alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 178 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
  H. RES. 178

Referring the bill (H.R. 2196) for the relief of John W. Ruth, Sr., to 
     the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 1993

 Mr. Duncan submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Referring the bill (H.R. 2196) for the relief of John W. Ruth, Sr., to 
     the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.

    Resolved, That the bill (H.R. 2196) entitled ``A bill for the 
relief of John W. Ruth, Sr.'', now pending in the House of 
Representatives, together with all the accompanying papers, is referred 
to the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims 
pursuant to section 1492 of title 28, United States Code, for 
proceedings in accordance with section 2509 of such title.

                                 <all>
```
# CA2004187EN.01000101.xml

| 22.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 187/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 187/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
#### Lorenzo Douglas REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1-276.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Oct. 31, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 4, 1967.

*27Lorenzo Douglas Reed, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s postconviction motion to set aside a judgment of conviction and imposition of sentence on a charge of breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny.

The appellant and a codefendant were charged with the joint commission of said crime, together with another count charging a separate offense. In the trial court’s order denying the Rule One motion, it is stated that appellant pled guilty to the one charge while represented by the Public Defender’s Office. Appellant’s motion and briefs concede this representation, but claim that the plea of guilty was not voluntary because it was coerced by the knowledge that his codefendant had confessed; and, therefore, in those circumstances there was nothing else the appellant could do but confess.

Under the record before us, it is clear that the appellant’s plea of guilty was voluntary and was made in furtherance of a properly negotiated plea resulting in the abandonment of the other pending count by the State. Hield v. State, Fla.App. 4th, 201 So.2d 235, 1967; Busby v. Holman, 356 F.2d 75 (5th Cir. 1966).

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, TJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6311

RANDALL VAN YOUNG, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, District Judge. (CA-01-445-2) Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randall Van Young, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Randall Van Young appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Young v. Angelone , No. CA-01-445-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Huey RAMSEY et al. v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 54168.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 19, 1973.

In re: Continental Insurance Company applying for Certiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster. 286 So.2d 371.

Writ denied. The result is correct.

DIXON, J., is of the opinion the exclusionary clause (arising out of the use of automobile) has been improperly interpreted.
Exhibit 99.02
     FORM OF ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

MBNA AMERICA BANK, N.A.


MBNA MASTER CREDIT CARD TRUST II


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of MBNA
America Bank, N.A. (the "Bank"), as Servicer pursuant to the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated as of August 4, 1994 (the "Pooling and
Servicing Agreement") by and between the Bank and The Bank of New York,
as trustee, (the "Trustee") does hereby certify that:

         1.  The Bank is Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement.

         2.  The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this
Certificate to the Trustee.

         3.  This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.05 of
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

         4.  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the
twelve-month period ended June 30, 2002 was conducted under my
supervision.

         5.  Based on such review, the Servicer has, to my knowledge,
fully performed all its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement throughout such twelve-month period and no material default in
the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except
as set forth in paragraph 6 below.

         6.  The following is a description of each material default in
the performance of the Servicer's obligations under the provisions of
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement known to the undersigned to have
been made during such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature
of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to
remedy each such default and (iii) the current status of each such
default:

"None"


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
Certificate this 15th day of August 2002.



 						/s/Douglas O. Hart
						Name:    Douglas O. Hart
						Title:      Senior Executive Vice
President
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Pearson plc (the Company) for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Fallon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 3, 2017



/s/ John FallonJohn FallonChief Executive Officer
ex-10.31

   
 LOAN
 AGREEMENT
 October 26, 2020
  
 Rain Communications Corp. (the “Lender”) with an address at 1130 West Pender Street, Unit 820, Vancouver, BC V6E 4A4, advanced USD$40,000 (the “Principal Sum”) to Cell MedX Corp. (the “Borrower”) of 123 W. Nye Ln, Suite 446, Carson City, NV 89706. The Lender advanced the funds on October 26, 2020.
  
 The Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 6% per year (the “Interest”) calculated from October 26, 2020 (the “Effective Date”). The Borrower is liable for repayment of the Principal Sum, accrued Interest, and any additional costs that the Lender incurs in trying to collect the amount owed to him under the terms of this Loan Agreement.
  
 The Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.
  
 	 LENDER
	 BORROWER

	 Rain Communications Corp.
	 Cell MedX Corp.

	  
	  

	 Per:
	 Per:

	  
	  

	  
	  

	 /s/ Raph Biggar
	 /s/  Yanika Silina

	 Raph Biggar, President
	 Yanika Silina, CFO


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
 PROMISSORY NOTE
  
 	 Principal Amount: USD$40,000
	 October 26, 2020


  
  
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED Cell MedX Corp., (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to the order of Rain Communications Corp. (the “Lender”) the sum of $40,000 lawful money of the United States of America (the “Principal Sum”) together with the Interest accrued on the Principal Sum calculated from October 26, 2020 (“Effective Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate as defined below.
  
 For the purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 6 per cent per year. Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective rate of 6.2% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.
  
 The Borrower may repay the Principal Sum, and the Interest in whole or in part at any time.
  
 The Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour of this promissory note.
  
  
 BORROWER
 Cell MedX Corp.
  
 Per:
  
  
 /s/ Yanika Silina
 Yanika Silina, CFO
April 29, 2015

Mr. Robert Wise

18150 NW Clamo Court

Portland, OR 97229

Dear Mr. Wise:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption / 

rulemaking from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can’t 

process your request, gives you some important information about how we have handled 

similar requests, and tells you what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can’t Process Your Request

We entered your March 30, 2015, exemption / rulemaking request into the public docket No. 

FAA-2015-0827, but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you 

sent doesn’t comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to 

consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption would 

provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an 

exemption.

 Any more information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

 The specific reasons you need to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside the 

United States, if applicable.
2

If We Don’t Hear From You

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days from the date of this letter, we will close the docket 

without further contact.

If you have any questions or need more time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

James M. Crotty

Manager, Aircraft and Airports Rules Division

Enclosure

§ 11.81
3

Project No.: AXX-xx-xxx-E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM-207:FShaver:xx/xx/xx:Doc#xxxx

ARM-1/200/207:Program Office [or specific OPR routing symbol]

[Insert Stylewriter Score Here]

[INSERT ENVELOPE ADDRESS HERE]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         981,269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,918,942
<ALLOWANCES>                                    58,681
<INVENTORY>                                  4,845,432
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,679,518
<PP&E>                                      65,858,158
<DEPRECIATION>                              25,921,785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,567,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,224,999
<BONDS>                                     21,582,425
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,577,000
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,920,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,567,062
<SALES>                                     15,175,646
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,289,459
<CGS>                                        4,657,045
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               40,047,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                20,587
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,490,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,751,835
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,012,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,739,835
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,547,601
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   309.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   309.52
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                           SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


                                 CERTIFICATION
          (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2001 of Golf Host Resorts, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on the date hereof
(the "Report") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I R. Keith Wilt, Vice President
& Treasurer of the Company, certify, that:

         1)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the company.


                                             /s/ R. Keith Wilt
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Name:  R. Keith Wilt
                                             Title: Vice President & Treasurer
                                                    (Principal Financial
                                                    Officer)
                                             Date:  October 29, 2002
# C_2020114EN.01001202.xml

| 6.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/12

---

Action brought on 6 February 2020 — Puma v EUIPO — CAMäleon (PUMA-System)

(Case T-71/20)

(2020/C 114/12)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: P. GonzálezBueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: CAMäleon Produktionsautomatisierung GmbH (Dettenhausen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark PUMA-System — Application for registration No 16 786 907

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 November 2019 in Case R 404/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

| — | Breach of the principle of sound administration; |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of the principle of sound administration;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b), Article 94 and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b), Article 94 and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# C_2020191EN.01002802.xml

| 8.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/28

---

Action brought on 23 March 2020 — Henry Cotton’s Brand Management Company v EUIPO — Industries Sportswear Company (Henry Cotton’s)

(Case T-173/20)

(2020/C 191/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Henry Cotton’s Brand Management Company Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl, C. Eckhartt and P. Böhner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Industries Sportswear Company SRL (Venice, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark Henry Cotton’s — European Union trade mark No 821 769 and No 2 580 728

Procedure before EUIPO: Revocation of register entry

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2020 in Joined Cases R 254/2019-2 and R 255/2019-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, if it should intervene in these proceedings, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, if it should intervene in these proceedings, to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 103(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 103(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 27(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 27(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Tank

with

Catalyst 

Tank

Distillation Kettle

Reactant 1 Reactant 2

Crude 

Excess Reactant

Package

Product Filter

Condenser

Recycled

Reactant 

System

Scrubber 

System

Filter
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          64,432
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  255,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,458
<INVENTORY>                                     23,659
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               345,690
<PP&E>                                       3,317,132
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,094,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,661,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          421,204
<BONDS>                                        677,414
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       488,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (20,631)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,661,823
<SALES>                                        533,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               533,230
<CGS>                                          176,182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  358,388
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   226
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                152,605
<INCOME-TAX>                                    54,525
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             98,080
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    98,080
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey L. Wright, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of G&K Services, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this quarterly report; and

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      quarterly report.

Date: May 6, 2004

                             By: /s/ Jeffrey L. Wright
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Jeffrey L. Wright, Senior Vice President,
                                Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
                                (Principal Financial Officer)


                                                                              25