T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by N i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T I n th e Ma tt e ro f: MOR R Y WAK S B E R G, M .D ., D ebt or, M O R R Y W A K S B E R G , M .D ., A p p e lla n t, v. L E V E N E , N E A L E , B E N D E R , R A N K IN & B R I L L L .L .P .,

A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 56406 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 7 3 9 3 - MMM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M a r ga r e tM . M orr ow , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an d M . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED MA R 04 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 56406 2 T h e in d iv idu al, M o rry W ak sb er g , M .D ., ap p ea ls fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om the bank rupt cycourt ’ s ordergrant i ng L evene, N e a l e , B e nde r , R a nki n & B r i l l L . L . P . ’ s appl i c a t i on f orc om pe ns a t i on i n unde r l y i ng C h ap te r7 p r o c e e d in g s . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 5 8 ( d ) . W e r e v ie w f o ra n ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n . Fi t

zsi m m o n s v. N

o lden (In re Fi t

zsi m m o n s) , 920 F .2 d 1 4 6 8 , 1 4 7 1 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 0 ) . W e v a c a te a n d r e m a n d . T he di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s di s m i s s a l of the appe a l w a s ba s e d on i t s de t e rm i na t i on that , despi t e i t s pre vi ou s ordert o sho w cause det ai l i ng W aksber g’ s proce du ra l obl i ga t i ons a nd i t s e xt e ns i on of t i m e f orc om pl i a nc e , W a ks be r g ha d ne ve rf i l e d a S t a t e m e ntof

the I s s ue s i n the ba nkrupt c yc ourt . H ow e ve r , W a ks be r g f i l e d a S t at em entof the Is sues i n the bank rupt cycourtby the fi nal deadl i ne the di stri ct courthad i m po se d. A l tho ug h the S t at em ent ’ s c apt i on cont ai ned the ca se nu m ber fo r a rel at ed b an k ru p t cy case, causing i tt o b e fi l ed i n th atsep arat e case, i tal so pr om i ne nt l y bor e the c a s e num be r s f orthe ba nkrupt c ya nd di s tr i c tc ourtc a s e s on appe a l he r e . A c c or di ngl y , i tc a nnotbe s a i d tha tW a ks be r g, w ho w a s pr oc e e di ng p r o s e a t th e tim e , f

a ile d to c o m p lyw ith B a n k ru p tc yR u le 8 0 0 6 . See B r o o k fie ld C om m uns . v . W

. C oas t E ntm ’ t C or p. , 17 4 F . 3d 10 36 , 10 46 (9th C i r. 19 99 ) ( a d is tr ic t c o u rt n e c e s s a r ilyab u s e s its d is c r e tio n w h e r e it b a s e s its ru lin g o n ac le a r ly erroneou s f

i nd i ng of fa ct ).09- 56406 3 In l i gh tof ou r di sposi t i on , w e nee d n otre ac h w hether the di stri ctcourt ab u s e d its d is c r e tio n b y d e n y in g W a k s b e r g ’s m o tio n f o rr e c o n s id e r a tio n . T h e p a rtie s s h a ll b e a rth e iro w n c o s ts o n ap p e a l. V AC AT E D a n d RE MAND E D.