alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 217

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

July 21, 1993.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 2010) to amend the National and

Community Service Act of 1990 to establish a Corporation

for National Service, enhance opportunities for national service, and provide national service educational awards to persons participating in such service, and for other purposes. No

further general debate shall be in order. The bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be

in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on

Education and Labor now printed in the bill. The committee

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered

as read. Points of order against the committee amendment in

the nature of a substitute for failure to comply with section
2

HRES 217 EH

302(f) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 or clause

5(a) of rule XXI are waived. Other than pro forma amendments for the purpose of debate, no amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in

order unless printed in the portion of the Congressional

Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII

prior to Tuesday, July 20, 1993. The amendments en bloc

caused to be printed by Representative Ford of Michigan

shall be considered as read and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the

Committee of the Whole. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the

nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. Samuel H. BARLOW, Appellee.

No. N—113.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 6, 1971.

John F. Cuddy, of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto, Dean & Hallowes, Jacksonville, for appellant.

S. Perry Penland, Jacksonville, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the final judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
I N THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

A PPOINTMENT TO CONTINUING

JUDICIAL EDUCATION BOARD OF

JUDGES :

:

:

:

:

: NO. 923

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIA M

AND NOW, this 21 st day of November , 2022 , the Honorable Charles A. Ehrlich,

Philadelphia, is hereby appointed to the Continuing Judicial Education Board of Judges

for a term of three years, commencing December 31, 2022

.
### MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 10 / 26 /2014 **FROM:** Laura Farris /EPA Region 8 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR – 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Xcel Energy Meeting on 11 / 2 5 /2014 **SUMMARY :**  Shaun McGrath participated in a one - on - one meeting with Xcel Energy to discuss their comments on the Clean Power Plan , as well as the NODA and the rate
- to - mass TSD, on Novem ber 2 5 , 2014 , in Denver, Colorado . The Clean Power Plan was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES: EPA**  **Region 8** Shaun McGrath, EPA Region 8 Regional Administrator **E xternal Stakeholders**  Jack Ihle, Director, Environmental Policy, Xcel Energy **From :**  "Ihle, Jack" < Jack.Ihle@xcelenergy.com> **Date:** November 26, 2014 at 3:21:57 PM MST **To:** "McGrath, Shaun" < McGrath.Shaun@epa.gov> **Cc:** "Prager, Frank P" < Frank.Prager@XCELENERGY.COM >, "Palmer, Roy" < roy.palmer@xcelenergy.com> **Subject: Thank you**  Ad ministrator McGrath, Thanks for your time yesterday. We’ve just finished our comments and submitted them. Over the last day, we took a good hard look at our responses to the NODA and the rate
- to - ma ss TSD, and have incorporated our best current thinking there. While it is difficult to judge some of the proposed concepts in those documents without more specifics, such as the impacts of the suggested alternatives on our st ates, w e have attempted to provide our feedback in a way that is useful to EPA. One theme that emerged more strongly in the last stages of our w riting, and that I mentioned to you yesterday, is that we think it is important for EPA to consider and not incr ease the disparity of state targets in any new target
- setting methods (e.g. “holistic” gas, regional renewable potential approaches) it chooses. I look forward to talking more as the process to develop greenhouse regulations continues. Best, **Jack Ihle**  **Xcel Energy | Responsible By Nature Director, Environmental Policy**  1800 Larimer Street, 13 th Floor Denver, CO 80202 **P:** 303.294.2262 **C: 720 -**  **939 -**  **1272 F:**  303.308.7691 **E:** jack.ihle@xcelenergy.com

________________________________________________ **XCELENERGY.COM**
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 10.7


                               AAP HOLDINGS, INC.
                              Caxton Building #880
                                 812 Huron Road
                           Cleveland, Ohio 44115-1126


December 18, 1996

Mr. Frank Amedia, President
Forte Computer Easy, Inc.
1350 Albert Street
Youngstown, OH 44505

Re:  Forte/AAP: Acquisition Services Agreement

Dear Frank:

The purpose of this letter is to set forth our understanding and agreement 
relating to the fees to be paid by Forte Computer Easy, Inc. ("Forte") to AAP 
Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings") for the services which Holdings will provide in 
1997 to Forte for negotiating and structuring acquisitions and the financing 
need for such acquisitions on behalf of Forte (the "Acquisition Fees"). The 
amount of each Acquisition Fee to be paid to Holdings by Forte is one percent 
(1%) of the "Transaction Price" of each acquisition, and the Acquisition Fee 
will be paid at the closing of the respective transaction. The "Transaction 
Price" shall mean the aggregate amount paid by Forte (or its affiliate) for the 
acquisition in the form of cash, stock, stock options, and/or warrants, debt 
instruments, and other liabilities assumed by the acquiring entity including, 
but not limited to, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, bank financing, and 
other forms of indebtedness.

The obligation of Forte to use the acquisition services offered by Holdings 
will expire on December 31, 1997 unless Forte and Holdings agree in writing to 
extend this Agreement beyond that date. All Acquisition Fees which have not 
been paid by that time will be due and payable on December 31, 1997, except for 
Acquisition Fees relating to transactions in progress at the end of 1997 which 
close after December 31, 1997. With respect to those transactions, the 
Acquisition Fee will be paid in 1998 when those acquisitions are completed.

After you have had the opportunity to review the contents of this letter, 
please contact me if you have any questions or comments. If not, please 
acknowledge your acceptance of this understanding and agreement by signing both 
copies of this letter where indicated below. One copy is to be retained by you 
for your files and the other copy returned to me for our files.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             AAP HOLDINGS, INC.

                                             /s/ GEORGE S. HOFMEISTER
                                             ------------------------------ 
                                             George S. Hofmeister, Chairman

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY
FORTE EASY COMPUTER, INC.

By: /s/ FRANK AMEDIA
   ----------------------------
        Frank Amedia, President


Date: December 18, 1996
# Official Journal C 21A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.021.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 21A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5624 January 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.021.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 21A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5624 January 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 021A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — first supplement to the 31st complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 021A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — first supplement to the 31st complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>

                                                                EX-23.1 OTHERDOC


Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-495549, No. 333-30473, No. 333-89908,
No. 333-45463, No. 333-55604, No. 333-63762 and No. 333-49186) and Form S-3 (No.
333-47034, No. 333-47184, No. 333-47190, No. 333-70937, No. 333-102847, No.
333-102391, No. 333-101303, No. 333-100080, No. 333-92408, No. 333-89974, and
No. 333-86438) of P-Com, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2003, relating to
the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this
Form 10-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
March 31, 2003

                                       99
<PAGE>
#### Henry DUBBIN et al., Petitioners, v. CAPITAL NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, a national banking corporation, Respondent.

No. 41434.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 3, 1971.

Mallory H. Horton, of Horton & Schwartz, and Dubbin, Schiff, Berkman *&*Dubbin, Miami, for petitioners.

Eugene Tannenbaum, Miami, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari, we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, reported at 250 So.2d 663, reading as follows:

“PER CURIAM.

“Affirmed.”

This decision upheld the trial judges finding in favor of the respondent-plaintiff in a foreclosure action.

We are unable to ascertain from the case records before us whether or not we have jurisdiction under Article V, Section 4(2), Florida Constitution, F.S.A., when viewed in relation to the allegations of the petition for writ of certiorari that the doctrine of legal estoppel by warranty deed, as enunciated by this Court in Trustees of Internal Improvement Fund v. Lobean, Fla.1961, 127 So.2d 98, should have been applied in the foreclosure action.

Our final decision in this cause would be greatly facilitated by an expression of the District Court of Appeal setting forth the theory and reasoning behind its affirmation of the trial court. Such a request by this Court is not improper. See Home Development Company of St. Petersburg, Inc. v. Bursani, Fla.1964, 168 So.2d 131; State v. Bruno, Fla.1958, 104 So.2d 588, and Rosenthal v. Scott, Fla.1961, 131 So.2d 480.

Accordingly, request is respectfully made to the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, that it reconsider the cause, particularly the question of legal estoppel, and render an opinion setting forth the basis and reasoning upon which its decision is reached. Jurisdiction is relinquished to that court, temporarily, for that purpose, upon completion of which this Court will proceed to determine whether or not the cause should be reviewed here under Article V, Constitution of Florida.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ„ concur.
263 La. 996

#### Elsie Cecile DOBARD, wife of Anthony L. PALAMA v. Anthony L. PALAMA.

No. 53061.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 21, 1972.

In re: Elsie Cecile Dobard applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. Bernard. 268 So.2d 318.

Application denied; the judgment is correct.
[No. 1196-1.

Division One—Panel 2.

May 15, 1972.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael Louis Born, *Appellant.*
#### BOWIE *v.*WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. *9,*

September Term, 1962.]

*Decided October 31, 1962.*

Before the full Court.

Per Curiam.

In this application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief, the only point raised by the petitioner that is worthy of discussion is his claim that the second count of the indictment, upon which he was convicted, charged rape rather than assault with intent to rape. Since he was acquitted *608on the first count charging rape, he invokes the rule against double jeopardy, as well as contending that the conviction on the second count was illegal and unconstitutional, being for an offense not charged therein. The point as to double jeopardy was finally litigated in *Bowie v. Warden,*201 Md. 648, although Chief Judge Markell, for this Court, remarked that the indictment was not in the record. Cf. *Plater v. Warden,*220 Md. 673.

On the point of illegal sentence Judge Manley, in the court below, stated that “the statement by the petitioner that he was found guilty of assault with intent to rape is contrary to the record.” Yet the docket entries show that he was convicted of assault with intent to rape, and the second count was at least ambiguous in form. Under the circumstances we are constrained to remand the case for further consideration of that point by Judge Manley, without affirmance or reversal. We intimate no opinion as to whether the point was finally litigated in *Bowie v. Warden, supra,*or whether a defect in the indictment could be reviewed in this proceeding.

*Leave to appeal granted and case remanded without affirmance or reversal for further proceedings.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                   12,877
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              0
<PP&E>                                3,446,608
<DEPRECIATION>                        1,568,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        1,890,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         0
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                163,593
<OTHER-SE>                            1,071,452
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          1,890,785
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         90,723
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            78,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        4,258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           7,587
<INCOME-TAX>                              2,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       4,887
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              4,887
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 3.3(c)





                 AMENDMENT TO FREMONT GENERAL CORPORATION BYLAWS




     "ARTICLE III - SECTION 2. NUMBER AND QUALIFICATION OF DIRECTORS. The number
of directors of the corporation shall be not less than five nor more than seven
until changed by amendment of the Articles of Incorporation or by a Bylaw duly
adopted by the stockholders amending this Section 2. The exact number of
directors shall be fixed from time to time, within the limits specified in the
Articles of Incorporation or in this Section 2, by a Bylaw or amendment thereof
duly adopted by the stockholders or by the Board of Directors. Pursuant thereto,
it is hereby specified that the corporation shall have seven (7) Directors."



               Adopted by the Board of Directors on March 16, 2004
#### George P. DONALDSON, Jr., Certificate of Competency No. 68-873, Petitioner, v. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF PLANTATION, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-931.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 16, 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
# L_2004354EN.01S00301.xml

| 30.11.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 354/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 354/s3

---

1 November 2004 — New version of EUR-Lex!

europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

The new site incorporates the Celex service and provides free and easy access in 20 languages to the largest documentary database on EU law.

---
Exhibit 15—Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Goodrich Corporation
We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements and intheir related Prospectuses, of our report dated May 2, 2005 relating to the unaudited condensedconsolidated interim financial statements of Goodrich Corporation which are included in its Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005:     Registration    Number Description of Registration Statement Filing Date33-49052 The B.F.Goodrich Company KeyEmployees’ Stock Option Plan – Form S-8 June 26, 1992     333-03293 The B.F.Goodrich Company Stock Option Plan – Form S-8 May 8, 1996     333-19697 The B.F.Goodrich Company Savings Benefit Restoration Plan –Form S-8 January 13, 1997     333-53879 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan – Form S-8 May 29, 1998     333-53881 Rohr, Inc. 1982 Stock Option Plan, Rohr, Inc. 1989 StockIncentive Plan and Rohr, Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive Plan – FormS-8 May 29, 1998     333-76297 Coltec Industries Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan and ColtecIndustries Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors –Form S-8 April 14, 1999     333-77023 The B.F.Goodrich Company StockOption Plan and Goodrich Corporation 2001 Equity Compensation Plan – Form S-8 April 26, 1999     333-60210 Goodrich Corporation Stock Option Plan – Form S-8 May 4, 2001     333-60208 Goodrich Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan – Form S-8 May 4, 2001     333-98165 Shelf Registration for Debt Securities, Series PreferredStock, Common Stock, Stock Purchase Contracts and StockPurchase Units – Form S-3 August 15, 2002     333-107866 Goodrich Corporation Employees’ Savings Plan – Form S-8 August 12, 2003     333-107867 Goodrich Corporation Wage Employees’ Savings Plan – Form S-8 August 12, 2003     333-107868 Goodrich Corporation Savings Plan for Rohr Employees – Form S-8 August 12, 2003     333-109247 Goodrich Corporation Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan –Form S-8 September 29, 2003     333-123721 Goodrich Corporation Outside Director Deferral Plan – Form S-8 March 31, 2005     333-124244 Goodrich Corporation 2001 Equity Compensation Plan – Form S-8 April 22, 2005
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
May 2, 2005
# Official Journal C 47/8 Fe

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 47 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 618 February 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 47

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 618 February 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Euronest Parliamentary Assembly |
| 2018/C 47/01 | Rules of Procedure of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly adopted on 3 May 2011 in Brussels, amended on 3 April 2012 in Baku, on 29 May 2013 in Brussels, on 18 March 2015 in Yerevan and on 1 November 2017 in Kiev | 1 |
| 2018/C 47/02 | Rules of Procedure of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly standing committees adopted by the Euronest PA on 3 May 2011 and amended on 29 May 2013 in Brussels, on 18 March 2015 in Yerevan, and on 1 November 2017 in Kiev | 15 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Euronest Parliamentary Assembly

2018/C 47/01

Rules of Procedure of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly adopted on 3 May 2011 in Brussels, amended on 3 April 2012 in Baku, on 29 May 2013 in Brussels, on 18 March 2015 in Yerevan and on 1 November 2017 in Kiev

1

2018/C 47/02

Rules of Procedure of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly standing committees adopted by the Euronest PA on 3 May 2011 and amended on 29 May 2013 in Brussels, on 18 March 2015 in Yerevan, and on 1 November 2017 in Kiev

15

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2016248EN.01000301.xml

| 8.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 July 2016

(2016/C 248/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1080 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 111,90 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4411 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85085 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4792 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0820 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3782 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,049 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 315,52 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4275 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5144 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2468 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4737 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4328 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5966 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5338 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4934 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 280,63 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,2433 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4044 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4856 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 603,44 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4636 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,157 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,9286 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,979 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6894 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7274 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,7044 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1080

JPY

Japanese yen

111,90

DKK

Danish krone

7,4411

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85085

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4792

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0820

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3782

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,049

HUF

Hungarian forint

315,52

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4275

RON

Romanian leu

4,5144

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2468

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4737

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4328

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5966

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5338

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4934

KRW

South Korean won

1 280,63

ZAR

South African rand

16,2433

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4044

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4856

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 603,44

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4636

PHP

Philippine peso

52,157

RUB

Russian rouble

70,9286

THB

Thai baht

38,979

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6894

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7274

INR

Indian rupee

74,7044

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---