alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Michael T. Vesey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Orleans Homebuilders, Inc.
(the "Company" for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date: February 13, 2004
                                        Michael T. Vesey
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Michael T. Vesey
                                        President and Chief Operating Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000,000
<CIK>                                        0000357261
<NAME>                                       FLORIDA PROGRESS CORPORATION
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          3-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                                           PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                                  3,598
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                                1,231
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       686
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                                     109
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                               175
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             5,799
<COMMON>                                                   1,198
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                          887
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                             2,085
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         25
<PREFERRED>                                                  114
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                       1,621
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                                196
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                             1,758
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                              5,799
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                                    740
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                          27
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                   628
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                   655
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                       85
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                            (2)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                                83
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      33
<NET-INCOME>                                                  50
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                    2
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                                 48
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                      50
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                      0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                       181
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.50
        

</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-3147 DEAN J. BALOURIS, Petitioner,

v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in PH0752060495-I-1. ON MOTION Before PROST, Circuit Judge , FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge , and MOORE, Circuit Judge

. PROST, Circuit Judge

. O R D E R Dean J. Balouris moves (1) for a stay, pen ding review in this court, of the Merit Systems Protection Board’s Ja nuary 4, 2008 order that mo dified the Administrative Judge’s initial decision and (2) for an order to reinstate Balouris or pay him his salary pending disposition of this petition for review. The Administrative Judge mitigated the agency's removal of Balouris to a 60-day suspension. On review, the Board modified the decision to sustain the removal. Balouris states that the agency employed Bal ouris for a period after the AdministrativeJudge’s initial decision but that the agency removed him after the Board's January 4
order. In his motion, Balouris states that he is suffering extreme and undue hardship because of his removal. Specifically, Balouris states that his removal from his job is a great financial burden . However, in Sampson v. Murray , 415 U.S. 61, 89-92 (1974), the Supreme Court held that loss of federal employment and ear nings is not an irreparable harm warranting interim relief because adequate compensatory or other corrective relief
could be available at a later date. Absent a showing of irreparabl e harm, Balouris must show a strong likelihood of
success on the merits to be entitled to a stay, or interim relief, pending review. See Standard Havens Products v. Gencor Indus. , 897 F.2d 511, 512 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (this court considers whether a movant has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits, whether the movant will be irreparably injured absent a stay, whether issuance of the stay wil l substantially injure the ot her side, and where the public interest lies). See also Hilton v. Braunskill , 481 U.S. 770, 779 (1987) (to obtain a stay, a movant must establish a strong likelihoo d on the merits or, failing that, nonetheless
demonstrate a substantial case on the merits provided that the harm factors militate in his favor). In his motion, Balouris does not establish a strong likelihood of success on
the merits. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

2008-3147 - 2 -2008-3147 - 3 - Balouris’s motion is denied. FOR THE COURT

March 6, 2008 /s/ Sharon Prost Date Sharon Prost Circuit Judge cc: Christo J. Balouris, Esq. Jeanne E. Davidson, Esq.
s20
g

(

) 

, 

, 

Air and Radiation Management AdministrationMaryland Department ofthe Environment

1800 Washington Boulevard

Baltimore, Maryland 21230

Dear Mr. Aburn:

On April 22, 2008, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision

to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Maryland Department oftheEnvironment. The SIP revision (SIP revision # 08-02) pertains to the addition ofthe new

Chapter 35 “Control of Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from Adhesives and

Sealants” to COMAR 26.11 and to the amendment of Regulation .30 “Control of Volatile

Organic Compounds from Organic Chemical Production and Polytetrafluoroethylene

Installations” under COMAR 26.11.19. This EPA has determined that the submittal isadministratively and technically complete, and is being reviewed to prepare a Notice of Proposed

Rulemaking (NPR).

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Christopher Cripps,

Air Quality Planning Branch at (215) 814-2179. He is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

Sincerely,

Juth M. Katz, Ditor

Air Protection Division

cc: Shari T. Wilson, Secretary, MDE

Deborah Rabin, Regulations Coordinator, MDE

Customer Service Hotli,ze: 1-800-438-2474
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 932 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 932

  To extend until January 1, 1997, the existing suspension of duty on 
                  certain monochrome glass envelopes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 17, 1993

 Mr. Manzullo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend until January 1, 1997, the existing suspension of duty on 
                  certain monochrome glass envelopes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXISTING SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN 
              MONOCHROME GLASS ENVELOPES.

    Heading 9902.70.11 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States is amended by striking ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/98''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 takes effect on January 1, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
Page 25 EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER                        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                   SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2005 (the Report), I,
Robert S. Hekemian, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1)
the Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. ss. 78m(a) or 78o(d), and,  (2)
the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: September 9, 2005
        /s/ Robert S. Hekemian

Robert S. Hekemian
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer  Back To Index
EXHIBIT 32.1

PC MALL, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of PC Mall, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Frank F. Khulusi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods indicated.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                       
|-----------------------
|March 30, 2006         
|                       
|/s/ Frank F. Khulusi   
|Frank F. Khulusi       
|Chief Executive Officer
Opinion issued April 16, 2024

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 22
- 00859
- CV

——————————— MOHAMMAD RAMEEL SHEIKH , Appella nt

V. SCF RC FUNDING IV LLC , Appell e e

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2021
- 56085

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Mohammad Rameel Sheikh, representing that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences in this appeal and2

the underlying litigation, has filed a n agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a). No opinion has issued. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.1(c)

. Accordingly, we grant appellant’s agreed motion and dismiss the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a); 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Guerra.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                         215,600
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,513,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                   445,500
<INVENTORY>                                    1,385,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,362,200
<PP&E>                                         2,988,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,975,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,797,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,156,500
<BONDS>                                        9,309,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,811,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,745,400)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,797,800
<SALES>                                        2,448,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,448,900
<CGS>                                          2,223,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,223,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               426,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             95,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (296,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (296,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (296,400)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.04)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 766 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 766

  To prohibit the transportation, treatment, storage, or disposal of 
  hazardous waste outside the State in which the waste was generated.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1993

   Mr. English of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the transportation, treatment, storage, or disposal of 
  hazardous waste outside the State in which the waste was generated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TRANSPORTATION, TREATMENT, STORAGE, OR 
              DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE OUTSIDE OF STATE IN WHICH 
              WASTE WAS GENERATED.

    (a) Amendment to Subtitle C.--Subtitle C of the Solid Waste 
Disposal Act is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 3021. PROHIBITION ON TRANSPORTATION, TREATMENT, STORAGE, OR 
              DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE OUTSIDE OF STATE IN WHICH 
              WASTE WAS GENERATED.

    ``Effective January 1, 1994, hazardous waste may not be 
transported, treated, stored, or disposed of outside the State in which 
the waste was generated.''.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--The table of contents for subtitle C of 
such Act (contained in section 1001 of such Act) is amended by adding 
at the end the following new item:

``Sec. 3021. Prohibition on transportation, treatment, storage, or 
                            disposal of hazardous waste outside of 
                            State in which waste was generated.''.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 97 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 97

  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for prompt 
parole into the United States of aliens in order to attend the funeral 
          of an immediate blood relative in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

 Mrs. Mink (for herself and Mr. Abercrombie) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for prompt 
parole into the United States of aliens in order to attend the funeral 
          of an immediate blood relative in the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROMPT PAROLE OF ALIENS IN ORDER TO ATTEND THE FUNERAL OF AN 
              IMMEDIATE BLOOD RELATIVE IN THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) In General.--Section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subparagraph:
    ``(C)(i) The Attorney General shall provide, on an expedited basis, 
for the parole of an alien under this paragraph if--
            ``(I) an immediate blood relative of the alien has died and 
        the funeral for the relative is to be in the United States, and
            ``(II) the alien provides the Attorney General with a 
        certified copy of the death certificate of the relative.
    ``(ii) The period of parole under this subparagraph shall be for 
the period required to attend the funeral and shall not exceed 30 days 
(except as may be provided in exceptional circumstances specified by 
the Attorney General).
    ``(iii) In clause (i), the term `immediate blood relative' means, 
with respect to an alien, the spouse, mother, father, son, daughter, 
brother, or sister of the alien.''.
    (b) Report on Operation of Amendment.--The Attorney General shall 
report to the Congress, not later than 2 years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, on the operation of section 212(d)(5)(C) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (as added by the amendment made by 
subsection (a)) and on any violations or abuses of the immigration laws 
resulting from the parole of aliens into the United States under such 
section.

                                 <all>
```
|                                                        |                                                                |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| MASSEY      ENERGY COMPANY                                  |
|                                                        |                                                                |
| By:                                                         | /s/ John M. Poma                                                    |   |
| Name:                                                       | John      M. Poma                                              |   |
| Title:                                                      | Vice      President and ChiefAdministrative      Officer  |   |
|  /s/ J. Christopher AdkinsJOHN      CHRISTOPHER ADKINS |
H. Res. 131

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

March 17, 1993.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 64) setting forth the

congressional budget for the United States Government for

the fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998. The first

reading of the concurrent resolution shall be dispensed with.

All points of order against the concurrent resolution and

against its consideration are waived. General debate shall be

confined to the congressional budget and shall not exceed ten

hours, with seven hours (including four hours on the subject

of economic goals and policies) equally divided and controlled

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget, two hours controlled by Representative

Mfume of Maryland, and one hour controlled by Representative Solomon of New York. After general debate the Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion. No further consid-
2

HRES 131 EH

eration of the concurrent resolution shall be in order except

pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.

Attest:

Clerk.
02/14/1 1
. r^ARTMENTO F \oPpR;miO N To : U.S
. Departmen to fTransportatio n ' v}ri:RATION S Docke tManagemen tSyste m 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , SE
. - 1 Ffi B ? 2 P 2 2 0 Wes tBuildin g Groun d Floor , Roo m W12-14 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 From : Coasta l Helicopters , LL C Lawrenc e Ihi e P O Bo x71 5 Nag s Head , N C 2795 9 Offic e Phone : 252-475-4354/Fax ; 252-441-906 6 Email : obxhelicopters@gmail.co m T o who m i tma yconcern , W e ar e requestin g a n exemptio n fro m needin g t o maintai n tw o alcoho l an d dru g preventio n programs . W e hav e a smal l FA R 135 , 'O n Demand' , charte roperatio n an d a Part9 1 ai rtou roperation , bot h unde rth e sam e compan yname , Coasta l Helicopters , LLC
. W e hav e on e aircraf tarx i on e pilot
. Th e situatio n o fhavin g tw o separat e dru g program s give s th e pilo tth e possibilit yo fbein g randoml yselecte d fo rtestin g fo rbot h operation s a tth e sam e time
. I ta s wel l mor e tha n double s th e expens e t o th e compan y t o maintai n bot h programs . Becaus e w e ar e a smal l operation , thi s amount s t o a finar>cia l hardshi p t o us . B yallowin g u s t o maintai n a singl e dru g an d alcoho l preventio n program , I fc>elieve thi s wil l stil l mee tth e intende d goal s o fth e Alcoho l an d Dru g Preventio n Progra m an d monitorin g fo rth e FAA
. I a m therefor e requestin g tha ta n exemptio n b e granted , allowin g u s t o hav e ou rsingl e pilo ti n on e Alcoho l an d Dru g PreverYtio n program . Ou rPar t13 5 charte roperatior wcert'rficat e numbe ri s 9COA719M
. Ou rPart9 1 ai rtou r operation s certificat e numt>e ri s LIHJAW95
. I fyo u hav e an yquestions , pleas e fee l fre e t o contac tm e anytim e a t th e following : Cel l 252-928-8074
. Than k yo u ver ymuc h fo ryou rconsideratio n o fthi s request . Lawrenc e Ihl e Coasta l Helicopters
. LL C
#### Ronald D. FRIEDMAN et al., Appellants, v. WORK FORCE, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-719.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 13, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.