alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harry E. ELLIS, Jr., et ux., Petitioners, v. Thelma WAKEFIELD, etc., Respondent.

No. 40986.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 30, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 247 So.2d 29.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 15

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and
Shareholders

Frischs Restaurants, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying interim consolidated balance sheet of Frischs Restaurants, Inc. (an Ohio Corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 14, 2010, and the related consolidated
statement of earnings for each of the twenty-eight week and twelve week periods ended December 14, 2010 and December 15, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of shareholders equity and cash flows for the twenty-eight week
periods ended December 14, 2010 and December 15, 2009. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of June 1, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report
dated July 30, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
|Cincinnati, Ohio      
|January 12, 2011
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906


of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Friedman Industries,
Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jack Friedman, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2003



| |                     
| | --------------------
| | By /s/ JACK FRIEDMAN
| |                     
| | Name: Jack Friedman 

| |        |                                                  
| | ------ | -------------------------------------------------
| | Title: | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with Aduddell Industries, Inc.'s (the “Company”) Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Josh Brock, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                     |                                                                                                                                                     |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  November 19, 2007 | By:  /s/ Josh Brock               

Josh BrockInterim Chief Financial Officer |
**EXHIBIT99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Friendly IceCream Corporation (“the Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30,2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Donald N. Smith, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|   | By:                                         | /s/ Donald N. Smith |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Donald N. Smith                       |
|   | Title:    Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Date:    November 4, 2002         |

 

----
#### Hershel GRANT, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA CONVOY, INC., and American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents.

No. 43943.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 5, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

ERVIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Pizza Hut of America, LLC V. Houston Community College System

Appellate case number: 01

- 17

- 00101

- CV

Trial court case number: 1043516

Tr ial court: Co Civil Ct at Law No 4 of Harris County

Date motion filed: January 17, 2018

Party filing motion: Appellant Pizza Hut of America, LLC

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judg e’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes and Caughey

Date: February 13, 2 018
From: Colleen McKaughan/R9/USEPA/US

To: EBakken@Tep.com

, JYockey@Tep.com

, Cc: Gregory Nudd/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Eugene Chen/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Geoffrey Glass/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Shaheerah Kelly/R9/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 11/06/2012 01:50 PM Subject: EPA Information for TEP Sundt

Erik and Jeff,

Here is the information that I promised

- a summary of information for the Sundt power plant, plus our contractor report. Our staff engineers are in the process of review ing this material now, so if you notice any errors in the documents, we would be interested in that information. We wanted to give you an opportunity to look at the materials, and then we would like to schedule a conference call with you at your convenienc e to go over any questions that you might have.

Regarding next steps, we have to propose action on the Arizona Regional Haze Plan by December 8, 2012. If we disapprove any portions of the plan we will have to propose federal measures. Our deadline to pro pose federal measures is March 8, 2013. If TEP would like to submit information to EPA for our consideration, we would like to receive that information no later than the first week of January, 2013.

I am going to Navajo tomorrow, but I'm back on Thursday . If you have questions in the meantime, Greg Nudd is the project lead. Greg can be reached at 415

- 947

- 4107. Thank you for your cooperation on these issues.

Colleen W. McKaughan Associate Director, Air Division USEPA, Region 9 (520) 498

- 0118



### (See atta ched file: EGU Costs_Ch3 (TEP Irvington

- Sundt only).xlsx)(See attached file: WA5

- 12 Task 7 Deliverable

- BART Analysis Report (Sundt4 ONLY)_final.docx)
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMPANY

(Section 302)

I, John T. English, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Florida Public Utilities Company (the registrant);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 14, 2006



By  /s/ John T. English

John T. English

Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KIM LEE MCMULLEN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 399 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of January, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Exhibit 15




Fleming Companies, Inc.
6301 Waterford Boulevard, Box 26647
Oklahoma City, OK  73126

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited
interim financial information of Fleming Companies, Inc. and
subsidiaries for the 12 and 28 weeks ended July 10, 1999 and July 11,
1998, as indicated in our report dated July 29, 1999; because we did not
perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in
your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the 12 and 28 weeks ended July
10, 1999, is incorporated by reference in the following:

     (i) Registration Statement No. 2-98602 (1985 Stock Option Plan)
         on Form S-8;

    (ii) Registration Statement No. 33-36586 (1990 Fleming Stock
         Option Plan) on Form S-8;

   (iii) Registration Statement No. 33-56241 (Dividend Reinvestment
         and Stock Purchase Plan) on Form S-3;

    (iv) Registration Statement No. 333-11317 (1996 Stock Incentive
         Plan) on Form S-8;

     (v) Registration Statement No. 333-35703 (Senior Subordinated
         Notes) on Form S-4;

    (vi) Registration Statement No. 333-28219 (Associate Stock
         Purchase Plan) on Form S-8;

   (vii) Registration Statement No. 333-80445 (1999 Stock Incentive
         Plan) on Form S-8; and

  (viii) Registration Statement No. 333-89375 (Consolidated Savings Plus
         and Stock Ownership Plan) on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule
436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of a
registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a
report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
February 9, 2000
Exhibit 99.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

                   In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Binding Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2002, (the "Report"), I, Dennis J. Martin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

By:
      /s/ Dennis J.  Martin                                 Dennis J. Martin
 
          Chairman, President and Chief
MLP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0199

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

LAVODRICK TERELLE HOGUES,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and

including September 25, 2023, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 25 2023

08/25/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0199
# Official Journal C 108/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 108 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 631 April 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 108

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 631 April 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 108/01 | Euro exchange rates — 31 March 2020 | 1 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2020/C 108/02 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 2 |
| 2020/C 108/03 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 3 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 108/01

Euro exchange rates — 31 March 2020

1

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2020/C 108/02

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2

2020/C 108/03

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 108/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9604 – NENT/Telenor/JV) (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| 2020/C 108/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9786 – RIL/BP/RBML JV) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 108/06 | Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 | 8 |
| 2020/C 108/07 | Publication of the amended product specification following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 | 18 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 108/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9604 – NENT/Telenor/JV) (
  1
  )

1

4

2020/C 108/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9786 – RIL/BP/RBML JV) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2020/C 108/06

Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33

8

2020/C 108/07

Publication of the amended product specification following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012

18

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Dorothy Anderson DeTHORNE, Plaintiff, v. Nancy Denneno BECK et al., Defendants.

No. 73-131.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 6, 1973.

George L. Clapham, Orlando, for plaintiff.

Gary L. Dirlam and Robert C. Cooper of Hoffman, Hendry, Parker, Smith & Anderson, Orlando, for defendants.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Rule 4.6, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., the following question has been certified to this Court:

> “Is a station wagon that is not used as public livery conveyance for passengers, but is used primarily in the business of the insured a ‘motor vehicle’ as defined by Section 627.732, Florida Statutes?”

Based upon our reading of F.S. Section 627.732(1), F.S.A., and giving the language of that statute its intended meaning, we conclude that a station wagon that is not used as public livery conveyance for passengers but is used primarily in the business of the insured, is a motor vehicle, as defined by Section 627.732, supra. Art *449Berman Concrete Co. v. Sey Construction Corp., Fla.App.1971, 247 So.2d 791; Johnson v. Presbyterian Homes of Synod of Fla., Inc., Fla. 1970, 239 So.2d 256. Any administrative rule promulgated in furtherance of said statute must be consistent with the provisions thereof. 1 Fla.Jur., Administrative Law, Sec. 92.

The certified question is answered in the affirmative.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ„ concur.
#### Charles FRIEND, Appellant, v. Irwin R. LIPPMAN et al., Appellees.

No. R-190.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 24, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 25, 1973.

Robert B. Kane, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin,-Atty. Gen., and Daniel S. Dearing, Asst. Atty. Gen., Benjamin H. Dickens, of Bryant, Dickens, Rumph, Fran-son & Miller, and J. Lewis Hall, Jr., of Hall, Hartwell & Hall, Tallahassee, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order dismissing with prejudice his amended complaint seeking damages arising out of his allegedly tortious dismissal from employment as Director of the Division of Rehabilitation and Liquidation of the Department of Insurance.

The trial court found that appellant’s employment was exempted from career service protective provisions pursuant to Section 110.051(2) (h), Florida Statutes, F. S.A., because the nature of his employment was policy making in character. We agree.

In addition to the barring impact stemming from Section 110.051(2) (h), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., the appellees correctly contend that it has long been established by federal law that government officials and employees are immune from tort liability arising out of the removal of federal employees and it matters not that such employee may have been removed by their superior, maliciously or as a result of a conspiracy. The immunity from suit is absolute where the law gives the public official the right to remove the employee. The cases and the doctrine behind the rule are well summarized in 5 A.L.R. Federal 965, et. seq.

Accordingly, the judgment reviewed herein is affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                     EXHIBIT 11.1

                           CALCULATION OF EARNING PER SHARE


     In the calculation of earning per share for the years ended December 31,
1997, 1996 and 1995, weighted shares outstanding have been computed as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                       ----------------------------------
                                                                          1997        1996        1995
                                                                       ---------  ----------    ---------
<S>                                                                    <C>        <C>           <C>
Weighted average shares  outstanding -

   Shares outstanding from beginning of period                         6,639,587   5,548,402    4,212,499

   Sale of 40,044, 34,062 and 19,007 shares of common stock
      through Employee Stock Purchase plans, respectively                 30,588      26,483           --

   Acquisition of LOR/GB with issuance of  578,651 shares on
      Common Stock on  February 13, 1996                                      --     509,086           --

   Issuance of 1,300,000 shares of Common Stock for initial
      public offering on March 20, 1995                                       --          --    1,015,068

   Weighted options outstanding (1)                                           --          --      621,175

   Stock Options exercised during the period                              73,824     144,003      213,544
                                                                       ---------  ----------    ---------
   Weighted Average Common and Common equivalent shares
      outstanding                                                      6,743,999   6,527,974    6,062,288
</TABLE>

(1)  Excludes anti-dilutive common share equivalents in the weighted average
     shares outstanding calculation for 1997 and 1996.