alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


       
<S>                                 <C>
<ARTICLE>                                   UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from FPL's condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30,
1997 and condensed consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

<CIK>                               0000037634
<NAME>           Florida Power & Light Company
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            9-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                          PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>           $8,827,671
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>           $951,064
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              $1,312,882
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    $0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                        $446,218
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     $11,537,835
<COMMON>                                    $0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   $0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         $0
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      $4,734,927
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       $0
<PREFERRED>                           $226,250
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                $2,514,382
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                          $0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                   $0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>              $0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>               $0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                   $0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                 $0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                            $0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>      $4,062,276
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      $11,537,835
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>           $4,759,380
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                  $299,162
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          $3,761,362
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          $4,060,524
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>               $698,856
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                      $4,298
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>        $703,154
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>              $173,087
<NET-INCOME>                          $530,067
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            $15,069
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>         $514,998
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    $0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                   $0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              $1,367,945
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               $0
<EPS-DILUTED>                               $0

        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Motors Corporation (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, G. Richard Wagoner, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.


                                     By:  /s/G. RICHARD WAGONER, JR.
                                     ---  --------------------------
                                          G. Richard Wagoner, Jr.
                                          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                          November 9, 2005



































                                       46
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 174

Impeaching Robert F. Collins, judge of the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana, for bribery and high crimes and

misdemeanors.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1993

Mr. CANADY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Impeaching Robert F. Collins, judge of the United States

District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana,

for bribery and high crimes and misdemeanors.

1 Resolved, That Robert F. Collins, judge of the United

2 States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisi3 ana, is impeached for bribery and high crimes and mis4 demeanors.

Æ
#### Gary Walter VAUGHN and Carol Janet YEOMANS, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-680.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 14, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
i OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

\ AUSTI 

Yl 

-2 GROVER SELLERS 

AsronNEv GENERAL 

Honorable J. B. Hutchinson 

County Auditor 

Bovle county 

Boston, Texoa 

Gear Sir: Cpinion No. o-6679 ? 

RCJ: Authority of the Cow& Auditor 

of Bovle County to make ~ertaln 

deductions SW s"lax+y 

checks of Co OSf%%ers\under 

the facts state ~lov. \ 

Your letter of a recent dat 

from this Department Is, in part, 

"The Commissioners Cour 

all County Offlcles 

hour days per-%&@. 

flco’ nbg Is he precluded from recovering by the 

sactabs t,he,has,been ~' wrongfully deprived of the 

right to @&rSorm the services or that another person has“per@mned them. Thus em officer vho has 

been vrorigzully removed from office may recover 

the salary or emoluments of the office; and an 

officer de jure stay rMover the amount from 8 te 

facto officer to vhom the money has been prld. 
38’7 

Xonorable J. B. IIutchmon, pwe 2 

This Department has repeatedly held that the Commissioners' Court Is a court of limited jurlsdlotlon and has only 

such powers 8s are conferred upon It by the statutes and Constitution OS this State either by express terns or by necessary 

izp11cat1on. Seotlon 18 of Artlole V of the Texas Constitution, 

Article 2351, Vernon's Annotated Cltil Statutes; Ven Rosenberg 

v. Lovett, 173 5. bl. 508; IIIllle;p v. Broun, 216 3. W. (26) 479’ 

Oalveston, H. i% 8. A. Ry. Co. v. Welds County, 167 9. W. (2dj 

10848 11 Tuee Jurlsprudenae ft64. 

Although Seotlon 10 of Artlole XVI of our State Constitution provides that "The Legislature shall provide for 

deductions Srum the salaries of public offloere who pray neglect 

the performance oS any duty that mpy be asalgned them by lav," 

XQ knov of no provlalon in the Conetltutlota or statutea of this 

state requiring county oSPlces to be open to the pub110 for any 

rrpeciflc time other than for a reasoneble time. Rer do vo knov 

of any provlslcm ln the Constitution or stututes of this State 

authorizing the Commissioners1 Court to pess an order 

offloes so be open to the public six &hour &rys 

Urlng 

count 

hours f 

"c or 48 

per veek. 

The Count7 Auditor has only such povers and duties as 

are conSewed upmr him by the Lirwls of this State and vo know of 

no provision vhlch gives the County Auditor the parer or duty 

to deduct from the salery check (au lmldent to the office) of a 

county offlaor any unount for the reason that HI& officer falled to keep bia offloe open to the public SIX &-hour days (or 48 

hours) per tteek. 

In view of the foregolog it 14 the Opinion of this 

mpertmemt that your question should be anevered fn the negatlve, and It Ie ao ansvered. 

Youre very truly, 

.,.A ATTORRBY OEWRAL OF mcA3 

BY 

. C. mvln, Jr. 

‘ids, ” J. ~Amalstant 

BY 

JR/JCP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000938322
<NAME> CIGF-II

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,552,352
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               276,197
<PP&E>                                       4,780,075
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,093,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,614,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          182,734
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,431,920
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,614,654
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,194,114
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,194,844
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (730)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (730)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (730)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Ethel LEVY, Appellant, v. ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 42363.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 14, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
# Fo urth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

September 17, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00435

- CV

Jerold GIVENS and Dinah Givens, Individually and as Representatives of the Estate of James Douglas Givens, Deceased, Beverly Brown, Johnny Scott Brown, Andrew Brown, Individu ally and as Representatives of the Estate of Johnnie Lee Brown, Shannon Brown, Wesley Brown

, Appellants

v.

SALATIEL POLANCO d/b/a D&C Trucking, Highway Barricades and Services, LLC, Anderson Columbia Co., Inc., Flasher Equipment Co., and D.I.J Constructi on, Inc., Appellees

From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 03

- 31056

- MCV Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On August 27, 2019, we ordered the clerk’s record to be filed no later than September 16, 2019. On September 13, 2019, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stat ing the record had not been filed due to computer issues and requesting an ext ension to September 18,
2019. On September 16, 2019, the trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record. As a result, the
Noti fication of Late Record is DENIED AS MOOT

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of September, 2019

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

, Clerk of Court
The Honorable George F. Gunn, Jr., late a United States District Judge for the 1

Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Thomas C. Mummert III, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2098

___________

Yvette Mosley, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri

Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of *

Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: October 7, 1998

 Filed: October 23, 1998

___________

Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD

ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Yvette Mosley appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court for 1

the Eastern District of Missouri, which affirmed the Commissioner’s decision to deny
-2-

Mosley disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Having

carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions, we affirm the judgment of

the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1/4/13 page of



### POST FOCUSEXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0076 Reviewer: Tobias/SS

Results Table: Dose, Concentration, and Days Exceeded Results Summary

Exposure Scenario 1 Water Landfill Stack Air Fugitive Air Drinking Water Fish Ingestion
ADR LADD ADR LADD 7Q10 4
CC = 2 PDM Days Exceede d LADD ADR LADD ADR LADD

Release activity(ies) 2 ; exposure calculation(s) 3 mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day μg/l # Days mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day

max acute eco --- --- --- --- 6.23E+00 --- --- --- --- --- ---

1 Exposure scenario titles consist of release activity followed by exposure calculation abbreviation. 2 Release activities are from engineering report's Manuf acturing (Mfg), Processing (Proc) and Use release activity labels. Multiple release activities are combined in one exposure scenario if their releases occur at same location. 3 Exposure calculations are Acute Dose Rate (A DR), Lifetime Average Daily Dose (LADD), and Probabilistic Dilution Model (PDM). There may be one, two, or all three exposure calculations per exposure scenario. CC is the aquatic concentration of concern. 4 This column displays concentration values for the 7Q 10 streamflow, which is defined as the average daily streamflow of the seven consecutive days of lowest flow within a ten year period.



### Fate test recommendations?: (default is NA)1/4/13 page of

POST FOCUSEXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0076 Assessor: Tobias/SS

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#:1 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Max ADR
Release Description: WATER LANDFILL Non-sludge/Sludge STACK FUGITIVE

Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge Release Days/yr:

Per Site Release: (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day)

Remarks:1/4/13 page of

POST FOCUSEXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0076

SIC-CODE BASED HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 1 Number of Sites: RELEASE ACTIVITY: Max ADR

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: POTW's (All facilities) SIC-CODE (S): 4952 EX POSED POPULATION: Adult

WWT REMOVAL (%) RELEASE DAYS PRETREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day) POSTTREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day) DWT (%) BCF (L/kg)

0.00 0.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER

PLANT TYPE % ILE FACILITY STREAM FLOW (MLD) STREAM CONC. ( μ g/l)

Harmonic

Mean 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10 Harmonic Mean 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10

ALL 50 125.56 44.02 26.80 22.53 5.26E-02 0.15 0.25 0.29

ALL 10 11.11 1.94 1.06 0.96 0.59 3.40 6.23 6.87

DRINKING WATER AND FISH IN GESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES

Exposure Units Drinking Water Results Drinking Water Units Fish Ingestion Results Fish Ingestion

Units 50% 10% 50% 10%

Cancer

LADD pot 1.12E-09 1.27E-08 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day

LADC pot 5.76E-08 6.51E-07 mg/L 0.00 0.00 mg/kg

Acute

ADR pot 1.25E-05 2.84E-04 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day

SIC Code Comments:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 30055 Summary Calendar

ROBERT NELSON HOWELL , P etitioner

- Appellant

v. T.G. WERLICH, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Poll o ck , Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:15

- CV

- 2146

Before WIENER, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Robert Nelson Howell, federal prisoner # 09232

- 026, appeals the dismissal o f his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction . In the petition, he challenged his conviction and sentence imposed by the United States District Court for th e Southern District of Illinois for controlled subst ance offenses, as well as his conviction for a controlled substance offense in the District of Minnesota.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 27, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-30055 Document: 00513736606 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/27/2016No. 16

- 30055

2 Section 2241 is the procedural vehicle for challenging the manner in which a sentence is being ex ecuted, whereas a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is the vehicle for collaterally attacking a federal conviction and sentence. Padilla v. United States , 416 F.3d 424, 426 (5th Cir. 2005) . Because Howell’s challenge is to the constitutionality of his Illinois and Minnesota convictions, his claims fall under the purview of § 2255 rather than § 2241. See Padilla , 416 F.3d at 426

. A § 2255 motion must be filed in the sentencing court

. § 2255(a) ; Solsona v. Warden, F.C.I. , 821 F.2d 1129, 1132 (5th Cir. 1987)

. Alth ough Howell could seek relief in a § 2241 petition filed in the Western District of Louisiana under § 2255’s “savings clause” if he demonstrated that no adequate or effective relief was available under § 2255 and relief is available under § 2241 , see Reyes

- Reque na v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 903

- 04 (5th Cir. 2001 ), his arguments that his Minnesota conviction was obtained in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and that his Illinois conviction violated the Double Jeopardy Clause do not make the required showing. See Christopher v. Miles , 342 F.3d 378, 382 (5th Cir. 2003)

. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Howell’s motion to dismiss the superseding indictment is DENIED. Case: 16-30055 Document: 00513736606 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/27/2016
#### Jose Julian TAPIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1094.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.2



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
HomeSeekers.com, Incorporated


We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  previously  filed
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-92119,  333-32586, 333-38560,
333-48990,  333-51640)  of  HomeSeekers.com,  Incorporated  and in  the  related
previously filed Prospectus and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No.
333-44786)  pertaining  to the Amended and  Restated  1996 Stock  Option Plan of
HomeSeekers.com,  Incorporated of our report dated March 20, 2002,  appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of  HomeSeekers.com,  Incorporated  for the year
ended December 31, 2002.





