alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 306/30 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 306 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6430 July 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 306

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6430 July 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 306/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 306/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-11422 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DAVID WAYNE WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-22-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * David Wayne Wright appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. Wright contends that the sentence was unreasonable and that the district court failed to consider the sentencing factors set forth at 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Article III, § 2, of the Constitution limits federal court jurisdiction to actual cases and controversies. See Spencer v. Kemna , 523 U.S. 1, 7No. 04-11422 -2- (1998). The case-or-controversy requirement demands that “some concrete and continuing injury other than the now-ended incarceration or parole -- some ‘collateral consequence’ of the conviction -- must exist if the suit is to be maintained.” Id. Wright has served the sentence that was imposed upon the revocation of his supervised release. The order revoking Wright’s term of supervised release imposed no further term of supervised release. Accordingly, there is no case or controversy for this court to address, and the appeal is dismissed as moot.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### Robert E. SPOONER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2464.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 7, 1978.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Stuart A. Young, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments of conviction are affirmed, but the sentences are vacated and the case remanded for resentencing with directions that the trial court disclose to the defendant, a reasonable time prior to sentencing, any factual material contained in the confidential portion of the presentence investigation which is not found in the non-confidential portion. *Campbell v. State,*342 So.2d 1010 (Fla.4th DCA 1977); *Bronson*v. *State,*345 So.2d 872 (Fla.2d DCA 1977); *Cunningham v. State,*349 So.2d 702 (Fla.4th DCA 1977).

ALDERMAN, C. J., and ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         313,890
<SECURITIES>                                 5,881,202
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,195,259
<ALLOWANCES>                                   140,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,612,539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,616,909
<PP&E>                                         645,678
<DEPRECIATION>                                 262,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,160,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,054,131
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,400
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,998,838
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,160,369
<SALES>                                     15,987,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,987,636
<CGS>                                       12,484,237
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,484,237
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               115,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (422,839)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                226,334
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (786,430)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,012,764
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,012,764
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 8.1**
**List of material subsidiaries**   **Legal Entity** **Country of Incorporation**   **100% owned subsidiaries of ASML Holding N.V.:**  ASML Netherlands B.V. Netherlands (Veldhoven)ASML Finance B.V. Netherlands (Veldhoven)ASML MaskTools B.V. Netherlands (Veldhoven)ASML Germany GmbH Germany (Dresden)ASML France S.a.r.l. France (Montbonnot)ASML (UK) Ltd. UK (Paisley (Scotland))ASML Israel (2001) Ltd. Israel (Ramat-Gan)ASML Ireland Ltd. Ireland (Dublin)ASML Italy S.r.l. Italy (Avezzano)ASML Hong Kong Ltd. Hong Kong SARASML Singapore Pte. Ltd. SingaporeASML Korea Co. Ltd. Korea (Kyunggi-Do)ASML Japan Co. Ltd. Japan (Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa-Ken)ASML Shanghai International Trading Co. Ltd. China/ Shanghai Free Trade ZoneASML (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. China (Tianjin)ASML Taiwan Ltd. Republic of China (Hsinchu)ASML Equipment Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia (Penang)ASML US, Inc. US (Delaware)   **100% owned subsidiaries of ASML US, Inc.:**  ASML Capital US, Inc. US (Delaware)ASML MaskTools Inc. US (Delaware)   **100% owned subsidiaries of ASML Hong Kong Ltd.:**  ASML Macau Commercial Offshore Ltd. Macau
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS OF GARAN, INCORPORATED
AND SUBSIDIARIES ANNEXED HERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000039917
<NAME> GARAN, INCORPORATED
       
<S>                             <C>                    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996 
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1995 
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995 
<CASH>                                      10,559,000 
<SECURITIES>                                19,689,000 
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,100,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   514,000 
<INVENTORY>                                 29,780,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            82,850,000
<PP&E>                                      33,410,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,626,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             114,458,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,954,000
<BONDS>                                      3,038,000
<COMMON>                                     2,535,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  91,093,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               114,458,000
<SALES>                                     33,024,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,024,000
<CGS>                                       26,550,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,550,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,219,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   878,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,341,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        

</TABLE>
Mailing Address

451 Seventh Street, SW, B-133

Washington, DC 20410

425 3rd Street, SW, Fourth Floor

Washington, DC 20024

(202) 475-4914

January 29, 2019

The Global Market Analysis Report for January 2019 was not 

published due to the partial government shutdown. We will 

resume publication by February mid-month for the February 2019 

Report.

Thank You,

Ginnie Mae
#### Mrs. Kathryn McNEAL, Individually and as Tutrix of her Minor Child, Myrna McNeal v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 53091.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 15, 1973.

In re: Mrs. Kathryn McNeal, individually and as tutrix of her minor child, Myrria McNeal applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides, 269 So.2d 499.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents from the granting of this writ. See Johnson v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., 256 La. 289, 236 So.2d 216 (1970).
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 18 , 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00486

- CR

JOHN PAUL CARDENAS , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1289128

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a guilty plea to aggravated assault of a child under fourteen years of age. The trial court deferred adjudicating guilt and placed appellant on community supervision for a term of eight years. Subsequently, the State moved to adjudicate guilt. Appellant entered a plea of true to the allegations
in the motion. The trial court adjudicated guilt and on April 29, 2013, sentenced appellant to confinement for fifteen years in the Institutional Division of the Texas2

Department of Criminal Justice
, and assessed a $500.00 fine. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.
The record reflects appellant waived his right of appeal as part of his agreement to plead true to the mot ion to adjudicate guilt. In exchange, the State recommended appellant be sentenced to confinement for fifteen years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and fined $500.00. Negotiated waivers of the right of appeal are v alid if the defendant waived the right of appeal knowing with certainty the punishment that would be
assessed. See Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615 (Tex.Crim.App. 2003). Appellant was fully aware of the likely consequences when he waived his right to appeal and was sentenced by the trial court in accordance with the State ’ s recommendation. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 220 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Frost an d Donovan.
Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
**EXHIBIT 32.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Jeffrey L. Wright, certify that:4. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of G&K Services, Inc.; 5. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 6. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report.Date: November 4, 2005         By:        /s/ Jeffrey L. Wright    Jeffrey L. Wright, Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer
#### Clifton JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-196.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 13, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1999 and the Statement Of Income
for the year ended September 30, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,227
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,408<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,164<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (36,756)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                (36,756)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (36,756)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (35.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (35.01)
<FN>
<F1> Dividend Income.
<F2> Legal and Accounting fees.
</FN>

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.9
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
Nos. 333-01574, 333-12789, and 333-24581 on Form S-8, Registration Statements
Nos. 333-10383 and 333-14025 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement No.
333-13133 on Form S-4 of U.S. Office Products Company of our report dated
September 23, 1996, on the financial statements of MTA, Inc. as of and for the
period ended December 31, 1995, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
U.S. Office Products Company for the year ended April 26, 1997.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Seattle, Washington
June 30, 1997
# Fourth Court of A ppeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 17, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00238

- CV

PREMIEANT INCORPORATED DBA PREMIEANT,

Appellant s

v.

Constance SNO WDEN as next Friend and Legal Guardian of Annette Snowden, an incapacitated Person, Appellee s

From the 224th Judicial Distric t Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI14231 The Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal. On May 7, 2019, we ordered appellant to provide written proof that it had paid or made satisfactory arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the reporter’s record. On May 15, 2019, appellant notified the court that the court reporter’s fee has been paid. Therefore, w e ORDER the court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal, Mary Scopas, to file the reporter’s record on or before May 28, 2019

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.1, 35.3(c).

________________________________ _ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of May, 2019

.

_______________________________ ____ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
# Official Journal C 202/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 202 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6112 June 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 202

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6112 June 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| 2018/C 202/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

2018/C 202/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1

1

---

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
On remand, the district court made the following 

determinations: 

Plaintiff failed to demonstrate good faith or the 

exercise of due diligence regarding the filing of a 

substitution of attorney [sic]. Furthermore, 

Plaintiff failed to demonstrate a reasonable basis 

for the Court to extend the time period for filing a 

motion to substitute beyond the 90-day, limit 

NRCP 25(a)(1) imposes following a suggestion of 

death, and Plaintiff failed to demonstrate the 

nonmoving party would not suffer prejudice by an 

enlargement of the specified time. 

Based on these determinations, the district court concluded that excusable 

neglect had not been established and again dismissed appellant's case for 

failure to file a motion to substitute within NRCP 25(a)(1)'s time frame. 

Appellant contends that the district court did not make any 

factual findings but instead simply concluded summarily that the four 

Moseley factors were not satisfied.' We agree. Similar to the first appeal 

in this case, the district court's order does not articulate a factual basis for 

its conclusion that appellant had not established excusable neglect. Cf. 

Jitnan v. Oliver, 127 Nev., Adv. Op. 35, 254 P.3d 623, 629 (2011) ("Without 

an explanation of the reasons or bases for a district court's decision, 

meaningful appellate review. . . is hampered because we are left to mere 

speculation."). Accordingly, we 

'We have not considered appellant's arguments that were not first 

raised in district court. See Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. Brown, 97 Nev. 49, 52, 

623 P.2d 981, 983 (1981). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A (41004 
J. 

ORDER the judgment of the district court VACATED AND 

REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with 

this order. 2 

cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court 

Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge 

Persi J. Mishel, Settlement Judge 

Richard Harris Law Firm 

Nikolas L. Mastrangelo 

Moran Brandon Bendavid Moran 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2 0n remand, we instruct the district court clerk to reassign this case 

to a different department. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

3 

(0) 1947A e(fe
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1


              EXCERPT FROM RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
                           PATTERSON-UTI ENERGY, INC.


"Section 2.  COMMON STOCK

         2.1 Issuance, Consideration, and Terms. Any unissued shares of the
Common Stock may be issued from time to time for such consideration, having a
value of not less than the par value thereof, as may be fixed from time to time
by the Board of Directors. Any treasury shares may be disposed of for such
consideration as may be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors.
The Common Stock shall be subject to the express terms of the Preferred Stock
and any series thereof. Each share of Common Stock shall be of equal rank and
shall be identical to every other share of Common Stock. Holders of Common Stock
shall have such rights as are provided herein and by law.

         2.2 Voting Rights. Except as expressly required by law or as provided
in or fixed and determined pursuant to Section 1 of this Article FOURTH, the
entire voting power and all voting rights shall be vested exclusively in the
Common Stock. Each holder of shares of Common Stock shall be entitled to one (1)
vote for each share standing in such holder's name on the books of the
Corporation.

         2.3 Dividends. Subject to Section 1 of this Article FOURTH, the holders
of Common Stock shall be entitled to receive, and shall share equally share for
share, when and as declared by the Board of Directors, out of the assets of the
Corporation which are by law available therefor, dividends or distributions
payable in cash, in property, or in securities of the Corporation."