alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________

Project No.: 0172.07.005.503 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: 304(m) Annual Review 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

 Outgoing Call

Date: 2/12/2010 Time: 12:30 pm EST

Company Name: John Morrell & Co.

Contact Name: Steve Draveland

Phone No.: 605-330-3656

Name: Elizabeth Sabol Eastern Research Group

GENERAL SUBJECT : Basis of Mercury and Mercury Compound load reported to TRI in 2008

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I called John Morrell & Co. on February 12, 2010, to speak with Steve Draveland. Mr. Draveland and I briefly 

discussed the mercury and mercury compound discharges that the facility reported to TRI for 2008. Mr. 

Draveland stated that the facility estimates the calculated load from annual metals testing the facility performs 

for the city discharge. These data are multiplied by the annual flow to estimate the direct and indirect loads for 

the facility. 

The facility reported having directly discharged 1,572 lbs of mercury and mercury like compounds and 

discharged 140 lbs to a POTW. I asked Mr. Draveland if he thought these discharges were accurate or a 

possible overestimate. Mr. Draveland explained that the facility enters the detection limit as the concentration 

for metals because TRI does not acknowledge “<” signs in their data entry. He stated that all metal testing for 

the facility results in data below the detection limit and that these discharges are likely an overestimate.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-2204

ABU ALLIAH MOHAMMED BADRUDDOZA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE UNITED STATES LAW ENFORCEMENT UNITS - THE POLICE

DEPARTMENTS; ALEXANDRIA POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (1:07-cv-01074-LMB-BRP)

Submitted: March 27, 2008 Decided: April 1, 2008

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abu Alliah Mohammed Badruddoza, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Abu Alliah Mohammed Badruddoza appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Badruddoza v. U.S. Law Enforcement Units, No.

1:07-cv-01074-LMB-BRP (E.D. Va. Oct. 31, 2007). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
261 La. 1049

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Enola Mae DUHON.

No. 52476.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 1972.

In re: Enola Mae Duhon applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus, and stay order.

Writ denied: relator has an adequate remedy by appeal in the event of conviction.
# Official Journal C 199/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.199.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 199 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5321 July 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.199.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 199

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5321 July 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 199/01 | Commission Decision of 19 July 2010 concerning the financing for the year 2010 of activities in the veterinary field related to the European Union's information policy, support of international organisations, disease notification and computerisation of veterinary procedures | 1 |
| 2010/C 199/02 | Commission Decision of 20 July 2010 setting up a Financial Services User Group | 12 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 199/01

Commission Decision of 19 July 2010 concerning the financing for the year 2010 of activities in the veterinary field related to the European Union's information policy, support of international organisations, disease notification and computerisation of veterinary procedures

1

2010/C 199/02

Commission Decision of 20 July 2010 setting up a Financial Services User Group

12

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 199/03 | Euro exchange rates | 15 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 199/03

Euro exchange rates

15

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 199/04 | MEDIA Mundus — Call for proposals 2011 | 16 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 199/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5752 — Fortress Investment Group/Residential Capital Residential mortgage business) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 19 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2010/C 199/04

MEDIA Mundus — Call for proposals 2011

16

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2010/C 199/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5752 — Fortress Investment Group/Residential Capital Residential mortgage business) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

19

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Private Calendar No. 

4

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 808

[Report No. 103–221]

A BILL

For the relief of James B. Stanley.

AUGUST 6, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and

ordered to be printed
VII

Private Calendar No. 4

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 808

[Report No. 103–221]

For the relief of James B. Stanley.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1993

Mr. JOHNSTON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

AUGUST 6, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed

A BILL

For the relief of James B. Stanley.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.

4 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall

5 pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise ap6 propriated, $400,577 to James B. Stanley.

7 (b) BASIS.—The payment required by subsection (a)

8 shall be to compensate James B. Stanley for the physical,
2

•HR 808 RH

1 psychological, and economic injuries sustained by him as

2 a result of the administration to him, without his knowl3 edge, of lysergic acid diethylamide by United States Army

4 personnel in 1958.

5 SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

6 The payment made pursuant to section 1(a) shall be

7 in full satisfaction of all claims James B. Stanley may

8 have against the United States for—

9 (1) the injuries received by him as described in

10 section 1; and

11 (2) for any injuries received by him subsequent

12 to his discharge from the United States Army that

13 are the result of the injuries described in section 1.

14 SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.

15 James B. Stanley shall not be eligible for any com16 pensation or benefits from the Department of Veterans

17 Affairs or the Department of Defense for any injury re18 ceived by him as described in section 1.

19 SEC. 4. LIMITATION OF ATTORNEYS’ OR AGENTS’ FEES.

20 It shall be unlawful for an amount of more than 10

21 per centum of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to

22 be paid to or received by any attorney or agent of James

23 B. Stanley for any service rendered in connection with the

24 payment made by this Act. Any person who violates this

25 section shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be subject
3

•HR 808 RH

1 to a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United States

2 Code.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000,000
<CIK>                                        0000357261
<NAME>                                       FLORIDA PROGRESS CORPORATION
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          3-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                                           PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                                  3,526
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                                  870
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       764
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                                     123
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                               180
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             5,463
<COMMON>                                                   1,209
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                          704
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                             1,913
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                   34
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                       1,820
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                                56
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                                 25
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                             1,615
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                              5,463
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                                    748
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                          20
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                   653
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                   673
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                       75
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                            (1)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                                74
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      32
<NET-INCOME>                                                  42
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                    0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                                 42
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                      51
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                      0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                        89
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.43
        





</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 10.8a**

**AMENDMENT TO 2008 CHANGE OF CONTROL**

**EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

This Amendment dated as of the              day of             (“Amendment”) revises that certain Change of Control Employment Agreement dated as of the             day of             , 2008 executed by and between The PMI Group, Inc., (the “Company”) and            (the “Executive”). 

WHEREAS, the partiespreviously executed the above Change of Control Employment Agreement (“Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend theAgreement as set out below; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the Agreementis amended as follows: 

Section 9 is hereby deleted in its entirety. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set the Executive’s hand and the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed in its name on itsbehalf, all as of the day and year first above written. Except as amended herein, all other terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.
# Official Journal L 220/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 220 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6223 August 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 220

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6223 August 2019

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1372 of 19 August 2019 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards monitoring and reporting
  (notified under document C(2019) 6026)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1373 of 22 August 2019 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2019) 6246)

   (
  1
  ) | 6 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1372 of 19 August 2019 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards monitoring and reporting
  (notified under document C(2019) 6026)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2019) 6026)

1

1

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1373 of 22 August 2019 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2019) 6246)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2019) 6246)

1

6

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

53) ll-E-13 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:04 AM Sheet 53 of 264 
P.2 

CONTACT REPORT FORM 

PES PROJECT NO. N204 

$''t-\h 

Date Company 

9-27-93 RTM Systems (Glas-Craft) 

Description: 

Contact 

Mike Keegan 

Phone 

(317) 875-5592 

Mr. Keegan indicated that RTM Systems makes molds only, no presses. The 

RTM molds are out of FRP material and are around $5,000 to $10,000. Presses are 

not normally used with these molds, clamping is done by C-clamps, bolts, or 

hydraulic lift cylinders. The process is typically 15 to 20 percent slower than 

closed molding with presses, but perhaps $100,000 cheaper. The quality was also 

mentioned to be better with RTM than sprayup. 

dc
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/30 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
NO. 07-07-0097-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

DECEMBER 13, 2007

______________________________

RICARDO FLORES MENDOZA, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 108 DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; TH

NO. 48,446-E; HONORABLE RICHARD DANBOLD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Ricardo Flores Mendoza, was convicted of possession of a deadly

weapon within a penal institution and sentenced to seven years in the Institutional Division

of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The sentence was ordered to begin upon the

completion of the sentence the appellant was serving at the time of the instant offense.

We affirm.

Appellant’s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw. Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967). In support of his motion
2

to withdraw, counsel certifies that he has diligently reviewed the record, and in his opinion,

the record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can be predicated. Id. at 744-

45. In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978), counsel

has candidly discussed why, under the controlling authorities, there is no error in the trial

court’s judgment. Additionally, counsel has certified that he has provided appellant a copy

of the Anders brief and motion to withdraw and appropriately advised appellant of his right

to file a pro se response in this matter. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510

(Tex.Crim.App. 1991). The court has also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se

response. Appellant has not filed a response.

By his Anders brief, counsel raises grounds that could possibly support an appeal,

but concludes the appeal is frivolous. We have reviewed these grounds and made an

independent review of the entire record to determine whether there are any arguable

grounds which might support an appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346,

102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We

have found no such arguable grounds and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is hereby granted and the trial court’s

judgment is affirmed.

Mackey K. Hancock

 Justice

Do not publish.
#### James M. WEARN, Appellant, v. Joan WEARN, Appellee.

No. 73-799.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 18, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James C. Downey, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### ALERT AIR CONDITIONING AND HEATING COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. Curtis D. GENDERS and Linda G. Genders, Appellees.

No. 72-624.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 7, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000888 24-APR-2019 09:55 AM
263 La. 359

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Basil M. SMITH, Jr.

No. 52866.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1972.

In re: Basil M. Smith, Jr. applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ granted: Since the record does not show that a bill of information or indictment has been filed, La.C.Cr.P. art. 384, the trial court is ordered to conduct a hearing upon applicant’s petition for habeas corpus.

BARHAM, J., dissents from the refusal to grant the writ and discharge the defendant and assigns reasons.

DIXON, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted without hearing.

BARHAM, Justice,

is of the opinion that this writ should be granted and the relator ordered discharged forthwith. Relator was arrested on June 1, 1972. Some kind of proceeding, not an arraignment proceeding, was held fifteen days later where relator asked for counsel as an indigent. The court merely referred relator to the Indigent Defender Board and apparently washed its hands of any further responsibility for appointment of counsel.

Thirty days later a lawyer was notified by the clerk of court that he was counsel for the relator. The lawyer did not see relator for twelve more days. Relator was held in jail without counsel, without preliminary hearing, without indictment or information and without arraignment for fifty-seven days. After July 12, the effective date of Act 700 of 1972, the Court was in violation of the provisions of that act for compulsory appointment of counsel. The penalty for failure to timely appoint counsel is the release of the party incarcerated.

As if this were not enough, relator has now been detained in jail for approximately five months *without the filing of an indictment or hill of information*charging him with an offense, C.Cr.P. art. 384. He was without counsel for fifty-seven days of this time. During all of this time he has had no preliminary examination or probable cause hearing. See Pugh v. Rainwater, 332 F.Supp. 1107 (D.C.1971), Cf. Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484, at pp. 496-498, Headnote 14-20. Moreover, no bail hearing and no arraignment were had. Relator is entitled to be discharged by this Court for on the face of the application for writ of habeas corpus his right to freedom is established. A hearing cannot cure the defect of the lack of a preliminary hearing and arraignment and the failure to file an indictment for five months. This relator has been denied his civil rights.

I respectfully dissent from the refusal of this Court to grant the writ without delay and without hearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 685 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 685

                    For the relief of Henry Johnson.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 1993

 Mr. McNulty introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Henry Johnson.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the time 
limitations specified in section 3744(b) of title 10, United States 
Code, shall not apply with respect to awarding a medal of honor under 
section 3741 of such title to Henry Johnson (service number 10-33-48) 
for acts of heroism during World War I while a sergeant in the United 
States Army.

                                 <all>
```
|                                           |                                                           |   |
|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| MASSEY      ENERGY COMPANY                     |
|                                           |                                                           |
| By:                                            | /s/      John M. Poma                                     |   |
| Name:                                          | John      M. Poma                                         |   |
| Title:                                         | Vice      President and ChiefAdministrative      Officer  |   |
|  /s/ Eric. B. TolbertERIC      B. TOLBERT |