CORBIN & WERTZ


Irvine, California
May 22, 2003



<PAGE>
<PAGE>
 
                                  Exhibit 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                                OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                 Jurisdiction of Incorporation
          Subsidiary                                    or Organization
----------------------------------               -----------------------------


1.  P-Com United Kingdom, Inc.                              Delaware

2.  P-Com (BARBADOS) FSC Limited                            Barbados

3.  P-Com Finance Corporation                               Delaware

4.  Geritel S.p.A.                                            Italy

5.  P-Com Network Services, Inc.                            Delaware

6.  P-Com GmbH                                               Germany

7.  Technosystem S.p.A.                                       Italy

8.  Control Resources Corporation                           Delaware

9.  Telematics, Inc.                                        Virginia

10. P-Com Services (UK) Limited                              England

11. RT Masts Limited                                         England

12. Telesys (UK) Limited                                     England
#### Neal D. EVANS, Jr., Martha Ann Evans, his wife, et al., Appellants, v. ST. REGIS PAPER COMPANY, a corporation, et al., Appellees.

Nos. Q-383, R-68.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 1, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 25, 1973.

Neal D. Evans, Jr., and George A. Stelo-geannis, of Evans, Stewart, Perry & Stelo-geannis, for appellants.

Franklin Reinstine, of Reinstine, Rein-stine & Panken, Chester Bedell and Robert P. Smith, Jr., of Bedell, Bedell, Dittmar, Smith & Zehmer, John W. Ball and John D. Corse, of Ulmer, Murchison, Ashby & Ball, A. Graham Allen, of Bryant, Freeman, Richardson & Watson, Jacksonville, Arthur N. Cohen of Goldstein, Franklin, Chonin & Schrank, North Miami Beach, *320James T. Norton, Green Cove Springs, E. L. Eastmoore, Palatka, Alban E. Brooke, of MacLean & Brooke, Davisson F. Dunlap, of Sears, Dunlap & Sears, Delbridge L. Gibbs, of Marks, Gray, Conroy & Gibbs, William L. Durden, of Kent, Durden & Kent, David C. Goodman, John F. Corri-gan, of Jennings, Watts, Clarke & Hamilton, Raymond Ehrlich and John C. Taylor, Jr., of Mathews, Osborne & Ehrlich, Thomas M. Baumer, of Mahoney, Hadlow, Chambers & Adams, Noah H. Jenerette, Jr., of Boyd, Jenerette, Leemis & Staas, T. Malcolm Kirby, of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto, Dean & Hallowes, Earle C. Moss, Jr., and James L. Ade, of Milam, Martin & Ade, Jacksonville, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Harrell v. Hess Oil and Chemical Corporation, 272 So.2d 542 (Fla.App.1973).

SPECTOR, C. J., JOHNSON, J., and MELTON, HOWELL W., Associate Judge, concur.
P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

### 3FF8CIAL B 

### ITATE ©F Tl PRIVATE USI



### RE: WR-53,367-03 aesPQsfc,

02 1M 0004279596 JAN 1 4 201J MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 78 701



### PRESIDING JUDGE 266TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT P. O. BOX V°7 

### STEPHENVIj . h... ERATH

224 KME-NaEB/ZJai^BlSS 

### "*? •TS.0(.:i-miS' • !• 2 '^'01 i "5 '.C2Z1<&'"k /'"L:8/ "li5 .RE^TiNW -TO* S£ ND£ff - " -". ••.; •'' ' CO DISTRICT 3UDGE SOX CLOSED 11 k> a » > !-- •»- Vs r- *N r*. %.» *£}»"* PC 55MOSR BC: 7S711230S8S * 2682-©7968-17 -27 r-inii'iii-n ! \ ' iHirt ru\ t t ....l.U.,,. •u ••vi Tin r'rii
#### Patricia Shank DOLAN, as Administratrix C.T.A. of the Estate of Thomas D. Shank, Deceased, Appellant, v. Berniece E. SHANK, Appellee.

No. 70-940.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 24, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Louis Weissing, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
H. Res. 130

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

March 17, 1993.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 1335) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and

for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration of the bill

for failure to comply with clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI or clause

7 of rule XXI are waived. General debate shall be confined

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the

Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion. No further
2

HRES 130 EH

consideration of the bill shall be in order except pursuant to

a subsequent order of the House.

Attest:

Clerk.