# Official Journal C 406/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 406 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 622 December 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 406

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 622 December 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2019/C 406/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2019/C 406/02 | Appointment of the First Advocate General | 2 |
| 2019/C 406/03 | Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 107 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (urgent preliminary ruling procedure) | 2 |
| 2019/C 406/04 | Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 193 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (review of decisions given on appeal) | 2 |
| 2019/C 406/05 | Election of the Presidents of the Chambers of three Judges | 2 |
| 2019/C 406/06 | Taking of the oath by new Members of the Court | 3 |
| 2019/C 406/07 | Assignment of Judges to Chambers | 3 |
| 2019/C 406/08 | Lists for the purposes of determining the composition of the formations of the Court | 3 |
| | General Court |
| 2019/C 406/09 | Taking of the oath by new Members of the General Court | 6 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2019/C 406/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

1

Court of Justice

2019/C 406/02

Appointment of the First Advocate General

2

2019/C 406/03

Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 107 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (urgent preliminary ruling procedure)

2

2019/C 406/04

Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 193 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (review of decisions given on appeal)

2

2019/C 406/05

Election of the Presidents of the Chambers of three Judges

2

2019/C 406/06

Taking of the oath by new Members of the Court

3

2019/C 406/07

Assignment of Judges to Chambers

3

2019/C 406/08

Lists for the purposes of determining the composition of the formations of the Court

3

General Court

2019/C 406/09

Taking of the oath by new Members of the General Court

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2019/C 406/10 | Case C-228/19 P: Appeal brought on 13 March 2019 by ETI Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 17 January 2019 in Case T-368/18, ETI Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ v EUIPO — Grupo Bimbo (ETI Bumbo) | 7 |
| 2019/C 406/11 | Case C-278/19 P: Appeal brought on 3 April 2019 by Mas Que Vinos Global, S.L. against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 17 January 2019 in Case T-576/17, Mas Que Vinos Global, S.L. v EUIPO — JESA (EL SEÑORITO) | 7 |
| 2019/C 406/12 | Case C-295/19 P: Appeal brought on 10 April 2019 by Apple Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 31 January 2019 in Case T-215/17: Pear Technologies v EUIPO - Apple (PEAR) | 8 |
| 2019/C 406/13 | Case C-585/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 2 August 2019 — Academia de Studii Economice din București v Organismul Intermediar pentru Programul Operațional Capital Uman — Ministerul Educației Naționale | 8 |
| 2019/C 406/14 | Case C-619/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 August 2019 — Land Baden-Württemberg v D.R. | 9 |
| 2019/C 406/15 | Case C-635/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Órgano Administrativo de Recursos Contractuales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi (Spain) lodged on 26 August 2019 — Confederación Sindical Comisiones Obreras de Euskadi v Ayuntamiento de Arrigorriaga | 10 |
| 2019/C 406/16 | Case C-644/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania) lodged on 28 August 2019 — FT v Universitatea ‘Lucian Blaga’ Sibiu, GS and Others, and Ministerul Educației Naționale | 10 |
| 2019/C 406/17 | Case C-645/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 30 August 2019 — Facebook Ireland Limited, Facebook Inc., Facebook Belgium BVBA v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit | 11 |
| 2019/C 406/18 | Case C-654/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 3 September 2019 — FP Passenger Service v Austrian Airlines AG | 12 |
| 2019/C 406/19 | Case C-657/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 4 September 2019 —Tax Office D v E | 13 |
| 2019/C 406/20 | Case C-661/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 6 September 2019 — flightright GmbH v Austrian Airlines AG | 13 |
| 2019/C 406/21 | Case C-667/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 9 September 2019 — A.M. v E.M. | 14 |
| 2019/C 406/22 | Case C-695/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 20 September 2019 — Rádio Popular — Electrodomésticos, S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira | 15 |
| 2019/C 406/23 | Case C-699/19 P: Appeal brought on 20 September 2019 by Quanta Storage, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 July 2019 in Case T-772/15: Quanta Storage, Inc. v European Commission | 16 |
| 2019/C 406/24 | Case C-701/19 P: Appeal brought on 20 September 2019 by Pilatus Bank plc against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 10 July 2019 in Case T-687/18: Pilatus Bank v European Central Bank (ECB) | 17 |
| 2019/C 406/25 | Case C-711/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 25 September 2019 — Admiral Sportwetten GmbH and Others | 18 |
| | General Court |
| 2019/C 406/26 | Case T-615/15 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — LL v Parliament (Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Limitation) | 19 |
| 2019/C 406/27 | Case T-125/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — BASF Grenzach v ECHA (REACH — Evaluation of substances — Triclosan — ECHA decision requesting further information — Article 51(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Action brought before the Board of Appeal — Task of the Board of Appeal — Adversarial nature of the procedure — Scope of the review — Intensity of the review — Powers of the Board of Appeal — Article 93(3) of Regulation No 1907/2006 — First sentence of Article 47(1) of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Relevant information — Proportionality — Article 25 of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Annex XIII to Regulation No 1907/2006 — Data obtained under relevant circumstances — Persistence — Neurotoxicity — Reproductive toxicity — Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 — Delay in the submission of a scientific opinion) | 20 |
| 2019/C 406/28 | Case T-467/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 —Barata v Parliament (Action for annulment — Civil service — Selection procedure for contract staff — Recruitment — Call for expressions of interest EP/CAST/S/16/2016 — Drivers — Practical and theoretical tests organised following the establishment of a database — Failure in the theoretical test — Annulment of the call for expressions of interest and voiding of the database — Action which has become devoid of purpose — Continuing interest in bringing proceedings — No need, in part, to adjudicate — Inadmissibility in part) | 21 |
| 2019/C 406/29 | Case T-610/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — ICL-IP Terneuzen and ICL Europe Coöperatief v Commission (REACH — Substances subject to authorisation — Inclusion of 1-bromoproprane (nPB) in Annex XIV to Regulation No 1907/2006 — Volumes — Registration dossier — Data — Substance grouping — Principle of sound administration — Right to conduct business and pursue a trade freely — Obligation to state reasons — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment) | 22 |
| 2019/C 406/30 | Case T-636/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — PlasticsEurope v ECHA (REACH — Establishment of a list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Supplement to the entry relating to the substance bisphenol A on that list — Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Manifest error of assessment — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality) | 22 |
| 2019/C 406/31 | Case T-650/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Jinan Meide Casting v Commission (Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1146 — Imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in China, manufactured by Jinan Meide Castings Co., Ltd — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Resumption of the procedure following the partial annulment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 430/2013 — Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Normal value — Fair comparison — Non-matching product types — Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Determination of injury) | 23 |
| 2019/C 406/32 | Case T-673/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest and Others v Commission (State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Concept of economic activity — Services of general economic interest — Non-economic activities — Severability — Selectivity — Article 93 TFEU and Article 106(2) TFEU) | 24 |
| 2019/C 406/33 | Case T-674/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Port de Bruxelles and Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v Commission (State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Concept of economic activity — Services of general economic interest — Non-economic activities — Severability — Selectivity — Article 93 TFEU and Article 106(2) TFEU) | 25 |
| 2019/C 406/34 | Case T-696/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Havenbedrijf Antwerpen and Maatschappij van de Brugse Zeehaven v Commission (State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Concept of economic activity — Services of general economic interest — Non-economic activities — Separable nature — Selective nature — Request for a transitional period) | 26 |
| 2019/C 406/35 | Case T-755/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 –Germany v ECHA (REACH — Evaluation of substances — Benpat — Persistence — ECHA decision requesting further information — Article 51(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Action brought before the Board of Appeal — Task of the Board of Appeal — Adversarial procedure — Nature of review — Intensity of review — Powers of the Board of Appeal — Article 93(3) of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Conferral of powers on EU agencies — Principle of conferral — Principle of subsidiarity — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons) | 27 |
| 2019/C 406/36 | Case T-783/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 – GE Healthcare v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Suspension of the marketing authorisation for gadolinium-containing contrast agents — Articles 31 and 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC — Precautionary principle — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Impartiality) | 28 |
| 2019/C 406/37 | Case T-47/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — UZ v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Psychological harassment — Disciplinary sanction — Downgrading by one grade and resetting of promotion points to zero — Rejection of the applicant’s request for assistance — Manner in which the administrative investigation was carried out — Requirement of impartiality — Right to be heard — Procedural irregularity — Consequences of the procedural irregularity) | 28 |
| 2019/C 406/38 | Case T-287/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — M.I. Industries v EUIPO — Natural Instinct (Nature’s Variety Instinct) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Nature’s Variety Instinct — Earlier national figurative mark Natural Instinct Dog and Cat food as nature intended — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 29 |
| 2019/C 406/39 | Case T-288/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — M.I. Industries v EUIPO — Natural Instinct (NATURE’S VARIETY INSTINCT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark NATURE’S VARIETY INSTINCT — Earlier national figurative mark Natural Instinct Dog and Cat food as nature intended — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 30 |
| 2019/C 406/40 | Case T-367/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Sixsigma Networks Mexico v EUIPO — Marijn van Oosten Holding (UKIO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark UKIO — Earlier EU figurative mark representing two diagonal lines followed by a vertical line and a circle — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 31 |
| 2019/C 406/41 | Case T-378/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — NHS v EUIPO — HLC SB Distribution (CRUZADE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark CRUZADE — Earlier EU figurative mark SANTA CRUZ — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark) | 31 |
| 2019/C 406/42 | Case T-716/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — The Logistical Approach v EUIPO — Idea Groupe (Idealogistic Compass Greatest care in getting it there) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Idealogistic Compass Greatest care in getting it there — Earlier international figurative mark IDÉA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 32 |
| 2019/C 406/43 | Case T-67/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Sixsigma Networks Mexico v EUIPO — Dokkio (DOKKIO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark DOKKIO — Earlier EU figurative mark representing two diagonal lines followed by a vertical line and a circle — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 33 |
| 2019/C 406/44 | Case T-632/19: Action brought on 23 September 2019 – DD v FRA | 34 |
| 2019/C 406/45 | Case T-640/19: Action brought on 25 September 2019 – Sasol Germany and Others v ECHA | 35 |
| 2019/C 406/46 | Case T-661/19: Action brought on 27 September 2019 – Sasol Germany and Others v Commission | 36 |
| 2019/C 406/47 | Case T-684/19: Action brought on 7 October 2019 — Magyar v Energetikai és Közmű-szabályozási Hivatal v ACER | 37 |
| 2019/C 406/48 | Case T-695/19: Action brought on 11 October 2019 –Falqui v Parliament | 39 |
| 2019/C 406/49 | Case T-698/19: Action brought on 11 October 2019 — FJ and Others v EEAS | 39 |
| 2019/C 406/50 | Case T-699/19: Action brought on 11 October 2019 — FT and Others v Commission | 40 |
| 2019/C 406/51 | Case T-700/19: Action brought on 11 October 2019 – Al-Gaoud v Conseil | 41 |
| 2019/C 406/52 | Case T-704/19: Action brought on 15 October 2019 - FGSZ v ACER | 42 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2019/C 406/10

Case C-228/19 P: Appeal brought on 13 March 2019 by ETI Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 17 January 2019 in Case T-368/18, ETI Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ v EUIPO — Grupo Bimbo (ETI Bumbo)

7

2019/C 406/11

Case C-278/19 P: Appeal brought on 3 April 2019 by Mas Que Vinos Global, S.L. against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 17 January 2019 in Case T-576/17, Mas Que Vinos Global, S.L. v EUIPO — JESA (EL SEÑORITO)

7

2019/C 406/12

Case C-295/19 P: Appeal brought on 10 April 2019 by Apple Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 31 January 2019 in Case T-215/17: Pear Technologies v EUIPO - Apple (PEAR)

8

2019/C 406/13

Case C-585/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 2 August 2019 — Academia de Studii Economice din București v Organismul Intermediar pentru Programul Operațional Capital Uman — Ministerul Educației Naționale

8

2019/C 406/14

Case C-619/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 August 2019 — Land Baden-Württemberg v D.R.

9

2019/C 406/15

Case C-635/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Órgano Administrativo de Recursos Contractuales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi (Spain) lodged on 26 August 2019 — Confederación Sindical Comisiones Obreras de Euskadi v Ayuntamiento de Arrigorriaga

10

2019/C 406/16

Case C-644/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania) lodged on 28 August 2019 — FT v Universitatea ‘Lucian Blaga’ Sibiu, GS and Others, and Ministerul Educației Naționale

10

2019/C 406/17

Case C-645/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 30 August 2019 — Facebook Ireland Limited, Facebook Inc., Facebook Belgium BVBA v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit

11

2019/C 406/18

Case C-654/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 3 September 2019 — FP Passenger Service v Austrian Airlines AG

12

2019/C 406/19

Case C-657/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 4 September 2019 —Tax Office D v E

13

2019/C 406/20

Case C-661/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 6 September 2019 — flightright GmbH v Austrian Airlines AG

13

2019/C 406/21

Case C-667/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 9 September 2019 — A.M. v E.M.

14

2019/C 406/22

Case C-695/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 20 September 2019 — Rádio Popular — Electrodomésticos, S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

15

2019/C 406/23

Case C-699/19 P: Appeal brought on 20 September 2019 by Quanta Storage, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 July 2019 in Case T-772/15: Quanta Storage, Inc. v European Commission

16

2019/C 406/24

Case C-701/19 P: Appeal brought on 20 September 2019 by Pilatus Bank plc against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 10 July 2019 in Case T-687/18: Pilatus Bank v European Central Bank (ECB)

17

2019/C 406/25

Case C-711/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 25 September 2019 — Admiral Sportwetten GmbH and Others

18

General Court

2019/C 406/26

Case T-615/15 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — LL v Parliament (Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Limitation)

19

2019/C 406/27

Case T-125/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — BASF Grenzach v ECHA (REACH — Evaluation of substances — Triclosan — ECHA decision requesting further information — Article 51(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Action brought before the Board of Appeal — Task of the Board of Appeal — Adversarial nature of the procedure — Scope of the review — Intensity of the review — Powers of the Board of Appeal — Article 93(3) of Regulation No 1907/2006 — First sentence of Article 47(1) of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Relevant information — Proportionality — Article 25 of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Annex XIII to Regulation No 1907/2006 — Data obtained under relevant circumstances — Persistence — Neurotoxicity — Reproductive toxicity — Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 — Delay in the submission of a scientific opinion)

20

2019/C 406/28

Case T-467/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 —Barata v Parliament (Action for annulment — Civil service — Selection procedure for contract staff — Recruitment — Call for expressions of interest EP/CAST/S/16/2016 — Drivers — Practical and theoretical tests organised following the establishment of a database — Failure in the theoretical test — Annulment of the call for expressions of interest and voiding of the database — Action which has become devoid of purpose — Continuing interest in bringing proceedings — No need, in part, to adjudicate — Inadmissibility in part)

21

2019/C 406/29

Case T-610/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — ICL-IP Terneuzen and ICL Europe Coöperatief v Commission (REACH — Substances subject to authorisation — Inclusion of 1-bromoproprane (nPB) in Annex XIV to Regulation No 1907/2006 — Volumes — Registration dossier — Data — Substance grouping — Principle of sound administration — Right to conduct business and pursue a trade freely — Obligation to state reasons — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment)

22

2019/C 406/30

Case T-636/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — PlasticsEurope v ECHA (REACH — Establishment of a list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Supplement to the entry relating to the substance bisphenol A on that list — Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Manifest error of assessment — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality)

22

2019/C 406/31

Case T-650/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Jinan Meide Casting v Commission (Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1146 — Imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in China, manufactured by Jinan Meide Castings Co., Ltd — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Resumption of the procedure following the partial annulment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 430/2013 — Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Normal value — Fair comparison — Non-matching product types — Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Determination of injury)

23

2019/C 406/32

Case T-673/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest and Others v Commission (State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Concept of economic activity — Services of general economic interest — Non-economic activities — Severability — Selectivity — Article 93 TFEU and Article 106(2) TFEU)

24

2019/C 406/33

Case T-674/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Port de Bruxelles and Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v Commission (State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Concept of economic activity — Services of general economic interest — Non-economic activities — Severability — Selectivity — Article 93 TFEU and Article 106(2) TFEU)

25

2019/C 406/34

Case T-696/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Havenbedrijf Antwerpen and Maatschappij van de Brugse Zeehaven v Commission (State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Concept of economic activity — Services of general economic interest — Non-economic activities — Separable nature — Selective nature — Request for a transitional period)

26

2019/C 406/35

Case T-755/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 –Germany v ECHA (REACH — Evaluation of substances — Benpat — Persistence — ECHA decision requesting further information — Article 51(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Action brought before the Board of Appeal — Task of the Board of Appeal — Adversarial procedure — Nature of review — Intensity of review — Powers of the Board of Appeal — Article 93(3) of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Conferral of powers on EU agencies — Principle of conferral — Principle of subsidiarity — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons)

27

2019/C 406/36

Case T-783/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 – GE Healthcare v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Suspension of the marketing authorisation for gadolinium-containing contrast agents — Articles 31 and 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC — Precautionary principle — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Impartiality)

28

2019/C 406/37

Case T-47/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — UZ v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Psychological harassment — Disciplinary sanction — Downgrading by one grade and resetting of promotion points to zero — Rejection of the applicant’s request for assistance — Manner in which the administrative investigation was carried out — Requirement of impartiality — Right to be heard — Procedural irregularity — Consequences of the procedural irregularity)

28

2019/C 406/38

Case T-287/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — M.I. Industries v EUIPO — Natural Instinct (Nature’s Variety Instinct) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Nature’s Variety Instinct — Earlier national figurative mark Natural Instinct Dog and Cat food as nature intended — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

29

2019/C 406/39

Case T-288/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — M.I. Industries v EUIPO — Natural Instinct (NATURE’S VARIETY INSTINCT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark NATURE’S VARIETY INSTINCT — Earlier national figurative mark Natural Instinct Dog and Cat food as nature intended — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

30

2019/C 406/40

Case T-367/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Sixsigma Networks Mexico v EUIPO — Marijn van Oosten Holding (UKIO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark UKIO — Earlier EU figurative mark representing two diagonal lines followed by a vertical line and a circle — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

31

2019/C 406/41

Case T-378/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — NHS v EUIPO — HLC SB Distribution (CRUZADE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark CRUZADE — Earlier EU figurative mark SANTA CRUZ — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark)

31

2019/C 406/42

Case T-716/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — The Logistical Approach v EUIPO — Idea Groupe (Idealogistic Compass Greatest care in getting it there) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Idealogistic Compass Greatest care in getting it there — Earlier international figurative mark IDÉA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

32

2019/C 406/43

Case T-67/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Sixsigma Networks Mexico v EUIPO — Dokkio (DOKKIO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark DOKKIO — Earlier EU figurative mark representing two diagonal lines followed by a vertical line and a circle — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

33

2019/C 406/44

Case T-632/19: Action brought on 23 September 2019 – DD v FRA

34

2019/C 406/45

Case T-640/19: Action brought on 25 September 2019 – Sasol Germany and Others v ECHA

35

2019/C 406/46

Case T-661/19: Action brought on 27 September 2019 – Sasol Germany and Others v Commission

36

2019/C 406/47

Case T-684/19: Action brought on 7 October 2019 — Magyar v Energetikai és Közmű-szabályozási Hivatal v ACER

37

2019/C 406/48

Case T-695/19: Action brought on 11 October 2019 –Falqui v Parliament

39

2019/C 406/49

Case T-698/19: Action brought on 11 October 2019 — FJ and Others v EEAS

39

2019/C 406/50

Case T-699/19: Action brought on 11 October 2019 — FT and Others v Commission

40

2019/C 406/51

Case T-700/19: Action brought on 11 October 2019 – Al-Gaoud v Conseil

41

2019/C 406/52

Case T-704/19: Action brought on 15 October 2019 - FGSZ v ACER

42

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2019/C 406/53 | Corrigendum to notice in the Official Journal in Case T-279/19 (OJ C 220 of 1 July 2019) | 44 |

Corrigenda

2019/C 406/53

Corrigendum to notice in the Official Journal in Case T-279/19 (OJ C 220 of 1 July 2019)

(OJ C 220 of 1 July 2019)

44

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN