Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 24, 2011 / Notices 52945 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Purpose of the Board: The purpose of 

the Board is to make recommendations 

to DOE–EM and site management in the 

areas of environmental restoration, 

waste management, and related 

activities. 

Tentative Agenda: The main meeting 

presentation will be an overview of 

URS/CH2M Oak Ridge LLC (UCOR), the 

new prime cleanup contractor for the 

DOE–Oak Ridge Office, and their project 

plans. 

Public Participation: The EM SSAB, 

Oak Ridge, welcomes the attendance of 

the public at its advisory committee 

meetings and will make every effort to 

accommodate persons with physical 

disabilities or special needs. If you 

require special accommodations due to 

a disability, please contact Patricia J. 

Halsey at least seven days in advance of 

the meeting at the phone number listed 

above. Written statements may be filed 

with the Board either before or after the 

meeting. Individuals who wish to make 

oral statements pertaining to the agenda 

item should contact Patricia J. Halsey at 

the address or telephone number listed 

above. Requests must be received five 

days prior to the meeting and reasonable 

provision will be made to include the 

presentation in the agenda. The Deputy 

Designated Federal Officer is 

empowered to conduct the meeting in a 

fashion that will facilitate the orderly 

conduct of business. Individuals 

wishing to make public comments will 

be provided a maximum of five minutes 

to present their comments. 

Minutes: Minutes will be available by 

writing or calling Patricia J. Halsey at 

the address and phone number listed 

above. Minutes will also be available at 

the following Web site: http:// 

www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab/ 

minutes.htm. 

Issued at Washington, DC, on August 17, 

2011. 

LaTanya R. Butler, 

Acting Deputy Committee Management 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–21637 Filed 8–23–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

[OE Docket No. PP–230–4] 

Notice of Supplemental Filing; 

International Transmission Company, 

d/b/a ITC Transmission. 

AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery 

and Energy Reliability, DOE. 

ACTION: Notice of Supplemental Filing. 

SUMMARY: International Transmission 

Company, d/b/a ITCTransmission (ITC), 

filed supplemental documents in an 

ongoing Presidential permit proceeding 

regarding the ITC application to amend 

Presidential Permit No. PP–230–3. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted 

and received by DOE on or before 

September 23, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Comments should be 

addressed to: Christopher Lawrence, 

Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy 

Reliability, Mail Code: OE–20, U.S. 

Department of Energy, 1000 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20585–0350. Because 

of delays in handling conventional mail, 

it is recommended that documents be 

transmitted by overnight mail, by 

electronic mail to 

Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov, or by 

facsimile to 202–586–8008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Lawrence (Program Office) 

at 202–586–5260, or by e-mail to 

Christopher.Lawrence@hq.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

January 5, 2009, ITC applied to the DOE 

to amend Presidential Permit No. PP– 

230–3 by authorizing ITC to replace a 

failed 675–MVA transformer with two 

700–MVA phase-shifting transformers 

connected in series at ITC’s Bunce Creek 

Station in Marysville, Michigan. 

DOE issued a notice of ITC’s 

application in the Federal Register on 

February 10, 2009 (74 FR 6607), 

requesting that any comments, protests, 

or motions to intervention be filed by 

March 12, 2009. Numerous responsive 

documents were filed, including late 

requests to intervene. The filings raised 

various issues, including the need to 

review the operational protocols for the 

facilities with the installation of the new 

transformers, also known as phase angle 

regulators (PARs). 

On August 9, 2011, DOE received 

Supplemental Reply Comments from 

ITC, which completed the ITC response 

to earlier comments filed in the 

proceeding by the Midwest Independent 

Transmission System Operator (MISO), 

Inc. and the Independent Electricity 

System Operator of Ontario. According 

to ITC, the supplemental filing provided 

the operational agreements required to 

complete ITC’s application in the 

amendment proceeding, including a 

letter of agreement between ITC and 

MISO assigning functional control of the 

subject facilities at the Bunce Creek 

Station to MISO. 

ITC requested that DOE accept this 

filing as sufficient to allow DOE to 

approve its application to amend the 

ITC Presidential permit on an expedited 

basis without further notice so that the 

transformers can be placed into service 

and benefits from controlling the Lake 

Erie loop flow can be begin. ITC has also 

indicated that placing the PARs into 

service now will also allow the parties 

to better assess the various impacts of 

PARs operations and thus, better 

determine if the current operational 

procedures would need to be modified. 

However, DOE is interested in 

receiving comments from prior 

participants in this proceeding and 

other interested persons on this most 

recent filing by ITC before deciding on 

how to proceed on ITC’s amendment 

application. In particular, DOE is 

interested in obtaining the views of 

other affected utilities and system 

operators on the sufficiency of the 

operating principles provided by ITC. 

Procedural Matters: Any person 

desiring to be heard in response to this 

notice should file written comments 

with DOE. Fifteen copies of such 

comments should be sent to the address 

provided above on or before the date 

listed above. 

Additional copies of such petitions to 

intervene or protests also should be 

filed directly with: Stephen J. Videto, 

ITCTransmission, 27175 Energy Way, 

Novi, MI 48377 and AND John R. 

Staffier, Stuntz, Davis & Staffier, P.C., 

555 Twelfth Street, NW., Suite 630, 

Washington, DC. 

Copies of the supplemental filing will 

be made available, upon request, for 

public inspection and copying at the 

address provided above or it may be 

reviewed or downloaded electronically 

at http://energy.gov/node/292291. All of 

the documents filed in the OE Docket 

No. PP–230–4 proceeding may be 

viewed by going to the pending permits 

page at http://energy.gov/node/11845 

and scrolling to the Docket No. PP–230– 

4 section. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on August 18, 

2011. 

Brian Mills, 

Director, Permitting and Siting, Office of 

Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability. 

[FR Doc. 2011–21635 Filed 8–23–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0850; FRL–8886–6] 

Chlorpyrifos Registration Review; 

Preliminary Human Health Risk 

Assessment; Extension of Comment 

Period 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice; Extension of comment 

period. 


wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
52946 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 24, 2011 / Notices 

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the 

Federal Register of Wednesday, July 6, 

2011, concerning the availability of the 

chlorpyrifos registration review; 

preliminary human health risk 

assessment. This document extends the 

comment period for 30 days, from 

Tuesday, September 6, 2011 to 

Thursday, October 6, 2011. 

DATES: Comments, identified by docket 

identification (ID) number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2008–0850, must be received on or 

before Thursday, October 6, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed 

instructions as provided under 

ADDRESSES in the Federal Register 

document of Wednesday, July 6, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom 

Myers, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 

(703) 308–8589; e-mail address: 

myers.tom@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

document extends the public comment 

period for the chlorpyrifos reregistration 

review, preliminary human health risk 

assessment, established in the Federal 

Register of Wednesday, July 6, 2011 (76 

FR 39399) (FRL–8878–9). The document 

announced the availability of the human 

health assessment, along with all 

supporting documents, and commenced 

a 60-day public comment period that 

would end on September 6, 2011. 

This preliminary assessment 

incorporates new information that was 

not available at the time of the last 

assessment in 2000. Since 2000, several 

Scientific Advisory Panels have been 

held specifically on chlorpyrifos and 

some of the Agency’s science policies 

and methods have changed. Based on 

the extant data and assumptions made 

in the preliminary assessment, risks 

have been preliminarily identified for 

drinking water, handlers, and 

residential bystanders. A Reader’s Guide 

accompanied the preliminary human 

health assessment that detailed some of 

these exposure assumptions and 

remaining evaluations needed on the 

hazard assessment. 

As of early August, eight comments 

have been submitted to the EPA docket 

requesting a 60-day extension of the 

comment period based on the complex 

scientific issues and precedent setting 

policy applications. The submitters are 

Dow AgroSciences, Gharda Chemicals 

Limited, Agricultural Retailers 

Association, California Citrus Mutual, 

California Grape and Tree Fruit League, 

Oregonians for Food and Shelter, 

CropLife America and the Washington 

Friends of Farms and Forests. 

In recognition of the complex, robust 

scientific database and mechanistic 

studies available for chlorpyrifos, the 

Agency will extend the public comment 

period by 30 days to end on October 6, 

2011. Subsequent to this public 

comment period, the Agency will be 

revising the human health assessment 

based on a full weight of the evidence 

evaluation of all available data, and 

consideration of all comments received 

during the comment period as well as 

any additional information received on 

the health and exposure analyses. EPA 

is hereby extending the comment 

period, which was set to end on 

Tuesday, September 6, 2011, to 

Thursday, October 6, 2011. 

To submit comments, or access the 

docket, please follow the detailed 

instructions as provided under 

ADDRESSES in the Wednesday, July 6, 

2011 Federal Register document. If you 

have questions, consult the person 

listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, 

chlorpyrifos, pesticides, and pests. 

Dated: August 18, 2011. 

Peter Caulkins, 

Acting Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation 

Division, Office of Pesticides Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2011–21677 Filed 8–23–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9455–9] 

Clean Air Act Operating Permit 

Program; Petition for Objection to 

State Operating Permit for Williams 

Four Corners, LLC, Sims Mesa CDP 

Compressor Station 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of final action. 

SUMMARY: This document announces 

that the EPA Administrator has 

responded to a citizen petition asking 

EPA to object to an operating permit 

(Permit Number P026R2) issued by the 

New Mexico Environment Department, 

Air Quality Bureau (NMED). 

Specifically, the Administrator has 

granted the April 14, 2010 petition, 

submitted by WildEarth Guardians and 

San Juan Citizens Alliance (Petitioners) 

to object to the March 19, 2010, 

operating permit issued to Williams 

Four Corners, LLC, for the Sims Mesa 

Central Delivery Point (CDP) 

compressor station in northwestern Rio 

Arriba County, New Mexico. Pursuant 

to sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the 

Clean Air Act (CAA), a petition for 

judicial review of those parts of the 

Order that deny issues in the petition 

may be filed in the United States Court 

of Appeals for the appropriate circuit 

within 60 days from the date this notice 

appears in the Federal Register. 

ADDRESSES: You may review copies of 

the final Order, the petition, and other 

supporting information at EPA Region 6, 

1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202– 

2733. EPA requests that if at all 

possible, you contact the individual 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section to view copies of the 

final Order, petition, and other 

supporting information. You may view 

the hard copies Monday through Friday, 

from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., excluding Federal 

holidays. If you wish to examine these 

documents, you should make an 

appointment at least 24 hours before the 

visiting day. Additionally, the final 

Order for the Williams Four Corners, 

LLC, Sims Mesa CDP Compressor 

Station is available electronically at: 

http://www.epa.gov/region07/air/title5/ 

petitiondb/petitions/ 

simsmesa_response2010.pdf 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jeffrey Robinson at (214) 665–7250, email address: robinson.jeffrey@epa.gov 

or the above EPA, Region 6 address. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA 

affords EPA a 45-day period to review, 

and object to as appropriate, a Title V 

operating permit proposed by State 

permitting authorities. Section 505(b)(2) 

of the Act authorizes any person to 

petition the EPA Administrator, within 

60 days after the expiration of this 

review period, to object to a Title V 

operating permit if EPA has not done so. 

Petitions must be based only on 

objections to the permit that were raised 

with reasonable specificity during the 

public comment period provided by the 

State, unless the petitioner demonstrates 

that it was impracticable to raise these 

issues during the comment period or the 

grounds for the issue arose after this 

period. 

EPA received a petition from the 

Petitioners dated April 14, 2010, 

requesting that EPA object to the 

issuance of the Title V operating permit 

to Williams Four Corners, LLC., for the 

operation of the Sims Mesa CDP 

Compressor Station in northwestern Rio 

Arriba County, New Mexico for the 

following reasons: (1) The Title V 

permit fails to ensure compliance with 

the Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration and Title V requirements; 

(2) the Title V permit fails to ensure 

prompt reporting of deviations; (3) the 


wreier-aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES