alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       73,857
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          11,355
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         1,267
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   3,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,565
<COMMON>                                         2,397
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       11,347
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             15,566
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  27,362
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        600
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            23,500
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               5,800
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  32,303
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   89,565
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       38,827
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             1,077
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      10,212
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      35,457
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          3,370
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  24
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   3,394
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,420
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,974
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         14
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    1,960
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           926
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        1,118
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           6,226
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 Date: December 6, 2007
    
    /s/ CHARLES A. RATNERName: Charles A. RatnerTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ THOMAS G. SMITHName: Thomas G. SmithTitle: Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Dobson CC Limited Partnership and Bank of America Working
                         Toward Completion of Agreement

OKLAHOMA CITY, April 22, 2003 (PRIMEZONE) -- Dobson  Communications  Corporation
(Nasdaq:DCEL)  announced today that its majority shareholder,  Dobson CC Limited
Partnership  (DCCLP),  has advised  the Company  that DCCLP and Bank of America,
N.A.  have   extended  the  time  for  the   completion  of  the  amendment  and
restructuring of DCCLP's loan to Friday, April 25, 2003.

On March 31, 2003, DCCLP announced that it had reached an agreement in principle
with Bank of America for the amendment and  restructuring of the loan. Under the
agreement  in  principle,  DCCLP will  maintain  controlling  interest in Dobson
Communications,  and any change of control  risk  (under the credit  agreements,
indentures and preferred stock provisions to which Dobson Communications and its
subsidiaries  are  parties)   arising  from  a  subsequent   default  under  the
restructured loan would be permanently  eliminated.  DCCLP stated today that the
key terms of the agreement,  including the  elimination of the change of control
risk, remain unchanged from March 31.

The  agreement in principle is not binding on either party and is subject to the
completion  of a  definitive  agreement.  Dobson  Communications  can provide no
assurance that DCCLP and Bank of America will complete the transactions provided
for in the agreement in principle.

Dobson  Communications is a leading provider of wireless phone services to rural
markets in the United  States.  Headquartered  in Oklahoma  City,  Dobson serves
markets  in 17  states.  For  additional  information  on the  Company  and  its
operations, please visit its Web site at www.dobson.net.

-0-

CONTACT: Dobson Communications, Oklahoma City
         J. Warren Henry
         (405) 529-8820
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eugene EDWARDS a/k/a Eugene Williams.

No. 61891.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 14, 1978.

Woodrow W. Wyatt, of Wyatt & Weimer, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara B. Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie B. Brown, Dist. Atty., Warren J. Hebert, Marilyn Castle, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
257 La. 167

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bruce KILBOURNE.

No. 51024.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1970.

In re: Bruce Kilbourne applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Not considered. Sentence has not yet been imposed. The application is premature.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28254-28255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13043]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[NPS-WASO-NAGPRA-NPS0025638; PPWOCRADN0-PCU00RP14.R50000]


Notice of Inventory Completion: La Plata County Historical 
Society, Durango, CO; Correction

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The La Plata County Historical Society has corrected a Notice 
of Inventory Completion published in the Federal Register on April 4, 
2018. This notice corrects a paragraph that contains an error.

ADDRESSES: Kathy McKenzie, Board President, La Plata County Historical 
Society, 3065 W 2nd Avenue, Durango, CO 81301, telephone (970) 259-
2402, email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#88ece1faedebfce7fac8e9e6e1e5e9fbe5fdfbedfde5a6e7faef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0e6a677c6b6d7a617c4e6f6067636f7d637b7d6b7b6320617c69">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published as part of the 
National Park Service's administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 
25 U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in this notice are the sole 
responsibility of the museum, institution, or Federal

[[Page 28255]]

agency that has control of the Native American human remains. The 
National Park Service is not responsible for the determinations in this 
notice.
    This notice corrects a Notice of Inventory Completion published in 
the Federal Register (83 FR 14490-14492, April 4, 2018). A paragraph 
summarizing the determinations made by the La Plata County Historical 
Society cited an incorrect reference in the original notice.

Correction

    In the Federal Register (83 FR 14492, April 4, 2018), column 2, 
paragraph 1, under the heading ``Determination Made by the La Plata 
County Historical Society, Durango, CO'' is corrected by substituting 
the following paragraph:

    Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3005(a), the repatriation of the human 
remains may be to The Tribes.

    Dated: May 21, 2018.
Melanie O'Brien,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2018-13043 Filed 6-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
 
                                  Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-49549, No. 333-59855, No. 333-30561, No. 
333-89908, and No. 333-64477) and Form S-3 (No.333-44559, No. 333-30473, 
No. 333-70937, and No. 333-45463) of P-Com, Inc. of our report dated January 22,
1998 (except for Note 10 which is as of March 28, 1998) appearing on page 41 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


San Jose, California
April 30, 1999
# EXHIBIT 32.1

** **

FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FirstHartford Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I Neil H.Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

1.         The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ NeilH. Ellis

NeilH. Ellis

Presidentand Chief Executive Officer

 

Date:March 26, 2010
#### REID v. GENERAL INSURANCE CO.

No. 38205.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 216 So.2d 41.
### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 16

- 00276

- CV

ROBERT DAVENPORT AND JAYNE EDISON , Appellants

V.

DR. SAMUEL MAXWELL A DU

- LARTEY AND ATHLET IC ORTHOPEDICS AND

KNEE CENTER, P.A. D/ B/A AOK ORTHOPEDICS , Appellees

Appeal from the 189th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2014

- 71784).

TO THE 189TH DISTRIC T COURT OF HARRIS CO UNTY, GREETINGS :

Before this Court, on the 8th day of June 2017, the case upon appeal to revise or to

reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on March 4, 2016. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the a rguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellants, Robert Davenport and Jayne Edison, joi ntly and severally, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.Judgment rendered June 8, 2017.

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd. Opinion delivered by Justice Massengale.

WHEREFORE , WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

May 25, 2018

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
#### Joseph Vincent HALE, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43512.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 24, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 273 So.2d 145.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ„ concur.
#### Ralph E. LANG, Jr., Appellant, v. Jo Ann LANG, Appellee.

No. 73-486.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 7, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
31.1





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Daniel
W. Rumsey, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Azzurra Holding
Corporation;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;





4. The
Company’ other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the Company and have:





a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s
auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):





a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect The Company’ ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and





b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
      August 14, 2008
            
            /s/ 
      Daniel W.
      RumseyDaniel
      W. Rumsey
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              and
      Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
#### Jack DANIELS et al. v. Ralph A. CHAPUIS and Helen M. Chapuis.

SC 2663.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 2, 1977.

*1115Sanford D. Weiss of Weiss and Sawyer, Montgomery, for appellants.

J. Donald Reynolds, Montgomery, for ap-pellees.

SHORES, Justice.

This is the second appeal in this case. In *Daniels v. Chapuis,*344 So.2d 500 (Ala.1977), this court remanded the cause and directed the trial court to take “ . . . further testimony respecting the specifics of the restrictive conditions for future dragstrip operations . . ..” (344 So.2d at 504)

On remand, the trial court took additional testimony and modified its former order by substituting a concrete wall of specified dimensions for the former requirement of a 15' X *Vs"*plywood fence and a three cable fence as a barrier between the properties of each party.

Daniels again appeals, this time contending that the trial court must be reversed because it refused to hear additional testimony with respect to the hours which the drag strip should be allowed to operate. There was evidence in the prior record to support the trial court’s finding with respect to this issue. Therefore, additional evidence on this issue was not mandated on remand.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
UN I TE D ST AT ES D I STR I CT C OU RT F O R T H E D IS T R IC T O F C O LU M B IA

__________________________________________ ) Z HI CHEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Ci vi l A cti on No. 08 -02 52 (P L F) ) DI STRI CT OF COLUMBIA, e t al

. , ) ) De fe nd ants . ) __________________________________________)
ORDER F or the re a so ns se t f

or th i n th e Me mor and

um O pin ion

iss ue d th is s ame da

y , it is here by ORDERED that the motion to dism iss for insufficie nt service of proc ess pursuant to R ule 12 (b )( 5) of

the F e de ra l Ru le s o f C ivi l Pr oc e dure by de fe nd ants the Di str ic t of Col umb ia
and Cha nc ham Sp e ars [2] is G RA NT ED ; and

it i s F UR TH ER O RD ERE D that pl a int if f’ s c la ims a g a ins t th e Di str ic t of Col umb ia and Chanc ham Spear s are DI SMI SSED withoutprejudice
.

SO ORDERED.

/s/________________________ PAULL . FRI EDMAN Un i t edS t at es Di s tri ctJ u d ge DATE: Mar ch 25, 2009
No. 10466.

#### The Buckeye Brewing Co. *v.*Kraft et al.

Decided April 14, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Putnam county.

*Messrs. Bailey & Leas%ire,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Eastman & Gosling,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Si-iauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
# Official Journal C 150/27 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 150 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6127 April 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 150

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6127 April 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 150/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2018 to 31 March 2018(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 150/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2018 to 31 March 2018(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMPACE CORP. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         539,165
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,238,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                   154,057
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,689,513
<PP&E>                                      17,951,350
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,805,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,131,446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,792,446
<BONDS>                                     10,510,938
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,476,182
<OTHER-SE>                                  (2,414,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,131,446
<SALES>                                     34,856,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,856,505
<CGS>                                       35,625,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,625,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (855,688)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,492,988)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (236,448)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,256,540)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.41)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2409

AGERE ABATE FEKADU,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A76-433-983 )

Submitted: May 7, 2004 Decided: July 16, 2004

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James A. Roberts, LAW OFFICES OF JAMES A. ROBERTS, Falls Church,

Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney

General, Emily Anne Radford, Assistant Director, James A. Hunolt,

Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Agere Abate Fekadu, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) affirming, without opinion, the immigration

judge’s denial of her application for asylum and withholding of

removal. 

On appeal, Fekadu raises challenges to the immigration

judge’s determination that she failed to establish her eligibility

for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying

eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence [s]he

presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could

fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v.

Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the

evidence of record and conclude that Fekadu fails to show that the

evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant

the relief that Fekadu seeks. 

Additionally, we conclude Fekadu’s claim that the Board’s

use of the summary affirmance procedure under 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(e)(4)

(2002) violated her rights under the Due Process Clause is

foreclosed by our recent decision in Blanco de Belbruno v.

Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 272 (4th Cir. 2004). In Blanco de Belbruno, we

held that “the BIA’s streamlining regulations do not violate an

alien’s rights to due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.”

Id. at 282-83. 
- 3 -

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
No. 00-732.

#### Young *v.*City of Sulphur, Louisiana.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.