Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Notices 30149 

between recruits/trainees and their 

respective recruiters/trainers is 

inherently destructive to good order and 

discipline. 

(2) Prohibited activity. The 

responsibility for identifying 

relationships subject to this offense and 

those outside the scope of this offense 

is entrusted to the individual Services to 

determine and specify by appropriate 

regulations. This offense is intended to 

cover those situations which involve the 

improper use of authority by virtue of 

an individual’s position in either a 

training or recruiting environment. Not 

all contact or associations are prohibited 

by this article. Service regulations must 

consider circumstances where preexisting relationships (for example, 

marriage relationships) exist. 

Additionally, this offense only 

criminalizes activity occurring when 

there is a training or recruiting 

relationship between the accused and 

the alleged victim of this offense. 

(3) Knowledge. The accused must 

have actual or constructive knowledge 

that a person was a ‘‘specially protected 

junior member of the armed forces’’ or 

an ‘‘applicant for military service’’ (as 

those terms are defined in this offense). 

Knowledge may be proved by 

circumstantial evidence. 

(4) Consent. Consent is not a defense 

to this offense.’’ 

(d) Paragraph 69.c.(1) is amended and 

reads as follows: 

‘‘(1) ‘‘Access’’ means to gain entry to, 

instruct, cause input to, cause output 

from, cause data processing with, or 

communicate with, the logical, 

arithmetical, or memory function 

resources of a computer, computer 

system, or computer network.’’ 

(e) Paragraph 89.c.(2) is amended and 

reads as follows: 

‘‘(2) Personnel action. For purposes of 

this offense, ‘‘personnel action’’ 

means— 

(a) any action taken against a 

Servicemember that affects, or has the 

potential to affect, that Servicemember’s 

current position or career, including 

promotion, disciplinary or other 

corrective action, transfer or 

reassignment, performance evaluations, 

decisions concerning pay, benefits, 

awards, or training, relief or removal, 

separation, discharge, referral for mental 

health evaluations, and any other 

personnel actions as defined by law or 

regulation, such as DoD Directive 

7050.06 (17 April 2015); or, 

(b) any action taken against a civilian 

employee that affects, or has the 

potential to affect, that person’s current 

position or career, including promotion, 

disciplinary or other corrective action, 

transfer or reassignment, performance 

evaluations, decisions concerning pay, 

benefits, awards, or training, relief and 

removal, discharge, and any other 

personnel actions as defined by law or 

regulation such as 5 U.S.C. 2302.’’ 

Dated: June 21, 2018. 

Aaron T. Siegel, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2018–13783 Filed 6–26–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket ID: DOD–2018–OS–0037] 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Under Secretary of Defense for 

Acquisition and Sustainment, DoD. 

ACTION: Information collection notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 

Defense Logistics Agency announces a 

proposed public information collection 

and seeks public comment on the 

provisions thereof. Comments are 

invited on: Whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed information collection; ways 

to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and ways to minimize the 

burden of the information collection on 

respondents, including through the use 

of automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

DATES: Consideration will be given to all 

comments received by August 27, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by docket number and title, 

by any of the following methods: 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Mail: Department of Defense, Office of 

the Chief Management Officer, 

Directorate for Oversight and 

Compliance, 4800 Mark Center Drive, 

Mailbox #24 Suite 08D09, Alexandria, 

VA 22350–1700. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name, docket 

number and title for this Federal 

Register document. The general policy 

for comments and other submissions 

from members of the public is to make 

these submissions available for public 

viewing on the internet at http://

www.regulations.gov as they are 

received without change, including any 

personal identifiers or contact 

information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 

request more information on this 

proposed information collection or to 

obtain a copy of the proposal and 

associated collection instruments, 

please write to ODASD (Supply Chain 

Integration), 3500 Defense Pentagon RM 

1E518, Washington DC 20301–3500, 

Anthony VanBuren, 

anthony.d.vanburen.ctr@mail.mil or 

(571) 372–5259. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Associated Form; and OMB 

Number: Defense Materiel Disposition 

Procedures for the Sale of DoD Materiel; 

DRMS 1645, DRMS 2006, SF 114–A; 

OMB Control Number 0704–0534. 

Needs and Uses: This collection 

allows the Department of Defense (DoD) 

and its representatives to assess the 

ability of prospective purchasers to 

comply with applicable laws and 

regulations before the sale of materiel. 

Defense Reutilization and Marketing 

Service (DRMS) Form 1645, ‘‘Statement 

of Intent,’’ and Standard Form (SF) 114– 

A, ‘‘Sale of Government Property—Item 

Bid Page—Sealed Bid,’’ are used to 

identify the nature of the purchaser’s 

business, where the materials will be 

stored, and what the buyer’s intentions 

are with the materiel (i.e., use the 

materiel as intended, re-sell to others, 

scrap the materiel for recovery of 

contents, or re-refine or re-process the 

materiel). These forms are used to 

determine if DRMS Form 2006, ‘‘PreAward/Post-Award On-Site Review,’’ 

will also be needed; DRMS Form 2006 

allows DoD components to determine if 

the purchaser is capable of meeting 

environmental and hazardous material 

handling responsibilities, in compliance 

with CFR part 102 of Title 41. 

Compliance with this regulation must 

be ascertained before DoD components 

may make an award of hazardous and 

dangerous property. 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit. 

Annual Burden Hours: 232. 

Number of Respondents: 72. 

Responses per Respondent: 2.63. 

Annual Responses: 189. 

Average Burden per Response: 1.23 

hours. 

Frequency: On occasion. 

Dated: June 21, 2018. 

Shelly E. Finke, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2018–13838 Filed 6–26–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES