alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Government National Mortgage Association

15 Year Multiple Issuer Pool Numbers

NOTE:

CUSIP MIP # POOL 

TYPE

SECURITY 

INTEREST 

RATE

TERM 

YEARS

INITIAL PAY 

DATE

TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL # OF 

LOAN 

PACKAGES

TOTAL # OF 

MORTGAGES 

(Loans)

MA9508 1 36179YR55 36179YR30 MA9506 SF 3.000 15 04/20/2024 $92,179.00 1 Created March 25, 2024

 This is the Finalized list of the 15 Year Multiple Issuer Pool Numbers for Issue Month of March 2024. MARCH 2024 - FINALIZED MA9513 SF 6.500 15 04/20/2024 $1,181,975.00 8 11 180 36179YSA3 MA9511 SF 5.500 15 04/20/2024 $32,891,958.00 35 50 36179YR89 MA9509 SF 4.500 15 04/20/2024 $10,607,609.00 15 1 36179YR63 36179YR48 MA9507 SF 3.500 15 04/20/2024 $60,628.00 1 1

SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT JANET KERR AT 1-800-234-4662, OPTION #3 OR 212-815-3221. MA9514 SF 7.000 15 04/20/2024 $90,881.00 2 2 63 36179YSB1 MA9512 SF 6.000 15 04/20/2024 $10,159,832.00 20 135 36179YR97 MA9510 SF 5.000 15 04/20/2024 $27,118,311.00 35 8 36179YR71 SF 4.000 15 04/20/2024 $1,621,226.00 5
APPENDIX E1

Nonroad Source Emissions

2007, 2017, 2025

(Provided in Electronic Form Only)

Bureau of Air Quality

Department of Environmental Protection
[This page intentionally left blank.]
NA Area County Percent of County

Liberty‐Clairton Allegheny 1.53%

Pgh‐Beaver Allegheny 98.47%

Pgh‐Beaver Armstrong 3.96%

Pgh‐Beaver Greene 4.06%

Pgh‐Beaver Lawrence 1.15%
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906


of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Friedman Industries,
Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ben Harper, Senior Vice
President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  February 14, 2008



| |                  
| | -----------------
| | By /s/ BEN HARPER
| |                  
| | Name: Ben Harper 

| |        |                                                      
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------
| | Title: | Senior Vice President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer
#### AQUILLA DERRICKSON *vs.*JOHN SPRINGER.

The easement of a right of way through another’s land may exist by prescription ; by grant; by usage, or from necessity.

Quere.—Whether there can be in this country a prescriptive right of way?

This was an action of trespass to real property. Pleas, not guilty; justification under a right of way, and by prescription.

On the defence of 'a justification by right of a private way over plaintiff’s land, the court charged as follows:—

Private ways may exist—1. By prescription; 2. by grant; 3. by adverse and uninterrupted use for twenty years and upwards; 4. by necessity.

Whether a right of way can exist in this new country by prescription, we need not decide, as a right by prescription strictly must (it is said) be for time out of memory. The other modes may be said all to exist by grant, as both the right from long usage, and from necessity, presupposes a grant of which they are the evidence. A right of way by necessity, is where one person sells to another a part of a tract of land to which there is no access whatever, except through the grantor’s land; the law implies the grant of -a right of way from necessity, through such land.

The right of way by usage must be on proof of uninterrupted, adverse usage for twenty years and upwards, in opposition to the owner of the land, and without any reference to a permission or license from him.

On the facts of this case:—Charles Springer, sen., prior to 1789, was the owner of the mansion farm, now owned in part by the defendant. Between that and the limestone road, the farms of Williams and McDonald, now owned by plaintiff intervened; and it was *22alledged that there was then and for a long time before, a right of way from the Springer mansion farm, through the Williams and McDonald farm, to the public road. Conceding that this was proved, it was also proved that all three of these farms were purchased by Benjamin Springer, viz: the Charles Springer mansion, in 1789, the Williams tract in 1795, and the McDonald tract in 1805; and if there was any such right of way in the owner of the Springer tract over the other tracts, this easement or privilege was extinguished when the full title in all these tracts vested in Benjamin Springer. He could not hold the entire title to the land, subject to an easement of a right of way in himself; and those who claim under him cannot set up such an easement as existing against him, though it may have existed before this unity of title.

Rogers, for plaintiff.

*Platt,*for defendant.

On Benjamin Springer’s death the Williams and McDonald tracts were sold for the payment of his debts, and bought by plaintiff; the Springer mansion was assigned in the Orphans’ Court to the defendant, and to the widow in dower, without any reservation of a right of way.

If the Springer land had been sold and the other assigned, there might be some pretence of a right of way from necessity; but on a sale of the land *through which*the way is claimed, there is no necessity of implying the grant of a way by necessity; for it might have been reserved out of the sale.

Verdict for plaintiff.
EXHIBIT 15

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Frischs Restaurants, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying interim
consolidated balance sheet of Frischs Restaurants, Inc. (an Ohio Corporation) and subsidiaries as of September 18, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders equity and cash flows for the sixteen week
periods ended September 18, 2007 and September 19, 2006. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries
of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the
financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications
that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of May 29, 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, shareholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated July 24, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
|Cincinnati, Ohio      
|October 24, 2007
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 2, 2011 

p1026 

Order 

 

November 2, 2011 

143123 

Estate of DARRYL HOUSTON PRICE. _________________________________________ 

NASTASSIA PRICE and ERIN DUFFY-PRICE, 

Personal Representatives of the Estate of Darryl 

Houston Price, 

Plaintiffs, 

v SC: 143123 

 COA: 295212 

Ingham CC: 06-000228-NZ 

LORI JEAN KOSMALSKI and TRADE 

DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a/k/a TRADE 

WORLD COMPANY, INC., 

Defendants, 

and 

Estate of RUDAFORD R. STERRETT, JR., 

 Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

THOMAS WOODS, Receiver, 

 Appellee, 

and 

DART BANK, 

 Intervening Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 12, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

address: (1) whether a mortgagee must affirmatively consent to the appointment of a 

receiver to be required to pay the receiver’s costs and fees; (2) whether the statutory right 

of first priority belonging to the holder of the recorded mortgage, MCL 600.3236, 

overrides the common-law rule that a receiver’s costs and fees are entitled to first 

priority; and (3) whether a mortgagee must actually benefit from the incurred expenses or 

whether a mortgagee can be required to pay for expenses that did not benefit it. 

 The Michigan Association of Realtors, the Michigan Chamber of Commerce, and 

the Real Property Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan are invited to file briefs 

amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues 

presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
#### Victorine WOODSUM v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC LIBRARY.

No. 54528.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 5, 1974.

In re: Victorine Woodsum, applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 289 So.2d 878.

Not considered. Rehearing not applied for in Court of Appeal.
EXHIBIT 99.1

SNODGRASS

Certified Public Accountants and Consultants

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors

First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc.

We have
reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary as of June 30, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30,
2006 and 2005, and the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders equity and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope
than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express
such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them
to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the
year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 18, 2006 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ S. R. Snodgrass, A.C.
|Wheeling, West Virginia  
|                         
|August 9, 2006           

S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

980 National Road Wheeling, WV 26003-6400 Phone: 304-233-5030 Facsimile: 304-233-3062
#### Nancy GILLIAM et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 42954.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 24, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 983

To amend The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance

Act to provide disaster assistance for costs of operation of a transit

system during a major disaster.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 18, 1993

Mr. LIPINSKI (for himself, Mr. DELLUMS, MS. NORTON, and Mr.

