alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### COURTNEY TOTTEN v. W. H. KIPP.1

May 5, 1916.

Nos. 19,693—(94).

Work and labor — finding sustained by evidence.

This is an action for wages. The defense was that the contract was an entire one for a definite time and that plaintiff quit without cause before the term was over. The court found the defense not proven. The evidence was conflicting but the finding is abundantly sustained.

Action in the municipal court of St. Paul to recover $108 for work and labor. The case was tried before Boerner, J., who made findings' and ordered judgment for $103 in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying his motion to amend the findings or for judgment in his favor, or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

Affirmed.

*S. A. Ryan and George Qaliill,*for appellant.

*Orr, Stark &*Kidder, for respondent.

1

 Reported in 157 N. W. 713.

*460Hallam, J.

This is an action to recover wages. Plaintiff worked for defendant as a farm laborer from May 18 to September *22,*1915. The monthly wage was agreed upon. The amount earned aggregated $120. Only $12.50 has been paid. The court gave judgment for the balance. The work was satisfactorily done. The only defense pleaded is that plaintiff hired out to defendant “'for a period extending **** * until after the harvest of crops was fully completed,” that the wages were “to be paid only when work was finished,” and that plaintiff quit without cause before that time. In other words, the claim is that there was an entire contract of hiring for the season, no pay to be due until the season was over, and that plaintiff did not fully perform his contract. The defense pleaded was a good one, but the court found that it was not proven. The evidence is in conflict. Plaintiff denies such a contract in positive terms. The evidence of defendant as to what the parties agreed was for some reason stricken out without objection. Defendant’s son testified to admissions made by plaintiff of an entire contract. The parties admittedly did not act on the theory that no payment was to be due until the end of the season. Payments from time to time were repeatedly offered and promised by defendant, and some were made. The evidence abundantly sustains the finding of the trial court that no definite period of hiring was agreed.

Order affirmed.
#### Walter R. CRAVER, Appellant, v. Wayne C. NELSON, Ancillary Administrator ad Litem, c. t. a., of the Estate of Frank T. McClure, Deceased, Appellee.

Nos. 71-61, 71-62.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 21, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# L_2013233EN.01S00302.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 233/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 233/s3

---

NOTE TO READERS — WAY OF REFERRING TO ACTS

As of 1 July 2013 the way of referring to acts has changed.

During a transitional period this new practice will coexist with the previous one.

---
#### Ramon Antonio SANTIAGO, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, etc., Respondent.

No. 73-429.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 11, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
House Calendar No. 12

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 103

[Report No. 103–18]

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R.

compensation program, and for other purposes.920) to extend the emergency unemployment

FEBRUARY 23, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 12

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 103

[Report No. 103–18]

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 920) to extend the emergency

unemployment compensation program, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 23, 1993

Mr. BONIOR, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 920) to

extend the emergency unemployment compensation program, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R.

3 920) to extend the emergency unemployment compensa4 tion program, and for other purposes. The amendment

5 recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means

6 printed in the bill and the amendment printed in the re7 port of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolu-
2

HRES 103 RH

1 tion shall be considered as adopted. All points of order

2 against the bill, as amended, and against its consideration

3 are waived. Debate on the bill shall not exceed two hours

4 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank5 ing minority member of the Committee on Ways and

6 Means. The previous question shall be considered as or7 dered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without

8 intervening motion except one motion to recommit.
#### GREENWOOD SANITATION COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John P. WHITTINGTON, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11954.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Oct. 18, 1972.

R. Clyde Lawton, Jr., Vivian, for plaintiff-appellant.

Peters & Ward by Hugh T. Ward, Shreveport, for defendant-appellee.

Before AYRES, BOLIN and HALL, JJ.

BOLIN, Judge.

In this suit a final judgment was signed and filed on February 25, 1972 rejecting plaintiff’s demands for damages and granting judgment in favor of plaintiff in re-convention for $1,554.00. A notice of judgment was mailed to plaintiff through its attorney of record on February 28, 1972. No application for a new trial was filed. On April 14, 1972 a devolutive appeal was granted in favor of plaintiff, returnable June 12, 1972, and the appeal bond was filed on June 5, 1972. The transcript was lodged in this court on June 12, 1972 and defendant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on June 13, 1972.

*332The brief in support of the motion to dismiss correctly states that the three-day delay for applying for a new trial commenced on February 29, 1972 and expired on March 2, 1972. Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 1974. The 90-day period for perfecting a devolutive appeal commenced on March 3, 1972 and expired on May 31, 1972. The bond, which was not filed until June S, 1972, was untimely and the appeal was not perfected within the ninety days allowed under Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2087. Accordingly, this appeal should be dismissed.

Additionally, when this case was called for argument, in the manner and at the time prescribed in the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, Rule V, Section 4, the appellant neither appeared nor filed a brief prior to such time; accordingly, the appeal is considered abandoned and should be dismissed. Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 2162 and Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, Rule VII, Section 5(b), as revised June 1, 1971.

For the two reasons heretofore stated the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.
#### Lessee of RETURAH CANNON et al. *vs.*WILLIAM CANNON, et al.

Amendment.

This was an action for mesne profits, after a recovery in ejectment; and it appearing that no judgment had been entered on the verdict in ejectment—the plaintiff was nonsuited; but

*The Court,*

on motion, allowed judgment to be entered nunc pro tune.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 12
GTE Northwest Incorporated and Subsidiary

STATEMENT OF THE CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Three Months
                                                                       Ended
                                                                     March 31,
                                                                       1998
                                                                   ------------
<S>                                                                <C>         
 Net earnings available for fixed charges:
   Income before extraordinary charge                              $     51,283
   Add - Income taxes                                                    33,527
        - Fixed charges                                                  16,751
                                                                   ------------
 Adjusted earnings                                                 $    101,561
                                                                   ============

 Fixed charges:
   Interest expense                                                $     15,376
   Portion of rent expense representing interest                          1,375
                                                                   ------------
 Adjusted fixed charges                                            $     16,751
                                                                   ============

 RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                        6.06
 </TABLE>
Exh. 10.57






Exhibit 10.57










March 11, 2014


Ms. Catherine M. Vaczy, Esq.
140 East 28th Street
#11C
New York, New York 10021


Dear Catherine:


This letter serves as an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the employment agreement between you and NeoStem, Inc. (the “Company”) dated as of January 26, 2007 (the “2007 Agreement”), as thereafter amended by amendments on January 9, 2008, August 29, 2008, reinstated and extended on July 8, 2009, extended on July 7, 2010, extended on January 6, 2012, extended on November 13, 2012 and extended and further amended on July 12, 2013 (the 2007 Agreement as so amended and extended, the “Original Agreement”) pursuant to which you serve as the Company’s General Counsel.  Except as set forth herein, the Original Agreement shall remain unchanged.  Initially capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Original Agreement.
Base Salary.  As of January 1, 2014 your annual Base Salary was increased to $296,000.00 and shall remain as such through December 31, 2014.
The Company represents that this Amendment has been approved by the Company’s Compensation Committee.
If the terms of this Amendment are acceptable to you please sign where indicated below. It is understood and acknowledged that a fax signature will be considered to be valid as an original.


                                                   Very truly yours,


                                                   NEOSTEM, INC.


                                                   By: /s/ Robin L. Smith
                                                               Name:  Robin L. Smith, M.D.
                                                                               Title:  Chief Executive Officer






Agreed to and accepted:


/s/ Catherine Vaczy
Catherine M. Vaczy, Esq.
#### Carl J. WEIL and Margaret J. Weil, jointly and severally, t/a Caremar Enterprises, Appellants, v. BURNUP & SIMS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-60.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 26, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Thomas E. Sholts, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 99.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

June 26,
2003

Securities
and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

The
certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code. This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A.'s Annual Report on
Form 20-F (the "Report") accompanying this letter.

Messers
Pio Bussolotto, Alfonso Iozzo and Luigi Maranzana, the Managing Directors and Mr. Carlo Giuseppe Angelini, the Head of the Accounting Department of Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A., each
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|/s/ Pio BussolottoPio Bussolotto
Managing Director                               |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Alfonso IozzoAlfonso Iozzo
Managing Director                                 |  | 
|/s/Luigi MaranzanaLuigi Maranzana
Managing Director                              |  | 
|/s/ Carlo Giuseppe AngeliniCarlo Giuseppe Angelini
Head of Accounting Department |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic
version of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), has been provided to Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A. and will be retained by Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
#### Michael V. SEALY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. EE-280.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 7, 1977.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and Theodore Mack, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
House Calendar No. 28

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 150

[Report No. 103–53]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI

tions reported from the Committee on Ruleswith respect to consideration of certain resoluAPRIL 1, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 28

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 150

[Report No. 103–53]

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to consideration

of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 1, 1993

Mr. DERRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect

to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the

Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule

2 XI for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to resolutions reported

5 on the legislative days of April 2 or April 3, 1993, to pro6 vide for the consideration or disposition of the bill (H.R.

7 1335) making emergency supplemental appropriations for
2

HRES 150 RH

1 the fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for other

2 purposes, any amendment thereto, any conference report

3 thereon, or any amendment reported in disagreement from

4 a conference thereon.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Eugene HARRIS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 54392.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 1, 1974.

In re: Eugene Harris applying for writs of habeas corups, certiorari, prohibition and other remedial writs.

Writ refused. The judgment of the trial judge is correct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              81
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      321
<ALLOWANCES>                                        30
<INVENTORY>                                         27
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,709
<PP&E>                                           4,957
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,046
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,819
<BONDS>                                            892
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           585
<OTHER-SE>                                         239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,020
<SALES>                                          1,246
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,246
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    213
<INCOME-TAX>                                        83
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                130
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       130
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
MARQUIS A. CORBITT

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FI LED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 1436

Opinion filed May 3, 2017.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

-- Original

Jurisdiction

.

Marquis A. Corbitt, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

WETHERELL, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Ann K. MEHMERT, Appellant, v. Thomas M. MEHMERT, Appellee.

No. 71-710.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 21, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Elaine HALL, Appellant, v. Wallace L. BOSTWICK, Appellee.

No. 69-718.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 23.1

                            INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Prologic Management Systems, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-89384-LA) on Form S-8 of Prologic Management Systems, Inc. of our report
dated June 27, 1997, except for the first paragraph of Note 15 to the
consolidated financial statements, which is as of July 17, 1997, relating to
the consolidated balance sheet of Prologic Management Systems, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the two-year period ended March 31, 1997, which report appears in the
March 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Prologic Management Systems,
Inc. 

Our report dated June 27, 1997, except for the first paragraph of Note 15 to
the consolidated financial statements, which is as of July 17, 1997, contains
an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has continued uses of cash from operating activities
that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

                                             
                                                KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
August 11, 1997
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-92981 onForm S-4 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-101518, 333-60768, 333-5493,333-26785, 333-69811, 333-69813, 333-87279 and 333-35534 on Form S-8 ofour report dated April 29, 2005, relating to management’s report of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K/A of SOURCECORP, Incorporated for the yearended December 31, 2004.

 

*DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP*

 

Dallas, TexasApril 29, 2005

 

1

----
<PAGE>

Exhibit 4.7 Robert Scarpetta, Kevin Reilly and Barry Elkin's agreement to accept
stock in lieu of payroll.


July 31, 2001


Steve Williams, President & CEO
CFI Mortgage, Inc.
601 Cleveland St., Suite 500
Clearwater, FL 33755


Dear Steve:

Please accept this as authorization to issue 20,500 shares of CFI common stock
to Robert Scarpetta and Kevin Reilly, and 25,000 shares of CFI common stock to
Barry Elkin in lieu of our salary. We further agree that the shares will not be
issued until the entire amount has been remitted to the company.

Sincerely,

                                                     CFI Mortgage, Inc.
/s/  Robert Scarpetta                                /s/ Stephen E. Williams
Robert Scarpetta                                     Title:  President

/s/  Kevin Reilly
Kevin Reilly

/s/  Barry Elkin
Barry Elkin
p130069.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0069

Focus Ready Draft 11/19/2012

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ EV

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1
p130069.eng

 

SAT (concerns) (11/09/2012):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Related Cases:

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P1B1T1 .

Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb.),

No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 2
p130069.eng

Page 3
p130069.eng

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0069

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 4
p130069.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0069

Page 5
p130069.eng

 

 

 

 

 

Page 6
p130069.eng

 

 

 

 

Page 7