alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 924

To designate certain lands in the State of North Carolina as wilderness,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 17, 1993

Mr. BALLENGER introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to

the Committees on Natural Resources and Agriculture

A BILL

To designate certain lands in the State of North Carolina

as wilderness, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Western North Caro5 lina Wilderness Protection Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION AND ADMINISTRATION.

7 (a) DESIGNATION.—In furtherance of the purposes of

8 the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131–1136), the following

9 lands in the State of North Carolina are hereby designated
2

•HR 924 IH

1 as wilderness and therefore as components of the National

2 Wilderness Preservation System:

3 (1) Certain lands in the Pisgah National For4 est, which comprise approximately 5,710 acres as

5 generally depicted on a map entitled ‘‘Lost Cove

6 Wilderness—Proposed’’ dated July 1990, which

7 shall be known as the Lost Cove Wilderness.

8 (2) Certain lands in the Pisgah National For9 est, which comprise approximately 7,140 acres as

10 generally depicted on a map entitled ‘‘Harper Creek

11 Wilderness—Proposed’’ dated July 1990, which

12 shall be known as the Harper Creek Wilderness.

13 (b) ADMINISTRATION.—Subject to valid existing

14 rights, the wilderness areas designated under this section

15 shall be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture

16 (hereafter in this Act referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) in

17 accordance with the provisions of the Wilderness Act gov18 erning areas designated by that Act as wilderness, except

19 that any reference in such provisions to the effective date

20 of the Wilderness Act shall be deemed to be a reference

21 to the date of enactment of this Act.

22 (c) MAP AND DESCRIPTION.—As soon as practicable

23 after enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall file a map

24 and a legal description of each wilderness area designated

25 under this section with the Committee on Natural Re-
3

•HR 924 IH

1 sources and the Committee on Agriculture of the House

2 of Representatives and with the Committee on Energy and

3 Natural Resources of the Senate. Each such map and de4 scription shall have the same force and effect as if in5 cluded in this Act, except that correction of clerical and

6 typographical errors in such legal description and map

7 may be made. Each such map and legal description shall

8 be on file and available for public inspection in the Office

9 of the Chief of the Forest Service, United States Depart10 ment of Agriculture.

Æ
**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Ben Harper, Senior Vice President-Finance andSecretary/Treasurer of Friedman Industries, Incorporated, aTexas corporation, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Friedman Industries, Incorporated;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, result of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

          b) [intentionally omitted per SEC release 33-8238]

          c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

          d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

          a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: February 13, 2004 /s/  BEN HARPER Senior Vice President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 871 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 871

  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a national 
    cemetery for veterans in Lake County or Porter County, Indiana.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1993

Mr. Visclosky introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a national 
    cemetery for veterans in Lake County or Porter County, Indiana.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish, 
in accordance with chapter 24 of title 38, United States Code, a 
national cemetery in Lake County or Porter County, Indiana, to serve 
the needs of veterans and their families.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.4



CERTIFICATION



I, Brandon H. LaVerne, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PCM, Inc.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|Date: April 28, 2016 | /s/
    Brandon H. LaVerne
|-------------------- | --------------------------
|                     | Brandon H. LaVerne        
|                     | Chief Financial Officer
#### Jeanette Hardayal, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[722 NYS2d 176]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated May 4, 2000, which denied her motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim against the defendant City of New York. The police accident report alone, without any evidence of further investigation by the City, was inadequate to apprise the City of the nature or severity of the injuries claimed (cf., *Matter of Continental Ins. Co. v City of Rye,*257 AD2d 573; *Matter of DeAngelis v County of Dutchess,*159 AD2d 706; *Wolf v State of New York,*140 AD2d 692). Furthermore, the plaintiff did not offer a valid excuse for her failure to timely serve a notice of claim *(see, Matter of Tineo v City of New York,*273 AD2d 397; *Matter of Ealey v City of New York,*204 AD2d 720; *Matter of Tricomi v New York City Hous. Auth.,*191 AD2d 447), and she offered no evidence to rebut the City’s demonstration of prejudice *(see, Gangloff v East Islip School Dist.,*240 AD2d 366, 367). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
This item contains materials that cannot be 

uploaded to the federal docket. A CD containing 

files submitted to EPA by Hogback Exploration 

with the extension .lic is available by contacting

docket staff via email at 

Docket_ORD@epamail.epa.gov
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0142

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

CHEYENE LEILANI – AMBER ZIELIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 5, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 28 2023

11/28/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0142
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERNALLY
PREPARED FOR 3 MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                              52
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,939
<ALLOWANCES>                                       778
<INVENTORY>                                      2,053
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,599
<PP&E>                                           3,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,231
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,053
<BONDS>                                          1,190
<COMMON>                                           739
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,297
<SALES>                                          2,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,551
<CGS>                                            2,024
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,188
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,083
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    24
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  76
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    204
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                204
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       204
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PERNELL R. ROBERTS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-0689

[July 17, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Daniel Arthur Casey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

20006268CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Elizabeth Follmer, 

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pablo Tapia, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant raises four issues on appeal. We find merit in only one; 

as to the other three, we affirm without discussion. As to the meritorious 

issue, the State has appropriately conceded error.

The defendant’s sentence on Count 1 included a twenty-five-year 

mandatory minimum term of imprisonment for actual possession or 

discharge of a firearm. However, he was not charged with actual 

possession or discharge of the firearm, and the jury did not make a specific 

finding in this regard. Additionally, the judgments for Counts 1 and 3 

incorrectly contain references to section 775.087, Florida Statutes (2020).

Vicarious liability will not substitute for actual possession or discharge 

of the firearm for this sentencing requirement. Squire v. State, 278 So. 3d 

153, 156 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). Here, there was no allegation, evidence, or 

jury finding of actual possession or discharge of the firearm by the 

defendant. Rather, through the allegations, evidence, and jury findings, 

there is no question the accomplice was the party who had actual 
2

possession of, and discharged, the firearm.

We, therefore, reverse the imposition of the twenty-five-year mandatory 

minimum sentence for Count 1. As with Squire, a resentencing hearing is 

not required. We remand with instructions to the trial court to 

ministerially amend (1) the judgment as to Counts 1 and 3 to delete the 

references to section 775.087, Florida Statutes (2020), and (2) the written 

sentence entered for Count 1 to delete the twenty-five-year mandatory 

minimum sentence.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Notes from Meeting with Environmental Technology Council

Attended by:

ETC Staff: David Case, James Williams

ETC Members: Scott Kuhn (Clean Harbors), Bob Garner (Veolia), Tom Baker (Veolia), 

Nick Maoloni (Ross Environmental), Steve Naylor (EnviroSAFE),

Armand Johnson, and others

EPA Staff: Kristin Fitzgerald, Jessica Young, Lisa Lauer

Date: October 20, 2011

EPA met with representatives and members of Environmental Technology Council (ETC) to 

discuss their comments on the Universal Waste proposal in more detail and to provide an update 

on the pharmaceuticals proposed rule.

ETC indicated that pharmaceuticals that are hazardous due to metal content have enough 

organics that they may be combusted.

ETC also discussed the intersection of RCRA and DEA regulations.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MACK DANIEL CORE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1411

[August 8, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Joseph Marx, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 50-1992-CF-006649-AXXX-MB.

Mack Daniel Core, Monticello, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
AFS-10-369-E 

August 24, 2010 

 Exemption No. 8775B 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-25092 

Mr. Glen F. Wattman 

Director, Office of Aviation Management 

U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Ave., SW. 

Washington, DC 20585 

Dear Mr. Wattman: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8775, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated August 5, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Wackenhut Services, Inc. (WSI), a contractor for the Department of Energy (DOE), 

for an exemption from § 91.209(a)(1) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) to allow the WSI to provide transportation of special response teams who will 

conduct night-vision-goggle lights-out training or actual security response for the DOE’s site 

security plan. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to DOE. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8775, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8775, as amended, to 

August 31, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8775, as amended, remain the same. This 

letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8775. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Lawrence Fields 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20

- 847 V

Filed: March 15, 2021

UNPUBLISHED

KALEE CAMBRAY, on behalf of S.C.

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Master Daniel Horner

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Causation

- In

- Fact; Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) Vaccine;
induration; abscess; scarring

Jerome A. Konkel, Samster, Konkel & Safran, S.C., Wauwatosa, WI , for petitioner.

Naseem Kourosh , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On July 13, 2020

, Kalee Cambray filed a petition on behalf of her minor daughter

S.C. for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that S.C. suffered
from abscesses and granulomas resulting from adverse effects caused by S.C.’s Haemophilus Influenzae Type B (HiB) vaccinations administered on July 14, 2017, September 13, 2017, and May 8, 2018 . Petit ion at 1

.

On March 15, 2021

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1 2 . Specifically, R espondent “ has concluded that S.C.’s indurations or abscesses and scar are compensabl e as a “caused

- in

- fact” injury under the Act. ” Id. at 10 . Respondent

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2 further agrees that “ the case was timely filed, that S.C. received the Hib vaccines in the
United States, and that the Hib vaccines that S.C. received are set forth in the Vaccine
Injury Table. In addition

. . . petitioner has satisfied the statutory requirement that S.C.’s injury lasted for at least six months, as required by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 11(c)(1)(D)(i). ” Id. (citations omitted).

In view of R es pondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Daniel T. Horner

Daniel T. Horner

Special Master
Congressionally Mandated Reports Submission Form 

Worksheet A: Report Submitted to Congress 

This worksheet can be used to identify required information before submitting a report to GPO via 

the Congressionally Mandated Reports Submission Portal.

Report Information (Required*) 

*Government Organization(s) Issuing the report:

*Report Title:

*Publication Date (MM/DD/YYYY):

*Is this a recurring report or one-time submission?

*What is the frequency this report will be submitted?

(e.g., Quarterly, Annual, Biennial, Completely Irregular)

Agency Report Identifier (E.g. “A129fa-adfdfZ"): 

*Subject Tags - Provide up to 5 Legislative Subject Terms from Congress.gov to describe the substance of

the report):

*Report due to House, Senate, or Both?

*Date Submitted to Congress (MM/DD/YYYY):

Executive Communication Information 

Reports submitted to the House and Senate are reported as Executive Communications (EC) in the

Congressional Record. Search House Communications and/or Senate Communications on Congress.gov 

and provide the following: 

Requirement Number (R): 

House Executive Communications Number (EC): 

Senate Executive Communications Number (EC): 1 
 

Committee Referral Information 

Congress during which the report was submitted: 

Committee(s) and/or Subcommittee(s): 

Reporting Requirement Information 

Reports to Be Made to Congress is prepared by the Legislative Resource Center and issued as a House 

Document each session of Congress. Please locate the requirement(s) for the report you are submitting in 

the most recent edition of Reports to be Made to Congress. 

*Nature of Report:

*Legislative Authority:

*When Expected to be Made:

2