alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on External Engagement (EE), pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

# TIME AND DATE: 

Friday, June 29, 2018, from 3:00-4:00 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE: 

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. An audio link will be available for the public. Members of the public must contact the Board Office to request the public audio link by sending an email to                         *nationalsciencebrd@nsf.gov*                         at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference.                    

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Prepare for the July NSB meeting; discuss the recent Community College Innovation Challenge listening session; plan for the next session in South Carolina; and discuss future directions and opportunities for the committee.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Nadine Lymn (                        *nlymn@nsf.gov*), 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.                    

                        Meeting information and updates may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​notices/​.jsp#sunshine.*                         Please refer to the National Science Board website at                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for general information.                    

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2018-13790 Filed 6-22-18; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 7, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130657 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

LARRY LONG, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130657 

 COA: 256593 

Wayne CC: 03-303990-NI

BRIDGEWOOD APARTMENTS, L.L.C., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we MODIFY the judgment of the Court of Appeals to 

remove the reference to MCL 554.139(1), which plaintiff did not raise, and to clarify that 

the trial court must determine whether plaintiff was an invitee, a licensee, or a trespasser. 

In all other respects, the application is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0531 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 7, 2006 

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I,
Howard S. Modlin, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer,
and I, William G. Henry, Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief
Financial Officer, each of General DataComm Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), do
each hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

         (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
June 30, 2005 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         This Certification accompanies this Form 10-QSB as an exhibit, but
shall not be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the
Company or the certifying officer.



                                      /s/ HOWARD S. MODLIN
                                      ------------------------------------------
Date:  August 15, 2005                Howard S. Modlin,
                                      Chairman of the Board, President and
                                      Chief Executive Officer



                                      /s/ WILLIAM G. HENRY
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      William G. Henry
                                      Vice President, Finance and Administration
                                      and Chief Financial Officer

                                       36
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 283 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 283

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 27, 1993.
    Resolved, That all points of order against the conference report to 
accompany the bill (H.R. 2492) making appropriations for the government of the 
District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in part against 
the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and 
for other purposes, are waived. The motions printed in the joint explanatory 
statement of the committee of conference to dispose of amendments in 
disagreement shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TIMOTHY ALLEN PARSONS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 324 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### H. D. SAHAGIAN, Jr., and Old Pilgrim Insurance Agency, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, Appellants, v. Regina I. GALL, Appellee.

No. 69-519.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourtli District.

June 22, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Neis R. Pearson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# Official Journal C 92/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 92 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6610 March 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 92

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6610 March 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 92/01 | Commission Decision of 20 February 2023 approving, on behalf of the European Union, the modification of Annexes XVII-C and XVII-D to the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 92/01

Commission Decision of 20 February 2023 approving, on behalf of the European Union, the modification of Annexes XVII-C and XVII-D to the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### ROUSE F. YOUNG & GEORGE HALL *vs.*GEORGE BENNETT.

On a judgment note given to an unmarried woman, who afterwards marries, judgment cannot be entered at the suit of her husband alone.

On Certiorari to Justice Jefferson, the record showed a judgment by warrant of attorney, on anote under seal for $29 05, given by the defendants, Young and Hall, to Abigail D. Draper. The entry of judgment was as follows, after copy of the note “ Action of debt on a judgment note, dated the 9th day of March, 1847, for $29 05, interest is $8 71, in virtue of which judgment is this day given in favor of the said George Bennett, in right of his wife, Abigail, formerly Abigail D. Draper, to which is annexed a warrant of attorney, authorizing any justice of the peace in the State of Delaware to enter judgment on the above obligation, with stay of execution six months. And now, to wit, judgment is this day given in favor of George Bennett, plaintiff, against Rouse F. Young and ,George Hall, security, for the sum of $37 76, in virtue of said obligation and-warrant of attorney, this 16 th day of March, A. D., 1852.”

*McFee,*for reversal.

*The Court*

reversed this judgment for want of proper parties. On a bond or single bill given to a woman before marriage, she must be joined in any action brought after marriage; and the husband cannot sue alone. The judgment in this case should have been at the suit of George Bennett and Abigail, his wife, late Abigail D. Draper, against Rouse F. Young and George Hall. It is not proper either to style him security, as both the defendants are principals.

Judgment reversed.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 15 - 00161 - CV HARRIS HUGHEY APPELLANT V. JAY W. HAND AND DONA LD SHIELDS APPELLEES

---------- FROM THE 367TH DISTR ICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 14

- 08039

- 367

--------- - 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Harris Hughey filed a notice of appeal on May 8, 2015, appealing from the trial court’s dismissal of his claims against appellees Jay W. Hand and Donald Shields. This court was informed by the trial court clerk t hat the trial judge had not signed an order in this case. On May 14, 2015, we notified the parties of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal because there appeared to be no final order

. On May 19, 2015, we received a copy of the trial

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 c ourt’s order granting the appellees’ motion to dismiss that had been filed on May 18, 2 015. A motion for an award of damages and costs was still pending when the order on the motion to dismiss was signed. So on May 21, 2015, we notified the parties of o ur concern that we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal because the order on the motion to dismiss did not appear to be a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order. Subsequently, the trial court considered Hughey’s motion for new trial and
requ est for reconsideration and , upon reconsideration, denied the appellees’ motion to dismiss. Hand then filed a notice of appeal under cause no. 02

- 15

- 00239

- CV. On July 9, 2015, we notified the parties that it appeared that this appeal was now moot. On J uly 27, 2015, Hughey filed a motion to dismiss for mootness. On July 30, 2015, Hand filed a response to Hughey’s motion. Hand stated that although he did not oppose dismissal of this appeal, he requested that this appeal be consolidated with his appeal. Because, as Hand concedes, the appeal under cause no. 02

- 15

- 00239

- CV will address the parties’ issues, we are of the opinion that the motion to dismiss should be granted. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1) , 43.2( f). PER CURIAM
PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and SUDDERTH, J. DELIVERED: August 13, 2015
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Subpart W

Meeting Documentation: Independent Petroleum Association of Mountain States (IPAMS) 5/27/10

Date Staff Contact 

Information (Name, 

email, phone #)

Name of 

Organization 

(Attach list of all 

attendees names 

and emails if 

possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, 

reporting requirements, etc.)

Written 

Comments 

Provided?

Did they

also submit 

to Docket?

Date sent to

EPA- CCD

5/27/10

Roger Fernandez

Akachi Imegwu

Kate Cardamone

Ragan Tate

Sandy Seastream, ICF

Katie Schroder, 

Bjork Lindley Little

Gabriel Graham and 

Heidi Handy,

Beatty & Wozniak

Patrick Flynn, 

Resolute Energy

Daniel Pringand and 

Doug Henderer, 

Buys & Associates

Rick Matar, Jim 

Tangeman and Sarah 

Bartlett, 

Williams

Brad Rogersand 

Mike Pontiff, 

Newfield

John Jacusand and

Todd Weaver, 

DavisGraham & 

Stubbs

Dan Ryan, Andrea 

Dvorak, Catherine 

Fontainne and Craig 

Brown, 

See following pages Written 

comments 

were submitted 

prior to the 

meeting, see 

below
Questar

Jagadeesan 

Sethuraman, Clay 

Taylor, Tom 

Gibbons, and Elvera 

Berryman,

Whiting

Brian Lockard, 

Noble Energy

Peg Young, 

Bill Barrett Corp.

Kathleen Sgamma, 

IPAMS
From: Kathleen Sgamma <KSgamma@ipams.org> 

 

 To: Roger Fernandez/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

 Date: 05/25/2010 10:55 AM 

 

 Subject: Re: Meeting Confirmation 

 

Roger

Here's a proposed outline for the call. We look forward to speaking with you.

Kathleen

1) Affect on Industry

2) Definitions:

a) “Facility” (“Reporting Area”)

b) “Natural Gas Processing Plant”

c) Well Types (“conventional” and “unconventional”)

3) Sources:

a) Gathering Pipeline Fugitives (flow or intra-facility gas lines)

b) Component Counts

c) Reciprocating Compressor Rod Packing

d) Dissolved CO2 in Liquids (EOR)

e) Portable Combustion Sources
f) Standby Equipment

g) Contracted Sources

4) Development of Screening Levels and Screening Tool

5) Data Gathering:

a) Direct Monitoring and Measurement

b) Sampling Frequency

c) Best Available Monitoring Methods

6) Reporting:

a) Data Reporting Area (§98.236 requires reporting for each field in the basin)

b) Use Data Gathered in First Year – Emission Factor Development for Subsequent Years

7) Costs

8) Effective Date

Kathleen
API / IPAMS Meeting

Teleconference

May 27, 2010 3:00 pm EDT

List of Issues Discussed

1. EPA should reconsider the short timeframe for implementation of subpart W 

2. EPA should reconsider the definition of natural gas plants

3. EPA’s cost for subpart W is too low

4. EPA’s sampling requirements are too costly

5. EPA should exclude gathering pipeline fugitives

6. EPA should allow more emission factors and engineering methods

7. EPA’s inclusion of portable combustion sources is unreasonable
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Gold Standard, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the period ending April 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Amended Quarterly Report"), We, Scott L. Smith, President and director and
Bret C. Decker, Secretary of our Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Amended Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Amended Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

Dated: 8/17/05                           /s/Scott L. Smith
      --------------                     ---------------------------
                                         Scott L. Smith
                                         President and director


Dated: 8/17/05                           /s/Bret C. Decker
      --------------                     ---------------------------
                                         Bret C. Decker
                                         Secretary and director
Exhibit 10



 RESOLULTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTED NOVEMBER 16, 1999


     RESOLVED, that the Company establish a Senior Executive
Bonus Pool for fiscal 1999 payable to Herbert F. Imhoff, the
Company's Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and
to Herbert F. Imhoff, Jr., the Company's President and Chief
Operating Officer, with the total sum of the pool to be divided
between the two executives, with 65% of the bonus pool to be paid
to Herbert F. Imhoff, Sr. and the remaining 35% of the bonus pool
to be paid to Herbert F. Imhoff, Jr.

The Executive Bonus Pool will be equal to a total amount based
upon the following contingency formula:

    No executive bonus will be earned unless the Company's
  consolidated pretax earnings before executive bonuses exceed
  $5,000,000.

    If consolidated pretax earnings before executive bonuses
  exceed $5,000,000 but are less than $5,500,000 a bonus amount
  equal to 20% of the Company's pretax earnings before executive
  bonuses which exceed $5,000,000 will be accrued and added to the
  Executive Bonus Pool.

    If consolidated pretax earnings before executive bonuses
  exceed $5,500,000, a bonus amount equal to 25% of the Company's
  pretax earnings before executive bonuses which exceed $5,000,000
  will be accrued and added to the Executive Bonus Pool.

The contingency terms of this Executive Bonus Pool formula merely
establishes the year-end bonus percentage rate and are not
cumulative ... one rate (20%) or the other (25%) will determine the
total amount of the bonus pool.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Larry CHAPMAN v. C. Paul PHELPS, Secretary Department of Corrections.

No. 62598.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Larry Chapman applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         331,019
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,755,904
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 13,348,534
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,121,079
<PP&E>                                       3,266,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,525,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,907,740
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,958
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,006,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,525,128
<SALES>                                     27,393,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,393,678
<CGS>                                       16,133,042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,592,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               861,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,364
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,364
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,364
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 228 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 228

      To declare that July 28, 1993, be recognized as Parents Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 1993

  Mr. Burton of Indiana submitted the following resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      To declare that July 28, 1993, be recognized as Parents Day.

Whereas the values of sacrificial love and integrity are fundamental in 
        developing the moral character essential to maintaining a strong nation;
Whereas parents by their example of sacrificial love and the transmission of 
        moral and cultural values play a crucial and determinant role in the 
        development of youth;
Whereas time has demonstrated that the traditional American family is the most 
        stable and secure environment in which parents can successfully rear 
        future generations;
Whereas the current breakdown of the traditional American family is a major 
        factor contributing to the rise of crime, teen pregnancy, educational 
        failure, substance abuse, and suicide among our Nation's youth; and
Whereas it is in the interest of society and government to adopt policies that 
        help families stay together by strengthening and sustaining fathers and 
        mothers in fulfilling their parental roles: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That on Parents Day, July 28, 1993, all private citizens, 
organizations, and governmental and legislative bodies at the local, 
State, and Federal level are encouraged to recognize this day through 
proclamations, activities, and educational efforts in the furtherance 
of recognizing, uplifting, and supporting the role of parents in the 
rearing of their children.

                                 <all>
```