alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
20

Failsafes

400 ft

(120 m)

400 ft

(120 m)

Low Battery Failsafe

Environmental conditions, payload, and flying style can affect power 

consumption. Use the controller’s flight data display to monitor the 

voltage of the battery during flight.

If the battery reaches 14 V, the X8 lands automatically at the current 

position, indicated by a blinking yellow status LED and a quick 

repeating tone.

The X8 is programmed with a set of failsafe behaviors to prevent a crash in 

the event of a loss of one of the data or communication channels required for 

flight. Although certain failsafes have assigned LED indicators and tones, it is 

unlikely that you will be able to see these at a distance. Monitor the ground 

station for failsafe indications. If a failsafe is triggered, the assigned behavior 

activates. To override the failsafe behavior, use the controller to switch to 

standard mode and regain manual control. 

RC Controller Signal Failsafe

Physical obstructions and interference from nearby wireless signals can affect 

the X8’s connection with the controller. 

If the X8 loses contact with the controller, it returns to the launch point and lands 

automatically, indicated by a blinking yellow status LED.

EXHIBIT B - FAILSAFES
21

GPS Failsafe

The X8 requires GPS lock before takeoff. Enclosed areas, physical 

obstructions, and lack of available satellites can affect GPS strength. If 

the X8 loses GPS lock in flight, it triggers a GPS failsafe—indicated by 

a blinking blue and yellow LED with a high-high-high-low tone—and 

automatically switch to manual control (standard - altitude hold mode). 

Always be prepared to regain manual control at any time while flying and 

choose an unobstructed flying area to improve GPS signal strength. When 

flying a mission, we recommended changing the GPS failsafe behavior to 

land. (Visit 3DR.com/X8/info for more information about configuring the 

GPS failsafe.)

Altitude Failsafe

The X8 has a 100 m (328 ft) altitude geofence enabled by default. If the 

geofence is breached, the X8 automatically switches to RTL.

400 ft

(120 m)

manual 

control

100 m

(328 ft)

Range Failsafe

The X8 has a 300 m (984 ft) horizontal geofence enabled by 

default. If the X8 travels farther than 300 m from the launch point, 

it automatically returns to the launch point and lands. If you plan to 

fly a mission that exceeds this range, you will need to disable the 

horizontal geofence. (Visit 3DR.com/X8/info for instructions.) The 

range failsafe is disabled in the event of a GPS failsafe.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 976 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 976

 To disregard cost-of-living adjustments in tier 1 railroad retirement 
 benefits in determining eligibility for supplemental security income 
                        benefits under Medicaid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 1993

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To disregard cost-of-living adjustments in tier 1 railroad retirement 
 benefits in determining eligibility for supplemental security income 
                        benefits under Medicaid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENTS IN TIER 1 RAILROAD RETIREMENT 
              BENEFITS DISREGARDED IN DETERMINING ELIGIBLITY FOR 
              SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME BENEFITS UNDER MEDICAID.

    Section 503 of Public Law 94-566 (90 Stat. 2685) is amended by 
adding at the end thereof the following new sentence: ``The preceding 
provisions of this section shall be applied by treating references to 
monthly insurance benefits under title II of the Social Security Act as 
including references to tier 1 railroad retirement benefits (as defined 
in section 86(d)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986); except that 
in applying such treatment the 1st month beginning after the date of 
the enactment of this sentence shall be substituted for `June 1977' and 
`October 1990' shall be substituted for `April 1977'.''

                                 <all>
```
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 990

To provide that the Secretary of Commerce shall not set minimum or maximum amounts on grants made for the purpose of providing financial

assistance to States whose tourism promotion needs have increased due

to Hurricane Andrew, Hurricane Iniki, or other disasters.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 18, 1993

Mrs. MINK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To provide that the Secretary of Commerce shall not set

minimum or maximum amounts on grants made for the

purpose of providing financial assistance to States whose

tourism promotion needs have increased due to Hurricane Andrew, Hurricane Iniki, or other disasters.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary

4 of Commerce, acting pursuant to Public Law 102–368 to

5 provide grants to cover the costs of tourism promotion

6 needs arising from Hurricane Andrew, Hurricane Iniki, or

7 other disasters, shall not establish or enforce a maximum
2

•HR 990 IH

1 or a minimum dollar amount of assistance to be made

2 available to an individual or to a State.

Æ
|   | 1. | I      have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Apollo Gold Corporation;      and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      annual report; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Melvyn      Williams                                |
|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Melvyn      Williams                                    |
| Chief      Financial Officer and Senior Vice President- |
| Finance      and Corporate Development                  |

----
# United Stat es Court of Appeals For the First C ircuit

No. 02-1284 SOUTH SHORE HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A SOUTH SHORE HOSPITAL

TRANSITIONAL CARE CENTER, Petitioner, Appellee,

v.
TOMMY G. THOMPSON, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on October 16, 2002 is corrected as follows: 1. At the end of the paragraph on page 11, line 2, add new footnote 4.

4.After this opinion had gone to the printers,
a divided panel of the Fourth Circuit issued a contrary dec i sion on a case very similar to t his one. Md. Gen. Hosp., Inc. v. Thomp son , No. 01-2012, 20 02 W L 31254029 (4th Cir. Oct. 9, 2002) (rejecting Paragon and holding the Secretary's interpretation of 42 C.F.R. § 413.30(e)(2) to be inconsistent with what it deemed to be the regulation's unambiguous language). We have given that opinion careful consideration but find it unpersuasive.

2. Replace former footnote 5 (which will now be footnote 6), on page 16, with the following:

6.The Hospital and the Secretary have called to our attention through successive postarg ument letters, see Fed. R. App. P. 28(j ) ; 1st Cir. R. 28(j), the Board's recent decisions in four other cases, including MercyMed. SNF v. Mut. of Omaha Ins. Co. , No. 97- 0135, 2002 WL 1906219 (PRRB Aug. 7, 2002). In these matters, the Board, relying in large p art on the district court's opinion in this case, rejected the Secretary's interpretation of the new provider exemption. See , e.g. , id. at *17. However, the Secretary, exercising his discretion under 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(1), subsequently granted reconsideration and reversed the Board's determination in Mercy Med. See Mercy Med. SNF v. Mut. of Omaha Ins. Co. , No. 2002-D31 (CMS Admin. Oct. 8, 2002) (citing Paragon , 251 F.3d at 1150-51, with approval). We presume that the Secretary will
reverse the other three Board decisions in due
course. Consequently, we cede deference to the Secretary's determination, not the Board's, as the definitive statement of the agency's position. See 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(1); see also Anaheim Mem'l Hosp. v. Shalala , 130 F.3d 845, 850-51 (9th Cir. 1997).

3. Change the numbers of all the succeeding footnotes accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000040656
<NAME>                        General Semiconductor, Inc.


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         3,789
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  74,788
<ALLOWANCES>                                   765
<INVENTORY>                                    48,764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               152,486
<PP&E>                                         233,098
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 589,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          88,327
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       377
<OTHER-SE>                                     176,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   589,762
<SALES>                                        373,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               373,809
<CGS>                                          258,624
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  309,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               25
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,644
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                49,790
<INCOME-TAX>                                   14,190
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            35,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   35,600
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.82



</TABLE>
```

           FORM OF ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

MBNA AMERICA BANK, N.A.

MBNA MASTER CREDIT CARD TRUST II

         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of MBNA America Bank, N.A. (the
"Bank"), as Servicer pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 4, 1994
(the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") by and between the Bank and The Bank of New York,
as trustee, (the "Trustee") does hereby certify that:

         1.  The Bank is Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

         2.  The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trustee.

         3.  This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.05 of the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement.

         4.  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the twelve-month period ended June 30,
2001 was conducted under my supervision.

         5.  Based on such review, the Servicer has, to my knowledge, fully performed all its
obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout such twelve-month period
and no material default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing
except as set forth in paragraph 6 below.

         6.  The following is a description of each material default in the performance of the
Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement known to the
undersigned to have been made during such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each
such default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the
current status of each such default:

"None"

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 15th day
of August 2001.

                                                                                                                                                Name:    Douglas O. Hart
                                                                                                                                                Title:      Senior Executive Vice President
```
EXHIBIT 31.4



CERTIFICATION



I, Brandon H. LaVerne, certify that:



1.       I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PCM, Inc.; and



2.       Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report.



|Date: May 1, 2017 | /s/ Brandon H. LaVerne 
|----------------- | -----------------------
|                  | Brandon H. LaVerne     
|                  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winthrop Realty Trust (the Company) for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas C. Staples, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By:   | /s/ Thomas C. Staples   | 
|----- | ----------------------- | 
|      |                         | 
|Name: | Thomas C. Staples       | 
|      | Chief Financial Officer | 

August 9, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 994 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 994

 To direct the Secretary of the Army to conduct a review of the report 
   of the Chief of Engineers on Staten Island from Fort Wadsworth to 
             Arthur Kill, New York, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 18, 1993

 Ms. Molinari introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Army to conduct a review of the report 
   of the Chief of Engineers on Staten Island from Fort Wadsworth to 
             Arthur Kill, New York, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVIEW AND STUDIES.

    The Secretary of the Army shall review the report of the Chief of 
Engineers on the Staten Island Coast from Fort Wadsworth to Arthur 
Kill, New York, published as House Document Number 181, Eighty-ninth 
Congress, and other pertinent reports for Staten Island, in response to 
the major storm damages of the Northeaster of December 11-13, 1992. The 
purpose of the review shall be to determine whether modifications of 
the recommendations contained in such report are advisable at the 
present time. In addition, the Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive 
study of the shore of Staten Island, and at the earliest time possible, 
investigations for the severely impacted communities of New Dorp Beach, 
Oakwood Beach, and Annadale Beach to analyze the vulnerability of these 
coastal areas and the causes for the ongoing erosion, including those 
processes which have been accelerated by the storm impacts.

SEC. 2. REPORT.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of the Army shall transmit to the Committee on Public 
Works and Transportation of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on the 
results of the review, study, and investigations conducted under 
section 1.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Berthel Growth & Income Trust I (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
J. Berthel, Chief Executive Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company Planning, Inc.,
the Trust Advisor of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


March 29, 2004                      /s/  Thomas J. Berthel
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                         Thomas J. Berthel
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         Berthel Fisher & Company Planning, Inc.
                                         Trust Advisor
                                         Berthel Growth & Income Trust I
#### Vernon KELLY and George Ferber, Appellants, v. E. L. THOMPSON and Wesley C. Paxson, Appellees.

No. L-342.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 30, 1970.

*713Frank X. Friedmann, Jr., of Rogers, Towers, Bailey, Jones & Gay, and Martin Sack, Jr., Jacksonville, for appellants.

Evans & Stewart, Jacksonville, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Data Analysis: Enhancing the Impact of Performance Audits 

(8 hours) 

Course Overview 

The increasing availability and usability of large data sets provides significant opportunities to 

help auditors more effectively assess agency performance, compliance, or detect fraud. To 

gain the greatest benefit from the data, however, auditors must properly understand how to 

think through what data they want to collect, how they will collect it, assess its reliability, and

communicate the results of their analysis. This introductory class focuses on helping auditors 

better plan and manage their audits for using data and expands awareness of potential data

sources and analysis methods (e.g., tabulations, combining data sets, statistical modeling, and 

geo-spatial analysis) that have been used by other audit agencies. It also provides examples of 

how results can be graphically displayed in reports. Note: It does not address how to conduct 

these types of data analysis. If delivered virtually, this course is offered over 2 half days.

CPEs: 8 

Who Should Attend 

Both new as well as seasoned auditors in team leader or team member roles will gain 

knowledge and new perspectives on how data can be used to achieve high returns on 

investment. 

Course Objectives 

Participants will be better able to

• Appreciate the range of data sets that auditors can utilize.

• Recognize the role that data can play in successfully planning, conducting, and 

reporting on high-impact audits 

• Determine the resources necessary to conduct the analysis

• Understand key steps for testing and analyzing data

Course Topics 

Overview of Data Analysis 

• Benefits of using data in audits 

• Challenges of using data in audits 

• Designing audits that rely on data for findings, conclusions, and recommendations

• Presenting key findings that are based on data analysis

Design Considerations 

• How to integrate data analysis into the audit design 
• Advantages and concerns with using data 

• Options for descriptive and advanced analyses 

• Four-step process for conducting data analytics 

Data Reliability and Sufficiency 

• Overview of data reliability assessment process 

• Key elements of data reliability and testing 

• Documenting data reliability assessments 

Implementation, Documentation, and Reporting 

• Importance of a data analysis plan 

• Types of analyses 

• Common analysis issues and problems 

• Interpreting data to report results 

• Importance and types of visuals/graphics to gain greater understanding of results 

Case Studies 

• Examples of how selected audit agencies have used data analysis in audits
#### Harmon Lee GILLIS, Appellant, v. PAUL W. DAVIS, INC. OF LAKELAND, a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-1003.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 3, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
OFFICE OF THE AlTORN,EY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

OROVER SELLERS 

Al-rOFINar GlNERIL 

Iionorable Marion L’oCes 

County Auditor 

Hags county 

8011 B?arce8, Texas 

,, ~, 

Section 40 of &tfoLe XVI of the Ckw1utlt~8ion Of Sara8 profide8, ln'part, aS follO~8: 

=Wo perme &all hold or exercise et the 88me 

time, more than one'&rfL orflos of emol-t. . . .*