alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit (31)(a)
 WACHOVIA CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 CERTIFICATION
      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ G. Kennedy Thompson
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 673

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that dislocated

defense workers are eligible for the targeted jobs credit.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 1993

Mr. GALLEGLY (for himself, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. TORKILDSEN, Mr. GINGRICH, and Mr. DORNAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that dislocated defense workers are eligible for the targeted jobs credit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dislocated Defense

5 Workers’ Job Assistance Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. DISLOCATED DEFENSE WORKERS TREATED AS

7 MEMBERS OF TARGETED GROUP.

8 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Paragraph (1) of section 51(d)

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining members
2

•HR 673 IH

1 of a targeted group) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the

2 end of subparagraph (I), by striking the period at the end

3 of subparagraph (J), and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding

4 at the end thereof the following new subparagraph:

5 ‘‘(K) a dislocated defense worker.’’

6 (b) DISLOCATED DEFENSE WORKER.—Subsection

7 (d) of section 51 of such Code is amended by redesignating

8 paragraphs (13), (14), (15), and (16), as paragraphs (14),

9 (15), (16), and (17), respectively, and by inserting after

10 paragraph (12) the following new paragraph:

11 ‘‘(13) DISLOCATED DEFENSE WORKER.—The

12 term ‘dislocated defense worker’ means any individ13 ual—

14 ‘‘(A) if—

15 ‘‘(i) the Secretary of Defense certifies

16 that—

17 ‘‘(I) such individual had been in18 voluntarily separated (within the

19 meaning of section 1141 of title 10,

20 United States Code) from the Armed

21 Forces as the result of reductions in

22 defense expenditures, or

23 ‘‘(II) such individual had been in24 voluntarily terminated from civilian

25 employment in the Defense Depart-
3

•HR 673 IH

1 ment as the result of reductions in de2 fense expenditures, or

3 ‘‘(ii) the designated local agency cer4 tifies that such individual was involuntarily

5 terminated from employment by an em6 ployer (other than a governmental body) as

7 the result of reductions in such employer’s

8 business caused by reductions in defense

9 expenditures, and

10 ‘‘(B) if the hiring date is during the 1-year

11 period beginning on the date of the involuntary

12 separation or termination (as the case may be)

13 referred to in subparagraph (A).

14 For purposes of paragraph (17), any reference to

15 the designated local agency shall, in the case of indi16 viduals referred to in subparagraph (A)(i), include a

17 reference to the Secretary of Defense.’’

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

19 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for

20 the employer after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,983
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,988
<INVENTORY>                                    170,970
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               397,564
<PP&E>                                         200,934
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 879,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          159,325
<BONDS>                                        498,245
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,262
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,555
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   194,817
<SALES>                                        444,652
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               444,652
<CGS>                                          253,187
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  253,187
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,146
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,428
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,415
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,602
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,813
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,813
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 63/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 63 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 518 March 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 63

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 518 March 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 063/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |
| 2008/C 063/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4974 — Gores Group/Sagem Communications) (1) | 2 |
| 2008/C 063/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5026 — KKR/Northgate Information Solutions) (1) | 2 |
| 2008/C 063/04 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4941 — Henkel/Adhesives and Electronic Business) (1) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2008/C 063/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

2008/C 063/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4974 — Gores Group/Sagem Communications) (1)

2

2008/C 063/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5026 — KKR/Northgate Information Solutions) (1)

2

2008/C 063/04

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4941 — Henkel/Adhesives and Electronic Business) (1)

3

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 063/05 | Euro exchange rates | 4 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2008/C 063/06 | Commission communication concerning Article 4(3) of Directive 98/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on injunctions for the protection of consumers' interests, concerning the entities qualified to bring an action under Article 2 of this Directive (1) | 5 |
| 2008/C 063/07 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Council Directive 89/686/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to personal protective equipment (1) | 44 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2008/C 063/05

Euro exchange rates

4

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2008/C 063/06

Commission communication concerning Article 4(3) of Directive 98/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on injunctions for the protection of consumers' interests, concerning the entities qualified to bring an action under Article 2 of this Directive (1)

5

2008/C 063/07

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Council Directive 89/686/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to personal protective equipment (1)

44

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Friendly Ice Cream Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended April 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George M. Condos, as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Paul V. Hoagland, as Executive Vice President of Administration and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | By:    | /s/ GEORGE M. CONDOS                                                                              |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | George M. Condos                                                                                       |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and  President  (Principal Executive Officer)                                  |
|        | Date:  | May 11, 2007                                                                                           |
|   |   |                                                                                                   |
|   | By:    | /s/ PAUL V. HOAGLAND                                                                              |
|   | Name:  | Paul V. Hoagland                                                                                       |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice President of Administration and  Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer) |
|        | Date:  | May 11, 2007                                                                                           |

 

----
22124
                        POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                


     I, the undersigned, hereby constitute and appoint MARTIN
MUCCI as my true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact to act
with full power and authority and in my name, place and stead as
I, myself, could act for the sole purpose of executing the Form
10-K of Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1998, pursuant to Instruction D(2)(a) of the Form
10-K and in accordance with Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(24) of the
Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and with full and unqualified authority to delegate such power to
any person or persons as my attorney-in-fact shall select.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THIS INSTRUMENT HAS BEEN SIGNED AND
DELIVERED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS OF MARCH 15, 1999.


                             /s/ Harlan D. Calkins
                            
                            ____________________________________
                               Harlan D. Calkins
                            
                             /s/ Katherine M. Clark
                            
                            ____________________________________
                              Katherine M. Clark

                              /s/ Maurice F. Holmes
                            
                            ____________________________________
                                Maurice F. Holmes

                              /s/ Thomas H. Jackson

                            ____________________________________
                               Thomas H. Jackson

                              /s/ Robert Johnson
                            
                            ____________________________________
                                Robert Johnson
                            
                             /s/ Richard P. Miller, Jr.
                            
                            ____________________________________
                               Richard P. Miller, Jr.

                              /s/ Christine B. Whitman

                            ____________________________________
                                Christine B. Whitman
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1556

MARK J. ADAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, a

municipal corporation; PAUL GRAZIANO, in his

capacity as Executive Director of the Housing

Authority for Baltimore City,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-02-

1608-MJG)

Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 16, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark J. Adams, Appellant Pro Se. William Fitts Ryan, Jr.,

WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland; Thurman Wilbert

Zollicoffer, Jr., City Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Mark J. Adams appeals the district court’s order granting the

Defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil action based on lack of

standing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Adams v. Mayor of Baltimore, No. CA-02-1608-MJG (D. Md. filed May

23, 2002 & entered May 24, 2002). We deny the Appellees’ motion

for summary disposition. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Stanley Aaron HEADRICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-719.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 15, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906


of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Friedman Industries,
Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the
period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jack Friedman, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 19, 2005

| |                     
| | --------------------
| | By /s/ JACK FRIEDMAN
| |                     
| | Name: Jack Friedman 

| |        |                                                  
| | ------ | -------------------------------------------------
| | Title: | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 68

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that remarriage of the

surviving spouse of a veteran after age 55 shall not result in termination

of dependency and indemnity compensation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that

remarriage of the surviving spouse of a veteran after

age 55 shall not result in termination of dependency

and indemnity compensation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 103(d) of title 38, United States Code, is

4 amended by adding the following new paragraph after

5 paragraph (3):

6 ‘‘(4) The remarriage after age 55 of a surviving

7 spouse of a veteran shall not bar payment of benefits

8 under section 1311 of this title.’’.
2

HR 68 IH

Æ
#### Joseph W. PRIVETT v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49702.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 11, 1978.

Blair & Mackey, Oscar P. Mackey, Oxford, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Pete J. Cajoleas, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lafayette County; W. W. Brown, Judge.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., INZER and SMITH, P. JJ., ROBERTSON, SUGG, WALKER, BROOM and LEE, JJ., and JACK B. WELDY, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED.

BOWLING, J., took no part.
**Exhibit 31(b)****CERTIFICATION**I, Brian R. Day, Chief Financial Officer of Viseon, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Viseon, Inc.; 2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls.**Date: September 30, 2005**/s/ Brian R. DayBrian R. Day, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00172-CV

M&J BRAZOS VALLEY PROPERTY 

HOLDINGS, LTD., AND MARK HOMEYER,

Appellants

v.

CHRISTOPHER AND KATIE STAVINOHA,

Appellees

From the 21st District Court

Burleson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 27,466

ORDER

This appeal was referred to mediation on October 24, 2018. The mediation was 

ordered to take place within 30 days after the date of the Order.

The mediator has requested an extension of time to complete the mediation. That 

request is granted. Mediation in this appeal must be completed within 60 days after the 

date of this order. All other terms and conditions of the October 24, 2018 order remain 

in effect. 

PER CURIAM
M&J Brazos Valley Property Holdings, LTD. v. Stavinoha Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Order issued and filed November 7, 2018