alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 905 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 905

    To require the Bureau of Land Statistics to collect and report 
    unemployment and related statistics by congressional districts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 1993

  Mr. Owens introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Bureau of Land Statistics to collect and report 
    unemployment and related statistics by congressional districts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 4 of the 
Act of March 4, 1913 (29 U.S.C. 2), relating to the collection, 
collation, and reports of labor statistics, is amended by striking out 
``by such smaller geographical subdivisions'' and inserting in lieu 
thereof ``by congressional districts and such smaller geographical 
subdivisions''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000040643
<NAME>                         FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
<CURRENCY>                     U.S. DOLLARS
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                          1
<CASH>                                 559
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                       22,818
<ALLOWANCES>                         3,205
<INVENTORY>                         19,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    44,947
<PP&E>                              21,284
<DEPRECIATION>                      11,936
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      84,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               11,544
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                             1,367
<OTHER-SE>                          44,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        84,033
<SALES>                             27,447
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    27,447
<CGS>                               14,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       14,944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     9,574
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        56
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      2,404
<INCOME-TAX>                         1,025
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  1,379
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                         1,379
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.35

</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-904

_____________________________

BELINDA HERSH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Marianne L. Aho, Judge.

September 24, 2020

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Schweikart *v.*American Slicing Machine Company, Appellant.

Argued May 1, 1934.

Before Tbexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baedrige, Stadteeed, Parker and James, JJ.

*Jacob A. Market,*for appellant.

*Frank J. Scott,*and with him *Crawford Scott,*for appellee.

July 13, 1934:

Per Curiam,

This is an action of trespass. The case was tried on September 12, 1933 in the absence of the defendant, and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. On *486September 28, 1933, judgment was entered on the verdict. On October 9, 1933, defendant presented a petition asking the lower court to open the judgment and grant a new trial. This the court refused to do, and this appeal followed. The whole matter resolves itself to the question whether the court abused its discretion in so doing. The petition discloses that the defense to the suit was entrusted to a lawyer “who was neglectful and remiss in his duties as counsel for the defendant, and he did fail to enter his appearance for and on behalf of the defendant, and did fail to take any steps required of him, or necessary to defend the said suit.” The consequences following the unfortunate selection of a careless attorney should not, unless good reasons appear, be shifted to the plaintiff, and he be put to the expense and labor of another trial with the delay necessarily incident to it. If the attorney whose neglect caused this situation now presented, had appeared as a petitioner on behalf of his client and showed some reasonable cause why he had failed to prepare for the trial, and why he was absent when it took place, the court might have granted relief, nor do we say, even as the matter is now presented, the court could not have granted defendant’s petition, but it was a matter within the sound discretion of the lower court, and we see no reason why we should interfere. Good lawyers are not scarce, and where litigants select unreliable counsel, who do not attend to the matters entrusted to them, there is no rigid rule, which requires the court to relieve them from the result of their bad judgment in selecting a poor agent.

The judgment is affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 24, 2013

N o. 04

- 12

- 00744

- CR

James Davis MORRISON

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR7696

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sachiko Nagao, the court reporter responsible for preparing the rep orter’s record, has

filed a notification of late reporter’s record, requesting an extension of time to May 19, 2013. We

GRANT the extension and ORDER Sachiko Nagao to file the reporter’s record on or before May

19, 2013. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANT ED.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24 th day of April, 2013

.

____________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with The Beard Company’s (the “Company”) Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Herb Mee, Jr., President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                     |                                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  November 19, 2007 | By:  /s/ Herb Mee, Jr.               

Herb Mee, Jr.President and Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Certification of
CFO





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Frequency Electronics, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan L.
Miller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Alan Miller
              
              December
      15, 2010Alan
      L. MillerChief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.




