alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S10-10031 I-003 

vLLkJ—mX Illinois Manufacturers' Association vvwvv.inia-mi.org 

i.M i Wosl 22\ui Sli.r! • Siiili- (i20 • ( Kik Hrook. Illinois 605:! i • 6.^0- if.K-5;{()0 • htx: 6;50-218-~-t67 

.?J() lo-l Adams Slrwl • hpringlickl, lllinuis 62701 • 2 I 7-"ij:M2-fl) • Fnx: 2 17-522-2 !f.7 

tni.iil: im.iiiiimj-tv'i.orj:; 

March 4, 2010 

Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C, 20590 

Docket DOT-OST2010 0034 lo/c - cc^ l 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalf of the Illinois Manufacturers' Association and our thousands of member companies located 

across the state, I would like to express our strong support of the application for antitrust immunity 

and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan Airlines. The proposed 

alliance between these two airlines is vital for the oneworld Alliance to compete effectively with the Star 

and Sky Team Alliances. Increasing competition will enhance the benefits of the Department of 

Transportation's Open Skies policy - first by solidifying U.S.-Japan Open Skies and then by serving as a 

foundation for further liberalization across Asia. 

Illinois is home to a number of global companies like Caterpillar, Deere & Company, and Archer Daniels 

Midland that rely on an open and competitive marketplace. The oneworld Alliance will have a positive 

impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and pricing options, and other 

benefits created by strong competition among three competitive air alliances. 

After a thorough review, we encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this AA/JAL 

application as it would enable these oneworld Alliance airlines to work closely together to deliver highly 

competitive air transportation services. The U.S. DOT can help ensure that airlines have every 

opportunity to stay competitive in both a challenging economy and increasingly global market by 

approving this application. 

Thank you for your hard work in achieving the U.S.-Japan Open Skies agreement and I look forward to 

your quick approval of this pending application. 

Sincerely, 

Gregory VV. Bais? 

President & CEO 

5('(V';>i£,' Illinois nuiniUiclurors sincx' III9J
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William L. Haight, Appellant.

[720 NYS2d 857]

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tioga County (Squeglia, J.), rendered May 21, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the first degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of rape in the first degree with the understanding that County Court would sentence him to 12 V2 years in prison. Defendant failed to appear for sentencing and, after being apprehended and returned to this State, was sentenced to a prison term of 15 years. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that no nonfrivolous issues exist. Based upon our review of the record, defense counsel’s brief and defendant’s *pro se*submissions, we cannot agree. Where, as here, defendant did not waive his right to appeal as part of the plea agreement and an enhanced sentence was imposed, we cannot conclude that an appeal would be “wholly frivolous,” regardless of whether any issues are ultimately determined to be without merit *(see, People v Espino,*279 AD2d 798). Inasmuch as a review of the record and defendant’s *pro se*submissions raise arguably meritorious issues, we grant defense counsel’s application to be relieved of her assignment and new counsel will be assigned to address any issues that the record may disclose *(see, People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d 979, *lv denied*67 NY2d 650).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Peters, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.
Union Calendar No. 17

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 720

[Report No. 103–40, Part I]

A BILL

To authorize the adjustment of the boundaries of

purposes.District of Custer National Forest, and for otherthe South Dakota portion of the Sioux Ranger

MARCH 24, 1993

Committee on Agriculture discharged; committed to the

Union, and ordered to be printedCommittee of the Whole House on the State of the
IB

Union Calendar No. 17

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 720

[Report No. 103–40, Part I]

To authorize the adjustment of the boundaries of the South Dakota portion

of the Sioux Ranger District of Custer National Forest, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1993

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

MARCH 23, 1993

Reported and referred to the Committee on Agriculture for a period ending

not later than March 24, 1992, for consideration of such provisions of

the bill as fall within the jurisdiction of that committee pursuant to

clause 1(a), rule X.

MARCH 24, 1993

Committee on Agriculture discharged; committed to the Committee of the

Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To authorize the adjustment of the boundaries of the South

Dakota portion of the Sioux Ranger District of Custer

National Forest, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 720 RH

1 SECTION 1. SIOUX RANGER DISTRICT BOUNDARY ADJUST2 MENT.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the Act enti4 tled ‘‘An Act to consolidate national forest lands’’, ap5 proved March 20, 1922 (16 U.S.C. 485 et seq.), and in

6 exchange for national forest lands in Custer National For7 est, the Secretary of Agriculture may accept title to any

8 lands located within five miles of the exterior boundaries

9 of the South Dakota portion of the Sioux Ranger District

10 of Custer National Forest that are not owned by the

11 United States and that are found by the Secretary of Agri12 culture to be chiefly valuable for national forest purposes.

13 (b) INCORPORATION INTO CUSTER NATIONAL FOR14 EST.—Upon acceptance of title by the Secretary of Agri15 culture, lands conveyed to the United States in accordance

16 with subsection (a) shall become part of the Custer

17 National Forest.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

G&K Services, Inc.Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of G&K Services, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended December 28, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Thomas R.
Moberly, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jeffrey L. Wright, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, that, to the
best of his knowledge:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                        
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 28, 2002
and the results of its operations for such period.

|                        |  |     |  |                                                                                                           
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 11, 2003 |  |     |  |                                                                                                           
|                       
|                        |  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas R. MoberlyThomas R. Moberly
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)              
|                       
|                        |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey L. WrightJeffrey L. Wright
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer)

23
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Western Sierra Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Chaffee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 20, 2005

/s/ Michael M. ChaffeeMichael ChaffeeChief Executive Officer

1

---
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 12

GTE Florida Incorporated and Subsidiary
STATEMENT OF THE CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Nine Months Ended         Nine Months Ended
                                                              September 30, 1997(a)      September 30, 1997
                                                             -----------------------   -----------------------
<S>                                                         <C>                       <C>
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income from continuing operations                          $               146,902   $               146,902
  Add - Income taxes                                                          96,004                    96,004
        - Fixed charges                                                       47,806                    97,594
                                                             -----------------------   -----------------------
Adjusted earnings                                            $               290,712   $               340,500
                                                             =======================   =======================

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                           $                40,254   $                90,042
  Portion of rent expense
      representing interest                                                    7,552                     7,552
                                                             -----------------------   -----------------------
Adjusted fixed charges                                       $                47,806   $                97,594
                                                             =======================   =======================

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                              6.08                      3.49

</TABLE>




(a)   Excludes $49.8 million of interest expense associated with commercial
      paper issued by the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, GTE Funding
      Incorporated (GTE Funding), on behalf of GTE's other domestic telephone
      operating subsidiaries. This interest is refunded to the Company through
      interest income on affiliate notes between GTE Funding and the domestic
      telephone operating subsidiaries. GTE Funding provides short-term
      financing and investment vehicles and cash management services for the
      Company and six other of GTE's domestic telephone operating subsidiaries.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 25

Congratulating the people of India on the occasion of the 46th anniversary

of their nation’s independence.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. STEARNS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Affairs

RESOLUTION

Congratulating the people of India on the occasion of the

46th anniversary of their nation’s independence.

Whereas, on August 15, 1947, the people of India were

granted their independence from the British Empire;

Whereas the people of India have maintained a free and

democratic nation for 46 years;

Whereas the Republic of India is the largest democracy in the

world;

Whereas the people of the United States seek to maintain

friendly ties with the democratic nations of the world;

and

Whereas the recent decline in world tensions offers new opportunities for international cooperation at every level:

Now, therefore, be it
2

•HRES 25 IH

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) congratulates the people of India on the oc3 casion of the 45th anniversary of India’s independ4 ence from the British Empire, which will be cele5 brated on August 14, 1993; and

6 (2) looks forward to the continuance of friendly

7 relations between the people of the United States

8 and the people of India.

Æ
Union Calendar No. 40

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 843

[Report No. 103–85]

A BILL

To withdraw certain lands located in the Coronado

purposes.leasing laws of the United States, and for otherNational Forest from the mining and mineral

MAY 11, 1993

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Commitordered to be printed tee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and
IB

Union Calendar No. 40

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 843

[Report No. 103–85]

To withdraw certain lands located in the Coronado National Forest from

the mining and mineral leasing laws of the United States, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. KOLBE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Natural Resources

MAY 11, 1993

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To withdraw certain lands located in the Coronado National

Forest from the mining and mineral leasing laws of

the United States, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 843 RH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cave Creek Canyon

3 Protection Act of 1993’’.

4 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF LANDS WITHIN CAVE CREEK CAN5 YON DRAINAGE.

6 (a) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights,

7 after the date of enactment of this Act lands within the

8 Cave Creek Canyon Drainage are withdrawn from location

9 entry, location, or patent under the general mining laws,

10 the operation of the mineral and geothermal leasing laws

11 and the mineral material disposal laws.

12 (b) DEFINITION.—For the purposes of this Act, the

13 term ‘‘Cave Creek Canyon Drainage’’ means lands and in14 terest in lands owned by the United States within the area

15 depicted on the map of record entitled ‘‘Cave Creek Min16 eral Withdrawal’’, dated November 1, 1991. The map

17 shall be on file and available for public inspection in the

18 offices of the Forest Service, Department of Agriculture.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 297 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 297

  Providing for greater disclosure of information relating to franked 
      mass mailing and voting records of Members of the House of 
                            Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 4, 1993

  Mr. Santorum submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
   jointly to the Committees on Post Office and Civil Service, House 
                       Administration, and Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for greater disclosure of information relating to franked 
      mass mailing and voting records of Members of the House of 
                            Representatives.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``Franking Fairness and Voting 
Disclosure Resolution''.

SEC. 2. MATTER APPROVED FOR FRANKED MASS MAILING TO BE AVAILABLE TO THE 
              PUBLIC.

    The House Commission on Congressional Mailing Standards and each 
Member of the House of Representatives shall make available to the 
public for review and copying all matter approved by the Commission for 
franked mass mailing by the Member. Any copying under the preceding 
sentence shall be at the expense of the person who requests the 
copying.

SEC. 3. DISCLOSURE OF VOTING RECORDS OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF 
              REPRESENTATIVES.

    The Doorkeeper of the House of Representatives shall, upon request, 
disclose to the public the voting record of any Member of the House of 
Representatives. The disclosure shall be in a standard format approved 
by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. DEFINITION.

    As used in this resolution, the term ``Member of the House of 
Representatives'' means a Representative in, or a Delegate or Resident 
Commissioner, to the Congress.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  329,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,100
<INVENTORY>                                     24,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               338,200
<PP&E>                                       4,633,700
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,901,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,299,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          452,500
<BONDS>                                        796,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        400
<COMMON>                                       525,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     183,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,299,200
<SALES>                                      1,227,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,227,300
<CGS>                                          374,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  773,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                401,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                   157,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            244,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   244,600
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Billy Wayne SINCLAIR v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 54110.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 4, 1974.

In re: Billy Wayne Sinclair applying for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of this Court’s jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J., recused.

TATE and DIXON, JJ., are of the opinion that the writ should be granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERISTEEL CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,848
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    106,830
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               192,693
<PP&E>                                         317,496
<DEPRECIATION>                                  67,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 543,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,841
<BONDS>                                        216,835
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                     169,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   543,400
<SALES>                                        343,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               343,805
<CGS>                                          277,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  277,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,542
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,468
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,544
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,108
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,436
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,436
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.83
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE use of JOHN M. ROBINSON, minor *vs.*ROGER ADAMS et al.

Postponements will not be allowed for the absence of one of several counsel, without consent.

The appointment of a guardian by the Orphans’ Court in Maryland, certified under the seal of the register of wills, is not admissible in evidence.

Wednesday, October 4, 1848. Debt on an administration bond, c. t. a.

*Mr. Salisbury*asked a postponement until his colleague, *Mr. Bayard,*should arrive. Not being consented to by counsel, the motion was refused. He then asked to strike his name from the record, which was also refused.

The case went on, and the plaintiff was nonsuited, the certificate of the appointment of plaintiff’s guardian being rejected.

The certificate was in form pursuant to the act of 1839, [9 vol., 269,] but it was under the hand and seal of the register of wills of Caroline county, Maryland, certifying that the Orphans’ Court had appointed plaintiff’s guardian; instead of being under the seal of the Orphans’ Court, and hand of the clerk of that court.

*Mr. Houston*suggested that the register of wills might be ex officio clerk of the Orphans’ Court; but—

*The Court*said that it ought to appear by the certificate if it was so; and that nothing could supply the want of the court’s seal.

Judgment of nonsuit.