alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2018-N-0793]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on March 14, 2018. The notice announced the voluntary withdrawal of approval of four abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) from two applicants, effective April 13, 2018. In particular, the notice indicated that FDA was withdrawing approval of the following ANDA after receiving a withdrawal request from Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., c/o Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. (Sun Pharmaceutical), 2 Independence Way, Princeton, NJ 08540: ANDA 076045, Lorazepam Tablets USP, 0.5 milligram (mg), 1 mg, and 2 mg. Before withdrawal of this ANDA became effective, however, Sun Pharmaceutical informed FDA that it did not want approval of the ANDA withdrawn. Because Sun Pharmaceutical timely requested that approval of this ANDA not be withdrawn, the approval of ANDA 076045 is still in effect.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Trang Tran, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire                               ( print page 30754)                            Ave., Bldg. 75, Rm. 1671, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-402-7945.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of Wednesday, March 14, 2018 (83 FR 11208), appearing on page 11208 in FR Doc. 2018-05120, the following correction is made:                

1. On page 11208, the entry for ANDA 076045 in the table is removed.

Dated: June 26, 2018.

Leslie Kux,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-14050 Filed 6-28-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. The HOSPITAL DISTRICT OF HARDEE COUNTY, Appellee.

No. 36110.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 14, 1967.

*70Glen Darty, Lake Wales, Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Rivers Buford, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

John W. Burton, Wauchula, for appellee.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

On May 24, 1967, we filed an opinion which reversed a decree validating certain certificates of indebtedness allegedly issued for the appellee District. By petition for rehearing the appellee has brought to our attention the enactment of House Bill 2238 and House Bill 2239, both of which became laws on June 8, 1967. It is insisted that these enactments constitute valid curative legislation which thereby remedies the defects found to infect the proceeding which culminated in the final decree initially submitted to us for review. By the petition for rehearing we are requested to give effect to the statutes in our appellate deliberations on the case or alternatively to remand the entire matter to the trial judge with authority to reconsider the cause in the light of these 1967 enactments. We have elected to follow the latter course and the appellant has advised us that no objection is offered. The prayer of the petition is granted.

Our opinion of May 24, 1967, is therefore withdrawn and the cause is remanded to the trial court for reconsideration and rede-termination in the light of the cited legislation which was enacted while it was pending here. The trial judge is authorized to allow such amendments of pleadings and take such further proceedings as appear appropriate in the premises. See Northeast Polk County Hospital District et al., v. Snively et al., Fla., 162 So.2d 657; Board of Public Instruction of Orange County v. Budget Commission, Fla., 167 So.2d 305; Myers v. Board of Public Assistance of Hillsborough County, Fla., 163 So.2d 289.

It is so ordered.

O’CONNELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY P ROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2) , SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH C AROLINA In The Supreme Court

The State, Respondent,

v.
Tiffany Ann Sanders, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2020

- 001390

Appeal f rom Dorchester County Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court Judge

Memorandum Opinion No. 2022 -MO- 004 Heard February 3, 2022 – Filed February 23, 2022

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Elizabeth Franklin

- Best, of Elizabeth Franklin

- Best, P.C.
, of Columbia
, for Petitioner

. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melod y J. Brown, and Assistant Attorney General W. J oseph Maye, of Columbia
, and David M. Pascoe Jr., of Orangeburg
, for Respondent

.PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Sanders , Op. No. 2020

- UP

- 237 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Aug. 12, 2020). We now dismiss as improvidently granted. 1

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

. BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW, JJ., and Acting Justice H. Bruce Williams, concur.

1 This disposition is without prejudice to f u rther rights and remedies that may be available to Petitioner as provided by law.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50767 Summary Calendar

MARY D. MONROE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus SHIRLEY S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-94-CA-836 JN

- - - - - - - - - - August 28, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Mary Monroe appeals the district court's affirmance of the Commissioner's decision denying her social security disability benefits. Monroe argues that the findings of the administrative law judge (ALJ) are not supported by relevant legal standards and substantial evidence. We have carefully reviewed the record and the arguments. We detect no error. Accordingly, we affirm forNo. - 2 - essentially the same reasons given by the district court. See Monroe v. Chater , No. A-94-CA-836 JN (W.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 1995). AFFIRMED.
#### Ulysses C. LEMON, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-444.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 22, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
EXHIBIT 21




