alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 243 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 243

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a three-
fifths vote to adopt a rule disallowing germane amendments to a bill or 
                              resolution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 5, 1993

  Mr. Buyer (for himself, Mr. Fawell, Mr. Livingston, Mr. Quinn, Mr. 
  Istook, Mr. Huffington, Mr. Horn, Mr. Everett, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. 
   Greenwood, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Portman, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
  Calvert, Mr. Grams, Mr. Torkildsen, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. McInnis, Mr. 
Miller of Florida, Mr. Inglis of South Carolina, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. 
 McKeon, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. 
Boehlert, Mr. Solomon, Mr. Doolittle, Mrs. Meyers of Kansas, Mr. Goss, 
Mr. Zimmer, Mrs. Fowler, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Linder, Mr. Petri, Mr. McHugh, 
  Mr. Herger, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Ravenel, Mr. 
Ramstad, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. Quillen, Mr. Bachus of Alabama, Mr. Canaday, 
 Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, and Mr. Talent) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a three-
fifths vote to adopt a rule disallowing germane amendments to a bill or 
                              resolution.

    Resolved, That clause 4 of rule XI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(e) The affirmative vote of three-fifths of those voting, a 
quorum being present, is required to adopt any rule or order reported 
by the Committee on Rules providing for the consideration of any bill 
or resolution that limits the right of Members to offer germane 
amendments, if that bill or resolution would otherwise be subject to 
amendment under House rules.''.

                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-848, No. 333-76851,No. 333-79337, No. 333-82257, No. 333-38860, No. 333-66068, No. 333-105620 and 333-120708 of PC Mall, Inc. (formerly IdeaMall, Inc. and Creative Computers, Inc.) of our report dated March 28, 2005, relating to the financial statements,financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 31,2005
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the
Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/  Gerald D. KelferGerald D. KelferPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00342-CV

Alma L. GOMEZ and Alberto F. Gomez, Individually and as Next Friend of Jorge Elias Gomez, 

a Deceased Minor, and on behalf of the Estate of Jorge Elias Gomez, a Deceased Minor; and 

Yolanda Medellin, Individually and as Next Friend of Jesus Medellin,

Appellants

v.

AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.,

Appellee

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-02-26254-MCV

Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order Granting 

American Honda Motor Co., Inc.’s Motion for No-Evidence Summary Judgment and Motion to 

Sever is AFFIRMED.

Costs of appeal are assessed against appellants.

SIGNED July 26, 2017.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
#### ROBERT BARR *vs.*JOHN WEST et al.

A memorandum entry on the docket of “ caveat filed,” is not sufficient to prevent the issuing a patent for vacant land, taken up under a special law providing, in the usual mode, for caveats.

Caveat entered before the recorder of deeds, against the grant of a patent for vacant land.

The defendant, West, under a special act of assembly, passed February 14, 1849, located certain vacant land, and returned and filed a plot and gave notice, as required by the law; the plot being filed September 17, 1849, and notice given September 21,. 1849.

The act provided that a caveat might be entered in the recorder’s office, at any time within three months from the return of the plot and notice; and thereupon, all matters in variance should be heard and determined in a summary way.

Robert Barr went into the recorder’s office on the 11th of December, 1849,•'and entered upon the docket “ caveat filed;” and on the 6th of September, 1850, he drew up and filed the caveat in due form.

*Saulsbury*and *Layton,*for defendants, now moved to dismiss the caveat, as not being filed within time.

*Mr. Cullen,*contra,

contended that the noting the caveat on the caveat docket, was a sufficient entry, and it might be drawn out *320afterwards; and 2. that the application to dismiss was too late, after the parties had been attending with witnesses two terms.

*Cullen,*for plaintiff.

*Saulsbury*and *Layton,*for defendants.

*Mr. Houston,*

on the same side said the caveat was addressed, not to the other party, but to the public officer ; a mere hint to him, admonishing him not to issue the patent, as it was claimed by another. The party who files the plot is seeking a title from the State; the caveator gives notice, by entering a caveat before the register, to prevent the issuing of a patent.

*The Court*

directed an entry, that in this case the court refused to take cognizance of the cause, because it did not appear that any caveat was entered according to law; and it was ordered that each party pay his own costs in this court.
EXHIBIT
23.1




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms
S-8 Nos. 333-06409, 333-25245, 333-35745, 333-57031, 333-68499, 333-83927,
333-86861, 333-32380, 333-46640, 333-58334, 333-73882, 333-99093, 333-100130,
333-112094, 333-118864, 333-131292, 333-133292, 333-138859 and 333-147617) of
SkillSoft Public Limited Company of our reports dated March 30, 2009, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of SkillSoft Public Limited
Company, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
SkillSoft Public Limited Company included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended January 31, 2009.
 
 
   
 Boston,
Massachusetts
 March 30,
2009
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Tina M. Johnston, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of AV Homes, Inc.;

2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                                                     
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2013 |  |  |  | /s/ Tina M. Johnston                                                                                
|                   |  |  |  | Tina M. Johnston
Senior Vice President, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 31.2





I, Daniel
W. Rumsey, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Azzurra Holding
Corporation;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;





4. The
Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), for the Company and have:





a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s
auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):





a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and





b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company’s  internal control over
financial reporting.




Date:
      August 14, 2008
            
            /s/ 
      Daniel W.
      RumseyDaniel
      W. Rumsey
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              and
      Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)
#### AMERICAN MARINE INSURANCE GROUP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEPTUNIA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 1318, Docket 91-9306.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued April 7, 1992.

Decided April 9, 1992.

Harry A. Gavalas, New York City (William M. Cassarini, Chalos, English & Brown, of counsel) for plaintiff-appellant.

Thomas S. Howard, Hackensack, N.J. (Holly B. Tashjian, Kirsch, Gartenberg & Howard, of counsel) for defendant-appellee.

Before: FEINBERG, WINTER, and ALTIMARI, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm for substantially the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order of the District Court in *American Marine Insurance Group v. Neptunia Insurance Co.,*775 F.Supp. 703 (S.D.N.Y.1991).
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
David G. Gullickson, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this 10-K/A of Hyperdynamics Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
October 28, 2016



By:

/s/ DAVID G. GULLICKSONDavid G. Gullickson Principal Financial and Accounting Officer


---



QuickLinks
SCOTT A. THOMPSON 

Executive Director 

February 25, 2016 

OKLAHOMA 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

Mr. Jeffrey Robinson, Chief, Air Permits Section 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency- Region VI (6MM) 

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 

Dallas, TX 75202-2733 

Re: Oklahoma's Pre- and Post-construction Monitoring ofPM2.

5 for the PSD Program 

Dear Mr. Robinson: 

MARY FALLIN 

Governor 

On February 6, 2012, Oklahoma's Secretary of Environment submitted a SIP revision to the Acting 

Regional Administrator of U.S. EPA Region VI. Part of this submittal was an amendment to Subchapter 

8 of the Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC) 252:100, which incorporated the federal Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration (PSD) implementation rule [75 FR 64864, October 20, 201 0] for the 2006 PM25 

NAAQS. 

On January 22, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia vacated the significant 

monitoring concentration (SMC) provision and vacated and remanded the significant impact levels (SILs) 

provisions of EPA's PSD rule. 

In response to the court's decision, the EPA revised 40 CFR § 51.166(i)(5)(i)(c) to change the SMC for 

PM2.5 from 4 f!g/m3

, 24-hour average to 0 f!g/m3• [78 FR 73698, December 9, 2013] The EPA reasoned 

that removal of PM2.5 would have allowed the reviewing authority to grant an exemption from the air 

quality analysis requirements, including pre- and post-construction monitoring, under 40 § CFR 

51.166(i)(5)(iii). OAC 252:100-8-33(c)(l)(C) is part of the aforementioned SIP submittal, and does not 

incorporate EPA's most recent revision to change the SMC for PM2.5 to 0 f!g/m3

• Should OAC 252: I 00-8-

33(c)(l)(C) be disapproved, DEQ offers the following explanation as to how the Department, absent this 

language, would retain the authority to require pre- and post-construction PSD monitoring for PM25 under 

the submitted SIP. 

OAC 252: !00-8-35.l(b)(3) authorizes the Director to request information regarding the air quality impact 

of the source or modification. This request can include the monitoring data required by OAC 252: I 00-8-

35(c) [analogous to 40 CFR 51.166(m)] which the source may otherwise be exempt from providing. This 

provision should satisfY the air quality analysis component of the PSD permitting program requirements. 

If you have questions, please contact Cheryl E. Bradley, Air Quality Division, Department of 

Environmental Quality at ( 405)702-4157. 

p. ~ 

m -~ :::JR:: [T 

-v ~I 

~ !!!;: I ~- co <::J-' 

I {J) 

Sincerely, 

~ 

/ ' 

Eddie Terrill 

Director, Air Quality Division 

""' " {J) ::J;: ,..,., 

""' r::? rn :::! 

0 CJ t::' 

cc: Adina Wiley 

707 NORTH ROBINSON, P.O. BOX 1677, OKLAHOMA Cll'l, OKLAHOMA 731 01·1677 

:!!::: 00 printed on recycled paper with soy ink 

0
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Claude E. WOODS and Joseph L. Woods v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, etc., et al.

No. 53905.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 14, 1973.

In re: Claude E. Woods and Joseph L. Woods applying for writs of prohibition, mandamus, habeas corpus and remedial writs.

Writ refused. Applicant having been re-sentenced on Sept. 11, 1973 in the 18th Judicial District Court, the matter before us is moot.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 185 Agreed to House (ATH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 185

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 1993

Mr. Michel submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That Rob Portman of Ohio be, and is hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives: the 
Committee on Government Operations and the Committee on Small Business.

                                 <all>
```
|   | 1. | The Report      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November  7,      2008 | /s/      Guomin Li                                                                                       |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                               | Guomin      Li                                                                                                     |
|                                               | President, Chief Executive      Officer, Chief      Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer,      Director |
[No. 607-2.

Division Two.

February 15, 1972.]

#### Gordon V. Stenner, *Respondent,*v. Martin J. Swanson *et al., Appellants.*
H. Res. 119

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

March 10, 1993.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4) to amend the Public Health Service Act to

revise and extend the programs of the National Institutes of

Health, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration

of the bill for failure to comply with clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI

are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

on Energy and Commerce. After general debate the bill shall

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It

shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Energy and Commerce now printed in the bill. The
2

HRES 119 EH

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be

considered as read. No amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except

those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each amendment may be offered only

in the order printed and by the named proponent or a designee, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the

time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by

the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to

amendment except as specified in the report, and shall not

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the

House or in the Committee of the Whole. At the conclusion

of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee

shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand

a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in

the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee

amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

After passage of H.R. 4, it shall be in order to take from the

Speaker’s table the bill S. 1 and to consider the Senate bill

in the House. It shall then be in order to move to strike all

after the enacting clause of the Senate bill and to insert in
3

HRES 119 EH

lieu thereof the provisions of H.R. 4 as passed by the House.

If the motion is adopted and the Senate bill, as amended, is

passed, then it shall be in order to move that the House insist on its amendment to S. 1 and request a conference with

the Senate thereon.

Attest:

Clerk.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 10

Providing that the House proceed to the West Front of the Capitol on

Wednesday, January 20, 1993, at 10:30 a.m. for the purpose of attending the inaugural ceremonies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. GEPHARDT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Providing that the House proceed to the West Front of

the Capitol on Wednesday, January 20, 1993, at 10:30

a.m. for the purpose of attending the inaugural ceremonies.

Resolved, That at 10:30 ante meridiem on Wednesday,

January 20, 1993, the House shall proceed to the West

Front of the Capitol for the purpose of attending the inaugural ceremonies of the President and Vice President of the

United States.

Æ
#### E. B. HATCHER and Lottie M. Hatcher, his wife; Roy Brown, et al., Wanda Sweetz, Roy Brown, et al., Doyle Polk and Constance Faye Polk, his wife; Roy Brown, et al., Appellants, v. MARION COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. L-294-L-296.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 3, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.