alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BRADLEY INVESTMENT, INC., O’Riley Investment, Inc., Liberal Investment, Inc., Hugo Investment, Inc., and the Third Investment, Inc., Appellants, v. VIMY INVESTMENT, INC., and Sam Biberman, Trustee, Appellees.

No. 77-2525.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 14, 1978.

R. T. Shankweiler of Patterson, Maloney & Shankweiler, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

*905Maurice M. Garcia of Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider & Mager, P. A., Hollywood, for appellee, Vimy Investment, Inc.

LETTS, Judge.

This appeal involves the reinstatement of a case dismissed for lack of prosecution. The same order of reinstatement also vacated an earlier order abating the cause entered because litigation on the same subject matter had earlier commenced, and was still pending, in Canada. We reverse that part of the judge’s order vacating the abatement.

From the record and facts provided, we cannot say that the trial judge abused his discretion when, for good cause shown, he reinstated this case dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to Fla.R. of Civ.P. 1.420(e). However, we think he was in error in not continuing the abatement. The trial judge himself recognized the continuation of the Canadian proceedings noting in his order:

> Those court orders abated this cause because of the pendency of certain Canadian litigation which the Court has been advised by counsel for the Plaintiff and the intervenors, STILL CONTINUES (emphasis supplied).

However the pendency of the Canadian litigation was the very reason for the entry of an abatement order in the first place and if it (the litigation) STILL CONTINUES, we find nothing in the record to warrant a vacation of the abatement. Moreover, part of the Court’s reasoning for reinstatement of the case was that the non-record activity was justified by the Canadian litigation. Accordingly, we find it inconsistent to, in part, find the foreign litigation good cause to reinstate, but not good cause to continue the abatement in accordance with the precepts of *Cicero v. Paradis,*184 So.2d 212 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966).

We would comment that the trial court continues to have the authority to reconsider any order of abatement, upon a proper showing of a change in circumstances.

REVERSED IN PART IN ACCORDANCE HEREWITH.

CROSS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31(b)**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. § 7241) 

 

I, Carol M. Herndon, Chief Accounting Officer, certify that: 

 

1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Delhaize America, Inc.; 

 

2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 17, 2005
#### TERMINAL TRANSPORT CO., Inc., Petitioner, v. LAMTRON INDUSTRIES, INC., Respondent.

No. 39768.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 13, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 233 So.2d 854.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### Roy J. Matosin, Plaintiff, *v.*City of New York et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

October 9, 1952.

*974
      *Denis M. Hurley, Corporation Counsel (Stanley Buehsbaum*and *Morris L. Heath*of counsel), for defendants.

*MoÁloon S Hirschberg*for plaintiff.

Edeb, J.

Motion of defendants for judgment on the pleadings is granted.

The action is for a declaratory judgment that New York City Local Law No. 58 for 1952 (Administrative Code of City of New York, ch. 46, tit. F) is unconstitutional, invalid and void. In brief, this enactment is a city tax on the privilege of selling liquor, wine or beer at retail for on- or off-premises consumption and imposes an annual tax in an amount equal to 25% of the license fees payable under the State Alcoholic Beverage Control Law.

Plaintiff is the owner of a restaurant and bar in this city; he possesses a liquor license permitting the sale at retail of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption of liquor, Avine and beer; the license fee is $1,200 which was paid; this license expires on February 28,1953.

Plaintiff, in brief, assails the said city tax law as being generally and constitutionally invalid, as being unfair, discriminatory; that it denies to plaintiff and others similarly situated the equal protection and due process of the laws in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the National Constitution ; that it is also violative of section 22 of article III of the State Constitution in failing to state distinctly the object of the tax; that it is violative of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law; is unreasonable; is multiple taxation.

Aside from the few factual features mentioned *(supra)*the averments of the complaint are descriptive of the law; the organization of the city government; the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law; and embody various legal conclusions.

The constitutionality and general validity of this statute has been challenged in four prior actions upon applications for injunctions *pendente*lite; in each instance the validity of this enactment has been sustained *(Steuben Restaurants*v. *City of New York,*202 Misc. 22; *Linehan-Leary Corp.*v. *City of New York,*202 Misc. 25; *O’Gara*v. *Joseph,*202 Misc. 28; *Tonkelson*v. *City of New York,*202 Misc. 892.)

*975The divers contentions advanced by plaintiff have been discussed at length in the cited cases and held to be untenable; no reason manifests itself why a converse view should be taken here under the allegations of the complaint. The court is in accord with the views expressed and the conclusions set forth in the opinions in the cited cases and it will serve no useful purpose to again enter upon a detailed discussion in upholding the validity of the said local law; to do so would be merely to indulge in a repetitious disquisition, quite unnecessary.

Judgment is rendered dismissing the complaint and declaration is made that said Local Law No. 58 for 1952 is a valid and constitutional enactment.

Settle order and judgment on notice.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 29116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13473]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 19, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Mark A. Rauzi, Vice 
President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. Greta Christianson, Bloomington, Minnesota and Ingrid Langseth, 
Worthington, Minnesota, individually, and as members of the 
Christianson/Langseth family shareholder group; to retain voting shares 
of FSB Holding Company, Inc., Trimont, Minnesota (FSB), and thereby 
indirectly retain shares of Farmers State Bank of Trimont, Trimont, 
Minnesota (Trimont Bank).
    Additionally, Beverly Anthony, Trimont, Minnesota, as a member of 
the Anthony family shareholder control group; to retain shares of FSB, 
and thereby indirectly retain shares of Trimont Bank.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 19, 2018.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-13473 Filed 6-21-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003, (the Report) of First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc., the (Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  | 
|-------------------- |  | 
|Date: August 5, 2003 |  | 
|                     |  | 
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 5, 2003 |  |
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Forest Laboratories,Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard Solomon, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

            1.          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.

 

/s/ Howard Solomon       Howard SolomonChairman of the Board,Chief Executive Officerand DirectorFebruary 11, 2008
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8162 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

AN ACT 

To express the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Education should provide certain waivers to community 

learning centers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 8162 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘21st Century Commu3 nity Learning Centers Coronavirus Relief Act of 2020’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING FLEXIBLE USE 

5 OF SUBGRANT FUNDS. 

6 It is the sense of Congress that for school year 2020– 

7 2021, notwithstanding each provision in part B of title 

8 IV of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

9 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7171 et seq.) that requires activities 

10 under such part be carried out during nonschool hours or 

11 periods when school is not in session, the Secretary of 

12 Education should carry out the exceptions included in the 

13 notice entitled ‘‘Agency Information Collection Activities; 

14 Comment Request; 21st CCLC 4201(b)(1) Waiver Re15 quest’’, published by the Department of Education in the 

16 Federal Register on September 3, 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 

17 55002), by providing that each eligible entity that is 

18 awarded a subgrant under section 4204 of such Act (20 

19 U.S.C. 7174) for community learning centers may use 

20 such subgrant funds— 

21 (1) to carry out activities described in section 

22 4205 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 7175), regardless of 

23 whether such activities are conducted in-person or 

24 virtually, or during school hours or when school is 

25 in session; and 

26 (2) to provide in-person care during— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 8162 RFS

1 (A) the regular school day for students eli2 gible to receive services under part B of title IV 

3 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 7171 et seq.); and 

4 (B) a period in which full-time in-person 

5 instruction is not available for all such students 

6 served by such eligible entity. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 16, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4.9


             INSTRUMENTS DEFINING THE RIGHTS OF
           SECURITY HOLDERS, INCLUDING INDENTURES


The  Registrant  has various long-term debt agreements  which
define  the  rights  of  the  holders  of  the  related  debt
securities  of  the  Registrant.  The  Registrant  agrees  to
furnish  copies  of  any  unfiled  debt  agreements  to   the
Commission upon request.


                                        FLEMING COMPANIES, INC.
                                        (Registrant)

                                           NEAL RIDER

Date:    March 23, 2000                By  Neal Rider
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Financial and
                                           Accounting Officer)
Exhibit
          32.1
 **Certification
          of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**
 **pursuant
          to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**
 **Section
          906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 
 
 
 
 Securities
          and Exchange Commission
 Washington,
          DC
 
 The
          undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Shells
          Seafood Restaurants, Inc. do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
          1350,
          as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
          the
          Annual Report of Shells Seafood Restaurants, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the
          fiscal
          year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
          contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all
          material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Shells Seafood
          Restaurants, Inc.
 
 A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
          to
          Shells Seafood Restaurants, Inc. and will be retained by Shells Seafood
          Restaurants, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
          or its
          staff upon request.
 
 
 
 
 /s/
          Leslie J. Christon
 President
          and Chief Executive Officer
 April
          30, 2007
 
 
 
 
 /s/
          Warren R. Nelson
 Executive
          Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 April
          30, 2007
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)September 23, 2014(Date of earliest event reported)September 22, 2014





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---




Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn September 22, 2014, we announced plans to invest $480 million to $680 million to construct new natural gas processing facilities and related infrastructure in North Dakota and Wyoming.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)ExhibitsExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated September 22, 2014.





2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:September 23, 2014By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer


3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated September 22, 2014.








4
261 La. 226

#### Calvin MANUEL, Sr. v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52278.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 22, 1972.

In re: Calvin Manuel, Sr. applying for remedial writs and writ of habeas corpus.

Application not considered. Not verified by affidavit as required by law. La. C.Cr.P. Art. 353.
#### Sammie Earl WALKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-533.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 19, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         122,442
<SECURITIES>                                   133,572
<RECEIVABLES>                                  882,386
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,233
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,219,958
<PP&E>                                         309,421
<DEPRECIATION>                                 182,153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,854,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,379,346            
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       265,160
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,854,604
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               303,446
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  291,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,744)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   631
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,363
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,373
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,173
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,173
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>