alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.5d



AMENDMENT NO. 4

Effective November 16, 2010

TO THE PMI GROUP, INC.

2005 OFFICER DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

(September 19, 2007 Restatement)



THE PMI GROUP, INC., having adopted The PMI Group, Inc. 2005
Officer Deferred Compensation Plan (the Plan) effective as of January 1, 2005, having amended and restated the Plan effective as of September 19, 2007, and having further amended the restated Plan effective as of
February 20, 2008, and having further amended the restated Plan as of November 20, 2008, and having further amended the restated Plan effective as of September 14, 2010, hereby again amends the restated Plan as follows:



1. The phrases or as soon as administratively
practicable thereafter and as soon as practicable thereafter are deleted from each place that they appear in the Plan.



2. Section 5.13 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:



Notwithstanding any contrary Plan
provision, any payment that is scheduled to be made to a Participant under the Plan on a Payment Date or anniversary thereof (the Designated Payment Date) shall be treated as made on the Designated Payment Date if such payment is made
either (a) on that date or a later date that is no later than (i) the end of the Participants taxable year that includes the Designated Payment Date, or (ii) if later, the fifteenth (15th) calendar day of the third calendar month immediately following
the Designated Payment Date; or (b) no earlier than 30 calendar days before the Designated Payment Date. In no event shall the Participant be permitted, directly or indirectly, to designate the taxable year of such payment.



3. This Amendment No. 4 to the restated Plan is
effective as of November 16, 2010.



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, The PMI Group, Inc., by its duly authorized officer, has executed this Amendment No. 4 to the restated Plan as of the date specified below.



|                        |  |  |  |                     |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  | THE PMI GROUP, INC.
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 18, 2010 |  |  |  | By:                 |  | /s/ Charles F. Broom                  
|                        |  |  |  |                     |  | Charles Broom                         
|                        |  |  |  |                     |  | Senior Vice President, Human Resources
#### William Kent MADDOX, a minor child, by his mother and next friend, Joan B. Maddox, Appellant, v. AMERICAN LIBERTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Alabama corporation, etc., and William K. Maddox, Appellees.

No. 71-221.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 21, 1972.

Jack B. McPherson, of Allgood, McPherson & Cobb, New Port Richey, for appellant.

Daniel N. Burton, of Pope & Burton, Tampa, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Orefice v. Albert, Fla.1970, 237 So.2d 142; Denault v. Denault, Fla.App.1969, 220 So.2d 27; and Rickard v. Rickard, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 7.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
256 La. 913

#### Lawrence Joseph SMITH v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 50940.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 9, 1970.

In re: Lawrence Joseph Smith applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. Applicant makes no showing that he has exhausted his remedies in the lower court. The showing made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our original jurisdiction. An almost identical application from this relator was denied Nov. 7, 1969. 254 La. 834, 227 So.2d 375.
#### Harry DAVIS, Appellant, v. Franklin FLATO, as Trustee et al., Appellees.

No. 2622.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 16, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; John H. Moore, II, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Annual Report of Benihana Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended March 27, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael R. Burris,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


 /s/ Michael R. Burris
--------------------------------
 Michael R. Burris
 Chief Financial Officer

 June 24, 2005








                                       61
#### HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Robert B. DEARTH, Appellee.

No. 70-335.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 16, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40477

OCTAVIUS ANDERSON; ET AL, Plaintiffs, OCTAVIUS ANDERSON; ROBERT L. DYKES; WONDER ABRAHAM; TERESA ABRON; JOSE ACEVEDO; ET AL, Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Texas

(9:98-CV-7)
June 6, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * We affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the careful opinion of Judge Hannah.
AFFIRMED.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel., Robert MATTHEWS, Tracy Lewis, Robert McClinton, Peter Ogden v. Hon. Lewis S. DOHERTY, III, Judge.

No. 61913.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Robert Matthews, Tracy Lewis, et al. applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Denied. Writ application is moot because trial is set for August 3, 1978.
Exhibit 99.1








December 7, 2015Analyst Contact:T.D. Eureste918-588-7167Media Contact:Stephanie Higgins918-591-5026








ONEOK and ONEOK Partners to Present at


Wells Fargo Energy Symposium





TULSA, Okla. – Dec. 7, 2015 – ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) and ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will present at the Wells Fargo Energy Symposium in New York City, Dec. 8, 2015.





Terry K. Spencer, ONEOK and ONEOK Partners president and chief executive officer, will present at the conference at 2 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (1 p.m. Central Standard Time).





Spencer; Walter S. Hulse III, ONEOK and ONEOK Partners executive vice president, strategic planning and corporate affairs; and Derek S. Reiners, ONEOK and ONEOK Partners senior vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer, also will conduct a series of one-on-one meetings with investment-community representatives at the conference.





The conference will be webcast and will be accessible on both ONEOK’s and ONEOK Partners’ websit es, www.oneok.com and www.oneokpartners.com . A replay of the webcast will be archived for 30 days.





The materials used at the conference will be accessible on the ONEOK and ONEOK Partners websites beginning at 8 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (7 a.m. Central Standard Time) on Dec. 8, 2015.





ONEOK, Inc. (pronounced ONE-OAK) (NYSE: OKE ) is the general partner and as of Sept. 30, 2015, owns 41.2 percent of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS), one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, which owns one of the nation's premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent, Permian and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. ONEOK is a FORTUNE 500 company and is included in Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500 Stock Index.





For more information, visit the websites at www.oneok.com or www.oneokpartners.com .





For the latest news about ONEOK and ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKNews and @ONEOKPartners .





###
#### Alton Leo FRIDAY v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO.

No. 61882.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Alton Leo Friday applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Winn.

Writ denied. Result correct.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 791 Engrossed in House (EH)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 791

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the United States courthouse in Benton, Illinois, as the 
             ``James L. Foreman United States Courthouse''.





103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 791

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
 To designate the United States courthouse in Benton, Illinois, as the 
             ``James L. Foreman United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 301 West Main Street in 
Benton, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ``James L. 
Foreman United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, map, regulation, document, paper, or 
other record of the United States to the courthouse referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James L. Foreman 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
#### In the Matter of Richard Romanoff, Petitioner, v Kenneth J. Lange, as Judge of the Westchester County Court, et al., Respondents.

[721 NYS2d 821]

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Kenneth J. Lange, Judge of the County Court, Westchester County, dated July 6, 2000, which revoked the petitioner’s pistol licenses. Motion by the respondent Charlene Indelicato, County Attorney for the County of Westchester, to dismiss the proceeding against her.

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The determination to revoke the petitioner’s pistol licenses is supported by substantial evidence, and was neither arbitrary or capricious, nor an abuse of discretion *(see, Matter of Pell v*
      *552
      *Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222). The petitioner did not honestly answer the question on the application for renewal of his pistol licenses regarding whether he had been arrested since the time the original licenses were issued. Moreover, after affording the petitioner an opportunity to be heard regarding the County Attorney’s revocation application, the respondent Judge Lange found the petitioner’s explanation for his dishonesty to be incredible.

The County Attorney is not a proper party to this proceeding *(see,*Penal Law § 265.00 [10]; § 400.00 [1], [3], [10]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED ELSEWHERE IN THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                           9,155
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,076
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,262)
<INVENTORY>                                     78,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,186
<PP&E>                                         321,599
<DEPRECIATION>                               (127,541)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 605,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,007
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,245
<OTHER-SE>                                     180,019
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   605,235
<SALES>                                        374,158
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               374,158
<CGS>                                          218,993
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  320,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,292)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,457
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,126
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,155
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,971
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,971
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
        

</TABLE>
A

LL61 W011- WHA Y.Al

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

ALLEN J. HARRISON

NO. 2023 KW 1068

DECEMBER 4, 2023

In Re: Allen J. Harrison, applying for supervisory writs, 

22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, 

No. 612593. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

PMC

CHH

SMM
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 19, 2021

NO. 03

- 19

- 00129

- CV

Appellant, John Gordon// Cross

- Appellant, South Texas Youth Soccer Association, Inc.

v.

