alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dale G. MEFFLEY, Appellant, v. Dorothy K. MEFFLEY, Appellee.

No. 73-1095.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 19, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stuart F. LaMotte, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Willie O’HARA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-539.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 6, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORP.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000936105
<NAME> ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           5,643
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,417)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,240
<PP&E>                                         877,582
<DEPRECIATION>                               (537,037)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 450,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,819
<BONDS>                                         60,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       263,537
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,454)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   450,889
<SALES>                                        315,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               315,335
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  228,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,839
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,885
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,878
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,007
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (60,441)
<CHANGES>                                      (1,020)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,454)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**PRAVCO, INC. AND NEW JERSEY**

**MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE**

**COMPANY**

**v.**

**WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (MARSHALL),** 

**PETITION OF: EDWARD MARSHALL :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 26 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 15th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION



### January 6, 2015

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Telephone Communications Related to Amendments in Direct Final Rule

FROM: Alan Stout, Engineer Assessment and Standards Division

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135

The table below describes my telephone communicatio ns with outside parties in the development of the rulemaking amendments that are part of the upcoming direct final rule.

7/31/2014 Bryan Wood-Thomas, U.S. Chamber of

Shipping, 202-589-1228 Draft amendments appear to be administrative/housek eeping. Seeking clarification about rationale for 1043 prov isions exempting domestic-only vessels from Annex VI NOx standards. 8/12/2014 Chris Nevers, Alliance of Automobile

Manufacturers, 248-794-5002 Some members have expressed concerns about like our DFRM changes to 86.101 for coastdowns. 8/20/2014 Bob Maxwell, Global Automakers, 734-

434-6664 Coastdown deliberations.

9/23/2014 Giedrius Ambrozaitis, Alliance of

Automobile Manufacturers 248-357-4796 Looking for changes to test fuel in §1065.710.  Latest round of changes is an incremental change. 9/23/2014 Bob Maxwell, Global Automakers, 734-

434-6664 Actual vs. projected sales for exhaust and evap pha se-ins.

9/24/2014 Bob Maxwell, Global Automakers, 734-

434-6664 No comments on latest round of draft amendments.

10/9/2014 Bob Maxwell, Global Automakers, 734-

434-6664 Tier 3 amendments – projected vs. actual sales, IUV P high-mileage vehicle, status, etc. 10/21/2014 Bob Maxwell, Global Automakers, 734-

434-6664 Touching base on the latest round of draft Tier 3 a mendments— cold testing coastdown, heater controls, and altitu de/FFV provisions. 10/24/2014 Giedrius Ambrozaitis, Alliance of

Automobile Manufacturers 248-357-4796 Timing for final drafts of Tier 3 amendments?  Expect one more draft in November. 10/27/2014 Steve Horetski, GM, 248-444-7286 I calle d to ask about GM practices for determining caniste r working capacity. They use lab air and would have to chang e if we specify a maximum purge humidity of 25 grains. 11/7/2014 Steve Horetski, GM, 248-444-7286 GM would like to avoid naming maximum fuel tank capacity on incomplete HDGV, since they generally design and/or install the tanks themselves. 11/10/2014 Marcus Loesch, Daimler Called with Mike Olechiw. Marcus expected this to be an issue for the Alliance/Global, not anything for Mercedes spec ifically. Klaus can confirm Daimler’s position.
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 30183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13788]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Multiple Study Data Coordinating 
Centers for Division of Intramural Population Health Research 
(DIPHR).
    Date: July 30, 2018.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6710 B Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review. National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, 
MD 20892, (301) 435-6680, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 21, 2018.
Michelle D. Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-13788 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 815

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore and increase the

deduction for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore

and increase the deduction for the health insurance costs

of self-employed individuals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS

4 OF SELF-EMPLOYED INDIVIDUALS IN5 CREASED AND MADE PERMANENT.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 162(l)

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special

8 rules for health insurance costs of self-employed individ9 uals) is amended by striking ‘‘25 percent’’ and inserting

10 ‘‘the applicable percentage’’.
2

•HR 815 IH

1 (b) DEDUCTION MADE PERMANENT; APPLICABLE

2 PERCENTAGE.—Paragraph (6) of section 162(l) of such

3 Code is amended to read as follows:

4 ‘‘(6) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE.—For purposes

5 of paragraph (1)—

In the case of taxable

years beginning in The applicable

calendar year: percentage is:

1992 or 1993 ............................................. 25 percent

1994 ........................................................... 40 percent

1995 ........................................................... 55 percent

1996 ........................................................... 70 percent

1997 ........................................................... 85 percent

1998 or thereafter ..................................... 100 percent.’’

6 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (a) of

7 section 110 of the Tax Extension Act of 1991 is amended

8 by striking paragraph (2).

9 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

11 December 31, 1991.

Æ
#### The CITY OF PENSACOLA, Florida, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant, v. William R. DAVENPORT, Appellee.

No. O-241.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 20, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)January 17, 2014(Date of earliest event reported)January 16, 2014





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---




Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn January 16, 2014, we announced that the board of directors of our general partner, ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C., approved a cash distribution of 73 cents per unit for the fourth quarter 2013.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 8.01Other EventsOn January 16, 2014, the board of directors of our general partner, ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C., approved a cash distribution of 73 cents per unit effective for the fourth quarter 2013. The fourth-quarter distribution is payable on February 14, 2014, to unitholders of record as of January 31, 2014.Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)ExhibitsExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated January 16, 2014.





2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:January 17, 2014By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer


3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated January 16, 2014.








4
<PAGE>



                                                                   June 30, 2001


Mr. Andris Gravitis
288 Mary Street
Oakville, Ontario L6K 3V4

Dear Mr. Gravitis:

     By letter agreement dated April 30, 2001, IVP Technology Corporation (the
"Company") agreed to settle the amount outstanding to you for services rendered
by June 28, 2001, the terms of which you agreed to by countersigning that letter
agreement. Since the date of that letter, the Company has not been able to
secure financing or other funds to satisfy its compensation obligations to you
in cash. Accordingly, as is the Company's right in that letter agreement, the
Company hereby satisfies its outstanding compensation obligation to you by
issuing 2,500,000 shares (the "Shares") of common stock registered on Form S-8
which shares are valued in the aggregate at approximately $200,000, based upon
the closing bid price per share on June 28, 2001.

     The actual amount of the proceeds you generate from the sale of the Shares
shall be deducted from the amount owed to you as of the date hereof.
Certificates evidencing the Shares will be delivered to you after the Shares
have been registered as described in the April 30, 2001 letter.



                                           Very truly yours,

                                           /s/ John Maxwell
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           John Maxwell
                                           President, IVP Technology Corporation
#### Charles HELLNER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-321.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 29, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 4.14
                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                            COVANTA CAPITAL TRUST III


     This Certificate of Trust of Covanta Capital Trust III (the "Trust"), is
being duly executed and filed by the undersigned trustee to form a business
trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C.ss. 3801 et seq.) (the
"Act").

     1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Covanta Capital
Trust III.

     2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the
Trust in the State of Delaware are Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square
North, 1100 N. Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attention:
Corporate Trust Administration.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Trust
in accordance with Section 3811 of the Act.

                                      WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its
                                      individual capacity but solely as Trustee



                                      By: /s/ W. Thomas Morris, II
                                         ______________________________________
                                           Name:  W. Thomas Morris, II
                                           Title: Administrative Account Manager
Reviewing Draft Reports and Providing Effective Feedback

(8 hours)

Course Overview

The process of moving from a draft report to a high quality and timely final product can be 

challenging for reviewers and report writers. Yet report findings must be communicated clearly 

and on time to be useful to agencies and policy makers. Using lecture, carefully designed 

exercises, short video clips, and class discussion, this highly interactive course provides practical 

techniques for reviewing drafts and providing effective feedback that can expedite revisions, 

result in a high quality product, and help improve staff report writing skills. This course is 

offered over 2 half days.

CPEs: 8

Who Should Attend

This course is designed to help federal, state, or local government auditors understand and 

employ specific techniques and principles to improve their report review skills and more 

effectively communicate their feedback. The course sharpens the skills of both auditors and

supervisors in reviewing their own and others’ drafts to identify and resolve issues and improve 

report clarity. It also focuses on how reviewers can best provide feedback to audit team 

members, team members can most effectively respond to feedback, and reviewers and team 

members can collaborate in making report revisions to expedite the completion of a highquality draft. The course is suited for audit team members as well as supervisors.

Course Objectives

Participants will be able to

• Understand and employ methods for reviewing drafts efficiently and effectively to expedite 

revisions and achieve a high-quality draft

• Recognize common problems with report drafts and utilize approaches for solving them

• Provide and receive constructive feedback that will keep the writer engaged, result in a highquality draft, and further develop staff report writing skills

Course Topics

Goals and Expectations of Report Reviewers and Writers

• Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards requirements for report quality and 

timeliness

• Expectations and realities for report reviewers 

• Expectations and realities for report writers
Reviewing Drafts Efficiently and Effectively

• Reading draft reports with professional skepticism

• Understanding personal reviewing style

• Reviewing drafts using an organized approach (e.g., thinking about potential sensitivity of 

the issues covered, experience level of writer, status of draft product, time available for 

review and revisions)

• Applying structured reading techniques for reviewing drafts (e.g., checking for message, 

linkage, and logic flow; focusing initially on higher-order concerns)

Providing Constructive Feedback

• Key feedback principles

• Importance of promoting buy-in and product ownership

• Using feedback as a coaching tool

• Promoting a proactive focus on revisions

• Role-playing both providing and responding to constructive feedback
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                7
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000
<CURRENCY>                                     USD
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                11,277
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                    0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                      0
<EQUITIES>                                              25
<MORTGAGE>                                               0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                            0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                      12,598
<CASH>                                                 984
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                       0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                                 341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      16,519
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                          0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                      0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                      12,504
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                    0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                        486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                             15
<COMMON>                                                 1
<OTHER-SE>                                           1,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        16,519
<PREMIUMS>                                               0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                    821
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                       2
<OTHER-INCOME>                                         394
<BENEFITS>                                               0
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                             69
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                   328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        179
<INCOME-TAX>                                            54
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        (10)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           115
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         2.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2.42
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                           0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                      0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                        0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                       0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                         0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                          0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                                  0
        

</TABLE>