alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0000040656
<NAME>    GENERAL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,527
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  62,997
<ALLOWANCES>                                   882
<INVENTORY>                                    34,128
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,471
<PP&E>                                         217,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 553,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          86,677
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       369
<OTHER-SE>                                     95,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   553,889
<SALES>                                        106,397
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,397                                          
<CGS>                                          71,108
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  86,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               69
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                14,563
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5,097
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 9,466
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   9,466
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.26
        


</TABLE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 817

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain cash

rents will not result in the recapture of the benefits of the special

estate tax valuation rules for certain farm and other real property.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that certain cash rents will not result in the recapture

of the benefits of the special estate tax valuation rules

for certain farm and other real property.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farm Estate Fairness

5 Act’’.
2

HR 817 IH

1 SEC. 2. NO RECAPTURE OF SPECIAL ESTATE TAX VALU2 ATION BENEFIT WHERE QUALIFIED HEIR

3 RENTS ON NET CASH BASIS TO ANOTHER

4 MEMBER OF DECEDENT’S FAMILY.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 2032A

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to tax

7 treatment of dispositions and failures to use for qualified

8 use) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following

9 new paragraph:

10 ‘‘(8) EXCEPTION FOR NET CASH RENTING TO

11 ANOTHER FAMILY MEMBER.—For purposes of this

12 subsection, a qualified heir shall not be treated as

13 failing to use the qualified real property in a quali14 fied use solely because such heir rents such property

15 to another member of the decedent’s family on a net

16 cash basis.’’

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—

18 (1) The amendment made by this section shall

19 apply with respect to estates of decedents dying

20 after December 31, 1976.

21 (2) If credit or refund of any overpayment of

22 tax resulting from the amendment made by this sec23 tion is barred at any time before the close of the 1-

24 year period beginning on the date of the enactment

25 of this Act by the operation of any law or rule of

26 law, credit or refund of such overpayment shall, nev-
3

HR 817 IH

1 ertheless, be allowed or made if claim therefor is

2 filed before the close of such 1-year period.

Æ
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

              CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         DATE OF REPORT: August 12, 2002
                (Date of earliest event reported) August 7, 2002


                        DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


        OKLAHOMA                  000-29225                73-1513309
(State or other jurisdiction     (Commission             (IRS Employer
    of incorporation)            File Number)          Identification No.)

         14201 Wireless Way
       Oklahoma City, Oklahoma                     73134
(Address of principal executive offices)         (Zip Code)

                                 (405) 529-8500
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



Information To Be Included in the Report


Item 5.  Other Events.

     Dobson Communications Corporation (the "Company") disclosed new information
on several  issues in its second quarter  earnings  conference  call  Wednesday,
August 7, including:

     During the  second  quarter  ended June 30,  2002,  the  Company  purchased
     approximately  415,000  shares of its Class A stock at an average  price of
     $1.50 per share,  bringing total purchases since inception of the plan last
     September to $4.2 million.

     The  Company  has revised its  guidance  on  proportionate  net  subscriber
     additions  for 2002 to a range of 120,000  to  130,000,  compared  with its
     previous  guided  range of  130,000  to  140,000.  With  regard to its 2002
     guidance on EBITDA of a range of $338 million to $344  million,  management
     of the Company believes that the Company will be at the top of the range or
     above.   Proportionate   numbers  include  the  results  of  the  Company's
     operations  and 50 percent of the results of the  Company's  fifty  percent
     owned subsidiary, American Cellular Corporation.

     Finally, the Company was asked if exhibits referenced but not included with
     its most recently  filed Annual Report on Form 10-K contain  information on
     termination  clauses in its new 10-year  roaming  agreement  with  Cingular
     Wireless. The Company is responding in this filing that the exhibits do not
     include additional information on termination clauses.


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,
the Registrant has duly  caused  this  report to be signed on its  behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                     DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION


                                     By BRUCE R. KNOOIHUIZEN
                                        Bruce R. Knooihuizen,
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer


August 12, 2002
|   | (a) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                  |   |                                                                                                          |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: August 4, 2010 |   | /s/ Stoney M. Stubbs, Jr.                                                                                     |
|                  |   | Stoney M. Stubbs, Jr.Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)          |
|                  |   |                                                                                                          |
| Dated: August 4, 2010 |   | /s/ John R. McManama                                                                                          |
|                  |   | John R. McManamaSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-02856) pertaining to the LifeRate Systems, Inc. 1993 Stock
Option Plan, as amended, in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-06783) pertaining to the LifeRate Systems, Inc. Employee Stock Option Plan
and in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-04939) dated June 21,
1996, of our report dated February 27, 1998, with respect to the financial
statements of LifeRate Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1997.

                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 25, 1998
Exhibit 31(c)
I, Wallace A. Patzke, Jr., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Florida Rock Industries,
Inc;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a.	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b.	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluations; and

c.	disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

a.	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information and

b.	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:  May 9, 2005
                                                WALLACE A. PATZKE, JR.
                                                WALLACE A. PATZKE, JR.
                                                Vice President, Controller
                                                and Chief Accounting Officer

1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1254

CANDIDO DELOS ANGELEZ MARTINEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: August 24, 2020 Decided: August 28, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Candido Delos Angelez Martinez, Petitioner Pro Se. Robert Michael Stalzer, Office of 

Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, 

D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Candido Delos Angelez Martinez (“Martinez”), a native and citizen of El Salvador, 

has filed a pro se petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals 

affirming the Immigration Judge’s written decision (1) finding Martinez’s application for 

asylum was time-barred; and (2) denying on the merits Martinez’s applications for 

withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture. On appeal, 

we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). 

However, even affording Martinez’s pro se informal brief a liberal construction, see 

Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (instructing courts to liberally construe pro se 

documents), we conclude that Martinez has failed to challenge any aspect of the 

Immigration Judge’s dispositive rationale, which the Board expressly adopted by affirming 

the order of removal for the reasons set forth by the Immigration Judge. We therefore hold 

that Martinez has forfeited appellate review of the Board’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 

775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under 

Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30164-30165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13847]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP18-900-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Removal of Expiring Newfield 
Agreements to be effective 8/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 6/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20180620-5017.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-901-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement 
Update (Pioneer July-Sept 2018) to be effective 7/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 6/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20180620-5091.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-902-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Tariff Merger Filing--June 18 
to be effective 7/21/2018.
    Filed Date: 6/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20180620-5093.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-903-000.
    Applicants: Dauphin Island Gathering Partners.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Filing 6-21-
2018 to be effective 6/21/2018.
    Filed Date: 6/20/18.
    Accession Number: 20180620-5117.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/2/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For

[[Page 30165]]

other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 
502-8659.

    Dated: June 21, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-13847 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
263 La. 370

#### Willie MONTGOMERY v. The CITY OF NEW ORLEANS and the Travelers Insurance Company.

No. 52942.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 16, 1972.

In re: Willie Montgomery applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 266 So.2d 482.

Writ denied. Under the facts found by the court of appeal, the result is correct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FOHP,
INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION IN SUCH
REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                     0000937817
<NAME>                                    FOHP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                    36,664,911
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              3,766,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                 100,000
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          50,442,629
<PP&E>                                     3,223,032
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,338,474
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            54,252,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     80,118,284
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      21,002
<OTHER-SE>                               (25,887,069)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              54,252,217
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         257,376,308
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            236,440,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            11,247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (30,744,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     924
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (30,745,106)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                             (30,745,106)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (14.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (14.64)



</TABLE>
#### Betty A. D’Agnese, Appellant, v Diana Spinelli, Respondent.

[737 NYS2d 301]

In an action to recover damages for breach of a real estate contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered July 10, 2001, which denied her motion for summary judgment on her first through fourth causes of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on her first through fourth causes of action, which seek to retain the defendant’s $20,000 down payment as damages for breach of the parties’ real estate contract. There are triable issues of fact as to whether the plaintiffs consent to close title on December 2, 1999, was conditioned upon the defendant’s promise to execute a possession agreement, and whether the plaintiffs failure to appear for the scheduled closing on December 2, 1999, breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing implied in every contract *(see, Miller v Almquist,*241 AD2d 181; *Tepedino v City of Long Beach,*226 AD2d 446; *Binks v Farooq,*178 AD2d 999). There are also issues of fact as to whether the plaintiff waived strict compliance with the provisions of the mortgage contingency clause, and whether the defendant exercised good faith to retain the mortgage commitment which was previously issued by her lender *(see, Creighton v Milbauer,*191 AD2d 162). Smith, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

114) ll-K-(B)-103 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:52 AM Sheet 114 of 325 
P.2 

_ = f) ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS, INC. 

"-MBM03 

April 6, 1983 

Mr. Robert Short 

Economic Analysis Branch 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Drop-12 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Subject: EPA Contract No. 68-02-3564, Work Assignment #9 

Dear Robert: 

Attached is the proposed industrial fossil fuel demand projections for 

the industrial boiler NSPS SO- impact analysis. These projections are 

consistent with the proposed industrial fossil fuel price forecasts 

dated April 4, 1983. 

Sincerely, 

J. /yO~s~ kfefy*^-

Tim Hogan 

TH:mk 

Attachment 

cc: Al Wehe 
P.3 

,...-*•. r. »" 

PROJECTIONS OF INDUSTRIAL FOSSIL FUEL DEMAND' 

(IO12 Btu) 

Demand Region 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

New England 

New York/New Jersey 

Middle Atlantic 

South Atlantic 

Midwest 

Southwest 

Central 

North Central 

West 

Northwest 

U.S. TOTAL 

1985 

206.2 

528.6 

1,021.3 

1,450.1 

2,194.8 

3,284.8 

496.4 

371.8 

697.5 

350.1 

10,601.5 

1990 

227.0 

582.2 

1,127.6 

1,604.9 

2,3f2.5 

3,602.8 

530.4 

405.3 

794.7 

389.5 

11,576.9 

1995 

247.5 

637.8 

1,224.9, 

1,754.0 

2,506.7 

3,948.8 

581.8 

438.1 

858.4 

421.5 

12,619.4 

Includes coal, residual and distillate fuel oil and natural gas consumption in boilers and process heat equipment. Excludes fuel demand 

for feedstocks or raw materials.