# Official Journal C 414/30 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 414 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6330 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 414

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6330 November 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2020/C 414/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2020/C 414/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2020/C 414/02 | Case C-66/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020 — European Commission v Hungary (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Admissibility — Jurisdiction of the Court — General Agreement on Trade in Services — Article XVI — Market access — Schedule of specific commitments — Requirement of authorisation — Article XX(2) — Article XVII — National treatment — Service provider having its seat in a third country — National legislation of a Member State imposing conditions for the supply of higher education services within its territory — Requirement relating to the conclusion of an international treaty with the State in which the provider has its seat — Requirement relating to the provision of education in the State in which the provider has its seat — Modification of conditions of competition to the benefit of national providers — Justification — Public order — Prevention of deceptive practices — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Directive 2006/123/EC — Services in the internal market — Article 16 — Article 56 TFEU — Freedom to provide services — Existence of a restriction — Justification — Overriding reason in the public interest — Public order — Prevention of deceptive practices — High quality of the education — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 13 — Academic freedom — Article 14(3) — Freedom to found educational establishments — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Article 52(1)) | 2 |
| 2020/C 414/03 | Case C-134/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020 — Bank Refah Kargaran v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Article 29 TEU — Article 215 TFEU — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran to prevent nuclear proliferation — Harm allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of its name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities covered by the freezing of financial funds and resources — Action for damages — Jurisdiction of the Court to hear and determine an action for damages for the harm allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Inadequate statement of reasons for legal acts imposing restrictive measures) | 3 |
| 2020/C 414/04 | Case C-181/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen — Germany) — Jobcenter Krefeld — Widerspruchsstelle v JD (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of persons — Workers — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Article 10 — Children attending school — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 24 — Social assistance — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 4 — Article 70 — Special non-contributory cash benefits — Migrant worker with dependent children attending school in the host Member State) | 4 |
| 2020/C 414/05 | Case C-235/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — United Kingdom) — United Biscuits (Pension Trustees) Limited, United Biscuits Pension Investments Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 135(1)(a) — Exemption of insurance transactions — Supply of pension fund management services to trustees by investment fund managers — Exclusion of any risk indemnity — Occupational pension scheme — National tax practice — Exercise of an insurance activity — Authorised entities — Entities not holding such authorisation — Concept of ‘insurance transactions’) | 5 |
| 2020/C 414/06 | Joined Cases C-245/19 and C-246/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative — Luxembourg) — État luxembourgeois v B (C-245/19), and État luxembourgeois v B, C, D and F.C. (C-246/19) (References for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2011/16/EU — Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation — Articles 1 and 5 — Decision ordering that information be provided to the competent authority of a Member State, acting in response to a request for exchange of information from the competent authority of another Member State — Person holding the information the protection of which is ordered by the competent authority of the first Member State — Taxpayer concerned by the investigation giving rise to the request from the competent authority of the second Member State — Third parties with whom that taxpayer maintains legal, banking, financial or, more broadly, economic relations — Judicial protection — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Article 52(1) — Limitation — Legal basis — Respect for the essence of the right to an effective remedy — Existence of a remedy enabling the individuals in question to obtain an effective review of all the relevant issues of fact and of law, as well as effective judicial protection of the rights guaranteed to them by EU law — Objective of general interest recognised by the Union — Combating international tax fraud and tax evasion — Proportionality — Whether the information referred to in the information order is ‘foreseeably relevant’ — Judicial review — Scope — Personal, temporal and material factors to be taken into consideration) | 6 |
| 2020/C 414/07 | Case C-330/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Exter BV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Community Customs Code — Article 121(1) — Inward processing procedure — Release for free circulation — Incurrence of a customs debt — Determination of the debt — Concept of ‘taxation elements’ — Taking account of a preferential tariff measure) | 7 |
| 2020/C 414/08 | Case C-360/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — Crown Van Gelder BV v Autoriteit Consument en Markt (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market for electricity — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 37 — Duties and powers of the regulatory authority — Out-of-court dispute settlement — Concept of ‘party having a complaint’ — Complaint submitted by a final customer against the operator of a transmission system to which that customer’s installation is not directly connected — Failure on the grid — No contractual relationship between that customer and the operator of that grid — Admissibility of the complaint) | 8 |
| 2020/C 414/09 | Case C-443/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco — Spain) — Vodafone España SAU v Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/20/EC — Article 13 — Fee for rights of use for radio frequencies — Sectoral national legislation subjecting the allocation of public radio frequencies to a charge — National legislation subjecting the grant of administrative concessions on public assets to a tax on the transfer of assets) | 8 |
| 2020/C 414/10 | Case C-456/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen — Sweden) — Aktiebolaget Östgötatrafiken v Patent- och registreringsverket (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 3(1)(b) — Signs of which a trade mark may consist — Distinctive character — Application for registration as a trade mark of a sign in respect of a service, consisting of motifs of colour and intended to be affixed to goods used to provide that service — Assessment of the distinctive character of that sign — Criteria) | 9 |
| 2020/C 414/11 | Case C-476/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Göteborg — Sweden) — Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket v Combinova AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Union Customs Code — Article 124(1)(k) — Extinction of the customs debt in the event the goods are not used — Concept of ‘goods that have been used’ — Inward processing procedure — Customs debt incurred through non-compliance with requirements provided for under the inward processing procedure — Bill of discharge not submitted within the prescribed time limit) | 10 |
| 2020/C 414/12 | Case C-514/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Union des industries de la protection des plantes v Premier Ministre, Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire, Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé, Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation, Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environnement et du travail (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Placing of plant protection products on the market — Emergency measures — Officially informing the European Commission — Directive (EU) 2015/1535 — Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations — Neonicotinoids — Protection of bees — Principle of sincere cooperation) | 10 |
| 2020/C 414/13 | Case C-558/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj — Romania) — Impresa Pizzarotti & C SPA Italia Sucursala Cluj v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 49 and 63 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Free movement of capital — Calculation of the taxable income of companies — Persons having a relationship of interdependence — Unusual advantage granted by a resident branch to a non-resident company — Correction of the taxable income of the branch of a non-resident company — No correction of taxable income in the event of an identical advantage granted by a branch to a resident company — Principle of free competition — Restriction on freedom of establishment — Justification — Balanced allocation of the power to tax between Member States — Proportionality) | 11 |
| 2020/C 414/14 | Case C-568/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha — Spain) — MO v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Toledo (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/EC — Common standards and procedures for returning illegally staying third-country nationals — Article 6(1) and Article 8(1) — Illegal stay — National legislation providing for either a fine or removal, depending on the circumstances — Consequences of the judgment of 23 April 2015, Zaizoune (C-38/14, EU:C:2015:260) — National legislation more favourable to the interested party — Direct effect of directives — Limits) | 12 |
| 2020/C 414/15 | Case C-602/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln — Germany) — kohlpharma GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 34 and 36 TFEU — Free movement of goods — Quantitative restrictions — Measures having equivalent effect — Refusal to approve an amendment to the particulars and documents relating to a medicinal product which is the subject of a parallel import licence — Protection of the health and life of humans — Directive 2001/83/EC) | 13 |
| 2020/C 414/16 | Case C-641/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — EU v PE Digital GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Point 11 of Article 2, Article 14(3) and Article 16(m) — Distance contract — Supply of digital content and digital services — Right of withdrawal — Obligations of the consumer in the event of withdrawal — Determination of the amount to be paid by the consumer for the services provided before the exercise of the right of withdrawal — Exception to the right of withdrawal in the case of the supply of digital content) | 13 |
| 2020/C 414/17 | Case C-644/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia — Romania) — FT v Universitatea ‘Lucian Blaga’ Sibiu, GS and Others, HS, Ministerul Educaţiei Naţionale (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2000/78/EC — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Articles 1, 2 and 3 — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Measure taken by a university pursuant to national law — Retention of tenured lecturer status beyond the statutory retirement age — Possibility restricted to lecturers with doctoral supervisor status — Lecturers who do not have this status — Fixed-term employment contracts — Lower remuneration than for tenured lecturers) | 14 |
| 2020/C 414/18 | Case C-657/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt D v E (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Exemptions — Article 132(1)(g) — Supply of services closely linked to welfare and social security work — Preparation of expert reports on the level of care and support needs — Taxable person appointed by the medical service of a care and support insurance fund — Bodies recognised as being devoted to social wellbeing) | 15 |
| 2020/C 414/19 | Case C-711/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Admiral Sportwetten GmbH, Novomatic AG, AKO Gastronomiebetriebs GmbH v Magistrat der Stadt Wien (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive (EU) 2015/1535 — Article 1 — Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services — Definition of ‘technical regulation’ — Games of chance — Local duty on the operation of betting terminals — Tax rule — European Commission not notified — Enforceability against the taxpayer) | 16 |
