alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brunce Smith, Appellant.

[737 NYS2d 591]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J.), rendered April 5, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 32 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s mistrial motion made after two jurors reported that a spectator had accosted them and unsuccessfully sought their opinion of the case, and that this communication had caused them some discomfort. After a thorough inquiry of these two jurors as well as of the remaining jurors, who had learned of this incident, the court properly determined that no significant communication had taken place and that the incident would not affect the ability of any jurors to reach an impartial verdict *(see, People v Lopez,*222 AD2d 610, *lv denied*88 NY2d 988; *People v Espinal,*183 AD2d 407, 408, *lv denied*80 NY2d 830).

The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting evidence suggesting a drug-related motive for the shooting, since its probative value outweighed its prejudicial effect *(see, People v Mena,*269 AD2d 147, *lv denied*95 NY2d 800). The alleged remoteness of the motive and the witness’s contradictory testimony as to whether or not she was testifying on the basis of her personal observation were factors affecting the weight, rather than the admissibility, of this evidence. *(See, People v Lovacco,*234 AD2d 55, *lv denied*89 NY2d 1096.)

Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Concur — Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.
----

(2004/C 78 E/0872)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3488/03

by Albert Maat (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(24 November 2003)

Subject:   Statements by individual Commissioners against Commission policy

The Netherlands' Commissioner recently spoke out in the Dutch press against European agriculture policy, recently reformed on the basis of a Commission proposal.

Is it possible for serving Commissioners to oppose Commission policy in public?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(19 February 2004)

As the Commission has frequently recalled in replies to written and oral questions by Members of Parliament (1), the Members of the Commission are politicians carrying out a political function who, while honouring the obligations imposed by this function, remain free to express their personal opinions quite independently and on their own responsibility.

As regards outside activities, the Code of Conduct for Commissioners states that ‘Commissioners may be active members of political parties or trade unions, provided that this does not compromise their availability for service in the Commission.’

In the case referred to by the Honourable Member, the comments of the Commissioner responsible for the internal market should be regarded as falling within the above definition and should not therefore be interpreted as impairing the principle of collegiate responsibility.

----

(1)  See for example, the answers given by the Commission to Questions 2459/99, 2600/99 and 2628/99, OJ C 225 E, 8.8.2000 and the answer to Question 2629/99, OJ C 46 E, 13.2.2001.

----
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-00848, No. 333-76851, No. 333-79337, No. 333-82257, No. 333-38860, No. 333-66068, No. 333-105620, No. 333-120708, No. 333-133003, No. 333-141237, No. 333-149763, No. 333-158002 and No. 333-165512) of PC Mall, Inc. (formerly IdeaMall, Inc. and Creative Computers, Inc.) of our report dated March 25, 2011 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Los Angeles, California        |   |
| March 25, 2011            |   |

 

----
Filed 6/13/01 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2001 ND 115

Mark Demarce, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20000303

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Mark Demarce, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20000304

Appeal from the District Court of Ramsey County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Lee A. Christofferson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Michael N. Steffan, Frith & Steffan, 609 Fourth Avenue, P.O. Box 1045, Devils Lake, N.D. 58301-1045, for petitioner, defendant, and appellant.

Lonnie Olson, State’s Attorney, 524 Fourth Avenue, #16, Devils Lake, N.D. 58301, for respondent, plaintiff, and appellee.

Demarce v. State and State v. Demarce

Nos. 20000303 and 20000304

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Mark Demarce appeals from a Northeast Judicial District Court order denying his application for post-conviction relief and his N.D.R.Crim.P. 35 motion for reduction of sentence.  Concluding the judgment of the district court is supported by findings that are not clearly erroneous, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Demarce’s motion for default judgment, and the district court’s disposition is supported by the record, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (6).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Michael O. McGuire, D.J.

[¶3]Michael O. McGuire, D.J., sitting in place of Maring, J., disqualified.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 909 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 909

   To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require that the 
Congressional Budget Office prepare an analysis of the job loss or gain 
               that would result from each reported bill.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 1993

  Mr. Paxon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require that the 
Congressional Budget Office prepare an analysis of the job loss or gain 
               that would result from each reported bill.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Job Impact Accountability Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. CBO JOB ANALYSES.

    Section 403(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 
653(a)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs 
        (4) and (5), respectively, and in paragraph (4) (as 
        redesignated) by striking ``paragraph (1) and (2)'' and 
        inserting ``paragraphs (1), (2), and (3)''; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(3) an estimate of the job creation or loss which would 
        be incurred in carrying out such bill or resolution in the 
        fiscal year in which it is to become effective and in each of 
        the 4 fiscal years following such fiscal year, together with 
        the basis for each such estimate;''.

                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal L 18/22 J

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 18 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5222 January 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 18

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5222 January 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 36/2009 of 11 July 2008 establishing for 2008 the ‘Prodcom list’ of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91
   (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 36/2009 of 11 July 2008 establishing for 2008 the ‘Prodcom list’ of industrial products provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3924/91
   (1)

1

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

*

Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover)

s3

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# February 2019

# image1.png
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                      Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc.
                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                                   Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Stoney M. Stubbs, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (a) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



August 13, 2004                                /s/ Stoney M. Stubbs, Jr.
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Stoney M. Stubbs, Jr.
                                               Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)January 13, 2015(Date of earliest event reported)January 12, 2015





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---




Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn January 12, 2015, we announced we will participate in the UBS MLP One-on-One Conference on Tuesday, January 13, 2015, in Park City, Utah.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The materials used at the conference were made available on ONEOK Partners’ website,www.oneokpartners.com, that morning, beginning at 8 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (7 a.m. Central Standard Time).The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)ExhibitsExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated January 12, 2015.





