alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Vincent A. MANCUSO, Sr., et al. v. SIGMOR DISTRIBUTING SERVICE, INC.

No. 11727.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Dec. 28, 1977.

*1036Edward M. Leonard, Jr., Leonard & Hayes, Morgan City, for plaintiffs.

John E. Conery, Lippman, Hunter & Rawls, Franklin, for defendant.

Before LOTTINGER, EDWARDS and PONDER, JJ.

PONDER, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment dismissing their suit for eviction of a lessee on a motion for summary judgment.

The issue is the propriety of the granting of the summary judgment.

We affirm.

Plaintiffs’ father in 1971 leased to the defendant certain property. The lease contained the following paragraphs:

> “5. Use:

> Lessee shall have the right to make such improvements on said property as it shall deem necessary or desirable for the purpose of operating thereon a service station or filling station. Lessee agrees that it will not conduct therein any business in an unlawful manner, and that it will not permit any nuisance to be maintained upon the premises.

> “6. Purpose:

> It is further agreed that this lease is contingent upon Lessee legally being able to secure necessary permits to build and operate a service station on said property.”

Plaintiffs assert that defendants are violating the terms of the lease by selling package liquor and grocery items in addition to those normally associated with a “service station or filling station”; they point to the two paragraphs quoted above as restricting the operation on the leased premises. Defendants admit the sale of grocery items and package liquor. Thus there is no dispute as to material fact.

The trial court granted the motion for summary judgment on the ground that it is common knowledge that service stations sell more than gasoline and that the sale of grocery items, beer and package liquor does not violate the terms of the lease.

We prefer to base our decision on the latter ground. We interpret the first sentence of paragraph 5 of the lease to be a grant of authority to make specific improvements to the property; it does not contain a prohibition of other use of the premises. The second sentence contains the prohibitions against illegal activities and nuisances only. Paragraph 6 contains protection for the lessee should there be a bar against the proposed primary purpose of the lease. It contains no limitation to service station use only.

Had it been intended that the premises be restricted to only service station use a simple unambiguous statement to that effect would have been easily incorporated in the lease. Instead, grocery items had been sold prior to the lessor’s death and beer and liquor prior to the death of Mrs. Mancuso, all without objection.

The judgment is affirmed at appellants’ costs.

AFFIRMED.
| (1)   | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period      ending March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of MedClean Technologies,      Inc. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 17, 2010       |   | /s/      David      Laky     |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                                                        |   | David      Laky              |   |
|                                                        |   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|                                                        |   |                         |   |

----
- 12 -

Table 3

(Revised with technical corrections for “Best Days 2007-2011” and “Visibility Change” for Best Days)

Statewide 2018 Reasonable Progress Goal Summary

IMPROVE 

Monitor California Class I Area(s)

Best Days 

Baseline 

(dv)

Best Days 

(2007-2011) 

(dv)

Visibility 

Change 

(dv)

Worst Days 

Baseline 

(dv)

Worst Days 

(2007-2011) 

(dv)

Visibility 

Change 

(dv)

2018 

RPG

(dv)

Progress to 

2018 RPG

by 2011

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

TRIN Marble Mountain W.

Yolla Bolly-Middle Eel W. 3.4 3.0 0.4 17.4 15.2 2.1 16.4 210%

LABE Lava Beds N.M.

South Warner W. 3.2 2.9 0.3 15.1 13.0 2.1 14.4 300%

LAVO

Lassen Volcanic N.P.

Caribou W.

Thousand Lakes W.

2.7 2.3 0.4 14.1 15.6 -1.5 13.3 -188%

SIERRA CALIFORNIA

BLIS Desolation W.

Mokelumne W. 2.5 2.1 0.4 12.6 13.0 -0.4 12.3 -133%

HOOV Hoover W. 1.4 1.3 0.1 12.9 11.5 1.4 12.5 350%

YOSE Yosemite N.P.

Emigrant W. 3.4 2.5 0.9 17.6 16.0 1.6 16.7 178%

KAIS

Ansel Adams W.

Kaiser W.

John Muir W.

2.3 1.5 0.8 15.5 14.9 0.6 14.9 100%

SEQU Sequoia N.P.

Kings Canyon N.P. 8.8 7.6 1.2 25.4 22.3 3.1 22.7 115%

DOME Dome Lands W. 5.1 4.9 0.2 19.4 18.3 1.1 18.1 85%

COASTAL CALIFORNIA

REDW Redwood N.P. 6.1 5.8 0.3 18.5 18.5 0 17.8 0%

PORE Point Reyes N.S. 10.5 8.6 1.9 22.8 21.6 1.2 21.3 80%

PINN Pinnacles W.

Ventana W. 8.9 7.8 1.1 18.5 17.5 1.0 16.7 56%

RAFA San Rafael W. 6.4 5.2 1.2 18.8 18.0 0.8 17.3 53%

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

SAGA San Gabriel W.

Cucamonga W. 4.8 4.5

(2005-2008) 0.3 19.9 18.0(2005-2008) 1.9 17.4 76% by 2008

SAGO San Gorgonio W.

San Jacinto W. 5.4 4.0 1.4 22.2 18.7 3.5 19.9 152%

AGTI Agua Tibia W. 9.6 7.1 2.5 23.5 19.8 3.7 21.6 195%

JOSH Joshua Tree N.P. 6.1 4.8 1.3 19.6 16.1 3.5 17.9 206%

W = Wilderness N.M. = National Monument N.P. = National Park N.S. = National Seashore
### - 

## 12

- Table 3

(Revised with technical corrections for “Best Days 2007

- 20 11 ” and “Visibility Change” for Best Days)

Statewide 2018 Reasonable Progress Goal Summary

IMPROVE

Monitor California Class I Area(s) Best Days

Baseline

(dv) Best Days

(2007

- 2011)

(dv) Visibility

Change

(dv) Worst Days

Baseline

(dv) Worst Days

(2007

- 2011)

(dv) Visibility

Change

(dv) 2018

RPG

(dv) Progress to

2018 RPG

by 2011

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

TRIN Marble Mountain W.

Yolla Bolly

- Middle Eel W. 3.4 3.0 0.4 17.4 15.2 2.1 16.4 210%

LABE Lava Beds N.M.

South Warner W. 3.2 2.9 0.3 15.1 13.0 2.1 14.4 300%

LAVO Lassen Volcanic N.P.

Caribou W.

Thousand Lakes W. 2.7 2.3 0.4 14.1 15.6

- 1.5 13.3

- 188%



### SIERRA CALIFORNIA

BLIS Desolation W.

Mokelumne W. 2.5 2.1 0.4 12.6 13.0

- 0.4 12.3

- 133%

HOOV Hoover W. 1.4 1.3 0.1 12.9 11.5 1.4 12.5 350%

YOSE Yosemite N.P.

Emigrant W. 3.4 2.5 0.9 17.6 16.0 1.6 16.7 178%

KAIS Ansel Adams W.

Kaiser W.

John Muir W. 2.3 1.5 0.8 15.5 14.9 0.6 14.9 100%

SEQU Sequoia N.P.

Kings Canyon N.P. 8.8 7.6 1.2 25.4 22.3 3.1 22.7 115%

DOME Dome Lands W. 5.1 4.9 0.2 19.4 18.3 1.1 18.1 85%



### COASTAL CALIFORNIA

REDW Redwood N.P. 6.1 5.8 0.3 18.5 18.5 0 17.8 0%

PORE Point Reyes N.S. 10.5 8.6 1.9 22.8 21.6 1.2 21.3 80%

PINN Pinnacles W.

Ventana W. 8.9 7.8 1.1 18.5 17.5 1.0 16.7 56%

RAFA San Rafael W. 6.4 5.2 1.2 18.8 18.0 0.8 17.3 53%



### SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

SAGA San Gabriel W.

Cucamonga W. 4.8 4.5

(2005

- 2008) 0.3 19.9 18.0

**(2005**

**- 2008)**  1.9 17.4 76% by 2008

SAGO San Gorgonio W.

San Jacinto W. 5.4 4.0 1.4 22.2 18.7 3.5 19.9 152%

AGTI Agua Tibia W. 9.6 7.1 2.5 23.5 19.8 3.7 21.6 195%

JOSH Joshua Tree N.P. 6.1 4.8 1.3 19.6 16.1 3.5 17.9 206%



### W = Wilderness N.M. = National Monument N.P. = National Park N.S. = National Seashore
# C_2019187EN.01008001.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/80

---

Action brought on 8 April 2019 — SJ v Commission

(Case T-701/18)

(2019/C 187/86)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: SJ (represented by: J. MacGuill, Solicitor and E. Martin-Vignerte, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the European Commission’s refusal to grant access to documents under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 (1), taken by confirmatory decision C(2018) 6642 final of 4 October 2018, and notified to the applicant on 8 October 2018; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the European Commission’s refusal to grant access to documents under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 (1), taken by confirmatory decision C(2018) 6642 final of 4 October 2018, and notified to the applicant on 8 October 2018;

| — | in relation to costs, order that each party should bear their own costs or that the defendant bear the applicant’s costs were the applicant to succeed. |
| --- | --- |

—

in relation to costs, order that each party should bear their own costs or that the defendant bear the applicant’s costs were the applicant to succeed.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that, by relying on the general presumption of non-disclosure, the defendant effectively shifted the burden of proof and afflicted the applicant with an impossible burden of proof to discharge, in contradiction with stated case-law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that, by relying on the general presumption of non-disclosure, the defendant effectively shifted the burden of proof and afflicted the applicant with an impossible burden of proof to discharge, in contradiction with stated case-law.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment regarding the existence of an overriding public interest, in breach of the principles of the relevant case-law. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment regarding the existence of an overriding public interest, in breach of the principles of the relevant case-law.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p.43).

---
MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET Meeting: SIA

f SE /11 1 M erA.'
( t PfiC SkillMeeting Date: Name (please print) --rdv; f:'rlt **~All{** w ILL.
t ,(\;v\ [vC.)(<. \ v Di v1 1-t ,_ **~ ~-~** ... , ,___ **2~** VI t' JJ **~1 [**  J' fl /vhcu: d **C~sf-o l'**  q 11 o \ - .

. .

. **~ ~** 

t \.\\" "'- "- IS--" 'r , - gl"l«V1
**~a Q._/**  J!=rr **11~...,;** ;To tV' \2_vj.\ **~~r~ ~·-**  **Sa~~~**

**Ci tT**  **K~ il~')**  sal] ds tvt A c-1 1\ **~** DnA c. hi· s J)} t/.V t/( Company E-Mail **f/1/ ~;J!r**  /(t} **/:LtS/~ir -rotU**  **tf4** G cv MP1.. 1 t: o 1-t **\tlt J\-1.-~**  (;Jt **~~~l.\M**
_ ,'V\C "'" e **C~ r'l'\~** **.**+ .c:."·M ( e **"'~'** tt 5 I/l.s

; I L-< .IW'

· v> cJt.j .:7 '-1...,
l - ?1--1 c. **t~,**

L **~** .-. .( **~**

),

. i .' t -t t.. rrj **.[';~,.,** '·" ,/v.;.. .... : c ) Phone ?CJl- **r~> ~-**  orfY. W 2 - **&. ~** x · Y '-iS Lf ..< **~-** e. ..;L 2L....:? 9 Y b ? .? :/ L - 9- <!-C

· I ?- t. 7 **ow** (f? e;t1r'ca / tvtCaS for C'/ 'l () G dov

, C t' 't1

. )0 o - J J 1- 7! ( () ,

\ 1

**~** rr

r

,

I

' **7~(_ \~~~~UM~<-L</'**  ?<J'L ITT **~fdj** GLo&.L rDUiuDR }5-s. & \ C{n
. **{t) ce** **~ sfck.tl-f~o~**  **~/)'\ s~g**  **-~2** 3 -!;;o Lf s JoJ:y

l EL.::ZfMtoJ **L,~ J<r}.**  **;Tc/'F,f,?,-..,/Jo~ Y);;.**  TEL Co,., f"Jz- **~2.'** -'jO<jz **~~C** 5I:Ml E ;1 ;t / o lfr/utJjtm FJ !?A I 0 fP -r/ ({ /) f3tlf )Off/ ):C C/

'
. / \_, . k. ,-yJ ((. 1\. . t' (''

' '\ I **~** ..;:::;.'-· '----

'

' _\..., ·- 'II'

' ?.d.

**5: ~** 7 · **'lSD** f::. "1ct 1i3 b1S7 sbo. **tj~** ® sem; .Of j 5qqJs. k'l·/yf\ **@~J'" VJZ~**  Sbl-j-6>'3 DOa.
- r f\AaJu tL{i, J t: pa , (f l l!J Z 5 {p **~** 61· ( 6 **I~** J f/ "'c.¥

· **CJu·~~ ~t=/11**  **"~tl** J.,/Jll..-- **f6l(-~?**
8Breakout Example of an Industrial Tool This is an example of a small semiconductor manu

f acturing tool There are hundreds of thousands of individual homogenous material layers in an industrial tool. Each would need to be verified as compliant through documentation (i.e. supplier declaration)
or testing

. Documentation and testing are likely to be absent or impossible for used equipment and extremely difficult for new equipment.131

**~ ~**  172-..,

, ?1 **~1 1--®**  I 110 **'~ 69~**  **8/ ~**  16 7
**35 ~**  160 ... - .

l **257~ 25** **1--r' ~**  N 250 l20 / 1 9

**ZS -f(**  **~** l:l/1 **~~1/J**

. -. ..... '. ' semiconductor I ,

. - **'~**

. **~ ~** 
**~ ~** 

! **~· il** 

I h ,,,,,, ./ **Jt..:. --**  **-_**

( •• ,, , .

' Semiconductor package Photo credit: Zephyris. Licensed under GNU Free Documentation Licen se. http s:/ /en.wiki pedia

. org/wiki/lntegrated_circuit#

/ media/File:Microchip

s. jpg
# Official Journal L 184/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.184.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 184 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5317 July 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.184.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 184

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5317 July 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 629/2010 of 16 July 2010 setting the final amount of aid for dried fodder for the 2009/2010 marketing year | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EU) No 630/2010 of 16 July 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 2 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EU) No 631/2010 of 16 July 2010 on the issue of licences for the import of garlic in the subperiod from 1 September 2010 to 30 November 2010 | 4 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2010/399/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 15 July 2010 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
  (notified under document C(2010) 4894) | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 629/2010 of 16 July 2010 setting the final amount of aid for dried fodder for the 2009/2010 marketing year

1

Commission Regulation (EU) No 630/2010 of 16 July 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

2

Commission Regulation (EU) No 631/2010 of 16 July 2010 on the issue of licences for the import of garlic in the subperiod from 1 September 2010 to 30 November 2010

4

DECISIONS

2010/399/EU

*

Commission Decision of 15 July 2010 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
  (notified under document C(2010) 4894)

(notified under document C(2010) 4894)

6

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

I N RE: GECU,

Relator. § § § § § § No. 08-11-00139- CV

AN ORI GI

NAL PROCEEDI

NG
I N MANDA MUS

MEMORAN DUM OP INION ON P ETIT ION F OR WRIT OF M ANDAM US Relator, GECU, asks this Court to issue a writ of m an d amus ag ainst the Honora ble
L inda Y. Chew, J udg e of the 327th D istrict Court of El Paso County

. To be entitled to ma ndamus relief , a rela tor must meet two require ments. First, the rela tor must show that the trial court clea rly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W .3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the re lator must demonstrate that ther e is no adequate reme dy by appea l. Id. at 136. Ba sed on the

rec ord befor e us, we conclude that Relator is not entitled to m an d am u s relief. Acc ording ly , the petition is denied. See T E X .R.A P P .P. 52.8(a).

J une 15, 2011 ANN CRAWFORD McCL URE, J ustice
Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ

. Chew, C.J ., not participating
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                    BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORPORATION
                            SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES


                                       State or Other
                                        Jurisdiction            Percentage of
                                      of Incorporation        Voting Securities
                                       or Organization              Owned    
                                      ----------------        -----------------

BCOP Nevada Company                        Nevada                   100.0

Boise Marketing Services, Inc.            Delaware                   88.0

Grand & Toy Limited                    Ontario, Canada              100.0

Jean-Paul Guisset-JPG S.A.                 France                   100.0

The Reliable Corporation                  Delaware                  100.0

Reliable Deutschland GmbH             Hamburg, Germany              100.0

Reliable France S.A.                       France                   100.0
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 
22, 1999, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of uBid, Inc. 
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Creative Computers, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1998.

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 333-848) pertaining to Creative Computers, Inc. of our report 
dated January 22, 1999, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of
uBid, Inc. incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of 
Creative Computers, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                               /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 29, 1999
# Official Journal C 404A/20 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 404A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6520 October 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 404A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6520 October 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2022/C 404 A/01 | Notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/401/22 – Administrators (AD 6) in the fields of energy, climate and environment | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2022/C 404 A/01

Notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/401/22 – Administrators (AD 6) in the fields of energy, climate and environment

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**EXHIBIT 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Frank F. Khulusi, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PCM, Inc.; and

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 
| Date:   April 30, 2013 | /s/   Frank F. Khulusi    |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                        | Frank   F. Khulusi        |
|                        | Chief   Executive Officer |

 

----
# Official Journal C 66/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 66 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 658 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 66

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 658 February 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 66/01 | Commission Notice – The 2022 annual Union work programme for European standardisation | 1 |
| 2022/C 66/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10432 – PTTGC / ALLNEX) (
  1
  ) | 25 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 66/01

Commission Notice – The 2022 annual Union work programme for European standardisation

1

2022/C 66/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10432 – PTTGC / ALLNEX) (
  1
  )

1

25

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 66/03 | Euro exchange rates — 7 February 2022 | 26 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2022/C 66/04 | Information note – Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items: Information on measures adopted by Member States in conformity with Articles 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 22 and 23 | 27 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 66/03

Euro exchange rates — 7 February 2022

26

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2022/C 66/04

Information note – Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items: Information on measures adopted by Member States in conformity with Articles 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 22 and 23

27

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 66/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10574 - ADVENT / CALDIC) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 61 |
| 2022/C 66/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10570 - ADVENT / PERMIRA / MCAFEE) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 63 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 66/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10574 - ADVENT / CALDIC) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

61

2022/C 66/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10570 - ADVENT / PERMIRA / MCAFEE) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

63

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN