alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, John C. Harris, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief
Financial Officer, of Viseon, Inc., certify that:


     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Viseon ,Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
          statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the period covered by this annual report; and

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
          information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
          material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
          cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
          this annual report.

     Date: August 13, 2004.                     /s/ John C. Harris
                                                --------------------------------
                                                John C. Harris
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel Wilson, Also Known as Angel Rodriguez, Appellant.

[735 NYS2d 257]

Crew III, J.P.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Eidens, J.), rendered January 18, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree (two counts), gang assault in the first degree, criminal solicitation in the first degree, criminal solicitation in the second degree, conspiracy in the first degree, conspiracy in the second degree, conspiracy in the fourth degree, robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree (two counts), hindering prosecution in the first degree (two counts), tampering with physical evidence (three counts), attempted murder in the second degree and burglary in the first degree (two counts).

On May 3, 1999, defendant broke into the home of Ian Neish and stabbed him repeatedly in both the back and chest resulting in grievous injury. Thereafter, on May 26, 1999, defendant brutally murdered Francisco Rosa in Central Park, in the City and County of Schenectady, by repeatedly stabbing and thereafter beating him with the stock of a BE gun. As a consequence, defendant was charged in a 22-count indictment with, inter alia, the crimes of murder in the second degree and attempted murder in the second degree. He thereafter pleaded guilty to *590all counts of the indictment except the second count and, in doing so, waived his right to appeal. Defendant was sentenced to an aggregate prison term of 48 years to life.

Initially, we note that defendant’s argument that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel has been waived by his knowing, intelligent and voluntary guilty plea *(see, People v Corwin,*137 AD2d 872, 873, *lv denied*71 NY2d 1025). To be sure, as defendant contends, a waiver of appeal will not foreclose a challenge to the competency of counsel where the claimed ineffectiveness induced the otherwise knowing and voluntary guilty plea *(see, People v Ferguson,*192 AD2d 800, *lv denied*82 NY2d 717), but the record reveals no basis upon which to believe that such was the case here. Quite to the contrary, given the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, pleading guilty, with the hope of avoiding a maximum sentence, certainly was a reasonable course of action. Finally, defendant’s contention that his sentence was harsh and excessive is encompassed by his waiver of his right to appeal. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Peters, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
#### Bobby Joe BASSHAM v. STATE.

No. 37488.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 209 So.2d 477.
#### Freddie M. HARRIS and Margaret L. Harris, his wife, Petitioners, v. Leo DIKMAN, Respondent.

No. 39874.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 29, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 29, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 235 So.2d 529.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
| (1)   | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 28, 2011 | By:    | /s/  Cheryl K. Sadowski             |   |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Cheryl K. Sadowski                                      |   |
|                 |   | Principal Accounting OfficerMedClean Technologies, Inc. |   |

----
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Multi-Media Tutorial Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended February 29, 2004 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Barry Reichman, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
certify that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
materially respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of
the dates presented and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the
period presented.

Date: June 1, 2004
                                        By: /s/ Barry Reichman
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Chief Executive Officer,
                                            Chief Financial Officer and Director

This certificate has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
#### Harry Truman RAFUSE v. STATE.

No. 37998.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 215 So.2d 71.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 14, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-1457 Lower Tribunal No. F85-22623A

________________ 

### Willie Lee Harper, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton Hirsch, Judge. Willie Lee Harper, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMAS, SCALES and HENDON, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(b) (providing: “No motion [for correction of credit for time spent in the county jail before sentencing] shall be filed or considered pursuant to this rule if filed more than 1 year after the sentence becomes final.”)
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the Cascade
Bancorp 2002 Equity Incentive Plan of our reports dated March 5, 2008, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Cascade Bancorp and
subsidiary (collectively, Cascade Bancorp) and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of Cascade Bancorp included in Cascade
Bancorps Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ Symonds, Evans & Company, P.C.

Portland, OregonMarch 5, 2008

---
#### Marjorie VAN BRACKLE, Appellant, v. Henry R. VAN BRACKLE, Appellee.

No. 70-1058.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Richard H. Cooper, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 31

                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302

I, Thomas A. Chandler, certify that:

    1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of National City Credit Card
Master Trust;

    2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

    3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing,
or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these
reports;

    4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my
knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under that agreement; and

    5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
    provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Bank of New York.

Date: March 15, 2004                 By:
                                     /s/ Thomas A. Chandler
                                     -------------------------------
                                     Thomas A. Chandler
                                     Senior Vice President - Credit Card Finance
                                     National City Bank
#### Louis MAJESTY et al. v. COMET-MERCURY-FORD COMPANY OF LORAIN, MICHIGAN.

No. 54267.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 25, 1974.

In re: Louis Majesty, et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans, 285 So.2d 314.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                            CYRK, INC. SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Name of Subsidiary             Jurisdiction of Incorporation  Ownership
------------------             -----------------------------  ---------
<S>                            <C>                            <C>

Cyrk Europe Limited            United Kingdom                 100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Super Premium Limited          British Virgin Islands         100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk Far East, Inc.            British Virgin Islands         100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk (H.K.) Limited            Hong Kong                      100% owned by Cyrk Far East, Inc.
Cyrk Marketing Services, Inc.  Canada                         100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk Acquisition Corp.         Delaware                       100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
CXDATA, Inc.                   Delaware                       100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Global Sourcing and
 Risk Group, Inc.              Delaware                       100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk/Tonkin Europe LTD         United Kingdom                 100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Tonkin, Inc.                   Delaware                       100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk CPG Corp.                 Delaware                       100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Creative Premium
 Manufacturing, Inc.           Delaware                       100% owned by Cyrk CPG Corp.
Loyalty Management, Inc.       Delaware                       100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
NewModel, Inc.                 Delaware                       100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Simon Marketing, Inc.          Delaware                       100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Simon Marketing (Hong Kong) 
 Limited                       Hong Kong                      100% owned by Simon Marketing, Inc.
Simon Ventures, Inc.           California                     100% owned by Simon Marketing, Inc.
Simon Marketing Consulting
 (Canada) Limited              Canada                         100% owned by Simon Ventures, Inc.
Simon Marketing
 International GmbH            Germany                        100% owned by Simon Ventures International LTD
Simon Marketing
 International Limited         United Kingdom                 100% owned by Simon Marketing International GmbH
Simon Marketing International
 Services Limited              United Kingdom                 100% owned by Simon Ventures International LTD
Simon Marketing-California,
 Inc.                          California                     100% owned by Simon Marketing, Inc.
Simon Marketing 
 Entertainment, Inc.           California                     100% owned by Simon Marketing, Inc.
Simon Marketing
 Incentives, Inc.              California                     100% owned by Simon Marketing, Inc.
Simon Marketing East Limited   Hong Kong                      100% owned by Simon Marketing (H.K.) LTD
Simon Ventures 
 International Limited         United Kingdom                 100% owned by Simon Ventures, Inc.

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Neil R. WROBLEUSKI, Relator, v. Honorable Ralph FERGUSON, Judge, Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, Criminal Division, Respondent.

No. 73-1.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 2, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition dismissed.
#### MARGATE HEALTH CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. Dr. Channing FOX et al., Appellees.

No. 72-497.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 26, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Olga TIRADO, Appellant, v. Hans J. MANGIN, Appellee.

No. 70-1124.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 3, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Corporation for National and Community Service

# AGENCY:

Corporation for National and Community Service.

# ACTION:

Request for preliminary public input; Notification of listening sessions; Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Corporation for National and Community Service published a Notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         of June 19, 2018, concerning listening sessions to solicit comments regarding its Transformation and Sustainability Plan. The document contained an incorrect date.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Neill Minish, Special Initiatives Advisor, Corporation for National and Community Service, 250 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20525. Phone: 202-606-6664. Email:                         *nminish@cns.gov.*

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of June 19, 2018, in FR Doc. 2018-13087, on page 28415, in the first column, correct the second listening session to read as follows:                    

2. June 26, 2018, New Orleans, LA.

Dated: June 20, 2018.

Brian Finch,

Director of Business Transformation.

[FR Doc. 2018-13588 Filed 6-21-18; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 6050-28-P
-  About 
            -  What GAO Does 
            -  U.S. Comptroller General                -  Biography 
              -  Testimonies                  -  2023 Testimonies 
                -  2022 Testimonies 
                -  2021 Testimonies 
                -  2020 and Older Testimonies 
              -  Presentations 
              -  Forums & Roundtables 
              -  Speech Requests 
            -  Careers 
            -  Contact Us 

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

GAO

#### A Century of Strategic Evolution to Meet Congressional Needs

Government Efficiency and Effectiveness

#### Opportunities to Reduce Fragmentation, Overlap, and Duplication and Achieve Billions in Financial Benefits

Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Request

#### U.S. Government Accountability Office

Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Request

#### U.S. Government Accountability Office

High-Risk Series

#### Dedicated Leadership Needed to Address Limited Progress in Most High-Risk Areas

High-Risk Series

#### Dedicated Leadership Needed to Address Limited Progress in Most High-Risk Areas
# ORIGINAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 06-0422 IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF PAULA M. STANNARD ORDER Paula M. Stannard has petitioned the Court to waive the three-year test requirement for the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) for purposes of Stannard' application for admission by motion to the State Bar of Montana. By rule, applicants for admission by motion must provide evidence of the requisite score on an MPREtaken "within threeyearsprecedingthe dateofthe application for admission." Rule VII.A.9, Rules ofAdmission. Stannard passed the MPRE in 1991 when seeking admission to the practice oflaw in Illinoi,. The petition states that Stannard has been practicing law for over 25 years and at no time has Petitioner faced "any disciplinary or ethical issues." Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Paul M. Stannard to waive the three-year test requirement forthe MPRE for purposes ofStannard' current application for admission by motion to the State Bar ofMontana is GRANTED. The Clerk shall mail a copy ofthis order to Petitioner and to the Administrator of the Board ofBar Examiners at the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this —day ofNovember, 2022.

ChiefJustice

11 -3 l'.41111 cm, 

### NOV 0 1 2022 Bowen Greenwood CI_,rk of Supreme Court stw.to of IVIootane 

# oga 11/01/2022

Case Number: PR 06-0422

# xi AIL. Justices
#### Rena FRUGE et vir, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2795.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.

Aug. 7, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 26, 1969.

Scofield, Cox & Bergstedt, by James J. Cox, Lake Charles, and Raleigh Newman, Lake Charles, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Hall, Raggio, Farrar & Barnett, by Thomas L. Raggio, Lake Charles, for defendant-appellee, Aetna.

Plauché & Plauché, by Reid K. Hebert, Lake Charles, for defendant-appellee, Continental Ins.

Camp, Carmouche, Palmer, Carwile & Barsh, by Harry Barsh, Lake Charles, for defendant-appellee.

Before TATE, FRUGÉ, and CULPEP-PER, JJ.

TATE, Judge.

This is an appeal from summary judgments upholding policy defenses and dismissing three insurers from this tort suit. This proceeding arises out of the same accident and involves the same issues as those decided in a companion appeal this day decided, Mrs. John A. Fontenot v. Aetna Insurance Co., 225 So.2d 648.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion in that companion appeal, we affirm the surance Company, but we reverse the sum-summary judgment dismissing Allstate In-mary judgments dismissing the Aetna Insurance Company and the Continental Casualty Company. The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed. The costs of this appeal are to be paid by Aetna and Continental; all other costs to await final disposition of these proceedings.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.