alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains a summary of financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Earnings and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                         543,336
<SECURITIES>                                   299,355
<RECEIVABLES>                                  399,670
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,953
<INVENTORY>                                    688,590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,067,693
<PP&E>                                         942,974
<DEPRECIATION>                                 373,819
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,454,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          992,023
<BONDS>                                        812,312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,147
<COMMON>                                        70,731
<OTHER-SE>                                     943,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,454,928
<SALES>                                        768,698
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               768,698
<CGS>                                          454,836
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  736,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                28,063
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,230
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,558
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,672
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,672
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
#### Donald Ray WELLS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2161.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 24, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 27, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Margarita Esquiroz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury of burglary and grand larceny.

He seeks reversal of his convictions on the grounds (1) that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress confessions without an unequivocal and explicit finding *1222of voluntariness, and (2) that the court erred in sentencing the defendant to fifteen years imprisonment at hard labor.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and considered the briefs and arguments of counsel and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated as to the conviction. *Wilson v. State,*304 So.2d 119 (Fla.1974).

As to the appellant’s contention that the court erred in sentencing the defendant to fifteen years imprisonment at hard labor we hold that the court erred in specifying hard labor in "the sentence. There is no statutory authority for sentencing a convicted person to hard labor. Therefore the words hard labor are stricken from the sentence and it is affirmed as amended. *Speller v. State,*305 So.2d 231 (Fla.2d DCA 1974).

Affirmed.

PEARSON, Judge

(dissenting).

I would reverse because, in my view, reversible error appears upon the failure of the trial judge to follow the requirements which are laid out in *McDole v. State,*283 So.2d 553 (Fla.1973), for a conviction based upon a confession.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26255-26256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12145]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-83-2018]


Foreign-Trade Zone 38--Spartanburg County, South Carolina; 
Application for Subzone; Black & Decker, Inc.; Fort Mill, South 
Carolina

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) by the South Carolina State Ports Authority, grantee of FTZ 
38, requesting subzone status for the facility of Black

[[Page 26256]]

& Decker, Inc., located in Fort Mill, South Carolina. The application 
was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones 
Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of the Board 
(15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on May 30, 2018.
    The proposed subzone (19 acres) is located at 4260 Pleasant Road, 
Fort Mill, South Carolina. Black & Decker indicates that it will 
conduct the same activity as currently authorized by the FTZ Board at 
its Subzone 38E. No additional authorization for production activity 
has been requested at this time. The proposed subzone would be subject 
to the existing activation limit of FTZ 38.
    In accordance with the Board's regulations, Qahira El-Amin of the 
FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make 
recommendations to the Executive Secretary.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at the address 
below. The closing period for their receipt is July 16, 2018. Rebuttal 
comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period 
may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to July 31, 2018.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, 
Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the ``Reading Room'' section of the 
Board's website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Qahira El-Amin at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e4b5858c8d9685caa188c9a5898d8aa49096858081ca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b4a7a7372697a355e77365a7672755b6f697a7f7e357c746d">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 482-5928.

    Dated: May 30, 2018.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-12145 Filed 6-5-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Official Journal L 225/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.225.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 225 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5327 August 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2010.225.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 225

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5327 August 2010

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EU) No 763/2010 of 26 August 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EU) No 764/2010 of 26 August 2010 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 877/2009 for the 2009/10 marketing year | 3 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Commission Directive 2010/57/EU of 26 August 2010 amending Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC to renew the inclusion of imazalil as active substance (1) | 5 |
| | * | Commission Directive 2010/59/EU of 26 August 2010 amending Directive 2009/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws of the Member States on extraction solvents used in the production of foodstuffs and food ingredients (1) | 10 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EU) No 763/2010 of 26 August 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Regulation (EU) No 764/2010 of 26 August 2010 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 877/2009 for the 2009/10 marketing year

3

DIRECTIVES

*

Commission Directive 2010/57/EU of 26 August 2010 amending Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC to renew the inclusion of imazalil as active substance (1)

5

*

Commission Directive 2010/59/EU of 26 August 2010 amending Directive 2009/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws of the Member States on extraction solvents used in the production of foodstuffs and food ingredients (1)

10

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT NO. 3.3

[exhibit33articlesofamendm001.jpg]









ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

TO

CERTIFICATE OF REINCORPORATION

OF

FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMPANY





Pursuant to the provisions of §607.1006, Florida Statutes, FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMPANY, a Florida corporation (the Company) has executed these Articles of Amendment to its Certificate of Reincorporation:



1.

Amendment adopted: Section III of the Companys Certificate of Reincorporation was amended to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, $1.50 par value per share, from 6,000,000 to 10,000,000 shares.



2.

The date of the amendments adoption: May 25, 2004.



3.

Adoption of Amendment(s): The amendment was approved by the shareholders.  The number of votes cast for the amendment was sufficient for approval.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these articles of Amendment were signed by the undersigned this 23 day of May, 2008.





By:/s/ Jack English

Name:

Jack English

Title:

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Exhibit 11



ALLEGIANT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
LOSS PER SHARE
DECEMBER 31, 1997


Shares                     Days                      Shares for
Issued (1)                 Outstanding               Calculation

3,634,000                  365                        3,634,000
  939,545                  May 19, 1995                 581,746
                           226
   186,250                 July 11, 1995                 88,277
                           173
   250,000                 September 29, 1995            64,385
                           94
    32,500                 November 11, 1995              4,184
-----------                                        ------------
                           47
 5,042,295                 December 31, 1995          4,372,592
-----------                                        ------------

 5,042,295                 365                        5,042,295
   250,000                 March 7, 1996                204,794
                           299
   815,000                 April 26, 1996               555,986
----------                                         ------------
                           249
 6,107,295                 December 31, 1996          5,803,075
---------                                          ------------

 6,107,295                 365                        6,107,295
   285,712                 April 15, 1997               203,521
----------                                        -------------
                           260
 6,393,007                 December 31, 1997          6,310,816
---------                                         -------------

(1) Excludes escrow shares (1997-1,350,000; 1996 and 1995-2,000,000).

1997 EPS
($599,019)/6,310,816                                 ($0.09)

1996 EPS
($2,754,589)/5,803,075                              ($0.47)

1995 EPS
($1,057,366)/4,372,592                              ($0.24)
# C_2012227EN.01003703.xml

| 28.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/37

---

Action brought on 28 May 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-57/12)

2012/C 227/63

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision to reduce the applicant’s invalidity allowance for the months of June to September 2011.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Commission’s decision, in so far as, ultraque incerta sunt, it exists, rejecting the request of 19 October 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission’s decision, in so far as, ultraque incerta sunt, it exists, rejecting the request of 19 October 2011;

ultraque incerta sunt

| — | Annul the Commission’s decision, in so far as, ultraque incerta sunt, it exits, rejecting the request of 20 October 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission’s decision, in so far as, ultraque incerta sunt, it exits, rejecting the request of 20 October 2011;

ultraque incerta sunt

| — | Annul each of the decisions, if and to the extent that, ultraque incerta sunt, they exist, on the basis of which the Commission unlawfully deducted from each monthly instalment of the invalidity allowance to which the applicant was entitled for the months of June to September 2011 sums totalling EUR 1 661, and annul the decisions, if and to the extent that they exist, to make those deductions; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul each of the decisions, if and to the extent that, ultraque incerta sunt, they exist, on the basis of which the Commission unlawfully deducted from each monthly instalment of the invalidity allowance to which the applicant was entitled for the months of June to September 2011 sums totalling EUR 1 661, and annul the decisions, if and to the extent that they exist, to make those deductions;

ultraque incerta sunt

| — | Order the Commission to pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 1 661, together with interest on that sum at the rate of 15 % per annum, with annual capitalisation, from 27 October 2011 until the date on which sums in question are actually paid, |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 1 661, together with interest on that sum at the rate of 15 % per annum, with annual capitalisation, from 27 October 2011 until the date on which sums in question are actually paid,

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
#### Larry COLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-458.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 19, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
Page of 

Prescribed by: DoDD 1344.10

PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE. DD FORM 2645, MAY 2020

VOTER REGISTRATION INFORMATION

1. If you are not registered to vote where you live now, would you like to apply to register to vote here today? 

 (X one)

YES NO

IF YOU DO NOT MARK EITHER BOX, YOU WILL BE CONSIDERED TO HAVE DECIDED NOT TO REGISTER TO 

VOTE AT THIS TIME. 

Applying to register or declining to register to vote will not affect the amount of assistance that you will be provided by this 

agency. 

If you would like help filling out the voter registration application form, we will help you. The decision whether to seek or 

accept help is yours. You may fill out the application form in private.

If you believe that someone has interfered with your right to register or to decline to 

register to vote, your right to privacy in deciding whether to register or in applying to 

register to vote, or your right to choose your own political party or other political 

preference, you may file a complaint with: 

Federal Voting Assistance Program 

Department of Defense 

4800 Mark Center Drive, Suite 05E22 

Alexandria, VA 22350-5000 

Telephone Number: 800-438-VOTE 

Email: VOTE@FVAP.gov.

If you decline to register to vote, that information will remain confidential and will only be used for voter registration 

purposes. 

If you register to vote, information regarding the office in which the application was submitted will remain 

confidential and only be used for voter registration purposes.

2. PRINTED NAME 3. SIGNATURE 4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

GENERAL COUNSEL 

March 16,2010 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Registered Mail - Return Receipt Requested 

Mr. Abdul Shukor Ismail 

Cabin Systems Engineer 

Etihad Airways 

P.O. Box 35566 

Khalifa City A, 

Abu-Dhabi, 

United Arab Emirates 

Dear Mr. Ismail: 

Re: Equivalent Alternative Determination 

Request Concerning 14 CFR 382.61 

This letter is a follow-up to a letter sent to Etihad Airways (Etihad) by the Department on 

September 10,2009, concerning Etihad's request for an equivalent alternative determination 

from the movable aisle armrest requirement contained in 14 CFR 382.61 of the 

Department's Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA) regulation. In the September 10 letter, we 

requested that Etihad provide the Department with a video or other demonstration showing 

carrier-assisted and self-assisted transfers of a person with a mobility impairment to and 

from its first class seat without lifting the person over the aisle armrest. 

We have reviewed the materials and videos you provided in response to our September 10 

request. Based on the information submitted, it appears that Etihad's first class seat is 

equipped with an armrest that moves completely out of the way while the seatback remains in 

an upright position, which permits a passenger with a mobility impairment to safely make an 

unobstructed transfer from an aisle wheelchair to his or her aircraft seat. Therefore, Etihad's 

first class seat has a movable aisle armrest as required by 14 CFR 382.61 and an equivalent 

alternative determination by the Department is not needed. 

If you have any questions about this matter, please contact James Fisher, of my staff, or me 

at (202) 366-9342. You may also reach us by FAX at (202) 366-7152. 

Sincerely, 

Samuel Podberesky 

Assistant General Counsel for 

A viation Enforcement and Proceedings
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic NewAction Worksheet with 58 QPM# AIR-ANM-030-F7
Date: December 17, 2008 Revision 1


## Record ofContacts "2G10 - 1203 FDMSDocket No.FAA-W~ With whom outside the FAAhas this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Pel·son Contacted Date Boeing Sadayoshi Takara 

### 711312010 ATA 

### Mark Lopez 712112010

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master List to Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5


 <S>                                 <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                                   YEAR
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998
 <PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<CASH>                                      4,446,542
 <SECURITIES>                                       0
 <RECEIVABLES>                              4,496,389
 <ALLOWANCES>                                       0
 <INVENTORY>                               74,109,762
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                         109,145,407
 <PP&E>                                     2,225,629
 <DEPRECIATION>                                     0
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                           108,145,407
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     94,175,263
 <BONDS>                                            0
 <COMMON>                                      28,663
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
 <PREFERRED>                                        6
 <OTHER-SE>                                13,941,475
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             108,145,407
 <SALES>                                   32,077,817
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                          36,400,605
 <CGS>                                              0
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                          30,178,502
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         5,434,806
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                              787,297
 <INCOME-TAX>                                 449,836
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                          337,461
 <DISCONTINUED>                                     0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
 <CHANGES>                                          0
 <NET-INCOME>                                 337,461
 <EPS-BASIC>                                   .012
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                   .012



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50417

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ERELI JAVIER VERA-ESPINOZA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:00-CR-615-ALL

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ereli Javier VeraEspinoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Vera-Espinoza has not filed a

response. 

“This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion,

if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Article III,

section 2, ofthe Constitution limits federal court jurisdiction to actual cases and

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 11, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-50417

2

controversies. Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). The case-or-controversy

requirement demands that “some concrete and continuing injury other than the

now-ended incarceration or parole – some ‘collateral consequence’ of the

conviction – must exist if the suit is to be maintained.” Id. 

During the pendency ofthis appeal, Vera-Espinoza completed the sentence

that was imposed upon the revocation of his supervised release. The order

revoking Vera-Espinoza’s supervised release imposed no further term of

supervised release. Accordingly, there is no case or controversy for this court to

address, and this appeal is dismissed as moot. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is

denied as unnecessary.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED.