alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.1

                                      II-5
                         AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT AND
                             PLAN OF REORGANIZATION

THIS AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION (the "Agreement") is
entered into as of this 18th day of July 2001, in accordance with the terms of
Section 7.11 of the Agreement, by and among United Management, Inc., a Nevada
corporation ("UM"), and RRUN Ventures Inc. ("RRUN"), a Nevada corporation.

WHEREAS, the parties entered into the Agreement as of December 18, 2000; and

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained
in the Agreement and herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending
to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:

1. Paragraph 3.3(b) and 3.4(b) shall be deleted in their entirety.

2. Paragraph 3.3 (a) shall be amended to read as follows:

"(a) It is specifically understood and agreed that options for the acquisition
of RRUN common shares issued under the RRUN Stock Option Plan prior to the
merger of RRUN and UM shall survive the merger and shall become options for the
purchase of UM common shares. By entering into this Agreement, UM elects to
assume such treatment of all RRUN options as set forth in subsection 7(m) of the
RRUN Stock Option Plan. The number of UM common shares an option holder shall be
entitled to purchase and the exercise price per share shall be as adjusted
pursuant to subsection 4(b) of the RRUN Stock Option Agreements."

3. Paragraph 2.2 shall be amended to read as follows:

"The authorized capitalization of UM consists of 100,000,000 shares of Common
Stock, par value $0.0001 per share. As of the date hereof there are 500,000
restricted Common Shares of UM issued and outstanding."

Other than as set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment to the agreement
and plan of reorganization as of the date set forth above.


United Management, Inc.                 RRUN Ventures Inc.


By: /s/ Christine Cerisse               By: /s/ Ray Hawkins
    ---------------------                   ---------------
    Christine Cerisse                       Ray Hawkins
    Its:  President                         Its:  President
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00844

- CV

In re Summer Benford

Q. W., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- FM

- 18

- 00 1770, TH E H ONORABLE DUSTIN M. H OWELL, JUDGE PRESIDI NG

O R D E R T O S H O W C A U S E

PER CURIAM

This is a contempt proceeding ancillary to the appeal of Q. W. The subject of this

proceeding is Summer Benford , appellant’s attorney.

Appellant filed h er notice of appeal on November 4, 2019 , and her brief was due

on December 23, 2019 . On January 14, 2020

, we ordered counsel to file appellant’s brief no

later than January 27, 2020 . To date, appellant’s brief h as not been filed.

Therefore, it is here by o rdered that Summer Benford shall appear in person before

this Court on Fri day, February 2 1 , 2020, at 11:00 a.m., in the Third Court of Appeals courtroom,

located on the first floor of the Price Daniel, Sr. Bui lding, 209 West 14th Street, in Austin, T ra vi s

County, Texas, to show cause why she should not be held in contempt and have sanctions2

imposed for her failure to obey our January 1 4, 2020 order. This order to show cause will be

withdrawn and Benford will be relieved of her obligation to appear be fo re this Cour t as ordered

above if the Clerk of this Court receives appellant’s brief on or before February 1 9 , 2020

.

It is ordered on February 10, 2020.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices B aker and Triana
#### Billy Wayne PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-717.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 6, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Q of Florida Public Utilities Company (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), we, John T. English, Chief Executive Officer and George M. Bachman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/John T. English

John T. English

Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2005





/s/George M. Bachman

George M. Bachman

Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2005
# Official Journal L 5/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 5 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 639 January 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 5

English edition

Legislation

Volume 639 January 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/10 of 7 January 2020 concerning certain interim protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in Poland
  (notified under document C(2020) 75)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/10 of 7 January 2020 concerning certain interim protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in Poland
  (notified under document C(2020) 75)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2020) 75)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 32.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Motors Corporation (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John M. Devine, Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.


                                     By:  /s/ JOHN M. DEVINE
                                     ---  ------------------
                                          John M. Devine
                                          Vice Chairman and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          November 9, 2005






































                                       47
<PAGE>
  <TABLE>
  
                                                                                       Exhibit 11
  
                                   GTE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
  
                               CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
  
  <CAPTION>
                                                     Three Months Ended           Nine Months Ended 
                                                        September 30                 September 30   
                                                     1997          1996          1997           1996
                                                                      (In Thousands)
  
  <S>                                              <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>   
  Net income                                        $756,308     $755,978     $2,092,182   $2,014,067
  
  Adjustments to net income:
  Add - Interest expense, net of tax
          effect, on employees' stock plans             -             900           -           1,713
  
  Adjusted net income                               $756,308     $756,878     $2,092,182   $2,015,780
  
  Average common shares                              955,980      965,498        957,563      970,574
  
  Adjustments to average common shares:
  Add - Employees' stock and stock option plans        2,211        4,617          2,109        3,994
  
  Adjusted average common shares                     958,191      970,115        959,672      974,568
  
  EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
     Primary (1)                                        $.79         $.78          $2.18        $2.07
  
     Fully diluted (2)                                  $.79         $.78          $2.18        $2.07
  
  
  (1)  Computed by dividing net income for the periods by the average common shares outstanding.  
       Common stock equivalents are excluded from this computation since they do not have a 3% 
       dilutive effect.
  
  (2)  Computed assuming the exercise of those stock plans and options that would have a dilutive 
       effect.
  
       (a)  Equivalent common shares to be added to average shares for the employees' stock 
            plans, stock ownership plans and stock options are computed according to the 
            "treasury stock" method.
  
       (b)  Net income for the periods is adjusted to reflect the increase in income for the 
            interest accrued, net of tax effect, on funds received from installments under the 
            employees' stock plan.
  
  </TABLE>
Page 1 of 1

1435-S June 1, 2016 thru May 31, 2017 (2021)

-------- ---------------------------------- ------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

ITEM Basis of

NUMBER ITEM DESCRIPTION AWARD UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST

-------- ---------------------------------- ------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

I. COMPLETE PRODUCT:

 (a) Template "A" or "B" printed face only, 42 35.00 1,470.00 15.00 630.00 26.75 1,123.50 15.95 669.90 50.00 2,100.00 29.00 1,218.00 21.05 884.10

Each name...for 250 cards...

 (b) Template "A" or "B" printed face and back, 235 35.00 8,225.00 19.00 4,465.00 28.05 6,591.75 19.75 4,641.25 50.00 11,750.00 49.00 11,515.00 26.90 6,321.50

Each name...for 250 cards...

 (c) Template "C" printed face only, 62 55.00 3,410.00 25.00 1,550.00 39.50 2,449.00 35.00 2,170.00 50.00 3,100.00 59.00 3,658.00 40.14 2,488.68

Each name...for 250 cards...

 (d) Template "C" printed face and back 354 55.00 19,470.00 30.00 10,620.00 42.50 15,045.00 38.80 13,735.20 50.00 17,700.00 79.00 27,966.00 49.43 17,498.22

Each name...for 250 cards...

-------- ---------------------------------- ------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

TOTAL 32,575.00 17,265.00 25,209.25 21,216.35 34,650.00 44,357.00 27,192.50

DISCOUNT 0.00% 0.00 1.00% 172.65 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.25% 86.63 1.00% 443.57 0.00% 0.00

NET TOTAL 32,575.00 17,092.35 25,209.25 21,216.35 34,563.37 43,913.43 27,192.50

St. Louis, MO

Taylor/Tatex

Waco, TX

The Print House

Brooklyn, NY

WBC Inc., DBA Lithexcel

Albuquerque, NM

AWARDED

GPO

Estimate

Business Card Inc.

Tullahoma, TN

Lopez Printing

San Antonio, TX

Shamrock Raisdletter 

&Printing
261 La. 1065

#### Mrs. Ardell Hunt KINNAIRD v. Newton Amon KINNAIRD.

No. 52487.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 1972.

In re: Newton Amon Kinnaird applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Morehouse. 260 So.2d 802.

Writ denied. No error of law. See Vignes v. Vignes, La.App., 236 So.2d 582 (1970), certiorari denied 256 La. 865, 239 So.2d 362 (1970).

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. Applicant has followed precisely the requirements of the C.C.P., which should be amended to conform to the ruling involved.
#### Ersell L. MASON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-607.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 17, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Gertrude THOMPSON et al., Petitioners, v. Dorothy E. WILLIAMS, Respondent.

No. 41912.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 14, 1973.

Cause dismissed.
#### Osben JONES, Jr., et al. v. Donald PELTIER et al.

No. 62650.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Osben Jones, Jr., et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the *1216Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Lafourche.

Writ denied.
Exhibit 10.30





 EXHIBIT 10.30

September 15, 2000


 

To:            Bernie Demko

From:        Mike Cheshire

Subject:     Appointment as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Gerber Technology


Copy:        Fred Rosen

                
Becket McNab

               
 Personnel File


Congratulations on your promotion to the position of Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer of Gerber Technology, reporting to Fred Rosen.


Compensation

This promotion is effective September 22, and the compensation increase will be made retroactive to that date.  Effective September 22 your base salary will be increased to $215,000 per year.  Your bonus target will remain at 50%, however,
recognizing that you have been asked to come in at a difficult time, for FY 2001 your bonus payment will be guaranteed to be at least 50% of target.  This guarantee applies to you only and to FY 2001 only.


I will ask the Management Development and Compensation Committee of Gerber's Board of Directors to consider an additional stock option award, and I am recommending an award of 12,500 shares.  This will be discussed at their next regular meeting.  


Other Benefits 



	You will maintain your current company car, and continue to participate in the car program at the Corporate Vice President level.
	You will continue to be covered by your existing Change in Control agreement, and you will be given a Gerber Technology Change in Control agreement.
	You will be covered by the Gerber Scientific Executive Severance Policy at the Corporate Vice President level.  




While, as the Executive Vice President of Gerber Technology, you are no longer an Officer of Gerber Scientific, Inc., I will ask that you continue to attend my regular Officer's meetings.  


Bernie, I am delighted that you have accepted this position, I am confident in your success, and look forward to working with you.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 772

To provide that annual pay adjustments for Members of Congress may not

exceed cost-of-living increases in benefits under title II of the Social

Security Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1993

Mr. GOSS (for himself, Mr. DREIER and Mr. SHAW) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To provide that annual pay adjustments for Members of

Congress may not exceed cost-of-living increases in benefits under title II of the Social Security Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act

4 of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31) is amended by adding at the end

5 the following:

6 ‘‘(3)(A) Notwithstanding any other provision of this

7 subsection, rates of pay for positions referred to in para8 graph (1) may not be increased, under paragraph (2), in
2

•HR 772 IH

1 excess of the maximum percentage increase allowable in

2 any year.

3 ‘‘(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A), the maxi4 mum percentage increase allowable under paragraph (2)

5 in any year is the percentage equal to the percentage by

6 which benefits under title II of the Social Security Act

7 were increased during the 1–year period preceding the

8 start of the calendar year involved, either under section

9 215(i) of such Act or pursuant to a law providing a gen10 eral benefit increase under such title.’’.

Æ
#### THE STATE *vs.*PHILIP REDDEN, (Negro.)

The indictment was for selling liquor contrary to law.

The proof was that the defendant had liquor at a vendue, locked up in a chest; that two persons went to his wagon, asked him for liquor and got it; that they afterwards came and got more, and that one of them gave him some money.

The defence denied that there was any sale of the liquor.

*The Court*

said the law prohibited the sale of any kind of spirituous liquor by the small; or of any mixed liquor whatever. The law pointed at the fact, and did not regard the mode or manner of sale. No device of striped pig, or other contrivance which ingenuity has resorted to in order to circumvent the law will avail, if the main fact be proved; if in fact the transaction amount to a purchase and sale of liquor. In Kent county an ingenious but worthless woman set up a stall to give away liquor, and sell segars at a price which would compensate for the liquor; in that case it was left to the jury to say whether it was in the contemplation of the parties by the purchaie of segars to pay for the liquor; and the jury convicted the defendant of a violation of this law.

Nevertheless there must be a sale. The law does not prohibit a a gift of liquor, and the jury must be satisfied by the evidence that in this case the money given to the defendant by Parker, was in compensation or pay for liquor which he and Jackson drank. If the proof fail on this subject, the verdict should be not guilty ; if the money was given and accepted in the whole or part for this liquor, the covering the matter up by any device will not avail, and the defendant ought to be convicted.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CORA SUE SANCHEZ, Individually and as 

Representative of the Estate of ANTHONY 

TONY SANCHEZ, Deceased, JENNIFER 

PASOWICZ and JULIE MARIE SANCHEZ,

Appellants,

v.

NAVISTAR, INC., SHIELD RESTRAINT 

SYSTEMS, INC. f/k/a AMSAFE 

COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS, INC. and

AMSAFE, INC.,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00255-CV

Appeal from the

112th Judicial District Court

of Upton County, Texas

(TC#19-07-U4751-IDM)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the joint motion to dismiss and enter judgment, and 

grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. We vacate the judgment of the trial court without 

consideration of the merits and remand the case to the trial court for dismissal of the cause with 

prejudice in accordance with the parties’ agreement. We further order each party to bear their own 

costs of appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Form 10-Q
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such condensed consolidated
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          58,276
<SECURITIES>                                    54,929
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,641
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,615
<PP&E>                                          14,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,859
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,979
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,445
<SALES>                                         64,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,369
<CGS>                                            2,478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  42
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,772
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,711
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,061
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62


</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Nos. 1D18-3465

1D18-3469

1D18-3471

1D18-3473

1D18-3475

1D18-3477

1D18-3478

1D18-3479

1D18-3481

1D18-3482

1D18-3483

_____________________________

JOHN MARSHALL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Robert E. Long, Jr., Judge.

August 8, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, John Marshall, appeals the trial court’s failure to 

render a written order finding him competent to proceed after 
2

pronouncing Appellant competent to proceed at the conclusion of 

his competency hearing.1 The State properly concedes error. 

We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to render 

a written order adjudicating Appellant competent to proceed, 

nunc pro tunc, consistent with its oral findings. See Merriell v. 

State, 169 So. 3d 1287, 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, EDWARDS, and EISNAUGLE, Associate Judges, concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Kevin Alvarez, of Law Office of Kevin Alvarez P.A., Tallahassee, 

for Appellant

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Quentin 

Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee.

 1 Appellant does not argue that the trial court failed to make 

an independent competency determination.