48994 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 160 / Tuesday, August 19, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

Presidio Trust, where dog walking is 

otherwise allowed, is hereby authorized 

provided that: 

(1) That person has a valid 

commercial dog walking permit issued 

by the Golden Gate National Recreation 

Area (GGNRA); 

(2) The walking of more than three 

dogs, with a limit of six dogs, is done 

pursuant to the conditions of that 

permit; and 

(3) The commercial dog walker badge 

issued to the permittee by the GGNRA 

shall be visibly displayed at all times as 

directed in the permit while the 

permittee is engaging in commercial dog 

walking activities, and shall be provided 

upon request to any person authorized 

to enforce this provision. 

Dated: August 11, 2014. 

Karen A. Cook, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2014–19514 Filed 8–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–4R–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2014–0290; FRL–9915–28- 

Region 7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; State of 

Missouri; Infrastructure SIP 

Requirements for the 2008 Lead 

National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

approve a revision to the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State 

of Missouri addressing the applicable 

requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA) 

section 110 for the 2008 National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS) for Lead (Pb). Section 110 

requires that each state adopt and 

submit a SIP to support implementation, 

maintenance, and enforcement of each 

new or revised NAAQS promulgated by 

EPA. These SIPs are commonly referred 

to as ‘‘infrastructure’’ SIPs. The 

infrastructure requirements are designed 

to ensure that the structural components 

of each state’s air quality management 

program are adequate to meet the state’s 

responsibilities under the CAA. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

September 18, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R07–OAR–2014–0290. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., CBI or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Air Planning and Development Branch, 

11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, 

Kansas 66219. The Regional Office’s 

official hours of business are Monday 

through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30 excluding 

Federal holidays. The interested persons 

wanting to examine these documents 

should make an appointment with the 

office at least 24 hours in advance. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amy Bhesania, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, 11201 Renner 

Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 

913–551–7147, or by email at 

bhesania.amy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ 

‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. On June 4, 

2014 (79 FR 32200), EPA published a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for 

the State of Missouri. The NPR 

proposed approval of Missouri’s 

submittal that provides the basic 

elements specified in section 110(a)(2) 

of the CAA, or portions thereof, 

necessary to implement, maintain, and 

enforce the 2008 Pb NAAQS. 

II. Summary of SIP Revision 

On December 20, 2011, EPA received 

a SIP revision from the Missouri 

Department of Natural Resources that 

addresses the infrastructure elements 

specified in section 110(a)(2) of the 

CAA, necessary to implement, maintain 

and enforce the 2008 Pb NAAQS. This 

submittal addressed the following 

infrastructure elements of section 

110(a)(2): (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), 

(H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). Specific 

requirements of section 110(a)(2) of the 

CAA and the rationale for EPA’s 

proposed action to approve the SIP 

submittal are explained in the NPR and 

will not be restated here. No public 

comments were received on the NPR. 

III. Final Action 

EPA is approving Missouri’s submittal 

which provides the basic program 

elements specified in section 

110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), 

(H), (J), (K), (L), and (M) of the CAA, or 

portions thereof, necessary to 

implement, maintain, and enforce the 

2008 Pb NAAQS, as a revision to the 

Missouri SIP. This action is being taken 

under section 110 of the CAA. As 

discussed in each applicable section of 

NPR, EPA is not acting on section 

110(a)(2)(I)—Nonattainment Area Plan 

or Plan Revisions Under Part D and on 

the visibility protection portion of 

section 110(a)(2)(J). 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under the terms of Executive 

Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 

1993) and is therefore not subject to 

review under Executive Orders 12866 

and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 

2011). 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 160 / Tuesday, August 19, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 48995 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by October 20, 2014. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: August 7, 2014. 

Karl Brooks, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the Environmental Protection 

Agency is amending 40 CFR part 52 as 

set forth below: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart AA—Missouri 

■ 2. In § 52.1320(e) the table is amended 

by adding new entry (61) in numerical 

order at the end of the table to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.1320 Identification of Plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI NONREGULATORY SIP PROVISIONS

Name of non-regulatory 

SIP provision 

Applicable geographic or nonattainment area 

State 

submittal date EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

(61) Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 

Pb NAAQS.

Statewide ........ 12/20/2011 08/19/2014 [insert Federal Register citation].This action addresses the following CAA elements: 

110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), 

(F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and 

(M). 

[FR Doc. 2014–19536 Filed 8–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0439; FRL–9914–75- 

Region–9] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Placer County 

Air Pollution Control District, Negative 

Declarations 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to approve revisions to the Placer 

County Air Pollution Control District 

(PCAPCD) portion of the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions concern negative declarations 

for volatile organic compound (VOC) 

source categories for the PCAPCD. We 

are approving these negative 

declarations under the Clean Air Act as 

amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). 

DATES: This rule is effective on October 

20, 2014 without further notice, unless 

EPA receives adverse comments by 

September 18, 2014. If we receive such 

comments, we will publish a timely 

withdrawal in the Federal Register to 

notify the public that this direct final 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number EPA–R09– 

OAR–2014–0439, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through 

www.regulations.gov or email. 

www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send email 

directly to EPA, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the public comment. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES