30776 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2018 / Notices 

BURDEN TABLE—Continued 

Citation 

30 CFR part 

580, as applicable 

Reporting and recordkeeping requirements Hour burden Average number of 

annual responses 

Annual burden 

hours 

Non-hour cost burden 1

60; 61 ................................ Request reimbursement for costs of reproducing 

data/information & certain processing costs.

1 1 request 3 ....................... 1 

70 ...................................... Enter disclosure agreement ....................................... 4 1 agreement .................... 4 

72(b) .................................. Submit comments on BOEM’s intent to disclose 

data/information for reproduction, processing, and 

interpretation.

4 1 response ....................... 4 

72(d) .................................. Independent contractor or agent prepares and signs 

written commitment not to sell, trade, license, or 

disclose data/information without BOEM approval.

4 2 submissions .................. 8 

Subtotal ...................... .................................................................................... ........................ 13 Responses .................. 44 

General 

Part 580 ............................ General departure and alternative compliance requests not specifically covered elsewhere in Part 

580 regulations.

4 1 request .......................... 4 

Permits 4 ............................ Request extension of permit/authorization time period.1 2 requests ........................ 2 

Permits 4 ............................ Retain G&G data/information for 10 years and make 

available to BOEM upon request.

1 4 respondents .................. 4 

Subtotal ...................... .................................................................................... ........................ 7 Responses .................... 10 

Total Burden ....... .................................................................................... ........................ 38 Responses .................. 485 

$4,024 non-hour cost burdens 

1Fees are subject to modification for inflation annually. 

2Only permits, not authorizations, are subject to cost recovery. 

3 No requests received for many years. Minimal burden for regulatory (PRA) purposes only. 

4These permits/authorizations are prepared by BOEM and sent to respondents; therefore, the forms themselves do not incur burden hours. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor and a person is not required to 

respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

The authority for this action is the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

Dated: June 22, 2018. 

Deanna Meyer-Pietruszka, 

Chief, Office of Policy, Regulation and 

Analysis. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14046 Filed 6–28–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1121] 

Certain Earpiece Devices and 

Components Thereof; Institution of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on May 

24, 2018, under section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of 

Bose Corporation of Framingham, 

Massachusetts. A supplemental exhibit 

was filed on June 8, 2018. The 

complaint alleges violations of section 

337 based upon the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain earpiece 

devices and components thereof by 

reason of infringement of U.S. Patent 

No. 9,036,852 (‘‘the ’852 patent’’); U.S. 

Patent No. 9,036,853 (‘‘the ’853 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 9,042,590 (‘‘the ’590 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,311,253 (‘‘the 

’253 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,249,287 

(‘‘the ’287 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 

9,398,364 (‘‘the ’364 patent’’). The 

complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by the applicable Federal 

Statute. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

general or limited exclusion order, or in 

the alternative a limited exclusion 

order, and cease and desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2018 / Notices 30777 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2Commissioner Kearns did not participate in this 

five-year review. 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

June 22, 2018, Ordered That— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of products identified in 

paragraph (2) by reason of infringement 

of one or more of claims 1, 5, 7, 9, and 

14 of the ’852 patent; claims 1–3, 6, 8, 

10, and 11 of the ’853 patent; claims 1, 

3, 4, 6, 7, and 10 of the ’590 patent; 

claims 1, 3, 4, and 6 of the ’253 patent; 

claims 1 and 6–8 of the ’287 patent; and 

claims 1, 2, 5, 8, 11, and 16 of the ’364 

patent; and whether an industry in the 

United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘in-ear headphones and 

accessories using a retaining structure to 

secure the device in a user’s ear’’; 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Bose 

Corporation, 100 Mountain Road, 

Framingham, MA 01701. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

1MORE USA, Inc., 10225 Barnes 

Canyon Road, Suite A202, San Diego, 

CA 92121 

APSkins, 140 Lakeside Avenue, Suite A 

#334, Seattle, WA 98122 

Beeebo Online Limited, 3837 Bay Lake 

Trail, Suite 115, North Las Vegas, NV 

89030 

iHip, 19 Progress Street, Edison, NJ 

08820 

LMZT LLC, 303 Louisiana Avenue, 

Brooklyn, NY 11207 

Misodiko, NanShanQu XiLiJieDao 

PingShanCun, 192 Dong 509, 

ShenZhen GuangDong 518055 China 

Phaiser LLC, 909 Silber Road, Houston, 

TX 77024 

Phonete, A–201 No. 1 Qianwan Yilu, 

Qianhai Shenggang hezuoqu, 

Shenzhen, China 

REVJAMS, 248 Lafayette Street, New 

York, NY 10012 

SMARTOMI Products, Inc., 2760 E 

Philadelphia Street, Ontario, CA 

91761 

Spigen, Inc., 9975 Toledo Way, Suite 

100, Irvine, CA 92618–1826 

Sudio AB, Upplandsgatan 7, 111 23 

Stockholm, Sweden 

Sunvalley Tek International, Inc., 46724 

Lakeview Boulevard, Fremont, CA 

94538 

TomRich, Room842, 3B, 

HuaNanXiYuan, PingHu Town, 

LongGang District, Shenzhen, 518100 

China 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: June 25, 2018. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2018–13962 Filed 6–28–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–921 (Third 

Review)] 

Folding Gift Boxes From China 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year review, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines,2 pursuant to the Tariff Act 

of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of 

the antidumping duty order on folding 

gift boxes from China would be likely to 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. 

Background 

The Commission, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), 

instituted this review on February 1, 

2018 (83 FR 4679) and determined on 

May 7, 2018 that it would conduct an 

expedited review (83 FR 24341, May 25, 

2018). 

The Commission made this 

determination pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It 

completed and filed its determination in 

this review on July 2, 2018. The views 

of the Commission are contained in 

USITC Publication 4800 (July 2018), 

entitled Folding Gift Boxes from China: 

Investigation No. 731–TA–921 (Third 

Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: June 26, 2018. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2018–14061 Filed 6–28–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES