alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to June 23, 2020)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-19-882 State v. Smith

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 742

To amend chapter 11 of title 31, United States Code, to require that the

annual budget submitted by the President includes a statement of revenues obtained from the sale, lease, and transfer of Government assets,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1993

Mr. SYNAR (for himself and Mr. MILLER of California) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Operations

A BILL

To amend chapter 11 of title 31, United States Code, to

require that the annual budget submitted by the President includes a statement of revenues obtained from

the sale, lease, and transfer of Government assets, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Investment

5 Recovery, Economic Security and Liquidation Examina6 tion and Disclosure Act’’.
2

•HR 742 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVENUES FROM SALE, LEASE, AND TRANSFER OF

2 ASSETS.

3 Section 1105(a) of chapter 11 of title 31, United

4 States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the follow5 ing new paragraph:

6 ‘‘(28) a separate statement of—

7 ‘‘(A) projected revenues during the fiscal

8 year for which the budget is submitted from the

9 anticipated sale, lease, or transfer of any phys10 ical asset; and

11 ‘‘(B) the estimated price at which this

12 asset or a comparable asset would be sold in an

13 arms length transaction in the private sector;

14 asset by asset and aggregated by major functional

15 category.’’.

16 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

17 The amendment made by section 2 shall become ef18 fective for fiscal year 1994 and shall be fully reflected in

19 the fiscal year 1994 budget submitted by the President

20 in February 1993 as required by section 1105(a) of title

21 31, United States Code.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Motors Corporation (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John M.
Devine, Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.


/s/ JOHN M. DEVINE
-------------------
John M. Devine
Vice Chairman and
Chief Financial Officer
August 6, 2004




































                                       40
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,982
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,356)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,675
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,644
<PP&E>                                          41,521
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,354)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,002
<BONDS>                                          6,796
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,106
<SALES>                                          7,845
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,272
<CGS>                                            5,948
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  151,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (743)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,647
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,919
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,370
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,507
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,863
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,863
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
(A) FORM 10-Q QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 20, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000039092
<NAME> FRIEDMAN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          16,137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,517,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 29,119,743
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,969,690
<PP&E>                                      19,847,463
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,674,887
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,025,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,661,906
<BONDS>                                      7,200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,548,921
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,081,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,025,463
<SALES>                                     31,064,827
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,094,921
<CGS>                                       28,585,878
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,717,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             158,687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,219,210
<INCOME-TAX>                                   414,531
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            804,679
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   804,679
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of Multi-Media Tutorial Services,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended February 29, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") on the date
hereof, I, Barry Reichman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 certify that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));;
and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
materially respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of
the dates presented and consolidated result of operations of the Company for the
period presented.

Date: January 18, 2005
                                        By: /s/ Barry Reichman
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Chief Executive Officer,
                                            Chief Financial Officer and Director

This certificate has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF U.S. AUTOMOBILE ACCEPTANCE 1995-1,
INC., AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH DECEMBER 31, 1999
10-K
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,503,817
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,503,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,503,817
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,628,183)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,361,052)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

               Wedge-Net Associate Application and Confidentiality

Signing this document, I do agree to the following specific conditions:


1.   I shall not share, distribute or in any way divulge any information, ideas,
     concepts,  plans or research  being done by this group,  to any third party
     for a period of three years.
2.   I shall agree not to develop  independently,  compete or produce  a product
     or service in direct or indirect  competition with the products we may plan
     to develop or actually develop for a period of three years from this date.
3.   I am  not  employed  by,  nor  do I  represent  any  other  agency,  group,
     individual  or firm who might benefit from those ideas and concepts we will
     develop.
4.   Should I become employed by another agency, group, individual or firm which
     might  benefit  from  our  ideas or  products,  I agree  not to share  such
     information for a period of three years from this date.
5.   I will continue to represent  myself,  the other associates and the company
     in a positive and  professional  manner at all times.  I will assist in the
     promotion,  reputation and continued  success of the company to the best of
     my ability.  I agree not to participate in any activity which might reflect
     poorly on our  organization  or represent  the  organization  in a false or
     misleading manner.



Full Name  Aaron Stubblefield        Signature /s/ Aaron Stubblefield
          --------------------                -----------------------

Signed with Gregory M. Walters, President present.  Endorsed.

Signature /s/ Gregory M. Walters Dated this 23 day of Sept, 2000.
          ----------------------            --        ----   ---
#### Emilio XIQUES, Jr., Petitioner, v. Harry Lee COE, III, Circuit Judge, Respondent.

No. 73-642.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 8, 1973.

Mandamus denied.
# Official Journal C 16/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 16 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5024 January 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 16

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5024 January 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 016/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |
| 2007/C 016/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4470 — Apollo Group/Jacuzzi Brands) (1) | 2 |
| 2007/C 016/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4446 — Arrow Electronics/IN Technology) (1) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 016/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

2007/C 016/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4470 — Apollo Group/Jacuzzi Brands) (1)

2

2007/C 016/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4446 — Arrow Electronics/IN Technology) (1)

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 016/04 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2007/C 016/04

Euro exchange rates

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 016/05 | MEDIA — Support for the transnational distribution of European films and audiovisual works on video (VHS and DVD) | 4 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL AND COMPETITION POLICY |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 016/06 | Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures | 5 |
| 2007/C 016/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4517 — Iberdrola/ScottishPower) (1) | 6 |
| 2007/C 016/08 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4532 — LUKOIL/CONOCOPHILLIPS) (1) | 7 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2007/C 016/05

MEDIA — Support for the transnational distribution of European films and audiovisual works on video (VHS and DVD)

4

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL AND COMPETITION POLICY

Commission

2007/C 016/06

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

5

2007/C 016/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4517 — Iberdrola/ScottishPower) (1)

6

2007/C 016/08

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4532 — LUKOIL/CONOCOPHILLIPS) (1)

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 774 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 774

 To temporarily suspend the duty on certain lead fuel test assemblies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1993

Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut (for herself and Mrs. Kennelly) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To temporarily suspend the duty on certain lead fuel test assemblies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN LEAD FUEL TEST ASSEMBLIES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
the Treasury shall--
            (1) liquidate or reliquidate as free of duty any entry of 
        any partially assembled lead fuel assembly (described in 
        subsection (b)) made--
                    (A) on March 9, 1990 (Entry No. 110-0675952-3),
                    (B) on September 19, 1990 (Entry No. 110-1525996-
                0),
                    (C) on November 7, 1990 (Entry No. 110-3667810-7), 
                and
                    (D) on December 21, 1990 (Entry No. 110-1526938-1), 
                and
            (2) refund any duties paid with respect to such entry, if 
        certification is given that such entry will be reexported or 
        destroyed within eight years of entry and such certification is 
        submitted to the appropriate customs officer within sixty days 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Partially Assembled Lead Fuel Assembly.--A partially assembled 
lead fuel assembly is described in this subsection if it consists of 
not more than 4 partially assembled fuel bundles, composed of nuclear 
fuel rods of zircaloy tubes filled with slightly enriched uranium 
dioxide (UO<INF>2) pellets, arranged into bundles of 96 rods, including 
a channel and upper handles and lower tie plates.

                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. ENTERTAINMENT SPECIALISTS, INC. d/b/a Glenwood Theater.

No. 62842.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 22, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 31, 1978.

In re: Entertainment Specialists, Inc,, applying for writ of certiorari, (review), prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Cad-do.

Writ granted. It is ordered that film seized be, returned to relator; further ordered that injunction be vacated and set aside. See *Roaden v. Kentucky,*413 U.S. 496, 93 S.Ct. 2796, 37 L.Ed.2d 757 (1973).

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J.,

dissent from the order returning this film, since, in their opinion, the film is held under a valid order of the district judge.
#### Mrs. Erla B. HENRY v. MISSISSIPPI STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION.

No. 45643.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 16, 1970.

Robert Oswald, Pascagoula, for appellant.

Cumbest, Cumbest & Shaddock, Pasca-goula, for appellee.

RODGERS, Justice:

This is an eminent domain proceeding originating in the County Court of Jackson County, Mississippi. The Mississippi State Highway Commission sought to acquire one and nine one-hundredths (1.09) acres of land belonging to appellant, Erla B. Henry, for highway purposes. The appellant owns a small tract of land, oblong in shape, having an area of seven and sixty-five one-hundreths (7.65) acres. The strip sought to be acquired is on the east side of the property and the appellant will have no access to the proposed road on the east of her property, but will have access from the north.

The appraisers for the Commission testified to “the before and after taking” value of the property. The attorney for defendant, Mrs. Henry, attempted to show the value of this tract of property as lots and fix the value upon “front footage.” The appellant bases this contention upon the case of Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Brooks, 239 Miss. 308, 123 So.2d 423 (1960). This case simply holds that the value of land is not to be determined on the basis of the condition in which the owner maintained it, but rather with reference to any use to which it is reasonably adaptable, provided there is some probability that the land may be used for that purpose within a reasonable time. The jury may consider that the land is valuable as potential residential property, or other use for which the land is adapted. The holding in *Brooks*alludes, of course, to the present value of the land, taking into consideration, its adaptability. It does not mean that the present value of the land may be determined to be of equal value as established residential property or valued on a lot footage basis, as if the undeveloped land were a residential or business subdivision. The purpose of permitting the intro*779duction of evidence to show adaptability of land is to show why the property would sell in the present market for more than undeveloped land with no impending future development.

We think the following cases control our decision in the instant case: Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Duckworth, 203 So.2d 591 (Miss.1967); Green Acres Memorial Park, Inc. v. Mississippi State Highway Commission, 246 Miss. 855, 153 So.2d 286 (1963).

A careful examination of the record in this case reveals no reversible error and for that reason the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ETHRIDGE, C. J., and JONES, BRADY and SMITH, JJ., concur.
#### George CONYERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1535.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 19, 1974.

George Conyers, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within *249which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof, upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.