alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States

District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

___________

No. 95-2727

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

Ewen P. Barnett, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: February 14, 1996

 Filed: February 20, 1996 ___________

Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

After pleading guilty to making a false loan application in

violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1014 and 2, and to conspiring to make a

fraudulent loan application in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, Ewen

P. Barnett was sentenced to eight months imprisonment and ordered

to pay $10,000 restitution. Barnett appeals only the order of

restitution, arguing that the district court1 failed to consider

the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3664(a) before imposing

restitution, or relied upon objected-to portions of Barnett's

presentence report (PSR) without resolving factual disputes as to

his ability to pay restitution.

Having carefully reviewed the entire record and the parties'
-2-

submissions on appeal, we conclude that the district court

considered the necessary factors and properly exercised its

discretion in imposing restitution. See 18 U.S.C. § 3664(a), (d);

United States v. French, 46 F.3d 710, 716 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard

of review); see also United States v. Manzer, 69 F.3d 222, 229

(8th Cir. 1995). We are satisfied that the restitution

determination is supported by undisputed facts in the PSR.

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 10.24


                                     Form Of
                                Convertible Note
                                                                               $


This Convertible note is made on April 3, 2001.

Between the  Borrower  Alfacell  Corporation  referred to as "I" and the Lender,
______________ whose address is ___________________________

Borrower's Promise to Lender. In return for the loan received I promise to repay
this loan within ninety (90) days, unless the Lender has elected to exercise the
Lender option to convert this loan into  ____________  shares of Alfacell Common
Stock.  The  conversion  share price (90 (cent))  was  determined  by the 10 day
marketplace moving average for Alfacell Common Stock.

In addition, upon conversion,  the Lender will receive a three (3) year warrant,
for each share of  Converted  Alfacell  Common  Stock,  at $2.50 per share.  The
expiration date of the warrant is July 7, 2004.

Default.  If I fail to make any  payment  required by this note when due or if I
fail to keep any other promise I make in this note,  the Lender may declare that
I am in default on this note.  Upon  default,  I must  immediately  pay the full
amount and the Lender's costs of collection and reasonable attorney fees.



Witness:                                             Borrower:

                                                     ALFACELL CORPORATION



                                                     --------------------




<PAGE>



                               Schedule of Parties
                               To Convertible Note

PARTY                        AMOUNT OF NOTE               NUMBER OF SHARES
                                                          CONVERTIBLE INTO

Santiago Caasi               $19,998                      22,220
Delmer Dimzon                $19.998                      22,220
Janine Sitao                 $29,997                      33,330
Kuslim Shogen                $99,000                      110,000
Martin Stadler               $99,000                      110,000
Donald Conklin               $99,000                      110,000
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 663 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 663

  To repeal the provision of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 which 
  provides that the accumulated earnings tax shall be applied without 
        regard to the number of shareholders in the corporation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 1993

  Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the provision of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 which 
  provides that the accumulated earnings tax shall be applied without 
        regard to the number of shareholders in the corporation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) subsection (c) 
of section 532 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is hereby repealed.
    (b) The repeal made by subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years 
beginning after December 31, 1992.

                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal L 60/27 F

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 60 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5027 February 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 60

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5027 February 2007

---

| Contents | | Corrigenda | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Third procès-verbal of rectification to the Treaty between the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Member States of the European Union) and the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, concerning the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union (OJ L 236, 23.09.2003) | 1 |

Contents

Corrigenda

page

*

Third procès-verbal of rectification to the Treaty between the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Member States of the European Union) and the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, concerning the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union (OJ L 236, 23.09.2003)

OJ L 236, 23.09.2003

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
701/ Name(pleaseprint) 

### I**--~ffi;a;';i-·** 

## ·-1--1 E.-Mail 

### ! Phone ToAi/

### k/2i~!YL':________ ...

### L~~~h.t:!'.-T/C~_~ __ . .

### _~f:~?/Iv'~t;·Z<?~/'_~~e!-·_~~~j7e~~~J!-lr_=~,:r~_~ __ _

# !c-~2e--J'1-ili5dY\ 

# i**~fA/J&r&~rof£i)~'7P-if** \

# P;'2-~-'L-83]t1 1 

## l \CCC\\A.eJ

### .\~. 

### S**\~'b Wl~** **_Lrf_~!!!Q_~£\_L~~_Q** 

## __**J?J~$J\;\({;k1~~~I~~_~~lllj~~J~~/ ~~Lf=T!J~**  j



# . . r[ ar-; 

# }),/Jq 

# >r afe---

... ..
_

## _~_~ __

## ~~_**---_.~_** 

# t Jdip JfUglu:L"'I"J "1,-c..w. 

## t rj-? 

### 5J- LJ 

## 'fJ..



## ___**S45>~r( ~11&c/{.~L**  . ._ (::::(!J ID? P 

## t./r;.c**D_~ h~** **~_~_._~~J ~P{**  cf2-? Jev ZO"L

..

### -.~ j

-

### ~7 i....;.9_------' 

## o. ..-'2 'i .J I I r - - -- - -'



### !._f1JlA1Ct A

..

### J)~tL __ .. _... . 

## EfA __._______ HDl\.ty\ .11.

### ~L&~gfJj:.&D>/ __

### ~2D2 .. 

### SLp

..

### (P..tJl:-~-.8.---.J



# _**.J,~** ..U..!) 

## l»**~~._** 

## _.
__ ._ .c__ . i

## ~!Jl I L8:!

## t=_A_~~**£PA~** f;fJJ';

## ~,,_~_.i~t:_S!l!!!L~Required: Optional: Meeting with 3M Calendar Entry Wed 0410612011 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM Location: 4140 EPA East

Greg FritzlDC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim WillisIDC/USEPA/US@EPA, Maria Doa/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Rose AllisonIDC/USEPAlUS@EPA Andrea Pfahles-Hutchens/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Laurence LibeloIDC/USEPAlUS@EPA, Susan SharkeyIDCIUSEPA/US@EPA

Agenda:

• lntroducticn • 3M Brief History & Statusfor LCPFC's

• Bio-rncrutorinq Update • AFFF Management • Discussion & Follow up Attendees Mike Falco Gary Hohenstein Tom DiPasquaie Julie Hatcher (3M)
EXHIBIT 32.1



                                  CERTIFICATION
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     The  undersigned,  Louis J.  Rampino,  the  President  and Chief  Executive
Officer and Patrick E. Lamb, the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Chief  Accounting  Officer and  Treasurer of Fremont  General  Corporation  (the
"Company"),  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,  hereby certify that, to the best of
our knowledge:

          (i) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
     2005 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of
     section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (ii) the financial statements and disclosures  contained in the Report
     fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and
     results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  May 9, 2005


                                       /s/ LOUIS J. RAMPINO
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Louis J. Rampino,
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer



                                       /s/ PATRICK E. LAMB
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Patrick E. Lamb
                                       Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                                       Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and
                                       Treasurer
                                       (Principal Accounting Officer)
#### Sidney J. TILLMAN, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44598.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 7, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed. 287 So.2d 693.
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

**** SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITING ****

The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.

In re Estate of Mayer, Deceased. [Cite as In re Estate of Mayer (1994), Ohio St.3d .] Probate -- Joint and survivorship accounts -- Survivorship rights to sums remaining on deposit at death of depositor not defeated by extrinsic evidence that decedent did not intend to create in surviving party a present interest in the account during decedent's lifetime -- Opening of
account is conclusive evidence of intention to transfer to surviving party a survivorship interest in balance remaining in account at death. (No. 94-797 -- Submitted December 20, 1994 -- Decided December 30, 1994.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No.

L-93-131.

Wasserman, Bryan, Landry & Honold, John A. Landry and John C. Wasserman, for appellees Gary Blumenthal, Warner Blumenthal
and Walter Blumenthal. Eastman & Smith, James F. Nooney and John D. Willey, Jr., for appellant Jane Markwood.

Sua sponte, the judgment of the court of appeals is
reversed and the cause is remanded to that court for consideration of the appeal in light of Wright v. Bloom (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 596, 635 N.E.2d 31. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer,
JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7442

LEROY RICHARDSON-BEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BONNIE BOYETTE; DENNIS ROWLAND; C. ALSTON;

LIEUTENANT LANGSTON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-01-317-5-H)

Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 20, 2001

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy Richardson-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Leroy Richardson-Bey appeals the district court’s order and

order on reconsideration denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Richardson-Bey v. Boyette, No. CA-01-317-5-H (E.D.N.C. June 30 &

Aug. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 00-883.

#### Thorpe et ux. *v.*Redevelopment Authority of the City of Allentown.

Commw. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
263 La. 31

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles MONROE, Jr.

No. 52521.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 4, 1972.

Truly W. McDaniel, Shreveport, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Harry H. Howard, Asst. Atty. Gen., John A. Richardson, Dist. Atty., Albert S. Lutz, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Charles Monroe, Jr., was granted an out of time appeal from his jury conviction of armed robbery, La.R.S. 14:64, for which he was sentenced to serve thirty years in the State Penitentiary. In pursuing this appeal, he relies upon one bill of exceptions.

This bill pertains to the denial of a motion for new trial. The motion alleged a new trial should be granted because of the incompetence and ineffectiveness of trial counsel. No bills of exceptions were reserved during the trial, and therefore the defendant’s appellate counsel further contends in his motion for new trial that an appeal to this Court would be meaningless under the circumstances.

The errors asserted by the defendant cannot be reviewed by this Court on appeal as they were not objected to during the trial, nor were bills of exceptions reserved. La.C.Cr.P. art. 841. We are therefore limited on appeal to a review of the pleadings and proceedings for discoverable error. La.C.Cr.P. art. 920; State v. Ash, 257 La. 337, 242 So.2d 535 (1971). We find none.

The appropriate remedy for contentions such as those presented by the defendant is through habeas corpus proceedings. See State v. Washington, 261 La. 684, 260 So. 2d 668 (1972).*

For the above stated reasons, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

*

 In State ex rel. Monroe v. Henderson, 259 La. 686, 251 So.2d 381 (1971), the present defendant’s writ of habeas corpus, in which he voiced the same objections as he alleges on this appeal, was refused by this Court for the reason that, “The showing made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.”
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 30120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13810]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Washington and Oregon Charter Vessel Survey.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-xxxx.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular (request for a new information 
collection).
    Number of Respondents: 320.
    Average Hours per Response: Initial telephone screen: 2 minutes; 
follow-up detailed survey: 22 minutes.
    Burden Hours: 64.
    Needs and Uses: This request is for a new information collection.
    The Northwest Fisheries Science Center will conduct a cost and 
earnings survey of active marine charter fishing vessel companies in 
Washington and Oregon. The data collected will be used by the National 
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to address statutory and regulatory 
mandates to determine the quantity and distribution of net benefits 
derived from living marine resources as well as to predict the economic 
impacts from proposed management options on charter fishing businesses, 
shore side industries, and fishing communities. In particular, these 
economic data collection programs contribute to legally mandated 
analyses required under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act (MFCMS), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), and Executive Order 12866 (E.O. 
12866).
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. 
Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections 
currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d02041f0c121e382f20243e3e2422230d22202f6328223d632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f5babca7b4aaa68097989c86869c9a9bb59a9897db909a85db929a83">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to (202) 395-5806.

    Dated: June 22, 2018.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
 [FR Doc. 2018-13810 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 29776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13693]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Basic Energy Sciences 
Advisory Committee (BESAC). The Federal Advisory Committee Act requires 
that public notice of these meetings be announced in the Federal 
Register.

DATES: Thursday, July 12, 2018, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Friday, July 13, 
2018 8:00, a.m. to 12:00 noon.

ADDRESSES: Bethesda North Marriott Hotel and Conference Center, 5701 
Marinelli Drive, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katie Runkles, Office of Basic Energy 
Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy, Germantown Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585; Telephone: (301) 903-
6529.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of this Board is to make 
recommendation to DOE-SC with respect to the basic energy sciences 
research program.

Tentative Agenda

 Call to Order, Introductions, Review of the Agenda
 News From the Office of Science
 News From the Office of Basic Energy Sciences
 BES 40th Report Presentations
 Materials Sciences and Engineering Division COV Report
 Scientific User Facilities Division COV Meeting Announcement
 Public Comments
 Adjourn
Breaks Taken as Appropriate

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do 
so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral 
statements regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact 
Katie Runkles at (301) 903-6594 (fax), or [email protected] 
(email). Reasonable provisions will be made to include the scheduled 
oral statements on the agenda. The Chairperson of the Committee will 
conduct the meeting to facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Public comment will follow the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 45 days on the Committee's website: 
www.science.energy.gov/bes/besac/meetings.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on June 21, 2018.
Latanya Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-13693 Filed 6-25-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Richard L. Marcantonio, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of G&K Services, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report.Date: November 4, 2005         By:              /s/ Richard L. Marcantonio    Richard L. Marcantonio, President and Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)   
26