alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed, April 15 , 2014
.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

____________ NO. 01

- 13

- 00896

- CR
VICTOR CHARLES BANKETT , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No 8

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case 1866497



### ABATEMENT ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due November 19, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. O n November 26, 2013 , this court ordered Sondra Humphrey , the court reporter , to file the record within 30 days

. On December 06, 2013 Humphrey filed a motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record which was granted until January 31, 2014

. The record has not been filed with the court.In cause number 01

- 13

- 00227

- CR, Washington v. State , this Court ordered

Humphrey to appear and show cause as to why she had not filed the reporter’s record in this court. On March 26, 2014, Humphrey f ailed to appear as noticed. Humphrey has also failed to file reporter records in cause numbers 01

- 13

- 0063 2

- CR, Castillo s v. State , 01

- 13

- 00 633

- CR, Matamoros v. State , and 01

- 13

- 01048

- CR, Acosta v. State.
T he trial and appellate courts are jointly responsi ble for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely as ordered in this cause and because Humphrey is delinquent on the matters listed above , we issue the follow ing or der. We direct the judge of the County Criminal Court at Law No 8 to conduct a hearing at which Sondra Humphrey , a court reporter, appellant’s counsel, and appellee’s counsel shall participate (a) to determine the reason for failure to file the

recor d; (b) to establish a date certain when the reporter’s record will be filed, and (c) to make findings as to whether Sondra Humphrey should be held in contempt of court for failing to file the reporter’s record timely as ordered. We order the court to prep are a record, in the form of a reporter’s record, of the hearing. The judge shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The hearing record and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 30 days of the date of this order. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be re instated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. If Sondra Humphrey files the record prior to the date set for the hearing, the appeal will be reinstated and the trial court need not hold a hearing.PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle
Martin Robles was tried separately for the murders of Jesus Gonzalez and John Commisky. He was 1

found guilty of two counts of capital murder and sentenced to death. See Robles v. State, 2006 WL 1096971

(Tex. Crim. App. April 26, 2006) (not designated for publication).
----

----

----

----

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | FOREST OIL CORPORATION |
|   |   |   |
|   | By: | /s/ Cyrus D. Marter IV |
|   |   | Name: Cyrus D. Marter IVTitle: SVP, General Counsel and Secretary |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | LONE PINE RESOURCES INC. |
|   |   |   |
|   | By: | /s/ Edward J. Bereznicki |
|   |   | Name: Edward J. BereznickiTitle: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,511,378
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,697,851
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300,410
<INVENTORY>                                      5,025,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,544,673
<PP&E>                                          79,552,051
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,594,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,904,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,460,919
<BONDS>                                         28,568,314
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,175,261
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,271,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,904,645
<SALES>                                         13,482,999
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,696,139
<CGS>                                           11,928,925
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,251,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,667,289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    827,975
<INCOME-TAX>                                       467,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                866,096
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       866,096
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.29
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7861 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7861

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
           employer credit for paid family and medical leave.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2020

 Mr. Carter of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
           employer credit for paid family and medical leave.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EMPLOYER CREDIT FOR PAID FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE MADE 
              PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 45S of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by striking subsection (i).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to wages paid in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
#### George P. DONALDSON, Jr., Appellant, v. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF PLANTATION, Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-947.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 16, 1970.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Broward County; Fred S. Schmunk, Jr., Judge.

Appeal quashed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Donald VIGNE.

No. 62615.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Donald Vigne applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition. Parish of Iberia.

Granted. The judgment rescinding the order for a hearing on motion for new trial is reversed, and a hearing is ordered on the motion for new trial. (See C.Cr.P. 851(3) and 853).
EXHIBIT 99.1

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

          DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS PLANS PRIVATE OFFERING OF
            APPROXIMATELY $250 MILLION IN SENIOR NOTES

OKLAHOMA CITY, June 9, 2000 - Dobson  Communications  Corporation
(Nasdaq: DCEL) announced today that it plans to effect a  private
offering under Rule 144A of $250 million in senior notes due 2010.
Net  proceeds from the offering will be used to pay down existing
bank debt and for general corporate purposes.

     The unsecured notes will rank pari passu in right of payment
with any of Dobson's existing and future senior indebtedness  and
will be senior to all existing and future subordinated debt.

     The senior notes to be offered will not be registered  under
the Securities Act of 1933, and may not be offered or sold in the
United States absent registration or any applicable exemption from
registration.
261 La. 1055

#### Joann A. TREME v. AMERICAN MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 52466.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 23, 1972.

In re: Joann A. Treme applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Acadia. 260 So.2d 41.

Writ refused — On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.

TATE, J., believes that a writ should be granted.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion that the judgment of the Court of Appeal appears to be in error, even on the facts found, and the writ should be granted.
No. 00-850.

#### Neal, Personal Representative of the Estate of Neal, Deceased, et al. *v.*St. Louis County Board of Police Commissioners et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Massey Energy Company (the
Company) for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don L. Blankenship, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |                                                
|-------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|August 9, 2006 |  | /s/ Don L. Blankenship                         
|               |  | Don L. Blankenship                             
|               |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             84,947
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       8,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                         3,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  102,718
<PP&E>                                             41,554
<DEPRECIATION>                                     26,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    618,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,638,565
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                            49
<COMMON>                                           38,322
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,424,909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      618,352
<SALES>                                            37,990
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   59,037
<CGS>                                               3,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     190,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  247,082
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                177,906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (556,844)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (556,844)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (556,844)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.058)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.058)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of U.S. Trust Corporation (Registration No. 33-63899)
pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of U.S. Trust Corporation, (ii) the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 of U.S. Trust Corporation (Registration No.
33-62371) pertaining to the 401(k) Plan and ESOP of United States Trust Company
of New York and Affiliated Companies and (iii) the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 of U.S. Trust Corporation (Registration No. 333-16607) pertaining to
the resale of 35,629 shares by certain selling shareholders, of our report
dated February 21, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
of U.S. Trust Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and,
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which report
is included in this Report on Form 10-K.





                                       Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.



                                             New York, New York
                                                 March 11, 1997
EXHIBIT 10.1a

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

THE PMI GROUP, INC.

AMENDED AND RESTATED EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

(Amended September 19, 2007)

THE PMI GROUP, INC., having adopted The PMI Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan) as of
May 27, 2004, and having amended and restated the Plan as of November 16, 2005, and again as of September 19, 2007, hereby amends the restated Plan as follows effective as of November 14, 2007:

Section 2.16, Fair Market Value, is amended to read as follows:

2.16 Fair Market Value means the closing market price per Share, as quoted in the New York Stock Exchange Composite
Transactions Index on the relevant date, or if there were no sales on such date, the closing market price per Share on the nearest day after the relevant date, as determined by the Committee.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The PMI Group, Inc., by its duly authorized officer, has executed this Amendment No. 1 to the restated Plan on the date
indicated below.



THE PMI GROUP, INC.By:

/s/ Charles BroomName:

Charles BroomTitle:

Senior Vice PresidentDate:

November 16, 2007
#### PALM BEACH COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. John L. HONCHELL et al., Appellees.

No. 73-806.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 19, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Robert S. Hewett, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
March 16, 2012

The Honorable Ray LaHood

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Alaska Airlines’ application for SAN-DCA, Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029. 

Dear Secretary LaHood:

Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. fully supports the application of Alaska Airlines for air service between San 

Diego and Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA). San Diego is the largest region without direct service 

to DCA. Additionally, due to the profound community of interest between San Diego and the nation’s 

capital, the region generates the largest passenger market demand without nonstop service to the 

convenient and close-in airport serving our nation’s capital. 

San Diego’s sheer market size to Washington coupled with the fact that San Diego to Dulles average airfares 

are the highest of west coast cities, should qualify for the limited slots available for this flight. The high 

airfare is exacerbated when factoring in taxi fares from Dulles to Washington’s city center that average

about $60 each way. This means travelers between Washington’s city center and San Diego via Dulles can 

pay on average close to $400 one-way. 

There are also countless other San Diego-based and Washington-based businesses that are engaged in 

health science, telecommunications, and national defense that need quick and convenient access to Reagan 

National Airport. Amylin has an immediate need for additional nonstop air service to our nation’s capital. 

Alaska Airlines service would add a needed nonstop option to a primary gateway to Washington, DC. Amylin

joins with the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, the San Diego Regional Economic Development 

Corporation, the World Trade Center San Diego, and the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce in 

support of Alaska Airlines’ application for San Diego – Washington Reagan National slots.

We thank the Department of Transportation for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced 

docket and we hope to hear of a favorable review of Alaska Airlines’ San Diego – DCA proposal soon.

Sincerely,

Daniel M. Bradbury

President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Massey Energy Company (the
Company) for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don L. Blankenship, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|             |  |  |  |                                                
|------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|May 10, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Don L. Blankenship                         
|             |  |  |  | Don L. Blankenship                             
|             |  |  |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of our reports dated March 15, 2009, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of The PMI Group, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of The PMI Group, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2008.



|                              |  |        
|----------------------------- |  | -------
|Registration Statement Number |  | On Form
|333-123049                    |  | S-8    
|333-32190                     |  | S-8    
|333-47473                     |  | S-8    
|333-63122                     |  | S-8    
|333-66829                     |  | S-8    
|333-76742                     |  | S-8    
|333-81679                     |  | S-8    
|033-99378                     |  | S-8    
|333-48035                     |  | S-3    
|333-67125                     |  | S-3    
|333-29777                     |  | S-4    
|333-102761                    |  | S-8    
|333-107747                    |  | S-3    
|333-110044                    |  | S-3    
|333-130103                    |  | S-8    
|333-130102                    |  | S-8    
|033-92636                     |  | S-8    
|333-133095                    |  | S-3    
|333-136727                    |  | S-8    
|333-152675                    |  | S-8    
|333-156955                    |  | S-3    



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Francisco, California

March 15, 2009
Exhibit 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public  Company  Accounting  Reform and  Investor
Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted),  John W. Galuchie, Jr., the
Chairman and President of General Devices,  Inc., (the  "Company"),  and Sue Ann
Itzel, the Treasurer and Secretary of the Company each hereby certifies that, to
the best of their knowledge:

     1.   The  Company's  Quarterly  Report on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended
          June 30, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1
          (the "Periodic Report"),  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or  Section  15(d) of  the  Securities  Exchange Act of
          1934, as amended;

          and

     2.   The  information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  of the Company at
          the end of the  period  covered by the Periodic  Report and results of
          operations of the Company  for  the  period  covered  by  the Periodic
          Report.


Dated:   August 13, 2002


/s/ John W. Galuchie, Jr.
---------------------------
John W. Galuchie, Jr.
Chairman and President



/s/ Sue Ann Itzel
---------------------------
Sue Ann Itzel
Treasurer and Secretary
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-30655, 333-74747,333-74715, 333-78521, 333-78567, 333-83725, 333-35806,333-62502, 333-84010, 333-90986, 333-91002, 333-117334and 333-137396 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-32221,333-60277, 333-70335, 333-85269, 333-92361, 333-32526,333-40698, 333-47914, 333-67978, 333-73274, 333-81170,and 333-84932 on Form S-3 of our report dated June 6,2006 (January 19, 2007 as to the effects of the matters discussed in Note21 and the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 2) related to thefinancial statements of THQ Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) (whichreport expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphrelated to the restatement of the consolidated financial statements asdiscussed in Note 2), and of our report dated June 6, 2006 (January 19,2007 as to the effect of the material weakness described in Management’s AnnualReport on Internal Control over Financial Reporting (restated)) on the internalcontrol over financial reporting (which report expresses an adverse opinion onthe effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financialreporting  because of the materialweakness), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of THQInc. for the year ended March 31, 2006.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Los Angeles, California

January 19, 2007

----