alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4363-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2018-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Indiana (FEMA-4363-DR), dated May 4, 2018, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued June 5, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Indiana is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 4, 2018.

Pulaski County for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2018-13094 Filed 6-18-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Richard OLIVEAUX.

No. 54268.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 25, 1974.

In re: Richard Oliveaux, applying for Remedial Writs and Stay Order.

Writ denied. The application is without merit.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion the conviction for second offense, D.W.I. is illegal when based on a conviction where the defendant was not afforded counsel and did not waive counsel.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 616

AN ACT

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to

ment discretion.counts for which such members exercise investto effect certain transactions with respect to acpermit members of national securities exchanges
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 616

AN ACT

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to permit

members of national securities exchanges to effect certain

transactions with respect to accounts for which such

members exercise investment discretion.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS.

4 Section 11(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of

5 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78k(a)(1)) is amended—

6 (1) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘(other

7 than an investment company)’’;
2

•HR 616 EH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara2 graph (G);

3 (3) by redesignating subparagraph (H) as sub4 paragraph (I); and

5 (4) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the fol6 lowing new subparagraph:

7 ‘‘(H) any transaction for an account with re8 spect to which such member or an associated person

9 thereof exercises investment discretion if such mem10 ber—

11 ‘‘(i) has obtained, from the person or per12 sons authorized to transact business for the ac13 count, express authorization for such member

14 or associated person to effect such transactions

15 prior to engaging in the practice of effecting

16 such transactions;

17 ‘‘(ii) furnishes the person or persons au18 thorized to transact business for the account

19 with a statement at least annually disclosing

20 the aggregate compensation received by the ex21 change member in effecting such transactions;

22 and
3

•HR 616 EH

1 ‘‘(iii) complies with any rules the Commis2 sion has prescribed with respect to the require3 ments of clauses (i) and (ii); and’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMPANY

(Section 302)

I, John T. English, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Florida Public Utilities Company (the registrant);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 14, 2007



By  /s/ John T. English

John T. English

Chief Executive Officer
#### Robert N. Anderson, Doing Business as Woodcrest Manor Home for Adults, Appellant, v Dennis B. Schlenker et al., Defendants. Curtis & Riess-Curtis, P. C., Nonparty Respondent.

[722 NYS2d 169]

—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (LaCava, J.), entered January 20, 2000, which, upon an order of the same court, dated October 15, 1999, granting the motion of the nonparty Curtis & Riess-Curtis, P. C., for leave to withdraw as his counsel and for enforcement of its retaining lien, is in favor of the nonparty and against him in the principal sum of $49,659.46.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the plaintiff’s notice of appeal from the order dated October 15, 1999, is deemed to *576be a premature notice of appeal from the judgment *(see,*CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent.

Curtis & Riess-Curtis, P. C. (hereinafter Curtis), proffered sufficient evidence to establish the outstanding debt owed to it by the plaintiff. Further, when brought to the plaintiff’s attention, the plaintiff acknowledged the debt and praised the legal work of Curtis. Thus, the Supreme Court properly allowed Curtis to withdraw as counsel and enforce its retaining lien when the plaintiff refused to pay the outstanding debt *(see, Galvano v Galvano,*193 AD2d 779; *Jim-Mar Corp. v Aquatic Constr.,*195 AD2d 868; *Cohen v Cohen,*183 AD2d 802).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from SEC Form 10-Q
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         108,617
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,914
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                49,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    201,899
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         487,521
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           498,448
<LOANS>                                      2,080,864
<ALLOWANCE>                                     25,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,027,736
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,628,009
<SHORT-TERM>                                   125,239
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             29,209
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,575
<COMMON>                                        18,187
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     220,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,027,736
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                143,550
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               32,098
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,502
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               177,150
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              80,078
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              84,965
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           92,185
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,614
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  36
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 73,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,871
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      26,042
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,042
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.78
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,862
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,494
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   732
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,110
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                25,203
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,803
<RECOVERIES>                                       561
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               25,947
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            25,947
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1208

HENRY LEWIS ASTROP,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ANITA NEWTON,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., 

District Judge. (3:16-cv-00036-JAG)

Submitted: August 4, 2016 Decided: August 9, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KING, Circuit Judge, and DAVIS, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Lewis Astrop, Appellant Pro Se. Anita Newton, 

Lawrenceville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Henry Lewis Astrop seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for lack 

of subject matter jurisdiction. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. 

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Astrop seeks 

to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Central Va. 

Legal Aid, 807 F.3d 619 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and remand the case 

to the district court with instructions to allow Astrop to file 

an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
#### Claire Felice KASSER, Appellant, v. Norman J. KASSER, Appellee.

No. 77-184.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 24, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 27, 1978.

Quinton, Leib & Lummus and Karl J. Leib, Jr., and James D. Adams, Miami, for appellant.

Bartel, Levine & Shuford and Paul J. Levine, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Shaw v. Shaw,*334 So.2d 13, 16 (Fla.1976); *Koeppel v. Koeppel,*351 So.2d 766 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); *Pfohl v. Pfohl,*345 So.2d 371, 375 (Fla.3d DCA 1977).
#### Homer WARD, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee.

No. 46440.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 18, 1971.

Travis Buckley, Laurel, for defendant-appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by John M. Kinard, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

*665PATTERSON, Justice.

This appeal arises from the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial District of Jones County. Homer Ward was indicted for, convicted of and sentenced to a term in the penitentiary for intentionally pointing a shot gun at Beulah McLaurin Evans and feloniously discharging the same to her injury in violation of Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated section 2013 (1956), Assault and Battery — Pointing, aiming a gun.

The essence of the charge by the terms of the statute is the intentional pointing or aiming of the gun. Barnes v. State, Miss., 249 So.2d 383, decided June 7, 1971; and Thomas v. State, 217 So.2d 287 (Miss. 1969). Evidence of an intentional pointing or aiming is necessary to sustain a conviction under the statute.

A review of the record discloses that the State’s primary witness, the victim of the shooting, was totally unable to identify the person who shot her, the sum of her testimony being, “I don’t know who shot me. I told you that.”

The remainder of the State’s evidence consists of a confession by the defendant which was related to the jury by Deputy Sheriff Lowe. It is as follows:

> Homer Ward told us that him and Alvin Barnett and Charles Moffett were taking Beulah McLaurin home and they turned off on a dirt road and went approximately one mile or so and stopped the car and the question arose that they wanted sexual intercourse with Beulah McLaurin and at this time she did not want to have sexual intercourse with Homer Ward. They got out of the car and there were some words passed and Alvin Barnett was having sexual intercourse with Beulah McLaurin and Homer Ward taken the shotgun from under the front seat of the car and two shells from the dash and while Alvin was having intercourse with Beulah, Homer hit Alvin on the side of the head with the shotgun and cocked the gun and went to lay it down and the gun went off and he saw that Beulah was shot and put the gun back in the car and went up the road.

We are unable to glean from the proof offered by the State any evidence whatsoever that the defendant intentionally pointed or aimed the gun at Beulah Mc-Laurin Evans. It is our opinion, therefore, that the trial court erred when it did not sustain the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the State’s evidence.

Reversed and the defendant is hereby discharged.

ETHRIDGE, C. J., and INZER, SMITH and ROBERTSON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1
  Section
1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  I, Sandy
Weil, President and Chief Executive Officer of Proginet Corporation (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
  1.
              The
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended July 31,
      2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:
October 2, 2008
 
 
 /s/Sandy
      WeilSandy
      WeilPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
  
 This
certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject of the liability
of that Section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act except as otherwise stated in such filing.  A signed
original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Proginet Corporation and will be retained by Proginet Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00835-CR

Ex parte Bo Dresner

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

NO. CR-19-0800-B, THE HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Bo Dresner has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, which is signed by 

both appellant and his attorney. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). We grant the motion and dismiss 

the appeal. See id.

__________________________________________

Edward Smith, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Smith

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: October 6, 2020

Do Not Publish
Christine Weber

626 Route 28

Kingston, NY 12401

Petition for exemption | rulemaking

 I have a Virtual Tour business that many Real Estate agents throughout the county call upon

for their virtual photography as well as indoor photography and Aerial photography. My 

company’s name is Hudson Valley Tours & More, we service Ulster County and will go out as 

far as Dutchess, Columbia and Greene Counties. We are seeking exemption because we would 

like to include Aerial Photography | Videos in our business to increase our photography services 

that we offer. We will not fly above 200-300 ft depending on the surrounding properties. If there 

is property in close proximity we will fly the lowest possible to get the Aerial shots. I do not and 

will not fly over any government properties as well as reservoirs. I would love to provide this 

service as part of my Real Estate and Business Virtual Tours.
#### Fred Kevin O’BRIEN, M. D., Taufick E. Bendeck, M. D., Appellant, v. Margaret F. PLIKAITIS, as the widow of Peter A. Plikaitis, Jr., and as the personal representative of the Estate of Peter A. Plikaitis, Jr., and Claire Plikaitis, Margaret Plikaitis and Peter Plikaitis, as the natural minor children of Peter A. Plikaitis, Jr., deceased, and Palm Beach Gardens Community Hospital, Inc., Appellees.

Nos. 77-2641, 77-2617.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 26, 1978.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

ORDERED that the Motion for Dismissal filed January 4.1978 is hereby granted, and the above styled case is hereby dismissed as to Case No. 77-2641; and further

ORDERED that this Appeal shall proceed only as to Case No. 77-2617.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8195 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient 

clinic, located at 400 College Drive, Middleburg, Florida, the ‘‘A.K. 

Baker VA Clinic’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 

Mr. YOHO (for himself, Mr. CRIST, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, 

Mr. BUCHANAN, Mrs. DEMINGS, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. 

DUNN, Ms. FRANKEL, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. MAST, Mr. 

LAWSON of Florida, Mr. POSEY, Ms. MUCARSEL-POWELL, Mr. ROONEY

of Florida, Mrs. MURPHY of Florida, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Ms. SHALALA, 

Mr. SPANO, Mr. SOTO, Mr. STEUBE, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. 

WALTZ, Ms. WILSON of Florida, and Mr. WEBSTER of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs communitybased outpatient clinic, located at 400 College Drive, 

Middleburg, Florida, the ‘‘A.K. Baker VA Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8195 IH

1 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 COMMUNITY-BASED OUTPATIENT CLINIC LO3 CATED AT 400 COLLEGE DRIVE, MIDDLE4 BURG, FLORIDA. 

5 The Department of Veterans Affairs community6 based outpatient clinic, located at 400 College Drive, Mid7 dleburg, Florida, shall after the date of the enactment of 

8 this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘A.K. Baker VA 

9 Clinic’’. Any reference to such community-based out10 patient clinic in any law, regulation, map, document, 

11 record, or other paper of the United States shall be consid12 ered to be a reference to the A.K. Baker VA Clinic. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS