alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERISTEEL CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,026
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,597
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    119,362
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,991
<PP&E>                                         321,178
<DEPRECIATION>                                  71,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 539,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,227
<BONDS>                                        214,875
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                     169,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   539,081
<SALES>                                        498,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               498,924
<CGS>                                          403,006
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  403,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,258
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,314
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,711
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,603
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,603
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.43
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,903
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    140,014
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               237,491
<PP&E>                                         406,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                 129,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 601,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,457
<BONDS>                                        232,459
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                     229,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   601,915
<SALES>                                        353,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               353,978
<CGS>                                          315,416
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  315,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,987
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,290
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,086
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,086
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 8, 2009

p0108 

# Order

January 8, 2009

137920 & (14)

DEBRA ELIZABETH KRUG, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137920 COA: 289308 Roscommon Circuit Court KIM LEE VICTOR, Family Division: 05-725368-DZ Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to ap peal the December 12, 2008 order of th e Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be rev iewed by this Court.
#### Robert CARPENTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-986.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 19, 1973.

Phillip A. Plubbart, Public Defender, and Harold G. Melville and John Lipinski, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William L. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

See: Williams v. State, Fla.App.1966, 187 So.2d 913; Dreger v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 431.
PUBLIC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

__________________________________________

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Intuit, Inc., ) Docket No. 9408 

 a corporation, ) 

) 

Respondent. ) 

__________________________________________)

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Non-party Camelot Communications Ltd. (“Camelot”) and Complaint Counsel for the 

Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) filed a joint motion to extend the time for Camelot to file a 

motion to quash or to limit a subpoena duces tecum served on Camelot by Complaint Counsel 

(“Joint Motion”). 

Upon review and consideration of the Joint Motion, the Joint Motion is GRANTED. It is 

hereby ORDERED that Camelot’s deadline to file a motion to quash or to limit the FTC’s

subpoena duces tecum is hereby extended until and including November 28, 2022.

ORDERED:

D. Michael Chappell

Chief Administrative Law Judge

Date: November 8, 2022 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/8/2022 | Document No. 606142 | PAGE Page 1 of 1 * PUBLIC *; A
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2415

_____________________________

WILLIAM SWAIM,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County.

Robert M. Foster, Judge.

March 29, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

LEWIS, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Carrie McMullen, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Daniel Krumbholz, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<PAGE>
                             EXHIBIT 11.1

             Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings


                                      33
<PAGE>
 
Computation of Earnings Per Share
---------------------------------

The following formula was used to calculate the earnings per share, Consolidated
Statements of Income for the three months ended and nine months ended 
September 30, 1996 and 1995, included in this report as Exhibit 13.
 
             (Calculation)                                        (Ratio)

Net Income / Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the period
=  Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                Three months ended
                                  September 30,
                                 1996         1995
                               -------       -------
<S>                              <C>           <C>
Weighted Average
Shares Outstanding               775,268       775,268
 
Net Income                       435,046       418,489
 
Per Share Amount                     .56           .54
<CAPTION>
                                 Nine months ended
                                   September 30,
                                1996          1995
                               -------       -------
<S>                            <C>           <C>
Weighted Average
Shares Outstanding               775,268       775,268
 
Net Income                     1,214,684     1,071,314
 
Per Share Amount                    1.57          1.38
 
</TABLE>

No common stock equivalents exist, therefore primary and fully diluted earnings
per share are the same.

                                      34
Exhibit (31)(a)
 WACHOVIA CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 CERTIFICATION
      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ G. Kennedy Thompson
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7726 

To permit child care providers that receive payment for services provided 

under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to 

use a portion of such payment to purchase personal protective equipment, 

and other equipment, necessary to protect the health of participating 

children and child care workers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2020 

Ms. MUCARSEL-POWELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To permit child care providers that receive payment for services provided under the Child Care and Development 

Block Grant Act of 1990 to use a portion of such payment to purchase personal protective equipment, and 

other equipment, necessary to protect the health of participating children and child care workers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Protection 

5 In Childcare Act’’ or the ‘‘EPIC Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7726 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE PERSONAL PROTECTIVE 

2 EQUIPMENT TO PROTECT THE HEALTH OF 

3 CHILDREN WHO RECEIVE CERTAIN CHILD 

4 CARE SERVICES. 

5 A child care provider who receives payment for serv6 ices provided under the Child Care and Development 

7 Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9857 et seq.) may 

8 use a portion of such payment to purchase personal pro9 tective equipment, and other equipment, necessary to pro10 tect the health of children who receive such services and 

11 child care workers who provide such services. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Pennsylvania’s Portable Fuel Container Amendment

The file size of this document is greater than 50MB. Because of its unusually large size, this 

document is not available for download from www.regulations.gov. Copies of this document are 

available for public inspection at the EPA Region III address listed in the Federal Register Proposed 

Rules document. For further information, EPA Region III’s point of contact (POC) is listed in this 

docket. 

2009 Projected Gas Containers Excel Spreadsheet

2018 Projected Gas Containers Excel Spreadsheet

MANEVU_2002_Area_040606

MANEVU2009AreaV3_1

MANEVU2018AreaV3_1

Portable Gas Containers 5-2-13

Portable gas containers read me

Portable Gas Containers
Exhibit
23.1


CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (No. 333-137419) of ONEOK Partners, L.P. of our report dated February 24,
2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form
10-K.








/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP





Tulsa,
Oklahoma


February
24, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Annual Report of Benihana Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the period ended March 27, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel A. Schwartz,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Joel A. Schwartz
-----------------------------------------
Joel A. Schwartz
President and
Chief Executive Officer

July 25, 2005
Exhibit 99.1








February 27, 2013Analyst Contact:T.D. Eureste918-588-7167Media Contact:Brad Borror918-588-7582





ONEOK Partners to Participate in


Simmons Energy Conference





TULSA, Okla. – Feb. 27, 2013 -- ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will participate in the Simmons Energy Conference in Las Vegas, Nev., on Feb. 28, 2013.


Terry K. Spencer, president of ONEOK Partners, and Derek S. Reiners, senior vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer of ONEOK Partners, will conduct a series of one-on-one meetings with investment-community representatives at the conference.


The materials utilized at the conference will be accessible on the ONEOK Partners website, www.oneokpartners.com , on Thursday, Feb. 28, 2013, beginning at 5 a.m. Pacific Standard Time (7 a.m. Central Standard Time).








ONEOK Partners, L.P. (pronounced ONE-OAK) (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy company, which owns 43.4 percent of the overall partnership interest. ONEOK is one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S.





For more information, visit the website at www.oneokpartners.com .





For the latest news about ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKPartners .





###
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of Horizon Health Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending August 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ JAMES K. NEWMAN                  
|James K. Newman                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|November 11, 2005                    



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ JOHN E. PITTS      
|John E. Pitts          
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 11, 2005
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Calvin AUSTIN.

No. 61959.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 14, 1978.

Ned D. Wright, Monroe, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara B. Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Carl Par-kerson, Dist. Atty., Kenneth A. Rains, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40438 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN ANTONIO RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-98-CR-337-1

-------------------- December 20, 1999 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juan Antonio Ramos appeals the sentence imposed upon his guilty-plea conviction for possession with the intent to distribute cocaine. Ramos argues that the district court erred in denying application of the safety-valve provision provided in U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2 because he provided to the Government all information and evidence he had concerning the offense. Under § 5C1.2, the district court may sentence a defendant without regard to the statutory minimum sentence if it is determined, inter alia , that the defendant truthfully providedNo. 99-40438 -2- the Government with “all information and evidence the defendant has concerning the offense[.]” § 5C1.2(5). We review a district court’s refusal to apply § 5C1.2 based on factual findings for clear error. See United States v. Edwards , 65 F.3d 430, 433 (5th Cir. 1995). We perceive no such error here.
AFFIRMED.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Albert GWINN.

No. 62870.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 15, 1978.

In re: Albert Gwinn applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ granted: The death penalty is not applicable here. See: *State v. Lewis,*353 So.2d 703 (La.1977); *State v. Smith,*351 So.2d 1191 (La.1977); *State*v. *Brooks,*351 So.2d 1197 (La.1977); *State v. Lee,*340 So.2d 180 (La.1976). The case is remanded for trial.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains a summary of financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                         107,737
<SECURITIES>                                   203,282
<RECEIVABLES>                                  337,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                    41,661
<INVENTORY>                                    732,219
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,546,890
<PP&E>                                       1,223,077
<DEPRECIATION>                                 552,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,370,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,230,571
<BONDS>                                      1,598,926
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        902
<COMMON>                                        71,104
<OTHER-SE>                                     789,907
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,370,284
<SALES>                                      2,142,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,142,305
<CGS>                                        1,219,794
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,114,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                52,319
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              65,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (33,155)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (12,599)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (43,075)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (43,075)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.61)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2015

d0921 

# Order

Clerk September 29, 2015

149438(21)

SNOW COUNTRY CONTRACTING, INC., and

THOMAS L. SCHNELLER,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v SC: 149438

COA: 318671

Gogebic CC: 12

- 000010

- AA

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF IRONWOOD

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’ s February 3,

2015 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
No. 00-909.

#### Garcia *v.*County of Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department et al.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.