alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010, (the Report) of First
West Virginia Bancorp, Inc., the (Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                                                                            
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2010 |  | /s/ Sylvan J. Dlesk                                                                                        
|                   |  | Sylvan J. Dlesk                                                                                            
|                   |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/Director(Principal Executive Officer)                      
|                   | 
|Date: May 11, 2010 |  | /s/ Francie P. Reppy                                                                                       
|                   |  | Francie P. Reppy                                                                                           
|                   |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and
Chief Financial Officer(Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Certification of
CEO





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Frequency Electronics, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Martin
B. Bloch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/  Martin
      Bloch
            
            September
      14, 2009Martin
      B. BlochChief
      Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.




This
certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”).  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-60899

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICKY BERNARD HARDIN,

also known as Nard,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:97-CR-133-1-S

--------------------

June 18, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ricky Bernard Hardin, federal prisoner # 10719-042, appeals

from the district court's denial of his motion to modify sentence

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Hardin, who received a twolevel sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c) as an

organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor of criminal activity,

argues that Amendment 500 to the sentencing guidelines clarified
No. 01-60899

-2-

the law concerning such enhancements and should be applied

"retroactively" to reduce his sentence. 

Amendment 500 took effect on November 1, 1993, prior to

Hardin's sentencing in 1998. See U.S.S.G., App. C, Amendment

500. Accordingly, Hardin's 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is not

based on a sentencing range that has "subsequently" been lowered

by the Sentencing Commission. See United States v. Alvarez, 210

F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000). 

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 21.1

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


1.  Mental Health Outcomes, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

2.  Horizon Mental Health Management, Inc., a Texas corporation formerly known
    as Horizon Mental Health Services, Inc., is the successor by merger to
    Horizon Mental Health Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation formerly known
    as Horizon Health Management Company.*

3.  HHG Colorado, Inc., a Colorado corporation, d/b/a Mountain Crest Hospital,
    Inc.

4.  HHMC Partners, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

5.  Florida Professional Psychological Services, Inc., a Florida corporation,
    d/b/a Professional Psychological Services, Inc.

____________________________________

    * Horizon Mental Health Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was
      formerly known as Horizon Mental Health Services, Inc. and Horizon
      Health Group, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE SEPTEMBER 30, 1995
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          397464
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1090
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  3310
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  2295
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     418927
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         1774381
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           1756550
<LOANS>                                        4403973
<ALLOWANCE>                                      71008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7341820
<DEPOSITS>                                     5945992
<SHORT-TERM>                                    619085
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              65228
<LONG-TERM>                                      49686
<COMMON>                                        138191
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      99362
<OTHER-SE>                                      424276
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 7341820
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 292972
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               116745
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  4539
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                414319
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              170766
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              208661
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           205658
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     3294
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (21778)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 186370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  72584
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       46606
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     46606
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.08
<LOANS-NON>                                      26664
<LOANS-PAST>                                     11785
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   545
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  22300
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 72867
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    15920
<RECOVERIES>                                      9134
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                71008
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             71008
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### John N. LEOPOLD and the Wanda Marine Corporation, a foreign corporation, Petitioners, v. RICHARD BERTRAM & COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Respondent.

No. 43849.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 12, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 4, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C.' J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### R. H. BUBIER, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Gerald SMITH et al., Respondents.

No. 43628.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 14, 1973.

Cause dismissed.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
---

March 31, 2010

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Great Basin Gold Ltd. (the "Company")
|--- | -------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F           
|    | Consent of Expert                    

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2009, and any amendments
thereto, (the Annual Report) to be filed by the Company with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). The Annual Report
incorporates by reference the Annual Information Form of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2009.

On my own behalf and on behalf of Geologix ("Geologix"), I hereby consent to the use of my name and Geologix's name in connection with reference to my and Geologix's involvement in the preparation of the following technical report (the "Technical Report"):

- Revised Technical Report on the June 2009 Update of the Mineral Resource Estimate for Hollister Gold Mine dated October 30, 2009,
- Revised Technical Report Update on the September 2009 Mineral Resource Estimate for the Burnstone Gold Project dated November 9, 2009

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof, in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report.

I also consent to the use of my name and Geologix's name in connection with reference to my and Geologix's involvement in the preparation of the Technical Report and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof, and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the information derived from the Technical Report in the Company's Form F-10 Registration Statements, as amended, filed with the SEC under File No. 333-157767 and File No. 333-163021.

Yours truly,

GeoLogix Mineral Resource Consultants (Pty) Ltd.

|/s/ G.J. van der Heever                         | 
|----------------------------------------------- | 
|Gideon (Deon) J. van der Heever, Pri. Sci. Nat. | 

---
EXHIBIT 23.2

                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the 1999 Omnibus Securities
Plan of our report dated October 21, 1999 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Temtex
Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries included in its Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended August 31, 1999, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Dallas, Texas
April 4, 2000
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4115

_____________________________

MARILYN BOWEN GRIFFIN, as 

Personal Representative for the 

Estate of James C. Bowen,

Appellant,

v.

FAS CAPITAL, LLC, a Georgia 

Limited Liability Company,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Adrian G. Soud, Judge.

June 28, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

James H. Post of Smith, Hulsey & Busel, Jacksonville, for 

Appellant.

Michael Fox Orr and Joseph D. Pickles of the Law Offices of 

Dawson & Orr, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6427** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. KENNY REGAN MAJOR , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Spartanburg
. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 7:06

- cr - 00813

- HMH

- 1; 7:10

- cv - 70143

- HMH )

Submitted : June 17, 2010 Decided: June 28, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Kenny Regan Major, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 P ER CURIAM: Kenny Regan Major seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 20 10 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2 253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standar d by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the d istrict court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Major has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts3 and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Office of the Executive Director

Organizational Chart

OED Front Office

David Robbins

Executive Director

Monique Fortenberry

Deputy Executive Director

David Rebich

Deputy Executive Director

Last Updated: January 2023

Dianne Campbell

Chief Human Capital Officer

HCMO

Randy Salzer

Acting Chief Financial Officer

FMO

Mark Gray

Acting Chief Information Officer

OCIO

Holly Frost

Chief Admin Svcs Officer

OCASO

Front Office Support Team

• Management Analyst

• Honors Paralegal(s)
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906


of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Friedman Industries,
Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ben Harper, Senior Vice
President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 14, 2007



| |                  
| | -----------------
| | By /s/ BEN HARPER
| |                  
| | Name: Ben Harper 

| |        |                                                      
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------
| | Title: | Senior Vice President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer
EXHIBIT 32.1



                                  CERTIFICATION
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     The undersigned, Louis J. Rampino, the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Fremont General Corporation (the "Company"), pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350, hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (i) the Quarterly Report, Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
     2004 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (ii) the financial statements and disclosures contained in the Report
     fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
     results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  November 8, 2004



                                       /s/  LOUIS J. RAMPINO
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Louis J. Rampino
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Eddie Earl BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-190.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
256 La. 823

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Vernell THOMPSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50812.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1970.

BARHAM, J., is of opinion the writ should be granted ordering an evidentiary hearing. See dissenting opinion.

BARHAM, Justice.

I am of the opinion that the writ should be granted ordering the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing. First, the fact that relator has other sentences to serve does not affect his right to be set at “liberty” from the sentence under attack if he shows merit under his complaint. “Liberty” as used in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 354 means liberty from the detention under the particular order or judgment alleged to be erroneous which acts as detainer of the relator. That an applicant may still be legally detained under other orders does not affect this right.

Second, the pleadings allege that when relator pleaded guilty, he did not have counsel and did not waive his right to counsel. The minutes and the record are silent in that regard. The writ cannot be denied under the “petition” and “attached documents”, as provided by Code of Criminal Procedure Article 354, and therefore a hearing is required on this issue. See my dissent from refusal to grant the writ in State ex rel. Johnson v. Henderson, No. 50824 on our docket, 256 La. 825, 239 So.2d 347.

As to relator’s claim under Mempa v. Rhay, 389 U.S. 128, 88 S.Ct. 254, 19 L.Ed.2d 336 (1967), for relief because of absence of counsel at a hearing on revocation of probation, see State ex rel. Shaw v. Henderson, No. 49607 on our docket, writs denied 253 La. 327, 218 So.2d 44, and Shaw v. Henderson, 430 F.2d 1116 (C.C.A. 5th 1970), which distinguished Mempa v. Rhay and found it inapplicable to Louisiana hearings on revocation of probation.
JeffMiller Testimonyon behalfofIBEW LU#S August 1, 2014 2:45pm My name is Jeffrey Miller. I am an Assistant Business Manager with IBEW Local Union #5 and am here speaking on behalf of its some 3500 members. I, as well as many others am here today because our members are concerned about the loss of their jobs dueto EPA's proposed Clean Power Plan.

I know that over the last few days you have heard repeated testimony on how the EPA's Clean Power Plan will undoubtedly attempt to clean toxins from our atmosphere while at the same time deal a crippling blow to our nation's economy by eliminating jobs that are directly intertwined with the production and use ofcoal. I do notwish to repeatthese national statisticsforyou again but I dowantto relay howthis plan will affectour members directly.

IBEW Local Union 

### # 5 has a jurisdiction that
covers 22 counties in Western Pennsylvania, approximately 1/3 of the Commonwealth. The 6 counties that I represent have approximately 300 journeypersons and apprentices living within its boundaries. These are IBEW workers with goodpaying jobs but more importantly they are IBEW workers with families. And mortgages. And car payments. And kids in school and college.

Also within this 6county, primarily rural, area are 4 active coal fired electrical generation facilities. Combined these plants produce 4,893 Mega Watts, nearly 5 Giga watts ofelectricity, supplying energyto tens of thousands of homes. This is just a small percentage of the power generated in the Eastern Appalachian Region and an even smaller percentage in the United States using coal as thefuel source.

Within this 6 county area IBEW Local #5 currently has over 125 of its members working on construction projects at several of these coal fired facilities. These projects include an SCR on two units and a Scrubber on another two units. Both projects involve workon the back pass ofthese units, in other words they are designed to clean emissions thus making these plants burn cleaner and more efficiently. 

### It will create electricity that is environmentally cleaner than before. These projects
are capital projects and are only part of the picture that our members play building them, there are also the many manhours created in maintaining theseplants with both scheduled and forced outages. The loss ofjobs created by the closure ofone or all ofthe stations due to more stringent coal regulations would be devastatingtotheworkforce ofthe IBEW.

The examples I havejustgiven are examples ofthe directimpactthatclosures ofcoal fired facilitieswould create. Ironically the livelihoods of our members, members belonging to the International Brotherhood of"Electrical"Workers completely revolve around the generation of electricity. In this great country, the United States ofAmerica. In the year 2014. We most assuredly have the intelligence and the technology to continue the use of, and even expand the use of COALas achiefsource ofour powergeneration.

o Thankyou