alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Johnny C. SANDERS v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 46722.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 6, 1972.

James O. Ford, Oxford, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Timmie Hancock, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

SMITH, Justice:

Johnny C. Sanders was convicted in the Justice of the Peace Court of the offense of possessing untaxed whiskey and appealed to the Circuit Court of Lee County. When his case was called in that court, with others, on the first day of the May, 1971 term, Sanders was not present; thereupon, his appeal, and the appeals of other appellants who had failed to answer, were dismissed by the circuit court and writs of procedendo were issued. In due course, the May 1971 term was concluded and adjourned. The next regular term of the circuit court convened and was held in August, 1971. It also was concluded and adjourned. Thereafter, on September 27, 1971, an attorney, acting for Sanders, filed in the Lee County Circuit Court an un-sworn motion to reinstate Sanders’ appeal and have the case heard on its merits. The circuit court overruled this motion and it is from that action that Sanders has now appealed here. The State has moved to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The only facts available to us at this time are the recitals of Sanders’ motion to reinstate. This motion recites that Sanders had no attorney at the time of the dismissal of his circuit court appeal, although it is not alleged in the motion that he was without means to employ one. However, the present appeal is in forma pauperis. The motion also fails to state that Sanders has a meritorious defense or that he is not guilty of the offense charged.

The State’s motion to dismiss is based upon McDowell v. State, 251 Miss. 156, 168 So.2d 658 (1964). In *McDowell, supra,*in dismissing an attempted appeal from a circuit court order overruling a motion to reinstate an appeal to that court, the motion having been filed after adjournment of the term, this Court said:

> We are of the opinion that since the motion to reinstate the appeal and the order thereon were both filed after expiration of the term of court, neither the circuit court nor the Supreme Court has jurisdiction. (Id. at 161, 168 So.2d at 660).

The present case is controlled by *McDowell, supra,*and the trial court acted correctly in dismissing the motion for want of jurisdiction. If this is a proper case for relief under the facts and circumstances, Sanders’ remedy is to proceed by petition *118for writ of error coram nobis wherein such facts and circumstances may be established by proof. The motion to dismiss the appeal will be sustained.

Appeal dismissed.

RODGERS, P. J., and PATTERSON, ROBERTSON and SUGG, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION                                            EXHIBIT 12
STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
(Dollars In millions)

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        Twelve Months Ended                 Year Ended
                                           September 30,                    December 31,
                                        2000            1999            1999            1998
                                      --------        --------        --------        --------
<S>                                   <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
NET INCOME                            $  283.0        $  276.7        $  267.0        $  250.1

Add:
    Operating Income Taxes               160.1           152.5           149.1           140.3
    Other Income Taxes                     1.8             4.6             2.2              .7
                                      --------        --------        --------        --------

Income Before Taxes                      444.9           433.8           418.3           391.1

Total Interest Charges                   127.0           125.8           124.0           136.5
                                      --------        --------        --------        --------

Total Earnings (A)                    $  571.9        $  559.6        $  542.3        $  527.6

Fixed Charges (B)                     $  127.0        $  125.8        $  124.0        $  136.5
                                      --------        --------        --------        --------

Ratio of Earnings to
    Fixed Charges (A/B)                   4.50            4.45            4.37            3.87
                                      ========        ========        ========        ========
</TABLE>
H. Res. 302

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

November 10, 1993.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 1025) to provide for a waiting period before

the purchase of a handgun, and for the establishment of a

national instant criminal background check system to be contacted by firearms dealers before the transfer of any firearm.

The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived.

General debate shall be confined to the bill and the amendments made in order by this resolution and shall not exceed

one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary.

After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under

the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a sub-
2

HRES 302 EH

stitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now

printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in

part 1 of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying

this resolution. The committee amendment in the nature of

a substitute, as modified, shall be considered as read. All

points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute, as modified, are waived. No amendment

to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute,

as modified, shall be in order except those printed in part 2

of the report of the Committee on Rules. Each amendment

may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may

be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall

be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment,

and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All

points of order against the amendment numbered 3 in part

2 of the report are waived. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of

a substitute made in order as original text. The previous
3

HRES 302 EH

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening

motion except one motion to recommit with or without

instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 110 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 110

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         March 3, 1993.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, elected 
to the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Budget: Glen Browder, Alabama; Lynn C. Woolsey, California.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Kinetics
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Sandy B. Sewitch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Sandy B. Sewitch
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Sandy B. Sewitch
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   October 15, 2002





KL2:2180129.1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<CIK> 0000065350
<NAME> METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,327,981
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    204,122
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         184,024
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,923,464
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,639,591
<COMMON>                                        66,273
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      370,200
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             98,706    <F1>
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 535,179
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          100,000    <F2>
<PREFERRED>                                     12,056
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           576,926
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              31,100
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  45,726
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       22
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         30
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                30,731
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,307,821
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                3,639,591
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      460,778
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            32,906
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     349,200
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     382,106
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         78,672
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              (5,534)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  73,138
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        29,860    <F3>
<NET-INCOME>                                  (144,002)   <F4>
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        242
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                 (144,244)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        40,000    <F5>
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       42,838
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          70,971
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME OF $14,316.
<F2> REPRESENTS COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE PREFERRED
<F2> SECURITIES.
<F3> INCLUDES DIVIDENDS ON COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE
<F3> PREFERRED SECURITIES OF $4,500.
<F4> INCLUDES AN AFTER-TAX CHARGE FOR AN EXTRAORDINARY ITEM OF $187,280.
<F5> REPRESENTS COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS PAID TO PARENT CORPORATION.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Order entered October 1 2 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fi fth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 22 - 01010 - CV No. 05 - 22 - 01011 - CV No. 05 - 22 - 01012 - CV No. 05 - 22 - 01013 - CV No. 05 - 22 - 01014 - CV No. 05 - 22 - 01015 - CV No. 05 - 22 - 01016 - CV No. 05 - 22 - 01017 - CV IN RE ALEX PERRY NEAL , Relator O riginal Proceedings from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No . 296 - 82970, No. 296 - 82971, No. 296 - 82972, No. 296 - 82973, No. 296 - 82974, No. 296 - 82975, No. 296 - 082976, No. 296 - 82977 ORDER Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DISMISS these proceedings for wan t of jurisdiction

. /s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 990 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 990

  To provide that the Secretary of Commerce shall not set minimum or 
 maximum amounts on grants made for the purpose of providing financial 
 assistance to States whose tourism promotion needs have increased due 
       to Hurricane Andrew, Hurricane Iniki, or other disasters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 1993

  Mrs. Mink introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that the Secretary of Commerce shall not set minimum or 
 maximum amounts on grants made for the purpose of providing financial 
 assistance to States whose tourism promotion needs have increased due 
       to Hurricane Andrew, Hurricane Iniki, or other disasters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, Notwithstanding any 
other provision of law, the Secretary of Commerce, acting pursuant to 
Public Law 102-368 to provide grants to cover the costs of tourism 
promotion needs arising from Hurricane Andrew, Hurricane Iniki, or 
other disasters, shall not establish or enforce a maximum or a minimum 
dollar amount of assistance to be made available to an individual or to 
a State.

                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Boy Elijah O’STEEN, Appellee.

No. M-95.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 13, 1970.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and J. Christian Meffert, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

A. C. Soud, Jr., Jacksonville, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

This court having consolidated for appeal this case and 14 others wherein the same defendant was charged with 15 separate offenses arising out of one search and seizure and one arrest, and the same principles of law being applicable, the order *440appealed from in this case is reversed pursuant to our decision in State of Florida v. O’Steen, 238 So.2d 434, opinion filed this date.

Reversed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,744,745
<SECURITIES>                                     1,747,445
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,566,860
<PP&E>                                           1,373,571
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,800,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,491,110
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            82,190
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,401,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,800,263
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,902,806
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,459,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 195,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,247,982
<INCOME-TAX>                                       165,382
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,082,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .04
                                               


</TABLE>
#### ELISHA D. CULLEN *vs.*ELIZA GREEN.

To support a plea of *tender,*the money must be paid into court.

Money may, at any time, be paid into court, to save costs subsequently accruing.

This was an action of assumpsit, for compensation to an attorney, in certain suits and causes conducted by him for the defendant.

*18
      *Bayard,*for plaintiff.

*Layton,*for defendant.

The defendant pleaded a tender, and *'Mr. Bayard*now moved to strike out the plea, because the money was not deposited; which the court ordered. But they said the defendant might deposit the money under Art. 6, Sec. 17, of the Oonstitution, though it would not avail under a plea of tender, which must aver that the defendant is and has always been ready, &c.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Leonard JOHNSON v. C. Paul PHELPS, Secretary, Department of Corrections.

No. 62643.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Leonard Johnson, applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 2, 2017

NO. 03-17-00085-CV

Dennis Sanders, Appellant

v.

Krista Marie Merritt, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on November 2, 2016. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THE QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                     122,600
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               42,822
<ALLOWANCES>                               (13,639)
<INVENTORY>                                 66,091
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           225,153
<PP&E>                                      45,909
<DEPRECIATION>                              (4,731)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             921,573
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      223,241
<BONDS>                                    348,140
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    66,127
<OTHER-SE>                                 188,601
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               254,728
<SALES>                                    113,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           113,175
<CGS>                                       87,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              146,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          20,416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (59,318)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   723
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (60,041)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (16,305)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (4,505)
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (80,851)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (1.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (1.60)
        


</TABLE>