P. 1


# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 223 ) IV-C-19

0 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:21:03 AM Sheet 223 of 232P. 2

I ! ! 

### I S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 

## D£C 

## i 7 1391 

# A-f7~if

OFF!C = O " AI R AN D RADIAT1C N


### Jerr yEdward s G M Provin g Ground s 31W-VE L Mi'lford , M I 4838 0
Dea r Mr . Edwards : Her e i s th e complet e inde x fo r al l th e onboar d relate d materia l requeste d unde r FOI ARIN:6479-91 . I'v e als o enclose d copie s o f tw o releasabl e document s whic hw e photocopie d ifnternally . A s w e discussed , pleas e not e tha t anymaterial s w e hav e relate d t o onboar d safet yconcern s wer e recentl yrelease d i n a n FOI Areques t fro mAP I an d ar e no wavailabl e i n th e publi c docke t fo r thi s rule . W e wil l b e i n contac t wit hyo u concernin g evaporativ e emissio n control s material s whic hwer e als o requeste d b yGenera l Motors . W e wil l provid e a bil l fo r charge s fo r searc han d revie wtim e onc e al l action s o n th e reques t hav e bee n completed . Pleas e phon e m e a t (313 ) 668-840 8 i f yo u hav e an yquestions . Sincerel yyours ,
Glen n W . Passavant , Senio r Projec t Manage r Standard s Suppor t an d Developmen t Branc h Enclosure s 

# E %

I M I 6 89 2 IPAASR DOC K0

- 

### SERIA L #

B00 1
C004 C005 C00 6 C00 8 C00 9 C01 0 D00 5 F00 1
F00 2 F00 3 F00 4 SUBJEC T DAT E

Memo : Measuremen t o f 10/4/9 0 fue l spitbac k a s a functio n o f fue l flo wrat e Summar yo f Tes t Proce dur e Discussio n Briefing-Tes t Procedur e Note—Tes t Procedur e Briefing-Tes t Procedur e Draft-Emptyin g Losse s Misc . Han d Writte n Note s Note s o n Tes t Procedur e Tes t Packet . Tes t # 89-442 3
Tes t Packet . Tes t # 389-450 5 3/6/9 1 1/17/9 1 1/10/9 1 12/17/9 0 N/ A N/ A 3/19/9 1 7/26/8 9
7/27/8 9
Tes t Packet . Tes t # 7/28/8 9 89-453 3 (Stoc k Veh . @95F ) Tes t Packet . Tes t # 8/02/8 9 T O Greave s
N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A
N/ A FRO M

Platt e
N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A Freema n Freema n Bryso n E& D

E& D
E& D E& D TOPI C # 5
8 8 8 8 7 7 8 3
3 3 3 DISPOSITION

Deliberative Materia l Deliberative Materia l n*=> l -iv*^r-at

- iV P 

### Materia l Deliberative Materia l De l iberative Materia l Deliberative Materia l rv_> 1 -il-*_vra1--ivpa 

### Materia l Deliberative Materia l Releasabl e
Releasabl e Releasabl e Releasabl e

### 89-450 6 (OB Tauru s @95F )

F00 5 Tes t Packet . Tes t # 7/25/8 9

89-442 2 (OB Tauru s @95F ) E& D Releasabl e F00 6 Tes t Packet . Tes t # 7/21/8 9

89-442 1 (OB Tauru s @95F ) E& D Releasabl e F00 7 Pressur e Trace s fro mO B 2/5/91 , 2/6/91 ,

Tauru s Fueling s @ EPA , 2/7/9 1 Commercia l Station . Heav yDut y Releasabl e
F00 8

F01 2 Packe t o f Press . Trace s

fro m O B Tauru s Fueling s EP Aplu s note s o n fue l tan k "rust" . 1 trac e 10/25/90 , 4 trace s 10/31/90 , 5 trace s 10/29/90 , 2 trace s 10/30/90 . E& D

Pee r Revie wdraf t o f 9/10/9 1 Hutchin s technica l repor t "Applicatio n o f Onboar d Refuelin g Emissio n Contro l Syste mt o a 198 8 For d Tauru s Vehicle " Wyso r Releasabl e

F00 9 F01 0 F01 1 Not e

Not e Not e 10/17/9 0 10/18/9 0 10/31/9 0 Hutchin s

Anderso n Anderso n Anderso n

Hutchin s Hutichin s 1 1 1 Releasabl e

Releasabl e Releasabl e 

## Deliberativ e Materia l

F01 3 Pee r Revie wdraf t o f 9/12/9 1 Hutchin s

technica l repor t "Applicatio n o f Onboar d Refuelin g Emissio n Contro l Syste mt o a 198 8 For d Tauru s Vehicle " 

## Passavan t Deliberativ e Materia l

F01 4 Pee r Revie wdraf t o f 9/12/9 1 Hutchin s

technica l repor t "Applicatio n o f Onboar d Refuelin g Emissio n Contro l Syste mt o a 198 8 For d Tauru s Vehicle " 

## Kopinsk i Deliberativ e Materia l

### F01 5

F02 2 Memo . For d Tauru s wit h

Onboar d System ; Hig h Temperatur e Dat a Collectio n 6/26/8 9 Platt e Hutchin s

Memo . Evaluatio n o f th e 12/12/9 0 Anderso n Hurle y performanc e o f th e Onboar d Tauru s usin g 1 ful l tan k o f commercia l regula r unleade d fue l (wit hattachments ) 1, 3 Releasabl e
F01 6 F01 7 F01 8 F01 9 F02 0 F02 1 198 8 Ligh t Dut yVehicl e

Analysis , Tes t # 89450 5 19 8 8 Ligh t Dut yVehicl e Analysis , Tes t # 89442 3 19 8 8 Ligh t Dut yVehicl e Analysis , Tes t # 89442 2 19 8 8 Ligh t Dut yVehicl e Analysis , Tes t # 89442 1 19 8 8 Ligh t Dut yVehicl e Analysis , Tes t # 89453 3 7/27/8 9 7/27/8 9 7/26/8 9 7/24/8 9 7/28/8 9 N/ A

N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A
Han d writte n note s o n 7/19-21/8 9 N/ A caniste r weight , hig htemp , cel l tests . E& D E& D
E& D E& D E& D Hutchin s 3 3 3 3 3 1 Releasabl e

Releasabl e Releasabl e Releasabl e Releasabl e Releasabl e Releasabl e

F02 3 Memo . Evaluatio n o f th e 12/27/9 0 Anderso n Hurle y

performanc e o f th e Onboar d Tauru s usin g 1 ful l tan k o f commercia l premiu munleade d fue l (9 3 octane ) (wit hattachments ) Releasabl e

F02 4 Memo . T o evaluat e th e 11/28/9 0 Anderso n Hurle y

performanc e o f th e Onboar d Tauru s usin g 1 ful l tan k o f ga s (Indolen e tes t fuel ) (wit h attachment s an d "post-i t notes" ) Releasabl e

F02 5 Memo . NHTS AEvaluation

- 10/31/9 0 Wilso n 

## Gra y Deliberativ e

T J

### F02 6

G00 9 EP AOnboar d Ca r

Memo . Onboar d Tauru s - 11/15/8 9 Gra y Testin g Wit hFue l a t Hig hTemperatur e Hutchin s

Letter : On—Boar d Implementatio n 9/4/9 1 Sprat t Wilso n Materia l Releasabl e F02 7 F02 8 F02 9 G00 1 G00 2 G00 3 G00 4
G00 5 G00 7 G00 8 Memo . Evaluatio n o f Ho t

Ambien t Testin g fo r th e 9/22/8 9 Anderso n Onboar d Tauru s Memo . Gasoline , Diese l 8/24/8 9 an d Methano l Refuelin g Emission s Note . Onboar d Vehicl e Evaluatio n Updat e 2/8/9 1
Memo : Litigatio n N/ A Scenerio s fo r Onboar d Refuelin g Actio n Mem o Note : On—Boar d Rul e Letter : Availabitil y o f On-Boar d system s Receive d wit hMar k out s N/ A N/ A 4/8/9 1 Briefing : On-Boar d 5/23/9 1 contro l o f refuelin g emission s Letter : On-Boar d Implementatio n Letter : On—Boar d Imp1emen t a t io n 9/4/9 1 9/4/9 1 Hurle y

Gra yHutchin s

—Dat a Collectio n Anderso n Franc e Wilso n Kopinsk i N/ A
N/ A Derric k Greg g Hutchin s

Goldhan d Rosenbur g Silverma n Brownle e
N/ A Wilso n Rile y 2 6 2, 4 1 1 1 2,3, 6
8 1 1 Releasabl e

Releasabl e Releasabl e Deliberative Materia l D<_> 1 i h^vrat - i v* » 

### Materia l Deliberative Materia l Deliberative Materia l

r H1 iVva-rat-i-wpa 

### Materia l Releasabl e Releasabl e Releasabl e

### G01 0

G02 2 Letter : Fue l tank s

Bladde r Meetin g 9/23/9 1 Passavan t Oconne r Releasabl e

On-Boar d T P issue s w/margina l note s 1/10/9 1 N/ A N/ A 8 G01 1 G01 2 G01 3 G01 4 G01 5
G01 6 G01 7
G01 8
G01 9 G02 0 Letter : On-Boar d

Implementatio n Letter : On-Boar d Implementatio n Letter : On-Boar d Implementatio n Briefing : On-Boar d tes t procedure s Newsletter : Syste mfo r controllin g Eva p & refuelin g emissio n Draf t Memo : Refuelin g emission s tes t proc . 7/17/9 1 7/2/9 1 6/12/9 1 3/19/9 1 8/9 0
N/ A
Memo : Procedura l & N/ A substantiv e requirement s fo r On-Boar d refuelin g rulemakin g Note : Summar yo f On-Boar d tes t pro cedur e discussio n Briefing : T P discussio n Han d Writte n Note s Cap—of f vapo r releas e 2/27/9 1
2/27/9 1 1/17/9 1 Marti n

Reill y Reill y N/ A N/ A
N/ A Wilso n
N/ A
N/ A N/ A Wilso n

Greg g Marti n N/ A Bluche r

MO D Goldhan d Kopinsk i
N/ A Kopinsk i 1 1 1 8 1
8 1
8
8 1 Releasabl e

Releasabl e Releasabl e
T*__- l - i T~*_vr»hi v< = 

### Materia l Releasabl e Withou t Note s Deliberative Materia l Deliberative Materai l Deliberative Materia l Deliberative Materia l Releasabl e Deliberative Materia l• *



### G02 4

G02 6 G02 7
G02 8 G02 9 G03 1 H00 1 H00 2 H00 4 LOO l L00 4 LOI O M00 2 Lis t o f GA O question s

fo r 3/20/9 1 meetin g Outlin e fo r SNPR M Draf t
Note : Vehicl e refuelin g an d gasolin e reformulation s w/note s On-Boar d T P issue s w/note s Outlin e SNPR M w/note s N/ A 12/6/9 0 1/18/9 1
1-8-9 1 1/8 9 Draft : Notic e o f 1/2/9 1 Worksho p an d Reopenin g o f Commen t Memo : Revie wo f 5/23/9 1 4/10/9 1 Refuelin g NPR M Change s Memo : Propose d Emissio n Refuelin g Tes t Procedur e Memo : On—Boar d Tes t Procedure s Draft : Notice—Reopenin g o f Commen t perio d Draf t portio n o f O/ B Worksho p Notic e HWN-Con f cal l w/OAQP S Notificatio n o f sui t fo r Failur e t o Promulgat e On
4/4/9 1 1/25/9 1 5/30/9 1 N/ A 2/4/9 1 9/25/9 1 -Boar d SDS B

N/ A
Passavan t
N/ A N/ A N/ A Perio d Greave s Franc e Franc e N/ A N/ A N/ A Reill y GA O

N/ A Shed d
N/ A N/ A N/ A Rya n Tesorier o Kopinsk i N/ A Johnso n Johnso n Eas t Coas t Corp . 1 1 1
8 1 1 8 8 8rH 

### 1, 6 1 1 rw=-

l i hara t i ire* 

### Materia l Deliberative Materia l Releasabl e
Deliberative Materia l Delibera t iv

e Materia l Deliberative Materia l Deliberative Materia l Deliberative Materia l Deliberative Materia l Deliberative Materia l Deliberative Materia l Releasabl e Releasabl e

### M00 4 Notic e o f Publi c Hearin g 8/27/9 1 N/ A an d RP T Availabilit y N/ A Releasabl e , . r>nJ( M00 5 M00 6 M00 9 M01 0 M01 4 N00 1 N00 2 N00 5 N00 6 N00 9 N01 3 POO l Draf t o f notic e & rp t 8/9 1

summar yo f chnge d circumstance s Draf t notic e w/actio n mem o Notic e o f reopenin g o f commen t perio d Notic e o f reopenin g o f commen t perio d 7/29/9 1 7/9 1 6/6/9 1
Eva p caniste r vapo r N/ A fire s followin g NHTS Aimpac t cras h Misc . Han d Writte n note s Fax-Tes t Procedur e Letter-Tes t Procedur e Note s Relate d t o Refuel
in g Emission s Testin g Briefing-Tes t Procedur e Draf t Refuelin g Tes t Tes t Procedure s Memo-CAA AProvision s r e Onboar d & Eva p 3/91-5/9 1 3/26/9 1 4/24/9 1 4/30/9 1 undate d 3/9 1 10/12/9 0 N/ A

Wilso n N/ A N/ A

tes t N/ A Rya n Tesorier o N/ A N/ A N/ A
Franc e N/ A

N/ A N/ A N/ A

Breto n Breto n Moor e Breto n Greave s Goether t Barb a 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 8 8 8 8 1 Deliberative

Materia l Deliberative Materia l Deliberative Materia l Deliberative Materia l Deliberative Materia l Deliberative Materia l Deliberative Materia l Releasabl e Releasabl e Releasabl e Deliberative Materia l Releasabl e P00 2 Memo-TR C Repor t o n AP I 10/23/9 0 Passavan t Barb a Releasabl e

### P003

S00 4 Tes t Vehicl e

Breakthr u Analysi s Char t 4/4/0 1 N/ A N/ A

Memo-Repor t b yMulti

- 5/2/9 1 Franc e nationa l Lega l Service s et.al . Goldhan d Releasabl e P004 P005 Q00 1 R00 2 S00 1 S00 2 S00 3 Inf o Request-AP I Veh .

Note-API/Exxo n Vehicle s Note—Averag e Fil l Leve l Lette r t o NHTS A Mis c Han d writte n note s Memo—Onboar d Refuelin g Lega l Issues-Ca p of f Provision s 9/3/9 1 9/12/9 1 6/24/9 1 6/20/8 9 11/27/9 0 undate d undate d Franc e

Wilso n Platt e Li u N/ A Franc e N/ A Zinge r

Barb a Lindhje m Anderso n N/ A Goldhan d N/ A 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 Releasabl e

Releasabl e Releasabl e Releasabl e n*_» l -iV*_vr»HT7»_ > 

### Materia l Deliberative Materia l r*_> i •iv-*a-|~_ t t--j-w i 

### Materia l 

## Deliberativ e Materia l

# root

REQUESTO R ID : 1722 1

NAME : R . BRANHA M REPOR T TIME : 11:15:4 0

DATE : JU L 20 , 198 9 TES T # 89442 3

VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NREPOR T - (TESTN O GEN ) DAT E O F ENTR Y 10/14/8 8
VEHICL E SPECIFICATION S
MANUFACTURE R VEHICL E I D / VE R REPRESENTE D CARLIN E MODE L COD E DRIV E COD E SOURC E A193XEX-091 5 0 SEDA NFRON T DRIV E ST R . LEF T EP A FOR D DRIV E AX L W T EQUIV . VEHICL E —YEAR —FUL L EMPT Y CUR B INERTI ATES T TYP E ACTUA L VEHICL E MODE L MD L AC T TAN K TAN K WEIGH T CLAS S WEIGH T H.P . METHO D ET W C D . SID E O D AC T A C RUNNIN G CH G VE H FA NC D D NH P H P NUMBE R E F 1FABP52V3JG25951 7 8 8 8 8 350 0 362 5 N O ENTR Y

ASSIGNE D D F O R DURABILIT Y VEHICL E I D ALTERNAT E MANUFACTURE R ODOMETE R CORRECTIO NTIR E 8 , RI M INITIA L FACTO R SIZE S 6. 6 TIR E SPECIFICATION S SW L BL T PS I T D MF R CONST R NM NM F T R R D P P205/75R1 4

DISPLACEMEN T BOR E STROK E O.O E 0. 0 E 0. 0 E #\ #2 RATE D H P ENGIN E

TYP E ENGIN E SPECIFICATION S

ENGIN E CONFIGURATIO N NO . CVL . NO . TOTA L

CARB S BBL S FUE L SYSTE M FUE L TURBO/SUPE R COMP . COAS T

MFR/MOOE L IN J CHARGER,COOLIN G RATI O D NT M OTT O SPAR K YE S IGNITIO NTIMIN G DE G TOL . RP M RP M TOL . GEA R LEF T - IDL E % C O RIGH T COM B TOL . RP M - - IDL E RP M TOL . GEA R FAMIL Y NON E ENGIN E SYSTE M 0. 0

COD E

DRIV E TRAI NAN D CONTRO L SYSTE M SPECIFICATION S AXL E N/ V

A/ C RATI O RATI O ODOMETE R INSTALLE D EXHAUS T TYP E CRANKCAS E —TRANSMISSIO N— SHIF T INDIC . EVAPORATIO N SYSTE M CONFI G MODI F COD E LIGH T SYSTE M 0. 0 0. 0 YE S A- 3 MAIN-TAN K AUX.-TAN K CAPACIT Y VOLUM E CAPACIT Y VOLUM E SHIF T SPEE D SHIF T SCH . I D CIT Y HW Y -N O ENTR Y

EVAPORATIV E EMISSIO N FAMIL Y COD E FUE L TYP E UNLEADE D (A T EPA-IN D HO )

SALE S CLAS S 1 8 .6 G 7.4 G B FT A $ CONTRO L SYSTE M TYPE S N O SALE S CLAS S SPECIFIE D

VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NCOMMENT S * SE E COMMENT S

1853 7

# s^ 1


### 3 ° l 

### , 

### o U l D ' , O > u 1 a

i - - i 

# Mi

u - ' 1 I •

, u i 1 > - 1 u -



### ' " 2

1 p.1 2

a

j i 1 • * 2 J
. \

J a1

1 U1

* ( D > O < ° r - U 1

. m 

### 2 5 

### » o z1

a l

, u i > ^ >

J O 0 1 - , 1/

1 ' 1 S i 1 o

1 z 1 z 2 > 0 - 

# \X \ a- i c _ z i : > *

-

1 ^ ' 1 ^

z " J ' 

# !s \ ./) U £• 2 a l ,

a l ; 1/ 1 -7 u i 2 2 o a a l u i i/ i

>
o z I 1 u i ' \a\ o

1 1 \

j ' i 1

_ . 1 3' i 5 1

u l 1 

### £

1 o - , u l 1

, u i ' Iz 1 IK ' Z 1 , 1 a l 1 z" * 1 1 

## S ' \

O \

j s o 1 , a i «

1 a - l > ^ ' Z<-> .

1 ^ 1 s o (/

) tf» \ - 1 u - C 0 1 J o
, tt z o o o 1 * 1 * ~ C l 

# i l l u i 1 u i > 0 . > 

## £ \

a i ' 

## S i S i 1

_ 1 1 o ' tt u i 1 

## £ \ u l 1 2 " 1 

### ? , 1 o 1



# f^ ' :\ tt^ '
: 1 <- > 1

0\ a i 1 u i ' 0 . ' u i 1 z o o < 1 1

0 \

Il- < 1 1 " J \ 1 ^ a i I o 1 ' ! \

1 a.
u i 1 » -! J a. tt

a \ *. 1

a i ' , v

- 1 c

u l 1

> < 

## 8 t \

• * ' tt 1 ^ \

1 1

a l 1
tt ' O '

3 -> c o 5 - i n a a. 1 < - 1 u - 1 • "

1 1 1 J >

I D I tt 

## 2 - a l ' ^



# - °
u i ' 1 u i _ 1

O 1

tt o
0 \

U l 1 u i 1 < t 1 z

* 1 ° -t . I C J I a . ' u i » O S 1 2 ^ \

Z * " 1 u i O 1

1 1 u i ' a . 1 

# y
u i 1 

# 5\
U i 'I I o a l J z ^ \

1 ^ Iu i 1 > u i 1 

# _? 1 

# n

•* " 1 a - 1 rf. 1 o 1

a1

* 1 2

o a o o » « .



## - - ° z < - l u. 2 \o 

## i* « 

## ° < - ' 1 3

1 a l

2 * ' a. 1 u 1 t o C O U O C D

\ SDYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T # 89442 3 198 8 LIGH T DUT Y VEHICL E ANALYSI S | PROCESSED : 11:07:3 2 JU L 27 , 198 9

MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . VERSIO NEVA P 03 0 A193XEX-091 5 0 N MF R . REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y ALT . H . P . MET H PARTIC
ULATE S N REASO NFO R

CONFIRMATIO N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA G B Y BA G CUR B DR V

AXL E AXL E PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E 07-25-8 9 EMPT Y tt\ IGNITIO N # 2 TIMIN G /

RP M GEA R IDL E - % C O HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA K COASTDOW NTIM E RP M GEA R PERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0

' AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO X CV S "H G POIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO R ALDEHYDE S RG E 29 . 2 5 / 45 . 3 96. 7 D 17. 4 45.8 2 0.879 4

DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S / DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R TES T DAT E H R SIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) 07-26-8 9 1 3 D20 9 362 5 4. 0 45.0 0 9646. 4 27 C SYSTE M MILE S N/ A BA G 1 7.42 3 MILE S 11.94 6 K M 17307 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O RANG E

1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 EXHAUS T SAMPL E METE R 4 2 . 8- ' 45.4-' ' 37 . 1 ir 40. 0 ^ BACKGROUN D SAMPL E

CONC . 3 1 .7 2 22.5 2 0.82 2 168.9 8 RANG E

14 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4.7 ^ 0.3 / 1.8 ^ 0.0 ^ CONC .

3.4 2 0.1 5 0.03 7 0. 0 SECS .

CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 28.5 2 PP M 22.3 8 PP M 0.78 8 % 168.9 8 PP M VMIX = 749 6 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 3.4 9 7.9 9 3059.6 2 4 1 .7 6 GMS/M I

0.47 0 1 .07 6 4 1 2 . 18 8 5.62 6 GMS/K M

0.29 2 0.66 9 256.12 2 3.49 6 FACTO R = 15.90 4

AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 21. 0 8.9 2 11. 2
BA G 2 7.48 1 MILE S 12.03 9 K M 17442 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E SECS . VMIX = 7447. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.44 1 CORRECTE D MAS S EMISSION S AUX . AUX . AU X . HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O BA G 3 7.50 8 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O COMMENTS : O N RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 MILE S METE R

12 . 2 - ^ 5 0 . 1- / 36.2- ^ 3 1 .7 ^ 12.08 3 K M CONC .

8.9 1 24.8 7 0.80 1 131.2 8 17505 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 BOAR D METE R y~

10. 3 ^ 52. 9 36.2y , 21. 2 CONC .

7.5 1 26 . 2 7 0.80 1 85.7 9 VE H 3 LA4 S BAC K RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 3 0.3 ^ 1 .7 ^ 0 . 0 - ^ ROL L REVS . CONC . 3.1 3 0.1 5 0.03 5 0. 0
BACKGROUN D SAMPL E RANG E 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 T O BAC K METE R

4.3- 1 0.3- ' 0.0 / CONC .

3.1 3 0.1 5 0.03 7 0. 0 RE D TAURU S CONCENTRATION S 5.9 8 PP M 24.7 3 PP M 0.76 8 % 131.2 8 PP M

SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 4.5 8 PP M 26.1 3 PP M 0.76 6 % 85.7 9 PP M GMS . 0.7 3 8.7 7 2963.9 4 32.2 3 VMIX = 742 9 GMS/M I

0.09 7 1.17 2 396.20 7 4.30 9 0 CU.FT . GMS/K M

0.06 0 0 . 72 9 246.19 2 2.67 7 DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 0.5 6 9.2 4 2949.2 7 21.0 1 GMS/M I

0.07 4 1.23 1 392.82 7 2.79 9 GMS/K M

0.04 6 0.76 5 244.09 1 1 .73 9 FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E

MP G KP L L/100K M 22. 0 9.3 5 10. 7
FACTO R = 16.53 6 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 22. 3 9.4 9 10. 5

TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T89-442 3| 198 8 DAT AINPU T -QC/QA
- AN D ERROR S REPOR T

DYN O SITE : D20 9 TES T tt 89-442 3 PROCESSED : 11:07:3 2 JU L 27 , 198 9 TES T CONDITIONS : TES T PACKE T STATUS : DISPOSITIONS : DAT E MM-DD-Y Y TIM E HR:M NNO T VALIDATE D VEHICL E DISP : TEST : 07-26-8 9 KEY-START : 13:3 0 CER T TES T DISP : PREP : 07-25-8 9 KEY-OFF : 15:3 0 F.E . TES T DISP : CALCULATE D SOA K PERIO D = 22. 0 I.D . TITL E NAM E DEPT . NUMBE R VOI D CODES : REQUESTO R R . BRANHA M ECT D 1722 1 INSPECTO R INVALI D I.D . LAB : AM APRE P INVALI D I.D . LA 4 PRE P INVALI D I.D . CERT : DIURNA L INVALI D I.D . DRIVE R INVALI D I.D . 5476 8 Q.C. : SIT E OPER . INVALI D I.D . 5472 1 DAT AVAL . INVALI D I.D . HOT-SOA K INVALI D I.D . INSTRUMEN T USAGES : PRE P DYNO : ALTERNAT E HFI D SIT E NO. : TES T DYNO :
PRE P DYN O SITE : PRETES T ADJUSTMENTS : WARNING , N O INPU T INDICATOR S FO R ADJUSTMENT S QC/Q ACHECKS : OU T O F TOLERANC E CHECKS : 2 , 6 , 47 , 48 , INPU T DAT ACHECKS : N O DAT AINPU T ERROR S FLAGGE D FO R THI S TES T CALCULATIO NERRORS : N O CALCULATIO NERROR S FLAGGE D FO R THI S TES T COMMENTS : O NBOAR D VE H 3 LA4 S BAC K T O BAC K RE D TAURU S

3/1B G LA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 3

1853 7 0 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89-442 3

T J i >DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89442 3 198 8 LIGH T DUT YVEHICL E ANALYSI S | PROCESSED : 11:07:3 2 JU L 27 . 198 9

MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . VERSIO N EVA P 03 0 A193XEX-091 5 0 N MFR . REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC ULATE S N REASO N

FO R CONFIRMATIO N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA GB YBA G CUR B DRV

AXL E AXL E PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E 07-25-8 9 EMPT Y / IGNITIO N TIMIN G/ # 1 0 2 RP M GEA R IDL E - % C O HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA KCOASTDOW N TIM E RP M GEA RPERIO DACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W

AM B TEM P %

RE L S.HU M

NO XCV S "H GPOIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO RALDEHYDE S RG E 29.2 5 45. 3 96. 7 D17. 4 45.8 2 0.B79 4 27 C / DYNAMOMETE RTES T CONDITION S /

DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE RSYSTE M TES T DAT E H RSIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S 07-26-8 9 1 3 D20 9 362 5 4. 0 45.0 0 9646. 4 N/ A BA G1 7.42 3 MILE S 11.94 6 KM 17307 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R 42. 8 45. 4 37 . 1 40. 0 CONC .

3 1 .7 2 22.5 2 0.82 2 168.9 8 BACKGROUN DSAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 7 0. 3 1 . 8 0. 0 SECS . VMIX = 7496. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N FACTO R= 15.90 4 CONC . 3.4 2 0 . 1 5 0.03 7 0. 0 CORRECTE D

CONCENTRATION S GMS . 28.5 2 PP M

3.4 9 22.3 8 PP M

7.9 9 0.78 8 % 3059.6 2 168.9 8 PP M

41.7 6 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.47 0 1 .07 6 412 . 18 8 5.62 6 GMS/K M

0.2 9 2 0.66 9 256.12 2 3.49 6 AUX .

FIELD 1 AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 21. 0 KP L

8.9 2 L/100K M

11. 2
BA G2 7.48 1 MILE S 12.03 9 K M 17442 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

12. 2 50 . 1 36. 2 31. 7 CONC .

8.9 1 24.8 7 0.80 1 131.2 8 BACKGROUN DSAMPL E SECS . VMIX = 7447. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N FACTO R= 16.44 1 CORRECTE D RANG E METE RCONC . CONCENTRATION S 1 4 4. 3 3.1 3 5.9 8 PP M 1 5 0. 3 0.1 5 24.7 3 PP M 2 3 1. 7 0.03 5 0.76 8 % 1 8 0. 0 0. 0 131.2 8 PP M GMS . 0.7 3 8.7 7 2963.9 4 32.2 3 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.09 7 1.17 2 396.20 7 4.30 9 GMS/K M

0.06 0 0.72 9 246.19 2 2.67 7 AUX .

FIELD 1 AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22. 0 KP L

9.3 5 L / 100K M

10. 7
BA G3 7.50 8 MILE S 12.08 3 KM 17505 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7429. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N FACTO R= 16.53 6 SIT E 0A2O 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

10. 3 52. 9 36. 2 2 1 . 2 CONC .

7.5 1 26.2 7 0.80 1 85.7 9 BACKGROUN DSAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 3 0. 3 1 . 8 0. 0 CONC .

3.1 3 0 . 1 5 0.03 7 0. 0 CORRECTE D

CONCENTRATION S 4.5 8 PP M 26.1 3 PP M 0.76 6 % 85.7 9 PP M GMS . 0.5 6 9.2 4 2949.2 7 21.0 1 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.07 4 1 .23 1 392.82 7 2.79 9 GMS/K M

0.04 6 0.76 5 244.09 1 1 .73 9 AUX .

FIELD 1 AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22. 3 KP L

9.4 9 L/100K M

10. 5 COMMENTS : O N

BOAR DVE H 3 LA4 S BAC KT O BAC KRE DTAURU S 3/1B GLA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 3 TH E FUE L ECONOM YVALU E WA S CALCULATE DUSIN GCONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-442 3

u iOYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89442 3 198 8 LIGH T DUT Y VEHICL E ANALYSI S | PROCESSED : 11:07:4 1 JU L 27 , 198 9

MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . VERSIO NEVA P 03 0 A193XEX-091 5 0 N MF R . REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y AL T . H.P . MET H PARTIC
ULATE S N REASO NFO R

CONFIRMATIO N / TES TTYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES TPROCEDUR E BA G B YBA G CUR B DR V

AXL E AXL E PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E 07-25-8 9 EMPT Y tt\ IGNITIO NTIMIN G / *2 RP M GEA R IDL E - % C O HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA K COASTDOW NTIM E RP M GEA R PERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO X CV S "H G POIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO R ALDEHYDE S RG E 29.2 5 45. 3 96. 7 D 17. 4 45.8 2 0.879 4 27 C / DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S /

DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R SYSTE M TES T DAT E H R SIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S 07-26-8 9 1 3 D20 9 362 5 4. 0 45.0 0 9646. 4 N/ A BA G 1 7.42 3 E **A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O MILE S 1 1 .94 6 K M 17307 .

EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R CONC . 42. 8 31.7 2 45. 4 22.5 2 37. 1 0.82 2 40. 0 168.9 8 ROL L REVS . BACKGROUN D RANG E 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 7 0. 3 1 . 8 0. 0 SECS .

*PL E CORRECTE D CONC . CONCENTRATION S 3.4 2 28.5 2 PP M 0.1 5 22.3 8 PP M 0.03 7 0.78 8 % 0. 0 168.9 8 PP M MIX = 749 6 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 3.4 9 7.9 9 3059.6 2 41.7 6 GMS/M I

0.47 0 1 . J7 6 412.18 8 5 . 62 6 GMS/K M

0.29 2 0.66 9 256.12 2 3.49 6 FACTO R = 15.90 4

AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 21. 0 8.9 2 11. 2
BA G 2 7.48 1 MILE S 12.03 9 K M 17442 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O RANG E

1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

12. 2 50 . 1 36. 2 31. 7 CONC .

8.9 1 24.8 7 0.80 1 131.2 8 RANG E

1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 3 0. 3 1 . 7 0. 0 SECS . VMIX = 7447. 0 CU.FT . CORRECTE D DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.44 1 CONC . CONCENTRATION S 3.1 3 5.9 8 PP M 0.1 5 24.7 3 PP M 0.03 5 0.76 8 % 0. 0 131.2 8 PP M MAS S EMISSION S AUX . AUX . AUX . GMS . 0.7 3 8.7 7 963.9 4 32 . 2 3 GMS/M I

0.09 7 1.17 2 396.20 7 4.30 9 GMS/K M

0 .06 0 0 . 72 9 246.19 2 2.67 7 FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E

MP G KP L L/100K M 22. 0 9.3 5 10. 7
BA G 3 7.50 8 MILE S 12.08 3 K M 17505 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7429. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.53 6 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

10. 3 52. 9 36. 2 21. 2 CONC .

7.5 1 26.2 7 0.80 1 85.7 9 BACKGROUN D SAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 3 0. 3 1 . 8 0. 0 CONC .

3.1 3 0.1 5 0.03 7 0. 0 CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 4.5 8 PP M 26.1 3 PP M 0.76 6 % 85.7 9 PP M GMS . 0.5 6 9.2 4 2949.2 7 21.0 1 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.07 4 1 . 23 1 392.82 7 2 .79 9 GMS/K M

0.04 6 0.76 5 244.09 1 1 .73 9 AUX .

FIELD 1 AUX . AU X .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22. 3 KP L

9.4 9 L / 100K M

10. 5 COMMENTS : O NBOAR D VE H 3 LA4 S BAC K T O BAC K RE D TAURU S

3/1B G LA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 3 TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SIT£:D20 9 TES T 89-442 3DYN O SITE : D20 9 TES T tt 89-442 3
TES T CONDITIONS : DAT E MM-DD-Y Y TIM E TEST : 07-26-8 9 KEY-START : PREP : 07-25-8 9 KEY-OFF : CALCULATE D SOA K PERIO D = H R :MN 13:3 0 15:3 0 22. 0 I.D . TITL E NAM E REQUESTO R INSPECTO R AM APRE P LA 4 PRE P DIURNA L DRIVE R SIT E OPER . DAT AVAL . HOT-SOA K R . BRANHA M

INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D I

I I I I I I I D D D D D D D D
ALTERNAT E HFI D SIT E NO. : DEP T . ECT D 198 8 DAT AINPU T -QC/QA
- AN D ERROR S REPOR T

TES T PACKE T STATUS : NO T VALIDATE D

NUMBE R 172 2 1

5476 8 5472 1 PROCESSED : 11:07:4 1 JU L 21, 198 9 DISPOS1TIONS : VEHICL E DISP : CER T TES T DISP : F.E . TES T DISP :

VOI D CODES : LAB : CERT : Q.C . : INSTRUMEN T USAGES : PRE P DYNO : TES T DYNO :
PRE P DYN O SITE : PRETES T ADJUSTMENTS : WARNING . N O INPU T INDICATOR S FO R ADJUSTMENT S QC/Q ACHECKS : OU T O F TOLERANC E CHECKS : 2 , 6 , 47 , 48 , INPU T DAT ACHECKS : N O DAT AINPU T ERROR S FLAGGE D FO R THI S TES T CALCULATIO NERRORS : N O CALCULATIO NERROR S FLAGGE D FO R THI S TES T COMMENTS : O NBOAR D VE H 3 LA4 S BAC K T O BAC K RE D TAURU S

3/1B G LA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 3

1853 7 0 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T It 89-442 3

# F"coz

• * REQUESTO R ID : 1233 6 TES Ttt 89450 5 NAME : C
. FULLE R REPOR T TIME : 15:10:2 0

DATE : JU L 25 , 198 9 VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NREPOR T - (TESTN O GEN ) - DAT E O F ENTR Y : 10/14/8 8 VEHICL E SPECIFICATION S MANUFACTURE R VEHICL E I D / VE R REPRESENTE D CARLIN E MODE L COD E DRIV E COD E SOURC E FOR D A193XEX-091 5 0 SEDANFRON T DRIV E STR . LEF T EP A DRIV E AX L W T EQUIV . ET W VEHICL E —YEAR- - FUL L EMPT Y CUR B INERTI ATES T CD . SID E O D AC T A C RUNNIN G CH G TYP E ACTUA L VEHICL E MODE L MD L AC T TAN K TANK WEIGH T CLAS S WEIGH T H.P . METHO D VE H FA NC D D

NH P H P NUMBE R E F 1FABP52V3JG25951 7 8 8 8 8 350 0 362 5 NO ENTR Y 6. 6 ODOMETE R TIR E SPECIFICATION S CORRECTIO NTIR E & RI M SW L BL T PS I T D ASSIGNE D D F OR DURABILIT Y VEHICL E I D ALTERNAT E MANUFACTURE R INITIA L FACTO R SIZE S MF R CONST R NM NM F T R R D P P205/75R1 4 ENGIN E SPECIFICATION S RATE D ENGIN E ENGIN E NO . NO . TOTA L FUE L SYSTE M FUE L TURBO/SUPE R COMP . COAS T DISPLACEMEN T BOR E STROK E H P TYP E CONFIGURATIO NCYL . CARB S BBL S MFR/MODE L IN J CHARGER.COOLIN G RATI O DNT M O.O E O.O E O.O E OTT O SPAR K YE S NON E 0. 0

IGNITIO NTIMIN G IDL E %C O IDL E ENGIN E # 1 # 2 DE G TOL . RP M RP M TOL . GEA R LEF T RIGH T COM B TOL . RP M RP M TOL . GEAR FAMIL Y SYSTE M COD E

^ DRIV E TRAI NAN D CONTRO L SYSTE M SPECIFICATION S AXL E N/ V

A/ C CRANKCAS E —TRANSMISSIO N—SHIF T INDIC . EVAPORATIO N RATI O RATI O ODOMETE R INSTALLE D EXHAUS T TYP E SYSTE M CONFI G MODI F COD E LIGH T SYSTE M FUE L TYP E 0. 0 0. 0 YE S A- 3 -NO ENTR Y UNLEADE D (A T EPA-IN D HO ) MAIN-TAN K AUX.-TAN K SHIF T SCH . I D EVAPORATIV E EMISSIO N CAPACIT Y VOLUM E CAPACIT Y VOLUM E SHIF T SPEE D CIT Y HW Y FAMIL Y COD E SALE S CLAS S 18.6 G 7.4 G B FTAN O SALE S CLAS S SPECIFIE D $ CONTRO L SYSTE M TYPE S

VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NCOMMENT S * SE E COMMENT S

1853 7 0DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89450 5 198 8 LIGH T DUT Y VEHICL E ANALYSI S PROCESSED : 15:50:5 6 JU L 27 , 198 9

MF R . COD E VEHICL E I.D . VERSIO NEVA P 03 0 A193XEX-091 5 0 N MFR . REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC
ULATE S N REASO NFO R

CONFIRMATIO N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA G B Y BA G CUR B DR V

AXL E AXL E PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E 07-26-8 9 EMPT Y / IGNITIO NTIMIN G / # 1 # 2 RP M GEA R IDL E - % C O HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA K COASTDOW NTIM E RP M GEA R PERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO X CV S "H G POIN T TEM P UN.I T HU M GR/L B FACTO R ALDEHYDE S RG E 29.0 9 46. 7 96. 2 D 18. 6 48.6 1 0.889 6 27 C / DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S /

DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R SYSTE M TES T DAT E H R SIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S 07-27-8 9 1 3 D20 9 362 5 4. 0 45.0 0 9668. 4 N/ A BA G 1 7.40 5 MILE S 11.91 7 K M 17265 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

37. 6 42. 9 37. 5 4 2 . 1 BACKGROUN D SAMPL E SECS . VMIX = 7446. 0 CU.FT . CORRECTE D CONC . 2 7 .8 1 2 1 . 2 7 0.83 2 178.7 8 RANG E METE R CONC . CONCENTRATION S

1 4 4. 4 3.2 0 24.8 2 PP M 1 5 0. 2 0.1 0 21.1 8 PP M 2 3 1. 7 0.03 5 0.79 9 % 1 8 0. 0 0. 0 178.7 8 PP M MAS S EMISSION S DILUTIO N FACTO R AUX
. 15.71 5

AUX . AU X . GM S . 3.0 2 7.6 0 3083.6 9 43.8 9 GMS/M I

0 .40 7 1 .02 6 416.44 1 5.92 7 GMS/K M

0 . 25 3 0.63 8 258.76 4 3.68 3 FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E

MP G KP L L/100K M 20. 8 8.8 3 11. 3
BA G 2 7.42 2 MILE S 11.94 4 K M 17304 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E

RANG E METE R CONC . RANG E METE R CONC . 1 4 11. 9 8.6 9 1 4 4. 2 3.0 5 1 5 46. 9 23.2 7 1 5 0. 2 0.1 0 2 3 36. 0 0.79 6 2 3 1. 6 0.03 3 1 8 32. 7 135.7 3 1 8 0. 0 0. 0 SECS . VMIX = 7396. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.52 9 CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 5.8 2 PP M 23.1 8 PP M 0.76 5 % 135.7 3 PP M GMS . 0 . 7 0 8 . 2 6 2932.7 7 33 . 1 0 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.09 5 1.11 3 395.16 7 4 . 4 6 0 GMS/K M

0.05 9 0.6 9 1 245.54 6 2.77 1 AUX .

FIELD 1 AUX . AU X .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22. 0 KP L

9.3 7 L/1OOK M

10. 7
BA G 3 7.49 2 MILE S 12.05 7 K M 17468 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E METE R 1 4 10. 4 1 5 52. 8 2 3 36. 2 1 8 24. 1 BACKGROUN D SAMPL E

CONC . 7.5 9 26.2 2 0.80 1 98 . 1 3 RANG E

1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 0 0. 2 1 . 7 0. 0 SECS . VMIX = 7375. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.51 1 CORRECTE D CONC . CONCENTRATION S 2.9 1 4.8 6 PP M 0.1 0 26.1 3 PP M 0.03 5 0.76 B % 0. 0 98.1 3 PP M MAS S EMISSION S AU X . AUX . AUX . GMS . 0.5 8 9.2 8 2935.2 5 23.8 6 GMS/M I

0. 0 7 8 1 . 23 9 3 9 1. 18 B 3.18 ? GMS/K M

0.04 9 0.77 0 243.44 6 1 .97 9 FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E

MP G KP L L/100K M 22. 3 9.5 0 10. 5 COMMENTS : O NBOAR D VE H 3 LA-4 S BAC K T O BAC K RE D TAURU S

3/1B G LA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 4 TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T89-450 5 T I c oD\'N O SITE:D20 9 TES T # 89450 5 198 8 LIGH T DUT Y VEHICL E ANALYSI S PROCESSED : 15:50:5 8 JU L 27 , 198 9

MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . VERSIO NEVA P 03 0 A193XEX-091 5 0 N MFR . REP . INITIA L RU N.

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC
ULATE S N REASO NFO R

CONFIRMATIO N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA G B V BA G CUR B DR V

AXL E AXL E / IGNITIO NTIMIN G / / % C O PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E # 1 # 2 RP M GEA R IDL E HIG H SPEE D 07-26-8 9 EMPT Y IDL E SOA K COASTDOW NTIM E RP M GEA R PERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO X CV S "H G POIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO R ALDEHYDE S RG E 29.0 9 46. 7 96. 2 D 18. 6 48.6 1 0.889 6 27 C / DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S /

DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R SYSTE M TES T DAT E H R SIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S 07-27-8 9 1 3 D20 9 362 5 4. 0 45.0 0 9668. 4 N/ A BA G 1 7.40 5 MILE S 11.91 7 K M 17265 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O RANG E

1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R 37. 6 42. 9 37. 5 4 2 . 1 CONC .

2 7 .8 1 21.2 7 0.83 2 178.7 8 RANG E

1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 4 0. 2 1 . 7 0. 0 SECS . VMIX = 7446. 0 CU.FT . CORRECTE D MAS S EMISSION S DILUTIO NFACTO R AUX . 15.71 5

AUX . AUX . CONC . CONCENTRATION S GMS . 3.2 0 24.8 2 PP M 3.0 2 0.1 0 21.1 8 PP M 7.6 0 0.03 5 0.79 9 %3083.6 9 0. 0 178.7 8 PP M 43.8 9 GMS/M I 0 .40" ' 1 .02 6 416.44 1 5.92 7 GMS/K M

0 . 25 3 0.63 8 258.76 4 3.68 3 FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E

MP G KP L L/100K M 20. 8 8.8 3 11. 3
BA G 2 7.42 2 MILE S 11.94 4 K M 17304 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O RANG E

14 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

1 1 . 9 46. 9 36. 0 32. 7 CONC .

8.6 9 23 . 2 7 0.79 6 135.7 3 RANG E

14 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 2 0. 2 1 . 6 0. 0 SECS . VMIX = 7396. 0 CU.F T DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.52 9 CORRECTE D CONC . CONCENTRATION S 3.0 5 5.B 2 PP M 0.1 0 23.1 8 PP M 0.03 3 0.76 5 % 0. 0 135.7 3 PP M MAS S EMISSION S AUX . AUX . AUX . GMS . 0.7 0 8.2 6 2932.7 7 33 . 1 0 GMS/M I

0.09 5 1.11 3 395.16 7 4 . 46 0 GMS/K M

0.05 9 0.69 1 245.54 6 2.77 1 FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E

MP G KP L L/100K M 22. 0 9.3 7 10. 7
BA G 3 7.49 2 MILE S 12.05 7 K M 17468 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7375. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.51 1 E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

10. 4 52. 8 36. 2 24 . 1 CONC .

7.5 9 26.2 2 0.80 1 9 8 . 1 3 BACKGROUN D

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 0 0. 2 1 . 7 0. 0 SAMPL E

CONC . 2.9 1 0.1 0 0.03 5 0. 0 CORRECTE D

CONCENTRATION S 4.8 6 PP M 26.1 3 PP M 0.76 8 % 98.1 3 PP M MAS S

GMS . 0.5 8 9.2 8 2935.2 5 23.8 6 EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.07 8 1 . 23 S 3 9 1 .78 8 3 . 18 5 GMS/K M

0.04 9 0.77 0 243.44 6 1 .97 9 AUX . AUX . AUX .

FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 22. 3 9.5 0 10. 5
COMMENTS : O NBOAR D VE H 3 LA-4 S BAC K T O BAC K RE D TAURU S

3/1B G LA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 4 TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-19B 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-450 5

oREQUESTO R ID : 1233 6 NAME : C . FULLE R REPOR T TIME : 15:10:2 0

DATE : JU L 25 , 198 9 VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NREPOR T - (TESTN O GEN ) - DAT E O F ENTR Y : 10/14/8 8 TES T tt 89450 5

VEHICL E SPECIFICATION S
MANUFACTURE R VEHICL E I D A193XEX-091 5 / VE R 0 REPRESENTE D CARLIN E MODE L COD E SEDA N EQUIV . CUR B INERTI ATES T WEIGH T CLAS S WEIGH T DRIV E COD E FRON T DRIV E STR . LEF T SOURC E FOR D EP A DRIV E AX L W T VEHICL E —YEAR —FUL L EMPT Y TYP E ACTUA L VEHICL E MODE L MD L AC T TAN K TAN K E F 1FABP52V3JG25951 7 8 8 8 8 350 0 362 5 H.P . METHO D N O ENTR Y ET W

C D . VE H SID E

FA N O D

C D AC T A C D NH P H P 6. 6 RUNNIN G CH G

NUMBE R

ASSIGNE D D F O R DURABILIT Y VEHICL E I D ALTERNAT E MANUFACTURE R ODOMETE R CORRECTIO NTIR E 8 . RI M INITIA L FACTO R SIZE S TIR E SPECIFICATION S SW L BL T PS I T D MF R CONST R NM NM F T R R D P P205/75R1 4

DISPLACEMEN T O.O E BOR E

0. 0 E STROK E

0. 0 E # 1 RATE D H P ENGIN E

TYP E ENGIN E SPECIFICATION S

ENGIN E CONFIGURATIO N NO . CYL . NO . TOTA L

CARB S BBL S FUE L SYSTE M FUE L TURBO/SUPE R COMP . COAS T

MFR/MODE L IN J CHARGER,COOLIN G RATI O D NT M OTT O SPAR K YE S IGNITIO NTIMIN G # 2 DE G TOL . RP M RP M TOL . GEA R LEF T IDL E %C O RIGH T COM B TOL . RP M IDL E RP M TOL . GEA R FAMIL Y NON E ENGIN E SYSTE M 0. 0

COD E

DRIV E TRAI NAN D CONTRO L SYSTE M SPECIFICATION S AXL E N/ V

A/ C RATI O RATI O ODOMETE R INSTALLE D EXHAUS T TYP E CRANKCAS E —TRANSMISSIO N— SYSTE M CONFI G MODI F COD E SHIF T INDIC . EVAPORATIO N LIGH T SYSTE M 0. 0 0. 0 YE S A- 3 MAIN-TAN K AUX.-TAN K CAPACIT Y VOLUM E CAPACIT Y VOLUM E SHIF T SPEE D SHIF T SCH . I D CIT Y HW Y -N O ENTR Y

EVAPORATIV E EMISSIO N FAMIL Y COD E FUE L TYP E UNLEADE D (A T EPA-IN D HO )

SALE S CLAS S 18.6 G 7.4 G B FT A $ CONTRO L SYSTE M TYPE S N O SALE S CLAS S SPECIFIE D

VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NCOMMENT S * SE E COMMENT S

1853 7
T I h oP.2 2

/ 

# # 3 -LQ-q.

7-27 - 

# ?f //e^? ^ j&t^ctJ^ 

# ^Wn^mlgut I I

i iIP.2 3 

# 7-27-P9 7* / Q_y«*«-< L <TV . C)



# f^c^X . '^CL^^ <r7 > (> • 

# (<tic.DYN O .SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89450 5 198 8 LIGH T DUT Y VEHICL E ANALYSI S PROCESSED : 15:51:0 5 J U L 27 , 198 9

MFR
. COD E VEHICL E I.D
. 0 3 0 A193XEX-091 5 VERSIO N 0 EVA P

N MF R . REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC - REASO N FO R

ULATE S CONFIRMATIO N N / TES TTYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES TPROCEDUR E BA G B YBA G CUR B DR V

AXL E AXL E PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E 07-26-8 9 EMPT Y t>\ IGNITIO NTIMIN G / # 2 RP M GEA R %C O / IDL E SOA K COASTDOW NTIM E IDL E HIG H SPEE D RP M GEA R PERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D 0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO X CV S "H G POIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO R ALDEHYDE S RG E 29.0 9 46. 7 96. 2 D 18. 6 48.6 1 0.889 6 27 C / DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S /

DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R SYSTE M TES T DAT E H R SIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S 07-27-8 9 1 3 D20 9 362 5 4. 0 45.0 0 9668. 4 N/ A BA G 1 7.40 5 MILE S 11.91 7 K M 17265 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX - 7446. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E CONC . RANG E 27.8 1 1 4 21.2 7 1 5 0.83 2 2 3 178.7 8 1 8 CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 24.8 2 PP M 21.1 8 PP M 0.79 9 % 178.7 8 PP M GMS . 3.0 2 7.6 0 3083.6 9 43.8 9 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.40 7 1 .02 6 416.44 1 5.92 7 GMS/K M

0.25 3 0.63 8 258.76 4 3.68 3 AUX .

FIELD 1 15.71 5

AUX . AUX . FIELD 2 COD E MP G 20. 8 KP L

8.8 3 L/100K M

11. 3
BA G 2 7.42 2 MILE S 11.94 4 K M 17304 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E METE R .X ' CONC .

11.9 ^ 8.6 9 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 23 . 2 7

/<
- 0 . 79 6 135.7 3 BACKGROUN D

RANG E METE R 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 SAMPL E

y/ CONC . SECS . VMIX = 7396. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R 16.52 9

CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 5.8 2 PP M 23.1 8 PP M 0.76 5 % 135.7 3 PP M MAS S EMISSION S AUX . AUX . AUX . GMS . GMS/M I GMS/K M FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E 0.7 0 0.09 5 0.05 9 8.2 6 1.11 3 0.69 1 MP G KP L L/100K M 2932.7 7 395.16 7 245.54 6 22. 0 9.3 7 10. 7 33 . 1 0 4.46 0 2.77 1 BA G 3 7.49 2 MILE S 12.05 7 K M 17468 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7375. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E METE R S 4. 0 / 0.2 ^ - 1 . 7 0. 0 CONC .

2.9 1 0 . 1 0 0.03 5 0. 0 CORRECTE D

CONCENTRATION S 4. 8 6 PP M 26.1 3 PP M 0.76 8 % 9fi.1 3 PP M GMS . 0.5 8 9 . 2 8 2935.2 5 23.8 6 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.07 8 1 .23 9 391.78 8 3.18 5 GMS/K M

0.04 9 0.77 0 243.44 6 1 .97 9 AUX .

FIELD 1 16.51 1

AUX . AUX . FIELD 2 COD E MP G 2 2 . 3 KP L

9.5 0 L/100K M

10. 5 COMMENTS : O NBOAR D VE H 3 LA-4 S BAC K T O BAC K RE D TAURU S

3/1B G LA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 4 TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPCFMiri . ! PO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-450 5

r o•DYN

O SITE : D20 9 TES T # 89-450 5 TES T CONDITIONS : DAT E MM-DD-YYTIM E TEST : 07-27-8 9 KEY-START : PREP : 07-26-8 9 KEY-OFF : CALCULATE DSOA

KPERIO D= HR:M

N 13:4 0 14:3 0 23. 2 I.D . TITL E NAME REQUESTO R INSPECTO R AM A PRE P LA 4 PRE P DIURNAL DRIVE R SIT E OPER . DATA VAL . HOT-SOA

K C FULLER INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D I

I I I I I I I D D D D

. 0 D D D DEPT .

ECT D | 198 8 DAT A INPU T -QC/QA - ANDERROR S REPOR T |

TES T PACKE T STATUS : NO T VALIDATE D

NUMBE R 1233 6

5476 8 5472 1 PROCESSED : 15:51:0 5 JU L 27 , 198 9 DISPOSITIONS : VEHICL E DISP : CER T TES T DISP : F.E . TES T DISP :

ALTERNAT E HFI DSIT E NO . VOI DCODES : LAB : CERT : Q.C . : INSTRUMEN T USAGES : PRE P DYNO : TES T DYNO : PRE P DYNO SITE : PRETES T ADJUSTMENTS : WARNING , N O INPU T INDICATOR S FO RADJUSTMENT S 

# ,<»ciya QC/Q A CHECKS : OU T OF TOLERANC E CHECKS : 2 , 6 , 47 , INPUT DATA

CHECKS : N O DATA INPU T ERROR S FLAGGE DFO RTHI S TES T CALCULATION

ERRORS : N O CALCULATIO N

ERROR S FLAGGE DFO RTHI S TES T COMMENTS : O

N BOAR DVE H 3 LA-4 S BAC KT O BAC KRE DTAURU S 3/1BGLA-4 S A

T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 4

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T # 89-450 5.REQUESTOR ID : 547 2 1 NAME : \~ 

# 00 3 TES T tt 89453 3 REPOR T TIME : 10:56:5 6

DATE : JU L 27 , 198 9 VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NREPOR T (TESTN O GEN ) DAT E O F ENTR Y: 04/03/8 9 VEHICL E SPECIFICATION S MANUFACTURE R VEHICL E I D / VE R REPRESENTE D CARLIN E MODE L COD E 1FABP52UXJG1108 9 0 SEDA N DRIV E COD E SOURC E HERT Z DETROI T FOR D DRIV E AX L W T EQUIV . VEHICL E —YEAR — FUL L EMPT Y CUR B INERTI ATES T TYP E ACTUA L VEHICL E MODE L MD L AC T TANK TAN K WEIGH T CLAS S WEIGH T H.P . METHO D ETW C D . SID E O D AC T A C RUNNIN G CH G VE H FA

NC D D NH P H P NUMBE R NON-CE R TAURU S 8 8 8 8 3325 P 3500 P 3625 P N O ENTR Y 6. 6
ASSIGNE D D F OR DURABILIT Y VEHICL E I D ALTERNAT E MANUFACTURE R ODOMETE R TIR E SPECIFICATION S CORRECTIO NTIR E 8 . RI M SW L BL T PS I T D INITIA L FACTO R SIZE S MF R CONST R NM NM F T R R D P 20570-1 4 ENGIN E SPECIFICATION S DISPLACEMEN T O.O E BOR E

0. 0 E STROK E

0. 0 E RATE D ENGIN E

H P TYP E ENGIN E NO . NO . TOTA L P-JS.LSYSTE M FUE L TURBO/SUPE R COMP . COAS T CONFIGURATIO NCVL . CARB S BBL S MFR/MODE L IN J CHARGER,COO L ING RATI O D NTM OTT O SPAR K FOR D NON E 0. 0 IGNITIO NTIMIN G # 1 # 2 DE G TOL . RP M RP M TOL . GEAR IDL E % C O LEF T RIGH T COM B TOL . IDL E RP M RP M TOL . GEA R ENGIN E

FAMIL Y SYSTE M JFM3.0V5FEG X 1 COD E

DRIV E TRAI NAN D CONTRO L SYSTE M SPECIFICATION S AXL E N/ V

A/ C RATI O RATI O ODOMETE R INSTALLE D EXHAUS T TYP E CRANKCAS E —TRANSMISSIO N—SHIF T INDI C EVAPORATIO N SYSTE M CONFI G MODI F COD E LIGH T SYSTE M 0. 0 0. 0 YE S -N O ENTR Y CANISTE R FUE L TYP E INDOLEN E 3 0 MAIN-TAN K AUX.-TAN K CAPACIT Y VOLUM E CAPACIT Y VOLUM E SHIF T SPEE D SHIF T SCH . I D CIT Y HW Y EVAPORATIV E EMISSIO N

FAMIL Y COD E SALE S CLAS S 16.0 G 6.4 G D O NO T SHIF T MANUALL Y $ $ CONTRO L SYSTE M TYPE S 3.0L-8H M NO SALE S CLAS S SPECIFIE D

AD D # 3 T O VI NRE D TAURU S VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NCOMMENT S * SE E COMMENT S

1911 8.REOUESTO R ID : 5472 1 TES T It 89453 3 NAME : REPOR T TIME : 10:56:5 6

DATE : JU L 27 , 198 9 VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NREPOR T - (TESTN O GEN ) - DAT E O F ENTR Y : 04/03/8 9 VEHICL E SPECIFICATION S
MANUFACTURE R VEHICL E I D / VE R REPRESENTE D CARLIN E MODE L COD E DRIV E COD E SOURC E FOR D 1FABP52UXJG1108 9 0 SEDA NHERT Z DETROI T DRIV E AX L W T EQUIV . ET W VEHICL E --YEAR- - FUL L EMPT Y CUR B INERTI ATES T CD . SID E O D AC T A C RUNNIN G CH G TYP E ACTUA L VEHICL E MODE L MD L AC T TAN K TAN K WEIGH T CLAS S WEIGH T H.P . METHO D VE H FA NC D D NH P H P NUMBE R NON-CE R TAURU S 8 8 8 8 P P 3325 P 3500 P 3625 P N O ENTR Y 4 6. 6 ODOMETE R TIR E SPECIFICATION S CORRECTIO NTIR E 8 , RI M SW L BL T PS I T D ASSIGNE D D F O R DURABILIT Y VEHICL E I D ALTERNAT E MANUFACTURE R INITIA L FACTO R SIZE S MF R CONST R NM NM F T R R D P 20570
- 1 4 ENGIN E SPECIFICATION S RATE D ENGIN E ENGIN E NO . NO . TOTA L F'.'FL . SYSTE M FUE L TURBO/SUPE R COM P . COAS T DISPLACEMEN T BOR E STROK E H P TYP E CONFIGURATIO NCYL . CARB S BBL S WFR/MODE L IN J CHARGER,COOLIN G RATI O D NT M O.O E 0. 0 E 0. 0 E OTT O SPAR K FOR D NON E 0. 0

IGNITIO NTIMIN G IDL E % C O IDL E ENGIN E # 1 # 2 DE G TOL . RP M RP M TOL . GEA R LEF T RIGH T COM B TOL . RP M RP M TOL . GEA R FAMIL Y SYSTE M COD E JFM3.0V5FEG X 1
DRIV E TRAI NAN D CONTRO L SYSTE M SPECIFICATION S AXL E N/ V

A/ C CRANKCAS E —TRANSMISSIO N—SHIF T INDIC . EVAPORATIO N RATI O RATI O ODOMETE R INSTALLE D EXHAUS T TYP E SYSTE M CONFI G MODI F COD E LIGH T SYSTE M FUE L TYP E 0. 0 0. 0 YE S -N O ENTR Y CANISTE R INDOLEN E 3 0 MAIN-TAN K AUX.-TAN K SHIF T SCH . I D EVAPORATIV E EMISSIO N CAPACIT Y VOLUM E CAPACIT Y VOLUM E SHIF T SPEE D CIT Y HW Y FAMIL Y COD E SALE S CLAS S 16.O G 6.4 G D O NO T SHIF T MANUALL Y 3.0L-8H M N O SALE S CLAS S SPECIFIE D $ $ CONTRO L SYSTE M TYPE S

VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NCOMMENT S * SE E COMMENT S AD D # 3 T O VI NRE D TAURU S

1911 8DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89453 3 198 8 LIGH T DUT Y VEHICL E ANALYSI S | PROCESSED : 14:58:0 0 JU L 28 , 198 9

MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . VERSIO N 03 0 1FABP52UXJG1108 9 0 EVA P N MFR .

REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC
- REASO NFO R

ULATE S CONFIRMATIO N N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTO ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA G B Y BA G CUR B DR V

AXL E AXL E PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E 07-27-8 9 EMPT Y # 1 IGNITIO NTIMIN G / # 2 RP M GEA R IDL E - % C O HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA K COASTDOW NTIM E RP M GEA R PERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO X CV S "H G POIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO R ALDEHYDE S RG E 29.1 8 51. 6 96. 6 D 22. 0 58.3 2 0.927 3 27 C / DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S /

DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R SYSTE M TES T DAT E H R SIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S 07-28-8 9 1 1 D20 9 3625 0 4. 0 45.0 0 30508. 8 N/ A BA G 1 7.43 7 MILE S 11.96 9 K M 17340 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7467. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R SIT E 0A2O 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R 34. 8 4 0 . O 36. 9 7 . 3" ^ 1 BACKGROUN D SAMPL E

CONC . RANG E METE R 25.7 1 1 4 5. 3 19.8 3 1 5 0. 2 0.81 8 2 3 1. 8 56.5 3 1 8 0. 0 CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 22.1 0 PP M 19.7 3 PP M 0.78 3 % 156.5 3 PP M GMS . 2.6 9 7.4 0 3029.2 3 38.5 4 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.36 2 0.99 5 4 0 7.31 6 5 . 18 2 GMS/K M

0.22 5 0.61 8 253.09 5 3 . 22 0 AUX .

FIELD 1 16.03 0

AUX . AUX . FIELD 2 COD E MP G 21. 3 KP L

9.0 5 L/100K M

11. 0
BA G 2 7.46 4 MILE S 12.01 2 K M 17402 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7422. 0 CU.FT . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E METE R 4 . 7 ' 0. 1 "V l.fl y0.03 7 0.0 ' 0. 0 DILUTIO NFACTO R CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 7.1 7 PP M 15.9 0 PP M 0.74 0 % 161.5 8 PP M GMS . 0.8 7 5.9 3 2845.7 6 39.5 4 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.11 6 0 . 79 4 38 1 .28 4 5 . 29 8 GMS/K M

0.07 2 0.49 3 236.91 9 3 . 29 2 AUX .

FIELD 1 16.91 8

AUX . AUX . FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22 . 7 9.6 7 L/100K M '0. 3
BA G 3 7.48 5 MILE S 12.04 5 K M 17451 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7406. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.99 2 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O 1 4

1 5 2 3 1 8 EXHAUS TSAMPL E RANG E METE R //CON C

16.8 " 12.3 0 32. 2 *X, 15.9 4 34. 8 / /

0.76 8 45. 8 ^ 196.3 4 BACKGROUN D

RANG E METE R 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 9.1 5 PP M 15.8 0 PP M 0.73 3 % 196.3 4 PP M MAS S EMISSION S AUX . AUX . AUX . GMS . GMS/M I GMS/K M FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E 1.1 1 0.14 8 0.09 2 5.8 8 0.78 5 0.48 8 MP G KP L L/100K M 2812.3 1 375.74 4 233.47 6 23. 0 9.7 6 10. 2 47.9 4 6.40 5 3.98 0 COMMENTS : AD D tt3 T O VI NTAURU S RE D 3-LA-4 S BAC K T O BAC K STOC K VE H A T 9 5 DEGREE S F tt] TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGl ' -A T IONS .

1 9 11 8 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-453 3•DYN O SITE : D20 9 TES T tt 89-453 3
TES T CONDITIONS : DAT E MM-DD-Y V

TIM E TEST : 07-28-8 9 KEY-START : PREP : 07-27-8 9 KEY-OFF : CALCULATE D SOA K PERIO D = HR:M N 11:2 1 15:2 0 20. 0 I.D . TITL E NAM E DEPT . REQUESTO R INSPECTO R AM APRE P LA 4 PRE P DIURNA L DRIVE R SIT E OPER . DAT AVAL . HOT-SOA K INVALI D I.D .

INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . | 198 8 DAT AINPU T -QC/QA
- AN D ERROR S REPOR T |

TES T PACKE T STATUS : NO T VALIDATE D

NUMBE R 5472 1

5476 8 5472 1 PROCESSED : 14:58:0 0 JU L 28 , 198 9 DISPOSITIONS : VEHICL E DISP : CER T TES T DISP : F.E . TES T DISP :

ALTERNAT E HFI D SIT E NO . VOI D CODES : LAB : CERT : Q . C : INSTRUMEN T USAGES : PRE P DYNO : TES T DYNO :
PRE P DYN O SITE : PRETES T ADJUSTMENTS : WARNING , N O INPU T INDICATOR S FO R ADJUSTMENT S



# , 

# ./.ot 

# ft" QC/Q ACHECKS : OU T O F TOLERANC E CHECKS : 2 . 6 , INPU T DAT ACHECKS : N O DAT AINPU T ERROR S FLAGGE D FO R THI S TES T CALCULATIO NERRORS : N O CALCULATIO NERROR S FLAGGE D FO R THI S TES T COMMENTS : AD D # 3 T O VI NTAURU S RE D

3-LA-4 S BAC K T O BAC K STOC K VE H A T 9 5 DEGREE S F tt 1

1911 8 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89-453 3

r o c oDYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89453 3 198 8 LIGH T DUT Y VEHICL E ANALYSI S | PROCESSED : 14:58:0 6 JU L 28 , 198 9

MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . VERSIO NEVA P 03 0 1FABP52UXJG1108 9 0 N MFR . REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC
ULATE S N REASO NFO R

CONFIRMATIO N / TES TTYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES TPROCEDUR E BA G B YBA G CUR B DR V

AXL E AXL E / IGNITIO NTIMIN G / / % C O / PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E # 1 # 2 RP M GEA R IDL E HIG H SPEE D 07-27-8 9 EMPT Y IDL E SOA K COASTDOW NTIM E RP M GEA R PERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO X CV S "H G POIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO R ALDEHYDE S RG E 29.1 8 51. 6 96. 6 D 22. 0 58.3 2 0.927 3 27 C / DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S /

DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R SYSTE M TES T DAT E H R SIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S 07-28-8 9 1 1 D20 9 3625 0 4. 0 45.0 0 30508. 8 N/ A BA G 1 7.43 7 MILE S 11.96 9 K M 17340 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E

RANG E METE R CONC . RANG E METE R 1 4 34. 8 25.7 1 14 5. 3 1 5 40. 0 19.8 3 1 5 0. 2 2 3 36. 9 0.81 8 2 3 1. 8 1 8 37. 3 156.5 3 1 8 0. 0 SECS . VMIX = 7467. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.03 0 CORRECTE D CONC . CONCENTRATION S 3.8 5 22.1 0 PP M 0.1 0 19.7 3 PP M 0.03 7 0.78 3 % 0. 0 156.5 3 PP M GMS . 2.6 9 7.4 0 3029.2 3 38.5 4 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.36 2 :-.99 5 40 7 .31 6 5 '8 2 GMS/K M

0.22 5 0.61 8 253.09 5 3.22 0 AUX .

FIELD 1 AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 21. 3 KP L

9.0 5 L/100K M

1 1 . 0
BA G 2 7.46 4 MILE S 12.01 2 K M 17402 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7422. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.91 8 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

14. 2 32. 2 35 . 1 38. 4 BACKGROUN D SAMPL E

CONC . 10.3 8 15.9 4 0.77 5 161.5 8 RANG E

14 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 7 0 . 1 1 . 8 0. 0 CONC .

3.4 2 0.0 5 0.03 7 0. 0 CORRECTE D

CONCENTRATION S 7.1 7 PP M 15.9 0 PP M 0.74 0 % 161.5 8 PP M GMS . 0.8 7 5.9 3 2845.7 6 39.5 4 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.11 6 0.79 4 3ei.28 4 5.29 8 GMS/K M

0.07 2 0.49 3 236.91 9 3.29 2 AUX .

FIELD 1 AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22. 7 KP L

9.6 7 L/1OOK M

10. 3
BA G 3 7.48 5 MILE S 12.04 5 K M 17451 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7406. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

16. 8 32. 2 34. 8 45. 8 CONC .

12.3 0 15.9 4 0.76 8 196.3 4 BACKGROUN D SAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 6 0. 3 1 . 8 0. 0 CONC .

3.3 4 0 . 1 5 0.03 7 0. 0 CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 9.1 5 PP M 15.8 0 PP M 0.73 3 % 196.3 4 PP M GMS . 1.1 1 5.8 8 2812.3 1 47.9 4 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0
. 14 8 0 . 78 5 375.74 4 6.40 5 GMS/K M

0.09 2 0.48 8 233.47 6 3.98 0 AUX .

FIELD 1 16.99 2

AUX . AUX . FIELD 2 COD E MP G 23. 0 KP L

9.7 6 L/100K M

10. 2 COMMENTS : AD D # 3 T O VI NTAURU S RE D

3-LA-4 S BAC K T O BAC K STOC K VE H A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 1 TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1911 8 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T89-453 3

T I c o.DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES Ttt 89453 3 198 8 LIGH TDUT YVEHICL E ANALYSI S | PROCESSED : 14:58:0 6 JU L 28 , 198 9

MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . VERSIO N EVA P 0 3 0 1FABP52UXJG1108 9 0 N MFR . REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC -

ULATE S N REASO N FO R

CONFIRMATIO N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTAL (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA GB YBA G CUR B DR

V AXL E AXL E PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E 07-27-8 9 EMPT Y # 1 IGNITION TIMIN G/ # 2 RP M

GEA

R IDL E - %

CO HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA KCOASTDOW

N TIM E RP M GEA RPERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BARO DE

W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NOXCV S "H GPOINT TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO

RALDEHYDE S RG E 2 9 . 1 8 / 51. 6 96. 6 D 22. 0 58.3 2 0.927 3

DYNAMOMETE R TES TCONDITION S / 27 C TES T DAT E H R 07-28-8 9 1 1 BA G 1 7.43 7 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O BA G 2 7.46 4 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O BA G 3 7.48 5 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R

SIT E I W SE T TWH P D20 9 3625 0 4. 0 4 5 MILE S 11.96 9 K M 17340 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E METE R CONC . 1 4 34. 8 25.7 1 1 5 40. 0 19.8 3 2 3 36. 9 0.81 8 1 8 37. 3 156.5 3 MILE S 12.01 2 K M 17402 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E METE R CONC . 1 4 14. 2 10.3 8 1 5 32. 2 15.9 4 2 3 35. 1 0.77 5 1 8 38. 4 161.5 8 MILE S 12.04 5 K M 17451 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E METE R CONC . 14 16. 8 12.3 0 1 5 32. 2 15.9 4 2 3 34. 8 0.76 8 1 8 45. 8 196.3 4 COMMENTS : AD D # 3 T O VI NTAURU S RE D 3 S I (MI ) .0 0 30508. 8 ROL L REVS . BACKGROUN D RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 ROL L METE R

5. 3 0. 2 1 . 8 0. 0 REVS . BACKGROUN D RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 ROL L METE R

4. 7 0 . 1 1 . 8 0. 0 REVS . BACKGROUN D RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 6 0. 3 1 . 8 0. 0 SYSTE M MILE S N/ A
SAMPL E CONC . 3.8 5 0 . 1 0 0.03 7 0. 0
SAMPL E CONC . 3.4 2 0.0 5 0.03 7 0. 0 SAMPL E CONC . 3.3 4 0 . 1 5 0.03 7 0. 0 SECS .

CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 22.1 0 PP M 19.7 3 PP M 0.78 3 % 156.5 3 PP M

SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 7.1 7 PP M 15.9 0 PP M 0.74 0 % 161.5 8 PP M SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 9.1 5 PP M 15.8 0 PP M 0.73 3 % 196.3 4 PP M VMIX = 746 7 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 2.6 9 7.4 0 3029.2 3 38.5 4 VMIX = 742 2 GMS/M I

0.36 2 0.99 5 40 7 .31 6 5 . 18 2 0 CU.FT . GMS/K M

0.22 5 0.61 8 253.09 5 3.22 0 DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 0.8 7 5.9 3 2845.7 6 39.5 4 VMIX = 740 6 GMS/M I

0.11 6 0.79 4 3ei.28 4 5.29 8 0 CU.FT . GMS/K M

0.07 2 0.49 3 236.91 9 3.29 2 DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 1.1 1 5.8 8 2812.3 1 4 7 .9 4 GMS/M I

0 . 14 8 0.78 5 375.74 4 6.40 5 GMS/K M

0.09 2 0.4B S 233.47 6 3.98 0 FACTO R = 16.03 0

AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 21. 3 9.0 5 11. 0
FACTO R = 16.91 8 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 22. 7 9.6 7 10. 3
FACTO R = 16.99 2 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 23. 0 9.7 6 10. 2

TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

19 1 1 8 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T89-453 3 T I c oD v N O SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89453 3 198 8 LIGH T DUT Y VEHICL E ANALYSI S PROCESSED : 14:58:0 7 JU L 28 , 198 9

MF R . COD E 03 0 VEHICL E I.D . 1FABP52UXJG1108 9 VERSIO N 0 EVA P

N MFR .

REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y AL T . H . P . MET H PARTIC
ULATE S N REASO NFO R

CONFIRMATIO N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA G B Y BA G CUR B DR V

AXL E AXL E / IGNITIO NTIMIN G / / % C O PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E # 1 # 2 RP M GEA R IDL E HIG H SPEE D 07-27-8 9 EMPT Y IDL E SOA K COASTDOW NTIM E RP M GEA R PERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO X CV S "H G POIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO R ALDEHYDE S RG E 29.1 8 51. 6 96. 6 D 22. 0 58.3 2 0.927 3 27 C / DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S /

DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R SYSTE M TES T DAT E H R SIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S U7-28-8 9 1 1 D20 9 3625 0 4. 0 45.0 0 30508. 8 N/ A BA G 7.43 7 MILE S 11.96 9 K M 17340 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7467. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.03 0 1IT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R 3 4 . 8 40. 0 36. 9 3 7 . 3 CON C

25.7 1 19.8 3 0.81 8 156.5 3 RANG E

1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

5 . 3 0 . 2 1 . H 0 . 0 CORRECTE D

BA G 2 7.46 4 MILE S 12.01 2 K M 17402 . ROL L REVS . SEC S . SIT E HA203 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

14. 2 3 2 . 2 3 5 . 1 38 . 4 CONC .

10.3 8 15.9 4 0 . 77 5 161.5 8 BACKGROUN D SAMPL E CORRECTE D MAS S EMISSION S AUX . AUX . AUX . CONC . CONCENTRATION S 3.8 5 22.1 0 PP M 0.1 0 19.7 3 PP M 0.03 7 0.78 3 % 0. 0 156.5 3 PP M

RANG E METE R CONC . CONCENTRATION S 1 4 4. 7 3.4 2 7.1 7 PP M 1 5 0. 1 0.0 5 15.9 0 PP M 2 3 1. 8 0.03 7 0.74 0 % 1 8 0. 0 0. 0 161.5 8 PP M GMS . 2 . 6 9 7 .4 0 3029.2 3 38.5 4 MIX = 742 2 GMS/M I

0.36 2 0.99 5 407. 3 1 6 5 i H 2 0 CU.FT . GMS/K M

0 . 22 5 0.61 8 25 3 .09 5 3 . 22 0 DlLUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 0.8 7 5.9 3 2845.7 6 3 9 . 5 4 GMS/M I

3.11 6 0 . 79 4 38 ' .28 4 5 . 2y a GMS/K M

0.07 2 0.49 3 236.91 9 3 . 29 2 FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E

MP G KP L L/100K M 21. 3 9.0 5 11. 0
FACTO R = 16.91 8 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 22. 7 9.6 7 10. 3
BA G 3 7.48 5 MILE S 12.04 5 K M 17451 . ROL L REVS . ,IT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 7 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E METE R 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 16 . 32 . 34 . 45 . CONC .

12.3 0 1 5 .94 0.76 8 196.3 4 BACKGROUN D SAMPL E SECS . VMIX = 7406. 0 CU.FT . CORRECTE D DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.99 2 RANG E METE R CONC . CONCENTRATION S 1 4 4. 6 3.3 4 9.1 5 PP M 1 5 0. 3 0.1 5 15.8 0 PP M 2 3 1. 8 0.03 7 0.73 3 % 1 B 0. 0 0. 0 196.3 4 PP M MAS S EMISSION S AUX . AUX . AUX . GMS . 1.1 1 5.8 8 2812.3 1 4 7 .9 4 GMS/M I

0 . 14 8 0 . 78 5 375.74 4 6 . 40 5 GMS/K M

0.09 2 0.48 8 233.47 6 3.98 0 FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E

MP G KP L L/100K M 23. 0 9.7 6 10. 2
COMMENTS : AD D #3 T O VI NTAURU S RE D 3-LA-4 S BAC K T O BAC K STOC K VE H A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 1 TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1 9 11 8 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-453 3

# poo- /

,DYN 0 SITE:D20 9 TES T# 89450 6 198 8 LIGH TDUT YVEHICL E ANALYSI S PROCESSED : 09:27:4 0 AU G 3 , 198 9
MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . 03 0 A193XEX-091 5 VERSIO N 0 EVA P

N MFR .

REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC
ULATE S N REASO NFOR

CONFIRMATIO N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA G B Y BA G CUR B DRV

AXL E AXL E / IGNITIO NTIMIN G / / % C O PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E tt\ # 2 RP M GEA R IDL E HIG H SPEE D 08-01-8 9 EMPT Y IDL E SOA K COASTDOW NTIM E RP M GEAR PERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0
BAR O Q£ W / "H G ,POI{* T 29.24 ^ 43. 6 AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M TEMe/UNI T HU M GR/L B 95. 6 D 16. 8 42.9 3 NO X CV S FACTO R ALDEHYDE S RG E 0.869 0 27 C / DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S / TES T DAT E H R 08-02-8.9-1 0 BA G 1 7.44 3 SIT E #A203 y V .' ' HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O BA G 2 7.47 1 SIT E «*A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O BA G 3 7.44 7 SIT E #A20 3



### ...

/ HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R SYSTE M

SIT E I W SE T TWH P D20 9 362 5 4. 0 4 5 /MILE S 11.97 9 K M 17355 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E METE R , CON C 14- ^ 49.3/ / 36.6 2 15 / 42.9 / 21.2 7 2 3 '- ' 37.3*V>- ' 0.82 7 1 8 - 43.3 / 184.4 3 MILE S 12.02 4 K M 17420 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E METE R CONC . 14" " 12.4. y

9.0 6 15/ " 47. 3 ' 23.4 7 23 . 36. 0 y0.79 6 1 8 .- " 30 . 0 / 123.7 6 MILE S 11.98 5 K M 17364 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E METE R / CONC . 1 4 V 11. 5 y8.4 0 1 5 " V 50. 2 • / 24.9 2 2 3 / 36.3* / 0.80 3 1 8 ' 25.2« / 102.8 5 PS I (MI ) MILE S .0 0 9690. 4 N/ A ROL L REVS . BACKGROUN D SAMPL E RANG E METE R ^ CONC . 1 4 ^ 4 . 8 "y . 3.4 9 1 5 / 0. 4 r

0.2 0 2 3 t-X 1. 8 / / 0.03 7 1 8 " " 0. 0 _^/0. 0 ROL L REVS . BACKGROUN D SAMPL E RANG E METE R CONC . 1 4 -" " 4.4
- 3 . 2 0 15./ ' 0.2. / 0.1 0 23
- 1.8c / 0.03 7 1 8 ^ 0. 0 ^ ^

0. 0 ROL L REVS . BACKGROUN D SAMPL E RANG E METE R CONC . 14 ~ 4.3'" . 3.1 3 15- / 0.3/ ' 0.1 5 23^ " 1.8 / 0.03 7 IB/" " 0.0 / 0. 0 SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 33.3 5 PP M 21.0 9 PP M 0.79 3 % 1.84.4 3 PP M SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 6.0 5 PP M 23.3 8 PP M 0.76 1 % 123.7 6 PP M SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 5.4 6 PP M 24.7 8 PP M 0.76 9 % 102.8 5 PP M VMIX = 748 9 0 CU.JFT . DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 4i0 8 7.4 3 3075.4 0 45.5 4 VMIX = 741 7 GMS/M I

0.54 8 0.99 9 413.16 7 6.11 8 0 CU.FT . GMS/K M

0.34 1 0.62 0 256.73 0 3 .80 2 DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 0.7 3 8.1 6 2926.2 0 30.2 6 VMIX = 739 9 GMS/M I

0.09 8 1 .09 2 391.65 6 .4.05 1 0 CU.FT . GMS/K M

0.06 1 0.67 9 243.36 4 2.51 7 DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 0.6 6 8.6 3 2946.5 4 25.0 9 GMS/M I

0.08 9 1 . 15 9 395.65 0 3 . 36 9 GMS/K M

0.05 5 0 . 72 0 245.84 6 2.09 3 FACTO R = 15.77 6

AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 20. 9 8.8 8 11. 3
FAC T 0 R = 16.55 3 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD l FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 22. 3 9.4 7 10. 6
FACTO R = 16.45 2 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD l FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 22 . 1 9.4 0 10. 6 COMMENTS : ONBOAR D VE H 3 LA-4 S BAC K T O BAC K TAURU S RE D

3/1B G LA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 5 TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T89-450 6

c o c oDYN O SITE : D20 9 TES T tt 89-450 6 I 19B 8 DAT AINPU T -QC/QA
- AN D ERROR S REPOR T | PROCESSED : 09:27:4 0 AU G 198 9 TES T CONDITIONS : DAT E MM-DD-Y Y TIM E TEST : 08-02-8 9 KEY-START : PREP : 08-01-8 9 KEY-OFF : CALCULATE D SOA K PERIO D = HR:M N 10:3 0 13:4 0 20. 8 TES T PACKE T STATUS : NO T VALIDATE D DISPOSITIONS : VEHICL E DISP : CER T TES T DISP : F.E . TES T DISP :
I.D . TITL E NAM E DEPT . NUMBE R REQUESTO R INSPECTO R AM APRE P LA 4 PRE P DIURNA L DRIVE R SIT E OPER . DAT AVAL . HOT-SOA K C . FULLE R

INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . ECT D 1233 6

5476 8 5472 1

ALTERNAT E HFI D SIT E NO . VOI D CODES : LAB : CERT : Q . C : INSTRUMEN T USAGES : PRE P DYNO : TES T DYNO :
PRE P DYN O SITE : PRETES T ADJUSTMENTS : WARNING , N O INPU T INDICATOR S FO R ADJUSTMENT S QC/Q A CHECKS : \ y

J • '• . / V r •

• i -y OU T O F TOLERANC E CHECKS : 2 , 6 , 47 , 48, . j ' - INPU T DAT ACHECKS : N O DAT AINPU T ERROR S FLAGGE D FO R THI S TES T CALCULATIO NERRORS : N O CALCULATIO NERROR S FLAGGE D FO R THI S TES T COMMENTS : O NBOAR D VE H 3 LA-4 S BAC K T O BAC K TAURU S RE D

3/1B G LA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 5

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T It 89-450 6,DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T # 89450 6 19B 8 LIGH T DUT Y VEHICL E ANALYSI S PROCESSED : 09:27:4 0 AU G 198 9

MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . VERSIO NEVA P 03 0 A193XEX-091 5 0 N MFR . REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC
ULATE S N REASO NFO R

CONFIRMATIO N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA G B Y BA G CUR B DR V

AXL E AXL E / PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E # 1 08-01-8 9 EMPT Y IGNITIO NTIMIN G / #2 RP M GEA R IDL E - % C O HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA K COASTDOW NTIM E RP M GEA R PERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO X CV S "H G POIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO R ALDEHYDE S RG E 29.2 4 43. 6 95. 6 D 16. 8 42.9 3 0.869 0 27 C / DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S /

DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R SYSTE M TES T DAT E H R SIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S 08-02-8 9 1 0 D20 9 362 5 4. 0 45.0 0 9690. 4 N/ A BA G 1 7.44 3 MILE S 11.97 9 K M 17355 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E SECS . VMIX = 7489. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R = 15.77 6

RANG E METE R CONC . RANG E METE R CONC . 14 49. 3 36.6 2 14 4. 8 3.4 9 1 5 42. 9 21.2 7 1 5 0. 4 0.2 0 2 3 37. 3 0.82 7 2 3 1. 8 0.03 7 1 8 43. 3 184.4 3 1 8 0. 0 0. 0 CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 33.3 5 PP M 21.0 9 PP M 0.79 3 % 184.4 3 PP M GMS . 4.0 8 7.4 3 3075.4 0 45.5 4 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.54 8 0.99 9 413.16 7 6.11 8 GMS/K M

0.34 1 0.62 0 256.73 0 3.80 2 AUX .

FIELD l AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 20. 9 KP L

8.8 8 L/100K M

11. 3
BA G 2 7.47 1 MILE S 12.02 4 K M 17420 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E

RANG E METE R CONC . RANG E METE R 1 4 12. 4 9.0 6 1 4 4. 4 1 5 47. 3 23.4 7 1 5 0. 2 2 3 36. 0 0.79 6 2 3 1. 8 1 8 30. 0 123.7 6 1 8 0. 0 SECS . VMIX = 7417. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R CORRECTE D CONC . CONCENTRATION S GMS . 3.2 0 6.0 5 PP M 0.7 3 0.1 0 23.3 8 PP M 8.1 6 0.03 7 0.76 1 %2926.2 0 0. 0 123.7 6 PP M 30.2 6 MAS S EMISSION S GMS/M I 0.09 8 1 .09 2 391.65 6 4.05 1 GMS/K M

0.06 1 0.67 9 243.36 4 2.51 7 AUX .

FIELD l 16.55 3

AUX . AUX . FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22. 3 KP L

9.4 7 L/100K M

10. 6
BA G 3 7.44 7 MILE S 11.98 5 K M 17364 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E SECS . VMIX = 7399. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.45 2

RANG E METE R CONC . RANG E METE R CONC . 14 11. 5 8.4 0 1 4 4. 3 3.1 3 1 5 50. 2 24.9 2 1 5 0. 3 0.1 5 2 3 36. 3 0.80 3 2 3 1. 8 0.03 7 1 8 25. 2 102.8 5 1 8 0. 0 0. 0 CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 5.4 6 PP M 24.7 8 PP M 0.76 9 % 102.8 5 PP M GMS . 0.6 6 8.6 3 2946.5 4 25.0 9 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.08 9 1 . 15 9 395.65 0 3.36 9 GMS/K M

0.05 5 0.72 0 245.84 6 2.09 3 AUX .

FIELD l AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22 . 1 KP L

9.4 0 L/100K M

10. 6 COMMENTS : O NBOAR D VE H 3 LA-4 S BAC K T O BAC K TAURU S RE D

3/1B G LA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 5 TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-450 6DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T # 89450 6 198 8 LIGH T DUT Y VEHICL E ANALYSI S | PROCESSED : 09:27:4 4 AU G 198 9

MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . VERSIO NEVA P 03 0 A193XEX-091 5 0 N MFR . REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC
ULATE S N REASO NFO R

CONFIRMATIO N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA G B Y BA G CUR B DR V

AXL E AXL E PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E 08-01-8 9 EMPT Y tt\ IGNITIO NTIMIN G / # 2 RP M GEA R IDL E - % C O HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA K COASTDOW NTIM E RP M GEA R PERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO X CV S "H G POIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO R ALDEHYDE S RG E 29.2 4 43. 6 95. 6 D 16. 8 42.9 3 0.869 0 27 C / DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S — / DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R SYSTE M TES T DAT E H R SIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S 08-02-8 9 1 0 D20 9 362 5 4. 0 45.0 0 9690. 4 N/ A BA G 1 7.44 3 MILE S 11.97 9 K M 17355 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7489. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R 49. 3 42. 9 37. 3 43. 3 CONC .

36.6 2 2 1 .2 7 0.82 7 184.4 3 BACKGROUN D SAMPL E

RANG E 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 8 0. 4 1 . 8 0. 0 CONC .

3.4 9 0.2 0 0.03 7 0. 0 CORRECTE D

CONCENTRATION S 33.3 5 PP M 21.0 9 PP M 0.79 3 % 184.4 3 PP M GMS . 4.0 8 7.4 3 3075.4 0 45.5 4 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.54 8 0.99 9 413.16 7 6.11 8 GMS/K M

0.34 1 0.62 0 256.73 0 3.80 2 AUX .

FIELD l 15.77 6

AUX . AUX . FIELD 2 COD E MP G 20. 9 KP L

8.8 8 L / 100K M

11. 3
BA G 2 7.47 1 MILE S 12.02 4 K M 17420 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E

RANG E METE R CONC . RANG E METE R 1 4 12. 4 9.0 6 1 4 4. 4 1 5 47. 3 23.4 7 1 5 0. 2 2 3 36. 0 0.79 6 2 3 1. 8 1 8 30. 0 123.7 6 1 8 0. 0 SECS . VMIX = 7417. 0 CU.FT . CORRECTE D DILUTIO NFACTO R CONC . CONCENTRATION S GMS . 3.2 0 6.0 5 PP M 0.7 3 0.1 0 23.3 8 PP M 8.1 6 0.03 7 0.76 1 % 2926.2 0 0. 0 123.7 6 PP M 30.2 6 MAS S EMISSION S GMS/M I 0.09 8 1 .09 2 3 9 1.65 6 4.05 1 GMS/K M

0.06 1 0.67 9 243.36 4 2.51 7 AUX .

FIELD 1 16.55 3

AUX . AUX . FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22 . 3 KP L

9.4 7 L/100K M

10. 6
BA G 3 7.44 7 MILE S 11.98 5 K M 17364 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E

RANG E METE R CONC . RANG E METE R CONC . 14 11. 5 8.4 0 1 4 4. 3 3.1 3 1 5 50. 2 24.9 2 1 5 0. 3 0.1 5 2 3 36. 3 0.80 3 2 3 1. 8 0.03 7 1 8 25. 2 102.8 5 1 8 0. 0 0. 0 SECS . VMIX = 7399. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 5.4 6 PP M 24.7 8 PP M 0.76 9 % 102.8 5 PP M GMS . 0.6 6 8.6 3 2946.5 4 25.0 9 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.08 9 1 . 15 9 395.65 0 3.36 9 GMS/K M

0.05 5 0.72 0 245.84 6 2.09 3 AUX .

FIELD l 16.45 2

AUX . AUX . FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22 . 1 KP L

9.4 0 L/100K M

10. 6 COMMENTS : O NBOAR D VE H 3 LA-4 S BAC K T O BAC K TAURU S RE D

3/1B G LA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 5 TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-450 6

C O O )DYN O SITE : D20 9 TES T * 89-450 6 I 198 8 DAT A INPU T -QC/QA - AN DERROR S REPOR T |

TES T CONDITIONS : DAT E MM-DD-Y YTIM E TEST : 08-02-8 9 KEY-START : PREP : 08-01-8 9 KEY-OFF : CALCULATE DSOA KPERIO D= HR:M N 10:3 0 13:4 0 20. 8 TES T PACKE T STATUS : NO T VALIDATE D

I.D . TITL E NAM E REQUESTO R INSPECTO R AM A PRE P LA 4 PRE P DIURNA L DRIVE R SIT E OPER . DAT A VAL . HOT-SOA K C FULLE R

INVALI DI.D . INVALI DI.D . INVALI DI.D . INVALI DI.D . INVALI DI.D . INVALI DI.D . INVALI DI.D . INVALI DI.D . DEPT . NUMBE R ECT D 1233 6

5476 8 5472 1 PROCESSED : 09:27:4 4 AU G 198 9 DISPOSITIONS : VEHICL E DISP : CER T TES T DISP : F.E . TES T DISP :

ALTERNAT E HFI DSIT E NO . VOI DCODES : LAB : CERT : Q.C . : INSTRUMEN T USAGES : PRE P DYNO : TES T DYNO : PRE P DYN O SITE :
PRETES T ADJUSTMENTS : WARNING , N O INPU T INDICATOR S FO RADJUSTMENT S

6 , 47 , 48 , QC/Q A CHECKS : OU T O F TOLERANC E CHECKS : 2 , INPU T DAT A

CHECKS : N O DAT A

INPU T ERROR S FLAGGE DFO RTHI S TES T CALCULATIO N

ERRORS : N O CALCULATIO N

ERROR S FLAGGE DFO RTHI S TES T COMMENTS : O N

BOAR DVE H 3 LA-4 S BAC KT O BAC KTAURU S RE D 3/1B GLA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 5

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T It 89-450 6 

## 3DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89450 6 198 8 LIGH TDUT YVEHICL E ANALYSI S I PROCESSED : 09:27:4 4 AU G 198 9
MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . 03 0 A193XEX-091 5 VERSIO N 0 EVA P

N REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC
ULATE S N REASO NFOR

CONFIRMATIO N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA G B Y BA G CUR B DRV

AXL E AXL E PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E 08-01-8 9 EMPT Y / IGNITIO NTIMIN G / # 1 # 2 RP M GEA R IDL E - %C O

HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA KCOASTDOW

N TIM E RPM GEA RPERIO D ACTUAL ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 I AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO XCV S "H GPOINT TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO

RALDEHYDE S RG E 29.2 4 / 43. 6 95. 6 D 16. 8 42.9 3 0.869 0

DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S / 27 C TES T DAT E H R 08-02-8 9 1 0 BA G 1 7.44 3 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C O 2 C O BA G 2 7.47 1 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O BA G 3 7.44 7 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R

SIT E I W SE T TWH P D20 9 362 5 4. 0 4 5 MILE S 11.97 9 K M 17355 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E METE R CONC . 1 4 49. 3 36.6 2 1 5 42. 9 21.2 7 2 3 37. 3 0.82 7 1 8 43. 3 184.4 3 MILE S 12.02 4 K M 17420 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E METE R CONC . 1 4 12. 4 9.0 6 1 5 47. 3 23.4 7 2 3 36. 0 0.79 6 1 8 30. 0 123.7 6 MILE S 11.98 5 K M 17364 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E METE R CONC . 1 4 11. 5 8.4 0 1 5 50. 2 24.9 2 2 3 36. 3 0.80 3 1 8 25. 2 102.8 5 3S I .0 0 ROL L (MI ) 9690. 4 REVS . BACKGROUN D RANG E 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 ROL L METE R

4. 8 0. 4 1 . 8 0. 0 REVS . BACKGROUN D RANG E 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 ROL L METE R

4. 4 0. 2 1 . 8 0. 0 REVS . BACKGROUN D RANG E 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 3 0. 3 1 . 8 0. 0 SYSTE M MILE S N/ A SAMPL E CONC . 3.4 9 0.2 0 0.03 7 0. 0
SAMPL E CONC . 3.2 0 0 . 1 0 0.03 7 0. 0
SAMPL E CONC . 3.1 3 0 . 1 5 0.03 7 0. 0 SECS .

CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 33.3 5 PP M 2 1 .0 9 PP M 0.79 3 % 184.4 3 PP M SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 6.0 5 PP M 23.3 8 PP M 0.76 1 % 123.7 6 PP M SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 5.4 6 PP M 24.7 8 PP M 0.76 9 X 102.8 5 PP M VMIX = 748 9 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 4.0 8 7.4 3 3075.4 0 45.5 4 VMIX = 741 7 GMS/M I

0.54 8 0.99 9 413.16 7 6.11 8 0 CU.FT . GMS/K M

0.34 1 0.62 0 256.73 0 3.80 2 DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 0.7 3 8.1 6 2926.2 0 30.2 6 VMIX = 739 9 GMS/M I

0.09 8 1 .09 2 391.65 6 4.05 1 0 CU.FT . GMS/K M

0.06 1 0.67 9 243.36 4 2.51 7 DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 0.6 6 8.6 3 2946.5 4 25.0 9 GMS/M I

0.08 9 1 . 15 9 395.65 0 3.36 9 GMS/K M

0.05 5 0.72 0 245.84 6 2.09 3 FACTO R = 15.77 6

AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD l FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 20. 9 8.8 8 11. 3
FACTO R = 16.55 3 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 22. 3 9.4 7 10. 6
FACTO R = 16.45 2 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD l FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 22. 1 9.4 0 10. 6 COMMENTS : ONBOAR D VE H 3 LA-4 S BAC K T O BAC K TAURU S RE D

3/1B G LA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 5 TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-450 6DYN O SITE : D20 9 TES T tt 89-450 6
TES T CONDITIONS : DAT E MM-DD-Y YTIM E TEST : 08-02-8 9 KEY-START : PREP : 08-01-8 9 KEY-OFF : CALCULATE DSOA KPERIO D= HR:M N 10:3 0 13:4 0 20. 8 I.D . TITL E NAM E REQUESTO R INSPECTOR AM A PRE P LA 4 PRE P DIURNAL DRIVE R SIT E OPER . DATA VAL . HOT-SOAK C FULLER

INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D I

I I I I I I I D D D D

. D D

. 0

. D DEPT .

ECT D I 198 8 DAT A INPU T -QC/QA - AN DERROR S REPOR T |

TES T PACKE T STATUS : NO T VALIDATE D

NUMBE R 1233 6

5476 8 5472 1 PROCESSED : 09:27:4 4 AU G3 , 198 9 DISPOSITIONS : VEHICL E DISP : CER T TES T DISP : F.E . TES T DISP :

ALTERNAT E HFI DSIT E NO . VOI DCODES : LAB : CERT : Q . C : INSTRUMEN T USAGES : PRE P DYNO : TES T DYNO : PRE P DYN O SITE :
PRETES T ADJUSTMENTS : WARNING , N O INPU T INDICATOR S FO RADJUSTMENT S QC/Q A CHECKS : OU T O F TOLERANC E CHECKS : 2 , 6 , 47 , 48 , INPU T DAT A

CHECKS : N O DAT A

INPU T ERROR S FLAGGE DFO RTHI S TES T CALCULATIO N

ERRORS : N O CALCULATIO N

ERROR S FLAGGE DFO RTHI S TES T COMMENTS : O N

BOAR DVE H 3 LA-4 S BAC KT O BAC KTAURU S RE D 3/1B GLA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 5

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T * • 89-450 6DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89450 6 198 8 LIGH T DUT Y VEHICL E ANALYSI S | PROCESSED : 09:27:4 4 AU G 3 , 198 9

MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . 03 0 A193XEX-091 5 VERSIO N 0 EVA P

N MFR .

REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC
- REASO NFO R

ULATE S CONFIRMATIO N N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA G B Y BA G CUR B DR V

AXL E AXL E PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E 08-01-8 9 EMPT Y # 1 IGNITIO NTIMIN G / '# 2 RP M GEA R IDL E - %C O HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA K COASTDOW NTIM E RP M GEA R PERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 I AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO X CV S "H G POIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO R ALDEHYDE S RG E 29.2 4 43. 6 95. 6 D 16. 8 42.9 3 0.869 0 / DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S /

DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R TES T DAT E H R SIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) 08-02-8 9 1 0 D20 9 362 5 4. 0 45.0 0 9690. 4 BA G 1 7.44 3 MILE S 11.97 9 K M 17355 . ROL L REVS . CONC . RANG E METE R 36.6 2 1 4 4. 8 21.2 7 1 5 0. 4 0.82 7 2 3 1. 8 184.4 3 1 8 0. 0 BA G 2 7.47 1 MILE S 12.02 4 K M 17420 . ROL L REVS . 27 C

IT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T S

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R 49. 3 42. 9 37. 3 43. 3 SYSTE M MILE S N/ A SAMPL E CONC . 3.4 9 0.2 0 0.03 7 0. 0 SECS .

CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 33.3 5 PP M 21.0 9 PP M 0.79 3 % 184.4 3 PP M SECS . VMIX = 7489. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N

MAS S EMISSION S GMS . GMS/M I 4.0 8 0.54 8 7.4 3 0.99 9 3075.4 0 413.16 7 45.5 4 6.11 8 VMIX = 7417. 0 CU.FT . GMS/K M 0.34 1 0.62 0 256.73 0 3.80 2 DILUTIO N FACTO R = 15.77 6

AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 20. 9 8.8 8 11. 3
FACTO R = 16.55 3 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E CORRECTE D

RANG E METE R CONC . RANG E METE R 1 4 12. 4 9.0 6 14 4. 4 1 5 47. 3 23.4 7 1 5 0. 2 2 3 36. 0 0.79 6 2 3 1. 8 1 8 30. 0 123.7 6 1 8 0. 0 CONC . CONCENTRATION S 3.2 0 6.0 5 PP M 0.1 0 23.3 8 PP M 0.03 7 0.76 1 % 0. 0 123.7 6 PP M GMS . 0.7 3 8.1 6 2926.2 0 30.2 6 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.09 8 1 .09 2 391.65 6 4.05 1 GMS/K M

0.06 1 0.67 9 243.36 4 2.51 7 AUX .

FIELD l AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22. 3 KP L

9.4 7 L/100K M

10. 6
BA G 3 7.44 7 MILE S 11.98 5 K M 17364 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E

RANG E METE R CONC . RANG E METE R 1 4 11. 5 8.4 0 1 4 4. 3 1 5 50. 2 24.9 2 1 5 0. 3 2 3 36. 3 0.80 3 2 3 1. 8 1 8 25. 2 102.8 5 1 8 0. 0 SECS . VMIX = 7399. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R CORRECTE D CONC . CONCENTRATION S 3.1 3 5.4 6 PP M 0.1 5 24.7 8 PP M 0.03 7 0.76 9 % 0. 0 102.8 5 PP M GMS . 0.6 6 8.6 3 2946.5 4 25.0 9 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.08 9 1 . 15 9 395.65 0 3.36 9 GMS/K M

0.05 5 0.72 0 245.84 6 2.09 3 AUX .

FIELD l 16.45 2

AUX . AUX . FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22 . 1 KP L

9.4 0 L/100K M

10. 6 COMMENTS : O NBOAR D VE H 3 LA-4 S BAC K T O BAC K TAURU S RE D

3/1B G LA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 5 TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T89-450 6 T I J >BAG 3 NO X CO . C O I I 

# w li m\\m\ i raaM 06| ' 10 1 1 9 | 

### BAC^Gpourj p A 

### ff

l SAMPL E PAW. E i t VEHICL E EXHAUS TSAMPL E RANG E # HC I NO

X | CO - , | C O | | H

C | NO XI CO - | C

O I 

# fti I N J 

# i l I \m\

I IdolliNlik-Ubll M ^05 | 1 0 | 1 5 | 2 0 | 2 5 | H C 1 H C | NO X I C0 2 

# \\\i\\ i s l 

# 5P 3

5 0 C O / 

# * 1 

# U SIT E 

## 5 n DISTANC E 

# mrnm e o 

# £ VM3 X O S COUNT S 

# n: 66 1 

# 212 1 SEC S

7 0 STEAD Y ( 2

STAT E SPEE D 7 5 •P BA G #1 BA G#2

BAG DAT A AU X HEL D 1

2 if l a a AU X HEL D 2

DIS PA EVA P . 0 5
LA B AU X COD E BACKGROUN D

HFI D 1 0 VOI D CODE S CER T I Q . C .

METHAN E BA G DAT A 0 5 BA G ffi -LO I S VOI D MA N HOURS R

G EXHAUS T

B U D 2 0 RG

2 5 

# P AU X

FIEL D 1
3 0 AU X

HEL D . 3 5 AU X

COD E BACKGROUN D

HFI D | R

G | 

### »8J ~ 1 1 4 5 EXJ-AUS T HFI D RG 

### so) AU X

HEL D 1 SS J BA G

AU X HEL D 2 6 0 # 3

AU X :OD E 6 5 BACKGROUN D

HFI D | RG I 7 0 1 EXHAUS T

HFI D | RG 

# J 7 5 | • 

## c

6 0

1 5 BACKGROUN

D METHANE R

G 0 5 EXHAUS T METHAN E

1 0 R G DAT A VALIDATO R I D
BAfli l . 2 0 BACKGROUN D METHAN E
1 5 RG EVA P LOS S GM S HOT-SOA K

EVA P I D 2 5 EXHAUS T METHAN E 2 0 R G ALDEHYDE S 3 0 -BX8 1 BACKGROUN D METHAN E I R G 2 5 I 3 0 TT a s EXHAUS T METHAN E I R G

3 5 7 0 PRE PTES T KE Y STAR T KE Y OF F H RI MI N 

# N 

# 6 7 5 H R 

# 1. 0 MIN ? 

# m C » 0

6 5 7 0 7 5 | I 

## • ° 

# ru n COMMENT S 

## 0

rl 

## p / 

## 1 

# fc 1\ ~\ (1 1 0, 5 CARD I I 

### _FJ U E L ( P

5 A ii

1 

## D ^
» A R • - 

## T

• , 1 0 CAL C F 

## s s LA O 

# M k i\ 0 1 " 1 i S CONTAINE R

I S )_
_ 

# 1 A

_ - I D • ri ' / ~7\ 2 0 VIFUE L ICOD 8 

## If

1 2 0 J 

# L a . . 

## K
2 5 ifBASURK

D BO CW tFRAC1 • 1 5 UN

I roN 

## r

E D 0 '' )

3 0 SPBC D GRAV I • 3 0 - I i .
IC T Y j 

## k 

# • r U • 1 

# 1 1 K
3 5 | *O T HEATIN

0 VAIXI
J 5 . 4 0 

# I (1 [
4 5 CONSTAN

T UNBOUNDE

D CW T FRACTIO

N • I S C ( 

# • 1 1 5 0 

# 1 INSTANT BOUND S CW T FRACTIO

N 

# 5 3 0 | D

i 

### s s ( DiNsm r LBS/OAL 

### 8 1 6 1 0 

# u 

# H AFTBRCOM

B • , 6 5
6 5 7 0 GMC/GA L



# __ r . 1 ro | 

# J 

# 1 1

7 6 | B C EMISSIO N DBNSIT Y • 7 5 > K

L

T I J >>

REFUELIN G EMISSION S TES T SUMMAR Y SHE D S10 1 ANALYZE R FI D 22 4 DAT E TES T VEHICL E VEHICL E FUE L H/ C o r RV P NOMINA L GALLON S SHE D INITIAL/FINA L I II I IN . NUMBE R VOLUM E MET H eqvGP M OIS P TEM P F BAR O PANG E DEFLEC T 890009.0 0 RRNG E 1 6 RE D O N50.0 0 IND 2.3 3 6.8 0 10.0 0 13.2 5 77.9 0 29.1 4 IF..0 0 9 AUG-2-8 9 TES T BOAR D FOR D fina l BI T 1 2 9 1 4 IF . 0 0 1 7 TAURU S



### r oINft

L PPM C 27.6 6 51-7 7 

### NE T

gm s 0.5 7 DIS P TEM P F 

### 83 . 1 0 TAN

K TEM P F 81.7 0 FI D ESTIMATE D CANISTE R GMS/'GA L GMS/GR L VENTING 0.0 4 4.9 1 OUT RE D TAURU S ONBOARD W/CANISTE R EFFECT S ONEMISSION END LA- 4 <3 > BACK7BRC K 0 9 5 DEG . CEL L TEM P W/9. 0 RVP.FUE L & 3. 0 LITE R CANISTE RREQUESTO RID : 1233 6 TES T # 89450 6 NAME : C . FULLE R REPOR T TIME : 15:10:2 7

DATE : JUL 25 . 198 9 VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO N REPOR T - (TESTN O GEN ) - DAT E O

F ENTR Y: 10/14/8 8 VEHICL E SPECIFICATION S MANUFACTURE RVEHICL E I D/ VERREPRESENTE DCARLIN E MODE L COD E DRIVE COD E SOURC E FORDA193XEX-091 5 0 SEDA N FRON T DRIVE STR . LEF T EP A DRIVE AX L WT EQUIV i ET W VEHICL E —YEAR — FUL L EMPT YCURB INERTI A TES T CD . SID E O DAC T A C RUNNIN

GCH G TYP E ACTUAL VEHICL E MODE L MD L AC T TAN KTAN

KWEIGH T CLAS S WEIGH T H.P . METHO DVE H FA N C DD

N H P H P NUMBER E F 1FABP52V3JG25951 7 8 8 8 8 350 0 362 5 N O ENTR Y6. 6 ODOMETE RTIR E SPECIFICATION S CORRECTIO N

TIR E & RI M

SW L BL T PS I T D ASSIGNE DDF O

RDURABILIT YVEHICL E I DALTERNAT E MANUFACTURE RINITIAL FACTORSIZE S MF RCONST RN M N M FT R RD P P205/75R1 4 ENGINE SPECIFICATION S RATE DENGIN E ENGINE NO . NO . TOTAL FUE L SYSTEN ' FUE L TURBO/SUPE RCOMP . COAS T DISPLACEMEN T BOR E STROK E H P TYP E CONFIGURATION CYL . CARB S BBL S MFR/MODE L IN JCHARGER.COOLIN GRATI O D N T M O.O E 0. 0 E 0. 0 E OTT O SPARKYE S NON E 0. 0

IGNITION

TIMIN GIDL E % C O IDL E ENGIN E »\ # 2 DE GTOL . RPM RP M TOL . GEA

RLEF T RIGH T COM B TOL . RP M

RPM TOL . GEA

RFAMIL YSYSTE M COD E

DRIVE TRAI N

AN DCONTRO L SYSTEM

SPECIFICATION S AXL E N/ V

A/ C CRANKCAS E — TRANSMISSIO N

— SHIF T INDIC . EVAPORATION RATI O RATI O ODOMETE RINSTALLE DEXHAUS T TYP E SYSTEM CONFI GMODI F COD E LIGH T SVSTEM FUE L TYP E 0. 0 0. 0 YE S A- 3 -N O ENTR YUNLEADE D(A T EPA-INDHO ) MAIN-TANKAUX.-TAN KSHIF T SCH . I DEVAPORATIVE EMISSIO N CAPACIT YVOLUM E CAPACIT YVOLUM E SHIF T SPEE DCIT YHW YFAMILYCOD E SALE S CLAS S 18.6 G7.4 GB FT A N O SALE S CLAS S SPECIFIE D $ CONTRO L SYSTEM

TYPE S

VEHICL E SPECIFICATION COMMENT S * SE E COMMENT S

1853 7 0RECUESTO RID : 1233 6 NAME : C . FULLE R REPOR T TIME : 15:10:2 7

DATE : JU L 25 , 198 9 VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO N REPOR T - (TESTN O GEN ) - DAT E O F ENTR Y: 10/14/8 8 TES T tt 89450 6

VEHICL E SPECIFICATION S MANUFACTURE R VEHICL E I D/ VE RREPRESENTE DCARLIN E MODE L COD E DRIV E COD E SOURC E A193XEX-091 5 0 SEDAN FRON T DRIV E STR . LEF T EP A FOR D DRIV E AX L W T EQUIV . VEHICL E —YEAR — FUL L EMPT YCUR B INERTI A TES T TYP E ACTUA L VEHICL E MODE L MD L AC T TAN KTAN KWEIGH T CLAS S WEIGH T H.P . METHO D ET W C D . SID E O DAC T A C RUNNIN GCH G VE H FA

N C DD N

H P H P NUMBE R E F 1 FABP52V3JG25951 7 8 8 8 8

ASSIGNE DD F O RDURABILIT YVEHICL E I D 350 0 362 5 N O ENTR Y

ALTERNAT E MANUFACTURE R ODOMETE R CORRECTIO N

TIR E 8 . RI M INITIA L FACTO RSIZE S 6. 6 TIR E SPECIFICATION S SW L BL T PS I T D MF RCONST RN M N M F T RRD P P205/75R1 4

DISPLACEMEN T O.O E BOR E

0. 0 E STROK E

0. 0 E
til IGNITIO N TIMIN G 02 DE GTOL . RP M

RP M TOL . RATE D

H P ENGIN E

TYP E ENGIN E SPECIFICATION S

ENGIN E CONFIGURATIO N NO . CYL . NO . TOTA L FUE L SYSTE M FUE L TURBO/SUPE RCOMP . COAS T CARB S BBL S MFR/MODE L IN JCHARGER.COO L IN GRATI O DN T M OTT O SPAR K YE S GEA R IDL E % c o

LEF T RIGH T COM B TOL . RP M - - IDL E RP M TOL . GEA R FAMIL Y NON E ENGIN E SVSTE M 0. 0

COD E

AXL E RATI O N/ V

A/ C RATI O ODOMETE RINSTALLE D DRIV E TRAI N AN DCONTRO L SYSTE M SPECIFICATION S
EXHAUS T TYP E CRANKCAS E — TRANSMISSIO N

- - SHIF T INDI C EVAPORATIO N SYSTE M CONFI GMODI F COD E LIGH T SVSTE M 0. 0 0. 0 MAIN-TAN K CAPACIT YVOLUM E YE S AUX.-TAN K CAPACIT YVOLUM E A- 3
SHIF T SPEE D SHIF T SCH . I D CIT YHW Y -N

O ENTR Y EVAPORATIV E EMISSIO N FAMIL YCOD E FUE L TYP E UNLEADE D(A T EPA-IN DHO )

SALE S CLAS S 18.6 G 7.4 G B FT A CONTRO L SVSTE M

TYPE S N O SALE S CLAS S SPECIFIE D

VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO N COMMENT S * SE E COMMENT S

1853 7*• REQUFSTO R ID : 1722 1 NAME : R . BRANHA M REPOR T TIME : 11:15:3 9

DATE : JU L 20 , 19B 9 

# fOOS
TES T it 89442 2

VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NREPOR T - (TESTN O GEN ) DAT E O F ENTR Y : 10/14/ S
VEHICL E SPECIFICATION S
MANUFACTURE R FOR D VEHICL E I D / VE R REPRESENTE D CARLIN E MODE L COD E DRIV E COD E A193XEX-091 5 0 SEDA NFRON T DRIV E STR . LEF T EP A ET W SOURC E

DRIV E AX L W T EQUIV . VEHICL E —YEAR- - FUL L EMPT Y CUR B INERTI ATES T CD . SID E O D AC T A C RUNNIN G CH G TYP E ACTUA L VEHICL E MODE L MD L AC T TAN K TAN K WEIGH T CLAS S WEIGH T H.P . METHO D VE H FA NC D D NH P H P NUMBE R E F 1FABP52V3JG25951 7 8 8 8 8 350 0 362 5 N O ENTR Y ODOMETE R CORRECTIO NTIR E 8 . RI M ASSIGNE D D F O R DURABILIT Y VEHICL E I D ALTERNAT E MANUFACTURE R INITIA L FACTO R SIZE S MF R 6 . 6 TIR E SPECIFICATION S SW L BL T PS I T D CONST R NM NM F T R R D P P205/75R1 4
ENGIN E SPECIFICATION S DISPLACEMEN T O.O E BOR E

0. 0 E RATE D ENGIN E

STROK E H P TYP E ENGIN E NO . NO . TOTA L FUE L SYSTE M FUE L TURBO/SUPE R COMP . COAS T CONFIGURATIO NCYL . CARB S BBL S MFR/MODE L IN J CHARGER,COO L IN G RATI O D NT M O.O E OTT O SPAR K YE S NON E 0. 0 IGNITIO NTIMIN G tt\ # 2 DE G TOL
. RP M RP M TOL
. GEA R IDL E % c o LEF T RIGH T COM B TOL . IDL E RP M RP M TOL . GEA R ENGIN E FAMIL Y SYSTE M COD E

DRIV E TRAI NAN D CONTRO L SYSTE M SPECIFICATION S AXL E N/ V

A/ C CRANKCAS E - - TRANSMISSIO N- - SHIF T INDI C EVAPORATIO N RATI O RATI O ODOMETE R INSTALLE D EXHAUS T TYP E SYSTE M CONFI G MODI F COD E LIGH T SYSTE M 0. 0 0. 0 YE S MAIN-TAN K AUX.-TANK . CAPACIT Y VOLUM E CAPACIT Y VOLUM E 18.6 G 7.4 G A- 3
SHIF T SPEE D -N O ENTR Y SHIF T SCH . I D EVAPORATIV E EMISSIO N CIT Y HW Y FAMIL Y COD E B FT A $ CONTRO L SYSTE M TYPE S FUL L TYP E UNLEADE D (A T EPA-IN D HO )

SALE S CLAS S N O SALE S CLAS S SPECIFIE D

VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NCOMMENT S * SE E COMMENT S

1853 7 0REQUESTO R ID : 1722 1 TES" 1 tt 89442 2 NAME : R . BRANHA M REPOR T TIME : 11:15:3 9

DATE : JU L 20 , 198 9 VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NREPOR T - (TESTN O GEN ) - DAT E O F ENTR Y : 10/14/8 8 VEHICL E SPECIFICATION S MANUFACTURE R VEHICL E I D / VE R REPRESENTE D CARLIN E MODE L COD E DRIV E COD E SOURC E FOR D A193XEX-091 5 0 SEDA NFRON T DRIV E STR . LEF T EP A DRIV E AX L W T EQUIV . ET W VEHICL E --YEAR- - FUL L EMPT Y CUR B INERTI ATES T CD . SID E O D AC T A C RUNNIN G CH G TYP E ACTUA L VEHICL E MODE L MD L AC T TAN K TAN K WEIGH T CLAS S WEIGH T H.P . METHO D VE H FA NC D D NH P H P NUMBE R E F 1FABP52V3JG25951 7 8 8 8 8 350 0 362 5 N O ENTR Y 6. 6 ODOMETE R TIR E SPECIFICATION S CORRECTIO NTIR E 8 , RI M SW L BL T PS I T D ASSIGNE D D F O R DURABILIT Y VEHICL E I D ALTERNAT E MANUFACTURE R INITIA L FACTO R SIZE S MF R CONST R NM NM F T R R D P P205/75R1 4
ENGIN E SPECIFICATION S RATE D ENGIN E ENGIN E NO . NO . TOTA L Fu'cLSYSTE M FUE L TURBO/SUPE R COM P . COAS T DISPLACEMEN T BOR E STROK E H P TYP E CONFIGURATIO NCYL . CARB S BBL S MFR/MODE L IN J CHARGER,COO L IN G RATI O D NT M O.O E 0. 0 E 0. 0 E OTT O SPAR K YE S HON E 0. 0

IGNITIO NTIMIN G IDL E % C O IDL E ENGIN E It) # 2 DE G TOL . RP M RP M TOL . GEA R LEF T RIGH T COM B TOL . RP M RP M TOL . GEA R FAMIL Y SYSTE M COD E

DRIV E TRAI NAN D CONTRO L SYSTE M SPECIFICATION S AXL E N/ V

A/ C CRANKCAS E - - TRANSMISSIO N- - SHIF T INDI C EVAPORATIO N RATI O RATI O ODOMETE R INSTALLE D EXHAUS T TYP E SYSTE M CONFI G MODI F COD E LIGH T SYSTE M FUE L TYP E 0. 0 0. 0 YE S A- 3 -N O ENTR Y UNLEADE D (A T EPA-IN D HO ) MAIN-TAN K AUX.-TAN K SHIF T SCH . I D EVAPORATIV E EMISSIO N CAPACIT Y VOLUM E CAPACIT Y VOLUM E SHIF T SPEE D CIT Y HW Y FAMIL Y COD E SALE S CLAS S 18.6 G 7.4 G B FT AN O SALE S CLAS S SPECIFIE D $ CONTRO L SYSTE M TYPE S

VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NCOMMENT S * SE E COMMENT S

1853 7 0• - / | 198 8 DAT AINPU T -QC/QA
- AN D ERROR S REPOR T |

DY N• SITE : D20 9 TES T tt 89-442 2 TES T CONDITIONS : DAT E MM-DD-Y Y TIM E TEST : 07-25-8 9 KEY-START : PREP : 07-24-8 9 KEY-OFF : CALCULATE D SOA K PERIO D = HR:M N 13:0 0 10:1 5 26. 8 TES T PACKE T STATUS : NO T VALIDATE D

I.D . TITL E NAM E REQUESTO R INSPECTO R AM APRE P LA 4 PRE P DIURNA L DRIVE R SIT E OPER . DAT AVAL . HOT-SOA K R . BRANHA M

INVALI DI.D . INVALI DI.D . INVALI DI.D . INVALI DI .D . INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . INVALI D I.D . DEPT . NUMBE R ECT D 1722 1

5476 8 5472 1 PROCESSED : 11:46:1 8 JU L 26 . 198 9 DISPOSITIONS : VEHICL E DISP : CER T TES T DISP : F.E . TES T DISP :

ALTERNAT E HFI D SIT E NO . VOI D CODES : LAB : CERT : Q.C. : INSTRUMEN T USAGES : PRE P DVNO : TES T DVNO :
PRE P DYN O SITE : PRETES T ADJUSTMENTS : WARNING , N O INPU T INDICATOR S FO R ADJUSTMENT S QC/Q ACHECKS : A OU T O F TOLERANC E CHECKS : 2 , 6 , 47 , 48 , INPU T DAT ACHECKS : N O DAT AINPU T ERROR S FLAGGE D FO R THI S TES T CALCULATIO NERRORS : N O CALCULATIO NERROR S FLAGGE D FO R THI S TES T COMMENTS : TAURU S RE D 3/ 1 B G LA4 S 9 5 DEGREE S F # 2

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89-442 2DYNO SITE:D20 9 TES T#89442 2 I 198 8 LIGH TDUT YVEHICL E ANALYSI S | PROCESSED : 11:46:1 8 JU L 26 , 198 9

MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . VERSIO N EVA P 0 3 0 A193XEX-091 5 0 N MFR . REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC -

ULATE S N REASO N FO R

CONFIRMATIO N / TES TTYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES TPROCEDUR E BA G B V BA G CUR B DR

V AXL E AXL E / — • PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E * 1 07-24-8 9 EMPT Y IGNITIO N TIMIN G/ # 2 RP M

GEA

R IDL E - %C O

HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA KCOASTDOW

N TIM E RP M GEA RPERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE

W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO XCV S "H GPOINT TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTORALDEHYDE S RG E 29.3 0 / 46. 7 96. 4 D 18. 5 48.2 6 0.888 3

- - - DYNAMOMETE R TES TCONDITION S / 27 C
TES T DAT E H R 07-25-8 9 1 3 BA G1 7.41 5 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O BA G2 7.49 3 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O BA G3 7.45 5 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O DYN O

SIT E D20 9 MILE S ACTUA L DYN O T

I W SE T TWH P 362 5 4. 0 4 5 11.93 4 KM

17289 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 MILE S METE RCONC .

40.6-^ T 30.0 7 42.0< / 20.8 2 36.9- ^ 0.81 8 35.2 / 146.9 8 12.05 8 KM

17470 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 MILE S METE RCONC .

12. 2 ^ 8.9 1 47.2 ^ 23.4 2 35.9/ " 0.79 4 32.2 / 133.5 0 1 1 .99 8 K M

17383 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE RCONC .

19.9 ^ 14.6 0 49.4-^ y

24.5 2 36.2 / 0.80 1 14.5 / 57.8 9 COMMENTS : TAURU S RE D 3/ 1 B GLA4 S IR E ODOMETE RSYSTE M PS I .0 0 ROL L (MI ) MILE S 9620. 8 N/ A REVS . BACKGROUN DSAMPL E RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 ROL L METE RCONC .

5.2 ^ 3.7 8 0.3^ , 0 . 1 5 1.7 ^ 0.03 5 0.0 ^ 0. 0 REVS . BACKGROUN DSAMPL E RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 ROL L METE RCONC .

4.8 ^ 3.4 9 0. 2 / 0.1 0 1.7. / 0.03 5 0.0 / 0. 0 REVS . BACKGROUN DSAMPL E RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE RCONC .

4.9 ^ 3.5 6 0.3- " 0.1 5 1 . 7 . / 0.03 5 0.0 / 0. 0 9 5 DEGREE S F # 2 SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 26.5 2 PP M 20.6 8 PP M 0.78 5 % 146.9 8 PP M

SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 5.6 3 PP M 23.3 3 PP M 0.76 1 % 133.5 0 PP M

SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 11.2 5 PP M 24.3 8 PP M 0.76 8 % 57.8 9 PP M VMIX = 753 3 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 3.2 6 7.5 0 3063.5 4 36.5 0 VMIX = 747 7 GMS/M I

0.44 0 1.01 1 413 . 14 6 4.92 3 0 CU.FT . GMS/K M

0.27 3 0.62 8 256.71 7 3.05 9 DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 0.6 9 8.3 9 2948 . 1 4 32.9 1 VMIX = 745 7 GMS/M I

0.09 2 1 . 12 0 393.46 4 4.39 2 0 CU.FT . GMS/K M

0.05 7 0.69 6 244.48 7 2.72 9 DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 1 .3 7 8.7 5 2967.8 5 14.2 3 GMS/M I

0 . 18 4 1 . 17 3 398.07 6 1 .90 9 GMS/K M

0 . 1 1 4 0.72 9 247.35 3 1 . 18 6 FACTO R= 16.04 0

AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD l FIELD 2 COD E MP GKP L L/100K M 21. 0 8.9 3 11. 2
FACTO R= 16.58 2 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD l FIELD 2 COD E MP GKP L L/100K M 22. 1 9.4 1 10. 6
FACTO R= 16.57 9 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD l FIELD 2 COD E MP GKP L L/100K M 22. 1 9.3 9 10. 7

TH E FUE L ECONOM YVALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN TFUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS . I

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-442 2 v

# K

I 

# N 

# V ^-

^ 

### \ 

# "f t W P.5 1



### i 

# N 

# (

V V 6Q v 

# ^ a iy>^

-rtJEi TYP E , UNLEADED . IND . 3 0 .IND . I S .DIESE L 

# VEHICL E TES TDAT A SHEE T SCHEDULE D TES TDAT E HWFE TYE

S •N O •

X o X . 

# rf TO MF R RE P INITIA L

- -

- '.. ' TES TNO . f /" " 7 5 '•' / > A

9 0 DRIV E 1 AXL E 1 WEIGH T 

# r j U l



### 'i < O 7 0 MEASURED I COASTDOWN TIM E tSEC ) I DV L

H P TS • B

8 0 CV S PRES S I N OU T

BA G 1 BACKGROUN D H C f • I NO X 9 S i 

### ' 1 AI

R SAMPL E C0 2
1 0 • y C O |

1 

# a s 

# 1 | H C | 

### f RANG E #

NO X i 2 0 * ) CO ! | C O 

## " 1 i 2 5 

# OT^ ICL E EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E# 

# J>^ " 1

- 3 0 NO X 3 3 C0 2 | C O | 4 0 

## £ L % | II C 

# 1 4 5 . , NO X

. C 0 2

-

5 0 C O

1 '- V

BA C 2 BACKGROUN D AI RSAMPL E RANG E # VEHICL E EXHAUS T SAMP I VNGEJ L H C 

## t c 

## 6 NO X O S C0 2

1 

### -Ck. 1 0 

# o C O

i » T 

# J H C NO X

2 0 1 C 0 2 C O 

## M l 2 3 

# w H C NO X 3 0 CQ 2

BA C 3 BACKGROUN D AI RSAMPL E PANT. F i t 3 5 VEHICL E EXHAUS T 

## Z3.3 I II C



# f l 4 5 NO>f c

f • " i C0 2 

### 1 — f - ' 5 0 C O rj 

# u

5 

# y 7 5 8 0 

## 1 • 

# U S S SIT E N O 

### '}..('. 

## "2 1 —7/ 1 ,- » DISTANCE" ) 

## ."J^ ? 6 0 I _ 5 « 'O - Z / = 

### a VMI X O R

COUNT S 

# $75 J5 1 / 

### 5 " > 3 

### 3 

# 3 ,
- »« 

### r o SEC S STEAD Y

STAT E SPEE D TSUNITS D

B 0 SIT E N O 

# A - i n 9 5 | J DISTANC E _

'*. 6 0 

### ^U 

## 7UNITS VMD C O R COUNT S 

# A 7 4 I S '-I

1 —- ; SEC S l 7 0 | STEAD Y

STAT E SPEE D TiUNITS E

B 0 JG E H C •A 

## H NO X I. C0 2 *—L C O

BA G DAT A AU X FIEL D I

DIS PA EVA P 

### 5 £ 8 BA G #1 

### y 1 5 

# M

H C NO X 2 0 1 C0 2 C O

2 T 

# P H C

3 0 NO X 3 5 C0 2 1 " C O



# • J ' «o | 

# 1 M H

C 

# -• ] 4 5 1 NO X C 0 2 

# • I : 5 0 C O 

## i X

# y 1 1 5 5 SIT E N O 1 / i • J DISTANC E

\ • 6 0 " ' '? % "JUNITS

IS 'A 6 5 VMI X O K1 COUNT S | 

# 11 hl\

7 0 SEC S | STEAD Y

STAT E SPEE D 7 - |UNITS F

8 0 BA G #2 AU X HEL D 2 0 5
LA B 1 0

VOI D CODE S AU X

COD E BACKGROUND

HFI DI R G

METHAN E BA

GDAT A CER T Q C . 

# is m BACKGROUN D METHAN E I R O

0 5 -LO I S VOI D MA N HOUR S EXHAUS T HFI D 2 0 R G

2 5 

# ¥ A U X

HEL D I ) 0 | A U X

FIEL D 2 3 5 A U X

COD E BACKGROUN D

HFI D R G
*"iT 4 5 1 EXlUtJs f HFI D R G 1 5 0 AU X

HEL D I 5 5 BA

G AU X HEL D 2 6 0 # 3

AU X -OD E 6 5 BACKGROUN D

HFI D | R G 

# 1 7 0 EXHAUS T

HFI D R G | ^ J 7 5 G 8 0 DAT A

EXHAUS T METHAN E

1 0 R G 1 5 VALIDATO R I D JSS I BACKGROUN D METHAN E
1 5 R G 2 0 EVA P LOS S GM S HO T - SOA K

EVA P I D 2 5 ALDEHYDE S

EXHAUS T METHAN E 2 0 R C 3 0 | BA G * 3 JL L BACKGROUN D METHAN E I R G
2 5 3 0 EXHAUS T METHAN E IR G

3 5 7 0 » M t PRE P KE Y OF F H R| MI N 

### J. /-' 

### ,6

7 5 TES T KE Y STAR T H R 

# 1 MI N 

# 3 £ 

# c H

8 0

7 0 7 5 8 0
COMMENT S ! : i 'J '!

0 5 CAR D I I F U E L

< P ) 5 | )A R * 1 0

CAL C n LA O 

# • # 1 5

CONTAINE R

1 5 I D 2 0

VIFUE L 1 COD E 1

2 0 | 2 5 MEASURE

D R O CW T FRAC 1 • 2 5 UNI

•ON 

# • 3 0 1

SPECIFI C GRAVIT Y • 3 0 3 5

SE T II I
3 5 SATIN G VALU E

. 4 6 

# i 4 5 CONSTAN

T UNRO I CW T FRACT 

# n • tI S INDE D IO N C

< 

# • 5 0 INSTANT ROUND

E CW T FRACTIO

N 

# r • 

### so | s

5 8

5 6 0 DENSITY LBS/GAL I • 6 0 * C AFTERCOM B 

# r • 

## e s U 

# M 7 0 GMC/GA L 

# r 1

.

7 0 

# J 

# H 7 j H C EMISSIO

N DENSIT Y y " • 7 5 K

L 8 0 

# BB Q 8 0 3/» * (NOT E ) SE E SEPARAT E INSTRUCTION S FO R" Q " CAR D NOTE : RIGH T JUSTIF Y AL L NUMERI C FIELDS , LEF T JUSTIF Y AL L ALPH A • NUMERI C FIELD S

# roo^

DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89442 1 198 8 LIGH T DUT Y VEHICL E ANALYSI S | PROCESSED : 10:45:4 0 JU L 3 1 198 9

MF R . COD E VEHICL E I.D . VERSIO NEVA P 03 0 A193XEX-091 5 0 N MFR . REP . INITIA L RU N.

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC
ULATE S N REASO NFO R

CONFIRMATIO N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA G B Y BA G CUR B DR V

AXL E AXL E PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E 07-20-8 9 EMPT Y tt\ IGNITIO NTIMIN G / # 2 RP M GEA R IDL E - % C O HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA K COASTDOW NTIM E RP M GEA R PERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO X CV S "H G POIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO R ALDEHYDE S RG E 29.1 3 50. 2 94. 6 D 22. 2 55.4 3 0.915 8 27 C / DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S /

DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R SYSTE M TES T DAT E H R SIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S 07-21-8 9 14 D20 9 362 5 4. 0 45.0 0 9093. 3 N/ A BA G 1 7.43 6 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O BA G 2 7.4 7 1 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O MILE S 11.96 7 K M 17337 .

EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 MILE S METE R

30. 0 4 8 . 7 36 . 2 41. 6 12.02 3 CONC .

22.1 2 24 . 1 7 0.80 1 176.4 4 K M 17419 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

12. 7 5 1 . 2 35. 9 34. 2 CONC .

9 . 2 8 25.4 2 0.79 4 142.4 6 ROL L REVS .

BACKGROUN D RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 ROL L METE R

4. 6 0. 8 1 . 8 0. 0 REV S . BACKGROUN D RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 6 0. 4 1 . 7 0. 0 SAMPL E

CONC . 3.3 4 0.3 9 0.03 7 0. 0
SAMPL E CONC . 3.3 4 0.2 0 0.03 5 0. 0 SECS .

CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 18.9 8 PP M 23.8 0 PP M 0.76 6 % 176.4 4 PP M SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 6.1 4 PP M 25.2 3 PP M 0.76 1 % 142.4 6 PP M VMIX = 746 8 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GM S . 2. 3 1 8.8 1 2964.8 6 43.4 4 VMIX = 741 5 GMS/M I

0.31 1 1 . 18 5 398.73 1 5.84 2 0 CU.FT . GMS/K M

0 . 19 3 0 . 73 7 247.76 0 3.63 0 DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GM S . 0 . 7 4 9 . 2 8 2923.7 1 34.8 3 GMS/M I

0.09 9 1 . 24 2 3 9 1.34 5 4.66 2 GMS/K M

0.06 2 0.77 2 24 3 . 17 0 2.89 7 FACTO R = 16.32 4

AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD l FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 21. 7 9.2 2 10. 8
FACTO R = 16.56 3 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD l FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 22. 2 9.4 5 10. 6
COMMENTS : 3/ 1 B G LA-4 S TAURU S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F tt\ O NBOAR D RUNNIN G LOS E
TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-442 1DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89442 1 198 8 LIGH T DUT Y VEHICL E ANALYSI S | PROCESSED : 10:45:2 4 JU L 31 , 198 9

MF R . COD E VEHICL E I.D . VERSIO NEVA P 03 0 A193XEX-091 5 0 N MF R . REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y ALT . H . P . MET H PARTIC
- REASO NFO R

ULATE S CONFIRMATIO N N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA G B Y BA G CUR B DR V

AXL E AXL E PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E 07-20-8 9 EMPT Y tt\ IGNITIO NTIMIN G / # 2 RP M GEA R IDL E - % C O HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA K COASTDOW NTIM E RP M GEA R PERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO X CV S "H G POIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO R ALDEHYDE S RG E 29.1 3 50. 2 94. 6 D 22. 2 55.4 3 0.915 8 27 C / DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S /

DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R SYSTE M TES T DAT E H R SIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S 07-21-8 9 1 4 D20 9 362 5 4. 0 45.0 0 9093. 3 N/ A BA G 1 7.43 6 MILE S 11.96 7 K M 17337 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R 30. 0 48. 7 36. 2 41. 6 CONC .

22 . 1 2 24 . 1 7 0.80 1 176.4 4 BACKGROUN D SAMPL E

RANG E 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 6 0. 8 1 . 8 0. 0 CONC .

3.3 4 0.3 9 0.03 7 0. 0 SECS . VMIX = 7468. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.32 4

CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 18.9 8 PP M 23.8 0 PP M 0.76 6 % 176.4 4 PP M GMS . 2.3 1 8.8 1 2964.8 6 43.4 4 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.31 1 1 . 18 5 398.73 1 5.84 2 GMS/K M

0 . 19 3 0.73 7 247.76 0 3.63 0 AUX .

FIELD l AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 21. 7 KP L

9.2 2 L/100K M

10. 8
BA G 2 7.47 1 MILE S 12.02 3 K M 17419 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN D SAMPL E HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O RANG E

1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

12. 7 51. 2 35. 9 34. 2 CONC .

9.2 8 25.4 2 0.79 4 142.4 6 RANG E

14 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 6 0. 4 1 . 7 0. 0 SECS . VMIX = 7415. 0 CU.FT . CORRECTE D DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.56 3 MAS S EMISSION S AUX . AUX . AUX . CONC . CONCENTRATION S GMS . 3.3 4 6.1 4 PP M 0.7 4 0.2 0 25.2 3 PP M 9.2 8 0.03 5 0.76 1 %2923.7 1 0. 0 142.4 6 PP M 34.8 3 GMS/M I 0.09 9 1 . 24 2 39 1 .34 5 4.66 2 GMS/K M

0.06 2 0.77 2 243.17 0 2.89 7 FIELD l FIELD 2 COD E

MP G KP L L/100K M 22. 2 9.4 5 10. 6
COMMENTS : 3/ 1 B G LA-4 S TAURU S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 1 O NBOAR D RUNNIN G LOS E
TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-442 1DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89442 1 198 8 LIGH T DUT Y VEHICL E ANALYSI S PROCESSED : 10:45:2 4 JU L 3 1 198 9

MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . VERSIO NEVA P 03 0 A193XEX-091 5 0 N MFR . REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y ALT . H . P . MET H PARTIC
ULATE S N REASO NFO R

CONFIRMATIO N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA G B Y BA G CUR B DR V

AXL E AXL E /--
- PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E # 1 07-20-8 9 EMPT Y IGNITIO NTIMIN G / # 2 RP M GEA R IDL E - % C O HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA K COASTDOW NTIM E RP M GEA R PERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO X CV S "H G POIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO R ALDEHYDE S RG E 29.1 3 50. 2 94. 6 D 22. 2 55.4 3 0.915 8 27 C / DYNAMOMETE R TES T CONDITION S /

DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R SYSTE M TES T DAT E H R SIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S 07-21-8 9 1 4 D20 9 362 5 4. 0 45.0 0 9093. 3 N/ A BA G 1 7.43 6 MILE S 11.96 7 K M 17337 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7468. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO NFACTO R = 16.32 4 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O BA G 2 7.47 1 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 MILE S METE R

30. 0 48. 7 36. 2 41. 6 12.02 3 CONC .

22 . 1 2 24 . 1 7 0.80 1 176.4 4 K M 17 4 19 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

12. 7 51. 2 35. 9 34. 2 CONC .

9.2 8 25.4 2 0.79 4 142.4 6 BACKGROUN D

RANG E 14 1 5 2 3 1 8 ROL L METE R

4. 6 0. 8 1 . 8 0. 0 3EVS . BACKGROUN D RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 6 0. 4 1 . 7 0. 0 SAMPL E

CONC . 3.3 4 0.3 9 0.03 7 0. 0
SAMPL E CONC . 3.3 4 0.2 0 0.03 5 0. 0 CORRECTE D

CONCENTRATION S 18.9 8 PP M 23.8 0 PP M 0.76 6 % 176.4 4 PP M SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 6.1 4 PP M 25.2 3 PP M 0.76 1 % 142.4 6 PP M MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 2.3 1 8.8 1 2964.8 6 43.4 4 VMIX = 741 5 GMS/M I

0.31 1 1 . 18 5 398.73 1 5.84 2 0 CU.FT . GMS/K M

0 . 19 3 0.73 7 247.76 0 3.63 0 DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 0 . 7 4 9 . 2 8 2923.7 1 34.8 3 GMS/M I

0.09 9 1 . 24 2 3 9 1.34 5 4 . 66 2 GMS/K M

0.06 2 0 . 77 2 243.17 0 2.89 7 AUX . AUX . AUX .

FIELD l FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 21. 7 9.2 2 10. 8
FACTO R = 16.56 3 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E MP G KP L L/100K M 22. 2 9.4 5 10. 6
COMMENTS : 3/ 1 B G LA-4 S TAURU S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 1 O NBOAR D RUNNIN G LOS E
TH E FUE L ECONOM Y VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN G CONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-442 1198 8 DAT AINPU T -QC/QA
- AN D ERROR S REPOR T |

DYN O SITE : D20 9 TES T tt 89-442 1 PROCESSED : 10:45:2 4 JU L 31 ; 198 9 TES T CONDITIONS : DAT E MM-DD-Y Y TIM E TEST : 07-21-8 9 KEY-START : PREP : 07-20-8 9 KEY-OFF : CALCULATE D SOA K PERIO D = HR:M N 14:3 0 13:0 5 25. 4 TES T PACKE T STATUS : NO T VALIDATE D DISPOSITIONS : VEHICL E DISP : CER T TES T DISP : F.E . TES T DISP :
I.D . TITL E NAM E DEPT . NUMBE R REQUESTO R INSPECTO R AM APRE P LA 4 PRE P DIURNA L DRIVE R SIT E OPER . DATAVAL . HOT-SOA K R . BRANHA M

INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D INVALI D I

I I I I I I I D D D D D D D D ECT D 1722 1

5476 8 5472 1

ALTERNAT E HFI D SIT E NO. : VOI D CODES : LAB : CERT : Q.C . : INSTRUMEN T USAGES : PRE P DYNO : TES T DYNO :
PRE P DVN O SITE : PRETES T ADJUSTMENTS : WARNING , N O INPU T INDICATOR S FO R ADJUSTMENT S , 

# ?E^_^EE?f : J99^> *£$ ^Qlk £J K
OU T O F TOLERANC E CHECKS : 2 , 6 , 47 , k^*" » INPU T DAT ACHECKS : N O DAT AINPU T ERROR S FLAGGE D FO R THI S TES T CALCULATIO NERRORS : N O CALCULATIO NERROR S FLAGGE D FO R THI S TES T COMMENTS : 3/ 1 B G LA-4 S TAURU S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 1 O NBOAR D RUNNIN G LOS E

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T tt 89-442 1P.5 7 

# SWc' X INC

.

PROBLE

M REPOR

T ^s 

## Pulle db y jCk^yws, — Dat e *7 " 311 01 IDENTIT Y

HtetttCt e Numbe r

^ j - ^ ^

f 2

- [ Tes t Typ e i ^/^ ^

C WC ^ "T o (~<?7l&?JtV CytrQ^ " AJC TJpg/^/A/c^' . 

## PROBLE M

RESOLUTION Resolve d b

yDat e Approve d b

y DESCRIPTIO N* . " 1 ^*QUESTO R ID : 1722 1 TES T tt 89442 1 NAME : R . BRANHA M REPOR T TIME : 11:15:3 5

DATE : JU L 20 , 198 9 VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NREPOR T - (TESTN O GEN ) - DAT E O F ENTR Y : 10/14/8 8 VEHICL E SPECIFICATION S MANUFACTURE R VEHICL E I D / VE R REPRESENTE D CARLIN E MODE L COD E DRIV E COD E SOURC E FOR D A193XEX-091 5 0 SEDA NFRON T DRIV E STR . LEF T EP A DRIV E AX L W T EQUIV . ET W VEHICL E —YEAR —FUL L EMPT Y CUR B INERTI ATES T CD . SID E O D AC T A C RUNNIN G CH G TYP E ACTUA L VEHICL E MODE L MD L AC T TANK TANK WEIGH T CLAS S WEIGH T H.P . METHO D VE H FA NC D DNH P H P NUMBE R E F 1FABP52V3JG259 5 1 7 8 8 8 8 350 0 362 5 N O ENTR Y 6. 6 ODOMETE R TIR E SPECIFICATION S CORRECTIO NTIR E & RI M SW L BL T PS I T D ASSIGNE D D F OR DURABILIT Y VEHICL E I D ALTERNAT E MANUFACTURE R INITIA L FACTO R SIZE S MF R CONST R NM NM F T RR D P P205/75R1 4 ENGIN E SPECIFICATION S RATE D ENGIN E ENGIN E NO . NO . TOTA L FUE L SYSTE M FUE L TURBO/SUPE R COMP . COAS T DISPLACEMEN T BOR E STROK E H P TYP E CONFIGURATIO NCYL . CARB S BBL S MFR/MODE L IN J CHARGER,COOLIN G RATI O D NT M O.O E 0. 0 E 0. 0 E OTT O SPAR K YE S NON E 0. 0

IGNITIO NTIMIN G IDL E % C O IDL E ENGIN E tn # 2 DE G TOL . RP M RP M TOL . GEAR LEF T RIGH T COM B TOL . RP M RP M TOL . GEAR FAMIL Y SYSTE M COD E

DRIV E TRAI NAN D CONTRO L SYSTE M SPECIFICATION S AXL E N/ V

A/ C CRANKCAS E —TRANSMISSIO N—SHIF T INDIC . EVAPORATIO N RATI O RATI O ODOMETE R INSTALLE D EXHAUS T TYP E SYSTE M CONFI G MODI F COD E LIGH T SYSTE M FUE L TYP E 0. 0 0. 0 YE S A- 3 -N O ENTR Y UNLEADE D (A T EPA-IN D HO ) MAIN-TAN K AUX.-TAN K SHIF T SCH . I D EVAPORATIV E EMISSIO N CAPACIT Y VOLUM E CAPACIT Y VOLUM E SHIF T SPEE D CIT Y HW Y FAMIL Y COD E SALE S CLAS S 18.6 G 7.4 G B FT ANO SALE S CLAS S SPECIFIE D S CONTRO L SYSTE M TYPE S

VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NCOMMENT S * SE E COMMENT S

1853 7 0+ '. £"*t)UESTO R ID : 1722 1 TES T tt 89442 1 ..-f* " • NAME : R . BRANHA M I REPOR T TIME : 11:15:3 5

DATE : JU L 20 , 198 9 VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NREPOR T - (TESTN O GEN ) - DAT E O F ENTR Y : 10/14/8 8 VEHICL E SPECIFICATION S
MANUFACTURE R VEHICL E I D / VE R REPRESENTE D CARLIN E MODE L COD E DRIV E COD E SOURC E FOR D A193XEX-091 5 0 SEDA NFRON T DRIV E STR . LEF T EP A DRIV E AX L W T EQUIV . ET W VEHICL E —YEAR —FUL L EMPT Y CUR B INERTI ATES T CD . SID E O D AC T A C RUNNIN G CH G TYP E ACTUA L VEHICL E MODE L MD L AC T TAN K TAN K WEIGH T CLAS S WEIGH T H.P . METHO D VE H FA NC D D NH P H P NUMBE R E F 1FABP52V3JG25951 7 8 8 8 8 350 0 362 5 N O ENTR Y 6. 6 ODOMETE R TIR E SPECIFICATION S CORRECTIO NTIR E & RI M SW L BL T PS I T D ASSIGNE D D F O R DURABILIT Y VEHICL E I D ALTERNAT E MANUFACTURE R INITIA L FACTO R SIZE S MF R CONST R NM NM F T R R D P P205/75R1 4 ENGIN E SPECIFICATION S RATE D ENGIN E ENGIN E NO . NO . TOTA L FUE L SYSTE M FUE L TURBO/SUPE R COMP . COAS T DISPLACEMEN T BOR E STROK E H P TYP E CONFIGURATIO NCYL . CARB S BBL S MFR/MODE L IN J CHARGER,COOLIN G RATI O D NT M O.O E 0. 0 E 0. 0 E OTT O SPAR K YE S NON E 0. 0

IGNITIO NTIMIN G IDL E %C O IDL E ENGIN E tn # 2 DE G TOL . RP M RP M TOL . GEA R LEF T RIGH T COM B TOL . RP M RP M TOL . GEA R FAMIL Y SYSTE M COD E

DRIV E TRAI NAN D CONTRO L SYSTE M SPECIFICATION S AXL E N/ V

A/ C CRANKCAS E —TRANSMISSIO N- - SHIF T INDIC . EVAPORATIO N RATI O RATI O ODOMETE R INSTALLE D EXHAUS T TYP E SVSTE M CONFI G MODI F COD E LIGH T SYSTE M FUE L TYP E 0. 0 0. 0 YE S A- 3 -N O ENTR Y UNLEADE D (A T EPA-IN D HO ) MAIN-TAN K AUX.-TAN K SHIF T SCH . I D EVAPORATIV E EMISSIO N CAPACIT Y VOLUM E CAPACIT Y VOLUM E SHIF T SPEE D CIT Y HW Y FAMIL Y COD E SALE S CLAS S 18.6 G 7.4 G B FT AN O SALE S CLAS S SPECIFIE D $ CONTRO L SYSTE M TYPE S

VEHICL E SPECIFICATIO NCOMMENT S * SE E COMMENT S

1853 7P.6 0
/ 

# t00f 

# life - Id 

# / 

# »/fd
nb~u/-

.

