alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION IX
 

75 Hawthorne Street
 

San Francisco, CA 94105
 

NOV 17 2011 Mr. Fred Mollenhauer 

Catalyst Paper 

P. O. Box 128 

Snovvflake,Puizona 85937 

Dear Mr. Mollenhauer: 

I am vvriting to inform you that EPA Region 9 is developing a partial Regional Haze Federal 

Implementation Plan (FIP) for the state of Puizona. The purpose of the Regional Haze FIP is to improve 

visibility in national parks and vvildemess areas in Puizona and surrounding states as required by Section 

169A ofthe Clean Air Act (Act). During the process of developing the Puizona Regional Haze State 

Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted to EPA on March 2, 2011, the Puizona Department of 

Environmental Quality (ADEQ) performed a five-factor Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) 

analysis for the Snovvflake Paper Mill. We vvill revisit ADEQ's determination, and possibly conduct a 

nevv five-factor BART analysis, to determine vvhether any additional emissions controls are vvarranted 

under section 169A(b)(2)(A) ofthe Act, and EPA's implementing regulations and BART guidelines at 

40 CFR Part 51, Subpart P and Appendix Y. 

As vve begin our FIP analysis, vve have requested that ADEQ provide us vvith all background materials, 

including BART analyses, that vvere performed by them or the affected facilities. We may also request 

that you provide us vvith additional information on the Snovvflake Paper Mill as our analysis proceeds. In 

the meantime, vve vvelcome the submission of any additional, relevant information that you vvould like to 

provide to our office. 

EPA has entered into a consent decree that requires the Agency to propose approval of Arizona's 

Regional Haze SIP and/or propose a Regional Haze FIP that meets the requirements of the Act and 

EPA's regional haze regulations by May 15, 2012. The consent decree also requires the Agency to take 

final action on the Puizona Regional Haze SIP and/or FIP by November 15,2012. EPA Region 9 vvill 

hold public hearings in Puizona and solicit public comments on a proposed Puizona Regional Haze FIP 

in the months preceding the November 15 deadline. 

If you vvould like to submit any additional information or analysis, vve request that you send it by 

February 29,2012. Any modeling of the facility should use the regulatory versions of CALPUFF 

(version 5.8, level 070623), CALMET (version 5.8, level 070623), and CALPOST (version 6.221). You 

may vvish to prepare a modeling protocol and consult vvith EPA Region 9 about the preparation of 

modeling inputs in accord vvith EPA guidance. Submit any information to: 

Thomas Webb 

US EPA (AIR-2) 

75 Havvthome Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 
You can also reach Thomas at webb.thomas@epa.gov or by phone at 415-947-4139. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please contact Thomas Webb or 

myself (mckaughan.colle n@epa.gov, 520-498-0118). 

Sincerely, 

&j/::vf~ Associate Director, Air Division 

cc:	 Henry R. Darwin, ADEQ 

Eric Massey, ADEQ
### Notes from Meeting with **Environmental Technology Council**

**Attended by:** ETC Staff

: David Case , James Williams ETC Members: Scott Kuhn (Clean Harbors), Bob Garner (Veolia), Tom Baker (Veolia),

Nick Maoloni (Ross Environmental), Steve Nay lor (EnviroSAFE), Armand Johnson, and others EPA Staff: Kristin Fitzgerald , Jessica Young, Lisa Lauer Date: October 20 , 2011

EPA m et with representative s and members of Environmental Technology Council (ETC) to discuss their comments on the Universal Waste proposal in more detail and to provide an update on the pharmaceuticals proposed rule. ETC indicated that pharmaceuticals that are hazardous due to metal content have enough organics that they

may be combusted. ETC also discussed the intersection of RCRA and DEA regulations.
Process diagram-sites controlled by submitter-use
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John W. WILKERSON.

No. 62678.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: John W. Wilkerson, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Jefferson.

*1213Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issued herein, directing the Honorable Floyd W. Newlin Judge of the 24th Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Jefferson, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 15th day of September, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this court at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
#### The CLINTON COMPANY, Appellant, v. Max LEVINSON, Appellee.

No. 71-843.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 12, 1972.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; James M. Reasbeck, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Calendar No. 126

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 588

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. Utah, as the ‘‘Abe Murdock United States Post al Service located at 20 South Main in Beaver,

JUNE 30, 1993

Reported without amendment
II

Calendar No. 126

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 588

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

JUNE 30, 1993

Reported by Mr. GLENN, without amendment

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 20 South Main in Beaver, Utah, as the ‘‘Abe

Murdock United States Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 20 South Main in Beaver, Utah, is designated

6 as the ‘‘Abe Murdock United States Post Office

7 Building’’.
2

•HR 588 RS

1 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in any law, regulation, document,

3 record, map, or other paper of the United States to the

4 facility referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference

5 to the ‘‘Abe Murdock United States Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS OF GARAN, INCORPORATED
AND SUBSIDIARIES ANNEXED HERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,744,000               1,744,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               39,503,000              39,503,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   512,000                 512,000
<INVENTORY>                                 65,867,000              65,867,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           113,559,000             113,559,000
<PP&E>                                      42,693,000              42,693,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,500,000              27,500,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             156,934,000             156,934,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,802,000              34,802,000
<BONDS>                                      2,130,000               2,130,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     2,536,000               2,536,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 115,181,000             115,181,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               156,934,000             156,934,000
<SALES>                                     47,941,000             155,954,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,941,000             155,954,000
<CGS>                                       35,900,000             119,108,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,900,000             119,108,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,258,000              21,228,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,000                  75,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,273,000              17,445,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,188,000               7,239,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,085,000              10,206,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,085,000              10,206,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.60                    1.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60                    1.93


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERNALLY
PREPARED FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,210,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,165,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   136,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,571,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,459,000
<PP&E>                                       5,698,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,876,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,853,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,114,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       933,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,119,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,853,000
<SALES>                                      4,120,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,324,000
<CGS>                                        2,017,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,239,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,614,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (96,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             238,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                126,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             88,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    88,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 249 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 249

   Electing Representative Montgomery to act as Speaker pro tempore.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 1993

 Mr. Derrick submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Electing Representative Montgomery to act as Speaker pro tempore.

    Resolved, That the Honorable G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery, a 
Representative from the State of Mississippi, be, and he is hereby, 
elected Speaker pro tempore during any absence of the Speaker, such 
authority to continue not later than September 15, 1993.
    Resolved, That the President and the Senate be notified by the 
Clerk of the election of the Honorable G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery as 
Speaker pro tempore during the absence of the Speaker.

