alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bing Xiao, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chang-On
      International, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2014 (the "Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Chang-On International, Inc.                                                                 



|                    | /s/
      Bing Xiao                                                
|------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 20, 2014 | Bing Xiao                                                          
|                    | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
      Financial Officer  
|                    | and Director                                                       
|                    | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer and
|                    | Principal Accounting Officer)                                      
|                    | Chang-On International, Inc.                                       



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chang-On
International, Inc. and will be retained by Chang-On International, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 130 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 130

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 17, 1993.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1335) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 1993, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration of the bill 
for failure to comply with clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI or clause 7 of rule XXI are 
waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the Committee of the 
Whole shall rise without motion. No further consideration of the bill shall be 
in order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
1

Ginnie Mae Sponsored Small Business Outreach Event 2021

Ginnie Mae sponsored a Small Business outreach recently. Please click on 

the link above to access this event. 

Thank you. 

Ginnie Mae
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Boy Elijah O’STEEN, Appellee.

No. M-92.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 13, 1970.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and J. Christian Meffert, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

A. C. Soud, Jr., Jacksonville, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

This court having consolidated for appeal this case and 14 others wherein the same defendant was charged with 15 separate offenses arising out of one search and seizure and one arrest, and the same principles of law being applicable, the order appealed from in this case is reversed pursuant to our decision in State of Florida v. O’Steen, 238 So.2d 434, opinion filed this date.

Reversed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
#### Steve Edward HOSHAW, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1259.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 20, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Steven R. Jacob, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the defendant below from an order revoking probation and the sentence then imposed. The previous conviction, upon which adjudication of guilt had been withheld and probation granted, was for unlawful carnal intercourse with an unmarried female minor of previous chaste character.

Upon revoking probation the court adjudicated the defendant guilty of the above mentioned crime and sentenced him to imprisonment in the State Penitentiary for a term of 15 years, with credit for certain jail time served. The sentence then made the following provision:

> “It Is Further Ordered that at the completion of said sentence you be evaluated by the Division of Mental Health for determination as a Mentally Disordered Sex Offender, pursuant to Section 917 of the Florida Statutes.

> “It Is Further Ordered that you shall not be released until it is determined that you are able to remain in Society without causing harm.”

Chapter 917, Florida Statutes (1975) for determination of whether a person is a Mentally Disordered Sex Offender provides for procedure thereunder to be taken prior to sentencing, upon deferring sentence. It was error to provide for it to occur after expiration of a sentence of imprisonment which was imposed. Section 917.14, Florida Statutes (1975) provides:

> “(1) If a defendant has been convicted of or has pleaded guilty or no contest to an offense or attempted offense in a current prosecution, the court may defer sentencing and certify him for a hearing and examination in the circuit court to determine whether he is a mentally disordered sex offender.

> “(2) The court may certify a defendant under subsection (1) on its own motion, on motion by the State Attorney or the defendant, or on application by affidavit of the defendant.’-’

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, but the sentence is vacated and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court to either *921resentence the defendant or defer sentence and certify the defendant for hearing under the said mentally disordered sex offender act.

It is so ordered.
#### Darla Jeanne GARBER, Appellant, v. SAXON BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC., Appellee.

No. 76-1610.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued Jan. 13, 1977.

Decided Feb. 14, 1977.

Elaine C. Major, Arlington, Va., for appellant.

Hill B. Wellford, Jr., Richmond, Va. (Francis V. Lowden, Jr., Christine H. Per-due, Hunton & Williams, Richmond, Va., on brief), for appellee.

Before WINTER, CRAVEN and BUTZ-NER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The district court, without granting leave to amend, dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint in which she alleged that she had been discharged for rebuffing the sexual advances of her male supervisor, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, on the ground that the complaint failed to allege a good cause of action. We disagree. We think that the complaint and its exhibits, liberally construed, allege an employer policy or acquiescence in a practice of compelling female employees to submit to the sexual advances of their male supervisors in violation of Title VII. The judgment of dismissal must be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.

*REVERSED AND REMANDED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         4188
<SECURITIES>                                  22812
<RECEIVABLES>                                 13629
<ALLOWANCES>                                    190
<INVENTORY>                                   11067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              52968
<PP&E>                                        25485
<DEPRECIATION>                                16380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                76235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         13356
<BONDS>                                        1500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                       6006
<OTHER-SE>                                    51482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  54788
<SALES>                                        7301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7696
<CGS>                                          4820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1448
<INCOME-TAX>                                     50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1398
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1398
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.27
        


</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Lobar, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912QR-11-C-0062 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59178 

R. Dale Holmes, Esq. 

Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & 

Furman PC 

Philadelphia, PA 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Travis D. Van Ort, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorney 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The parties have settled this appeal as a result of Board-assisted mediation. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, with prejudice. 

Dated: 23 June 2015 

..... 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59178, Appeal of Lobar, Inc., 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### Gussie BROWN and Betty Jean Young v. John W. BURWELL et al.

No. 45620.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 26, 1970.

Snow, Covington, Temple & Watts, Meridian, for appellants.

Ethridge, Bourdeaux & Jones, Corey & Corey, Meridian, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Official Journal L 253/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.253.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 253 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5429 September 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.253.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 253

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5429 September 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) No 964/2011 of 26 September 2011 laying down the weightings applicable from 1 July 2010 to the remuneration of officials, temporary staff and contract staff of the European Union serving in third countries | 1 |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) No 965/2011 of 28 September 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya | 8 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 966/2011 of 28 September 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 12 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 967/2011 of 28 September 2011 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EU) No 867/2010 for the 2010/11 marketing year | 14 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) No 964/2011 of 26 September 2011 laying down the weightings applicable from 1 July 2010 to the remuneration of officials, temporary staff and contract staff of the European Union serving in third countries

1

*

Council Regulation (EU) No 965/2011 of 28 September 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

8

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 966/2011 of 28 September 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

12

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 967/2011 of 28 September 2011 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EU) No 867/2010 for the 2010/11 marketing year

14

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Hyperdynamics Corporation (Hyperdynamics),
on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Kent P. Watts, Chief Executive Officer of
Hyperdynamics, does hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to his knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
April 17, 2008
 
 By:
              /s/
      Kent P. WattsKent
      P. WattsChief
      Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50614 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ-ZAVALA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-289-ALL Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing theJudgment in a Criminal Case, Armando Rodriguez-Zavala raises arguments that are foreclosed by Al mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), whic h held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 5, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 13, 2016

jam

Order 

Clerk

October 13, 2016

154407

EUGENE MCKINNEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 154407

 COA: 332893

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Montcalm CC: 2016-021040-AH

and CARSON CITY CORRECTIONAL 

FACILITY WARDEN,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

partial filing fee as required by the order of September 15, 2016, the Clerk of the Court is 

hereby directed to close the file.
No. 236.

#### George E. Bowling et al. *v.*Frank Beaver et al.

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma.

Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 5, 1925.

Decided October 12, 1925.

*Per Curiam.*

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; *Jett Bros. Distilling Co.*v. *Carrollton, 252*U. S. 1, 5, 6. *Mr. Dick Rice*for defendants in error, in support of the *528motion.

Messrs. *Vern E. Thompson*and *Halbert H.*Mc-*Cluer*for plaintiffs in error, in- opposition thereto.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-30227

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RENÉ ORTLIEB, III,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

(99-CR-31-ALL)

_________________________________________________________________

April 12, 1999

Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

René Ortlieb, III, appeals the district court’s pretrial

detention order, which, inter alia, overruled the magistrate

judge’s order setting bail at $200,000. Among other things,

Ortlieb contends that the Government failed to prove both that he

is a flight risk and that “no condition or combination of

conditions will reasonably assure ... the safety of [other

persons]” if he is not detained prior to his trial. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3142(e). (The Government’s application for leave to file a reply

memorandum in excess of 20 pages and the parties’ motions to

supplement the record are GRANTED.)
- 2 -

The record supports the district court’s determination that

the Government proved by a preponderance of the evidence that

Ortlieb is a flight risk; and, inferentially, that there is no

condition, or combination of conditions, which would reasonably

assure his appearance at trial. (Accordingly, we need not address

whether the district court erred by finding that Ortlieb would be

a threat to others’ safety if released prior to trial, or whether

the district court applied the correct standard of proof. See

United States v. Hare, 873 F.2d 796, 799 (5th Cir. 1989).)

AFFIRMED
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Lobar, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. W912QR-11-C-0062 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59178

R. Dale Holmes, Esq.

Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall &

Furman PC Philadelphia, PA Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Travis D. Van Ort, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville ORDER OF DISMISSAL The parties have settled this appeal as a result ofBoard-assisted mediation. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, with prejudice. Dated: 23 June 2015



## ..... Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA No. 59178, Appeal ofLobar, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
#### Ex parte Jerry EVERHART.

77-459.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 26, 1978.

SHORES, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 30927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR18-60-000.
    Applicants: The Narragansett Electric Company.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e): Revised Statement of 
Operating Conditions to be effective 8/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 6/18/18.
    Accession Number: 201806185107.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/9/18.

    Docket Numbers: PR18-61-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: COH Rates effective 
5-31-2018.
    Filed Date: 6/21/18.
    Accession Number: 201806215079.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/18.

    Docket Numbers: PR18-59-001.
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Tejas Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b)(2): Errata to Petition of 
Approval of Market-Based Rates to be effective 10/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 6/19/18.
    Accession Number: 201806195074.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/10/18.

    Docket Numbers: RP18-789-001.
    Applicants: Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, LP.
    Description: Compliance filing Baseline Compliance Filing RP18-789-
000 to be effective 6/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 6/21/18.
    Accession Number: 20180621-5021.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/3/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered, 
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: June 25, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-14123 Filed 6-29-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P