alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-KSB/A
 (Amendment No. 2)
 (Mark One)
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2007
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from       to
 Commission file number: 000-25548
 SUTURA, INC.
 (Name of small business issuer in its charter)
 DELAWARE
    
    84-1010269(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (I.R.S. Employerincorporation or organization)
    
    Identification No.)
 
 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
  (Issuers telephone number)
   o
 þ o
 o
 o þ
      o þ




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  PART IIITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURESPART IIISIGNATURESEX-31.1EX-31.2EX-32.1EX-32.2    Table of Contents




---



##### Table of Contents



Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




---



##### Table of Contents



Internal Control Integrated Framework
     
   31.1
    
    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Sutura, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2
    
    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Sutura, Inc. pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.1
    
    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Sutura, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.2
    
    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Sutura, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  SUTURA INCBy:
    
    /s/ BRIAN ABRAHAM

Brian Abraham, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorDate:
    
    March 24, 2009By:
    
    /s/ RICHARD BJORKMAN

Richard Bjorkman, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President Finance
and DirectorDate:
    
    March 24, 2009
  By:
    
    /s/ MARK STREFLING

Mark Strefling, Chairman of the Board, DirectorDate:
    
    March 24, 2009By:
    
    /s/ DAVID KERNAN

David Kernan, DirectorDate:
    
    March 24, 2009By:
    
    /s/ JOHN KOPCHIK

John Kopchik, DirectorDate:
    
    March 24, 2009
Exhibit 21




                                  Subsidiaries
                                of the Registrant


The following is a list of the Company's consolidated subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2003:

                                                                    Percent of
                                                  State or            Voting
                                                 Country of         Securities
                Subsidiary                      Organization           Owned
                ----------                      ------------        -----------

The Beard Company (1)                             Oklahoma          Registrant
Advanced Internet Technologies, L.L.C.            Oklahoma              71%
Beard Environmental Engineering, L.L.C.           Oklahoma             100%
Beard Leasing Company                             Delaware             100%
Beard Oil Company                                 Delaware             100%
Beard Sino-American Resources Co., Inc.           Oklahoma             100%
Beard Technologies, Inc.                          Oklahoma             100%
Beijing Beard Bio-Tech Engineering Co., Ltd.       China               100%
Incorporated Tank Systems (2)                     Delaware              49%
Incorporated Tank Systems de Mexico,
    S.A. de C.V.                                   Mexico              100%
Interstate Travel Facilities, Inc.                Oklahoma             100%
ISITOP, Inc.                                      Oklahoma              80%
ITS, Inc.                                         Oklahoma             100%
starpay, com, l.l.c.                              Oklahoma              71%


     (1)  The consolidated financial statements of the Company include accounts
          of Registrant and the subsidiaries controlled by the Registrant.

     (2)  Owns 100% of ITS, Inc. which in turn owns 100% of Incorporated Tank
          Systems de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

     (3)  Excludes 80%-owned Cibola Corporation. Registrant does not have
          operating or financial control of this subsidiary.

     (4)  Also excludes 50%-owned ITS-TESTCO, L.L.C. and TESTCO, INC. de MEXICO,
          S.A. de C.V. Registrant does not have operating and financial control
          of these subsidiaries.

     (5)  Excludes those subsidiaries treated as equity investments.

     (6)  Excludes subsidiaries which, considered in the aggregate as a single
          subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary as of the
          end of the year covered by this report.
#### Ivan HERTZENDORF, Petitioner, v. The Hon. Ellen J. MORPHONIOS, Judge of the Criminal Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-872.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 8, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed November 17, 2021

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D18

- 244 Lower Tribunal No. 14

- 8095

________________


### One West Bank, N.A. , Appellant,

vs. 

### Gloria Leek
- Tannenbaum, etc. , Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, J r. , Judge. Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, and D. Brian O'Dell (Birmi n g ham, AL) , for appellant. Jacobs Legal, PLLC, and Bruce Jacobs , for appellee.

