alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TORULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT**

I,Douglas W. Sabra, Chief Financial Officer of Forward Industries, Inc.("Forward") certify that:

-  I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10‐Q for the three months ended December 31, 2006, of Forward; 
-  Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;
-  Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of Forward as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;
-  Forward's other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a‐15(e) and 15d‐15(e))for Forward and we have:

-  designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating toForward, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;
-  Not applicable; 
-  evaluated the effectiveness ofForward's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report  based on such evaluation;and
-  disclosed in this report anychange in Forward's internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring Forward's most recent fiscal quarter (Forward's fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, Forward's internal control over financialreporting; and

-  Forward's other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to Forward's auditors and the audit committee ofForward's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

-  all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Forward'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;  and 
-  any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in Forward'sinternal controls over financial reporting.

Date: February 7, 2007

/s/Douglas W. SabraDouglas W. SabraChiefFinancial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### LOU-SID CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, d/b/a President Hotel, Appellant, v. BELCHER OIL COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-503.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 23, 1969.

Maurice Rosen, No. Miami Beach, for appellant.

Sherouse, Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Okell, W. Palm Beach, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Wagner v. Associated Shower Door Company, Fla.App.1958, 99 So.2d 619.
EXHIBIT 12-1

                           FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION

                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF
              EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                                    ($000'S)
                                    UNAUDITED

                                                                      6 months
                                                                        2000
                                                                        ----
EARNINGS:
---------

Net earnings                                                           $ 17,019
Taxes on income                                                           9,232
Total fixed charges                                                      51,494
Capitalized interest                                                     (2,983)
Capitalized interest amortized                                            1,092
Equity earnings of non-consolidated associated
     companies accounted for
     by the equity method, net of dividends                              (3,534)
                                                                       --------

                                                                       $ 72,320
                                                                       ========
FIXED CHARGES:
--------------

Interest expense (includes dividend on
     preferred security of $7,875)                                     $ 38,921
Capitalized interest                                                      2,983
Imputed Interest on non-capitalized lease payment                         9,590
                                                                       --------

                                                                       $ 51,494
                                                                       ========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                         1.40
                                                                       ========



Note: There were no preferred shares outstanding during the period indicated
and, therefore, the consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges and combined
fixed charges and preferred share dividend requirements would have been the same
as the consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges and combined fixed
charges for the period indicated.

This calculation does not relate to the amended and restated Revolving Credit
Agreement covenants.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains a summary of financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                          81,868
<SECURITIES>                                   180,504
<RECEIVABLES>                                  399,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                    38,413
<INVENTORY>                                    862,443
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,687,787
<PP&E>                                       1,191,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                 532,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,488,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,195,068
<BONDS>                                      1,723,962
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        906
<COMMON>                                        71,086
<OTHER-SE>                                     826,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,488,387
<SALES>                                        974,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               974,750
<CGS>                                          528,913
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  957,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                24,796
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,604
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,063)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,344)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,503)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,503)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
EXTENSION AGREEMENT

 

WHEREAS, Aduddell Industries, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation, (“Buyer”) and Greg Hayden, an individual resident in New York, (“Seller”) are parties to a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of December 29, 2006; and 

 

WHEREAS, Section 2.3 of the Agreement provide for a closing on or before March 15, 2007; and

 

WHEREAS, Buyer and Seller desire to extend the closing date; and

 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree; 

 

|   | 1. | The date of Closing provided for in the Agreement is hereby extended until May 18, 2007. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | As compensation for this agreement to extend the closing date Aduddell Industries shall pay Greg Hayden $50,000 (Fifty thousand dollars) at closing. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | The discussions and commitments in our January 9, 2007 letter (attached) remain valid and binding. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | Typographical errors and formatting in the original document will be corrected in a final document coordinated between counsels by April 15th 2007. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 5. | The original agreement and the extension are under the jurisdiction of New York law. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

In witness thereof, the parties have executed and delivered this extension agreement as of the 21st day of March, 2007.  

 

|   | “Buyer” |
|--------|-------------------|

 

ADUDDELL INDUSTRIES, INC. 

 

 

|   | By: | /s/ Reggie Cook |
|--------|-----|-----------------|

|   | Reggie Cook |
|--------|-------------|

 

 

|   | “Seller” |
|--------|--------------------|

 

GREG HAYDEN

 

 

|   | By: | /s/ Greg Hayden |
|--------|-----|-----------------|

|   | Greg Hayden |
|--------|-------------|
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________
No. 02

- 19

- 00046

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding Trial Court No. CV18

- 1720

Before Bassel, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### SSCP M ANAGEMENT


### , I NC 

### ., SD HAROD 

### E NTERPRISES 

### , I NC 

### ., A PPLE 

### T EXAS 

### R ESTAURANTS


### , I NC 

### ., T EXAS 

### A PPLE 

### , L LC, SRS R EAL 

### E STATE 

### P ARTNERS


### , LLC, AND 

### SRS N ATIONAL 

### N ET 

### L EASE 

### G ROUP 

### , LP , Relator s2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has conside red relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of

mandamus is d ismissed as moot

. 1

Per Curiam

Delivered: March 1, 2019

1 It has come to the court’s attention that Re spondent has entered an amended order; thus, the order that is at the crux of the petition for writ of mandamus is no longer at issue.
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with The Beard Company's (the "Company") Report on Form 10-Q for
the period  ended March 31,  2006, as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William M. Beard, Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Date:  May 22, 2006                   By:         /s/ William M. Beard
                                                      William M. Beard
                                                  Chairman of the Board and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
#### Kenneth E. ACRE, Sr., Appellant, v. Geraldine L. ACRE, Appellee.

No. 72-1189.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 12, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Saul GOODMAN, Appellant, v. Richard H. OLSEN, Appellee.

No. 72-798.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 9, 1973.

Frank Ragano and Raymond E. LaPorte, Miami, for appellant.

Prunty, Ross, DeLoach & Olsen, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

*448ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on November 17, 1972 (269 So.2d 782) granting appellee’s motion to dismiss appeal in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed May 9, 1973 (278 So.2d 612) and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment with directions that this appeal be reinstated;

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the final order of this court heretofore issued in this court on December 6, 1972 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed November 17, 1972 is vacated and, according to the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida, this appeal is hereby reinstated and shall proceed to oral argument. Counsel will be notified as to date and time.
#### John BARNHILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-801.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                  1,014
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                           1,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                0  
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS><F1>                        0
<PP&E>                                167,556
<DEPRECIATION>                         42,702           
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        173,278      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES><F1>                   0
<BONDS>                               117,405      
<COMMON>                                   72 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                             30,739           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          173,278      
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       32,406     
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          28,684     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          514
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     12,354    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         3,509    
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     3,509    
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            3,509   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .56 
<FN>                                        
<F1> Mid-Atlantic Realty Trust (MART) is in the specialized real estate
<F1> industry for which the current/noncurrent distinction is deemed in
<F1> practice to have little or no relevance.  Therefore, MART prepares
<F1> unclassified balance sheets which do not report current assets or
<F1> current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
April17, 2012 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany, Chief 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Department or Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

176 Airport Circle • Room 115 

Beaver, WV 25813-9475 

Phone 304.255.0476 • Fax 304.253.2095 

I 

r"-' 

RE: Essential Air Service Docket OST-1997-2761 

Dear Mr DeVany: 

Reference to the Essential Air Service Docket OST-1997-2761, final comment period, 

the Raleigh County Memorial Airport Authority (BKW) has unanimously chosen the 

proposal offered by Silver Airways, with 26 weekly frequencies or two weekday 

roundtrips one of which would operate on a (one) one-stop basis, and one non stop. With 

approval, three total week-end operations under a code share with United Airlines, 

service to Washington DC Dulles Airport (lAD). The service will utilize a Saab-340 

thirty-four passenger cabin class aircraft. 

With approval by the Department we would appreciate the option, of moving the 

proposed additional week-end flights into the weekly frequency to accommodate the 

demand,\V~~Q!!~cessru:y in support of the N(l!ional Boy Scout Sununit operations, 

Military Induction Center and the PGA Golf Tournament at no additional subsidy 

funding. 

The Silver Airways proposal being the only RFP received, and that proposal being 

contingent upon an agreement with United Airlines as a code share, (and should that fail), 

requests your consideration of a link with the Greenbrier Valley Airport, Lewisburg, WV 

(LWB) service to Atlanta, GA (ATL). This alternate connection would serve our 

comm.unity and our mission of support to the entities mentioned above. 

As a rural community and Airport Authority we are appreciative of the EAS program and 

what it means to our economic future, we continue to capture the market in this area and 

in southern West Virginia. 
I thank you and Kevin Schlemmer for the support you offer, please give me a call if I can 

assist you and your staff. 

Sincerely 

~C~L- Tom Cochran 

Airport Manager
NUMBER   INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE    SHARES

                      THE RATTLESNAKE HOLDING COMPANY, INC.

                      SERIES B CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                            $.10 PAR VALUE PER SHARE
                             500,000 SHARES AUTHORIZED     SEE LEGEND ON REVERSE


     This is to certify that ___________________ is the owner of________________

___________________________________________fully paid and non-assessable  shares
of the above  Corporation  transferable  only on the books of the Corporation by
the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of the
Certificate properly endorsed.

Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized
officers.
Dated:


__________________________                               _______________________
        Secretary                                               President

The following  abbreviations,  when used in the  inscription on the face of this
Certificate,  shall  be  construed  as  though  they  were  written  out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM   -- as tenants in common      UNIF GIFT MIN ACT--.....Custodian........
TEN BNT   -- as tenants by the entireties                 (Cust)         (Minor)
JT TEN    -- as joint tenants with right of        under Uniform Gifts to Minors
             survivorship and not as tenants       Act..........................
             in common                                       (State)
             Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above
             list

   For Value Received, _____ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
   IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF
ASSIGNEE)

________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________Shares
represented  by  the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute
and appoint ___________________________________ Attorney to transfer the said
Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises.

         Dated _____________________            ________________________________
                  In presence of

____________________________________            ________________________________





                    NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT
                    MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN
                    UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY
                    PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
                    ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from the Temtex Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries financial statements for the nine months ended May 31,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,040
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,504
<ALLOWANCES>                                       357
<INVENTORY>                                      8,745
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,785
<PP&E>                                          21,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,375
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,597
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           720
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,821
<SALES>                                         19,427
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,427
<CGS>                                           16,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    11
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   122
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,575)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,162)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,413)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   5,434
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,021
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .86


</TABLE>
261 La. 1043

#### Paul DUFRENE, Jr., and Mrs. Rosalie Dufrene v. Dr. Harold FAGET and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.

No. 52443.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 1972.

In re: Dr. Harold Faget and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 260 So.2d 76.

Writ denied. Under the facts found by the court of appeal, there is no error of law.