alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Form 10-KSB of Olympic Entertainment Group, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory A.
McAndrews, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





                                            /s/  Gregory A. McAndrews
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Gregory A. McAndrws,
May 2, 2003                                      Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          22,551
<SECURITIES>                                    32,573
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,823
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,584
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,531
<PP&E>                                       1,516,364
<DEPRECIATION>                                 583,954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,027,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,505
<BONDS>                                        335,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     409,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,027,945
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,646
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,471
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,471
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
        


</TABLE>
#### SOUTHERN AMERICAN FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Arnold D. LEVINE and Michael J. Freedman, d/b/a Levine and Freedman, Attorneys at Law, Respondents.

No. 43264.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 13, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 270 So.2d 479.

CARLTON, C. J„ and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# TIME AND DATE:

 10:00 a.m., Thursday, June 21, 2018.

# PLACE:

 Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street (All visitors must use Diagonal Road Entrance), Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

# STATUS:

 Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Board Briefing, Enterprise Solution Modernization Program Update.

2. Board Briefing, NCUA Rules and Regulations, Member Business Loans.

3. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Voluntary Mergers.

4. NCUA Rules and Regulations, Chartering and Field of Membership.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gerard Poliquin, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Gerard Poliquin,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-13136 Filed 6-14-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23

SOCRATES TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants [LOGO]


We have issued our report dated April 12, 1999, accompanying the consolidated 
financial statements incorporated herein by reference or included in the 
Annual Report of Socrates Technologies Corporation, on Form 10-K, for the 
transition period ended December 31, 1998. We hereby consent to the 
incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of 
Socrates Technologies Corporation, on Form S-8 (File No. 333-32395, effective 
July 30, 1997).

                                         GRANT THORNTON LLP

Vienna, Virginia
April 12, 1999
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION Ill 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

The Honorable E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary 

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 

Rachel Carson State Office Building 

400 Market Street 

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101 

Dear Secretary Abruzzo: 

MAR 2 5 2014 

. On MFJ,rch 19, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the 

Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental 

Protection (PADEP). This SIP revision pertains to the update ofthe Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets 

(MVEBs) for the Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton Eight-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area's Maintenance 

Plan. Revisions to the MVEBs consist of an update to the budgets with the use ofthe MOVES2010 

model. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and tec~nically complete, and is 

reviewing it to prepare a direct final rulemaking notice. 

If members of your staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Asrah Khadr, at 215-

814-2071. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

cc: Ms. Joyce E. Epps, Director 

Bureau of Air Quality, PADEP 

Sincerely, 

D\Qv~~ 

Diana Esher, Director 

Air Protection Division 

... tJ Printed on I 00% recycled/recyclable paper with I 00% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. 

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
#### Henry KOORLAND, Appellant, v. FLORIDA GOLF SPECIALTIES, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 71-502.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 7, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Frank SMITH v. Hon. Matthew S. BRANIFF, Judge, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans.

No. 60514.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1977.

In re: Frank Smith applying for writ of mandamus.

Writ denied. No merit in relator’s application. Relator’s appeal is presently pending preparation for appeal in the trial court.

DIXON, J.,

concurs in the denial at this time. Returns indicate the record is in the trial judge’s office awaiting his preparation of per curiams, which may or may not be needed.
MONTH/YEAR___________

REGISTRATION APPLICATION SUMMARY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DATE

PERSONS ASSISTED 

FOR RECRUITING 

SERVICES

MAIL-IN VOTER 

REGISTRATION 

APPLICATIONS 

COMPLETED

VOTER 

REGISTRATION 

INFORMATION FORMS 

COMPLETED - DD 2645

TOTALS 131
#### James J. BEASLEY, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 73-1339.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 19, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 608

To restore the grave marker allowance for veterans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. KANJORSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To restore the grave marker allowance for veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GRAVE MARKER ALLOWANCE.

4 Section 906 of title 38, United States Code, is

5 amended by adding at the end the following new sub6 section:

7 ‘‘(e) In lieu of furnishing a headstone or marker

8 under subsection (a)(2) or (b) of this section, the Sec9 retary, in the Secretary’s discretion, having due regard for

10 the circumstances in each case, may reimburse the person

11 entitled to request such headstone or marker for the cost

12 of acquiring a non-Government headstone or marker for
2

•HR 608 IH

1 placement in any cemetery other than a national cemetery

2 in connection with the burial or memorialization of the de3 ceased individual. The cost referred to in the preceding

4 sentence is the cost actually incurred by or on behalf of

5 such person or the cost prepaid by the deceased individual

6 as the case may be. Reimbursement under this subsection

7 may be made only upon the request of the person entitled

8 to request the headstone or marker and may not be made

9 in an amount in excess of the average actual cost, as deter10 mined by the Secretary, of headstones and markers fur11 nished under subsections (a) and (b) of this section.’’.

Æ
256 La. 843

#### Mrs. Claudia Louise GUY v. Laurence L. EGANO, Taxicab Bonding Association, Inc., and St. Louis Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Inc.

No. 50736.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1970.

In re: Taxicab Bonding Association, Inc., St. Louis Fire and Marine Insurance Company and Laurence L. Egano applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 236 So.2d 542.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-15(E) OR 15D-15(E)
   OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas W. Busch, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dynamic Leisure
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the year covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the years presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the year in which this report is being
prepared;

   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
year covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006

/s/ Thomas W. Busch
-------------------
Thomas W. Busch
Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Donald R. JONES.

No. 60955.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 1977.

In re: Donald R. Jones applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Richard B. Williams, Judge of the Tenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Natchi-toches to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 28th day of November, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained..

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Kinetics Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended November 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry M. Heimendinger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Larry M. HeimendingerLarry M. Heimendinger Chief Executive Officer January 14, 2004




24
# C_2016263EN.01000102.xml

| 20.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8094 — BNP Paribas Fortis Private Equity Belgium/Sofindev IV/DHAM/Novy International)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 263/02)

On 14 July 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8094. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8094. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### DREW NATIONAL LEASING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Patrick SETTEMBRINO, d/b/a Patsy’s Pizza Place & Restaurant, Appellee.

No. 71-802.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 2, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 20, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997<F1>
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-01-1997
<CASH>                                           3,707
<SECURITIES>                                    16,446
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,131
<PP&E>                                           4,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,365
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,956
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,640
<SALES>                                         18,454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,454
<CGS>                                              310
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   585
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 960
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,581
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,581
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,124
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
<FN>
<F1>In the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 common share equivalents, if
included, would have an anti-dilutive effect on the net loss per share
calculation and are therefore excluded from the fully diluted calculation.
If included, the net loss per share would be $0.36 per share.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### PESTONIT NURSERY & FLOWERS, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. Cipriano CABRERA et al., Respondents.

No. 42281.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 6, 1972.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                                   REMEDY GMBH
                               REMEDY CANADA, LTD.
                                 REMEDY KK, LTD.
                                REMEDY PTE, LTD.
                                REMEDY PTY., LTD.
                           REMEDY INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
                          REMEDY SOFTWARE IRELAND, LTD.
                         REMBAY ACQUISITION CORPORATION
                         REMEDY ACQUISITION CORPORATION
                               REMEDY CAYMAN, LTD.
                                   REMEDY SARL
                                   REMEDY SRL
                          REMEDY SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS BV
                                REMEDY SPAIN S.L.
                               REMEDY SOFTWARE AB
                                 REMEDY UK, LTD.
                                 REMEDY HK, LTD.
                    REMEDY FSC, LTD., A BARBADOS CORPORATION
#### Sidney J. PECK, Appellant, v. Leatrice K. PECK, Appellee.

No. 73-944.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 12, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Coastal Financial Corporation:


We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements (No.
333-54794, 333-49741 and 333-01274) on Form S-8 of Coastal Financial Corporation
of our  report  dated  October  24,  2001,  with  respect  to  the  consolidated
statements  of  financial   condition  of  Coastal  Financial   Corporation  and
subsidiaries  as of September  30, 2001 and 2000,  and the related  consolidated
statements of operations,  stockholders'  equity and comprehensive  income,  and
cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period ended  September 30,
2001, which report is incorporated by reference in the September 30, 2001 Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Coastal Financial Corporation.


                                                        /s/ KPMG LLP
                                                        ------------
                                                        KPMG LLP

Greenville, South Carolina
December 21, 2001
#### Glen T. ALLEN et al., general partners d/b/a Reynolds & Co., Appellants, v. Richard H. DeMOTT, Appellee.

No. 71-13.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 14, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Claude R. Edwards, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 3, 2022 No. 04-22-00129-CV IN THE INTEREST OF K.S., a Child From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20-08-00147-CVK Honorable Joel B. Johnson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellants’ (R.S. and T.R.) First Motion for Extension of Time to file Appellants’ Brief is hereby GRANTED. Appellants’ brief is due on or before June 9, 2022.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of June, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court