alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6990

BENJAMIN EARL COX, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DANIEL L. STIENEKE; MACK JARVIS; DAVID CHESTER, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-98-267-5-F) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin Earl Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Benjamin Earl Cox filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on May 11, 1998; Cox’s notice of appeal was filed on June 29, 1998, which is beyond the thirty-day appeal period. His failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Cox’s appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Amtsblatt C 192A/31.

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 192A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 59. Jahrgang31. Mai 2016 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 192A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

59. Jahrgang31. Mai 2016

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Bekanntmachungen |
| | VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN |
| | Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO) |
| 2016/C 192A/1 | Reserveliste — EPSO/AD/296/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in deutschem Recht (DE) — Beamte der Funktionsgruppe Administration (AD 5/AD 7) mit Schwerpunkt „Juristische Recherche“ | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

V   Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO)

2016/C 192A/1

Reserveliste — EPSO/AD/296/15 — Juristen mit Ausbildung in deutschem Recht (DE) — Beamte der Funktionsgruppe Administration (AD 5/AD 7) mit Schwerpunkt „Juristische Recherche“

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)January 28, 2016(Date of earliest event reported)January 27, 2016





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---




Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn January 27, 2016, ONEOK, Inc. (ONEOK) and ONEOK Partners, L.P. (ONEOK Partners) announced they will release their fourth-quarter and year end 2015 earnings after the market closes on February 22, 2016, and will hold a joint conference call and live webcast at 11 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (10 a.m. Central Standard Time) on February 23, 2016.  The call will also be carried live on the ONEOK and ONEOK Partners websites.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)ExhibitsExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated January 27, 2016.





2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:January 28, 2016By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer





3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated January 27, 2016.








4
#### GUERDON INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, d/b/a Armor Mobile Home Manufacturing Corporation of Georgia, Petitioner, v. Laura H. DURRENBERGER, Respondent.

No. JJ-369.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 16, 1978.

*911Jerry W. Gerde, Panama City, for petitioner.

Bill A. Corbin, Blountstown, for respondent.

BOOTH, Judge.

This cause is before the Court on Petition for Writ of Certiorari to review the order of the Circuit Court, Washington County, which order is in pertinent part, as follows:

> “THIS CAUSE having come on before the Court for Hearing, upon Defendant’s Motion To Strike Affidavit, and Motion For Summary Judgment; and the Court having considered the matter, and having heard argument from counsel for both parties; and finding that a Motion For Summary Judgment is a pleading, and that the Pre-Trial Order forbids the filing of any further pleading without order of the Court; it is therefore

> * * * * * *

> ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment be, and it is hereby, denied, upon the aforesaid basis that it is a pleading and therefore proscribed by the provisions of the Pre-Trial Order . .”

On consideration of the Petition and Appendix and Response thereto we hold that the Petition has merit and that the foregoing order of the trial court refusing to consider a motion for summary judgment on the grounds stated violates essential requirements of law. A motion for summary judgment is not a “pleading.” See Rules 1.100 and 1.110, F.R.C.P.; *Metcalf*v. *Langston,*296 So.2d 81 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), cert. denied 302 So.2d 414 (Fla.1975). Further, the trial court may not prohibit or deny consideration of the motion if timely and otherwise proper under Rule 1.510, F.R.C.P.

Accordingly, the order denying summary judgment is VACATED and the cause REMANDED for consideration of the motion on its merits.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and SMITH, J., concur.
Exhibit 10.94

EXTENSION AGREEMENT

Bank
of America, N.A.,
    as Administrative Agent
Attn: Suzanne Paul
231 South LaSalle Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

The
undersigned hereby agrees to extend, effective April 3, 2002, its Commitment and the Maturity Date under the Credit Agreement dated as of April 3, 2001 among
SOURCECORP, Incorporated, f/k/a F.Y.I. Incorporated, each of the Lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and
sole book agent (as the same may be amended or otherwise modified from time to time, the "Credit Agreement") for 364 days to April 2, 2005
pursuant toSection 2.1(d)of the Credit Agreement. Terms defined in the Credit Agreement are used herein as therein defined.

This
Extension Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the law of the State of Texas. The Extension Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument.

| |  | WELLS FARGO BANK TEXAS, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION
| |  | --------------------------------------------
| |  | Name:                                       
| |  |                                             
| |  |                                             

|Agreed and Accepted:                               
|---------------------------------------------------
|SOURCECORP, INCORPORATED, f/k/a
F.Y.I. INCORPORATED
|By:                                                
|Name:                                              
|Title:                                             
|BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Administrative Agent     
|By:                                                
|Name:                                              
|Title:                                             

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 11.1



Computation of Earnings Per Share



The following formula was used to calculate the earnings per share, Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2005 and 2004, included in this report as Exhibit 13.3.



Earnings Per
Share



Net Income / Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for
the period



|                                    |  |                             |           |      |   |          
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | --------- | ---- | - | ---------
|                                    |  | Three months ended June 30,
|                                    |  | 2005                        |           | 2004
|Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  |                             | 1,528,443 |      |   | 1,528,443
|                                    |  |                            
|Net Income                          |  | $                           | 510,783   |      | $ | 625,579  
|                                    |  |                            
|Per Share Amount                    |  | $                           | 0.33      |      | $ | 0.41     



|                                    |  |                           |           |      |   |          
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | --------- | ---- | - | ---------
|                                    |  | Six months ended June 30,
|                                    |  | 2005                      |           | 2004
|Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  |                           | 1,528,443 |      |   | 1,528,443
|                                    |  |                          
|Net Income                          |  | $                         | 1,056,512 |      | $ | 1,284,319
|                                    |  |                          
|Per Share Amount                    |  | $                         | 0.69      |      | $ | 0.84     



No common stock equivalents exist.





32
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906


of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Friedman Industries,
Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, William E. Crow,
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 14, 2006



| |                       
| | ----------------------
| | By /s/ William E. Crow
| |                       
| | Name: William E. Crow 

| |        |                                                               
| | ------ | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer
261 La. 1054

#### JEFFERSON PARISH SCHOOL BOARD v. MARRERO LAND AND IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, LTD.

No. 52395.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 23, 1972.

In re: Marrero Land and Improvement Association, Ltd. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 258 So.2d 585.

Writ denied. Under the facts, we find no error of law.
#### Harley JORDAN v. STATE ATTORNEY OFFICER, et al. of HAMILTON COUNTY, JASPER, Florida.

No. 38741.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") by Azzurra Holding Corporation ("Registrant"), and the undersigned hereby certifies that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the Report.








Date: March 19, 2010
By:
/s/  Daniel W. RumseyDaniel W. Rumsey
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to Azzurra Holding Corporation and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 596

To authorize civil actions for certain violations involving depository

institutions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. KANJORSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To authorize civil actions for certain violations involving

depository institutions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Savings and Loan

5 Asset Recovery Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. CIVIL ACTIONS FOR CERTAIN VIOLATIONS INVOLV7 ING DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS.

8 (a) Section 951 of the Financial Institutions Reform,

9 Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C.

10 1833a) is amended by adding at the end the following:
2

HR 596 IH

1 ‘‘(g) CIVIL ACTIONS FOR CERTAIN VIOLATIONS.—A

2 person may bring a civil action to assess a civil penalty

3 for a violation referred to in subsection (c) in the same

4 manner and subject to the same procedures as a person

5 may bring an action under section 3730 of title 31, United

6 States Code, for a violation of section 3729 of such title.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 786 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 786

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the exclusion 
               from gross income for veterans' benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1993

  Mr. Montgomery (for himself, Mr. Stump, Mr. Evans, Mr. Rowland, Mr. 
  Slattery, Mr. Sangmeister, and Mr. Bishop) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the exclusion 
               from gross income for veterans' benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF VETERANS' BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 134(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to qualified military benefit) is 
amended by adding at the end thereof the following new flush sentence:
        ``For purposes of this paragraph and notwithstanding paragraph 
        (3), the term `qualified military benefit' includes any 
        allowance or benefit administered by the Secretary of Veterans 
        Affairs.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1984.

                                 <all>
```
#### Sigmund PREISNER, Appellant, v. Kenneth D. CROPF and Arthur F. List, Individually and Jointly, Appellees.

No. 72-456.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 29, 1973.

Harold Shapiro, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Merle Litman, of Litman & Muchnick, Hollywood, for appellees.

OWEN, Judge.

Appellant, alleging fraud, sought restitution of the money which he had paid in part performance of his agreement to purchase a one-third interest in appellees’ business. The case was tried nonjury, and at the close of the plaintiff’s case, the court granted the defendants’ motion for involuntary dismissal and subsequently entered final judgment in favor of defendants.

The plaintiff’s evidence, viewed most favorably to him, established a prima facie case of fraud. It is apparent that the trial court, in considering the defendants’ motion for an involuntary dismissal, undertook to weigh the evidence as the trier of the facts and that it was upon such basis that he determined that the motion should be granted. This he may not do. Tillman v. Baskin, Fla.1972, 260 So.2d 509.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

REED, C. J., and MAGER, J., concur.
#### Willie Earl BIVINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-333.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 17, 1969.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, Edwin I. Ford, Asst. Public Defender, Clear-water, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

*923PER CURIAM.

Defendant maintains that he should have been given an evidentiary hearing on his motion for relief to determine whether or not he had had the “proper aid of counsel.”

The record shows otherwise and for that reason we affirm the trial court’s order.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.
#### Myrie A. JOHNSON et al., Appellants, v. Essie Mae HERRING, Appellee.

No. 72-1134.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 30, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Knott, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report
of Downey Financial Corp. ("Downey") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marangal I. Domingo, Chief Executive Officer of
Downey, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

> (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
> 1934; and

> (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
> results of operations of Downey.



| | /s/  Marangal I. Domingo             
| | -------------------------------------
| |                                      
| | Date: March 5, 2004                  
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
|

| |  | Navigation Links
| |  | ----------------

Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report
of Downey Financial Corp. ("Downey") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tom E. Prince, Chief Financial Officer of
Downey, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

> (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
> 1934; and

> (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
> results of operations of Downey.



| | /s/  Tom E. Prince     
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Date: March 5, 2004    
| | Cheif Financial Officer
|

| |  | Navigation Links
| |  | ----------------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Honorable David S. Small, Secretary Delaware Department ofNatural Resources and Environmental Control 89 Kings Highway Dover, Delaware 19901 Dear Secretary Small: 

### JUN 3D ZD15

OnMay 1, 2015, EPA received a revision to the Delaware State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Delaware Department ofNaturalResources and Environmental Control (DE DNREC). That revision, dated April23, 2015, is entitled "Delaware 2011 Base Yeas State Implementation Plan (SIP) Emissions Inventory under the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)." EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notice (DFRN) action. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct themto Maria A. Pino, Office of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2181, or at pino.maria@epa.gov
. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Sincerely

# J)\M'()_~ DianaEsher, Director Air Protection Division



# 0 Printedon 100% recycled/recyclablepaper witlr 100%post-consumer fiber andprocess chlorine free. Customer ServiceHotline: 1-800-438-2474