# Official Journal C 301/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.301.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 301 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 536 November 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.301.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 301

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 536 November 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2010/C 301/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 288, 23.10.2010 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2010/C 301/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 288, 23.10.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2010/C 301/02 | Case C-550/07 P P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 September 2010 — Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd, Akcros Chemicals Ltd v European Commission, Council of the Bars and Law Societies of the European Union, Algemene Raad van de Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten, Association européenne des juristes d'entreprise (AEJE), American Corporate Counsel Association (ACCA) — European Chapter, International Bar Association (Appeal — Competition — Measures of inquiry — Commission’s powers of investigation — Legal professional privilege — Employment relationship between a lawyer and an undertaking — Exchanges of e-mails) | 2 |
| 2010/C 301/03 | Case C-48/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 September 2010 — Lego Juris A/S v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Mega Brands Inc. (Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Community trade mark — Suitability of a shape of goods for registration as a trade mark — Registration of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the upper surface and two sides of a Lego brick — Declaration of invalidity of that registration on application by an undertaking marketing toy bricks having the same shape and dimensions — Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of that regulation — Sign which consists exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result) | 3 |
| 2010/C 301/04 | Case C-149/10: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Diikitiko Efetio Thessalonikis — Greece) — Zoi Chatzi v Ipourgos Ikonomikon (Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Interpretation of clause 2.1 of the framework agreement — Person granted the right to parental leave — Parental leave in the event of the birth of twins — Meaning of ‘birth’ — Taking account of the number of children born — Principle of equal treatment) | 3 |
| 2010/C 301/05 | Case C-337/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 7 July 2010 — Georg Neidel v Stadt Frankfurt am Main | 4 |
| 2010/C 301/06 | Case C-362/10: Action brought on 20 July 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland | 4 |
| 2010/C 301/07 | Case C-364/10: Action brought on 8 July 2010 — Republic of Hungary v Slovak Republic | 5 |
| 2010/C 301/08 | Case C-379/10: Action brought on 29 July 2010 — Commission v Italian Republic | 6 |
| 2010/C 301/09 | Case C-388/10 P: Appeal brought on 2 August 2010 by Félix Muñoz Arraiza against the judgment delivered on 9 June 2010 by the General Court (Fifth Chamber) in Case T-138/09 Félix Muñoz Arraiza v OHIM and Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Calificada Rioja | 7 |
| 2010/C 301/10 | Case C-397/10: Action brought on 4 August 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium | 8 |
| 2010/C 301/11 | Case C-403/10 P: Appeal brought on 6 August 2010 by Mediaset SpA against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 15 June 2010 in Case T-177/07: Mediaset SpA v European Commission, supported by Sky Italia Srl | 8 |
| 2010/C 301/12 | Case C-412/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division) (United Kingdom) made on 18 August 2010 — Deo Antoine Homawoo v GMF Assurances SA | 9 |
| 2010/C 301/13 | Case C-414/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 19 August 2010 — Société Veleclair v Ministre du budget, des comptes publics et de la réforme de l’État | 10 |
| 2010/C 301/14 | Case C-415/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 20 August 2010 — Galina Meister v Speech Design Carrier Systems GmbH | 10 |
| 2010/C 301/15 | Case C-416/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovak Republic) lodged on 23 August 2010 — Jozef Križan and Others v Slovenská inšpekcia životného prostredia | 11 |
| 2010/C 301/16 | Case C-419/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischen Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 23 August 2010 — Wolfgang Hofmann v Freistaat Bayern | 12 |
| 2010/C 301/17 | Case C-422/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 27 August 2010 — Georgetown University, University of Rochester, Loyola University of Chicago v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks | 12 |
| 2010/C 301/18 | Case C-424/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 31 August 2010 — Tomasz Ziolkowski v Land Berlin | 13 |
| 2010/C 301/19 | Case C-425/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 31 August 2010 — Barbara Szeja, Maria-Magdalena Szeja, Marlon Szeja v Land Berlin | 13 |
| 2010/C 301/20 | Case C-429/10 P: Appeal brought on 2 September 2010 by X Technology Swiss GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (SecondChamber) delivered on 15 June 2010 in Case T-547/08 X Technology Swiss GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | 13 |
| 2010/C 301/21 | Case C-430/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 2 September 2010 — Hristo Gaydarov v Direktor na Glavna direktsia‘Ohranitelna politsia’ pri Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti | 14 |
| 2010/C 301/22 | Case C-431/10: Action brought on 1 September 2010 — European Commission v Ireland | 15 |
| 2010/C 301/23 | Case C-432/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 26 August 2010 — Ministerie van Financiën and Openbaar Ministerie v Aboulkacem Chihabi and Others | 15 |
| 2010/C 301/24 | Case C-433/10 P: Appeal brought on 3 September 2010 by Volker Mauerhofer against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 29 June 2010 in Case T-515/08: Volker Mauerhofer v European Commission | 17 |
| 2010/C 301/25 | Case C-445/10: Action brought on 15 September 2010 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany | 17 |
| 2010/C 301/26 | Case C-447/10 P: Appeal brought on 15 September 2010 by Grain Millers, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 9 July 2010 in Case T-430/08: Grain Millers, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Grain Millers GmbH & Co. KG | 18 |
| 2010/C 301/27 | Case C-457/10 P: Appeal brought on 16 September 2010 by AstraZeneca AB, AstraZeneca plc against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 1 July 2010 in Case T-321/05: AstraZeneca AB, AstraZeneca plc v European Commission | 18 |
| 2010/C 301/28 | Case C-366/09: Order of the President of the Court of 3 September 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic | 19 |
| | General Court |
| 2010/C 301/29 | Case T-279/04: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2010 — Éditions Jacob v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — French-language publishing — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market subject to sale of assets — Action for annulment brought by an unsuccessful prospective purchaser — Obligation to state reasons — Fraud — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89) | 20 |
| 2010/C 301/30 | Case T-452/04: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2010 — Éditions Jacob v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — French-language publishing — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market subject to sale of assets — Decision to approve the purchaser of the assets sold — Action for annulment brought by an unsuccessful prospective purchaser — Trustee’s independence — Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89) | 20 |
| 2010/C 301/31 | Joined Cases T-415/05, T-416/05 and T-423/05: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Greece and Others v Commission (State aid — Aviation Sector — Aid linked to the restructuring and privatisation of the Greek national airline — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and requiring its recovery — Financial continuity between two companies — Identification of the effective recipient of aid for the purposes of its recovery — Criterion of the private operator — Compatibility of the aid with the common market — Obligation to state reasons for the decision) | 21 |
| 2010/C 301/32 | Case T-26/06: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Trioplast Wittenheim v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for industrial plastic sacks — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of the infringement — Fines — Seriousness of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Proportionality) | 21 |
| 2010/C 301/33 | Case T-40/06: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Trioplast Industrier v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for industrial plastic sacks — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of the infringement — Fines — Seriousness of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Proportionality — Joint and several liability — Principal of legal certainty) | 22 |
| 2010/C 301/34 | Case T-193/06: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — TF1 v European Commission (State aid — Aid schemes for cinematographic and audiovisual production — Decision not to raise objections — Actions for annulment — Absence of any significant effect on the competitive position — Inadmissibility) | 22 |
| 2010/C 301/35 | Case T-314/06: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Whirlpool Europe v Council (Dumping — Imports of certain combined refrigerator-freezers originating in South Korea — Definition of the product concerned — Rights of the defence — Advisory Committee — Duty to state reasons — Choice of the method used to define the product concerned — Article 15(2) and Article 20(5) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 15(2) and Article 20(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009)) | 23 |
| 2010/C 301/36 | Case T-131/07: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Mohr & Sohn v Commission (Inland waterway transport — Community-fleet capacity — Conditions for putting new vessels into service (‘old for new’ rule) — Commission decision not to grant the specialised vessels exemption — Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 718/1999) | 23 |
| 2010/C 301/37 | Joined Cases T-156/07 and 232/07: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Spain v Commission (Rules on the use of languages — Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of administrators — Publication in all the official languages — Amendments — Regulation No 1 — Articles 27, 28 and Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations — Article 1(1) and (2) of Annex III to the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of non-discrimination) | 24 |
| 2010/C 301/38 | Joined Cases T-166/07 and T-285/07: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Italy v Commission (Rules on the use of languages — Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of administrators and assistants — Publication in three official languages — Amendments — Publication in all the official languages — Choice of the second language from three languages — Regulation No 1 — Articles 27, 28 and 29(1) of the Staff Regulations — Article 1(1) and (2) of Annex III to the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of non-discrimination — Misuse of power) | 24 |
| 2010/C 301/39 | Case T-366/07: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Procter & Gamble v OHIM — Prestige Cosmetics (P&G PRESTIGE BEAUTE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark P&G PRESTIGE BEAUTE — Earlier national figurative marks Prestige — Partial refusal to register — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 25 |
| 2010/C 301/40 | Case T-72/08: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Travel Service v OHIM — Eurowings Luftverkehrs (smartWings) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark smartWings — Earlier national and international word and figurative marks EUROWINGS and EuroWings — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) — Article 79 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 83 of Regulation No 207/2009)) | 25 |
| 2010/C 301/41 | Case T-97/08: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — KUKA Roboter v OHIM (Shade of orange) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a shade of orange — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 26 |
| 2010/C 301/42 | Case T-135/08: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Schniga v CPVO — Elaris and Brookfield New Zealand (Gala Schnitzer) (Plant varieties — Application for a Community plant variety right for the Gala Schnitzer apple variety — Technical examination — Discretion of the CPVO — Objections — Article 55(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94) | 26 |
| 2010/C 301/43 | Case T-149/08: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Abbott Laboratories v OHIM — aRigen (Sorvir) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Sorvir — Earlier Community word mark NORVIR — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)) | 26 |
| 2010/C 301/44 | Case T-292/08: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Inditex v OHIM — Marín Díaz de Cerio (OFTEN) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark OFTEN — Earlier national word mark OLTEN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009) — Subject-matter of the dispute before the Board of Appeal — Articles 61 and 62 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Articles 63 and 64 of Regulation No 207/2009)) | 27 |
| 2010/C 301/45 | Case T-400/08: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Enercon v OHIM — BP (ENERCON) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ENERCON — Earlier Community word mark ENERGOL — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Partial refusal to register) | 27 |
| 2010/C 301/46 | Case T-546/08: Judgment of the General Court of 21 September 2010 — Villa Almè v OHIM — Marqués de Murrieta (i GAI) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark iGAI — National word mark YGAY and Community figurative and word marks MARQUÉS DE MURRIETA YGAY — Relative grounds for refusal — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009)) | 28 |
| 2010/C 301/47 | Case T-385/05 TO: Order of the General Court of 6 September 2010 — Portuguese Republic v Transnáutica and Commission (Third-party proceedings — Opportunity for the third party to take part in the original case — No prejudicial effects on the rights of the third party — Inadmissibility) | 28 |
| 2010/C 301/48 | Case T-123/08: Order of the General Court of 2 September 2010 — Spitzer v OHIM — Homeland Housewares (Magic Butler) (Action for annulment — Applicant's failure to act — No need to adjudicate) | 29 |
| 2010/C 301/49 | Case T-532/08: Order of the General Court of 7 September 2010 — Norilsk Nickel Harjavalta and Umicore v Commission (Actions for annulment — Environment and protection of human health — Classification, packaging and labelling of certain nickel carbonate compounds as dangerous substances — Directive 2008/58/EC — Directive 67/548/EEC — Regulation (EC) No 790/2009 — Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 — Amendment of form of order sought — Temporal application of the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — No individual concern — Inadmissibility) | 29 |
| 2010/C 301/50 | Case T-539/08: Order of the General Court of 7 September 2010 — Etimine and Etiproducts v Commission (Actions for annulment — Environment and protection of human health — Classification, packaging and labelling of certain borates as dangerous substances — Directive 2008/58/EC — Directive 67/548/EEC — Regulation (EC) No 790/2009 — Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 — Amendment of form of order sought — Temporal application of the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — No individual concern — Inadmissibility) | 30 |
| 2010/C 301/51 | Case T-120/09: Order of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Phoenix-Reisen and DRV v Commission (State aid — Subsidy provided for by German law for insolvent companies — Complaint for alleged breach of Community law — Rejection of the complaint — Adoption of a later decision — No need to adjudicate) | 30 |
| 2010/C 301/52 | Case T-157/09 P: Order of the General Court of 15 September 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Reasonable time for the submission of a claim for compensation — Lateness — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded) | 31 |
| 2010/C 301/53 | Case T-299/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 31 August 2010 — Babcock Noell v The European joint undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Application for interim measures — Public contracts — Tendering procedure — Rejection of a tender — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Prima facie case — Urgency — Balance of interests) | 31 |
| 2010/C 301/54 | Case T-332/10: Action brought on 10 August 2010 — Viaguara v OHIM — Pfizer (VIAGUARA) | 31 |
| 2010/C 301/55 | Case T-341/10: Action brought on 20 August 2010 — F91 Diddeléng and Others v Commission | 32 |
| 2010/C 301/56 | Case T-345/10: Action brought on 25 August 2010 — Portuguese Republic v Commission | 32 |
| 2010/C 301/57 | Case T-361/10 P: Appeal brought on 25 August 2010 by the European Commission against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 15 June 2010 in Case F-35/08 Pachtitis v Commission | 33 |
| 2010/C 301/58 | Case T-367/10: Action brought on 3 September 2010 — Bloufin Touna Ellas Naftiki Etaireia e.a. v Commission | 34 |
| 2010/C 301/59 | Case T-369/10: Action brought on 2 September 2010 — Handicare v OHIM — Apple Corps (BEATLE) | 35 |
| 2010/C 301/60 | Case T-372/10: Action brought on 3 September 2010 — Bolloré v Commission | 35 |
| 2010/C 301/61 | Case T-373/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Villeroy & Boch Austria v Commission | 36 |
| 2010/C 301/62 | Case T-374/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Villeroy & Boch v Commission | 37 |
| 2010/C 301/63 | Case T-375/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Hansa Metallwerke and Others v Commission | 38 |
| 2010/C 301/64 | Case T-377/10: Action brought on 6 September 2010 — Preparados Alimenticios v OHIM — Rila Feinkost-Importe (Jambo Afrika) | 39 |
| 2010/C 301/65 | Case T-378/10: Action brought on 7 September 2010 — Masco and Others v Commission | 40 |
| 2010/C 301/66 | Case T-379/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Keramag Keramische Werke a.o. v Commission | 40 |
| 2010/C 301/67 | Case T-381/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Sanitec Europe v Commission | 41 |
| 2010/C 301/68 | Case T-382/10: Action brought on 9 September 2010 — Villeroy & Boch v Commission | 42 |
| 2010/C 301/69 | Case T-383/10: Action brought on 7 September 2010 — Continental Bulldog Club Deutschland v OHIM | 43 |
| 2010/C 301/70 | Case T-385/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — ArcelorMittal Wire France and Others v Commission | 43 |
| 2010/C 301/71 | Case T-386/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Dornbracht v Commission | 44 |
| 2010/C 301/72 | Case T-387/10: Action brought on 9 September 2010 — Goutier v OHIM — Eurodata (ARANTAX) | 45 |
| 2010/C 301/73 | Case T-388/10: Action brought on 6 September 2010 — Productos Derivados de Acero v Commission | 46 |
| 2010/C 301/74 | Case T-389/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — SLM v Commission | 46 |
| 2010/C 301/75 | Case T-390/10 P: Appeal brought on 10 September 2010 by Paulette Füller-Tomlinson against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 1 July 2010 in Case F-97/08, Füller-Tomlinson v Parliament | 47 |
| 2010/C 301/76 | Case T-391/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — Nedri Spanstaal v Commission | 48 |
| 2010/C 301/77 | Case T-392/10: Action brought on 6 September 2010 — Euro-Information v OHIM (EURO AUTOMATIC CASH) | 48 |
| 2010/C 301/78 | Case T-393/10: Action brought on 14 September 2010 — Westfälische Drahtindustrie and Others v Commission | 49 |
| 2010/C 301/79 | Case T-394/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — Grebenshikova v OHIM — Volvo Trademark (SOLVO) | 50 |
| 2010/C 301/80 | Case T-395/10: Action brought on 14 September 2010 — Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory v Commission | 50 |
| 2010/C 301/81 | Case T-396/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Zucchetti Rubinetteria v Commission | 51 |
| 2010/C 301/82 | Case T-397/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — ara v OHIM — Allrounder (Representation of a sports shoe bearing the letter A on the side) | 51 |
| 2010/C 301/83 | Case T-398/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Fapricela — Indústria de Trefilaria v Commission. | 52 |
| 2010/C 301/84 | Case T-399/10: Action brought on 14 September 2010 — ArcelorMittal España v Commission | 53 |
| 2010/C 301/85 | Case T-402/10: Action brought on 9 September 2010 — Villeroy & Boch — Belgium v Commission | 53 |
| 2010/C 301/86 | Case T-405/10: Action brought on 10 September 2010 — Justice & Environment v Commission | 54 |
| 2010/C 301/87 | Case T-406/10: Action brought on 15 September 2010 — Emesa-Trefilería and Industrias Galyca v Commission | 55 |
| 2010/C 301/88 | Case T-408/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Roca Sanitario v Commission | 55 |
| 2010/C 301/89 | Case T-409/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — Bottega Veneta International v OHIM (Shape of a handbag) | 56 |
| 2010/C 301/90 | Case T-410/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — Bottega Veneta International v OHIM (Shape of a handbag) | 56 |
| 2010/C 301/91 | Case T-411/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Laufen Austria v Commission | 57 |
| 2010/C 301/92 | Case T-412/10: Action brought on 9 September 2010 — Roca v Commission | 57 |
| 2010/C 301/93 | Case T-415/10: Action brought on 18 September 2010 — Nexans France v Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy | 58 |
| 2010/C 301/94 | Case T-417/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — Cortés del Valle López v OHIM (HIJOPUTA) | 59 |
| 2010/C 301/95 | Case T-418/10: Action brought on 15 September 2010 — voestalpine and voestalpine Austria Draht v Commission | 59 |
| 2010/C 301/96 | Case T-419/10: Action brought on 14 September 2010 — Ori Martin v Commission | 60 |
| 2010/C 301/97 | Case T-420/10: Action brought on 17 September 2010 — Armani v OHIM — Annunziata del Prete (AJ AMICI JUNIOR) | 61 |
| 2010/C 301/98 | Case T-421/10: Action brought on 20 September 2010 — Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana v OHIM — Constantina Sotelo Ares (ROSALIA DE CASTRO) | 61 |
| 2010/C 301/99 | Case T-429/10: Action brought on 17 September 2010 — Global Steel Wire v Commission | 62 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2010/C 301/00 | Case F-61/10: Action brought on 24 July 2010 — AF v Commission | 63 |
| 2010/C 301/01 | Case F-73/10: Action brought on 3 September 2010 — Coedo Suárez v Council | 63 |
| 2010/C 301/02 | Case F-74/10: Action brought on 9 September 2010 — Kimman v Commission | 63 |
| 2010/C 301/03 | Case F-75/10: Action brought on 10 September 2010 — Scheefer v Parliament | 64 |
| 2010/C 301/04 | Case F-76/10: Action brought on 10 September 2010 — Colart and Others v Parliament | 64 |
| 2010/C 301/05 | Case F-77/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — Arroyo Redondo v Commission | 65 |
| 2010/C 301/06 | Case F-78/10: Action brought on 18 September 2010 — Antelo Sanchez and Others v Parliament | 65 |
| 2010/C 301/07 | Case F-79/10: Action brought on 17 September 2010 — Dubus v Commission | 66 |
| 2010/C 301/08 | Case F-81/10: Action brought on 24 September 2010 — Praskevicius v Parliament | 66 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2010/C 301/02

Case C-550/07 P P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 September 2010 — Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd, Akcros Chemicals Ltd v European Commission, Council of the Bars and Law Societies of the European Union, Algemene Raad van de Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten, Association européenne des juristes d'entreprise (AEJE), American Corporate Counsel Association (ACCA) — European Chapter, International Bar Association (Appeal — Competition — Measures of inquiry — Commission’s powers of investigation — Legal professional privilege — Employment relationship between a lawyer and an undertaking — Exchanges of e-mails)

2

2010/C 301/03

Case C-48/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 September 2010 — Lego Juris A/S v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Mega Brands Inc. (Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Community trade mark — Suitability of a shape of goods for registration as a trade mark — Registration of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the upper surface and two sides of a Lego brick — Declaration of invalidity of that registration on application by an undertaking marketing toy bricks having the same shape and dimensions — Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of that regulation — Sign which consists exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result)

3

2010/C 301/04

Case C-149/10: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Diikitiko Efetio Thessalonikis — Greece) — Zoi Chatzi v Ipourgos Ikonomikon (Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Interpretation of clause 2.1 of the framework agreement — Person granted the right to parental leave — Parental leave in the event of the birth of twins — Meaning of ‘birth’ — Taking account of the number of children born — Principle of equal treatment)

3

2010/C 301/05

Case C-337/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 7 July 2010 — Georg Neidel v Stadt Frankfurt am Main

4

2010/C 301/06

Case C-362/10: Action brought on 20 July 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

4

2010/C 301/07

Case C-364/10: Action brought on 8 July 2010 — Republic of Hungary v Slovak Republic

5

2010/C 301/08

Case C-379/10: Action brought on 29 July 2010 — Commission v Italian Republic

6

2010/C 301/09

Case C-388/10 P: Appeal brought on 2 August 2010 by Félix Muñoz Arraiza against the judgment delivered on 9 June 2010 by the General Court (Fifth Chamber) in Case T-138/09 Félix Muñoz Arraiza v OHIM and Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Calificada Rioja

7

2010/C 301/10

Case C-397/10: Action brought on 4 August 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

8

2010/C 301/11

Case C-403/10 P: Appeal brought on 6 August 2010 by Mediaset SpA against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 15 June 2010 in Case T-177/07: Mediaset SpA v European Commission, supported by Sky Italia Srl

8

2010/C 301/12

Case C-412/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division) (United Kingdom) made on 18 August 2010 — Deo Antoine Homawoo v GMF Assurances SA

9

2010/C 301/13

Case C-414/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 19 August 2010 — Société Veleclair v Ministre du budget, des comptes publics et de la réforme de l’État

10

2010/C 301/14

Case C-415/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 20 August 2010 — Galina Meister v Speech Design Carrier Systems GmbH

10

2010/C 301/15

Case C-416/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovak Republic) lodged on 23 August 2010 — Jozef Križan and Others v Slovenská inšpekcia životného prostredia

11

2010/C 301/16

Case C-419/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischen Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 23 August 2010 — Wolfgang Hofmann v Freistaat Bayern

12

2010/C 301/17

Case C-422/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 27 August 2010 — Georgetown University, University of Rochester, Loyola University of Chicago v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks

12

2010/C 301/18

Case C-424/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 31 August 2010 — Tomasz Ziolkowski v Land Berlin

13

2010/C 301/19

Case C-425/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 31 August 2010 — Barbara Szeja, Maria-Magdalena Szeja, Marlon Szeja v Land Berlin

13

2010/C 301/20

Case C-429/10 P: Appeal brought on 2 September 2010 by X Technology Swiss GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (SecondChamber) delivered on 15 June 2010 in Case T-547/08 X Technology Swiss GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

13

2010/C 301/21

Case C-430/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 2 September 2010 — Hristo Gaydarov v Direktor na Glavna direktsia‘Ohranitelna politsia’ pri Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti

14

2010/C 301/22

Case C-431/10: Action brought on 1 September 2010 — European Commission v Ireland

15

2010/C 301/23

Case C-432/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 26 August 2010 — Ministerie van Financiën and Openbaar Ministerie v Aboulkacem Chihabi and Others

15

2010/C 301/24

Case C-433/10 P: Appeal brought on 3 September 2010 by Volker Mauerhofer against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 29 June 2010 in Case T-515/08: Volker Mauerhofer v European Commission

17

2010/C 301/25

Case C-445/10: Action brought on 15 September 2010 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany

17

2010/C 301/26

Case C-447/10 P: Appeal brought on 15 September 2010 by Grain Millers, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 9 July 2010 in Case T-430/08: Grain Millers, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Grain Millers GmbH & Co. KG

18

2010/C 301/27

Case C-457/10 P: Appeal brought on 16 September 2010 by AstraZeneca AB, AstraZeneca plc against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 1 July 2010 in Case T-321/05: AstraZeneca AB, AstraZeneca plc v European Commission

18

2010/C 301/28

Case C-366/09: Order of the President of the Court of 3 September 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic

19

General Court

2010/C 301/29

Case T-279/04: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2010 — Éditions Jacob v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — French-language publishing — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market subject to sale of assets — Action for annulment brought by an unsuccessful prospective purchaser — Obligation to state reasons — Fraud — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89)

20

2010/C 301/30

Case T-452/04: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2010 — Éditions Jacob v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — French-language publishing — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market subject to sale of assets — Decision to approve the purchaser of the assets sold — Action for annulment brought by an unsuccessful prospective purchaser — Trustee’s independence — Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89)

20

2010/C 301/31

Joined Cases T-415/05, T-416/05 and T-423/05: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Greece and Others v Commission (State aid — Aviation Sector — Aid linked to the restructuring and privatisation of the Greek national airline — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and requiring its recovery — Financial continuity between two companies — Identification of the effective recipient of aid for the purposes of its recovery — Criterion of the private operator — Compatibility of the aid with the common market — Obligation to state reasons for the decision)

21

2010/C 301/32

Case T-26/06: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Trioplast Wittenheim v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for industrial plastic sacks — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of the infringement — Fines — Seriousness of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Proportionality)

21

2010/C 301/33

Case T-40/06: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Trioplast Industrier v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for industrial plastic sacks — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Duration of the infringement — Fines — Seriousness of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Proportionality — Joint and several liability — Principal of legal certainty)

22

2010/C 301/34

Case T-193/06: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — TF1 v European Commission (State aid — Aid schemes for cinematographic and audiovisual production — Decision not to raise objections — Actions for annulment — Absence of any significant effect on the competitive position — Inadmissibility)

22

2010/C 301/35

Case T-314/06: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Whirlpool Europe v Council (Dumping — Imports of certain combined refrigerator-freezers originating in South Korea — Definition of the product concerned — Rights of the defence — Advisory Committee — Duty to state reasons — Choice of the method used to define the product concerned — Article 15(2) and Article 20(5) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 15(2) and Article 20(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009))

23

2010/C 301/36

Case T-131/07: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Mohr & Sohn v Commission (Inland waterway transport — Community-fleet capacity — Conditions for putting new vessels into service (‘old for new’ rule) — Commission decision not to grant the specialised vessels exemption — Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 718/1999)

23

2010/C 301/37

Joined Cases T-156/07 and 232/07: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Spain v Commission (Rules on the use of languages — Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of administrators — Publication in all the official languages — Amendments — Regulation No 1 — Articles 27, 28 and Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations — Article 1(1) and (2) of Annex III to the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of non-discrimination)

24

2010/C 301/38

Joined Cases T-166/07 and T-285/07: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Italy v Commission (Rules on the use of languages — Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of administrators and assistants — Publication in three official languages — Amendments — Publication in all the official languages — Choice of the second language from three languages — Regulation No 1 — Articles 27, 28 and 29(1) of the Staff Regulations — Article 1(1) and (2) of Annex III to the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of non-discrimination — Misuse of power)

24

2010/C 301/39

Case T-366/07: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Procter & Gamble v OHIM — Prestige Cosmetics (P&G PRESTIGE BEAUTE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark P&G PRESTIGE BEAUTE — Earlier national figurative marks Prestige — Partial refusal to register — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

25

2010/C 301/40

Case T-72/08: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Travel Service v OHIM — Eurowings Luftverkehrs (smartWings) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark smartWings — Earlier national and international word and figurative marks EUROWINGS and EuroWings — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) — Article 79 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 83 of Regulation No 207/2009))

25

2010/C 301/41

Case T-97/08: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — KUKA Roboter v OHIM (Shade of orange) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a shade of orange — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

26

2010/C 301/42

Case T-135/08: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Schniga v CPVO — Elaris and Brookfield New Zealand (Gala Schnitzer) (Plant varieties — Application for a Community plant variety right for the Gala Schnitzer apple variety — Technical examination — Discretion of the CPVO — Objections — Article 55(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94)

26

2010/C 301/43

Case T-149/08: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Abbott Laboratories v OHIM — aRigen (Sorvir) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Sorvir — Earlier Community word mark NORVIR — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

26

2010/C 301/44

Case T-292/08: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Inditex v OHIM — Marín Díaz de Cerio (OFTEN) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark OFTEN — Earlier national word mark OLTEN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009) — Subject-matter of the dispute before the Board of Appeal — Articles 61 and 62 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Articles 63 and 64 of Regulation No 207/2009))

27

2010/C 301/45

Case T-400/08: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2010 — Enercon v OHIM — BP (ENERCON) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ENERCON — Earlier Community word mark ENERGOL — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Partial refusal to register)

27

2010/C 301/46

Case T-546/08: Judgment of the General Court of 21 September 2010 — Villa Almè v OHIM — Marqués de Murrieta (i GAI) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark iGAI — National word mark YGAY and Community figurative and word marks MARQUÉS DE MURRIETA YGAY — Relative grounds for refusal — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

28

2010/C 301/47

Case T-385/05 TO: Order of the General Court of 6 September 2010 — Portuguese Republic v Transnáutica and Commission (Third-party proceedings — Opportunity for the third party to take part in the original case — No prejudicial effects on the rights of the third party — Inadmissibility)

28

2010/C 301/48

Case T-123/08: Order of the General Court of 2 September 2010 — Spitzer v OHIM — Homeland Housewares (Magic Butler) (Action for annulment — Applicant's failure to act — No need to adjudicate)

29

2010/C 301/49

Case T-532/08: Order of the General Court of 7 September 2010 — Norilsk Nickel Harjavalta and Umicore v Commission (Actions for annulment — Environment and protection of human health — Classification, packaging and labelling of certain nickel carbonate compounds as dangerous substances — Directive 2008/58/EC — Directive 67/548/EEC — Regulation (EC) No 790/2009 — Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 — Amendment of form of order sought — Temporal application of the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)

29

2010/C 301/50

Case T-539/08: Order of the General Court of 7 September 2010 — Etimine and Etiproducts v Commission (Actions for annulment — Environment and protection of human health — Classification, packaging and labelling of certain borates as dangerous substances — Directive 2008/58/EC — Directive 67/548/EEC — Regulation (EC) No 790/2009 — Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 — Amendment of form of order sought — Temporal application of the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)

30

2010/C 301/51

Case T-120/09: Order of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Phoenix-Reisen and DRV v Commission (State aid — Subsidy provided for by German law for insolvent companies — Complaint for alleged breach of Community law — Rejection of the complaint — Adoption of a later decision — No need to adjudicate)

30

2010/C 301/52

Case T-157/09 P: Order of the General Court of 15 September 2010 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Reasonable time for the submission of a claim for compensation — Lateness — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

31

2010/C 301/53

Case T-299/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 31 August 2010 — Babcock Noell v The European joint undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Application for interim measures — Public contracts — Tendering procedure — Rejection of a tender — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Prima facie case — Urgency — Balance of interests)

31

2010/C 301/54

Case T-332/10: Action brought on 10 August 2010 — Viaguara v OHIM — Pfizer (VIAGUARA)

31

2010/C 301/55

Case T-341/10: Action brought on 20 August 2010 — F91 Diddeléng and Others v Commission

32

2010/C 301/56

Case T-345/10: Action brought on 25 August 2010 — Portuguese Republic v Commission

32

2010/C 301/57

Case T-361/10 P: Appeal brought on 25 August 2010 by the European Commission against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 15 June 2010 in Case F-35/08 Pachtitis v Commission

33

2010/C 301/58

Case T-367/10: Action brought on 3 September 2010 — Bloufin Touna Ellas Naftiki Etaireia e.a. v Commission

34

2010/C 301/59

Case T-369/10: Action brought on 2 September 2010 — Handicare v OHIM — Apple Corps (BEATLE)

35

2010/C 301/60

Case T-372/10: Action brought on 3 September 2010 — Bolloré v Commission

35

2010/C 301/61

Case T-373/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Villeroy & Boch Austria v Commission

36

2010/C 301/62

Case T-374/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Villeroy & Boch v Commission

37

2010/C 301/63

Case T-375/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Hansa Metallwerke and Others v Commission

38

2010/C 301/64

Case T-377/10: Action brought on 6 September 2010 — Preparados Alimenticios v OHIM — Rila Feinkost-Importe (Jambo Afrika)

39

2010/C 301/65

Case T-378/10: Action brought on 7 September 2010 — Masco and Others v Commission

40

2010/C 301/66

Case T-379/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Keramag Keramische Werke a.o. v Commission

40

2010/C 301/67

Case T-381/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Sanitec Europe v Commission

41

2010/C 301/68

Case T-382/10: Action brought on 9 September 2010 — Villeroy & Boch v Commission

42

2010/C 301/69

Case T-383/10: Action brought on 7 September 2010 — Continental Bulldog Club Deutschland v OHIM

43

2010/C 301/70

Case T-385/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — ArcelorMittal Wire France and Others v Commission

43

2010/C 301/71

Case T-386/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Dornbracht v Commission

44

2010/C 301/72

Case T-387/10: Action brought on 9 September 2010 — Goutier v OHIM — Eurodata (ARANTAX)

45

2010/C 301/73

Case T-388/10: Action brought on 6 September 2010 — Productos Derivados de Acero v Commission

46

2010/C 301/74

Case T-389/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — SLM v Commission

46

2010/C 301/75

Case T-390/10 P: Appeal brought on 10 September 2010 by Paulette Füller-Tomlinson against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 1 July 2010 in Case F-97/08, Füller-Tomlinson v Parliament

47

2010/C 301/76

Case T-391/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — Nedri Spanstaal v Commission

48

2010/C 301/77

Case T-392/10: Action brought on 6 September 2010 — Euro-Information v OHIM (EURO AUTOMATIC CASH)

48

2010/C 301/78

Case T-393/10: Action brought on 14 September 2010 — Westfälische Drahtindustrie and Others v Commission

49

2010/C 301/79

Case T-394/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — Grebenshikova v OHIM — Volvo Trademark (SOLVO)

50

2010/C 301/80

Case T-395/10: Action brought on 14 September 2010 — Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory v Commission

50

2010/C 301/81

Case T-396/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Zucchetti Rubinetteria v Commission

51

2010/C 301/82

Case T-397/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — ara v OHIM — Allrounder (Representation of a sports shoe bearing the letter A on the side)

51

2010/C 301/83

Case T-398/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Fapricela — Indústria de Trefilaria v Commission.

52

2010/C 301/84

Case T-399/10: Action brought on 14 September 2010 — ArcelorMittal España v Commission

53

2010/C 301/85

Case T-402/10: Action brought on 9 September 2010 — Villeroy & Boch — Belgium v Commission

53

2010/C 301/86

Case T-405/10: Action brought on 10 September 2010 — Justice & Environment v Commission

54

2010/C 301/87

Case T-406/10: Action brought on 15 September 2010 — Emesa-Trefilería and Industrias Galyca v Commission

55

2010/C 301/88

Case T-408/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Roca Sanitario v Commission

55

2010/C 301/89

Case T-409/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — Bottega Veneta International v OHIM (Shape of a handbag)

56

2010/C 301/90

Case T-410/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — Bottega Veneta International v OHIM (Shape of a handbag)

56

2010/C 301/91

Case T-411/10: Action brought on 8 September 2010 — Laufen Austria v Commission

57

2010/C 301/92

Case T-412/10: Action brought on 9 September 2010 — Roca v Commission

57

2010/C 301/93

Case T-415/10: Action brought on 18 September 2010 — Nexans France v Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy

58

2010/C 301/94

Case T-417/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — Cortés del Valle López v OHIM (HIJOPUTA)

59

2010/C 301/95

Case T-418/10: Action brought on 15 September 2010 — voestalpine and voestalpine Austria Draht v Commission

59

2010/C 301/96

Case T-419/10: Action brought on 14 September 2010 — Ori Martin v Commission

60

2010/C 301/97

Case T-420/10: Action brought on 17 September 2010 — Armani v OHIM — Annunziata del Prete (AJ AMICI JUNIOR)

61

2010/C 301/98

Case T-421/10: Action brought on 20 September 2010 — Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana v OHIM — Constantina Sotelo Ares (ROSALIA DE CASTRO)

61

2010/C 301/99

Case T-429/10: Action brought on 17 September 2010 — Global Steel Wire v Commission

62

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2010/C 301/00

Case F-61/10: Action brought on 24 July 2010 — AF v Commission

63

2010/C 301/01

Case F-73/10: Action brought on 3 September 2010 — Coedo Suárez v Council

63

2010/C 301/02

Case F-74/10: Action brought on 9 September 2010 — Kimman v Commission

63

2010/C 301/03

Case F-75/10: Action brought on 10 September 2010 — Scheefer v Parliament

64

2010/C 301/04

Case F-76/10: Action brought on 10 September 2010 — Colart and Others v Parliament

64

2010/C 301/05

Case F-77/10: Action brought on 13 September 2010 — Arroyo Redondo v Commission

65

2010/C 301/06

Case F-78/10: Action brought on 18 September 2010 — Antelo Sanchez and Others v Parliament

65

2010/C 301/07

Case F-79/10: Action brought on 17 September 2010 — Dubus v Commission

66

2010/C 301/08

Case F-81/10: Action brought on 24 September 2010 — Praskevicius v Parliament

66

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN