alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF BERTHEL GROWTH AND INCOME TRUST I AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND THE AUDITED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,123,840
<SECURITIES>                                11,788,197
<RECEIVABLES>                                  178,716
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,316,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,682,062
<BONDS>                                      5,550,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,084,733<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               635,769
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               642,350
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              98,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,229,880)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,229,880)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (33,817)
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,263,697)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (404.49)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (404.49)<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Net Assets
<F2>Net Income per beneficial share is based on the weighted average number of
shares outstanding, which was 10,541 shares for the year ended December 31,
1999.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### FLIGHT SERVICE, INC., a New York corporation, d/b/a Sunstream Aviation in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. POMPANO FLYERS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-520.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 11, 1971.

William L. Ranaghan of Sullivan, Cochran, Ranaghan & Bailey, Pompano Beach, for appellant.

James R. Eddy, Pompano Beach, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed. F.A.R. 4.2(a), 32 F.S.A.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8209 

To amend the Bridgeport Indian Colony Land Trust, Health, and Economic 

Development Act of 2012 to remove the restriction on class II gaming 

on certain land in California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2020 

Mr. COOK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Bridgeport Indian Colony Land Trust, Health, 

and Economic Development Act of 2012 to remove the 

restriction on class II gaming on certain land in California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF CLASS II GAMING RESTRICTION. 

4 Section 2(d) of the Bridgeport Indian Colony Land 

5 Trust, Health, and Economic Development Act of 2012 

6 (Public Law 112–212) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘class II gaming or’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8209 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘those terms are’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘that term is’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. William Arthur SCOTT, Relator, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections of the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-1095.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 2, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas Corpus denied.
#### Isidoro OLIVERA, Appellant, v. Dennis BYRNE, Appellee.

No. 73-1230.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 6, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 12, 1997, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
CASH FLOWS FOR THE 28 WEEKS ENDED DECEMBER 12, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q, QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-12-1997
<CASH>                                       6,076,735
<SECURITIES>                                   500,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               71,440,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                   982,200
<INVENTORY>                                 62,778,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           150,276,847
<PP&E>                                     248,703,142
<DEPRECIATION>                             118,684,312
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             319,285,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      217,798,294
<BONDS>                                     22,359,526
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       612,282
<OTHER-SE>                                  73,295,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               319,285,578
<SALES>                                    503,930,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           503,930,120
<CGS>                                      464,271,573
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              464,271,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            40,006,216
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,954,862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,161,782)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,833,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,328,782)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,328,782)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.54)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**LEVAR LEONARD JONES,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 313 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the**  Unpublished Memorandum and Order **of the Superior Court at No. 1442 MDA 2014 exited March 31, 2015,**  affirming **the Order of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas at No.**  **CP-36-CR-0003302-1994 exited August 11, 2014** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 24th day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal**

**is** GRANTED **on the issue of whether Petitioner’s sentence violates the prohibition**

**against mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders announced by the Supreme**

**Court of the United States in** Miller v. Alabama **, 567 U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012).**

**As a result of the recent holding by that Court that** Miller **must be applied retroactively**

**by the States,** see Montgomery v. Louisiana **, 2016 WL 280758 (U.S. Jan. 25, 2016), the**

**Superior Court’s order is** VACATED **, and the case is** REMANDED **for further**

**proceedings consistent with** Montgomery

**.**

**To the extent necessary, leave is to be granted to amend the post-conviction**

**petition to assert the jurisdictional provision of the Post Conviction Relief Act extending**

**to the recognition of constitutional rights by the Supreme Court of the United States**

**which it deems to be retroactive.** See **42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(1)(iii). [313 MAL 2015] - 2** 

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this** 

**matter.**
#### Peter SIMMONS v. STATE.

No. 38975.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, L.L. C., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

AMAZON.COM INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, LLC, Defendants

