alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.06


$10,000.00

May 16, 2001


                             DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE

     As hereinafter agreed Instanet, Inc. promises to pay to the order of
Business Development Corp $10,000 (ten thousand dollars). And it is hereby
agreed that said $10,000.00 shall be repaid at the earlier of June 30, 2002 or
the closing of Instanet, Inc. offering.

     Interest at the rate of Twelve Percent (12%) per annum will be charged on
the unpaid balance until the whole amount of the principal and interest is paid.

     Should default be made in the payment of the demand note then the whole
unpaid amount shall become immediately due and payable; and in the event default
is made and said note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection or
suit is bought on the same, then the undersigned agrees to pay all costs and
attorneys' fees that might be incurred.

                                            Instanet, Inc.



                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Earnest Mathis











<PAGE>



$20,000.00


March 1, 2001


                             DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


     As hereinafter agreed Instanet, Inc. promises to pay to the order of
Business Development Corp $20,000 (twenty thousand dollars). And it is hereby
agreed that said $20,000.00 shall be repaid at the earlier of June 30, 2002 or
the closing of Instanet, Inc. offering.

     Interest at the rate of Twelve Percent (12%) per annum will be charged on
the unpaid balance until the whole amount of the principal and interest is paid.

     Should default be made in the payment of the demand note then the whole
unpaid amount shall become immediately due and payable; and in the event default
is made and said note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection or
suit is bought on the same, then the undersigned agrees to pay all costs and
attorneys' fees that might be incurred.

                                            Instanet, Inc.



                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Earnest Mathis
# Official Journal L 107I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 107I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 656 April 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 107I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 656 April 2022

---

| Contents | | | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | |
| | * | Commission Recommendation (EU) 2022/554 of 5 April 2022 on the recognition of qualifications for people fleeing Russia’s invasion of Ukraine | 1 |

Contents

page

*

Commission Recommendation (EU) 2022/554 of 5 April 2022 on the recognition of qualifications for people fleeing Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 157 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 157

Referring the bill (H.R. 1752) for the relief of Sergeant Major Earnest 
Sands (Retired) and Roger Sands to the chief judge of the United States 
                             Claims Court.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 1993

Mr. Hyde submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Referring the bill (H.R. 1752) for the relief of Sergeant Major Earnest 
Sands (Retired) and Roger Sands to the chief judge of the United States 
                             Claims Court.

    Resolved, That the bill (H.R. 1752) entitled ``A bill for the 
relief of Sergeant Major Earnest Sands (Retired) and Roger Sands'', now 
pending in the House of Representatives, together with all accompanying 
papers, is referred to the chief judge of the United States Claims 
Court pursuant to section 1492 of title 28, United States Code, for 
proceedings in accordance with section 2509 of such title.

                                 <all>
```
# Email Protection

## You are unable to access this email address gpo.gov

The website from which you got to this page is protected by Cloudflare. Email addresses on that page have been hidden in order to keep them from being accessed by malicious bots. **You must enable Javascript in your browser in order to decode the e-mail address**.

If you have a website and are interested in protecting it in a similar way, you can sign up for Cloudflare.

                  - How does Cloudflare protect email addresses on website from spammers?
                  - Can I sign up for Cloudflare?

Cloudflare Ray ID: **875cb6a2c96ef275**•      Your IP:      Click to reveal68.60.74.180•Performance & security byCloudflare
#### Vandal Craig JENKINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40785.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 12, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 242 So.2d 881.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, Mc-CAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
261 La. 1037

#### Beulah Lejeune MATTE et al. v. CONTINENTAL TRAILWAYS, INC.

No. 52410.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 1972.

In re: Beulah Lejeune Matte et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Plaquemines. 259 So.2d 653.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
256 La. 861

#### Andrew EDWARDS v. Bernice EDWARDS et al.

No. 50777.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 30, 1970.

In re: Byard Edwards and Bernice Edwards applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 236 So.2d 592.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
82^%-o

P,toJbDL.a.-2£>& .CAPxT^L STATIQlV -TDCLl\-a0^ IBZS&8M

j^iMarU »Ti. ^oT I\ i-AC-C 6udt.i\ iJurr

UL At)£L A/2CKTA.

GvJ4*l£_ -fcHouu3LJfr.Tf t/H Pfr It 0/^,1 in ,Q_£j2ntZ- Z££} - \ ,

pp/yirv lj&- £2,SiB- AI -bra. 3a-fc5^^ToLJ! iau.CG/u^caIcd

A\3&jt as ljiU' L^L_\dA-lL_£iJ U u A^P^L'^^L x-T^J U

ULTRAS .bE£U faiCd . /Vjr) UU dcC££X SM££T tojCj&itD

UlEuJ d ATE5 dUrJ LlEAAL P&5Cfc3u£iL CGUrliXLlEd Il\ -kh£j£.

O&Sfc^Lid UA«JUC2_. :lil_\ 0£rifc2_TO PiC£££r) AULA CS\Y\£2_

L££&L f5T£f> LlLrie^TO ££S£>\\f£l MU C42s£ /kid TO &££cd

Ptose L2rr Aj<d u^a^sTo^^Cfijcrb.TD-Cc^fErrtu

6oae ^jcoour to l^iaat Wvs Dceu d&JC:iKA mu L£^\L

P/ZAC££di^l65,rL ujculri WLkI&U 7nO_Afr^LL ID UOuSi£.

RECEIVED IN ^^ Jd^t^ A, COURT OFCRIMINALAPPEALS £j2£l.\£\X3 /£lA£dA -MATA

APR 0! 2015 • T^rMC** \82^D8M

AbalAeosftLCferk
Page 1 of 2 

North Dakota Regional Haze 

EPA-R08-OAR-2010-0406 

Boilers Equipped with SNCR and that are Controlling NOx to under 0.17 lb/MMBtu

(from 2010 annual Title IV data) 

STATE FACILITY_NAME Unique ID OP_YEAR NOX_RATE OWNER UNIT TYPE PRIMARY FUEL NOX_CONTROL_MA Salem Harbor 1626_1 2010 0.158 Dominion Energy 

Salem Harbor, LLC (Owner/Operator) 

Dry bottom wall-fired boiler 

Bit Selective Non-cat

Reduction Low NTechnology (Dry 

MA Salem Harbor 1626_2 2010 0.1634 Dominion Energy 

Salem Harbor, LLC (Owner/Operator) 

Dry bottom wall-fired boiler 

Bit Selective Non-cat

Reduction Low NTechnology (Dry 

MA Somerset 1613_8 2010 0.1263 Somerset Power, LLC 

(Owner/Operator) 

Tangentially- fired Bit Selective Non-cat

Reduction CombuModification/Fue

MN Taconite 

Harbor Energy Center 

10075_1 2010 0.1393 Minnesota Power, 

Inc. (Owner/Operator) 

Tangentially- fired Sub Overfire Air Selec

catalytic Reductio

MN Taconite 

Harbor Energy Center 

10075_2 2010 0.1458 Minnesota Power, 

Inc. (Owner/Operator) 

Tangentially- fired Sub Overfire Air Selec

catalytic Reductio

TX Big Brown 3497_1 2010 0.1376 Big Brown Power 

Company LLC (Owner) Luminant Generation Company LLC (Operator) 

Tangentially- fired Lignite Low NOx Burner 

Separated OFA Secatalytic Reductio
Page 2 of 2 

Boilers Equipped with SNCR and that are Controlling NOx to under 0.17 lb/MMBtu

(from 2010 annual Title IV data) 

STATE FACILITY_NAME Unique ID OP_YEAR NOX_RATE OWNER UNIT TYPE PRIMARY FUEL NOX_CONTROL_TX Big Brown 3497_2 2010 0.1437 Big Brown Power 

Company LLC (Owner) Luminant Generation Company LLC (Operator) 

Tangentially- fired Lignite Low NOx Burner 

Separated OFA Secatalytic Reductio

TX Monticello 6147_1 2010 0.1294 Luminant Generation 

Company LLC (Owner/Operator) 

Tangentially- fired Lignite Low NOx Burner 

Separated OFA Secatalytic Reductio

TX Monticello 6147_2 2010 0.1315 Luminant Generation 

Company LLC (Owner/Operator) 

Tangentially- fired Lignite Low NOx Burner 

Separated OFA Secatalytic Reductio

WI Edgewater 

(4050) 

4050_4 2010 0.1464 Wisconsin Public 

Service Corporation (Owner) Wisconsin Power & Light Company (Owner/Operator) 

Cyclone boiler 

Sub Overfire Air Othe

Non-catalytic Red

Note: Facilities listed in red italics are referenced as examples in EPA’s final rule for North Dakota regional haze.
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

Add 1 he work hours. parts cost, and number (?!U.S. N!Kistered produ<.:ts to I he table below. iVhen you are 

.finis lied. click 0111he '·Update Fields" hut/on to autOJJW/ical!y fill int!te totals. 

Update Fields I 

Actions and cost estimates are for both left and right thrust reversers (TIR) halves, four TIR halves 

tot a lfi or b h ot ene:mes . on an a a. I rpl an e. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) 

Do no/ (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Remove T/R halves 

36 $ '. {){lj 1,(1 ~~ lj(,!) (HI 55 "- 1 M-i.3(1() IJ\1 II 

Figure I & 4 - Remove 

fire seals, insulation 

blanket 

6.6 retainer/deflector, and ' -,, l (II) ·, .:;C,f Oll 55 ~~~ \ "" () 

fire seal retainers 

Figure 2 & 5 - Install 

insulation blanket 

retainer, fire seal 10.0 " S50J)(, 9,472 "J I P. ~22.no 55 S'(, ... 1 n n( retainers (kept), and 

seal supports 

Figure 3 & 6 - Install 

new fire seals * 1.0 \ 8.).0(1 "- ~--dO 55 ' (, ... ( 

Identify Left and Right 

T/R halves 1.0 ... g .lUI ' !{' On 55 l ( .. ' Ill 

Reinstall T/R halves 

36 \ ~.0(,(1/1 

\}.Ot>O.iJO 55 ';)~-~11(),'111 (l 

::- 0.(1(1 ~ II.Otl ' 1!.0!! 

\ 0.1111 \ (I Ill) "' 1;.011 

"' ii. (l( " ii.IJII ~ O.tlt! 

U.tl I ' 0 Ool I} uu 

' . 0.00 0.(!{; 0 ilrl 

\ 1).00 ' t! (\il ~) 0.\ ~(l 

,. 

'> () 00 ', 0.1\ll (I (.It) 

'1i 0.00 ~ i) ()0 \ 0.00 

'j, 0 .00 ,. 

:- 0.00 \ 0.00 

\ I) .00 \ O.Oll ~ (l.f\(; 

The known number of products in compliance: Number 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $944,515 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) Warrant~ 

* Fire seal part cost is included in the kit (kit# 005W0021-I and -2) cost of$9,472. 
On-Condition Costs: .... 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

Inspection <; 0 . i)t) «; il.()!l 

\ (1.00 .., (I (lt! 

,. 

-~ 0.00 ' t t\1) 

\ (l_()i) s ~~ {j!l 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? , 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ' 

YES* 0 NO ~ 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. ~ 

YES 0 NO~ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation:
#### JOHN CAMPBELL *vs.*ELISHA CAREY.

On a scire facias there must be proof of the original judgment.

A judgment is presumed to be paid after twenty years, unless, &c.

A return of “ levied to the amount,” is a payment, unless the levy be otherwise disposed of.

Certiorari to Justice Shockley.

The suit was docketed as an “ action on an execution on the docket of George Clendaniel, Esq. Date of judgment entered by S. Hurt, Esq., 24th of May, 1828. 1852, July 1, scire facias issued to Constable White, returned “ made known July 8, 1852.” The defendant appeared and failed to show cause why execution should not be had against him, judgment rendered for $8 91 and costs 50 cents. Execution issued, with clause of attachment, and John Jones summoned as garnishee ; on whose answer judgment was rendered against him 7th January, 1853, for $11 00.”

Justice Shockley also returned that the judgment docket of S. Hurt, Esq., had never been in his possession ; that neither judgment, nor execution could be found; and the scire facias was issued on the docket entry of the execution, dated May 24, 1828. The next entry was of an alias execution, issued July 14, 1834; the execution not found. April 24, 1834, venditioni issued, returned “ property levied on and appraised to $95, and remaining unsold 5th September, 1835.” April 29,1839, alias execution attachment issued; and returned “ no levy for want of goods.” [This execution was not found.] May 4, 1840, alias execution attachment issued and returned “ property sold and bid off by the plaintiff, John Campbell, Esq,” September 23, 1840. [This execution was not found.]

The exceptions were—1. That there was no proof of any judgment upon which the scire facias issued. 2. If there was any such judgment, it was recovered on the 24th of May, 1828, and the scire facias was issued upon it more than twenty-four years after, without any affidavit that it had not been paid, and after it was presumed by law to have been paid. 3. That the said judgment was paid by the execution process issued thereon, and the returns thereto, viz: by a levy to the amount of $95; and a return of “ property bid off by plaintiff.”

On these exceptions, the Court reversed the entire proceedings.

*Mr. Houston,*for plaintiff in error.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 29115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13361]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of Intent To Terminate 
Receivership

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (FDIC or Receiver) as Receiver for the institution listed 
below intends to terminate its receivership for said institution.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                     Date of
               Fund                   Receivership name             City              State       appointment of
                                                                                                     receiver
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10401.............................  Blue Ridge Savings     Asheville............  NC                 10/14/2011
                                     Bank, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The liquidation of the assets for the receivership has been 
completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance 
with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to 
proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing, 
identify the receivership to which the comment pertains, and sent 
within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, 
Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, 
Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated at Washington, DC, on June 18, 2018.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-13361 Filed 6-21-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
256 La. 912

#### SEWERAGE AND WATER BOARD OF NEW ORLEANS v. Jack SANDERS d/b/a Laguna Construction Company et al.

No. 50936.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 9, 1970.

In re: Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 239 So.2d 414.

Writ refused. The judgment is not final.
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the
Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/  Gerald D. KelferGerald D. KelferPresident and Chief Executive Officer
# Official Journal C 20/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 20 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5921 January 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 20

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5921 January 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 020/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 020/1

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 020/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7818 — McKesson/UDG Healthcare (pharmaceutical wholesale and associated businesses)) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 020/3 | Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 3 |
| 2016/C 020/4 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 10 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 020/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7818 — McKesson/UDG Healthcare (pharmaceutical wholesale and associated businesses)) (
  1
  )

1

2

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2016/C 020/3

Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

3

2016/C 020/4

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2325

_____________________________

MARLON MOORE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

J. Lee Marsh, Judge.

November 22, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and B.L. THOMAS and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Marlon Moore, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Zachary Lawton, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 26, 2012

t1217

Order 

December 26, 2012

144941 & (15)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144941

COA: 307894

Jackson CC: 04-001348-FC

LOREN DEPREE GREENE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 22, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

compel discovery is DENIED.