alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 146 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 146

   Objection to any further increase in the inland waterway fuel tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 1993

Mr. Tauzin (for himself, Mr. Fields of Texas, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Manton, 
Mr. Bateman, Mr. Coble, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. Laughlin, 
    Mr. Volkmer, Mr. Rahall, Mr. Tanner, Mr. Barlow, Mr. Hayes, Mr. 
Peterson of Minnesota, Mr. King, Mr. Talent, Mr. Grandy, Mrs. Bentley, 
   Mr. Hamilton, and Mr. Baker of Louisiana) submitted the following 
    resolution which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Objection to any further increase in the inland waterway fuel tax.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the inland waterway fuel tax should not be increased 
        beyond those increases that are scheduled under current law; 
        and
            (2) the recently passed H. Con. Res. 64 (setting forth the 
        budget of the United States Government for fiscal year 1994 
        through 1998) should not be considered to assume any increase 
        in the inland waterway fuel tax beyond the scheduled increases 
        referred to in paragraph (1).

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<CIK> 0000077227
<NAME> PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,395,828
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     83,845
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         203,835
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,132,612
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,816,120
<COMMON>                                       105,812
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      285,486
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            104,449    <F1>
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 495,747
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          100,000    <F2>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           424,595
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       13
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      2,268
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                18,293
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,775,204
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                3,816,120
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      705,955
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            37,808
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     546,691
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     584,499
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        121,456
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              21,347
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 142,803
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        34,853    <F3>
<NET-INCOME>                                   107,950
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        154
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  107,070    <F4>
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       380,000    <F5>
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       37,131
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         (99,275)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME OF $9,726.
<F2> REPRESENTS TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $100,000.
<F3> INCLUDES AMOUNT FOR COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
<F3> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $4,977 AND TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES
<F3> OF $2,141.
<F4> INCLUDES LOSS ON PREFERRED STOCK REACQUSITION OF $726.
<F5> REPRESENTS COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS PAID TO PARENT CORPORATION.
</FN>


</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 876

To prevent States from reducing unemployment compensation benefits by

certain remuneration for services in the military reserves.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. MURPHY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To prevent States from reducing unemployment compensation benefits by certain remuneration for services in the

military reserves.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION NOT TO BE

4 REDUCED BY CERTAIN AMOUNTS OF COM5 PENSATION FOR SERVICES IN MILITARY RE6 SERVES.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 3304 of

8 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to approval

9 of State laws) is amended by redesignating paragraph

10 (18) as paragraph (19), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of
2

•HR 876 IH

1 paragraph (17), and by inserting after paragraph (17) the

2 following new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(18) except as provided in paragraph (15),

4 compensation shall not be denied or reduced by rea5 son of remuneration paid for services performed as

6 a member of a reserve component (as defined in sec7 tion 101(24) of title 37, United States Code) to the

8 extent such remuneration paid during any calendar

9 month does not exceed $300; and’’.

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—

11 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by

12 subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 1994.

13 (2) SPECIAL RULE.—In the case of any State

14 the legislature of which has not been in session for

15 at least 30 calendar days (whether or not successive)

16 between the date of the enactment of this Act and

17 January 1, 1994, the amendment made by sub18 section (a) shall take effect 30 calendar days after

19 the 1st day on which such legislature is in session

20 on or after January 1, 1994.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 99.13**

 

**CONSENT OF PACIFICO CORPUZ**

 

March 20, 2012

 

Brigus Gold Corp.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

 

**Re: Brigus Gold Corp.**

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

I hereby consent to (i) the use of my name in connection withthe following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F forthe year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 40-F”) of Brigus Gold Corp. (the “Company”) to which this consentrelates: (A) the technical report entitled “Black Fox Project National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report” dated January6, 2011 (the “Report”), (B) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2011 and (C)the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2011, (ii) the inclusion or incorporationby reference of information derived from the Report in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-113889, 333-162558and 333-167757), as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and ExchangeCommission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, orto any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporatedby reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.

 

Sincerely,
Motion Granted; Abatement Order filed December 11, 2014
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 14
- 00706
- CV

____________ ANGLO
- DUTCH PETROLEUM INTE RNATIONAL, INC., AND ANGLO
DUTCH (TENGE), LLC , Appellant s/Cross
- Appellees

V. GREENBER G PEDEN, P.C., AND G ERALD J. SWONKE ,

Appellee s/Cross
- Appellants
On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2004
- 20712



### ABATEMENT ORDER

Both the Anglo

- Dutch parties and the Greenberg parties are appealing from a fi nal judgment signed May 13, 2014. On December 8, 2014, the parties filed a joint motion for an extension of time to file their opening briefs, or alternatively, a request that the appeal be abated to permit the parties to pursue settlement discussions. We GRANT the alternative relief, vacate the current briefingschedule, and order the appeal ABATED until January 30, 2015
.

The appeal is abated , treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket until January 30, 2015. The appeal will be reinstated on our active docket at that time, and the parties’ opening briefs will be due January 30, 2015. If the parties reach a settlement agreement, the parties shall advise the court of the settlement as soon as practicable, and the appeal will be rei nstated when the parties file a motion to dismiss the appeal or other dispositive motion. The court will also consider a motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.

PER CURIAM

Panel cons ists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and McCally.
#### C. D. NORRIS, Jr. v. George G. SEIBELS et al.

Civ. 1013.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

Jan. 11, 1978.

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

In conformance with the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama dated December 9, 1977, 353 So.2d 1165, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Albama, of August 2, 1976, is reversed and this case is remanded to that court for further proceedings therein.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BRADLEY and HOLMES, JJ, concur.
Page 1 of 2North Dakota Regional HazeEPA-R08-OAR-2010-0406BoilersEquipped with SNCR andthat are ControllingNOxto under 0.17 lb/MMBtu(from 2010 annual Title IV data)STATE FACILITY_NAMEUniqueIDOP_YEAR NOX_RATE OWNERUNIT TYPEPRIMARYFUELNOX_CONTROL_INFOCAPACITYMMBtu/hrMASalem Harbor1626_120100.158Dominion EnergySalem Harbor, LLC(Owner/Operator)Dry bottomwall-firedboilerBitSelective Non-catalyticReduction Low NOx BurnerTechnology (Dry Bottom only)954MASalem Harbor1626_220100.1634Dominion EnergySalem Harbor, LLC(Owner/Operator)Dry bottomwall-firedboilerBitSelective Non-catalyticReduction Low NOx BurnerTechnology (Dry Bottom only)966MASomerset1613_820100.1263Somerset Power, LLC(Owner/Operator)Tangentially-firedBitSelective Non-catalyticReduction CombustionModification/Fuel Reburning1186MNTaconiteHarbor EnergyCenter10075_120100.1393Minnesota Power,Inc.(Owner/Operator)Tangentially-firedSubOverfire Air Selective Non-catalytic Reduction745MNTaconiteHarbor EnergyCenter10075_220100.1458Minnesota Power,Inc.(Owner/Operator)Tangentially-firedSubOverfire Air Selective Non-catalytic Reduction745TXBig Brown3497_120100.1376Big Brown PowerCompany LLC (Owner)Luminant GenerationCompany LLC(Operator)Tangentially-firedLigniteLow NOx Burner Technology w/Separated OFA Selective Noncatalytic Reduction7901Page 2 of 2BoilersEquipped with SNCR andthat are ControllingNOxto under 0.17 lb/MMBtu(from 2010 annual Title IV data)STATE FACILITY_NAMEUniqueIDOP_YEAR NOX_RATE OWNERUNIT TYPEPRIMARYFUELNOX_CONTROL_INFOCAPACITYMMBtu/hrTXBig Brown3497_220100.1437Big Brown PowerCompany LLC (Owner)Luminant GenerationCompany LLC(Operator)Tangentially-firedLigniteLow NOx Burner Technology w/Separated OFA Selective Noncatalytic Reduction8132TXMonticello6147_120100.1294LuminantGenerationCompany LLC(Owner/Operator)Tangentially-firedLigniteLow NOx Burner Technology w/Separated OFA Selective Noncatalytic Reduction7382TXMonticello6147_220100.1315Luminant GenerationCompany LLC(Owner/Operator)Tangentially-firedLigniteLow NOx Burner Technology w/Separated OFA Selective Noncatalytic Reduction7055WIEdgewater(4050)4050_420100.1464Wisconsin PublicService Corporation(Owner) WisconsinPower & LightCompany(Owner/Operator)CycloneboilerSubOverfireAir Other SelectiveNon-catalytic Reduction4629Note: Facilities listed in red italics are referenced as examples in EPA’s final rule for North Dakotaregional haze.
#### Sylvester McAFEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-33.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 21, 1972.

*76Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

MANN, Judge.

McAfee contends that he was convicted of assault with intent to commit murder in the second degree on insufficient evidence because he was barefooted when he kicked Police Officer Gaddis in the face. This argument is fallacious. McAfee was part of a crowd, some of whom were objecting to Officer Gaddis’ efforts, with his partner, Officer Lewis, to stop a fight between two men. Somebody shouted, “Kill the pig.” Another said, “Get his gun and kill the m-f-” Another man or men had beaten Gaddis badly, causing him to fall on the hood of a car, and later in the gutter. McAfee’s kick rendered him unconscious.

This was a mob, and all of the active participants were guilty of the crime. State v. Roby, Fla.1971, 246 So.2d 566. A jury was justified in believing that the intent behind the assault was to kill.

Affirmed.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES, J., concur.
# Official Journal L 217/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.217.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 217 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5514 August 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.217.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 217

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5514 August 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2012/462/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 23 July 2012 amending Decisions 2002/731/EC, 2002/732/EC, 2002/733/EC, 2002/735/EC and 2006/66/EC and repealing Decision 2002/730/EC concerning technical specifications for interoperability
  (notified under document C(2012) 4982)

   (1) | 1 |
| | | 2012/463/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 23 July 2012 amending Decisions 2006/679/EC and 2006/860/EC concerning technical specifications for interoperability
  (notified under document C(2012) 4984)

   (1) | 11 |
| | | 2012/464/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 23 July 2012 amending Decisions 2006/861/EC, 2008/163/EC, 2008/164/EC, 2008/217/EC, 2008/231/EC, 2008/232/EC, 2008/284/EC, 2011/229/EU, 2011/274/EU, 2011/275/EU, 2011/291/EU and 2011/314/EU concerning technical specifications for interoperability
  (notified under document C(2012) 4985)

   (1) | 20 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2012/462/EU

*

Commission Decision of 23 July 2012 amending Decisions 2002/731/EC, 2002/732/EC, 2002/733/EC, 2002/735/EC and 2006/66/EC and repealing Decision 2002/730/EC concerning technical specifications for interoperability
  (notified under document C(2012) 4982)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2012) 4982)

1

2012/463/EU

*

Commission Decision of 23 July 2012 amending Decisions 2006/679/EC and 2006/860/EC concerning technical specifications for interoperability
  (notified under document C(2012) 4984)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2012) 4984)

11

2012/464/EU

*

Commission Decision of 23 July 2012 amending Decisions 2006/861/EC, 2008/163/EC, 2008/164/EC, 2008/217/EC, 2008/231/EC, 2008/232/EC, 2008/284/EC, 2011/229/EU, 2011/274/EU, 2011/275/EU, 2011/291/EU and 2011/314/EU concerning technical specifications for interoperability
  (notified under document C(2012) 4985)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2012) 4985)

20

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
JACKET: 561-233

Title: PADDLE TIP REFLECTOR KIT

AGENCY: DHS / U.S. COAST GUARD

BID OPENING: August 30, 2018 2:00 P.M. MST

Contractor Name Quantity Terms

*Taylor/Navitor Label Works 153,000.00 2% - 20 Days

*AWARDED CONTRACTOR
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                  8,427 
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                             880
<ALLOWANCES>                                0  
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS><F1>                        0
<PP&E>                                288,478
<DEPRECIATION>                         42,782           
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        300,887      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES><F1>                   0
<BONDS>                               133,568      
<COMMON>                                  145 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                            106,617           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          300,887      
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       39,152     
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          30,931     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        1,419
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     12,555    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         6,819    
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     6,819    
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          (227)
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            6,592   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .70 
<FN>                                        
<F1> Mid-Atlantic Realty Trust (MART) is in the specialized real estate
<F1> industry for which the current/noncurrent distinction is deemed in
<F1> practice to have little or no relevance.  Therefore, MART prepares
<F1> unclassified balance sheets which do not report current assets or
<F1> current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 15





March 18, 1996


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Dear Sirs:

We are aware that the November 5, 1995 Quarterly Report on Form  10-Q of
General Host Corporation which includes our report dated December 5, 1995
(issued pursuant to the provisions of Statements on Auditing Standards No. 71
and 42), is incorporated by reference in its Registration Statement No.
33-50020 on Form S-8 filed on July 27, 1992.  We are also aware of our
responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.


Yours very truly,

Price Waterhouse LLP
Detroit, Michigan
H. Res. 103

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

February 24, 1993.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 920)

to extend the emergency unemployment compensation program, and for other purposes. The amendment recommended

by the Committee on Ways and Means printed in the bill and

the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on

Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as

adopted. All points of order against the bill, as amended, and

against its consideration are waived. Debate on the bill shall

not exceed two hours equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Ways and Means. The previous question shall be considered

as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without

intervening motion except one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Downey Financial Corp. ("Downey") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel D.
Rosenthal, Chief Executive Officer of Downey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Downey.



| | /s/ Daniel D.
  Rosenthal    
| | -----------------------------
| |                              
| | Date: February 29, 2008      
| | Chief Executive
      Officer
|

| | Page | Navigation Links
| | ---- | ----------------

Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Downey Financial Corp. ("Downey") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian E. Côté,
Chief Financial Officer of Downey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)    The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Downey.



| | /s/ Brian E. Côté      
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Date: February 29, 2008
| | Chief Financial Officer
|

| | Page | Navigation Links
| | ---- | ----------------
#### Joseph JENNINGS v. HALLIBURTON CO., Imco Drilling Mud, Inc. and Highlands Ins. Co.

No. 60206.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 1977.

In re: Joseph Jennings applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 346 So.2d 268.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the trial and appellate courts, the result is correct.