alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBITS TO BE FILED BY EDGAR



Exhibits



               (12)   Statements  Showing  Computation  of Ratio of  Earnings to
                      Fixed  Charges and Ratio of  Earnings  to  Combined  Fixed
                      Charges  and  Preferred   Stock  Dividends  Based  on  SEC
                      Regulation S-K, Item 503

                      A - GPU, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
                      B - JCP&L
                      C - Met-Ed
                      D - Penelec

               (27)   Financial Data Schedules

                          A - GPU, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
                          B - JCP&L
                          C - Met-Ed
                          D - Penelec
#### THE STATE *vs.*THOMAS SMITH.

Indictments for disturbing religious worship need not specify the *place.*

The defendant was indicted and convicted for disturbing a religious society of Methodists, in Mispillion hundred, assembled for the purpose of religious worship.

*Mr. Comegys*

moved in arrest of judgment, that the indictment was not sufficiently certain as to place. Religious meetings of the Methodists were held at other places in Mispillion hundred, than at the private house where this meeting was held, and this indictment did not certainly inform the defendant *what*meeting he was charged with disturbing. *(Russ. Cr.,*837, *n.)*

*The Court*

denied the motion, saying: the indictment is in the usual form, and is framed under the act of assembly. Even without an act of assembly, this would be an indictable offence, as the Christian religion is protected by the common law. Unless time or place enter into the crime itself, it is not material to state or prove it. The locality of a road enters into the charge of obstructing it. But as to disturbing a religious society, the place is unimportant, if within the county. It is not necessary that the place should be specifically laid to guard against another trial, for the identity of the two cases is to be tried by the jury, on a plea of former acquittal or conviction.
EXHIBIT 21.1



PC MALL, INC.



Subsidiaries of the Registrant



Following are the subsidiaries of PC Mall, Inc., other than those which if considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary would not constitute a
significant subsidiary, and the state or other jurisdiction in which each subsidiary was incorporated or organized.



|                         |  |                              
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|SUBSIDIARY               |  | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
|AF Services, LLC.        |  | Delaware                     
|CCIT, Inc.               |  | Delaware                     
|ecost.com, Inc           |  | Delaware                     
|eLinux.com, Inc.         |  | Delaware                     
|Mall Marketing, Inc.     |  | Delaware                     
|Onsale, Inc.             |  | Delaware                     
|PC Mall Canada Inc.      |  | Quebec                       
|PC Mall Gov, Inc         |  | Delaware                     
|PC Mall Sales, Inc.      |  | California                   
|SIFY, Inc.               |  | Delaware                     
|WF Acquisition Sub, Inc. |  | Delaware
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 847 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 847

  To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to 
 plan and design an extension of the National Air and Space Museum at 
    Washington Dulles International Airport, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1993

 Mr. Mineta (for himself, Mr. Natcher, and Mr. McDade) introduced the 
     following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to 
 plan and design an extension of the National Air and Space Museum at 
    Washington Dulles International Airport, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Board of 
Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized to plan and design 
an extension of the National Air and Space Museum at Washington Dulles 
International Airport.
    Sec. 2. Effective October 1, 1994, there is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution 
$8,000,000 to carry out the purposes of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      Exhibit 12

                   GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY
        Statement of the Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                  (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


(Dollars in Millions)                                                                             Six Months Ended
                                                                                                    June 30, 1999
<S>                                                                                               <C>

Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income from continuing operations                                                                    $ 343.1
  Add  - Income taxes                                                                                    235.1
       - Fixed charges                                                                                    75.1
                                                                                                       -------
Adjusted earnings                                                                                      $ 653.3
                                                                                                       =======
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                                                                      $ 71.5
  Portion of rent expense representing interest                                                            3.6
                                                                                                       -------
Adjusted fixed charges                                                                                  $ 75.1
                                                                                                       =======
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                                                        8.70

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          27,120
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  340,645
<ALLOWANCES>                                    59,550
<INVENTORY>                                    172,167
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,042,950
<PP&E>                                         648,432
<DEPRECIATION>                                 224,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,802,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,516,892
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     16,318
<COMMON>                                        90,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,583,847
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,802,875
<SALES>                                        124,536
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               711,850
<CGS>                                           84,963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  477,726
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               716,326
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,669
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (537,395)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (150,190)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (387,205)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (387,205)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.30)


</TABLE>
#### JOHN SMITH and MARGARET his wife *vs.*PETER JOHNSON.

A declaration laying a promise to husband and wife, on a note to the wife dum sola, is good.

The action was on a promissory note made by the defendant to Margaret Johnson, now the wife of Smith. The execution of the note was admitted, but

*Mr. Huffington*objected to the admissibility of the note under a declaration laying a promise to Smith and wife.

*Mr. Bayard*said the objection would be more proper in arrest of judgment. But he said the declaration was in the proper form, stating the making and delivery of the note to the wife, the obliga- . tian and consequent promise to pay husband and wife.

The plaintiff had a verdict, which—

The court, upon consideration, sustained, and gave judgment accordingly. -
#### Alberto GUERRERO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1062.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 19, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### CITY OF MIAMI, Petitioner, v. Marilynne H. AYRES, Respondent.

No. 71-1095.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 9, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
# L_2013156EN.01S00301.xml

| 8.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 156/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 156/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
# C_2004094EN.01000502.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/5

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

11 March 2004

In Case C-9/02 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État): Hughes de Lasteyrie du Saillant v Ministère de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie (1)

1

(Freedom of establishment - Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 43 EC) - Tax legislation - Transfer of residence for tax purposes to another Member State - Methods of taxing increased value of securities)

(2004/C 94/09)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-9/02: References to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Conseil d'État (France) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Hughes de Lasteyrie du Saillant and Ministère de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie, on the interpretation of Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 43 EC), the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans (Rapporteur), acting for the President of the Fifth Chamber, A. La Pergola and S. von Bahr, Judges; J. Mischo, Advocate General; H.A. Rühl, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 11 March 2004, in which it has ruled:

The principle of freedom of establishment laid down by Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 43 EC) must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from establishing, in order to prevent a risk of tax avoidance, a mechanism for taxing as yet unrealised increases in value such as that laid down by Article 167a of the French Code Général des Impôts, where a taxpayer transfers his tax residence outside that State.

---

(1)  OJ C 56 of 2.03.2002.

1

---
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Fabian DIAZ, Relator, v. The Honorable Paul BAKER, as Judge of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, in and for Dade County, Criminal Division, Respondent.

No. 73-138.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 8, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
# C_2015007EN.01003401.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2014 — Out of the blue v OHIM — Dubois and Another (FUNNY BANDS)

(Case T-344/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark FUNNY BANDS - Earlier national trade name FUNNY BANDS - Earlier national Internet domain name ‘www.funny-bands.com’ - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Use of a sign in the course of trade of more than mere local significance - Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Rejection of the opposition))

(2015/C 007/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Out of the blue KG (Lilienthal, Germany) (represented by: G. Hasselblatt and D. Kipping, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Frédéric Dubois (Lasne, Belgium) and Another

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 April 2013 (Case R 542/2012-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Out of the blue KG and Mr Frédéric Dubois and Another.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Out of the blue KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Out of the blue KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000039092
<NAME> FRIEDMAN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         891,433
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,223,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 17,186,521
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,461,915
<PP&E>                                      14,523,673
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,152,656
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,848,509
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,844,696
<BONDS>                                      5,600,000
<COMMON>                                     5,834,195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,071,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,848,509
<SALES>                                     25,559,420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,559,420
<CGS>                                       23,526,339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,396,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             144,520
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,037,054
<INCOME-TAX>                                   352,598
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            684,456
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   684,456
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.12
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,As adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Binding Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2004, (the "Report"), I, DennisJ. Martin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
# Official Journal C 180/2 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 180 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 582 June 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 180

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 582 June 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2015/C 180/01 | Report on budgetary and financial management for the financial year 2014 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2015/C 180/01

Report on budgetary and financial management for the financial year 2014

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### SAMUEL PLATT *vs.*WALDREN C. HOOK.

On certiorari the exceptions to the record must be signed.

Certiorabi.

The defendant filed exceptions, without any signature.

*353
      *Mr. Gordon*moved to affirm the judgment, on the ground that no exceptions were filed. The statement on the face of the exceptions that the defendant appears and files exceptions is nothing, without a signature, as it is not the act of any one, either to bind him, or to require that it should be noticed by the other party, without signature.

The motion was resisted by *Mr.*Johnson, (who however, did not file the exceptions,) but the court affirmed the judgment, on the ground taken.

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                             Verizon Northwest Inc.

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              Six Months Ended
(Dollars in Millions)                                          June 30, 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                   <C>
Income before provision for income taxes                             $146.5
Equity in income from affiliate                                         (.1)
Interest expense                                                       21.8
Portion of rent expense representing interest                           8.2
Amortization of capitalized interest                                     .3
                                                              ------------------

Earnings, as adjusted                                                $176.7
                                                              ==================

Fixed charges:
Interest expense                                                     $ 21.8
Portion of rent expense representing interest                           8.2
Capitalized interest                                                     .7
                                                              ------------------

Fixed Charges                                                        $ 30.7
                                                              ==================

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                     5.76
                                                              ==================
</TABLE>
|Exhibit 31(b)                                                                              
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification                                                     
|I, Moray P. Dewhurst, Chief Financial Officer of FPL Group, Inc. (FPL Group), certify that:
|1.                                                                                         
|2.                                                                                         
|3.                                                                                         
|4.                                                                                         
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|5.                                                                                         
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Date:   November 11, 2003                                                                  
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|