alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION of CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT to SECTION 1350 of CHAPTER 63 of TITLE 18 of the UNITED
STATES CODE,

as ADOPTED PURSUANT to

SECTION 906 of THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report
of Frischs Restaurants, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 10, 2009 (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Registrant certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|-------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|April 10, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Craig F. Maier     
|               |  |  |  |     |  | Craig F. Maier         
|               |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a  14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that
Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as other otherwise stated in such filing.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 09, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 09, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0305. TANYA WHITFIELD v. MACY'S INC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2014CV254756
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,879
<SECURITIES>                                     3,902
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,388
<ALLOWANCES>                                       526
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,643
<PP&E>                                           3,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,736
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            40
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,989
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,319
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,035
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,555
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,555
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
        

</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 676

To amend the amount of grants received under chapter 1 of title I of

the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 1993

Mr. HANSEN (for himself, Mr. ORTON, and Ms. SHEPHERD) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend the amount of grants received under chapter 1

of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education

Act of 1965.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Educational Equity

5 Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMOUNT OF GRANTS.

7 The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of

8 1965 (20 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) is amended—

9 (1) in subparagraph (A) of section 1005(a)(2),

10 by striking the second sentence and inserting ‘‘The
2

•HR 676 IH

1 amount determined under this sentence shall be the

2 average per pupil expenditure in the United

3 States.’’; and

4 (2) in each of sections 1201(b), 1221(c), and

5 1241(b), by striking ‘‘in the State (or (A) in the

6 case where the average per pupil expenditure in the

7 State is less than 80 percent of the average per

8 pupil expenditure in the United States, of 80 per9 cent of the average per pupil expenditure in the

10 United States, or (B) in the case where the average

11 per pupil expenditure in the State is more than 120

12 percent of the average per pupil expenditure in the

13 United States, of 120 percent of average per pupil

14 expenditure in the United States)’’ and inserting ‘‘in

15 the United States’’.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00058-CR

ROBERT AARON FORD APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. CR12570

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Robert Aaron Ford pled guilty to continuous sexual abuse of a 

child, and the trial court sentenced him to fifty years’ confinement. Appellant filed 

a timely notice of appeal.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as 

counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In the brief, counsel avers that, in 

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

her professional opinion, this appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s brief and motion 

meet the requirements of Anders v. California2 by presenting a professional 

evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for 

relief.3 Appellant declined to file a pro se response to the Anders brief, and the 

State likewise declined to file a brief.

After an appellant’s court-appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on 

the ground that an appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this 

court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record to see if 

there is any arguable ground that may be raised on his behalf.4 Only then may 

we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.5

Because Appellant entered an open plea of guilty, our independent review 

for potential error is limited to potential jurisdictional defects, the voluntariness of 

his plea, error that is not independent of and supports the judgment of guilt, and 

error occurring after entry of the guilty plea.6

 2

386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

3

See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510–11 & n.3 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1991).

4

See id. at 511.

5

See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

6

See Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 619–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); 

Young v. State, 8 S.W.3d 656, 666–67 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).
3

We have carefully reviewed counsel’s brief and the appellate record. We 

agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find 

nothing in the appellate record that arguably might support this appeal.7

 

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s 

judgment.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GARDNER, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: February 26, 2015

 7

See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
# Official Journal C 352E/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2012.352.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 352E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5516 November 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2012.352.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 352E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5516 November 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2012/C 352E/01 | Position (EU) No 10/2012 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety AgencyAdopted by the Council on 4 October 2012 | 1 |
| 2012/C 352E/02 | Position (EU) No 11/2012 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing transitional arrangements for bilateral investment agreements between Member States and third countriesAdopted by the Council on 4 October 2012 | 23 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2012/C 352E/01

Position (EU) No 10/2012 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety AgencyAdopted by the Council on 4 October 2012

1

2012/C 352E/02

Position (EU) No 11/2012 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing transitional arrangements for bilateral investment agreements between Member States and third countriesAdopted by the Council on 4 October 2012

23

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 175 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 175

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require open 
committee meetings and to allow the broadcasting and still photography 
   of any committee meetings or hearings that are open to the public.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 1993

 Ms. Dunn (for herself, Mr. Pombo, Mr. Bachus of Alabama, Mr. Baker of 
   California, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Blute, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. 
Buyer, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Canady, Mr. Castle, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. 
   Crapo, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr. Dickey, Mr. Everett, Mrs. Fowler, Mr. 
  Franks of New Jersey, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Grams, Mr. Greenwood, Mr. 
   Hoekstra, Mr. Hoke, Mr. Horn, Mr. Huffington, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. 
Inglis of South Carolina, Mr. Istook, Mr. Kim, Mr. King, Mr. Kingston, 
  Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. Lazio, Mr. Levy, Mr. Linder, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. 
  McInnis, Mr. McKeon, Mr. Mica, Mr. Miller of Florida, Ms. Pryce of 
  Ohio, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Royce, Mr. Smith of Michigan, Mr. Talent, Mr. 
    Torkildsen, Mr. Portman and Mr. McHugh) submitted the following 
        resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require open 
committee meetings and to allow the broadcasting and still photography 
   of any committee meetings or hearings that are open to the public.

    Resolved, That (a) the first sentence of clause 2(g)(1) of rule XI 
of the Rules of the House of Representatives is amended by inserting 
``because disclosure of matter to be considered would endanger the 
national security or would tend to defame, degrade, or incriminate any 
person'' after ``public'' the second place it appears.
    (b) Clause 3(d) of rule XI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by striking ``is a privilege made available 
by the House and''.
    (c) Clause 3(e) of rule XI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended to read as follows:
    ``(e) Whenever a hearing or meeting conducted by any committee of 
the House is open to the public, those proceedings shall be open to 
television broadcast, radio broadcast, and still photography, or by any 
of such methods of coverage. No committee or subcommittee chairman may 
limit the number of television or still cameras below 2 representatives 
from each medium.''.

                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal L 298/15 N

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 298 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4815 November 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 298

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4815 November 2005

---

| Contents | | Court of Justice | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Amendment of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance | 1 |

Contents

Court of Justice

page

*

Amendment of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Marion PINSKY, Petitioner, v. MILANA’S ITALIAN RESTAURANT et al., Respondents.

No. 43526.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 27, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-12-0041 SAT Date: 11/15/2011

Print Date: 4/1/2014

Related cases : Health related cases: Ecotox related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 3 Health: ; Eco: significant mitigation of toxicity expected, i.e., ~43x

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 1 1 PMN 1 1 1 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: Yes Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; PMN negl; Hyd Pdt negl

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: N o Commen t
Keywords : Keywords: IRR-L,MM WATERPROOFING SENS-L UNCERT NEURO AQUATOX-A,C
Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-12-0041FATE: Estimations for hydrolysis product as , MW 454.21 log Kow = 1.95 (E) log Koc = 6.80 (E) log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E) log Fish BAF = 0.91 (E) PMN Substance: Solid S = Reacts Hydrolysis Half-life = min-hr VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = PMN 90 via hydrolysis; then Hyd Pdt 90 via sorption and possible partial biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = PMN v.strong; Hyd Pdt v.strong PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = PMN negl; Hyd Pdt negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin and poor with reaction through the lung and GI tract based on physical/chemical properties. There is concern for irritation to mucous membranes based on and concern for respiratory sensitization based on the . There also is concern for waterproofing of lung membranes if inhaled based on the use. There is uncertain concern for neurotoxicity based on the

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.73 daphnid 48-h LC50 0.23 green algal 96-h EC50 0.055 fish

_ chronic value 0.040 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.016
algal

_ chronic value 0.014
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for polycationic polymers with SAR chemical class = p olyme r -cationic- MW unknown ( p olymerization in situ); liquid with mp = unk °C (P); S = reacts with water at 20 C (P); p H7;effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; DWhardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DWTOC <2.0 mg/L;
mitigation of toxicity expected in the presence of 10 mg TOC/L, i.e., ~43 times;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 60 with mitigation

SARs p olycationic polymers SAR Class p olyme r -cationicEcotox Category Polycationic Polymers

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
                  
                      
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                        12,391
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                 34,157
<ALLOWANCES>                   1,772
<INVENTORY>                   45,372
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              11,996
<PP&E>                       140,011  
<DEPRECIATION>                91,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               188,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         56,707
<BONDS>                       21,465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                      800
<COMMON>                       2,156
<OTHER-SE>                   102,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 188,023
<SALES>                       88,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             109,814
<CGS>                         48,009
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 61,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              64,218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              (838)
<INCOME-PRETAX>              (17,192)
<INCOME-TAX>                     200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          (17,392)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                 (17,392)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  (0.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (0.87)   
        


</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 69

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide reclassification of members

of the Board of Veterans Appeals and to ensure pay equity between

those members and administrative law judges.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Veterans’ Affairs and Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide reclassification of members of the Board of Veterans Appeals

and to ensure pay equity between those members and

administrative law judges.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLASSIFICATION AND PAY OF MEMBERS OF

4 BOARD OF VETERANS’ APPEALS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7101(b)(2)(A) of title 38,

6 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the

7 following: ‘‘A member of the Board (other than the Chair8 man and Vice Chairman) shall receive compensation under
2

•HR 69 IH

1 the provisions of section 5372 of title 5 and other benefits

2 equal to those payable to an administrative law judge.’’.

3 (b) SAVINGS PROVISION.—The rate of basic pay pay4 able to an individual who is a member of the Board of

5 Veterans’ Appeals on the date of the enactment of this

6 Act may not be reduced by reason of the amendment made

7 by subsection (a) below the rate payable to such individual

8 on the day before the effective date specified in subsection

9 (c).

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

11 subsection (a) shall take effect on the first day of the first

12 pay period beginning after the date of the enactment of

13 this Act.

Æ
-----..,....----------~----- -~ 

S 10-100428-048 

City of Little Rock 

Mark Stodola City Hall, Room 203 Mayor 500 W. Markham 

little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1427 

PhOne: (501) 371·4510 

Fax: (501) 371-4498 

www.littlerock.org 

April 15, 2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary . 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-_ 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express my support for the application for 

antitrust immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American 

Airlines and Japan Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is 

vital for oneworld to compete effectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliance. 

This increased interalliance competition will in tum enhance the benefits of the 

Department's Open Skies policy - first by solidifying U.S.-Japan Open Skies, 

then by serving as a foundation for further liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, I encourage the Department of Transportation to 

approve this application as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to 

work· closely together to deliver highly competitive air transportation services .. 

Approval for AAlJAL alliance will have a. positive impact on air travel by offering 

customers more service, scheduling and pricing options and will help to ensure 

that customers continue to benefit from having three competitive air alliances to 

choose from. 

. . 

I urge you to quickly approve this application.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Gap, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 29, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arthur Peck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:August 24, 2017/s/ Arthur PeckArthur PeckChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Harold Edward PELHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-102.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 24, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.