# Official Journal C 267/30 O

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 267 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4730 October 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 267

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4730 October 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 267/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 267/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M. 3589 — KÖRBER/WINKLER + DÜNNEBIER) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2004/C 267/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3512 — VNU/WPP/JV) (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2004/C 267/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/3522 — DANISH CROWN/HK/SOKOLOW) (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2004/C 267/5 | Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of tartaric acid originating in the People's Republic of China | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 267/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 267/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M. 3589 — KÖRBER/WINKLER + DÜNNEBIER) (
  1
  )

1

2

2004/C 267/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3512 — VNU/WPP/JV) (
  1
  )

1

3

2004/C 267/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/3522 — DANISH CROWN/HK/SOKOLOW) (
  1
  )

1

3

2004/C 267/5

Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of tartaric acid originating in the People's Republic of China

4

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 267/6 | Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: Integrating and Strengthening the Foundations of the European Research Area | 7 |
| 2004/C 267/7 | Call for proposals — Support for information measures relating to the common agricultural policy | 13 |

III   Notices

Commission

2004/C 267/6

Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: Integrating and Strengthening the Foundations of the European Research Area

7

2004/C 267/7

Call for proposals — Support for information measures relating to the common agricultural policy

13

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

I Information

Commission

| 30.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

29 October 2004

(2004/C 267/01)

1 euro=

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2737 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,13 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4326 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69565 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,053 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5299 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,98 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1465 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5765 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 31,535 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,04 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6748 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4309 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3248 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 40 873 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,82 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 39,94 |
| TRL | Turkish lira | 1 877 600 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7088 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5546 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9133 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8666 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1189 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 425,78 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,8017 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2737

JPY

Japanese yen

135,13

DKK

Danish krone

7,4326

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69565

SEK

Swedish krona

9,053

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5299

ISK

Iceland króna

87,98

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1465

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5765

CZK

Czech koruna

31,535

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,04

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6748

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4309

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3248

ROL

Romanian leu

40 873

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,82

SKK

Slovak koruna

39,94

TRL

Turkish lira

1 877 600

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7088

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5546

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9133

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8666

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1189

KRW

South Korean won

1 425,78

ZAR

South African rand

7,8017

---

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---

| 30.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/2

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M. 3589 — KÖRBER/WINKLER + DÜNNEBIER)

(2004/C 267/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

| 1. | On 22 October 2004, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4, and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5), of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Körber AG (‘Körber’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Winkler + Dünnebier AG (‘W+D’, Germany) by way of public bid announced on 7 October 2004. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 22 October 2004, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4, and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5), of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Körber AG (‘Körber’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Winkler + Dünnebier AG (‘W+D’, Germany) by way of public bid announced on 7 October 2004.

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for Körber: International engineering technology group active in the production and marketing of cigarette, paper, tissue, hygiene and packaging production machines, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for Körber: International engineering technology group active in the production and marketing of cigarette, paper, tissue, hygiene and packaging production machines,

| — | for W+D: production and marketing of tissue and envelopes production machines. |
| --- | --- |

—

for W+D: production and marketing of tissue and envelopes production machines.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No +32 2 2964301 or 2967244) or by post, under reference number COMP/M. 3589 — Körber/Winkler + Dünnebier, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition, |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (No +32 2 2964301 or 2967244) or by post, under reference number COMP/M. 3589 — Körber/Winkler + Dünnebier, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition,

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---

| 30.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3512 — VNU/WPP/JV)

(2004/C 267/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 15 September 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3512. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3512. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---

| 30.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/3522 — DANISH CROWN/HK/SOKOLOW)

(2004/C 267/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 13 September 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/) free of charge. This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3522. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 32004M3522. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. (http://europa.eu.int/celex)

---

| 30.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/4

---

Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of tartaric acid originating in the People's Republic of China

(2004/C 267/05)

The Commission has received a complaint pursuant to Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (1), (the basic Regulation), alleging that imports of tartaric acid, originating in the People's Republic of China (the country concerned), are being dumped and are thereby causing material injury to the Community industry.

1.   Complaint

The complaint was lodged on 24 September 2004 by the following producers (the complainant): Legré-Mante SA, Industria Chimica Valenzana SpA, Distilleries Mazzari Spa, Alcoholera Vinicola Europea SA. and Comercial Quimica Sarasa sl, representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the total Community production of tartaric acid.

2.   Product

The product allegedly being dumped is tartaric acid originating in the People's Republic of China (the product concerned), normally declared within CN code 2918 12 00. This CN code is only given for information.

3.   Allegation of dumping

In view of the provisions of Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, the complainant established normal value for the People's Republic of China on the basis of the price in a market economy country, which is mentioned in paragraph 5.1(c) of this notice. The allegation of dumping is based on a comparison of normal value, thus calculated, with the export prices of the product concerned when sold for export to the Community.

On this basis, the dumping margin calculated is significant.

4.   Allegation of injury

The complainant has provided evidence that imports of the product concerned from the People's Republic of China have increased overall in absolute terms and in terms of market share.

It is alleged that the volumes and the prices of the imported product concerned have, among other consequences, had a negative impact on the level of prices charged by the Community industry, resulting in substantial adverse effects on the overall performance and the financial situation of the Community industry.

5.   Procedure

Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that the complaint has been lodged by or on behalf of the Community industry and that there is sufficient evidence to justify the initiation of a proceeding, the Commission hereby initiates an investigation pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation.

5.1.   Procedure for the determination of dumping and injury

The investigation will determine whether the product concerned originating in the People's Republic of China is being dumped and whether this dumping has caused injury.

(a)   Questionnaires

In order to obtain the information it deems necessary for its investigation, the Commission will send questionnaires to the Community industry and to any association of producers in the Community, to the exporters/producers in the People's Republic of China, to any association of exporters/producers, to the importers, to any association of importers named in the complaint and to the authorities of the exporting country concerned.

In any event, all parties should contact the Commission forthwith by fax, but not later than the time limit set out in paragraph 6(a)(i) of this notice, in order to find out whether they are listed in the complaint and, if necessary, request a questionnaire, given that the time limit set in paragraph 6(a)(ii) of this notice applies to all such interested parties.

(b)   Collection of information and holding of hearings

All interested parties are hereby invited to make their views known, submit information other than questionnaire replies and to provide supporting evidence. This information and supporting evidence has to reach the Commission within the time limit set in paragraph 6(a)(ii) of this notice.

Furthermore, the Commission may hear interested parties, provided that they make a request showing that there are particular reasons why they should be heard. This request must be made within the time limit set in paragraph 6(a)(iii) of this notice.

(c)   Selection of the market economy country

In accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, it is envisaged to choose Argentina as an appropriate market economy country for the purpose of establishing normal value in respect of the People's Republic of China. Interested parties are hereby invited to comment on the appropriateness of this choice within the specific time limit set in paragraph 6(b) of this notice.

(d)   Market economy status

For those exporters/producers in the People's Republic of China who claim and provide sufficient evidence that they operate under market economy conditions, i.e. that they meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, normal value will be determined in accordance with Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation. Exporters/producers intending to submit duly substantiated claims must do so within the specific time limit set in paragraph 6(c) of this notice. The Commission will send claim forms to all exporters/producers in the People's Republic of China named in the complaint and to any association of exporters/producers named in the complaint, as well as to the authorities of the People's Republic of China.

5.2.   Procedure for assessment of Community interest

In accordance with Article 21 of the basic Regulation and in the event that the allegations of dumping and injury caused thereby are substantiated, a decision will be reached as to whether the adoption of anti-dumping measures would not be against the Community interest. For this reason the Community industry, importers, their representative associations, representative users and representative consumer organisations, provided that they prove that there is an objective link between their activity and the product concerned, may, within the general time limits set in paragraph 6(a)(ii) of this notice, make themselves known and provide the Commission with information. The parties which have acted in conformity with the precedent sentence may request a hearing setting the particular reasons why they should be heard within the time limit set in paragraph 6(a)(iii) of this notice. It should be noted that any information submitted pursuant to Article 21 will only be taken into account if supported by factual evidence at the time of submission.

6.   Time limits

(a)   General time limits

(i)   For parties to request a questionnaire or other claim forms

All interested parties should request a questionnaire or other claim form as soon as possible, but not later than 15 days after the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union.

(ii)   For parties to make themselves known, to submit questionnaire replies and any other information

All interested parties, if their representations are to be taken into account during the investigation, must make themselves known by contacting the Commission, present their views and submit questionnaire replies or any other information within 40 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union, unless otherwise specified. Attention is drawn to the fact that the exercise of most procedural rights set out in the basic Regulation depends on the party's making itself known within the aforementioned period.

(iii)   Hearings

All interested parties may also apply to be heard by the Commission within the same 40-day time limit.

(b)   Specific time limit for the selection of the market economy country

Parties to the investigation may wish to comment on the appropriateness of Argentina which, as mentioned in paragraph 5.1(c) of this notice, is envisaged as a market economy country for the purpose of establishing normal value in respect of the People's Republic of China. These comments must reach the Commission within 10 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union.

(c)   Specific time limit for submission of claims for market economy status and/or individual treatment

Duly substantiated claims for market economy status, as mentioned in paragraph 5.1(d) of this notice and/or for individual treatment pursuant to Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation, must reach the Commission within 21 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union.

7.   Written submissions, questionnaire replies and correspondence

All submissions and requests made by interested parties must be made in writing (not in electronic format, unless otherwise specified) and must indicate the name, address, e-mail address, telephone and fax, and/or telex numbers of the interested party. All written submissions, including the information requested in this notice, questionnaire replies and correspondence provided by interested parties on a confidential basis shall be labelled as ‘Limited’ (2) and, in accordance with Article 19(2) of the basic Regulation, shall be accompanied by a non-confidential version, which will be labelled ‘For inspection by interested parties’.

Commission address for correspondence:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Trade |
| Directorate B |
| Office: J-79 5/16 |
| B-1049 Brussels |
| Fax (32-2) 295 65 05 |
| Telex COMEU B 21877. |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Trade

Directorate B

Office: J-79 5/16

B-1049 Brussels

Fax (32-2) 295 65 05

Telex COMEU B 21877.

8.   Non-cooperation

In cases in which any interested party refuses access to or does not provide the necessary information within the time limits, or significantly impedes the investigation, provisional or final findings, affirmative or negative, may be made in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, on the basis of the facts available.

Where it is found that any interested party has supplied false or misleading information, the information shall be disregarded and use may be made of the facts available. If an interested party does not cooperate or cooperates only partially, and findings are therefore based on facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, the result may be less favourable to that party than if it had cooperated.

9.   Schedule of the investigation

The investigation will be concluded, according to Article 6(9) of the basic Regulation within 15 months of the date of the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union. According to Article 7(1) of the basic Regulation, provisional measures may be imposed no later than nine months from the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 461/2004, OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 12.

(2)  This means that the document is for internal use only. It is protected pursuant to Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43). It is a confidential document pursuant to Article 19 of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1) and Article 6 of the WTO Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the GATT 1994 (Anti-dumping Agreement).

---

III Notices

Commission

| 30.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/7

---

Call for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and Strengthening the Foundations of the European Research Area’

(2004/C 267/06)

| 1. | In accordance with Decision No 1513/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 concerning the sixth framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002 to 2006) (1), the Council adopted on 30 September 2002 the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’ (2002 to 2006) (2) (referred to as ‘the specific programme’).
  In accordance with Article 5(1) of the specific programme, the Commission of the European Communities (referred to as ‘the Commission’) adopted on 9 December 2002 a work programme (3) (referred to as ‘the work programme’) setting out in greater detail the objectives and scientific and technological priorities of the specific programme, and the timetable for implementation.
  In accordance with Article 9(1) of the Regulation (EC) No 2321/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 concerning the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in, and for the dissemination of research results for, the implementation of the European Community sixth framework programme (2002 to 2006) (4) (referred to as ‘the rules for participation’), proposals for indirect RTD actions should be submitted under the terms of calls for proposals. |
| --- | --- |

1.

In accordance with Decision No 1513/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 concerning the sixth framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002 to 2006) (1), the Council adopted on 30 September 2002 the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’ (2002 to 2006) (2) (referred to as ‘the specific programme’).

In accordance with Article 5(1) of the specific programme, the Commission of the European Communities (referred to as ‘the Commission’) adopted on 9 December 2002 a work programme (3) (referred to as ‘the work programme’) setting out in greater detail the objectives and scientific and technological priorities of the specific programme, and the timetable for implementation.

In accordance with Article 9(1) of the Regulation (EC) No 2321/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 concerning the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in, and for the dissemination of research results for, the implementation of the European Community sixth framework programme (2002 to 2006) (4) (referred to as ‘the rules for participation’), proposals for indirect RTD actions should be submitted under the terms of calls for proposals.

| 2. | The present call for proposals for indirect RTD actions (referred to as ‘the call’) comprises the present general part and the specific conditions that are described in the Annex. The Annex indicates in particular, the date of closure for the submission of proposals for indirect RTD actions, an indicative date for the completion of the evaluations, the indicative budget, the instruments and the areas concerned, the evaluation criteria for the evaluation of proposals for indirect RTD actions, the minimum number of participants, and any applicable restrictions. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The present call for proposals for indirect RTD actions (referred to as ‘the call’) comprises the present general part and the specific conditions that are described in the Annex. The Annex indicates in particular, the date of closure for the submission of proposals for indirect RTD actions, an indicative date for the completion of the evaluations, the indicative budget, the instruments and the areas concerned, the evaluation criteria for the evaluation of proposals for indirect RTD actions, the minimum number of participants, and any applicable restrictions.

| 3. | Natural or legal persons fulfilling the conditions stated in the rules for participation and that do not fall under any of the exclusion cases in the rules for participation or in Article 114(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (5) (referred to as ‘the proposers’) are invited to submit to the Commission proposals for indirect RTD actions subject to the conditions in the rules for participation and in the call concerned being fulfilled.
  The conditions of participation of the proposers will be verified within the framework of the negotiation of the indirect RTD action. Before that however, proposers will have signed a declaration stating that they do not fall under any of the cases given by Article 93(1) of the Financial Regulation. They will also have given the Commission the information listed in Article 173(2) of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (6).
  The European Community has adopted an equal opportunities policy and, on this basis, women are particularly encouraged to either submit proposals for indirect RTD actions or participate in the submission of proposals for indirect RTD actions. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Natural or legal persons fulfilling the conditions stated in the rules for participation and that do not fall under any of the exclusion cases in the rules for participation or in Article 114(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (5) (referred to as ‘the proposers’) are invited to submit to the Commission proposals for indirect RTD actions subject to the conditions in the rules for participation and in the call concerned being fulfilled.

The conditions of participation of the proposers will be verified within the framework of the negotiation of the indirect RTD action. Before that however, proposers will have signed a declaration stating that they do not fall under any of the cases given by Article 93(1) of the Financial Regulation. They will also have given the Commission the information listed in Article 173(2) of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (6).

The European Community has adopted an equal opportunities policy and, on this basis, women are particularly encouraged to either submit proposals for indirect RTD actions or participate in the submission of proposals for indirect RTD actions.

| 4. | The Commission makes available to proposers a guide for proposers relating to the call which contains information on the preparation and the submission of a proposal for an indirect RTD action. The Commission also makes available Guidelines on proposal evaluation and selection procedures (7). These guides and guidelines, as well as the work programme and other information relating to the call, can be obtained from the Commission at the following addresses:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| The FP6 Information Desk |
| Directorate General RTD |
| B-1049 Brussels |
| Internet address: www.cordis.lu/fp6 |

4.

The Commission makes available to proposers a guide for proposers relating to the call which contains information on the preparation and the submission of a proposal for an indirect RTD action. The Commission also makes available Guidelines on proposal evaluation and selection procedures (7). These guides and guidelines, as well as the work programme and other information relating to the call, can be obtained from the Commission at the following addresses:

European Commission

The FP6 Information Desk

Directorate General RTD

B-1049 Brussels

Internet address: www.cordis.lu/fp6

| 5. | Proposals for indirect RTD actions are invited to be submitted only as an electronic proposal via the web-based electronic proposal submission system (EPSS (8)). In exceptional cases however, a coordinator may request permission from the Commission to submit on paper in advance of a call deadline. This should be done by writing to one of the following addresses:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate General RTD – Unit A1 |
| B-1049 Brussels, |

5.

Proposals for indirect RTD actions are invited to be submitted only as an electronic proposal via the web-based electronic proposal submission system (EPSS (8)). In exceptional cases however, a coordinator may request permission from the Commission to submit on paper in advance of a call deadline. This should be done by writing to one of the following addresses:

European Commission

Directorate General RTD – Unit A1

B-1049 Brussels,

or e-mail address: rtd-policies@cec.eu.int. The request must be accompanied by an explanation of why the exception is being sought. Proposers wishing to use paper submission take the responsibility for ensuring that such requests for exemption and the associated procedures are completed in time for them to meet the call deadline.

Proposals for indirect RTD actions may be prepared off-line or on-line and then submitted on-line.

The EPSS software tool (for off-line or on-line usage) is available via the Cordis website www.cordis.lu. Proposals for indirect RTD actions may then be submitted on-line via the same website.

Further details on the various proposal submission procedures are given in Annex J to the Guidelines on proposal evaluation and selection procedures.

Proposals for indirect RTD actions that are submitted on-line and which are incomplete, illegible or contain viruses will be excluded.

Versions of proposals for indirect RTD actions submitted on a removable electronic storage medium (e.g. CD-ROM, diskette), by e-mail or by fax will be excluded.

| 6. | Proposals for indirect RTD actions have to reach the Commission at the latest on the closure date and at the time specified in the call concerned. Proposals for indirect RTD actions arriving after this date and time will be excluded.
  Proposals for indirect RTD actions not satisfying the conditions relating to the minimum number of participants indicated in the call concerned will be excluded.
  This also applies regarding any additional eligibility criteria given in the work programme. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Proposals for indirect RTD actions have to reach the Commission at the latest on the closure date and at the time specified in the call concerned. Proposals for indirect RTD actions arriving after this date and time will be excluded.

Proposals for indirect RTD actions not satisfying the conditions relating to the minimum number of participants indicated in the call concerned will be excluded.

This also applies regarding any additional eligibility criteria given in the work programme.

| 7. | In the case of successive submissions of the same proposal for an indirect RTD action, the Commission will examine the last version received before the closure date and time specified in the call concerned. |
| --- | --- |

7.

In the case of successive submissions of the same proposal for an indirect RTD action, the Commission will examine the last version received before the closure date and time specified in the call concerned.

| 8. | If foreseen in the relevant call, proposals for indirect RTD actions could be taken up in the framework of a future evaluation. |
| --- | --- |

8.

If foreseen in the relevant call, proposals for indirect RTD actions could be taken up in the framework of a future evaluation.

| 9. | In all correspondence relating to a call (e.g. when requesting information, or submitting a proposal for an indirect RTD action), proposers are invited to cite the relevant call identifier. |
| --- | --- |

9.

In all correspondence relating to a call (e.g. when requesting information, or submitting a proposal for an indirect RTD action), proposers are invited to cite the relevant call identifier.

---

(1)  OJ L 232, 29.8.2002, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 294, 29.10.2002, p. 1

(3)  Commission Decision C(2002) 4789, as amended by C(2003) 577, C(2003) 955, C(2003) 1952, C(2003) 3543, C(2003) 3555, C(2003) 4609, C(2003) 5183, C(2004) 433, C(2004) 2002, C(2004) 2727, C(2004) 3324 and C(2004) 4178, all decisions unpublished.

(4)  OJ L 355, 30.12.2002, p. 23

(5)  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(6)  OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 1.

(7)  C(2003) 883 of 27 March 2003, as last amended by C(2004) 3337 of 1 September 2004.

(8)  The EPSS is a tool to assist proposers to develop and submit their proposals electronically.

---

ANNEX

1.   Specific programme: ‘Integrating and strengthening the ERA’.

2.   Activity: Specific activity covering policy-orientated research under ‘Policy support and anticipating scientific and technological needs’.

3.   Call title: Scientific Support to Policies.

4.   Call identifier: FP6-2004-SSP-4.

5.   Date of publication: 30 October 2004.

6.   Closure date: 1 February 2005 at 17.00 (Brussels local time).

7.   Total indicative budget:

| Instrument (1) | EUR (millions) |
| --- | --- |
| STREP, CA and SSA | 77,8 |

Instrument (1)

EUR (millions)

STREP, CA and SSA

77,8

8.   Areas called and instruments:

| Areas under priority ‘Sustainable management of Europe’s natural resources’ | Tasks | Instruments | Indicative Community contribution
  (EUR million) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.1.B.1.1.
  Modernisation and sustainability of agriculture and forestry, including their multifunctional role in order to ensure the sustainable development and promotion of rural areas | 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, | STREP | 12 |
| 6 | CA or SSA |
| 4, 5, 10 | SSA |
| 8.1.B.1.2.
  Tools and assessment methods for sustainable agriculture and forestry management | 1 | STREP | 5 |
| 6 | CA |
| 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 | CA or SSA |
| 8.1.B.1.3.
  Modernisation and sustainability of fisheries, including aquaculture-based production systems. | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12 | STREP | 16,3 |
| 10,11 | CA |
| 13 | SSA |
| 8.1.B.1.4.
  New and more environment friendly production methods to improve animal health and welfare including research on animal diseases such as foot-and-mouth disease, swine fever and development of marker vaccines | 1 | STREP | 1,9 |
| 2 | CA |
| 3,4 | SSA |
| 8.1.B.1.5.
  Environmental assessment (soil, water, air, noise, including the effects of chemical substances) | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 | STREP | 10,4 |
| 8.1.B.1.6.
  Assessment of environmental technologies for support of policy decisions, in particular concerning effective but low-cost technologies in the context of fulfilling environmental legislation | 1, 2 | STREP | 1,1 |

Areas under priority ‘Sustainable management of Europe’s natural resources’

Tasks

Instruments

Indicative Community contribution

(EUR million)

8.1.B.1.1.

Modernisation and sustainability of agriculture and forestry, including their multifunctional role in order to ensure the sustainable development and promotion of rural areas

1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9,

STREP

12

6

CA or SSA

4, 5, 10

SSA

8.1.B.1.2.

Tools and assessment methods for sustainable agriculture and forestry management

1

STREP

5

6

CA

2, 3, 4, 5, 7

CA or SSA

8.1.B.1.3.

Modernisation and sustainability of fisheries, including aquaculture-based production systems.

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12

STREP

16,3

10,11

CA

13

SSA

8.1.B.1.4.

New and more environment friendly production methods to improve animal health and welfare including research on animal diseases such as foot-and-mouth disease, swine fever and development of marker vaccines

1

STREP

1,9

2

CA

3,4

SSA

8.1.B.1.5.

Environmental assessment (soil, water, air, noise, including the effects of chemical substances)

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

STREP

10,4

8.1.B.1.6.

Assessment of environmental technologies for support of policy decisions, in particular concerning effective but low-cost technologies in the context of fulfilling environmental legislation

1, 2

STREP

1,1

| Areas under priority ‘Providing health, security and opportunity to the people of Europe’ | Tasks | Instruments | Indicative Community contribution
  (EUR million) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.1.B.2.1.
  Health determinants and the provision of high quality and sustainable health care services and pension systems (in particular in the context of ageing and demographic change) | CLOSED | CLOSED | CLOSED |
| 8.1.B.2.2.
  Public health issues, including epidemiology contributing to disease prevention and responses to emerging rare and communicable diseases, allergies, procedures for secure blood and organ donations, non-animal test methods | CLOSED | CLOSED | CLOSED |
| 8.1.B.2.3.
  The impact of environmental issues on health (including safety at work and methods for risk assessment and the mitigation of risks of natural disasters to people) | 1, 2, 3 | CA | 2,75 |
| 8.1.B.2.4.
  Quality of life issues relating to handicapped/disabled people (including equal access facilities) | CLOSED | CLOSED | CLOSED |
| 8.1.B.2.5.
  Comparative research of factors underlying migration and refugee flows, including illegal immigration and trafficking in human beings | 1, 2, 3, 4 | STREP or CA | 4 |
| 8.1.B.2.6.
  Improved means to anticipate crime trends and causes, and to assess the effectiveness of crime prevention policies; assessment of new challenges related to illicit drug use | 1, 2, 3 | STREP or CA | 3 |
| 8.1.B.2.7.
  Issues related to civil protection (including biosecurity and protection against risks arising from terrorist attacks), and crisis management | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | CA | 2,75 |
| 6, 7 | SSA |

Areas under priority ‘Providing health, security and opportunity to the people of Europe’

Tasks

Instruments

Indicative Community contribution

(EUR million)

8.1.B.2.1.

Health determinants and the provision of high quality and sustainable health care services and pension systems (in particular in the context of ageing and demographic change)

CLOSED

CLOSED

CLOSED

8.1.B.2.2.

Public health issues, including epidemiology contributing to disease prevention and responses to emerging rare and communicable diseases, allergies, procedures for secure blood and organ donations, non-animal test methods

CLOSED

CLOSED

CLOSED

8.1.B.2.3.

The impact of environmental issues on health (including safety at work and methods for risk assessment and the mitigation of risks of natural disasters to people)

1, 2, 3

CA

2,75

8.1.B.2.4.

Quality of life issues relating to handicapped/disabled people (including equal access facilities)

CLOSED

CLOSED

CLOSED

8.1.B.2.5.

Comparative research of factors underlying migration and refugee flows, including illegal immigration and trafficking in human beings

1, 2, 3, 4

STREP or CA

4

8.1.B.2.6.

Improved means to anticipate crime trends and causes, and to assess the effectiveness of crime prevention policies; assessment of new challenges related to illicit drug use

1, 2, 3

STREP or CA

3

8.1.B.2.7.

Issues related to civil protection (including biosecurity and protection against risks arising from terrorist attacks), and crisis management

1, 2, 3, 4, 5

CA

2,75

6, 7

SSA

| Areas under priority ‘Underpinning the economic potential and cohesion of a larger and more integrated European Union’ | Tasks | Instruments | Indicative Community contribution
  (EUR million) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.1.B.3.1.
  Underpinning European integration, sustainable development, competitiveness and trade policies (including improved means to assess economic development and cohesion) | CLOSED | CLOSED | CLOSED |
| 8.1.B.3.2.
  The development of tools, indicators and operational parameters for assessing sustainable transport and energy systems performance (economic, environmental and social) | 6, 7 | CA | 3.5 (transport tasks 1-4) + 3 (energy tasks 5-9) = 6,5 |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9 | SSA |
| 8.1.B.3.3.
  Global security analysis and validation systems for transport and research relating to accident risks and safety in mobility systems | 1 | CA | 3,5 |
| 8.1.B.3.4.
  Forecasting and developing innovative policies for sustainability in the medium and long term | 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 | STREP | 3,8 |
| 3 | CA |
| 8.1.B.3.5.
  Information society issues (such as management and protection of digital assets, and inclusive access to the information society) | 1, 2, 3 | STREP or SSA | 1,9 |
| 8.1.B.3.6.
  The protection of cultural heritage and associated conservation strategies | 1, 2, 3, 4 | STREP | 2,9 |
| 5 | SSA |
| 8.1.B.3.7.
  Improved quality, accessibility and dissemination of European statistics | CLOSED | CLOSED | CLOSED |

Areas under priority ‘Underpinning the economic potential and cohesion of a larger and more integrated European Union’

Tasks

Instruments

Indicative Community contribution

(EUR million)

8.1.B.3.1.

Underpinning European integration, sustainable development, competitiveness and trade policies (including improved means to assess economic development and cohesion)

CLOSED

CLOSED

CLOSED

8.1.B.3.2.

The development of tools, indicators and operational parameters for assessing sustainable transport and energy systems performance (economic, environmental and social)

6, 7

CA

3.5 (transport tasks 1-4) + 3 (energy tasks 5-9) = 6,5

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9

SSA

8.1.B.3.3.

Global security analysis and validation systems for transport and research relating to accident risks and safety in mobility systems

1

CA

3,5

8.1.B.3.4.

Forecasting and developing innovative policies for sustainability in the medium and long term

1, 2, 4, 5, 6

STREP

3,8

3

CA

8.1.B.3.5.

Information society issues (such as management and protection of digital assets, and inclusive access to the information society)

1, 2, 3

STREP or SSA

1,9

8.1.B.3.6.

The protection of cultural heritage and associated conservation strategies

1, 2, 3, 4

STREP

2,9

5

SSA

8.1.B.3.7.

Improved quality, accessibility and dissemination of European statistics

CLOSED

CLOSED

CLOSED

9.   Minimum number of participants
   (2):

| Instrument | Minimum number of participants |
| --- | --- |
| STREP and CA | Three independent legal entities from three different MS or AS, with at least two MS or ACC |
| SSA | One legal entity from a MS or AS |

Instrument

Minimum number of participants

STREP and CA

Three independent legal entities from three different MS or AS, with at least two MS or ACC

SSA

One legal entity from a MS or AS

10.   Restriction on participation: None.

11.   Consortium agreement: participants in RTD actions resulting from this call are not required to conclude a consortium agreement.

12.   Evaluation procedure:

| — | The evaluation shall follow a single-stage procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

The evaluation shall follow a single-stage procedure.

| — | Proposals will not be evaluated anonymously. |
| --- | --- |

—

Proposals will not be evaluated anonymously.

13.   Evaluation criteria: See Annex B of the work programme for the applicable criteria (including their individual weights and thresholds and the overall threshold) per instrument.

14.   Indicative evaluation and contractual timetable: Evaluation results: considering the wide scope of SSP and the need to ensure coherence with thematic priorities of the work programme, evaluations will be carried out at various dates and the results are not expected to become available earlier than May 2005.

Contract signature: it is estimated that the first contracts related to this call will come into force in autumn 2005.

---

(1)  STREP = Specific targeted research project; CA = Coordination action; SSA = Specific support action.

(2)  MS = Member States of the EU; AS (incl. ACC) = associated States; ACC = associated candidate countries.

Any legal entity established in a Member State or associated State and which is made up of the requested number of participant may be the sole participant in an indirect action.

---

| 30.10.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/13

---

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

Support for information measures relating to the common agricultural policy

(2004/C 267/07)

1.   BACKGROUND

On 17 April 2000, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 814/2000 on information measures relating to the common agricultural policy (1), which defines the type and content of the measures the Community may finance.

As part of a new and simplified approach, the Commission has laid down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 814/2000 in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2208/2002 (2). In accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 2208/2002, modified by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1820/2004 (3), this call for proposals specifies the priority topics and measures and the deadlines for submitting applications and commencing the measures concerned.

This is a call for proposals for funding annual work programmes or individual measures from appropriations in the 2005 budget.

2.   PRIORITY MEASURES FOR 2005

Under this call for proposals the Commission wishes to give priority to communicating about issues relating to the quality of European agricultural products and the ways in which the common agricultural policy (CAP) and the common market organisations (CMOs) support the integration of the environmental requirements into the CAP and the assurance and continuous improvement of the quality of products.

It will be for applicants to demonstrate which channel or channels of communication they believe are most appropriate in this field for particular issues and particular target audiences, and why. They are also asked to submit a Media Plan for their proposed projects, which should include details of project implementation, message delivery and measurement of effectiveness. In selecting successful applications, particular attention will be paid to the Media Plan, as described in Annex II, point 6.

2.1.   Messages to be communicated

The main messages the Commission wishes to communicate to the target audiences are related to the following aspects of the CAP:

| — | CAP reform: new instruments, namely single payments and decoupling, |
| --- | --- |

—

CAP reform: new instruments, namely single payments and decoupling,

| — | the Commission's reform proposals for rural development policies, |
| --- | --- |

—

the Commission's reform proposals for rural development policies,

| — | links between agricultural support and compliance with standards for protection of the environment and animal welfare (cross-compliance), |
| --- | --- |

—

links between agricultural support and compliance with standards for protection of the environment and animal welfare (cross-compliance),

| — | strengthening of support for traditional farming systems with a high environmental value, including systems for organic production, |
| --- | --- |

—

strengthening of support for traditional farming systems with a high environmental value, including systems for organic production,

| — | reinforcement of the competitiveness of the EU's agriculture, |
| --- | --- |

—

reinforcement of the competitiveness of the EU's agriculture,

| — | targeting of products and services sought by the public and making them more market-oriented, |
| --- | --- |

—

targeting of products and services sought by the public and making them more market-oriented,

| — | benefits to the trade and consumers of the guarantees offered by the Community systems for geographical indications and specified production methods, |
| --- | --- |

—

benefits to the trade and consumers of the guarantees offered by the Community systems for geographical indications and specified production methods,

| — | benefits of European quality policy and labelling systems for export promotion and access to markets in third countries, |
| --- | --- |

—

benefits of European quality policy and labelling systems for export promotion and access to markets in third countries,

| — | WTO: Doha round disciplines. |
| --- | --- |

—

WTO: Doha round disciplines.

Full details of the reform of the common agricultural policy can be found at the following address:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/

Preference will be given to projects centered on specific examples in particular sectors which illustrate the practical aspects of implementing the objectives outlined above and are clearly relevant to the target audience.

2.2.   Target audiences

The target audiences for projects under this call for proposals are:

| — | the entire farming and food sector in Europe, including consumers, |
| --- | --- |

—

the entire farming and food sector in Europe, including consumers,

| — | the general public. |
| --- | --- |

—

the general public.

Applicants should specify whether their project proposal will target audiences in more than one country, and if so, which countries and by what means.

2.3.   Channels of communication

In particular, the Commission wishes the following communication channels to be used:

| — | Broadcast media, both radio and television, at local, regional and national level; where specific broadcast coverage is proposed, the Commission will wish to see in advance a degree of certainty that coverage can be obtained. Projects involving non-broadcast video or audio for direct distribution are admissible. |
| --- | --- |

—

Broadcast media, both radio and television, at local, regional and national level; where specific broadcast coverage is proposed, the Commission will wish to see in advance a degree of certainty that coverage can be obtained. Projects involving non-broadcast video or audio for direct distribution are admissible.

| — | The Internet, which is growing in importance as a source of information and comment for many EU citizens. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Internet, which is growing in importance as a source of information and comment for many EU citizens.

| — | Conferences and seminars, which involve either or both of the audiences identified above. |
| --- | --- |

—

Conferences and seminars, which involve either or both of the audiences identified above.

| — | The written press: the Commission already has good direct contacts with the written press in the EU. However, the projects launched as a result of this call for proposals are themselves expected to attract press interest. Applicants should demonstrate how they propose to encourage this interest. |
| --- | --- |

—

The written press: the Commission already has good direct contacts with the written press in the EU. However, the projects launched as a result of this call for proposals are themselves expected to attract press interest. Applicants should demonstrate how they propose to encourage this interest.

The Commission will be looking for projects with high added value, where more than one element of the media can be utilised. For example, a conference might be attended by delegates, televised at a later date and the issues raised reported in local or regional press and posted on the Internet.

2.4.   Media Plan

The Media Plan described in Annex II, point 6 should specify how the following aspects of the project are to be achieved:

| — | Implementation: how will the project be planned, managed, and kept within budget? What timescales are envisaged? What is the role foreseen for Commission staff? |
| --- | --- |

—

Implementation: how will the project be planned, managed, and kept within budget? What timescales are envisaged? What is the role foreseen for Commission staff?

| — | Message delivery: which message(s) will the project deliver? To which audiences? Which media will be utilised and how? |
| --- | --- |

—

Message delivery: which message(s) will the project deliver? To which audiences? Which media will be utilised and how?

| — | Measurement of effectiveness: preference will be given to proposals which allow for measuring how effectively messages have been communicated (for example, how much an audience has appreciated a seminar or radio programme, rather than just the size of the audience; the advisability of covering an issue on the Internet, rather than the extent of the coverage). |
| --- | --- |

—

Measurement of effectiveness: preference will be given to proposals which allow for measuring how effectively messages have been communicated (for example, how much an audience has appreciated a seminar or radio programme, rather than just the size of the audience; the advisability of covering an issue on the Internet, rather than the extent of the coverage).

The Commission accepts that for smaller projects (costing up to EUR 30 000) an evaluation after the execution of the measure is optional.

3.   GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING APPLICATIONS

3.1.   How to prepare an application

Before applying, applicants should carefully read Council Regulation (EC) No 814/2000, Commission Regulation (EC) No 2208/2002 and all annexes to this call for proposals.

Applications for financing should be submitted in one of the official languages of the Community. A translation in English or French must also be included.

Applications must be drawn up by using the appropriate forms available at the following internet address:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/grants/capinfo/index_en.htm

3.2.   When and to whom to send your application

| 1. | Applicants will send by 17 January 2005 one copy of their full application with the supporting documents, by registered post with acknowledgement of receipt (the postmark on the envelope being taken as proof of the date of sending) to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Unit AGRI. B.1 |
| Call for proposals (2004/C 267/07) |
| For attention Mr E. Leguen de Lacroix |
| L130 4/148A |
| B-1049 Brussels |

1.

Applicants will send by 17 January 2005 one copy of their full application with the supporting documents, by registered post with acknowledgement of receipt (the postmark on the envelope being taken as proof of the date of sending) to the following address:

European Commission

Unit AGRI. B.1

Call for proposals (2004/C 267/07)

For attention Mr E. Leguen de Lacroix

L130 4/148A

B-1049 Brussels

The application letter and the budget must be signed and dated by the legally authorised representative within the applicant organisation. The documents to be sent are listed in Annex I.

| 2. | At the same time and no later than 24.00 (Brussels time) on 17 January 2005, applicants will also send an electronic copy, identical to the one stated at point 1, to the following e-mail address:
  AGRI-GRANTS@cec.eu.int
  Should the applications sent under 1 and 2 not be identical, the application sent by post shall take precedence over the application sent by e-mail.
  Applications sent after the due date as defined under 1 and 2, and/or sent to other postal or electronic addresses than the one indicated under 1 and 2 respectively, will be rejected. |
| --- | --- |

2.

At the same time and no later than 24.00 (Brussels time) on 17 January 2005, applicants will also send an electronic copy, identical to the one stated at point 1, to the following e-mail address:

AGRI-GRANTS@cec.eu.int

Should the applications sent under 1 and 2 not be identical, the application sent by post shall take precedence over the application sent by e-mail.

Applications sent after the due date as defined under 1 and 2, and/or sent to other postal or electronic addresses than the one indicated under 1 and 2 respectively, will be rejected.

3.3.   Procedure followed by the Commission for dealing with your application and timetable

The Commission will first proceed to the verification of the existence of all documents required to apply for a grant under this call for proposal as listed in Annex I.

Subsequently, an ad-hoc evaluation committee will proceed to the evaluation of the applications. This evaluation consists of four successive stages as described below. Only applications meeting the requirement of one stage will pass on to the next.

| 1. | Evaluation of the applicants under the eligibility criteria as indicated in Annex II; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Evaluation of the applicants under the eligibility criteria as indicated in Annex II;

| 2. | Evaluation of the applicants under the exclusion criteria as indicated at Article 5 of Commission regulation 2208/2002 and on the basis of the documents submitted under point 3 of Annex I; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Evaluation of the applicants under the exclusion criteria as indicated at Article 5 of Commission regulation 2208/2002 and on the basis of the documents submitted under point 3 of Annex I;

| 3. | Evaluation of the applicants under the selection criteria as indicated in Annex III, point 1; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Evaluation of the applicants under the selection criteria as indicated in Annex III, point 1;

| 4. | Evaluation of the applications in the light of the award criteria as indicated in Annex III, point 2.
  Following the evaluation, the evaluation committee will draw up the list of cost-effective measures among those of highest technical quality.
  Measures will be considered of highest technical quality if they receive 60 out of 100 points allocated, as described in Annexe III, point 2, and have at least 40 % of the points available for each criterion. The Commission may raise the minimum acceptable rating in the light of the budget ressources available.
  The cost-effectiveness of the measure will be calculated by dividing the grant applied for by the total number of points obtained in the evaluation of the award criteria.
  The decision of the Commission to award a grant may differ from the proposal issued by the evaluation committee.
  The Commission expects to draw up the list of beneficiaries and the amounts approved by 30 June 2005.
  If the grant requested is awarded, the beneficiary will receive a grant agreement, denominated in euros, specifying the conditions and level of financing.
  If the grant requested is not awarded, the beneficiary will receive a written information giving the reasons for the rejection of the application, with reference in particular to the eligibility, selection and award criteria. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Evaluation of the applications in the light of the award criteria as indicated in Annex III, point 2.

Following the evaluation, the evaluation committee will draw up the list of cost-effective measures among those of highest technical quality.

Measures will be considered of highest technical quality if they receive 60 out of 100 points allocated, as described in Annexe III, point 2, and have at least 40 % of the points available for each criterion. The Commission may raise the minimum acceptable rating in the light of the budget ressources available.

The cost-effectiveness of the measure will be calculated by dividing the grant applied for by the total number of points obtained in the evaluation of the award criteria.

The decision of the Commission to award a grant may differ from the proposal issued by the evaluation committee.

The Commission expects to draw up the list of beneficiaries and the amounts approved by 30 June 2005.

If the grant requested is awarded, the beneficiary will receive a grant agreement, denominated in euros, specifying the conditions and level of financing.

If the grant requested is not awarded, the beneficiary will receive a written information giving the reasons for the rejection of the application, with reference in particular to the eligibility, selection and award criteria.

4.   FINANCING

Eligible costs are defined in annexe IV. The contribution from the Commission is limited to 50 % of the total eligible costs. In exceptional cases, this may rise to 75 % on the terms laid down in Article 7(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2208/2002.

A measure will be recognised as being of exceptional interest as referred to in Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2208/2002 if it is awarded at least 75 % for award criteria 1 to 4 as set out in Annex III, point 2.

No prefinancing will be allowed for the measures awarded a grant under this call for proposals.

Selecting an application does not commit the Commission to granting the full amount requested by the applicant. In no circumstances will the grant exceed the amount requested.

---

(1)  OJ L 100, 20.4.2000, p. 7.

(2)  OJ L 337, 13.12.2002, p. 21.

(3)  OJ L 320, 21.10.2004, p. 14.

---

ANNEX I

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO APPLY FOR A GRANT

| (1) | Duly filled application forms ((i) letter, (ii) forms 1, 2, 3 and 4, (iii) budget including expenditure budget and income table, (iv) financial identification sheet and (v) legal entity identification sheet). The letter, the budget including expenditure budget and income table, the financial identification sheet and the legal entity identification sheet have to be signed and dated by the legally authorised representative within the applicant organisation.
  In the event of an annual work programme, which may contain two to five specific information measures as defined in Article 2(b) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2208/2002, one form 4 and one budget (expenditure budget and income table) will be filled in for each of the measures included in the work programme. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Duly filled application forms ((i) letter, (ii) forms 1, 2, 3 and 4, (iii) budget including expenditure budget and income table, (iv) financial identification sheet and (v) legal entity identification sheet). The letter, the budget including expenditure budget and income table, the financial identification sheet and the legal entity identification sheet have to be signed and dated by the legally authorised representative within the applicant organisation.

In the event of an annual work programme, which may contain two to five specific information measures as defined in Article 2(b) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2208/2002, one form 4 and one budget (expenditure budget and income table) will be filled in for each of the measures included in the work programme.

| (2) | For applicants and applicant's partners: articles of association and most recent general report, plus, where applicable, the organisation chart and the rules of procedure, if these are referred to in the articles of association. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

For applicants and applicant's partners: articles of association and most recent general report, plus, where applicable, the organisation chart and the rules of procedure, if these are referred to in the articles of association.

| (3) | For applicants (except public bodies):






  (a) | Declaration on honour, signed and dated by the legally authorised representative within the applicant organisation, stating that the applicant is not in one of the following situations:






  — | they are bankrupt or being wound up, are having their affairs administered by the courts, have entered into an arrangement with creditors, have suspended business activities, are the subject of proceedings concerning those matters, or are in any analogous situation arising from a similar procedure provided for in national legislation or regulations, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

(3)

For applicants (except public bodies):

(a)

Declaration on honour, signed and dated by the legally authorised representative within the applicant organisation, stating that the applicant is not in one of the following situations:

—

they are bankrupt or being wound up, are having their affairs administered by the courts, have entered into an arrangement with creditors, have suspended business activities, are the subject of proceedings concerning those matters, or are in any analogous situation arising from a similar procedure provided for in national legislation or regulations,

| — | they have been convicted of an offence concerning their professional conduct by a judgment which has the force of res judicata, |
| --- | --- |

—

they have been convicted of an offence concerning their professional conduct by a judgment which has the force of res judicata,

| — | they have been guilty of grave professional misconduct proven by any means which the contracting authority can justify, |
| --- | --- |

—

they have been guilty of grave professional misconduct proven by any means which the contracting authority can justify,

| — | they have not fulfilled obligations relating to the payment of social security contributions or the payment of taxes in accordance with the legal provisions of the country in which they are established or with those of the country of the contracting authority or those of the country where the contract is to be performed, |
| --- | --- |

—

they have not fulfilled obligations relating to the payment of social security contributions or the payment of taxes in accordance with the legal provisions of the country in which they are established or with those of the country of the contracting authority or those of the country where the contract is to be performed,

| — | they have been the subject of a judgment which has the force of res judicata for fraud, corruption, involvement in a criminal organisation or any other illegal activity detrimental to the Communities' financial interests, |
| --- | --- |

—

they have been the subject of a judgment which has the force of res judicata for fraud, corruption, involvement in a criminal organisation or any other illegal activity detrimental to the Communities' financial interests,

| — | following another procurement procedure or grant award procedure financed by the Community budget, they have been declared to be in serious breach of contract for failure to comply with their contractual obligations; |
| --- | --- |

—

following another procurement procedure or grant award procedure financed by the Community budget, they have been declared to be in serious breach of contract for failure to comply with their contractual obligations;

| (b) | recent excerpt of the applicant's enrolment in the professional register provided for under the legislation of the Member State in which they are established; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

recent excerpt of the applicant's enrolment in the professional register provided for under the legislation of the Member State in which they are established;

| (c) | certification, less than 90 days old from the deadline for submission of the application, from the social security body of the country where the applicant is established, indicating that the applicant has paid its contributions. Where no such certificate is issued in the country concerned, it may be replaced by a sworn or, failing that, a solemn statement made by the applicant before a judicial or administrative authority, a notary or a qualified professional body in his country of origin or provenance; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

certification, less than 90 days old from the deadline for submission of the application, from the social security body of the country where the applicant is established, indicating that the applicant has paid its contributions. Where no such certificate is issued in the country concerned, it may be replaced by a sworn or, failing that, a solemn statement made by the applicant before a judicial or administrative authority, a notary or a qualified professional body in his country of origin or provenance;

| (d) | certification, less than 90 days old from the deadline for submission of the application, issued by the tax authority in the country where the applicant is established indicating that the applicant has paid its taxes and dues. Where no such certificate is issued in the country concerned, it may be replaced by a sworn or, failing that, a solemn statement made by the applicant before a judicial or administrative authority, a notary or a qualified professional body in his country of origin or provenance; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

certification, less than 90 days old from the deadline for submission of the application, issued by the tax authority in the country where the applicant is established indicating that the applicant has paid its taxes and dues. Where no such certificate is issued in the country concerned, it may be replaced by a sworn or, failing that, a solemn statement made by the applicant before a judicial or administrative authority, a notary or a qualified professional body in his country of origin or provenance;

| (e) | extract from the judicial record, less than 90 days old from the deadline for submission of the application, or, failing this, an equivalent document issued by the judicial or administrative authority in the country of origin or residence and less than 90 days old from the deadline for submission of the application, proving that the applicant is not involved in proceedings relating to bankruptcy, judicial settlement, liquidation or composition with creditors. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

extract from the judicial record, less than 90 days old from the deadline for submission of the application, or, failing this, an equivalent document issued by the judicial or administrative authority in the country of origin or residence and less than 90 days old from the deadline for submission of the application, proving that the applicant is not involved in proceedings relating to bankruptcy, judicial settlement, liquidation or composition with creditors.

| (4) | For applicants and applicant's partners: form relating to conflicts of interest drawn up in accordance with the model available at the internet address indicated under 3.1 of this call for proposals. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

For applicants and applicant's partners: form relating to conflicts of interest drawn up in accordance with the model available at the internet address indicated under 3.1 of this call for proposals.

| (5) | For applicants (except public bodies) and applicant's partners: balance sheets and annual accounts for the last three financial years for which the accounts have been closed. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

For applicants (except public bodies) and applicant's partners: balance sheets and annual accounts for the last three financial years for which the accounts have been closed.

| (6) | For applicants (except public bodies) and applicant's partners: certificate from the bank regarding financial situation. This certificate takes the form of a letter from the bank stating the bank's opinion on the applicant and/or supplier/subcontractor's financial situation, in particular on whether the applicant and/or supplier/subcontractor would be able to finance the amount requested in the application. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

For applicants (except public bodies) and applicant's partners: certificate from the bank regarding financial situation. This certificate takes the form of a letter from the bank stating the bank's opinion on the applicant and/or supplier/subcontractor's financial situation, in particular on whether the applicant and/or supplier/subcontractor would be able to finance the amount requested in the application.

| (7) | For applicants (where the grant requested is equal or higher than EUR 300 000): an external audit report, produced by an approved auditor, certifying the accounts for the last closed financial year and giving an assessment of the financial viability of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

For applicants (where the grant requested is equal or higher than EUR 300 000): an external audit report, produced by an approved auditor, certifying the accounts for the last closed financial year and giving an assessment of the financial viability of the applicant.

| (8) | For applicants and applicant's partners: curriculum vitae of the staff who will carry out the preparation, implementation, follow-up and evaluation of the proposed measure. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

For applicants and applicant's partners: curriculum vitae of the staff who will carry out the preparation, implementation, follow-up and evaluation of the proposed measure.

| (9) | Where the applicant intends to use suppliers/subcontractors and where the amount of all services to be rendered exceeds EUR 10 000, the applicant must present at least three tenders showing that the supplier/subcontractor selected represents the best value for money and must justify that choice where the tender selected is not the cheapest. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

Where the applicant intends to use suppliers/subcontractors and where the amount of all services to be rendered exceeds EUR 10 000, the applicant must present at least three tenders showing that the supplier/subcontractor selected represents the best value for money and must justify that choice where the tender selected is not the cheapest.

| (10) | In the event of contributions from other providers of funds (including partners) to the measure proposed, proof of such contributions (which must consist at least of an official attestation of financing from each of the expected providers mentioning the title of the measure and the amount to be contributed). |
| --- | --- |

(10)

In the event of contributions from other providers of funds (including partners) to the measure proposed, proof of such contributions (which must consist at least of an official attestation of financing from each of the expected providers mentioning the title of the measure and the amount to be contributed).

---

ANNEX II

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE PROPOSED MEASURES

| (1) | Grant applications for annual work programmes shall be between EUR 50 000 and EUR 500 000. The grant requested for each specific measure contained in each programme shall be comprised within the limits indicated at 2. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Grant applications for annual work programmes shall be between EUR 50 000 and EUR 500 000. The grant requested for each specific measure contained in each programme shall be comprised within the limits indicated at 2.

| (2) | Grant applications for specific measures shall be between EUR 12 500 and EUR 100 000. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Grant applications for specific measures shall be between EUR 12 500 and EUR 100 000.

| (3) | Annual work programmes and specific measures will be implemented (including preparation, implementation, follow-up and evaluation) between 1 July 2005 and 30 June 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annual work programmes and specific measures will be implemented (including preparation, implementation, follow-up and evaluation) between 1 July 2005 and 30 June 2006.

| (4) | Not more than one annual work programme or one specific measure may be received from any applicant in one budget year. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Not more than one annual work programme or one specific measure may be received from any applicant in one budget year.

| (5) | Apart from the measures listed in Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 814/2000, the following are not eligible:






  (a) | profit-making measures; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(5)

Apart from the measures listed in Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 814/2000, the following are not eligible:

(a)

profit-making measures;

| (b) | general assemblies or statutory meetings. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

general assemblies or statutory meetings.

| (6) | The media plan must be submitted for each specific measure, and must contain:






  (a) | a detailed agenda (for seminars and conferences) or script (for publications and audiovisual productions), specifying, inter alia, the particular subjects to be dealt with, and, where possible, the names and vocational experience of the contributors with respect to the subjects they are to deal with, and accompanied by the planned timetable for the measure and, where applicable, the place of realisation; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(6)

The media plan must be submitted for each specific measure, and must contain:

(a)

a detailed agenda (for seminars and conferences) or script (for publications and audiovisual productions), specifying, inter alia, the particular subjects to be dealt with, and, where possible, the names and vocational experience of the contributors with respect to the subjects they are to deal with, and accompanied by the planned timetable for the measure and, where applicable, the place of realisation;

| (b) | the detailed description of the measure, including:






  — | a description of the identified information needs and of the results excepted from carrying out the measure (ex ante evaluation), |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

the detailed description of the measure, including:

—

a description of the identified information needs and of the results excepted from carrying out the measure (ex ante evaluation),

| — | the main messages to be put across by the measure, |
| --- | --- |

—

the main messages to be put across by the measure,

| — | the target audience(s), |
| --- | --- |

—

the target audience(s),

| — | the means of communication to be used and the way they will be used, |
| --- | --- |

—

the means of communication to be used and the way they will be used,

| — | a detailed plan for the assessment of the results after the execution of the measure (ex post evaluation), in particular the indicators or criteria enabling measurement in retrospect of the impact of the measure carried out as well as the impact of the chosen dissemination policy (optional for measures with a budget of EUR 30 000 or less). |
| --- | --- |

—

a detailed plan for the assessment of the results after the execution of the measure (ex post evaluation), in particular the indicators or criteria enabling measurement in retrospect of the impact of the measure carried out as well as the impact of the chosen dissemination policy (optional for measures with a budget of EUR 30 000 or less).

| (7) | Budget






  (a) | Both the income table and the expenditure budget (expenditure side) must be drawn up in euros using the original documents provided at the internet address indicated at 3.1 of this call for proposals; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(7)

Budget

(a)

Both the income table and the expenditure budget (expenditure side) must be drawn up in euros using the original documents provided at the internet address indicated at 3.1 of this call for proposals;

| (b) | In addition, the forward budget must:






  — | have revenue and expenditure in balance. The expenditure side of the budget will show clearly the costs which are eligible for financing as indicated in Annex IV, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

In addition, the forward budget must:

—

have revenue and expenditure in balance. The expenditure side of the budget will show clearly the costs which are eligible for financing as indicated in Annex IV,

| — | indicate the calculations and specifications used in drawing it up, except for the flat-rate amount allowed for overheads and the provision for unforeseen costs, |
| --- | --- |

—

indicate the calculations and specifications used in drawing it up, except for the flat-rate amount allowed for overheads and the provision for unforeseen costs,

| — | be presented without VAT if the applicant is subject to VAT and entitled to deduct it, |
| --- | --- |

—

be presented without VAT if the applicant is subject to VAT and entitled to deduct it,

| — | include on the revenue side:






  — | the direct contribution from the applicant, |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

include on the revenue side:

—

the direct contribution from the applicant,

| — | details of any contributions from other providers of funds, |
| --- | --- |

—

details of any contributions from other providers of funds,

| — | all revenue generated by the project, including, where appropriate, the fees required of participants, |
| --- | --- |

—

all revenue generated by the project, including, where appropriate, the fees required of participants,

| — | the requested Commission funding, where appropriate broken down by application submitted to the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

—

the requested Commission funding, where appropriate broken down by application submitted to the Commission.

---

ANNEX III

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

SELECTION AND AWARD CRITERIA

1.   Selection criteria

In order to demonstrate their technical capacity applicants must demonstrate for themselves and for the partners that:

| — | they have the necessary technical skills of direct relevance to the preparation, implementation, follow-up and evaluation of the type of measure proposed; |
| --- | --- |

—

they have the necessary technical skills of direct relevance to the preparation, implementation, follow-up and evaluation of the type of measure proposed;

| — | they have at least three years experience in dealing with the subject(s) proposed. |
| --- | --- |

—

they have at least three years experience in dealing with the subject(s) proposed.

In order to demonstrate their financial capacity applicants must demonstrate for themselves and for the partners that:

| — | they have the adequate solvency, based on the last three closed balance sheets/annual accounts as indicated in Annex I(5) and based on the certificate of the bank regarding financial situation as indicated in Annex I(6), to maintain their activity throughout the period during which the measure is being carried out and to participate in its funding. The liquidity (current assets minus current liabilities) must be equivalent to at least 100 % of the grant applied for. |
| --- | --- |

—

they have the adequate solvency, based on the last three closed balance sheets/annual accounts as indicated in Annex I(5) and based on the certificate of the bank regarding financial situation as indicated in Annex I(6), to maintain their activity throughout the period during which the measure is being carried out and to participate in its funding. The liquidity (current assets minus current liabilities) must be equivalent to at least 100 % of the grant applied for.

2.   Award criteria

Each measure will be evaluated in the light of the following criteria:

| 1) | (maximum 25 points) The relevance and general interest of the measure are to be appraised, in particular, in the light of:






  — | the extent to which the goals and the content of the measure are in line with the objectives laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 814/2000 and cover the priority topics set out in the call for proposals; |
| --- | --- | --- |

1)

(maximum 25 points) The relevance and general interest of the measure are to be appraised, in particular, in the light of:

—

the extent to which the goals and the content of the measure are in line with the objectives laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 814/2000 and cover the priority topics set out in the call for proposals;

| 2) | (maximum 25 points) The Community dimension and value added are to be appraised, in particular, in the light of:






  — | the number of countries covered by the measure (10 points), |
| --- | --- | --- |

2)

(maximum 25 points) The Community dimension and value added are to be appraised, in particular, in the light of:

—

the number of countries covered by the measure (10 points),

| — | the dimension and representativeness of the target audience in relation to the type of measure (10 points), |
| --- | --- |

—

the dimension and representativeness of the target audience in relation to the type of measure (10 points),

| — | the number and representativeness of the organisations – not including subcontractors – involved in drawing up, implementing and disseminating the measure (five points). |
| --- | --- |

—

the number and representativeness of the organisations – not including subcontractors – involved in drawing up, implementing and disseminating the measure (five points).

| 3) | (maximum 25 points) The dissemination policy chosen will be assessed, in particular, in the light of:






  — | the messages to be put across and the target audiences (15 points), |
| --- | --- | --- |

3)

(maximum 25 points) The dissemination policy chosen will be assessed, in particular, in the light of:

—

the messages to be put across and the target audiences (15 points),

| — | the dissemintation channels used (in particular the press, radio and television, Internet, direct distribution) and their role in the measure (10 points); |
| --- | --- |

—

the dissemintation channels used (in particular the press, radio and television, Internet, direct distribution) and their role in the measure (10 points);

| 4) | (maximum 25 points) The evaluation of the measure will be appraised, in particular, in the light of:






  — | the motivation of the expected interest of the measure, and, where applicable, the assessment of the results after the execution of the measure (15 points), |
| --- | --- | --- |

4)

(maximum 25 points) The evaluation of the measure will be appraised, in particular, in the light of:

—

the motivation of the expected interest of the measure, and, where applicable, the assessment of the results after the execution of the measure (15 points),

| — | the techniques used (surveys, questionnaires, statistics, etc.) to measure the impact of the messages sent (10 points). |
| --- | --- |

—

the techniques used (surveys, questionnaires, statistics, etc.) to measure the impact of the messages sent (10 points).

---

ANNEX IV

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

COSTS

| (1) | To be eligible, costs must:






  (a) | arise directly and exclusively from the measure (preparation, implementation, follow-up and evaluation); |
| --- | --- | --- |

(1)

To be eligible, costs must:

(a)

arise directly and exclusively from the measure (preparation, implementation, follow-up and evaluation);

| (b) | be essential for the implementation of the measure and reflect the best terms available on the market; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

be essential for the implementation of the measure and reflect the best terms available on the market;

| (c) | have actually been incurred, i.e., correspond to payments supported by received invoices or documents of equivalent probative value, be recorded in the beneficiary's accounts or tax documents and be identifiable and verifiable.
  Where eligible costs are directly covered by another provider of funds, this must be specified on the revenue side of the forward budget and the final accounts under 'Other contributions'; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

have actually been incurred, i.e., correspond to payments supported by received invoices or documents of equivalent probative value, be recorded in the beneficiary's accounts or tax documents and be identifiable and verifiable.

Where eligible costs are directly covered by another provider of funds, this must be specified on the revenue side of the forward budget and the final accounts under 'Other contributions';

| (d) | arise during the period determined for the duration of the measure as specified in the grant agreement. It is understood that any expenditure incurred before the agreement is signed is at the risk of the applicant and will not be legally or financially binding on the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

arise during the period determined for the duration of the measure as specified in the grant agreement. It is understood that any expenditure incurred before the agreement is signed is at the risk of the applicant and will not be legally or financially binding on the Commission;

| (e) | be provided for in the forward budget. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

be provided for in the forward budget.

Any communication or publication by the beneficiary about the measure, including at a conference or seminar, shall indicate that the measure has received funding from the European Community. The beneficiary must ensure that this indication is clearly visible and discernible.

| (2) | The following are not eligible:






  — | contributions in kind, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(2)

The following are not eligible:

—

contributions in kind,

| — | non-specified or flat-rate expenditure, except in the particular cases referred to in this call for proposals, |
| --- | --- |

—

non-specified or flat-rate expenditure, except in the particular cases referred to in this call for proposals,

| — | indirect costs (rent, electricity, water, gas, insurance, taxes, etc.), |
| --- | --- |

—

indirect costs (rent, electricity, water, gas, insurance, taxes, etc.),

| — | invested capital costs, contingency reserves, interest on debts owed, exchange rate losses, gifts and expenditure on luxuries, |
| --- | --- |

—

invested capital costs, contingency reserves, interest on debts owed, exchange rate losses, gifts and expenditure on luxuries,

| — | costs arising from the purchase of new or second-hand equipment, |
| --- | --- |

—

costs arising from the purchase of new or second-hand equipment,

| — | deductible VAT, |
| --- | --- |

—

deductible VAT,

| — | costs not provided for in the forward budget. |
| --- | --- |

—

costs not provided for in the forward budget.

| (3) | Specific provisions relating to drawing up the final account:






  (a) | Costs must be supported by the original supporting documents (tickets, used boarding cards, invoices, salary statements, etc.) as shown in the table below and by proofs of payment.
  Where beneficiaries are required to keep originals for their own accounts, they may provide copies, provided the person who signed the grant agreement certifies on each copy that it is an exact copy of the original. Poor-quality copies will not be taken into consideration.
  All invoices must be made out in due and proper form in accordance with the legislation or rules of the country concerned and must specify the amount and percentage of VAT. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(3)

Specific provisions relating to drawing up the final account:

(a)

Costs must be supported by the original supporting documents (tickets, used boarding cards, invoices, salary statements, etc.) as shown in the table below and by proofs of payment.

Where beneficiaries are required to keep originals for their own accounts, they may provide copies, provided the person who signed the grant agreement certifies on each copy that it is an exact copy of the original. Poor-quality copies will not be taken into consideration.

All invoices must be made out in due and proper form in accordance with the legislation or rules of the country concerned and must specify the amount and percentage of VAT.

| (b) | Invoices relating to subcontracted services will only be taken into account where such subcontracting is provided for in the grant agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Invoices relating to subcontracted services will only be taken into account where such subcontracting is provided for in the grant agreement.

| Category of expenditure | Eligible | Supporting document required |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Staff costs | 1. | Employees |

Category of expenditure

Eligible

Supporting document required

Staff costs

1.

Employees

| (a) | Salary statement for the month in which the work was carried out. |
| --- | --- |

(a)

Salary statement for the month in which the work was carried out.

| (b) | Any document from an official source for the calculation of any employers' contributions not included in the salary statement. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Any document from an official source for the calculation of any employers' contributions not included in the salary statement.

| (c) | Time sheet showing the name and function of the employee, describing the task performed and the time taken. Time sheets must be signed by the employee and the person responsible for the measure and must make it possible easily to identify the tasks relating to the measure being financed. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

Time sheet showing the name and function of the employee, describing the task performed and the time taken. Time sheets must be signed by the employee and the person responsible for the measure and must make it possible easily to identify the tasks relating to the measure being financed.

| (d) | Detailed calculation of the daily rate. The different elements of this calculation shall be reconciled with documents under (a) and (b) above. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

Detailed calculation of the daily rate. The different elements of this calculation shall be reconciled with documents under (a) and (b) above.

| 2. | Self-employed persons |
| --- | --- |

2.

Self-employed persons

Invoice indicating at least the title of the measure, the nature of the work carried out and the dates when the work was carried out.

Transport costs

Train

Booking fees and the cost of second-class travel using the shortest route (1).

Ticket

Air

Booking fees and the cost of air travel for return journeys of more than 800 km, in economy class, using the lowest available promotional fare (APEX, PEX, Excursion, etc.)

Ticket, used boarding cards and travel agency invoice.

Coach and other public means of transport (2)

Intercity travel by the shortest route

Ticket or invoice indicating at least the place of departure and arrival, the number of passengers and the dates of travel.

Private or rented car (3)

For a return journey of up to 300 kilometres, an allowance of EUR 0,25 per kilometre.

A signed statement by the user giving the date, time and place of departure and return, the distance covered in kilometres, the names of passengers, the licence plate number and the reason for the journey.

Accommodation and meals

Daily allowance of a flat-rate amount to be obtained at the Internet address given in point 3.1 of this call for proposals. That amount is established per country. The fractions of the daily allowance payable are as follows:

<= 6 h: Formula

>6 h<=12 h: Formula

>12 h<=24 h: 1

>24 h<=30 h: 1Formula

>30 h<=42 h: 2, etc.

Hours are calculated from the beginning of the outward journey until the beginning of the return journey.

For a stay shorter than 12 hours, in order for this allowance to be reimbursed, a declaration of the participant must be presented. This declaration should state, besides the data relating to the action (date, location and title of the action), the role of the participant (speaker, participant, ...) and the duration of his/her stay calculated from the beginning of the outward journey until the beginning of the return journey. This declaration should be dated and signed by the participant.

For a stay beyond 12 hours, in order for this allowance to be reimbursed, the hotel bill must be presented. This bill should state the name of the person and the number of nights. If the bill relates to a group, the same information must be given.

Interpretation

| 1. | Employees |
| --- | --- |

1.

Employees

See the supporting documents required to justify costs for employed staff. The time sheet has to indicate also the languages from and into which interpretation has been provided.

| 2. | Self-employed persons: up to a maximum amount per day to be obtained at the Internet address given in the call for proposals. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Self-employed persons: up to a maximum amount per day to be obtained at the Internet address given in the call for proposals.

Invoice indicating at least the title of the measure, the languages from and into which interpretation has been provided and the dates when the work has been carried out.

Translation

| 1. | Employees: |
| --- | --- |

1.

Employees:

See the supporting documents required for staff costs. The time sheet has to indicate also the number of pages translated and languages from and into which translation has been made.

| 2. | Self-employed persons: up to a maximum amount per page to be obtained at the Internet address given in the call for proposals |
| --- | --- |

2.

Self-employed persons: up to a maximum amount per page to be obtained at the Internet address given in the call for proposals

Invoice indicating at least the title of the measure, the languages from and into which interpretation has been provided and the dates when the work has been carried out.

Consultants' and speakers fees (4)

Up to a maximum amount to be obtained at the Internet address given in the call for proposals.

Invoice indicating at least the title of the measure, the nature of the work carried out and the dates when the work was carried out.

Hire of conference halls and equipment

Invoice indicating at least the title of the measure, the nature of the equipment and the dates when the conference halls and the equipment were rented.

---

(1)  Where another class is used, expenses are eligible only on presentation of an attestation by the transport company indicating the cost of second-class travel, in which case the eligible expenditure will be limited to that amount.

(2)  Bus, underground, tram and taxi fares are not eligible.

(3)  Expenditure incurred by users on petrol, parking, road tolls and meals is not eligible. Costs of car hire are not eligible.

(4)  The fees of experts or speakers are not eligible where the persons concerned are national, Community or international civil servants or members or employees of the organisation receiving the grant or an associated or affiliated organisation.

---