UNITED STATES
	            SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
	                 WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549
                                 FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
	OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For The Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2007

	OR

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
	SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Commission File Number 1-7159


	            FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC.
	(exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

             Florida				           59-0573002
(State or other jurisdiction of			       (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)				Identification No.)


	155 East 21st Street, Jacksonville, Florida  32206
	(Address of principal executive offices)
	(Zip Code)

	904/355-1781
	(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.  Yes   X    No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer.   See
definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer   X
Accelerated filer            Non-accelerated filer

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes       No    X

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
classes of common stock, as of July 30, 2007: 66,690,854 shares of
$.10 par value common stock.




FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2007


CONTENTS

                                                                  Page No.

Part I.  Financial Information

Item 1.  Financial Statements (unaudited)
   Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets                               1
   Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income                         2
   Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows                     3
   Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements                4

Item 2.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial            15
	      Condition and Results of Operations

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk   25

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures                                      25


Part II.  Other Information


Item 1.  Legal Proceedings                                            25

Item 1A. Risk Factors                                                 26

Item 6.  Exhibits                                                     31

Signatures                                                            32

Exhibit 11   Computation of Earnings Per Common Share                 34

Exhibit 31(a)Certification of John D. Baker, II                       35

Exhibit 31(b)Certification of John D. Milton, Jr.                     36

Exhibit 31(c)Certification of Wallace A. Patzke, Jr.                  37

Exhibit 32   Certification under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act    38
		       of 2002



















Certain matters discussed in this report contain forward-looking statements
that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results
to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things,
capital expenditures, liquidity, capital resources, and competition and may
be indicated by words or phrases such as "anticipate," "estimate," "plans,"
"project," "continuing," "ongoing," "expects," "contemplates," "management
believes," "the Company believes," "the Company intends," and similar words
or phrases.   The following factors are among the principal factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking
statements: availability and terms of financing; the weather and other
natural phenomena; competition; levels of construction activity in the
Company's markets; cement shipments and availability; fuel and electric
costs; transportation costs; inflation; changes in interest rates; pricing;
increasing healthcare costs; quality and quantities of the Company's
aggregates reserves; residential and nonresidential construction; public
spending for federal highways and infrastructure; governmental regulations
and court constructions of same; resolution of Miami Lake Belt litigation;
ocean shipping rates; and management's ability to determine appropriate
sales mix, plant location and capacity utilization.  Further, in addition
to the factors relating to the merger with Vulcan Materials Company
discussed in Part II, Item I.A. under the caption "Risk Factors", the
following risks related to the businesses of Vulcan Materials Company,
Florida Rock and the combined company following the merger, among others,
could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the
forward-looking statements:

*	the possibility that the companies may be unable to obtain
shareholder or regulatory approvals required for the merger;
*	the possibility that problems may arise in successfully integrating
the businesses of the two companies;
*	the possibility that the merger may involve unexpected costs;
*	the possibility that the combined company may be unable to achieve
cost-cutting synergies;
*	the possibility that the businesses may suffer as a result of
uncertainty surrounding the merger;
*	the outcome of pending legal proceedings; and
*	other risks and uncertainties.
This list is not a complete statement of all potential risks or
uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date
hereof based on management's current expectations and the Company does not
undertake, and affirmatively disclaims, an obligation to update such
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise. Additional information regarding these and other risks factors
may be found in the Company's other filings made from time to time with the


Securities and Exchange Commission.



                             PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                        FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
	                      CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
	                                 (In thousands)
	                                   (Unaudited)

                                                June 30,      September 30,
                                                  2007            2006

ASSETS
Current assets:
 Cash and cash equivalents                     $   41,570           93,353
 Accounts receivable, less allowance
  for doubtful accounts of $2,790
  ($2,816 at September 30, 2006)                  155,368          150,088
 Inventories                                       55,722           53,015
 Deferred income taxes                              4,814            3,696
 Prepaid expenses and other                         6,169            5,039
  Total current assets                            263,643          305,191

Other assets                                       68,614           64,305
Goodwill                                          176,752          176,752
Property, plant and equipment, at cost:
 Depletable land                                  157,729          157,536
 Other land                                        84,770           81,839
 Plant and equipment                            1,074,921          966,363
 Construction in process                          139,681           81,976
                                                1,457,101        1,287,714
 Less accumulated depreciation,
  depletion and amortization                      626,919          597,702
  Net property, plant and equipment               830,182          690,012
                                               $1,339,191        1,236,260
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
 Accounts payable                              $   68,651           82,327
 Dividends payable                                 10,000                -
 Accrued payroll and benefits                      28,512           50,670
 Accrued insurance reserves, current portion        5,859            3,196
 Accrued liabilities, other                        16,664           11,794
 Long-term debt due within one year                 3,281            3,279
  Total current liabilities                       132,967          151,266

Long-term debt, excluding current installments     16,250           16,423
Deferred income taxes                              96,965           92,449
Accrued employee benefits                          22,603           22,329
Long-term accrued insurance reserves               18,375           19,423
Other accrued liabilities                          20,541           18,474
 Total liabilities                                307,701          320,364

Shareholders' equity:
 Preferred stock, no par value; 10,000,000
  shares authorized, none issued                        -                -
 Common stock, $.10 par value; 150,000,000
  shares authorized, 66,690,854 shares
  (65,809,776 shares at September 30, 2006)         6,669            6,581
 Capital in excess of par value                    66,404           46,171
 Retained earnings                                961,615          884,763
 Less cost of treasury stock;                           -          (18,421)
  (478,390 shares at September 30, 2006)
 Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of
   tax                                             (3,198)          (3,198)
  Total shareholders' equity                    1,031,490          915,896
                                               $1,339,191        1,236,260
See accompanying notes.



	                        FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
	                          CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
	                            (In thousands except per share amounts)
	                                            (Unaudited)

                                   Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended
                                        June 30,               June 30,
                                     2007       2006       2007        2006

Net sales                          $267,340    349,333    797,205   1,001,667
Freight revenues                      8,291     11,660     23,162      29,665
  Total sales                       275,631    360,993    820,367   1,031,332

Cost of sales                       182,627    227,820    551,702     666,645
Freight expense                       8,529     11,768     23,653      29,884
  Total cost of sales               191,156    239,588    575,355     696,529

Gross profit                         84,475    121,405    245,012     334,803
Selling, general and administrative  30,294     32,730     87,316      95,694
Gain on sales of real estate              -     (1,621)    (3,976)     (3,312)
Operating profit                     54,181     90,296    161,672     242,421

Interest expense                        (25)         -       (128)       (259)
Interest income                         282        685      2,341       2,013
Other income (expense), net             992        890      1,340       4,895

Income before income taxes           55,430     91,871    165,225     249,070
Provision for income taxes           19,376     33,554     58,682      90,928

Net income                         $ 36,054     58,317    106,543     158,142

Earnings per share:
 Basic                                $ .54        .89       1.62        2.41

 Diluted                              $ .54        .87       1.59        2.36

Cash dividend per common share        $ .15        .15        .45         .45

Weighted average shares used
in computing earnings per share:
 Basic                               66,366     65,778     65,753      65,671
 Diluted                             67,241     67,058     66,836      66,921


See accompanying notes.


                   FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
	           CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                       NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006
	                           (In thousands)
	                             (Unaudited)
                                                   2007       2006
Cash flows from operating activities:
  Net income                                     $106,543  158,142
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
   cash provided from operating activities:
    Depreciation, depletion and amortization       59,575   54,613
    Deferred income tax provision (benefit)         3,398   (3,187)
    Provision for doubtful accounts                   429      552
    Gain on disposition of property, plant and
      equipment and other assets                   (6,819)  (8,017)
    Dividends from affiliates                         994      291
    Stock option expense                            3,834    3,955
  Net changes in operating assets and
     liabilities:
     Accounts receivable                           (5,709) (17,121)
     Inventories                                   (2,707)  (4,331)
     Prepaid expenses and other                    (1,139)  (2,752)
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities     (25,872)   9,203
     Other, net                                       479      (42)

 Net cash provided by operating activities        133,006  191,306

Cash flows from investing activities:
  Purchases of property, plant and equipment     (199,225)(106,568)
  Net proceeds from the sale of property, plant
   and equipment and other assets                  11,203    6,369
  Additions to other assets                        (7,466) (12,464)
  Investment in and advances to joint ventures     (1,670)       -
  Business acquisition                                  -  (44,373)
  Collection of advances to affiliates                  -      313

Net cash used in investing activities            (197,158)(156,723)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Repayment of long-term debt                        (171)    (181)
  Exercise of employee stock options               15,671    3,587
  Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock
   options                                         31,972    3,648
  Tax payment on net stock option exercise        (15,412)       -
  Payment of dividends                            (19,691) (29,531)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing           12,369  (22,477)
  activities

Net(decrease)increase in cash and cash equivalents(51,783)  12,106

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period   93,353   68,921

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period      $  41,570   81,027


See accompanying notes.

                     FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
	         NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                	(Unaudited)

(1)	Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of Florida Rock Industries, Inc. and
its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company").
These statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America for interim financial information and the
instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all the
information and footnotes required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America for
complete financial statements.  In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of
the results for the interim periods have been included.
Operating results for the three and nine months ended June
30, 2007, are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2007.  The accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements and the information included under the heading
"Management's Discussion and Analysis" should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
related notes of Florida Rock Industries, Inc. included in
its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September
30, 2006.

(2)	Merger with Vulcan Materials Company

On February 19, 2007, the Company entered into a definitive
Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended by Amendment No. 1
to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 9,
2007 (the "merger agreement"), with Vulcan Materials Company
("Vulcan") and certain other parties described below.  The
merger agreement provides that two newly formed subsidiaries
of a new holding company will merge with the Company and
Vulcan, respectively.  As a result of these mergers, the
Company and Vulcan each will become wholly owned
subsidiaries of the new holding company ("Virginia Holdco,
Inc." or "Holdco"), which will then be renamed Vulcan
Materials Company.  The Vulcan stock owned by Vulcan
shareholders will be converted into shares of Holdco.  The
Company's shareholders will have the option to elect to
receive $67.00 per share in cash for each Company share
held, or 0.63 of a share of common stock of Holdco, subject
to proration as described in the following paragraph.

The merger agreement provides that, in the aggregate, 70% of
Florida Rock common stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the completion of the merger will be converted into
the right to receive cash consideration and the remaining
30% will be converted into the right to receive stock
consideration.

The transaction is subject to the approval of a majority of
the Company's shareholders, regulatory approvals, and other
customary closing conditions. In connection with the merger,
certain members and affiliates of the Baker family have
entered into a support agreement requiring them to vote
certain of their shares of Florida Rock common stock in
favor of the Florida Rock merger.

Under the terms of the merger agreement, the Company may be
required to pay Vulcan a termination fee in the amount of
$135 million in cash in the following circumstances:

*	The merger agreement is terminated by Vulcan because
the Company's board of directors withdraws, modifies
or resolves to withdraw or modify its recommendation
to the Company's shareholders to approve the merger
agreement;
*	The merger agreement is terminated by Vulcan because
the Company fails to call the special meeting of
shareholders to approve the merger agreement or fails
to prepare and mail to shareholders the proxy
statement/prospectus soliciting votes to approve the
merger agreement;
*	The merger agreement is (1) terminated (a) by Vulcan
because the Company breaches the exclusivity
provisions of the merger agreement or (b) by either
the Company or Vulcan because the Company's
shareholders fail to approve the merger agreement and,
(2) prior to the shareholders meeting, a third party
publicly announces a competing acquisition proposal
for the Company and (3) within 12 months of the
termination of the merger agreement, the Company
enters into an agreement with respect to, or
completes, the acquisition proposal;
*	The merger agreement is (1) terminated (a) by either
the Company or Vulcan because the merger has not been
completed before November 19, 2007 or (b) by Vulcan
because of breach of certain representations or
warranties in the merger agreement made by Florida
Rock and, (2) prior to the termination of the merger
agreement, a third party publicly announces a
competing acquisition proposal for the Company and (3)
within 12 months of the termination of the merger
agreement, the Company enters into an agreement with
respect to, or completes, the acquisition proposal.

The transaction is expected to close sometime in the
Company's fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.  We have incurred
$4,422,000 and $7,422,000 in costs included in selling,
general and administrative expenses for the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2007 related to legal, accounting and
investment banking services in connection with the merger.

In connection with the merger and pursuant to the merger
agreement, the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, as successor rights agent, entered into an
amendment ("Amendment No. 1") to the Rights Agreement, dated
as of May 5, 1999, by and between the Company and First
Union National Bank (the "Rights Agreement"), which provides
that neither the execution of the merger agreement nor the
completion of the merger will trigger the provisions of the
Rights Agreement.

The foregoing description of the merger agreement, support
agreement, shareholders agreement and Amendment No. 1 to the
Rights Agreement are qualified in their entirety by
reference to the full text of such agreements, copies of
which have been previously filed on Form 8-K dated February
21, 2007 and listed as Exhibits 4 and 99a-c hereto,
respectively and are incorporated herein by reference.

(3)	Stock Option Plan

	The Company uses the Black Scholes option-pricing model to
determine fair value of stock options. The fair value of
options granted during the three and nine months of fiscal
2007 and 2006 was estimated using the following weighted
average assumptions:

	                          Three Months        Nine Months
                                    Ended               Ended
                               _   June 30           _ June 30 __
	                       2007     2006       2007     2006

     Expected dividend yield    -       .94%       1.39%    1.15%
     Expected volatility        -     34.62%      35.91%   34.26%
     Risk-free interest rate    -      5.15%       4.44%    4.49%
     Expected life of stock
       options-years            -    9 years    7.1 years  7.2 years

     Expected volatility is based on the Company's historical stock
prices.

     The following table summarizes stock option activity for the nine
months ended June 30, 2007:

                                         Weighted    Weighted
                                          Average     Average     Aggregate
                                          Exercise    Remaining   Intrinsic
                               Options     Price       Life       Value

     Outstanding on
        September 30, 2006   3,630,626    $20.45

      Granted                  305,194     43.21
      Exercised             (1,636,397)    11.58
      Canceled                 (26,950)    36.04

      Outstanding on
        June 30, 2007        2,272,473     29.71      6.6     $85,885,000
      Exercisable on
        June 30, 2007        1,309,735    $22.57      5.5     $58,850,000


The weighted average grant-date fair value for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 was $29.80. For the nine months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, the weighted average grant
date fair values were $17.04 and $21.15, respectively.   The
total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $58,793,000 and
$2,684,000, respectively.

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the
nine months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $89,826,000 and
$10,854,000, respectively.  The total tax benefits for the
nine months ended June 30, 2007 were $34,648,000 of which
$31,971,000 were excess tax benefits and reported as cash
flows from financing activities.

For the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
compensation cost related to stock-based awards was
$1,141,000 and $1,315,000, respectively. Tax benefits
recognized related to stock-based compensation for the three
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were $440,000 and
$507,000, respectively.

For the nine months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
compensation cost related to stock-based awards was
$3,834,000 and $3,955,000, respectively. Tax benefits
recognized related to stock-based compensation for the nine
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were $1,479,000 and
$1,526,000, respectively.

As of June 30, 2007, there is $11,176,000 of unrecognized
compensation expense related to nonvested option awards that
is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period
of 3.0 years. Under the merger agreement, the Company is
required to cause each nonvested option award to become
vested and fully exercisable at least ten business days
prior to the deadline for shareholders to elect to receive
cash or Holdco stock at which time any unrecognized
compensation costs will be recorded.  The merger agreement
defines the election deadline as the date of the Florida
Rock shareholders meeting, or if the closing date of the
merger is more than four business days following the Florida
Rock shareholders meeting, two business days preceding the
merger closing date, or such other date on which the parties
mutually agree.

(4)	New Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a
consensus on Issue 04-6, "Accounting for Stripping Costs
Incurred during Production in the Mining Industry" ("EITF
04-6"). EITF 04-6 was effective for the Company beginning
October 1, 2006 and requires that stripping costs incurred
during the production phase of the mine be included in the
costs of the inventory produced during the period that the
stripping costs are incurred.   The Company previously
accounted for stripping costs consistent with the method
prescribed by EITF 04-6, and as such, the adoption of EITF
04-6 did not affect the Company's consolidated financial
statements.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, "Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes," which
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes.
FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods and disclosure. The provisions
of FIN 48 are effective for the Company beginning October 1,
2007 and they are not expected to have a material effect on
the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In June 2006, the FASB ratified EITF No. 06-3, "Disclosure
Requirements for Taxes Assessed by a Government Authority on
Revenue-Producing Transactions." EITF 06-3 requires
disclosure of a company's accounting policy with respect to
presentation of taxes collected on a revenue producing
transaction between a seller and a customer. For taxes that
are reported on a gross basis (included in revenue and
costs), EITF 06-3 also requires disclosure of the amount of
taxes included in the financial statements.  EITF 06-3 was
effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2007 and did
not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated
financial statements. The Company records taxes collected on
revenue producing activities on a net basis.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
No. AUG AIR-1, "Accounting for Planned Major Maintenance
Activities," which prohibits the use of the accrue-in-
advance method of accounting for planned major maintenance
activities. FSP AUG AIR-1 is effective for the Company
beginning October 1, 2007. The Company does not currently
use the prohibited method, thus the FSP is not expected to
have a material impact on the Company's consolidated
financial statements.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission
issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, "Considering the
Effects of Prior Year Misstatements in Current Year
Financial Statements," which requires registrants to
consider the effect of all carryover and reversing effects
or prior year misstatements when quantifying errors in
current year financial statements. The cumulative effect of
initial application is to be reported in the carrying amount
of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the fiscal
year, and the offsetting is to be made to the opening
balance of retained earnings for that year. The provisions
of SAB 108 are effective for the Company's fiscal year
ending September 30, 2007. The Company is in the process of
evaluating the requirements of SAB 108 and has not yet
determined the impact, if any, on its consolidated financial
statements.

In September 2006, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 06-5,
"Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance-Determining the
Amount That Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB
Technical Bulletin No. 85-4." This issue requires that the
determination of the amount that could be realized under an
insurance contract (1) consider any additional amounts
(beyond cash surrender value) included in the contractual
terms of the policy and (2) be based on assumed surrender at
the individual policy or certificate level, unless all
policies or certificates are required to be surrendered as a
group.  When it is probable that contractual restrictions
would limit the amount that could be realized, such
contractual limitations should be considered and any amounts
recoverable at the insurance company's discretion should be
excluded from the amount that could be realized. EITF 06-5
is effective for the Company beginning October 1, 2007 and
the Company is evaluating the impact, if any, of this EITF
on the consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value
Measurements," which defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for the Company
beginning October 1, 2008 and the Company is evaluating the
impact, if any, of this Statement on its consolidated
financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, "Employers'
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
88, 106, and 132(R)." This Statement requires the Company to
recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of its
defined benefit postretirement plans as an asset or
liability in its balance sheet and to recognize changes in
that funded status in the year in which the changes occur
through comprehensive income. This Statement also requires
the measurement of defined benefit plan assets and
obligations as of the date of the Company's fiscal year end.
SFAS 158 is effective for the Company as of September 30,
2007, with the exception of the measurement date provisions,
which are effective for the Company's fiscal year ending
September 30, 2009. While the Company is still evaluating
the impact of FAS 158, it expects to record an adjustment to
other comprehensive income for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2007 for its unfunded pension liability as a
result of the adoption of this Statement.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115." This
Statement permits all entities to choose, at specified
election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value (the
"fair value option"). SFAS 159 is effective for the Company
beginning October 1, 2009 and the Company is evaluating the
impact of this Statement on its consolidated financial
statements.

(5)	Asset Retirement Obligations

Asset retirement obligations are recorded for legal
obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived
assets that result from the acquisition, construction,
development and (or) normal use of the asset.

The analysis of asset retirement obligations for the nine
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 is as follows (in
thousands):
                                           2007     2006

      Balance at beginning of period      $13,511   $9,060
      Additional liabilities                  689    2,572
      Cash flow revisions                     949        -
      Accretion of expenses                   553      350
      Payments/settlement of obligations   (1,144)    (312)
      Balance at end of period            $14,558   11,670

For the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, expense
related to the asset retirement obligation was $298,000 and
$119,000, respectively.  Expense related to the asset
retirement obligation for the nine months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006 was $728,000 and $350,000, respectively.

(6)	Inventories

       Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

   	                             June 30,     September 30,
                                      2007             2006

      Finished products            $ 33,080           29,312
      Raw materials                  11,492            9,232
      Work in progress                1,499            2,382
      Parts and supplies              9,651           12,089
                                   $ 55,722           53,015

The excess of current cost over the LIFO stated values of
inventories was $12,407,000 at June 30, 2007 and $12,018,000
at September 30, 2006.

During the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2007,
inventory costs increased, as quantities decreased. As a
result, the change in the LIFO reserve decreased cost of
sales by $82,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007
and increased cost of sales by $389,000 for the nine months
ended June 30, 2007.   During the third quarter of fiscal
2006, inventory quantities decreased slightly, while unit
costs increased, resulting in a change in the LIFO reserve
that decreased cost of sales by $455,000 for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 and $327,000 for the nine months
ended June 30, 2006.

(7) Property, Plant and Equipment - Depletable Land

  	Depletion of sand and stone deposits is determined on the
basis of units of production in relation to estimated proven
reserves.   Proven reserves are estimated by our geologists
based upon results of sampling and other scientific methods
and techniques.   Depletion was $312,000 and $319,000 for
the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.  For the nine
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 depletion was $780,000
and $933,000.  Units of production were 3,740,000 and
3,850,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
and 9,762,000 and 11,101,365 for the nine months ended June
30, 2007 and 2006.

(8) Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate is based on expected income,
statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available
in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. On an
interim basis, we estimate the annual tax rate based on
projected taxable income for the full year and record a
quarterly income tax provision in accordance with the
anticipated annual rate. As the year progresses, we refine
the estimates of the year's taxable income as new
information becomes available, including year-to-date
financial results. This continual estimation process often
results in a change to our expected effective tax rate for
the year. When this occurs, we adjust the income tax
provision during the quarter in which the change in estimate
occurs so that the year-to-date provision reflects the
expected annual tax rate.

Income taxes receivable were $37,740,000 at June 30, 2007
and $7,361,000 at September 30, 2006 and are included in
accounts receivable in the condensed consolidated balance
sheets.

(9)  Gains on Sale of Real Estate and Other Income

During the first nine months of fiscal 2007, the Company
sold real estate resulting in pre-tax gains of $3,976,000.
The Company sold real estate resulting in pre-tax gains of
$1,621,000 and $3,312,000 for the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2006, respectively. Additionally during the
nine months of fiscal 2006, the Company exchanged parcels of
land with another party in settlement of a lawsuit,
resulting in a pre-tax gain of $2,838,000 which was recorded
in other income.

(10)	Business Segments

The Company has identified three business segments, each of
which is managed separately along product lines.   The
Company's operations are in the Southeastern and Mid-
Atlantic States.  The Aggregates segment mines, processes
and sells construction aggregates.   The Concrete Products
segment produces and sells ready-mix concrete and other
concrete products.   The Cement and Calcium segment produces
and sells cement and calcium products to customers in
Florida and Georgia.

Operating results and certain other financial data for the
Company's business segments are as follows (in thousands):

                               Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
                                   June 30,             June 30,
                               2007       2006     2007      2006

Net sales, excluding
  freight
   Construction aggregates  $ 96,320    98,835  269,780   282,266
   Concrete products         164,547   231,296  501,140   660,613
   Cement and calcium         41,328    61,200  131,457   180,522
   Intersegment sales        (34,855)  (41,998)(105,172) (121,734)

   Total net sales,
     excluding freight      $267,340   349,333   797,205 1,001,667

Operating profit,
   Construction aggregates  $ 29,247    31,704    72,309    81,756
   Concrete products          19,649    42,953    60,230   119,606
   Cement and calcium         13,347    23,787    45,016    64,145
   Corporate overhead         (8,062)   (8,148)  (15,883)  (23,086)
   Total operating
     Profit                 $ 54,181    90,296   161,672   242,421


      Identifiable assets, at quarter end
   Construction aggregates                       546,763   452,119
   Concrete products                             324,351   347,770
   Cement and calcium                            305,080   234,300
   Unallocated corporate
     assets                                      103,874    77,118
   Cash items                                     41,570    81,027
   Investments in affiliates                      17,553    11,952

   Total identifiable
     Assets                                    1,339,191  1,204,286

Construction aggregates operating profit for the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2006 includes gains on the sale
of real estate of $86,000 and $1,427,000.

Concrete products operating profit for the nine months ended
June 30, 2007 includes gains on the sale of real estate of
$4,000.  Concrete products operating profit for the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2006 includes gains on the
sale of real estate of $1,535,000 and $1,885,000.

Cement and calcium operating profit for the nine months
ended June 30, 2007 includes gains on the sale of real
estate of $3,972,000.   Cement operating profit for the
three and nine months of fiscal 2006 includes $1,075,000 of
insurance proceeds.

	Corporate overhead includes the costs of certain operating
activities that are not reflected in the operating results
used internally to measure and evaluate our core businesses.
These costs include executive management and related
personnel costs, corporate development costs, public company
expenses, certain employee benefits, professional and
service fees, certain insurance costs, and other general
corporate items.

(11)	Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information

Cash paid during the nine months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006 for certain expense items are as follows (in
thousands):

                                              2007       2006
      Interest expense, net of amount
       capitalized of $750 and $617        $    118         0
      Income taxes                         $ 51,487    97,657

The following schedule summarizes non-cash investing and
financing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006 (in thousands):







                                              2007       2006

       Additions to property, plant
        and equipment from exchanges         $1,843      3,757

       Exercise of stock options satisfied
        by the surrender of shares           $3,253        -


(12)	Related Party Transaction

On October 4, 2006, the Company entered into a 50-50 joint
venture with a subsidiary of Patriot Transportation Holding,
Inc. ("FRP") to develop property near Brooksville, Florida.
We contributed approximately 553 acres of land with a book
value of $1,700,000 and FRP contributed approximately 3,433
acres of land which the Company leased from Patriot under a
long-term mining lease.   In addition, we contributed an
additional 288 acre parcel that we acquired in 2006, and FRP
reimbursed us $3,018,000 for one-half of the acquisition
costs of that parcel. The Company's investment in the joint
venture is $5,042,000 as of June 30, 2007. The Company and
FRP are each required to fund up to $2 million each in
additional capital contributions.   The Company will
continue to conduct mining operations on a portion of the
property and pay royalties to FRP based on actual tons
mined.

(13)	Contingent Liabilities

Following is a discussion of the more significant
matters. In view of the inherent uncertainties, the
outcome of any unresolved matters described below cannot
be predicted at this time, nor can the amount of
potential loss, if any, be reasonably estimated.

On March 22, 2006, the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Florida ruled that the mining
permit issued for our Miami quarry, as well as several
permits issued to competitors in the same region, had
been improperly issued. The Court remanded the permitting
process to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for further
review and consideration.

On July 13, 2007, the Court ruled that the Company must
cease all mining excavation at the Miami quarry,
effective on July 17, 2007, pending the issuance by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers of a Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement.

The Court based its decision to shut down mining activity
of the Miami quarry and two quarries owned by competitors
on concern that levels of benzene had been detected in an
area of the Biscayne Aquifer known as the Northwest
Wellfield, which supplies a significant portion of the
water supply to the Miami area.  At this time, the
Company does not know whether the benzene was produced by
the Company's mining activities, but the Company does not
believe that the levels of benzene pose a risk to human
health.

For the nine months ended June 30, 2007, we sold
2,467,000 tons of aggregates from the Miami quarry,
generating $28,673,000 in revenues. A significant portion
of this volume is shipped by rail to Central and
Northeast Florida and used in our concrete production
facilities in Southeastern Florida, Central Florida and
Jacksonville.  Our Miami quarry employs 68 persons and
has property, plant and equipment of approximately
$78,967,000 of which $23,544,000 is land.

We estimate that recoverable reserves at the Miami quarry
(assuming that mining is permitted to continue in the
long term) are approximately 135 million tons.

The Company has performed an impairment analysis in
accordance with SFAS No. 144,"Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," and has
determined that the assets are not impaired at this time.
In the event the Corp of Engineers does not re-issue a
permit to resume mining, the Company plans to transfer
all movable assets to other locations. The recoverability
of the remaining assets, consisting of land and
infrastructure, would depend on the value of the land for
alternative uses. Depending on potential usage of the
land this could result in an impairment charge of zero to
$35 million.

At present, the Company is utilizing stockpiled materials
from the Miami quarry while working to implement
contingency plans to provide an alternative source of
aggregates for use in the Company's concrete operations
in the southeastern, north central and northeastern
portions of Florida.  Depending on market conditions, the
Company currently plans to source aggregates for these
operations by (i) purchasing aggregates from competitors
(which would reduce the revenues of the Company's Florida
aggregates operations) or (ii) transporting aggregates
from the Company's Ft. Myers quarry.  In either event,
this development will lead to increased costs to the
Company's Florida concrete operations, and the Company is
uncertain as to whether the Company will be able to pass
along these costs to customers.

The Company and the members of its board of directors
were named in a purported shareholder class action
complaint filed in Florida state court (the Duval County
Circuit Court) on March 6, 2007, captioned Dillinger v.
Florida Rock, et al., Case No. 16-20007-CA-001906.  The
complaint seeks to enjoin the merger and alleges, among
other things, that the directors have breached their
fiduciary duties owed to the Company's shareholders by
attempting to sell the Company to Vulcan for an
inadequate price.

Under the terms of the merger agreement, the Company may
be required to pay Vulcan a termination fee in the amount
of $135 million in cash under certain circumstances.
Please refer to Note (2) for further discussion of the
termination fee.

We are involved in litigation on a number of other
matters and are subject to certain claims which arise in
the normal course of business, none of which, in the
opinion of management, are expected to have a materially
adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

We have retained certain self-insurance risks with
respect to losses for third party liability and property
damage.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
          CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

       Merger with Vulcan Materials Company.  On February 19, 2007,
the Company entered into a definitive   Agreement and Plan of
Merger, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan
of Merger dated as of April 9, 2007, with Vulcan Materials
Company and certain other parties described below.  The merger
agreement provides that two newly formed subsidiaries of a new
holding company will merge with the Company and Vulcan,
respectively.  As a result of these mergers, the Company and
Vulcan each will become wholly owned subsidiaries of the new
holding company ("Virginia Holdco, Inc." or "Holdco"), which will
then be renamed Vulcan Materials Company.  The Vulcan stock owned
by Vulcan shareholders will be converted into shares of Holdco.
The Company's shareholders will have the option to elect to
receive $67.00 per share in cash for each Company share held, or
0.63 of a share of common stock of Holdco, subject to proration
as described in the following paragraph.

       The merger agreement provides that, in the aggregate, 70% of
Florida Rock common stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the completion of the merger will be converted into the
right to receive cash consideration and the remaining 30% will be
converted into the right to receive stock consideration.

       The transaction is subject to the approval of a majority of
the Company's shareholders, regulatory approvals, and other
customary closing conditions. In connection with the merger,
certain members and affiliates of the Baker family have entered
into a support agreement requiring them to vote certain of their
shares of Florida Rock common stock in favor of the Florida Rock
merger.

       Under the terms of the merger agreement, the Company may be
required to pay Vulcan a termination fee in the amount of $135
million in cash in the following circumstances:

*	The merger agreement is terminated by Vulcan because
the Company's board of directors withdraws, modifies
or resolves to withdraw or modify its recommendation
to the Company's shareholders to approve the merger
agreement;
*	The merger agreement is terminated by Vulcan because
the Company fails to call the special meeting of
shareholders to approve the merger agreement or fails
to prepare and mail to shareholders the proxy
statement/prospectus soliciting votes to approve the
merger agreement;
*	The merger agreement is (1) terminated (a) by Vulcan
because the Company breaches the exclusivity
provisions of the merger agreement or (b) by either
the Company or Vulcan because the Company's
shareholders fail to approve the merger agreement and,
(2) prior to the shareholders meeting, a third party
publicly announces a competing acquisition proposal
for the Company and (3) within 12 months of the
termination of the merger agreement, the Company
enters into an agreement with respect to, or
completes, the acquisition proposal;
*	The merger agreement is (1) terminated (a) by either
the Company or Vulcan because the merger has not been
completed before November 19, 2007 or (b) by Vulcan
because of breach of certain representations or
warranties in the merger agreement made by Florida
Rock and, (2) prior to the termination of the merger
agreement, a third party publicly announces a
competing acquisition proposal for the Company and (3)
within 12 months of the termination of the merger
agreement, the Company enters into an agreement with
respect to, or completes, the acquisition proposal.

       The transaction is expected to close sometime in the
Company's fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.   We have incurred
$4,422,000 and $7,422,000 in costs included in selling, general
and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2007 related to legal, accounting and investment banking
services in connection with the merger.

       In connection with the merger and pursuant to the merger
agreement, the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, as successor rights agent, entered into an amendment
("Amendment No. 1") to the Rights Agreement, dated as of May 5,
1999, by and between the Company and First Union National Bank,
which provides that neither the execution of the merger agreement
nor the completion of the merger will trigger the provisions of
the Rights Agreement.

       The foregoing description of the merger agreement, support
agreement, shareholders agreement and Amendment No. 1 to the
Rights Agreement are qualified in their entirety by reference to
the full text of such agreements, copies of which have been
previously filed on Form 8-K dated February 21, 2007 and listed
as Exhibits 4 and 99a-c hereto, respectively and are incorporated
herein by reference.

       On April 11, 2007, the Company received a request for
additional information and documentary material (referred to as a
"Second Request") from the United States Department of Justice
(the "DOJ"), pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust
Improvements Act, in connection with its contemplated acquisition
by Vulcan.  The Company is cooperating fully with the DOJ.

       The Special Meeting of the Shareholders will be held on
August 14, 2007 to vote on approval of the merger transaction
subject to other conditions of closing.

	Executive Overview. The Company is one of the nation's
leading producers of construction aggregates, a major provider of
ready-mix concrete and concrete products in the Southeastern and
Mid-Atlantic States and a significant supplier of cement in
Florida and Georgia. We operate through three business segments:
construction aggregates, concrete products and cement and calcium.
The construction aggregates segment is engaged in the mining,
processing, distribution and sale of sand, gravel and crushed
stone.   The concrete products segment is engaged in production
and sale of ready-mix concrete, concrete block, prestressed
concrete as well as sales of other building materials.   The
cement and calcium products segment is engaged in the production
and sale of Portland and masonry cement, the importation of cement
and slag which are either sold or ground or blended and then sold
and the sale of calcium products to the animal feed industry.

     This discussion should be read in conjunction with
management's analysis included in the Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006.

     For the contribution made to net sales and operating profit
from each business segment, see Note 10 to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our Business

     We are a major basic construction materials company
concentrating on growth markets in the Southeastern and Mid-
Atlantic States.   We operate in three business segments:
construction aggregates, cement and calcium products, and concrete
products.

     Construction Aggregates.   Our construction aggregates
segment is engaged in the mining, processing, distribution and
sale of crushed stone, sand and gravel.   We operate in Florida,
Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, Maryland, Virginia, Delaware,
Illinois, Kentucky, Washington D.C. and Canada.

     Concrete Products Segment.   Our concrete products segment
produces and sells ready-mix concrete, concrete block, prestressed
and precast concrete and sells other building materials in
Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland and
Washington D.C.

     Cement and Calcium Products.   Our cement and calcium
products segment operates a cement plant in Newberry, Florida,
import terminals and grinding facilities in Tampa and Port
Manatee, Florida and a limestone grinding facility in Brooksville,
Florida.

     We expect to complete construction of a second cement line in
early fiscal 2009 that will double the existing production
capacity.

     Our Tampa facility imports, blends or bags and sells cement
and grinds, blends and sells granulated blast furnace slag.   Our
Port Manatee facility imports and grinds clinker (unground cement)
and sells the ground cement.

     Our Brooksville facility operates a limestone grinding plant
that provides product for the animal feed industry and paint,
plastic and joint compound industries.

Business Environment

     Our business principally serves customers in the construction
industry.   Our business is impacted by a number of factors
affecting the construction industry and the economy as a whole.
Although a number of different factors, risks and trends affect
our business, we have highlighted some of these factors below:

     Our Markets.   Construction activity and general economic
conditions in our principal markets significantly affect our
results.  We continue to focus our operations and expansion on
growth markets.

     Construction Activity.    In recent months residential
construction has declined dramatically in our Florida markets.
During the third quarter, total volumes of ready-mix concrete
declined 25.8% as compared to the third quarter of last year.
Ready-mix volumes for the third quarter increased 13.7% as
compared to the second quarter primarily due to the seasonality of
our northern operations.  Concrete block volumes were down 12.1%
as compared to the second quarter of this year and 52.9% compared
to the third quarter of last year.  We cannot estimate when the
housing market will turn around and until residential construction
recovers, volumes will continue to trail last year's volumes.
These markets had enjoyed strong levels of residential
construction activity in recent years. Residential construction
activity has been fueled by many factors, including migration into
Florida and mortgage rates near historic lows. We expect this
growth trend to continue in Florida over the long term due to
projected population growth although it is more difficult to
predict commercial construction activity and residential
construction activity in other states.   Construction activity in
our markets is affected by a number of factors, including
population growth, economic conditions, interest rates and other
factors.

     Cement Supplies.   Demand for cement products was strong
during fiscal 2005 but weakened in late fiscal 2006 as a result of
the slowdown in residential construction.   Demand continued to be
extremely weak in fiscal 2007.    As a result there is an excess
supply of cement in our southern markets.   Our cement plant at
Newberry was shut down thirty-nine days during the months of
January and March due to lack of storage for our inventory.
Nevertheless, we expect long-term demand to be strong in our
principal markets.

	Additional Factors Influencing Operations.  Our operations
are influenced by a number of other external and internal factors.
Other external factors include weather, competition, interest
rates, fuel costs, transportation costs, driver availability,
labor costs and inflation.   Other internal factors include sales
mix, plant location, quality and quantities of aggregates
reserves, capacity utilization and other operating factors.


	 In October 2005, a hurricane affected southern Florida and
caused a disruption of business during the first quarter of fiscal
2006.   After the storm, the focus in that area was on restoring
conditions rather than commencing new construction.   Rail
operations were interrupted, resulting in restricted delivery of
product to our terminals.   This interruption caused a shortage of
aggregate productions in some parts of Florida which affected
business in areas not affected by the hurricane.  This resulted in
a negative impact on sales volumes in our southern operations
during the first quarter of fiscal 2006.

	Financial results are affected by planned maintenance at the
cement plant since these costs, which can be significant, are
expensed when incurred. The Company expensed planned maintenance
of $1,100,000 in the third quarter and $3,700,000 in the first
nine months of fiscal 2007 as compared to $1,600,000 in the third
quarter and $4,100,000 in the first nine months of fiscal 2006.
The plant was shut down for twenty-three days in fiscal 2007 and
nineteen days in fiscal 2006 for planned maintenance.  Planned
maintenance costs typically result in an overhaul to the wear
parts of the major operating components. Since the cement
manufacturing process is continuous, the coordination of the
repair to multiple components is paramount. Items that would
typically be inspected, repaired and/or replaced during an outage
would include: chain and belt conveyors, idlers, rollers, mill
journals, impact hammers, grinding table liners, separator blades,
mill liners, bearings, fans, ductwork, airslides, grinding media,
refractory, castable and shell replacement.

     Our capital expenditure program for fiscal 2007 has a budget
of $300 million.  This compares to capital expenditures in 2006 of
$159 million. The increase in the capital expenditure program for
2007 relates to adding a second line at our cement plant in
Newberry, Florida and building new aggregates and concrete plants.

     Our insurance program consists of the Company self-insuring a
portion of the claims and paying premiums for coverage in excess
of this self-insurance retention.   The self-insurance retention
level is determined by comparing the premium for the coverage
versus the potential exposure. For the automobile insurance
programs, self-insurance retention is $3,000,000 per occurrence.
For workers compensation and general liability insurance program,
the self-insurance retention is $1,000,000 per occurrence with an
aggregate of $2,000,000 for general liability.

	Operating Results.     For the third quarter of fiscal 2007,
which ended June 30, 2007, consolidated sales decreased 23.6% to
$275,631,000 from $360,933,000 in the same quarter last year.  The
primary reason for the decline in revenues is volume decreases in
all three of our business segments and lower sales prices for
cement.   The decrease in volumes was due to the slow down in the
construction markets with the most notable being the residential
markets.    These decreases were partially offset by higher
average selling prices in our aggregate segment and the higher
average selling price of ready-mix concrete.

In our aggregates segment, revenues decreased as a result of
volume declines of 20.9% at our producing locations and 12.3% at
our distribution terminals.   Partially offsetting these volume
declines, sales prices at both our producing and brokerage
locations increased approximately 18.1% over the same quarter last
year.

In our concrete products segment, revenues declined primarily as a
result of a 25.8% decrease in ready-mix volumes, a 52.9% decrease
in block volumes and a 4.7% decrease in the sales price of
concrete block.   These decreases were partially offset by an
increase in the average selling price of ready-mix concrete of
3.6%.

Our cement and calcium segment revenues also declined as a result
of a 27.5% decrease in cement volumes and a 4.2% decrease in the
average selling price of cement.

For the first nine months of fiscal 2007, consolidated sales
decreased 20.5% to $820,367,000 from $1,031,332,000 for the same
period last year.   The decrease in sales was due to decreased
revenues in all three segments due to lower volumes, partially
offset by higher average selling prices.

Revenues in the concrete products segments decreased due to
decreased volumes of concrete block of 45.2% and ready-mix
concrete of 24.6%.   These decreases were partially offset by
higher average selling price of ready-mix concrete of 7.4% and
concrete block of 1.0%.

Revenues in the aggregates segment decreased as a result of a
18.5% decrease in volumes partially offset by a 17.4% increase in
the average selling price.   The volume decreases were experienced
in both our southern and northern operations.

Revenues decreased in the cement and calcium segment from lower
cement volumes (27.3%) partially offset by a higher average
selling price of cement (1.6%).

Gross profit for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased 30.4%
to $84,475,000 from $121,405,000 for the same period last year.
Gross profit margin for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased
to 30.6% from 33.6% for the same period last year.  Gross profit
and margins decreased in all three segments.  Our business is
capital intensive resulting in significant fixed costs.   When we
experience these levels of decreases in volumes, it will cause a
significant decrease in our gross profit margin and gross profit.
The construction aggregates segment declines were primarily a
result of reduced volumes, higher depreciation expense and high
fixed costs.  The cement and calcium declines were primarily a
result of reduced volumes and the high fixed costs.  The concrete
products decline resulted from reduced volumes and the high fixed
costs. On a consolidated basis, an increase in depreciation and
amortization of $2,512,000 adversely affected gross profit.

Gross profit for the first nine months of fiscal 2007 decreased
26.8% to $245,012,000 from $334,803,000 for the same quarter last
year.   Gross margin for the first nine months of fiscal 2007
decreased to 29.9% from 32.5% for the same period last year.
Gross profit and margin declined in all three segments.   The
decline in the cement and calcium segment is due to lower volumes
and high fixed costs.  These declines were partially offset by
higher average selling prices.   The decline in gross profit in
the concrete products segment was due to lower volume and high
fixed costs, partially offset by higher sales prices as discussed
above.   Gross profit in the aggregates segment declined as a
result of volume decreases discussed above, higher depreciation
expenses and high fixed costs partially offset by higher average
selling prices.

Selling, general and administrative (SGA) expenses on a
consolidated basis for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased
to $30,294,000 as compared to $32,730,000 last year constituting
11.0% of sales as compared to 9.1% last year. The percentage
increase resulted from decreased revenues.  The decrease in the
dollar amount is primarily attributable to a $5,769,000 decrease
in profit sharing and management incentive program (which is
linked to profitability before real estate gains) partially offset
by $4,422,000 of expenses related to the merger with Vulcan.  SGA
expenses increased slightly for all three business segments.   For
corporate overhead, SGA expense decreased as a result of lower
profit sharing expense and lower risk insurance expense partially
offset by merger costs.

SGA on a consolidated basis for the first nine months of fiscal
2007 decreased to $87,316,000 as compared to $95,694,000 last year
constituting 10.6% of sales as opposed to 9.3% last year.      The
decrease in the dollar amount is primarily attributable to a
$13,871,000 decrease in profit sharing and management incentive
program (which is linked to profitability before real estate
gains) partially offset by $7,422,000 of merger expenses.  SGA
expenses for each of the business segments increased slightly.
For corporate overhead, SGA expenses decreased as a result of
profit sharing and management incentive compensation, partially
offset by merger expenses.

Consolidated operating profit decreased to $54,181,000 in the
third quarter of 2007 as compared to $90,296,000 for the same
period last year.  There are no real estate gains included in
operating profit in the third quarter as compared to $1,621,000
last year.    Operating profit for the Aggregates group decreased
to $29,247,000 from $31,704,000 last year.  This was primarily due
to the decrease in volumes.   For the Concrete Products segment
operating profit decreased to $19,649,000 from $42,953,000 last
year.   This was due to a decrease in ready-mix and block volumes,
partially offset by increased selling prices in ready-mix. For the
Cement and Calcium segment operating profit decreased to
$13,347,000 from $23,787,000 last year.

Consolidated operating profit decreased to $161,672,000 in the
first nine months of fiscal 2007 as compared to $242,421,000 for
the same period last year. Gains on sale of real estate this year
were $3,976,000 as compared to $3,312,000 last year.   Operating
profit for the Aggregates group decreased to $72,309,000 from
$81,756,000 last year, due to the decrease in volumes.  In
addition the first nine months of 2007 did not include any real
estate gains as compared to $1,427,000 last year.  For the
concrete products segment operating profit decreased to
$60,230,000 from $119,606,000 last year. This was due to a 24.6%
decrease in ready-mix volumes and 45.2% decrease in block volumes.
For the Cement and Calcium segment operating profit decreased to
$45,016,000 from $64,145,000 last year. This decrease was due to a
27.3% decrease in cement volumes partially offset by $3,972,000 of
real estate gains this year.

Interest expense for the first nine months of fiscal 2007
decreased to $128,000 as compared to $259,000 for the same period
last year. The decrease is attributable to lower secured debt
outstanding partially offset by a slight increase in average
interest rates and the capitalization of interest.

Interest income for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 decreased to
$282,000 as compared to $685,000 for the same quarter last year.
Interest income for the first nine months of fiscal 2007 increased
to $2,341,000 from $2,013,000 for the same period last year.

Included in other income is equity in operating results of our 50%
owned joint ventures.   The equity in these ventures was a gain of
$423,000 for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 as compared to a
gain of $382,000 last year. The equity in these ventures was a
loss of $423,000 for the first nine months of fiscal 2007 as
compared to a gain of $192,000 last year. Other income in 2006
also includes a gain of $2,838,000 from an exchange of real estate
resulting from the settlement of a lawsuit.

Income tax expense decreased $14,178,000 for the third quarter of
fiscal 2007 compared to the same period last year.   This is due
to lower income before taxes and lower effective income tax rate
this year. The effective income tax rate this year is 35.5% as
compared to 36.5% last year. Likewise, income tax expense
decreased $32,246,000 for the first nine months of fiscal 2007 as
compared to the same period last year. The decrease in the
effective income tax rate was due to decreased contribution to
earnings from the Concrete Products business segment which is not
subject to percentage depletion.

Net earnings for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 were $36,054,000
as compared to $58,317,000 last year.   There were no real estate
gains included in net earnings for this quarter as compared to a
pre-tax gain on real estate of $1,621,000 ($1,029,000 after tax)
in 2006.   The third quarter of fiscal 2007 includes $4,422,000
($2,852,000 after tax) of merger expenses.

Net earnings for the first nine months of fiscal 2007 were
$106,543,000 as compared to $158,142,000 last year.   Included in
net earnings for this year is the gain on sale of real estate of
$3,976,000 pre-tax ($2,565,000 after tax), as compared to a gain
on sale of real estate of $3,312,000 pre-tax ($2,103,000 after
tax), other income of $2,838,000 ($1,802,000 after tax) from an
exchange of real estate last year and merger expense of $7,422,000
($4,787,000 after tax) this year.

	Liquidity and Capital Resources.   For the first nine months
of fiscal 2007, cash provided by operating activities of
$133,006,000, exercise of stock options of $15,671,000 and
proceeds from sales of assets of $11,203,000 along with cash
available at the beginning of the period, funded purchases of
property, plant and equipment of $199,225,000.

The merger agreement contains two provisions that may impact
liquidity.  First, the merger agreement restricts the use of our
$200 million line of credit facility so that no more than $100
million may be outstanding at any time.  At present, we anticipate
that internally, cash generated by operating activities and the
reduced amount available for use under the line of credit will be
sufficient to allow us to satisfy our working capital needs and
fund our capital expenditures during the balance of the fiscal
year.  Second, the merger agreement requires us to pay to Vulcan a
$135 million termination fee under certain circumstances if the
merger agreement is terminated.

Operating Activities
During the first nine months of fiscal 2007, cash flow provided by
operations decreased as compared to the same period last year
primarily due to lower net income and a decrease in accounts
payable versus an increase last year, higher depreciation and
amortization and an increase in deferred taxes, partially offset
by slightly lower accounts receivable versus an increase last
year.

Investing Activities
For the first nine months of fiscal 2007, cash flow used in
investing activities was $197,158,000.   This resulted from
purchases of property, plant and equipment of $199,225,000, and
$7,466,000 increase in other assets. Proceeds from sales of
property, plant and equipment and other assets were $11,203,000.

Financing Activities
Cash flow provided by financing activities was $12,369,000 for the
first nine months of fiscal 2007, primarily from the proceeds from
stock option exercises and tax benefit from the exercise of stock
options partially offset by a tax payment on net stock option
exercise.

Cash generated by operating activities is used to fund the capital
expenditure program and dividend payments, and any excess cash, is
used to reduce revolving credit facilities or other debt
obligations.  If there is a shortfall, borrowings are made under
the revolving credit facilities.  Based on current expectations,
management believes that its internally generated cash flow and
access to existing credit facilities are sufficient to meet the
liquidity requirements necessary to fund operations, capital
requirements, debt service and future dividend payments.   At June
30, 2007, there was $250,000,000 available under a long-term
revolver and $35,000,000 available under overnight lines of
credit. In addition, there is approximately $29,000,000 that could
be borrowed under insurance policies. See Liquidity and Capital
Resources for the potential impact on this borrowing capacity.

Working capital at June 30, 2007 was $130,676,000 as compared to
$153,925,000 at September 30, 2006.   The major reason was a
reduction in cash which was used to fund capital expenditures.

While the Company is affected by environmental regulations, such
regulations are not ordinarily expected to have a major effect on
the Company's capital expenditures or operating results; the Lake
Belt ruling shutting down our mining operations in Miami is
temporary, pending further action by the federal courts and/or the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.


Critical Accounting Estimates.	The Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements and Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements contain information that is pertinent to Management's
Discussion and Analysis.   The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions about future events that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities.  There have been no changes in Critical Accounting
Estimates as disclosed in the Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006.

	Related Party Transactions.   Patriot Transportation Holding,
Inc. ("Patriot"), a related party, hauls diesel fuel and other
supplies for the Company.   Charges for such services are based on
prevailing market prices.   The Company also leases from Patriot
various aggregate mining and other properties paying rent or
royalties based on long-term contracts entered into during mid
1980's and early 1990's.   In addition, the Company provides
administrative services to Patriot.  These services are provided
at market prices.

On October 4, 2006, the Company entered into a 50-50 joint venture
with a subsidiary of Patriot ("FRP") to develop property near
Brooksville, Florida. We contributed approximately 553 acres of
land with a book value of $1,700,000 and FRP contributed
approximately 3,433 acres of land which the Company leased from
Patriot under a long-term mining lease.   In addition, we
contributed an additional 288 acre parcel that we acquired in
2006, and FRP reimbursed us $3,018,000 for one-half of the
acquisition costs of that parcel. The Company's investment in the
joint venture is $5,042,000 as of June 30, 2007. The Company and
FRP are each required to fund up to $2 million each in additional
capital contributions.   The Company will continue to conduct
mining operations on a portion of the property and pay royalties
to FRP based on actual tons mined.

