alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification**

I, Elizabeth S. Buie, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the BA Master Credit Card Trust II;

2.     Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period            covered by this annual report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4.     I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that servicing            agreement in all material respects; and

5.     The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar            procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon.

Date: September 15, 2008

  By:/s/ Elizabeth S. Buie                            

  Name: Elizabeth S. Buie

  Title: Senior Vice President

  (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
March 6, 2003




Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

Gentlemen:

We have read Item 4 of Form 8-K dated March 1, 2003 of INTAC
International, Inc., related to the resignation of King
Griffin & Adamson P.C. to allow its successor entity KBA
Group LLP to be engaged as INTAC International, Inc.'s
independent accountants and are in agreement with the
statements contained in Item 4 (a) paragraphs (1), (2), (4)
and (5) therein.

                              Very truly yours,



                              KING GRIFFIN & ADAMSON P.C.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Friendly Ice Cream Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended July 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George M. Condos, as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Paul V. Hoagland, as Executive Vice President of Administration and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        |   | By:    |                                                                                                    |  /s/ GEORGE M.  CONDOS |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|   |   | Name:  | George M. Condos                                                                                        |
|   |   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal   Executive Officer)                                   |
|   |   | Date:  | August 3, 2007                                                                                          |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                    |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                    |
|   |   | By:    |                                                                                                    |  /s/ PAUL V.  HOAGLAND |
|   |   | Name:  | Paul V. Hoagland                                                                                        |
|   |   | Title: | Executive Vice President of Administration and Chief  Financial Officer (Principal Financial   Officer) |
|   |   | Date:  | August 3, 2007                                                                                          |
|        |        |        |                                                                                                         |                             |  |

 

----
#### CONTINENTAL CON-DEV COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Carlton A. SMITH and Florence E. Smith, his wife, et al., Appellees.

No. 2662.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 22, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Culver Smith, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### C. W. GISCH v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 46718.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 6, 1972.

W. Rayford Jones, Gulfport, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Timmie Hancock, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

PATTERSON, Justice:

C. W. Gisch appeals to this Court from a conviction by the Circuit Court of Pearl River County of the manufacture (growing) of marijuana. He was sentenced to three and one-half years in the state penitentiary and fined $1250.

We have considered all the assignments of error and find them to be without merit. There being no error in the record and the verdict being supported by competent evidence, the conviction must be affirmed.

Since the conviction occurred prior to the enactment of Senate Bill No. 1957 of the Regular Legislative Session of 1971, more specifically Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated section 6831-74(f) (Supp. 1971), the cause is remanded for resentencing in accord with the above provision.

Affirmed and remanded for resentencing.

RODGERS, P. J., and SMITH, ROBERTSON and SUGG, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.01

            GENERAL EMPLOYMENT ENTERPRISES, INC.
            OPERATIONAL VICE PRESIDENT BONUS PLAN
 EFFECTIVE FOR FISCAL YEARS BEGINNING ON OR AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2004


Each regional vice president shall receive annually a bonus
amount equal to a percentage of his or her base salary in
effect during the bonus year.  The percentage to be used
shall be the sum of two bonus rates, determined as follows:

  1. Income bonus rate - The income bonus rate shall be 5%
     multiplied by the ratio of eligible pre-bonus income per
     $1,000,000 or fraction thereof.
  2. Income improvement bonus rate - The income improvement
     bonus rate shall be 20% multiplied by the ratio of the
     improvement in eligible pre-bonus income per $1,000,000 or
     fraction thereof.

The percentage for the two bonus rates combined shall not
exceed 100%.

For purposes of the bonus rate calculations, "eligible pre-
bonus income" means the combined income of the vice
president's region or regions for the Company's fiscal year,
before deduction of income taxes and before deduction of any
expense related to the vice president's bonus, which is in
excess of an annual threshold amount.  The Compensation and
Stock Option Committee of the Company's Board of Directors
(the "Committee") shall establish the annual threshold
amount for each regional vice president at the beginning of
the bonus year.  If the combined regional income for the
bonus year is less than the annual threshold amount,
eligible pre-bonus income shall be treated as "zero" for
that bonus year.

For purposes of calculating the income improvement bonus
rate, improvement means the amount of increase in eligible
pre-bonus income for the bonus year compared with the
eligible pre-bonus income for the immediately preceding
bonus year.  If the combined regional income for either
bonus year is less than the respective year's annual
threshold amount, eligible pre-bonus income shall be treated
as "zero" for that bonus year.  A decrease in eligible pre-
bonus income shall be treated as "zero improvement" for that
bonus year.

