alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                FIRST ALLMERICA FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                       ENHANCED DEATH BENEFIT "EDB" RIDER

OVERVIEW:

The EDB Rider ("Rider") is an optional rider the Owner has selected. It provides
an enhanced Death Benefit, which provides a ratchet.

APPLICABILITY:

The Rider is made a part of the certificate to which it is attached and is
effective on the issue date.

BENEFIT:

The "Death Benefit" provision of the certificate is replaced by the following:

If an Owner, or an Annuitant if the Owner is a non-natural person, dies before
the Annuity Date, the Death Benefit will be the greatest of:

    (a)  the Accumulated Value on the Effective Valuation Date;

    (b)  gross Payments made until the date of death, proportionately reduced
         for subsequent withdrawals and

    (c)  the highest Accumulated Value on any certificate anniversary prior to
         the date of death, as determined after being increased for subsequent
         Payments and proportionately reduced for subsequent withdrawals.

PROPORTIONATE REDUCTION:

Sections (b) and (c) refer to a proportionate reduction. This proportionate
reduction is calculated by multiplying the (b) or (c) value, whichever is
applicable, determined immediately prior to the withdrawal by the following:

                            Amount of the withdrawal
                            ------------------------
        Accumulated Value determined immediately prior to the withdrawal.

CHARGE FOR BENEFIT:

While this Rider is in effect, the Company will assess the EDB Charge (see
Specifications page).

Form 3292.NY-01GRC                                                       nyacs7

<Page>

TERMINATION:

This Rider will terminate on the earliest of the following:

    (a)  the Annuity Date;

    (b)  when a Death Benefit is payable and the certificate is not continued
         under a spousal takeover; or

    (c)  surrender of the certificate.



                       Signed for the Company at Worcester, MA







           President                                        Secretary

Form 3292.NY-01GRC                                                       nyacs7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BOISE
CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS CORPORATION'S BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND
FROM ITS STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          31,838
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  403,552
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,539
<INVENTORY>                                    226,955
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               698,673
<PP&E>                                         386,375
<DEPRECIATION>                               (149,071)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,461,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          468,657
<BONDS>                                        354,224
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           658
<OTHER-SE>                                     562,256
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,461,745
<SALES>                                      3,067,327
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,067,327
<CGS>                                        2,278,845
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,278,845
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               667,988
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,914
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 95,911
<INCOME-TAX>                                    42,844
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             53,067
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,067
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81
        

</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                Exhibit 10.37(e)

                                 David E. Berges
                             c/o Hexcel Corporation
                               Two Stamford Plaza
                                281 Tresser Blvd.


                                                August 1, 2001


Hexcel Corporation
Two Stamford Plaza
281 Tresser Blvd.
Attn: Board of Directors

Gentlemen:

                  Reference is made to the Employment Agreement entered into as
of July 30, 2001, between Hexcel Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "COM
PANY"), and me (the "Employment Agreement"), the Restricted Stock Agreement
entered into as of July 30, 2001 by and between the Company and me (the "Re
stricted Stock Agreement") and the Employee Option Agreements, dated as of July
30, 2001, by and between me and the Company (the "Option Agreements"). We hereby
agree as follows (notwithstanding anything in the Employment Agreement, the
Restricted Stock Agreement or the Option Agreements to the contrary):

                  1. The Company shall issue the Restricted Shares (as defined
in the Restricted Stock Agreement) to me as soon as practicable following the
filing by the Company of a Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to such issuance, which filing the Company shall make as soon as
practicable after the date hereof.

                  2. Unless otherwise legally required, certificates for
unrestricted shares issuable under the Restricted Stock Agreement and for shares
issuable pursuant to the Option Agreements shall not bear any restrictive
legend. In the event a restrictive legend is legally required, upon written
request, the Company will cause any such legend on such certificates to be
removed as promptly as practicable after it becomes legally appropriate for the
Company to do so.


<Page>


                  Please acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by
signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to me.

                                            Sincerely,

                                            /s/ DAVID E. BERGES
                                            ---------------------
                                            David E. Berges


Agreed to and Accepted:

HEXCEL CORPORATION

By:  /s/ IRA J. KRAKOWER
    --------------------
Name:  Ira J. Krakower
Title: Senior Vice President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6177

PAMELA J. ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PATRICIA HUFFMAN; KIM WARE; TRACY MEYERHOFFER; LARRY HUFFMAN; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES; JOHN BARNETT, MD; RUTH NESBITT; ARLENE JOHNSON; LERLA JOSEPH, MD; PRISON HEALTH SERVICES; E. LOONEY; FRED SCHILLING, MD; T. HICKS, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-602-7) Submitted: March 20, 2002 Decided: April 8, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pamela J. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Pamela J. Anderson, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Anderson v. Huffman , No. CA-01-602-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
H. Res. 163

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

May 5, 1993.

Resolved, That during consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2) to establish national

voter registration procedures for Federal elections, and for

other purposes, points of order against the conference report

for failure to comply with clause 3 of rule XXVIII are

waived.

Attest:

Clerk.
# Official Journal C 247I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 247I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6425 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 247I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6425 June 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2021/C 247 I/01 | Modification of the Annex to the Agreement between the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, regarding the protection of classified information exchanges in the interests of the European Union, signed in Brussels on 25 May 2011 ( OJ C 202, 8.7.2011, p. 13 ) | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2021/C 247 I/01

Modification of the Annex to the Agreement between the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, regarding the protection of classified information exchanges in the interests of the European Union, signed in Brussels on 25 May 2011 ( OJ C 202, 8.7.2011, p. 13 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 301 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 114

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 301

                          [Report No. 103-340]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 3116) making appropriations for the Department of Defense 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 9, 1993

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                                 House Calendar No. 114
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 301

                          [Report No. 103-340]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 3116) making appropriations for the Department of Defense 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 1993

    Mr. Frost, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 3116) making appropriations for the Department of Defense 
 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
3116) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as 
read.
```
# Official Journal C 47/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.047.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 47 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5517 February 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.047.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 47

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5517 February 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2012/C 047/01 | Opinion No 7/2011 (presented pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 287(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund covered by the Common Strategic Framework and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2012/C 047/01

Opinion No 7/2011 (presented pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 287(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund covered by the Common Strategic Framework and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006

(presented pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 287(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
259 La. 741

#### Arlene King BABINEAUX v. PERNIE-BAILEY DRILLING COMPANY, et al.

No. 51569.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 1971.

In re: Arlene King Babineaux applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 250 So.2d 224.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                 Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc.
                   Certification of CFO Pursuant to
             18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
              Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


    I, F. Dixon McElwee, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Frozen Food Express Industries,
Inc. A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. and will
be retained by Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



May 14, 2003                                  /s/ F. Dixon McElwee, Jr.
                                              ------------------------
                                              F. Dixon McElwee, Jr.
                                              Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,251,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,180,673
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,528,658
<PP&E>                                         288,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,845,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,393,067
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,510
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,813,314
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,845,865
<SALES>                                      1,921,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,921,451
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,704,151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             444,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (227,704)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (227,704)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (227,704)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.07)
        

</TABLE>
#### MORRIS WEISLER AND ANOTHER v. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF KNIGHTS AND LADIES OF SECURITY.1

April 28, 1916.

Nos. 19,811—(215).

1

 Reported in 157 N. W. 648.

Per Curiam.

The facts in. this case are essentially the same as those in Kanevsky v. National Council of Knights and Ladies of Security, supra, page 422, 157 N. W. 646 and the decision in that case controls this.

Order reversed.
# C_2011356EN.01001101.xml

| 6.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 356/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 356/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 December 2011

2011/C 356/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3442 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 104,81 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4353 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85925 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0460 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2379 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7260 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,146 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 299,98 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6978 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4687 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3542 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4585 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3072 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3644 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4454 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7191 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7229 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 515,69 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,7501 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5310 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5140 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 142,16 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2080 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,158 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,5400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,401 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3957 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,1214 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,0580 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3442

JPY

Japanese yen

104,81

DKK

Danish krone

7,4353

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85925

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0460

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2379

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7260

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,146

HUF

Hungarian forint

299,98

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6978

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4687

RON

Romanian leu

4,3542

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4585

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3072

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3644

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4454

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7191

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7229

KRW

South Korean won

1 515,69

ZAR

South African rand

10,7501

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5310

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5140

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 142,16

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2080

PHP

Philippine peso

58,158

RUB

Russian rouble

41,5400

THB

Thai baht

41,401

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3957

MXN

Mexican peso

18,1214

INR

Indian rupee

69,0580

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
MEMORANDUM

TO: Jodi Howard, U.S. EPA, Sector Policies and Programs Division/Coatings and 

Chemicals Group

FROM: Eastern Research Group, Inc.

DATE: April 8, 2011

SUBJECT: Potential to Emit Calculations for CertainTeed – Lake Charles, LA

Permitted carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compound (VOC), and vinyl chloride 

emission rates for CertainTeed – Lake Charles1are as follows:

Table 1. Permitted Annual CO, VOC, and Vinyl Chloride Emission Rates for

CertainTeed – Lake Charles

Emission Point

No. Emission Point CO(tons/yr)

VOC

(tons/yr)

Vinyl 

Chloride

(tons/yr)

1-76 Boiler 4.20 0.33 -

5-76 Initial Classification (Unit 1 Poly) - 0.82 0.82

6-76 Crusher Conveyor “B” Product - - -

2-79A Thermal Oxidizer “A” 0.50 0.26 0.22

2-79B Thermal Oxidizer “B” 0.50 0.26 0.22

2-79C Thermal Oxidizer “C” 0.50 0.26 0.22

3-87 Reactor Openings (9 reactors) - 0.04 0.04

4-87 Fugitives - 0.50 0.50

1-97 Initial Classification (Unit 2 Poly) - 0.43 0.43

1-01 Stack (7-76, 8-76, and 9-76) - 1.51 1.51

1-05 Classification Building #2 Bag-house - - -

Totals 5.70 4.41 3.96

Considering only the three thermal oxidizers (Emission Point Nos. 2-79A, 2-79B, and 2-79C), 

the annual controlled emission rate for each thermal oxidizer is 0.22 tons per year (tons/yr) of 

vinyl chloride and the total controlled vinyl chloride emission rate for the three units combined is 

0.67 tons/yr. The reported control efficiency of each unit is greater than 99%. The potential to 

emit (PTE) prior to control for each unit can be calculated by:

 

1

Permit No.: 0520-00025-05, Permit Modification, CertainTeed Corporation, Sulphur, Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana. 

Agency Interest (AI) No. 3063, Activity No. 20050001, September 29, 2005.
where,

PTE = potential to emit prior to control, tons/yr

AER = annual emission rate, tons/yr

CE = control efficiency, %

The calculated potential to emit prior to control for each thermal oxidizer is 22.3 tons/yr of vinyl 

chloride. The total potential to emit prior to control for all three units combined is 66.9 tons/yr 

of vinyl chloride. The calculations and results are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Vinyl Chloride PTE Prior to Thermal Oxidizer Control

Emission Point Emission Point

No.

Control 

Efficiency

Annual Emission 

Rate (tons/yr)

Potential to Emit Prior to 

Control (tons/yr)

Vinyl Chloride Vinyl Chloride

Thermal Oxidizer "A" 2-79A 99% 0.22 22.3

Thermal Oxidizer "B" 2-79B 99% 0.22 22.3

Thermal Oxidizer "C" 2-79C 99% 0.22 22.3

Total 0.67 66.9

Therefore, for the streams that are controlled by the three thermal oxidizers, CertainTeed – Lake 

Charles’ potential to emit vinyl chloride prior to control would place the facility above the Clean 

Air Act (CAA) major source threshold for single HAP emissions greater than 10 tons/yr.