alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
APPENDIX 5C. MICROWAVE OVEN DISPLAY CONFIGURATIONS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

5C.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................5C-1

5C.2 DISPLAY CONFI GURATIONS.............................................................................5C-1

LIST OF FIGURE

Figure 5C.2.1 Numeric Display................................................................................................5 C-1 Figure 5C.2.2 Alphanumeric Display .......................................................................................5C-1 Figure 5C.2.3 Dot-Matrix Array Display .................................................................................5C-2

5C-iAPPENDIX 5C. MICROWAVE OVEN DISPLAY CONFIGURATIONS

5C.1 INTRODUCTION

DOE reviewed various configurations of mi crowave oven displays in order to gain a better understanding of how th e number of active elements, and hence display power consumption, can vary as a function of the digits or characters being displayed. Such an analysis helped DOE to determine the optimal method to measure a representative average standby power, given the possible variati on in standby power during testing.

5C.2 DISPLAY CONFIGURATIONS

The simplest displays are the numeric variet y, which can only show the time as a series of digits. A simplified representation can be found below in Figure 5C.2.1, which shows four individual digits. Each digit may have up to seven active elements (for the purpose of this discussion, an element is considered “active” when ever the consumer can vi ew it in contrast to the background.) Thus, each digit has a changing number of active elements as the clock time advances or a cooking timer counts down.

Digit Individual Element Figure 5C.2.1 Numeric Display

More sophisticated displays can repres ent alphanumeric characters via additional elements. A simplified version of such a displa y appears below in Figure 5C.2.2. Such displays usually have more than four digits, allowing an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to scroll messages to a microwave oven user.

Figure 5C.2.2 Alphanumeric Display

5C-1The most flexible displays use dot matrix ar rays. Such higher-resolu tion displays allow a microwave oven OEM to represent most Western fonts and some Asian fonts with acceptable clarity, allowing the most effective communicati on with a user. Changeable microwave oven controller daughter-cards allow an OEM to readily customi ze the microwave oven language to suit local markets. The array shown below in Figure 5C.2.3 is a simplified example.

Figure 5C.2.3 Dot-Matrix Array Display

5C-2
##### 



ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING
CRITERIA
   Platform:
 Applicable Servicing Criteria:
 Period:
  
 
 
 1




---



##### 



The Bank of New York
    
    The Bank of New YorkThe Bank of New York Trust
    
    The Bank of New York TrustCompany, N.A.
    
    Company, N.A.The Bank of New York (Delaware)/s/ Robert L. Griffin
    
    /s/ Patrick J. TadieRobert L. Griffin
    
    Patrick J. TadieAuthorized Singer
    
    Authorized SingerMarch 1, 2007
 2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

STEVEN J. D'AMICO, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1948

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
#### Samuel Richard EXNICIOS v. J. L. MILLER and North River Insurance Company.

No. 60280.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1977.

In re: Samuel Richard Exnicios, Individually and as father of his minor son, Valery *882P. Exnicios applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Washington. 346 So.2d 729.

Not considered. Not timely.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

### AIR RESOURCES BOARD P. O. Box 2815 Sacramento, California 95812 September 13, 2010 ARB Staff Rule Review Results To: Kevin J. Williams, Program Coordinator Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District Telephone Number: (916) 874-4851 e-mail: kjwilliams@airquality.org
From: Alex Krichevsky, (916) 324-6222 e-mail: akrichev@arb.ca.gov The following rule, which is scheduled for a hearing to be held by your District Board on September 23, 2010, were received by us on August 23, 2010, for our review: Rule 466 Solvent Cleaning The Air Resources Board staff has reviewed the rules and, based on the information available to us at this time, we have no comments. The rules were examined by the Stationary Source Division, the Enforcement Division, and by the Monitoring and Laboratory Division. If you have any questions, please contact me by e-mail or at the telephone number above.
DESIGNATE TYPE OF COMPLETION New Well WorkOver Deepen Plug Back Same Reservoir Different Reservoir Oil Gas Dry DESCRIPTION OF WELL AND LEASE Operator Address & Phone No. Federal, State or Indian Lease Number or name of lessor if fee lease Well Number Field & Reservoir Location County Sec. Township-Range or Block & Survey
feet feet Producing interval(s) for this completion Rotary tools used (interval) Cable tools used (interval) Was this well directionally drilled? Was directional survey made? Was copy of directional survey filed? Date filed Date filed CASING RECORD Casing (report all strings set in well -- conductor, surface, intermediate, producing, etc.) Purpose Size hole drilled Size casing set Weight (lb./ft.) Depth set Sacks cement Amount pulled P.B.T.D. Single, dual, or triple completion? If this is a dual or triple completion furnish separate report for each completion Total depth Date spudded Date total depth reached Date completed, ready to produce Elevation of casing head flange Elevation (DF, KB, RT or Gr.)

