alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GULFSTREAM PARK RACING ASSOCIATION, Inc., Appellant, v. Elizabeth R. BERRY and John W. Berry, Appellees.

No. 69-843.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 21, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 761 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 761

 To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 to include 
 Montgomery and Roanoke Counties, Virginia, as part of the Appalachian 
                                region.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1993

 Mr. Boucher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 to include 
 Montgomery and Roanoke Counties, Virginia, as part of the Appalachian 
                                region.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF MONTGOMERY AND ROANOKE COUNTIES, VIRGINIA, AS 
              PART OF APPALACHIAN REGION.

    The 12th undesignated paragraph of section 403 of the Appalachian 
Regional Development Act of 1965 (40 U.S.C. App. 403) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``Montgomery (including the city of 
        Radford),'' after ``Lee,''; and
            (2) by inserting ``Roanoke,'' after ``Pulaski,''.

                                 <all>
```
[ARTICLE] 3
[MULTIPLIER]   1,000
Part II.  Other information,   Item 6a.
Exhibit 11.1
 
                              CORNERSTONE IMAGING, INC.
             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                (UNAUDITED)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
                                                     Sept 30,          Sept 30,
                                              ------------------- -------------------
                                                1997      1996      1997      1996
                                              --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S>                                            <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Net income (loss)                               $7       $432       $893    ($2,434)
                                              ========= ========= ========= =========
 
Common Stock equivalents                          16       62         22       511
 
Weighted average shares
   outstanding                                   7,095     7,496     7,324     7,140
 
Total shares                                     7,111     7,558     7,324     7,452
                                              ========= ========= ========= =========
 
Per share amount                                ($0.00)   ($0.06)    $0.12    ($0.33)
                                              ========= ========= ========= =========
 
</TABLE>
#### Krutsky v. Hazle Brook Coal Co., Appellant.

Argued March 14, 1934.

Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*438P. *B. Roads,*for appellant.

*Roger J. Dever,*for appellee.

July 13, 1934:

Opinion by

Trexuer, P., J.,

This is an action under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The claimant’s right to compensation must be found in the following facts: While working as a miner on April 17, 1931, in the employ of the defendant, he loaded a car and when the car was loaded he began to push it using a sprag in the wheel, and putting his shoulder against the car, and every time he pushed it, before he could get his shoulder out, it would come back in the same place. Continuing his exertion to move the car something “busted” in his side. A little lump came out. The workman was frightened, had pain, and lay down on the road waiting for his fellow-workmen, and finally one of them came and he told him what had happened. This was about one-half hour after he was stricken, without any one being with him in the meanwhile. He reported the accident to the company; he walked home; saw the doctor afterwards. He stayed home a week. The doctor then told him to go to work. He continued to work suffering pain in the locality until it became too intense and on October 17th, he stopped work and has been unable to work ever since. Dr. Nash, who was called for the claimant, testified that the claimant, no doubt, had some adhesions resulting from an operation for appendicitis, and “in making that extra exertion pulled some of the adhesions *439away.” “And I think that is giving him his trouble ever since.” "Whilst the doctor used on one occasion the word “probably” the whole tenor of his testimony was that the pulling away of the adhesions followed the trauma that occurred when he was trying to move the car. There was sufficient testimony to support the conclusion of the referee. There is also evidence that the claimant is totally disabled.

The judgment is affirmed.
261 La. 1056

#### LAMASTUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. and Maryland Casualty Company v. GULF INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 52456.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 23, 1972.

In re: Gulf Insurance Company applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 260 So.2d 83.

Writ denied. The result is correct.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.14

      Amendments to the 1989 Stock Compensation Plan and Predecessor Plans
     of U.S. Trust Corporation As Amended and Restated through July 1, 1997

      RESOLVED that Section 4.4(e) of the Plan is hereby amended effective April
28, 1998 by replacing the reference to "15 days" with "2 business days".

      RESOLVED that Section 4.6(c) of the Plan is hereby amended effective
January 1, 1998 to read as follows:

      (c) A Participant may elect to have payment with respect to the Interest
Portion and the PSU Portion of his or her Account made in the form of a single
lump sum payment or in the form of a series of 5 or 15 annual installments. A
single lump sum payment shall consist of (i) a number of Common Shares equal to
the number of whole PSUs included in the balance of the PSU Portion of the
Participant's account, and (ii) cash in an amount equal to the sum of (A) the
balance of the interest portions of the Participant's account, and (B) an amount
determined by multiplying the fractional part, if any, of a PSU included in the
balance of the PSU Portion of the Participant's Account by the Average Market
Value of one Common Share on the Business Day immediately preceding the date on
which such payment is to be made. Such payment shall be made to the Participant
or, if the Participant's Account becomes payable by reason of his or her death,
to the Participant's Beneficiary. Payment shall be made on the last Business Day
of February of the Plan Year following the year in which the Participant's
employment with the Corporation and all of its Affiliated Companies terminates.
If payment is made in the form of a series of 5 or 15 annual installments,
payment shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.6(b)(i),
(ii), (iii) and (iv). An election under this Section 4.7(c) shall be made in
writing, on a form that is provided by the Committee for such purpose and that
is filed by the Participant with the Committee at least one year prior to the
date on which the Participant's employment with the Corporation and all of its
Affiliated Companies terminates. Any election so made may be revoked, and a new
election may be made hereunder after such revocation. Any such revocation or new
election shall be made in the same manner, and by the same date, as described in
the second preceding sentence. No election or revocation of an election made
hereunder shall be given effect unless it is made within the time prescribed
herein.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Cheryl
Kaine Sadowski, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of MedClean Technologies,
Inc., (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1. The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the three month period ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
November 9, 2009





/s/
Cheryl Kaine Sadowski





Cheryl
Kaine Sadowski


Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20580 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

CASE NAME 

Ardagh Group S.A., et al. 

FILE/DOCKET NUMBER 

009356 

Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Commission's Rules of Practice, I (we) am (are) entering in 

proceeding the appearance of 

D counsel supporting the complaint (Complete Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 below) 

D counsel or representative for the respondent (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

1:81 counsel or representative for a third party (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

1. COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATIVE 

Include the name, address, email address, and telephone 

number of each counsel or representative entering an 

appearance in the above proceeding, 

Paul Friedman 

paul.friedman@dechert.com 

Dechert LLP 

1900 K Street, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20006 

Phone Number: 202-261-3398 

Justin Pentz 

justin.pentz@dechert.com 

Dechert LLP 

Cira Centre 

2929 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19104 

Phone Number: 215-994-2395 

3. ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 

4. SIGNATURE OF SENIOR COUNSEL 

(Paul Friedman) 

2. RESPONDENT(S) OR THIRD PARTY(IES) 

Include the address and telephone numbers of all persons, 

partnerships, corporations, or associations on whose behalf 

this Notice of Appearance is being fi led. 

Crown Holdings, Inc. 

Crown Holdings, Inc. 

One Crown Way 

Philadelphia, PA 19154 

Phone Number 215-698-5100 

5. DATE SIGNED 

12/9/2013 

Return this form to: Federal Trade Commission 

Room H-113 

FTC Form 232 (rev 7/11) 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20580
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 596 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 596

To authorize civil actions for certain violations involving depository 
                             institutions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1993

Mr. Kanjorski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize civil actions for certain violations involving depository 
                             institutions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Savings and Loan Asset Recovery 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CIVIL ACTIONS FOR CERTAIN VIOLATIONS INVOLVING DEPOSITORY 
              INSTITUTIONS.

    (a) Section 951 of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and 
Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 1833a) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(g) Civil Actions for Certain Violations.--A person may bring a 
civil action to assess a civil penalty for a violation referred to in 
subsection (c) in the same manner and subject to the same procedures as 
a person may bring an action under section 3730 of title 31, United 
States Code, for a violation of section 3729 of such title.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### Quigg *v.*City of Philadelphia, Appellant.

Argued December 15, 1933.

Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*Thomas B. K. Ringe,*and with him *Ernest Lowengrund,*Assistant City Solicitors, and *David J. Smyth,*City Solicitor, for appellant

*103
      *Martin Feldman,*for appellee.

April 23, 1934:

Opinion bt

Cunningham, J.,

The same, and only the same, questions are involved in this appeal as were involved in the appeal of Joseph D. Egan v. City of Philadelphia, 113 Pa. Superior Ct. 93, except that in the present case there was but one suspension, beginning July 10, and extending to December 31,1931. The amount here claimed was, therefore, $1,044, with interest, and the court below entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $1,101.

For the reasons stated at length in the opinion this day filed in the Egan case the judgment here appealed from is affirmed, subject to a reduction of $180 from its principal ¡sum.

Judgment modified and affirmed.
# Official Journal C 466I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 466I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6418 November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 466I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6418 November 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 466 I/01 | Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union | 1 |
| 2021/C 466 I/02 | Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2021/C 466 I/03 | Information communicated by member states regarding closure of fisheries | 5 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 466 I/01

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

1

2021/C 466 I/02

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2021/C 466 I/03

Information communicated by member states regarding closure of fisheries

5

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### In the Matter of THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner.

No. 41007.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 13, 1971.

John M. McCarty, Fort Pierce, President of The Florida Bar and Edward J. Atkins, Miami, for The Florida Bar.

PER CURIAM.

Upon petition of The Florida Bar, the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 32 F.S.A. is amended by the addition thereto of a new article as follows:

> ARTICLE XX

> The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar may establish a Law Student Division of The Florida Bar with such organization, purposes and powers that may be fixed by By-Laws to be approved by the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar.

This rule shall become effective immediately upon filing of this order.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Joseph Lukas, Respondent, v Donald J. Trump, Doing Business as the Trump Organization, et al., Appellants.

[721 NYS2d 394]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants, Donald J. Trump, d/b/a The Trump Organization, Beach Haven Apartments No. 3, Inc., and Trump Management, Inc., appeal from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated September 23, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict finding the defendants Beach Haven Apartments No. 3, Inc., and Trump Management, Inc., 100% at fault in the happening of the accident and awarding the plaintiff $600,000 for past pain and suffering and $700,000 for future pain and suffering, is in favor of the plaintiff and against all of the defendants, and (2) an amended judgment of the same court, entered October 22, 1999, which, upon the jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants Beach Haven Apartments No. 3, Inc., and Trump Management, Inc.

Ordered that the appeal from the judgment is dismissed, as the judgment was superseded by the amended judgment; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal by Donald J. Trump, d/b/a The Trump Organization, from the amended judgment is dismissed, as he is not aggrieved by the amended judgment *(see,*CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent, payable by the defendants Beach Haven Apartments No. 3, Inc., and Trump Management, Inc.

The plaintiff, then a 60-year-old man with polio who used *401crutches and leg braces to walk, was injured when he slipped in the basement entrance of a building owned by the defendants Beach Haven Apartments No. 3, Inc., and Trump Management, Inc. He suffered a fractured hip which required surgery, has been unable to resume using crutches, and is now confined to a wheelchair.

The trial court properly precluded the defendants from asking the plaintiff about his prior difficulties and accidents while using crutches. Such evidence would not be admitted to prove negligence on the part of the plaintiff *(see, Bowers v Johnson,*26 AD2d 552). Moreover, even if the defendants had a proper purpose for the introduction of that evidence, they failed to offer any proof that the prior accidents were similar to the instant accident *(see, Hartley v Szadkowski,*32 AD2d 550).

The trial court correctly provided the jury with a general verdict sheet, since the plaintiff had only one theory of liability *(see, Food Pageant v Consolidated Edison Co.,*54 NY2d 167), and the jury charge was proper.

The award of damages did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation *(see,*CPLR 5501 [c]). Friedmann, J. P., Florio, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal C 301A/7 De

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 301A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 477 December 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 301A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 477 December 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training |
| 2004/C 301A/1 | Vacancy notice for a director (m/f) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

2004/C 301A/1

Vacancy notice for a director (m/f)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Mary M. SIMON v. CROWLEY INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 54378.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 1, 1974.

In re: Crowley Industries, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Acadia. 287 So.2d 549.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the judgment is correct.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Norristown Academy Charter School :

:

v. : No. 745 C.D. 2023

:

Norristown Area School District, :

Appellant :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, January 2, 2024

, having considered A ppell ant ’s application for

reargument and Appellee’s answer in response thereto

, the application is DENIED

.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 791

To name the United States courthouse in Benton, Illinois, the ‘‘James L.

Foreman Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1993

Mr. POSHARD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To name the United States courthouse in Benton, Illinois,

the ‘‘James L. Foreman Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. JAMES L. FOREMAN COURTHOUSE.

4 (a) NAME.—The United States courthouse located at

5 301 West Main Street in Benton, Illinois, is named the

6 ‘‘James L. Foreman Courthouse’’.

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula8 tion, document, record, map, or other paper of the United

9 States to the courthouse referred to in subsection (a) is
2

•HR 791 IH

1 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James L. Foreman

2 Courthouse’’.

Æ
<TABLE>
Exhibit 11            COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      Fluke Corporation and Subsidiaries

<CAPTION>                           QUARTER ENDED         THREE QUARTERS ENDED
                                 1/24/97     1/26/96       1/24/97     1/26/96
                              <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>
<S>
Shares issued and outstanding
  at beginning of period       8,700,840   8,625,728    8,652,955    8,475,725
Net issuance of shares under
  employee stock plans,
  weighted average                 8,252         747       37,435      107,280
Weighted average common
  shares outstanding           8,709,092   8,626,475    8,690,390    8,583,005
Assumed exercise of stock
  options, weighted average
  of incremental shares          357,968     232,937      279,994      265,906
Average shares and
  share equivalents
  outstanding                  9,067,060   8,859,412    8,970,384    8,848,911
Earnings per share            $     0.82  $     0.77  $      2.16  $      1.89
Net Income                    $7,422,000  $6,831,000  $19,385,000  $16,690,000
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                  2,564  
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                             714   
<ALLOWANCES>                                0  
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS><F1>                        0
<PP&E>                                167,926      
<DEPRECIATION>                         44,246           
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        173,173      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES><F1>                   0
<BONDS>                               105,971      
<COMMON>                                   83 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                             40,551           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          173,173      
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       16,397     
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          13,470     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          138
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      5,363    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         2,881    
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     2,881    
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            2,881    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .38 
<FN>                                        
<F1> Mid-Atlantic Realty Trust (MART) is in the specialized real estate
<F1> industry for which the current/noncurrent distinction is deemed in
<F1> practice to have little or no relevance.  Therefore, MART prepares
<F1> unclassified balance sheets which do not report current assets or
<F1> current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>