alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Annual Report of MDSI Mobile Data  Solutions  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Verne
D.  Pecho,  the Vice  President  Finance &  Administration  and Chief  Financial
Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                    /s/ Verne D. Pecho
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Vice President Finance & Administration
                                    and Chief Financial Officer

                                    March 30, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         828,478
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,499,915
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,450,954)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,099,244
<PP&E>                                       5,818,930
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,028,768)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,162,160
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,766,353
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,738
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,750,277)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,162,160
<SALES>                                     46,588,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,588,496
<CGS>                                       34,481,128
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,481,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            23,724,002
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,726,929
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,022,284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,635,233)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,345,311
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (14,980,544)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,980,544)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.46)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit D

Case 2:23-cv-00026 Document 1-4 Filed 03/16/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 35
1

Case 2:23-cv-00026 Document 1-4 Filed 03/16/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 36
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

December 10, 2015 Session

JAMES R. STERCHI, JR. v. LOUIS B. SAVARD, JR., AS EXECUTOR OF 

THE ESTATE OF L. BASIL SAVARD, SR.

 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradley County

No. V12500 Don R. Ash, Senior Judge

No. E2015-00928-COA-R3-CV-FILED-MARCH 11, 2016

 

THOMAS R. FRIERSON, II, J., concurring.

I concur fully in the majority’s decision in this case. I write separately solely to 

express my opinion that inasmuch as this action was initiated subsequent to July 1, 2011, 

the standard of review for summary judgment delineated in Tennessee Code Annotated § 

20-16-101 (Supp. 2015) applies. See Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 

477 S.W.3d 235, 249 (Tenn. 2015) (noting that in contrast to the action in Rye, which 

was initiated in 2009, Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101 “applies to actions filed on or after 

July 1, 2011.”) (citing Act of May 20, 2011, ch. 498, 2011 Tenn. Pub. Acts § 3 at 471). 

The statute provides:

In motions for summary judgment in any civil action in Tennessee, 

the moving party who does not bear the burden of proof at trial shall prevail 

on its motion for summary judgment if it:

(1) Submits affirmative evidence that negates an essential 

element of the nonmoving party’s claim; or

(2) Demonstrates to the court that the nonmoving party’s 

evidence is insufficient to establish an essential element of the 

nonmoving party’s claim.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101. See also Rye, 477 S.W.3d at 264 n.10 (stating that the 

Rye majority analyzed the summary judgment standard “independent of and unrelated to 

legislative action.”). 

_________________________________ 

THOMAS R. FRIERSON, II, JUDGE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 637 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                               H. R. 637   

 To authorize the President to veto an item of appropriation in an Act 
                             or resolution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1993

Mr. Sundquist introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the President to veto an item of appropriation in an Act 
                             or resolution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VETO AUTHORITY.

    The President may disapprove an item of appropriation in any Act or 
resolution.

SEC. 2. OBJECTION AND RECONSIDERATION.

    Whenever the President disapproves an item of appropriation 
pursuant to this Act, the President shall designate the disapproved 
item and return a copy of such item, with his objections, for 
reconsideration by the House of Congress in which the Act or resolution 
containing the item originated. If, after such reconsideration, a 
majority of that House agrees to pass the item, it shall be sent, 
together with the objections, to the other House for reconsideration; 
if approved by a majority of that House, the item shall become law.

                                 <all>
```
259 La. 686

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Frank SAVARESE.

No. 51641.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 17, 1971.

In re: Frank Savarese applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus with stay order.

Writ denied: Stay order of July 27, 1971 rescinded. The showing made is insufficient to justify the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27647-27648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12721]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10452]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Object Imported 
for Exhibition Determinations: Exhibition of the ``Wagner Garden 
Carpet''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that a certain object, entitled the ``Wagner Garden 
Carpet,'' to be exhibited in the Department of Islamic Art of The 
Metropolitan Museum of Art and at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, and 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at The Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about July 10, 2018, 
until on or about October 7, 2018, at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, 
in Houston, Texas, from on or about November 2, 2018, until on or about 
March 24, 2019, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to 
be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8efdebedfae7e1e0bcbabbb7cefdfaeffaeba0e9e1f8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f2819791869b9d9cc0c6c7cbb28186938697dc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me

[[Page 27648]]

by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 
12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring 
Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), 
Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of 
Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000.

Marie Therese Porter Royce,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2018-12721 Filed 6-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Donald D. PURVIS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 39923.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 29, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 236 So.2d 18.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with Aduddell Industries, Inc.'s (the “Company”) Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tim Aduddell, President of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                     |                                                                                                                             |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  November 19, 2007 | By:  /s/ Tim Aduddell              

Tim AduddellPresident |
No. 00-952.

#### Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services *v.*Blumer.

Ct. App. Wis. The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this ease expressing the views of the United States.
#### STATE ex rel. Melvin EDWARDS and Joseph Millet v. Charles C. FOTI, Criminal Sheriff, Orleans Parish.

No. 60891.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 11, 1977.

In re: Melvin Edwards and Joseph Millet applying for writ of mandamus.

Writ refused. Since relator has been returned to parish prison, the application is moot.
#### Willie Fred HOWARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1455.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 19, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Erma McPHERSON and Richard Lee Duncan, Appellants, v. James H. CALDWELL and Effie Joan Caldwell, his wife, Appellees.

No. 70-736.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 28, 1971.

Lake Lytal, Jr., of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto, Dean & Hallowes, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Theodore F. Zentner and Harry Lee An-stead, of Simpson & Anstead, West Palm Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669; Hendricks v. Dailey, Fla.1968, 208 So.2d 101; and Webster v. Harmon, Fla.App.1970, 240 So.2d 69.

CROSS, C. J., and REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                       JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
------------------                       -----------------------------

Actar Airforce, Inc.                              Canada

Breas Medical AB                                  Sweden

Marquest Medical Products, Inc.                   Colorado

Sleep Services of America, Inc.
(formerly, National Sleep
Technologies, Inc.)                               Maryland

Stelex-The Validation Group, Inc.
(formerly, The Validation Group, Inc.)            Pennsylvania

Thomas Medical Products, Inc.                     Pennsylvania

Vital Pharma, Inc.                                Florida

Vital Signs California, Inc.                      California

Vital Signs Limited                               United Kingdom

Vital Signs MN, Inc.                              Minnesota

Vital Signs Export, Inc.                          Barbados


                                       58
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with The Beard Company’s (the “Company”) Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Herb Mee, Jr., President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                  |                                                                                                                                                                 |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 19, 2009 | By:  /s/ Herb Mee, Jr.               

Herb Mee, Jr.President and Chief Financial Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000936448
<NAME> NUMBER NINE VISUAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                          13,895
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,872
<ALLOWANCES>                                       364
<INVENTORY>                                      9,422
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,676
<PP&E>                                           2,671
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,854
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,180
<SALES>                                        118,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,525
<CGS>                                          103,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  127,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 895
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,947)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (296)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,651)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.96)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6460]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7827]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Joan Mir[oacute]: the Ladder of Escape''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Joan Mir[oacute]: the Ladder of Escape,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the National 
Gallery of Art, Washington, DC from on or about May 6, 2012, until on 
or about August 12, 2012, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: March 12, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-6460 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


       
<S>                                 <C>
<ARTICLE>                                   UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from FPL's condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30,
1996 and condensed consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 1996 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

<CIK>                               0000037634
<NAME>           Florida Power & Light Company
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            9-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                          PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>           $9,300,760
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>           $745,055
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              $1,203,045
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    $0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                        $492,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     $11,741,356
<COMMON>                                    $0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   $0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         $0
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      $4,668,156
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  $42,000
<PREFERRED>                           $289,580
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                $2,980,701
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                          $0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                   $0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>              $0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>               $0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                   $0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                 $0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                            $0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>      $3,760,919
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      $11,741,356
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>           $4,556,678
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                  $281,058
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          $3,573,133
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          $3,854,191
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>               $702,487
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                      $2,200
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>        $704,687
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>              $186,150
<NET-INCOME>                          $518,537
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            $17,966
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>         $500,571
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    $0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                   $0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              $1,371,569
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               $0
<EPS-DILUTED>                               $0

        

</TABLE>
#### Gladys GOLDMAN and Milton F. Steinhardt, Petitioners, v. The FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION and A. D. Saker, Respondents.

No. 70-1229.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 3, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
----

            NOTICE TO READERS         

----
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 761

To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 to include

Montgomery and Roanoke Counties, Virginia, as part of the Appalachian

region.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1993

Mr. BOUCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of

1965 to include Montgomery and Roanoke Counties, Virginia, as part of the Appalachian region.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF MONTGOMERY AND ROANOKE

4 COUNTIES, VIRGINIA, AS PART OF APPALACH5 IAN REGION.

6 The 12th undesignated paragraph of section 403 of

7 the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 (40

8 U.S.C. App. 403) is amended—
2

•HR 761 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘Montgomery (including the

2 city of Radford),’’ after ‘‘Lee,’’; and

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘Roanoke,’’ after ‘‘Pulaski,’’.

Æ