TUBING RECORD LINER RECORD in. ft. ft. in. ft. ft. Size Depth set Packer set at Size Top Bottom Sacks cement Screen (ft.) PERFORATION RECORD ACID, SHOT, FRACTURE, CEMENT SQUEEZE RECORD Number per ft. Size & type Depth interval Amount & kind of material used Depth interval

INITIAL PRODUCTION Date of first production Producing method (indicate if flowing, gas lift or pumping -- if pumping, show size & type of pump) Date of test Hours tested Choke size Oil prod. during test Gas prod. during test Water prod. during test Oil gravity bbls. MCF bbls. *API Tubing pressure Casing pressure Calculated rate of production per 24 hrs. Oil Gas Water Gas - oil ratio bbls. MCF bbls. Disposition of gas (state whether vented, used for fuel or sold)

Signature CERTIFICATE: I, the undersigned, under the penalty of perjury, state that I am the of the report was prepared under my supervision and direction and that the facts stated therein are true, correct and complete to thebest of my knowledge.

Date (company), and that I am authorized by said company to make this report; and that this

Form No. 4 10/98 Permit No. Mail completed form to: Oil and Gas Program Adminiastrator Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, #100 Tucson, AZ 85701 Well Completion or Recompletion Report and Well Log File One Copy 

## STATE OF ARIZONA OIL & GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION Temporary Abandon 

## WELL COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT AND WELL LOG

Type of electric or other logs run (check logs filed with the Commission)

# DETAIL OF FORMATIONS PENETRATED FORMATION TOP BOTTOM DESCRIPTION

# *

*Show all important zones of porosity, detail of all cores, and all drill-stem tests, including depth interval tested, cushion used, time tool open, flowing and shut-in pressures, and recoveries. INSTRUCTIONS: Attach drillers log or other acceptable log of well. This Well Completion or Recompletion report and well log shall be filed with the Oil and Gas Program Administrator, Arizona Geological Survey, 416 W. Congress #100, Tucson, AZ 85701 not later than thirty days after completion pursuant to A.A.C. R12-7-121. Form No. 4
November 28, 2023

Subject: Amendments adopted at CoP19 entered into force on November 25, 2023

Background: On November 28, 2023, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered 

Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) Secretariat posted a Notification to the Parties (No. 

2023/137) announcing amendments adopted at CoP19 that were entered into force on November 

25, 2023, after a 12 month delay as specified in Notification to the Parties No. 2023/015.

Importers and exporters can find the official CITES Notification at: 

 Notification to the Parties 2023 (cites.org)

Action: Effective November 25, 2023, the following amendments to species listing are 

indicated below.

Species Transferred from Appendix II to Appendix I

• Pycnonotus zeylanicus (straw-headed bulbul)

All Species in the Family Included in Appendix II

• Carcharhinidae spp. (Requiem sharks)

For further information on how to obtain U.S. CITES documents, please see the Service’s Office 

of International Affairs website at: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service ePermits 

on how For further information on import declaration requirements for CITES marine species 

taken on the high seas, please see: OLE Public Bulletin - Imports of CITES Marine Species 

Taken on the High Seas 5-18-23 .pdf | FWS.gov

Contact:

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 

Office of Law Enforcement 

703-358-1949

lawenforcement@fws.gov

NOTICE TO THE WILDLIFE 

IMPORT/EXPORT COMMUNITY
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Willie OLDHAM v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 53144.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1973.

In re: William Oldham applying for remedial writs and writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. The application shows on its face that relief demanded is not due.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0018 SNPRM

Directorate ID: 2011-CE-042-AD

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

 NO COMMENTS RECEIVED – If this box is checked, no signatures are required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO, we don’t agree because 
Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Date

Branch Manager Date
# ORIGINAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA


### FEB 

## 2 2 2022 PR 06-0544 IN RE PETITION OF ROSS ROBERT SHARKEY FORREINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE BAR OF MONTANA Bowen Greenwooc Clerk of Suprerne Cou Stain

### c rtf ry. E.R .

Ross Robert Sharkey has petitioned the Court for reinstatement to active status in the State Bar of Montana. Sharkey was placed on inactive status on July 12, 2021, for failing to comply with the Rules for Continuing Legal Education for the reporting year ending March 31, 2021. Sharkey has provided a letter from the State Bar certifying that Sharkey has now completed all CLE requirements for that reporting year, in accordance with Rule 13 ofthe CLE Rules. ThePetition statesthat Sharkey is not currently subjectto disciplinary proceedings and has not committed any acts or omissions sanctionable under the Rules ofProfessional Conduct while on inactive status. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Ross Robert Sharkey for reinstatement to active status in the State Bar ofMontana is GRANTED. Upon payment ofany remaining dues, fees, and the state licensetax to the State Bar ofMontana, Sharkey shall be reinstated. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. b_54 DATED this day ofFebruary, 2022 02/22/2022

Case Number: PR 06-0544

# JvL

,44-w/J
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 June 2, 2009

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio         43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.    Other Events
----------   --------------------------------------------

          As of May 31, 2009, preliminary assets under management totaled
$4.763 billion.  Following is a summary as of May 31, 2009 (in millions):

				         Equity    Fixed Income	    Total
Individually Managed Accounts 	        $ 1,522	      $   29       $ 1,551
Mutual Funds 			          2,902	          98	     3,000
Private Investment Funds	   	    212            0           212
                                        -------       ------       -------
Total			       	        $ 4,636       $  127       $ 4,763

Investment Strategy
-------------------
Small and Small-Mid Cap         $    581
Large Cap and Select		   1,967
Long-Short		           2,088
Strategic and Fixed Income     	     127
				--------
Total			           4,763


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: June 2, 2009	                    By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                            Officer and Secretary
#### Arline W. SULLIVAN, Appellant, v. Lee George HALL, Appellee.

No. 70-824.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 9, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Van Marion BEVILLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-194.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 19, 1974.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and James O. Brecher, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Enoch J. Whitney, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and BOYER and McCORD, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED BUILDERS, INC. v. OXFORD PROPERTIES, INC.

SC 2594.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 2, 1977.

Donald B. Weir, Jr., Huntsville, for appellant.

Gary C. Huckaby, Huntsville, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *Birmingham National Bank v. Bradley,*108 Ala. 205, 19 So. 791 (1895). See also *McElroy’s Alabama Evidence,*§ 10.01.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 742 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 742

 To amend chapter 11 of title 31, United States Code, to require that 
 the annual budget submitted by the President includes a statement of 
  revenues obtained from the sale, lease, and transfer of Government 
                    assets, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1993

  Mr. Synar (for himself and Mr. Miller of California) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                               Operations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 11 of title 31, United States Code, to require that 
 the annual budget submitted by the President includes a statement of 
  revenues obtained from the sale, lease, and transfer of Government 
                    assets, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Investment Recovery, 
Economic Security and Liquidation Examination and Disclosure Act''.

SEC. 2. REVENUES FROM SALE, LEASE, AND TRANSFER OF ASSETS.

    Section 1105(a) of chapter 11 of title 31, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(28) a separate statement of--
                    ``(A) projected revenues during the fiscal year for 
                which the budget is submitted from the anticipated 
                sale, lease, or transfer of any physical asset; and
                    ``(B) the estimated price at which this asset or a 
                comparable asset would be sold in an arms length 
                transaction in the private sector;
        asset by asset and aggregated by major functional category.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall become effective for fiscal 
year 1994 and shall be fully reflected in the fiscal year 1994 budget 
submitted by the President in February 1993 as required by section 
1105(a) of title 31, United States Code.

                                 <all>
```