alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# p^r

- c^r'2X)oo-(ffth 3

,-^.. , , 3^- p I ORTATI C 

## '. H 

## o?^ m m i j^,:'t£ 5 P 1:2 ^ 

# 'K a'Ofian aO %a(aupap a

" E Ho'ohanohan o aE Ho'omau.. . ...T o Hono r

an d T o Perpetuate' ' P O Bo x nil , Kalaapapa , Hawai i 9674 2 Januar y 18 , 201 2 Mr . Denni s DeVany , Chief , Essentia l Air Service s Divisio n U S Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E - W86-30 8 Washington , D C 2059 0 dennis . devany@dot . go v Sen t vi aemai l Dea r Mr . DeVany , Ka'Ghan aO Kalaupap ai s anonprofi t organizatio n mad e u

p o f Kalaupap aresidents , famil y member s an d friends . Ou r missio n i s t o advocate fo

r th e residents , educate th e publi c an d assis t

wit h th e preservatio n o f

histor y o f thi s ver y important

community . I a

m writin g o n behal f

o f th e Boar d o f Director s whic h include s fou r Kalaupap aresidents , si x family members/descendant s an d tw o longtim e friends . A s yo u know , Kalaupap ai s aremote peninsul awhere acces s i s onl y b y hiking/ridin g mule s o n astee p three-mil e clif f trai l or b y smal l plane . Al l th e resident s livin g a

t Kalaupap aar

e abl e to fly , althoug h som e nee d assistance . However , becaus e man

y ar e elderly , the y can n o longer hike th e clif

f trai l - s o th e onl y other wa y t o get i n an d ou t

o f Kalaupap ai s o n th e smal l planes . A fe w year s ago , airfare s ros e to unaffordabl e rates : nearl y $50 0 roundtri p betwee n Honolul u an d Kalaupap aan d eve n nearl y $50 0 betwee n Ho'olehua , Molokai an d Kaluapap a(a n eight-minut e flight). Th e hardshi p o f

suc h hig h airfare s limite d th e abilit y o f peopl e to conduc t

persona l busines s suc h a s renewin g driver' s license s or simpl y to visi t

family . Man y in our 'Ghan awant

to visi t their famil y or thei r famil y grave s in Kalaupapa . Whe n the y wer e tol d tha t th e cos t o f airfar e wa s nearl y $50 0 per

person , the y were shocke d an d saddened .I n th e shor t tim e tha t Makani Ka

i ha s bee n awarde d th e EA S subsidy , th e Kalaupap a communit y an d thos e wh o wis h to visi t Kalaupap ahav e responde d wit h positiv e comments . Airfare s ar

e muc h more affordabl e an d peopl e are please d wit h th e service . Makan i Ka

i ha s bee n especiall y helpful i n workin g wit h th e communit

y t o set it s schedul e t o bes t

mee t thei r needs . W e urg e yo u t o allo w Makani Ka i t o continu e t o receiv e th e EA S subsid y t o improv e ai r trave l t o an d fromKalaupapa . Wit h aloha . Valeri e Monson , Coordinato r BC a'Ghan aO Kalaupap a
is served by mail, three (3) days shall be added to the prescribed period.").

Appellant's notice of appeal, however, was not filed in the district court until March 31, 2015, eight days beyond the relevant appeal period. "[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994).

Under this court's holding in Kellogg v. Journal Communications, if appellant delivered his notice of appeal to a prison official for mailing on or before March 23, 2015, his notice of appeal would be deemed timely filed. 108 Nev. 474, 477, 835 P.2d 12, 13 (1992) (holding that a notice of appeal is deemed "filed" when it is delivered to a prison official). Likewise, NRAP 4(d) provides that a notice of appeal "is timely if it is delivered to a prison official for mailing on or before the last day for filing." NRAP 4(d) further provides that when the prison has a notice of appeal log or another system designed for legal mail, the prisoner must use the logs to receive the benefit of this rule. Because appellant signed his notice of appeal on March 23, 2015, this court directed the attorney general to obtain and transmit a copy of the notice of appeal log. If appellant did not use the notice of appeal log, the attorney general was to inform this court whether appellant used any other logs.

On June 3, 2015, the attorney general submitted a timely response. The attorney general indicates that the prison maintains both a notice of appeal log and a legal mail log. It appears that appellant did not use the notice of appeal log, but did use the legal mail log on March 24, 2015, one day after the date appellant's notice of appeal was due. This court's decision in Kellogg contemplates that the date of delivery of the notice of appeal to a prison official will be determined by the date recorded

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 ((I) 1947A 

### ein the prison mail log. 

### Id. at 476-77, 835 P.2d at 13. Because appellant's

notice of appeal was untimely delivered to prison officials, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Saitta

Gibboris Pickering

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Marvin D. Perkins Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 3
(0) 1947A 44e47/
#### Earl William JONES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42264.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 6, 1972.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
256 La. 846

#### Curley L. MARCOTTE et al. v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO. et al.

No. 50770.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 30, 1970.

In re: Curley L. Marcotte et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 236 So.2d 587.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

Writ granted, but limited to assignment of error no. 5.
Exhibit 99.1








July 13, 2016Analyst Contact:Megan Patterson918-561-5325Media Contact:Stephanie Higgins918-591-5026





ONEOK and ONEOK Partners Second-quarter


2016 Conference Call and Webcast Scheduled





TULSA, Okla. – July 13, 2016 – ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) and ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will release second-quarter 2016 earnings after the market closes on Aug. 2, 2016.





ONEOK’s and ONEOK Partners’ executive management will participate in a joint conference call the following day at 10 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (9 a.m. Central Daylight Time) on Aug. 3, 2016. The call also will be carried live on ONEOK’s and ONEOK Partners’ websites.





To participate in the telephone conference call, dial 888-600-4861, pass code 4836580, or log on to www.oneok.com or www.oneokpartners.com .





|      |                                                                 
|----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|What: | ONEOK and ONEOK Partners second-quarter 2016 earnings conference

call and webcast





|      |                              
|----- | -----------------------------
|When: | 10 a.m. Eastern, Aug. 3, 2016

9 a.m. Central





|       |                                                       
|------ | ------------------------------------------------------
|Where: | 1) Phone conference call: dial 888-600-4861, pass code

48365808944381


2) Log on to the webcast at www.oneok.com


3) Log on to the webcast at www.oneokpartners.com





If you are unable to participate in the conference call or the webcast, the replay will be available on ONEOK’s website, www.oneok.com , and ONEOK Partners’ website, www.oneokpartners.com , for 30 days.  A recording will be available by phone for seven days.   The playback call may be accessed at 888-203-1112, pass code 4836580.








ONEOK, Inc. (pronounced ONE-OAK) (NYSE: OKE) is the general partner and as of March 31, 2016, owns 41.2 percent of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS), one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, which owns one of the nation's premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-








-more-


---






ONEOK and ONEOK Partners Second-quarter 2016


Conference Call and Webcast Scheduled





Page 2





Continent, Permian and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. ONEOK is a FORTUNE 500 company and is included in Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500 Stock Index.





For more information, visit the websites at www.oneok.com or www.oneokpartners.com .





For the latest news about ONEOK and ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKNews and @ONEOKPartners .





###
Exhibit 8.1
     List of
    subsidiaries1
  Legal Entity

Country of IncorporationSubsidiaries of ASML Holding N.V.:ASML Netherlands B.V.

Netherlands (Veldhoven)ASML MaskTools B.V.

Netherlands (Veldhoven)ASML Systems B.V.

Netherlands (Veldhoven)ASML Germany GmbH

Germany (Dresden)ASML France S.a.r.l.

France (Montbonnot)ASML (UK) Ltd.

UK (Paisley (Scotland))ASML Israel (2001) Ltd.

Israel (Ramat-Gan)ASML Ireland Ltd.

Ireland (Dublin)ASML Dublin Ltd.

Ireland (Dublin)ASML Italy S.r.l

Italy (Avezzano)ASML Hong Kong Ltd.

Hong Kong SARASML Singapore Pte. Ltd.

SingaporeASML Korea Co. Ltd.

Korea (Kyunggi-Do)ASML Japan Co. Ltd.

Japan (Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa-Ken)ASML Lithography Facilities Science and Technology Co. Ltd.
    2

China (Tianjin)ASML Taiwan Ltd.

Taiwan (Hsinchu)ASML Equipment Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.

Malaysia (Penang)ASML Belgium BVBA

Belgium (Essen)ASML Belgium Finance CV

Belgium
    (Essen)3Brion Technologies (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.

China (Shenzhen)Subsidiary of ASML Belgium Finance CV:ASML US Inc.

US (Delaware)Subsidiaries of ASML US, Inc.:ASML Capital US, Inc.

US (Delaware)ASML MaskTools Inc.

US (Delaware)Brion Technologies, Inc.

US (Delaware)ASML Participation US Inc.

US (Tempe)Lehrer Pearson Inc.

US (Richmond)ASML Ventures 1 Inc.

US (Tempe)Subsidiaries of Brion Technologies, Inc:Brion Technologies Int.

Cayman Islands (Georgetown)Subsidiary of ASML Hong Kong Ltd.:ASML Hong Kong Logistic Services Ltd.

Hong Kong SAR   1
    
    All of the Companys
    subsidiaries are directly or indirectly wholly-owned.2
    
    ASML (Tianjin) Co Ltd. was renamed
    to ASML Lithography Facilities Science and Technology Co. Ltd.
    as of August 3, 2010.3
    
    Limited partnership with ASML
    Belgium BVBA as managing partner and ASML Holding N.V. as
    limited partner.  ASML ANNUAL REPORT 2010
Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
RSI Systems Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(Commission File number 33-95912) on Form S-8 of RSI Systems, Inc. of our report
dated September 30, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of RSI
Systems, Inc. and subsidiary as of June 30, 1996 and 1995 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
the years then ended and the period from December 31, 1993 (inception) through
June 30, 1994, which report appears in the June 30,1996 annual report on Form
10-KSB of RSI Systems, Inc.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
October 15, 1996
**Docket No. FAA -**  **2012 -**  **0189**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                      $2,740,810
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   $6,992
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $2,758,529
<PP&E>                                        $106,448
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $3,218,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          $51,008
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        $1,169
<OTHER-SE>                                  $3,165,830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                $3,218,007
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               $34,795
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $251,529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             $(216,734)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         $(216,734)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                $(216,734)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   $(.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $(.19)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

 Petitioner,

 v.

CARA E. GRUSZECKI 

A/K/A CARA GRUSZECKI-SMALLEY,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 1541 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 161 DB 2009

Attorney Registration No. 89229

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 2023, on certification by the Disciplinary Board 

that Cara E. Gruszecki, a/k/a Cara Gruszecki-Smalley, who was suspended for a period 

of six months, has filed a verified statement showing compliance with the order of 

suspension and Pa.R.D.E. 217, and there being no other outstanding order of suspension 

or disbarment, Cara E. Gruszecki a/k/a Cara Gruszecki-Smalley shall be returned to 

administrative suspension.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,079
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,050,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                    919,459
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,291,691
<PP&E>                                         630,357
<DEPRECIATION>                                 286,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,970,702
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,937,742
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        200
<COMMON>                                        15,003
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,242,236)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,970,702
<SALES>                                     68,761,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            68,761,760
<CGS>                                       67,566,287
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               67,566,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,452,861
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             432,271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (6,680,264)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (6,680,264)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,576,442)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.46)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Sierra Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Denis Atkins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 22, 2008

/s/ Dennis AtkinsDennis AtkinsChief Financial Officer





1

---
| Area Code/County             | Count |
|------------------------------|-------|
| 458  Oregon                  | 66    |
| 503  Oregon                  | 19313 |
| 541  Oregon                  | 13169 |
| 971  Oregon                  | 1746  |
| Baker Oregon                 | 240   |
| Benton Oregon                | 1389  |
| Clackamas Oregon             | 6329  |
| Clatsop Oregon               | 837   |
| Columbia Oregon              | 1138  |
| Coos Oregon                  | 1283  |
| Crook Oregon                 | 244   |
| Curry Oregon                 | 584   |
| Deschutes Oregon             | 2323  |
| Douglas Oregon               | 1135  |
| Gilliam Oregon               | 12    |
| Grant Oregon                 | 41    |
| Harney Oregon                | 137   |
| Hood River Oregon            | 371   |
| Jackson Oregon               | 2479  |
| Jefferson Oregon             | 285   |
| Josephine Oregon             | 1219  |
| Klamath Oregon               | 600   |
| Lake Oregon                  | 47    |
| Lane Oregon                  | 5472  |
| Lincoln Oregon               | 984   |
| Linn Oregon                  | 2060  |
| Malheur Oregon               | 135   |
| Marion Oregon                | 3222  |
| Morrow Oregon                | 56    |
| Multnomah Oregon             | 12921 |
| No Zip Code Reported, Oregon | 457   |
| Polk Oregon                  | 1073  |
| Sherman Oregon               | 35    |
| Tillamook Oregon             | 547   |
| Umatilla Oregon              | 603   |
| Union Oregon                 | 285   |
| Wallowa Oregon               | 88    |
| Wasco Oregon                 | 581   |
| Washington Oregon            | 8399  |
| Wheeler Oregon               | 9     |
| Yamhill Oregon               | 1207  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          21,787
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  332,338
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,363
<INVENTORY>                                     30,568
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,731,830
<PP&E>                                       4,222,729
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,371,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,747,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,849,858
<BONDS>                                        821,040
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     21,195
<COMMON>                                       585,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,747,356
<SALES>                                        771,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               771,183
<CGS>                                          272,035
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  579,901
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   441
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                160,101
<INCOME-TAX>                                    63,258
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             96,843
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    96,843
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
#### Melvin OUTLER and Martha Outler, his wife, Appellants, v. Hyman BERMAN, Appellee.

No. 69-822.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 28, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 20, 1970.

Julius H. Erstling, South Miami, and R. M. MacArthur, Miami, for appellant.

Pincus, Moss & Savitt, North Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a trial court order that set aside and vacated a final judgment which had been rendered on the basis of a prior default judgment.

The trial court, after hearing, determined that there was ineffective service of process on the defendant Hyman Berman. Based on its finding of ineffective service of process, the trial court found that it lacked jurisdiction over the person of the defendant Berman and ruled that the final judgment which it had previously rendered was void ab initio. Plaintiffs appeal from that order.

An examination of the record on appeal reflects that service of process was attempted on the defendant Hyman Berman pursuant to § 47.13, Fla.Stat., now § 48.031, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

There was substantial, competent evidence upon which the trial judge could find that the usual place of abode of the defendant was in Van Nuys, California at the time that substituted service of process was attempted upon him in this action. See State ex rel. Merritt v. Heffernan, 142 Fla. 496, 195 So. 145 (1940).

Generally, a judgment that is void because of a lack of jurisdiction over a defendant may be set aside or vacated at any time. Gay v. McCaughan, Fla.1958, 105 So.2d 771; Sawyer v. State, 94 Fla. 60, 113 So. 736 (1927); and Rule 1.540(b) (4), “RCP”, 31 F.S.A. See also McIntosh v. Wibbeler, Fla.1958, 106 So.2d 195. We find that there was sufficient, competent evidence in the record and reasonable inferences therefrom which support the *725chancellor’s findings. See Goldstein v. Pettinger, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 740.

The order herein appealed is, therefore,

Affirmed.
#### INDUSTRY STANDARD ROOFING, INC., and Sam Powell, Appellants, v. EAST COAST SUPPLY CORP., f/k/a East Coast Supply Corp. of Brevard County, Appellee.

No. 69-468.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 22, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James C. Downey, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
259 La. 739

#### Lillie Betrece SINGLETON v. A SECOND MORTGAGE COMPANY OF BATON ROUGE, INC.

No. 51754.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 22, 1971.

In re: Lillie Betrece Singleton applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ refused. Insufficient showing to justify the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
No. 174.

#### J. L. Lancaster et al., Receivers of the Texas & Pacific Railway *v.*H. L. Smith et al.

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Texas.

Submitted January 4,1926.

Decided January 11, 1926.

*Messrs. T. D. Gresham*and *Robert L. W. Thompson*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Thornton H'ardie*for defendants in error.

*Per Curiam.*

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; *Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton,*252 U. S. 1, 5, 6. Petition for certiorari denied.