alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1








January 31, 2013Analyst Contact:T.D. Eureste918-588-7167Media Contact:Brad Borror918-588-7582








ONEOK Partners to Participate in


Credit Suisse Energy Summit





TULSA, Okla. –  Jan. 31, 2013 -- ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will participate in the Credit Suisse Energy Summit in Vail, Colo., on Feb. 5-6, 2013.





Pierce H. Norton II, ONEOK Partners executive vice president, commercial, will conduct a series of one-on-one meetings with investment-community representatives at the conference.





The materials utilized at the conference will be accessible on the ONEOK Partners website, www.oneokpartners.com , on Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2013, beginning at 6 a.m. Mountain Standard Time (7 a.m. Central Standard Time).








ONEOK Partners, L.P. (pronounced ONE-OAK) (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation's premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy company, which owns 43.4 percent of the overall partnership interest. ONEOK is one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S.





For more information, visit the website at www.oneokpartners.com .





For the latest news about ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKPartners .





###
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6124

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JERRY ELMO HARTSOE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior

District Judge. (3:13-cr-00479-CMC-1; 3:15-cv-02024-CMC)

Submitted: May 26, 2016 Decided: June 1, 2016

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit 

Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeremy A. Thompson, LAW OFFICE OF JEREMY A. THOMPSON, LLC, 

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Tommie DeWayne 

Pearson, John C. Potterfield, Anne Hunter Young, Assistant 

United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Elmo Hartsoe seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Hartsoe has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32

Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

This certification is given by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cascade Bancorp (the registrant) pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, with respect to the registrants annual report of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), that:

1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Patricia L. MossPatricia L. Moss
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Gregory D. NewtonGregory D. Newton
Executive Vice President and
Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  2/25/05
#### Witham DUFOUR, Sidney A. Rovira, et al. v. Houston L. WOOD, Jr., et al.

No. 60159.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1977.

In re: Houston L. Wood, Jr., et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 346 So.2d 863.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the court of appeal, the result is correct.
#### Ex parte Edward Cleo BROWN.

77-305.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 24, 1978.

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER, AL-MON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit        32.1**

**Certification        of CEO and CFO Pursuant to**

**18        U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as        Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                  Michael P.                  Frawley                                                                                                                                                                                                 |   |   |   |
| Name:  Michael                    P. FrawleyTitle:                        Chief                    Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate:    August                    8, 2006   |        |

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Donald P. Lofe,Jr., Chief Financial Officer of The PMI Group, Inc. (“Company”), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: March 15, 2011 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### E. Gene RICH, Planning and Zoning Director of Orange County, Florida, Appellant, v. Millard P. COMSTOCK et al., Appellees.

No. 71-716.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 8, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Roger A. Barker, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Paul C. WASHBURN, Appellant, v. VAN DYKE MACHINE TOOL, INC., etc., Appellee.

No. 72-833.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 9, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
jetBlue.

27-01 Queens Plaza North

Long Island City. NY 11101

jetblue.com

July 23, 2013

Brooke Chapman

Associate Director

Small Community Air Service Development

Office of Aviation Analysis

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Room W86-307

202-366-0577

Dear Ms. Chapman:

. .# .... t'" 'l,',).'r'TI'I.:NT _,,~~ ,l. OCI

::sSPORTATION :::U OPERi,TIOi,S

ZCIJ SCP I b ;.:> 12: 58

On behalf of the 15,000 Crewmembers of JetBlue Airways, I am writing to express JetBlue's interest in

adding air service to Savannah (SAV) from Boston (BOS). JetBlue is currently considering non-stop

service to Savannah from Boston's Logan airport, with the potential to begin service as early as Spring of

2014. Additionally, JetBlue is interested in establishing direct service to Savannah from New York City's

John F. Kennedy airport as well.

I am confident that the market dynamics of Savannah will fit well with JetBJue's high quality, low fare air

service and will drive significant increases in travel to Georgia's Southeast coast. In recent years, JetBlue

has been able to enter markets and reduce fares while simultaneously increasing demand. After letBlue

established service from New York City (JFK) to Jacksonville FL (lAX) in June 2006, average fares

dropped by 22% while daily passenger demand rose 43%. More recently, JetBlue has been very satisfied

with the new direct service to Charleston, SC (CHS), which began in February 2013. It has already

experienced the "JetBlue effect" of lowering fares while increasing demand. Our analysis indicates that

Savannah holds similar new-market potential as Jacksonville and Charleston. I believe JetBlue can lower

fares and increase demand on Savannah routes to Boston and New York, and I ask for your support in

communicating JetBlue's interest in Savannah to your Board.

I greatly appreciate your attention to this important subject. Thank you for your assistance and

consideration.

Respectfull y,

Scott Laurence

Vice President Network Planning & Partnerships

\j
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

              CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         DATE OF REPORT: April 22, 2003
                (Date of earliest event reported) April 22, 2003


                        DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


          OKLAHOMA                  000-29225               73-1513309
(State or other jurisdiction       (Commission            (IRS Employer
     of incorporation)             File Number)         Identification No.)


                               14201 Wireless Way
                          Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73134
               (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

       (405) 529-8500 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



Information To Be Included in the Report

Item 5. Other Events and Required FD Disclosure.

     The  Registrant  has been advised by its principal  shareholder,  Dobson CC
Limited  Partnership,  or DCCLP,  that  DCCLP  and Bank of  America,  N.A.  have
extended  the  time to  reach a  definitive  agreement  for  the  amendment  and
restructuring of the Bank's loan to DCCLP, until April 25, 2003.

Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

     (c)  Exhibits:

Exhibit
  No.                      Description
  ---                      -----------

99   Registrant's  press release  issued April 22, 2003, regarding  extension of
     time to reach a definitive agreement for the amendment and restructuring of
     Dobson CC Limited Partnership's loan with Bank of American, N.A.

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                             DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

                             By  BRUCE R. KNOOIHUIZEN
                                 Bruce R. Knooihuizen, Executive Vice President

April 22, 2003
<PAGE>
                                 EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
  No.         Description                          Method of Filing
  ---         -----------                          ----------------

  99   Registrant's press release issued   Filed herewith electronically
       April 22, 2003
#### Edith J. WALZ, as parent and natural guardian of Mark Walz, a minor, Appellant, v. The COMMERCIAL BANK AT WINTER PARK, a Florida banking corporation, I. D. Voldness and Mary T. Voldness, his wife, and Ronald R. Graves et al., Appellees.

No. 70-634.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Claude R. Edwards, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000815

15-SEP-2014

10:21 AM
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMPANY

(Section 302)

I, George M. Bachman, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Florida Public Utilities Company (the registrant);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 14, 2007

By  /s/ George M. Bachman

George M. Bachman

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31(b)
I, John D. Milton, Jr., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Florida Rock Industries,
Inc;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a.	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b.	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluations; and

c.	disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

a.	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information and

b.	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:  April 27, 2004
                                       JOHN D. MILTON, JR.
                                                JOHN D. MILTON, JR.
                                                Executive Vice President,
                                                Treasurer and Chief
                                                Financial Officer
1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       73,051
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          11,875
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         1,074
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   3,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,063
<COMMON>                                         2,395
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       11,303
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             15,480
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  27,228
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        600
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            23,500
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               5,900
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  31,835
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   89,063
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       20,712
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               782
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       5,049
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      18,624
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          2,088
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  24
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   2,112
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           709
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,403
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          7
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    1,396
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           447
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          559
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           4,022
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.93
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1238

CHARLES EVANS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

REPUBLIC TOBACCO,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, District

Judge. (CA-96-151-7-F)

Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 24, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Marilyn R. Forbes, Winston-Salem,

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Evans

v. Republic Tobacco, No. CA-96-151-7-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.2





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  this
Registration Statement of Fleming Companies, Inc. on Form S-
8  of  our report dated February 18, 2000, appearing in  the
Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Fleming Companies,  Inc.  and
subsidiaries for the year ended December 25, 1999.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
June 30, 2000