alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,366
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,905
<ALLOWANCES>                                       432
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,839
<PP&E>                                           2,762
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,057
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,847
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,702
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,863
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,145
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,718
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,718
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.64
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 99.23**

** **

**CONSENT OFClifford Lusby**

** **

March 27, 2013

 

Brigus Gold Corp.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

 

**Re: Brigus Gold Corp.**

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

I hereby consent to (i) the use of my name in connection withthe following documents and reports, which are either referenced in or filed as exhibits with the Annual Report on Form 40-F forthe year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Form 40-F”) of Brigus Gold Corp. (the “Company”) to which this consentrelates: (A) the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report, Pre-feasibility Study, Brigus Gold Corp., GoldfieldsProject, Saskatchewan, Canada” dated effective October 6, 2011 (the “Report”), (B) the Company’s AnnualInformation Form for the year ended December 31, 2012 and (C) the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis forthe year ended December 31, 2012, (ii) the inclusion or incorporation by reference of information derived from the Report in theRegistration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-113889, 333-162558 and 333-167757), as amended, and Form F-10 (File No. 333-174604),as amended, or any related abbreviated registration statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commissionpursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or in any amendment to any of the foregoing, or to any prospectusesor amendments or supplements thereto and (iii) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference inthe above-referenced Registration Statements and in any prospectuses or amendments or supplements thereto.
#### Jesus FERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. E. Wilson PURDY, as Sheriff of Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 41016.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 14, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 12, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 245 So.2d 697.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal C 26/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 26 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5130 January 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 26

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5130 January 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2008/C 026/01 | Special report No 9/2007 concerning ‘Evaluating the EU Research and Technological Development (RTD) framework programmes — could the Commission's approach be improved?’ together with the Commission's replies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Court of Auditors

2008/C 026/01

Special report No 9/2007 concerning ‘Evaluating the EU Research and Technological Development (RTD) framework programmes — could the Commission's approach be improved?’ together with the Commission's replies

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Walter DANIELS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-136.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 26, 1970.

Walter Daniels, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Daniels v. State, 217 So.2d 144 (Fla.App.1969); Pearsall v. State, 215 So.2d 58 (Fla.App.1968); Jolly v. Wainwright, 175 So.Zd 245 (Fla. App.1965), and Davis v. State, 44 Fla. 32, 32 So. 822 (1902).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
#### Robert Bain DICKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-747.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 21, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Indian River County; D. C. Smith, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Occupational Safety and Health Administration

          - 29 CFR Part 1910

### CFR Correction

§ 1910.1043 

In Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1910 (§ 1910.1000 to end of part 1910), revised as of July 1, 2017, on page 297, paragraphs § 1910.1043(i)(1)(i)(A) through (F) are removed.

[FR Doc. 2018-13909 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 1301-00-D
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION of CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT to SECTION 1350 of CHAPTER 63 of TITLE 18 of the UNITED
STATES CODE,

as ADOPTED PURSUANT to

SECTION 906 of THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report
of Frischs Restaurants, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 12, 2006 (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Registrant certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |     |  |                        
|---------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|January 15, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Craig F. Maier     
|                 |  |     |  | Craig F. Maier         
|                 |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a  14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that
Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as other otherwise stated in such filing.
263 La. 990

#### ORTLIEB PRESS, INC. v. Ashton J. MOUTON, Collector of Revenue.

No. 53036.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 21, 1972.

In re: Ashton J. Mouton, Collector of Revenue applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 268 So.2d 85.

Writ refused. The case having been remanded for further proceedings, the judgment is not final.
# Official Journal L 212/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.212.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 212 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5312 August 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.212.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 212

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5312 August 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 709/2010 of 22 July 2010 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 709/2010 of 22 July 2010 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of G&K Services, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    By:
    /s/ Jeffrey L. WrightJeffrey L. Wright, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Director
(Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29540-29541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13513]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Industry and Security.
    Title: Statement by Ultimate Consignee and Purchaser.
    Form Number(s): BIS-711.
    OMB Control Number: 0694-0021.
    Type of Review: Regular submission.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 110.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 414.
    Estimated Time per Response: 16 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: The collection is necessary under Part 748.11 of 
the EAR. This section states that the Form BIS-711, Statement by 
Ultimate Consignee and Purchaser, or a statement on company letterhead 
(in accordance with 748.11(b)(1)), must provide information on the 
foreign importer receiving the U.S. technology and how the technology 
will be utilized. The BIS-711 or letter provides assurances from the 
importer that the technology will not be misused, transferred or re-
exported in violation of the EAR.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov 
http://www.reginfo.gov/public/. Follow the

[[Page 29541]]

instructions to view Department of Commerce collections currently under 
review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ad5d3c8dbc5c9eff8f7f3e9e9f3f5f4daf5f7f8b4fff5eab4fdf5ec"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88c7c1dac9d7dbfdeae5e1fbfbe1e7e6c8e7e5eaa6ede7f8a6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>.

Sheleen Dumas,
Departmental Lead PRA Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-13513 Filed 6-22-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.1Director CompensationCompensation of directors who are not salaried employees of Avatar Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) is$32,500 per annum. Members of the Executive Committee who are not salaried employees of theCompany receive a retainer of $2,000 per annum. Members and the Chairperson of the Audit Committeereceive additional compensation of $12,000 and $14,000 per annum, respectively. Members and theChairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receive additional compensation of$4,000 and $7,000, respectively. Members and the Chairperson of the Compensation Committee receiveadditional compensation of $4,000 and $5,000 per annum, respectively.Non-employee directors may elect to defer up to 50% of their annual cash retainer and any committeefees into shares of common stock of the Company (the “Common Stock”) under the Avatar Holdings Inc.Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2005 Restatement), as amended(the “Plan”). The cash amount of the deferral is converted into notional shares of Common Stockbased on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the date such fees would otherwise bepayable in cash. Such notional shares (including any notional dividend equivalents) are convertedinto an equivalent number of shares of Common Stock and distributed to the non-employee director ondates selected by the director (or, if earlier, the date on which such director no longer serves asa member of the Board of Directors).In addition, under the Plan, non-employee directors may receive discretionary utility awards forservice on the Board of Directors. On May 31, 2007 (the “Award Date”), each non-employee directorwas awarded 180 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) for service as a director for the term beginningMay 31, 2007. The RSUs will vest and be converted into an equivalent number of shares of CommonStock upon the earlier of the first anniversary of the Award Date and the date immediatelypreceding the date of the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, provided that suchnon-employee director is a member of the Board of Directors of the Company on such vesting date.The RSUs will vest immediately upon the death or disability of the non-employee director or upon achange in control of the Company. If the non-employee director ceases to be a member of the Boardfor any other reason, the RSUs will be forfeited.Directors who are salaried employees of the Company do not receive additional compensation forserving on the Board of Directors.Members of the Board of Directors are reimbursed for actual expenses in connection with attendingBoard, committee and stockholder meetings.
<PAGE>
                    GATEWAY ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

               STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                     EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Quarter ended
                                                            -------------
                                                     May 31,           May 31,
                                                      1998              1997
                                                    ----------       ----------
<S>                                                 <C>              <C>
Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding for basic earnings per share          14,454,700       14,059,400

Potential dilutive common shares:
 Add shares issuable pursuant to warrant
  agreements less shares assumed repurchased
  at the average market price                           56,700 (1)          -

 Add shares issuable pursuant to stock options
  less shares assumed repurchased at the
  average market price                                  22,000 (1)          -

 Add shares issuable from assumed conversion
   of convertible promissory notes                   1,863,700 (1)       25,000 (1)
                                                   -----------       ----------

Tentative number of shares for computation
 of diluted earnings per share                      16,397,100       14,084,400
                                                   -----------       ----------
                                                   -----------       ----------

Earnings (loss) applicable to common stock         $  (556,600)      $   60,400

 Add back interest expense for convertible
  promissory notes assumed converted                    13,600           19,000
                                                   -----------       ----------

Tentative earnings (loss) for computation of
 diluted earnings per share                        $  (543,000)      $   79,400
                                                   -----------       ----------
                                                   -----------       ----------

Basic loss per common share                        $     (0.04)      $    0.004
                                                   -----------       ----------
                                                   -----------       ----------

Diluted loss per common share (2)                  $     (0.04)      $    0.004
                                                   -----------       ----------
                                                   -----------       ----------

</TABLE>

(1)  Not used in diluted earnings per share  calculation as effect would be
     antidilutive.
(2)  Determined based upon the loss applicable to common stock divided by the
     weighted average number of common shares since the effect of potential
     dilutive shares is anti-dilutive.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-19-00046-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

Trial Court No. CV18-1720

Before Bassel, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE SSCP MANAGEMENT, INC., SDHAROD ENTERPRISES, INC., APPLE 

TEXAS RESTAURANTS, INC., TEXAS APPLE, LLC, SRS REAL ESTATE 

PARTNERS, LLC, AND SRS NATIONAL NET LEASE GROUP, LP, Relators
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus is dismissed as moot.

1

Per Curiam

Delivered: March 1, 2019

 

1It has come to the court’s attention that Respondent has entered an amended order; 

thus, the order that is at the crux of the petition for writ of mandamus is no longer at issue.
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(r eleased the week prior to June 23, 2020 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :



### A

- 19

- 882 State v. Smith

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov: http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here: http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c cales/

.
256 La. 857

#### PORT FINANCE COMPANY, Inc. v. John H. DAIGLE.

No. 50758.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 30, 1970.

In re: John H. Daigle applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 236 So.2d 256.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.