alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 194

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the proposed

tax increase on social security benefits should not be enacted and if

enacted should be repealed.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1993

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. CANADY, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. BAKER of Louisiana, Mr. BLUTE, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr.

WALSH, Mrs. VUCANOVICH, Mr. POMBO, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. INGLIS of

South Carolina, Mr. EMERSON, Mr. ZIMMER, Mr. ROGERS, Mr. BACHUS

of Alabama, Mr. KING, Mrs. FOWLER, Mr. ROTH, Mr. FRANKS of New

Jersey, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. ROYCE, and Mr. KYL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and

Means

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the proposed tax increase on social security benefits

should not be enacted and if enacted should be repealed.

Whereas the House of Representatives has narrowly passed

President Clinton’s budget proposal;

Whereas a diverse of coalition of senior citizen groups, along

with the vast majority of grassroots seniors nationwide,

are opposed to the social security tax increase included

in the budget;
2

•HRES 194 IH

Whereas over 9,000,000 social security recipients will be adversely affected by a social security tax increase proposal;

Whereas those affected by this taxation will pay on average

an extra $483 per year;

Whereas without an inflation adjustment, the percentage of

affected seniors who are in effect taxed twice on the same

income will rise significantly in 5 years;

Whereas the social security tax proposal is the only part of

the President’s plan which concedes to be a targeted tax

increase on a segment of the middle class;

Whereas many fixed income senior citizens cannot be without

these much-needed benefits in this current economic climate;

Whereas senior citizens have historically shared a heavy burden and been the target of numerous measures, such as

a freeze in their cost-of-living adjustment and the implementation of the social security tax; and

Whereas such a tax increase would affect not only current

middle- and upper-class senior citizens but also millions

of future social security beneficiaries: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the proposed increase in tax on social

3 security benefits should not be enacted and if enacted

4 should be repealed.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       67483
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                86386
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  96960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            291800
<PP&E>                                      213617
<DEPRECIATION>                              105181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              523533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       186936
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     12409
<OTHER-SE>                                  324188
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                523533
<SALES>                                    1498124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1490447
<CGS>                                       870151
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               800139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            4703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (184546)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (184546)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (184546)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)


</TABLE>
# April Issuance Summary

# image1.png
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         344,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,590,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   597,000
<INVENTORY>                                    735,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,768,000
<PP&E>                                      55,120,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              31,734,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,014,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,334,000
<BONDS>                                     13,643,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,649,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,014,000
<SALES>                                      6,100,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,100,000
<CGS>                                        2,662,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,515,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             417,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,292,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   476,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            816,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  9,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   807,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.83


</TABLE>
#### Beatrice D. FISTEL, Appellant, v. Lawrence FISTEL, a/k/a Larry Fistel, Appellee.

No. 71-108.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 28, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         113,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,190,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,800
<INVENTORY>                                     26,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,314,300
<PP&E>                                       4,750,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,767,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,537,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,461,100
<BONDS>                                        889,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     21,200
<COMMON>                                       585,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     173,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,537,600
<SALES>                                        396,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               396,800
<CGS>                                          151,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  322,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 10.35**

 

**Summaryof Director Compensation Arrangements**

 

We currently pay each director who is not employed byus or any of our affiliates (i.e., all of our directors except for ourChairman, Frank F. Khulusi) a quarterly retainer of $7,000, plus $2,500 foreach regular board meeting attended in person or telephonically, $1,000 foreach special board meeting attended in person or telephonically and $1,000 foreach committee meeting attended in person or telephonically. We also pay thechairperson of the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors an additionalquarterly retainer of $3,125 and the chairperson of the Compensation Committeeof our Board of Directors an additional quarterly retainer of $1,250 forserving in such capacities. Directors who are employed by us or any of ouraffiliates are not paid any additional compensation for their service on ourBoard of Directors. We reimburse each of our directors for reasonableout-of-pocket expenses that they incur in connection with attending board or committeemeetings. We have entered into indemnification agreements, a form of which isattached as an exhibit to the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K,with each of our directors.

 

Our directors are also eligible to participate in our1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, which is administered by ourCompensation Committee under authority delegated by our Board of Directors. Theterms and conditions of option and stock bonus grants to our non-employeedirectors under our 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, are determined inthe discretion of our Compensation Committee, and must be consistent with theterms of the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, which is filed as anexhibit to the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

The compensation arrangements we have with ourdirectors are reviewed and may be modified from time to time by our Board ofDirectors.

 

Additional information regarding our compensationarrangements with our directors will be included in our definitive ProxyStatement to be filed in connection with our 2010 Annual Meeting ofStockholders.

 

----
|                                 |                                                                                          |                                    |
|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                            |                                                                                          |                                    |
| Date:              May 15, 2007 |                                                                                               | /s/                    Howard S. Modlin |
|                            | Howard              S. Modlin,                                                                |
|                            | Chairman                  of the Board, President andChief                  Executive Officer |

|        |                                                                                                                                                           |                                                               |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                           |                                                               |
|        |                                                                                                                                                                | /s/                        William G.                        Henry |
|   | William                  G. Henry                                                                                                                              |
|   | Vice                      President, Finance and Administration                      and                        Chief Financial                        Officer |

----
#### Herbert RICHARD v. TARPON OIL COMPANY et al.

No. 53095.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 15, 1973.

In re: Herbert Richard applying for cer-tiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 269 So.2d 261.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                   GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY
        Statement of the Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Dollars in Millions)                          Nine Months Ended
                                               September 30, 1999
                                               ------------------
<S>                                            <C>
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income from continuing operations               $     569.6
  Add - Income taxes                                    390.5
      - Fixed charges                                   112.7
                                                  -----------
Adjusted earnings                                 $   1,072.8
                                                  ===========

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                $     107.4
  Portion of rent expense representing interest           5.3
                                                  -----------
Adjusted fixed charges                            $     112.7
                                                  ===========


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                       9.52
</TABLE>
261 La. 1059

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Sylvester JOURNIGAN.

No. 52484.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 1972.

In re; Sylvester Journigan applying for remedial writs.

Treating this appeal as an application for a remedial writ, the application is granted. (See order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Elmo E. Lear, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 18th day of September, 1972, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A. M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
Program No 691-S Term July 1, 2015 To June 30, 2016

TITLE: National Vital Statistics Report

BASIS

ITEM NO. OF AWARD UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT 

I. PREPRESS:(a) Trim/Page-size unit produced from electronic file........per page 650 10.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 3.00 $ 1,950.00 $ 1.00 $ 650.00 $ N

(b) Adobe acrobat PDF soft proof..............................per page 650 2.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 2.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 5.00 $ 3,250.00 $ N

© System Timework...........................................per hour 4 85.00 $ 340.00 $ 50.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 600.00 $ N

II. PRINTING AND BINDING:

(a) Self Covered Saddle Stitch Product...

Printing in four-color process, including binding.........per page

1 Makeready/setup........................................................... 423 38.00 $ 16,074.00 $ 41.56 $ 17,579.88 $ 19.00 $ 8,037.00 $ N

2 Running per 1,000 copies ............................................... 1450 11.00 $ 15,950.00 $ 12.61 $ 18,284.50 $ 14.50 $ 21,025.00 $ N

(b) Separate Covered Perfect Bound Product...... 

Printing in four-color process, including binding.........per page

1 Makeready/setup............................................................ 224 45.00 $ 10,080.00 $ 49.06 $ 10,989.44 $ 12.60 $ 2,822.40 $ N

2 Running per 1,000 copies................................................. 1125 14.00 $ 15,750.00 $ 13.11 $ 14,748.75 $ 11.70 $ 13,162.50 $ N

III. PACKING AND DISTRIBUTION:

1 Bulk shipments (other than by mail):

(a) Packing and sealing shipping containers

per bag, bundle, or container.......................................... 107 2.50 $ 267.50 $ 1.50 $ 160.50 $ 1.00 $ 107.00 $ N

2 Mailed shipments:

(a) Affixing furnished labels

on single copies (self-mailer).........................per 100 labels 350 7.50 $ 2,625.00 $ 6.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 9.00 $ 3,150.00 $ N

(b) Single copy toforeign destinations

in kraft envelopes..........................................per envelope 1108 0.45 $ 498.60 $ 0.25 $ 277.00 $ 0.75 $ 831.00 $ N

CONTRACTOR TOTALS $69,385.10 $67,590.07 $53,634.90 -------

DISCOUNT 1.00% $693.85 3.00% $2,027.70 0.25% $134.09 -------

DISCOUNTED TOTALS $68,691.25 $65,562.37 $53,500.81 -------

AWARDED

NPC, INC.

Claysburg, PA C

ECOPRINT PEA

Silver Spring, MD

GATEWAY PRESS

Louisville, KY
July 28 , 2014

Mr. Ronald Riga Director, Quality Control / Chief Inspector

Sierra Pacific Airlines

7700 North Business Park Drive Tucson, AZ 85743

Dear Mr. Riga :

This i s in response to your January 17, 2014, le tter sent to the public docket

No. FAA

- 2014

- 0052 petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of

Sierra Pacific Airlines (Sierra)

, for an exemption from § 121.1117(e)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The proposed exemption, if granted, would enable Sierra to

conti nue to operate its fleet of two Boeing 737

- 200 series airplanes without meeting the interim compliance date of December 26, 2014, to modify 50% of its fleet to incorporate Ignition Mitigation Means or Flammability Reduction Means required by § 121.1117

.

W e have reviewed your request and have determined that , each of Sierra’ s two airplanes (N703S and N712S) have an applicable airworthiness certificate that predates the applicability date (January 1, 1992)

, set forth in 14 CFR § 26.33. Accordingly, Sierra

Pa cific’s airplanes are excluded from the compliance times specified in 14 CFR
§ 121.1117(d)(1 ) for modification of 50% of its fleet by December 26, 2014. In consideration of the foregoing, we have determined that Sierra does not need an exemption

. We will take

no furthe r action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/ John Barbagallo Acting Deputy Director, F light Standards Service
#### Rabbi Dow ROZENCWAIG, as Executor of the Estate of Bella Le Blanc, Deceased, Petitioner, v. Honorable Arthur W. PRIMM, as Judge, etc., Respondent.

No. 41105.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 10, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 31136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL18-180-000]


VA Solar 1, LLC v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice of 
Complaint

    Take notice that on June 22, 2018, pursuant to sections 206 and 306 
of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e and 825e, and Rule 206 of the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206, VA Solar 1, LLC (Complainant) filed a 
formal complaint against PJM Interconnection, L.L.C (Respondent) 
alleging that the Respondent violated its Open Access Transmission 
Tariff by terminating an interconnection service request submitted on 
behalf of the Complainant, all as more fully explained in the 
complaint.
    The Complainant certifies that copies of the complaint were served 
on the contacts listed for the Respondent in the Commission's list of 
Corporate Officials.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's 
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before 
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and 
protests must be served on the Complainant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
website that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89cfccdbcac6e7e5e0e7ecdafcf9f9e6fbfdc9efecfbeaa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="32747760717d5c5e5b5c57614742425d404672545740511c555d44">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 12, 2018.

    Dated: June 25, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14224 Filed 7-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>