alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
November 8, 2004


Pegasus Imaging Corporation
4522 Spruce Street, Suite 200
Tampa, FL  33607
Attention:  John A. Berlin

          Re:  That certain ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT dated as of August 5, 2004
               by and among (i) TMS, INC., an Oklahoma corporation ("TMS"), and
               (ii) PIC ACQUISITION, INC., an Oklahoma corporation ("Buyer") and
               (iii) PEGASUS IMAGING CORPORATION, a Florida corporation
               ("Parent") as amended by letter agreement effective October 16,
               2004 (the "Purchase Agreement).

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     This letter amends the Purchase Agreement effective as of November 8, 2004.
Capitalized terms that are not defined in this letter have the meanings given
them in the Purchase Agreement.

     By your execution of the acknowledgement to this letter set forth below,
you hereby agree to the following.

          1.   If TMS does not obtain Shareholder Approval, the Management
               Services shall cease on the day of the Special Meeting or
               December 17, 2004, whichever occurs first.

          2.   On December 17, 2004, TMS shall pay the Parent the Management Fee
               and other fees described in the Purchase Agreement incurred by
               Parent, but unpaid for the period beginning October 16, 2004 and
               ending December 17, 2004.

          3.   The Closing Date and the date specified in Section 10.1(b) of the
               Purchase Agreement each shall be extended to December 17, 2004.

     Except as expressly amended in this letter, the provisions of the Purchase
Agreement are and shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified
and confirmed by the parties.

     This letter may be executed and acknowledged in multiple counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute
one and the same.

                                       Very truly yours,

                                       TMS, Inc.

                                       By:    DEBORAH D. MOSIER
                                       Name:  Deborah D. Mosier
                                       Title:    President


Acknowledged and agreed to this 8th day of November, 2004.

PIC Acquisition, Inc.

By:    JOHN A. BERLIN
Name:  John A. Berlin
Title:    President



Pegasus Imaging Corporation

By:    JOHN A. BERLIN
Name:  John A. Berlin
Title:    President
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4726]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

TA-W-31,733D, Boise Cascade Corp. Timber and Wood Products 
Division Boise, Idaho; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued an Amended Notice of Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on 
October 22, 1996, applicable to all workers of Boise Cascade Corp. 
located in Boise, Idaho. The notice was published in the Federal 
Register on November 6, 1996 (61 FR 57454).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The company reports that 
some workers at the Boise, Idaho location support production of 
products other than lumber and plywood produced at the certified plants 
(TA-W-31,733 and TA-W-31,733A-C). Accordingly, the coverage should be 
limited to those workers in the Timber and Wood Products Division. The 
Department is again amending the worker certification to provide 
coverage only to those support service workers of Boise Cascade Corp., 
Timber and Wood Products in Boise, Idaho.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include only 
those workers of Boise Cascade who were adversely affected by increased 
imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-31,733D is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Boise Cascade Corp., Timber and Wood Products 
Division, Boise, Idaho who became totally or partially separated 
from employment on or after December 7, 1994 are eligible to apply 
for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 
1974.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 12th day of February 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-4726 Filed 2-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Subject Line of Notice: Cancelling Your Income Share Agreement with Sollers College 

Dear [consumer’s name]: 

We’re writing because you have an income share agreement with Sollers College. The Federal 

Trade Commission (FTC), the nation’s consumer protection agency, sued us because they said 

we used deceptive ads and didn’t tell you about some of your rights in our income share 

agreements. 

To settle this lawsuit with the FTC, Sollers College will, among other things: 

• no longer collect any money you owe to Sollers College under your income share agreement. 

You no longer owe any money to Sollers College. You don’t have to do anything. 

• You don’t need to make any more payments, regardless of your income. 

• We will automatically release any holds on your account. 

• We will make certificates or transcripts available upon request. 

• Within 10 business days, we will ask credit bureaus Experian, Equifax and TransUnion to 

delete this debt from your credit report. 

• To get your credit report for free, visit AnnualCreditReport.com. 

Other federal or private student loans are not covered. 

• This settlement covers only what you owe directly to Sollers College. 

• If you have other loans, contact your federal or private loan servicer. 

If you have questions, please contact us at juliettea@sollers.edu or phone 

848.227.4553. For more information about the FTC settlement, visit ftc.gov/sollers. 

Sincerely, 

Paul Alexander 

Manager Licensing & Compliance 

33 Wills Way, Piscataway NJ 08854
----

----

**LIMITED      CONSENT AND SECOND AMENDMENT**

**TO      AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT**

**Agreement**
A. T. MASSEY COAL COMPANY, INC., a Virginia corporation      (the“**Administrative Borrower**”), individually and as agent on behalf      of the other Loan Parties (such term and each other capitalized term used but      not defined 
herein having the meaning given to it inArticle 
I      of the Credit Agreement referenced      below), the Required Lenders signatory hereto, 
UBS AG, 
STAMFORD      BRANCH, as administrative agent      (the “**Administrative Agent**”), and THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS      CREDIT, INC., as collateral agent and as security trustee (the “
**Collateral Agent**”; and together with the      Administrative Agent, the “**Agents**”) for the 
Secured      Parties and Issuing Bank.

**RECITALS**

**Credit Agreement**

**Insurance      Subsidiary**

**Limited      Consent**

**Agreements      and Amendments to Credit      Agreement**
**.  **

**Conditions      to Effectiveness**
**.**

**Representations      and Warranties.**

**Reference      to and Effect upon the Credit Agreement.**

**Costs      and Expenses**

**GOVERNING      LAW**
**.  **

**Headings**

**Counterparts**

----

**ADMINISTRATIVE      BORROWER**

**AGENTS**

**LENDERS**
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodicreport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theperiodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the issuer.

 

 
| Date: February 17,  2009 | Jeffrey P. Orleans      |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                          | Jeffrey P. Orleans      |
|                          | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Not for Publication in West's F ederal Reporter



# U nit edSta tes C ou rt of A pp eal s

For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 09-2360 RAYMOND HERNANDEZ-ALBINO, Petitioner, Appellant,

v. ANTHONY HAYNES, Warden, Respondent, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Aida M. Delgado-Colón, U.S. District Judge]
Before Torruella, Selya and Howard, Circuit Judges.
Raymond Hernández-Albino on brief pro se. Thomas F. Klumper, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Nelson Pérez-Sosa, Assistant U.S. Attorney, a n d Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez, United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
March 12, 2010-2- Per Curiam . We have reviewed the record and the parties'submissions, and we affirm. Despite appellant Raymond HernándezAlbino's (Hernández's) attempt to characterize hi s m o st recent filing as a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, rather than a motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, this court must look to the substance of the motion to determine whether it is governed by the statutory framework set out in 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Trenkler v. United States, 536 F.3d 85, 97 (1st Cir. 2008), cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 1363 (2009). Hernández argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction. This claim falls squarely within the ambit o f s e c t i o n 2255. Cf. Rogers v. United States, 180 F.3d 349, 357 n. 15 (1st Cir. 1999).

Moreover, the "savings clause" of section 2255 does not help Hernández. Only if the remedy available under section 2255 is inadequate or ineffective will a prisoner be allowed to file a section 2241 motion to ch a l l e n ge the legality of his conviction. See Sustache-Rivera v. United States, 221 F.3d 8, 15 (1st Cir. 2000). The remedy in section 2255 does not become "inadequate or ineffective" simply by virtue of the fact that the prisoner is not able to meet the gate-keeping requirements for second or successive petitions. See United States v. Barrett, 178 F.3d 34, 50 (1st Cir. 1999). Even if the court were to treat Hernández's submissions here as a request for permission to file a s e c o n d o r successive-3-

motion pursuant to section 2255, we would deny the request. Hernández does not cite any new evidence; rather, he only argues that the evidence presented at trial did not establish his guilt. See 2 8 U . S .C. § 2255(h)(1). Moreover, he does not cite to a new rule of constitutional law made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(2).

Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27.0(c).
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1339/2006

of 12 September 2006         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 September 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 September 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 12 September 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, L. Stephen Smith, Chief Executive
Officer of The PMI Group, Inc. (Company), hereby certify that the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ L. Stephen Smith   
|                      |  |  |  | L. Stephen Smith       
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

176) ll-K-(F)-4 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:54 AM Sheet 176 of 325 
P.2 

/A R 

II-K-(F)-4 

ENERGY SCENARIO FOR INDUSTRIAL BOILERS NSPS ANALYSIS. 

Letter from T. Hogan, EEA to R. Newcombe, DOE. 

August 23, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(F)-4
#### Shirley SPEDALE, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. S-159.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 23, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Signature Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated this 1st of July, 2011.




/s/ Craig NoellCraig NoellPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME, CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 2, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,872
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,294
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,221
<INVENTORY>                                     41,437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,077
<PP&E>                                         159,593
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,633
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 221,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,180
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,853
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,812
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   221,685
<SALES>                                        287,206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               287,206
<CGS>                                          208,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  269,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,918)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   132
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,939
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,951
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,443
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,508
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,508
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37
        

</TABLE>
701/

Name(pleaseprint) I --~ffi;a;';i-· ·-1--1 E.-Mail ! Phone

ToAi/ k/2i~!YL':________ ... L~~~h.t:!'.-T/C~_~ __ .._~f:~?/Iv'~t;·Z<?~/'_~~e!-·_~~~j7e~~~J!-lr_=~,:r~_~ __ _

!c-~2e--J'1-ili5dY\ i~fA/J&r&~rof£i)~'7P-if \ P;'2-~-'L-83]t1 1

l\CCC\\A.eJ .\~. S\~'b Wl~ _Lrf_~!!!Q_~£\_L~~_Q __J?J~$J\;\({;k1~~~I~~_~~lllj~~J~~/ ~~Lf=T!J~ j

..r[ar-; }),/Jq>rafe--- ... .. _ _~_~__~~_ ---_.~_ t JdipJfUglu:L"'I"J"1,-c..w. t rj-?5J-LJ'fJ..

___ S45>~r( ~11&c/{.~L . ._ (::::(!J ID?Pt./r;.cD_~ h~~_~_._~~J ~P{ cf2-? Jev ZO"L..-.~ j - ~7i....;.9_------' o. ..-'2 'i .J I I r - - -- - -'

!._f1JlA1Ct A ..J)~tL __ .. _... . EfA __._______ HDl\.ty\.11.~L&~gfJj:.&D>/ __~2D2 ..SLp.. (P..tJl:-~-.8.---.J

_.J,~ ..U..!)l» ~~._ _.__._ .c__ . i ~!Jl I L8:! t=_A_~~ £PA~ f;fJJ'; ~,,_~_.i~t:_S!l!!!L~
Required:

Optional:

Meeting with 3M

Calendar Entry

Wed 0410612011 3:00 PM - 4:00

PM

Location: 4140 EPA East

Greg FritzlDC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim WillisIDC/USEPA/US@EPA, Maria

Doa/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Rose AllisonIDC/USEPAlUS@EPA

Andrea Pfahles-Hutchens/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Laurence LibeloIDC/USEPAlUS@EPA,

Susan SharkeyIDCIUSEPA/US@EPA

Agenda:

• lntroducticn

• 3M Brief History& Statusfor LCPFC's

• Bio-rncrutorinq Update

• AFFF Management

• Discussion & Follow up

Attendees

Mike Falco

Gary Hohenstein

Tom DiPasquaie

Julie Hatcher (3M)
<PAGE>   1




                                                                    Exhibit 23.1




              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
Smith Gardner and Associates, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form
S-8 (Regis. No. 333-71669) of Smith Gardner and Associates, Inc. of our report
dated February 12, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Smith
Gardner and Associates, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, redeemable preferred
stock and stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, and the related financial
statement schedule, which report appears in the Company's 1998 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
March 30, 1999
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-61511) pertaining to the Liberty Financial Companies, Inc. Savings
and Investment Plan, in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-61509 and
Form S-8 No. 333-28073) pertaining to the Liberty Financial Companies Inc.
Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-90626) pertaining to the Liberty Financial Companies, Inc. 1990
Stock Option Plan, 1995 Stock Incentive Plan and 1995 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-20067) pertaining to
the Liberty Financial Companies Inc. Dividend Reinvestment Plan of our report
dated January 29, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedules of Liberty Financial Companies, Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 2001
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 77 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the issuance of national 

injunctions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. BIGGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the 

issuance of national injunctions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Injunctive Authority 

5 Clarification Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ORDERS PURPORTING TO RESTRAIN ENFORCE7 MENT AGAINST NON-PARTIES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 155 of title 28, United 

9 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 77 IH

1 ‘‘§ 2285. Orders purporting to restrain enforcement 

2 against non-parties 

3 ‘‘No court of the United States (and no district court 

4 of the Virgin Islands, Guam, or the Northern Mariana Is5 lands) shall issue an order that purports to restrain the 

6 enforcement against a non-party of any statute, regula7 tion, order, or similar authority, unless the non-party is 

8 represented by a party acting in a representative capacity 

9 pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.’’. 

10 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

11 for chapter 155 of title 28, United States Code is amended 

12 by inserting after the item relating to section 2285 the 

13 following: 

‘‘2285. Orders purporting to restrain enforcement against non-parties.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 2/27/2023 | Document No. 607039 | PAGE Page 1 of 1 * PUBLIC *; 

__________________________________________ 

PUBLIC 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Microsoft Corp., )

 a corporation, and ) 

) Docket No. 9412 

Activision Blizzard, Inc., )

 a corporation, ) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

__________________________________________) 

ORDER GRANTING THIRD AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

On February 24, 2023, non-party Google LLC (“Google”) filed a third motion to extend 

the time for it to file a motion to quash or limit a subpoena served on Google by Respondent 

Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) (“Motion”). Google states that Microsoft and Google are 

engaged in ongoing negotiations as to the scope of document production and that further 

negotiations may narrow or eliminate areas of dispute. Google further states that Microsoft 

agrees to the extension requested in the Motion. 

Upon review and consideration of the Motion, the Motion is GRANTED. It is hereby 

ORDERED that Google’s deadline to file a motion to quash or limit Microsoft’s subpoena is 

extended to March 3, 2023. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: February 27, 2023