alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 593 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 593

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the business 
 deduction for any amount paid or incurred for regularly scheduled air 
  transportation to the extent such amount exceeds the normal tourist 
                  class fare for such transportation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1993

  Mr. Jacobs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the business 
 deduction for any amount paid or incurred for regularly scheduled air 
  transportation to the extent such amount exceeds the normal tourist 
                  class fare for such transportation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) section 162 of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to trade or business 
expenses) is amended by redesignating subsection (m) as subsection (n) 
and by inserting after subsection (l) the following new subsection:
    ``(m) Deduction for Regularly Scheduled Air Transportation Limited 
to Normal Tourist Class Fare.--
            ``(1) In general.--No deduction shall be allowed under 
        subsection (a) or under section 212 for any amount paid or 
        incurred for the transportation of any person by air on a 
        regularly scheduled flight to the extent that such amount 
        exceeds the normal tourist class fare for such transportation 
        on such flight.
            ``(2) Normal tourist class fare.--For purposes of paragraph 
        (1), the term `normal tourist class fare' means the lowest fare 
        charged for the transportation of a person by air on a 
        regularly scheduled flight determined without regard to any 
        special fares available to groups or certain persons or under 
        certain special conditions.''.
    (b) The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply to amounts 
paid or incurred after the date of the enactment of this Act for 
transportation beginning after such date.

                                 <all>
```
#### Johnnie M. HOLDEN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. P-90.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 15, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
No. 00-852.

#### Patch et al. *v.*Connecticut Valley Electric Co. et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### George WINSTON and Ruth Winston, Appellants, v. Ruth M. ABELOW, Appellee.

No. 69-642.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 3, 1970.

Rehearing Denied April 10, 1970.

Shalle Stephen Fine, Miami, for appellants.

Nicholson, Howard, Brawner & Lovett, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ., and SPECTOR, SAM, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The record on appeal briefs, and arguments of counsel having been considered and it appearing therefrom that the appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error, the final judgment appealed herein is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### Edward ADAMS, Jr., and John Robert Beatty, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-928.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 5, 1973.

Rehearing Denied July 3, 1973.

Richard G. Taylor, Miami, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Before CHARLES A. CARROLL, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lashley v. State, Fla.1953, 67 So.2d 648; Koptyra v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 628; State v. Rouse, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 79; State v. Liptak, Fla. 1973, 277 So.2d 19.
#### Laura BAIN, a widow, Appellant, v. NITE OWL, INC., a Florida corporation, and Shell’s City-Weinkles Liquor, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 71-19.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 3, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Ben Harper, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Qof Friedman Industries, Incorporated;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

          b) [intentionally omitted per SEC release 33-8238]

          c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

          d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

          a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:  February 14, 2008 /s/  BEN HARPER Senior Vice President-Finance and Secretary/Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrants form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1998.      
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       20,558
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             20,558
<PP&E>                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               20,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         4,000
<BONDS>                                           0                        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                  4,964,421
<OTHER-SE>                                   16,558
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 20,558
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,485)       
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,485)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
                           

</TABLE>
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): January 3, 2018














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)





Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).


Emerging growth company ☐





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐








---







Item 8.01   Other Events





The following is a summary of assets under management as of December 31, 2017 of Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (in millions):





By Investment VehicleProprietary funds$15,974Sub-advised funds1,518Institutional accounts4,825Total$22,317





By Investment StrategySmall Cap$1,525Small-Mid Cap3,528Mid Cap130Large Cap10,867All Cap Select450Long-Short4,980Corporate bonds699Core fixed income357(Less: Investments in affiliated funds)(219)Total$22,317








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:January 3, 2018By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
#### Julia Noda NUNO, Petitioner, v. Barry Edward BALZ and Allstate Insurance Co., Respondents.

No. 41887.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 28, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 23, 1972.

Robert C. Lane, Jr. of Bolles, Goodwin, Ryskamp & Ware, Miami, for petitioner.

David L. Willing, of Adams, George & Wood, Miami, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. *11We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the writ is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.

BOYD, J., dissents.
Park Pharmacy Corporation Announces New President and Director

DALLAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 19, 2001--Park Pharmacy Corporation
(OTCBB:PPRX - news), a regional network of specialty pharmacies
focusing on high-end and technical pharmacy services, today
announced that its Board of Directors has appointed Craig Mackey
as a director and as the President and Chief Operating Officer of
the Company.

Mr. Mackey replaces Thomas R. Baker, who resigned from his
position as Director, President and CEO on November 12, 2001.
Prior to joining Park Pharmacy, Mr. Mackey served as the Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and a member of the Board
of Directors of Williamson-Dickey Manufacturing Company, an
apparel manufacturing company with domestic and international
operations. The Board of Directors also approved the substitution
of Mr. Mackey for Mr. Baker in the Company's proxy materials for
its annual meeting of shareholders to be held on November 29,
2001. The Company will be mailing revised proxy materials on or
before November 19, 2001 to reflect the change in its director
nominees and management.

About Park Pharmacy

Park Pharmacy Corporation is based in Dallas, Texas and is
developing a regional network of community and specialty
pharmacies focusing on high-end and technical pharmacy services.
Through its operating subsidiaries, Park Pharmacy provides a
variety of services and products, such as (i) retail community
drugstores offering a comprehensive inventory of medicines; (ii)
infusion and compounding pharmacy services; (iii) durable and
home medical equipment and supplies; (iv) home care/institutional
pharmacies and (v) wholesale medical supply. Additionally, the
Company's subsidiary, Rx-Pro, Inc., provides electronic patient
charting, medical records and prescription transmission via the
Internet and wireless Web, creating a paperless work environment
for physicians, pharmacists, nurses and assisted living facility
personnel.

<PAGE>

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this press release that are not historical facts,
including statements about plans and expectations regarding
businesses and opportunities, demand and acceptance of new and
existing businesses, capital resources, and future financial
condition and results are forward-looking. Forward-looking
statements involve risks and uncertainties, which may cause
Park's actual results in future periods to differ materially and
adversely from those expressed. These uncertainties and risks
include challenges in integrating acquired businesses, changing
consumer preferences, lack of success of new businesses, loss of
Park's customers, competition, and other factors discussed from
time to time in Park's filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Contact:
     Park Pharmacy Corporation, Dallas
     Craig Mackey, 972/860-0202
#### Paul Benjamin PROCTOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-47.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.2b

Pass Through Trust Agreement LT, dated as of May 1, 2001, among Dynegy Roseton,
L.L.C., Dynegy Danskammer, L.L.C. and The Chase Manhattan Bank.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 602 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 602

To terminate all United States assistance to the National Endowment for 
                   Democracy, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1993

Mr. Kanjorski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To terminate all United States assistance to the National Endowment for 
                   Democracy, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF ASSISTANCE TO THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR 
              DEMOCRACY.

    (a) Repeal of NED Act.--The National Endowment for Democracy Act 
(22 U.S.C. 4411 et seq.) is hereby repealed.
    (b) Prohibition on Assistance to NED.--Funds may not be expended by 
any department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States for 
grants or any other assistance for the National Endowment for 
Democracy.
    (c) Final Audit by GAO.--The Comptroller General of the United 
States shall conduct an audit with respect to any funds, not previously 
audited by the Comptroller General, granted by the United States 
Government to the National Endowment for Democracy and shall submit a 
report of that audit to the Congress. The audit shall be conducted in 
accordance with, and under the conditions set forth in, section 504 of 
the National Endowment for Democracy Act (22 U.S.C. 4413).
    (d) Freedom of Information.--Notwithstanding subsection (a), 
section 506 of the National Endowment for Democracy Act (22 U.S.C. 
4415) shall continue to apply with respect to any funds received by the 
National Endowment for Democracy from the United States Government on 
or before the date of enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer ofSOURCECORP, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:



|Date: April 26, 2006 |  | /s/ED H. BOWMAN, JR.Ed H. Bowman, Jr. President and Chief Executive
Officer
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).

---



QuickLinks
256 La. 845

#### William E. McCRAY, M.D. and William P. Cloyd, Jr., M.D. v. James H. BLACKBURN, M.D.

No. 50753.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1970.

In re: James H. Blackburn applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 236 So.2d 859.

Writ refused. We find no error of law in the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
**Exhibit 31.1**
I, Jack Friedman, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive    Officer of Friedman Industries, Incorporated, a Texas    corporation, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Friedman Industries, Incorporated;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, result of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

          b) [intentionally omitted per SEC release 33-8238]

          c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

          d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

          a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 15, 2004 /s/  JACK FRIEDMAN Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
# Official Journal L 271/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 271 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6318 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 271

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6318 August 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.