FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/17/2022 | Document No. 606228 | PAGE Page 1 of 14 * PUBLIC *; 

__________________________________________ 

PUBLIC 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

HomeAdvisor, Inc., a corporation, ) 

d/b/a Angi Leads, ) Docket No. 9407 

d/b/a HomeAdvisor Powered By Angi, ) 

) 

Respondent. ) 

__________________________________________) 

COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S UNOPPOSED 

MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER 

Pursuant to Rule 3.21(c)(2) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 

3.21(c)(2), Complaint Counsel moves to amend the Scheduling Order in this matter and enter the 

attached Proposed Scheduling Order (“Proposed Order”). The Proposed Order would correct a 

discrepancy between previous extensions of the hearing date and the pre-hearing deadlines. 

Additionally, because the initial Scheduling Order in this matter has been amended repeatedly, 

the Proposed Order would integrate all prior amendments and provide a single document for the 

Court and the parties, superceding the initial Scheduling Order. Respondent does not oppose this 

motion. 

Background: The Court first issued its Scheduling Order in this matter on April 25, 

2022. On June 15, the Court amended Paragraph 8 of the Scheduling Order. Order Granting 

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move to Compel Discovery Responses. On 

September 7, 2022, the Court delayed to September 20, 2022, the close of fact discovery “solely 

for the purposes of allowing the completion of the deposition of HomeAdvisor.” Order Granting 

Joint Motion to Extend Time to Complete Fact Discovery. On September 9, 2022, the 
 

 

 

 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/17/2022 | Document No. 606228 | PAGE Page 2 of 14 * PUBLIC *; 

PUBLIC 

Commission ordered that “the evidentiary hearing in this proceeding [...] will be conducted 

virtually by video conference[.]” Order Directing Further Proceedings and Specifying Facts 

Without Substantial Controversy at 1. On September 19, 2022, the Commission delayed the 

evidentiary hearing in this matter to February 22, 2023 – approximately three and a half months 

after its prior November 9, 2022 date – but “unless modified by the Chief Administrative Law 

Judge, all related prehearing deadlines” were extended by exactly three months. Order Granting 

Complaint Counsel’s Expedited Motion to Continue Evidentiary Hearing Date and Prehearing 

Deadlines (“September 19 Order”). Thus, the operative components of the scheduling order are

currently spread across five documents. 

Argument: The Court should enter the Proposed Order because it would promote 

efficiency without disadvantaging or inconveniencing either party or the Court.1 Rule 3.21 

empowers the Court to, “upon a showing of good cause, grant a motion to extend any deadline or 

time specified in this scheduling order other than the date of the evidentiary hearing.” 16 C.F.R. 

§ 3.21(c)(2). In delaying the evidentiary hearing, the Commission explicitly noted the Court’s 

ongoing authority to modify other dates. September 19 Order at 2. The Proposed Order would 

keep the same time between deadlines established in the original Scheduling Order, counting 

backwards from the new evidentiary hearing date.2 Good cause exists because it would be 

inefficient and inconvenient to require all pre-hearing matters to be completed two weeks prior to 

the evidentiary hearing – including the final prehearing conference regularly set for the day 

before the hearing. Moreover, the Proposed Order would promote efficiency and clarity by re1 To the extent any of the proposed dates that require the Court’s involvement are inconvenient for the Court, the 

parties do not object to moving those deadlines to the nearest convenient date. 

2 January 16, 2023, is a federal holiday, so the Proposed Order sets deadlines that would fall on that day to January 

17, 2023, and a response deadline that would fall on January 26, 2023, to January 27, 2023. 

2 
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/17/2022 | Document No. 606228 | PAGE Page 3 of 14 * PUBLIC *; 

PUBLIC 

consolidating the terms of the scheduling order required by Rule 3.21(c)(1) into a single 

document instead of five. Besides the changes to the dates of prehearing deadlines, the Proposed 

Order incorporates the Court’s and Commission’s prior orders without changing the status quo. 

Accordingly, Complaint Counsel moves, and Respondent does not oppose, that the Court enter 

the Proposed Order. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: November 17, 2022 s/ Colin D. A. MacDonald 

Sophia H. Calderón 

Colin D. A. MacDonald 

Breena M. Roos 

M. Elizabeth Howe 

Katharine F. Barach 

Nadine S. Samter 

Ben A. Halpern-Meekin 

Federal Trade Commission 

Northwest Region 

915 Second Ave., Suite 2896 

Seattle, WA 98174 

Tel.: (206) 220-6350 

Fax: (206) 220-6366 

Email: scalderon@ftc.gov 

cmacdonald@ftc.gov 

broos@ftc.gov 

mhowe@ftc.gov 

kbarach@ftc.gov 

nsamter@ftc.gov 

bhalpernmeekin@ftc.gov 

Counsel Supporting the Complaint 

3 
 

 

 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/17/2022 | Document No. 606228 | PAGE Page 4 of 14 * PUBLIC *; 

__________________________________________ 

PUBLIC 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

HomeAdvisor, Inc., a corporation, ) 

d/b/a Angi Leads, ) Docket No. 9407 

d/b/a HomeAdvisor Powered By Angi, ) 

) 

Respondent. ) 

__________________________________________) 

PROPOSED 

SCHEDULING ORDER 

May 10, 2022 - Complaint Counsel provides preliminary witness list (not including 

experts) with a brief summary of the proposed testimony. 

May 24, 2022 - Respondent’s Counsel provides preliminary witness list (not 

including experts) with a brief summary of the proposed testimony. 

June 7, 2022 - Complaint Counsel provides expert witness list. 

June 21, 2022 - Respondent’s Counsel provides expert witness list. 

June 28, 2022 - Deadline for issuing document requests, interrogatories and 

subpoenas, except for discovery for purposes 

of authenticity and admissibility of exhibits. 

August 9, 2022 - Deadline for issuing requests for admissions, except for requests 

for admissions for purposes of authenticity of documents. 

September 6, 2022 - Close of discovery, other than discovery permitted under Rule 

3.24(a)(4), depositions of experts, and discovery for purposes of 

authenticity and admissibility of exhibits. Fact discovery may 

continue until December 20, 2022 solely for the purposes of 

allowing the completion of the deposition of Respondent. 

January 3, 2023 - Deadline for Complaint Counsel to provide expert witness reports. 

January 9, 2023 - Complaint Counsel provides to Respondent’s Counsel its final 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/17/2022 | Document No. 606228 | PAGE Page 5 of 14 * PUBLIC *; 

PUBLIC 

proposed witness and exhibit lists, including depositions, copies of 

all exhibits (except for demonstrative, illustrative or summary 

exhibits and expert related exhibits), Complaint Counsel’s basis of 

admissibility for each proposed exhibit, and a brief summary of the 

testimony of each witness. 

Complaint Counsel serves courtesy copies on ALJ of its final 

proposed witness and exhibit lists, its basis of admissibility for 

each proposed exhibit, and a brief summary of the testimony of 

each witness, including its expert witnesses. 

January 17, 2023 - Deadline for Respondent’s Counsel to provide expert witness 

reports (to be provided by 4 p.m. ET). Respondent’s expert report 

shall include (without limitation) rebuttal, if any, to Complaint 

Counsel’s expert witness report(s).

January 17, 2023 - Respondent’s Counsel provides to Complaint Counsel its final 

proposed witness and exhibit lists, including depositions, copies of 

all exhibits (except for demonstrative, illustrative or summary 

exhibits and expert related exhibits), Respondent’s basis of 

admissibility for each proposed exhibit, and a brief summary of the 

testimony of each witness. 

Respondent’s Counsel serves courtesy copies on ALJ its final 

proposed witness and exhibit lists, its basis of admissibility for 

each proposed exhibit, and a brief summary of the testimony of 

each witness, including its expert witnesses. 

January 19, 2023 - Parties that intend to offer confidential materials of an opposing 

party or non-party as evidence at the hearing must provide notice 

to the opposing party or non-party, pursuant to 16 C.F.R. 

§ 3.45(b).1 See Additional Provision 12. 

January 27, 2023 - Complaint Counsel to identify rebuttal expert(s) and provide 

rebuttal expert report(s). Any such reports are to be limited to 

rebuttal of matters set forth in Respondent’s expert reports. If 

material outside the scope of fair rebuttal is presented, 

Respondents will have the right to seek appropriate relief (such as 

1 Appendix A to Commission Rule 3.31, the Standard Protective Order, states that if a party or third party wishes in 

camera treatment for a document or transcript that a party intends to introduce into evidence, that party or third 

party shall file an appropriate motion with the Administrative Law Judge within 5 days after it receives notice of a 

party’s intent to introduce such material. Commission Rule 3.45(b) states that parties who seek to use material 

obtained from a third party subject to confidentiality restrictions must demonstrate that the third party has been 

given at least 10 days’ notice of the proposed use of such material. To resolve this apparent conflict, the Scheduling

Order requires that the parties provide 10 days’ notice to the opposing party or third parties to allow for the filing of 

motions for in camera treatment. 

2 
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/17/2022 | Document No. 606228 | PAGE Page 6 of 14 * PUBLIC *; 

PUBLIC 

striking Complaint Counsel’s rebuttal expert reports or seeking 

leave to submit surrebuttal expert reports on behalf of 

Respondents). 

January 30, 2023 - Deadline for filing motions for in camera treatment of proposed 

trial exhibits. 

February 3, 2023 - Deadline for filing motions in limine to preclude admission 

of evidence. See Additional Provision 13. 

February 6, 2023 - Deadline for depositions of experts (including rebuttal experts) and 

exchange of expert related exhibits. 

February 8, 2023 - Complaint Counsel files pretrial brief supported by legal authority. 

February 8, 2023 - Deadline for filing responses to motions for in camera treatment of 

proposed trial exhibits. 

February 10, 2023 - Exchange and serve courtesy copy on ALJ objections to final 

proposed witness lists and exhibit lists. The Parties are directed to 

review the Commission’s Rules on admissibility of evidence

before filing objections to exhibits and raise only objections that 

are necessary and valid. 

February 13, 2023 - Deadline for filing responses to motions in limine to preclude 

admission of evidence. 

February 15, 2023 - Exchange proposed stipulations of law, facts, and authenticity. 

February 17, 2023 - Respondent’s Counsel files pretrial brief supported by legal 

authority. 

February 21, 2023 - Final prehearing conference to begin at 1:00 p.m. 

The parties shall meet and confer prior to the prehearing 

conference regarding trial logistics and proposed stipulations of 

law, facts, and authenticity of exhibits. To the extent the parties 

have agreed to stipulate to any issues of law, facts, and/or 

authenticity of exhibits, the parties shall prepare a list of such 

stipulations and submit a copy of the stipulations to the ALJ one 

business day prior to the conference. At the conference, the parties’ 

list of stipulations shall be marked as “JX1” and signed by each 

party, and the list shall be offered into evidence as a joint exhibit. 

No signature by the ALJ is required. Any subsequent stipulations 

3 
 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/17/2022 | Document No. 606228 | PAGE Page 7 of 14 * PUBLIC *; 

PUBLIC 

may be offered as agreed by the parties. 

Counsel may present any objections to the final proposed witness 

lists and exhibits. All trial exhibits will be admitted or excluded to 

the extent practicable. To the extent the parties agree to the 

admission of each other’s exhibits, the parties shall prepare a list 

identifying each exhibit to which admissibility is agreed, marked 

as “JX2” and signed by each party, which list shall be offered into 

evidence as a joint exhibit. No signature by the ALJ is required. 

February 22, 2023 - Commencement of Hearing, to begin at 10:00 a.m.. 

ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS 

1. For all papers that are required to be filed with the Office of the Secretary, the 

parties shall serve a courtesy copy on the Administrative Law Judge by electronic mail to the 

following email address: oalj@ftc.gov. The courtesy copy should be transmitted at or shortly 

after the time of any electronic filing with the Office of the Secretary. Courtesy copies must be 

transmitted to Office of the Administrative Law Judge directly, and the FTC E-filing system 

shall not be used for this purpose. The oalj@ftc.gov email account is to be used only for courtesy 

copies of pleadings filed with the Office of the Secretary and for documents specifically 

requested of the parties by the Office of Administrative Law Judges. Certificates of service for 

any pleading shall not include the OALJ email address, or the email address of any OALJ 

personnel, including the Chief ALJ, but rather shall designate only 600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, 

Rm. H-110 as the place of service. The subject line of all electronic submissions to 

oalj@ftc.gov shall set forth only the docket number and the title of the submission. The 

parties are not required to serve a courtesy copy to the OALJ in hard copy, except upon request. 

In any instance in which a courtesy copy of a pleading for the Administrative Law Judge cannot 

be effectuated by electronic mail, counsel shall hand deliver a hard copy to the Office of 

Administrative Law Judges. Discovery requests and discovery responses shall not be submitted 

to the Office of Administrative Law Judges. 

2. The parties shall serve each other by electronic mail and shall include “Docket 9407”

in the re: line and all attached documents in .pdf format. In the event that service through 

electronic mail is not possible, the parties may serve each other through any method authorized 

under the Commission’s Rules of Practice. 

3. Each pleading that cites to unpublished opinions or opinions not available on 

LEXIS or WESTLAW shall include such copies as exhibits. 

4. Each motion (other than a motion to dismiss, motion for summary decision, or 

a motion for in camera treatment) shall be accompanied by a separate signed statement 

representing that counsel for the moving party has conferred with opposing counsel in an effort 

in good faith to resolve by agreement the issues raised by the motion and has been unable to 

reach such an agreement. In addition, pursuant to Rule 3.22(g), for each motion to quash filed 

4 
 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/17/2022 | Document No. 606228 | PAGE Page 8 of 14 * PUBLIC *; 

PUBLIC 

pursuant to § 3.34(c), each motion to compel or determine sufficiency pursuant to § 3.38(a), or 

each motion for sanctions pursuant to § 3.38(b), the required signed statement must also “recite

the date, time, and place of each . . . conference between counsel, and the names of all parties 

participating in each such conference.” Motions that fail to include such separate statement may 

be denied on that ground. 

5. Rule 3.22(c) states: 

All written motions shall state the particular order, ruling, or action desired and 

the grounds therefor. Memoranda in support of, or in opposition to, any 

dispositive motion shall not exceed 10,000 words. Memoranda in support of, or in 

opposition to, any other motion shall not exceed 2,500 words. Any reply in 

support of a dispositive motion shall not exceed 5,000 words and any reply in 

support of any other motion authorized by the Administrative Law Judge or the 

Commission shall not exceed 1,250 words. 

If a party chooses to submit a motion without a separate memorandum, the word count limits of 

3.22(c) apply to the motion. If a party chooses to submit a motion with a separate memorandum, 

absent prior approval of the ALJ, the motion shall be limited to 750 words, and the word count 

limits of 3.22(c) apply to the memorandum in support of the motion. This provision applies to all 

motions filed with the Administrative Law Judge, including those filed under Rule 3.38. 

6. If papers filed with the Office of the Secretary contain in camera or confidential 

material, the filing party shall mark any such material in the complete version of their submission 

with {bold font and braces}. 16 C.F.R. § 3.45(e). Parties shall be aware of the rules for filings 

containing such information, including 16 C.F.R. § 4.2. 

7. Each party is limited to 50 document requests, including all discrete subparts; 

25 interrogatories, including all discrete subparts; and 50 requests for admissions, including all 

discrete subparts, except that there shall be no limit on the number of requests for admission for 

authentication and admissibility of exhibits. Any single interrogatory inquiring as to a request for 

admissions response may address only a single such response. There is no limit to the number of 

sets of discovery requests the parties may issue, so long as the total number of each type of 

discovery request, including all subparts, does not exceed these limits. Within seven days of 

service of a document request, the parties shall confer about the format for the production of 

electronically stored information. If any federal court proceeding related to this administrative 

proceeding is initiated, any discovery obtained in this proceeding may be used in the related 

federal court litigation, and vice versa. 

8. Compliance with the scheduled end of discovery requires that the parties serve 

subpoenas and discovery requests sufficiently in advance of the discovery cut-off and that all 

responses and objections will be due on or before that date, unless otherwise noted. Any motion 

to compel responses to discovery requests, or to seek certification of a request for court 

enforcement of a nonparty subpoena, shall be filed within 30 days of when the responding party 

declines to make a production or answer an interrogatory, in whole or in part, and no further 

conferral between the parties is planned on the issue, or within 20 days after the close of discovery, 

whichever first occurs; except that, where the parties have been engaging in negotiations over a 

5 
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/17/2022 | Document No. 606228 | PAGE Page 9 of 14 * PUBLIC *; 

PUBLIC 

discovery dispute, including negotiations with any nonparty with regard to a subpoena, the 

deadline for the motion to compel shall be within 5 days of reaching an impasse. 

9. The deposition of any person may be recorded by videotape, provided that the 

deposing party notifies the deponent and all parties of its intention to record the deposition by 

videotape at least five days in advance of the deposition. No deposition, whether recorded by 

videotape or otherwise, may exceed a single, seven-hour day, unless otherwise agreed to by the 

parties or ordered by the Administrative Law Judge. 

10. The parties shall serve upon one another, at the time of issuance, copies of all 

subpoenas duces tecum and subpoenas ad testificandum. For subpoenas ad testificandum, the 

party seeking the deposition shall consult with the other parties before the time and place of the 

deposition is scheduled. The parties need not separately notice the deposition of a non-party 

noticed by an opposing party. Unless the parties otherwise agree, at the request of any party, the 

time and allocation for a non-party deposition shall be divided evenly between them, but the 

noticing party may use any additional time not used by the opposing party. If no party makes 

such a request, cross-examination of the witness will be limited to one hour. 

11. Non-parties shall provide copies or make available for inspection and copying of 

documents requested by subpoena to the party issuing the subpoena. The party that has requested 

documents from non-parties shall provide copies of the documents received from non-parties to 

the opposing party within three business days of receiving the documents. No deposition of a 

non-party shall be scheduled between the time a non-party provides documents in response to a 

subpoena duces tecum to a party, and 3 business days after the party provides those documents to 

the other party, unless a shorter time is required by unforeseen logistical issues in scheduling the 

deposition, or a non-party produces those documents at the time of the deposition, as agreed to 

by all parties involved. 

12. If a party intends to offer confidential materials of an opposing party or nonparty as evidence at the hearing, in providing notice to such non-party, the parties are required to 

inform each non-party of the strict standards for motions for in camera treatment for evidence to 

be introduced at trial set forth in 16 C.F.R. § 3.45; in In re Otto Bock Healthcare North 

American, 2018 WL 3491602 at *1 (July 2, 2018); and In re 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 2017 FTC 

LEXIS 55 (April 4, 2017). Motions also must be supported by a declaration or affidavit by a 

person qualified to explain the confidential nature of the documents. In re 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 

2017 FTC LEXIS 55 (April 4, 2017); In re North Texas Specialty Physicians, 2004 FTC LEXIS 

66 (April 23, 2004). Each party or non-party that files a motion for in camera treatment shall 

provide one copy of the documents for which in camera treatment is sought to the 

Administrative Law Judge. 

13. Motions in limine are strongly discouraged. Motion in limine refers “to any

motion, whether made before or during trial, to exclude anticipated prejudicial evidence before 

the evidence is actually offered.” In re Daniel Chapter One, 2009 FTC LEXIS 85, *18-20 (April 

20, 2009) (citing Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38, 40 n.2 (1984)). Evidence should be 

excluded in advance of trial on a motion in limine only when the evidence is clearly inadmissible 

on all potential grounds. Id. (citing Hawthorne Partners v. AT&T Technologies, Inc., 831 F. 

6 
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/17/2022 | Document No. 606228 | PAGE Page 10 of 14 * PUBLIC *; 

PUBLIC 

Supp. 1398, 1400 (N.D. Ill. 1993); Sec. Exch. Comm’n v. U.S. Environmental, Inc., 2002 U.S. 

Dist. LEXIS 19701, at *5-6 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 16, 2002)). Moreover, the risk of prejudice from 

giving undue weight to marginally relevant evidence is minimal in a bench trial such as this 

where the judge is capable of assigning appropriate weight to evidence. 

14. The final witness lists shall represent counsels’ good faith designation of all 

potential witnesses who counsel reasonably expect may be called in their case-in-chief. A 

general designation that a party reserves the right to call anyone on the opposing party’s witness 

list is not sufficient. Parties shall notify the opposing party promptly of changes in witness lists 

to facilitate completion of discovery within the dates of the scheduling order. The final proposed 

witness list may not include additional witnesses not listed in the preliminary or supplemental 

witness lists previously exchanged unless by consent of all parties, or, if the parties do not 

consent, by an order of the Administrative Law Judge upon a showing of good cause. 

15. If any party wishes to offer a rebuttal witness other than a rebuttal expert, the party 

shall file a request in writing in the form of a motion to request a rebuttal witness. That motion 

shall be filed as soon as possible after the testimony sought to be rebutted is known and shall 

include: (a) the name of any witness being proposed (b) a detailed description of the rebuttal 

evidence being offered; (c) citations to the record, by page and line number, to the evidence that 

the party intends to rebut; and shall demonstrate that the witness the party seeks to call has 

previously been designated on its witness list or adequately explain why the requested witness 

was not designated on its witness list. 

16. Witnesses shall not testify to a matter unless evidence is introduced sufficient 

to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter. F.R.E. 602. 

17. Witnesses not properly designated as expert witnesses shall not provide 

opinions beyond what is allowed in F.R.E. 701. 

18. The parties are required to comply with Rule 3.31A and with the following: 

(a) At the time an expert is first listed as a witness by a party, that party shall 

provide to the other party: 

(i) materials fully describing or identifying the background and qualifications of the 

expert, all publications authored by the expert within the preceding ten years, and all prior cases 

in which the expert has testified or has been deposed within the preceding four years; and 

(ii) transcripts of such testimony in the possession, custody, or control of the producing 

party or the expert, except that transcript sections that are under seal in a separate proceeding 

need not be produced. 

(b) At the time an expert report is produced, the producing party shall provide to the 

other party all documents and other written materials relied upon by the expert in formulating an 

opinion in this case, subject to the provisions of 19(g), except that documents and materials 

already produced in the case need only be listed by Bates number. 

7 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/17/2022 | Document No. 606228 | PAGE Page 11 of 14 * PUBLIC *; 

PUBLIC 

(c) It shall be the responsibility of a party designating an expert witness to ensure that the 

expert witness is reasonably available for deposition in keeping with this Scheduling Order. 

Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties or ordered by the Administrative Law Judge, expert 

witnesses shall be deposed only once and each expert deposition shall be limited to one day for 

seven hours. 

(d) Each expert report shall include a complete statement of all opinions to be expressed 

and the basis and reasons therefore; the data or other information considered by the expert in 

forming the opinions; any exhibits to be used as a summary of or support for the opinions; the 

qualifications of the expert; and the compensation to be paid for the study and testimony. 

(e) A party may not discover facts known or opinions held by an expert who has been 

retained or specially employed by another party in anticipation of this litigation or preparation 

for hearing and who is not designated by a party as a testifying witness. 

(f) At the time of service of the expert reports, a party shall provide opposing counsel: 

(i) a list of all commercially-available computer programs used by the expert in the 

preparation of the report; 

(ii) a copy of all data sets used by the expert, in native file format and processed data 

file format; and 

(iii) all customized computer programs used by the expert in the preparation of the 

report or necessary to replicate the findings on which the expert report is based. 

(g) Experts’ disclosures and reports shall comply in all respects with Rule 3.31A, except 

that neither side must preserve or disclose: 

(i) any form of communication or work product shared between any of the parties’ 

counsel and their expert(s), or between any of the experts themselves; 

(ii) any form of communication or work product shared between an expert(s) 

and persons assisting the expert(s); 

(iii) expert’s notes, unless they constitute the only record of a fact or an assumption 

relied upon by the expert in formulating an opinion in this case; 

(iv) drafts of expert reports, analyses, or other work product; or 

(v) data formulations, data runs, data analyses, or any database-related operations 

not relied upon by the expert in the opinions contained in his or her final report. 

19. If the expert reports prepared for either party contain confidential information 

that has been granted in camera treatment, the party shall prepare two versions of its expert 

report(s) in accordance with Additional Provision 6 of this Scheduling Order and 16 C.F.R. 

§ 3.45(e). 

20. Pursuant to the Commission’s September 9, 2022 Order Directing Further 

Proceedings and Specifying Facts Without Substantial Controversy, the evidentiary hearing in 

this matter will be conducted remotely by video conference. The parties are encouraged, in 

8 
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/17/2022 | Document No. 606228 | PAGE Page 12 of 14 * PUBLIC *; 

PUBLIC 

advance of the hearing, to take expert depositions for the purpose of perpetuating trial testimony 

(i.e., a trial deposition) and to submit such trial testimony as an exhibit in lieu of presenting the 

expert’s testimony via live video at trial. This trial deposition may be conducted in addition to 

any deposition of an expert witness for purposes of discovery (discovery deposition). Although 

the parties are encouraged to submit trial depositions in lieu of live video testimony at trial for all 

expert witnesses in the case, you may choose to do trial depositions for all or fewer than all 

experts. 

21. Pursuant to the Commission’s September 9, 2022 Order Directing Further 

Proceedings and Specifying Facts Without Substantial Controversy, the evidentiary hearing in 

this matter will be conducted remotely by video conference. To accommodate safety or other 

concerns of witnesses and attorneys and staff, the parties may, in advance of the hearing, take 

trial depositions of fact witnesses who had been deposed before the close of discovery and to 

submit such trial deposition testimony (as video and/or transcript of trial deposition testimony) as 

an exhibit in lieu of presenting the fact witness’ testimony via live video at trial. Although the 

parties may submit trial depositions in lieu of live video testimony at trial for all fact witnesses in 

the case, you may choose to do trial depositions for fewer than all fact witnesses. 

21A. All trial depositions shall occur between the close of discovery and the close of 

the hearing; a party noticing a trial deposition shall give five days’ notice to the other party. The 

parties shall work cooperatively to accommodate each other’s schedules when noticing trial 

depositions. 

20. An expert witness’s testimony is limited to opinions contained in the expert report 

that has been previously and properly provided to the opposing party. In addition, no opinion 

will be considered, even if included in an expert report, if the underlying and supporting 

documents and information have not been properly provided to the opposing party. Unless an 

expert witness is qualified as a fact witness, an expert witness is only allowed to provide opinion 

testimony; expert testimony is not considered for the purpose of establishing the underlying facts 

of the case. 

21. The final exhibit lists shall represent counsels’ good faith designation of all 

trial exhibits other than demonstrative, illustrative, or summary exhibits. Additional exhibits may 

be added after the submission of the final lists only by consent of all parties, or, if the parties do 

not consent, by an order of the Administrative Law Judge upon a showing of good cause. 

22. Properly admitted deposition testimony and properly admitted investigational 

hearing transcripts are part of the record and need not be read in open court. Videotape 

deposition excerpts that have been admitted in evidence may be presented in open court only 

upon prior approval by the Administrative Law Judge. 

23. The parties shall provide to one another, and to the Administrative Law Judge and the 

court reporter, no later than 48 hours in advance, not including weekends and holidays, a list of 

all witnesses to be called on each day of hearing, subject to possible delays or unforeseen 

circumstances. 

9 
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/17/2022 | Document No. 606228 | PAGE Page 13 of 14 * PUBLIC *; 

PUBLIC 

24. The parties shall provide one another with copies of any demonstrative, illustrative or 

summary exhibits (other than those prepared for cross-examination) 24 hours before they are 

used with a witness. 

25. Complaint Counsel’s exhibits shall bear the designation PX and Respondent’s 

exhibits shall bear the designation RX or some other appropriate designation. Complaint 

Counsel’s demonstrative exhibits shall bear the designation PXD and Respondent’s 

demonstrative exhibits shall bear the designation RXD or some other appropriate designation. If 

demonstrative exhibits are used with a witness, the exhibit will be marked and referred to for 

identification only. Any demonstrative exhibits referred to by any witness may be included in the 

trial record, but they are not part of the evidentiary record and may not be cited to support any 

disputed fact. Both sides shall number the first page of each exhibit with a single series of 

consecutive numbers. When an exhibit consists of more than one piece of paper, each page of the 

exhibit must bear a consecutive control number or some other consecutive page number. 

26. At the final prehearing conference, counsel will be required to introduce all 

exhibits they intend to introduce at trial.The parties shall confer and shall eliminate duplicative 

exhibits in advance of the final prehearing conference and, if necessary, during trial. For 

example, if PX100 and RX200 are different copies of the same document, only one of those 

documents shall be offered into evidence. The parties shall agree in advance as to which exhibit 

number they intend to use. Counsel shall contact the court reporter regarding submission of 

exhibits. 

10 
 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/17/2022 | Document No. 606228 | PAGE Page 14 of 14 * PUBLIC *; 

PUBLIC 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on November 17, 2022, I filed the foregoing document electronically 

using the FTC’s E-Filing system, which will send notification of such filing to: 

April Tabor The Honorable D. Michael Chappell 

Office of the Secretary Administrative Law Judge 

Federal Trade Commission Federal Trade Commission 

Constitution Center 600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Rm. H-110 

400 Seventh Street, SW, Suite 5610 Washington, DC 20580 

Washington, D.C. 20024 

ElectronicFilings@ftc.gov 

I further certify that on November 17, 2022, I caused the foregoing document to be 

served via email to: 

William A. Burck 

Dawn Y. Yamane Hewett 

Kyra R. Simon 

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 

1300 I Street NW, 9th Floor 

Washington, DC 20005 

(202) 538-8000 

williamburck@quinnemanuel.com 

dawnhewett@quinnemanuel.com 

kyrasimon@quinnemanuel.com 

Counsel for Respondent HomeAdvisor, Inc. 

Dated: November 17, 2022 

Stephen R. Neuwirth 

Jennifer J. Barrett 

Neil T. Phillips 

George T. Phillips 

Jared Ruocco 

Kathryn D. Bonacorsi 

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 

51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor 

New York, NY 10010 

(212) 849-7000 

stephenneuwirth@quinnemanuel.com 

jenniferbarrett@quinnemanuel.com 

neilphillips@quinnemanuel.com 

georgephillips@quinnemanuel.com 

jaredruocco@quinnemanuel.com 

kathrynbonacorsi@quinnemanuel.com 

By: s/ Colin D. A. MacDonald 

Colin D. A. MacDonald 

Counsel Supporting the Complaint