alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99

                     FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS ANNOUNCES COMPLETION OF SENIOR NOTES OFFERING

OKLAHOMA CITY, June 22, 2000 (PRIMEZONE) -- Dobson
Communications Corporation (Nasdaq:DCEL) announced today
that it has completed a private placement of $300 million
principal amount of 10-7/8% Senior Notes due 2010.  The
Senior Notes were issued at a price of $992.45 per Senior Note.

The transaction resulted in net proceeds to the Company of
approximately $290.3 million, which the Company intends to
use to pay down bank debt and for working capital and other
general corporate purposes.

This press release contains "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These include, but are not limited to,
statements regarding the amount and use of proceeds.  Such
statements are inherently subject to a variety of risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those projected.  A discussion of the risk
factors that could impact these areas and the Company's
overall business and financial performance can be found in
the Company's reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.  Given these concerns, investors and analysts
should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements.
                           -0-

CONTACT:       J. Warren Henry
               Vice President, Investor Relations
               (405) 529-8820
<PAGE>
                          EXHIBIT 23


               Consent of Independent Accountants


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the

Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on

Form S-4 (File No.33-91250) of Frontier Telephone of Rochester,

Inc. of our report dated January 25, 1999 appearing on page 17 of

Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference of

our report on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears on

page 42 of this Form 10-K.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
_____________________________
   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Rochester, New York
March 26, 1999
261 La. 229

#### Claude E. NICHOLS v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY et al.

No. 51991.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1972.

In re: Claude E. Nichols applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 254 So.2d 159.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
#### OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, a California corporation, Appellant, v. GEORGIA SOUTHERN AND FLORIDA RAILWAY COMPANY, a Georgia corporation, Appellee.

No. R-282.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 6, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Motors Corporation (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G.
Richard Wagoner, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.


/s/ G. RICHARD WAGONER, JR.
---------------------------
G. Richard Wagoner, Jr.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
August 6, 2004



































                                       39
**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Ben Harper, Senior Vice President-Finance andSecretary/Treasurer of Friedman Industries, Incorporated, aTexas corporation, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Friedman Industries, Incorporated;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

          b) [intentionally omitted per SEC release 33-8238]

          c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

          d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

          a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: August 14, 2006 /s/  BEN HARPER Senior Vice President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Conley T. JONES.

No. 60167.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1977.

In re: Conley T. Jones applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order.

Writ denied. No error of law. Stay order recalled.
Union Calendar No. 115

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 734

[Report No. 103–204]

A BILL

To amend the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for

of Arizona, and for other purposes.’’.ices, and assistance to the Pascua Yaqui Indiansthe extension of certain Federal benefits, servAUGUST 2, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
IB

Union Calendar No. 115

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 734

[Report No. 103–204]

To amend the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the extension of certain

Federal benefits, services, and assistance to the Pascua Yaqui Indians

of Arizona, and for other purposes.’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1993

Mr. PASTOR (for himself, Mr. KOLBE, and Ms. ENGLISH of Arizona) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural

Resources

AUGUST 2, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To amend the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the extension of certain Federal benefits, services, and assistance

to the Pascua Yaqui Indians of Arizona, and for other

purposes.’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 734 RH

1 SECTION 1. SOVEREIGNTY OF PASCUA YAQUI TRIBE.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of the first section

3 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the extension

4 of certain Federal benefits, services, and assistance to the

5 Pascua Yaqui Indians of Arizona, and for other purposes’’

6 (25 U.S.C. 1300f(a)) is amended by inserting after the

7 first sentence the following: ‘‘The Pascua Yaqui Tribe, a

8 historic Indian tribe, is acknowledged as a federally recog9 nized Indian tribe possessing all the attributes of inherent

10 sovereignty which have not been specifically taken away

11 by Acts of Congress and which are not inconsistent with

12 such tribal status.’’.

13 (b) EXTENSION OF ENROLLMENT DEADLINE.—Sec14 tion 3 of such Act (25 U.S.C. 1300f–2) is amended—

15 (1) in paragraph (B) by striking ‘‘and’’; and

16 (2) by redesignating paragraph (C) as para17 graph (D) and inserting after paragraph (B) the fol18 lowing new paragraph (C):

19 ‘‘(C) all those persons of Yaqui blood who are

20 citizens of the United States and who, within three

21 years after the date of enactment of this paragraph,

22 apply for enrollment in the Pascua Yaqui Tribe pur23 suant to the membership criteria and procedures

24 provided for in the official governing documents of

25 the Pascua Yaqui Tribe; and’’.
|  |   |
|--|--------|

 

August 26, 2009

 

Vaughan Foods, Inc.

216 N.E. 12th Street

Moore, OK 73160

 

|   | Re: | Vaughan Foods, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-8 to be filed by Vaughan Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the proposed issuance of up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), pursuant to the terms of the Plan.

 

We have also examined the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws, the Plan, resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Company and such other Company records, instruments, certificates and documents as we considered necessary or appropriate to enable us to express this opinion.

 

Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the Common Stock has been duly authorized for issuance and, when issued and delivered in accordance with the Plan, will constitute validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable shares of the Company.

 

We consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement. 

 

Very truly yours,

 

/s/  McAFEE & TAFT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1556

MARK J. ADAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, a municipal corporation; PAUL GRAZIANO, in his capacity as Executive Director of the Housing Authority for Baltimore City, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-02- 1608-MJG) Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 16, 2002 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark J. Adams, Appellant Pro Se. William Fitts Ryan, Jr., WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland; Thurman Wilbert Zollicoffer, Jr., City Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Mark J. Adams appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil action based on lack of standing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Adams v. Mayor of Baltimore , No. CA-02-1608-MJG (D. Md. filed May 23, 2002 & entered May 24, 2002). We deny the Appellees’ motion for summary disposition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 31.1**I, WilliamE. Crow, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief OperatingOfficer of FriedmanIndustries, Incorporated, a Texas corporation, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Friedman Industries, Incorporated;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) [intentionally omitted per SEC release 33-8238]          c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: February 14, 2006     /s/ William E. Crow  Chief Executive Officer,  President and Chief Operating Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 901 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 901

    To ensure employee rights concerning the payment of union dues.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 1993

    Mr. Lewis of Florida (for himself, Mr. Baker of Louisiana, Mr. 
Rohrabacher, Mr. Goss, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Dornan, Mr. Hyde, 
and Mr. Oxley) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To ensure employee rights concerning the payment of union dues.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONTINUATION OF POLICY REGARDING NOTIFICATION OF EMPLOYEE 
              RIGHTS CONCERNING PAYMENT OF UNION DUES.

    Executive Order 12800 of April 13, 1992, and all Department of 
Labor directives and regulations regarding notification of employee 
rights concerning the payment of union dues, as in effect on January 1, 
1993, shall remain in effect unless changed by law.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8206 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8206

     To clarify the eligibility for participation of peer support 
specialists in the furnishing of behavioral health integration services 
                      under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 2020

  Ms. Judy Chu of California (for herself and Mr. Smith of Nebraska) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
    Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To clarify the eligibility for participation of peer support 
specialists in the furnishing of behavioral health integration services 
                      under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Promoting Effective and Empowering 
Recovery Services in Medicare Act of 2020'' or the ``PEERS Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFYING THE ELIGIBILITY FOR PARTICIPATION OF PEER SUPPORT 
              SPECIALISTS IN THE FURNISHING OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 
              INTEGRATION SERVICES UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Nothing in title XVIII of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) shall be construed as prohibiting a peer 
support specialist (as defined in subsection (b)) from participating in 
the furnishing of behavioral health integration services under such 
title under the supervision of a physician or other entity billing for 
such services under such title.
    (b) Peer Support Specialist Defined.--For purposes of subsection 
(a), the term ``peer support specialist'' means an individual who--
            (1) is recovering from a mental health or substance use 
        condition; and
            (2) is certified as qualified to furnish peer support 
        services under a certification process consistent with the 
        National Practice Guidelines for Peer Supporters and inclusive 
        of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
        Administration Core Competencies for Peer Workers in Behavioral 
        Health Settings (as established by the State in which such 
        individual furnishes such services or under such national 
        certification process determined appropriate by the Secretary 
        of Health and Human Services).
                                 <all>
```
.:i;PARTM£NTOF 

:'C:KET OPERATIONS 

mi FLC !b P 1: Ub 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

West Building Grand Floor 

Room W-120140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re Docket No. FAA 2012-0089 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

I am writing to request that Sun Country Airlines be allowed to keep their landing space at 

Reagan National Airport for their Minneapolis-Lansing-DC flight. My son works for the Federal 

government. The Delta flight from Detroit takes 8 hours door to door. The Sun Country flight: 

3 and Yi hours. The Sun Country flight makes more trips feasible for us to stay in close touch 

with each other. Please don't rescind their access to gates at Reagan. 

'Sincerely, 

0 / 

Linda Melaragni . 

j..j' • • ., • •• • • : ; : ••'': : •'• - • . i'^"' - •!!-: . ;''- ' •.••• • ^' - • t/ -
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Klever Marketing,  Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, William C. Bailey,
Chairman and Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    William C. Bailey _____
William C. Bailey
Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)




April 2, 2007


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

▲★

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Warren E. GAMBINO, Jr.

No. 60671.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 23, 1977.

In re: Warren E. Gambino, Jr. applying for supervisory writ.

Writ denied. There is no such irreparable injury shown as to justify the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction, save however, that defendant is entitled to return of all copies of the controverted publication except one copy may be returned by the state for evidentiary purpose.

DIXON, J.,

dissents, being of the opinion a prior judicial determination of “obscenity” is essential before an arrest, because of the vagueness of the term “ultimate sexual acts”.