*HomeU.S. Government Accountability Office*
Menu

      close


          
          
                          	
				
				
	
	
					Reports & Testimonies
									
																				
				
				
	
	
								Reports & Testimonies
													
																												
																						
							
																Recommendations Database
							
																												
																						
							
																Month in Review
							
																												
																						
							
																Order Copies
							
																												
																						
							
																Restricted Reports
							
																												
																						
							
																View Topics
							
																												
																						
							
																View Agencies
							
																												
																						
							
																Bid Protests & Appropriations Law
									
																				
				
				
	
	
								Bid Protests & Appropriations Law
													
																												
																						
							
																Bid Protests
							
																												
																						
							
																Appropriations Law
							
																												
																						
							
																Federal Vacancies Reform Act
							
																												
																						
							
																Other Legal
							
																												
																						
							
																About
									
																				
				
				
	
	
								About
													
																												
																						
							
																What GAO Does
							
																												
																						
							
																U.S. Comptroller General
							
																												
																						
							
																Careers
							
																												
																						
							
																Contact UsFor Congress
                                
                          
        
                Press Center
                                
                          
        
                Careers
                                
                          
        
                BlogSearch Breadcrumb
        Home
                            Reports & Testimonies
                            Environmental Protection Agency: Asbestos Part 1; Chrysotile Asbestos; Regulation of Certain Conditions of Use Under The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
    Environmental Protection Agency: Asbestos Part 1; Chrysotile Asbestos; Regulation of Certain Conditions of Use Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) **B-336187**
        Apr 12, 2024Jump To:
    Jump ToElder Abuse
          Services for Older Adults
          State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends
          State and Local Fiscal Projections
          Federal Borrowing
          Managing the Debt
          Summary of Funding Provisions
          Auditing the Government's Books
          Unpacking the Financial Report
          Highlights
          Recommendations
          Background
          About This Work
          About This Work
          Trends
          About the Center
          Why It's High Risk
          What Remains To Be Done
          Key Reports
          Newest COVID-Related Reports
          AI Use Cases
          Flood Insurance
          Past Pandemic-Related Reports
          CARES Act Oversight Reports
          All COVID-19 Reports
          Report Suspected Fraud
          Subjects
          How to Get Notified
          Past Reports
          Public Health Threats
          Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds
          Lessons Learned
          Agency Reports
          Recent Reports
          Recommendations
          Supplemental Material
          Full Report
          Additional Data
          View Decision
          Downloads
          Previously Identified Actions
          Related Pages
          Associated Agencies
          Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead
          Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas
          Retirement Security Key Areas
          Current List
          About The High Risk List
          Area Ratings
          Previous High Risk Products
          Search Federal Vacancies
          Past Federal Vacancies
          Violation Letters
          About the Yellow Book
          Advisory Council
          Related Resources
          Comment Letters
          Related Publications
          Contacts and Resources
          Major Issues Facing the Nation
          Meeting Strategic Challenges
          Additional Resources
          Resources
          GAO Contacts
          Mission Teams
          Operations and Staff Offices
          Organization Chart
          Why a Career at GAO?
          Am I Qualified?
          Company Culture
          Reasonable Accommodations
          Video Gallery
          Paid Internships
          Student Volunteers
          Professional Development Program
          Advancement
          Executive Candidate Program
          Summer Associates
          Externships
          Benefits
          Contacts
                    Skip to Highlights
Highlights
  GAO reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) new rule entitled "Asbestos Part 1; Chrysotile Asbestos; Regulation of Certain Conditions of Use Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)." GAO found that the final rule is issued under the Toxic Substances Control Act, Pub. L. No. 94-469, 90 Stat. 2003 (Oct. 11, 1976), and addresses, to the extent necessary, the unreasonable risk of injury to health presented by chrysotile asbestos based on the risks posed by certain conditions of use.

Enclosed is our assessment of EPA's compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. If you have any questions about this report or wish to contact GAO officials responsible for the evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule, please contact Shari Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-6398.

  View DecisionB-336187

April 12, 2024

The Honorable Thomas R. Carper
Chairman
The Honorable Shelley Moore Capito
Ranking Member
Committee on Environment and Public Works
United States Senate

The Honorable Cathy McMorris Rodgers
Chair
The Honorable Frank Pallone, Jr.
Ranking Member
Committee on Energy and Commerce
House of Representatives

Subject: *Environmental Protection Agency: Asbestos Part 1; Chrysotile Asbestos; Regulation of Certain Conditions of Use Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)*

Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) entitled “Asbestos Part 1; Chrysotile Asbestos; Regulation of Certain Conditions of Use Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)” (RIN: 2070-AK86). We received the rule on March 26, 2024. It was published in the *Federal Register* as a final rule on March 28, 2024. 89 Fed. Reg. 21970. The effective date is May 28, 2024.

The final rule, according to EPA, is issued under the Toxic Substances Control Act, Pub. L. No. 94-469, 90 Stat. 2003 (Oct. 11, 1976), and addresses, to the extent necessary, the unreasonable risk of injury to health presented by chrysotile asbestos based on the risks posed by certain conditions of use. EPA explained that the injuries to human health include mesothelioma and lung, ovarian, and laryngeal cancers resulting from chronic inhalation exposure to chrysotile asbestos.

Enclosed is our assessment of EPA’s compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. If you have any questions about this report or wish to contact GAO officials responsible for the evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule, please contact Shari Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-6398.

Shirley A. Jones
Managing Associate General Counsel

ENCLOSURE

REPORT UNDER 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(2)(A) ON A MAJOR RULE
ISSUED BY THE
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ENTITLED
“ASBESTOS PART 1; CHRYSOTILE ASBESTOS; REGULATION OF CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF USE UNDER THE TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)”
(RIN: 2070-AK86)

(i) Cost-benefit analysis

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) prepared an economic analysis of the potential incremental impacts associated with this final rule. Regarding costs, EPA stated that three firms own a total of eight chlor-alkali facilities in the United States that still use asbestos diaphragms to produce chlorine and sodium hydroxide. According to EPA, converting the facilities using asbestos diaphragm cells to non-asbestos technologies is predicted to require an investment of approximately $2.8 billion to $3.4 billion across all eight facilities. The incremental net effect of the rule, according to EPA, on the chlor-alkali industry over a 35-year period using a three percent discount rate is estimated to range from an annualized cost of $7 million per year to an annualized savings of $1 million per year, depending on whether the higher grade of caustic soda produced by membrane cells continues to command a premium price. EPA stated that, using a seven percent discount rate, the incremental annualized net effect is a cost ranging from $34 million to $43 million per year, again depending on whether there are revenue gains from the caustic soda production. Further, EPA noted that the rule is estimated to result in total annualized costs for aftermarket automotive brakes of approximately $300,000 per year using a three percent discount rate and $200,000 per year using a seven percent discount rate.

Regarding benefits, EPA stated it quantified the benefits from avoided cases of lung cancer, mesothelioma, ovarian cancer, and laryngeal cancer due to reduced asbestos exposures to workers, occupational non-users, and do-it-yourselfers related to the rule’s requirements for chlor-alkali diaphragms, aftermarket automotive brakes, and sheet gaskets used for titanium dioxide production. According to EPA, the combined national quantified benefits of avoided cancer cases associated with these products are approximately $6,000 per year using a three percent discount rate and $3,000 per year using a seven percent discount rate.

(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 603–605, 607, and 609

EPA certified that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA.

(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202–205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. §§ 1532–1535

EPA stated that this final rule contains a federal mandate under the Act that may result in expenditures of more than the inflation-adjusted threshold of $100 million or more for state, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector in any one year. EPA stated it prepared a written statement as required under the Act, which is included in the docket for the rule, and summarized the statement in the preamble of the rule.

(iv) Agency actions relevant to the Administrative Pay-As-You-Go-Act of 2023, Pub. L. No. 118-5, div. B, title III, 137 Stat 31 (June 3, 2023)

Section 270 of the Administrative Pay-As-You-Go-Act of 2023 amended 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(2)(A) to require GAO to assess agency compliance with the Act, which establishes requirements for administrative actions that affect direct spending, in GAO’s major rule reports. In guidance to Executive Branch agencies, issued on September 1, 2023, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) instructed that agencies should include a statement explaining that either: “the Act does not apply to this rule because it does not increase direct spending; the Act does not apply to this rule because it meets one of the Act’s exemptions (and specifying the relevant exemption); the OMB Director granted a waiver of the Act’s requirements pursuant to section 265(a)(1) or (2) of the Act; or the agency has submitted a notice or written opinion to the OMB Director as required by section 263(a) or (b) of the Act” in their submissions of rules to GAO under the Congressional Review Act. OMB, *Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies,* Subject: Guidance for Implementation of the Administrative Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2023, M-23-21 (Sept. 1, 2023), at 11–12. OMB also states that directives in the memorandum that supplement the requirements in the Act do not apply to proposed rules that have already been submitted to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, however agencies must comply with any applicable requirements of the Act before finalizing such rules.

EPA did not address the Act in the final rule or in its submission to us.

(v) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 *et seq.*

On April 12, 2022, EPA issued a proposed rule. 87 Fed. Reg. 21706. EPA received a total of 10,847 public comments, 158 of which were unique comments from trade organizations, industry stakeholders, environmental groups, and non-governmental health advocacy organizations, among others. EPA stated that a summary of comments and EPA’s responses is available in the docket for the rule.

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. §§ 3501–3520

EPA determined that this final rule contains information collection requirements (ICRs) subject to PRA and stated that the ICRs have been submitted to OMB for approval under OMB Control Number 2070-0220. EPA estimated a total annual burden of 2,269 hours associated with the ICRs, and a total annual cost of $370,973 which includes $233,425 annualized capital or operation and maintenance costs.

Statutory authorization for the rule

EPA promulgated this final rule pursuant to section 2605 and 2625(l)(4) of title 15, United States Code.

Executive Order No. 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review)

EPA stated that this final rule is a significant regulatory action as defined under the Order. Accordingly, EPA noted that it submitted the rule to OMB for review.

Executive Order No. 13132 (Federalism)

EPA stated that it concluded this final rule has federalism implications as specified in the

Order because regulations under section 6(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act, Pub. L.
No. 94-469, 90 Stat. 2003 (Oct. 11, 1976), may preempt state law. EPA stated it consulted with state and local officials early in the process to facilitate their input, invited officials to a meeting on May 13, 2021, and provided an opportunity to provide the agency with follow-up comments in writing. EPA noted it did not receive any such comments.

Downloads
    Full Report (4 pages)
GAO Contacts
    
      Shirley A. Jones
            
            Managing Associate General Counsel
      
            jonessa@gao.gov
      
            (202) 512-5400
Office of Public Affairs
    
      Chuck Young
            
            Managing Director
      
            youngc1@gao.gov
      
            (202) 512-4800
Related Pages
      RelatedAppropriations LawRelatedBid ProtestsRelatedDecisions & FAQsRelatedThe Red BookRelatedContract Appeals BoardRelatedFederal Vacancies Reform ActRelatedCongressional Review Act
 Receive GAO Updates
  Stay informed as we add new reports & testimonies.

    GAO Logo
      U.S. Government Accountability Office


                                   Column 1
                            Press Center
                              Contact Us
                              Inspector General
                              Restricted Reports
                              Column 2
                            Copyright & Terms of Use
                              Privacy Policy
                              Accessibility
                              Sitemap
                              Column 3
                            FOIA Requests
                              Scam Alerts
                              No FEAR Act Data
                              Health Care Advisory Committees