alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Advantage Marketing
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31,
2003 (the "Report"), I, Reggie Cook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated: April 29, 2004              REGGIE B. COOK
                                   Reggie B. Cook
                                   Chief Financial Officer
256 La. 909

#### Dorothy CRAKER v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 50944.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 9, 1970.

In re: Allstate Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Iberia. 239 So.2d 184.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                    Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



     I, Christopher M. Rasmussen, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer), certify that this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained herein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Gateway Energy Corporation and
its subsidiaries for the periods presented.


Date:  August 22, 2005                      /s/  Christopher M. Rasmussen
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Christopher M. Rasmussen
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 (Principal Accounting Officer)
#### Peter Patrick LONGLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-952.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 6, 1973.

PER CURIAM.'

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 715 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 715

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to extend the prohibitions 
 against assaulting certain Federal officers and employees to State or 
local officials assisting in the enforcement of Federal criminal law at 
                    the request of a Federal agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1993

 Mr. Fields of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to extend the prohibitions 
 against assaulting certain Federal officers and employees to State or 
local officials assisting in the enforcement of Federal criminal law at 
                    the request of a Federal agency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State and Local Law Enforcers 
Protection Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. TITLE 18 AMENDMENT.

    Section 111 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting ``, or any 
        designated non-Federal official,'' before ``while engaged in''; 
        and
            (2) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting ``, or any 
        designated non-Federal official,'' before ``on account''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) As used in subsection (a) of this section, the term 
`designated non-Federal official' means a State or local official 
assisting Federal officers or employees in the enforcement of Federal 
criminal law, at the request of a Federal agency.''.

