alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Viseon, Inc.
                    545 E. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 1430
                                Irving, TX 75062
December 18, 2002

John O'Donnell
Chairman and CEO
Comlink Management Services, Inc.
1500 Fairway, #1201
Lewisville, TX 75057

Dear John,

This letter is intended to memorialize our agreement regarding the sale of
Viseon's existing service business and service contracts to Comlink. Comlink
shall purchase the account list and assume the service liabilities of certain
accounts currently serviced by Viseon. A list of the accounts purchased by
Comlink is attached as Exhibit A and is hereinafter referred to as the Purchased
Accounts.

Comlink shall have the exclusive right to prospect the Purchased Accounts for
future group video conferencing equipment sales. Viseon shall not provide or
sell the list of Purchased Accounts to any other person or entity nor attempt to
sell new Group Video Conferencing equipment to the Purchased Accounts either
directly or indirectly. Viseon reserves the right to continue to sell Personal
Video Conferencing products to the Purchased Accounts as well as the exclusive
right to sell Group and Personal Video Conferencing products to accounts on
Exhibit B hereinafter referred to as the Excluded Accounts. Comlink shall not
attempt to sell equipment of any type to the Excluded Accounts.

Personal Video Conferencing products shall be defined as hardware based video
conferencing systems having a retail price of less than $1500.00 (fifteen
hundred dollars, U.S.). Group Video Conferencing systems shall be defined as
video conferencing hardware and software products having a retail price in
excess of $1500.00 (fifteen hundred dollars).

Comlink shall provide services and support for the Purchased Accounts to the
standards provided by Viseon to the Purchased Accounts in the past and pursuant
to the various service contracts signed with Viseon by each customer. Viseon
shall have no obligation to Comlink whatsoever in conjunction with the provision
of services and support of any kind. Viseon agrees to assign to Comlink any
rights it may have as to warranty claims with the vendors of the original
equipment or with the original equipment manufacturers of equipment provided to
customers on Exhibit A.

Comlink shall pay Viseon One Dollar as the total consideration for this
agreement along with the assumption of the service liabilities, if any. This
agreement shall be effective December 11, 2002.



Page 2

If this outlines our entire agreement correctly, please indicate your acceptance
of the terms herein by signing in the space below.

Agreed and Accepted


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
John Harris, Chief Executive Officer                                  Date
Viseon, Inc.

Agreed and Accepted


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John O'Donnell, Chief Executive Officer                            Date
Comlink, Inc.
#### John MOSLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1131.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 26, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8189 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to prohibit a State from 

counting a ballot cast in an election for Federal office which is received 

by the State after the date of the election. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 

Mr. GOHMERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to prohibit 

a State from counting a ballot cast in an election for 

Federal office which is received by the State after the 

date of the election. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITING COUNTING BALLOTS RECEIVED 

4 AFTER DATE OF ELECTION. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—Title III of the Help America 

6 Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 21081 et seq.) is amended 

7 by inserting after section 303 the following new section: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8189 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 303A. PROHIBITING COUNTING OF BALLOTS RE2 CEIVED AFTER DATE OF ELECTION. 

3 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—A State may not count a ballot 

4 cast in an election for Federal office which is received by 

5 the State after the date of the election. For purposes of 

6 this subsection, a ballot shall be considered to be received 

7 by the State after the date of the election if the ballot 

8 is not received by the appropriate State or local election 

9 official prior to 12:01 a.m. on the day after the date of 

10 the election. 

11 ‘‘(b) EXCEPTION FOR ABSENT UNIFORMED SERV12 ICES VOTERS AND OVERSEAS CITIZENS.—Subsection (a) 

13 does not apply with respect to any individual who is enti14 tled to vote by absentee ballot under the Uniformed and 

15 Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (52 U.S.C. 20301 

16 et seq.). 

17 ‘‘(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply 

18 with respect to the regularly scheduled general election for 

19 Federal office held in November 2020 and each succeeding 

20 election for Federal office.’’. 

21 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT RELATING TO EN22 FORCEMENT.—Section 401 of such Act (52 U.S.C. 21111) 

23 is amended by striking ‘‘and 303’’ and inserting ‘‘303, and 

24 303A’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8189 IH

1 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

2 of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating 

3 to section 303 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 303A. Prohibiting counting of ballots received after date of election.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
256 La. 915

#### HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY v. P. J. CHAPPUIS, II et al.

No. 50949.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 9, 1970.

In re: P. J. Chappuis, II et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Acadia. 239 So.2d 400.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
Exhibit 12
                            FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION
                       Statement of Computation of Ratios
                              (Dollars In millions)


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges:

                                    Twelve Months Ended          Year Ended
                                          June 30,               December 31,
                                      1998     1997              1997    1996
                                     ------   ------            ------  ------

NET INCOME                           $207.3   $180.1            $135.9  $238.4

Add:
  Operating Income Taxes               115.7    97.4              69.9   135.8
  Other Income Taxes                      .2      -                 -      (.1)
                                      ------   -----            ------  ------
Income Before Taxes                    323.2   277.5             205.8   374.1

Total Interest Charges                 137.0    99.9             117.3    98.4
                                      ------  ------            ------  ------
Total Earnings (A)                    $460.2  $377.4            $323.1  $472.5

Fixed Charges (B)                     $137.0  $ 99.9            $117.3   $98.4
                                      ------  ------            ------  ------
Ratio of Earnings to
  Fixed Charges (A/B)                  3.36    3.78              2.75    4.80
                                      ======  ======            ======  ======
#### Lawrence D. EVANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Nathaniel PRESSLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Charles Elwood COBB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 40853, 40860 and 40984.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 14, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 17, 1973.

Morton A. Orbach and Michael S. Hacker, Miami, for Lawrence D. Evans.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, for Nathaniel Pressley.

Bernard A. Wieder, Miami Beach, for Charles Elwood Cobb.

Robert' L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants were convicted of murder in the first degree without recommendation of mercy in the Circuit Court, m and for Dade County, Florida. Subsequently, under authority of Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972), the Supreme Court of Florida in Anderson v. State, 267 So.2d 8 (Fla.1972), reduced appellants’ sentences from death to life imprisonment. Upon careful consideration of the record and briefs, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, the convictions, as previously modified by reduction of sentences, are affirmed.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Killman,
Murrell & Company P.C.


Certified
Public Accountants





1931
      E. 37th
      Street,
              Suite
      7
            3300
      North ‘A’ Street,
              Building
      4, Suite 200
            2626
      Royal CircleOdessa,
      Texas 79762
            Midland,
      Texas 79705
            Kingwood,
      Texas 77339(432)
      363-0067
            (432)
      686-9381
            (281)
      359-7224Fax
      (432) 363-0376
            Fax
      (432) 684-6722
            Fax
      (281) 359-7112

















Consent
of Killman, Murrell & Company, P.C., Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement (Form
S-8, No.___-­­___) of Nitro Petroleum, Inc. for our report dated May 17,
2010, with respect to the financial statements of Nitro Petroleum, Inc. included
in its Annual Report (Form 10-K), as amended for the year ended January 31,
2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  We also
consent to the reference to us and to our report dated May 17,
2010,  under the heading “Experts” in the Prospectus, which is part of
this Registration Statement.














Killman,
Murrell & Company, P.C.


Odessa,
Texas


July 30,
2010
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 767 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 767

    To provide for a 2-year delay in the effective date of certain 
  regulations applicable to municipal solid waste landfills under the 
                       Solid Waste Disposal Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1993

   Mr. English of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for a 2-year delay in the effective date of certain 
  regulations applicable to municipal solid waste landfills under the 
                       Solid Waste Disposal Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Solid Waste Disposal Relief Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN EXISTING FACILITIES FROM MEETING REVISED 
              CRITERIA FOR LANDFILLS.

    (a) Exemption.--During the 2-year period commencing October 9, 
1993, all municipal solid waste landfills existing as of October 8, 
1993, which meet the requirements of the criteria applicable as of 
January 1, 1993, to such landfills under section 4004(a) of the Solid 
Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6944(a)) (as required by section 4010(c) 
of such Act) shall be exempt from any revised criteria established for 
such landfills.
    (b) Prior Criteria Applicable During Exemption Period.--Landfills 
exempt from revised criteria as provided in subsection (a) shall, 
during the 2-year exemption period, be subject to the criteria 
applicable to such landfills as of January 1, 1993.
    (c) Effective Date of Revised Criteria.--After the expiration of 
the 2-year exemption period on October 9, 1995, all municipal solid 
waste landfills shall be subject to the revised criteria established 
for such landfills under section 4004(a) of the Solid Waste Disposal 
Act (42 U.S.C. 6944(a)) or any subsequent revised criteria.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7766 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7766

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the research tax 
 credit and provide better access to the credit for business startups.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2020

Mrs. Walorski (for herself and Mr. Arrington) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the research tax 
 credit and provide better access to the credit for business startups.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN RESEARCH CREDIT AND BETTER ACCESS TO CREDIT FOR 
              STARTUPS.

    (a) Credit Rate Increase.--
            (1) In general.--Section 41(a) of the Internal Revenue Code 
        of 1986 is amended by striking ``20 percent'' and inserting 
        ``40 percent''.
            (2) Alternative simplified credit.--Section 41(c)(4)(A) of 
        such Code is amended by striking ``14 percent'' and inserting 
        ``28 percent''.
            (3) Credit rate in case of no research expenses in 3 
        preceding years.--Section 41(c)(4)(B)(ii) of such Code is 
        amended by striking ``6 percent'' and inserting ``\1/2\ the 
        credit percentage in effect under subparagraph (A)''.
    (b) Modification of Small Business Portion Allowed Against Payroll 
Tax.--
            (1) Increase in limitation.--Paragraphs (4)(B)(i) and 
        (5)(B)(ii) of section 41(h) of such Code are each amended by 
        striking ``$250,000'' and inserting ``$500,000''.
            (2) Qualified small business gross receipts threshold.--
        Section 41(h)(3)(A)(i)(I) of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``$5,000,000'' and inserting ``the dollar amount in effect for 
        the taxable year under section 448(c)(1)''.
    (c) Effective Dates.--
            (1) Subsection (a).--The amendments made by subsection (a) 
        shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
            (2) Subsection (b).--The amendments made by subsection (b) 
        shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 05/75-0267 issued to Alpha Capital III SBIC, L.P., said license is hereby declared null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.

Dated: April 27, 2018.

A. Joseph Shepard,

Associate Administrator for Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2018-13101 Filed 6-18-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P
1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________________

No. 06-10153

__________________________

In Re: ROBERT JAMES NEVILLE,

Movant.

___________________________________________________

On Motion for Authorization to File 

Successive Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus in the United States District Court

Before the Northern District of Texas

___________________________________________________

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robert James Neville moves pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2) for authorization to file a

successive petition for writ of habeas corpus. He assertsthat Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002)

and Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005) created a new rule of constitutional law, made

retroactive by the Supreme Court, making the execution of mentally ill persons unconstitutional. No

such rule of constitutional law was created, however, by either Atkins or Roper. See, e.g., In re

Woods, 155 F. App’x. 132, 136 (5th Cir. 2005) (declining to grant a successive habeas petition to

consider the defendant’s alleged mental illness because the new constitutional rule created in Atkins

does not cover mental illness). He, therefore, cannot satisfy the requirements asset forth by AEPDA
1Twenty years ago, Ford v. Wainwright established that the Eighth Amendment prohibitsthe

execution ofthe insane. 477 U.S. 399, 410 (1986). Neville, however, does not assert that he isinsane.

2These affidavits do not address whether Neville has a mental illness. These affidavits were

prepared for the Texasstate court proceedingsin which Neville argued that he wasmentallyretarded.

The Texas court found that he failed to make a prima facie case of retardation and, therefore, denied

his motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus. In his briefs to this court, Neville no longer argues

that he is mentally retarded, but rather now claims mental illness.

2

needed to grant authorization to file a successive habeas petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2).1

In addition, Neville does not present a prima facie case that he is mentally ill. He putsforward

only two pieces of evidence. First, he points to the testimony of a medical doctor presented during

the punishment phase of Neville’s trial. The doctor testified that Neville has lupus, which can make

him act erratically and irrationally. Second, Neville pointsto several affidavitssubmitted by Neville’s

former counsel. These attorneys attest that they believe that Neville has mental deficiencies and that

they believe that Neville might be mentally retarded.2 Neither the doctor’s testimony regarding

Neville’s lupus nor his former attorneys’ impressions of his mental state constitute “a sufficient

showing of possible merit to warrant a fuller exploration by the district court.” In re Morris, 328 F.3d

739, 740 (5th Cir. 2003) (internal quotation omitted).

Therefore, we DENY Neville’s petition to file a successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus

and DENY Neville’s motion for a stay of execution.
#### Mrs. Joyce Fascio Leaber, wife of/and Elroy LEABER v. JOLLEY ELEVATOR CORPORATION, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Financial Property Development Corp., and American Motorists Insurance Co.

No. 61838.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 31, 1978.

In re: Esco Elevators, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 354 So.2d 746.

Writ denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                    Report on Financial Statement Schedule
                      and Consent of Independent Auditors
                      -----------------------------------

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Hello Direct, Inc.

The audits referred to in our report dated January 24, 1997, included the
related financial statement schedule as of December 31, 1996, and for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, included in the
annual report on Form 10-K.  This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits.  In our
opinion, this financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form
S-8 of Hello Direct, Inc. of our report dated January 24, 1997, relating to the
balance sheets of Hello Direct, Inc. as of December 31, 1996, and 1995, and the
related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1996, and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in this December 31, 1996,
annual report on Form 10-K of Hello Direct, Inc.



/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

San Jose, California
March 24, 1997
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 651

To amend the National and Community Service Act of 1990 to authorize

appropriations for the Civilian Community Corps Demonstration Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 1993

Mr. ENGLISH of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Education and Labor

A BILL

To amend the National and Community Service Act of 1990

to authorize appropriations for the Civilian Community

Corps Demonstration Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 195N of the National and

5 Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12653n), as

6 added by section 1092(a) of the National Defense Author7 ization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484;

8 106 Stat. 2522), is amended—

9 (1) by striking out ‘‘The Commission,’’ and in10 serting in lieu thereof ‘‘(b) FUNDING LIMITATION.—
2

•HR 651 IH

1 Notwithstanding section 501(2)(D), the Commis2 sion,’’; and

3 (2) by inserting below the section heading the

4 following new subsection:

5 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—For fis6 cal year 1994 and each subsequent fiscal year, there is

7 authorized to be appropriated for the Civilian Community

8 Corps Demonstration Program established pursuant to

9 section 195A such sums as may be necessary to carry out

10 the program.’’.

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—(1) The heading of

12 such section is amended to read as follows:

13 ‘‘SEC. 195N. FUNDING MATTERS.’’.

14 (2) The item relating to such section in the table of

15 contents in section 1(b) of the National and Community

16 Service Act of 1990 (Public Law 101–610; 104 Stat.

17 3127) is amended to read as follows:

‘‘195N. Funding matters.’’.

Æ