alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 15

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Shareholders

Frischs Restaurants, Inc.

We have
reviewed the accompanying interim consolidated balance sheet of Frischs Restaurants, Inc. (an Ohio Corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 11, 2005, the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders equity and cash
flows for the twenty-eight and twelve week periods ended December 11, 2005 and December 12, 2004. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information
consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheet as of May 29, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated July 22, 2005, except for
Note B as to which the date is February 17, 2006, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                      
|----------------------
|GRANT THORNTON LLP    
|                      
|/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
|                      
|Cincinnati, Ohio      
|March 17, 2006
ro

3c

3*3P

-p-

^*

ro

co

CO

/to

-s VA-

'*'«-'*■■
//
/9

y/H
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 259 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 89

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 259

                          [Report No. 103-259]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2295) making appropriations for foreign operations, export 
 financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 1994, and making supplemental appropriations for such programs for 
   the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 28, 1993

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                  House Calendar No. 89
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 259

                          [Report No. 103-259]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2295) making appropriations for foreign operations, export 
 financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 1994, and making supplemental appropriations for such programs for 
   the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1993

   Mr. Derrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2295) making appropriations for foreign operations, export 
 financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 1994, and making supplemental appropriations for such programs for 
   the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2295) making appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, 
and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and 
making supplemental appropriations for such programs for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 1993, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against the conference report and against its consideration are 
waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
```
261 La. 1061

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. William BERSCH v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52429.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 1972.

In re: William Bersch applying for remedial writs and writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. Considering the evidence adduced at the hearing in the trial court, the ruling is correct.
#### Edward SAXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-565.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 13, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 224

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that

signatures on discharge petitions be made public immediately.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 22, 1993

Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland (for himself, Mr. HOKE, Mr. HUFFINGTON, Mr.

MILLER of Florida, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. KIM,

Mr. BARTON of Texas, and Mr. SHAYS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

require that signatures on discharge petitions be made

public immediately.

1 Resolved, That the first undesignated paragraph of

2 clause 3 of rule XXVII of the Rules of the House of Rep3 resentatives is amended by inserting after the third sen4 tence the following new sentence: ‘‘A current list of the

5 names of all Members signing each such motion shall be

6 made available by the Clerk for public inspection during

7 normal working hours.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32 to 10-KSB

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report of Prologic Management Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James M. Heim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to
the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                           /s/ James M. Heim
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           James M. Heim
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Prologic Management Systems, Inc.
                                           August 3, 2005

                                       26
<PAGE>

                                           EXHIBIT 11

                                GATEWAY GATHERING SYSTEMS, INC.

                    STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   Three Months Ended        Nine Months Ended
                                                       November 30              November 30
                                                 -----------------------   -----------------------
                                                   1995         1994         1995        1994
                                                 ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
<S>                                              <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES
    OUTSTANDING                                  26,036,081   19,777,267   23,127,623   19,287,707
ADD SHARES ISSUABLE ASSUMING CONVERSION
    OF SERIES C PREFERRED STOCK INTO
    COMMON STOCK                                    140,625      124,375      140,625      118,958
                                                 ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
TENTATIVE NUMBER OF SHARES FOR COMPUTATION
    OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE                26,176,706   19,901,642   23,268,248   19,406,665


    ADD ADDITIONAL DILUTIVE SHARES ISSUABLE
    ASSUMING CONVERSION OF SERIES B, G, J,
    K, L, M & N PREFERRED STOCK INTO COMMON
    STOCK (1)                                              0           0            0            0
                                                  ----------  ----------   ----------   ----------
TENTATIVE NUMBER OF SHARES FOR COMPUTION
    OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE           26,176,706  19,901,642   23,268,248   19,406,665
                                                  ----------  ----------   ----------   ----------
                                                  ----------  ----------   ----------   ----------
LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK FOR
    PURPOSES OF COMPUTING PRIMARY EARNINGS
    PER SHARE                                       (483,500)  ($235,000) ($1,426,200)   ($263,600)
    ADD PROVISION FOR PREFERRED DIVIDENDS
      RELATING TO CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK              0           0            0            0
                                                   ---------   ---------   ----------   ----------
NET EARNINGS FOR COMPUTATION OF FULLY
    DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE                     ($483,500)  ($235,000) ($1,426,200)   ($263,600)
                                                  ----------  ----------   ----------   ----------
                                                  ----------  ----------   ----------   ----------
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - PRIMARY,
    INCLUDING COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS                ($0.02)     ($0.01)      ($0.06)      ($0.01)
                                                  ----------  ----------   ----------   ----------
                                                  ----------  ----------   ----------   ----------

</TABLE>


                                           -13-
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-3 (Nos. 333-119198, 333-131876, 333-121004, 333-122433, 333-109511 and
      333-122693) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-113889)
      of
      our report relating to the consolidated financial statements of Apollo Gold
      Corporation dated March 29, 2007, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
      of Apollo Gold Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006.




/s/
                DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPIndependent
                Registered Chartered AccountantsVancouver,
                Canada
                March
                  30, 2007
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.2


                                                                 July 13, 2001


     The Management Agreement dated as of January 1, 2001 by and between
Forever Enterprises, Inc. and National Cemetery Management Company, is hereby
declared void ab initio.



                                     FOREVER ENTERPRISES, INC.


                              By:    /s/ Brent D. Cassity
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                     Brent D. Cassity, Chief Executive Officer



                                     NATIONAL CEMETERY MANAGEMENT COMPANY


                              By:    /s/ Randall K. Sutton
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                     Randall K. Sutton, Vice President
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 278

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to permit Members,

in specified circumstances, to vote by secure electronic device from their

districts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 15, 1993

Mr. KASICH (for himself, Mrs. SCHROEDER, Mr. CONDIT, Mr. CRAPO, Mr.

LIGHTFOOT, Mr. HALL of Ohio, Ms. WATERS, Mr. RAVENEL, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. DE LUGO, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. FILNER, Mr.

KINGSTON, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. ORTIZ, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, and Mr. LIPINSKI) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

permit Members, in specified circumstances, to vote by

secure electronic device from their districts.

1 Resolved, (a) That rule I of the Rules of the House

2 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the

3 following new clause:

4 ‘‘13.(a) He shall devise and implement a system sub5 ject to his direction and control to allow each Member to

6 vote in the House and in the Committee of the Whole

7 using a secure, electronic device from a location (which
2

•HRES 278 IH

1 the Speaker shall approve) within that Member’s congres2 sional district if the Member notifies the Speaker that any

3 of the following circumstances exist—

4 ‘‘(1) the Member is seriously ill;

5 ‘‘(2) the Member’s spouse, child, or stepchild is

6 seriously ill;

7 ‘‘(3) a child has been born to the Member or

8 the Member’s spouse within the past 2 weeks;

9 ‘‘(4) the Member’s spouse, child, stepchild, par10 ent, or sibling has died within the past 2 weeks; or

11 ‘‘(5) a natural disaster as declared by the Presi12 dent or the Governor has occurred within the Mem13 ber’s district within the past 2 weeks;

14 and that Member obtains the prior written approval of the

15 Speaker.

16 ‘‘(b) As used in this clause, the term ‘seriously ill’

17 has the same meaning as the term serious health condition

18 (except a mental condition) as defined in section 101 of

19 the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993.’’.

20 (b) The Committee on Rules is authorized and di21 rected to report any amendments to the Rules of the

22 House of Representatives by September 21, 1994, nec23 essary to effectuate clause 13 of rule I.

Æ
#### In the Interest of P. G. and G. G., Minors.

No. 73-47.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 3, 1973.

Rehearing Denied July 30, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and John Lipinski, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Sr., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants, who are minors, urge the insufficiency of the evidence to support the finding that they are delinquent because of their violation of Fla.Stat. § 877.11, F.S.A. (inhalation or possession of harmful chemical substances). Basically, the appellants argue that a finding of delinquency upon a charge of the violation of this statute requires a chemical analysis of the alleged “harmful chemical substance.” We think that because of the evidence in the record of the intoxication of the minors, their conduct in fleeing the scene, and the testimony of the police officer as to her experience in dealing with this particular harmful chemical substance which is generally known to be sometimes used by juveniles for the purpose of intoxication, a chemical analysis was not essential to the proof of the charge. Cf. Koenig v. State, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 627.

Affirmed.
H. Res. 283

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

October 27, 1993.

Resolved, That all points of order against the conference

report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2492) making appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and

other activities chargeable in whole or in part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September

30, 1994, and for other purposes, are waived. The motions

printed in the joint explanatory statement of the committee

of conference to dispose of amendments in disagreement shall

be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### SAM SENTER FARMS and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Petitioners, v. John A. SHORT and the Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 43359.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 6, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Mark S. Hauf, certify that:
1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MetromediaInternational Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this quarterly report; and 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report. 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:
*a)* designed such disclosure control and procedures orcaused such disclosure controls and procedure to be designedunder our supervision to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared; *b)* evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisquarterly report, our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and *c)* disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the period covered by this quarterly report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
*a)* all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and *b)* any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: August 23, 2004    /s/ MARK S. HAUF   *President, Chief Executive Officer* *and Chairman of the Board* *(Principal Executive Officer)*
#### Charles L. BANKSTON v. STATE.

3 Div. 732.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 16, 1978.

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED AND REMANDED on authority of the opinion of the Supreme Court SC 2693, dated April 7, 1978, 358 So.2d 1040.

All the Judges concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,310,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,594,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                   208,000
<INVENTORY>                                    834,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,193,200
<PP&E>                                       4,798,300
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,502,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,097,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,302,600
<BONDS>                                      9,659,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,811,500
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,951,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,097,500
<SALES>                                      1,278,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,278,700
<CGS>                                          951,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  951,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               356,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (97,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (97,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (97,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>