FOXWAYNE
    ENTERPRISES ACQUISITION SPONSOR, LLC	 
	 	 	 
	By:	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	Title:
No. 17.

#### Stanley P. Hall et al., Administrators *v.*F. Alexander Chandler et al., Receivers.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appéals for the First Circuit.

Argued October 8, 1925.

Decided October 12, 1925.

*Mr. Stanley P. Hall,*with whom *Messrs. Walter B. Grant*and *Arthur V. Harper*were on the brief, for appellants.

*Mr. Judd Dewey*for appellees.

*Per Curiam.*

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon authority of *Begg*v. *New York City,*262 U. S. 196, 198; *Shultes*v. *McDougal,*225 U. S. 561, 568.
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SkillSoft Public Limited Company (the“Company”) for the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Thomas J. McDonald, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: April 13, 2007              /s/ Thomas J. McDonald   Thomas J. McDonald   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-173182, 333-66444, 333-45070 and 333-44590) of
our report dated March 30, 2017 relating to the combined financial statements for the Penguin Random House Venture, which appears in this Form 20-F.

PricewaterhouseCoopers GmbH

Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

April 3, 2017



|                                                              |  |                                                               
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Werner Ballhaus
Wirtschaftsprüfer
(German Public Auditor) |  | /s/ Christian Landau
Wirtschaftsprüfer (German Public Auditor)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from internally
prepared for six months ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such Form 10-Q for period ended March 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          61,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,108,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   376,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,890,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,652,000
<PP&E>                                       2,333,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 170,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,992,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,493,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       933,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,992,000
<SALES>                                      5,391,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,714,000
<CGS>                                        4,259,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,123,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,881,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               211,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             248,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,749,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    50,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,799,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,799,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.30)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           26978
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    50263
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2310
<INVENTORY>                                      27118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                111422
<PP&E>                                          138442
<DEPRECIATION>                                   83590
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  178441
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            30161
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            84
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      136479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    178441
<SALES>                                          69530
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 69530
<CGS>                                            42327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    42327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   220
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  44
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9172
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3669
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5503
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5503
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2003 of Golf Host Resorts, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the
Report) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Merrick Kleeman, President of the
Company, certify, that:



| | 1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and                 
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the company.

| |  |                     |  |                          
| |  | ------------------- |  | -------------------------
| |  | /s/ Merrick Kleeman
| |  |                    
| |  | Name:               |  | Merrick Kleeman          
| |  | Title:              |  | President                
| |  |                     |  | (Chief Executive Officer)
| |  | Date:               |  | August 14, 2003
#### On the Petition of JAMES KIMMEY and others.

Notice of application for a public road, served on an overseer on the premises, held good as to an owner residing out of the county.

Kent Sessions,

April term, 1848.

In the matter of the petition of James Kimmey and others, for a public road in Dover hundred.

The petitioner proved the service of written notice of the intended application on the owners of the land, over which the contemplated road was to run, but as to one of them, who resided out of the county, the notice was left with an overseer, who resided on the farm and carried it on for the owner.

*Mr. Bates*objected that this was not sufficient notice to the owner; that the overseer was not a tenant, nor in any way obliged to communicate such notice to his employers; and that where the owner resides within the State, the purposes of the act of 1847 required notice to such owner directly.

*Comegys,*for petitioners.

*Bates,*contra.

*The Court*

thought the notice sufficient. The law requires the notice to be given to the owner or “holder” of the land. ■ We do not consider that this was intended to restrict it to the tenant, or person holding under a lease, but reasonably extends to any person occupying, or in possession, placed there by the owners; and who may be expected to take care of his interests on this, as on other matters connected with the land.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         747,910
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,909,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                   335,863
<INVENTORY>                                    203,463
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,548,064
<PP&E>                                       1,183,213
<DEPRECIATION>                                 779,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,893,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,153,022
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        9,620,812
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,369,883
<OTHER-SE>                                     537,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,893,086
<SALES>                                     23,586,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,214,426
<CGS>                                       21,352,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,525,218
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,638,026
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             888,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,814,878)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,814,878)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (1,443,949)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,437,577)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)


</TABLE>