alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Verizon California Inc.



EXHIBIT 12





COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|(Dollars in Millions)                                                                            |  | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |  | $                                   
|Interest expense                                                                                 |  |                                     
|Portion of rent expense representing interest                                                    |  |                                     
|Amortization of capitalized interest                                                             |  |                                     
|                                                                                                 |  |                                     
|Earnings, as adjusted                                                                            |  | $                                   
|                                                                                                 |  |                                     
|                                                                                                 | 
|Fixed charges:                                                                                   |  |                                     
|Interest expense                                                                                 |  | $                                   
|Portion of rent expense representing interest                                                    |  |                                     
|Capitalized interest                                                                             |  |                                     
|                                                                                                 |  |                                     
|Fixed charges                                                                                    |  | $                                   
|                                                                                                 |  |                                     
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                               |  |                                     
|                                                                                                 |  |
<PAGE>   1



Exhibit 12

                   GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY
        Statement of the Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                  (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in Millions)                                               Nine Months Ended
                                                                    September 30, 1998
                                                                    ------------------
<S>                                                                   <C>           
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income from continuing operations                                   $        527.5
  Add - Income taxes                                                           357.6
     - Fixed charges                                                           107.3
                                                                      --------------
Adjusted earnings                                                     $        992.4
                                                                      ==============

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                                    $         99.7 
  Portion of rent expense                                                      
     representing interest                                                       7.6
                                                                      --------------
Adjusted fixed charges                                                $        107.3
                                                                      ==============

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                              9.25
</TABLE>
#### GEORGE S. GRIMES v. ROBERT E. ARTHURS.1

April 28, 1916.

Nos. 19,708—(109).

Contract — evidence of performance.

Evidence was sufficient to sustain findings of fact that a contract to install a heating plant was substantially performed and that the failure of the plant to heat the building was due to its improper management. [Reporter.]

Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $500 for breach of £ contract to install a heating plant in a certain building. The case was tried before Montgomery, J., who when plaintiff rested denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the action, made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendant. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

Affirmed.

*Gordon Grimes,*for appellant.

*A. X. Schall, Jr.,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 157 N. W. 590.

Per Curiam.

Action for 'damages for the alleged breach of a contract to install a heating plant in a building owned by plaintiff. The trial below was before the court without a jury and, upon findings of fact, judgment was ordered for defendant. Plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial.

The substantial question presented by the assignments of error is whether the findings of the court are sustained by the evidence. It appears that the contract was entered into some time in August, 1911, and provided for the installation of the heating plant in accordance with certain plans and specifications; and as a part of the transaction defendant represented that when so installed the plant would suitably heat the building in cold weather. The contract was performed, and plaintiff took possession of the building and continued the use of the heating plant during the years of 1911, 1912 and the winter of 1913-1914. The court found that there was a substantial performance of the contract, and, though plaintiff’s tenants experienced some difficulty in heating the building, that the cause thereof was the improper and careless management of the plant, whereby ashes were permitted to accumulate in the ash box, the grates were burned out or welded together, and other acts of improper attention to the fire. The court further found that *477plaintiff made no request or demand of defendant to remedy any defects in the plant, and late in the fall of 1914, without notice to defendant, removed the boiler attachment of the plant and installed a new one at a cost of $350.36.

Our examination of the record discloses evidence reasonably tending to support both questions passed upon by the trial court, namely, that defendant substantially performed his contract, and that the failure of the plant to heat the building was due to improper management of the same, and within the rule guiding this court there must be an affirmance. While the evidence tending to support the findings is far from conclusive, it is sufficient that it reasonably tends to support them. In view of this conclusion it becomes unnecessary to consider the question of the measure of damages.

Order affirmed.
# Official Journal C 313/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 313 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 664 September 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 313

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 664 September 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 313/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10885 – TRIVIUM / TCHIBO) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2023/C 313/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10890 – MARCEGAGLIA STEEL / OLPUK / OSB / FSAB) (
  1
  ) | 2 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 313/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10885 – TRIVIUM / TCHIBO) (
  1
  )

1

1

2023/C 313/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10890 – MARCEGAGLIA STEEL / OLPUK / OSB / FSAB) (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 313/03 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 4,25 % on 1 September 2023 – Euro exchange rates | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 313/03

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 4,25 % on 1 September 2023 – Euro exchange rates

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 313/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11263 – EF EXCLUSIVE CARS / FG AUTOMOBIL HOLDING / FG EXCLUSIVE CARS JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2023/C 313/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11263 – EF EXCLUSIVE CARS / FG AUTOMOBIL HOLDING / FG EXCLUSIVE CARS JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24 - 0300 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JAMIE LYNN STONE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until July 2 9 , 2024, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court June 20 2024

06/20/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0300
**EXHIBIT 99.20**

 

**CONSENT OF DAN MACKIE**

** **

March 27, 2013

 

Brigus Gold Corp.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

 

**Re: Brigus Gold Corp.**

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

I hereby consent to (i) the use of my name in connection withthe following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F forthe year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Form 40-F”) of Brigus Gold Corp. (the “Company”) to which this consentrelates: (A) the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report, Pre-feasibility Study, Brigus Gold Corp., GoldfieldsProject, Saskatchewan, Canada” dated effective October 6, 2011 (the “Report”), (B) the Company’s AnnualInformation Form for the year ended December 31, 2012 and (C) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis forthe year ended December 31, 2012, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report in theRegistration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-113889, 333-162558 and 333-167757), as amended, and Form F-10 (File No. 333-174604),as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commissionpursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectusesor amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference inthe above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.
#### Theodore R. ROBBINS and Edmondo Jarquin, d/b/a Robbins-Jarquin, Appellants, v. Arnold WILPON and Faye Wilpon, his wife, Appellees.

No. 71-331.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 21, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 20, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010
(the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/  Gerald D. KelferGerald D. KelferPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Henry CAGE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 53863.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 14, 1973.

In re: Henry Cage applying for certio-rari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The trial court has by order dated August 31, 1973 set a hearing in this matter on October 15, 1973.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION of CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT to SECTION 1350 of CHAPTER 63 of TITLE 18 of the UNITED STATES CODE,

as ADOPTED PURSUANT to

SECTION 906 of THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Frischs Restaurants, Inc. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 9, 2010 (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Registrant certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |     |  |                           
|------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------
|April 5, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Donald H. Walker      
|              |  |     |  | Donald H. Walker          
|              |  |     |  | Vice President-Finance and
|              |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer   

This certification is being
furnished as required by Rule 13a  14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as other
otherwise stated in such filing.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-152-CV

IN RE LANCE GARLAND MANTOOTH	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL  A:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and HOLMAN, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  April 21, 2008
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

                            [FRESENIUS MEDICAL LOGO]


June 20, 2003


Mr. Michael Brosnan
Fresenius Medical Care North America

Dear Mike:

The purpose of this letter is to outline your revised retention plan. This
supersedes the retention plan offered to you and accepted in September 2002.

In addition to the two payments you have already received, you will be eligible
to receive a total retention bonus of $180,000. This retention bonus would be
paid to you in two parts: $65,000 in October 2003 and $115,000 in June 2004. The
payments are contingent on your continued employment through June 2004.

Please indicate your acceptance of this retention bonus by signing below and
returning a copy of this letter to Brian O'Connell in Human Resources.

As with any compensation plan, this retention bonus is confidential. If you have
any questions, please discuss them with only Brian O'Connell or me.

Thank you for your consistent hard work and support. I look forward to
continuing our strong working relationship as we face the many challenges ahead.

Sincerely,



Ben Lipps
President and
Chief Executive Officer


                  ACCEPT:

                  /s/Michael Brosnan                                   6/24/03
                  ------------------                                   -------
                  Michael Brosnan                                      Date

Cc:  B. O'Connell
# Official Journal C 216/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 216 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5014 September 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 216

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5014 September 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | OPINIONS |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2007/C 216/01 | Opinion No 4/2007 on a draft Commission Regulation (EC) amending Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004 on a standard financial regulation for the executive agencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes [SEC(2007) 492 Final] | 1 |
| 2007/C 216/02 | Opinion No 6/2007 on the annual summaries of Member States; ‘national declarations’ of Member States; and audit work on EU funds of national audit bodies | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

OPINIONS

Court of Auditors

2007/C 216/01

Opinion No 4/2007 on a draft Commission Regulation (EC) amending Regulation (EC) No 1653/2004 on a standard financial regulation for the executive agencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes [SEC(2007) 492 Final]

1

2007/C 216/02

Opinion No 6/2007 on the annual summaries of Member States; ‘national declarations’ of Member States; and audit work on EU funds of national audit bodies

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 256 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 256

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to preclude the 
    Committee on Rules from reporting any rule or order waiving the 
     applicability of the germaneness requirement to any emergency 
           supplemental appropriation for a natural disaster.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 23, 1993

 Mr. Talent submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to preclude the 
    Committee on Rules from reporting any rule or order waiving the 
     applicability of the germaneness requirement to any emergency 
           supplemental appropriation for a natural disaster.

    Resolved, That the last sentence of clause 4(b) of rule XI of the 
Rules of the House of Representatives is amended by inserting before 
the period the following: ``; nor shall it report any rule or order 
waiving the applicability of clause 7 of rule XVI (respecting germane 
amendments) to any emergency supplemental appropriation for a natural 
disaster''.

                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 24, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 24, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17I0170. YA VAN v. SIV CHENG KONG AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE 

OF CHHENG VOIGT, DECEASED et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

16C03207
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 185

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 26, 1993

Mr. MICHEL submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That Rob Portman of Ohio be, and is here2 by, elected to the following standing committees of the

3 House of Representatives: the Committee on Government

4 Operations and the Committee on Small Business.

Æ
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

NELSON SIGFREDO HERNANDEZMENA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-681

[May 6, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Caroline Shepherd, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2017-CF007880-AXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Timothy Wang, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessica L. 

Underwood, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### In re the Marriage of Nivia Rojas CRUZ, Appellant, v. Ello CRUZ, Appellee.

No. 74-33.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 26, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21

- 045 6 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. NEIL LYNN NUNES,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Julie Pesanti DeLong is granted an extension of time to and including November 21 , 202 2 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 20 2022

10/20/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0456