2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:January 13, 2015By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer





3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated January 12, 2015.








4
<PAGE> 1

EX-19.3
Annual Statement



                   Mercantile Bank National Association
                   ------------------------------------
                    Mercantile Credit Card Master Trust
                    -----------------------------------


      The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Mercantile Bank
National Association, as servicer ("Mercantile"), pursuant to the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement, date May 17, 1995 (the "Agreement") among Mercantile, as
Seller and Servicer, and Chase Manhattan Bank (formerly Chemical Bank), as
Trustee, does hereby certify that:

      1.     Mercantile is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the
             Agreement.  Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have
             their respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

      2.     The undersigned is a Servicing Officer who is duly authorized
             pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this
             Certificate to the Trustee.

      3.     A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period
             ended August 30, 1997, and of its performance under the
             Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

      4.     Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my
             knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations
             under the Agreement throughout such year and no default in the
             performance of such obligations has occurred.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate
this 19th day of September, 1997.


                                    MERCANTILE BANK NATIONAL
                                    ASSOCIATION, Servicer
                                    By:


                                    /s/ Jeffrey D. Cary
                                    ----------------------
                                    Jeffrey D. Cary
                                    Vice President


                                    12
EXHIBIT 99.19




CONSENT OF CHARLES TKACZUK




March 31, 2011





Brigus Gold Corp.


United States Securities and Exchange Commission





Re: Brigus Gold Corp.





Ladies and Gentlemen:





I hereby consent to (i) the use of my name in connection with the following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 40-F”) of Brigus Gold Corp. (the “Company”) to which this consent relates: (A) the technical report entitled “Black Fox Project National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report” dated January 6, 2011 (the “Report”), (B) the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2010 and (C) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2010, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-113889 and 333-162558), as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.





Sincerely,




/s/ Charles TkaczukName: Charles Tkaczuk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 19, 2018

t1212

Order 

Clerk

December 19, 2018

158177

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 158177

COA: 338629 

Ingham CC: 16-000519-FH

DAKOTA LEE SHORTER,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 7, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
261 La. 1065

#### NU-IDEA FURNITURE COMPANY v. Mona Thomas RUIZ, wife of/and Donald Ruiz.

No. 52482.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 1972.

In re: Mona Thomas Ruiz, wife of/and Donald Ruiz applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 260 So.2d 87.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
Exhibit
23.3











CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT
COMPANY, L.P.











We hereby
consent to: (i) the use in the Form 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 of Hyperdynamics Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company") under,
of information contained in our reserve report letter relating to the reserves
and revenue, as of June 30, 2007, of certain interests held by HYD Resources
Corporation, a subsidiary of the Company; (ii) all references to such reserve
report letter and/or to this firm in the Form 10-K; (iii) our being named as an
expert in the Form 10-K; and (iv) the incorporation of this consent into the
Form 10-K.










RYDER
      SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.









Houston,
Texas


April 17,
2008
LINDA DENISE WILLIAMS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2596

__ ___________________________/

Opinion filed October 5, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Edward P. Nickinson, III , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahass ee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., MARSTILLER and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, 732 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC 20401-0001 | www.gpo.gov

Follow GPO on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/USGPO Twitter http://twitter.com/USGPO

and on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/user/gpoprinter.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 29, 2012 No. 12-50

MEDIA CONTACT: GARY SOMERSET 202.512.1957 | cell 202.355.3997 | gsomerset@gpo.gov

GPO AND OFR HONORED FOR DIGITAL 

AUTHENTICATION INITIATIVES

WASHINGTON—The U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO) and the National Archives’ Office of

the Federal Register (OFR) have been honored for the innovative use of public key infrastructure (PKI) 

for authenticating electronic submissions to the Federal Register. The two agencies jointly received a 

Business Value Award from the Four Bridges Forum, a coalition between major Federal agencies, the 

pharmaceutical and healthcare industries, aerospace and defense contractors and colleges and 

universities to facilitate trusted electronic business transactions. GPO and OFR use PKI certificates and 

digital signatures to assure that the content electronically submitted and filed by Federal agencies for 

publication in the Federal Register is authentic. By utilizing PKI technology, GPO and OFR have 

reduced costs, eliminated paper use, and decreased the turnaround time for the submitting and publishing

content in the Federal Register.

PKI facilitates intra-governmental, business-to-business, and business-to-government Internet 

transactions by protecting against identity fraud and eliminating the need for slow and costly paperbased processes.

“PKI is an example of how GPO uses state of the art technologies to best serve our customers and the 

public in an official, digital, and secure way,” said Acting Public Printer Davita Vance-Cooks. “GPO has 

a longstanding partnership with the OFR in making the Federal Register available to the public. Our 

deployment of PKI technology improves the efficiency of producing this important document and 

assures the public that the digital Federal Register is official and authentic.”

GPO is the Federal Government's primary resource for producing, procuring, cataloging, indexing, 

authenticating, disseminating, and preserving the official information products of the U.S. Government 

in both digital and tangible formats. GPO is responsible for the production and distribution of 

information products and services for all three branches of the Federal Government, including U.S. 

passports for the Department of State as well as the official publications of Congress, the White House, 

and other Federal agencies. In addition to publication sales, GPO provides for permanent public access 

to Federal Government information at no charge through GPO’s Federal Digital System 

(www.fdsys.gov) and through partnerships with approximately 1,200 libraries nationwide participating 

in the Federal Depository Library Program. 

For more information, please visit www.gpo.gov.

###