alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Record of Meeting

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0350

On April 8, 2013, the Presidents of AOPA and EAA met with the Administrator and AVS representatives to discuss a Request for Exemption filed by the two organizations.

The organizations requested exemption from various Federal Aviation Regulations

related to FAA

- issued medical certificates. The executives stated they believe that data from the Sport Pilot community

-- where pilots may fly without a third class medical

ce rtificate

-- supports the request for exemption. They stated that requiring a recurrent educational program paired with a thorough self

- assessment as a condition of the exemption is a responsible alternative to requiring a medical certificate. They stated that AOPA and EAA have the mechanism in place to provide the training and to track that members using the exemption have completed the training. They stated that by granting the exemption, the FAA would reduce the likelihood that pilots would transition f rom an aircraft where they had long experience to a light sport aircraft. They pointed out that

transition from one aircraft to another is a known risk that can result in fatal accidents.

The executives asked that should the FAA at some point contemplate a denial of the petition that the Administrator consider approving the request and limiting the number of pilots to whom it would apply or issue it for a limited period of time so that more data could be collected to support general rulemaking that might c hange the requirements for the third class medical certificate for all pilots.

The Administrator assured them that FAA would give full consideration to the request for exemption.
#### Richard J. HIGGINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 3748.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 2, 1972.

Rehearing Denied April 18, 1972.

Hall, Raggio & Farrar by R. W. Farrar, Jr., Lake Charles, for defendant-appellant.

Kierr & Gainsburgh by Wilson M. Mon-tero, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiff-appel-lee.

Before FRUGÉ, MILLER, and DO-MENGEAUX, JJ.

FRUGÉ, Judge.

Mr. and Mrs. Richard J. Higgins were injured in an automobile accident in Lake Charles, Louisiana. The negligence of Mr. Dewitt Floyd Burns, was found by the trial court to be the sole, proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries. Property damage in the form of automobile and medical bills amounted to $395.68. Also, an award of $6,000 was granted to Mrs. Richard J. Higgins for the pain and suffering she experienced due to defendant’s negligence. The defendant appeals asserting that the trial court’s award is grossly excessive in light of the injuries which were proven by Mrs. Richard Higgins. After a careful study of the medical testimony, and of the record in its entirety, we find no manifest error on the part of the trial court in its ascertainment of damages. All costs are to be borne by the defendant-appellant.

Affirmed.
### S10-1003 1 I-00 3



# vLLkJ—m X Illinoi s Manufacturers ' Associatio n vvwvv.inia-mi.or g

i. M i Wos l 22\u i Sli.r ! •Siiili - (i2 0 • ( Ki k Hrook . Illinoi s 605: ! i •6.^0 - if.K-5;{() 0 •htx : 6;50-218-~-t6 7 .?J( ) lo- l Adam s Slrw l • hpringlickl , lllinui s 6270 1 •2 I 7-"ij:M2-fl ) •Fnx : 2 17-522- 2 !f. 7 tni.iil : im.iiiiimj-tv'i.orj: ; Marc h 4 , 201 0 Honorabl e Raymon d H . LaHoo d Secretar y U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 NewJerse

yAvenue , S

E Washington , D.C , 2059 0

Docke t DOT-OST201 0 003 4 lo/c - cc^ l Dea rSecretar

yLaHood : O n behal fo fth e Illinoi s Manufacturers ' Associatio n an d ou rthousand s o fmembe rcompanie s locate d acros s th e state , I woul d lik e t o expres s ou rstron g support o fth e applicatio n fo rantitrus t immunit y an d propose d join t busines s agreemen t file d b yAmerica n Airline s an d Japa n Airlines . Th e propose d allianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s i s vita l fo rth e oneworl d Allianc e t o compet e effectivel ywit h th e Sta r an d Sk yTea m Alliances . Increasin g competitio n wil l enhanc e th e benefit s o fth e Departmen t o f Transportation' s Ope n Skie s polic y- firs t b ysolidifyin g U.S.-Japa n Ope n Skie s an d the n b yservin g a s a foundatio n fo rfurthe rliberalizatio n acros s Asia . Illinoi s i s hom e t o a numbe ro fgloba l companie s like Caterpillar , Deere & Company , an d Arche rDaniel s Midlan d tha t rel yo n a n ope n an d competitiv e marketplace . Th e oneworl d Allianc e wil l have a positiv e impact o n ai rtrave l b

yofferin g customer s mor e service , schedulin g an d pricin g options , an d othe r benefit s create d b

ystron g competitio n amon g thre e competitiv e ai ralliances . Afte ra thoroug h review , w e encourag e th e Departmen t o fTransportatio n t o approv e thi s AA/JA L applicatio n a

s i t woul d enabl e thes e oneworl d Allianc e airline s t o wor k closel ytogethe rt o delive rhighl y competitiv e ai rtransportatio n services . Th e U.S . DO Tca n hel p ensur e tha t airline s hav e ever y opportunit yt o staycompetitiv e i n bot h a challengin g econom yan d increasingl ygloba l marke t by approvin g thi s application . Than k yo u fo ryou rhar d wor k i n achievin g th e U.S.-Japa n Ope n Skie s agreemen t an d I loo k forwar d t o you rquic k

approva l o fthi s pendin g application . Sincerely , Gregor yVV . Bais ? Presiden t & CE

O

5('(V';>i£, ' Illinoi s nuiniUicluror s sincx ' III9 J
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Kinetics Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Sandy B. Sewitch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Sandy B. SewitchSandy B. SewitchChief Financial OfficerApril 14, 2005
**Exhibit 10.130**

 

**CONSULTING AGREEMENT AMENDED ADDENDUM**

 

This Consulting Agreement Amended Addendum is entered into effective asof October 1, 2004, and is a supplement to, and modification of, thatcertain Consulting Agreement (the “Original Agreement”) by and between F.Y.I.Incorporated (n/k/a *SOURCECORP,*Incorporated)(the “Company”) and David Lowenstein (“Consultant”), dated as of January 1,2000.

 

1.             **Fee Modification.**  Effective October 1, 2004, in additionto the fees contemplated by Section 2 of the Original Agreement,Consultant’s hourly rate of $140 per hour for services Consultant performs atthe request of, and on behalf of, the Company, subject to the aggregatecompensation limitation under the Original Agreement of $250,000 for anycalendar year, shall no longer be capped at $1000 per day.  The proviso of Section 1 (which relatesto activities not subject to an hourly rate) of that certain ConsultingAgreement Addendum dated as of March 6, 2003 shall remain in effect.

 

2.             **Governing Laws.**  This Amended Addendum shall in all respect beconstrued according to the laws of the State of Texas.

 

3.             **Counterparts. **This Amended Addendum may be executedsimultaneously in two (2) or more counterparts, each of which shall bedeemed an original and all of which together shall constitute but one and thesame instrument.

 

4.             **Effect of Amended Addendum.**  Except as specifically amended by thisAmended Addendum, all provisions of the Original Agreement remain in full forceand effect in accordance with their express terms.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AmendedAddendum as of the day and year first above written.

 
| ***SOURCECORP,*Incorporated**   | **CONSULTANT**                         |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| **(f/k/a F.Y.I. Incorporated)** | ** **                             |
|                            |                                   |   |
|                            |                                   |   |
| By:                             | /s/ Thomas C. Walker                   |   | /s/ David Lowenstein |
|                            | Thomas C. Walker                       | David Lowenstein |
|                            | Chairman and Chief Development Officer |   |
|                                 |                                        |  |  |

 

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles Wilferd EZEB, Jr.

No. 60226.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1977.

In re: Charles W. Ezeb, Jr. applying for remedial writs.

Writ not considered. Relator must first exhaust his remedies in the trial court.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C 

In the Matter of Aaron Goldring 

Docket No. FAA-201501317 

Case No. 2015EA150014 

Administrative Law Judge I.E. Sullivan 

COMPLAINANT'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

0 7 2016 

1\IG DOCr<ET 

T11e Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the above-captioned case 

by its designated representatives withdraws the Complaint in this case. This request is 

made pursuant to Section 13.215 of the Rules of Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions, 

14 CFR, Part 13, Subpart G. 

Date: SEP 0 1 2016 

Respectfully submitted, 

Patricia A. MeN all 

Acting Assistant Chief Counsel 

for Enforc- .ent 

By: 

f-ffFt-Hr. 

Enforcemen D vision, Northeast Team 

I Aviation Pl a 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Email: Camille.Castillo@faa.gov 

Telephone: (718)553-3278 (direct) 

(718) 995-5699 (fax) 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that on this day copies of the foregoing Complainant's Withdrawal 

of Complaint were sent First Class mail and fax as follows: 

Judge J. E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (EI!-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

I hereby certifY that on this day copies of the foregoing Complainant's Withdrawal 

of Complaint were sent First Class mail, certified mail, Return Receipt Requested 

and Email as follows: 

Mr. Aaron Goldring 

1824 Hendrickson Street 

Brooklyn, NY 11234 

Email: aaron@goldringtech.com 

I hereby certifY that on this day copies of the foregoing Complainant's Withdrawal 

of Complaint were sent first class mail as follows: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Date: 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 

SEP 0 1 2016 ~~: Management and Program Analyst 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434
Exhibit 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (no.
33-87110, 33-98482, 333-06757 and 333-85936) on Form S-8 of The Beard Company
our report dated March 26, 2004, relating to the balance sheets of The Beard
Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related
statements of operations, shareholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows for
the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, which report appears in the
December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of The Beard Company.



COLE & REED P.C.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
March 26, 2004
1 Attachment 

Please find attached our comments on this proposed permit. If you have any questions about these comments, 

please contact us. 

AVENAL ENERGY PROJECT 

James Capp 

to: 

R9AirPermits 

04/05/2011 10:48 AM 

Hide Details 

From: "James Capp" <James.Capp@dnr.state.ga.us>

To: R9AirPermits@EPA 

History: This message has been replied to. 

Georgia EPD Comment Letter Avenal Permit.pdf

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\SRIVER02\Local Settings\Temp\notesBAAA25\~web07... 4/15/2011
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Hyperdynamics Corporation (Hyperdynamics),
      on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Steven M. Plumb, Chief Financial Officer
      of
      Hyperdynamics, does hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
      September 28, 2007





By:
            /s/
                Steven M. PlumbSteven
                M. PlumbChief
                Financial OfficerPrincipal
                Accounting Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

p1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147851 & (16)(17)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147851

COA: 314404

Luce CC: 2007-000889-FC

TAMMY JO WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motions for appointment of counsel and remand are DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Jeffrey L. Wright, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of G&K Services, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report.       Date: February 3, 2006               By:   /s/ Jeffrey L. Wright       Jeffrey L. Wright      Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer      (Principal Financial Officer)  
4
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50067 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OSCAR GARCIA-URBINA, also known as Oscar Gaica-Urbina Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-00-CR-421-ALL

-------------------- October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Oscar Garcia-Urbina appeals the 41-month term of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of illegally reentering the United States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Garcia-Urbina complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on his priorNo. 01-50067 -2- removal following an aggravated felony conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision violates the Due Process Clause. Alternatively, Garcia-Urbina contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Garcia-Urbina acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve the issues for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). GarciaUrbina’s arguments are foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)December 9, 2014(Date of earliest event reported)December 8, 2014





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))










---




Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn December 8, 2014, we and ONEOK, Inc. (ONEOK) announced we will participate in the Wells Fargo Energy Symposium in New York City on December 9-10, 2014.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The materials used at the conference were made available on the ONEOK and ONEOK Partners websites,www.oneok.comandwww.oneokpartners.com, on Tuesday, December 9, beginning at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (7:00 a.m. Central Standard Time).The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)ExhibitsExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated December 8, 2014.


2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:December 9, 2014By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer





3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated December 8, 2014.








4
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 821

AMENDMENTS
In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

April 18, 1994.

Resolved, That the House agree to the amendment of the

Senate to the bill (H.R. 821) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend title

38, United States Code, to extend eligibility for burial in national cemeteries to persons who have 20 years of service

creditable for retired pay as members of a reserve component

of the Armed Forces’’, with the following

AMENDMENTS:

In lieu of the matter inserted by said amendment,

insert:

1 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN RESERVISTS AND DE2 PENDENTS FOR BURIAL IN NATIONAL CEME3 TERIES.

4 (a) RESERVISTS.—Section 2402 of title 38, United

5 States Code, is amended by inserting after paragraph (6)

6 the following new paragraph (7):

7 ‘‘(7) Any person who at the time of death was

8 entitled to retired pay under chapter 67 of title 10 or

9 would have been entitled to retired pay under that

10 chapter but for the fact that the person was under 60

11 years of age.’’.
2

HR 821 EAH

1 (b) DEPENDENTS.—Paragraph (5) of such section is

2 amended by inserting ‘‘and paragraph (7)’’ after ‘‘para3 graphs (1) through (4)’’.

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘An Act to amend

title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility for burial in national cemeteries to persons who have 20 years

of service creditable for retired pay as members of a reserve component of the Armed Forces and to their dependents.’’.

Attest:

Clerk.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00251-CR

Ashlee Castillo

v.

The State of Texas

On appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 17MC-06940-3

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 1, 2019