alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,167,147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  903,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,220,309
<PP&E>                                       1,480,746
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,861,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,411,607
<BONDS>                                        996,591
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,233
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,007,335)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,861,008
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,792,157
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,584,991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,960,268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             581,808
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,334,910)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,334,910)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Richard H. PRICE, as District Supervisor of the Division of Youth Service of the State of Florida, Relator, v. Honorable Gordon A. DUNCAN, Jr., and Honorable Clifford B. Shepard, Jr., Circuit Judges of the Fourth Judicial Circuit in and for Duval County in the Juvenile Division of said Court, Respondents.

No. 43614.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 27, 1973.

*423Chester G. Senf, Jacksonville, for relator.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Andrew W. Lindsey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.

CARLTON, Chief Justice.

In this original proceeding, relator, by way of petition for writ of mandamus, seeks to require the respondent Circuit Court judges to take jurisdiction of juvenile cases involving “children in need of supervision”, as defined in Fla.Stat. § 39.-01(10) (a), F.S.A. Respondents have refused to exercise such jurisdiction because Fla.Stat. § 39.02(1)(a), F.S.A., provides that, “The juvenile court shall have exclusive original jurisdiction of dependent and delinquent children . . . ” and does not mention the third class of children — those in need of supervision — which is defined and dealt with in Chapter 39. We are of the opinion, nevertheless, that Chapter 39 clearly confers jurisdiction over all three classes in the Circuit Court.

Article V, Section 5(b), Florida Constitution, F.S.A., gives the Circuit Court “original jurisdiction not vested in the county courts . . . . ” Since there is no general law giving county courts jurisdiction over cases involving children in need of supervision, it must lie in the Circuit Courts.

The original jurisdiction of the Circuit Courts is set out in Fla.Stat. § 26.012(2), F.S.A., as being, inter alia:

> (a) In all actions at law not cognizable by the county courts;

and

> (c) In all cases in equity including all cases relating to juveniles [except traffic offenses as provided in chapters 39 and 316;]. (Brackets added.)

The brackets were added above to emphasize that the “as provided” clause in subsection (c) relates to the traffic exception, not to the phrase, “including all cases relating to juveniles”.

Nevertheless, Chapter 39, when taken as a whole, clearly evidences a Legislative intent that the Circuit Courts have jurisdiction of all of the types of juvenile cases established therein. We decline, however, to detail here all the provisions of Chapter 39 which lead to this conclusion. Such a justification is not necessary, since, as noted above, there is no general law vesting jurisdiction of these cases in the county courts. Under our Constitution, if the Legislature recognizes a class of cases or creates a cause of action without specifying which of our two levels of trial court has jurisdiction, that jurisdiction automatically lies in the Circuit Courts.

Accordingly, the peremptory writ is issued, and respondents shall henceforth exercise their jurisdiction in all cases filed by relator involving children in need of supervision.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.01**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Wehave issued our report dated December 06, 2005, accompanying theconsolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of VersantCorporation on Form 10-KSB for the year ended October 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in thepreviously filed Registration Statements of Versant Corporation on Form S-8(File Nos. 333-67776, 333-87922, 333-107956, 333-113871, 333-125368, and 333-130601).

 
| /s/  GRANT THORNTON LLP |
|-------------------------|
| January  25, 2006       |
| San  Francisco, CA      |

 

----
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Albert W. Aspenleiter, as Administrator of the Estate of Albert J. Aspenleiter, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Monroe County,

July 31, 1952.

*Russell A. Sibley*for administrator, petitioner.

*Joseph B. Boyle*and *Matthew Kowalski*for Jesse B. Hannan, as Director of Public Welfare of the County of Monroe, respondent.

*Harold F. Curtis,*special guardian for Katherine Bates, an alleged incompetent, respondent.

*110Wither, S.

In this judicial settlement proceeding the claimant, Jesse B. Hannan, as Director of Public Welfare of the County of Monroe, seeks to recover the sum of $4,965.54 against this estate to reimburse the county for funds advanced for the support of the decedent’s wife in his lifetime. It is conceded that during the period that the county gave the assistance to the decedent’s wife, the decedent was without assets with which to support the wife, but thereafter he inherited the funds part of which are involved in this account. It is for that reason and in reliance upon *Hodson*v. *Stapleton*(248 App. Div. 524) and *Matter of Moore*(277 App. Div. 471) and cases of like import, that the petitioner and the special guardian contend that the estate has no liability to the claim herein.

If the liability of the deceased rested upon subdivision 1 of section 101 of the Social Welfare Law, the holding of the above-cited cases would be applicable and controlling. However, at common law and wholly apart from said section of the Social Welfare Law a husband was liable and still is liable for the reasonable support of his wife and children. *(Fuller*v. *Galeota,*271 App. Div. 155.) The principle derived, it may be assumed, from public policy, as stated in the *Hodson*and *Moore*cases *(supra)*has no application in the case of the obligation of a husband to support his wife or children. The common-law liability of the husband did not and does not depend upon his ability to pay at the time when the services were furnished. *(Matter of Kane*v. *Necci,*245 App. Div. 1; *Betz*v. *Horr,*250 App. Div. 457.)

The claim is, therefore, allowed in full.

Submit decree accordingly.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Jeffrey L. Wright, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of G&K Services, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. G&K Services, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for G&K Services, Inc., and have:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to G&K Services, Inc., including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of G&K Services, Inc.’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this report any change in G&K Services, Inc.’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during G&K Services, Inc.’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, G&K Services,Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting;5. G&K Services, Inc.’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to G&K Services, Inc.’s auditors andthe audit committee of G&K Services, Inc.’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectG&K Services, Inc.’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in G&K Services, Inc.’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: November 4, 2005         By:               /s/ Jeffrey L. Wright    Jeffrey L. Wright, Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 693 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 693

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to provide additional studies 
                   and investigations at Crater Lake.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 1993

Mr. Smith of Oregon (for himself, Mr. Wyden, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Kopetski, 
and Ms. Furse) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to provide additional studies 
                   and investigations at Crater Lake.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Crater Lake Water Quality Study Act 
of 1993''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) Crater Lake is the deepest caldera lake in the world;
            (2) the lake constitutes the principal reason for the 
        establishment of Crater Lake as a unit of the National Park 
        System;
            (3) research indicating an apparent reduction in the 
        clarity of the lake lead Congress to require a 10-year study of 
        the lake in 1982;
            (4) the results of this study indicate that lake attributes 
        are dynamic and sensitive to changing environmental conditions; 
        and
            (5) understanding the cyclic phenomena will require 
        additional study and long term monitoring.

SEC. 3. STUDY OF CRATER LAKE WATER QUALITY.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior shall continue studies 
and investigations begun under Public Law 97-250 to determine the 
status and trends of change of the water quality of Crater Lake. The 
Secretary shall immediately implement such actions as may be necessary 
to assure the retention of the natural pristine water quality of Crater 
Lake.
    (b) Report.--Within 2 years after the date of enactment of this 
Act, and biennially thereafter for the 10-year period beginning on the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit a report 
of the results of such studies and investigations, and any 
implementation actions initiated, to the appropriate committees of the 
Congress.

SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act 
$160,000 for fiscal year 1994 and each of the 9 fiscal years 
thereafter.

                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal L 112/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 112 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 612 May 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 112

English edition

Legislation

Volume 612 May 2018

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2018/643 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 April 2018 on rail transport statistics | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2018/644 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 April 2018 on cross-border parcel delivery services (
  1
  ) | 19 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Directive (EU) 2018/645 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 April 2018 amending Directive 2003/59/EC on the initial qualification and periodic training of drivers of certain road vehicles for the carriage of goods or passengers and Directive 2006/126/EC on driving licences (
  1
  ) | 29 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2018/646 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 April 2018 on a common framework for the provision of better services for skills and qualifications (Europass) and repealing Decision No 2241/2004/EC (
  1
  ) | 42 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2018/643 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 April 2018 on rail transport statistics

1

*

Regulation (EU) 2018/644 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 April 2018 on cross-border parcel delivery services (
  1
  )

1

19

DIRECTIVES

*

Directive (EU) 2018/645 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 April 2018 amending Directive 2003/59/EC on the initial qualification and periodic training of drivers of certain road vehicles for the carriage of goods or passengers and Directive 2006/126/EC on driving licences (
  1
  )

1

29

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2018/646 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 April 2018 on a common framework for the provision of better services for skills and qualifications (Europass) and repealing Decision No 2241/2004/EC (
  1
  )

1

42

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,396
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (8,835)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,695
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,619
<PP&E>                                          80,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                (34,335)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 369,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,506
<BONDS>                                         86,376
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           146
<OTHER-SE>                                     174,863
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   369,355
<SALES>                                         24,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               354,811
<CGS>                                           16,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  297,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (271)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,326
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,001
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,001
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,001
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.60


</TABLE>
#### STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Thru SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY, etc. et al. v. Louis J. ANTHONY et al.

No. 54524.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 5, 1974.

In re: Louis J. Anthony; et al., applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 289 So.2d 279.

Writ denied. The result below, in the matter here before us, is correct.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4115

_____________________________
M ARILYN B OWEN G RIFFIN , as Personal Representative for the Estate o f James C. Bowen
, Appellant,

v.

F AS C APITAL , LLC, a Georgia Limited Liability Company
, Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Adrian G. Soud , Judge

. June 28, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , R AY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

James H. Post of Smith, Hulsey & Busel, Jacksonvill e , for Appellant.

Michael Fox Orr and Joseph D. Pickles of the Law Offices of Dawson & Orr, Jacksonville
, for Appellee.
#### Jerry WINSTEAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Adrian NICHOLS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 3696.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Dec. 2, 1971.

Ford & Nugent by Howard N. Nugent, Jr., Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant.

Gravel, Roy & Burnes by James N. Small, Alexandria, for defendant-appellee.

Before CULPEPPER, MILLER and DOMENGEAUX, JJ.

MILLER, Judge.

Plaintiff Jerry Winstead appealed the trial court’s judgment dismissing this suit at his costs. Appellant did not file a brief in this court and failed to appear when the case was called for argument.

The appeal was therefore abandoned and is hereby dismissed at plaintiff’s costs. See Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, Rule VII, Section 5(b). Johnson v. Sayes, 231 So.2d 651 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1970).

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 23.1





INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-134234 and 333-134233) on Form S-8 pertaining to the Stock Option Plan of CareAdvantage, Inc. and the Directors’ Stock Option Plan of CareAdvantage, Inc. of our report dated April 19, 2011, which included an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, with respect to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of CareAdvantage, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.




/s/ EisnerAmper, LLP





Edison, New Jersey


April 19, 2011
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                               September 25, 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Frank's Nursery
Crafts, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended August 11, 2002 (the
"Report"), as filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, the undersigned, Alan J. Minker, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
such officer's knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  expressed in the Report.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as
of the date first above written.

                                                     /s/ Alan J. Minker
                                                     ------------------
                                                     Alan J. Minker
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
#### STANDARD EQUITY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. STANDARD EQUITY COMPANY, INC., a corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-38.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.