alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 927 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 927

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania as the 
                     National Aviary in Pittsburgh.






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 927

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
 To designate the Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania as the 
                     National Aviary in Pittsburgh.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Pittsburgh Aviary in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is designated as 
the ``National Aviary in Pittsburgh''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or 
other paper of the United States to the aviary referred to in section 1 
is deemed to be a reference to the ``National Aviary in Pittsburgh''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 13, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
EXHIBIT 12

		     FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
			  COMPUTATION OF RATIOS



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
											       Three Months Ended
												 March 31, 1998  
											     (Millions of Dollars)


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<S>                                                                                                  <C>
Earnings, as defined:
  Net income ..............................................................................          $ 107
  Income taxes ............................................................................             54
  Fixed charges, as below .................................................................             54

    Total earnings, as defined ............................................................          $ 215

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest expense ........................................................................          $  50
  Rental interest factor ..................................................................              1
  Fixed charges included in nuclear fuel cost .............................................              3

    Total fixed charges, as defined .......................................................          $  54

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ........................................................           3.98




RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS

Earnings, as defined:
  Net income ..............................................................................          $ 107
  Income taxes ............................................................................             54
  Fixed charges, as below .................................................................             54

    Total earnings, as defined ............................................................          $ 215

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest expense ........................................................................          $  50
  Rental interest factor ..................................................................              1
  Fixed charges included in nuclear fuel cost .............................................              3

    Total fixed charges, as defined .......................................................             54

Non-tax deductible preferred stock dividends ..............................................              4
Ratio of income before income taxes to net income .........................................           1.50

Preferred stock dividends before income taxes .............................................              6

Combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends ......................................          $  60

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends .................           3.58
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I,
Howard S. Modlin, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer,
and I, William G. Henry, Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief
Financial Officer, each of General DataComm Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), do
each hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that:

         (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
December 31, 2005 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         This Certification accompanies this Form 10-QSB as an exhibit, but
shall not be deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the
Company or the certifying officer.

                                     /s/ Howard S. Modlin
                                     ---------------------
Date: February 14, 2006                Howard S. Modlin,
                                       Chairman of the Board, President and
                                       Chief Executive Officer

                                    /s/ William G. Henry
                                    ----------------------
                                    William G. Henry
                                    Vice President, Finance and Administration
                                    and Chief Financial Officer


                                       33
#### In re Bertha Mae HUFFMAN v. STATE. Ex Parte Bertha Mae Huffman.

77-182.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 14, 1978.

Robert T. Meadows, III and David B. Byrne, Jr., Montgomery, for petitioner.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Milton E. Belcher, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Court of Criminal Appeals, 360 So.2d 1038, on original déliverance, properly pre-termitted review of the defendant’s contention that remarks of the prosecutor in closing argument require reversal, because argument of counsel was not included in the record on appeal.

The record has now been supplemented under ARAP 10(f) and we have thoroughly reviewed it after hearing oral argument by the petitioner. We find no reversible error and, therefore, affirm the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

AFFIRMED.

All the Justices concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 914 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 914

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 20 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate certain segments 
  of the Red River in Kentucky as components of the national wild and 
             scenic rivers system, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Red River Designation Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) the natural, scenic, and recreational qualities of the 
        Red River in Kentucky are unique and irreplaceable resources; 
        and
            (2) the majority of the Red River corridor is within the 
        Red River National Geologic area, which contains sedimentary 
        rock formations unique to Kentucky and the United States, and 
        should therefore be preserved for public enjoyment.

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF RIVER.

    Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``( )(A) Red river, kentucky.--The 19.4-mile segment of the Red 
River extending from the Highway 746 Bridge to the School House Branch, 
to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture in the following 
classes:
            ``(i) The 9.1-mile segment known as the `Upper Gorge' from 
        the Highway 746 Bridge to Swift Camp Creek, as a wild river. 
        This segment is identified as having the same boundary as the 
        Kentucky Wild River.
            ``(ii) The 10.3-mile segment known as the `Lower Gorge' 
        from Swift Camp Creek to the School House Branch, as a 
        recreational river.
    ``(B) There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are 
necessary to carry out this paragraph.''.

SEC. 4. LIMITATION.

    Nothing in this Act, or in the amendment to the Wild and Scenic 
Rivers Act made by this Act, shall be construed as authorizing any 
acquisition of any scenic easement that without the consent of such 
landowner would affect any regular use of relevant lands that was 
exercised prior to the acquisition of such easement.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 18, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2008281EN.01S00301.xml

| 5.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-
91942, 33-91944, 33-91946 and 333-16405 of Renaissance Solutions, Inc. on Forms
S-8 of our report dated February 28, 1997 (which expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the accounting for an
acquisition as a pooling-of-interests) appearing in this Amendment No. 1 on Form
10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Renaissance Solutions, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1996.

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 14, 1997
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Certification of
CEO





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Frequency Electronics, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Martin
B. Bloch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/    Martin
      Bloch
                
                December
      15, 2009Martin
      B. BlochChief
      Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.




This
certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”).  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30119-30120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13808]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Recreational Angler Survey of Sea Turtle Interactions.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-xxxx.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular (request for a new information 
collection).
    Number of Respondents: 12,300.
    Average Hours per Response: 5 minutes each for angler intercept 
interviews and sea turtle incidental take capture forms.
    Burden Hours: 1,025.
    Needs and Uses: This request is for a new information collection.
    NOAA NMFS would like to conduct an intercept survey to assess the 
extent of interactions between recreational anglers on piers and other 
shore-based fishing structures, and sea turtles. This survey will also 
assess the feasibility of an intercept survey for this purpose in terms 
response rates and data collection. The survey will be administered on 
piers and other fixed structures nationwide, but focused within NOAA 
Fisheries Greater Atlantic Region and Southeast Region, and will survey 
approximately 36,000 individual recreational fishermen. The respondents 
will be verbally asked a series of questions, no longer than 5 minutes, 
and the interviewer will record answers. Members of the Sea Turtle 
Stranding and Salvage Network will also complete sea turtle incidental 
take capture forms when applicable.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: One time.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. 
Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections 
currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#602f2932213f3315020d091313090f0e200f0d024e050f104e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a3533283b25290f18171309091315143a151718541f150a541d150c">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to (202) 395-5806.


[[Page 30120]]


    Dated: June 22, 2018.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-13808 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 31.1**
I, Jack Friedman, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive    Officer of Friedman Industries, Incorporated, a Texas    corporation, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Friedman Industries, Incorporated;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

          b) [intentionally omitted per SEC release 33-8238]

          c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

          d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

          a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: August 12, 2005 /s/  JACK FRIEDMAN Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2013101EN.01000401.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/4

---

Order of the Court of 10 October 2012 — ara AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Allrounder SARL

(Case C-611/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - International registration designating the European Community - Figurative mark A with two triangular motifs - Earlier national word mark A - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion)

2013/C 101/07

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: ara AG (represented by: M. Gail, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent), Allrounder SARL (represented by: N. Boespflug, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 September 2011 in Case T-174/10 ara v OHIM — Allrounder (A with two triangular motifs), by which the General Court dismissed the action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 January 2010 (Case R 481/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between ara and Allrounder — Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1) — Figurative mark A with two triangular motifs — Opposition by the holder of the national word mark ‘A’ — Likelihood of confusion between two marks — Incorrect assessment of the distinctive character

ara

OHIM — Allrounder (A with two triangular motifs)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders ara AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ara AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 133, 5.5.2012.

1

---
#### John P. CORYA, Appellant, v. Dorothy G. CORYA, Appellee.

No. 70-993.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 16, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
0).1&21)0

3)4&1)5&)*50 0

667



,


6

6

,2089

6




7219:;,6

6,=









,6

6,




/


6




78301329

EPA003532
0

1

0

2

3

45+ 06 7

4


8 990

50&


	


0

0+0 0 7

2&
=/"2 8

82/%6>2

4

38$

8 67

1-.6?@6

EPA003533
#### Wilkes-Barre Hotel Company, Appellant, *v.*Hildebrand.

Argued March 6, 1934.

Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*John A. Gallagher,*and with him *Frank P. Slattery,*for appellant.

*61
      *Mitchell Jenkins,*of *Jenkins, Turner & Jenkins,*for appellee.

April 16, 1934:

Per Curiam,

The pleadings in this case are the same as appear in Wilkes-Barre Hotel Company v. H. 1ST. Bust, 113 Pa. Superior Ct. 58 and for the reasons given in the opinion filed in said case.

The order of the lower court is affirmed.
#### Marion Kay E. KOPLON, Appellant, v. Stanley SMITH et al., Appellees.

No. 71-879.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 13, 1972.

Rehearing Denied July 12, 1972.

Roy S. Wood, Jr., for appellant.

E. Randell Beider, Phillip A. Brook and Irwin Oster, Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

Appellant defendant has appealed from an entry of an amended final judgment granting specific performance of her contract to sell her home to appellee-plaintiffs. We find that the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment, as the appellant breached the contract for sale. Further, there is no evidence in the record to support appellant’s position that the instant property met the qualifications for the homestead exemption for forced sale. Article 10 § 4 Florida Constitution of 1968, F.S.A.

We have considered the record, briefs and arguments of counsel in the light of the controlling principles of law, and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated.

Affirmed.