alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Prepared by: TF

Reviewed by: GC Page 1 of 2

UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE COST UNIT RATE

I. COMPLETE PRODUCT:

(a) Black only, per page (whether printed or blank) .....

...................................................per 100 copies 28,525 1.58 45,069.50 1.98 56,479.50 1.52 43,358.00 1.62 46,210.50 1.60

(b) Color only ...(per color side) ........... per 100 copies 71 19.00 1,349.00 10.00 710.00 18.27 1,297.17 18.00 1,278.00 19.00

II. ADDITIONAL OPERATIONS:

(a) Proof of color pages ......................per color page 20 NC 0.00 25.00 500.00 6.29 125.80 NC 0.00 NC

(b) Black copy face only of tab dividers, mylar reinforce

tab, clear mylar reinforce bind edge, including cost

of divider, and collate within text ... ..per 100 dividers 79 12.00 948.00 20.00 1,580.00 16.79 1,326.41 14.00 1,106.00 12.00

(c) Black copy face and back of tab dividers, mylar

reinforce tab, clear mylar reinforce bind edge,

including cost of divider, and collate within text .......

...............................................per 100 dividers 40 15.00 600.00 26.00 1,040.00 19.67 786.80 18.00 720.00 15.00

(d) Furnish and place clear plastic protector in front of 

cover and clear or black plastic protector in back....

...........................................per book / pamphlet 20 0.38 7.60 0.90 18.00 1.46 29.20 0.42 8.40 0.38

(e) Collate text color copies or text on colored stock

with balance of text ........................ ....per 100 sets 11 7.00 77.00 9.00 99.00 9.42 103.62 7.00 77.00 7.00

(f) Collate into sets, including, as ordered, slip sheeting

between sets or stitching with one or two stitching,

and drilling .......................................per 100 sets 124 2.00 248.00 10.00 1,240.00 4.37 541.88 2.25 279.00 2.00

(g) Collate into sets, punch and comb bind, per 100 sets 1 125.00 125.00 250.00 250.00 129.42 129.42 80.00 80.00 125.00

(h) Collate into sets and tape bind ............ per 100 sets 1 85.00 85.00 275.00 275.00 204.00 204.00 80.00 80.00 85.00

(i) Shrink film wrap ................................... per wrap 12,308 0.19 2,338.52 0.15 1,846.20 0.20 2,461.60 0.20 2,461.60 0.18

TOTAL OFFER: $50,847.62 $64,037.70 $50,363.90 $52,300.50

DISCOUNT: 2.00% $1,016.95 0.50% $320.19 0.25% $125.91 2.00% $1,046.01

NET OFFER: $49,830.67 $63,717.51 $50,237.99 $51,254.49

Warner Printing Co 

Chicago, IL

Production Press 

Jacksonville, IL

Alpha Graphics 

Schaumburg 

Schaumburg, IL 

Spot Printing 

ITEM DESCRIPTION Oakbrook Terrace, IL 

BASIS 

OF 

AWARD

Previous 

Graphic 

Scha 

Program 1502-S Contract Term: January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 plus four optio 

TITLE: Copying, Color and Black only General Usage, Federal Printing Region 5-1

Award
Prepared by: TF

Reviewed by: GC Page 2 of 2

COST

45,640.00

1,349.00

0.00

948.00

600.00

7.60

77.00

248.00

125.00

85.00

2,215.44

$51,295.04

$51,295.04

s Contract Alpha 

cs Schaumburg 

aumburg, IL 

on years
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

ELIZABETH A. BROW 

BY: 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

VINCENT T. SCHETTLER, AN 

INDIVIDUAL, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

PACIFIC WESTERN BANK, A 

CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, 

Res s ondent. 

FEB 1 6 2022 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERK OF S PREME CO

,

L

I

TE 

By . 

DEPUTY CLERK 

ED 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, 

this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney 

fees. NRAP 42(b). 

It is so ORDERED. 

cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge 

Persi J. Mishel, Settlement Judge 

Solomon Dwiggins & Freer, Ltd. 

Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg 

Black & Wadhams 

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

11,t) 1947 c4fer. );_o 5.207
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                         148,285
<SECURITIES>                                   939,576
<RECEIVABLES>                                  802,399
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     77,868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,090,908
<PP&E>                                      10,576,535
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,675,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,947,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          910,321
<BONDS>                                      1,047,964
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,810,624
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,178,709
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,947,618
<SALES>                                      1,419,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,465,706
<CGS>                                          830,962
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,116,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               704,710
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (395,055)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       112
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (395,167)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (395,167)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,978
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,688
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    180,022
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        424,750
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 643,560
<DEPOSITS>                                     386,321
<SHORT-TERM>                                    93,886
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,828
<LONG-TERM>                                    116,674
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 643,560
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 36,314
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,281
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   299
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                43,894
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,559
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,451
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           19,443
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   (1,579)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 617
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 13,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,839
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,852
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.11
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,257
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,668
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      272
<RECOVERIES>                                        64
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,668
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Extension of Experimental Use Permit (EPA Reg. No. 524

- EUP

- 104) for MON 87411 and other registered events expressed in single event and

various combined event corn lines

FROM: Shannon Borges, Lead Biologist

Microbial Pesticides Branch Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, 7511P

TO: Shanaz Bacchus, Regulatory Action Leader

Microbial Pesticides Branch Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, 7511P

Monsanto Company has applied for an extension to an Experimental Use Permit (EUP) involving MON 87411, which expresses Dv49 double stranded RNA (dsRNA) in addition to a

modified Bacillus thuringiensis ( Bt ) Cry 3Bb1 p rotein. For the original EUP application, EPA

concluded th at adverse effects to nontarget organisms are not expected based on the relatively low acreage on which MON 87411 plants would be planted, i solation methods employed to limit pollen movement, control and monitoring methods that would limit escape of corn p lants from experimental f ields, and restrictions from planting within 1⁄4 mile from known Federally listed

thre atened and endangered species locations (supported by proximity analyses provided to EPA prior to planting) 1

.

The extension of this EUP involves an increase in acreage planted with corn expressing the Dv49 dsRNA from approximately 7,600 acres to approximately 19,300 acres, and expands the number

of states involved in the EUP. While this amounts to a 2.5 X increas e in acreage planted with Dv49 dsRNA, the acreage is relatively low, and is very small in many states 2

. K nowledge gaps exist with respect to potential nontarget effects of pesticidal uses of dsRNA, and hazard to nontarget organisms cannot be precluded. How ever, in light of similar controls in place for the amended EUP, conclusions about nontarget risk made previously for the original EUP also apply. Additional data will be needed to support a FIFRA Sectio n 3 registration for Dv49 dsRNA

and MON 87411.

1 Memorand um from S. Borges to S. Bacchus, Subject: Environmental Risk Assessment for a FIFRA Section 5 Experimental Use Permit for MON 87410 and MON 87411 and other registered event s expressed in single event

and various combined event corn lines ( EPA File Symbol 524

- EUP

- RNU) , dated February 27, 2013.

2 Memorandum from K. Martin to S. Bacchus, Subject: Amendment to EPA Reg. No. 524

- EUP

- 104 (MON 87411

Combined Trait Insect Control for Corn) Section G Calculations, dated February 7, 2014.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 774

To temporarily suspend the duty on certain lead fuel test assemblies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1993

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (for herself and Mrs. KENNELLY) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To temporarily suspend the duty on certain lead fuel test

assemblies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN LEAD FUEL TEST ASSEMBLIES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of

5 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other pro6 vision of law, the Secretary of the Treasury shall—

7 (1) liquidate or reliquidate as free of duty any

8 entry of any partially assembled lead fuel assembly

9 (described in subsection (b)) made—

10 (A) on March 9, 1990 (Entry No. 110–

11 0675952–3),
2

HR 774 IH

1 (B) on September 19, 1990 (Entry No.

2 110–1525996–0),

3 (C) on November 7, 1990 (Entry No. 110–

4 3667810–7), and

5 (D) on December 21, 1990 (Entry No.

6 110–1526938–1), and

7 (2) refund any duties paid with respect to such

8 entry, if certification is given that such entry will be

9 reexported or destroyed within eight years of entry

10 and such certification is submitted to the appro11 priate customs officer within sixty days after the

12 date of the enactment of this Act.

13 (b) PARTIALLY ASSEMBLED LEAD FUEL ASSEM14 BLY.—A partially assembled lead fuel assembly is de15 scribed in this subsection if it consists of not more than

16 4 partially assembled fuel bundles, composed of nuclear

17 fuel rods of zircaloy tubes filled with slightly enriched ura18 nium dioxide (UO2) pellets, arranged into bundles of 96

19 rods, including a channel and upper handles and lower tie

20 plates.

Æ
----

| (1) | the accompanying Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Company Name |                                                                     |
|--------|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |         |                                                                     |   |
|   |         | /s/  Michael P. Rama                                           |   |
|   |         | Michael P. Rama                                                          |   |
|   |         | Controller, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |   |

----
#### The FIRST INDEPENDENT BAPTIST CHURCH OF ARAB and Dwight Bailey v. Fred SOUTHERLAND.

Civ. 1512.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 19, 1978.

William D. Jetton, of Jetton & Ogden, Guntersville, for appellants.

Clyde D. Baker, Guntersville, for appel-lee.

HOLMES, Judge.

The plaintiff sued the defendants for work and labor performed and on an account. The jury returned a verdict for $6,000 in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants. A judgment was entered thereon and the defendants appeal.

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the jury rendered a compromise verdict so as to require reversal. We find no error requiring reversal and affirm.

The record reveals that the plaintiff’s testimony as to the amount of money owed was to the effect that the defendant-church owed the plaintiff the sum of either $7,000 plus or $8,000 plus. The defendants did not contradict these amounts. The defendant-church’s sole defense to the lawsuit was the work and materials furnished by the plaintiff to the defendant-church were gifts and/or donations.

On appeal, as indicated above, the defendant-church contends through able counsel that since the amount of the jury verdict does not correspond to the testimony, such verdict is therefore a compromise verdict requiring reversal.

Suffice it to say that our review of the record reveals some conflict as to exactly what services or materials were performed or furnished for remuneration and what services or materials performed or furnished were in fact a donation to the church. This evidence is not a paragon of clarity nor is it overwhelming, but it does exist. Therefore, the exact amount due is not specifically known. Put another way, the jury could have found that $7,000 to $8,000 worth of work or material was furnished, but some of those items were donations or gifts.

Additionally, we find the following in the trial court’s charge to the jury:

> “Of course, it’s entirely possible that the plaintiff might establish a case as to some of the services or some of the property and not as to others. That would be for you to decide. . . . It’d be possible to decide that the plaintiff was entitled to recover for certain things and not for certain other things.”

There was no objection to this portion of the trial court’s charge.

With the above in mind, we cannot say that á compromise verdict was reached by *1038the jury so as to require reversal. See *Williams v. Williamson Truck Lines, Inc.,*Ala.Civ.App., 353 So.2d 1172 (1978); *Vester J. Thompson, Jr., Inc.*v. *Shelton,*277 Ala. 148, 167 So.2d 715 (1964); 2A Ala.Digest *Appeal & Error*&wkey;999(1).

In view of the above, the trial court is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

WRIGHT, P. J., and BRADLEY, J., concur.
259 La. 721

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Thomas DAIGLE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51742.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1971.

In re: Thomas Daigle applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus, prohibition and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amendment to the Quarterly Report of Metromedia International Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the
period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated
this 24th day of February 2004.

| | METROMEDIA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.                                                      
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /S/  MARK S. HAUFMark S. Hauf President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 16, 2018.

                    A.                     *Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis*                     (Mark A. Rauzi, Vice President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:                

                    1.                     *Border Bancshares, Inc., Greenbush, Minnesota;*                     to acquire Union Bancshares, Inc., Fargo, North Dakota, and thereby indirectly acquire Union State Bank of Fargo, Fargo, North Dakota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 20, 2018.

Ann Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-13553 Filed 6-22-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Eleanor R. RODGERS, Appellant, v. Edward E. RODGERS, Appellee.

No. 71-69.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 13, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 18, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.