Shaw 

Report on: 

Performed by: 

/\•Air An.alysis> Inc. 

Project Number: 416 

November 1, 2, and 3, 2006 

/!:Air Analysis• Inc. 

3904Clarks Creek Road Plainfield• Indiana • 46168 

317.837.8514 

877.683 .TEST 
3904 Clarks Creek Road Plainfield. Indiana 46168 

Tel. 317 837-8514 Fax, 317 837-8518 

Air Analysis, Inc. represents that the information provided in this report is true and accurate. We at Air Analysis, Inc. strive to remain true to our mission• that the people involved are people of integrity, the data accurate, and the reporting timely. 

Sincerely, • 

Michael M. Di•n• President 

Air Ailalysis, Inc. 

Date: 

STACK TESTING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 
TABLE OF (.ON7 EN] S 

EX, EC[VI{IVE SUMf•ARg (Page 2) 

Test Su•rmmry, TaNe 1 

Visible Emissions, Table 

R•sm• s (Page 3) 

Paniculate Matter (PM) Emissions, Table 2 & 3 

Particulate Matter _<.. 10 m•cron (PMI. 0) Emissions, Table 2 & 3 

Hydrogen Chloride (HCl)Emissions, Table 2 & 3 

Hydrogen Flouride (HF) Emissions, TaNe 2 & 3 

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Emissions, Table 2 & 3 

Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Emissions, TaNe 2 & 3 

DESCRIPTION OF P ROCESSES AND FIELD NOTES (Page 4) 

]•ETHODOLOG¥ (Page 5) 

Stm•mary of Sampling Procedures 

Description of Sampling Methods 

APPEND]{X 

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS 

FIELD DATA IPRINTOUTS 

FIELD DATA 

LABORATORY DATA. 

CHAIN OF CUSTODY 

CALIBRATION DATA 

VISIBLE EMISSIONS DATA 

SUBMITTED PROTOCOL 

PRODUCTION DATA 

I 

II 

Ill 

IV 

V 

VI 

VII 

VIII 

IX 
Prqject Nt.m)ber: A 

EXECUTIV_.. E SUMMAR,=•Y 

Air Analysis, Inc. was contracted by General Shale Brick to perform air emissions sampling of Kiln #20 and Kiln #32 during brick manufacturing production in Mooresville, Indiana, on November 1, 2, and 3, 2006. The objective of the test program 

was to determine compliance with Indiana air permit requirements and MACT standards. Sampling was performed for Particulate Matter (PM), Particulate Matter < 10 microns (PM10), Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen Oxides ('NOx), Hydrogen Chlori-de (HC1) and Hydrogen Flouride (I-IF) emissions. Visible emissions also coincided during particulate sampling. The following personnel were involved with the testing program: 

Air Analysis 

Air Analysis 

Air Analysis 

IDEM 

General Shale 

Michael Dicen 

Susan Thorsell 

Ron Stapert 

Dave Harrison 

Warren Paschal 

The testing program was performed utilizing US EPA Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 9, 26A, and 202: One test run was performed on Kiln 20 on November 1, 2006, which was not included with the average of Kiln 20; three more test runs were performed on November 2, 2006 on that same kiln. Three sets of 

November 

one hour test runs were performed on Kiln 32 on 3, 2006. 

TEST SUMMARY 

Table 1 

Source 

Kihl 20 

Kiln32 

Mass Mass Hydrogen Hydrogen Time Emissions Emissions Chloride Flouride 

(PM/PMIO) 

12:30- 

17:31 

9:11- 

15:36 

(PM/PM10) 

0.7913 

lbs/hr 

SulJkttes 

corrected 

(PM/PM10) 

0.7403 

lbs/hr 

Sulfates 

corrected 

(PM) 

0.3256 

lbs/hr 

(PM) 

0.4861 

lbs/hr 

(HCI) 

2.158 

lbs/hr 

(HCI) 

0.0196 

lbs/hr 

(I-IF) 

0.0057 

lbs/hr 

0.0006 

lbs/hr 

Sulfur 

Dioxide 

(lbs/hr) 

(so2) 

18.1 

lbs/hr 

(so2) 

47.5 

lbs/hr 

0 % Opacity was read during all runs on Kiln #20 and Kiln #32 Run 1, Kiln 20 not averaged due to different production and scrubber parameters. 

Nitrogen 

Oxides 

(lbs/hr) 

(NOx) 

10.1 

lbshtr 

(NOx) 

7.6 

lbs/hr 

2 
Table 2 

Gas 

Ts 

B•xo 

02 

C02 

Qa 

Qs•d 

Ec 

E{me} 

E(me) 

1 2 3 4 Avg 

Stack Temperan•re 22•.6 2.•9.4 

Moisture (volume %) _• 4.82 •• 

Carbon Dioxide (dry volmne 2.5 2 2.2 2.5 2.6 %) 

Actual CondO{ions (aclim 

Standard Condflmns {dscfln} 

Emission RaW, (gr/dscl) PM 

EnRssion Rale. 0bs/hr} PM 

PM•MI 0, (•bsau') 

En•ssion Ra•e, 0bsam HCI 

Emission Rale, {l•/hr) HF 

Emission Rate, 0•s/hr} SO2 

Emission Rate, (ibs/hr) Nox 

42,685, .2 

31,313.9 

0.0000 

0.0000 

0.5165 

0.0032 

0.0034 

58.1 

6.7 

32,183.2 

0.0002 

0.3228 

1.2737 

0.0032 

0.0043 

22.3 

10.3 

43,651.,0 

31,891,7 

0,0012 

0.3312 

0.6697 

5.5110 

0,0069 

15.0 

10.3 

44°273.7 

31,985.4 

0.0012 

0.3228 

0.4304 

0.9604 

0.0057 

17.1 

9.9 

0.0008 

@3256 

0.7913 

2:158' 

0.0{•} 

18:.1 

10. 

TEST CONDITIONS 

'FaMe 3 

BY•o 

02 

(7)02 

Qa 

32 

Stack Tempera•me 

Moisture (volume %) 

Oxygen (dry vohmm %) 

Carbon Dioxide tdry volume %) 

248.7 

4.73 

1 ̧8 

•8,891 

2 

24 7.,, 

4.68 

18 

33,668.6 

3 

246.1 

3,99 

 ̧1.7 

34,261.2 

A•g 

2'-17.3 

.17.7 

1,6 

Qstd Standard Conditions (dscfin) 28,158 

Ec 

E(me) 

E{me) 

Emission Rate, (gr/dscf) PM 

Emission Rate, (lbs/hr) I'M 

P/v•PMI0, 

Emission Rate, {lbs/hr) HCI 

Emission Rate,. {lbs/hr) HF 

Emission Rate. {lbs/hr} SO2 

Emission Rate, llbs&a)iNOx 

0.0023 

0.4729 

0,5297 

0,043 t 

0.0005 

-I.5,9 

7..I 

24,436,5 

0.0023 

0.4742 

0.5753 

0.0027 

0,0007 

48.3 

7,8 

00024 

0,5112 

1.1159 

0.0129 

0.0C•06 

48.5 

8.0 

25:894 

0.0023 

0 4861 

07403 

O, 0 ! 96 

0OOO6 

47.5 

7.6 
Two (2) brick manufacturing lines, identified as EU-002, coD.sistit•g of the following: 

O•e (D b•'ict; mam•factur#•g, line, ide•¢#.fied as L#•e, 1, #•staYed i#• 1970, m.•)d•ied it• .1979, ]oca•ed a¢ Plcm• No. 20, ccmsis¢it[g of CheofOllOw#N: 

One (1) tunnel preod•yer and one (1) tunnel dryer using waste heat from Line 1 Kil•a, arid one (1) coal and nmural gas-fired kiln, idemified as Line Kiln, equipped with a dLy lime/sodium bicarbonate injection baghouse, identified as 

D.IFF-0I, exhausting to Stack DIFF.-01, rated at 25 million British thermal units 

per ho•r, capacity: 14.8 tons of bricks per hour. Pursuant to 40 CFR 63, Subpart JJJJJ, this is an existing affected source u.sing an emissions control system to comply with the rule. 

One (1) mill room, idemified as EU•P20oMR, equipped with a baghouse, identified as CD-P20-MR, capacity: 65 tons per hour. 

()t•e (l) brick, mam(actur#•g line, identified as Line 2, installed in 1987, located at Pkuqi NO. 32, equil¥)ed with consisd•tg of the following: 

One (1) tunnel pre-dryer and one (1) tunnel d•3,er using waste heat from Line 2 Kiln, and one (1) coal and natural gas-fired kiln,• identified as Line 2 Kiln, equipped with a dry lime injection baghouse, identified as DIFF-02, exhausting to Stack D1FF-02, rated at 25 million British thermal units per hour, capacity: 13.7 tons of bricks per hour. Pursuant to 40 CFR 63, Subpart JJJJJ, this is an existing affected source using an emissions control system to comply with the rule. 

(B) One (1) mill room, identified as EU-P32-MR, equipped with a baghouse, identified as CI)-P32q•,[I•, capacity: 70 tons per hour. 

Actual recorded production material infbrmation is in Appendix. 

4 
The samplb•g pr6•,ed•.res used by Air Analysing; b•c. are as fi•llows: 

Method "Sampling of Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources" 

Method 2 "Determining of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate" 

Method 3 "Gas Analysis fbr the Determi•mtion of Molecular Weight" Method 4 "Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gas" 

Method 5 "Determining of Particulate Emissiona" 

Method 6C "Determination of Sulthr Dioxide" 

Method 7E "Determination of Nitrogen Oxides" 

Method 9 "Visual Determination of the Opacity Emissions" Method 202 "Determination of Condensible Emissions from Stationary Sources" 

SAIFIPLE POINT DETERI•ItNATION•EPA N[ETHOD 1 Sampling poir•t locations were determined according to EPA Ret•rence Method 1. 

Sa•p•g Points 

Location, s Dhne•s•ons Ports Poh•ts Per Port Tota• Points Kiln 20 45" I.D. 2 10 20 Kiln 32 42" I.D. 2 10 20 • • 

.Exact measure pomts and distances to disturbances are listed m Appendix- EieM Data 

VELOCITY AND VOLU1FIETNIC FLOW RATE EPA IVIETHOD 2 EPA Method 2 was used to determine the gas velocity and flow rate at the stack. Figure 4-2 includes the component• of the EPA Method 2 sampling apparatus. Each set of velocity determinations included the measurement of gas velocity pressure and gas temperature at each of the Method 1 determined traverse points. The velocity pressures were measures with a T•]3e S pitot tube.. Gas temperature measurements made with a Type K thermocouple and digital pyrometer. 

GAS CON[POSFI'ION AND I•OLECULAIR WE1GtIT EPA N[E'FHOD 3 In order to de'ermine the oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations, a sample of obtained gas was 

Fyritz mmlyzcr. 

a•d ,analyzed in accordance with EPA Method 3. The gas smnple was collected using a 

The results were used to determine gas molecular weight. 

