*HomeU.S. Government Accountability Office*
Menu

      close


          
          
                          	
				
				
	
	
					Reports & Testimonies
									
																				
				
				
	
	
								Reports & Testimonies
													
																												
																						
							
																Recommendations Database
							
																												
																						
							
																Month in Review
							
																												
																						
							
																Order Copies
							
																												
																						
							
																Restricted Reports
							
																												
																						
							
																View Topics
							
																												
																						
							
																View Agencies
							
																												
																						
							
																Bid Protests & Appropriations Law
									
																				
				
				
	
	
								Bid Protests & Appropriations Law
													
																												
																						
							
																Bid Protests
							
																												
																						
							
																Appropriations Law
							
																												
																						
							
																Federal Vacancies Reform Act
							
																												
																						
							
																Other Legal
							
																												
																						
							
																About
									
																				
				
				
	
	
								About
													
																												
																						
							
																What GAO Does
							
																												
																						
							
																U.S. Comptroller General
							
																												
																						
							
																Careers
							
																												
																						
							
																Contact UsFor Congress
                                
                          
        
                Press Center
                                
                          
        
                Careers
                                
                          
        
                BlogSearch Breadcrumb
        Home
                            Reports & Testimonies
                            Department of Homeland SecurityꟷLegality of Service of Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and Service of Senior Official Performing The Duties of Deputy Secretary of Homeland SecurityꟷReconsideration
    Department of Homeland SecurityꟷLegality of Service of Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and Service of Senior Official Performing the Duties of Deputy Secretary of Homeland SecurityꟷReconsideration **B-332451**
        Aug 21, 2020Jump To:
    Jump ToElder Abuse
          Services for Older Adults
          State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends
          State and Local Fiscal Projections
          Federal Borrowing
          Managing the Debt
          Summary of Funding Provisions
          Auditing the Government's Books
          Unpacking the Financial Report
          Highlights
          Recommendations
          Background
          About This Work
          About This Work
          Trends
          About the Center
          Why It's High Risk
          What Remains To Be Done
          Key Reports
          Newest COVID-Related Reports
          AI Use Cases
          Flood Insurance
          Past Pandemic-Related Reports
          CARES Act Oversight Reports
          All COVID-19 Reports
          Report Suspected Fraud
          Subjects
          How to Get Notified
          Past Reports
          Public Health Threats
          Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds
          Lessons Learned
          Agency Reports
          Recent Reports
          Recommendations
          Supplemental Material
          Full Report
          Additional Data
          View Decision
          Downloads
          Previously Identified Actions
          Related Pages
          Associated Agencies
          Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead
          Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas
          Retirement Security Key Areas
          Current List
          About The High Risk List
          Area Ratings
          Previous High Risk Products
          Search Federal Vacancies
          Past Federal Vacancies
          Violation Letters
          About the Yellow Book
          Advisory Council
          Related Resources
          Comment Letters
          Related Publications
          Contacts and Resources
          Major Issues Facing the Nation
          Meeting Strategic Challenges
          Additional Resources
          Resources
          GAO Contacts
          Mission Teams
          Operations and Staff Offices
          Organization Chart
          Why a Career at GAO?
          Am I Qualified?
          Company Culture
          Reasonable Accommodations
          Video Gallery
          Paid Internships
          Student Volunteers
          Professional Development Program
          Advancement
          Executive Candidate Program
          Summer Associates
          Externships
          Benefits
          Contacts
                    Skip to Highlights
Highlights
  The Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) request that we rescind our August 14, 2020, decision is denied, as DHS has not shown that our decision contains either material errors of fact or law, nor has DHS provided information not previously considered that warrants reversal or modification of the decision.

  View Decision**Decision**

**Matter of:**Department of Homeland Security--Legality of Service of Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and Service of Senior Official Performing the Duties of Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security--Reconsideration

**File:**B-332451

**Date:**August 21, 2020

**DIGEST**

The Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) request that we rescind our August 14, 2020, decision is denied, as DHS has not shown that our decision contains either material errors of fact or law, nor has DHS provided information not previously considered that warrants reversal or modification of the decision.

**DECISION**

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) requests reconsideration of our decision in Department of Homeland SecurityꟷLegality of Service of Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and Service of Senior Official Performing the Duties of Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security, B-331650, August 14, 2020 (Decision), asking that we rescind the decision.  Letter from Senior Official Performing the Duties of the General Counsel to General Counsel, GAO (Aug. 17, 2020).  In our decision, we concluded that the appointments of both officials were issued under an invalid order of succession.  GAO will modify or reverse a prior decision only if it contains a material error of fact or law.  GAO, *Procedures and Practices for Legal Decisions and Opinions*, GAO-06-1064SP (Washington, D.C.: Sept. 2006), *available at* https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-06-1064SP.  As explained below, DHS did not identify any material errors of fact or law and we decline to reverse or modify the decision.

BACKGROUND

The Homeland Security Act (HSA) provides a means for an official to assume the title of Acting Secretary pursuant to a designation of further order of succession by the Secretary.  6 U.S.C. § 113(g)(2).  Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen exercised this power on April 9, 2019, the day before her resignation, when she established a new order of succession for Acting Secretary as reflected in DHS 00106 (April Delegation).[1]  However, upon her resignation, the official who assumed the title of Acting SecretaryꟷMr. Kevin McAleenanꟷwas not the official designated in the April Delegation order of succession to serve upon the Secretary’s resignation.  As a result, we concluded Mr. McAleenan’s subsequent amendments to the April Delegation order of succession were invalid and the subsequent appointments of Chad Wolf and Kenneth Cuccinelli who assumed their positions under such amendments were also improper.

While we concluded the appointments were improper, we did not review or make conclusions regarding the consequences of actions taken by these officials.  We referred this question to the DHS Office of Inspector General.  In that regard, we specifically suggested consideration of whether actions taken by these officials could be ratified by properly serving individuals as designated in the April Delegation to be the Acting Secretary and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Deputy Secretary.

DECISION

In its August 17, 2020, letter, DHS asserts that our decision is “fundamentally erroneous,” but in doing so did not point to any facts which we relied upon that were in error or provide any new facts for us to consider.  DHS does assert legal error, arguing that our decision failed to properly defer to its interpretation of the Memorandum which it relied upon to demonstrate that the Secretary designated Mr. McAleenan to serve as Acting Secretary. The memorandum to which DHS refers is the April 9, 2019 Memorandum to Secretary Nielsen from the then-General Counsel requesting the Secretary’s approval of the revised order of succession for Annex A.  DHS letter, at 5-6.

In our decision, we addressed DHS’s focus on the Memorandum.  Decision, at 8-9.  DHS argues that the Memorandum introduces ambiguity and that this requires us to defer to its interpretation of the order of succession.  However, given that the plain language of the April Delegation is clear, there is no need to refer to the Memorandum.  Any contrary interpretation of the April Delegation by DHS would not be entitled to any deference given its clarity.  An agency’s interpretation is not entitled to deference unless the controlling language is ambiguous, nor is deference available to an agency’s “*post hoc* rationalization advanced [to] defend past agency action.”  *See, generally*, *Kisor v. Wilkie*, 139 S. Ct. 2400, 2415, 2417 (2019) (a court should not afford deference unless the regulation is genuinely ambiguous).

In addition to its insistence on deference, DHS accused this office of political partisanship.  In our oversight role, GAO produces hundreds of written products annually, including legal decisions, that examine agency programs and operations throughout the government.  DHS’s demand for deference in these circumstances is not only legally unsupported but also ignores the public and Constitutional imperative of oversight to ensure transparency and accountability of governmental actions.

Our August 14, 2020, decision and all of our written products represent the work of numerous professionals, each taking care to remain independent and mindful of GAO’s obligation to provide nonpartisan service to the American people. All GAO products also undergo a multi-level review to assure they are intellectually sound and free from bias. Rather than trying to reach a particular conclusion, our legal decisions, this one included, are the result of a dispassionate application of the relevant law to facts, not advocacy, and are subject to rigorous legal review and signature of GAO’s General Counsel.

CONCLUSION

GAO will modify or reverse a prior decision or opinion only if it contains a material error of fact or law.  DHS has not demonstrated that our prior decision contains errors of either fact or law, nor has DHS presented information not previously considered that warrants reversal or modification of our decision.  Therefore, we decline to reverse or modify the decision.

Thomas H. Armstrong's signature

Thomas H. Armstrong
General Counsel

[1] The Secretary also changed the order of succession for Deputy Secretary pursuant to her general management authorities under 6 U.S.C. § 112.

Downloads
    Full Report (3 pages)
GAO Contacts
    
      Shirley A. Jones
            
            Managing Associate General Counsel
      
            jonessa@gao.gov
      
            (202) 512-5400
Office of Public Affairs
    
      Chuck Young
            
            Managing Director
      
            youngc1@gao.gov
      
            (202) 512-4800
Related Pages
      RelatedAppropriations LawRelatedBid ProtestsRelatedDecisions & FAQsRelatedThe Red BookRelatedContract Appeals BoardRelatedFederal Vacancies Reform ActRelatedCongressional Review Act
 Receive GAO Updates
  Stay informed as we add new reports & testimonies.

    GAO Logo
      U.S. Government Accountability Office


                                   Column 1
                            Press Center
                              Contact Us
                              Inspector General
                              Restricted Reports
                              Column 2
                            Copyright & Terms of Use
                              Privacy Policy
                              Accessibility
                              Sitemap
                              Column 3
                            FOIA Requests
                              Scam Alerts
                              No FEAR Act Data
                              Health Care Advisory Committees