alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

April 9th, 2007

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Great Basin Gold Ltd. (the
      "Company")
|--- | -------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                 
|    | Consent of Expert                          

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Annual Report) to
be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC). The Annual Report incorporates by reference the Annual
Information Form of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006.

On behalf of GeoLogix MRC (Pty) Ltd. (GeoLogix), I hereby
consent to the use of my name and GeoLogixs name in connection with reference
to my and GeoLogixs involvement in the preparation of the technical reports
entitled Technical Report on the Feasibility Study for the Burnstone Gold
Project and Technical report on the Resource Estimate on the Burnstone
Property, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa (the "Technical Reports") and to
references to the Technical Reports, or portions thereof, in the Annual Report
and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the information derived
from the Technical Reports in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

GeoLogix MRC (Pty) Ltd.

/s/ Deon van der Heever

Deon van der Heever

---
April 29, 2015

Mr. Michael H. LaMee

Chief of Training & Standardization

209 State Highway 121 bypass

Lewisville, TX 75067

Dear Mr. LaMee:

This letter is to inform you that we have received and begun processing your petition for 

exemption. It acknowledges receipt of the petition and describes how we will process it.

We Have the Petition

We have received your March 19, 2015, petition for an exemption from § 43.3(a) of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption, if granted, would allow properly trained 

medical personnel to perform the insertion and removal of litter systems, isolettes and secondary 

stretcher systems in the EC-135 and EC-155 aircraft operated by MED-Trans Corporation.

We have added your petition to the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0726) and we are processing 

it. We will contact you if we need additional information.

How We Will Process the Petition

A petition for an exemption, according to § 11.63(d), must be sent to the FAA at least 120 days 

before the proposed effective date of the exemption. In addition, we will publish a summary of 

the petition in the Federal Register for public comment.

We will advise you of the agency's final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions in the meantime, you may contact me at (202) 267-4713.

Sincerely,

/s/

Alphonso W. Pendergrass II

Transportation Industry Analyst

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division
# **EXHIBIT 32.1**

# ** **

# **Certification Pursuantto18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

I, Frederick Pevow, Chief Executive Officer (PrincipalExecutive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) of Gateway EnergyCorporation, certify that this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained herein fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Gateway Energy Corporation andits subsidiaries for the periods presented.

 

 

Date: May 12, 2011                                                           /s/Frederick M. Pevow                                                

                                                                                         Frederick M. Pevow

                                                                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                                                                         (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 185 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 185

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 26, 1993.
    Resolved, That Rob Portman of Ohio be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committees of the House of Representatives: the Committee on 
Government Operations and the Committee on Small Business.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
259 La. 705

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joe Bob PATTERSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51703.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1971.

In re: Joe Bob Patterson applying for certiorari, mandamus, prohibition and ha-beas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our supervisory or original jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. See dissent in State ex rel. Thompson v. Henderson, 258 La. 548, 246 So.2d 859.

DIXON, J.,

dissents from refusal. Boy-kin requires the record of the conviction disclose intelligent and informed waiver of constitutional rights. If Boykin had been followed in this case, the evidentiary hearing would not have been necessary.
**EXHIBIT 10.35**

** **

**Summary of Director Compensation Arrangements**

 

We currently pay eachdirector who is not employed by us or any of our affiliates (i.e., all of ourdirectors except for our Chairman, Frank F. Khulusi) a quarterly retainer of$7,000, plus $2,500 for each regular board meeting attended in person ortelephonically, $1,000 for each special board meeting attended in person ortelephonically and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended in person ortelephonically. We also pay the chairperson of the Audit Committee of our Boardof Directors an additional quarterly retainer of $3,125 and the chairperson ofthe Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors an additional quarterlyretainer of $1,250 for serving in such capacities. Directors who are employedby us or any of our affiliates are not paid any additional compensation fortheir service on our Board of Directors. We reimburse each of our directors forreasonable out-of-pocket expenses that they incur in connection with attendingboard or committee meetings. We have entered into indemnification agreements, aform of which is attached as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2008, with each of our directors.

 

Our directors are alsoeligible to participate in our 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, which isadministered by our Compensation Committee under authority delegated by ourBoard of Directors. The terms and conditions of option and stock bonus grantsto our non-employee directors under our 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended,are determined in the discretion of our Compensation Committee, and must beconsistent with the terms of the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, whichis filed as an exhibit to the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

The compensationarrangements we have with our directors are reviewed and may be modified fromtime to time by our Board of Directors.

 

Additional informationregarding our compensation arrangements with our directors will be included inour definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with our 2009 AnnualMeeting of Stockholders.

 

----
H. Res. 110

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

March 3, 1993.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

they are hereby, elected to the following standing committee

of the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON BUDGET: Glen Browder, Alabama; Lynn

C. Woolsey, California.

Attest:

Clerk.
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



 
 

Exhibit 10.1    
  


 
 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT    
  


The
Board of Directors

BakBone Software Incorporated: 


    We
consent to the inclusion of our report dated June 22, 2001, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of BakBone Software Incorporated as of March 31, 2001 and
April 30, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations and accumulated deficit and cash flows for the eleven months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended
April 30, 2000, which report appears in the registration statement on Form 20-F of BakBone Software Incorporated. 



	 	 	/s/ KPMG LLP
	 	 	 
	San Diego, California

July 11, 2001	 	 




1









QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000040643
<NAME>                        FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               0               
<CASH>                        861
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 19,516
<ALLOWANCES>                  2,500
<INVENTORY>                   20,064
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              42,518
<PP&E>                        22,430
<DEPRECIATION>                13,104
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                79,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         7,630
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      1,436
<OTHER-SE>                    45,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  79,032
<SALES>                       24,874
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              24,874
<CGS>                         14,538
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 11,121
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              156
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            341
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,126)
<INCOME-TAX>                  (473)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (653)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (653)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.17)

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 99.17**

 

**CONSENT OF KARLIS JANSONS**

** **

March 20, 2012

 

Brigus Gold Corp.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

 

**Re: Brigus Gold Corp.**

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

I hereby consent to (i) the use of my name in connection withthe following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F forthe year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 40-F”) of Brigus Gold Corp. (the “Company”) to which this consentrelates: (A) the technical report entitled “Black Fox Project National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report” dated January6, 2011 (the “Report”), (B) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2011 and (C)the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2011, (ii) the inclusion or incorporationby reference of information derived from the Report in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-113889, 333-162558and 333-167757), as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and ExchangeCommission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, orto any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporatedby reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.

 

Sincerely,
Factor File Layout 

Ginnie I Pools -- One Record per Pool 

Item Data Item Begin End Type Length Remarks

1 Pool Number 1 6 Character 6 X(6)

2 Pool Indicator 7 7 Character 1 X

3 Issuer Number 8 11 Numeric 4 9(4)

4 Filler 12 12 Character 1 X

5 Issuer Name 13 72 Character 60 X(60)

6 Original Aggregate Amount 73 87 Numeric 15 9(13)v9(2)

7 Remaining Security RPB 88 102 Numeric 15 9(13)v9(2)

8 RPB Factor 103 111 Numeric 9 9(1)v9(8)

9 Pool Interest Rate 112 116 Numeric 5 9(2)v9(3)

10 Pool Type 117 118 Character 2 X(2)

11 Pool Issue Date (MMDDYY) 119 124 Numeric 6 9(6)

12 Pool Maturity Date (MMDDYY) 125 130 Numeric 6 9(6)

13 Filler 131 162 Character 32 X(32)

14 CUSIP Number 163 171 Character 9 X(9)

Length of Record 171
#### Cecil Ray STOUT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. Q-498.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 15, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Apollo Gold Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/R. David
      RussellR.  David
      RussellPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerMarch
      25, 2009/s/Melvyn
      WilliamsMelvyn
      WilliamsChief
      Financial Officer and Senior VicePresident-Finance
      and Corporate DevelopmentMarch
      25, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 224 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 224

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that 
     signatures on discharge petitions be made public immediately.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 1993

 Mr. Bartlett of Maryland (for himself, Mr. Hoke, Mr. Huffington, Mr. 
  Miller of Florida, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. Kim, Mr. 
  Barton of Texas, and Mr. Shays) submitted the following resolution; 
              which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that 
     signatures on discharge petitions be made public immediately.

    Resolved, That the first undesignated paragraph of clause 3 of rule 
XXVII of the Rules of the House of Representatives is amended by 
inserting after the third sentence the following new sentence: ``A 
current list of the names of all Members signing each such motion shall 
be made available by the Clerk for public inspection during normal 
working hours.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### HSBC Bank USA, as Successor in Interest to Marine Midland Bank, Respondent, v IPO, LLC, et al., Defendants, and Louis Shih, Appellant.

[735 NYS2d 531]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered December 13, 2000, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint and directed judgment in its favor in the amount of $1,449,802.85 plus interest, costs and fees, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

Plaintiff sues on a defaulted loan initially negotiated in 1997 and guaranteed unconditionally, by the individual defendants, in early 1998. Later that year the lending arrangement was substantially modified, without further mention of personal guaranties. The modification placed a greater obligation on the corporate debtor, and required plaintiff to apply the proceeds of amassed collateral to outstanding indebtedness on at least a weekly basis.

The existence of a properly executed loan and guaranties, which is normally sufficient for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint on an instrument for the payment of money only (CPLR 3213), is not contested. However, the prima facie case for such relief requires documentary evidence or an explanation of how the indebtedness is calculated, other than in the form of mere conclusory allegations *(First Am. Bank of N.Y. v L.V. Lowden, Inc.,*197 AD2d 774). Plaintiff failed to meet that burden.

There is also a triable issue of fact as to whether plaintiff properly marshaled and disposed of the collateral in its possession in a “commercially reasonable” manner (UCC 9-504 [1]; *Transamerica Commercial Fin. Corp. v Matthews of Scotia,*178 AD2d 691, 694). This should have precluded accelerated judgment under CPLR 3213 *(Security Trust Co. of Rochester v Thomas,*59 AD2d 242), particularly in the absence of detailed facts and circumstances surrounding the sale *(Mack Fin. Corp. v Knoud,*98 AD2d 713). Concur — Williams, J.P., Saxe, Rosenberger, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.
---

Exhibit 13.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the annual report of Pacific Harbour Capital Ltd., (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas Pressello, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





"Thomas Pressello"





Name: Thomas Pressello

Title:   Chief Executive Officer

Date:   October 10, 2008





A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 20-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Lavoshae Wygal v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-00771-CR

Trial court case number: 1980566

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 10 of Harris County

On March 3, 2016, this case was abated and remanded to the trial court to conduct 

a hearing within 30 days of that order to determine whether, inter alia, the reporter’s 

record was lost or destroyed. On April 7, 2016, the reporter’s records were filed in this 

Court, and appear to be the complete reporter’s records for this case, making an 

abatement hearing no longer necessary. Because the clerk’s record was filed in this 

Court on October 6, 2015, the filing of the appellate record appears to be complete.

Accordingly, the Court sua sponte directs the Clerk of this Court to REINSTATE

this case on the Court’s active docket and to withdraw the Order of Abatement.

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the date of this 

order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 38.6(a)(2).

The State’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the date of 

the filing of appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 19, 2016
#### John Arthur FRITZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-127.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 20, 1969.

John Arthur Fritz, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
# L_2009051EN.01S00301.xml

| 24.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 51/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 51/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  registration  statements
(Nos. 333-90319 and 333-90313) on Form S-8 of CareAdvantage,  Inc. of our report
dated March 4, 2003 (with respect to Note G [1],  March 17, 2003),  on our audit
of the consolidated  financial  statements as of and for the year ended December
31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-KSB of CareAdvantage, Inc.


/s/ Eisner, LLP
----------------

Eisner, LLP
New York, NY
March 28, 2003
256 La. 851

#### Constance Emley CHAMBERS v. Acy Lee CHAMBERS.

No. 50851.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 30, 1970.

In re: Acy Lee Chambers applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 238 So.2d 30.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3358

JOHN F. GARD,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,

Respondent.

James L. Fuchs , Snider & Associates, LLC, of Ba ltimore, Maryland, argued for

petitioner.

Tara K. Hogan , Trial Attorney, Commercial Liti gation Branch, Civil Division,

United States Department of Ju stice, of Washington, DC, ar gued for respondent. With

her on the brief were Michael F. Hertz , Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E.

Davidson , Director, and Todd M. Hughes , Deputy Director.

Appealed from: Merit S ystems Protection BoardNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

*Honorable Ron Clark, District Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Texas, sitting by designation. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3358

JOHN F. GARD,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,

Respondent.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board

in CASE NO(S). DC12 21050518-W-4 and DC1 221060764-W-2

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LOURIE and RADER, Circuit Judges , and CLARK, District Judge ).*

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED August 6, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk