alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION of CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT to SECTION 1350 of CHAPTER 63 of TITLE 18 of the UNITED
STATES CODE,

as ADOPTED PURSUANT to

SECTION 906 of THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report
of Frischs Restaurants, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 4, 2008 (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Registrant certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |     |  |                        
|------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|              |  |    
|April 5, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Craig F. Maier     
|              |  |     |  | Craig F. Maier         
|              |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a  14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that
Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as other otherwise stated in such filing.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In
connection with the Annual Report of Hyperdynamics Corporation (Hyperdynamics),
on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Ray Leonard, Chief Executive Officer of
Hyperdynamics, does hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
September 28, 2010




By:
                  /s/ Ray LeonardRay
      LeonardChief
      Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED ELSEWHERE IN THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999
<CASH>                                           5,643
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,335
<INVENTORY>                                     82,366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,126
<PP&E>                                         332,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,654
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 532,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,774
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,260
<OTHER-SE>                                     212,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   532,399
<SALES>                                        387,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               387,134
<CGS>                                          219,663
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  329,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (521)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,621
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,172
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,826
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,346
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,346
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.33
        

</TABLE>
Union Calendar No. 109

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 821

[Report No. 103–197]

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend

of the Armed Forces.retired pay as members of a reserve componentsons who have 20 years of service creditable foreligibility for burial in national cemeteries to perJULY 29, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
IB

Union Calendar No. 109

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 821

[Report No. 103–197]

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility for burial in

national cemeteries to persons who have 20 years of service creditable

for retired pay as members of a reserve component of the Armed Forces.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. BONILLA (for himself and Mr. STENHOLM) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

JULY 29, 1993

Additional sponsors: Mr. TEJEDA, Mr. BUYER, Mr. DELAY, Mr. BURTON of

Indiana, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. SARPALIUS, Mr. UNDERWOOD, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mr. PENNY, Mr. BISHOP, Mr. KING, Mr. HEFNER, Mr. RICHARDSON, Mr. PAYNE of Virginia, and Mr. PARKER

JULY 29, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility

for burial in national cemeteries to persons who have

20 years of service creditable for retired pay as members

of a reserve component of the Armed Forces.
2

•HR 821 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR BURIAL IN NATIONAL CEME4 TERIES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2402 of title 38, United

6 States Code, is amended—

7 (1) by redesignating paragraph (6) as para8 graph (7); and

9 (2) by adding after paragraph (5) the following

10 new paragraph:

11 ‘‘(6) Any person who at the time of death was entitled

12 to retired pay under chapter 67 of title 10 or would have

13 been entitled to retired pay under that chapter but for

14 the fact that the person was under 60 years of age.’’.

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) Section

16 2301(e) of such title is amended by striking out ‘‘section

17 2402(6)’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘section 2402(7)’’.

18 (2) Section 2306(a)(2) of such title is amended by

19 striking out ‘‘(6)’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘(7)’’.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Kevin
      T. Dunphy, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Aduromed Industries, Inc.,
      (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the three month period ended
      March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
      or
      15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      May
      14, 2008





/s/
                Kevin T. DunphyKevin
                T. DunphyTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Rev 0 (9/08) 

## Com **ments i**  **n Response to “**  **Final r**  **ule; r**  **equest for c**  **om ments**  **”**
**Docket: FAA**  **- 20**  **12 -**  **0292 Directorate Identifier**  **2011 -**  **NM -**  **056 -** **AD** Comments have been received in response to : **“ Final rule; requ**  **est for comments,”** Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate I dentifier entered above. (Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted. Once you have made your determination, please fill in the com menter(s) name(s) and check the appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, if necessary. Then **include your name and**  **the date**  in the spaces provided, and return it to the AD directorate focal. The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we re ceived from: Alexander Lundeen
. **(Please check on**  **e**

**)** These comments **have not** been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration or change of this AD. These comments **have** been found to contain information that warrants consideration of additional regulatory

action. 

### (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual **FAA -**  **IR -**  **M -**  **8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)**

______Vladimir Ulyanov

_____ 5/17/2012

__ Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
#### Allton JOSEPH v. OWENS ILLINOIS CO., INC. and Aetna Casualty & Surety.

No. 61839.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Allton Joseph applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.
262 La. 304

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. David WINCHESTER v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 52577.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 20, 1972.

In re: David Winchester applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Application denied; the showing made does not warrant the exercise of our. original or supervisory jurisdiction.
Exhibit 99(a)


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with The Beard Company's (the "Company")  Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period  ended  March 31,  2003,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  William M. Beard,
Chairman  of the Board and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:    May 13, 2003               By: WILLIAM M. BEARD
                                        William M. Beard
                                        Chairman of the Board and
                                        Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Jeffrey L. Wright, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of G&K Services, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report.Date: May 5, 2006         By:  /s/ Jeffrey L. Wright    Jeffrey L. Wright    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 807 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 807

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals who are 
   exempt from the self-employment tax by reason of their religious 
                 beliefs to establish Keogh plans, etc.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1993

  Mr. Walker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals who are 
   exempt from the self-employment tax by reason of their religious 
                 beliefs to establish Keogh plans, etc.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF PENSION PLANS TO SELF-EMPLOYED INDIVIDUALS 
              WHO ARE EXEMPT FROM THE SELF-EMPLOYMENT TAX BY REASON OF 
              THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 401(c)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining earned income) is amended by 
adding at the end thereof the following new sentence: ``This 
subparagraph shall be applied as if the term trade or business for 
purposes of section 1402 included service described in section 
1402(c)(6).''
    (b) Technical Amendment.--Subsection (f) of section 219 of such 
Code is amended by striking the last sentence.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.

                                 <all>
```
;n\ '

Stuar t S . MacPherso n':''"• . P.O . Bo x 80 7 ''^

- ' ' iC ^ Cardiff , Calif . 9200 7 • , ' i /> , - ^ - '^ r . * » . - - ^ May5,201 0 ..l^v. ^ i .«.^^k ^ Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n\yu/sr M / ^ 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . A f/(iUJfC)0O U J ^ ^^^.663 5 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W100 0 WashtQgton , D.C . 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Dear Sir , 1 a mi nreceip t

o f afinal notic e o f

propose dcivi l penalt y for Cas e no . 2009WP910116 , date dApri l 30,2010 . I naccordanc e wit h1 4 C.F.R . 13.1 6 1 amsubmittin g thi s writte n reques t fo r ahearing . M y contac t

informatio nfoUows : Mailin g address : P.O . Bo x 80 7

Cardiff , Calif. 9200 7 Phon e Number : 760-632-662 4 Email : mac379m(a > gmail.co m

Cc : Laur aPonto , Attorne y
#### Edith BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-211.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 7, 1971.

C. Ray McDaniel, of Edmund, McDaniel and Garrard, Lake Alfred, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Warren H. Petersen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a judgment and sentence to 25 years in prison after a verdict of guilty of murder in the second degree. Appellant had been brought to trial on an indictment of first degree murder. Appellant’s motion for new trial was denied and she appeals on the sole ground that the court erred in not reducing its entire charge to the jury in writing as required by Section 918.10(2), F.S.A.

The court duly instructed the jury orally from prepared written instructions which included charges on first degree murder, murder in the second degree, murder in the third degree, manslaughter, justifiable homicide, excusable homicide and self defense. Extemporaneously he instructed the jury on the various verdicts they could return and on a recommendation of mercy. After the jury retired counsel for appellant objected to the oral charge and noted that the charge was outside the written instructions furnished to the jury.

In the oral charge in question the trial judge stated that:

> “When you retire to your jury room for my charges, there are concerned here, first, the charge which is made against her of murder in the first degree. As I told you, if you find her guilty of that charge, it must be by your unanimous vote. If you do so, then you can and you should consider whether or not you wish to recommend her to the mercy of the Court. That question, you will determine by a majority, that is, a majority of you may recommend that. If you find that she is not guilty of murder in the first degree, then you should consider whether or not she is guilty of the lesser included charge of murder in the second degree. If you find her not guilty of the crime of murder in the second degree, you should consider murder in the third degree. And if you find her not guilty of that charge, you should consider whether or not she is guilty of the crime of manslaughter. If you find that she is not guilty of any one of those, then, of course, your verdict is one of not guilty.”

*496It should also be noted that the court instructed the jury on a recommendation of mercy, which was included in the written instruction on probation and parole which read in' part:

> “The question of whether mercy should be recommended is to be determined by the jury in a fair and impartial manner * *

We are of the opinion that the oral charge excepted to by appellant is merely a clarification of the written charges which are clearly most adequate in that everything which was necessary in order to properly determine the guilt or innocence of appellant was included, thereby satisfying the requirements of Section 918.10(2), F.S.A.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
#### Malcolm Allen ROBERTSON v. CUMIS INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 61909.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Malcolm Allen Robertson, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Rapides. 355 So.2d 1371.

Writ denied. The result is correct.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 28671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13186]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-
Class Package Service Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: June 20, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
June 14, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, & First-Class 
Package Service Contract 39 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-180, CP2018-252.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-13186 Filed 6-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Maurice F. TASSIN v. SOUTH LOUISIANA PORT COMMISSION.

No. 53116.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1973.

In re: Maurice F. Tassin applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. John the Baptist. 270 So.2d 653.

Writ denied. The result is correct.
Record for the Proposed Section 316(b) Rule for Phase III Facilities

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

A B

Author: Abt Associates Inc.

Date Modified: 3/22/2011

Purpose: This file compiles PPI of Capital Goods for use in the capital expenditures estimate.

File Contents:

Worksheet Contents

Average Calc Calculates the average PPI value for a specified set of years

Data Original PPI data from the BLS

November 1, 2004 1 of 3 EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-1445.xls - File Info
Range Start 1999 Select first year of the period over which you want to average

Range End 2008 Select last year of the period over which you want to average

Average PPI Value 144.6
Record for the Proposed Section 316(b) Rule for Phase III Facilities

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

A B C D E F G H I

 Producer Price Index-Commodities Data extracted on: July 14, 2010 (10:09:46 AM)

Series Id: WPUSOP3210

Not Seasonally Adjusted

Group: Stage of processing

Item: Manufacturing industries

Base Date: 1982

Series Id Year Period Value

WPUSOP3210 1991 M13 127.8

WPUSOP3210 1992 M13 129.3

WPUSOP3210 1993 M13 131.2

WPUSOP3210 1994 M13 133.2

WPUSOP3210 1995 M13 135.8

WPUSOP3210 1996 M13 137.2

WPUSOP3210 1997 M13 137.7

WPUSOP3210 1998 M13 137.9

WPUSOP3210 1999 M13 138.5

WPUSOP3210 2000 M13 139.5

WPUSOP3210 2001 M13 140.4

WPUSOP3210 2002 M13 140.0

WPUSOP3210 2003 M13 139.9

WPUSOP3210 2004 M13 142.4

WPUSOP3210 2005 M13 146.0

WPUSOP3210 2006 M13 149.2

WPUSOP3210 2007 M13 152.5

WPUSOP3210 2008 M13 157.3

WPUSOP3210 2009 M13 159.2

November 1, 2004 3 of 3 EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-1445.xls - Data
----

**Exhibit        32**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                  Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                  of                  the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                  *John T. English*   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   | John                  T. English         |
|   | Chief                  Executive Officer |
|   | August                  13, 2007         |
|   |                                     |
|   |                                     |
|   | /s/                  *George M. Bachman* |
|   | George                  M. Bachman       |
|   | Chief                  Financial Officer |
|   | August                  13, 2007         |

----