alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-07 -009 7-CR IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL B DE CE MB ER13, 2007

_________

_________

_________

___ RICARDO FLORES MENDOZA, APP ELL ANT

V. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, APPEL LEE

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 10 8 DIS T RI CTCOU RTOF P OT T ERCOU NTY; TH NO . 48, 446- E; H ON ORABLE RI CH AR D DA NB OLD , J UD GE

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. ME MO RA ND UM OPI NI ON App ellant , Ricardo Flores M e n d o z a, w as con v icted o f posse ssion of

a dea dly weapon w it hin a pe nal i nst it uti on and sent enced to seven y ears in the Inst it uti onal D iv is ion of the Texas Dep artment of Cr imi nal Ju sti ce. The s entenc e was ord ered to beg in upon t he compl eti on of the sent ence the a ppel lan t was s er v ing at the t ime of the i nst ant o ffense. W e affi r m. A p p e ll a n t ’s a tt o rn e y h a s f il e d a n A n d e rs b ri e f a n d a m o t io n t o wit h d ra w. An d e rs v. Cal ifor nia , 386 U. S. 7 38, 8 7 S. Ct . 139 6, 18 L.E d. 2d 498 (1 967) . In s uppor t of hi s mot ion2

to w it hdraw , c ounse l cer ti fies that he hasdi li g entl y rev iewed th e record, an d i n hi s o pin ion , the record reflects n o re v ersi ble er ro r upon w hic h an appeal ca n be predi cat ed. Id. at 74 4- 45. In c ompli ance w it h Hi g h v . Stat e, 573 S. W .2d 8 07, 8 13 ( Tex .C ri m.App. 1978) , c ounse l has candi dly

di sc uss ed w hy , und er

the cont ro ll ing auth or it ies , t here i s no er ro r in the t ri al cour t’ s judg ment. Additi onal ly , c ounse l has cer ti fied th at he hasprov ide d appel lan t a copy of the And ers b ri ef and moti on tow it hdraw and app ro pr iat ely adv is ed appe ll ant o f hisr ig ht to fil e a p roserespon se in thi s matter . Stafford v . St ate, 813 S. W .2d 5 03, 5 10 (Tex .C ri m.App. 1991) . The cour t hasal so adv is ed appe ll anto f his ri g ht to fil e a pro se re spons e. Appel lan t hasnot filed a respon se. By his And ers brief , coun sel raises groun ds tha t could possib ly supp ort an a ppe al, but concl udes the a ppeal i s frivolo us. W e have rev iewed th ese g ro unds and made an inde pen den t rev iew

of the en tire record to d e t e rm ine w het her the re are any arg uab le g ro unds w hic h mi g ht s uppor t an appeal . See P enson v . O hio , 488 U .S. 75, 109 S. Ct . 346 , 1 0 2 L . E d . 2 d 3 0 0 ( 1 9 8 8 ) ; B l e d s o e v . S t a t e , 1 7 8 S . W. 3 d 8 2 4 ( T e x . C r i m . A p p . 2 0 0 5 ) . W e have foun d no such arguab le groun ds an d agree w ith cou nsel th at the a ppe al is friv olou s. Accordin gly , coun sel’s mot ion to w ith d ra w is hereby g rante d an d the trial court’s jud g ment i s a ff ir med.
Mackey K. Hancock Justice Do not p ubl is h.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND THE BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             101
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   107
<PP&E>                                              75
<DEPRECIATION>                                      71
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     113
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               78
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        35
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549



                                    FORM 8-K
                                 CURRENT REPORT


     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


         Date of Report     August 1, 2002
         (Date of earliest event reported)     July 29, 2002


                            SEVEN SEAS PETROLEUM INC.
             (Exact Name of registrant as Specified in its Charter)

         Cayman Islands                   0-22483               73-468669
(State or Other Jurisdiction of   (Commission File Number)   (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)                            Identification Number)


                  5555 SAN FELIPE, SUITE 1700, HOUSTON, TEXAS   77056
               (Address of Principal Executive Offices)       (Zip Code)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (713) 622-8218

<PAGE>
Item 5.  Other Events

     The Company has resumed drilling on the Escuela 2 exploration well. The
well is currently drilling at 18,808 feet in interbedded sandstones and
siltstones. Shortly after drilling in new formation below the 7 5/8 inch liner,
there was a gas show of 12 percent with traces of heavier hydrocarbons (C2-C5)
and an approximate 35 barrel influx of fluid. Initial analysis of the fluid
entering the wellbore indicates water with a skim of oil.

     The Company believes that the geological information available at this time
is not conclusive enough to determine the exact stratigraphic and structural
position of the bottom of the wellbore. However, Seven Seas believes it is
likely that the Cambao fault has not been encountered and the Escuela 2 is
currently drilling in the lower part of the Cretaceous Villeta formation. A
review of drilling samples and paleontological work is being carried out on a
continual basis to aid in the geological interpretation.

     Seven Seas plans to continue drilling to a total depth of approximately
19,500 feet, provided wellbore conditions permit. When the well reaches total
depth, the Company plans to run electric logs for further evaluation.

Item 7.  Financial Statements and Exhibits

         (c)  Exhibits

                 99       July 29, 2002 press release

<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                               SEVEN SEAS PETROLEUM INC.

                               By:   RONALD A. LEFAIVE
                               Name: Ronald A. Lefaive
                               Title: Vice President of Finance and Chief
                                        Financial Officer

Date:  August 1, 2002
<PAGE>
                                INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.   Description                  Method of Filing
-----------   -----------                  ----------------

     99       July 29, 2002 Press release  Filed herewith electronically
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-83463]

# AGENCY:

Securities and Exchange Commission.

# ACTION:

Request for comment.

# SUMMARY:

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is providing notice that it is seeking comments on its draft 2018-2022 Strategic Plan. The draft Strategic Plan includes a draft of the SEC's mission, vision, values, strategic goals, and planned initiatives.

# DATES:

Comments should be received on or before July 25, 2018.

# ADDRESSES:

Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

### Electronic Comments

                    Send an email to                     *PerformancePlanning@sec.gov.*

### Paper Comments

Send paper comments to Nicole Puccio, Branch Chief, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-2521.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nicole Puccio, Branch Chief, Office of Financial Management, at (202) 551-6638, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-2521.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The draft strategic plan is available at the Commission's website at                     *https://www.sec.gov/​files/​sec-strategic-plan-2018-2022.pdf*                     or by contacting Nicole Puccio, Branch Chief, Office of Financial Management, at (202) 551-6638, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-2521.                

By the Commission.

Dated: June 19, 2018.

Brent J. Fields,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-13484 Filed 6-22-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### Rafael LORIE, Petitioner, v. YALE OGRON MANUFACTURING CO. et al., Respondents.

No. 43481.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 25, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
The FTC’s CARS Rule protects 

consumers and benefits honest dealers.

Here’s how:

ftc.gov/carsruledealersguide

1 Prohibits misrepresentations about material information.

The CARS Rule makes it illegal for a dealer to make misrepresentations about 

certain topics that would affect a consumer’s buying or leasing choices. Deceptive 

claims about price, financing, or add-ons are a few examples. 

2

Requires dealers to clearly disclose the offering price – the actual 

price anyone can pay to get the car, excluding only required 

government charges.

Before they visit the dealership and throughout the transaction, consumers have 

the right to know the drive-off-the-lot price. If a dealer mentions optional add-ons, 

the dealer has to tell the consumers they can say no. And if discussing a monthly 

payment, the dealer has to tell the consumer the total payment.

3 Makes it illegal for dealers to charge consumers for add-ons that don’t 

provide a benefit. 

Under the CARS Rule, if the consumer won’t benefit from an add-on product or 

service, the dealer can’t charge for it.

4 Requires dealers to get consumers’ express, informed consent before 

charging them for anything. 

That means no surprise fees or hidden charges. Dealers must get a buyer’s clear 

and informed “yes” to what they’re buying and how much they’re being charged.

Combating 

Auto 

Retail 

Scams
#### Edward G. BUDD, Jr., et al., as Trustee of Greit Realty Trust, Appellants, v. The ALLEN MORRIS COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-108.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 7, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND UNAUDITED 
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,168,714
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,770,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                    91,333
<INVENTORY>                                  1,232,394
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,476,934
<PP&E>                                         651,467
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,948,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,024,454
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,880
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,801,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,948,599
<SALES>                                      6,198,291
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,198,291
<CGS>                                        4,163,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,974,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             151,556
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                682,181
<INCOME-TAX>                                   272,873
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            409,308
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   409,308
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        



</TABLE>
(4910-I3-Pj 'ONCURRENCL' O"""G SVMBOI.

RlN 2120-AA64 Federal Aviation Administration DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AT10N

Airplanes; Airbus Model A330-300 Series Airplanes; and Airbus Model A340-200 an 14CFR Part 39 ~ (/ (Docket No. FAA-2010-0952; Directorate Identifier 201O-NM-131-AD; Amendme 

# :n7JIG ,Cobb5 <7-0\ \ - 

# a 1-02 • 

# 7 39-*****' AD l4H-&-**-**j ( 

# tv

, mNG5'l"MllOl. ~(()( 'm

# ."E /t//:V,. 

# -fzt::> Ain\'orthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-201. -202, -203, -223, and -243
-300 Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administr~tion (FAA), Department ofTransportation "o;;SYMIlOL (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products lis OlmNG SVM"Ql above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) IN"'.,L""O originated by an aviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct an unsafe "ATF. condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: "OUT'NO SYM~O'.
L~mAL""[] [1']l1eFAA published SFAR 88 (Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88). By mail referenced 04/00/02/07/01-L296 ofMarch 4th, 2002 and 04/00/02/07/03-L024 ofFebruary 3rd. 2003 the JAA [Joint Aviation Authorities] recommended to the National Aviation Authorities (NAA) the application ofa similar regulation. DAm

The aim ofthis regulation is to require 

## *** adefinition review against explosion hazards. 

# • 

# • • • • • •
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Massey Energy Company (the
Company) for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric B. Tolbert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|             |  |  |  |                                           
|------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|May 10, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Eric B. Tolbert                       
|             |  |  |  | Eric B. Tolbert                           
|             |  |  |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Willie Lee MOORE and Mary Moore, his wife, Appellants, v. The SCHOOL BOARD OF PINELLAS COUNTY, Florida and Continental Casualty Company, Appellees.

No. 73-155.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 6, 1974.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1974.

*245I. W. Williams of Minnis, Williams & Milton, St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Thomas B. Freeman of Harrison, Greene, Mann, Davenport, Rowe & Stanton, Seminole, for appellees.

HOBSON, Judge.

Appellant Willie Lee Moore was a patient in Bay Front Medical Center recovering from an operation performed by Dr. R. Huston Babcock. On May 20, 1970, Dr. Babcock ordered an indwelling Foley catheter be inserted in appellant. One Ronald Curran, who at the time was a student nurse engaged in on-job training at Bay Front Medical Center, inserted the catheter. At the time Curran was a trainee at the hospital under an agreement between the appellee school board and the hospital. Appellants allege that Curran negligently and carelessly performed the catheterization causing appellant Willie Lee Moore’s penis to become swollen, inflamed and painful, which required surgery.

The agreement between the appellee school board and the hospital contained, among other things, the following:

> "IV. THE AFFILIATED AGENCY (HOSPITAL) AGREES TO:

> ******

> 4.c. Provide the instruction, guidance, supervision, counseling and evaluation of the practical nurse students in cooperation with the SCHOOL.

> ******

> 5. Share and assist in the responsibilities for the guidance and supervision of the students, particularly in restricted and specialized areas.

> ******

> V. THE SCHOOL AGREES:

> ******

> 3. That the faculty shall be responsible for:

> a. Selecting patient assignments in cooperation with the hospital professional nursing personnel and supervising jointly the practical clinical nursing practice learning experience of students.”

Curran testified on deposition that a registered nurse employed by the appellee school board supervised him during the time he was in training at the hospital.

The appellee Continental at the time was the insurer of the school board.

The trial court, on motion for summary final judgment filed by the appellee school board, granted a summary final judgment in its behalf on the grounds that the school board did not supervise, control or direct Curran’s actions in regards to the care of the appellant.

On review of the record on appeal, we find there are genuine issues of material fact to be determined as to the liability, if any, of the appellees in this cause.

For the foregoing reasons the summary final judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

MANN, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lester BRADLEY.

No. 61858.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 14, 1978.

Elizabeth W. Cole, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains a summary of financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations and is qualifed in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          67,065
<SECURITIES>                                   151,055
<RECEIVABLES>                                  452,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                    37,786
<INVENTORY>                                    706,695
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,495,795
<PP&E>                                       1,014,405
<DEPRECIATION>                                 431,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,706,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,011,499
<BONDS>                                      1,170,940
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,130
<COMMON>                                        70,749
<OTHER-SE>                                     780,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,706,506
<SALES>                                      2,700,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,700,371
<CGS>                                        1,565,710
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,756,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                87,819
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,239
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (95,602)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,647
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (123,249)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (123,249)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.75)
        

</TABLE>
No. 00-629.

No. 00-652.

#### Virginia *v.*Kingdom of Spain; and Sea Hunt, Inc. *v.*Kingdom of Spain.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 221 F. 3d 634.
259 La. 701

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert D. GATLIN v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51595.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1971.

In re: Robert D. Gatlin applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied; the ruling of the trial court on the evidentiary hearing is correct.