alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 195 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 195

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 15, 1993.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 5) to amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Railway Labor 
Act to prevent discrimination based on participation in labor disputes. The 
first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and to the amendments made in order by this resolution and 
shall not exceed two hours, with 60 minutes equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Education and 
Labor, 30 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 30 minutes equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Public Works and Transportation. After general debate the bill 
shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule and shall be 
considered as read. The amendments recommended by the Committee on Education and 
Labor now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted in the House and in 
the Committee of the Whole. No further amendment shall be in order except those 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 
Each amendment may be offered only in the order printed, may be offered only by 
the named proponent or a designee, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent, and shall not be subject to amendment. Points of 
order against the amendment printed in the report to be offered by 
Representative Ridge of Pennsylvania for failure to comply with clause 7 of rule 
XVI are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 918 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 918

 To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 
 1991 to provide for greater disclosure of lending to small businesses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 1993

   Mr. Wynn (for himself, Ms. E.B. Johnson of Texas, and Mr. Wilson) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 
 1991 to provide for greater disclosure of lending to small businesses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Lending Disclosure 
Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. GREATER DISCLOSURE OF LENDING TO SMALL BUSINESSES.

    Section 122(c) of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement 
Act of 1991 (12 U.S.C. 1817 nt.) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``may'' and inserting ``shall'';
            (2) in paragraph (1), by striking ``to small businesses.'' 
        and inserting ``to small businesses, and the total number and 
        aggregate dollar amount of applications received for such 
        loans, in each of the following categories (as determined on 
        the basis of the annual sales of the small business):
                    ``(A) Businesses with annual sales of less than 
                $100,000.
                    ``(B) Businesses with annual sales greater than or 
                equal to $100,000 but less than $250,000.
                    ``(C) Businesses with annual sales greater than or 
                equal to $250,000 but less than $500,000.
                    ``(D) Businesses with annual sales greater than or 
                equal to $500,000 but less than $1,000,000.
                    ``(E) Businesses with annual sales greater than or 
                equal to $1,000,000 but less than $10,000,000.''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) The total number and aggregate dollar amount of 
        commercial loans and commercial real estate loans, and the 
        total number and aggregate dollar amount of applications 
        received for such loans, in each of the following categories:
                    ``(A) Minority-owned businesses.
                    ``(B) Startup businesses.
                    ``(C) Businesses in operation for less than 1 year 
                (other than startup businesses).''.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 30573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14145]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 86


Control of Emissions From New and In-Use Highway Vehicles and 
Engines

CFR Correction

    [squf] In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 82 to 
86, revised as of July 1, 2017, on page 1134, following paragraph (b) 
of Sec.  86.1917, the section heading of Sec.  86.1920 is inserted to 
read as follows:


 Sec.  86.1920  What in-use testing information must I report to EPA?

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-14145 Filed 6-28-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301-00-D
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This restated data schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from Boise Cascade Office Products Corporation's Balance Sheet at June 30, 1997,
and from its Statement of Income for the six months ended June 30, 1997.  The
information presented is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          37,516
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  300,719
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,213
<INVENTORY>                                    176,666
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               545,793
<PP&E>                                         278,811
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,814
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,061,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          350,659
<BONDS>                                        240,013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           629
<OTHER-SE>                                     434,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,061,930
<SALES>                                      1,198,341
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,198,341
<CGS>                                          898,754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  898,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               247,085
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,489
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,868
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,621
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,621
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42


</TABLE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 10-K/A
                               (Amendment no. 1)

                       FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS
                    PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Mark One)
x     ANNUAL  REPORT  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  13 OR  15(d)  OF  THE  SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED]
      For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.
                                      OR
o     TRANSITION  REPORT  PURSUANT  TO SECTION  13 OR 15(d) OF THE  SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]
      For the transition period from __________ to __________

                       Commission File Number:   0-25590

                           Datastream Systems, Inc.
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

      Delaware                                    57-0813674
(State or other jurisdiction of         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 incorporation or organization)

50 Datastream Plaza, Greenville, South Carolina   29605
(Address of principal executive offices)         (Zip Code)

      Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (864) 422-5001
       Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  None
          Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
                         Common Stock, $.01 par value
                               (Title of Class)

      Indicate by check mark  whether the  registrant  (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934  during  the  preceding  12 months  (or for such  shorter  period  that the
registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best  of  the  Registrant's   knowledge,  in  definitive  proxy  or  information
statements  incorporated  by  reference  in Part  III of this  Form  10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. o
      Aggregate  market  value of the voting stock held by  non-affiliates  of
the Registrant as of March 31, 1997:  $138,057,651

      Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 31, 1997:
9,151,095

                      DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

      Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement of Datastream Systems, Inc. for
its  Annual  Meeting  of  Stockholders  scheduled  to be held June 13,  1997 are
incorporated  by  reference  into  Part III of this  Report.  Other  than  those
portions specifically  incorporated by reference herein, the Proxy Statement for
the Annual Meeting of  Stockholders  scheduled to be held on June 13, 1997 shall
not be deemed to be filed as part of this Report.


PAGE 1 of 1
#### THE STATE v. J. W. NICOLAY, Appellant.

Division Two,

February 2, 1917.

INDICTMENT: Physician: Prescription for Intoxicating Liquor. The opinion of the Springfield Court of Appeals in this case, -Mo. App.-, 184 S. W. 1183, concerning the sufficiency of an indictment charging defendant as a physician with issuing a certain prescription for intoxicating liquors in violation of Sec. 5784, R. S. 1909, announces the correct rule of law.

*696Appeal from Polk Circuit *Court.*— Hon. *G. H. Skinner,*Judge.

Afeirmeu.

*Re-chow & Pufahl*for appellant.

*John T. Barker,*Attorney-General, and *L. H. Cook*for the State.

WILLIAMS, J.

Under an indictment charging defendant as a physician with issuing a certain prescription for intoxicating liquor in violation of section 5784, Revised Statutes 1909, defendant was tried in the Polk Circuit Court, found guilty, and his punishment assessed at a fine of fifty dollars.' Thereafter an appeal was duly taken by the defendant to the Springfield Court of Appeals and that court wrote an opinion affirming the judgment of the trial court, State v. Nicolay, 184 S. W. 1183. The Springfield Court of Appeals deemed its opinion to be in conflict with the decision of the St. Louis Court of Appeals in the case of State v. Davis, 129 Mo. App. 129, and in pursuance of constitutional authority certified the case here.

The only questions raised upon appeal concern the sufficiency of the indictment. All of the questions raised upon this appeal are fully and ably treated by the Springfield Court of Appeals in its opinion by Farrington, J. We have reached the conclusion that the views therein expressed are sound and that upon the point of conflict the rule announced by the Springfield Court of Appeals should prevail. Under such circumstances it would serve no useful purpose to prolong the discussion here. For. the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Springfield Court of Appeals (citation above), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

All concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 181 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 181

     Providing for the termination of official funding of certain 
                   legislative service organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 1993

 Mr. Roberts submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Providing for the termination of official funding of certain 
                   legislative service organizations.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF OFFICIAL FUNDING OF CERTAIN LEGISLATIVE 
              SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), effective 
July 1, 1993, no legislative service organization may--
            (1) receive amounts from the clerk hire allowance or the 
        official expenses allowance; or
            (2) use office space or any other facility or service that 
        is paid for from official funds.
    (b) Special Rule.--Subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to 
one legislative service organization for each political party 
represented in the House, if such legislative service organization is 
devoted solely to legislative research and legislative support for the 
Members of the House who are affiliated with such political party.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    As used in section 1, the term ``legislative service organization'' 
has the meaning given that term in paragraph (1) of the regulation of 
the Committee on House Administration on legislative service 
organizations, dated October 21, 1981.

                                 <all>
```
August
      4, 2010
              Analyst
      Contact:
              Andrew Ziola918-588-7163Media
      Contact:
              Brad Borror918-588-7582
 ONEOK
Partners to Participate in
 Bank
of America Merrill Lynch Bakken Day
  TULSA,
Okla. –Aug. 4, 2010 --
ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will participate in the Bank of America Merrill
Lynch Bakken Day on Wednesday, Aug. 11, 2010, in Minot, N.D.
  Terry K.
Spencer, ONEOK Partners chief operating officer, will present.
  Presentation
slides will be posted on ONEOK Partners’ website, www.oneokpartners.com, at 5 p.m.
Eastern Daylight Time (4 p.m. Central Daylight Time) on Aug. 11,
2010.
 
 ONEOK
Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited
partnerships and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and
transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier
natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent
and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a
wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy
company, which owns 42.8 percent of the partnership. ONEOK is one of the largest
natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy services operation
focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the
U.S.
  For more
information, visit the Web site at www.oneokpartners.com.
OKS-FV
 
 #
# #
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Berthel Growth & Income Trust I (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
O. Brendengen, Chief Financial Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company Planning,
Inc., the Trust Advisor of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


March 14, 2008                      /s/  Ronald O. Brendengen
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                         Ronald O. Brendengen
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         Berthel Fisher & Company Planning, Inc.
                                         Trust Advisor
                                         Berthel Growth & Income Trust I
#### CITY OF WINTER PARK, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOR the SYNOD OF FLORIDA, etc., Respondent. Earl K. WOOD, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. PRESBYTERIAN HOMES FOR the SYNOD OF FLORIDA, etc., Respondent.

No. 40835.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 12, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 242 So.2d 733.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### DANIEL CANN *vs.*JAMES THOMPSON.

Surveys for laying pretensions must be made on notice.

Parties are to take notice of regular adjournments.

Trespass quare clausum fregit. The plaintiff offered pretensions which were objected to for want of notice. The sheriff proved that he gave notice to the defendant of laying down pretensions on a certain day. The parties and surveyor met at the time appointed and commenced the survey. Before closing they adjourned until the next Tuesday. On that day no one went, it being rainy. The sheriff and surveyor and plaintiff met, on the next day, and made the survey, without any further notice to the defendant.

*Mr. Bates*

objected to the admissibility of the plots on this ground, and because it did not appear that the surveyor was sworn. The sheriff, when sworn, could not recollect whether he swore the surveyor or not.

*The Court*

ruled out the plots. A party having been regularly notified of the time and place of laying down pretensions, is bound by the proceedings not only on that day, but on every subsequent *399day to which the matter is adjourned. But a meeting on a different day is irregular, without special notice to the other party.

*Platt,*for plaintiff.

*Bates,*for defendant.

The plaintiff afterwards had a verdict.
**-----..,....----------~----- -~**  

### S 10-100428-048 City of Little Rock Mark Stodola City Hall, Room 203 Mayor 500 W. Markham little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1427 PhOne: (501) 371·4510

Fax: (501) 371-4498 www.littlerock.org April 15, 2010
The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood Secretary

. U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAve, SE Washington, DC 20590 Docket DOT-OST-2010-_
Dear Mr. Secretary: Thank you for the opportunity to express my support for the application for antitrust immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for oneworld to compete effectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliance. This increased interalliance competition will in tum enhance the benefits ofthe Department's Open Skies policy
- first by solidifying U.S.-Japan Open Skies, then by serving asafoundationforfurther liberalization acrossAsia. After a thorough review, I encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this application as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work·closely together to deliver highly competitive air transportation services

.. Approval for AAlJAL alliance will have a. positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit from having three competitive air alliances to choose from.

. . I urgeyoutoquicklyapprovethis application.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 927 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 235

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 927

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania as the 
                     National Aviary in Pittsburgh.

_______________________________________________________________________

             October 18 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

                       Reported without amendment

                                                       Calendar No. 235
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                               H. R. 927

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 14 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

                                Received

                July 15 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

  Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 
                                 Works

             October 18 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

               Reported by Mr. Baucus, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania as the 
                     National Aviary in Pittsburgh.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is designated as 
the ``National Aviary in Pittsburgh''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or 
other paper of the United States to the aviary referred to in section 1 
is deemed to be a reference to the ``National Aviary in Pittsburgh''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 13, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```