alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 815 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 815

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore and increase the 
 deduction for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1993

   Mr. Barrett of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore and increase the 
 deduction for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS OF SELF-EMPLOYED 
              INDIVIDUALS INCREASED AND MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 162(l) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rules for health insurance 
costs of self-employed individuals) is amended by striking ``25 
percent'' and inserting ``the applicable percentage''.
    (b) Deduction Made Permanent; Applicable Percentage.--Paragraph (6) 
of section 162(l) of such Code is amended to read as follows:
            ``(6) Applicable percentage.--For purposes of paragraph 
        (1)--

                    In the case of taxable
                                                                       
                      years beginning in
                                                         The applicable
                      calendar year:
                                                         percentage is:
                            1992 or 1993.............        25 percent
                            1994.....................        40 percent
                            1995.....................        55 percent
                            1996.....................        70 percent
                            1997.....................        85 percent
                            1998 or thereafter.......    100 percent.''
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (a) of section 110 of the Tax 
Extension Act of 1991 is amended by striking paragraph (2).
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1991.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 15



Zenex International, Inc.
14220 S. Meridian Ave.
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73173


We have reviewed, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of
Zenex International, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2005 and for the
periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, as indicated in our report dated August 5,
2005; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which was included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-70453 (2003 on Form
S-8, and in Registration Statement No. 333-101520 on Form S-8.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections
7 and 11 of that Act.




/s/Sutton Robinson Freeman & Co., P.C.

Sutton Robinson Freeman & Co., P.C.
Certified Public Accountants
August 15, 2005
Tulsa, OK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Federal Trade Commission

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

1

Statement of the Federal Trade Commission

on the Proposed Repeal of the Care Labeling Rule

July 21, 2021

On July 23, 2020, the Federal Trade Commission published a proposal to repeal the Care 

Labeling Rule, which gives families information on how to properly care for apparel and other 

goods. There was little support for the repeal of the rule. The Commission will continue to 

consider ways to improve the Care Labeling Rule, but has determined it will not finalize the 

repeal as proposed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 848

To continue the authorization of appropriations for the East Court of the

National Museum of Natural History.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1993

Mr. MINETA (for himself, Mr. NATCHER, and Mr. MCDADE) introduced the

following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on House Administration and Public Works and Transportation

A BILL

To continue the authorization of appropriations for the East

Court of the National Museum of Natural History.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2 of the Act entitled ‘‘An

5 Act to authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian

6 Institution to plan, design, construct, and equip space in

7 the East Court of the National Museum of Natural His8 tory building, and for other purposes’’, approved October

9 24, 1990 (20 U.S.C. 50 note), is amended by inserting

10 ‘‘and succeeding fiscal years’’ after ‘‘1991’’.
2

HR 848 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 subsection (a) shall take effect as of October 24, 1990.

Æ
Exhibit 31(a)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (15 U.S.C. § 7241)

I, Pierre-Olivier Beckers, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Delhaize America, Inc.;

2) Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4) The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 15, 2006



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Pierre-Olivier Beckers
|Pierre-Olivier Beckers    
|Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Dr. Jack SOLOMON, Relator, v. Dr. David P. SLOAN, Jr., Dr. Frank J. Altieri, Dr. Edward K. Walker, Dr. B. E. Tedeson, and Dr. Frank S. Finger, as constituting the Florida State Board of Optometry, Respondents.

No. 70-440.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 29, 1970.

Cushman & Cushman, John W. Prunty, Miami, for relator.

Edward P. Swan, Miami, for respondents.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Relator, a licensed optometrist, has filed in this court a suggestion for the issuance of a writ of prohibition against Florida State Board of Optometry and each and every member thereof to restrain the Board from proceeding with a hearing on charges that could result in the suspension or revocation of relator’s license.

The suggestion is premised on the assertion that each and every member of the Board is prejudiced against the relator and unable to grant him a fair hearing because the complaining witnesses were investigators employed by the Board. Thus relator in essence attacks the method by which the Board supervises and regulates the practice of the profession of optometry in this state.

After reviewing the affidavits and hearing argument in this cause, we hold that relator has failed to make a prima facie showing for the relief he seeks. The affidavits herein are insufficient as a matter of law because they assert conclusions that the relator is unable to receive a fair hearing without stating facts from which such a conclusion could be reached. The assertions in relator’s affidavit do not afford a basis in reason or common sense- for a conclusion that the Board members are prejudiced against relator and will not give him a fair hearing. Cf. City of Palatka v. Frederick, 128 Fla. 366, 174 So. 826 (1937).

The suggestion for writ of prohibition is denied.

It is so ordered.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 595

To amend title 32, United States Code, to provide that performance of

honor guard functions at funerals for veterans by members of the National Guard may be recognized as a Federal function for National

Guard purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. KANJORSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 32, United States Code, to provide that

performance of honor guard functions at funerals for

veterans by members of the National Guard may be

recognized as a Federal function for National Guard

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 595 IH

1 SECTION 1. FEDERAL STATUS OF SERVICE BY NATIONAL

2 GUARD MEMBERS AS HONOR GUARDS AT FU3 NERALS OF VETERANS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Chapter 1 of title 32, United

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow6 ing new section:

7 ‘‘§ 113. Honor guard functions at funerals for veter8 ans

9 ‘‘Subject to such restrictions as may be prescribed by

10 the Secretary concerned, the performance of honor guard

11 functions by members of the National Guard at funerals

12 for veterans of the armed forces may be treated by the

13 Secretary concerned as a Federal function for which ap14 propriated funds may be used. Any such performance of

15 honor guard functions at funerals may not be considered

16 to be a period of drill or training otherwise required.’’.

17 (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such

18 chapter is amended by adding at the end the following

19 new item:

‘‘113. Honor guard functions at funerals for veterans.’’.

20 (b) FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993.—Section 113

21 of title 32, United States Code, as added by subsection

22 (a), does not authorize additional appropriations for fiscal

23 year 1993. Any expenses of the National Guard by reason

24 of such section during fiscal year 1993 may be paid from

25 existing appropriations available for the National Guard.
3

•HR 595 IH

Æ
# Official Journal C 253/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.253.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 253 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5321 September 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.253.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 253

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5321 September 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 253/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 253/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 253/02 | Notice of initiation of a partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of China | 2 |
| 2010/C 253/03 | Planned closure of complaint CHAP 2010/19 | 5 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 253/04 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

European Commission

2010/C 253/02

Notice of initiation of a partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of China

2

2010/C 253/03

Planned closure of complaint CHAP 2010/19

5

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2010/C 253/04

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs

6

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          37,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,316,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   752,000
<INVENTORY>                                     55,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,208,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,161,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,879,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,414,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,132,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,161,000
<SALES>                                        796,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               796,000
<CGS>                                          426,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  426,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               288,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              77,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.004
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 651 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 651

 To amend the National and Community Service Act of 1990 to authorize 
 appropriations for the Civilian Community Corps Demonstration Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 1993

   Mr. English of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National and Community Service Act of 1990 to authorize 
 appropriations for the Civilian Community Corps Demonstration Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 195N of the National and Community Service 
Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12653n), as added by section 1092(a) of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 
102-484; 106 Stat. 2522), is amended--
            (1) by striking out ``The Commission,'' and inserting in 
        lieu thereof ``(b) Funding Limitation.--Notwithstanding section 
        501(2)(D), the Commission,''; and
            (2) by inserting below the section heading the following 
        new subsection:
    ``(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--For fiscal year 1994 and 
each subsequent fiscal year, there is authorized to be appropriated for 
the Civilian Community Corps Demonstration Program established pursuant 
to section 195A such sums as may be necessary to carry out the 
program.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendments.--(1) The heading of such section is 
amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 195N. FUNDING MATTERS.''.

    (2) The item relating to such section in the table of contents in 
section 1(b) of the National and Community Service Act of 1990 (Public 
Law 101-610; 104 Stat. 3127) is amended to read as follows:

``195N. Funding matters.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kenneth SKIDMORE and John J. Bowes.

No. 61993.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus and stay order. Parish of Orleans.

Denied.

SUMMERS, J., would grant the writ.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 790 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 790

To provide for the termination of further production of the Trident II 
                             (D-5) missile.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1993

  Mr. Penny introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the termination of further production of the Trident II 
                             (D-5) missile.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Trident II (D-5) Missile Production 
Termination Act''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF NEW PRODUCTION OF TRIDENT II (D-5) MISSILES.

    (a) Production Termination.--Funds appropriated for the Department 
of Defense for fiscal years after fiscal year 1993 may not be obligated 
or expended to commence production of additional Trident II (D-5) 
missiles.
    (b) Authorized Scope of Trident II (D-5) Program.--Amounts 
appropriated for the Department of Defense may be expended for the 
Trident II (D-5) missile program only for the completion of production 
of those Trident II (D-5) missiles which were commenced with funds 
appropriated for a fiscal year before fiscal year 1994.

                                 <all>
```
#### STERLING NATIONAL BANK OF DAVIE, Appellant, v. GLENS FALLS INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellees.

No. 71-18.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 16, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
VI

Calendar No. 690

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 810

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 3 (legislative day, JULY 20), 1994

Received

AUGUST 5, 1994

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported by Mr. BIDEN, without amendment

AN ACT

For the relief of Elizabeth M. Hill.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED

4 STATES.

5 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any

6 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to

7 Elizabeth M. Hill—

8 (1) the sum of $6,780, and

9 (2) interest on such sum—
2

•HR 810 RS

1 (A) calculated at the rate determined in

2 the manner provided in subsections (a) and (b)

3 of section 1961 of title 28, United States Code,

4 and

5 (B) payable for the period beginning on

6 October 5, 1985, and ending on the date on

7 which such sum is paid.

8 Such sum represents the amount that was recovered by

9 the United States under Public Law 87–693 (76 Stat.

10 593; 42 U.S.C. 2651 et seq.) in satisfaction of its claim

11 against a tortiously liable third person for the value of

12 medical care and treatment the United States furnished

13 to Elizabeth M. Hill, but would have been recovered by

14 Elizabeth M. Hill if a timely request for a waiver of such

15 claim had been submitted on her behalf.

16 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY’S AND AGENT’S FEES.

17 Not more than 10 percent of the sums appropriated

18 by section 1 shall be paid to or received by any agent or

19 attorney for services rendered in connection with the claim

20 described in such section. Any person who violates this

21 section shall be fined not more than $1,000.

Passed the House of Representatives August 2,

1994.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 690

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 810

AN ACT

For the relief of Elizabeth M. Hill.

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported without amendment