alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dwight BAGWELL v. STATE.

6 Div. 650.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Dec. 11, 1973.

B. J. McPherson, Oneonta, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SIMMONS, Supernumerary Circuit Judge.

Appellant-defendant was indicted and convicted of burglary in the second degree, which is defined and prohibited under Title 14, § 86, Recompiled Code 1958. The trial court fixed the punishment at three years imprisonment. The pertinent part of the indictment reads as follows:

> “ * * * The Grand Jury of said County charge that before the finding of this Indictment Dwight Bagwell did with intent to steal, broke [sic] into and entered [sic] a coin operated washing machine, a structure, or enclosure, specially constructed or made to deep [sic] goods, merchandise, or other valuable things, the property of Fred Crumbly d/b/a Crumbly Coin Laundry, Blountsville, Alabama, contrary to law and against the peace and dignity of the State of Alabama. * * * ”

The subject of the burglary as appears in the indictment was a coin operated washing machine alleged to be a “structure.” The building that houses the washing machine was not made the subject of the alleged burglary. The washing machine, set in motion by the insertion of a coin, is not a “structure” as alleged in the indictment. In Hulbert et al. v. State, 281 Ala. 712, 208 So.2d 92, the Supreme Court, responding to an inquiry by this court, quoted- with approval from Chaney v. State, 225 Ala. 5, 6, 142 So. 104, 105, *451where the court, in discussing Section 3479 of the 1923 Code (now § 86, supra), observed as follows:

> “ ‘Applying the rule of strict construction, applicable to criminal statutes, and the maxim “Ejusdem generis,” our judgment is that a “structure” within the meaning of the statute must have the same characteristics of the structures specifically named in the statute — must consist of four walls and a roof, and, if not resting on the earth’s surface as a floor, must have a floor of other material — and must be susceptible of being entered by a human being. * * * A gasoline pump is not such a structure.’ ” victing the defendant who had been indicted for burglarizing a pay “telephone.”

This court in Hulbert et al. v. State, 44 Ala.App. 300, 208 So.2d 94, responding to the opinion of the Supreme Court, supra, reversed and remanded the judgment con-

Defendant’s motion, made when the state rested, to exclude all the evidence should have been granted. Title 14, § 86, supra, does not make a washing machine the subject of burglary. Failure to grant the motion to exclude was error.

The judgment of conviction and sentence in the instant case is reversed and the cause is remanded.

The foregoing opinion was prepared -by the Hon. Bowen W. Simmons, Supernumerary Circuit Judge, serving as a judge of this Court under § 2 of Act No. 288, July 7, 1945, as amended; his opinion is hereby adopted as that of the Court.

Reversed and remanded.

All the Judges concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERNALLY
PREPARED STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         823,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,213,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   619,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,883,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,124,000
<PP&E>                                       5,541,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,592,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,962,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,417,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       933,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,962,000
<SALES>                                      3,112,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,766,000
<CGS>                                        2,245,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,504,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,896,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                39,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             169,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                158,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            157,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1321

ELLIOTT ROY BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY; SECRETARY OF

THE AIR FORCE; WILNET ASHLEY BROWN,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

JACK B. STEVENS, Judge,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief

District Judge. (CA-01-1484-A)

Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 3, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elliott Roy Brown, Appellant Pro Se. James Christian Stuchell,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Elliot R. Brown appeals from the district court’s denial his

motions to reconsider the district court’s December 13, 2001 order

dismissing his state law claims for declaratory relief, accounting,

and restitution. We affirmed the district court’s December 13, 2001

order on appeal. See Brown v. Circuit Court of Fairfax County, No.

02-1468, 2002 WL 1760769 (4th Cir. July 31, 2002) (unpublished)

(per curiam). Because we have already affirmed the district court’s

disposition of his case, Brown’s further attacks on that order are

barred by principles of res judicata. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument, because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-03-1996
<CASH>                                          12,082
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    129,436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,186
<PP&E>                                         394,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                 169,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 406,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,201
<BONDS>                                        193,262
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,752
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   406,863
<SALES>                                        381,522
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               382,101
<CGS>                                          277,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  277,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,043
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,422)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,422)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,422)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 847 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 847

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 30, 1993

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide for planning and design of a National Air and Space Museum 
         extension at Washington Dulles International Airport.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLAN FOR NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM EXTENSION.

    The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution shall have 
authority to plan and design an extension of the National Air and Space 
Museum at Washington Dulles International Airport.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning 
after September 30, 1993, a total of $8,000,000 to carry out this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 29 (legislative 
      day, June 28), 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 10


PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL

April 26, 2000



Mr. John Appel
[Address]
[Address]


Dear John:

As we have discussed, it is important to GTE that you remain with the company at
least through the closing of the merger. That being the case, if you remain with
GTE at least through the closing (or, if later, June 30, 2000) but separate as a
result of the merger thereafter, GTE will calculate your lump sum pension
benefit using the interest rate as of July 1, 2000 or the interest rate that
would ordinarily be used given your actual separation date, whichever would
provide you with the highest lump sum benefit. This special interest rate
protection will only be applicable if you elect to receive a lump sum pension
distribution following your separation, and any increase in the amount to which
you are entitled as a result of this commitment will be payable from the general
assets of GTE.

John, I want to thank you again for your flexibility. We need your leadership
now - more than ever. I truly appreciate this additional commitment.

Sincerely,



J. Randall MacDonald
Executive Vice President -
Human Resources & Administration

JRM:wh

c:       J. T. D'Angelo, Jr.
         E. D. Singer
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Boy Elijah O’STEEN, Appellee.

No. M-97.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 13, 1970.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and J. Christian Meffert, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

A. C. Soud, Jr., Jacksonville, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

This court having consolidated for appeal this case and 14 others wherein the same defendant was charged with 15 separate offenses arising out of one search and seizure and one arrest, and the same principles of law being applicable, the order appealed from in this case is reversed pursuant to our decision in State of Florida v. O’Steen, 238 So.2d 434, opinion filed this date.

Reversed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000040656
<NAME>                        General Semiconductor Inc

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         5,846
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  62,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                   809
<INVENTORY>                                    40,636
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,342
<PP&E>                                         228,568
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 567,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          60,700
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       370
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   567,986
<SALES>                                        304,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               304,300
<CGS>                                          224,418
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  266,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (58)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             16,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                20,758
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5,190
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            15,568
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   15,568
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.42



</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 384I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 384I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6422 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 384I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6422 September 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2021/C 384 I/01 | Council Decision of 21 September 2021 adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2021 | 1 |
| 2021/C 384 I/02 | Council Decision of 21 September 2021 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Hungary | 3 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2021/C 384 I/01

Council Decision of 21 September 2021 adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2021

1

2021/C 384 I/02

Council Decision of 21 September 2021 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Hungary

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS LEGEND CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         123,845
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,364
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,373)
<INVENTORY>                                     61,186
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               237,151
<PP&E>                                          53,548
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,025)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 593,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,340
<BONDS>                                         53,259
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    207,000
<COMMON>                                        69,124
<OTHER-SE>                                     133,988
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   593,040
<SALES>                                         67,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,642
<CGS>                                           40,596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,388
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,176)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        94
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,270)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,270)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Presidio Trust

# AGENCY:

The Presidio Trust.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Presidio Trust Act, and in accordance with the Presidio Trust's bylaws, notice is hereby given that a public meeting of the Presidio Trust Board of Directors will be held commencing 4:30 p.m. on July 25, 2018, at the Officers' Club, 50 Moraga Avenue, Presidio of San Francisco, California.

The purposes of this meeting are: To provide the Board Chair's report; to provide the Chief Executive Officer's report; to receive selected presentations of concept proposals for development of the Fort Scott site; to receive public comment on the selected concept proposals for the Fort Scott site; to consider and potentially select which proposers will be invited to respond to a Request for Proposal for the Fort Scott site; and to receive public comment on other matters pertaining to Trust business.

Individuals requiring special accommodation at this meeting, such as needing a sign language interpreter, should contact Mollie Matull at 415-561-5300 prior to July 18, 2018.

      ( print page 28873)    

# DATES:

The meeting will begin at 4:30 p.m. on July 25, 2018.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Officers' Club, 50 Moraga Avenue, Presidio of San Francisco.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy J. Koch, General Counsel, the Presidio Trust, 103 Montgomery Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, California 94129-0052, Telephone: 415-561-5300.

Dated: June 15, 2018.

Nancy J. Koch,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2018-13357 Filed 6-20-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P
H. Res. 262

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

October 6, 1993.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 1845) to establish the Biological Survey in the

Department of the Interior. The first reading of the bill shall

be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration of

the bill for failure to comply with section 302(f), 308(a), or

401(b) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are waived.

General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour, with thirty minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, thirty minutes

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources,

and fifteen minutes equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Science, Space, and Technology. After general debate the bill
2

HRES 262 EH

shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. In lieu of the committee amendments now printed in the

bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the

purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report of

the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each

section of the amendment in the nature of a substitute shall

be considered as read. Points of order against the amendment

in the nature of a substitute for failure to comply with clause

5(a) of rule XXI are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and

report the bill to the House with such amendments as may

have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote

in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee

of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature

of a substitute made in order as original text. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.