alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-64-2018]

On April 30, 2018, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Eastern Distribution Center, Inc., grantee of FTZ 24, requesting an expansion of Subzone 24E on behalf of Brake Parts Inc in Hazleton, Pennsylvania.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (83 FR 19524, May 3, 2018). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to expand Subzone 24E was approved on June 26, 2018, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 24's 2,000-acre activation limit.                

Dated: June 26, 2018.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-14026 Filed 6-28-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Paul N. Greenberg, D.P.M., P.C., Appellant, v Luis Montalvo, D.P.M., Respondent.

[737 NYS2d 75]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered July 31, 2001, denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, an order sanctioning defendant for noncompliance with court-ordered discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action between podiatrists to recover amounts allegedly billed to insurance carriers in defendant’s name for services rendered by defendant to plaintiff’s patients, which amounts, pursuant to the agreement alleged by plaintiff, should have been assigned by defendant to plaintiff, summary judgment, sought upon the ground that defendant, in alleged violation of court-ordered discovery, has withheld material within his exclusive control essential to plaintiffs case, was properly denied. There are triable issues as to the billing procedures employed by the parties and thus as to the validity of plaintiffs claim that information necessary to his case is in fact in defendant’s exclusive control. Moreover, defendant’s affidavit, stating that he possesses no additional responsive documentation, is adequate to fulfill his obligations under the allegedly violated discovery order. Accordingly, sanctions against defendant are not warranted at this time *(see, Citibank v Johnson,*206 AD2d 942). However, if any such information should be forthcoming by the time of trial, an appropriate sanction can be imposed by the trial court. Concur — Williams, J.P., Ellerin, Lerner, Rubin and Marlow, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,881
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                       737
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,996
<PP&E>                                           3,439
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,074
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,903
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,152
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,067
<INCOME-TAX>                                       825
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,242
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,242
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 69 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 69

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide reclassification of 
   members of the Board of Veterans Appeals and to ensure pay equity 
          between those members and administrative law judges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

Mr. Bilirakis introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly 
   to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs and Post Office and Civil 
                                Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide reclassification of 
   members of the Board of Veterans Appeals and to ensure pay equity 
          between those members and administrative law judges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLASSIFICATION AND PAY OF MEMBERS OF BOARD OF VETERANS' 
              APPEALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 7101(b)(2)(A) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: ``A member of the 
Board (other than the Chairman and Vice Chairman) shall receive 
compensation under the provisions of section 5372 of title 5 and other 
benefits equal to those payable to an administrative law judge.''.
    (b) Savings Provision.--The rate of basic pay payable to an 
individual who is a member of the Board of Veterans' Appeals on the 
date of the enactment of this Act may not be reduced by reason of the 
amendment made by subsection (a) below the rate payable to such 
individual on the day before the effective date specified in subsection 
(c).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the first day of the first pay period beginning after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### Valencia DRUMGO, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al., Respondent.

No. S-237.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 17, 1973.

Steven Goldberg, for petitioner.

Kenneth H. Hart, Jr., and Vera Winter Lee, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This ás a certiorari review of an order of the Industrial Relations Commission affirming a decision of an administrative referee denying petitioner unemployment compensation benefits.

We have reviewed the record, briefs and considered the oral argument in this cause, and upon consideration thereof it is our conclusion that petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the order reviewed herein is erroneous. The record reflects evidence which, supports the entry of said order. De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So.2d 912 (Fla.1957).

Accordingly, petition for writ of certi-orari is denied.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JT., concur.
EXHIBIT 11.1


STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
AG-CHEM EQUIPMENT CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                1999                  1998                   1997
                                                                ----                  ----                   ----
<S>                                                           <C>                   <C>                     <C>
Shares outstanding at beginning of year                       9,640,268             9,670,268               9,695,768

Repurchase and retirement of common stock                       (44,800)              (30,000)                (25,500)

Shares outstanding at end of year                             9,595,468             9,640,268               9,670,268
                                                         ---------------        --------------        ----------------

Weighed average common shares outstanding                     9,616,313             9,660,152               9,683,341
                                                         ===============        ==============        ================

Net earnings                                                     $3,388                $6,848                  $7,570
                                                         ===============        ==============        ================

Earnings per common share                                         $0.35                 $0.71                   $0.78
                                                         ===============        ==============        ================

</TABLE>



The Company has no potentially dilutive common shares.



                                      FS-4
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Tour requort sor 

oarefylly oonriderod br thir 

requert 88 fOllW8~ 

roaelved and 

quote rra8 your 

oounty, sexw, 

8OtriOdl ~WW’ 

nwber of othe,. 

d rlvrr 8nd wed 

heoe tanIt however 

%U ~W8tiOll U'i888 '8ktr t& COlUltr bgtilr 

WQuire 8U4h~~~tfol'thO gUZ308* Of &WOr8ting 

818atrlo81 pwer, 8ad dlrtribute rush power to the 

oiti8eIlOhip Of thi8 @OPslt I, .rho.need it, for 8 tee, 

the reoelptr of vhioh rh4 1 bo aredltrd toward dafrrying th8 8rpaMe Of Oper8tiOn 8nd lnQldent&l8, 

860 
/ 

/ 

I ~ 

and the remslader oredited toward the iIaa1 paymoat 

of BeVenUe Bond8 i88wd for, that 911rpOue 

‘8uah qu48tIon I8 again related b4lor, togothor 

VItb 8U.4h other8 48 UI88 therefrom8 

'1. mv may A oouut or thir Itate, not a 

Woau-Rule' County, leg4 lf J raqulre a river 8lt4 

mid eri8ting dor, together with 8n 818otrIaal povsr 

&bMr&ilt6 8yrt8a 4olrp14t4* 

'2. HOW My 8U4h County Oprr8te auoh 8 COW 

plete l 14otrIa41 genrrating unit for th4 benrflt of 

it8 lnhabitultr VhO may mod the OUtpUt, or 4 p4rtion th4reof, of rwh eleatrI4al wwrg7 g&aerated? 

“3. In the eV8nt 84id OOUaty oey 14gally 40~ 

-quire ad Operate rU4h a 

8 

8nOrbting unit, mU8t 8U4h 

plant be opmted br the 08ml880~n4r~8 Court or by 

trU4t.488 appointed for t&t pWpO8.t 

‘4. That the tax burden and prerent Ladrbtrd- 

-48 18 ILOt i.nOCeMed, UT 8u4h bOqui8itIOA b8 Md4 

by the iSSU4 of Revenue gOnd8 aoaeptibl8 to th8 

l 011Or8 Of raid phlbtt 

*The \radrr8I@l.d tind8 BO 8 Oii14 l thOr ity 

In the prorent dt4tuter of thlr as. t4t4 authoris 

tbi8 ooulq to puraha88, own, pay for, and opera 9 e 

4n 4le4trloal pourr.generatlng plant for the benrflt 

of the inhabitant8 of the Comrty, regardlerr 4S the 

-43 of payment tht.rerar.g 

Xt I4 4 ~411 8ettlod prIn4ip14 oi 149 In thir 8tat.e 

that COBllE~44fOR4~8' OOU't8 4r4 aOlUt8 Of lilited jurI8dZatlQn 

and have only ruoh paver8 48 43% oontorrrd 4pOn th4m by th4 

OOll8titUtiOll and 8t4tUt48 Of thlr 8kter &34 th4 fOuOVitlg 

ruthorities : 

861 
. 862 

tonaablo Alvin 1. rap., page 3 '. 

8ua V&or tleotrlo 00. v, kwua, 30 8. U. 868. 

s&l1 Qouaty v* kyout I, sufrmaa, 264 8. II, so. 

. . . 

Bl ?a80 Oounty va m88, 106 8. V. (2d) 393. 

Eovard I. Hsndorron County, 116 8. Y. (Pd) 479. 

YoOllntook & Robortron v. Cottle County, 127 8. W. 

(26) 319. 

Ve have been unable to fled any authorit for.Ouadalupe Oounty to puroham, acquire OE operate the e % otrloal 

paver genoratlng plant de8aribd In your letter. 

III UI8VOF t0 YOUP fir8t qw8tiOn, it 18 OUF OpiniOII 

that Ouadalupe Ooimt~ i8 not legally authorlred to puraham or 

a o q ulro the l leotrioal generating ry8ter derorlbed in your 

lettm. 

H8V 

tlonr 2, 3 and 

8IlrWered thurly DO UUYIr %8 needed t0 9Il@8- 

Very truly your8 

ATTommY 0BlmAL 09 TBIM 

UJ?Idb 

APPaevEo

OPINION ooMYIlTcc c!

8 -r
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         287,941
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  659,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 12,649,691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,911,151
<PP&E>                                       4,651,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,400,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,539,079
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,958
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,006,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,400,650
<SALES>                                     24,595,789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,595,789
<CGS>                                       15,147,158
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,249,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,144,020
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,922,772)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   368,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,290,772)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,290,772)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.08)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31(c)
I, Wallace A. Patzke, Jr., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Florida Rock Industries,
Inc;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a.	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b.	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluations; and

c.	disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

a.	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information and

b.	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:  January 27, 2005
                                                WALLACE A. PATZKE, JR.
                                                WALLACE A. PATZKE, JR.
                                                Vice President, Controller
                                                and Chief Accounting Officer

1
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 142 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 142

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 31, 1993.
    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI for a two-thirds 
vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is 
presented to the House is waived with respect to a resolution reported on the 
legislative day of March 31, 1993, providing for consideration of a conference 
report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 64) setting forth 
the congressional budget for the United States Government for the fiscal years 
1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-13-2018]

On February 23, 2018, International Converter submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 138H, in Caldwell, Ohio.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (83 FR 8966-8967, March 2, 2018). On June 25, 2018, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: June 25, 2018.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-13915 Filed 6-27-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
261 La. 1058

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Alex ASH v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52477.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 23, 1972.

In re: Alex Ash applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Application denied; the ruling of the trial court on the evidentiary hearing is correct.