alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906


of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Friedman Industries,
Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ben Harper, Senior Vice
President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 15, 2004



| |                  
| | -----------------
| | By /s/ BEN HARPER
| |                  
| | Name: Ben Harper 

| |        |                                                      
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------
| | Title: | Senior Vice President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer
#### Joe Allen CARLISLE v. GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 54511.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 5, 1974.

In re: Joe Allen Carlisle applying for Certiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Ouachita. 291 So.2d 449.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.

DIXON, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Massey Energy Company (the
Company) for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don L. Blankenship, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Don L. Blankenship               
|Don L. Blankenship                   
|Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
|President                            
|                                     
|August 4, 2008
#### Irvin MORGAN, Appellant, v. Carlton ANDERSON, Jr., Appellee.

No. 71-26.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 17, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 21, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Ben Harper, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Qof Friedman Industries, Incorporated;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

          b) [intentionally omitted per SEC release 33-8238]

          c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

          d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

          a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:  November 14, 2007 /s/  BEN HARPER Senior Vice President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer
#### Paul TOPOOZIAN, Appellant, v. Sam KANNER, Appellee.

No. 66-1102.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 3, 1967.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 6, 1967.

Green & Hastings and Irma R. Feder, Miami, for appellant.

William R. Alvin, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Cormier v. Williams, 148 Fla. 201, 4 So.2d 525; McGinley v. Chancey, Fla.1953, 70 So.2d 357; Travis v. Blackmon, Fla.App. 1963, 155 So.2d 698; Gavel v. Girton, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 10.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In
connection with the Annual Report of Hyperdynamics Corporation (Hyperdynamics),
on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Kent P. Watts, Chief Executive Officer of
Hyperdynamics, does hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
September 30, 2008





By:
            /s/
      Kent P. WattsKent
      P. WattsChief
      Executive Officer
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00227-CV

Melden & Hunt, Inc.

v.

East Rio Hondo Water Supply

On appeal from the

197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2015-DCL-00497-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 17, 2015.
# Official Journal C 231/9 Se

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 231 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 519 September 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 231

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 519 September 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 231/01 | Report from the Commission on the European Community SAFA Programme (Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircraft) (Aggregated Information — Report — 1 January to 31 December 2007)

   (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2008/C 231/01

Report from the Commission on the European Community SAFA Programme (Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircraft) (Aggregated Information — Report — 1 January to 31 December 2007)

   (1)

(Aggregated Information — Report — 1 January to 31 December 2007)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2008/C 231/02 | Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

2008/C 231/02

Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover)

s3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 808 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 808

                  For the relief of James B. Stanley.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1993

   Mr. Johnston of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of James B. Stanley.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.

    (a) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any 
money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $400,577 to James B. 
Stanley.
    (b) Basis.--The payment required by subsection (a) shall be to 
compensate James B. Stanley for the physical, psychological, and 
economic injuries sustained by him as a result of the administration to 
him, without his knowledge, of lysergic acid diethylamide by United 
States Army personnel in 1958.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

    The payment made pursuant to section 1(a) shall be in full 
satisfaction of all claims James B. Stanley may have against the United 
States for--
            (1) the injuries received by him as described in section 1; 
        and
            (2) for any injuries received by him subsequent to his 
        discharge from the United States Army that are the result of 
        the injuries described in section 1.

SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.

    James B. Stanley shall not be eligible for any compensation or 
benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs or the Department of 
Defense for any injury received by him as described in section 1.

SEC. 4. LIMITATION OF ATTORNEYS' OR AGENTS' FEES.

    It shall be unlawful for an amount of more than 10 per centum of 
the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid to or received by any 
attorney or agent of James B. Stanley for any service rendered in 
connection with the payment made by this Act. Any person who violates 
this section shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be subject to a 
fine in the amount provided in title 18, United States Code.

                                 <all>
```
#### RESERVE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. Luther James DAILEY, Appellee.

No. 70-736.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 20, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. R OB ER T DANNY C ARM ONA-LOPEZ, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-50226

D.C . No. 3:13-c r-03821-LAB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Larry A. B urns, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 14, 2016 ** B e fore : B EA, WATFORD, a nd FR IEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. R obe rt Da

nny C a rm ona -Lope za

ppe a l s from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt and c ha lle nge s the 70-m o n th se nte nc e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for posse ssion of he roin a nd m e t ham phe tam ine with inte nt to distribute ,



# FIL ED JUN 20 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).in viola

tion of 21 U.S.C . § 841(a )(1). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . C arm ona -Lope z c onte nds tha t be c a use the gove rnm e nt did not prove , nor did he a d m it, tha t he knowingly

or inte ntiona lly

posse sse d a

sc he dule I or II c ontrolle d substa

nc e , the distric t c ourt e rre d in im posing a se nte n c e gre ate r tha n one y e a r. C arm ona -Lope z ’ s a

rgum e nt is fore c l ose d by

our de c ision in Unite d State s v . J e ffe rson , 791 F.3d 1013 (9th C i r. 2015), c e rt. de nie d , 136 S. C t. 1473 (2016). The re , we he ld tha t a de fe nda nt’ s knowle dge of drug ty pe is not a

n e le m e nt of the offe nse tha t the gove rnm e nt m

ust prove for a

m andatory

m i nim um se nte nc e to a

pply . Se e id. at

1016, 1019. W

h ile J e ffe rson involve d the im

porta tion sta tute , 21 U.S.C . § 960, there a soning of tha t c a se is a pplic a ble he re be c a

use Se c tion 841 is “ struc tura l ly ide ntic a l ” to se c tion 960. Se e J e ffe rson , 791 F.3d a

t 1017 n.4. M ore o v e r, J

e ffe rson a ffirm e d long-sta nding pre c e de nt holding tha t, unde r both sta

tute s, knowle dge of drug ty pe is not a

n e le m e nt of the offe nse . Se e , e .g., Unite d State

s v . C arranza , 289 F.3d 634, 644 (9th C i r. 2002). Unde r J e ffe r son , the gove rnm e nt wa s not re quire d to prove that C arm o na -Lope z kne w what ty pe of drug he posse sse d in orde r to trigge r the 20-y e ar stat utory m a xim

um unde r 21 U.S.C . § 841(b)(1)(C ). AFFIRM E D.
1 4 - 5 0 2 2 6 2
# C_2013312EN.01S00301.xml

| 26.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/s3

---

NOTICE

On 26 October 2013, in Official Journal of the European Union C 312 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — 32nd complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0567. USA GYMNASTICS INC d/b/a USA GYMNASTICS v. JANE DOE.

This Court granted the application for interlocutory appeal, filed by USA

Gymnastics, Inc., of the trial court's order denying its motion for summary judgment.

After a thorough consideration of the case, including our review of the entire record,

we have determined that the trial court did not err. Accordingly, we conclude that the

application for interlocutory appeal was improvidently granted, and we vacate our

order granting the application and dismiss the appeal. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,

Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

April 18, 2017

04/18/2017
Request for Information FAA-2016-3774 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Huey: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA-2016-3774). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to

process your petition.

Per the Notice to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 Petitioners Regarding 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, part 107 letter posted to your docket, we have reviewed your original request and found 

you will be able to operate under part 107 without further relief (Tier 1). Your petition will be closed 

and you will be able operate in accordance with part 107 on the effective date of August 29, 2016). 

However, we have identified a request to conduct operations outside of the United States. In addition to 

the applicable regulations of the foreign country, operators of U.S.-registered aircraft will need to seek

relief from the provisions of Part 91, Subpart H of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations to 

conduct operations outside of the United States.

Please confirm your intention to pursue operations outside of the United States as a comment to your

docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information is submitted, please save your tracking number 

and submit your tracking number along with the information submitted to the docket via e-mail to

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the

information described above by 9/16/16. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket 

without notifying you further.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 9:33 AM 

To: Craig@CraigHueyPhotography.com

Request for Information FAA-2016-3774 Page 1 of 1

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&... 9/2/2016
## Before the United States Department of Transportation 

# Washington, DC December 14, 2010

Essential Air Service at GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASK A Docket OST-2002-13983 under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et.seq.
This document contains Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd.'s response to Order Requesting Proposals 2010-11-2. Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. is pleased to submit this proposal to provide essential air transportation at Grand Island, Nebraska.

The proposal contemplates the use of 19 seat Beechcraft 1900D airliner equipment. Questions and comments may be referred to: Michael O. Matthews Chief Financial Officer Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. 1022 Airport Parkway Cheyenne, WY 82001 (307) 432-7000 Per the instructions in the Order, this proposal represents Great Lakes final and only proposal.The service patterns and schedule times are designed specifically to connect with our codeshare partners (Frontier and United Airlines), along with interline connections to other carriers serving our Denver hub.

# Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. Annual Compensation Requirements for Essential Air Service at 

### Grand Island, Nebraska

(at 98 percent completion) Three Round Trips to Denver Departures: 1,840 Block Hours: 2,698 Revenue Passenger Miles: 5,074,000 Available Seat Miles: 12,026,240
Operating Revenues: Passengers 14,750 psgrs at $132.98 $1,961,455

Other: (at 0.62% of passenger revenue) $12,161 Total Operating Revenues: $1,973,616
Operating Expenses: Direct: Aircraft and Hull Insurance $338,710 Fuel and Oil $1,332,939 Flying Operations $459,038 Maintenance $627,753 Total Direct Expenses: $2,758,440 Total Indirect Expenses: $1,025,791 Total Operating Expenses: $3,784,231 Operating Loss ($1,810,615) Profit Element (5.0% of Total Operating Expenses) $189,212 Annual Compensation Requirement: $1,999,827 Representative Schedule Flt # Freq Flow Schedule Time Equip 5154 123456 GRI-DEN 0800-0832 92 BE1 5180 12345 DEN-GRI 0958-1222 84 BE1 5180 12345 7 GRI-DEN 1232-1304 92 BE1 5183 1234567 DEN-GRI 1344-1608 84 BE1 5183 12345 7 GRI-DEN 1618-1650 92 BE1 5155 12345 7 DEN-GRI 2040-2304 84 BE1
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael BALLARD.

No. 61907.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Michael Ballard applying for supervisory writs. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 706 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 706

                  For the relief of Charles R. Laurie.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 1993

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Charles R. Laurie.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That Charles R. Laurie, of Cleveland, Ohio, shall be deemed to have 
retired under section 377(a) of title 28, United States Code, on the 
date on which he completes 2 years of recall service as a magistrate 
judge under section 636(h) of title 28, United States Code.

                                 <all>
```