alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviotion 

Administration 

June 21,2011 

Office of the Chief Counsel 800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, D,C, 20591 

FACSIMILE and CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

The Honorable Richard C, Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Facsimile: 202-366-7536 

Re: DOT Docket No, CPI0CE0003 

Dear Judge Goodwin: 

I hereby file my Notice of Appearance in this matter. Going forward, I will be the 

attorney of record and all conununications for the Federal Aviation Administration 

should be addressed to Charles Raley, Attorney, Enforcement DivisionlAGC-300, Office 

of the Chief Counsel, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, S.W., 

'Washington, D.C. 20591, (202) 267-3357, facsimile (202) 267-5106. ' 

Sincerely, 

Peter Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

for Enforcement 

By: _~_===--="""" __ Charles Raley, Attorney 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Phone: (202) 267-3357 

Facsimile: (202) 267-5106 

Email: charles.raley@faa.gov 

JUN 23 
Cc: David J. A. Hayes, III, Esq. 

Vice President & General Counsel 

Trans State Airlines Inc. 

11495 Natural Bridge Rd., Suite 303 

Bridgeton, M063044 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000
#### PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, self-insured, Petitioner, v. George SIMS and the Industrial Relations Commission of the Florida Department of Commerce, Respondents.

No. 44122.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 15, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ„ concur.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 12

                   GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY
        Statement of the Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

(Dollars in Millions)                                              Three Months Ended
                                                                     March 31, 2000
                                                                    -----------------
<S>                                                                 <C>
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income from continuing operations                                 $           213.4
  Add - Income taxes                                                            148.6
      - Fixed charges                                                            40.3
                                                                    -----------------
Adjusted earnings                                                   $           402.3
                                                                    =================
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                                  $            36.8
  Portion of rent expense representing interest                                   3.5
                                                                    -----------------
Adjusted fixed charges                                              $            40.3
                                                                    =================

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                                               9.98
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gold Standard, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Scott L. Smith, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



Date: 9/12/03                             /s/Scott L. Smith
     --------                             ------------------------
                                          Scott L. Smith
                                          President and Chief Financial
                                          Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                    Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



     I, Christopher M. Rasmussen, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer), certify that this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained herein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Gateway Energy Corporation and
its subsidiaries for the periods presented.


Date:  August 13, 2009                      /s/  Christopher M. Rasmussen
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Christopher M. Rasmussen
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 (Principal Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 23.2



                      Albright, Persing & Associates, Ltd.

                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                          1025 Ridgeview Dr., Suite 300
                               Reno, Nevada 89509



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-51640, 333-48990, 333-38560, 333-32586, and 333-92119 on Form S-3 and
Registration Statement No. 333-44786 on Form S-8 of HomeSeekers.com,
Incorporated of our report dated July 22, 1999 and August 4, 1999 on the
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash
flows of HomeSeekers.com, Incorporated for the year ended June 30, 1999,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of HomeSeekers.com, Incorporated
for the year ended June 30, 2001.

________________________________
ALBRIGHT, PERSING & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Reno, Nevada
September 28, 2001
tricida-inducementplanx2






        TRICIDA, INC.  2020 INDUCEMENT PLAN    1. PURPOSE OF PLAN    The purpose of this Tricida, Inc. 2020 Inducement Plan (this “Plan”) of Tricida, Inc., a  Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is to advance the interests of the Company by providing  a material inducement for the best available individuals to join the Company and its Subsidiaries  as employees by affording such individuals an opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in the  Company.  2. ELIGIBILITY    The Plan will be reserved solely for awards to persons whom the Company may issue  shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company (“Common Stock”)  without stockholder approval pursuant to Rule 5635(c)(4) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules, or any  successor rule relating to inducement awards.  3. SHARE LIMITS; GRANT OF AWARDS    The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be delivered pursuant to  awards granted to Eligible Persons under this Plan is 5,000,000 shares (the “Share Limit”), such  limit subject to adjustment as contemplated by Section 5.7 of the 2018 Plan.  4. EFFECTIVE DATE    This Plan is effective as of December 10, 2020, the date of its approval by the Board  (the “Effective Date”). Unless earlier terminated by the Board, this Plan shall terminate at the  close of business on the day before the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date. After the  termination of this Plan either upon such stated expiration date or its earlier termination by the  Board, no additional awards may be granted under this Plan, but previously granted awards (and  the authority of the Committee with respect thereto, including the authority to amend such  awards) shall remain outstanding in accordance with their applicable terms and conditions and  the terms and conditions of this Plan.  5. OTHER TERMS    Except as expressly set forth herein, the terms of the Plan shall be identical to the terms  of the 2018 Plan, and such terms are incorporated by reference into this Plan (with such non-  substantive changes as are necessary to reflect their usage in this Plan instead of the 2018 Plan);  provided, however, that no Incentive Stock Options shall be awarded under this Plan. In the  event of any conflict between the provisions in this Plan and those of the 2018 Plan, the  provisions of this Plan shall govern.  6. DEFINED TERMS  





 






  6.1. “2018 Plan” means the Tricida, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, as may be amended  from time to time.    6.2. “Eligible Person” means persons expected to become officers and other employees of  the Company and its Subsidiaries as the Committee in its sole discretion may select from time to  time.    6.3 Defined terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the 2018 Plan.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Western Sierra Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Chaffee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 29, 2008

/s/ Michael M. ChaffeeMichael ChaffeeChief Executive Officer

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Clarent Energy Services, Inc. and Graham Gilliam v. Leasing 

Ventures, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-18-00036-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-50734

Trial court: 127th District Court of Harris County

Appellants are appealing from the trial court’s December 14, 2017 summary judgment 

order, as well as two other orders. The court ordered the parties to mediation, but appellee has 

filed an objection, claiming that the trial court has not yet signed a final judgment. 

The December 14, 2017 summary judgment order contains language indicating that it 

was not a final judgment. Appellants assert in their notice of appeal that the December 14 order, 

together with the denial of their motion for summary judgment, and a previous partial summary 

judgment comprise a final judgment, but finality is not evident from our review of the orders. If 

there is no final judgment, this court does not have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. See Jack 

B. Anglin Co. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (appeal may be had only from final 

judgments unless statute authorizes appeal of interlocutory order).

Accordingly the order of February 7, 2018, referring the parties to mediation, is 

withdrawn. 

The court may dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). 

Unless appellant causes a supplemental clerk’s record to be filed containing a final judgment, or 

it otherwise files a response demonstrating that this court has jurisdiction of the appeal, this 

appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). 

Appellant’s response, if any, is due in this court within 10 days of the date of this notice.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 21, 2018
Docket No: FAA-2015-8132 Dir ID: 2015-NM-127-AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti

Regional Airline Association

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman

Airlines for America Robert Ireland
#### PADRON v. CABRERA VULCAN SHOE CORPORATION.

No. 38834.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
#### SHIELDS *v.*WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 38,

September Term, 1962.]

*Decided December 13, 1962.*

Before Henderson, Hammond, Prescott, HornEy, Mar-bury and SybERT, JJ.

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in the memorandum filed by Judge Foster in the lower court, the application of Nathaniel Shields for leave to appeal from the order dismissing his second petition for post conviction relief from his imprisonment for assault and battery is hereby denied.

*Application denied.*
H. Res. 260

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

September 29, 1993.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order, any rule of the House to the contrary notwithstanding, to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R.

2493) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies

programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1994, and

for other purposes, with the Senate amendments to the

House amendments to the Senate amendments numbered 29

and 164 thereto, and to consider: (1) a motion that the

House concur in the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment numbered 29 with the

amendment printed in section 2 of this resolution; and (2) a

motion that the House concur in the Senate amendment to

the House amendment to the Senate amendment numbered

164 with the amendment printed in section 3 of this resolution. Each Senate amendment shall be considered as read.

Each motion shall be debatable for one hour, equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member
2

HRES 260 EH

of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on each motion to final adoption without intervening motion.

SEC. 2. The House amendment to the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment

numbered 29 is as follows: In the matter proposed to be

added by the Senate amendment, insert after the word ‘‘operations’’ the following: ‘‘, except for marketing year 1993’’.

SEC. 3. The House amendment to the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment

numbered 164 is as follows: In the matter proposed to be

added by the Senate amendment, insert before the period at

the end of section 731 the following: ‘‘, except in the case of

the Food and Drug Administration’’.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                Exhibit 23.2

    
                 CONSENT OF WILLIAM BUCK, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS     


    
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-94488, 33-94490, 33-94492 and 33-94494) pertaining to the
Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan, the 1994 Executive Stock Option
Plan, the 1995 Director Stock Option Plan and the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan of Open Environment Corporation of our reports dated September 3, 1996,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Jarrah Technologies Pty
Limited for the years ended December 31, 1993 and 1994 included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) of Open Environment Corporation and subsidiaries for the year
ended December 31, 1995 as amended in this Form 10-K/A.    


    
/s/ N T Hatzistergos
----------------------------------
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
October 10, 1996
State of Vermont Superior Court—Environmental Division

=================================================== =================== E N T R Y R E G A R D I N G M O T I O N

=================================================== =================== In re Conlon CU Permit D ocket No. 2-1-12 Vtec (Appeal of Planning Commission grant of conditional use approval for two-lot subdivision)

Title: Motion to Strike Questions 12, 15, 16 and 18

. Response filed on 10/26/12 by Appellants John and J ulia Baldwin X Granted (in part) X Denied (in part) ___ Other On September 14, 2012, this Court provided John and Julia Baldwin (“Appellants”) with additional time to file a revised Statement of Ques tions, given that the Court had previously dismissed Appellants’ Questions 7, 10, 11, and 19 a nd provided notice that the Court intended to also dismiss Appellants’ Questions 12, 15, 16 an d 18, if Appellants “fail[ed] to reframe these four Questions or fail to raise cognizable issues i n their reframed Question(s).” In re Conlon CU Permit, No. 2-1-12 Vtec, slip op. at 3 (Vt. Super C t., Envtl. Div. Aug. 30, 2012). In response, Appellants did not file a revised Stat ement of Questions, but rather on October 26, 2012 filed a document that contains the following sub-titles: Questions 12 & 18 Revised and Merged and Questions 15 & 16 Revised and Merged

. Appellants’ revised and merged Questions 12 and 18 appear to challenge the proposed Staniscia/Conlon subdivision and structure’s confor mance with certain provisions in the Town of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance. While the language A ppellants chose to use in their revised and merged Questions 12 and 18 is somewhat confusin g, it provides sufficient notice of the basis for Appellants’ legal challenge. We therefor e order that Appellants’ original Questions 12 and 18 are hereby STRICKEN and replaced with the revised and merged language Appellants offered for those Questions. Appellants revised and merged Questions 15 and 16 d o not provide any reference to a zoning ordinance provision that is within this Cour t’s jurisdiction to entertain in this appeal. We therefore STRIKE Appellant’s Questions 15 and 16 and disregard thei r offered revised and merged language. The Court Manager shall now set this matter for a p re-trial conference. The parties should prepare to discuss at that conference what r emains for this matter to be ready for trial scheduling.

_________________________________________ February 5, 2013 Thomas S. Durkin, Judge Date

=================================================== ========================== Date copies sent: ____________ Clerk's Initials: _______ Copies sent to: Appellants John and Julia Baldwin, pro se Martin Nitka, Attorney for Applicants/Appellees Edward Conlon and Debra Staniscia Frederick M. Glover, Attorney for Town of Plymou th
#### Kenneth HARRIS, Appellant, v. SANTA ROSA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-329.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 20, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 9, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Kalman BASS, a/k/a Kal Bass, Appellant, v. SPAN EAST AIRLINES, INC., a corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-284.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 8, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 977 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 977

 To make permanent the authority to transfer revenues attributable to 
 the taxation of certain railroad retirement benefits to the Railroad 
                          Retirement Account.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 1993

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make permanent the authority to transfer revenues attributable to 
 the taxation of certain railroad retirement benefits to the Railroad 
                          Retirement Account.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN TRANSFERS TO RAILROAD RETIREMENT ACCOUNT.

    Subsection (c)(1)(A) of section 224 of the Railroad Retirement 
Solvency Act of 1983 (relating to section 72(r) revenue increase 
transferred to certain railroad accounts) is amended by striking ``with 
respect to benefits received before October 1, 1992''.

                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 15.1 Deloitte Accountants B.V.
Flight Forum 1
5657 DA Eindhoven
P.O. Box 782
5600 AT Eindhoven
The Netherlands Tel: +31 (40) 2345000
Fax: +31 (40) 2345407
www.deloitte.nl ASML Holding N.V.
De Run 6501
5504 DR Veldhoven Date
    
    FromJanuary 28, 2005
    
    J.G.C.M. Buné
 Consent of independent auditors We consent to the incorporation by reference, in the following Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-13332, No. 333-109154, 333-105600, 333-116337), of ASML Holding N.V. (the Company) and
in the related Prospectuses, of our report dated January 28, 2005 included in the Financial
Statements on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004. /s/ Deloitte Accountants B.V.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Occupational Safety and Health Administration

          - 29 CFR Part 1910

      ( print page 30539)    

### CFR Correction

In Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1910 to § 1910.999, revised as of July 1, 2017, on page 247, in § 1910.106, paragraph (d)(2)(iii) introductory text is revised to read as follows:

§ 1910.106 

* * * * *

(d) * * *

(1) * * *

(2) * * *

                        (iii)                         *Size.*                         Flammable liquid containers shall be in accordance with Table H-12, except that glass or plastic containers of no more than 1-gallon capacity may be used for a Category 1 or 2 flammable liquid if:                    

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2018-14144 Filed 6-28-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1301-00-D
No. 00-884.

#### Schneider et ux. *v.*Simonini et al.

Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.
#### George W. MILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-846.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 11, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.