alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 701 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 701

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 25 percent 
             investment tax credit for recycling equipment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 1993

 Mr. Volkmer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 25 percent 
             investment tax credit for recycling equipment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 25 PERCENT INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT FOR RECYCLING EQUIPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 46 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of 
paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end of paragraph (3) and 
inserting ``, and'', and by adding at the end thereof the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(4) in the case of recycling equipment (as defined in 
        section 48(l)(2)(A)(iv)), the recycling percentage.''
    (b) Recycling Percentage.--Subsection (b) of section 46 of such 
Code is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(5) Recycling percentage.--The term `recycling 
        percentage' means 25 percent.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to periods after December 31, 1993, under rules similar to the 
rules of section 48(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains certain summary information extracted from the
financial statements dated September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial information.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                        3,199,116
<SECURITIES>                                  7,792,149
<RECEIVABLES>                                 9,153,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                  84,379,904
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            110,250,244
<PP&E>                                        3,648,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              121,343,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        90,330,477
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           5
<COMMON>                                         31,108
<OTHER-SE>                                   14,569,387
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                121,343,504
<SALES>                                      23,953,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             27,052,732
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                25,952,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            4,286,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,191,651)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    600,686
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,590,965)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,590,965)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.09)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification

I,
Jesper V. Christensen, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sauer-Danfoss Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: March 4, 2010

/s/ JESPER V. CHRISTENSEN Jesper V. Christensen Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
----

----

|   | (1)    |                                  | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                  |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    |                                  | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|   |   |                                  |                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|   |   | /s/ Andrew S. Prince                  |                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|   |   |                                  |                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|   |   | Andrew S. Prince                      |                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|   |   | and Chief Financial Officer      |                                                                                                                                                 |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 28489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13078]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held July 10, 2018, and July 11, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Billups at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(214) 413-6523.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Tuesday, July 10, 2018 and Wednesday, July 11, 2018, from 
8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. 
Notification of intent to participate must be made with Lisa Billups. 
For more information please contact Lisa Billups at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(214) 413-6523, or write TAP Office, 1114 Commerce Street, Dallas, TX 
75242-1021, or post comments to the website: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various committee issues for submission to 
the IRS and other TAP related topics. Public input is welcomed.

    Dated: June 13, 2018.
Antoinette Ross,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2018-13078 Filed 6-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:Transcript of the public hearing held on 2/19/13 in East St. Louis, Illinois.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/8/2022 | Document No. 606144 | PAGE Page 1 of 1 * PUBLIC *; 

__________________________________________ 

PUBLIC 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Intuit, Inc., ) Docket No. 9408

 a corporation, ) 

) 

Respondent. ) 

__________________________________________) 

ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH OR LIMIT 

SUBPOENA SERVED ON LISA BOLDINI 

Nonparty Lisa Boldini filed a motion to quash and/or limit a subpoena served on her by 

Respondent Intuit, Inc. (“Respondent”). Respondent states that it has formally withdrawn 

Respondent’s subpoena to Ms. Boldini. Accordingly, the Motion is DENIED as moot. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: November 8, 2022
Order filed June 9, 2016



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _ _____



### No. 11

- 15

- 00013

- C V

______ _ ____



### JAMES BOSWELL , Appellant

V.

ECTOR COU NTY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; ECISD

SCHOOL BOARD TRUSTEES ; MIKE ATKINS ; TRYON LEWIS ; MURRAY A. CRUTCHER, III ; AND ATKINS, HOLLMANN, JONES, PEACOCK, LEWIS & LYON , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 70 th District Court

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. A

- 133,485

O R D E R

We have reviewed the “Affidavit by James Boswell” filed in this cause on

April 25 , 2016. Among other things requested by Boswell in his affidavit, Boswell

asked that we file the document as a request for the recusal of J ustice John Bailey.

Pursuant to Rule 16.3(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure , Justice Bailey2

has considered the motion in chambers. Justice Bailey has found no reason to recuse

himself and

, pursuant to Rule 16.3(b), has certified the issue to t he entire court for a

determination by the other justices of this court. 1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 16.3(b)

.

Chief Justice Jim R. Wright and Justice Mike Willson have decided the m atter

without Justice Bailey ’s participation.

The recusal of appellate judges is controlled by Rule 16 of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure. The grounds for recusal of an appellate court justice are

provided in the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 16.2; see T EX

. R.

C IV

. P . 18b. W e find no reason for Justice Bailey to recuse him self and hold that

none of the grounds s et out in Rule 18b are applicable to Justice Bailey in this case

.

See T EX

. R. C IV

. P . 18b ; see also Manges v. Guerra , 673 S.W.2d 180, 185 (Tex.

1984); McCull ough v. Kitzman , 50 S.W.3d 87, 88 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2001, pet.

denied).

Boswell’s request for the recusal of Justice John Bailey is denied.

PER CURIAM

June 9, 2016

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
and Willson, J.

Bailey, J., not participating.

1 A copy of Justice Bailey ’s written certification is attached to this order

.Certification filed June 9, 2016



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _ _____



### No. 11

- 15

- 00013

- C V

____ _ ______



### JAMES BOSWELL , Appellant

V.

ECTOR COUNTY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ; ECISD

SCHOOL BOARD TRUSTEES ; MIKE ATKINS ; TRYON LEWIS ; MURRAY A. CRUTCHER, III ; AND ATKINS, HOLLMANN, JONES, PEACOCK, LEWIS & LYON , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 70 th District Court

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. A

- 133,485

C E R T I F I C A T I O N

I have reviewed the “A ffidavit by James Boswell” filed in this cause on

April 25, 2016 . To the extent the document seeks my recusal , I have reviewed the

document in chambers. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 16.3(b). I find no reason to recuse

myself and, under Rule 16.3(b), certify the issue of my recusal to the entire court for2

a determination by the other justices of this court. See Manges v. Guerra , 673

S.W.2d 180, 185 (Tex. 1984); McCullo ugh v. Kitzman , 50 S.W.3d 87, 88 (Tex.

App.

— Waco 20 01, pet. denied).

JOHN M. BAILEY

JUSTICE
#### Kenneth JOSEPH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-50.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 22, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delhaize America, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form
10-Q), we, Pierre-Olivier Beckers and Carol M. Herndon, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(i) the Form 10-Q
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



Dated: May 17, 2005.



/s/ Pierre-Olivier BeckersPierre-Olivier BeckersChief Executive Officer/s/ Carol M. HerndonCarol M. HerndonChief Accounting Officer




A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS
WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Exhibit 32(2)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Florida Public Utilities Company (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, George Bachman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/George Bachman

George Bachman
Chief Financial Officer
August 11, 2003

{MI670281;1}
# Official Journal C 379A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 379A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 628 November 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 379A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 628 November 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 379 A/01 | European Labour Authority (ELA) — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Executive Director in Bratislava (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2019/20045 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2019/C 379 A/01

European Labour Authority (ELA) — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Executive Director in Bratislava (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2019/20045

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### P. Minnig Co., Appellant, *v.*Carter.

Submitted April 9, 1934.

Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*Russell M. Orcutt,*for appellant.

*Gunnison, Fish, Gifford and Chapin,*for appellee.

July 13, 1934:

Opinion by

James, J.,

On January 1, 1924, defendant executed in favor of the plaintiff, a demand promissory note in the sum of $600 which contained a warrant of attorney to confess judgment, but with an added stipulation “not to be entered except in default of payment.” On the *232back of the note were various endorsements showing payments on interest and principal, the last payment being dated July 13, 1928. On February 23, 1932, the prothonotary of Erie County entered judgment on the note without an averment of demand or default in payment. Defendant's rule to strike off the judgment was made absolute, from which order plaintiff has appealed.

Without the added stipulation, the note would properly have been entered, for the entry of the judgment itself is a demand: First National Bank of Sayre v. Bartlett, 35 Pa. Superior Ct. 593. But the terms of the note contemplate something additional in that there must have been a default in payment as a condition *precedent to the entry of judgment.*The stipulation clearly contemplated that the plaintiff should make a demand and that default in payment must follow before judgment could be entered. The court below in its opinion clearly stated the situation in the following language: “The entry, of the judgment can not be regarded both as a demand and also as an averment of default of payment after demand, for the default would then occur after the entry of the judgment and the note, according to its terms, authorizes entry of judgment after and not before such default. We are of the opinion, therefore, from a fair construction of the note, that a prior demand is essential and judgment may be entered thereafter only in the event of nonpayment and that both demand and nonpayment thereafter, must be averred to entitle plaintiffs to a valid judgment: Kolf v. Lieberman, 282 Pa. 479.”

In the latter case it was held that where the authority to enter judgment is dependent upon some act or omission of the defendant, there must be an averment of such default or delinquency before a valid judgment can be entered. See also Advance*233Rumely Thresher Co. Inc. v. Frederick, 98 Pa. Superior Ct. 560, 562; Jordan v. Kirschner, 94 Pa. Superior Ct. 252.

Order affirmed.
review the court's application of the law to those facts de novo. Lader v. 

Warden, 121 Nev. 682, 686, 120 P.3d 1164, 1166 (2005). 

Jefferson argues that counsel was ineffective for failing to 

request a jury instruction on the theory that reasonable mistake of age is a 

defense to statutory sexual seduction (NRS 200.364(6))." Jefferson has 

failed to demonstrate deficiency or prejudice. As Jefferson conceded 

below, this court has held that a reasonable mistake as to the victim's age 

is not a defense to statutory sexual seduction. See Jenkins v. State, 110 

Nev. 865, 870-71, 877 P.2d 1063, 1067 (1994). Further, while the defense 

is entitled to a jury instruction on its theory of defense, that theory must 

be supported by some evidence and it must be an accurate statement of 

law. McCraney v. State, 110 Nev. 250, 255, 871 P.2d 922, 925 (1994); 

Vallery v. State, 118 Nev. 357, 372, 46 P.3d 66, 77 (2002). Here, it was not 

the theory of defense (that the State failed to meet its burden of proof), 

Jefferson identifies no evidence that would support such a theory, and it is 

not an accurate statement of law. It would therefore have been a futile 

request, and counsel was not objectively unreasonable in not making it. 

See Ennis v. State, 122 Nev. 694, 706, 137 P.3d 1095, 1103 (2006). 

Moreover, Jefferson has failed to demonstrate a reasonable probability of a 

different outcome at trial where he was also convicted of the alternate, 

'Jefferson's fast track statement refers to a charge of "Statutory 

Sexual Assault on a Minor." No such crime exists. Jefferson raised this 

claim below in the context of his convictions for statutory sexual seduction. 

We decline to address his claims to the extent that he is attempting to 

expand them on appeal to reach his convictions for sexual assault of a 

child under 16 years old. See Davis v. State, 107 Nev. 600, 606, 817 P.2d 

1169, 1173 (1991), overruled on other grounds by Means, 120 Nev. at 1012- 

13, 103 P.3d at 33. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A e 2 
greater offenses of sexual assault of a child under 16 years. Accordingly, 

we conclude that the district court did not err in denying this claim, and 

we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

, C.J. 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre —Cinkaltatrr 

J. 

Douglas 

cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge 

Terrence M. Jackson 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

3 

(0) 1947A cep
EXHIBIT 11.1

Computation of Earnings Per Share

The following formula was used to calculate the earnings
per share, Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, included in this report as Exhibit 13.3.

Earnings Per Share

Net Income / Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the
period



|                                    |  |                                 |           |      |   |          
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | --------- | ---- | - | ---------
|                                    |  | Three months endedSeptember 30,
|                                    |  | 2009                            |           | 2008
|Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  |                                 | 1,589,411 |      |   | 1,589,411
|Net Income                          |  | $                               | 468,248   |      | $ | 521,905  
|Per Share Amount                    |  | $                               | 0.30      |      | $ | 0.33     
|                                    | 
|                                    |  | Nine months endedSeptember 30, 
|                                    |  | 2009                            |           | 2008
|Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  |                                 | 1,589,411 |      |   | 1,589,411
|Net Income                          |  | $                               | 1,538,067 |      | $ | 1,669,463
|Per Share Amount                    |  | $                               | 0.97      |      | $ | 1.05     

No common stock equivalents exist.
#### George SKAF, Appellant, v. Herbert GELERNTER, Joe Cohen and Pauline Brooks, doing business as Gelco Building, a partnership, Appellees.

No. 69-337.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 23, 1969.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; James M. Reasbeck, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.