alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Friendly Ice Cream Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended July 3, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John L. Cutter, as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Paul V. Hoagland, as Executive Vice President of Administration and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | By:                |   /s/ JOHN L. CUTTER                       |   |
|--------|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:              | John L. Cutter                                       |
|   | Title:             | Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal     |
|   | Executive Officer) |
|   | Date:              | August 4, 2005                                  |
|   |               |                                                 |
|   |               |                                                 |
|   | By:                |   /s/ PAUL  V. HOAGLAND                    |   |
|   | Name:              | Paul V. Hoagland                                     |
|   | Title:             | Executive Vice President of Administration and Chief |
|   |               | Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)      |
|   | Date:              | August 4, 2005                                  |
|        |                    |                                                      |        |  |  |

 

----
IIA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 734

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 3 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

AN ACT

To amend the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the extension of certain Federal benefits, services, and assistance

to the Pascua Yaqui Indians of Arizona, and for other

purposes.’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 734 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SOVEREIGNTY OF PASCUA YAQUI TRIBE.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of the first section

3 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the extension

4 of certain Federal benefits, services, and assistance to the

5 Pascua Yaqui Indians of Arizona, and for other purposes’’

6 (25 U.S.C. 1300f(a)) is amended by inserting after the

7 first sentence the following: ‘‘The Pascua Yaqui Tribe, a

8 historic Indian tribe, is acknowledged as a federally recog9 nized Indian tribe possessing all the attributes of inherent

10 sovereignty which have not been specifically taken away

11 by Acts of Congress and which are not inconsistent with

12 such tribal status.’’.

13 (b) EXTENSION OF ENROLLMENT DEADLINE.—Sec14 tion 3 of such Act (25 U.S.C. 1300f–2) is amended—

15 (1) in paragraph (B) by striking ‘‘and’’; and

16 (2) by redesignating paragraph (C) as para17 graph (D) and inserting after paragraph (B) the fol18 lowing new paragraph (C):

19 ‘‘(C) all those persons of Yaqui blood who are

20 citizens of the United States and who, within three

21 years after the date of enactment of this paragraph,

22 apply for enrollment in the Pascua Yaqui Tribe pur23 suant to the membership criteria and procedures
3

•HR 734 RFS

1 provided for in the official governing documents of

2 the Pascua Yaqui Tribe; and’’.

Passed the House of Representatives August 2,

1993.

Attest: DONNALD K. ANDERSON,

Clerk.
#### Leonard R. BOURQUE v. OLIN CORPORATION et al.

No. 60165.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1977.

In re: Leonard R. Bourque applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 346 So.2d 1373.

Denied. On the facts found by the court of appeal, its judgment is correct.
#### THOM McAN SHOE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Betty J. LOUCKS and Gordon Loucks, her husband, Appellees.

No. 70-638.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 3, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000037848
<NAME> WASATCH PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,140
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,243
<PP&E>                                          39,749
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,123,756
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,463
<COMMON>                                       344,873
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,429,188)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,903
<SALES>                                         65,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,386
<CGS>                                            5,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  374,346
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,276
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (348,917)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (348,917)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
257 La. 165

#### Sheila NEWMAN v. Tanas NEWMAN, Jr.

No. 51028.

Supremo Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1970.

In re: Sheila Newman applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ refused. The rulings of the trial court and of the court of appeal are correct.

SUMMERS, Justice,

is of the opinion the writ should not be filed in forma pau-peris for it involves a suit for separation from bed and board, La.Code Civ.P. Art. 5181. I concur, however, with the majority that the ruling of the trial court is correct.

BARHAM, Justice,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. The issue of discriminatory imposition of costs without benefit of the poor to proceed in forma pauperis is before the United States Supreme Court under the United States Constitution in two cases. I am of the opinion that our C.C.P. Article 5181 poses a serious constitutional question under our own constitution. We should review the matter especially in view of the mandates of La.Const. Article 1, Sec. 2 and Article 1, Sec. 6.
#### Glenda H. ROBERTS, etc. v. CENTRAL DELTA WAREHOUSING CORP. et al.

No. 50338.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 24, 1978.

McTeer, Walls, Bailey & Buck, Charles Victor McTeer, Greenville, for appellant.

Levingston, Jacks, Levingston & Land, Alfred A. Levingston, Cleveland, for appel-lees.

Before SMITH, P. J., and SUGG and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Daniel Roger PUGH v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 61351.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

' In re: Daniel Roger Pugh applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus. East Baton Rouge Parish.

Denied.
Memorandum

Date:

To: Balaji Vaidyanathan, Permit Section Manager

From: Eric Massey, Air Quality Division Director

Subject: Proposed Final Permits to be Treated as Appealable Agency Actions

The 2012 amendments to our permit rules, which were adopted in order to meet federal new 

source review requirements, provide that an applicant for a Class I permit or Class I permit 

revision may begin actual construction, but not operation, on receipt of a “proposed final 

permit.” R18-2-302(G); R18-2-334(B), R18-2-402(C). A proposed final permit is “the version of 

a Class I permit or Class I permit revision that the Department proposes to issue and forwards to 

the Administrator for review,” as required by § 502 of Title V of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 

7661d.

In effect, under the revised rules, a proposed final permit is treated as a final authorization to 

construct. The purpose of this treatment is to ensure that Arizona’s unitary permit program does 

not place restrictions on Arizona industries that they would not face in jurisdictions with binary

programs. Under a binary program, separate permits are issued to construct and operate, and only 

permits to operate are subject to EPA review under Title V. Thus a source in a jurisdiction with a 

binary program ordinarily would have the authority to proceed with construction under a 

construction permit before EPA review of the Title V permit or permit revision occurred.

Under Arizona administrative law, an “appealable agency action” is defined as “an action that 

determines the legal rights, duties or privileges of a party.” Because a proposed final permit or 

permit revision under the revised rules determines the applicant’s right to construct, it must be 

treated as an appealable agency action separate from the issuance of the final permit or permit 

revision.

1 We must therefore issue a notice of appealable agency action for both the proposed 

final permit or permit revision, as well as the final permit or permit revision.

Please distribute this memorandum to all of your permit engineers so that they are aware of this 

obligation. In addition, make sure that the subject matter of this memorandum is covered in any 

training for permit engineers hired in the future.

 

1 Duplicative appeals can be avoided by consolidating appeals of proposed final permit and final permits, should 

they occur.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 588

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

20 South Main in Beaver, Utah, as the ‘‘Abe Murdock United States

Post Office Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. HANSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 20 South Main in Beaver, Utah, as the ‘‘Abe

Murdock United States Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 20 South Main in Beaver, Utah, is designated

6 as the ‘‘Abe Murdock United States Post Office

7 Building’’.
2

•HR 588 IH

1 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in any law, regulation, document,

3 record, map, or other paper of the United States to the

4 facility referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference

5 to the ‘‘Abe Murdock United States Post Office Building’’.

Æ
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8137 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to ensure accurate and timely 

reporting of smoking variants through updating the Federal Health IT 

Strategic Plan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 28, 2020 

Mr. TRONE (for himself and Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to ensure accurate 

and timely reporting of smoking variants through updating the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accurate Reporting 

5 of Smoking Variants Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress makes the following findings: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8137 IH

1 (1) The Centers for Disease Control and Pre2 vention has reported 2,807 lung injuries and 68 con3 firmed deaths from vaping-related injuries. 

4 (2) According to the 2019 National Youth To5 bacco Survey, over 5 million kids were reported to 

6 be currently using electronic nicotine delivery sys7 tems (ENDS), or e-cigarettes. 

8 (3) Repeated prolonged exposure to aerosols 

9 founds in e-cigarettes and vaping devices pose con10 siderable potential risk, the long-term health con11 sequences of which also remain to be determined. 

12 SEC. 3. ENSURING ACCURATE AND TIMELY REPORTING OF 

13 SMOKING VARIANTS. 

14 (a) UPDATING THE FEDERAL HEALTH IT STRA15 TEGIC PLAN.—Section 3001(c)(3)(A) of the Public Health 

16 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300jj–11(c)(3)(A)) is amended by 

17 adding at the end the following new clause: 

18 ‘‘(ix) Strategies to enable, through the 

19 use of electronic health records, the accu20 rate and timely collection and use of infor21 mation on the use of electronic nicotine de22 livery systems, vaping, water pipes, and 

23 other variations of smoking in the same 

24 manner as, through such records, informa25 tion on smoking is collected and used.’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8137 IH

1 (b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 

3 Health and Human Services shall issue such regulations 

4 as are necessary to carry out the amendment made by sub5 section (a). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                         Washington, D.C. 20549


                              FORM 8-K


                            CURRENT REPORT


                    Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                    The Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                             June 23, 1997
                             Date of Report
                    (Date of earliest event reported)


                         FLEMING COMPANIES, INC.
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


            Oklahoma                 1-8140                 48-0222760
      (State or other juris-        (Commission             (IRS Employer
      diction of incorporation)      File Number)           Identification)


                    6301 Waterford Boulevard, Box 26647
                      Oklahoma City, Oklahoma   73126
                   (Address of Principal Executive Offices)


                              (405) 840-7200
                         Registrant's telephone number,
                            including area code
<PAGE>
Item 5.      Other Events.

          On  February  28,  1997,  Furr's Supermarkets of Albuquerque, New
Mexico ("Furr's"), filed suit against  Fleming.  Furr's  was  the company's 
largest customer  in 1996 and  Fleming  owns  a  35% equity interest in the 
grocery chain.  The lawsuit claims that Fleming  intentionally  overcharged
Furr's  for  products  and alleges  various  causes  of  action.   Prior to 
filing the lawsuit, Furr's was  seeking  to  exercise  the  competitiveness
clause  of  its  10-year supply  contract  with  Fleming,  which expires in 
2001.  Fleming  has reviewed  and  rejected  Furr's  purported  competitive
bid  as  not  qualifying  under  the supply contract.   Disputes  involving
the  competitiveness  clause  are currently  subject to  arbitration.   See
the company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q  for  the  16-week period ended 
April 19, 1997.

          On  June  23,  1997, Furr's  took steps to seek court approval to
amend its complaint against Fleming.  The  amended  complaint  will contain
allegations of federal RICO violations and other claims  seeking damages in
excess of $75 million.

          Fleming   believes   it   has  substantially  complied  with  its
obligations to Furr's in good faith,  and Fleming continues to serve Furr's
stores.  Although Fleming believes Furr's allegations are without merit and
will  vigorously  defend  its  interests, an  unfavorable  outcome  in  the
litigation, or the loss of Furr's  business  for  any  reason, could have a
material adverse effect on Fleming.

<PAGE>

                         SIGNATURES

     Pursuant  to the  requirements of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                              FLEMING COMPANIES, INC.

                                            
                                      KEVIN J. TWOMEY
                              By:     Kevin J. Twomey
                                      Vice President - Controller


Date: June 24, 1997
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Forest Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard
Solomon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Howard
Solomon


Howard
Solomon


Chief
Executive Officer


February
6, 2009
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gerald F. NEFF.

No. 54546.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 5, 1974.

In re: Gerald F. Neff applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied. Applicant has an adequate remedy by appeal, in event of conviction.
# Official Journal C 432/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 432 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6426 October 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 432

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6426 October 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 432/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10443 – ALLIANZ CAPITAL/AIMCO/DALMORE/GENERATION/PORTERBROOK) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 432/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10443 – ALLIANZ CAPITAL/AIMCO/DALMORE/GENERATION/PORTERBROOK) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 432/02 | Euro exchange rates — 25 October 2021 | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 432/02

Euro exchange rates — 25 October 2021

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 432/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10501 – Bouygues/Destia) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2021/C 432/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10382 – CDPE/Macquarie/Blackstone/ASPI) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| 2021/C 432/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10319 – Greiner/Recticel) (
  1
  ) | 7 |
| 2021/C 432/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10510 – Apollo Management/K1 Group) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 8 |
| 2021/C 432/07 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10320 – Aperam/ELG Haniel) (
  1
  ) | 9 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 432/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10501 – Bouygues/Destia) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

2021/C 432/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10382 – CDPE/Macquarie/Blackstone/ASPI) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

5

2021/C 432/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10319 – Greiner/Recticel) (
  1
  )

1

7

2021/C 432/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10510 – Apollo Management/K1 Group) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

8

2021/C 432/07

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10320 – Aperam/ELG Haniel) (
  1
  )

1

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Peter ARIS, Petitioner, v. BIG TEN TAXI CORPORATION, Employers Service Corporation, et al., Respondents.

No. 39829.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 29, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### Albert Vall TRAWICK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-639.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 6, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23





Independent Auditors Consent



The Board of Directors
Downey Financial Corp.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-30483) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-50416 and No. 333-79835) on Form S-3
of Downey Financial Corp. of our report dated January 16, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Downey Financial
Corp. and subsidiares as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders
equity and cash flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December
31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of Downey Financial Corp.



/s/  KPMG  LLP



Los Angeles, CaliforniaMarch 5, 2004

| |  | Navigation Links
| |  | ----------------
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8070 

To include the cost of print production of local print media in the paycheck 

protection program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 18, 2020 

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota (for himself and Mr. PETERSON) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To include the cost of print production of local print media 

in the paycheck protection program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserving Readership 

5 and Information of Newspapers for Tomorrow Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘PRINT Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8070 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF COST OF PRINT PRODUCTION OF 

2 LOCAL PRINT MEDIA IN THE PAYCHECK PRO3 TECTION PROGRAM. 

4 Section 7(a)(36)(F)(i) of the Small Business Act (15 

5 U.S.C. 636(a)(36)(F)(i)) is amended— 

6 (1) in subclause (VI), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

7 end; 

8 (2) in subclause (VII), by striking the period at 

9 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub11 clause: 

12 ‘‘(VIII) the cost of print produc13 tion of local print media for an eligi14 ble recipient assigned a North Amer15 ican Industry Classification System 

16 code beginning with 511110.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS