alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted from the General
Semiconductor, Inc. financial statements for the nine months ended September 30,
1997  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by  references  to  such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0000040656                    
<NAME>    GENERAL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.                    
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         14,649
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  54,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                   763
<INVENTORY>                                    29,278
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,359
<PP&E>                                         208,118
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 542,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,450
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       369
<OTHER-SE>                                     77,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   542,259
<SALES>                                        276,448
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               276,448
<CGS>                                          219,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  261,093
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (76)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,115
<INCOME-TAX>                                   6,318
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (203)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (2,939)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,142)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             259
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,603
<PP&E>                                          48,184
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,494
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              907
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,343
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,450
<SALES>                                          6,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,051
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (42,916)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (42,916)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,916)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
PUBLIC

United States of America

Federal Trade Commission

__________________________________________________

In the Matter of DOCKET NO. 9408 Hon.

Michael D. Chappell

Inuit Inc.

Respondent

__________________________________________________

WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO QUASH AND/OR LIMIT

SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

On October 27, 2022, Lisa Boldini filed a motion to quash and/or limit

Subpoena Duces Tecum (submission number NOA0001581). The Respondent

Intuit, Inc. ("Intuit") has since chosen to withdraw the subpoena; therefore Lisa

Boldini withdraws the motion to quash filed on October 27, 2022.

Dated: November 7, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Lisa N. Boldini

Lisa N. Boldini

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/7/2022 | Document No. 606130 | PAGE Page 1 of 3 * PUBLIC *; 
PUBLIC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on November 7, 2022, I electronically filed a document entitled “Withdrawal

of Motion to Quash and/or Limit Subpoena Duces Tecum” with the Federal Trade

Commission using the FTC E-Filing System, which will send notification of such filing

to:

April Tabor

Office of the Secretary

Federal Trade Commission 600

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite CC-5610

Washington, DC 20580

ElectronicFilings@ftc.gov

The Honorable D. Michael Chappell 600

Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Rm. H-110

Washington, DC 20580

OALJ@ftc.gov

I further certify that on November 7, 2022, I caused the foregoing document to be

served via email to:

Counsel for Respondent Intuit Inc.:

David Z. Gringer

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich St.

New York, NY 10007

Email: david.gringer@wilmerhale.com

7

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/7/2022 | Document No. 606130 | PAGE Page 2 of 3 * PUBLIC *; 
PUBLIC

(212) 230-8800

Dated: November 7, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Lisa N. Boldini

Lisa N. Boldini

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/7/2022 | Document No. 606130 | PAGE Page 3 of 3 * PUBLIC *;
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

Maroh 20, 1939

XonorabloT. IL Trlmble Yirrt Amletant State **SUpOrintennd@t** Auetln, Texarr Dear Sir:

eblr than to sohools. Uaroh lb, 1999, where-

), or th&~$f-ay~i;lon as to whether **tend** o he aoorad ad igb schools **and** have thrir suoh pujllemay attuition aid **out**
11 Ho. 185, belug ths Rural Aid and Equalization **Yund**  propX$$2**  $11 ror tbs current blrnnlun, is Chapter 474, found at page or the Geneurcrl **and** SpaoialLaws d the 45th Legislature,Regular Ses~l~. section 10 thereofreads as follows:

“High School Tuttion. It is hereby expresslyprovided that a sufrlolentamunt or rumis appropriatedby this Aot ahall be used **ror** the paymantor hi@i school Wltlon not to exoeed Seven **and** 60/100 ($7.500) Dollam per ‘. pupil per month. High School tuition shall ba mid aooordlng to the provision8of **Xouee** Bill No. 158, GeneralHon. T. Y; Triable, &oh 20, 1939, Page 2

Law8, Regular Se88lon,Forty-fourthLegislature,and subjlot to the llmltationand restrlotionproridrd In Seotlon?dof thir Aot lmporlngtax obllgatlon8on eendlng dietriot. Providing that the prorlrlo~ or thi8 Seotlon shell not apply to -granting of 8ld under teram ;;l;~~nSeotlon for vocational eduoatlon or orlpgled

It In rurther provided that high rohool tuition aid: a8 ebwe ret out, 8hall be granted for pup118 tranrferredto outride high rohool8 rrotathe Waoo State Home at Waoo, ald from the Alabama and Couehattl Indian Reaervatlonnear Llrlngrton;providedthe aid 80 granted shall not exoeed the per oaplta tuition obarged other 8ohool.s'

tranaierredhigh rohoolpupil8 by the high 8ohoolnarrected thereby." House Bill No. 158, General Law8, Regular Seeslon 44th Leglelature, referredto in-said Seotlon 10, cohstltutss Art&Id 29221 (l),Revised Civil Statuterr, a8 amsnded,and a reading thereor disclose8authority for the paymentoi tuition for a high 8ohool pup11 who Is traneferredfrom one dlstrlotto another on acoount ot the tact that the grade to which such pupil has been promoted 18 not taught In the home dlstrlot. We a8su8m rrom your letter that the p&per grades are taught in the Training Sohool.

A8 the law la now wrltten, there is no authority for the paymsnt or tuition ror the pup118 you Inquireabout out or the State EqualizationFund, and your questlcamust be answered in the negative. Your8 very truly A!l'TORREYGEbIERALO?TEXAS

Se (SIONED) BY Glenn R. Lewis

AssIstant GRL:N A;'PROVZD GEAxLDC.M (SIGNED) Ai-TORNXY

GENHiuL OF TEXA+
#### JOHN C. GOSEWICH, p. b., appellant *vs.*JOHN F. ZEBLEY, d. b., respondent.

A book of original entries is *competent*evidence to be weighed by the jury, though some of the entries be falsified.

New Castle,

November term, 1848.

Appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, on a report of referees, in an action of assumpsit, for medical services and attendance.

The plaintiff proved his books in the usual form; and also proved a presentment of his bill to defendant, and a promise to pay it.

The defendant, contra, called witnesses to contradict the account, and falsify the entries.

*Mr. Johnson,*

to -the jury.—A book regularly and fairly, kept is evidence of things properly chargeable in an account; but if any portion of the charges be shown to be *false,*it not only weakens the weight of the book as evidence, but destroys it altogether. Itjis not an instrument of evidence. • It is different as to a witness. He may be cross examined, and apart of his testimony may be received and a part rejected. Not so óf a book as evidence. There is no *125distinguishing between correct and incorrect charges; if any are shown to be false, the book is not evidence as to any. This is a rule not only of necessity, but of policy. A party relying on his own book exclusively to prove his demand, ought to have no benefit of it, if any part be false. The act of assembly *makes,*the book evidence, if “regularly and fairly kept;” not otherwise.

*Gordon,*for plaintiff.

*Johnson,*for defendant.

*Mr. Gordon*

denied this, and said he had proved the case apart from the book, by the evidence of a promise to pay the account rendered ; and there was a count- on an account stated.

*The Court*

charged the jury, that a book of accounts regularly and fairly kept, together with the plaintiff’s oath, is *competent*evidence as to matters properly chargeable in an account, the *credit*to be left to the jury; and the discrediting any item of the account does not render the book incompetent as a medium of evidence, though it might or might not (as the jury should determine,) *discredit*the whole account, and render the book of no avail. If some of the entries are falsified, it may operate to discredit the whole account, or only a part; according to the weight which the jury shall give to the contradicting evidence; weighing at the same time the corroborating evidence; such as the evidence of a promise to pay the balance appearing on the account, after inspection of the items. This is evidence upon which a plaintiff may recover, under the count for an account stated, if the jury think it sustains that count.

Verdict for plaintiff.
# Official Journal C 350/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.350.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 350 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5515 November 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.350.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 350

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5515 November 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 350/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC (recast)(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)
   (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 350/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC (recast)(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)
   (1)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

              CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         DATE OF REPORT: April 28, 2003
               (Date of earliest event reported) April 25, 2003


                        AMERIVISION COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


           OKLAHOMA                      0-27683                73-1378798
(State or other jurisdiction           (Commission             (IRS Employer
      of incorporation)                File Number)          Identification No.)


                        5900 Mosteller Drive, Suite 1800
                          Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112
               (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

                                 (405) 600-3500
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



Information To Be Included in the Report

<PAGE>
Item. 9.  Regulation F-D Disclosure.

     The Company's previously announced merger negotiations with PowerNet Global
Communications, Inc. were terminated Friday, April 25, 2003.
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                              AMERIVISION COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                              By ROBERT COOK
                                 Robert Cook, President and Chief Executive
                                 Officer

April 28, 2003
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 04, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 04, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0371. BILLY JOE FOWLER v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2017CRW089
Exhibit 31.3



Certification



I, Larry G. Blackwell, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report amendment on Form 10-K/A of Datastream Systems, Inc.;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report amendment does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report amendment;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                                           
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 16, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    LARRY G. BLACKWELLLarry G. Blackwell President and Chief Executive
Officer Datastream Systems, Inc.
July 28, 2014

Mr. Ronald Riga

Director, Quality Control / Chief Inspector

Sierra Pacific Airlines

7700 North Business Park Drive

Tucson, AZ 85743

Dear Mr. Riga:

This is in response to your January 17, 2014, letter sent to the public docket

No. FAA-2014-0052 petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of 

Sierra Pacific Airlines (Sierra), for an exemption from § 121.1117(e)(1) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The proposed exemption, if granted, would enable Sierra to 

continue to operate its fleet of two Boeing 737-200 series airplanes without meeting the 

interim compliance date of December 26, 2014, to modify 50% of its fleet to incorporate 

Ignition Mitigation Means or Flammability Reduction Means required by § 121.1117.

We have reviewed your request and have determined that, each of Sierra’s two airplanes

(N703S and N712S) have an applicable airworthiness certificate that predates the 

applicability date (January 1, 1992), set forth in 14 CFR § 26.33. Accordingly, Sierra 

Pacific’s airplanes are excluded from the compliance times specified in 14 CFR 

§ 121.1117(d)(1) for modification of 50% of its fleet by December 26, 2014. In consideration 

of the foregoing, we have determined that Sierra does not need an exemption. We will take 

no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                    Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



         I, Robert Panico, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer), certify that this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained herein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Gateway Energy Corporation and
its subsidiaries for the periods presented.


Date:  November 14, 2007                    /s/  Robert Panico
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Robert Panico
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 (Principal Executive Officer)
1 

### WIND FIELDS IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

DURING THE 2008 WILD FIRES

Introduction:

The MM5 model was used to develop wind fields to assess the transport of smoke

originating from wildfires that occurred in Northern California i n June and July 2008

.

The MM5 model was set up with three nested grids to study the meteorology.

Synoptic conditions:

A large scale pressure system located off the coast of California had dominated the

area and induced subsidence motion and associated high temperatures that were

co nducive the occurrence of wildfire events (Figure 1). Dominant wind over California

was from the northwest while the local scale wind s had changing wind direction

, owing

to topography as well as local temperature differences

.

Model Simulations:

June 23 a nd 26, 2008 and July 11, 19, and 23, 2008 were chosen as smoke episodes

that affected the Sacramento Valley during the summer of 2008. Two model

simulations were carried out; with one starting on June 21, 2008 00Z and ending on

June 27, 2008 00Z, and anot her starting on July 9, 2008 00Z and ending on July 24,

2008 12Z.

Results:

Wind vectors and associated streamlines predicted by the model near the surface on

June 23 and 26, and July 11, 19, and 23 were plotted and hourly variations were

examined. The wind vectors (Figures 2, 4, 6, 8, 10) and streamlines (Figures 3, 5, 7, 9,

11) confirmed the hourly surface observations that downslope winds, generated by2

cooling of air near the surface on the western sides of Sierra Nevada Mountains in

northern Californ ia, were largely responsible in carrying the smoke plumes originating

from the wildfires burning in Northern California.3

Figure 1: Sea level pressure affecting the area on June 23, 2008 at 00Z.4

Figure 2 : Wind vectors predicted by the model at 15Z on June 23, 2008.5

Figure 3 : Streamlines predicted by the model at 15Z on June 23, 2008.6

Figure 4 : Wind vectors predicted by the model at 12Z on June 26, 2008.7

Figure 5 : Streamlines predicted by the model at 12Z on June 26, 2008.8

Figure 6 : Wind vectors predicted by the model at 15Z on July 11, 2008.9

Figure 7 : Streamlines pred icted by the model at 15Z on July 11, 2008.10

Figure 8 : Wind vectors predicted by the model at 13Z on July 19, 2008.11

Figure 9 : Streamlines predicted by the model at 13Z on July 19, 2008.12

Figure 10 : Wind vectors predicted by the model at 12Z on July 23, 2008.13

Figure 1 1 : Streamlines predicted by the model at 12Z on July 23, 2008.
IV

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 16

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any change in

the current policy regarding homosexuals in the Armed Forces should

be made by law, rather than by Executive order.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. DUNCAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

any change in the current policy regarding homosexuals

in the Armed Forces should be made by law, rather

than by Executive order.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that any change in the current policy regard3 ing homosexuals in the Armed Forces (stating that homo4 sexuality is incompatible with military service and requir5 ing the separation from the Armed Forces of military per6 sonnel who are homosexual) should be made by law, rather

7 than by Executive order.

Æ