alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                   BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORPORATION
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            For the Year Ended December 31
                                   -------------------------------------------------
                                     1999       1998       1997      1996     1995
                                   ---------  ---------  --------  --------  -------
                                                (dollars in thousands)
<S>                                <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>
Interest costs and amortization
   of debt costs                   $ 24,940   $ 26,273   $ 20,308  $  7,868  $   725
Interest costs capitalized
   during the period                    204      1,025          -         -        -
Interest factor related to
   noncapitalized leases (1)          6,265      5,207      4,456     4,839    2,203
                                   --------   --------   --------  --------  -------
   Total fixed charges             $ 31,409   $ 32,505   $ 24,764  $ 12,707  $ 2,928
                                   ========   ========   ========  ========  =======

Income before income taxes         $130,427   $ 95,911   $ 99,784  $ 93,812  $71,370
Total fixed charges                  31,409     32,505     24,764    12,707    2,928
Less:  Interest capitalized            (204)    (1,025)         -         -        -
                                   --------   --------   --------  --------  -------
Total earnings before
   fixed charges                   $161,632   $127,391   $124,548  $106,519  $74,298
                                   ========   ========   ========  ========  =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges      5.1        3.9        5.0       8.4     25.4
</TABLE>

(1)  Interest expense for operating leases with terms of one year or longer is
     based on an imputed interest rate for each lease.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRUCE DWAIN COPELAND,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. ,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 15

- 56321
D.C. No. 2:13

- cv - 01578

- JLS

- E

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 11, 2017 **

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Bruce Dwain Copeland appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in his diversity action alleging claims of intentional interference with

contract and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage . We have jurisdiction under 2 8 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Guidiville Band of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 25 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 56321

Pomo Indians v. NGV Gaming, LTD , 531 F.3d 767, 772 (9th Cir. 2008) , and we

affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment because Copeland
failed to raise a genuine dispute of material f act as to whether Bank of America
had knowledge of an economic relationship between Copeland and his tenant and
whether Bank of America interfered with that relationship

. See id . at 774
(elements for intentional interference with contracts under Californi a law ); Pardi

v. Kaiser Found. Hosps. , 389 F.3d 840, 852 (9th Cir. 2004) (elements for
intentional interference with prospective economic advantage under California

law ).

The district court did not abuse its discretion when it declined to c onsider Copeland’s unauthenticated documents as evidence in opposition to the motion for
summary judgment

. See Orr v. Bank of Am

. , NT & SA , 285 F.3d 764, 773 (9th Cir.
2002) (setting forth standard of review and stating that “unauthenticated

documents cannot be considered in a motion for summary judgment” ). We reject as meritless Copeland’s arguments that the district court was

biased against him , held him to a higher pleading standard , and improperly considered Bank of America’s summary judgment evidence after d enying its3 15

- 56321

motion to compel

. We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on
appeal. See Smith v. Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999)

.
AFFRIMED.
# Official Journal C 221/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 221 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 636 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 221

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 636 July 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 221/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9641 – SNAM/FSI/OLT) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2020/C 221/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9582 – Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy/Senvion (European onshore wind turbine service)/Ria Blades) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 221/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9641 – SNAM/FSI/OLT) (
  1
  )

1

1

2020/C 221/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9582 – Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy/Senvion (European onshore wind turbine service)/Ria Blades) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 221/03 | Euro exchange rates — 3 July 2020 | 3 |
| 2020/C 221/04 | Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 221/03

Euro exchange rates — 3 July 2020

3

2020/C 221/04

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 221/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9826 – Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings/UBE Industries/JV) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 221/06 | Publication of an application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 221/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9826 – Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings/UBE Industries/JV) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

5

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2020/C 221/06

Publication of an application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 179 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 43

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 179

                          [Report No. 103-101]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (S. 1) to amend the Public Health Service Act to revise and extend 
   the programs of the National Institutes of Health, and for other 
     purposes, and against consideration of such conference report.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 20, 1993

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
                                                  House Calendar No. 43
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 179

                          [Report No. 103-101]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (S. 1) to amend the Public Health Service Act to revise and extend 
   the programs of the National Institutes of Health, and for other 
     purposes, and against consideration of such conference report.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 1993

  Ms. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (S. 1) to amend the Public Health Service Act to revise and extend 
   the programs of the National Institutes of Health, and for other 
     purposes, and against consideration of such conference report.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (S. 1) to 
amend the Public Health Service Act to revise and extend the programs 
of the National Institutes of Health, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived.
```
#### ORANGE MOTORS OF MIAMI, INC., a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. DREW NATIONAL LEASING CORP., Respondent.

No. 41131.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 10, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 12, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 247 So.2d 345.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ADKINS, J., dissents.
The Attorney General of Texas 

December 23, 1982 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney General 

Supreme Court Building 

P. 0. Box 12548 

Austin. TX. 78711. 2548 

5121475-2501 

Telex 9101874-1367 

Telecopier 5121475-0266 

1607 Main St., Suite 1400 

Dallas, TX. 75201.4709 

2141742.8944 

4824 Alberta Ave., Suite 160 

El Paso, TX. 79905.2793 

9151533.3484 

1220 Dallas Ave.. Suite 202 

Houston. TX. 77002-6986 

7131650-0666 

806 Broadway, Suite 312 

Lubbock, TX. 79401.3479 

8061747-5238 

4309 N. Tenth, Suite B 

McAllen. TX. 78501.1685 

5121682.4547 

200 Main Plaza, Suite 400 

San Antonio. TX. 78205.2797 

512/225-4191 

An Equal Opportunity/ 

Affirmative Action Employer 

Honorable Hamp Atkinson, Chairman 

House Public Education Committee 

Texas House of Representatives 

P. 0. Box 2910 

Austin, Texas 78769 

Opinion No. m-531 

Re: Whether school board of 

trustees may organize at times 

other than that provided in 

section 23.19 of the Education 

Code 

Dear Representative Atkinson: 

You have asked whether an independent school district board of 

trustees may organize at any time other than that specified in section 

23.19 of the Texas Education Code. Section 23.19 provides in 

pertinent part: 

(d) At the first meeting after each election 

and qualification of trustees, the members shall 

organize by selecting [a board president, 

secretary, treasurer, an assessor and collector of 

taxes, and] such other officers and committees as 

the board may deem necessary. 

Independent school districts may conduct an election for school 

trustees on one of the four dates specified in article 2.01b of the 

Texas Election Code. Under section 23.19 of the Education Code, the 

trustees "shall organize" at the first meeting following each election 

and the qualification of trustees. This section neither states nor 

implies, however, that the trustees may not organize at any other 

time, and in our opinion such a prohibition should not be read into 

it. There may be times during the school year in which the board may 

need to reorganize -- for example, when one or more of the officers of 

the board resigns and new officers must be chosen -- and we do not 

believe the legislature intended that such a reorganization would not 

then be authorized. We therefore answer your question in the 

affirmative. 

SUMMARY 

An independent school district board of 

trustees may organize at some time other than that 

p. 1921 
Honorable Hamp Atkinson - Page 2 (MN-531) 

specified in section 23.19 of the Texas Education 

Code. 

ati 

Attorney General of Texas 

JOHN W. FAINTER, JR. 

First Assistant Attorney General 

RICHARD E. GRAY III 

Executive Assistant Attorney General 

Prepared by Jon Bible 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

Susan L. Garrison, Chairman 

Jon Bible 

Rick Gilpin 

Patricia Hinojosa 

Jim Moellinger 

p. 1922
Order entered August 9 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00119
- CR RYAN WALLACE, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. F10
- 73110
- R



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant des ires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
trial court shall c onduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective represe ntation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Massey Energy Company (the
Company) for the quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don L. Blankenship, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                 |  |                                                
|---------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|November 9, 2006 |  | /s/ Don L. Blankenship                         
|                 |  | Don L. Blankenship                             
|                 |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2008240EN.01S00301.xml

| 19.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
#### Mrs. Vera Ruppel BAUMGARTNER et al. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. et al.

No. 60210.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 1977.

In re: Mrs. Vera Ruppel Baumgartner, et al. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 346 So.2d 277.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THIS DATA
HAS BEEN RESTATED AS A RESULT OF A POOLING OF INTEREST TRANSACTION CONSUMMATED
IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          71,348
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  821,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,682
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,004,056
<PP&E>                                         314,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                 192,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,732,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,185,763
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       227,897
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,732,457
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               607,009
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  560,988
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,023)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   913
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,516
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,672
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,330
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,330
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 30731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13995]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee 
(HICPAC); Notice of Charter Amendment

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of charter amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This gives notice under (the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 
October 6, 1972, that the Healthcare Infection Control Practices 
Advisory Committee (HICPAC), Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, has amended their 
charter to increase the number and meetings from approximately three 
times per year to up to eight times per year. Also, this amendment 
gives notice to change the name of the DNV Healthcare to DNV-GL; to add 
the American Society of Nephrology (ASN), the American Association of 
Kidney Patients (AAKP), the Pediatric Infectious Disease Society 
(PIDS), and the National Association of Directors of Nursing 
Administration (NADONA) as non-voting liaison organizations to the 
committee, and to include expertise in environmental microbiology; and 
increase the number of meetings up to eight times a year. The amended 
filing date is May 4, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Stone, M.A., HICPAC, Division of 
Healthcare Quality Promotion, NCEZID, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE, 
Mailstop A-31, Atlanta, Georgia 30333; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6820212b38292b280b0c0b460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="723a3b31223331321116115c151d04">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2018-13995 Filed 6-28-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Don PENNINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-48.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 30, 1973.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PIERCE (Ret.), Judge.

Appellant Don Pennington was tried and convicted in the Polk County Criminal Court of Record of the offense of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony, and with grand larceny. He was thereupon adjudged guilty and sentenced to serve a term in the State Prison. He has appealed the judgment and sentence to this Court. The Public Defender, appointed to represent Pennington on this appeal, has filed brief in this Court in his behalf.

After reviewing the facts contained in the record, the Public Defender says in his brief that he “has carefully examined the record on appeal and can find nothing which could arguably support an appeal, and for this reason . . . would respectfully request to be relieved as Attorney of Record and would cite as authority therefor the case of Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493.”

The Public Defender has served a copy of his said brief upon appellant Pennington, and on July 26, 1972, this Court entered order giving Pennington thirty (30) days therefrom to file any additional brief he might desire “calling the Court’s attention to any matters that he feels should be considered in connection with the appeal in this cause.” No additional brief has been filed.

We have thereupon carefully examined the entire record on file here on behalf of appellant Pennington, and find nothing therein sufficient to justify a reversal of the judgment appealed. Accordingly the judgment is thereupon—

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and LILES, J., concur.
#### Elizabeth M. DUFFY, Petitioner, v. Ronald E. MAY and Donna Lynn May, Respondents.

No. 42839.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 7, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 11, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 266 So.2d 417.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.