                       LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


o        iProcure, Inc.
o        Datastream Systems International, Inc.
o        Datastream FSC, Inc.
o        SQL Systems Group, B.V.
o        Datastream Systems, BV
o        Datastream Systems (UK), Ltd.
o        Datastream, SA
o        SQL System Participates, BV
o        SQL Systems Deutschland, GmbH
o        Datastream Systems, GmbH
o        Datastream Insta Holding GmbH
o        Datastream Systems GmbH & Co. KG
o        Asystum Participations, BV
o        Datastream Systems Ireland Ltd.
o        Sikasso Pte Ltd.
o        Datastream-SIS Pte Ltd.
o        Datastream Systems Pty Ltd.
o        Computec Sistemas S.A.
o        Datastream Systems de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
o        Datastream Servicios Mexicanos, S. de R.L. de C.V.
o        Datastream Systems do Brasil Ltda.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                                December 17, 2003

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Frank's Nursery
Crafts, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended November 2, 2003 (the
"Report"), as filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, the undersigned, Alan J. Minker, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
such officer's knowledge:

         3.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         4.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
             of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
             Report.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as
of the date first above written.


                                                     /s/ Alan J. Minker
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Alan J. Minker
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
#### Ezell WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-371.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 20, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 20, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Joseph Thomas LOBAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-412.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 13, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and John Lipinski, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Stephen V. Rosin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of State v. Frazier, Fla.App. 1970, 239 So.2d 630.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THE QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         171,957
<SECURITIES>                                     3,008
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,388
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,244)
<INVENTORY>                                     56,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               267,322
<PP&E>                                          59,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,311)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 674,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,206
<BONDS>                                         46,884
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    207,000
<COMMON>                                        69,119
<OTHER-SE>                                     219,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   674,748
<SALES>                                        189,510
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               189,510
<CGS>                                          124,715
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  255,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (63,298)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,203
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (64,501)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   5,267
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (59,234)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)
        

</TABLE>
(S^^v^-5^^X^-t(' "* t76^(:V:^--^^^T'V^i:5--^t3 

POUR MOUNTAINS,. LLC 

40aoa Mclay Road - Homer, At; 99603 * Ann Oberiftner ann@-4-Mciuntains.com 907.235.7510 * Mark Ervic* mec0@xy2.net 907.235.0144 

May 7, 2010 

The Honorable Sean Pamell ' : 

Office of the Governor 

P.O. Box 110001 

Juneau, Alaska 99811-001 ^3 

Dear Governor Pamell: S 

We, Four Mountains, LLC, are a general contracting firm which recently completed a project in 

Nikolski. We arrived in Nikolski on April 13 after bumping two other passengers who agreed to wait 

for the next flight because PenAir could not take our tools and baggage with six passengers. There 

was not another PenAir flight to Nikolski until April 23, which brought five passengers to Nikolski 

with carry-on baggage only and no priority mail. PenAir did send some priority mail on the April 13 

flight, but nothing bigger than letters. 

In preparation for the job, we sent on March 27 a priority mail box (22 lb. 2.6 oz) with materials and 

supplies to Nikolski. It arrived May 5, nine days after we left. When our scheduled flight to leave 

Nikolski on April 26 did not arrive, we were able to hop on a flight chartered by the U.S. Census 

because they were not willing to leave their census worker for days on end in Nikolski. 

We have worked in the Aleutians since 1994 and certainly understand the problems with weather and 

equipment, but since PenAir's Goose-only flights to Nikolski, there has been a dramatic degradation 

of service. No one in Nikolski is happy with PenAir. One resident said that this winter and spring 

PenAir has had on average one flight every three weeks. It is remarkable to us when we read the 

Essential Air Service requirements that PenAir gets paid whether they really service Nikolski or not. 

In our opinion PenAir is not fulfilling its Essential Air Service contract for Nikolski or its U.S. Postal 

Service contract requirements. 

Regards, 

Mark Ervice Ann Oberlitner 

cc: PenAir, Daimy Seybert, President 

U.S. Postal Service, Postmaster, Dutch Harbor, AK 

U.S. Postal Service, Diane Horbochuk, AK District Manager 

ADOT, Leo von Scheben, Commissioner 

USDOT, FAA Alaska Region Airports Division, AAL-600, Byron K. Huffman
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 170 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 170

   Requesting the President to designate July 2, 1993, as ``Thurgood 
                            Marshall Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 1993

 Mr. Rangel submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
             the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Requesting the President to designate July 2, 1993, as ``Thurgood 
                            Marshall Day''.

Whereas, in 1967, Thurgood Marshall was appointed as the 1st African-American 
        Justice to sit on the Supreme Court of the United States;
Whereas Thurgood Marshall had a distinguished legal career, as a civil rights 
        leader for more than 6 decades and as an Associate Justice of the 
        Supreme Court for 24 years;
Whereas Thurgood Marshall was the 1st African-American Solicitor General when he 
        served in that post from 1965 through 1967;
Whereas Thurgood Marshall was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals 
        for the 2d Circuit in 1961;
Whereas, as a Judge for the Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit, Thurgood 
        Marshall wrote 112 opinions, none of which were reversed on appeal;
Whereas Thurgood Marshall successfully argued the landmark school desegregation 
        case, Brown v. Board of Education, which the Supreme Court decided in 
        1954;
Whereas Thurgood Marshall successfully argued 29 out of 32 cases before the 
        Supreme Court, 14 as a private lawyer and 18 as Solicitor General;
Whereas, during his tenure on the Supreme Court, Thurgood Marshall remained 
        committed to equality of opportunity for all Americans, as he 
        demonstrated in his famous dissent in San Antonio Independent School 
        District v. Rodriguez, the 1973 decision in which he opined that equal 
        educational opportunity is a fundamental right protected by the 
        Constitution of the United States;
Whereas Thurgood Marshall mentored and trained a generation of young lawyers 
        through the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund and, as its head from 
        1940 through 1961, championed minority rights;
Whereas Thurgood Marshall was a pioneer in the legal profession and expanded the 
        opportunities available to African-Americans, as well as to other 
        Americans; and
Whereas Thurgood Marshall was the preeminent civil rights lawyer of the 20th 
        century: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives requests the President 
to issue a proclamation honoring the accomplishments and memory of 
Thurgood Marshall and designating July 2, 1993, the date of Thurgood 
Marshall's birth, as ``Thurgood Marshall Day''.

                                 <all>
```
is served by mail, three (3) days shall be added to the prescribed period."). 

Appellant's notice of appeal, however, was not filed in the district court 

until March 31, 2015, eight days beyond the relevant appeal period. "[A]n 

untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. 

State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). 

Under this court's holding in Kellogg v. Journal 

Communications, if appellant delivered his notice of appeal to a prison 

official for mailing on or before March 23, 2015, his notice of appeal would 

be deemed timely filed. 108 Nev. 474, 477, 835 P.2d 12, 13 (1992) (holding 

that a notice of appeal is deemed "filed" when it is delivered to a prison 

official). Likewise, NRAP 4(d) provides that a notice of appeal "is timely if 

it is delivered to a prison official for mailing on or before the last day for 

filing." NRAP 4(d) further provides that when the prison has a notice of 

appeal log or another system designed for legal mail, the prisoner must 

use the logs to receive the benefit of this rule. Because appellant signed 

his notice of appeal on March 23, 2015, this court directed the attorney 

general to obtain and transmit a copy of the notice of appeal log. If 

appellant did not use the notice of appeal log, the attorney general was to 

inform this court whether appellant used any other logs. 

On June 3, 2015, the attorney general submitted a timely 

response. The attorney general indicates that the prison maintains both a 

notice of appeal log and a legal mail log. It appears that appellant did not 

use the notice of appeal log, but did use the legal mail log on March 24, 

2015, one day after the date appellant's notice of appeal was due. This 

court's decision in Kellogg contemplates that the date of delivery of the 

notice of appeal to a prison official will be determined by the date recorded 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

((I) 1947A e 
in the prison mail log. Id. at 476-77, 835 P.2d at 13. Because appellant's 

notice of appeal was untimely delivered to prison officials, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

Saitta 

Gibboris Pickering 

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge 

Marvin D. Perkins 

Attorney General/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

3 

(0) 1947A 44e47/
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Sutura, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
fourth quarter of 2007 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors
and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 Date:    April 15, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Richard BjorkmanRichard BjorkmanChief Financial Officer