BLACKWELL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To amend The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to provide disaster assistance for

costs of operation of a transit system during a major

disaster.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISASTER ASSISTANCE FOR TRANSIT SYSTEM

4 OPERATIONS.

5 (a) CONTRIBUTIONS.—Section 406(a)(1) of The Rob6 ert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance

7 Act (42 U.S.C. 5172(a)(1)) is amended by inserting before

8 the semicolon the following: ‘‘and for revenue lost due to
2

•HR 983 IH

1 the inability of the State or local government to operate

2 a transit system as a result of the major disaster’’.

3 (b) COMMUNITY DISASTER LOANS.—The first sen4 tence of section 417(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 5184(a))

5 is amended by inserting before the comma the following:

6 ‘‘(including losses associated with the operation of a tran7 sit system)’’.

8 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

9 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply with

10 respect to a major disaster occurring on or after January

11 1, 1989.

Æ
Exhibit 23.1






            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors

TMS, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (no. 333-
65604) on Form S-8 of TMS, Inc. of our report dated November 8, 2004 relating to
the balance sheets of TMS, Inc. as of August 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the years
then ended, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears
in the August 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of TMS, Inc.



KPMG LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
November 10, 2004
Fundamental Concepts for Indexing and Referencing

(4 hours)

Course Overview

Having quality audit documentation is a fundamental part of an audit organization’s quality 

assurance process. This 4-hour course covers various topics including what is meant by 

“indexing and referencing”, why is it important, how an auditor needs to link indexing and 

referencing to the evidence that has been collected, and the role of referencing as a quality 

control process outlined in the Yellow Book.

CPEs: 4

Who Should Attend

This course can be a refresher for seasoned auditors or for new staff so they can understand 

the critical role of appropriate audit documentation. This course can also provide a context and 

framework for an entity’s own approach for documenting audit findings.

Course Objectives

Participants will be better able to understand

• Indexing and referencing as a fundamental part of the quality assurance process

• Fundamental concepts of indexing and referencing

• Roles and responsibilities of team members and referencers

Course Topics

Introduction to Indexing and Referencing

• Importance of Quality Control

• What is meant by indexing and referencing

• Linking indexing and referencing to evidence

Fundamentals of Indexing

• The role of indexing in report accuracy

• Planning for indexing

• The role of audit documentation

• Tracing and verifying summary documents

• Indexing sources and issues
Fundamentals of Referencing

• How referencing supports audit quality

• Referencing process: the audit team

• Referencing process: the referencer
DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 17, 2020 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00609-CV 

CARLA D. EVANS, Appellant 

V. 

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE SERVICES AND OLD AMERICAN 

COUNTY MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO., Appellees 

On Appeal from the 95th District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-11979 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Partida-Kipness 

Opinion by Justice Osborne 

By letter filed August 21, 2020, appellant informed the Court the case had 

settled. Appellant has taken no other action or otherwise communicated with the 

Court since then. Accordingly, we construe the letter as a motion to dismiss and 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

200609F.P05 

/Leslie Osborne/ 

LESLIE OSBORNE 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

CARLA D. EVANS, Appellant 

No. 05-20-00609-CV V. 

UNITED AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE SERVICES AND 

OLD AMERICAN COUNTY 

MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO., 

Appellees 

 On Appeal from the 95th District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-11979. 

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Osborne, Justices Schenck and 

Partida-Kipness participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

 Subject to any agreement among the parties, we ORDER that appellees 

United Automobile Insurance Services and Old American County Mutual Fire Ins. 

Co. recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Carla D. Evans. 

Judgment entered September 17, 2020.
# Official Journal C 265A/13 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 265A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5813 August 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 265A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5813 August 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Council |
| 2015/C 265A/01 | Notice of cancellation | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Council

2015/C 265A/01

Notice of cancellation

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of SystemOne Technologies
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul I.
Mansur, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and, I, Steven M. Healy,
Director of Finance and Administration of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Paul I. Mansur
------------------------------------------
Paul I. Mansur
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2003

/s/ Steven M. Healy
------------------------------------------
Steven M. Healy
Director of Finance and Administration
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
March 31, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1234
BRIAN L. HOWARD; LINDA B. HOWARD, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus LAMBERTS CABLE SPLICING, a/k/a Lamberts’ Cable Splicing Company, Inc., a/k/a Lambert’s Cable Splicing Company, a/k/a Lamberts Cable Splicing Company, LLC, a Delaware LLC, a/k/a Lamberts Cable Splicing Company of Florida, LLC; THOMAS L. LAMBERT, a/k/a Thomas L. Lambert, Jr., a/k/a Tom Lambert, a/k/a Tom or Thomas Lambert, Jr., a/k/a Tommy Lambert; KAREN LAMBERT ALLEN, a/k/a Karen Lambert Allan; DYCOM INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, a/k/a Dycom Corporation, a/k/a Dycom Investments, Inc., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:05-cv-00636-F) Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 19, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.- 2 - Brian L. Howard, Linda B. Howard, Appellants Pro Se. Scott David Zimmerman, BROWN & BUNCH, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Brian L. Howard and Linda B. Howard appeal the district court’s order dism issing their civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeHoward v. Lambert Cable Splicing , No. 5:05-cv00636-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Multifamily Database File Layout 

Multifamily Terminated Pools File Layout 

The Multifamily_Database.zip and Multifamily_Terminated_Pools.zip documents are compressed, each 

containing one 'CSV' (Comma Separated Values) file. Once expanded, they can be opened by Excel or 

notepad. Four fields may contain leading zeroes and have been modified to start with an equal sign to 

ensure that the leading zeroes are displayed in Excel. There is an asterisk in the Data Item Column to 

indicate the affected fields.

Data Item CSV Column Name Data Type

Pool Number * POOL_NO String

Pool Type POOL_TYPE String

Issuer Number ISS_NO Numeric

Issuer Name NAME String

Issuer Address 1 ADDR1 String

Issuer Address 2 ADDR2 String

Issuer City CITY String

Issuer State STATE String

Issuer Zip Code 1 * ZIP1 Numeric

Issuer Zip Code 2 * ZIP2 Numeric

Issue Type ISS_TYPE String

Pool Issue Date ISS_DATE Date (MMDDYYYY)

Original Issued Amount ORIG_AGR Numeric

Pool Maturity Date MATUR_DATE Date (MMDDYYYY)

Maturity Term TERM String

Current RPB Amount CUR_RPB Numeric

CUSIP Number CUSIP_NO String

Security Interest Rate INT_RATE Numeric

1 Month Delinquent DELQ1MO Numeric

2 Months Delinquent DELQ2MO Numeric

3 Months Delinquent DELQ3MO Numeric

Case Number * CASE_NO Numeric

FHA/RD Program FHA_PROGR String

Lockout Term L_TERM Numeric

Property City CITY_LOCATED String

Property State STATE_LOCATED String

Lockout Period End Date LPERIOD_END_DATE Date (MMDDYYYY)

Prepayment Premium Period PREP_PERIOD Numeric

Loan Origination Date LOAN_ORIG_DATE Date (MMDDYYYY)

First Pay Date FIRST_PAY_DATE Date (MMDDYYYY)

Endorsement Date ENDORS_DATE Date (MMDDYYYY)
Data Item CSV Column Name Data Type

Mortgage Maturity Date MATUR_DATE Date (MMDDYYYY)

Interest Rate INT_RATE Numeric

FHA Insurance Type FHA_INSUR String

Principal Interest Amount PRIN_INT_AMT Numeric

Original Principal Balance ORIG_PRIN_BAL Numeric

Prepayment End Date PREP_END_DATE Date (MMDDYYYY)

Initial Endorsement Date IENDORS_DATE Date (MMDDYYYY)

Prepayment Description PREP_DESCR String

Description of Non-Level Adjustment 

Period 

NLPOOL_DESCR String

Filler FILLER String