alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 149

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

April 28, 1993.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 1578) to amend the Congressional Budget and

Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to provide for the expedited consideration of certain proposed rescissions of budget

authority. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed

with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall

not exceed two hours, with one hour to be equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Rules and one hour to be equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on Government Operations. After general

debate the bill shall be considered as read for amendment

under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as

an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the fiveminute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute
2

HRES 149 EH

printed in part 1 of the report of the Committee on Rules

accompanying this resolution. The amendment in the nature

of a substitute shall be considered as read. No amendment

to the amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in

order except those printed in part 2 of the report of the Committee on Rules. Each amendment may be offered only in the

order printed, may be offered only by the named proponent

or a designee, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable

for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment except as specified in the report, and shall

not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order

against the amendments printed in the report are waived. At

the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the

amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order as

original text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage
3

HRES 149 EH

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



       
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<CASH>                                          12,195
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    122,588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,429
<PP&E>                                         384,988
<DEPRECIATION>                                 180,957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,256
<BONDS>                                        192,482
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,752
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,847
<SALES>                                        385,178
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               387,761
<CGS>                                          280,982
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  280,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,475)         
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,475)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,475)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.59)
        

</TABLE>
2413-S Page 1 of 1

PROG# 2413-S.................................TERM: July 1, 2012 Thru June 30, 2013 (Option Years thru June 2017)

-------- ---------------------------------- ------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- 

District Gray WBC Inc. DBA 

Creative Graphics Lithexcel 

Upper Marlboro Capitol Heights Albuquerque 

Maryland Maryland New Mexico 

BASIS

ITEM OF

NUMBER ITEM DESCRIPTION AWARD UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST 

-------- ---------------------------------- ------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- 

I. COMPLETE PRODUCT: (a) Pocket folder printing in four-color

process, including construction

 (1) Makeready and/or Setup............... 6 2,140.00 12,840.00 850.00 5,100.00 680.00 4,080.0 (2) Running Per 1000 Copies............... 40.5 315.50 12,777.75 534.00 21,627.00 398.00 16,119.0II. ADDITIONAL OPERATIONS: (a) Revised digital CONTENT Proofs ... per trim/page-size unit................. 2 68.00 136.00 40.00 80.00 5.00 10.0 (b) Revised digital color

CONTRACT Proofs.......................

 per trim/page-size unit................. 2 175.00 350.00 120.00 240.00 20.00 40.0

-------- ---------------------------------- ------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- 

TOTAL $26,103.75 $27,047.00 $20,249.0

DISCOUNT 2.00% $522.08 1.00% $270.47 1.00% $202.4

NET TOTAL $25,581.67 $26,776.53 $20,046.5
# The Attorney General of Texas
December 23, 1982 MARK WHITE Attorney General
Supreme Court Building P. 0. Box 12548 Austin. TX. 78711. 2548 5121475-2501 Telex 9101874-1367 Telecopier 5121475-0266
1607 Main St., Suite 1400 Dallas, TX. 75201.4709 2141742.8944
4824 Alberta Ave., Suite 160 El Paso, TX. 79905.2793 9151533.3484
1220 Dallas Ave.. Suite 202 Houston. TX. 77002-6986 7131650-0666
806 Broadway, Suite 312 Lubbock, TX. 79401.3479 8061747-5238
4309 N. Tenth, Suite B McAllen. TX. 78501.1685 5121682.4547
200 Main Plaza, Suite 400 San Antonio. TX. 78205.2797 512/225-4191
An Equal Opportunity/ Affirmative Action Employer HonorableHamp Atkinson, Chairman House Public EducationCommittee Texas House of Representatives P. 0. Box 2910 Austin, Texas 78769 OpinionNo. m-531 Re: Whether school board of trusteesmay organize at times other than that provided in section 23.19 of the Education Code Dear RepresentativeAtkinson: You have asked whether an independent school district board of trusteesmay organizeat any time other than that specified in section 23.19 of the Texas Education Code. Section 23.19 provides in pertinentpart:

(d) At the first meeting after each election and qualification of trustees, the members shall organize by selecting [a board president, secretary,treasurer,an assessor and collectorof taxes, and] such other officers and committeesas theboardmay deem necessary. Independent school districtsmay conduct an election for school trustees on one of the four dates specified in article 2.01b of the Texas Election Code. Under section 23.19 of the Education Code, the trustees "shall organize"at the firstmeeting followingeach election and the qualification of trustees. This section neither states nor implies, however, that the trustees may not organize at any other time, and in our opinion such a prohibition should not be read into it. Theremay be times during the school year in which the board may need to reorganize-- for example,when one or more of the officers of the board resigns and new officers must be chosen -- and we do not believe the legislature intended that such a reorganizationwould not then be authorized. We therefore answer your question in the affirmative. SUMMARY

An independent school district board of trusteesmay organize at some time other than that

p. 1921HonorableHamp Atkinson - Page 2 (MN-531)

specified in section 23.19 of the Texas Education Code. ati

Attorney General of Texas JOHNW. FAINTER, JR. First AssistantAttorney General RICHARD E. GRAY III ExecutiveAssistantAttorney General Preparedby Jon Bible AssistantAttorneyGeneral APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE SusanL. Garrison,Chairman Jon Bible Rick Gilpin PatriciaHinojosa Jim Moellinger

p. 1922
255 La. 337

#### MARYLAND NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Honorable Jim GARRISON, District Attorney in and for the Parish of Orleans.

No. 50375.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 13, 1970.

In re: Maryland National Insurance Company applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ refused. There is no error of law in the ruling complained of.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 0908 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 -NM - 251 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
<Page>





                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-1A of
our report dated June 30, 2000, relating to the financial statement and
financial highlights of Morgan Stanley International SmallCap Fund, formerly
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter International SmallCap Fund, referred to in such
report, which appears in such Registration Statement.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
July 26, 2001
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-784V

UNPUBLISHED

SARAH HOLBROOK-LIPSCOMB on 

behalf of her minor child, M.L.,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: October 19, 2021

Withdrawal of petition; Order 

concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On January 22, 2021, Sarah Holbrook-Lipscomb filed a petition for compensation

on behalf of her minor child, M.L., under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation 

Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 34.

2 Petitioner alleged that M.L. suffered 

injuries after receiving a human papillomavirus vaccination on January 23, 2018. ECF 

no. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine 

Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “that the petitioner may withdraw the petition 

under section 300aa—21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section 

300aa—21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master.” 42 

U.S.C. § 300aa—12(g). On October 19, 2021, Petitioner timely filed a notice to withdraw 

the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—21(b). 

In light of Petitioner’s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa—21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner’s request to withdraw the

petition is GRANTED. Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that 

proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment 

“on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United 

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal 

Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available 

to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, 

I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
#### Julius C. McDONALD, Sr., Appellant, v. Velma Cannon McDONALD, Appellee.

No. 73-260.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 26, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Milton Edward FRETWELL, Jr., Appellant, v. Louis L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-804.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 27, 1972.

F. Hartselle Baker, of Robertson & Williams, Orlando, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is a delayed appeal by habeas corpus. We have carefully reviewed the record, the excellent brief presented on behalf of the appellant, and carefully considered all points therein contained. On the basis thereof it is our view that no harmful error has been demonstrated. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-00848, No. 333-76851, No. 333-79337, No. 333-82257, No. 333-38860, No. 333-66068, No. 333-105620, No. 333-120708 and No. 333-133003) of PC Mall, Inc. (formerly
IdeaMall, Inc. and Creative Computers, Inc.) of our report dated March 2, 2007 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|Los Angeles, California       
|March 12, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.3





SHARED SERVICES AGREEMENT

Bruker SA ("Provider") and Bruker AXS SA ("User") are parties to a Sharing
Agreement dated September 26, 2000 (the "Sharing Agreement"). As part of and
to implement the Sharing Agreement, the parties agree as follows:

1.    Provider shall provide User G&A support, in the form of accounting,
human resources and related assistance. User shall pay Provider cost plus 5%
for such support.

2.    Provider shall provide User 145 square meters of space (externals
included) in Wissembourg and 165 square meters of space in Lisses. User shall
pay Provider 30.5E per square meter in Wissembourg and 75E per square meter
in Lisses for such space per year (plus charges).

3.    Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement shall be subject to
and governed by the Sharing Agreement.

Executed as of the date first written above.

BRUKER SA                                 BRUKER AXS SA

By: Christian Brevard                     By: Martin Haase
    --------------------------                --------------------------
Title: President and Director             Title: Director
      -----------------------                   ------------------------

/s/ C. Brevard                            /s/ M. Haase

      34, rue de l'Industrie                  34, rue de l'Industrie
      67166 WISSEMBOURG CEDEX                 67166 WISSEMBOURG CEDEX
      Tel (33) 03 88 736800                   Tel (33) 03 88 736800
      Fax (33) 03 88 736879                   Fax (33) 03 88 736879
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 7/29/15 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013

-0602 **SUBJECT:** Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with R4 State Agencies (moderated by the Duke Nicholas Institute)

**SUMMARY :**  

### Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan with Region 4 State Agencies (moderated by the Duke Nicholas Institute) 

### in Atlanta, GA, on May 22, 2015

. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES: EPA**  See attached list **External Stakeholders** Tim Profeta/Duke Nicholas Institute David Hoppock/Duke Nicholas Institute See attached list **ATTACHMENT s** **First Name Last Name**  **Title Organization**  Albert Pearce Environmental Engineer Environmental Protection Division Beverly Banister Director, R4 Air Division U.S. EPA Region 4 APTMD Brian Murray Director, Economic Analysis Nicholas Institute Carol Kemker Deputy Director, R4 Air Division U.S. EPA R4 APTMD Chad LaFontaine Environmental Engineer MDEQ Christopher Garbacz Director, Economics MPUS Chuck Mueller Assistant Branch Chief Georgia EPD Dale Hurst Environmental Manager Alabama Department of Environmental Management David Hoppock Senior Policy Associate Nicholas Institute Dika Kuoh NOx/Combustion Permitting Manager Georgia Environmental Protection Division Doug Carr Chief of the Energy Branch Alabama Department of Environmental Management Eddy Moore Managing Attorney Arkansas Public Service Commission Elisabeth Munsey Unit Manager EPD, Air Branch Gene Soult Senior Research Analyst SC Office of Regulatory Staff James Boylan Manager, Planning & Support Program Georgia EPD James Johnston Deputy Director Department of Environment & Conservation Jamie Barber EERE MANAGER GA Public Service Commission John Hornback Executive Director Metro 4/SESARM John Lyons Assistant Secretary for Climate Policy Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet Joseph Goffman Associate Assistant Administrator & Senior Counsel U.S. EPA Juan Santiago OAQPS U.S. EPA Julie DeMeester Policy Analyst Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions Justin Green Director Division of Air Resource Management, DEP Karen Hays Policy and Radiation Program Manager Georgia Environmental Protection Division Keith Bentley Air Branch Chief Georgia EPD Ken Mitchell Special Assistant to the Director U.S. EPA R4 APTMD Maeve Mason Program Manager SCDHEC Michael Monroe Environmental Health Manager III SCDHEC Michael Dowd Director, Air Division Va DEQ Myra Reece Bureau Chief SC DHEC Nicholas Cooper Utilities Engineer Georgia Public Service Commission Rob Trokey Utilities Analyst GA PSC Sheree Kernizan Director, Electric Unit GA PSC Talina Mathews Director, Energy Generation, Transmission and Distribution KY Dept of Energy Dev and IndependenceTaruna Vanjani Environmental Engineer GADNR Tim Profeta Director Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions William "Fred" Durham Director WVDEP

- Division of Air Quality
lnventoryExpertService 

A division of the American Chemical Sociely Phone: BOD-6S1·1884, 614-447-3870 

Fax: 614--447-<3747 

E-mail: answers@cas.org 

Web: www.cas.oJ9'products/other-cas-productslclient-services/ 

INVENTORYEXPERTSER~CEREPORT 

IES Order Number: 350862-1 

Registry Number: 73361-29-2 

CA Index Name: 

O:xirane., 2-methyl-, polymer with oxirane., monohe:xadecyl ether, phosphate 

CAS 

Please print the above CA lndeJC Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. 

If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. 

Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA. 

2540 blentanav River Road P.O. Box 3343 Columbus. OH 4.~210-0:1:-\4 liSA
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Howard S. Modlin,
      Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, and I, William
      G.
      Henry, Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer,
      each of General DataComm Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), do each hereby
      certify, to the best of my knowledge that:





(1)
      The
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007
      being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification accompanies this Form 10-QSB as an exhibit, but shall not be
      deemed as having been filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or
      the
      certifying officer.




Date:
              August 15, 2007
            
            /s/
                Howard S. ModlinHoward
                S. Modlin,
              Chairman
                of the Board, President and
              Chief
                Executive Officer




/s/
                William G. HenryWilliam
                G. Henry
              Vice
                President, Finance and Administration
              and
                Chief Financial Officer