alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12


                            FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION
                       Statement of Computation of Ratios
                              (Dollars In Millions)


     Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges:



                                       Twelve-Months         Year Ended
                                      Ended March 31,       December 31,
                                       1997     1996       1996     1995
                                      ------   ------     ------   ------

     Net Income                       $234.7   $228.9     $238.4   $227.0 

     Add:
      Operating Income Taxes           132.8    130.8      135.8    129.5   
      Other Income Taxes                (0.4)     0.2       (0.1)     0.1   
                                      ------   ------     ------   ------
     Income Before Taxes               367.1    359.9      374.1    356.6  

     Total Interest Charges             98.3    102.9       98.4    104.5   
                                      ------   ------     ------   ------
     Total Earnings (A)               $465.4   $462.8     $472.5   $461.1  
                                      ------   ------     ------   ------
     Fixed Charges (B)                $ 98.3   $102.9     $ 98.4   $104.5  
                                      ------   ------     ------   ------
      Ratio of Earnings to
       Fixed Charges (A/B)              4.73     4.50       4.80     4.41    
                                       =====    =====      =====    =====
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS ATTACHED AS AN EXHIBIT TO THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         116,610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,976<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (32,892)
<INVENTORY>                                    200,203
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               402,018
<PP&E>                                         365,436<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                               (165,395)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 894,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,250,344
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,046,165<F3>
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   894,358
<SALES>                                      1,357,965
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,357,965
<CGS>                                          303,715
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  303,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,784,802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,037<F4>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,754,589)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,754,589)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,754,589)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)
<FN>
<F1>This is the balance before deducting allowance for doubtful accounts.
<F2>This is the balance before deducting accumulated depreciation.
<F3>This includes amounts paid in excess of par value.
<F4>This is net of interest income of $24,505.
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 116 (Friday, June 15, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 28012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12909]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Cumulative Report of Rescissions Proposals Pursuant to the 
Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974

AGENCY: Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and 
Budget.

ACTION: Notice of monthly cumulative report pursuant to the 
Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control 
Act of 1974, OMB is issuing a cumulative report from the Director 
detailing the status of rescission proposals that were previously 
transmitted to the Congress on May 8, 2018, and amended by the 
supplementary message transmitted on June 5, 2018.

DATES: Release Date: June 8, 2018.

ADDRESSES: The cumulative report is available on-line on the OMB 
website at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget-rescissions-deferrals/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Andreasen, 6001 New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, Email address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ea808b848e988f8b998f84aa858788c48f859ac48d859c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86ece7e8e2f4e3e7f5e3e8c6e9ebe4a8e3e9f6a8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>, telephone number: (202) 395-3645. Because of 
delays in the receipt of regular mail related to security screening, 
respondents are encouraged to use electronic communications.

John Mulvaney,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2018-12909 Filed 6-14-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3110-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6858

MARTIN SANTOS CRUZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD W. ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-95-1564-AM)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martin Santos Cruz, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as

amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to

the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny

such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. Cruz v. Angelone, No. CA-95-1564-AM (E.D. Va.

Apr. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1208** 

HENRY LEWIS ASTROP , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. ANITA NEWTON , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. John A. Gibney, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:16

- cv - 00036

- JAG )

Submitted : August 4, 2016 Decided: August 9, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KING , Circuit Judge, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Henry Lewis Astrop, Appellant Pro Se. Anita Newton, Lawrenceville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Henry Lewis Astrop seeks to appeal the district cou rt’s order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (20 12 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2 0 12 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The order Astrop seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Central Va. Legal Aid , 807 F.3d 6 19 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction , and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Astrop to file an amended complaint . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contenti ons are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Liberty Financial Companies, Inc. of our report dated January 27, 2000,
included in the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders of Liberty Financial
Companies, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedules of Liberty Financial
Companies, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). These schedules are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedules referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-61511) pertaining to the Liberty Financial Companies, Inc.
Savings and Investment Plan, in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
333-61509 and Form S-8 No. 333-28073) pertaining to the Liberty Financial
Companies Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-90626) pertaining to the Liberty Financial Companies, Inc. 1990 Stock
Option Plan, 1995 Stock Incentive Plan and 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-20067) pertaining to the
Liberty Financial Companies Inc. Dividend Reinvestment Plan of our report dated
January 27, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding
paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedules included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Liberty Financial Companies, Inc.

                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 2000
No. 72-983.

#### Lightman *v.*Maryland.

Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000936094
<NAME>                        LINC Capital, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               1,428
<SECURITIES>                                         1,087
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,791
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                              38,717
<DEPRECIATION>                                       8,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     248,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                            178,973
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            29,285
<OTHER-SE>                                          12,156
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       248,884
<SALES>                                             32,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    73,042
<CGS>                                               26,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       26,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    24,183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     5,280
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9,172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      7,618
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3,024
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4,594
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4,594
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.86
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(1)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Florida Public Utilities Company (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, John English, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/John English

John English
Chief Executive Officer
August 11, 2003

{MI670281;1}
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,As adopted pursuant toSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Binding Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2003, (the "Report"), I, Don Civgin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:

/s/ Don      Civgin                                 
 
Don Civgin
 
Senior Vice President and Chief      Financial Officer
 
November 13, 2003
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Forlink Software Corporation, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Hongkeung Lam, Chief Financial Officer, certify, solely for purposes of Title
18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to my
knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Hongkeung LamHongkeung
      LamChief
      Financial OfficerDated:
      March 26, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 28631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER18-1775-000]


Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing 
Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization: 64KT 8me LLC

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding 
64KT 8me LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an 
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is July 3, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#276162756468494b4e494274525757485553674142554409404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="662023342529080a0f080335131616091412260003140548010910">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: June 13, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-13203 Filed 6-19-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Dwight MANIS, Appellant, v. Elaine G. PRUDHOMME et al., Appellees.

No. 72-280.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 29, 1973.

C. Fred Denius, Indialantic, for appellant.

Richard F. Conrad, Driscoll, Conrad & Langston, Orlando, for appellee Elaine G. Prudhomme.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant applied for a continuance of the trial in a personal injury action because a key witness had been subpoenaed and failed to appear. Critical to the disposition of the appeal is a showing in the record that the witness was in fact served with a witness subpoena. Such subpoena and return of service is not in our appellate record and, hence, we are unable to determine that the trial court actually abused its discretion in denying appellant’s request for a continuance. The duty of affirmatively demonstrating error is upon the aggrieved party, the appellant. City of North Miami v. Benjamin, Fla.App.1961, 128 So.2d 753. Likewise, it is his duty to perfect the appellate record. Latin American Benefit Center, Inc. v. Johstoneaux, Fla.App.1972, 257 So.2d 86; Gulf Heating & Refrigeration Co. v. Iowa Mutual Ins. Co., Fla.1966, 193 So.2d 4.

Affirmed.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ„ and WARREN, LAMAR, Associate Judge, concur.
Exhibit 31(2)



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMPANY

(Section 302)

I, George M. Bachman, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Florida Public Utilities Company (the registrant);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2004

By  /s/ George M. Bachman

George M. Bachman

Chief Financial Officer