# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 0885 V (not to be published)

PATRICIA L. GUZOWSKI

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: December 30, 2019

Special Processing Unit (SPU);
Attorney’s Fees and Costs

Daniel Henry Pfeifer, Pfeifer, Morgan & Stesiak, South Bend, IN , for P etitioner.

Julia Marter Collison , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY ’ S FEES AND COSTS 1

On June 21, 2018

, Patricia L. Guzowski, (“P etitioner ”) filed a petition for
compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C.
§300aa

- 10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder
injury related to vaccine administration as the result of a tetanus/diphtheria/acellular
pertussis vaccine administered on January 25, 2016

. ( Petition at 1)

. On July 3, 2019

, a

decision was issued awarding compensation to P etitioner based on the parties’
stipulation

. (ECF No. 27 )

.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the per tinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2 Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated October 27,

2019 (ECF No. 30 ) requesting a total award of $ 6,826.44 (representing $ 6,205.00 in fees
and $ 621.44 in costs). In accordance with General Order #9 Petitioner filed a signed

statement indicating that she incurred no out

- of

- pocket expenses. (ECF No. 33 )

. Respondent reacted to the motion on October 29, 2019 indicating that he is satisfied that
the statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and cos ts are met in this case

and defers to the Court’s discretion to determine the amount to be awarded. (ECF No.
31). Petitioner did not file a reply thereafter.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with P etitioner’s request. In my experience , the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested

hours or rates.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney ’ s fees and costs

. §
15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney ’ s fees and costs. I

award a total of $ 6,826.44 (representing $ 6,205.00 in attorney’s fees and $ 621.44 in
costs) as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and P etitioner’s

counsel

. In the absence of a timely

- filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules
of the Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.