alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
James River Bankshares, Inc.



We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-99156, 333-07997, 333-07999, and 333-61329) of James
River Bankshares, Inc. of our report dated January 13, 2000, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of James River Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 1999 and the related statements of income, shareholders' equity
and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31,
1999 Annual Report of James River Bankshares, Inc.

YOUNT, HYDE & BARBOUR, P.C.



50 South Cameron Street
Winchester, Virginia 22601
March 23, 2000
#### ALTERMAN TRANSPORT LINES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. EQUILEASE CORPORATION, a subsidiary of Eltra Corporation, a New York corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-84.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 25, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 19, 1972.

Preddy, Haddad, Kutner & Hardy, Miami, for appellant.

Smith, Mandler, Smith & Parker, and Joseph N. Unger, Miami Beach, for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Desandolo v. F & C Tractor and Equip. Co., Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 576; Accurate Metal Finishing Corp. v. Carmel, Fla.App.1971, 254 So.2d 556; Entron, Inc. v. General Cablevision of Palatka, 5th Cir.1970, 435 F.2d 995.
#### Tony SANSONE, Sr. v. Ralph POUND.

No. 49781.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 14, 1977.

Cunningham, Smith & Ferrell, William W. Smith, Booneville, for appellant.

Carnathan & Davidson, Douglas M. Wright, Tupelo, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lee County; L. T. Senter, Jr., Judge.

Before INZER, P. J., and WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### Mrs. J. C. ARON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 46980.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 13, 1972.

Billy R. Gibson, Bruce, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by J. B. Gar-retty, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pontotoc County; Fred Wicker, Judge.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and JONES, INZER, SUGG and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.
#### REGAL INDUSTRIES, S.A., a corporation, Appellant, v. JONATHAN LOGAN, INC., Appellee.

No. 76-2017.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 24, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 27, 1978.

Carey, Dwyer, Cole, Selwood & Bernard and Steven R. Berger, Miami, for appellant.

Kreeger & Kreeger, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL, (Ret.), Associate Judge.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, bring this appeal from an order of dismissal with prejudice of Count II of their second amended complaint as to appellee Jonathan Logan, Inc., defendant below, pursuant to its motion to dismiss.

The essence of appellants’ contention on appeal is that the trial court erred by dismissing Count II of appellants’ second amended complaint when it ruled that appellants were improperly pleading inconsistent facts or causes of action. We have carefully reviewed the record and have concluded that Count II of appellants’ second amended complaint did state a cause of action and, therefore, should not have been dismissed. See, e. g., *Curran & MacDonell, Inc.*v. *Pearre,*202 So.2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967); *Hines v. Trager Construction Co.,*188 So.2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966); *Ringler v. McVeigh,*109 So.2d 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959); and Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.110(g).

Reversed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 61

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals to designate

all or any portion of their income tax refund to reduce the public debt.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. BEREUTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals to designate all or any portion of their income

tax refund to reduce the public debt.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF OVERPAYMENTS FOR REDUC4 TION OF PUBLIC DEBT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter A of chapter 61 of the

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at

7 the end thereof the following new part:

8 ‘‘PART IX—DESIGNATION OF OVERPAYMENTS

9 FOR REDUCTION OF PUBLIC DEBT.

‘‘Sec. 6097. Designation.
2

•HR 61 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 6097. DESIGNATION.

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an individual, with

3 respect to each taxpayer’s return for the taxable year of

4 the tax imposed by chapter 1, such taxpayer may des5 ignate that a specified portion (not less than $1) of any

6 overpayment of tax for such taxable year shall be used

7 to reduce the public debt.

8 ‘‘(b) MANNER AND TIME OF DESIGNATION.—A des9 ignation under subsection (a) may be made with respect

10 to any taxable year only at the time of filing the return

11 of the tax imposed by chapter 1 for such taxable year.

12 Such designation shall be made in such manner as the

13 Secretary prescribes by regulations except that such des14 ignation shall be made either on the first page of the re15 turn or on the page bearing the taxpayer’s signature.

16 ‘‘(c) OVERPAYMENTS TREATED AS REFUNDED.—

17 For purposes of this title, any portion of an overpayment

18 of tax designated under subsection (a) shall be treated as

19 being refunded to the taxpayer as of the last date pre20 scribed for filing the return of tax imposed by chapter 1

21 (determined without regard to extensions) or, if later, the

22 date the return is filed.’’

23 (b) TRANSFERS TO ACCOUNT TO REDUCE PUBLIC

24 DEBT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall, from time

25 to time, transfer to the special account established by sec26 tion 3113(d) of title 31, United States Code, the amounts
3

•HR 61 IH

1 of the overpayments of tax to which designations under

2 section 6097 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 apply.

3 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of parts for

4 subchapter A of chapter 61 of such Code is amended by

5 adding at the end thereof the following new item:

‘‘Part IX. Designation of overpayments for reduction of public

debt.’’

6 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

7 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

8 December 31, 1992.

Æ
EXHIBIT 16.1

March 29, 2000



Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.  20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Our firm was previously the certifying accountants for Ansel Project, Inc. (the "Company") and reported on the financial statements of the Company for the period from April 9, 1998 (inception)
through April 30, 1998 and for the year ended April 30, 1999.

Effective December 1999, our appointment as principal accountants was terminated. We have read the Company's statements included under Item 4 of its Form 8-K dated March 29,
2000, and we agree with such statements, except that we have no personal knowledge of facts that would allow us to agree with the Company's statements that the change was approved by the Board of Directors or that Grant Thornton LLP was not engaged
regarding any matter requiring disclosure under Regulation S-K, Item 304(a)(2).



|Sincerely,                    | 
|----------------------------- | 
|/s/  CORDANO AND HARVEY, P.C. | 
|Cordano and Harvey, P.C.      | 
|                              |
#### Newco Realty Corp., Plaintiff, *v.*Becker *&*McKay Bros., Inc., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

October 10, 1952.

*Charles G. Ritter*for defendants.

*Alexander Berman*for plaintiff.

*529Hallinan, J.

Motion by defendants, pursuant to rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice, for an order dismissing the complaint herein on the ground that the alleged contract on which the cause of action is founded is unenforcible under the Statute of Frauds. (Personal Property Law, § 85.)

Plaintiff alleges that the corporate defendant owns a parcel of land and that on or about June 13,1951, the individual defendants offered to sell all of the capital stock of the defendant corporation for $130,000. Plaintiff further alleges that it accepted the offer on November 27, 1951. The writing upon which plaintiff relies to take the case out of the Statute of Frauds is a letter, dated June 13,1951, from the defendants to a broker. It is not a contract with the plaintiff nor signed by the plaintiff nor even addressed to the plaintiff. While it was signed by the defendants, it falls far short of the requirements for a memorandum under the Statute of Frauds. It does not name a specific buyer and is obviously only a listing with a broker to bring about a sale.

In *Irvmor Corp.*v. *Rodewald*(253 N. Y. 472, 475) the Court of Appeals said: C£ There is a settled rule of law that a note or memorandum of a contract for a sale of land must identify by name or description the parties to the transaction, a seller and a buyer.” (Citing authorities.) (See, also, *Raleigh Associates*v. *Henry,*302 N. Y. 467, 472.) While the instant contract involved the sale of stock rather than land the rule with respect to the sufficiency of the memorandum is the same.

The case of *Goldblatt*v. *Rosenwasser*(301 N. Y. 579) cited by the plaintiff is not to the contrary. There both parties to the contract were ascertained because each *“*had signed separate but similar copies of the ” memorandum.

The motion is granted. Submit order.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Toggle navigationUtility (Top) navigationAbout Us ForwardBackAbout UsMission & VisionLeadershipOur OrganizationOur FacilitiesRegionsLaws & Regulations ForwardBackLaws & RegulationsLaws, Agreements & TreatiesHunting RegulationsLibrary ForwardBackLibraryCategoriesCollectionsHomeServices ForwardBackServicesDuck Stamps ForwardBackDuck StampsBuy a Duck Stamp or E-StampBuy a Junior Duck StampFish StockingImporting & ExportingConsultation & Technical Assistance ForwardBackConsultation & Technical AssistanceESA Section 7 ConsultationHabitat Conservation Planning (HCPs)Candidate Conservation Agreements (CCA & CCAA)Safe Harbour Agreements (SHA)Conservation BankingCoastal Barrier Resources Act Project ConsultationCoastal Barrier Resources System Property DocumentationFinancial AssistanceSpecies ManagementInvestigational New Animal Drugs (INADS)PermitsSearch All ServicesDuck Stamps One of the easiest ways that anyone can support bird habitat conservation is by buying duck stamps.Species ForwardBackSpeciesExplore Taxonomic TreeFind a SpeciesInterest story Bats: “The Coolest Mammals on Earth”Visit Us ForwardBackVisit UsEventsRecreation PassesOutdoor RecreationWhere to HuntWhere to FishOur LocationsScenic Drives Tour routes of great scenic drives on National Wildlife Refuges.Get Involved ForwardBackGet InvolvedCareers and InternshipsVolunteeringFriends PartnershipsLearning OpportunitiesEducation ProgramsEventsPartnerships ForwardBackPartnershipsPartnership CategoriesPartner ListVolunteer Search for volunteer opportunities around the countryNewsroom ForwardBackNewsroomPress ReleasesCongressional TestimonyMedia ContactsWild Things News about wonderful wild things and placesInitiatives ForwardBackInitiativesCombating Wildlife TraffickingDirector's PrioritiesClimate ChangeHuntingFishingInvasive SpeciesPollinatorsProtecting WildlifeClimate Action FWS is taking steps to mitigate climate impactsI want to ForwardBackI Want ToReport Wildlife CrimeDo Business with FWSVolunteerFind a Job or InternshipVisit a RefugeBuy a Duck StampApply for a PermitFind FundingFind TrainingWild work Search employment opportunities with USFWSSearchSearchSearchEnter the terms you wish to search for. ×  Abernathy Fish Technology Center
 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service LogoWorking with others to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people.Footer Menu - EmploymentCareers & InternshipsContractingFooter Menu - Site LinksLeadershipFrequently Asked QuestionsContact FWSFooter Menu - LegalAccessibilityFreedom of Information ActNoticesPrivacy PolicyDisclaimersInformation QualityVulnerability Disclosure PolicyFooter Menu - External LinksDOIUSA.GOV




You are exiting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service website You are being directed to We do not guarantee that the websites we link to comply with Section 508 (Accessibility Requirements) of the Rehabilitation Act. Links also do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. I Understand. Take me there. Cancel
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Michael BURGE v. Honorable Louis G. DESONIER, Jr., Judge, Section A, 24th Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson.

No. 62648.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: Michael Burge applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Jefferson.

Application granted; except that the Court will appoint counsel to represent applicant on application for rehearing.

Previous action by this Court denying rehearing is set aside, having been improvident in light relator’s not having been represented by counsel, and in light of relator’s having timely sought a rehearing and appointment of counsel.

On Application for Rehearing

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Arthur G. Kingsmill be and he is hereby appointed counsel to represent the defendant in connection with his application for rehearing presently pending before this Honorable Court.
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 31028 Su m m ar y Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. LUC I EN J . TRAM M ELL , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he W es t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 5: 08- C R - 54- 1 B ef ore B E N AV ID E S , P R A D O an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e att orneyapp oi n t ed to represent L u ci en J. T ram m el lha s m oved f or l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d er s v . Ca lif o rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 19 67 ) . Tr am m e l lha s no tf i l e d ar e s po ns e . Ouri nde pe nde nt r e v ie w o f th e re c o r d a n d co u n s e l’ s b r ie f d is c lo s e s n o n o n fr iv o lo u s i ssu e for a p p e a l. A c c o r d in g ly , c o u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is G R A N T E D , co u n s e l is e x c u s e d f

r o m f u r t h e rr e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e AP P EA L I S DI S M I S S ED . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 23, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Massey Energy Company (the
Company) for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric B. Tolbert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|             |  |                                           
|------------ |  | ------------------------------------------
|May 10, 2006 |  | /s/ Eric B. Tolbert                       
|             |  | Eric B. Tolbert                           
|             |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Paul MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee.

No. 46838.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April *17,*1972.

Donald Franks, Booneville, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Timmie Hancock, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Sheinberg, Samuel I.

From:

Sent: Friday, May 21, 2021 2:52 PM

To: Walsh, Kathryn E.; Sheinberg, Samuel |.; Six, Anne; Whitehead, Nora; Musick, Vesselina
Subject: FW: Question regarding control - CUI

From: Berg, Karen E. <KBERG@ftc.gov>

Sent: Friday, May 21, 2021 2:51:53 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To:

Cc: >

Subject: RE: Question regarding control - CUI

Confirmed.

From:
Sent: Friday, May 21, 120: U5: astern Time (US & Canada)

>

: Question regarding contro!

We would appreciate your confirmation that the transaction described below is exempt pursuant to 802.51(b) because
none of the Purchasers — all of whom are Foreign Issuers -- will acquire control of Foreign Issuer X:

« Foreign Issuer X is a Luxembourg incorporated entity.

* The transaction involves the acquisition by Purchasers — Foreign Issuers A-E — combined of 66% of Foreign
Issuer X’s voting securities.

¢ Each of the Purchasers is (a) incorporated outside the United States, (b) its own Ultimate Parent Entity, and (c) an
associate of a UK headquartered private debt manager.

¢ No Purchaser will hold 50% or more of Foreign Issuer X’s voting securities.

e A Shareholders Agreement provides that the Purchasers’ Group (defined to include the Purchasers collectively) is
entitled to appoint 2 of the 3 members of the board of Foreign Issuer X. Because the Shareholders Agreement
does not provide that any of Foreign Issuers A, B, C, D or E has the right to appoint 2 of the 3 board members,
none of Foreign Issuers A, B, C, D, or E has the right to appoint 50% or more of the board so none is acquiring
control. This is true regardless of the fact that Foreign Issuers A, B, C, D, and E are all ultimately managed by
Management LuxCo and ultimately advised by Jersey General Partner.

assistance.
Exhibit 99.1





November 11, 2013Analyst Contact:Andrew Ziola918-588-7163Media Contact:Brad Borror918-588-7582








ONEOK to Participate in Jefferies Global Energy Conference





TULSA, Okla. –  Nov. 11, 2013 – ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) will present at the Jefferies Global Energy Conference on Tuesday, Nov. 12, 2013, in Houston, Texas.





Terry K. Spencer, ONEOK president, will present at the conference on Tuesday, Nov. 12, at 12:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (11:30 a.m. Central Standard Time).





The conference will be webcast and will be accessible on ONEOK’s website, www.oneok.com.  A replay of the webcast will be archived for 30 days.





ONEOK also will post the presentation on its website that morning at 8 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (7 a.m. Central Standard Time).








ONEOK, Inc. (pronounced ONE-OAK) (NYSE: OKE) is a diversified energy company.  We are the general partner and as of Sept. 30, 2013, own 41.3 percent of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS), one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, which is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. ONEOK is among the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, serving more than 2 million customers in Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas.  ONEOK is a FORTUNE 500 company and is included in Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Stock Index.





For more information, visit the website at www.oneok.com .





For the latest news about ONEOK, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKNews .








# # #
Exhibit 21 

                      LIBERTY FINANCIAL COMPANIES, INC. 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY 

Subsidiary                                                    Immediate Parent 
----------                                                    ---------------- 
The Colonial Group, Inc. ("CGI")*                             The Company 
Liberty Newport Holdings, Limited ("LNHL")                    The Company 
Liberty Financial Services, Inc. ("LFS")*                     The Company 
Independent Holdings, Inc. ("IHI")                            The Company 
SteinRoe Services, Inc. ("SSI")*                              The Company 
Liberty Real Estate Group, Inc.                               The Company 
The PAMCO Group, Inc.                                         The Company 
Stein Roe & Farnham Incorporated ("Stein Roe")*               SSI 
Keyport Life Insurance Company ("Keyport")*                   SSI 
SteinRoe Futures, Inc.                                        Stein Roe 
Keyport Financial Services Corp.                              Keyport 
Keyport Advisory Services Corp.                               Keyport 
Independence Life & Annuity Company*                          Keyport 
Colonial Advisory Services, Inc.                              CGI 
Colonial Management Associates, Inc. ("CMA")*                 CGI 
Colonial Investors Service Center, Inc.*                      CGI 
Colonial Investment Services, Inc.*                           CGI 
Newport Pacific Management, Inc. ("NPMI")*                    LNHL 
Newport Fund Management, Inc.*                                NPMI 
Liberty Asset Management Company                              LFS 
Liberty Investment Services, Inc. ("LIS")                     LFS 
Copley Venture Capital, Inc.                                  LFS 
Liberty Financial Advisors, Inc.                              LIS 
Liberty Securities Corporation*                               LIS 
LSC Insurance Agency of Arizona, Inc.                         LIS 
LSC Insurance Agency of Maine, Inc.                           LIS 
LSC Insurance Agency of New Mexico, Inc.                      LIS 
LSC Insurance Agency of Nevada, Inc.                          LIS 
Financial Centre Insurance Agency, Inc.                       LIS 
Independent Financial Marketing Group, Inc. ("IFMG")*         IHI 
Independent Financial Securities, Inc.                        IFMG 
IFS Agencies, Inc.                                            IFMG 
IFS Agencies of Alabama, Inc.                                 IFMG 
IFS Agencies of New Mexico, Inc.                              IFMG 
IFMG of Maine, Inc.                                           IFMG 

* Significant Subsidiaries, as defined in SEC Regulation S-X.
EXHIBIT 11
                                                        

                         COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

(Amounts in thousands except                 Periods Ended               
 per share amounts)
                                    June 14,1997   June 15,1996  
             
PRIMARY

NET INCOME                             $ 95,259         $89,437
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON
  SHARES AND OTHER COMMON
  STOCK EQUIVALENTS:
       COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING         468,973         471,722
       STOCK OPTIONS                        719             269 
                                        469,692         471,991  
 
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE (*)         $    .20       $     .19 

FULLY DILUTED

NET INCOME                              $95,259         $89,437  
ELIMINATION OF INTEREST EXPENSE,
 NET OF RELATED TAX EFFECT,
 APPLICABLE TO 5% CONVERTIBLE
 SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES DUE 2003         2,625           1,614 
ADJUSTED INCOME APPLICABLE TO
 COMMON STOCK                           $97,884         $91,051 
                                                                          
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON
  SHARES AND OTHER COMMON
  STOCK EQUIVALENTS:
        COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING        468,973         471,722 
        STOCK OPTIONS                       719             561
        SHARES ISSUABLE UPON
        CONVERSION OF 5% CONVERTIBLE
        SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES DUE
        2003                  				        14,440          14,557
                                         484,132         486,840       


FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE (*)   $     .20      $     .19        


(*) NOTE:  Dilution is less than 3%.  Therefore, common stock equivalents
    have been excluded from the total weighted average common shares.