alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS OF GARAN,
INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES ANNEXED HERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE

TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000039917
<NAME> GARAN, INCORPORATED
       
<S>                             <C>                    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996 
<CASH>                                      12,624,000 
<SECURITIES>                                 8,953,000 
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,473,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   511,000 
<INVENTORY>                                 32,886,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            74,768,000
<PP&E>                                      33,443,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,112,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             114,600,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,264,000
<BONDS>                                      2,913,000
<COMMON>                                     2,535,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  93,015,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               114,600,000
<SALES>                                     30,993,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,993,000
<CGS>                                       23,911,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,911,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,376,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   939,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,437,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











I, Frederick Pevow, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), certify that this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained herein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gateway Energy Corporation and its subsidiaries for the periods presented.








Date:  August 16, 2010                                                                                                                                 /s/  Frederick M. Pevow


Frederick M. Pevow


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
WASATCH PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
 714 East 7200 South, Midvale, Utah 84047 Phone 801-566-9688 - Fax 801-566-9680



May 5, 1997



W.A. Guy
305 N.W. 7th Ave.
Mineral Wells, TX  76067

Dear W.A;

The Board of  Directors  has  directed me to cancel all  certificates  issued in
behalf of  Lindbergh-Hammar  for  failure to  perform  per our  agreement.  It's
important that you understand that this has been done.

Our every  ho-e was that you would be  successful,  as it meant  success  for us
also. If sometime in the future you can secure the necessary funding and license
to establish  you business in the  insurance  industry  please let me know and I
will be more than happy to approach the board of Directors in your behalf.

Best Wishes,

/s/ Gary V. Heesch

Gary V. Heesch,
President


                                       14
MARQUIS A. CORBITT,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-1436

Opinion filed May 3, 2017.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original 

Jurisdiction.

Marquis A. Corbitt, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the 

merits.

WETHERELL, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
# C_2018427EN.01009302.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/93 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/93

---

Action brought on 25 September 2018 — Shore Capital International v EUIPO — Circle Imperium (The Inner Circle)

(Case T-575/18)

(2018/C 427/123)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Shore Capital International Ltd (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and N. Willich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Circle Imperium BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark The Inner Circle — International registration designating the European Union No 1 266 666

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 June 2018 in Case R 1402/2017-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision, insofar as it dismisses the appeal of the applicant against the decision of the defendant's Opposition Division dated 26 April 2017, and thus upholds the IR holder's application for protection of the international trademark ‘The Inner Circle’ (No. 1 266 666) in the European Union for class 41; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision, insofar as it dismisses the appeal of the applicant against the decision of the defendant's Opposition Division dated 26 April 2017, and thus upholds the IR holder's application for protection of the international trademark ‘The Inner Circle’ (No. 1 266 666) in the European Union for class 41;

| — | order the IR holder and the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings including the costs necessarily incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the IR holder and the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings including the costs necessarily incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                             800,200
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,124,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                       208,000
<INVENTORY>                                        953,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,140,500
<PP&E>                                           4,828,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,424,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,099,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,290,400
<BONDS>                                          9,650,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,811,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      (7,909,600)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,099,100
<SALES>                                          4,763,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,763,000
<CGS>                                            3,526,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,526,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,104,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 186,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (55,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (55,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (55,300)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### John Marshall REED et al. v. Lee R. THOMAS, Jr., et al.

No. 61928.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: John Marshall Reed, et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Bienville. 355 So.2d 277.

Denied.
257 La. 171

#### FRIENDLY FINANCE SERVICE MID CITY, INC. v. Julian E. WINDHAM et ux.

No. 50980.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1970.

In re: Friendly Finance Service Mid City, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ *531of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Ouachita. 240 So.2d 26.

Writ denied. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is correct. See CHF Finance Co. v. Jochum, 241 La. 155, 127 So.2d 534 (1961).
# Official Journal L 142/6 Ju

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 142 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 486 June 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 142

English edition

Legislation

Volume 486 June 2005

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Commission Decision of 15 October 2003 on ad hoc measures implemented by Portugal for RTP
  (notified under document number C(2003) 3526)

   (1) | 1 |
| | * | Commission decision of 22 September 2004 on the State aid which the United Kingdom is planning to implement for British Energy plc
  (notified under document number C(2004)3474)

   (1) | 26 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Commission

*

Commission Decision of 15 October 2003 on ad hoc measures implemented by Portugal for RTP
  (notified under document number C(2003) 3526)

   (1)

(notified under document number C(2003) 3526)

1

*

Commission decision of 22 September 2004 on the State aid which the United Kingdom is planning to implement for British Energy plc
  (notified under document number C(2004)3474)

   (1)

(notified under document number C(2004)3474)

26

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Private Calendar No. 11

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 810

[Report No. 103–603]

A BILL

For the relief of Elizabeth M. Hill.

JULY 14, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
V

Private Calendar No. 11

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 810

[Report No. 103–603]

For the relief of Elizabeth M. Hill.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1993

Mr. STENHOLM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JULY 14, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed

A BILL

For the relief of Elizabeth M. Hill.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED

4 STATES.

5 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any

6 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to

7 Elizabeth M. Hill—

8 (1) the sum of $6,780, and
2

•HR 810 RH

1 (2) interest on such sum—

2 (A) calculated at the rate determined in

3 the manner provided in subsections (a) and (b)

4 of section 1961 of title 28, United States Code,

5 and

6 (B) payable for the period beginning on

7 October 5, 1985, and ending on the date on

8 which such sum is paid.

9 Such sum represents the amount that was recovered by

10 the United States under Public Law 87–693 (76 Stat.

11 593; 42 U.S.C. 2651 et seq.) in satisfaction of its claim

12 against a tortiously liable third person for the value of

13 medical care and treatment the United States furnished

14 to Elizabeth M. Hill, but would have been recovered by

15 Elizabeth M. Hill if a timely request for a waiver of such

16 claim had been submitted on her behalf.

17 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY’S AND AGENT’S FEES.

18 Not more than 10 percent of the sums appropriated

19 by section 1 shall be paid to or received by any agent or

20 attorney for services rendered in connection with the claim

21 described in such section. Any person who violates this

22 section shall be fined not more than $1,000.
#### Larry Ronald GAYLE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42268.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 13, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 258 So.2d 457.

ROBERTS, C. J., ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
255 La. 341

#### Michael OSBORNE v. PHILLIPS BROTHERS et al.

No. 50391.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 23, 1970.

In re: Phillips Brothers applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. Charles. 230 So.2d 269.

Not considered.

Not timely filed. See La.Const. Art. 7, Sec. 11.
261 La. 1046

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. John WYERS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52457.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 1972.

In re: John Wyers applying for writ of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
Exhibit 3.7

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT    RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION  OF  METROMEDIA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.

It
is hereby certified that:

1.    The
name of the corporation (hereinafter the "Corporation") is



2.    The
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as previously amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the first paragraph of Article Fourth thereof and by substituting in its place
and stead the following new Article:

"FOURTH:
The total number of shares of stock that the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 470,000,000, divided as follows: 70,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, the par value of which is
$1.00 per share (the "Preferred Stock") and 400,000,000 shares of Common Stock, the par value of which is $0.01 per share (the "Common Stock)."

3.    The
amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation herein certified has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242(a) of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware. The amendment has been authorized by directors approval and vote at a meeting of the stockholders entitled to vote.

|Signed on November 5, 2003                    |  | 
|--------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/NATASHA ALEXEEVANatasha Alexeeva Secretary |  | 

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Donald P. Lofe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of The PMI Group, Inc. (Company), hereby certify that
the Annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                      
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 14, 2006 |  | /S/    DONALD P. LOFE,
JR.Donald P. Lofe, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
# Official Journal L 259/4 Oc

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 259 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 504 October 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 259

English edition

Legislation

Volume 504 October 2007

---

| Contents | | IV   Other acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA |
| | | EFTA Surveillance Authority |
| | * | EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 228/05/COL of 21 September 2005 issuing a Notice entitled ‘Guidelines on the application of Article 53 of the EEA Agreement to technology transfer agreements’ | 1 |

Contents

IV   Other acts

page

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EFTA Surveillance Authority

*

EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 228/05/COL of 21 September 2005 issuing a Notice entitled ‘Guidelines on the application of Article 53 of the EEA Agreement to technology transfer agreements’

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
### Schlemmer , Kevi n (OST )

From : Denni s Berry[dberry@esu15.org ] Sent : Tuesday , Apri l 27 , 201 0 5:5 2 P M To : Schlemmer , Kevi n (OST ) Subject : EA S Th e McCoo k

Cit yCounci l firs t vote d t o accep t th e SeaPortproposal . Thatfaile d o n a 3- 2 vote . Ou rAirportAdvisory , b ya on e vote margin , ha d recommende d SeaPort . Th e counci l the n vote d 5- 0 t o accep tGrea tLakes . W e d o remai n very concerne d tha t G Lha s n o marketin g i n th e are a an d ou renplanement s ar e weak . G Lseem s t o charg e rate s tha tdriv e passenger s away . The yals o fl ypas t i\/IcCoo k fairl yofte n withou tstopping . Th e servic e i s spott ya tbest . The ybasicall y d o no t respon d t o concern s ofpassenger s o rth e city . Clearl yth e user s ofth e servic e woul d lik e t o se e improvement s mad e i n a reliabl e schedule , cos t ofth e flight s an d genera l service . Th e bumping policyha s als o draw n complaints . Therefore , althoug h th e cit yofMcCook , Nebrask a vote d t o approv e Grea tLakes , MAJO R concern s exist . Denni s Berry , Mayo r

C 3
# Memorandum

**Date: To:**  Balaji Vaid ya nathan , Permit Section Manager **F rom:**  Eric Massey , Air Quality Division Director **Subject:** Proposed Final Permits to be Treated as Appealable Agency Actions The 2012 amendments to our permit rules, which were adopted in order to meet federal new source review requirements, provide that an applicant for a Class I permit or Class Ipermit revision may

begin actual construction, but not operation, on rec eipt of a “proposed final permit.” R18 - 2 - 302(G); R18 - 2 - 334(B) , R18 - 2 - 402(C) . A proposed final permit is “the version of a Class Ipermit or Class I permit revision that the Department proposes to issue and forwards to the Administrator for review,” as requ ired by § 502 of Title V of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7661d . In effect, under the revised rules, a proposed final permit is treated as a final authorization to construct. The purpose of this treatment is to ensure that Arizona’s unitary permit progra m does not place restrictions on Arizona industries that they would not face in jurisdictions with binary programs. Under a binary program, separate permits are issued to construct and operate, and onl y permit s to operate are subject to EPA review under Ti tle V. Thus a source in a jurisdiction with a binary program ordinarily

would have the authority to proceed with construction under a construction permit before EPA review of the Title V p ermit or permit revision occurred. Under Arizona administrative law , an “appealable agency action” is defined as “an action that determines the legal rights, duties or privileges of a part y.” Because a proposed final permit or permit revision under the revised rules determines the applicant’s right to construct, it must b e treated as an appealable agency action separate from the issuance of the final permit or permit revision . 1 We must therefore issue a notice of appealable agency action for both the proposed final permit or permit revision , as well as the final permit or permit revision . Please distribute this memorandum to all of y our permit engineers so that they are aware of this obligation . In addition, make sure that the subject matter of this memorandum is covered in an y training for permit engineers hired in the future.

1 Duplicative appeals can be avoided by consolidating appeals of proposed final permit and final permits, should they occ ur.
V

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 706

For the relief of Charles R. Laurie.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 1993

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Charles R. Laurie.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Charles R. Laurie, of Cleveland, Ohio, shall be

4 deemed to have retired under section 377(a) of title 28,

5 United States Code, on the date on which he completes

6 2 years of recall service as a magistrate judge under sec7 tion 636(h) of title 28, United States Code.

Æ