alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered December 6, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00970-CV

IN RE SUSAN HARRIMAN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-11994

ORDER

Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s “Motion to Vacate Trial 

Court Orders, Implement Settlement Agreement and Dismiss,” DISMISS this original 

proceeding as moot, and ORDER that the Court’s November 5, 2018 sealing order remain in 

effect following dismissal of this proceeding. We LIFT the Court’s November 2, 2018 stay of 

all trial court proceedings relating to the Attorney Theos Email. We ORDER the parties to each 

bear their own costs, if any, of this original proceeding.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
# Official Journal C 279/11 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 279 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4811 November 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 279

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4811 November 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2005/C 279/1 | Special report No 3/2005 concerning rural development: the verification of agri-environment expenditure, together with the Commission's replies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Court of Auditors

2005/C 279/1

Special report No 3/2005 concerning rural development: the verification of agri-environment expenditure, together with the Commission's replies

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### ISAAC P. JEFFERSON *vs.*ISAAC CONOWAY.

A demand *in writing*for the delivery of an article purchased, cannot be proved *by copy,*without notice to produce the original, or proof of actual comparison.

But such demand need not be in writing, unless the terms of the contract so requir e it.

Sussex,

Spring term, 1848.

This was an action on the case for *17breach of a paroi contract, for the sale of one thousand bushels of corn, at forty-two and a half cents per bushel.

The plaintiff proved a sale of the corn in October, 1835, at this price, the corn to be delivered at any time before March, on two weeks’ notice.

Samuel Jefferson made a demand in writing for the corn; produced the copy of a letter addressed by plaintiff to defendant, and delivered to defendant by witness. This copy was offered in evidence, and objected to, as no notice had been given to the defendant to produce the original.

The plaintiff’s counsel likened it to notices to quit, &c., which are proved without notice to produce the original.

*Bayard*

said, this was not proof of notice. That was always by duplicate; this was evidence of a demand in writing, and the object was to get in the contents of a letter which cannot be proved by copy without production of the original, or notice to produce it.

*The Court*

said, if this was a duplicate original it might be proved; if a mere copy taken by the witness to prove the contents of one delivered to defendant, he ought to have had notice to produce, the original, to compare the copy with it and prevent mistakes or surprise. But whether this is admitted or not, the defendant may prove the demand, which was not required to be in writing.

The witness could not prove either that the paper was a duplicate original, or that it was an exact copy, though he said they were substantially the same.

The court, on this account, ruled the paper out, and the plaintiff was nonsuited.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22785-22786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9233]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9660-6]

Proposed CERCLA Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement; Estate 
of Benjamin C. Schilberg, Cadlerock Properties Site, Ashford and 
Willington, CT

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
administrative settlement for recovery of past costs concerning the 
Cadlerock Properties Superfund Site in Ashford and Willington, 
Connecticut with the following settling party: Estate of Benjamin C. 
Schilberg. The settlement requires the settling party to pay $170,000 
to the Hazardous Substance Superfund. The settlement includes a 
covenant not to sue the settling party pursuant to Section 107(a) of 
CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a). For thirty (30) days following the date of 
publication of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments 
relating to the settlement. The Agency will consider all comments 
received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if 
comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that 
the settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.
    The Agency's response to any comments received will be available 
for public inspection at 5 Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02109-3912.

DATES: Comments must be submitted by May 17, 2012 of this notice.

[[Page 22786]]

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Barbara Gutierrez, Attorney-
Advisor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue 
NW. (2272A), Washington, DC 20460 (Telephone No. 202-562-4292) and 
should refer to: In re: Cadlerock Properties Superfund Site, U.S. EPA 
Docket No. 01-2012-0017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of the proposed settlement may 
be obtained from Barbara Gutierrez, Attorney-Advisor, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW. (2272A), 
Washington, DC 20460 (Telephone No. 202-562-4292; Email 
Gutierrez.barbara@epa.gov).

    Dated: April 10, 2012.
James T. Owens, III,
 Director, Office of Site Remediation and Restoration.
[FR Doc. 2012-9233 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<CIK> 0000053456
<NAME> JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,654,803
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    557,752
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         380,040
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       852,369
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,444,964
<COMMON>                                       153,713
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      510,769
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            913,856    <F1>
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,578,338
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          211,500    <F2>
<PREFERRED>                                     37,741
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,133,593
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              28,900
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   40,012
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        2,500
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                77,874
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,334,506
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                4,444,964
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      516,889
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            35,256
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     403,762
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     439,018
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         77,871
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,654
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  79,525
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        25,828    <F3>
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,697
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,432
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   51,265
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        30,000    <F4>
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       87,275
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         171,793
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0






<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS OF $425.
<F2> INCLUDES AMOUNT FOR COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
<F2> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $125,000.
<F3> INCLUDES AMOUNT FOR COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
<F3> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $2,675.
<F4> REPRESENTS COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS PAID TO PARENT CORPORATION.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 156

Repealing rule XLIX of the Rules of the House of Representatives relating

to the statutory limit on the public debt.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 21, 1993

Mr. STEARNS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Repealing rule XLIX of the Rules of the House of Representatives relating to the statutory limit on the public debt.

1 Resolved, That rule XLIX of the Rules of the House

2 of Representatives is repealed.

Æ
#### DEAN, Lessee of ELISHA E. & I. J. HUDSON *vs.*THOMAS DAZEY, tenant.

•On the trial of a second ejectment between the same real parties, the record of the former action is admissible in evidence, though the fictitious parties he different, and also the term laid.

Writ of Error to- the Superior Court for Sussex county, in an *441action of ejectment. Heard at the June term, 1845, before the Chancellor and Judges Milligan and Wootten.

A previous action of ejectment had been tried and verdict rendered as between the real, but not the nominal, parties to this action. On the trial of the second ejectment, the record of the former action was admitted in evidence. This was the principal error relied on; and it was argued—1. That the record was not evidence, because it was not between the former parties. 2. Because the term sued for as laid in the several demises, was not the same. (1 *Greenl. Evid.,*590, § 522, 520; *Adams on Eject.,*192, 294, 312 ; 1 *Mod. Rep.,*10 ; 2 *Harr. Rep.,*30 ; 3 *Ib.,*489 ; 4 *Ib.,*100.)

*Layton,*for plaintiff in error.

*Cullen,*for defendant in error.

*Mr. Cullen,*contra.

The record of the former trial was properly admitted in evidence. It is between the same real parties, and for the same subject matter. The fictitious parties will be noticed only for form sake. The court overlook them on a question depending on the rights of the real parties. The term laid in the demise is of no consequence on this question. (1 *Saund. Pl. & Ev.,*1064; *Bull. N. P.,*87, 232; 2 *Phill. Ev.,*8 ; 28 *Com. Law. Rep.,*19, 11; 1, 2 *Barn. & Adolp.,*690, *Root vs. Winch; Excheq. Rep.,*728; 2 *Cromp. Mees. & Rosc.,*728 ; 4 *Bac. Ab.*Ev.; 7 *Watts Rep.,*20, 26.)

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CIK> 0000037637
<NAME> FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        3,581
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        395
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             597
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           368
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      56
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,997
<COMMON>                                         1,004
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                921
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         34
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             1,478
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     100
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       77
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   1,383
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    4,997
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        1,323
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                83
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,034
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,117
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            206
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   2
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     208
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            64
<NET-INCOME>                                       144
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          1
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      143
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           103
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             280
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 3.3
 
 The first State
 I, HARRIET SMITH WINDSOR, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE
ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF TECHNOLOGY VISIONS GROUP,
INC. , FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST, A-D. 2005, AT 5 OCLOCK P.M.
 A FILED COPY OF THIS CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO THE NEW CASTLE COUNTY RECORDER OF
DEEDS.
 AND I DO HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AFORESAID CERTIFICATE OF
AMENDMENT IS THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST, A.D. 2005, AT 5 OCLOCK P.M .
 (IMAGE)
    
    Harriet
Smith WindsorHarriet Smith Windsor, Secretary of  State AUTHENTICATION: 4103127DATE: 08-19-05




---



##### 



State of DelawareSecretary of StateDivision of CorporationsDelivered 08:59 AM 08/19/2005FILED 05:00 PM 08/19/2005SRV 050685512  2060538 FILE
 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
 TO
 CERTIFICATE INCORPORATION
 OF
 TECHNOLOGY VISIONS GROUP, INC.
         [ILLEGIBLE]




---



##### 



th
 By:
    
    /s/ James B. LaheyJames B. LaheyPresident and Chief Executive Officers
 -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE> 5
  <MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
         
  <S>                            <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1995
  <PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1996
  <CASH>                                              652
  <SECURITIES>                                          0
  <RECEIVABLES>                                     4,189
  <ALLOWANCES>                                          0
  <INVENTORY>                                         818
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6,155
  <PP&E>                                           52,584
  <DEPRECIATION>                                   30,177
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   37,552
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7,462
  <BONDS>                                          13,578
  <COMMON>                                             49
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
  <PREFERRED>                                           0
  <OTHER-SE>                                        6,909
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     37,552
  <SALES>                                          15,588
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 15,588
  <CGS>                                            11,554
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                    11,554
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      6
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  857
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3,241
  <INCOME-TAX>                                      1,227
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1,258
  <DISCONTINUED>                                        0
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
  <CHANGES>                                             0
  <NET-INCOME>                                      2,014
  <EPS-PRIMARY>                                      2.07
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                      2.07
          
  
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 12

GTE California Incorporated and Subsidiary

STATEMENT OF THE CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Three
                                                            Months Ended
                                                           March 31, 1998
                                                           --------------
<S>                                                         <C>         
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income continuing operations                              $    108,096
  Add - Income taxes                                              72,568
      - Fixed charges                                             34,779
                                                            ------------
Adjusted earnings                                           $    215,443
                                                            ============

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                          $     30,741
  Portion of rent expense representing interest                    4,038
                                                            ------------
Adjusted fixed charges                                      $     34,779
                                                            ============
CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                     6.19
                                                            
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Harold F. Pyle, III, certify that:
*1.* I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MetromediaInternational Group, Inc.; *2.* Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; *3.* Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; *4.* The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 *a)* designed such disclosure control and procedures or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedure to be designed under oursupervision to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  *b)* evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport, based on such evaluation; and  *c)* disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the period covered by this quarterly report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
*5.* The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s Boardof Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 *a)* all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  *b)* any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.
Date: December 7, 2004    /s/ HAROLD F. PYLE, III  *Executive Vice President,* *Chief Financial Officer and*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 12

GTE Southwest Incorporated
STATEMENT OF THE RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Six Months Ended
                                                                    June 30, 1998
                                                                  ----------------
<S>                                                                 <C>         
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income before extraordinary charge                                $    122,244
  Add - Income taxes                                                      63,899
      - Fixed charges                                                     40,874
                                                                    ------------

Adjusted earnings                                                   $    227,017
                                                                    ============

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                                  $     36,292
  Portion of rent expense
      representing interest                                                4,582
                                                                    ------------

Adjusted fixed charges                                              $     40,874
                                                                    ============


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                          5.55
</TABLE>