| 2020/C 414/20 | Case C-320/18 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 — Crocs Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Gifi Diffusion (Appeal — Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Declaration of invalidity — Appeal which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate — Costs) | 16 |
| 2020/C 414/21 | Case C-610/19: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Vikingo Fővállalkozó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 168, 178, 220 and 226 — Principles of fiscal neutrality, of effectiveness and of proportionality — Right to deduct VAT — Refusal — Conditions for the existence of a supply of goods — Evasion — Proof — Penalty — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective judicial remedy) | 17 |
| 2020/C 414/22 | Case C-611/19: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Crewprint Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Principles of fiscal neutrality, of effectiveness and of proportionality — Right to VAT deduction — Refusal — Fraud — Proof — Chain of subcontractors) | 18 |
| 2020/C 414/23 | Case C-837/19: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — Super Bock Bebidas SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 17(6) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 168 and 176 — Exclusion from the right to deduct — Purchase of accommodation, food, drink, vehicle leases, fuel and tolls services — Standstill clause — Accession to the European Union) | 18 |
| 2020/C 414/24 | Case C-98/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 8 — Czech Republic) — mBank S.A. v PA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Jurisdiction in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State in which the consumer is domiciled — Article 18(2) — Proceedings brought against the consumer by the seller or supplier — Concept of ‘consumer’s domicile’ — Relevant time for determining the consumer’s domicile — Transfer of the consumer’s domicile after the conclusion of the contract and before the action is brought) | 19 |
| 2020/C 414/25 | Case C-135/20: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — JS v Câmara Municipal de Gondomar (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 5 — Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector — Successive contracts — Prohibition on converting fixed-term contracts to open-ended contracts — Whether permissible) | 20 |
| 2020/C 414/26 | Case C-137/20: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores — Portugal) — MV v SATA International — Serviços e Transportes Aéreos SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Scope — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory framework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility) | 20 |
| 2020/C 414/27 | Case C-690/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha (Spain) lodged on 19 September 2019 — XC v Subdelegación del Gobierno de Toledo | 21 |
| 2020/C 414/28 | Case C-284/20 P: Appeal brought on 29 June 2020 by Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 29 April 2020 in Case T-73/19, Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag v EUIPO — Scheppach Fabrikation von Holzbearbeitungsmaschinen (Wood-splitting tool) | 21 |
| 2020/C 414/29 | Case C-313/20 P: Appeal brought on 10 July 2020 by Abarca — Companhia de Seguros SA against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 29 April 2020 in Case T-106/19, Abarca v EUIPO — Abanca Corporación Bancaria (ABARCA SEGUROS) | 21 |
| 2020/C 414/30 | Case C-417/20: Request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) of 3 September 2020 — Viasat UK Ltd, Viasat Inc. v Institut belge des services postaux et des télécommunications (IBPT), État belge, Inmarsat Ventures SE | 22 |
| 2020/C 414/31 | Case C-419/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 8 September 2020 — F. Reyher Nchfg. GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg | 22 |
| 2020/C 414/32 | Case C-427/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 10 September 2020 — Flexi Montagetechnik GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Kiel | 23 |
| 2020/C 414/33 | Case C-433/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 15 September 2020 — Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft mbH v Strato AG | 23 |
| 2020/C 414/34 | Case C-461/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 24 September 2020 — Advania Sverige AB, Kammarkollegiet v Dustin Sverige AB | 24 |
| 2020/C 414/35 | Case C-486/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 1 October 2020 — Varuh človekovih pravic Republike Slovenije | 24 |
| 2020/C 414/36 | Case C-354/19: Order of the President of the Court of 25 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea Hovrätt — Sweden) — Novartis AG v Patent-och registreringsverket | 25 |
| 2020/C 414/37 | Case C-663/19: Order of the President of the Court of 24 August 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Gera — Germany) — MM v Volkswagen AG | 25 |
| 2020/C 414/38 | Case C-810/19: Order of the President of the Court of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — Flightright GmbH v Qatar Airways | 25 |
| 2020/C 414/39 | Case C-827/19: Order of the President of the Grand Chamber of the Court of 4 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Pontevedra — Spain) — D.A.T.A., L.F.A., A.M.A.G., L.F.A., J.G.C., S.C.C., A.C.V., A.A.G., A.C.A., L.C.A., N.P.B., P.C.A. v Ryanair D.A.C. | 26 |
| 2020/C 414/40 | Case C-904/19: Order of the President of the Court of 28 August 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie — Poland) — E. Sp. z o.o v K.S. | 26 |
| 2020/C 414/41 | Case C-943/19: Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — SIA ‘ONDO’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs | 26 |
| 2020/C 414/42 | Case C-944/19: Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — AS ‘4finance’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs | 26 |
| 2020/C 414/43 | Case C-945/19: Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — SIA ‘OC Finance’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs | 27 |
| 2020/C 414/44 | Case C-946/19: Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 25 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) — United Kingdom) — MG v HH | 27 |
| 2020/C 414/45 | Case C-252/20: Order of the President of the Court of 13 August 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — CY v Eurowings GmbH | 27 |
| | General Court |