Before EMAS, LOGUE and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.2 This appeal stems from a n action attempting to foreclos e on a reverse mortgage. After trial, the circuit court entered judgment in favor of the Appellee, the surviving spouse of the borrower, finding that although she did not sign the note, she also qualified as a “borrower” because of the circumstances surrounding her signing of the mortgage. A panel of this court initially agreed. OneWest Bank, N.A. v. Leek

- Tannenbaum , 283 So. 3d 366 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019). On review, however, the Florida Supreme Court quashed our prior
decision. OneWest Bank, N.A. v. Leek

- Tannenbaum , No. SC19

- 1928, 2021 WL 4946821, at *1 (Fla. Oct. 22, 2021)

. Upon remand, the Court directed us to reconsider this matter in light of WVMF Funding v. Palmero , 320 So. 3d 689 (Fla. 2021).
In Palmero , the Court rejected th e argument made by the Appellee

. The Supreme Court held:
Because the note

— which defines [the spouse who signed the note] and only [that spouse] as the “ Borrower ”

— resolves any conflict created by [ the surviving spouse] signing her name in the “Borrower” signature block of the mortgage, we need not look beyond (and it was unnecessary for the trial court to look beyond) the note and mortgage to the other documents that were part of the same transaction to determine, as a matter of law, how the parties intended to define the term “ Borrower. ” Palmero , 320 So. 3d at 693.3 Adhering to Palmero , we reverse the final judgment under review and remand with directions that the trial court enter a foreclosure judgment for the Appellant.
Reversed with directions

.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.97 N 77.02 W Meters AGL
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 22

- 2 32 5

_____________________________
M ARLON M OORE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. J. Lee Marsh , Judge

. November 22, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
O STERHAUS , C.J., and B.L. T HOMAS and N ORDBY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Marlon Moore , pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General
, and Zachary Lawton
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.
****
**FGDL Home**
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 29554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13493]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Number: PR18-58-000.
    Applicants: Enable Oklahoma Intrastate Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)+(g): EOIT Revised SOC 
July 2018 to be effective 7/13/2018.
    Filed Date: 6/13/18.
    Accession Number: 201806135084.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/5/18.
    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/13/18.

    Docket Number: PR18-59-000.
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Tejas Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b)(2)+(: Petition for 
Approval of Market-Based Rates to be effective 10/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 6/15/18.
    Accession Number: 201806155106.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/6/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-897-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Revise Interruptible Pro Forma 
Agreements to be effective 7/16/2018.
    Filed Date: 6/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180615-5018.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/27/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-898-000.
    Applicants: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Revise Rate Schedules to 
Provide Multiple Evergreen Option to be effective 7/16/2018.
    Filed Date: 6/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180615-5019.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/27/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: June 18, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-13493 Filed 6-22-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**EXHIBIT 10 (j)**

 

**THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE FRISCH’S**

**EXECUTIVE SAVINGS PLAN**

 

WHEREAS, Frisch’s Restaurants, Inc. (“Employer”) adopted the Frisch’s Executive Savings Plan (“Plan”) effective as of November 5, 1993; and 

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of Article VIII of the Plan, the Employer has the right to amend or terminate the Plan at anytime; and 

 

WHEREAS, the Employer previously amended the Plan toadopt a prototype plan sponsored by Fidelity Management Trust Company to govern all Participant-directed investments other than investments in common stock of the Employer; and 

 

WHEREAS, the Employer wishes to further amend the Plan to change the Plan Year and to make changes required by the InternalRevenue Code; 

 

NOW THEREFORE, effective as of January 1,2005, except as noted below, the Employer hereby modifies and amends the Plan as follows: 

 

1. Section 2.15 of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

 

“Plan Year means the calendar year.” 

 

2. Section 3.3 shall be amended effective March 15, 2005 pursuant to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code solely for the 2005 PlanYear to permit Participants to file elections to defer Compensation with the Committee on or before March 15, 2005 to apply to Compensation earned after March 15, 2005 but on or before December 31, 2005. 

 

3. In all other respects the Plan shall remain unchanged. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer, by its duly authorized officer, has causedthis Amendment to be executed this 7th day of June 2005.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ended April 24, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Dale R. Black, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



Date: June 16, 2011

/s/ DALE R. BLACK Dale R. Black Chief Financial Officer


1

---



QuickLinks
#### Nicola Brady, Appellant, v Paris Maintenance Company, Inc., Respondent.

[721 NYS2d 512]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered on or about December 7, 1999, which denied plaintiff’s motion to vacate the court’s October 13, 1998 order granting, on default, defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint reinstated on the condition that plaintiff provide all the remaining discovery within 45 days of this order.

Although plaintiff failed to explain her long delay in seeking to vacate her default, the substance of the parties’ depositions, along with the contents of the verified complaint, establish that plaintiff has a meritorious cause of action. Nor is there any challenge to counsel’s explanation for his default on the dismissal motion. Particularly in recognition of plaintiff’s cooperation with the discovery process in all other respects, and in the absence of any apparent prejudice to defendant, we conclude that plaintiff should be afforded an opportunity to proceed with this action, subject to the foregoing condition. Concur—Tom, J. P., Andrias, Ellerin, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ C ase No. 5D23- 0515 LT Case No. 2021

- CP

- 001940

_____________________________ L ANDON L. W ILLIAMS , J R ., A ppellant,

v. R EGINALD L. W ILLIAMS , S R ., I NDIVIDUALLY and as P ERSONAL R EPRESENTATIVE of the E STATE of L ANDON L. W ILLIAMS , S R ., a/k/a L andon L ovar W illiams Sr ., L ANITA W ILLIAMS -W ELLS , Y OLANDA S. W ILLIAMS , AND M ICHELLE D. W ILLIAMS , A ppellee s.

____________________________ _

On a ppeal from the Circuit Court f or Duval County

. Jack M

. S chemer , J udge

. Landon L

. W illiams, J r., J acksonville, p ro se
. No el G. L awrence, of

N o el G. L awrence, P .A., J acksonville, f or Appellee, Reginald L

. W illiams, S r
. No Appearance for R emaining A ppe l lees.
A pril 12, 202 42 H ARRIS , J.
A ppellant, Landon Williams , Jr ., appeals the trial court’s Final Order Denying Petition s to Invalidate Last Will and Testament of Landon Williams , Sr. Finding no error, we affirm that order in all respects.
A ppellant also challenges the court’s finding of entitlement to attorney’s fees in favor of Appellee, Reginald L. Williams, Sr

. The challenged order did not award any specific amount of fees, it merely reserved jurisdiction to do so

. An order finding entitlement to attorney’s fees without setting the amount is a non final, non

appealable order. Sitaram v. Alley , 325 So. 3d 919, 921 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020). We therefore dismiss this portion of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
F inally , Appellant challenges the trial court’s failure to remove the personal representative and failure to rule on his oral request for a mistrial. “ Appellate courts may not decide issues that were not ruled on by a trial court in the first instance. ” Sie r ra by Sier r a v. Pub. Health Tr. of Dad e Cnty

. , 661 So. 2d 1296, 1298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Because these final two issues are not ripe for appellate review, we dismiss those portions of the appeal as well.

A FFIRMED in part ; D ISMISSED in part

.

E DWARDS , C.J. , and K ILBANE , J., concur
.

___ __________________________ N ot final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY

FEDERAL VOTING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 4800 MARK CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 03J25-02

 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22350-4000

March 14, 2017

Michael Haas

Administrator

Wisconsin Elections Commission

212 East Washington Ave., 3rd Floor

Madison, WI 53707-7984

Dear Mr. Haas:

I am writing today regarding Wisconsin’s requirement that a witness signature and address from 

another United States citizen accompany a returned absentee ballot, including the Federal Write-In 

Absentee Ballot (FWAB), from military and overseas voters. As you are aware, the Federal Voting 

Assistance Program (FVAP) is the Department of Defense program charged with administering the 

federal responsibilities of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, or UOCAVA. Our 

mission is to help ensure Service members, their eligible family members and overseas citizens are aware 

of their right to vote and have the tools and resources to successfully do so. 

Based on recent research and voter feedback received during the 2016 election, we have concerns 

with Wisconsin’s requirement that UOCAVA voters returning their official absentee ballot or FWAB must

provide a witness signature and address from another U.S. citizen. It is important to recognize that 

UOCAVA voters, particularly those stationed or residing overseas, face complexities in the voting process 

that in-person or State absentee voters do not face. In 2016, FVAP completed research of known 

overseas civilian voters during the 2014 federal elections. Of these known overseas voters, nine percent

of those living in Europe, South Asia and the Western Hemisphere indicated they did not know any other 

U.S. citizens residing in the same country. Additionally, traveling to the nearest State Department 

Embassy or Consulate may require substantial time, energy and cost. Based on these findings, overseas 

citizens will face real challenges in finding a witness who meets the requirements specified under 

Wisconsin law. 

FVAP stands willing and ready to work with Wisconsin in finding possible solutions that would 

meet the intent of this requirement without placing a burden on a significant portion of the overseas 

citizen community. Please contact Nate Bacchus, FVAP State Affairs Specialist, at 

nate.a.bacchus@fvap.gov with any questions, concerns or comments you may have. 

Thanks for all you, your staff and colleagues in the Wisconsin Election Commission do to support 

and assist our military and overseas voters. 

Sincerely, 

David Beirne

Director
# Official Journal L 315/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 315 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 647 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 315

English edition

Legislation

Volume 647 September 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1455 of 6 September 2021 approving the low-risk active substance Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain AH2 in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1455 of 6 September 2021 approving the low-risk active substance Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain AH2 in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (
  1
  )

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Kinetics Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended November 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sandy B. Sewitch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Sandy B. SewitchSandy B. Sewitch Chief Financial Officer January 14, 2004




25