NIOISTURE CONTENT- EPA NiETHOII) 4 

The flue gas moisture content at the testing locations was determined in accordance with EPA Meth.od 4. Figure 4•2 includes the Method 4 sampling components. The gas moisture determined by was 

quantitatively condensing moisture in the chilled impingers and silica absorptio.•. •l-]•e amount of moisture condensed was determined gra:vimetrically. A dry gas meter was used to 

measure the volume of gas sampled. Moisture content is used to determine stack gas velocity. 
PANTICULATE DETERMINATION- E PA METHOD W202 Stack gas is •hdra• isokin•tically and pa•iculat• matter is collected o•_ •h• nozzle, pmb• and fiber. The probe temperature •d filter are maink•ined at •mp•atures of 248 degrees F 04- 25 deg. F). The impinger temperature and exit gas is mah•tah•ed at temperatures at or below 68 degrees F. The nozzle, probe and glass filter containers are rinsed with acetone and the rinse is captmvd m a gealed glass confiner. 

(Method 202 or•y)'I'he impmgers and connecting glassware are rinsed twice with de-ionized water and captured in a sealed container. Two rinses of methylene chloride are captured and stored in a sealed glass container 

SO2 DETERMINATION EPA METHOD 6C 

Stack gas is withdrawn fi•om the stack turd conditioned (moisture is removed) before being analyzed by infrared detection. Sulfur Dioxide molecules are "excited" by specific wave lengths. Molecular" excitement is directly proportional to the concentration of SO2. Quality assurance of the analyzer is firs• determined by direct injection of known EPA protocol 1 gas concentrations. A system check of the probe, connection lines and conditioner is also determined prior to and after" each sample period to determine drift: bias. 

NO• DETERMINATION-. EPA METHOD 7E 

SLack gas is withdrawn fiorn the stack and conditioned (moisture is removed) betbre being analyzed by chemiluminescent detection. NOx molecules are "excited" by specific wave lengths. Molecnlar excitement is directly proportional to the concentration of NOx. Quality assurance of the analyzer is first determined by direct injection of known EPA protocol 1 gas concentrations. A system check of the probe• connection lines and conditioner is also determined prior to and after each sample period to determine drift bias. 

OPACITY EPA METHOD 9 

Stack opacity readings are taken for 60 minutes at 15 second intervals for NSI•_ and 30 minutes at 15 inter'vals for state permitted, non-federal sources, by a certified visible emissions reader. The visible emissions reading are conducted during each of the particulate test runs. The results reported are 

as an average opacity reading for the half an hour period. A copy of the visible reader"s current certification is included in the Appendix. 

HYDROGEN HALIDE DETERt•cHN•T•ON- EPA METHOD 26A Stack gas is withdrawn isokinetically and halides are collected on the nozzle, probe and filter, snltimc acid and sodium hydroxide. The probe temperature and filter are maintafired at temperatures of 248 degrees F. HCL is collected in 0.1 N H2SO4. Chlorine is collected in 0.1 N NaOH. The impinger tetnperature and exit gas is maintained at temperatures at or below 68 degrees F. 

The irnpmgers and connecting glassware are rinsed twice with de-ionized water and captured in sealed a corrtainer. 

6 
APPENDIX I AAMPLE (_A• UL• TION,• 
Figure 5--1. Metals & Particulate Sampling Train 
Air Analysis, Inc. 

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS 

The tables presenting the results are generated electronically from raw data. R may not bo poss•lc to exactly duplicate these results using a calculator. The reference method data, re•aalts and all calculations are carried to sixleen decimal place• flwoughout. The final table is formatted to an appropriate number ofslgnificant figures. 

1. Volume of water collected (wscf') 

V,,a=(O.O4707X V•) 

Where: 

0.04707 

total volume of liquid collected ha impingers and silica gel (ml) 

volume of water collected at standard conditions (fir) 

conversion factor (fP/ml) 

Volume of gas metered, standard conditions (dscf) 

17.64X V•XPt,,•-• AH 

X't 

V,•,a. 13.6 a 

(460 T,,,) 

Where: 

Pb•o 

17.64 

13.6 

460 

barometric pressure (in Hg) 

average dry gas meter temperature (°F) 

volume of gas sample through dry gas meter at meter conditions (ft 3) 

volume of gas sample through dry gas meter at standard conditions (ft 3) 

gas meter correction factor (dimensionless) 

average pressure drop across meter box orifice (in HzO) 

conversion factor (°R/in Hg) 

conversion factor (in HzO/in Hg) 

°F to °R conversion constant 

Sample gas pressure (in Hg) 

Pz •', =P•,o+( •-•.6 

Where: 

Pbar• 

P• 

P• 

13.6 

barometric pressure (in Hg) 

sample gas static pressure (in HaO) 

absolute sample gas pressure (in HaO) 

conversion factor (in H20/in Hg) 
A Air Analysis, Inc. 

4. Actual vapor pressure (in Hg) 

Where: 

Pv vapor pressure, actual (in Hg) 

absolute sample gas pressure (in Hg) 

Moisture Content (%) 

V•utd V•s¢ d 

Where: 

proportion of water vapor in the gas stream by volume 

volume of gas sample through the dry gas meter at standard conditions 

volume of water collected at standard conditions (ft 3) 

Saturated moisture content (%) 

• :(•'•) 

Where: 

proportion of water vapor in gas stream by volume at saturated conditions (%) 

vapor pressure, actual (in Hg) 

absolute sample gas pressure (in Hg) 

7. Molecular weight of dry gas stream (lb/lb-mole) 

(C02) (02) •,., (CO+N2) 

(•0o) w(100) (I00) 

Where: 

Md 

Mcoz 

MCO.+N2 

CO• 

O• 

CO + N• 

!00 

dry molecular weight of sample gas (Ib/lb-mole) 

molecular weight of carbon dioxide (lb/lb-mole) 

molecular weight of oxygen (Ib/lb-mole) 

molecular weight of carbon monoxide and nitrogen (lb/lb-mole) 

proportion of carbon dioxide in the gas stream by volume (%) 

proportion of oxygen in the gas stream by volume (%) 

proportion of carbon monoxide and nitrogen in gas stream by volume (%) 

conversion factor, % 
Air Analysis, Inc. 

Molecular weight of sample gas (lb/lb-mole) 

Md 

B• 

M•_•o 

Ms 

dry molecular weight of sample gas (lb/lb-mole) 

proportion of water vapor in the gas stream by volume 

molecular weight of water (lb/lb-mole) 

molecular weight of sample gas, wet basis (lb/lb-mole) 

9. Velocity of sample gas (tUsec) 

•: (K•)(cmxv/•X I 

Kp 

Cp 

Ms 

Ps 

Vs 

460 

velocity pressure coefficient (dimensionless) 

pitot tube constant 

molecular weight of sample gas, wet basis (lb/Ib-mole) 

absolute sample gas pressure (in. Hg) 

average sample gas temperature (°F) 

average sample gas velocity (tUsec) 

°F to °R conversion factor 

10. Total flow of sample gas (acfrn) 

Q,,:(60XA,X 

Where: 

As 

Vs 

60 

cross section area of sampling location (ft 2) 

volumetric flow rate at actual conditions (acfi'n) 

sample gas velocity (Wsec) 

conversion factor, seconds to minutes 
Air Analysis, Inc. 

I. Total flow ofsample gas (dscfrn) 

Q,,•. (QoXP•X 17.64X -B,,,,) 

(t,'460) 

Where: 

Bwo 

Ps 

Qa 

Qstd 

17.64 

460 

proportion of water vapor in the gas stream by volume 

absolute sample gas pressure (in. Hg) 

volumetric flow rate at actual conditions (acftn) 

volumetric flow rate at standard conditions (dscfm) 

average sample gas temperature (°F) 

conversion factor, (°R/in.Hg) 

°F to °R conversion factor 

12. Total flow of sample gas (dscfla) 

Q,,,uh, [.(Q,,)(P,X 17.64X -B,o!](60) (t.,÷460) 

Where: 

Bwo 

Qstcl/hr 

t• 

17.64 

460 

proportion of water vapor in the gas stream by volume 

absolute sample gas pressure (in. Hg) 

volumetric flow rate at actual conditions (acfrn) 

volumetric flow rate at standard conditions (dsclinx60) 

average sample gas temperature (°F) 

conversion factor, (¢°R/in.Hg) 

°F to °R conversion factor 
Air Analysis, Inc. 

13. Percent Isokinetic (%) 

(PsX z,X (O•)2(r0 Xox1 (144X4) 

Where: 

Bwo 

Ps 

T, 

Vmstd 

Vs 

0.09450 

diameter of nozzle, inches 

proportion of water vapor hat he gas stream by volume 

percent ofisokinetic sampling (%) 

absolute sample gas pressure (ha. Hg) 

average sample gas temperature (°R) 

volume of gas sample through the dry gas meter at standard conditions (if3) 

average sample gas velocity (ff/sec) 

total sample time, minutes 

constant 

14. Pollutant concentration (gr/dscf) 

Cs•,,•q." (I 5.43Xmn) 

Where: 

Cgr/d•f 

Wrr•td 

15.43 

measured concentration in gas stream, gr/dscf 

pollutant collected, corrected for reagent blank, grams 

volume of gas sample through the dry gas meter at standard conditions (ft 3) 

conversion factor, grams to grains 

15. Pollutant Emissions, Mass Emissions Rate lbs/hr 

E •,•,, 

(lagrtctX 2"2046e 9 X Q ,,aX 60 

Where: 

E Ib•hr 

/ag pollutant 

Qs•d 

Vstd 

2.2046e-9 

60 

Mass emissions rate, pounds per hour 

micrograms of pollutant emissions 

volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dry basis (dscfi-n) 

Volume Standard conditions 

conversion factor, pounds per microgram 

conversion factor, minutes per hour 
Air Analysis, Inc. 

