alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 G&K SERVICES INC.
CERTIFICATION OF CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ Richard L. MarcantonioRichard L. Marcantonio, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 588 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 126

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 588

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 20 South Main in Beaver, Utah, as the ``Abe Murdock United States 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 30, 1993

                       Reported without amendment





                                                       Calendar No. 126
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 588


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 25 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                             June 30, 1993

                Reported by Mr. Glenn, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 20 South Main in Beaver, Utah, as the ``Abe Murdock United States 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 20 
South Main in Beaver, Utah, is designated as the ``Abe Murdock United 
States Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or 
other paper of the United States to the facility referred to in section 
1 is deemed to be a reference to the ``Abe Murdock United States Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1993.

            Attest:






                                                                 Clerk.`
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,As adopted pursuant toSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Binding Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2003, (the "Report"), I, Dennis J.Martin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:

/s/ Dennis J. Martin
 
Dennis J. Martin
 
Chairman, President and Chief      Executive Officer
 
November 13, 2003
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Argued October 2, 2019

Decided October 16, 2019

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 18

‐ 3164

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee

,

v

.

J OMO K. HILL,

Defendant

‐ Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

No. 2:18

‐ CR

‐ 101

‐ 1

‐ JPS

J. P. Stadtmueller

, J udge

.

O R D E R

Jomo K. Hill pleaded guilty to robbery and brandishing a firearm. Before his

sentencing hearing, the district court circulated a list of proposed conditions of

supervision. At the hearing, the district court pronounced his sentence and

incorporated those conditions by reference. On appeal, Hill initially argued that the

district court procedurally erred by incorporating the circulated list of conditions

without adding it to the record. After his opening brief, however, the district court

supplemented the record with that list, curing any procedural defect. This appeal is

therefore moot. We decline the defendant’s invitation to issue an advisory order to

clarify the proper procedure for incorporating conditions.

DISMISSED NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited onl y in accordance with Fed. R. A pp

. P. 32.1
EXHIBIT
23.1
 
 
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 To the
Board of Directors of
 Network
CN Inc.
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-141943 on Form S-8 of Network CN Inc. relating to our audit of the financial
statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Network CN Inc. for
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
  
 
 WEBB
& COMPANY, P.A.
 Certified
Public Accountants
 
 Boynton
Beach, Florida
 August 7,
2008
 
     
 
 
 1501
Corporate Drive, Suite 150 • Boynton Beach, FL 33426
 Telephone:
(561) 752-1721 • Fax: (561) 734-8562
 www.cpawebb.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<S>                            <C>
<ARTICLE>                      UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from FPL Group's and FPL's condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of September 30, 2000 and condensed consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

<CIK>                               0000753308
<NAME>                         FPL Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                         1,000,000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       Sep-30-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            9-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                          PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>               $7,928
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>             $3,925
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                  $1,843
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                $0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                          $1,241
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          $14,937
<COMMON>                                $2
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>               $2,848
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                     $2,829
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>          $5,679
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   $0
<PREFERRED>                             $226
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                    $3,480
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                      $0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>               $0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>          $0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>           $0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>               $0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>             $0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                        $0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>          $5,552
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>           $14,937
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>               $5,225
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                    $323
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>              $4,131
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>              $4,131
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                 $1,094
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                      $80
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>          $840
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                $201
<NET-INCOME>                            $639
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>             $11
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>           $639
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                $275
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>               $0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                  $1,055
<EPS-BASIC>                           $3.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                           $3.75




</TABLE>
```

EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Damien R. Tanaka, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report for the three month period ended March
31, 2006 on Form 10-QSB of General Devices, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of and for the periods presented in this report.

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and we
have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 25, 2006

/s/ Damien R. Tanaka

Damien R. Tanaka
Chairman of the Board,
President and
Chief Executive Officer
```
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Randolph E. BEDFORD, Petitioner, v. Honorable Russel H. McINTOSH, Circuit Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-622.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 24, 1973.

Prohibition denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00018-CV

In re Raymond Fierro

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Raymond Fierro filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. 

See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2010); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. He

complains that the trial court judge has failed to act on a recusal motion filed in connection with a

post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. Fierro seeks a writ of mandamus from this Court directing 1

the judge to either recuse himself from Fierro’s post-conviction habeas proceedings or request the

presiding judge of the administrative region to assign a judge to hear the recusal motion. See

generally Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2010); Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a.

Article 11.07 vests complete jurisdiction over post-conviction relief from final felony

convictions in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07

(West Supp. 2010); Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist.,

Fierro previously filed an application for writ of habeas corpus which was denied by 1

the Court of Criminal Appeals. It is unclear from the record whether Fierro has filed the

second application for writ of habeas corpus from which he wishes to recuse the trial judge. His

petition suggests that he filed the motion to recuse the judge in anticipation of filing the successive

habeas application.
910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); In re Watson, 253 S.W.3d 319, 320 (Tex.

App.—Amarillo 2008, orig. proceeding). The courts of appeals have no role in criminal law matters

pertaining to proceedings under article 11.07 and have no authority to issue writs of mandamus in

connection with such proceedings. See In re Briscoe, 20 S.W.3d 196 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th

Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]

2001, orig. proceeding); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 5 (West Supp. 2010). 

Thus, complaints regarding the trial court’s failure to address a recusal motion filed in

connection with an 11.07 post-conviction habeas proceeding should be addressed to the Court of

Criminal Appeals. See In re Golden, No. 12-11-00181-CR, 2011 WL 3329867, at *1 (Tex.

App.—Tyler July13, 2011) (mem op., not designated for publication) (relator’s complaint about trial

court’s failure to act on recusal motion filed in post-conviction writ of habeas corpus proceeding

dismissed for want of jurisdiction); see also Ex parte Sinegar, 324 S.W.3d 578, 580 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2010) (addressing complaint regarding trial court’s failure to act on motion to recuse filed in

a post-conviction habeas proceeding).

Accordingly, Fierro’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want

of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: February 9, 2012

2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF**

**CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OF FORESTOIL CORPORATION**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and in connection with theaccompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005that is being filed concurrently with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Forest OilCorporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that:

 

1.     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|           | /s/ DAVID H. KEYTE      |   |
|----------------|-------------------------|--------|
| August 9, 2005 | David H. Keyte          |
|           | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Motors Corporation (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John M. Devine, Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.


                                     By:  /s/ JOHN M. DEVINE
                                     ---  ------------------
                                          John M. Devine
                                          Vice Chairman and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          November 9, 2005






































                                       49
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,795,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,091,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   465,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,911,000
<PP&E>                                       5,196,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,172,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,979,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,976,000
<BONDS>                                      1,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,868,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,979,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,886,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,812,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                78,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,183,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    67,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,250,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,250,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000909992
<NAME> THE BEARD COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              52
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2860
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (57)
<INVENTORY>                                        621
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3953
<PP&E>                                           17971
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (8746)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   15656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3043
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             1200
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                        8250
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     15656
<SALES>                                           6809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  9357
<CGS>                                             4554
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     9650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (176)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    74
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (378)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (403)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (403)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
#### Maurice S. ATWATER and Betty Jean Atwater, trading and doing business as Atwater Realty, Appellants, v. Raymond W. HEALY and Mary C. Healy, his wife, Appellees.

No. 70-1155.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 9, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.