alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THE STATE *vs.*THOMAS JOHNSON, (Free Negro.)

Confessions—admissibility of paroi proof of.

The defendant was tried at the Sussex spring sessions, 1853, for breaking and entering a store house and stealing certain goods therefrom.

A confession of the prisoner, made before the magistrate, was offered in evidence and objected to, unless the State first proved that it was not reduced to writing.

*The Court*

said, that it was the magistrate’s duty in the case to reduce the prisoner’s confession to writing and read it to him, and offer it for his signature. *(Code,*2028.) That the court would presume this to have been done; (3 *Harr. Rep.,*554;) but this would not of itself exclude paroi evidence of the confession. It was the recognition of the written statement by the prisoner’s signature, which made it better evidence than paroi proof, and this was a *fact*not to be presumed, but to be proved, in order to exclude the paroi evidence. Evidence admitted.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Frank F.
Khulusi and Richard M. Finkbeiner and each of them, as attorneys-in-fact, each
with the power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Creative Computers, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
and any amendment to such Form 10-K Annual Report and to file the same, with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting to said attorneys-in-fact, and each
of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact or any of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

         Signature                          Title                        Date
         ---------                          -----                        -----
<S>                                  <C>                           <C>

FRANK F. KHULUSI                     Chairman of the Board of      March 27, 1997
--------------------------------     Directors, President and
Frank F. Khulusi                     Chief Executive Officer
                                     (Principal Executive Officer)


RICHARD M. FINKBEINER                Chief Financial Officer       March 27, 1997
--------------------------------     (Principal Financial and
Richard M. Finkbeiner                Accounting Officer)

SAM U. KHULUSI                       Director                      March 27, 1997
--------------------------------
Sam U. Khulusi

AHMED O. ALFI                        Director                      March 27, 1997
--------------------------------
Ahmed O. Alfi

AL S. JOSEPH                         Director                      March 27, 1997
--------------------------------
Al S. Joseph
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF GENERAL
CREDIT CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       7,733,481
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,358,957
<ALLOWANCES>                                   333,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,948,742
<PP&E>                                         607,515
<DEPRECIATION>                                 184,230
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,562,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,749,487
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,663
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,816,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,562,503
<SALES>                                      2,790,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,790,818
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,333,284
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               150,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             797,311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (280,588)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (280,588)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (280,588)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)


</TABLE>
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45737

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

NATHAN RAY TORRES,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: November 8, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin 

Falls County. Hon. Ned C. Williamson, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of three years, for battery on a police/peace officer or 

sheriff, affirmed. 

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;

and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Nathan Ray Torres pled guilty to battery on a police/peace officer or sheriff. I.C. § 19-

2513. The district court sentenced Torres to a unified term of five years, with a minimum period 

of confinement of three years. Torres appeals, arguing that his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Torres’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joseph Fershion ASHER, Jr. v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 53146.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1973.

In re: Joseph Fershion Asher, Jr. applying for writs of habeas corpus and mandamus.

Writ refused. Since the trial judge has transmitted a copy of his ruling to relator, this application is now moot.
#### Raymond HOWE et al., Appellants, v. Dorothy E. HOWE, as personal representative of the Estate of Howard Howe, Deceased, Appellee.

No. GG-42.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 7, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 3, 1978.

Robert J. Gorman of Brennan, McAliley, Albury & Hayskar, Fort Pierce, for appellants.

William E. Sherman of Landis, Graham, French, Husfeld, Sherman & Ford, P. A., DeLand, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Although the order for sale entered April 4,1977, appears not to have been predicated on an adjudication of the interests of the estate in the property that was subject to the order, the record contains indications of consent by the parties to the court’s exercise of jurisdiction over the property for certain purposes, even absent such an adjudication. The record otherwise provides an unsatisfactory basis for determination of *1243any error in the order from which the appeal was taken. Without prejudice to proceedings for a decisive determination of the estate’s interest in the property, or for reconsideration of the appealed order in the light of subsequent events, the order is

AFFIRMED. See Fla.R.P. & G.P. 5.100; *Baker v. Baker,*327 So.2d 205 (Fla.1976).

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metromedia International Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated
this 10th day of October, 2003.

| |  | METROMEDIA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.                                                                                                                             
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/HAROLD F. PYLE, IIIHarold F. Pyle, III Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

---

QuickLinks
### June 25, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GREGORY T. JOSEFSBER G , Appellant
NO. 14

- 12

- 00613

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , and that this decision be certified below for observance.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 973

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to strengthen

provisions relating to disclosures in campaign advertisements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 18, 1993

Mr. GORDON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

strengthen provisions relating to disclosures in campaign

advertisements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CAMPAIGN ADVERTISING AMENDMENTS.

4 Section 318 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

5 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441d) is amended—

6 (1) in the matter before paragraph (1) of sub7 section (a), by striking out ‘‘an expenditure’’ and in8 serting in lieu thereof ‘‘a disbursement’’;

9 (2) in the matter before paragraph (1) of sub10 section (a), by striking out ‘‘direct’’;
2

•HR 973 IH

1 (3) in paragraph (3) of subsection (a), by in2 serting after ‘‘name’’ the following: ‘‘and permanent

3 street address’’; and

4 (4) by adding at the end the following new sub5 sections:

6 ‘‘(c) Any printed communication described in sub7 section (a) shall be—

8 ‘‘(1) of sufficient type size to be clearly read9 able by the recipient of the communication;

10 ‘‘(2) contained in a printed box set apart from

11 the other contents of the communication; and

12 ‘‘(3) consist of a reasonable degree of color con13 trast between the background and the printed state14 ment.

15 ‘‘(d)(1) Any broadcast or cablecast communication

16 described in subsection (a)(1) or subsection (a)(2) shall

17 include, in addition to the requirements of those sub18 sections an audio statement by the candidate that identi19 fies the candidate and states that the candidate has ap20 proved the communication.

21 ‘‘(2) If a broadcast or cablecast communication de22 scribed in paragraph (1) is broadcast or cablecast by

23 means of television, the statement required by paragraph

24 (1) shall—
3

•HR 973 IH

1 ‘‘(A) appear in a clearly readable manner with

2 a reasonable degree of color contrast between the

3 background and the printed statement, for a period

4 of at least 4 seconds; and

5 ‘‘(B) be accompanied by a clearly identifiable

6 photographic or similar image of the candidate.

7 ‘‘(e) Any broadcast or cablecast communication de8 scribed in subsection (a)(3) shall include, in addition to

9 the requirements of those subsections, in a clearly spoken

10 manner, the following statement—

11 ‘ is responsible for the content of

12 this advertisement.’

13 with the blank to be filled in with the name of the political

14 committee or other person paying for the communication

15 and the name of any connected organization of the payor;

16 and, if broadcast or cablecast by means of television, shall

17 also appear in a clearly readable manner with a reasonable

18 degree of color contrast between the background and the

19 printed statement, for a period of at least 4 seconds.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    the accompanying Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
(the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/  Randy L. KotlerRandy L. KotlerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Mack Charles WATSON, a/k/a Mack Charles Watson, Jr., William Bailey and Jimmie Wilson, Petitioners, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 39739.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 31, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 234 So.2d 143.

ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ADKINS, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, C. J., and BOYD, J., dissent.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0908 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2010-NM-251-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000040643
<NAME>                        FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-97
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        2,926
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 11,992
<ALLOWANCES>                  3,575
<INVENTORY>                   20,640
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              40,785
<P,P&E>                       31,635
<DEPRECIATION>                18,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                93,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         11,117
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      1,363
<OTHER-SE>                    47,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  93,898
<SALES>                       20,875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              20,875
<CGS>                         12,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 12,270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              9,095
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0            
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            595
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,085)
<INCOME-TAX>                  (391)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (694)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (694)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13




August 27, 1999


Robert J. Eve

Dear Bob:

Chain Link Technologies, Inc., is pleased to offer you the position of Vice
President of Alliances.

Your compensation will be as follows:

     .  Your rate of pay will be one hundred and fifty thousand dollars
        ($150,000) per year.
     .  Your salary will increase to one hundred and sixty thousand dollars
        ($160,000) effective January 1, 2000.
     .  You will receive 25% bonus at target.
     .  You will be awarded stock options in the amount of two hundred thousand
        (200,000) shares from our Stock Option Plan. These options will be
        vested over a period of four years. The vesting period will begin on the
        date of your employment at Chain Link Technologies, Inc.

You will be awarded stock options in the amount of two hundred thousand
(200,000) shares from our Stock Option Plan.  These options will be vested over
a period of four years.  The vesting period will begin on the date of your
employment at Chain Link Technologies, Inc.

Additional benefits effective on your start date will be:

     .  Full medical, dental and optical insurance
     .  Life insurance
     .  Long-term disability insurance
     .  401(k) Savings Plan

Please refer to the attachment entitled Chain Link Employee Benefits for a brief
description of the items in your compensation package.

This offer letter shall supercede any verbal commitment you may have received
from any representative of Chain Link Technologies, Inc.  We look forward to
having you join us in a mutually beneficial relationship.  Please contact me if
you have any questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Raj Jain
President

I have read and accept the terms stated above.

/s/ Robert J. Eve                signed on          7-Sep-99
---------------------------------         --------------------------------.
Bob Eve                                             Date

I plan to report to work at Chain Link Technologies, Inc. on     24-Sep-99
                                                            --------------.
# Official Journal C 286/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 286 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 596 August 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 286

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 596 August 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 286/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2016/C 286/02 | Notice of the Government of Denmark pursuant to Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 286/01

Euro exchange rates

1

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2016/C 286/02

Notice of the Government of Denmark pursuant to Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products

2

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Howard S. Modlin,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, and I, William G.
Henry, Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer,
each of General DataComm Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), do each hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge that:
 
 (1) The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended  June 30,
2008 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 This Certification accompanies this
Form 10-Q as an exhibit, but shall not be deemed as having been filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or as a separate
disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officer.
 
 
 /s/ Howard S.
      ModlinDate:  August
      14, 2008
              
              
              
              Howard
      S. Modlin,Chairman
      of the Board, President andChief
      Executive Officer/s/ William G.
      HenryWilliam
      G. HenryVice
      President, Finance and Administrationand
      Chief Financial Officer