alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50147 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JOSE FRANCISCO HERNANDEZ, also known as Jose Francisco HernandezBuelna Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-2399-ALL
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and DENNIS and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Francisco Hernandez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation and was sentenced to 60 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Hernandez argues that his sentence, which was within the recommended guidelines range, w as substantively unreasonable because his criminal history scorewasoverstated and the instant offensewas hisfirst illegal reentry offense. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 17, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-50147

2 An appellate court’s review of a sentence must start with the issue whether the district court committed any “significant procedural error, such as failing tocalculate (or improperly calculating) theGuidelines range, treating the Guidelines as mandatory, failing to consider the [18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a) factors, selecting a sentence based on clearly erroneous facts, or failing to adequately explain the chosen sentence.” Gall v. United States, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597 (2007). If the sentencing decision is procedurally sound, the appellate court then considers “the substantive reasonableness of the sentence imposed under an abuse-of-discretion standard.” Id. Because Hernandez did not challenge the substantive reasonableness of his sentence in the district court, the issue is reviewed for plain error. See United States v. Peltier, 505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir.2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 2959 (2008). Hernandez has not shown that the district court erred at all, much less plainly erred in imposing the length of sentence it chose. His within-guidelines sentence is entitled to a rebuttable presumption of reasonableness. See United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006);
seealso Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462 (2007). Although Hernandez
c ontends that the district court did not take into account certain mitigating factors, he made these arguments at sentencing, and the district court considered those arguments, as well as the § 3553(a) factors, in sentencing him. AFFIRMED.
#### Elizabeth Jean CREASON, Appellant, v. William H. CREASON, Appellee.

No. 69-540.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 1, 1970.

Rehearing Denied June 17, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
256 La. 839

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. William James HART, Jr. v. CITY OF MONROE et al.

No. 50867.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1970.

PER CURIAM:

Writ denied. No showing is made to warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction. The City Courts are not empowered to issue writs of habeas corpus.

See: Louisiana Constitution Article VII, Sections 2 and 51. See also: Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure, Articles 352 and 353 and the Preliminary Statement to Title IX thereof.
ChiefJustice ^^j^*^^ Clerk JamesT.Worthen ^JsausJ***^ Cathy S.Lusk 

### Twelfth Court ofAppeals Justices ChiefStaffAttorney Sam Griffith Margaret Hussey Diane DeVasto Wednesday, October 12, 2005


### Mr. JeffBarnhill Mr. W. Stephen Shires Zeleskey, Cornelius, Hallmark, Shires & Mettauer Roper & Hicks, LLP 116 Tenaha Street P. O. Drawer 1728 P.O. Box 2016 

### Lufkin, TX 75902-1728 Center, TX 75935 RE: Case Number: 12-04-00302-CV Trial Court Case Number: 03CV-27749 Style: Richard Malatt

v. 

### C & R Refrigeration 

### Enclosed is a copy of the Opinion issued this date in the above styled and numbered cause. Also enclosed is a copy ofthe Court's judgment. Very truly yours, CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK 

# By: KtfjUJIA, Mfl. Katrina McClenny, ChiefDepirft Clerk CC: Hon. Charles R. Mitchell Hon. John Ovard 

### Ms. Marsha Singletary

1517 West Front Street • Suite 354 • Tyler, TX 75702 • Tel: 903-593-8471 • Fax: 903-593-2193 

### ServingAnderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, SanAugustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van Zandt and Wood Counties www. 12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us 

# J
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of G&K Services, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: January 29, 2010By:
    /s/ Jeffrey L. WrightJeffrey L. Wright, Executive Vice
President,
 Chief Financial Officer and Director(Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 839 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 839

  To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow Federal employees to 
  seek election to local office, and otherwise take an active part in 
political management or in political campaigns relating to an election 
                           to such an office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1993

 Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow Federal employees to 
  seek election to local office, and otherwise take an active part in 
political management or in political campaigns relating to an election 
                           to such an office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) paragraph (1) 
of section 7326 of title 5, United States Code, is amended to read as 
follows:
            ``(1) an election and the preceding campaign if--
                    ``(A) none of the candidates is to be nominated or 
                elected at that election as representing a party any of 
                whose candidates for presidential elector received 
                votes in the last preceding election at which 
                presidential electors were selected; or
                    ``(B) it involves an election for a municipal or 
                other local office (as defined under regulations which 
                the Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe); 
                or''.
    (b)(1) The heading for section 7326 of title 5, United States Code, 
is amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 7326. Nonpartisan and certain other political activity 
              permitted''.
    (2) The table of sections for chapter 73 of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 7326 and 
inserting the following:

``7326. Nonpartisan and certain other political activity permitted.''.

