alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 76/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.076.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 76 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5323 March 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.076.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 76

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5323 March 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 215/2010 of 5 March 2010 amending Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 laying down a list of third countries, territories, zones or compartments from which poultry and poultry products may be imported into and transit through the Community and the veterinary certification requirements (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 215/2010 of 5 March 2010 amending Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 laying down a list of third countries, territories, zones or compartments from which poultry and poultry products may be imported into and transit through the Community and the veterinary certification requirements (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          24,326
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,618
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,483
<INVENTORY>                                     38,068
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,348
<PP&E>                                          14,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,651
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,533
<SALES>                                        731,955
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               731,955
<CGS>                                          652,404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  652,404
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                83,687
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (245)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,891)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       812
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,703)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (6,240)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,943)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.05)


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 84/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 84 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 513 April 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 84

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 513 April 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 084/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5033 — Philips/Respironics) (1) | 1 |
| 2008/C 084/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5038 — Telefónica/Turmed/Rumbo) (1) | 1 |
| 2008/C 084/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4972 — Permira/Arysta) (1) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2008/C 084/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5033 — Philips/Respironics) (1)

1

2008/C 084/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5038 — Telefónica/Turmed/Rumbo) (1)

1

2008/C 084/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4972 — Permira/Arysta) (1)

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 084/04 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |
| 2008/C 084/05 | Results of sales of wine alcohol held by public agencies | 4 |
| 2008/C 084/06 | Guidelines for the examination of State aid to fisheries and aquaculture | 10 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2008/C 084/04

Euro exchange rates

3

2008/C 084/05

Results of sales of wine alcohol held by public agencies

4

2008/C 084/06

Guidelines for the examination of State aid to fisheries and aquaculture

10

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 084/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5069 — Tata Motors/Jaguar/Land Rover) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 17 |
| 2008/C 084/08 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5119 — Dow/Cp Chem/Americas Styrenics JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 18 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

2008/C 084/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5069 — Tata Motors/Jaguar/Land Rover) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

17

2008/C 084/08

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5119 — Dow/Cp Chem/Americas Styrenics JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

18

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 810 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 810

                  For the relief of Elizabeth M. Hill.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1993

 Mr. Stenholm introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Elizabeth M. Hill

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Elizabeth M. Hill--
            (1) the sum of $6,780, and
            (2) interest on such sum--
                    (A) calculated at the rate determined in the manner 
                provided in subsections (a) and (b) of section 1961 of 
                title 28, United States Code, and
                    (B) payable for the period beginning on October 5, 
                1985, and ending on the date on which such sum is paid.
Such sum represents the amount that was recovered by the United States 
under Public Law 87-693 (76 Stat. 593; 42 U.S.C. 2651 et seq.) in 
satisfaction of its claim against a tortiously liable third person for 
the value of medical care and treatment the United States furnished to 
Elizabeth M. Hill, but would have been recovered by Elizabeth M. Hill 
if a timely request for a waiver of such claim had been submitted on 
her behalf.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY'S AND AGENT'S FEES.

    Not more than 10 percent of the sums appropriated by section 1 
shall be paid to or received by any agent or attorney for services 
rendered in connection with the claim described in such section. Any 
person who violates this section shall be fined not more than $1,000.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


          <ARTICLE> UT
          <CIK> 0000077227
          <NAME> PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY
          <MULTIPLIER> 1,000
          <CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
                 
          <S>                              <C>        
          <PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
          <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997
          <PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1997
          <PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1997
          <EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
          <BOOK-VALUE>                        PER-BOOK
          <TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          1,808,695
          <OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>           67,804
          <TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>               251,853
          <TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>             441,631
          <OTHER-ASSETS>                             0
          <TOTAL-ASSETS>                     2,569,983
          <COMMON>                             105,812
          <CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>            285,486
          <RETAINED-EARNINGS>                  395,799
          <TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>       787,097
          <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                105,000  <F1>
          <PREFERRED>                           16,681
          <LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                 676,455
          <SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                    67,000
          <LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                  0
          <COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>        18,921
          <LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>         30,010
          <PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                  0
          <CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>            3,654
          <LEASES-CURRENT>                      19,600
          <OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>       845,565
          <TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      2,569,983
          <GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>            537,615
          <INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                  43,144
          <OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>           401,360
          <TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>           444,504
          <OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>               93,111
          <OTHER-INCOME-NET>                       852
          <INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>        93,963
          <TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>              32,228  <F2>
          <NET-INCOME>                          61,735
          <PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              318
          <EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>         61,417
          <COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              30,000  <F3>
          <TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>             48,919
          <CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                81,131
          <EPS-PRIMARY>                              0
          <EPS-DILUTED>                              0
          <FN>
          <F1> REPRESENTS COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE PREFERRED
          <F1> SECURITIES OF $105,000
          <F2> INCLUDES DIVIDENDS ON COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
          <F2> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $4,594.
          <F3> REPRESENTS COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS PAID TO PARENT CORPORATION.
          </FN>
                  <PAGE>



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<CIK> 0000053456
<NAME> JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,989,098
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    581,315
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         469,826
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     3,220,915
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,261,154
<COMMON>                                       153,713
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      510,769
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            886,196    <F1>
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,550,678
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          206,500    <F2>
<PREFERRED>                                     37,741
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,133,700
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  84,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   40,013
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        2,500
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                71,947
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               3,134,075
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,261,154
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,578,159
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            94,237
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,258,901
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,353,138
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        225,021
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               5,460
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 230,481
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        79,736    <F3>
<NET-INCOME>                                   150,745
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      7,140
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  143,605
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       150,000    <F4>
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       87,210
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         337,239
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS OF $425.
<F2> INCLUDES AMOUNT FOR COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
<F2> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $125,000.
<F3> INCLUDES AMOUNT FOR COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
<F3> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $8,025.
<F4> REPRESENTS COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS PAID TO PARENT CORPORATION.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 232

Expressing the condolences of the House on the death of Representative

Henry.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1993

Mr. DINGELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the condolences of the House on the death of

Representative Henry.

1 Resolved, That the House has heard with profound

2 sorrow of the death of the Honorable Paul B. Henry, a

3 Representative from the State of Michigan.

4 Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the

5 House as the Speaker may designate, together with such

6 Members of the Senate as may be joined, be appointed

7 to attend the funeral.

8 Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms of the House

9 be authorized and directed to take such steps as may be

10 necessary for carrying out the provisions of these resolu-
2

HRES 232 ATH

1 tions and that the necessary expenses in connection there2 with be paid out of the contingent fund of the House.

3 Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolu4 tions to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the

5 family of the deceased.

6 Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it ad7 journ as a further mark of respect to the memory of the

8 deceased.

Æ
#### STAPF *v.*STATE

[No. 108,

September Term, 1962.]

*Decided November 21, 1962.*

*107The cause was argued before Bruñe, C. J., and Henderson, Prescott, Horney and Sybert, JJ.

*Norman F. Summers,*with whom was *Julian S. Brewer, Jr.*on the brief, for appellant.

*Russell R. Reno, Jr., Assistant Attorney General,*with whom were *Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, William J. O’Donnell, State’s Attorney*and *Abraham Adler, Assistant State’s Attorney,*on the brief, for appellee.

PER Curiam.

The appellant was tried before Judge Jones, sitting without a jury, in the Criminal Court of Baltimore and was convicted of grand larceny—the theft of a second hand automobile from a dealer on whose lot it had been standing. On the day of this trial he also pleaded guilty to a charge of petty larceny— the theft of an automobile operator’s license. He appeals from this conviction on the charge of grand larceny, but not from the conviction on the other. He asserts that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction.

A review of the evidence satisfies us that it was sufficient to support the trial judge’s finding the appellant guilty. The ownership of the car, the fact that it was stolen, and its value (well in excess of $100) were all clearly and directly proven. The stolen car was found at a paint shop where it was taken within a day or two after it had been stolen. There was evidence that it had been brought there by the defendant to be repainted. It was also shown that he had bought another car which had neither motor nor transmission in it shortly before the theft, that he used the license plates from that “junk” car on the stolen car, that he had an invalid temporary permit for such use, that he had used a false name both on that permit and on the transfer of title which he received on the “junk” car (the name being that of the person to whom the stolen operator's license had been issued), and that he had stolen and forged a certificate of insurance relating to the “junk” car. There was, in addition, evidence that the appellant had looked *108at the stolen Plymouth car while it was on the lot of the dealer which owned it. The appellant told a story of having bought the car from two other young men, both of whom he described to the police, but neither of whom could be found. The trial judge was under no obligation to believe the story of the appellant, and his admitted falsifications certainly presented no persuasive reason in favor of her doing so. Even if others may have been involved in the theft, this would not absolve the appellant if he participated in it.

It hardly needs restatement that the possession of personal property recently stolen creates a presumption of fact that the possessor was the thief. *Bell v. State,*220 Md. 75, 150 A. 2d 908; *Oden v. State,*223 Md. 244, 246, 164 A. 2d 284; and *Ponder v. State,*227 Md. 570, 572, 177 A. 2d 839.

*Judgment affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 115 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 115

 Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 
920) to extend the emergency unemployment compensation program, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 1993

 Mr. Moakley submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 
920) to extend the emergency unemployment compensation program, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House, any rule of the House to the contrary 
notwithstanding, a motion to take from the Speaker's table the bill 
(H.R. 920) to extend the emergency unemployment compensation program, 
and for other purposes, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to 
concur in the Senate amendment. The Senate amendment shall be 
considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Ways and Means or their respective designees. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to final 
adoption without intervening motion. The motion shall be divided for a 
separate vote on concurring in section 7 of the Senate amendment, any 
rule of the House to the contrary notwithstanding.

                                 <all>
```
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Richard H. PRITIKIN, Respondent.

No. 40857.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 23, 1972.

Arthur N. Sheppard, Miami Beach, and Norman A. Faulkner, Tallahassee, for complainant.

Richard H. Pritikin, pro se.

*139PER CURIAM.

On September 25, 1968, this Court suspended respondent Richard H. Pritikin, a member of The Florida Bar, for a period of three years, and thereafter until rehabilitation was demonstrated. After the announcement of this decision in 214 So.2d 482 (Fla.1968), another complaint against respondent, arising out of the same general scheme or transaction, came on for hearing. Now the referee has recommended an additional two-year suspension. The Florida Bar seeks to have more stringent penalties imposed.

After reviewing the record and hearing arguments, and noting that respondent has admitted the factual allegations relating to his misappropriation of escrow funds, we have concluded that a two-year suspension is appropriate. Because the offense currently under review is essentially linked factually and in time with the activity for which a three-year suspension has already been assigned, we hold that the additional two-year period should be considered as already having run concurrently with the time thus far served in suspension. Justification for this nunc pro tunc approach rests in part upon what we view as a tardy prosecution of this matter by The Florida Bar.

Respondent retains, of course, the burden of showing his rehabilitation in a proper proceeding, a burden compounded by this additional disciplinary measure. In passing, we note further that respondent’s debts arising out of this venture remain unsettled, as well as those brought to our attention in the first action in which he was a respondent. Satisfaction in full of these obligations is an obvious condition precedent to a showing of rehabilitation.

The recommendation of the referee is modified to the extent that the two-year additional suspension will be considered as already having been served. Respondent continues under suspension until rehabilitation has been shown. Costs of these proceedings in the amount of $317.87 are hereby assessed against him.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.