alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Friendly IceCream Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 28, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Paul V. Hoagland, as Executive Vice President of Administrationand Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1)              The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | By:    |      /s/ PAUL V. HOAGLAND                      |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Paul V. Hoagland                                                        |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice President of Administration and  Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Date:  | October 23, 2003                                                        |
|        |        |                                                                         |        |  |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### Raymond Joseph GALLAGHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-419.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 8, 1974.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Bruce J. Daniels and Richard S. Power, Asst. Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie Bernard, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

WALDEN, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction of Delivery of Marijuana to Another, To-wit: J. Broussard.

We have reviewed the circumstantial evidence which led to the guilty verdict and conclude that it was insufficient as a matter of law. The evidence was inconclusive and equally consistent with innocence as it was with guilt. Pacetti v. State, 157 So.2d 445 (2nd D.C.A.Fla.1963).

To illustrate the lack of delivery, we accept the State’s version of the facts as follows :

> “Philip McCann, with the Broward County Sheriff’s Department, testified that the police observed a Cadillac, whose driver was later identified as J. Broussard, drive up and park at the residence under surveillance. Broussard and the passenger got out and were met by Appellant who walked up to them. The officers observed the three have a conversation while walking to the barn. Appellant and Broussard returned after only several minutes, and Broussard opened the trunk of the Cadillac. Appellant and Broussard then appeared to examine a package which Brous-sard took out of the trunk. Then they closed the trunk, were met by the passenger, and returned to the residence. The officer did not know what was in the package. The police executed their warrant, and the vehicle was searched. Marijuana was found in the trunk of the form of spillage. ‘(I)t appeared as though somebody had placed something down and it spilled over the sides of what it had already been in.’

> “Appellant has been observed earlier in the day stuffing some of the contents of the packages in the trailer into a green plastic bag. The trailer had more bundles in when the officers first saw Appellant open the trailer than when the picture of the trailer was taken around 11: 45 o’clock, at night when the arrest was made.”

While there is evidence of marijuana possession,1 there is none as concerns delivery.

The judgment of conviction as to Count Three of the information in question is reversed and the clause remanded with in*253structions to discharge appellant as concerns his conviction under this Count only.

Reversed and remanded.

MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur,

1

. Appellant was convicted of such possession in a separate count.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 882 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 882

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that charitable 
contributions of appreciated property will not be treated as an item of 
                            tax preference.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 1993

Mr. Andrews of Texas (for himself, Mr. Shaw, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Bacchus of 
    Florida, Mr. King, Mr. McCollum, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Solomon, Mr. 
       Sundquist, Mr. Gingrich, Mrs. Schroeder, Mr. Gillmor, Mr. 
Hochbrueckner, Mr. Bateman, Mr. Pickett, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Porter, 
Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Torkildsen, Mr. Blute, Mrs. Kennelly, Mr. 
Thomas of Wyoming, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Spratt, Mr. Upton, Mrs. 
    Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Emerson, Mr. Machtley, Mr. Neal of 
Massachusetts, Mr. Lewis of Florida, Mr. Frost, Mr. Matsui, Mr. Walsh, 
  Mr. Towns, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Jacobs, Mr. Williams, Mr. 
 Baker of Louisiana, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. McDermott, Ms. Norton, 
 and Mr. Mazzoli) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that charitable 
contributions of appreciated property will not be treated as an item of 
                            tax preference.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF TREATMENT OF CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS OF 
              APPRECIATED PROPERTY AS ITEM OF TAX PREFERENCE.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 57 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items of tax preference) is amended 
by striking paragraph (6) and by redesignating paragraph (7) as 
paragraph (6).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1991.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS OF GARAN,
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES ANNEXED HERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE

TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000039917
<NAME> GARAN, INCORPORATED
       
<S>                           <C>            <C>        
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS          6-MOS                  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             SEP-30-1998    SEP-30-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-1-1998     OCT-1-1997    
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1998    MAR-31-1998 
<CASH>                          5,472,000      5,472,000 
<SECURITIES>                   22,562,000     22,562,000 
<RECEIVABLES>                  21,904,000     21,904,000
<ALLOWANCES>                      518,000        518,000  
<INVENTORY>                    42,700,000     42,700,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               96,329,000     96,329,000
<PP&E>                         34,017,000     34,017,000
<DEPRECIATION>                 20,150,000     20,150,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                133,222,000    133,222,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          24,771,000     24,771,000
<BONDS>                         2,203,000      2,203,000
<COMMON>                        2,562,000      2,562,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0              0
<PREFERRED>                             0              0
<OTHER-SE>                    100,560,000    100,560,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  133,222,000    133,222,000
<SALES>                        41,098,000     78,809,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               41,098,000     78,809,000
<CGS>                          31,197,000     60,091,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  31,197,000     60,091,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 29,000         56,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 5,057,000      9,182,000
<INCOME-TAX>                    2,035,000      3,686,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0              0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0              0
<CHANGES>                               0              0
<NET-INCOME>                    3,022,000      5,496,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .59           1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .59           1.07

        

</TABLE>
AP9 R04-30-92 S:\FormsLib\Civil Bureau\Civil Courts & Post Judgment\Post Trial\Appeal Status Card Revised 01-18-2013

DATE: FEB. 23, 2015

 NOTICE OF APPEALS

ASSIGNMENT OF COURT THE COURT OF APPEALS

TO: 14TH COURT OF APPEALS 

From: Deputy Clerk: PHYLLIS WASHINGTON

 Chris Daniel, District Clerk

Harris County, T E X A S

CAUSE: 2013-05124B 334TH DISTRICT COURT

VOLUME PAGE OR IMAGE # 63039636

DUE DATE: 03-2-15 ATTORNEY TBN #00783581

NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO THE 14TH

DATE ORDER SIGNED: 10-29-14

MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL/REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF FACT; DATE: FILED NONE

REQUEST TRANSCRIPT DATE FILED NONE

NOTICE OF APPEAL DATE FILED 02-20-15

NUMBER OF DAYS: ( CLERKS RECORD ) 10

FILE ORDERED: YES NO IMAGED FILED: YES NO 

CODES FOR NOTICE OF APPEAL: BC , C, OA

CHRIS DANIEL 

Harris County, District Clerk

 By: /s/PHYLLIS WASHINGTON

 PHYLLIS WASHINGTON, Deputy

BC NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

BG NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED – GOVERNMENT

C JUDGMENT BEING APPEALED

D - ACCELERATED APPEAL

OA NO CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED

O CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED (W/NOTICE OF APPEAL)

NA AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/4/2015 6:20:25 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk







JURN7 (NSA#) JUSTICE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FEB 25, 2015(C1) 

INT6510 CIVIL CASE INTAKE OPT: _____ - INT

 GENERAL PARTY INQUIRY PAGE: 1 - 1

 

CASE NUM: 201305124B_ PJN> __ TRANS NUM: _________ CURRENT COURT: 334 PUB? _

CASE TYPE: DAMAGES (OTH) CASE STATUS: ACTIVE 

STYLE: VICNRG LLC (A TEXAS LIMITED LIABI VS FCSTONE, LLC 

=============================================================================

 **** ACTIVE PARTIES **** 

 PJN PER/CONN COC BAR PERSON NAME PTY ASSOC. ATTY 

 NUM NUMBER STAT 

 _ 00004-0001 DEF FCSTONE GROUP INC 

 _ 00003-0001 DEF FCSTONE TRADING LLC 

 _ 00002-0001 DEF FCSTONE, LLC 

 _ 00001-0001 PLT 08014500 VICNRG LLC (A TEXAS LIMITED LI GLASSER, MARK

 

 

 

 

 

==> (4) CONNECTION(S) FOUND 

1=INACTIVE 2=ATY. INQ. 3=ACT.ENTRY 4=ISS. SERV. 5=DOC. INQ. 

6=CASE INQ. 7=BACKWARD 8=FORWARD 9=PTY. ADDR. 10=REFRESH 11=HELP
#### CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. Wellmann GRUENBERG and Muriel Weaver.

No. 54102.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 30, 1973.

In re: City of New Orleans applying for Peremptory Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus.

Writ denied. The matter is moot. The restraining order has expired.

BARHAM, J.,

concurs. The writ should be denied for we will not interfere with the orderly proceedings below absent showing of exceptional circumstances not presented by this application.
# Official Journal C 316E/13 D

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 316E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4813 December 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 316E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4813 December 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2005/C 316E/1 | Common Position (EC) No 35/2005 of 14 November 2005 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Community Air Traffic Controller Licence | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2005/C 316E/1

Common Position (EC) No 35/2005 of 14 November 2005 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to the adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Community Air Traffic Controller Licence

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Petition for Exemption 14 CFR 11.81

Mr. Kevin Ingraham 502 Valley

Road Cos Cob, CT 06807 Cell phone: (203) 536

- 1004 Email: Kevin.I ngraham44@gmail.com Additionally

I request an exemption to utilize my UAS to capture photos for real estate and sales purposes. I seek limited relief to operate the UAS to take aerial photographs of different homes and properties. At all times I will comply with FAA standards and will not enter premises without full permis sion of both the owners and occupants. These photographs help both real estate agents and purchasers and sellers as a whole. In a town with large estates with substantial propert y, man y times UAS photos can capture images that cannot be obtained through affordable methods. This would benefit the public as a whole, because it would reduce the air traffic over residential areas. Man y firms utilize helicopters and film crews in order obtain aerial photographs of the properties they

wish to sell. I n this in stance a UAS can be used which would guarantee far less noise and it will also travel over a much more limited space ensuring the privacy of other residents in the area. A UAS can be used on the premises and kept within its propert y lines. A helicopter how ever has to fly great distances and can cause great disruption. The UAS will be operated within all FAA standards. The average height necessary to take the desired photographs is roughl y 50

- 60 feet. The highest Ihave ever operated my UAS is 100 feet, wh ich is within the FAA regulations. Summary : UAS operation can reduce air traffic over residential neighborhoods while still providing individuals with the information they need prior to buy ing or selling a residence. UAS ’s can be operated at a safe dis tance while still ensuring the privacy of other homeowners, which helicopter operation cannot guarantee. After obtaining permission from homeowner’s and occupants a UAS can accomplish in minutes what would take helicopters hours, while greatly reducing cos t and inconvenience to neighboring residents.
# Official Journal L 71/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 71 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6114 March 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 71

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6114 March 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/394 of 13 March 2018 amending Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 as regards the deletion of air operations requirements for balloons | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/395 of 13 March 2018 laying down detailed rules for the operation of balloons pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 10 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/396 of 13 March 2018 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff | 36 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/397 of 8 March 2018 on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Portugal | 38 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/394 of 13 March 2018 amending Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 as regards the deletion of air operations requirements for balloons

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/395 of 13 March 2018 laying down detailed rules for the operation of balloons pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council

10

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/396 of 13 March 2018 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

36

DECISIONS

*

Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/397 of 8 March 2018 on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Portugal

38

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 882

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that charitable

contributions of appreciated property will not be treated as an item

of tax preference.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 16, 1993

Mr. ANDREWS of Texas (for himself, Mr. SHAW, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. BACCHUS

of Florida, Mr. KING, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. SOLOMON,

Mr. SUNDQUIST, Mr. GINGRICH, Mrs. SCHROEDER, Mr. GILLMOR, Mr.

HOCHBRUECKNER, Mr. BATEMAN, Mr. PICKETT, Mr. SENSENBRENNER,

Mr. PORTER, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. TORKILDSEN, Mr. BLUTE,

Mrs. KENNELLY, Mr. THOMAS of Wyoming, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. SAXTON,

Mr. SPRATT, Mr. UPTON, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. EMERSON,

Mr. MACHTLEY, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. LEWIS of Florida, Mr.

FROST, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. WALSH, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of

Texas, Mr. JACOBS, Mr. WILLIAMS, Mr. BAKER of Louisiana, Mr. LEWIS

of Georgia, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. MAZZOLI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that charitable contributions of appreciated property will

not be treated as an item of tax preference.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 882 IH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF TREATMENT OF CHARITABLE CON2 TRIBUTIONS OF APPRECIATED PROPERTY AS

3 ITEM OF TAX PREFERENCE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 57 of the

5 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items of tax

6 preference) is amended by striking paragraph (6) and by

7 redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (6).

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

10 December 31, 1991.

Æ
Exhibit 23.1 

Consent of Independent Auditors 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 
10-K) of Liberty Financial Companies, Inc. of our report dated February 5, 
1997, included in the 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders of Liberty Financial 
Companies, Inc. 

Our audit also included the 1996 financial statement schedules of Liberty 
Financial Companies, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). These schedules are the 
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express 
an opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, the 1996 financial statement 
schedules referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic 
financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material 
respects the information set forth therein. 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-90626) pertaining to the Liberty Financial 
Companies, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan, the Liberty Financial Companies, Inc. 
1995 Stock Incentive Plan and the Liberty Financial Companies, Inc. 1995 
Employee Stock Purchase Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 
333-20067) pertaining to the Liberty Financial Companies, Inc. Dividend 
Reinvestment Plan of our report dated February 5, 1997 with respect to the 
1996 consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and 
our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the 1996 
financial statement schedules included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of 
Liberty Financial Companies, Inc. 

                              Ernst & Young LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 
March 26, 1997
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the                           ( print page 30187)                        provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflicts: Mental Health Services Research.                    

*Date:*                         July 23, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Karen Gavin-Evans, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 6153, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-2356,                         *gavinevanskm@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 22, 2018.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-13845 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EPA / SEHSC D4 ECA MEETING

PROPOSED MEETING AGENDA

NOVEMBER 17, 2014

11:30 AM- 1:30 PM EDT

11:30 Introductions / Meeting Goals K. Thomas / P. Lewis

11:35 Update on SEHSC Progress R. Mait

12:00 Feedback on SEHSC Submissions P. Lewis

12:30 ECA Next Steps All

12:50 Collaborative Activities All

1:15 Path Forward All

1:30 Adjourn P. Lewis

•