16. Dio×in/Furan Emission Rate, ib/ton (Compliance Determination) 

E 

C 

Q•td/hr 

K• 

Mass emissions rate, pounds per ton 

grain concentration of pollutant emissions 

volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dry basis (dscfh) 

conversion factor, 1 lld7000 grains 

production rate tons per hour 

17. DioxinfFuran Emission Rate, lag/Mg (Compliance Determination) 

(E•.,,XO.4536X 09 

(0.907) 

E • 

E 

0.4536 

109 

0.907 

Mass emissions rate, microgram per megagram 

Mass emissions rate, pounds per ton 

conversion factor, kilograms per pound 

conversion factor, micrograms per kilogram 

conversion factor, tons per megagram 
PPMVD TO LB/HR 

CO R I 

.NO• ppm NO, lbs NO, 

8•3755 x 106 dscf 

OR ppm NO• 

lbs NO, dscf 60rain lbs NO, 

dscf mhn kr hr 

.x 1.194 x 10i'• = lbs/NO• 

dscf 

SOs ppm SO. Ibs SO 

6.01S1 X 104 dscf 

OR ppm SO• x 1.660 x 10 "• 

= 

.lbs SO dscf 60 min 

dscf rnln hr 

lbs SO2 

CO ppm CO Ibs CO 

1.3762 x 107 dscf 

lbsCO dscf. 60rain lbsCO 

dscf rnin hr hr 

CH4 ppm CH• 

(1 Bws) 2,4017 × 10 

Ibs CH• dscf 60 

dscf re_in hr 

lbs CH• 

dscf 

Ibs CH, 

C•H• ppm c•H, 

(I Bws) 8,7573 x 106 

lbs 

dscf 

lbsC,H, dscf 60 rain lbs 

dscf min hr 
APPENDIX II FIELD DATA PRINTOUTS 
SOURCE TESTED: 

COMPANY NAME: 

DATE OF TEST: 

0.0032 

0°0034 

191.5000 

58.0837 

30•6200 

6.6700 

0.0032 

0.0043 

71.1700 

22.255•- 

45.7000 

10.2635 

5.51/0 

0.0069 

48,3100 

14.9455 

43.8100 

10.2635 

0,9604 

0.0057 

54.9600 

17.1212 

44.2700 

9.9044 

1.6t95 

0.0051 

Stac• Volo Fl•ow Rate 

AOF'MDSCFM __• 43,077.9131,230.5t t 42'578"17 42'785"8231,350.17 • 42'409"29 ] 43'077"9•---[ 31,014.41 "•1• 31,206.40 

Stack Gas Ve]oc•,_•_ 65.006 64.252 63.997 65°006 64.565 

Rt of Della P 1.0002 0.9928 0.9882 1.0002 0.9949 

ISOK|NET•C TESTING 

Allowable isokinetic 90-110% 

Moisture of Stack Gas 

99.19 •J 96.49 ]• 99.02 ][ 99.19 •[ 98,47 

57.348 56.002 56.851 57.348 56.887 
SOURCE TESTED: •i•hi 20 

DATE OF I'E•tT: i;0 0• 

RUN NO.: 

•ol•ular WeJ•h• of •ack Ga•, DW BaSi•, 

Md •.092 

V•std) 2.789 

Volume of D]•" Ga• Coltec• • STD. COND., 

TIn(F) •%275 

• 54.614 

Pb(inct•s Hg) j• 

•ffa H 2.843 

Vn•st(I) •,822 

8wo 4.91% 

1-8v,• •.09% 

Ms 28.55 

Ar• of S•ack (enter diam•er it= inch.), 

•e•h4n 

•ameter 

No, of St•acks 

•a.) 11.•465234 

Static P•e•sure, P• 

•tic •0 

Ps 29.97 

•ack Gas Velocity, Vs, fps 

•(•a p) 0972 

Ts 228.• 

Vs 62.604 

Stack Gas Flowrate, Qs, acfm 

A.• 11.04465234 

Qs 41486 

Stack Gae Flowrate •.. STD, COND, D• Bsei•, Qetd. 

Osld (dscf/m) 30407.26 

Ostd (dsc•/t•r) 1824435.44 

Velocity at the Nozzle, Vn 

13•a. of Noz/Je 

Time of Run 

Vn 59.86 

% leokinetic, %t 

%1 95.61 

% leoMri•ie r•asured from inteimediate values 

%I 95.98 

Pollutant Etass B'nJeMon Rate, PMR, 

Mtl (g) 000043 0[))04! 

PMR (tb/hr) 0.0032 0.0034 

PMR (Ib•AMBIM) 0.0001 0.0000 

Graln• I•r acf 

9rtacf 0.0000 

Grains par dscf 

gddscf 0.0000 

mg/d•.;cf 0.0099 

NOx (Ppm) 30.62 

NOx (•/hr) 6.669955593 

SO2 (Pgm) 191.5 

SO2 (Ibktr) 58.08372032 

0.000341 

0.0099 

DATA 
SOURCE TESTED: 

DATE OF TEST: 

RUN NO.: 

POLLUTANT: 

I•lolecul•r •Y•J_qht of •t•cR e•% Dr• •a•i•, •(I 

%CO2 

%02 

Md 

Volg•n• o• W•le• V•por ColJ•c•e• @ STD. CQND., Vwv 

Vw(•td) 

Volunm o• b• 

Tn•F) 49.425 

Vm 55.871 

Pb(i•s Hg) 30 

d• H 2.•4 

V•std) •.O02 

BWO 3.27% 

%Bw0 

Ms 28.64 

D•in 

NO. of Slacks 

AS(L.%N) 0 

As(•a.) 11 04465234 

•tatic Pressure, 

PS •.07 

•ack Gas Velocity, V•, 

TS 239.6• 

Vs •.252 

•ack Gas Flowrafe, •, 

AS 11.04485234 

Qs 42578 

•tack Gas Flowr•lte @ STD. CONDo, Dry I•}sis, Q•¢d. 

Ostd. 31350.17 

Qstd ('dscf•t•') 1881010 18 

Velocity at the Nozzla, Vn 

Tu'ne at" Run 

Vn 52.00 

%lsokinatic, %1 

%1 96.49 

%E•okinetic n•uredfromintemmdiate vulues 

%1 96.86 

Pollulant (•ass Emission Rale, Pf•R, Ibs./hr. 

Mrs(g) 0000;3 

PMR (•ofnr)= 0.0032 0.0043 

PMR (IbfMMBtu) 0.0001 0.0000 

Grains per act 

gr/acf 0.0000 

Grains per d•c• 

grKJsct 0.0000 

per n',g/d scf 

m•d$ct 0.0093 

NOx (p•n) 45.7 

NOx (ibh•r) 10.26352638 

SO2 (ppm) 71.17 

SO2 (•'r¢) 22.25590505 

An(nozz•) 0000341 

0.0093 

FELD DATA 
LOCATION: 

SOURCE TESTED: 

DATE OF TE•T: 

RUN NO.: 

POLLUTANT: }•CL• 

%C02 

%02 

Md 29 

Vol• of •ater Vapor Colt•#e• 

%•(•d) 2.0• 

Voluma of D•y Ga• Collected • 8TD. COND., V•d) T•n(F) 47.550 

Vm 56.515 

•i•es Hg) 30 

•la N 2.922 

•mma 

v•s•d) •.851 

ewe 3. 

'I-B• •.51% 

MS 28.62 

Area of •tack (enler diameter 

Width-in 

No. of 

As(L"IN) 

A.• d•a.) i,044552 

Sla#c iO 403i 

Ps 30.OY 

Slack Gae Vel•lly, V•, fps 

Cp 

sq•'(detta p) 0.986 

Ts 242.800 

Vs 63.997 

Stack GaB FIow•ate, Q s, ecfm 

As 11.044652 

Qs 42409 

•tack Gas Flew•ate @ STD. CONB., DP/Basis, Qstd, 

Qstd. 31014.41 

Velocity at the Notzle, 

L•a. of Nozzle 

T•me of Ru• 

Vn 63.37 

% •okinetic,%l 

%1 99.02 

% leekineticrm•surod fromintotmediato valu• 

%1 99.40 

Polhdaot I•a•=s Emiesion Rat% P•IR, Ib•.lhr. 

Mn(g) 0764 

PMR ([O,%-) 5.5110 0.0069 

PMR (tJ•,,tMBIu) 0.15519 0,• 

HCI HF 

Graln• •r 

•[acf 0,01• 

G•h•8 p•r dscf 

•t 0.0207 

•ins per r•dsc[ 

m•dscf 16,187011 

N• (•) 43.81 

NOx (•J•) 9.73•9 

SO2 (ppm) 48.31 

802 (•lr) 14.•5 

0.000341 

16,18701 

FIELD DATA 
SOURCE TESTED: 

DATE OF TE•T: 

RUN NO,: 

Moleculm- Weight of •ack Gas, O• Ba•i•, •d 

%C02 

%02 

Md 29 

•(std) 2.601 

Volume M D• Gas Collected @ •TD. CO•D., 

TII•F) 47.600 

Vm 57.002 

• •ffa H 3.011 

Vtn(sld) 57.•8 

Bwo 4.•% 

Ms 28.52 

Area of Stack (enter dian•ter in inches), 

•o'•-.in 

NO. of Stacks 

As(L"W) 0 

As(die.) 11.04465234 

Ps 30.07 

Stack Ga• Veloci(y, V•, fps 

Ts 242.700 

Vs 65.0• 

Stack Gas Fllowrate, Q•, acfm 

As 11.04465234 

Qs 43078 

Stack Gas F owrate @ •'rD- COND D•' 8•sio, Qsld. 

Qstd (dscUm) 31230.51 

Qstd (dscf/hr) 1873830.79 

Velocity al tile Nozzlo, Vr• 

[•. of NOZZ• 

Time of R• (0 

Vn 

%1 99.19 

% •okiaetic mea8u=•ed frmll intermediate value8 

%1 99.57 

Polh.ttant •ass I•|•ion Rate, P•R• Ibs.thr. 

0.0027 

gr/dscf 0.003• 

Grain• I•r mg/dscf 

mDklscf 2.8268 

NO× (ppm) 44.27 

NOx (Ib/br) 9.904422335 

802 (Pimp) .54.96 

802 (lb,•-..r) 17.12120172 

'12 

/k'•(nozzle 0.000341 

FIELD DATA 
SOURCE TESTED: 

COMPANY NAME: 

DATE OF TEST: 

•• VoiL F•ow Rate 

ACFIVl 

DSCFM 

A_v•_Sta0k 

0,0002 

0.3228 

0.0144 

0.'3372 

o• •L o.oo;2 

0.3312 •. 0.3228 

•,(}• [[ 0.1076 

0.4,304 

I 42 8 -°9I 43650.9 44273.69 

I. •'•'• •• 31891.72 •[ 43617.94 

31840.4'1 

64.419 66,183 65.870 66.810 65,820fJ Stack Gas Ve•oci•_ 

_Av••Head 

• R•t of Deffa P 0.9999 JL 1.0221 1,0148 1,0272 1.016-• 

Allowable isokinetic 90-110% 

% Moisture of Stack Gas 

98.2• 99.18 L 97.09 [[ 99.61 98°52 

4-87•/_1.] 3.64% 3-50% • 4.16% 

56.915 J_ 5.• L 5•l •-• •]" 58.077 
•hl) 912 

TIn(F) 55.075 

Vm(s•d) 

Q'•d (d•cr/m) 3130137 

Qstd (dscf•h 0 18780B2.24 

0.600341 
CO.•PANY NA•E: 

•URC• T•TED: 

DATE OF 

RUN NO.: 

POLLUTANT: •/• •. 

%CO2 

%02 

Md 

Volum• of Water Vapor Co}lecte• @ 8TD. COND., V• 

V• 4 

•,•std) 2.230 

Vok]}•8 of D• Gas Collected @ STD. CON[)., Vm(st•) 

TnXF) 45.525 

V•n 58.172 

• H 3.137 

V•std) 59.•2 

Bois•ure Co•t•t of •ack G•s, Bwo 

8we 3.64% 

1-BWO •.•% 

•s 28.60 

Area of Slack (enter dian•ter 

Wldl[•-irl 

No. of Stacks 

As(L°W) 

•(•a.) 11.•,t65234 

Static Pre•su•, Ps 

StaSc 

Ps •.07 

•ack Gas Velocity, Vs, fps 

Cp 8.1 

s•(•la p) 1.022 

Ts 239.350 

Vs •.183 

•ack Ga• Flow•ate, Q•, 

As 11.0•465234 

Qs 4385B 

Stack Gas Flowr•te @ STD. COND., D=• Basle, Qstd. 

Ostd (dscfhn) 32183.20 

•ld (•cf•r) 19•92.29 

Velocity at tim Nozzle, Vn 

T• of Run 

Vn •5.• 

%} 99.18 

% •okinetic =wa•u• from intemlediate valoes 

%1 99.56 

Pollutant Mass Emission Rate, PMR, Ibs./hr. 

Mn (9) 09(,:• 

PMR (•') 0.0432 

Fih•le Coczdem'ible 

Groins l•r eel 

•/ac[ 0.•01 

Gralm• •r d•cf 

•/dsc[ 0.•2 

An(r-,ozz•e) 0000341 

0.0576 

0.0012 

FELD DATA 

IK- Factor 

0.9s5 

1.000 3.000 

1.000 

1,049 

1.04£ 

1.04£ 

1.04! 

1.049 

1,000 

1.000 

1.000 

1.049 

1.049 

.O•9 

1.049 

0.990 

3.300 

3.300 •__ ":•: --•=.-T3.00._ 0_,._•_•:,._•_ ___4•;•_ 

3.0•3 :, 

••---7;•- ,•-• 

3.300 245 

• 3.300 • 

5:,0 7::•-••' 

.•- 

•;.-- 

44 
RUN NO.: 

POLLUTANT: 

%CO2 

Md 29 

Volume 

•(std) 2.079 

Tm(F) 45.4•0 

Vm 56,426 

P•inches Hg) 

delta H 3.•0 

Vm(s•d) 57.3• 

•oi•u• Co•ent of •{• G•, BWo 

Ms 28.61 

Area of S¢•c• 

Stack Gas Velocity, Vs, tpe 

sqr(deHa p) 1.015 

TS 243.400 

Vs 65.870 

Stack Gas Flowr•e, 

AS 11.04465 

QS 43651 

St•k G• FIowE•¢ • STD. COND., Dly Basis, Qstd. 

Qs,•d (d•c•tn'l) 31891.72 

Qstd (dsc•/hr) 

Vel•l• a{ the No•le, Vn 

D•. o• Nozzle 

Time of Run 

Vn 63.95 

% I•lnetlc, %l 

%1 97.09 

%l 97.46 

PolhRant M•ss Emlsston R•e, PMR, Ibs.lhr. 

Mn (g) n•.15 (,o:r= 0.•54 

PMR (Ib/hr) 0.•12 0.0•2 0.3974 

PMR (I•MMBtu) 0.•grl 0.• 0.•91 

•e/•c[ 

gr/dsc• 0.0012 

An(nozzle) 0.O00341 

FIELD DATA 
SOURCE TESTED: 

DATE OF TE•GT: 

RUN f'-]O.: 

%CO2 

%02 

Md 29 

Volume of Water Vapor Collecl•d @ •T•. COND., V• 

•(•Ad) 2.869 

Voh•mo ef 

"r•F) 43.950 

Vm 57.877 

•e H 3.170 

•std) 

Bwo 4.64% 

1-• 95.•% 

•olacular Weigbl of 8tack Gas, M• 

Ms 28.49 

V•dih-in 

diame•.er 

No. of Stacks 

As(L%•V) 0 

•da•) 11.044•234 

Ps 30.07 

•ack Gas Velocity, Vs, fps 

•((k•t• p) 1.027 

Ts 242.•0 

Vs 66.810 

Stack Gaa Flowrate, Q•, acfm 

A.s 11.04465234 

Qs 44274 

Stack Gaa Flow•ale •,. STD COND., De•' Basis, Q•td. 

Qstd (dscffm) 31985.35 

Qstd (dsci?}t¢) 1919121.01 

Velocity at the Nozzle, Vn 

Ti• • R•I 

Vn •.55 

% •kinetic, %1 

%i 9•.61 

0.000341 

%1 99.99 

Poliulan! Maas Emission Rata, PMR, |b•.thr. 

PMR (•#•) 0.3228 0.1076 0.4304 

PMR (•MMBtu) 0.•88 0.•0 0.0088 

Graias •ar ecf 

•l•cf 0.• 

•cf 0.0012 

RELD 

1.000 

1.095 

'1095 

1.049 

O00 

0.990 

(X301 1.000 

---TT•I 1.049 

-f• .•0 
SOURCE TESTED: 

COMPANY NAME: 

DATE OF TEST: 

0.0431 

so2.••_ 

SO2 (Ibs/h r• 

R• 2 

0.0027 

-IF (Ibs/hr) 0.0005 0.0007 

215.a800 223.2700 

N_.•Ox ppm 

45.8660 48.3195 

NOx (Ibsfhr) 

46.6000 49.9100 

7.1203 7.7573 

0.012£ 

0.0006 0.0006 

224.0£00 220.9800 

48.4713 

51,1000 

7.9381-- 

0.0/96 

47.5523 

49.2033 

7.8052 

Avg. Stack VoL Flow Rate 

DSCFM 21,329.17 21,696.21 21,684.74 21,570.04 

Stack Gas Ve•ocil.•_• 51.290 52.15O 52.137 51.859 

•_Rt of Della P 0.7879 0.8036 0.8028 0.7981 

ISOKINET|C TESTING SUMMARY 

%|sokiaet•cs: 

Allowable isokinetic 90-110% 

% Moisture of_ Stack Gas 

S•ample Volume 

97.94 ]98.23 • 97.48 

44.395•__..[ 45.292 44.366 44.685 
RUN •'•O.: 

%C02 

Vw(sid) 2.545 

Vo•u•n• of Dry 

T•F) 65.625 

V•d) 44.395 

• W• 

Depth-in 

A•L'W) 

As(alia.) 9,621"119375 

Static Presst•re, Ps 

Ps 30.41 

•ack Gas Ve)oc•y, Vs, •s 

Cp 

s•(•la p) 0.788 

Ts 247.• 

Vs 51,•0 

As 9.6211 9376 

Qs 29600 

•tack Gas Flow•e @ 8TD. COND., Day •,a'•,•, 

Q•d (•cf/m) 21329,17 

Q•d (•) 1279750.21 

Veloc•y at the Nozz•, Vn 

Dis. of No•le 

Vtl •.23 

% •k• measured Nora intermedl•o V•L•S 

%1 •.32 

Mn(g) 

PMR (1•-¢) 0.0431 

PMR (•bR'•MBiu) 0.0024 

•/acf 0.0•2 

• p•r 

•/•c• 0.•2 

•dscf 0.1886 

N• (•n) 46.6 

NOx (•0 7,120334•8 

802 (ppm) 215.• 

802 (•) 45.•71 

An(nozzle): 0.000341 

0.1888 

FIELD DATA 

0.80£ 

0.81£ 

0:80,5 

0.7t% 

0,787 

0,775 

0,775 

0.775 

7 
LOCATK•N: 

SOURCE TESTED: 

DATE OF TEST: 

RUN NO.: 

POLLUTANT: 

Molec•da• Weight of •lack Ga• D• Ba•i•, •(I 

%CO2 

%02 {., 

Md 29.04 

•(•d) 2,63• 

Volu• of D• Gas Coll•i•q 

TIn(F) 73.825 

Vm 46.941 

gam• 9• 

Vm(std) 45.•2 

Moi•ure Content of Stack Ga• Bwo 

•vo 5.49% 

1-Bwo •.51% 

Ms 28.43 

Area of •tack (enter diameter in inches), 

No. o• •cks 

•(L•) 

As(•a.) 91621119375 

•atic P•ura, Ps 

Ps 30.41 

•ack Gas Vel•ffy, Ms, f• 

Cp 84 

•(• P) 0.• 

Ts 246,2• 

VS 52.150 

Stack GaB Flowrate, Qs. acIm 

As 9.621119375 

Qs 30104 

Stack GaB Flowrate @ STD. COND., Dry Basis, Qstd, 

Qstd. 21696.21 

Qstd (dsc&1"•') 1301772.42 

Velocity at the Nozzle, Vn 

Die. of Nozzle 2q 

Time of Rul •r•, 

Vn 51.23 

% Isokinetic, 

%! 9•.23 

% Isokinetic measured fre.m intermediate values 

%1 98.61 

Pollutant Mass Emission Rate, PNR, Ibs,/hr, 

Mn (g) 000042: 0000 ]0 

PMR (•r)= 0.0027 0.0007 

PMR (Ib/NMBtu)= 0.0001 0.0000 

HCI HP 

Grains per ecf 

9/act 0.0000 

Graln• per dr=cf 

gr/dscf 0,0000 

Grains p•r mgldsc• 

mg/dscf 0.0"i16 

NOx (Pt•n) 49.91 

NO× (•bff•r) 7.757323309 

SO2 (,ppn" 223.27 

SO2 (•o•r) 48.31951717 

Ar•nozz•) 0.000341 

0.0116 

FIELD DATA 
LOCATION: 

SOURCE TESTED: 

DATE OF TEST: 

RUN NO.: 

POLLUTANT: 

Molecular Weight of Slack 

%CO2 

%O• 

Md 29 

Vw(std) 2.582 

Vol• of D W Ga• Coll•ct• • •TD. CO•D, V•td) ]'•F) 75.875 

•(inc•s Hg) 

•l•a H 1.935 

•i•ure Co•e•t of Slack Ga• Bwo 

-Bwo 94.50% 

Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, 

Ms 28.39 

Area of Stack (•nter di•metor in inches), AI• 

Depth-in 

Wid•-in 

d•ameter 

NO. of Stacks 

As(L'W) 0 

As(•a.) 9.6211194 

Slatic Pressur• Pa 

Ps 

Stack Gas Velocity, Vs, fpa 

Cp •4 

scF(d•ta p) 0.803 

Ts 246 300 

Vs 52.137 

Stack Gas Flowrate, Q•, acfrn 

As 9.6211194 

De 30097 

Stack Gas Flowrate @ STD. COND., Dry Basl% Qstd. 

Qstd, 21684.74 

Qs• (dsci?nr) 1301084.39 

Velocity at the No•le, Vn 

Dia. of Nozzle 2:. 

Ti•e of RUn (,(.! 

Vn 50.19 

% |sol;inetic,•4 

%1 96.27 

% •okineticmeasure• fro•inlem•diate valuaa 

%l 96.64 

Pollutant Mass EmiGsio•,1 Rate, PMR, Ibs./hr. 

Mn (g) 00O 199! 9f;L 0:, 

PMR (ll•') 0.0129 0.0006 

PMR (Ib/MMBtu) 0.•052 0.•00 

HCL HF 

Grains •r acf 

•/acf 0.(•1 

Graim• p• decf 

•t• 0.0001 

•ins • m•c• 

e•cf 0.•5396 

NOx (•m) 51.1 

NOx (Ibf•') 7.9380828 

SO2 (R•) 

SO2 (•#•) 4&471•47 

An(nozz•): 0.000341 

0.05554 

FIELD DATA 
SOURCE TESTED: £ii:,• 5• 

COMPANY NAME: (•ene•at 

DATE OF TEST: !/03/06 

Filterable (gr/dscf) 0.0023 

Filterable (Ibs/hO 0.4729 

Condensible (l__b_s/hr) 0.0568 

Filterable + Condensible (•bs/h 

Avgo Stack VoL Flow Rate 

ACFM 

DSCFM 

A_vg. Stack Temp. 

Stack Gas Velocity 

Avg. Velocity Head 

_Av•. Sq.•Rt of Delta P 

0.5297 

•[ 3392• 33715.•7• • 34015.35 

24371.63 •"•4-- 1 24630.2•[ 24428.78 

58.772 

0.8132 

0.9018 

247.250 t 246.100_-] • 

5•.4o6 •] •.9•48 

o.8o91 0.8209 

•_.• 0.9167 1 0.9060 

ISOKINETlC TESTING SUMMARY 

%lsok•netics: 

Allowable isokinetic 90-110% 

% Moisture of Stack Gas 

_Samo•le•V_ olume 

98.71 ] 98.45 I 99-84 99.00 

5.48£ 5.40%] 6.1• 5.670/0 5•.3• [ 50.-7•0• 5•• ] 51.399 
•URCE TE•TEO: Kd• 3P 

DATE OF TEST: 

RUH •0,: 

%C02 

%02 

Md 28.88 

VolumB ol Wa•er Valor Collected @ STD. COND,, Vwv 

•(std) 2.964 

Volu•e of D• Gas C•lleded • B'[D. COND,, 

TIn(F) 57.925 

•• 51.078 

P•inches Hg) 3b 

•ta H 2.•1 

Vn•sld) 51.126 

•oi•ture Content of Stack Ga•, Bwo 

Bwo 5.48% 

1-• 94.52% 

•oleculer W•igh• o• Stack Gas, 

Ms 2828 

No. of St•cks 

As(L'W) 0 

As(c•a.) 9.621119375 

•tatic Pressure, Ps 

Ps •.41 

Stack Gas Vel•ity, Ve, fps 

•a p) 0.902 

Ts 248.6• 

Vs •.772 

•ack Gas Fl•wrate, Qs, acfm 

As 9.621119375 

QS 33927 

Stack Gas FIowrate @ STD. COHD., Dry Basi•= Qstd. 

Qstd (dscffm) 2437'1.63 

Qstd (dsc•fnl) 146.2"297.99 

Velocily at the Nozzla, Vn 

D•a. of Nozzle ',•L 

MS 58.0I 

% Isokinetic, %1 

%1 9•J 7l 

% Jseklnetic measured frail intern•,•dlete values 

%i 99.09 

Pollutant Mass Emission Rate, P•R, tbs./hr. 

PMR (•#•')= 0,4729 0,0568 

6•ins per acf 

•/acf 0.•17 

Grains •r dscf 

•/•cff 0.0023 

An(nozzle): 0000341 

0.0084 

0.5297 

0.0228 

FIELO DATA 

2 

4 

5 

6 

10 

11 

t2 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 
Vv•s•d) 2.9C)2 

Vek•m•, of D•y Gas C•c•ad @ STD. COND., Vr•s•d) 

TIn(F) 63.575 

V•std) 50.809 

MS 20.44 

As 9.621119375 

Qs 33716 

8•acR G•s Flowt•o • •T•, COND., D• Basis, •ld. 

Q•d (d•f•l) 24284.44 

Q•d (d•cf•) 1457•.48 

Ve•c• • the •oz•, Vn 

Ar,(noz•e) 0.000341 

FIELD DATA 
LOCATION: •j• .• 

8OURCE "rE£TED: t•h ,? 

DATE OF TEST: •. 

RUN NO.: 

POLLUTANT: 

•lec•l•r Weight of St•k Ga•, Dry B•ls, F3d 

%CO2 

%02 

Md 29 

Volume oi Wa•el' Vaper C•llecled 

VIc 7:5 

•(s{d) 3.410 

Volume o• D• Gas Collected @ STD. COND., 

TIn(F) •1.300 

Vm 52. 845 

P•inches H•) :,) 

det• H 2.523 

Vm(std) 52.•2 

M• Cen•nt ef •{•{:k Gas, 

Bwo 6.13% 

1-Bv• 93.87% 

Ms 

Area of St•k (enter diameter In Inches), A• 

Depth-in 

W•th-in 

diameter 

NO. of ,StaCks 

As(L"W) 0 

As(dia.) 9.62111930 

Static Pt•sure, 

8•tic 

Ps 30.41 

Stack Gas Vel•ll•, Vs, fps 

Cp o 

sqr(delta p) 0.917 

Ts 246.100 

Vs 59.597 

St•k Gas Flowr•e, 

• 9.621119• 

Qs 3•03 

8•k G•$ Fl•t• e STO. CONO., D• B•Is, Qstd. 

• (d•/hr) 1477815.39 

Vel•lty • the Nozzle, Vn 

D•. O• N%zzie 

Ti• • Run 60 

Vn 59.• 

%• 99.84 

%1 1•.23 

Mn (g) 00;? •C)A; 0.0082 

PMR (l•h 0 0.5112 0.• 0.5112 

PMR 0b/MMB•0 0.0181 0.0•0 0.0181 

• •#erab[e Co•ler•ible 

Grains •r 

gr/act 0.•18 

Groins per d• 

gr/d•f 0.•24 

Al•(nozzle: 0.00034'1 

FIELD DATA 

Col•ni•l Brick 

22 

24 
APPENDIX IH FIELD DATA 
VELOCITY TRAVERSE PO•NIT DETERMINATION 

(EPA Method 

Tavers•, Pc4nts o[• Diamete•: 

Stack Dia.(inches)? 

@ I•'J#er•sville 

1.98 1.44 1.17 8°95 

6.57 4.73 3.69 3,82 

13.32 8.73 6.57 

4• 

1 3.02 

2 11.25 

3 33.75 

4 41.99 

6 

7 

8 

9 

16 

11 

12 

31.68 

,38.43 

14.54 

30.47 

10.17 7,97 

15.39 I i °25 

43.02 38.27 29.61 1 

40.28 34.83 28,98 

43.58 38.43 

41.31 37.04 

39.•9 

41t.99 

44.68 


0 

VELOCITY TRAVERSE POINT DETERMINATION 

(EPA Method 1) 

Tavei-se Poin• or• Diameter: 

Stack Dia.(inches)? 

Po•ats: 2.81 

10.50 

31.50 

39.19 

7 

8 

10 

11 

12 

1.85 1.34 1.09 &88 

6,13 4.41 3,44 2.81 

12.43 8.15 6.13 4.94 

29.57 13.57 9.49 

35.87 28.43 14.36 

40.15 33.85 27.64 14.95 

37.59 32.51 27'.05 

40.66 35.87 31 

38.56 34°57 

40.91 37.04 

39.t9 
Z 

Z 



VELOCll•f TPd:•VERSE POINT DETERMINATION 

(EPA Method 1) 

i/0 3/[)(i 

]'averse Points on Diamefer: 

Stack Dia.(inches)7 42 

t 

2 

3 

4 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

2.81 

10.50 

39.19 

1.85 

6.13 

1•34 

4.41 

8.15 

3.44 

6.13 

8.88 

2o8t 

29.57 13.57 9.49 7.43 

35.87 28.43 14.36 10.58 

40.15 33.85 27.64 t4o95 

37.59 32.51 27.05 

40.66 35.87 

38.56 

40.91 

31 

3&57 

37.6• 

39.19 

41 



VELOCITY TRAVERSE POIN'I" DETERIVltNA-['ION 

(EPA {•-lethod 1) 

Kiln 32 

General Shale 

]"averse Points on 

Stack,{ Dia.(inches)? 

Points: 

• 8I •I •0[ 12] 42 

2 

3 

4 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

t2 

2.81 1,85 1.34 .09 0.88 

33.85 14.95 

37.59 32.5t 27.65 

40.66 35.87 31.50 

38.56 34.57 

40.91 37.64 

3&19 

41.12 

40.15 

10,50 6.13 4.41 3.44 2,81 

31,50 12.&3 8.15 6.13 4.98 

39.19 29.57 •" 9.49 7.43 

35.87 28.43 10.50 



(IAIdd) enleA 

0 0 0 0 0 

I'•- 

-ell 

ill 


C• 

(tudd) enleh 
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(tudd) enleA 

O(.(3 

COO 

oE 

.o.E 

0•0 

E 
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

(todd) enleA 

0 0 0 0 

0(.0 

0•0 

E 
0 0 0 0 

u• c• u• o 

0 0 0 0 0 

(uadd) anleA 

O0 

0•0 
0 0 0 0 

(l•dd) anleA 

or•O 

00• 

0"30 
(l•dd) anitA 

OC• 
(I/•ldd) enleA 

0 
Me hod 6c Typ9 Data Shee, 

Tes•g Location 

On site Contact 

Gas Concentration (Indicate Units) 

Value 

[ero Mid-Range Hi;Ih-Range 

0.25 percent of span. 50 to 8q percent of span. 80 to g0 percent of 

Calibration Error 

Span 

Cylinder Value Analyze=" Celibratlofl Respons( Ab•01u•e,Oifference 

• • • • 

8ys•m Callbm•on Bias 

Zero gas 

Mid-range 

High.range gas 

Init• Values 

System Bias 

Zero D• 

zero 

...%:z,• •qq:- 

Difference (Percent spea) 

2% of Sp•n 

Final Values 

System Cal Respons• System Ca1 Bias 

Calbratlon,Ddft 3% 

Time ppm 
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

o c:; o o c• • o o o o c• • 

(I/•dd) anleA 

Cq•D 

(tudd) anleA 
N O•... • •'T6• 

/0o,. -z.sz, ---T oRS• 
Value (ppm) 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

o h• o h• • h• •o h• o o • h• o o o 
Value (ppm) 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • o o • h• • o o o • o 
Value (pprn) 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o • o b o o b o b 
O0 

Value (PPM) 

• O• 

(.n 0 
oo 

0) o 

Va|ue (PPM) 

o o o o • o 
Value (PPM) 
Air Anal }.•sis, 

P•o.ject Numbe•-: ,-ll6 

APPENDIX IV LABORATORYDATA 
Geueral ,:>hale Brick Inc. 

Ploject N•lmber: 4 I(• 

PM DETERMINATION 

FILTER 

Kiln 20 

Filter 

564 

Run # Pre-Weight Post-Weight 

1 0.3572 0•3572 

568 2 0.3746 0.3752 

569 3 0.3645 0.3681 

575 4 0.3820 0.3863 

0.0000 

0.0006 

0.0036 

0.0043 

Kiln 20 

Beaker 

D 

E 

G 

Acetone Beaker (50mls) 

2 

3 

ACETONE 

78.0754 

80.1636 

54.7909 

56.3314 

54.6487 

Post-Weight 

78.0754 

80.1636 

54.7918 

56.3316 

54,,6487 

Net Gain 

0,0000 

0.0000 

0.0009 

0.0002 

0.0000 

Kiln 20 

1 

3 

TOTAL 

Fi•er Net Gain 

0 

0.0006 

0.0036 

0.0043 

Acetone Net Gain 

0 

0.0009 

0.0002 

Totals 

0 

0.0006 

0.0045 

0.0045 

7 
(]eileral Shale Brick, 

COND•N$•L• D•T•INAT•ON 

K•ln 20 

L 

N 

Run # 

2 

562006 

57.0849 

66.0980 

79.1680 

(50•}l•ls H20) 5•.9340 

Post=Weight 

56.2071 

57.0998 

66=1044 

79.1708 

56.9340 

Net Gain 

0.0065 

0.0149 

0.0064 

0.0028 

0o0000 

DI/SULFATE CALCULATIONS 

Kiln 20 

L 

N 

0 

1 

Net Gain 

0.0065 

0.0149 

0,0064 

0.0028 

DI 

Inhouse 

344 

349 

334 

354 

DI 

Lab 

Volun•e 

3O 

3O 

3O 

3O 

Total 

374 

379 

364 

384 

Net Gain 

(grams) 

0.00707 

0.01618 

0.00697 

0.00304 

Suffate 

0.00011 

0.00011 

0.00011 

0.00010 

Net minus 

Sulfate = 

Grams 

0.00377 

0.01288 

0.00367 

0,00004 

.DI •et gain grams x (total nds/(total mls aliquot) •ulfate grains c•rrecte{t gah• 
Gerleral Shale Brick, Inc. 

Proiect ,qumb{:• 416 

CONDENSIBLE DETEICdVIINATION 

Kiln 20 

Beaker 

T 

U 

V 

W 

Blank ECeaker 

2 

4 

{50m|s MeCI2) 

Pre-Weight Post•Weight 

79.0548 

66.8980 

Net Gain 

79.0581 

66.8982 

55.3797 

55.5468 

0.0033 

0.0002 

3 55.3788 0.0009 

55,5453 0.0015 

55.t 917 55.1917 0o0000 

K•|n 20 

Run # 

1 

2 

H20 Net Gain 

0.0038 

0.013 

3 0.0037 

4 0.00004 

TOTAL 

MeCI2 Net Gain Totals 

0.0033 0o0071 

0.0002 0.0132 

0.0009 0.0046 

0.0015 0.0015 
(•eneral Shale Brick, h•c, 

)Pro.ject Ntm•ber: 410 

PM DETERMIN ATION 

FILTER 

Kiln 32 

Filter tD Pro-Weight Post-Weight Net Gain 

571 t 0.3756 0.3823 0.0067 

572 2 0.3706 0.3769 0,0063 

573 3 0.3858 0.3926 0.0068 

Run # 

Kiln 32 

H 1 

2 

J 3 

Acetone Beaker (Semis) 

ACETONE 

Pro-Weight Post-Weight 

55.2776 55.2784 

55.1293 55.1305 

66.5123 66.5137 

54.7889 54.7889 

0.0008 

0.0012 

0.0014 

0.0000 

Kiln 32 

Run # 

3 

TOTAL 

Fi•ter Net Gain 

0.006'7 

0.0063 

0.0068 

Acetone Net Gain 

0.0008 

0.0012 

0.0014 

Totals 

0.00'75 

0.0075 

0.0082 

10 
.•,ue•al Shale 

Prqj oct N u tuber: 

CONDENSIBLE DETERMINATION 

P 

Q 2 

3 

Pre-Weiight 

63.8080 

55.0508 

79.7418 

55.277• 

Pest=Weight Net Gain 

83.8138 0.0058 

55.0522 0.0014 

79.7519 0.0101 

58.2776 0.0000 

D][/SULFATE CALCULATIONS 

Kiln 32 

ID 

0,0058 

,.ho.se 

Vo|ume 

456 

DI 

Volume 

456 0.00621 

486 

426 30 

0.0014 375 30 405 0,00151 

0.0101 3O 0.01076 

S.lfate 

0,0003 

0.0001 

0.0000 

Net minus 

Su|fate = 

Grams 

-0.00369 

0,00001 

0.00968 

DI •let gain grams x (total mls/(total ntis aliquot) sulfate grams corrected gain 
(.•:•{:/al Shale. Brick, I•c, 

Project Number: 416 

CONDENSIBLE DETERi•INATION 

(Continued) 

MeCl2 

Kiln 32 

Beaker liD 

× 

Y 

Z 

1 

2 

3 

Blank Beaker (5Orals MeCI2) 

Pre'Weight 

56.7672 

Post-Weight 

56.7681 

Net Gain 

0.0009 

55.7528 

80.1389 

56o329t 

55.7544 

80.1389 

56.3291 

0.0016 

0.0000 

0,0000 

TOTAL 

Kiln 32 

Run # H20 Net Gain MeCI2 Net Gain Totals 

1 

2 

3 

0 

0.00001 

0.0097 

0.0009 0.0009 

0.0016 0.00161 

0 0.0097 

12 
Aaalys s 

3904 Clarks Creek Road 

Plainfield, IN 46168 

General Shale Clarks Creek 

Analytical Report 

(1106-42) 

EPA Me th o d 2 6A 

Hydrogen chloride 

Hydrogen fluoride 

HPL C Analysis 

Sulfate 

Enthalpy Analytical, inc. 

Phone: (919) 850 4392 / Fax: (919) 850 9012 www.enthalpy.com 2202 Ellis Road Durham, NC 27703 5518 
I certify that to the best of my knowledge all analytical data presented in this report: 

® Have been checked for completeness 

® Are accurate, error-free, and legible 

® Have been conducted in accordance with approved protocol, and that all deviations and analytical problems are summarized in the appropriate narrative(s) 

® This analytical report was prepared in Portable Document Format (.PDF) and contains 150 pages. 

QA Review Performed by: Michael Steven Schapira 
Summary of Results 
CompanylAir Analysis, Inc. 

AnalystlKEH ParameterslEPA Method 26A 

# Samples•7 runs & 1 blank 

Client #lGeneral Shale 

Job #11106-42 

PO #lVerbal Report DateJl 1/27/2006 

Compound Sample ID / Catch W•) 

Hydrogen fluodde 

Hydrogen chloride 

Kiln 32 Run 1 

7.70 ND 

678 

Kiln 32 Run 2 

10.5 J 

42.6 ND 

Hydrogen fluodde 

Hydrogen chlodde 

Kiln 20 Run • 

45.9 J 

43.3 ND 

Kiln 20 Run 2 

58.3 

43.1 ND 

Hydrogen fluoride 

Hydrogen chloride 

Kiln 20 Run 4 

79.7 

13,333 

H2S04 Blank 

4.26 ND 

23.5 ND 

Kiln 32 Run 3 

9.98 ND 

199 J 

Kiln 20 Run 3 

95.6 

76,370 

1106-42 m26 Results 11/27/2006 
CompanylAir Analysis, Inc. 

AnalystlKEH Parameters/HPLC Analysis 

# SamplesJ7 runs & 1 blank 

Client #lGeneral Shale 

Job #11106-42 

PO #lVerbal Report Datell 1/27/2006 

Compound Sample ID / Concentration (ug/mL) 

Sulfate 

Kiln 32 Run 1 

331 

Kiln 32 Run 2 

47.5 

Kiln 32 Run 3 

35.5 

Sulfate 

Kiln 20 Run 1 

112 

Kiln 20 Run 2 

111 

Kiln 20 Run 3 

105 

Sulfate 

Kiln 20 Run 4 

98.6 

Di H20 Blank 

0.0622 ND 

1113R-42 Sulfate Results 11/2712006 
Results 



Narrative Summary 
Enthalpy Analytical Narrative Sun, mary 

•ysis, C|ie•a• #• General-Shale 

Inc. •06-42 

Pzr•nae•er•,• Eff•-Method 26A 

Custody 

Analysis 

Separation 

Matrix Spikes 

Blanks 

Reproducibility 

Reporting Notes 

Edn Ortiz of Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. received the samples at ambient temperature on 11/10/06 after being relinquished by Air Analysis, Inc. Prior to analysis the samples were kept under lock with access only by authorized personnel of Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. 

The samples were analyzed according to the procedures outlined in EPA Method 26A. The acid (H2SO4) matrix samples were analyzed for the chloride (Cr) and fluoride (F-) ion. 

Quantitation was performed using a Hewlett Packard series 1100 High Performance Liquid Chromatograph equipped with a Dionex ED40 Electrochemical detector and a Dionex ASRS-ULTRA® 4-mm autosuppressor. 

250 

Separation was accomplished by a Dionex IonPac AS-14A 4 mm x 

mm column. A copy of the analytical method (1006-38M) is included. 

Before and after sample analysis, calibration curves were prepared and analyzed. Fluoride and chloride eluted at approximate ly 2.6 and 3.4 minutes respectively. Both compounds separated well and were easily identified. 

A 0.500-mL aliquot of sample Kiln 32 Run 1 was spiked with 0.663 pg of hydrogen fluoride (HF) using 25.0 •tL of a solution containing 26.5 •tg/mL I-IF. The spiked sample was analyzed in the 

same manner as the other samples. The calculated HI: spike recovery was 93.9%. 

A 0.500-mL aliquot of 4.082-fold diluted sample Kiln 32Run 1 was 

solution 

spiked with 1.29/ag of hydrogen chloride (HCI) using 25.0 p.L of a 

containing 51.4 •g/mL HC1. The spiked sample was 

analyzed in the same manner as the other samples. The calculated HCI spike recovery was 90.2%. 

One blank sample H2S04 Blank was analyzed and reported. No blank adjustments were made to any of the reported data. 

OK 

The H•SO4 matrix samples were analyzed for Cr and F but are 

reported as HCl and HF. The peaks listed in the "Sample Chromatograms" section are labeled hydrogen chloride. The additional molecular weight contribution from the [•- is included in the results listed on each chromatogram and throughout the report. 
Entha|py Analytical Narrative Summary 

C••y.• Air A•alysis, Inc. 

L____..•J: Verbal 

Custody 

Analysis 

Separation 

Matrix Spike 

HPLC P•nalys•s ] 

Erin Ortiz of Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. received the samples at ambient temperature on 11/10/06 after being relinquished by Air Analysis, Inc. Prior to analysis the samples were kept under lock with access only by authorized persormel of Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. 

The samples were analyzed for sulfate using a Hewlett- Packard series 1100 High Performance Liquid Chromatograph with a Dionex ED40 conductivity detector and a Dionex ASRS suppressor. 

Separation was accomplished by an Dionex IonPac AS14 250 

x 4.0 mm analytical column using 8.0 mM Na2CO3/1.0 mM NaHCO3 as the eluent at 1.2 mL per minute. A copy of the analytical method (0306-29.M) is included. 

Before and after sample analysis, a calibration curve was 

prepared and analyzed. 

Sulfate eluted at approximately 6.1 minutes, separated well, and was easily identified. 

A matrix spike was prepared by spiking a 0.500-mL aliquot of 

a 40-fold diluted sample Kiln 20 Run 1 with 1.25 •tg of sulfate (25.0 gL of a 50.0 •tg/mL solution). The spiked samples were 

analyzed in the same manner as the other samples. The calculated spike recovery was 93.7%. 

Reproducibility OK 

Quality of Data OK 

Reporting Notes Aliquots of each sample were received instead of the entire sample. Therefore all the sulfate results have been presented as 

concentration (gg/mL) values instead of catch weights. 
General Reporting Notes 

The following are general reporting notes that are applicable to all Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. reports, unless specifically noted otherwise. 

confina 

The symbol MDL represents the Minimum Detection Limit. Below this value the laboratory cannot the presence of the analyte of interest reliably. 

quantitate 

The symbol LOQ represents the Limit of Quantification. Below this value the laboratory cannot the analyte of interest within the criteria of the method. 

The symbol ND following a value indicates a non-detect or analytical result below the MDL. 

The symbol J following a value indicates an analytical result between the MDL and the LOQ. A J flag indicates that the laboratory can positively identify the analyte of interest as present, but the value should be considered an estimate. 

The symbol E following a value indicates an analytical result exceeding 100% of the highest calibration point. 

The symbol DF represents a Dilution Factor. This number represents dilutions during the extraction and/or laboratory stages of sample treatment. The analytical result taken from a laboratory instrument is multiplied by the DF to get final results. 

The Sample ID MS represents a Matrix Spike. An aliquot of an actual sample is spiked with a known amount of analyte so that a percent recovery value can be determined. This shows what effect the sample matrix may have on the target analyte, i.e. whether or not anything in the sample matrix prohibits analysis for the analyte(s). 

The Sample ID MSD represents a Matrix Spike Duplicate. Prepared in the same manner as an MS, the use of duplicate matrix spikes allows further confirmation of laboratory quality by showing the consistency of results gained by performing the same steps multiple times. Most methods performed by Enthalpy do not require analysis of an MSD. 

The Sample ID BS represents a Blind Spike. A member of the Quality Assurance department has created BS samples for many of the analytes Enthalpy tests for, and only QA and the Enthalpy Analytical ownership have access to the actual values of these samples. The laboratory analyzes them without knowledge of the actual value, and the spreadsheets get completed for these samples solely by the QA group. 

The Sample ID LCS represents a Laboratory Control Sample. Whenever spikes are prepared for clients our 

more spikes are prepared than needed. The extras (randomly chosen) are kept in-house at the appropriate temperature conditions. When the spike samples come back from the client for analysis, the LCSs (usually two are saved) are analyzed to confLrm that the analyte could be recovered from the media, separate from the spike samples which were used on the project and which may have had issues caused during collection and/or transport. 

Significant Figures: Where the reported value is much greater than unity (1.00) in the units expressed (specifically values of 1,000 or greater), the number is rounded to a whole number of units, rather than to 3 significant figures. For example, a value of 10,456.45 ug catch is rounded to 10,456 ug. There are five significant digits reported, but no confidence should be placed on more than three significant digits. 
Sample 

Chromatograms 
Data File H:\LC2006Q4\GONZO\DATA\NOV\II06-47A\031-2101.D 

1106-42 

Sample Hame: Kiln 32 Run 1 

Sample 

Injection Date 11/20/2006 7:55:42 PM Seq. Line 21 

Acq. Operator 

Name Kiln 32 Run 1 Location Vial 31 KEH 

Acq. Inj 1 Instrument Gonzo 

Acq. Inj Volume 25 •i Method H:\LC2006Q4\GONZO\METHODS\I006_38.M Last changed 10/9/2006 11:51:11 AM by KAM Analysis Method H:\LC2006Q4\GONZO\METHODS\II06-42S.M Last changed 11/21/2006 10:01:32 AM by KEH 

ADC1 B, Oionex ED 40 (H;•LC2006Q4•GONZ•ATAVqOV•l10•47A•031.210,I.D) 

500 

480 

460- 

420- 

400 

External Standard Report 

Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified 11/21/2006 10:01:27 AM Multiplier 1.0000 

Dilution 1.0000 

Use Multiplier & Dilution Factor with ISTDs 

Signal I: ADCl B, Dionex ED 40 

RetTime Type 

[min] 

2.642 

3.474 

Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[uS*s] [ug/mL] 

Hydrogen Fluoride 

Hydrogen Chloride 

Totals 0.00000 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator[ 1 Warnings or Errors 

Warning Calibrated compound(s) not found 

Gonzo Reprocess 11/21/2006 10:46:40 AM KEH Pag6 1 of 2 
",:Ah: A.nalysjs, Inco Geuetal Shale I:!hick, h•c. 

P•o, ject Numbe•: 4 16 

APPENDIX V CHAIN OF CUSTODY 
Sample Custody 
J 




Prqiect Nmnbe•: 4 




(317) 837- 8514 

• 837- 8518 FAX 

3904 Clarks Creek Road 

Plainfield, Indiana 46168 

PiTIOT TUBE CAUBRATION 

Reference: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 2, Section 2.1 

Project 

Location 

Probe Number/ID Six foot probe A 

Date of Job 

Calibra'don Date 7105/06 

External Tubing Diameter 

Base To Opening Plane Distance (Pa). 

Base To Opening Plane Distance (Pb),, 

0.95 cm 

1.2•5 cm 

1.25 cm 

PblDt 

Pa/Dt 

Ang'• a 

Angle 

1.32cm 

1.32cm 

1 deg 

Allowable 

1.05/1.5 

1.05-1.5 

c= and c= 2 < 10.0 Degrees 

1 deg a 1 and (• 2 • 10.0 Degrees 

Angle I• 1 0 deg 13 1 and 13 2 • 5.0 Degrees 

Angle • 2 0 deg 13 1 and 13 2 • 5,0 Degrees 

z (cm) 0.0 Z is less than 0.32cm 

w (cm) 0.0 W is less than 0.08cm 

ICE 35•/ 34 0 

Ambient 70 •/ 

If all cdteria are met, Pitot 

Coefficient is 0.84 

Boiling hot/H2o 153 • •' 152 •'' 

J 

71 

Pitot Coefficient: 0.84 

Signature 
017) 837- 8514 

017)837- 8518 FAX 

3904 Clarks Creek Road 

Plainfield, Indiana 46168 

Project 

Client 

Location 

Probe Number/ID 

PITIOT TUBE CAUBRATION 

Reference: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 2, Section 2.1 

••robe -B 

Date of Job 

Calibration Date 7/05/2006 

Extemal Tubing Diameter 

Base To Opening Plane Distance (Pa)___ 

Base To Opening Plane Distance (Pb). 

0.95 

1.25. cm 

1.25 cm 

Measured 

Pb/Dt 1.32cm 

Pa/Dt 

Angle 

Angle a 2 

Angle 13 1 

Angle •1 2 

z (inches) 

w (Inches) 

Ice Mercury thermometer F 

33 • 

32 

Ambient 

1.32crn 

1 deg 

1 deg 

0 deg 

0 deg 

0.0 

0.0 

If all criteria are met, Pitot 

Coefficient is 0.84 

Boiling/Hot H2o 

150 • 

149 

Allowable 

1.05/1.5 

1.05-1.5 

o 1 and o 2 -< 10.0 Degrees 

o 1 and o 2 < 10.0 Degrees 

13 1 and J3 2 < 5.0 Degrees 

j3 1 and J3 2 <5.0 Degrees 

Z is less than 0.32cm 

W is less than 0.08cm 

Pitot Coefficient: 0.84 

Signature 


Certificate of Analysis: EPA Protocol Gas Mixture 

SG9148819BAL Reference Number: 54-124060809-15 

3/29/2008 

ASG Chicago- IL 

Expiration Date: 

Laboratory: 

Cylinder Number: 

Cylinder' Pressure: 2000.6 PSIG 

Certification Date: 3/29/2006 

Certified Concentrations 

XIDE 

Concentration Accuracy 

Alrga$ Specialty Gases 

12722 Seulh Wenlw0dh Avenue 

Ch,cago. IL 60628 

•W.mrgas.com 

499.9 PPM +/- 1% NDIR 

Analytical Principle Procedure • GI B a la c,,,,,,,,=e n 

Analytical 

Certification 

Methodology 

performed in 

does 

accordance 

not require 

with "EPA Traceability Protocol (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procedures listed. correction for analytical interferences. 

Notes: 

.•.• ,/,-'• Do not use cylinder below 150 psig. Approval Signature ,"•;. 

Reference :4. 

Standard Information 

NTRM 1050312 

Analytical Results 

1st Component SULFUR DIOXIDE 

1st Analysis Date: 03/21/2006 

R 997 S 501 Z 0 

S 500 Z 0 R 997 

Z 0 R 997 S 501 

2nd Analysis Date: 03/29/2006 

R 997 S 50O Z 0 

S 500 Z 0 R 997 

Z 0 R 997 S 499 

• • .Concentration 

SULFUR DIOXIDE SG9150918BAL 996.6PPM 

Conc 500.8 PPM 

Conc 499.8 PPM 

Conc 500.8 PPM 

AVG: 500,4 PPM 

Conc 499.8 PPM 

Conc 499.8 PPM 

Conc 498.8 PPM 

AVG: 499.4 PPM 
Certificate of Analysis: 

Cylinder Number: CC138038 

Cylinde• Pressure: 2000.6 PSIG 

Certification Date: 1/27/2006 

Certified Concentrations 

Component 

SULFUR DIOXIDE 

NITROGEN 

EPA Protocol Gas 

Reference Number: 

Expiration Date: 

Laboratory: 

54-124055420-6 

1/27/2008 

ASG Chicago- IL 

Mixture 

Concentration Accuracy Analytical Principle 226.2 PPM +# 1% NDIR 

Balance 

Airgas Specialty Gases 

12722 S0ulh Wenlworlh Avenue 

Chicago, IL 60628 

www.a•rgas.c0m 

Procedure 

G1 

Analytical 

Certification 

Methodology 

performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procedures listed. does not require correction for analytical interferences. 

Notes: 

Do not use cylinder below 150 psig. Approval Signature 

Reference Standard Information 

T__vp•e [•alance Ga__s Component 

NTRM 51213 SULFUR DIOXIDE 

Analytical Results 

1st Component SULFUR DIOXIDE 

1st Analysis Date: 01/20/2006 

R 251.7 S 225,8 Z 0 

S 226.2 Z 0 R 251.7 

Z 0 R 251.7 S 225.7 

•yI.Number 

SG9151214BAL 

Conc 225,8 PPM 

Conc 226.2 PPM 

Conc 225.7 PPM 

AVG: 225,9 PPM 

2nd Analysis Date: 01/27/2006 

R 251.4 S 226.0 Z 0 Conc 226.3 PPM 

S 226.7 Z 0 R 251.8 Conc 226.6 PPM 

Z 0 R 251.8 S 227.2 Conc 227.1 PPM 

AVG: 226.6 PPM 

Concentratiod• 

251.7 PPM 
Certificate of Analysis: 

Cylinder Number: 

Cylindei" Pressure: 2000.6 PSIG 

Certification Date: 1/27/2006 

Certified Concentrations 

DE 

SC9164837BAL 

EPA ProtocoJ Gas Mi×tur - 

Total oxides of nitrogen 

Reference Number: 

Expiration Date: 

Laboratory: 

54-124055422-18 

1/27/2008 

ASG Chicago IL 

Airgas Specially Gases 

2722 Soulh Wenlworth Avenue 

Chicago, IL 60628 

w',•,•.airgas.com 

Concentration Accuracy Analytical Principle 252,3 Procedure PPM +/- 1% Chemiluminescence G1 Balance 

252.4 PPM 

Analytical 

Certification 

Methodology 

performed in 

does 

accordance 

not require 

with "EPA Traceability Protocol (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procedures listed. correction for analytical interferences. 

Notes: 

Do not use cylinder below 150 psig. Approval Signature 

Reference Standard information 

T_y.p_£ Balance Ga.• • 

NTRM 60602 NITROGEN NITRIC OXIDE 

Analytical Results 

1st Component NITRIC OXIDE 

1st Analysis Date: 01/19/2006 

R 259.7 S 255.0 Z .01 

S 255.0 Z .05 R 260.0 

Z 03 R 260,2 S 255.1 

Conc 252.1 PPM 

Conc 252.1 PPM 

C0nc 252.2 PPM 

AVG: 252.1 PPM 

2nd Analysis Date: 01/27/2006 

R 259.4 S 254.7 Z .26 Conc 252.5 PPM S 254.8 Z .32 R 259.1 Conc 252.6 PPM Z .30 R 259.2 S 254.6 Conc 252.4 PPM 

AVG: 252.5 PPM 

• Co 3centration 

CC208165 257.0 PPM 
EPA Protocol Gas Mixture Certificate of Analysis: 

Cylinder Number: SG9164042BAL 

Cylinder Pressure: 2000.6 PSIG 

Certification Date: 1/27/2006 

Certified Concentrations 

54-124055422-13 

1/27/2008 

ASG Chicago IL 

Airgas Specialty Gases 

12722 Soulh Wenlworlh Avenue 

Reference Number: 

Expiration Date: 

Laboratory: 

Chicago JL 60628 

wvw•.awgas.com 

Component 

NITRIC OXIDE 

Concentration Accuracy Analytical Principle Procedure 503.8 PPM +/- 1% Chemiluminescence NITROGEN G1 Balance 

Total oxides of nitrogen 504.0 PPM 

Analytical 

Certification 

Methodology 

performed in 

does 

accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procedures listed, not require correction for analytical interferences. 

Notes: 

Do not use cylinder below 150 psig. Approval Signature 

Reference Standard information 

Type • ,•omponeli•t 

NTRM 111203 NITRIC OXIDE 

Analytical Results 

1st Component NITRIC OXIDE 

1st Analysis Date: 01/19/2006 

R 989.5 S 502.0 Z -.72 

S 501.5 Z -.64 R 987.5 

Z -.86 R 988.1 S 500,8 

2rid Analysis Date: 01/27/2006 

R 985.0 S 501.1 Z -.55 

S 502.2 Z -.62 R 984.4 

Z -.55 R 985.7 S 501,7 

SG9165227BAL 

Conc 503.5 PPM 

Conc 503,0 PPM 

Conc 502,3 PPM 

AVG: 502.9 PPM 

Conc 504.2 PPM 

Conc 505.3 PPM 

Conc 504.8 PPM 

AVG: 504.7 PPM 

990.6 PPM 
(}e•e•al ,Shale B•ick. h•c. 

P•c!.i ect Numl)e•-: 416 

APPENDE• VII VISIBLE EMISSIONS DATA 
CARL KOONTZ ASSOCIATES 

of Nashville, Tennessee 

.•.• This is to aCkno•,wledge that 

successfully pa•icipated in Visible Emissions 

and 

training 

is qualified 

on • 

to evaluate Visible Emissions 

for a pedod of six (6) months from the date of 

certification. 
CITY 

[qUIPMENT 

OE$CRIRe eMISSION POINT /•j_F#• • 

START STOP 

HelGHT AROVE GROUND LEVEL 

013 TANCe FROM 08SERVER 

STOP 

EMIS31QN COLOR 

OPE'RA TING MODE 

HEIGHT REC4,TIVe TO 08$ER VER 

/ START STOP 

DIREC T/ON FROM 085ER VER 

DESCRIBE BACKGROUND 

START 

9ACKGROUND COLOR 

X 

MAXIMUM 0 

SUN LOCATION LINE 

Emisslcn F•,inl -• Wind 

Observer's Pcsltlon Plume 

Sun 
CITY 

PHONE 

PROC•,SS EQ UIPM E•L•,,,, 

CONT•:•L EQUIPMENT 

DESCRIBE EMISSION PQINT 

START •l/1•'#,/4 0"•. 

STATE 

SOURCE ID NUMBER 

OPERATING MODE 

OPERATING MODE 

STOP 

HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND LEVEL •- HEIGHT RELATIVE TO OBSERVE •BTART •' STOP ¢•O |START • R 

•,• 

DISTANCE FROM OBSERVER | DIRECTION FROM OBSERVER 

STOP •Z•__[•Ls TART ,•_ • STOP 

DESCRIBE EMISSIONS 

START STOP 

EMISSION COLOR 

S_]•ART•/..- STOP•-'•" ,•/• PLUME TYPE CONTINUOUS•, 

FUGITIVE 

WATER DROPLETS PRESEN• IF WATER DROPLET PLUME 

NO•_• YES !• _[ ATTACHED 7 DETACHED• POINT IN THE PLUME AT WHICH OPACITY WAS DETERMINED START STOP 

DECRIBE BACKGROUND 

'•:, STOP 

COLOR •'•',•CONDITION• START I•-•'•. STOP 

•TART /0-• STOP /0 • S•Z•-•D STOP 

AMBIENT TEMPE•TUR• • 

••• •PE•E• START • STOP • 

SOURCELAYOUTSKETCH 

Draw North Arrow 

TIME STOP TIME 

SUN 

WIND 

PLUME 

and STACK =0 

Emission Point 

Sun Locator Line 

COMN1ENTS 

AVERAGE OPACITY FOR 

HIGHEST PERIOD O 

RANGE OF OPACITY READINGS 

NUMBER OF READINGS 

ABOVE O %WERE O 

MINIMUM O MAXIMUM 

HAVE RECEIVED A COPY OF THESE OPACITY OBSERVATIONS SIGNATURE 

TITLE DATE 

OBS.•ERVER'S NAME (PRINT) 

O•BSERVER'S S•I C•NAT 0 RE'• •DATE 

••L• OR#ANI•TI• • 

• 5 •/• CERTIFIED EY a • DAT• 

VERIFIED BY • DATE 
soURcE NAME 

CITY STATE ZIP 

SOURCE ID NUMBER 

PROCESS EQUIPM•N• OPEP•TING MODE 

CONTROL EQUIPMENT OPERATING MODE 

DESCRIBE-EMISSION POINT • 

START ,• .:•/" J:::),/•) •TOP • # #/• HEIGHT@VE GROUND LEVEL HEIGHT RELATIVE TO OBSERVER ,•-• •LSTOP.• / START • ZSTOP G•t DISTANCE FROM •'•- DIRECTION FROM OBSERVER START •O StOP / •O START •# STOP• DESCRIBE EMISSIONS 

START •L • STOP C ( E• EMISSION COLOR 

START •L•STOP• • 

PLUME TYPE CONTINUOUS• 

FUGITIVE :Z INTERMI•ENT WATER DROPLETS PRESE• IF WATER DROPLET PLUME 

NO • YES (::• ATTACHED :j DETACHED• POINt IN THE PLUME AT WHICH OPACITY WAS DETERMINED START •i• StOP • • • 

SOURCE LAYOUT SKETCH 

SUN O 

WIND 

Draw North Arrow 

Emission Point 

PLUME 

and STACK =0 

Sun Locator Line 

COMMENTS 

-•AVE RECEIVED A COPY OF THESE OPACITY OBSERVATIONS .•IGNATURE 

TITLE 

DATE 

20 0 • 0 (b so 0 0 0 0 

21 O O o O 51 O O O O 

22 O O O O 52 O O O O 

23 •.) 

240 

25000(.3 

26 0 0 O 0 

54 Z'2_O 0 'O 

5•0 0 0 0 

56 00 •) O 

2o 0 0 0 0 5• 0 0 0 

0 0 O 0 o 

•v•,• o•c•rv •o• NUMBER OF READINGS HIGHEST PERIOD •• % WERE O RANGE OF OPACITY READINGS 

MINIMUM 0 MAXIMUM • 

OB•RVER'S NAME (PRINT) 

VERIFIED ¢ DATE 
WINO SPEEO 

S•'An {" 0 STOP 0 

AMSIE/V T TEMPERA TURE 

$0 URC E LA YOUT 3;KETCH 

.H. PERCFU•T 

X 

SUN LOCATION LINE 

HIGHESTP=RI•n 0 C•' WEnE • 

083•VER'S N•WE 

8$•VER'SSIGNA•R5 .; )A•E 

ORG•I•TION A •L / 

Comments: 
EQUIPMENT 

BACKGROUND COLOR 

'WfNO 

AMBIENT TEMPE.• 

SOURCE LA YG• SKETCH 

STOP '• L • • 

SKY CONDITIONS, • 

WiND DIREC •N 

sro• • 

ACRTH ,•ROW• 

x 

SUN LOCATION LINE 

Emisslcn Pc, int • Wind 

Obse•e/'• PcsltJon Plume 

Sun 

START TIME 

MAXh'vtUM • 

OBSERVER'S NAME (PRINT} 

C•SS.E.RVER'$ S/GNATURE •1 • )A•E 

C •RTE 

• " 

Comments: 
•$CRIB =- BACKGROUND 

• 

9ACKGROUNO COLO• 

STOP 

WINO 3PEEO 

AMBIENT 

$OURC• LA YO• SKETCH 

NUMBER OF READINGS 

X 

•" Emisslcn Point • Wind 

[] Obse•v'e£$ Pcsltlon Plume 

• Sun 

HIGHEST P=RIOD (• • 

WERE 

RANGE GF OPACITY READINGS 

MINIMUM :• O M•IMUM @ 

083E•VER'S NAME (PR•T} 

CommentS: 
General Shale Brict<, Inc. 

Pro, ject Number: 410 

APPENDIX ,•UBMITTED PROTOCOL 

Air Anal}•sis, [•.•c• 

APPENDIX IX PRODUCTION DATA 

Plant 20 11/2/2006 

Bricks/car Avg. Bdck Weight Cars/day Pounds Brick/day Tons Brick/hour 4 544 3.6 36.43 595,913 12.41 

Plant 32 11/3/2006 

Bricks/car Avg. B.dck Weight Cars/day Pounds Brick/day Tons Brick/hour 5,760 3.5 25.71 518,400 10.80 

36.429 

25.714 
/2:Zo