alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibits
EXHIBIT  32.2

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection  with  the  annual  report  of  Hyperdynamics  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kent P.
Watts,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

Date:  October  13,  2005          By:   /s/  Kent  P.  Watts
                                         --------------------
                                         Kent  P.  Watts
                                         Chief  Financial  Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of SCOLR Pharma, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:

To
my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
|-------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|               |  |  | 
|March 29, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard M. Levy                                 
|Date           |  |  |  |     |  | Richard M. Levy,                                    
|               |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
# Official Journal L 1/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 1 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 663 January 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 1

English edition

Legislation

Volume 663 January 2023

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1 of 21 December 2022 approving non-minor amendments to the product specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Salers’ (PDO)) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2 of 21 December 2022 repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 761/2014 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1 of 21 December 2022 approving non-minor amendments to the product specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Salers’ (PDO))

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2 of 21 December 2022 repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 761/2014 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# IMMC.EESC-2021-04238-AC.ENG.xhtml.EESC-2021-04238-00-00-AC-TRA-EN.docx

| OPINION |
| --- |
| European Economic and Social Committee |
| Cross-border infrastructure through the Channel Fixed Link - 

  Extension of period of validity |
| _____________ |
| Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2020/2222 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the cross-border infrastructure linking the Union and the United Kingdom through the Channel Fixed Link


  [COM(2021) 402 final – 2021/0228(COD)] |
| |
| TEN/753 |

OPINION

European Economic and Social Committee

Cross-border infrastructure through the Channel Fixed Link - 

  Extension of period of validity

_____________

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2020/2222 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the cross-border infrastructure linking the Union and the United Kingdom through the Channel Fixed Link

[COM(2021) 402 final – 2021/0228(COD)]

TEN/753

EN

Referral

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Referral | Council of the European Union, 15/07/2021


  European Parliament, 13/09/2021 |
| Legal basis | Articles 91(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society |
| Adopted at plenary | 22/09/2021 |
| Plenary session No | 563 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 239/1/5 |

Referral

Council of the European Union, 15/07/2021

Council of the European Union, 15/07/2021

European Parliament, 13/09/2021

European Parliament, 13/09/2021

Legal basis

Legal basis

Articles 91(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Articles 91(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section responsible

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Adopted at plenary

Adopted at plenary

22/09/2021

22/09/2021

Plenary session No

Plenary session No

563

563

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

239/1/5

239/1/5

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 563rd plenary session of 22 and 23 September 2021 (meeting of 22 September), by 239 votes to 1 with 5 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 563rd plenary session of 22 and 23 September 2021 (meeting of 22 September), by 239 votes to 1 with 5 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 22 September 2021

Brussels, 22 September 2021

Christa SCHWENG

Christa SCHWENG

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

_____________

_____________
p. 1



# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 53 ) ll-E-1 3 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:04

AM Sheet 53 of 264P. 2

CONTAC T REPOR T FOR

M PE S PROJEC T NO . N20 4 

# $''t-\h

Dat e Compan

y 9-27-9 3 RT M

System s (Glas-Craft ) Description : Contac t Mik e Keega n 

### Phon e (317) 875-559 2

Mr . Keega nindicate dtha t RTM System s make s mold s only , n o presses . Th e RTM mold s ar e ou t o f FR P materia l an dar e aroun

d$5,00 0 t o $10,000 . Presse s ar e no t normall y

usedwit hthes e molds , clamping i s don e b y C-clamps , bolts , o r hydrauli c lif t cylinders . Th e proces s i s typicall y 1 5 t o 2 0 percen t slowe r tha n close dmoldin g wit hpresses , bu t perhap s $100,00 0 cheaper . Th e qualit y wa s als o mentione dt o be bette r wit hRTM tha nsprayup . d c
High-Risk Area Year Designated

DOD Weapon Systems Acquisition 1990

Acquisition and Program Management for DOE’s National Nuclear Security Administration and Office of Environmental 

Management 1990

Enforcement of Tax Laws 1990

Medicare Program and Improper Payments 1990

NASA Acquisition Management 1990

DOD Contract Management 1992

DOD Business Systems Modernization 1995

DOD Financial Management 1995

Ensuring the Cybersecurity of the Nation 1997

Strategic Human Capital Management 2001

Improving and Modernizing Federal Disability Programs 2003

Managing Federal Real Property 2003

Strengthening Department of Homeland Security IT and Financial Management Functions 2003

Strengthening Medicaid Program Integrity 2003

DOD Approach to Business Transformation 2005

National Flood Insurance Program 2006

Ensuring the Effective Protection of Technologies Critical to U.S. National Security Interests 2007

Funding the Nation’s Surface Transportation System 2007

Improving Federal Oversight of Food Safety 2007

Modernizing the U.S. Financial Regulatory System 2009

Protecting Public Health through Enhanced Oversight of Medical Products 2009

Resolving the Federal Role in Housing Finance 2009

Transforming EPA’s Process for Assessing and Controlling Toxic Chemicals 2009

USPS Financial Viability 2009

Management of Federal Oil and Gas Resources 2011

Limiting the Federal Government’s Fiscal Exposure by Better Managing Climate Change Risks 2013

Improving the Management of IT Acquisitions and Operations 2015

Managing Risks and Improving VA Health Care 2015

Improving Federal Management of Programs that Serve Tribes and Their Members 2017

U.S. Government’s Environmental Liability 2017

Government-wide Personnel Security Clearance Process 2018

VA Acquisition Management 2019

Emergency Loans for Small Businesses 2021

National Efforts to Prevent, Respond to, and Recover from Drug Misuse 2021

Unemployment Insurance System – New in 2022 2022

HHS Leadership and Coordination of Public Health Emergencies – New in 2022 2022

Strengthening Management of the Federal Prison System – New in 2023 2023
(see attached scope of accreditation for field(s) of inspection, including type, range, methods or procedures)

Print Date: 08/25/2011 Page 1 of 3

This is to signify that

NTA, INC.

305 N OAKLAND AVENUE

NAPPANEE, INDIANA 46550

Inspection Agency AA-682

Type A (Third-Party) Inspection Body

(Revised August 3, 2011)

has met the requirements of the IAS Accreditation Criteria for Inspection Agencies (AC98), has demonstrated compliance with 

ISO/IEC Standard 17020, General criteria for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection, and has been 

accredited, commencing September 22, 2009, to provide inspection services in the approved scope of accreditation.

Patrick V. McCullen C. P. Ramani, P.E.

Vice President President
NTA, Inc. AA-682

Type A (Third-Party) Inspection Body

(Revised August 3, 2011)

September 22, 2009

Commencement Date C. P. Ramani, P.E.

President

Print Date: 08/25/2011 Page 2 of 3

NTA, Inc. Phil Jones

305 N Oakland Ave. VP Operations

Nappanee, IN 46550 (574) 773-7975

FIELDS OF 

INSPECTIONS

TYPE AND RANGE OF

INSPECTIONS

INSPECTION METHODS

AND PROCEDURES

Building, plumbing, electrical, mechanical and

structural systems of modular factory-built

construction

In-plant and in-situ International Building Code, Chapter 17, Section 

1703.5; International Residential Code, Sections 

R104.4 and R109; and NTA Inspection Methods 

2.1, 3.1 and 4.1

Deck Board Span Rating and Handrail

Systems

In-plant NTA Inspection Method 8.1

Structural Insulated Panels In-plant NTA Inspection Method 14.1

Light Gauge and Cold-Formed Steel 

Structural Components

In-plant NTA Inspection Method 15.1

Wood-based building products-formaldehyde

emissions

In-plant California Code & Regulation Section 93120, Title 

17, NTA IM 31.1

Thermal and moisture barrier underlayment In-plant NTA IM 35.0
NTA, Inc. AA-682

Type A (Third-Party) Inspection Body

(Revised August 3, 2011)

September 22, 2009

Commencement Date C. P. Ramani, P.E.

President

Print Date: 08/25/2011 Page 3 of 3

FIELDS OF 

INSPECTIONS

TYPE AND RANGE OF

INSPECTIONS

INSPECTION METHODS

AND PROCEDURES

Adhesives In-plant NTA Inspection Method 22

Manufacturing in fields specified above Qualification and Follow up In-plant ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria AC304
#### Frank G. BRISENO and Cecelia Pequeno Briseno v. C. G. MOOTY, Hermanine Mooty and the Hanover Insurance Companies.

No. 61809.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 31, 1978.

In re: Frank G. Briseno and Cecelia Pe-queño Briseno, applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.

TATE, DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ., would grant.
Exhibit
23.2




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




To the
Board of Directors


Hyperdynamics
Corporation


(an
Exploration Stage Company)


Houston,
Texas





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 12, 2006 (File
No. 333-130976); the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2008 (File No. 333-149774); the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 23, 2008 (File No. 333-148287); and the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June
11, 2010 (File No. 333-167486), of our report dated September  28,
2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements as of and for the years
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and for the period from July 1, 2009 (inception of
exploration stage) through June 30, 2010, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Hyperdynamics Corporation.




/s/ GBH CPAS, PCGBH
      CPAS, PCwww.gbhcpas.comHouston,
      Texas





September
28, 2010
#### Augusta KEPHART and Edward Lester Kephart, her husband, Petitioners, v. Jack E. PICKENS and Nationwide Life Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Respondents.

No. 43430.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 30, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 3, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 271 So.2d 163.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
# C_2011298EN.01002802.xml

| 8.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/28

---

Action brought on 23 August 2011 — Dectane v OHIM — Hella (DAYLINE)

(Case T-463/11)

2011/C 298/53

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dectane GmbH (Leipzig, Germany) (represented by: P. Ehrlinger and T. Hagen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hella KGaA Hueck & Co. (Lippstadt, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 June 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 June 2011;

| — | Order the intervener to pay the costs including those incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the intervener to pay the costs including those incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘DAYLINE’ for goods in Class 11 — application No 7 070 238.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Hella KGaA Hueck & Co.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the national word mark ‘Ledayline’ for goods in Class 11.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Opposition Division’s decision and refusal to register the mark as a Community trade mark.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 as there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

---
#### Aaron Ernest DURHAM, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-447.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 28, 1970.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a judgment of conviction and sentence rendered against him upon his plea of guilty to the charge of robbery. By his sole point on appeal appellant challenges the legality of his sentence because it does not take into account or give him credit for the time he spent in jail awaiting trial. Appellant contends that the refusal of the court to credit against his sentence the time he spent in jail violates his constitutional right to the equal protection of the laws as guaranteed in the United States Constitution.

Appellant does not tell us, nor does the record reflect, the amount of time he was incarcerated in the county jail awaiting trial on the criminal charge placed against him. From the record it does appear, however, that appellant was charged with having committed the offense of robbery on February 25, 1969. This charge was made in an affidavit filed by the state attorney on February 26, 1969. Appellant was adjudged insolvent by order of the court rendered on March 27, 1969, at which time the public defender was appointed to represent him. The record reflects no further action taken in appellant’s case until he appeared before the court on October 6, 1969, in the company of his attorney and entered a plea of guilty. At that time the court deferred sentence pending a presentence investigation, after which appellant again appeared before the court on November 10, 1969, for sentencing. After disposing of the formalities the court adjudged appellant guilty and sentenced him to a term of imprisonment for 99 years in the state prison.

From the foregoing chronological order of events it would appear that presuming appellant was arrested and placed in jail on the day he was charged with having committed the offense of robbery, he would have been incarcerated awaiting trial from February 25, 1969, to November 10, 1969, a period of approximately 8j4 months. In view of the fact that he has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment for 99 years, we find great difficulty in understanding how the failure of the court to credit appellant with 8yá months of jail time is either relevant or prejudicial. Appellant’s *754contention is ill founded and must be rejected under the doctrine of De Minimis Non Curat Lex.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting- C. J., and WIGGINTON, and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the company's
audited financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,683,429
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              117,131,302
<ALLOWANCES>                              (10,611,268)
<INVENTORY>                                 10,052,114
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,539,135
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             123,646,274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     99,477,001
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    29,792,573
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,129,218)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               123,646,274
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,968,286
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,524,748
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            11,525,252
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,083,824
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,165,538)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,915,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,080,538)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,080,538)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.51)
        

</TABLE>