| 2020/C 414/46 | Joined Cases T-515/13 RENV and T-719/13 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Spain and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIG) and their investors — Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) — Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part — Selective nature — Obligation to state reasons — Recovery of the aid — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty) | 28 |
| 2020/C 414/47 | Case T-381/15 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — IMG v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Development cooperation — Implementation of the EU budget under indirect management — Decision suspending the applicant’s ability to conclude new delegation agreements for indirect management with the Commission — Unlawfulness — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Application for injunctive relief — Late submission of application — Modification of the nature of the reparation sought — Inadmissibility) | 29 |
| 2020/C 414/48 | Joined Cases T-401/16 and T-443/16: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Spain and Italy v Commission (Language regime — Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of Investigators and Team leaders — Language skills — Limitation of the choice of second language in the competitions to German, English and French — Eliminatory language-comprehension test in English — Language of communication — Regulation No 1 — Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations — Discrimination based on language — Justification — Interests of the service — Proportionality) | 29 |
| 2020/C 414/49 | Case T-249/17: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — Casino, Guichard-Perrachon and AMC v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Administrative procedure — Decision ordering an inspection — Plea of illegality against Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Right to an effective remedy — Equality of arms — Obligation to state reasons — Right to inviolability of the home — Sufficiently strong evidence — Proportionality) | 30 |
| 2020/C 414/50 | Case T-254/17: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — Intermarché Casino Achats v Commission (Competition — Cartels — Administrative procedure — Decision ordering an inspection — Plea of illegality of Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Right to an effective remedy — Equality of arms — Obligation to state reasons — Right to inviolability of the home — Reasonable grounds — Evidence of participation in the suspected infringements — Proportionality) | 31 |
| 2020/C 414/51 | Case T-255/17: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Administrative procedure — Decisions ordering an inspection — Plea of illegality against Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Right to an effective remedy — Obligation to state reasons — Right to inviolability of the home — Sufficiently strong evidence — Proportionality — Action for annulment — Complaints relating to manner of conduction the inspection — Refusal to protect the confidentiality of data relating to private life — Inadmissibility) | 32 |
| 2020/C 414/52 | Case T-380/17: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — HeidelbergCement and Schwenk Zement v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Market for grey cement in Croatia — Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement — Undertakings concerned — Relevant market — Substantial part of the internal market — Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition — Commitments — Rights of the defence — Partial referral to the national authorities) | 33 |
| 2020/C 414/53 | Cases T-77/18 and T-567/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — VE v ESMA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Appraisal report — 2016 appraisal exercise — Plea of illegality relating to the appraisals guide — Manifest error of assessment — Assessment of activities undertaken as staff representative — Procedural irregularity — Termination of the work contract — Insufficient performance during a period of two years) | 33 |
| 2020/C 414/54 | Case T-18/19: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — Brown v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Official with United Kingdom nationality at the date of entering the service — Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union — Acquisition of the nationality of the country of employment during the course of a career — Loss of the expatriation allowance — Equal treatment — Principle of non-discrimination — Article 4(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations) | 34 |
| 2020/C 414/55 | Case T-264/19: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — nanoPET Pharma v EUIPO — Miltenyi Biotec (viscover) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark viscover — Absence of bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001) — Article 53(2)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(2)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001)) | 35 |
| 2020/C 414/56 | Case T-289/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Arbuzov v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State respected the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection) | 35 |
| 2020/C 414/57 | Case T-475/20: Action brought on 9 August 2020 — LE v Commission | 36 |
| 2020/C 414/58 | Case T-579/20: Action brought on 21 September 2020 — Genekam Biotechnology v Commission | 37 |
| 2020/C 414/59 | Case T-580/20: Action brought on 7 October 2020 — KC v Commission | 38 |
| 2020/C 414/60 | Case T-582/20: Action brought on 17 September 2020 — Ighoga Region 10 and Others v Commission | 39 |
| 2020/C 414/61 | Case T-588/20: Action brought on 25 September 2020 — MP v Commission | 40 |
| 2020/C 414/62 | Case T-602/20: Action brought on 30 September 2020 — MS v Commission | 41 |
| 2020/C 414/63 | Case T-606/20: Action brought on 30 September 2020 — Austrian Power Grid and Others v ACER | 41 |
| 2020/C 414/64 | Case T-607/20: Action brought on 30 September 2020 — Austrian Power Grid and Others v ACER | 42 |
| 2020/C 414/65 | Case T-611/20: Action brought on 2 October 2020 — Airoldi Metalli v Commission | 43 |
| 2020/C 414/66 | Case T-617/20: Action brought on 5 October 2020 — Standardkessel Baumgarte Holding v EUIPO (Standardkessel) | 44 |
| 2020/C 414/67 | Case T-623/20: Action brought on 9 October 2020 — Sun West and Others v Commission | 45 |
| 2020/C 414/68 | Case T-626/20: Action brought on 12 October 2020 — Landwärme v Commission | 46 |
| 2020/C 414/69 | Case T-628/20: Action brought on 16 October 2020 — Ryanair v Commission | 47 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2020/C 414/02

Case C-66/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020 — European Commission v Hungary (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Admissibility — Jurisdiction of the Court — General Agreement on Trade in Services — Article XVI — Market access — Schedule of specific commitments — Requirement of authorisation — Article XX(2) — Article XVII — National treatment — Service provider having its seat in a third country — National legislation of a Member State imposing conditions for the supply of higher education services within its territory — Requirement relating to the conclusion of an international treaty with the State in which the provider has its seat — Requirement relating to the provision of education in the State in which the provider has its seat — Modification of conditions of competition to the benefit of national providers — Justification — Public order — Prevention of deceptive practices — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Directive 2006/123/EC — Services in the internal market — Article 16 — Article 56 TFEU — Freedom to provide services — Existence of a restriction — Justification — Overriding reason in the public interest — Public order — Prevention of deceptive practices — High quality of the education — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 13 — Academic freedom — Article 14(3) — Freedom to found educational establishments — Article 16 — Freedom to conduct a business — Article 52(1))

2

2020/C 414/03

Case C-134/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020 — Bank Refah Kargaran v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Article 29 TEU — Article 215 TFEU — Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran to prevent nuclear proliferation — Harm allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of its name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities covered by the freezing of financial funds and resources — Action for damages — Jurisdiction of the Court to hear and determine an action for damages for the harm allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Inadequate statement of reasons for legal acts imposing restrictive measures)

3

2020/C 414/04

Case C-181/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen — Germany) — Jobcenter Krefeld — Widerspruchsstelle v JD (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of persons — Workers — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Article 10 — Children attending school — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 24 — Social assistance — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 4 — Article 70 — Special non-contributory cash benefits — Migrant worker with dependent children attending school in the host Member State)

4

2020/C 414/05

Case C-235/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — United Kingdom) — United Biscuits (Pension Trustees) Limited, United Biscuits Pension Investments Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 135(1)(a) — Exemption of insurance transactions — Supply of pension fund management services to trustees by investment fund managers — Exclusion of any risk indemnity — Occupational pension scheme — National tax practice — Exercise of an insurance activity — Authorised entities — Entities not holding such authorisation — Concept of ‘insurance transactions’)

5

2020/C 414/06

Joined Cases C-245/19 and C-246/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative — Luxembourg) — État luxembourgeois v B (C-245/19), and État luxembourgeois v B, C, D and F.C. (C-246/19) (References for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2011/16/EU — Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation — Articles 1 and 5 — Decision ordering that information be provided to the competent authority of a Member State, acting in response to a request for exchange of information from the competent authority of another Member State — Person holding the information the protection of which is ordered by the competent authority of the first Member State — Taxpayer concerned by the investigation giving rise to the request from the competent authority of the second Member State — Third parties with whom that taxpayer maintains legal, banking, financial or, more broadly, economic relations — Judicial protection — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Article 52(1) — Limitation — Legal basis — Respect for the essence of the right to an effective remedy — Existence of a remedy enabling the individuals in question to obtain an effective review of all the relevant issues of fact and of law, as well as effective judicial protection of the rights guaranteed to them by EU law — Objective of general interest recognised by the Union — Combating international tax fraud and tax evasion — Proportionality — Whether the information referred to in the information order is ‘foreseeably relevant’ — Judicial review — Scope — Personal, temporal and material factors to be taken into consideration)

6

2020/C 414/07

Case C-330/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Exter BV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Community Customs Code — Article 121(1) — Inward processing procedure — Release for free circulation — Incurrence of a customs debt — Determination of the debt — Concept of ‘taxation elements’ — Taking account of a preferential tariff measure)

7

2020/C 414/08

Case C-360/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — Crown Van Gelder BV v Autoriteit Consument en Markt (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market for electricity — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 37 — Duties and powers of the regulatory authority — Out-of-court dispute settlement — Concept of ‘party having a complaint’ — Complaint submitted by a final customer against the operator of a transmission system to which that customer’s installation is not directly connected — Failure on the grid — No contractual relationship between that customer and the operator of that grid — Admissibility of the complaint)

8

2020/C 414/09

Case C-443/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco — Spain) — Vodafone España SAU v Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications networks and services — Directive 2002/20/EC — Article 13 — Fee for rights of use for radio frequencies — Sectoral national legislation subjecting the allocation of public radio frequencies to a charge — National legislation subjecting the grant of administrative concessions on public assets to a tax on the transfer of assets)

8

2020/C 414/10

Case C-456/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen — Sweden) — Aktiebolaget Östgötatrafiken v Patent- och registreringsverket (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 3(1)(b) — Signs of which a trade mark may consist — Distinctive character — Application for registration as a trade mark of a sign in respect of a service, consisting of motifs of colour and intended to be affixed to goods used to provide that service — Assessment of the distinctive character of that sign — Criteria)

9

2020/C 414/11

Case C-476/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Göteborg — Sweden) — Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket v Combinova AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Union Customs Code — Article 124(1)(k) — Extinction of the customs debt in the event the goods are not used — Concept of ‘goods that have been used’ — Inward processing procedure — Customs debt incurred through non-compliance with requirements provided for under the inward processing procedure — Bill of discharge not submitted within the prescribed time limit)

10

2020/C 414/12

Case C-514/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Union des industries de la protection des plantes v Premier Ministre, Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire, Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé, Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation, Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environnement et du travail (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Placing of plant protection products on the market — Emergency measures — Officially informing the European Commission — Directive (EU) 2015/1535 — Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations — Neonicotinoids — Protection of bees — Principle of sincere cooperation)

10

2020/C 414/13

Case C-558/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj — Romania) — Impresa Pizzarotti & C SPA Italia Sucursala Cluj v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 49 and 63 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Free movement of capital — Calculation of the taxable income of companies — Persons having a relationship of interdependence — Unusual advantage granted by a resident branch to a non-resident company — Correction of the taxable income of the branch of a non-resident company — No correction of taxable income in the event of an identical advantage granted by a branch to a resident company — Principle of free competition — Restriction on freedom of establishment — Justification — Balanced allocation of the power to tax between Member States — Proportionality)

11

2020/C 414/14

Case C-568/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha — Spain) — MO v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Toledo (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/EC — Common standards and procedures for returning illegally staying third-country nationals — Article 6(1) and Article 8(1) — Illegal stay — National legislation providing for either a fine or removal, depending on the circumstances — Consequences of the judgment of 23 April 2015, Zaizoune (C-38/14, EU:C:2015:260) — National legislation more favourable to the interested party — Direct effect of directives — Limits)

12

2020/C 414/15

Case C-602/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln — Germany) — kohlpharma GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 34 and 36 TFEU — Free movement of goods — Quantitative restrictions — Measures having equivalent effect — Refusal to approve an amendment to the particulars and documents relating to a medicinal product which is the subject of a parallel import licence — Protection of the health and life of humans — Directive 2001/83/EC)

13

2020/C 414/16

Case C-641/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — EU v PE Digital GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Point 11 of Article 2, Article 14(3) and Article 16(m) — Distance contract — Supply of digital content and digital services — Right of withdrawal — Obligations of the consumer in the event of withdrawal — Determination of the amount to be paid by the consumer for the services provided before the exercise of the right of withdrawal — Exception to the right of withdrawal in the case of the supply of digital content)

13

2020/C 414/17

Case C-644/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia — Romania) — FT v Universitatea ‘Lucian Blaga’ Sibiu, GS and Others, HS, Ministerul Educaţiei Naţionale (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2000/78/EC — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Articles 1, 2 and 3 — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Measure taken by a university pursuant to national law — Retention of tenured lecturer status beyond the statutory retirement age — Possibility restricted to lecturers with doctoral supervisor status — Lecturers who do not have this status — Fixed-term employment contracts — Lower remuneration than for tenured lecturers)

14

2020/C 414/18

Case C-657/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt D v E (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Exemptions — Article 132(1)(g) — Supply of services closely linked to welfare and social security work — Preparation of expert reports on the level of care and support needs — Taxable person appointed by the medical service of a care and support insurance fund — Bodies recognised as being devoted to social wellbeing)

15

2020/C 414/19

Case C-711/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Admiral Sportwetten GmbH, Novomatic AG, AKO Gastronomiebetriebs GmbH v Magistrat der Stadt Wien (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive (EU) 2015/1535 — Article 1 — Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services — Definition of ‘technical regulation’ — Games of chance — Local duty on the operation of betting terminals — Tax rule — European Commission not notified — Enforceability against the taxpayer)

16

2020/C 414/20

Case C-320/18 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 — Crocs Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Gifi Diffusion (Appeal — Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Declaration of invalidity — Appeal which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate — Costs)

16

2020/C 414/21

Case C-610/19: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Vikingo Fővállalkozó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 168, 178, 220 and 226 — Principles of fiscal neutrality, of effectiveness and of proportionality — Right to deduct VAT — Refusal — Conditions for the existence of a supply of goods — Evasion — Proof — Penalty — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective judicial remedy)

17

2020/C 414/22

Case C-611/19: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Crewprint Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Principles of fiscal neutrality, of effectiveness and of proportionality — Right to VAT deduction — Refusal — Fraud — Proof — Chain of subcontractors)

18

2020/C 414/23

Case C-837/19: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — Super Bock Bebidas SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 17(6) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 168 and 176 — Exclusion from the right to deduct — Purchase of accommodation, food, drink, vehicle leases, fuel and tolls services — Standstill clause — Accession to the European Union)

18

2020/C 414/24

Case C-98/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 8 — Czech Republic) — mBank S.A. v PA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Jurisdiction in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State in which the consumer is domiciled — Article 18(2) — Proceedings brought against the consumer by the seller or supplier — Concept of ‘consumer’s domicile’ — Relevant time for determining the consumer’s domicile — Transfer of the consumer’s domicile after the conclusion of the contract and before the action is brought)

19

2020/C 414/25

Case C-135/20: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — JS v Câmara Municipal de Gondomar (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 5 — Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector — Successive contracts — Prohibition on converting fixed-term contracts to open-ended contracts — Whether permissible)

20

2020/C 414/26

Case C-137/20: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores — Portugal) — MV v SATA International — Serviços e Transportes Aéreos SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Scope — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory framework of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)

20

2020/C 414/27

Case C-690/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha (Spain) lodged on 19 September 2019 — XC v Subdelegación del Gobierno de Toledo

21

2020/C 414/28

Case C-284/20 P: Appeal brought on 29 June 2020 by Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 29 April 2020 in Case T-73/19, Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag v EUIPO — Scheppach Fabrikation von Holzbearbeitungsmaschinen (Wood-splitting tool)

21

2020/C 414/29

Case C-313/20 P: Appeal brought on 10 July 2020 by Abarca — Companhia de Seguros SA against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 29 April 2020 in Case T-106/19, Abarca v EUIPO — Abanca Corporación Bancaria (ABARCA SEGUROS)

21

2020/C 414/30

Case C-417/20: Request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) of 3 September 2020 — Viasat UK Ltd, Viasat Inc. v Institut belge des services postaux et des télécommunications (IBPT), État belge, Inmarsat Ventures SE

22

2020/C 414/31

Case C-419/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 8 September 2020 — F. Reyher Nchfg. GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg

22

2020/C 414/32

Case C-427/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 10 September 2020 — Flexi Montagetechnik GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Kiel

23

2020/C 414/33

Case C-433/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 15 September 2020 — Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft mbH v Strato AG

23

2020/C 414/34

Case C-461/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 24 September 2020 — Advania Sverige AB, Kammarkollegiet v Dustin Sverige AB

24

2020/C 414/35

Case C-486/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 1 October 2020 — Varuh človekovih pravic Republike Slovenije

24

2020/C 414/36

Case C-354/19: Order of the President of the Court of 25 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea Hovrätt — Sweden) — Novartis AG v Patent-och registreringsverket

25

2020/C 414/37

Case C-663/19: Order of the President of the Court of 24 August 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Gera — Germany) — MM v Volkswagen AG

25

2020/C 414/38

Case C-810/19: Order of the President of the Court of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — Flightright GmbH v Qatar Airways

25

2020/C 414/39

Case C-827/19: Order of the President of the Grand Chamber of the Court of 4 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Pontevedra — Spain) — D.A.T.A., L.F.A., A.M.A.G., L.F.A., J.G.C., S.C.C., A.C.V., A.A.G., A.C.A., L.C.A., N.P.B., P.C.A. v Ryanair D.A.C.

26

2020/C 414/40

Case C-904/19: Order of the President of the Court of 28 August 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie — Poland) — E. Sp. z o.o v K.S.

26

2020/C 414/41

Case C-943/19: Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — SIA ‘ONDO’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs

26

2020/C 414/42

Case C-944/19: Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — AS ‘4finance’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs

26

2020/C 414/43

Case C-945/19: Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — SIA ‘OC Finance’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs

27

2020/C 414/44

Case C-946/19: Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 25 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) — United Kingdom) — MG v HH

27

2020/C 414/45

Case C-252/20: Order of the President of the Court of 13 August 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — CY v Eurowings GmbH

27

General Court

2020/C 414/46

Joined Cases T-515/13 RENV and T-719/13 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Spain and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIG) and their investors — Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) — Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part — Selective nature — Obligation to state reasons — Recovery of the aid — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty)

28

2020/C 414/47

Case T-381/15 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — IMG v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Development cooperation — Implementation of the EU budget under indirect management — Decision suspending the applicant’s ability to conclude new delegation agreements for indirect management with the Commission — Unlawfulness — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Application for injunctive relief — Late submission of application — Modification of the nature of the reparation sought — Inadmissibility)

29

2020/C 414/48

Joined Cases T-401/16 and T-443/16: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Spain and Italy v Commission (Language regime — Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of Investigators and Team leaders — Language skills — Limitation of the choice of second language in the competitions to German, English and French — Eliminatory language-comprehension test in English — Language of communication — Regulation No 1 — Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations — Discrimination based on language — Justification — Interests of the service — Proportionality)

29

2020/C 414/49

Case T-249/17: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — Casino, Guichard-Perrachon and AMC v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Administrative procedure — Decision ordering an inspection — Plea of illegality against Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Right to an effective remedy — Equality of arms — Obligation to state reasons — Right to inviolability of the home — Sufficiently strong evidence — Proportionality)

30

2020/C 414/50

Case T-254/17: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — Intermarché Casino Achats v Commission (Competition — Cartels — Administrative procedure — Decision ordering an inspection — Plea of illegality of Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Right to an effective remedy — Equality of arms — Obligation to state reasons — Right to inviolability of the home — Reasonable grounds — Evidence of participation in the suspected infringements — Proportionality)

31

2020/C 414/51

Case T-255/17: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Administrative procedure — Decisions ordering an inspection — Plea of illegality against Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Right to an effective remedy — Obligation to state reasons — Right to inviolability of the home — Sufficiently strong evidence — Proportionality — Action for annulment — Complaints relating to manner of conduction the inspection — Refusal to protect the confidentiality of data relating to private life — Inadmissibility)

32

2020/C 414/52

Case T-380/17: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — HeidelbergCement and Schwenk Zement v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Market for grey cement in Croatia — Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement — Undertakings concerned — Relevant market — Substantial part of the internal market — Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition — Commitments — Rights of the defence — Partial referral to the national authorities)

33

2020/C 414/53

Cases T-77/18 and T-567/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — VE v ESMA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Appraisal report — 2016 appraisal exercise — Plea of illegality relating to the appraisals guide — Manifest error of assessment — Assessment of activities undertaken as staff representative — Procedural irregularity — Termination of the work contract — Insufficient performance during a period of two years)

33

2020/C 414/54

Case T-18/19: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — Brown v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Official with United Kingdom nationality at the date of entering the service — Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union — Acquisition of the nationality of the country of employment during the course of a career — Loss of the expatriation allowance — Equal treatment — Principle of non-discrimination — Article 4(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations)

34

2020/C 414/55

Case T-264/19: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — nanoPET Pharma v EUIPO — Miltenyi Biotec (viscover) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark viscover — Absence of bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001) — Article 53(2)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(2)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001))

35

2020/C 414/56

Case T-289/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Arbuzov v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State respected the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

35

2020/C 414/57

Case T-475/20: Action brought on 9 August 2020 — LE v Commission

36

2020/C 414/58

Case T-579/20: Action brought on 21 September 2020 — Genekam Biotechnology v Commission

37

2020/C 414/59

Case T-580/20: Action brought on 7 October 2020 — KC v Commission

38

2020/C 414/60

Case T-582/20: Action brought on 17 September 2020 — Ighoga Region 10 and Others v Commission

39

2020/C 414/61

Case T-588/20: Action brought on 25 September 2020 — MP v Commission

40

2020/C 414/62

Case T-602/20: Action brought on 30 September 2020 — MS v Commission

41

2020/C 414/63

Case T-606/20: Action brought on 30 September 2020 — Austrian Power Grid and Others v ACER

41

2020/C 414/64

Case T-607/20: Action brought on 30 September 2020 — Austrian Power Grid and Others v ACER

42

2020/C 414/65

Case T-611/20: Action brought on 2 October 2020 — Airoldi Metalli v Commission

43

2020/C 414/66

Case T-617/20: Action brought on 5 October 2020 — Standardkessel Baumgarte Holding v EUIPO (Standardkessel)

44

2020/C 414/67

Case T-623/20: Action brought on 9 October 2020 — Sun West and Others v Commission

45

2020/C 414/68

Case T-626/20: Action brought on 12 October 2020 — Landwärme v Commission

46

2020/C 414/69

Case T-628/20: Action brought on 16 October 2020 — Ryanair v Commission

47

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN