alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       77,650
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          12,228
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         1,994
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   3,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,065
<COMMON>                                         4,811
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        9,201
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             16,866
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  28,965
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        600
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            23,500
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               8,700
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  33,300
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   95,065
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       36,896
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             1,103
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      10,425
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      11,528
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          3,450
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 191
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   3,641
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,454
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,187
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         14
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    2,173
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           975
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        1,118
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           5,039
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                 -------------
                                    FORM 6-K
                                 -------------

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
                       PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                          FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL, 2014

                       COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-29832
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            CHELSEA OIL AND GAS LTD.
                (TRANSLATION OF REGISTRANT'S NAME INTO ENGLISH)

       -----------------------------------------------------------------
                              3200, 500 4TH AVENUE
                                CALGARY, ALBERTA
                                 CANADA T2P 2V6
                             (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL
                               EXECUTIVE OFFICES)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                          Form 20-F [X]        Form 40-F [_]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b) (1): [_]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b) (7): [_]

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                              Yes[_]       No[X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-

<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                            CHELSEA OIL & GAS LTD.

Date: May 1, 2014                           By:  /s/ Jesse Meidl
                                                 ----------------
                                                 Name:  Jesse Meidl
                                                 Title:  Chief Executive Officer





                                       2
<PAGE>





                                 EXHIBIT INDEX

 EXHIBIT

99.1      Press release dated April 30, 2014

99.2      Audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December
          31, 2013 and 2012

99.3      Management Discussion and Analysis for the years ended December 31,
          2013 and 2012








                                       3
<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,As adopted pursuant toSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Binding Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2003, (the "Report"), I, Dennis J.Martin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:

/s/ Dennis J. Martin
 
Dennis J. Martin
 
Chairman, President and Chief      Executive Officer
 
August 13, 2003
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 10(qq)

                   Amendment Number 1 to Employment Agreement



      This Amendment Number 1 to Employment Agreement (the "Amendment") amends
that certain Employment Agreement by and between Oxford Health Plans, Inc. (the
"Company") and Norman C. Payson, M.D. ("Executive"), effective as of February
23, 1998 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall
have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement.

      The Company and the Executive, pursuant to, and in accordance with,
Section 13 of the Agreement, hereby agree to amend the Agreement by replacing
the second sentence of Section 4(b)(i) in its entirety with the following
sentence:

      "As promptly as practicable, and in any event no later than April 15,
      1999, the Company shall, at its expense, cause all shares subject to the
      Option to be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
      "Securities Act"), and registered or qualified under applicable state
      laws, to be freely resold."

      This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the
different parties hereto on separate counterparts, each of which when so
executed and delivered shall be an original, but all of which constitute one and
the same instrument.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment this 19th
day of December, 1998.

                                          OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, INC.



                                          By: /s/ JEFFERY H. BOYD
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Jeffery H. Boyd, Executive Vice
                                              President and General Counsel


                                              /s/ NORMAN C. PAYSON
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Norman C. Payson, M.D.
#### Bill BAKER, a/k/a William M. Baker, Appellant, v. James A. O’NEIL and Dr. J. Robert Doty, Appellees.

No. 70-160.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 22, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Brevard County; Joe A. Cowart, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 701

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 25 percent

investment tax credit for recycling equipment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 1993

Mr. VOLKMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

a 25 percent investment tax credit for recycling equipment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 25 PERCENT INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT FOR RE4 CYCLING EQUIPMENT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 46 of the

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking

7 ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (2), by striking the period

8 at the end of paragraph (3) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and

9 by adding at the end thereof the following new paragraph:
2

HR 701 IH

1 ‘‘(4) in the case of recycling equipment (as de2 fined in section 48(l)(2)(A)(iv)), the recycling per3 centage.’’

4 (b) RECYCLING PERCENTAGE.—Subsection (b) of

5 section 46 of such Code is amended by adding at the end

6 thereof the following new paragraph:

7 ‘‘(5) RECYCLING PERCENTAGE.—The term ‘re8 cycling percentage’ means 25 percent.’’

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 this section shall apply to periods after December 31,

11 1993, under rules similar to the rules of section 48(m)

12 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Æ
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrants form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1997        
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           32
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 32
<PP&E>                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   32
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         3,835
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                  4,076,623
<OTHER-SE>                              (2,182,988)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     32
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              2,678  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,678)       
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,678)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (0.0007)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
                           

</TABLE>
PUBLIC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

__________________________________________

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Microsoft Corp., ) 

 a corporation, and ) 

) Docket No. 9412 

Activision Blizzard, Inc., ) 

 a corporation, ) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

__________________________________________)

ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

On November 13, 2023, non-party Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC (“SIE”) filed an 

agreed motion to extend the time for SIE to file a motion to quash or limit a subpoena served on 

SIE by Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) Complaint Counsel from November 13, 2023 to 

November 21, 2023 (“Motion”). 

SIE represents that negotiations between SIE and Complaint Counsel are ongoing and 

that further negotiations may narrow or eliminate areas of dispute. SIE states that, pursuant to the 

October 26, 2023 Order granting Complaint Counsel’s Motion to Allow Discovery Regarding 

Respondents’ Agreements with Ubisoft Entertainment SA and Sony Interactive Entertainment 

LLC, Complaint Counsel has until December 21, 2023 to complete fact discovery, and, 

therefore, the requested extension will not delay the progress of these proceedings. SIE further 

states that Complaint Counsel agrees with the relief requested in the Motion. 

FTC Rule 4.3(b) authorizes the Administrative Law Judge, except in circumstances not 

here presented, to extend any time limit prescribed by the rules “[f]or good cause shown.” 16 

C.F.R. § 4.3(b). Based on the representations in the Motion, SIE has demonstrated good cause

for the requested extension. Accordingly, the Motion is GRANTED and it is hereby ORDERED

that SIE’s deadline for filing any motion to limit or quash or otherwise respond to the subpoena

pursuant to FTC Rule 3.34(c) is extended to November 21, 2023.

ORDERED:

D. Michael Chappell

Chief Administrative Law Judge

Date: November 14, 2023 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 11/14/2023 OSCAR NO 608923 | PAGE Page 1 of 1 * -PUBLIC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from General
Binding Corporation's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,444
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,649<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,513
<INVENTORY>                                    123,119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               298,070
<PP&E>                                         183,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 639,446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,363
<BONDS>                                        298,832
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,262
<OTHER-SE>                                     172,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   639,446
<SALES>                                        180,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               180,505
<CGS>                                          104,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   601
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,286
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,514
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,772
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,772
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
<FN>
<F1>Notes and accounts receivable-trade are stated net of allowances for doubtful
accounts and sales returns.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
261 La. 223

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Cleophus ETHRIDGE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52258.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 22, 1972.

In re: Cleophus Ethridge applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction.
#### Grimpe, Appellant, *v.*Fedders.

*357Argued April 20, 1934.

Before Tkexler, P. J., Keller, Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*Clair D, Moss,*for appellant.

No book or appearance for appellee.

July 13, 1934:

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This was an action in replevin brought by a father to recover from his daughter a pair of diamond earrings and some other personal property which, he alleged, belonged to him and had been taken with him when he went to live with his daughter; and which she thereafter took possession of and refused to return to him when he quitted her residence. His title to the earrings was based on an alleged gift of them made by his wife, — who admittedly had owned them,— shortly before her death.

*358While no answer appears in the record the docket entries show that one was filed, and appellant’s counsel states that in it the defendant set up title to the earrings and averred that her mother had given them to her in her lifetime. During the trial, however, she moved the court to permit her to amend her answer by averring instead that she had obtained title to the articles in suit by a gift from her father, the plaintiff in the action. The amendment was allowed and thereafter the issue in the case was: Had the plaintiff made a gift of the articles in suit to the defendant? On this issue, the defendant had the affirmative, and hence the burden was on her to prove it by the weight of the evidence: 1 Greenleaf on Evidence, sec. 74; Maxler v. Hawk, 233 Pa. 316, 322, 82 A. 251; McConville v. Ingham, 268 Pa. 507, 518, 112 A. 85; Yeager’s Est., 273 Pa. 359, 362, 117 A. 67.

Had the case gone to the jury on the issue made by the statement and answer as originally filed, the burden of proof would have rested on the plaintiff of showing by the weight of the evidence that his wife had made a gift of the earrings to him. When, however, the defendant, by the amendment to her answer, shifted her ground and based her title to the articles in dispute on a gift from the plaintiff, she, in effect, admitted the prior title of the plaintiff to them — for in order to be able to transmit title to her, as claimed, her father must have' owned the articles transferred — , but she claimed to overcome that title by a gift made by him to her. The burden of proving this gift was clearly on her, and the court should so have instructed the jury, instead of charging them that the burden of proof was upon the plaintiff of establishing his case by the fair weight or preponderance of the evidence (178-a).

The first assignment of error is sustained. The judgment is reversed and a new .trial awarded.
#### Thomas BUNK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-306.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 5, 1972.

Thomas Bunk, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J, and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within *28which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMPANY

(Section 302)

I, George M. Bachman, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Florida Public Utilities Company (the registrant);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 19, 2007

By  /s/ George M. Bachman

George M. Bachman

Chief Financial Officer