alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Tommy Lee WILLIAMS, Appellee.

No. II-221.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 8, 1978.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.

BOYER, Judge.

The trial court granted the appellee’s (hereafter, defendant) motion to suppress certain inculpatory statements. The State appeals.

The testimony at the hearing on the motion to suppress revealed that prior to any questioning the defendant was fully advised of his constitutional rights and he signed a waiver of those rights. He was then questioned concerning his knowledge of certain forged checks, which allegedly reflected his name as the payee and the endorser. Initially, he denied any involvement with, or knowledge of, the forged checks.

After the police officer advised the defendant to tell the truth in light of the overwhelming existing and potential incriminating evidence, he informed the officer that he was afraid of the consequences of any admission of guilt because he was currently on parole. The officer testified that he then informed the defendant that *if contacted by the parole commission,*the *1095only thing he could do was tell the truth concerning the defendant’s cooperation or lack of it in the investigation. He denied making any promises to the defendant concerning his parole and denied making any promises concerning any recommendations on behalf of the defendant. The defendant subsequently confessed. The trial court found the officer’s statement constituted an implied promise under *Fillinger v. State,*349 So.2d 714 (Fla.2d DCA 1977) and thus the confession was not given freely and voluntarily.

In *Fillinger v. State,*supra, the officer promised that if the defendant cooperated in the case, he would advise the State Attorney and that her cooperation would be considered in the case. In addition, the officer stated her cooperation would be considered in setting her bond. From those statements, a promise of leniency was inferred. We need not here decide whether, under the same circumstances, we would go so far as did our sister court in the *Fillinger*case, because the facts sub judice are materially different.

We do not find that the officer’s statement in this case constituted an implied promise of leniency which would vitiate the otherwise voluntary confession. The officer expressly stated he could make no promises to the defendant. A promise of leniency could not be inferred from the officer’s statement that he would advise the parole officer of the defendant’s cooperation if contacted by “the parole people.” (See *State v. Mullin,*286 So.2d 36 (Fla.3d DCA 1973).)

Accordingly, the learned trial judge erred when he entered the order of suppression here appealed.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.

McCORD, C. J., and MELVIN, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<S>    <C>          <C>
                                          For the three months
                                          ended March 31, 1997 
                                          1997         1996
Net (loss) income                           ($694)     ($2,229)     
Shares:
Weighted average number of shares
 of common stock outstanding              3,804,085    3,761,315
Shares assumed issued (less
 shares purchased for
 treasury) on stock option
 agreements                                   2,559        2,559
Rounding                                        356           70
                                          3,807,000    3,765,000
Net (loss) income per Common Share           $(0.18)      $(0.59)

</TABLE>
Verizon California Inc.



EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Verizon California Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of
the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods presented in the Report.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Dated: November 12, 2003 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    LAWRENCE T. BABBIO, JR.Lawrence T. Babbio, Jr. Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  |  | 
|Dated: November 12, 2003 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN F. KILLIANJohn F. Killian Chief Financial Officer                                          



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Verizon California Inc. and will be retained by Verizon California Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23(a)


           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of our
report dated January 22, 1997, included in Northern Border
Partners, L.P.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1996 and to all references to our Firm included in
this Registration Statement.




                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Omaha, Nebraska,
June 27, 1997
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of SCOLR Pharma, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gail T. Vitulli, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|    |  |                                                               
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /S/    GAIL T.
VITULLI                                        
|    |  | Gail T. Vitulli Principal Financial Officer SCOLR Pharma, Inc.



Date:
March 29, 2005
## -.. ..,. I.:

## . . .

: . . . _” :

. . .: ‘ . . . . ., .., . . ,$C ‘ .~. _. : .


## :. . ..

.

. _- . .:: I~’ .~ .., ‘ :, 8
:,, : i
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Foster SHIVER v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53862.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 14, 1973.

In re: Foster Shiver applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and other remedial writs.

Denied. The application showed on its face that applicant is not entitled to the relief sought.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Herbert J. WILLIAMS, Jr. v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 54229.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 4, 1974.

In re: Herbert J. Wiliams, Jr. applying for Writ of Mandamus.

Application for mandamus denied, since the trial judge has acted on the habeas corpus application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       5,054,366
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               41,474,676
<ALLOWANCES>                                   225,000
<INVENTORY>                                 53,993,681
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           102,498,654
<PP&E>                                       8,727,341
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,092,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             107,595,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,408,072
<BONDS>                                     29,054,928
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        88,172
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,043,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               107,595,061
<SALES>                                    225,900,182
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           225,900,182
<CGS>                                      197,529,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              207,546,354
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,423,914
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,929,914
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,773,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,156,914
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,156,914
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12


</TABLE>
New Heights Aerial Media

David L . Farley 2400 Amara Dr Toledo, OH 43617 (419)754

- 7236 dfarley@newheightsaerialmedia.com Date: October 20, 2015 U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management Sy stem 1200 New Jersey

Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 Addendum Request to Exemption No. 11358 To Whom It May

Concern: New Heights Aerial Media requests that the Tarot 650 UAS be added to Exemption No. 11358 and COA No. FAA

- 2014

- 1110

- 333E
. The Tarot 650 gross weight is approxim ately 5.5lbs. with battery

and payload. The payload will be a camera gimble and an HD Camera. The Tarot 650 has a preset GeoFence that will not allow the aircraft to fl y out of. The Presets are 200ft AGL altitude and a distance horizontally of 400ft. In the event of signal loss from the ground controller, the aircraft will return to its takeoff point if the aircraft has a good GPS L ock. If there is no GPS lock, the aircraft will land at its present position. The Tarot 650 utilizes the same Pixhawk flight controller as our previously approved Iris+. The check list and flight manual from the Iris+ with be used for the Tarot 650 operations. The Tarot 650 will be operated within the parameters set forth by Exemption No: 11358 and COA No. FAA

- 2014

- 1110

- 333E unless an additional COA is is sued for the Tarot 650 Thank You for your Consideration David Farley New Heights Aerial Media **1jz -**  **8iec -**  **8x0j**
#### ALEXANDER B. CRAWFORD *vs.*RICHARD WRIGHT.

Upon a distress for rent, and replevin, the value of the rent *in kind*may be found by the jury; and it is not necessary to have appraisers.

*Digest*362; *Code 424,*§ 2360, refers to a distress and sale without replevin.

This was an action of replevin for a carriage, &c. The pleas were non cepit, and cognizance as bailiff of James Martin, for a half year’s rent in arrear from plaintiff to said Martin. Replication, no rent in arrear; non dimisit; non tenuit.

The plaintiff proved the taking of a carriage; and closed. The defendant proved that the premises were rented as a stable, for the manure' as the rent; and proceeded to prove the value of the manure.

*Platt*and *Gray,*for plaintiff.

*Bayard, jr.,*for defendant.

*Mr. Gray*

objected to any other proof of the value of the manure, than that furnished by the appraisers under section 2 of the act of 1829, *(Digest*361.)

But the court overruled the objection; considering that provision as applicable only to a mode of ascertaining the rent upon a sale of the distress, without replevin.

The jury are to ascertain the amount of the rent, or value, when the rent is in kind.

Verdict for defendant.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

LEVAR LEONARD JONES, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 313 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Unpublished Memorandum and 

Order of the Superior Court at No. 1442 

MDA 2014 exited March 31, 2015, 

affirming the Order of the Lancaster 

County Court of Common Pleas at No. 

CP-36-CR-0003302-1994 exited August 

11, 2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is GRANTED on the issue of whether Petitioner’s sentence violates the prohibition 

against mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders announced by the Supreme 

Court of the United States in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012). 

As a result of the recent holding by that Court that Miller must be applied retroactively 

by the States, see Montgomery v. Louisiana, 2016 WL 280758 (U.S. Jan. 25, 2016), the 

Superior Court’s order is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further 

proceedings consistent with Montgomery. 

To the extent necessary, leave is to be granted to amend the post-conviction 

petition to assert the jurisdictional provision of the Post Conviction Relief Act extending 

to the recognition of constitutional rights by the Supreme Court of the United States 

which it deems to be retroactive. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(1)(iii). 

DECIDED: February 24, 2016
[313 MAL 2015] - 2 

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

matter.
# Official Journal C 354/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.354.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 354 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5517 November 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.354.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 354

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5517 November 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 354/01 | Commission Decision of 15 November 2012 on notifying the third countries that the Commission considers as possible of being identified as non-cooperating third countries pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 354/01

Commission Decision of 15 November 2012 on notifying the third countries that the Commission considers as possible of being identified as non-cooperating third countries pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6465

CHILES P. EVANS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of

Corrections; FRED SCHILLING, Department of

Corrections Medical (Head); L. KELLY, Warden -

SX-1,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (2:06-cv-00404-JBF)

Submitted: July 19, 2007 Decided: July 25, 2007

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chiles P. Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Chiles P. Evans appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Evans v.

Johnson, No. 2:06-cv-00404-JBF (E.D. Va. Mar. 7, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 993

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the period for

the rollover of gain from the sale of a principal residence to a principal

residence located in a disaster area.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 18, 1993

Mrs. MINK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend

the period for the rollover of gain from the sale of

a principal residence to a principal residence located

in a disaster area.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF PERIOD FOR ROLLOVER OF

4 GAIN ON SALE OF PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE TO

5 PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE LOCATED IN DISAS6 TER AREA.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1034 of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 (relating to rollover of gain on sale
2

•HR 993 IH

1 of principal residence) is amended by redesignating sub2 section (l) as subsection (m) and by inserting after sub3 section (k) the following new subsection:

4 ‘‘(l) SPECIAL RULE WHERE NEW RESIDENCE LO5 CATED IN DISASTER AREA.—

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If the taxpayer’s new resi7 dence is located or is to be located in a qualified dis8 aster area designated subsequent to the sale of the

9 taxpayer’s old residence, subsection (a) shall be ap10 plied by substituting ‘ending 4 years, or such longer

11 period as designated by the Secretary’ for ‘ending 2

12 years’.

13 ‘‘(2) QUALIFIED DISASTER AREA.—For pur14 poses of this subsection, the term ‘qualified disaster

15 area’ means an area designated by the President of

16 the United States to warrant assistance by the Fed17 eral Government under the Robert T. Stafford Dis18 aster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act.’’

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

20 subsection (a) shall apply to new residences (within the

21 meaning of section 1034 of the Internal Revenue Code of

22 1986) purchased on or after August 24, 1992, in taxable

23 years ending after such date. For purposes of the preced24 ing sentence, any part of the new residence which is con25 structed or reconstructed by the taxpayer shall be treated
3

•HR 993 IH

1 as purchased by the taxpayer on the date such construc2 tion or reconstruction is completed.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-QSB of General Devices,  Inc. for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.


</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000040528
<NAME>                                         GENERAL DEVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000



<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                  91
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        91
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          91
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    2
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               100
<OTHER-SE>                                             (11)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            91
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        17
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (17)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (17)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (17)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .002
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .002



</TABLE>