- Appellees

______________________

2015

- 200 8

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:13

- cv

- 01608

- RGA, Judge Ri chard G. Andrews.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
W ILLIAM M. J AY , Goodwin Procter LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaint iff- appellant. Also represented by J ENNIFER A. A LBERT , S TEPHEN S CHREINER , C E L I ; D AVID Z IMMER , San Francisco, CA; D OUGLAS J. K LINE , Boston, MA; T IMOTHY R OBERT D E W ITT , 24IP Law Group USA, PLLC, Alexandria, VA.J OSEPH R. R E , Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, Irvine, CA, argued for defendant s-appellees. Also repr esented by J OSEPH S. C IANFRANI , K EN T N. S HUM , J EREMY A NGUS A NAPOL ; C OLIN B. H EIDEMAN , Seattle, WA; G ABRIEL B ELL , G REGORY G. G ARRE , J ONATHAN Y. E LLIS , Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC; J EFFREY H. D EAN , Amazon.com, Inc., Seattle, WA.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard an d considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (H UGHES , S CHALL , and S TOLL , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 7, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
# Official Journal C 257/21 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 257 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6621 July 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 257

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6621 July 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | OPINIONS |
| | Committee of the Regions |
| | 155th CoR plenary session, 24.5.2023-25.5.2023 |
| 2023/C 257/01 | Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on ‘Do no harm to cohesion – A cross-cutting principle contributing towards cohesion as an overall objective and value of the EU’ | 1 |
| 2023/C 257/02 | Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on preparing for and dealing with crises: strengthening the resilience of the Union, its regions and cities | 6 |
| 2023/C 257/03 | Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on the mid-term review of the Multiannual Financial Framework: the local and regional perspective | 12 |
| 2023/C 257/04 | Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on zero long-term unemployment: the local and regional perspective | 18 |
| 2023/C 257/05 | Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on the legislative framework for sustainable food systems | 23 |

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

OPINIONS

Committee of the Regions

155th CoR plenary session, 24.5.2023-25.5.2023

2023/C 257/01

Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on ‘Do no harm to cohesion – A cross-cutting principle contributing towards cohesion as an overall objective and value of the EU’

1

2023/C 257/02

Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on preparing for and dealing with crises: strengthening the resilience of the Union, its regions and cities

6

2023/C 257/03

Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on the mid-term review of the Multiannual Financial Framework: the local and regional perspective

12

2023/C 257/04

Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on zero long-term unemployment: the local and regional perspective

18

2023/C 257/05

Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on the legislative framework for sustainable food systems

23

---

| | III   Preparatory acts |
| --- | --- |
| | Committee of the Regions |
| | 155th CoR plenary session, 24.5.2023-25.5.2023 |
| 2023/C 257/06 | Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on the Interoperable Europe Act | 28 |

III   Preparatory acts

Committee of the Regions

155th CoR plenary session, 24.5.2023-25.5.2023

2023/C 257/06

Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on the Interoperable Europe Act

28

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONs PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Precision, Aerospace Components, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Andrew S. Prince, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge::



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





| |  |  | /s/  Andrew S. Prince
Andrew S. Prince             
| |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------
| |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Date:  September 21, 2007
Additional TSD's Bill Maxwell to: Cortney_Higgins 03/04/2011 05:18 PM Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Jeb Stenhouse

Cortney --

Here are some additional TSDs.

Thanks.

Section 5.3 Coal to Gas Retrofit v3.docx New documentation on coal-to-gas switching.

TSD_Coal-to-Gas Conversions_to OMB 03-04-11.doc TSD on fuel switching.

Planned and Projected Retirements.xlsx List of unit retirements (a) before the base case is modeled, (b) modeled in the base case, and (c) modeled in the policy case. Note that we had previously listed 20 GW of planned retirements; this was a copy error. The actual planned retirement capacity is 11.4 GW. This issue does not affect any regulatory materials already in interagency review (it was implemented correctly in the modeling). 3 GW of this retiring capacity is based on information available in EIA Form 860 (2009). The remaining planned retirements were identified through external sources and verified by EPA using proprietary and publically available information. "2015 Base Retirements" and "2015 ToxR Retirements" identify all units projected to close in the IPM 2015 base case and Proposed Toxics Rule case, respectively.

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450
Exhibit 32









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-Q of Florida Public Utilities Company (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), we, John T. English, Chief Executive Officer and George M. Bachman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/John T. English

John T. English

Chief Executive Officer

August 12, 2009





/s/George M. Bachman

George M. Bachman

Chief Financial Officer

August 12, 2009
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Harold F. Pyle, III, certify that:
*1.* I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofMetromedia International Group, Inc.; *2.* Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport; and *3.* Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this quarterly reportfairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report, *4*.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
*a)* designed such disclosure control and proceduresor caused such disclosure controls and procedure to bedesigned under our supervision to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared; *b)* evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisquarterly report, our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation; and *c)* disclosed in this quarterly report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by this quarterlyreport that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
*5.* The registrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):
*a)* all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlsover financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and *b)* any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.   Date: June 17, 2004   /s/ HAROLD F. PYLE, III   Harold F. Pyle, III *Executive Vice President Finance,* *Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer* *(Principal Financial Officer)*
59
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4406

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAVID HEATH DOVE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Joseph Robert Goodwin,

District Judge. (CR-04-62)

Submitted: March 3, 2006 Decided: March 29, 2006

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory J. Campbell, CAMPBELL LAW OFFICES, Charleston, West

Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, Acting United States

Attorney, W. Chad Noel, Assistant United States Attorney,

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

David Heath Dove appeals his eighty-four month sentence

imposed following a guilty plea for two counts of distribution of

cocaine, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 841 (2000). We affirm. 

On appeal, Dove contends that the sentence imposed by the

district court erroneously relied on facts that he did not admit

to, in violation of his Sixth Amendment rights. After United

States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), courts must calculate the

appropriate guideline range, consider the range in conjunction with

other relevant factors under the guidelines and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

(2000), and impose a sentence. If a court imposes a sentence

outside the guideline range, the district court must state its

reasons for doing so. United States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d 540, 547

(4th Cir. 2005). This remedial scheme applies to any sentence

imposed under the mandatory guidelines, regardless of whether the

sentence violates the Sixth Amendment. Id. (citing Booker, 125 S.

Ct. at 769). This court should review a sentence imposed pursuant

to § 3553 to determine whether it is reasonable. Booker, 125 S.

Ct. at 764-67. 

In sentencing Dove, the district court expressly treated

the sentencing guidelines as advisory, considered the factors

listed in § 3553(a), and sentenced Dove within the properly
*

The statutory maximum for § 841 is twenty years. See 18

U.S.C. § 841 (2000).

- 3 -

calculated guidelines range, and below the statutory maximum* for

the offense. Accordingly, we conclude Dove’s sentence was

reasonable. See Hughes, 401 F.3d at 546-47 (noting after Booker,

sentencing courts should determine the sentencing range under the

guidelines, consider the other factors under § 3553(a), and impose

a reasonable sentence within the statutory maximum). We therefore

affirm Dove’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to incorporation by reference in the following
registration statements on Forms S-8 of Datastream Systems, Inc., of our reports dated September 12, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Datastream Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, which reports appear
in the December 31, 2005, annual report on Form 10-K of Datastream Systems, Inc.:





|     |  |                    
|---- |  | -------------------
|Form |  | Registration Number
|S-8  |  | 333-00314          
|S-8  |  | 333-00080          
|S-8  |  | 333-03579          
|S-8  |  | 333-37655          
|S-8  |  | 333-50395          
|S-8  |  | 333-50397          
|S-8  |  | 333-50399          
|S-8  |  | 333-57055          
|S-8  |  | 333-79085          
|S-8  |  | 333-81663          
|S-8  |  | 333-43980          
|S-8  |  | 333-43982          
|S-8  |  | 333-59320          
|S-8  |  | 333-99145          
|S-8  |  | 333-107431         

/s/ KPMG LLP

Greenville, South Carolina

February 27, 2006