This
certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”).  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.
# C_2014261EN.01002202.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 June 2014 — Basic v OHIM — Repsol YPF (basic)

(Case T-372/11) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark basic - Earlier Community figurative mark BASIC - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the services - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2014/C 261/44

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Basic AG Lebensmittelhandel (Munich, Germany) (represented by: D. Altenburg and H. Bickel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Repsol YPF, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.-B. Devaureix, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 March 2011 (Case R 1440/2010-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Repsol YPF SA and Basic AG Lebensmittelhandel.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Basic AG Lebensmittelhandel to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Basic AG Lebensmittelhandel to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,899
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,915
<ALLOWANCES>                                       738
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,076
<PP&E>                                           3,657
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,541
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,499
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,245
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,622
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,598
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,445
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,153
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,153
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**PC MALL, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of PC Mall, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brandon H. LaVerne,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the UnitedStates Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

This Certification has notbeen, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.

 

March 16, 2009

 

 
| /s/ Brandon H. LaVerne  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Brandon H. LaVerne      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 134 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 134

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 28, 1993.
    Resolved, That clause 3 of rule XXVII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by inserting after the fourth sentence the following 
new sentence: ``Once a motion to discharge has been filed, the Clerk shall make 
the signatures a matter of public record.''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                             Verizon California Inc.

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                                        Three Months Ended
(Dollars in Millions)                                     March 31, 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Income before provision for income taxes                          $  271.0
Interest expense                                                      32.8
Portion of rent expense representing interest                          9.0
Amortization of capitalized interest                                    .4
                                                       -------------------

Earnings, as adjusted                                             $  313.2
                                                       ===================

Fixed charges:
Interest expense                                                  $   32.8
Portion of rent expense representing interest                          9.0
Capitalized interest                                                   1.9
                                                       -------------------

Fixed Charges                                                     $   43.7
                                                       ===================

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                    7.17
                                                       ===================
#### Abe GROSSINGER, Appellant, v. NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL BANK OF MIAMI, f/k/a Lincoln National Bank of Miami, a national banking corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-117.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 14, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 20, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Mary Jane Davis, Admitted on March 5, 1984, at a Term of the Appellate Division, First Department.

[739 NYS2d 815]

Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Saxe and Ellerin, JJ. [See 240 AD2d 106.]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 189 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 189

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 14, 1993.
Whereas the Voice of America is the global radio network of the United States 
        Government, seeking to promote understanding abroad for the United 
        States, its people, culture, and policies;
Whereas the Voice of America's charter calls upon it to provide consistently 
        reliable and authoritative news, balanced and comprehensive information 
        about the United States, and official pronouncements of the United 
        States Government;
Whereas the Voice of America broadcasts are not directed to audiences in the 
        United States, so that most Americans have no first-hand knowledge of 
        the professionalism and patriotism that are the hallmark of such 
        broadcasts;
Whereas the Voice of America tells America's story to the world on a daily 
        basis, not only in terms of news and politics and policy, but also by 
        reflecting the complexity, diversity, and excellence of American art and 
        culture;
Whereas chief among our Nation's indigenous art forms is jazz;
Whereas since 1955, Willis Conover of Voice of America has been broadcasting the 
        best of American jazz to millions around the world;
Whereas during that time, the music of Duke Ellington, Charlie Parker, Ella 
        Fitzgerald, Benny Goodman, Dizzy Gillespie, and other great American 
        artists, broadcast by Mr. Conover, have come to symbolize the freedom 
        and creativity of democracy for those denied freedom; and
Whereas Mr. Conover has said ``Jazz is a liberating kind of music . . . every 
        emotion--love, anger, joy, sadness--can be communicated with the 
        vitality and spirit that characterizes our country at its best--which is 
        of course the same freedom that people everywhere should enjoy.'': Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives applauds the Voice of America 
for disseminating the very best of American culture to those in other lands, 
exemplified in the work of Willis Conover who for thirty-eight years has made a 
unique and important contribution to the cause of international understanding 
and good will.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
## Martin, Michael (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: Subject: Michael, Mike Sharkey <msharkey@hamilton.net> Tuesday, January 27, 2015 12:33 PM Martin, Michael (OST) EAS Decision Extension

North Platte AirportAuthoritywould like to request adecision extension regarding our communities' EAS aircarrier recommendation until 28 February 2015. This will give us timeto see howADI's appeal and apparent reapplication process is going. In the meantime please hold Great Lakes in. Your assistance in this matter is very much appreciated. We can onlyguess howstressful this whole process must be for you and Kevin. Best regards, Mike Sharkey Airport Manager

1