alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Donald M. Bennett, Petitioner, v Michael J. Bintz, as Superintendent of Riverview Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[736 NYS2d 495]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting interference with a facility employee and harassment. In the misbehavior report, the reporting correction officer alleged that he had observed petitioner standing at the medication window in the facility’s infirmary carrying on a lengthy discussion with the nurse who was on duty. As evidenced by a log entry, entered a week earlier, the officer had previously admonished petitioner to desist from bothering this nurse. Substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt was presented in the form of the misbehavior report, the log entry, a memorandum authored by the nurse who averred that petitioner had made inappropriately personal comments to her on several occasions and that she had twice asked him to stop, and petitioner’s own testimony wherein he conceded that he had given the nurse personal compliments on previous occasions *(see, Matter of Hamlett v Strack,*273 AD2d 587; *Matter of Kalwasinski v Senkowski,*244 AD2d 738, 739). Petitioner’s assertion that the misbehavior report was filed against him in retaliation for grievances that he had filed against another nurse arising out of unrelated incidents is not supported by the record and, in any event, raised issues of credibility for resolution *792by the Hearing Officer *(see, Matter of Flowers v Barkley,*244 AD2d 682, 683). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his allegation of Hearing Officer bias, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Her cure, Peters, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         5593
<SECURITIES>                                   35076
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10079
<ALLOWANCES>                                   190
<INVENTORY>                                    10789
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               65270
<PP&E>                                         28199
<DEPRECIATION>                                 18926
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 78822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4006
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9009
<OTHER-SE>                                     48929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   78822
<SALES>                                        18617
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               21508
<CGS>                                          10400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  17847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               191
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             235
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3235
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1110
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2125
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2125
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .27



</TABLE>
#### Lennon JONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1240.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 26, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 715

To amend title 18, United States Code, to extend the prohibitions against

assaulting certain Federal officers and employees to State or local officials assisting in the enforcement of Federal criminal law at the request

of a Federal agency.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1993

Mr. FIELDS of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to extend the prohibitions against assaulting certain Federal officers and employees to State or local officials assisting in the enforcement of Federal criminal law at the request of a Federal

agency.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State and Local Law

5 Enforcers Protection Act of 1993’’.
2

•HR 715 IH

1 SEC. 2. TITLE 18 AMENDMENT.

2 Section 111 of title 18, United States Code, is

3 amended—

4 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting ‘‘, or any

5 designated non-Federal official,’’ before ‘‘while en6 gaged in’’; and

7 (2) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting ‘‘, or any

8 designated non-Federal official,’’ before ‘‘on ac9 count’’; and

10 (3) by adding at the end the following:

11 ‘‘(c) As used in subsection (a) of this section, the

12 term ‘designated non-Federal official’ means a State or

13 local official assisting Federal officers or employees in the

14 enforcement of Federal criminal law, at the request of a

15 Federal agency.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 99.1








May 17, 2012

Analyst Contact:
Andrew Ziola918-588-7163Media Contact:
Brad Borror918-588-7582
  ONEOK Partners to Participate in National Association of
 Publicly Traded Partnerships Investor Conference
  TULSA, Okla. – May. 17, 2012 -- ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will present at the National Association of Publicly Traded Partnerships Investor Conference on Thursday, May 24, 2012, in Greenwich, Conn.
  Terry K. Spencer, ONEOK Partners president, will present at the conference at 8 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (7 a.m. Central Daylight Time).
  The conference will be webcast and will be accessible on ONEOK Partners' website http://www.oneokpartners.com/. A replay of the webcast will be archived for 30 days after the conference.
  The company will also post the presentation on its website that morning, beginning at 8 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (7 a.m. Central Daylight Time).
  ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation's premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy company, which owns 43.4 percent of the overall partnership interest. ONEOK is one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S.
  For more information, visit the website at http://www.oneokpartners.com/.
  For the latest news about ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKPartners.
 
 ###
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Signature Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated this 1st of July, 2011.
  /s/ Craig NoellCraig NoellPresident and Chief Executive Officer
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 847

AN ACT

To provide for planning and design of a National

Dulles International Airport.Air and Space Museum extension at Washington
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 847

AN ACT

To provide for planning and design of a National Air and

Space Museum extension at Washington Dulles International Airport.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PLAN FOR NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM

4 EXTENSION.

5 The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution

6 shall have authority to plan and design an extension of

7 the National Air and Space Museum at Washington Dul8 les International Airport.
2

HR 847 EH1S

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 There is authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years

3 beginning after September 30, 1993, a total of $8,000,000

4 to carry out this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives June 29 (legislative day, June 28), 1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains a summary financial information extracted from the
Statements of Operations and Balance Sheets and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             256
<SECURITIES>                                    11,398
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                       444
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,044
<PP&E>                                           6,161
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,020
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,455
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,524)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,200
<SALES>                                         11,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,149
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,076
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (49)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (887)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        21
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (908)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       163
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

September 24, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00652-CR

MONZELLE LAVAN STEPTOE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 149th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 58852

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Monzelle Lavan Steptoe has attempted to appeal the trial court’s 

order signed July 29, 2019, denying appellant’s request for the appointment of 

counsel to pursue post-conviction relief under article 64.01 of the Texas Code of 

Criminal Procedure. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01(c). On August 28, 

2019, the State filed a motion to dismiss the appeal contending the trial court’s order 

denying the appointment of counsel is not an appealable order. 
2

The trial court’s denial of a request for the appointment of counsel to pursue 

post-conviction relief under article 64.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 

is not an immediately appealable order. See Gutierrez v. State, 307 S.W.3d 318, 323 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2010) (appeal from an order denying appellant’s request for 

appointment of counsel under article 64.01(c) is “premature” because “a motion for 

appointed counsel is a preliminary matter that precedes the initiation of Chapter 64 

proceedings”). 

Accordingly, the State’s motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is ordered 

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Hassan.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from General
Binding Corporation's Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1995 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           5,192
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,222 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,275
<INVENTORY>                                     82,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,490
<PP&E>                                         127,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,285
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 295,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,297
<BONDS>                                         43,937
<COMMON>                                         2,262
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     148,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   295,217
<SALES>                                        339,855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               339,855
<CGS>                                          192,679
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,303
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,888
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,755
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,133
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,133
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.02
<FN>
<F1>
Notes and accounts receivable-trade are stated net of allowances for doubtful
accounts and sales returns.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











I, Christopher M. Rasmussen, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer), certify that this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained herein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gateway Energy Corporation and its subsidiaries for the periods presented.








Date:  May 17, 2010                                                                                                                                                                             /s/ Christopher M. Rasmussen


Christopher M. Rasmussen


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 12(a)

		   FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
	COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
							       Nine Months
								  Ended
							       September 30,           Years Ended December 31,
								   1999        1998     1997     1996     1995     1994
											(Millions of Dollars)
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings, as defined:
  Net income ............................................        $  577       $  664   $  618   $  579   $  553   $  519
  Income taxes ..........................................           291          279      304      294      329      307
  Fixed charges, included in the determination of
    net income, as below ................................           170          335      304      283      308      337
  Distributed income of independent power investments....            46           68       47       38       39       28
  Less: Equity in earnings of independent power
    investments .........................................            54           39       14        5        6       (3)
      Total earnings, as defined ........................        $1,030       $1,307   $1,259   $1,189   $1,223   $1,194

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges ......................................        $  163       $  322   $  291   $  267   $  291   $  319
  Rental interest factor ................................             3            4        4        5        6        7
  Fixed charges included in nuclear fuel cost ...........             4            9        9       11       11       11
  Fixed charges, included in the determination of net
    income ..............................................           170          335      304      283      308      337
  Capitalized interest ..................................             5            2        4        -        -        -

      Total fixed charges, as defined ...................        $  175       $  337   $  308   $  283   $  308   $  337

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ......................          5.89         3.88     4.09     4.20     3.97     3.54
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 831 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 831

To provide that cost-of-living adjustments in rates of pay for Members 
  of Congress be made contingent on there not being a deficit in the 
                budget of the United States Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1993

Mr. Ewing (for himself, Mr. Ravenel, Mr. Smith of Oregon, Mr. Poshard, 
    Mr. Thomas of Wyoming, Mr. Goss, Mr. Goodling, Mr. Allard, Mr. 
    Hutchinson, Mr. Stump, Mr. Baker of Louisiana, Mr. Bartlett of 
Maryland, Mr. Zeliff, Mr. Klink, Mr. Skeen, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Torkildsen, 
and Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred jointly to the Committees on House Administration and Post 
                        Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that cost-of-living adjustments in rates of pay for Members 
  of Congress be made contingent on there not being a deficit in the 
                budget of the United States Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONDITION FOR COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENTS.

    Section 601(a)(2) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 
U.S.C. 31(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(2) Effective'' and inserting ``(2)(A) 
        Except as provided in subparagraph (B), effective''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(B)(i) An adjustment under subparagraph (A) which is scheduled to 
take effect in a calendar year shall not be implemented if the budget 
of the United States Government was in deficit for the last fiscal year 
ending before the first day of such calendar year, as determined under 
clause (ii).
    ``(ii) Not later than 2 months after the end of each fiscal year, 
the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall--
            ``(I) determine whether the budget of the United States 
        Government was in deficit for such fiscal year and, if so, the 
        amount of such deficit; and
            ``(II) submit a written report to the Congress as to its 
        findings under this clause.''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to any pay 
adjustment scheduled to take effect after the end of the 90-day period 
beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 4.8


                                         July 7, 2004



Wireless Frontier Internet, Inc.
104 West Callaghan Street
Fort Stockton, Texas 79735

Gentlemen:

      I hereby contribute to the capital stock of Wireless Frontier Internet,
Inc. (the "Company") one million one hundred thousand (1,100,000) shares (the
"Shares") of the common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company
held by me, pursuant to the attached Stock Power, and hereby irrevocably
surrender any right, title or interest that I have to such Shares.

                                    Very truly yours,



                                    Jaime R. Velasco
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Jimmy L. TAYLOR v. Hon. M. BRANIFF, Judge, Section "B", Criminal District Court, Orleans Parish.

No. 60614.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1977.

In re: Jimmy L. Taylor applying for remedial writ.

Writ denied. The matter is moot. The remand order was granted August 30, 1977.