alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 204/26 J

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 204 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4926 July 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 204

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4926 July 2006

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 1107/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 concerning the rights of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility when travelling by air
   (1) | 1 |
| | * | Directive 2006/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 amending Directive 95/2/EC on food additives other than colours and sweeteners and Directive 94/35/EC on sweeteners for use in foodstuffs | 10 |
| | * | Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast) | 23 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Regulation (EC) No 1107/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 concerning the rights of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility when travelling by air
   (1)

1

*

Directive 2006/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 amending Directive 95/2/EC on food additives other than colours and sweeteners and Directive 94/35/EC on sweeteners for use in foodstuffs

10

*

Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast)

23

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kerry Andras LABAUVE.

No. 62111.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 2, 1978.

In re: Kerry Andras Labauve applying for remedial writs. Parish of Terrebonne.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Ashby W. Pettigrew, Jr., Judge of the Thirty-Second (32nd) Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Terrebonne, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 16th day of May, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 241 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 241

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        August 6, 1993.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2010) to amend the 
National and Community Service Act of 1990 to establish a Corporation for 
National Service, enhance opportunities for national service, and provide 
national service educational awards to persons participating in such service, 
and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered 
as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### JEFFERSON NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI BEACH, as Executor of the Estate of Lillian Rubin Newman, Deceased, Petitioner, v. Leonard FELDMAN, as successor executor of the Estate of Samuel S. Newman, Deceased, Respondent.

No. 74-197.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 14, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30753-30754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14050]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-0793]


Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., and Sun Pharma Global FZE; 
Withdrawal of Approval of Four Abbreviated New Drug Applications; 
Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice 
that appeared in the Federal Register on March 14, 2018. The notice 
announced the voluntary withdrawal of approval of four abbreviated new 
drug applications (ANDAs) from two applicants, effective April 13, 
2018. In particular, the notice indicated that FDA was withdrawing 
approval of the following ANDA after receiving a withdrawal request 
from Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., c/o Sun Pharmaceutical 
Industries, Inc. (Sun Pharmaceutical), 2 Independence Way, Princeton, 
NJ 08540: ANDA 076045, Lorazepam Tablets USP, 0.5 milligram (mg), 1 mg, 
and 2 mg. Before withdrawal of this ANDA became effective, however, Sun 
Pharmaceutical informed FDA that it did not want approval of the ANDA 
withdrawn. Because Sun Pharmaceutical timely requested that approval of 
this ANDA not be withdrawn, the approval of ANDA 076045 is still in 
effect.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trang Tran, Center for Drug Evaluation 
and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire

[[Page 30754]]

Ave., Bldg. 75, Rm. 1671, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-402-7945.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of Wednesday, March 
14, 2018 (83 FR 11208), appearing on page 11208 in FR Doc. 2018-05120, 
the following correction is made:
    1. On page 11208, the entry for ANDA 076045 in the table is 
removed.

    Dated: June 26, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-14050 Filed 6-28-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
#### James RUTLEDGE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43675.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 6, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 275 So.2d 627.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN and BOYD, JJ., dissent.
FILED

November 6, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AT JACKSON

JULY 1998 SESSION

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

) C.C.A. No. 02C01-9707-CC-00277

Appellee, )

) MADISON COUNTY

VS. )

) HON. WHIT LAFON,

JOHN EDWARD CLARK, ) JUDGE

)

Appellant. ) (Attempted Aggravated Robbery,

) Vandalism)

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur in the excellent opinion by Judge Witt. Although this reversal is not

based upon an issue presented for our review, this Court has an affirmative obligation

in all cases to “consider whether the trial and appellate court have jurisdiction over the

subject matter, whether or nor presented for review.” Tenn. R. App. P. 13(b). 

Nevertheless, it is regrettable that this Court must at this juncture in the criminal

proceedings declare the indictment void. Obviously, the indictment was seriously

flawed; however, there was no pretrial motion alleging a defect in the indictment. The

sufficiency of the indictment was first raised during trial when defense counsel advised

the court that he did not have a copy of the indictment until the lunch hour. Defense

counsel then orally moved to dismiss the indictment since it did not name a victim and

merely stated the legal conclusion that an attempted aggravated robbery had been

committed. The trial court overruled the motion noting its frustration that defense

counsel had not read the indictment prior to trial. 

Had this issue been properly considered before trial, the time and expense of

a trial and this appellate proceeding may well have been avoided. Nevertheless, it

becomes our responsibility in light of Hill and Ruff to declare the indictment void. 
2

In light of the Tennessee Supreme Court’s pronouncements in Hill and Ruff,

trial courts, prosecutors and defense counsel should be more aware of the importance

of properly drafted indictments. 

______________________________

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE
#### Willie REATH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-973.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 21, 1972.

Pollack, Yocom & Fath, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Barry Scott Richard, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: § 790.01(2), Fla.Stat. 1969, F.S.A.; Lawson v. State, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 683.
Robert H. Baldwin
   President                B E L L A G I O

June 16, 1999


Mr. Stephen A. Wynn
Chairman of the Board and
 Chief Executive Officer
Mirage Resorts, Incorporated
3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South
Las Vegas, Nevada  89109

  Re:  Amendment No. 2 to Fine Art Rental Agreement

Dear Steve:

Pursuant  to Paragraph 3 of the letter agreement dated December 31, 1998
between  Bellagio and you (the "Rental Agreement"), this letter confirms
our agreement that, effective this date, the following  work of fine art
shall be added to Exhibit A to the Rental  Agreement  for  the following
monthly rent:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                  Work                                      Monthly Rent
     ----------------------------------                     ------------
     <S>                                                      <C>
     "Composition with Head"  by                              $8,587
     Arshile Gorky (1936-1937, oil
     on canvas, 76-1/2 x 60-1/2 inches)
</TABLE>

Please  sign  below  to  confirm  your  agreement to the foregoing.   My
signature below confirms Bellagio's agreement thereto.

Very truly yours,

BELLAGIO


By:  ROBERT H. BALDWIN
     -------------------------------------
     ROBERT H. BALDWIN
     President and Chief Executive Officer

I hereby agree to the foregoing.

     STEPHEN A. WYNN
     -------------------------------------
     STEPHEN A. WYNN

cc:  Bruce A. Levin
     Peter C. Walsh
     James E. Pettis
     George J. Panek

                P.O. BOX 7700, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89177-7700

                            EXHIBIT 10.3
263 La. 91

#### Louis E. MOOSSY v. HUCKABAY HOSPITAL INC.

No. 52868.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 17, 1972.

In re: Louis E. Moossy applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Red River, 266 So.2d 235.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
### AIR CENTURY. B.A.
·. Su lfnea aereaprivada
...

Santo Domingo,. Dominican Republic October 09, 2012

Mr. U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-240 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE. Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr.: . . ·. . . . 

## ,.,r·pA'

# RTME' 'To'F'
.. !j[i d I 1\J. ·.· . 

### !**~~:ANSPORTATION** ' ,- r..

## --!/r'T 

## "P'RATir.r.l('· ; . );,;1'\t U [ ,**Ul'~·)** 

## ZOIZDCT l l P 3: 2 8

As per your letter**~ated** Sept 20, ?012, we confirm reception to the new address to file our petition for rulemaking or exception of CFR 129.20, regarding our two us registration aircraft ·included in our Oper/Specifications (N434SB and N20WN), that both still operating contrary to the regulations in not compliance with FOR's, aftet considering all the aspect is mandatory for us to file and request an exception to the rule, reason why we kindly are requesting a period of**~4** months to be able to comply such installations with a heavy financial investment for our small 135 company, due to the**hig~** cost of units and ground installations of equipment w/out flying at all. Your sincerely

Aeropuerto lnternacional Dr. Joaquin Balaguer, Santo Domingo, Rep. Dom Oficina: 809-826-4222 • Fax: 809-826-4118 http://www.aircentury.com • E-mail: reservaciones@aircentury.com RNC: 1-01585341
H. Res. 164

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

May 5, 1993.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the State of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 820) to amend the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 to enhance manufacturing

technology development and transfer, to authorize appropriations for the Technology Administration of the Department

of Commerce, including the National Institute of Standards

and Technology, and for other purposes. The first reading of

the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against

consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause

2(l)(6) of rule XI are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. After

general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment

under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as
2

HRES 164 EH

an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the fiveminute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology now printed in the bill, modified by the amendment

printed in section 2 of this resolution. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute, as modified, shall be considered by title rather than by section. Each title shall be

considered as read. Points of order against the committee

amendment in the nature of a substitute, as modified, for

failure to comply with clause 5(a) of rule XXI are waived. At

the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment, the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute, as modified. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on

the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

SEC. 2. The amendment in the nature of a substitute

recommended by the Committee on Science, Space, and Tech-
3

HRES 164 EH

nology now printed in the bill is modified by striking section

506.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                                     487,562
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               35,197
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           585,191
<PP&E>                                                     290,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                              91,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             891,653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      141,226
<BONDS>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                    11,080
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 739,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               891,653
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             3,171
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           985,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           3,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (986,487)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (986,487)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (986,487)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.11)





</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1
  SUBSIDIARY
    
    STATE OF INCORPORATIONBorders, Inc.
    

    ColoradoBorders Direct, LLC
    

    VirginiaBorders Fulfillment, Inc.
    

    DelawareBorders Online, LLC
    

    DelawareBorders Online, Inc.
    

    ColoradoBorders Properties, Inc.
    

    DelawareBorders/JGE Joint Venture LLC
    

    MichiganWalden Book Company, Inc.
    

    ColoradoWalden Online, Inc.
    

    ColoradoBGI (UK) Limited
    

    U.K.BGP (UK) Limited
    

    U.K.Evermatch Limited
    

    U.K.Meridian Books Limited
    

    U.K.Charing Cross Properties Limited
    

    U.K.Borders Bookstore (M) SDN.BHD
    

    MalaysiaBorders International Services, Inc.
    

    MichiganPaperchase Products Limited
    

    U.K.Paperchase Limited UK
    

    U.K.Paperchase Designs Limited
    

    U.K.Paperchase Designs Ireland Limited
    

    Ireland
May 22 , 2015 The Hon. John Kerry Secretary U.S

. Department of State 2201 C Street, NW Washington , DC 20520 The Hon. Anthony Foxx Secretary L 

## PHILIPPINE AMER ICAN (

**II**

**~** ti H '' ( ): ( ' t)'' -1'11 l ' t I S ('f\ in!!

**Southl';l**

**er n**  \ ir!!i nia

U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue , SE Washington , DC 20590 T he Hon

. Penny S. Pritzker Secretary U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue , NW Washington , DC 20230 Re : Dockets No. DOS-2015-0016 , DOT-OST-2015-0082, and DOC-2015-0001 Dear Secreta ries Kerry, Foxx, and Pritzker: As President of the Philippine American Chamber of Commerce of Southeastern Virginia (PACC
- SEVA) , I am compelled to voice our strong concerns regarding any proposal to reopen the United States' Ope n Skies ag reements with the major airl ines of the Gulf States. Our members represent Virg in ia 's considerable Filipino business community and rely upon the competitive international air travel marketplace to survive and thrive. In many cases , the future of our commun ity's success in Virginia depends on affordable , reliable access to reasonable international air travel. Limiting our access to these growing Gulf State airlines would be devastating to our membership.In today's global economy, whether you're in Norfolk, Virginia or Manila, Philippines- accessible travel options are essential to small business growth. Without affordable and convenient access to and from Southeast Asia specifically , our community will be severely limited in our ability to grow, and that ultimately hurts Virginia 's economy, too. The Gulf State airlines, almost without exception , better serve our international travel needs with respect to affordability , comfort and reliability than their American competitors. But , that's not a reason to grant anticompetitive protections to the American carriers. Truly, we would all be better served by forcing U

.S

. carriers to compete in a free market rather than simply locking out the competition. As an organization of business leaders, each one of our members must compete to survive every day. The global air travel industry should be no diffe rent. We urge you to protect and preserve the Open Skies agreements with the Gulf States. To do otherwise would be irresponsible , anticompetitive and bad for business

. Sincerely,

Naomi V. Estaris President Philippine American Chamber of Commerce of Southeastern Virgini a

5347 Lila Lane Suite 101 Virginia Bea ch Virginia 23464 PH: 757 424 3311
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

          - 29 CFR Part 1614

### CFR Correction

In Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 900 to 1899, revised as of July 1, 2017, on page 302, in § 1614.304, paragraph (b)(4) is reinstated to read as follows:

§ 1614.304

* * * * *

(b) * * *

(4) A copy of the decision issued by the MSPB; and

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2018-13907 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 1301-00-D