alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statement of operations and
consolidated statement of cash flows included in the Company's Form 10-K for the
period ended June 27, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1997
<CASH>                                          28,923
<SECURITIES>                                    44,301
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,658
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,775
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,538
<PP&E>                                           9,620
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,275
<BONDS>                                              9
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           252
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,101
<SALES>                                         78,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,358
<CGS>                                           27,262
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,854
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,963
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,891
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,891
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
        

</TABLE>
HeinOnline -- 38 Fed. Reg. 1254 1973HeinOnline -- 38 Fed. Reg. 1255 1973HeinOnline -- 38 Fed. Reg. 1256 1973HeinOnline -- 38 Fed. Reg. 1257 1973
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 176

Impeaching Robert F. Collins, a judge of the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana, of high crimes and misdemeanors.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1993

Mr. SENSENBRENNER submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Impeaching Robert F. Collins, a judge of the United States

District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana,

of high crimes and misdemeanors.

1 Resolved, That Robert F. Collins, a judge of the

2 United States District Court for the Eastern District of

3 Louisiana, is impeached of high crimes and misdemeanors.

Æ
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 292

Providing for the designation of certain minority employees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 2, 1993

Mr. MICHEL submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Providing for the designation of certain minority employees.

1 Resolved, That pursuant to the Legislative Pay Act

2 of 1929, as amended, the sixth of the minority employees

3 authorized therein shall be David K. Kehl, effective No4 vember 1, 1993, to fill an existing vacancy until otherwise

5 ordered by the House, to receive gross compensation pur6 suant to the provisions of House Resolution 119, Ninety7 fifth Congress, as enacted into permanent law by section

8 115 of Public Law 95–94.

Æ
No. 738.

#### New Orleans Public Belt Railroad *v.*James Davis.

Error to the Supreme Court of the State 6f Louisiana.

Motion to dismiss submitted October • 26, 1925.

'Decided November 23, 1925.

*Messrs. W. L. Gleason*and *E. M. Miner*for defendant in error, in support of the motion.

*Mr. Percy S. Benedict*for plaintiff in error, in opposition thereto. •

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of *Central Land Co.*v. *Laidley,*159 U. S. 103, 112; *Tracy*v. *Ginzberg,*205 U. S. 170, 178; *Bonner*v. *Gorman,*213 U. S. 86, 91; *Milwaukee Electric Ry. Co.*v. *Milwaukee, 253*U. S. 100, 106.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


             FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES AND EARNINGS USED IN PER SHARE
                                   COMPUTATION
                        (DOLLARS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  MARCH 31,
                                                            ----------------------
                                                             2001            2000
                                                             ----            ----
<S>                                                         <C>             <C>
The weighted average number of shares of
  Common Stock were as follows ......................       90,000          90,000
                                                            ======          ======
</TABLE>

     Income used in the computation of earnings per share were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  MARCH 31,
                                                          ------------------------
CONSOLIDATED                                                2001            2000
                                                          --------        --------

<S>                                                       <C>             <C>
Net earnings ........................................     $ 23,150        $ 23,094

Dividends paid on preferred stocks ..................         (130)           (130)
                                                          --------        --------

                                                          --------        --------
Income used in per share computation of earnings.....     $ 23,020        $ 22,964
                                                          ========        ========
Basic and fully dilutive earnings per share .........     $   0.26        $   0.26
                                                          ========        ========
</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Chang Fe Lin, Appellant.

[722 NYS2d 155]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J.), rendered September 22, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the first degree and one count of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to two concurrent terms of 9 to 18 years concurrent with a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the sentence and remanding for resentencing, and otherwise affirmed.

Photographic identification testimony was rendered admissible by a complainant’s unexplained statement during cross-examination that he had viewed photographs, coupled with information elicited by defendant that the other complainant had viewed pictures on the day of the incident and made a misidentification as to the codefendant. These sets of facts left the jury to speculate that unfavorable evidence was being withheld by the prosecution and to draw an unfair inference that the complainant in question was unable to identify defendant after viewing photographs (see, *People v Cuiman,*229 AD2d 280, *lv denied*90 NY2d 903).

Any error in the admission of testimony that defendant and his codefendant were acquaintances who were living in the same apartment 11 months after the incident would be harmless in the context of this case.

Defendant’s challenges to the prosecutor’s summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the challenged comments were fair comment on the evidence and reasonable inferences that could be drawn therefrom, and were responsive to the defense summation *(see, People v Overlee,*236 AD2d 133, *lv denied*91 NY2d 976; *People v D’Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114, 118-119, *lv denied*81 NY2d 884).

As the People concede, defendant’s request for an adjournment at the time of sentence should have been granted pursuant to CPL 400.21 (6). Accordingly, defendant is entitled to resentencing.

We have considered defendant’s remaining claims and conclude that they do not warrant reversal. Concur — Andrias, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 310 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 310

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a 5-day 
   waiting period before floor action on legislation, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 10, 1993

Mr. Pombo submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a 5-day 
   waiting period before floor action on legislation, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Resolved, That (a) the first sentence of clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI 
of the Rules of the House of Representatives is amended by striking 
``third'' and inserting ``fifth''.
    (b) Clause 7 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by striking ``three'' and inserting 
``five''.
    (c) The first sentence of clause 2(a) of rule XXVIII of the Rules 
of the House of Representatives is amended by striking ``third'' and 
inserting ``fifth'' and by striking ``; but the preceding provisions of 
this sentence do not apply during the last six days of the session''.
    (d) The last sentence of clause 4(b) of rule XI of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives is amended by inserting before the period at 
the end the following: ``; nor shall it report any rule or order which 
provides that clause 2(l)(6) of this rule, clause 7 of rule XXI, or 
clause 2(a) of rule XXVIII may be waived by a vote of less than two-
thirds of the Members present.''.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SkillSoft Public
Limited Company (the "Company") for the period ended January 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Charles E. Moran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: April 15, 2005                     /s/ Charles E. Moran
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Charles E. Moran
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 13-1632 UNITED STATES, Appellee,

v. JOSÉ A. GARCÍA-ORTIZ, Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on July 6, 2015, is amended as follows: On page 4, line 1, change "back seat" to "backseat". On page 20, line 7, change "the" to "The".
H. Res. 261

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

September 29, 1993.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 2403) making appropriations for the Treasury

Department, the United States Postal Service, the Executive

Office of the President, and certain Independent Agencies,

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for other

purposes. All points of order against the conference report

and against its consideration are waived.

Attest:

Clerk.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00426

- CV

IN RE HAROLD NEIL JA COBSON, M.D. RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

We have considered “ Relator ’ s Unopposed Motion To D ismiss Original

Proceeding .” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted;

therefore, we dismiss this original proceeding.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and WALKER, J.

DELIVERED: February 3 , 2014

1 See Tex . R. App. P. 47.4.
# Official Journal L 181/13 J

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 181 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4813 July 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 181

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4813 July 2005

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Commission Decision of 22 June 2005 amending Decisions 2001/881/EC and 2002/459/EC as regards the list of border inspection posts
  (notified under document number C(2005) 1835)


   (1) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Decision of 23 June 2005 on the eligibility of expenditure to be incurred by certain Member States in 2005 for the collection and management of the data needed to conduct the common fisheries policy
  (notified under document number C(2005) 1858) | 31 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Commission

*

Commission Decision of 22 June 2005 amending Decisions 2001/881/EC and 2002/459/EC as regards the list of border inspection posts
  (notified under document number C(2005) 1835)


   (1)

(notified under document number C(2005) 1835)

1

*

Commission Decision of 23 June 2005 on the eligibility of expenditure to be incurred by certain Member States in 2005 for the collection and management of the data needed to conduct the common fisheries policy
  (notified under document number C(2005) 1858)

31

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 21



LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AND THEIR COUNTRY OR STATE OF INCORPORATION/ORGANIZATION



|  |  |                                                    |  |                    
|- |  | -------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
| |  | iProcure, Inc.                                     |  | Delaware           
| |  | Datastream Systems International, Inc.             |  | Delaware           
| |  | Datastream FSC, Inc.                               |  | U.S. Virgin Islands
| |  | SQL Group, B.V.                                    |  | The Netherlands    
| |  | Datastream Systems, BV                             |  | The Netherlands    
| |  | Datastream Systems (UK), Ltd.                      |  | The United Kingdom 
| |  | Datastream, SA                                     |  | France             
| |  | SQL System Participates, BV                        |  | The Netherlands    
| |  | SQL Systems Deutschland, GmbH                      |  | Germany            
| |  | Datastream Systems, GmbH                           |  | Germany            
| |  | Datastream Insta Holding GmbH                      |  | Germany            
| |  | Datastream Systems GmbH & Co. KG                   |  | Germany            
| |  | Asystum Participations, BV                         |  | The Netherlands    
| |  | Datastream Systems Ireland Ltd.                    |  | Ireland            
| |  | Sikasso Pte Ltd.                                   |  | Singapore          
| |  | Datastream Systems Pte Ltd.                        |  | Singapore          
| |  | Datastream Systems Sdn Bhd                         |  | Malaysia           
| |  | Strategic Business Management Sdn Bhd              |  | Brunei             
| |  | Datastream Systems Co., Ltd.                       |  | China              
| |  | Datastream Systems Pte Ltd.                        |  | Japan              
| |  | Datastream Systems Kabushiki Kaisha                |  | Japan              
| |  | Datastream Systems Co., Ltd.                       |  | Japan              
| |  | Datastream Systems Pty Ltd.                        |  | Australia          
| |  | Computec Sistemas S.A.                             |  | Argentina          
| |  | Datastream Systems de Mexico S.A. de C.V.          |  | Mexico             
| |  | Datastream Servicios Mexicanos, S. de R.L. de C.V. |  | Mexico             
| |  | Datastream Systems do Brasil Ltda.                 |  | Brazil             
| |  | Datastream Systems de Chile SRL                    |  | Chile              
| |  | Perville, SA                                       |  | Uruguay            
| |  | Datastream Systems Latinamerica SRL                |  | Uruguay
[No. 900-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

December 20, 1971.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Moira Burns Bordman, *Appellant.*
Federal Housing Administration

Ginnie Mae’s mortgage-backed securities (MBS) program is the conduit for FHA-insured mortgage

lending, sourcing worldwide capital to finance single-family housing, multifamily housing, home equity

conversion mortgages (HECM), manufactured housing, hospital loans, and residential healthcare

properties. In Fiscal Year 2021, FHA mortgage loans accounted for 49.2% of all newly issued Ginnie

Mae MBS. In fact, Ginnie Mae MBS are considered the best source of capital for FHA lenders,

evidenced by the fact that 98.6% of FHA fixed-rate mortgage loans insured in 2021 were packaged

into Ginnie Mae MBS.

Ginnie Mae MBS and their support for FHA lending are vital to closing the homeownership gap.

Traditionally, FHA has been an important source of mortgage credit for households of color. For

example, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data shows FHA’s share of lending to Black

and Hispanic borrowers is twice that of the rest of the market.

Ginnie Mae’s FHA Multifamily and Healthcare programs consist of loans originated for the purchase,

construction, or renovation of apartment buildings, hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living facilities,
and other housing options. At the end of fiscal year 2021, Ginnie Mae guaranteed securities comprised

99.6% of eligible multifamily FHA loans. 

FHA offers two paths to financing for manufactured homes, which are an important source of

affordable housing supply. Under its Title II home mortgage program, FHA permits manufactured

homes that are permanently affixed to land to obtain the same residential mortgage financing as a

traditionally built home, making them eligible collateral for Ginnie Mae Single Family MBS. Under its

Title I program, FHA insures chattel loans for manufactured (mobile) homes whether or not the land

underneath is included. In support of FHA’s Title I manufactured home loans, Ginnie Mae's MBS

program provides a guaranty for securities collateralized by Title I manufactured home loans insured

by FHA for the purchase of a new or used manufactured home. This program provides liquidity in

the market that lowers costs for borrowers. FHA’s Title I manufactured housing program consists of

more affordable housing alternatives for first time and low-income borrowers. Title I manufactured

housing loans include loans secured by a manufactured (mobile) home unit or both the manufactured

unit and land. Following FHA’s modernization of its program, Ginnie Mae also revised its

Manufactured Housing MBS program to offer a new securitization outlet for Title I manufactured

home loans. At the end of Fiscal Year 2021, Title I manufactured home loans backing Ginnie Mae

MBS had an unpaid principal balance of $196.0 million. 

For more information on FHA mortgage programs, please visit www.fha.gov.
Pugh, Theresa to: RobertJ Wayland, Bill Maxwell
11/03/2011 01:41 PM

We assume that you may be invited to join in on the OMB meeting with APPA this morning. Here is our handout

Thank you

OMB talking points re MACT (3) (4).docx
#### WILLIAM GIBBONS’ Adm’r. *vs.*HENRY GIBBONS.

In the matter of the proceeds of sale of the real estate of Henry Gibbons.

The sheriff brought into court the proceeds of sale of a house and lot in Wilmington, sold as the property of Henry Gibbons. It was sold on a mortgage executed by him, and the proceeds were claimed by the administrators of William Gibbons, deceased, and by the defendant’s execution creditors. „

*Mr. Gilpin,*

for the administrators of William Gibbons, moved for leave to take the money out of court on an affidavit, that the mortgaged premises were a mere leasehold interest for two thousand years, the freehold and fee simple being in the Swedes Lutheran Church; and on the ground that the judgments against Henry Gibbins, were no lien on the leasehold interest.

*46Subsequently to these judgments, Henry Gibbons conveyed and assigned the leasehold property to William Gibbons.

On hearing the motion in behalf of the representative of the personal estate, leave was granted.

Rule absolute.
#### HENRY MAY, d. b. plff. in error, vs. CURRY & DAVIS, plffs. b. defts. in error.

A writ of error will not lie to the decision of a court granting or refusing a nonsuit.

Writ of error to the Superior Court. Heard before the Chancellor, and Judges Booth and Hazzard.

The case is fully set out ante p. 173, &c., and was argued in error on the same points by *Layton*and *Clayton,*for the defendant below, and by *Houston,*for the plaintiffs; but the court affirmed the judgment on another ground, to wit: that a writ of error will not lie to the judgment of a court granting or refusing a nonsuit.