alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismiss and Opinion Filed July 30, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00924-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.M. AND A.M., Children

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-08-20402

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Fillmore, Myers, and Evans

Opinion by Justice Evans

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By order dated December 31, 2014, we ordered 

this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record and appellant’s brief to be filed within thirty 

days because appellant failed to respond to our October 27, 2014 letter directing appellant to 

provide the Court with written verification he had requested the record and had paid for or made 

arrangements to pay for the record, or had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. 

By postcard dated February 6, 2015, we notified appellant the time for filing his brief had 

expired. We directed appellant to file his brief and an extension motion within ten days. We 

cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the 

dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed a brief, filed an 

extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 
–2–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b),(c).

140924F.P05

/David W. Evans/

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF D.M. AND A.M., 

Children

No. 05-14-00924-CV 

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-08-20402.

Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. Justices 

Fillmore and Myers participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee Kenyatta McGill recover her costs of this appeal from 

appellant Frederick McGill.

Judgment entered this 30th day of July, 2015.
#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the SABINE RIVER AUTHORITY, State of Louisiana, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank P. PIERCE et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11323.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Jan. 6, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 3, 1970.

Writ Refused Feb. 27, 1970.

W. R. Jackson, Jr., Leesville, E. L. Edwards, Jr., Many, for plaintiff-appellant.

Harris & Harris, by Goodwyn H. Harris, Jr., William T. Pegues, Mansfield, for defendants-appellees.

Before AYRES, DIXON and WILLIAMS, JJ.

DIXON, Judge.

This case was consolidated for the purpose of trial with No. 11,322, State of Louisiana, through the Sabine River Authority, State of Louisiana v. Pierce et al., La.App., 230 So.2d 751. Both cases involve the expropriation of tracts of land in DeSoto Parish by the Sabine River Authority. There was judgment in each case in favor of the defendants.

The plaintiff appealed, but, until after the day fixed for submission of the case, made no appearance nor filed any brief.

Under the authority of Rule VII, Section 5(b) of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, the appeal should be dismissed. See Benedict v. Stulb, 230 La. 995, 89 So.2d 768.

Appeal dismissed.
#### In re RULES GOVERNING ASSIGNMENT to Duty of RETIRED JUSTICES AND JUDGES.

No. 39859.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 24, 1970.

1. Every retired Justice or Judge desiring to be assigned to Judicial Service under the provisions of Article V of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A., and applicable statutes shall file with the Clerk of this Court a consent therefor, which consent shall be in the following form and contain the information required thereby:

CONSENT TO BE ASSIGNED TO JUDICIAL SERVICE

To the Chief Justice and Justices of the Florida Supreme Court

I hereby consent to be assigned, temporarily, to Judicial Service in the courts of Florida where I am qualified to serve.

The following information is submitted to you in connection with this consent and as a basis for making such assignments as from time to time shall be expedient:

A. I served on the__ Court as an active member thereof from _ to_, a period of_years.

B. I retired from service _ and am presently a resident of_

C. My retirement compensation, if any, is $_

D. I am not engaged in the practice of law, directly or indirectly.

E. I am not engaged in any business activity or partisan politics that would interfere with the proper performance of judicial duties under the Code of Judicial Ethics.

F. If assigned to judicial service I will promptly dispose of all matters and perform all duties assigned to me.

*770G. I am able to perform effectively such judicial duties as will be assigned to me.

H. I am familiar with the method of determining extra compensation for such services and will maintain and submit to the Comptroller accurate records of all time served.

It is understood that I may withdraw this consent at any time. In such event, my name will be stricken from the assignment roster until a new application is filed and accepted by you.



2.Upon the filing of the above consent the same shall be delivered to the Chief Justice for action by the Court at an early conference. If said consent be approved by four justices, the name of said consenting justice or judge shall be enrolled on a “Retired Justice or Judge Official Roster” to be kept in the Clerk’s office.

3. The Chief Justice may temporarily assign any justice or judge whose name is on such Roster to Judicial Service on any court where he is qualified to serve for a continuous period not to exceed thirty (30) days on any one assignment — consecutive assignments of additional periods may be made only after approval by the Court.

4. Copies of this Rule shall be forwarded to all retired justices and judges in this State by the Clerk.

5. This Rule shall become effective October 31, 1970.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the audited
consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended March 29,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Form 10-KSB for fiscal
1998.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000935226
<NAME>                        BENIHANA INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-29-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                               1,169
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          385
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          3,768
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     6,080
<PP&E>                                              32,998
<DEPRECIATION>                                      36,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      58,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               11,262
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              1
<COMMON>                                               609
<OTHER-SE>                                          14,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        58,157
<SALES>                                             99,062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    99,757
<CGS>                                               25,894
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       58,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     5,408
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      8,862
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2,922
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  5,940
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         5,940
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .93
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Frontier Internet, Inc.
(f/k/a Fremont Corporation) (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the periods
ended: March 31, 2002; June 30, 2002; and September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sandy
Landstrom, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Wireless Frontier Internet, Inc. and will be retained by
Wireless Frontier Internet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

May 27, 2004                        /s/ Sandy Landstrom
                                    --------------------
                                    Sandy Landstrom
                                    Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal C 132A/13 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 132A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6113 April 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 132A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6113 April 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2018/C 132 A/01 | Recruitment notice PE/216/S — Director (F/M) (function group AD, grade 14) — Directorate-General for Communication — Directorate for Media | 1 |
| 2018/C 132 A/02 | Recruitment notice PE/217/S — Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14) — Directorate-General for Communication — Directorate for Campaigns | 7 |
| 2018/C 132 A/03 | Recruitment notice PE/218/S — Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14) — Directorate-General for Translation — Directorate for Translation | 12 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2018/C 132 A/01

Recruitment notice PE/216/S — Director (F/M) (function group AD, grade 14) — Directorate-General for Communication — Directorate for Media

1

2018/C 132 A/02

Recruitment notice PE/217/S — Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14) — Directorate-General for Communication — Directorate for Campaigns

7

2018/C 132 A/03

Recruitment notice PE/218/S — Director (F/M) (Function group AD, grade 14) — Directorate-General for Translation — Directorate for Translation

12

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,869
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  197,290
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,770)
<INVENTORY>                                    165,103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               378,443
<PP&E>                                         205,930
<DEPRECIATION>                                (79,941)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 862,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          159,542
<BONDS>                                        477,129
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,262
<OTHER-SE>                                     196,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   862,391
<SALES>                                        677,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               677,710
<CGS>                                          384,489
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  384,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               234,156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,653
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,916
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,834
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,082
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,082
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
        

</TABLE>
#### John S. KIRK and wife, Leitha Kirk, Appellants, v. NORTHGATE FORD, INC. and Fred Phelps and wife, Rose Phelps, Appellees.

No. 71-12.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 26, 1972.

David A. Maney, Tampa, for appellants.

Frank Bezoni, of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellee Northgate Ford; Robert H. Carlton, Tampa, for appellees Phelps.

PER CURIAM.

This was a suit to remove clouds on title to lands and to establish boundaries. The judgment of the trial court comes to this court with an assumption of correctness. After hearing oral argument and reading the briefs and record contained in this cause, no reversible error has been shown; and for that reason the judgment entered by the trial court is.hereby affirmed.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
#### Quick *v.*E. B. Kintner & Son et al., Appellants.

*109Argued March 6, 1934.

Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*Russell L. Mervine,*and with him *John M. Kelly,*for appellant.

J. *Harry Morosini,*for appellee.

April 23, 1934:

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The defendants are engaged in the butcher business. They decided to enlarge their storeroom and to construct, for renting purposes, two apartments on the second floor. They employed the claimant as a carpenter, who worked on the improvements from March 6th until June 1,1932, when he was injured. The claimant filed his petition for compensation. The defendants denied liability on the ground that claimant’s work was casual and not in the regular course of their business. The referee awarded compensation and his action was approved by the hoard and sustained by the court below.

The facts are very similar to, and the legal questions *110involved are the same as in Fedak v. Dzialdowski, 113 Pa. Superior Ct. 104, 172 A. 187, in which ease we have handed down an opinion this day. Our disposition of that ease controls this proceeding and makes a further elaboration, other than to refer briefly to cases cited by appellee, unnecessary.

The appellee relies upon Sgattone v. Mulholland & Gotwals, Inc. et al., 290 Pa. 341, 138 A. 855; Fedak v. Dzialdowski, as reported in 101 Pa. Superior Ct. 347; Hauger v. Walker Co. et al., 277 Pa. 506, 121 A. 200; and Dunlap v. Paradise Camp et al., 305 Pa. 516, 158 A. 265. In the first case, the claimant was a regular employee of DiSandro & Son, sewer contractors, loaned to the defendants who were engaged in developing land and constructing houses, which was their usual business. The Fedak case, as we have already shown, affords no support for the appellee’s contention. In the Hauger case, it appears that the claimant was injured while engaged in the regular course of his employer’s business. In the last case cited, the claimant was a regular employee of the defendant. These authorities, therefore, are dissimilar in important features to the case at bar and not decisive of the question before us.

Judgment is reversed and now entered for defendants.
Exhibit 32.1

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Winfield Capital
Corp. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul A.
Perlin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

              1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

              2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  June 18, 2004                     By: /s/ PAUL A. PERLIN
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Paul A. Perlin
                                              Chief Executive Officer & Director


                  A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary of financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheet and statement of earnings for the six
months ended September 29, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                SEP-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-29-2000
<CASH>                               143,586
<SECURITIES>                           3,041
<RECEIVABLES>                        867,769
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                          441,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   1,542,374
<PP&E>                               979,294

<DEPRECIATION>                       361,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     3,302,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              1,386,026
<BONDS>                              654,338
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                175,000
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              40,748
<OTHER-SE>                           323,557
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       3,302,257
<SALES>                            2,835,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   2,880,595
<CGS>                              2,735,545
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      2,753,545
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    59,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       39,924
<INCOME-TAX>                          12,760
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   27,164
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          27,164
<EPS-BASIC>                              .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .67



</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1












July 14, 2010

Analyst Contact:
Andrew Ziola918-588-7163Media Contact:
Brad Borror918-588-7582






ONEOK Partners Increases Quarterly Distribution
 
 TULSA, Okla. – July 14, 2010 – The board of directors of the general partner of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) today increased the partnership’s quarterly cash distribution to $1.12 per unit from $1.11 per unit, effective for the second quarter 2010, resulting in an annualized cash distribution of $4.48 per unit. The distribution is payable August 13, 2010, to unitholders of record as of July 30, 2010.
 
 “The distribution increase reflects our confidence in the continued growth of the partnership,” said John W. Gibson, chairman, president and chief executive officer of ONEOK Partners. “We continue to benefit from the development of new projects and the completion of our more than $2 billion investment program late last year, which create value for our unitholders and provides opportunities to increase our distributions.”
 
 ONEOK Partners has increased its distribution by 40 percent since April 2006, when a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) became the sole general partner.
  
 
 ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy company, which owns 42.8 percent of the overall partnership interest. ONEOK is one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S.
 
 For more information, visit the website at www.oneokpartners.com.
 
 Some of the statements contained and incorporated in this news release are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements relate to financial adjustments in connection with the accelerated share repurchase program and other matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements in certain circumstances.
 
 This news release serves as qualified notice to nominees as provided for under Treasury Regulation Sections 1.144-4(b)(4) and (d). Please note that 100 percent of ONEOK Partners, L.P.’s distributions to foreign investors are attributable to income that is effectively connected with a United States trade or business. Accordingly, all of
  
  ONEOK Partners, L.P.’s distributions to foreign investors are subject to federal income tax withholding at the highest effective tax rate for individuals or corporations, as applicable. Nominees, and not ONEOK Partners, L.P., are treated as withholding agents responsible for withholding on the distributions received by them on behalf of foreign investors. OKS-FD OKE-FD
 
  ###
#### CITY OF NORTH MIAMI et al., Appellants, v. OUTRIGGER CLUB, INC., Appellee.

No. 72-1466.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 11, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.