- 

# c-nnjl

us*--

_ _. _ yVO^<2y{£A^vf
.

sM crvtMnJ

• • - 

# tU

TUtf-t- ,

- CTyJ(rTr>^Jl-

- 

# -^t^fc , 7

—

--

^P.6 1 

# ftlO Onboar d Tauru s - "Rust " i n fue l tan k an d fille rneck
. Som e smal l amoun t ofrus t ha s forme d o n th e "overflow " tub e an d o n th e surface s o fth e tan k

wher e th e overflo wtub e an d th e ven t valv e modification s were made
. Som e smal l amoun t ofrust has forme d at th e en d ofth e fille r nec k wher e i t wa s modifie d t o accep t th e chec k ball
. Whil e not visibl e som e rustin g ma

yexis t i n th e fille rnec k wher e th e origina l ven t tub e wa s remove d an d where pressure tap s were added
. Overall , th e rustin g i s mino ran d wil l probabl ynot pos e an yproblem
. Th e simples t "solution " would , therefore , b e t o leav e th e syste m a s i s fo rpurpose s ofhig h temperatur e testing
. Possibl e solution s t o th e rus t problem
. Most radical
. Buil d a complet e ne wtank/fille rnec k syste m ou t ofstainles s steel
. Thi s syste m woul d have t o employnon-stampe d part s fo rth e tan k an d woul d not represen t a stoc k productio n system
. I t woul d b e ver y costl yan d woul d requir e complet e retes t an d redevelopment^ th e system.Thi s approac h i s not recommended
. Les s radical
. Make overflo wtube.ven t valv e moun t an d splas h baffl e an d chec k bal l holde rou t ofstainles s stee l wit h ai l solderin g performe d awawfro m th e tank
. Moun t newcomponent s o n th e tan k byboltin g an d sealin g wit h fue l tan k

lea k sea l ( use d i n som e area s o fth e existin g system)
. Wit h applicatio n oflef k

sea l t o edge s oftan k

where bas e mil d stee l oftan k i s expose d bycutting , corrosio n coul d b e controlled
. Leakag e a t bolte d joint s ma

yb e a proble m a s th e tan k flexes
. Syste m woul d requir e retestin g t o ensur e correct operation
. Least radica l change
. Employproces s use d commerciall yi n repai rof existin g fue l tanks
. Involve s sandblastin g ofinsid e ofth e tan k followe d b yapplicatio n ofa liqui d coatin g an d finall ybakin g ofth e coatin g (bakin g i s require d t o solidifyth e coating)
. Bakin g temperatur e i s abou t 300F
. Use rofproces s i s checkin g wit h manufacture rofth e product t o determin e whethe ri t ca n b e use d wit h newe rtan k whic h contai n plasti c"buckets " as pick-u p chamber s fo rth e fue l pump . I fal l san d i s no t remove d fro m tan k o rtrappe d bycoating , fue l pum p damag e ma yoccur . Cos t estimat e i s $7 5 fo rinsid e oftan k

an d fille rneck
. (Sourc e fo rgalvanizin g ha s not bee n identified
. Concern s exis t wit h respect t o temperatur e ofapplicatio n (plasti cbucket ) an d wit h respect t o adhesio n ofplatin g t o solde rjoint s at overflo wtub e an d ven t valv e mount)
.P.6 2 

# fr>U Onboar d Tauru s - "Rust " i n fue l tan k an d fille rneck
. 10/18/9 0 Som e smal l amoun t ofrust ha s forme d o n th e "overflow " tub e an d o n th e

surface s o

fth e tan k

wher e th e overflo wtub e an d th e ven t valv e modification s were made
. Asmal l amoun t ofrust ha s als o forme d a t th e en d ofth e fille r nec k where i t wa s modifie d to accep t th e chec k ball
. I n al l cases , th e presenc e ofrus t wa s exhibite d bya ver yligh t discoloratio n ofth e surfaces
. Whil e not visible , som e rustin g ma yexis t i n th e fille rnec k wher e th e origina l ven t tub e wa s remove d an d where pressure tap s were added
. Overall , th e rustin g i s mino ran d wil l probabl ynot pos e an yproblem
. Th e simples t "solution " would , therefore , b e t o leav e th e syste m a s i s fo rpurpose s ofhig h temperatur e testing
. Othe rpossibl e solution s t o th e "rus t problem"
. Mos t radical
. Buil d a complet e newtank/fille rnec k syste m ou t ofstainles s steel
. Thi s syste m woul d have t o employnon-stampe d part s fo rth e tan k an d woul d not represen t a stoc k productio n system
. I t woul d b e ver y costl yan d woul d require complet e retes t an d redevelopmen t ofth e system.Thi s approac h shoul d not b e employed
. Les s radical
. Make overflo wtube , ven t valv e moun t an d splas h baffl e an d chec k bal l holde rou t ofstainles s stee l wit h al l solderin g performe d of fo f th e tank
. Moun t newcomponent s o n th e tan k b yboltin g an d sealin g wit h fue l tan k

lea k sea l ( use d i n som e area s ofth e existin g system)
. Wit h applicatio n oflea k

sea l t o edge s o

ftan k where bas e stee l oftan k i s expose d bycutting , corrosio n coul d b e controlled
. Leakag e at bolte d joint s ma

yb e a proble m as th e tan k flexes
. Syste m woul d requir e retestin g t o ensur e correct operation
. Leas t radica l change
. Employproces s use d commerciall yi n repai rof existin g fue l tanks
. Involve s sandblastin g ofinsid e o fth e tan k followe d b yapplicatio n ofa liqui d coatin g an d finall ybakin g ofth e coatin g (bakin g i s require d t o harde n th e coating)
. Bakin g temperatur e i s abou t 300F
. Use rofproces s i s checkin g wit h manufacture rofth e product t o determin e whethe ri t ca n b e use d wit h newe rtank s whic h contai n plasti c"buckets " a s pick-u p chambers fo rth e fue l pump . I fal l san d i s not remove d fro m tan k o rtrappe d b

ycoating , fue l pum p damag e ma yoccur . Cost estimat e i s $7 5 fo rinsid e o ftan k

an d fille rneck
. 10/19/ 9 0 Product manufacture rindicate s n o experienc e wit h Ford Tauru s

tanks
. Experienc e wit h G M tanks wit h plasti cbucket s ha s bee n tha t som e g o throug h bakin g proces s withou t damag e to plasti cbucke t whil e bucket s i n othe r tanks melt
. EP

Aha s som e extra Tauru s tanks , tr yon e an d see . Becaus e ofvariability i n effect s o fbakin g G M tanks , on e tes t o n a Tauru s tan k ma yonl yprovid e a 50/5 0 chanc e ofsucces s i fproble m i s not experience d wit h firs t tank
. (Sourc e fo rgalvanizin g ha s not bee n identified
. Concern s exis t wit h respect t o temperatur e ofapplicatio n (plasti cbucket ) an d wit h respect t o adhesio n ofplatin g t o solde rjoint s at overflo wtub e an d ven t valv e mount)
. 10/ 2 3/ 9 0 Franc e decide d t o leav e th e tan k an d fille rnec k

a s is ; i.e
. n o surfac e treatment
.P.6 3



### Onboar d Tauru s - Fuelin g followin g tan k remova l fo rinspectio n ( Oct
. 1990 ) 10/23/90
. Tan k

an d dispense d fue l (Indolene ) a t approximatel y7 5 F
. 1. 0 t o 1. 5 gallon s i n tan k

prio rt o fueling
. Fuelin g rat e of1 5 gpm . 13. 5 ga l dispense d throug h thre e shut-offs
. N o fuelin g problems
. Fue l gag e indicate d jus t unde r ful l followin g fueling
. 10/24/90
. Firs t Fueling
. Tan k an d dispense d fue l (Indolene ) a t approximatel y7 5 F
. Tan k empt y(fue l drai n level ) prio rt o fueling
. Fuelin g rat e of 1 5 gpm . 14. 5 gallon s dispense d throug h fou rshut-offs.Prematur e nozzl e shu t off s at 0.9,1. 3 an d 3. 3 gals
. Fue l gag e indicate d jus t ove r3/

4 ful l followin g fueling
. Secon d fueling
. Sam e condition s as firs t fueling
. 14. 7 gallon s dispense d throug h

fou rshut-offs
. Premature nozzl e shut-off s at 1.2,1.8 , 2. 5 an d 3. 4 gallons
. Fue l gag e indicate d jus t ove r3/ 4 ful l followin g fueling
. Third Fueling
. Sam e condition s as firs t fueling.15. 5 gallon s dispense d throug h

fou rshut-off s (mi n nozzl e flo wsettin g use d fo rtop-off)
. Premature nozzl e shu t off s a

t 1.1 , 2.4,10. 6 an d 11. 7 gallons
. Fue l gag e indicate d jus t unde rful l followin g fueling
. 10/25/90
. Tan k

at approximatel y65F , dispense d fue l a t approximatel y75F.Tan k emptya t star t offueling
. Fuelin g rat e of1 5 gpm . 14. 8 gallon s dispense d throug h thre e shut-offs
. Premature shut-offat 1. 3 gal
. Fue l gag e mi d waybetwee n 3/ 4 an d ful l followin g fueling
. Condition s a t prematur e shut-off : pressur e at caniste rinle t (max. ) approach d 3.5 " H20 , tan k pressure approx . 9 " H20 , fil l nec k pressur e ' approx12 " H20.
. 10/29/90
. Tan k

an d fue l at approximatel y75F
. Tan k empty
. Fuelin g rat e 1 5 gpm . 14. 6 gal
. throug h fou rshut-offs
. Premature shut-offa t 0.5 , 0.6 , 1. 5 gal
. Planne d caniste r disconnect actuall yoccurre d a t purg e line
. Pressure i n lin e t o caniste rfro m ven t valv e 2.7 5 to 3. 0 inc h water
. Retest #1
. Caniste rdisconnecte d fro m ven t valve
. Tan k empty
. Pressure i n lin e t o canister , 0. 3 inc h water
. Premature shut-offat 1. 5 gal
. Tan k an d fue l 75F
. Retes t #2
. Pressure i n lin e t o caniste r0. 5 inc h water
. 14. 7 ga l dispensed
. Retest#3
. Pressure i n lin e t o caniste r0. 4 inc h water
. 14. 9 ga l dispensed
. 10/30/90
. Caniste rpurge d fo rthre e hours (o n vehicle)
. 70 F fue l an d tank
. 1 5 gpm . Caniste r

connected
. Premature shut-offa t 1.0 , 2. 5 gal
. 14. 7 ga l dispensed
. Pressure i n lin e t o caniste r3. 5 inc h water
. Retest #1
. Condition s as above excep t fue l dispense d a t 1 0 gpm . 15. 4 ga l dispensed
. 2 inc h wate rpressure i n lin e t o canister
. Caniste rremove d fro m vehicle
. N o obviou s caus e fo rhighe rtha n expecte d bac k pressure seen . Caniste ropened
. Agai n n o obviou s caus e fo rbackpressur e seen . Caniste remptie d ofcharcoal , interio rinspected
. N o defect seen . Usin g charcoa l removed , caniste rrefille d usin g sam e jarrin g procedur e (plasti cmallet ) a s originall yuse d t o compac t charcoa l i n canister
. Al l ofth e charcoa l coul d not b e reinstalle d (handful l lef

t over . Doe s th e charcoa l expan d slightl ywhe n H C o rP.6 4


### H2 0 i s adsorbed)
. Caniste rplace d o n purge .

10/31/90
. Caniste rpurge d 4 hours offo fvehicle
. Reinstalle d o n vehicle
. Fuelin g at 1 5 gpm ,

tan k an d fue l at approximatel y70F
. Tan k empt yat star t o ffueling
. Premature shut-offa

t 1. 0 gal
. Pressure at caniste rinle t approximatel y3.5 " H20
. 14. 6 gal
. dispensed
. Retest #1
. Tan k

drained , 1. 5 ga l added
. Fue l gag e belowre d a t empty
. 1 5 gpm . 70 F bot h tan k an d fuel
. N o fuelin g problems
. 13. 2 gal
. dispense d throug h thre e nozzl e shut-offs
. Fue l gag e di d not reac h ful l mark
. Retes t #2
. Fuelin g startin g wit h 1. 5 gal
. fro m empt ydrai n . Sam e result s a s previou s fueling
. Retest#3
. Startin g wit h 2. 0 gal
. i n tan k an d temperature s a

t approximatel y75F
. Fue l gag e a

t botto m o fre d segmen t before fueling
. 12. 6 ga l dispense d throug h thre e shut-offs
.

Conclusion . Fue l dispensin g occur s withou t problem s whe n th e tan k i s not draine d belo wleve l tha t coul d occu ro n th e street . Usefu l fue l tan k

capacit yi n o n orde ro f1 3 t o 1 4 gallons .1 . --* < P.6 5 

# fdtf ? A\ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 

# JU N 2 6198 9 OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N



## MEMORANDU M SU3JECT :
FROM : TO : THRU : For d Tauru s wit hOnboar d System ; Hig hTemperatur e

Dat a Collectio n A



# f F . Pete r Hutchins , Mechanica l Enginee r A Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h•" " Loi s Platte , Actin g Chie f Tes t an d Evaluatio n Branc h / 

## - . Joh n F . Anderson , Senio r Projec t Manage r yr^Jh.Jh - _ Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc hww^i Cheste r J . France , Chie f Q/^LM^

## ^
- . ^ Standard s Developmen t and Suppor t Bramz n ^ ' Charle s L . Gray , Jr. , Directo r ~ y Emissio n Contro l Technolog yDivisio n SDS B wishe s t o evaluat e caniste r capacit ychange s a s th e onboar d equippe d vehicl e i s operate d ove r thre e consecutivel y performe d LA-4 s whe n th e fue l i n th e tan k i s a t hig h temperatures , and th e refuelin g emissio n contro l capabilitie s followin g thi s typ e o f operation . Pleas e perfor mth e testin g detaile d belo wan d collec t th e necessar ytes t data . 0 

## Loa d th e caniste r t o breakthroug hi n th e SHE D usin g 9RV P fue l and employin g th e procedure s fo r loadin g a refuelin g emission s canister . Weighth e caniste r (recor d weight ) followin g th e loading . Purg e 135+; 5 gram s fro mth e canister . Recor d purge d weight . ° Wit hth e caniste r disconnected , drai n th e fue l tan k an d fue l wit h6. 0 gals , 9RV P fuel . Collec t fue l sampl e an d measur e RV P and distillatio n curv e (mayb e omitte d i f Car l Scarbr o ca n provid e fo r th e batc ho f fue l bein g used) . Hea t th e fue l tan k unti l th e fue l reache s a temperatur e o f 94°+2°F .P.6 6

\s~**

0 

### Connec t th e canister .

° Perfor mthre e consecutiv e LA-4s . Measur e tailpip e emission s fo r eac hba g o f eac hLA-4 . Weig hcaniste r afte r eac hLA- 4 (idl e engin e whil e caniste r weigh t i s measured) . T o weig hcanister , clam p purg e lin e and lin e fro mtank t o canister , remov e canister , plu g caniste r inle t and purg e ports , weig hcanister , connec t canister , ope n purg e lin e an d lin e t o caniste r fromth e tank . Th e rat e a t whic hth e temperatur e o f th e fue l i n th e tank increase s durin g th e LA-4 s i s intende d t o simulat e temperatur e rise s see n durin g runnin g los s test s o f a stoc k . Mercur ySabl e a t ATL . Nomina l temperature s a t th e end o f eac hba g ar e a s follows : Initia l Temperatur e o f fue l i n tank afte r Fue l Firs t Firs t Secon d Secon d Thir d Thir d Temperatur e 505secs . LA- 4 505secs . LA- 4 505secs . LA- 4 94°+2° F 100°+2° F 112°+2° F 116°+2° F 121°+2° F 122°+2° F 124°F+2° F Durin g th e LA-4s , heatin g o f th e tank (us e magneticall y attache d hea t blanket ) wil l b e employe d t o achiev e th e necessar ytemperatures . ° Followin g performanc e o f th e thre e LA-4s , measur e refuelin g emission s usin g 9RV P fuel . Th e step s t o b e performe d her e are : remov e cap , drai n fue l tank , ad d 10 % (1. 5 gal. ) fuel , hea t t o 80+

_3°F , and perfor mrefuelin g emission s measurement . Monito r th e FI D trac e carefull y and terminat e fuelin g i f breakthroug hoccurs . Weig h caniste r afte r refuelin g emission s measurement . Th e preceedin g tes t sequenc e shoul d b e performe d thre e times . _ 

## Approval : / ^faxD*^Tjfa^fl//^Date : h "/ 6 

## Priority : LfA^t
7161 W; D20 9 

# folk.
198 8 LIGH T DUT YVEHICL E ANALYSI S | PROCESSED : 15:51:0 5 JU L 27 , 198 9 \

X>Z 030 VEHICL E I.D . A193XEX-091 5 VERSIO N 0 EVA P

N MFR .

REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y ALT . H.P . MET H CUR B DR V AXL E AXL E / IGNITIO N TIMIN G / PRE P DAT E WEIGH TWEIGH TGAUG E MEASUR E 0 1 # 2 RP M GEA R 07-26-8 9 EMPT Y PARTIC - ULATE S N REASO N FO R

CONFIRMATIO N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA GBYBA

G IDL E - % C O HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA KCOASTDOW

N TIM E RPM GEA RPERIO D ACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S -r / BARO DE

W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO XCV S "H GPOIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTORALDEHYDE S RG E 29.0 9 46. 7 96. 2 D 18. 6 48.6 1 0.889 6 27 C / DYNAMOMETE RTES T CONDITION S /

DYNO ACTUA L DYNO TIR E ODOMETE RSVSTE M TES T DAT E H

RSIT E I

W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S 07-27-8 9 1 3 D20 9 362 5 4. 0 45.0 0 9668. 4 N/ A BA G1 7.40 5 MILE S 11.91 7 K M 17265 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7446. 0 CU.FT . DILUTION FACTO R= 15.71 5 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O BA G2 7.42 2 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O BA G3 7.49 2 SIT E *A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 MILE S METE R

37. 6 42. 9 37. 5 4 2 . 1 11.94 4 CONC .

27.8 1 2 1 .2 7 0.83 2 178.7 8 K M 17304 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 MILE S METE R

1 1 . 9 46. 9 36. 0 32. 7 12.05 7 CONC .

8.6 9 23.2 7 0.79 6 135.7 3 K M 17468 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

10. 4 52. 8 36. 2 24 . 1 CONC .

7.5 9 26.2 2 0.80 1 98 . 1 3 BACKGROUN D

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 ROL L METE R

4. 4 0. 2 1 . 7 0. 0 REVS . BACKGROUN D RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 ROL L METE R

4. 2 0. 2 1 . 6 0. 0 REVS . BACKGROUN D RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

4. 0 0. 2 1 . 7 0. 0 SAMPL E

CONC . 3.2 0 0 . 1 0 0.03 5 0. 0
SAMPL E CONC . 3.0 5 0 . 1 0 0.03 3 0. 0
SAMPL E CONC . 2.9 1 0 . 1 0 0.03 5 0. 0 CORRECTE D

CONCENTRATION S 24.8 2 PP M 21.1 8 PP M 0.79 9 % 178.7 8 PP M SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 5.8 2 PP M 23.1 8 PP M 0.76 5 % 135.7 3 PP M

' SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 4.8 6 PP M 26.1 3 PP M 0.76 8 % 98.1 3 PP M MAS S EMISSION S

GMS . 3.0 2 7.6 0 3083.6 9 43.8 9 VMIX = 739 6 GMS/M I

0.40 7 1 .02 6 416.44 1 5.92 7 0 CU.FT . GMS/K M

0.25 3 0.63 8 258.76 4 3.68 3 DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 0.7 0 8.2 6 2932.7 7 33 . 1 0 VMIX = 737 5 GMS/M I

0.09 5 1.11 3 395.16 7 4.46 0 0 CU.FT . GMS/K M

0.05 9 0.69 1 245.54 6 2.77 1 DILUTIO N MAS S EMISSION S GMS . 0.5 8 9.2 8 2935.2 5 23.8 6 GMS/M I

0.07 8 1 .23 9 391.78 8 3 . 18 5 GMS/K M

0.04 9 0.77 0 243.44 6 1 .97 9 AUX . AUX . AUX .

FIELD l FIELD 2 COD E MP GKP L L/100K M 20. 8 8.8 3 11. 3 FACTO R= 16.52 9 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD l FIELD 2 COD E MP GKP L L/100K M 22. 0 9.3 7 10. 7
FACTO R= 16.51 1 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD l FIELD 2 COD E MP GKP L L/100K M 22. 3 9.5 0 10. 5 COMMENTS : O

N BOAR D VE H 3 LA-4 S BAC KT O BACKRE D TAURU S 3/1BGLA-4 S AT 9 5 DEGREE S F # 4 TH E FUE L ECONOM

V VALU E WA S CALCULATE D USIN GCONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T89-450 5198 8 LIGH T DUT YVEHICLE ANALYSI S PROCESSED : 11:07:4 1 JUL 27 , 198 9

MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . 03 0 A193XEX-091 5

CUR B PRE P DAT E WEIGH T 07-25-8 9 VERSIO N 0 MFR . ALT .

REP . RUN . RETES T H.P . EVA P INITIAL CHG . COD E ACH P MET H N Y DR V AXL E AXL E / IGNITION TIMING/ / WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E # 1 # 2 RP M GEA R EMPT Y PARTIC- REASON FOR ULATE S CONFIRMATION N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA GBYBA

G IDL E - % C O / HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA KCOASTDOW

N TIM E RP M GEA RPERIO DACTUAL ADJUSTE D 0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE

W AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO XCV S "H GPOIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO RALDEHYDE S RG E 29.2 5 45. 3 96. 7 D17. 4 45.8 2 0.879 4 27 C / DYNAMOMETE RTES T CONDITION S /

DYN O ACTUAL DYNO TIR E ODOMETE RSYSTEM TES T DAT E H

RSIT E IW

SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S 07-26-8 9 1 3 D20 9 362 5 4. 0 45.0 0 9646. 4 N/ A BA G1 7.42 3 MILE S 11.94 6 K M 17307 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUNDSAMPL E CORRECTE D SECS . VMIX = 7496. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N FACTOR= 15.90 4 RANG E METE RCONC . RANG E METER 1 4 4Z+A 3 1 .7 2 1 4 4. 7 1 5 l45.4 y22.5 2 1 5 0. 3 2 3 3TT 1 0.82 2 2 3 1. 8 1 8 40. 0 168.9 8 1 8 0. 0 CONC . CONCENTRATION S 3.4 2 28.5 2 PPM 0.1 5 22.3 8 PPM 0.03 7 0.78 8 * 0. 0 168.9 8 PPM GMS . 3.4 9 7.9 9 3059.6 2 4 1 .7 6 MAS S EMISSION S GMS/M I 0.47 0 1 .07 6 412 . 18 8 5.62 6 GMS/K

M 0.29 2 0.66 9 256.12 2 3.49 6 AUX .

FIELD l AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 2 1 . 0 KP L

8.9 2 L/100K

M 11. 2 BA G2 7.48 1 MILE S 12.03 9 K M 17442 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7447. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N FACTOR= 16.44 1 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHEM C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUNDSAMPL E CORRECTE D

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R 12. 2 50 . 1 36. 2 3 1 . 7 CONC .

8.9 1 24.8 7 0.80 1 131.2 8 RANG E

1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METER

4. 3 0. 3 1 . 7 0. 0 CONC . CONCENTRATION S

3.1 3 5.9 8 PPM 0.1 5 24.7 3 PPM 0.03 5 0.76 8 % 0. 0 131.2 8 PPM GMS . 0.7 3 8.7 7 2963.9 4 32.2 3 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.09 7 1 . 17 2 396.20 7 4.30 9 GMS/KM

0.06 0 0.72 9 246.19 2 2.67 7 AUX .

FIELD l AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22. 0 KP L

9.3 5 L/100K

M 10. 7 BA G3 7.50 8 MILE S 12.08 3 K M 17505 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7429. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N FACTOR= 16.53 6 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUNDSAMPL E CORRECTE D

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METER 10. 3 52. 9 36. 2 21. 2 CONC .

7.5 1 26.2 7 0.80 1 85.7 9 RANG E METE RCONC . CONCENTRATION S GMS .

1 4 4. 3 3.1 3 4.5 8 PPM 0.5 6 1 5 0. 3 0.1 5 26.1 3 PPM 9.2 4 2 3 1. 8 0.03 7 0.766 % 2949.2 7 1 8 0. 0 0. 0 85.7 9 PPM 21.0 1 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.07 4 1 .23 1 392.82 7 2.79 9 GMS/K

M 0.04 6 0.76 5 244.09 1 1 .73 9 AUX .

FIELD l AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22. 3 KP L

9.4 9 L/100K

M 10. 5 COMMENTS : TH E FUE L ECONOM

YVALU E WA S CALCULATE DUSINGCONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS . ON BOARDVE H 3 LA4 S BAC KT O BAC KRE DTAURU S 3/1BGLA-4 S A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 3

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-442 3

# r&'f

DYN O SITE:D20 9 TEST*-. * 89442 2 198 8 LIGH TDUT YVEHICL E ANALYSI S | PROCESSED : 1 1 :46 : 1 3 JU L 26 , 198 9

MFR . COD E VEHICL E I.D . 03 0 A193XEX-091 5 VERSIO N EVA P 0 N MFR .

REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC - REASO N FO R ULATE S CONFIRMATIO N N / TES T TYP E — EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA GB YBA G CUR B DR V

AXL E AXL E / PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E # 1 07-24-8 9 EMPT Y IGNITIO N TIMIN G/ # 2 RP M

GEA R IDL E - % C O HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA KCOASTDOW N TIM E RP M GEA RPERIO DACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 I AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W

AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M NO XCV S "H GPOIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO RALDEHYDE S RG E 29.3 0 / 46. 7 96. 4 D18. 5 48.2 6 0.888 3

— DYNAMOMETE RTES T CONDITION S / DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R TES T DAT E H RSIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) 07-25-8 9 1 3 D20 9 362 5 4. 0 45.0 0 9620. 8 BA G1 7.41 5 MILE S 11.93 4 K M 17289 . ROL L REVS . 27 C SYSTE M MILE S N/ A SECS . VMIX = 7533. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N FACTO R SIT E #A20 3 EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN DSAMPL E CORRECTE D 

## J+ K 

# M HC-FI D

NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O RANG E METE R

1 4 40. 6 1 5 42. 0 2 3 36. 9 1 8 35. 2 CONC . RANG E METE R

30.0 7 1 4 5. 2 20.8 2 1 5 0. 3 0.81 8 2 3 1. 7 146.9 8 1 8 0. 0 CONC . CONCENTRATION S GMS . 3.7 8 26.5 2 PP M 3.2 6 0.1 5 20.6 8 PP M 7.5 0 0.03 5 0.78 5 % 3063.5 4 0. 0 146.9 8 PP M 36.5 0 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.44 0 1.01 1 413.14 6 4.92 3 GMS/K M

0.27 3 0.62 8 256.71 7 3.05 9 AUX .

FIELD 1 16.04 0

AUX . AUX . FIELD 2 COD E MP G 2 1 . 0 KP L

8.9 3 L/IOOK M

11. 2
BA G2 7.49 3 MILE S 12.05 8 K M 17470 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7477. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N FACTO R 16.58 2 SIT E #A20 3 EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN DSAMPL E CORRECTE D HC-FI D ^ d. NOX-CHE M ..t f t l * C0 2 C O RANG E METE RCONC . RANG E METE R

1 4 12. 2 8.9 1 1 4 4. 8 1 5 47. 2 23.4 2 1 5 0. 2 2 3 35. 9 0.79 4 2 3 1. 7 1 8 32. 2 133.5 0 1 8 0. 0 CONC . CONCENTRATION S GMS . 3.4 9 5.6 3 PP M 0.6 9 0.1 0 23.3 3 PP M 8.3 9 0.03 5 0.76 1 % 2948 . 1 4 0. 0 133.5 0 PP M 32.9 1 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.09 2 1 . 12 0 393.46 4 4.39 2 GMS/K M

0.05 7 0.69 6 244.48 7 2.72 9 AUX .

FIELD l AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22 . 1 KP L

9.4 1 L/IOOK M

10. 6
BA G3 7.45 5 MILE S 11.99 8 K M 17383 . ROL L REVS . SECS . VMIX = 7457. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N FACTO R= 16.57 9 SIT E #A20 3 EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN DSAMPL E

RANG E METE R

* ^ HC-FI D

NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O 1 4

1 5 2 3 1 8 19 . 49 . 36 . 14 . CONC .

14.6 0 24.5 2 0.80 1 57.8 9 RANG E METE R

1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 CONC . 3.5 6 0 . 1 5 0.03 5 0. 0 CORRECTE D

CONCENTRATION S 1 1.2 5 PP M

1.3 7 24.3 8 PP M

8.7 5 0.76 8 % 2967.8 5 57.8 9 PP M

14.2 3 MAS S EMISSION S GMS . GMS/M I GMS/K M

0 . 16 4 0.11 4 1.17 3 0.72 9 398.07 6 247.35 3 1.90 9 1.18 6 AUX . FIELD 1 AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22 . 1 KP L

9.3 9 L/IOOK M

10. 7
COMMENTS : TAURU S RE D3/ 1 B GLA4 S 9 5 DEGREE S F # 2
TH E FUE L ECONOM YVALU E WA S CALCULATE DUSIN GCONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-442 2

# r&'f)

if- ' 

# \F
$V LfiDYN O SITE:D 2

MFR . 3 9 TES T /~89442, 1 

### 1
MFR . 198 8 LIGH T DUT YVEHICL E
ALT . REP . RUN . RETES T H.P . COD E VEHICL E I.D . VERSIO N EVA P INITIA L CHG . COD E 03 0 A193XEX-091 5 0 N PRE P DAT E 07-20-8 9 / AM

I BAR O DE W CUR B DR V AXL E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E EMPT Y J T CU T T E CT " munTT T AU C 31CN I ICD 1 LUNU111UN d AM B TEM P % RE L S.HU M "H GPOIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B 29.1 3 50. 2 94. 6 D22. 2 55.4 3 AXL E / MEASUR E # 1

NO X - IGNITIO N # 2

CV S FACTO RALDEHYDE S RG E 0.915 8 / DYNAMOMETE RTES T CONDITION S / TES T DAT E H R 07-21-8 9 1 4 BA G1 7.43 6 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D " A NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O BA G2 7.47 1 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D ^ NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O COMMENTS : 3 / DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE R

SIT E I W

SE T TWH P D20 9 362 5 4. 0 4 5 MILE S 11.96 7 K

M 17337 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E METE RCONC . 1 4 30. 0 22.1 2 1 5 48. 7 24.1 7 2 3 36. 2 0.80 1 1 8 41. 6 176.4 4 MILE S 12.02 3 K

M 17419 . EXHAUS T SAMPL E RANG E METE RCONC . 1 4 13. 7 10.0 1 1 5 51. 2 25.4 2 2 3 35. 9 0.79 4 1 8 34. 2 142.4 6 B GLA-4 S TAURU S A T 9 5 PS I (MI ) .0 0 9093. 3 ROL L REVS . BACKGROUN D RANG E METE R 1 4 4. 6 1 5 0. 8 2 3 1 . 8 1 8 0. 0 ROL L REVS . BACKGROUN D RANG E METE R 1 4 4. 6 1 5 0. 4 2 3 1. 7 I B 0. 0 DEGREE S F # 1 27 C

SYSTE M MILE S N/ A
SAMPL E CONC . 3.3 4 0.3 9 0.03 7 0. 0
SAMPL E CONC . 3.3 4 0.2 0 0.03 5 0. 0 ACH P MET H

Y TIMIN G/ / RP M GEA R

' SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 18.9 8 PP M 23.8 0 PP M 0.76 6 % 176.4 4 PP M

SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 6.8 7 PP M 25.2 3 PP M 0.76 1 % 142.4 6 PP M O N BOAR DRUNNIN GLOS E ANALYSI S | PROCESSED : 12:3 3 / :2 3 JU L 24 , 198 9

PARTIC - REASO N

FO REXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) ULAlt dLUNrlKMA11U N / N BA GB V XC O / IDL E IDL E HIG H SPEE DRP M GEA R

VMIX = 7468. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N

MAS S EMISSION S GMS . GMS/M I GMS/K M 2.3 1 0.31 1 0.19 3 8.8 1 1.18 5 0.73 7 2964.8 6 398.73 1 247.76 0 43.4 4 5.84 2 3.63 0 VMIX = 7415. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N

MAS S EMISSION S GMS . GMS/M I GMS/K M 0.8 3 0.11 1 0.06 9 9.2 8 1.24 2 0.77 2 2923.7 1 391.34 5 243.17 0 34.8 3 4.66 2 2.89 7 BA G SOA KCOASTDOW N TIM E PERIO DACTUA L ADJUSTE D 0 0. 0

FACTO R= 16.32 4 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD l FIELD 2 COD E MP GKP L L/IOOK M 21. 7 9.2 2 10. 8 FACTO R= 16.56 1 AUX . AUX . AUX . FIELD 1 FIELD 2 COD E MP GKP L L/IOOK M 22. 2 9.4 5 10. 6

TH E FUE L ECONOM

YVALU E WA S CALCULATE DUSIN GCONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS . 

## QyJUjikJl

uM 2
. .« top *

- ,^jJlLu-& CfSOF t&t?' •V

1853 7 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-442 1

# /-o3&

DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 198 8 LIGH T DUT YVEHICL E ANALYSI S | PROCESSED : 14:58:0 0 JU L 28 , 198 9

MFR . COD E 03 0 VEHICL E I.D . 1FABP52UXJG1108 9 VERSIO N 0 EVA P

N MFR .

REP . INITIA L RUN .

CHG . RETES T

COD E ACH P

Y ALT . H.P . MET H PARTIC ULATE S N REASO N

FO R CONFIRMATIO N / TES T TYP E - - EXPERIMENTA L (ECTD ) / TES T PROCEDUR E BA GB YBA G CUR B DRV

AXL E AXL E PRE P DAT E WEIGH T WEIGH T GAUG E MEASUR E 07-27-8 9 EMPT Y # 1 IGNITIO N TIMIN G/ U2 RP M

GEA R IDL E - % C O HIG H SPEE D IDL E SOA KCOASTDOW N TIM E RP M GEA RPERIO DACTUA L ADJUSTE D

0 0. 0 / AMBIEN T TES T CONDITION S / BAR O DE W

AM B TEM P %

RE L S.HUM

NO XCV S "H GPOIN T TEM P UNI T HU M GR/L B FACTO RALDEHYDE S RG E 29.1 8 51. 6 96. 6 D22. 0 58.3 2 0.927 3 27 C / DYNAMOMETE RTES T CONDITION S /

DYN O ACTUA L DYN O TIR E ODOMETE RSYSTE M TES T DAT E H RSIT E I W SE T TWH P PS I (MI ) MILE S 07-28-8 9 1 1 D20 9 3625 0 4. 0 45.0 0 30508. 8 N/ A BA G1 7.43 7 MILE S 11.96 9 K M 17340 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E BACKGROUN DSAMPL E

RANG E METE RCONC . RANG E METE R 1 4 34. 8 25.7 1 1 4 5. 3 1 5 40. 0 19.8 3 1 5 0. 2 2 3 36. 9 0.81 8 2 3 1. 8 1 8 37. 3 156.5 3 1 8 0. 0 SECS . VMIX = 7467. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N FACTO R= 16.03 0 CORRECTE D CONC . CONCENTRATION S 3.8 5 22.1 0 PP M 0.1 0 19.7 3 PP M 0.03 7 0.78 3 % 0. 0 156.5 3 PP M GMS . 2.6 9 7.4 0 3029.2 3 38.5 4 MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.36 2 0.99 5 407.31 6 5 . 18 2 GMS/K M

0.22 5 0.61 8 253.09 5 3.22 0 AUX .

FIELD l AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 2 1 . 3 KP L

9.0 5 L/IOOK M

1 1. 0
BA G2 7.46 4 MILE S 12.01 2 K M 17402 . ROL L REVS . SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 8 METE R

14. 2 32. 2 35 . 1 38. 4 CONC .

10.3 8 15.9 4 0.77 5 161.5 8 BACKGROUN DSAMPL E SECS . VMIX = 7422. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N FACTO R= 16.91 8 CORRECTE D RANG E METE RCONC . CONCENTRATION S GMS . 1 4 4. 7 3.4 2 7.1 7 PP M 0.8 7 1 5 0. 1 0.0 5 15.9 0 PP M 5.9 3 2 3 1. 8 0.03 7 0.74 0 % 2845.7 6 1 8 0. 0 0. 0 161.5 8 PP M 39.5 4MAS S EMISSION S

GMS/M I 0.11 6 0.79 4 381.28 4 5.29 8 GMS/K M

0.07 2 0.49 3 236.91 9 3 . 29 2 AUX .

FIELD l AUX . AUX .

FIELD 2 COD E MP G 22. 7 KP L

9.6 7 L/IOOK M

10. 3
BA G3 7.48 5 MILE S 12.04 5 K M 1745 1 SIT E #A20 3 HC-FI D NOX-CHE M C0 2 C O EXHAUS T SAMPL E

RANG E METE RCONC . 1 4 16. 8 12.3 0 1 5 32. 2 15.9 4 2 3 34. 8 0.76 8 1 8 45. 8 196.3 4 ROL L REVS . BACKGROUN DSAMPL E RANG E METE RCONC . 1 4 4. 6 3.3 4 1 5 0. 3 0.1 5 2 3 1. 8 0.03 7 1 8 0. 0 0. 0 SECS . CORRECTE D CONCENTRATION S 9.1 5 PP M 15.8 0 PP M 0.73 3 % 196.3 4 PP M VMIX = 7406. 0 CU.FT . DILUTIO N FACTO R MAS S EMISSION S AUX . GMS . GMS/M I GMS/K M FIELD l 1.1 1 0.14 8 0.09 2 5.8 8 0.78 5 0.48 8 MP G 2812.3 1 375.74 4 233.47 6 23. 0 47.9 4 6.40 5 3.98 0 16.99 2 AUX . AUX . FIELD 2 COD E KP L 9.7 6 L/IOOK M

10. 2 COMMENTS : AD D# 3 T O VI N TAURU S RE D 3-LA-4 S BAC KT O BAC KSTOC KVE H A T 9 5 DEGREE S F # 1 TH E FUE L ECONOM YVALU E WA S CALCULATE DUSIN GCONSTAN T FUE L PROPERTIE S FRO M PRE-198 8 REGULATIONS .

19 1 1 8 DYN O SITE:D20 9 TES T 89-453 3

# s ^SirsfaiuJ

^y f 

## i^cc_cf^> —

J hs^u ?£w*&asJ?L^t-n (-jA 

# J\ P.7 2



# ^%a^gkjL. :
/f t 2^( ? flwu/.



## fl£ j^^d jjary^

&u~C*£i JA/D-R4^L~. 

# Uiwifciu^&fktallk, / 9/ 

# ~ ^-r t - ^ 5 4o${'ipo«>* A-- ^



# f""j**f l^iw Ipwyin ^ - ^ W^&M? 

## £&&*$*• xAMa?~+& /



## - / ' 

# ^O ^^jA^L^d^^,^^^£ &^k/t&y <_ 

# IL\JiJfltrzjP.7 3



# /-3/-g f LJy^z&A uy^JJjp IAZ«MMA*+JL 

# * a

# 4/3Q- <-f

Q ^ ~ jd^lU lATCW^~A^g IA^6 € 

## ¥£ Q ^7X^_
_ 

# (%JZ i^t dfc. t±\ Lf\-t< ' a

# 3^00^. *P/- _LA
_ 

## # 2 , *-*-« / 3f^- g ^t^v . 

# _^_ii_|)
_

^ 5 L/4-- 4 ; 

# /^/zfc ^ ^ <ffi F

£j%tArUd*fi

£>P.7 4 

## Decembe r12,199 0 MEMORANDU M SUBJECT : Evaluatio n o fth e performanc e o fth e Onboar d

Tauru s usin g 1 ful l tan k ofcommercia l regula r unleade d fue l FROM : Josep h P
. Hurle y

Technician , HD T TO : Joh n A
. Anderso n

Senio rProject Mgr. , SDS B
Th e followin g i s m yevaluatio n ofth e performanc e of th e Onboar d Taurus
. Thi s appraisa l i s base d o n th e drivabilit ytes t performe d o n 12-11-9 0 an d 12-12-9 0 wit h th e ambien t temperature s rangin g fro m 4 5 deg
. F o n th e 11t h to a lo wof40. 8 deg
. F o n th e 12th
. Enclose d yo u wil l fin d record s ofth e dail yperformanc e logs , alon g wit h th e mileag e an d weathe rcondition s use d fo rthi s evaluation
. I t i s m yconclusio n tha t th e overal l performanc e ofth e Onboar d Tauru s wa s excellent , ther e wa s onl yon e noticeabl e startin g proble m o n th e 11t h prio rt o th e refuelin g ofth e vehicl e a t th e Amoc o statio n o n Plymout h Rd
. At thi s poin t th e ca rwa s stil l runnin g o n Indolen e tes t fuel
. Th e on e acceleratio n proble m tha t I ha d notice d whil e mergin g wit h expresswa ytraffi cwa s s o sligh t tha t yo u coul d hardl ynotic e it
. Ther e wa s a tota l o f30 8 accumulate d mile s drive n fo rthi s performanc e appraisal
. I foun d a remarkabl e differenc e i n th e performanc e betwee n th e firs t evaluatio n whic h wa s performe d o n Nov27t h & Nov28t h usin g ( 1 tan k

ful l o fIndolen e tes t fuel ) verse s usin g ( 1 ful l tan k ofregula runleade d commercia l fue l ) whic h wa s performe d o n De c11t h & De c12th
. I foun d Th e overal l performanc e wa s th e bes t usin g commercia l regula r unleade d fuel
. I fyo u hav e an yfurthe rquestion s regardin g th e enclose d materia l I ca n b e reache d a t ext
. 536
.P.7 5


## AMBIEN TTEMP
. 43. 2 DE G F
. TUESDA YDE C 11,199 0 TH E WEATHE R (SUNN YCLEA R ) ROAD S DR

Y MILEAG E START1034 2 EN D 1051 7 EVALUATIO N DAY 1 Prio rt o thi s evaluatio n th e Tauru s ha d bee n store d i n th e smal l soa k

are a wher e th e fue l tan k wa s essentiall y empty
. Previou s t o m ydrivin g th e vehicl e Car l fulle rha d move d th e Onboar d Tauru s fro m th e smal l soa k are a t o th e refuelin g bay
. Car l reporte d tha t th e Tauru s ha d starte d o n th e firs t cran k

bu t require d 5 second s ofcrankin g t o start
. I starte d th e ca ri n th e fuelin g ba ywher e i t wouldn' t star t afte rcrankin g fo r4 second s o n th e firs t try, bu t starte d o k o n th e secon d cran k

withi n 2 seconds
. Fro m th e E.P.A
. I drov e t o th e Amoc o statio n o n Plymout h R d t o refue l th e Tauru s usin g regula runleade d wit h ha d a n octan e ratin g o f87
. Durin g refuelin g th e carI didn' t experienc e an yrefuelin g problem s o rspi t backs , howeve rTh e fue l fil l nozzl e clicke d offa t 1 0 ga l an d I ha d t o nurs e i t th e res t ofth e wa yunti l i t reache d a tota l of11.16 5 GAL
. I foun d thi s strang e becaus e th e ga s tan k wa s essential yemptywit h th e gaug e o n th e das h readin g belo wth e re d mar k fro m empty befor e I starte d t o refue l it
. Afte rpayin g fo rth e fue l I the n starte d th e vehicl e whic h starte d wit h i n 2 second s o n th e firs t crank
. I the n too k a rout e fro m Plymout h Rd
. t o U S 2 3 north
. Gettin g ont o th e expresswa yI didn' t experienc e an ydifficultie s wit h th e acceleratio n th e performanc e wa s good
. I too k U S 2 3 nort h an d go t offa t M 5 9 exit
. I circle d aroun d an d go t bac k ont o U S 2 3 south
. Abou t 2 0 minute s int o th e driv e Whil e tryin g t o merg e wit h th e expresswa ytraffi cther e wa s a sligh t stumbl e upo n acceleration , i fI hadn' t bee n lookin g fo r i t I wouldn' t hav e notice d it
.P.7 6


## Afte rgettin g ont o th e expresswa yI the n too k U S 2 3 sout h t o th e Le e Rd
. exit , wher e I go t of fan d mad e anothe r circl e aroun d wher e I coul d essentiall yreenac t th e sam e se t ofcondition s whe n th e stumbl e wa s encountered
. Thi s tim e I couldn' t fin d an yacceleratio n problem s mergin g wit h th e expresswa ytraffic
. Whil e o n th e expresswa yI couldn' t fin d an yproblem s t o mention
. Drivin g m yrout e I the n go t offa t M 3 6 exi t an d heade d wes t wher e I coul d driv e th e countrysid e an d make a s man ykind s ofstop s an d start s tha t I fel t necessaryfo ra goo d evaluation
. Proceedin g alon g M 3 6 throug h Pinckne yan d the n t o Nort h Territoria l R d wher e I the n trave l wes t throug h th e countrysid e t o Manchester
. Alon g thi s rout e I wa s abl e t o make man ysto p an d start doin g a combinatio n bot h cit yan d expresswa ydriving
. Afte raccumulatin g aroun d 14 0 mile s I the n too k

I 9 4 t o U S 2 3 an d returne d t o An n Arbor
. I didn' t hav e an ydifficultie s o rproblem s othe rtha n th e on e tha t I ha d experience d a t th e beginnin g ofth e day
. Upo n arriva l a t th e E.P.A
. I parke d th e Tauru s outsid e o n th e wes t sid e o f th e buildin g wit h th e ga s gaug e readin g abou t th e 1/ 2 mark
.
TOTA L ACCUMULATE D MILE S 175P.7 7



## AMBIEN TTEMP
. 40
. DE G F
. WEDNESDA YDEC
. 12,199 0 TH E WEATHE R (SUNN YCLEAR ) ROAD S WER E DR

Y MILEAG E

STAR T1051 7 EN D 1065 0 EVALUATIO N DA Y2
I arrive d a t th e Onboar d Tauru s whic h wa s parke d outsid e alon g th e fenc e o n th e wes t sid e o fth e buildin g a t 8:3 0 am , fro m ther e I checke d th e weathe ran d th e temperatur e an d wrot e i t i n m ydail ylog
. Afte rI ha d compile d thi s informatio n I , the n starte d th e vehicl e whic h starte d o n th e firs t cran k i n 2 seconds
. Fro m th e E.P.A
. I too k Plymout h roa d t o U S 2 3 nort h to th e Brighto n exi t wher e I go t offan d drov e aroun d town
. I didn' t notic e an yacceleratio n proble m whil e gettin g ont o an d offfro m th e expressway , I di d a lo t ofstoppin g an d startin g whil e drivin g aroun d th e tow n wit h n o problems
. Returnin g t o U S 2 3 I the n heade d sout h t o th e Hambur g exi t wher e I the n drov e aroun d th e tow n an d surroundin g are a a t variou s spee d an d acceleration s wit h n o difficulties
. Afte r leavin g Hambur g I continue d m yrout e t o Nort h Territoria l R d wher e I repeate d m ytri p alon g th e countryendin g u p i n Manchester
. I the n drov e throug h th e tow n an d proceede d t o U S 1 2 eas t wher e I starte d m ytri p bac k t o U S 2 3 nort h toward s An n Arbor
. Afte rreturnin g a t th e E.P.A
. I the n parke d th e Tauru s outsid e alon g th e wes t fenc e , th e fue l gaug e wa s readin g emptyo n th e lowe ren d ofth e re d mark
. Th e performanc e ofth e Onboar d Tauru s wa s excellen t wit h n o problem s encountere d

MILEAG E ACCUMULATE D WAS (133 ) TH E TOTA L ACCUMULATE D MILEAG E WA S (308 )P.7 8 

## %
. . Decembe r27,199 0

MEMORANDU M SUBJECT : Evaluatio n o fth e performanc e o fth e Onboar d

Tauru s usin g 1 ful l tan k ofcommercia l premiu m unleade d fue l (9 3 octane ) FROM : Josep h P
. Hurle y

Technician , HD T TO : Joh n A
. Anderso n

Senio rProject Mgr. , SDS B Th e followin g i s m yevaluatio n o fth e performanc e of th e Onboar d Taurus
. Thi s appraisa l i s base d o n th e drivabilit ytes t performe d o n 12-20-9 0 an d 12-21-9 0 wit h th e ambien t temperature s rangin g fro m 4 6 deg
. F o n th e 20t h an d 5 0 deg
. F o n th e 21st
.
Enclose d yo u wil l fin d record s o fth e dail yperformanc e logs , alon g wit h th e mileag e an d weathe rcondition s use d fo rthi s evaluation
. I t i s m yconclusio n tha t th e overal l performanc e o fth e Onboar d Tauru s wa s superio rdurin g thi s evaluatio n usin g Amoc o premiu m unleade d 9 3 octan e fue l compare d t o th e tw o othe revaluation s on e don e o n 12-11-9 0 an d 12-12-9 0 usin g Amoc o regula runleade d fuel , an d th e firs t evaluatio n performe d o n 11-27-9 0 an d 11-28-9 0 usin g indolen e tes t fuel
. Durin g thi s evaluatio n I didn' t hav e an yproblem s o n th e col d start s o rth e drivabilit yo n roa d testing , th e acceleration s wer e smoot h wit h excellen t respons e tim e o n th e ga s peddle
. Whil e refuelin g th e vehicl e I didn' t notic e an yspi t back s o rprematur e shu t off
.
I fyo u hav e an yfurthe rquestion s regardin g th e enclose d materia l I ca n b e reache d a t ext
. 536
.P.7 9



## WEDNESDA

YDEC . 19,199 0

PRECONDITIONIN G O F TH E ONBOAR D TAURU S FO R TH E

DRIVABILIT

YEVALUATIO N USIN G (AMOC O 9 3 OCTAN E UNLEADE D FUEL) .

Th e Onboard Tauru s wa s parke d outsid e o n th e west sid e o f th e buildin g b

yth e refuelin g bay . I the n drove th e vehicl e int o th e larg e soa k

area , where I coul d hooku p th e validynes an d chart recorde rto be use d whil e I wa s refuelin g th e Taurus . Th e vehicl e starte d o n th e first cran k bu t it had abou t 4 second s la g time . Befor e I drov e th e Tauru s to th e Amoco statio n o n Plymout h r d to be fille d wit h 9 3 octan e unleade d fuel , I draine d a s muc h o fth e fue l ou t o

fth e tan k a s possible . I calle d Pet e Hutchin s an d reporte d that we were read yto chec k ou t th e instruments t o be use d whil e refuelin g th e vehicle . Whil e Pet e wa s walkin g ove rto th e soa k are a Vince Crowel l an d myselfused a cra b to mov e th e Tauru s into th e fuelin g ba yi n th e larg e soa k

area . Afte r Pete arrive d i n th e fuelin g ba yh e inspecte d th e instruments an d confirme d that th e instruments wer e workin g properly , we the n proceede d t o ad d 2. 5 ga l o

fcommercia l unleade d fue l int o th e empt

yfue l tan k

o n th e Taurus . Th e instruments wor k an d Pet e see n a goo d pressure trac e whil e fueling . Afte raddin g 2. 5 ga l o ffue l we decide d to pus h th e Tauru s into th e larg e soa k

are a overnight , I t wa s too lat e i n th e da yto drive s

o I decide d to fue l at th e Amoco statio n i n th e morning . Th e temperatur e woul d b e droppin g outsid e overnigh t s

o i t woul d b

e i n th e best interest t o leave th e vehicl e insid e an d kee p th e instrumen t warm. , b ydoin g thi s I though t tha t i t woul d hel p to kee p everythin g i n calibration .P.8 0

» 

## AMBIEN TTEMP
. 46 DE G F
. THURSDA YDE C 20,199 0 TH E WEATHE R (SUNNYCOOL ) ROAD S DRY
. MILEAG E STAR T10652 EN D 10877 EVALUATIO N DAY 1 Th e Tauru s ha d bee n lef t insid e overnigh t i n th e larg e soa k area , fro m ther e I starte d th e vehicl e an d drov e t o th e Amoco statio n o n Plymout h r d t o refuel
. I didn' t experienc e an d problem s wit h th e col d star t insid e th e building
. Upo n m yarriva l a t th e Amoco statio n o n Plymout h rd , I the n starte d hookin g u p th e instrument s use d t o recor d th e pressure s an d suppl ya trac e whil e refuelin g th e vehicle
. Vinc e crowel l ha d com e alon g wit h m e t o assis t i n th e refueling , we were goin g t o tim e th e fue l fil l rat e an d take 2 fue l nozzl e clic k

offs
. Th e firs t clic k

of fhappene d a t 11.23 2 gallons , n o spi t backs , th e secon d clic k of fat 11.65 1 n o spi t backs
. Fue l fil l take n 2. 7 ga l at th e 1 5 secon d mark
. Afte rth e secon d clic k of fat 11.65 1 ga l I trie d t o pu t a s muc h gasolin e a s possibl e int o th e tan k bu t i t woul d onl y take 12.19 1 gallons.Th e fue l gaug e o n th e das h wa s onl y readin g i n th e whit e whic h wa s jus t belowth e ful l mark
. Afte rleavin g th e Amoc o statio n I returne d t o th e E.P.A
. an d droppe d of

fVince , I the n too k

a rout e to U S 2 3 sout h where I drov e throug h Toled o Ohi o an d th e countr yside , agai n tryin g t o d o a combinatio n ofhighwa yan d citydriving
. Fro m Toled o I drov e alon g th e shore lin e t o por t ofToled o an d the n too k

7 5 nort h t o I 9 4 wes t toward s An n Arbor
. Th e drivabilit yi s goo d so fa rwit h n o problem s t o mention , it s 12:3 0 no wan d I wil l take lunc h at th e Mcdonald s restauran t i n Belleville
. Afte rlunc h I proceede d alon g m yrout e whic h le d throug h Ypsilant i I the n too k I9 4 wes t t o U S 2 3 nort h an d the n proceede d o n U S 2 3 an d got of fat Nort h Territoria l rd
. Fro m ther e I drov e west alon g th e countr ysid e unti l I reache d M52 sout h an d the n drov e throug h th e tow n of Chelse a where I got bac k o n I 9 4 east t o U S 2 3 nort h an d the n bac k

to An n Arbor
.P.8 1



## Afte rarrivin g bac k

at th e E.P.A
. I parke d th e Tauru s outsid e o n th e west sid e o fth e building
. Th e fue l gaug e i s readin g betwee n 1/

2 an d 1/

4 an d th e temperatur e i s 4 9 deg.f
. I hav

e drive n 22 5 mile s so fa rtoda yan d trie d t o mak

e a s man ystop s an d start s a s possibl e t o evaluat e th e performanc e ofth e Taurus.i t has bee n a goo d da ywit h n o drivabilit yo rperformanc e problem s to mention
. TOTA L MILE S ACCUMULATE D TODA YWA S (225 )P.8 2



### • \ 

## AMBIEN TTEMP
. 5 0 DE G F
. FRIDA YDEC
. 21,199 0 WEATHE R (FOGGY

) ROAD S (WE TWITH DEW) MILEAG E STAR T10877 FINIS H 10963
EVALUATIO N DA Y2

Wit h th e Tauru s parke d outsid e overnigh t thi s woul d giv e m e a goo d col d star t evaluation
. Afte rI starte d m ylo g I the n proceede d t o cran k th e vehicle , i t starte d o n th e firs t cran k withi n 2 seconds
. It s 8:0 8 an d I wil l start th e days evaluation , myrout e todaywil l consis t ofmainl yi n tow n drivin g becaus e th e weathe ri s ba d an d th e visibilit yi s poor . I left th e E.P.A
. an d proceede d o n m yrout e fro m Plymout h rd t o U S 2 3 south , afte rmergin g ont o th e expresswaywit h no problem s I got of fat th e Gedde s roa d exi t where I heade d east o n Gedde s r d an d the n proceede d nort h o n prospect rd throug h Ypsilanti
. M yrout e the n proceede d to U S 1 2 east where I drove throug h th e tow n o f wayn e an d the n mad e a tur n aroun d whic h pu t m e bac k onto th e wes t boun d lan e ofUS1 2 where I drove alon g th e countr y sid e throug h Salin e an d the n I mad e anothe rtur n aroun d o n U S 1 2 to U S 2 3 where I returne d to An n Arbor
. Toda yI s th e en d ofthi s par

t ofth e drivabilit yevaluatio n an d I haven' t notice d an yproblem s wit h th e performance ofth e vehicle
. Afte rI arrive d at th e E.P.A
. I parke d th e Onboard Tauru s insid e i n th e larg e soa k area . Th e ga s gaug e wa s readin g o n th e lowest en d o fempt ybelo wth e red
.

TH E TOTA L ACCUMULATE D MILEAG E WA S (86 )P.8 3



## NOVEMBE R 28,199 0 MEMORANDU M SUBJECT : T

o Evaluate th e performance o fth e Onboard Tauru s usin g 1 ful l tan k o fga s (Indolen e test fuel ) FROM : Josep h p . Hurle yJ ^
_ Technician , HDT^ TO : Joh n A . Anderso n _£, , v 3 

## Senio rProjec

t Mgr. , SDS B ^ a 

## ^ k 

## ^
Th e followin g i s m

yevaluatio n o

fth e performanc e o

f th e Onboar d Taurus . Th e drivabilitytes t performe d o n 11-27-9 0 an d 11-28-9 0 wit h th e ambien t temperature s rangin g fro m 6 8 de g fo n th e 27t h to a lo wo f4 5 de g fo n th e 28th , resulte d i n th e followin g appraisa l o fth e Ford' s Onboard system . Enclosed yo u wil l fin d record s o fth e dail y performanc e logs , an d th e mileag e before an d afte reac h o f th e days th e Onboard Tauru s was driven . It i s m yconclusio n tha

t th e overal l performance o fth e Onboar d Tauru s wa s good except fo rth e crankin g perio d problem s that I had experienced , an d th e tw o acceleratio n problem s that I had noticed o n th e takeoffs . I couldn' t fin d an yset patter n fo rth e acceleratio n problems , on e ha d happene d at rapi d acceleratio n an d th e othe rat moderat e acceleration . Ifyo u hav

e an yfurthe rquestion s regardin g th e enclose d materia l I ca n be reache d a t ext.536 .P.8 4 

## fi AMBIEN TTEMP
. 6 8 DE G F
. TUESDA YNO V 27,199 0 TH E WEATHE R WA

S RAINY MILEAG E

STAR T10059 EN D 1026

4 EVALUATIO N DAY 1 I starte d fro m th e soa k are a at th e E.P.A. , th e initia l crankin g o

fth e Tauru s wa s lon g wit h n o firin g o n th e firs t try
. Th e secon d firin g was hesitant , bu t i t fire d at abou t th e fou rsecon d mark
. Acceleratio n was goo d o n takeof fwit h n o stumbles^th e gas peq^le)wa s ver yresponsive
. I drov e a rout e t o Detroi t i n heav ytraffi cwit h n o problems
. I the n turne d aroun d an d heade d bac k to An n Arbo r tryin g t o vfe^

yth e speed s a t betwee n 6 0 an d 6 5 MPH
. Afte r lunc h I drov e US1 2 throug h Iris h hill s to Napoffa n Mic h an d the n throug h Jackson , I figure d tha t thi s woul d giv e m e a bette rfee l ofho

wth e Tauru s woul d perfor m unde rvariou s speed s an d route s bot h highwayan d cit ytraffic
. Afte r drivin g 19 7 mile s wit h th e ga s gaug e readin g betwee n 1/ 2 an d 1/ 4 I go t of

fth e Expresswa

yat th e Huro n s t exit , I the n starte d bac k

t o An n Arbor
. Thi s i s where I experience d th e firs t acceleratio n problem , tryin g t o merg e wit h Expresswaytraffi cI ha d t o accelerat e a t a rapi d rat e of speed , th e Tauru s didn' t respon d at al l whe n I presse d i t to th e floor.i n fact th e ca rstumble d badly , I ha d t o tr ythre e time s t o ge t i t t o accelerat e th e wayi t should , afte r finall ymergin g wit h traffi cI returne d t o th e E.P.A
.

MILEAG E ACCUMULATE D WA S 205P.8 5



## AMBIEN TTEMP
. 58 DE G F
. DROPPIN G T

O 45.DEGF
. TH E WEATHE R WA

S RAIN Y WEDNESDA

YNO V 28,199 0
MILEAG E STAR T10264 EN D 1034

2 EVALUATIO N DA Y2 I starte d fro m th e E.P.A. , th e initia l crankin g ofth e Tauru s was lon g wit h n o firin g o n th e firs t try
. Th e secon d firin g wa s norma l i n abou t two seconds , Acceleratio n wa s goo d o n takeoff
. Drivin g th e rura l rout e at abou t 2 0 minute s int o m y tri p an d 1 6 accumulate d mile s fo rth e day , I notice d upo n takin g of ffro m a sto p a

t a moderat e rat e o

facceleratio n a stumble
. O n th e secon d tr yi t performe d properl ywit h goo d response . Th e remainde rofDrivin g wa s aroun d th e An n Arbo rarea , bot h o n th e freeway , an d th e citystreets
. Th e ga s gaug e wa s readin g abou t 1/ 8 o fa tan k offue l so I returne d to th e E.P.A
. Othe rtha n th e on e stumbl e there were n o othe rproblem s to mentio n

MILEAG E ACCUMULATE D WA S (78) TH E TOTA L ACCUMULATE D MILEAG E WAS (283 )P.8 6

, *<i* ° Sr «& . 

### UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y AN N ARBOR
. MICHIGA N 4810 5 

## F'2-f c



# Wf5 !98

9 OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N



### MEMORANDU M

a t Hig h SUBJECT : Onboar d Tauru s

Temperatur e FROM : Pete r Hutchins , Mechanica l Enginee r

Standard s Developmen t and Suppor t Branc h TO : Charle s L . Gray , Jr. , Directo r

Emissio n Contro l Technolog yDivisio n THRU : Joh n F . Anderson , Senio r Projec t Manage r

Standard s Developmen t and Support^J^anc h Cheste r J . France , Chie f Standard s Developmen t a n Introductio n Th e testin g reporte d herei n wa s performe d becaus e o f concern s wit hrespec t t o th e runnin g los s contro l capabilit yo f th e onboar d system . I n curren t productio n fue l tank ventin g systems , th e flo wrat e o f fue l vapo r generate d i n th e tank t o th e caniste r and engin e i s limite d b ymean s o f flo wrestrictin g orifices . Th e fue l tank acts , therefore , a s a storag e vesse l fo r fue l vapo r whic hcoul d becom e runnin g losse s i f th e vapo r generatio n rat e exceed s th e capacit yo f th e engin e and caniste r t o utiliz e o r stor e th e vapor . I n th e onboar d syste mther e i s n o comparabl e restrictio n i n th e flo wo f thes e vapors . Th e concer n was , therefore , tha t th e vapo r generatio n rat e i n th e unpressurize d tank coul d excee d th e capacit yo f th e caniste r and engin e t o stor e and/o r utiliz e th e vapor , therebyleadin g t o runnin g losses . Testin g wa s performe d b yTE B a s requeste d i n a mem o date d Jun e 26 , 1989 . Sinc e th e la b i s no t configure d t o directl y measur e runnin g losses , monitorin g o f change s i n caniste r weigh t durin g th e test s wa s use d t o indicat e th e potentia l absenc e o r presenc e o f runnin g losses . I t wa s reasone d tha t reduction s i n caniste r weigh t durin g testin g woul d indicat e a n absenc e o f runnin g loses . I t wa s als o reasone d tha t an ygai nP.8 7



## i n caniste r weight , provide d breakthroughweigh t wa s no t exceeded , woul d als o indicat e a n absenc e o f running losses . Th e tes t sequenc e employed ; i.e. , thre e consecutiv e LA-4 s wit h highin-tan

k fue l temperature , wa s th e same a s tha t employe d i n evaluation s o f running losse s performe d fo r EPAb yATL . Exhaus t emission s durin g th e triplicat e LA- 4 tes t sequenc e an d refueling emission s following th e triplicat e LA- 4 operatio n wer e t o b e determined . Sinc e RVP control s ar e expecte d t o b e full yimplemente d befor e an yonboar d program , onl y9 RV P fue l wa s use d i n thes e tests . Th e temperatur e profil e o f th e fue l i n th e tan k wa s t o b e simila r t o tha t measure d o n a MercurySabl e during trac k test s i n highambien t temperature s an d during running los s testing a t AT L patterne d o n th e trac k data . Utilizin g a toleranc e band o f + 2°F , th e require d fue l temperature s during testing wer e t o b e a s follows : Temperatur e o f Fue l i n Tank (°F )

Afte r Afte r Afte r Afte r Afte r Afte r Firs t Firs t Secon d Secon

d Thir d Thir d Initia l 50 5 sec . LA- 4 50 5 sec . LA- 4 50 5 sec . LA- 4 9 4 10 0 11 2 11 6 12 1 12 2 12 4 Prio r t o initiatio n o f testing , th e canister * wa s temporaril ylocate d o n th e outsid e o f th e vehicl e a t rocke r level , jus t i n fron t o f th e righ t rea r wheel . Thi s locatio n facilitate d weighing o f th e caniste r during testing . Th e fue l tan k wa s equippe d wit ha heating blanket . I n additio n t o th e testing performe d o n th e onboar d equippe d Taurus , on e tes t sequenc e wa s performe d o n a stoc k Tauru s (caniste r weight s wer e no t measured) . Testin g o f th e stoc k Tauru s wa s performe d fo r purpose s o f compariso n wit hdat a fro mth e onboar d vehicl e an d similarl ycollecte d dat a fromATL . Tes t Sequenc e Th e sequenc e o f event s employe d i n th e testing o f th e vehicl e wa s a s follows . Th e caniste r wa s loade d t o breakthroughb

ydispensing 9 RVP fue l (Indolene ) int o th e vehicle' s fue l tank . Following loading , th e caniste r wa s weighe d an

d the n benc hpurge d unti l 135+ 5 gram s o f store d H C had bee n remove d fro mth e canister . Thi s purging wa s performe d t o simulat e stabilize d operating caniste r conditions . Th e vehicl e wa s fuele d t o 4 0 percen t tank volum e ( 6 gallons ) wit h Indolen e a t approximatel y55°F , th e caniste r connected , an d th e vehicl e place d i n th e tes t cell . Heating o f th e fue l wa s 3. 5 L fille d wit hWestvac o charcoa l simila r t o tha t use d b yFor d i n productio n canisters .P.8 8



## performe d unti l th e temperatur e o f th e fue l i n th e tan k reache d th e require d 94+2° F starting temperature . Th e caniste r wa s agai n weighe d an

d reconnected . Vehicl e operatio n o n th e thre e consecutiv e LA- 4 drive s wa s initiate d an d heating o f th e fue l tan k wa s performe d a s required . Following th e completio n o f eac hLA-4 , th e caniste r wa s remove d fro mth e vehicl e an d weighed . During th e weighing operation , th e vehicl e plumbin g t o an d fro mth e caniste r an d th e caniste r inle t an d purg e connection s wer e capped . Th e vehicl e engin e wa s allowe d t o idl e during th e weighing s whic hrequire d approximatel y1 1/ 2 minute s each . Exhaus t emission s wer e measure d fo r eac hLA- 4 sequence . Becaus e o f facilit ylimitation s i n th e numbe r o f ba g sample s whic hcoul d b e collecte d an d analyze d o n an ongoing basis , exhaus t emission s wer e sample d an d analyze d fo r eac hLA-4 . Thi s procedur e gav e thre e sample s an d resulting dat a set s pe r tes t rathe r tha n th e si x sample s (tw o pe r LA-4 ) whic hwoul d hav e bee n collecte d had th e equipmen t bee n available . Following completio n o f th e thir d LA-4 , refueling emission s wer e t o b e measure d a s specifie d i n th e refueling NPRM . During th e firs t performanc e o f th e tes t sequence , th e temperatur e o f th e tes t cel l wa s maintaine d a t th e norma l setting fo r tha t cel l o f approximatel y7 0 t o 75°F . I t wa s observe d during thi s testing tha t vehicl e engin e temperatur e wa s running highe r tha n norma l an d tha t th e vehicl e cooling fa n wa s operating continuously . I n subsequen t test s (thos e from whic htes t dat a ar e reported ) on e additiona l Hartze l fan wa s employe d t o achiev e engin e operating temperature s simila r t o thos e see n o n th e road an d t o avoi d continuou s operatio n o f th e vehicl e fan . I n addition , during th e firs t performanc e o f th e tes t sequenc e liqui d fue l wa s foun d i n th e vapo r lin e leading t o th e canister . Th e amoun t o f liqui d presen t wa s greate r a t th e en d o f th e secon

d LA- 4 tha n a t th e en d o f th e firs t LA-4 . Thi s observatio n lea d t o th e conclusio n tha t vapo r condensatio n wa s occurring i n th e lin e a s vapor s fro mth e heate d fue l tank encountere d th e coole r lin e t o th e canister . Therefore , i n subsequen t tests , th e temperatur e o f th e tes t cel l wa s raise d t o approximatel y95°F . On e additiona l tes t sequence , from whic hdat a ar e no t reported , wa s performe d t o establis hth e tan k heating rate s require d a t th e elevate d cel l temperatur e an d t o confir

mtha t vapo r condensatio n di d no t occu r i n th e lin e t o th e caniste r an d th e adequac yo f engin e cooling . Th e result s obtaine d fro m four tests * using th e triplicat e LA- 4 tes t sequenc e ar e show n i n Tabl e 1 . Two othe r test s wer e initiate d bu t no t complete d becaus e o f vehicl e failure s during thes e tests . Vehicl e failure s wer e exhibite d a s stalling o f th e engine . Engin e restar t wa s achieve d almos t immediatel yo n th e firs t o f thes e sequence s bu t wa s delaye d significantl yo n th e secon d sequence . Th e caus e o f th e failure s wa s trace d t o damag e t o th e in-tan

k fue l pum

p du e t o significan t contaminatio n i n th e tank . Fue l pum p replacemen t correcte d th e problem .P.8 9



## Result s fro

m th e stoc k Tauru s teste d a t MVE L an d thos e obtaine d fro

ma stoc k Sabl e teste d a t AT L o n a triplicat e LA- 4 tes t sequenc e a t approximatel y95° F ar e show n i n Tabl e 2 . Conclusion s Th e ke yconclusion s draw n fro mthi s testing were : (1 ) tha t caniste r weigh t decrease d continuousl ythroughou t th e tes t sequence , indicating tha t vehicl e purg e wa s adequat e t o contro l generate d vapor s an d running losse s ha d no t occurre d fro mth e onboar d system

(se e Tabl e l fo r caniste r weights) , (2 ) tha t vehicl e exhaus t emission s wer e no t adversel yaffecte d b yth e onboard system

(compariso n o f Table s 1 an d 2) , an

d (3 ) tha t th e vehicl e maintaine d refueling contro l capabilit yafte r thes e hightemperatur e operating conditions . Attachment s 7447 W

### Tabl e 1 Tes t Result s - Onboar d Tauru s P.9 0



### Tes t Numbe r (Date ) Caniste r Wt. :

- afte r breakthroug h(g )

- afte r benc hpurg e (g )

- afte r fue l heating (g ) Initia l tan

k tem p (°F ) Tan k tem p @ 1s t 50 5 sec . (°F ) Tan k tem p @ en d o f # 1 LA- 4 (°F ) 1 (7-25-89 ) 2 (7-26-89 ) 3 (7-27-89 ) 4 (8-2-89 ) 4089. 4 3964. 2
9 6 9 9 11 0 4112. 4

3974. 6 4005. 1 9 3 9 8 10 9 4092. 1

3948. 5 3989. 9 9 4 9 9 11 0 4100. 9

3964. 9 3995. 5 9 5 9 9 10 9 Tailpip e emissions , # 1 LA- 4 HC (g/mile ) C O (g/mile ) NOx (g/mile ) C0 2 

### (g/mile ) Caniste r Wt . afte r # 1 LA- 4 (g ) Tan k tem p @ 2n d 50 5 sec . (F° ) Tan k tem p @ en d o f # 2 LA- 4 (F° ) Tailpip e emissions , 1 2 LA- 4 HC (g/mile ) C O (g/mile ) NOx (g/mile ) C0 2 

### (g/mile ) Caniste r Wt . afte r # 2 LA- 4 (g ) Tan k tem p @ 3r d 50 5 sec . (°F ) Tan k tem p @ en d o f # 3 LA- 4 (°F ) Tailpip e emissions , # 3 LA- 4 HC (g/mile ) C O (g/mile ) NOx (g/mile ) C0 2 

### (g/mile ) Caniste r Wt . afte r # 3 LA- 4 (g ) Caniste r Wt . afte r refueling (g ) Refueling emission s (g/gal ) 0.4 4 4.9 2 1.0 1 413.1 5 3963. 4 11 7 12 2
0.0 9 4.3 9 1.1 2 393.4 6 3956. 4 12 3 12 5
0.1 8 1.9 1 1.1 7 398.0 8 3951. 1 0.4 7

5.6 3 1.0 8 412.1 9 3969. 3 11 6 12 1
0.1 0 4.3 1 1.1 7 396.2 1 3958. 4 12 3 12 5
0.0 7 2.8 0 1.2 3 392.8 3 3950. 1 0.4 1

5.9 3 1.0 3 416.4 4 3955. 5 11 7 12 1
0.1 0 4.4 6 1.1 1 395.1 7 3948. 4 12 4 12 5
0.0 8 3.1 9 1.2 4 391.7 9 3940. 6 0.5 5

6.1 2 1.0 0 413.1 7 3959. 3 11 5 12 2
0.1 0 4.0 5 1.0 9 391.6 6 3950. 4 12 3 12 5
0.0 9 3.3 7 1.1 6 395.6 5 3941. 9 4053. 2 0.0 4P.9 1



## Tabl e 2 Tes t Result s - Stoc k Vehicle s

Initia l tank tem

p (°F ) Tan k tem p @ 1s t 50 5 sec . (°F ) Tan k tem p @ en d o f # 1 LA- 4 (°F ) Tailpip e emissions , ttl LA- 4 H C (g/mile ) C O (g/mile ) NO x (g/mile ) CO 2 (g/mile ) Tank tem

p @ 2n d 50 5 sec . (F° ) Tank tem

p @ en d o f # 2 LA- 4 (F° ) Tailpip e emissions , # 2 LA- 4 H C (g/mile ) C O (g/mile ) NO x (g/mile ) CO 2 (g/mile ) Tank tem

p @ 3rd 50 5 sec . (°F ) Tank tem

p @ en d o f # 3 LA- 4 (°F ) Tailpip e emissions , # 3 LA- 4 H C (g/mile ) C O (g/mile ) NO x (g/mile ) CO 2 (g/mile ) Tauru s (@EPA ) 9 5 9 9 10 8 0.3 6 5.1 8 1.0 0 407.3 2 11 4 12 1 0.1 2 5.3 0 0.7 9 381.2 8 12 4 12 6 0.1 5 6.4 1 0.7 9 375.7 4 Sabl e

( @ ATL ) 9 5 NR * N R 0.4 0 6.8 1 1.0 8 482. 1 11 3 11 5 0.1 0 4.1 3 0.9 6 428. 0 N R 12 5 0.1 2 4.5 8 0.8 8 444. 9
N R = No t reported .S i0 sr<v 

# ys s \mfi* / 

### UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y AN N ARBOR
. MICHIGA N 4810 5 P.9 2 r~€r-£7*T~ 

# Fo9.n

OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N 

# SEP 2 2 198 9
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT : Evaluatio n o f Ho t Ambien t Testin g fo r th e Onboar d

Tauru s
FROM : Josep hP . Hurley , Technicia n yS^ ^^ i^^^- s .

Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor^JBranc h* 

## TO : John F . Anderson , Senio r Projec t Manage r

Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h
THRU : Thoma s M . Baines , Heavy-Dut yTestin g Coordinato r

Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h 

# <YvB^ Th e followin g i s m yevaluatio n o f th e performanc e o f th e onboar d Tauru s durin g th e ho t ambien t testing . Attache d yo u wil l fin

d record s o f th e dail ytemperatur e logs , and bot hth e officia l temperature s an d th e temperature s take n a t th e EP A befor e an

d afte r eac ho f th e day s tha t th e onboar d Tauru s wa s driven . I hav e als o enclose d th e officia l temperature s fo r th e whol e testin g period . I t i s m

yconclusio n tha t th e overal l performanc e o f th e onboar d Tauru s wa s excellent . Afte r drivin g severa l differen t route s a t differen t speeds , I coul d no t find an yperformanc e faults . Bot hth e col d an d ho t start s wer e goo d wit hnorma l crankin g periods . Attachment sP.9 3



## 8/22/8 9 HO TAMBIEN TTES

T Usin g th e onboar

d Tauru s wit h th e caniste r modifications , we are tryin g t o gathe rinformatio n o n th e effect s tha t ho t ambien t temperature s have o n th e driveabilityan d performance o fthi s vehicle
. 

## THE TESTIN

GPROCEDURE S WER E PERFORME DA S FOLLOW S (1) The fuel in the vehicle was drained to 1/4 of a tank. (2) The modified

canister was purged for 1 hour. (3) The car was then parked outside

of the fueling area where the battery cables were disconnected. Removing

the battery cables and then reconnecting

them would delete all of the learned driving memory

in the onboard Taurus computer. This

would allow the Taurus to be able to learn new information

and store it in its learning memory. Thus, the

vehicle would begin testing in a standard

baseline

condition. (4 ) The high and low temperatures

were recorded

for each day during the testing period. This

will also included

the days where the weather

wasn't sufficient

enough for our testing standard. (5) We will Drive the onboard

Taurus until we have driven out one tank of commercial

fuel obtained

from a local gas station.P.9 4



## WED-8/23/8 9 AMBIEN TTEMP
. Star t Finis h 7 8 8 0

EVALUATIO N HO TAMBIEN TTEST

DAY 1 Afte rreconnectin g th e batter ycable s o n th e Onboar d Taurus , an d checkin g th e ambien t temperature , I the n starte d th e Taurus , whic h fire d of fi n abou t 2 seconds
. The n I proceede d t o th e Amoc o statio n o n Washtena w wher e I fille d th e ga s tan k ful l ofcommercia l unleade d fuel
. Afte rleavin g th e Amoc o statio n wit h th e firs t ful l tan k of fuel , I drov e a combinatio n o fdifferen t speeds
. Th e rout e consiste d o fbot h highwa yan d cit ydriving
. Th e overal l driveabilit yo fth e Tauru s wa s excellent , wit h n o stumble s o n takeoff s o rdurin g an yofth e speed s obtaine d thi s day
. TOTA L MILEAG E ACCUMULATE D TODA YWA S (74 )P.9 5



## THU R -8/24/8 9 AMBIEN TTEMP
. Start
. Finish
. 7 8 7 8 EVALUATIO N HOTAMBIEN TTES T

DA Y2
It s 12:00 , th e su n i s shinin g an d th e temperatur e i s 7 8 degrees ; I decide d tha t i t wa s a goo d da yt o pu t a lo t ofmileag e o n th e Taurus
. Th e initia l firin g ofth e Tauru s wa s excellen t withi n 2 seconds
. I drov e a lo t ofdifferen t route s today , mos t ofwhic h include d expresswa ydriving
. Th e overal l performanc e o f th e onboar d Tauru s wa s excellent , wit h n o problems
. TOTA L MILEAG E ACCUMULATE D TODA YWA S (164 )P.9 6


## TIES-8/29/8 9 AMBIEN TTEMP
. Start
. Finish
. 7 8 7 9

EVALUATIO N HOTAMBIEN TTES T

DA Y3
Thi s wasn' t th e bes t ofday s t o us e fo rou rtesting , bu t I wante d t o us e u p th e remainin g fue l i n th e Tauru s a s soo n a s possible
. At 12:0 0 I notice d a brea k i n th e weathe rs o I decide d t o driv e th e 5 0 mile s o rs o t o us e th e remainde ro ffue l u p i n th e onboar d Taurus
. Agai n I didn' t encounte ran yabnorma l problem s wit h th e crankin g periods , neithe rth e cold , no rth e hot
. Bot h ofwhic h fire d offwithi n 2 t o 3 seconds
. TOTA L MILEAG E ACCUMULATE D TODAYWA S ( 46) .P.9 7



## HO TAMBIEN TTESTONBOAR D TAURU S TEMPERATUR E RECORD S OFFICIALAMBIENT

TEMPERATURES

DURING

THE DAYS THAT THE ONBOARD

TAURUS

WAS BEING USED, WHICH INCLUDES

WEEKENDS

AND BAD WEATHER

DAYS. HIGHES TTEMP . LOWESTTEMP . DAY . NIGHT . DE G F. DE G F. TU E 8/22/8 9 WE D 8/23/8 9 THU R 8/24/8 9 FR I 8/25/8 9 SA T8/26/8 9 SU N 8/27/8 9 MO N 8/28/8 9 TU E 8/29/8 9 WE D 8/30/8 9 THU R 8/31/8 9 FR I 9/1/8 9 SA T9/2/8 9 SU N 9/3/8 9 MO N 9/4/8 9 TU E 9/5/8 9 8 1

7 7 7 6 7 6 7 9 8 3 7 9 8 0 7 7 8 3 7 6 7 3 7 3 7 3 8 0 6 1 6 0 5 3 5 1 5 3 6 2 6 3 5 8 5 5 5 5 6 0 5 3 5 2 5 2 6 2P.9 8



## DRIVEABILITY TES T ONBOARD TAURU S
DATE : ^ ' Aa / 9* 1 DRIVER' S NAME : v)0Sg:P H ? • Hmlue V

AMBIENT TEMP COL D START : 6 1 ^& > f 

## ( a I *< * P
TIME OUT : TIME IN :
GAS TAN K GAUG E READIN

G START : END : MILEAG E O

NVEHICL E START : °\ 7 1 2 . END ;
TOTA L MILEAG E ACCUMULATED :

COMMENT S ONDRIVEABILITY O F VEHICLE : ij Dfcurygdi
. tK t

-pu p \r > -th e Tau>.o S ^

o Xf Tan g (^"PvJ^c. ^ -th* . CO.m.ct-e ^ -PfM . I U . H£t?6a r Dist? 6 anecke d ~*ht . ba-V-y-gf>\ / OU*>n>q,VvY



## GENERAL DESCRIPTIONO F ROUT E TAKEN :

ROA D CONDITION S WEATHE RCONDITIONS : (VA-.£Cft S \""PftCT- W/

SO^IIM V 

## \I' W> DP.9 9



## DRIVEABILITY TES T ONBOARD TAURU S vOvl D 

### DATE : %/33/ff i DRIVER' S NAME : ^O^-Pt A~ ? l^Ul^ f



## AMBIENT TEMP COL D START : 

## -7 7 bO TIME OUT : !' • 2. 0 TIME IN : 3' . 3 O
GA S TAN K GAUG E READIN

G START : 10- ^ QrX END : W l
MILEAG E O

NVEHICL E START : R] ^ END : ^"7% ^
TOTA L MILEAG E ACCUMULATED : 1 M

COMMENT S O

NDRIVEABILITY O F VEHICLE : i.~ifecDAn*.<LA~€

d~Vh ^ tcu^e ^ On"itA

g \au^o s
~?u<- l -£)0UJ > H H ^ll n? Q Jf C fa.Q 

## Cuici c o-t e t0 

## . a 7 

## ^ GENERAL DESCRIPTIONO F ROUT E TAKEN : TW^oOV K

fOac X"V o ~b»o5 > ^ec- V VP<M J

### So^V^ -V

qmn nei,y

g 

### , uQdt

- -V

o SeMe^u. ^ *0<*A .SOvrH

v-VT > X-^v tVjQCi.1- . Gvr\o- Ko A >P^-Ur\ b ^hd C -U^au s V » Vn-j n



## ROA D CONDITIONS : \^RV WEATHE RCONDITIONS : Q\)£gCftS T"PpvRT ^ ^ONIM V 

### f frWi D 

### £IQfiftrv ?P. 1



### DRIVEABILIT Y TES T ONBOAR D TAURU S 

## TH\)ittP« W DATE : <jIPA jg S DRIVER' S NAME : -^QS£?*- \? HuttU^ V STAR Tfu\v\iv i KvGv Av^o^ o 

## AMBIENT TEMP COL D START : 7 2 7 S -?6 > 5 3

TIM E OUT : I-2'. 0 0 TIME IN : M' . \S " GA S TAN K GAUG E READIN

G START : -9o\ \ END : RrVujegmk £ ) ^ MILEAG E O

NVEHICL E START: ' ^" 7 3 7 END : S^S l
TOTAL MILEAG E ACCUMULATED : > (o ^

COMMENT S ONDRIVEABILITY O F VEHICLE : Goo dM

O ~£>hObW^S , \dnh- WW(\u-<

Ldn ^ pv-ObV*<n i VO*TV\-Vv w do\ dS,Ta*-Y f

t-V -gyre dO^'IV I 

### fibo.i- v a . second s "TVi<
. Co\ 4 S>Ta.^~r e uvm i ~VV\

g Sg-n g *

> o T^^ Q ^V.<V^ ^



## GENERAL DESCRIPTIONO F ROUT E TAKEN : "3 1 ~T"oofc, VJ

5 - a. 3 Saott ^ ~\- Q vrnclmcya n<*yj * U7^~t * -\ 0 "B^QQ^/ nrmc ^ V-i(S>-V WtH^ao'i.V i -AatVLiaf t mavCK

~Vlr>-er v \PQCVC -\o "X-Q K r_AS ^ -\ Q l^ ntVbCu
. ~TV\^. ^ino^^gx Atxtd c T O -VK€ . ( f • "?* • ^ •



### ROA D CONDITIONS : fiooT) X> ^ WEATHE RCONDITIONS : Jni^fr W\Ao \P. 2



## DRIVEABILIT Y TES T ONBOAR D TAURU S iu^sOft ^ DATE : %>

| a° t Ig 6 

## ! DRIVER' S NAME : ^Qs£? H THO^^ V \-\v<it \ UOO J 

## 7<*. l ?^- o s o S S AMBIEN T TEM P COL D START :
TIM E OUT : ya.' - 4 S TIM E IN : £L\ \$
GA S TAN K GAUG E READIN GSTART : CWf-ft . , X END : ^gtoOg-g n V*%Y*
MILEAG E O NVEHICL E START : 9^.5 1 END : ^^ 7 TOTA L MILEAG E ACCUMULATED : 1 C g

COMMENT S O NDRIVEABILIT Y O F VEHICLE : ttX9\Y9.<\\ ^" 0 01 4 4,o'^ c -hrv.< . 3
- 5< C COVc \ C o O P T^p-9o^"-vcy-<AC. Q

GENERA L DESCRIPTIO NO F ROUT E TAKEN :

^ "TfooY v-D\y|mo^-VVy>C><u,( S "V d -^Qoc l v-oac \ gxts- V -^ > •p-osy' ^ r e>*<3 , 50Jt- K~t o \THt(LV \ O-i x-t o d'Cdi^S' C Voa(Ji i ^Q^t- , ulgn.-* - boi)-V K6* \ V>eL\<?om e



## ROA D CONDITIONS : T^R ^
WEATHE R CONDITIONS : tl^^S T f Vlp^n ^ '"vfrdrL V S^N"^ .P. 3 

# Augus tflEH

SU N MO N TU E WE D TH U FR I SA T



# 6

1 3

2 0

2 7 L< i u j 

### fe» 

### H>4 H •s- 3 

# 7

1 4

2 1

2 8
UJOU J 

### 4> 3 

### HIG H 7 T 

# 1
8

1 5

2 2 L o <^ » fc>\ 

## \-W-\ S i 

## 2 9 use * LOu » 

### 5 S HiC K 

## S o 

# 2

9

1 6

2 3 ove< 

# 4 L o o u (o O 

### \A«^ H 

# n 

# 3 0 uo« o 

## s s H»ft U 7 7 

# 3

1 0

1 7

2 4 w« i U o u o 

### S 3 

### Mi& U T ( » 

# 3 1 t O w



### - V-M6 H ^ " 

# 4

1 1

1 8

2 5 UOo J S I HiC H 

### •Ma 

# 5

1 2

1 9

2 6 U o w 5 3 

### Hi^ w "? c lP. 4 

# uc^JiciiikJid i jnfl n

SU N MO N TU E WE

D TH U FRI SA

T



# 3 Ulu J 

### 52
. Hifcr t ? 3 

# 1 0

1 7
2 4 4

U O w * 

### a * l-U& W ? 3 

# 1 1

1 8
2 5 5

VOU J 

### t>* H'fcW r o 

# 1 2

1 9

2 6 6

UOu 3 

### Hvfcl A 

# 1 3

2 0
27 7 UOo J



### \-UG> H 

# 1 4

2 1

2 8 1

UOt J


### 7fc 

# 8 Uou J 

### H'S H 

# 1 5

2 2

2 9 2

U O C O 

## 5 3 vu»r t 73 

# 9

1 6

2 3
3 0P. 5 

# f JO \ 

# w Foig

\ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y 3 rj AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 

## AU G 2 4 I98 9 OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N 

### MEMORANDUM SUBJECT :

FROM : 

## TO :

THRU : Gasoline , Diese l an d Methano l Refuelin g Emission s Dat a Collectio n
F . Pete r Hutchins , Mechanica l Enginee r \ l Standard s Developmen t and Suppor t Branc h** v 

### Charle s L . Gray , Jr. , Directo r Emissio n Contro l Technolog yDivisio n John F . Anderson , Senio r Projec t Manage r Standard s Developmen t and Suppor t Branc h Cheste r J . France , Chi e Standard s Developmen t Branc h
TE B ha s collecte d tes t dat a o n uncontrolle d refuelin g emission s fo r SDS B comparin g gasoline , methano l and diesel . Dat a wer e collecte d usin g vehicle s an d a stand-alon e fue l tank . Th e objectiv e o f th e testin g wa s th e measuremen t o f fue l vapo r emanatin g from th e fille r nec k durin g fuelin g events . Dat a associate d wit hfue l spill s durin g refuelin g are , therefore , no t included . I n som e case s th e dat a sheet s raise d question s wit hrespec t t o th e accurac yo f som e o f th e results . Thes e dat a ar e als o no t show . Thi s mem o summarize s th e tes t dat a whic hwer e collecte d b y E & D and provide s som e comment s o n th e data . Dat a collecte d b yRT P usin g M8 5 and MlO O fuel s ar e summarize d a t th e en d o f th e memo . Difference s i n tes t procedure s ar e noted . Fo r gasolin e (Tabl e 1) , comparison s betwee n th e measure d emissio n rate s and th e calculate d value s show s a genera l agreemen t betwee n th e measure d an d calculate d results . Agreemen t betwee n measure d and calculate d value s appear s t o b e somewha t bette r fo r th e FI D dat a tha n fo r th e HFI D data . Difference s appea r t o exis t betwee n dat a collected , fromth eP. 6



## vehicl e an

d dat a collecte d fro mth e stand-alon e fue l tank . Measure d result s fro mth e vehicl e tende d t o b e highe r tha n th e calculate d values , whil e th e result s fro m th e tan

k test s tende d t o b e lower . Th e averag e refueling emission s measuremen t fo r diese l fue l (Tabl e 2 ) wa s approximatel y0.0 4 grams/gallon ; i.e. , abou t 4 0 percen t o f th e refueling emissio n standard whic hha s bee n propose d for gasolin e fuele d vehicles . Estimate s o f diese l refueling emission s base d o n th e displacemen t o f equilibriu m compositio n vapor s fro mth e fue l tan

k showe d a rang e o f fro m 0.00 5 t o 0.03 7 gram/gallo n depending o n th e assumption s use d i n th e calculation s (Attachmen t 1-Not e fro mDav e Bartus) . Becaus e o f th e similarit ybetwee n th e measure d an d uppe r rang e o f th e estimate d values , i t appear s probabl e tha t th e measure d value s can b e viewe d a s representativ e o f diese l refueling emissions . Inspectio n o f th e tes t result s fo r MlO O (Tabl e 3 ) show s bot hhightest-to-tes t variabilit yan d variabilit ybetwee n measuremen t procedur e (i.e. , FI D vs . HFI D vs . Bubbler) . Exclusiv e o f on e FI D dat a poin t an d on e HFI D dat a poin t wher e th e result s wer e veryhigh(dat a sheet s di d no t provid e possibl e explanatio n fo r thes e highvalues) , th e mea n result s o f al l o f th e measurements , i.e. , vehicl e an d tan k tes t result s b yFID , HFID , an

d bubble r combined , i s a refueling emissio n rat e o f 0.5 7 gra mmethanol/gallo n methanol . Corresponding averag e tan

k an d dispense d fue l temperature s wer e 80.4 ° an d 81.5° F respectively . Th e measure d refueling emissio n rate s ar e lowe r tha n th e rat e projecte d fro mequilibriu

mvapo r displacemen t calculation s a t 80°F , i.e. , 1.9 9 gram/gallo n (Attachmen t 2-Not e fro m Dav e Bartus) . Ther e was , however , goo d agreemen t betwee n th e calculate d RVP valu e fo r MlO O (4.7 1 psi ) an d th e measure d valu e (4. 6 psi) . I n th e cas e o f th e M-8 5 fue l test s (Tabl e 4 ) th e bubble r result s (i.e. , methanol ) showlarg e variabilit ybetwee n tests . Larg e variabilit ybetwee n tes t result s wa s als o exhibite d i n th e FI D an

d HFI D (i.e. , HC ) results . Review , o f th e tes t record s yielde d n o explanatio n fo r th e highvariability . Th e mea n resul t fo r th e methano l fractio n wa s 0.8 4 gra m methanol/gallo n M8 5 dispensed . O n th e basi s o f tota l refueling emissions ; i.e . H C plu s methanol , th e averag e valu e obtaine d wa s 2. 2 gram/gallo n M85 . Th e measure d RVP o f th e tes t fue l wa s 12.3 . Th e measure d result s wer e lowe r tha n th e calculationa l projection s (4.2 8 t o 5.2 3 gram/gallo n M8 5 - Attachmen t 2 ) develope d fro

mequilibriu

m vapo r displacemen t calculation s a t 80°F . Th e equilibriu mvapo r displacemen t calculation s wer e base d o n M8 5 blend s using 9. 1 RVP gasolin e an d 12. 0 gasoline . Th e calculate d RVP o f th e resulting M8 5 simulate d fuel s wer e 8.0 3 an d 9.3 7 respectively . Refueling emission s dat a collecte d b yRT P an

d reporte d i n an APCApape r (Attachmen t 3 ) ar e summarize d i n Tabl e 5 . Difference s whic hcoul d b e identifie d betwee n tes t procedure s employe d b

yE & D an

d thos e employe d b

yRT P ar e a s follows :P. 7



## • Tan

k an d dispense d fue l temperatures : E & D employe d approximatel y8 0 ° F for bot htan k an d dispense d fue l temperatures . RT P employe d 88° F fo r dispense d fue l an d 78° , 88 ° an d 98° F tan

k temperatures . • Dispense d fue l volumes : E & D fuele d fro m 10 % t o 95 % tan k volume . RT P fuele d fro m17 % t o 95 % tank volume . • RT P stabilize d fue l tan k temperatur e i n th e SHE D wit hth e ga s ca

p i n place . Following sealing o f th e SHE D an

d initia l measuremen t o f backgroun d levels , th e ga s ca

p wa s remove d (som e outgassing wit hca p remove d mayhav e occurre d an d bee n measure d a s refueling emissions) . • RT P reporte d measuremen t o f backgroun d H C level s i n th e SHE D prio r t o refueling . RT P doe s not , however , repor t measuring Methano l backgroun d level s prio r t o refueling . • Following refuelings , RT P remove d th e fue l nozzl e fro mth e fille r nec k an d replace d ga s cap . • RT P employe d a mixing perio d i n th e SHE D o f approximatel y1 5 minute s prio r t o measuremen t o f concentration s following refuelings . I n th e report , RT P attribute d th e caus e o f th e hydrocarbon s measure d during fueling s wit hMlO O t o residua l hydrocarbon s i n th e fue l car t fro mprio r fueling s wit hM85 . Attachment s 1 , 2 , S 3P. 8


### Tabl e 1 Refueling Emission s - Gasolin e ( E & D Data )

Sourc e Vehicl e (Old s Vehicl e ( " Vehicl e ( " Vehicl e ( " Vehicl e ( "

Tan k (Fro m

01 < Tan k ( Tan k ( Tan k ( Tan k ( Tan k ( Tan k ( Tan k ( Tan k ( 1



## as ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) RV P PSI ) 9. 3 9. 3 9. 3 9. 3 9. 3

9. 3 9. 3 9. 3 9. 3 9. 3 11. 5 11. 5 11. 5 11. 5 Tan k Tem p 

### (°F ) 81. 0 81. 0 78. 6 80. 1 79. 2

79. 2 79. 7 80. 4 79. 9 80. 1 81. 0 79. 9 79. 2 79. 7 Dis p

Fue l 

### <°F ) 80. 2 81. 3 80. 1 81. 7 81. 3

81. 1 80. 1 81. 1 79. 9 81. 3 81. 3 81. 3 81. 9 81. 0 Refuel i

FI D Measuremen t 4.3 7

X s X s

X s
X s -

- 6.7 3 6.8 6 6.8 0 0.0 9 5.9 9 1.4 0

5.4 1 5.4 3 5.5 6 5.4 4 5.5 7 6.8 1 7.2 6 7.5 7 6.9 5 5.9 3 0.7 7 6.2 2 0.9 0 (2)* * (3)* *

(7)* * (9)* * n g Emission s (

HFI D Measuremen t
7.8 7 5.5 0 6.5 2 6.9 3 6.7 3 0.2 9 6.7 1 0.9 8

5.3 7 5.4 0 5.5 0 5.3 4 5.5 7 6.6 5 7.2 2

-

- 5.8 6 0.7 5

- (2)* * (4)* *

(7)* * g/gal ) Calcula t 5.6 2 5.8 2 5.8 2 5.9 8 5.9 9 5.9 9 0.0 1 5.8 5 0.1 5

5.9 5 5.7 2 5.8 4 5.6 6 5.9 0 6.8 8 6.9 9 7.1 6 6.9 5 6.1 3 0.5 6 6.3 4 0.6 3 ed *

(2)* * (5)* *

(7)* * (9)* *

* * 

### Calculate d from : Emission s (grams/gal ) = -5.90 9 - 0.0949(^t ) + 0.0884(T D 

### ) + 0.485(RVP) . Number s i n ( ) denote s numbe r o f test s included in mea n an d standard deviation . The smalle r set s reflec t test s wher e bot hFI D an d HFI D dat a wer e collected .P. 9 

## Tabl e 2 Refueling Emission s - Diese l # 2 ( E & D data )

Tank Dis p Refueling Emission s (q/qal ) Tem p Fue l FI D HFI D Sourc e (°F ) (°F ) Measuremen t Measuremen t Vehicl e (Chevrolet ) 81. 1 80. 0 0.03 1 0.03 4 Vehicl e ( " ) 81. 0 79. 9 0.03 9 0.04 0 Vehicl e ( " ) 81. 7 81. 0 0.03 4 0.03 2 Vehicl e ( " ) 82. 4 81. 3 0.05 2 0.05 7 x 0.03 9 0.04 1 s 0.00 9 0.01 1P.1 0



### Tabl e 3 Refueling Emission s - MlOO ( E & D Data )

Sourc e Vehicl e (Ford ) Vehicl e ( " ) Vehicl e ( " ) Vehicl e ( " )

Tan k (Fro mOlds ) Tan k ( " ) Tan k

Tem p (°F ) 81. 0 80. 4 79. 7 81. 1

80. 2 80. 8 Dis p

Fue l 

### (°F ) 81. 0 81. 9 80. 4 82. 0

81. 1 82. 0 Refuel i

FI D Measurement*

X s X s

X s 2.2 8 0.3 5 0.5 8 0.5 3 0.9 4 0.9 0 0.4 9 0.1 2 0.5 6 0.5 5 0.5 6 0.0 1 (4)* * (3)* * n q M e Emission s HFI D asurement * 2.2 0 0.3 9 0.6 6 0.6 2 0.9 7 0.8 3 0.5 6 0.1 5 0.6 2 0.6 3 0.6 3 0.0 1 (4)* * (3)* * (g/gal )

Bubble r 0.7 8 0.5 2 0.5 8 0.5 4 0.6 1 0.1 2 0.5 5 0.0 3 0.5 4 0.8 8 0.7 1 0.2 4 (4)* *
(3)* *



### Using FI D an

d HFI D respons e facto r t o methano l o f 0.75 . Number s i n ( ) denote s numbe r o f test s included i n mean an d standard deviation . The smalle r set s reflect s omissio n o f tes t wher e FI D an d HFI D result s wer e significantl yhighe r than value s fro mothe r tests .Tabl e 4 p.1 1

Refuelin g Emission s - M85 * ( E & D Data )

Sourc e Vehicl e (Ford ) Vehicl e (Ford ) Vehicl e (Ford ) Vehicl e (Ford ) Vehicl e (Ford ) Tan k

Temp 

### (°F ) 81. 1 80. 1 80. 2 80. 8 80. 2 Dis p

Fue l <°F ) 81. 9 81. 1 81. 9 80. 4 80. 4 Me :

X s FI D isurement* ' 1.1 2 2.7 0 0.8 3 1.7 2
1.59** * 0.8 3 Refuelin g Emission s (g/gal )

HFI D
• Measurement* *

1.1 1 2.6 8 0.7 9 1.6 4 3.2 9 1.56** * 0.8 3 Bubble r

0.4 5 1.0 7 0.4 7 0.5 7 1.6 6 0.8 4 0.5 2 Tota l

1.56-1.5 7 3.75-3.7 7 1.26-1.3 0 2.21-2.2 9 4.9 5 2.20-2.23** *

. 1.1 1

* M-8 5 use d i n testin g cam e fro ma n on-han d stoc k o f fue l purchase d a s M-85 . RV P tes t o f th e M-8 5 stoc k gav e a tes t resul t o f 12. 3 psi . * * H C onl y- Respons e o f FI D and HFI D t o methano l remove d i n calculations . ** * Include s onl ytest s wher e bot hFI D and HFI D result s wer e obtained .P.1 2 

## Tabl e 5 Refueling Emission s - M8 5 an d MlOO (RT P data )

Fue l
M85 * M8 5 M8 5 MlOO* * MlO O MlOO Tank

Temp . (°F ) 7 8 8 8 9 8 7 8 8 8 9 8 Disp . Temp . (°F ) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Methano l

(g/gal ) 0.7 2 0.7 3 0.7 3 0.8 0 0.7 9 0.6 6 Refuelinq

H C (g/gal ) 2.6 3 2.5 2 2.1 5 0.2 7 0.1 1 0.1 1 Emission s

Tota l refueling emission s (q/qal ) 3.3 5 3.2 5 2.8 8 1.0 6 0.8 9 0.7 7

* * 

## Measure d RV

P o f M8 5 tes t fue l wa s 8. 5 ps i Measure d RVP o f MlO O tes t fue l wa s 4. 6 ps i
5648 WP.1 3


### To : Pete r Hutchin s ~ From : Dav e Bartu s •Date : Decembe r 11 , 198 7 Re : Diese l Re-fuelin g Evaporativ e Emission s CC : Ric kRykowsk i Preliminary

calculation s o f re-fuelin g evaporativ e emission s -fro m diese l vehicle s hav e bee ncarrie dou t t o provid e a nindependen t chec ko

nexperimenta l re-fuelin g emission s measurements . Result s o- f thes e calculation s rang e -fro m 0.00 5 gram s HC/gallo no- f refueling •fue l t o 0.03 7 g/ga l -fo r re-fuelin

g at 8 0 F . Bot ho- f thes e estimate s ar e o- f the same orde r o f magnitud e o r les s tha nexperimenta l refueling los s measurement s o f 0.0 5 g/gal , leadin g t o the conclusio ntha t curren t experimenta l dat a do no t contai ngros s errors . Emission s wer e calculate db y assuming the primary sourc e o f hydrocarbon s i s the tan kvapo r displace db y the additio no f refueling fuel . Knowledg e o f the displace dvapo r volum e an dthe concentratio no f hydrocarbon s i nthe displace dvapo r allow s calculatio no f tota l hydrocarbo nlos s throug happlicatio no f the idea l ga s la

w an da mas s balanc e aroun dthe fue l tank.CI ] The concentratio no f hydrocarbon s i nthe tan

kvapo r spac e canb e calculate dfro

m the liqui dfue l vapo r pressure , whic hi nturnwa s estimate dusing tw o differen t methods . Th e firs t i s base do na n analytica l distillatio no f a fuel , whil e the secon di s base do

n availabl e Rei dvapo r pressur e data . Fo r distillation-base dvapo r pressur e calculations , dat a wer e obtaine dfro

m a fue l analysi s tha t include s a nAST M D-B 6 atmospheri c distillation.C2 3 Dat a value s wer e takena s the averag e o f the five analyse s reporte dfor SwR I Fue l Cod e EM-678-F , CR C VE- 1 Fue l No . 5 . Al l value s usedfo r calculation s ar e withi nlimit s specifie dfo r diese l emission s certificatio nfue l i n4 0 CFR 86.113-8 7 fo r typ e 2- Ddiese l fuel , excep t for the D-8 6 initia l boiling point . Fo r thi s analysis , a reporte dvalu e o f 33 6 F wa s used , compare dt o a specifie dlowe r limi t o f 34 0 F . Detail s o f vapo r pressur e calculation s ar e attached . A fue l vapo r pressur e o f 0.13 1 m m H g wa s obtaine dfro m thes e calculations , correspondin g t o refueling losse s o f 0.00 5 g/gal . The calculate drefueling los s o f .00 5 g/gal . an dthe associate d vapo r pressur e 0.1 3 m m H g appea r t o b e somewha t lowe r tha n experimenta l measurement s sugges t indicating the needt o compar e calculate dvapo r pressur e result s wit hexperimenta l data . A s a chec ko

nthes e results , a nindependen t vapo r estimat e wa s obtaine d fro m a diese l fue l Rei dvapo r pressur e tes t result.C5D . Starting fro m the assumptio ntha t the tru e vapo r pressur e o f a diese l fue l at 10 0 F i s equa l t o the measure dRei dvapo r pressure , a conversio n to vapo r pressur e at 8 0 F wa s mad e using Figur e K.J , attached . The assumptiontha t tru e an dRei dvapo r pressure s are equa l i s necessary

sinc e availabl e correlation s relating thes e tw o measure s o f vapo r pressur e wer e develope d-fo r gasolines , an

dd o no t appl y

t o les s volatil e diese l fuels . Thi s approac hgav e a vapo r pressur e estimat e o f 0.9 1 m m Hg , corresponding to re-fuelin g losse s o f 0.03 7 9/9*1 - The calculation s describe dabove accoun t onl y for hydrocarbon sP.1 4 

### emitte dthroughdisplacemen t o f tan kvapor , bu t do no t accoun t for an y additiona l vaporizatio no f th e refueling fue l a s it i s introduce dint o the fue l tank . Thi s additiona l vaporizatio ni s a complexproces s involving non-equilibriu m hea t an

dmas s transfer , s o tha t modellin g o f it i s beyondthe scop e o f thi s preliminar y study . Althoug hth e actua l amoun t o f vaporizatio ni s mos t likel y muchless , a

nuppe r boundcanb e estimate db y assuming tha t the refueling fue l vaporize s t o a nexten t equa l t o tha t experience db y th e initia l tan

kfue l befor e refueling . Unde r thi s limiting assumption , refueling losse s woul dbe twic e the valu e calculate d above , o r 0.0 1 g/ga l o r 0.07 4 g/gal , respectively , for th e tw o vapo r pressur e estimates .
References : 1 ) Wade , D.T. , "Factor s Influencing Vehicl e Evaporativ e Emissions, " SAE Pape r 670126 . 2 ) Monthl y

Progres s Repor t No . 19 , 1/1/87-1/31/87 , o nCR C Projec t VE-1 , "Investigaio no f the Effect s o f Fue l Compositio nan d Injectionan

dCombustio nSyste m Typ e o

nHeavy-Dut y

Diese l Exhaus e Emissions, " Southwes t Researc hInstitut e Projec t No . 08-8673 . (Februar

y 10 , 1987) . 3 ) Hougen , O.A. , an dWatson , K.M. , "Chemica l Proces s Principle s Charts, " Char t 3 , Wiley

(1946) . 4 ) AP I Technica l Dat a Book- Petroleu m Refining , Fourt hEdition . America nPetroleu

m Institute , 1983 . 5 ) Alternativ e Fuel s Committe e o f the Engin e Manufacture s Association , " A

Technica l Assessmen t o f Alcoho l Fuels, " SAE Technica l Pape r 82026 1 (Februar y 22-26 , 1982) .P.1 5 

### Estimatio no f Fue l Vapo r Pressur e fo r Calculatio no f Refuelin g Emission s Th e followin g procedur e ca nb e use dfo r estimatio no f liqui dhydrocarbo n vapo r pressur e fro m analyse s tha t includ e a natmospheri c distillatio ntest . Dat a value s used.fo r calculation s ar e attached . 1 ) Plo t th e fue l AST M D-8 6 distillatio ncurve , an ddivid e th e curv e int o a numbe r o f small-volum e increments . Thes e wer e selecte d a s 0- 5 vol* , 5-10% , 10-20% , etc. , a s showni nth e attache dplot . 2 ) Determin e th e volume-averag e boilin g poin t o f eac hcut . Fo r example , th e 0- 5 vol % cu t wa s foun dt o hav e a boilin g poin t o f 36 6 F . Th e remainin g value s ar e showninth e attache d calculatio ntable . 3 ) Usin g Proceedur e 2B1. 1 a s define di nRef . 3 , calculat e th e tota l liqui dvolume-averag e boilin g poin t o f th e tota l liquid , define d as : vab p= (T1 0 + T3 0 f T5 0 • T7 0 + T90 ) / 5 wher e th e T10 , T30 , etc . value s ar e th e distillatio n temperature s a t th e correspondin g volum e percents . Als o calculat e th e AST M D-8 6 10-90 % slope . Value s obtaine dfo r thes e quantite s ar e 509. 2 F an d2.38 , respecively . 4 ) Calculat e th e mea naverag e boilin g poin t (MeABP ) usin g Proceedur e 281.1 . Th e value s obtaine di s 496. 7 F . 5 ) Calculat e th e Watso nK-factor , define da s

K= (MeABP)»#(l/3 ) / S pG r 60/60 F From th e reporte dAP I gravit y o f 34.7 , a specifi c gravit y o f .851 4 i s found , resultin g ina K-facto r o f 11.57 . 6 ) From

th e boilin g poin t o f eac hcu t foun di n2 ) abov e an dth e K-facto r fro

m 5) , findth e molecula r weigh t an dAP I gravit y o f eac hcu t usin g Figur e K. 4 fro m Ref . 4 (attached) . Thes e value s ar e tabulate di nth e attache dcalculatio ntable , wit hth e cu t densit y

reporte da s specifi c gravity . I nobtainin g thes e values , i t wa s assume dtha t th e K-facto r o f eac hcu t wa s equa l t o tha t o f th e tota l liqui da s calculate di n5) . Thi s assumptio ni s probabl y inaccurate , bu t lac ko f additiona l dat a preclude s furthe r refinement . 7 ) Fo r eac hcut , calculat e the correspondin g mass , numbe r o f mole s an dmol e fraction . Fo r thes e calculations , th e mas s basi s i s unimportant , s o th e mas s or ' eac hfractio ni s calculate dfro m (Vol * o f eac hcut ) (3 pGr ) 8 ) Calculat e th e vapo r pressur e o f eac hcu t foun din2) , usin g Proceedur e 5A1.1 3 fro m Ref . 3 . Fo r thes e calculations , the K-facto r o f eac hcu t wa s assume dequa l t o tha t o f th e tota l liquid , a s calculate din5) . Th e commen t give nin6 ) regardin g thi s assumptio nals o applie s here .P.1 6 

### 9 ) Calculat e th e overal l liqui dvapo r pressur e b y summin g th e produc t o f th e vapo r pressur e an dcorrespondin g mol e fractio no f eac hcut , usin g value s foun di n7 ) an d8) . Th e resultin g valu e i s .1307 8 m

m Hg . 10 ) Calculat e th e overal l molecula r weigh t b y dividin g th e tota l mas s b y th e tota l moles , usin g value s fro m 7) . Th e valu e obtaine di s 198.67 .P.1 7 

### Fue l Characterizatio n SwR I Fue l Cod e EM-678- F CR C VE- 1 Fue l No . 5
AST M D-8 6 Distillatio n(Averag e Values) , F : Vol % Temp , F 

### IB P 5 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 9 5 E P
AP I Gravity :

34. 7 

### 33 6

38 8 41 2 44 0 46 7 49 0 51 2 53 2 55 3 57 4 60 2 62 6 64 5P.1 8

tfmaf 12-1 M M M * i n US A

Millimwr - ' , 3 \S~ V " 

### -a . 

### - i "3 b 

### '"V " \- ^ O - . ^ TP.1 9

IO O 20 0 30 0 40 0 SO O 60 0 70 0 80 0 90 0 100 0 Boilin g point , * F Fig . K.4 . Properties o fpetroleu m fractions .P.2 0

. c

CHARACTERISTI C
CHEMISTR Y Aoeroa . Soeefi c Gravity Boilin g Pomt 

### •c Ne t Heatin g Valu a (Mass ) STU/l o MJ/i g Na t Heatin g Valu e (Volume ! BTU/ge J MJ/ I Hea t o fVaooriatio n 

### u/i g Vaoo rRresaur

e 9 100" f oa t kf» a Octan e Numoa r Researd t Mete r Catan a Numoe r Stoieniemetri e A/ * Re M Vaoo rflammabrtrr

yLawns . % b yvolum e Viscosit y< ? 40" C Cannooiaa Centistoie s Appearanc e Vaoo rToxicit

y

Not * 1 . Ne

t aooiicaoia . Not * 2 . May6 e th e sam e a a Note XValue s no

t puotiine e



### Source : TABL E II
. 1

PROPERTIE S O F ALCOHOL S AN D OTHE R FUEL S

GASOLIN E MIXTUR E 0 " HYDROCARBON S .7 2 - .7 5
8S-43 7 30-22 3 18.70 0 41 3 117.00 0 3 2 17 0 40 0 9 - 1 3 62-9 0 9 1 - 10 0 62-9 2 Below1 5 14 6 6 - 8 5 6 Caienes a t o lig m amoe rcolo r M nea rat e irritant .

getetma . o rad d 1. 5 L



### Alternativ e Association , SA E Techn i NO . 1 DIESE L FUE L MIXTUR E O F MYOROCARBON S 3 2
360-53 0 190-28 0 18.50 0 4 3 126.00 0 35. 3 23 0 60 0 .0 5 .3 4 Note 1 40-6 0 14. 6 6 •6. 5 1 4 5 1.7 5 Colorles s : Q hgnt amoe rcolo r Extrem e concentran o NO . 2 DIESE L PUE L MIXTUR E O F

. HYDROCARBON S 

### a s
37 5 - 63 0 210 - 32 5 18.40 0 4 3 130.00 0 36 6 23 0 60 0 .0 4 .2 7 Not e 1 40-6 0 1 4 6

. 6 - 6. 5 2.4 1 2.7 9 Lign t amoe reoio r
n cause s narcosis .

y2 numoers dependin g o n blendin g gract K



### Fuel s Ccmmitte e o fth e " ATechnica l Assessme n ca l Pape r320261 , Februar y

-9 - ETHANO L C,H,0 H .7 9
17 3 78. 3 11.60 0 2 7 76.00 0 21. 3 39 0 90 0 2. 3 1 7 11 1 9 2 Sen* * 1 5 9 3.5 - I SSt'c3 3 1 1 Coiones s Irritan t toxi c onl y m larg e doses . METHANO L

CH,O H .7 9 , 14 9 6 3
a . 60 0 20. 1 37.00 0 13. 9 SO O 1.11 0 4 6 32 11 2 9 1 Below1 5 6 4 5. 5 - 2 6 4 6 5 3 Colorles s Irritan t cumulative toxicant . Cause s narcosis . e .



### Engin e Manufactu i t o fAlcoho l Fu e 22-25 , 1982
. \ \ GASOHO L 90 % UNLEAOE O GASOLIN E 10 % ETHANO L 73-7 6
7 7 -41 0 25-21 0 18.00 0 41. 9 112.90 0 20. 9 20 0 46 3 8-1 6 55-11 0 •Not e 2 Belo w1 S 1 4 Note 3 5 5 Coiones s t

o iign t amoe reoio r Moderat e irritant . Extrem e concen tratio n cause s narcosis . •



### •ers Is, "

• aP.2 1

20 0 30 0 40 0

Temperature , " P 50 0 60 0 80 0 100 0 i20 0
Kits. K.2 . Vapo rpressur e ofhydrocarbons .P.22

- :o:==~c=ro o 7 ; T:r:5ricoN-' i r - / f-fjirm*r,|..o - C r . r- i rr j c * © (n •o m

o c * -i , i .^j r j —fli —u j V r\ j d 1 rs j —

—t\ . n % '• i —t p r*

* 1/ 7 m r^ . m ^ 2 ^ ' - : : s wo I N I Tp •• n £ft r . ; n - ^ * O I T* J

- •_d-- a . e ?88 0 .8 g
= ooo o • •ofl c

~ O O a r j r g —— —

ryr j r g (\ l N P J O ooaooaoooo o 9 u . r.BnNiin;ni3a t c i N :9~~9*! T"** . 1 * ! 9 " \D^* M ** s a 0^ff t0? * 0 0 0 9 ^ —
•• ( ! •' i rl *• ! rj-^ J f j M f•* •- rocoaoaaoo a c .' - O * O T<7

* —a 3 • » -J

? irt

~ j —T - —<\

» * <J ? m % cm m <£ ••.ul —Kfv.(f . (timfs-ff l — •! •7 - s*

> O P * ^ *> l O ff» r

^ vj ? * •m ^ ••irjin«»*»rn(TirTiff i ^ f^<N^^rj\|7i^i n a
- . f g y ) o —m T» mM

? s o rs . o ( nrs . •t oooooooo o \n

T t n\ b r » c Kp —N m • \ 5

ifttp^^o^tfjQiO O — N 0 09 O O 0 ) Q) ^

D ^B ^D C

D 0 J ddododdbdo b

PW tn m (f

tW i n

j>on? 5 —INM » SSSSSSSSo'o '
iisa«o-<nir«T; « rn#»»»B5ioioif>io «

ninaaeeeoes a 

### 8 5 3

s a C h QNintuJ3°8w'" * S i n - » 1 1 1 t 1 1 i 1 t 1 1 09600006 b QLo ifl - r

j ft t m ^ r

» S ? O i 

# i lP.2 3

' * 

## %{*/<// da?

Onboar d Vehicl e Evaluatio n Updat e Pete r Hutchin s Joh n Anderso n Followin g inspectio n o f th e fue l tank an d fille r nec k fo r an y sign s o f deterioratio n durin g th e tim e tha t th e vehicl e wa s parke d i n th e smal l soa k area , a brie f operationa l evaluatio n wa s performed . Th e evaluatio n include d operatio n o f th e vehicl e o n publi c road s (city , rura l an d expressway) , an

d fueling a t commercia l fue l stations . Vehicl e driveabilit ywa s evaluate d durin g th e on-roa d operations . Fuelin g qualit ywa s evaluate d a t th e commercia l stations . Th e action s take n durin g th e evaluations , existin g ambien t condition s an d result s o f th e evaluation s ar e summarize d below . Driveabilit yevaluation . Thi s par t o f th e evaluatio n include d th e consumptio n o f thre e tank-full s o f fue l an d th e drive s t o an

d fromcommercia l fue l station s fo r fueling qualit yevaluations . Eac ho f th e ful l tank drivedown s wa s initiate d wit ha ful l tank o f fue l an d wa s continue d unti l th e tank wa s empty . Indolen e tes t fue l wa s use d i n th e firs t ful l tank drivedown . Thi s drivedow

n wa s performe d o n Novembe r 2 7 and 2 8 wit hambien t temperature s i n th e 6 8 t o 4 5 F range . Th e vehicl e wa s parke d indoor s prio r t o eac hda yo f operation . O n bot hdays , vehicl e col d star t anomalie s wer e experienced ; i.e . th e engin e di d no t star t durin g th e initia l cranking perio d o f approximatel y1 0 seconds . Engin e star t wa s achieve d a t abou t 3 second s int o th e second crank period . Normal ; i. e good , vehicl e driveabilit ywa s reporte d up t o 19 7 mile s o f operatio n o n da yone . A t thi s point , sever e stumbl e wa s experience d whe n mergin g ont o an expresswaya t ful l throttle . O n da ytwo , following 1 6 mile s o f operatio n (22 1 mile s from

ful l tank ) a stumbl e wa s experience d durin g moderat e acceleratio n fro

m a stop . Tota l mileag e accumulate d o n th e tankful l wa s 28 3 miles . Th e second ful l tank drivedow n wa s performe d o n Decembe r 1 1 and 12 . Thi s drivedow

n wa s performe d wit h8 7 octan e commercia l unleade d purchase d from an Amoc o station . Fuelin g performanc e o f th e onboar d systemwa s good ; i.e . ther e wer e n o prematur e nozzl e shut-off s o r spitback s durin g th e dispensin g o f 11. 2 gallons . Col d start , fro

mroom temperatur e o n th e Indolen e remainin g i n th e tank , require d tw o cranking operations . Prevailin g ambien t temperatur e wa s i n th e 4 5 t o 4 1 F range . On th e firs t da yo f th e drivedown , approximatel y2 0 minute s afte r fueling , a sligh t stumbl e wa s reporte d during entryont o an expressway . Durin g thi s day , multipl e vehicl e stop s an d acceleration s bac k t o spee d wer e performe d withou t driveabilit yincident . Th e second dayo f thi s drivedow

n wa s initiate d wit ha goo d col d star t following overnigh t soa k out-of-doors . N o driveabilit yproblem s wer eP.2 4



## experience d durin g da ytwo . 30 8 mile s wer e accumulate d o n thi s tank o f fuel . Th e thir d tank ful l o f fue l use d i n th e driveabilit yevaluatio n wa s 9 3 octan e unleade d purchase d fro ma n Amoc o station . Fuelin g wa s performe d withou t inciden t a t a dispensin g rat e o f 10. 8 gallon s pe r minute . Th e thir d drivedow n wa s performe d o n Decembe r 2 0 an d 2 1 wit hambien t temperatur e i n th e 4 6 t o 5 0 F range . Col d starts , fromambien t temperature , an d o n roa d driveabilit ywer e good . 31 1 mile s wer e accumulate d o n th e thir d tank o f fuel . Fuelin g evaluations . I n additio n t o th e tw o fueling s performe d a t commercia l station s a s par t o f th e driveabilit yevaluation , eigh t othe r fueling s wer e performed . Thes e fueling s wer e performe d o n February5 through7 a t station s o n th e An n Arbo r area . (Throughou t th e fueling evaluation , th e driveabilit yo f th e vehicl e wa s als o monitored . N o driveabilit ydefect s wer e observed. ) Th e fueling evaluation s wer e initiate d wit ha fue l tank drai n an d th e additio n o f 3. 5 t o 4 gallon s o f fue l a t EPA . Th e vehicl e wa s the n drive n t o a commercia l statio n an d dat a acquisitio n equipmen t connecte d prio r t o fueling . Fue l dispensin g rat e wa s measure d durin g fueling . Fuelin g wa s performe d a t th e maximu m rat e achievabl e fromth e dispensin g pump . Followin g th e firs t automati c shut-of f o f th e nozzl e a t th e ful l tank level , tw o additiona l automati c nozzl e shut-off s wer e performe d a t maximu m flowrat e fo r toppin g of f o f th e tank . Th e commercia l statio n employer , fue l dispensin g rate s an d performanc e o f th e vehicl e systemar e a s follows : Statio n Shell . Carpente r @ US1 2 Shell . Carpente r @ US1 2 Shell . Plymout hRd . Shell . Carpente r @ US1 2 Amoco . Zee b Rd . Mobil . Zee b Rd . Standard . Wash . @ Glen . Shell . Carpente r @ US1 2 Dispensin g Rat e (gpm ) Systemperformanc e 1 0 5 t o 1 0 dro p spi t 6 firs t shut-off . 1 0 5 t o 1 0 dro p spi t @ firs t shut-off . 1 1 N o problems . 1 0 5 t o 1 0 dro p spi t @ firs t shut-off . 10. 6 N o problems . 11. 7 N o problems . 10. 9 N o problem s 1 0 N o problems . (Sam e pum p a s prio r tests , nozzl e changed) . Summary . Th e starting an

d driveabilit ycharacteristic s o f th e vehicl e ar e presentl y(2-8-91 ) good . Fuelin g performanc e o f th e systemi s goo d wit hmos t nozzles . Some fue l spitting mayoccu r dependin g o n th e performanc e o f th e nozzle .P.2 5 

# OuA

^ ^ \ 

## 2

\ PPO^ 0 UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y WASHINGTON , D.C . 2046 0 

# SE P 

# 4 - 199 1

OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N


## Th e Honorabl e Butle r Derric k Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D.C . 2051 5 Dr . Mr . Derrick : Thi s i s i n respons e t o your lette r o f Jul y30 , 199 1 regardin

g EPA' s complianc e t o th e mandat e unde r the 199 0 Clea n Ai r AC t Amendment s t o issu e regulation s requiring onboar d vapo r recover ycontrols . Th e Amendment s requir e EPAt o consul t wit h the Secretar

yo f Transportatio n regardin g safet ybefor e issuing regulation s requirin g onboard controls . Thi s consultatio n i s wel l underway . Th e Nationa l Highwa yTraffi c Safet yAdministratio n (NHTSA) , par t o f the Departmen t o f Transportatio n (DOT) , recentl yrelease d a n update d stud

yo f onboar d safety . EPAi s currentl ypreparing t o publis ha Federa l Registe r notic e announcin

g the availabilit yo f the NHTSAstud yan d scheduling a publi c hearing t o receive comments . Awritte n commen t perio d wil l als o b e announced . W e wil l mak e the fina l determinatio n o n howt o procee d wit hthe rul e base d o n DOT' S conclusion s regardin

g the safet yrisk s o f onboard system' s an d o n th e record develope d durin

g the commen t period . Again , EPAappreciate s the opportunit yt o respon d t o you r comments . Theywil l b e include d i n the publi c docke t fo r thi s rulemaking . Pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t me i f yo u requir e an y additiona l information . Sincerel yyours , 

## ORIGINA L SIGNE D B Y DONAL D E . ZINGE R Richard D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s

Printed on Recycled

Paper

## $

ef % \ |J252J ' "UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y *\P*&<^ WASHINGTON . D.C . 2045 0 

## SE P 

# 4 1991 P.2 6

TH E ADMINISTRATO R



## Governo r Jud

d Gregg Stat e o f Ne wHampshir e Offic e o f the Governo r Concord , N

H 03301-499 0 Dea r Governo r Gregg : Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r lette r date d Jul y2 , 1991 , regarding the implementatio n o f onboar d refuelin g vapo r control s fo r moto r vehicles . I appreciat e you r comments . A s yo u pointe d ou t i n you r letter , Congres s directe d EPA t o promulgat e a

n onboard rul e withi n on e yea r o f enactmen t o f the Clea n Ai r Ac t Amendments , tha t is , b yNovembe r 15 , 1991 . I t als o directe d EPAt o consul t wit hth e Departmen t o f Transportatio n (DOT ) regardin g onboar d systemsafet ya s par t o f thi s rulemaking . Thi s consultatio n i s wel l underway . Th e Nationa l HighwayTraffi c Safet yAdministratio n (NHTSA) , whic h i s par t o f th e DOT , ha s recentl yrelease d a stud yo f onboar d systemsafety . W e ar e reviewin g thi s stud

yan d hav e place d a cop yi n the publi c docke t fo r thi s rulemaking . W e als o plan t o publis ha notic e i n the Federa l Registe r t o announc e a publi c hearing an

d t o solici t comment s fro mthe public . W e wil l mak e the fina l determinatio n o n howt o procee d wit hthe rul e base d on DOT' S conclusion s regardin g safet yrisk s o f onboar d system s an d o n th e record develope d during the commen t period . Thank yo u agai n fo r you r comments . Theywil l b e include d i n the publi c docket . Pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t m e i f yo u requir e an

yadditiona l information .
e » 

## Sincerel y yours , Bil l Willia mK . Reill y SDSB:Kopinski:Harook:256 5 Plymout hRd.:x229:8/12/91:9611W : Las t reviewe d b

yCharle s Gra

y08 / /91:Contro l No . AX-91-222 5 Reviewe d b

yDZinger:BJR:X27647:AR-455:8-14-91:Wang No . 2404 TP.2 7

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y

WASHINGTON , D.C . 2046 0

SEP ' 4 199

1

OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N 

## Th e Honorabl e Joh

n M . Spratt , Jr . Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D.C . 2051 5 Dr . Mr . Spratt : Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r lette r o f Jul y29 , 199 1 requesting tha t the Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y(EPA ) addres s you r comment s concerning onboar d refuelin g vapo r recover ysystems . W e welcome the opportunit yt o do so . You r lette r expresse d concer n regardin g EPA' s complianc e t o the mandat e unde r th e 199 0 Clea n Ai r Ac t Amendment s t o issu e regulation s requiring onboar d vapo r recover ycontrols . Th e Amendment s requir e EP At o consul t wit hthe Secretaryo f Transportatio n regarding safet ybefor e issuin g regulation s requiring onboar d controls . Thi s consultatio n i s wel l underway . Th e Nationa l HighwayTraffi c Safet yAdministratio n (NHTSA) , par t o f the Departmen t o f Transportatio n (DOT) , recentl yrelease d a n update d stud

yo f onboard safety . EPAi s currentl ypreparing t o publis ha Federa l Registe r notic e announcing th e availabilit yo f the NHTS Astud yan d scheduling a publi c hearing t o receiv e comments . Awritte n commen t perio d wil l als o b e announced . W e wil l mak e the fina l determinatio n o n howt o procee d wit hthe rul e base d o n DOT' S conclusion s regarding th e safet yrisk s o f onboar d system s an d o n the record develope d during th e commen t period . Again , EPAappreciate s th e opportunit yt o respon d t o you r comments . The ywil l b e include d i n the publi c docke t fo r thi s rulemaking . Pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t me i f yo u requir e an y additiona l information . Sincerel yyours , 

## ORIGINA L SIGNE D B Y DONAL D E . ZINGE R Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s SDSB:Pugliese:CumTSll:X349:2565PLYMOUTHRD:08/21/91:4747 W Las t reviewe d b

yCharle s Gray:08 / /91:Contro l No . AL91320 9 Reviewe d b

yDZinger:BJR:X27447:AR-455:8-21-91:Wang No . 2424 T

Printed on Recycled

PaperP.2 8 

## Goto

Graha a A . O'Conno r Presiden t



### Septembe r 23 , 199 1

Mr . GlennW . Passavan t Senio r Projec t Manage r U.S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y Offic e o f Mobil e Source s 256 5 Plymout hRoad An nArbor , M I 4810 5 Dea r Glenn : Than kyo ufo r th e time yo uan dDonKopinsk i spen t wit hJef f Broadhurs t an dm e concernin g th e subjec t matte r o f fue l tankbladder s o n1 3 Septem be r 1991 . Jeffre y an dI hav e take nunde r consideratio nyou r comment s an drecommen dation s andintendt o respondaccordingly . Your s truly , >

GAO/m s cc : DonKopinsk i Jef f Broadhurs t

IHHOVAT I ON S & TECHNOLOGIES , IMC . **0 * Weatdal eCourt . For tWorth , Texa s 7610 9 Te l 81 7 923-030 0 Fa x81 7 346-316 4P.2 9



# JU L I 7 199 1

Governo r Jame s G . Marti n Stat e o f Nort hCarolin a Offic e o f the Governo r Raleigh , NC 27603-800 1 Dea r Governo r Martin : Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r lette r t o EPAAdministrato r Willia mK . Reill ydate d Jun e 12 , 1991 , regardin g th e implementatio n o f onboar d refuelin g vapo r control s fo r moto r vehicles . W e appreciat e you r comments . A s yo u pointe d ou t i n you r letter , Congres s directe d th e EPAt o promulgat e a n onboar d rul e withi n on e yea r o f enactmen t o f the Clean Ai r Ac t Amendments , tha t is , b yNovembe r 15 , 1991 . I t als o directe d EPAt o consul t wit hth e Departmen t o f Transportatio n (DOT ) regardin g onboard syste

msafet ya s par t o f thi s rulemaking . Thi s consultatio n i s wel l underway . Th e Nationa l HighwayTraffi c Safet yAdministratio n (NHTSA) , whic h i s par t o f the DOT , i s planning t o releas e a n assessmen t o f onboard syste

msafet ythi s month . Whe n w e receiv e thi s repor t EP Awil l publis ha notic e i n th e Federa l Registe r announcing the reopenin

g o f the publi c commen t perio d o n th e origina l onboard proposal , whic hwa s issued i n 1987 . Becaus e thi s wa s severa l year s ago , the Federa l Registe r notic e wil l contai n a n assessmen t o f circumstance s tha t have change d sinc e tha t time . W e wil l als o conduc t a publi c hearin g on the matte r late r thi s summer . Thank s agai n fo r you r comments . Theywil l b e include d i n the publi c docke t fo r thi s rulemaking . Pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t me i f yo u requir e an yadditiona l information . Sincerel yyours , 

## ORIGINA L SIGNE D B Y DONAL D E . ZINGE R Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s SDSB:H.Puliese:334:256 5 Plymout hRd:DD#4738 W Las t Reviewe d b

yPhi l Lorang:7/16/91:Contro l No . AX91192 4 Reviewe d b

yDZINGER:hp:x27647:7/17/91:AR-455:Wang No.2328 T

### XJG-08-199 1 10:4 6 FRO MEP A MOBIL E SOURCES T

O ^, ^ J*??~ ^ 

# STATE O F NE WHAMPSHIRE Got?*. OFFIC E O F THE GOVERNOR JUD D GREGG

. GOVERNO

R

Jul y 2, 199 1



### Mr . Willia

m E . Reilly , Administrator U.S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y 4Q 1 M Street,-S-.W. . . . . _. . — . — Roo m 1200 , Ves t Tove r Washington , DC 2046 0
Dear Mr . Reilly : On e o f th e important issue s facin g th e Environmenta l Protectio nAgency , a s it carrie s ou

t th e provision s o f th e 199 0 Amendment s t o th e Clea nAi r Act , i s th e implementatio

no f a gasolin

e vapor recover

y program . Suc

ha progra

m voul d provid e neededreduction s i nemissions i narea s that experienc e th e vors t violation s o f th

e Nationa l Ambien

t Ai r Qualit

y Standar

dfo r ozone . However , th e implemente

dprogra

m mus t b e economically

feasible , easily

enforceable , an

d acceptabl e t

o th e publi c i nterm

s o f cost s an

dconvenience . Sectio n202(a)(6 ) o f th e Clea nAi r Ac t Amendment s charge EP A with promulgatio

no f a nonboar

dvapor recover

y standar

dvithi non

e year o f enactment o f th e Amendments . I strongly urge yout

o expeditiously

comply

wit hthi s statutor

y deadline , becaus e o f th e considerabl e emissio nreduction s a

nonboar

d standar dvoul dprovide t o ozon e non-attainment areas . No t only non-attainment area s benefi t fro

m thi s program , sinc e vehicle , manufacturer s vil l likely introduce improve

donboar

dvapor recover

y system s i nal l area s o f th e nation . Moreover , improve

donboar

dsystem

s mee t th

e test s o f economi c feasibility , enforceability , an

dpubli c acceptance . Than kyoufor your consideratio no f m y positio

no nthi s important issu e fo r Ne w Hampshire an

dth e nation. . Pleas e keepme informe donth

e statu s o f EPA' s progres s onthi s matter . Sincerely ,

0978S/tm

s

STATE HOUS E • CONCORD . NE W HAMPSHIR E 03301-4990 • TELEPHONE : 603-271-212 1P.3 1 

### £CF D P.0 5 • ' 

# 6 

# 0/3

STAT E O F NORT H CAROLIN A OFFIC E OF TH E GOVERNO

R RALEIG H 27603-800 1 JAME S aMARTI

N GOVBINO R

## June 12 / 199 1 Mr . Willia

m K . Reill y Administrator Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y 40 1 M Street , S.W . Roo m 120 0 Wes t Tower ...Washington , D.C . 2046 0 Dea r Mr . Reilly : On e o f th e important issue s facin g th e Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , a s i t carrie s out th e provision s o f th

e 199 0 Amendment s to th e Clea nAi r Act , i s th

e implementatio

no f a gasoline vapo r recover y program . Suc

ha progra

m woul dprovid

e neededreduction s i nemissions i narea s tha t experienc e th e wors t violation s o f th e Nationa l Ambient Ai r Quality Standar

dfo r Ozone . However , th e implemente

dprogra

m mus t b e economicall y

feasible , easil y

enforceabl e an dacceptabl e t o th

e publi c interm

s o f cost s an

dconvenience . Sectio n202(a){6 ) o f th

e Clea nAi r Ac t Amendment s charge EP A with promulgatio

no f a nonboar

dvapor recover

y standar

dwithi none year o f enactmen

t o f th e Amendments . I strongly urg e yo ut o expedi tiously comply wit hthi s statutor y deadline , becaus e o f th e con siderabl e emissio

nreduction s a

nonboar

dstandar

dwoul dprovide t o ozon e non-attainment areas . No t only non-attainment area s benefi t fro

m thi s program , since vehicl e manufacturer s wil l likel y introduce improve

donboar

dvapor recover

y system s inal l area s o f th e nation . Moreover , improve donboar

dsystem

s mee t th

e test s o f economi c feasibility , enforceability an dpubli c acceptance . Than kyo ufo r you r consideratio

no f m y positio

no nthi s important issu e fo r NorthCarolin

a an dth e nation . Pleas e keepme informed o nth e statu s o f EPA' s progres s o nthi s matter . Sincerely , 

# iS.TfUz; G . Marti n JGM/j y
*: =P.3 2 

## &0/S~



# A SYSTE M FO R TH E CONTRO L O F VEHICL E EVAPORATIN G AN D REFUELIN G EMISSION S Augus t 199 0 Numbe r1/9 0

BACKGROUN D 

### m^mmm—m*amm^mm*me^mmmmmmtw*m—mmma^ Th e subjec t o f evaporative volatile organic compoun demission s fro

mgasoline fuele dvehicle s has recentl

y becom e asubjec t o f majo r public an dpolitica l interest i nth e U S an di nEurope . Carbo ncanisters containing activatedcharcoa l t o adsor b evaporative emis

sion s have bee

nusedfo r man y years i ntheUSA , Japa

nan dAustrali aan

dmor e recentl y als o i nEurope . Th e functio no f thes e canisters has onl

y bee nt o adsor b th e emission s tha

t occu r whe nth eca r i s drive no r whe nthe tan k breathe s a s aresult

o f temperatur

e variations
. Theemission s tha t aris e durin

g vehicle refueling , duet

o th edisplace

men t o f vapo r fro mth efue l tan k b y incomin g liquidfuel , though , has not yet bee n asubjec t o f unifor mcorrective measures . TW O SYSTE M APPROACHE S AR E CONSIDERED ! ^ewemam^me—mm* 

### 1 . Since 197

4 som e countie s i

nCali

forniahave introducedth

e ..Service StationVapo

r Recover y System" . Thi s operate s b

y usin g aseparat e pipe t o sen ddisplacedvapo

r fro mthe vehicle fue l tan k bac k t o th e under

groun dtank
. Thi s approac

hrequire s no t onl y th e reequipmen

t o f allservic e stationpump s but

als o all vehicle s t

o be equippedwit

hastandardizedfue

l fillin g orifice
. 2 . Equippin

g th evehicle s wit

ha nenlarge dversiono

f th e carbo ncaniste r describedabove
. Wit

hthi s syste

m vapor emission s tha

t aris e whe

n refuelin g ar eadsorbedb

y the canister
. Subsequently , the caniste

r i s desorbed b y drawin g ai r throug hi t an dint o th e engine
. Thi s syste

mi s referre

dt o a s the „On-Boar

dRefueling Contro l System" . COMPARISO N BETWEEN TH E TW O SYSTE M APPROACHES : >^_
_ 

### Th e Service StationVapo

r Recover y Syste mha s thedisadvantag e o

f bein g mor e expensive an

dles s efficien

t tha nthe On-Boar

dRefuelin g Control System,see compariso nbelow :
Efficienc yo f emissio n captur e Cost pe rretaine d 1,000kgofgasol i

lin e Servic e Statio n Vapo rRecover

y 5 5 % 13,29 0 DM/ t On-Boar d Refuelin g Contro l 9 8 %
77 0 DM/ t Source : MW

V (Th eGerma

nPetroleum Industr

y Anociitian ) 

### Th e on-boar dsyste mapproac hprimaril y has bee ncriticizedfor : 1 . Bein g too „bulky " - aminimu

msize o f 5 1 caniste r fo r a50 1 tan k i s required
. 2 . Th e physica l for mo f th esyste mwhic hmake s i t difficul t t o adapt an d integrat e int o the automobile
. 3 . A nincreasedsecurit

y risk a s aconsequence o

f th eintc-grationo

f the enlargedcanisters an

dpipe s i nth e vehicle
. 4 . Th e reducedimmediat

e emissionretentionduet

o thefac t tha t th esyste mca n onl y be implemente

di nne w cars . ©b/BLOCHE R NEWSLETTER : 1/9 0P.3 3



# TH E BLUECHE

R APPROAC H 

# O . u r ai mhas bee nto develo

p a nactivatedcharcoa

l filte r fo r th e On-Boar dRefuelin g Control Syste

m that : ^>C : 

# 4 > * Require s less volum e Ha s a n improved , mor e flexible , for m desig n Provide s a safe rsyste m TH E FOLLOWIN G CRITERI A AR E DECISIV E FO R TH E EFFCIENC YO F TH E ADSORPTIV E MEDIU M I N THI S APPUCATION : 

### 1 . TH E ADSORPTIO N KINETIC S O F TH E CHOSE N ADSORBER

S «^^^
_ 

### Basicall y thi s i s adynamic proces s wher e smalleradsorbcrs shoul

dbe use d i norde r t o increas e th

e oute r surface areaan dt o shorte nthe distanc e be

twee nth e initia l an dfinal adsorption
. Sinc e thi s normall

y lead s t o poore r flo w characteristic s large

r particle s have traditionally bee

nchosen
. Bluechc r designedits filter

wit h smal l spherica l adsorbers (0 0.4-0. 7 mm ) adhere do nafoa mmatrix , thereb

y optimizing adsorptionan

dflo w char

acteristics
. The efficienc

y o f th e sys te mals o depend s o

nth e por e structur e of th e adsorbe r

whic hha s been optimizedfo

r thi s applicationduring manufacture
. 2 . TH E ADSORPTIO N 

### CAPACIT Y IMMI ^ 

### The utilizationcapacit

y (the workin

g capacit y including the remaining capacit y fo r the next filling) an

dthe maximu mquantit y o f gasoline vapo

r t o be adsorbeddetermine th

e tota l ad

sorbe r capacit y needed
. Preliminar

y test results have show

ntha t fo r ever y 20 1 tan k conten t approximatel

y 1 1 o f ou r filte r mediu mi s needed
. 3 . TH E DESORBABIUT YO F 

### TH EVAPOR S MMn^i^i M The gasoline vapors ar

e chemicall

y not homogenou s sinc e the

y consis t o f chemical s wit

hdifferen t molecula r weights an dboiling points
. I norde r t o adsor b substance s wit

h lo w molecula

r weights lik

e butane , smalle r sizedmicropore s ar

e needed
. These , however, ar

e easil y chokedb y large r molecule s (e.g . octanes ) whic h wil l not easil y desor b an dtherefor e reduc e the efficienc

y o f th e filter. Blueche r use s atechnique (paten

t pending ) wher

e differen t layers are usedfo r th e adsorptiono

f th e differen t substances
. Sinc e the desorptionflo w i s i nth e reverseddirectiono

f the ad

sorptionflo

w the risk o f cross-contaminationi s eliminated
. 4 . OTHE R FEATURE

S ^^^ M 

### Th e Blueche r product ca nb e cut an d forme dint o virtuall y an y shape t o fit th e specific requirements o

f th e ca r designer
. W

e ar e no t restrictedt

o a typica l caniste r for mwhic hi nman y case s i s difficul

t t o locat e o r install
. Consequently , alocationfo

r the filte r ca nb e chose nwit hahighe r degree o f safet y an dlowe r cost s fo r the ca r manufacturer
. The primar

y safet y concer nwit h the traditiona

l caniste r has bee nit s assume dpropensit

y t o catc hfire. TH E FOLLOWIN G ADVANTAGE S VS . CONVENTIONA L ACTI VATE D CARBO N CANISTER S CA N B E IDENTIFIED :
•A reductio n i n volume . Preliminar ytests hav e show n tha t approximatel y 1 I filte rmediu m i s require d fo rever y2 0 I tan k content . A reductio n i n weight . A n infinit e flexibilit yi n desig n an d adaptabilit yo fth e filte r whic h wil l enhanc e th e security . A n improve d safet yo fth e syste m du e t o a reduce d propensit y fo rth e filte rt o becom e overheated . A substantiall ylowe rpressur e drop . Th e absenc e o fcarbo n dus t whic h ca n aris e whe n traditiona l canister s ar e expose d t o vibrations . 

### The Blueche

r filte r reduce s the risk

o f th e creationo

f „ho t spots" , unde

r all circumstances , b

y the predetermined an dfixeddistance s betwee nthe adsorbers
. The hig

hair permeabilit

y o f the filte r mediu mals o reduce s the risk o f overheating
. Anothe r advantag e o

f the Bluechc

r filter i s its goodairflow characteristic
. Th e measuredpressur

e dro p i s u p t o te ntime s les s tha

nfo r conventiona

l caniste r filters. Furthermore , th

e ap plicationo

f adsorbers o

namatrix guarantee ahomogenou s utilizationo f th e filte r volume
. Finally , th e Blueche r filte r i s aver y clea nfilter. The absenc e o

f carbo n dust , eve nafte r exposur e to vibration , shouldb e o

f considerable interes t

t o bot hth e filte r an dca r manufacturers
.P.3 4 

## l>k i 1/V7/3 , ****

Cap-oV V v"aipcy rr\eU**e - @ 5"W X 

### Q Ta* KPrs^ujs ,



# ^ 1 " X
A m = 

# r^w^Ov

/ 

# = ^ r% - 

# ) i P,«5 tt 

## U* 0

' deivs^OS-U^ C

relcaso.a

\ \f = vapo rspace .

\/ = (\< o 6 

### a \ ) f90 % ) Clssumt , \ 6 ^ \ fc^, \ot fk\l )

= (\4.4 s 

### *\)/rj.4©^\/^ ) 

# » 2. 0 ft? \4.-7* ZS H 

# \\& faj.l m 

# V&/vAy\ 

# - ]

e

### . OZL

4 P i (iffiyiili V m Pim i u £ ^MIIM. ) 

### *f2^ r 

### i^SrSame 9. 0 «>*

£RV YPua A , 90F* . fc^tul Con e » 54 £(volu** ) (M*ck«. U \zA3T«AR« T 

### *. ) 

### p.»s ) pa i Ui« V f ^ « 8 p«i v(^A»* \ pressure ) C

s . OZ2 . *.eU/j £ nvolt c v* t o? £*soW . * 100$/IA*W . 

### (rV?X. , McoU U * stiver* , p . i ) 

# •' •/» * e

# 6o o 6 

# /«•\cX.o^ ^ K«U/j?j(-^rf^^X-s§r9' . | 4 U^/Pt 3\
* i OK

II P-Q Ii P. •. =. 1 POCWA •tttttnttn* + t + nttTTir"nni i



## Januar y 18 , 199 1 HOTE: T

o Glen nPassavant , OMS/An nArbo r Subject : Vehicl e Refuelin g an dGasolin e Reforraula t io n FMf-ii

- MU X P.3 5

Xhav o boo ncallin g t o cot ; u pa confcronc o cal l -t o dixvux x oMrs' » 

## presen t an

d pas t vehicl e refueling studie s an d gasolin e reformulatio n studies . Belo war e th e item s w e woul d lik e t o discus s wit hyo u an d other s i n Ann Arbor J vehicl e Refueling : 1 ) Statu s an

d nex t step s (schedule ) o n promulgatio n o f onboar d refueling controls . Also , I woul d lik e t o b e o n th e workin g rrrmi p fo r "hhi s p mjwrr

h. 2 ) Pau l Argyropoulo s (OMS/FOSD ) an d I ar e working o n th e Agencie s _^iSpi.^ent«T.ior i O i scagf* . j t_jfiora;rojs . inav e tn e lead on developin g a technica l guidanc e documen t fo r Stag e I I control s (statemen t o f wor k attached ) an d Pau l ip working o n th e enforoemen totejra*<s«ry . Cino « th o proposa l o £ unbv«t<l , xhav e 

## los t contac t o n som e project s o r wor k yo u hav e t*ee n doing-o n refuelinr j controls . Belo war e some o f th e proiect s o r wor k I woui. a xuc e r o discuss : 5>t-V-T D t-i-r-t s - Additiona l wor k o n th e refueling emissio n facto r equation . LMp-.\stx > :<^b\ )

. . . • "f57V9o" \ - Servic e statio n siz e distribution . /= * - v 

## ''-.' " ;: V



## - w

## '• - > oHv'-^^j^a a memo:»^G,^:NPr : " - - - 0-*"**>*«5> . wa ^ _ / dUfcs . - Opillacf efr-ox aconycntiono l an d ota^ eI I noaoloo . StW.^w^ . 0 ? r^J T ffccorf c/o<>s> . 3.AA \. £ ^* trepor tt o -5 . ST . L i —=^ r""

" "—"~Bar-o»"feHixv

3 »*v 3 oTnp+-y S r>

A amieeinn cfrru m nnrfororoiinr i Rfcrvrao'f i , tan kvonte . "*r\sur'zr\4SS i ••=*'"^-OM'f cr.zx»<i . /Svc . Str \dkaUr s KGj\\C . I rA«.A\ 0 ? br^^l , ^ - - _M3fl 8> 

## pcc P 

## \-i . to sv

e -*ns ; - Trip s t o Stag e I I servic e stations . vv^ yWa-'i . bi^

v--4V O - Emissio n los s testing o r studie s o n Stag e I T nozzles . Gasolin e Reformulatio n an d Reductio n o f Ai r Toxic s I n Gasolines : W e hav e starte d th e developmen t o f a Nationa l Emissio n Standar d fo r Hazardou s pollutant s (NESHAP ) fo r Stag e I Gasolin e Marketin g Facilitie s (se e attache d star t Actio n Request) . I wil l pu t yo u o n th e wor k grou

p fo r thi s project , i f yo u o r someon e els e i n An n Arbo r i s interested . Th e Stag e I NESHAP wil l b e base d o n contro l o f an y organi c constituent s i n gasolin e vapo r tha t ar e liste d a s on e o f th e 18 9 hazardou s ai r pollutant s (HAP ) i n th e CAA Ao f 1990 . Thu s w e mus t establis hwhic hHA P compound s (an d ho wmuch ) ar e i n presen t an d futur e gasolines .P.3 6



### JP. N1 8 '9 1 15:5 1 'RO M 88838tt88{t3S«3«SS B ••. ; i ' "&'/ PAGE . 30 3 '-Y-i-^-trCf/Vc:



## 1 ) W e woul d like t o lear n th e purpose , status , schedule , an d contac t person(s ) fo r an yo f th e project s tha t OM S ha s o n th e reformulatio n an d ai r toxi c provision s unde r Titl e I I o f th e 199 0 CAA Atha t wil l impac t th e compositio n o f gasolin e vapors . 2 ) W e hav e ver ylimite d dat a o n eithe r th e vapor o r liqui d phas e HA P compound s i n gasolines . It s myunderstandin g someon e i n OM S i n An n Arbo r ha s alread ybee n meetin g wit hAPI,W e woul d lik e t o fin d ou t wha t the yar e doing , s o w e don' t duplicat e ou r efforts . Doe s OM

S hav ed<j»t-

aOi l Lh eMA

PuonLeit L i nycisulin evctpoi . UJ L 4-4-^^^)^ * 4-t- « * « . A n . v-4-W.- . «t/\/ » TiAr » -.- !••.«• • •^X'!-*^* * -* f ^. ^ ^ X «>.*

vw. t-n^^-

w -A^-wa w -A - -WK- - • « . .- • I 

## Pleas e cal l (FT S 629-5397) , s o w e ca n schedul e a time t o discus s th e above . ^ ^ Stev e Shed d
ts? 

### (jh-W*/. 

### kit. K 

### ?*l 

### • B' "P.3 7 

# 5>-

;".. . :• - A

- >.'.u._v:. . - . a-xlfiVi-jr
. v ^
- • •< /



## " r 

## ' ; o T" hzr ( 

## v jk / r-z . v .

X 

## W_ , . ? 

## 5X- F

...... J l S r

## or - S-bT T" voV > v-.-.l'ce - •

•ix> SW e ~S 'P.3 8



# A 

# Pr /Z-p+Xy-^yp. Q4^V- N <^~-vx^O<~<r*^J ; s^^ri^jZL, S? 5



### pn^^Yfab—

J t^yj^c
—^v«^-»< 7 - ~ 0'6-5 7~y*^-£r c> M6 ^^4*. *~? jt~f

^1 . ^^^^^f

//. i^X

/i^tt? - ^----^^Cr ? /i *

—/«^-*~-£ > , G./fg/<WT- fJ^*r—

(-A^*rf

5 5

J/Yep -&Z7

^ ,<£~^^

_/czy&z^ *>tf^ 

# ^T\ ^

—

# c- ; / ^ / 

# ^/ £ --&*< 

## ji^ . 7P.3 9



## Documentatio n fo r Charle s Gray 

# JH0Q2.

Dat e submitted : 

# K)/a ~ Charle s requeste d Charle s requeste d ASA P Shoul d se e immediatel y Shoul d se e today Shoul d se e by 

# 1 Genera l readin g FY I Submitte dby : \~~ V 4 <nu ? 

# frV <$' 

# VP.4 0

GCT-Q1-199 1 13:2 3 FRO M EP AMOBIL E SOURCE S 

### T O ECT D P . 0 2 

### DLLJ.E R SHANNO

N TEL: ' 1-202-338-187 1 

## Oct1-9 1 11:4 9 No.01 5 P.0 2

Rober tA . Collie r(1917-1084 } Thoma eP . Shannon Willia m W , Sco w David A . Hartquis t R . Timothy Columbus lAurenR. Huwai d Pau l D . Cullea KathleenR

. McDermot

t Michae l D . Sheraton Mar kL. Aaatrlao JeffreyW

. Kin g Joh nP . William * Pau l C . RoftcnUm

l Jame s R. Loftls . Il l 

# Joh nL . Wiitenbo m 

### cfn-e yL Lette r Michae l R . Kerahow Jeflre y S . Becktagto o Judit h t. Oldha

m JeanneM . Fetc h Laurenc eJ . Laaot T ChristopherJ . MeeAro

y Patric kJ . Coyne Kere nM . Lock-woo

d Denni s J . WhllUeeey Dougla aW . Churaa a Willia m C . MacLeod * Sea nF . X . Roland Patric kB . raxrone " K . Michae l O'Cormel

l Htrold W . Purma nII • •rawe r1 * uxnuu 

# Collier , Shanno n& -Scott Attor'ncys-at'La

w 305 0 KStreet , N.W. Washington , D.C . 2000 7 Telephone : (80S ) 343-840 0 telecopier : (202 ) 338-553 4 "Wlrtter' o DirectDia

l Numbe r 

## (202 ) 342-8555 September25 , 199 1 KathleenWeave rCannon Danie l J . Hftxroli Gar y L . Melunp y T . Michae l Janko\»ak

i Mar y T . Stolc y Robert , M. Hnbe r R . Randa l Blac k Merc y M . Rehbcrgcr Willia m A . Henr

y J . Keith Auabrook RobinA . Faatena

u Keith J . Harmo n Mar kIC Logon * RobinK . Gflbe n A . Abigail Payn e Marti nA . Wrigh

t Willia m M. Guexry

. Jr . Bernard A . Nigro , Jr. DawnM. Sonok * CarolynO . TUlma

n Nichola s D . Giordano Kenri eL . Hoo k AlexanderH . Pttofeky JoannaK . Mcintosh * CatherineA . Mlcklitac

h Jeffre y L . Posto n SeanL . Cothn" ' Josep h S . Gcrba«t* Jaeo nM . Bnuvafortc* Stephe nA . Jone s Pamel aL . Edd

y AlaaA . B . McDowell • *wr«oi«mM»»« . 

## CERTIFIE

D MAt l RETUR

N RECEIP

T REQUESTE

D AdministratorWillia

m K . Reilly U.S . Environmenta

l ProtectionAgenc

y 40 1 M Street, S.W. Washington, D C 2046 0 DearAdministratorReilly :

y .• » 

## Eas tCoastCorporationan d Sheetz , Inc. ar

cretai l marketer

s o f gasolin ean

d therefore , hav

ea ninterestinrequirement s unde rth eCleanAirAc

t("Act" ) to control gasolin evapor

s emitte d durin

gvehicl erefueling. EastCoastCorporation , wit h corporat

e headquarter

s located a

t142 0 EastCommerc

eRoad , Richmond , Virginia23224 , operates 44 moto rfue

l retail outlets throughou tVirginia, Sheetz , Inc. , wit h corporat

e headquarter

s located a

t570 0 Sixt

h -Avenue, Altoona , Pennsylvania16602 , owns an d operates achainof

conveniencestores whic h sel l gasolinet

o consumers throug

h 15 7 outlets locate d i nth estate s o f Pennsylvania, Maryland, Wes tVirginiaand Virginia .

• 

## Therearetwo generally recognized mean s to control emission s o f

gasolin evapors durin gvehicl erefueling- "stag eIT controls installed ongasolinedispensingequipment, an d onboar d vaporrecover

y controls installed onmotorvehicles . A s ameans of controllingthes erefuelingemissions , section202(a)(6 ) of theActrequires tha

tth e Administratorof

theEnvironmenta

l ProtectionAgenc

y ("EPA"), b

y Novembe r15 , 1991 , afterconsultationwit

h theDepartmentof

Transportationregardin gsafet y issues , issue regulations requirin

gmolorvehicles b eequippe d wit h onboar d vaporrecover

y controls . 4 2 U.S. C § 7521 . Sectio n202(a)(6 ) provides :P.4 1



### OCT-01-199 1 13:2 4 FRO M EPf lMOBIL ESOURCES T O ECT D P.0 3 CULL-lt K

SHHNNU N. I tl

_: i-^U^-oi»-i » (iuu t Xi3 i ±i-<t? nu.vu r.u j


## Collier , Shanno n& Scot t

^ 

## September25 , 199 1

Pag e2 (6 ) Onboar

d Vapo rRecover

y - Withi

nyearafte

rth edate o f enactmentof

th eClea nAi rAc tAmendment

s of 1990 , th e Administratorshall , afte

rconsultationwit

h th eSecretar

y o f Transportationregardin gthe safet

y of vehicle-base d ("onboard" ) systems fo

rth e contro

l of vehicl erefuelin g emissions , promulgat

estandard

s unde rthis sectio nrequiring tha tnewlight-dut

y vehicles manufacture

d beginningin th e fourt h mode l yearafterth

emode l yea rinwhic h thestandards ar epromulgated an

d thereaftershal

l b eequipped wit

h suc h systems . Th estandard

s require d underthis paragraph shall appl y t o apercentageo

f eac h manufacturer' s fleeto f new light-dut y vehicle s beginningwit

h th efourt h model yearafter * themodel, yeari

nwhic h thestandard

s ar epromulgated . Th e percentageshal

l b e a s specified i

n thefollowingtable : Mode l yearcommencingafte

rPercentagestandards promulgated Fourt h 4 0 Fift h 8 0 AfterFift h 10 0 Percentages i

nth etablerefert

o apercentageo

f themanufacturer' s sale s volume . Th estandards shall requir etha tsuc h systems providea : 

## minimu m evaporativeemissioncaptur eefficienc

y o f 95 • t 

## percent. Th erequirement s of sectio n182(b)(3 ) (relatin gto stageI I gasolinevaporrecovery) fo rarea s classified under • . sectio n18 1 .as'moderat efo rozon eshal

l no tappl

y after .promulgationof

suc h standard

s an d theAdministratormay, b y rule , reviseorwaiveth eapplicationof

therequirement

s of suc h section-182(b)(3 ) fo

rarea s classified undersectio n 18 1 as Serious , Severe , orExtrem efo rozone , a

s appropriate , afte rsuc h timea s theAdministratordetermines tha tonboar d emissions control system s require d underthis paragrap

h ar e inwidespread us ethroughou tthemotorvehicl efleet . 4 2 U.S.C . § 7521 . A s a ninterim measur

efo rcontrollingrefuelingemissions , sectio n182(b)(3 ) o f the Actrequires tha

t"stag eII" vaporrecover

y controls b einstalled ongasolin edispensing equipmen tlocated in"moderate, " "serious, " "severe, " an d "extreme " ozon enonattainment areas . 4 2 U.S.C . § 75lla(b)(3) .P.4 2 

## «r*-"?J.... 13,a 5 FR0 M

## .^.T'^Ka n T 

## ° ue . 1.9 1 11.4 9 MO.OTIP.0 4

^ 

## Collier , Shanno n& Scot t

September25 , 199 1 Page3 Sectio n202(a)(6 ) of

th eAc tmandate

s tha tupo npromulgationo f

th eregulation requirin gonooar d vaporrecover

y controls therequiremen tto us e"stag

eII " i n"moderate " ozon enonattainmen

tareas mus

tb ewaived , an

d tha ttherequirementt o us e"stag eIT intheothe rozon enonattainmen tarea s ma y b ewaived oncevehicle s equipped wit h onboar d vaporrecover

y controls ar

ei nwidesprea

d us ethroughou

tth emoto rvehicl e fleet . 4 2 U.S. C 5 7521 . W eviewtheAdministrator' s dut y undersectio n202(a)(6 ) t o b enon-discretionary . W ehaverecently becom eaware, throug h statement

s b y various EP

A officials , thatyou d o no tintend t o issuetheonboar d vaporrecover

y contro l regulatio nrequired b

y th e Act . Yourfailur

eto discharg

ethis non-discretionar

y dut y wil l caus einjur

y t o Eas tCoast Corporationan

d Sheetz , Inc. a

s wel l a s otherpersons intereste d i ntheful

l implementationof

therequirement

s of th eAct. Specifically , failur eby EPA t

o issu eth e regulationrequirin

gonboar d vaporrecover

y controls wil

l resultinth e"stag

ei r requiremen

tforfue l retai l outlets located inozon enonattainmen tareas notbeingwaived as mandate

d b y theAct, an

d ma y eventuall

y resulti n"stag eII " control s bein grequired a tfuel retai

l outlet s nationwide . Sectio n304(a)(2 ) of

th eAc tprovides tha

t"an y personma

y commenceacivil actiononhis ow

nbehalf againstth eAdministratorwherether eis allege d afailur

eo f th eAdministratorto perfor m an y ac to rdut y underthis Ac

twhic h i s nordiscretionar

y ^ wit

h th eAdministrator. " 4 2 U.S. C $ 7604(a)(2) . Tha tsectio nfurthe

rprovides tha

tn o actionma y b ecommenced unde

rsection304(a)(2 ) "prio rt o 60 day s aftertheplaintif

f ha s givennoticeof

suc h actiont

o th eAdministrator. " 4 2 U.S.C . $ 7604(b)(2) . I naccordanc

ewit h therequirement

s of section30

4 of th eCleanAirAct , 4 2 U.S. C § 7604 , an

d 4 0 CF.R . § 54 , Eas

tCoastCorporatio

nan d Sheetz , Inc . hereby exercis etheirrigh

tto commenceacivi

l actionagainstEP

A fo rfailur et o perfor

m its nondiscretionar

y dut y a s setfort h insectio n202(a)(6 ) of theClea nAi rAct, 4 2 U.S.C . $ 7521 . This lette rconstitutes EastCoastCorporation' s an d Sheetz , Inc' s sixty-da y notic eof theirintentt

o commenc

esuc h actionregardin

gEPA' s failuret o issuethe onboar d regulation . Respectfully submitted ,
R. Timoth

y Columbus Counse l to EastCoas tCorporation an d Sheetz , Inc .
y

## CALGO N P.4 3 

## /joo$: ~

CALGO N CARBO N CORPORATIO N P.O . BO X71 7 PITTSBURGH , P A 15230-071 7 (412)787-670 0 Apri l 24 , 199 1 TWX : 67 1 183 7 CC C PC H FAX . 412-787-684 3 ' 412-787-668 2

Mr . Ton yTesorier o Mai l Cod e EN-340 F U.S . ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENC Y 40 1 M Street , S W Washington , D C 2046 0 Dea r Mr . Tesoriero : I t wa s a pleasur e talkin g wit hyo u recentl yregardin g a reques t fo r informatio n b

yyou r Mr . Le o Breton . Yo u indicate d Mr . Breto n wa s intereste d i n informatio n o n th e effec t o f purg e ai r versu s activate d carbo n workin g capacit ya s use d i n automotiv e evaporativ e los s contro l canisters . A n additiona l questio n wa s th e effec t o f gasolin e vapo r rat e t o a n activate d carbo n caniste r o n th e caniste r design . I a m enclosin g severa l paper s tha t wer e presente d t o th e SA E recently . I n ou r SA E Pape r 890621 , gasolin e vapo r breakthroug hstudie s wer e performed . O n pag e # 6 o f thi s paper , th e effec t o f purg e volum e o n gasolin e vapo r workin g capacit ywa s studied . Ou r wor k indicate s th e greates t improvemen t i n workin g capacit yi s achieve d i n th e firs t 20 0 be d volumes , afte r whic hth e improvemen t o f workin g capacit ybecome s les s significant . Earlie r wor k b yCalgo n Carbo n ha s show n tha t fo r th e volumetri c flo wrate s studied , th e rat e o f gasolin e vapo r desorptio n i s essentiall yindependen t o f th e linea r velocity . Instead , th e rat e o f desorptio n i s governe d primaril yb yth e volum e o f ai r tha t i s passe d throug h th e carbo n be d durin g th e purg e cycle . I amenclosin g a brochur e tha t describe s thi s work . Se e page s 5 & 6 . (Rat e o f Ai r Flo wDurin g Purge. ) I n addition , I di d discus s wit hou r R& D peopl e you r questio n regardin g th e effec t o f gasolin e vapo r rat e t o th e canister . The yindicat e w e hav e looke d a t vapo r loadin g rate s a t approximatel y1/ 3 o f th e rat e typica l o f curren t caniste r design s fo r contro l o f diurna l vapo r and a t 3 time s thi s rat e and hav e no t statisticall ysee n anydifferenc e i n th e activate d carbo n capacit yassumin g a minimu mbe d i s maintaine d t o avoi d instantaneou s vapo r breakthrough . I hop e the enclose d informatio n wil l b e o f hel p t o yo u and t o Mr . Breton . Pleas e contac t m e i f I ca n b e o f additiona l assistance . Your s truly , CALGO NCARBO NCORPORATIO N



## htQcrua Ha l E . Moore Manager , Nationa l Account s HEM:js f attachment sP.4 4

>> 

# oo ^ 

# r

<Z > iAjk ~zYY\

—/ Sir-3 J?//H\

l^/A.



# 5~ ^-aYT/^

4.) £<&*£

c<A_^^t^ga^^^^f^^ //& ^*yy^



# n 6 

# (^Y*~^y/

^ Y /

•//c^ ' 

# cW* ^ 

# AJ^ SP.4 5

/<?j /



# 'SAG yiocs: y\sr^i j)2W~>~f

i y 

# s^c-/;^, /J -


# . ^ /

AT
. *

'/• 'P.4 6



### to/Ca/j"- (^ZL& I 

### /{fee?

^3*nj , 

# sfy~£c<%y/is**^« y^lX, jd^fc**?*'

0 j^iS^^^cJi^/£*-* > ^^2«-<> ( /?u-*£ , ^^o^ . <^y>t^7^v^v^-Ao.



# C<^>^' y^^gf <^^^Y^t

^W/LJLJ}^



# ^y£

*K. 

## £j*~ffejk

(yl^s^^r//YY£76&^-y dY^sz&c^Tu j

gfcyyyis' 

# ^1**.^.

£ -iyn^/

;£ > <l&~*t' CYT^'S- ~^> £.CTA*K 

## f(Jy c

## ^%^^<^^Tjfffz/Y^atooiCctJ&fP.4 7



# P< 7~ Y 

# ;f<~1< '°j'( 'tJLtrcJl

cVa^ CoaJf^

(f"yj ^JST^toaJrlUt

IMC ^i? i^yccc^M^-^- £T4,\.P.4 8



# c>l«Asv-Ay/h,2*. k&o 4*%4i

^r«J\ <71/YY4UKA- 

## ^>£Y**-*-z7 «P.4 9



# Tuoo fry <?£*£* SCTD' 

# isOc/v

V - cJ^^-^y-

<y^^ & ^ • * *



# • !fccc

5 

# rc /A * o f7^

S ^ '~2 1* &*x^s&Ace^jvd

J^du^

ry^L[U<KjUt(K<k<kt}v[ '/z4?,'/

f 

# ~-H\ ti ^lyte/iJaLK^

^JPttP^W-js

S/X Cstirf

<A/4 <* 4>«iJi- ,/4&* fa fcf

r*S&() Sj %/<**
. 

# .tf/Jcyn. ^ 

# iYl bfiJljoil^^?

kid K')- /t** /-'x^- , /^-^^ y>TM^-yYe//**^ 

# w-R.5 0



# CLJ o/dL- Fr*^- f\yAs<- sy^\ • 

## 7^-y/y /yM e/c . dfs/ospL

T^ <^< *k,'hZfev
^Cf<.cyu\

r^/^Y * c£ry~**^L

s&e**? 

# (AP.5 1 

# fjOO
Le o Breto n 4/30/9 1 Mfypgfi PCTATT D T O REFUELING EMISSION S TESTING (4/30/91 ) 1 ) Caniste r Purg e Rat e Figure s 1 an

d 2 (SA

E 690086 , 1969 ) ar e result s o f test s performe d byCalgon . Figur e 1 show s th e obviou s - butan e desorbe d ove r a give n tim e depend s o n purg e flo wrate . Figur e 2 show s tha t fo r a give n volum e flo wrate , th e linea r velocit yo f purg e ha s n o effec t o n th e desorption . Thi s tes t wa s performe d o n canister s o f differen t aspec t ratio s bu t equa l volumes . T o obtai n equa l volume flo wrates , th e test s wit hhighe r velocitie s use d talle r carbo n beds . Figur e 3 i s a reproductio n o f figur e 1 , i.e . a verificatio n o f th e dat a o f figur e 1 a s entere d int o Lotus . Figur e 4 present s thi s dat a a s butan e desorbe d vs . tota l purg e ai r fo r th e tw o differen t flo wrates . I t show s tha t "the linea r velocit yo f purg e ha s n o effec t o n desorption " canno t b e interprete d a s saying th e purg e rat e ha s n o effect . Fo r 20 0 Be d Volume s o f purg e air , ther e i s approximatel ya 25 % differenc e i n butan e desorbe d whe n goin g from1 0 BV/mi n t o 10 0 BV/min . Fo r a facto r o f 5 differenc e i n flow , ther e ma yonl yb e a discrepanc yo f 10 % o r less . 2 ) Caniste r Load Rat e Hydrocarbo n adsorptio n b yactivate d carbo n i s basicall ya condensatio n phenomeno n (Va n de r Waal s bonds) . I f th e evap/refue l systemwer e close d an d properl ysized , ther e woul d b e n o effluen t fromth e canister . I n actua l use , an yai r whic hi s i n th e fue l tank durin g refuelin g wil l b e "purged " throughth e canister . Sinc e th e vehicl e i s ho t befor e refueling , th e vapo r i n th e tank shoul d b e mostl ygasolin e vapor . a ) Ha l Moor e (Calgon ) say s tha t Calgon' s R& D peopl e hav e looke d a t vapo r loading rate s a t approximatel y1/ 3 an d 3 time s th e loading rat e typica l o f curren t caniste r design s fo r contro l o f diurna l vapo r an

d hav e no t statisticall ysee n an ydifferenc e i n th e activate d carbo n capacit yassuming a minimu mbe d i s maintaine d t o avoi d instantaneou s vapo r breakthrough . b ) Hassle r (Activate d Carbon . 1974 ) indicate s tha t vapo r molecule s hav e n o difficult yfinding unoccupie d site s withi n th e carbo n materia l eve n a t highflowrate s an d thi n be d depth s (a s i n a ga s mask) . c ) On e o f th e SAE paper s whic hdemonstrate s a prototyp e On
boar d systemfoun

d muc hles s H C emission s tha n expecte d (determine d b yweighin g th e caniste r befor e an d afte r refueling) . They theorize d tha t thi s i s du e t o th e fac t tha t th e temperatur e o f the incoming fue l i s muc hlowe r than th e temperatur e o f th e fuel/vapo r i n th e ga s tank , causing a significan t portio n o f th e head vapo r t o condens e an

d remai n i n th e tank .P.5 2



### Probabl y

th e pressur e dro palon g th e carbonbe dwoul dbecome a nissu e a s th e loadin g rat e increase s befor e breakthroug hwoul d b e a problem

(creating a bac kpressur e durin g refueling) . I f thi s i s true , manufacturer s woul dinadvertentl y avoi ddesign s whic h coul dno t handl e larg e loadin g rates . 3 ) othe r Issue s Sinc e th e adsorptio no f a carbo nbe ddecrease s wit hincreasin g temperature : a ) Coul da hig hloadrat e releas e a larg e amoun t o f hea t o f vaporizatio ninsid e th e caniste r ove r a shor t perio do f time , an d thereb y rais e th e temperatur e o f th e caniste r enoug hto degrad e th e performanc e o f a caniste r whic hwork s wel l fo r eva pemissions ? b ) A caniste r whic hha s a give nworkin g capacit y fo r diurna l emissions.ma y

hav e a muc hlowe r capacit y fo r refuelin g emission s i f i t i s locate dwithinth e engin e compartment , etc . Onth e othe r hand , i t ma y

hav e a mor e efficien t purge .P.5 3



### Le o Breto n 5/1/9 1 TTT.TgPHQN

E CONVERSATIO N WITH 

## i s extremel yknowledgeabl e i n th e are a o f evap/refuelin g systems . ^|^HH|^^H|H|HHHHHfl Afo r 

## detaile d questions . Th e followingiiulHfrl^Tererence^^^e^^ote s o n th e previou s page : 1 ) H e wil l revie

w|fl|HHR a n d ge t bacJ c 

## t o m e 5/1/91 . Hi s memor y wa s tha t purg e rate^^oe s no t matter , bu t think s tha t th e interpretatio n abov e ma yb e correct . H e als o sai d tha t th e purg e rat e fo r a n eva p caniste r i s approximatel y1 0 BV/mi n durin g a n LA 4 (tota l o f 20 0 BV

purge) . Acomplet e purg e i s obtaine d afte r 200
- 30 0 BV sinc e th e desorptio n rat e i s ver ylo wpas t thi s point . 2 ) c ) Sai d tha t thi s make s sens e t o hi man d sound s ver y plausible . 3 ) a ) Tol d m e tha t hig hloadin g rate s characteristi c o f refuelin g (5g/mi n a s oppose d t o 0.2g/mi n fo r evap ) wil l caus e a significan t temperatur e ris e i n a ne wcanister . A s a caniste r "ages " an d goe s throug ha numbe r o f cycles , th e "heel " whic hform s i s compose d mostl yo f hydrocarbon s wit ha larg e hea t capacit ycompare d wit hth e activate d carbon . Thi s reduce s th e workin g capacit yfo r lo w loadin g rate s bu t i s les s significan t i n hig hloadin g rate s sinc e th e heal' s hig hhea t capacit ykeep s th e caniste r coole r tha n i t woul d otherwis e be . I aske d hi mfo r therma l propert ydat a t o ge t a n estimat e o f th e expecte d temperatur e rise .

State d tha t breakthroug hca n b e measure d wit ha thermocoupl e (place d a t o r nea r outlet) . b ) Wil l as k abou t thi s today .

'tol d m e tha t h e doe s no t expec t anymanufacturer s t o use - 

## non-integrate d systems . H e expect s manufacturer s t o us e 4
- 6 lite r canister s t o handl e eva p and refuelin g emissions . I f the y onl yha d t o worr yabou t th e ne weva p requirements , the ycoul d ge t awa ywit h2. 5 lite r canisters ._P_54 ,

- I ( 1 - 10 0

PUKG C MT E (SC O VOLUMES / MiN. )

coNoirio**
. M*.»f.« * Itmi—mtmrm. * ' M r » 

### * •

X

_ L

_ L 1 0 I S 2 0 TIME-MINUTE S 2 3 z o a «

S C I > •2 4 a . < u o z Xi - o -



# t 1 

# 1 / /

1 / /

L . co«o.'.o« » 1 

# S

LINEA H VELOCIT Y c m / m m •'0 0 x6 0 0 2 3

MM>M « hi m MM.*I* » TMif*.**^. . * » >S0 0.1ft. —'«••«.•«.'. . * » >0 0 *»'• •••»• . « M MI.M
. ' »••«» ••0

1 1 ' 1 1 0 I S 2 0 TIM E - MINUTE S 2 3 J O
Fig
. \0- Working capacit y varie s wit hpurg e rat e Fig.£f - Workin gcapacity i s independen tof linearvelocit y o f purg e

•* * •I Ao o u 

## 8

T J 3 V Q V C 0 • 5 d 1 1 

## Butan e Desorbe d vs . Tim e

1 0 - 9 - fl -

• 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - C 3 - 2 - C 1 - /o o fit J ro I./IM /\ cK '

. . - or , o /3" i " ' /" ' ' '
a a a a a

0 -$——7 - ~ i r 8 

## -r 1 2 —r16 ' 2 0 24 . 2 8 Tim e (min. ) 

## fiou/C 3 ; 

## tAW/A s G^Arc, ^ ^ . /7>, t

c 

# I 0 o <j 

## 8
8 * 0 3 o 1 1 

## Butan e Desorbe d vs . Purg e Ai rVolum e

i H 0 -$— p

—

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1—~T 1 1 1 1 1 r 0I 2 0. 4 0. 6 0 8 1 1. 2 1. 4 1. 6 1. 8 (Thousands ) Purg e Ai r(Be d Volumes ) 

# /,>/ c ¥: /i* w ik^rtJL

u%. T*k(&o*ArP.5 6 

# |00O<t

Note : EOD , MOD , C D Briefin gonOnboar dRefuelin gEmissio n Contro l Tes tProcedure s <j|H'J "/» 

### A r 

### " i 

# From : Jame s D . Greaves , Mechanical Enginee rLDO^^ ^ M f 

# Standard s Developmen tandSupportBranch<# * , M 

# ^ r 

# 1\ V > ^ To : Richard"D . Lawrence , Divisio nDirecto r'I ' i^fiEngineerin gOperation s Divisio nY* ^ Standard s Developmen tandSupportBranchJ?^ \ ,\>* ir dD . Lawrence , Divisio nDirecto r*\ * Charle s N . Freed , Divisio nDirecto r Manufacturer s Operation s Divisio n RobertMaxwell , Divisio nDirecto r Certificatio nDivisio n Th eonboardrefuelin gemissio ncontro l rulemakin ggrou p i s plannin g to hol daninformational briefin gfo rrepresentative s fromth e Engineerin gOperation s Division , Manufacturers Operation s Division , andCertificatio nDivision . Th esubjecto f thebriefin gi s th etes t procedure s thatwil l b erequire ddurin gth ecertificatio nproces s fo r onboardrefuelin gemission s contro l systems . Th etentativ edateand tim efo rth ebriefin gi s Tuesday , Marc h19t hat1:00-3:00 . If

atim es*lN\ conflic tarise s pleas ele tus kno w(FT S 374-8574) . h



# C^cX^r~ . " 7P" P.5 7 

# Too l Od izj1**10 MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : Provision s of the Clea nAi r Ac t Amendments o

f 1990 Regarding Onboar

d Refuelin g Vapo r Recovery , Stage n , an

dEvaporative Emissions
. FROM : Da

nBarba, Mechanica

l Enginee r Standards Developmen

t an dSuppor t Branc h TO : Cheste

r J . France , Chie

f Standards Developmen

t an dSuppor t Branc h THRU : Glen

nW . Passavant , Senio

r Project Manage r Standards Developmen

t an dSuppor t Branc h

Fo r the pas t year , the safet

y issue s associatedwit

honboar dvapo r recover y systems have receivedminima

l attentionfromEP

Aan dothe r interestedparties , due i

npar t to the President s June 198 9 proposa l t o amen dthe Clea nAi r Act , whichincludedprovision s to require the us e o

f Stag e IIcontrol s i

nnonattainmen

t areas . However, recent

Hous e an d Senat e version s o

f the Clea nAi r Act Amendments o

f 1990 currently i

nconferenc e i

nthe 101st Congres s containprovision s requiring the us e o f onboar dvapor recover y systems t

o contro l refueling emissions
. Furthermore , statu s report s fro mWashingtonindicat

e tha t Titl e II , containing the mobile sourc e amendments , ha s jus t bee ncompletedandtha

t it closely resemble s the Hous e version
. For reference , asummar

y o f Hous e an dSenat e provision s regarding onboar drefueling vapor

recover y systems , Stage II , an

devaporative emissioncontrol s i s give

no nth e followin g pages . Althoughdetail s o

f the conferenc e agreemen

t regarding onboar

dar e incomplete , report s indicat

e tha t EP Awill againb e requiredt

o tak e aleading rol e inaddressing an d resolving the safet

y issue s associatedwit

honboar dvapo r recover y systems (see Control o

f Refueling Emissions , Hous e Section206) . Regardin g implementatio no f onboard , however, it

appears tha

t the conference too

k aconservative approach
. The conference ha s apparend y agree dto : 1 ) requir e th e Administrato

r t o promulgat

e arule requiring onboar

dwithi n1 8 month s o f CA Aenactment . 2) allow manufacture s 4 mode l years afte r promulgatio

no f th e rule t o implemen

t onboard
. 3 ) allow onboar

dt o be phasedi

nove r three yea r perio d(40% , 80% , 100%) . The conferenc e agreement s regardin g Stag e IIandevaporativ e emission s ar e unknowna

t thi s time , bu

t ar e expectedto generall

y follo w the Hous e version , thoug ha conservative implementationschedule , simila r to tha t agree dt o fo r onboard , i s probable
.P.5 8



## Control of

Vehicl eRefuelin gEmission s House (Sectio

n206)
* Al l ne wLDV s to requir eonboard . * Promulgationdue1 2 months afte rCAA enactmen t

* Ruleto tak

eeffectthreeyears afte

rpromulgation . * Captur

eefficienc y o f

95% . * Stag eI

I requiremen

ti nmoderat

enonattainment area s i s waive d uponpromulgationo f onboar d rule . Stag eI I requiremen

ti nSerious , Severe , orExtreme nonattainmentarea

s ma y b erevise d orwaive d whenAdministrato rdetermines tha tonboar d i s i n widespread use . * N o provisio nconcernin gothe rvehicl eclasses .

* Administrato rshal l determine , inconsultatio nwith theSecretar

y o f Transportation , tha

tonboar d i s saf ewithi n1 2 months o f

CA A enactmen t 

## Senat e (Sectio n203 )
* All LDV s t

o requir eonboard . * N o dat

esetfo rpromulgation . Assumedueby Decembe r31 . 1992 . * Ruleto tak

eeffectinmodel yea

r1993 . * Captur

eefficiency o f

95% . * Provisio nunderSectio n107 give s similar powe rt o administratort

o phas eoutStageII. Se e below .
Apply to othervehicl eclassification s a s early a s possible . Secretar y o f Transportationshal l completea study b y Jun

e30 , 199 1 to asses s onboar d safety . I f theSecretar

y determines onboar

d i s unsafe , th e rulegoe s int

o effectinMY 1995 instea d o f MY 1993 . Furthe

rlegislatio nma

y b epasse d t

o waiv e onboar d requiremen

twithi n1 yea

rof submissio n o f study . 

## Stag eI I Gasolin eVapo rRecover y Hous e(Sectio n103 )

* Requires StageII control s i nmoderat ean d above nonattainmentarea

s forfacilitie s dispensin gmore than10,00 0 gallon s permonth . * Statemustsubmitarevisio nto th eapplicabl e implementatio nplanwithi n2 years o f CA A enactment.

* Rul egoe s int

o effec t i ) 6 month s afte

radoptiondat

eforfacilitie s constructed afte

rCA A enactment, ii ) 1 yea rafteradoptiondat eforfacilitie s dispensin gmoretha

n10,00 0 gallon s per month , iii ) 2 yea nafte

radoptiondateforall other facilities . * Phase-outplangive ni nonboar d provision s unde

r Sectio n206 . 

## Senat e(Sectio n107 ) Requires StageI

I control s i nmoderat

ean d above nonattainmentarea

s forfacilitie s dispensin g mor etha n20,00 0 gallon s pe rmonth . Within1 yea ro f

classificatio nas anonattainment area, thestat

eshal l submitarevisio no f the implementationplan , specifyin gadatefo r implementation . Rul egoe s into effect : Within1 yearafte

rsubmissio no f

revisio no f implementatio nplan .

Administratorma

y revis eorwaiv eStag eI I requirement

s whenonboar

d i s inwidespread use .P.5 9



## Evaporativ eEmission s Hous e(Sectio n205 ) Senat e(Sectio n204) Administrato rshall promulgate , an d fro m timeto tim erevise , regulation s forevaporativ eemissio n fro m gasoline-fuele d vehicle s providin gthe greates tdegre eo f

emissio nreductionachievable . Evaporativeemissio nregulation s shal l include : (1 ) In-us eemission s (runninglosses) . (2 ) After2 day s non-us edurin gozone formin gsummertimeconditions . Rulemakingmus tbegi nwithin1 2 months o f CA A enactment . * Administratorshall promulgat eregulations for evaporativ eemissio nfro m gasoline-fuele d vehicle s providin gthegreates tdegre eo f emissio n reductio nachievable . * Evaporativeemissio nregulation s shal l includ e runninglosses .

* Nj i dat

ese tforstar

to f rulemaking .

* Fina l regulations duewithi n1 8 months o f CA A enactmen tIf

1 8 mont h deadlinei s no tme tAdmin istratormustexplai nwhy an d se tadat

ewithi n1 5 month s o f

1 8 mont h deadline . * Regulation s to tak

eeffec tas expeditiousl y as possible . * Fina l regulations duewithi n1 8 months o f CAA enactment .

* Regulation s to tak

eeffec tbeginnin ginM Y 1994 .P.6 0 

# -Foot /o/zi/90 MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : TransportationResearch Center(TRC ) Repor to nAP I Tes tVehicl e Driveabilit

y FROM : Da

nBarba , Mechanica

l Enginee r Standard s Developmentan

d Suppor tBranc h TO . GlennW. Passavant , Senio rProjec

tManage r Standard s Developmentan

d Suppor tBranc h

I nDecembe r1988 , theEXXO N Research an d Engineerin gCompan

y contracted the Transportatio

nResearc h Cente ro f Ohio to evaluat

eth edriveabilit

y o f atw o pair

s of car s (tw o For d Tauru s an d tw o BuickLeSabr

evehicles ) usingfou

rdifferen tgrades o f

gasolin e fuel . EXXON' s rea

l objective , unknow

nt o TRC , was to obtaina

nunbiased evaluationof thedriveabilit

y o f onboar d vehicle s vs . identical model non-onboard vehicles . The conclusio no f

th erepor twas tha tall testfuel s performe

d acceptably well , implyingtha tno driveabilit y problems occurre

d duet o theonboar

d systems o nth

eFor d orth eBuick . Some highlight s include : o Thetes tprocedur

econsiste d o f

subjectiveevaluatio nby testdrivers immediately followin ga3/

4 fill-up a tfourare aservicestations . Thedrivewa s approximately 15 mile s inlength . Theresult s o f thes edrives i s summarize d o npages 4 - 7 . o T o retur

nthetan kto a1/ 4 leve l forthenextfuelin gtest, amileag eaccumulation procedur ewa s used (AppendixA) , consistin go f successiv edrives aroun

d aTRC testtrac kby otherTRC personnel . Comment s fro m mileag eaccumulationdriver s wer eincluded inth

erepor ti nAppendi

xB . o Ther ewa s aproblem i ntheBuickonboar d vehicl ewhich cause d engin ebucking an d hesitatio na

tWOT . Th eproblem wa s diagnose d as adefectiv ecrankshaf t triggersensor , wa s replaced an d n o furthe

rproblems werereported . Se epage8 an d Appendi

xB Pages marked. o Vehicl e#52 9 an

d #53 1 ar eth eonboar d equipped cars .

### •'-//"' / C J / % BREAKTHROUG H 

### Assumptions : 

# <?o» 3

100 % uninsulate d tan k integrate d desig n 1 6 gallo n tan k Desig n refuelin g emission s facto r= 6. 6 g/gal 7 2 - 96° F diurna l temperatur e ris e (2 4 g/day ) Desig n safet yfacto r= 10 % 5^ » c- /U_AP/ 

### bo.cLfj±^s^-


## Genera l Equation :

# o fBreakthrough s Tot . refuelin g event s Purg e Opportunit y [ % r foccurin g clos e t o hom e (n o purge) ] Diurna l Even t [ % o fflee t experiencin g (x ) diurnals ] Refuelin g Loa d [ % fil l require d fo rbreakthrough ] 

## Calpulation ;

# ofBreakthrough s Tot . refuelin g event s 0.3 0 + + + + + 0 da y(.069 )

partia l (.431 ) 1 da y(.341 ) 2 da y(.078 ) 3 da y(.037 ) £4 da y(.046 ) X 

### x X X X X 

### r

f> 94 % (.03 ) r f> 82 % (.15 ) r f> 70 % (.42 ) r f> 46 % (.73 ) r f> 23 % (.95 ) r f> 3 % (1.0 )
0.3 0 0.34 7
# ofBreakthrough s Tot . refuelin g event s 0.10 4 

# ( fjo+rs' Us

C«.(cor(oJ-'o^P.6 2



### Yea r 198 5 198 6
199 1 Tes t Condition s

Td=8 8 ° F AT=+ 2 ° F Td=81-8 4 ° F Tt=80± 3 ° F Td=81-8 4 ° F Tt=80± 3 ° F AT.Td.RV P

2,88,11. 5 2,88, 9 (-3) , 83,11. 5 (-3),83, 9 (-7*),84M1. 5 (-7*),84*, 9 E.F
. I 7.2 6 6.0 5 7.2 9 6.0 8 7.7 6 6.5 5

* Wors t case value s

Pag e 1O l -T I > I D : >

_ *

c n N l

• C O5.6 C O

e n C D e n

e n e n e o >

T J D O

^ «f > r o - - 

### zS5co z O < m m c z < z cc z C O C O C O C O

r o -» •r o c o

A O ) C

O O l VJNI O W

_o . t D O C

O C D

C O 4* . CD 4»- r o '*» •N I e n -* •o o - *

A p> c o o i '-* '-* CD f o C O O CD C

O

C O 4* . C D .£ . r o >>. N I e n -Lo o -• • e n I 

### • n > 3 3 

# £

C O

C D r o

i 4* .6.2 C D

C D CO 0 0

C D r o C D 

### K

> T J

^ t o r o - - 

### ZW^J Z 

## OSm m c ccc C O C O C O C O

4* . r o c o 4* .

4* . C D N | 4* . -» •-« •eo c o

i -» •e n N I o

o

.£ . 4* . CD 4^

- ^ 0 0 ^ - C

O 4* . c o oo N J

*> . e n t o e n ^ N I c o i o AOlOO l

e n 4 ^ e n 4^ . e n c o ^ e o O l CA ) C O N l T I



### m C D

e n ^ eo M _, . 

### TJZ^CO Z > O ^ m m 3* (ZCCC ^ C O C O C O C O

•r*. e n c o c o e n

e n e n e n N I ^ N I -* N I &•

e n

I I I c o t o oo e n o

C D e n e n C D e n c o c o 4* . *>

•r o Ar o c o o ) e n

c o e n e n c

o e n c o c o -£ . 4* . r o A r o c o o ) e n

C D C D C D co e n r o N I '-*

•i» . eo o eo c o C D -p

*JAN



### S" * * T

> 

### ro -• • 5zWw z >C > $ m m ^ c ccc ^ C O C O C O C O

4^ . e n 4 ^ 4 ^ e n

e n e n e n e n 4^. A O A coc o

• 1 " —* • DOCOM O

c n e n e n C D 4 ^ C O N l C O N l C O co co N I c o r o

OIOICOCD A C O C O O '-* C D e o c o r o C D r o

C D e n e n C D C D O N J C

O k l '->• C O C O N l CD M O 

### m O

c n *>•<?

r o ->• 

## TJZfOco z > 0 ^ m m 

## ^ccc c ^ C O C O C O C O

4* . 4* . C

O 4* . c n

c n c n c n N I 4* . oo r o 4 ^ eo co

•ii i C D C D r o c o e n

C D A c n N I c n 4* . c o r o C D r o r o -* •4^. r o c o

C D e n e n o e n A k l WO M r o o o 4^

- o c o

C D 4^ . e n N I e n e n c o c o e n c o c o - ^ c o r o - ^ Z



# o <

c/ i 4* . wr o -« • T]Z«0O Z 

## > 0 $ m m 3 J c ccc ^ C O C O C O C O

r o e o r o c o 4 ^

C D C D C D c o e n N I e o N I eo c o

i —*• i i • -'UCnoo o

C D C D C D C O C D '->• r o co 4^

. '-* A c n - » co o
OOO)- 1 o v• ^ e n c

o co c o 4^ . C O N l C O o

C D C D C D CD C D b o r o c o 4^. '—>• CDO l - ^ C

O o 

# o

o H

c n 4* . <*

> r o - i JZ^GO Z 

### > O ^ m m 3 

## ccczc ^ C O C O c o c o

-* •r o -• •r o c o

N l N l N j CD C

D 4^. e n C D e n C D

- ^ r o c o r o co

e n C D e n N I e n c o e o c o r o c

o N I e n C D 4* . e n

C D C O N l - ^ N l C O C O !f ^ r o 4^

- N l CD N | o o

e n C D e n N I e n b o e o c o r o c o N I e n c o 4* . e n < !I0NTH

J J 

### m G >IONRVP

H O



## o H 

### mFAC HCAPIEMF 

### > J S O c o H 

### r n S m > > O H . ^



### O 

# o r - 

### OWEATHER J JEFUELI ^IGEMIS! t oONFACT0 T J C O

<C O 

### m T J

- i

c n 4* . eo ^ _,. 

## T J z c o c o z > 0 $ m m ^czczczcz ^ C O C O C O C O

• A
. —fc
. — k

_*
. 

## c o - * o - ^ r o

N l 0 0 N l C

O N l c o co c o oo r o

• 4* . C D - * N l r o

e n C D C D C D C D o '-* o e n o o> co r o AC O

_» . C D C O CD O N J Li . C O C O C O C D c o c n e o N I r o

C n C D C D C D C D o "- 1 o e n C D C D co r o 4* . co > CGUST

c n Aco M - l T|ZW0f) Z 

## > o ^ m m ^czczczcz ^ C O C O c o C O

_ L _ & — * C O o C O o - *

0 0 0 0 0 0 C

O N l coc n A-'O o

—A
. __A
. C D -» •C D C O CO

e n e n c n e n e n r o Ab N I '* . r o - ^ c o c n N I

_ i CD C O N l O 0 0 c o c o r o c o i o c o N I co r o o i

c n e n c n e n e n r o 4* . CD N l A - t o - » eo c n N I c _ C r ~

- <

c n 4^ . co r o _, . T ] Z f o c o z > Q ^m m 3>CCC C ^ C O C O C O C O

_* . _ x_* . COOCO-'- '

0 0 0 0 0 0 C

O N l C O 0 0 C O o o o

— A
. — A O C D c n C O CD

O l O l O l N l A N J r o co Li . c o c o o r o o o

_ *
_ * C D O C D - ^ C O C D L i C O C O C D r o - ^ co o N |

c n t n o i N I A N I r o c o L Ac o co o r o o o c _ C Z 

## m

c n ^ co r o - ^ 

## Tjzcoco z > O $ m m ^ccC c ^ C O C O C O C O

L i
. __!
. _f c C O - ^ o -» •-» •

N l N l C

O C O N l N l 4* . r o N l 4* .

-_*
. _ i —4
. A COOO O

* . 4^ . e n C D 4^

- c o L i r o e n 4^. c o C D 4* . c n e n

. e n N J c o o N I bo c o o e n N J -* C D C D e n ->

•

A Ac n o > A bo Li . r o e n 4^

. o o c n A c n c n S >

- <

c n 4^ . e o f o _,. 

## Tjzcoc o 2 

## > o $ m m ^ccc c ^ C O C O C O C O

L
_ 1
_ L L c o -*•o -» •r o

N l C D N | C O CD r o eo c o *» . C D

— k
__ L _*
. I O C O M N | A

C O ^ A O A b r o c n L ^ oo A r o c o r o

O l O l C

D C O CD C O A C O SC O CD C O O - ^ C

O

C O 4> - 4* . CD 4 ^ b f o b i ^ A c o 4* . r o c o r oMONTH T J 

### m 

## oION

T J < T J

H 

### o

oTEMF > 

## o H m 

## o 2 > • n j > m O c o

— 1 

## m S m > > O H 

# o

N 

# o 2 

## m 0 0EASONREFUELI 

## zGEMISS —ONFACTO T J C O 'P.6 5



### 9 •

= 3 

# Percen t o frefuelin g event s withi nspecified range

s of % fill s

_ i i i i i
_ _ j i i
_ _ i i i i i
_ 0- 5 10-1 5 20-1 9 30-3 9 «M 9 90-99 004 5 70-7 9 KHS

904 9 5-1 0 15-2 0 23-3 0 35-4 0 43-5 0 55J50 83-7 0 75- » 13-9 0 95-10 0 Percen tFill ( % o f fue l tan kcap. )



## UcM ut^ys - '7* 1 ' 8 6 A f c 

# °7c

- r.t f F.l f

# cc O hO < 

## L L 

# O C O C O L U 

# REFUELIN G EMISSIO N FACTOR S

1 1 1 0

8

-4 0 

# EP Av s CAPE-9 , T D = 79 F

EP A1 3 RV P

CAPE- 9

-3 0 -2 0 -1 0 0 1 0



# DELTA-T , DE G F 2 0 3 0 4 0

b >P.6 7

. ' SEP-03-199 1 15M 3 FRO M EP AMOBIL E SOURCE

S T

O AN N ARBO R P.0 4 

# poo* *

Sept . 3 , 199 1 

## Not e to Che t France : Attachedi s a handout that AP I gav e t o NHTSA whe nthe

y me t withCurr

y a coupl e week s ago . Dickwoul dlik e t o kno w i f w e hav e an y additiona l informatio no nthi s ne

w AP I onboard-equippedcar ? Pleas e le t m e know . Thanks . Do nZingerP.6 8



### SEP-03-199 1 15:4 2 FRO MEP AMOBIL E SOURCE S T O AN

NARBORP.0 1

UNITE D STATES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y WASHINGTON . D.C . 20460



## OFFIC E O F MOBIL E SOURCE S OFFIC E O F AIRAN D RAOIATIO N



## T O O F QM S TBAWSMTTTA L COVE RSHEE T

DAT E
FROM : MESSAGE/INSTRUCTIONS: . TELEPHON E wft » 2r*^7y ~ O^Srf 

# V NUMBE RO F PAflr.fl ; f 

## (Includin gthi s cove rsheet ) TELEPHON

E NQ » rO^OO ~ /*> Tb

### SEP-03-199 1 15-

- 4 2 FRO M -e8/29/9 1 14:1 3 EP AMOBIL ESOURCE S T O AN NARBOR 

# ^1L P.6 9



### P.0 2

ffljYQTnwftYpgsHa i IXATORgS , API/Exxo nprototyp evehicle s ca nmee tstringen temissio n standard s 

## ftPVITOH PA* A

199 1 Standard s Bas e Vehicl e Onboar d Vehicl e Regulate dEmission s

C&g / mil e 3. 4 1. 4 1. 1 HC.q / mil e 0.4 1 0.1 8 0.1 4 

## 22£x, g /mil e 1. 0 0. 4 0. 4 

## sva& g /tes t 2. 0 0. 2 0. 8 Emissio n

Unregulate d g/tes t Runnin g Losse s g/tea t
3. 1 0.0 9 Refuelin g Losses . g/tes t
4. 9 0.0 5
T*a'/u s 

## Vehicl e syste

m prototype s have desig nfeature s tha t reduc e complexity / improve safet y ris kfactor s Caniste r remove dfro

m engin e compartmen t + withi nframe Cr^ W + withi nfue l tank* • les s ris ktha nexisting 1971-199 1 vehicl e control s

TOHAMCro TVaPORATIV B COHTROI * 

## EP A proposin g enhance devaporativ e contro l syste m — fina l rul e imminen t woul drequir e enhance d(2-3x ) canister , larger-vapo r retur nlines , improvedvehicl e purg e syste m simila r t o wha t ORV

Rsystem s requir e EKistin g evaporativ e system s nave no t bee nshow nt o presen t safet y ris k

- Refuelin g caniste r woul dreceiv e - 2 o z mor e gasolin e vapo r tha nevaporative syste m 

# veaW* " «<t

y /* *P.7 0



### - -SEP-03-199 1 15=4 2FRO MEP A MOBILE SOURCE S T O AN

N ARBO RP.0 3 •' \;_-e8/2B/» l14:1 3 Q00 3 

## m

DRIVEABILITY/CnSTOHE RHAWPLIW G
9m


### o Two vehicl e test s mad e vi a independen t contracto r

Coo l temperatur e condition s - 4O'F , Harysville , Ohi o

- Warm

temperatur e condition s - 95°F , SanAntonio , T X
o Contractor s tol dtha t gasolin e brandcomparison s wer e bein g mad e

- 2 matche dpair s o f vehicles , wit handwithou t refuelin g system Tes t trac kandurban/suburba nroute s
o N o difference s observe dbetwee nvehicle s R8C0MM8WPATI0 W
o Followin g 9/2 6 Publi c Meeting , EP A 

### andDOT/NHTS A



### g o forwar d wit hpropose dORV R

### rul e wor kwit haut o manufacturer s t o resolv e safet y concern s brin g ORV

Rsystem s int o productio ni n199 6 o Simila r t o recommendatio nmad e i nGA O report , andi nReill y - Skinne r communicatio n

# \h*-h* P.7 1 

# ?c>oy
NOTE : SUBJECT : TO : FROM : THRU : 

## API/Exxo n Prototyp e Onboar d Vehicle s

Richar d D . Wilson , Directo r Offic e o f Mobil e Source s Da n Barba , Mechanica l Enginee r Da*\ nn^JU^. Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h Cheste r J . France , Ch i Standard s Developmen t Suppor t Branc h Thi s respond s t o you r reques t fo r additiona l informatio n o n th e API/Exxo n prototyp e onboar d vehicles . Th e AP I vehicle s referre d t o i n th e tw o pag e handou t whic hAP I provide d t o NHTS A during thei r recen t meetin g ar e improve d version s o f th e earlie r AP I prototyp e onboar d vehicles : a 198 7 Buic k LeSabr e an d a 198 8 For d Taurus . Thes e improve d vehicle s wer e th e subjec t o f an SA E technica l pape r (SA E # 900155 ) release d i n lat e 1990 , an d therefor e canno t b e considere d "new " vehicles . Althoug hinformatio n o n th e improve d AP I prototype s ha s bee n availabl e t o th e publi c fo r severa l months , th e vehicle s wer e no t mentione d i n th e recen t NHTS Asafet ystudy . Earlie r version s o f th e prototypes , whic hreveale d seriou s finabilit y an d driveabilit yproblem s unde r hig hambien t temperatur e condition s i n roa d test s conducte d b yNHTSA , wer e discusse d i n th e A.D . Littl e repor t an d th e recen t NHTS Areport . Th e principa l featur e o f th e improve d design i s locatio n o f th e caniste r withi n th e vehicl e frame . Th e Tauru s caniste r i s locate d i n a simila r positio n t o EPA' s prototyp e Taurus , withi n th e U-shape d subframe whic hsupport s th e rea r contro l arms . Th e Buic k prototyp e incorporate s th e caniste r int o th e design o f th e fue l tank itself . T o ou r knowledge , th e Buic k i s th e firs t prototyp e t o demonstrat e placemen t o f th e caniste r "within " th e fue l tank (se e attached) . Suc ha locatio n reduce s fue l tank capacit y( 5 liter s i n thi s case) , bu t tend s t o reduc e concer n regarding cras hsafet yo f large r canisters . I t woul d b e har d t o argu e tha t a caniste r holdin g a fewounce s (10 0 o r s o gram s o f vapor ) o f fue l present s an ysignifican t increas e i n fir e ris k nex t t o 2 0 gallon s o f fue l i n th e fue l tank . A s i n earlie r AP I versions , emission s ar e controlle d using a liqui d sea l simila r t o tha t use d o n th e EP Aprototyp e excep t tha t productio n fillpipe s wer e used .

# r P.7 2



## Th e driveabilit ytest s mentione d i n th e handou t wer e performe d b ySouthwes t Researc hInstitut e (SWRI ) an d ar e discusse d i n detai l i n a repor t prepare d fo r Exxo n entitled , "Driveabilit y Tes t fo r Difference s i n Brande d Gasolines. " Th e test s wer e designe d t o hel p addres s NHTSA' s concern s abou t driveabilit y an d finabilit yi n hig hambien t temperatur e conditions , a key issu e i n NHTSA' s assessmen t o f prototyp e developmen t i n thei r safet ystudy . SWR I testin g reveale d n o driveabilit yo r finabilit yproblems . A s pointe d ou t i n th e AP I handout , SWR I wa s tol d tha t gasolin e brand comparison s wer e bein g mad e i n orde r t o hel p ensur e tha t result s wer e no t biased . Th e emission s dat a provide d i n th e AP I handou t wer e result s fro mtest s conducte d o n th e 198 8 Tauru s prototyp e (as yo u noted ) an

d ar e identica l t o tha t reporte d i n SAE ' Pape r No . 900155 . Th e test s simpl ydemonstrat e tha t th e system s can , according t o thei r testing , pas s curren t refuelin g tes t procedur e a s wel l a s tailpip e and evaporativ e emissio n standards . Althoug hemission s test s suc ha s thes e d o no t directl yaffec t safet yissues , the yd o showtha t th e prototyp e operate s a s intende d withou t adversel yeffecting othe r emissio n contro l systems .P.7 3



### Figur e 7 

## Buic k LeSabre Caniste ran d Fue l Tan k

Placin g th e caniste r insid e th e fue l tan kfo r th e Buic kLeSabr e wa s accomplishe d b y dissectin g on e corne r o f th e fue l tan ka s show ni nFigur e 7 . Th e fue l tankwa s reseale db

y weldin g plate s t o th e cu t section s o f th e tank . Th e cu t plane s wer e determine ds o tha t th e desire dL/ 0 o f 2. 5 wa s maintaine dan

ds o tha t th e productio n tan krestrainin g stra ppasse dunde r th e canister . Th e caniste r wa s connecte dt o th e fue l tan kwit hmountin g brackets . Th e Buic k caniste r is , o f course , fo r a researc h demonstratio nvehicle . I nproduction , th e fue l tan kan

dcaniste r coul db e forme d together , lik e th e fue l tan kcontour s whic h allow th e exhaus t pip e t o pas s essentiall y throug hth e fue l tank . Th e G . T . Product s rollove r valv e wa s use dfo r th e Buic ka s well . PURG E SYSTE M

- Th e canister s ar e purge d wit hai r i

nth e directio nopposit e t o th e adsorptio no f hydrocarbon s (countercurrent) . Th e purg e contro l system , includin g purg e contro l valves , purg e contro l orifice , purg e lines , etc. , wer e standar dproductio n component s fo r al l vehicles . I nbot hth e Fordan dth e Buick , th e compute r control s th e percen t o f th e time th e purg e contro l valv e i s open . I nth e Buic kproduction , th e purg e system introduce s th e purg e vapor s t o th e intak e manifol dthroug ha porte dopenin g a t th e throttl e valve . Thi s mean s tha t a t smal l throttl e openings , ther e i s littl e o r n o purge . Ther e i s als o a 0.07 8 inc horific e betwee nth e purg e contro l valv e an dth e porte dopenin g t o th e manifold . I nth e pro ductio nFord , purg e vapor s ar e feddirectl y t o th e intak e manifol dwel l downstrea m o f th e throttl e valv e vi a th e PC V system . Th e Buic kstart s t o purg e on e minut e afte r th e engin e ha s starte dan dth e Ford Tauru s start s t o purg e afte r 3 minute s 2 5 seconds . Th e productio nvapo r lin e fro m the tan kt o th e productio nevaporativ e

caniste r fo r bot hvehicle s wa s use da s the purg e lin e t o the refuelin g canister . Th e purg e contro l system fo r th e Dodg e i s describe dinth e previou s wor k(2) . A s ca nbee nsee ni nTabl e 3 , th e purg e rat e fo r th e FordTauru s wa s 11. 0 1p m at al l constan t speed s abov e 2 5 mp han daverage d 4. 5 1p m ove r on e LA- 4 drivin g cycle . Th e Fordproductio ncompute r maintain s a constan t purg e rat e ove r al l mode s o f opera tion . Thi s resulte di n3 5 gram s o f H C being purge dfro

m caniste r saturatio nove r on e LA-4 . Th e Buic kproductio npurg e contro l system di dno t maintai na constan t purg e rat e ove r al l mode s o f operation . Th e productio nBuic kLeSabr e average d1. 9 1p m an dpurge donl y

1 1 gram s H C ove r on e LA- 4 drivin g cycle . Thi s i s adequat e fo r th e curren t evaporativ e tes t procedur e bu t no t fo r Procedure s A

o r B . Therefore , fo r th e Onboar dBuick , th e porte dpurg e openin g a t th e throttl e plat e wa s move dfurthe r down stream directl y

t o th e intak e manifold . Th e compute r the nmaintaine da constan t purg e rat e abov e 4 0 mphan ddurin g accelerations . Th e purg e rat e increase dt o 13. 4 1p m v s 1. 2 lp m a t 5 0 mph. Ove r on e LA-4 , th e purg e average d4. 2 lp

m an dremove d3 4 gram s HC . A s wil l b e see nlater , th e exhaus t emission s wer e no t affected . RESULT S REFUELINGEMISSION S - Bette r tha n98 % contro l o f refuelin g emission s wa s achieve d wit hbot hvehicles . Thi s i s th e same leve l o f contro l a s wa s measure dinth e 198 6 study . Th e dat a i s summarize di nFigur e 8 . Th e baselin e an

dth e controlle drefuelin g emission s fo r th e Buic kLeSabr e ar e give ni n Tabl e A2 . Th e baselin e an dth e controlle d refuelin g emission s fo r th e For dTauru s ar e give ninTabl e A3 . Onth e 9 RVP fuel , bot h th e Buic kandth e For daverage d0.0 5 grams / gallo no r 98.9 % control . Th e propose d refuelin g standar di s 0. 1 grams/gallon . O n th e 10. 5 RV P fuel , bot hvehicle s average d 0.0 2 gram s HC/gallo no r abou t 99.6 % control . Sinc e th e degre e o f contro l o nbot hfuel s wa s high , an

dth e variatio nbetwee nrun s approache dth e limit s o f measurement , th e differenc e i s no t significant . (The percen t contro l i s base donth e baselin e refueling emission s andno t o nth e loadin g onth e caniste r whic hwa s higher. ) Spitbac kwa s no t notice dupo nth e automati c nozzl e shut-off .P.7 4 

### <% 00 )



## TO : Loi s Platt e FROM : C.E . Lindhjem DATE : Jun e 24 , 199 1 SUBJECT : Averag e Fil l Leve l Th e averag e fil l leve l can b e base d o n differen t criteria . Th e MOBILE4. 0 averag e fil l leve l o f approximatel y54.5 % wa s base d o n th e population . Ou r analysi s indicate s tha t th e averag e fil l leve l base d upo n emission s o f pas s an d fai l vehicle s i s 57.5 % an d 55.1 % respectively . Dependin g upo n whethe r pas s o r fai l vehicle s dominat e overal l emission s dictate s whic haverag e fil l leve l shoul d b e used . cc . R . Rykowsk i C . Shi h

# Km.

*\ -&** 

# ? P.7 5 

## "Zoo i & UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5
OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N 

# JU N 2 0198 9
Dr . J.J . Li u Nationa l Highwa yTraffi c Safet yAdministratio n 40 0 7t hStreet , S W Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea r Dr . Liu : Ne wcopie s o f the table s yo u requeste d fromEPA' s onboar d refuelin g briefin g i n An n Arbo r ar e enclosed . Pleas e not e tha t Tabl e 2 ha s bee n update d du e t o mino r error s foun d i n th e table . Afte r reviewin g th e dat a w e recorded , w e sawmino r error s i n som e o f th e entrie s in Tabl e 2 an d note d tha t no t al l test s had bee n included . Du e t o th e shor t tim e fram e betwee n vehicl e testin g an d the briefing , w e di d no t hav e acces s t o al l th e individua l dat a sheets . I n orde r t o tabulat e th e dat a fo r th e briefing , w e use d approximation s fo r som e o f th e entrie s o f Tabl e 2 . A s yo u wil l not e whe n examinin g th e update d version , al l the change s wer e minor . Ther e ar e n o change s i n Tabl e 1 o r Tabl e 3 , bu t ne wcopie s ar e enclose d a s yo u requested . I f yo u hav e an ymor e questions , fee l fre e t o cal l me a t (313 ) 668-4496 .

y~~\ 

## Sincerely , 

# t j/y^4u^^* —. John F/'Anderson , Senio r Projec t Manage r Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h Enclosur e 7212 WEvaporative . TaiTpip e an d Refuelin g !Bfa ! Summar y- 198 8 Tauru s Test , Vehicl < Vehicl e Configuratio n Tes t

Procedur e Tailpip e Emission s Evaporativ e Emission s Tota l Refuelin g Evap
. Emission s H C CO NO x60-84° F (g/mile ) (g/mile ) (g/mile ) (g ) Ho t Soa k 01,72-96° F #2,72 0 -96° F (g ) (g ) (g ) (g/gal ) MP G Stoc k 198 8 Mode l Yea r Cert . 0.1 9 1.8 8 0.7 1 0.12(0iurnal ) 0.2 2 0.3 4 21.4 7 Stoc k
Stoc k Supplementa l NPR M (N o ca premoved ) Supplementa l NPR H 0.2 0
0.2 3 2.1 1 0.7 6

2.6 4 0.7 4 0.1 8
0.1 4 0.1 8

0.4 0 (0.25) * 0.1 6

0.1 7 2.6 8 2.4 5

(Diurnal ) 8.2 7 8.6 7 (Diurnal ) 20.7 7
20.9 2
Wit h3.0 L Supplementa l NPR H 0.2 0 2.2 8 0.7 6 0.4 8 Wit h3.0 L Supplementa l NPR H 0.2 0 2.1 6 0.7 0 0.3 9 0.9 6 (0.69) * 0.7 2 (0.40) ' 0.4 3

0.3 8 0.4 9 1.4 5

(Diurnal ) 0.3 6 1.0 8 (Diurnal ) 21.0 5 21.0 1

Tw o prod , cansiter s inserie s Supplementa l NPR H 0.2 3 2.3 0 0.7 1 0.2 9 0.8 7 (0.70) " 0.3 9 0.2 1 1.0 8 (Diurnal ) 21.2 0

3.0 L Ca n 1/8 " PL " (Simulate d Refueling ) Supplementa l NPRM 0.2 0 2.0 8 0.5 7 0.25(Diurnal ) 0.6 2 (0.33) ' 0.8 7 0.2 2 21.3 2

3.5 t Can . 1/4 " PL " (Simulate d Refueling ) Supplementa l NPR M 0.1 8 1.6 5 0.7 7 0.49(Diurnal ) 0.8 1 (0.33) ' ).3 0 0.0 3 21.2 1

3.5 L Can . 1/4 " Pf * (Simulate d Refueling ) Supplementa l NPR H 0.1 8 1.5 6 0.7 8 0.62(Diurnal ) 0.7 4 (0.38) ' 1.3 6 0.1 0 21.3 2

3.5 L Can . 3/8 " PL" " (Simulate d Refueling ) Supplementa l NPRM 0.1 9 1.7 4 0.7 2 0.34(0iurnal ) 1.2 9 (0.98) ' 1.6 3 0.0 7 20.9 0

Value s i n parenthese s ar e approximat e ca p remova l contributio n t o total
. N D = No t Detectable
. Purg e Lin e (PL) , interio rdiamete rTabl e 1 Evaporative . Tailpip e an dRefuelin g Dat a Summar y - 198 8 Tauru s Tes t Vehicl t Vehicl e Tes t Configuratio nProcedur e Tailpip e Emission s Evaporativ e Emission s Tota l Refuelin g Evap . Emission s H C C O NO x60-8 4 ° F (g/mile ) (g/mile ) (g/mile ) (g ) Ho t Soa k#I,72-96° F #2,72 0 -96" F (g ) (g ) (g ) (g/gal ) MP G Integrated System"" " (3. 5 L Can. ) Supplementa l NPR M 0.1 9 1.8 0 0.7 2 0.2 7 0.3 4 (ND) « 0.6 1 0.0 4 20.7 0

Integrated Syste m (3. 5 L Can. ) Supplementa l NPRH 0.1 7 1.6 6 0.6 5 0.3 0 0.3 5 (ND) " 0.6 5 0.0 2 20.9 1

Integrated Syste m (3. 5 L Can. ) Supplementa l NPR H 0.2 0 2.1 0 0.7 1 0.3 6 0.2 5 (0.04) ' 0.6 1 0.07"** * 21.1 7

Integrated Syste m (3. 5 L Can. ) Suplementa l NPR H 0.1 8 1.7 2 0.7 6 0.3 4 0.3 8 (0.02) ' 0.7 2 0.0 7 21.2 5

*" * Caniste r no t disconnecte dprio r t o fuelin g fo r hea t build . ••* " 4gp

m refuelin g rat eTabl e 2 InHous e Testin g o f Curren t Refuelin g System s

Vehicl e Dat e Flowrat e (GPM ) Fue l Temp .



## tm RV

P Comment s 198 8 Onboar d Vehicl e (For dTaurus ) 4/14/8 9

3/22/8 9 1 5

1 0 98.4° F 10. 8 -Prematur e shu t of f @ 1.7 5 gal . 4/13/8 9 4/13/8 9 3/22/8 9 3/17/8 9 3/16/8 9 3/22/8 9 1

5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 2 89.2° F

85° F 76° F 60° F 62° F 76 ° 11. 2

11. 5 13. 8 13. 5 14. 3 13. 8 -Norma l

-Norma l -Norma l -Norma l -Norma l -Norma l fill .

Fill . fill . fill . fill . fill . 76° F 13. 8 -Norma l fill .
198 8 For d lauru s (Stock ) 4/14/8 9 1 5 98.4° F 10. 8 - 2 dro pspitbac k@ 2n dshutoff . 4/13/8 9 4/13/8 9 3/22/8 9
3/22/8 9 3/22/8 9 1

5 1 5 1 5
1 2 1 0 89.1° F

85° F 76° F
76° F 76° F 11. 2

11. 5 13. 8
13. 8 13. 8 - 2 tablespoo nspitbac ka t 2n dshut-off . -1/ 8 cu pspitbac ka t 2n

dshut-off . -Fe w drop s fle

w ou t durin g fueling .

- 1 teaspoo nspitbac ka t firs t shut-off . -Norma l fill . -Norma l fill .

198 7 Plymout h Relien t 4/14/8 9

4/13/8 9
4/13/8 9 1 5

1 5
1 5 92.9° F 10. 8 - 3 t o 4 teaspoonspitbac k@ 2n dshutoff . -1/ 8 cu

pspitbac kat 3rdshut-off . 89-90° F

85° F 11. 2

11. 5 -Teaspoo nspitbac ka t 2n dshut-off . -1/ 8 cu

pspitbac ka t 3r

dshut-off .

- 3 teaspoo nspitbac ka t 2ndshut-otf . -1/ 8 cu pspitbac kat 3r

dshut-off .Tabl e 2 continue d
I nHous e Testin g o f Curren t Refuelin g System s

Vehicl e Pat e Flowrat e Fue l Temp . RV P (GPM ) Lff J(psi ) Comment s

198 9 Buic k Centur y 4/13/8 9 1 5 89-90° F 11. 2 -Prematur e shut-off s unti l nozzl e pulle d ou t abou t a ninch . -Sligh t sprayin g o f fue l durin g fill . -Targ e spitback s a t al l 3 shut-offs .
198 7 Buic k Centur y 3/22/8 9

3/22/8 9
3/22/8 9 15

1 2
1 0 75° F 13. 8 -Prematur e shut-off s every tent ho f a gallo nfo r firs t 6 gallon . Pulle dnozzl e ou t siightl y

t o fil l . -1/ 8 cupspitback s a t las t thre e shut-offs . 75° F

75° F 13. 8

13. 8 -Prematur e shut-off s every hal f gallon . -N o spitback . -Norma l Fill , 198 7 Chevrole t Nov a 3/22/8 9

3/22/8 9
3/22/8 9 15

1 2
1 0 74° F 13. 8 -Prematur e shut-off s a t every hal f gallon . -N o spitback . 74° F 13. 8 -Prematur e shut-off s a t every hal f gallon . -N o spitback . 73° F 13. 8 -Norma l f ill.

198 8 Chevrole t 150 0 Pic ku

p 3/22/8 9
3/22/8 9 1 5

1 2 74° F

75 ° 13. 8 -Prematur e shut-off s every hal f gallon . -N o spitback . 13. 8 -Norma l fill .

704/ WTabl e 3 VEHICLE : TES T PROCEDURE :

Dat e Statior 4/12/8 9 Amoc o

(Zeeb&

4/13/8 9 Amoc o

(Zeeb& i

194 )

194 ) 198 8 Tauru s (Onbo a Refuelin g a t Connie Dispensin g Disp e Rat e Fu e (gpm ) Temp . 10. 2 46. 6 (Onboard ) 10. 1 46. 6 (Stoc kTauru s

- 1988 ) 10. 2 46. 6 (Stoc kBuic k (Century

- 1989 ) 10. 2 46. 6 (Stoc kRelian t K- 1987 )

10. 3 45. 8 (Onboard ) 10. 2 45. 8 (Stoc kTauru s

- 1988 ) 10. 3 45. 8 (Stoc kBuic k Centur y

- 1989 ) 10. 2 45. 8 (Stoc kPlymout h R e l idii t K- I'm/ ) rd ) an dStoc kV

c rcia l Fue l Stat i

nsed 1 RV P (°F 1 losi !

11. 9

11. 9

11. 9

11. 9

11. 4

11. 4

11. 4

11. 4 chicle s a s

on s

Nozzl e Husky 1 • X Husky 1 • X

Husky 1 + X

Husky 1 + X

Husky 1 • X Husky 1 • X

Husky 1 • X

Husky 1 + X Ident i fied

Ambien t Temp . <°F ) 40. 5

40. 5

40. 5

40. 5

46. 9

46. 9

46. 9

46. 9 Initia l

Fue l i n Tank(gal ) Unde r 1/ 8 tan k Unde r 1/ 8 tan k

Unde r 1/ 8 tan k

Unde r 1/ 8 tan k

1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tan k 1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tan k
1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tan k

1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tan k Initial /

Fina l Tan

k Temp . (°F ) __/_ _

—— / —

__/ —

__/_ _

— / — __/_ _

- / - Volum e

Dispense d (gal ) 13.5 4

12.3 3

14.0 7

9.8 7

11.6 6

10.4 3

13.2 5

10.2 2 Observation s

N o fuelin g problems .

N o fuelin g problems .

1/ 8 cu pspil l @ 2n

dnozzl e shut-off . 3rdshut-of f no t performed .
1 0 dro pspi t @ 2n dnozzl e shut-off .

N o fueling problems .

N o fuelin g problems .

2 dro pspi t @ 1st nozzl e shut-off . 1/ 8 cu pspil l @ 2n dnozzl e shut-off . 3r d nozzl e shut-off , clean . 3 t o 4 teaspoo nspil l @ 2ndnozzl e shut-off . 1 5 dro pspi t @ 3rdnozzl e shut-off .VEHICLE : TES T PROCEDURE : 198 8 Tauru s (Onboard ) an dStoc kVehicle s a s Identifie d Refuelin g a t Commercia l Fue l Station s

Qa±e_ Station Dispensin g Dispense d Rat e Fue l RVP ' (gpm ) Temp , (°F ) (psi ) Nozzl e Initia l Initial / Volum e Ambien t Fue l i nFina l TankDispense d Temp . (°F ) Tank , (gal ) Temp . (°F ) (gal ) Observations- . 4/11/8 9 Amoc o 11. 9

(Jackso n(Onboard ) & Stadium ) 45. 5 11. 5 OP W 36. 2 1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tan k 51/41. 5 12.4 4 N o fuelin g problems .

11. 9 45. 5 (Stoc kPontia c 600 0 - 1989 ) 11. 5 OP W 36. 2 1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tan k 11.7 2 Tw o immediat e prematur e nozzl e shut-offs . 1/ 2 cu p spil l @ 3rdnozzl e shut-off .
4/11/8 9 Amoc o

(Zee bi. 194 ) 10. 4

(Onboard ) 47. 8 11. 8 Hush y 1 + X 45. 1 1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 53.5/43. 5 11.6 2 Prmatur e nozzl e shut-of f tan kg 7. 8 gal. 10. 4 47. 8 (Stoc kFord Crow nVictori a -1987 ) 11. 8 Husk y 1 • X 45. 1 1/ 4 t o 3/ 8 tan k 11.6 8 On e immediat e shut-of f wit hnozzl e full y inserted . No fuelin g problem s wit hnozzl e withdraw

n1/ 4 inch throughthre e nozzl e shut-offs .VEHICLE :

TES T PROCEDURE : 198 8 Tauru s (Onboard ) an dStoc kVehicle s a s Identifie d Refuelin g at Commercia l Fue l Station s

Qale_ Station Dispensin g Dispense d Rat e Fue l RVP (9PWI ) Temp . (°F ) (psi ) Nozzl e Ambien t Temp . (°F ( Initia l

Fue l in Tan k(gal ) Initial /

Fina l Tan

k Temp . (°F ) VoTum e

Dispense d (gal ) Observation s 4/10/8 9 Sunoc o 10. 8

(Carpente r & (Onboard ) Michiga nAve ) 46. 5

10. 8 46. 5 (Stoc kPontia c 600 0 - 1989 ) 12. 8 OP W II A 40. 5 1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tan k 44.5/44. 5

12. 8 OP W

H A 40. 5 1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tank 12. 0 N o fuelin g problems .

12. 7 Tw

o immediat e prematur e shut-off s wit hnozzl e full y inserted . Prematur e shut-of f @ 4. 1 ga l wit hnozzl e withdraw n 1/ 4 inch . 1/ 8 cu pspil l @ 3rdnozzl e shut-off . 10. 8 46. 5 (Stuc kBuic k Centur y

- 1989 . Fue l tan

kdrai n inplace. ) 12. 8 OPW II A 40. 5 1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tank 10. 9 On e immediat e nozzl e shut-off . Nozzl e withdraw

n1/ 4 inch . 1 0 dro pspil l @ 1s

t nozzl e shut-off . 1/ 4 cu pspil l @ 2n dnozzl e shut-off . 3rdshut-of f not performed .

-3 -VEHICLE :

TES T PROCEDURE : 198 8 Tauru s (Onboard ) an dStoc kVehicle s a s Identifie d Refuelin g a t Commercia l Fue l Station s

Gdie
_ Station Dispensin g Rat e (gpm ) D i spense d

Fue l Temp . (°F ) RV P (psi ) Nozzl e Ambien t Temp . CF ) Initia l

Fue l in Tan k(gal ) Initial /

Fina l Tan

k Temp . CF I Volum e

Dispense d (gal ) Observations. . 4/7/8 9 Amoc o 10. 1

(Zee b& 194 ) (Stoc kBuic k

Centur y

- 1989 . Fue l tan

kdrai n inplace ) Husky 1 • X 4 ) 1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tan k -/ — 11. 6 5 t o 6 teaspoo nspil l 9 1s t nozzl e shut-off . 2nd and3r dshut-off s no t performed .
9. 8 (Onboard ) 48. 9 Husky I + X 48. 2 66.5/52. 5 10.2 5 N o fueling problems .
9. 6 48. 9 (Stoc kChrysle r mini-va n- 1988 )

9. 6 48. 9 (Stoc kBuic k Centur y

- 1989 . Fue l tan

k drai nremoved ) Husky 1 + X

Husky 1 • X 48. 2

48. 2 1/ 8 t o 1/ 4

tan k

1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tan k — / — 11.9 5 5 to 1 0 dro pspi t bac k@ 1s t nozzl e shut-off . 2n d and3r

dshut-off s no t performed . 10. 7 Tw

o immediat e prematur e nozzl e shut-off s wit h nozzl e full y

insterted . N o fueling problem s wit h nozzl e retracte d1/ 4 inch , throug hthre e nozzl e shut-offs .
4/10/8 9 Standar d

(Washtena

w & Owendale ) 11. 6

(Onboard ) 41. 3 12. 0 Emc o Wheato n A200 1 30. 8 1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tan k 53/ — 11. 2 Prematur e nozzl e shut-off s £ 2. 4 and3. 6 gallons . 2 0 dro pspil l @ 1s t nozzl e shut-off . 11. 6 41. 3 (Stoc kChrysle r mini-va n- 1988 ) 11. 6 41. 3 (Stoc kBuic k Century

- 1989 . fue l tan

kdrai n i nplace . 12. 0

12. 0 Emc o

Wheaton A200 1 30. 8 1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tan k 13.2 6 Prematur e nozzl e shut-of f £ 4. 4 gal .

Emc o Wheato n A200 1 30. 8 1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tan k — / _ 14.2 6 1/ 4 cu pspil l @ 1s t nozzl e shut-off . 2n

dan d3r d shut-off s no t performed .VEHICLE : TEST PROCEDURE :

Dat e Station 4/bWi Amoc o (Zeeb & 194 ) 198 8 Tauru s

Refuelin

g a t Dispensin

g Rat e (gpm ) 10. 7 (Onboard ) (Onboard ) an d Commercia l F Dispense d Fue l lemp . (°F ) 49. 4
10. 3 49. 4 (Stock Chrysle r mini-van - 1988 ) 10. 6 49. 4 (Stock Buick Centur y- 1989 ) Stock Vehicle s a s ue l Station s
RV P (psi ) Nozzl e 11.8/11. 8
11.8/11. 8

11.8/11. 8 Husk

y 1 + X Husk y 1 + X
Husk y 1 • X Ident i fie

d

Amb i Temp . 4 5
4 5

4 5 en t ("F ) Initia l

Fue l i n Tan k (gal ) 4. 0
1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tan k
1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 tan k Initial /

Fina l Tan

k Temp . CF )

__/_ .
__/_ _ Volume

Dispense d (gal ) 10.3 5
10.9 5

12.5 8 Observation s

Prematur e nozzl e shut-of f @ 1.2 6 gal . N o fuelin

g problems .

1/ 4 cu p spil l f

? secon d nozzl e shut-off .

4/6/8 9 Mobi l 10. 4

(Zeeb & 194 ) (Onboard ) 48. 2 13 . N o Nam e 52. 6 4. 0 63/53. 5 10. 0 N o fuelin g problems .
10. 4 48. 2 (Stock Chrysle r mini-van - 1988 )

10. 4 48. 2 (Stock Buick Centur y- 1989 ) 13. 1 No Name 52. 6

13. 1 No Nam

e 52. 6 1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 —/ — tan k 10.6 5 Five immediat e prematur e nozzl e shut-off s wit h nozzl e fullyinserted . N o fuelin

g problems when nozzl e retracte

d b y1/ 4 inch . 1/ 8 t o 1/ 4 —/ — tan k 11. 2 1/ 2 cu p spil l at 1s t nozzl e shut-off . 2n d an d 3r d shut-off s no t performed .VEHICLE :

TES T PROCEDURE : 198 8 Tauru s (Onboard ) an dStoc kVehicle s a s Identifie d Refuelin g a t Commercia l Fue l Station s


### (kie
_ Station Dispensin g Dispense d Rat e Fue l RVP 

### Lgpffl JTemp . l°f\

(psi ) Nuzzl e Ambien t 

### Temp . CF ) Initia l

Fue l in 

### Tan k(gal ) Initial /

Fina l Tank 

### Temp . (°F ) Volum e

Dispense d 

### Leal ) Observation s 3/30/8 9 Sunoc o 11. 6

(Carpente r & (Onboard ) Michiga nAve. ) 4 7 13. 1 OPW IIA 48. 2 3. 0 59.5/50. 5 11.7 6 N o fuelin g problem s throug h3 nozzl e shut-offs . 11. 6 4 7 (Stoc kTauru s

- 1988 )

4 7 (Stoc kBuic k Centur y

- 1989 ) 13. 1

13. 1 OPW

IIA

OPW IIA 48. 2 4. 0

48. 2 3. 0 12.8 2 3 dro pspil l £ 2n dnozzl e shut-off . 2 teaspoo n spi11 9 3rdnozzl e shut-off . 11.9 2 Woul dno t fue l a t highes t

andmiddl e nozzl e flo w rat e settings . 2n dan d 3r dnozzl e shut-off s a t highes t nozzl e setting s no t performed . 3/31/8 9 Standar

d (Washtena

w & Owendale ) 11. 9 43. 3

(Onboard )
11. 9 43. 3 (Stoc kTaurus

- 1988 ) 12. 0 Emc o Wheaton A200 1 35. 5 3. 0 43/4 9 10.6 8 Prematur e nozzl e shut-of f (3 6. 9 gallons .
12. 0 Emc o

Wheato n A200 I 35. 5 4. 0 12.5 3 N o fuelin g problems .

11. 9 43. 3 (Stoc kBuic k Centur y

- 1989 ) 12. 0 Emc o Wheaton A200 1 35. 5 3. 0 12.4 3 1/ 2 pin t spil l £ firs t nozzl e shut-off . 2n d& 3rdshut-off s no t performed .

-b-VEHICLE : IES I PROCEDURE : 198 8 Tauru s (Onboard ) an dStoc kVehicle s a s Identifie d Refuelin g a t Commercia l Fue l Station s

Dat e Statio n Dispensin g Oispense dInitia l Initial / Rat e Fue l RV P Ambien t Fue l inFina l Tank (gpm ) Temp . CF ) LPS. UNozzl e Temp . CF ) Tank(gal ) Temp . i°n Volum e Dispense d (gal ) Observation s 3/28/8 9 Amoc o 11. 2 52. 5

(Plymout hRd.)(Onboard )

(11. 9 stoc k52. 5 vehicl e - 198 8 Taurus ) 12.0/ - tmc o Wheato n 12.0/ — Emc o Whea t o n 63. 4
63. 4 3. 0

3. 0 64/54. 4 10.7 5 N o fuelin g problems .

64/54. 4 10.7 5 Tw o dro pspi t fro

m stoc k vehicl e 9

2n dnozzl e shut-off . 3/28/8 9 Shel l 11. 0

(Plymout h Rd.XOnboard ) 50. 4

11. 0 50. 4 (Stoc kTaurus ) 13.1/13. 0 OPW
13.1/13. 0 OP

W 69. 6

69. 6 3. 0

3. 0 68/53. 5

68/53. 5 12. 0

12. 0 N o fueling problems .

N o fuelin g problems .

3/28/8 9 Shel l

(Stadiu m & Maple ) 7. 2

(Onboard ) 50. 2
(9. 1 stoc k vehicl e - 198 8 Taurus ) 50. 2 12.6/ — 66. 1 3. 0 74/5 6 13. 0
12.6/ — 66. 1 3. 0 74/5 6 13. 0 N o fueling problems .
N o fueling problems .

3/30/8 9 Amoc o 11. 4

(Plymout hRd.XOnboard ) 5 4 Emc o Wheato n 39. 7 3. 0 53/4 8 11.7 6 3 dro pspil l 9 3r dnozzl e shut-off . 11. 2 5 4 (Stoc kTauru s

- 1988 ) Emc o Wheato n 39. 7 4. 0 10.3 3 N o fuelin g problem s throug h3 nozzl e shut-offs . 11. 3 5 4 (Stoc kBuic k Centur y - 1989 ) Emc o Wheato n 39. 7 3. 0 14.0 0 4 t o 5 teaspoonspil l 9 1s t nozzl e shut-off . 1/ 4 pin t spil l 9

2n dnozzle . N o 3r dshut-of f performed .
-7 -

# Applicatio no f Simplifie dRefueling

Control s t oaFordTauru s Vehicl e Apri l 198 9
U.S . EPA Offic e of Mobil e Source s Emissio nContro l Technology

Divisio n P.8 7P.8 8 

# Introduction EP A ha s previousl y

applie dsimplifie drefuelingcontrol s t ofue l systems (Figur e 1 ) G M Cutlas s Ciera , Spring198 8 For dTaurus , Fal l 198 8 Bot hsystems performe da s desire d Me t propose demissio nstandard Eliminate dspitbac k Excellen t fil l qualit y

wit hfuel s meetingRVP and dispensingrat e limit s o f EP A

proposa l Simplificationo f curren t design s Commenter s hav e faulte dEPA

work , forno t beingonacar G M andFor dclaime dsystem

didn' t wor kwhe npu t ona car Simila rdesign s onAP I car s ha dsevera l problem s Commenter s pointe dt olac ko f purg e developmen t for EP A syste m I nresponse , EPA

se t ou t t odevelo paca rbase dsystem

### Figur e 1 

# Onboar d Plu s Euaporatiu e Syste m Hs Applie d t o G M an d For d Fue l Tanks

PRESSUR E /

URCUU M RELIE F CR P N O

EHTERNR L DEN TLIN E SHORTE R URPORLIN E 

# §= v \ MODIFIE D FLORT/ ROLLOUE R URLU E 

# V RNT I - SPITBAC K URLU E 

## PURG E URLU E



# ¥/=

TO PURG E INDUCTIO N POIN T

FUE L TANK ENLRRGE D CRRBO N CANISTE RP.9 0 

# Vehicl e Selectio n EPA no t abl e t osignificantl y

alte rpurg e system Therefore , necessary

t ofindavehicl e whic hcoul dhandl e onboardpurg e i nstoc kconfiguratio n Basedupo nrunninglos s testing , aFor dan daG M vehicl e wer e identifie d Low runninglosse s suggeste dgoo dpurg e Testingisolate dth e FordTauru s a s havin gbes t purg eP.9 1 

# System Definitio n Curren t in-us e condition s excee dpropose dfutur e standard s Highdispensin grate s Highfue l volatilit y Enhancement s wer e develope dt ohandl e thes e condition s Woul dno t b e neede dforfutur e vehicle s However , EPA desire dvehicl e t operform

adequatel y unde rcurren t condition s Key area s o f improvemen t Reduce dflo w resistanc e forliqui dsea l Enlarge danti-spitbac kvalv e Enlarge drollover/ven t valv eP.9 2 i



# Component s o f Vehicl e System Liqui dsea l by

overflow tub e (Figur e 2 ) Les s resistanc e at highdispensingrate s Liqui dsea l dow

nt o3 gallon/minut e Enlarge danti-spitbac kvalv e (Figur e 3 ) Locate dinfille rpip e t oallow

us e o f overflow

tub e Productiondesignwoul dplac e a t fue l tankinle t Enlarge drollover/ven t valve (Figur e 4 ) 0.4 " orific e Secondary orific e eliminate dinfavoro f retaining existingtankven t Existingtankven t upgrade dwit hproductio n"blue " valve havinglarge rven t orific e 5/8 " I.D . vapo rven t line 3.5 Lcaniste rirmediatel y

adjacen t t ofue l tank System layou t sho w i nFigur e 5

## FIGUR E 2 : OVERFLO WTUB E

C OP.9 4

1 1 1

1 % 

# 3 1 1 1

1 I 

# D

FIGUR E 3 : SPITBAC KVALV EP.9 5



### \ 

## 0.4 0 I.D . ORIFIC E

FIGUR E 4 : VAPO R VEN TVALV EP.9 6

4 l>

-

FOR D FILLE R PIP E 5/ 8 " I.D . HOS E
VAPO R VEN TVALV E

SPITBAC K VALV E

FOR D FUE L TAN K



### FIGUR E 5 : ONBOAR D REFUELIN G SYSTE M

A S ON TH E FOR D VEHICL EP.9 7 

# Tes t Result s Rollove rtest s o f ven t valv e onfue l tank Zer oleakag e forlef t orrigh t rollove r Refuelingemission s usingful l propose dtes t procedur e wel l below propose dEPA standar d(Tabl e 1 ) 0,0 7 a t 4 gallon s pe rminut e

- ,0 2 at 1 0 gallon s pe rminut e Noeffect s onexhaus t emission s ordriveabilit y Sever e fue l tankslosh/carryove revaluatio n Noliqui dcarryove rt ocaniste r Laboratory fill-ability comparison s (Tabl e 2 ) 14-1 5 RVP fuel , 1 5 gallo npe rminut e dispensin grat e * Nospitbac kononboar dcar * % Drople t spray

an dsome spitbac ko nstoc kTauru s * Othe rlat e mode l car s unabl e t ofil l at thes e condition sI P.9 8

t . 

### V


# Tes t Result s (Con't )

Servic e stationfillabilit y

comparison s (Tabl e 3 ) 14-1 5 RVP winte rfuel s Warm springtime temperature s Dispensingrate s ove r1 2 gallon s pe rminut e Onboar dcarcomparabl e t ostoc kTauru s Onboar dcarsubstantiall y

superio rt oGM

and Chrysle rproduct s

V