alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                 Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc.
               Certification of Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to
             18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
              Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


    I, F. Dixon McElwee, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Frozen Food Express Industries,
Inc. A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. and will
be retained by Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



November 14, 2003                      /s/ F. Dixon McElwee, Jr.
                                       -------------------------
                                       F. Dixon McElwee, Jr.
                                       Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                         120,147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,211
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,943
<INVENTORY>                                     63,704
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               300,106
<PP&E>                                          18,526
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 332,438
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,578
<BONDS>                                          2,730
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                     224,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   332,438
<SALES>                                        598,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               598,050
<CGS>                                          485,284
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  485,284
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,849
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,026
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,979)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,932
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,595
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,337
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,337
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
        

</TABLE>
House Calendar No. 93

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 263

[Report No. 103–263]

RESOLUTION

Waiving certain points of order against the bill

September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.partment of Defense for the fiscal year ending(H.R. 3116) making appropriations for the DeSEPTEMBER 28, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 93

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 263

[Report No. 103–263]

Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 3116) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1993

Mr. FROST, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 3116)

making appropriations for the Department of Defense

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for

other purposes.

1 Resolved, That points of order against consideration

2 of the bill (H.R. 3116) making appropriations for the De3 partment of Defense for the fiscal year ending September

4 30, 1994, and for other purposes, for failure to comply

5 with clause 7 of rule XXI are waived. During consider6 ation of the bill, all points of order against provisions in
2

HRES 263 RH

1 the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule

2 XXI are waived except as follows: beginning with ‘‘Pro3 vided’’ on page 20, line 17, through ‘‘operations:’’ on page

4 21, line 21; beginning on page 27, line 23, through line

5 25; beginning on page 108, line 20, through page 109,

6 line 5; and beginning on page 114, line 3, through page

7 115, line 10. Where points of order are waived against

8 only part of a paragraph, a point of order against matter

9 in the balance of the paragraph may be applied only within

10 the balance of the paragraph and not against the entire

11 paragraph. Points of order under clause 2 of rule XXI

12 against the amendment printed in the report of the Com13 mittee on Rules accompanying this resolution are waived.
----

----

Corrigenda

----

Corrigendum to notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/21-22/05 to constitute a reserve of heads of unit (A*9 and A*12) of Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and Slovak citizenship in the following fields: internal market, external relations, management of research programmes, management of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund, management of sustainable resources

(Official Journal of the European Union C 135 A of 2 June 2005)

(2005/C 172 A/01)

On page 17, heading C, point 1, footnote 7:

for:

‘No later than 12.00 noon, Brussels time, on 7 July 2005’,

read:

‘No later than 12.00 noon, Brussels time, on 28 July 2005’;

on page 18, heading C, point 1:

for:

‘The closing date for inscription is 7 July 2005. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time on that day’,

read:

‘The closing date for inscription is 28 July 2005. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time on that day’.

----

----

Corrigendum to notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/23-24/05 to constitute a reserve pool from which to recruit administrators (junior auditors — A*5) and (senior audit officers — A*9) of Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and Slovak citizenship

(Official Journal of the European Union C 135 A of 2 June 2005)

(2005/C 172 A/02)

On page 34, heading C, point 1, footnote 6:

for:

‘No later than 12.00 noon, Brussels time, on 7 July 2005’,

read:

‘No later than 12.00 noon, Brussels time, on 28 July 2005’;

on page 35, heading C, point 1:

for:

‘The closing date for inscription is 7 July 2005. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time on that day’,

read:

‘The closing date for inscription is 28 July 2005. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time on that day’.

----
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section a 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August 16, 2010 | /s/ Salvatore J. Zizza                                |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                             | Salvatore J. Zizza                                    |
|                             | Chief Executive Officer (Principal executive officer) |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 227 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 227

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that United States 
   Armed Forces should be withdrawn from Somalia as expeditiously as 
                               possible.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 1993

    Mr. Brown of Ohio submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that United States 
   Armed Forces should be withdrawn from Somalia as expeditiously as 
                               possible.

Whereas the famine that served as the rationale for the United States military 
        presence in Somalia has abated considerably;
Whereas both the United States and the United Nations lack a clear sense of 
        mission and purpose in Somalia, particularly with respect to the 
        deteriorating military situation;
Whereas the humanitarian mission to Somalia has been overwhelmed by the military 
        reality in that country;
Whereas United States Armed Forces in Somalia find themselves increasingly 
        vulnerable to sniper and rocket attacks, with the potential for a 
        Beirut-type car bomb disaster;
Whereas United States allies in the Somalia operation have begun to question 
        openly the basis for the mission;
Whereas the United States military presence in Somalia will cost an estimated 
        $750,000,000 for fiscal year 1993; and
Whereas the unprecedented floods and the natural disaster in the Mississippi 
        River Valley have brought to our attention the need for increased 
        assistance for domestic purposes: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives implores the President 
to withdraw United States Armed Forces from Somalia as expeditiously as 
possible.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23
                                                                      ----------



             INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT
             -------------------------------------------------------


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Western Power & Equipment Corp. on Form S-8, File #333-63775, of our report
dated October 25, 2007 with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Western Power & Equipment Corp. as of July 31, 2007 and 2006 and
for the years ended July 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Western Power & Equipment Corp. for the year
ended July 31, 2007.



                              /s/ Marcum & Kliegman LLP
                              -------------------------
                              MARCUM & KLIEGMAN LLP


New York, New York
October 25, 2007
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ike WILLIAMS.

No. 62144.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 4, 1978.

In re: Ike Williams, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition or mandamus. Parish of Calcasieu.

Application denied.
**Memorandum to the Docket -**  Notes from Call with Wade Thomason from United States

Department of Agriculture Extension at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University **Date of Conversation:** May 26 th, 2011 1. Double
- Cropping Winter Barley  W inter barley is almost always double
- cropped with soybeans  Barley is grown O ctober to J une - soybeans would be planted the next day in small grain stubble  Most common system -- 3 crops in 2 years o barley ( O ct ober to J une ) , soy (June to November), then the next rotation would either be cover crop or fallow, then corn the following year, then barley again  What are the main factors dictating a farmer's decision to plant winter barley? o Profitability — growers think of barley and wheat as winter crops in combinat ion with soybeans o Optimum soybean yields occur with full s eason (not double cropped); in double
cropping system, barley is harvested June 10
- 15 whereas wheat is harvested a bit later . S o soy can be planted earlier when double
- cropped with barley, thus higher soy yield o Winter barley in Mid
-Atlantic and Southeast goes a lmost strictly to animal feed — p igs and poultry are the largest o Barley is a very common cover crop (grows well without a lot of inputs)  Is winter barley primarily grown on land that would ot herwise remain fallow if winter barley wasn't planted? o I ncrease in barley acres leads to decrease in full year soybean–probably not displacing wheat o Barley is planted and harvested earlier than wheat o Is wheat more valuable than barley? Yes, human consumption market  They don’t grow any spring barley in the M id Atlantic or S outheast  Spring barley isn’t double cropped — spring barley is spring planted and s ummer harvested , therefore uses most of the growing season ( western regions have a 3
-4 mo noth growing season — rest of the time is left fallow, not cropped with another cash crop) 2 . Barley market  Is there a d ifference in the markets for spring and winter barley? o Not so much difference; the main distinction is between feed barley and malt barley. M ost barley in the west is intended for malting industry (much higher value than feed barley) o A fair portion of malt barley grown for that purpose doesn’t meet malting standard s and goes towards feed o M ost of the good malt barley is spring (but there could be trend toward increasing winter barley varieties suitable for malting)
#### Oscar J. HILL, Petitioner, v. MAHI MOSQUE BUILDING, INC., Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Co., and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 36224.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 27, 1967.

George F. Taylor, Jr., of Spencer & Taylor, Miami, for petitioner.

Gilbert A. Haddad, of Preddy, Haddad & Kutner, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 24, 1967.

After oral argument and upon consideration of the petition, the record and briefs we conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

Therefore, the petition is denied. The motion for attorneys’ fees is also denied.

DREW, Acting C. J., and THORNAL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and BARNS (Retired), JJ., concur.
#### HENRY BURBAGE *vs.*DAZY et al.

The writ of estrepement cannot be issued in an action of trespass quare clausum fregit.

Trespass quare clausum fregit.

*Mr. Layton*asked for a writ of estrepement founded on an affida*325vit that defendants were about to cut timber on his land and trees to pay taxes assessed for the laying out and cutting a ditch, under an order of court. The defendants were ditch commissioners.

*The Court*

refused to award the writ. It is a writ grantable only in real actions, and in the action of ejectment to which it was extended by the act of 1829. *(Digest.*167; *Higgins’ lessee*vs. *Phillips,*3 *Harr. Hep.,*49.)
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Frank, Huff and Senior Judge Haley 

A & G COAL CORPORATION AND 

 NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 1390-14-3 PER CURIAM 

 DECEMBER 16, 2014 

EDWARD BRIGHT 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (S. Vernon Priddy III; Sarah Y. M. Himmel; Two Rivers Law 

Group, P.C., on brief), for appellants. 

(Paul L. Phipps; Mingkwan Emme Collins; Lee and Phipps, P.C., 

on brief), for appellee. 

 A & G Coal Corporation and New Hampshire Insurance Company (appellants) appeal a 

decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (the “commission”). Appellants allege the 

commission erred in upholding decisions of the deputy commissioner: 1) refusing to leave the 

record open after the hearing to permit appellants to obtain an independent medical examination 

of Edward Bright; 2) finding Bright proved he sustained a work injury by accident; and 

3) concluding Bright established a mechanical change to his body caused by the accident. We 

have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without 

merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See 

Bright v. A & G Coal, Corp., JCN VA00000851999 (June 30, 2014). We dispense with oral 

argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

UNPUBLISHED 
 - 2 - 

in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code 

§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

 Affirmed.
Program 5371-S Term Date of Award through June 30, 2015, plus up to 4 Option Years

Title:_Navy Award Folders
Bosworth Printing Duke Printing Navitor Pioneer Printing Precision Printing | Previous Contractor
5371S BASIS OF 200-13436 190-28707, 220-86059 310-69348 240-70722
TTEM NO. DESCRIPTION AWARD [UNIT RATE]__COST [UNIT RATE] COST [UNIT RATE[ COST [UNIT RATE] COST [UNIT RATE] Cost | UNIT RATE[_ COST
ia MAKING DIES:

@) [Die 25 Square Inch Cost per Die: 2 105.00) 210.00] 100.00] 200.00] 12.00] 24.00[ 115.00 230,00] 30.00} 180.00} 120.00] 7240.00}

(b) [Die, SO Square Inch Cost per Die: 2 160.00) 320.00) 165.00} 330.00) 24.00) 48.00) 160.00] 320.00) 150.00) 300,00 170,00) 340.00)

(©) [Die, 100 Square Inch Cost per Die: 2 240.00 480.00) 250.00) 500.00) 48.00) 96.00) 210.00 420.00) 275.00) 550.00 230.00} 460.00}

ia PRINTING AND DISTRIBUTION:

(a) __|Folders Flat: 9¥2 x 24” 0.00} 0.00] 0.00) 0.00] 0.00) 0.00}
(i) __|Makeready and/or Setup .» per folder: 27 86.00] 2,322.00) 90.00] 2,430.00) 0.00) 0.00| 67,00| 1,809.00) 80.00] 2,160.00) 69.00] 1,863.00
(2) {Running per 100 copies: 13 145.00] 1,885.00 40.00} 520.00|_245.45| 3,190.85] 21.50} 279.50| 40.00] 520.00] 22.00] 286.00

(b) [Folders Flat: 0.00) 0.00 0.00] 0.00] 0.00] 0.00
(1) |Makeready and/or Setup .. per folder: 5 86.00) 430.00) 95.00} 475.00} 0.00) 0,00} 67.00} 335,00} 90.00) 450.00) 69.00} 345.00)
(2) |Running per 100 copies: 21 145.00] 3,045.00) 40.00} 840.00) 245.45| 5,154.45) 21,50} 451.50} 40.00) 840.00) 22.00 462.00

(¢)___|Printing in one color of ink...per folder......: 0.00) 0.00} 0.00] 0.00] 0.00] 0.00)
(I) __|Makeready and/or Setup per folder: 3 90.00) 270.00| 175.00} 525.00] 0.00) 0.00{— 116.00) 348.00{— 268.00 804.00{ 116.00 348.00]
(2) ___ [Running per 100 capies: 10 55.75) 557.50) 40.00} 400.00} 213.41[ 2,134.10 13.00) 130,00) 18.00 180.00) 13.00) 130.00

@ [Printing lor per side...per folder 0.00) 0.00} 0.00] 0.00) 0.00! 0.00)
()___|Makeready and/or Setup. .. per folder: 3 37.00 111.00] 90.00] 270.00] 0.00] 0.00] 80.00] 240.00{ 108.00 324.00) 80.00) 240.00
(2) [Running per 100 copies: 7 7.00] 49.00] 75.00| 525.00] 56.00| 392,00] 8.00] 56.00} 2.35] 16.45| 8.00} 56.00]

fig |STOCK:

1. White and Colored Felt Finish Cover ... per 100; 124, 5,431.20) 30.00] 3,720.00 38.50] 4,774.00! 36.00] 4,464.00) 38.00] 4,712.00) 35.00] 4,340.00)

2. White and Colored Linen Cover .. per 100: 30 982.50] 30.00] 900.00} 49.00] 1,470.00 26.00] 780.00) 29.00) 870.00) 26.00) 780.00)

3. White and Colored High Gloss (CiS) «. per 100: 2 145.10] 20.00] 40.00] 85.00} 170.00) 33.00] 66.00] 41.00] 82.00] 33.00) 66.00)

4. White and Colored Index... 3 26.00} 78.00| 7.50| 22.50] 19.00| 57.00] 7.50] 22.50]

5. White and Color Litho Coatet 3 27.00} 81.00| 28.50} 18. 54,00} 0 28.50]

TOTAL $16,345.55, $11,765.00 $17,612.40 $9,980.00 $12,099.45 $10,007.60
Discount, 1.00%] $163.46 $0.00 $0.00 7.00%|~__ $99.80 5.00%| $604.97 8.00%] ___ $800.56
Net Total $16,182.09 $11,765.00 $17,612.40 $9,880.20 $11,494.48 $9,206.44
lAbstracted By: Joy Gooden
Reviewed By: AWARDED
#### Hubert KING, Petitioner, v. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, Respondent.

No. 36582.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 11, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 1, 1967.

Paul R. Stern, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.

Jesse F. Sparks, Jr., of Gurney, Gurney & Handley, Orlando, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lake-land, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 22, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that *4there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The motion of petitioner for attorneys’ fees in this Court is denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION of CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT to SECTION 1350 of CHAPTER 63 of TITLE 18 of the UNITED STATES CODE,

as ADOPTED PURSUANT to

SECTION 906 of THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Frischs Restaurants, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 18, 2005 (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Registrant certifies,
pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                        
|---------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                 |  |  | 
|October 21, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    CRAIG F. MAIER
|                 |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Craig F. Maier         
|                 |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Chief Executive Officer



This certification is being furnished
as required by Rule 13a  14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as other
otherwise stated in such filing.
#### The NORTH ORLANDO COMPANY, a Florida corporation, and North Orlando Utilities Company, a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. LANDMARK ENTERPRISES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-792.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 26, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Seminole County; Clarence Johnson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.