alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021471EN.01006401.xml

| 22.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 471/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 471/64

---

Action brought on 4 October 2021 — Target Brands v EUIPO — The a.r.t. company b&s (ART CLASS)

(Case T-637/21)

(2021/C 471/89)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Target Brands, Inc. (Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States) (represented by: R. Kunze, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The a.r.t. company b&s, SA (Quel, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark ART CLASS — Application for registration No 16 888 695

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 June 2021 in Case R 1597/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal as well as the Opposition Division. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal as well as the Opposition Division.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 267 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 267

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     October 4, 1993.  
    Resolved, That Representative Michael N. Castle of Delaware be, and is 
hereby, elected to the Committee on Education and Labor.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 I, Edward W. Wilhelm, certify that the Form 10-K for the year ended January 25,
2004, of Borders Group, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Borders Group, Inc. Date: March 25, 2004/s/ EDWARD W. WILHELM


Edward W. Wilhelm
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Borders Group, Inc.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Borders Group, Inc. and will be retained by Borders Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Vina A. HOLLOWAY, widow and surviving spouse of Jack V. Holloway, Deceased, and Vina Aplin Holloway, Executrix of the Estate of Jack V. Holloway, Deceased, Appellants, v. E. M. HOOPER et al., Appellees.

No. 73-274.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 26, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Claude R. Edwards, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
256 La. 857

#### Emanuel STATION, Individually and on Behalf of and as Administrator of the Estate of his Minor Daughter, Geraldine Station v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY and the East Baton Rouge Parish School Board.

No. 50768.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 30, 1970.

In re: Travelers Insurance Company and the East Baton Rouge Parish School Board applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 236 So.2d 610.

Writ refused. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is not final.
# Official Journal L 185/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 185 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5725 June 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 185

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5725 June 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 650/2014 of 4 June 2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the format, structure, contents list and annual publication date of the information to be disclosed by competent authorities in accordance with Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 650/2014 of 4 June 2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the format, structure, contents list and annual publication date of the information to be disclosed by competent authorities in accordance with Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. 24 - 0079 IN THE MATTER OF L.S.M., Respondent and Appellant . **G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until May 20 , 2024 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court April 15 2024

04/15/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0079
#### Samuel Proctor BRADY et al., Appellants, v. Nancy Lucas CREWS, Appellee.

No. 72-657.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 11, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 174 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 174

Impeaching Robert F. Collins, judge of the United States District Court 
for the Eastern District of Louisiana, for bribery and high crimes and 
                             misdemeanors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 1993

 Mr. Canady submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Impeaching Robert F. Collins, judge of the United States District Court 
for the Eastern District of Louisiana, for bribery and high crimes and 
                             misdemeanors.

    Resolved, That Robert F. Collins, judge of the United States 
District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, is impeached for 
bribery and high crimes and misdemeanors.

                                 <all>
```
September 16, 2014

Memorandum

Subject: September 15 and 16, 2014 Voicemail messages between the Fond du

Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA)

From: Lisa Beckham, Environmental EngineeLkJ~

Air Permits Office

EPA Region 9

To: Docket- EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0151

This memorandum to docket provides a brief summary of the main discussion

points made in the subject voicemails during the comment period for the proposed

rule: “General Permits and Permits by Rule for the Federal Minor New Source

Review Program in Indian Country.” (79 Federal Register 41846, July 17, 2014)

Phone call details:

When: Voicemail received from Joy Wiecks on September 15, 2014, voicemail

left with Joy Wiecks on September 15, 2014

Participants: Lisa Beckham, EPA, Region 9

Joy Wiecks, Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa

The Fond du Lac representative requested a clarification regarding the requirement

to comply with certain existing EPA standards in the compression ignition and spark

ignition engines in the draft general permits. The EPA answered the question and

offered to be available if the Fond du Lac representative had any further questions.

This memorandum will be filed in the docket for the proposed rule and will be

available for public review.
##### 



Exhibit 3.4
 
 The First State
     (IMAGE)
    
    /s/Harriet Smith WindsorHarriet Smith Windsor, Secretary of State
      AUTHENTICATION: 4104797                  DATE: 08-19-05




---



##### 



State of DelawareSecretary of StateDivision of Corporations Delivered 08:59 AM 08/19/2005FILED 05:01 PM 08/19/2005SRV 050685552  2060538 FILE
        (i)
    
    TECHNOLOGY VISIONS GROUP, INC, which is incorporated under the laws
of Delaware; and(ii)
    
    SUTURA, INC, which is incorporated under the laws of the State of
Delaware.




---



##### 



TECHNOLOGY VISIONS GROUP, INC.By:
    
    /s/ James B. LaheyName:
    
    James B. LaheyTitle:
    
    PRES/CEOJames B. LeheySUTURA, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Anthony A. NoblesName:
    
    Anthony A. NoblesTitle:
    
    PRES/CEOAnthony A. Nobles
 - 2 -
#### Robert E. DUERK, Appellant, v. Arthur W. BREITWEISER, Jr. and Anchor Cash Register, Inc., Appellees.

No. 69-172.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 4, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 26, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2020247EN.01002601.xml

| 27.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/26

---

Action brought on 15 May 2020 — Facegym v EUIPO (FACEGYM)

(Case T-289/20)

(2020/C 247/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Facegym Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark FACEGYM — Application for registration No. W1 466 456

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 February 2020 in Case R 70/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

alternatively

| — | alter the contested decision so that it is now held that the allegedly offending goods and services of the International Trade Mark Registration do not offend against Article 7(1)(b) or (c); |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision so that it is now held that the allegedly offending goods and services of the International Trade Mark Registration do not offend against Article 7(1)(b) or (c);

| — | order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this application and the costs below. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this application and the costs below.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) or (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) or (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Western Sierra Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Chaffee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: October 2, 2008

/s/ Michael M. ChaffeeMichael ChaffeeChief Executive Officer

1

---
#### A-1 TRUCK RENTALS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Thomas VILBERG, Appellee.

No. 67-809.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 12, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### SHEPHERD P. HOUSTON, late Clerk of the Peace and Clerk of the Levy Court *vs.*THE LEVY COURT OF SUSSEX COUNTY.

A mandamus will not be issued requiring the Levy Court to determine in a matter discretionary, unless there has been a refusal to exercise any discretion on the subject.

Rule on sundry persons, members of the Levy Court, to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue against them, requiring them to allow and pay the relator’s account against the county, for services as clerk of the peace and clerk of the Levy Court. [See ante., p. 15.] The rule was served on the members individually.

Mr. Houston presented his account as clerk of the peace, for which the compensation is fixed, amounting to $204 90, which was allowed. He then presented an account for services as clerk of the Levy Court, amounting to $884 10, for which services the compensation is generally discretionary, on which there was allowed $500; stating that it was for his services in both capacities.

*The Court*

discharged the rule, it appearing to the court that this whole claim had been before the Levy Court, and that they had *109allowed $704 94, to the relator for his services as clerk of the Levy Court, and also as clerk of the peace; which sum exceeds the amount of any demand he had against them, for which the compensation is fixed by law. It appearing, therefore, to the court that the residue of the services were such as that the allowance for them was discretionary, and that a sum had been allowed towards that, the relator’s counsel did not think proper to go further into the case, and the court

Discharged the rule.
#### JAMISON COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, Appellant, v. UNIVERSAL MARION CORPORATION, a corporation, d/b/a Universal Southern Company, Appellee.

No. 0-354.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 30, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 26, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Jose R. TORNA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-375.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 25, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 15, 1978.

Whitman, Wolfe & Gross and Donald F. Frost, Miami, for appellant.

*1110Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Jose R. Rodriguez and Steven R. Jacob, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before KEHOE, J., and BOYD, JOSEPH A., Jr., Associate Judge and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, e. g., *State ex rel. Butler v. Cullen,*253 So.2d 861 (Fla.1971); *Jester v. State,*339 So.2d 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *Crawford v. State,*334 So.2d 141 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *Wigfall v. State,*323 So.2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); *Rosenwasser v. Smith,*308 So.2d 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Section 933.09, Florida Statutes (1975); and Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.190.
#### Richard GODFREY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1242.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 29, 1973.

Rehearing Denied June 11, 1973.

*326Roberta Fulton Fox, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Peter F. LaPorte, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J„ and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was charged in a nineteen count information with commission of o-f-fenses in violation of provisions of Chapter 517 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., the Sale of Securities Act. On trial before a jury the appellant was found guilty of unlawful sale of unregistered securities as charged in counts numbered six, eight, twelve, fourteen and eighteen. On each of those five convictions the appellant was sentenced to imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of five years, with provision that they be served consecutively. However, by subsequent order provision was made for the five sentences to be served concurrently.

Also upon the trial the appellant was found guilty of unlawful sales of securities through unlicensed salesmen, as charged in counts numbered seven, nine, thirteen, fifteen and nineteen, for which the appellant was sentenced to serve seven days in the Dade County jail.

On. this appeal by the defendant below, fifteen questions or points are presented. Basically, the appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions; that certain rulings of the court in the course of the trial, relating to evidence and as to instructions given or refused constituted reversible error; and that the several five-year sentences (to be served concurrently), although provided for by law, constitute cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Florida Constitution.

No useful purpose would be served by a detailed statement and discussion of the numerous points presented. They have been carefully considered by the court in light of the record, briefs and argument, and we are impelled to conclude that no reversible error has been shown. It is settled law in this state that a sentence of imprisonment for a period which it is provided by law may be imposed upon conviction for an offense is not cruel and unusual punishment. Brown v. State, 152 Fla. 853, 13 So.2d 458; Cole v. State, Fla. App.1972, 262 So.2d 902, 903.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

December 4, 1996

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Dear Sirs:

We are aware that the November 3, 1996 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General
Host Corporation which includes our report dated December 4, 1996 (issued
pursuant to the provisions of Statements on Auditing Standards No. 71 and 42),
is incorporated by reference in its Registration Statement No. 33-50020 on Form
S-8 filed on July 27, 1992.  We are also aware of our responsibilities under
the Securities Act of 1933.


Yours very truly,

Price Waterhouse LLP
Detroit, Michigan
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         107,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,161,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                    29,300
<INVENTORY>                                     25,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,271,300
<PP&E>                                       4,772,400
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,803,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,467,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,381,400
<BONDS>                                        889,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     21,200
<COMMON>                                       585,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     183,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,467,300
<SALES>                                        841,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               841,000
<CGS>                                          312,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  649,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                163,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                    63,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             99,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    99,600
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          21,502
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  632,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                    57,876
<INVENTORY>                                     26,811
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               696,644
<PP&E>                                       8,684,382
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,197,598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,733,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          999,644
<BONDS>                                      1,265,094
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     81,866
<COMMON>                                     1,388,764
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,190
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,733,871
<SALES>                                      2,041,657
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,041,657
<CGS>                                          724,704
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,518,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                455,853
<INCOME-TAX>                                   177,918
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            277,935
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   277,935
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>