alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.6


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              [CERTIFICATE OF SHARES]

        COMMON STOCK                                    COMMON STOCK
           NUMBER                                          SHARES
        [           ]                                   [          ]

 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS
  OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE                   SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

THIS CERTIFICATE TRANSFERABLE IN
  CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA OR
      NEW YORK, NEW YORK
                             Health Plan Services
                                  CORPORATION         CUSIP 72701P 10 5

This Certifies that


is the owner of

 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK PAR VALUE $.01 PER
                                   SHARE OF


Health Plan Services Corporation transferable on the books of the Corporation
for the holder's hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender
of this Certificate properly endorsed.

This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and
registered by the Registrar.

In Witness Whereof, the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers.

                Name Has Been Changed To PlanVista Corporation

Dated:

COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
  FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA
     (Charlotte, North Carolina)                TRANSFER AGENT
                                                 AND REGISTRAR

                                                            AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

Phillip S. Dingle            William L. Bennett             James K. Murray, Jr.

    SECRETARY                     CHAIRMAN                       PRESIDENT

                   [HEALTH PLAN SERVICES CORPORATION SEAL]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7970 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

183 San Geronimo Valley Drive in Woodacre, California, as the ‘‘Marylu 

Giddings Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 7, 2020 

Mr. HUFFMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 183 San Geronimo Valley Drive in Woodacre, 

California, as the ‘‘Marylu Giddings Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MARYLU GIDDINGS POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 183 San Geronimo Valley Drive 

6 in Woodacre, California, shall be known and designated 

7 as the ‘‘Marylu Giddings Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7970 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Marylu Giddings Post 

3 Office’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
No. 10451.

#### Drew *v.*White et al.

Decided June 23, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Hocking county.

*Mr. John C. Pettit,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Edzvin D. Ricketts*and’ *Mr. S. H.' Bright,*for defendants in error.

Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction to consider all errors assigned.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### Ella Scott TOM, Executrix of the Estate of Nylah T. Bell, Deceased, Petitioner, v. Bruce MESSINGER, etc., et al., Respondents. Ella Scott TOM, Executrix of the Estate of Nylah T. Bell, Deceased, Petitioner, v. Jay MESSINGER et al., Respondents.

No. 39806.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 29, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 235 So.2d 333.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7278

MCKINLEY DAVID LITTLEJOHN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LARRY MOODY, Safety Manager; MIKE GIBBS, Electric Foreman; CHUCK LLOYD, Counselor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-04-330-2) Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 29, 2005 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. McKinley David Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se. Anita K. Henry, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: McKinley Littlejohn, a federal inmate, appeals a district court order dismissing his complaint alleging that three prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his health and safety. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and find Littlejohn failed to state a claim of deliberate indifference. See Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Richard E. GARNER v. L. L. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 38764.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Aug. 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: ROSA SERRANO,

INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A

THE LENS FACTORY,

 Relator.

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-15-00284-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The court has considered this cause on the Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus 

against the Honorable Virgil Mulanax, Judge of the County Court at Law No. 7 of El Paso 

County, Texas, and concludes that Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. 

We therefore deny the petition for writ of mandamus and Relator’s motion for emergency relief, 

in accordance with the opinion of this court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

(Hughes, J., not participating)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 791 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 791

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 5 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse in Benton, Illinois, as the 
             ``James L. Foreman United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 301 West Main Street in 
Benton, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ``James L. 
Foreman United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, map, regulation, document, paper, or 
other record of the United States to the courthouse referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James L. Foreman 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1993.

            Attest:

                                           DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Calendar No. 144

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 843

[Report No. 103–100]

AN ACT

To withdraw certain lands located in the Coronado

purposes.leasing laws of the United States, and for otherNational Forest from the mining and mineral

JULY 20 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Reported without amendment
II

Calendar No. 144

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 843

[Report No. 103–100]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 13 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

JULY 20 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Reported by Mr. JOHNSTON, without amendment

AN ACT

To withdraw certain lands located in the Coronado National

Forest from the mining and mineral leasing laws of

the United States, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cave Creek Canyon

5 Protection Act of 1993’’.
2

HR 843 RS

1 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF LANDS WITHIN CAVE CREEK CAN2 YON DRAINAGE.

3 (a) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights,

4 after the date of enactment of this Act lands within the

5 Cave Creek Canyon Drainage are withdrawn from entry,

6 location, or patent under the general mining laws, the op7 eration of the mineral and geothermal leasing laws and

8 the mineral material disposal laws.

9 (b) DEFINITION.—For the purposes of this Act, the

10 term ‘‘Cave Creek Canyon Drainage’’ means lands and in11 terest in lands owned by the United States within the area

12 depicted on the map of record entitled ‘‘Cave Creek Min13 eral Withdrawal’’, dated November 1, 1991. The map

14 shall be on file and available for public inspection in the

15 offices of the Forest Service, Department of Agriculture.

Passed the House of Representatives May 11, 1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
261 La. 1054

#### LAMASTUS & ASSOCIATES, INC. and Maryland Casualty Company v. GULF INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 52449.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 23, 1972.

In re: Lamastus and Associates, Inc., and Maryland Casualty Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 260 So.2d 83.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the court of appeal the result is substantially correct and does not warrant the exercise of our review jurisdiction.
EXHIBIT 24
                               
                               
                       POWER OF ATTORNEY
                               


     I, the undersigned, hereby constitute and appoint DENISE
K. GUTSTEIN as my true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact to
act with full power and authority and in my name, place and
stead as I, myself, could act for the sole purpose of executing
the Form 10-K of Rochester Telephone Corp. for the year ended
December 31, 1996, pursuant to Instruction D(2)(a) of the Form
10-K and in accordance with Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(24) of
the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and with full and unqualified authority to delegate such
power to any person or persons as my attorney-in-fact shall
select.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THIS INSTRUMENT HAS BEEN SIGNED AND
DELIVERED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS OF MARCH 17, 1997.


                            
                            /s/ Harlan D. Calkins
                                ------------------
                                Harlan D. Calkins
                            
                            /s/ Katherine M. Clark
                                ------------------
                                Katherine M. Clark

                            /s/ Maurice F. Holmes
                                ------------------
                                Maurice F. Holmes

                            /s/ Thomas H. Jackson
                                ------------------
                                Thomas H. Jackson

                            /s/ Robert Johnson
                                ------------------
                                Robert Johnson
                            
                            /s/ Richard P. Miller, Jr.
                                ------------------
                                Richard P. Miller, Jr.

                            /s/ Christine B. Whitman
                                ------------------
                                Christine B. Whitman
#### Joe Nathan MASSEY v. L. L. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 38983.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED ELSEWHERE IN THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-1999
<CASH>                                             911
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,616
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,613
<INVENTORY>                                     83,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               155,992
<PP&E>                                         353,620
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 546,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,435
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,260
<OTHER-SE>                                     234,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   546,513
<SALES>                                        134,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,960
<CGS>                                           76,894
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  115,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (573)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   766
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,886
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,893
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,310
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,583
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,583
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47


</TABLE>
JERRY NEIL ALFRED,

Appellant,

v.

STEPHEN K. ENFINGER,

MARK DELAVEGA, AND 

PETER REYES,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3560

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 15, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

Jerry N. Alfred, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Lisa Kuhlman Tietig and Kathleen C. Hagan, 

Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 4.5

AMENDMENT to the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT entered into on October 20, 1993 between
FRISCO BAY INDUSTRIES LTD. (the "Company"), and RONALD G. WAXMAN (the
"Employee").

WHEREAS Section 4.1 of the Agreement provides as follows:

      "If the Employee shall die during the Term, this Agreement shall
      terminate, except that the Employee's widow (if she is then alive) shall
      be entitled to receive as a death benefit the annual compensation paid to
      the Employee during the fiscal year of the Company immediately preceding
      such death, for a period of three (3) years from the date of such death to
      be paid in equal, bi-weekly installments."

WHEREAS it is opportune to replace this Section 4.1 in its entirety with the
following:

      "If the Employee shall die during the Term, this Agreement shall
      terminate, except that the Employee's widow shall be entitled to receive
      as a death benefit the annual compensation paid to the Employee during the
      fiscal year of the Company immediately preceding such death, (the
      "Benefit") for a period of three (3) years from the date of such death to
      be paid in equal, bi-weekly installments (the "Payment Period"). If at the
      time of the Employee's death the Employee's wife is also deceased the
      Benefit shall be paid to the children of the Employee in equal shares. If
      the Employee's wife shall die during the Payment Period the Benefit shall
      continue to be paid to the children of the Employee in equal shares."

THEREFORE the parties hereto agree to amend the Employment Agreement entered
into on October 20, 1993 and to replace Section 4.1 as above.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Amendment to the Employment
Agreement on this 25 day of June 1996.



FRISCO BAY INDUSTRIES LTD.               RONALD G. WAXMAN

/s/ Barry Katsof                         /s/ Ronald G. Waxman
------------------------------------     ------------------------------------
per:
| (1)  | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                       |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. |

| November 1, 2013                       |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |   |
|                                   |   |
| /s/ Keith S. Sherin                    |   |
| Keith S. SherinChief Executive Officer |   |
|                                   |   |
| /s/ Robert C. Green                    |   |
| Robert C. GreenChief Financial Officer |   |
263 La. 983

#### Ronald L. KENNEDY v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 53008.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 21, 1972.

In re: Ronald L. Kennedy applying for remedial writ and writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The conclusion of the trial judge on the evidentiary hearing is correct.
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 808

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 22 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

For the relief of James B. Stanley.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.

4 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall

5 pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise ap6 propriated, $400,577 to James B. Stanley.

7 (b) BASIS.—The payment required by subsection (a)

8 shall be to compensate James B. Stanley for the physical,

9 psychological, and economic injuries sustained by him as

10 a result of the administration to him, without his knowl11 edge, of lysergic acid diethylamide by United States Army

12 personnel in 1958.
2

•HR 808 RFS

1 SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

2 The payment made pursuant to section 1(a) shall be

3 in full satisfaction of all claims James B. Stanley may

4 have against the United States for—

5 (1) the injuries received by him as described in

6 section 1; and

7 (2) for any injuries received by him subsequent

8 to his discharge from the United States Army that

9 are the result of the injuries described in section 1.

10 SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.

11 James B. Stanley shall not be eligible for any com12 pensation or benefits from the Department of Veterans

13 Affairs or the Department of Defense for any injury re14 ceived by him as described in section 1.

15 SEC. 4. LIMITATION OF ATTORNEYS’ OR AGENTS’ FEES.

16 It shall be unlawful for an amount of more than 10

17 per centum of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to

18 be paid to or received by any attorney or agent of James

19 B. Stanley for any service rendered in connection with the

20 payment made by this Act. Any person who violates this

21 section shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be subject
3

•HR 808 RFS

1 to a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United States

2 Code.

Passed the House of Representatives September 21,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.,
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




<PAGE>
                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Coastal Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

We consent to  incorporation  by reference  in the  registration  statements No.
333-1274  and  333-01274  on  Form  S-8 of  Coastal  Financial  Corporation  and
Subsidiaries  (the  "Company")  of our report dated October 17, 1997 relating to
the  consolidated  statements  of  financial  condition  of  the  Company  as of
September  30,  1997  and  1996,  and the  related  consolidated  statements  of
operations,  stockholders'  equity  and cash  flows for each of the years in the
three-year  period  ended  September  30,  1997,  which  report  appears  in the
September 30, 1997, annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.


                                                        /s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                                        ------------------------
                                                           KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Greenville, South Carolina
December 26, 1997