alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.10

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                             COVANTA CAPITAL TRUST I


     This Certificate of Trust of Covanta Capital Trust I (the "Trust"), is
being duly executed and filed by the undersigned trustee to form a business
trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. ss. 3801 et seq.) (the
"Act").

     1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Covanta Capital
Trust I.

     2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust in the State of Delaware are Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square
North, 1100 N. Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attention:
Corporate Trust Administration.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Trust
in accordance with Section 3811 of the Act.

                                       WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its
                                       individual capacity but solely as Trustee



                                       By: /s/  W. Thomas Morris, II
                                          ______________________________________
                                          Name:   W. Thomas Morris, II
                                          Title:  Administrative Account Manager
#### Linwood Leonard NICHOLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-203.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 28, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-51050

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AGUSTIN CALDERON-MORALES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-00-CR-949-ALL-DB

- - - - - - - - - -

February 15, 2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Agustin Calderon-Morales appeals his sentence following his

guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Calderon argues that his sentence

should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8

U.S.C. § 1326(a). Calderon acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224

(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court

review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 
No. 00-51050

- 2 -

Calderon’s argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres, 523

U.S. at 235. 

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted.

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
OFFICE OF 

David Moody, Ph.D., Manager aIRaNOaaownON 

Carlsbad Field Office 

Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Dr. Moodv: 

This is in response to your February 15, 2007, request for the Environmental Protection 

Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the Department of Energy's (DOE) draft recertification letter 

that amends the certifieation of the Central Characterization Project's (CCP) transuranic (FRU) 

waste characterization program at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) for remote-handled (RH) 

debris waste. The amendment is neoessary to add the real time radiography (RTR) process that 

EPA approved as a Tier 1 change on February 12, 2007 (See A-98-49; II-A4-80 in the EPA Air 

Docket). Your request is in accordance with the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) procedures that 

are intended to ensure that DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site certifications correlate 

appropriately with EPA approvals for waste characterization activities at DOE TRU waste 

generator sites. 

DOE's draft recertification of the INL CCP WC program is based on the CBFO audit, 

conducted in June 2006 (CBFO Audit A-06-21), which covered characterization activities for 

RH retrievably-stored debris waste (S5000). EPA independently conducted an RH baseline 

inspection concurrent with CBFO's audit of INL CCP's RH TRU waste characterization 

program (EPA-INI. CCP-RH-06.06-08) for compliance with EPA regulations. 

EPA concurs that the waste characterization equipment, procedures and waste streams 

encompassed in DOE's dratt recertification tetter comport with all of EPA's existing approvals 

for contact-handled and remote-handled waste at INL-CCP. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the revised draft eertification 

letter for INL CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Ed Feltcorn at (202) 

343-9422. 

Sinc 

~ t I~ 

~ 

Juan Reyes, Director 

Radiation Protection Division 

InternetAddress(UR;_)® httplfwww.epa.gov 

RecycledfRecyc€abie s Prinied with Vegetable Oil Bzsed inks on 200% Postconsumer, ?rocess Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: Electronic Distribution 

Lloyd Piper, CBFO 

Vernon Daub, CBPO 

Courtland Fesmire, CBFO 

Ava Holiand, CBFO 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO 

Martin Navarrete, CBFO 

Dennis Miehls, CBFO 

Jerry Wells, INL 

Allison Pringle, CTAC 

Wayne Ledford, CTAC 

Steve Zappe, NMED 

Nick Ceto, EPA Region X
#### FARGO MANUFACTURING CO., Inc., Appellant, v. Shirley M. CRAWFORD, Appellee.

No. 71-183.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 8, 1971.

Calvin A. Pope, Tampa, for appellant.

David A. Maney and Richard Mulhol-land, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the point on appeal and hold that under the facts of this case the learned trial judge correctly denied appellant’s motion to abate the action for lack of jurisdiction over appellant. See DeVaney v. Rumsch, Fla.1969, 228 So.2d 904 and Sayet v. Interstate Blood Bank, Inc., Fla.App.1971, 245 So.2d 142.

