alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 2/8/2023 | Document No. 606878 | PAGE Page 1 of 1 * PUBLIC *; 

__________________________________________ 

PUBLIC 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Microsoft Corp., )

 a corporation, and ) 

) Docket No. 9412 

Activision Blizzard, Inc., )

 a corporation, ) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

__________________________________________) 

ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

On February 6, 2023, non-party Nintendo of America Inc. (“NOA”) filed a motion to 

extend the time for it to file a motion to quash or to limit a subpoena served on NOA by 

Respondent Activision Corp. (“Activision”) (“Motion”). NOA states that Activision and NOA 

are engaged in ongoing negotiations as to the timing and scope of document production and that 

further negotiations may narrow or eliminate areas of dispute. NOA further states that Activision 

agrees to the extension requested in the Motion. 

Upon review and consideration of the Motion, the Motion is GRANTED. It is hereby 

ORDERED that NOA’s deadline to file a motion to quash or to limit Activision’s subpoena is 

extended to February 16, 2023. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: February 8, 2023
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 828 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 828

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that service 
performed for an elementary or secondary school operated primarily for 
    religious purposes is exempt from the Federal unemployment tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1993

  Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that service 
performed for an elementary or secondary school operated primarily for 
    religious purposes is exempt from the Federal unemployment tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) section 
3309(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exemption 
from unemployment tax) is amended by inserting before the semicolon at 
the end thereof the following: ``, or (C) an elementary or secondary 
school which is operated primarily for religious purposes, which is 
described in section 501(c)(3), and which is exempt from tax under 
section 501(a)''.
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to services 
performed after December 31, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             498
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,050
<INVENTORY>                                    125,049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               207,792
<PP&E>                                         330,767
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 554,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,513
<BONDS>                                        208,275
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           106
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   554,872
<SALES>                                        189,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               189,403
<CGS>                                          159,579
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  159,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,795
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    50
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,845
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,193
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,652
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,073)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,579
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 July 2, 2008

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio         43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.     Other Events
- -------   --------------------------------------------

          As of June 30, 2008, preliminary assets under management totaled
$5.486 billion.  Following is a summary as of June 30, 2008 (in millions):

				         Equity    Fixed Income	    Total
Individually Managed Accounts 	        $ 1,034	      $  112       $ 1,146
Mutual Funds (including sub-advised)      3,757	         142         3,899
Private Investment Funds	   	    441            0           441
                                        -------       ------       -------
Total			       	        $ 5,232       $  254       $ 5,486

Investment Strategy
-------------------
Small and Small-Mid Cap         $    548
Large Cap and Select		   1,221
Long-Short		           3,466
Strategic and Fixed Income     	     251
				--------
Total			           5,486


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: July 2, 2008	                    By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                            Officer and Secretary
**Exhibit 10.129**

 

**2005Executive Officer and Director Compensation Summary**

 

**1.****                                      ExecutiveOfficer Compensation**

 

Effective January 1, 2005, the followingexecutive officers’ base salaries were increased to the following amounts (suchamounts reflect base salary only and do not include perquisites benefits orbonus opportunities).

 
| **Officer**            | ** ** | **Salary** | ** ** |
|------------------------|------------|------------|------------|
|                   |       |       |       |
| Ed H. Bowman, Jr. |       | $          | 675,000    |   |
| Thomas C.  Walker      |       | $          | 350,000    |   |
| Barry L.  Edwards      |       | $          | 360,000    |   |
| Kerry D.  Walbridge    |       | $          | 320,000    |   |
| David  Delgado         |       | $          | 275,000    |   |
| Ronald Zazworsky       |       | $          | 285,000    |   |
| Charles S.  Gilbert    |       | $          | 260,000    |   |
| W. Bryan  Hill         |       | $          | 200,000    |   |
| Ralph D.  Burns        |       | $          | 270,000    |   |
| Stephen W. Davis       |       | $          | 270,000    |   |

 

**2.****                                      DirectorCompensation**

 

Directors who are employees of the Company donot receive additional compensation for serving as Directors.  Each Director who is not an employee of theCompany receives a fee of $2,500 for attendance at each Board of Directors’Meeting; and $1,250 for attendance at committee meetings (unless held on thesame day as a Board of Directors’ meeting), with the Committee Chairmanreceiving $1,250 for separate, individual meetings.  Non-employee Directors also receive an annualgrant of shares of restricted stock (typically vesting in 20%/30%/50% annualincrements), the number of shares awarded currently is set to equal $40,000divided by the average closing price of the Company’s Common Stock for the 10days prior to the applicable annual meeting.

 

**3.****                                      ConsultingAgreement with Non-Employee Director**

 

David Lowenstein, a non-employee Director,entered into a consulting agreement with the Company in January 2000.  Under an addendum to this agreement, Mr. Lowensteinis compensated for his non-Board related services at an hourly rate for work donenot related to acquisitions.  Effective December 28,2004 this hourly rate was increased to $180.00 per hour.

 

----
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                   NUMBER NINE VISUAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
 
           STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (1)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       YEAR ENDED
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         DECEMBER 28, DECEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
                                             1996         1995         1994
                                         ------------ ------------ ------------
                                         (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S>                                      <C>          <C>          <C>
HISTORICAL
Common Stock Outstanding beginning of
 the period............................      8,758        5,490        5,490
Weighted average cheap stock...........        --           594        1,497
Weighted average redeemable common
 stock.................................        --           492            4
Weighted average number of common stock
 issued................................        212        1,406          --
Weighted average of common stock
 equivalents...........................        --           --           510
Less: assumed purchase of treasury
 shares................................        --           --           (74)
                                           -------       ------       ------
Weighted average number of common and
 common equivalent shares outstanding..      8,970        7,983        7,428
                                           =======       ======       ======
Net income (loss)......................    $(8,651)      $5,073)      $1,700
                                           =======       ======       ======
Net income (loss) per share............    $ (0.96)      $(0.64)      $ 0.23
                                           =======       ======       ======
</TABLE>
--------
(1) Primary and fully diluted calculations are substantially the same.
(2) In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting
    Bulletin No. 83, issuances of common stock and common stock equivalents,
    within one year prior to the initial filing of the registration statement,
    at share prices below the assumed mid-point of the initial public offering
    price of $11 per share (cheap stock), are considered to have been made in
    anticipation of the Company's initial public offering. Accordingly, these
    stock issuances are treated as-if issued and outstanding, using the
    treasury stock method for stock options, since the inception of the
    Company.
<PAGE>
                      EXHIBIT 23
                 
              Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on
Form S-4 (File No. 33-91250) of Rochester Telephone Corp. of
our report dated January 22, 1996 appearing on pages 23 and 24
of Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference
of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears
on page 19 of this Form 10-K.



/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP


PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Rochester, New York       
March 22, 1996
EXHIBIT 10.17


                          TERMINATION OF STOCK PURCHASE
                                       AND
                             SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT

      Reference is made to the Stock Purchase and Subscription Agreement dated
September 3, 1996, between the undersigned (the "Agreement") and the Promissory
Note dated September 3, 1996 of Donald Lies (the "Note") attached to the
Agreement as Exhibit A. The undersigned hereby acknowledge that the transactions
contemplated in the Agreement were not consummated and that the Agreement and
the Note are each terminated and cancelled effective as of October 31, 1996.


RSI SYSTEMS, INC.



By:
   ---------------------------------         ----------------------------------
   Richard Braun                             Donald Lies
   Chairman
# Official Journal C 258/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 258 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 608 August 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 258

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 608 August 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| 2017/C 258/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) for the financial year 2017 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

2017/C 258/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) for the financial year 2017

1

---

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit4(d)(2)**

 

**GATEWAYENERGY CORPORATION**

**SUBSCRIPTIONAGREEMENT**

 

**CommonStock**

 

Gateway Energy Corporation

One Allen Center

500 Dallas Street, Suite 2615

Houston, Texas 77002

 

The undersigned John A. Raasch (“Subscriber”)does hereby irrevocably agree to subscribe for and purchase 150,000 shares ofGateway Energy Corporation Common Stock at $0.30 per share, or $45,000 (the “SubscriptionPrice”). The undersigned and Gateway Energy Corporation (the “Company”)expressly agree that this Subscription Agreement shall be null and void unlessand until Josh H. Buterin places into a bank account of the Company the sum of$115,000 pursuant to a Gateway Energy Corporation Convertible Promissory Notedated September 27, 2004.  Upon thepayment of such amount by Josh H. Buterin, this Subscription Agreement shall befully enforceable, and payment of the Subscription Price into the same bankaccount of the Company shall be required.

 

Upon payment of the Subscription Price, theCompany shall issue to the undersigned the number of Shares specified in thefirst paragraph of this Subscription Agreement with an appropriate legendindicating that the securities have not been registered under the SecuritiesAct of 1933 and are resalable either pursuant to an effective registrationstatement or exemption from registration under Rule 144.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Subscriber has executedthis Subscription Agreement as of the 1st day of November, 2004.

 

 
| ** ** | **SUBSCRIBER**      |
|------------|---------------------|
|       |                |
|       |                |
|       | /s/ John A.  Raasch |   |
|       | John A. Raasch      |
|            |                     |  |  |

 

 

Accepted this 1st day of November, 2004.

 

**GATEWAY ENERGY CORPORATION**

 

 
| By:    | /s/ John A.  Raasch       |   |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | John A. Raasch, President |   |

 

----
#### David Lamont DePUY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-208.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 10, 1973.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Ronald B. Cosgrove, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Enoch J. Whitney, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee,

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. den. 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377.

CARROLL, DONALD, K., A. C. J., and WIGGINTON. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6990

BENJAMIN EARL COX,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DANIEL L. STIENEKE; MACK JARVIS; DAVID

CHESTER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-98-267-5-F)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin Earl Cox, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Earl Cox filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices

of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are

“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of

Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have

thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of

appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1).

The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district

court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on May 11, 1998; Cox’s

notice of appeal was filed on June 29, 1998, which is beyond the

thirty-day appeal period. His failure to note a timely appeal or

obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves this court without

jurisdiction to consider the merits of Cox’s appeal. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
263 La. 67

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Henry Charles WALKER.

No. 52430.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 4, 1972.

Anthony R. Messina, New Orleans, for de f endant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Harry H. Howard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jim Garri*198son, Dist. Atty., Louise Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Henry Charles Walker, appeals his conviction of simple burglary, La.R.S. 14:62 for which he was sentenced to serve eight years in the State Penitentiary. The defendant relies upon two bills of exceptions in pursuing his appeal.

Bill of Exceptions No. 1 alleges the trial judge erred when he permitted two slides containing fingerprints found at the scene of the burglary to be introduced into evidence. Counsel for the defense maintains the slides are objectionable because, “there was no positive proof of being those (the prints) that were taken from a particular place at the scene of the burglary.”

Counsel for the defense does not attack the testimony of Officer Daniel O’Neil, the fingerprint expert. His objection seems to be centered around the “chain of custody” of the physical fingerprint evidence. He contends the State did not sufficiently show that the fingerprint evidence sought to be admitted was the same as that evidence taken at the scene of the burglary. This contention is without merit. On direct examination, Officer O’Neil stated he personally “lifted” the fingerprints from various objects at the scene of the burglary. The crucial print slides which led to the identification of the defendant as the perpetrator of the burglary were labeled by Officer O’Neil and identified as to their source at the time he took the fingerprints. The same testimony was repeated on cross-examination, re-direct examination and re-cross examination.

We find that this demonstrative evidence was properly identified by the testimony of Officer O’Neil. For admission into evidence, it suffices if the custodial evidence establishes that it is more probable than not that the object is the one connected with the case. State v. Dotson, 260 La. 471, 256 So.2d 594 (1971).

Regarding the “chain of custody”, Officer O’Neil explained the procedures followed by the latent print section of the Crime Lab, specified the location, method of preservation, classification, and those who had access to the prints while in police custody. He unequivocally stated the prints offered by the State were those he took at the scene of the burglary. Such testimony amply lays the foundation for admitting the slides into evidence. La.C. Cr.P. art. 773; State v. Dotson, supra. Thus admitted, the connexity of this physical evidence to the culpability of the defendant is a factual matter for determination by the jury. State v. Dotson, supra.

Bill of Exceptions No. 2 was taken to the denial of a motion for new trial based on the grounds advocated in Bill No. 1. For the reasons stated this second bill also lacks merit.

For the reasons assigned, conviction and sentence are affirmed.