                                 <all>
```
1 United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

February 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________________

No. 06-10153

__________________________

In Re: ROBERT JAMES NEVILLE,

Movant.

___________________________________________________

On Motion for Authorization to File

Successive Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus in the United States District Court

Before the Northern District of Texas

___________________________________________________

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robert James Neville moves pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2) for authorization to file a

successive petition for writ of habeas corpus. He asserts that Atkins v. Virginia

, 536 U.S. 304 (2002)

and Roper v. Simmons

, 543 U.S. 551 (2005) created a new rule of constitutional law, made

retroactive by the Supreme Court, making the execution of mentally ill persons unconstitutional. No

such rule of constitutional law was created, however, by either Atkins or Roper

. See, e.g., In re

Woods , 155 F. App’x. 132, 136 (5th Cir. 2005) (declining to grant a successive habeas petition to

consider the defendant’s alleged mental illness because the new constitutional rule created in Atkins

does not cover mental illness). He, therefore, cannot satisfy the requirements as set forth by AEPDA1 Twenty years ago, Ford v. Wainwright established that the Eighth Amendment prohibits the

execution of the insane. 477 U.S. 399, 410 (1986). Neville, however, does not assert that he is insane.

2 These affidavits do not address whether Neville has a mental illness. These affidavits were

prepared for the Texas state court proceedings in which Neville argued that he was mentally retarded.

The Texas court found that he failed to make a prima facie case of retardati on and, therefore, denied

his motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus. In his briefs to this court, Neville no longer argues

that he is mentally retarded, but rather now claims mental illness.

2 needed to grant authorization to file a successive habeas petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2). 1

In addition, Neville does not present a prima facie case that he is mentally ill. He puts forward

only two pieces of evidence. First, he points to the testimony of a medical doctor presented during

the punishment phase of Neville’s trial. The doctor testified that Neville has lupus, which can make

him act erratically and irrationally. Second, Neville points to several affidavits submitted by Neville’s

former counsel. These attorney s attest that they believe that Neville has mental deficiencies and that

they believe that Neville might be mentally retarded. 2 Neither the doctor’s testimony regarding

Nev ille’s lupus nor his former attorneys’ impressions of his mental state constitute “a sufficient

showing of possible merit to warrant a fuller exploration by the district court.” In re Morris

, 328 F.3d

739, 740 (5th Cir. 2003) (internal quotation omitted).

Therefore, we DENY Neville’s petition to file a successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus

and DENY Neville’s motion for a stay of execution.
A 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 3/15/2022 | DOCUMENT NO. 604148 | Page 1 of 1 | PUBLIC

__________________________________________ 

PUBLIC 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

HomeAdvisor, Inc., a corporation, )

 d/b/a Angi Leads, ) Docket No. 9407 

 d/b/a HomeAdvisor Powered By Angi, )

 ) 

Respondent. ) 

__________________________________________) 

ORDER DESIGNATING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

Pursuant to authority vested in the Federal Trade Commission and delegated to the Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, 

IT IS ORDERED that D. Michael Chappell, Chief Administrative Law Judge, be, and 

hereby is, designated and appointed to take testimony and receive evidence in this proceeding 

and to perform all other duties authorized by law. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: March 14, 2022
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50141

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN LOPEZ-SALAZAR, also known as Martin

Esparza-Perez, also known as Juan Salazar Perez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-1975

--------------------

Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan LopezSalazar raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8

U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
257 La. 166

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Adam A. LAWRENCE.

No. 51019.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1970.

In re: Adam A. Lawrence applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ denied. No perfected bill of exceptions is in the record. See, Articles 843, 844, and 845 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; State v. Richardson, 220 La. 338, 56 So.2d 568; State v. Foret, 245 La. 70, 156 So.2d 606; State v. Green, 245 La. 1081, 162 So.2d 573.

Moreover, there is no error patent on the face of the record.
#### James Lee BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43350.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 22, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 3, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 271 So.2d 779.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### William B. MONDRY, Appellant, v. Alice Anne MONDRY, Appellee.

No. 73-623.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 25, 1973.

Prohibition denied.
259 La. 705

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Richard FALLIN.

No. 51696.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1971.

In re: Richard Fallin applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J. does not participate.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Arthur Andersen LLP has represented to G&K Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries that
its review was subject to Arthur Andersens quality control system for the U.S.
accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards and that
there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the
review and availability of national office consultation. Availability of
personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen is not relevant to this
review.

G&K Services, Inc.



By:      /s/ Jeffrey L. WrightJeffrey L. Wright
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer)
Calendar No. 296

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 898

AN ACT

To authorize the Air Force Memorial Foundation to

N

or its environs.establish a memorial in the District of Columbia

OVEMBER 18 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Placed on the calendar
II

Calendar No. 296

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 898

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 18 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To authorize the Air Force Memorial Foundation to establish

a memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Air Force Memorial Founda5 tion is authorized to establish a memorial on Federal land

6 in the District of Columbia or its environs to honor the

7 men and women who have served in the United States Air

8 Force and its predecessors.
2

•HR 898 PCS

1 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMO2 RATIVE WORKS.—The establishment of the memorial shall

3 be in accordance with the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide

4 standards for placement of commemorative works on cer5 tain Federal lands in the District of Columbia and its en6 virons, and for other purposes’’, approved November 14,

7 1986 (40 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).

8 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.

9 The Air Force Memorial Foundation shall be solely

10 responsible for acceptance of contributions for, and pay11 ment of the expenses of, the establishment of the memo12 rial. No Federal funds may be used to pay any expense

13 of the establishment of the memorial.

14 SEC. 3. DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.

15 If, upon payment of all expenses of the establishment

16 of the memorial (including the maintenance and preserva17 tion amount provided for in section 8(b) of the Act re18 ferred to in section 1(b)), or upon expiration of the author19 ity for the memorial under section 10(b) of such Act, there

20 remains a balance of funds received for the establishment

21 of the memorial, the Air Force Memorial Foundation shall

22 transmit the amount of the balance to the Secretary of
3

•HR 898 PCS

1 the Treasury for deposit in the account provided for in

2 section 8(b)(1) of such Act.

Passed the House of Representatives November 16,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 20735 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee

v. M AK EB A D EH RO N TH O M AS , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 4: 03- C R

- 330- 7

B ef ore K IN G , JO L L Y , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e att orney app oi n t ed to represent M ak eba D eh ron T h om as ha s m oved f o rl e av e t o w i t h draw a n d has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A nder s v. C a lif o rn ia , 3 86 U
. S. 7 38 ( 19 67 )
. Thom as ha s no tf i l e d a r e s po ns e . O ur i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December

15, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7589 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish term limits 

for the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency 

of Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2020 

Mr. KATKO (for himself, Mr. LANGEVIN, and Mr. GALLAGHER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Reform, and 

Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish 

term limits for the Director of the Cybersecurity and 

Infrastructure Security Agency of Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cybersecurity and In5 frastructure Security Agency Director and Assistant Di6 rectors Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7589 IH

1 SEC. 2. CISA DIRECTOR TERM LIMITATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 2202 of 

3 the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 652) is 

4 amended by— 

5 (1) redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph 

6 (3); and 

7 (2) inserting after paragraph (1) the following 

8 new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(2) TERM.—Effective with respect to an indi10 vidual appointed to be the Director by the President, 

11 by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 

12 after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, 

13 the term of office of such an individual so appointed 

14 shall be five years, and such an individual may not 

15 serve more than two terms. The term of office of the 

16 individual serving as the Director as of such date of 

17 enactment shall be five years beginning on the date 

18 on which the Director began serving.’’. 

19 (b) AMENDMENT RELATING TO QUALIFICATIONS

20 FOR CERTAIN CISA ASSISTANT DIRECTORS.—The Home21 land Security Act of 2002 is amended— 

22 (1) in subparagraph (B) of section 2203(a)(2) 

23 (6 U.S.C. 653(a)(2)), by striking ‘‘President without 

24 the advice and consent of the Senate’’ and inserting 

25 ‘‘Secretary’’; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7589 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (B) of section 2204(a)(2) 

2 (6 U.S.C. 654(a)(2)), by striking ‘‘President without 

3 the advice and consent of the Senate’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘Secretary’’. 

5 (c) AMENDMENT TO POSITION LEVEL OF CISA DI6 RECTOR.—Subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 5, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in section 5313, by inserting after ‘‘Admin9 istrator of the Transportation Security Administra10 tion.’’ the following: 

11 ‘‘Director, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Se12 curity Agency.’’; and 

13 (2) in section 5314, by striking ‘‘Director, Cy14 bersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 888 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 888

              To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 1993

   Mr. Fields of Texas (for himself and Mr. Bonilla) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Merchant Marine 
                             and Fisheries

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER.

    Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1539) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(k) Sole Source Aquifer.--This Act does not apply to the taking 
or jeopardy of an endangered species or threatened species if the 
taking or jeopardy results from the modification of a water habitat 
located in or fed by a sole source aquifer designated under the Safe 
Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.).''.

                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

      ( print page 28847)    

# TIME AND DATE:

Tuesday, June 26, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

* * * * *

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Laura E. Sinram,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2018-13445 Filed 6-19-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P