alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 1.1

GRAPHIC

ARTICLES AND BY-LAWS

SANPAOLO IMI S.p.A.

A
Company registered in the Register of Banks
Reporting Bank for Bank of Italy purposes of the SANPAOLO IMI Banking Group
registered in the Register of Banking Groups
Registered Office at Piazza San Carlo 156, Turin, Italy
Share capital of Euro 5,399,548,807.68 wholly paid up
Tax code, V.A.T. number and Turin Company Register 06210280019
Italian Banking Association code number 1025-6
Member of the Interbank Deposit Guarantee Fund

Registered in the Turin Company Register on 11 May 2006

---



CONTENTS

|SECTION I    |  | CONSTITUTIONREGISTERED OFFICELIFE AND PURPOSE OF THE COMPANY |  | pag. 2 
|------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------
|SECTION II   |  | EQUITY CAPITAL AND SHARES                                      |  | pag. 2 
|SECTION III  |  | SHAREHOLDERS' MEETING                                          |  | pag. 3 
|SECTION IV   |  | DIRECTORS                                                      |  | pag. 5 
|SECTION V    |  | THE GENERAL MANAGER                                            |  | pag. 8 
|SECTION VI   |  | BOARD OF STATUTORY AUDITORS AND ACCOUNTING CONTROL             |  | pag. 8 
|SECTION VII  |  | LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND CORPORATE SEAL                        |  | pag. 10
|SECTION VIII |  | FINANCIAL RESULTS AND PROFITS                                  |  | pag. 11
|SECTION IX   |  | STATUTORY OFFICES                                              |  | pag. 11
|SECTION X    |  | RECESS                                                         |  | pag. 12
|SECTION XI   |  | WINDING UP                                                     |  | pag. 12

1

---



SECTION I
CONSTITUTIONREGISTERED OFFICELIFE AND PURPOSE OF THE COMPANY

ARTICLE
1

ARTICLE
2

ARTICLE
3

ARTICLE
4

ARTICLE
5

SECTION II
EQUITY CAPITAL AND SHARES

ARTICLE
6

2

---





ARTICLE
7

SECTION III
SHAREHOLDERS' MEETING

ARTICLE
8

3

---



ARTICLE
9

ARTICLE
10

ARTICLE
11

ARTICLE
12

ARTICLE
13

4

---



SECTION IV
DIRECTORS

ARTICLE
14

ARTICLE
15

5

---



ARTICLE
16

ARTICLE
17

6

---



ARTICLE
18

7

---



SECTION V
THE GENERAL MANAGER

ARTICLE
19

SECTION VI
BOARD OF STATUTORY AUDITORS AND ACCOUNTING CONTROL

ARTICLE
20

8

---



9

---





ARTICLE
21

SECTION VII
LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND CORPORATE SEAL

ARTICLE
22

10

---



SECTION VIII
FINANCIAL RESULTS AND PROFITS

ARTICLE
23

SECTION IX
STATUTORY OFFICES

ARTICLE
24

11

---



SECTION X
RECESS

ARTICLE
25

SECTION XI
WINDING UP

ARTICLE
26

12

---



QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-31414 Summary Calendar

JONATHAN BURAS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LARRY G. MASSANARI,

ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CV-654-N

-------------------------------------------------------

July 31, 2001

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM: *

Jonathan Buras appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Social Security

Commissioner’s denial of disabilit y benefits. Buras, relying on this court’s decision in Singletary v.

Bowen , 798 F.2d 818 (5th Cir. 1986), contends that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred in

failing to consider whether he could obtain and maintain employment. To the extent that S ingletary

is applicable to Buras’s case, he has not shown that the ALJ’s failure to consider whether he could

maintain employment is reversible error. He does not argue, and the medical evidence does not

indicate, that his physical impairment prevented him from maint aining re gular employment. S eeSingletary

, 798 F.2d at 822 (determination that claimant is unable to continue working for significant

periods of time must be supported by medical evidence). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment

upholding the Commissioner’s decision denying benefits is AFFIRMED.
TYREESE FAUST,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4303

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 26, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Frank E. Sheffield, Judge.

