alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                         217,583
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     88,741
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               343,350
<PP&E>                                         334,843
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,034,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,984,324
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,437
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,977,579)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,034,182
<SALES>                                      5,369,597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,369,597
<CGS>                                          596,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,981,398
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             141,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (753,136)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (753,136)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (753,136)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)


</TABLE>
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 6, 2015














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.





(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---




Item 8.01   Other Events





The following is a summary of assets under management as of March 31, 2015 of Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (in millions):





By Investment VehicleProprietary funds$10,424Sub-advised funds740Institutional accounts4,934Total$16,098





By Investment StrategySmall Cap$1,602Small-Mid Cap1,588Large Cap7,876Select (All Cap)518Long-Short4,246Strategic Income268Total$16,098








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:April 6, 2015By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
#### SUN RAY PARK, INC. and Morris Liebman, individually, Appellants, v. Samuel COOK, Appellee.

No. 70-1279.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 29, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
----

UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington D.C. 20549FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2001

Commission File Number 0-2604

GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)**36-0887470**
(I.R.S. employer identification No.)**Delaware**
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)**One GBC Plaza,Northbrook, Illinois  60062**(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)**(847)  272-3700**
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes    X   ****No ____

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the close of the latest practicable date.

**                              Outstanding at****Class**April 30, 2001
Common Stock,  $.125 par value
13,331,432
Class B Common Stock, $.125 par value
2,398,275******GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION AND**SUBSIDIARIESFORM 10-QFor the Quarter Ended March 31, 2001Table of Contents**    **PART I.**Financial Information 
Page    
Item 1.
Financial statements (unaudited)       
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2001 and December 31,2000 **********
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

134885 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver & (82) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134885 COA: 265821 Washtenaw CC: 04-002017-FC GARY EARL LEITERMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 24, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be revie wed by this Court. The miscellaneous motion is GRANTED.

l1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 8, 2008

Clerk
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

▲ ★

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alex Gonzalez, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
Wireless Frontier Internet, Inc.n (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best
of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
          quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with
          the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: January 27, 2004

                   /s/ Alex Gonzalez
                   -----------------
                   Alex Gonzalez
                   Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
261 La. 1038

#### CENTRAL LOUISIANA TELEPHONE CO., Inc. v. LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.

No. 52434.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 1972.

In re: Central Louisiana Telephone Co., Inc. applying for writs of certiorari and mandamus.

Granted with stay order. (See order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Lewis S. Doherty III, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 9th day of June, 1972, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

It is further ordered that, in the meantime and until the further orders of this court all proceedings against the relator in said 19th Judicial District Court shall be stayed and suspended.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40966 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE ULISES FERNANDEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-83-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 11, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Ulises Fernandez-Garcia appeals his sentence for unlawfully entering the United States after having been previously deported. Fernandez-Garcia argues that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to Title 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b), based upon his prior commission of an aggravated felony, because the charging indictment did not mention the aggravated felony. His argument is foreclosed by United States v. Vasquez-Olvera , 999 F.2d 943 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES OF AMER1CA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHTNGTON, D.C. 20580 

Bureau of Consumer Protection 

Division of Enforcement 

April 17, 2018 

VIAFEDEX 

Paul D. Rubin, Esq. 

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP 

801 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 

Washington, DC 20004 

Dear Mr. Rubin: 

We received your submissions on behalfofyour client, EBSCO Sign Group, LLC 

("ESG" or the "Company"). During our review, we discussed concerns that marketing materials 

may have overstated the extent to which ESG's LED signs are made in the United States. 

As discussed, unqualified "Made in USA"/"Made in America" or "Built in USA"/"Built 

in America" claims on marketing materials likely suggest to consumers that all products 

advertised in those materials are "all or virtually all" made in the United States. Accordingly, 

ESG implemented a remedial action plan to avoid deceiving consumers. This plan included: 

(1) discontinuing use of unqualified U.S.-origin claims; (2) updating all marketing materials 

accordingly; (3) communicating changes and distributing updated materials to third-party 

dealers; and ( 4) training staffon how to make non-deceptive claims for ESG products. 

IfESG employs workers in the United States, it is appropriate for the Company to 

promote that fact, provided that marketing materials do not overstate the extent to which ESG 

products are made in the United States. Additionally, if, in the future, ESG can substantiate 

claims that particular products are " all or virtually all" made in the United States, it would be 

appropriate for the Company to update its marketing materials accordingly. 

Based on your actions and other factors, the staff has decided not to pursue this 

investigation any further. This action should not be construed as a determination that there was 

no violation of Section 5 ofthe Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45. The 

Commission reserves the right to take such further action as the public interest may require. 

~ 

Sincerely, 

Julia Solomon Ensor 

Staff Attorney 

Division ofEnforcement 

(202) 326-2377 

jensor@ftc.gov 

Crystal D. Ostrum 

Investigator 

Division ofEnforcement 

(202) 326-3405 

costrum@ftc.gov
#### AMATO v. HOUGH.

No. 37867.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Rehearing Denied March 25, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Frontier Internet, Inc.
(f/k/a  Fremont  Corporation)  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB for the periods
ended:  March  31,  2003 and June 30,  2003 as  filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Alex Gonzalez,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Wireless Frontier Internet, Inc. and will be retained by
Wireless Frontier Internet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

May 27, 2004                        /s/ Alex Gonzalez
                                    --------------------------
                                        Alex Gonzalez
                                        Chief Executive Officer
|                        |                            |                    |                      |                                           |                                   |                                  |                          |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|------------------------|----------------------------|--------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------|--------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| SecurityType           | SecurityClass Title        | FeeCalculationRule | Amount Registered(1) | Proposed MaximumOffering Price PerUnit(2) | MaximumAggregate OfferingPrice(2) | Fee Rate                         | Amount ofRegistrationFee |  |
| Equity                 | CommonShares, no par value | Other(2)           | 300,000              | $182.76                                   | $54,828,000                       | $0.0000927($92.70 per$1,000,000) | $5,082.56                |  |
| Total Offering Amounts |                            | $54,828,000        |                      | $5,082.56                                 |                                   |
| Total Fee Offsets      |                            |                    |                      | —                                   |                                   |
| Net Fee Due            |                            |                    |                      | $5,082.56                                 |                                   |
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE
      15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of Rick’s Cabaret International, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Eric S. Langan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:
                December 27, 2006
            By:
            /s/
                Eric S. LanganEric
                S. LanganChief
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                Officer
#### Benjamin FRIEDMAN and Solitron Devices, Inc., Petitioners, v. George W. REILAND, Respondent.

No. 39802.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 20, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
FTC Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and Workplace Inclusion 

Organization Chart 

[ l 

[....____ __ Jt-----=-=------i[-----________...l ______________ J 

 

 

 

 

 

Teresa J. Kelsey 

EEO Specialist 

Dione J. Stearns 

Acting Director 

Stephanie M. Tillerson 

EEO Specialist 

Vacant 

Attorney Advisor 

FTC Regional Offices 

Collateral Duty EEO Counselors 

John M. Vega – East Central 

Roberto C. Menjivar – Midwest 

Karen Dahlberg O’Connell – Northeast 

Breena Roos – Northwest 

Tonia C. Jackson – Southeast 

Arlene Hughes-Carpenter – Southwest 

Delilah Vinzon – Western (Los Angeles) 

Erika Wodinsky – Western (San Francisco) 

Last Updated: March 2023
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Matthew A. Rimmen, Appellant.

[722 NYS2d 451]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed *(see, People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Broderick, J. — Attempted Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Scudder, Burns and Lawton, JJ.
EXHIBIT 12(a)

FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
											      Three Months
												 Ended
												March 31,
												  2000
											       -----------
											       (millions)
<S>                                                                                                 <C>
Earnings, as defined:
  Net income ..............................................................................         $121
  Income taxes ............................................................................           57
  Fixed charges, included in the determination of net income, as below ....................           65
  Distributed income of independent power investments......................................           13
  Less: Equity in earnings of independent power investments ...............................            2
    Total earnings, as defined ............................................................         $254

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges ........................................................................         $ 62
  Rental interest factor ..................................................................            1
  Fixed charges included in nuclear fuel cost .............................................            2
  Fixed charges, included in the determination of net income ..............................           65
  Capitalized interest ....................................................................            5

    Total fixed charges, as defined .......................................................         $ 70

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ........................................................         3.63
</TABLE>
#### Raymond PANTON and Allstate Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Daniel ROBINSON, Appellee.

No. 72-1067.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 22, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Amendment No.
1 to the Annual Report of Azzurra Holding Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December
31, 2014 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Daniel Rumsey, Principal
Executive and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certifies, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.








Date:
April 9, 2019
/s/ Daniel W.
RumseyDaniel
W. Rumsey
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive and Financial Officer)