alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 892 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 892

 To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to ensure the 
identification of the biological parents of each child who receives aid 
                  to families with dependent children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 1993

  Mr. Franks of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to ensure the 
identification of the biological parents of each child who receives aid 
                  to families with dependent children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Parental Responsibility Act''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN PAYMENTS TO STATES FOR AID TO FAMILIES WITH 
              DEPENDENT CHILDREN.

    (a) In General.--Section 403 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
603) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(o)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the 
Secretary shall reduce the amounts payable to any State under this part 
for any calendar quarter by--
            ``(A) 5 percent, if the parental identity percentage of the 
        State for the calendar quarter is less than 70 percent but not 
        less than 60 percent;
            ``(B) 7 percent, if the parental identity percentage of the 
        State for the calendar quarter is less than 60 percent but not 
        less than 50 percent;
            ``(C) 10 percent, if the parental identity percentage of 
        the State for the calendar quarter is less than 50 percent but 
        not less than 40 percent;
            ``(D) 15 percent, if the parental identity percentage of 
        the State for the calendar quarter is less than 40 percent but 
        not less than 22 percent; or
            ``(E) 20 percent, if the parental identity percentage of 
        the State for the calendar quarter is less than 22 percent.
    ``(2) As used in paragraph (1), the term `parental identity 
percentage of a State for a calendar quarter' means the percentage of 
dependent children who received aid during the calendar quarter under 
the State plan approved under this part whose biological parents have 
not been identified to the State agency referred to in section 
402(a)(3).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to payments for calendar quarters ending at least 1 year after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### CROSS AERO CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CHANDLER LEASING DIVISION PEPSICO SERVICE INDUSTRIES LEASING CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-1262.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 10, 1973.

Walters & Costanzo, Miami, for appellant.

John L. Britton, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On certain dates between August and December of 1968 the appellant, as lessee, and the appellee, as lessor, entered into several leases of industrial type equipment for terms of approximately five years. The lessee defaulted in payments thereunder, whereupon the lessor repossessed the equipment and established certain deficiency damages, for which the lessor sought recovery by this action. Summary judgment was entered in favor of the lessor, and the lessee appealed.

Based on certain stated theories of law, the appellant contends the plaintiff was not *476entitled to recover the claimed deficiency with reference to one of the leases, being a portion of the damages included in the judgment.

The judgment contained a recitation by the trial court on the basis of which the appellant’s contention on this appeal must be rejected, viz: “ * * * the Court having heard the stipulation between counsel for plaintiff and defendant as to certain facts not disputed, among those being that the defendant was in default of the lease attached to plaintiff’s complaint, and that the damages as claimed and delineated in the deficiency statement attached to plaintiff’s complaint properly represent plaintiff’s damages pursuant to the leases, ‡ s]i >{t *”*

On consideration of the record, and in view of that recitation in the judgment, we find no reversible error has been shown.

Affirmed.
House Calendar No. 29

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 153

[Report No. 103–61]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI

tions reported from the Committee on Rules.with respect to consideration of certain resoluAPRIL 21, 1993

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

House Calendar No. 29

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 153

[Report No. 103–61]

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to consideration

of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 21, 1993

Mr. DERRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect

to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the

Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule

2 XI for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to resolutions reported

5 on the legislative day of April 22, 1993, to provide for

6 the consideration or disposition of the bill (H.R. 1335)

7 making emergency supplemental appropriations for the
2

HRES 153 RH

1 fiscal year ending September 30, 1993, and for other pur2 poses, any amendment thereto, any conference report

3 thereon, or any amendment reported in disagreement from

4 a conference thereon.
# Official Journal L 89I/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 089I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 615 April 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 089I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 615 April 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/537 of 5 April 2018 amending for the 283rd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/537 of 5 April 2018 amending for the 283rd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Don Civgin, certify that:

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by  this quarterly report; 
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4.The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchnage Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant, and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingand the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordancewith generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation;and

d) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and 

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Don Civgin

Don Civgin
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 113

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to allow Members

to utilize the services of volunteers in their offices, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1993

Mr. MANZULLO (for himself and Mr. MCINNIS) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

allow Members to utilize the services of volunteers in

their offices, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That (a) rule XLV of the Rules of the

2 House of Representatives is amended—

3 (1) in clause 1 by striking ‘‘No’’ and inserting

4 ‘‘Except as provided by clause 5, no’’; and

5 (2) by adding at the end the following new

6 clause:

7 ‘‘5.(a) A Member may accept the services of any

8 number of volunteers to perform official duties of a min9 isterial nature assigned by that Member.
2

•HRES 113 IH

1 ‘‘(b) The Committee on House Administration shall

2 prescribe regulations to carry out this clause.’’.

3 (b) The regulations prescribed by the Committee on

4 House Administration to carry out clause 5 of rule XLV

5 of the Rules of the House of Representatives shall prohibit

6 the utilization by any Member’s office of the services of

7 any volunteer who is receiving compensation from any

8 other source for the time during which that individual is

9 volunteering his services to that Member.

Æ
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________ No. 97-4307

________________ United States of America, * Appellee, * v. * District Court for the Andrew M. Ja skiewicz, also known * as Andrew Maurice Hart, * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant, * John Doe, or current unknow n * occupants; Jane Doe, or current * unknown occupants, * Defendants. * * * Appeal from the United States * District of Nebraska
* *

*

________________ Submitted: November 2, 1998 Filed: November 6, 1998

________________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

________________ PER CURIAM.The Honorable William G. Cambridge, Chief Judge, United States District 1 Court for the District of Nebraska. 2 Andrew Mark Jask

iewicz a/k/a Andrew Maurice Hart appeals from the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in an action in ej ectment. Having carefully

1 reviewed the record and the parties' submissions, we conclude that the district court's judgment is correct. See8th Cir. R. 47B. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT
#### James H. BANKSTON v. Nina Faye Miller BANKSTON, a/k/a Mrs. Johnnie Joe Denny.

No. 61941.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Nina Faye Denny, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Caddo. 355 So.2d 58.

Writ denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**PC MALL, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of PC Mall, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Brandon H. LaVerne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

(2)        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

March 25, 2011

 
| /s/ Brandon H. LaVerne  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Brandon H. LaVerne      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
263 La. 989

#### Arthur PEMBRICK, Jr. v. CHARITY HOSPITAL OF LOUISIANA AT NEW ORLEANS.

No. 53034.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 21, 1972.

In re: Arthur Pembrick, Jr. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Louisiana Civil Service Commission. 268 So.2d 265.

Writ refused; we find no error of law in the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
**EXHIBIT 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, Frank F. Khulusi,certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Reporton Form 10-K of PC Mall, Inc.; and

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading

with respect to theperiod covered by this report.

 
| Date: April 29,  2008 |   | /s/ Frank F. Khulusi    |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                       |   | Frank F. Khulusi        |
|                       |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                         219,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,812,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                   250,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,023,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,838,500
<PP&E>                                       2,753,300
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,867,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,818,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,551,900
<BONDS>                                      9,305,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,811,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,109,800)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,818,100
<SALES>                                      2,266,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,266,600
<CGS>                                        1,919,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,919,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               429,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (132,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (132,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (132,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Pearson plc (the Company) for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Fallon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 27, 2014



/s/ John FallonJohn FallonChief Executive Officer
#### The DUBLIN COMPANY, a Florida corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company, a Connecticut insurance company, Appellants, v. THERMAL AIR FLO COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation, and Jack Parker Construction of Florida Corp. Number Two, a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 73-29.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 19, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 15, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 30448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13894]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Developmental Therapeutics.
    Date: July 9, 2018.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sharon K. Gubanich, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6195D, MSC 7804, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 408-9512, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#93f4e6f1f2fdfaf0e0d3f0e0e1bdfdfafbbdf4fce5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8dfcddad9d6d1dbcbf8dbcbca96d6d1d096dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 22, 2018.
Sylvia L. Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-13894 Filed 6-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jon F. HOGAN.

No. 61687.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1978.

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

Now into court comes the State of Louisiana through Assistant District Attorney, Abbott J. Reeves and defense counsel J. Hunter Bienvenu and with respect petitions the court to dismiss the application for writ of the above entitled captioned case filed February 28, 1978 for review of ruling in the 24th Judicial District Court. Amicable resolution of the question regarding compulsory process has been reached.
#### Cullen RAWLEY v. Betty Seals RAWLEY and Bogalusa Loan Corporation.

No. 61904.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Bobby Rawley, applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Washington. 357 So.2d 286.

Writ denied. Under the facts of this case, the result is correct.