Appellee, South Texas Youth Soccer Associat ion, Inc.// Cross

- Appellee, John Gordon

APPEAL FROM THE 395TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

Ha ving reviewed the rec ord and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no

reversible error in the trial c ourt’s judgment

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s

judgment

. Each party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court a nd in

the court below.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Massey Energy Company (the “Company”) for the quarter ending
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Don L. Blankenship, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Don L.
      BlankenshipDon
      L. BlankenshipChairman,
      Chief Executive Officer andPresidentNovember
      7, 2008
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 4 A1 35 5 . CONFESOR CHAPARRO v . THE STATE.

I n 2004, Co nf

eso r Chap arro w as co nv ic ted o f f o u r c ou nts of aggrav ated c hild

mo lestatio n and on ap p eal, this Co urt af f irmed his c o nv ic tio ns. C

ha pa rro v

. S ta te , 27 9

Ga. A p p

. 1 45 (6 30 SE2d 645) (2006 ). 1 I n N o v ember 2023, Chap arro f iled a mo tio n to

v ac ate his sentenc e, c laiming that it w as illegal and theref o re v o id

. On D ec ember 1 4,

2023, the trial c o u rt entered an o rd er d enying t he mo tio n to v ac ate. Chap arro

su bsequ ently mo v e d to v ac ate the trial c ou rt’ s D ec ember 1 4 o rd e r, argu ing that he had

no t rec e iv ed no tic e of the same u ntil the d ead line f or f iling an ap p eal had p assed

. On

M arc h 19
, 2024, the trial c o u rt d enied that mo tio n. Chap arro f iled this d irec t ap p eal

o n A p ril 1 5, 2024, exp lic itly s eek ing to ap p eal o nly the D ec ember 1 4 o r d er. W e lac k

j u risd ic tio n.

A no tic e o f ap peal mu st be f iled w ithin 30 d ays o f entry of the j ud gment o r trial

c o u rt o r d er so u ght to be ap pealed

. OCGA § 5- 6 -38 (a). A nd the p ro p er and timely

f iling o f a no tic e o f ap peal is a n a b s o l u t e requ irement to co nf er j u risd ic tio n u p o n an

ap p ellate c o u rt. Redfo rd v. S ta te , 357 Ga. A p p

. 247
, 250 (850 SE2d 447 ) (2020). H ere,

1 Sinc e that time, Chap arro has f iled a nu mber of mo tio ns seek ing p o stc o nv ic tio n relief

, with t he trial co u rt d enying eac h of tho se mo tio ns. The trial c o u rt’ s

o rd ers resu lted in either an ap p lic atio n or a d irec t ap p eal to this Co u rt, eac h o f w hic h

w as either d enied o r d ismissed

. See Case N o s. A 22A 059 2 (ap p eal dismissed D ec

. 1 3,

2 0 2 1 ) ; A19 A16 4 3 ( ap peal dismissed A p ril 1 0, 201 9 ); A 1 7 A2057 ( ap p eal d ismissed J u l y

21
, 201 7 ); A 1 4D 0056 ( ap p lic a t io n d enied Oc t. 1 8, 201 3); A11A 1 86 2 (ap peal d ismissed J u ne 20, 201 1 ); A 08D 0343 (ap p lic atio n d ismissed M ay 2, 2008) ; A08D 01 1 1 (ap p lic atio n d ismissed N o v

. 1 9 , 2007 ). May 21, 2024Chap arro f

iled h i s n o t ic e o f ap p eal 1 23 d ays af ter entry of the D ec ember 1 4 o rd er

d e n y ing his mo tio n t o v ac a te his sentenc e. A c c o r d ingly, w e lac k j u r isd ic t i o n t o

c o nsid er this ap p eal, w hic h is hereby D ISM I SSED

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e , A t la n t a ,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t ify t ha t t h e a b o v e is a t

r u e e x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.

W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t

h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. 05/21/2024
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)January 22, 2016(Date of earliest event reported)January 21, 2016





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---




Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn January 21, 2016, we announced that the board of directors of our general partner, ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C., approved a cash distribution of 79 cents per unit for the fourth quarter 2015.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 8.01Other EventsOn January 21, 2016, the board of directors of our general partner, ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C., approved a cash distribution of 79 cents per unit for the fourth quarter 2015.  The fourth-quarter distribution is payable on February 12, 2016, to unitholders of record as of February 1, 2016.Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)ExhibitsExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated January 21, 2016.





2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:January 22, 2016By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer


3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated January 21, 2016.








4