alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 679 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 679

To restore and increase the deduction for the health insurance costs of 
                       self-employed individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 1993

    Mr. Holden (for himself, Mr. Kolbe, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Roberts, Mr. 
 Kanjorski, Mr. Emerson, and Mr. Olver) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To restore and increase the deduction for the health insurance costs of 
                       self-employed individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS OF SELF-EMPLOYED 
              INDIVIDUALS INCREASED AND MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 162(l) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rules for health insurance 
costs of self-employed individuals) is amended by striking ``25 
percent'' and inserting ``the applicable percentage''.
    (b) Deduction Made Permanent; Applicable Percentage.--Paragraph (6) 
of section 162(l) of such Code is amended to read as follows:
            ``(6) Applicable percentage.--For purposes of paragraph 
        (1)--

                    In the case of taxable
                                                                       
                      years beginning in
                                                         The applicable
                      calendar year:
                                                         percentage is:
                            1992, 1993, or 1994......        25 percent
                            1995 or 1996.............        50 percent
                            1997 or thereafter.......    100 percent.''
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (a) of section 110 of the Tax 
Extension Act of 1991 is amended by striking paragraph (2).
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1991.

                                 <all>
```
Table H-6-1 OTC Vertical Layer Definition for MM5 Simulations and 

Approach For Reducing CMAQ Layers By Collapsing Multiple MM5 

Layers 

MM5 CMAQ

Layer Sigma Pres(mb) Height(m) Depth(m) Layer Sigma Pres(mb) Height(m) Depth(m)

29 0.000 50 18600 2145 23 0.000 50 18600 4290 

28 0.040 88.5 16450 2145 

27 0.080 127.1 14300 1460 21 0.080 127.1 14300 2920 

26 0.123 168.5 12800 1460 

25 0.168 211.8 11400 1200 20 0.168 211.8 11400 2390 

24 0.218 260.0 10200 1200 

23 0.268 308.1 8990 934 19 0.268 308.1 8990 1870 

22 0.318 356.3 8060 934 

21 0.368 404.5 7120 772 18 0.368 404.5 7120 1540 

20 0.418 452.6 6350 772 

19 0.468 500.8 5580 662 17 0.468 500.8 5580 1320 

18 0.518 549.0 4920 662 

17 0.568 597.1 4250 581 16 0.568 597.1 4250 1160 

16 0.618 645.3 3670 581 

15 0.668 693.4 3090 532 15 0.668 693.4 3090 532 

14 0.718 741.6 2560 455 14 0.781 741.6 2560 455 

13 0.763 785.0 2110 388 13 0.763 785.0 2110 388 

12 0.803 823.5 1720 337 12 0.803 823.5 1720 337 

11 0.839 858.2 1380 290 11 0.839 858.2 1380 290 

10 0.871 889.0 1090 247 10 0.871 889.0 1090 247 

9 0.899 916.0 844 207 9 0.899 916.0 844 207 

8 0.923 939.1 637 169 8 0.923 939.1 637 169 

7 0.943 958.3 468 133 7 0.943 958.3 468 133 

6 0.959 973.7 334 107 6 0.959 973.7 334 107 

5 0.972 986.3 227 82 5 0.972 986.3 227 82 

4 0.982 995.9 145 57 4 0.982 995.9 145 57 

3 0.989 1002.6 89 40 3 0.989 1002.6 89 40 

2 0.994 1007.5 48 27 2 0.994 1007.5 48 27 

1 0.9974 1010.7 21 21 1 0.9974 1010.7 21 21 

0 1.000 1013.24 0 0 0 1.000 1013.24 0 0 

Note: Layer-top pressures assume a surface pressure of 1013.24 hPa. Layer-top heights are 

determined by averaging MM5 (CMAQ)-calculated layer-top heights over time (August 2002) 

and space (the entire 172x172 domain).
Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Kevin T. Dunphy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report for the six month period ended June 30,
2006 on Form 10-QSB of General Devices, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of and for the periods presented in this report.

4. The small business  issuer's other  certifying  officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:

         a) Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the  small  business  issuer,
including its  consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within
those  entities,  particularly  during the period in which this  report is being
prepared; and

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.

Date: August 14, 2006

/s/ Kevin T. Dunphy

Kevin T. Dunphy
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer
and Director
#### Mercury Capital Corporation, Respondent, v Shepherds Beach, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[723 NYS2d 48]

*605—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Shepherds Beach, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated March 16, 2000, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it as barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The default on the note and mortgage at issue occurred on January 1, 1992. On January 27, 1994, the defendant Eileen C. Oliver filed a petition for protection under the United States Bankruptcy Code, which imposed an automatic stay of any mortgage foreclosure actions *(see,*11 USC § 362 [a]). On May 31, 1995, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order confirming a plan under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. This action to foreclose the mortgage was not commenced until August 19, 1999.

The automatic stay was lifted when the Bankruptcy Court issued the order confirming the Chapter 11 plan *(see,*11 USC § 362 [c]; § 1141 [b]; *In re Turning Point Lounge,*111 Bankr 44; *In re Fortner Oilfield Servs.,*49 Bankr 9). Thus, the six-year Statute of Limitations of CPLR 213 (4) was tolled pursuant to CPLR 204 (a) only from January 27, 1994, to May 31, 1995. Since this foreclosure action was not commenced until August 19, 1999, it was not timely. O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Gold-stein and Smith, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906


of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Not Filed Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Friedman Industries,
Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ben Harper, Senior Vice
President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2003



| |                  
| | -----------------
| | By /s/ BEN HARPER
| |                  
| | Name: Ben Harper 

| |        |                                                      
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------
| | Title: | Senior Vice President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer
#### Dewey DUKES, Appellant, v. CHEMICALS, INC., Appellee.

No. 72-723.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 25, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 29, 1973.

Brown, Dixon & Shear, Tampa, and Podhurst, Orseck & Parks, Miami, for appellant.

Allen, Dell, Frank & Trinkle, Tampa, for appellee.

LILES, Judge.

In 1967 appellant filed a complaint against appellee for personal injuries resulting from the alleged negligence of the appellee (defendant below). From May 18, 1971 to May 31, 1972 the record reflects that no action was taken in the law suit. Appellee filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to FRCP 1.420(e), 30 F.S.A., and the cause was dismissed for failure to prosecute. In opposition to appellee’s motion to dismiss, appellant filed an affidavit setting forth that there had been activity during the period, though it was non-record activity. There had been a verbal request by appellant’s counsel for appellee’s counsel to produce certain logs and records without the necessity of a formal filing of a motion to produce.

At the hearing upon appellant’s motion to reinstate, it was brought out that appel-lee’s counsel had sought the documents without results and there appeared in the record the following:

> “Mr. Heyck: I agree with Mr. Brown that he and I discussed this, and I inquired about such documents and got no response from the client. ... I did what I told Mr. Brown I would do. I tried to get these documents. . . .”

It therefore appears that the trial judge erred in failing to reinstate the cause for the reason that there was activity, even though it was not of record, and the activity was in lieu of a motion to produce which could have been filed by the appellant. This complies with the activity discussed by this court in Whitney v. Whitney, 241 So.2d 436 (Fla.App.1970), cert. den. 245 So.2d 88 (Fla.1971), and by the Florida Supreme Court in Musselman Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. Radziwon, 263 So.2d 221 (Fla.1972), holding that non-record activity is sufficient under the “or otherwise” provision of FRCP 1.420(e). *See also,*Fleming v. Florida Power Corp., 254 So.2d 546 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1971).

Based on *Whitney*and *Musselman, supra,*the order denying reinstatement is *299hereby reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

MANN, C. J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.
<PAGE>




                                      EX-4
                                EXHIBIT 4(a)(2)

                         INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF
                                 NORTH CAROLINA

Number                                                                   Shares

                         INTER*ACT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED

              10% Series A Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock

This Certifies that ____________________________________________________is the
registered holder of _______________________________________________Shares of
the 10% Series A Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock of Inter*Act Systems,
Incorporated transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder
hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed.

In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto
affixed this ______________ day of ________________ A.D.

[Form of Reverse of Certificate]

The shares evidenced by this certificate have not been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the securities laws of any state.
The shares may not be sold, transferred, pledged or hypothecated in the absence
of an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and such registration or qualification as may be necessary under the
securities laws of any state, or an opinion of counsel satisfactory to the
corporation that such registration or qualification is not required.

The shares of common stock into which the shares represented by this certificate
are convertible, and the transfer thereof, are subject to the provisions of that
certain Shareholders' Agreement dated as of April 16, 1993, as amended and as
may be subsequently amended. Copies of the Shareholders' Agreement and
amendments thereto are on file in, and may be examined at, the principal office
of the Corporation.

THE CORPORATION WILL, UPON REQUEST, FURNISH ANY SHAREHOLDER, WITHOUT CHARGE,
INFORMATION IN WRITING AS TO THE DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES, LIMITATIONS AND
RELATIVE RIGHTS OF ALL CLASSES OF SHARES AND ANY SERIES THEREOF AND THE
AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO DETERMINE VARIATIONS FOR FUTURE SERIES.

For Value Received, ________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
_____________ Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby
irrevocable constitute and appoint ________________________ Attorney to transfer
the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation will power of
substitution in the premises.

Dated _____________________




<PAGE>
#### Yancey MORRIS, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43068.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 23, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 10, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 267 So.2d 99.

ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., dissents.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMPANY

(Section 302)

I, John T. English, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Florida Public Utilities Company (the registrant);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 14, 2007



By  /s/ John T. English

John T. English

Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF U.S. AUTOMOBILE ACCEPTANCE 1999-I 
INC., AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH DECEMBER 31, 1998
10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,864,869
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,864,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,240,971
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,153,896)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,153,896)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (6,153.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (6,153.90)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Robert Garrett Jr., Chief Executive Officer of ForwardIndustries, Inc. (”Forward”), and James O. McKenna, Chief Financial Officer ofForward, do each certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 that, to the best of theirknowledge:
    -  Forward’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2012 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
    -  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Forward.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 20th day of August 2012. 

 

| /s/ Robert Garrett Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

/s/ James O. McKenna

James O. McKenna

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Page 6 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Douglas N. Jacobson, here by certify that the attached submission was served March 18, 2015 on the following parties via electronic mail and/ or first-class mail, postage prepaid on the following:

Mr. Hershel I. Kamen Mr. Daniel A. Weiss Mr. Steve Morrissey UNITED AIRLINES, INC. hershel.kamen@united.com dan.weiss@united.com

steve.morrissey@united.com The Honorable Thomas Engle Deputy Assistant Secretary for Transportation Affairs U.S Department of State englets@state.gov

Mr. Robert Wirick Mr. Francis Heil Mr. Howard Kass AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC. Robert.wirick@aa.com Francis.heil@aa.com Howard.Kass@aa.com

Mr. Sascha Van der Bellen DELTA AIR LINES, INC. sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

DATE: March 18, 2015 _____________________________
#### Elijah JOINER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2131.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 29, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 595 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 595

 To amend title 32, United States Code, to provide that performance of 
   honor guard functions at funerals for veterans by members of the 
  National Guard may be recognized as a Federal function for National 
                            Guard purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1993

Mr. Kanjorski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 32, United States Code, to provide that performance of 
   honor guard functions at funerals for veterans by members of the 
  National Guard may be recognized as a Federal function for National 
                            Guard purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL STATUS OF SERVICE BY NATIONAL GUARD MEMBERS AS HONOR 
              GUARDS AT FUNERALS OF VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--(1) Chapter 1 of title 32, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 113. Honor guard functions at funerals for veterans
    ``Subject to such restrictions as may be prescribed by the 
Secretary concerned, the performance of honor guard functions by 
members of the National Guard at funerals for veterans of the armed 
forces may be treated by the Secretary concerned as a Federal function 
for which appropriated funds may be used. Any such performance of honor 
guard functions at funerals may not be considered to be a period of 
drill or training otherwise required.''.
    (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is 
amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``113. Honor guard functions at funerals for veterans.''.
    (b) Funding for Fiscal Year 1993.--Section 113 of title 32, United 
States Code, as added by subsection (a), does not authorize additional 
appropriations for fiscal year 1993. Any expenses of the National Guard 
by reason of such section during fiscal year 1993 may be paid from 
existing appropriations available for the National Guard.

                                 <all>
```