alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

** **

FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FirstHartford Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I Neil H. Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant toss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and  results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ NeilH. Ellis

NeilH. Ellis

Presidentand Chief Executive Officer

 

Date: March 31, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-QSB of General  Devices,  Inc. for the nine months ended  September  30,
1999 and is qulified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.


</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000040528
<NAME>                                         GENERAL DEVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000




<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                   82
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         82
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           82
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     2
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                100
<OTHER-SE>                                              (20)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             82
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            26
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (26)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (26)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (26)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.003)



</TABLE>
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f App eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it No. 04-2563 MICRO SIGNAL RESEARCH, INC. Plaintiff, Appellee,

v. NURI OTUS and MAUREEN CUNNINGHAM, Defendants, Appellants.

__________ CUPERTINO NATIONAL BANK & TRUST,

Trustee.

ERRATA The opinion of this court issued July 19, 2005, is amended as follows: On page 4, line 3, replace "Otis" with "Otus". On page 6, line 3, footnote 2 should be moved next to "veil."
#### Smiley Vincent KEENE v. STATE.

No. 38985.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased Equipment Costs:

Tanks

Purchased Equipment Costs are the sum of the following cost elements:

(1) Pump Costs

(2) Tank Costs

(3) Chemical Feed System Costs

(4) Mixer Costs

(5) Clarifier Costs

(6) Filter Press Costs

(7) Sand Filter Costs

Each cost component includes the cost of freight and associated ancillary equipment such as piping, valves, and 

controllers.

This telephone contact report supports EPA’s development of cost element (2) by documenting EPA's 

communication with a vendor regarding purchase costs and information for tanks used in the Steam Electric 

cost model.
Project No.: 0172.08.029.044 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: Steam/Cost/Compliance Modeling

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

 Outgoing Call

Date: 06/28/2011 Time: 7:30 am PDT

Company Name: Bendel Tank & Heat Exchanger Corporation

 

Contact Name: Vince Petrucci

Phone No : (704)-596-5112

Name: Kavya Kasturi ERG

GENERAL SUBJECT: Vendor cost request for carbon steel shop-built tanks for a chemical precipitation wastewater treatment system.

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On June 28, 2011 at 7:30 am I contacted Mr. Vince Petrucci. I explained to Mr. Petrucci that we are working 

on conceptual level costing of a chemical precipitation wastewater treatment system to treat FGD (flue gas 

desulfurization) wastewater from steam electric power plants, and as a part of this project we are trying to 

collect cost information on different components or units of a chemical precipitation system.

I told Mr. Petrucci that we are interested in shop-built carbon steel tanks. I requested information such as 

purchase cost, cost for ancillary equipments and power consumption (if applicable). Mr. Petrucci stated that the 

maximum tank size they offer is approximately 70,000 gallons, which corresponds to a tank diameter of 15 feet 

and height of 60 feet. Mr. Petrucci indicated that he would provide cost information via email.
Exhibit 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                   -----------------------------------------


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Sel-Leb Marketing, Inc.


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement (No. 333-19625) on Form S-8 which
was previously filed by Sel-Leb Marketing, Inc. (the "Company") of our report
on the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiary,
dated May 10, 2001, which report appears elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.

                                                 /s/ J.H. Cohn LLP
                                                 -----------------
                                                     J.H. Cohn LLP

Roseland, New Jersey
May 11, 2001
#### Martin B. ZIDE v. STATE.

No. 38769.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Aug. 1969.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 12,1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
Exhibit 99.1








December 3, 2013Analyst Contact:T.D. Eureste918-588-7167Media Contact:Brad Borror918-588-7582








ONEOK to Participate in BMO Capital Markets


Utilities and Pipelines Day





TULSA, Okla. – Dec. 3, 2013 – ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) will participate in the 9 th Annual BMO Capital Markets Utilities and Pipelines Day in New York City on Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2013.





Terry K. Spencer, ONEOK and ONEOK Partners president; Pierce H. Norton II, ONEOK and ONEOK Partners executive vice president, commercial; and Curtis L. Dinan, ONEOK Partners senior vice president, natural gas, will conduct a series of meetings with investment-community representatives at the conference.





The materials utilized at the conference will be accessible on the ONEOK, Inc. website, www.oneok.com , on Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2013, beginning at 8 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (7 a.m. Central Standard Time).








ONEOK, Inc. (pronounced ONE-OAK) (NYSE: OKE) is a diversified energy company.  We are the general partner and as of Sept. 30, 2013, own 41.3 percent of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS), one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, which is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers.  ONEOK is among the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, serving more than 2 million customers in Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas.  ONEOK is a FORTUNE 500 company and is included in Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Stock Index.





For more information, visit the website at www.oneok.com .





For the latest news about ONEOK, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKNews .








# # #
#### Bill L. BRYANT, Petitioner, v. W. Rogers TURNER, Judge, etc. and Rom W. Powell, County Solicitor, etc., Respondents.

No. 39876.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 29, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL, and ADKINS, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                  SCOLR, Inc.
                       3625 - 132nd Avenue SE, Ste.  300
                              Bellevue, WA  98006
                             Phone:  (425) 373-0171
                           Facsimile:  (425) 373-0181

                                 March 2, 2004


Michael Tag1ich
Tag/Kent Partners
c/o Taglich Brothers
1370 6th Avenue
New York, NY 10019

RE:     Securities Purchase Agreement by and among SCOLR, Inc.  and the
    Purchasers named therein dated as of February 24, 2004 (the "Agreement")

Dear Michael:

The purpose of this letter is to amend the Agreement to increase the Per Share
Purchase Price to $3.63 with respect to the 9,631 Shares to be purchased by
Michael Taglich and the 40,000 Shares to be purchased by Tag/Kent Partners.
Capitalized terms used in this letter shall have the meanings assigned in the
Agreement.  Except as set forth herein, the Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect.

Please confirm your agreement with the terms of this letter on behalf of
yourself, individually, and on behalf of Tag/Kent Partners by signing the
enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to me.

                               Very truly yours,

                                  SCOLR, Inc.

                              /s/ Daniel O. Wilds
                                Daniel O. Wilds
                               CEO and President

Accepted and Agreed To This
2nd day of March, 2004.  :


/s/ Michael Taglich                            /s/ Michael Taglich
--------------------                           -------------------
Michael Taglich, Individually                  Michael Taglich, General Partner
                                               Tag/Kent Partners


AMM:amh
#### Luis HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-977.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 14, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 28231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12979]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 6, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Mark A. Rauzi, Vice 
President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. John H. Dammermann, Fort Myers, Florida; to acquire voting 
shares of First BancShares, Inc. and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of Granite Community Bank, both of Cold Spring, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 13, 2018.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-12979 Filed 6-15-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 12

- 00047

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R .P. AND E.A.P., CHIL DREN ,

From the 264th District Court Bell County, Texas Trial Court No. 250472

- D

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).
It states that Appellant mistakenly appealed to this Court when, because he was
appealing from a district court in Bell County, he should have appealed to the Third
Court of Appeals. 1

Because this Court lacks jurisdiction o f an appeal from a district court in Bell
County, which is within the jurisdiction of the Third Court of Appeals, we grant
Appellant’s motion in part and dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See T EX

.

G OV ’ T

. C ODE A NN

. §§ 22.22 0 ( a ) , 22.201(c, k ) ( W est Supp. 20 11)

.

1 The Court notified Appellant of the jurisdictional problem in a February 14, 2012 letter.In the Interest of R.P. and E.A.P., Children Page 2 REX D. DAVIS Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion granted in part; appeal dismissed Opini on delivered and filed February 22, 2012 [CV06]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-31027 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SANTOS CANDELO-MOSQUERA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:04-CR-60041-ALL

-------------------- Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Santos Candelo-Mosquera (Candelo) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Candelo has not filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel isNo. 05-31027 -2- excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
June 24, 2002




Office of the Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


Dear Sir/Madam:

     The  representations  made in this letter are based  solely on  discussions
with and  representations  from the engagement partner and manager on the audits
of the financial  statements of Dobson  Communications  Corporation  for the two
most recent fiscal years.  Those  individuals are no longer with Arthur Andersen
LLP.

     We have read the Item 4 included in the Report on Form 8-K,  dated June 21,
2002 of Dobson Communications  Corporation,  to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission,  and  have  found  no  basis  for  disagreement  with  the
statements contained therein.

                                Very truly yours,



                                /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.3

                             ENGAGEMENT OF SERVICES

May 1,2000

Enterprise CyberSystems Inc.
Park City, Utah
Attention:  Kim Gourley

Dear Sirs:

         Re: Terms of Engagement

This letter confirms our understanding of the terms of your engagement by us.

1.       MegaChain.com Ltd. (the "Company") is the owner and holder of certain
         technology and proprietary intellectual property, including, without
         limitation, copyrights, patents, trademarks, trade secrets, business
         plans and know how relating to a Products and services which combine
         as a system which gives exposure to internet web-sites and
         advertisements through an automated multi-level system of marketing
         whereby an agent will receive financial incentives to register as
         agent and email the client's Webpage to friends and acquaintances (the
         "System").

2.       The System was developed to enable the Company to carry on business as
         a service bureau for vendors who desire to promote their business
         through agents utilizing the System through the Company's servers. The
         vendor's agents would be tracked and serviced by the Company.

3.       The Company has modified its objectives and requires that the System
         be capable of being used and operated by licensees independent of the
         Company yet on the Company's servers. To this end, the software
         component of the System (the "software") requires modifications to
         enable the Company to run multiple databases on the same servers.

4.       We wish to retain your services to assess the following aspects of the
         software:
         Platform
         Methodology
         Interactive Development Environment (IDE)
         Database Architecture
         Technical Architecture
         Quality Management
         Functionality


<PAGE>   2


                                       2


5.       In addition to the above we would like you to:

         (a) address the question of cost and time frame for recreating the
         software; and

         (b) estimate the approximate costs to create the next stage of
         features referred to in paragraph 3 above.

6.       The estimated cost of your above services is US$25,000.00.

As you are aware, the Company does not have sufficient capital to pay you for
your services. As such, we propose to pay you in shares of the Company based on
a price of Ten Cents ($.10) per share.

Please indicate your agreement to these terms by completing the acceptance on
the accompanying copy of this letter and returning it to us.

Yours very truly,

MegaChain.com Ltd.

/s/ TOM LAVIN

per: Tom Lavin, president



TO:  MegaChain.com, Ltd.,

The terms of engagement in this letter are accepted.

                                             ENTERPRISE CYBERSYSTEMS, INC

            1-24-00                                 /s/ KIM GOURLEY
--------------------------------             ------------------------------
Date:                                        Kim Gourley- president
## SUPREME COURT OF THE S TATE OF NEW YORK



## Ap p e lla te Div isio n , Fo urth J ud i c i a l De p a rtm e n t

114 CA 14-00926 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NIRAV R. SHAH, M.D., M.P.H., COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (VICTOR PALADINO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS.
WHITEMAN, OSTERMAN & HANNA LLP, ALBANY (CHRISTOPHER E. BUCKEY OF COUNSEL), AND NANCY ROSE STORMER, P.C., UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Appeal and cross appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Hugh A. Gilbert, J.), entered February 27, 2014 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action. The judgment, among other things, annulled the determination of respondents-defendants and directed respondents-defendants to allow petitioner-plaintiff’s claims for reimbursement. It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying the petition-complaint inits entirety, and by granting judgment in favor of respondentsdefendants as follows:

It is ADJUDGED and DECLARED that section 61 of part D of section 1 of chapter 56 of the Laws of 2012 has not been shown to be unconstitutional, and as modified the judgment is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of County of Chautauqua v Shah (___ AD3d ____ [Mar. 20, 2015]).

Entered: March 20, 2015 F rances E. Cafarell C lerk of the Court
# Official Journal L 422/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 422 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6426 November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 422

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6426 November 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2058 of 23 November 2021 authorising Italy to apply a reduced rate of taxation to electricity supplied directly to vessels, other than private pleasure craft, at berth in a port | 1 |
| | * | Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2021/2059 of 23 November 2021 on the reconfirmation of the authorisation of the European Union military operation in the Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI) (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI/5/2021) | 3 |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | UN Regulation No 153 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to fuel system integrity and safety of electric power train in the event of a rear-end collision [2021/2060] | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2058 of 23 November 2021 authorising Italy to apply a reduced rate of taxation to electricity supplied directly to vessels, other than private pleasure craft, at berth in a port

1

*

Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2021/2059 of 23 November 2021 on the reconfirmation of the authorisation of the European Union military operation in the Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI) (EUNAVFOR MED IRINI/5/2021)

3

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

UN Regulation No 153 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to fuel system integrity and safety of electric power train in the event of a rear-end collision [2021/2060]

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.