                                 <all>
```
**KFS** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 1 8 - 0666 THOMAS KOOP, III ,

Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA ,

Respondent and Appellee.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERE D that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including June 3 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 21 2020

04/21/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0666
Exhibit 23.1
 
 
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-
98470 and File No. 333-11147) of our report dated January 29, 1999, on
our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Diamond Multimedia
Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which reports are included in this
Form 10-K.
 
 
 
 
/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P.
     PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P.
San Jose, California
March 31, 1999
<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 30184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13787]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, HIV Vaccine Research and Design 
(HIVRAD) Program (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: July 16-17, 2018.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jay R. Radke, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, Room 
#3G11B, National Institutes of Health, NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane, 
MSC-9823, Bethesda, MD 20892-9823, (240) 669-5046, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#016b60782f7360656a64416f68692f666e77"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4228233b6c3023262927022c2b2a6c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, AIDSRRC Independent SEP.
    Date: July 17, 2018.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Audrey O. Lau, Ph.D., MPH, Scientific Review 
Officer, AIDS Review Branch SRP, Rm. 3E70, National Institutes of 
Health, NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC 9834, Rockville, MD 20852-
9834, 240-669-2081, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b7a6e7f697e6235777a6e5b757273357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="68091d0c1a0d114604091d28060100460f071e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 21, 2018.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-13787 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 99.23**

 

 

**CONSENT OF DMA,Dan Mackie & Associates**

** **

March 15, 2012

 

Brigus Gold Corp.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

 

**Re: Brigus Gold Corp.**

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We hereby consent to (i) the use of our name in connection withthe following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F forthe year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 40-F”) of Brigus Gold Corp. (the “Company”) to which this consentrelates: (A) the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report, Pre-feasibility Study, Brigus Gold Corp., GoldfieldsProject, Saskatchewan, Canada” dated effective October 6, 2011 (the “Report”), (B) the Company’s AnnualInformation Form for the year ended December 31, 2011 and (C) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis forthe year ended December 31, 2011, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report in theRegistration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-113889, 333-162558 and 333-167757), as amended, and Form F-10 (File No. 333-174604),as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commissionpursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectusesor amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to us included or incorporated by reference in the above-referencedRegistration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.

 

Sincerely,

 

DMA, Dan Mackie & Associates
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION of CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT to SECTION 1350 of CHAPTER 63 of TITLE 18 of the UNITED
STATES CODE,

as ADOPTED PURSUANT to

SECTION 906 of THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report
of Frischs Restaurants, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 18, 2005 (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Registrant certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |     |  |                           
|-------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------
|March 10, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Donald H. Walker      
|               |  |     |  | Donald H. Walker          
|               |  |     |  | Vice President-Finance and
|               |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer   

This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a  14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that
Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as other otherwise stated in such filing.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LEGAL ENTITY                                  COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
<S>                                           <C>
100% SUBSIDIARY ASML HOLDING N.V.:
ASML Netherlands B.V.                         Netherlands (Veldhoven)
ASML Finance B.V.                             Netherlands (Veldhoven)
ASML MaskTools B.V.                           Netherlands (Veldhoven)
ASML Subholding B.V.                          Netherlands (Veldhoven)
ASML Germany GmbH                             Germany (Dresden)
ASML S.a.r.l.                                 France (Montbonnot)
ASML (UK) Ltd.                                UK (Paisley (Scotland))
ASML Information Systems Ltd                  Israel (Ramat-Gan)
ASML Ireland Ltd.                             Ireland (Dublin)
ASML Italy S.r.l.                             Italy (Avezzano)
ASML Hong Kong Ltd.                           Hong Kong SAR
ASML Singapore Pte. Ltd.                      Singapore
ASML Korea Co. Ltd.                           Korea (Kyunggi-Do)
ASML Japan Co. Ltd.                           Japan (Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa-Ken)
ASML Shanghai Int. Trading Co. Ltd.           China/ Shanghai Free Trade Zone
ASML (China) Co. Ltd.                         China (Tianjin)
ASML Taiwan Ltd.                              Republic of China (Hsinchu)
ASML Equipment Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.             Malaysia (Penang)
ASML US, Inc                                  US (Delaware)
100% SUBSIDIARY ASML US, INC.:
ASML Capital US, Inc.                         US (Delaware)
SVG International Service                     US (California)
Lehrer Pearson, Inc.                          US (Delaware)
ASML MaskTools Inc.                           US (Delaware)
ASML Participations US, Inc.                  US (Delaware)
33% SUBSIDIARY ASML US, INC.:
Axiomatic Design Software, Inc.               US (Delaware)
100% SUBSIDIARY ASML SUBHOLDING B.V.:
ASML-Micronic Joint Venture Company, Ltd.     Ireland (Dublin)
100% SUBSIDIARY ASML (UK) LTD:
SVG Europe Ltd.                               UK (Radlett)
100% SUBSIDIARY SVG EUROPE LTD.:
ASML Radlett Ltd                              UK (Radlett)
100% SUBSIDIARY ASML RADLETT LTD.:
SVG Thermal (UK) Ltd.                         UK (Radlett)
100% SUBSIDIARY ASML HONG KONG LTD.:
ASML Macau Commercial Offshore Ltd.           Macau
50% SUBSIDIARY ASML PARTICIPATIONS US, INC.:
eLith LLC                                     US (Delaware)
</TABLE>
#### Wankard POOSER, Petitioner, v. Earl BAXTER et al., Respondents.

No. 43680.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 14, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Assessing Data Reliability

(3 hours)

Course Overview 

A sound audit and final report are only as good as the data on which they are based. As a result, 

assessing and reporting on the reliability of the data are key for any performance audit. This 3-

hour course covers a number of topics related to assessing data reliability including when an 

assessment is needed and what a data reliability framework looks like. Through lecture, 

examples, and exercises, it covers the process an audit team should go through to plan the 

assessment, test the data, and evaluate and document the results.

CPEs: 3

Who Should Attend 

This course is designed to help federal, state or local government auditors understand the 

foundation and steps involved in a data reliability assessment. As such, it can be useful for new 

auditors and seasoned ones who may want a refresher on how to enhance data reliability in 

their work.

Course Objectives 

Participants will be better able to

• Understand data reliability and whether an assessment is needed

• Plan and conduct a data reliability assessment

• Make a data reliability determination

• Document and report the results of a data reliability assessment

Course Topics

Understanding Data Reliability

• Link to Government Auditing Standards

• Definitions of data and reliability

• GAO guidance on assessing data reliability 

• Determining when an assessment is needed

• Overview of data assessment framework

Assessing Data Reliability

• Factors to consider

• Common steps
o Review existing information

o Interview staff

o Test data

o Use source records

o Consider information system controls

Determining Data Reliability

• Sufficiently reliable

• Not sufficiently reliable

• Undetermined reliability

Reporting on Data Reliability

• Documenting the assessment

• Examples for reporting on data reliability
#### JAMES W. BACON, garnishee of MELSON, d. b. app’t. *vs.*PHILIP W. MATTHEWS, p. b. resp’t.

Fees of witnesses not sworn disallowed.

Costs of attachment to be paid by the party, unless otherwise ordered.

Taxation of costs. Exceptions—1. To the fees of witnesses, Melson and Dulaney, who were not examined in the cause; 2. to the *386costs of attachments against them; and 3. to an item in the clerk’s bill, for copies of records furnished.

The witnesses had been in attendance previous to the day of trial, but did not attend on that day ; they were attached but did not arrive until the cause was ended.

*By the*Court.

All the costs on the attachments are disallowed. If a party take out an attachment, it is at his own costs, unless the witness be discharged on other terms. The witness is liable for the attachment costs, until so discharged.

The prothonotary’s charges, for copies cannot be disallowed, without an affidavit denying that they were furnished.

' Disallow the fees of witnesses Melson and Dulaney. The materiality of witnesses cannot be known, unless they are sworn. Que. ? Could they recover any witness fees, when they deprive the party of their evidence, by final neglect to appear ?