alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8162 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8162

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2020

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To express the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Education should 
 provide certain waivers to community learning centers, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``21st Century Community Learning 
Centers Coronavirus Relief Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING FLEXIBLE USE OF SUBGRANT FUNDS.

    It is the sense of Congress that for school year 2020-2021, 
notwithstanding each provision in part B of title IV of the Elementary 
and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7171 et seq.) that 
requires activities under such part be carried out during nonschool 
hours or periods when school is not in session, the Secretary of 
Education should carry out the exceptions included in the notice 
entitled ``Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request; 
21st CCLC 4201(b)(1) Waiver Request'', published by the Department of 
Education in the Federal Register on September 3, 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 
55002), by providing that each eligible entity that is awarded a 
subgrant under section 4204 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 7174) for community 
learning centers may use such subgrant funds--
            (1) to carry out activities described in section 4205 of 
        such Act (20 U.S.C. 7175), regardless of whether such 
        activities are conducted in-person or virtually, or during 
        school hours or when school is in session; and
            (2) to provide in-person care during--
                    (A) the regular school day for students eligible to 
                receive services under part B of title IV of such Act 
                (20 U.S.C. 7171 et seq.); and
                    (B) a period in which full-time in-person 
                instruction is not available for all such students 
                served by such eligible entity.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 16, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 00-879.

#### Caso *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lloyd LINDINGER.

No. 60621.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 11, 1977.

In re: Lloyd Lindinger applying for a writ of certiorari, review, prohibition or mandamus.

*1209Granted. The petition of the relator m the above entitled and numbered ease having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Earl H. Edwards, Judge of the Twelfth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Avoyelles, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 25th day of November, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 29129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13389]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Fellowships: Biophysical, Physiological, Pharmacological and 
Bioengineering Neuroscience.
    Date: June 28, 2018.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites DC Convention Center, 900 10th Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20001.
    Contact Person: Sussan Paydar, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, RM 5222, Bethesda, MD 20817, (301) 827-4994, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2251575151434c0c52435b464350624c4b4a0c454d54"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="394a4c4a4a5857174958405d584b79575051175e564f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 18, 2018.
Sylvia L. Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-13389 Filed 6-21-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7564 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7564

To amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to require the Securities 
     and Exchange Commission to adopt data protection policies for 
 information the Commission receives from investment advisers, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2020

Mr. David Scott of Georgia (for himself and Mr. Loudermilk) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to require the Securities 
     and Exchange Commission to adopt data protection policies for 
 information the Commission receives from investment advisers, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SEC Data Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROCEDURE FOR DATA PROTECTION.

    Section 204 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-
4) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating the second subsection (d) (relating to 
        records of persons with custody or use) as subsection (e); and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Data Protection Policies.--Not later than 1 year after the 
date of enactment of this subsection, the Commission shall adopt, after 
notice and comment, policies and procedures reasonably designed to 
protect sensitive, nonpublic proprietary information, as determined by 
the Commission, that the Commission obtains or receives from an 
investment adviser subject to this section, from unlawful use or 
disclosure. Such policies and procedures shall--
            ``(1) address circumstances when the Commission requests 
        such proprietary information;
            ``(2) safeguard the information, taking into consideration 
        the level of sensitivity of the information;
            ``(3) limit access to the information to appropriate staff, 
        as determined by the Commission; and
            ``(4) protect the information from unlawful use or 
        disclosure.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 590 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 590

 To require that any request by the President for a declaration of war 
 include a cost/benefit statement, and to require that any declaration 
            of war by the Congress include such a statement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1993

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require that any request by the President for a declaration of war 
 include a cost/benefit statement, and to require that any declaration 
            of war by the Congress include such a statement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. PRESIDENTIAL REQUEST FOR DECLARATION OF WAR MUST INCLUDE 
              COST/BENEFIT STATEMENT.

    Whenever the President submits a request to the Congress for a 
declaration of war, the President shall include with that request a 
cost/benefit statement that shall identify areas of risk and 
uncertainty in terms of the cost in dollars as well as human misery and 
sorrow and describe them clearly so that the decision whether to 
declare war can be made with knowledge of the degree of reliability of 
the estimated benefits and costs and the effectiveness of alternate 
plans.

SEC. 2. DECLARATION OF WAR MUST INCLUDE COST/BENEFIT STATEMENT.

    Any declaration of war by the Congress shall include a cost/benefit 
statement that shall identify areas of risk and uncertainty in terms of 
the cost in dollars as well as human misery and sorrow and describe 
them clearly so that the decision to declare war is made with knowledge 
of the degree of reliability of the estimated benefits and costs and 
the effectiveness of alternate plans.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

            The undersigned who is a director or officer of NetMed, Inc., an
Ohio corporation (the "Company") does hereby constitute and appoint S. Trevor
Ferger and Kenneth B. Leachman to be his agents and attorneys-in-fact, each with
the power to act fully hereunder without the other and with full power of
substitution to act in the name and on behalf of the undersigned:

     -    To sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission the
          Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB, and any amendments or
          supplements to such Annual Report; and

     -    To execute and deliver any instruments, certificates or other
          documents which they shall deem necessary or proper in connection with
          the filing of such Annual Report, and generally to act for and in the
          name of the undersigned with respect to such filings as fully as could
          the undersigned if then personally present and acting.

            Each agent named above is hereby empowered to determine in his
discretion the times when, the purposes for, and the names in which, any power
conferred upon him herein shall be exercised and the terms and conditions of any
instrument, certificate or document which may be executed by him pursuant to
this instrument.

            This Power of Attorney shall not be affected by the disability of
the undersigned or the lapse of time.

            The validity, terms and enforcement of this Power of Attorney shall
be governed by those laws of the State of Ohio that apply to instruments
negotiated, executed, delivered and performed solely within the State of Ohio.

            This Power of Attorney may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall have the same effect as if it were the
original instrument and all of which shall constitute one and the same
instrument.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney this 26th day of
March, 2001.


         Signature                                   Title


              /s/ Kenneth B. Leachman                Vice President - Finance
-------------------------------------------------
              Kenneth B. Leachman                    Treasurer


              /s/ Cecil J. Petitti                   Director
-------------------------------------------------
              Cecil J. Petitti


              /s/ James F. Zid                       Director
-------------------------------------------------
              James F. Zid

<PAGE>   2


              /s/ Michael S. Blue                    Director
-------------------------------------------------
              Michael S. Blue


              /s/ Robert J. Massey                   Director
-------------------------------------------------
              Robert J. Massey


             /s/ Susan M. O'toole                    Director
-------------------------------------------------
             Susan M. O'toole
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Johnny E. HALL, Appellee.

No. 70-808.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, St. Lucie County; Wallace Sample, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Federal Trade Commission

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Bureau of Consumer Protection

Division of Privacy and Identity Protection

April 17, 2023

Via Electronic Mail (lbrett@bbbnp.org)

Laura Brett, Esq.

Vice President

National Advertising Division

112 Madison Avenue, 3rd Floor

New York, NY 10016

Re: Advertising for Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Dear Ms. Brett:

We have reviewed the National Advertising Division’s referral of Palo Alto Network’s 

challenge regarding advertising by Zscaler, Inc. (“Zscaler”) for its Zero Trust Exchange 

Platform. In your November 30, 2022, referral letter, you advised us that Zscaler raised only 

jurisdictional arguments in its initial response to the challenge, and then declined to further

participate in the NAD process. NAD issued a decision finding that it did have jurisdiction over 

the matter and that Zscaler’s challenged claims were not substantiated. You then referred this

matter to the Federal Trade Commission for our review.

Upon careful review of this referral, we have determined not to take additional action at

this time. In reaching this conclusion, we considered a number of factors including resource

allocation and enforcement priorities, the nature of any FTC Act violation, and the type and

severity of any consumer injury.

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/
Laura Brett, Esq.

April 17, 2023

Page 2

The staff’s decision to forego a formal investigation at this time is not to be construed as

a determination that a violation may not have occurred, just as the pendency of an investigation

should not be construed as a determination that a violation has occurred. The Commission

reserves the right to take such further action as the public interest may require. The Commission 

appreciates your referral and the opportunity to continue to assist in supporting the NAD.

Sincerely,

Benjamin Wiseman

Acting Associate Director

Division of Privacy and Identity Protection
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Binding Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2004, (the "Report"), I, DonCivgin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Damien
      R. Tanaka, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Aduromed
      Industries, Inc., (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, of the Company for the six month period ended
      June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
      or
      15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      August 14, 2007








/s/
      Damien R. Tanaka


Damien
        R.
        Tanaka


Chairman
      of the Board,


President
      and


Chief
      Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

RAY SHORT,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-30224

D.C. No. 4:14-cr-00273-BLW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 26, 2016** 

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Ray Short appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 180-

month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted sexual

exploitation of a minor child, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

AUG 02 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Short contends that his mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years violates

the Eighth Amendment because it is cruel and unusual punishment. He argues

that, given his age, poor health, and life expectancy, the 15-year sentence is

effectively a life sentence, which is disproportionate to his offense. We review de

novo. See United States v. Shill, 740 F.3d 1347, 1355 (9th Cir. 2014). Short’s

contention lacks merit because the sentence is not grossly disproportionate to the

conduct underlying the offense. See id. (a sentence violates the Eighth

Amendment when it is grossly disproportionate to the crime).

AFFIRMED.

2 15-30224
Hello, my name is Annie Ekblad and I am speaking to support the EPA's Clean Power

Plan. I am here as a concerned citizen of Colorado and the United States, but most of all I am here as a mother. When we talk about climate change, a lot of the time the dialog is focused on what kind of world we will be leaving our children and grandchildren, and this is important. We also need to focus on the effects climate change is having right now, as it is a view to the uncertain future we face without strong regulations on carbon pollution.

In September of 2013, Northern Colorado, where I make my home, was ravaged by flooding. Prior to the floods, we had been in a state of drought, and when the equivalent of an entire year's worth of precipitation fell in a matter of days, it caused over one billion dollars in damage to homes, businesses and infrastructure, as well as taking the lives of 8 people. This kind of extreme weather used to be called "100 year" floods, but without curbing carbon pollution, they will become "once a mortgage events." Is this the

kind of uncertain future we want to hand off to our children?

This is my son, Lex. He's three years old and is the greatest joy I have in my life. However, that joy gets dampened when I think about what his world, what our world, might look like in, 15, 20 or 30 years. I am gravely concerned. Clean air to breathe, a livable climate — these are things that we take for granted every day, but they are things that we need to work hard to protect. They are things that every child, every person on this planet is entitled to, and we're not going to have them unless we take serious action NOW to address carbon pollution.

Curbing carbon pollution requires immediate and sustained action. Carbon pollution from power plants is the largest single source of carbon dioxide emissions. Those who would oppose these common sense standards included in the EPA Clean Power Plant need to explain why they support no limits at all for power plants for this kind of pollution. Wouldn't we all agree that unlimited pollution is bad for everyone? We have the technology to move forward with a clean energy future — we just need to leave this kind of dirty, polluting energy in our past.

Carbon pollution harms us all our health, our economy and our way of life: air pollution and the asthma it causes, the loss of property from wildfires exacerbated from drought, as saw in Colorado Springs in 2013, and the increased food prices that we will see as food crop yields decline due to extreme temperatures. Climate change paints a very frightening picture of our possible future, but we can still mitigate its worst effects. The EPA's Clean Power Plan is an important first step in addressing climate change — but it needs to be stronger. That's why I'm asking that the EPA strengthens the Clean Power Plan and finalizes a rule that reduces carbon dioxide emissions 40% below 2005 levels by 2020.

Thank you for taking the time to listen to my testimony. I appreciate the opportunity to speak up for me and my family.Annie Ekblad, 8103 Lighthouse Lane, Windsor Co 80528 970-481-3184,

zeanner@gmail.com

===
#### BIBLE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY, trading as Tempaco, Industrial Tempaco Dean, and Dean Supply, a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 72-582.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 21, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 23, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.