                                 <all>
```
#### JAMES GRAHAM *vs.*TINCEY MOORE.

Dower, before assignment, may not be taken in execution.

Rule to show cause why a sale of land should not be set aside.

The property sold in this case was the right of Tincey Moore, as tenant in dower, in the lands of her late husband; and the dower had not been laid off.

*319
      *Cullen,*for the rule.

*Saulsbury*and *McFee,*contra.

Graham was the purchaser; and now objected to the sale, because he could get no .title ; the dower (not assigned) being no estate liable to be levied on or sold. (13 *Wend. Rep.,*524; 10 *Ib.,*414, 528; 2 *Cowen's Rep.,*638; 1 *Cruise Dig.,*131, 194-5; 14 *Mass. Rep.,*378.)

*Mr. Saulsbury*said, *caveat emptor;*but the court set aside the sale.

Rule absolute.
# C_2021165EN.01000101.xml

| 4.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2019-2020 SESSION

Sittings of 2 to 4 July 2019

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 85, 12.3.2021.

TEXTS ADOPTED

Sittings of 15 to 18 July 2019

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 95, 19.3.2021.

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
No. 48.

#### Daisy M. Scott et al. *v.*The City of Columbus, Ohio.

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio.

Motion to dismiss submitted October 5, 1925.

Decided October 12, 1925.

*Per Curiam.*

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon authority of *Erie Railroad*
      *529v. *Solomon,*237 U. S. 427, 431. *Mr. Charles A. Leach*for defendant in error, in support of the motion.

*Messrs. Timothy S. Hogan*and *John S. Hogan*for plaintiffs in error, in opposition thereto.'
pounders&associates 

May 9, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE 

Reference: DOT-OST-2008-0209, 2001-10685, 2009-0305, 2000-7856 

EAS- Muscle Shoals, AL; Greenville, MS; Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS; Tupelo, MS 

Mr. DeVany: 

As a local business persoR and member of the Shoals Chamber of Commerce Air Services 

Committee, I am pleased to offer my support to the proposal from Silver Airways to provide essential 

air service at Muscle Shoals as a replacement for the current Delta Air Lines service. 

Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air 

transportation system is critical to the economic well being of the Shoals area and to the Shoals 

Chamber of Commerce. 

Silver Airways proposes a modern 34-seat turboprop aircraft and flights to Atlanta. As you well 

know, Atlanta is the largest hub airport in the world and a popular business and leisure travel 

destination from the Shoals in its own right. 

We believe that the service proposal from Silver Airways is the best option for retaining our local air 

service and increasing boardings in hopes that government subsidies can be reduced or eliminated. 

I encourage the Department of Transportation to approve Silver Airways as the designated carrier 

for essential air services in the Shoals. 

Sincerely, 

Please note our new address: 164 Ana Drive, Florence, AL 35630 

J ~g ana drive, liuite -e- • florence, alabama 35630 • (256) 766-0998 • fax (256) 766-9281
#### STRIPE et al., RECEIVERS, *v.*UNITED STATES.

certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the ■ SECOND CIRCUIT.

No. 496.

Submitted November 23,1925.

Decided January 11, 1926.

Decided upon the authority of *Price*v. *United States, ante,*p. 492. 6 Fed. (2d) 752, affirmed.

*Messrs. Ben. A. Matthews*and *Harold Harper,*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Mitchell*and *Messrs. Jerome Michael, Henry Gale,*and *Ralph F. Fuchs,*Special Assistants to the Attorney General, for the United. States.

Mr. Justice Butler

delivered the .opinion of the Court.

In this case there is presented the question whether, in the distribution of the assets of Johnson Shipyards Corporation among its creditors by receivers appointed in an equity suit, the United States under R. S. § 3466 is entitled to have its claim against the corporation for taxes first satisfied. The facts (300 Fed. 952) are in all respects similar to those in *Price*v. *United States, ante,*p. 492. The question of law involved is identical. The United States is entitled to priority.

*Decree affirmed.*
#### Clyde A. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Q. RAWLS, Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, The TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11809.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

March 28, 1972.

Ford E. Stinson, Benton, for plaintiff-appellant Clyde A. Carter.

Cook, Clark, Egan, Yancey & King, by Benjamin C. King, Shreveport, for defendant-third-party plaintiff-appellant John Q. Rawls.

Blanchard, Walker, O’Quin & Roberts, by Wilton H. Williams, Jr., Shreveport, for third-party defendant-appellee Travelers Ins. Co.

Before AYRES, PRICE and HALL, JJ.

HALL, Judge.

This is a companion suit to that of Ryan v. Rawls decided this day. 260 So.2d 137 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1972).

It was stipulated that the property damage to plaintiff’s school bus caused by the accident amounted to $605.32.

For the reasons assigned in our opinion in the companion suit, the judgment of the district court rejecting plaintiff’s demands is reversed and it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed, that there be judgment in favor of plaintiff, Clyde A. Carter, and against defendant, John Q. Rawls, in the full sum of $605.32, together with legal interest thereon from date of judicial demand until paid. The judgment of the district court rejecting the third party demand of John Q. Rawls against The Travelers Insurance Company is affirmed. Defendant-appellant, John Q. Rawls, is assessed with all costs of these proceedings.

Affirmed m part, reversed in part and rendered.
**ro**

### 3c**3*3P****-p- ^** ***ro co** **CO /to** 

### -s V## A-**'*'«-'*■■**

## //**/9**

# y/H
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 277

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives respecting unfunded

mandates.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 15, 1993

Mr. CONDIT (for himself, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. MORAN, Mr. CLINGER, Mr.

PETE GEREN of Texas, Mr. POMBO, Mr. BARCA of Wisconsin, and Mr.

GOODLING) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Operations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives

respecting unfunded mandates.

Whereas an estimated 100 unfunded mandates are enacted

by Congress every decade;

Whereas State, county, and municipal governments are facing

increased financial burdens due to the proliferation of

Federal mandates and decreasing Federal funds to pay

for these requirements; and

Whereas unfunded Federal mandates are estimated to cost

the American public more than $430,000,000,000 annually: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that steps must be taken to alleviate the fi-
2

•HRES 277 IH

1 nancial impact of unfunded Federal mandates on State,

2 county, and municipal governments.

Æ
EXHIBIT
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We have
issued our reports dated March 6, 2008, accompanying the financial statements
and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the Annual Report of SCOLR Pharma, Inc. on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of
SCOLR Pharma, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-129275, File
No. 333-123316, File No. 333-113949), on Form S-2 (File
No. 333-107906) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-116922, File
No. 333-40290, File No. 333-79343).










Seattle,
Washington


March 6,
2008
<PAGE>

                                                       Exhibit 21.1



                              C*ATS SOFTWARE, INC.
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


C*ATS SOFTWARE UK LTD.
Roman House
Wood Street
London, EC2Y SBA UK

C*ATS SOFTWARE AG
10 Route de L'Englise
CH-1291 Commungny, Switzerland

C*ATS SOFTWARE JAPAN K.K.
NTF Takebashi Bldg, 8th Floor
3-15 Kanda-Nishikicho
Chlyode-ku, Tokyo 101 Japan

C*ATS SUB, INC.
1825 Century Park East
Suite 2120
Los Angeles, CA 90067
#### JEHU BENNETT, p. b. app’t. *vs.*THOMAS R. MOORE, d. b. resp’t.

The assignee of a judgment note has recourse, if he use diligence against the maker. Suit must be brought promptly ; unless the maker bo notoriously insolvent.

Appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace. Harr in assumpsit, on the usual counts.

This was an action of assumpsit by the assignee of a judgment note against the obligor, the maker having failed to pay it. The note was executed under seal by Joshua H. Irons to Thomas R. Moore, on the 13th of September, 1848, for $40, with power of attorney to entér judgment, and stay of execution for six months. The note was assigned on the day it was executed, by Thomas R. Moore to Jehu Bennett, who caused judgment to be entered on the 12th of January, 1850. Joshua H. Irons died insolvent on the 15th of January, 1850; but was solvent as late as October, 1849.

The question was, whether the assignee had any recourse against the assignors.

*McFee*and *Houston,*for plaintiff.

*Layton,*for defendant.

*By the*Court.

A case is found in *Wilson’s Red Book*to the effect that assumpsit will lie by the assignee against the assignor of a bond or note; on the principle that the assignment is a guaranty of the debt by the assignor, provided the assignee use due diligence in the collection of the money. It has long been held that such diligence required the assignee of a bond to commence suit to the next term after the bond fell due. An exception to the requirement of prompt suit, is where the obligor or maker is openly and notoriously insolvent. In that case, on the principle that the want of funds at the place of payment excuses the presentment and notice there, the assignee is excused from suing. (2 *Harr. Rep.,*28; 2 *Ibid,*468.) The question of diligence is a question of law, and the case before the court is not one of such doubt upon the facts as would induce us to refer this question to the jury.

Judgment on this note might have been entered on the 13th of September, 1848, and execution might have issued thereon on the 13th of March, 1849. Joshua H. Irons lived until the 15th of January, 1850; and no proceeding was taken to collect the note, until a few days before his death, viz: the 12th of January, 1850. There is no proof of Irons’ insolvency in March, 1849; on the contrary, it is proved that he was solvent as late as October, 1849.

Plaintiff nonsuited.