alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BRAZE GILMORE, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CR-95-34, CA-97-125-R)

Submitted: April 21, 1998 Decided: June 2, 1998

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Braze Gilmore, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Gilmore, Nos. CR-95-34; CA-97-125-R (W.D.

Va. Nov. 17, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
##### 



Exhibit 12 Statement re: Computation of Ratios BancWest Corporation and Subsidiaries
Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges Three Months Ended March 31,2005
    
    
    2004(Dollars in thousands)Income before income taxes
    
    
    $214,027
    
    
    
    $184,717Fixed charges (1):Interest expense
    
    
    163,805
    
    
    
    96,126Rental expense
    
    
    4,520
    
    
    
    4,069168,325
    
    
    
    100,195Less interest on deposits
    
    
    80,941
    
    
    
    43,436Net fixed charges
    
    
    87,384
    
    
    
    56,759Earnings, excluding interest on deposits
    
    
    $301,411
    
    
    
    $241,476Earnings, including interest on deposits
    
    
    $382,352
    
    
    
    $284,912Ratio of earnings to fixed charges:Excluding interest on deposits
    
    
    3.45x
    
    
    
    4.25xIncluding interest on deposits
    
    
    2.27x
    
    
    
    2.84x
   (1)
    
    For purposes of computing the consolidated ratios of earnings to fixed charges,
earnings represent income before income taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges, excluding
interest on deposits, include interest (other than on deposits), whether expensed or
capitalized, and that portion of rental expense (generally one third) deemed representative of
the interest factor. Fixed charges, including interest on deposits, consists of the foregoing
items plus interest on deposits.
|Exhibit 31(d)                                                                                      
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification                                                             
|I, Moray P. Dewhurst, Chief Financial Officer of Florida Power & Light Company (FPL), certify that:
|1.                                                                                                 
|2.                                                                                                 
|3.                                                                                                 
|4.                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|5.                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|Date:   November 2, 2004                                                                           
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 2, 2015














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.





(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---




Item 8.01   Other Events





The following is a summary of assets under management as of May 31, 2015 of Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (in millions):





By Investment VehicleProprietary funds$10,819Sub-advised funds746Institutional accounts5,230Total$16,795





By Investment StrategySmall Cap$1,626Small-Mid Cap1,834Large Cap8,091Select (All Cap)553Long-Short4,412Strategic Income279Total$16,795








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:June 2, 2015By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
# C_2020103EN.01000101.xml

| 30.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2020/C 103/01)

Last publication

OJ C 95, 23.3.2020

Past publications

OJ C 87, 16.3.2020

OJ C 77, 9.3.2020

OJ C 68, 2.3.2020

OJ C 61, 24.2.2020

OJ C 54, 17.2.2020

OJ C 45, 10.2.2020

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
----

UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington D.C. 20549FORM 10-Q/A**Amendment No. 1 to Current Report**

GBC has filed an amended Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2002.  The purpose of the filing was to correctthe PDF document attached to the original filing, which will enable users toprint a complete copy of this report.  There have been no changes to the10-Q as originally filed on May 14, 2002.

**QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2002**
Commission File Number 0-2604**GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION**(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)**36-0887470**(I.R.S. employer identification No.)**Delaware(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)**One GBC Plaza,Northbrook, Illinois  60062**(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)**(847) 272-3700**(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes    X   ****No ____

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the close of the latest practicable date.
 **Outstanding at**Class**May 7, 2002
Common Stock, $0.125 par value
13,445,792
Class B Common Stock, $0.125 par value
       2,398,275** **********
#### WILKINS v. TEBBETTS.

No. 38198.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion. 216 So.2d 477.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
IN RE: NUVASIVE, IN C., Appellant

______________________

2015

- 1839, 2015

- 1840

______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trad emark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No s

. IPR2014

- 00073, IPR2014

- 00074.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

M ICHAEL T. R OSATO , Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant. Also repr esented by A NDREW S WANSON B ROWN
, S ONJA R OCHELLE G ERRARD ; G RACE J. P AK
, P AUL D AVID T RIPODI
, II , Los Angeles, CA; R ICHARD T ORCZON , Washington, DC.

S ARAH E. C RAVEN , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by N ATHAN K. K ELLEY
, T HOMAS W. K RAUSE
, J OSEPH M ATAL
, S COTT W EIDENFELLER

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been he ard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK
, O’M ALLEY
, and T ARANTO
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 10, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Massey Energy Company (the
Company) for the quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric B. Tolbert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                 |  |                                           
|---------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|November 9, 2006 |  | /s/ Eric B. Tolbert                       
|                 |  | Eric B. Tolbert                           
|                 |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Mark Meyers, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Steven M. Levine, Doing Business as Levine Garage, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Steven M. Levine, appellant pro se.Mark Meyers, respondent pro se.</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Town of New Windsor, Orange County (Richard W. Thorpe, J.), entered October 6, 2015. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $330.16.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to recover damages incurred as the result of defendant's allegedly defective repair of plaintiff's vehicle. After a nonjury trial, the Justice Court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $330.16.</p><p>In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (UJCA 1807; <i>see</i> UJCA 1804; <i>Ross v Friedman</i>, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125, 126 [2000]). Furthermore, the determination of a trier of fact as to issues of credibility is given substantial deference, as a trial court's opportunity to observe and evaluate the testimony and demeanor of the witnesses affords it a better perspective from which to assess their credibility (<i>see Vizzari v State of New York</i>, 184 AD2d 564 [1992]; <i>Kincade v Kincade</i>, 178 AD2d 510, 511 [1991]). This deference applies with greater force to judgments rendered in the Small Claims Part of the court (<i>see Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d at 126).</p><p>As the Justice Court's determination is supported by the record and provides the parties with substantial justice (<i>see</i> UJCA 1804, 1807), the judgment is affirmed.</p><p>Tolbert, J.P., Garguilo and Brands, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: September 28, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
257 La. 159

#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Henry G. NEYREY, Jr. et al.

No. 51018.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Application Not Considered:

The defendants-appellees apply for cer-tiorari to review the overruling by the court of appeal of their motion to dismiss the plaintiff-appellant’s appeal.

This court will not consider an application for a writ to review a judgment of the court of appeal until an application for rehearing has been refused by that court. La.Const. Art. VII, Section 11. The intermediate court will not consider an application for rehearing as to its judgment overruling a motion to dismiss an appeal. Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, Rule XI, Section 6 (1963). See similar rule of this court, Supreme Court Rule XI, Section 4 (1962).

The essential reason for these rules is that such is an interlocutory, not a final, judgment of the court of appeal. See: Suarez v. Suarez, 158 La. 682, 104 So. 616 (1924), State v. White, 156 La. 770, 101 So. 136 (1924); Gagneaux v. Desonier, 109 La. 460, 33 So. 561 (1901); Succession of Edwards, 34 La.Ann. 216, 221 (1882).

As these decisions indicate, when a party is aggrieved by an erroneous overruling of his motion to dismiss an appeal, the rule of court does not permit him to apply for rehearing as to the interlocutory judgment to this effect. Nevertheless, when the appellate court enters its final judgment disposing of the appeal, the party is entitled at that time to seek review by application for rehearing (and, if that is denied by an intermediate court, by writ of review) of the allegedly erroneous ruling. Before final adjudication, the appellate court is empowered to correct such an erroneous interlocutory ruling. Kinchen v. Kinchen, 256 La. 28, 235 So.2d 81 (1970); Hamilton v. Creditors, 51 La.Ann. 1035, 25 So. 965 (1898); State ex rel. Leche v. Fowler, 42 La.Ann. 144, 7 So. 180 (1890).

An interlocutory judgment denying a motion to dismiss an appeal must, of course, be distinguished from any judgment finally disposing of the appeal before the appellate court whether or not it disposes of the litigation on its merits. The latter is reviewable by timely application for a rehearing. (Frederick v. Brown Funeral Homes, 222 La. 57, 62 So.2d 100, 1952; State ex rel. Gerson v. Richardson, 37 La.Ann. 261, 1885; Cloud v. Cloud, 127 So.2d 560, 571-572, La.App. 3rd Cir. 1961), and, if such is denied by the court of appeal, by writ of review by this court, La.Const. Art. VII, Section 11. (As a matter of practice, however, this court does not usually review *528court of appeal judgments which remand the case for further proceedings.)

The present being an interlocutory judgment of the court of appeal overruling a motion to dismiss the appeal, the application for certiorari to review it is premature. Our refusal is without prejudice to applicants’ right to re-urge these contentions here, after a denial of a timely application for rehearing as to the ultimate judgment of the intermediate court disposing of the appeal.

Application not considered.
#### Orion D. HARTSELL v. HOOKER CHEMICAL CORP. et al.

No. 54487.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 5, 1974.

In re: Hooker Chemical Corp., Hooker Chemicals of Taft, Inc., and Twin City Fire Insurance Company applying for cer-tiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. Charles. 288 So.2d417. ■

Denied. Under the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.
Exhibit 4.1

                            CORONADO INDUSTRIES, INC.
                      16929 E. Enterprise Drive, Suite 202
                            Fountain Hills, AZ 85268


                                  July 16, 2001


Coronado Employees and Consultants,

     The  Company's  Board of  Directors  has decided to make  available  to all
employees and consultants,  shares of the Company's common stock at the price of
90% of the lowest  closing  bid price  during  the week prior to the  employee's
payday.

     To participate  in this program,  all you have to do is execute this letter
in the space below,  and indicate the amount of wages you wish to have allocated
to this Plan and the pay period from which your salary  will be  credited.  Your
free-trading shares will be delivered to you within a few days.


                                        Coronado Industries, Inc.


                                        By: /s/ Gary R. Smith
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Gary R. Smith, President



     ------------------------------         ------------------------------
     Amount of Wages                        Employee Signature


     ------------------------------         ------------------------------
     Pay Period From                        Name of Employee
     Which To Be Paid                       (Please Print)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
          EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT JUNE 30, 1997,
          THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, THE CONSOLIDATED
          STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW AND THE RELATED NOTES FOR THE SIX
          MONTH PERIOD THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
          BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         16,097
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,299
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                    14,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               49,069
<PP&E>                                          2,834
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 52,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,601
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           75
<OTHER-SE>                                     37,824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   52,500
<SALES>                                        21,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               21,243
<CGS>                                          13,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  13,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                8,096
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (199)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (68)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (131)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (131)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.02)
 
        

</TABLE>