alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Salvatore Francis DiPIETRO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1218.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 27, 1972.

Eugene P. Spellman, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Walker v. State, 44 Fla. 466, 32 So. 954; Redditt v. State, Fla. 1955, 84 So.2d 317; Robertson v. State, Fla.App.1971, 245 So.2d 304; Richardson v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 530; Corbin v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 259 So.2d 543.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 74 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 74

        To provide for the simplification of health payor forms.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1993

Mr. Hoagland introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly 
      to the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To provide for the simplification of health payor forms.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health Payor Forms Simplification 
Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. HEALTH PAYOR FORMS SIMPLIFICATION.

    (a) Development of Plan and Model.--The Secretary of Health and 
Human Services shall request the National Association of Insurance 
Commissioners--
            (1) to develop, by not later than January 1, 1995--
                    (A) model forms (particularly forms used by 
                consumer and health care providers) that use commonly 
                understood terminology in submitting claims to health 
                payors, and
                    (B) a plan for simplifying and making more uniform 
                forms and procedures, health care provider invoices, 
                explanations of procedures, and electronic claims 
                submission; and
            (2) to consult, in developing such model forms and plan, 
        with representatives of consumer groups (including the 
        elderly), government agencies, health payors, health care 
        providers, business, labor, and other appropriate groups 
        affected by such forms or plan.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Health payor.--The term ``health payor'' includes for-
        profit and non-profit insurance companies, self-funded health 
        plans, health maintenance organizations, the medicare and 
        medicaid programs, and other Federal and State programs 
        providing payment for health care.
            (2) Health care providers.--The term ``health care 
        providers'' includes hospitals, physicians, and other licensed 
        providers of health care.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                                       
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements on Form S-8 (333-01574, 333-12789) and (333-12789, and 333-24581); 
Form S-3 (333-10383 and 333-14025); Form S-4 (333-13133); and Post-Effective 
Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 on Form S-8 (333-36463) of our report dated 
February 8, 1996 relating to the financial statements of The Re-Print 
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1995 which report appears in this 
Annual Report on Form 10-K of U.S. Office Products Company.



/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP                       BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
--------------------

  Atlanta, Georgia
  July 20, 1998
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906


of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Friedman Industries,
Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the
period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ben Harper, Senior Vice
President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 19, 2005

| |                  
| | -----------------
| | By /s/ BEN HARPER
| |                  
| | Name: Ben Harper 

| |        |                                                      
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------
| | Title: | Senior Vice President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 2 - 1124 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 - CE - 0 41 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
256 La. 911

#### Alexander SAS JAWORSKY v. Pierre LeBLANC.

No. 50935.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 9, 1970.

In re: Pierre LeBlanc applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 239 So.2d 176.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 800 

To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to provide financial 

institutions with credit for providing assistance during Government shutdowns. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2019 

Mr. MEEKS (for himself, Ms. NORTON, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Ms. JACKSON

LEE, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. RYAN, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Mr. VARGAS, 

Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Ms. WASSERMAN

SCHULTZ, Mr. DESAULNIER, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. SIRES, Mr. QUIGLEY, 

and Mr. PERLMUTTER) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to 

provide financial institutions with credit for providing 

assistance during Government shutdowns. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Workers 

5 Banking Assistance Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 800 IH

1 SEC. 2. CRA CREDIT FOR PROVIDING ASSISTANCE DURING 

2 GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWNS. 

3 Section 804 of the Community Reinvestment Act of 

4 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2903) is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘(e) ASSISTANCE DURING GOVERNMENT SHUT7 DOWNS.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In assessing and taking 

9 into account, under subsection (a), the record of a 

10 financial institution, the appropriate Federal finan11 cial supervisory agency shall consider, as a factor, 

12 efforts of the financial institution to modify terms 

13 on existing loans, extend new loans with low- to no14 interest rates, or the waiving of fees to help covered 

15 employees, if such modification or extension is done 

16 in a safe and sound manner. 

17 ‘‘(2) GUIDANCE.—The appropriate Federal fi18 nancial supervisory agencies shall issue guidance 

19 with respect to this subsection not later than the end 

20 of the 7-day period following— 

21 ‘‘(A) the date of enactment of this sub22 section; and 

23 ‘‘(B) any lapse in Federal appropriations. 

24 ‘‘(3) COVERED EMPLOYEE.—For purposes of 

25 this subsection, the term ‘covered employee’ 

26 means— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 800 IH

1 ‘‘(A) a Federal or District of Columbia em2 ployee furloughed or excepted from such fur3 lough during any lapse in Federal appropria4 tions; and 

5 ‘‘(B) a Federal contractor who, during any 

6 lapse in Federal appropriations, is not receiving 

7 pay by reason of such lapse.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 31(2)



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMPANY

(Section 302)

I, George M. Bachman, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Florida Public Utilities Company (the registrant);;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003

By  /s/ George M. Bachman

George M. Bachman

Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23

 

CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

As independent public accountants, we herebyconsent to the incorporation of our annual report dated February 27, 2002, forthe year ending December 31, 2001, for Gasel Transportation Lines, Inc. and itssubsidiary to be included in this Form 10-KSB, into the Company’s previouslyfiled Registration Statement on Form 10-SB (file number 0-30185.)

 
| /s/ VAN KREVEL &  COMPANY |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |
| Dublin, Ohio                  |
|                          |
| April 15, 2002                |

 

----
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 604

To extend the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to enter into

agreements with certain cities and counties for the withholding of city

and county income and employment taxes from the pay of Federal

employees who are residents of, or regularly employed in, such cities

and counties.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. KANJORSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To extend the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury

to enter into agreements with certain cities and counties

for the withholding of city and county income and employment taxes from the pay of Federal employees who

are residents of, or regularly employed in, such cities

and counties.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) paragraph (1) of section 5520(c) of title 5,

4 United States Code, is amended—

5 (1) by striking the comma at the end of sub6 paragraph (B)(iii) and inserting a period; and
2

•HR 604 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘within the political boundaries

2 of which 500 or more persons are regularly em3 ployed by all agencies of the Federal Government;’’.

4 (b) Paragraph (2) of such section is amended by

5 striking ‘‘Census and within the political boundaries of

6 which 500 or more persons are regularly employed by all

7 agencies of the Federal Government;’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘Census.’’.

Æ
#### Ronnie WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-543.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 10, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County.

Appeal dismissed.
discretion to impose consecutive sentences, see NRS 176.035(1). We 

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion at sentencing. 

Second, Gonzalez contends that the district court erred by 

granting his habeas petition without conducting an evidentiary hearing. 

Gonzalez, however, is not an aggrieved party because the district court 

granted the relief he requested—a new sentencing hearing. See generally 

NRAP 3B; NRS 177.015. Moreover, any challenge to the district court's 

ruling on Gonzalez's habeas petition is independently appealable and not 

properly raised in an appeal from the amended judgment of conviction. 

See NRS 34.575(1). 1Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to consider this claim. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the amended judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

Parraguirre 

Saitta 

'As the State points out in its fast track response, it appears that 

the district court has not yet entered and filed a formal, written order 

granting Gonzalez's habeas petition. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A cera 
cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge 

Potter Law Offices 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                230
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       6,847
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                         3,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   10,842
<PP&E>                                             41,554
<DEPRECIATION>                                     25,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     28,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,950,814
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                            49
<COMMON>                                            9,718
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,281,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       28,395
<SALES>                                            26,314
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   40,651
<CGS>                                               2,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     124,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  175,494
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 64,742
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (324,151)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (324,151)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (324,151)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.034)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.034)


</TABLE>
vistom cEnren

LasikPlus:5

“Great News” (:30) - $250 Promo only

ANNCR (:25):

What if we told you there’s a quick, easy way to get rid of the daily hassles of contacts and glasses? And
even better... what if it could cost as low as Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars?

Well, it’s all true...all thanks to LASIKPLUS.

Now... LASIKPLUS can help fix your vision for only Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars... our lowest price ever!

Click or call 800-841-2020 to schedule your FREE LASIK exam.

DISCLAIMER (:05):

Results may vary. Restrictions apply. See details at LasikPlusPandora.com

FOIA Confidential LCAV00073279
| (Date      of report)                  | April      29, 2009 |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------|
| (Date      of earliest event reported) | April      29, 2009 |

| Delaware                          |   | 1-12202           |   | 93-1120873               |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-------------------|--------|--------------------------|
| (State      or other jurisdiction |   | (Commission       |   | (IRS      Employer       |
| of      incorporation)            |   | File      Number) |   | Identification      No.) |

----

| Item 2.02 |   | Results of Operations and Financial      Condition                                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|      |   |  On      April 29, 2009, we announced our results of operations for the quarter      ended March 31, 2009.  The news release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1      and incorporated by reference herein.  |
| Item 9.01 |   | Financial Statements and      Exhibits                                                                                                                                                                               |
|      |   |  Exhibits                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|      |   | 99.1   News      release issued by ONEOK Partners, L. P. dated April 29,    2009.                                                                                                                     |
|      |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |

----

|   |                |   | ONEOK      Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK      Partners GP, L.L.C., General Partner |
|--------|---------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                |   |                                                                                    |
| Date:  | April      29, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Curtis L. Dinan                                                                     |
|   |                |   | Executive      Vice President -Chief      Financial Officer andTreasurer           |

----
Exhibit 32.02








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Benihana Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 27, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gene R. Baldwin, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Gene R. BaldwinGene R. BaldwinInterim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 27, 2012, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules of Colonial Properties Trust and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to a change in the presentation of comprehensive income (loss) due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2011-05) and the effectiveness of Colonial Properties Trust's internal control over financial reporting, incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Colonial Properties Trust for the year ended December 31, 2011, and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement .





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





Birmingham, Alabama


April 9, 2012