alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Willie ALEXANDER, Jr.

No. 62003.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 14, 1978.

L. Howard McCurdy, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Having been convicted of the offense of simple burglary, La.R.S. 14:62, and adjudicated a multiple offender under the provisions of La.R.S. 15:529.1, defendant was sentenced to serve one hundred years at hard labor. We note as an error patent on the face of the record of this appeal that *776the sentence is not authorized by law. See, La.C.Cr.P. art. 920(2).

La.R.S. 15:529.1(A)(3), as applied in this case, provides for a sentence of not less than twenty years nor more than the accused’s natural life. The term of 100 years actually imposed on defendant clearly exceeds his natural life, See, *State v. Delaney,*359 So.2d 976 (La.1978), and therefore is illegal.

Accordingly, defendant’s sentence is annulled and set aside, and the case is remanded to the district court for resentenc-ing in accordance with law.
#### In re ESTATE of Ozell VICKERS, Deceased.

No. 70-975.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 1971.

Appeal from County Judge’s Court, Seminole County; Wallace H. Hall, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,041
<SECURITIES>                                    15,088
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,934
<PP&E>                                           4,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,027
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,088
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,999
<SALES>                                         20,145
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,145
<CGS>                                              272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,066<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,197)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,197)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,197)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.95)<F2>
<FN>
<F1>In connection with the acquisition of Lor/Geske Bock Associates, Inc., the
Company recognized a one-time expense amounting to $7.1 million of in process
research and development.
<F2>In the first nine months of 1996, common share equivalents, if included, would
have an anti-dilutive effect on the net loss per share calculation, and are
therefore excluded from the fully diluted calculation.  If included, the net
loss per share would be $0.82 per share.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

## Agenda

Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board Meeting Agenda June 25, 2018 In Person 8:30 a.m.

## Open Session

1. Approval of the Minutes for the May 30, 2018 Board Member Meeting

2. Monthly Reports

(a) Participant Activity

(b) Legislative Report

(c) Investment Policy

3. Vendor Financials

4. IT Update

5. Strategic Acquisition

## Closed Session

Information covered under 5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(4), (c)(9)(B).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Kimberly Weaver, Director Office of External Affairs (202) 942-1640

Dated: June 14, 2018.

Dharmesh Vashee,

Deputy General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-13175 Filed 6-15-18; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
STATE ACTION EFFECTIVE

DATE STATUS

Standard of 50 ppm for home

heating oil & lighter grade fuel 7/1/2011

Standard of 15 ppm for home

heating oil & lighter grade fuel 7/1/2014

Biodiesel blending requirements of

2% beginning in 2011 to increase

incrementally to 20 percent by 2020 7/1/2011

Standard of 500 ppm for all distillate

fuels 1/1/2014

Standard of 50 ppm for all distallate

fuels 1/1/2016

Standard of 15 ppm for all distallate

fuels 1/1/2018

Standard of 500 ppm for all heating

oil & lighter grade fuel 7/1/2014

Standard of 15 ppm for all heating

oil & lighter grade fuels 7/1/2016

Cuts allowable sulfur level in No. 2

heating oil to 15 ppm 7/1/2012

For NY CITY: Cuts allowable sulfur

level in No. 4 heating oil to 1,500

ppm 10/1/2012

Would cut allowable sulfur levels to

15 ppm for No. 2 heating oil; 2,500

for No. 4 heating oil; and 5,000 for

No. 5, No. 6 and heavier oils Proposed rulemaking

and in public comment

period

A bill introduced in the PA legislature

would require all heating oil used for

residential, commercial and

industrial heating to have a sulfur

content of 15 ppm or below Legislation proposed

DC, DE,

MA, MD,

NH, RI, VT No actions to lower sulfur content

are currently proposed. Measures have been

discussed in some

States, but formal

actions have not beed

taken. PA 5/1/2012 CT Legislation passed, but

is contingent on the

passage of similar

measures in NY, RI and

MA

Legislation passed;

rulemaking proposed

and in public comment

period ME 

## STATUS OF HEATING OIL SULFUR CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

FOR NORTHEASTERN USA

Legislation passed

NJ

Legislation Passed

NY

Last Updated: Sept. 17, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            11,247
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                          41
<MORTGAGE>                                          61
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  12,344
<CASH>                                           1,291
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                             232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,852
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  12,086
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         15
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,852
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                853
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  26
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     368
<BENEFITS>                                           0
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                         76
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    192
<INCOME-TAX>                                        63
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       130
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.77
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 15

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Frischs Restaurants, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying interim
consolidated balance sheet of Frischs Restaurants, Inc. (an Ohio Corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 11, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the
twenty-eight week and twelve week periods ended December 11, 2007 and December 12, 2006. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information
consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheet as of May 29, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated July 24, 2007, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                      
|----------------------
|GRANT THORNTON LLP    
|                      
|/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
|Cincinnati, Ohio      
|January 14, 2008
261 La. 230

#### AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY v. Claude E. NICHOLS et al.

No. 51992.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1972.

In re: Claude E. Nichols applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 254 So.2d 161.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
#### Arthur E. EDWARDS and Irene Edwards, his wife, Petitioners, v. George E. BARKET, as guardian of the person and property of Alden B. Randolph, Incompetent, Respondent.

No. 43610.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 14, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed. 273 So.2d 128.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
-77.6 -77.4 -77.2 -77.0 -76.8 -76.6 -76.4 -76.2 -76.0 -75.8

 39.2

 39.4

 39.6

 39.8

 40.0

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
#### HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Edna CURTIS, a widow and Edna Curtis, as Executrix of the Estate of Donald Curtis, deceased, Appellee.

No. 72-812.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 27, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Martin County; C. Pfeiffer Trowbridge, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Henry CLAY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-433.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 11, 1971.

Henry Clay, Jr., in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the final judgment of the lower court is affirmed. See Chandler v. United States, 413 F.2d 1018 (USCA, 5th Cir., 1969).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6606

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JUANITA WALKER COOPER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CR-92-108, CA-00-1288)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 28, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juanita Walker Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Miller Williams Shealy,

Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Juanita Walker Cooper seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Cooper, Nos. CR-92-108;

CA-00-1288 (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Charlie SHAVERS and Darlene Shavers v. Succession of Thomas D. SHAVERS.

No. 61124.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1977.

In re: Charlie Shavers and Darlene Shavers for or writ of re*1046view, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Catahoula.

Denied.
Exhibit 12

                     FLEMING COMPANIES, INC.
        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                    FISCAL YEAR ENDED THE LAST SATURDAY IN DECEMBER

                            2000      1999       1998     1997      1996
                                   (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
Earnings:
 Pre-tax income (loss)   $(200,889) $(62,581) $(598,202)  $82,685   $54,573
 Fixed charges, net        198,413    193,263   195,956   197,923   202,184

Total earnings (loss)      $(2,476)  $130,682 $(402,246) $280,608  $256,757

Fixed charges:
 Interest expense         $174,569   $165,180  $161,581  $162,506  $163,466
 Portion of rental charges
  deemed to be interest     23,331     27,626    33,948    35,050    38,356
 Capitalized interest and
  debt issuance cost
  amortization               2,051      1,117       604     1,186       104

Total fixed charges       $199,951   $193,923  $196,133  $198,742  $201,926

Deficiency                $202,427   $ 62,451  $598,379
Ratio of earnings (loss)
  to fixed charges               -       0.67         -      1.41      1.27


"Earnings" consist of income from continuing operations
before income taxes and fixed charges excluding capitalized
interest.  Capitalized interest amortized during the
respective periods is added back to earnings.

"Fixed charges, net" consist of interest expense, an
estimated amount of rental expense which is deemed to be
representative of the interest factor and amortization of
capitalized interest and debt issuance cost.

The pro forma ratio of earnings to fixed charges is omitted
as it is not applicable.

Under the company's long-term debt agreements, "earnings" and
"fixed charges" are defined differently and amounts and
ratios differ accordingly.

Results excluding strategic plan adjustments and one-time
items are as follows:

               FISCAL YEAR ENDED THE LAST SATURDAY IN DECEMBER
                           2000       1999     1998
                          (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)

Total adjusted earnings  $306,276  $261,757   $265,781
Total fixed charges       199,951   193,923   $196,133

Adjusted ratio of earnings
  to fixed charges           1.53      1.35       1.36
Comptroller General's Advisory Board Members, as of December 2023

Allen, Thad

Former Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard

Anderson, Lauren

Founder/CEO, LC Anderson International Consulting

Aviv, Diana

Founder and Principal, Our Covenant

Carnell, Richard

Former Associate Professor of Law, Fordham University

Carns, Michael P.C.

Former Vice Chief of Staff, General (retired) U.S. Air Force

Cole, Susan A.

President Emerita of Montclair State University 

DeAngelis, Catherine

Distinguished Service Professor Emerita, Johns Hopkins University

DeMarco, Edward J.

President, Housing Policy Council

Dinh-Zarr, T. Bella

Senior Advisor, Public Health & Transportation Traffic Injury Research Foundation (TIRF)

Evans, Karen 

Managing Director, Cyber Readiness Institute

Falcon, Armando

CEO, Falcon Capital Advisors

Fineberg, Harvey V.

President, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

Greenstein, Robert 

Visiting Fellow in Economic Studies, Brookings Institution,

Hamre, John J.

President and CEO, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)

Jackson, Shirley Ann
2

President Emerita, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Jenkins, Brian Michael

Senior Advisor to the President, RAND

Kitchen, Klon 

Managing Director at Beacon Global Strategies 

Light, Paul

Paulette Goddard Professor of Public Service, Wagner School of Public Service, NYU

Martin, Susan Forbes

Donald G. Herzberg Professor Emerita of International Migration, Walsh School of Foreign 

Service, Georgetown University

Marshall, Robert C.

Distinguished Professor of Economics, Penn State University

Newhouse, Joseph

MacArthur Professor of Health Policy and Management at Harvard University Chair, 

Committee on Higher Degrees in Health Policy, Harvard Medical School

Parker, Lynne 

Associate Vice Chancellor at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 

Perea-Henze, Raul

Managing Director at HORUS Advisors

Reilly, William K.

Senior Advisor, TPG Capital

Rossotti, Charles O.

Senior Advisor, The Carlyle Group

Steuerle, Eugene C.

Institute Fellow and Richard B. Fisher Chair, The Urban Institute

Weiner, Edie

Futurist and President, The Future Hunters
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 683 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 683

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the 
treatment of certain areas in applying the purchase price requirements 
                 applicable to mortgage revenue bonds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 1993

    Mrs. Lowey of New York introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the 
treatment of certain areas in applying the purchase price requirements 
                 applicable to mortgage revenue bonds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) subsection (e) 
of section 143 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
purchase price requirements) is amended by adding at the end thereof 
the following new paragraph:
            ``(7) Certain adjustments made applicable.--In determining 
        average area purchase price for purposes of paragraph (1), 
        adjustments comparable to those provided in the last 2 
        sentences of section 3(b)(2) of the United States Housing Act 
        of 1937 (as added by section 537(d) of the Cranston-Gonzalez 
        National Affordable Housing Act) shall apply. The preceding 
        sentence shall not apply if there is insufficient recent 
        statistical information with respect to the county referred to 
        in such sentences.''
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to financing 
provided after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
AMENDMENT NO. 1
                    DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, F.A.
                          EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
                  (AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF JANUARY 1, 1996)

                                AMENDMENT NO. 1,
                     EFFECTIVE AND ADOPTED JANUARY 22, 1997

WHEREAS,  the Board of Directors  of Downey  Savings has been advised by counsel
that,  in order  to be more  fully  assured  that the  Downey  Savings  and Loan
Association,  F.A.,  Employee  Stock  Purchase Plan (the "Plan") is eligible for
exemption from  registration  under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,  the
Plan should be amended to provide  that  participants  vote all shares of Downey
Financial Corp. Common Stock acquired pursuant to the Plan, whether  distributed
or undistributed; and

WHEREAS,  the Board of Directors has determined  that it is in the best interest
of Downey Savings to so amend the Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE,  BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED,  that Section 8.1 of the Plan be amended
to read in its entirety as follows (the "Amendment"):

     "Section 8.1 Rights of Stockholder.  Each Participant  shall be entitled to
direct the voting of all shares of Downey Financial Corp. Common Stock purchased
on his behalf under the Plan."

BE IT  FURTHER  RESOLVED,  that  the  officers  of  Downey  Savings  hereby  are
authorized,  empowered  and directed to take such further  actions as they shall
deem necessary or appropriate to permit the Amendment to become  effective or to
otherwise  carry out and  fulfill  the  purposes  and  intent  of the  foregoing
resolutions.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  Downey Savings and Loan  Association,  F.A. has caused this
Amendment No. 1 to be executed by its duly authorized officers.

Sponsoring Employer:

Downey Savings and Loan Association, F.A.

  /s/ Stephen W. Prough
--------------------------
Stephen W. Prough

  /s/ Thomas E. Prince
--------------------------
Thomas E. Prince

   /s/ JoLene Bryant
--------------------------
JoLene Bryant