alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Contact:
                                                  Daniel Drum,
                                                  Investor Relations
                                                  Seven Seas Petroleum Inc.
                                                  713-622-8218

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

                      SEVEN SEAS ANNOUNCES ESCUELA 2 UPDATE

July 29, 2002 - HOUSTON, TEXAS - Seven Seas Petroleum Inc. (AMEX: "SEV")
announced today that the Company has resumed drilling on the Escuela 2
exploration well. The well is currently drilling at 18,808 feet in interbedded
sandstones and siltstones. Shortly after drilling in new formation below the
7-5/8 inch liner, there was a gas show of 12 percent with traces of heavier
hydrocarbons (C2-C5) and an approximate 35 barrel influx of fluid. Initial
analysis of the fluid entering the wellbore indicates water with a skim of oil.

     The Company believes that the geological information available at this time
is not conclusive enough to determine the exact stratigraphic and structural
position of the bottom of the wellbore. However, Seven Seas believes it is
likely that the Cambao fault has not been encountered and the Escuela 2 is
currently drilling in the lower part of the Cretaceous Villeta formation. A
review of drilling samples and paleontological work is being carried out on a
continual basis to aid in the geological interpretation.

     Seven Seas plans to continue drilling to a total depth of approximately
19,500 feet, provided wellbore conditions permit. When the well reaches total
depth, the Company plans to run electric logs for further evaluation.

     Seven Seas Petroleum Inc. is an independent oil and gas exploration and
production company operating in Colombia, South America. The Company's primary
emphasis is on the development and production of the Guaduas Oil Field and
exploration of the Subthrust Dindal Prospect, both of which are located in
Colombia's prolific Magdalena Basin.

Statements regarding anticipated oil and gas production and other oil and gas
operating activities, including the costs and timing of those activities, are
"forward looking statements" within the meaning of the Securities Litigation
Reform Act. The statements involve risks that could significantly impact Seven
Seas Petroleum Inc. These risks include, but are not limited to, adverse general
economic conditions, operating hazards, drilling risks, inherent uncertainties
in interpreting engineering and geologic data, competition, reduced availability
of drilling and other well services, fluctuations in oil and gas prices and
prices for drilling and other well services and government regulation and
foreign political risks, as well as other risks discussed in detail in the Seven
Seas Petroleum Inc.'s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                      # # #
# FILED

December 22, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk FOR PUBLICATION 1 2 3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE 4 5 AT JACKSON 6 7 8 9 10 STATE OF TENNESSEE, ( 11 ( 12 Plaintiff-Appellee, ( Henry County 13 ( 14 ( Hon. C. Creed McGinley, Judge 15 ( 16 v . ( S. Ct. No. 02S01-9607-CC-00068 17 ( 18 ( 19 ( 20 DAVID WILLARD PHIPPS, JR., ( 21 ( 22 Defendant-Appellant. ( 23 24 25 26 27 CONCURRING OPINION 28 29 30 31 I concur in the decision to remand the case to the 32 trial court with instructions; however, I would impose a more 33 precise standard for determining if the presumption of 34 vindictiveness has been overcome. 35 36 The majority states that the presumption of 37 vindictiveness “may be overcome by clear and convincing evidence 38 which demonstrates that the prosecutor’s decision was motivated 39 by legitimate purpose,” and further, “the State must proffer fact 40 specific, legitimate, on-the-record explanations for its conduct 41 which dispel the appearance of vindictiveness.” Majority 42 opinion, p. 20. Consequently, the proof presented by the State 43-2-

must show a legitimate, as opposed to specious, purpose for the 1 increased punishment which will dispel the appearance, as opposed 2 to the reality, of vindictiveness. This standard would not be 3 met with proof which showed only that the prosecutor acted in 4 good faith. It is the “fear of vindictiveness” which may chill a 5 defendant’s exercise of the right to appeal or collaterally 6 attack the first conviction.Blackledge v. Perry, 417 U.S. 21, 7 94 S. Ct. 2098, 2102 (1974). As stated in In Re Bower, 700 P.2d 8 1269, 1277 (Cal. 1985), “[t]he presumption is not based on the 9 subjective state of mind of the individual prosecutor and does 10 not imply that he or she individually harbors an improper 11 motive.” 12 13 In my view, this high standard cannot be met with 14 evidence of facts or information which was reasonably available 15 to the prosecutor when the original charge was made. I would 16 apply the rule adopted by the California Supreme Court inIn Re 17

Bower: 18 19 In order to rebut the presumption of 20 vindictiveness, the prosecution must 21 demonstrate that (1) the increase in charge 22 was justified by some objective change in 23 circumstances or in the state of the 24 evidence which legitimately influenced the 25 charging process and (2) that the new 26 information could not reasonably have been 27 discovered at the time the prosecution 28 exercised its discretion to bring the 29 original charge. 30 31 Id. 32 33 34-3- I am authorized to state that Justice Birch joins in 1 this Concurring Opinion. 2 3 4

____________________________ 5 Reid, J. 6
| (1)   | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period      ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of MedClean Technologies,      Inc. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 20, 2010       |   | /s/      Cheryl      K. Sadowski |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                                                           |   | Cheryl      K. Sadowski          |   |
|                                                           |   | Chief      Financial Officer     |   |
|                                                           |   |                             |   |

----
# 

Get Started!

### You Scored: 

### **Ranking:**
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Scott
      Grisanti, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Aduromed
      Industries, Inc., (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the three month period ended
      September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
      or
      15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      November 14, 2008





/s/
                Scott GrisantiScott
                GrisantiPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
#### Robert Ralph MORET, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-161.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 5, 1971.

Milton E. Grusmark, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ-

PEARSON, Chief Judge.

The appellant changed his plea from not guilty to guilty upon a charge of murder in the first degree. He was adjudicated guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment. Some four and one-half years later he brought a motion to vacate the judgment and sentence under Fla. CrPR 1.850, 33 F. S.A. Although other grounds for relief were alleged in the motion, the burden of this appeal is that the trial court erred in denying the motion without an evidentiary hearing upon the ground that appellant was not properly advised by counsel and the court upon the consequences of his change of plea.

The trial judge denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing upon a holding that the record clearly refuted appellant’s claim for relief. As pertains to the ground for relief with which we are now concerned, appellant’s allegations in his motion are: (1) that he “had very limited knowledge” of the English languáge; (2) that he “had no opportunity” to discuss his rights of trial or the consequences of his change of plea with his court-appointed attorney; (3) that the trial court failed to fully advise him upon the consequences of a plea of guilty to the charge of murder in the first degree.

*501It must be admitted that under the circumstances of this case, where the appellant was represented by one of the most experienced and able members of the bar practicing before the criminal courts, the allegations set forth above are somewhat incredulous. In addition this guilty plea was accepted prior to the United States Supreme Court decision in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L. Ed.2d 274, and the publication of Fla. CrPR l:170(a). Nevertheless we are convinced from our examination of the record that the trial judge erroneously denied appellant’s motion without .an evidentiary hearing. The right in Florida to be advised upon and intelligently make a plea of guilty to this most serious crime anti-dates the pronouncements of a constitutional right therein by the Supreme Court of the United States. Cf. Reddick v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 340.

Accordingly the order denying the motion to vacate is affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded for an evi-dentiary hearing upon petitioner’s allegation that his plea of guilty was entered without the opportunity for legal counsel and without an intelligent explanation of the consequences of his change of plea.

Reversed and remanded.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906


of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Friedman Industries,
Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ben Harper, Senior Vice
President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2005



| |                  
| | -----------------
| | By /s/ BEN HARPER
| |                  
| | Name: Ben Harper 

| |        |                                                      
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------
| | Title: | Senior Vice President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** Docket Number: F AA- 2015 - 0933 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM098AD
PROFORMA SB SBF27 - 28 - 071, R1 --- 3/6/14 AOM AOF27.043#03 --- 3/6/14

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

The Board of Directors
Ampace Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
333-44889, No. 333-41521 and No. 333-41515 on Form S-8 of Ampace Corporation of
our report dated March 12, 1998, except as to note 3 which is as of March 30,
1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Ampace Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years then ended, which report is included in the December 31, 1997 annual
report on Form 10-KSB of Ampace Corporation.


                                                     KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Little Rock Arkansas
March 30, 1998
# Official Journal C 256A/5 Au

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 256A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 585 August 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 256A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 585 August 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Committee of the Regions |
| 2015/C 256A/01 | Vacancy notice No CdR/AD14/10BIS/2015 concerning a post of Director (M/F) at the Directorate for Communication — Publication under Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations — Simultaneous publication under Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Committee of the Regions

2015/C 256A/01

Vacancy notice No CdR/AD14/10BIS/2015 concerning a post of Director (M/F) at the Directorate for Communication — Publication under Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations — Simultaneous publication under Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations

Publication under Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations

Simultaneous publication under Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dennis J. Martin, certify that:

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by  this quarterly report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant and wehave:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's latestfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting;

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal  control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: August 6, 2004
Exhibit 99(1)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Florida Public Utilities Company (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, John English, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ John English



John English
Chief Executive Officer
May 5, 2003



{MI670281;1}
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**Certification
      of CEO and CFO Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10Q of Frawley Corporation (the
      “Company”) for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael P.
      Frawley as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
      hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/Michael
      P. Frawley


Name:
      Michael P. Frawley


Title:
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Date:  November
      10, 2006





This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Lycoming SERVICE

652 Oliver Street

Williamsport, PA 17701 U.S.A.

717/323-6181

DATE:

SUBJECT:

MODELS AFFECTED:

TIME OF COMPLIANCE:

INSTRUCTION

March 7, 1975 Service Instruction No. 1320

Engineering Aspects are

FAA (DEER) Approved

Tightening Procedure for Exhaust Manifold Components

All Avco Lycoming turbocharged aircraft engines.

At anytime exhaust manifold system components are

removed or replaced.

When it is necessary to remove or replace any part of the exhaust manifold system on Avco Lycoming turbocharged engines precautions must be taken when reassembling parts to the engine; uneven tightening may cause damage resulting in

probable loss of exhaust gas pressure.

Exhaust manifolding for Avco Lycoming turbocharged engines, covers both right

and left half of the engine beginning at no. 1 and no. 2 cylinders at the front of the

engine and continues to the transition assembly at the rear of the engine. If any

component of this system is removed or replaced, for any reason, loosen all attachments on that side before installing the new or removed component. Then, during

assembly tighten each attaching part equally and uniformly; that is, partially tighten

all of the fastenings before securely tightening any one of them. Never fully tighten

any part of the exhaust system fully before proceeding to another part on the same

side of the engine. Tighten each part on each side of the engine equally.

If the replacement or removal of any exhaust manifold component requires the

removal of a crush-proof gasket, a new gasket should be reassembled to the engine.

Do not reuse a crush-proof gasket. These gaskets areusually found at cylinder exhaust ports and at v-band clamp locations.

CAUTION

Anytime a clamp is assembled over an exhaust system

component be very careful not to spread or force the

clamp beyond its normal open position. To do so will

either distort its shape and cause an ineffective seal

or it will rupture the metal and result in eventual

failure of the clamp.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Amendment No.
1 to the Annual Report of Azzurra Holding Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December
31, 2013 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Daniel Rumsey, Principal
Executive and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certifies, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.








Date:
April 9, 2019
/s/ Daniel W.
RumseyDaniel
W. Rumsey
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive and Financial Officer)