Shaw Report on:

Performed by: /\•Air An.alysis>

Inc. Project Number:

416 November 1, 2, and 3, 2006

/!:Air Analysis•

Inc. 3904Clarks Creek Road Plainfield•

Indiana • 46168 317.837.8514 877.683 .TEST3904 Clarks Creek Road Plainfield.

Indiana 46168 Tel. 317 837-8514

Fax, 317 837-8518

Air Analysis,

Inc. represents

that the information

provided

in this report is true and accurate.

We at Air Analysis, Inc. strive to remain true to our mission• that the people involved are people of integrity, the data accurate, and the reporting

timely. Sincerely, •

Michael M. Di•n• President Air Ailalysis,

Inc.

Date:

STACK TESTING AND ENVIRONMENTAL

SERVICESTABLE OF (.ON7

EN] S EX, EC[VI{IVE

SUMf•ARg

(Page 2) Test Su•rmmry,

TaNe 1 Visible Emissions,

Table R•sm• s (Page 3) Paniculate Matter

(PM) Emissions,

Table 2 & 3 Particulate Matter

_<.. 10 m•cron

(PMI. 0) Emissions,

Table 2 & 3 Hydrogen Chloride

(HCl)Emissions,

Table 2 & 3 Hydrogen Flouride

(HF) Emissions,

TaNe 2 & 3 Sulfur Dioxide

(SO2) Emissions,

Table 2 & 3 Nitrogen Oxides

(NOx) Emissions,

TaNe 2 & 3 DESCRIPTION OF P ROCESSES

AND FIELD

NOTES

(Page 4) ]•ETHODOLOG¥ (Page 5) Stm•mary of Sampling

Procedures Description of Sampling

Methods APPEND]{X SAMPLE

CALCULATIONS FIELD DATA

IPRINTOUTS FIELD DATA LABORATORY

DATA. CHAIN OF CUSTODY CALIBRATION DATA VISIBLE EMISSIONS

DATA SUBMITTED PROTOCOL PRODUCTION DATA IIIIllIVVVIVIIVIIIIXPrqject Nt.m)ber:

A EXECUTIV_.. E SUMMAR,=•Y Air Analysis,

Inc. was contracted

by General

Shale Brick to perform

air emissions sampling of Kiln #20 and Kiln #32 during

brick manufacturing

production

in Mooresville, Indiana,

on November

1, 2, and 3, 2006. The objective

of the test program was to determine

compliance

with Indiana air permit requirements

and MACT standards. Sampling was performed

for Particulate

Matter (PM), Particulate

Matter < 10 microns (PM10), Sulfur Dioxide

(SO2),

Nitrogen

Oxides ('NOx), Hydrogen

Chlori-de

(HC1) and Hydrogen Flouride

(I-IF) emissions.

Visible

emissions

also coincided

during particulate sampling. The following

personnel

were involved

with the testing program: Air Analysis Air Analysis Air Analysis IDEM General Shale Michael

Dicen Susan Thorsell Ron Stapert Dave Harrison Warren Paschal The testing program

was performed

utilizing

US EPA Methods

1-5, 6C, 7E, 9, 26A, and 202: One test run was performed

on Kiln 20 on November

1, 2006, which was not included with the average

of Kiln 20; three more test runs were performed

on November 2, 2006 on that same kiln. Three sets of one hour test runs were performed

on Kiln 32 on November 3, 2006. TEST SUMMARY Table 1

Source

Kihl 20

Kiln32

Mass

Mass

Hydrogen

Hydrogen Time Emissions

Emissions

Chloride

Flouride (PM/PMIO)
12:30- 17:31

9:11-15:36 (PM/PM10) 0.7913 lbs/hrSulJkttes corrected (PM/PM10) 0.7403 lbs/hr Sulfates corrected

(PM) 0.3256 lbs/hr
(PM) 0.4861 lbs/hr

(HCI) 2.158 lbs/hr
(HCI) 0.0196 lbs/hr

(I-IF) 0.0057 lbs/hr

0.0006 lbs/hr

Sulfur Dioxide (lbs/hr) (so2)18.1lbs/hr
(so2)47.5lbs/hr
0 % Opacity

was read during all runs on Kiln #20 and Kiln #32 Run 1, Kiln 20 not averaged

due to different

production

and scrubber

parameters.

Nitrogen Oxides (lbs/hr) (NOx)10.1lbshtr
(NOx)7.6lbs/hr

2Table 2

GasTsB•xo02C02
QaQs•d

EcE{me} E(me) 1

2

3

4

Avg Stack Temperan•re 22•.6

2.•9.4 Moisture (volume %)

_• 4.82

•• Carbon Dioxide (dry volmne

2.5

2

2.2

2.5

2.6 %)
Actual CondO{ions

(aclim Standard Condflmns

{dscfln}
Emission RaW, (gr/dscl) PM EnRssion Rale. 0bs/hr} PM PM•MI 0, (•bsau') En•ssion Ra•e, 0bsam HCI Emission Rale, {l•/hr) HF Emission Rate, 0•s/hr} SO2 Emission Rate, (ibs/hr) Nox

42,685, .2 31,313.9
0.0000 0.0000 0.5165 0.0032 0.0034 58.16.7 32,183.2
0.0002 0.3228 1.2737 0.0032 0.0043 22.310.3

43,651.,0 31,891,7 0,0012 0.3312 0.6697 5.5110 0,0069 15.010.3

44°273.7 31,985.4
0.0012 0.3228 0.4304 0.9604 0.0057 17.19.9

0.0008 @3256 0.7913 2:158' 0.0{•} 18:.110. TEST CONDITIONS 'FaMe 3

BY•o02(7)02Qa 32 Stack Tempera•me Moisture (volume %) Oxygen (dry vohmm %) Carbon Dioxide tdry volume %) 248.74.731 ̧8
•8,891

224 7.,, 4.6818
33,668.6

3246.13,99 ̧1.7
34,261.2

A•g2'-17.3.17.71,6 Qstd Standard Conditions

(dscfin)

28,158 EcE(me) E{me) Emission Rate, (gr/dscf) PM Emission Rate, (lbs/hr) I'M P/v•PMI0, Emission Rate, {lbs/hr) HCI Emission Rate,. {lbs/hr) HF Emission Rate. {lbs/hr} SO2 Emission Rate, llbs&a)iNOx

0.0023 0.4729 0,5297 0,043 t 0.0005 -I.5,97..I 24,436,5 0.0023 0.4742 0.5753 0.0027 0,0007 48.37,8

00024 0,5112 1.1159 0.0129 0.0C•06 48.58.0

25:894 0.0023 0 4861 07403 O, 0 ! 96 0OOO6 47.57.6Two (2) brick manufacturing

lines, identified

as EU-002,

coD.sistit•g

of the following: O•e (D b•'ict; mam•factur#•g,

line, ide•¢#.fied

as L#•e, 1, #•staYed

i#• 1970, m.•)d•ied

it• .1979, ]oca•ed a¢ Plcm• No. 20, ccmsis¢it[g

of CheofOllOw#N: One (1) tunnel preod•yer

and one (1) tunnel dryer using waste heat from Line 1 Kil•a, arid one (1) coal and nmural gas-fired

kiln, idemified

as Line Kiln, equipped with a dLy lime/sodium

bicarbonate

injection

baghouse,

identified

as D.IFF-0I, exhausting

to Stack DIFF.-01,

rated at 25 million British thermal units per ho•r, capacity:

14.8 tons of bricks per hour. Pursuant

to 40 CFR 63, Subpart JJJJJ, this is an existing

affected

source u.sing an emissions

control system to comply with the rule. One (1) mill room, idemified

as EU•P20oMR,

equipped

with a baghouse, identified as CD-P20-MR,

capacity:

65 tons per hour. ()t•e (l) brick, mam(actur#•g

line, identified

as Line 2, installed

in 1987, located at Pkuqi NO. 32, equil¥)ed

with consisd•tg

of the following: One (1) tunnel pre-dryer

and one (1) tunnel d•3,er using waste heat from Line 2 Kiln, and one (1) coal and natural gas-fired

kiln,• identified

as Line 2 Kiln, equipped with a dry lime injection

baghouse,

identified

as DIFF-02,

exhausting

to Stack D1FF-02,

rated at 25 million British thermal units per hour, capacity:

13.7 tons of bricks per hour. Pursuant

to 40 CFR 63, Subpart JJJJJ, this is an existing affected source using an emissions

control system to comply with the rule. (B) One (1) mill room, identified

as EU-P32-MR,

equipped

with a baghouse, identified as CI)-P32q•,[I•,

capacity:

70 tons per hour.
Actual recorded

production

material

infbrmation

is in Appendix.

4The samplb•g pr6•,ed•.res

used by Air Analysing; b•c. are as fi•llows: Method "Sampling

of Velocity

Traverses

for Stationary

Sources" Method 2 "Determining

of Stack Gas Velocity

and Volumetric

Flow Rate" Method 3 "Gas Analysis

fbr the Determi•mtion

of Molecular

Weight" Method 4 "Determination

of Moisture

Content

in Stack Gas" Method 5 "Determining

of Particulate

Emissiona" Method 6C "Determination

of Sulthr Dioxide" Method 7E "Determination

of Nitrogen

Oxides" Method 9 "Visual Determination

of the Opacity

Emissions" Method 202 "Determination

of Condensible

Emissions

from Stationary

Sources" SAIFIPLE POINT

DETERI•ItNATION•EPA N[ETHOD

1 Sampling poir•t locations

were determined

according

to EPA Ret•rence

Method

1. Sa•p•g Points Location, s Dhne•s•ons Ports

Poh•ts Per Port

Tota• Points Kiln 20

45" I.D.

2

10

20 Kiln 32

42" I.D.

2

10

20 • • .Exact measure pomts and distances to disturbances

are listed m Appendix- EieM Data VELOCITY AND VOLU1FIETNIC

FLOW RATE

EPA IVIETHOD

2 EPA Method 2 was used to determine

the gas velocity

and flow rate at the stack. Figure 4-2 includes the component•

of the EPA Method

2 sampling

apparatus.

Each set of velocity determinations included

the measurement

of gas velocity pressure

and gas temperature

at each of the Method 1 determined

traverse points. The velocity pressures

were measures

with a T•]3e S pitot tube.. Gas temperature

measurements

made with a Type K thermocouple

and digital pyrometer.
GAS CON[POSFI'ION

AND I•OLECULAIR

WE1GtIT

EPA N[E'FHOD

3 In order to de'ermine

the oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations,

a sample of gas was obtained a•d ,analyzed

in accordance

with EPA Method 3. The gas smnple was collected

using a Fyritz mmlyzcr.

The results were used to determine

gas molecular

weight. NIOISTURE CONTENT-

EPA NiETHOII)

4 The flue gas moisture

content at the testing locations

was determined

in accordance

with EPA Meth.od 4. Figure 4•2 includes

the Method 4 sampling

components.

The gas moisture

was determined by quantitatively

condensing

moisture

in the chilled impingers

and silica absorptio.•. •l-]•e amount of moisture

condensed

was determined

gra:vimetrically.

A dry gas meter was used to measure the volume of gas sampled.

Moisture

content is used to determine

stack gas velocity.PANTICULATE DETERMINATION- E PA METHOD

W202 Stack gas is •hdra•

isokin•tically

and pa•iculat•

matter is collected

o•_ •h• nozzle, pmb• and fiber. The probe temperature

•d filter are maink•ined

at •mp•atures

of 248 degrees F 04- 25 deg. F). The impinger

temperature

and exit gas is mah•tah•ed

at temperatures

at or below 68 degrees F. The nozzle, probe and glass filter containers

are rinsed with acetone and the rinse is captmvd m a gealed glass confiner. (Method 202 or•y)'I'he

impmgers

and connecting

glassware

are rinsed twice with de-ionized water and captured

in a sealed container.

Two rinses of methylene

chloride

are captured

and stored in a sealed glass container SO2 DETERMINATION EPA METHOD

6C Stack gas is withdrawn

fi•om the stack turd conditioned

(moisture

is removed)

before being analyzed by infrared detection.

Sulfur Dioxide molecules

are "excited"

by specific wave lengths. Molecular" excitement

is directly proportional

to the concentration

of SO2. Quality assurance

of the analyzer

is firs• determined

by direct injection

of known EPA protocol

1 gas concentrations. A system check of the probe, connection

lines and conditioner

is also determined

prior to and after" each sample period to determine

drift: bias.
NO• DETERMINATION-. EPA METHOD

7E SLack gas is withdrawn

fiorn the stack and conditioned

(moisture

is removed)

betbre being analyzed by chemiluminescent

detection.

NOx molecules

are "excited"

by specific wave lengths. Molecnlar excitement

is directly proportional

to the concentration

of NOx. Quality assurance

of the analyzer

is first determined

by direct injection

of known EPA protocol

1 gas concentrations. A system check of the probe• connection

lines and conditioner

is also determined

prior to and after each sample period to determine

drift bias. OPACITY EPA METHOD

9 Stack opacity readings are taken for 60 minutes at 15 second intervals for NSI•_ and 30 minutes at 15 inter'vals

for state permitted,

non-federal

sources, by a certified visible emissions

reader. The visible emissions

reading are conducted

during each of the particulate

test runs. The results are reported as an average opacity reading for the half an hour period. A copy of the visible reader"s current certification

is included

in the Appendix. HYDROGEN HALIDE

DETERt•cHN•T•ON- EPA METHOD

26A Stack gas is withdrawn

isokinetically

and halides are collected

on the nozzle, probe and filter, snltimc acid and sodium hydroxide.

The probe temperature

and filter are maintafired

at temperatures of 248 degrees F. HCL is collected

in 0.1 N H2SO4.

Chlorine

is collected

in 0.1 N NaOH. The impinger

tetnperature

and exit gas is maintained

at temperatures

at or below 68 degrees F. The irnpmgers

and connecting

glassware

are rinsed twice with de-ionized

water and captured

in a sealed corrtainer.

6APPENDIX I AAMPLE

(_A• UL• TION,•Figure 5--1. Metals & Particulate

Sampling TrainAir Analysis,

Inc.

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS The tables presenting the results are generated electronically

from raw data. R may not bo poss•lc to exactly duplicate these results using a calculator. The reference method data, re•aalts and all calculations

are carried to sixleen decimal place• flwoughout.

The final table is formatted to an appropriate number ofslgnificant

figures. 1. Volume of water collected

(wscf') V,,a=(O.O4707X V•)
Where:
0.04707

total volume of liquid collected

ha impingers

and silica gel (ml) volume of water collected

at standard conditions

(fir) conversion factor (fP/ml)
Volume of gas metered, standard

conditions

(dscf)
17.64X V•XPt,,•-• AH X't V,•,a. 13.6 a (460 T,,,)
Where: Pb•o

17.64 13.6460

barometric

pressure (in Hg) average dry gas meter temperature

(°F) volume of gas sample through dry gas meter at meter conditions

(ft 3) volume of gas sample through dry gas meter at standard conditions

(ft 3) gas meter correction

factor (dimensionless) average pressure drop across meter box orifice (in HzO) conversion factor (°R/in Hg) conversion factor (in HzO/in Hg) °F to °R conversion

constant Sample gas pressure (in Hg)Pz •', =P•,o+( •-•.6 Where: Pbar•P•P•13.6

barometric

pressure (in Hg) sample gas static pressure (in HaO) absolute sample gas pressure

(in HaO) conversion factor (in H20/in Hg)A Air Analysis,

Inc.

4. Actual vapor pressure (in Hg)

Where: Pv

vapor pressure,

actual (in Hg) absolute sample gas pressure (in Hg)
Moisture Content (%) V•utd V•s¢ d Where: proportion

of water vapor in the gas stream by volume volume of gas sample through the dry gas meter at standard conditions volume of water collected at standard conditions

(ft 3) Saturated moisture content (%)

• :(•'•)
Where:

proportion

of water vapor in gas stream by volume at saturated

conditions

(%) vapor pressure,

actual (in Hg) absolute sample gas pressure (in Hg)
7. Molecular

weight of dry gas stream (lb/lb-mole) (C02) (02) •,., (CO+N2) (•0o) w(100)

(I00)
Where: MdMcozMCO.+N2 CO•O•CO + N• !00

dry molecular

weight of sample gas (Ib/lb-mole) molecular weight of carbon dioxide (lb/lb-mole) molecular weight of oxygen (Ib/lb-mole) molecular weight of carbon monoxide

and nitrogen (lb/lb-mole) proportion of carbon dioxide in the gas stream by volume (%) proportion of oxygen in the gas stream by volume (%) proportion of carbon monoxide

and nitrogen in gas stream by volume (%) conversion factor, %Air Analysis,

Inc.

Molecular weight of sample gas (lb/lb-mole)

MdB•M•_•oMs dry molecular

weight of sample gas (lb/lb-mole) proportion of water vapor in the gas stream by volume molecular weight of water (lb/lb-mole) molecular weight of sample gas, wet basis (lb/lb-mole) 9. Velocity of sample gas (tUsec)
•: (K•)(cmxv/•X

I
KpCpMsPsVs460 velocity pressure coefficient

(dimensionless) pitot tube constant molecular weight of sample gas, wet basis (lb/Ib-mole) absolute sample gas pressure (in. Hg) average sample gas temperature

(°F) average sample gas velocity (tUsec) °F to °R conversion

factor 10. Total flow of sample gas (acfrn) Q,,:(60XA,X
Where: AsVs60

cross section area of sampling

location (ft 2) volumetric flow rate at actual conditions

(acfi'n) sample gas velocity (Wsec) conversion factor, seconds to minutesAir Analysis,

Inc.

I. Total flow ofsample

gas (dscfrn)
Q,,•. (QoXP•X 17.64X -B,,,,) (t,'460)

Where: BwoPsQaQstd17.64 460

proportion

of water vapor in the gas stream by volume absolute sample gas pressure (in. Hg) volumetric flow rate at actual conditions

(acftn) volumetric flow rate at standard conditions

(dscfm) average sample gas temperature

(°F) conversion factor, (°R/in.Hg) °F to °R conversion

factor

12. Total flow of sample gas (dscfla) Q,,,uh, [.(Q,,)(P,X 17.64X -B,o!](60) (t.,÷460)

Where: BwoQstcl/hr t•17.64 460

proportion

of water vapor in the gas stream by volume absolute sample gas pressure (in. Hg) volumetric flow rate at actual conditions

(acfrn) volumetric flow rate at standard conditions

(dsclinx60) average sample gas temperature

(°F) conversion factor, (¢°R/in.Hg) °F to °R conversion

factorAir Analysis,

Inc.

13. Percent Isokinetic

(%)
(PsX z,X (O•)2(r0 Xox1 (144X4) Where: BwoPsT,VmstdVs0.09450

diameter of nozzle, inches proportion of water vapor hat he gas stream by volume percent ofisokinetic

sampling

(%) absolute sample gas pressure (ha. Hg) average sample gas temperature

(°R) volume of gas sample through the dry gas meter at standard conditions

(if3) average sample gas velocity (ff/sec) total sample time, minutes constant 14. Pollutant

concentration

(gr/dscf) Cs•,,•q." (I 5.43Xmn)

Where: Cgr/d•fWrr•td15.43

measured

concentration

in gas stream, gr/dscf pollutant collected,

corrected

for reagent blank, grams volume of gas sample through the dry gas meter at standard conditions

(ft 3) conversion factor, grams to grains
15. Pollutant

Emissions,

Mass Emissions

Rate lbs/hr

E •,•,, (lagrtctX 2"2046e 9 X Q ,,aX 60

Where: E Ib•hr /ag pollutant Qs•dVstd2.2046e-9 60

Mass emissions

rate, pounds per hour micrograms of pollutant

emissions volumetric flow rate at standard conditions,

dry basis (dscfi-n) Volume Standard

conditions conversion factor, pounds per microgram conversion factor, minutes per hourAir Analysis,

Inc.

16. Dio×in/Furan

Emission

Rate, ib/ton (Compliance

Determination)

ECQ•td/hr K• Mass emissions

rate, pounds per ton grain concentration

of pollutant emissions volumetric flow rate at standard conditions,

dry basis (dscfh) conversion factor, 1 lld7000 grains production rate tons per hour

17. DioxinfFuran

Emission

Rate, lag/Mg (Compliance

Determination) (E•.,,XO.4536X 09 (0.907)

E •E0.4536 1090.907

Mass emissions

rate, microgram

per megagram Mass emissions

rate, pounds per ton conversion factor, kilograms

per pound conversion factor, micrograms

per kilogram conversion factor, tons per megagramPPMVD TO LB/HR CO R I .NO• ppm NO,

lbs NO, 8•3755 x 106

dscf

OR ppm NO• lbs NO,

dscf 60rain

lbs NO, dscf mhn

kr

hr

.x 1.194 x 10i'• = lbs/NO• dscf

SOs ppm SO.

Ibs SO 6.01S1 X 104

dscf

OR

ppm SO• x 1.660 x 10 "• = .lbs SO dscf 60 min dscf rnln

hr

lbs SO2

CO ppm CO

Ibs CO 1.3762 x 107

dscf lbsCO dscf. 60rain

lbsCO dscf rnin

hr

hr CH4 ppm CH• (1 Bws) 2,4017 × 10 Ibs CH• dscf 60 dscf re_in

hr lbs CH• dscfIbs CH,

C•H• ppm c•H, (I Bws) 8,7573 x 106 lbs dscf lbsC,H, dscf 60 rain lbs dscf min

hrAPPENDIX II FIELD DATA PRINTOUTSSOURCE TESTED: COMPANY NAME: DATE OF TEST:

0.0032 0°0034 191.5000 58.0837 30•6200 6.6700

0.0032 0.0043 71.1700 22.255•- 45.7000 10.2635

5.51/0 0.0069 48,3100 14.9455 43.8100 10.2635

0,9604 0.0057 54.9600 17.1212 44.2700 9.9044

1.6t95 0.0051

Stac• Volo Fl•ow Rate AOF'MDSCFM __• 43,077.9131,230.5t

t 42'578"17

• 42'409"29

] 43'077"9•---[ 42'785"8231,350.17 31,014.41 "•1•

31,206.40 Stack Gas Ve]oc•,_•_ 65.006

64.252

63.997

65°006

64.565
Rt of Della P

1.0002

0.9928

0.9882

1.0002

0.9949 ISOK|NET•C TESTING Allowable isokinetic

90-110% Moisture of Stack Gas

99.19 •J 96.49

]• 99.02

][ 99.19 •[ 98,47 57.348 56.002

56.851

57.348

56.887SOURCE

TESTED: •i•hi 20 DATE OF I'E•tT:

i;0 0• RUN NO.:
•ol•ular WeJ•h• of •ack Ga•, DW BaSi•,
Md •.092 V•std) 2.789 Volume of D]•" Ga• Coltec• • STD. COND., TIn(F) •%275 • 54.614 Pb(inct•s Hg)

j• •ffa H

2.843 Vn•st(I) •,822
8wo 4.91% 1-8v,• •.09%
Ms 28.55 Ar• of S•ack (enter diam•er it= inch.), •e•h4n •ameter No, of St•acks •a.)

11.•465234 Static P•e•sure, P• •tic

•0 Ps 29.97 •ack Gas Velocity, Vs, fps •(•a p)

0972 Ts 228.• Vs 62.604 Stack Gas Flowrate, Qs, acfm A.• 11.04465234 Qs 41486 Stack Gae Flowrate •.. STD, COND, D• Bsei•, Qetd. Osld (dscf/m)

30407.26 Ostd (dsc•/t•r)

1824435.44 Velocity at the Nozzle, Vn 13•a. of Noz/Je Time of Run Vn

59.86 % leokinetic, %t %1

95.61 % leoMri•ie r•asured from inteimediate values %I 95.98 Pollutant Etass B'nJeMon Rate, PMR, Mtl (g)

000043 0[))04! PMR (tb/hr)

0.0032 0.0034 PMR (Ib•AMBIM)

0.0001 0.0000 Graln• I•r acf 9rtacf

0.0000 Grains par dscf gddscf

0.0000 mg/d•.;cf 0.0099 NOx (Ppm)

30.62 NOx (•/hr)

6.669955593 SO2 (Pgm)

191.5 SO2 (Ibktr)

58.08372032 0.000341

0.0099

DATASOURCE

TESTED: DATE OF TEST: RUN NO.: POLLUTANT: I•lolecul•r •Y•J_qht of •t•cR e•% Dr• •a•i•, •(I %CO2 %02 MdVolg•n• o• W•le• V•por ColJ•c•e• @ STD. CQND., Vwv Vw(•td) Volunm o• b• Tn•F)

49.425 Vm 55.871 Pb(i•s Hg)

30 d• H

2.•4 V•std) •.O02
BWO 3.27% %Bw0
Ms 28.64 D•in
NO. of Slacks AS(L.%N)

0 As(•a.) 11 04465234 •tatic Pressure, PS

•.07 •ack Gas Velocity, V•,
TS 239.6• Vs •.252 •ack Gas Flowrafe, •, AS 11.04485234 Qs 42578 •tack Gas Flowr•lte @ STD. CONDo, Dry I•}sis, Q•¢d. Ostd. 31350.17 Qstd ('dscf•t•')

1881010 18 Velocity at the Nozzla, Vn Tu'ne at" Run Vn

52.00 %lsokinatic, %1 %1

96.49 %E•okinetic n•uredfromintemmdiate

vulues %1 96.86 Pollulant (•ass Emission Rale, Pf•R, Ibs./hr. Mrs(g) 0000;3 PMR (•ofnr)=

0.0032

0.0043 PMR (IbfMMBtu)

0.0001

0.0000 Grains per act gr/acf

0.0000 Grains per d•c• grKJsct

0.0000 per n',g/d scf m•d$ct

0.0093 NOx (p•n)

45.7 NOx (ibh•r)

10.26352638 SO2 (ppm)

71.17 SO2 (•'r¢)

22.25590505

An(nozz•) 0000341

0.0093 FELD DATALOCATION: SOURCE

TESTED: DATE OF TE•T: RUN NO.: POLLUTANT:

}•CL•
%C02 %02 Md 29 Vol• of •ater Vapor Colt•#e• %•(•d) 2.0• Voluma of D•y Ga• Collected • 8TD. COND., V•d) T•n(F) 47.550 Vm 56.515 •i•es Hg)

30 •la N

2.922 •mma v•s•d) •.851

ewe 3. 'I-B• •.51%
MS 28.62 Area of •tack (enler diameter Width-in No. of As(L"IN) A.• d•a.)

i,044552 Sla#c iO 403i Ps 30.OY Slack Gae Vel•lly, V•, fps Cpsq•'(detta p)

0.986 Ts 242.800 Vs 63.997 Stack GaB FIow•ate, Q s, ecfm As 11.044652 Qs 42409 •tack Gas Flew•ate @ STD. CONB., DP/Basis, Qstd, Qstd. 31014.41 Velocity at the Notzle, L•a. of Nozzle T•me of Ru• Vn

63.37 % •okinetic,%l %1

99.02 % leekineticrm•surod

fromintotmediato

valu• %1 99.40 Polhdaot I•a•=s Emiesion Rat% P•IR, Ib•.lhr. Mn(g) 0764 PMR ([O,%-)

5.5110 0.0069 PMR (tJ•,,tMBIu)

0.15519 0,• HCI HF Graln• •r •[acf

0,01• G•h•8 p•r dscf •t 0.0207 •ins per r•dsc[ m•dscf 16,187011 N• (•)

43.81 NOx (•J•)

9.73•9 SO2 (ppm)

48.31 802 (•lr)

14.•5

0.000341

16,18701 FIELD DATASOURCE

TESTED: DATE OF TE•T: RUN NO,:
Moleculm- Weight of •ack Gas, O• Ba•i•, •d %C02 %02 Md 29
•(std) 2.601 Volume M D• Gas Collected @ •TD. CO•D., TII•F) 47.600 Vm 57.002
• •ffa H

3.011 Vtn(sld) 57.•8
Bwo 4.•%

Ms 28.52 Area of Stack (enter dian•ter in inches), •o'•-.in NO. of Stacks As(L"W)

0 As(die.) 11.04465234

Ps 30.07 Stack Ga• Veloci(y, V•, fps

Ts 242.700 Vs 65.0• Stack Gas Fllowrate, Q•, acfm As 11.04465234 Qs 43078 Stack Gas F owrate @ •'rD- COND D•' 8•sio, Qsld. Qstd (dscUm)

31230.51 Qstd (dscf/hr)

1873830.79 Velocity al tile Nozzlo, Vr• [•. of NOZZ• Time of R•

(0 Vn
%1 99.19 % •okiaetic mea8u=•ed frmll intermediate value8 %1 99.57 Polh.ttant •ass I•|•ion Rate, P•R• Ibs.thr.

0.0027 gr/dscf 0.003• Grain• I•r mg/dscf mDklscf

2.8268 NO× (ppm)

44.27 NOx (Ib/br)

9.904422335 802 (Pimp)

.54.96 802 (lb,•-..r)

17.12120172

'12

/k'•(nozzle 0.000341 FIELD DATASOURCE TESTED: COMPANY NAME: DATE OF TEST:

•• VoiL F•ow Rate ACFIVl DSCFM A_v•_Sta0k 0,0002 0.3228 0.0144 0.'3372

o•

•L o.oo;2 0.3312 •. 0.3228 •,(}• [[ 0.1076 0.4,304 I 42 8 -°9I 43650.9

44273.69 I. •'•'•

••

31891.72

•[

43617.94 31840.4'1
64.419 66,183

65.870

66.810

65,820fJ Stack Gas Ve•oci•_ _Av••Head • R•t of Deffa P

0.9999 JL 1.0221

1,0148

1,0272

1.016-•

Allowable isokinetic

90-110% % Moisture of Stack Gas

98.2•

99.18 L 97.09 [[ 99.61

98°52 4-87•/_1.] 3.64%

3-50%

•

4.16% 56.915 J_ 5.• L 5•l

•-• •]"

58.077•hl) 912 TIn(F) 55.075

Vm(s•d)

Q'•d (d•cr/m)

3130137 Qstd (dscf•h 0

18780B2.24

0.600341CO.•PANY

NA•E: •URC• T•TED: DATE OF RUN NO.: POLLUTANT:

•/• •.
%CO2 %02 MdVolum• of Water Vapor Co}lecte• @ 8TD. COND., V• V• 4 •,•std) 2.230 Vok]}•8 of D• Gas Collected @ STD. CON[)., Vm(st•) TnXF) 45.525 V•n 58.172
• H

3.137 V•std) 59.•2 Bois•ure Co•t•t of •ack G•s, Bwo 8we 3.64% 1-BWO •.•%

•s 28.60 Area of Slack (enter dian•ter Wldl[•-irl No. of Stacks As(L°W) •(•a.)

11.•,t65234 Static Pre•su•, Ps StaSc Ps

•.07 •ack Gas Velocity, Vs, fps Cp

8.1 s•(•la p)

1.022 Ts 239.350 Vs •.183 •ack Ga• Flow•ate, Q•, As 11.0•465234 Qs 4385B Stack Gas Flowr•te @ STD. COND., D=• Basle, Qstd. Ostd (dscfhn)

32183.20 •ld (•cf•r)

19•92.29 Velocity at tim Nozzle, Vn T• of Run Vn

•5.• %} 99.18 % •okinetic =wa•u• from intemlediate valoes %1 99.56 Pollutant Mass Emission Rate, PMR, Ibs./hr. Mn (9)

09(,:• PMR (•')

0.0432 Fih•le Coczdem'ible Groins l•r eel •/ac[

0.•01 Gralm• •r d•cf •/dsc[

0.•2

An(r-,ozz•e) 0000341

0.0576 0.0012 FELD DATA

IK- Factor
0.9s5 1.000 3.000 1.000 1,049 1.04£ 1.04£ 1.04!1.049 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.049 1.049.O•9 1.049 0.990 3.300 3.300 •__ ":•:--•=.-T3.00._ 0_,._•_•:,._•_

___4•;•_ 3.0•3 :, ••---7;•- ,•-• 3.300 245
• 3.300 •
5:,0 7::•-••' .•-•;.--44RUN

NO.: POLLUTANT:
%CO2 Md

29 Volume •(std) 2.079 Tm(F) 45.4•0 Vm 56,426 P•inches Hg) delta H

3.•0 Vm(s•d) 57.3• •oi•u• Co•ent of •{• G•, BWo

Ms 28.61 Area of S¢•c•

Stack Gas Velocity, Vs, tpe sqr(deHa p)

1.015 TS 243.400 Vs 65.870 Stack Gas Flowr•e, AS 11.04465 QS 43651 St•k G• FIowE•¢ • STD. COND., Dly Basis, Qstd. Qs,•d (d•c•tn'l)

31891.72 Qstd (dsc•/hr) Vel•l• a{ the No•le, Vn D•. o• Nozzle Time of Run Vn

63.95 % I•lnetlc, %l %1 97.09
%l 97.46 PolhRant M•ss Emlsston R•e, PMR, Ibs.lhr. Mn (g)

n•.15 (,o:r= 0.•54 PMR (Ib/hr)

0.•12 0.0•2 0.3974 PMR (I•MMBtu)

0.•grl 0.• 0.•91 •e/•c[ gr/dsc• 0.0012

An(nozzle) 0.O00341 FIELD DATASOURCE

TESTED: DATE OF TE•GT: RUN f'-]O.:

%CO2 %02Md

29 Volume of Water Vapor Collecl•d @ •T•. COND., V• •(•Ad) 2.869 Voh•mo ef "r•F)

43.950 Vm 57.877 •e H

3.170 •std)

Bwo 4.64% 1-• 95.•% •olacular Weigbl of 8tack Gas, M• Ms 28.49

V•dih-in diame•.er No. of Stacks As(L%•V)

0 •da•) 11.044•234

Ps 30.07 •ack Gas Velocity, Vs, fps •((k•t• p)

1.027 Ts 242.•0 Vs 66.810 Stack Gaa Flowrate, Q•, acfm A.s 11.04465234 Qs 44274 Stack Gaa Flow•ale •,. STD COND., De•' Basis, Q•td. Qstd (dscffm)

31985.35 Qstd (dsci?}t¢)

1919121.01 Velocity at the Nozzle, Vn Ti• • R•I Vn

•.55 % •kinetic, %1 %i

9•.61

0.000341

%1 99.99 Poliulan! Maas Emission Rata, PMR, |b•.thr. PMR (•#•)

0.3228 0.1076 0.4304 PMR (•MMBtu)

0.•88 0.•0 0.0088 Graias •ar ecf •l•cf

0.• •cf 0.0012 RELD

1.000 1.095 '1095 1.049O00 0.990
(X301 1.000 ---TT•I 1.049 -f• .•0SOURCE TESTED: COMPANY NAME: DATE OF TEST:

0.0431 so2.••_ SO2 (Ibs/h r• R• 2 0.0027 -IF (Ibs/hr) 0.0005

0.0007 215.a800 223.2700 N_.•Ox ppm 45.8660

48.3195 NOx (Ibsfhr) 46.6000

49.9100 7.1203 7.7573

0.012£ 0.0006

0.0006 224.0£00 220.9800 48.4713 51,10007.9381-- 0.0/96
47.5523 49.2033 7.8052 Avg. Stack VoL Flow Rate DSCFM

21,329.17

21,696.21

21,684.74

21,570.04 Stack Gas Ve•ocil.•_• 51.290

52.15O

52.137

51.859 •_Rt of Della P

0.7879

0.8036

0.8028

0.7981 ISOKINET|C TESTING

SUMMARY %|sokiaet•cs: Allowable isokinetic

90-110% % Moistureof_

Stack Gas S•ample Volume 97.94

]98.23

•

97.48 44.395•__..[ 45.292

44.366

44.685RUN

•'•O.:

%C02

Vw(sid)

2.545 Vo•u•n• of Dry T•F)

65.625

V•d) 44.395

• W• Depth-in
A•L'W) As(alia.)

9,621"119375 Static Presst•re, Ps Ps

30.41 •ack Gas Ve)oc•y, Vs, •s Cps•(•la p)

0.788 Ts 247.• Vs 51,•0

As 9.6211 9376 Qs 29600 •tack Gas Flow•e @ 8TD. COND., Day •,a'•,•, Q•d (•cf/m)

21329,17 Q•d (•)

1279750.21 Veloc•y at the Nozz•, Vn Dis. of No•le Vtl

•.23

% •k• measured Nora intermedl•o V•L•S %1 •.32 Mn(g) PMR (1•-¢)

0.0431 PMR (•bR'•MBiu)

0.0024 •/acf 0.0•2

• p•r •/•c•

0.•2 •dscf 0.1886 N• (•n)

46.6 NOx (•0

7,120334•8 802 (ppm)

215.• 802 (•)

45.•71

An(nozzle): 0.000341

0.1888 FIELD DATA

0.80£ 0.81£ 0:80,5 0.7t% 0,787 0,775 0,775 0.775 7LOCATK•N: SOURCE

TESTED: DATE OF TEST: RUN NO.: POLLUTANT: Molec•da• Weight of •lack Ga• D• Ba•i•, •(I %CO2 %02 {., Md 29.04 •(•d) 2,63• Volu• of D• Gas Coll•i•q TIn(F)

73.825 Vm 46.941
gam• 9• Vm(std) 45.•2 Moi•ure Content of Stack Ga• Bwo •vo 5.49% 1-Bwo •.51%
Ms 28.43 Area of •tack (enter diameter in inches),

No. o• •cks •(L•) As(•a.)

91621119375 •atic P•ura, Ps Ps

30.41 •ack Gas Vel•ffy, Ms, f• Cp

84 •(• P)

0.• Ts 246,2• VS 52.150 Stack GaB Flowrate, Qs. acIm As 9.621119375 Qs 30104 Stack GaB Flowrate @ STD. COND., Dry Basis, Qstd, Qstd. 21696.21 Qstd (dsc&1"•')

1301772.42 Velocity at the Nozzle, Vn Die. of Nozzle

2q Time of Rul

•r•, Vn 51.23 % Isokinetic, %!

9•.23 % Isokinetic measured fre.m intermediate values %1 98.61 Pollutant Mass Emission Rate, PNR, Ibs,/hr, Mn (g)

000042:

0000 ]0 PMR (•r)=

0.0027

0.0007 PMR (Ib/NMBtu)=

0.0001

0.0000 HCI HP Grains per ecf 9/act

0.0000 Graln• per dr=cf gr/dscf

0,0000 Grains p•r mgldsc• mg/dscf

0.0"i16 NOx (Pt•n)

49.91 NO× (•bff•r)

7.757323309 SO2 (,ppn"

223.27 SO2 (•o•r)

48.31951717

Ar•nozz•) 0.000341

0.0116 FIELD DATALOCATION: SOURCE

TESTED: DATE OF TEST: RUN NO.: POLLUTANT: Molecular Weight of Slack %CO2 %O• Md 29 Vw(std) 2.582 Vol• of D W Ga• Coll•ct• • •TD. CO•D, V•td) ]'•F) 75.875 •(inc•s Hg) •l•a H

1.935

•i•ure Co•e•t of Slack Ga• Bwo -Bwo 94.50% Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, Ms 28.39 Area of Stack (•nter di•metor in inches), AI• Depth-in Wid•-in d•ameter NO. of Stacks As(L'W)

0 As(•a.) 9.6211194 Slatic Pressur• Pa PsStack Gas Velocity, Vs, fpa Cp •4 scF(d•ta p)

0.803 Ts 246 300 Vs 52.137 Stack Gas Flowrate, Q•, acfrn As 9.6211194 De 30097 Stack Gas Flowrate @ STD. COND., Dry Basl% Qstd. Qstd, 21684.74 Qs• (dsci?nr)

1301084.39 Velocity at the No•le, Vn Dia. of Nozzle

2:. Ti•e of RUn

(,(.! Vn 50.19 % |sol;inetic,•4 %1

96.27 % •okineticmeasure•

fro•inlem•diate

valuaa %l 96.64 Pollutant Mass EmiGsio•,1 Rate, PMR, Ibs./hr. Mn (g)

00O 199! 9f;L 0:, PMR (ll•')

0.0129 0.0006 PMR (Ib/MMBtu)

0.•052 0.•00 HCL HF Grains •r acf •/acf

0.(•1 Graim• p• decf •t•

0.0001 •ins • m•c• e•cf 0.•5396 NOx (•m)

51.1 NOx (Ibf•')

7.9380828 SO2 (R•) SO2 (•#•)

4&471•47

An(nozz•): 0.000341

0.05554 FIELD DATASOURCE TESTED:

£ii:,• 5• COMPANY NAME: (•ene•at DATE OF TEST:

!/03/06 Filterable (gr/dscf) 0.0023 Filterable (Ibs/hO 0.4729 Condensible (l__b_s/hr) 0.0568 Filterable + Condensible

(•bs/h Avgo Stack VoL Flow Rate ACFM DSCFM A_vg. Stack Temp. Stack Gas Velocity Avg. Velocity Head _Av•.Sq.•Rt of Delta P

0.5297 •[ 3392•

33715.•7•

•

34015.35 24371.63 •"•4--

1 24630.2•[

24428.78
58.772 0.8132 0.9018 247.250 t 246.100_-]

• 5•.4o6 •]

•.9•48 o.8o91 0.8209 •_.• 0.9167 1 0.9060 ISOKINETlC TESTING

SUMMARY %lsok•netics: Allowable isokinetic

90-110% % Moisture

of Stack Gas _Samo•le•V_ olume 98.71 ] 98.45 I 99-84

99.00 5.48£ 5.40%]

6.1•

5.670/0 5•.3• [ 50.-7•0•

5•• ] 51.399•URCE

TE•TEO: Kd• 3P DATE OF TEST: RUH •0,:

%C02 %02 Md

28.88 VolumB ol Wa•er Valor Collected @ STD. COND,, Vwv •(std) 2.964 Volu•e of D• Gas C•lleded • B'[D. COND,, TIn(F) 57.925 •• 51.078 P•inches Hg)

3b •ta H

2.•1 Vn•sld) 51.126 •oi•ture Content of Stack Ga•, Bwo Bwo 5.48% 1-• 94.52% •oleculer W•igh• o• Stack Gas, Ms 2828

No. of St•cks As(L'W)

0 As(c•a.) 9.621119375 •tatic Pressure, Ps Ps

•.41 Stack Gas Vel•ity, Ve, fps •a p)

0.902 Ts 248.6• Vs •.772 •ack Gas Fl•wrate, Qs, acfm As 9.621119375 QS 33927 Stack Gas FIowrate @ STD. COHD., Dry Basi•= Qstd. Qstd (dscffm)

2437'1.63 Qstd (dsc•fnl)

146.2"297.99 Velocily at the Nozzla, Vn D•a. of Nozzle

',•L MS 58.0I % Isokinetic, %1 %1

9•J 7l % Jseklnetic measured frail intern•,•dlete values %i 99.09 Pollutant Mass Emission Rate, P•R, tbs./hr. PMR (•#•')=

0,4729 0,0568 6•ins per acf •/acf

0.•17 Grains •r dscf •/•cff

0.0023

An(nozzle): 0000341

0.0084 0.5297 0.0228 FIELO DATA

245
61011t21314151617192021222324Vv•s•d) 2.9C)2 Vek•m•, of D•y Gas C•c•ad @ STD. COND., Vr•s•d) TIn(F) 63.575

V•std) 50.809

MS 20.44

As 9.621119375 Qs 33716 8•acR G•s Flowt•o • •T•, COND., D• Basis, •ld. Q•d (d•f•l)

24284.44 Q•d (d•cf•)

1457•.48 Ve•c• • the •oz•, Vn

Ar,(noz•e) 0.000341 FIELD DATALOCATION: •j• .• 8OURCE "rE£TED: t•h ,? DATE OF TEST: •. RUN NO.: POLLUTANT: •lec•l•r Weight of St•k Ga•, Dry B•ls, F3d %CO2 %02 Md 29 Volume oi Wa•el' Vaper C•llecled VIc 7:5 •(s{d) 3.410 Volume o• D• Gas Collected @ STD. COND., TIn(F) •1.300 Vm 52. 845 P•inches H•)

:,) det• H

2.523 Vm(std) 52.•2 M• Cen•nt ef •{•{:k Gas, Bwo 6.13% 1-Bv• 93.87%

MsArea of St•k (enter diameter In Inches), A• Depth-in W•th-in diameter NO. of ,StaCks As(L"W)

0 As(dia.) 9.62111930 Static Pt•sure, 8•tic Ps

30.41 Stack Gas Vel•ll•, Vs, fps Cp o sqr(delta p)

0.917 Ts 246.100 Vs 59.597 St•k Gas Flowr•e, • 9.621119• Qs 3•03 8•k G•$ Fl•t• e STO. CONO., D• B•Is, Qstd.
• (d•/hr)

1477815.39 Vel•lty • the Nozzle, Vn D•. O• N%zzie Ti• • Run

60 Vn 59.•
%• 99.84
%1 1•.23

Mn (g)

00;? •C)A; 0.0082 PMR (l•h 0 0.5112 0.• 0.5112 PMR 0b/MMB•0

0.0181 0.0•0 0.0181 • •#erab[e Co•ler•ible Grains •r gr/act

0.•18 Groins per d• gr/d•f

0.•24

Al•(nozzle: 0.00034'1 FIELD DATA Col•ni•l Brick

2224APPENDIX IH FIELD DATAVELOCITY TRAVERSE

PO•NIT DETERMINATION (EPA Method

Tavers•,

Pc4nts o[• Diamete•: Stack Dia.(inches)? @

I•'J#er•sville

1.98

1.44

1.17

8°95 6.57 4.73

3.69

3,82 13.32 8.73

6.57 4•1 3.02 2 11.25 3 33.75 4 41.99 6789161112

31.68 ,38.43

14.54 30.47

10.17

7,97 15.39 I i °25 43.02 38.27

29.61

1 40.28 34.83

28,98 43.58 38.43 41.31

37.04 39.•9 41t.99 44.680VELOCITY TRAVERSE

POINT DETERMINATION (EPA Method 1)

Tavei-se Poin• or• Diameter: Stack Dia.(inches)?

Po•ats: 2.81 10.50 31.50 39.19
78101112

1.85

1.34

1.09

&88 6,13 4.41

3,44

2.81 12.43 8.15

6.13

4.94 29.57 13.57

9.49 35.87 28.43

14.36 40.15 33.85

27.64

14.95 37.59 32.51

27'.05 40.66 35.87

31 38.56 34°57 40.91 37.04 39.t9ZZVELOCll•f TPd:•VERSE

POINT DETERMINATION (EPA Method 1) i/0 3/[)(i

]'averse Points on Diamefer: Stack Dia.(inches)7 42t234

789101112 2.81 10.50 39.19

1.856.13

1•344.418.15

3.446.13

8.882o8t 29.57 13.57

9.49

7.43 35.87 28.43

14.36

10.58 40.15 33.85

27.64

t4o95 37.59 32.51

27.05 35.87 40.66 38.56 40.91

313&57 37.6• 39.19 41VELOCITY TRAVERSE

POIN'I" DETERIVltNA-['ION (EPA {•-lethod 1) Kiln 32 General Shale ]"averse Points on Stack,{ Dia.(inches)?

Points: •

8I

•I

•0[

12] 42234
7891011t2 2.81

1,85

1.34

.09 0.88

33.85 14.95 37.59 32.5t

27.65 40.66 35.87

31.50 38.56 34.57 40.91 37.64 3&19 41.12 40.15 10,50 6.13

4.41

3.44

2,81 31,50 12.&3

8.15

6.13

4.98 39.19 29.57

•"

9.49

7.43 35.87 28.43

10.50(IAIdd) enleA

0

0 0 0 0

I'•-

-ell
illC• (tudd) enleh0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (tudd) enleA O(.(3
COO

oE.o.E

0•0

E0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (todd) enleA

0 0 0 0

0(.0

0•0

E0 0 0 0 u• c• u• o 0 0 0 0 0 (uadd) anleA O0

0•00 0 0 0 (l•dd) anleA or•O

00• 0"30(l•dd) anitA OC•(I/•ldd) enleA 0Me hod 6c Typ9 Data Shee,

Tes•g Location On site Contact Gas Concentration

(Indicate Units)

Value [ero

Mid-Range

Hi;Ih-Range 0.25 percent of span. 50 to 8q percent of span. 80 to g0 percent of Calibration Error Span Cylinder Value

Analyze=" Celibratlofl Respons( Ab•01u•e,Oifference • •

• •
8ys•m Callbm•on Bias Zero gas Mid-range High.range gas
Init• Values

System Bias Zero D• zero ...%:z,•

•qq:- Difference (Percent spea) 2% of Sp•n

Final Values System Cal Respons• System Ca1 Bias

Calbratlon,Ddft 3%

Time ppm0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c:; o o c• • o o o o c• • (I/•dd) anleA Cq•D

(tudd) anleAN O•...

• •'T6• /0o,. -z.sz,

---T oRS•Value (ppm)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o h• o h• • h• •o h• o o • h• o o oValue (ppm)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • o o • h• • o o o • oValue (pprn)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o • o b o o b o bO0 Value (PPM)

•

O• (.n 0oo 0) o Va|ue (PPM)

o o o o • oValue (PPM)Air Anal }.•sis, P•o.ject Numbe•-:

,-ll6 APPENDIX IV LABORATORYDATAGeueral ,:>hale Brick Inc. Ploject N•lmber:

4 I(•
PM DETERMINATION FILTER Kiln 20Filter564

Run #

Pre-Weight

Post-Weight 1 0.3572

0•3572 568 2

0.3746

0.3752 569 3

0.3645

0.3681 575 0.3820 4

0.3863

0.0000 0.0006 0.0036 0.0043

Kiln 20 BeakerDE

G Acetone Beaker (50mls)

23

ACETONE

78.0754 80.1636 54.7909 56.3314 54.6487

Post-Weight 78.0754 80.1636 54.7918 56.3316 54,,6487 Net Gain 0,0000 0.0000 0.0009 0.0002 0.0000
Kiln 20

1

3 TOTAL Fi•er Net Gain 00.0006 0.0036 0.0043

Acetone

Net Gain 0

0.0009 0.0002

Totals00.0006 0.0045 0.0045

7(]eileral Shale Brick, COND•N$•L• D•T•INAT•ON

K•ln 20

L

N

Run #

2

562006 57.0849 66.0980 79.1680 (50•}l•ls H20)

5•.9340

Post=Weight 56.2071 57.0998 66=1044 79.1708 56.9340

Net Gain 0.0065 0.0149 0.0064 0.0028 0o0000
DI/SULFATE CALCULATIONS Kiln 20

L

N0 1 Net Gain 0.0065 0.0149 0,0064 0.0028

DI Inhouse
344349334354

DILab Volun•e 3O3O3O3O Total

374379364384 Net Gain (grams) 0.00707 0.01618 0.00697 0.00304 Suffate
0.00011 0.00011 0.00011 0.00010

Net minus Sulfate = Grams 0.00377 0.01288 0.00367 0,00004 .DI •et gain grams x (total nds/(total

mls aliquot)

•ulfate grains

c•rrecte{t

gah•Gerleral Shale Brick, Inc. Proiect ,qumb{:•

416
CONDENSIBLE DETEICdVIINATION

Kiln 20BeakerTUVW Blank ECeaker 2

4 {50m|s MeCI2)

Pre-Weight

Post•Weight 79.0548 66.8980

Net Gain 79.0581 66.8982 55.3797 55.5468 0.0033 0.0002 3 55.3788 0.0009 55,5453 0.0015 55.t 917

55.1917

0o0000

K•|n 20Run #12

H20 Net Gain 0.0038 0.013 3 0.0037 4 0.00004

TOTAL MeCI2 Net Gain

Totals 0.0033 0o0071 0.0002 0.0132 0.0009 0.0046 0.0015 0.0015(•eneral Shale Brick, h•c, )Pro.ject Ntm•ber:

410 PM DETERMIN

ATION FILTER Kiln 32Filter tD Pro-Weight

Post-Weight

Net Gain 571 t

0.3756

0.3823

0.0067 572 2

0.3706

0.3769

0,0063 573 3

0.3858

0.3926

0.0068 Run #

Kiln 32

H

12 J 3 Acetone Beaker (Semis) ACETONE Pro-Weight

Post-Weight 55.2776 55.2784 55.1293 55.1305 66.5137 66.5123 54.7889 54.7889

0.0008 0.0012 0.0014 0.0000

Kiln 32 Run #

3 TOTAL Fi•ter Net Gain 0.006'7 0.0063 0.0068

Acetone

Net Gain 0.0008 0.0012 0.0014

Totals 0.00'75 0.0075 0.0082

10.•,ue•al Shale Prqj oct N u tuber: CONDENSIBLE DETERMINATION

PQ 23

Pre-Weiight 63.8080 55.0508 79.7418 55.277•

Pest=Weight

Net Gain 83.8138 0.0058 55.0522 0.0014 79.7519 0.0101 58.2776 0.0000

D][/SULFATE CALCULATIONS Kiln 32

ID

0,0058

,.ho.se Vo|ume

456

DI Volume

456 0.00621

486 426 30 0.0014 375

30

405 0,00151 0.0101 0.01076 3O

S.lfate
0,0003 0.0001 0.0000

Net minus Su|fate = Grams -0.00369 0,00001 0.00968 DI •let gain grams x (total mls/(total

ntis aliquot)

sulfate grams

corrected

gain(.•:•{:/al Shale. Brick, I•c, Project Number:

416

CONDENSIBLE DETERi•INATION (Continued)

MeCl2 Kiln 32Beaker liD
×YZ

123 Blank Beaker

(5Orals MeCI2)

Pre'Weight 56.7672

Post-Weight 56.7681

Net Gain 0.0009 55.7528 80.1389 56o329t 55.7544 80.1389 56.3291

0.0016 0.0000 0,0000

TOTAL Kiln 32Run #

H20 Net Gain

MeCI2 Net Gain

Totals 123 00.00001 0.0097 0.0009 0.0009 0.0016 0.00161 0 0.0097

12Aaalys s 3904 Clarks

Creek Road Plainfield, IN 46168 General Shale

Clarks

Creek Analytical Report (1106-42)
EPA Me th o d 2 6A Hydrogen chloride Hydrogen fluoride HPL C Analysis Sulfate Enthalpy Analytical, inc. Phone: (919) 850 4392 / Fax: (919) 850 9012 www.enthalpy.com 2202 Ellis Road Durham, NC 27703 5518I

certify that to the best of my knowledge

all analytical

data presented

in this report: ® Have been checked for completeness ® Are accurate,

error-free,

and legible
® Have been conducted

in accordance

with approved

protocol,

and that all deviations

and analytical problems are summarized

in the appropriate

narrative(s) ® This analytical

report was prepared in Portable Document

Format (.PDF) and contains 150 pages.

QA Review Performed

by: Michael Steven SchapiraSummary of ResultsCompanylAir Analysis,

Inc. AnalystlKEH ParameterslEPA Method 26A # Samples•7

runs & 1 blank Client #lGeneral

Shale Job #11106-42 PO #lVerbal Report DateJl 1/27/2006 Compound Sample

ID / Catch W•) Hydrogen fluodde Hydrogen chloride

Kiln 32 Run 1 7.70 ND 678

Kiln 32 Run 2 10.5 J 42.6 ND Hydrogen fluodde Hydrogen chlodde

Kiln 20 Run • 45.9 J 43.3 ND

Kiln 20 Run 2 58.343.1 ND Hydrogen fluoride Hydrogen chloride

Kiln 20 Run 4 79.7 13,333

H2S04

Blank 4.26 ND 23.5 ND

Kiln 32 Run 3 9.98 ND 199 J Kiln 20 Run 3 95.6 76,370

1106-42 m26 Results 11/27/2006CompanylAir Analysis,

Inc. AnalystlKEH Parameters/HPLC Analysis # SamplesJ7

runs & 1 blank Client #lGeneral

Shale Job #11106-42 PO #lVerbal Report Datell 1/27/2006 Compound Sample

ID / Concentration

(ug/mL)
Sulfate Kiln 32 Run 1 331

Kiln 32 Run 2 47.5

Kiln 32 Run 3 35.5
Sulfate Kiln 20 Run 1 112

Kiln 20 Run 2 111

Kiln 20 Run 3 105
Sulfate Kiln 20 Run 4 98.6

Di H20 Blank 0.0622 ND

1113R-42 Sulfate Results 11/2712006ResultsNarrative SummaryEnthalpy Analytical

Narrative

Sun, mary •ysis, C|ie•a• #• General-Shale

Inc.

•06-42 Pzr•nae•er•,•

Eff•-Method

26A Custody
Analysis

Separation

Matrix Spikes

Blanks Reproducibility Reporting Notes

Edn Ortiz of Enthalpy

Analytical,

Inc. received

the samples

at ambient temperature

on 11/10/06

after being relinquished

by Air Analysis, Inc. Prior to analysis

the samples

were kept under lock with access only by authorized

personnel

of Enthalpy

Analytical, Inc.The samples were analyzed

according

to the procedures

outlined

in EPA Method 26A. The acid (H2SO4)

matrix samples were analyzed for the chloride

(Cr) and fluoride (F-) ion. Quantitation was performed

using a Hewlett

Packard

series 1100 High Performance

Liquid Chromatograph

equipped

with a Dionex ED40 Electrochemical

detector

and a Dionex ASRS-ULTRA® 4-mm autosuppressor. Separation was accomplished

by a Dionex IonPac AS-14A

4 mm x 250 mm column.

A copy of the analytical

method

(1006-38M)

is included. Before and after sample analysis,

calibration

curves were prepared and analyzed.

Fluoride

and chloride

eluted at approximate

ly 2.6 and 3.4 minutes respectively.

Both compounds

separated

well and were easily identified. A 0.500-mL

aliquot of sample Kiln 32 Run 1 was spiked with 0.663 pg of hydrogen

fluoride

(HF) using 25.0 •tL of a solution containing 26.5 •tg/mL I-IF. The spiked sample was analyzed

in the same manner

as the other samples.

The calculated

HI: spike recovery was 93.9%. A 0.500-mL

aliquot of 4.082-fold

diluted sample Kiln 32Run 1 was spiked with 1.29/ag of hydrogen

chloride

(HCI) using 25.0 p.L of a solution containing

51.4 •g/mL HC1. The spiked sample was analyzed in the same manner as the other samples.

The calculated HCI spike recovery

was 90.2%. One blank sample H2S04 Blank was analyzed

and reported.

No blank adjustments

were made to any of the reported

data. OKThe H•SO4 matrix samples

were analyzed

for Cr and F but are reported as HCl and HF. The peaks listed in the "Sample Chromatograms" section

are labeled

hydrogen

chloride.

The additional molecular

weight contribution

from the [•- is included

in the results listed on each chromatogram

and throughout

the report.Entha|py Analytical

Narrative

Summary C••y.• Air A•alysis,

Inc. L____..•J: Verbal Custody
Analysis Separation

Matrix Spike HPLC P•nalys•s

]
Erin Ortiz of Enthalpy

Analytical,

Inc. received

the samples

at ambient temperature

on 11/10/06

after being relinquished

by Air Analysis,

Inc. Prior to analysis

the samples

were kept under lock with access only by authorized

persormel

of Enthalpy Analytical,

Inc. The samples

were analyzed

for sulfate

using a Hewlett- Packard series 1100 High Performance

Liquid Chromatograph with a Dionex

ED40 conductivity

detector

and a Dionex ASRS suppressor. Separation was accomplished

by an Dionex

IonPac AS14 250 x 4.0 mm analytical

column

using 8.0 mM Na2CO3/1.0

mM NaHCO3 as the eluent at 1.2 mL per minute.

A copy of the analytical method

(0306-29.M)

is included. Before and after sample

analysis,

a calibration

curve was prepared and analyzed. Sulfate eluted at approximately

6.1 minutes,

separated

well, and was easily identified. A matrix spike was prepared

by spiking a 0.500-mL

aliquot of a 40-fold diluted sample Kiln 20 Run 1 with 1.25 •tg of sulfate (25.0 gL of a 50.0 •tg/mL solution).

The spiked samples

were analyzed in the same manner

as the other samples.

The calculated spike recovery

was 93.7%. Reproducibility OK Quality of Data

OK Reporting Notes

Aliquots

of each sample were received

instead

of the entire sample. Therefore

all the sulfate results have been presented

as concentration (gg/mL)

values instead of catch weights.General Reporting

Notes The following

are general reporting

notes that are applicable

to all Enthalpy

Analytical,

Inc. reports, unless specifically noted otherwise. The symbol MDL represents

the Minimum

Detection

Limit. Below this value the laboratory

cannot confina the presence of the analyte of interest reliably. The symbol LOQ represents

the Limit of Quantification.

Below this value the laboratory

cannot quantitate the analyte of interest within the criteria of the method. The symbol ND following

a value indicates a non-detect

or analytical

result below the MDL. The symbol J following

a value indicates an analytical

result between the MDL and the LOQ. A J flag indicates that the laboratory

can positively

identify the analyte of interest as present, but the value should be considered

an estimate. The symbol E following

a value indicates an analytical

result exceeding

100% of the highest calibration point. The symbol DF represents

a Dilution Factor. This number represents

dilutions during the extraction and/or laboratory

stages of sample treatment.

The analytical

result taken from a laboratory

instrument

is multiplied by the DF to get final results. The Sample ID MS represents

a Matrix Spike. An aliquot of an actual sample is spiked with a known amount of analyte so that a percent recovery

value can be determined.

This shows what effect the sample matrix may have on the target analyte, i.e. whether or not anything in the sample matrix prohibits analysis for the analyte(s). The Sample ID MSD represents

a Matrix Spike Duplicate.

Prepared

in the same manner as an MS, the use of duplicate

matrix spikes allows further confirmation

of laboratory

quality by showing

the consistency of results gained by performing

the same steps multiple times. Most methods performed

by Enthalpy do not require analysis of an MSD. The Sample ID BS represents

a Blind Spike. A member of the Quality Assurance

department

has created BS samples for many of the analytes Enthalpy tests for, and only QA and the Enthalpy Analytical ownership have access to the actual values of these samples.

The laboratory

analyzes

them without knowledge of the actual value, and the spreadsheets

get completed

for these samples solely by the QA group. The Sample ID LCS represents

a Laboratory

Control Sample. Whenever

spikes are prepared

for our clients more spikes are prepared

than needed. The extras (randomly

chosen) are kept in-house

at the appropriate temperature

conditions.

When the spike samples come back from the client for analysis, the LCSs (usually two are saved) are analyzed

to confLrm that the analyte could be recovered

from the media, separate from the spike samples which were used on the project and which may have had issues caused during collection

and/or transport. Significant Figures:

Where the reported value is much greater than unity (1.00) in the units expressed (specifically values of 1,000 or greater), the number is rounded to a whole number of units, rather than to 3 significant

figures. For example,

a value of 10,456.45

ug catch is rounded to 10,456 ug. There are five significant digits reported, but no confidence

should be placed on more than three significant

digits.Sample ChromatogramsData

File H:\LC2006Q4\GONZO\DATA\NOV\II06-47A\031-2101.D 1106-42 Sample Hame: Kiln 32 Run 1 Injection Date

11/20/2006

7:55:42

PM

Seq. Line

21 Sample Name

Kiln 32 Run 1 Location

Vial 31 Acq. Operator

KEH Inj

1 Acq. Instrument

Gonzo Inj Volume

25 •i Acq. Method

H:\LC2006Q4\GONZO\METHODS\I006_38.M Last changed

10/9/2006

11:51:11

AM by KAM Analysis Method

H:\LC2006Q4\GONZO\METHODS\II06-42S.M Last changed

11/21/2006

10:01:32

AM by KEH ADC1 B, Oionex ED 40 (H;•LC2006Q4•GONZ•ATAVqOV•l10•47A•031.210,I.D)

500

480

460-

420-

400

External

Standard

Report Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified

11/21/2006

10:01:27

AM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier

& Dilution

Factor with ISTDs Signal I: ADCl B, Dionex ED 40 RetTime Type [min] 2.642 3.474

Area

Amt/Area

Amount

Grp Name [uS*s] [ug/mL]

Hydrogen

Fluoride Hydrogen Chloride Totals 0.00000 Results obtained

with enhanced

integrator[ 1 Warnings

or Errors Warning Calibrated

compound(s)

not found

Gonzo Reprocess

11/21/2006

10:46:40

AM KEH Pag6 1 of 2",:Ah: A.nalysjs,

Inco Geuetal

Shale I:!hick, h•c. P•o, ject Numbe•:

4 16 APPENDIX V CHAIN OF CUSTODYSample CustodyJPrqiect Nmnbe•:

4(317) 837- 8514 • 837- 8518 FAX 3904 Clarks

Creek

Road Plainfield, Indiana

46168

PiTIOT TUBE CAUBRATION Reference: 40 CFR 60, Appendix

A, Method 2, Section 2.1 Project
Location Probe Number/ID

Six foot probe A

Date of Job Calibra'don Date

7105/06

External Tubing Diameter Base To Opening Plane Distance

(Pa). Base To Opening Plane Distance

(Pb),,

0.95 cm 1.2•5 cm 1.25 cm
PblDt Pa/DtAng'• a Angle 1.32cm 1.32cm 1 deg Allowable 1.05/1.5 1.05-1.5

c= and c= 2 < 10.0 Degrees 1 deg a 1 and (• 2 • 10.0 Degrees Angle I• 1 0 deg 13 1 and 13 2 • 5.0 Degrees Angle • 2 0 deg 13 1 and 13 2 • 5,0 Degrees

z (cm) 0.0 Z is less than 0.32cm
w (cm) 0.0 W is less than 0.08cm ICE 35•/ 34 0 Ambient 70 •/

If all cdteria are met, Pitot Coefficient is 0.84 Boiling hot/H2o

153 • •' 152 •'' J 71 Pitot Coefficient:

0.84

Signature017) 837- 8514 017)837- 8518 FAX 3904 Clarks

Creek

Road Plainfield, Indiana

46168

Project Client Location Probe Number/ID PITIOT TUBE CAUBRATION Reference: 40 CFR 60, Appendix

A, Method 2, Section 2.1

••robe -B

Date of Job Calibration Date

7/05/2006

Extemal Tubing Diameter Base To Opening Plane Distance

(Pa)___ Base To Opening Plane Distance

(Pb). 0.95 1.25. cm 1.25 cm Measured Pb/Dt 1.32cm Pa/DtAngleAngle a 2 Angle 13 1 Angle •1 2

z (inches)

w (Inches) Ice Mercury thermometer

F 33 •

32 Ambient

1.32crn 1 deg 1 deg 0 deg 0 deg 0.00.0If all criteria are met, Pitot Coefficient is 0.84 Boiling/Hot H2o 150 •

149

Allowable 1.05/1.5 1.05-1.5

o 1 and o 2 -< 10.0 Degrees

o 1 and o 2 < 10.0 Degrees 13 1 and J3 2 < 5.0 Degrees j3 1 and J3 2 <5.0 Degrees Z is less than 0.32cm W is less than 0.08cm Pitot Coefficient:

0.84
SignatureCertificate of Analysis:

EPA

Protocol

Gas Mixture SG9148819BAL Reference

Number:

54-124060809-15 3/29/2008 ASG Chicago-

IL Expiration Date: Laboratory: Cylinder Number: Cylinder' Pressure:

2000.6 PSIG Certification Date: 3/29/2006 Certified Concentrations

XIDE Concentration

Accuracy Alrga$ Specialty Gases 12722 Seulh Wenlw0dh Avenue Ch,cago. IL 60628 •W.mrgas.com

Analytical Principle

Procedure

• 499.9 PPM

+/- 1%

NDIR GI B a la nc,,,,,,,,=e Certification performed

in accordance

with "EPA Traceability

Protocol (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procedures

listed. Analytical Methodology

does not require correction

for analytical

interferences. Notes:

.•.•

,/,-'• Do not use cylinder below 150 psig.

Approval

Signature

,"•;. :4. Reference Standard

Information
NTRM 1050312 Analytical Results 1st Component

SULFUR

DIOXIDE 1st Analysis Date: 03/21/2006 R 997

S 501

Z 0 S 500

Z 0

R 997 Z 0

R 997

S 501 2nd Analysis Date: 03/29/2006 R 997

S 50O

Z 0 S 500

Z 0

R 997 Z 0

R 997

S 499 •

•

.Concentration SULFUR DIOXIDE

SG9150918BAL

996.6PPM

Conc 500.8 PPM Conc 499.8 PPM Conc 500.8 PPM AVG: 500,4 PPM Conc 499.8 PPM Conc 499.8 PPM Conc 498.8 PPM AVG: 499.4 PPMCertificate of Analysis: Cylinder Number:

CC138038 Cylinde• Pressure:

2000.6 PSIG Certification Date: 1/27/2006 Certified Concentrations Component SULFUR DIOXIDE NITROGEN EPA

Protocol

Gas Reference Number: Expiration Date: Laboratory:

54-124055420-6 1/27/2008 ASG Chicago-

IL Mixture

Concentration Accuracy

Analytical Principle 226.2 PPM

+# 1%

NDIR Balance Airgas Specialty Gases 12722 S0ulh Wenlworlh Avenue Chicago, IL 60628 www.a•rgas.c0m

Procedure G1 Certification performed

in accordance

with "EPA Traceability

Protocol (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procedures

listed. Analytical Methodology

does not require correction

for analytical

interferences. Notes: Do not use cylinder below 150 psig.

Approval

Signature Reference Standard

Information T__vp•e [•alance Ga__s Component NTRM 51213 SULFUR DIOXIDE Analytical Results 1st Component

SULFUR

DIOXIDE 1st Analysis Date: 01/20/2006 R 251.7

S 225,8

Z 0 S 226.2

Z 0

R 251.7 Z 0

R 251.7

S 225.7

•yI.Number SG9151214BAL

Conc 225,8 PPM Conc 226.2 PPM Conc 225.7 PPM AVG: 225,9 PPM 2nd Analysis Date: 01/27/2006 R 251.4

S 226.0

Z 0

Conc 226.3 PPM S 226.7

Z 0

R 251.8

Conc 226.6 PPM Z 0

R 251.8

S 227.2

Conc 227.1 PPM AVG: 226.6 PPM

Concentratiod• 251.7 PPMCertificate of Analysis: Cylinder Number: Cylindei" Pressure:

2000.6 PSIG Certification Date: 1/27/2006 Certified Concentrations

DE SC9164837BAL EPA

ProtocoJ

Gas Mi×tur -

Total oxides of nitrogen Reference

Number: Expiration Date: Laboratory:

54-124055422-18 1/27/2008 ASG Chicago

IL Airgas Specially Gases 2722 Soulh Wenlworth Avenue Chicago, IL 60628 w',•,•.airgas.com

Concentration Accuracy

Analytical Principle Procedure 252,3 PPM

+/- 1%

Chemiluminescence G1 Balance 252.4 PPM Certification performed

in accordance

with "EPA Traceability

Protocol (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procedures

listed. Analytical Methodology

does not require correction

for analytical

interferences. Notes: Do not use cylinder below 150 psig.

Approval

Signature Reference Standard

information T_y.p_£ Balance Ga.• • NTRM 60602

NITROGEN

NITRIC OXIDE Analytical Results 1st Component

NITRIC OXIDE 1st Analysis Date: 01/19/2006 R 259.7

S 255.0

Z .01 S 255.0

Z .05

R 260.0 Z 03

R 260,2

S 255.1

Conc 252.1 PPM Conc 252.1 PPM C0nc 252.2 PPM AVG: 252.1 PPM 2nd Analysis Date: 01/27/2006 R 259.4

S 254.7

Z .26

Conc 252.5 PPM S 254.8

Z .32

R 259.1

Conc 252.6 PPM Z .30

R 259.2

S 254.6

Conc 252.4 PPM AVG: 252.5 PPM•

Co 3centration CC208165 257.0 PPMEPA Protocol

Gas Mixture Certificate of Analysis: Cylinder Number:

SG9164042BAL Cylinder Pressure:

2000.6 PSIG Certification Date: 1/27/2006 Certified Concentrations 54-124055422-13 1/27/2008 ASG Chicago

IL Airgas Specialty Gases 12722 Soulh Wenlworlh Avenue Reference Number: Expiration Date: Laboratory: Chicago JL 60628 wvw•.awgas.com
Component Concentration

Accuracy

Analytical Principle Procedure NITRIC OXIDE 503.8 PPM

+/- 1%

Chemiluminescence G1 NITROGEN Balance Total oxides of nitrogen

504.0 PPM Certification performed

in accordance

with "EPA Traceability

Protocol (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procedures

listed, Analytical Methodology

does not require correction

for analytical

interferences. Notes: Do not use cylinder below 150 psig.

Approval

Signature Reference Standard

information Type •

,•omponeli•t NTRM 111203 NITRIC OXIDE Analytical Results 1st Component

NITRIC OXIDE 1st Analysis Date: 01/19/2006 R 989.5

S 502.0

Z -.72 S 501.5

Z -.64

R 987.5 Z -.86

R 988.1

S 500,8 2rid Analysis Date: 01/27/2006 R 985.0

S 501.1

Z -.55 S 502.2

Z -.62

R 984.4 Z -.55

R 985.7

S 501,7

SG9165227BAL

Conc 503.5 PPM Conc 503,0 PPM Conc 502,3 PPM AVG: 502.9 PPM
Conc 504.2 PPM Conc 505.3 PPM Conc 504.8 PPM AVG: 504.7 PPM

990.6 PPM(}e•e•al ,Shale B•ick. h•c. P•c!.i ect Numl)e•-:

416 APPENDE• VII VISIBLE

EMISSIONS

DATACARL KOONTZ

ASSOCIATES of Nashville, Tennessee .•.• This is to aCkno•,wledge

that successfully pa•icipated

in Visible Emissions training on

• and is qualified to evaluate Visible Emissions for a pedod of six (6) months from the date of certification.CITY

[qUIPMENT OE$CRIRe eMISSION POINT /•j_F#• • START STOP HelGHT AROVE GROUND LEVEL 013 TANCe FROM 08SERVER STOP EMIS31QN COLOR OPE'RA TING MODE

HEIGHT REC4,TIVe TO 08$ER VER / START STOP DIREC T/ON FROM 085ER VER

DESCRIBE BACKGROUND START 9ACKGROUND COLOR

X MAXIMUM

0

SUN LOCATION

LINE Emisslcn F•,inl

-•

Wind Observer's Pcsltlon Plume SunCITYPHONE PROC•,SS

EQ UIPM E•L•,,,, CONT•:•L EQUIPMENT DESCRIBE EMISSION PQINT START •l/1•'#,/4

0"•. STATE SOURCE ID NUMBER OPERATING MODE OPERATING MODE
STOP HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND LEVEL •- HEIGHT RELATIVE TO OBSERVE •BTART •' STOP ¢•O |START

•

R DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER

| DIRECTION

FROM OBSERVER •,• STOP •Z•__[•Ls

TART ,•_ • STOP DESCRIBE EMISSIONS START

STOP EMISSION COLOR S_]•ART•/..- STOP•-'•"

,•/• PLUME TYPE

CONTINUOUS•, FUGITIVE WATER DROPLETS

PRESEN•

IF WATER DROPLET PLUME NO•_• YES !•

_[ ATTACHED

7 DETACHED• POINT IN THE PLUME AT WHICH OPACITY WAS DETERMINED START STOP DECRIBE BACKGROUND '•:,

STOP COLOR •'•',•CONDITION• START I•-•'•. STOP •TART /0-• STOP /0 • S•Z•-•D

STOP AMBIENT TEMPE•TUR•

• •••

•PE•E• START • STOP •
SOURCELAYOUTSKETCH

Draw North Arrow TIME

STOP TIME

SUNWIND PLUME and STACK

=0

Emission Point

Sun Locator Line

COMN1ENTS AVERAGE OPACITY FOR HIGHEST PERIOD

O RANGE OF OPACITY READINGS

NUMBER OF READINGS ABOVE O %WERE O MINIMUM O

MAXIMUM

HAVE RECEIVED

A COPY OF THESE OPACITY OBSERVATIONS SIGNATURE TITLE DATE

OBS.•ERVER'S

NAME (PRINT) O•BSERVER'S S•I C•NAT 0 RE'• •DATE OR#ANI•TI• • ••L• • 5 •/• CERTIFIED EY

a • DAT• VERIFIED BY

• DATEsoURcE

NAME

CITY

STATE

ZIP SOURCE ID NUMBER PROCESS EQUIPM•N•

OPEP•TING

MODE CONTROL EQUIPMENT

OPERATING

MODE DESCRIBE-EMISSION POINT

• START ,• .:•/" J:::),/•) •TOP

• # #/• HEIGHT@VE GROUND LEVEL HEIGHT RELATIVE TO OBSERVER ,•-• •LSTOP.•

/ START

• ZSTOP G•t DISTANCE FROM •'•-

DIRECTION

FROM OBSERVER START •O StOP / •O START •# STOP• DESCRIBE EMISSIONS START •L •

STOP C ( E• EMISSION COLOR START •L•STOP•

• PLUME TYPE

CONTINUOUS• FUGITIVE :Z INTERMI•ENT WATER DROPLETS

PRESE•

IF WATER DROPLET PLUME NO • YES (::•

ATTACHED

:j DETACHED• POINt IN THE PLUME AT WHICH OPACITY WAS DETERMINED START •i•

StOP • • •

SOURCE LAYOUT SKETCH

SUN O WIND Draw North Arrow

Emission Point PLUME and STACK

=0

Sun Locator Line

COMMENTS

-•AVE RECEIVED

A COPY OF THESE OPACITY OBSERVATIONS .•IGNATURE TITLE DATE

20 0 • 0 (b so 0 0 0 0 21 O O o O 51 O O O O 22 O O O O 52 O O O O 23 •.)24025000(.3 26 0 0 O 0 54 Z'2_O

0 'O 5•0 0 0 0 56 00

•) O

2o 0 0 0 0 5• 0 0 0 0 0 O 0

o •v•,• o•c•rv •o•

NUMBER OF READINGS HIGHEST PERIOD

••

% WERE O RANGE OF OPACITY READINGS MINIMUM 0 MAXIMUM

• OB•RVER'S NAME (PRINT)

VERIFIED ¢

DATEWINO

SPEEO S•'An {" 0 STOP 0 AMSIE/V T TEMPERA TURE $0 URC E LA YOUT 3;KETCH .H. PERCFU•T

X

SUN LOCATION

LINE HIGHESTP=RI•n

0

C•' WEnE •
083•VER'S N•WE 8$•VER'SSIGNA•R5 .; )A•E ORG•I•TION A •L

/

Comments:EQUIPMENT

BACKGROUND

COLOR 'WfNO
AMBIENT TEMPE.•
SOURCE LA YG• SKETCH

STOP '• L • • SKY CONDITIONS,

•
WiND DIREC •N sro• •

ACRTH ,•ROW•

x

SUN LOCATION

LINE Emisslcn Pc, int

•

Wind Obse•e/'• PcsltJon Plume Sun START TIME

MAXh'vtUM • OBSERVER'S NAME (PRINT} C•SS.E.RVER'$ S/GNATURE

•1 • )A•E

C •RTE •

" Comments:•$CRIB

=- BACKGROUND 9ACKGROUNO COLO• • STOP WINO 3PEEO
AMBIENT $OURC• LA YO• SKETCH NUMBER OF READINGS
X

•" Emisslcn Point

•

Wind [] Obse•v'e£$ Pcsltlon Plume • Sun HIGHEST P=RIOD

(•

• WERE RANGE GF OPACITY READINGS MINIMUM :• O

M•IMUM

@ 083E•VER'S NAME (PR•T}

CommentS:General Shale Brict<, Inc. Pro, ject Number:

410 APPENDIX ,•UBMITTED

PROTOCOLAir Anal}•sis,

[•.•c•

APPENDIX IX PRODUCTION

DATAPlant

20 11/2/2006 Bricks/car Avg. Bdck Weight

Cars/day

Pounds

Brick/day

Tons Brick/hour 4 544

3.6

36.43

595,913

12.41 Plant 32 11/3/2006 Bricks/car Avg. B.dck Weight

Cars/day

Pounds

Brick/day

Tons Brick/hour 5,760 3.5

25.71

518,400

10.80 36.429

25.714/2:Zo