alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12


                       LIBERTY FINANCIAL COMPANIES, INC.

                       STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

                                ($ in millions)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        Year Ended December 31
                                                                ---------------------------------------
                                                                    1997          1996          1995
                                                                -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                                                             <C>           <C>           <C>
 Earnings:
  Income before income taxes ................................    $ 192.1       $ 150.3       $ 113.8
  Add fixed charges:
   Interest on indebtedness .................................       21.4          19.7          16.2
   Portion of rent representing the interest factor .........        3.7           4.0           3.7
   Preferred stock dividends ................................        0.9           0.9           0.7
   Accretion to face value of redeemable convertible
     preferred stock ........................................        0.8           0.9           0.6
                                                                 -------       -------       -------
  Income as adjusted ........................................    $ 218.9       $ 175.8       $ 135.0
                                                                 =======       =======       =======
 Fixed charges:
  Interest on indebtedness ..................................    $  21.4       $  19.7       $  16.2
  Portion of rent representing the interest factor ..........        3.7           4.0           3.7
  Preferred stock dividends .................................        0.9           0.9           0.7
  Accretion to face value of redeemable convertible
    preferred stock .........................................        0.8           0.9           0.6
                                                                 -------       -------       -------
  Total fixed charges .......................................    $  26.8       $  25.5       $  21.2
                                                                 =======       =======       =======
 Ratio of earnings to fixed charges .........................       8.17x         6.89x         6.39x
                                                                 =======       =======       =======
</TABLE>
<PAGE>


       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. (S)1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2002, (the "Report") of First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc., the
("Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Charles K. Graham, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                  /s/ Charles K. Graham
               ---------------------------------------------------------------
                  Charles K. Graham
                  President and Chief Executive Officer/Director
                  (Principal Executive Officer)


                  /s/ Francie P. Reppy
               ---------------------------------------------------------------
                  Francie P. Reppy
                  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                  (Chief Financial Officer)

August 9, 2002
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Coastal Financial Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-49741, 333-01274 and 333-54794) on Form S-8 of Coastal Financial Corporation
of our report dated October 29, 2003, relating to the consolidated statements of
financial condition of Coastal Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of
September 30, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2003, which
report is incorporated by reference in the September 30, 2003 Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Coastal Financial Corporation.

                                                        KPMG LLP

Greenville, South Carolina
December 19, 2003


                                       69
#### Ernest Thompson LEWIS, Jr., and Edenfield Sales Company, Inc., Appellants, v. Leo WILSON, Appellee.

No. 2598.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 7, 1969.

John W. Bussey of Akerman, Senterfitt, Eidson, Mesmer, Robbinson & Wharton, Orlando, for appellants.

Walter C. Shepard of Shepard, Shepard & Minot, Cocoa, for appellee.

*692PER CURIAM.

Defendants appeal from a final judgment entered against them upon a jury verdict favoring plaintiff in a personal injury action arising out of a motor vehicle-pedestrian collision.

Our review of the pleadings, transcript and entire record on appeal negates argument that the issues of negligence and contributory negligence were not matters for disposition by the jury. Stegemann v. Hite, Fla.App. 1957, 96 So.2d 595; Noll v. Byorick, Fla.App.1959, 108 So.2d 67; Shiffman v. Crowe, Fla.App.1964, 159 So. 2d 664.

No reversible error being demonstrated, this cause is affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN, and REED, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                             U.S. TRUST CORPORATION

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             State or Other Jurisdiction Office       Percent
                                                                                   of Incorporation                    Owned
                                                                            ------------------------------------    ------------
<S>                                                                                       <C>                           <C>
United States Trust Company of New York                                                   New York                      100.0%
   United States Trust Company International Corporation                                  United States                 100.0
      United States Trust Company of New York (Grand Cayman) Ltd.                         Cayman Islands                100.0
      UST Overseas Corporation                                                            Delaware                      100.0
        Foreign & Colonial Asset Management                                               London, England                50.0
   UST Property Company, Inc.                                                             New York                      100.0
   UST Financial Services Corp.                                                           New York                      100.0
U.S. Trust Company of California, N.A.                                                    California                    100.0
   UST Fiduciary Services Ltd.                                                            Delaware                      100.0
U.S. Trust Company of Connecticut                                                         Connecticut                   100.0
U.S. Trust Company of Florida Savings Bank                                                Florida                       100.0
U.S. Trust Company of New Jersey                                                          New Jersey                    100.0
   UST Securities Corporation                                                             New Jersey                    100.0
U.S.T. L.P.O. Corp.                                                                       Delaware                      100.0
   U.S. Trust Company of Texas, N.A.                                                      Texas                         100.0
CTMC Holding Company                                                                      Oregon                        100.0
   CTC Consulting, Inc.                                                                   Oregon                        100.0
   U.S. Trust Company of the Pacific Northwest                                            Oregon                        100.0
</TABLE>
#### Dr. Francis J. CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. Henry H. RUTKIN, Appellee.

No. 70-666.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 26, 1971.

*436William T. Kruglak, II, Miami, for appellant.

Stephen Lubow, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from an adverse final judgment for the plaintiff below, Henry H. Rutkin.

Appellant argues that the trial court erred in not granting his motion to dismiss because plaintiff failed to join the Associated Doctors Hospital, Inc., as an indispensable party to this action.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal in light of this contention and find it to be without merit.

Appellant’s second point for reversal is based on the failure of an alleged condition precedent in a contract. The alleged contract was in writing but was not signed by either party. There is a receipt dated August 7, 1967 executed by Francis J. Campbell, M.D., in the record. This is the only sufficient evidence of any written agreement between these parties.

We hold there was insufficient proof of a breach of a condition precedent in any contract between these parties. See Premium Groves, Inc. v. Grand Island Citrus Co-op., Inc., Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 551.

The final judgment is, therefore,

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 720 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 720

   To authorize the adjustment of the boundaries of the South Dakota 
portion of the Sioux Ranger District of Custer National Forest, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1993

 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the adjustment of the boundaries of the South Dakota 
portion of the Sioux Ranger District of Custer National Forest, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SIOUX RANGER DISTRICT BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) In General.--In accordance with the Act entitled ``An Act to 
consolidate national forest lands'', approved March 20, 1922 (16 U.S.C. 
485 et seq.), and in exchange for national forest lands in Custer 
National Forest, the Secretary of Agriculture may accept title to any 
lands located within five miles of the exterior boundaries of the South 
Dakota portion of the Sioux Ranger District of Custer National Forest 
that are not owned by the United States and that are found by the 
Secretary of Agriculture to be chiefly valuable for national forest 
purposes.
    (b) Incorporation into Custer National Forest.--Upon acceptance of 
title by the Secretary of Agriculture, lands conveyed to the United 
States in accordance with subsection (a) shall become part of the 
Custer National Forest.

                                 <all>
```
261 La. 1048

#### Willard J. MATTE v. POWER RIG DRILLING COMPANY, Inc., et al.

No. 52446.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 1972.

In re: Power Rig Drilling Co., Inc. and Argonaut Southwest Insurance Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Acadia. 260 So.2d 19.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG, LLP INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 File Nos. 33-90378, 33-91560, 333-29191, 333-4148 and 333-56931)
pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 1995 Stock Option/Stock
Issuance Plan and 1995 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan of Remedy
Corporation of our report dated January 21, 1999 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Remedy Corporation included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.
 
                                          /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Palo Alto, California
March 10, 1999
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Kevin
      T. Dunphy, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Aduromed Industries, Inc.,
      (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the three month period ended
      September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
      or
      15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      November 14, 2008





/s/
                Kevin T. DunphyKevin
                T. DunphyTreasurer
                and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,As adopted pursuant toSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Binding Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2005, (the "Report"), I, Dennis J.Martin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
#### C. C. MONK v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SCOTT COUNTY, Miss.

No. 45859.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 1, 1970.

William C. Thompson, Forest, for appellant.

Roy N. Lee, W. A. Huff, Forest, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA PANTALEON-FLORES,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71174

Agency No. A095-638-340

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 20, 2011** 

Before: RYMER, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Maria Pantaleon-Flores, a native and citizen, petitions pro se for review of

the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying, as untimely, PantaleonFlores’s second motion to reopen and reconsider the underlying denial of her

FILED

MAY 03 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-71174

application for cancellation of removal, based on her failure to establish the

requisite hardship to her qualifying United States citizen children.

Pantaleon-Flores has waived any challenge to the BIA’s decision denying

her motion to reopen and reconsider by failing to raise any arguments related to the

BIA’s dispositive determination that the motion was untimely. See MartinezSerrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
USA Radio Network                           2290 Springlake Road, Suite 107
Broadcast Agreement                               Dallas, Texas  75234
                                         (972) 484-3900   Fax:  (972) 241-6826

Date:

Company:

Attention                       Advertiser::

Address                         Product::

                                Representative:

Phone:                          Billing Month:              Order Number:

Fax:                            Week Starting:              Week Ending:



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>      <C>     <C>  <C>    <C>       <C> <C>  <C>  <C>  <C><C>  <C>   <C>   <C>         <C>
Program  Start   End  Len    Daypart   M   Tu   W    Th   F  Sa   Su    X     Weeks       Rate

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

Gross Investment by Broadcast
        Calendar Month
----------------------------
January 2000

February 2000

March 2000

April 2000

May 2000

June 2000

July 2000

August 2000

September 2000

October 2000

November 2000

December 2000

     Total



     The Advertiser agrees to the terms and specifications
contained in this agreement.  The Advertiser or its duly assigned
Agent shall be solely liable for payments to USA Radio Network or
its assignees.  Receipt of signed Broadcast Agreement by
facsimile transmission shall be binding as a legal document in
lieu of original Broadcast Agreement.  Terms are cash with order
unless prior credit approval is granted, then it is Net 15 Days.
Two weeks written notice is required for cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Advertiser Signature           Date



-----------------------------------------------------------------
USA Radio Network Representative         Date
<PAGE>
 
                                                           Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Envirogen, Inc. on Form S-8 (File 333-09267), Form S-8 (File No. 33-54708), Form
S-3 (File No. 333-12883), Form S-3 (File No. 333-6991), Form S-3 (File No. 33-
78982) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-34021) of our report dated February 17, 1999,
on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Envirogen, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the years
ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.



                                    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Florham Park, New Jersey
March 29, 1999

                                      58
1

James M Parker

Manager – Compliance Services, Env.

PPL Montana, LLC

303 N. Broadway, Suite 400

Billings, MT 59101

Tel. 406.740.9998 Fax 406.237.6901

jmparker@pplweb.com

April 10, 2015

- Via Electronic Mail -

Mr. Ed Warner

Environmental Engineer

Montana Department of Environmental Quality

1520 E. Sixth Avenue

P.O. Box 200901

Helena, MT 59620-0901

Re: Permanent Cessation of Operations - Corette

Dear Mr. Warner:

PPL Montana (PPLM) is submitting this written notification of the permanent cessation of 

operations at the JE Corette Steam Electric Station (Corette SES) by April 16, 2015. This 

notification is being submitted per the requirements of ARM 17.8.1224(1)(e) and Section V.J of 

Title V permit OP2953-08. 

In September 2012, based upon an economic evaluation, PPLM announced the decision to place 

Corette SES in long term reserve status. The driving factor in that evaluation was the expense of 

retrofitting the unit with a baghouse for compliance with the upcoming Mercury and Air Toxics 

Standards (MATS). On February 10, 2015, based on an updated evaluation, PPLM announced its

intention to permanently retire the plant, effective August 2015. Because the MATS compliance 

date was April 16, 2015, despite any other designation of retirement date, our intention was that 

the plant would cease operations and any resultant boiler emissions by the MATS compliance 

date of April 16, 2015. Gordon Criswell of PPLM notified MDEQ officials of this fact on 

February 10, 2015. 

Subsequent to the February announcement, PPLM and Northwestern Energy reached agreement 

that per our Generation Interconnection Agreement, the official plant retirement date would be

designated March 18, 2015. The last coal was consumed by the plant on March 3, 2015 as 

driven by market conditions. 

The plant has not operated since March 3, 2015, but for the purposes of ARM 17.8.1224(1)(e) 

and Section V.J of Title V permit OP2953-08, we are designating the cessation of operations the 

MATS compliance date of April 16, 2015 and providing this notification according to those 

timelines. 

Should you have any questions, please call me. Thank you.
2

Sincerely,

James M Parker, PE

Manager, Environmental Compliance Services & Designated Representative

JMP/jmp

eCC: Rodger Godfrey, Julie Merkel – MDEQ

Bob Gallagher, EPA – Helena

Scott Patefield – EPA Region VIII, Denver
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50417 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ERELI JAVIER VERA-ESPINOZA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:00-CR-615-ALL
Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ereli Javier VeraEspinoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Vera-Espinoza has not filed a response. “This Court must examine the basis of itsjurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Article III, section 2, ofthe Constitution limits federal courtjurisdiction to actual cases and United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 11, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50417

2 controversies. S pencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). The case-or-controversy requirement demands that “some concrete and continuing injury other than the now-ended incarceration or parole

– some ‘collateral consequence’ of the conviction – must exist if the suit is to be maintained.” Id. During the pendency ofthis appeal, Vera-Espinoza completed the sentence that was imposed upon the re vocation of his supervised release. The order revoking Vera-Espinoza’s supervised release imposed no further term of supervised release. Accordingly, there is no case or controversy for this court to address, and this appeal is dismissed as moot. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied as unnecessary. APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED.