alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Garment Capitol Associates
June 30, 2002

                                        Exhibit 99(1)

                Garment Capitol Associates

           Chief Executive Officer Certification
                Pursuant to Section 906
           of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

	The undersigned Peter L. Malkin is signing this Chief
Executive Officer certification as a Partner* in Garment Capitol
Associates("Registrant") to certify that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Registrant for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2002(the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d));
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Registrant.

Dated:  August 20, 2002
                                By /s/ Peter L. Malkin
                                Peter L. Malkin
                                Partner in Garment Capitol
                                Associates




*Registrant's organizational documents do not provide for a Chief
Executive Officer or other officer with equivalent rights and
duties.  As described in the Quarterly Report, Registrant is a
partnership with three Partners who act as agents for investor
participants.  Accordingly, this Chief Executive Officer
certification is being signed by the Partner in Registrant with
the longest term of service.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 23-3271

___________________________ 

United States of America

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Andre Darrell Jones, Jr.

 Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern

____________ 

Submitted: February 14, 2024

Filed: February 20, 2024

[Unpublished] 

____________ 

Before SHEPHERD, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

After violating the conditions of supervised release, Andre Jones, Jr. received 

a 14-month prison sentence. His counsel, who seeks permission to withdraw, 

suggests the sentence is procedurally and substantively flawed. In a pro se filing, 

Jones argues it is also illegal.
-2- 

We conclude otherwise. There was no procedural error because the record 

establishes that the district court1 relied on only the stipulated violations, correctly 

calculated the advisory range, and explained the upward variance. See United States 

v. Krzyzaniak, 702 F.3d 1082, 1085 (8th Cir. 2013) (reviewing for plain error when 

the defendant did not object and considering the whole sentencing record). It also 

shows that Jones waived any challenge to the length of the sentence by expressly 

“agree[ing] to the 14 months.” See United States v. Campbell, 764 F.3d 874, 878 

(8th Cir. 2014) (explaining that a “defendant cannot complain that the district court 

gave him exactly what his lawyer asked” (citation omitted)). 

Finally, the sentence is legal because it falls below the statutory maximum. 

See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (setting a two-year limit for class C felonies). We 

accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel permission 

to withdraw.

______________________________

1

The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa.
#### ISAAC R. SMITH, Executor of GARRET NEWKIRK *vs.*PATRICK CAMPBELL.

An acknowledgment of a debt, though made to a third party, will take it out of the act of limitation.

Action of assumpsit, on two promissory notes, made July 22, 1812, for $167 74, and $167 14, payable at six, and nine months. Pleas, non-assumpsit, and statute of limitation.

The plaintiff proved that the defendant, within the time of limitation, spoke to a thiril person to buy .the notes up for him, and said they had not been paid.

*Mr. Bates,*for defendant.

An acknowledgment to take a case out of the act of limitation, must be made to a party holding the debt, and a declaration to a third person will not have that effect. It must be consistent with, indeed it is the substitute for a new promise to pay. The English doctrine is now, that the action is founded on the *new*promise; thatxthe effect of it is not merely to revive the old cause of action, which is to repeal the statute ; but it gives a new cause of action, on which the suit is brought. Though our courts have heretofore, as the English courts did once, held the acknowledgment to revive the old promise, they would now hold with the recent and more reasonable doctrine, that the acknowledgment is a new promise. If so, it must be made to a party interested. A mere declaration to a third party having no interest, will have no .effect to take the case out of the statute.

*381
      *Patterson,*for plaintiff.

*Bates,*for defendant.

*The Court*

charged the jury, that if they had satisfactory evidence of an acknowledgment by Patrick Campbell, within six years, of the existence of the debt, as a subsisting demand, founded on these notes, though made to a third person, not the holder of the notes, and -though not amounting to a promise to pay, the action was not barred, and the plaintiff was entitled to recover.

Verdict for plaintiff.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 709 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 709

  Entitled, the ``California-Mexico Border Drug Trafficking Reduction 
                                 Act''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1993

 Mr. Cunningham (for himself, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Royce, and 
Mr. Doolittle) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  Entitled, the ``California-Mexico Border Drug Trafficking Reduction 
                                 Act''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTRICTIONS ON LAND LOCATED ALONG THE UNITED STATES-MEXICO 
              BORDER IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--In order to carry out the purposes of section 
287(a)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1357(a)(3)), 
the Attorney General shall take such action as is necessary to--
            (1) acquire a permanent easement for the United States 
        extending 50 feet outwards along the length of the United 
        States-Mexico border in the State of California for the purpose 
        of erecting and maintaining a security fence and access road; 
        and
            (2) establish a 500 foot setback located along the length 
        of the border described in paragraph (1) for the purpose of 
        restricting any development within such setback.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 106 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 106

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                           May 5, 1994.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 20) to amend title 5, United States Code, to restore to Federal 
civilian employees their right to participate voluntarily, as private citizens, 
in the political processes of the Nation, to protect such employees from 
improper political solicitations, and for other purposes. The first reading of 
the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against the bill and 
against its consideration are waived. General debate shall be confined to the 
bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Post Office and Civil 
Service. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under 
the five-minute rule and shall be considered as read. No amendment shall be in 
order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 
this resolution. Each amendment may be offered only in the order printed and by 
the named proponent, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the 
time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and 
an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment except as specified in the 
report, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the 
House or in the Committee of the Whole. At the conclusion of consideration of 
the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 
with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**PC MALL, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of PC Mall, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Frank F. Khulusi, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely forpurposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

This Certification has notbeen, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.

 

March 16, 2009

 

 
| /s/ Frank F. Khulusi    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Frank F. Khulusi        |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Gerald SUTLIFF and Paul Lowman, Relators, v. Harold VANN, Circuit Judge in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-268.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 5, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Mandamus dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1125

REGINALD L. FRAZIER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MAUREEN DEMAREST MURRAY; HENRY C. BABB, JR.,JAMES LEE BURNEY; DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-168-4-BO) Submitted: August 31, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald L. Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Norma Smithwick Harrell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Frazier v. Murray , No. CA-96-168-4-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Harlan E. ORR and Myrtle L. Orr, husband and wife, Appellants, v. John W. WISE, otherwise known as John Wise, and Lois G. Wise, husband and wife, Appellees.

No. 68-556.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

May 28, 1969.

Julian D. Clarkson, of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, Fort Myers, for appellants.

Charles L. Bigelow, Jr., Fort Myers, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants file a timely appeal from a final decree entered by the chancellor below in favor of appellees.

The trial judge heard all of the evidence, which was conflicting, and resolved such conflicts against the appellants.

*778We have carefully read the record on appeal and studied the respective briefs of the parties and find that there is competent, substantial evidence which accords with logic and reason to support the final decree appealed. Under these circumstances the final decree must be

Affirmed.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, TT., concur.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Friendly IceCream Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended March 28, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, John L. Cutter, as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, andPaul V. Hoagland, as Executive Vice President of Administration and ChiefFinancial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)              The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | By:                             | /s/ JOHN L. CUTTER                                                      |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:                           | John L. Cutter                                                          |
|   | Title:                          | Chief Executive Officer and President                                   |
|   | Date:  April 26, 2004 |
|   |                            |                                                                    |
|   |                            |                                                                    |
|   | By:                             | /s/ PAUL V. HOAGLAND                                                    |   |
|   | Name:                           | Paul  V. Hoagland                                                       |
|   | Title:                          | Executive Vice President of Administration and  Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Date:                           | April 26, 2004                                                          |
|        |                                 |                                                                         |        |  |  |  |

 

----
# Official Journal L 316I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 316I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 658 December 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 316I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 658 December 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2397 of 8 December 2022 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/2398 of 8 December 2022 implementing Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo | 7 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2397 of 8 December 2022 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/2398 of 8 December 2022 implementing Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

7

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
## fa

## ·~odd 110{/VIC/{l· { 

### lf5 5-e-fv/U-- 

### fv

## h~rru.t Q!c{x 

### -/J: JO!S- ;I.. -4- () 

### sf ,;HJ/3- ocf36
# Official Journal L 84/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 84 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5126 March 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 84

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5126 March 2008

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2008/231/CE |
| | * | Commission Decision of 1 February 2008 concerning the technical specification of interoperability relating to the operation subsystem of the trans-European high-speed rail system adopted referred to in Article 6(1) of Council Directive 96/48/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2002/734/EC of 30 May 2002
  (notified under document number C(2008) 356)

   (1) | 1 |
| | | 2008/232/CE |
| | * | Commission Decision of 21 February 2008 concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘rolling stock’ sub-system of the trans-European high-speed rail system
  (notified under document number C(2008) 648)

   (1) | 132 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

DECISIONS

Commission

2008/231/CE

*

Commission Decision of 1 February 2008 concerning the technical specification of interoperability relating to the operation subsystem of the trans-European high-speed rail system adopted referred to in Article 6(1) of Council Directive 96/48/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2002/734/EC of 30 May 2002
  (notified under document number C(2008) 356)

   (1)

(notified under document number C(2008) 356)

1

2008/232/CE

*

Commission Decision of 21 February 2008 concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘rolling stock’ sub-system of the trans-European high-speed rail system
  (notified under document number C(2008) 648)

   (1)

(notified under document number C(2008) 648)

132

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to the Guideline of the European Central Bank of 1 August 2007 on monetary, financial institutions and markets statistics (recast) (ECB/2007/9) (OJ L 341, 27.12.2007) | 393 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to the Guideline of the European Central Bank of 1 August 2007 on monetary, financial institutions and markets statistics (recast) (ECB/2007/9) (OJ L 341, 27.12.2007)

393

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 900

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the appointment

of an additional district judge for the District of Idaho.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 16, 1993

Mr. LAROCCO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for

the appointment of an additional district judge for the

District of Idaho.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the item relating to Idaho in the table contained in

4 section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended

5 by striking ‘‘2’’ and inserting ‘‘3’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS INDUSTRIES, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JUNE 30, 2000, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME,
CASH FLOWS AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,077
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,062
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,701
<INVENTORY>                                     20,554
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,126
<PP&E>                                         115,640
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 168,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,895
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,921
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   168,167
<SALES>                                         34,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,415
<CGS>                                           33,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  190,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   740
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,415
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    293
<INCOME-TAX>                                       103
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                190
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       190
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>