Affirmed.

LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
#### DADE COUNTY PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Norman SOLOMON, et al., Appellees. Norman F. SOLOMON, Appellant, v. John HUNT, et al., Appellees.

Nos. 70-587, 70-625.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 9, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1971.

Norman Solomon, and James F. Pollack, Miami, for appellants.

Richard L. Lapidus, Miami, for appel-lees.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

These appeals are from a judgment of the Circuit Court which set aside a mortgage foreclosure and cancelled the mortgage upon proof of fraud in the procurement of the mortgage and fraud in the foreclosure thereof. The judgment was entered upon a timely petition pursuant to RCP 1.540, 31 F.S.A. In addition to the relief mentioned the trial judge required the appellant, Solomon, to make restitution for some of the damages suffered by the defendants in the original action and by the purchaser at the foreclosure sale.

The finding of fraud is supported by the record and fully supports the relief granted, therefore the judgment is affirmed upon the appeal of Norman F. Solomon.

The appeal of Dade County Properties, Inc., the purchaser at the foreclosure sale, seeks reversal because of uncompensated loss of profit which it sustained. No error has been shown. See Watson v. Jones, 41 Fla. 241, 25 So. 678 (1899); Korabeck v. Childs, 98 Fla. 576, 124 So. 24 (1929).

Affirmed.
261 La. 219

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Rickey LOTT v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 52255.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 22, 1972.

In re: Rickey Lott applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus.

Application denied. On the showing made, relator is not entitled to the relief sought.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          18,733,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                   0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,011,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     12,367,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                     0
<LOANS>                                        383,586,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,884,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 444,561,000
<DEPOSITS>                                     374,116,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,966,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,643,000
<LONG-TERM>                                     27,076,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        23,698,110
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,390,189
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 444,561,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,350,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  401,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   247,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,998,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,073,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,666,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,657,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      675,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  44,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,654,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,261,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,261,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,467,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        5.65
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,480,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,157,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,600,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      441,000
<RECOVERIES>                                        50,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,884,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,884,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,063,668
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001013844
<NAME>                        Colonial Realty Limited Partnership
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1.000
<CASH>                          2,430,329
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   3,240,522
<ALLOWANCES>                    19,464
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          937,509,904
<DEPRECIATION>                  95,570,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  871,539,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         431,542,723
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        192,775,714
<OTHER-SE>                      221,318,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    871,539,089
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                96,262,545
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   51,331,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   471,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              16,614,047
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 28,787,895
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 487,503
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    28,300,392
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                   1.11





</TABLE>
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jill Wagner CONNOLLY, Appellee.

No. 70-777.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Martin County; Wallace Sample, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
##### 



Exhibit 31(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. § 7241) I, Pierre-Olivier Beckers, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:  1)
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Delhaize
America, Inc.;2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 18, 2004 /s/ Pierre-Olivier Beckers
Pierre-Olivier Beckers
Chief Executive Officer
tient Login ©) New York, NY Change

er Experience LasikPlus PRi PRK Resource

LasikPlus:5 f

Lowest Price on LASIK in Town! LASIK starting at
$250!¥

With LASIK starting at $250”, there is no better time to have
LASIK at LasikP/us! Schedule your FREE LASIK consultation 7 Star ty j
today. At LasikPlus, you can receive:

> 100% Bladeless LASIK procedure SZ 0}
od y a0

‘A 100% Bladeless LASIK procedure offers you a virtually painless

procedure with immediate results, meaning you can get back to Schedule Now
work the next day.” Limited Time Offer!

> LASIK from a LASIK expert

Our surgeons are among the nation’s most experienced having

performed over 1.8 Million procedures.

> Guaranteed Financing options*

From $0 down to 0% interest, to plans with monthly payments of
$100 or less*

Find Out if LASIK is
Right for You

Take this short quiz and find out if a LasikPlus

procedure is the right solution for you.

H 7 Explore Corporate Offices Follow Legal & Privat z
LasikPlusz5 . a 9 cy Next: Locations Near Me



We pro Find a Vision Center 3rd Floor

effective, and affordable Experience Cincinnati
ASIK & PRK, Cost of LASIK

SI Contact Us
Give yourself the gift of LASIK Procedure

unaided vision today. PRK Procedure

itional Disclaimers

12:24:59 PM 8/13/2019 https://www.lasikplus.com/affordable-lasik-250-discount/
Exhibit 23.1a

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following Registration Statements of our reports dated March 8, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of The PMI Group, Inc., The PMI Group, Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of The PMI Group, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference in the following Registration Statements of our report dated March 8, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of PMI Mortgage Insurance Ltd included as Exhibit 99.1 in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2005.



|                              |  |        
|----------------------------- |  | -------
|Registration Statement Number |  | On Form
|333-123049                    |  | S-8    
|333-32190                     |  | S-8    
|333-47473                     |  | S-8    
|333-63122                     |  | S-8    
|333-66829                     |  | S-8    
|333-76742                     |  | S-8    
|333-81679                     |  | S-8    
|333-15543                     |  | S-3    
|033-99378                     |  | S-8    
|333-48035                     |  | S-3    
|333-67125                     |  | S-3    
|333-70306                     |  | S-3    
|333-29777                     |  | S-4    
|333-102761                    |  | S-8    
|333-107747                    |  | S-3    
|333-110044                    |  | S-3    
|333-130103                    |  | S-8    
|333-130102                    |  | S-8    
|033-92636                     |  | S-8    

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Los Angeles, California

March 10, 2006



---

Exhibit 23.1b

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption Experts and to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-127026) and the related Prospectus of the Medallion Trust Series 2006-1G of our reports dated March 8, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedules of The PMI Group, Inc., The PMI Group, Inc.s managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of The PMI Group,
Inc., included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005 and of our report dated March 8, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of PMI Mortgage Insurance Ltd included as Exhibit 99.1 in The
PMI Group, Inc.s Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Ernst & Young
LLP

Los Angeles, California

March 10, 2006
|  | **Exhibit 5**

 

 

 

  |
|--|-----------------------------------------------|

August 25, 2006

 

Aduddell Industries, Inc.

1601 N.W. Expressway

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73118

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We have acted as counsel to Aduddell Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) in connection with the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (together with any subsequent amendments thereto, the “Registration Statement”) relating to the issuance by the Company of up to 886,266 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001, upon the exercise of certain options and warrants, as described in the Registration Statement.

We have examined the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and have made such other investigations of fact and law as we deem necessary to render the opinions set forth herein.  Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued upon exercise of the options and warrants described in the Registration Statement have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action and, when issued upon exercise of the options and warrants and payment of the consideration required therefor, will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

We hereby consent to the inclusion of this opinion letter as an exhibit to the Registration Statement.  We also consent to the reference to our firm in the Registration Statement.

Very truly yours,

 

/s/  McAfee & Taft A Professional Corporation
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 750

To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979 and to authorize

appropriations under that Act for fiscal years 1993 and 1994.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1993

Mr. GEJDENSON (for himself and Mr. ROTH) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL

To extend the Export Administration Act of 1979 and to

authorize appropriations under that Act for fiscal years

1993 and 1994.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

4 Section 18 of the Export Administration Act of 1979

5 (50 U.S.C. App. 2417) is amended by striking subsection

6 (b) and inserting the following:

7 ‘‘(b) AUTHORIZATION.—There are authorized to be

8 appropriated to the Department of Commerce to carry out

9 the purposes of this Act—

10 ‘‘(1) $42,813,000 for the fiscal year 1993;
2

•HR 750 IH

1 ‘‘(2) such sums as may be necessary for the fis2 cal year 1994; and

3 ‘‘(3) such additional amounts, for each such fis4 cal year, as may be necessary for increases in salary,

5 pay, retirement, other employee benefits authorized

6 by law, and other nondiscretionary costs.’’.

7 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE ACT.

8 Section 20 of the Export Administration Act of 1979

9 (50 U.S.C. App. 2419) is amended by striking ‘‘September

10 30, 1990’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 1994’’.

Æ