alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31(a)****CERTIFICATION**I, John C. Harris, President and Chief Executive Officer of Viseon, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Viseon, Inc.; 2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls.**Date: September 30, 2005**/s/ John C. HarrisJohn C. Harris President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### John C. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-266.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 6, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 74

To provide for the simplification of health payor forms.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. HOAGLAND introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the

Committees on Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide for the simplification of health payor forms.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Payor Forms

5 Simplification Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. HEALTH PAYOR FORMS SIMPLIFICATION.

7 (a) DEVELOPMENT OF PLAN AND MODEL.—The Sec8 retary of Health and Human Services shall request the

9 National Association of Insurance Commissioners—

10 (1) to develop, by not later than January 1,

11 1995—
2

•HR 74 IH

1 (A) model forms (particularly forms used

2 by consumer and health care providers) that

3 use commonly understood terminology in sub4 mitting claims to health payors, and

5 (B) a plan for simplifying and making

6 more uniform forms and procedures, health

7 care provider invoices, explanations of proce8 dures, and electronic claims submission; and

9 (2) to consult, in developing such model forms

10 and plan, with representatives of consumer groups

11 (including the elderly), government agencies, health

12 payors, health care providers, business, labor, and

13 other appropriate groups affected by such forms or

14 plan.

15 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:

16 (1) HEALTH PAYOR.—The term ‘‘health payor’’

17 includes for-profit and non-profit insurance compa18 nies, self-funded health plans, health maintenance

19 organizations, the medicare and medicaid programs,

20 and other Federal and State programs providing

21 payment for health care.

22 (2) HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS.—The term

23 ‘‘health care providers’’ includes hospitals, physi24 cians, and other licensed providers of health care.

Æ
**Exhibit 31.2**I, Ben Harper, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Friedman Industries, Incorporated;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) [intentionally omitted per SEC release 33-8238]          c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated:February 14, 2007     /s/ BEN HARPER  Senior Vice President-Finance and  Secretary / Treasurer
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification of
Chief Executive Officer
of Delhaize America, Inc.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form10-Q (the Form 10-Q)
for the quarter ended September 28, 2002 of Delhaize America, Inc. (the
Issuer).

I, Pierre-Olivier Beckers, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify
that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i)  |  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | ---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.       

Dated: November 12, 2002

| |                           
| | --------------------------
| | /s/ Pierre-Olivier Beckers
| |                           
| | Pierre-Olivier Beckers    
| | Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 92-4947

______________________________

PATRICK BREAUX,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(91-CV-184)

______________________

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

(January 5, 1994)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DeMOSS, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After the district court remanded this case to the ALJ for

further findings, it denied Breaux's application for attorneys fees

under the Equal Access to Justice Act. This court affirmed in an

unpublished opinion, finding the case controlled by Bertrand v.

Sullivan, 976 F.2d 977, 979-80 (5th Cir. 1992). Breaux v.

Secretary, No. 92-4947, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 12009 (5th Cir. May 6,

1993) (per curiam). The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for

further proceedings in light of its later decision in Shalala v.

Schaefer, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (1993). Breaux v. Shalala, 114 S.Ct. 297
(1993).

Shalala v. Schaefer holds that a party who obtains a remand

pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) qualifies as

a prevailing party for purposes of attorneys fees under the EAJA.

113 S.Ct. at 2631-32. Schaefer overruled Part IV of Bertrand v.

Sullivan, 976 F.2d at 979-80, which stated that a fee application

by a plaintiff who has obtained a remand order should be denied "as

premature and without prejudice."

The district court's denial of Breaux's application is

REVERSED and REMANDED to allow the district court to award

reasonable attorney fees.
United States of America

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

September 18, 2014

Amanda Wait, Esq.

Hunton & Williams LLP

2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20037

Re: In the Matter of Service Corporation International and Stewart Enterprises, Inc., 

Docket No. C-4423.

Dear Ms. Wait:

This is in reference to the Petition For Approval of Proposed Divestiture filed by Service 

Corporation International (“SCI”) and received on March 7, 2014, and the Petition For Approval 

of Proposed Divestiture filed by SCI and received on July 3, 2014 (collectively the “Petitions”). 

Pursuant to the Decision and Order in Docket No. C-4423, SCI requests prior Commission approval of its proposals to divest certain assets to Hunsaker Partners LLC.

After consideration of SCI’s Petitions and other available information, the Commission 

has determined to approve the proposed divestitures as set forth in the Petitions. In according its 

approval, the Commission has relied upon the information submitted and the representations 

made by SCI and Hunsaker Partners LLC in connection with SCI’s Petitions and has assumed 

them to be accurate and complete.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

cc: Paul Houston
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 28663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13223]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Registration

ACTION: Notice of registration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Registrants listed below have applied for and been granted 
registration by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as bulk 
manufacturers of various classes of schedule I and II controlled 
substances.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The companies listed below applied to be 
registered as bulk manufacturers of various basic classes of controlled 
substances. Information on previously published notices is listed in 
the table below. No comments or objections were submitted for these 
notices.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Company                  FR Docket          Published
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMRI Rensselaer, Inc..............      83 FR 5808  February 9, 2018.
Stepan Company....................      83 FR 9029  March 2, 2018.
Research Triangle Institute.......     83 FR 10523  March 9, 2018.
Rhodes Technologies...............     83 FR 12407  March 21, 2018.
Synthcon, LLC.....................     83 FR 13141  March 27, 2018.
National Center for Natural            83 FR 13522  March 29, 2018.
 Products--Research NIDA MPROJECT.
Insys Manufacturing LLC...........     83 FR 13522  March 29, 2018.
Navinta LLC.......................     83 FR 13521  March 29, 2018.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of these registrants to manufacture 
the applicable basic classes of controlled substances is consistent 
with the public interest and with United States obligations under 
international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 
1971. The DEA investigated each of the company's maintenance of 
effective controls against diversion by inspecting and testing each 
company's physical security systems, verifying each company's 
compliance with state and local laws, and reviewing each company's 
background and history.
    Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 
CFR 1301.33, the DEA has granted a registration as a bulk manufacturer 
to the above listed companies.

    Dated: June 12, 2018.
John J. Martin,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-13223 Filed 6-19-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification of
Chief Executive Officer
of Delhaize America, Inc.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q)
for the quarter ended March 29, 2003 of Delhaize America, Inc. (the Issuer).

I, Pierre-Olivier Beckers, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer certify
that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i)  |  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
or 78o(d)); and
| | ---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Issuer.       

|                    |  |  |  |                                                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 13, 2003 |  |  |  |                                                        
|                   
|                    |  |  |  | /s/ Pierre-Olivier Beckers
Name: Pierre-Olivier Beckers

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE ISSUER AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE ISSUER AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Exhibit 99.2The following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of General Binding Corporation on the basis of such officer's knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Binding Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 12, 2002, (the "Report"), I, Don Civgin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

By:
/s/ Don Civgin                           
     Don Civgin 
          Senior Vice President and Chief     Financial Officer
 
     August 13, 2002
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 2, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1239

Lower Tribunal Nos. F17-7614, F18-19978, 

 F18-19979, F18-20094

________________

Clarence Fields,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge.

Clarence Fields, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LINDSEY, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Willie Sam ANDERSON and Robert Singleton, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. Q-447.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 15, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Additional TSD's 

 Bill Maxwell 

 to: Cortney_Higgins 

 03/04/2011 05:18 PM 

 Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Jeb Stenhouse 

Cortney -- 

Here are some additional TSDs. 

Thanks. 

Section 5.3 Coal to Gas Retrofit v3.docx New documentation on coal-to-gas switching. 

TSD_Coal-to-Gas Conversions_to OMB 03-04-11.doc TSD on fuel switching. 

Planned and Projected Retirements.xlsx List of unit retirements (a) before the 

base case is modeled, (b) modeled in the base case, and (c) modeled in 

the policy case. Note that we had previously listed 20 GW of planned 

retirements; this was a copy error. The actual planned retirement 

capacity is 11.4 GW. This issue does not affect any regulatory 

materials already in interagency review (it was implemented correctly 

in the modeling). 3 GW of this retiring capacity is based on 

information available in EIA Form 860 (2009). The remaining planned 

retirements were identified through external sources and verified by 

EPA using proprietary and publically available information. "2015 

Base Retirements" and "2015 ToxR Retirements" identify all units 

projected to close in the IPM 2015 base case and Proposed Toxics Rule 

case, respectively. 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 734 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 734

  To amend the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the extension of 
certain Federal benefits, services, and assistance to the Pascua Yaqui 
             Indians of Arizona, and for other purposes.''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1993

    Mr. Pastor (for himself, Mr. Kolbe, and Ms. English of Arizona) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the extension of 
certain Federal benefits, services, and assistance to the Pascua Yaqui 
             Indians of Arizona, and for other purposes.''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOVEREIGNTY OF PASCUA YAQUI TRIBE.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act 
entitled ``An Act to provide for the extension of certain Federal 
benefits, services, and assistance to the Pascua Yaqui Indians of 
Arizona, and for other purposes'' (25 U.S.C. 1300f(a)) is amended by 
inserting after the first sentence the following: ``The Pascua Yaqui 
Tribe, a historic Indian tribe, is acknowledged as a federally 
recognized Indian tribe possessing all the attributes of inherent 
sovereignty which have not been specifically taken away by Acts of 
Congress and which are not inconsistent with such tribal status.''.
    (b) Extension of Enrollment Deadline.--Section 3 of such Act (25 
U.S.C. 1300f-2) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (B) by striking ``and''; and
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (C) as paragraph (D) and 
        inserting after paragraph (B) the following new paragraph (C):
            ``(C) all those persons of Yaqui blood who are citizens of 
        the United States and who, within three years after the date of 
        enactment of this paragraph, apply for enrollment in the Pascua 
        Yaqui Tribe pursuant to the membership criteria and procedures 
        provided for in the official governing documents of the Pascua 
        Yaqui Tribe; and''.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Damien
      R. Tanaka, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Aduromed
      Industries, Inc., (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the three month period ended
      June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
      or
      15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      August 14, 2008








/s/
      Damien R. Tanaka





Damien
      R.
      Tanaka


President
      and Chief Executive Officer