alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 0638 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2013 - SW - 026 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FORTE COMPUTER EASY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND FROM THE DATE OF INCEPTION (JUNE 19, 1996) TO
DECEMBER 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-19-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         964,062
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,741,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                   439,000
<INVENTORY>                                 10,971,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,366,051
<PP&E>                                      16,460,159
<DEPRECIATION>                                 321,315
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,743,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,190,317
<BONDS>                                     17,532,570
<COMMON>                                       486,058
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,780,504
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,743,891
<SALES>                                     25,248,908
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       19,026,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,059,868
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,546
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             755,758
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,401,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                   640,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            761,089
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   761,089
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 

FIRST HIGH-SCHOOL EDUCATION GROUP CO., LTD. 

第一高中教育集团有限公司 

 

			
	Number	  	Class A Ordinary Shares

 Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands 

Share capital is US$50,000 divided into 5,000,000,000 shares comprising of 

(i) 4,900,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.00001 each and 

(ii) 100,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.00001 each 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT
                    
                                         
                     is the registered holder of                 
                     Class A Ordinary Shares in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association thereof. 

EXECUTED on behalf of the said Company on the
                     day of                     
                     by: 
  

			
	DIRECTOR
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with this Quarterly Report of Western Sierra Mining Corp. (the
"Company")on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Chaffee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 17, 2004


                                                /s/ Michael M. Chaffee
                                                --------------------------------
                                                    Michael Chaffee
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Sierra Mining Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Denis
Atkins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Dated August 17, 2004

                                               /s/  Dennis Atkins
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                    Dennis Atkins
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 204 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 57

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 204

                          [Report No. 103-148]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 2446) making 
appropriations for military construction for the Department of Defense 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 22, 1993

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                  House Calendar No. 57
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 204

                          [Report No. 103-148]

  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 2446) making 
appropriations for military construction for the Department of Defense 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 1993

 Mr. Hall of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Waiving certain points of order against the bill (H.R. 2446) making 
appropriations for military construction for the Department of Defense 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That during consideration of the bill (H.R. 2446) making 
appropriations for military construction for the Department of Defense 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes, 
all points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to 
comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. The amendments en bloc 
specified in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution to be offered by Representative Fawell of Illinois or a 
designee may amend portions of the bill not yet read for amendment, 
shall be considered as read when offered, and shall not be subject to a 
demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of 
the Whole.
```
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Edgar John GARRISON and John Carlton Parsons, Appellees.

No. 73-232.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 1973.

Joseph P. D’Alessandro, State’s Atty., and Louis S. St. Laurent, Chief Asst. State’s Atty., Fort Myers, for appellant.

Douglas M. Midgley, Public Defender, and Steven Wallace, Chief Asst. Public Defender, Fort Myers, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Benefield v. State, Fla.1964, 160 So.2d 706, and State v. Kelly, Fla.App.1972, 260 So.2d 903.

LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99
                                                                      ----------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Western Power & Equipment
Corp. (the "Company") for the period ending July 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, C. Dean
McLain, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, based on my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopteD pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ C. Dean McLain
------------------------
C. Dean McLain
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2002


<PAGE>



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Western Power & Equipment
Corp. (the "Company") for the period ending July 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark J.
Wright, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, based on my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Mark J. Wright
------------------------
Mark J. Wright
Chief Financial Officer
November 15, 2002
----

(2004/C 78 E/0174)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2805/03

by Avril Doyle (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(19 September 2003)

Subject:   Solar energy

Can the Commission advise whether there are any common funds available for the conversion of individual dwelling houses to solar power?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(27 October 2003)

The Commission informs the Honourable Member that, based on the 6th Research and Technological Development Framework Programme 2003-2006, priority thematic area ‘Sustainable development, global change and ecosystems’, the Commission has in place a relevant activity to exploit solar energy for electricity and heat generation.

The short and medium term part of this activity supports projects aiming at the cost reduction of renewable energy technologies and their large scale integration within local communities. Common contributions for the conversion of individual dwelling houses to solar power may be available only if the action is integrated within a large project, that presents appropriate elements of research and technological innovation, and has a clear European dimension.

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6618
MICHAEL ANTHONY DUNCAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus BISHOP ROBINSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-692-JFM) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 25, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Anthony Duncan, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Duncan v. Robinson , No. CA-97-692-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IN RE: MARCUS ESCOBOSA, PATRICK H. HAYES, 

JAMES N. CONWAY, JR.,

Appellants

______________________

2018-2259

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 14/736,761.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

JAMES J. LUKAS, JR., Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Chicago, 

IL, argued for appellants. Also represented by BENJAMIN 

GILFORD, GARY R. JAROSIK. 

 MAUREEN DONOVAN QUELER, Office of the Solicitor, 

United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, 

VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by 

THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, ROBERT J. MCMANUS,

AMY J. NELSON. 

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Case: 18-2259 Document: 56 Page: 1 Filed: 02/06/2020
 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MAYER and 

LOURIE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 February 6, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court 

Case: 18-2259 Document: 56 Page: 2 Filed: 02/06/2020
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eugene Cox, Appellant.

[737 NYS2d 274]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered June 1, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and identification. The credible testimony established that the officers who witnessed the drug transaction had a sufficient opportunity to observe defendant and that they made a reliable identification.

The court appropriately corrected and cautioned the prosecutor in response to defendant’s objection during the People’s summation. We decline to review those portions of the summation the challenges to which are unpreserved. We note, however, that none would warrant reversal. Concur — Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.
i i i i i i



### MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00262-CV MASS MARKETING, LTD. d/b/a Super S Foods, Appellant

v. Stephen FREY , Appellee From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2004-CI-14019 Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice Catherine Stone, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 17, 2008 MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)(1). We order all costs assessed against appellant. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(d) (absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant). PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The financial data schedule contains summary information extracted from Part I
of Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000937136
<NAME>                        HYPERDYNAMICS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JUL-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        4908
<SECURITIES>                  94000
<RECEIVABLES>                 179262
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   65508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              419648
<PP&E>                        83153                 
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                662607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         284090
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      12208
<OTHER-SE>                    366309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  662607
<SALES>                       820535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              820535
<CGS>                         702164
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 702164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              707294
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            3428
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (558324)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (558324)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (558324)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.07)
        



</TABLE>
#### Robert WALDEN, a/k/a Addis, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-303.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 8, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Louis Weissing, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
EX-10.13





 Exhibit 10.13 

 

					
	 




  
	  	 	  	Idan Wallichman <[email address]>
	 Fwd: My terms

2 messages
	  	 	  	 
			
	Idan Wallichman <[email address] >	  		  	Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:32 AM
	To: Idan Wallichman <[email address]>	  		  	

 ———Forwarded message——— 

From: Andrey <[email address]> 
 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 at
12:31 
 Subject: Re: My terms 
 To: Idan Wallichman <[email
address]> 
 Confirm 
 On 4 Oct 2017, at
14:08, Idan Wallichman <[email address]> wrote: 
 Hi Andrey 

Following our conversation, I would like to summarise what we agreed. 

 

	 	1.	 50,000 GBP bonus to be paid by the company on the next payroll. 



 

	 	2.	 Currently, my notice period is 6 Months.In the event of change of control in WVL shares, I would like to amend
it to be 12 months notice period from the company and keep 6 months from my side 


  

	 	3.	 Vesting acceleration of my options in the event of an exit. we agree to amend the option agreement so in an
exit event, my options will be fully vested the earlier between the current agreement and 12 months after the exit date. in the event of an exit and if the company decided to release me before the options are fully vested (12 months after the exit
date) the remainder of the options vesting period will be fully accelerated on my departure. All the additional option vesting acceleration post the exit date will be converted to net cash with the same terms of the options which already vested
prior to the exit date. 


  

	 	4.	 Salary raise- we will Increase my salary once the company recruit an HRD, CMO, and IR officer



 Please confirm so I can instruct HR/Mishcon to amend the above. 

Thank you
H. Res. 233

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

August 4, 1993.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2401) to authorize appropriations for fiscal

year 1994 for military activities of the Department of Defense, to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year

1994, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined

to the bill and the amendment in the nature of a substitute

recommended by the Committee on Armed Services now

printed in the bill and shall not exceed two hours equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Armed Services. After general

debate the Committee shall rise without motion. No further
2

HRES 233 EH

consideration of the bill shall be in order except pursuant to

a subsequent order of the House.

Attest:

Clerk.