The Company's Chief Financial Officer shall perform the
annual bonus calculations under this plan.  The Company's
Chief Executive Officer shall advise each regional vice
president in writing of the terms of the plan, including the
annual threshold amount, at the beginning of the bonus year,
shall approve the annual bonus calculations, and shall
provide each regional vice president with a written
statement documenting the annual bonus calculations at the
end of the bonus year.  The Committee shall have the
authority to interpret the plan and to resolve disputes.

The Company shall pay the bonus to each regional vice
president annually, within 30 days following the completion
of the audit of the Company's consolidated financial
statements by its independent auditors.
<PAGE>
                  GATEWAY ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                            EXHIBIT 21--SUBSIDIAIRES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
          COMPANY                                                   STATE       PERCENT OWNED
-----------------------------------                               ----------  -----------------
<S>                                                               <C>          <C> 
Gateway Pipeline Co.                                                Missouri               90%

  Gateway Energy Marketing                                          Texas                 100%
  Venture Resources, Inc.                                           Texas                 100%

Fort Cobb Oklahoma Irrigation
  Fuel Authority, L.L.C.                                            Oklahoma               99%

Shoreham Gathering Company                                          Nebraska               80%

Ozark Natural Gas Company                                           Missouri              100%
</TABLE>
#### Clair KRASNER, Petitioner, v. Bernard KRASNER, Respondent.

No. 43361.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 24, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 757

To provide for the utilization of the most current census data in certain

laws related to the environment and public works.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1993

Mr. BACCHUS of Florida (for himself, Mr. GIBBONS, Mr. HUTTO, Mr. HASTINGS, Mrs. MEEK, Mr. JOHNSTON of Florida, Mr. DEUTSCH, Ms. BROWN

of Florida, Mr. SHAW, Mr. PETERSON of Florida, and Mr. GOSS) introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on

Merchant Marine and Fisheries and Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To provide for the utilization of the most current census

data in certain laws related to the environment and

public works.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Environment and Pub5 lic Works Fair Share Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. HUNTER SAFETY AND EDUCATION.

7 Section 4(b) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide

8 that the United States shall aid the States in wildlife-res-
2

•HR 757 IH

1 toration projects, and for other purposes’’, approved Sep2 tember 2, 1937, commonly known as the ‘‘Federal Aid in

3 Wildlife Restoration Act’’ (16 U.S.C. 669c(b)), is amended

4 by striking ‘‘decennial census for which figures are avail5 able, as certified by the Secretary of Commerce’’ and in6 serting ‘‘available estimates prepared by the Department

7 of Commerce’’.

8 SEC. 3. FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY.

9 (a) HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS.—Section

10 104 of title 23, United States Code, is amended—

11 (1) by striking ‘‘Federal census’’ in subsection

12 (b)(4) and inserting ‘‘estimates prepared by the

13 Department of Commerce’’;

14 (2) by striking subsection (b)(6); and

15 (3) by striking ‘‘census’’ in subsection (f)(2)

16 and inserting ‘‘estimates prepared by the Depart17 ment of Commerce’’.

18 (b) HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAMS.—Section 402(c)

19 of title 23, United Sates Code, is amended by striking

20 ‘‘Federal census’’ and inserting ‘‘estimates prepared by

21 the Department of Commerce’’.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 627

To deny funds to educational programs that allow corporal punishment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. OWENS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Education and Labor

A BILL

To deny funds to educational programs that allow corporal

punishment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION AGAINST CORPORAL PUNISH4 MENT.

5 Subpart 4 of part C of the General Education Provi6 sions Act is amended by adding at the end the following:

7 ‘‘PROHIBITION AGAINST CORPORAL PUNISHMENT

8 ‘‘SEC. 438A. (a) No funds shall be made available

9 under any applicable program to any educational agency,

10 institution, organization, or other entity that has a policy
2

•HR 627 IH

1 which allows an individual to inflict corporal punishment

2 or bodily pain upon a child as a form of punishment.

3 ‘‘(b) The prohibition described in subsection (a) does

4 not preclude an individual, within the scope of employ5 ment, from using and applying such amount of physical

6 restraint as may be reasonable and necessary—

7 ‘‘(1) to protect self, a child, or others from

8 physical injury;

9 ‘‘(2) to obtain possession of a weapon or other

10 dangerous object upon the person or within the con11 trol of the child; or

12 ‘‘(3) to protect property from serious damage.’’.

Æ
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 7, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

130657 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan LARRY LONG, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 130657 COA: 256593 Wayne CC: 03-303990-NI BRIDGEWOOD APARTMENTS, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we MODIFY the judgment of the Court of Appeals to remove the reference to MCL 554.139(1), which plaintiff did not raise, and to clarify that the trial court must determine whether plaintiff was an invitee, a licensee, or a trespasser. In all other respects, the application is DE NIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0531 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 7, 2006

Clerk
GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
                    EXHIBIT 99 - FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION


         The Private  Securities  Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe
harbor" for forward-looking  statements.  The Company's Form 10-K, the Company's
Annual  Report to  Shareholders,  this or any other Form 10-Q or any Form 8-K of
the Company or any other written or oral  statements made by or on behalf of the
Company may  include  forward-looking  statements  which  reflect the  Company's
current  views with respect to future events and  financial  performance.  These
forward-looking  statements  are  subject  to  certain  uncertainties  and other
factors  that  could  cause  actual  results  to  differ  materially  from  such
statements.  These uncertainties and other factors include,  but are not limited
to,  uncertainties  relating to economic conditions,  uncertainties  relating to
government and regulatory policies, uncertainties relating to customer plans and
commitments, the Company's dependence on the cable television industry and cable
television spending, signal security, the pricing and availability of equipment,
materials  and   inventories,   technological   developments,   the  competitive
environment  in which the Company  operates,  changes in the  financial  markets
relating  to  the  Company's  capital   structure  and  cost  of  capital,   the
uncertainties   inherent  in  international   operations  and  foreign  currency
fluctuations. The words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "project" and similar
expressions identify  forward-looking  statements.  Readers are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of
the date the  statement  was made.  The  Company  undertakes  no  obligation  to
publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise.
EXHIBIT 32.1



PC Mall, Inc.



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the annual report of PC Mall, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Frank F. Khulusi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



March 31, 2005



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ Frank F. Khulusi                    
|Frank F. Khulusi Chief Executive Officer
#### Arsenio BETHENCOURT, Petitioner, v. POOLE & KENT COMPANY and the Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 43814.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 10, 1973.

Petition denied.

CARLTON, C. J, and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ, concur.
#### AMERICAN BUILDINGS COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. Roy C. SAMPLEY, Jr., d/b/a Sampley Enterprises, Appellee.

No. 69-235.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 3, 1969.

Gibbons, Tucker, McEwen, Smith, Cofer & Tattb, Tampa, for appellant.

Yado, Keel & Nelson, Tampa, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of Peters v. E. O. Painter Fertilizer Co., 1917, 73 Fla. 1001, 75 So. 749; Ritch v. Adams, 1931, 102 Fla. 983, 136 So. 719; Permenter v. Bank of Green Cove Springs, Fla.App. 1962, 136 So.2d 377, and Sterling v. Haimowitz, Fla.App.1962, 141 So.2d 304.

HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Friendly Ice Cream
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Paul V. Hoagland, as Executive Vice President of Administration and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                      By: /s/ PAUL V. HOAGLAND
                          -----------------------------------------------------
                          Name:  Paul V. Hoagland
                          Title: Executive Vice President of Administration and
                                 Chief Financial Officer
                          Date: April 28, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Dana Craig GALLOWAY, Appellee.

No. 72-379.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 1, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 20, 1972.

Richard E. Gerstein, State’s Atty., and Richard Snyder, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellant.

Heiman & Crary and William A. Meadows, Jr., Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The state brings this interlocutory appeal in a narcotics possession case following the trial court’s granting of a defense motion to suppress evidence found during the inventory search of appellee’s automobile. The search was one step in a continuum of events that included appellee’s arrest for a traffic violation of a character which required the posting of a bond. When the appellee was in custody following his arrest the arresting officer requested a wrecker to remove appellee’s vehicle from the roadside. Before impounding the vehicle the officer made an inventory search of the car *54which revealed a bag of marijuana and appellee was charged with its possession.

The officer had a valid basis upon which to make the arrest and this gave him the authority to conduct the inventory search. State v. Ruggles, Fla.App.1971, 245 So.2d 692. We reverse the trial court’s ruling that the marijuana was obtained as a result of an illegal search and seizure on the authority of Godbee v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 441; Knight v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 900; Gagnon v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 337; United States v. Pennington (5th Cir. 1971), 441 F.2d 249. Whereupon the order appealed from is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.