alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GAO's mission is to provide Congress with fact-based, nonpartisan information that can help improve federal government performance and ensure accountability for the benefit of the American people. GAO launched its WatchBlog in January, 2014, as part of its continuing effort to reach its audiences—Congress and the American people—where they are currently looking for information.

The blog format allows GAO to provide a little more context about its work than it can offer on its other social media platforms. Posts will tie GAO work to current events and the news; show how GAO’s work is affecting agencies or legislation; highlight reports, testimonies, and issue areas where GAO does work; and provide information about GAO itself, among other things.

Please send any feedback on GAO's WatchBlog to blog@gao.gov.

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Communications Commission 47 CFR Part 73
[DA 18-543; MB Docket No. 18-27; RM-11796]
 AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
 ACTION: Final rule.
 SUMMARY: At the request of L. Topaz Enterprises, Inc., the Audio Division amends the FM Table of Allotments by adding Channel 292A at Desert Hills, Arizona. We find that the public interest would be served by allotting a second local service at Desert Hills, Arizona. A staff engineering analysis indicates that Channel 292A can be added at Desert Hills, Arizona, as proposed, consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's rules without a site restriction. The reference coordinates are 34-32-58 NL and 114-22-2 WL.
 DATES: Effective July 9, 2018.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adrienne Y. Denysyk, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2700.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
                    *Report and Order,*
                     MB Docket No. 18-27, adopted May 25, 2018, and released May 25, 2018. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The full text is also available online at 
                    *http://apps.fcc.gov/​ecfs/​.*
                     This document does not contain information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. The Commission will send a copy of the 
                    *Report and Order*
                     in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, 
                    *see*5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Radio
Radio broadcasting
 Federal Communications Commission. Nazifa Sawez, Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
 For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 73 as follows: PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES
 1.The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                        47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 309, 310, 334, 336, and 339. 2.Section 73.202(b), the table is amended under Arizona, by adding Desert Hills, Channel 292A, in alphabetical order to read as follows: § 73.202
  
 (b) * * * Channel No.*    *    *    *    ***Arizona***    *    *    *    *Desert Hills
292A*    *    *    *    *


[FR Doc. 2018-13794 Filed 6-27-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Record of Meeting 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0350

On April 8, 2013, the Presidents of AOPA and EAA met with the Administrator and 

AVS representatives to discuss a Request for Exemption filed by the two organizations.

The organizations requested exemption from various Federal Aviation Regulations 

related to FAA-issued medical certificates. The executives stated they believe that data 

from the Sport Pilot community -- where pilots may fly without a third class medical 

certificate -- supports the request for exemption. They stated that requiring a recurrent 

educational program paired with a thorough self-assessment as a condition of the 

exemption is a responsible alternative to requiring a medical certificate. They stated that 

AOPA and EAA have the mechanism in place to provide the training and to track that 

members using the exemption have completed the training. They stated that by granting 

the exemption, the FAA would reduce the likelihood that pilots would transition from an 

aircraft where they had long experience to a light sport aircraft. They pointed out that 

transition from one aircraft to another is a known risk that can result in fatal accidents.

The executives asked that should the FAA at some point contemplate a denial of the 

petition that the Administrator consider approving the request and limiting the number of 

pilots to whom it would apply or issue it for a limited period of time so that more data 

could be collected to support general rulemaking that might change the requirements for 

the third class medical certificate for all pilots.

The Administrator assured them that FAA would give full consideration to the request for 

exemption.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 768 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 768

 To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
Liability Act of 1980 to require certain States to contribute to other 
                    States' shares of cleanup costs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February, 3, 1993

   Mr. English of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred jointly to the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Public 
                        Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
Liability Act of 1980 to require certain States to contribute to other 
                    States' shares of cleanup costs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN STATES TO CONTRIBUTE TO SUPERFUND 
              CLEANUP COSTS.

    Section 104(c) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9604(c)) is amended 
by adding at the end the following:
    ``(4)(A) For purposes of clause (i) of paragraph (3)(C), in the 
case of a remedial action at a facility at which a hazardous waste was 
disposed of, if such waste was generated in another State, the State in 
which the facility is located may recover the amount described in 
subparagraph (B) from such other State. Such other State shall pay such 
amount to the State in which the facility is located.
    ``(B) The amount referred to in subparagraph (A) is that share of 
the amount the State in which the facility is located will pay or 
assure payment of under clause (i) of paragraph (3)(C) that is 
attributable to the remedial action costs associated with the hazardous 
waste disposed of at the facility but generated in the other State.''.

                                 <all>
```
256 La. 910

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Raymond D. UTZ v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50959.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 9, 1970.

In re: Raymond D. Utz applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Granted. The trial court is ordered to hold an evidentiary hearing.

ORDER

On considering the petition of relator in the above numbered and entitled cause:

It is ordered that the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Parish of Sabine, without undue delay, grant a full evidentiary hearing on relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in that Court and in this Court, and make a determination of the merits of his application after the hearing.
file:///C|/Temp/090000648101a045.txt[8/7/2013 11:10:04 AM]

From: "Bromberg, Kevin L." <kevin.bromberg@sba.gov> 

To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>, JohnB 

Chamberlin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 04/19/2012 04:48 PM 

Subject: RE: RICE Reconsideration

I didn’t want to bother Cortney with this type of question. Now everyone can have these handy 

tables. Thx 

Hi Cortney! 

From: Melanie King [mailto:King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:44 PM 

To: Bromberg, Kevin L. 

Cc: RobertJ Wayland; Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov; JohnB Chamberlin 

Subject: Re: RICE Reconsideration

Hi, 

EPA Region 1 has a good website that has some handy tables, which are taken from a presentation I 

did. Links to both are below. Also, I believe since the rule it at OMB now for interagency review, it would 

be a good idea if you could route questions through Cortney. 

http://www.epa.gov/region1/rice/ 

http://www.epa.gov/apti/video/pdfs/RICENESHAP-NETIwebinar12-7-11.pdf 

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov 

 "Bromberg, Kevin L." ---04/19/2012 04:26:16 PM---Hi Melanie - Is there a good table on the EPA 

website listing the current SI and CI 

From: "Bromberg, Kevin L." <kevin.bromberg@sba.gov> 

To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 04/19/2012 04:26 PM 

Subject: RICE Reconsideration
file:///C|/Temp/090000648101a045.txt[8/7/2013 11:10:04 AM]

Hi Melanie - 

Is there a good table on the EPA website listing the current SI and CI RICE requirements by 

engine size, and status (existing, new)? I’m reviewing the new proposal. Hope all is well. 

Kevin 

Kevin Bromberg | Assistant Chief Counsel for Environmental Policy | SBA Office of Advocacy | 409 3rd St. SW, 

Washington, DC 20416 | p 202/205-6964 | f 202/481-2963 | kevin.bromberg@sba.gov | website | listserv | blog | 

Facebook | twitter |
# Official Journal L 108/25 A

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 108 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5025 April 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 108

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5025 April 2007

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

DIRECTIVES

*

Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 10.157


 


Summary of Material
Terms – Consulting Agreement with Philippe Benacin Holding SAS


 


1. Philippe Benacin
Holding SAS (“Consultant”) is act as a consultant to Inter Parfums, Inc. (“Company”), and to provide services
commensurate with the responsibilities and obligations of the President of Company in such places as may be agreed upon between
Company and Consultant, provided that no services shall be rendered within the United States.


 


2. The term of this
Agreement is for a period of one (1) year commencing as of January 1, 2014, and shall continue in effect for subsequent annual
periods unless


 


(a)     either party
provides the other party with 120 days advance notice, or


 


(b)     Philippe
Benacin, the President of Company, ceases to be the President of Company, in which case this Agreement shall terminate coterminous
with such cessation.


 


3. Compensation: For
2014, Company agrees to pay to Consultant $250,000, payable in equal monthly installments. For subsequent years, the remuneration
to be paid from Company to Consultant shall be as negotiated between Consultant and the Executive Compensation and Stock Option
Committee of the Board of Directors of Company.
# Official Journal L 221/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.221.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 221 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5517 August 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.221.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 221

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5517 August 2012

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | 2012/467/EU, Euratom |
| | * | Definitive adoption of amending budget No 3 of the European Union for the financial year 2012 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

BUDGETS

2012/467/EU, Euratom

*

Definitive adoption of amending budget No 3 of the European Union for the financial year 2012

1

| All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.


  Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.


  Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue. |
| --- |

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Edward J. WYSOCKI, Appellant, v. J. M. HENDERSON, Sr., d/b/a J. M. Henderson & Son, Appellee.

No. 70-999.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 1971.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; James M. Reasbeck, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eddie Lee WADDLES.

No. 61897.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 14, 1978.

Robert E. Piper, Jr., of Piper & Brown, Shreveport, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara B. Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John A. Richardson, Dist. Atty., Donald C. Brown, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31(a)
CERTIFICATIONS

I, John D. Baker, II, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Florida Rock Industries,
Inc;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a.	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b.	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluations; and

c.	disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

a.	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information and

b.	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:  April 27, 2004
                                       JOHN D. BAKER, II
                                                JOHN D. BAKER, II
                                                President and Chief
                                                Executive Officer
1
#### Walter KUSE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1379.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 22, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### T. H. SIMS, Individually and d/b/a Sims Crane Service, Appellant, v. TAMPA UNIFORM SERVICE, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-327.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 23, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Raymond J. MOORE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53141.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1973.

In re: Raymond J. Moore applying for remedial writs and writ of habeas corpus.

Writ granted. See order.

On considering the petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered cause,

It is ordered that the Fifteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Acadia forthwith have preserved and lodged with this Court an out of time appeal on behalf of the relator, Raymond J. Moore.