Kevin Robert Alvarez of Anabelle Dias P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney 

General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, B.L. THOMAS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
# 19-2703, 19-2852 (Part 2)

Packer v. Raging Capital Management

8-17-20

289.08
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Western Power Equipment Corp, a Delaware
coporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Repost"), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

     i.   the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
          Securities Exchange Act o f1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"),
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange
          Act; and

     ii.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ C. Dean McLain
-------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and President
October 29, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 341 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 341

Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
investigations and studies by the Committee on Veterans' Affairs in the 
           second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1994

  Mr. Montgomery (for himself and Mr. Stump) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts from the contingent fund of the House for expenses of 
investigations and studies by the Committee on Veterans' Affairs in the 
           second session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

    Resolved, That (a) for expenses of investigations and studies by 
the Committee on Veterans' Affairs (hereinafter in this resolution 
referred to as the ``Committee''), including expenses for--
            (1) procurement of consultant services under section 202(i) 
        of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946; and
            (2) provision of assistance for members of professional 
        staff in obtaining specialized training under section 202(j) of 
        such Act;
there shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House not more 
than $827,034.
    (b) Not more than $18,750 of the amount specified in subsection (a) 
may be used for consultant services referred to in paragraph (1) of 
such subsection and not more than $1,500 of such amount may be used for 
specialized training referred to in paragraph (2) of such subsection.
    Sec. 2. Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers 
authorized by the Committee, signed by the chairman of the Committee, 
and approved by the Committee on House Administration.
    Sec. 3. Amounts shall be available under this resolution for 
investigations and studies carried out during the period beginning at 
noon January 3, 1994, and ending immediately before noon on January 3, 
1995.
    Sec. 4. Amounts made available under this resolution shall be 
expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on 
House Administration.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Berthel Growth & Income Trust I (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
O. Brendengen, Chief Financial Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company Planning,
Inc., the Trust Advisor of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


March 22, 2005                           /s/  Ronald O. Brendengen
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                              Ronald O. Brendengen
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              Berthel Fisher & Company Planning,
                                              Inc. Trust Advisor Berthel Growth
                                              & Income Trust I
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army, Army Corps of Engineers

# AGENCY:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice; extension of application deadline; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Army Corps of Engineers published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of June 4, 2018, soliciting applications to fill vacant stakeholder representative member positions on the Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee (MRRIC). The document contained an incomplete list of stakeholder interest categories. There are three additional stakeholder interest categories. The Corps is also extending the deadline for submitting applications to August 2, 2018.                    

# DATES:

The agency must receive completed applications and endorsement letters no later than August 2, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lisa Rabbe, 816-389-3837.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of June 4, 2018, in FR Doc. 2018-11891, on page 25655, correct the fourth paragraph in the third column as follows:                    

This Notice is for individuals interested in serving as a stakeholder member on the Committee. Members and alternates must be able to demonstrate that they meet the definition of “stakeholder” found in the Charter of the MRRIC. Applications are currently being accepted for representation in the stakeholder interest categories listed below:

a. Environmental/Conservation Org;

b. Hydropower;

c. Local Government;

d. Major Tributaries;

e. Navigation;

f. Recreation;

g. Thermal Power;

h. Water Supply;

i. Conservation Districts;

j. Irrigation; and

k. Fish & Wildlife.

Dated: June 25, 2018.

Mark Harberg,

Program Manager for the Missouri River  Recovery Program (MRRP).

[FR Doc. 2018-14189 Filed 6-29-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 117 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 117

 Limiting the Official Mail Allowance for Members of the House for the 
second session of this Congress to 80 percent of that allowance for the 
                 first session, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 1993

Mr. Wise submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Limiting the Official Mail Allowance for Members of the House for the 
second session of this Congress to 80 percent of that allowance for the 
                 first session, and for other purposes.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON OFFICIAL MAIL ALLOWANCE.

    The Official Mail Allowance for each Member of the House for the 
second session of this Congress may not exceed 80 percent of that 
allowance for the first session of this Congress.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF THE DEFICIT.

    Any moneys saved as a result of section 1 and any amount that is 
made available for the Official Mail Allowance for a session of this 
Congress and is not used for that session for that purpose shall be 
returned to the Treasury for the purpose of deficit reduction.

SEC. 3. REGULATIONS.

    The Committee on House Administration shall have authority to 
prescribe regulations to carry out this resolution.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

    As used in this resolution, the term ``Member'' means a 
Representative in, or a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the 
Congress.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Real Estate Investment
      Trust of New Jersey (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
      January 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Donald W. Barney, President, Treasurer
      and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to
      18 U.S.C 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78m or
            78o(d), and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: March 19, 2003


                                              /s/  Donald W. Barney
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Donald W. Barney
                                              President, Treasurer and Chief
                                              Financial Officer
#### GEORGE W. SPARKS *vs.*JOHN P. ZEBLEY.

Foreign attachment against one of several partners quashed, the others being residents.

Foreign attachment case. Bail in $500. Sheriff returns “nulla bona; afterwards attached lands, &c., on the 17th of November, as per inquisition.” Buie on plaintiff to show his cause of action; and to show cause why the attachment should not be quashed, being issued against a resident.

On showing cause, it appeared that the cause of action was on a promissory note, given by Joseph Scott & Co., and indorsed to plaintiff; the company, consisting of three partners, viz: Scott, Zebley and another. The other two partners were residents of the State, Zebley was a non-resident.

*Mr.*Patterson.

The action will not lie against Zebley, one of the partners, alone; and we can- avail ourselves of the plea, before entering bail. It is a summary statutory proceeding, and must be subject to be met summarily by what would amount to a good plea. *(Chi. Pl.,*41; 1 *Saund. Pl. & Ev.,*153, *n.,*1, 291, *n.,*4; 2 *Ib.,*707.)

*Mr.*Bates.

The proceeding is irregular; the taking an objection, without appearing. I waive this.

2. The rule that all the partners shall be sued together is founded, not on the nature of the liability, but on grounds of convenience. It is the several, as well as the joint, obligation of the partners. The *354defendant may plead the want of it in abatement; but he must suggest the names of the partners not sued. The objection, therefore, cannot be made in this form. (5 *Burr. Rep.,*2611; 1 *Pet. Rep.,*811.)

*Patterson,*for plaintiff.

*Bates,*for defendant.

3. But whether one of several partners can be sued alone at the common law or not, he may by the express provision of our act of assembly. “ All contracts by several shall be joint and several, unless otherwise expressly stipulated.” *(Digest,*225.)

There is nothing in the nature of a partnership contract to make it differ from other contracts in this respect.

Rule absolute.
Exhibit 10.3 


 


Vickers Vantage Corp. I


1 Harbourfront Avenue, #16-06, Keppel
Bay Tower


Singapore 098632, Singapore


 


January 6, 2020


 


Vickers Venture Partners


1 Harbourfront Avenue, #16-06


Keppel Bay Tower, Singapore 098632


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm
our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement
(the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of securities of Vickers Vantage Corp. I (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the
consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described
in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”),
Vickers Venture Partners shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services as may
be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 1 Harbourfront Avenue, #16-06, Keppel Bay Tower, Singapore 098632, Singapore
(or any successor location) at no cost to the Company. Vickers Venture Partners hereby agrees that it does not have any right,
title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”)
to be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have
in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse
against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


[Signature Page Follows] 


 




     


     


    

 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	VICKERS VANTAGE CORP. I
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Jeffrey Chi
	 	 	Name:  	Jeffrey Chi
	 	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer


 


	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 
	VICKERS VENTURE PARTNERS	 
	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Jeffrey Chi	 
	 	Name:  	Jeffrey Chi	 
	 	Title: 	Managing Member	 


 


[Signature Page to Administrative Services
Agreement]
#### THOMAS S. WAPLES, p. b. respondent and plaintiff in error, *vs.*MANAEN GUM, who was defendant below, appellant in the Sup. Court, and defendant in error.

A writ of error lies to the Superior Court, in cases appealed from Justices of the Peaoe.

Writ of Error to the Superior Court in and for Sussex county. Tried at the June term, 1853, before the Chancellor, Chief Justice and Judge Wootten.

*Mr. Houston*

moved to dismiss the writ of error, on the ground that such writ would not lie to review a judgment of the Superior Court, sitting as an appellate court.

The case was originally brought-before a justice of the peace, and taken up by appeal to the Superior Court.

*Mr. Layton*

said, that though true it is that a writ of error will not lie upon a writ of error, yet under our act of assembly the trial of cases brought into the Superior Court by appeal from a justice, is to be had just as if such cases were originally instituted there. *(Const.,*13, 6, § 7; *Dig.,*118.)

*Mr. Houston*

replied, that the jurisdiction of justices of the peace was specially delegated, and there could be no appeal from their judgment, unless it was expressly given by statute. No appellate jurisdiction can be founded on this, unless it be expressly given.

The Chancellor said, that before the Constitution of 1792, there was no appeal from a justice’s judgment. By that Constitution the convention to carry out the injunction that “ trial by jury shall be as heretofore,” gave the appeal and placed the case in the Superior Court, as an original case. And it is very proper that the right of appeal shall be preserved, since the enlargement of the justice’s jurisdiction.

*405Layton, for plaintiff in error.

Houston, for defendant in error.

The other judges concurred in refusing the motion to dismiss the writ of error.

The case was then argued by *Mr.*Layton, for plaintiff in error; and *Mr.*Houston, for the defendant in error; and the judgment below was finally affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135373 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135373 

 COA: 270254 

Muskegon CC: 04-050357-FC

JASON DARNELL LOTTS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk