alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       76,533
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          12,403
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         1,936
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   3,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,012
<COMMON>                                         4,806
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        9,145
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             16,649
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  28,682
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        600
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            23,500
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               7,600
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  33,630
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   94,012
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       19,507
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               780
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       5,151
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       5,931
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          2,108
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  76
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   2,184
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           733
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,451
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          7
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    1,444
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           489
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          559
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           3,366
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
        

</TABLE>
#### Verne Peter DUBOIS, Appellant, v. Olga CRESPO et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1218.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 6, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; George Richardson, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### James Robert FRANKENBERRY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-982.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 7, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### Revised text on page 35 of section VI of SO2 NAAQS preamble Lydia Wegman to: Laity, James A., Mancini, Dominic J. 06/02/2010 05:15 PM Cc: Brian Doster, Dan Deroeck, Anna Wood, Kevin McLean, Tricia Crabtree, Charlotte Bertrand, Bridgid Curry Jim and Dom, Please find attached the language Jim and I just discussed. It is on page 35. Thanks.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 810 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 690
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 810

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 3 (legislative day, July 20), 1994

                                Received

                             August 5, 1994

       Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

           September 28 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                Reported by Mr. Biden, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                  For the relief of Elizabeth M. Hill.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Elizabeth M. Hill--
            (1) the sum of $6,780, and
            (2) interest on such sum--
                    (A) calculated at the rate determined in the manner 
                provided in subsections (a) and (b) of section 1961 of 
                title 28, United States Code, and
                    (B) payable for the period beginning on October 5, 
                1985, and ending on the date on which such sum is paid.
Such sum represents the amount that was recovered by the United States 
under Public Law 87-693 (76 Stat. 593; 42 U.S.C. 2651 et seq.) in 
satisfaction of its claim against a tortiously liable third person for 
the value of medical care and treatment the United States furnished to 
Elizabeth M. Hill, but would have been recovered by Elizabeth M. Hill 
if a timely request for a waiver of such claim had been submitted on 
her behalf.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY'S AND AGENT'S FEES.

    Not more than 10 percent of the sums appropriated by section 1 
shall be paid to or received by any agent or attorney for services 
rendered in connection with the claim described in such section. Any 
person who violates this section shall be fined not more than $1,000.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 2, 1994.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 690

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 810

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

                  For the relief of Elizabeth M. Hill.

_______________________________________________________________________

           September 28 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                       Reported without amendment
```
### Navigating to the guidelines hosting site.
!



"
 







#


$
%









%
#











	
		
&'())((	*	+
,5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,213XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU)LOH 1DPH DS	

		'-."/0$1"+$.+2$3333333333333333321,7('07$7(6 2)40(5,&$	5$/7(5#(:,6		6	
4

2
0
7+

7-+
 
)889:;.<+
7=!
4!
>-
9	
7

'
> 

9888?

><4.$+
=!
@02"."/$.$+"0$#/.+=!
33333333333333333  =
 .5 5$##$0 ?#4+A5/## B.-C/.0+
 
-4
+7?400$04 20 4-./D +
 
 - 4


  
  =
 . 5 5$##$0?#4+A5/## B .-C/.0 +
 
 - < ;5+
 
-4
+7?9	

	
400$04 20 4-./D +
 
 - 4


<4.$ + = 
 

 
   
   02"."/$.$+" = 
  0$#/. = * ),
 




!?-D+/'<4.$=.+
=!
-'


5
#
 


 
 % 
    9
 20+E&
*,*
,*,*
,*4,
!

 

 
20+E99*!,*
,*9,"








  
 
  ;   #
 
   
  
   

  "

F






5

 

$ 
 7



	 
! !

+
 
;
7

25
#

/=
      
 
  
8
8(5


 4 

 +
 
 -  - 07


9



!
!
 
!!




>88&>88


/= %
 
 
 
  
 

  
  !
%=

+
%




333
	?



 



4 >(   % =

 +
%

 

 
5<7
	

 

8
8(5


4
 
 






=!

=


 

 
=G

%






	
	

)0$#/. + =!
 
!  $   
  
    
! 
  
4




5
#
/=


+
 


 

=
%!!
!
 
7


9





=


 




=!
=




!




!!
  
 %   4 +%

 

 
 







!










#







!
%%









#

!!
	
		('9
(8

(
9*	+
,

%






 


 

 


 
!  !   



 


 




!


%%








2%


 	
 )
 20 &)
 &9 *
	, 
 
 




 




5



#




 
  
G!
 
   




G
!#






%
 
	

	
5














 





 
   !
  
 
 
  " ! 
  
 
 
 G!



!
8
8(5



 
 
  
 
  
'


! 




!
 <
 = 5
 #





 




 




4! 
 ./H/.0/ 
 
  
 ./<47


	
	




%+
 

%

888(5


4+%
G

+
 





!


=



 
G!

!
!
!
4



=

 
!


 
=
 
!
%


%

=

+% 

!



=




%
=



+%=-
0


=A
<%<I

8
8(5


J

K



!



G4!

<I
A
%%
 
 

8
8(5


 4 





 




 
%

F




!

%




"


J+
K 
 

  
 
 
 
 


 
 
 #
 !  
   
'
!#
!

!!



 




#




 
 

 

 
  %
  

 





 
!
L








#



<
=!

 

 
  
 
 

  

  
G
 
 +
  0
  


%!
!0
!

<
=




!
#
4


G


#

!








#






&	

	

   
 
 
 

   
 
  
  $  
 
  
 
 
 
 

I

!!
I


 


 


  
 

  +! 4




=
7


9

 
  

  
 
 

 J!K/4!4

!

%%!!
<#



/=5
#


4 


/=

 

 
 

<#





 
G


"


%

J5
'!!
F
MK5
#





%




%%

4



!!





J!NO!K4!#





!



A

#

/=5
#










<
=5
#
!

  <
 =  

  
 !
 






!
!






5
#



!
 

 
 
    
 

 !! 




%

5

 
F
!


	
	& ' )8 )& *	 + 
	,  "
 
 
 F  !  
 
   
 


! 




 !
G!


G
	
	

(4!



F





'4


0
+


G!



	
	 (8'999
998*	+

,*!!	"#$&
20&	 *
),@"	% 	20&)*
	),,4


 











G!

	
$ (&9 '9 &	 (8(
 *	 + 
)	,5
 
!








 




F
	
		('9 
(8
 
(
9 *	+ 
,  4!		  
 

 






! 



>J
,








!@9,  

 

  

  
  

 
 
 
 
  
    

 



K&
(
9$






 
 
 

 
 
 
  
 
  




!


4!


  
!

! 
 
 






=
 
















!
   
 
 !   
 















=




%
!
#
F









#
  = 


 !

!
8
8(5
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 86

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an income

tax credit for in-State contributions to congressional candidates.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. CLINGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

for an income tax credit for in-State contributions to

congressional candidates.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNAL REVENUE

4 CODE OF 1986 TO PROVIDE FOR A CREDIT

5 FOR IN-STATE CONTRIBUTIONS TO CONGRES6 SIONAL CANDIDATES.

7 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Subpart A of part IV of sub8 chapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of

9 1986 (relating to nonrefundable personal credits) is
2

•HR 86 IH

1 amended by inserting after section 23 the following new

2 section:

3 ‘‘SEC. 24. IN-STATE CONTRIBUTIONS TO CONGRESSIONAL

4 CANDIDATES.

5 ‘‘(a) GENERAL RULE.—In the case of an individual,

6 there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed

7 by this chapter for the taxable year an amount equal to

8 the total of contributions to candidates for the office of

9 Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resident

10 Commissioner to, the Congress, for the State of which the

11 taxpayer is a resident.

12 ‘‘(b) LIMITATIONS.—

13 ‘‘(1) MAXIMUM CREDIT.—The credit allowed by

14 subsection (a) for a taxable year shall not exceed

15 $100 ($200 in the case of a joint return under sec16 tion 6013).

17 ‘‘(2) VERIFICATION.—The credit allowed by

18 subsection (a) shall be allowed, with respect to any

19 contribution, only if such contribution is verified in

20 such manner as the Secretary shall prescribe by reg21 ulations.

22 ‘‘(c) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the

23 term ‘contribution’ has the meaning given that term in

24 section 301 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of

25 1971.’’.
3

•HR 86 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

2 (1) Section 642 of such Code (relating to spe3 cial rules for credits and deductions of estates or

4 trusts) is amended by adding at the end the follow5 ing new subsection:

6 ‘‘(j) CREDIT FOR CERTAIN CONTRIBUTIONS NOT AL7 LOWED.—An estate or trust shall not be allowed the credit

8 against tax provided by section 24.’’.

9 (2) The table of sections for subpart A of part

10 IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of such Code is

11 amended by inserting after the item relating to sec12 tion 23 the following new item:

‘‘Sec. 24. In-State contributions to congressional candidates.’’.

13 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

14 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply to

15 taxable years beginning after December 31, 1994.

Æ
----

(2004/C 88 E/0728)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0687/04

by Marcelino Oreja Arburúa (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(3 March 2004)

Subject:   Infringement of the principle of the freedom of movement of goods

Various dairy businesses in various Member States produce yoghurt which meets national legislation, either post-fermentation pasteurised, heat-treated or long-life, all of these companies export their yoghurts to Portugal and others could do so in future. The result is that the pasteurised yoghurts of the various Member States need to adapt to Portuguese legislation, which demands that the term ‘yoghurt’ be replaced by ‘dairy dessert’, which is completely foreign to the nature of the foodstuff in question. Calling the same product one thing in the exporting country, and another in the importing country gives rise, in this case, to various forms of indirect taxation which impede its movement: in the case of Spain, 5 % for the yoghurt product in Spain, and 19 % for the Portuguese ‘dairy dessert’, which thus constitutes a measure having equivalent effect. Furthermore, and taking due account of the constant and vast jurisprudence of the Court of Justice: Cassis de Dijon (CJ 120/78 of 20.02.1979), Smanor (CJ 298/87 of 14.07.1988), Deserbais (CJ 286/86 of 22.09.1988), Procureur du Roi v Dassonville (CJ 8/74 of 11.07.1974), REWE (CJ 120/76 of 20.02.1979), Rau (CJ 261/81 of 10.11.1982), or Commission v Germany (the beer case) (CJ 178/84 of 12.03.1987), I believe that the principle of mutual recognition of legislation of the country of manufacture is being straightforwardly violated, since it means that the marketing of the imported yoghurt product is more difficult and costly due to the extra expenditure on labelling and packaging, and that the consumer is also burdened by the fact that he may be confused by so generic a name as ‘dairy dessert’, and by a multilingual label in which different names to indicate the nature of the product are used in different languages.

Does the Commission therefore believe that Portugal is failing to meet one of the obligations laid down in the Treaty, violating the principle of the freedom of movement of goods and Article 5 and preliminary recitals 2, 6, 8 and 14 of Directive 2000/13/EC (1) on food labelling? If so, what is it going to do?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(21 April 2004)

According to the jurisprudence of the European Court, the compatibility of the Portuguese labelling requirements with article 28 of the EC Treaty will depend on the extent to which:

The Commission is examining the need to establish legislation on yoghurt and yoghurt-like products which includes the aspects mentioned by the Honourable Member.

Following that examination, which should be completed in the near future, where it is considered appropriate and necessary to establish additional legislation, the Commission will forward a proposal to the Parliament and to the Council.

----

(1)OJ L 109, 6.5.2000, p. 29.

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 6, 2016

s0829

Order 

Clerk

September 6, 2016

151948

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151948

COA: 324944

Oakland CC: 07-213264-FH

MICKEY HICKS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 20, 2015 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Gino P. NEGRETTI, as Administrator Ad Litem of the Estate of Alfredo Vicente, Deceased, and Alfredo Vicente, (Jr.), Appellants, v. Gloria VICENTE, Appellee.

No. 73-513.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 19, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6979

JERNARD AKINS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; HARRY G.

LAPPIN, Director; ASSOCIATE WARDEN OF EVANS

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; TYRONE ALLEN,

Associate Warden; ROBERT MCLAFFERTY, Special

Agent; STEVEN PRICE, Officer,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(3:04-cv-23200-MBS)

Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: October 2, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jernard Akins, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Jernard Akins appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents

of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), without

prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Akins

also appeals the district court’s order denying his subsequent Fed.

R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

orders. See Akins v. United States, 3:04-cv-23200-MBS (D.S.C.

filed Mar. 22, 2006 & entered Mar. 23, 2006; filed May 1, 2006 &

entered May 2, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit4(d)(1)**

 

**GATEWAYENERGY CORPORATION**

**SUBSCRIPTIONAGREEMENT**

 

**CommonStock**

 

Gateway Energy Corporation

One Allen Center

500 Dallas Street, Suite 2615

Houston, Texas 77002

 

The undersigned Philip A. Wilson (“Subscriber”)does hereby irrevocably agree to subscribe for and purchase 116,667 shares ofGateway Energy Corporation Common Stock at $0.30 per share, or $35,000 (the “SubscriptionPrice”). The undersigned and Gateway Energy Corporation (the “Company”)expressly agree that this Subscription Agreement shall be null and void unlessand until Josh H. Buterin places into a bank account of the Company the sum of$115,000 pursuant to a Gateway Energy Corporation Convertible Promissory Notedated September 27, 2004.  Upon thepayment of such amount by Josh H. Buterin, this Subscription Agreement shall befully enforceable, and payment of the Subscription Price into the same bankaccount of the Company shall be required.

 

Upon payment of the Subscription Price, theCompany shall issue to the undersigned the number of Shares specified in thefirst paragraph of this Subscription Agreement with an appropriate legendindicating that the securities have not been registered under the SecuritiesAct of 1933 and are resalable either pursuant to an effective registrationstatement or exemption from registration under Rule 144.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Subscriber has executedthis Subscription Agreement as of the 1st day of November, 2004.

 

 
| ** ** | **SUBSCRIBER**        |
|------------|-----------------------|
|       |                  |
|       |                  |
|       | /s/ Philip  A. Wilson |   |
|       | Philip A. Wilson      |
|            |                       |  |  |

 

 

Accepted this 1st day of November, 2004.

 

**GATEWAY ENERGY CORPORATION**

 

 
| By:    | /s/ John A.  Raasch       |   |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | John A. Raasch, President |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a- 14(a) /15d- 14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of G&K Services, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    By:
    /s/ Jeffrey L. WrightJeffrey L. Wright, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Director(Principal Financial Officer)
# Official Journal C 321/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 321 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5718 September 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 321

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5718 September 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 321/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| | European Court of Auditors |
| 2014/C 321/02 | Special Report No 12/2014 ‘Is the ERDF effective in funding projects that directly promote biodiversity under the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020?’ | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2014/C 321/03 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 3 |
| 2014/C 321/04 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 321/01

Euro exchange rates

1

European Court of Auditors

2014/C 321/02

Special Report No 12/2014 ‘Is the ERDF effective in funding projects that directly promote biodiversity under the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020?’

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2014/C 321/03

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

3

2014/C 321/04

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 321/05 | Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 4 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2014/C 321/05

Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

4

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN