alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add Global Expedited Package Services—Non-Published Rates 14 (GEPS-NPR 14) to the Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of notice:*                         June 28, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kyle R. Coppin, 202-268-2368.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642, on June 22, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to add Global Expedited Package Services—Non-Published Rates 14 (GEPS—NPR 14) to the Competitive Products List and Notice of Filing GEPS—NPR 14 Model Contract and Application for Non-Public Treatment of Materials Filed Under Seal.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-186 and CP2018-260.                

Ruth Stevenson,

Attorney, Federal Compliance.

[FR Doc. 2018-13879 Filed 6-27-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**FROZEN
      FOOD EXPRESS INDUSTRIES, INC.**


**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc.
      (the "company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 as
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Stoney M. Stubbs, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (a) the Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      company.




Dated:
                August 8, 2007
            
            /s/
                Stoney M. Stubbs, Jr.Stoney
                M. Stubbs, Jr.
              Chairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive
                Officer
Devany, Dennis (OST) From: mjbland@aoLcom

.Sent: ":'

. 'Saturday, February 13, 201010:19AM To: Devany, Dennis (OST) Dear

### Mr,Devany,

., .-, ­ Iam a resident of the Plattsburgh, New York area. Iam extremely unhappywith the recommendation of our elected officials on the Cape Airvs. Colgan Air contract. Cape Air has a proven track record of serving the community. It**promises/gu~rantees** a reasonable rate and 21 weekly flights to Boston. Colgan promises/guarantees nothing except avague we will provide some level of service, less than Cape Air and at a higher price. Iam familiarwith Colgan from other places I have lived. They are not service oriented, they are highly driven by profit, are not reliable and have some safety issues. I can only assume that they have astrong lobbying contingent and have thus influenced our elected officials. Since you are not tied to the recommendation of the legislatures, Iwould hope that you would considerthe common man here and go with Cape Air. We can afford them, we can depend on them and they have shown that they care. Thankyou foryour consideration of this matter. MaryJean Bland 41 Cascade Lane Jay, NY 12941 (518) 647-5803

1
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                       CALCULATION OF EARNING PER SHARE

    In the calculation of earning per share for the years ended December 31,
1996 and 1995, weighted shares outstanding have been computed as follows:

                                                      For the Year Ended
                                                         December 31,
                                                    ------------------------
                                                      1996           1995
                                                    ---------      ---------
Weighted Average shares outstanding -
   Shares outstanding from beginning of period      5,548,402      4,212,499
   Sale of 19,007 shares of Common Stock
     through Employee Stock Purchase Plan              26,483             --
   Acquisition of LOR/GB with issuance of
     578,651 shares on Common Stock on
     February 13, 1996                                509,086             --
   Issuance of 1,300,000 shares of Common Stock
     for initial public offering on March 20, 1995         --      1,015,068
   Weighted options outstanding(1)                         --        621,175
   Stock Options exercised during the period          144,003        213,544
                                                    ---------      ---------
Weighted Average Common and Common equivalent
   shares outstanding                               6,527,974      6,062,288


   (1) EXCLUDES ANTI-DILUTIVE COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENTS IN THE WEIGHTED
       AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING CALCULATION FOR 1996.
<TABLE>






                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                                        HARCOURT GENERAL, INC.

<CAPTION>
Computation of weighted  average number of shares  outstanding used in  determining primary and
fully diluted earnings per share:

(In thousands)                                                    For the three months
                                                                    ended January 31,  

                                                                   1996          1995


PRIMARY

<S>                                                              <C>           <C>
1.  Weighted average number of common
          shares outstanding                                     71,827        77,911

2.  Assumed conversion of Series A
          Cumulative Convertible Stock                            1,317         1,596

3.  Assumed exercise of certain stock
          options based on average
          market value                                              216           295
 
4.  Weighted average number of shares
          used in primary per share
          computations                                           73,360        79,802
  
FULLY DILUTED (A)

1.  Weighted average number of common 
          shares outstanding                                     71,827        77,911

2.  Assumed conversion of Series A
          Cumulative Convertible Stock                            1,317         1,596

3.  Assumed exercise of all dilutive
          options based on higher of
          average or closing market value                           216           295

4.  Weighted average number of shares
          used in fully diluted per share
          computations                                           73,360        79,802




(A)This  calculation is submitted in accordance with Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 Release No.
9083 although  not required by  Footnote 2  to Paragraph 14  of APB  Opinion No.
15 because it  results in dilution of less than 3%.

[Page]
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 952

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to adjust the $50 threshold

for payment of social security taxes on wages paid for domestic service

in a private home for inflation since the $50 threshold was established,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 17, 1993

Mr. SARPALIUS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to adjust

the $50 threshold for payment of social security taxes

on wages paid for domestic service in a private home

for inflation since the $50 threshold was established,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INFLATION ADJUSTMENT OF $50 THRESHOLD

4 FOR PAYMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES

5 ON WAGES PAID FOR DOMESTIC SERVICE IN

6 A PRIVATE HOME.

7 (a) AMENDMENTS OF INTERNAL REVENUE CODE.—
2

•HR 952 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section

2 3121(a)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is

3 amended by striking ‘‘$50’’ and inserting ‘‘the appli4 cable dollar threshold under subsection (y) for such

5 quarter’’.

6 (2) DOLLAR THRESHOLD.—Section 3121 of

7 such Code is amended by adding at the end thereof

8 the following new subsection:

9 ‘‘(y) DOLLAR THRESHOLD FOR DOMESTIC SERVICE

10 IN A PRIVATE HOME.—

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The dollar threshold appli12 cable under subsection (a)(7)(B) for any calendar

13 quarter is $245.

14 ‘‘(2) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—In the

15 case of any calendar quarter beginning after 1993,

16 the dollar amount contained in paragraph (1) shall

17 be increased by an amount equal to—

18 ‘‘(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by

19 ‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter20 mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar

21 year in which such quarter begins by substitut22 ing ‘calendar year 1992’ for ‘calendar year

23 1989’ in subparagraph (B) thereof.’’

24 (3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The second

25 sentence of section 3102(a) of such Code is amended
3

•HR 952 IH

1 by striking ‘‘$50’’ and inserting ‘‘the applicable

2 dollar threshold under section 3121(y) for such

3 quarter’’.

4 (b) AMENDMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.—Sub5 paragraph (B) of section 209(a)(6) of the Social Security

6 Act is amended by striking ‘‘$50’’ and inserting ‘‘the ap7 plicable dollar threshold under section 3121(y) of the In8 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 for such quarter’’.

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 this section shall apply to calendar quarters beginning

11 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-2938) of Horizon Health Corporation and the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-36953) of Horizon Health
Corporation of our report dated October 13, 1997 appearing on page F - 2 of
this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears on page S - 2 of this Form
10-K.



PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Dallas, Texas
November 21, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7577 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7577

  To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize members of the 
     reserve components of the Armed Forces to participate in the 
           Skillbridge program of the Department of Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2020

 Mrs. Axne (for herself, Mr. Timmons, Mr. Brindisi, Mr. Bost, Mr. Rose 
of New York, and Mr. Murphy of North Carolina) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize members of the 
     reserve components of the Armed Forces to participate in the 
           Skillbridge program of the Department of Defense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transition for Success Act''.

SEC. 2. PARTICIPATION OF MEMBERS OF THE RESERVE COMPONENTS OF THE ARMED 
              FORCES IN THE SKILLBRIDGE PROGRAM.

    Section 1143(e)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
    ``(2) A member of the armed forces is eligible for a program under 
this subsection if--
            ``(A) the member--
                    ``(i) has completed at least 180 days on active 
                duty in the armed forces; and
                    ``(ii) is expected to be discharged or released 
                from active duty in the armed forces within 180 days of 
                the date of commencement of participation in such a 
                program; or
            ``(B) the member is a member of a reserve component.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 11.1
STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
AG-CHEM EQUIPMENT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       1997             1996            1995
                                                   -----------      -----------     -----------
<S>                                                  <C>              <C>             <C>      
Shares outstanding at beginning of year              9,695,768        9,595,768       9,639,768

Issuance of common stock                                  --            100,000            --

Repurchase and retirement of common stock              (25,500)            --           (44,000)
                                                   -----------      -----------     -----------

Shares outstanding at end of year                    9,670,268        9,695,768       9,595,768
                                                   ===========      ===========     ===========

Weighted average common shares outstanding           9,683,341        9,671,932       9,603,878
                                                   ===========      ===========     ===========

Net earnings                                       $     7,570      $     9,748     $    11,409
                                                   ===========      ===========     ===========

Earnings per common share                          $      0.78      $      1.01     $      1.19
                                                   ===========      ===========     ===========
</TABLE>

In May 1995, the Board of Directors declared a four-for-one stock split effected
in the form of a stock dividend. Par value remained at $.01 per share. All share
and per share amounts have been restated to retroactively reflect the stock
split.
NUMBER 13-12-00470-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JAHIRIEIKONEN ISRAEL-LOWE, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 404th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas

ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Per Curiam

Appellant, Jahirieikonen Israel-Lowe, filed a notice of appeal with this Court from 

his conviction. The record currently before the Court fails to include a certification of 

appellant’s right to appeal. Based upon information provided by the district clerk’s office, 

a certification has not yet been entered by the trial court. 

Accordingly, this matter is ABATED and REMANDED to the trial court for entry of a 
2

certification of the appellant’s right to appeal. On remand, the trial court shall 

immediately issue notice of a hearing and accordingly conduct a hearing addressing the 

foregoing matter. We further direct that, after conducting the hearing, the trial court 

certify whether appellant has the right of appeal. The trial court's certification, and any 

orders it enters, shall be included in a supplemental clerk's record. The trial court is 

directed to cause the supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court 

within thirty days of the date of this order. Should the trial court require more time to 

comply with the directions of this Court, it shall request an extension prior to the expiration 

of this deadline.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed this

the 21st day of October, 2013.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906


of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Friedman Industries,
Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jack Friedman, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 12, 2005



| |                     
| | --------------------
| | By /s/ JACK FRIEDMAN
| |                     
| | Name: Jack Friedman 

| |        |                                                  
| | ------ | -------------------------------------------------
| | Title: | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Friendly Ice CreamCorporation (“the Company”) for the quarterly period ended April 1, 2001 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Paul V. Hoagland, as Senior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer, Treasurer and Assistant Clerk of the Company, hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

1)              The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | By:                                                                                           | /s/ PAUL V. HOAGLAND |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  Paul V. Hoagland                                                                  |
|   | Title:  Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial  Officer, Treasurer and

Assistant Clerk |
|   |
|   | Date:   November 4, 2002                                                            |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7678
TYRONE HIAWATHA LEE, Petitioner - Appellant, versusRON ANGELONE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-94-533-R) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Hiawatha Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine P. Baldwin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lee v. Angelone , No. CA-94-533-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 22, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Eye Institute Special Emphasis Panel; NEI Pathways To Independence (K99) and Conference (R13) Grant Applications.                    

*Date:*                         July 23-24, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Zhihong Shan, MD, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer (Contractor), Division of Extramural Activities, National Eye Institute, National Institute of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1779,                         *zhihong.shan@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 22, 2018.

Natasha M. Copeland,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-13844 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P