alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of
Directors
Coastal Financial Corporation: We consent
    to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-52212,
    333-01274, 333-49741, 333-54794, and 333-114040) on Forms S-8 of Coastal Financial
    Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated December 14, 2006, with respect
    to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Coastal Financial
    Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related
    consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive
    income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
    September 30, 2006, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
    control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006, and the effectiveness
    of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006, which
    reports are incorporated by reference in the September 30, 2006 Annual Report
    on Form 10-K of Coastal Financial Corporation. Our reports refer to the fact
    that Coastal Financial Corporation and subsidiaries adopted, October 1, 2005,
    the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123R, Share-Based
    Payment. /s/ KPMG LLP Raleigh, North
Carolina
December 14, 2006 43
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20832

Conference Calendar

RONNIE DAVIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH; DR. JOHN STOBO, President;

GENE MCMASTERS, Practice Manager; GLENDA ADAMS, M.D.;

JULIA LAWSON, P.A.,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CV-2104

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ronnie Davis, Texas prisoner # 1250016, appeals the district

court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure

to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Davis alleged

that the defendants’ treatment constituted deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs. 

We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim

on which relief can be granted. Scanlan v. Texas A&M Univ.,

343 F.3d 533, 536 (5th Cir. 2003). Unsuccessful medical
No. 05-20832

-2-

treatment does not give rise to a § 1983 cause of action. 

Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). In

addition, a physician’s failure to follow the advice of another

physician is not evidence of deliberate indifference. Stewart v.

Murphy, 174 F.3d 530, 535 (5th Cir. 1999). While Davis may have

disagreed with the treatment he received from prison medical

staff, their level of care does not demonstrate deliberate

indifference to his medical needs. See Varnado, 920 F.2d at 321. 

Davis is cautioned that the district court’s dismissal of

his complaint for failure to state a claim counts as a strike

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d

383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). He is also cautioned that if he

accumulates three strikes under § 1915(g), he will not be able to

proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed

while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is

under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). 

AFFIRMED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
#### CANAVERAL MARINE, INC., etc., Petitioner, v. CANAVERAL PORT AUTHORITY, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 41031.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 15, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 244 So.2d 764.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
263 La. 93

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. George R. TERRELL v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52669.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 17, 1972.

In re: George R. Terrell applying for writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition and/or certiorari.

Writ refused. Since relator has served his sentence and has been finally discharged from custody, the questions raised by his application are now moot.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 30821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14002]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


VA National Academic Affiliations Council, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act that the VA National Academic 
Affiliations Council (NAAC) will meet via conference call on July 11, 
2018, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EST. The meeting is open to the 
public.
    The purpose of the Council is to advise the Secretary on matters 
affecting partnerships between VA and its academic affiliates.
    On July 11, 2018, the Council will explore the current 
modernization effort within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA); 
receive a briefing on the VHA electronic health record modernization 
program; discuss provisions of the recently enacted Public Law 115-182 
that impacts VA's clinical education mission; and receive updates on 
the waiver process for VA employees engaging in teaching activities 
with for-profit educational institutions; the activities of the 
Council's Subcommittee on Diversity and Inclusion; the June 13, 2018 
Roundtable of Graduate Medical Education hosted by the House Committee 
on Veterans' Affairs; and the recent efforts of the VA Strategic 
Academic Advisory Council. The Council will receive public comments 
from 11:50 p.m. to 12:00 p.m. EST.
    Interested persons may attend and/or present oral statements to the 
Council. The dial in number to attend the conference call is: 1-800-
767-1750. At the prompt, enter access code 66983 then press #. 
Individuals seeking to present oral statements are invited to submit a 
1-2 page summary of their comments at the time of the meeting for 
inclusion in the official meeting record. Oral presentations will be 
limited to five minutes or less, depending on the number of 
participants. Interested parties may also provide written comments for 
review by the Council prior to the meeting or at any time, by email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#580b2c3d2e3d760c2a2136372b3321182e39763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fcaf88998a99d2a88e8592938f9785bc8a9dd29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>, or by mail to Stephen K. Trynosky J.D., M.P.H., 
M.M.A.S., Designated Federal Officer, Office of Academic Affiliations 
(10A2D), 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420. Any member of the 
public wishing to participate or seeking additional information should 
contact Mr. Trynosky via email or by phone at (202) 461-6723.

    Dated: June 26, 2018.
Jelessa M. Burney,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-14002 Filed 6-28-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### EXPERIENCE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. CROWN INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., a Florida corporation, Respondent.

No. 70-1295.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 8, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.
H. Res. 132

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

March 18, 1993.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider further in the House the bill

(H.R. 1335) making emergency supplemental appropriations

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for other

purposes. All points of order against the bill are waived. It

shall be in order to consider one amendment, if offered by the

chairman of the Committee on Appropriations. The amendment shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for ten

minutes equally divided and controlled by the proponent and

an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall

not be subject to a demand for division of the question. All

points of order against the amendment are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the amendment and on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit, if offered by Representative Michel of Illinois or his designee. A motion to recommit
2

HRES 132 EH

with instructions shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent.

Attest:

Clerk.
# Official Journal C 493/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 493 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 648 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 493

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 648 December 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2021/C 493/01 | Position (EU) No 36/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU Adopted by the Council on 9 November 2021 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 493/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 36/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU | 31 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2021/C 493/01

Position (EU) No 36/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU Adopted by the Council on 9 November 2021 (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 493/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 36/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on health technology assessment and amending Directive 2011/24/EU

31

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION


Fortified Window and Door Company, f.k.a. AAPC One Acquisition Corporation
AAPC Two Acquisition Corporation
AAPC Three Acquisition Corporation
AAPC Four Acquisition Corporation
AAPC Five Acquisition Corporation
AAPC Six Acquisition Corporation
American Glassmith, Inc.
American Weather-Seal Company
Binnings Building Products, Inc.
Danvid Window Company
Denver Window Company
Eagle & Taylor Company
Eagle Window & Door Center, Inc.
Forte, Inc.
Modern Window Corporation
Thermetic Glass, Inc.
VinylSource, Inc.
WIG Liquidation Company
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A1355. CONFESOR CHAPARRO v. THE STATE.

In 2004, Confesor Chaparro was convicted of four counts of aggravated child

molestation and on appeal, this Court affirmed his convictions.Chaparro v. State, 279

Ga.App. 145 (630 SE2d 645) (2006).1In November 2023, Chaparro filed a motion to

vacate his sentence, claiming that it was illegal and therefore void. On December 14,

2023, the trial court entered an order denying the motion to vacate. Chaparro

subsequently moved to vacate the trial court’s December 14 order, arguing that he had

not received notice of the same until the deadline for filing an appeal had passed. On

March 19, 2024, the trial court denied that motion. Chaparro filed this direct appeal

on April 15, 2024, explicitly seeking to appeal only the December 14 order. We lack

jurisdiction.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or trial

court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). And the proper and timely

filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon an

appellate court. Redford v. State, 357 Ga.App. 247, 250 (850 SE2d 447) (2020). Here,

1

Since that time, Chaparro has filed a number of motions seeking postconviction relief, with the trial court denying each of those motions. The trial court’s

orders resulted in either an application or a direct appeal to this Court, each of which

was either denied or dismissed. See Case Nos. A22A0592 (appeal dismissed Dec. 13,

2021);A19A1643 (appeal dismissedApril 10, 2019); A17A2057 (appeal dismissed July

21,2017); A14D0056 (application deniedOct. 18, 2013); A11A1862 (appeal dismissed

June 20, 2011); A08D0343 (application dismissed May 2, 2008); A08D0111

(application dismissed Nov. 19, 2007).

May 21, 2024
Chaparro filed his notice of appeal 123 days after entry of the December 14 order

denying his motion to vacate his sentence. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to

consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/21/2024
#### MAYOR, &c., OF WILMINGTON *vs.*JOHN HEDGES and JOHN McCLUNG.

The rule for aEdavit of defence, under *Code,*2305, applies to the case of an indorser of a promissory note.

The action was against the defendants, as indorsers of Joseph S. Hedges, on a promissory note drawn by him, in favor of defendants, and endorsed by them to plaintiffs, a copy of which was filed, and affidavit made under section 4, *Code,*377.

*Mr. L. Wales,*for plaintiff,

moved for judgment by default at the return of the process, for want of an affidavit of defence.

*Mr. Gordon*

objected that this was not an action on the note, but to charge the defendants on their guaranty of endorsement, which was the cause of action as to them; and that, therefore, the case did not come within the provisions of the *Code,*authorizing summary judgments.

*422
      *Wales,*for plaintiff.

*Cordon,*for defendant.

*The Court*

thought otherwise, and ordered the judgment as moved ; but *Mr. Cordon*then objected that the affidavit was made by the treasurer of the city corporation, and there was no provision in the law that this officer should swear in this respect for the corporation. The court assented to this; but said they would correct it by the general rules, which they were about to establish under authority of law.

Judgment refused for want of an affidavit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           2,582
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                       312
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,894
<PP&E>                                           2,505
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,167
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,617
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,448
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            22
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,617
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,997
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    514
<INCOME-TAX>                                       200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                314
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       314
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
From: "Penrod, W ayne" <W Penrod@sunflower.net>

To: Lanelle W iggins/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "Cronmiller, Rae E." <rae.cronmiller@nreca.coop>, Mark Rondeau <mrondeau@wcrf.com> Date: 07/27/2011 06:06 PM Subject: SER Comments - EGU NSPS for GHG 

### Attached plea se find Mid - Kansas comments relating to the SER Panel convened by EPA to receive information related to small business impacts that might be attributed to the subject rulemaking. 

## Wayne Penrod Executive Manager, Environmental Policy PO Box 1020 Hays, KS 6 7601 (785) 623 -3313 (785) 650 -9004 (cell)

Mid - Kansas GHG NSPS SBREFA SER Panel comments.docx
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12

GTE California Incorporated and Subsidiary

STATEMENT OF THE CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Six Months Ended
                                              June 30, 1998
                                             ----------------
<S>                                              <C>     
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income from continuing operations              $289,967
  Add - Income taxes                              193,335
        - Fixed charges                            71,758
                                                 --------

Adjusted earnings                                $555,060
                                                 ========

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                               $ 64,897
  Portion of rent expense
      representing interest                         6,861
                                                 --------

Adjusted fixed charges                           $ 71,758
                                                 ========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                   7.74
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         101,948
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,630
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,374)
<INVENTORY>                                     56,356
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               207,152
<PP&E>                                          54,505
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,296)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 559,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,724
<BONDS>                                         43,773
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    207,000
<COMMON>                                        69,162
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   559,532
<SALES>                                        132,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,647
<CGS>                                           79,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  148,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (6,929)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,672)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       205
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,877)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,877)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
    connection with the Amended Annual Report of Apollo Gold Corporation (the
    Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2003
    as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
    Report), I, R. Llee Chapman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
    do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
    906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  ****Date: January 20, 2005
By:
/s/ R. Llee ChapmanR. Llee ChapmanChief Financial Officer
#### James R. OTTESEN et al., Appellants, v. Robert G. LOWE and Doris M. Lowe, Appellees.

No. 71-990.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 12, 1972.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; James M. Reasbeck, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 21.1





List of Subsidiaries





|1. |  | Aeolus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------




|2. |  | Incara Cell Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------




|3. |  | Incara Development, Ltd., a Bermuda corporation of which the Registrant owns all of the common stock and 60.2% of the preferred stock.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|4. |  | CPEC LLC, a Delaware limited liability company of which the Registrant owns 35% of the equity capital.
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
256 La. 913

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Paul GEORGE, Thomas Perrin, Guy Glynn, Darrell Morris and Robert Albright v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 50937.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 9, 1970.

In re: Paul George et al. applying for writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition and/or injunction.

Writ refused. The trial court has ordered a hearing.