	Outlook. Our demand levels are significantly below the record
levels of a year ago, but the Dodge reports for our markets show
slightly improved non-residential construction activity over year-
ago levels.  Highway and infrastructure spending remains strong;
nevertheless, our volumes will remain below year-ago levels until
the excess residential inventory is absorbed.  We continue to be
optimistic about our markets and the incredible long term future
they hold.

	For discussion of the issues surrounding the Miami quarry,
refer to Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.

	We purchased cement and clinker for our cement grinding and
import facilities, under a three year contract that expired at the
end of 2006.   Some of the purchases under the contract have been
extended into calendar 2007. These purchases have been at prices
below the current spot prices for the product.   The prices to be
paid upon the expiration of the contract will depend on market
prices for the product and shipping rates.   It is currently
estimated that after this contract and extensions expire, our cost
of purchases could increase by $30-35 per ton.


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk.

There are no material changes to the disclosures made in Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 on this matter.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures.

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
the Company's reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the "Exchange Act"), is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to management, including the Company's Chief
Executive Officer ("CEO"), Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), and
Chief Accounting Officer ("CAO"), as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Company also maintains a system of  internal accounting
controls over financial reporting that are designed to provide
reasonable assurance to the Company's management and Board of
Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of
published financial statements.

All control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent
limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be
effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives.

As of June 30, 2007, the Company, under the supervision and with
the participation of the Company's management, including the CEO,
CFO and CAO, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures.  Based on this evaluation, the Company's CEO, CFO and
CAO concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in alerting them in a timely manner to
material information required to be included in periodic SEC
filings.

There have been no changes in the Company's internal controls over
financial reporting during the third quarter that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting.


PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

On March 22, 2006, the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Florida ruled that the mining permit issued for our Miami
quarry, as well as several permits issued to competitors in the same
region, had been improperly issued. The Court remanded the permitting
process to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for further review and
consideration.

On July 13, 2007, the Court ruled that the Company must cease all
mining excavation at the Miami quarry, effective on July 17, 2007,
pending the issuance by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers of a
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement.

The Court based its decision to shut down mining activity of the Miami
quarry and two quarries owned by competitors on concern that levels of
benzene had been detected in an area of the Biscayne Aquifer known as
the Northwest Wellfield, which supplies a significant portion of the
water supply to the Miami area.  At this time, the Company does not
know whether the benzene was produced by the Company's mining
activities, but the Company does not believe that the levels of benzene
pose a risk to human health.

For the nine months ended June 30, 2007, we sold 2,467,000 tons of
aggregates from the Miami quarry, generating $28,673,000 in revenues. A
significant portion of this volume is shipped by rail to Central and
Northeast Florida and used in our concrete production facilities in
Southeastern Florida, Central Florida and Jacksonville.  Our Miami
quarry employs 68 persons and has property, plant and equipment of
approximately $78,967,000 of which $23,544,000 is land.

We estimate that recoverable reserves at the Miami quarry (assuming
that mining is permitted to continue in the long term) are
approximately 135 million tons.

The Company has performed an impairment analysis in accordance with
SFAS No. 144,"Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets," and has determined that the assets are not impaired at this
time. In the event the Corp of Engineers does not re-issue a permit to
resume mining, the Company plans to transfer all movable assets to
other locations. The recoverability of the remaining assets, consisting
of land and infrastructure, would depend on the value of the land for
alternative uses. Depending on potential usage of the land this could
result in an impairment charge of zero to $35 million.

At present, the Company is utilizing stockpiled materials from the
Miami quarry while working to implement contingency plans to provide an
alternative source of aggregates for use in the Company's concrete
operations in the southeastern, north central and northeastern portions
of Florida.  Depending on market conditions, the Company currently
plans to source aggregates for these operations by (i) purchasing
aggregates from competitors (which would reduce the revenues of the
Company's Florida aggregates operations) or (ii) transporting
aggregates from the Company's Ft. Myers quarry.  In either event, this
development will lead to increased costs to the Company's Florida
concrete operations, and the Company is uncertain as to whether the
Company will be able to pass along these costs to customers.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you
should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, "Item 1A.
Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006, which could materially affect our business,
financial condition or future results.  The risks described in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we
currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect
our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Failure to complete the Merger with Vulcan could materially adversely
affect our results of operations and our stock price.  On February 19,
2007, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Vulcan
Materials Company and certain related parties.  Completion of the
merger is subject to approval by our shareholders, regulatory
approvals, and other customary closing conditions. We cannot assure you
that these conditions will be met or waived, that necessary approvals
will be obtained, or that we will be able to successfully complete the
merger as currently contemplated under the merger agreement or at all.
 If the merger is not completed:

*	We may not realize any or all of the potential benefits of
the merger, including any synergies that could result from
combining the financial and proprietary resources of us and
Vulcan;
*	We will remain liable for significant transaction costs,
including legal, accounting, financial advisory and other
costs relating to the merger;
*	Under certain circumstances, we may have to pay a
termination fee to Vulcan in the amount of $135 million;
*	The attention of our management and our employees may be
diverted from day-to-day operations;
*	Our customers may seek to modify or terminate existing
agreements, or prospective customers may delay entering into
new agreements or purchasing our products as a result of the
announcement of the merger; and
*	Our ability to attract new employees and retain our existing
employees may be harmed by uncertainties associated with the
merger.

The occurrence of any of these events individually or in combination
could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and
our stock price.

Florida Rock shareholders may not receive the form of merger
consideration that they elect for all their shares and may receive in
part a form of consideration that has lower value.  The merger
agreement contains provisions that are designed to ensure that, in the
aggregate, 70% of Florida Rock shares will be converted into cash and
30% of Florida Rock shares will be converted into Holdco common shares.
The value of the share consideration at the time of the merger may be
higher than the value of the cash consideration at such time, or vice
versa.  If elections are made by Florida Rock shareholders to receive
more cash or more shares of Holdco than these percentages, either those
electing to receive cash or those electing to receive shares of Holdco,
respectively, will have the consideration of the type they selected
reduced by a pro rata amount, and will receive a portion of their
consideration in the form that they did not elect to receive.
Accordingly, it is likely that a substantial number of Florida Rock
shareholders will not receive a portion of the merger consideration in
the form that they elect and that the consideration they do receive
will have a lower value than what they elected to receive.

Because the exchange ratio is fixed, the market value of Holdco common
stock issued to Florida Rock shareholders may be less than the value of
their shares of Florida Rock common stock.  Florida Rock shareholders
who receive shares in the Florida Rock merger will receive a fixed
number of shares of common stock of Holdco rather than a number of
shares with a particular fixed market value.  The market values of
Vulcan and Florida Rock common stock at the time of the merger may vary
significantly from their prices on the date the merger agreement was
executed, the date of the proxy statement/prospectus or the date on
which Florida Rock shareholders vote on the Florida Rock merger.
Because the exchange ratio will not be adjusted to reflect any changes
in the market value of Vulcan or Florida Rock common stock, the market
value of the Holdco common stock issued in the Florida Rock merger and
the Florida Rock common stock surrendered in the Florida Rock merger
may be higher or lower than the values of such shares on such earlier
dates, and may be higher or lower than the $67.00 to be paid to Florida
Rock shareholders in the cash portion of the Florida Rock merger.
Stock price changes may result from a variety of factors, including
changes in their businesses and operations, and other factors that are
beyond the control of Vulcan and Florida Rock, including changes in
their business prospects, regulatory considerations and general and
industry specific market and economic conditions.  Neither Vulcan nor
Florida Rock is permitted to terminate the merger agreement solely
because of changes in the market price of either party's common stock.

If Florida Rock shareholders deliver their Florida Rock shares to the
exchange agent to make an election, they will not be able to sell those
shares, unless they revoke their election prior to the election
deadline or the merger agreement is terminated.  The deadline for
making a cash or share election for Florida Rock shares is the day of
the special meeting of Florida Rock shareholders to vote on approval of
the merger agreement, unless the completion of the Florida Rock merger
will occur more than four business days following the date of this
special meeting, in which case the election deadline will be extended
until two business days before the completion of the Florida Rock
merger.  After the shareholder submits a form of election, under the
terms of the election, the shareholder will not be able to sell any
Florida Rock shares covered by the form of election, regardless of
whether those shares are held in certificated or book-entry form,
unless the shareholder revokes the election before the deadline by
providing written notice to the exchange agent.  If the election is not
revoked, the shareholder will not be able to sell the Florida Rock
shares covered by a form of election prior to completion of the Florida
Rock merger.  In the time between submission of a form of election and
the completion of the Florida Rock merger, the trading price of Florida
Rock common stock may change, and the shareholder might otherwise want
to sell Florida Rock shares covered by a form of election to gain
access to cash, make other investments, or reduce the potential for an
adverse change in the value of the investment.

We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the merger, which
could adversely affect the value of Holdco stock.  The merger involves
the integration of two companies that have previously operated
independently.  Vulcan and Florida Rock expect the combined company to
result in financial and operational benefits, including enhanced
earnings growth, overhead savings, operating cost savings and other
synergies.  However, to realize the anticipated benefits from the
merger, we must successfully combine the businesses of Vulcan and
Florida Rock in a manner that permits this earnings growth and cost
savings.  In addition, we must achieve these savings without adversely
affecting revenues.  If we are not able to successfully achieve these
objectives, the anticipated benefits of the merger may not be realized
fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected.

The failure to integrate successfully Vulcan's and Florida Rock's
businesses and operations in the expected timeframe may adversely
affect Holdco's future results.  Vulcan and Florida Rock have operated
and, until the completion of the merger, will continue to operate,
independently.  Vulcan and Florida Rock will face significant
challenges in consolidating functions, integrating their organizations,
procedures and operations in a timely and efficient manner and
retaining key Vulcan and Florida Rock personnel.  The integration of
Vulcan and Florida Rock will be costly, complex and time consuming.

The integration process and other disruptions from the merger
transaction could be more costly than we expect or result in the loss
of key employees, the disruption of each company's ongoing businesses
or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that
adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with customers,
suppliers, employees and others with whom we have business dealings or
to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger.

Integrating Vulcan and Florida Rock may divert management's attention
away from operations.  Successful integration of Vulcan's and Florida
Rock's organizations, procedures and operations may place a significant
burden on the managements of Vulcan and Florida Rock and their internal
resources.  The integration efforts could divert management's focus and
resources from other strategic opportunities and from operational
matters during the integration process.

Officers and directors of Florida Rock have certain interests in the
Florida Rock merger that are different from, or in addition to,
interests of Florida Rock shareholders.  These interests may be
perceived to have affected their decision to support or approve the
Florida Rock merger.  Florida Rock officers and directors have certain
interests in the Florida Rock merger that are different from, or in
addition to, interests of Florida Rock shareholders.  These interests
include, but are not limited to, the treatment of stock options held by
directors and executive officers of Florida Rock in the Florida Rock
merger (including the acceleration of stock options), the vesting and
accelerated payment of certain retirement benefits and the potential
payment of certain severance benefits to executive officers, the
continued employment after the merger of Thompson S. Baker II as
President of the Florida Rock division of Holdco, John D. Baker II's
service as a director of Holdco after the merger, the possible purchase
by Edward L. Baker and John D. Baker II from Florida Rock of a 6,300
acre property prior to the merger, the support agreement between Vulcan
and certain members and affiliates of the Baker family, the
shareholders agreement among Vulcan, Holdco and certain members and
affiliates of the Baker family, and the indemnification of former
Florida Rock officers and directors by Holdco.

Vulcan's incurrence of additional debt to pay the cash portion of the
merger consideration will significantly increase Vulcan's interest
expense, financial leverage and debt service requirements.  Vulcan
anticipates borrowing approximately $3.3 billion to $3.4 billion in
order to pay for Florida Rock common stock and acquisition related
transaction costs.  Incurrence of this new debt will significantly
increase the combined company's leverage.  While management believes
Holdco's cash flows will be more than adequate to service this debt,
there may be circumstances in which required payments of principal
and/or interest on this new debt could adversely affect Holdco's cash
flows and operating results, and therefore the market price of Holdco
stock.

Florida Rock and Vulcan may not be able to obtain the regulatory
approvals required to consummate the merger unless they agree to
material restrictions or conditions.  Completion of the merger is
conditioned upon the receipt of all required governmental consents and
authorizations, including under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act.  Vulcan and
Florida Rock intend to pursue all of these consents and authorizations
as required by and in accordance with the terms of the merger
agreement.  Complying with requests from governmental agencies,
including requests for additional information and documents, could
delay consummation of the merger.  In connection with granting these
consents and authorizations, governmental authorities may require
divestitures of Vulcan or Florida Rock assets or seek to impose
conditions on Holdco's operations after completion of the merger.  Such
divestitures or conditions may jeopardize or delay completion of the
merger or may reduce the anticipated benefits of the merger.

The merger agreement contains provisions that could affect the
decisions of a third party considering making an alternative
acquisition proposal to the Florida Rock merger.  Under the terms of
the merger agreement, Florida Rock will be required to pay to Vulcan a
termination fee of $135 million if the merger agreement is terminated
under certain circumstances.  In addition, the merger agreement limits
the ability of Florida Rock to initiate, solicit, encourage or
facilitate certain acquisition or merger proposals from a third party.
These provisions could affect the structure, pricing and terms proposed
by a third party seeking to acquire or merge with Florida Rock and
could deter such party from making a competing acquisition proposal.

Former Florida Rock shareholders who become shareholders of Holdco will
be governed by the restated certificate of incorporation and restated
by-laws of Holdco.  Florida Rock shareholders who receive Holdco common
stock in the Florida Rock merger will become Holdco shareholders and
their rights as shareholders will be governed by the restated
certificate of incorporation and restated by-laws of Holdco and New
Jersey corporate law.  As a result, there will be material differences
between the current rights of Florida Rock shareholders and the rights
they can expect to have as Holdco shareholders.

A purported shareholder class action complaint has been filed against
Florida Rock and the members of its board of directors challenging the
merger, and an unfavorable judgment or ruling in this lawsuit could
prevent or delay the consummation of the merger and result in
substantial costs.  Florida Rock and the members of its board of
directors were named in a purported shareholder class action complaint
filed in Florida state court (the Duval County Circuit Court) on March
6, 2007, captioned Dillinger v. Florida Rock, et al., Case No. 16-
20007-CA-001906.  The complaint seeks to enjoin the merger, and
alleges, among other things, that the directors have breached their
fiduciary duties owed to Florida Rock shareholders by attempting to
sell Florida Rock to Vulcan for an inadequate price.

Florida Rock is obliged under certain circumstances to indemnify and
hold harmless each director and officer from and against any and all
claims and liabilities to which such director shall have become subject
by reason of being a director, to the full extent permitted under
Florida law.  An adverse outcome in this lawsuit could prevent or delay
the consummation of the merger and result in substantial costs to
Florida Rock and/or Vulcan.  It is also possible that other similar
lawsuits may be filed in the future.  Florida Rock cannot reasonably
estimate any possible loss from current or future litigation at this
time.

Item 6.  Exhibits

The response to this item is submitted as a separate section
entitled "Exhibit Index" starting on page 33 of this Form 10-Q.


                         SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

July 31, 2007                 FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC.


                            JOHN D. BAKER II
                            John D. Baker II
                               President and Chief Executive
                                 Officer

                            JOHN D. MILTON JR.
	                    John D. Milton Jr.
                                Executive Vice President,
                                 Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                 Officer

                            WALLACE A. PATZKE, JR.
                            Wallace A. Patzke, Jr.
                               Vice President, Controller and
                                 Chief Accounting Officer














              FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC.
	FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2007
	            EXHIBIT INDEX

(4)		Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated
February 19, 2007, between Florida Rock
Industries, Inc. and American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, incorporated by reference to an
exhibit previously filed with Form 8-K filed
on February 21, 2007.  File No. 1-7159.

(11)   	Computation of Earnings Per Common Share.

(14)		Financial Code of Ethical Conduct.
Previously filed with Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended 	September 30, 2003.File No. 1-7159

(31)(a)	Certification of John D. Baker, II

(31)(b)	Certification of John D. Milton, Jr.

(31)(c)	Certification of Wallace A. Patzke, Jr.

(32)	     Certification under Section 906 of Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002

(99)(a)	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
February 19, 2007, by and among Vulcan
Materials Company, Florida Rock Industries,
Inc., Virginia Holdco, Inc., Virginia Merger
Sub, Inc. and Fresno Merger Sub, Inc.,
incorporated by reference to an exhibit
previously filed with Form 8-K filed on
February 21, 2007.  File No. 1-7159.

(99)(b)	Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of April 9, 2007, by and
among Vulcan Materials Company, Florida Rock
Industries, Inc., Virginia Holdco, Inc.,
Virginia Merger Sub, Inc. and Fresno Merger
Sub, Inc.

(99)(c)	Support Agreement, dated as of February 19,
2007, by and among Vulcan Materials Company,
Baker Holdings, L.P., Edward L. Baker Living
Trust, Edward L. Baker, John D. Baker II
Living Trust and Anne D. Baker Living Trust,
incorporated by reference to an exhibit
previously filed with Form 8-K filed on
February 21, 2007.  File No. 1-7159.