alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 849

To amend title 1 of the United States Code to define the type of adjournment

that prevents the return of a bill by the President, and to authorize

the Clerk of the House of Representatives and the Secretary of the

Senate to receive bills returned by the President at any time their

respective Houses are not in session.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. DERRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on the Judiciary and Rules

A BILL

To amend title 1 of the United States Code to define the

type of adjournment that prevents the return of a bill

by the President, and to authorize the Clerk of the

House of Representatives and the Secretary of the Senate to receive bills returned by the President at any

time their respective Houses are not in session.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 849 IH

1 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 1, UNITED STATES

2 CODE.

3 Chapter 2 of title 1 of the United States Code is

4 amended by inserting at the end thereof the following new

5 section:

6 ‘‘§ 115. Adjournment preventing return of bill; Clerk

7 of the House of Representatives and Sec8 retary of the Senate authorized to receive

9 bills returned when their respective

10 Houses not in session

11 ‘‘(a) No adjournment of either House of Congress,

12 other than an adjournment sine die to end a Congress,

13 prevents the return of a bill by the President.

14 ‘‘(b) The Clerk of the House of Representatives and

15 the Secretary of the Senate are authorized to receive bills

16 returned by the President at any time their respective

17 Houses are not in session.’’.

18 SEC. 2. CLERICAL AMENDMENT.

19 The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 2

20 of title 1 of the United States Code is amended by adding

21 at the end the following new item:

‘‘115. Adjournment preventing return of bill; Clerk of the House of Representatives and Secretary of the Senate authorized to receive bills returned when their respective Houses not in session.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-12923, 333-53017, 333-33636, 333-94169 and 333-58754) of Incara Pharmaceuticals Corporation of our report dated December 20, 2001, except for Notes D and P, as to which the date is
August 6, 2002, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.





/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP





Raleigh, North Carolina


August 12, 2002
#### Don MEIKELJOHN, Director of the State Beverage Department, v. PENSACOLA YACHT CLUB.

No. 38698.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Appeals dismissed without opinion.
[ARTICLE] 5
[MULTIPLIER]   1,000
Part II.  Other information,   Item 6a.
Exhibit 11.1
 
                              INPUT SOFTWARE, INC.
             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                (UNAUDITED)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                              Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
                                 September 30,       September 30,
                             ------------------- -------------------
                               1998      1997      1998      1997
                             --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S>                          <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Net income (loss)...........     $354        $7   ($2,037)     $893
                             ========= ========= ========= =========
 
Shares used in basic EPS
 calculation................    5,352     7,095     5,890     7,312
 
Dilutive effect of stock
 options....................       88        10       105        28
                             --------- --------- --------- ---------
Shares used in diluted EPS
 calculation................    5,440     7,105     5,995     7,340
                             ========= ========= ========= =========
 
Basic EPS...................    $0.07     $0.00    ($0.35)    $0.12
 
Diluted EPS.................    $0.07     $0.00    ($0.35)    $0.12
                             ========= ========= ========= =========
 
</TABLE>
#### Jacquelyn S. DINO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1188.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 26, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 4.1
                                                                    ------------

                                     [LOGO]


                                                        CUSIP Number 26138T 10 6


SPECIMEN
        ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS FEBRUARY 28, 2001

                              DR. OWL ONLINE, INC.

   CAPITAL STOCK: 100,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK @ $.0001 PAR VALUE. FULLY PAID
                               AND NON-ASSESSABLE



THIS  CERTIFIES  THAT________________________________  is  the registered holder
of___________________  SHARES OF THE  CAPITAL  STOCK  OF  DR. OWL ONLINE, INC..,
transferable  only  on  the  books  of  the Corporation by the holder hereof, in
person  or  by  duly  authorized  attorney,  upon  surrender of this Certificate
properly endorsed or accompanied by a proper assignment. This Certificate is not
valid  until  countersigned  and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.

IN  WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed in
facsimile  by its duly authorized officer and the facsimile corporate seal to be
duly  affixed  hereto.



DATED:
      --------------

SECRETARY                                    CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND PRESIDENT

/S/  ANTHONY  R.  HUANG                           /S/  ANTHONY  R.  HUANG
-------------------------                         ---------------------------
ANTHONY  R.  HUANG                                ANTHONY  R.  HUANG


<PAGE>
The  corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests
the  powers,  designations,  preferences and relative participating, optional or
other  special  rights  of  each  class  of  stock  or  series  thereof  and the
qualifications,  limitations  or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights.

The  following  abbreviations,  when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate,  shall  be  construed  as  though  they  were  written  out in full
according  to  applicable  laws  or  regulations:

TEN COM -- as tenants in common          UNIF GIFT MIN ACT-- as Custodian under
                                         Uniform Gifts to Minors Act

TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties  JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right
                                         of survivorship and not as tenants in
                                         common

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.


For Value Received, ___________________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto:

                         ______________________________
                         ______________________________
                         ______________________________


 (Please print or typewrite name and address, including zip code, of assignee.)


Please  insert  social  security  or  other  identifying  number  of  assignee
________________________________


Dated:  ________________________

NOTICE:  THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION
OR  ENLARGEMENT  OR  ANY


<PAGE>


  CHANGE  WHATEVER.


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         300,766
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  199,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,546,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,151,731
<PP&E>                                         1,045,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                 835,481
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,427,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          789,045
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       50,353
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,501,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,427,133
<SALES>                                        1,280,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,280,252
<CGS>                                          438,514
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  438,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,280,771
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (427,183)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (427,183)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (427,183)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.09)



</TABLE>
260 La. 1063

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Walter BURNETTE.

Nos. 52119, 52120.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 29, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Walter Burnette was convicted in the Twenty-Second Judicial District Court for the Parish of St. Tammany upon a plea of guilty to the charge of simple burglary (No. 52119) and upon a plea of guilty of aggravated battery on the charge of attempted murder (No. 52120). Both pleas were entered in March of 1968. He filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus on each of the charges in the trial court. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied the applications but granted motions for *appeal*to this court.

There is no appeal from a denial of a writ of habeas corpus. C.Cr.P. art. 369. The trial court erroneously granted the motions for appeal. Since the entire record is before us, having been lodged in this court, we will treat what is before us as applications for remedial writs of habeas corpus. La.Const. Art. VII, Sec. 10.

The appeals are dismissed. The applications for writs are denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction. Petitioner has filed two “MOTION[S] FOR JAIL TIME.” His contentions were not properly raised before the trial court nor before us. Whatever rights petitioner has in relation to these contentions are reserved to him.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.9A


                          AMENDMENTS TO FURON COMPANY
                           1995 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
                           EFFECTIVE AUGUST 25, 1998

1.  Section 1.2 of the 1995 Plan is amended by adding the following paragraph
    (f) thereto:

    "(f) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6.6 regarding the term of
    this Plan, all authority of the Board and the Committee with respect to
    Awards hereunder, including (subject to share limits) the authority to amend
    outstanding Awards, shall continue after the term of this Plan, so long as
    any Award remains outstanding. The Committee shall have the authority to
    grant Awards which allow, and amend Awards to allow, a deferred payment in
    respect of such Awards under any deferred compensation plan of the Company,
    consistent with Section 1.5(b). Any such settlement or deferral shall not be
    deemed a new award hereunder so long as all shares issuable under this Plan
    in respect thereof do not exceed the aggregate number of shares subject to
    the Awards so paid thereby. The authority of the Committee shall continue in
    respect of any deferral so authorized."

2.  The existing text at Section 1.5 of the 1995 Plan is redesignated as Section
    1.5(a).

3.  Section 1.5 of the 1995 Plan is amended by adding the following paragraph
    (b) thereto:

    "(b) The Committee may allow the delayed payment or delivery of any cash or
    shares of Common Stock which may become due under this Plan. Without
    limiting the generality of the foregoing, the deferral of any cash payable
    in respect of an Award may be in the form of a credit to the Participant's
    deferral account under the Furon Company Deferred Compensation Plan and the
    deferral of any shares of Common Stock distributable upon the exercise of a
    Nonqualified Stock Option may be in the form of deferred shares under the
    Furon Company Option Gain Deferral Program (the 'Program'). In the event
    that the purchase price of a Nonqualified Stock Option is paid in full in
    shares of Common Stock and the delivery of shares of Common Stock in excess
    of the option price is deferred under the Program, Deferred Shares may be
    credited in respect of such excess shares and earn dividend equivalents or
    other compensation in respect thereof, and the number of shares of Common
    Stock issued under this Plan in respect of such Deferred Shares shall be
    charged against the share limits hereof. Dividend equivalents may be settled
    under this Plan or other authority of the Board and, to the extent settled
    under this Plan, shall be charged against the share limits hereof."
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>      5 
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
          FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT MARCH 31, 1998, THE
          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, THE CONSOLIDATED
          STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW AND THE RELATED NOTES FOR THE THREE
          MONTH PERIOD THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
          BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         12,138
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20,405
<PP&E>                                            900
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 32,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,467
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           63
<OTHER-SE>                                     28,912
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   32,442
<SALES>                                         3,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,387
<CGS>                                             425
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,055
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    50
<INCOME-TAX>                                       15
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                35
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (2,645)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,610)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.41)

         

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Ben Harper, Senior Vice President-Finance andSecretary/Treasurer of Friedman Industries, Incorporated, aTexas corporation, certify that:
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Friedman Industries, Incorporated;
     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, result of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

b) [intentionally omitted per SEC release 33-8238]

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     The registrant's other certifying officers(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 14, 2003 /s/  BEN HARPER Senior Vice President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer
PUBLIC 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

RagingWire Data Centers, Inc. ) Docket No. 9386 

a corporation, ) 

) 

Respondent. ) 

ORDER DESIGNATING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

Pursuant to authority vested in the Federal Trade Commission and delegated to 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

IT IS ORDERED that D. Michael Chappell, Chief Administrative Law Judge, be, 

and hereby is, designated and appointed to take testimony and receive evidence in this 

proceeding and to perfotm all other duties authorized by law. 

ORDERED: 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

D. Michael C {ppell 

Date: November 7, 2019
Exhibit 99.1


June 1, 2011

Analyst Contact:
Andrew Ziola918-588-7163Media Contact:
Megan Lewis918-561-5325


ONEOK and ONEOK Partners to Participate in


Citi Power and Gas




TULSA, Okla. –June 1, 2011 – ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) and ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will participate in the Citi Power and Gas Conference in Boston, Mass., on Thursday, June 2, 2011.




Robert F. Martinovich, senior vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer of ONEOK and ONEOK Partners, will be conducting a series of one-on-one meetings with members of the investment community.




The materials utilized at the conference will be accessible on the ONEOK and ONEOK Partners websites, www.oneok.com, www.oneokpartners.com, that morning, beginning at 7 a.m. Central Daylight Time.







ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) is a diversified energy company. We are the general partner and own 42.8 percent of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS), one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, which is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation's premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. ONEOK is among the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, serving more than 2 million customers in Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas. Our energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S. ONEOK is a FORTUNE 500 company and is included in Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500 Stock Index.




ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy company, which owns 42.8 percent of the overall partnership interest. ONEOK is one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S.




For more information, visit the websites at www.oneok.comor www.oneokpartners.com.




For the latest news about ONEOK and ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKNews and @ONEOKPartners




###
#### In the Interest of J. R. H., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1506.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 5, 1973.

*315Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Mark King Leban, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Peter F. LaPorte, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Linda C. Hertz, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The minor appellant was found by the trial court to be a delinquent child. The finding was based entirely upon a confession given to police after the minor was taken into custody and interrogated, and upon evidence discovered as a result of the confession. The State failed to prove that the minor was warned of his constitutional rights. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The law applicable to a criminal proceeding has been declared to be applicable to juvenile proceedings where loss of liberty may result from the adjudication. See In re D., Fla.App.1971, 245 So.2d 273.

The State has confessed error in this regard. Our independent examination of the record confirms the error and the fact that there is insufficient evidence to-support the finding of delinquency absent the tainted evidence. We therefore reverse and direct the discharge of the appellant.

Reversed.