alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CHAMPION MOBILE HOMES and Consolidated Underwriters, Petitioners, v. John CHANEY and Industrial Relations Commission, Florida Department of Commerce, Respondents.

No. 43953.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 6, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J, and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ, concur.
261 La. 1044

#### James A. EUGENE v. Dr. Karl L. DOUGLAS and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.

No. 52442.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 1972.

In re: St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 260 So.2d 69.

Writ refused: Under the facts found by the court of appeal, there is no error of law.
H. R. 808

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

For the relief of James B. Stanley.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.

(a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out

of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $400,577

to James B. Stanley.

(b) BASIS.—The payment required by subsection (a) shall be

to compensate James B. Stanley for the physical, psychological,

and economic injuries sustained by him as a result of the administration to him, without his knowledge, of lysergic acid diethylamide

by United States Army personnel in 1958.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

The payment made pursuant to section 1(a) shall be in full

satisfaction of all claims James B. Stanley may have against the

United States for—

(1) the injuries received by him as described in section

1; and

(2) for any injuries received by him subsequent to his

discharge from the United States Army that are the result

of the injuries described in section 1.

SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.

James B. Stanley shall not be eligible for any compensation

or benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs or the Department of Defense for any injury received by him as described in

section 1.

SEC. 4. LIMITATION OF ATTORNEYS’ OR AGENTS’ FEES.

It shall be unlawful for an amount of more than 10 per centum

of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid to or received

by any attorney or agent of James B. Stanley for any service

rendered in connection with the payment made by this Act. Any

person who violates this section shall be guilty of an infraction
H. R. 808—2

and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in title

18, United States Code.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
U.S. Department of Transportation Office ofthe Secretary OfTransportation

The Honorable Doc Hastings U.S. House ofRepresentatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Congressman Hastings: ' -·.**~** 1200 New JerseyAve., S.E. Washington, DC 20590

Thank you for your letter supporting the application submitted bythe City ofYakima, Washington, for a grant under the U.S. Department ofTransportation's Small Community Air Service Development Program. The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of40 grant awards each year, although no more than four awards may be to communities in the same State. In order to provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types ofprojects that can be funded. On June 24, the Department issued an order setting a deadline ofJuly 26 for applications. As these grant requests are pending before the Department, I cannot comment on the merits ofany particular proposal. I assure you that the Department will give full and fair consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed. As is our standard practice, I am placing a copy ofyour letter and this response in Docket DOT-OST-2013-0120 as a contact outside the record ofthis matter. I appreciate your interest in this program. Sincerely yours,DOC HASTINGS 4TH DISTRICT, WASHINGTON COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES CHAIRMAN 

# C!Congress of tbt mtntteb**~tates ~oust**  

# ofl\epresentattues

Ms. Brooke Chapman Associate Director August 1, 2013

Small Community Air Service Development Program Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 Dear Ms. Chapman, 1203 LONGWORTH HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515 (202) 225-5816 2715 SAINT ANDREWS LOOP, SUITE D PASCO, WA 99301

(509) 543--9396 402 EAST YAKIMA AVENUE, SUITE 760 YAKIMA, WA 98901

(509) 452-3243 www.hastings.house.gov

I write today to request full and fair consideration for the grant application submittedby Pangborn Memorial Airport inEastWenatchee, Washington, under the Small Community Air Service DevelopmentProgram (SCASDP). As you are aware, access to safe, affordable, and efficienttransportation is critical for rural and underserved areas - this is no more evident than in Central Washington. Whether it is a weekend getaway or traveling for business, itis importantto ensure that our aviation system is integrated and has the abilityto move people and products throughout Central Washington and across ournation. As a result, I requestthat full and fair considerationbe given to Pangborn Memorial Airport andtheir SCASDP grant application. Thank you for your consideration ofthis request. Should you have additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact myselfor Justin Prosser on my staffat 202-225-5816.

# Sin'7"'~ 

# !'1-1-·

_______,.--·

# ~-~
...,.,........,,.•.astings Member ofCongress

:**~** ' '
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Ron Carte, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Zenex
     International, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   [reserved];

     c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     d)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the
          case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls over financial reporting.


Date:   August 15, 2005

   /s/  Ron Carte
        Signature

Title:  Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


       
<S>                                 <C>
<ARTICLE>                                   UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from FPL Group's and FPL's condensed consolidated balance sheet as
of September 30, 1996 and condensed consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 1996
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

<CIK>                               0000753308
<NAME>                         FPL Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            9-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                          PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>           $9,300,760
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>         $1,301,736
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              $1,276,344
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    $0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                        $502,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     $12,381,831
<COMMON>                                    $0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   $0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         $0
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      $4,597,537
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  $42,000
<PREFERRED>                           $289,580
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                $3,262,857
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                          $0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                   $0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>              $0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>               $0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                   $0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                 $0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                            $0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>      $4,189,857
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      $12,381,831
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>           $4,601,392
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                  $261,602
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          $3,619,598
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          $3,619,598
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>               $981,794
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                  ($5,443)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>        $696,783
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>              $202,642
<NET-INCOME>                          $494,141
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            $17,966
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>         $494,141
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              $240,487
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                   $0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              $1,315,189
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            $2.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                            $2.84

        

</TABLE>
#### Johnnie Lee THOMAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-769.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 24, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender and Harold Melville, Legal Intern, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., J. Robert Olian and William L. Rogers, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

*218Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty of second degree murder after a trial before a jury. On this appeal, the points raised are directed to the court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress a confession. Appellant argues that the court erred in two particulars: (1) in failing to hear the motion to suppress prior to the trial, and (2) in failing to grant the motion.

The trial court heard evidence and denied appellant’s motion outside the hearing of the jury and prior to the admission of any testimony referring to the confession. Appellant contends that the court erred in failing to hear evidence on the motion prior to the trial. We need not determine, in this case, whether the rule directs a hearing prior to trial of testimony on a motion to suppress. But see Foster v. State, Fla.App.1971, 255 So.2d 533. In the instant case, appellant, by his own conduct, made impractical the hearing of the motion before the trial. The motion was filed one day before trial after the case had been set for trial for some time and witnesses had been subpoenaed. In addition, no hearing was requested on the motion until after the case had been called for trial. Under these circumstances, the appellant cannot complain that the cause was not continued in order to hear his motion. See Kemp v. State, Fla.App. 3rd 1973, 271 So.2d 777; Dickenson v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 261 So.2d 561.

Appellant’s second point urging error upon the merits of the motion to suppress presents a factual question. Appellant’s argument is in effect that the evidence before the court was such that the finding that the appellant was capable of making a voluntary statement is not supported by evidence that is free of reasonable doubt. Our review of the record convinces us that such is not the case.

Since we have failed to find error upon any of the matters assigned, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Affirmed.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8202 

To designate the airport traffic control tower located at Piedmont Triad 

International Airport in Greensboro, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Senator 

Kay Hagan Airport Traffic Control Tower’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2020 

Mr. BUDD (for himself, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Ms. 

ADAMS, Mr. MURPHY of North Carolina, Mr. WALKER, Mr. HOLDING, 

and Mr. ROUZER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the airport traffic control tower located at 

Piedmont Triad International Airport in Greensboro, 

North Carolina, as the ‘‘Senator Kay Hagan Airport 

Traffic Control Tower’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The airport traffic control tower located at Piedmont 

5 Triad International Airport in Greensboro, North Caro6 lina, and any successor airport traffic control tower at that 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8202 IH

1 location, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Senator 

2 Kay Hagan Airport Traffic Control Tower’’. 

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the airport 

6 traffic control tower referred to in section 1 shall be 

7 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Senator Kay Hagan Air8 port Traffic Control Tower’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Bruce F. WEICHT, Appellant, v. Patricia R. WEICHT, Appellee.

No. 72-15.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 3, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 9, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60633 Summary Calendar

SERGIO PARRA-ROMERO, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A95 607 744

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Sergio Parra-Romero, a native and citizen of Mexico, appeals the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b. Because cancellation of removal is governed by § 1229b, the jurisdictional bar of 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) applies in the instant case. This court lacks jurisdiction to review the Attorney General’s discretionary decision regarding cancellation of removal. See Rueda v. Ashcroft , 380 F.3d 831, 831 (5th Cir.No. 06-60633 -2- 2004); § 1229b(b); § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i). The petition for review is DISMISSED.
N8834P 

November 28, 2014 

On November 28,2014 at approximately 1500, a call was dispatched to fuel N8834P in front of the 

Boston Executive Helicopter hangar. When Lineman Steve Annis arrived he informed the owner I 

operator, Norwood Airport Commissioner Oulton Hues Jr., that he could not fuel the aircraft in its current 

location per T.O.F.A. restrictions, and that the aircraft would have to be moved to another location that 

was in compliance. Mr. Hues was visibly upset by this, and requested that somebody come down and 

explain the T.O.F.A. regulations to him. Steve relayed the message to me on the radio. I was quite busy 

restacking hangars and explained over the radio that Mr. Hues is on The Norwood Airport Commission, 

and that he knows exactly what the T.O.F.A. regulations are. I then instructed Steve that if Mr. Hues was 

not willing to have his plane moved to be fueled, then to drive away because he is attempting to bait 

FlightLevel into violating the T.O.F.A. regulations. After that, Mr. Hues said we could move the aircraft 

to fuel it. I then dispatched Jesse Coreas (another Lineman on duty) to move the aircraft. The plane took 

33.5 gallons. 

I later learned from an eyewitness at the scene that Norwood Airport Commissioner Paul Shaughnessy 

had been parked nearby in his Camaro watching the event unfold (along with a few people watching from 

just outside of the Boston Executive Helicopter hangar), and when Jesse arrived to move the airplane, Mr. 

Shaughnessy drove off. Steve also reported that just before I replied on the radio about Mr. Hues being 

on the Commission, a woman in the plane had been demanding in a loud voice to know who made the 

rules about not fue ling in the T.O.F.A. But when my radio reply came in, Mr. Hues turned to her and 

instructed her to be quiet. 

The above is what happened to the best of my recollection and what I was told. 

Sincerely, 

Kevin Putnam 

Line Supervisor 

FLIGHTLEVEL Norwood LLC
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 14, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________ No. 04-30400 (Summary Calendar)

_________________ In the Matter Of: WILLIAM T WESTMORELAND; MARY B WESTMORELAND, Debtors,

-------------------------------------------------- WILLIAM T WESTMORELAND; MARY B WESTMORELAND, Appellants,
versus UNITED STATES TRUSTEE; LUCY G SIKES, Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:03-CV-1971
Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *47.5.4. -2-

We affirm

t he dist rict court’s judgment essentially for the reasons given in its Opinion of January 26, 2004. AFFIRMED.
Additional TSDs related to Reliability, IPM, and feasibility Bill Maxwell to: Cortney_Higgins 03/04/2011 05:12 PM Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Jeb Stenhouse

Cortney --

Attached are a number of additional TSDs.

Thanks.

Resource Adequacy and Reliability_v4.docx This TSD was originally submitted; this version reflects the typo you caught in a data table.

Documentation Supplement for v410 PTR - Parts 1and 2 2-15-11.doc IPM documentation TSD.

Toxics Rule feasibility 03-04-11_for OMB.docx Toxics rule feasibility study.

Documentation for IPM can be found in the docket for this rulemaking or
at http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/progsregs/epa-ipm/index.html"> http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/progsregs/epa-ipm/index.html. -- which documents on the page is EPA referring to? (562) Please correctthis link to be http://www.epa.gov/airmarkt/progsregs/epaipm/BaseCasev410.html#documentation .

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450
# Official Journal L 100/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 100 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6012 April 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 100

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6012 April 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/653 of 8 March 2017 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on key information documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) by laying down regulatory technical standards with regard to the presentation, content, review and revision of key information documents and the conditions for fulfilling the requirement to provide such documents (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/653 of 8 March 2017 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on key information documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) by laying down regulatory technical standards with regard to the presentation, content, review and revision of key information documents and the conditions for fulfilling the requirement to provide such documents (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.