alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS INDUSTRIES, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF MARCH 31, 2000, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME,
CASH FLOWS AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,985
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,674
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,815
<INVENTORY>                                     17,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,609
<PP&E>                                         117,919
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,206
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,921
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,495
<SALES>                                         15,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,416
<CGS>                                           76,868
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   719
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (866)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (303)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (563)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (563)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
#### Rosalie CHANDLER, Petitioner, v. Myrtle PRIESTLEY d/b/a Priestley’s Sea Shells et al., Respondents.

No. 42321.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 11, 1972.

Order of April 11, 1972 affirmed and cause remanded to Industrial Relations Commission to re-enter order awarding attorney’s fees.

*48It is further ordered that the petition for attorney’s fees is hereby denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.

BOYD, J., dissents.
#### Lawrence Randall BAKER, a/k/a Charles Lewis, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. Q-116.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 11, 1972.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and William C. Owen, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23

SOCRATES TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants [LOGO]


We have issued our report dated December 15, 1998, accompanying the 
consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference or 
included in the Annual Report of Socrates Technologies Corporation, on Form 
10-K, for the year ended September 30, 1998. We hereby consent to the 
incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of 
Socrates Technologies Corporation, on Form S-8 (File No. 333-32395, effective 
July 30, 1997).



                                         GRANT THORNTON

Vienna, Virginia
December 15, 1998
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 21

               Socrates Technologies Corporation and Subsidiaries

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following lists all subsidiaries of Socrates Technologies Corporation as 
required by Exhibit 21.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
             Name                           State/Country of Incorporation
-----------------------------               -----------------------------------
<S>                                         <C>
1. MVS Modular Vision Systems, Inc.         Quebec, Canada

2. JMR Distributors, Inc.                   Virginia

3. Socrates Technologies, Inc.              Maryland

4. Expert, Inc.                             New York

5. Technet Computer Services, Inc.          Virginia
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortune Natural Resources Corporation
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Tyrone J. Fairbanks, Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.




                                  /s/ Tyrone J. Fairbanks
                                  ----------------------------------
                                  Tyrone J. Fairbanks
                                  Chief Financial Officer


Date:  November 14, 2002
#### Herman M. ROBBINS, Appellant, v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. R-160.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 16, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 1, 1973.

Alan R. Schwartz, Horton, Schwartz & Perse, and Beckman & McAliley, Miami, for appellant.

*441George D. Gabel, Jr., Toole, Taylor, Moseley, Gabel & Milton, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. Cloud v. Fallis (Fla.1959), 110 So.2d 669; Anchor Hocking Glass Corp. v. Allen (Fla.App.1964), 161 So.2d 853.

RAWLS, C. J., and WIGGINTON, J., and DREW, Associate. Judge, concur.
#### SAMUEL PETERSON *vs.*WILLIAM EDMONSON, MARY F. EDMONSON, SAMUEL G. CHANDLER, et al.

A tenant is not excused from the payment of rent by the destruction of the premises hy tempest, unless it be so stipulated.

The entry of the landlord to repair, for the tenant’s benefit, is not an eviction.

Replevin. Return : “ replevied, delivered and summoned.”— Pleas, non cepit, cognizance and avowry for rent arrear. Replication to avowry; non demisit; riens in arrear; entry and eviction by landlord.

The case was this. The plaintiff rented a house, &c., of defendant at a rent certain. The roof was torn off by a storm, and while the landlord was repairing it for the tenant, the whole fell down, and the tenant had to remove to an out-house. The tenant claimed an abatement of the rent, or an entire discharge from payment, on the ground of eviction. Eviction of a part, discharges the rent for the whole. (3 *Harr. Rep.,*366, *Graham*vs. *Anderson.)*

*Gray,*for plaintiffs.

*Bates,*for defendants.

*Mr. Bates,*contra,

cited 35 *Eng. Com. Law Rep.,*198 ; 1 Saund. *Rep.,*204; 1 *Cowp. Rep.,*242; 1 *Harr. Rep.,*520; 4 *Cowen Rep.,*581.)

*The Court*

charged:—That the defendants having avowed the taking of plaintiff’s goods, as a distress for rent arrear, must prove a leasing of the premises, and that there was rent in arrear.

2. That to excuse the payment of this rent on the ground of an eviction of the tenant by the landlord, the plaintiff must show that the defendant entered wrongfully and dispossessed the plaintiff of the premises.

8. The accidental destruction of a house under demise, is not an eviction, nor does it excuse the payment of the rent. It is a hardship, but it is the misfortune of the tenant during his term, as well as of the landlord after it. If no stipulation be made in the lease, to excuse the payment of rent in case of tempest or fire, the tenant is bound by his contract, and he is obliged to pay the rent. Nor could the act of the landlord, done at the tenant’s request, ip attempting lo repair.the premises after such an accident, for the more convenient and ‘comfortable occupation of the tenant, amount to an eviction. -

Verdict for defendants.
Factor File Layout

Ginnie II Pools -- One Record per Pool 

Item Data Item Begin End Type Length Remarks

1 Pool Number 1 6 Character 6 X(6)

2 Pool Indicator 7 7 Character 1 X

3 Issuer Number 8 11 Numeric 4 9(4)

4 Filler 12 12 Character 1 X

5 Issuer Name 13 72 Character 60 X(60)

6 Original Aggregate Amount 73 87 Numeric 15 9(13)v9(2)

7 Remaining Security RPB 88 102 Numeric 15 9(13)v9(2)

8 RPB Factor 103 111 Numeric 9 9(1)v9(8)

9 Pool Interest Rate 112 116 Numeric 5 9(2)v9(3)

10 Pool Type 117 118 Character 2 X(2)

11 Pool Issue Date (MMDDYY) 119 124 Numeric 6 9(6)

12 Pool Maturity Date (MMDDYY) 125 130 Numeric 6 9(6)

13 Factor Security Margin 131 134 Numeric 4 9(1)v9(3)

14 Interest Adjustment Date (MMDDYY) 135 140 Numeric 6 9(6)

15 Original Interest Rate 141 145 Numeric 5 9(2)v9(3)

16 Prospective Interest Rate 146 150 Numeric 5 9(2)v9(3)

17 Index Reference Date (MMDDYY) 151 156 Numeric 6 9(6)

18 Payment Adjustment Date (MMDDYY) 157 162 Numeric 6 9(6)

19 CUSIP Number 163 171 Character 9 X(9)

Length of Record 171
----

Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the Communication from the Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme Modern SME Policy for growth and employment

(2006/C 229/08)

THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS,

Having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme — Modern SME Policy for growth and employment, COM(2005) 551 final;

Having regard to the decision of the European Commission of 15 November 2005 to consult it on the subject, under the first paragraph of Article 265 of the Treaty establishing the European Community;

Having regard to the decision of its president of 24 January 2006 to instruct its Commission for Economic and Social Policy to draw up an opinion on this subject;

Having regard to its Opinion on the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (COM(2005) 121 final CdR 150/2005 fin) (1);

Having regard to its Opinion on the Integrated Guidelines for Growth and Jobs (2005-2008) (COM(2005) 141 final CdR 147/2005 fin) (2);

Having regard to its Own-initiative opinion of the Committee of the Regions on Competitiveness and Decentralisation (CdR 23/2005 fin) (3);

Having regard to its Draft Opinion CdR 40/2006 rev. 2 adopted on 6 April 2006 by its Commission for Economic and Social Policy (Rapporteur: Mrs Constance Hanniffy, Member of Offaly County Council, Cathaoirleach of the Midland Regional Authority and Member of the Border Midland and Western Regional Assembly, IE/EPP).

adopted the following opinion at its 65th plenary session, held on 14 and 15 June 2006 (meeting of 15 June)

1.   The Committee of the Regions' comments

Giving fresh impetus to SME policy

Promoting entrepreneurship and skills

Improving SMEs access to markets

Cutting red tape

Improving SMEs' growth potential

Strengthening dialogue and consultation with SME stakeholders

2.   The Committee of the Regions' recommendations

Promoting entrepreneurship and skills

Improving SMEs access to markets

Cutting red tape

Brussels, 15 June 2006.

The President

of the Committee of the Regions

Michel DELEBARRE

----

(1)  Not yet published in the Official Journal of the EC.

(2)  Not yet published in the Official Journal of the EC.

(3)  Not yet published in the Official Journal of the EC.

----
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 30884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14186]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 54


Universal Service

CFR Correction

0
 In Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 40 to 69, 
revised as of October 1, 2017, on page 206, in Sec.  54.507, the second 
paragraph (f) is removed.

[FR Doc. 2018-14186 Filed 6-29-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1301-00-D
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________
No. 99-30227 Summary Calendar

_____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
RENÉ ORTLIEB, III,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

(99-CR-31-ALL)

_________________________________________________________________ April 12, 1999

Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

René Ortlieb, III, appeals the district court’s pretrial

detention ord er, which, i nter alia

, overruled the magistrate

judge’s order setting bail at $200,000. Among other things,

Ortlieb contends that the Government failed to prove both that he

is a flight risk and that “no condition or combination of

conditions will reasona bly assure ... the safety of [other

persons]” if he is not detained prior to his trial. S ee 18 U.S.C.

§ 3142(e). (The Government’s application for leave to file a reply

memorandum in excess of 20 pages and the parties’ motions to

supplement the record are GRANTED .)- 2 -

The record supports the district court’s de termination that

t he Government proved by a preponderance of the evidence that

Ortlieb is a flight risk; and, inferentially, that there is no

condition, or combination of conditions, which woul d reasonably

assure his appearance at trial. (Accordingly, we need not address

whether the district court erred by finding that Ortlieb would be

a threat to others’ safety if released prior to trial, or whether

the district court applied the correct standard of proof. S ee

United States v. Hare , 873 F.2d 796, 799 (5th Cir. 1989).)

AFFIRMED
# Official Journal C 387A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 387A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6215 November 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 387A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6215 November 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | EUROFOUND |
| 2019/C 387 A/01 | Publication of a vacancy for the function of Executive Director in Dublin, Ireland (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2019/20046 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

EUROFOUND

2019/C 387 A/01

Publication of a vacancy for the function of Executive Director in Dublin, Ireland (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2019/20046

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Gerald Gentleman #1 Wet Scrubber

Given/Assumed Flow rate (acfm) Flue Gas Temperature (degrees F) Uncontrolled SO2 emissions (TPY) 24,893 2001 - 2003CAM data Absorber + $62,436,000 company report ductwork $46,051,000 company report Retrofit factor 1.0 NPS estimate SO2 Control efficiency 93.6% NPS estimate Control System Pressure Drop In. wc) Operating Hours per Year 8760 NPS estimate Operating Hours per Shift 8 NPS estimate Operating Shifts per Year 1095 NPS estimate Operating Labor Cost ($/hr) 40.60 $ company report Maintenance Labor Cost ($/hr) Waste generation (lb/hr) Waste disposal cost ($/ton) 5.00 $ company report Solvent usage (gpm) Solvent cost ($/kgal) 1.00 $ company report Chemical usage (lb/hr) Chemical cost ($/ton) 26.00 $ company report Electrical Cost ($/kWh) Fan-Motor Efficiency (%) Equipment Life (yr) 15 OAQPS Control Cost Manual Interest Rate (%) 7.00% OAQPS Control Cost ManualGerald Gentleman #1 Wet Scrubber
Capital Cost factors for Gas Absorbers--OAQPS Control Cost Manual, Chap 9

Cost Item Factor Cost Direct Costs Purchased equipment costs Absorber + auxiliary equipment, EC A $108,487,000 Instrumentation 0.10 A Sales taxes 0.03 A $3,254,610 Freight 0.05 A $5,424,350 Purchased equipment cost, PEC B= 1.18 A $117,165,960

Direct installation costs Foundations & supports 0.12 B $14,059,915 Handling & erection 0.40 B $46,866,384 Electrical 0.01 B $1,171,660 Piping 0.30 B $35,149,788 Insulation 0.01 B $1,171,660 Painting 0.01 B $1,171,660 Direct installation costs x 1 x 0.85 B $99,591,066

Site preparation As required, SP Buildings As required, Bldg.
Total Direct Costs, DC 1.85 B+SP+Bldg $216,757,026

Indirect Costs (installation) Engineering 0.10 B $11,716,596 Construction and field expenses 0.10 B $11,716,596 Contractor fees 0.10 B $11,716,596 Start-up 0.01 B $1,171,660 Performance test 0.01 B $1,171,660 Contingencies 0.03 B $3,514,979 Total Indirect Costs, IC 0.35 B $41,008,086

Total Capital Investment = DC + IC 2.20 B+SP+Bldg $257,765,112Gerald Gentleman #1 Wet Scrubber

Annual Cost factors for Gas Absorbers--OAQPS Control Cost Manual, Chap

Cost Item Factor Direct Annual Costs, DC Operating labor Operator 0.5 hr/shift Supervisor 15% of operator Operating materials Solvent 0 gpm * 1.00 $ /kgal = Chemicals 0 lb/hr * 26.00 $ /ton = Wastewater Disposal 0 lb/hr * 5.00 $ /ton = Maintenance Labor 0.5 hr/shift Material 100.00% of maintenance Electricity All electricity equal to: fan 0.000181 * 0 acfm* 0 in.wc* 8760 hr/yr * 0 unit cost = pump Total DC

Indirect Annual Costs, IC Overhead 60% of total labor and material costs Administrative charges 2% of Total Capital Investment Property tax 1% of Total Capital Investment Insurance 1% of Total Capital Investment Capital recovery 0.1098 * Total Capital Investment Total IC

Total Annual Cost DC + ICp 5

Cost

$22,229 $3,334

$0 $0 $0

$0 $0

$0 $25,563

$15,338 $5,155,302 $2,577,651 $2,577,651 $28,301,224 $38,627,166

$38,652,729Gerald Gentleman #1 Wet Scrubber

SO2 Uncontrolled emissions (TPY) 24,893 Control efficiency (%) 94% Emission reduction (TPY) 23,302 Controlled emissions (TPY) 1,591 Total annualized cost ($/yr) $38,652,729 Cost/ton removed ($/T) $1,659
#### Vincent GASPARRO, etc., Petitioner, v. Marjorie HORNER and Elbon Kicklighter, Respondents.

No. 41104.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 14, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
No. 72-6237.

#### Thornton *v.*Estelle, Corrections Director.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Program No. 0756-S Term Date of Award To April 30, 2012

Title: Form 6084 Billing Statements Mailers

ABR SERVICES, INC. THE DATA CENTER DIGITAL INK GRC ENTERPRIS

BASIS OF MERRIFIELD, VA SALT LAKE CITY, UT DILLSBURG, PA WARRENTON

ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION AWARD UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE C

I. PREPRESS: (a) Digital color content proofs, form and envelopes.....

..........................................................per proof 3 10.00 30.00 N/C 0.00 25.00 75.00 35.00 

 (b) Prior to Production samples....................per order 1 10.00 10.00 39.95 39.95 100.00 100.00 100.00 II. COMPLETE PRODUCT:

Per Mailer

 (1) Makeready and/or Setup 52 10.00 520.00 N/C 0.00 100.00 5,200.00 90.00 

 (2) Running Per 1,000 Copies 572 141.18 80,754.96 103.00 58,916.00 125.00 71,500.00 123.55 

III. ADDITIONAL OPERATIONS:

Re-designing and testing print templates..per template 1 50.00 50.00 N/C 0.00 75.00 75.00 300.00 

VI. Name of NCOA Licensd Full Service Provider

CONTRACTOR TOTALS $81,364.96 $58,955.95 $76,950.00 $7

DISCOUNT 2.00% $1,627.30 0.00% $0.00 0.00% $0.00 5.00% $

DISCOUNTED TOTALS $79,737.66 $58,955.95 $76,950.00 $7

AWARDED

SOURCELINK OHIO LLC

BASIS OF DAYTON, OH

ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION AWARD UNIT RATE COST

I. PREPRESS: (a) Digital color content proofs, form and envelopes.....

..........................................................per proof 3 45.00 135.00

 (b) Prior to Production samples....................per order 1 250.00 250.00II. COMPLETE PRODUCT:

Per Mailer

 (1) Makeready and/or Setup 52 288.00 14,976.00

 (2) Running Per 1,000 Copies 572 94.33 53,956.76III. ADDITIONAL OPERATIONS:

Re-designing and testing print templates..per template 1 500.00 500.00

VI. Name of NCOA Licensd Full Service Provider

CONTRACTOR TOTALS $69,817.76

DISCOUNT 0.00% $0.00

DISCOUNTED TOTALS $69,817.76

Page 1 of 1
Jacket: 735-503

Title: Army Desktop Scheduler & Guidance Letter

Agency: DLA

Bid Opening: August 31, 2023 2

Bid Terms Discounted Total

$458,854.00 2.00% 20 days $449,676.92

$550,298.49 0.50% 20 days $547,547.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

days $0.00

Monarch

Contractor Name

Advantage