alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 758

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to provide

duty-free status for hosiery knitting machines and parts thereof, and

for hosiery knitting needles.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1993

Mr. BALLENGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United

States to provide duty-free status for hosiery knitting

machines and parts thereof, and for hosiery knitting

needles.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HOSIERY KNITTING MACHINES AND PARTS

4 AND HOSIERY KNITTING NEEDLES.

5 The following subheadings of chapter 84 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States are each

7 amended by striking any rate appearing in the Special col-
2

•HR 758 IH

1 umn and by striking the rate appearing in the General

2 column and inserting ‘‘Free’’:

3 (1) Subheading 8447.11.10 (relating to circular

4 knitting machines with cylinder diameter not exceed5 ing 165 mm, for knitting hosiery).

6 (2) Subheading 8447.12.10 (relating to circular

7 knitting machines with cylinder diameter exceeding

8 165 mm, for knitting hosiery).

9 (3) Subheading 8447.20.60 (relating to flat

10 knitting machines and stitch-bonding machines other

11 than V-bed flat knitting machines and warp knitting

12 machines).

13 (4) Subheading 8448.51.10 (relating to latch

14 needles for knitting machines).

15 (5) Subheading 8448.51.30 (relating to needles

16 for knitting machines other than latch needles and

17 spring-beard needles).

18 (6) Subheading 8448.59.10 (relating to certain

19 parts of knitting machines).

20 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

21 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by section

22 1 shall apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn

23 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the fifteenth

24 day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
3

•HR 758 IH

1 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec2 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

3 of law to the contrary, upon a request filed with the appro4 priate customs officer before the 90th day after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal from

6 warehouse for consumption of goods to which any amend7 ment made by section 1 applies and that was made—

8 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

9 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en10 actment of this Act;

11 and with respect to which there would have been a lower

12 duty if any amendment made by section 1 had applied to

13 such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated or

14 reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal had oc15 curred on such 15th day.

Æ
#### R & G PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. Gertrude ROTHBARD, Respondent.

No. 41026.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 10, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 244 So.2d 538.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40235 Summary Calendar

NORMAN LEWIS EVERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL McCLELLAND, JR., Correctional Officer; C. JENNINGS, Correctional Officer; ALTON D. CASKEY, Associate Warden, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CV-178

- - - - - - - - - - July 26, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Norman Lewis Evers, #42209, appeals from the dismissal of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. Evers contends that

defendant McClelland harassed him and r etaliated against him by

singling himout for strip searches, insulting him racially,

ransackin g his cell, taking his personal and legal property, and

denying him the opportunity to eat one meal; that defendant

Jennings wrote a false disciplinary charge agains t him and

retaliated against him for filing a grievance by destroying hisfamily photographs; and that defendant Caskey failed to investigate

his grievances against McClel land or Jennings or to remedy their

misdeeds.

Evers did not raise his contentions regarding strip searches

or racial insults in the district court; his contentions provide us

with no basis for finding plain error. R obertson v. Plano City of

Texas , 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1995). The denial of one meal is

a de minim is injury that does not give rise to a constitutional

violation. S ee Ammons v. Baldwin , 705 F.2d 1445, 1448 (5th Cir.

1983), cert. denied

, 465 U.S. 1006 (1984). We find Evers’s appeal

from the dismissal of his remaining claims against McClelland, and

all of his claims agai nst defendant Jennings, frivolous for

essentially the reasons relied upon by the district court. Evers

v. McClelland

, No. 6:95-CV-178 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 27, 1995). Evers

has not provided facts indicating a nonfrivolous contention that

defendant Caskey’s alleged failure to rule in Caskey’s favor on his

g rievances against McClelland and Jennings was responsible for

Mc Clelland’s and Jennings’s actions. S ee Bowen v. Watkins

, 669

F.2d 979, 988 (5th Cir. 1982).

Fin ally, we caution Evers that any additional frivolous

appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To

avoid sanctions, Evers is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous because they previously have been decided by this court.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 5 T H C IR

. R. 42.2. SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORP.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>        0000936105
<NAME>       ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,591
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,278
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,501
<INVENTORY>                                      2,006
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,913
<PP&E>                                         896,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                 566,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 415,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,783
<BONDS>                                         62,872
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       263,537
<OTHER-SE>                                    (32,463)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   415,916
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               321,838
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  250,320
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,304
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,109
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,169
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             42,940
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (6,949)
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,991
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal L 279I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 279I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6231 October 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 279I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6231 October 2019

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2019/1795 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2019 amending Regulations (EU) 2019/501 and (EU) 2019/502 as regards their periods of application (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2019/1796 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014-2020) | 4 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2019/1797 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2019 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2403 as regards fishing authorisations for Union fishing vessels in United Kingdom waters and fishing operations of United Kingdom fishing vessels in Union waters | 7 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2019/1795 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2019 amending Regulations (EU) 2019/501 and (EU) 2019/502 as regards their periods of application (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Regulation (EU) 2019/1796 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014-2020)

4

*

Regulation (EU) 2019/1797 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2019 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2403 as regards fishing authorisations for Union fishing vessels in United Kingdom waters and fishing operations of United Kingdom fishing vessels in Union waters

7

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Decision 2019/1798of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 October 2019 appointing the European Chief Prosecutor of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office ( OJ L 274, 28.10.2019 ) | 11 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Decision 2019/1798of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 October 2019 appointing the European Chief Prosecutor of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office ( OJ L 274, 28.10.2019 )

( OJ L 274, 28.10.2019 )

11

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
263 La. 372

#### Charles STEIN et al. v. The TOWN OF LAFITTE et al. Calvin A. FLEMING et al. v. The TOWN OF LAFITTE et al.

No. 52950.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 16, 1972.

In re: The Town of Lafitte, Leo Ker-ner, Jr., Quentin Couevas, Alvro G. Des-paux, Lawrence Cheramie, Paul Robeaux and Paul Romagasse applying for Certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 266 So.2d 516.

Writ denied. No error of law.

McCALEB, C. J., and BARHAM, J., are of the opinion the writ should be granted.
Feather River Air Quality Management District

PUBLIC HEARING ON THE S TATE I MPLEMENTATION P LAN SUBMITTAL : District Rules 2.0

– Open Burning and 3.17

– Wood Heating Devices
Public Hearing Date: February 3, 2014

Public Comments
There have been no public comments received to date.
#### Maurice BENJAMIN, Appellant, v. Mollie BENJAMIN, Appellee.

No. 70-1253.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 13, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal quashed.
#### Lillie Mae CRAWFORD, Appellant-Petitioner, v. Samuel BARON and Ethel Baron, Appellees-Respondents.

Nos. 70-1086, 70-1113.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 23, 1971.

Charles J. Bodner, Miami, for appellant-petitioner.

Smith, Mandler, Smith & Parker, Miami Beach, for appellees-respondents.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

An interlocutory appeal and a petition for a writ of certiorari were consolidated for argument and opinion.

In the interlocutory appeal the appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying her request for a jury trial. We agree and reverse with directions that she be granted a jury trial as heretofore determined by this court in Crawford v. Baron, Fla.App.1970, 238 So.2d 311.

In her petition for a writ of certiorari she objects to that portion of the lower court’s order which directs plaintiff’s foreclosure action (based on the original note and second mortgage only) to be set down as a non-jury trial. We find that petitioner’s objection has merit. It appears from the record that appellee had agreed to the entry of an order requiring that the entire cause be placed on the calendar for trial by jury. Accordingly, certiorari is granted and that portion of the order directing that the case be set down and tried without a jury is quashed.

It is so ordered.
AGEN-Exhibit10.8






Exhibit 10.8
SCHEDULE TO INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT


The following is a list of the current and former directors and executive officers of Agenus who are party to an Indemnification Agreement, the form of which was filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-91747):


Noubar Afeyan, Ph.D.
Garo H. Armen, Ph.D.
Frank V. AtLee III
Ozer Baysal
Brian Corvese
Gamil G. de Chadarevian
Tom Dechaene
Margaret Eisen
Renu Gupta
John Hatsopoulos
Wadih Jordan
Mark Kessel
Christine Klaskin
Bruce Leicher
Hyam Levitsky
Timothy Rothwell
Shalini Sharp
Pramod K. Srivastava, Ph.D.
Robert Stein
Peter Thornton
Karen Valentine
Kerry Wentworth
Alastair Wood
Timothy Wright
EE-RM-TP-99-470 COMMENT 01B

PRELIMINARY AGENDA 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEW ABLE ENERGY 

PUBLIC HEARING ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS 

FOR COMMERCIAL PACKAGED BOILERS, AND COMMERCIAL WATER 

HEATERS, HOT WATER SUPPLY BOILERS AND UNFIRED HOT WATER 

STORAGE TANKS 

PLACE OF HEARING: 

DATE AND TIME: 

PURPOSE OF THE HEARING 

FORREST AL BUILDING 

1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, SW 

ROOM 1E-245 

WASHINGTON, DC 20585 

TELEPHONE: 202/586-9127 

TELEFAX: 202/586-4617 

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20,2000 

9:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. 

The purpose of this public hearing is to hear the views of interested persons on the 

proposed requirements for commercial packaged boilers, and commercial water heaters, 

hot water supply boilers, and unfired hot water storage tanks. The Department will 

consider the views presented and comments submitted in formulating a final rule. 

I. OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS 

II. AGENDA REVIEW 

ffi. COMMERCIAL PACKAGED BOILERS - TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION 

A. General Statements 

B. Definition and Scope of Coverage 

1. Method of Shipment and Assembly 

2. Boiler Application 

3. Boiler Capacity 

4. Boiler Operation 

C. Test Procedures for the Measurement of Energy Efficiency 

1. Test Procedure and Test Conditions for Low Pressure Boilers 

2. Test Procedure and Test Conditions for High Pressure Boilers 

3. Boilers Designed for Low Water Temperature Applications 
EE-RM-TP-99-470 COMMENT 01B

• I 

4. Condensing Boilers 

5. Modular Boilers and Multiple Boilers 

6. Testing and Rating a Steam and Hot Water Boiler 

D. Other Topics 

IV. COMMERCIAL WATER HEATERS, HOT WATER SUPPLY BOILERS AND 

UNFIRED HOT WATER STORAGE TANKS - TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION 

A. General Statements 

B. Definitions and Coverage 

1. Instantaneous Water Heaters 

2. Hot Water Supply Boilers 

3. Heat Pump Water Heaters 

4. Waste Heat Recovery Water Heaters 

C. Test Procedures for the Measurement of Energy Efficiency 

1. Gas-fired Water Heaters 

2. Oil-fired Water Heaters 

3. Electric Water Heaters 

D. Unfired Hot Water Storage Tanks 

1. Exemption from and application of Maximum Heat Loss Requirement 

2. Unfired Hot Water Storage Tank Test Procedure 

E. Other Topics 

v. ADJOURNMENT
Feather River Air Quality Management District

PUBLIC HEARING ON THE STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN SUBMITTAL: District 

Rules 2.0 – Open Burning and 3.17 – Wood Heating Devices

Public Hearing Date: February 3, 2014

Public Comments

There have been no public comments received to date.
| (1)   | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period      ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of MedClean Technologies,      Inc. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 20, 2010       |   | /s/      David      Laky     |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                                                           |   | David      Laky              |   |
|                                                           |   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|                                                           |   |                         |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
RAVENSWOOD  WINERY,  INC. APPENDIX A TO ITEM 601(C) OF REGULATION S-B COMMERCIAL
AND INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          5,769,373
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,176,816
<ALLOWANCES>                                       10,000
<INVENTORY>                                    20,521,284
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               30,835,104
<PP&E>                                         17,569,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,781,481
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 46,173,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,323,001
<BONDS>                                         6,537,004
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                       15,054,373
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,176,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   46,173,090
<SALES>                                        33,226,137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               33,226,137
<CGS>                                          15,696,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   7,735,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                861,992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 9,204,270
<INCOME-TAX>                                    3,366,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             5,838,170
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    5,838,170
<EPS-BASIC>                                          1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.19



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.6

 Agreement of High Tech regarding 18 month period to rescind certain purchases


                            CONFIRMATION OF AGREEMENT

         When High Tech Travel Services Corporation sold shares of its common
stock to various United States persons during the period from October 1, 1999 to
March 31, 2000, it promised some of those persons that they would have the
right, for an eighteen month period from their respective date of purchase of
their shares, to ask for a return of their investments in exchange for their
shares. We hereby extend that offer to all of the U.S. persons who purchased
shares during that period and who will be receiving a rescission offer with
respect to their purchases. This written statement is intended to confirm our
oral agreement and is intended to be for the benefit of and may be relied on by
each of the U.S. persons who purchased shares of our common stock during the
period October 1, 1999 to 2000 and who are receiving our rescission offer.

Dated     July 2, 2001


                                           High Tech Travel Services Corporation

                                           /s/ Benjamin Callari
                                           -----------------------
                                           By: Benjamin Callari, Pres
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Troy HYMAN.

No. 61080.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 31, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS'- and MARCUS, JJ., would grant.